UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number | 811- 3721 |
| |
| DREYFUS INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND, INC. | |
| (Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter) | |
| | |
| c/o The Dreyfus Corporation 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) | |
| | |
| Janette E. Farragher, Esq. 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 | |
| (Name and address of agent for service) | |
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: | (212) 922-6000 |
| |
Date of fiscal year end: | 5/31 | |
Date of reporting period: | 5/31/12 | |
| | | | | | |
FORM N-CSR
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
|
Dreyfus |
Intermediate Municipal |
Bond Fund, Inc. |
ANNUAL REPORT May 31, 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b435d/b435d68a791a81cbe9ceb80b7697c63998b9fb02" alt=""
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it’s available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It’s simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
|
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value |
| Contents |
| THE FUND |
2 | A Letter from the Chairman and CEO |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance |
6 | Fund Performance |
7 | Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses |
7 | Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses With Those of Other Funds |
8 | Statement of Investments |
34 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities |
35 | Statement of Operations |
36 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
37 | Financial Highlights |
38 | Notes to Financial Statements |
46 | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
47 | Important Tax Information |
48 | Board Members Information |
51 | Officers of the Fund |
| FOR MORE INFORMATION |
| Back Cover |
Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal
Bond Fund, Inc.
The Fund
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afc99/afc991e20e307ff36587cd36ed30e83b0fda3700" alt=""
A LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this annual report for Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc., covering the 12-month period from June 1, 2011, through May 31, 2012. For information about how the fund performed during the reporting period, as well as general market perspectives, we provide a Discussion of Fund Performance on the pages that follow.
Municipal bonds have continued to represent one of the better performing asset classes in U.S. financial markets. Prices have been supported by a number of positive influences, including steady demand for a relatively tight supply of newly issued securities, attractive after-tax current yields compared to government-guaranteed U.S. Treasury securities and improved fiscal conditions for many state and local issuers.
Despite recent weakness in employment data, we believe that U.S. economic trends remain favorable, as evidenced by signs of strength in some of the domestic economy’s more economically sensitive areas. For example, in the automobile industry, new cars offer improved gas mileage, the average age of the auto fleet is old, and credit is widely available at a time when household debt-service ratios have dropped sharply. Even residential construction has moved into a sustainable uptrend, in our opinion, as homebuilders have seen a rise in orders. On the other hand, net exports may prove to be a slight drag on domestic growth since the economy in the United States is stronger than in many of its trading partners. On the whole, we expect near-trend growth in the U.S. economy for the remainder of 2012.
As always, we encourage you to discuss our observations with your financial advisor.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3d2b/c3d2b09c1240a7fbaabf7abcd6497c61e76d04f0" alt=""
Jonathan R. Baum
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Dreyfus Corporation
June 15, 2012
2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e9f2/8e9f29cdee1f139bbacb329fb020c53d4df0d5c0" alt=""
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
For the period of June 1, 2011, through May 31, 2012, as provided by Steven Harvey, Portfolio Manager
Fund and Market Performance Overview
For the 12-month period ended May 31, 2012, Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund achieved a total return of 8.53%.1 The Barclays 7-Year Municipal Bond Index (the “Index”), the fund’s benchmark, achieved a total return of 8.37% for the same period.2
Falling long-term interest rates and favorable supply-and-demand dynamics fueled strong performance among municipal bonds, including intermediate-term securities, over the reporting period. The fund’s return was modestly higher than its benchmark, chiefly due to strength among its lower rated holdings as investors’ appetite for risk expanded.
The Fund’s Investment Approach
The fund seeks the maximum amount of current income exempt from federal income tax as is consistent with the preservation of capital.To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests substantially all of its assets in municipal bonds that provide income exempt from federal personal income tax.
The fund invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds rated A or higher, or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus. The fund may invest up to 20% of its assets in municipal bonds rated below A, including bonds rated below investment grade (“high yield” or “junk” bonds) or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus. The dollar-weighted average maturity of the fund’s portfolio ranges between three and 10 years.
We focus on identifying undervalued sectors and securities, and we minimize the use of interest rate forecasting.We select municipal bonds by using fundamental credit analysis to estimate the relative value and attractiveness of various sectors and securities and to exploit pricing inefficiencies in the municipal bond market.We actively trade among various sectors, such as pre-refunded, general obligation and revenue, based on their apparent relative values.
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
Municipal Bonds Rallied as Economic Concerns Eased
The reporting period began in the midst of deteriorating investor sentiment as investors reacted cautiously to a resurgent European sovereign debt crisis and a contentious political debate regarding U.S. government spending and borrowing.These worries intensified over the summer of 2011, culminating in the unprecedented downgrade of one agency’s credit rating of long-term U.S. government debt. Investors responded by flocking to traditional safe havens, driving longer term interest rates lower.
Better employment data and other positive macroeconomic news cheered investors in the fall, and they responded by reaching for higher levels of income from riskier market sectors and credit rating categories. As a result, lower rated municipal bonds that had been punished during the downturn led the market rebound, while higher quality bonds generally lagged market averages. Although stronger economic growth typically would support higher interest rates, longer term interest rates remained low due to Operation Twist, a stimulative program from the Federal Reserve Board involving massive purchases of U.S.Treasury securities.
Positive supply-and-demand forces also supported municipal bond prices. New issuance volumes fell sharply throughout 2011 after a flood of new supply in late 2010, and political pressure led to reduced borrowing for capital projects over the first five months of 2012. Meanwhile, demand remained robust from individual and institutional investors seeking competitive after-tax yields in a low interest-rate environment.
From a credit quality perspective, the fiscal condition of most states has continued to improve.Tax receipts generally have increased, and many state and local governments have taken steps to rein in spending.
Value-Oriented Approach Buoyed Relative Performance
The search by investors for competitive yields led them to focus on municipal bonds with maturities in the 10- to 15-year range, boosting prices in a segment of the market’s maturity spectrum that we had regarded as undervalued. In addition, we identified a number of opportunities that our credit analysts regarded as underappreciated by
4
most individual investors, leading to successful positions in higher yielding, high-quality securities issued on behalf of airports and other entities that used to carry municipal bond insurance. In addition, the fund achieved positive results from an emphasis on revenue-backed securities and correspondingly underweighted positions in general obligation bonds and escrowed bonds.
Detractors from the fund’s relative performance included a shift in focus toward higher quality bonds when relative valuations changed, but the move may have been too early as the rally among lower rated securities continued.Throughout the reporting period, we maintained the fund’s average duration in a position that we considered in line with market averages.
Prepared for a Changing Market Environment
Municipal bonds ended the reporting period attractively valued compared to U.S.Treasury securities, and most issuers’ fiscal conditions have improved. However, the U.S. economy remains vulnerable to unexpected shocks, and higher yielding and longer maturity bonds have become more richly valued after recent rallies. Consequently, while we have continued to favor revenue-backed municipal bonds over their general obligation counterparts, we expect to adjust the fund’s composition as supply-and-demand dynamics and other market forces evolve.
June 15, 2012
Bond funds are subject generally to interest rate, credit, liquidity and market risks, to varying degrees, all of which are more fully described in the fund’s prospectus. Generally, all other factors being equal, bond prices are inversely related to interest-rate changes, and rate increases can cause price declines.
| |
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid. Past performance is no |
| guarantee of future results. Share price, yield and investment return fluctuate such that upon |
| redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Income may be subject |
| to state and local taxes, and some income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax |
| (AMT) for certain investors. Capital gains, if any, are fully taxable. |
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital |
| gain distributions.The Barclays 7-Year Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged total return |
| performance benchmark for the investment-grade, geographically unrestricted 7-year tax-exempt |
| bond market, consisting of municipal bonds with maturities of 6-8 years. Index returns do not |
| reflect fees and expenses associated with operating a mutual fund. |
FUND PERFORMANCE
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c53/80c53df5139b1596d202767bc02c4bcb2aa273f9" alt=""
| | | | | | |
Average Annual Total Returns as of 5/31/12 | | | |
| 1Year | 5 Years | 10 Years |
Fund | 8.53% | 5.22% | 4.39% |
Barclays 7-Year Municipal Bond Index | 8.37% | 6.71% | 5.44% |
|
† Source: Lipper Inc. |
Past performance is not predictive of future performance.The fund’s performance shown in the graph and table does not |
reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. |
The above graph compares a $10,000 investment made in Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. on |
5/31/02 to a $10,000 investment made in the Barclays 7-Year Municipal Bond Index (the “Index”) on that date.All |
dividends and capital gain distributions are reinvested. |
The fund invests primarily in municipal securities and maintains a portfolio with a weighted average maturity ranging |
between 3 and 10 years.The fund’s performance shown in the line graph above takes into account fees and expenses.The |
Index, unlike the fund, is an unmanaged total return performance benchmark for the investment-grade, geographically |
unrestricted 7-year tax-exempt bond market, consisting of municipal bonds with maturities of 6-8 years.These factors can |
contribute to the Index potentially outperforming or underperforming the fund. Unlike a mutual fund, the Index is not |
subject to charges, fees and other expenses. Investors cannot invest directly in any index. Further information relating to |
fund performance, including expense reimbursements, if applicable, is contained in the Financial Highlights section of the |
prospectus and elsewhere in this report. |
6
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. from December 1, 2011 to May 31, 2012. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment
assuming actual returns for the six months ended May 31, 2012
| | |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 3.89 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,047.50 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended May 31, 2012
| | |
Expenses paid per $1,000† | $ | 3.84 |
Ending value (after expenses) | $ | 1,021.20 |
|
† Expenses are equal to the fund’s annualized expense ratio of .76%, multiplied by the average account value over the |
period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). |
| | | | |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS | | | |
May 31, 2012 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments—99.2% | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Alabama—2.2% | | | | |
Alabama Port Authority, | | | | |
Docks Facilities Revenue | | | | |
(Insured; National Public | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 10/1/22 | 5,000,000 | 5,219,100 |
Alabama Public School and | | | | |
College Authority, Capital | | | | |
Improvement Bonds | 5.00 | 12/1/24 | 2,500,000 | 2,887,375 |
Birmingham Water Works Board, | | | | |
Water Revenue (Insured; | | | | |
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 1/1/17 | 6,310,000 | 7,319,537 |
Jefferson County, | | | | |
Limited Obligation | | | | |
School Warrants | 5.25 | 1/1/17 | 5,050,000 | 5,059,696 |
Alaska—.5% | | | | |
Alaska Industrial Development and | | | | |
Export Authority, Revolving | | | | |
Fund Revenue | 5.25 | 4/1/24 | 3,780,000 | 4,426,607 |
Arizona—4.2% | | | | |
Arizona Transportation Board, | | | | |
Highway Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/21 | 10,990,000 | 12,616,960 |
Arizona Transportation Board, | | | | |
Transportation Excise Tax | | | | |
Revenue (Maricopa County | | | | |
Regional Area Road Fund) | 5.00 | 7/1/17 | 6,000,000 | 7,196,460 |
Arizona Water Infrastructure | | | | |
Finance Authority, Water | | | | |
Quality Revenue | 5.00 | 10/1/19 | 1,965,000 | 2,457,429 |
Phoenix Civic Improvement | | | | |
Corporation, Junior Lien Water | | | | |
System Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/23 | 4,290,000 | 5,260,141 |
Pima County, | | | | |
Sewer System Revenue | | | | |
Obligations (Insured; Assured | | | | |
Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/23 | 3,250,000 | 3,866,135 |
Pima County Industrial Development | | | | |
Authority, Education Revenue | | | | |
(American Charter Schools | | | | |
Foundation Project) | 5.13 | 7/1/15 | 2,680,000 | 2,690,479 |
8
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Arizona (continued) | | | | | |
Salt River Project Agricultural | | | | | |
Improvement and Power | | | | | |
District, Salt River Project | | | | | |
Electric System Revenue | 5.00 | 12/1/27 | 4,500,000 | | 5,419,080 |
California—13.4% | | | | | |
ABAG Finance Authority for | | | | | |
Nonprofit Corporations, | | | | | |
Revenue (San Diego | | | | | |
Hospital Association) | 5.13 | 3/1/18 | 155,000 | | 163,711 |
Arcadia Unified School District, | | | | | |
GO (Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | | |
Municipal Corp.) | 0.00 | 8/1/20 | 1,635,000 | a | 1,204,276 |
Bay Area Toll Authority, | | | | | |
San Francisco Bay Area Toll | | | | | |
Bridge Revenue | 5.25 | 4/1/24 | 6,000,000 | | 7,266,780 |
California, | | | | | |
GO (Various Purpose) | 5.25 | 10/1/20 | 18,060,000 | | 21,757,424 |
California, | | | | | |
GO (Various Purpose) | 5.25 | 3/1/22 | 1,250,000 | | 1,484,863 |
California, | | | | | |
GO (Various Purpose) | 5.63 | 4/1/25 | 3,500,000 | | 4,138,365 |
California Department of Water | | | | | |
Resources, Power Supply Revenue | 5.00 | 5/1/22 | 4,300,000 | | 5,258,427 |
California Department of Water | | | | | |
Resources, Water System | | | | | |
Revenue (Central Valley Project) | 5.00 | 12/1/24 | 2,500,000 | | 2,966,350 |
California Health Facilities | | | | | |
Financing Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (Providence | | | | | |
Health and Services) | 6.25 | 10/1/24 | 3,000,000 | | 3,622,830 |
California Health Facilities | | | | | |
Financing Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Sutter Health) | 5.25 | 8/15/22 | 3,000,000 | | 3,492,750 |
California Housing Finance Agency, | | | | | |
Home Mortgage Revenue | 4.55 | 8/1/21 | 3,810,000 | | 3,841,128 |
California Housing Finance Agency, | | | | | |
Home Mortgage Revenue | 4.60 | 8/1/21 | 2,580,000 | | 2,614,159 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
California (continued) | | | | | |
California Housing Finance Agency, | | | | | |
Home Mortgage Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; FGIC) | 4.40 | 2/1/18 | 3,300,000 | | 3,345,837 |
California Housing Finance Agency, | | | | | |
Home Mortgage Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; FGIC) | 4.40 | 8/1/18 | 3,310,000 | | 3,352,467 |
California State University | | | | | |
Trustees, Systemwide Revenue | 5.00 | 11/1/22 | 5,000,000 | | 6,132,800 |
Clovis Unified School District, | | | | | |
GO (Insured; National Public | | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 0.00 | 8/1/22 | 10,415,000 | a | 7,409,648 |
Coast Community College | | | | | |
District, GO (Insured; | | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | | |
Guarantee Corp.) | 0.00 | 8/1/20 | 1,855,000 | a | 1,428,944 |
Los Angeles Department of | | | | | |
Airports, Subordinate | | | | | |
Revenue (Los Angeles | | | | | |
International Airport) | 5.25 | 5/15/25 | 1,845,000 | | 2,089,942 |
Los Angeles Harbor | | | | | |
Department, Revenue | 5.00 | 8/1/19 | 1,425,000 | | 1,723,993 |
Sacramento City Unified School | | | | | |
District, GO (Insured; Assured | | | | | |
Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 0.00 | 7/1/23 | 5,065,000 | a | 3,337,227 |
San Diego County Water Authority, | | | | | |
Water Revenue | 5.00 | 5/1/21 | 2,725,000 | | 3,402,680 |
San Diego County Water Authority, | | | | | |
Water Revenue | 5.00 | 5/1/28 | 5,000,000 | | 5,869,000 |
San Diego Public Facilities | | | | | |
Financing Authority, | | | | | |
Water Revenue | 5.00 | 8/1/24 | 7,560,000 | | 9,115,999 |
San Francisco City and County | | | | | |
Airport Commission, Second | | | | | |
Series Revenue (San Francisco | | | | | |
International Airport) | 5.00 | 5/1/17 | 5,000,000 | | 5,735,850 |
Southern California Public Power | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue (Canyon | | | | | |
Power Project) | 5.00 | 7/1/23 | 5,000,000 | | 5,990,200 |
Southern California Public Power | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue (Windy | | | | | |
Point/Windy Flats Project) | 5.00 | 7/1/23 | 1,850,000 | | 2,241,553 |
10
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
California (continued) | | | | | |
Tobacco Securitization Authority | | | | | |
of Southern California, Tobacco | | | | | |
Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | | | | | |
(San Diego County Tobacco Asset | | | | | |
Securitization Corporation) | 4.75 | 6/1/25 | 1,860,000 | | 1,828,138 |
Tuolumne Wind Project Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (Tuolumne | | | | | |
Company Project) | 5.00 | 1/1/22 | 2,000,000 | | 2,314,220 |
University of California Regents, | | | | | |
General Revenue | 5.25 | 5/15/23 | 2,500,000 | | 2,952,075 |
Colorado—.9% | | | | | |
Colorado Health Facilities | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue (Catholic | | | | | |
Health Initiatives) | 6.00 | 10/1/23 | 5,355,000 | | 6,390,925 |
E-470 Public Highway Authority, | | | | | |
Senior Revenue (Insured; | | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | | |
Guarantee Corp.) | 0.00 | 9/1/18 | 3,000,000 | a | 2,476,020 |
Connecticut—.2% | | | | | |
Connecticut Health and Educational | | | | | |
Facilities Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Wesleyan University Issue) | 5.00 | 7/1/26 | 1,000,000 | | 1,180,320 |
Connecticut Health and Educational | | | | | |
Facilities Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Wesleyan University Issue) | 5.00 | 7/1/27 | 1,000,000 | | 1,172,340 |
District of Columbia—2.5% | | | | | |
District of Columbia, | | | | | |
HR (Children’s Hospital | | | | | |
Obligated Group Issue) | | | | | |
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | | |
Municipal Corp.) | 5.25 | 7/15/18 | 2,000,000 | | 2,384,820 |
District of Columbia, | | | | | |
Income Tax Secured Revenue | 5.00 | 12/1/25 | 2,500,000 | | 2,994,925 |
District of Columbia, Revenue | | | | | |
(Howard University Issue) | | | | | |
(Insured; AMBAC) | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | 5.00 | 10/1/16 | 2,545,000 | b | 3,028,066 |
District of Columbia, | | | | | |
Revenue (Howard University | | | | | |
Issue) (Insured; AMBAC) | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | 5.00 | 10/1/16 | 2,660,000 | b | 3,164,895 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
District of Columbia (continued) | | | | | |
District of Columbia Water and | | | | | |
Sewer Authority, Public | | | | | |
Utility Subordinate | | | | | |
Lien Revenue | 5.00 | 10/1/27 | 5,980,000 | | 7,175,163 |
Washington Metropolitan Area | | | | | |
Transit Authority, Gross | | | | | |
Revenue Transit Bonds | 5.25 | 7/1/23 | 3,725,000 | | 4,470,410 |
Florida—12.9% | | | | | |
Bay County, | | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; AMBAC) | 5.00 | 9/1/24 | 2,375,000 | | 2,571,104 |
Brevard County, | | | | | |
Local Option Fuel Tax Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; National Public | | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 8/1/23 | 1,260,000 | | 1,313,437 |
Broward County, | | | | | |
Port Facilities Revenue | 5.00 | 9/1/21 | 4,340,000 | | 4,846,044 |
Citizens Property Insurance | | | | | |
Corporation, Coastal Account | | | | | |
Senior Secured Revenue | 5.00 | 6/1/19 | 3,000,000 | | 3,415,680 |
Citizens Property Insurance | | | | | |
Corporation, High-Risk Account | | | | | |
Senior Secured Revenue | 5.25 | 6/1/17 | 7,500,000 | | 8,583,600 |
Collier County, | | | | | |
Gas Tax Revenue (Insured; | | | | | |
AMBAC) (Prerefunded) | 5.25 | 6/1/13 | 2,190,000 | b | 2,298,055 |
Collier County School Board, | | | | | |
COP (Master Lease Program | | | | | |
Agreement) (Insured; Assured | | | | | |
Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.25 | 2/15/20 | 3,500,000 | | 4,207,910 |
Collier County School Board, | | | | | |
COP (Master Lease Program | | | | | |
Agreement) (Insured; Assured | | | | | |
Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.25 | 2/15/22 | 2,000,000 | | 2,425,760 |
Florida Education System, | | | | | |
University of Florida Housing | | | | | |
Revenue (Insured; National | | | | | |
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/22 | 2,055,000 | | 2,295,497 |
Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund | | | | | |
Finance Corporation, Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/16 | 2,250,000 | | 2,560,747 |
12
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Florida (continued) | | | | | |
Florida Municipal Power Agency, | | | | | |
Revenue (Stanton II Project) | | | | | |
(Insured; AMBAC) | 5.50 | 10/1/15 | 3,635,000 | | 3,689,525 |
Florida Water Pollution Control | | | | | |
Financing Corporation, Water PCR | 5.25 | 1/15/21 | 2,545,000 | | 2,724,270 |
Hillsborough County, | | | | | |
GO (Unincorporated Area Parks | | | | | |
and Recreation Program) | | | | | |
(Insured; National Public | | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/22 | 1,155,000 | | 1,474,219 |
Hillsborough County, | | | | | |
Junior Lien Utility Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; AMBAC) | 5.50 | 8/1/14 | 3,205,000 | | 3,543,480 |
Indian River County, | | | | | |
GO (Insured; National Public | | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/20 | 2,265,000 | | 2,586,721 |
Jacksonville, | | | | | |
Guaranteed Entitlement | | | | | |
Improvement Revenue (Insured; | | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | | |
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.38 | 10/1/16 | 3,080,000 | | 3,121,796 |
Jacksonville Aviation Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (Insured; AMBAC) | 5.00 | 10/1/19 | 3,220,000 | | 3,530,505 |
Jacksonville Economic | | | | | |
Development Commission, | | | | | |
Health Care Facilities | | | | | |
Revenue (Florida Proton | | | | | |
Therapy Institute Project) | 6.00 | 9/1/17 | 2,545,000 | c | 2,825,663 |
Lakeland, | | | | | |
Energy System Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | | |
Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 10/1/18 | 6,250,000 | | 7,510,312 |
Martin County, | | | | | |
Utilities System Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; National Public | | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.50 | 10/1/12 | 1,065,000 | | 1,082,306 |
Martin County, | | | | | |
Utilities System Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; National Public | | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.50 | 10/1/13 | 1,485,000 | | 1,575,615 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Florida (continued) | | | | | |
Miami-Dade County, | | | | | |
Aviation Revenue (Miami | | | | | |
International Airport) | 5.50 | 10/1/25 | 2,500,000 | | 2,903,075 |
Miami-Dade County, | | | | | |
Transit System Sales Surtax | | | | | |
Revenue (Insured; XLCA) | 5.00 | 7/1/24 | 2,330,000 | | 2,647,043 |
Miami-Dade County, | | | | | |
Water and Sewer System Revenue | 5.38 | 10/1/24 | 5,000,000 | | 5,805,850 |
Miami-Dade County, | | | | | |
Water and Sewer System Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | | |
Municipal Corp.) | 5.25 | 10/1/17 | 5,000,000 | | 6,001,500 |
Miami-Dade County School Board, | | | | | |
COP (Master Lease Purchase | | | | | |
Agreement) (Insured; FGIC) | 5.25 | 10/1/17 | 5,000,000 | | 5,415,050 |
Miami-Dade County School Board, | | | | | |
COP (Master Lease Purchase | | | | | |
Agreement) (Insured; National | | | | | |
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 8/1/15 | 5,000,000 | | 5,201,850 |
Orlando Utilities Commission, | | | | | |
Utility System Revenue | 5.00 | 10/1/23 | 2,500,000 | | 2,986,950 |
Orlando-Orange County Expressway | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue (Insured; | | | | | |
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/17 | 2,105,000 | | 2,465,965 |
Palm Bay, | | | | | |
Educational Facilities Revenue | | | | | |
(Patriot Charter School Project) | 6.75 | 7/1/22 | 3,000,000 | d | 810,030 |
Palm Beach County School Board, | | | | | |
COP (Master Lease Purchase | | | | | |
Agreement) (Insured; AMBAC) | 5.38 | 8/1/14 | 4,000,000 | | 4,376,200 |
Pasco County, | | | | | |
Solid Waste Disposal and | | | | | |
Resource Recovery | | | | | |
System Revenue | 5.00 | 10/1/16 | 3,000,000 | | 3,343,980 |
Polk County, | | | | | |
Constitutional Fuel Tax | | | | | |
Improvement Revenue (Insured; | | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | | |
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 12/1/19 | 580,000 | | 641,405 |
14
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Florida (continued) | | | | | |
Polk County, | | | | | |
Utility System Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; National Public | | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.25 | 10/1/18 | 2,000,000 | | 2,099,000 |
Sarasota County School Board, | | | | | |
COP (Master Lease Program | | | | | |
Agreement) (Insured; National | | | | | |
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/15 | 1,000,000 | | 1,119,200 |
Seminole County, | | | | | |
Water and Sewer Revenue | 5.00 | 10/1/21 | 1,050,000 | | 1,180,158 |
Tampa, | | | | | |
Solid Waste System Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | | |
Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 10/1/16 | 2,690,000 | | 3,079,512 |
Volusia County School Board, | | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue (Insured; | | | | | |
Assured Guaranty Municipal | | | | | |
Corp.) (Prerefunded) | 5.38 | 10/1/12 | 4,000,000 | b | 4,069,280 |
Georgia—2.6% | | | | | |
Athens Housing Authority, | | | | | |
Student Housing LR (University | | | | | |
of Georgia Real Estate | | | | | |
Foundation East Campus | | | | | |
Housing, LLC Project) (Insured; | | | | | |
AMBAC) (Prerefunded) | 5.25 | 12/1/12 | 2,700,000 | b | 2,767,149 |
Atlanta, | | | | | |
Water and Wastewater Revenue | 6.00 | 11/1/20 | 3,000,000 | | 3,792,540 |
Atlanta, | | | | | |
Water and Wastewater Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | | |
Municipal Corp.) | 5.25 | 11/1/15 | 5,000,000 | | 5,515,350 |
DeKalb County, | | | | | |
Water and Sewerage Revenue | 5.25 | 10/1/25 | 4,000,000 | | 5,103,560 |
Municipal Electric Authority of | | | | | |
Georgia, Revenue (Project One | | | | | |
Subordinated Bonds) | 5.75 | 1/1/19 | 2,660,000 | | 3,263,660 |
Private Colleges and Universities | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Emory University) | 5.00 | 9/1/16 | 3,235,000 | | 3,821,085 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Hawaii—1.1% | | | | |
Hawaii, | | | | |
Airports System Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/18 | 6,000,000 | 6,957,120 |
Honolulu City and County, | | | | |
Wastewater System Revenue | | | | |
(Second Bond Resolution) | 5.00 | 7/1/22 | 2,500,000 | 2,979,350 |
Idaho—.2% | | | | |
Idaho Health Facilities Authority, | | | | |
Revenue (Trinity Health | | | | |
Credit Group) | 6.13 | 12/1/28 | 1,450,000 | 1,719,091 |
Illinois—3.6% | | | | |
Chicago, | | | | |
General Airport Third Lien | | | | |
Revenue (Chicago O’Hare | | | | |
International Airport) | 5.00 | 1/1/17 | 2,500,000 | 2,909,650 |
Chicago, | | | | |
General Airport Third Lien | | | | |
Revenue (Chicago O’Hare | | | | |
International Airport) | | | | |
(Insured; CIFG) | 5.50 | 1/1/15 | 6,450,000 | 6,875,700 |
Chicago, | | | | |
General Airport Third Lien | | | | |
Revenue (Chicago O’Hare | | | | |
International Airport) | | | | |
(Insured; National Public | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.25 | 1/1/17 | 2,000,000 | 2,339,200 |
Chicago, | | | | |
GO (Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | |
Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 1/1/17 | 2,500,000 | 2,733,875 |
Chicago, | | | | |
GO (Insured; National Public | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 1/1/20 | 1,450,000 | 1,643,850 |
Cook County Community | | | | |
High School District | | | | |
Number 219, GO (Insured; | | | | |
Assured Guaranty | | | | |
Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 12/1/24 | 2,020,000 | 2,251,613 |
Greater Chicago Metropolitan | | | | |
Water Reclamation District, | | | | |
GO Capital Improvement | | | | |
Limited Tax Bonds | 5.00 | 12/1/31 | 3,000,000 | 3,518,520 |
16
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Illinois (continued) | | | | | |
Illinois, | | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.00 | 6/15/18 | 1,700,000 | | 2,036,957 |
Illinois Toll Highway Authority, | | | | | |
Toll Highway Senior Revenue | 5.00 | 1/1/25 | 5,000,000 | | 5,675,450 |
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition | | | | | |
Authority, Dedicated State Tax | | | | | |
Revenue (McCormick Place | | | | | |
Expansion Project) (Insured; | | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | | |
Guarantee Corp.) | 0/5.55 | 6/15/21 | 2,500,000 | e | 2,749,350 |
Railsplitter Tobacco Settlement | | | | | |
Authority, Tobacco | | | | | |
Settlement Revenue | 5.00 | 6/1/18 | 1,500,000 | | 1,715,730 |
Indiana—2.0% | | | | | |
Indiana Finance Authority, | | | | | |
Educational Facilities Revenue | | | | | |
(Butler University Project) | 5.00 | 2/1/30 | 1,400,000 | | 1,488,732 |
Indiana Finance Authority, | | | | | |
First Lien Wastewater Utility | | | | | |
Revenue (CWA Authority Project) | 5.25 | 10/1/23 | 2,500,000 | | 3,049,275 |
Indiana Health Facility Financing | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue (Ascension | | | | | |
Health Subordinate Credit Group) | 5.00 | 5/1/13 | 1,000,000 | | 1,042,440 |
Indianapolis, | | | | | |
Gas Utility Distribution | | | | | |
System Second Lien Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | | |
Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 8/15/23 | 3,500,000 | | 4,045,580 |
Indianapolis, | | | | | |
Thermal Energy System First | | | | | |
Lien Revenue (Insured; Assured | | | | | |
Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 10/1/18 | 7,700,000 | | 9,191,336 |
Iowa—.3% | | | | | |
Iowa Finance Authority, | | | | | |
State Revolving Fund Revenue | 5.00 | 8/1/24 | 2,000,000 | | 2,475,640 |
Kansas—1.1% | | | | | |
Wyandotte County/Kansas City | | | | | |
Unified Government, Utility | | | | | |
System Revenue (Insured; AMBAC) | 5.65 | 9/1/18 | 9,130,000 | | 10,432,029 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Kentucky—.5% | | | | |
Kentucky Municipal Power | | | | |
Agency, Power System | | | | |
Revenue (Prairie | | | | |
State Project) (Insured; | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | |
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.25 | 9/1/19 | 2,000,000 | 2,334,080 |
Pikeville, | | | | |
Hospital Improvement | | | | |
Revenue (Pikeville Medical | | | | |
Center, Inc. Project) | 6.25 | 3/1/23 | 2,195,000 | 2,645,897 |
Louisiana—.2% | | | | |
Louisiana State University Board | | | | |
of Supervisors and | | | | |
Agricultural and Mechanical | | | | |
College, Auxiliary Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/25 | 2,000,000 | 2,300,660 |
Maryland—2.2% | | | | |
Maryland, | | | | |
GO (State and Local | | | | |
Facilities Loan) | 5.00 | 8/1/16 | 4,340,000 | 5,131,486 |
Maryland, | | | | |
GO (State and Local | | | | |
Facilities Loan) | 5.00 | 8/1/21 | 2,500,000 | 3,090,675 |
Maryland Department of | | | | |
Transportation, Consolidated | | | | |
Transportation Revenue | 5.00 | 6/1/18 | 4,500,000 | 5,539,500 |
Maryland Economic Development | | | | |
Corporation, EDR | | | | |
(Transportation | | | | |
Facilities Project) | 5.38 | 6/1/25 | 1,500,000 | 1,590,360 |
Maryland Health and Higher | | | | |
Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority, Revenue (The Johns | | | | |
Hopkins Health System | | | | |
Obligated Group Issue) | 5.00 | 7/1/24 | 1,155,000 | 1,396,614 |
Prince George’s County, | | | | |
Consolidated Public | | | | |
Improvement GO | 5.00 | 9/15/22 | 3,340,000 | 4,251,686 |
Massachusetts—2.3% | | | | |
Massachusetts, | | | | |
GO (Consolidated Loan) | 5.00 | 4/1/24 | 7,500,000 | 9,133,575 |
18
| | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Massachusetts (continued) | | | | |
Massachusetts College Building | | | | |
Authority, Revenue | 5.00 | 5/1/27 | 1,800,000 | 2,172,312 |
Massachusetts Development Finance | | | | |
Agency, Revenue (Bentley | | | | |
University Issue) | 5.00 | 7/1/23 | 2,550,000 | 2,873,620 |
Massachusetts Development Finance | | | | |
Agency, Revenue (Partners | | | | |
HealthCare System Issue) | 5.00 | 7/1/25 | 1,000,000 | 1,185,480 |
Massachusetts Development Finance | | | | |
Agency, Revenue (Tufts Medical | | | | |
Center Issue) | 5.50 | 1/1/22 | 2,990,000 | 3,372,062 |
Massachusetts School Building | | | | |
Authority, Senior Dedicated | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.00 | 10/15/23 | 2,500,000 | 3,078,425 |
Michigan—3.1% | | | | |
Detroit, | | | | |
Sewage Disposal System Senior | | | | |
Lien Revenue | 6.50 | 7/1/24 | 4,765,000 | 5,587,915 |
Detroit, | | | | |
Sewage Disposal System Senior | | | | |
Lien Revenue (Insured; Assured | | | | |
Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.25 | 7/1/19 | 1,635,000 | 1,893,559 |
Detroit, | | | | |
Water Supply System Senior | | | | |
Lien Revenue (Insured; | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | |
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/18 | 1,750,000 | 1,891,225 |
Detroit, | | | | |
Water Supply System Senior | | | | |
Lien Revenue (Insured; Assured | | | | |
Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/22 | 5,000,000 | 5,361,600 |
Detroit School District, | | | | |
School Building and Site | | | | |
Improvement Bonds (GO— | | | | |
Unlimited Tax) (Insured; FGIC) | 6.00 | 5/1/19 | 2,965,000 | 3,656,141 |
Michigan, | | | | |
GO (Environmental Program) | 5.00 | 11/1/19 | 2,000,000 | 2,448,060 |
Michigan Building Authority, | | | | |
Revenue (State Police | | | | |
Communications System) | 5.25 | 10/1/13 | 1,945,000 | 2,073,409 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Michigan (continued) | | | | | |
Michigan Strategic Fund, | | | | | |
LOR (State of Michigan | | | | | |
Cadillac Place Office | | | | | |
Building Project) | 5.00 | 10/15/15 | 1,040,000 | | 1,157,790 |
Wayne County Airport Authority, | | | | | |
Airport Revenue (Detroit | | | | | |
Metropolitan Wayne | | | | | |
County Airport) | 5.00 | 12/1/18 | 2,500,000 | | 2,797,525 |
Wayne County Airport Authority, | | | | | |
Junior Lien Airport Revenue | | | | | |
(Detroit Metropolitan Wayne | | | | | |
County Airport) (Insured; | | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | | |
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 12/1/22 | 2,500,000 | | 2,673,625 |
Minnesota—1.5% | | | | | |
Minneapolis-Saint Paul | | | | | |
Metropolitan Airports | | | | | |
Commission, Subordinate | | | | | |
Airport Revenue (Insured; | | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | | |
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 1/1/25 | 5,000,000 | | 5,379,600 |
Minnesota Public Facilities | | | | | |
Authority, Clean Water | | | | | |
Revenue (Prerefunded) | 5.00 | 3/1/17 | 7,500,000 | b | 9,061,050 |
Mississippi—.5% | | | | | |
Mississippi Development Bank, | | | | | |
Special Obligation Revenue | | | | | |
(Madison County Highway | | | | | |
Construction Project) | | | | | |
(Insured; National Public | | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.00 | 1/1/22 | 3,875,000 | | 4,380,920 |
Missouri—.4% | | | | | |
Missouri Development Finance | | | | | |
Board, Infrastructure | | | | | |
Facilities Revenue (Branson | | | | | |
Landing Project) | 6.00 | 6/1/20 | 3,160,000 | | 3,610,679 |
Nebraska—.1% | | | | | |
Nebraska Public Power District, | | | | | |
General Revenue | 5.00 | 1/1/19 | 1,000,000 | | 1,214,070 |
20
| | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Nevada—1.6% | | | | |
Clark County, | | | | |
Airport System Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/22 | 3,300,000 | 3,850,506 |
Clark County School District, | | | | |
Limited Tax GO | 5.00 | 6/15/25 | 4,950,000 | 5,663,988 |
Director of the State of Nevada | | | | |
Department of Business and | | | | |
Industry, SWDR (Republic | | | | |
Services, Inc. Project) | 5.63 | 6/1/18 | 5,000,000 | 5,704,900 |
New Jersey—2.8% | | | | |
Camden County Improvement | | | | |
Authority, Health Care | | | | |
Redevelopment Project Revenue | | | | |
(The Cooper Health System | | | | |
Obligated Group Issue) | 5.25 | 2/15/20 | 3,000,000 | 3,193,410 |
Casino Reinvestment Development | | | | |
Authority, Revenue (Insured; | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | |
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.25 | 6/1/19 | 5,000,000 | 5,333,500 |
New Jersey Economic Development | | | | |
Authority, Cigarette Tax Revenue | 5.38 | 6/15/15 | 3,300,000 | 3,781,140 |
New Jersey Economic Development | | | | |
Authority, Cigarette | | | | |
Tax Revenue | 5.50 | 6/15/16 | 1,000,000 | 1,192,890 |
New Jersey Economic Development | | | | |
Authority, School Facilities | | | | |
Construction Revenue (Insured; | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | |
Guarantee Corporation) | 5.00 | 9/1/18 | 5,500,000 | 6,156,260 |
New Jersey Health Care Facilities | | | | |
Financing Authority, Revenue | | | | |
(South Jersey Hospital Issue) | 6.00 | 7/1/12 | 775,000 | 776,790 |
New Jersey Higher Education | | | | |
Student Assistance Authority, | | | | |
Student Loan Revenue (Insured; | | | | |
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.88 | 6/1/21 | 2,530,000 | 2,849,893 |
New Jersey Transportation Trust | | | | |
Fund Authority (Transportation | | | | |
System) (Insured; National | | | | |
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.25 | 12/15/18 | 2,930,000 | 3,301,905 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
New Mexico—1.1% | | | | | |
Jicarilla, | | | | | |
Apache Nation Revenue | 5.00 | 9/1/13 | 1,840,000 | | 1,887,932 |
New Mexico Hospital Equipment | | | | | |
Loan Council, Hospital System | | | | | |
Revenue (Presbyterian | | | | | |
Healthcare Services) | 6.00 | 8/1/23 | 7,500,000 | | 8,734,800 |
New York—6.9% | | | | | |
Long Island Power Authority, | | | | | |
Electric System General | | | | | |
Revenue (Insured; National | | | | | |
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 3.73 | 9/1/15 | 3,000,000 | f | 3,069,930 |
New York City, | | | | | |
GO | 5.00 | 8/1/17 | 2,000,000 | | 2,386,580 |
New York City, | | | | | |
GO | 5.00 | 8/1/18 | 5,000,000 | | 5,753,150 |
New York City, | | | | | |
GO | 5.00 | 4/1/20 | 2,500,000 | | 2,783,475 |
New York City, | | | | | |
GO | 5.00 | 8/1/20 | 2,655,000 | | 3,273,456 |
New York City, | | | | | |
GO | 5.00 | 4/1/22 | 4,810,000 | | 5,355,406 |
New York City, | | | | | |
GO | 5.00 | 8/1/28 | 5,000,000 | | 5,867,900 |
New York City Health and | | | | | |
Hospitals Corporation, | | | | | |
Health System Revenue | 5.00 | 2/15/22 | 4,385,000 | | 5,138,475 |
New York City Transitional | | | | | |
Finance Authority, | | | | | |
Future Tax Secured | | | | | |
Subordinate Revenue | 5.00 | 2/1/24 | 3,000,000 | | 3,625,470 |
New York Local Government | | | | | |
Assistance Corporation, GO | 5.25 | 4/1/16 | 3,425,000 | | 3,890,389 |
New York State Dormitory | | | | | |
Authority, Mortgage Hospital | | | | | |
Revenue (The Long Island | | | | | |
College Hospital) | | | | | |
(Collateralized; FHA) | 6.00 | 8/15/15 | 1,515,000 | | 1,528,332 |
New York State Dormitory | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(New York University | | | | | |
Hospitals Center) | 5.25 | 7/1/24 | 700,000 | | 761,327 |
22
| | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
New York (continued) | | | | |
New York State Dormitory | | | | |
Authority, State Personal | | | | |
Income Tax Revenue | | | | |
(General Purpose) | 5.25 | 2/15/21 | 2,500,000 | 3,085,100 |
New York State Thruway Authority, | | | | |
Second General Highway and | | | | |
Bridge Trust Fund Bonds | | | | |
(Insured; AMBAC) | 5.00 | 4/1/18 | 5,000,000 | 5,686,700 |
New York State Urban Development | | | | |
Corporation, Corporate Purpose | | | | |
Subordinate Lien | 5.13 | 7/1/19 | 2,000,000 | 2,147,700 |
New York State Urban Development | | | | |
Corporation, State Personal | | | | |
Income Tax Revenue | | | | |
(General Purpose) | 5.00 | 3/15/27 | 2,500,000 | 2,961,075 |
Niagara County Industrial | | | | |
Development Agency, Solid | | | | |
Waste Disposal Facility | | | | |
Revenue (American Ref-Fuel | | | | |
Company of Niagara, L.P. Facility) | 5.45 | 11/15/12 | 2,000,000 | 2,025,520 |
Suffolk Tobacco Asset | | | | |
Securitization Corporation, Tobacco | | | | |
Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds | 5.38 | 6/1/28 | 2,815,000 | 2,434,862 |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel | | | | |
Authority, General Revenue | | | | |
(MTA Bridges and Tunnels) | 5.00 | 1/1/19 | 2,500,000 | 3,063,225 |
North Carolina—2.6% | | | | |
North Carolina, | | | | |
Capital Improvement Limited | | | | |
Obligation Bonds | 5.00 | 5/1/30 | 4,000,000 | 4,674,560 |
North Carolina Eastern Municipal | | | | |
Power Agency, Power | | | | |
System Revenue | 5.13 | 1/1/14 | 3,000,000 | 3,078,120 |
North Carolina Eastern Municipal | | | | |
Power Agency, Power | | | | |
System Revenue | 5.00 | 1/1/21 | 1,200,000 | 1,528,740 |
North Carolina Medical Care | | | | |
Commission, Retirement | | | | |
Facilities First Mortgage | | | | |
Revenue (The United Methodist | | | | |
Retirement Homes Project) | 4.75 | 10/1/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,014,920 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
North Carolina (continued) | | | | | |
North Carolina Medical Care | | | | | |
Commission, Retirement | | | | | |
Facilities First Mortgage | | | | | |
Revenue (The United Methodist | | | | | |
Retirement Homes Project) | 5.13 | 10/1/19 | 1,250,000 | | 1,290,250 |
North Carolina Municipal Power | | | | | |
Agency Number 1, Catawba | | | | | |
Electric Revenue (Insured; | | | | | |
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.25 | 1/1/16 | 2,540,000 | | 2,611,933 |
North Carolina Municipal Power | | | | | |
Agency Number 1, Catawba | | | | | |
Electric Revenue (Insured; | | | | | |
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.25 | 1/1/17 | 10,000,000 | | 10,280,800 |
Ohio—3.0% | | | | | |
Cuyahoga County, | | | | | |
Revenue (Cleveland Clinic | | | | | |
Health System Obligated Group) | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | 6.00 | 7/1/13 | 2,530,000 | b | 2,686,860 |
Cuyahoga County, | | | | | |
Revenue (Cleveland Clinic | | | | | |
Health System Obligated Group) | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | 6.00 | 7/1/13 | 2,470,000 | b | 2,623,140 |
Knox County, | | | | | |
Hospital Facilities Revenue | | | | | |
(Knox Community Hospital) | | | | | |
(Insured; Radian) | 5.00 | 6/1/12 | 405,000 | | 405,000 |
Montgomery County, | | | | | |
Revenue (Miami Valley Hospital) | 5.75 | 11/15/22 | 2,970,000 | | 3,653,456 |
Ohio Higher Educational Facility | | | | | |
Commission, Higher Educational | | | | | |
Facility Revenue (Xavier | | | | | |
University Project) (Insured; | | | | | |
CIFG) (Prerefunded) | 5.25 | 5/1/16 | 3,230,000 | b | 3,806,684 |
Ohio Water Development Authority, | | | | | |
PCR (Buckeye Power, Inc. | | | | | |
Project) (Insured; AMBAC) | 5.00 | 5/1/22 | 4,030,000 | | 4,302,186 |
Ohio Water Development Authority, | | | | | |
Water Pollution Control Loan | | | | | |
Fund Revenue (Water | | | | | |
Quality Series) | 5.00 | 12/1/23 | 3,000,000 | | 3,594,360 |
24
| | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Ohio (continued) | | | | |
Ross County, | | | | |
Hospital Facilities Revenue | | | | |
(Adena Health System) | 5.75 | 12/1/22 | 3,835,000 | 4,400,931 |
University of Cincinnati, | | | | |
General Receipts Bonds | | | | |
(Insured; AMBAC) | 5.00 | 6/1/17 | 2,500,000 | 2,788,375 |
Pennsylvania—3.5% | | | | |
Allegheny County Airport | | | | |
Authority, Airport Revenue | | | | |
(Pittsburgh International | | | | |
Airport) (Insured; FGIC) | 5.00 | 1/1/19 | 3,395,000 | 3,746,586 |
Chester County Industrial | | | | |
Development Authority, | | | | |
Revenue (Avon Grove Charter | | | | |
School Project) | 5.65 | 12/15/17 | 695,000 | 728,652 |
Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge | | | | |
Commission, Bridge Revenue | 5.25 | 7/1/13 | 2,500,000 | 2,622,950 |
Delaware Valley Regional | | | | |
Finance Authority, Local | | | | |
Government Revenue | 5.75 | 7/1/17 | 6,830,000 | 7,990,280 |
Erie Higher Education Building | | | | |
Authority, College Revenue | | | | |
(Mercyhurst College Project) | 5.13 | 3/15/23 | 2,045,000 | 2,254,428 |
Montgomery County Higher Education | | | | |
and Health Authority, HR | | | | |
(Abington Memorial Hospital) | | | | |
(Insured; AMBAC) | 6.10 | 6/1/12 | 1,750,000 | 1,750,000 |
Pennsylvania Intergovernmental | | | | |
Cooperation Authority, Special | | | | |
Tax Revenue (City of | | | | |
Philadelphia Funding Program) | 5.00 | 6/15/17 | 4,000,000 | 4,792,160 |
Philadelphia, | | | | |
GO (Insured; XLCA) | 5.25 | 2/15/13 | 5,535,000 | 5,694,297 |
Philadelphia Authority for | | | | |
Industrial Development, | | | | |
Revenue (Independence | | | | |
Charter School Project) | 5.38 | 9/15/17 | 2,000,000 | 2,097,720 |
Philadelphia School District, | | | | |
GO | 5.00 | 9/1/17 | 1,160,000 | 1,334,580 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
South Carolina—2.9% | | | | |
Berkeley County School District, | | | | |
Installment Purchase Revenue | | | | |
(Securing Assets for Education) | 5.25 | 12/1/21 | 9,395,000 | 9,854,228 |
Charleston Educational Excellence | | | | |
Financing Corporation, | | | | |
Installment Purchase Revenue | | | | |
(Charleston County School | | | | |
District, South Carolina Project) | 5.25 | 12/1/21 | 4,500,000 | 5,043,510 |
Hilton Head Island Public | | | | |
Facilities Corporation, COP | | | | |
(Insured; AMBAC) | 5.00 | 3/1/13 | 1,065,000 | 1,098,249 |
Piedmont Municipal Power Agency, | | | | |
Electric Revenue | 5.00 | 1/1/20 | 5,000,000 | 5,940,150 |
South Carolina Public Service | | | | |
Authority, Revenue Obligations | | | | |
(Santee Cooper) | 5.00 | 12/1/21 | 3,600,000 | 4,488,912 |
Tobacco Settlement Revenue | | | | |
Management Authority, Tobacco | | | | |
Settlement Asset-Backed | | | | |
Refunding Bonds | 5.00 | 6/1/18 | 1,300,000 | 1,300,000 |
Texas—6.4% | | | | |
Austin, | | | | |
Electric Utility System Revenue | 5.00 | 11/15/23 | 1,550,000 | 1,832,658 |
Dallas Independent School | | | | |
District, Unlimited Tax Bonds | | | | |
(Permament School Fund | | | | |
Guarantee Program) | 5.00 | 2/15/23 | 1,295,000 | 1,587,139 |
Dallas-Fort Worth International | | | | |
Airport Facility Improvement | | | | |
Corporation, Revenue | | | | |
(Learjet Inc. Project) | 6.15 | 1/1/16 | 4,000,000 | 4,006,400 |
Fort Bend Independent School | | | | |
District, Unlimited Tax School | | | | |
Building Bonds (Permanent | | | | |
School Fund Guarantee Program) | 5.00 | 8/15/23 | 7,105,000 | 8,629,520 |
Gulf Coast Waste Disposal | | | | |
Authority, Bayport Area System | | | | |
Revenue (Insured; AMBAC) | 5.00 | 10/1/14 | 2,065,000 | 2,216,757 |
26
| | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Texas (continued) | | | | |
Harris County Metropolitan Transit | | | | |
Authority, Sales and Use | | | | |
Tax Revenue | 5.00 | 11/1/27 | 2,500,000 | 2,960,850 |
Houston, | | | | |
Combined Utility System First | | | | |
Lien Revenue | 5.00 | 11/15/20 | 2,725,000 | 3,404,642 |
Houston, | | | | |
Combined Utility System First | | | | |
Lien Revenue | 5.00 | 11/15/29 | 2,500,000 | 2,939,325 |
Lewisville Independent School | | | | |
District, Unlimited Tax School | | | | |
Building Bonds (Permament | | | | |
School Fund Guarantee Program) | 5.00 | 8/15/22 | 7,825,000 | 9,621,698 |
North Texas Tollway Authority, | | | | |
First Tier System Revenue | 6.00 | 1/1/23 | 3,000,000 | 3,563,730 |
San Antonio, | | | | |
Electric and Gas Systems Revenue | 5.00 | 2/1/23 | 5,000,000 | 5,677,150 |
San Antonio, | | | | |
Water System Revenue | 5.00 | 5/15/29 | 1,355,000 | 1,583,629 |
Tarrant County Health Facilities | | | | |
Development Corporation, | | | | |
Health Resources System | | | | |
Revenue (Insured; National | | | | |
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.75 | 2/15/14 | 5,000,000 | 5,462,750 |
Texas Water Development Board, | | | | |
State Revolving Fund | | | | |
Subordinate Lien Revenue | 5.00 | 7/15/23 | 2,000,000 | 2,425,680 |
University of Houston System | | | | |
Board of Regents, | | | | |
Consolidated Revenue | 5.00 | 2/15/18 | 2,500,000 | 3,026,175 |
University of Texas System Board | | | | |
of Regents, Financing System | | | | |
Revenue | 5.00 | 8/15/20 | 1,000,000 | 1,261,510 |
Utah—.3% | | | | |
Utah Building Ownership Authority, | | | | |
LR (State Facilities Master | | | | |
Lease Program) | 5.00 | 5/15/17 | 1,825,000 | 1,967,606 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Utah (continued) | | | | | |
Utah Building Ownership Authority, | | | | | |
LR (State Facilities Master | | | | | |
Lease Program) (Prerefunded) | 5.00 | 5/15/14 | 1,125,000 | b | 1,227,206 |
Virginia—.9% | | | | | |
Tobacco Settlement Financing | | | | | |
Corporation of Virginia, | | | | | |
Tobacco Settlement | | | | | |
Asset-Backed Bonds | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | 5.25 | 6/1/12 | 425,000 | b | 425,000 |
Virginia, | | | | | |
GO | 4.00 | 6/1/15 | 4,000,000 | | 4,424,560 |
Virginia College Building | | | | | |
Authority, Educational | | | | | |
Facilities Revenue (21st | | | | | |
Century College and | | | | | |
Equipment Programs) | 5.00 | 2/1/22 | 3,000,000 | | 3,725,220 |
Washington—5.1% | | | | | |
Energy Northwest, | | | | | |
Columbia Generating Station | | | | | |
Electric Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/21 | 5,000,000 | | 5,770,450 |
Energy Northwest, | | | | | |
Columbia Generating Station | | | | | |
Electric Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/23 | 5,000,000 | | 5,714,450 |
Franklin County, | | | | | |
GO (Pasco School District | | | | | |
Number 1) (Insured; Assured | | | | | |
Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | | | | | |
(Prerefunded) | 5.25 | 6/1/13 | 5,000,000 | b | 5,251,700 |
Goat Hill Properties, | | | | | |
LR (Government Office Building | | | | | |
Project) (Insured; National | | | | | |
Public Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.25 | 12/1/20 | 2,360,000 | | 2,553,166 |
Port of Seattle, | | | | | |
Intermediate Lien Revenue | 5.00 | 2/1/18 | 2,500,000 | | 2,914,125 |
Port of Seattle, | | | | | |
Intermediate Lien Revenue | 5.00 | 8/1/28 | 2,485,000 | | 2,904,567 |
Port of Seattle, | | | | | |
Limited Tax GO | 5.75 | 12/1/25 | 1,000,000 | | 1,230,130 |
28
| | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Washington (continued) | | | | |
Port of Seattle, | | | | |
Limited Tax GO (Insured; | | | | |
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 11/1/16 | 5,000,000 | 5,303,100 |
Port of Tacoma, | | | | |
Limited Tax GO (Insured; | | | | |
Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 12/1/20 | 3,025,000 | 3,563,208 |
Washington, | | | | |
GO | 5.75 | 10/1/12 | 465,000 | 473,668 |
Washington, | | | | |
GO | 5.75 | 10/1/12 | 5,000 | 5,093 |
Washington, | | | | |
GO (Various Purpose) | 5.00 | 7/1/16 | 5,000,000 | 5,873,900 |
Washington, | | | | |
GO (Various Purpose) | 5.00 | 2/1/22 | 2,500,000 | 3,025,825 |
Washington, | | | | |
GO (Various Purpose) | | | | |
(Insured; AMBAC) | 5.00 | 1/1/19 | 3,600,000 | 4,098,096 |
West Virginia—.2% | | | | |
West Virginia University Board of | | | | |
Governors, University | | | | |
Improvement Revenue (West | | | | |
Virginia University Projects) | 5.00 | 10/1/22 | 1,475,000 | 1,810,533 |
Wisconsin—.3% | | | | |
Wisconsin Public Power Inc., | | | | |
Power Supply System Revenue | | | | |
(Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | |
Municipal Corp.) | 5.00 | 7/1/19 | 2,950,000 | 3,244,912 |
U.S. Related—3.1% | | | | |
Puerto Rico Commonwealth, | | | | |
Public Improvement GO | 5.25 | 7/1/23 | 1,500,000 | 1,619,475 |
Puerto Rico Electric Power | | | | |
Authority, Power Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/22 | 2,500,000 | 2,763,825 |
Puerto Rico Highways and | | | | |
Transportation Authority, | | | | |
Highway Revenue (Insured; | | | | |
National Public Finance | | | | |
Guarantee Corp.) | 5.50 | 7/1/13 | 1,630,000 | 1,672,364 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | | | |
Long-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
U.S. Related (continued) | | | | | |
Puerto Rico Highways and | | | | | |
Transportation Authority, | | | | | |
Transportation Revenue | 5.50 | 7/1/24 | 1,750,000 | | 1,955,870 |
Puerto Rico Highways and | | | | | |
Transportation Authority, | | | | | |
Transportation Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; National Public | | | | | |
Finance Guarantee Corp.) | 5.25 | 7/1/12 | 2,440,000 | | 2,449,418 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure | | | | | |
Financing Authority, Special | | | | | |
Tax Revenue | 5.00 | 7/1/16 | 510,000 | | 556,910 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure | | | | | |
Financing Authority, Special | | | | | |
Tax Revenue (Insured; AMBAC) | 5.50 | 7/1/18 | 3,000,000 | | 3,396,300 |
Puerto Rico Infrastructure | | | | | |
Financing Authority, Special | | | | | |
Tax Revenue (Insured; AMBAC) | 5.50 | 7/1/23 | 2,670,000 | | 3,033,334 |
Puerto Rico Public Buildings | | | | | |
Authority, Government | | | | | |
Facilities Revenue | | | | | |
(Insured; XLCA) | 5.25 | 7/1/20 | 2,000,000 | | 2,221,460 |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing | | | | | |
Corporation, Sales Tax Revenue | | | | | |
(First Subordinate Series) | 5.50 | 8/1/21 | 8,000,000 | | 9,533,680 |
Total Long-Term Municipal Investments | | | | |
(cost $870,045,424) | | | | | 938,296,012 |
|
Short-Term Municipal | | | | | |
Investments—.7% | | | | | |
New York; | | | | | |
New York City, | | | | | |
GO Notes (LOC; JPMorgan | | | | | |
Chase Bank) | 0.19 | 6/1/12 | 2,900,000 | g | 2,900,000 |
30
| | | | | | |
Short-Term Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Investments (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
New York (continued); | | | | | |
New York City, | | | | | |
GO Notes (LOC; JPMorgan | | | | | |
Chase Bank) | 0.19 | 6/1/12 | 1,100,000 g | | 1,100,000 |
New York City, | | | | | |
GO Notes (LOC; JPMorgan | | | | | |
Chase Bank) | 0.19 | 6/1/12 | 2,300,000 g | | 2,300,000 |
Total Short-Term Municipal Investments | | | | |
(cost $6,300,000) | | | | | 6,300,000 |
|
Total Investments (cost $876,345,424) | | | 99.9% | | 944,596,012 |
Cash and Receivables (Net) | | | .1% | | 933,211 |
Net Assets | | | 100.0% | | 945,529,223 |
|
a Security issued with a zero coupon. Income is recognized through the accretion of discount. |
b These securities are prerefunded; the date shown represents the prerefunded date. Bonds which are prerefunded are |
collateralized by U.S. Government securities which are held in escrow and are used to pay principal and interest on |
the municipal issue and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date. |
c Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.This security may be resold |
in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.At May 31, 2012, this security |
was valued at $2,825,663 or 0.3% of net assets. |
d Non-income producing—security in default. |
e Zero coupon until a specified date at which time the stated coupon rate becomes effective until maturity. |
f Variable rate security—interest rate subject to periodic change. |
g Variable rate demand note—rate shown is the interest rate in effect at May 31, 2012. Maturity date represents the |
next demand date, or the ultimate maturity date if earlier. |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (continued)
| | | |
Summary of Abbreviations | | |
|
ABAG | Association of Bay Area | ACA | American Capital Access |
| Governments | | |
AGC | ACE Guaranty Corporation | AGIC | Asset Guaranty Insurance Company |
AMBAC | American Municipal Bond | ARRN | Adjustable Rate |
| Assurance Corporation | | Receipt Notes |
BAN | Bond Anticipation Notes | BPA | Bond Purchase Agreement |
CIFG | CDC Ixis Financial Guaranty | COP | Certificate of Participation |
CP | Commercial Paper | DRIVERS | Derivative Inverse |
| | | Tax-Exempt Receipts |
EDR | Economic Development | EIR | Environmental Improvement |
| Revenue | | Revenue |
FGIC | Financial Guaranty | FHA | Federal Housing |
| Insurance Company | | Administration |
FHLB | Federal Home | FHLMC | Federal Home Loan Mortgage |
| Loan Bank | | Corporation |
FNMA | Federal National | GAN | Grant Anticipation Notes |
| Mortgage Association | | |
GIC | Guaranteed Investment | GNMA | Government National Mortgage |
| Contract | | Association |
GO | General Obligation | HR | Hospital Revenue |
IDB | Industrial Development Board | IDC | Industrial Development Corporation |
IDR | Industrial Development | LIFERS | Long Inverse Floating |
| Revenue | | Exempt Receipts |
LOC | Letter of Credit | LOR | Limited Obligation Revenue |
LR | Lease Revenue | MERLOTS | Municipal Exempt Receipt |
| | | Liquidity Option Tender |
MFHR | Multi-Family Housing Revenue | MFMR | Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue |
PCR | Pollution Control Revenue | PILOT | Payment in Lieu of Taxes |
P-FLOATS | Puttable Floating Option | PUTTERS | Puttable Tax-Exempt Receipts |
| Tax-Exempt Receipts | | |
RAC | Revenue Anticipation Certificates | RAN | Revenue Anticipation Notes |
RAW | Revenue Anticipation Warrants | ROCS | Reset Options Certificates |
RRR | Resources Recovery Revenue | SAAN | State Aid Anticipation Notes |
SBPA | Standby Bond Purchase Agreement | SFHR | Single Family Housing Revenue |
SFMR | Single Family Mortgage Revenue | SONYMA | State of New York Mortgage Agency |
SPEARS | Short Puttable Exempt | SWDR | Solid Waste Disposal Revenue |
| Adjustable Receipts | | |
TAN | Tax Anticipation Notes | TAW | Tax Anticipation Warrants |
TRAN | Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes | XLCA | XL Capital Assurance |
32
| | | | | |
Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited) | |
|
Fitch | or | Moody’s | or | Standard & Poor’s | Value (%)† |
AAA | | Aaa | | AAA | 14.4 |
AA | | Aa | | AA | 52.1 |
A | | A | | A | 23.0 |
BBB | | Baa | | BBB | 8.6 |
BB | | Ba | | BB | .5 |
B | | B | | B | .5 |
F1 | | MIG1/P1 | | SP1/A1 | .1 |
Not Ratedh | | Not Ratedh | | Not Ratedh | .8 |
| | | | | 100.0 |
|
† Based on total investments. |
h Securities which, while not rated by Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, have been determined by the Manager to |
be of comparable quality to those rated securities in which the fund may invest. |
See notes to financial statements.
|
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES |
May 31, 2012 |
| | |
| Cost | Value |
Assets ($): | | |
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments | 876,345,424 | 944,596,012 |
Cash | | 40,615 |
Interest receivable | | 13,032,403 |
Receivable for investment securities sold | | 5,127,062 |
Receivable for shares of Common Stock subscribed | | 282,059 |
Prepaid expenses | | 193,064 |
| | 963,271,215 |
Liabilities ($): | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(b) | | 561,712 |
Payable for investment securities purchased | | 16,685,153 |
Payable for shares of Common Stock redeemed | | 397,392 |
Accrued expenses | | 97,735 |
| | 17,741,992 |
Net Assets ($) | | 945,529,223 |
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | |
Paid-in capital | | 875,752,654 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | | 1,525,981 |
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | | |
(depreciation) on investments | | 68,250,588 |
Net Assets ($) | | 945,529,223 |
Shares Outstanding | | |
(300 million shares of $.001 par value Common Stock authorized) | | 66,465,429 |
Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($) | | 14.23 |
See notes to financial statements. | | |
34
|
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS |
Year Ended May 31, 2012 |
| | |
Investment Income ($): | |
Interest Income | 35,219,998 |
Expenses: | |
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 5,367,703 |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(b) | 1,033,628 |
Directors’ fees and expenses—Note 3(c) | 125,598 |
Professional fees | 86,154 |
Custodian fees—Note 3(b) | 69,500 |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 35,302 |
Registration fees | 34,093 |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 8,805 |
Interest expense—Note 2 | 39 |
Miscellaneous | 68,541 |
Total Expenses | 6,829,363 |
Less—reduction in fees due to earnings credits—Note 3(b) | (640) |
Net Expenses | 6,828,723 |
Investment Income—Net | 28,391,275 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 5,863,434 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments | 38,399,083 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 44,262,517 |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 72,653,792 |
|
See notes to financial statements. | |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | | | |
| | Year Ended May 31, |
| 2012 | 2011 |
Operations ($): | | |
Investment income—net | 28,391,275 | 30,635,816 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 5,863,434 | 4,221,440 |
Net unrealized appreciation | | |
(depreciation) on investments | 38,399,083 | (5,269,250) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
Resulting from Operations | 72,653,792 | 29,588,006 |
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | |
Investment income—net | (28,111,406) | (30,552,597) |
Capital Stock Transactions ($): | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold | 109,950,878 | 101,505,301 |
Dividends reinvested | 21,440,491 | 23,223,511 |
Cost of shares redeemed | (88,556,558) | (128,054,855) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
from Capital Stock Transactions | 42,834,811 | (3,326,043) |
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 87,377,197 | (4,290,634) |
Net Assets ($): | | |
Beginning of Period | 858,152,026 | 862,442,660 |
End of Period | 945,529,223 | 858,152,026 |
Capital Share Transactions (Shares): | | |
Shares sold | 7,867,352 | 7,509,367 |
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 1,540,058 | 1,726,097 |
Shares redeemed | (6,370,958) | (9,586,589) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 3,036,452 | (351,125) |
|
See notes to financial statements. | | |
36
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following table describes the performance for the fiscal periods indicated. Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund’s financial statements.
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended May 31, | |
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 |
Per Share Data ($): | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | 13.53 | 13.52 | 13.06 | 13.12 | 13.21 |
Investment Operations: | | | | | |
Investment income—neta | .44 | .48 | .49 | .51 | .50 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | .70 | .00b | .45 | (.07) | (.09) |
Total from Investment Operations | 1.14 | .48 | .94 | .44 | .41 |
Distributions: | | | | | |
Dividends from investment income—net | (.44) | (.47) | (.48) | (.50) | (.50) |
Net asset value, end of period | 14.23 | 13.53 | 13.52 | 13.06 | 13.12 |
Total Return (%) | 8.53 | 3.65 | 7.42 | 3.44 | 3.16 |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | | | | | |
Ratio of total expenses | | | | | |
to average net assets | .76 | .75 | .75 | .78 | .81 |
Ratio of net expenses | | | | | |
to average net assets | .76 | .75 | .75 | .77 | .79 |
Ratio of interest and expense related | | | | | |
to floating rates notes issued | | | | | |
to average net asstes | — | — | — | .02 | .05 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | |
to average net assets | 3.17 | 3.53 | 3.68 | 3.94 | 3.81 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 15.11 | 21.46 | 13.22 | 22.75 | 28.89 |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 945,529 | 858,152 | 862,443 | 785,392 | 831,359 |
| |
a | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. |
b | Amount represents less than $.01 per share. |
See notes to financial statements.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. (the “fund”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”), as a diversified open-end management investment company. The fund’s investment objective is to seek the maximum amount of current income exempt from federal income tax as is consistent with the preservation of capital.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”) serves as the fund’s investment adviser. MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund’s shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions.Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e. the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value.This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
38
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. Valuation techniques used to value the fund’s investments are as follows:
Investments in securities are valued each business day by an independent pricing service (the “Service”) approved by the Board of Directors. Investments for which quoted bid prices are readily available and are representative of the bid side of the market in the judgment of the Service are valued at the mean between the quoted bid prices (as obtained by the Service from dealers in such securities) and asked prices (as calculated by the Service based upon its evaluation of the market for such securities). Other investments (which constitute a majority of the portfolio securities) are carried at fair value as determined by the Service, based on methods which include consideration of: yields or prices of municipal securities of comparable quality, coupon, maturity
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
and type; indications as to values from dealers; and general market conditions. All of the preceding securities are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Service’s procedures are reviewed by Dreyfus under the general supervision of the Board of Directors.
When market quotations or official closing prices are not readily available, or are determined not to reflect accurately fair value, such as when the value of a security has been significantly affected by events after the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded, but before the fund calculates its net asset value, the fund may value these investments at fair value as determined in accordance with the procedures approved by the Board of Directors. Certain factors may be considered when fair valuing investments such as: fundamental analytical data, the nature and duration of restrictions on disposition, an evaluation of the forces that influence the market in which the securities are purchased and sold, and public trading in similar securities of the issuer or comparable issuers. These securities are either categorized as Level 2 or 3 depending on the relevant inputs used.
For restricted securities where observable inputs are limited, assumptions about market activity and risk are used and are categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of May 31, 2012 in valuing the fund’s investments:
| | | | |
| | Level 2—Other | Level 3— | |
| Level 1— | Significant | Significant | |
| Unadjusted | Observable | Unobservable | |
| Quoted Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total |
Assets ($) | | | | |
Investments in Securities: | | | |
Municipal Bonds | — | 943,785,982 | 810,030 | 944,596,012 |
40
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
| | |
| Municipal Bonds ($) |
Balance as of 5/31/2011 | — |
Realized gain (loss) | — |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | (89,970) |
Purchases | — |
Sales | — |
Transfers into Level 3† | 900,000 |
Transfers out of Level 3 | — |
Balance as of 5/31/2012 | 810,030 |
The amount of total gains (losses) for the | |
period included in earnings attributable | |
to the change in unrealized gains (losses) | |
relating to investments still held at 5/31/2012 | (684,810) |
| |
† | Transfers into Level 3 represents the value at the date of transfer.The transfer into Level 3 for the |
| current period was due to the lack of observable inputs following the issuer’s default. |
In May 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04 “Amendments to Achieve Common FairValue Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”)” (“ASU 2011-04”). ASU 2011-04 includes common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to disclose the following information for fair value measurements categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy: quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, the valuation processes used by the reporting entity and a narrative description of the sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those unobservable inputs. In addition, ASU 2011-04 will require reporting entities to make disclosures about amounts and reasons for all transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
measurements.The new and revised disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. At this time, management is evaluating the implications of ASU 2011-04 and its impact on the financial statements.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Securities purchased or sold on a when issued or delayed delivery basis may be settled a month or more after the trade date.
(c) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gains. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP.
(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, which can distribute tax exempt dividends, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code, and to make distributions of income and net realized capital gain sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended May 31, 2012, the fund did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions.The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
42
Each of the tax years in the four-year period ended May 31, 2012 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
At May 31, 2012, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows: undistributed tax exempt income $530,254, undistributed ordinary income $232,958, undistributed capital gains $466,414 and unrealized appreciation $69,077,197.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal periods ended May 31, 2012 and May 31, 2011 were as follows: tax exempt income $28,111,406 and $30,552,249 and ordinary income $0 and $348, respectively.
During the period ended May 31, 2012, as a result of permanent book to tax differences, primarily due to the tax treatment for amortization adjustments, the fund decreased accumulated undistributed investment income-net by $279,869, increased accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments by $233,648 and increased paid in capital by $46,221. Net assets and net asset value per share were not affected by this reclassification.
NOTE 2—Bank Lines of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $225 million unsecured credit facility led by Citibank, N.A. and a $300 million unsecured credit facility provided by The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus (each, a “Facility”), each to be utilized primarily for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay its pro rata portion of commitment fees for each Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on rates determined pursuant to the terms of the respective Facility at the time of borrowing.
The average amount of borrowings outstanding under the Facilities during the period ended May 31, 2012, was approximately $3,300 with a related weighted average annualized interest rate of 1.16%.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .60% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
(b) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, the fund reimburses the Distributor an amount not to exceed an annual rate of .25% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets for certain allocated expenses of providing personal services and/or maintaining shareholder accounts.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquires regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. During the period ended May 31, 2012, the fund was charged $572,932, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency and cash management services for the fund. During the period ended May 31, 2012, the fund was charged $224,603 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.
The fund compensatesThe Bank of NewYork Mellon under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for the fund. During the period ended May 31, 2012, the fund was charged $69,500 pursuant to the custody agreement.
The fund has arrangements with the transfer agent and the custodian whereby the fund may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset transfer agency and custody fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
44
Prior to May 29, 2012, the fund compensated The Bank of NewYork Mellon under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. During the period ended May 31, 2012, the fund was charged $23,559 pursuant to the cash management agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statement of Operations.These fees were partially offset by earnings credits of $640.
During the period ended May 31, 2012, the fund was charged $6,565 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer and his staff.
The components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $479,142, custodian fees $18,418, chief compliance officer fees $2,652 and transfer agency per account fees $61,500.
(c) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended May 31, 2012, amounted to $186,625,372 and $133,158,621, respectively.
At May 31, 2012, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $875,518,815; accordingly, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $69,077,197, consisting of $71,599,149 gross unrealized appreciation and $2,521,952 gross unrealized depreciation.
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED |
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
Shareholders and Board of Directors
Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc., including the statement of investments, as of May 31, 2012, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of May 31, 2012 by correspondence with the custodian and others.We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dreyfus Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. at May 31, 2012, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46d7e/46d7e79739967f680cafe407f93fb954cdcedbee" alt=""
New York, New York
July 27, 2012
46
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
In accordance with federal tax law, the fund hereby reports all the dividends paid from investment income-net during its fiscal year ended May 31, 2012 as “exempt-interest dividends” (not subject to regular federal income tax).
Where required by federal tax law rules, shareholders will receive notification of their portion of the fund’s taxable ordinary dividends (if any), capital gains distributions (if any) and tax-exempt dividends paid for the 2012 calendar year on Form 1099-DIV which will be mailed in early 2013.
BOARD MEMBERS INFORMATION (Unaudited)
|
Joseph S. DiMartino (68) |
Chairman of the Board (1995) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5Years: |
• Corporate Director and Trustee |
Other Public Company Board Memberships During Past 5Years: |
• CBIZ (formerly, Century Business Services, Inc.), a provider of outsourcing functions for small |
and medium size companies, Director (1997-present) |
• Sunair Services Corporation, a provider of certain outdoor-related services to homes and |
businesses, Director (2005-2009) |
• The Newark Group, a provider of a national market of paper recovery facilities, paperboard |
mills and paperboard converting plants, Director (2000-2010) |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 157 |
——————— |
William Hodding Carter III (77) |
Board Member (1988) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5Years: |
• Professor of Leadership & Public Policy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (2006-present) |
• President and Chief Executive Officer of the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation (1998-2006) |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 27 |
——————— |
Gordon J. Davis (70) |
Board Member (2006) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5Years: |
• Partner in the law firm of Venable, LLP |
• Partner in the law firm of Dewey & LeBoeuf, LLP (1994-2012) |
Other Public Company Board Memberships During Past 5Years: |
• Consolidated Edison, Inc., a utility company, Director (1997-present) |
• The Phoenix Companies, Inc., a life insurance company, Director (2000-present) |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 40 |
48
|
Joni Evans (70) |
Board Member (2006) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5Years: |
• Chief Executive Officer, www.wowOwow.com an online community dedicated to women’s |
conversations and publications (2007-present) |
• Principal, Joni Evans Ltd. (publishing) (2006-present) |
• Senior Vice President of the William Morris Agency (1994-2006) |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 27 |
——————— |
Ehud Houminer (71) |
Board Member (1994) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5Years: |
• Executive-in-Residence at the Columbia Business School, Columbia University (1992-present) |
Other Public Company Board Memberships During Past 5Years: |
• Avnet Inc., an electronics distributor, Director (1993-present) |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 60 |
——————— |
Richard C. Leone (72) |
Board Member (1980) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5Years: |
• Senior Fellow of The Century Foundation (formerly,The Twentieth Century Fund, Inc.), a tax |
exempt research foundation engaged in the study of economic, foreign policy and domestic issues |
Other Public Company Board Memberships During Past 5Years: |
• Partnership for a Secure America, Director |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 27 |
——————— |
Hans C. Mautner (74) |
Board Member (1980) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5Years: |
• President—International Division and an Advisory Director of Simon Property Group, a real |
estate investment company (1998-2010) |
• Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Simon Global Limited (1999-2010) |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 27 |
BOARD MEMBERS INFORMATION (Unaudited) (continued)
|
Robin A. Melvin (48) |
Board Member (1995) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5Years: |
• Director, Boisi Family Foundation, a private family foundation that supports youth-serving orga- |
nizations that promote the self sufficiency of youth from disadvantaged circumstances (1995-2012) |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 50 |
——————— |
Burton N.Wallack (61) |
Board Member (2006) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5Years: |
• President and Co-owner of Wallack Management Company, a real estate management company |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 27 |
——————— |
John E. Zuccotti (74) |
Board Member (1980) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5Years: |
• Chairman of Brookfield Properties, Inc. |
• Senior Counsel of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP |
• Emeritus Chairman of the Real Estate Board of New York |
Other Public Company Board Memberships During Past 5Years: |
• Emigrant Savings Bank, Director (2004-present) |
• Doris Duke Charitable Foundation,Trustee (2006-present) |
• New York Private Bank & Trust, Director |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 27 |
——————— |
Once elected all Board Members serve for an indefinite term, but achieve Emeritus status upon reaching age 80.The address of the Board Members and Officers is c/o The Dreyfus Corporation, 200 Park Avenue, NewYork, NewYork 10166.Additional information about the Board Members is available in the fund’s Statement of Additional Information which can be obtained from Dreyfus free of charge by calling this toll free number: 1-800-DREYFUS.
David W. Burke, Emeritus Board Member
Arnold S. Hiatt, Emeritus Board Member
50
OFFICERS OF THE FUND (Unaudited)
BRADLEY J. SKAPYAK, President since January 2010.
Chief Operating Officer and a director of the Manager since June 2009; from April 2003 to June 2009, Mr. Skapyak was the head of the Investment Accounting and Support Department of the Manager. He is an officer of 72 investment companies (comprised of 156 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 53 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 1988.
JANETTE E. FARRAGHER, Vice President and Secretary since December 2011.
Assistant General Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 49 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 1984.
KIESHA ASTWOOD, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since January 2010.
Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 39 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since July 1995.
JAMES BITETTO, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Senior Counsel of BNY Mellon and Secretary of the Manager, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 45 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since December 1996.
JONI LACKS CHARATAN, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Senior Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 56 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1988.
JOSEPH M. CHIOFFI, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Senior Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 50 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since June 2000.
KATHLEEN DENICHOLAS, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since January 2010.
Managing Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 37 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 2001.
JOHN B. HAMMALIAN, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Senior Managing Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 48 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 1991.
M. CRISTINA MEISER, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since January 2010.
Senior Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 42 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since August 2001.
ROBERT R. MULLERY, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Managing Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 60 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since May 1986.
OFFICERS OF THE FUND (Unaudited) (continued)
JEFF PRUSNOFSKY, Vice President and Assistant Secretary since August 2005.
Senior Managing Counsel of BNY Mellon, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 47 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1990.
JAMES WINDELS, Treasurer since November 2001.
Director – Mutual Fund Accounting of the Manager, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 53 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since April 1985.
RICHARD CASSARO, Assistant Treasurer since January 2008.
Senior Accounting Manager – Money Market and Municipal Bond Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 53 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since September 1982.
GAVIN C. REILLY, Assistant Treasurer since December 2005.
Tax Manager of the Investment Accounting and Support Department of the Manager, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 43 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since April 1991.
ROBERT S. ROBOL, Assistant Treasurer since August 2003.
Senior Accounting Manager – Fixed Income Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 48 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1988.
ROBERT SALVIOLO, Assistant Treasurer since July 2007.
Senior Accounting Manager – Equity Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 45 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since June 1989.
ROBERT SVAGNA, Assistant Treasurer since August 2005.
Senior Accounting Manager – Equity Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 73 investment companies (comprised of 183 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 45 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since November 1990.
JOSEPH W. CONNOLLY, Chief Compliance Officer since October 2004.
Chief Compliance Officer of the Manager and The Dreyfus Family of Funds (73 investment companies, comprised of 183 portfolios).
He is 55 years old and has served in various capacities with the Manager since 1980, including manager of the firm’s Fund Accounting Department from 1997 through October 2001.
MATTHEW D. CONNOLLY, Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer since April 2012.
Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of the Distributor since October 2011; from March 2010 to September 2011, Global Head, KYC Reviews and Director, UBS Investment Bank; until March 2010,AML Compliance Officer and Senior Vice President, Citi Global Wealth Management. He is an officer of 69 investment companies (comprised of 179 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 39 years old and has been an employee of the Distributor since October 2011.
52
For More Information
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da95d/da95db245f774eef7f9abb85f794fc8af800fdab" alt=""
Ticker Symbol: DITEX
Telephone 1-800-DREYFUS
Mail The Dreyfus Family of Funds, 144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144 E-mail Send your request to info@dreyfus.com Internet Information can be viewed online or downloaded at: http://www.dreyfus.com
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund's Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov and without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-DREYFUS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79daf/79dafeaf78834ea4fccc94d36f376a1af12d35bb" alt=""
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. There have been no amendments to, or waivers in connection with, the Code of Ethics during the period covered by this Report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Registrant's Board has determined that Ehud Houminer, a member of the Audit Committee of the Board, is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Mr. Houminer is "independent" as defined by the SEC for purposes of audit committee financial expert determinations.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years (the "Reporting Periods") for professional services rendered by the Registrant's principal accountant (the "Auditor") for the audit of the Registrant's annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $ 30,312 in 2011 and $31,401 in 2012.
(b) Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant's financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item 4 were $6,000 in 2011 and $12,000 in 2012. These services consisted of one or more of the following: (i) agreed upon procedures related to compliance with Internal Revenue Code section 817(h), (ii) security counts required by Rule 17f-2 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (iii) advisory services as to the accounting or disclosure treatment of Registrant transactions or events and (iv) advisory services to the accounting or disclosure treatment of the actual or potential impact to the Registrant of final or proposed rules, standards or interpretations by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Accounting Standards Boards or other regulatory or standard-setting bodies.
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for non-audit assurance and related services by the Auditor to the Registrant's investment adviser (not including any sub-investment adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant ("Service Affiliates"), that were reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit of the Service Affiliate, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2011 and $0 in 2012.
(c) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning ("Tax Services") were $3,948 in 2011 and $3,370 in 2012. These services consisted of: (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments; (iii) tax advice regarding tax qualification matters and/or treatment of various financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Tax Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $0 in 2011 and $0 in 2012.
(d) All Other Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item, were $550 in 2011 and $1,129 in 2012. These services consisted of a review of the Registrant's anti-money laundering program.
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Non-Audit Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates, other than the services reported in paragraphs (b) through (c) of this Item, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee, were $0 in 2011 and $0 in 2012.
(e)(1) Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Registrant's Audit Committee has established policies and procedures (the "Policy") for pre-approval (within specified fee limits) of the Auditor's engagements for non-audit services to the Registrant and Service Affiliates without specific case-by-case consideration. The pre-approved services in the Policy can include pre-approved audit services, pre-approved audit-related services, pre-approved tax services and pre-approved all other services. Pre-approval considerations include whether the proposed services are compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence. Pre-approvals pursuant to the Policy are considered annually.
(e)(2) Note: None of the services described in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this Item 4 were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) None of the hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal account's full-time, permanent employees.
Non-Audit Fees. The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to the Registrant, and rendered to Service Affiliates, for the Reporting Periods were $19,526,919 in 2011 and $34,285,599 in 2012.
Auditor Independence. The Registrant's Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates, which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval), is compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable. [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY]
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable. [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY]
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable. [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY, beginning with reports for periods ended on and after December 31, 2005]
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable. [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY]
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures applicable to Item 10.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Code of ethics referred to in Item 2.
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DREYFUS INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL BOND FUND, INC.
By: /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak |
Bradley J. Skapyak, President |
Date: | July 24, 2012 |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
|
By: /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak |
Bradley J. Skapyak, President |
Date: | July 24, 2012 |
|
By: /s/ James Windels |
James Windels, Treasurer |
Date: | July 24, 2012 |
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
(a)(1) Code of ethics referred to in Item 2.
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT)
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT)