[logo - American Funds®]
The right choice for the long term®
The New Economy Fund
A wide lens: A look at where the fund invests
[photo of a pasture from a distance - scattered clouds in the sky]
Annual report for the year ended November 30, 2007
The New Economy Fund® seeks to help you participate in the many investment opportunities created as society continues to shift from producing industrial goods to providing a wide array of information and services. The fund has the flexibility to invest all over the world in industries ranging from broadcasting and publishing to banking and insurance, cellular telephones to merchandising, and health care to computer software and the Internet.
This fund is one of the 30 American Funds. American Funds is one of the nation’s largest mutual fund families. For 75 years, Capital Research and Management Company,SM the American Funds adviser, has invested with a long-term focus based on thorough research and attention to risk.
Contents | |
| |
Letter to shareholders | 1 |
The value of a long-term perspective | 4 |
Feature article | |
A wide lens: A look at where the fund invests | 6 |
Summary investment portfolio | 12 |
Financial statements | 17 |
Board of trustees and other officers | 31 |
What makes American Funds different? | back cover |
Fund results shown in this report, unless otherwise indicated, are for Class A shares at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 5.75%) had been deducted, the results would have been lower. Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. Investing for short periods makes losses more likely. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Here are the average annual total returns on a $1,000 investment with all distributions reinvested for periods ended December 31, 2007 (the most recent calendar quarter-end): |
| | | | | | | | | |
Class A shares | | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting 5.75% maximum sales charge | | | 4.98 | % | | | 16.07 | % | | | 7.34 | % |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio for Class A shares as of the most recent fiscal year-end was 0.80%. This figure does not reflect a fee waiver currently in effect; therefore, the actual expense ratio is lower.
The fund’s investment adviser waived 5% of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005, and increased the waiver to 10% on April 1, 2005. Fund results shown reflect actual expenses, with the waiver applied. Fund results would have been lower without the waiver. Please see the Financial Highlights table on pages 24 and 25 for details.
Results for other share classes can be found on page 3.
Investing outside the United States may be subject to additional risks, such as currency fluctuations and political instability, which are detailed in the fund’s prospectus. Global diversification can help reduce these risks. Investing in small-capitalization stocks can involve additional risks, as more fully described in the fund’s prospectus.
Fellow shareholders:
[photo of a pasture from a distance - scattered clouds in the sky]
The New Economy Fund posted strong results for the fiscal year. The fund produced a 14.8% return for the 12 months ended November 30, 2007, including reinvested dividends paid in December 2006 of 19 cents per share.
The New Economy Fund’s results surpassed the 6.4% return of the Global Service and Information Index, which tracks companies in those sectors around the world. The index is unmanaged and its results do not reflect expenses. The fund’s results were also better than the 12.9% return of its peer group, the Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds Index, which measures 30 growth funds representing a variety of market capitalizations. The fund handily beat the unmanaged Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index, a broad measure of the U.S. stock market, which recorded a 7.7% return for the fiscal period.
In fact, over the long term, the fund’s results were better than these indexes’ returns. For the five years ended November 30, 2007, as shown in the table below, The New Economy Fund returned an average annual total return of 15.4%, while the Global Service and Information Index and Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds Index both returned 13.4% and the S&P 500 returned 11.6%. For the 10-year period, The New Economy Fund’s average annual total return was 8.6%, compared to the Global Service and Information Index average annual return of 6.2%, the Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds Index average annual return of 5.6% and the S&P 500’s 6.2%.
The market environment
Equity markets in the United States and around the world did well over the period despite a few sharp market downturns during the year. In February, growing concerns about a slowing U.S. economy and worries over a possible bubble in the Chinese financial markets sent markets tumbling. In the summer, the subprime mortgage crisis triggered a second, more pronounced correction when sharply rising loan defaults caused a severe correction in the availability of consumer and commercial credit, and investors worried about how widely the damage would spread. Although the markets later rebounded — even exceeding their earlier levels — these credit issues continue to play out, with liquidity conditions deteriorating in most parts of the world.
Despite the credit crunch, the U.S. economy continued to grow during the fund’s fiscal year based on strong corporate profits and solid corporate balance sheets. The economy was also helped by the Federal Reserve’s cutting of key interest rates in August, September, October and December — the first rate cuts since the Fed started on an upward rate cycle in June 2004. European equity markets moved higher as their economies benefited from strong growth in exports and manufacturing, while low unemployment led to high consumer confidence. Asian equity markets including South Korea, Hong Kong and Taiwan posted significant gains.
[Begin Sidebar]
Results at a glance (for periods ended November 30, 2007, with all distributions reinvested) | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total returns | | | Average annual total returns | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Lifetime | |
| | | | | | | | | | | (since | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | | | 12/1/83) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
The New Economy Fund (Class A shares) | | | 14.8 | % | | | 15.4 | % | | | 8.6 | % | | | 12.6 | % |
Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds Index | | | 12.9 | | | | 13.4 | | | | 5.6 | | | | 10.8 | |
Global Service and Information Index*† | | | 6.4 | | | | 13.4 | | | | 6.2 | | | N/A | |
Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index* | | | 7.7 | | | | 11.6 | | | | 6.2 | | | | 12.3 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
*Unmanaged. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
†The index is compiled by Capital Research and Management Company, the investment adviser to the fund. | | | | | | | | | | |
[End Sidebar]
How the fund responded
Considering the strength of overseas equity markets during the period, it came as no surprise that 20 of the fund’s top 25 investments with the biggest gains were based outside the United States, and more than half of those were based in emerging markets. Two of the fund’s largest holdings, both India-based commercial banks, ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank, were up 52.5% and 72.7%, respectively. Sberbank, a Russian commercial bank, rose 83.1%, and Brazil’s Unibanco increased 76.8%. Other significant holdings outside the U.S. that fared well during the year include German health care conglomerate Bayer, up 60.3%, and Delta Electronics (Thailand), up 17.6%.
The financial sector, while strong outside the United States, did not fare well domestically. The banking subsector represents the second-largest group in the fund (11.2% of the fund’s assets), and so the U.S. weakness hurt the fund’s results. Freddie Mac, the U.S.-government sponsored mortgage company, suffered from the concerns about subprime mortgage loans; its stock dropped 47.8%. Also hurt by the credit turmoil was multinational bank Citigroup, a smaller holding, which lost 32.9%. Wells Fargo, a U.S.-based commercial bank, fell 8.0%; French bank Société Générale dropped 7.6% of its value.
The fund’s holdings in software and services made meaningful contributions to returns for the period. U.S. Internet giant Google, which is the top holding at 2.6% of the fund, returned a significant 42.9%. Tencent Holdings, a Chinese Internet and mobile telephone services provider, gained the most of any stock in the fund, returning 171.1%. However, not all such stocks did so well; Internet services provider Yahoo!, the fifth-largest holding, hovered about flat for the year, dropping 0.7%. Software makers contributed: Microsoft (the third-largest holding) rose 14.6%, and Oracle and Novell also gained.
The continued weakening of the U.S. dollar acted as a tailwind for the fund, which held 37% of net assets in companies domiciled outside the United States. Generally, when the dollar weakens, U.S.-based investors in companies abroad benefit from currency translation, as investments in euros, yen and other currencies become worth more when converted into U.S. dollars.
Looking forward
The equities markets around the world have been strong for five years running, supported by a booming global economy. However, in the United States, sharply declining housing prices, deteriorating consumer confidence, soaring oil prices and the unfurling credit crisis are impacting prospects for financial markets here and abroad. So, we are cautious about the global landscape, and we remain careful and prudent while we watch to see how events unfold.
When building the fund’s portfolio, the investment professionals do the fundamental research necessary to evaluate each individual company’s merits, regardless of the ups and downs of the markets. In doing so, we continue to find exciting companies in the services and information areas. To learn more about these industries, please read the feature article, “A wide lens: A look at where the fund invests,” beginning on page 6.
We thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely,
/s/ Gordon Crawford
Gordon Crawford
Vice Chairman of the Board
/s/ Timothy D. Armour
Timothy D. Armour
President
January 9, 2008
For current information about the fund, visit americanfunds.com.
[Begin Sidebar]
Where the fund’s assets are invested (percent of net assets)
[begin pie chart]
As of November 30, 2007 | | | |
| | | |
United States | | | 50.9 | % |
Europe | | | 17.4 | |
Asia & Pacific Basin | | | 16.5 | |
Other (including | | | | |
Latin America) | | | 3.2 | |
Short-term securities & | | | | |
other assets less liabilities | | | 12.0 | |
[end pie chart]
[begin pie chart]
As of November 30, 2006 | | | | |
| | | | |
United States | | | 56.0 | % |
Europe | | | 20.5 | |
Asia & Pacific Basin | | | 16.7 | |
Other (including | | | | |
Latin America) | | | 1.9 | |
Short-term securities & | | | | |
other assets less liabilities | | | 4.9 | |
[end pie chart]
[End Sidebar]
Other share class results
unaudited
Class B, Class C, Class F and Class 529
Fund results shown are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Average annual total returns for periods ended December 31, 2007 (the most recent calendar quarter-end): | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | Life of class | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Class B shares— first sold 3/15/00 | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting applicable contingent deferred sales charge | | | | | | | | | |
(CDSC), maximum of 5%, payable only if shares are | | | | | | | | | |
sold within six years of purchase | | | 5.56 | % | | | 16.34 | % | | | 0.36 | % |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | 10.56 | | | | 16.56 | | | | 0.36 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C shares— first sold 3/15/01 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting CDSC, maximum of 1%, payable only if | | | | | | | | | | | | |
shares are sold within one year of purchase | | | 9.49 | | | | 16.51 | | | | 5.44 | |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | 10.49 | | | | 16.51 | | | | 5.44 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class F shares*— first sold 3/15/01 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | | | | | | | | | | | | |
by sponsoring firm | | | 11.41 | | | | 17.44 | | | | 6.30 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-A shares†— first sold 2/15/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting 5.75% maximum sales charge | | | 4.95 | | | | 16.05 | | | | 9.03 | |
Not reflecting maximum sales charge | | | 11.34 | | | | 17.44 | | | | 10.14 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-B shares†— first sold 2/19/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting applicable CDSC, maximum of 5%, payable | | | | | | | | | | | | |
only if shares are sold within six years of purchase | | | 5.44 | | | | 16.18 | | | | 9.50 | |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | 10.44 | | | | 16.40 | | | | 9.60 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-C shares†— first sold 2/21/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting CDSC, maximum of 1%, payable only if | | | | | | | | | | | | |
shares are sold within one year of purchase | | | 9.40 | | | | 16.39 | | | | 9.86 | |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | 10.40 | | | | 16.39 | | | | 9.86 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-E shares*†— first sold 3/15/02 | | | 10.98 | | | | 17.01 | | | | 8.71 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-F shares*†— first sold 10/11/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | | | | | | | | | | | | |
by sponsoring firm | | | 11.54 | | | | 17.46 | | | | 18.83 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
*These shares are sold without any initial or contingent deferred sales charge. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
†Results shown do not reflect the $10 initial account setup fee and an annual $10 account maintenance fee. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The fund’s investment adviser waived 5% of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005, and increased the waiver to 10% on April 1, 2005. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. Please see the Financial Highlights table on pages 24 and 25 for details that include expense ratios for all share classes.
For information regarding the differences among the various share classes, please refer to the fund’s prospectus.
The value of a long-term perspective
Fund results shown are for Class A shares and reflect deduction of the maximum sales charge of 5.75% on the $10,000 investment.1 Thus, the net amount invested was $9,425.2 Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Here’s how a $10,000 investment in The New Economy Fund’s Class A shares grew between December 1, 1983 — when the fund began operations — and November 30, 2007, the end of its latest fiscal year. As you can see, the $10,000 would have increased to $161,965 after deducting the maximum 5.75% sales charge and reinvesting all distributions, an average annual increase of 12.3%. The fund’s year-by-year results appear under the chart.
Average annual total returns based on a $1,000 investment (for periods ended November 30, 2007)* | |
| | | | | | | |
Class A shares: | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | |
| | | | | | | |
| +8.16 | % | | | +14.08 | % | | | +7.91 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | |
*Assumes reinvestment of all distributions and payment of the maximum 5.75% sales charge. | |
The fund’s investment adviser waived 5% of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through March 31, 2005, and increased the waiver to 10% on April 1, 2005. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. Please see the Financial Highlights table on pages 24 and 25 for details. | |
[begin mountain chart]
| | New Economy Fund1,3 | | | S&P 500 with dividends reinvested3,4 | | | Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds Index3,5 | | | Consumer Price Index (inflation)6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12/1/1983 | | $ | 9,425 | | | $ | 10,000 | | | $ | 10,000 | | | $ | 10,000 | |
11/30/1984 | | | 9,478 | | | | 10,295 | | | | 9,117 | | | | 10,405 | |
11/30/1985 | | | 13,135 | | | | 13,276 | | | | 11,474 | | | | 10,771 | |
11/30/1986 | | | 15,939 | | | | 16,949 | | | | 14,182 | | | | 10,909 | |
11/30/1987 | | | 15,082 | | | | 16,154 | | | | 13,143 | | | | 11,403 | |
11/30/1988 | | | 18,449 | | | | 19,915 | | | | 15,718 | | | | 11,887 | |
11/30/1989 | | | 25,252 | | | | 26,047 | | | | 21,465 | | | | 12,441 | |
11/30/1990 | | | 21,871 | | | | 25,143 | | | | 19,635 | | | | 13,221 | |
11/30/1991 | | | 26,395 | | | | 30,246 | | | | 25,951 | | | | 13,617 | |
11/30/1992 | | | 32,619 | | | | 35,823 | | | | 30,838 | | | | 14,032 | |
11/30/1993 | | | 42,601 | | | | 39,433 | | | | 34,947 | | | | 14,407 | |
11/30/1994 | | | 41,348 | | | | 39,845 | | | | 34,809 | | | | 14,792 | |
11/30/1995 | | | 50,949 | | | | 54,560 | | | | 47,089 | | | | 15,178 | |
11/30/1996 | | | 58,591 | | | | 69,753 | | | | 56,344 | | | | 15,672 | |
11/30/1997 | | | 71,268 | | | | 89,635 | | | | 67,444 | | | | 15,958 | |
11/30/1998 | | | 88,183 | | | | 110,844 | | | | 76,462 | | | | 16,206 | |
11/30/1999 | | | 124,962 | | | | 134,002 | | | | 107,933 | | | | 16,630 | |
11/30/2000 | | | 115,668 | | | | 128,346 | | | | 105,958 | | | | 17,204 | |
11/30/2001 | | | 95,236 | | | | 112,670 | | | | 80,512 | | | | 17,530 | |
11/30/2002 | | | 79,002 | | | | 94,072 | | | | 61,957 | | | | 17,915 | |
11/30/2003 | | | 95,764 | | | | 108,259 | | | | 76,078 | | | | 18,231 | |
11/30/2004 | | | 107,251 | | | | 122,166 | | | | 83,259 | | | | 18,874 | |
11/30/2005 | | | 122,035 | | | | 132,473 | | | | 93,933 | | | | 19,526 | |
11/30/2006 | | | 141,138 | | | | 151,311 | | | | 103,032 | | | | 19,911 | |
11/30/2007 | | | 161,965 | | | | 162,985 | | | | 116,323 | | | | 20,768 | |
[end mountain chart]Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
November 30 | | | ’84 | | | | ’85 | | | | ’86 | | | | ’87 | | | | ’88 | | | | ’89 | | | | ’90 | | | | ’91 | | | | ’92 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
reinvested | | | — | | | $ | 199 | | | | 140 | | | | 367 | | | | 315 | | | | 421 | | | | 565 | | | | 588 | | | | 327 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Value at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
year-end2 | | $ | 9,478 | | | | 13,135 | | | | 15,939 | | | | 15,082 | | | | 18,449 | | | | 25,252 | | | | 21,871 | | | | 26,395 | | | | 32,619 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NEF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return | | | (5.2 | )% | | | 38.6 | | | | 21.3 | | | | (5.4 | ) | | | 22.3 | | | | 36.9 | | | | (13.4 | ) | | | 20.7 | | | | 23.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
November 30 | | | ’93 | | | | ’94 | | | | ’95 | | | | ’96 | | | | ’97 | | | | ’98 | | | | ’99 | | | | ’00 | | | | ’01 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
reinvested | | | 189 | | | | 307 | | | | 516 | | | | 578 | | | | 455 | | | | 421 | | | | 540 | | | | 585 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Value at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
year-end2 | | | 42,601 | | | | 41,348 | | | | 50,949 | | | | 58,591 | | | | 71,268 | | | | 88,183 | | | | 124,962 | | | | 115,668 | | | | 95,236 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NEF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return | | | 30.6 | | | | (2.9 | ) | | | 23.2 | | | | 15.0 | | | | 21.6 | | | | 23.7 | | | | 41.7 | | | | (7.4 | ) | | | (17.7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
November 30 | | | ’02 | | | | ’03 | | | | ’04 | | | | ’05 | | | | ’06 | | | | ’07 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
reinvested | | | — | | | | — | | | | 58 | | | | 394 | | | | 791 | | | | 1,031 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Value at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
year-end2 | | | 79,002 | | | | 95,764 | | | | 107,251 | | | | 122,035 | | | | 141,138 | | | | 161,965 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NEF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return | | | (17.0 | ) | | | 21.2 | | | | 12.0 | | | | 13.8 | | | | 15.7 | | | | 14.8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Average annual total return for 24 years: 12.3%
Past results are not predictive of results in future periods. The results shown are before taxes on fund distributions and sale of fund shares.
| 1As outlined in the prospectus, the sales charge is reduced for accounts (and aggregated investments) of $25,000 or more and is eliminated for purchases of $1 million or more. There is no sales charge on dividends or capital gain distributions that are reinvested in additional shares. |
| 2The maximum initial sales charge was 8.5% prior to July 1, 1988. |
| 3All results are calculated with dividends and capital gains reinvested. |
| 4Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index is unmanaged and its results do not reflect the effect of sales charges, commissions or expenses. |
| 5This index tracks 30 U.S. growth funds representing a variety of market capitalizations. |
| 6Computed from data supplied by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. |
A wide lens:
A look at where the fund invests
[photo of a field - trees in the distance]
[Begin Sidebar]
Software and services
Software and services companies made up the largest section of the portfolio as of the fiscal year end, at 11.3%. The industry is fast-growing but tends to favor the larger leaders because of the advantages of branding, network effects, switching costs, and economies of scope and scale. Other parameters that define leaders are the distribution network, support structure and product reliability. California-based Google is the fund’s largest holding; it began in 1998 as an Internet search engine (an indexer of websites and other content) and has grown to include news, images, online spreadsheet sharing and downloadable applications. It continues to develop new avenues for growth. Software giant Microsoft and Internet information conglomerate Yahoo! are also major holdings in this area. Business software maker Oracle and security software maker Symantec are key stocks in the portfolio as well.
[photo of a persons' finger about to push a key on a keyboard]
[End Sidebar]
The New Economy Fund invests in a wide range of companies within the dynamic services and information industries. The fund’s portfolio counselors and investment analysts focus on companies with sustainable business advantages in market segments such as health care, financial services, media, retail, advertising, transportation, telecommunications and technology.
The New Economy Fund’s founding concept is as timely now as it was at its inception more than two decades ago: to capitalize on the profound shift from a manufacturing-dominated economy to one based on services and information companies. The fund’s investment parameters are specific, yet wide and broad-ranging within that context. Services and information companies, working to meet increased demand from consumers around the world, make up about 60% of the world’s equity markets.
“The fund’s objective is to help shareholders participate in the many investment opportunities created as our society focuses on information and services — these areas make up a very large part of the world’s growth engine,” says Gordon Crawford, who has been a portfolio counselor with the fund for 14 years. “It is no longer a time when manufacturing industries, whether plastics or automobiles or toys, drive the U.S. economy.”
Around the world, improvements in per capita income have brought corresponding increases in household consumption. These consumers also gained newfound availability to low-cost credit. Those factors, combined with improvements in local infrastructure and new sources of financing for businesses and consumers, have brought meaningful changes to the world of services and information.
The New Economy Fund likes to focus on strong companies that offer the possibility of solid growth at a reasonable stock price. “Those can be successful new companies, and they can also be well-established companies that have found new ways of creating growth,” says Tim Armour, who has been a portfolio counselor for the fund for 17 years. “We invest in a very broad range of companies.”
Claudia Huntington, a fund portfolio counselor for 13 years, says that she concentrates on finding good companies that can grow through many types of periods. “Many of these companies should benefit from the expected long-term growth in consumer and industrial demand around the world, rather than from fluctuating demand,” she says. “Rising living standards around the world have given rise to populations with new demand for services and information.” In this report, we look at several areas within The New Economy Fund’s investment universe for a deeper understanding of its broad range.
[Begin Sidebar]
Transportation
The transportation industry has been keeping pace with a changing world, with shifts in population and economic centers creating demand for new and expanded transportation systems and services. The New Economy Fund can invest in all modes of transportation, including airlines, road and rail hauling, shippers and infrastructure. Taking advantage of the growing world trade in India, Container Corporation of India ships consumer goods throughout the transport cycle, from India’s ports to warehouses in far-flung cities. Other important holdings in this industry include low-fare airline Ryanair Holdings, with expanding routes across Europe; and U.S.-based package deliverer United Parcel Service, which also provides logistics and business supply-chain solutions such as freight forwarding, customs brokerage, fulfillment, returns and financial transactions.
[photo of the wing of a plane from inside the plane]
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Sidebar]
Medical technology
The global market for health care, medical technology and services is growing at a fast clip, and competition is fierce. The pace of innovations in the medical technology field underscores the importance of careful research. “In researching investment ideas for the med-tech sector, I put a great emphasis on understanding the fundamental attractiveness of each industry as well as its changing dynamism, judging individual investment opportunities through that lens,” says investment analyst Shoko Suzuki, based in Tokyo.
Medical device maker NuVasive develops products to help surgeons treat spine disorders; the California company concentrates solely on spine technology, pioneering a minimally invasive procedure that offers a new approach to spinal fusion. St. Jude Medical, based in Minnesota, develops cardiovascular medical devices for cardiac surgery, cardiology and atrial fibrillation therapy. Smith & Nephew, based in England, makes medical reconstructive devices for orthopedics (hip, knee and shoulder joints).
The health care information technology segment aims to help practitioners and administrators through computer systems. These technologies include electronic medical records, computerized ordering of medical tests, clinical decision support tools and secure exchange of authorized information. In the past few years, many hospitals, clinicians, patient groups and information technology companies have worked together to modernize health information systems. “I have spoken with many doctors and hospital administrators about health care information technology over the last few years, and I’ve noticed a recent increase in interest and commitment,” says investment analyst Aidan O’Connell, who is based in San Francisco. “As older doctors retire, younger doctors, who trained with this type of technology, expect to use it as part of their daily routine.”
Yet another part of the medical services industry is pharmacy benefit management, which controls prescription drug costs for its clients through mail order delivery and the promotion of generic drugs. “The growth for pharmacy benefit managers is fueled by demand for more comprehensive programs for lowering costs,” says Ray Joseph, an investment analyst with the fund. The fund invests in Express Scripts, which provides management services for health maintenance organizations and health insurers; its earnings per share grew 40% in 2007.
[photo of a doctor sitting on a chair while typing on a laptop]
[End Sidebar]
Growth of services
Increasing incomes, shifting demographics and changing technology have catapulted growth in services and information companies. The nonmanufacturing areas of the market have been the engine of growth for the United States for the last few decades. From 1947 to 2006, private service industries’ share of U.S. gross domestic product rose from 48% to 68%. In that same period, the manufacturing component of GDP fell from 26% to 12%. A decline in manufacturing jobs as a share of the workforce began just after World War II and has continued almost without interruption since then. The United States is now overwhelmingly a service economy, with the private service sector providing more than three out of four jobs in the country, according to government statistics.
Worldwide universe of companies
Some of the most attractive investment opportunities in services and information can be found in companies headquartered outside the United States. From its inception, The New Economy Fund has invested outside the United States; its managers may now invest up to 45% of the fund’s net assets abroad. In addition, many of the U.S.-based companies in the fund derive a considerable portion of their revenues from sources outside the U.S.
Over the long term, the strength of China and India, economic and structural reforms in Europe, and growth in Latin America and elsewhere will likely continue to increase living standards around the world. The demand for better health care services, expanded business services, increased access to banking services, quality stores and modern technology should not abate on a global scale.
[Begin Sidebar]
Health care
Health care in the United States and around the world has seen a sustained period of growth and unparalleled change. Fueled by an aging U.S. population and increased global demand for better medical care, the health care services industry is expected to continue to grow. For investors, many companies in this growing area hold promise, offering solutions in such areas as health care services, medical technology and pharmaceuticals. Each year, many new health care products and services are developed, and many of them become successful. The global increase in the prevalence of diabetes, for example, has encouraged companies to develop drugs to fight the disease, says London-based investment analyst Laura Balan. It is estimated that the number of people with diabetes will increase from 246 million to 380 million of the world’s population between 2007 and 2025. Danish company Novo Nordisk, which makes nearly half the world’s commercial insulin supply as well as a broad array of enzyme-based pharmaceuticals, is a significant holding in the fund.
Germany-based Bayer, well known for its aspirin, began in 1863 as a chemicals company; however, it has sold off many of its chemical businesses in recent years to concentrate on health care. It is now one of the world’s top three suppliers of nonprescription medicines. “It is an example of a well-established company that has modified itself to compete and grow,” says fund portfolio counselor Tim Armour. Swiss pharmaceutical company Roche, another top holding, branched into biotechnology with its investment in Genentech, adding to its traditional pharmaceutical products.
[photo of a doctor talking to a patient]
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Sidebar]
Business services
Helping people find jobs is a fast-growing section of the business services world. Companies in this industry match millions of people with jobs, providing temporary and permanent employment to job-seekers with a wide variety of education and work experience. The employment services industry is expected to add nearly 700,000 jobs by 2016, up 20% from the current level, according to the U.S. Labor Department. The fund holds Monster Worldwide, a global online employment solution provider, and Robert Half International, which provides specialized staffing and consulting services.
In other business services areas, office supply distributor United Stationers is the largest broad-line wholesale distributor of business products in North America and is expanding through acquisition into the industrial supply market. Dutch company Corporate Express is one of the world’s largest suppliers of office products — from paper clips to furniture — and is making a push into the janitorial supply business with a new product line of green cleaning products.
[photo of a man looking over a piece of paper - a woman in the background]
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Sidebar]
Financials
The banking industry in the past decade has faced an environment of significant change, including consolidation, globalization and changing demographics. The segment includes commercial banks as well as thrifts and mortgage lenders around the world. “So many countries have not had much access to consumer lending, so as their GDP per capita grows and individual demand for loans increases, these global banking companies stand to benefit,” says London-based Mark Denning, fund portfolio counselor for six years. “The banks are the fuel driving these growing economies.” Not surprisingly, of the roughly two dozen commercial banks that the fund held at the end of the fiscal year, only a few were based in the United States. The largest two of the fund’s holdings in the segment are based in India: ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank. Other significant investments are in Korea’s Pusan Bank, Italy’s UniCredito Italiano, France’s Société Générale, and Mexico’s Grupo Financiero Banorte.
While financials of companies outside of the United States continued to be strong, The New Economy Fund portfolio counselors say they became more interested in U.S. financial institutions in the wake of the credit crunch and its repercussions. The fund added to its holdings in Citigroup, Berkshire Hathaway, American International Group, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo during the past year as their stock prices fell to attractive levels. Fund portfolio counselor Gordon Crawford says, “We believe in their value and growth potential over the long term.”
[photo of a person filling out a form]
[End Sidebar]
Preparing for the future
The New Economy Fund commits substantial resources to global investment research. The fund has five portfolio counselors who each independently manage a portion of the fund, and 20 investment analysts who are responsible for managing the sixth portion: the research portfolio. In addition to these specific participants in the fund, hundreds of investment analysts throughout the organization contribute their ideas and knowledge. Identifying and researching opportunities and understanding the global competition is not easy. To understand companies in the fast-growing services and information industry, we depend on our in-depth investment research. “We have a team of investment analysts who fulfill an important role: They add value because each of them focuses on a specific industry or type of company,” says Tim. “They spend their time on the road talking to company managements, competitors, suppliers and creditors. It’s crucial to be close to the source of information when we make investment decisions.”
The fund’s investment professionals thoroughly know the industries, markets, technologies and best practices in the services and information industry — both inside and outside the United States — and that helps them select the companies they believe will grow and stand the test of time. The portfolio counselors and investment analysts work to understand the environments and complex market dynamics in which these companies operate.
The demand for services and information should only continue to grow. In several areas, including health and education, there are strong forces pushing in the direction of increased demand. Changing demographics around the world should mean more demand for the services, technology and information provided by this vibrant part of the economy.
[Begin Sidebar]
Retail
The health of the U.S. consumer could be weakening, as concerns mount that economic strains will curtail discretionary spending. “Lower housing wealth, slower gains in employment and reduced confidence could hurt consumer spending and could spread to other regions including Europe and Japan,” fund portfolio counselor Gordon Crawford says. “We look for the strongest retail operators that we believe are well positioned for the long term, the ones that can weather a storm.”
The fund holds several retail companies that sell a vast range of products, including Target, a discount U.S. retailer with online shopping and credit card businesses; and Lotte Shopping, a Korean retailer operating department stores, supermarkets and cinemas. The list includes home improvement retailer Lowe’s and electronics giant Best Buy, as well as Walgreens, one of the largest drugstore chains, and membership club warehouse operator Costco Wholesale. The fund also favors a few retail businesses with a focus on specific products, such as Tractor Supply, the largest U.S. retail farm and ranch store chain, and auto parts maker O’Reilly Automotive.
[photo of shopping bags lined up ina row]
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Sidebar]
The New Economy Fund’s portfolio counselors:
A balanced mix of investment styles
The New Economy Fund currently has five portfolio counselors, who bring together a combined 133 years of investment experience. Here are the specific years* of experience for these primary decision-makers in the fund: |
| |
Gordon Crawford | 37 years |
Claudia P. Huntington | 35 years |
Tim Armour | 25 years |
Mark E. Denning | 26 years |
Harold La | 10 years |
| |
*As of February 2008. | |
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Photo Caption]
[photo of Gordon Crawford]
Gordon Crawford
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Photo Caption]
[photo of Claudia P. Huntington]
Claudia P. Huntington
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Photo Caption]
[photo of Tim Armour]
Tim Armour
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Photo Caption]
[photo of Mark E. Denning]
Mark E. Denning
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Photo Caption]
[photo of Harold La]
Harold La
[End Photo Caption]
[Begin Sidebar]
[photo of a bed]
Leisure
Despite some concerns about the slowing U.S. economy, the leisure segment — including gaming, lodging and cruise line industries — could continue to be solid over the long term. With increasing consumer wealth around the world leading to more leisure time, the overall sector could continue to produce exciting growth opportunities.
An example is Las Vegas Sands, which owns the Sands Expo and Convention Center, The Palazzo and The Venetian in Las Vegas, and has expanded into Asia with its Venetian Macao-Resort-Hotel. It is working to develop further gaming and hotel properties in Macao, a former Portuguese colony that is now a territory of China. Shangri-La Asia is a leading hotel chain in Asia, with about 40 hotels (primarily five-star) in Hong Kong, China, the Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia and Fiji, as well as stakes in mixed-use developments in Shanghai and Beijing. Investment analyst Christopher Thomsen says Shangri-La’s premier brand name and earnings should benefit from the regional recovery and increased tourism and business activity. Carnival, a global cruise operator based in Miami, is another large holding in the fund. Carnival recently increased its dividend by 27%, which should be good news for the company’s financial health. It has 12 leading cruise brands catering mainly to customers in North America and Europe.
[End Sidebar]
The following summary investment portfolio is designed to streamline the report and help investors better focus on a fund’s principal holdings. For details on how to obtain a complete schedule of portfolio holdings, please see the inside back cover.
Notes to financial statements
1. | Organization and significant accounting policies |
Organization– The New Economy Fund (the "fund"") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end, diversified management investment company. The fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
The fund offers 14 share classes consisting of four retail share classes, five 529 college savings plan share classes and five retirement plan share classes. The 529 college savings plan share classes (529-A, 529-B, 529-C, 529-E and 529-F) can be utilized to save for college education. The five retirement plan share classes (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5) are sold without any sales charges and do not carry any conversion rights. The fund’s share classes are described below:
Share class | Initial sales charge | Contingent deferred sales charge upon redemption | Conversion feature |
Class A and 529-A | Up to 5.75% | None (except 1% for certain redemptions within one year of purchase without an initial sales charge) | None |
Class B and 529-B | None | Declines from 5% to 0% for redemptions within six years of purchase | Class B and 529-B convert to Class A and 529-A, respectively, after eight years |
Class C | None | 1% for redemptions within one year of purchase | Class C converts to Class F after 10 years |
Class 529-C | None | 1% for redemptions within one year of purchase | None |
Class 529-E | None | None | None |
Class F and 529-F | None | None | None |
Class R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4 and R-5 | None | None | None |
Holders of all share classes have equal pro rata rights to assets, dividends and liquidation proceeds. Each share class has identical voting rights, except for the exclusive right to vote on matters affecting only its class. Share classes have different fees and expenses ("class-specific fees and expenses"), primarily due to different arrangements for distribution, administrative and shareholder services. Differences in class-specific fees and expenses will result in differences in net investment income and, therefore, the payment of different per-share dividends by each class.
Significant accounting policies– The financial statements have been prepared to comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the fund:
Security valuation– Equity securities are valued at the official closing price of, or the last reported sale price on, the exchange or market on which such securities are traded, as of the close of business on the day the securities are being valued or, lacking any sales, at the last available bid price. Prices for each security are taken from the principal exchange or market in which the security trades. Fixed-income securities, including short-term securities purchased with more than 60 days left to maturity, are valued at prices obtained from an independent pricing service when such prices are available. However, where the investment adviser deems it appropriate, such securities will be valued at the mean quoted bid and asked prices (or bid prices, if asked prices are not available) or at prices for securities of comparable maturity, quality and type. Securities with both fixed-income and equity characteristics, or equity securities traded principally among fixed-income dealers, are valued in the manner described above for either equity or fixed-income securities, depending on which method is deemed most appropriate by the investment adviser. Short-term securities purchased within 60 days to maturity are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The value of short-term securities originally purchased with maturities greater than 60 days is determined based on an amortized value to par when they reach 60 days or less remaining to maturity. The ability of the issuers of the debt securities held by the fund to meet their obligations may be affected by economic developments in a specific industry, state or region.
Securities and other assets for which representative market quotations are not readily available or are considered unreliable by the investment adviser are fair valued as determined in good faith under procedures adopted by authority of the fund's board of trustees. Market quotations may be considered unreliable if events occur that materially affect the value of securities (particularly non-U.S. securities) between the close of trading in those securities and the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Various factors may be reviewed in order to make a good faith determination of a security’s fair value. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type and cost of the security; contractual or legal restrictions on resale of the security; relevant financial or business developments of the issuer; actively traded similar or related securities; conversion or exchange rights on the security; related corporate actions; significant events occurring after the close of trading in the security; and changes in overall market conditions.
Security transactions and related investment income– Security transactions are recorded by the fund as of the date the trades are executed with brokers. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are determined based on the specific identified cost of the securities. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Market discounts, premiums and original issue discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized daily over the expected life of the security.
Class allocations – Income, fees and expenses (other than class-specific fees and expenses) and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily among the various share classes based on their relative net assets. Class-specific fees and expenses, such as distribution, administrative and shareholder services, are charged directly to the respective share class.
Dividends and distributions to shareholders– Dividends and distributions paid to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Non-U.S. currency translation– Assets and liabilities, including investment securities, denominated in non-U.S. currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the valuation date. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates on the dates of such transactions. On the accompanying financial statements, the effects of changes in non-U.S. exchange rates on investment securities are included with the net realized gain or loss and net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments. The realized gain or loss and unrealized appreciation or depreciation resulting from all other transactions denominated in non-U.S. currencies are disclosed separately.
Investment risk – The risks of investing in securities of non-U.S. issuers may include, but are not limited to, investment and repatriation restrictions; revaluation of currencies; adverse political, social and economic developments; government involvement in the private sector; limited and less reliable investor information; lack of liquidity; certain local tax law considerations; and limited regulation of the securities markets.
Taxation– Dividend and interest income is recorded net of non-U.S. taxes paid. Gains realized by the fund on the sale of securities in certain countries are subject to non-U.S. taxes. The fund records a liability based on unrealized gains to provide for potential non-U.S. taxes payable upon the sale of these securities. For the year ended November 30, 2007, non-U.S. taxes paid on realized gains were $62,000. As of November 30, 2007, non-U.S. taxes provided on unrealized gains were $1,212,000.
3. | Federal income taxation and distributions |
The fund complies with the requirements under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to mutual funds and intends to distribute substantially all of its net taxable income and net capital gains each year. The fund is not subject to income taxes to the extent such distributions are made. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required.
The fund adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on June 29, 2007. The implementation of FIN 48 resulted in no material liability for unrecognized tax benefits and no material change to the beginning net asset value of the fund.
As of and during the period ended November 30, 2007, the fund did not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the statement of operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
The fund is not subject to examination by U.S. federal tax authorities for tax years before 2003, by state tax authorities for tax years before 2002 and by non-U.S. tax authorities for tax years before 2004.
Distributions– Distributions paid to shareholders are based on net investment income and net realized gains determined on a tax basis, which may differ from net investment income and net realized gains for financial reporting purposes. These differences are due primarily to differing treatment for items such as non-U.S. currency gains and losses; short-term capital gains and losses; net capital losses; and non-U.S. taxes on capital gains. The fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the year in which the net investment income and net realized gains are recorded by the fund for financial reporting purposes. The fund may also designate a portion of the amount paid to redeeming shareholders as a distribution for tax purposes.
During the year ended November 30, 2007, the fund reclassified $1,444,000 from undistributed net investment income to undistributed net realized gains and reclassified $238,000 from undistributed net investment income and $31,000,000 from undistributed net realized gain to capital paid in on shares of beneficial interest to align financial reporting with tax reporting.
As of November 30, 2007, the tax basis components of distributable earnings, unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and cost of investment securities were as follows:
| | | (dollars in thousands) |
Undistributed ordinary income | | | $71,573 |
Post-October non-U.S. currency loss deferrals (realized during the period November 1, 2007 through November 30, 2007)* | | | (16) |
Undistributed long-term capital gain** | | 788,313 |
Gross unrealized appreciation on investment securities | | | 2,467,978 |
Gross unrealized depreciation on investment securities | | | (279,040) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investment securities | | | 2,188,938 |
Cost of investment securities | | | 7,909,397 |
*These deferrals are considered incurred in the subsequent year. | | | |
** Reflects the utilization of capital loss carryforwards of $151,404,000. | | | |
Ordinary income distributions paid to shareholders from net investment income were as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | Year ended November 30 | |
Share class | | 2007 | | | 2006 | |
Class A | | $ | 55,786 | | | $ | 45,629 | |
Class B | | | 102 | | | | - | |
Class C | | | 167 | | | | 36 | |
Class F | | | 2,158 | | | | 807 | |
Class 529-A | | | 573 | | | | 344 | |
Class 529-B | | | 1 | | | | - | |
Class 529-C | | | 23 | | | | - | |
Class 529-E | | | 20 | | | | 12 | |
Class 529-F | | | 18 | | | | 7 | |
Class R-1 | | | 25 | | | | 6 | |
Class R-2 | | | 100 | | | | 32 | |
Class R-3 | | | 349 | | | | 188 | |
Class R-4 | | | 288 | | | | 218 | |
Class R-5 | | | 1,099 | | | | 716 | |
Total | | $ | 60,709 | | | $ | 47,995 | |
4. | Fees and transactions with related parties |
Capital Research and Management Company ("CRMC"), the fund’s investment adviser, is the parent company of American Funds Service Company SM ("AFS"), the fund’s transfer agent, and American Funds Distributors, SM Inc. ("AFD"), the principal underwriter of the fund’s shares.
Investment advisory services - The Investment Advisory and Service Agreement with CRMC provides for monthly fees accrued daily. These fees are based on a declining series of annual rates beginning with 0.580% on the first $500 million of daily net assets and decreasing to 0.345% on such assets in excess of $27 billion. CRMC is currently waiving 10% of investment advisory services fees. During the year ended November 30, 2007, total investment advisory services fees waived by CRMC were $3,793,000. As a result, the fee shown on the accompanying financial statements of $37,932,000, which was equivalent to an annualized rate of 0.401%, was reduced to $34,139,000, or 0.361% of average daily net assets.
Class-specific fees and expenses – Expenses that are specific to individual share classes are accrued directly to the respective share class. The principal class-specific fees and expenses are described below:
Distribution services – The fund has adopted plans of distribution for all share classes, except Class R-5. Under the plans, the board of trustees approves certain categories of expenses that are used to finance activities primarily intended to sell fund shares and service existing accounts. The plans provide for payments, based on an annualized percentage of average daily net assets, ranging from 0.25% to 1.00% as noted on the following page. In some cases, the board of trustees has limited the amounts that may be paid to less than the maximum allowed by the plans. All share classes may use up to 0.25% of average daily net assets to pay service fees, or to compensate AFD for paying service fees, to firms that have entered into agreements with AFD to provide certain shareholder services. The remaining amounts available to be paid under each plan are paid to dealers to compensate them for their sales activities.
For Class A and 529-A, the board of trustees has also approved the reimbursement of dealer and wholesaler commissions paid by AFD for certain shares sold without a sales charge. These classes reimburse AFD for amounts billed within the prior 15 months but only to the extent that the overall annual expense limit of 0.25% is not exceeded. As of November 30, 2007, there were no unreimbursed expenses subject to reimbursement for Class A or 529-A.
Share class | Currently approved limits | Plan limits |
Class A | 0.25% | 0.25% |
Class 529-A | 0.25 | 0.50 |
Class B and 529-B | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Class C, 529-C and R-1 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Class R-2 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
Class 529-E and R-3 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
Class F, 529-F and R-4 | 0.25 | 0.50 |
Transfer agent services– The fund has a transfer agent agreement with AFS for Class A and B. Under this agreement, these share classes compensate AFS for transfer agent services including shareholder recordkeeping, communications and transaction processing. AFS is also compensated for certain transfer agent services provided to all other share classes from the administrative services fees paid to CRMC described below.
Administrative services – The fund has an administrative services agreement with CRMC to provide transfer agent and other related shareholder services for all share classes other than Class A and B. Each relevant share class pays CRMC annual fees up to 0.15% (0.10% for Class R-5) based on its respective average daily net assets. Each relevant share class also pays AFS additional amounts for certain transfer agent services. CRMC and AFS may use these fees to compensate third parties for performing these services. CRMC has agreed to pay AFS on the fund's behalf for a portion of the transfer agent services fees for some of the retirement plan share classes. For the year ended November 30, 2007, the total administrative services fees paid by CRMC were $348 and $78,000 for Class R-1 and R-2, respectively. Administrative services fees are presented gross of any payments made by CRMC. Each 529 share class is subject to an additional annual administrative services fee of 0.10% of its respective average daily net assets; this fee is payable to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the maintenance of the 529 college savings plan. Although these amounts are included with administrative services fees on the accompanying financial statements, the Commonwealth of Virginia is not considered a related party.
Expenses under the agreements described above for the year ended November 30, 2007, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Share class | Distribution services | Transfer agent services | Administrative services |
CRMC administrative services | Transfer agent services | Commonwealth of Virginia administrative services |
Class A | $19,437 | $9,383 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Class B | 2,227 | 257 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Class C | 1,768 | Included in administrative services | $259 | $41 | Not applicable |
Class F | 1,005 | 385 | 84 | Not applicable |
Class 529-A | 178 | 107 | 16 | $ 94 |
Class 529-B | 152 | 17 | 5 | 15 |
Class 529-C | 306 | 35 | 9 | 31 |
Class 529-E | 25 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
Class 529-F | - | 3 | -* | 3 |
Class R-1 | 117 | 14 | 7 | Not applicable |
Class R-2 | 759 | 145 | 348 | Not applicable |
Class R-3 | 503 | 140 | 92 | Not applicable |
Class R-4 | 140 | 74 | 6 | Not applicable |
Class R-5 | Not applicable | 135 | 3 | Not applicable |
Total | $26,617 | $9,640 | $1,320 | $612 | $148 |
* Amount less than one thousand.
Trustees’ deferred compensation– Since the adoption of the deferred compensation plan in 1993, trustees who are unaffiliated with CRMC may elect to defer the cash payment of part or all of their compensation. These deferred amounts, which remain as liabilities of the fund, are treated as if invested in shares of the fund or other American Funds. These amounts represent general, unsecured liabilities of the fund and vary according to the total returns of the selected funds. Trustees’ compensation of $666,000, shown on the accompanying financial statements, includes $415,000 in current fees (either paid in cash or deferred) and a net increase of $251,000 in the value of the deferred amounts.
Affiliated officers and trustees – Officers and certain trustees of the fund are or may be considered to be affiliated with CRMC, AFS and AFD. No affiliated officers or trustees received any compensation directly from the fund.
5. | Capital share transactions |
Capital share transactions in the fund were as follows (dollars and shares in thousands):
Share class | | Sales* | | | Reinvestments of dividends | | | Repurchases* | | | Net (decrease) increase | |
| | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | |
Year ended November 30, 2007 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 793,077 | | | | 27,880 | | | $ | 53,126 | | | | 1,986 | | | $ | (1,155,975 | ) | | | (40,717 | ) | | $ | (309,772 | ) | | | (10,851 | ) |
Class B | | | 27,358 | | | | 998 | | | | 99 | | | | 4 | | | | (28,709 | ) | | | (1,053 | ) | | | (1,252 | ) | | | (51 | ) |
Class C | | | 88,336 | | | | 3,235 | | | | 161 | | | | 7 | | | | (31,565 | ) | | | (1,159 | ) | | | 56,932 | | | | 2,083 | |
Class F | | | 294,236 | | | | 10,468 | | | | 2,013 | | | | 76 | | | | (78,516 | ) | | | (2,771 | ) | | | 217,733 | | | | 7,773 | |
Class 529-A | | | 28,738 | | | | 1,019 | | | | 573 | | | | 21 | | | | (6,713 | ) | | | (237 | ) | | | 22,598 | | | | 803 | |
Class 529-B | | | 2,868 | | | | 104 | | | | 1 | | | | - | † | | | (830 | ) | | | (30 | ) | | | 2,039 | | | | 74 | |
Class 529-C | | | 11,470 | | | | 416 | | | | 23 | | | | 1 | | | | (2,562 | ) | | | (93 | ) | | | 8,931 | | | | 324 | |
Class 529-E | | | 1,524 | | | | 54 | | | | 20 | | | | 1 | | | | (550 | ) | | | (20 | ) | | | 994 | | | | 35 | |
Class 529-F | | | 1,419 | | | | 50 | | | | 18 | | | | 1 | | | | (165 | ) | | | (6 | ) | | | 1,272 | | | | 45 | |
Class R-1 | | | 9,533 | | | | 339 | | | | 24 | | | | 1 | | | | (4,539 | ) | | | (161 | ) | | | 5,018 | | | | 179 | |
Class R-2 | | | 42,444 | | | | 1,530 | | | | 100 | | | | 3 | | | | (27,509 | ) | | | (988 | ) | | | 15,035 | | | | 545 | |
Class R-3 | | | 69,890 | | | | 2,469 | | | | 349 | | | | 13 | | | | (35,803 | ) | | | (1,261 | ) | | | 34,436 | | | | 1,221 | |
Class R-4 | | | 42,330 | | | | 1,474 | | | | 286 | | | | 11 | | | | (16,084 | ) | | | (557 | ) | | | 26,532 | | | | 928 | |
Class R-5 | | | 70,281 | | | | 2,390 | | | | 1,042 | | | | 39 | | | | (16,029 | ) | | | (554 | ) | | | 55,294 | | | | 1,875 | |
Total net increase | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(decrease) | | $ | 1,483,504 | | | | 52,426 | | | $ | 57,835 | | | | 2,164 | | | $ | (1,405,549 | ) | | | (49,607 | ) | | $ | 135,790 | | | | 4,983 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended November 30, 2006 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 653,097 | | | | 26,937 | | | $ | 43,554 | | | | 1,851 | | | $ | (1,114,532 | ) | | | (46,210 | ) | | $ | (417,881 | ) | | | (17,422 | ) |
Class B | | | 22,735 | | | | 975 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (28,150 | ) | | | (1,212 | ) | | | (5,415 | ) | | | (237 | ) |
Class C | | | 44,990 | | | | 1,934 | | | | 35 | | | | 2 | | | | (20,711 | ) | | | (901 | ) | | | 24,314 | | | | 1,035 | |
Class F | | | 138,188 | | | | 5,583 | | | | 755 | | | | 32 | | | | (28,310 | ) | | | (1,169 | ) | | | 110,633 | | | | 4,446 | |
Class 529-A | | | 18,635 | | | | 772 | | | | 344 | | | | 15 | | | | (4,216 | ) | | | (176 | ) | | | 14,763 | | | | 611 | |
Class 529-B | | | 2,231 | | | | 95 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (467 | ) | | | (20 | ) | | | 1,764 | | | | 75 | |
Class 529-C | | | 7,053 | | | | 299 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (1,282 | ) | | | (54 | ) | | | 5,771 | | | | 245 | |
Class 529-E | | | 1,066 | | | | 45 | | | | 12 | | | | - | † | | | (287 | ) | | | (12 | ) | | | 791 | | | | 33 | |
Class 529-F | | | 854 | | | | 36 | | | | 7 | | | | - | † | | | (119 | ) | | | (5 | ) | | | 742 | | | | 31 | |
Class R-1 | | | 4,939 | | | | 210 | | | | 6 | | | | - | † | | | (1,525 | ) | | | (64 | ) | | | 3,420 | | | | 146 | |
Class R-2 | | | 31,792 | | | | 1,344 | | | | 32 | | | | 2 | | | | (17,631 | ) | | | (747 | ) | | | 14,193 | | | | 599 | |
Class R-3 | | | 36,225 | | | | 1,507 | | | | 188 | | | | 8 | | | | (19,033 | ) | | | (788 | ) | | | 17,380 | | | | 727 | |
Class R-4 | | | 16,534 | | | | 686 | | | | 218 | | | | 9 | | | | (12,638 | ) | | | (524 | ) | | | 4,114 | | | | 171 | |
Class R-5 | | | 31,564 | | | | 1,285 | | | | 670 | | | | 29 | | | | (12,188 | ) | | | (504 | ) | | | 20,046 | | | | 810 | |
Total net increase | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(decrease) | | $ | 1,009,903 | | | | 41,708 | | | $ | 45,821 | | | | 1,948 | | | $ | (1,261,089 | ) | | | (52,386 | ) | | $ | (205,365 | ) | | | (8,730 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
* Includes exchanges between share classes of the fund. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
† Amount less than one thousand. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6. | Investment transactions |
The fund made purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, of $3,459,973,000 and $4,021,946,000, respectively, during the year ended November 30, 2007.
Financial highlights
| | | | Income from investment operations(1) | Dividends and distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Net asset value, beginning of year | Net investment income (loss) | Net gains on securities (both realized and unrealized) | Total from investment operations | Dividends (from net investment income) | Distributions (from capital gains) | Total dividends and distributions | Net asset value, end of year | Total return (2) (3) | Net assets, end of year (in millions) | Ratio of expenses to average net assets before reimbursements/ waivers | Ratio of expenses to average net assets after reimbursements/ waivers (3) | Ratio of net income (loss) to average net assets (3) |
Class A: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | $26.41 | | $.25 | | | $3.62 | | | $3.87 | | $(.19) | | - | | $(.19) | | $30.09 | | 14.75% | | $8,394 | | .80% | | .76% | | .87% | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.98 | | .20 | | | 3.38 | | | 3.58 | | (.15) | | - | | (.15) | | 26.41 | | 15.65 | | 7,654 | | .82 | | .78 | | .83 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 20.27 | | .15 | | | 2.63 | | | 2.78 | | (.07) | | - | | (.07) | | 22.98 | | 13.79 | | 7,061 | | .83 | | .79 | | .73 | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 18.11 | | .06 | | | 2.11 | | | 2.17 | | (.01) | | - | | (.01) | | 20.27 | | 12.00 | | 6,938 | | .84 | | .84 | | .32 | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.94 | | .01 | | | 3.16 | | | 3.17 | | - | | - | | - | | 18.11 | | 21.22 | | 6,671 | | .89 | | .89 | | .09 | |
Class B: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 25.30 | | .03 | | | 3.48 | | | 3.51 | | (.01) | | - | | (.01) | | 28.80 | | 13.89 | | 234 | | 1.56 | | 1.52 | | .11 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.05 | | .01 | | | 3.24 | | | 3.25 | | - | | - | | - | | 25.30 | | 14.74 | | 207 | | 1.59 | | 1.55 | | .06 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 19.52 | | (.01) | | | 2.54 | | | 2.53 | | - | | - | | - | | 22.05 | | 12.96 | | 185 | | 1.60 | | 1.57 | | (.05) | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 17.57 | | (.08) | | | 2.03 | | | 1.95 | | - | | - | | - | | 19.52 | | 11.10 | | 172 | | 1.62 | | 1.62 | | (.45) | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.61 | | (.11) | | | 3.07 | | | 2.96 | | - | | - | | - | | 17.57 | | 20.26 | | 144 | | 1.68 | | 1.68 | | (.70) | |
Class C: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 25.18 | | .02 | | | 3.46 | | | 3.48 | | (.03) | | - | | (.03) | | 28.63 | | 13.84 | | 215 | | 1.61 | | 1.57 | | .06 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 21.96 | | - | (4) | | 3.23 | | | 3.23 | | (.01) | | - | | (.01) | | 25.18 | | 14.70 | | 136 | | 1.64 | | 1.60 | | .01 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 19.46 | | (.02) | | | 2.52 | | | 2.50 | | - | | - | | - | | 21.96 | | 12.85 | | 96 | | 1.65 | | 1.61 | | (.09) | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 17.52 | | (.09) | | | 2.03 | | | 1.94 | | - | | - | | - | | 19.46 | | 11.07 | | 76 | | 1.66 | | 1.65 | | (.47) | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.57 | | (.11) | | | 3.06 | | | 2.95 | | - | | - | | - | | 17.52 | | 20.25 | | 51 | | 1.69 | | 1.69 | | (.73) | |
Class F: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 26.28 | | .25 | | | 3.60 | | | 3.85 | | (.22) | | - | | (.22) | | 29.91 | | 14.76 | | 515 | | .80 | | .76 | | .88 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.88 | | .19 | | | 3.37 | | | 3.56 | | (.16) | | - | | (.16) | | 26.28 | | 15.63 | | 248 | | .83 | | .79 | | .81 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 20.19 | | .15 | | | 2.62 | | | 2.77 | | (.08) | | - | | (.08) | | 22.88 | | 13.77 | | 114 | | .86 | | .83 | | .70 | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 18.07 | | .06 | | | 2.09 | | | 2.15 | | (.03) | | - | | (.03) | | 20.19 | | 11.89 | | 72 | | .89 | | .88 | | .32 | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.91 | | .01 | | | 3.15 | | | 3.16 | | - | | - | | - | | 18.07 | | 21.19 | | 40 | | .91 | | .91 | | .04 | |
Class 529-A: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 26.34 | | .23 | | | 3.61 | | | 3.84 | | (.20) | | - | | (.20) | | 29.98 | | 14.66 | | 109 | | .86 | | .82 | | .81 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.93 | | .19 | | | 3.37 | | | 3.56 | | (.15) | | - | | (.15) | | 26.34 | | 15.61 | | 75 | | .85 | | .81 | | .80 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 20.24 | | .14 | | | 2.63 | | | 2.77 | | (.08) | | - | | (.08) | | 22.93 | | 13.74 | | 51 | | .87 | | .84 | | .69 | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 18.11 | | .06 | | | 2.10 | | | 2.16 | | (.03) | | - | | (.03) | | 20.24 | | 11.96 | | 35 | | .87 | | .86 | | .33 | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.93 | | .02 | | | 3.16 | | | 3.18 | | - | | - | | - | | 18.11 | | 21.30 | | 20 | | .85 | | .85 | | .11 | |
Class 529-B: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 25.54 | | (.01) | | | 3.52 | | | 3.51 | | - | (4) | - | | - | (4) | 29.05 | | 13.75 | | 17 | | 1.69 | | 1.65 | | (.02) | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.28 | | (.02) | | | 3.28 | | | 3.26 | | - | | - | | - | | 25.54 | | 14.63 | | 13 | | 1.72 | | 1.68 | | (.07) | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 19.76 | | (.04) | | | 2.56 | | | 2.52 | | - | | - | | - | | 22.28 | | 12.75 | | 10 | | 1.76 | | 1.72 | | (.20) | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 17.82 | | (.11) | | | 2.05 | | | 1.94 | | - | | - | | - | | 19.76 | | 10.89 | | 7 | | 1.78 | | 1.78 | | (.58) | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.83 | | (.13) | | | 3.12 | | | 2.99 | | - | | - | | - | | 17.82 | | 20.16 | | 4 | | 1.81 | | 1.81 | | (.86) | |
Class 529-C: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 25.55 | | - | (4) | | 3.51 | | | 3.51 | | (.02) | | - | | (.02) | | 29.04 | | 13.77 | | 36 | | 1.68 | | 1.64 | | (.02) | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.30 | | (.01) | | | 3.26 | | | 3.25 | | - | | - | | - | | 25.55 | | 14.57 | | 24 | | 1.71 | | 1.67 | | (.06) | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 19.77 | | (.04) | | | 2.57 | | | 2.53 | | - | | - | | - | | 22.30 | | 12.80 | | 15 | | 1.75 | | 1.71 | | (.18) | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 17.83 | | (.11) | | | 2.05 | | | 1.94 | | - | | - | | - | | 19.77 | | 10.88 | | 10 | | 1.77 | | 1.76 | | (.57) | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.84 | | (.13) | | | 3.12 | | | 2.99 | | - | | - | | - | | 17.83 | | 20.15 | | 5 | | 1.80 | | 1.80 | | (.84) | |
Class 529-E: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 26.11 | | .14 | | | 3.58 | | | 3.72 | | (.12) | | - | | (.12) | | 29.71 | | 14.32 | | 6 | | 1.17 | | 1.13 | | .50 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.75 | | .11 | | | 3.34 | | | 3.45 | | (.09) | | - | | (.09) | | 26.11 | | 15.22 | | 4 | | 1.18 | | 1.14 | | .47 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 20.09 | | .07 | | | 2.61 | | | 2.68 | | (.02) | | - | | (.02) | | 22.75 | | 13.37 | | 3 | | 1.22 | | 1.18 | | .35 | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 18.01 | | (.01) | | | 2.09 | | | 2.08 | | - | | - | | - | | 20.09 | | 11.55 | | 2 | | 1.23 | | 1.23 | | (.03) | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.91 | | (.05) | | | 3.15 | | | 3.10 | | - | | - | | - | | 18.01 | | 20.79 | | 1 | | 1.25 | | 1.25 | | (.30) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-F: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | $26.34 | | $.28 | | | $3.62 | | | $3.90 | | $(.24) | | - | | $(.24) | | $30.00 | | 14.92% | | $3 | | .67% | | .63% | | .99% | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.92 | | .23 | | | 3.36 | | | 3.59 | | (.17) | | - | | (.17) | | 26.34 | | 15.77 | | 2 | | .68 | | .64 | | .97 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 20.20 | | .16 | | | 2.63 | | | 2.79 | | (.07) | | - | | (.07) | | 22.92 | | 13.84 | | 1 | | .81 | | .77 | | .76 | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 18.09 | | .04 | | | 2.09 | | | 2.13 | | (.02) | | - | | (.02) | | 20.20 | | 11.79 | | 1 | | .98 | | .98 | | .23 | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.94 | | (.01) | | | 3.16 | | | 3.15 | | - | | - | | - | | 18.09 | | 21.08 | | - | (5) | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | (.04) | |
Class R-1: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 25.74 | | .01 | | | 3.54 | | | 3.55 | | (.07) | | - | | (.07) | | 29.22 | | 13.84 | | 15 | | 1.61 | | 1.57 | | .04 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.47 | | - | (4) | | 3.30 | | | 3.30 | | (.03) | | - | | (.03) | | 25.74 | | 14.72 | | 8 | | 1.64 | | 1.58 | | .01 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 19.90 | | (.02) | | | 2.59 | | | 2.57 | | - | | - | | - | | 22.47 | | 12.91 | | 4 | | 1.70 | | 1.61 | | (.09) | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 17.92 | | (.08) | | | 2.06 | | | 1.98 | | - | | - | | - | | 19.90 | | 11.05 | | 2 | | 1.76 | | 1.65 | | (.44) | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.90 | | (.11) | | | 3.13 | | | 3.02 | | - | | - | | - | | 17.92 | | 20.27 | | 1 | | 1.96 | | 1.66 | | (.69) | |
Class R-2: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 25.77 | | .02 | | | 3.54 | | | 3.56 | | (.03) | | - | | (.03) | | 29.30 | | 13.83 | | 113 | | 1.67 | | 1.56 | | .07 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.47 | | .01 | | | 3.30 | | | 3.31 | | (.01) | | - | | (.01) | | 25.77 | | 14.74 | | 85 | | 1.81 | | 1.58 | | .04 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 19.90 | | (.01) | | | 2.58 | | | 2.57 | | - | | - | | - | | 22.47 | | 12.91 | | 61 | | 1.91 | | 1.58 | | (.05) | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 17.92 | | (.08) | | | 2.06 | | | 1.98 | | - | | - | | - | | 19.90 | | 11.05 | | 44 | | 2.03 | | 1.61 | | (.40) | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.88 | | (.11) | | | 3.15 | | | 3.04 | | - | | - | | - | | 17.92 | | 20.43 | | 21 | | 2.35 | | 1.62 | | (.68) | |
Class R-3: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 26.11 | | .14 | | | 3.59 | | | 3.73 | | (.12) | | - | | (.12) | | 29.72 | | 14.34 | | 123 | | 1.17 | | 1.13 | | .50 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.75 | | .10 | | | 3.34 | | | 3.44 | | (.08) | | - | | (.08) | | 26.11 | | 15.18 | | 76 | | 1.22 | | 1.18 | | .44 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 20.10 | | .07 | | | 2.61 | | | 2.68 | | (.03) | | - | | (.03) | | 22.75 | | 13.35 | | 50 | | 1.24 | | 1.19 | | .33 | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 18.03 | | - | (4) | | 2.07 | | | 2.07 | | - | | - | | - | | 20.10 | | 11.48 | | 35 | | 1.26 | | 1.23 | | (.02) | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.92 | | (.05) | | | 3.16 | | | 3.11 | | - | | - | | - | | 18.03 | | 20.84 | | 17 | | 1.37 | | 1.24 | | (.29) | |
Class R-4: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 26.34 | | .24 | | | 3.62 | | | 3.86 | | (.19) | | - | | (.19) | | 30.01 | | 14.74 | | 73 | | .83 | | .79 | | .83 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 22.94 | | .19 | | | 3.37 | | | 3.56 | | (.16) | | - | | (.16) | | 26.34 | | 15.61 | | 40 | | .86 | | .82 | | .79 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 20.25 | | .15 | | | 2.63 | | | 2.78 | | (.09) | | - | | (.09) | | 22.94 | | 13.76 | | 31 | | .86 | | .82 | | .70 | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 18.12 | | .07 | | | 2.09 | | | 2.16 | | (.03) | | - | | (.03) | | 20.25 | | 11.92 | | 17 | | .86 | | .85 | | .34 | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.94 | | .01 | | | 3.17 | | | 3.18 | | - | | - | | - | | 18.12 | | 21.28 | | 10 | | .88 | | .88 | | .09 | |
Class R-5: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | 26.54 | | .32 | | | 3.64 | | | 3.96 | | (.26) | | - | | (.26) | | 30.24 | | 15.06 | | 181 | | .54 | | .50 | | 1.12 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | 23.10 | | .27 | | | 3.38 | | | 3.65 | | (.21) | | - | | (.21) | | 26.54 | | 15.94 | | 109 | | .55 | | .51 | | 1.10 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | 20.37 | | .21 | | | 2.65 | | | 2.86 | | (.13) | | - | | (.13) | | 23.10 | | 14.14 | | 76 | | .55 | | .52 | | 1.02 | |
Year ended 11/30/2004 | | 18.21 | | .12 | | | 2.10 | | | 2.22 | | (.06) | | - | | (.06) | | 20.37 | | 12.26 | | 51 | | .55 | | .55 | | .62 | |
Year ended 11/30/2003 | | 14.97 | | .06 | | | 3.18 | | | 3.24 | | - | | - | | - | | 18.21 | | 21.64 | | 44 | | .56 | | .56 | | .41 | |
| | Year ended November 30 | |
| | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | 2003 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio turnover rate for all classes of shares | | | 40 | % | | | 41 | % | | | 32 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 38 | % |
(1) Based on average shares outstanding. |
(2) Total returns exclude all sales charges, including contingent deferred sales charges. |
(3) This column reflects the impact, if any, of certain reimbursements/waivers from CRMC. |
During some of the years shown, |
CRMC reduced fees for investment advisory services. In addition, during |
some of the years shown, CRMC paid a portion of the fund's transfer agent fees for certain retirement plan share classes. |
(4) Amount less than $.01. |
(5) Amount less than $1 million. |
|
See Notes to Financial Statements |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of The New Economy Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the summary investment portfolio, of The New Economy Fund (the “Fund”), as of November 30, 2007, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2007, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The New Economy Fund as of November 30, 2007, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, California
January 9, 2008
Expense example unaudited
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs such as initial sales charges on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions (loads); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund so you can compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (June 1, 2007, through November 30, 2007).
Actual expenses:
The first line of each share class in the table on the next page provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled "Expenses paid during period" to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes:
The second line of each share class in the table on the next page provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio for the share class and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of the share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5.00% hypothetical example with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Notes:
There are some account fees that are charged to certain types of accounts, such as Individual Retirement Accounts and 529 college savings plan accounts (generally, a $10 fee is charged to set up the account and an additional $10 fee is charged to the account annually) that would increase the amount of expenses paid on your account. In addition, retirement plan participants may be subject to certain fees charged by the plan sponsor, and Class F and 529-F shareholders may be subject to fees charged by financial intermediaries, typically ranging from 0.75% to 1.50% of assets annually depending on services offered. You can estimate the impact of these fees by adding the amount of the fees to the total estimated expenses you paid on your account during the period as calculated above. In addition, your ending account value would also be lower by the amount of these fees.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line of each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | Beginning account value 6/1/2007 | | | Ending account value 11/30/2007 | | | Expenses paid during period* | | | Annualized expense ratio | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A -- actual return | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,035.79 | | | $ | 3.83 | | | | .75 | % |
Class A -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,021.31 | | | | 3.80 | | | | .75 | |
Class B -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,031.53 | | | | 7.69 | | | | 1.51 | |
Class B -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,017.50 | | | | 7.64 | | | | 1.51 | |
Class C -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,031.34 | | | | 7.99 | | | | 1.57 | |
Class C -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,017.20 | | | | 7.94 | | | | 1.57 | |
Class F -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,035.66 | | | | 3.88 | | | | .76 | |
Class F -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,021.26 | | | | 3.85 | | | | .76 | |
Class 529-A -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,035.21 | | | | 4.13 | | | | .81 | |
Class 529-A -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,021.01 | | | | 4.10 | | | | .81 | |
Class 529-B -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,031.25 | | | | 8.35 | | | | 1.64 | |
Class 529-B -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,016.85 | | | | 8.29 | | | | 1.64 | |
Class 529-C -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,030.89 | | | | 8.35 | | | | 1.64 | |
Class 529-C -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,016.85 | | | | 8.29 | | | | 1.64 | |
Class 529-E -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,033.76 | | | | 5.76 | | | | 1.13 | |
Class 529-E -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,019.40 | | | | 5.72 | | | | 1.13 | |
Class 529-F -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,036.26 | | | | 3.22 | | | | .63 | |
Class 529-F -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,021.91 | | | | 3.19 | | | | .63 | |
Class R-1 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,031.41 | | | | 7.94 | | | | 1.56 | |
Class R-1 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,017.25 | | | | 7.89 | | | | 1.56 | |
Class R-2 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,031.33 | | | | 7.94 | | | | 1.56 | |
Class R-2 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,017.25 | | | | 7.89 | | | | 1.56 | |
Class R-3 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,033.75 | | | | 5.71 | | | | 1.12 | |
Class R-3 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,019.45 | | | | 5.67 | | | | 1.12 | |
Class R-4 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,035.56 | | | | 4.08 | | | | .80 | |
Class R-4 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,021.06 | | | | 4.05 | | | | .80 | |
Class R-5 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,037.05 | | | | 2.50 | | | | .49 | |
Class R-5 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,022.61 | | | | 2.48 | | | | .49 | |
*The “expenses paid during period” are equal to the “annualized expense ratio,” multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period (183), and divided by 365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
Tax information
unaudited
We are required to advise you within 60 days of the fund’s fiscal year-end regarding the federal tax status of certain distributions received by shareholders during such fiscal year. The fund hereby designates the following amounts for the fund’s fiscal year ended November 30, 2007:
Long-term capital gains | | $ | 31,000,000 | |
Qualified dividend income | | | 100 | % |
Corporate dividends received deduction | | $ | 39,682,000 | |
U.S. government income that may be exempt from state taxation | | $ | 1,389,000 | |
Individual shareholders should refer to their Form 1099 or other tax information, which will be mailed in January 2008, to determine the calendar year amounts to be included on their 2007 tax returns. Shareholders should consult their tax advisers.
Approval of Investment Advisory and Service Agreement
The fund’s board has approved the fund’s Investment Advisory and Service Agreement (the “agreement”) with Capital Research and Management Company (“CRMC”) for an additional one-year term through November 30, 2008. The board approved the agreement following the recommendation of the fund’s Contracts Committee (the “committee”), which is composed of all of the fund’s independent board members. The board and the committee determined that the fund’s advisory fee structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided and that approving the agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
In reaching this decision, the board and the committee took into account information furnished to them throughout the year, as well as information prepared specifically in connection with their review of the agreement and were advised by their independent counsel. They considered the factors discussed below, among others, but did not identify any single issue or particular piece of information that, in isolation, was the controlling factor.
1. Nature, extent and quality of services
The board and the committee considered the depth and quality of CRMC’s investment management process, including its global research capabilities; the experience, capability and integrity of its senior management and other personnel; the low turnover rates of its key personnel; the overall financial strength and stability of its organization; and the ongoing evolution of CRMC’s organizational structure designed to maintain and strengthen these qualities. The board and the committee also considered the nature, extent and quality of administrative, compliance and shareholder services provided by CRMC to the fund under the agreement and other agreements as well as the benefits to fund shareholders from investing in a fund that is part of a large family of funds. The board and the committee concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by CRMC have benefited and should continue to benefit the fund and its shareholders.
2. Investment results
The board and the committee considered the investment results of the fund in light of its objective of providing long-term growth of capital. They compared the fund’s total returns with those of other relevant funds (including the other funds that are the basis of the Lipper index for the category in which the fund is included) and market data such as relevant market indices. This report, including the letter to shareholders and related disclosures, contains certain information about the fund’s investment results. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s short- and long-term results have been satisfactory and that CRMC’s record in managing the fund indicated that its continued management should benefit the fund and its shareholders.
3. Advisory fees and total expenses
The board and the committee compared the advisory fees and total expense levels of the fund to those of other relevant funds. They observed that the fund’s advisory fees and expenses remain significantly below those of most other relevant funds. The board and the committee also noted the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure that reduce the level of fees charged by CRMC to the fund as fund assets increase and the 10% advisory fee waiver in effect since April 2005. In addition, they reviewed information regarding the advisory fees paid by institutional clients of an affiliate of CRMC with investment mandates similar to those of the fund. They noted that, although the fees paid by those clients generally were lower than those paid by the fund, the differences appropriately reflected the significant investment, operational and regulatory differences between advising mutual funds and institutional clients. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s cost structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided, and that the shareholders receive reasonable value in return for the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
4. Ancillary benefits
The board and the committee considered a variety of other benefits received by CRMC and its affiliates as a result of CRMC’s relationship with the fund and the other American Funds, including fees for administrative services provided to certain share classes; fees paid to CRMC’s affiliated transfer agent; sales charges and distribution fees received and retained by the fund’s principal underwriter, an affiliate of CRMC; and possible ancillary benefits to CRMC’s institutional management affiliates. The board and the committee reviewed CRMC’s portfolio trading practices, noting that while CRMC receives the benefit of research provided by broker-dealers executing portfolio transactions on behalf of the fund, it does not obtain third-party research or other services in return for allocating brokerage to such broker-dealers. The board and the committee took these ancillary benefits into account in evaluating the reasonableness of the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
5. Adviser financial information
The board and the committee reviewed information regarding CRMC’s costs of providing services to the American Funds, including personnel, systems and resources of investment, compliance, trading, accounting and other administrative operations. They considered CRMC’s costs and willingness to invest in technology, infrastructure and staff to maintain and expand services and capabilities, respond to industry and regulatory developments and attract and retain qualified personnel. They noted information previously received regarding the compensation structure for CRMC’s investment professionals. The board and the committee also compared CRMC’s profitability to the reported results of several large, publicly held investment management companies. The board and the committee noted the competitiveness and cyclicality of both the mutual fund industry and the capital markets, and the importance in that environment of CRMC’s long-term profitability for maintaining its independence, company culture and management continuity. They further considered the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure and the impact of CRMC’s current 10% advisory fee waiver, reflecting benefits that may accrue from growth in assets. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s advisory fee structure reflected a reasonable sharing of benefits between CRMC and the fund’s shareholders.
Board of trustees and other officers
“Independent” trustees | | |
| | |
| Year first | |
| elected | |
| a trustee | |
Name and age | of the fund1 | Principal occupation(s) during past five years |
| | |
Joseph C. Berenato, 61 | 2000 | Chairman of the Board, President and CEO, Ducommun Incorporated (aerospace components manufacturer) |
| | |
Ambassador | 1993 | Corporate director and author; former U.S. |
Richard G. Capen, Jr., 73 | | Ambassador to Spain; former Vice Chairman, Knight-Ridder, Inc. (communications company); former Chairman and Publisher, The Miami Herald |
| | |
H. Frederick Christie, 74 | 1983 | Private investor; former President and CEO, The Mission Group (non-utility holding company, subsidiary of Southern California Edison Company) |
| | |
John G. Freund, 54 | 2000 | Founder and Managing Director, Skyline Ventures (venture capital investor in health care companies) |
| | |
R. Clark Hooper, 61 | 2006 | Private investor; former President, Dumbarton Group LLC (securities industry consulting); former Executive Vice President — Policy and Oversight, NASD |
| | |
Leonade D. Jones, 60 | 1995 | Co-founder, VentureThink LLC (developed and managed e-commerce businesses) and Versura Inc. (education loan exchange); former Treasurer, The Washington Post Company |
| | |
William H. Kling, 65 | 1987 | President and CEO, American Public Media Group |
Chairman of the Board | | |
(Independent and | | |
Non-Executive) | | |
| | |
Christopher E. Stone, 51 | 2007 | Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Professor of the Practice of Criminal Justice, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University; President and Director, Vera Institute of Justice |
| | |
Patricia K. Woolf, Ph.D., 73 | 1984 | Private investor; corporate director; former Lecturer, Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University |
| | |
| | |
“Independent” trustees | | |
| | |
| Number of | |
| portfolios | |
| in fund | |
| complex2 | |
| overseen by | |
Name and age | trustee | Other directorships3 held by trustee |
| | |
Joseph C. Berenato, 61 | 6 | Ducommun Incorporated |
| | |
Ambassador | 15 | Carnival Corporation |
Richard G. Capen, Jr., 73 | | |
| | |
H. Frederick Christie, 74 | 21 | AECOM Technology Corporation; Ducommun Incorporated; IHOP Corporation; Southwest Water Company |
| | |
John G. Freund, 54 | 2 | Hansen Medical, Inc.; MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; XenoPort, Inc. |
| | |
R. Clark Hooper, 61 | 18 | JPMorgan Value Opportunities Fund; The Swiss Helvetia Fund Inc. |
| | |
Leonade D. Jones, 60 | 6 | None |
| | |
William H. Kling, 65 | 8 | Irwin Financial Corporation |
Chairman of the Board | | |
(Independent and | | |
Non-Executive) | | |
| | |
Christopher E. Stone, 51 | 2 | None |
| | |
Patricia K. Woolf, Ph.D., 73 | 6 | None |
| | |
| | |
“Interested” trustees4 | | |
| | |
| Year first | |
| elected a | |
| trustee or | Principal occupation(s) during past five years and |
Name, age and | officer of | positions held with affiliated entities or the principal |
position with fund | the fund¹ | underwriter of the fund |
| | |
Gordon Crawford, 61 | 1999 | Senior Vice President — Capital Research Global |
Vice Chairman of the Board | | Investors, Capital Research and Management Company; Director, The Capital Group Companies, Inc.5 |
| | |
Timothy D. Armour, 47 | 1991 | President and Director, Capital Research and |
President | | Management Company; Senior Vice President —Capital Research Global Investors, Capital Research and Management Company; Director, The Capital Group Companies, Inc.5 |
| | |
| | |
“Interested” trustees4 | | |
| | |
| Number of | |
| portfolios in | |
| fund complex2 | |
Name, age and | overseen | |
position with fund | by trustee | Other directorships3 held by trustee |
| | |
Gordon Crawford, 61 | 2 | None |
Vice Chairman of the Board | | |
| | |
Timothy D. Armour, 47 | 1 | None |
President | | |
The statement of additional information includes additional information about fund trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling American Funds Service Company at 800/421-0180. The address for all trustees and officers of the fund is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071, Attention: Secretary.
Please see page 32 for footnotes.
Other officers
| Year first | |
| elected an | Principal occupation(s) during past five years and |
Name, age and | officer of | positions held with affiliated entities or the principal |
position with fund | the fund¹ | underwriter of the fund |
| | |
Paul F. Roye, 54 | 2007 | Senior Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Executive Vice President | | Group, Capital Reseach and Management Company; Director, American Funds Service Company;5 former Director of Investment Management, United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
| | |
Mark E. Denning, 50 | 2006 | Senior Vice President — Capital Research Global |
Senior Vice President | | Investors, Capital Research Company;5 Director, Capital Research and Management Company; Director, Capital International Limited5 |
| | |
Claudia P. Huntington, 55 | 1996 | Senior Vice President — Capital Research Global |
Senior Vice President | | Investors, Capital Research and Management Company; Director, The Capital Group Companies, Inc.5 |
| | |
Walter R. Burkley, 41 | 2007 | Vice President and Senior Counsel — Fund Business |
Vice President | | Management Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Harold H. La, 37 | 2006 | Vice President — Capital Research Global Investors, |
Vice President | | Capital Research Company5 |
| | |
David M. Riley, 40 | 2004 | Senior Vice President — Capital Research Global |
Vice President | | Investors, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Dylan J. Yolles, 38 | 2006 | Vice President — Capital Research Global Investors, |
Vice President | | Capital Research Company5 |
| | |
Chad L. Norton, 47 | 1991 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Secretary | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
David A. Pritchett, 41 | 1999 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Treasurer | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Steven I. Koszalka, 43 | 2005 | Assistant Vice President — Fund Business |
Assistant Secretary | | Management Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Sheryl F. Johnson, 39 | 1998 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Assistant Treasurer | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| 1Trustees and officers of the fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement. |
| 2Capital Research and Management Company manages the American Funds, consisting of 30 funds. Capital Research and Management Company also manages American Funds Insurance Series,® which is composed of 15 funds and serves as the underlying investment vehicle for certain variable insurance contracts; American Funds Target Date Retirement Series,® Inc., which is composed of nine funds and is available to investors in tax-deferred retirement plans and IRAs; and Endowments, which is composed of two portfolios and is available to certain nonprofit organizations. |
| 3This includes all directorships (other than those in the American Funds) that are held by each trustee as a director of a public company or a registered investment company. |
| 4“Interested persons” within the meaning of the 1940 Act, on the basis of their affiliation with the fund’s investment adviser, Capital Research and Management Company, or affiliated entities (including the fund’s principal underwriter). |
| 5Company affiliated with Capital Research and Management Company. |
Offices
Offices of the fund and of the investment adviser
Capital Research and Management Company
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
6455 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
Transfer agent for shareholder accounts
American Funds Service Company
(Please write to the address nearest you.)
P.O. Box 25065
Santa Ana, CA 92799-5065
P.O. Box 659522
San Antonio, TX 78265-9522
P.O. Box 6007
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6007
P.O. Box 2280
Norfolk, VA 23501-2280
Custodian of assets
State Street Bank and Trust Company
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
Counsel
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP
55 Second Street, Suite 1700
San Francisco, CA 94105
Independent registered public accounting firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
695 Town Center Drive
Suite 1200
Costa Mesa, CA 92626-7188
Principal underwriter
American Funds Distributors, Inc.
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the American Funds. This and other important information is contained in the fund’s prospectus, which can be obtained from your financial professional and should be read carefully before investing. You may also call American Funds Service Company (AFS) at 800/421-0180 or visit the American Funds website at americanfunds.com.
“American Funds Proxy Voting Guidelines” — which describes how we vote proxies relating to portfolio securities — is available free of charge on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) website at sec.gov, on the American Funds website or upon request by calling AFS. The fund files its proxy voting record with the SEC for the 12 months ended June 30 by August 31. The report also is available on the SEC and American Funds websites.
A complete November 30, 2007, portfolio of The New Economy Fund’s investments is available free of charge by calling AFS or visiting the SEC website (where it is part of Form N-CSR).
The New Economy Fund files a complete list of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. This filing is available free of charge on the SEC website. You may also review or, for a fee, copy this filing at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. (800/SEC-0330). Additionally, the list of portfolio holdings also is available by calling AFS.
This report is for the information of shareholders of The New Economy Fund, but it also may be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current prospectus, which gives details about charges, expenses, investment objectives and operating policies of the fund. If used as sales material after March 31, 2008, this report must be accompanied by an American Funds statistical update for the most recently completed calendar quarter.
[logo - American Funds®]
The right choice for the long term®
What makes American Funds different?
For 75 years, we have followed a consistent philosophy to benefit our investors. Our 30 carefully conceived, broadly diversified funds, in addition to the target date retirement series, offer opportunities that have attracted over 40 million shareholder accounts.
Our unique combination of strengths includes these five factors:
| •A long-term, value-oriented approach |
| We seek to buy securities at reasonable prices relative to their prospects and hold them for the long term. |
| •An extensive global research effort |
| Our investment professionals travel the world to find the best investment opportunities and gain a comprehensive understanding of companies and markets. |
| •The multiple portfolio counselor system |
| Our unique method of portfolio management, developed nearly 50 years ago, blends teamwork with individual accountability and has provided American Funds with a sustainable method of achieving fund objectives. |
| •Experienced investment professionals |
| American Funds portfolio counselors have an average of 24 years of investment experience, providing a wealth of knowledge and experience that few organizations have. |
| •A commitment to low operating expenses |
| The American Funds provide exceptional value for shareholders, with operating expenses that are among the lowest in the mutual fund industry. |
American Funds span a range of investment objectives
| Emphasis on long-term growth through stocks |
| The Growth Fund of America® |
| Emphasis on long-term growth and dividends through stocks |
| Capital World Growth and Income FundSM |
| The Investment Company of America® |
| Washington Mutual Investors FundSM |
| Emphasis on above-average income and growth through stocks and/or bonds |
The Income Fund of America®
| Emphasis on long-term growth and current income through stocks and bonds |
| Emphasis on current income through bonds |
| American High-Income TrustSM |
| The Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
| Intermediate Bond Fund of America® |
Short-Term Bond Fund of AmericaSM
| U.S. Government Securities FundSM |
| Emphasis on tax-free current income through municipal bonds |
| American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund® |
| Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
| The Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America® |
| State-specific tax-exempt funds |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of California® |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of Maryland® |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of Virginia® |
| The Cash Management Trust of America® |
| The Tax-Exempt Money Fund of AmericaSM |
| The U.S. Treasury Money Fund of AmericaSM |
| •American Funds Target Date Retirement Series® |
The Capital Group Companies
American Funds Capital Research and Management Capital International Capital Guardian Capital Bank and Trust
Lit. No. MFGEAR-914-0108P
Litho in USA BBC/CG/8064-S10042
Printed on recycled paper
ITEM 2 – Code of Ethics