Exhibit (c)(vi)
Preliminary & Confidential
PROJECT RANGER
Presentation to the Special Committee of the Board of Directors
December 5, 2001
Disclaimer
In preparing the enclosed materials, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, Inc. (“DrKW”) has assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the historical financial and other information provided to or discussed with us by NCH Corporation (“NCH” or the “Company”) or their representatives or that was publicly available, and we have not assumed any responsibility for independent verification of any such information. We have also assumed and relied upon the reasonableness and accuracy of the financial projections, forecasts, and analyses provided to us, and assumed that such projections, forecasts and analyses were reasonable, prepared in good faith and on bases reflecting the best currently available judgments and estimates of NCH management. We express no opinion with respect to such projections, forecasts, or analyses or the assumptions upon which they are based.
Our analyses are necessarily based on economic, regulatory, market, financial and other conditions as they exist on, and on the information made available to us as of, the date hereof. It should be understood that subsequent developments may affect the information contained in the enclosed materials, and DrKW has no obligation to update or revise such materials.
It is understood that the enclosed materials have been prepared by DrKW solely for the benefit and use of the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and may not be relied upon by any other person. The enclosed materials may not be quoted, referred to, reproduced at any time, or used in any manner for any other purpose or delivered to any other person without the prior written consent of DrKW.

Situation Overview
DRAFT
Table of Contents
| | |
A. | | Situation Overview |
|
|
|
|
B. | | Overview of Levy Group Proposal |
|
|
|
|
C. | | Selected Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
D. | | Valuation Summary |
|
|
|
|
E. | | Appendix |
|
|
|
|
| | 1. Discounted Cash Flow Analysis |
|
|
|
|
| | 2. Comparable Companies Analysis |
|
|
|
|
| | 3. Comparable Acquisitions Analysis |
|
|
|
|
| | 4. Leveraged Buyout Analysis |
|
|
|
|
| | 5. Premiums Analysis |
|
|
|
|
| | 6. Financial Projections |
|
|
|
|
| | 7. Stock Price Performance |

DRAFT
Situation Overview

-1-
Situation Overview
DRAFT
Levy Group Proposal
• | | On October 1, 2001, NCH Corporation (“NCH” or the “Company”) announced that on September 28, certain members of the Levy family (the “Levy Group”) had proposed to acquire the outstanding shares of NCH that the Levy Group did not already own for $47.50 per share in cash (the “Proposal”) |
| • | | The Proposal represents a 21.2% premium to the September 28 closing price of NCH’s common stock |
|
| • | | The Levy Group currently owns approximately 57.3% of the 5.3MM outstanding common shares of NCH |
|
| • | | In its letter to the Company’s Board of Directors dated September 28, the Levy Group indicated that members of the Levy family had no interest in selling their common stock in NCH other than approximately 229,000 shares that may be sold by certain family members |
| - | | Lester Levy Sr. and Irvin Levy have indicated that, for liquidity purposes, they each may sell approximately 100,000 shares (approximately 7% of their respective holdings), as well as 29,000 shares held in a Levy family trust, either in the tender offer contemplated by the Proposal or in the open market after a transaction is announced |
| • | | We also have been advised that Milton Levy and his family (who are not part of the Levy Group) may sell all of their approximate 15,000 to 20,000 NCH shares in the tender offer or in the open market after announcement |

-2-
Situation Overview
DRAFT
Transaction Timeline
• | | On October 8, 2001, DrKW was retained by the Special Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Special Committee”) to advise it with respect to the Proposal |
| • | | DrKW received a package of various documents from advisors to the Levy Group, including financial projections prepared by NCH in April and July 2001 |
|
| • | | Upon receipt of this package, DrKW commenced its due diligence |
• | | On October 22, 2001, DrKW and Sullivan & Cromwell (“S&C”), counsel to the Special Committee, met with NCH management as well as representatives of Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown (“Deutsche Bank”) and Debevoise & Plimpton (“Debevoise”) to discuss NCH’s operations, business plan and future prospects |
| • | | At that meeting, DrKW received a third set of projections prepared by NCH in mid-September 2001 |
• | | On October 24, 2001, DrKW received additional materials from NCH management, including annual budgets for some or all of the Company’s business segments, which were prepared at the end of the last two fiscal years |
|
• | | On October 24 and 26, 2001, DrKW received certain reports prepared by Bain & Company (“Bain”) for NCH, including a September 1998 project proposal, a December 1998 Plumbmaster strategy report, a March 1999 Chemical Specialties strategy report and an August 2001 Partsmaster strategy report |
|
• | | On October 26, 2001, DrKW and S&C participated in conference calls with representatives of the Company and the Levy Group about various due diligence matters, including the terms and status of the Levy Group’s proposed financing of the Proposal |

-3-
Situation Overview
DRAFT
Transaction Timeline(Cont’d)
• | | Also on October 26, 2001, DrKW and S&C participated in a conference call with Irvin Levy, Deustche Bank and Debevoise to discuss the Proposal and related matters, in which Mr. Levy made the following points, among others |
| • | | Although they had been approached from time to time by other firms about a possible recapitalization, neither the Company nor the Levy Group had hired any firm to evaluate this or any alternative transaction until the Levy Group engaged Debevoise and Deutsche Bank in January and March 2001, respectively, to begin evaluating a possible going private transaction |
|
| • | | Neither NCH nor the Levy Group has ever had any approaches by or discussions with third parties regarding a possible sale of NCH or any of its continuing operations |
|
| • | | The Levy Group has made no commitments and has no plans for NCH to make divestitures or acquisitions after consummation of the Proposal |
• | | On October 31, 2001, DrKW, the Special Committee and S&C met to discuss the Proposal |
| • | | After the meeting, DrKW, acting as a representative of the Special Committee, contacted the Levy Group’s advisors to propose that the Levy Group increase its offer for the minority stake to $57.00 per share |
• | | On November 8, DrKW and S&C participated in a conference call with representatives from Bain regarding the firm’s previous work for NCH |
| • | | In general, the Bain representative said that Bain had consulted regarding various issues facing the Company but did not identify any “quick fixes" |
|
| • | | The Bain representative emphasized that the deterioration in NCH’s European results in recent years was one of the Company’s most important problems |

-4-
Situation Overview
DRAFT
Transaction Timeline(Cont’d)
• | | On November 8 and November 12, DrKW and S&C participated in conference calls with representatives from Bank of America (“BofA”) to discuss various aspects of the proposed financing, including the proposed sources and uses of funds and the results of the bank’s due diligence efforts |
| • | | By letter dated November 8, BofA extended its due diligence deadline to December 10 with regard to two outstanding items: |
| - | | Customer interviews |
|
| - | | Phase 1 environmental reports |
| • | | Despite this extension, BofA indicated that the due diligence process was proceeding smoothly and no serious issues had been found |
• | | On November 28, NCH provided DrKW with preliminary financials for the quarter and six months ended October 31 |
| • | | The Company’s second quarter results appear to reflect continuing declining financial performance |
| - | | We are awaiting information from the Company to enable us to make comparisons with prior quarters which include some discontinued operations |
| • | | After giving effect to the preliminary October 31 financials, the Company’s LTM results decrease significantly, with LTM EBITDA falling by approximately $5.4MM |

-5-
Situation Overview
DRAFT
Transaction Timeline(Cont’d)
• | | On November 29, representatives of DrKW and Deutsche Bank met to discuss their respective valuation methodologies as well as the Company’s recent results |
| • | | A copy of the materials provided by Deutsche Bank is being separately provided to the Special Committee |
|
| • | | Throughout the meeting, Deutsche Bank’s representatives emphasized that the Company’s declining LTM performance effectively caused the Levy Group’s initial offer to represent a higher multiple of the Company’s recent results |
|
| - | | LTM EBITDA as of October 31 fell to $42.1MM from $47.5MM as of July 31 |
• | | Certain differences between Deutsche Bank’s and DrKW’s valuation methodologies were identified |
| • | | In its comparable company trading analysis, Deutsche Bank used a smaller universe of companies than DrKW. Deutsche Bank’s universe has a median LTM EBITDA multiple of 7.0x, compared with DrKW’s of 7.3x |
| - | | This assumes that Deutsche Bank gives equal weight to each of the companies in its comparable universe, which its representatives indicated was not the case |
| • | | In its comparable transactions analysis, Deutsche Bank has a median LTM EBITDA multiple of 8.1x and a median LTM revenue multiple of 0.6x, versus DrKW’s calculations of 7.0x and 0.4x, respectively |
| - | | Again, this assumes that Deutsche Bank gives equal weight to each of the transactions in the analysis |

-6-
Situation Overview
DRAFT
Transaction Timeline(Cont’d)
| • | | In its discounted cash flow analysis, Deutsche Bank representatives indicated that they used higher discount rates (they mentioned a range from 11-15%) than those used by DrKW |
| - | | An analysis of Deutsche Bank’s comparable companies suggests that Deutsche Bank applied some judgment to its range of discount rates, as the weighted average cost of capital for its comparables ranges from approximately 10-11% |

-7-
DRAFT
Overview of Levy Group Proposal

-8-
Overview of Levy Group Proposal
DRAFT
Overview of Levy Group Proposal($MM, except per share data)
• | | The Levy Group’s offer represents the following multiples: |
Implied Market Capitalization
| | | | |
Offer Price | | $ | 47.50 | |
|
|
|
|
Total Shares Outstanding (MM) | | | 5.3 | |
|
|
|
|
Plus: Option Value | | | 0.0 | |
| | |
| |
Equity Market Value | | $ | 253.0 | |
|
|
|
|
Plus: Net Debt | | | 37.1 | |
| | |
| |
Adjusted Market Value | | $ | 290.1 | |
Share Price Premium Comparison
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | 52-Week |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | 1-Day | | 1-Week | | 4-Week | | High | | Low |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Share Price Prior to 10/1/01(1) | | $ | 39.19 | | | $ | 39.30 | | | $ | 44.00 | | | $ | 56.28 | | | $ | 35.25 | |
|
|
|
|
Offer Premium | | | 21.2 | % | | | 20.9 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | (15.6 | %) | | | 34.8 | % |
NCH Acquisition Multiples Implied by $47.50 Per Share Price
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Adjusted Market Value | | Equity Market Value |
| | Amounts | | as a Multiple of | | as a Multiple of |
| |
| |
| |
|
| | Sales | | EBITDA | | EBIT | | Net Income | | Book Value | | Sales | | EBITDA | | EBIT | | Net Income | | Book Value |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
LTM as of 10/31/01 | | $ | 652.8 | | | $ | 42.1 | | | $ | 30.1 | | | $ | 19.9 | | | $ | 230.7 | | | | 0.4x | | | | 6.9x | | | | 9.6x | | | | 12.7x | | | | 1.1x | |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year ’02(2) | | | 625.8 | | | | 43.5 | | | | 29.5 | | | | 19.7 | | | | 235.0 | | | | 0.5x | | | | 6.7x | | | | 9.8x | | | | 12.8x | | | | 1.1x | |
(1) | | The Levy Proposal was publicly announced on 10/01/01. |
|
|
|
|
(2) | | Source: September NCH management projections. |

-9-
Overview of Levy Group Proposal
DRAFT
Multiple Sensitivity Analysis($MM, except per share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Price Per Share | | $ | 47.50 | | | $ | 48.00 | | | $ | 50.00 | | | $ | 52.00 | | | $ | 54.00 | | | $ | 56.00 | | | $ | 58.00 | | | $ | 60.00 | |
|
|
|
|
Premium to 9/28/01 | | | 21.2 | % | | | 22.5 | % | | | 27.6 | % | | | 32.7 | % | | | 37.8 | % | | | 42.9 | % | | | 48.0 | % | | | 53.1 | % |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
Fully-Diluted Shares | | | 5.3 | | | | 5.3 | | | | 5.3 | | | | 5.3 | | | | 5.3 | | | | 5.3 | | | | 5.3 | | | | 5.3 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Equity Market Value | | $ | 253.0 | | | $ | 255.7 | | | $ | 266.4 | | | $ | 277.0 | | | $ | 287.7 | | | $ | 298.3 | | | $ | 309.0 | | | $ | 319.6 | |
|
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
Plus Net Debt as of 10/31/01 | | | 37.1 | | | | 37.1 | | | | 37.1 | | | | 37.1 | | | | 37.1 | | | | 37.1 | | | | 37.1 | | | | 37.1 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Adjusted Market Value | | $ | 290.1 | | | $ | 292.8 | | | $ | 303.5 | | | $ | 314.1 | | | $ | 324.8 | | | $ | 335.4 | | | $ | 346.1 | | | $ | 356.7 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | FY 2001 | | | $649.6 | | | | 0.4x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | |
|
|
|
|
| | LTM | | | 652.8 | | | | 0.4x | | | | 0.4x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | |
|
|
|
|
| | FY 2002E | | | 625.8 | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.5x | | | | 0.6x | | | | 0.6x | |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | FY 2001 | | | $51.9 | | | | 5.6x | | | | 5.6x | | | | 5.8x | | | | 6.1x | | | | 6.3x | | | | 6.5x | | | | 6.7x | | | | 6.9x | |
|
|
|
|
| | LTM | | | 42.1 | | | | 6.9x | | | | 7.0x | | | | 7.2x | | | | 7.5x | | | | 7.7x | | | | 8.0x | | | | 8.2x | | | | 8.5x | |
|
|
|
|
| | FY 2002E | | | 43.5 | | | | 6.7x | | | | 6.7x | | | | 7.0x | | | | 7.2x | | | | 7.5x | | | | 7.7x | | | | 8.0x | | | | 8.2x | |
|
|
|
|
EPS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| | FY 2001 | | | $3.75 | | | | 12.7x | | | | 12.8x | | | | 13.3x | | | | 13.9x | | | | 14.4x | | | | 14.9x | | | | 15.4x | | | | 16.0x | |
|
|
|
|
| | LTM | | | 3.73 | | | | 12.7x | | | | 12.9x | | | | 13.4x | | | | 13.9x | | | | 14.5x | | | | 15.0x | | | | 15.5x | | | | 16.1x | |
|
|
|
|
| | FY 2002E | | | 3.70 | | | | 12.8x | | | | 13.0x | | | | 13.5x | | | | 14.1x | | | | 14.6x | | | | 15.1x | | | | 15.7x | | | | 16.2x | |

-10-
Overview of Levy Group Proposal
DRAFT
Merger Agreement Financial Points
• | | The current draft merger agreement (the “Merger Agreement”) proposed by the Levy Group provides for a two-step acquisition: |
| • | | An initial tender offer to purchase shares at $47.50 in cash, followed by |
|
| • | | A short-form merger at the same price |
• | | Principal conditions include: |
| • | | Tender of a minimum number of shares that, when added to the Levy Group’s shares, will equal at least 90% of the outstanding shares |
| - | | Requires non-Levy Group stockholders to tender approximately 77% of their shares to produce the additional percentage of outstanding shares needed (approximately 33%) |
| • | | Accordingly, this condition imposes a “super-majority of the minority” requirement on the deal |
| - | | Whether this condition can be waived without the Special Committee’s consent is still an open point |
| • | | Financing for the tender offer and merger shall have been obtained on terms reasonably satisfactory to the Levy Group |
| - | | The Levy Group has provided a written financing commitment, subject to customary conditions, including a material adverse change condition |
|
| - | | It is important to note that the presence of a financing condition, particularly during the present period of significant market uncertainty, injects a meaningful degree of uncertainty into the Levy Proposal |
| • | | Other customary conditions, including any development with a material adverse effect on the Company and market outs |

-11-
Overview of Levy Group Proposal
DRAFT
Financing Commitment Summary
• | | The Levy Group has provided DrKW with a commitment letter from Bank of America for a new senior credit facility to finance the Proposal and to provide working capital, with the following principal terms |
| | | | |
• | | Total Amount: | | $130 million, subject to reduction if BofA is unable to successfully syndicate the facility, but to not less than the amount required to consummate the Proposal; subject to foregoing, BofA will commit to lend the full amount of the facility |
|
|
|
|
• | | Credit Facilities: | | Five-year $80 million revolving credit facility and five-year amortizing $50 million term loan facility |
|
|
|
|
• | | Security: | | All capital stock of borrower and domestic subsidiaries; 65% of stock of foreign subsidiaries; all present and future accounts receivable and inventory; guarantees by all existing and future domestic subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
• | | Conditions: | | Maximum Leverage Ratio (funded debt/EBITDA) of 2.25x at closing; other customary conditions, including satisfactory due diligence and documentation, absence of material changes, etc. |
|
|
|
|
• | | Financial Covenants: | | Maintenance of LTM Maximum Leverage Ratio of 2.75x, with future step-downs to be agreed; Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (unspecified); Minimum Asset Coverage Ratio (unspecified) |

-12-
Overview of Levy Group Proposal
DRAFT
Debt Capacity Analysis
• | | The Levy Group has indicated that it plans to use approximately $80MM of borrowings under the new senior credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”) and $50MM of NCH cash and equivalents to complete the transaction |
| • | | Management has indicated that the balance of the cash remaining on the Company’s balance sheet ($28MM) is needed for working capital for the Company’s international subsidiaries |
|
| • | | The Company also has indicated that it plans to reserve approximately $20MM of availability under the New Credit Facility to fund potential liabilities at an NCH Superfund site in New Jersey, and as much as $10MM of availability to fund potential deferred compensation expense |
|
| • | | Accordingly, the Company would have a balance of approximately $22MM of working capital availability under the New Credit Facility |
• | | Assuming $78MM of borrowings under the New Credit Facility are utilized to fund the Proposal, the Company would have a pro forma funded debt-to-EBITDA ratio of approximately 1.9x, below the maximum of 2.25x allowed at closing |
Sources ($MM)
| | | | |
NCH Cash | | $ | 50.0 | |
|
|
|
|
New Credit Facility | | | 78.0 | |
| | |
| |
Total Sources | | $ | 128.0 | |
Uses ($MM)
| | | | |
Public Shares Purchased ($47.50) | | $ | 109.3 | |
|
|
|
|
Levy Group Shrs. Purchased ($47.50) | | | 10.9 | |
|
|
|
|
Options & Stock Participation Plan | | | 0.4 | |
|
|
|
|
Dividends Payable | | | 1.9 | |
|
|
|
|
Approximate Fees And Expenses | | | 5.6 | |
| | |
| |
Total Uses | | $ | 128.0 | |

-13-
Overview of Levy Group Proposal
DRAFT
Debt Capacity Analysis($MM) (Cont’d)
• | | The Company likely could comply with the facility’s leverage covenants at a range of higher purchase prices |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Purchase Price per Share | | $ | 47.50 | | | $ | 48.00 | | | $ | 50.00 | | | $ | 52.00 | | | $ | 54.00 | | | $ | 56.00 | | | $ | 58.00 | | | $ | 60.00 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Uses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| Public Shares Acquired | | $ | 109.3 | | | $ | 110.4 | | | $ | 115.0 | | | $ | 119.6 | | | $ | 124.2 | | | $ | 128.8 | | | $ | 133.4 | | | $ | 138.0 | |
|
|
|
|
| Levy Group Shares Acquired | | | 10.9 | | | | 11.0 | | | | 11.5 | | | | 11.9 | | | | 12.4 | | | | 12.8 | | | | 13.3 | | | | 13.7 | |
|
|
|
|
| Options Cashed Out | | | 0.4 | | | | 0.4 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 0.5 | |
|
|
|
|
| Dividends Payable | | | 1.9 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 1.9 | |
|
|
|
|
| Fees and Expenses | | | 5.6 | | | | 5.6 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 5.8 | | | | 5.8 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Total | | $ | 128.0 | | | $ | 129.3 | | | $ | 134.5 | | | $ | 139.6 | | | $ | 144.6 | | | $ | 149.7 | | | $ | 154.8 | | | $ | 159.8 | |
|
|
|
|
Financing Sources: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
| Cash | | $ | 50.0 | | | $ | 50.0 | | | $ | 50.0 | | | $ | 50.0 | | | $ | 50.0 | | | $ | 50.0 | | | $ | 50.0 | | | $ | 50.0 | |
|
|
|
|
| Debt | | | 78.0 | | | | 79.3 | | | | 84.5 | | | | 89.6 | | | | 94.6 | | | | 99.7 | | | | 104.8 | | | | 109.8 | |
| | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
Total | | $ | 128.0 | | | $ | 129.3 | | | $ | 134.5 | | | $ | 139.6 | | | $ | 144.6 | | | $ | 149.7 | | | $ | 154.8 | | | $ | 159.8 | |
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Debt / LTM EBITDA(1) | | | 1.85x | | | | 1.88x | | | | 2.01x | | | | 2.13x | | | | 2.25x | | | | 2.37x | | | | 2.49x | | | | 2.61x | |
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted Debt / LTM EBITDA(1)(2) | | | 2.57x | | | | 2.60x | | | | 2.72x | | | | 2.84x | | | | 2.96x | | | | 3.08x | | | | 3.20x | | | | 3.32x | |
|
|
|
|
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio | | | 1.4x | | | | 1.4x | | | | 1.3x | | | | 1.3x | | | | 1.3x | | | | 1.3x | | | | 1.2x | | | | 1.2x | |
(1) | | Based on LTM EBITDA of $42.1MM. Assumes $28MM of cash not available to fund transaction or pay down debt. |
|
|
|
|
(2) | | Assumes $20MM and $10MM of availability under the New Credit facility used to fund environmental liabilities and deferred compensation obligations, respectively. |

-14-
Overview of Levy Group Proposal
DRAFT
Significant Transaction Issues
• | | Stock Price Performance Issues |
| • | | The Levy Group’s $47.50 offer is 1.2% below the Company’s pre-offer 6-month average trading price of $48.08 and 15.6% below its 52-week high of $56.28 |
|
| • | | The Company’s stock price fell significantly in June shortly before and after it was removed from the S&P Midcap 400 Index |
|
| • | | NCH stock price also has suffered due to the following factors: |
| - | | Overhang due to the Levy family’s ownership stake |
|
| - | | Small public float (2.2MM shares) |
|
| - | | Low trading volume (10,000 shares a day) |
|
| - | | No current equity coverage |
|
| - | | Inability of equity funds to buy stock due to lack of float |

-15-
Overview of Levy Group Proposal
DRAFT
Significant Transaction Issues(Cont’d)
• | | Financial Performance Issues |
| • | | NCH’s financial performance has deteriorated in recent years |
| - | | Both current EBITDA and operating income margins are lower than the Company’s five year averages |
|
| - | | Results for the most recent quarter (ended October 31) appear to continue this negative trend |
|
| - | | A key question is whether the Company’s financial performance is susceptible to continued deterioration, or if it is likely to improve in the reasonably near future |
| • | | Going forward, little near-term opportunity for meaningful stock price appreciation appears to exist outside of an offer from the Levy Group |
| - | | Management projects declining financial results in fiscal year 2002 over the previous year |
| • | | The long-term viability of the Company’s direct sales model is questionable |
| - | | The Company faces increasing pressure from consolidating suppliers, customers and competitors |
| • | | Revenue at NCH’s Plumbing Products and Retail Products Groups is heavily tied to a small number of retailers |
| - | | Plumbing Products Group has invested heavily to maintain shelf space with its major customers |
|
| - | | Retail Products Group generates nearly 80% of revenue from five customers |
| • | | The Company’s Landmark Direct division is projected to operate at break-even for fiscal year 2002 |

-16-
Overview of Levy Group Proposal
DRAFT
Significant Transaction Issues(Cont’d)
| • | | Any alternative buyer would not be able to execute a transaction without the support of the Levy Group |
|
| • | | The Company’s stock price would likely fall if the offer were rescinded |
|
| • | | The Levy Proposal does provide liquidity for minority shareholders, which would be difficult to achieve in the public markets |
|
| • | | The Proposal would eliminate any downside in the stock price, as well as any upside opportunity |

-17-
DRAFT
Selected Financial
Information

-18-
Selected Financial Information
DRAFT
Financial Summary($MM)(1)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Historical | |
Summary Financials | | 1999 | | | 2000 | | | 2001 | | | LTM(2) | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Sales | | $ | 674.5 | | | $ | 674.3 | | | $ | 649.6 | | | $ | 652.8 | |
| Growth | | | | | | | 0.0 | % | | | -3.7 | % | | | | |
Gross Profit | | | 291.6 | | | | 291.5 | | | | 283.9 | | | | 271.1 | |
| Gross Margin | | | 43.2 | % | | | 43.2 | % | | | 43.7 | % | | | 41.5 | % |
SG&A | | | (244.7 | ) | | | (244.6 | ) | | | (232.0 | ) | | | (229.0 | ) |
| SG&A/Sales | | | 36.3 | % | | | 36.3 | % | | | 35.7 | % | | | 35.1 | % |
EBITDA | | | 46.9 | | | | 46.9 | | | | 51.9 | | | | 42.1 | |
| Margin | | | 7.0 | % | | | 7.0 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | 6.4 | % |
EBIT | | | 33.1 | | | | 33.0 | | | | 39.8 | | | | 30.1 | |
| Operating Margin | | | 4.9 | % | | | 4.9 | % | | | 6.1 | % | | | 4.6 | % |
Net Interest Expense | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (3.0 | ) | | | (1.8 | ) |
Taxes | | | (12.1 | ) | | | (12.0 | ) | | | (16.8 | ) | | | (8.4 | ) |
| Tax Rate | | | 36.5 | % | | | 36.5 | % | | | 45.7 | % | | | 29.6 | % |
Net Income | | | 21.0 | | | | 21.0 | | | | 20.0 | | | | 19.9 | |
Capital Expenditures | | | (12.7 | ) | | | (8.8 | ) | | | (10.5 | ) | | | NA | |
| CapEx/Sales | | | 1.9 | % | | | 1.3 | % | | | 1.6 | % | | | NA | |
Free Cash Flow | | | 22.1 | | | | 26.0 | | | | 21.6 | | | | NA | |
| Margin | | | 3.3 | % | | | 3.9 | % | | | 3.3 | % | | | NA | |
| | | | | | | | |
Balance Sheet Information, 10/31/01 | | Amount | | | % | |
| |
| | |
| |
Cash & Equivalents | | | 78.8 | | | | | |
Short-Term Debt | | | 1.3 | | | | 0.4 | % |
Long-Term Debt | | | 0.0 | | | | | |
Retirement & Deferred Compensation | | | 114.6 | | | | 33.1 | % |
Preferred Stock | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | % |
Shareholders’ Equity | | | 230.7 | | | | 66.6 | % |
| |
| | |
| |
Total Capitalization | | | 346.6 | | | | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Market Capitalization | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 46.75 | |
FD Shares Outstanding (MM) | | | | | x | | 5.327 | |
| | | | | |
| |
Equity Market Value | | | | | | $ | 249.0 | |
Preferred Stock | | | | | | | 0.0 | |
Net Debt | | | | | + | | 37.1 | |
| | | | | |
| |
Adjusted Market Value | | | | | | $ | 286.1 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Adjusted Market Value as a Multiple of: | | | | | | | | |
| | FY2001 | | | LTM | |
| |
| | |
| |
Sales | | | 0.4 | x | | | 0.4 | x |
EBITDA | | | 5.5 | x | | | 6.8 | x |
EBIT | | | 7.2 | x | | | 9.5 | x |
FCF | | | 13.3 | x | | NA | |
|
Equity Market Value as a Multiple of: | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Net Income | | | 12.5 | x | | | 12.5 | x |
Book Value | | | 1.1 | x | | | | |
(1) | 1999 and 2000 figures include discontinued operations. |
(2) | Through 10/31/01. |

-19-
Selected Financial Information
DRAFT
LTM Trend Results($MM, except per share)(1)
• | | The Company’s LTM results have declined over the past three quarters, as the Company’s superior FY 2001 results are replaced with FY 2002 performance |
| | • | Preliminary second quarter financials indicate that operating income is down approximately $0.5MM over the first quarter, and revenue is up $0.1MM |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Latest Twelve Months Results as of:
| |
| | | 4/30/01 | | | 7/31/01 | | | 10/31/01 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Revenue | | $ | 649.6 | | | $ | 646.5 | | | $ | 652.8 | |
EBITDA | | | 51.9 | | | | 47.5 | | | | 42.1 | |
EBIT | | | 39.8 | | | | 35.6 | | | | 30.1 | |
Net Income | | | 22.9 | | | | 21.0 | | | | 19.9 | |
Earnings per Share | | $ | 4.29 | | | $ | 3.93 | | | | 3.73 | |
Levy Group Offer as a Multiple of: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Revenue | | | 0.4x | | | | 0.4x | �� | | | 0.4x | |
| EBITDA | | | 5.6x | | | | 6.1x | | | | 6.9x | |
| EBIT | | | 7.3x | | | | 8.2x | | | | 9.6x | |
| Net Income | | | 11.1x | | | | 12.1x | | | | 12.7x | |
(1) | Includes results from continuing operations only. |

-20-
Selected Financial Information
DRAFT
Performance vs. Projections($MM, except per share)
• | | The Company’s performance in the past six months puts it in position to meet or exceed the projections created in both July and September |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Fiscal Year 2002 Projections | |
| | 6 Months | | | Latest 6 Months | | |
| |
| | 10/31/01 | | | Annualized | | | September | | | July | | | April | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Revenue | | $ | 338.1 | | | $ | 676.3 | | | $ | 625.8 | | | $ | 642.1 | | | $ | 650.7 | |
EBITDA | | | 22.8 | | | | 45.6 | | | | 43.6 | | | | 46.0 | | | | 55.7 | |
EBIT | | | 16.9 | | | | 33.8 | | | | 29.5 | | | | 31.9 | | | | 41.7 | |
Net Income | | | 12.0 | | | | 24.0 | | | | 18.8 | | | | 22.1 | | | | 29.5 | |

-21-
Selected Financial Information
DRAFT
Five Year Historical Performance($MM)
• | | As restated to exclude discontinued operations, FY2001 sales, operating income, EBITDA and net income all were below the Company’s five year averages |
|
| | • | However, results for all years besides 2001 include discontinued operations, so comparisons between years may not be meaningful |
• | | Operating income, EBITDA and their respective margins increased over the prior year for the first time in several years in FY2001, although they remain below the levels achieved in 1997 — 1999 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2001 | | | 2001 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Five Year | |
| | | Reported(1) | | | Restated | | | 2000(1) | | | 1999(1) | | | 1998(2) | | | 1997(3) | | | Average | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Net Sales | | $ | 679.7 | | | $ | 649.6 | | | $ | 726.0 | | | $ | 725.4 | | | $ | 715.5 | | | $ | 766.8 | | | $ | 716.6 | |
Operating Income | | | 40.9 | | | | 39.8 | | | | 34.4 | | | | 45.4 | | | | 50.6 | | | | 56.3 | | | | 45.3 | |
| Margin | | | 6.0 | % | | | 6.1 | % | | | 4.7 | % | | | 6.3 | % | | | 7.1 | % | | | 7.3 | % | | | 6.3 | % |
EBITDA | | | 53.0 | | | | 51.9 | | | | 48.2 | | | | 59.2 | | | | 65.3 | | | | 71.3 | | | | 59.2 | |
| Margin | | | 7.8 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | 6.6 | % | | | 8.2 | % | | | 9.1 | % | | | 9.3 | % | | | 8.2 | % |
Net Income | | | 30.1 | | | | 20.0 | | | | 18.4 | | | | 22.4 | | | | 35.1 | | | | 34.7 | | | | 26.1 | |
(1) | | 2001 Reported, 2000 and 1999 figures include results from the following discontinued operations: N-E Thing Supply, Westmont/Friendly, 360 Markets and Landmark Discontinued Lines. |
(2) | | 1998 figures include results from the following discontinued operations: N-E Thing Supply, Westmont/Friendly, 360 Markets, Landmark Discontinued Lines and DBS Services Group. |
(3) | | 1997 figures include results from the following discontinued operations: N-E Thing Supply, Westmont/Friendly, 360 Markets, Landmark Discontinued Lines, DBS Services Group and Resource Electronics. |

-22-
Selected Financial Information
DRAFT
Financial Summary($MM, except per share data)
• | | The following is based on management projections as of mid-September |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Historical | | | Projected | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | | 1999 | | | 2000 | | | 2001 | | | LTM | | | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Sales | | $ | 674.5 | | | $ | 674.3 | | | $ | 649.6 | | | $ | 652.8 | | | $ | 625.8 | | | $ | 647.3 | | | $ | 669.6 | | | $ | 697.4 | | | $ | 727.1 | |
| Growth | | | | | | | (0.0 | %) | | | (3.7 | %) | | | | | | | (3.7 | %) | | | 3.4 | % | | | 3.4 | % | | | 4.2 | % | | | 4.3 | % |
Gross Profit | | | 291.6 | | | | 291.5 | | | | 283.9 | | | | 271.1 | | | | 270.5 | | | | 282.2 | | | | 293.6 | | | | 308.7 | | | | 323.4 | |
| Gross Margin | | | 43.2 | % | | | 43.2 | % | | | 43.7 | % | | | 41.5 | % | | | 43.2 | % | | | 43.6 | % | | | 43.8 | % | | | 44.3 | % | | | 44.5 | % |
SG&A | | | (244.7 | ) | | | (244.6 | ) | | | (232.0 | ) | | | (229.0 | ) | | | (227.0 | ) | | | (233.3 | ) | | | (240.3 | ) | | | (249.1 | ) | | | (259.6 | ) |
| SG&A/Sales | | | 36.3 | % | | | 36.3 | % | | | 35.7 | % | | | 35.1 | % | | | 36.3 | % | | | 36.0 | % | | | 35.9 | % | | | 35.7 | % | | | 35.7 | % |
EBITDA | | | 46.9 | | | | 46.9 | | | | 51.9 | | | | 42.1 | | | | 43.5 | | | | 48.9 | | | | 53.3 | | | | 59.6 | | | | 63.8 | |
| Margin | | | 7.0 | % | | | 7.0 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | 7.0 | % | | | 7.6 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | 8.5 | % | | | 8.8 | % |
EBIT | | | 33.1 | | | | 33.0 | | | | 39.8 | | | | 30.1 | | | | 29.5 | | | | 34.0 | | | | 37.4 | | | | 42.8 | | | | 45.9 | |
| Operating Margin | | | 4.9 | % | | | 4.9 | % | | | 6.1 | % | | | 4.6 | % | | | 4.7 | % | | | 5.2 | % | | | 5.6 | % | | | 6.1 | % | | | 6.3 | % |
Net Interest Expense | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | (3.0 | ) | | | (1.8 | ) | | | (0.5 | ) | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 0.0 | |
Taxes | | | (12.1 | ) | | | (12.0 | ) | | | (16.8 | ) | | | (8.4 | ) | | | (12.1 | ) | | | (14.1 | ) | | | (15.6 | ) | | | (17.8 | ) | | | (19.2 | ) |
| Tax Rate | | | 36.5 | % | | | 36.5 | % | | | 45.7 | % | | | 29.6 | % | | | 38.0 | % | | | 38.0 | % | | | 38.0 | % | | | 38.0 | % | | | 38.0 | % |
Net Income | | | 21.0 | | | | 21.0 | | | | 20.0 | | | | 19.9 | | | | 19.7 | | | | 23.0 | | | | 25.4 | | | | 29.0 | | | | 31.4 | |
| EPS | | $ | 3.89 | | | $ | 3.92 | | | $ | 3.77 | | | $ | 3.73 | | | $ | 3.71 | | | $ | 4.31 | | | $ | 4.76 | | | $ | 5.44 | | | $ | 5.88 | |

-23-
Selected Financial Information
DRAFT
Projection Comparison — Consolidated($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(FY Ended April 30) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAGR | |
| | 2001A | | | 2002 | | | 2003 | | | 2004 | | | 2005 | | | 2006 | | | '01 - '06 | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 649.6 | | | $ | 650.7 | | | $ | 673.2 | | | $ | 701.6 | | | $ | 725.2 | | | $ | 751.4 | | | | 3.0 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 642.1 | | | | 647.2 | | | | 669.6 | | | | 697.4 | | | | 727.0 | | | | 2.3 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 625.8 | | | | 647.3 | | | | 669.6 | | | | 697.4 | | | | 727.1 | | | | 2.3 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | $ | (8.6 | ) | | $ | (26.0 | ) | | $ | (32.0 | ) | | $ | (27.8 | ) | | $ | (24.4 | ) | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (16.3 | ) | | | 0.1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0.1 | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 39.8 | | | $ | 41.7 | | | $ | 43.6 | | | $ | 46.4 | | | $ | 48.4 | | | $ | 50.7 | | | | 6.2 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 31.9 | | | | 36.3 | | | | 40.7 | | | | 44.7 | | | | 48.3 | | | | 5.0 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 29.5 | | | | 34.8 | | | | 39.2 | | | | 44.8 | | | | 48.4 | | | | 5.0 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | $ | (9.8 | ) | | $ | (7.3 | ) | | $ | (5.7 | ) | | $ | (3.7 | ) | | $ | (2.4 | ) | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (2.4 | ) | | | (1.5 | ) | | | (1.5 | ) | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | | | | | |
Operating Margin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | | 6.1 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | 6.5 | % | | | 6.6 | % | | | 6.7 | % | | | 6.7 | % | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 5.6 | % | | | 6.1 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | 6.6 | % | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 4.7 | % | | | 5.4 | % | | | 5.9 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | 6.7 | % | | | | |

-24-
DRAFT
Valuation Summary

-25-
Valuation Summary
DRAFT
Preliminary Summary Valuation

(1) | | Offer price indicated in the Proposal. |
(2) | | Includes control premium based on medium premium paid since 1/1/97 for close-outs of minority stakes by acquirers with at least 50% ownership prior to bid. |
(3) | | Based on multiples paid in third-party change of control transactions. |
(4) | | Reflects the median premiums paid since 1/1/97 for close-outs of minority stakes by acquirers with at least 50% ownership prior to bid. |

-26-
Valuation Summary
DRAFT
Preliminary Summary Valuation($MM, except per share data)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Enterprise Value | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | as a Multiple of FY 01 | |
| | Enterprise | | | Equity | | | Share | | |
| |
Methods and Assumptions | | Value Range | | | Value Range | | | Price Range | | | Sales | | | EBITDA | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis- | | | $323.7 - $403.4 | | | | $286.6 - $366.3 | | | | $54.00 - $69.00 | | | | 0.5x - 0.6x | | | | 6.2x - 7.8x | |
April 2001 Projections | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis- | | | $307.8 - $382.1 | | | | $270.7 - $345.0 | | | | $51.00 - $65.00 | | | | 0.5x - 0.6x | | | | 5.9x - 7.4x | |
July 2001 Projections | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis- | | | $302.5 - $376.8 | | | | $265.4 - $339.7 | | | | $50.00 - $64.00 | | | | 0.5x - 0.6x | | | | 5.8x - 7.3x | |
September 2001 Projections | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Comparable Companies Trading | | | $276.0 - $355.6 | | | | $238.9 - $318.5 | | | | $45.00 - $60.00 | | | | 0.4x - 0.5x | | | | 5.3x - 6.9x | |
Analysis (w/ Premium)(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Comparable Acquisitions | | | $254.7 - $334.4 | | | | $217.6 - $297.2 | | | | $41.00 - $56.00 | | | | 0.4x - 0.5x | | | | 4.9x - 6.4x | |
Analysis(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Premiums Analysis(3) | | | $291.9 - $345.0 | | | | $254.8 - $307.9 | | | | $48.00 - $58.00 | | | | 0.4x - 0.5x | | | | 5.6x - 6.6x | |
|
52-Week Trading Range | | | $224.2 - $335.8 | | | | $187.1 - $298.7 | | | | $35.25 - $56.28 | | | | 0.3x - 0.5x | | | | 4.3x - 6.5x | |
|
Current Trading Price | | | $287.4 | | | | $250.3 | | | | $47.15 | | | | 0.4x | | | | 5.5x | |
(1) | | Range includes 21.5% control premium based on median premium paid since 1/1/97 for close-outs of minority stakes by acquirers with at least 50% ownership prior to bid. |
(2) | | Based on multiples paid in third-party change of control transactions. |
(3) | | Reflects the median premiums paid since 1/1/97 for close-outs of minority stakes by acquirers with at least 50% ownership prior to bid. |

-27-
DRAFT
Appendix

-28-
DRAFT
Discounted Cash Flow
Analysis

-29-
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
DRAFT
Consolidated DCF Analysis — April Projections
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | EBITDA Exit Multiple (2006 Exit) | |
Discount | | | | | |
| |
Rate | | | | | | 5.5x | | | 6.0x | | | 6.5x | | | 7.0x | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | PV of Cash Flow Stream | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 87 | | | $ | 87 | |
| | PV of Perpetuity | | | 246 | | | | 269 | | | | 291 | | | | 314 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
9.5% | | Enterprise Value | | $ | 334 | | | $ | 356 | | | $ | 379 | | | $ | 401 | |
| | Less: Net Debt (10/31/00) | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | Equity Value | | $ | 297 | | | $ | 319 | | | $ | 342 | | | $ | 364 | |
| | Implied Price Per Share | | $ | 55.90 | | | $ | 60.12 | | | $ | 64.35 | | | $ | 68.57 | |
| | Implied FCF Growth in Perpetuity | | | 1.5 | % | | | 2.1 | % | | | 2.6 | % | | | 3.1 | % |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '01A EBITDA | | | 6.4x | | | | 6.9x | | | | 7.3x | | | | 7.7x | |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '02E EBITDA | | | 6.0x | | | | 6.4x | | | | 6.8x | | | | 7.2x | |
|
| | PV of Cash Flow Stream | | $ | 86 | | | $ | 86 | | | $ | 86 | | | $ | 86 | |
| | PV of Perpetuity | | | 242 | | | | 264 | | | | 286 | | | | 308 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
10.0% | | Enterprise Value | | $ | 328 | | | $ | 350 | | | $ | 372 | | | $ | 394 | |
| | Less: Net Debt (10/31/00) | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | Equity Value | | $ | 291 | | | $ | 313 | | | $ | 335 | | | $ | 357 | |
| | Implied Price Per Share | | $ | 54.81 | | | $ | 58.95 | | | $ | 63.09 | | | $ | 67.23 | |
| | Implied FCF Growth in Perpetuity | | | 1.9 | % | | | 2.6 | % | | | 3.1 | % | | | 3.6 | % |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '01A EBITDA | | | 6.3x | | | | 6.7x | | | | 7.2x | | | | 7.6x | |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '02E EBITDA | | | 5.9x | | | | 6.3x | | | | 6.7x | | | | 7.1x | |
|
| | PV of Cash Flow Stream | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 85 | | | $ | 85 | |
| | PV of Perpetuity | | | 237 | | | | 259 | | | | 280 | | | | 302 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
10.5% | | Enterprise Value | | $ | 322 | | | $ | 344 | | | $ | 365 | | | $ | 387 | |
| | Less: Net Debt (10/31/00) | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | Equity Value | | $ | 285 | | | $ | 307 | | | $ | 328 | | | $ | 350 | |
| | Implied Price Per Share | | $ | 53.74 | | | $ | 57.80 | | | $ | 61.86 | | | $ | 65.92 | |
| | Implied FCF Growth in Perpetuity | | | 2.4 | % | | | 3.0 | % | | | 3.6 | % | | | 4.0 | % |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '01A EBITDA | | | 6.2x | | | | 6.6x | | | | 7.0x | | | | 7.5x | |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '02E EBITDA | | | 5.8x | | | | 6.2x | | | | 6.6x | | | | 6.9x | |

-30-
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
DRAFT
Consolidated DCF Analysis — July Projections
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | EBITDA Exit Multiple (2006 Exit) | |
Discount | | | | | |
| |
Rate | | | | | | 5.5x | | | 6.0x | | | 6.5x | | | 7.0x | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | PV of Cash Flow Stream | | $ | 80 | | | $ | 80 | | | $ | 80 | | | $ | 80 | |
| | PV of Perpetuity | | | 238 | | | | 259 | | | | 281 | | | | 303 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
9.5% | | Enterprise Value | | $ | 318 | | | $ | 340 | | | $ | 361 | | | $ | 383 | |
| | Less: Net Debt (10/31/00) | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | Equity Value | | $ | 281 | | | $ | 302 | | | $ | 324 | | | $ | 346 | |
| | Implied Price Per Share | | $ | 52.91 | | | $ | 56.98 | | | $ | 61.05 | | | $ | 65.13 | |
| | Implied FCF Growth in Perpetuity | | | 1.9 | % | | | 2.5 | % | | | 3.0 | % | | | 3.5 | % |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '01A EBITDA | | | 6.1 | x | | | 6.5 | x | | | 7.0 | x | | | 7.4 | x |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '02E EBITDA | | | 6.9 | x | | | 7.4 | x | | | 7.9 | x | | | 8.3 | x |
|
| | PV of Cash Flow Stream | | $ | 79 | | | $ | 79 | | | $ | 79 | | | $ | 79 | |
| | PV of Perpetuity | | | 233 | | | | 255 | | | | 276 | | | | 297 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
10.0% | | Enterprise Value | | $ | 312 | | | $ | 334 | | | $ | 355 | | | $ | 376 | |
| | Less: Net Debt (10/31/00) | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | Equity Value | | $ | 275 | | | $ | 296 | | | $ | 318 | | | $ | 339 | |
| | Implied Price Per Share | | $ | 51.86 | | | $ | 55.86 | | | $ | 59.85 | | | $ | 63.85 | |
| | Implied FCF Growth in Perpetuity | | | 2.4 | % | | | 3.0 | % | | | 3.5 | % | | | 3.9 | % |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '01A EBITDA | | | 6.0 | x | | | 6.4 | x | | | 6.8 | x | | | 7.2 | x |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '02E EBITDA | | | 6.8 | x | | | 7.3 | x | | | 7.7 | x | | | 8.2 | x |
|
| | PV of Cash Flow Stream | | $ | 78 | | | $ | 78 | | | $ | 78 | | | $ | 78 | |
| | PV of Perpetuity | | | 229 | | | | 250 | | | | 270 | | | | 291 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
10.5% | | Enterprise Value | | $ | 307 | | | $ | 328 | | | $ | 349 | | | $ | 369 | |
| | Less: Net Debt (10/31/00) | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | Equity Value | | $ | 270 | | | $ | 291 | | | $ | 311 | | | $ | 332 | |
| | Implied Price Per Share | | $ | 50.84 | | | $ | 54.76 | | | $ | 58.68 | | | $ | 62.60 | |
| | Implied FCF Growth in Perpetuity | | | 2.9 | % | | | 3.4 | % | | | 4.0 | % | | | 4.4 | % |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '01A EBITDA | | | 5.9 | x | | | 6.3 | x | | | 6.7 | x | | | 7.1 | x |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '02E EBITDA | | | 6.7 | x | | | 7.1 | x | | | 7.6 | x | | | 8.0 | x |

-31-
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
DRAFT
Consolidated DCF Analysis — September Projections
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | EBITDA Exit Multiple (2006 Exit) | |
Discount | | | | | |
| |
Rate | | | | | | 5.5x | | | 6.0x | | | 6.5x | | | 7.0x | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | PV of Cash Flow Stream | | $ | 74 | | | $ | 74 | | | $ | 74 | | | $ | 74 | |
| | PV of Perpetuity | | | 239 | | | | 260 | | | | 282 | | | | 304 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
9.5% | | Enterprise Value | | $ | 313 | | | $ | 335 | | | $ | 356 | | | $ | 378 | |
| | Less: Net Debt (10/31/00) | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | Equity Value | | $ | 276 | | | $ | 298 | | | $ | 319 | | | $ | 341 | |
| | Implied Price Per Share | | $ | 51.96 | | | $ | 56.05 | | | $ | 60.14 | | | $ | 64.22 | |
| | Implied FCF Growth in Perpetuity | | | 2.0 | % | | | 2.5 | % | | | 3.0 | % | | | 3.5 | % |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '01A EBITDA | | | 6.0 | x | | | 6.4 | x | | | 6.9 | x | | | 7.3 | x |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '02E EBITDA | | | 7.2 | x | | | 7.7 | x | | | 8.2 | x | | | 8.7 | x |
|
| | PV of Cash Flow Stream | | $ | 73 | | | $ | 73 | | | $ | 73 | | | $ | 73 | |
| | PV of Perpetuity | | | 234 | | | | 255 | | | | 277 | | | | 298 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
10.0% | | Enterprise Value | | $ | 307 | | | $ | 329 | | | $ | 350 | | | $ | 371 | |
| | Less: Net Debt (10/31/00) | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | Equity Value | | $ | 270 | | | $ | 292 | | | $ | 313 | | | $ | 334 | |
| | Implied Price Per Share | | $ | 50.92 | | | $ | 54.93 | | | $ | 58.94 | | | $ | 62.95 | |
| | Implied FCF Growth in Perpetuity | | | 2.4 | % | | | 3.0 | % | | | 3.5 | % | | | 4.0 | % |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '01A EBITDA | | | 5.9 | x | | | 6.3 | x | | | 6.7 | x | | | 7.2 | x |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '02E EBITDA | | | 7.1 | x | | | 7.6 | x | | | 8.0 | x | | | 8.5 | x |
|
| | PV of Cash Flow Stream | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 72 | | | $ | 72 | |
| | PV of Perpetuity | | | 230 | | | | 250 | | | | 271 | | | | 292 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
10.5% | | Enterprise Value | | $ | 302 | | | $ | 323 | | | $ | 344 | | | $ | 365 | |
| | Less: Net Debt (10/31/00) | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | | | | 37 | |
| | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | Equity Value | | $ | 265 | | | $ | 286 | | | $ | 307 | | | $ | 328 | |
| | Implied Price Per Share | | $ | 49.91 | | | $ | 53.84 | | | $ | 57.77 | | | $ | 61.70 | |
| | Implied FCF Growth in Perpetuity | | | 2.9 | % | | | 3.5 | % | | | 4.0 | % | | | 4.4 | % |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '01A EBITDA | | | 5.8 | x | | | 6.2 | x | | | 6.6 | x | | | 7.0 | x |
| | Enterprise Value Multiple to FY '02E EBITDA | | | 6.9 | x | | | 7.4 | x | | | 7.9 | x | | | 8.4 | x |

-32-
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
DRAFT
WACC Analysis
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Unlevered Betas |
|
| | Current | | | Debt/ | | | | | |
| | Levered | | | Total | | | Unlevered | |
| | Beta(1) | | | Capital | | | Beta |
| |
| | |
| | |
| |
Average Comparable Company Beta | | | 0.59 | | | | 41.7 | % | | | 0.43 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Weighted Average Cost-of-Capital |
|
Capital Structure | | Cost of Equity | | | Cost of Debt | | | | | |
| |
| | |
| | | Wtd-Avg | |
Debt/ | | Debt/ | | | Relevered | | | Cost of | | | Before | | | After | | | Cost of | |
Capital | | Equity | | | Beta(2) | | | Equity | | | Tax | | | Tax | | | Capital | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
0% | | | 0 | % | | | 0.43 | | | | 10.2 | % | | | 8.00 | % | | | 4.96 | % | | | 10.2 | % |
10% | | | 11 | % | | | 0.46 | | | | 10.6 | % | | | 8.30 | % | | | 5.15 | % | | | 10.0 | % |
20% | | | 25 | % | | | 0.50 | | | | 11.1 | % | | | 8.60 | % | | | 5.33 | % | | | 9.9 | % |
30% | | | 43 | % | | | 0.55 | | | | 11.7 | % | | | 8.90 | % | | | 5.52 | % | | | 9.8 | % |
40% | | | 67 | % | | | 0.61 | | | | 12.5 | % | | | 9.20 | % | | | 5.70 | % | | | 9.8 | % |
50% | | | 100 | % | | | 0.70 | | | | 13.6 | % | | | 9.50 | % | | | 5.89 | % | | | 9.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Assumptions |
|
Marginal Tax Rate | | | 38.0 | % | | Risk Free Rate of Return(3) | | | 4.71 | % | | Market Risk Premium(4) | | | 12.70 | % |
(1) | | Based on average comparable company betas. Source: BARRA. |
(2) | | Relevered Beta = Unlevered Beta * { 1 + (Debt * (1 — tax rate) / Equity) }. |
(3) | | Equals current yield on ten year U.S. Treasury Notes. |
(4) | | Source: Ibbotson Associates. |

-33-
DRAFT
Comparable Companies
Analysis

-34-
Comparable Companies Analysis
DRAFT
Valuation Summary
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Relevant | | | Implied | | | Less: | | | Implied Equity | |
Relevant Measure | | Multiple Range | | | Enterprise Value | | | Net Debt | | | Value per Share | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
LTM EBITDA | | $ | 42.1 | | | | 5.5x | | | | — | | | | 7.0x | | | | | | | $ | 232 | | | | — | | | $ | 295 | | | $ | 37.1 | | | $ | 36.50 | | | | — | | | $ | 48.36 | |
2001E EBITDA | | | 43.9 | | | | 5.0x | | | | — | | | | 6.5x | | | | | | | | 220 | | | | — | | | | 285 | | | | 37.1 | | | | 34.24 | | | | — | | | | 46.60 | |
2002E EBITDA | | | 47.1 | | | | 4.5x | | | | — | | | | 6.0x | | | | | | | | 212 | | | | — | | | | 283 | | | | 37.1 | | | | 32.85 | | | | — | | | | 46.12 | |
LTM EPS | | $ | 3.73 | | | | 11.5x | | | | — | | | | 15.5x | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 42.92 | | | | — | | | $ | 57.85 | |
2001E EPS | | | 3.90 | | | | 10.0x | | | | — | | | | 13.5x | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 38.95 | | | | — | | | | 52.59 | |
2002E EPS | | | 4.11 | | | | 9.0x | | | | — | | | | 12.0x | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 37.00 | | | | — | | | | 49.33 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Implied Compco Range(1) | $ | 37.00 | | | | — | | | $ | 49.00 | |
Plus: Median Minority Closeout Premium (22%)(2) | | 8.00 | | | | — | | | | 11.00 | |
|
| | | | | | |
| |
Implied Valuation Range | | 45.00 | | | | — | | | | 60.00 | |
(1) | | Implied Compco range does not include change of control premium. Range based on median of each column rounded to the nearest dollar. |
(2) | | Reflects median premium paid since 1/1/97 for close-outs of minority stakes by acquirers with at least 50% ownership prior to bid. |

-35-
Comparable Companies Analysis
DRAFT
Comparable Company Analysis
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Enterprise Value/EBITDA | | | Price/EPS | | | Ent. Value/ | |
| | | Price | | | Market | | | Enterprise | | |
| | |
| | | 7 Yr. Avg. | |
Name | | 12/3/01 | | | Value | | | Value | | | LTM | | | CY01E | | | CY02E | | | LTM | | | CY01E | | | CY02E | | | LTM EBITDA | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Chemicals Distribution | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hawkins | | $ | 7.85 | | | $ | 80.6 | | | $ | 79.5 | | | | 6.0x | | | | 6.3x | | | NA | | | 11.6x | | | | 12.2x | | | NA | | | 5.7x | |
| Aceto | | | 9.35 | | | | 60.9 | | | | 55.4 | | | | 9.9x | | | NA | | NA | | NM | | NA | | NA | | | 5.4x | |
| JLM Industries | | | 1.95 | | | | 18.2 | | | | 33.1 | | | NA | | NA | | NA | | NM | | NM | | NA | | NA |
Industrial Distribution | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hughes Supply | | | 27.20 | | | | 667.8 | | | | 1,168.9 | | | | 9.6x | | | | 9.1x | | | | 7.4x | | | | 15.6x | | | | 14.5x | | | | 12.5x | | | | 6.6x | |
| Applied Ind. Technologies | | | 18.50 | | | | 373.1 | | | | 459.0 | | | | 6.3x | | | | 7.1x | | | | 6.1x | | | | 15.5x | | | | 15.9x | | | | 13.6x | | | | 6.5x | |
| Crane Group(1) | | | 4.22 | | | | 209.7 | | | | 336.9 | | | | 6.9x | | | | 3.0x | | | | 4.8x | | | | 17.6x | | | | 8.5x | | | | 11.3x | | | NA |
| Kaman Corp. | | | 14.14 | | | | 322.9 | | | | 311.0 | | | | 9.7x | | | NA | | NA | | | 9.2x | | | | 10.0x | | | | 12.2x | | | | 6.8x | |
| Lawson Products | | | 26.89 | | | | 262.8 | | | | 279.2 | | | | 7.7x | | | | 8.8x | | | NA | | | 15.4x | | | | 18.6x | | | NA | | | 5.8x | |
| Huttig Building Products | | | 5.40 | | | | 106.0 | | | | 188.5 | | | | 4.9x | | | | 3.7x | | | NA | | | 11.7x | | | | 11.7x | | | | 9.0x | | | NA |
| Noland | | | 25.96 | | | | 92.8 | | | | 128.4 | | | | 8.8x | | | | 10.1x | | | NA | | | 15.5x | | | | 16.4x | | | NA | | | 6.5x | |
Other Distribution | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acuity Brands | | | 13.80 | | | | 566.7 | | | | 1,165.2 | | | | 5.8x | | | NA | | NA | | | 11.0x | | | NA | | NA | | NA |
| SCP Pool Corp. | | | 25.85 | | | | 650.9 | | | | 706.8 | | | | 8.2x | | | | 11.8x | | | | 10.2x | | | | 19.0x | | | | 19.6x | | | | 16.9x | | | | 10.4x | |
| Aviall | | | 5.18 | | | | 95.8 | | | | 226.5 | | | | 5.5x | | | | 5.4x | | | | 4.7x | | | | 8.4x | | | | 10.4x | | | | 11.5x | | | | 8.5x | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | Mean | | | 7.4x | | | | 7.2x | | | | 6.7x | | | | 13.7x | | | | 13.8x | | | | 12.4x | | | | 6.9x | |
| | | | | | | | | | Median | | | 7.3x | | | | 7.1x | | | | 6.1x | | | | 15.4x | | | | 13.4x | | | | 12.2x | | | | 6.5x | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
NCH Corporation(2) | | $ | 46.75 | | | $ | 249 | | | $ | 286 | | | | 6.8x | | | | 6.5x | | | | 6.1x | | | | 12.5x | | | | 12.0x | | | | 11.4x | | | | 6.2x | |
NCH Corporation(2) | | $ | 39.19 | | | $ | 209 | | | $ | 246 | | | | 5.8x | | | | 5.6x | | | | 5.2x | | | | 10.5x | | | | 10.1x | | | | 9.5x | | | | | |
Note: | | Estimates taken from First Call and other research sources. Comparable companies selected were those with business models similar to that of the Company. However, a number of companies were excluded whose financial characteristics were substantially different from NCH. |
(1) | | 2002 estimates refer to the fiscal year ending 6/30/02. |
(2) | | NCH multiples based on management estimates. |

-36-
Comparable Companies Analysis
DRAFT
Comparable Company Analysis(Cont’d)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | LTM | | | Wkg Cap as | | | | | | | Net Debt as | | | 52 Wk Avg. | | | | | | | | | |
| | | EBITDA | | | % of LTM | | | IBES Est. | | | % of Total | | | Daily Volume | | | Total Float | | | Float as % of | |
Name | | Margin | | | Revenue | | | LTG Rate | | | Capital | | | ('000s) | | | (MMs) | | | Total Shares | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Chemicals Distribution | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hawkins | | | 12.7 | % | | | 23.2 | % | | NA | | NM | | | 5.9 | | | | 7.3 | | | | 71.0 | % |
| Aceto | | | 1.8 | % | | | 23.1 | % | | NA | | NM | | | 7.6 | | | | 5.9 | | | | 90.0 | % |
| JLM Industries | | NA | | | 3.0 | % | | | 16.5 | % | | | 31.9 | % | | | 16.3 | | | | 5.9 | | | | 63.1 | % |
Industrial Distribution | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Hughes Supply | | | 3.8 | % | | | 21.0 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | 45.8 | % | | | 88.8 | | | | 22.3 | | | | 94.1 | % |
| Applied Ind. Technologies | | | 4.6 | % | | | 17.3 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | | 20.5 | % | | | 36.5 | | | | 14.6 | | | | 75.9 | % |
| Crane Group | | | 6.4 | % | | | 18.0 | % | | NA | | | 39.4 | % | | | 80.5 | | | | 41.5 | | | | 83.6 | % |
| Kaman Corp. | | | 3.4 | % | | | 32.2 | % | | | 30.0 | % | | NM | | | 7.1 | | | | 20.8 | | | | 92.6 | % |
| Lawson Products | | | 9.8 | % | | | 29.3 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | 8.9 | % | | | 53.2 | | | | 5.0 | | | | 51.6 | % |
| Huttig Building Products | | | 4.0 | % | | | 9.6 | % | | | 11.0 | % | | | 48.8 | % | | | 26.7 | | | | 12.4 | | | | 63.1 | % |
| Noland | | | 3.1 | % | | | 14.7 | % | | NA | | | 19.9 | % | | | 1.0 | | | | 0.5 | | | | 13.1 | % |
Other Distribution | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acuity Brands | | | 10.2 | % | | | 5.9 | % | | NA | | | 60.3 | % | | NA | | NA | | NA |
| SCP Pool | | | 10.4 | % | | | 15.3 | % | | | 20.0 | % | | | 25.4 | % | | | 184.5 | | | | 24.4 | | | | 97.9 | % |
| Aviall | | | 8.0 | % | | | 34.4 | % | | | 29.5 | % | | | 39.2 | % | | | 94.8 | | | | 18.2 | | | | 98.4 | % |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Mean | | | 6.5 | % | | | 19.0 | % | | | 16.7 | % | | | 34.0 | % | | | 50.2 | | | | 14.9 | | | | 74.5 | % |
Median | | | 5.5 | % | | | 18.0 | % | | | 15.3 | % | | | 35.5 | % | | | 31.6 | | | | 13.5 | | | | 79.7 | % |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
NCH Corporation | | | 6.5 | % | | | 34.9 | % | | NA | | | 10.7 | % | | | 8.0 | | | | 2.3 | | | | 42.2 | % |

-37-
DRAFT
Comparable Acquisitions
Analysis

-38-
Comparable Acquisitions Analysis
DRAFT
Valuation Summary
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Relevant | | | Implied | | | Less: | | | Implied Equity | |
Relevant Measure | | Multiple Range | | | Enterprise Value | | | Net Debt | | | Value per Share | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
LTM Revenue | $652.8 | | | 0.3x | | | | — | | | | 0.5x | | | $ | 196 | | | | — | | | $ | 326 | | | $ | 37.1 | | | $ | 29.91 | | | | — | | | $ | 54.50 | |
LTM EBITDA | 42.1 | | | 6.0x | | | | — | | | | 8.0x | | | | 253 | | | | — | | | | 337 | | | | 37.1 | | | | 40.60 | | | | — | | | | 56.46 | |
LTM EPS | 3.73 | | | 14.0x | | | | — | | | | 16.0x | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 52.25 | | | | — | | | | 59.71 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied Valuation Range(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 41.00 | | | | — | | | $ | 56.00 | |
(1) | | Range based on median of each column rounded to the nearest dollar. |

-39-
Comparable Acquisitions Analysis
DRAFT
Comparable Acquisitions Analysis($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity | |
| | | | | | Purchase Price | | | Adjusted Purchase Price/ | | | Purchase Price/ | |
Date | | Acquirer Name/ | | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Ann'd. | | Target Name | | | Adjusted | | | Equity | | | Sales | | | EBITDA | | | Net Income | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
4/02/01 | | Kohlberg Investors/ | | $ | 120.7 | | | $ | 120.7 | | | | 0.2x | | | | 4.0x | | | NM |
| | Katy Industries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
1/22/01 | | SCP Pool Corp/ | | | 48.0 | | | NA | | | | 0.4x | | | NA | | NA |
| | Hughes Supply | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
1/22/01 | | Sysco/ | | | 223.1 | | | | 184.9 | | | | 0.6x | | | | 8.1x | | | | 16.6x | |
| | Guest Supply | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
11/10/00 | | Vopak NV/ | | | 482.2 | | | | 444.0 | | | | 0.4x | | | | 6.0x | | | | 11.7x | |
| | Ellis & Everard | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
9/5/00 | | Brenntag (Stinnes AG)/ | | | 401.6 | | | | 245.3 | | | | 0.4x | | | | 6.7x | | | | 10.6x | |
| | Holland Chemical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
8/01/00 | | Hagemeyer/ | | | 198.5 | | | | 198.5 | | | | 0.4x | | | NA | | NA |
| | Pacific Dunlop-Electrical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
7/21/00 | | Rexel/ | | | 725.0 | | | | 668.7 | | | | 0.4x | | | | 8.1x | | | | 13.7x | |
| | Westburne | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
7/22/99 | | Mgmt.-led investor group/ | | | 185.4 | | | | 185.4 | | | | 0.6x | | | | 7.0x | | | | 17.5x | |
| | White Cap Industries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
5/07/99 | | Unidare/ | | | 60.1 | | | | 54.9 | | | | 0.7x | | | | 9.7x | | | | 18.0x | |
| | Oklahoma Rig and Supply | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | Mean | | | 0.5x | | | | 7.1x | | | | 14.7x | |
| | | | | | | | | | Median | | | 0.4x | | | | 7.0x | | | | 15.1x | |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
Note: | | All figures based on LTM or latest available data. Comparable transactions selected were those with target company business models similar to that of the Company. However, a number of companies were excluded whose financial characteristics were substantially different from NCH. Transactions over $1.0 billion excluded. |

-40-
DRAFT
Leveraged Buyout Analysis

-41-
Leveraged Buyout Analysis
DRAFT
Assumptions — Levy Group Equity Not Rolled
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sources |
|
| | Amort. Pd | | | Rate | | | Amount | | | Percent | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Cash on Balance Sheet | | | | | | | 4.0 | % | | $ | 78.8 | | | | 19 | % |
Amortizing Bank Debt | | | 7.0 | | | | 6.9 | % | | | 85.7 | | | | 21 | % |
Revolver | | | | | | | 7.5 | % | | | 52.5 | | | | 13 | % |
Inherited Debt | | | | | | | 0.0 | % | | | 115.9 | | | | 28 | % |
High Yield Debt | | | | | | | 10.0 | % | | | 0.0 | | | | 0 | % |
Equity | | | | | | | | | | | 75.6 | | | | 19 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| |
Total | | | | | | | | | | $ | 408.6 | | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| |
Initial Debt / Total Initial Book Capitalization | | | | | | | | | | | 77% | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Adjusted Purchase Price |
|
Per Share Purchase Price | | | 47.50 | |
Shares Outstanding (MM) (10/31/01) | | | 5.3 | |
| |
| |
Equity Purchase Price | | $ | 252.1 | |
Plus: Net Debt @ 10/31/01 | | | 37.1 | |
| |
| |
Adjusted Purchase Price | | $ | 289.2 | |
Shares Already Owned by Buyer | | | 0.0 | |
| |
| |
Adjusted Equity Purchase Price | | $ | 252.1 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Uses |
|
| | Amt. | | | % | |
| |
| | |
| |
W/C Cash | | $ | 24.2 | | | | 6 | % |
Inherited Debt | | | 115.9 | | | | 28 | % |
Cash Paid to Seller | | | 252.1 | | | | 62 | % |
Financing Transaction Costs | | | 1.4 | | | | 0 | % |
Other Transaction Costs | | | 15.0 | | | | 4 | % |
Rolled Equity | | | 0.0 | | | | 0 | % |
| |
| | |
| |
Total | | $ | 408.6 | | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Write-Up/Goodwill |
|
Equity Purchase Price | | | | | | | 252.1 | |
Tangible Book Value | | | | | | | 230.7 | |
Original Deferred Taxes Eliminated | | | | | | | — | |
Tang. B.V. + Def. Taxes Eliminated | | | | | | | 230.7 | |
Excess of PP over BV + Def. Taxes Eliminated | | | | | | | 21.4 | |
Write-Up of PP&E Given | | 0.0% of Excess | | | — | |
New Deferred Taxes Created | | | | | | | — | |
Goodwill (Net of Original Goodwill) | | | | | | | 21.4 | |

-42-
Leveraged Buyout Analysis
DRAFT
IRR Analysis — Levy Group Equity Not Rolled — April Projections
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 5.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | (1.2 | %) | | | (2.6 | %) | | | (8.5 | %) | | | (14.6 | %) | | | (21.1 | %) | | | (28.4 | %) | | | (36.6 | %) | | | (47.0 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 8.8 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | 4.1 | % | | | 0.2 | % | | | (3.8 | %) | | | (8.0 | %) | | | (12.6 | %) | | | (17.5 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 13.4 | % | | | 12.8 | % | | | 10.1 | % | | | 7.4 | % | | | 4.6 | % | | | 1.7 | % | | | (1.2 | %) | | | (4.3 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 10.9 | % | | | 9.7 | % | | | 4.6 | % | | | (0.5 | %) | | | (5.7 | %) | | | (11.1 | %) | | | (16.8 | %) | | | (22.8 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 16.2 | % | | | 15.4 | % | | | 12.0 | % | | | 8.5 | % | | | 5.1 | % | | | 1.6 | % | | | (2.0 | %) | | | (5.8 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 18.2 | % | | | 17.7 | % | | | 15.2 | % | | | 12.7 | % | | | 10.3 | % | | | 7.8 | % | | | 5.2 | % | | | 2.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 20.8 | % | | | 19.7 | % | | | 15.1 | % | | | 10.5 | % | | | 5.9 | % | | | 1.2 | % | | | (3.5 | %) | | | (8.3 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 22.3 | % | | | 21.6 | % | | | 18.4 | % | | | 15.3 | % | | | 12.2 | % | | | 9.0 | % | | | 5.9 | % | | | 2.7 | % |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 22.4 | % | | | 21.9 | % | | | 19.5 | % | | | 17.3 | % | | | 15.0 | % | | | 12.7 | % | | | 10.4 | % | | | 8.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 7x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 29.3 | % | | | 28.3 | % | | | 23.9 | % | | | 19.6 | % | | | 15.4 | % | | | 11.1 | % | | | 6.9 | % | | | 2.7 | % |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 27.6 | % | | | 26.9 | % | | | 24.0 | % | | | 21.0 | % | | | 18.1 | % | | | 15.2 | % | | | 12.3 | % | | | 9.5 | % |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 26.1 | % | | | 25.5 | % | | | 23.3 | % | | | 21.2 | % | | | 19.0 | % | | | 16.9 | % | | | 14.8 | % | | | 12.7 | % |

-43-
Leveraged Buyout Analysis
DRAFT
IRR Analysis — Levy Group Equity Not Rolled — July Projections
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 5.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | (21.5 | %) | | | (23.3 | %) | | | (32.1 | %) | | | (42.7 | %) | | | (58.2 | %) | | | (132.2 | %) | | | (150.9 | %) | | | (160.7 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 0.3 | % | | | (0.8 | %) | | | (5.3 | %) | | | (10.1 | %) | | | (15.3 | %) | | | (21.1 | %) | | | (28.0 | %) | | | (36.9 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 8.8 | % | | | 8.1 | % | | | 5.1 | % | | | 2.1 | % | | | (1.1 | %) | | | (4.4 | %) | | | (8.0 | %) | | | (12.0 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | (5.4 | %) | | | (6.8 | %) | | | (13.1 | %) | | | (19.7 | %) | | | (27.0 | %) | | | (35.3 | %) | | | (45.7 | %) | | | (61.2 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 8.9 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | 4.2 | % | | | 0.3 | % | | | (3.8 | %) | | | (8.0 | %) | | | (12.5 | %) | | | (17.5 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 14.2 | % | | | 13.6 | % | | | 11.0 | % | | | 8.3 | % | | | 5.6 | % | | | 2.8 | % | | | (0.1 | %) | | | (3.1 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 6.6 | % | | | 5.3 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | (5.4 | %) | | | (11.0 | %) | | | (16.9 | %) | | | (23.2 | %) | | | (30.2 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 15.8 | % | | | 15.0 | % | | | 11.6 | % | | | 8.1 | % | | | 4.7 | % | | | 1.1 | % | | | (2.5 | %) | | | (6.3 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 18.8 | % | | | 18.2 | % | | | 15.8 | % | | | 13.4 | % | | | 10.9 | % | | | 8.5 | % | | | 6.0 | % | | | 3.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 7x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 16.3 | % | | | 15.2 | % | | | 10.4 | % | | | 5.5 | % | | | 0.7 | % | | | (4.2 | %) | | | (9.3 | %) | | | (14.6 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 21.7 | % | | | 20.9 | % | | | 17.7 | % | | | 14.6 | % | | | 11.4 | % | | | 8.3 | % | | | 5.1 | % | | | 1.8 | % |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 22.8 | % | | | 22.2 | % | | | 19.9 | % | | | 17.6 | % | | | 15.4 | % | | | 13.1 | % | | | 10.9 | % | | | 8.6 | % |

-44-
Leveraged Buyout Analysis
DRAFT
IRR Analysis — Levy Group Equity Not Rolled — September Projections
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Implied IRR at 5.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | (41.3 | %) | | | (44.4 | %) | | | (63.9 | %) | | | (140.7 | %) | | | (155.7 | %) | | | (164.6 | %) | | | (171.1 | %) | | | (176.2 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | (4.2 | %) | | | (5.3 | %) | | | (10.4 | %) | | | (15.9 | %) | | | (22.1 | %) | | | (29.6 | %) | | | (39.8 | %) | | | (59.7 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 6.2 | % | | | 5.5 | % | | | 2.3 | % | | | (1.0 | %) | | | (4.5 | %) | | | (8.3 | %) | | | (12.4 | %) | | | (17.1 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | (17.8 | %) | | | (19.6 | %) | | | (27.5 | %) | | | (36.8 | %) | | | (48.8 | %) | | | (70.6 | %) | | | (142.2 | %) | | | (155.3 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 5.4 | % | | | 4.5 | % | | | 0.4 | % | | | (3.8 | %) | | | (8.2 | %) | | | (12.9 | %) | | | (18.1 | %) | | | (24.1 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 12.1 | % | | | 11.5 | % | | | 8.7 | % | | | 5.9 | % | | | 3.0 | % | | | 0.1 | % | | | (3.1 | %) | | | (6.4 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | (3.2 | %) | | | (4.6 | %) | | | (10.6 | %) | | | (17.0 | %) | | | (23.9 | %) | | | (31.6 | %) | | | (40.7 | %) | | | (52.8 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 13.0 | % | | | 12.2 | % | | | 8.6 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | 1.3 | % | | | (2.5 | %) | | | (6.4 | %) | | | (10.6 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 17.0 | % | | | 16.4 | % | | | 13.9 | % | | | 11.4 | % | | | 8.8 | % | | | 6.3 | % | | | 3.6 | % | | | 0.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 7x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | $47.50 | | $48.00 | | $50.00 | | $52.00 | | $54.00 | | $56.00 | | $58.00 | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 8.0 | % | | | 6.8 | % | | | 1.6 | % | | | (3.8 | %) | | | (9.2 | %) | | | (14.9 | %) | | | (21.0 | %) | | | (27.6 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 19.3 | % | | | 18.5 | % | | | 15.2 | % | | | 12.0 | % | | | 8.7 | % | | | 5.4 | % | | | 2.1 | % | | | (1.4 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 21.2 | % | | | 20.6 | % | | | 18.3 | % | | | 16.0 | % | | | 13.6 | % | | | 11.3 | % | | | 9.0 | % | | | 6.6 | % |

-45-
Leveraged Buyout Analysis
DRAFT
Assumptions — Levy Group Equity Rolled
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sources |
|
| | Amort. Pd | | | Rate | | | Amount | | | Percent | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Cash on Balance Sheet | | | | | | | 4.0 | % | | $ | 78.8 | | | | 19 | % |
Amortizing Bank Debt | | | 7.0 | | | | 6.9 | % | | | 50.0 | | | | 12 | % |
Revolver | | | | | | | 7.5 | % | | | 18.7 | | | | 5 | % |
Inherited Debt | | | | | | | 0.0 | % | | | 115.9 | | | | 28 | % |
High Yield Debt | | | | | | | 10.0 | % | | | 0.0 | | | | 0 | % |
Equity | | | | | | | | | | | 144.5 | | | | 35 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| |
Total | | | | | | | | | | $ | 407.9 | | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| |
Initial Debt / Total Initial Book Capitalization | | | | | | | | | | | 60 | % | | | | |
| | | | |
Adjusted Purchase Price |
|
Per Share Purchase Price | $ | 47.50 | | |
Shares Outstanding (MM) (10/31/01) | | 5.3 | | |
|
| | |
Equity Purchase Price | $ | 24.2 | | |
Plus: Net Debt @ 10/31/01 | | 37.1 | | |
|
| | |
Adjusted Purchase Price | $ | 289.2 | | |
Shares Already Owned by Buyer | | 144.5 | | |
|
| | |
Adjusted Equity Purchase Price | $ | 107.7 | | |
| | | | | | | | |
Uses |
|
| | | Amt. | | | % | |
| | |
| | |
| |
W/C Cash | | | | $ | 24.2 | | | | 6 | % |
Inherited Debt | | | | $ | 115.9 | | | | 28 | % |
Cash Paid to Seller | | | | | 107.7 | | | | 26 | % |
Financing Transaction Costs | | | | | 0.7 | | | | 0 | % |
Other Transaction Costs | | | | | 15.0 | | | | 4 | % |
Rolled Equity | | | | | 144.5 | | | | 35 | % |
| | | |
| | |
| |
Total | | | | $ | 407.9 | | | | 100 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Write-Up/Goodwill |
|
Equity Purchase Price | | | | | | | 107.7 | |
Tangible Book Value | | | | | | | 230.7 | |
Original Deferred Taxes Eliminated | | | | | | | — | |
Tang. B.V. + Def. Taxes Eliminated | | | | | | | — | |
Excess of PP over BV + Def. Taxes Eliminated | | | | | | | — | |
Write-Up of PP&E Given | | 0.0% of Excess | | | — | |
New Deferred Taxes Created | | | | | | | — | |
Goodwill (Net of Original Goodwill) | | | | | | | — | |

-46-
Leveraged Buyout Analysis
DRAFT
IRR Analysis — Levy Group Equity Rolled — April Projections
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 5.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 1.8 | % | | | 1.1 | % | | | (1.6 | %) | | | (4.3 | %) | | | (6.9 | %) | | | (9.5 | %) | | | (11.9 | %) | | | (14.4 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 7.0 | % | | | 6.5 | % | | | 4.5 | % | | | 2.5 | % | | | 0.6 | % | | | (1.3 | %) | | | (3.1 | %) | | | (4.9 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 9.6 | % | | | 9.3 | % | | | 7.7 | % | | | 6.2 | % | | | 4.7 | % | | | 3.2 | % | | | 1.8 | % | | | 0.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 8.1 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | | 4.8 | % | | | 2.2 | % | | | (0.4 | %) | | | (2.8 | %) | | | (5.2 | %) | | | (7.5 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 11.2 | % | | | 10.7 | % | | | 8.7 | % | | | 6.8 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | 3.2 | % | | | 1.4 | % | | | (0.3 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 12.6 | % | | | 12.3 | % | | | 10.7 | % | | | 9.2 | % | | | 7.8 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | 3.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 13.8 | % | | | 13.1 | % | | | 10.5 | % | | | 7.9 | % | | | 5.4 | % | | | 3.0 | % | | | 0.7 | % | | | (1.6 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 15.0 | % | | | 14.5 | % | | | 12.5 | % | | | 10.7 | % | | | 8.9 | % | | | 7.1 | % | | | 5.4 | % | | | 3.7 | % |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 15.3 | % | | | 15.0 | % | | | 13.5 | % | | | 12.0 | % | | | 10.6 | % | | | 9.2 | % | | | 7.9 | % | | | 6.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 7x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 18.9 | % | | | 18.3 | % | | | 15.6 | % | | | 13.1 | % | | | 10.6 | % | | | 8.2 | % | | | 5.9 | % | | | 3.7 | % |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 18.4 | % | | | 17.9 | % | | | 16.0 | % | | | 14.2 | % | | | 12.4 | % | | | 10.6 | % | | | 8.9 | % | | | 7.3 | % |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 17.8 | % | | | 17.4 | % | | | 16.0 | % | | | 14.5 | % | | | 13.1 | % | | | 11.8 | % | | | 10.5 | % | | | 9.2 | % |

-47-
Leveraged Buyout Analysis
DRAFT
IRR Analysis — Levy Group Equity Rolled — July Projections
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 5.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | (7.0 | %) | | | (7.7 | %) | | | (10.6 | %) | | | (13.4 | %) | | | (16.2 | %) | | | (19.0 | %) | | | (21.7 | %) | | | (24.4 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 2.5 | % | | | 2.0 | % | | | (0.1 | %) | | | (2.1 | %) | | | (4.1 | %) | | | (6.1 | %) | | | (8.0 | %) | | | (10.0 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 7.0 | % | | | 6.6 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | 3.4 | % | | | 1.9 | % | | | 0.4 | % | | | (1.1 | %) | | | (2.6 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | (0.2 | %) | | | (0.9 | %) | | | (3.7 | %) | | | (6.4 | %) | | | (9.0 | %) | | | (11.6 | %) | | | (14.1 | %) | | | (16.6 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 7.0 | % | | | 6.5 | % | | | 4.5 | % | | | 2.5 | % | | | 0.6 | % | | | (1.3 | %) | | | (3.1 | %) | | | (4.9 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 10.1 | % | | | 9.8 | % | | | 8.2 | % | | | 6.7 | % | | | 5.2 | % | | | 3.8 | % | | | 2.4 | % | | | 1.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 5.1 | % | | | 2.4 | % | | | (0.2 | %) | | | (2.8 | %) | | | (5.3 | %) | | | (7.7 | %) | | | (10.1 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 11.0 | % | | | 10.5 | % | | | 8.5 | % | | | 6.6 | % | | | 4.7 | % | | | 2.9 | % | | | 1.2 | % | | | (0.6 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 13.0 | % | | | 12.6 | % | | | 11.1 | % | | | 9.6 | % | | | 8.2 | % | | | 6.8 | % | | | 5.4 | % | | | 4.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 7x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 11.2 | % | | | 10.5 | % | | | 7.8 | % | | | 5.2 | % | | | 2.7 | % | | | 0.3 | % | | | (2.0 | %) | | | (4.3 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 14.6 | % | | | 14.1 | % | | | 12.1 | % | | | 10.3 | % | | | 8.4 | % | | | 6.7 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | 3.3 | % |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 15.6 | % | | | 15.2 | % | | | 13.7 | % | | | 12.2 | % | | | 10.8 | % | | | 9.5 | % | | | 8.1 | % | | | 6.8 | % |

-48-
Leveraged Buyout Analysis
DRAFT
IRR Analysis — Levy Group Equity Rolled — September Projections
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 5.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | (13.1 | %) | | | (13.8 | %) | | | (16.9 | %) | | | (19.9 | %) | | | (22.8 | %) | | | (25.8 | %) | | | (28.8 | %) | | | (31.8 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 0.4 | % | | | (0.1 | %) | | | (2.2 | %) | | | (4.3 | %) | | | (6.4 | %) | | | (8.4 | %) | | | (10.4 | %) | | | (12.4 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 5.5 | % | | | 5.1 | % | | | 3.5 | % | | | 1.9 | % | | | 0.3 | % | | | (1.2 | %) | | | (2.7 | %) | | | (4.2 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | (5.6 | %) | | | (6.3 | %) | | | (9.2 | %) | | | (12.0 | %) | | | (14.7 | %) | | | (17.4 | %) | | | (20.1 | %) | | | (22.7 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 5.1 | % | | | 4.7 | % | | | 2.6 | % | | | 0.6 | % | | | (1.3 | %) | | | (3.3 | %) | | | (5.1 | %) | | | (7.0 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 8.9 | % | | | 8.5 | % | | | 6.9 | % | | | 5.4 | % | | | 3.9 | % | | | 2.4 | % | | | 1.0 | % | | | (0.4 | %) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 6.5x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 0.8 | % | | | 0.2 | % | | | (2.6 | %) | | | (5.3 | %) | | | (7.9 | %) | | | (10.5 | %) | | | (13.0 | %) | | | (15.4 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 9.3 | % | | | 8.9 | % | | | 6.9 | % | | | 4.9 | % | | | 3.0 | % | | | 1.2 | % | | | (0.6 | %) | | | (2.4 | %) |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 11.9 | % | | | 11.5 | % | | | 9.9 | % | | | 8.4 | % | | | 7.0 | % | | | 5.6 | % | | | 4.2 | % | | | 2.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Implied IRR at 7x Exit Multiple, 2006 Exit Year | |
| | | | | |
| |
Purchase Price | | | $47.50 | | | $48.00 | | | $50.00 | | | $52.00 | | | $54.00 | | | $56.00 | | | $58.00 | | | $60.00 | |
| | | 2004 | | | | 6.5 | % | | | 5.9 | % | | | 3.2 | % | | | 0.5 | % | | | (2.0 | %) | | | (4.5 | %) | | | (6.9 | %) | | | (9.2 | %) |
Exit | | | 2005 | | | | 13.1 | % | | | 12.6 | % | | | 10.6 | % | | | 8.7 | % | | | 6.9 | % | | | 5.1 | % | | | 3.4 | % | | | 1.7 | % |
Year | | | 2006 | | | | 14.5 | % | | | 14.2 | % | | | 12.7 | % | | | 11.2 | % | | | 9.8 | % | | | 8.4 | % | | | 7.0 | % | | | 5.7 | % |

-49-
DRAFT
Premiums Analysis
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 50 -
DRAFT
Premiums Analysis
Premiums Analysis: Minority Closeouts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | % Stock Premium Before |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity | | Announcement Date |
Date | | | | | | | | | | % Shares | | Purchase | |
|
Announced | | Target | | Acquiror | | Acquired | | Price ($MM) | | 1 Day | | 1 Week | | 4 Weeks |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Companies with Market Capitalizations greater than $1 Billion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
02/22/00 | | Ixnet | | Global Crossing Ltd. | | | 27.6 | % | | | 2,694.0 | | | | 18.1 | % | | | 22.8 | % | | | 25.9 | % |
06/20/97 | | Wheelabrator Technologies | | Waste Management | | | 34.6 | % | | | 2,671.5 | | | | 26.9 | % | | | 28.2 | % | | | 30.7 | % |
03/21/00 | | Travelers Property Casualty | | Citigroup | | | 15.0 | % | | | 2,423.0 | | | | 23.2 | % | | | 38.0 | % | | | 33.6 | % |
08/24/98 | | Tele-Commun Intl. | | Liberty Media | | | 18.9 | % | | | 2,165.7 | | | | -1.1 | % | | | -4.5 | % | | | -9.9 | % |
03/14/00 | | Howmet International | | Alcoa | | | 18.9 | % | | | 2,126.4 | | | | 13.5 | % | | | 12.8 | % | | | 14.3 | % |
03/27/98 | | International Specialty Prods. | | ISP Holdings | | | 20.1 | % | | | 1,789.6 | | | | 4.3 | % | | | 1.7 | % | | | 14.5 | % |
02/25/97 | | Fina | | Petrofina SA | | | 14.7 | % | | | 1,754.0 | | | | 19.7 | % | | | 18.5 | % | | | 21.5 | % |
11/12/99 | | Howmet International Inc. | | Cordant Technologies | | | 15.4 | % | | | 1,700.5 | | | | 20.9 | % | | | 18.8 | % | | | 38.1 | % |
07/09/00 | | Life Technologies | | Invitrogen Corp. | | | 27.9 | % | | | 1,525.9 | | | | 22.5 | % | | | 22.5 | % | | | 20.0 | % |
05/07/99 | | J Ray McDermott SA | | McDermott International | | | 37.0 | % | | | 1,391.3 | | | | 16.8 | % | | | 13.1 | % | | | 19.3 | % |
05/23/01 | | Unigraphics Solutions | | Electronic Data Systems | | | 21.5 | % | | | 1,224.0 | | | | 52.9 | % | | | 68.8 | % | | | 80.8 | % |
10/27/98 | | Citizens Corp. | | Allmerica Financial Corp. | | | 18.2 | % | | | 1,165.0 | | | | 20.6 | % | | | 17.2 | % | | | 20.9 | % |
03/24/99 | | Knoll | | Warburg, Pincus Ventures | | | 41.8 | % | | | 1,154.2 | | | | 83.6 | % | | | 51.9 | % | | | 46.4 | % |
12/01/99 | | Boise Cascade Office Products | | Boise Cascade Corp. | | | 19.5 | % | | | 1,086.8 | | | | 43.5 | % | | | 55.3 | % | | | 60.0 | % |
04/30/98 | | Mycogen Corp. | | Dow AgroSciences LLC | | | 37.8 | % | | | 1,067.3 | | | | 41.8 | % | | | 40.0 | % | | | 52.4 | % |
10/22/98 | | BA Merchant Svcs. | | Bank of America National Trust | | | 34.6 | % | | | 1,003.6 | | | | 47.1 | % | | | 56.2 | % | | | 42.0 | % |
| | | | | | Aggregate Median Premium: | | | | | | | | | | | 21.7 | % | | | 22.6 | % | | | 28.3 | % |
| | | | | | Implied Stock Price: | | | | | | | | | | $ | 47.68 | | | $ | 48.19 | | | $ | 56.45 | |
Companies with Market Capitalizations between $500MM-$1 Billion | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
10/27/00 | | Azurix Corp. | | Enron Corp. | | | 35.1 | % | | | 987.9 | | | | 135.1 | % | | | 135.1 | % | | | 134.1 | % |
07/17/98 | | West Teleservices Corp. | | Investor Group | | | 15.0 | % | | | 981.6 | | | | 25.9 | % | | | 29.2 | % | | | 22.8 | % |
01/13/97 | | Zurich Reinsurance Centre | | Zurich Versicherungs GmbH | | | 34.0 | % | | | 942.5 | | | | 17.1 | % | | | 18.5 | % | | | 11.6 | % |
03/21/99 | | Spelling Entertainment Group | | Viacom | | | 19.1 | % | | | 927.1 | | | | 8.3 | % | | | 43.2 | % | | | 54.5 | % |
05/05/97 | | Florida East Coast Industries | | St Joe Paper Co. | | | 46.0 | % | | | 923.3 | | | | 14.9 | % | | | 16.6 | % | | | 9.7 | % |
10/21/99 | | Student Loan Corporation | | Citigroup | | | 20.0 | % | | | 900.0 | | | | 11.5 | % | | | 11.6 | % | | | 0.8 | % |
05/14/97 | | Enron Global Power & Pipelines | | Enron Corp. | | | 49.4 | % | | | 884.7 | | | | 11.8 | % | | | 13.7 | % | | | 19.7 | % |
11/05/99 | | PEC Israel Economic Corp. | | Discount Investment Corp. | | | 43.7 | % | | | 784.4 | | | | 0.2 | % | | | 1.0 | % | | | 2.8 | % |
01/21/97 | | Mafco Consolidated Group | | Mafco Holdings | | | 15.0 | % | | | 778.5 | | | | 23.5 | % | | | 23.5 | % | | | 27.6 | % |
03/17/98 | | BET Holdings | | Investor Group | | | 42.1 | % | | | 717.2 | | | | 4.0 | % | | | 14.3 | % | | | 17.9 | % |
09/08/98 | | PEC Israel Economic Corp. | | Investor Group | | | 18.6 | % | | | 670.2 | | | | 60.0 | % | | | 55.7 | % | | | 50.5 | % |
01/31/00 | | Thermo BioAnalysis | | Thermo Instrument Systems | | | 29.9 | % | | | 592.4 | | | | 51.4 | % | | | 55.6 | % | | | 53.4 | % |
03/23/00 | | Homestead Village | | Security Capital Group | | | 27.7 | % | | | 585.0 | | | | 49.1 | % | | | 56.2 | % | | | 98.8 | % |
04/01/99 | | Aqua Alliance | | Vivendi SA | | | 22.2 | % | | | 562.8 | | | | 28.9 | % | | | 19.0 | % | | | 101.7 | % |
09/18/97 | | Guaranty National Corp. | | Orion Capital Corp. | | | 22.7 | % | | | 554.2 | | | | 10.8 | % | | | 23.9 | % | | | 27.7 | % |
06/02/97 | | Acordia | | Anthem | | | 39.2 | % | | | 540.0 | | | | 12.7 | % | | | 11.5 | % | | | 26.0 | % |
05/30/01 | | Bacou USA | | Bacou SA | | | 32.6 | % | | $ | 515.5 | | | | 21.8 | % | | | 17.3 | % | | | 11.3 | % |
| | | | | | Aggregate Median Premium: | | | | | | | | | | | 17.1 | % | | | 19.0 | % | | | 26.0 | % |
| | | | | | Implied Stock Price: | | | | | | | | | | $ | 45.88 | | | $ | 46.76 | | | $ | 55.43 | |
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 51 -
DRAFT
Premiums Analysis
Premiums Analysis: Minority Closeouts(Cont’d.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | % Stock Premium Before |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Equity | | Announcement Date |
Date | | | | | | | | | | % Shares | | Purchase | |
|
Announced | | Target | | Acquiror |
| Acquired | | Price ($MM) | | 1 Day | | 1 Week | | 4 Weeks |
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Companies with Market Capitalizations less than $500MM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
01/28/97 | | Calgene | | Monsanto Co. | | |
| 43.7 | % | | | 485.7 | |
| 62.0 | % | | | 60.0 | % | | | 60.0 | % |
01/22/98 | | BT Office Products Intl | | Koninklijke KNP BT NV | | |
| 30.0 | % | | | 460.2 | |
| 32.5 | % | | | 78.9 | % | | | 78.9 | % |
05/22/97 | | Chaparral Steel Co. | | Texas Industries | | |
| 18.7 | % | | | 446.8 | |
| 20.4 | % | | | 25.3 | % | | | 29.2 | % |
03/05/98 | | XLConnect Solutions | | Xerox Corp | | |
| 30.3 | % | | | 359.5 | |
| -11.1 | % | | | 15.1 | % | | | 22.1 | % |
01/19/00 | | Trigen Energy Corp. | | Elyo (Suez Lyonnaise des Eaux) | | |
| 50.4 | % | | | 296.2 | |
| 38.2 | % | | | 42.4 | % | | | 31.9 | % |
12/03/98 | | Banner Aerospace | | Fairchild Corp | | |
| 30.8 | % | | | 283.3 | |
| 25.7 | % | | | 41.9 | % | | | 40.8 | % |
10/16/98 | | BRC Holdings | | Affiliated Computer Services | | |
| 49.0 | % | | | 261.0 | |
| 17.2 | % | | | 16.9 | % | | | 15.2 | % |
01/08/98 | | Rayonier Timberlands LP | | Rayonier | | |
| 25.3 | % | | | 260.0 | |
| 11.2 | % | | | 25.3 | % | | | 17.5 | % |
12/14/00 | | NPC International | | O Gene Bicknell | | |
| 39.5 | % | | | 257.5 | |
| 11.3 | % | | | 6.8 | % | | | 32.0 | % |
02/20/97 | | NHP | | Apartment Investment & Mgmt Co. | | |
| 46.7 | % | | | 254.6 | |
| 28.3 | % | | | 25.2 | % | | | 16.9 | % |
05/21/99 | | ThermoSpectra (Thermo Instr) | | Thermo Instrument Systems | | |
| 14.5 | % | | | 251.6 | |
| 39.1 | % | | | 43.8 | % | | | 61.0 | % |
09/23/98 | | J&L Specialty Steel | | Usinor SA | | |
| 46.5 | % | | | 247.1 | |
| 100.0 | % | | | 112.5 | % | | | 37.8 | % |
10/05/98 | | Insignia Properties Trust | | Apartment Investment & Mgmt Co | | |
| 25.0 | % | | | 243.3 | |
| 7.5 | % | | | 7.5 | % | | | 0.0 | % |
11/12/98 | | Aquila Gas Pipeline Corp. | | UtiliCorp United | | |
| 18.4 | % | | | 235.2 | |
| 23.1 | % | | | 17.4 | % | | | 68.4 | % |
10/21/98 | | Capital Factors Holdings | | Union Planters Bank | | |
| 12.7 | % | | | 221.0 | |
| 4.5 | % | | | 9.0 | % | | | 2.9 | % |
04/16/97 | | Steck-Vaughn Publishing Corp. | | Harcourt General | | |
| 17.0 | % | | | 215.9 | |
| 21.7 | % | | | 32.6 | % | | | 24.2 | % |
07/20/00 | | JLK Direct Distribution | | Kennametal | | |
| 17.0 | % | | | 214.5 | |
| 48.9 | % | | | 94.4 | % | | | 68.7 | % |
06/03/97 | | Faulding | | FH Faulding & Co Ltd. | | |
| 38.0 | % | | | 203.7 | |
| 25.6 | % | | | 22.7 | % | | | 46.0 | % |
04/12/99 | | Meadowcraft | | Investor Group | | |
| 27.0 | % | | | 197.1 | |
| 65.0 | % | | | 63.3 | % | | | 77.8 | % |
12/08/99 | | Robertson-Ceco Corp. | | Heico Companies LLC | | |
| 30.8 | % | | | 185.3 | |
| 46.0 | % | | | 43.8 | % | | | 41.5 | % |
01/19/00 | | Conning Corp. | | Metropolitan Life Insurance Co | | |
| 43.4 | % | | | 177.3 | |
| 15.6 | % | | | 38.9 | % | | | 52.1 | % |
07/27/00 | | Brookdale Living Communities | | Investor Group | | |
| 20.5 | % | | | 176.6 | |
| 1.7 | % | | | 2.5 | % | | | 4.7 | % |
01/20/98 | | NACT Telecommunications | | World Access | | |
| 39.0 | % | | | 149.9 | |
| 12.0 | % | | | 12.5 | % | | | 16.7 | % |
05/05/99 | | Thermo Power Corp. | | Thermo Electron Corp. | | |
| 30.7 | % | | | 145.5 | |
| 5.5 | % | | | -1.5 | % | | | 41.2 | % |
12/15/99 | | ThermoLase Corp. | | Thermo Electron Corp. | | |
| 31.1 | % | | | 125.7 | |
| 15.0 | % | | | 28.6 | % | | | 45.7 | % |
10/20/99 | | Thermoretec Corp. | | Thermo Electron Corp. | | |
| 44.6 | % | | | 124.5 | |
| 27.3 | % | | | 33.3 | % | | | 34.9 | % |
07/09/97 | | Seaman Furniture | | Investor Group | | |
| 33.1 | % | | | 122.5 | |
| 21.5 | % | | | 25.3 | % | | | 21.5 | % |
10/20/99 | | Randers Killam Gr | | Thermo Electron Corp. | | |
| 8.8 | % | | | 116.5 | |
| 12.5 | % | | | 12.5 | % | | | 33.3 | % |
| | | | Median Premium: | | | | | | | | | | |
| 21.6 | % | | | 25.3 | % | | | 34.1 | % |
| | | | Implied Stock Price: | | | | | | | | | |
| $ | 47.64 | | | $ | 49.23 | | | $ | 59.02 | |
| | | | All Companies Median Premium: | | | | | | | | | | |
| 21.5 | % | | | 23.9 | % | | | 30.7 | % |
| | | | Implied Stock Price: | | | | | | | | | |
| $ | 47.60 | | | $ | 48.68 | | | $ | 57.50 | |
![[Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 52 -
DRAFT
Financial Projections
![[Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 53 -
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Overview of Internal Budgeting Process
| | | |
• | Before 2001, the Company’s annual budgeting process was a loosely coordinated event in which not all divisional managers participated |
|
| • | DrKW has only received a complete set of budgets resulting from the most recent internal budgeting process, which was completed in March 2001 (the “March 2001 Plan”) |
|
| | — | For the fiscal year 2000 process, a substantial amount of data is missing |
|
• | The March 2001 Plan contains the following information: |
|
| • | Fiscal year 2001 budgets that were prepared a year prior (the “2001 Internal Budget”) |
|
| • | Interim fiscal year 2001 estimates (“9 Months Annualized Financials”), based on nine months’ actual results |
|
| • | Budgets for fiscal years 2002 and 2004 |
|
• | The 9 Months Annualized Financials proved to be consistently lower than the 2001 Internal Budget |
|
• | The 2002 Internal Budget contained in the March 2001 Plan is substantially similar to the consolidated management projections prepared in April 2001 |
|
| • | Revenue falls approximately 3% |
|
| • | Operating income increases 1%, possibly due to differences in cost allocation |
![[Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 54 -
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Comparison of Projections($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2001 | | Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2002 |
| |
| |
|
| | Internal Budget | | 9 Months | | | | | | Internal Budget | | Management | | | | |
| | at Beg. of Yr.(1) | | Annualized(2) | | % Difference | | at Beg. of Yr.(1) | | 9/01 Projections | | % Difference |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Revenue | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chemical Specialties | | NA | | $ | 169.9 | | | NA | | $ | 184.7 | | | $ | 166.1 | | | | (10.1 | %) |
Plumbmaster | | | 86.2 | | | | 77.8 | | | | (9.8 | %) | | | 80.9 | | | | 116.2 | | | | 43.6 | % |
Partsmaster | | | 46.1 | | | | 42.6 | | | | (7.5 | %) | | | 45.7 | | | | 44.9 | | | | (1.7 | %) |
RPG | | | 24.1 | | | | 27.6 | | | | 14.6 | % | | | 28.4 | | | | 30.0 | | | | 5.5 | % |
Landmark | | | 42.7 | | | | 41.3 | | | | (3.2 | %) | | | 39.7 | | | | 44.4 | | | | 11.8 | % |
Western Europe | | | 203.3 | | | | 155.1 | | | | (23.7 | %) | | | 170.0 | | | | 148.4 | | | | (12.7 | %) |
Eastern Europe | | | 34.6 | | | | 26.3 | | | | (24.1 | %) | | | 32.0 | | | | 27.3 | | | | (14.7 | %) |
Latin America | | | 37.4 | | | | 36.2 | | | | (3.3 | %) | | | 45.8 | | | | 37.3 | | | | (18.5 | %) |
Asia | | | 29.2 | | | | 27.9 | | | | (4.5 | %) | | | 32.2 | | | | 27.5 | | | | (14.5 | %) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | NA | | $ | 604.6 | | | NA | | $ | 659.4 | | | $ | 642.1 | | | | (2.7 | %) |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Chemical Specialties | | NA | | $ | 16.8 | | | NA | | $ | 18.9 | | | $ | 14.1 | | | | (25.5 | %) |
Plumbmaster | | | 4.5 | | | | 5.0 | | | | 9.4 | % | | | 3.6 | | | | 6.9 | | | | 91.0 | % |
Partsmaster | | | 8.2 | | | | 5.0 | | | | (38.7 | %) | | | 7.2 | | | | 4.5 | | | | (37.6 | %) |
RPG | | | 3.7 | | | | 3.8 | | | | 1.4 | % | | | 4.2 | | | | 4.7 | | | | 10.9 | % |
Landmark | | | 2.3 | | | | 1.1 | | | | (50.5 | %) | | | 0.9 | | | | — | | | | (100.0 | %) |
Western Europe | | | 11.6 | | | | 5.4 | | | | (53.5 | %) | | | 6.6 | | | | 19.3 | | | | 192.6 | % |
Eastern Europe | | | 4.9 | | | | 2.8 | | | | (41.5 | %) | | | 5.8 | | | | 6.1 | | | | 5.8 | % |
Latin America | | | 6.8 | | | | 3.2 | | | | (52.6 | %) | | | 8.2 | | | | 2.6 | | | | (68.4 | %) |
Asia | | | 4.1 | | | | 3.3 | | | | (20.5 | %) | | | 4.7 | | | | 2.6 | | | | (44.1 | %) |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Total | | NA | | $ | 46.4 | | | NA | | $ | 60.1 | | | $ | 60.8 | | | | 1.1 | % |
Note: Operating income excludes unallocated corporate overhead expenses.(1) Projections made during the fourth quarter of the previous fiscal year.(2) Estimates made during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2001, utilizing nine months of actual results.![[Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 55 -
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Overview of Management Projections
| | |
• | In April 2001, Company management prepared its first set of projections for all operating segments on a consolidated basis |
|
| • | Management has advised that these were prepared independently of plans previously prepared by divisional managers |
|
• | The projections were subsequently revised by management in July 2001 to reflect deteriorating results and softening economic conditions |
|
| • | The April projections were prepared before the Company’s fourth quarter results were available |
|
| • | Revisions were made partly in response to the shortfall in NCH’s fourth quarter results |
|
| • | The largest downward revision occurred in Chemical Specialties, which management attributed to a softening construction market, increasing price sensitivity by customers and an ongoing trend of vendor consolidation |
|
• | The projections were revised again in mid-September in response to the September 11 attacks |
|
| • | Management felt that NCH would likely suffer in the short-term from a general slowdown in business activity as well as reduced productivity from its direct salespeople |
|
| • | Downward revisions focused more heavily on the Company’s performance in 2002, with performance in 2003 and beyond consistent with the July projections, except in Western Europe |
|
• | The April 2001 projections result in discounted cash flow values approximately 7% to 8% higher than those resulting from the mid-September 2001 projections |
|
| • | The July 2001 projections result in discounted cash flow values approximately 5% to 6% higher than the September ranges |
![[Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 56-
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Projection Comparison — Consolidated($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(FY Ended April 30) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAGR |
| | | 2001A | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | '01 - '06 |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 649.6 | | | $ | 650.7 | | | $ | 673.2 | | | $ | 701.6 | | | $ | 725.2 | | | $ | 751.4 | | | | 3.0 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 642.1 | | | | 647.2 | | | | 669.6 | | | | 697.4 | | | | 727.0 | | | | 2.3 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 625.8 | | | | 647.3 | | | | 669.6 | | | | 697.4 | | | | 727.1 | | | | 2.3 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | | ($8.6 | ) | | | ($26.0 | ) | | | ($32.0 | ) | | | ($27.8 | ) | | | ($24.4 | ) | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (16.3 | ) | | | 0.1 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0.1 | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 39.8 | | | $ | 41.7 | | | $ | 43.6 | | | $ | 46.4 | | | $ | 48.4 | | | $ | 50.7 | | | | 6.2 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 31.9 | | | | 36.3 | | | | 40.7 | | | | 44.7 | | | | 48.3 | | | | 5.0 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 29.5 | | | | 34.8 | | | | 39.2 | | | | 44.8 | | | | 48.4 | | | | 5.0 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | | ($9.8 | ) | | | ($7.3 | ) | | | ($5.7 | ) | | | ($3.7 | ) | | | ($2.4 | ) | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (2.4 | ) | | | (1.5 | ) | | | (1.5 | ) | | | 0.1 | | | | 0.1 | | | | | |
Operating Margin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | | 6.1 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | 6.5 | % | | | 6.6 | % | | | 6.7 | % | | | 6.7 | % | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 5.0 | % | | | 5.6 | % | | | 6.1 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | 6.6 | % | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 4.7 | % | | | 5.4 | % | | | 5.9 | % | | | 6.4 | % | | | 6.7 | % | | | | |
![[Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 57 -
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Projection Comparison — Chemical Specialties($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(FY Ended April 30) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAGR |
| | | 2001A | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | '01 - '06 |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 169.5 | | | $ | 173.9 | | | $ | 179.6 | | | $ | 186.1 | | | $ | 192.7 | | | $ | 199.6 | | | | 3.3 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 166.1 | | | | 166.1 | | | | 171.7 | | | | 177.9 | | | | 185.0 | | | | 1.8 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 161.5 | | | | 166.1 | | | | 171.7 | | | | 177.9 | | | | 185.0 | | | | 1.8 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | | ($7.8 | ) | | | ($13.5 | ) | | | ($14.4 | ) | | | ($14.8 | ) | | | ($14.6 | ) | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (4.6 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 16.6 | | | $ | 18.8 | | | $ | 19.4 | | | $ | 20.1 | | | $ | 20.9 | | | $ | 21.6 | | | | 6.8 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 14.1 | | | | 15.9 | | | | 16.8 | | | | 18.6 | | | | 19.4 | | | | 4.0 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 13.5 | | | | 15.9 | | | | 16.8 | | | | 18.6 | | | | 19.4 | | | | 4.0 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | | ($4.7 | ) | | | ($3.5 | ) | | | ($3.3 | ) | | | ($2.3 | ) | | | ($2.2 | ) | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.6 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Margin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | | 9.8 | % | | | 10.8 | % | | | 10.8 | % | | | 10.8 | % | | | 10.8 | % | | | 10.8 | % | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 8.5 | % | | | 9.6 | % | | | 9.8 | % | | | 10.5 | % | | | 10.5 | % | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 8.4 | % | | | 9.6 | % | | | 9.8 | % | | | 10.5 | % | | | 10.5 | % | | | | |
Note: Operating income excludes unallocated corporate overhead expenses.![[Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 58 -
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Projection Comparison — Plumbing Products Group($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(FY Ended April 30) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAGR |
| | | 2001A | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | '01 - '06 |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 111.4 | | | $ | 116.2 | | | $ | 121.6 | | | $ | 127.6 | | | $ | 133.5 | | | $ | 139.7 | | | | 4.6 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 116.2 | | | | 121.6 | | | | 127.6 | | | | 133.5 | | | | 139.7 | | | | 4.6 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 113.0 | | | | 121.6 | | | | 127.6 | | | | 133.5 | | | | 139.7 | | | | 4.6 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (3.2 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 7.8 | | | $ | 6.9 | | | $ | 8.4 | | | $ | 10.2 | | | $ | 10.6 | | | $ | 11.1 | | | | 9.2 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 6.9 | | | | 8.4 | | | | 10.2 | | | | 10.6 | | | | 11.1 | | | | 9.2 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 6.6 | | | | 8.4 | | | | 10.2 | | | | 10.6 | | | | 11.1 | | | | 9.2 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.3 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Margin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | | 7.0 | % | | | 5.9 | % | | | 6.9 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | 7.9 | % | | | 7.9 | % | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 5.9 | % | | | 6.9 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | 7.9 | % | | | 7.9 | % | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 5.8 | % | | | 6.9 | % | | | 8.0 | % | | | 7.9 | % | | | 7.9 | % | | | | |
Note: Operating income excludes unallocated corporate overhead expenses.![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 59 -
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Projection Comparison — Partsmaster Group($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(FY Ended April 30) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAGR |
| | | 2001A | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | '01 - '06 |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 43.6 | | | $ | 45.2 | | | $ | 47.5 | | | $ | 49.8 | | | $ | 52.2 | | | $ | 54.8 | | | | 4.7 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 44.9 | | | | 46.3 | | | | 47.6 | | | | 49.1 | | | | 50.5 | | | | 3.0 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 43.7 | | | | 46.3 | | | | 47.6 | | | | 49.1 | | | | 50.5 | | | | 3.0 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | | ($0.3 | ) | | | ($1.2 | ) | | | ($2.2 | ) | | | ($3.1 | ) | | | ($4.3 | ) | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (1.2 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 4.9 | | | $ | 6.3 | | | $ | 6.6 | | | $ | 6.9 | | | $ | 7.2 | | | $ | 7.6 | | | | 11.6 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 4.5 | | | | 4.6 | | | | 4.8 | | | | 4.9 | | | | 5.1 | | | | 1.0 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 4.3 | | | | 4.6 | | | | 4.8 | | | | 4.9 | | | | 5.1 | | | | 1.0 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | | ($1.8 | ) | | | ($2.0 | ) | | | ($2.1 | ) | | | ($2.3 | ) | | | ($2.5 | ) | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.2 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Margin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | | 11.2 | % | | | 13.9 | % | | | 13.9 | % | | | 13.9 | % | | | 13.8 | % | | | 13.9 | % | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 10.0 | % | | | 9.9 | % | | | 10.1 | % | | | 10.0 | % | | | 10.1 | % | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 9.8 | % | | | 9.9 | % | | | 10.1 | % | | | 10.0 | % | | | 10.1 | % | | | | |
Note: Operating income excludes unallocated corporate overhead expenses.![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 60 -
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Projection Comparison — Landmark Direct($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(FY Ended April 30) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAGR |
| | | 2001A | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | '01 - '06 |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 41.9 | | | $ | 44.7 | | | $ | 54.2 | | | $ | 58.0 | | | $ | 63.7 | | | $ | 70.0 | | | | 10.8 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 44.4 | | | | 47.3 | | | | 50.6 | | | | 54.2 | | | | 57.9 | | | | 6.7 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 43.2 | | | | 47.3 | | | | 50.6 | | | | 54.2 | | | | 57.9 | | | | 6.7 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | | ($0.3 | ) | | | ($6.9 | ) | | | ($7.4 | ) | | | ($9.5 | ) | | | ($12.1 | ) | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (1.2 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 0.2 | | | $ | 1.8 | | | $ | 3.1 | | | $ | 3.4 | | | $ | 3.7 | | | $ | 4.1 | | | | 112.8 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1.2 | | | | 2.5 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 95.1 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1.2 | | | | 2.5 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 2.9 | | | | 95.1 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | | ($1.8 | ) | | | ($1.9 | ) | | | ($0.9 | ) | | | ($1.0 | ) | | | ($1.2 | ) | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Margin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | | 0.5 | % | | | 4.0 | % | | | 5.7 | % | | | 5.9 | % | | | 5.8 | % | | | 5.9 | % | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | 2.5 | % | | | 4.9 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 0.0 | % | | | 2.5 | % | | | 4.9 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | 5.0 | % | | | | |
Note: Operating income excludes unallocated corporate overhead expenses.![[Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 61 -
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Projection Comparison — Retail Products Group($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(FY Ended April 30) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAGR |
| | | 2001A | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | '01 - '06 |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 26.2 | | | $ | 28.1 | | | $ | 32.3 | | | $ | 37.1 | | | $ | 42.7 | | | $ | 49.1 | | | | 13.4 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 30.0 | | | | 33.0 | | | | 36.3 | | | | 39.9 | | | | 43.9 | | | | 10.9 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 29.2 | | | | 33.0 | | | | 36.3 | | | | 39.9 | | | | 43.9 | | | | 10.9 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | $ | 1.9 | | | $ | 0.7 | | | | ($0.8 | ) | | | ($2.8 | ) | | | ($5.2 | ) | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.8 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 4.1 | | | $ | 3.4 | | | $ | 3.9 | | | $ | 4.5 | | | $ | 5.1 | | | $ | 5.9 | | | | 9.5 | % |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 4.7 | | | | 5.1 | | | | 5.7 | | | | 6.2 | | | | 6.9 | | | | 13.9 | % |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 4.5 | | | | 5.1 | | | | 5.7 | | | | 6.2 | | | | 6.9 | | | | 13.9 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | $ | 1.3 | | | $ | 1.2 | | | $ | 1.2 | | | $ | 1.1 | | | $ | 1.0 | | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.2 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Margin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | | 15.6 | % | | | 12.1 | % | | | 12.1 | % | | | 12.1 | % | | | 11.9 | % | | | 12.0 | % | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 15.7 | % | | | 15.5 | % | | | 15.7 | % | | | 15.5 | % | | | 15.7 | % | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 15.4 | % | | | 15.5 | % | | | 15.7 | % | | | 15.5 | % | | | 15.7 | % | | | | |
Note: Operating income excludes unallocated corporate overhead expenses.![[Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 62-
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Projection Comparison — Western Europe($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(FY Ended February 28) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAGR |
| | | 2001A | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | '01 - '06 |
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 163.9 | | | $ | 148.4 | | | $ | 139.5 | | | $ | 139.5 | | | $ | 132.1 | | | $ | 125.0 | | | | (5.3 | %) |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 148.4 | | | | 139.5 | | | | 139.5 | | | | 143.7 | | | | 148.0 | | | | (2.0 | %) |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 145.1 | | | | 139.5 | | | | 139.5 | | | | 143.7 | | | | 148.0 | | | | (2.0 | %) |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 11.6 | | | $ | 23.0 | | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (3.3 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | $ | 24.0 | | | $ | 20.8 | | | $ | 19.5 | | | $ | 19.5 | | | $ | 18.5 | | | $ | 17.5 | | | | (7.6 | %) |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 19.3 | | | | 19.5 | | | | 19.5 | | | | 20.1 | | | | 20.7 | | | | (3.6 | %) |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 18.6 | | | | 18.1 | | | | 18.1 | | | | 20.1 | | | | 20.7 | | | | (3.6 | %) |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | | | | | ($1.5 | ) | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 1.6 | | | $ | 3.2 | | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.7 | ) | | | (1.4 | ) | | | (1.4 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Margin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| April 2001 | | | 14.6 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | | |
| July 2001 | | | — | | | | 13.0 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | | |
| September 2001 | | | — | | | | 12.8 | % | | | 13.0 | % | | | 13.0 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | 14.0 | % | | | | |
Note: Operating income excludes unallocated corporate overhead expenses.![[Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 63 -
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Projection Comparison — Eastern Europe ($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(FY Ended February 28) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAGR |
| | 2001A | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | '01 - '06 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
April 2001 | | $ | 28.0 | | | $ | 27.3 | | | $ | 28.4 | | | $ | 29.6 | | | $ | 30.6 | | | $ | 31.6 | | | | 2.4 | % |
July 2001 | | | — | | | | 27.3 | | | | 27.6 | | | | 28.4 | | | | 29.3 | | | | 30.1 | | | | 1.5 | % |
September 2001 | | | — | | | | 26.7 | | | | 27.6 | | | | 28.4 | | | | 29.3 | | | | 30.1 | | | | 1.5 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 2001 | | | | | | $ | 0.0 | | | | ($0.8 | ) | | | ($1.2 | ) | | | ($1.3 | ) | | | ($1.5 | ) | | | | |
September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.6 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
April 2001 | | $ | 6.3 | | | $ | 6.3 | | | $ | 5.7 | | | $ | 5.3 | | | $ | 5.5 | | | $ | 5.7 | | | | (2.5 | %) |
July 2001 | | | — | | | | 6.1 | | | | 5.5 | | | | 5.4 | | | | 5.3 | | | | 5.4 | | | | (3.8 | %) |
September 2001 | | | — | | | | 5.9 | | | | 5.5 | | | | 5.4 | | | | 5.3 | | | | 5.4 | | | | (3.8 | %) |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 2001 | | | | | | | ($0.2 | ) | | | ($0.2 | ) | | $ | 0.1 | | | | ($0.2 | ) | | | ($0.3 | ) | | | | |
September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.2 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Margin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
April 2001 | | | 22.5 | % | | | 23.1 | % | | | 20.1 | % | | | 17.9 | % | | | 18.0 | % | | | 18.0 | % | | | | |
July 2001 | | | — | | | | 22.3 | % | | | 19.9 | % | | | 19.0 | % | | | 18.1 | % | | | 17.9 | % | | | | |
September 2001 | | | — | | | | 22.1 | % | | | 19.9 | % | | | 19.0 | % | | | 18.1 | % | | | 17.9 | % | | | | |
| | Note: Operating income excludes unallocated corporate overhead expenses. |
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
-64-
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Projection Comparison — Latin America($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(FY Ended February 28) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAGR |
| | 2001A | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | '01 - '06 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
April 2001 | | $ | 36.2 | | | $ | 36.8 | | | $ | 38.6 | | | $ | 40.5 | | | $ | 42.5 | | | $ | 44.7 | | | | 4.3 | % |
July 2001 | | | — | | | | 37.3 | | | | 38.4 | | | | 39.6 | | | | 40.7 | | | | 42.0 | | | | 3.0 | % |
September 2001 | | | — | | | | 36.5 | | | | 38.4 | | | | 39.6 | | | | 40.7 | | | | 42.0 | | | | 3.0 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 2001 | | | | | | $ | 0.5 | | | | ($0.2 | ) | | | ($0.9 | ) | | | ($1.8 | ) | | | ($2.7 | ) | | | | |
September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.8 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
April 2001 | | $ | 2.7 | | | $ | 2.6 | | | $ | 2.7 | | | $ | 2.8 | | | $ | 3.0 | | | $ | 3.1 | | | | 3.5 | % |
July 2001 | | | — | | | | 2.6 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 3.1 | | | | 3.5 | % |
September 2001 | | | — | | | | 2.5 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 3.1 | | | | 3.5 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 2001 | | | | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | $ | 0.0 | | | | | |
September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.1 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Margin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
April 2001 | | | 7.5 | % | | | 7.1 | % | | | 7.0 | % | | | 6.9 | % | | | 7.1 | % | | | 6.9 | % | | | | |
July 2001 | | | — | | | | 7.0 | % | | | 7.0 | % | | | 7.1 | % | | | 7.4 | % | | | 7.4 | % | | | | |
September 2001 | | | — | | | | 6.8 | % | | | 7.0 | % | | | 7.1 | % | | | 7.4 | % | | | 7.4 | % | | | | |
| | Note: Operating income excludes unallocated corporate overhead expenses. |
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
-65-
DRAFT
Financial Projections
Projection Comparison — Asia ($MM)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(FY Ended February 28) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CAGR |
| | 2001A | | 2002 | | 2003 | | 2004 | | 2005 | | 2006 | | '01 - '06 |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
|
Net Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
April 2001 | | $ | 28.9 | | | $ | 30.1 | | | $ | 31.6 | | | $ | 33.5 | | | $ | 35.2 | | | $ | 36.9 | | | | 5.0 | % |
July 2001 | | | — | | | | 27.5 | | | | 27.5 | | | | 28.3 | | | | 29.1 | | | | 30.0 | | | | 0.7 | % |
September 2001 | | | — | | | | 26.9 | | | | 27.5 | | | | 28.3 | | | | 29.1 | | | | 30.0 | | | | 0.7 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 2001 | | | | | | | ($2.6 | ) | | | ($4.1 | ) | | | ($5.2 | ) | | | ($6.1 | ) | | | ($6.9 | ) | | | | |
September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.6 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
April 2001 | | $ | 3.0 | | | $ | 3.8 | | | $ | 3.6 | | | $ | 3.5 | | | $ | 3.6 | | | $ | 3.8 | | | | 6.1 | % |
July 2001 | | | — | | | | 2.6 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 3.1 | | | | 3.5 | | | | 3.9 | % |
September 2001 | | | — | | | | 2.5 | | | | 2.6 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 3.1 | | | | 3.5 | | | | 3.9 | % |
Change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 2001 | | | | | | | ($1.2 | ) | | | ($1.0 | ) | | | ($0.8 | ) | | | ($0.5 | ) | | | ($0.3 | ) | | | | |
September 2001 | | | | | | | (0.1 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | | |
Operating Margin | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
April 2001 | | | 10.4 | % | | | 12.6 | % | | | 11.4 | % | | | 10.4 | % | | | 10.2 | % | | | 10.3 | % | | | | |
July 2001 | | | — | | | | 9.5 | % | | | 9.5 | % | | | 9.5 | % | | | 10.7 | % | | | 11.7 | % | | | | |
September 2001 | | | — | | | | 9.3 | % | | | 9.5 | % | | | 9.5 | % | | | 10.7 | % | | | 11.7 | % | | | | |
| | Note: Operating income excludes unallocated corporate overhead expenses. |
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
-66-
DRAFT
Stock Price Performance
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
-67-
DRAFT
Stock Price Performance
Indexed Stock Price History(1)
• NCH’s stock has outperformed the S&P 500 in the past year, and was outperforming its peer group before the stock’s sharp decline in June 2001
![[INDEXED STOCK PRICE CHART]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y5685614.gif)
(1) | | Peer group includes: Hawkins, Aceto, JLM Industries, Hughes Supply, Applied Industrial Technologies, Crane Group, Lawson Products, Kaman, Huttig Building Products, Noland, NSI, SCP Pool and Aviall. |
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
-68-
DRAFT
Stock Price Performance
Indexed Stock Price History (Cont’d)(1)
• Over a five-year period, NCH stock has underperformed both its peer group and the S&P 500
![[INDEXED STOCK PRICE CHART]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y5685615.gif)
(1) | | Peer group includes: Hawkins, Aceto, Hughes Supply, Applied Industrial Technologies, Crane Group, Lawson Products, Kaman, Noland, NSI, SCP Pool and Aviall. |
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
-69-
Stock Price Performance
DRAFT
Stock Price and Volume History
![[STOCK PRICE AND VOLUME CHART]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y5685615a.gif)
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
-70-
DRAFT
Stock Price Performance
Stock Price and Volume History (Cont’d)
• | NCH stock traded in the low $70s in late 1997 and early 1998, but has not traded above $56.28 in the past year |
![[STOCK PRICE AND VOLUME HISTORY CHART]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y5685616.gif)
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 71 -
DRAFT
Stock Price Performance
Historical P/E Ratios
| |
• | The Company’s stock traded in a P/E range of 15x – 16x near the end of fiscal year 1998, as compared to a multiple of approximately 11x today |
![[HISTORICAL P/E RATIOS CHART]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y5685617.gif)
(1) | | Peer group includes: Hawkins, Aceto, JLM Industries, Hughes Supply, Applied Industrial Technologies, Lawson Products, Kaman, Noland, NSI, SCP Pool and Aviall. |
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 72 -
DRAFT
Stock Price Performance
Trading Distribution — Last Two Years
• | 80% of trading volume has been at or below the Levy Group’s $47.50 per share bid over the last two years |
![[TRADING DISTRIBUTION CHART]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y5685618.gif)
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 73 -
DRAFT
Stock Price Performance
Trading Distribution – Past Year
• | 70% of trading volume has been at or below the Levy Group’s $47.50 per share bid over the past year |
![[TRADING DISTRIBUTION CHART]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y5685619.gif)
![[DRESDNER KLEINWORT WASSERSTEIN LOGO]](https://capedge.com/proxy/SC TO-TA/0000950123-02-000626/y56856y56856l1.gif)
- 74 -