The right choice for the long term®
The New Economy Fund
Innovation:
What does it mean for investing, and why does it matter?
[photo of a model of a molecule in a person's hand]
Annual report for the year ended November 30, 2009
The New Economy Fund® seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in securities of companies that can benefit from innovation, exploit new technologies or provide products and services that meet the demands of an evolving global economy.
This fund is one of the 30 American Funds. American Funds is one of the nation’s largest mutual fund families. For nearly 80 years, Capital Research and Management Company,SM the American Funds adviser, has invested with a long-term focus based on thorough research and attention to risk.
Fund results shown in this report, unless otherwise indicated, are for Class A shares at net asset value. If a sales charge (maximum 5.75%) had been deducted, the results would have been lower. Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. Investing for short periods makes losses more likely. Investments are not FDIC-insured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity, so they may lose value. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Here are the average annual total returns on a $1,000 investment with all distributions reinvested for periods ended December 31, 2009 (the most recent calendar quarter-end): |
| | | | | | | | | |
Class A shares | | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting 5.75% maximum sales charge | | | 36.81 | % | | | 2.66 | % | | | –0.92 | % |
The total annual fund operating expense ratio was 0.95% for Class A shares as of November 30, 2009.
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. The fund’s investment adviser waived a portion of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. See the Financial Highlights table on pages 27 and 28 for details.
Results for other share classes can be found on page 3.
Equity investments are subject to market fluctuations. Investing outside the United States may be subject to additional risks, such as currency fluctuations and political instability. Global diversification can help reduce these risks. Investing in small-capitalization stocks can involve additional risks. See the prospectus and the Risk Factors section of this report for more information on these and other risks associated with investing in the fund.
In this report |
| |
| Special feature |
| |
6 | Innovation: What does it mean for investing, and why does it matter? |
| |
| |
| Contents |
| |
1 | Letter to shareholders |
| |
4 | The value of a long-term perspective |
| |
12 | Summary investment portfolio |
| |
17 | Financial statements |
| |
34 | Board of trustees and other officers |
Fellow shareholders:
[photo of a model of a molecule]
The New Economy Fund’s fiscal year was one of the most turbulent in its history. When it began in December 2008, we had already witnessed a year of the steepest market declines in decades. While the environment eased a bit in December, renewed worries of financial contagion brought markets to their lowest levels in decades by early March. Looking back, that was the bottom for 2009. In the ensuing months through the end of the fiscal year, the global economy stabilized and stock markets around the world strongly rebounded.
For the year as a whole, The New Economy Fund recorded a total return of 45.9% for its fiscal year ended November 30, 2009. That surpassed the Global Service and Information Index, which rose 31.6%. This unmanaged index tracks companies in those sectors around the world and its results do not include expenses. The fund’s return also outpaced the 40.0% total return of the Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds Index, a measure of 30 growth funds representing a variety of market capitalizations. As you can see in the table below, the fund’s results compare favorably with these indexes over the long term as well.
Portfolio review
During the year, the fund’s investment professionals kept their focus on thoroughly researching individual companies, which helped the fund take positions in companies with attractive valuations and strong or improving fundamentals. Together, banks and diversified financials made up 19.0% of the fund’s assets at the end of the period, up from a combined 9.6% last year. Many of the new holdings were in Europe and Brazil, where stock prices had been beaten down below what we believed was warranted. These industry groups include some of the fund’s largest holdings as well as some of the largest gainers: 10th-largest Banco Santander (+108.3%) and third-largest Banco Bradesco (+95.8%).
The portfolio ended the fiscal year with 17.0% of assets invested in the software and services industry, up from 14.4% last year, which proved very helpful. Software maker Microsoft (+45.5%) was the second-largest holding and Internet search giant Google (+99.0%) was the fourth-largest. Other significant holdings included Chinese Internet services company Tencent Holdings (+235.8%) and Internet portal Yahoo! (+30.1%). The technology hardware and equipment group made up 9.1% of the fund’s assets, including largest holding Apple (+115.7%), Cisco Systems (+41.5%) and Delta Electronics (+46.9%).
[Begin Sidebar]
Results at a glance (for periods ended November 30, 2009, with all distributions reinvested) | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total returns | | | Average annual total returns | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Lifetime | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | | | (since 12/1/83) | |
The New Economy Fund (Class A shares) | | | 45.9 | % | | | 4.0 | % | | | 0.5 | % | | | 10.6 | % |
Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds Index | | | 40.0 | | | | 1.4 | | | | –1.9 | | | | 8.8 | |
Global Service and Information Index*† | | | 31.6 | | | | 0.6 | | | | –1.9 | | | | N/A | |
Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index* | | | 25.4 | | | | 0.7 | | | | –0.6 | | | | 10.3 | |
*Unmanaged. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
† The index is compiled by Capital Research and Management Company, the investment adviser to the fund. | | | | | |
[End Sidebar]
Not all of the fund’s holdings fared well, including the low-fare Irish airline Ryanair Holdings, which was the fifth-largest holding and was flat for the year. Several financials were relative laggards as well, including HSBC Holdings (+8.1%), Wells Fargo (–2.9%) and Bank of New York Mellon (–11.8%). Health care equipment and services, which made up 6.0% of the fund’s assets, was mixed. This includes medical device makers Inverness Medical Innovations (up 139.3% and the eighth-largest holding), Medtronic (+39.1%) and NuVasive (–5.8%).
In total, the fund had 39.2% of its assets invested outside the United States, 54.4% in U.S. companies and the rest in cash and short-term securities. We ended the year with a cash position of 6.4% — down significantly from 13.8% at the beginning of the fiscal year, indicating the opportunities for investment we found during the year.
A look ahead
The New Economy Fund’s investment professionals have freedom to choose from the whole spectrum of market capitalization — small to very large — and to invest up to 45% of the fund’s assets in companies based outside the U.S. This gives the fund pronounced flexibility to look for value in many areas. Recently, the fund expanded its investment universe further, to include companies for which innovation is an important element of their business strategy even if outside the services and information industries. Over time, we have expanded the fund’s investable universe to accommodate the evolution of some industries and sectors, keeping in mind our mission of investing in companies that can prosper from a constantly changing marketplace. The ability to invest in innovative companies across industries will further enhance our investment opportunities. (To learn more about how the fund looks at innovation, please see the feature “Innovation: What does it mean for investing, and why does it matter?” on page 6.)
The stock markets appear to be anticipating continued improvement. Many of the global economies are recovering; developing markets such as China and India have returned to their high-growth paths. However, there is a divergence of economic strength among regions — much of the developed world, the U.S. included, is taking smaller steps to recovery. Clouding the picture in the United States are concerns over federal stimulus packages, changes in interest rates, the direction of the dollar relative to other major currencies, and worries that the large federal deficit and debt levels could keep growth to a minimum or alternatively fuel inflation. While we are guardedly optimistic about the likelihood of a continuing recovery next year, there remain significant risks that we are watching closely. As always, we focus on discovering what we believe are the most promising companies with the potential to thrive in different environments.
We thank you for your continued support and your long-term investment perspective.
Sincerely,
/s/ Timothy D. Armour
Timothy D. Armour
Vice Chairman of the Board
/s/ Claudia P. Huntington
Claudia P. Huntington
President
January 13, 2010
For current information about the fund, visit americanfunds.com.
[Begin Sidebar]
Where the fund’s assets are invested (percent of net assets) | | | |
[begin pie chart]
As of November 30, 2009 | | | |
| | | |
United States | | | 54.4 | % |
Europe | | | 19.8 | |
Asia & Pacific Basin | | | 12.3 | |
Other (including Latin America) | | | 7.1 | |
Short-term securities & other assets less liabilities | | | 6.4 | |
[end pie chart]
[begin pie chart]
As of November 30, 2008 | | | | |
| | | | |
United States | | | 53.6 | % |
Europe | | | 17.6 | |
Asia & Pacific Basin | | | 12.2 | |
Other (including Latin America) | | | 2.8 | |
Short-term securities & other assets less liabilities | | | 13.8 | |
[end pie chart]
[End Sidebar]
Other share class results
Classes B, C, F and 529
Fund results shown are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Average annual total returns for periods ended December 31, 2009 (the most recent calendar quarter-end): | | | | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | Life of class | |
Class B shares1 — first sold 3/15/00 | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting applicable contingent deferred sales charge | | | | | | | | | |
(CDSC), maximum of 5%, payable only if shares | | | | | | | | | |
are sold within six years of purchase | | | 39.07 | % | | | 2.73 | % | | | –1.45 | % |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | 44.07 | | | | 3.09 | | | | –1.45 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C shares — first sold 3/15/01 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting CDSC, maximum of 1%, payable only | | | | | | | | | | | | |
if shares are sold within one year of purchase | | | 43.10 | | | | 3.06 | | | | 2.02 | |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | 44.10 | | | | 3.06 | | | | 2.02 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class F-1 shares2 — first sold 3/15/01 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | | | | | | | | | | | | |
by sponsoring firm | | | 45.16 | | | | 3.87 | | | | 2.83 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class F-2 shares2 — first sold 8/1/08 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | | | | | | | | | | | | |
by sponsoring firm | | | 45.63 | | | | — | | | | 1.36 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-A shares3 — first sold 2/15/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting 5.75% maximum sales charge | | | 36.72 | | | | 2.62 | | | | 4.38 | |
Not reflecting maximum sales charge | | | 45.09 | | | | 3.85 | | | | 5.17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-B shares1,3 — first sold 2/19/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting applicable CDSC, maximum of 5%, payable | | | | | | | | | | | | |
only if shares are sold within six years of purchase | | | 38.95 | | | | 2.62 | | | | 4.56 | |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | 43.95 | | | | 2.98 | | | | 4.56 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-C shares3 — first sold 2/21/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reflecting CDSC, maximum of 1%, payable only | | | | | | | | | | | | |
if shares are sold within one year of purchase | | | 42.94 | | | | 2.98 | | | | 4.75 | |
Not reflecting CDSC | | | 43.94 | | | | 2.98 | | | | 4.75 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-E shares2,3 — first sold 3/15/02 | | | 44.70 | | | | 3.51 | | | | 4.03 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-F-1 shares2,3 — first sold 10/11/02 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Not reflecting annual asset-based fee charged | | | | | | | | | | | | |
by sponsoring firm | | | 45.41 | | | | 4.01 | | | | 10.71 | |
| 1These shares are not available for purchase. |
| 2These shares are sold without any initial or contingent deferred sales charge. |
| 3Results shown do not reflect the $10 account setup fee and an annual $10 account maintenance fee. |
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. The fund’s investment adviser waived a portion of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. See the Financial Highlights table on pages 27 and 28 for details that include expense ratios for all share classes.
For information regarding the differences among the various share classes, refer to the fund’s prospectus.
The value of a long-term perspective
Fund results shown are for Class A shares and reflect deduction of the maximum sales charge of 5.75% on the $10,000 investment.1 Thus, the net amount invested was $9,425.2 Results are for past periods and are not predictive of results for future periods. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those shown. Share prices and returns will vary, so investors may lose money. For current information and month-end results, visit americanfunds.com.
Here’s how a $10,000 investment in The New Economy Fund’s Class A shares grew between December 1, 1983 — when the fund began operations — and November 30, 2009, the end of its latest fiscal year. As you can see, the $10,000 would have increased to $130,728 after deducting the maximum 5.75% sales charge and reinvesting all distributions, an average annual increase of 10.4%. The fund’s year-by-year results appear under the chart.
Average annual total returns based on a $1,000 investment (for periods ended November 30, 2009)* | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Class A shares: | | | | | | | | | |
| | 1 year | | | 5 years | | | 10 years | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | 37.49 | % | | | 2.81 | % | | | –0.14 | % |
*Assumes reinvestment of all distributions and payment of the maximum 5.75% sales charge. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment results assume all distributions are reinvested and reflect applicable fees and expenses. The fund’s investment adviser waived a portion of its management fees from September 1, 2004, through December 31, 2008. Fund results shown reflect the waiver, without which they would have been lower. See the Financial Highlights table on pages 27 and 28 for details.
[begin mountain chart]
| | New Economy Fund1,3 | | | S&P 500 with dividends reinvested3,4 | | | Lipper Multi-Cap Growth Funds Index3,5 | | | Consumer Price Index (inflation)6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
12/1/1983 | | $ | 9,425 | | | $ | 10,000 | | | $ | 10,000 | | | $ | 10,000 | |
11/30/1984 | | | 9,478 | | | | 10,295 | | | | 9,117 | | | | 10,405 | |
11/30/1985 | | | 13,135 | | | | 13,276 | | | | 11,474 | | | | 10,771 | |
11/30/1986 | | | 15,939 | | | | 16,949 | | | | 14,182 | | | | 10,909 | |
11/30/1987 | | | 15,082 | | | | 16,154 | | | | 13,143 | | | | 11,403 | |
11/30/1988 | | | 18,449 | | | | 19,915 | | | | 15,718 | | | | 11,887 | |
11/30/1989 | | | 25,252 | | | | 26,047 | | | | 21,465 | | | | 12,441 | |
11/30/1990 | | | 21,871 | | | | 25,143 | | | | 19,635 | | | | 13,221 | |
11/30/1991 | | | 26,395 | | | | 30,246 | | | | 25,951 | | | | 13,617 | |
11/30/1992 | | | 32,619 | | | | 35,823 | | | | 30,838 | | | | 14,032 | |
11/30/1993 | | | 42,601 | | | | 39,433 | | | | 34,947 | | | | 14,407 | |
11/30/1994 | | | 41,348 | | | | 39,845 | | | | 34,809 | | | | 14,792 | |
11/30/1995 | | | 50,949 | | | | 54,560 | | | | 47,089 | | | | 15,178 | |
11/30/1996 | | | 58,591 | | | | 69,753 | | | | 56,344 | | | | 15,672 | |
11/30/1997 | | | 71,268 | | | | 89,635 | | | | 67,444 | | | | 15,958 | |
11/30/1998 | | | 88,183 | | | | 110,844 | | | | 76,462 | | | | 16,206 | |
11/30/1999 | | | 124,962 | | | | 134,002 | | | | 107,933 | | | | 16,630 | |
11/30/2000 | | | 115,668 | | | | 128,346 | | | | 105,958 | | | | 17,204 | |
11/30/2001 | | | 95,236 | | | | 112,670 | | | | 80,512 | | | | 17,530 | |
11/30/2002 | | | 79,002 | | | | 94,072 | | | | 61,957 | | | | 17,915 | |
11/30/2003 | | | 95,764 | | | | 108,259 | | | | 76,078 | | | | 18,231 | |
11/30/2004 | | | 107,251 | | | | 122,166 | | | | 83,259 | | | | 18,874 | |
11/30/2005 | | | 122,035 | | | | 132,473 | | | | 93,933 | | | | 19,526 | |
11/30/2006 | | | 141,138 | | | | 151,311 | | | | 103,032 | | | | 19,911 | |
11/30/2007 | | | 161,965 | | | | 162,985 | | | | 116,323 | | | | 20,768 | |
11/30/2008 | | | 89,610 | | | | 100,921 | | | | 63,806 | | | | 20,991 | |
11/30/2009 | | | 130,728 | | | | 126,539 | | | | 89,407 | | | | 21,376 | |
[end mountain chart]
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
November 30 | | | ’84 | | | | ’85 | | | | ’86 | | | | ’87 | | | | ’88 | | | | ’89 | | | | ’90 | | | | ’91 | | | | ’92 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
reinvested | | | — | | | $ | 199 | | | | 140 | | | | 367 | | | | 315 | | | | 421 | | | | 565 | | | | 588 | | | | 327 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Value at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
year-end2 | | $ | 9,478 | | | | 13,135 | | | | 15,939 | | | | 15,082 | | | | 18,449 | | | | 25,252 | | | | 21,871 | | | | 26,395 | | | | 32,619 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NEF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return | | | (5.2 | )% | | | 38.6 | | | | 21.3 | | | | (5.4 | ) | | | 22.3 | | | | 36.9 | | | | (13.4 | ) | | | 20.7 | | | | 23.6 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
November 30 | | | ’93 | | | | ’94 | | | | ’95 | | | | ’96 | | | | ’97 | | | | ’98 | | | | ’99 | | | | ’00 | | | | ’01 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
reinvested | | | 189 | | | | 307 | | | | 516 | | | | 578 | | | | 455 | | | | 421 | | | | 540 | | | | 585 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Value at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
year-end2 | | | 42,601 | | | | 41,348 | | | | 50,949 | | | | 58,591 | | | | 71,268 | | | | 88,183 | | | | 124,962 | | | | 115,668 | | | | 95,236 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NEF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return | | | 30.6 | | | | (2.9 | ) | | | 23.2 | | | | 15.0 | | | | 21.6 | | | | 23.7 | | | | 41.7 | | | | (7.4 | ) | | | (17.7 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
November 30 | | | ’02 | | | | ’03 | | | | ’04 | | | | ’05 | | | | ’06 | | | | ’07 | | | | ’08 | | | | ’09 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
reinvested | | | — | | | | — | | | | 58 | | | | 394 | | | | 791 | | | | 1,031 | | | | 1,211 | | | | 1,360 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | �� | | | |
Value at | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
year-end2 | | | 79,002 | | | | 95,764 | | | | 107,251 | | | | 122,035 | | | | 141,138 | | | | 161,965 | | | | 89,610 | | | | 130,728 | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
NEF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total return | | | (17.0 | ) | | | 21.2 | | | | 12.0 | | | | 13.8 | | | | 15.7 | | | | 14.8 | | | | (44.7 | ) | | | 45.9 | | | | | |
Average annual total return for 26 years: 10.4%1
The results shown are before taxes on fund distributions and sale of fund shares.
| 1As outlined in the prospectus, the sales charge is reduced for accounts (and aggregated investments) of $25,000 or more and is eliminated for purchases of $1 million or more. There is no sales charge on dividends or capital gain distributions that are reinvested in additional shares. |
| 2The maximum initial sales charge was 8.5% prior to July 1, 1988. |
| 3All results are calculated with dividends and capital gains reinvested. |
| 4Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index is unmanaged and its results do not reflect the effect of sales charges, commissions or expenses. |
| 5This index tracks 30 U.S. growth funds representing a variety of market capitalizations. Results reflect fund expenses but do not reflect any applicable front-end sales charges. If any applicable front-end sales charges were included results of the index would be lower. |
| 6Computed from data supplied by the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. |
Innovation:
What does it mean for investing, and why does it matter?
[photo of the outside of an office building - people working inside]
Innovation. The word means different things to different people but most would agree it involves finding a useful new way of doing things. For The New Economy Fund’s investment analysts, innovation is an important metric in their equity research process. What does it mean for investing, and why does it matter?
“The way a company manages innovation is one of the things we look at very closely,” says Claudia Huntington, a portfolio counselor and the president of the fund. “In certain companies and industries, we think innovation plays an important role in determining whether an investment can succeed in the long run. Its value is often not apparent, but if it’s there, even mundane businesses can be quite attractive growth investments.”
There are few businesses that can survive for long without some kind of innovation. In a world of increasing competition and lightning-fast technological advances, companies need to continually adapt. Good companies have the ability to innovate to attract new customers, develop new market channels, create supply-chain efficiencies, improve technologies and to simply make better products.
“Innovation is often the source of growth for a company,” says Tim Armour, a portfolio counselor and the vice chairman of the board of The New Economy Fund. “The innovation engine is fundamental to many companies’ ability to grow over the long term.”
Examples can range from the mundane to the hyper-cool. The iPod and iPhone by Apple are without a doubt examples of innovation. “Apple captured the high end of the cell phone market purely on innovation; it hadn’t even been participating in the handset market,” Tim says. “These kinds of changes — which come from big companies as well as small ones — can be remarkable.” Innovative thinking is well-known in the technology arena but is found in all industries. “Innovation can often have the most profound impact on established businesses, though many people think of innovation as the primary factor behind start-ups,” he adds.
Innovation is not the only metric that investment professionals on The New Economy Fund examine, of course. Other important characteristics include the quality of management and how it allocates the company’s available resources, the strength of the balance sheet, and whether the company has an optimal capital structure (the right balance between debt and equity funding to favor the best return to shareholders).
[Begin Pull Quote]
[photo of dna on a sheet of clear sheet in a person's hands]
“The way a company manages innovation is one of the things we look at very closely.”
— Claudia Huntington
[End Pull Quote]
New strategies
We are all familiar with The Big Thing — an earth-shattering innovation that changes the way the world works, such as the steam engine, the telephone or the Internet — but these are the rare innovations. Although many envision innovation in the context of research and development (R&D) labs, with engineers and scientists busy developing the next new technology, innovation at its core is often simply discovering a new or better strategy.
Good businesses are continually evolving their models, innovating in response to changes in consumer tastes and demands, pressures in their markets and competitors’ actions. They look for new opportunities to create something better to differentiate themselves. Often these innovations make a company only slightly better — but that’s enough to give them an edge over the competition. These are the types of innovations that allow a business to be more efficient, to be the low-cost producer, or to be that much more attractive to the consumer.
“There are some businesses that have been around for a long time — we even could have called them ‘stodgy’ — but they morphed into new things,” Claudia says. Monsanto, a long-time chemical firm that has renewed itself through a focus on biotech strategies for seed production, is an example. As revenues from top-selling weed control products waned, it developed new seed production areas and reinvigorated the company.
Corning, a global industrial manufacturer, developed and patented glass substrates for liquid crystal displays (LCDs) many years ago. “Its manufacturing innovations have given the company a competitive advantage, long after its patents expired,” says Ken Kojima, an investment analyst for the fund. “It developed many best practices — heavily guarded manufacturing processes — that allowed it to keep more than half the market share of this fast-growing area.”
Some companies have lost out by failing to innovate around their strengths but rather focused their efforts on looking for the next new groundbreaking product. So the use of small innovations to protect a product can be key to unlocking value. “I look for companies that can take their advantage and keep it,” investment analyst Kaitlyn Murphy says. “A great product — nylon, for example — can be rapidly commoditized if a company does not continually and incrementally extend that product to new areas.”
Different paths
With mature companies, innovation also can show up in the internal processes they use to provide services or make products. For instance, a manufacturing facility may innovate through reorganizing its supply chain, or a services company may utilize more or better technology to improve the productivity of its employees. These are innovations that customers often are not aware of, but can become apparent through lower prices or higher quality.
Smaller companies face different challenges. Many start off with one product that meets a market need, and they can become successful in that niche. However, once they saturate a market, they need to broaden their offerings in order to grow. “This is where small-cap companies face their greatest challenge,” says investment analyst Alex Nicolaou. “As the innovation curve flattens and big leaps in technological improvement slow, competition rises, and companies must turn inward and ‘innovate’ themselves and their operations. Those that do it best can make simple changes that have dramatic effects throughout the organization.”
[Begin Sidebar]
[photo of a floor of an office building]
A global innovation ranking
The following is the 2009 list of countries ranked by the International Innovation Index:
Rank | | Country | | Overall | |
| | | | | |
| 1 | | Singapore | | | 2.45 | |
| 2 | | South Korea | | | 2.26 | |
| 3 | | Switzerland | | | 2.23 | |
| 4 | | Iceland | | | 2.17 | |
| 5 | | Ireland | | | 1.88 | |
| 6 | | Hong Kong | | | 1.88 | |
| 7 | | Finland | | | 1.87 | |
| 8 | | United States | | | 1.80 | |
| 9 | | Japan | | | 1.79 | |
| 10 | | Sweden | | | 1.64 | |
Companies innovate by leveraging both new business models and improved technologies. This can involve changes in the way a manufacturing facility organizes its work, or in how marketing communicates with the company’s customers or in the politics that support innovation. There is a burgeoning field of research called “innovation economics,” which studies the underpinnings of successful innovation strategies. A new index for ranking countries, called the BCG/NAM/MI International Innovation Index, is produced by The Boston Consulting Group (BCG), the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) and The Manufacturing Institute (MI). In the 2009 International Innovation Index ranking, the United States came in eighth in innovation leadership out of 110 countries. Singapore was first, followed by South Korea and Switzerland.
The index reflects a broad research study that looks at essentially two factors: the business repercussions of innovation and governments’ ability to encourage innovation through public policy. The study is based on a survey of more than 1,000 executives from manufacturers across all industries, personal interviews with some of the executives, and a comparison of “innovation friendliness” measures among the countries. The study measured government, education and fiscal policy; patent data; technology transfer; business performance measures such as labor productivity and total shareholder returns; and innovation’s effect on business migration and economic growth.
Idea generation, structured processes, leadership and skilled workers are the factors that enable innovation success, according to the report, and must be supported by effective government policies.
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Pull Quote]
“As the innovation curve flattens and big leaps in technological improvement slow, competition rises, and companies must turn inward and ‘innovate’ themselves and their operations.”
— Alex Nicolaou
[End Pull Quote]
Some companies are able to innovate their own businesses using existing technology. For example, banking, retailing and many other consumer-centered businesses use the Internet to better reach their customers and sell their products. Distribution business MSC Industrial Direct is an example of a company that has creatively leveraged the opportunities of the Internet. “The company uses the Internet as a front-end marketing tool for the fulfillment order processing of industrial goods,” says James Bray, an investment analyst for the fund. “By using technology, MSC helps its customers manage inventory more efficiently at a lower total cost.”
Companies can blend new digital technologies and conventional systems to test out innovative ideas. For instance, clothing retailer Inditex uses advanced information systems to analyze real-time data from its Zara brand stores. It uses that demand information to send fashions to the right locations, making the ordering and restocking process more agile. Systems that track everything from cash register purchases to how products move through the supply chain can give businesses the ability to cheaply collect data, further supporting innovation.
Original combinations
Sometimes innovation comes from combining strengths from different areas within a company or creating unusual combinations among products. “Best Buy, an electronics retailer, came up with the Geek Squad concept, which brought together the company’s products and their customers’ need for help using those products,” Claudia says. “The existence of Geek Squad helps separate the company from its competitors.”
Another example of an innovative combination of offerings is a company in the oil field services business. Schlumberger, a provider of a range of exploration and production services and products to the oil and gas industry, realized a competitive advantage through bundling. It brought its proprietary geophysical expertise together with its oil well service business, which allowed its clients to be more productive in getting oil out of the ground. “It married its oil reservoir geoscience knowledge with its other business to create a differentiated product that other companies could not offer,” says Barry Crosthwaite, an investment analyst on the fund. “It could help its customers and thus grow sales faster by bundling its unique offering with its related services. When a company innovates to offer products in a unique way that competitors can’t follow, it can do well for as long as it can maintain that advantage.”
Alex points out an example in the medical device industry. A company called Masimo, which makes equipment to measure blood oxygen levels noninvasively by using tiny lightwaves, was started by an engineer who created new ways to increase detection rates, reduce errors and enable doctors to gauge several other blood parameters in addition to oxygen levels. Masimo has patented much of the intellectual property for the devices and has earned a large share of the market. But the new technology is not the only example of innovation. “Its intellectual property is important, but even more important is its ability to innovate and make adjustments to its core technology to expand into new markets,” Alex says. “It maintains a strong culture that is focused on innovation.”
Culture of innovation
In researching a company, analysts often try to understand how management looks at innovation because companies can foster this in different ways. “We look at the people leading the innovation and make judgments on whether they’re effective,” Claudia says. “We watch them over time and see how they motivate their people to be creative.”
Companies have different kinds of incentive systems to encourage innovation, and this can be seen in how each company manages its culture. “It wasn’t until I had the opportunity to visit hundreds of small companies that I realized the difference a strong culture can make,” Alex says. “I look for a ‘platform,’ that is, a strong culture that is consistent and well-understood by employees but that can evolve as the company grows.”
Internet giant Google, which pioneered ways to monetize Internet searches, has a famously innovative culture that remains consciously cultivated. Employees are encouraged to propose different and ambitious ideas, and failure is not a stigma. For example, engineers can spend 20% of their time on their own ideas. Many of the projects have yielded success and others not, but it is one way the company cultivates its culture of innovation.
This company attitude can be very beneficial on several levels. “Sometimes companies, even big companies, get lazy; over time, it can make them vulnerable to smaller, more aggressive competitors,” says Alex. “Managements can be innovative simply by identifying their own weaknesses and filling the gaps.”
Measuring innovation
A company needs innovation to help it grow consistently and profitably. “A company can manage innovation in many different ways — it is not a ‘one size fits all’ component,” Claudia says. Because of that, there are several metrics for gauging innovation, for determining how well a company can refine and tweak the business. Investment professionals on the fund look at how much a company spends on R&D and how efficiently it succeeds in those efforts, including the rate of new product introduction relative to the industry rates.
“One thing I look for to measure innovation is a sustainable R&D advantage,” Barry says. “In researching companies, we want to see those that can take advantage of scale and profitability and plow that money back into R&D to retain their advantages.” He adds that analyzing relative spending across companies in an industry can give indications about future success.
Pivotal too is how a company protects its intellectual property, which is perhaps just as important as the development of those innovations. Success in any field can bring imitators, so having protectable patents is important when making an equity investment. “This could be called ‘legal innovation’ — having a good team of patent attorneys and engineers looking out three to five years and trying to understand what could happen,” Alex says. “That is just as important as the benchwork R&D taking place today.”
Looking at innovation systematically gives clues into a company. There is no one metric or ratio to look at in determining whether a company is innovative, however, and each company is researched thoroughly on many levels before any investment decision is made. “The point is that innovation isn’t just about looking at a product and making one change to make it better,” Alex says. “Getting a product right is just the first stage — a company must then remain innovative to inspire the entire organization with the same underlying vision.” n
[Begin Sidebar]
[photo of a model of a molecule]
Our organization manages equity assets through separate divisions that make independent investment decisions.
[End Sidebar]
[Begin Sidebar]
The New Economy Fund evolves
At various times in its 26-year history, The New Economy Fund has expanded the scope of its investment universe. The fund began by targeting the fast-growing services and information sectors, and as global economies evolved over time, the fund incorporated other aspects of the investment universe to accommodate the changing landscape. To ensure its mission is broad and flexible enough to take advantage of an evolving world, the fund recently broadened its strategy to include companies that can benefit from applying innovation and technology to their businesses.
The fund was founded in December 1983, when the U.S. economy was experiencing a profound shift from a predominantly manufacturing-based economy to a services-based one. At the time, “new economy” referred to the expanding services and information industries. That was more than a decade before the phrase was popularized and later discredited by inflated optimism about the Internet in the late 1990s. As the world has changed, the definition of “new economy” has changed as well. Given the increasing dynamism of the global economy, the new policy will permit investments in any company, regardless of sector, as long as the fund’s investment professionals determine that company has the ability to innovate and thrive in the “new economy” no matter what that may be in the future.
The fund has, at different points over the years, enlarged its investment universe to incorporate the world’s shifting economic patterns. As investment opportunities grew outside the United States, the fund’s board of directors raised the original 25% limit in non-U.S.-based companies to its current 45%. In 1997, the fund allowed investments in all technology companies even if their business had a significant manufacturing component. The fund’s investment adviser deemed pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device businesses as appropriate investments for the fund, believing there was real value in their new-product development and research capabilities, along with their significant intellectual property. These situations illustrate the inherent difficulty in articulating a precise formula for which companies will benefit and grow in different environments. With its new approach, we believe The New Economy Fund will be better positioned to benefit from an ever-changing global economy.
[End Sidebar]
Summary investment portfolio, November 30, 2009
Notes to financial statements
1. Organization and significant accounting policies
Organization – The New Economy Fund (the “fund”) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end, diversified management investment company. The fund seeks long-term growth of capital by investing in securities of companies that can benefit from innovation, exploit new technologies or provide products and services that meet the demands of an evolving global economy. Current income is a secondary consideration.
On November 24, 2009, shareholders approved a proposal to reorganize the fund from a Maryland corporation to a Delaware statutory trust. The reorganization is expected to be completed in 2010; however, the fund reserves the right to delay the implementation. Shareholders also approved amendments to the fund’s Investment Advisory and Service Agreement and amendments to and elimination of certain fundamental investment policies of the fund.
The fund has 16 share classes consisting of five retail share classes, five 529 college savings plan share classes and six retirement plan share classes. The 529 college savings plan share classes (529-A, 529-B, 529-C, 529-E and 529-F-1) can be used to save for college education. The six retirement plan share classes (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5 and R-6) are generally offered only through eligible employer-sponsored retirement plans. The fund’s share classes are described below:
Share class | Initial sales charge | Contingent deferred sales charge upon redemption | Conversion feature |
Classes A and 529-A | Up to 5.75% | None (except 1% for certain redemptions within one year of purchase without an initial sales charge) | None |
Classes B and 529-B* | None | Declines from 5% to 0% for redemptions within six years of purchase | Classes B and 529-B convert to Classes A and 529-A, respectively, after eight years |
Class C | None | 1% for redemptions within one year of purchase | Class C converts to Class F-1 after 10 years |
Class 529-C | None | 1% for redemptions within one year of purchase | None |
Class 529-E | None | None | None |
Classes F-1, F-2 and 529-F-1 | None | None | None |
Classes R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, R-5 and R-6 | None | None | None |
*Effective April 21, 2009, Class B and 529-B shares of the fund are not available for purchase.
On May 1, 2009, the fund made an additional retirement plan share class (Class R-6) available for sale pursuant to an amendment to its registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Refer to the fund’s retirement plan prospectus for more details.
Holders of all share classes have equal pro rata rights to assets, dividends and liquidation proceeds. Each share class has identical voting rights, except for the exclusive right to vote on matters affecting only its class. Share classes have different fees and expenses ("class-specific fees and expenses"), primarily due to different arrangements for distribution, administrative and shareholder services. Differences in class-specific fees and expenses will result in differences in net investment income and, therefore, the payment of different per-share dividends by each class.
Significant accounting policies – The financial statements have been prepared to comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies followed by the fund:
Net asset value – The fund generally determines its net asset value as of approximately 4:00 p.m. New York time each day the New York Stock Exchange is open.
Security valuation – Equity securities are valued at the official closing price of, or the last reported sale price on, the exchange or market on which such securities are traded, as of the close of business on the day the securities are being valued or, lacking any sales, at the last available bid price. Prices for each security are taken from the principal exchange or market in which the security trades. Fixed-income securities, including short-term securities purchased with more than 60 days left to maturity, are valued at prices obtained from one or more independent pricing vendors when such prices are available. However, where the investment adviser deems it appropriate to do so, such securities will be valued in good faith at the mean quoted bid and asked prices that are reasonably and timely available (or bid prices, if asked prices are not available) or at prices for securities of comparable maturity, quality and type. Vendors base bond prices on, among other things, valuation matrices that incorporate dealer-supplied valuations, proprietary pricing models and evaluations of the yield curve as of approximately 3:00 p.m. New York time. Securities with both fixed-income and equity characteristics, or equity securities traded principally among fixed-income dealers, are valued in the manner described above for either equity or fixed-income securities, depending on which method is deemed most appropriate by the investment adviser. Short-term securities purchased within 60 days to maturity are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The value of short-term securities originally purchased with maturities greater than 60 days is determined based on an amortized value to par when they reach 60 days or less remaining to maturity.
Securities and other assets for which representative market quotations are not readily available or are considered unreliable by the investment adviser are fair valued as determined in good faith under guidelines adopted by authority of the fund's board of trustees. Market quotations may be considered unreliable if events occur that materially affect the value of securities (particularly securities outside the U.S.) between the close of trading in those securities and the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Various factors may be reviewed in order to make a good faith determination of a security’s fair value. These factors include, but are not limited to, the type and cost of the security; contractual or legal restrictions on resale of the security; relevant financial or business developments of the issuer; actively traded similar or related securities; conversion or exchange rights on the security; related corporate actions; significant events occurring after the close of trading in the security; and changes in overall market conditions. Fair valuations and valuations of investments that are not actively trading involve judgment and may differ materially from valuations that would have been used had greater market activity occurred.
Security transactions and related investment income – Security transactions are recorded by the fund as of the date the trades are executed with brokers. Realized gains and losses from security transactions are determined based on the specific identified cost of the securities. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date and interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Market discounts, premiums and original issue discounts on fixed-income securities are amortized daily over the expected life of the security.
Class allocations – Income, fees and expenses (other than class-specific fees and expenses) and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily among the various share classes based on their relative net assets. Class-specific fees and expenses, such as distribution, administrative and shareholder services, are charged directly to the respective share class.
Dividends and distributions to shareholders – Dividends and distributions paid to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Currency translation – Assets and liabilities, including investment securities, denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect on the valuation date. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates on the dates of such transactions. On the accompanying financial statements, the effects of changes in exchange rates on investment securities are included with the net realized gain or loss and net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments. The realized gain or loss and unrealized appreciation or depreciation resulting from all other transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars are disclosed separately.
2. Risk factors
Investing in the fund may involve certain risks including, but not limited to, those described below.
The prices of the common stocks and other securities held by the fund may decline in response to certain events taking place around the world, including those directly involving the issuers whose securities are owned by the fund; conditions affecting the general economy; overall market changes; local, regional or global political, social or economic instability; governmental or governmental agency responses to economic conditions; and currency, interest rate and commodity price fluctuations. The growth-oriented common stocks and other equity-type securities, such as preferred stocks, convertible preferred stocks and convertible bonds, generally purchased by the fund may involve large price swings and potential for loss, particularly in the case of smaller capitalization stocks.
Investments in securities issued by entities based outside the U.S. may be subject to the risks described above to a greater extent. These investments may also be affected by currency controls; different accounting, auditing, financial reporting, disclosure and regulatory and legal standards and practices; expropriation; changes in tax policy; greater market volatility; different securities market structures; higher transaction costs; and various administrative difficulties, such as delays in clearing and settling portfolio transactions or in receiving payment of dividends. These risks may be heightened in connection with investments in developing countries. Investments in securities issued by entities domiciled in the U.S. may also be subject to many of these risks.
3. Taxation and distributions
Federal income taxation – The fund complies with the requirements under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to mutual funds and intends to distribute substantially all of its net taxable income and net capital gains each year. The fund is not subject to income taxes to the extent such distributions are made. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required.
As of and during the period ended November 30, 2009, the fund did not have a liability for any unrecognized tax benefits. The fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the statement of operations. During the period, the fund did not incur any interest or penalties.
The fund is not subject to examination by U.S. federal tax authorities for tax years before 2005, by state tax authorities for tax years before 2004 and by tax authorities outside the U.S. for tax years before 2004.
Non-U.S. taxation – Dividend and interest income is recorded net of non-U.S. taxes paid. Gains realized by the fund on the sale of securities in certain countries are subject to non-U.S. taxes. The fund records a liability based on unrealized gains to provide for potential non-U.S. taxes payable upon the sale of these securities.
Distributions – Distributions paid to shareholders are based on net investment income and net realized gains determined on a tax basis, which may differ from net investment income and net realized gains for financial reporting purposes. These differences are due primarily to different treatment for items such as currency gains and losses;
short-term capital gains and losses; net capital losses; and non-U.S. taxes on capital gains. The fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the year in which the net investment income and net realized gains are recorded by the fund for financial reporting purposes.
During the year ended November 30, 2009, the fund reclassified $1,484,000 from undistributed net investment income to accumulated net realized loss and reclassified $104,000 from undistributed net investment income to capital paid in on shares of beneficial interest to align financial reporting with tax reporting.
As of November 30, 2009, the tax basis components of distributable earnings, unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and cost of investment securities were as follows:
| | (dollars in thousands) | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | | | | $ | 34,836 | |
Post-October currency loss deferrals (realized during the period November 1, 2009, through November 30, 2009)* | | | | | | (143 | ) |
Capital loss carryforwards†: | | | | | | | |
Expiring 2016 | | $ | (126,200 | ) | | | | |
Expiring 2017 | | | (738,590 | ) | | | (864,790 | ) |
Post-October capital loss deferrals (realized during the period November 1, 2009, through November 30, 2009)* | | | | | | | (1,276 | ) |
Gross unrealized appreciation on investment securities | | | | | | | 1,254,740 | |
Gross unrealized depreciation on investment securities | | | | | | | (498,749 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation on investment securities | | | | | | | 755,991 | |
Cost of investment securities | | | | | | | 6,365,708 | |
*These deferrals are considered incurred in the subsequent year. | | | | | | | | |
†The capital loss carryforwards will be used to offset any capital gains realized by the fund in future years through the expiration dates. The fund will not make distributions from capital gains while capital loss carryforwards remain. |
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders was as follows (dollars in thousands):
| | Year ended November 30, 2009 | | | Year ended November 30, 2008 | |
| | Ordinary income | | | Long-term capital gains | | | Total distributions paid | | | Ordinary income | | | Long-term capital gains | | | Total distributions paid | |
Share class | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 63,512 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 63,512 | | | $ | 62,674 | | | $ | 655,990 | | | $ | 718,664 | |
Class B | | | 172 | | | | - | | | | 172 | | | | 314 | | | | 19,110 | | | | 19,424 | |
Class C | | | 496 | | | | - | | | | 496 | | | | 512 | | | | 17,933 | | | | 18,445 | |
Class F-1 | | | 791 | | | | - | | | | 791 | | | | 4,219 | | | | 41,040 | | | | 45,259 | |
Class F-2* | | | 49 | | | | - | | | | 49 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Class 529-A | | | 1,067 | | | | - | | | | 1,067 | | | | 823 | | | | 8,748 | | | | 9,571 | |
Class 529-B | | | 33 | | | | - | | | | 33 | | | | 13 | | | | 1,391 | | | | 1,404 | |
Class 529-C | | | 89 | | | | - | | | | 89 | | | | 58 | | | | 3,026 | | | | 3,084 | |
Class 529-E | | | 43 | | | | - | | | | 43 | | | | 30 | | | | 473 | | | | 503 | |
Class 529-F-1 | | | 50 | | | | - | | | | 50 | | | | 33 | | | | 287 | | | | 320 | |
Class R-1 | | | 43 | | | | - | | | | 43 | | | | 40 | | | | 1,236 | | | | 1,276 | |
Class R-2 | | | 260 | | | | - | | | | 260 | | | | 174 | | | | 9,238 | | | | 9,412 | |
Class R-3 | | | 879 | | | | - | | | | 879 | | | | 648 | | | | 9,752 | | | | 10,400 | |
Class R-4 | | | 813 | | | | - | | | | 813 | | | | 592 | | | | 5,844 | | | | 6,436 | |
Class R-5 | | | 3,238 | | | | - | | | | 3,238 | | | | 1,863 | | | | 14,563 | | | | 16,426 | |
Class R-6† | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
Total | | $ | 71,535 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 71,535 | | | $ | 71,993 | | | $ | 788,631 | | | $ | 860,624 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
*Class F-2 was offered beginning August 1, 2008. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
†Class R-6 was offered beginning May 1, 2009. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4. Fees and transactions with related parties
Capital Research and Management Company ("CRMC"), the fund’s investment adviser, is the parent company of American Funds Distributors,® Inc. ("AFD"), the principal underwriter of the fund’s shares, and American Funds Service Company® ("AFS"), the fund’s transfer agent.
Investment advisory services - The Investment Advisory and Service Agreement with CRMC provides for monthly fees accrued daily. These fees are based on a declining series of annual rates beginning with 0.580% on the first $500 million of daily net assets and decreasing to 0.345% on such assets in excess of $27 billion. CRMC waived a portion of its investment advisory services fee commencing on September 1, 2004, and terminating on December 31, 2008. During the year ended November 30, 2009, total investment advisory services fees waived by CRMC were $182,000. As a result, the fee shown on the accompanying financial statements of $24,479,000, which was equivalent to an annualized rate of 0.418%, was reduced to $24,297,000, or 0.415% of average daily net assets.
Class-specific fees and expenses – Expenses that are specific to individual share classes are accrued directly to the respective share class. The principal class-specific fees and expenses are described below:
Distribution services – The fund has adopted plans of distribution for all share classes, except Classes F-2, R-5 and R-6. Under the plans, the board of trustees approves certain categories of expenses that are used to finance activities primarily intended to sell fund shares and service existing accounts. The plans provide for payments, based on an annualized percentage of average daily net assets, ranging from 0.25% to 1.00% as noted below. In some cases, the board of trustees has limited the amounts that may be paid to less than the maximum allowed by the plans. All share classes with a plan may use up to 0.25% of average daily net assets to pay service fees, or to compensate AFD for paying service fees, to firms that have entered into agreements with AFD to provide certain shareholder services. The remaining amounts available to be paid under each plan are paid to dealers to compensate them for their sales activities.
For Classes A and 529-A, the board of trustees has also approved the reimbursement of dealer and wholesaler commissions paid by AFD for certain shares sold without a sales charge. These classes reimburse AFD for amounts billed within the prior 15 months but only to the extent that the overall annual expense limit of 0.25% is not exceeded. As of November 30, 2009, there were no unreimbursed expenses subject to reimbursement for Classes A or 529-A.
Share class | Currently approved limits | Plan limits |
Class A | 0.25% | 0.25% |
Class 529-A | 0.25 | 0.50 |
Classes B and 529-B | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Classes C, 529-C and R-1 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Class R-2 | 0.75 | 1.00 |
Classes 529-E and R-3 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
Classes F-1, 529-F-1 and R-4 | 0.25 | 0.50 |
Transfer agent services – The fund has a transfer agent agreement with AFS for Classes A and B. Under this agreement, these share classes compensate AFS for transfer agent services including shareholder recordkeeping, communications and transaction processing. AFS is also compensated for certain transfer agent services provided to all other share classes from the administrative services fees paid to CRMC as described below.
Administrative services – The fund has an administrative services agreement with CRMC to provide transfer agent and other related shareholder services for all share classes other than Classes A and B. Each relevant share class pays CRMC annual fees up to 0.15% (0.10% for Class R-5 and 0.05% for Class R-6) based on its respective average daily net assets. Each relevant share class also pays AFS additional amounts for certain transfer agent services. CRMC and AFS may use these fees to compensate third parties for performing these services. Each 529 share class is subject to an additional administrative services fee payable to the Commonwealth of Virginia for the maintenance of the 529 college savings plan. The quarterly fee is based on a declining series of annual rates beginning with 0.10% on the first $30 billion of the net assets invested in Class 529 shares of the American Funds and decreasing to 0.06% on such assets between $120 billion and $150 billion. The fee for any given calendar quarter is accrued and calculated on the basis of the average net assets of Class 529 shares of the American Funds for the last month of the prior calendar quarter. Although these amounts are included with administrative services fees on the accompanying financial statements, the Commonwealth of Virginia is not considered a related party.
Expenses under the agreements described above for the year ended November 30, 2009, were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Share class | Distribution services | Transfer agent services | Administrative services |
CRMC administrative services | Transfer agent services | Commonwealth of Virginia administrative services |
Class A | $11,118 | $10,419 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Class B | 1,051 | 231 | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
Class C | 1,392 | Included in administrative services | $209 | $55 | Not applicable |
Class F-1 | 334 | 199 | 44 | Not applicable |
Class F-2 | Not applicable | 23 | 2 | Not applicable |
Class 529-A | 170 | 125 | 25 | $86 |
Class 529-B | 116 | 17 | 6 | 12 |
Class 529-C | 281 | 41 | 14 | 28 |
Class 529-E | 23 | 7 | 1 | 5 |
Class 529-F-1 | - | 6 | 1 | 4 |
Class R-1 | 118 | 15 | 7 | Not applicable |
Class R-2 | 650 | 130 | 360 | Not applicable |
Class R-3 | 491 | 146 | 104 | Not applicable |
Class R-4 | 164 | 98 | 8 | Not applicable |
Class R-5 | Not applicable | 154 | 2 | Not applicable |
Class R-6* | Not applicable | 37 | -† | Not applicable |
Total | $15,908 | $10,650 | $1,207 | $629 | $135 |
*Class R-6 was offered beginning May 1, 2009.
† Amount less than one thousand.
Trustees’ deferred compensation – Since the adoption of the deferred compensation plan in 1993, trustees who are unaffiliated with CRMC may elect to defer the cash payment of part or all of their compensation. These deferred amounts, which remain as liabilities of the fund, are treated as if invested in shares of the fund or other American Funds. These amounts represent general, unsecured liabilities of the fund and vary according to the total returns of the selected funds. Trustees’ compensation of $785,000, shown on the accompanying financial statements, includes $512,000 in current fees (either paid in cash or deferred) and a net increase of $273,000 in the value of the deferred amounts.
Affiliated officers and trustees – Officers and certain trustees of the fund are or may be considered to be affiliated with CRMC, AFS and AFD. No affiliated officers or trustees received any compensation directly from the fund.
6. Disclosure of fair value measurements
The fund classifies its assets and liabilities into three levels based on the method used to value the assets or liabilities. Level 1 values are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical securities. Level 2 values are based on significant observable market inputs, such as quoted prices for similar securities and quoted prices in inactive markets. Level 3 values are based on significant unobservable inputs that reflect the fund’s determination of assumptions that market participants might reasonably use in valuing the securities. The valuation levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with the underlying investment. For example, U.S. government securities are generally high-quality and liquid; however, they are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market. The following table presents the fund’s valuation levels as of November 30, 2009 (dollars in thousands):
Investment securities: | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Common stocks: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Software & services | | $ | 1,204,685 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,204,685 | |
Banks | | | 803,636 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 803,636 | |
Technology hardware & equipment | | | 643,112 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 643,112 | |
Diversified financials | | | 546,398 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 546,398 | |
Health care equipment & services | | | 424,761 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 424,761 | |
Pharmaceuticals, biotechnology & life sciences | | | 363,962 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 363,962 | |
Retailing | | | 353,836 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 353,836 | |
Transportation | | | 333,883 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 333,883 | |
Telecommunication services | | | 314,816 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 314,816 | |
Commercial & professional services | | | 235,297 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 235,297 | |
Energy | | | 216,822 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 216,822 | |
Media | | | 163,070 | | | | - | | | | 5,232 | | | | 168,302 | |
Insurance | | | 159,916 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 159,916 | |
Semiconductors & semiconductor equipment | | | 117,257 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 117,257 | |
Utilities | | | 92,096 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 92,096 | |
Consumer services | | | 85,041 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 85,041 | |
Capital goods | | | 65,435 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 65,435 | |
Other | | | 120,722 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 120,722 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 341,828 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 341,828 | |
Convertible securities | | | 952 | | | | 34,527 | | | | - | | | | 35,479 | |
Bonds & notes | | | - | | | | 14,882 | | | | - | | | | 14,882 | |
Short-term securities | | | - | | | | 479,533 | | | | - | | | | 479,533 | |
Total | | $ | 6,587,525 | | | $ | 528,942 | | | $ | 5,232 | | | $ | 7,121,699 | |
The following table reconciles the valuation of the fund's Level 3 investment securities and related transactions for the year ended November 30, 2009 (dollars in thousands): | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning value at 12/1/2008 | | | Net purchases | | | Net unrealized depreciation (*) | | | Net transfers out of Level 3 | | | Ending value at 11/30/2009 | |
Investment securities | | $ | 6,593 | | | $ | 33,750 | | | $ | (21,871 | ) | | $ | (13,240 | ) | | $ | 5,232 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation during the period on Level 3 investment securities held at November 30, 2009 (dollars in thousands) (*): | | | $ | (1,362 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
*Net unrealized depreciation is included in the related amounts on investments in the statement of operations. | |
7. Capital share transactions
Capital share transactions in the fund were as follows (dollars and shares in thousands):
Share class | | Sales(1) | | | Reinvestments of dividends and distributions | | | Repurchases(1) | | | Net (decrease) increase | |
| | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | |
Year ended November 30, 2009 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 731,159 | | | | 40,531 | | | $ | 60,575 | | | | 4,001 | | | $ | (1,045,409 | ) | | | (60,724 | ) | | $ | (253,675 | ) | | | (16,192 | ) |
Class B | | | 18,436 | | | | 1,075 | | | | 167 | | | | 11 | | | | (40,314 | ) | | | (2,412 | ) | | | (21,711 | ) | | | (1,326 | ) |
Class C | | | 57,146 | | | | 3,267 | | | | 478 | | | | 33 | | | | (39,225 | ) | | | (2,428 | ) | | | 18,399 | | | | 872 | |
Class F-1 | | | 106,969 | | | | 5,619 | | | | 688 | | | | 45 | | | | (155,000 | ) | | | (9,610 | ) | | | (47,343 | ) | | | (3,946 | ) |
Class F-2 | | | 50,580 | | | | 2,614 | | | | 39 | | | | 3 | | | | (6,165 | ) | | | (329 | ) | | | 44,454 | | | | 2,288 | |
Class 529-A | | | 19,211 | | | | 1,052 | | | | 1,067 | | | | 71 | | | | (10,441 | ) | | | (596 | ) | | | 9,837 | | | | 527 | |
Class 529-B | | | 1,367 | | | | 78 | | | | 33 | | | | 2 | | | | (1,182 | ) | | | (68 | ) | | | 218 | | | | 12 | |
Class 529-C | | | 7,561 | | | | 421 | | | | 89 | | | | 6 | | | | (4,500 | ) | | | (265 | ) | | | 3,150 | | | | 162 | |
Class 529-E | | | 1,260 | | | | 71 | | | | 43 | | | | 3 | | | | (794 | ) | | | (47 | ) | | | 509 | | | | 27 | |
Class 529-F-1 | | | 2,606 | | | | 141 | | | | 49 | | | | 3 | | | | (702 | ) | | | (41 | ) | | | 1,953 | | | | 103 | |
Class R-1 | | | 5,237 | | | | 290 | | | | 43 | | | | 3 | | | | (3,297 | ) | | | (197 | ) | | | 1,983 | | | | 96 | |
Class R-2 | | | 32,254 | | | | 1,873 | | | | 260 | | | | 17 | | | | (24,662 | ) | | | (1,422 | ) | | | 7,852 | | | | 468 | |
Class R-3 | | | 46,623 | | | | 2,561 | | | | 879 | | | | 59 | | | | (34,068 | ) | | | (1,913 | ) | | | 13,434 | | | | 707 | |
Class R-4 | | | 31,805 | | | | 1,797 | | | | 813 | | | | 54 | | | | (21,230 | ) | | | (1,202 | ) | | | 11,388 | | | | 649 | |
Class R-5 | | | 91,779 | | | | 5,217 | | | | 3,166 | | | | 209 | | | | (144,473 | ) | | | (8,199 | ) | | | (49,528 | ) | | | (2,773 | ) |
Class R-6(2) | | | 129,948 | | | | 7,242 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (3,862 | ) | | | (192 | ) | | | 126,086 | | | | 7,050 | |
Total net increase | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(decrease) | | $ | 1,333,941 | | | | 73,849 | | | $ | 68,389 | | | | 4,520 | | | $ | (1,535,324 | ) | | | (89,645 | ) | | $ | (132,994 | ) | | | (11,276 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended November 30, 2008 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 689,706 | | | | 30,637 | | | $ | 686,864 | | | | 24,977 | | | $ | (1,220,250 | ) | | | (56,281 | ) | | $ | 156,320 | | | | (667 | ) |
Class B | | | 17,569 | | | | 800 | | | | 18,982 | | | | 719 | | | | (58,213 | ) | | | (2,732 | ) | | | (21,662 | ) | | | (1,213 | ) |
Class C | | | 51,443 | | | | 2,330 | | | | 17,883 | | | | 683 | | | | (54,142 | ) | | | (2,632 | ) | | | 15,184 | | | | 381 | |
Class F-1 | | | 163,220 | | | | 7,046 | | | | 41,162 | | | | 1,508 | | | | (261,119 | ) | | | (13,280 | ) | | | (56,737 | ) | | | (4,726 | ) |
Class F-2(3) | | | 4,160 | | | | 221 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | (1,227 | ) | | | (63 | ) | | | 2,933 | | | | 158 | |
Class 529-A | | | 22,890 | | | | 975 | | | | 9,570 | | | | 349 | | | | (9,740 | ) | | | (451 | ) | | | 22,720 | | | | 873 | |
Class 529-B | | | 2,087 | | | | 92 | | | | 1,404 | | | | 52 | | | | (1,504 | ) | | | (70 | ) | | | 1,987 | | | | 74 | |
Class 529-C | | | 9,485 | | | | 413 | | | | 3,084 | | | | 116 | | | | (4,628 | ) | | | (219 | ) | | | 7,941 | | | | 310 | |
Class 529-E | | | 1,335 | | | | 59 | | | | 502 | | | | 18 | | | | (591 | ) | | | (26 | ) | | | 1,246 | | | | 51 | |
Class 529-F-1 | | | 1,701 | | | | 72 | | | | 320 | | | | 12 | | | | (569 | ) | | | (25 | ) | | | 1,452 | | | | 59 | |
Class R-1 | | | 8,237 | | | | 348 | | | | 1,224 | | | | 46 | | | | (5,360 | ) | | | (240 | ) | | | 4,101 | | | | 154 | |
Class R-2 | | | 38,015 | | | | 1,693 | | | | 9,407 | | | | 350 | | | | (27,802 | ) | | | (1,288 | ) | | | 19,620 | | | | 755 | |
Class R-3 | | | 63,270 | | | | 2,693 | | | | 10,385 | | | | 382 | | | | (46,003 | ) | | | (2,033 | ) | | | 27,652 | | | | 1,042 | |
Class R-4 | | | 39,363 | | | | 1,722 | | | | 6,408 | | | | 234 | | | | (25,273 | ) | | | (1,139 | ) | | | 20,498 | | | | 817 | |
Class R-5 | | | 120,322 | | | | 5,293 | | | | 16,352 | | | | 593 | | | | (35,956 | ) | | | (1,606 | ) | | | 100,718 | | | | 4,280 | |
Total net increase | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(decrease) | | $ | 1,232,803 | | | | 54,394 | | | $ | 823,547 | | | | 30,039 | | | $ | (1,752,377 | ) | | | (82,085 | ) | | $ | 303,973 | | | | 2,348 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Includes exchanges between share classes of the fund. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(2) Class R-6 was offered beginning May 1, 2009. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(3)Class F-2 was offered beginning August 1, 2008. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
8. Investment transactions
The fund made purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities and U.S. government obligations, if any, of $2,814,817,000 and $2,732,566,000, respectively, during the year ended November 30, 2009.
9. Subsequent events
As of January 13, 2010, the date the financial statements were available to be issued, no subsequent events or transactions had occurred that would have materially impacted the financial statements as presented.
| | | | | Income (loss) from investment operations(2) | | | Dividends and distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Net asset value, beginning of period | | | Net investment income | | | Net gains (losses) on securities (both realized and unrealized) | | | Total from investment operations | | | Dividends (from net investment income) | | | Distributions (from capital gains) | | | Total dividends and distributions | | | Net asset value, end of period | | | Total return(3) (4) | | | Net assets, end of period (in millions) | | | Ratio of expenses to average net assets before reimbursements/ waivers | | | Ratio of expenses to average net assets after reimbursements/ waivers(4) | | | Ratio of net income (loss) to average net assets(4) | |
Class A: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | $ | 15.22 | | | $ | .12 | | | $ | 6.76 | | | $ | 6.88 | | | $ | (.23 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (.23 | ) | | $ | 21.87 | | | | 45.88 | % | | $ | 5,733 | | | | .95 | % | | | .94 | % | | | .67 | % |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 30.09 | | | | .29 | | | | (12.57 | ) | | | (12.28 | ) | | | (.23 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.59 | ) | | | 15.22 | | | | (44.67 | ) | | | 4,237 | | | | .83 | | | | .79 | | | | 1.24 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 26.41 | | | | .25 | | | | 3.62 | | | | 3.87 | | | | (.19 | ) | | | - | | | | (.19 | ) | | | 30.09 | | | | 14.75 | | | | 8,394 | | | | .80 | | | | .76 | | | | .87 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.98 | | | | .20 | | | | 3.38 | | | | 3.58 | | | | (.15 | ) | | | - | | | | (.15 | ) | | | 26.41 | | | | 15.65 | | | | 7,654 | | | | .82 | | | | .78 | | | | .83 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 20.27 | | | | .15 | | | | 2.63 | | | | 2.78 | | | | (.07 | ) | | | - | | | | (.07 | ) | | | 22.98 | | | | 13.79 | | | | 7,061 | | | | .83 | | | | .79 | | | | .73 | |
Class B: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 14.50 | | | | (.02 | ) | | | 6.50 | | | | 6.48 | | | | (.03 | ) | | | - | | | | (.03 | ) | | | 20.95 | | | | 44.73 | | | | 117 | | | | 1.72 | | | | 1.71 | | | | (.09 | ) |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 28.80 | | | | .10 | | | | (12.00 | ) | | | (11.90 | ) | | | (.04 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.40 | ) | | | 14.50 | | | | (45.08 | ) | | | 100 | | | | 1.60 | | | | 1.56 | | | | .47 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 25.30 | | | | .03 | | | | 3.48 | | | | 3.51 | | | | (.01 | ) | | | - | | | | (.01 | ) | | | 28.80 | | | | 13.89 | | | | 234 | | | | 1.56 | | | | 1.52 | | | | .11 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.05 | | | | .01 | | | | 3.24 | | | | 3.25 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 25.30 | | | | 14.74 | | | | 207 | | | | 1.59 | | | | 1.55 | | | | .06 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 19.52 | | | | (.01 | ) | | | 2.54 | | | | 2.53 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 22.05 | | | | 12.96 | | | | 185 | | | | 1.60 | | | | 1.57 | | | | (.05 | ) |
Class C: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 14.39 | | | | (.02 | ) | | | 6.44 | | | | 6.42 | | | | (.06 | ) | | | - | | | | (.06 | ) | | | 20.75 | | | | 44.81 | | | | 182 | | | | 1.69 | | | | 1.68 | | | | (.09 | ) |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 28.63 | | | | .10 | | | | (11.91 | ) | | | (11.81 | ) | | | (.07 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.43 | ) | | | 14.39 | | | | (45.09 | ) | | | 113 | | | | 1.62 | | | | 1.58 | | | | .46 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 25.18 | | | | .02 | | | | 3.46 | | | | 3.48 | | | | (.03 | ) | | | - | | | | (.03 | ) | | | 28.63 | | | | 13.84 | | | | 215 | | | | 1.61 | | | | 1.57 | | | | .06 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 21.96 | | | _ (5) | | | | 3.23 | | | | 3.23 | | | | (.01 | ) | | | - | | | | (.01 | ) | | | 25.18 | | | | 14.70 | | | | 136 | | | | 1.64 | | | | 1.60 | | | | .01 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 19.46 | | | | (.02 | ) | | | 2.52 | | | | 2.50 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 21.96 | | | | 12.85 | | | | 96 | | | | 1.65 | | | | 1.61 | | | | (.09 | ) |
Class F-1: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 15.11 | | | | .12 | | | | 6.77 | | | | 6.89 | | | | (.10 | ) | | | - | | | | (.10 | ) | | | 21.90 | | | | 45.93 | | | | 187 | | | | .91 | | | | .91 | | | | .66 | |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 29.91 | | | | .28 | | | | (12.48 | ) | | | (12.20 | ) | | | (.24 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.60 | ) | | | 15.11 | | | | (44.68 | ) | | | 188 | | | | .85 | | | | .81 | | | | 1.22 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 26.28 | | | | .25 | | | | 3.60 | | | | 3.85 | | | | (.22 | ) | | | - | | | | (.22 | ) | | | 29.91 | | | | 14.76 | | | | 515 | | | | .80 | | | | .76 | | | | .88 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.88 | | | | .19 | | | | 3.37 | | | | 3.56 | | | | (.16 | ) | | | - | | | | (.16 | ) | | | 26.28 | | | | 15.63 | | | | 248 | | | | .83 | | | | .79 | | | | .81 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 20.19 | | | | .15 | | | | 2.62 | | | | 2.77 | | | | (.08 | ) | | | - | | | | (.08 | ) | | | 22.88 | | | | 13.77 | | | | 114 | | | | .86 | | | | .83 | | | | .70 | |
Class F-2: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 15.24 | | | | .14 | | | | 6.81 | | | | 6.95 | | | | (.26 | ) | | | - | | | | (.26 | ) | | | 21.93 | | | | 46.33 | | | | 54 | | | | .62 | | | | .61 | | | | .69 | |
Period from 8/1/2008 to 11/30/2008 | | | 22.62 | | | | .07 | | | | (7.45 | ) | | | (7.38 | ) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 15.24 | | | | (32.63 | ) | | | 2 | | | | .21 | | | | .19 | | | | .37 | |
Class 529-A: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 15.16 | | | | .12 | | | | 6.72 | | | | 6.84 | | | | (.23 | ) | | | - | | | | (.23 | ) | | | 21.77 | | | | 45.84 | | | | 110 | | | | .97 | | | | .97 | | | | .64 | |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 29.98 | | | | .28 | | | | (12.52 | ) | | | (12.24 | ) | | | (.22 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.58 | ) | | | 15.16 | | | | (44.68 | ) | | | 69 | | | | .87 | | | | .83 | | | | 1.22 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 26.34 | | | | .23 | | | | 3.61 | | | | 3.84 | | | | (.20 | ) | | | - | | | | (.20 | ) | | | 29.98 | | | | 14.66 | | | | 109 | | | | .86 | | | | .82 | | | | .81 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.93 | | | | .19 | | | | 3.37 | | | | 3.56 | | | | (.15 | ) | | | - | | | | (.15 | ) | | | 26.34 | | | | 15.61 | | | | 75 | | | | .85 | | | | .81 | | | | .80 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 20.24 | | | | .14 | | | | 2.63 | | | | 2.77 | | | | (.08 | ) | | | - | | | | (.08 | ) | | | 22.93 | | | | 13.74 | | | | 51 | | | | .87 | | | | .84 | | | | .69 | |
Class 529-B: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 14.63 | | | | (.03 | ) | | | 6.54 | | | | 6.51 | | | | (.05 | ) | | | - | | | | (.05 | ) | | | 21.09 | | | | 44.65 | | | | 14 | | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.80 | | | | (.18 | ) |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 29.05 | | | | .08 | | | | (12.12 | ) | | | (12.04 | ) | | | (.02 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.38 | ) | | | 14.63 | | | | (45.14 | ) | | | 10 | | | | 1.71 | | | | 1.66 | | | | .38 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 25.54 | | | | (.01 | ) | | | 3.52 | | | | 3.51 | | | _ (5) | | | | - | | | _ (5) | | | | 29.05 | | | | 13.75 | | | | 17 | | | | 1.69 | | | | 1.65 | | | | (.02 | ) |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.28 | | | | (.02 | ) | | | 3.28 | | | | 3.26 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 25.54 | | | | 14.63 | | | | 13 | | | | 1.72 | | | | 1.68 | | | | (.07 | ) |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 19.76 | | | | (.04 | ) | | | 2.56 | | | | 2.52 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 22.28 | | | | 12.75 | | | | 10 | | | | 1.76 | | | | 1.72 | | | | (.20 | ) |
Class 529-C: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 14.62 | | | | (.03 | ) | | | 6.53 | | | | 6.50 | | | | (.06 | ) | | | - | | | | (.06 | ) | | | 21.06 | | | | 44.71 | | | | 36 | | | | 1.79 | | | | 1.79 | | | | (.18 | ) |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 29.04 | | | | .09 | | | | (12.10 | ) | | | (12.01 | ) | | | (.05 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.41 | ) | | | 14.62 | | | | (45.15 | ) | | | 23 | | | | 1.70 | | | | 1.66 | | | | .39 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 25.55 | | | _ (5) | | | | 3.51 | | | | 3.51 | | | | (.02 | ) | | | - | | | | (.02 | ) | | | 29.04 | | | | 13.77 | | | | 36 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.64 | | | | (.02 | ) |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.30 | | | | (.01 | ) | | | 3.26 | | | | 3.25 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 25.55 | | | | 14.57 | | | | 24 | | | | 1.71 | | | | 1.67 | | | | (.06 | ) |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 19.77 | | | | (.04 | ) | | | 2.57 | | | | 2.53 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 22.30 | | | | 12.80 | | | | 15 | | | | 1.75 | | | | 1.71 | | | | (.18 | ) |
Class 529-E: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 15.01 | | | | .06 | | | | 6.67 | | | | 6.73 | | | | (.17 | ) | | | - | | | | (.17 | ) | | | 21.57 | | | | 45.45 | | | | 6 | | | | 1.28 | | | | 1.27 | | | | .34 | |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 29.71 | | | | .20 | | | | (12.39 | ) | | | (12.19 | ) | | | (.15 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.51 | ) | | | 15.01 | | | | (44.86 | ) | | | 4 | | | | 1.19 | | | | 1.15 | | | | .90 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 26.11 | | | | .14 | | | | 3.58 | | | | 3.72 | | | | (.12 | ) | | | - | | | | (.12 | ) | | | 29.71 | | | | 14.32 | | | | 6 | | | | 1.17 | | | | 1.13 | | | | .50 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.75 | | | | .11 | | | | 3.34 | | | | 3.45 | | | | (.09 | ) | | | - | | | | (.09 | ) | | | 26.11 | | | | 15.22 | | | | 4 | | | | 1.18 | | | | 1.14 | | | | .47 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 20.09 | | | | .07 | | | | 2.61 | | | | 2.68 | | | | (.02 | ) | | | - | | | | (.02 | ) | | | 22.75 | | | | 13.37 | | | | 3 | | | | 1.22 | | | | 1.18 | | | | .35 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class 529-F-1: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | $ | 15.17 | | | $ | .15 | | | $ | 6.73 | | | $ | 6.88 | | | $ | (.28 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (.28 | ) | | $ | 21.77 | | | | 46.18 | % | | $ | 6 | | | | .78 | % | | | .77 | % | | | .79 | % |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 30.00 | | | | .32 | | | | (12.52 | ) | | | (12.20 | ) | | | (.27 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.63 | ) | | | 15.17 | | | | (44.58 | ) | | | 3 | | | | .69 | | | | .65 | | | | 1.41 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 26.34 | | | | .28 | | | | 3.62 | | | | 3.90 | | | | (.24 | ) | | | - | | | | (.24 | ) | | | 30.00 | | | | 14.92 | | | | 3 | | | | .67 | | | | .63 | | | | .99 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.92 | | | | .23 | | | | 3.36 | | | | 3.59 | | | | (.17 | ) | | | - | | | | (.17 | ) | | | 26.34 | | | | 15.77 | | | | 2 | | | | .68 | | | | .64 | | | | .97 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 20.20 | | | | .16 | | | | 2.63 | | | | 2.79 | | | | (.07 | ) | | | - | | | | (.07 | ) | | | 22.92 | | | | 13.84 | | | | 1 | | | | .81 | | | | .77 | | | | .76 | |
Class R-1: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 14.71 | | | | (.01 | ) | | | 6.57 | | | | 6.56 | | | | (.07 | ) | | | - | | | | (.07 | ) | | | 21.20 | | | | 44.78 | | | | 16 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.68 | | | | (.08 | ) |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 29.22 | | | | .11 | | | | (12.18 | ) | | | (12.07 | ) | | | (.08 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.44 | ) | | | 14.71 | | | | (45.08 | ) | | | 10 | | | | 1.61 | | | | 1.57 | | | | .50 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 25.74 | | | | .01 | | | | 3.54 | | | | 3.55 | | | | (.07 | ) | | | - | | | | (.07 | ) | | | 29.22 | | | | 13.84 | | | | 15 | | | | 1.61 | | | | 1.57 | | | | .04 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.47 | | | _ (5) | | | | 3.30 | | | | 3.30 | | | | (.03 | ) | | | - | | | | (.03 | ) | | | 25.74 | | | | 14.72 | | | | 8 | | | | 1.64 | | | | 1.58 | | | | .01 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 19.90 | | | | (.02 | ) | | | 2.59 | | | | 2.57 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 22.47 | | | | 12.91 | | | | 4 | | | | 1.70 | | | | 1.61 | | | | (.09 | ) |
Class R-2: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 14.76 | | | | (.03 | ) | | | 6.59 | | | | 6.56 | | | | (.06 | ) | | | - | | | | (.06 | ) | | | 21.26 | | | | 44.58 | | | | 108 | | | | 1.81 | | | | 1.80 | | | | (.19 | ) |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 29.30 | | | | .08 | | | | (12.22 | ) | | | (12.14 | ) | | | (.04 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.40 | ) | | | 14.76 | | | | (45.13 | ) | | | 68 | | | | 1.72 | | | | 1.68 | | | | .37 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 25.77 | | | | .02 | | | | 3.54 | | | | 3.56 | | | | (.03 | ) | | | - | | | | (.03 | ) | | | 29.30 | | | | 13.83 | | | | 113 | | | | 1.67 | | | | 1.56 | | | | .07 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.47 | | | | .01 | | | | 3.30 | | | | 3.31 | | | | (.01 | ) | | | - | | | | (.01 | ) | | | 25.77 | | | | 14.74 | | | | 85 | | | | 1.81 | | | | 1.58 | | | | .04 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 19.90 | | | | (.01 | ) | | | 2.58 | | | | 2.57 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 22.47 | | | | 12.91 | | | | 61 | | | | 1.91 | | | | 1.58 | | | | (.05 | ) |
Class R-3: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 15.01 | | | | .07 | | | | 6.67 | | | | 6.74 | | | | (.17 | ) | | | - | | | | (.17 | ) | | | 21.58 | | | | 45.39 | | | | 127 | | | | 1.25 | | | | 1.24 | | | | .36 | |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 29.72 | | | | .21 | | | | (12.40 | ) | | | (12.19 | ) | | | (.16 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.52 | ) | | | 15.01 | | | | (44.83 | ) | | | 78 | | | | 1.17 | | | | 1.13 | | | | .93 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 26.11 | | | | .14 | | | | 3.59 | | | | 3.73 | | | | (.12 | ) | | | - | | | | (.12 | ) | | | 29.72 | | | | 14.34 | | | | 123 | | | | 1.17 | | | | 1.13 | | | | .50 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.75 | | | | .10 | | | | 3.34 | | | | 3.44 | | | | (.08 | ) | | | - | | | | (.08 | ) | | | 26.11 | | | | 15.18 | | | | 76 | | | | 1.22 | | | | 1.18 | | | | .44 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 20.10 | | | | .07 | | | | 2.61 | | | | 2.68 | | | | (.03 | ) | | | - | | | | (.03 | ) | | | 22.75 | | | | 13.35 | | | | 50 | | | | 1.24 | | | | 1.19 | | | | .33 | |
Class R-4: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 15.17 | | | | .13 | | | | 6.73 | | | | 6.86 | | | | (.24 | ) | | | - | | | | (.24 | ) | | | 21.79 | | | | 45.97 | | | | 85 | | | | .90 | | | | .90 | | | | .71 | |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 30.01 | | | | .28 | | | | (12.52 | ) | | | (12.24 | ) | | | (.24 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.60 | ) | | | 15.17 | | | | (44.67 | ) | | | 49 | | | | .84 | | | | .80 | | | | 1.25 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 26.34 | | | | .24 | | | | 3.62 | | | | 3.86 | | | | (.19 | ) | | | - | | | | (.19 | ) | | | 30.01 | | | | 14.74 | | | | 73 | | | | .83 | | | | .79 | | | | .83 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 22.94 | | | | .19 | | | | 3.37 | | | | 3.56 | | | | (.16 | ) | | | - | | | | (.16 | ) | | | 26.34 | | | | 15.61 | | | | 40 | | | | .86 | | | | .82 | | | | .79 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 20.25 | | | | .15 | | | | 2.63 | | | | 2.78 | | | | (.09 | ) | | | - | | | | (.09 | ) | | | 22.94 | | | | 13.76 | | | | 31 | | | | .86 | | | | .82 | | | | .70 | |
Class R-5: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year ended 11/30/2009 | | | 15.31 | | | | .17 | | | | 6.80 | | | | 6.97 | | | | (.31 | ) | | | - | | | | (.31 | ) | | | 21.97 | | | | 46.45 | | | | 165 | | | | .59 | | | | .59 | | | | .99 | |
Year ended 11/30/2008 | | | 30.24 | | | | .36 | | | | (12.63 | ) | | | (12.27 | ) | | | (.30 | ) | | | (2.36 | ) | | | (2.66 | ) | | | 15.31 | | | | (44.50 | ) | | | 157 | | | | .53 | | | | .49 | | | | 1.58 | |
Year ended 11/30/2007 | | | 26.54 | | | | .32 | | | | 3.64 | | | | 3.96 | | | | (.26 | ) | | | - | | | | (.26 | ) | | | 30.24 | | | | 15.06 | | | | 181 | | | | .54 | | | | .50 | | | | 1.12 | |
Year ended 11/30/2006 | | | 23.10 | | | | .27 | | | | 3.38 | | | | 3.65 | | | | (.21 | ) | | | - | | | | (.21 | ) | | | 26.54 | | | | 15.94 | | | | 109 | | | | .55 | | | | .51 | | | | 1.10 | |
Year ended 11/30/2005 | | | 20.37 | | | | .21 | | | | 2.65 | | | | 2.86 | | | | (.13 | ) | | | - | | | | (.13 | ) | | | 23.10 | | | | 14.14 | | | | 76 | | | | .55 | | | | .52 | | | | 1.02 | |
Class R-6: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period from 5/1/2009 to 11/30/2009 | | | 17.22 | | | | .13 | | | | 4.57 | | | | 4.70 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 21.92 | | | | 27.29 | | | | 154 | | | | .54 | (6) | | | .54 | (6) | | | 1.06 | (6) |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of The New Economy Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the summary investment portfolio, of The New Economy Fund (the “Fund”), as of November 30, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of November 30, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The New Economy Fund as of November 30, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Costa Mesa, California
January 13, 2010
Expense example
60; unaudited
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as initial sales charges on purchase payments and contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions (loads), and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund so you can compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (June 1, 2009, through November 30, 2009).
Actual expenses:
The first line of each share class in the table on the next page provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled "Expenses paid during period" to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes:
The second line of each share class in the table on the next page provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual expense ratio for the share class and an assumed rate of return of 5.00% per year before expenses, which is not the actual return of the share class. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5.00% hypothetical example with the 5.00% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Notes:
There are some account fees that are charged to certain types of accounts, such as individual retirement accounts and 529 college savings plan accounts (generally, a $10 fee is charged to set up the account and an additional $10 fee is charged to the account annually), that would increase the amount of expenses paid on your account. In addition, retirement plan participants may be subject to certain fees charged by the plan sponsor, and Class F-1, F-2 and 529-F-1 shareholders may be subject to fees charged by financial intermediaries, typically ranging from 0.75% to 1.50% of assets annually depending on services offered. You can estimate the impact of these fees by adding the amount of the fees to the total estimated expenses you paid on your account during the period as calculated above. In addition, your ending account value would be lower by the amount of these fees.
Note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line of each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
| | Beginning account value 6/1/2009 | | | Ending account value 11/30/2009 | | | Expenses paid during period* | | | Annualized expense ratio | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A -- actual return | | $ | 1,000.00 | | | $ | 1,191.83 | | | $ | 5.06 | | | | .92 | % |
Class A -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,020.46 | | | | 4.66 | | | | .92 | |
Class B -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,186.96 | | | | 9.27 | | | | 1.69 | |
Class B -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,016.60 | | | | 8.54 | | | | 1.69 | |
Class C -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,187.07 | | | | 9.21 | | | | 1.68 | |
Class C -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,016.65 | | | | 8.49 | | | | 1.68 | |
Class F-1 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,191.51 | | | | 4.94 | | | | .90 | |
Class F-1 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,020.56 | | | | 4.56 | | | | .90 | |
Class F-2 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,193.80 | | | | 3.35 | | | | .61 | |
Class F-2 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,022.01 | | | | 3.09 | | | | .61 | |
Class 529-A -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,190.93 | | | | 5.33 | | | | .97 | |
Class 529-A -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,020.21 | | | | 4.91 | | | | .97 | |
Class 529-B -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,186.84 | | | | 9.81 | | | | 1.79 | |
Class 529-B -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,016.09 | | | | 9.05 | | | | 1.79 | |
Class 529-C -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,186.48 | | | | 9.76 | | | | 1.78 | |
Class 529-C -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,016.14 | | | | 9.00 | | | | 1.78 | |
Class 529-E -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,189.74 | | | | 6.97 | | | | 1.27 | |
Class 529-E -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,018.70 | | | | 6.43 | | | | 1.27 | |
Class 529-F-1 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,192.89 | | | | 4.23 | | | | .77 | |
Class 529-F-1 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,021.21 | | | | 3.90 | | | | .77 | |
Class R-1 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,187.01 | | | | 9.16 | | | | 1.67 | |
Class R-1 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,016.70 | | | | 8.44 | | | | 1.67 | |
Class R-2 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,187.05 | | | | 9.59 | | | | 1.75 | |
Class R-2 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,016.29 | | | | 8.85 | | | | 1.75 | |
Class R-3 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,189.64 | | | | 6.75 | | | | 1.23 | |
Class R-3 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,018.90 | | | | 6.23 | | | | 1.23 | |
Class R-4 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,192.02 | | | | 4.95 | | | | .90 | |
Class R-4 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,020.56 | | | | 4.56 | | | | .90 | |
Class R-5 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,193.37 | | | | 3.24 | | | | .59 | |
Class R-5 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,022.11 | | | | 2.99 | | | | .59 | |
Class R-6 -- actual return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,193.89 | | | | 2.97 | | | | .54 | |
Class R-6 -- assumed 5% return | | | 1,000.00 | | | | 1,022.36 | | | | 2.74 | | | | .54 | |
*The “expenses paid during period” are equal to the “annualized expense ratio,” multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, and divided by 365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
Tax information
unaudited
We are required to advise you within 60 days of the fund’s fiscal year-end regarding the federal tax status of certain distributions received by shareholders during such fiscal year. The fund hereby designates the following amounts for the fund’s fiscal year ended November 30, 2009:
Qualified dividend income | | | 100 | % |
Corporate dividends received deduction | | $ | 34,940,000 | |
U.S. government income that may be exempt from state taxation | | $ | 310,000 | |
Individual shareholders should refer to their Form 1099 or other tax information, which will be mailed in January 2010, to determine the calendar year amounts to be included on their 2009 tax returns. Shareholders should consult their tax advisers.
Change in independent registered public accounting firm
Upon the recommendation of the fund’s audit committee on December 2, 2009, a majority of the fund’s board of trustees, including a majority of the independent trustees, approved the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the fund’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fund’s fiscal 2010 audit subject to the right of the fund, by a majority vote of the shareholders at any meeting called for that purpose, to terminate the appointment without penalty. At no point during the current fiscal year have there been any disagreements between management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the fund’s former independent registered public accounting firm.
Approval of Investment Advisory and Service Agreement
The fund’s board has approved the fund’s Investment Advisory and Service Agreement (the “agreement”) with Capital Research and Management Company (“CRMC”) for an additional one-year term through November 30, 2010. The board approved the agreement following the recommendation of the fund’s Contracts and Governance Committee (the “committee”), which is composed of all of the fund’s independent board members. The board and the committee determined that the fund’s advisory fee structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided and that approving the agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
In reaching this decision, the board and the committee took into account information furnished to them throughout the year, as well as information prepared specifically in connection with their review of the agreement and were advised by their independent counsel. They considered the factors discussed below, among others, but did not identify any single issue or particular piece of information that, in isolation, was the controlling factor.
1. Nature, extent and quality of services
The board and the committee considered the depth and quality of CRMC’s investment management process, including its global research capabilities; the experience, capability and integrity of its senior management and other personnel; the low turnover rates of its key personnel; the overall financial strength and stability of its organization; and the ongoing evolution of CRMC’s organizational structure designed to maintain and strengthen these qualities. The board and the committee considered, among other things, the impact of current market conditions on the fund and CRMC. The board and the committee also considered the nature, extent and quality of administrative, compliance and shareholder services provided by CRMC to the fund under the agreement and other agreements as well as the benefits to fund shareholders from investing in a fund that is part of a large family of funds. The board and the committee concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by CRMC have benefited and should continue to benefit the fund and its shareholders.
2. Investment results
The board and the committee considered the investment results of the fund in light of its objective of providing long-term growth of capital. They compared the fund’s total returns with those of other relevant funds (including the other funds that are the basis of the Lipper index for the category in which the fund is included) and market data such as relevant market indices, in each case as available at the time of the related meetings. In addition to the information reviewed by the board and the committee, this report, including the letter to shareholders and related disclosures, contains certain information about the fund’s investment results. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s long-term results have been satisfactory and that CRMC’s record in managing the fund indicated that its continued management should benefit the fund and its shareholders.
3. Advisory fees and total expenses
The board and the committee compared the advisory fees and total expense levels of the fund to those of other relevant funds. They observed that the fund’s advisory fees and expenses remain significantly below those of most other relevant funds. The board and the committee also noted the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure that reduce the level of fees charged by CRMC to the fund as fund assets increase. In addition, they reviewed information regarding the advisory fees paid by institutional clients of an affiliate of CRMC with investment mandates similar to those of the fund. They noted that, although the fees paid by those clients generally were lower than those paid by the fund, the differences appropriately reflected the significant investment, operational and regulatory differences between advising mutual funds and institutional clients. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s cost structure was fair and reasonable in relation to the services provided, and that the shareholders receive reasonable value in return for the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
4. Ancillary benefits
The board and the committee considered a variety of other benefits received by CRMC and its affiliates as a result of CRMC’s relationship with the fund and the other American Funds, including fees for administrative services provided to certain share classes; fees paid to CRMC’s affiliated transfer agent; sales charges and distribution fees received and retained by the fund’s principal underwriter, an affiliate of CRMC; and possible ancillary benefits to CRMC’s institutional management affiliates. The board and the committee reviewed CRMC’s portfolio trading practices, noting that while CRMC receives the benefit of research provided by broker-dealers executing portfolio transactions on behalf of the fund, it does not obtain third-party research or other services in return for allocating brokerage to such broker-dealers. The board and the committee took these ancillary benefits into account in evaluating the reasonableness of the advisory fees and other amounts paid to CRMC by the fund.
5. Adviser financial information
The board and the committee reviewed information regarding CRMC’s costs of providing services to the American Funds, including personnel, systems and resources of investment, compliance, trading, accounting and other administrative operations. They considered CRMC’s costs and willingness to invest in technology, infrastructure and staff to maintain and expand services and capabilities, respond to industry and regulatory developments and attract and retain qualified personnel. They noted information previously received regarding the compensation structure for CRMC’s investment professionals. The board and the committee also compared CRMC’s profitability to the reported results of several large, publicly held investment management companies. The board and the committee noted the competitiveness and cyclicality of both the mutual fund industry and the capital markets, and the importance in that environment of CRMC’s long-term profitability for maintaining its independence, company culture and management continuity. They further considered the breakpoint discounts in the fund’s advisory fee structure and the termination of CRMC’s 10% advisory fee waiver effective December 31, 2008. The board and the committee concluded that the fund’s advisory fee structure reflected a reasonable sharing of benefits between CRMC and the fund’s shareholders.
Board of trustees and other officers
“Independent” trustees | | |
| | |
| Year first | |
| elected | |
| a trustee | |
Name and age | of the fund1 | Principal occupation(s) during past five years |
| | |
Joseph C. Berenato, 63 | 2000 | Chairman, Ducommun Incorporated (aerospace components manufacturer) |
| | |
H. Frederick Christie,4 76 | 1983–2008 | Private investor; former President and CEO, |
Chairman of the Board | 2010 | The Mission Group (non-utility holding company, |
(Independent and Non-Executive) | | subsidiary of Southern California Edison Company) |
| | |
Robert J. Denison,4 68 | 2010 | Chair, First Security Management (private investment) |
| | |
Mary Anne Dolan, 62 | 2008 | Founder and President, MAD Ink (communications company); former Editor-in-Chief, The Los Angeles Herald Examiner |
| | |
R. Clark Hooper, 63 | 2006 | Private investor; former President, Dumbarton Group LLC (securities industry consulting); former Executive Vice President — Policy and Oversight, NASD |
| | |
Koichi Itoh,4 69 | 2010 | Executive Chairman of the Board, Itoh Building Co., Ltd. (building management); former President, Autosplice KK (electronics) |
| | |
Merit E. Janow,4 51 | 2010 | Professor, Columbia University, School of International and Public Affairs; former Member, World Trade Organization Appellate Body |
| | |
Leonade D. Jones, 62 | 1995 | Co-founder, VentureThink LLC (developed and managed e-commerce businesses) and Versura Inc. (education loan exchange); former Treasurer, The Washington Post Company |
| | |
Gail L. Neale,4 74 | 2010 | President, The Lovejoy Consulting Group, Inc. (a pro bono consulting group advising nonprofit organizations) |
| | |
Robert J. O’Neill, Ph.D.,4 73 | 2010 | Member of the Board of Directors, The Lowy Institute for International Policy Studies, Sydney, Australia; Chairman, Academic Advisory Committee, United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney, Australia; Chairman of Directors, Forty Seven Friends Pty Ltd (a not-for-profit supporting a local art and craft center in Australia); former Planning Director and acting CEO, United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney, Australia; former Deputy Chairman of the Council and Chairman of the International Advisory Panel, Graduate School of Government, University of Sydney, Australia; former Chairman of the Council, Australian Strategic Policy Institute; former Chichele Professor of the History of War and Fellow, All Souls College, University of Oxford; former Chairman of the Council, International Institute for Strategic Studies |
| | |
Stefanie Powers,4 67 | 2010 | Actor, Producer; Co-founder and President of The William Holden Wildlife Foundation; conservation consultant to Land Rover and Jaguar North America; author of The Jaguar Conservation Trust |
| | |
Christopher E. Stone, 53 | 2007 | Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Professor of the Practice of Criminal Justice, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University |
| | |
Steadman Upham, Ph.D.,4 60 | 2010 | President and Professor of Anthropology, The University of Tulsa; former President and Professor of Archaeology, Claremont Graduate University |
| | |
| | |
“Independent” trustees | | |
| | |
| Number of | |
| portfolios | |
| in fund | |
| complex2 | |
| overseen by | |
Name and age | trustee | Other directorships3 held by trustee |
| | |
Joseph C. Berenato, 63 | 6 | None |
| | |
H. Frederick Christie,4 76 | 3 | AECOM Technology Corporation; DineEquity, Inc.; |
Chairman of the Board | | Ducommun Incorporated; SouthWest Water Company |
(Independent and Non-Executive) | | |
| | |
Robert J. Denison,4 68 | 8 | None |
| | |
Mary Anne Dolan, 62 | 9 | None |
| | |
R. Clark Hooper, 63 | 44 | JPMorgan Value Opportunities Fund, Inc.; |
| | The Swiss Helvetia Fund, Inc. |
| | |
Koichi Itoh,4 69 | 6 | None |
| | |
Merit E. Janow,4 51 | 41 | The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC; |
| | Trimble Navigation Limited |
| | |
Leonade D. Jones, 62 | 9 | None |
| | |
Gail L. Neale,4 74 | 5 | None |
| | |
Robert J. O’Neill, Ph.D.,4 73 | 3 | None |
| | |
Stefanie Powers,4 67 | 3 | None |
| | |
Christopher E. Stone, 53 | 6 | None |
| | |
Steadman Upham, Ph.D.,4 60 | 41 | None |
Richard G. Capen, Jr. and Patricia K. Woolf retired from the board in December 2009. John G. Freund and William H. Kling did not stand for election to the board at the most recent meeting of shareholders. However, they were elected to other American Funds boards. The trustees thank Ambassador Capen, Dr. Freund, Mr. Kling and Dr. Woolf for their dedication and long service to the fund.
“Interested” trustees5 | | |
| | |
| Year first | |
| elected a | |
| trustee or | Principal occupation(s) during past five years and |
Name, age and | officer of | positions held with affiliated entities or the principal |
position with fund | the fund¹ | underwriter of the fund |
| | |
Timothy D. Armour, 49 | 1991 | President and Director, Capital Research and |
Vice Chairman of the Board | | Management Company; Senior Vice President — Capital Research Global Investors, Capital Research and Management Company; Director, The Capital Group Companies, Inc.6 |
| | |
Claudia P. Huntington, 57 | 1996 | Senior Vice President — Capital Research Global |
President | | Investors, Capital Research and Management Company; Director, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
| | |
“Interested” trustees5 | | |
| | |
| Number of | |
| portfolios in | |
| fund complex2 | |
Name, age and | overseen | |
position with fund | by trustee | Other directorships3 held by trustee |
| | |
Timothy D. Armour, 49 | 2 | None |
Vice Chairman of the Board | | |
| | |
Claudia P. Huntington, 57 | 2 | None |
President | | |
The fund’s statement of additional information includes additional information about fund trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling American Funds Service Company at 800/421-0180. The address for all trustees and officers of the fund is 333 South Hope Street, Los Angeles, CA 90071, Attention: Secretary.
Other officers | | |
| | |
| Year first | |
| elected an | Principal occupation(s) during past five years and |
Name, age and | officer of | positions held with affiliated entities or the principal |
position with fund | the fund¹ | underwriter of the fund |
| | |
Paul F. Roye, 56 | 2007 | Senior Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Executive Vice President | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company; Director, American Funds Service Company;6 former Director, Division of Investment Management, United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
| | |
Gordon Crawford, 63 | 1999 | Senior Vice President — Capital Research Global |
Senior Vice President | | Investors, Capital Research and Management Company; Director, The Capital Group Companies, Inc.6 |
| | |
Mark E. Denning, 52 | 2006 | Senior Vice President — Capital Research Global |
Senior Vice President | | Investors, Capital Research Company;6 Director, Capital Research and Management Company; Director, Capital International Limited6 |
| | |
Walter R. Burkley, 43 | 2007 | Vice President and Senior Counsel — Fund Business |
Vice President | | Management Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Harold H. La, 39 | 2006 | Senior Vice President — Capital Research Global |
Vice President | | Investors, Capital Research Company6 |
| | |
David M. Riley, 42 | 2004 | Senior Vice President — Capital Research Global |
Vice President | | Investors, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Dylan J. Yolles, 40 | 2006 | Senior Vice President — Capital Research Global |
Vice President | | Investors, Capital Research Company6 |
| | |
Chad L. Norton, 49 | 1991 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Secretary | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Neal F. Wellons, 38 | 2008 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Treasurer | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Steven I. Koszalka, 45 | 2005 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Assistant Secretary | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| | |
Karl C. Grauman, 42 | 2009 | Vice President — Fund Business Management |
Assistant Treasurer | | Group, Capital Research and Management Company |
| 1Trustees and officers of the fund serve until their resignation, removal or retirement. |
| 2Capital Research and Management Company manages the American Funds, consisting of 30 funds. Capital Research and Management Company also manages American Funds Insurance Series,® which is composed of 16 funds and serves as the underlying investment vehicle for certain variable insurance contracts; American Funds Target Date Retirement Series,® Inc., which is composed of nine funds and is available through tax-deferred retirement plans and IRAs; and Endowments, which is composed of two portfolios and is available to certain nonprofit organizations. |
| 3This includes all directorships (other than those in the American Funds or other funds managed by Capital Research and Management Company) that are held by each trustee as a director of a public company or a registered investment company. |
| 4H. Frederick Christie, Robert J. Denison, Koichi Itoh, Merit E. Janow, Gail L. Neale, Robert J. O’Neill, Stefanie Powers and Steadman Upham were elected to the board by the fund’s shareholders effective January 1, 2010. |
| 5“Interested persons” within the meaning of the 1940 Act, as amended, on the basis of their affiliation with the fund’s investment adviser, Capital Research and Management Company, or affiliated entities (including the fund’s principal underwriter). |
| 6Company affiliated with Capital Research and Management Company. |
Results of meeting of shareholders held November 24, 2009
Shares outstanding (all classes) on record date (August 28, 2009): | | | 326,951,691 | | |
Total shares voting on November 24, 2009: | | | 222,822,420 | | (68.2% of shares outstanding) |
Election of board members | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trustee | | Votes for | | | Percent of shares voting for | | | Votes withheld | | | Percent of shares withheld | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Timothy D. Armour | | | 216,715,391 | | | | 97.3 | % | | | 6,107,029 | | | | 2.7 | % |
Joseph C. Berenato | | | 216,708,443 | | | | 97.3 | | | | 6,113,977 | | | | 2.7 | |
Robert J. Denison | | | 216,708,015 | | | | 97.3 | | | | 6,114,405 | | | | 2.7 | |
Mary Anne Dolan | | | 216,683,997 | | | | 97.2 | | | | 6,138,423 | | | | 2.8 | |
R. Clark Hooper | | | 216,694,007 | | | | 97.2 | | | | 6,128,413 | | | | 2.8 | |
Claudia P. Huntington | | | 216,701,719 | | | | 97.3 | | | | 6,120,701 | | | | 2.7 | |
Koichi Itoh | | | 216,661,516 | | | | 97.2 | | | | 6,160,904 | | | | 2.8 | |
Merit E. Janow | | | 216,631,577 | | | | 97.2 | | | | 6,190,843 | | | | 2.8 | |
Leonade D. Jones | | | 216,661,452 | | | | 97.2 | | | | 6,160,968 | | | | 2.8 | |
Gail L. Neale | | | 216,679,985 | | | | 97.2 | | | | 6,142,435 | | | | 2.8 | |
Robert J. O’Neill | | | 216,641,328 | | | | 97.2 | | | | 6,181,092 | | | | 2.8 | |
Stefanie Powers | | | 216,543,760 | | | | 97.2 | | | | 6,278,660 | | | | 2.8 | |
Christopher E. Stone | | | 216,700,476 | | | | 97.3 | | | | 6,121,944 | | | | 2.7 | |
Steadman Upham | | | 216,611,057 | | | | 97.2 | | | | 6,211,363 | | | | 2.8 | |
| | Votes for | | | Percent of outstanding shares voting for | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To approve an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization | | | 182,614,009 | | | | 55.9 | % | | | 4,911,485 | | | | 1.5 | % | | | 35,296,926 | * | | | 10.8 | % |
| | | | | Percent | | | | | | | | | | | | Percent | |
| | | | | of shares | | | Votes | | | shares voting | | | Votes | | | of shares | |
| | Votes for | | | voting for | | | against | | | against | | | abstaining | | | abstaining | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To update the fund’s fundamental investment policies regarding: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Borrowing | | | 181,655,793 | | | | 81.5 | % | | | 5,617,033 | | | | 2.5 | % | | | 35,549,594 | * | | | 16.0 | % |
Issuance of senior securities | | | 181,166,440 | | | | 81.3 | | | | 5,900,518 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 35,755,462 | * | | | 16.0 | |
Underwriting | | | 181,549,405 | | | | 81.5 | | | | 5,417,397 | | | | 2.4 | | | | 35,855,618 | * | | | 16.1 | |
Investments in real estate or commodities | | | 181,179,097 | | | | 81.3 | | | | 6,091,065 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 35,552,258 | * | | | 16.0 | |
Lending | | | 180,921,198 | | | | 81.2 | | | | 6,272,163 | | | | 2.8 | | | | 35,629,059 | * | | | 16.0 | |
Industry concentration | | | 181,676,802 | | | | 81.5 | | | | 5,574,127 | | | | 2.5 | | | | 35,571,491 | * | | | 16.0 | |
Elimination of certain policies | | | 180,912,172 | | | | 81.1 | | | | 5,921,433 | | | | 2.7 | | | | 35,988,815 | * | | | 16.2 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To approve a policy allowing CRMC to appoint subsidiary advisers for the fund's day-to-day investment management without additional shareholder approval | | | 179,609,928 | | | | 80.6 | | | | 7,617,755 | | | | 3.4 | | | | 35,594,737 | * | | | 16.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To approve amendments to the fund's Investment Advisory and Service Agreement with CRMC | | | 180,277,323 | | | | 80.9 | | | | 6,645,574 | | | | 3.0 | | | | 35,899,523 | * | | | 16.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To approve a form of Subsidiary Agreement and appointment of one or more subsidiary advisers for the fund | | | 179,660,534 | | | | 80.6 | | | | 7,293,979 | | | | 3.3 | | | | 35,867,907 | * | | | 16.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To approve changes to an investment policy of The New Economy Fund | | | 179,872,968 | | | | 80.7 | | | | 6,984,642 | | | | 3.2 | | | | 35,964,810 | * | | | 16.1 | |
*Includes broker non-votes.
Offices
Offices of the fund and of the investment adviser
Capital Research and Management Company
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
6455 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
Transfer agent for shareholder accounts
American Funds Service Company
(Write to the address near you.)
P.O. Box 6007
Indianapolis, IN 46206-6007
P.O. Box 2280
Norfolk, VA 23501-2280
Custodian of assets
State Street Bank and Trust Company
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
Counsel
O’Melveny & Myers LLP
400 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899
Independent registered public accounting firm
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
350 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2889
Principal underwriter
American Funds Distributors, Inc.
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
Investors should carefully consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the American Funds. This and other important information is contained in the fund’s summary prospectus and prospectus, which can be obtained from your financial professional and should be read carefully before investing. You may also call American Funds Service Company (AFS) at 800/421-0180 or visit the American Funds website at americanfunds.com.
“American Funds Proxy Voting Procedures and Principles” — which describes how we vote proxies relating to portfolio securities — is available on the American Funds website or upon request by calling AFS. The fund files its proxy voting record with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the 12 months ended June 30 by August 31. The proxy voting record is available free of charge on the SEC website at sec.gov and on the American Funds website.
A complete November 30, 2009, portfolio of The New Economy Fund’s investments is available free of charge by calling AFS or visiting the SEC website (where it is part of Form N-CSR).
The New Economy Fund files a complete list of its portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. This filing is available free of charge on the SEC website. You may also review or, for a fee, copy this filing at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Additional information regarding the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy at 800/SEC-0330. Additionally, the list of portfolio holdings is available by calling AFS.
This report is for the information of shareholders of The New Economy Fund, but it also may be used as sales literature when preceded or accompanied by the current summary prospectus or prospectus, which gives details about charges, expenses, investment objectives and operating policies of the fund. If used as sales material after March 31, 2010, this report must be accompanied by an American Funds statistical update for the most recently completed calendar quarter.
[logo - American Funds®]
The right choice for the long term®
What makes American Funds different?
For nearly 80 years, we have followed a consistent philosophy to benefit our investors. Our 30 carefully conceived, broadly diversified funds, in addition to the target date retirement series, offer opportunities that have attracted over 50 million shareholder accounts.
Our unique combination of strengths includes these five factors:
| •A long-term, value-oriented approach |
| We seek to buy securities at reasonable prices relative to their prospects and hold them for the long term. |
| •An extensive global research effort |
| Our investment professionals travel the world to find the best investment opportunities and gain a comprehensive understanding of companies and markets. |
| •The multiple portfolio counselor system |
| Our unique approach to portfolio management, developed 50 years ago, blends teamwork with individual accountability and has provided American Funds with a sustainable method of achieving fund objectives. |
| •Experienced investment professionals |
| American Funds portfolio counselors have an average of 25 years of investment experience, providing a depth of knowledge and broad perspective that few organizations have. |
| •A commitment to low management fees |
| The American Funds provide exceptional value for shareholders, with management fees that are among the lowest in the mutual fund industry. |
American Funds span a range of investment objectives
| Emphasis on long-term growth through stocks |
| The Growth Fund of America® |
| Emphasis on long-term growth and dividends through stocks |
| Capital World Growth and Income FundSM |
| International Growth and Income FundSM |
| The Investment Company of America® |
| Washington Mutual Investors FundSM |
| Emphasis on above-average income and growth through stocks and/or bonds |
| The Income Fund of America® |
| Emphasis on long-term growth and current income through stocks and bonds |
| Emphasis on current income through bonds |
| American High-Income TrustSM |
| The Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
| Intermediate Bond Fund of America® |
| Short-Term Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
| U.S. Government Securities FundSM |
| Emphasis on tax-exempt current income through municipal bonds |
| American Funds Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond FundSM |
| American High-Income Municipal Bond Fund® |
| Limited Term Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of AmericaSM |
| The Tax-Exempt Bond Fund of America® |
| State-specific tax-exempt funds |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of California® |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of Maryland® |
| The Tax-Exempt Fund of Virginia® |
| American Funds Money Market FundSM |
| •American Funds Target Date Retirement Series® |
The Capital Group Companies
American Funds Capital Research and Management Capital International Capital Guardian Capital Bank and Trust
Lit. No. MFGEAR-914-0110P
Litho in USA BBC/LPT/8064-S20677
Printed on paper containing 10% post-consumer waste
Printed with inks containing soy and/or vegetable oil
ITEM 2 – Code of Ethics