UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 |
-------- |
FORM N-CSR |
-------- |
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT FILE NUMBER 811-3967 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
40 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Joseph I. Benedek
First Investors Management Company, Inc.
Raritan Plaza I
Edison, NJ 08837-3620
(Name and address of agent for service)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE:
1-212-858-8000
DATE OF FISCAL YEAR END: SEPTEMBER 30
DATE OF REPORTING PERIOD: SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
The annual report to stockholders follows |
FOREWORD |
This report is for the information of the shareholders of the Funds. It is the policy of each Fund described in this report to mail only one copy of a Fund’s prospectus, annual report, semi-annual report and proxy statements to all shareholders who share the same mailing address and share the same last name and have invested in a Fund covered by the same document. You are deemed to consent to this policy unless you specifically revoke this policy and request that separate copies of such documents be mailed to you. In such case, you will begin to receive your own copies within 30 days after our receipt of the revocation. You may request that separate copies of these disclosure documents be mailed to you by writing to us at: Administrative Data Management Corp., Raritan Plaza I, Edison, NJ 08837-3620 or calling us at 1-800-423-4026.
The views expressed in the portfolio manager letters reflect those views of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period covered. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and we disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice.
You may obtain a free prospectus for any of the Funds by contacting your representative, calling 1-800-423-4026, writing to us at the following address: First Investors Corporation, 40 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005, or by visiting our website at www.firstinvestors.com. You should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a Fund carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund, and should be read carefully before investing.
An investment in a Fund is not a bank deposit and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency. Although the Cash Management Fund seeks to preserve a net asset value at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in it, just as it is possible to lose money by investing in any of the other Funds. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
A Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) for any of the Funds may also be obtained, without charge, upon request by calling 1-800-423-4026, writing to us at our address or by visiting our website listed above. The SAI contains more detailed information about the Funds, including information about its Trustees.
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Cash Management Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net-asset value basis was 0.0% for Class A shares, Class B shares and Institutional Class shares. The Fund maintained a $1.00 net asset value per share for each class of shares throughout the year.
The U.S. economy, as measured by gross domestic product (“GDP”), grew slightly faster than 2% during the review period, albeit in an unsteady manner, with quarterly growth ranging from –2.1% to 4.6%. This pace of economic growth was sufficient to reduce the unemployment rate from 7.2% to 5.9%, its lowest level since 2008. While a positive development, the employment picture was somewhat tempered by a continued decline in the labor force participation rate and anemic wage growth. Inflation remained subdued, with consumer prices, excluding the volatile food and energy components, increasing only 1.7%, below the Federal Reserve’s (the “Fed’s”) targeted 2% rate. The Fed remained on course to taper its bond buying program, scheduled to conclude in October, and to raise the federal funds rate in the second half of next year.
Interest rates were mixed during the review period. Short- and intermediate-term interest rates moved slightly higher in anticipation of an eventual tightening of monetary policy by the Fed. In particular, two-year and five-year Treasury note yields increased from 0.32% and 1.38% to 0.57% and 1.76%, respectively. In contrast, the benchmark ten-year Treasury note yield ended the review period lower, moving from 2.61% to 2.49%. After touching two-and-a-half year highs at the end of 2013, ten-year yields moved steadily lower for the next three quarters, confounding consensus expectations for higher interest rates in 2014. The move down in long-term yields reflected a number of factors, including slower than expected global economic growth (particularly in Europe), geopolitical events (Ukraine, Gaza, ISIS), which supported “flight-to-safety” flows into the U.S. bond market, and investors’ belief that this Fed tightening cycle would be more benign than in the past.
Yields on money market funds and the instruments that they invest in have remained at record lows, essentially where they have been for the last few years. The Fed has had an extremely accommodative interest rate policy since late 2008 and has indicated a willingness to maintain extraordinarily low short-term interest rates until certain economic conditions improve. While market expectations have varied on when this may occur, the consensus is that the current policy will remain through at least the middle of 2015. Despite the very low returns that money market funds currently offer, they remain an important part of many investment strategies, as evidenced by the approximately $2.5 trillion dollars invested in the category industrywide.
1 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
On July 23, 2014, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted amendments to certain rules under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that govern money market funds. There is a transition period extending until October 2016 for the most significant changes, with shorter transition periods for other changes. These changes will impact all SEC-registered money market funds, including the Fund, although they will impact different types of funds in different ways. First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”), the Fund’s investment adviser, is analyzing the impact of these changes and we will communicate to shareholders as the Fund transitions into compliance with the new laws over the next two years.
FIMCO expects the yield to shareholders to be at or near zero for the foreseeable future based on the outlook for money market rates. To avoid a negative yield to its shareholders, FIMCO has absorbed expenses to the Fund and has waived its management fee.
There can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to maintain a stable net-asset value of $1.00 per share. Money market mutual funds are neither insured nor guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
2 |
Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses (unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
As a mutual fund shareholder, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including a sales charge (load) on purchase payments (on Class A shares only) and a contingent deferred sales charge on redemptions (on Class B shares only); and (2) ongoing costs, including advisory fees; distribution and service fees (12b-1); and other expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 in each Fund at the beginning of the period, April 1, 2014, and held for the entire six-month period ended September 30, 2014. The calculations assume that no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.
Actual Expenses Example:
These amounts help you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from the Fund’s actual return, and the “Expenses Paid During Period” shows the dollar amount that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the Fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.
To estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period, simply divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number given for your Fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period”.
Hypothetical Expenses Example:
These amounts provide information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio for each class of shares of a Fund, and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as front-end or contingent deferred sales charges (loads or account fees that are charged to certain types of accounts, such as an annual custodial fee of $15 for certain IRA accounts and certain other retirement accounts or an annual custodial fee of $30 for 403(b) custodial accounts (subject to exceptions and certain waivers as described in the Funds’ Statement of Additional Information). Therefore, the hypothetical expenses example is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
3 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 0.08% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $0.40 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,024.67 | $0.41 | |
Class B Shares | 0.08% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $0.40 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,024.67 | $0.41 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.08% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $0.40 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,024.67 | $0.41 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived and/or assumed. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total market value of investments.
4 |
Portfolio of Investments
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | Interest | ||||||
Amount | Security | Rate | * | Value | |||
CORPORATE NOTES—39.6% | |||||||
$ 5,000M | 3M Co., 11/3/2014 (a) | 0.070 | % | $ 4,999,679 | |||
5,000M | Abbott Laboratories, 11/6/2014 (a) | 0.100 | 4,999,500 | ||||
5,000M | Apple, Inc., 11/5/2014 (a) | 0.090 | 4,999,562 | ||||
Coca-Cola Co.: | |||||||
2,000M | 11/3/2014 (a) | 0.120 | 1,999,780 | ||||
3,000M | 12/8/2014 (a) | 0.110 | 2,999,377 | ||||
2,000M | Emerson Electric Co., 11/28/2014 (a) | 0.100 | 1,999,678 | ||||
5,000M | General Electric Capital Corp., 12/29/2014 | 0.120 | 4,998,517 | ||||
2,000M | Honeywell International, Inc., 12/19/2014 (a) | 0.110 | 1,999,517 | ||||
5,000M | IBM Corp., 12/4/2014 (a) | 0.100 | 4,999,111 | ||||
5,000M | PepsiCo, Inc., 11/10/2014 (a) | 0.080 | 4,999,555 | ||||
Procter & Gamble Co.: | |||||||
2,500M | 12/10/2014 (a) | 0.120 | 2,499,417 | ||||
2,500M | 1/13/2015 (a) | 0.140 | 2,498,989 | ||||
Total Value of Corporate Notes (cost $43,992,682) | 43,992,682 | ||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—39.3% | |||||||
Fannie Mae: | |||||||
4,465M | 11/3/2014 | 0.090 | 4,464,632 | ||||
6,000M | 11/5/2014 | 0.070 | 5,999,592 | ||||
4,000M | 12/1/2014 | 0.070 | 3,999,525 | ||||
3,000M | 1/12/2015 | 0.090 | 2,999,227 | ||||
3,410M | 2/11/2015 | 0.060 | 3,409,244 | ||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
3,547M | 10/15/2014 | 0.075 | 3,546,896 | ||||
3,700M | 10/22/2014 | 0.075 | 3,699,838 | ||||
2,300M | 10/22/2014 | 0.080 | 2,299,893 | ||||
4,450M | 10/29/2014 | 0.080 | 4,449,723 | ||||
1,600M | 11/5/2014 | 0.075 | 1,599,883 | ||||
1,250M | 11/14/2014 | 0.075 | 1,249,885 | ||||
Freddie Mac: | |||||||
5,000M | 11/24/2014 | 0.080 | 4,999,400 | ||||
1,000M | 11/24/2014 | 0.090 | 999,865 | ||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $43,717,603) | 43,717,603 |
5 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | Interest | ||||||
Amount | Security | Rate | * | Value | |||
VARIABLE AND FLOATING RATE NOTES—14.9% | |||||||
$5,000M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 4/16/2015 | 0.114 | % | $ 5,000,434 | |||
5,700M | Mississippi Business Finance Corp. | ||||||
(Chevron USA, Inc.), 12/1/2030 | 0.030 | 5,700,000 | |||||
5,835M | Valdez, Alaska Marine Terminal Rev. | ||||||
(Exxon Pipeline Co., Project B), 12/1/2033 | 0.030 | 5,835,000 | |||||
Total Value of Variable and Floating Rate Notes (cost $16,535,434) | 16,535,434 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—4.5% | |||||||
5,000M | U.S. Treasury Bills, 12/11/2014 (cost $4,999,670) | 0.034 | 4,999,670 | ||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $109,245,389)** | 98.3 | % | 109,245,389 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.7 | 1,841,709 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 111,087,098 |
* | The interest rates shown are the effective rates at the time of purchase by the Fund. The interest |
rates shown on floating rate notes are adjusted periodically; the rates shownare the rates in effect | |
at September 30, 2014. | |
** | Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is the same. |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
6 |
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Notes | $ | — | $ | 43,992,682 | $ | — | $ | 43,992,682 | ||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 43,717,603 | — | 43,717,603 | ||||||||
Variable and Floating Rate Notes: | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 11,535,000 | — | 11,535,000 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 5,000,434 | — | 5,000,434 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 4,999,670 | — | 4,999,670 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 109,245,389 | $ | — | $ | 109,245,389 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 7 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20141. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was –0.50% for Class A shares, –0.28% for Advisor Class shares and –0.14% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 6.0 cents per share on Class A shares, 6.2 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 6.6 cents per share on Institutional Class shares.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
The U.S. economy, as measured by gross domestic product (“GDP”), grew slightly faster than 2% during the review period, albeit in an unsteady manner, with quarterly growth ranging from –2.1% to 4.6%. This pace of economic growth was sufficient to reduce the unemployment rate from 7.2% to 5.9%, its lowest level since 2008. While a positive development, the employment picture was somewhat tempered by a continued decline in the labor force participation rate and anemic wage growth. Inflation remained subdued, with consumer prices, excluding the volatile food and energy components, increasing only 1.7%, below the Federal Reserve’s (the “Fed’s”) targeted 2% rate. The Fed remained on course to taper its bond buying program, scheduled to conclude in October, and to raise the federal funds rate in the second half of next year.
Interest rates were mixed during the review period. Short- and intermediate-term interest rates moved slightly higher in anticipation of an eventual tightening of monetary policy by the Fed. In particular, two-year and five-year Treasury note yields increased from 0.32% and 1.38% to 0.57% and 1.76%, respectively. In contrast, the benchmark ten-year Treasury note yield ended the review period lower, moving from 2.61% to 2.49%. After touching two-and-a-half year highs at the end of 2013, ten-year yields moved steadily lower for the next three quarters, confounding consensus expectations for higher interest rates in 2014. The move down in long-term yields reflected a number of factors, including slower than expected global economic growth (particularly in Europe), geopolitical events (Ukraine, Gaza, ISIS), which supported “flight-to-safety” flows into the U.S. bond market, and investors’ belief that this Fed tightening cycle would be more benign than in the past.
Fund Overview and Fiscal Year Performance Attribution
The Fund invests in investment grade fixed income securities. The majority of the Fund’s assets were invested in investment grade corporate bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and U.S. Government securities. The Fund seeks to maintain an average duration of between two and six years.
8 |
Since the Fund commenced operations on May 19, 2014, it did not have a full fiscal year of performance to compare with its benchmark, the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 1-5 Year Broad Market Index, for the entire review period. The Fund under-performed the Index when compared over the period since the Fund’s commencement of operations. Relative performance was predominantly a function of asset allocation and Treasury yield curve movements. Specifically, the Fund’s overweight in shorter duration corporate bonds negatively impacted performance as the market rewarded longer-dated securities in the period. This was partially offset by the Fund’s overweight in mortgage backed securities, which had the highest returns relative to other fixed income sectors the Fund invests in during the review period.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
1 The Fund’s performance and the performance of its benchmark index are since May 19, 2014, the date the Fund commenced operations.
9 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.05% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 994.99 | $3.87 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.61 | $3.91 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.75% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 997.18 | $2.77 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.72 | $2.80 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.60% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 998.60 | $2.22 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,016.27 | $2.24 |
* | Actual expenses reflect only from the commencement of operations to the end of the period cov- |
ered (May 19, 2014 through September 30, 2014). Therefore expenses shown are lower than would | |
be expected for a six-month period. Actual expenses for the six-month period will be reflected in | |
future reports. Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average ac- | |
count value over the period, multiplied by 135/365 (to reflect the inception period). Expenses paid | |
during the period are net of expenses waived and/or assumed. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total market value of investments.
10 |
Portfolio of Investments
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
CORPORATE BONDS—43.1% | |||||||
Energy—3.2% | |||||||
$500M | BP Capital Markets, PLC, 3.875%, 3/10/2015 | $ 507,793 | |||||
250M | CNOOC Nexen Finance 2014 ULC, 1.625%, 4/30/2017 | 250,227 | |||||
500M | DCP Midstream Operating, LP, 2.5%, 12/1/2017 | 510,566 | |||||
1,268,586 | |||||||
Financial Services—7.2% | |||||||
500M | American Express Co., 7%, 3/19/2018 | 582,593 | |||||
500M | American International Group, Inc., 8.25%, 8/15/2018 | 611,248 | |||||
500M | ERAC USA Finance, LLC, 6.375%, 10/15/2017 (a) | 569,201 | |||||
500M | Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC, 5%, 5/15/2018 | 546,528 | |||||
500M | General Electric Capital Corp., 5.625%, 5/1/2018 | 565,548 | |||||
2,875,118 | |||||||
Financials—12.1% | |||||||
500M | Bank of America Corp., 5.65%, 5/1/2018 | 556,604 | |||||
500M | Barclays Bank, PLC, 6.75%, 5/22/2019 | 594,880 | |||||
500M | Citigroup, Inc., 6.125%, 11/21/2017 | 564,460 | |||||
500M | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 6.15%, 4/1/2018 | 564,049 | |||||
500M | JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6%, 1/15/2018 | 563,014 | |||||
500M | Morgan Stanley, 5.95%, 12/28/2017 | 560,423 | |||||
250M | SunTrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 9/11/2017 | 280,964 | |||||
500M | UBS AG, 5.875%, 12/20/2017 | 563,353 | |||||
500M | Wachovia Corp., 5.75%, 2/1/2018 | 564,042 | |||||
4,811,789 | |||||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—2.9% | |||||||
500M | Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc., 6.875%, 11/15/2019 | 600,630 | |||||
500M | Diageo Capital, PLC, 5.75%, 10/23/2017 | 562,129 | |||||
1,162,759 | |||||||
Health Care—3.4% | |||||||
250M | Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings, 2.2%, 8/23/2017 | 253,303 | |||||
500M | Novartis Securities Investments, Ltd., 5.125%, 2/10/2019 | 562,082 | |||||
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.: | |||||||
250M | 6.4%, 7/1/2017 | 282,529 | |||||
250M | 2.7%, 4/1/2019 | 251,511 | |||||
1,349,425 |
11 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Manufacturing—3.0% | ||||
$250M | CRH America, Inc., 8.125%, 7/15/2018 | $ 302,077 | ||
500M | Ingersoll-Rand Global Holdings Co., Ltd., 6.875%, 8/15/2018 | 586,095 | ||
250M | Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.55%, 10/1/2017 | 284,869 | ||
1,173,041 | ||||
Media-Broadcasting—1.5% | ||||
500M | DirecTV Holdings, LLC, 5.875%, 10/1/2019 | 573,636 | ||
Media-Diversified—.7% | ||||
250M | McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc., 5.9%, 11/15/2017 | 274,804 | ||
Metals/Mining—2.6% | ||||
500M | Newmont Mining Corp., 5.125%, 10/1/2019 | 543,550 | ||
500M | Rio Tinto Finance USA, PLC, 1.625%, 8/21/2017 | 503,042 | ||
1,046,592 | ||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—1.5% | ||||
500M | Boston Properties, LP, 5.875%, 10/15/2019 | 576,648 | ||
Telecommunications—3.0% | ||||
500M | AT&T, Inc., 5.8%, 2/15/2019 | 573,530 | ||
600M | Verizon Communications, Inc., 3.65%, 9/14/2018 | 632,531 | ||
1,206,061 | ||||
Utilities—2.0% | ||||
250M | Electricite de France SA, 6.5%, 1/26/2019 (a) | 293,388 | ||
500M | Public Service Electric & Gas Co., 1.8%, 6/1/2019 | 493,872 | ||
787,260 | ||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $17,184,351) | 17,105,719 | |||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | ||||
SECURITIES—19.2% | ||||
Fannie Mae—17.4% | ||||
1,958M | 2.5%, 1/1/2023 – 2/1/2023 | 2,008,330 | ||
2,441M | 3%, 5/1/2021 – 5/1/2023 | 2,542,526 | ||
823M | 3.5%, 1/1/2021 – 3/1/2022 (b) | 866,875 | ||
1,403M | 4%, 1/1/2021 – 2/1/2024 | 1,491,088 | ||
6,908,819 |
12 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Freddie Mac—1.8% | ||||
$ 669M | 3.5%, 12/1/2020 | $ 703,379 | ||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $7,618,093) | 7,612,198 | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—11.5% | ||||
U.S. Treasury Notes: | ||||
1,680M | 0.375%, 5/31/2016 | 1,678,458 | ||
1,200M | 0.5%, 6/15/2016 | 1,201,242 | ||
1,700M | 0.875%, 5/15/2017 | 1,697,941 | ||
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $4,579,655) | 4,577,641 | |||
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES—8.1% | ||||
Financial Services—4.9% | ||||
950M | Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust, 1%, 9/15/2017 | 953,526 | ||
1,000M | Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust, 1%, 7/16/2018 | 1,004,759 | ||
1,958,285 | ||||
Financials—3.2% | ||||
610M | Chase Issuance Trust, 1.3%, 2/18/2020 | 602,155 | ||
630M | Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust, 4.55%, 6/20/2017 | 648,863 | ||
1,251,018 | ||||
Total Value of Asset Backed Securities (cost $3,212,761) | 3,209,303 | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | ||||
OBLIGATIONS—7.5% | ||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | ||||
500M | 0.5%, 9/28/2016 | 498,782 | ||
1,425M | 0.7%, 9/29/2016 | 1,424,390 | ||
300M | 1.04%, 5/19/2017 | 299,366 | ||
750M | 0.875%, 5/24/2017 | 748,506 | ||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $2,973,312) | 2,971,044 | |||
SUPRANATIONALS—3.3% | ||||
Financials | ||||
800M | European Investment Bank, 4.875%, 1/17/2017 | 872,712 | ||
400M | International Finance Corp., 2.125%, 11/17/2017 | 410,557 | ||
Total Value of Supranationals (cost $1,285,206) | 1,283,269 |
13 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
VARIABLE AND FLOATING RATE NOTES—1.0% | |||||||
Financials | |||||||
$400M | Bank of America Corp., 1.3031%, 3/22/2018 (cost $406,552) (c) | $ 407,773 | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—5.4% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
650M | 0.06%, 12/5/2014 | 649,930 | |||||
500M | 0.065%, 12/24/2014 | 499,924 | |||||
Freddie Mac: | |||||||
400M | 0.08%, 11/3/2014 | 399,971 | |||||
600M | 0.062%, 11/21/2014 | 599,947 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $2,149,772) | 2,149,772 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM CORPORATE NOTES—1.0% | |||||||
400M | Chevron Corp., 0.09%, 11/25/2014 (cost $399,945) (d) | 399,945 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $39,809,647) | 100.1 | % | 39,716,664 | ||||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.1 | ) | (31,844) | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 39,684,820 |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
(b) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis |
(see Note 1G). | |
(c) | Interest rates are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates above are the rates in effect |
at September 30, 2014. | |
(d) | Security exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
14 |
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | $ | — | $ | 17,105,719 | $ | — | $ | 17,105,719 | ||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 7,612,198 | — | 7,612,198 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 4,577,641 | — | 4,577,641 | ||||||||
Asset Backed Securities | — | 3,209,303 | — | 3,209,303 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 2,971,044 | — | 2,971,044 | ||||||||
Supranationals | — | 1,283,269 | — | 1,283,269 | ||||||||
Variable and Floating | ||||||||||||
Rate Notes | — | 407,773 | — | 407,773 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 2,149,772 | — | 2,149,772 | ||||||||
Short-Term Corporate Notes | — | 399,945 | — | 399,945 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | — | $ | 39,716,664 | $ | — | $ | 39,716,664 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for |
corporate bonds, asset backed securities, supranationals and variable and floating rate notes. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended | |
September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the | |
reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 15 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
GOVERNMENT FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Government Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 1.71% for Class A shares, 0.86% for Class B shares, 1.73% for Advisor Class shares and 2.08% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 25.5 cents per share on Class A shares, 17.3 cents per share on Class B shares, 26.7 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 28.5 cents per share on Institutional Class shares.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
The U.S. economy, as measured by gross domestic product (“GDP”), grew slightly faster than 2% during the review period, albeit in an unsteady manner, with quarterly growth ranging from –2.1% to 4.6%. This pace of economic growth was sufficient to reduce the unemployment rate from 7.2% to 5.9%, its lowest level since 2008. While a positive development, the employment picture was somewhat tempered by a continued decline in the labor force participation rate and anemic wage growth. Inflation remained subdued, with consumer prices, excluding the volatile food and energy components, increasing only 1.7%, below the Federal Reserve’s (the “Fed’s”) targeted 2% rate. The Fed remained on course to taper its bond buying program, scheduled to conclude in October, and to raise the federal funds rate in the second half of next year.
Interest rates were mixed during the review period. Short- and intermediate-term interest rates moved slightly higher in anticipation of an eventual tightening of monetary policy by the Fed. In particular, two-year and five-year Treasury note yields increased from 0.32% and 1.38% to 0.57% and 1.76%, respectively. In contrast, the benchmark ten-year Treasury note yield ended the review period lower, moving from 2.61% to 2.49%. After touching two-and-a-half year highs at the end of 2013, ten-year yields moved steadily lower for the next three quarters, confounding consensus expectations for higher interest rates in 2014. The move down in long-term yields reflected a number of factors, including slower than expected global economic growth (particularly in Europe), geopolitical events (Ukraine, Gaza, ISIS), which supported “flight-to-safety” flows into the U.S. bond market, and investors’ belief that this Fed tightening cycle would be more benign than in the past.
The broad bond market returned 4.1%, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Both interest rate risk and credit risk were rewarded during the review period, with longer maturity and lower rated bonds seeing the highest returns. Specifically, high yield bonds gained 7.2% as default rates remained historically low. Investment grade corporate bonds benefited primarily from lower interest rates and, secondarily, from tighter credit spreads, gaining 7.1%. Mortgage-backed bonds, whose returns tend to reflect intermediate-term interest rates, gained 3.7%. While the broad Treasury market returned only 2.7%, 10+ year Treasuries were up 11.3% due to the decline in long-term interest rates. Money market returns continued to be essentially flat, reflecting the Fed’s continuation of very easy monetary policy.
16 |
The agency mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) sector outperformed comparable dated Treasury securities as investor demand for agency MBS far outweighed issuance. The Fed remained a large buyer of agency MBS through its Asset Purchase Program, thus contributing to increased demand. Mortgage lenders remained selective, only preferring to lend to borrowers with pristine credit. This resulted in fewer home owners being able to refinance their mortgages, thus reducing both the negative impact that mortgage refinancing would have had on MBS investors and the supply of MBS.
Within the MBS market, 30-year Ginnie Mae (“GNMA”) mortgages returned 3.7% and 30-year Fannie Mae mortgages returned 4.2%. This outperformance of Fannie Mae mortgages over their GNMA counterparts was due to declining relative issuance. Consequently, investors preferred Fannie Mae securities due to their more favorable supply/demand dynamics. Lower-coupon agency MBS outperformed higher-coupon agency MBS. Investors favored lower-coupon agency MBS because they offered higher yields and were less sensitive to prepayments in the falling interest rate environment.
Fund Overview and Fiscal Year Performance Attribution
The Fund underperformed its benchmark, the Citigroup Government and Mortgage Index, during the period under review. Broadly, the Fund’s shorter effective duration had a negative impact on performance as longer-term interest rates decreased during the fiscal year (interest rates and bond prices are inversely related; when rates decrease, prices rise). In particular, the Fund’s underperformance was mainly driven by an underweight in lower-coupon agency MBS and an overweight in higher-coupon agency MBS, and minimal exposure to Treasury maturities 10 years and longer. Lastly, the Fund’s overweight in GNMA agency MBS also contributed to the Fund’s underperformance.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
17 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GOVERNMENT FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.07% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,012.28 | $5.40 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.71 | $5.42 | |
Class B Shares | 1.90% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,008.29 | $9.57 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.54 | $9.60 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.70% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,013.76 | $3.53 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.56 | $3.55 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.65% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,014.54 | $3.28 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.81 | $3.29 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
18 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GOVERNMENT FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Government Fund (Class A shares) and the Citigroup U.S. Government/Mortgage Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 1.71% | 0.86% | 1.73% | 2.08% |
Five Years | 2.61% | 1.87% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 3.65% | 3.07% | (0.04%) | 0.34% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | (4.16%) | (3.12%) | 1.73% | 2.08% |
Five Years | 1.40% | 1.51% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 3.04% | 3.07% | (0.04%) | 0.34% |
S.E.C. 30-Day Yield*** | 1.68% | 0.98% | 2.19% | 2.21% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Government Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/04 with a theoretical investment in the Citigroup U.S. Government/Mortgage Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged index that is a combination of the Citigroup Government Index and the Citigroup Mortgage Index. The Citigroup U.S. Government Index tracks the performance of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored indices within the Citigroup U.S. Broad Investment Grade Bond Index. The Citigroup Mortgage Index tracks the performance of the mortgage component of the Citigroup U.S. Broad Investment Grade Bond Index, which is comprised of 30- and 15-year GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pass-throughs and FNMA and FHLMC balloon mortgages. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses
19 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (4.28%), 1.29% and 2.89%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 1.57%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (3.23%), 1.40% and 2.92%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 0.86%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 1.62% and (2.95%), respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 2.07%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 1.96% and 0.19%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 2.09%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Citigroup and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
*** The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2014.
20 |
Portfolio of Investments
GOVERNMENT FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | ||||
SECURITIES—70.7% | ||||
Fannie Mae—37.1% | ||||
$ 6,182M | 2.5%, 9/1/2023 – 11/1/2023 | $ 6,323,016 | ||
12,229M | 3%, 8/1/2022 – 7/1/2023 | 12,734,266 | ||
29,055M | 3.5%, 10/1/2025 – 5/1/2044 | 30,173,173 | ||
49,443M | 4%, 2/1/2024 – 10/14/2044 (a) | 52,466,188 | ||
10,738M | 4.5%, 11/1/2040 – 1/1/2042 | 11,720,381 | ||
7,155M | 5%, 8/1/2039 – 4/1/2040 | 7,947,227 | ||
3,463M | 5.5%, 7/1/2033 – 10/1/2039 | 3,894,893 | ||
125,259,144 | ||||
Freddie Mac—5.3% | ||||
746M | 3%, 6/1/2021 | 774,311 | ||
8,629M | 3.5%, 9/1/2032 – 8/1/2044 (a) | 8,861,465 | ||
5,565M | 4%, 11/1/2040 | 5,937,773 | ||
2,099M | 5%, 8/1/2039 | 2,351,333 | ||
17,924,882 | ||||
Government National Mortgage Association I | ||||
Program—28.3% | ||||
6,087M | 4%, 11/15/2025 – 6/15/2042 | 6,546,238 | ||
20,039M | 4.5%, 9/15/2033 – 6/15/2040 | 21,999,496 | ||
23,949M | 5%, 6/15/2033 – 4/15/2040 | 26,710,373 | ||
17,196M | 5.5%, 3/15/2033 – 10/15/2039 | 19,377,137 | ||
14,877M | 6%, 2/15/2032 – 4/15/2040 | 17,089,968 | ||
1,502M | 6.5%, 6/15/2034 – 3/15/2038 | 1,710,494 | ||
1,931M | 7%, 6/15/2023 – 4/15/2034 | 2,135,138 | ||
95,568,844 | ||||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $232,445,585) | 238,752,870 | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | ||||
OBLIGATIONS—9.6% | ||||
Fannie Mae: | ||||
12,800M | 0.875%, 8/28/2017 | 12,719,411 | ||
4,300M | 1.875%, 9/18/2018 | 4,345,614 | ||
3,025M | 2.625%, 9/6/2024 | 2,982,075 | ||
7,000M | Federal Farm Credit Bank, 2.79%, 11/12/2020 | 7,012,572 | ||
5,000M | Freddie Mac, 3.75%, 3/27/2019 | 5,416,435 | ||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $32,515,904) | 32,476,107 |
21 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—5.8% | ||||
U.S. Treasury Notes: | ||||
$ 5,550M | 1.5%, 5/31/2019 | $ 5,492,768 | ||
5,400M | 2.25%, 7/31/2021 | 5,419,197 | ||
8,720M | 2.375%, 8/15/2024 | 8,619,860 | ||
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $19,737,928) | 19,531,825 | |||
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE | ||||
OBLIGATIONS—5.6% | ||||
Fannie Mae—4.4% | ||||
7,048M | 3%, 2/25/2024 | 7,243,176 | ||
6,998M | 4%, 2/25/2025 | 7,552,155 | ||
14,795,331 | ||||
Freddie Mac—1.2% | ||||
4,077M | 3%, 8/15/2039 | 4,170,850 | ||
Total Value of Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (cost $19,317,822) | 18,966,181 | |||
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | ||||
SECURITIES—5.1% | ||||
Fannie Mae—3.6% | ||||
2,911M | 2.27%, 1/1/2023 | 2,825,651 | ||
1,300M | 2.96%, 11/1/2018 | 1,348,416 | ||
2,947M | 3.76%, 4/1/2018 | 3,138,664 | ||
4,500M | 3.84%, 5/1/2018 | 4,809,938 | ||
12,122,669 | ||||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation—1.5% | ||||
5,000M | Multi Family Structured Pass Through 2.13%, 1/25/2019 | 5,041,810 | ||
Total Value of Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $17,574,636) | 17,164,479 | |||
CORPORATE BONDS—1.1% | ||||
Financials | ||||
3,932M | Excalibur One 77B, LLC, 1.492%, 1/1/2025 (cost $3,913,601) | 3,758,393 |
22 |
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | ||||||
OBLIGATIONS—3.0% | ||||||
$10,000M | Freddie Mac, 0.01%, 11/5/2014 (cost $9,999,903) | $ 9,999,903 | ||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $335,505,379) | 100.9 | % | 340,649,758 | |||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.9 | ) | (3,014,314) | |||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 337,635,444 |
(a) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis |
(see Note 1G). |
23 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
September 30, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | $ | — | $ | 238,752,870 | $ | — | $ | 238,752,870 | ||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 32,476,107 | — | 32,476,107 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 19,531,825 | — | 19,531,825 | ||||||||
Collateralized Mortgage | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 18,966,181 | — | 18,966,181 | ||||||||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 17,164,479 | — | 17,164,479 | ||||||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 3,758,393 | — | 3,758,393 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 9,999,903 | — | 9,999,903 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 340,649,758 | $ | — | $ | 340,649,758 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
24 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Investment Grade Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 5.50% for Class A shares, 4.53% for Class B shares, 5.61% for Advisor Class shares and 5.98% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 39.2 cents per share on Class A shares, 32.9 cents on Class B shares, 40.2 cents on Advisor Class shares and 42.8 cents on Institutional Class shares.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
The U.S. economy, as measured by gross domestic product (“GDP”), grew slightly faster than 2% during the review period, albeit in an unsteady manner, with quarterly growth ranging from –2.1% to 4.6%. This pace of economic growth was sufficient to reduce the unemployment rate from 7.2% to 5.9%, its lowest level since 2008. While a positive development, the employment picture was somewhat tempered by a continued decline in the labor force participation rate and anemic wage growth. Inflation remained subdued, with consumer prices, excluding the volatile food and energy components, increasing only 1.7%, below the Federal Reserve’s (the “Fed’s”) targeted 2% rate. The Fed remained on course to taper its bond buying program, scheduled to conclude in October, and to raise the federal funds rate in the second half of next year.
Interest rates were mixed during the review period. Short- and intermediate-term interest rates moved slightly higher in anticipation of an eventual tightening of monetary policy by the Fed. In particular, two-year and five-year Treasury note yields increased from 0.32% and 1.38% to 0.57% and 1.76%, respectively. In contrast, the benchmark ten-year Treasury note yield ended the review period lower, moving from 2.61% to 2.49%. After touching two-and-a-half year highs at the end of 2013, ten-year yields moved steadily lower for the next three quarters, confounding consensus expectations for higher interest rates in 2014. The move down in long-term yields reflected a number of factors, including slower than expected global economic growth (particularly in Europe), geopolitical events (Ukraine, Gaza, ISIS), which supported “flight-to-safety” flows into the U.S. bond market, and investors’ belief that this Fed tightening cycle would be more benign than in the past.
The broad bond market returned 4.1%, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Both interest rate risk and credit risk were rewarded during the review period, with longer maturity and lower rated bonds seeing the highest returns. Specifically, high yield bonds gained 7.2% as default rates remained historically low. Investment grade corporate bonds benefited primarily from lower interest rates and, secondarily, from tighter credit spreads, gaining 7.1%. Mortgage-backed bonds, whose returns tend to reflect intermediate-term interest rates, gained 3.7%. While the broad Treasury market returned only 2.7%, 10+ year Treasuries were up 11.3% due to the decline in long-term interest rates. Money market returns continued to be essentially flat, reflecting the Fed’s continuation of very easy monetary policy.
25 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
The corporate bond market began the review period on a firm note with corporate spreads tightening amongst a backdrop of rising Treasury yields. Very strong technical factors helped support the market, and a wave of new issue supply met an upsurge in demand for investment grade corporate debt. Even as benchmark Treasury yields reversed course and fell during the first half of 2014, positive technicals continued to help corporate bond spreads narrow. Corporate bond spreads began to widen only towards the end of the review period as volatility increased in the market. Lower beta sectors became safe havens for corporate bond investors as riskier assets traded with greater volatility.
The positive returns of the corporate bond market during the review period were predominantly a result of duration and Treasury curve movement. Of note, corporate bonds with maturities greater than 10 years outperformed shorter maturity debt, reflecting the substantial move lower in long-term bond yields (bond prices and yields have an inverse relationship; when prices rise, yields fall).
Fund Overview and Fiscal Year Performance Attribution
The Fund invests in investment grade fixed income securities. Over the course of the review period, the majority of the Fund’s assets were invested in investment grade corporate bonds. The Fund also had as much as 3% of its assets invested in high yield securities.
The Fund underperformed its benchmark, the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Corporate Index, during the review period. The relative performance was predominantly a function of the Fund’s positioning for expected higher interest rates. Specifically, the Fund was negatively impacted by its underweight in corporate bonds with maturities greater than 10 years, which significantly outperformed shorter-dated corporate bonds. This underweight was partially offset by the Fund’s overweight in BBB-rated corporate bonds, which had the highest returns of any rating tier during the review period.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
26 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14-9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.05% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,021.90 | $5.32 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.81 | $5.32 | |
Class B Shares | 1.90% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,017.71 | $9.61 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.54 | $9.60 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.67% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,023.42 | $3.40 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.71 | $3.40 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.64% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,024.71 | $3.25 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.86 | $3.24 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
27 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Investment Grade Fund (Class A shares) and the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 5.50% | 4.53% | 5.61% | 5.98% |
Five Years | 6.11% | 5.30% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 4.61% | 4.00% | 1.95% | 2.30% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | (0.59%) | 0.53% | 5.61% | 5.98% |
Five Years | 4.85% | 4.97% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 3.99% | 4.00% | 1.95% | 2.30% |
S.E.C. 30-Day Yield*** | 1.94% | 1.23% | 2.42% | 2.47% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Investment Grade Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/04 with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index (the “Index”). The Index includes publicly-issued, fixed rate, non-convertible investment grade dollar-denominated, S.E.C.-registered corporate debt having at least one year to maturity and an outstanding par value of at least $250 million. Bonds must be rated investment grade based on a composite of Moody’s and S&P. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares
28 |
and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (0.70%), 4.74% and 3.88%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 1.84%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 0.42%, 4.87% and 3.89%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 1.11%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 5.49% and (0.97%), respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 2.30%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 5.87% and 2.16%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 2.35%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class share are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
*** The S.E.C. 30-day yield shown is for September 2014.
29 |
Portfolio of Investments
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
CORPORATE BONDS—97.8% | ||||
Agriculture—.6% | ||||
$ 2,725M | Cargill, Inc., 6%, 11/27/2017 (a) | $ 3,080,261 | ||
Automotive—1.4% | ||||
2,000M | Daimler Finance NA, LLC, 2.95%, 1/11/2017 (a) | 2,070,984 | ||
5,000M | Johnson Controls, Inc., 5%, 3/30/2020 | 5,530,605 | ||
7,601,589 | ||||
Chemicals—2.7% | ||||
5,000M | CF Industries, Inc., 3.45%, 6/1/2023 | 4,910,540 | ||
4,000M | Dow Chemical Co., 4.25%, 11/15/2020 | 4,273,280 | ||
5,000M | LyondellBasell Industries NV, 6%, 11/15/2021 | 5,838,530 | ||
15,022,350 | ||||
Consumer Durables—.5% | ||||
2,300M | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4.7%, 8/15/2020 | 2,468,965 | ||
Energy—11.2% | ||||
5,000M | Canadian Oil Sands, Ltd., 7.75%, 5/15/2019 (a) | 6,051,885 | ||
5,000M | Continental Resources, Inc., 5%, 9/15/2022 | 5,281,250 | ||
4,800M | DCP Midstream, LLC, 9.75%, 3/15/2019 (a) | 6,152,208 | ||
3,000M | DCP Midstream Operating, LP, 2.5%, 12/1/2017 | 3,063,396 | ||
5,000M | Enbridge Energy Partners, LP, 4.2%, 9/15/2021 | 5,285,280 | ||
5,000M | Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, LP, 3.45%, 2/15/2023 | 4,786,055 | ||
5,000M | Nabors Industries, Inc., 6.15%, 2/15/2018 | 5,647,105 | ||
4,000M | ONEOK Partners, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2022 | 3,907,268 | ||
5,000M | Petrobras International Finance Co., 5.375%, 1/27/2021 | 5,079,100 | ||
5,800M | Spectra Energy Capital, LLC, 6.2%, 4/15/2018 | 6,560,374 | ||
4,000M | Valero Energy Corp., 9.375%, 3/15/2019 | 5,148,640 | ||
4,000M | Weatherford International, Inc., 6.35%, 6/15/2017 | 4,488,204 | ||
61,450,765 | ||||
Financial Services—16.8% | ||||
1,250M | Aflac, Inc., 8.5%, 5/15/2019 | 1,583,611 | ||
American Express Co.: | ||||
4,000M | 7%, 3/19/2018 | 4,660,748 | ||
2,000M | 4.05%, 12/3/2042 | 1,900,162 | ||
American International Group, Inc.: | ||||
1,200M | 8.25%, 8/15/2018 | 1,466,994 | ||
3,100M | 6.4%, 12/15/2020 | 3,692,953 | ||
4,000M | Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 5.3%, 3/15/2020 | 4,536,116 |
30 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Financial Services (continued) | ||||
$ 6,400M | Assured Guaranty US Holding, Inc., 5%, 7/1/2024 | $ 6,474,355 | ||
4,300M | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 3.4%, 1/31/2022 | 4,431,442 | ||
1,000M | BlackRock, Inc., 5%, 12/10/2019 | 1,131,364 | ||
4,000M | CoBank ACB, 7.875%, 4/16/2018 (a) | 4,739,452 | ||
2,400M | Compass Bank, 6.4%, 10/1/2017 | 2,644,752 | ||
ERAC USA Finance, LLC: | ||||
3,750M | 4.5%, 8/16/2021 (a) | 4,066,965 | ||
3,000M | 7%, 10/15/2037 (a) | 3,975,141 | ||
6,200M | Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC, 8.125%, 1/15/2020 | 7,757,614 | ||
General Electric Capital Corp.: | ||||
9,400M | 5.3%, 2/11/2021 | 10,602,899 | ||
6,800M | 6.75%, 3/15/2032 | 8,990,566 | ||
2,700M | Harley-Davidson Financial Services, Inc., 2.4%, 9/15/2019 (a) | 2,702,130 | ||
Harley-Davidson Funding Corp.: | ||||
2,000M | 5.75%, 12/15/2014 (a) | 2,021,296 | ||
1,800M | 6.8%, 6/15/2018 (a) | 2,103,523 | ||
4,000M | Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 4.95%, 5/1/2022 (a) | 4,313,200 | ||
4,550M | Protective Life Corp., 7.375%, 10/15/2019 | 5,570,051 | ||
2,000M | Prudential Financial, Inc., 7.375%, 6/15/2019 | 2,438,216 | ||
91,803,550 | ||||
Financials—19.5% | ||||
Bank of America Corp.: | ||||
3,250M | 5.65%, 5/1/2018 | 3,617,926 | ||
5,925M | 5%, 5/13/2021 | 6,515,811 | ||
4,625M | 5.875%, 2/7/2042 | 5,562,182 | ||
Barclays Bank, PLC: | ||||
2,000M | 5.125%, 1/8/2020 | 2,246,792 | ||
3,800M | 3.75%, 5/15/2024 | 3,783,850 | ||
Citigroup, Inc.: | ||||
4,200M | 6.125%, 11/21/2017 | 4,741,464 | ||
2,000M | 4.5%, 1/14/2022 | 2,147,712 | ||
3,000M | Deutsche Bank AG London, 3.7%, 5/30/2024 | 2,979,951 | ||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: | ||||
2,000M | 5.375%, 3/15/2020 | 2,228,330 | ||
5,900M | 5.75%, 1/24/2022 | 6,715,427 | ||
3,000M | 3.625%, 1/22/2023 | 2,983,332 | ||
5,250M | 6.125%, 2/15/2033 | 6,301,533 | ||
JPMorgan Chase & Co.: | ||||
9,200M | 6%, 1/15/2018 | 10,359,458 | ||
4,000M | 4.5%, 1/24/2022 | 4,292,404 |
31 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Financials (continued) | ||||
Morgan Stanley: | ||||
$4,050M | 5.95%, 12/28/2017 | $ 4,539,426 | ||
5,500M | 6.625%, 4/1/2018 | 6,303,715 | ||
6,000M | 5.5%, 7/28/2021 | 6,767,556 | ||
4,000M | SunTrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 9/11/2017 | 4,495,424 | ||
4,000M | UBS AG, 4.875%, 8/4/2020 | 4,458,492 | ||
4,000M | U.S. Bancorp., 3.6%, 9/11/2024 | 3,961,080 | ||
Wells Fargo & Co.: | ||||
2,900M | 4.6%, 4/1/2021 | 3,180,424 | ||
8,600M | 3.45%, 2/13/2023 | 8,459,820 | ||
106,642,109 | ||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—8.2% | ||||
4,000M | Altria Group, Inc., 9.7%, 11/10/2018 | 5,157,352 | ||
5,000M | Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, 4.625%, 2/1/2044 | 5,085,235 | ||
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc.: | ||||
1,000M | 6.875%, 11/15/2019 | 1,201,260 | ||
4,000M | 5.375%, 1/15/2020 | 4,518,000 | ||
5,225M | Bunge Ltd. Finance Corp., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 6,501,833 | ||
4,200M | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 6.82%, 5/1/2018 | 4,889,434 | ||
4,165M | Ingredion, Inc., 4.625%, 11/1/2020 | 4,467,446 | ||
4,000M | Philip Morris International, Inc., 5.65%, 5/16/2018 | 4,527,544 | ||
SABMiller Holdings, Inc.: | ||||
4,000M | 3.75%, 1/15/2022 (a) | 4,083,588 | ||
4,000M | 4.95%, 1/15/2042 (a) | 4,178,348 | ||
44,610,040 | ||||
Forest Products/Container—1.0% | ||||
5,000M | Rock-Tenn Co., 4.9%, 3/1/2022 | 5,367,960 | ||
Health Care—4.6% | ||||
4,000M | Biogen IDEC, Inc., 6.875%, 3/1/2018 | 4,645,756 | ||
Express Scripts Holding Co.: | ||||
4,050M | 4.75%, 11/15/2021 | 4,429,639 | ||
1,800M | 3.5%, 6/15/2024 | 1,766,079 | ||
4,000M | Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings, 3.75%, 8/23/2022 | 4,052,384 | ||
4,000M | Mylan, Inc., 3.125%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 3,828,000 | ||
4,000M | Novartis Capital Corp., 4.4%, 5/6/2044 | 4,176,948 | ||
1,400M | Novartis Securities Investments, Ltd., 5.125%, 2/10/2019 | 1,573,828 | ||
580M | Roche Holdings, Inc., 6%, 3/1/2019 (a) | 672,826 | ||
25,145,460 |
32 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Information Technology—1.5% | ||||
$4,000M | Harris Corp., 4.4%, 12/15/2020 | $ 4,259,408 | ||
4,000M | Symantec Corp., 3.95%, 6/15/2022 | 4,054,720 | ||
8,314,128 | ||||
Manufacturing—2.9% | ||||
5,000M | CRH America, Inc., 8.125%, 7/15/2018 | 6,041,550 | ||
4,000M | Ingersoll-Rand Global Holdings Co., Ltd., 6.875%, 8/15/2018 | 4,688,760 | ||
4,550M | Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.55%, 10/1/2017 | 5,184,611 | ||
15,914,921 | ||||
Media-Broadcasting—4.2% | ||||
1,800M | ABC, Inc., 8.75%, 8/15/2021 | 2,403,112 | ||
3,950M | British Sky Broadcasting Group, PLC, 9.5%, 11/15/2018 (a) | 5,029,879 | ||
2,000M | CBS Corp., 3.375%, 3/1/2022 | 2,005,988 | ||
4,000M | Comcast Corp., 4.25%, 1/15/2033 | 4,061,400 | ||
3,000M | DirecTV Holdings, LLC, 3.8%, 3/15/2022 | 3,054,033 | ||
2,000M | Sirius XM Radio, Inc., 5.25%, 8/15/2022 (a) | 2,095,000 | ||
4,000M | Time Warner Cable, Inc., 5%, 2/1/2020 | 4,450,228 | ||
23,099,640 | ||||
Media-Diversified—1.1% | ||||
McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc.: | ||||
3,350M | 5.9%, 11/15/2017 | 3,682,374 | ||
2,300M | 6.55%, 11/15/2037 | 2,398,224 | ||
6,080,598 | ||||
Metals/Mining—5.2% | ||||
5,000M | Alcoa, Inc., 6.15%, 8/15/2020 | 5,517,635 | ||
4,000M | ArcelorMittal, 6.125%, 6/1/2018 | 4,250,000 | ||
4,000M | Glencore Finance Canada, Ltd., 4.95%, 11/15/2021 (a) | 4,263,060 | ||
4,200M | Newmont Mining Corp., 5.125%, 10/1/2019 | 4,565,824 | ||
5,000M | Rio Tinto Finance USA, Ltd., 3.75%, 9/20/2021 | 5,194,870 | ||
4,000M | Vale Overseas, Ltd., 5.625%, 9/15/2019 | 4,486,692 | ||
28,278,081 |
33 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—4.7% | ||||
$4,000M | Boston Properties, LP, 5.875%, 10/15/2019 | $ 4,613,188 | ||
4,000M | Digital Realty Trust, LP, 5.25%, 3/15/2021 | 4,347,348 | ||
4,000M | HCP, Inc., 5.375%, 2/1/2021 | 4,469,384 | ||
ProLogis, LP: | ||||
3,000M | 4.5%, 8/15/2017 | 3,215,571 | ||
2,000M | 3.35%, 2/1/2021 | 1,998,586 | ||
2,700M | Simon Property Group, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2024 | 2,675,519 | ||
4,000M | Ventas Realty, LP, 4.75%, 6/1/2021 | 4,360,960 | ||
25,680,556 | ||||
Retail-General Merchandise—2.3% | ||||
6,000M | GAP, Inc., 5.95%, 4/12/2021 | 6,832,926 | ||
2,000M | Home Depot, Inc., 5.875%, 12/16/2036 | 2,470,844 | ||
3,600M | Lowe’s Cos., Inc., 4.25%, 9/15/2044 | 3,522,719 | ||
12,826,489 | ||||
Telecommunications—1.3% | ||||
2,000M | AT&T, Inc., 6.5%, 9/1/2037 | 2,437,798 | ||
4,000M | Verizon Communications, Inc., 5.15%, 9/15/2023 | 4,432,688 | ||
6,870,486 | ||||
Transportation—3.1% | ||||
4,000M | Burlington North Santa Fe, LLC, 5.15%, 9/1/2043 | 4,408,164 | ||
4,000M | Con-way, Inc., 7.25%, 1/15/2018 | 4,606,308 | ||
4,125M | GATX Corp., 4.75%, 6/15/2022 | 4,466,496 | ||
3,000M | Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP, 4.875%, 7/11/2022 (a) | 3,229,167 | ||
16,710,135 | ||||
Utilities—5.0% | ||||
3,000M | E.ON International Finance BV, 5.8%, 4/30/2018 (a) | 3,390,573 | ||
1,900M | Electricite de France SA, 6.5%, 1/26/2019 (a) | 2,229,747 | ||
4,000M | Exelon Generation Co., LLC, 5.2%, 10/1/2019 | 4,440,044 | ||
Great River Energy Co.: | ||||
291M | 5.829%, 7/1/2017 (a) | 313,959 | ||
3,424M | 4.478%, 7/1/2030 (a) | 3,627,762 | ||
4,200M | National Fuel Gas Co., 8.75%, 5/1/2019 | 5,223,809 |
34 |
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Utilities (continued) | ||||||
$ 900M | Northern States Power Co., 4.125%, 5/15/2044 | $ 908,571 | ||||
3,000M | Ohio Power Co., 5.375%, 10/1/2021 | 3,480,840 | ||||
2,881M | Sempra Energy, 9.8%, 2/15/2019 | 3,757,853 | ||||
27,373,158 | ||||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $509,430,726) | 97.8 | % | 534,341,241 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 2.2 | 12,094,871 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 546,436,112 |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
35 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds* | $ | — | $ | 534,341,241 | $ | — | $ | 534,341,241 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for corporate bonds. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
36 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Strategic Income Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 4.55% for Class A shares and 4.82% for Advisor Class shares, including dividends of 27.9 cents per share on Class A shares and 31.5 cents per share on Advisor Class shares. The Fund declared capital gains distributions of 0.4 cents per share on each class of shares.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
The U.S. economy, as measured by gross domestic product (“GDP”), grew slightly faster than 2% during the review period, albeit in an unsteady manner, with quarterly growth ranging from –2.1% to 4.6%. This pace of economic growth was sufficient to reduce the unemployment rate from 7.2% to 5.9%, its lowest level since 2008. While a positive development, the employment picture was somewhat tempered by a continued decline in the labor force participation rate and anemic wage growth. Inflation remained subdued, with consumer prices, excluding the volatile food and energy components, increasing only 1.7%, below the Federal Reserve’s (the “Fed’s”) targeted 2% rate. The Fed remained on course to taper its bond buying program, scheduled to conclude in October, and to raise the federal funds rate in the second half of next year.
Interest rates were mixed during the review period. Short- and intermediate-term interest rates moved slightly higher in anticipation of an eventual tightening of monetary policy by the Fed. In particular, two-year and five-year Treasury note yields increased from 0.32% and 1.38% to 0.57% and 1.76%, respectively. In contrast, the benchmark ten-year Treasury note yield ended the review period lower, moving from 2.61% to 2.49%. After touching two-and-a-half year highs at the end of 2013, ten-year yields moved steadily lower for the next three quarters, confounding consensus expectations for higher interest rates in 2014. The move down in long-term yields reflected a number of factors, including slower than expected global economic growth (particularly in Europe), geopolitical events (Ukraine, Gaza, ISIS), which supported “flight-to-safety” flows into the U.S. bond market, and investors’ belief that this Fed tightening cycle would be more benign than in the past.
The broad bond market returned 4.1%, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Both interest rate risk and credit risk were rewarded during the review period, with longer maturity and lower rated bonds seeing the highest returns. Specifically, high yield bonds gained 7.2% as default rates remained historically low. Investment grade corporate bonds benefited primarily from lower interest rates and, secondarily, from tighter credit spreads, gaining 7.1%. Mortgage-backed bonds, whose returns tend to reflect intermediate-term interest rates, gained 3.7%. While the broad Treasury market returned only 2.7%, 10+ year Treasuries were up 11.3% due to the decline in long-term interest rates.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index returned 19.7%, with dividends reinvested in the Index. Lastly, money market returns continued to be essentially flat, reflecting the Fed’s continuation of very easy monetary policy.
37 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
Fund Overview and Fiscal Year Performance Attribution
The Fund can invest through institutional class shares in a number of First Investors Funds (Underlying Funds). The average allocations to Underlying Funds as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets, the total returns for the review period and the allocations as a percentage of net assets as of the end of the period are displayed in the table below:
Average Allocations, | Allocations, | ||||
Review Period | Total Return | 9/30/14 | |||
Equity Income Fund | 9.0% | 14.88% | 5.3% | ||
Floating Rate Fund | 3.7% | 1.36%* | 4.9% | ||
Fund For Income | 39.8% | 5.59% | 39.3% | ||
Government Fund | 9.3% | 2.08% | 9.8% | ||
International Opportunities | |||||
Bond Fund | 12.6% | 3.19% | 15.1% | ||
Investment Grade Fund | 20.9% | 5.98% | 20.0% | ||
Limited Duration High | |||||
Quality Bond Fund | 1.8% | –0.14%** | 4.9% | ||
Cash | 2.9% | 0.00% | 0.7% |
For the review period, the Fund returned 4.55%, outperforming its benchmark, the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index, which returned 4.12%. The Fund benefited from its allocation to the Equity Income Fund, given the strong performance of the stock market during the review period, and its exposure to credit risk through allocations to the Fund For Income and Investment Grade Fund. Allocations to the Floating Rate Fund and Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund dampened performance as short duration investments underperformed longer duration debt.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
* | Total return since Fund’s commencement of operations on October 21, 2013. |
** | Total return since Fund’s commencement of operations on May 19, 2014. |
38 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/3/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 0.57% | |||
Actual* | $1,000.00 | $1,006.28 | $2.87 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,022.21 | $2.89 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.20% | |||
Actual* | $1,000.00 | $1,008.07 | $1.01 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,024.07 | $1.01 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the inception period). Expenses paid during the period | |
are net of expenses waived and/or assumed or repaid to advisor. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
39 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Strategic Income Bond Fund (Class A shares) and the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | |||
Advisor | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class | |
One Year | 4.55% | 4.82% | |
Since Inception** | 2.41% | 2.65% | |
Advisor | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class | |
One Year | (1.50%) | 4.82% | |
Since Inception** | (1.57%) | 2.65% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Strategic Income Fund (Class A shares) beginning 4/3/13 (commencement of operations) with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index (the “Index”). The Index tracks the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated investment grade debt publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market, including U.S. Treasury, quasi-government, corporate, securitized and collateralized securities. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Advisor Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class
40
A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (2.51%). The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 1.63%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Citigroup and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Class A shares and Advisor Class shares are for the period beginning 4/3/13 (commencement of operations).
41 |
Portfolio of Investments
STRATEGIC INCOME
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||||
MUTUAL FUNDS—99.8% | ||||||
First Investors Equity Funds—5.3% | ||||||
537,395 | Equity Income Fund – Institutional Class Shares | $ 5,390,072 | ||||
First Investors Income Funds—94.5% | ||||||
511,753 | Floating Rate Fund – Institutional Class Shares | 5,045,886 | ||||
15,394,099 | Fund For Income – Institutional Class Shares | 40,024,658 | ||||
930,033 | Government Fund – Institutional Class Shares | 10,137,360 | ||||
1,554,759 | International Opportunities Bond Fund – Institutional Class Shares | 15,361,015 | ||||
2,069,648 | Investment Grade Fund – Institutional Class Shares | 20,572,305 | ||||
512,318 | Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund – Institutional Class Shares | 5,082,198 | ||||
96,223,422 | ||||||
Total Value of Mutual Funds (cost $102,879,139) | 99.8 | % | 101,613,494 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .2 | 249,237 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 101,862,731 |
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
42 |
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Mutual Funds | ||||||||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ | 96,223,422 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 96,223,422 | ||||
First Investors Equity Funds | 5,390,072 | — | — | 5,390,072 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 101,613,494 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 101,613,494 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 43 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors International Opportunities Bond Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 2.84% for Class A shares, 2.81% for Advisor Class shares and 3.19% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 26.8 cents per share on Class A shares, 27.5 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 28.3 cents per share on Institutional Class shares.
The Fund invests in sovereign bonds and currencies of countries in its benchmark, the Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index, as well as some non-Index countries, including those of emerging markets. Corporate bonds of countries in the Index may be purchased opportunistically as well. The Fund’s outperformance relative to the benchmark during the prior 12-month period ended September 30, 2014 can be fully attributed to 1) avoiding the Japanese yen and 2) maintaining a small, heavily underweight exposure to the euro, which together constitute almost 80% of the Index’s currency exposure. Strong absolute performance in the portfolio was the result of significant contribution from excess return and the impact of bond yields falling globally (bond yields and prices have an inverse relationship; when yields fall, prices rise). Bond yields fell due to significant disinflationary forces emanating from Europe and Asia, especially in the second and third quarters of 2014. These factors offered more than enough positive absolute performance to offset the impact of a strong dollar, which drove negative absolute returns in the Index.
The yen recovered from a volatile 2013 to exhibit relative stability throughout much of 2014. Despite the relative calm, however, Japanese economic data soured late in the review period as a result of an increase in the country’s value-added tax (VAT). Japan increased the VAT as part of a long-term plan to reduce the country’s substantial sovereign debt load. Investors priced in a high probability of fresh stimulus from the Bank of Japan to counter the economic slump resulting from the VAT increase. Additional stimulus would translate into a greater supply of yen available, which tends to hurt the value of a currency. Indeed, the yen fell more than 10% against the dollar during the prior 12 months through September 30, 2014.
The euro performed well until May, supported by strong portfolio flows from outside the euro zone, especially from Asia. The single currency then began to suffer upon precipitously falling inflation expectations and weak economic data — much the result of an overly expensive currency and passive tightening in the European Central Bank’s (“ECB”) balance sheet from banks repaying Longer-Term Refinancing Operations loans. Although realized inflation increased by less than 1% on an annualized basis during the entire 12-month review period, ECB President Mario
44 |
Draghi was slow to action, waiting until June to announce negative interest rates and until September to announce an unsterilized purchase program of asset-backed securities (ABS). By September, economic activity reached contractionary levels across the euro zone and inflation “break-evens” — market-based expectations of future inflation — fell to levels that historically were met with quantitative easing of more significant size than the ABS purchase program announced in September. Any modest gains the euro made through mid-2014 were wiped out in the third quarter of 2014. For the 12-month period ended September 30, 2014, the euro fell almost 7% against the U.S. dollar.
Other notable performance impacts on the Fund included two long exposures to emerging markets currencies, the Indian rupee and Chilean peso. Most emerging markets currencies outside of Europe rallied for much of 2014 after being hurt badly in the “taper tantrum” of 2013, when Federal Reserve (“Fed”) Chairman Ben Bernanke warned of the end of the most recent quantitative easing program. Low market volatility and falling high-quality long-term bond yields in 2014 supported investor demand for high-yielding emerging markets bonds and currencies, despite a backdrop of falling growth in emerging markets. The Indian rupee outperformed the Index’s currency return on account of the positive macro-financial backdrop as well as increasing confidence in the country’s central bank after Rajan Raghuram, previously chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, targeted inflation as his paramount concern at the Reserve Bank of India. Exposure to the Chilean peso offset positive relative performance elsewhere, as the demand fell for copper — the country’s most significant export — copper investment projects floundered, and the central bank cut interest rates to stimulate the economy. Outside of currency impacts, the Fund’s bond positioning produced a neutral impact on relative performance during the period under review.
Market Commentary and Outlook
The dollar made one of its strongest moves in 40 years in the third quarter of 2014 on better U.S. economic momentum, which has pushed the Fed closer to a tightening cycle. We continue to anticipate that the U.S. will lead better-than-expected growth across developed markets. During the period under review, however, the rest of the world struggled to recapture the old high-growth model and remains stuck in neutral in terms of reflation. The disparity of country growth rates poses many types of challenges. Europe and Japan would like a lower currency to jump-start inflation while many of the emerging countries are witnessing too much inflation because of the feedback cycle related to currency depreciation. Absent further policy paralysis, we believe the European and Japanese economies should firm up moving into 2015. Despite better developed market growth, we expect long-term safe-haven rates will remain capped as a result of the still formidable debt overhang, a benign global
45 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
inflation environment, institutional equity de-risking, a low terminal level expected for policy rates, weak credit growth, and entrenched concerns of global economic fragility. With a “whiff” of deflation in the air, we believe bond positions in the smaller countries should prove valuable once investors come to the view that global growth is bottoming and the move to stabilization/growth has a chance of enduring. Therefore, we continue to believe that emerging markets sovereigns and currencies offer attractive sources of yield despite a challenging end to the period in September 2014.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
46 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.30% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,001.39 | $6.52 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.55 | $6.58 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.03% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,002.81 | $5.17 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.91 | $5.22 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.91% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,003.22 | $4.57 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.51 | $4.61 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
47 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Opportunities Bond Fund (Class A shares) and the Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index (Unhedged).
Average Annual Total Returns* | |||
Advisor | Institutional | ||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class | Class |
One Year | 2.84% | 2.81% | 3.19% |
Since Inception** | 2.10% | 0.33% | 0.57% |
Advisor | Institutional | ||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class | Class |
One Year | (3.07%) | 2.81% | 3.19% |
Since Inception** | (0.71%) | 0.33% | 0.57% |
S.E.C. 30-Day Yield*** | 1.71% | 2.30% | 2.41% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Opportunities Bond Fund (Class A shares) beginning 8/20/12 (commencement of operations) with a theoretical investment in the Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index (Unhedged) (the “Index”). The Index encompasses an all-inclusive universe of institutionally traded bonds, including all fixed-rate bonds with remaining maturities of one year or longer with amounts outstanding of at least the equivalent of $25 million. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
48 |
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been (3.18%) and (4.92%), respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 1.60%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (2.47%). Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Citigroup and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Class A shares are for the period beginning 8/17/12 (commencement of operations). The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
*** The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2014.
49 |
Portfolio of Investments
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
SOVEREIGN BONDS—62.3% | ||||
Mexico—14.0% | ||||
United Mexican States: | ||||
673M MXN | 8.5%, 5/31/2029 | $ 5,917,923 | ||
568M MXN | 8.5%, 11/18/2038 | 5,016,206 | ||
882M MXN | 7.75%, 11/13/2042 | 7,214,123 | ||
18,148,252 | ||||
United Kingdom—9.7% | ||||
7,695M GBP | United Kingdom Gilt, 2.75%, 1/22/2015 | 12,565,298 | ||
Italy—9.6% | ||||
7,910M EUR | Italy Buoni Poliennali Del Tesoro, 5%, 8/1/2039 | 12,484,252 | ||
Portugal—5.8% | ||||
Obrigacoes Do Tesouro: | ||||
2,780M EUR | 4.95%, 10/25/2023 | 4,043,451 | ||
2,750M EUR | 4.1%, 4/15/2037 | 3,522,950 | ||
7,566,401 | ||||
South Korea—4.4% | ||||
Republic of Korea: | ||||
4,319,500M KRW | 5.75%, 9/10/2018 | 4,596,828 | ||
1,170,500M KRW | 3.375%, 9/10/2023 | 1,156,719 | ||
5,753,547 | ||||
Brazil—3.8% | ||||
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional: | ||||
1M BRL | 9.71%, 1/1/2021 | 190,415 | ||
13M BRL | 9.71%, 1/1/2023 | 4,797,705 | ||
4,988,120 | ||||
New Zealand—3.7% | ||||
New Zealand Government Bonds: | ||||
2,390M NZD | 5%, 3/15/2019 | 1,940,931 | ||
3,270M NZD | 5.5%, 4/15/2023 | 2,796,959 | ||
4,737,890 |
50 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Malaysia—3.5% | ||||
Federation of Malaysia: | ||||
2,950M MYR | 4.048%, 9/30/2021 | $ 912,400 | ||
12,310M MYR | 3.48%, 3/15/2023 | 3,648,361 | ||
4,560,761 | ||||
South Africa—3.3% | ||||
Republic of South Africa: | ||||
16,065M ZAR | 6.75%, 3/31/2021 | 1,341,103 | ||
45,000M ZAR | 6.5%, 2/28/2041 | 2,999,973 | ||
4,341,076 | ||||
Poland—2.5% | ||||
10,100M PLN | Republic of Poland, 4%, 10/25/2023 | 3,300,231 | ||
Hungary—2.0% | ||||
Hungary Government Bond: | ||||
535,000M HUF | 5.5%, 2/12/2016 | 2,290,622 | ||
69,000M HUF | 7.5%, 11/12/2020 | 334,425 | ||
2,625,047 | ||||
Total Value of Sovereign bonds (cost $83,375,610) | 81,070,875 | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—22.0% | ||||
United States | ||||
U.S. Treasury Notes: | ||||
14,365M USD | 0.06%, 1/31/2016 (a) | 14,368,103 | ||
14,245M USD | 0.085%, 7/31/2016 (a) | 14,253,333 | ||
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $28,613,730) | 28,621,436 | |||
GOVERNMENT REGIONAL AGENCY—8.2% | ||||
Australia—7.4% | ||||
3,825M AUD | New South Wales Treasury Corp., 5%, 8/20/2024 | 3,663,049 | ||
Queensland Treasury Corp.: | ||||
4,005M AUD | 6.25%, 2/21/2020 | 3,996,957 | ||
1,940M AUD | 6%, 7/21/2022 | 1,955,599 | ||
9,615,605 |
51 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
South Korea—.8% | ||||
1,010M USD | Export-Import Bank of Korea, 0.8581%, 8/14/2017 (a)(b) | $ 1,010,011 | ||
Total Value of Government Regional Agency (cost $11,039,238) | 10,625,616 | |||
CORPORATE BONDS—1.2% | ||||
Australia—.9% | ||||
1,160M USD | Macquarie Group, Ltd., 1.2371%, 1/31/2017 (a)(b) | 1,173,766 | ||
New Zealand—.3% | ||||
470M USD | ANZ New Zealand International, Ltd. of London, | |||
0.7551%, 4/27/2017 (a)(b) | 471,252 | |||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $1,630,000) | 1,645,018 | |||
GOVERNMENT SOVEREIGN AGENCY—1.0% | ||||
Sweden | ||||
Swedish Export Credit: | ||||
420M USD | 0.4146%, 6/12/2017 (a) | 420,871 | ||
875M USD | 0.6081%, 11/9/2017 (a) | 883,881 | ||
Total Value of Government Sovereign Agency (cost $1,303,089) | 1,304,752 | |||
SUPRANATIONALS—.8% | ||||
Luxembourg | ||||
1,015M USD | European Investment Bank, 1.125%, 9/15/2017 | |||
(cost $1,012,329) | 1,014,240 |
52 |
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
GOVERNMENT GUARANTEED | ||||||
PROGRAM—.8% | ||||||
Germany | ||||||
1,000M USD | Erste Abwicklungsanstalt, 0.4331%, 6/7/2016 | |||||
(cost $1,000,891) (a)(c) | $ 1,002,848 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $127,974,887) | 96.3 | % | 125,284,785 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 3.7 | 4,778,331 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 130,063,116 |
(a) | Interest rates are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates above are the rates in effect |
at September 30, 2014. | |
(b) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
(c) | Security exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
AUD | Australian Dollar |
BRL | Brazilian Real |
CLP | Chilean Peso |
EUR | Euro |
GBP | British Pound |
HUF | Hungarian Forint |
IDR | Indonesian Rupiah |
INR | Indian Rupee |
KRW | South Korean Won |
MXN | Mexican Peso |
MYR | Malaysian Ringgit |
NZD | New Zealand Dollar |
PLN | Polish Zloty |
USD | United States Dollar |
ZAR | South African Rand |
53 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
September 30, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Sovereign Bonds | ||||||||||||
Mexico | $ | — | $ | 18,148,252 | $ | — | $ | 18,148,252 | ||||
United Kingdom | — | 12,565,298 | — | 12,565,298 | ||||||||
Italy | — | 12,484,252 | — | 12,484,252 | ||||||||
Portugal | — | 7,566,401 | — | 7,566,401 | ||||||||
South Korea | — | 5,753,547 | — | 5,753,547 | ||||||||
Brazil | — | 4,988,120 | — | 4,988,120 | ||||||||
New Zealand | — | 4,737,890 | — | 4,737,890 | ||||||||
Malaysia | — | 4,560,761 | — | 4,560,761 | ||||||||
South Africa | — | 4,341,076 | — | 4,341,076 | ||||||||
Poland | — | 3,300,231 | — | 3,300,231 | ||||||||
Hungary | — | 2,625,047 | — | 2,625,047 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | ||||||||||||
United States | — | 28,621,436 | — | 28,621,436 | ||||||||
Government Regional Agency | ||||||||||||
Australia | — | 9,615,605 | — | 9,615,605 | ||||||||
South Korea | — | 1,010,011 | — | 1,010,011 | ||||||||
Corporate Notes | ||||||||||||
Australia | — | 1,173,766 | — | 1,173,766 | ||||||||
New Zealand | — | 471,252 | — | 471,252 |
54 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Government Sovereign Agency | ||||||||||||
Sweden | $ | — | $ | 1,304,752 | $ | — | $ | 1,304,752 | ||||
Supranational | ||||||||||||
Luxembourg | — | 1,014,240 | — | 1,014,240 | ||||||||
Government Guaranteed Program | ||||||||||||
Germany | — | 1,002,848 | — | 1,002,848 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 125,284,785 | $ | — | $ | 125,284,785 | ||||
Other Financial Instruments* | $ | — | $ | 181,397 | $ | — | $ | 181,397 |
* | Other financial instruments are foreign exchange contracts and are considered derivative instruments, |
which are valued at the net unrealized appreciation on the instrument. |
During the year ended September 30, 2014, there were no transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments that had a material impact to the Fund. This does not include transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments due to the Fund utilizing international fair value pricing during the period (see Note 1A). Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 55 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
FLOATING RATE FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Floating Rate Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.1 During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 1.12% for Class A shares, 1.43% for Advisor Class shares and 1.36% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 23.2 cents per share on Class A shares, 26.3 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 27.6 cents per share on Institutional Class shares.
The senior floating rate loan market produced a positive, interest-based return over the period. Companies in the senior loan market remained fundamentally healthy and attractively creditworthy. As a result, default rates in the loan market remained historically low, below 2% for the year.
By contrast, loan market technical conditions were more mixed over the course of the fiscal year. This was due to variance in capital flows into and out of the market. Record-setting inflows into senior loans on the part of retail investors at the beginning of the period began to reverse in April 2014.
During the review period, investors recalibrated their thinking regarding Federal Reserve (“Fed”) monetary policy, becoming more convinced that the Fed would not raise short-term interest rates as soon and by as much as had previously been predicted. Floating rate loans are distinguished from fixed-rate bonds—both governmental and corporate—because their coupons re-set, typically quarterly, in line with the changes in the interest rate environment. Thus, loans tend to perform well when investors seek protection from rising rates that would likely erode the principal of fixed-rate instruments. The potential negative impact due to retail investor outflows was stemmed by inflows from institutional investors buying structured loan products. These structures, or “packages”, of loans sought out the market’s highest-yielding and lowest-rated loans. While this dynamic modestly supported loan prices overall, it also led to a wide performance disparity between the higher-rated loans the Fund focuses on and more speculative loans, which benefited from institutional investors’ search for yield and outperformed higher quality loans.
In total, the loan market saw flat returns or gains in every month of the period except the last one. In September 2014, investors required discounts on loan prices as a great number of new loans came to market, expanding supply too quickly. This resulted in a price decline that we think will prove quite temporary given the market’s fundamental attractiveness.
In this modestly optimistic environment, the Fund delivered gains, but underperformed its benchmark both net and gross of fees. Most notably, the portfolio underperformed
56 |
during its first three months of existence when the market enjoyed strong gains, a time when the portfolio held a large percentage in cash. As the Fund put money to work in a rising market, the cash portion of the portfolio did not earn returns. The second fiscal quarter revealed much more even performance between the Fund and the benchmark as the Fund became fully invested. At this point, the Fund began to increase its dividend rate in line with the growing collection of interest income from investments. Both the third and fourth fiscal quarters saw performance just slightly below benchmark on a gross basis. In both quarters, this largely reflected the portfolio’s underweighting of the index’s lower-rated credits. Lower-rated credits are prone to have more volatile return patterns and higher default rates over time. Similarly, the small allocation to high yield bonds in the portfolio included bonds we believed would be price stable due to their high creditworthiness and low sensitivity to changing interest rates. These bonds were added to the portfolio specifically to enhance settlement speed. They were not added to increase risk.
In short, the Fund has been constructed to target long-term consistency of returns by controlling risk. This approach cannot protect a portfolio from all short-term declines or capture all short-term gains, especially those driven by technical market factors. Over the long-term, however, the Fund’s portfolio, which seeks to capture the attractive yield offered by senior loans while avoiding defaults, should deliver investors competitive results. These results should be even more attractive relative to other fixed income instruments in a rising rate environment.
Over the review period, interest rates dropped to lower levels than many in the market, including us, may have predicted as the Fund launched. We think that in 2015, as in 2014, risk is poised to be more concentrated in the macroeconomic arena than in corporate credit. It remains to be seen whether the U.S. can maintain growth against the backdrop of persistent economic lethargy in Europe and Japan. All eyes are likely to remain on the Fed and its approach to future increases in short-term interest rates. In addition, we will be watching for any negative impact on U.S. companies caused by a strengthening U.S. dollar as the reserve currency of choice, particularly as other governments compete to create inflation by devaluing their currencies. 2015’s senior loan default outlook remains benign, particularly for the better-rated companies in which the Fund tends to be concentrated. After a year in which the market has favored riskier issues and has been largely confident that interest rates would not rise, investors are working hard to handicap if and when an improving economy could lead to interest rate increases. Anticipation of such increases should be a boost to the senior loan market. Until that time, we believe that a focus on quality and market discipline should continue to turn any upcoming episodes of volatility into short-term buying opportunities that can benefit portfolio investors over the longer term.
57 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
1 The Fund’s performance and the performance of its benchmark index are since October 21, 2013, the date the Fund commenced operations. |
58 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
FLOATING RATE FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.10% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.05 | $5.52 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.55 | $5.57 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.90% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,001.54 | $4.52 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.56 | $4.56 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.70% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,001.45 | $3.51 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.56 | $3.55 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total market value of investments.
59 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
FLOATING RATE FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Floating Rate Fund (Class A shares) and the J.P. Morgan BB/B Leveraged Loan Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | |||
Advisor | Institutional | ||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class | Class |
Since Inception** | 1.12% | 1.43% | 1.36% |
Advisor | Institutional | ||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class | Class |
Since Inception** | (4.69%) | 1.43% | 1.36% |
S.E.C. 30-Day Yield*** | 2.52% | 2.88% | 3.08% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Floating Rate Fund (Class A shares) beginning 10/21/13 (commencement of operations) with a theoretical investment in the J.P. Morgan BB/B Leveraged Loan Index (the “Index”). The Index is a subset of the J.P. Morgan Leveraged Loan Index, which is designed to represent the investable universe of the U.S. dollar-denominated leveraged loan market. The Index includes U.S. dollar-denominated institutional term loans and fully funded delayed draw term loans which have high yield ratings. However, the most aggressively rated loans and non-rated loans are excluded. Loans can be rated as high as Baa1 and as low as BB3 by Moody’s and also as high as BBB+ and as low as B– by Standard & Poor’s. A loan with the highest allowable rating from each agency will only be included if the company’s overall rating is below investment grade. Loans must be issued by companies domiciled in a developed market, and defaulted loans may remain in the Index only if they remain current on loan obligation payments throughout the default process. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the
60 |
graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (5.12%) and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 2.11%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 1.38% and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 2.85%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 1.01% and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 2.83%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from J.P. Morgan and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the period beginning 10/21/13 (commencement of operations).
*** The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2014.
61 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
LOAN PARTICIPATIONS†—86.8% | ||||
Aerospace/Defense—1.1% | ||||
$ 993M | TransDigm, Inc., 3.75%, 2/28/2020 | $ 979,021 | ||
Automotive—4.8% | ||||
992M | ASP HHI Acquisition Co., Inc, 5%, 10/5/2018 | 992,469 | ||
1,055M | Chrysler Group, LLC, 3.5%, 5/24/2017 | 1,049,910 | ||
1,047M | CS Intermediate Holdco 2, LLC, 4%, 4/4/2021 | 1,034,937 | ||
400M | Doosan Infrascore International, Inc., 4.5%, 5/28/2021 | 400,000 | ||
900M | Key Safety Systems, Inc., 4.75%, 8/29/2021 (a) | 899,624 | ||
4,376,940 | ||||
Building Materials—.9% | ||||
793M | USIC Holdings, Inc., 4%, 7/10/2020 | 782,817 | ||
Chemicals—4.2% | ||||
309M | Ailnex Luxembourg & Cy SCA, Inc., 4.5%, 10/3/2019 | 309,785 | ||
160M | Ailnex USA, Inc., 4.5%, 10/3/2019 | 160,147 | ||
760M | Axalta Coating Systems Dutch Holdings BBV, 3.75%, 2/1/2020 | 749,146 | ||
793M | Cyanco Intermediate Corp., 5.5%, 5/1/2020 | 792,233 | ||
1,000M | Emerald Performance Materials LLC, 4.5%, 7/30/2021 | 998,125 | ||
800M | Solenis International, LP, 4.25%, 7/31/2021 | 790,000 | ||
3,799,436 | ||||
Energy—11.1% | ||||
594M | Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., 3.5%, 5/22/2020 | 535,103 | ||
796M | Drillships Financing Holding, Inc., 6%, 3/31/2021 | 764,888 | ||
Fieldwood Energy, LLC: | ||||
248M | 3.875%, 9/28/2018 | 245,601 | ||
757M | 8.375%, 9/30/2020 | 766,226 | ||
1,194M | Floatel International, Ltd., 6%, 6/27/2020 | 1,173,105 | ||
925M | Jonah Energy, LLC, 7.5%, 5/12/2021 | 918,062 | ||
723M | McDermott Finance, LLC, 5.25%, 4/16/2019 | 723,639 | ||
896M | Murray Energy Corp., 5.25%, 12/5/2019 | 899,045 | ||
643M | Offshore Group Investment, Ltd. , 5.75%, 3/28/2019 | 619,740 | ||
842M | Pacific Drilling SA, 4.5%, 6/3/2018 | 817,539 | ||
1,000M | Samson Investment Co., 5%, 9/25/2018 | 970,626 | ||
894M | Seadrill Operating, LP, 4%, 2/21/2021 | 852,805 | ||
748M | Seventy Seven Operating, LLC, 3.75%, 6/25/2021 | 743,917 | ||
10,030,296 |
62 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Financial Services—3.8% | ||||
$678M | Delos Finance Sarl, 3.5%, 3/6/2021 | $ 671,983 | ||
992M | HUB International, Ltd., 4.25%, 10/2/2020 | 981,599 | ||
794M | Ocwen Loan Servicing Corp., 5%, 2/15/2018 | 784,030 | ||
993M | Sheridan Investment Partners II, LP, 4.25%, 12/16/2020 | 978,233 | ||
3,415,845 | ||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—2.3% | ||||
693M | H.J. Heinz Co., 3.5%, 6/5/2020 | 687,135 | ||
941M | JBS USA, LLC, 3.75%, 5/25/2018 | 940,618 | ||
495M | Pinnacle Foods Finance, LLC, 3.25%, 4/29/2020 | 486,067 | ||
2,113,820 | ||||
Food/Drug—4.3% | ||||
750M | New Albertson’s, Inc., 4.75%, 6/27/2021 | 740,625 | ||
900M | Rite Aid Corp., 4.875%, 6/21/2021 | 901,501 | ||
771M | Sprouts Farmers Market Holdings, LLC, 4%, 4/23/2020 | 768,879 | ||
825M | Stater Brothers Markets, Inc., 4.75%, 5/12/2021 | 821,906 | ||
669M | Supervalu, Inc., 4.5%, 3/21/2019 | 661,144 | ||
3,894,055 | ||||
Forest Products/Container—1.3% | ||||
299M | Ardagh Holdings USA, Inc., 4%, 12/17/2019 | 295,142 | ||
595M | Exopack Holdings SA, 5.25%, 5/8/2019 | 596,419 | ||
300M | Exopack, LLC, 5.25%, 5/8/2019 | 300,844 | ||
1,192,405 | ||||
Gaming/Leisure—6.8% | ||||
773M | 24 Hour Fitness Worldwide, Inc., 4.75%, 5/28/2021 | 770,163 | ||
594M | AMC Entertainment, Inc., 3.5%, 4/30/2020 | 588,324 | ||
709M | Hilton Worldwide Finance, LLC, 3.5%, 10/26/2020 | 699,728 | ||
495M | Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., 3.5%, 8/17/2020 | 491,288 | ||
454M | Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 3.75%, 8/13/2020 | 449,749 | ||
900M | Scientific Games International, Inc., 6%, 9/17/2021 (a) | 882,000 | ||
484M | SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc., 3%, 5/14/2020 | 457,873 | ||
892M | Seminole Hard Rock Entertainment, Inc., 3.5%, 5/14/2020 | 875,747 | ||
992M | Zuffa, LLC, 3.75%, 2/25/2020 | 983,497 | ||
6,198,369 |
63 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Health Care—6.7% | ||||
$ 995M | Accellent, Inc, 4.5%, 3/12/2021 | $ 981,319 | ||
558M | Biomet, Inc., 3.6545%, 7/25/2017 | 555,353 | ||
404M | Community Health Systems, Inc., 4.25%, 1/27/2021 | 403,537 | ||
746M | Endo Luxembourg Finance Co. Sarl, 3.25%, 3/1/2021 | 742,169 | ||
269M | Grifols Worldwide Operations USA, Inc., 3.154%, 2/27/2021 | 265,544 | ||
317M | Medpace Holdings, Inc., 4.75%, 4/1/2021 | 317,014 | ||
643M | MPH Acquisition Holdings, LLC, 4%, 3/31/2021 | 634,138 | ||
650M | NBTY, Inc., 3.5%, 10/1/2017 | 642,038 | ||
460M | Onex Carestream Finance, LP, 5%, 6/7/2019 | 459,965 | ||
481M | Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., 4.25%, 1/2/2020 | 481,814 | ||
573M | Select Medical Corp., 3.75%, 6/1/2018 | 570,161 | ||
6,053,052 | ||||
Information Technology—6.1% | ||||
509M | Activision Blizzard, Inc., 3.25%, 10/12/2020 | 508,046 | ||
596M | Applied Systems, Inc., 4.25%, 1/25/2021 | 591,480 | ||
331M | ARRIS Enterprises, Inc., 3.25%, 4/17/2020 | 327,237 | ||
798M | Avago Technologies Cayman, Ltd., 3.75%, 5/6/2021 | 791,267 | ||
766M | BMC Software Finance, Inc., 5%, 9/10/2020 | 756,693 | ||
343M | DealerTrack Technologies, Inc., 3.5%, 2/28/2021 | 341,691 | ||
596M | Dell International, LLC, 4.5%, 4/29/2020 | 591,629 | ||
730M | Infor (US), Inc., 3.75%, 6/3/2020 | 715,862 | ||
503M | Kronos, Inc., 4.5%, 10/30/2019 | 501,322 | ||
450M | Zebra Technologies Corp., 4.75%, 9/30/2021 (a) | 450,000 | ||
5,575,227 | ||||
Manufacturing—5.3% | ||||
893M | Brand Energy & Infrastructure Services, Inc., 4.75%, 11/26/2020 | 892,831 | ||
894M | Gardner Denver, Inc., 4.25%, 7/30/2020 | 880,373 | ||
1,000M | Gates Global, Inc., 4.25%, 7/5/2021 | 987,500 | ||
996M | Husky Injection Molding System, 4.25%, 6/30/2021 | 985,613 | ||
1,040M | Mirror BidCo Corp., 4.25%, 12/28/2019 | 1,032,978 | ||
4,779,295 |
64 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Media-Cable TV—2.3% | ||||
$ 998M | Gray Television, Inc., 3.75%, 6/13/2021 | $ 990,226 | ||
499M | Numericable US, LLC, 4.5%, 5/21/2020 | 495,841 | ||
630M | Raycom TV Broadcasting, LLC, 3.75%, 8/4/2021 | 632,363 | ||
2,118,430 | ||||
Media-Diversified—1.0% | ||||
899M | Tribune Co., 4%, 12/27/2020 | 890,240 | ||
Metals/Mining—5.7% | ||||
1,169M | Arch Coal, Inc., 6.25%, 5/16/2018 | 1,068,620 | ||
594M | FMG Resources (August 2006) Property, Ltd., 3.75%, 6/30/2019 | 583,110 | ||
693M | McJunkin Red Man Corp., 5.5171%, 11/8/2019 | 693,577 | ||
495M | Novelis, Inc., 3.75%, 3/10/2017 | 490,599 | ||
Oxbow Carbon, LLC: | ||||
237M | 4.25%, 7/19/2019 | 236,847 | ||
250M | 8%, 1/19/2020 | 252,969 | ||
891M | Peabody Energy Corp., 4.25%, 9/24/2020 | 868,911 | ||
943M | TMS International Corp., 4.5%, 10/16/2020 | 943,465 | ||
5,138,098 | ||||
Retail-General Merchandise—11.1% | ||||
594M | Academy, Ltd., 4.5%, 8/3/2018 | 591,447 | ||
598M | General Nutrition Centers, Inc., 3.25%, 3/4/2019 | 588,384 | ||
1,000M | Hertz Corp., 3.75%, 3/11/2018 (a) | 990,833 | ||
1,122M | J. Crew Group, Inc., 4%, 3/5/2021 | 1,075,547 | ||
765M | Landry’s, Inc., 4%, 4/24/2018 | 760,295 | ||
980M | Lands’ End, Inc., 4.25%, 4/4/2021 | 972,112 | ||
489M | Libbey Glass, Inc., 3.75%, 4/9/2021 | 484,091 | ||
1,000M | Men’s Wearhouse, Inc., 4.5%, 6/18/2021 | 998,333 | ||
1,000M | Michaels Stores, Inc., 4%, 1/28/2020 | 991,042 | ||
893M | Neiman Marcus, Inc., 4.25%, 10/25/2020 | 879,986 | ||
644M | Party City Holdings, Inc., 4%, 7/27/2019 | 633,043 | ||
594M | Pilot Travel Centers, LLC, 3.75%, 3/30/2018 | 594,190 | ||
495M | Wendy’s International, Inc., 3.25%, 5/15/2019 | 492,759 | ||
10,052,062 |
65 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Services—2.7% | ||||
$ 588M | Allied Security Holdings, LLC, 4.25%, 2/12/2021 | $ 583,165 | ||
987M | Brickman Group, Ltd., LLC, 4%, 12/18/2020 (a) | 970,650 | ||
373M | Doosan Infrascore International, Inc., 4.5%, 5/28/2021 | 373,062 | ||
495M | Monitronics International, Inc., 4.25%, 3/23/2018 | 490,219 | ||
2,417,096 | ||||
Telecommunications—1.2% | ||||
1,095M | XO Communications, Inc., 4.25%, 3/20/2021 | 1,081,311 | ||
Transportation—1.4% | ||||
334M | Drillships Ocean Ventures, Inc., 5.5%, 7/25/2021 | 322,623 | ||
998M | OSG Bulk Ships, Inc., 5.25%, 8/5/2019 | 998,123 | ||
1,320,746 | ||||
Utilities—2.0% | ||||
975M | ExGen Texas Power, LLC, 5.75%, 9/18/2021 (a) | 976,219 | ||
864M | Southcross Energy Partners, LP, 5.25%, 8/4/2021 | 867,074 | ||
1,843,293 | ||||
Wireless Communications—.7% | ||||
600M | Intelsat Jackson Holdings SA, 3.75%, 6/30/2019 | 594,125 | ||
Total Value of Loan Participations (cost $79,475,747) | 78,645,979 | |||
CORPORATE BONDS—6.3% | ||||
Automotive—.6% | ||||
500M | Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 8.25%, 8/15/2020 | 537,500 | ||
Consumer Non-Durables—1.2% | ||||
500M | Hanesbrands, Inc., 6.375%, 12/15/2020 | 528,500 | ||
500M | Reynolds Group Issuer, Inc., 7.125%, 4/15/2019 | 519,375 | ||
1,047,875 | ||||
Energy—.5% | ||||
450M | Linn Energy, LLC, 8.625%, 4/15/2020 | 467,438 | ||
Gaming/Leisure—.3% | ||||
250M | National CineMedia, LLC, 7.875%, 7/15/2021 | 271,250 |
66 |
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Health Care—1.1% | ||||||
$ 325M | Biomet, Inc., 6.5%, 8/1/2020 | $ 345,312 | ||||
Community Health Systems, Inc.: | ||||||
250M | 5.125%, 8/15/2018 | 257,500 | ||||
75M | 8%, 11/15/2019 | 80,265 | ||||
300M | HCA, Inc., 7.25%, 9/15/2020 | 315,750 | ||||
998,827 | ||||||
Media-Cable TV—.6% | ||||||
475M | CCO Holdings, LLC, 8.125%, 4/30/2020 | 502,906 | ||||
Metals/Mining—.3% | ||||||
300M | FMG Resources (August 2006) Property, Ltd., 6%, 4/1/2017 (b) | 303,187 | ||||
Retail-General Merchandise—.3% | ||||||
300M | Sally Holdings, LLC, 6.875%, 11/15/2019 | 319,500 | ||||
Services—.2% | ||||||
100M | FTI Consulting, Inc., 6.75%, 10/1/2020 | 104,375 | ||||
75M | Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., 7%, 9/1/2020 (b) | 80,063 | ||||
184,438 | ||||||
Telecommunications—.9% | ||||||
250M | PAETEC Holding Corp., 9.875%, 12/1/2018 | 265,250 | ||||
225M | Wind Acquisition Finance SA, 4.75%, 7/15/2020 (b) | 216,563 | ||||
300M | Windstream Corp., 7.75%, 10/15/2020 | 317,250 | ||||
799,063 | ||||||
Wireless Communications—.3% | ||||||
300M | MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 6.625%, 11/15/2020 | 309,375 | ||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $5,822,989) | 5,741,359 | |||||
VARIABLE AND FLOATING RATE NOTES†—.9% | ||||||
Utilities | ||||||
855M | AES Corp., 3.2336%, 6/1/2019 (cost $857,186) | 844,312 | ||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $86,155,922) | 94.0 | % | 85,231,650 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 6.0 | 5,400,911 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 90,632,561 |
67 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
September 30, 2014
† Interest rates are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates above are the rates in effect at September 30, 2014.
(a) A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis (see Note 1G).
(b) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4).
Accounting Standards Codification 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2 The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of March 31, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Loan Participations | $ | — | $ | 78,645,979 | $ | — | $ | 78,645,979 | ||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 5,741,359 | — | 5,741,359 | ||||||||
Variable & Floating Rate Notes | — | 844,312 | — | 844,312 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | — | $ | 85,231,650 | $ | — | $ | 85,231,650 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization of loan |
participations and corporate bonds. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the period ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
68 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
FUND FOR INCOME
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Fund For Income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 5.38% for Class A shares, 4.67% for Class B shares, 5.42% for Advisor Class shares and 5.59% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 13.9 cents per share on Class A shares, 12.1 cents per share on Class B shares, 14.0 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 14.5 cents per share on Institutional Class shares.
During the period, the broad trends in the high yield market unfolded in line with our expectations as described in the outlook section of our 2013 annual letter. Key elements of our prediction, and of the behavior the market largely exhibited during the year, included:
1.) A continued absence of credit concerns for most companies in the high yield market. Corporate high yield default rates remained historically low, below 2% per annum.
2.) Episodes of price volatility driven not by credit fundamentals, but by macroeconomic or political factors outside the U.S. high yield market. Notably, markets were sensitive to actual or anticipated interest rate movements, to the activity of the Federal Reserve Bank (“Fed”) in tapering its quantitative easing bond-buying program, and to the increasingly accommodative monetary policies of the European Central Bank (“ECB”) and Bank of Japan (“BOJ”).
3.) Quick recoveries from such bouts of volatility. Investors stepped back into the market quickly to buy bonds from creditworthy companies trading at attractive yields.
As a result, returns for the high yield market met our expectations for the review period, ultimately delivering a return largely in line with its start-of-the-year market-weighted coupon. The fiscal year commenced with a strong first half for the high yield market. Fed leadership transitioned from Ben Bernanke to Janet Yellen, suggesting that investors might see only a marginal change in Fed policy. In March, the high yield market delivered only a very modest positive return as investors became concerned that interest rates could start rising as early as the first half of 2015. In the latter half of the month, however, Yellen soothed markets by communicating an extension of the rate hike timeline. Further, increasingly accommodative monetary policies from the ECB and the BOJ effectively began limiting the degree to which U.S. interest rates might be able to rise in an interconnected world. These developments worked to support performance in the high yield market.
69 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
The high yield market’s two monthly declines occurred in July and September. Again, it is important to note that neither decline stemmed from any concerns over the fundamental creditworthiness of U.S. high yield companies. In July, we believe that profit taking, combined with a growing complacency over interest rate risk, created capital outflows that put the market under some technical pressure. In September, following a swift and attractive August market recovery, technical pressure weighed on the market amidst an extremely active new issue season. The market simply required time to absorb its new supply. As overall market prices declined, yields consequently increased toward 6%, attracting institutional investors searching for yield.
In the generally optimistic environment over the review period, the Fund delivered an attractive positive performance, but underperformed its benchmark both net and gross of fees. Historically, a rigorously-research and well-selected portfolio of creditworthy holdings such as we seek to build can outperform the market when the market’s challenges are credit-related. This year, our typically lower-risk posture did not capture all of the market’s available gains. Most notably, we have run the portfolio with less duration risk than the broader market. Duration is a measure of potential sensitivity to changes in the prevailing interest rate environment; portfolios with longer duration tend to decline more in price as interest rates rise than portfolios with shorter durations (yields and price have an inverse relationship; when yields rise, prices fall). Through the year, improving U.S. economic data, strong corporate credit fundamentals, and low requirements for refinancing by high yield companies kept us wary of potential interest rate increases appearing on the horizon. We thus kept duration risk low in the portfolio, particularly in the first half of the year. In a year when investors became increasingly certain that interest rates would not rise, investors ultimately rewarded duration. In the last quarter of the period, we modulated this posture somewhat, layering in additional duration risk as future U.S. interest rate increases appeared to have been staved off.
From an industry perspective, the Fund lost most ground against the index in the telecommunications and mining sectors. Mining proved to be the portfolio’s most volatile sector as it moved frequently between underperformance and outperformance of the rest of the high yield market. Our telecommunications holdings were more concentrated in shorter duration bonds and did not participate in the growth seen in longer duration credit.
In short, our approach is to target long-term consistency of returns by controlling risk. This approach cannot protect a portfolio from all short-term declines or capture all short-term gains, especially those driven by technical market factors. Over the long-term, however, the Fund’s portfolio, which seeks to capture the attractive yield offered by high yield bonds while avoiding defaults, should deliver investors competitive results.
70 |
Over the review period, high yield remained a yield haven in a low-yield world. We think this is likely to continue in the coming fiscal year. We think that in 2015, as in 2014, risk is poised to be more concentrated in the macroeconomic arena than in corporate credit. It remains to be seen whether the U.S. can maintain growth against the backdrop of persistent economic lethargy in Europe and Japan. All eyes are likely to remain on the Fed and its approach to future increases in short-term interest rates. In addition, we will be watching for any negative impact on U.S. companies caused by a strengthening U.S. dollar as the reserve currency of choice, particularly as other governments compete to create inflation by devaluing their currencies. 2015’s high yield default outlook remains benign, particularly for the better-rated high yield companies in which the Fund tends to be concentrated. After a long period in which the market favored risk, and particularly the credit risk of the lowest-rated companies in the high yield market, investors appear less willing to buy the lowest quality names in search of yield. By focusing on quality and market discipline, we feel that any upcoming episodes of volatility can represent attractive short-term buying opportunities that have the potential to benefit portfolio investors over the longer term.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
71 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.18% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 995.75 | $ 5.90 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.15 | $ 5.97 | |
Class B Shares | 2.00% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 992.42 | $ 9.99 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.04 | $10.10 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.86% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 995.97 | $ 4.30 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.76 | $ 4.36 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.78% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 996.88 | $ 3.90 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.16 | $ 3.95 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total value of investments.
72 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Fund For Income (Class A shares), the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 5.38% | 4.67% | 5.42% | 5.59% |
Five Years | 8.89% | 8.08% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 5.09% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 4.15% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | (0.76%) | 0.67% | 5.42% | 5.59% |
Five Years | 7.62% | 7.78% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 4.48% | 4.48% | 3.75% | 4.15% |
S.E.C. 30-Day Yield*** | 4.30% | 3.77% | 4.89% | 5.00% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Fund For Income (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/04 with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index (the “Index”). The Index contains all securities in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Index rated BB1 through B3, based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, but caps issuer exposure at 2%. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
73 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (0.78%), 7.59% and 4.46%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 4.28%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 0.65%, 7.76% and 4.46%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 3.75%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 5.40% and 0.95%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 4.87%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 5.57% and 4.13%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2014 would have been 4.98%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. The issuers of high yield bonds, in which the Fund primarily invests, pay higher interest rates because they have a greater likelihood of financial difficulty, which could result in their inability to repay the bonds fully when due. Prices of high yield bonds are also subject to greater fluctuations. Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
*** The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2014.
74 |
Portfolio of Investments
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
CORPORATE BONDS—89.1% | ||||
Aerospace/Defense—.6% | ||||
$ 3,725M | Meccanica Holdings USA, Inc., 6.25%, 7/15/2019 (a) | $ 4,041,625 | ||
Automotive—2.4% | ||||
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.: | ||||
2,750M | 6.25%, 3/15/2021 | 2,873,750 | ||
1,950M | 6.625%, 10/15/2022 | 2,062,125 | ||
1,425M | General Motors Co., 6.25%, 10/2/2043 | 1,674,375 | ||
3,300M | Gestamp Funding Luxembourg SA, 5.625%, 5/31/2020 (a) | 3,349,500 | ||
Hertz Corp.: | ||||
1,650M | 5.875%, 10/15/2020 | 1,683,000 | ||
150M | 6.25%, 10/15/2022 | 152,625 | ||
Oshkosh Corp.: | ||||
2,400M | 8.5%, 3/1/2020 | 2,544,000 | ||
500M | 5.375%, 3/1/2022 | 505,000 | ||
2,050M | Schaeffler Finance BV, 4.75%, 5/15/2021 (a) | 2,055,125 | ||
16,899,500 | ||||
Building Materials—1.7% | ||||
Building Materials Corp.: | ||||
675M | 6.875%, 8/15/2018 (a) | 700,312 | ||
1,700M | 7.5%, 3/15/2020 (a) | 1,785,000 | ||
825M | 6.75%, 5/1/2021 (a) | 866,250 | ||
1,325M | Cemex Finance, LLC, 9.375%, 10/12/2022 (a) | 1,500,562 | ||
Cemex SAB de CV: | ||||
1,350M | 9.5%, 6/15/2018 (a) | 1,509,907 | ||
1,400M | 6.5%, 12/10/2019 (a) | 1,449,000 | ||
2,400M | Griffon Corp., 5.25%, 3/1/2022 | 2,295,000 | ||
1,750M | USG Corp., 5.875%, 11/1/2021 (a) | 1,793,750 | ||
11,899,781 | ||||
Chemicals—1.3% | ||||
1,625M | Huntsman International, LLC, 8.625%, 3/15/2020 | 1,720,469 | ||
825M | Rayonier AM Products, Inc., 5.5%, 6/1/2024 (a) | 787,875 | ||
4,175M | TPC Group, Inc., 8.75%, 12/15/2020 (a) | 4,456,813 | ||
W.R. Grace & Co.: | ||||
1,250M | 5.125%, 10/1/2021 (a) | 1,273,437 | ||
525M | 5.625%, 10/1/2024 (a) | 540,094 | ||
8,778,688 |
75 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Consumer Non-Durables—2.1% | ||||
Levi Strauss & Co.: | ||||
$ 925M | 7.625%, 5/15/2020 | $ 980,500 | ||
2,625M | 6.875%, 5/1/2022 | 2,756,250 | ||
Reynolds Group Issuer, Inc.: | ||||
1,250M | 7.125%, 4/15/2019 | 1,298,438 | ||
6,550M | 5.75%, 10/15/2020 | 6,697,375 | ||
Spectrum Brands Escrow Corp.: | ||||
1,375M | 6.375%, 11/15/2020 | 1,440,313 | ||
1,480M | 6.625%, 11/15/2022 | 1,561,400 | ||
14,734,276 | ||||
Energy—15.1% | ||||
AmeriGas Finance, LLC: | ||||
500M | 6.75%, 5/20/2020 | 522,500 | ||
1,250M | 7%, 5/20/2022 | 1,315,625 | ||
Antero Resources Finance Corp.: | ||||
675M | 6%, 12/1/2020 | 691,875 | ||
950M | 5.375%, 11/1/2021 | 948,812 | ||
Atlas Pipeline Partners, LP: | ||||
3,075M | 4.75%, 11/15/2021 | 2,878,969 | ||
4,000M | 5.875%, 8/1/2023 | 3,930,000 | ||
2,100M | Basic Energy Services, Inc., 7.75%, 10/15/2022 | 2,194,500 | ||
Berry Petroleum Co.: | ||||
675M | 6.75%, 11/1/2020 | 685,125 | ||
2,275M | 6.375%, 9/15/2022 | 2,218,125 | ||
California Resources Corp.: | ||||
950M | 5.5%, 9/15/2021 (a) | 965,437 | ||
1,000M | 6%, 11/15/2024 (a) | 1,030,000 | ||
Calumet Specialty Products Partners, LP: | ||||
2,650M | 9.625%, 8/1/2020 | 2,928,250 | ||
1,100M | 6.5%, 4/15/2021 (a) | 1,050,500 | ||
525M | 7.625%, 1/15/2022 | 535,500 | ||
Chesapeake Energy Corp.: | ||||
2,025M | 7.25%, 12/15/2018 | 2,318,625 | ||
950M | 6.625%, 8/15/2020 | 1,052,600 | ||
2,000M | 6.875%, 11/15/2020 | 2,240,000 | ||
1,375M | 5.75%, 3/15/2023 | 1,471,250 | ||
CONSOL Energy, Inc.: | ||||
2,352M | 8.25%, 4/1/2020 | 2,466,660 | ||
1,300M | 5.875%, 4/15/2022 (a) | 1,285,375 | ||
2,750M | El Paso Corp., 6.5%, 9/15/2020 | 3,107,500 |
76 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Energy (continued) | ||||
$2,075M | Energy XXI Gulf Coast, Inc., 7.5%, 12/15/2021 | $ 2,043,875 | ||
1,800M | Enquest, PLC, 7%, 4/15/2022 (a) | 1,701,000 | ||
1,350M | Exterran Partners, LP, 6%, 10/1/2022 (a) | 1,319,625 | ||
1,375M | Forum Energy Technologies, Inc., 6.25%, 10/1/2021 | 1,419,687 | ||
2,125M | Gibson Energy, Inc., 6.75%, 7/15/2021 (a) | 2,263,125 | ||
Kinder Morgan, Inc.: | ||||
650M | 5%, 2/15/2021 (a) | 680,875 | ||
1,650M | 5.625%, 11/15/2023 (a) | 1,761,375 | ||
1,900M | Laredo Petroleum, Inc., 5.625%, 1/15/2022 | 1,871,500 | ||
Legacy Reserves, LP: | ||||
3,175M | 8%, 12/1/2020 | 3,317,875 | ||
1,500M | 6.625%, 12/1/2021 | 1,477,500 | ||
1,250M | 6.625%, 12/1/2021 (a) | 1,231,250 | ||
Linn Energy, LLC: | ||||
625M | 6.5%, 5/15/2019 | 615,625 | ||
1,850M | 6.25%, 11/1/2019 | 1,815,312 | ||
1,225M | 8.625%, 4/15/2020 | 1,272,469 | ||
3,275M | 7.75%, 2/1/2021 | 3,315,938 | ||
2,250M | McDermott Finance, LLC, 8%, 5/1/2021 (a) | 2,210,625 | ||
3,025M | Memorial Production Partners, LP, 7.625%, 5/1/2021 | 3,025,000 | ||
2,180M | Northern Blizzard Resources, Inc., 7.25%, 2/1/2022 (a) | 2,256,300 | ||
NuStar Logistics, LP: | ||||
325M | 4.8%, 9/1/2020 | 318,094 | ||
1,375M | 6.75%, 2/1/2021 | 1,502,188 | ||
Offshore Group Investment, Ltd.: | ||||
4,075M | 7.5%, 11/1/2019 | 3,799,938 | ||
1,075M | 7.125%, 4/1/2023 | 952,719 | ||
1,675M | Pacific Drilling SA, 5.375%, 6/1/2020 (a) | 1,541,000 | ||
1,200M | Pioneer Energy Services Corp., 6.125%, 3/15/2022 (a) | 1,191,000 | ||
4,000M | Rain CII Carbon, LLC, 8.25%, 1/15/2021 (a) | 4,180,000 | ||
Rex Energy Corp.: | ||||
1,100M | 8.875%, 12/1/2020 | 1,188,000 | ||
2,250M | 6.25%, 8/1/2022 (a) | 2,179,688 | ||
1,865M | RKI Exploration and Production, LLC, 8.5%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 1,934,938 | ||
Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC: | ||||
3,750M | 6.25%, 3/15/2022 (a) | 3,951,563 | ||
1,375M | 5.625%, 4/15/2023 (a) | 1,395,625 | ||
2,450M | 5.75%, 5/15/2024 (a) | 2,495,938 | ||
2,900M | Samson Investment Co., 9.75%, 2/15/2020 | 2,646,250 | ||
2,450M | SandRidge Energy, Inc., 7.5%, 2/15/2023 | 2,391,813 |
77 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Energy (continued) | ||||
$1,175M | SM Energy Co., 6.5%, 11/15/2021 | $ 1,248,438 | ||
433M | Suburban Propane Partners, LP, 7.375%, 8/1/2021 | 461,145 | ||
2,875M | Unit Corp., 6.625%, 5/15/2021 | 2,896,563 | ||
105,711,084 | ||||
Financials—4.1% | ||||
Ally Financial, Inc.: | ||||
3,625M | 6.25%, 12/1/2017 | 3,896,875 | ||
1,350M | 4.75%, 9/10/2018 | 1,387,125 | ||
4,525M | 8%, 3/15/2020 | 5,282,937 | ||
1,375M | 8%, 11/1/2031 | 1,718,750 | ||
General Motors Financial Co., Inc.: | ||||
575M | 3.25%, 5/15/2018 | 579,312 | ||
1,575M | 6.75%, 6/1/2018 | 1,761,047 | ||
1,125M | 4.375%, 9/25/2021 | 1,151,719 | ||
1,550M | 4.25%, 5/15/2023 | 1,559,687 | ||
International Lease Finance Corp.: | ||||
4,775M | 8.75%, 3/15/2017 | 5,336,063 | ||
4,150M | 8.25%, 12/15/2020 | 4,912,563 | ||
1,375M | Nielsen Co., (Luxembourg) Sarl, 5.5%, 10/1/2021 (a) | 1,388,750 | ||
28,974,828 | ||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—2.3% | ||||
2,200M | Barry Callebaut Services SA, 5.5%, 6/15/2023 (a) | 2,347,048 | ||
1,624M | Chiquita Brands International, Inc., 7.875%, 2/1/2021 | 1,760,010 | ||
2,550M | Darling Ingredients, Inc., 5.375%, 1/15/2022 | 2,581,875 | ||
JBS Investments GmbH: | ||||
1,000M | 7.75%, 10/28/2020 (a) | 1,067,500 | ||
1,550M | 7.25%, 4/3/2024 (a) | 1,584,875 | ||
JBS USA, LLC: | ||||
1,700M | 7.25%, 6/1/2021 (a) | 1,793,500 | ||
1,775M | 5.875%, 7/15/2024 (a) | 1,708,438 | ||
550M | Marfrig Holding Europe BV, 6.875%, 6/24/2019 | 536,525 | ||
1,587M | Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.875%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 1,610,805 | ||
1,475M | Treehouse Foods, Inc., 4.875%, 3/15/2022 | 1,456,563 | ||
16,447,139 | ||||
Food/Drug—.2% | ||||
1,475M | BI-LO, LLC, 8.625%, 9/15/2018 (a) | 1,349,625 |
78 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Forest Products/Containers—3.2% | ||||
$2,175M | Ardagh Packaging Finance, PLC, 6%, 6/30/2021 (a) | $ 2,093,437 | ||
1,925M | CROWN Americas, LLC, 4.5%, 1/15/2023 | 1,828,750 | ||
3,650M | Greif, Inc., 7.75%, 8/1/2019 | 4,161,000 | ||
Sealed Air Corp.: | ||||
1,500M | 8.125%, 9/15/2019 (a) | 1,627,500 | ||
4,325M | 6.5%, 12/1/2020 (a) | 4,633,156 | ||
1,250M | 8.375%, 9/15/2021 (a) | 1,393,750 | ||
3,425M | Silgan Holdings, Inc., 5%, 4/1/2020 | 3,459,250 | ||
2,710M | Tekni-Plex, Inc., 9.75%, 6/1/2019 (a) | 2,960,675 | ||
22,157,518 | ||||
Gaming/Leisure—2.3% | ||||
2,800M | 24 Hour Holdings III, LLC, 8%, 6/1/2022 (a) | 2,604,000 | ||
1,500M | GLP Capital, LP, 4.875%, 11/1/2020 | 1,537,035 | ||
1,350M | Hilton Worldwide Finance, LLC, 5.625%, 10/15/2021 (a) | 1,393,031 | ||
3,325M | National CineMedia, LLC, 7.875%, 7/15/2021 | 3,607,625 | ||
1,700M | Regal Entertainment Group, 5.75%, 3/15/2022 | 1,712,750 | ||
3,175M | Scientific Games International, Inc., 6.625%, 5/15/2021 (a) | 2,663,031 | ||
2,850M | Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 5.25%, 1/15/2021 (a) | 2,778,750 | ||
16,296,222 | ||||
Health Care—6.7% | ||||
Aviv Healthcare Properties, LP: | ||||
850M | 7.75%, 2/15/2019 | 893,562 | ||
825M | 6%, 10/15/2021 | 854,906 | ||
3,799M | Biomet, Inc., 6.5%, 8/1/2020 | 4,036,437 | ||
Community Health Systems, Inc.: | ||||
1,275M | 5.125%, 8/15/2018 | 1,313,250 | ||
2,050M | 8%, 11/15/2019 | 2,193,910 | ||
3,050M | 7.125%, 7/15/2020 | 3,236,812 | ||
3,425M | Endo Finance Co., 5.75%, 1/15/2022 (a) | 3,390,750 | ||
1,150M | Fresenius Medical Care US Finance II, Inc., 5.625%, 7/31/2019 (a) | 1,216,355 | ||
HCA, Inc.: | ||||
2,075M | 8%, 10/1/2018 | 2,365,500 | ||
2,325M | 6.5%, 2/15/2020 | 2,545,875 | ||
1,225M | 6.25%, 2/15/2021 | 1,283,187 | ||
1,950M | 7.75%, 5/15/2021 | 2,088,937 | ||
2,075M | 7.5%, 2/15/2022 | 2,339,562 |
79 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Health Care (continued) | ||||
HealthSouth Corp.: | ||||
$ 957M | 8.125%, 2/15/2020 | $ 1,014,420 | ||
847M | 7.75%, 9/15/2022 | 907,349 | ||
800M | NBTY, Inc., 9%, 10/1/2018 | 836,000 | ||
Tenet Healthcare Corp.: | ||||
3,450M | 6.75%, 2/1/2020 | 3,609,563 | ||
1,300M | 6%, 10/1/2020 | 1,378,000 | ||
2,450M | Universal Hospital Services, Inc., 7.625%, 8/15/2020 | 2,315,250 | ||
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.: | ||||
5,200M | 6.375%, 10/15/2020 (a) | 5,362,500 | ||
1,300M | 5.625%, 12/1/2021 (a) | 1,298,375 | ||
2,250M | WellCare Health Plans, Inc., 5.75%, 11/15/2020 | 2,300,625 | ||
46,781,125 | ||||
Information Technology—4.8% | ||||
Activision Blizzard, Inc.: | ||||
1,075M | 5.625%, 9/15/2021 (a) | 1,120,687 | ||
500M | 6.125%, 9/15/2023 (a) | 532,500 | ||
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.: | ||||
1,000M | 6.75%, 3/1/2019 | 1,015,000 | ||
2,450M | 7.5%, 8/15/2022 | 2,486,750 | ||
700M | 7%, 7/1/2024 | 672,000 | ||
725M | Anixter, Inc., 5.125%, 10/1/2021 | 719,562 | ||
Audatex North America, Inc.: | ||||
4,225M | 6%, 6/15/2021 (a) | 4,351,750 | ||
875M | 6.125%, 11/1/2023 (a) | 901,250 | ||
425M | Belden, Inc., 5.5%, 9/1/2022 (a) | 432,437 | ||
1,775M | CommScope, Inc., 5%, 6/15/2021 (a) | 1,748,375 | ||
1,475M | CyrusOne, LP, 6.375%, 11/15/2022 | 1,548,750 | ||
3,050M | Denali Borrower, LLC, 5.625%, 10/15/2020 (a) | 3,145,312 | ||
2,025M | Equinix, Inc., 7%, 7/15/2021 | 2,176,875 | ||
1,800M | IAC/InterActiveCorp, 4.875%, 11/30/2018 | 1,827,000 | ||
3,375M | Lender Processing Services, Inc., 5.75%, 4/15/2023 | 3,543,750 | ||
Micron Technology, Inc.: | ||||
1,150M | 5.875%, 2/15/2022 (a) | 1,193,125 | ||
4,075M | 5.5%, 2/1/2025 (a) | 4,003,688 | ||
2,100M | Zebra Technologies Corp., 7.25%, 10/15/2022 (a)(b) | 2,131,500 | ||
33,550,311 |
80 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Manufacturing—4.0% | ||||
Bombardier, Inc.: | ||||
$2,100M | 7.5%, 3/15/2018 (a) | $ 2,304,750 | ||
3,075M | 7.75%, 3/15/2020 (a) | 3,367,740 | ||
3,425M | Brand Energy & Infrastructure Services, Inc., 8.5%, 12/1/2021 (a) | 3,459,250 | ||
3,850M | Case New Holland, Inc., 7.875%, 12/1/2017 | 4,297,562 | ||
2,450M | Dematic SA, 7.75%, 12/15/2020 (a) | 2,584,750 | ||
EDP Finance BV: | ||||
1,650M | 6%, 2/2/2018 (a) | 1,779,475 | ||
200M | 5.25%, 1/14/2021 (a) | 208,374 | ||
1,575M | EnPro Industries, Inc., 5.875%, 9/15/2022 (a) | 1,604,531 | ||
2,300M | H&E Equipment Services, Inc., 7%, 9/1/2022 | 2,466,750 | ||
Rexel SA: | ||||
5,475M | 6.125%, 12/15/2019 (a) | 5,639,250 | ||
550M | 5.25%, 6/15/2020 (a) | 555,156 | ||
28,267,588 | ||||
Media-Broadcasting—2.7% | ||||
Belo Corp.: | ||||
725M | 7.75%, 6/1/2027 | 808,375 | ||
150M | 7.25%, 9/15/2027 | 160,500 | ||
1,575M | Block Communications, Inc., 7.25%, 2/1/2020 (a) | 1,641,937 | ||
2,075M | LIN Television Corp., 8.375%, 4/15/2018 | 2,161,891 | ||
3,175M | Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., 6.875%, 11/15/2020 | 3,270,250 | ||
Sinclair Television Group, Inc.: | ||||
4,075M | 5.375%, 4/1/2021 | 4,034,250 | ||
925M | 6.375%, 11/1/2021 | 950,438 | ||
Sirius XM Radio, Inc.: | ||||
2,750M | 5.75%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 2,777,500 | ||
800M | 4.625%, 5/15/2023 (a) | 748,000 | ||
2,350M | 6%, 7/15/2024 (a) | 2,391,125 | ||
18,944,266 | ||||
Media-Cable TV—7.0% | ||||
1,375M | Altice SA, 7.75%, 5/15/2022 (a) | 1,423,125 | ||
Cablevision Systems Corp.: | ||||
2,000M | 8.625%, 9/15/2017 | 2,227,500 | ||
3,100M | 7.75%, 4/15/2018 | 3,371,250 |
81 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Media-Cable TV (continued) | ||||
CCO Holdings, LLC: | ||||
$1,825M | 7%, 1/15/2019 | $ 1,900,281 | ||
1,125M | 8.125%, 4/30/2020 | 1,191,094 | ||
1,175M | 7.375%, 6/1/2020 | 1,245,500 | ||
650M | 5.25%, 3/15/2021 | 639,437 | ||
550M | 6.5%, 4/30/2021 | 575,437 | ||
875M | 5.125%, 2/15/2023 | 843,281 | ||
5,300M | Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, 6.375%, 9/15/2020 (a) | 5,478,875 | ||
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc.: | ||||
200M | 7.625%, 3/15/2020 Series “A” | 207,000 | ||
2,925M | 7.625%, 3/15/2020 Series “B” | 3,049,312 | ||
1,025M | 6.5%, 11/15/2022 Series “A” | 1,042,937 | ||
2,375M | 6.5%, 11/15/2022 Series “B” | 2,440,312 | ||
DISH DBS Corp.: | ||||
5,475M | 7.875%, 9/1/2019 | 6,200,437 | ||
950M | 5%, 3/15/2023 | 913,781 | ||
3,025M | Gray Television, Inc., 7.5%, 10/1/2020 | 3,108,187 | ||
3,275M | Harron Communications, LP, 9.125%, 4/1/2020 (a) | 3,586,125 | ||
1,675M | Lynx II Corp., 6.375%, 4/15/2023 (a) | 1,737,813 | ||
2,250M | Midcontinent Communications Corp., 6.25%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 2,283,750 | ||
Numericable Group SA: | ||||
2,975M | 6%, 5/15/2022 (a) | 3,001,031 | ||
1,225M | 6.25%, 5/15/2024 (a) | 1,223,469 | ||
1,275M | VTR Finance BV, 6.875%, 1/15/2024 (a) | 1,322,813 | ||
49,012,747 | ||||
Media-Diversified—.5% | ||||
Gannett Co, Inc.: | ||||
1,700M | 5.125%, 7/15/2020 | 1,712,750 | ||
1,600M | 6.375%, 10/15/2023 (a) | 1,668,000 | ||
3,380,750 | ||||
Metals/Mining—7.8% | ||||
Alcoa, Inc.: | ||||
4,850M | 6.15%, 8/15/2020 | 5,352,106 | ||
800M | 5.125%, 10/1/2024 | 802,593 | ||
Aleris International, Inc.: | ||||
825M | 7.625%, 2/15/2018 | 834,281 | ||
4,000M | 7.875%, 11/1/2020 | 4,000,000 |
82 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Metals/Mining (continued) | ||||
ArcelorMittal: | ||||
$2,725M | 6.125%, 6/1/2018 | $ 2,895,312 | ||
4,006M | 10.35%, 6/1/2019 | 4,902,342 | ||
525M | 6%, 3/1/2021 | 553,875 | ||
1,475M | 6.75%, 2/25/2022 | 1,591,156 | ||
Arch Coal, Inc.: | ||||
325M | 7%, 6/15/2019 | 174,281 | ||
2,475M | 7.25%, 10/1/2020 | 1,348,875 | ||
2,400M | 7.25%, 6/15/2021 | 1,170,000 | ||
725M | Constellium NV, 5.75%, 5/15/2024 (a) | 728,625 | ||
FMG Resources (August 2006) Property, Ltd.: | ||||
3,675M | 6.875%, 2/1/2018 (a) | 3,785,250 | ||
1,350M | 8.25%, 11/1/2019 (a) | 1,400,625 | ||
5,025M | JMC Steel Group, 8.25%, 3/15/2018 (a) | 5,094,094 | ||
1,000M | Kaiser Aluminum Corp., 8.25%, 6/1/2020 | 1,107,500 | ||
Novelis, Inc.: | ||||
5,375M | 8.375%, 12/15/2017 | 5,596,719 | ||
1,850M | 8.75%, 12/15/2020 | 1,986,438 | ||
Peabody Energy Corp.: | ||||
2,050M | 6%, 11/15/2018 | 2,019,250 | ||
4,225M | 6.5%, 9/15/2020 | 3,971,500 | ||
800M | 7.875%, 11/1/2026 | 778,000 | ||
Steel Dynamics, Inc.: | ||||
650M | 5.125%, 10/1/2021 (a) | 659,750 | ||
675M | 6.375%, 8/15/2022 | 716,344 | ||
1,000M | 5.5%, 10/1/2024 (a) | 1,007,500 | ||
1,925M | Wise Metals Group, LLC, 8.75%, 12/15/2018 (a) | 2,064,563 | ||
54,540,979 | ||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—.3% | ||||
2,162M | Taylor Morrison Communities, Inc., 7.75%, 4/15/2020 (a) | 2,324,150 | ||
Retail-General Merchandise—1.7% | ||||
2,375M | Group 1 Automotive, Inc., 5%, 6/1/2022 (a) | 2,309,687 | ||
2,975M | Landry’s, Inc., 9.375%, 5/1/2020 (a) | 3,160,938 | ||
3,125M | Limited Brands, Inc., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 3,703,125 | ||
2,250M | Party City Holdings, Inc., 8.875%, 8/1/2020 | 2,441,250 | ||
11,615,000 |
83 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Services—5.9% | ||||
ADT Corp.: | ||||
$4,050M | 3.5%, 7/15/2022 | $ 3,513,375 | ||
650M | 4.125%, 6/15/2023 | 580,125 | ||
Aecom Technology Corp.: | ||||
1,025M | 5.75%, 10/15/2022 (a)(b) | 1,031,406 | ||
1,650M | 5.875%, 10/15/2024 (a)(b) | 1,668,562 | ||
1,525M | Ashtead Capital, Inc., 6.5%, 7/15/2022 (a) | 1,624,125 | ||
1,750M | CoreLogic, Inc., 7.25%, 6/1/2021 | 1,846,250 | ||
Covanta Holding Corp.: | ||||
1,200M | 7.25%, 12/1/2020 | 1,284,000 | ||
2,225M | 6.375%, 10/1/2022 | 2,358,500 | ||
Geo Group, Inc.: | ||||
1,450M | 5.875%, 1/15/2022 | 1,471,750 | ||
1,450M | 5.875%, 10/15/2024 | 1,460,875 | ||
Iron Mountain, Inc.: | ||||
1,525M | 7.75%, 10/1/2019 | 1,635,563 | ||
3,950M | 5.75%, 8/15/2024 | 3,895,688 | ||
4,650M | Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., 7%, 9/1/2020 (a) | 4,963,875 | ||
3,650M | LKQ Corp., 4.75%, 5/15/2023 | 3,540,500 | ||
1,725M | Monitronics International, Inc., 9.125%, 4/1/2020 | 1,785,375 | ||
PHH Corp.: | ||||
1,975M | 7.375%, 9/1/2019 | 2,103,375 | ||
1,500M | 6.375%, 8/15/2021 | 1,477,500 | ||
2,925M | Reliance Intermediate Holdings, LP, 9.5%, 12/15/2019 (a) | 3,071,250 | ||
1,625M | Safway Group Holding, LLC, 7%, 5/15/2018 (a) | 1,661,563 | ||
40,973,657 | ||||
Telecommunications—5.6% | ||||
CenturyLink, Inc.: | ||||
400M | 5.625%, 4/1/2020 | 414,100 | ||
3,200M | 5.8%, 3/15/2022 | 3,296,000 | ||
1,250M | 6.75%, 12/1/2023 | 1,345,312 | ||
Citizens Communications Co.: | ||||
4,175M | 7.125%, 3/15/2019 | 4,529,875 | ||
2,175M | 9%, 8/15/2031 | 2,267,437 | ||
1,600M | Frontier Communications Corp., 8.5%, 4/15/2020 | 1,784,000 | ||
2,025M | GCI, Inc., 8.625%, 11/15/2019 | 2,093,344 | ||
1,550M | Inmarsat Finance, PLC, 4.875%, 5/15/2022 (a) | 1,519,000 |
84 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Telecommunications (continued) | ||||
Intelsat Jackson Holdings SA: | ||||
$3,525M | 7.25%, 4/1/2019 | $ 3,714,469 | ||
1,200M | 8.5%, 11/1/2019 | 1,258,110 | ||
2,075M | 7.25%, 10/15/2020 | 2,199,500 | ||
Sprint Capital Corp.: | ||||
1,300M | 6.9%, 5/1/2019 | 1,373,125 | ||
2,125M | 6.875%, 11/15/2028 | 2,040,000 | ||
Wind Acquisition Finance SA: | ||||
2,000M | 4.75%, 7/15/2020 (a) | 1,925,000 | ||
4,975M | 7.375%, 4/23/2021 (a) | 5,012,313 | ||
Windstream Corp.: | ||||
1,500M | 7.875%, 11/1/2017 | 1,670,625 | ||
2,050M | 7.75%, 10/15/2020 | 2,167,875 | ||
600M | 6.375%, 8/1/2023 | 581,250 | ||
39,191,335 | ||||
Transportation—1.6% | ||||
Aircastle, Ltd.: | ||||
550M | 4.625%, 12/15/2018 | 551,375 | ||
5,112M | 6.25%, 12/1/2019 | 5,405,940 | ||
1,050M | American Airlines Group, Inc., 5.5%, 10/1/2019 (a) | 1,039,500 | ||
Fly Leasing, Ltd.: | ||||
2,150M | 6.75%, 12/15/2020 (b) | 2,241,375 | ||
1,900M | 6.375%, 10/15/2021 (b) | 1,885,750 | ||
11,123,940 | ||||
Utilities—2.1% | ||||
AES Corp.: | ||||
1,200M | 8%, 6/1/2020 | 1,383,000 | ||
2,525M | 7.375%, 7/1/2021 | 2,840,625 | ||
1,375M | 5.5%, 3/15/2024 | 1,344,062 | ||
600M | ContourGlobal Power Holdings SA, 7.125%, 6/1/2019 (a) | 597,000 | ||
911M | Indiantown Cogeneration Utilities, LP, 9.77%, 12/15/2020 | 1,042,392 | ||
3,075M | InterGen NV, 7%, 6/30/2023 (a) | 2,975,063 | ||
1,425M | NRG Energy, Inc., 6.25%, 5/1/2024 (a) | 1,435,688 | ||
3,010M | NSG Holdings, LLC, 7.75%, 12/15/2025 (a) | 3,250,800 | ||
14,868,630 | ||||
Waste Management—.3% | ||||
2,050M | ADS Waste Holdings, Inc., 8.25%, 10/1/2020 | 2,147,375 |
85 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Wireless Communications—2.8% | ||||
$2,225M | MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 6.625%, 11/15/2020 | $ 2,294,531 | ||
700M | Qualitytech, LP, 5.875%, 8/1/2022 (a) | 687,750 | ||
Sprint Nextel Corp.: | ||||
925M | 9.125%, 3/1/2017 | 1,045,250 | ||
1,250M | 8.375%, 8/15/2017 | 1,401,563 | ||
3,425M | 7%, 8/15/2020 | 3,587,688 | ||
2,200M | 6%, 11/15/2022 | 2,142,250 | ||
1,800M | Telemar Norte Leste SA, 5.5%, 10/23/2020 (a) | 1,766,340 | ||
T-Mobile USA, Inc.: | ||||
4,100M | 6.25%, 4/1/2021 | 4,156,375 | ||
2,725M | 6.625%, 4/1/2023 | 2,799,938 | ||
19,881,685 | ||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $618,352,144) | 623,893,824 | |||
LOAN PARTICIPATIONS†—7.0% | ||||
Automotive—.2% | ||||
1,521M | CS Intermediate Holdco 2, LLC, 4%, 4/4/2021 | 1,503,123 | ||
Chemicals—.4% | ||||
2,667M | Axalta Coating Systems Dutch Holdings BBV, 3.75%, 2/1/2020 | 2,629,713 | ||
Energy—1.0% | ||||
3,886M | Drillships Financing Holding, Inc., 6%, 3/31/2021 | 3,733,964 | ||
1,000M | Fieldwood Energy, LLC, 8.375%, 9/30/2020 | 1,011,667 | ||
2,225M | Jonah Energy, LLC, 7.5%, 5/12/2021 | 2,208,313 | ||
6,953,944 | ||||
Financial Services—.4% | ||||
2,940M | Ocwen Loan Servicing Corp., 5%, 2/15/2018 | 2,903,472 | ||
Food/Drug—1.4% | ||||
3,886M | Albertson’s, LLC, 4.75%, 3/21/2019 | 3,872,921 | ||
3,215M | Rite Aid Corp., 4.875%, 6/21/2021 | 3,220,359 | ||
2,834M | Supervalu, Inc., 4.5%, 3/21/2019 | 2,800,080 | ||
9,893,360 | ||||
Gaming/Leisure—.2% | ||||
1,550M | Seminole Hard Rock Entertainment, Inc., 3.5%, 5/14/2020 | 1,522,597 |
86 |
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Information Technology—.7% | ||||||
$1,440M | ARRIS Enterprises, Inc., 3.25%, 4/17/2020 | $ 1,422,876 | ||||
3,441M | Avago Technologies Cayman, Ltd., 3.75%, 5/6/2021 | 3,412,340 | ||||
4,835,216 | ||||||
Manufacturing—.5% | ||||||
3,648M | Gardner Denver, Inc., 4.25%, 7/30/2020 | 3,592,575 | ||||
Media-Diversified—.8% | ||||||
1,116M | Kasima, LLC, 3.25%, 5/17/2021 | 1,105,712 | ||||
4,611M | Tribune Co., 4%, 12/27/2020 | 4,563,744 | ||||
5,669,456 | ||||||
Metals/Mining—.6% | ||||||
2,810M | Arch Coal, Inc., 6.25%, 5/16/2018 | 2,569,164 | ||||
1,280M | Oxbow Carbon, LLC, 8%, 1/19/2020 | 1,295,200 | ||||
3,864,364 | ||||||
Retail-General Merchandise—.5% | ||||||
3,500M | Men’s Wearhouse, Inc., 4.5%, 6/18/2021 | 3,494,166 | ||||
Services—.3% | ||||||
808M | Allied Security Holdings, LLC, 4.25%, 2/12/2021 | 800,971 | ||||
605M | Brickman Group, Ltd., LLC, 4%, 12/18/2020 | 595,441 | ||||
823M | Doosan Infrascore International, Inc., 4.5%, 5/28/2021 | 822,938 | ||||
2,219,350 | ||||||
Total Value of Loan Participations (cost $49,469,603) | 49,081,336 | |||||
PASS THROUGH CERTIFICATES—.5% | ||||||
Transportation | ||||||
3,730M | American Airlines 13-2 B PTT, 5.6%, 7/15/2020 (a) (cost $3,782,669) | 3,841,581 | ||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $671,604,416) | 96.6 | % | 676,816,741 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 3.4 | 23,563,152 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 700,379,893 |
† | Interest rates are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates above are the rates in effect |
at September 30, 2014. | |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
(b) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis |
(see Note 1G). |
87 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2014
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
PTT | Pass Through Trust |
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2 The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | $ | — | $ | 623,893,824 | $ | — | $ | 623,893,824 | ||||
Loan Participations | — | 49,081,336 | — | 49,081,336 | ||||||||
Pass Through Certificates | — | 3,841,581 | — | 3,841,581 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | — | $ | 676,816,741 | $ | — | $ | 676,816,741 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization of corporate bonds, |
loan participations and pass through certificates. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
88 |
The following is a reconciliation of Fund investments valued using Level 3 inputs for the period:
Investments | Investments | ||||||||
in | in | ||||||||
Corporate | Common | ||||||||
Bonds | Stocks | Total | |||||||
Balance, September 30, 2013 | $ | — | $ | 3,785 | $ | 3,785 | |||
Purchases | — | — | — | ||||||
Sales | — | (3,785) | (3,785) | ||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation | 4,478,295 | 381,985 | 4,860,280 | ||||||
Realized loss | (4,478,295) | (381,985) | (4,860,280) | ||||||
Transfer into Level 3 | — | — | — | ||||||
Transfer out of Level 3 | — | — | — | ||||||
Balance, September 30, 2014 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
89 |
Portfolio Composition (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2014
The dollar weighted average of credit ratings of all bonds held by the Fund during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, computed on a monthly basis, are set forth below. This information reflects the average composition of the Fund’s assets during the 2014 fiscal year and is not necessarily representative of the Fund as of the end of its 2014 fiscal year, the current fiscal year or at any other time in the future.
Comparable Quality of | ||
Rated by | Unrated Securities to | |
Moody’s | Bonds Rated by Moody’s | |
Baa2 | 0.62% | 0.00% |
Baa3 | 2.15 | 0.00 |
Ba1 | 6.15 | 0.00 |
Ba2 | 13.16 | 0.00 |
Ba3 | 14.71 | 0.00 |
BBB- | 0.00 | 0.05 |
BB+ | 0.00 | 1.30 |
BB | 0.00 | 2.34 |
BB- | 0.00 | 0.26 |
B+ | 0.00 | 0.15 |
B | 0.00 | 0.76 |
B- | 0.00 | 0.19 |
B1 | 24.14 | 0.00 |
B2 | 15.01 | 0.00 |
B3 | 16.26 | 0.00 |
Caa1 | 6.90 | 0.00 |
Caa2 | 0.49 | 0.00 |
Caa3 | 0.19 | 0.00 |
Caa | 0.43 | 0.00 |
90 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
TOTAL RETURN FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Total Return Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 10.18% for Class A shares, 9.29% for Class B shares, 10.34% for Advisor Class shares and 10.55% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 30.6 cents per share on Class A shares, 15.7 cents per share on Class B shares, 32.5 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 36.4 cents per share on Institutional Class shares. In addition, the Fund distributed capital gains of 41.6 cents per share on each class of shares.
Economic Overview and Market Summary
The U.S. economy, as measured by gross domestic product (“GDP”), grew slightly faster than 2% during the review period, albeit in an unsteady manner, with quarterly growth ranging from –2.1% to 4.6%. This pace of economic growth was sufficient to reduce the unemployment rate from 7.2% to 5.9%, its lowest level since 2008. While a positive development, the employment picture was somewhat tempered by a continued decline in the labor force participation rate and anemic wage growth. Inflation remained subdued, with consumer prices, excluding the volatile food and energy components, increasing only 1.7%, below the Federal Reserve’s (the “Fed’s”) targeted 2% rate. The Fed remained on course to taper its bond buying program, scheduled to conclude in October, and to raise the federal funds rate in the second half of next year.
Fixed Income
Interest rates were mixed during the review period. Short- and intermediate-term interest rates moved slightly higher in anticipation of an eventual tightening of monetary policy by the Fed. In particular, two-year and five-year Treasury note yields increased from 0.32% and 1.38% to 0.57% and 1.76%, respectively. In contrast, the benchmark ten-year Treasury note yield ended the review period lower, moving from 2.61% to 2.49%. After touching two-and-a-half year highs at the end of 2013, ten-year yields moved steadily lower for the next three quarters, confounding consensus expectations for higher interest rates in 2014. The move down in long-term yields reflected a number of factors, including slower than expected global economic growth (particularly in Europe), geopolitical events (Ukraine, Gaza, ISIS), which supported “flight-to-safety” flows into the U.S. bond market, and investors’ belief that this Fed tightening cycle would be more benign than in the past.
The broad bond market returned 4.1%, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Both interest rate risk and credit risk were rewarded during the review period, with longer maturity and lower rated bonds seeing the highest returns. Specifically, high yield bonds gained 7.2% as default rates remained historically low. Investment grade
91 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
corporate bonds benefited primarily from lower interest rates and, secondarily, from tighter credit spreads, gaining 7.1%. Mortgage-backed bonds, whose returns tend to reflect intermediate-term interest rates, gained 3.7%. While the broad Treasury market returned only 2.7%, 10+ year Treasuries were up 11.3% due to the decline in long-term interest rates. Money market returns continued to be essentially flat, reflecting the Fed’s continuation of very easy monetary policy.
During the review period, the Fund had average bond and cash allocations of 33.6% and 6.8%, respectively. As a percentage of the Fund’s total assets, investment grade corporate bonds were the largest bond allocation at 24.2%, followed by U.S. Government securities at 4.8%, mortgage-backed securities at 3.8%, and municipal bonds at 0.8%. The Fund’s overweight in corporate bonds was a positive contributor to performance. Its contribution was partially offset by limited exposure to longer maturity securities, as well as a slight underweight in fixed income and commensurate overweight in cash.
Equities
During the period under review, the Fund’s performance was driven by a combination of gradually improving economic conditions in the U.S., accommodative monetary policy from the Fed, and improving corporate fundamentals. Increased market volatility towards the end of the period under review also impacted the Fund’s results.
Investor sentiment continued to be strong, with stocks benefitting from solid corporate earnings growth and, to a lesser degree, continued positive re-rating of market-valuation metrics.
Despite numerous challenges throughout the year — including worries over when the Fed would end its bond buying program and raise interest rates; a very slow start to the year as a combination of poor weather and slow demand led to the U.S. economy contracting in the first quarter of 2014; slowing growth in Europe and emerging economies; and numerous global flashpoints — U.S. equity markets shrugged off concerns and continued to deliver solid double digit returns.
This year’s market results were broadly positive overall, with all market sectors participating. Unlike last year where small- and mid-cap stocks led the way, larger-cap stocks set the pace this year as investors became more risk conscious given increased concerns about global growth. Companies with strong profitability, earnings growth, solid balance sheets and strong, free cash-flows led results. Mergers and acquisitions also continued to drive strong performance, especially in the healthcare sector.
These conditions produced a solid year for the Fund on an absolute basis, which continued to invest across all market capitalization segments, allocating 69% of its holdings to large-cap, 14% to mid-cap and 16% to small-cap stocks (ranges defined by Lipper) as of September 30, 2014.
92 |
The Fund did underperform its benchmark for the period under review. The large-and mid-cap segments provided positive returns, while the small-cap segment was down for the year. The large-cap segment exceeded the benchmark, while the small-and mid-cap segments underperformed. The Fund benefited from good stock selection in the healthcare and information technology sectors, and suffered from weaker stock selection in the industrials and consumer staples sectors. In a period in which dividend-paying stocks underperformed non-dividend-paying stocks, the Fund was disadvantaged by its nearly 85% weighting towards stocks that pay dividends.
Specifically within sector performance, the Fund’s healthcare performers all benefit-ted from strong earnings results: Gilead Sciences, the biopharmaceutical company, was up 69% as the company delivered strong business results, received Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approval and strong initial orders for its blockbuster next-generation Hepatitis C drug called Sovaldi, and other drugs in the R&D pipeline showed promise in successful clinical trials. Actavis, a leading generic drug maker, was up 68%, as it reported strong earnings results. During the year, the firm benefit-ted from the acquisition of Warner Chilcott, announced and completed the acquisition of Forest Laboratories in an earnings accretive transaction, and was approached by Pfizer as a potential M&A target. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a leading smaller cap drug manufacturer, also had standout performance. The shares were up 134% as the company continued to deliver strong results, received positive FDA data on two potentially large drug opportunities, and was rumored to have been approached as a potential M&A target.
Within information technologies, several investments benefited the Fund’s performance: Apple, Inc. was up 48% as solid earnings results, a $30 billion increase in the share repurchase program, a 7 for 1 stock split, and a better than expected launch of the company’s new iPhone lineup drove the stock higher. Semiconductor manufacturer Avago Technologies had a very strong year, gaining 101% as the company benefited from strong quarterly results, completed the accretive acquisition of competitor LSI Corp., and benefited from the company’s increased content on the very successful launch of the iPhone 6. Longtime holding Microsoft also produced positive returns for the Fund, as its shares were up 39%. Shares rallied as the company hired Satya Nadella to the CEO position, delivered strong results on better than expected PC demand, announced a large cost cutting plan and agreed to purchase game company Mojang.
The consumer staples and industrials sectors were the largest sources of underperformance for the year. After providing the Fund with its best performance in 2013, Nu Skin Enterprises was the source of the Fund’s largest underperformance as the stock was down 53%. After seeing robust sales and profit growth in the previous year, the direct seller of personal and nutritional products was forced to temporarily halt
93 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
recruitment of new distributors in China following a government regulator announcing that it was looking into the company’s recruiting and sales practices. While the company has been cleared, and has resumed sales recruitment in China, Nu Skin’s business results came in much lower than expected throughout the year as the direct seller has had a slower ramp up back to previous levels.
In the industrials sector, NeuStar —a services company that provides local number portability services in the U.S.—was down 50% as concerns about the company’s largest contract were confirmed as an advisory committee to the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) recommended that the contract be awarded to NeuStar’s competitor. This caused investors to fear that the company would lose the Local Number Portability Administration (“LNPA”) contract that makes up a material portion of the company’s profits. The shares were sold from the portfolio during the fiscal year.
To a lesser degree, the Fund underperformed the Index within the financial sector due to a longstanding underweight position in that sector. With increased costs from greater regulation, and ongoing effects from low interest rates due to the Fed’s quantitative easing, financial sector profit growth remains weak, impacting these companies’ ability to raise dividends and repurchase stock. We have opted to invest in other sectors providing better near-term opportunities.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
94 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.18% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,028.85 | $6.00 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.15 | $5.97 | |
Class B Shares | 1.96% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,024.61 | $9.95 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.24 | $9.90 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.77% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,030.92 | $3.92 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.21 | $3.90 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.76% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,030.66 | $3.87 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.26 | $3.85 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total market value of investments.
95 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Total Return Fund (Class A shares), the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 10.18% | 9.29% | 10.34% | 10.55% |
Five Years | 11.10% | 10.30% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 7.01% | 6.39% | 10.94% | 11.15% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 3.83% | 5.29% | 10.34% | 10.55% |
Five Years | 9.79% | 10.02% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 6.38% | 6.39% | 10.94% | 11.15% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Total Return Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/04 with theoretical investments in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Indices”). The BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index tracks the performance of U.S. dollar denominated investment grade debt publicly issued in the US domestic market, including U.S. Treasuries, quasi-government securities, corporates, covered bonds and residential mortgage pass-through securities. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has
96 |
been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for Ten Years would have been 6.36%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Ten Years would have been 6.37%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 8.35%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 8.71%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Master Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and Standard & Poor’s 500 Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
97 |
Portfolio of Investments
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—58.8% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—8.3% | ||||
80,100 | * | Belmond, Ltd. – Class “A” | $ 933,966 | |
64,900 | BorgWarner, Inc. | 3,414,389 | ||
98,600 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 5,275,100 | ||
80,000 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 4,907,200 | ||
62,500 | Extended Stay America, Inc. | 1,483,750 | ||
129,200 | Ford Motor Company | 1,910,868 | ||
33,700 | GNC Holdings, Inc. – Class “A” | 1,305,538 | ||
39,200 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 3,843,168 | ||
46,700 | Home Depot, Inc. | 4,284,258 | ||
69,300 | * | Jarden Corporation | 4,165,623 | |
81,000 | L Brands, Inc. | 5,425,380 | ||
50,800 | Lear Corporation | 4,389,628 | ||
40,200 | Macy’s, Inc. | 2,338,836 | ||
36,400 | Magna International, Inc. | 3,454,724 | ||
16,300 | McDonald’s Corporation | 1,545,403 | ||
85,600 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 2,945,496 | ||
38,900 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 1,578,951 | ||
39,700 | Pier 1 Imports, Inc. | 472,033 | ||
5,800 | * | Steiner Leisure, Ltd. | 218,022 | |
28,100 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 2,845,125 | |
45,700 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 3,155,128 | ||
1,400 | * | Vince Holding Corporation | 42,364 | |
20,000 | Walt Disney Company | 1,780,600 | ||
36,560 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 2,970,866 | ||
64,686,416 | ||||
Consumer Staples—4.7% | ||||
117,200 | Altria Group, Inc. | 5,384,168 | ||
64,400 | Avon Products, Inc. | 811,440 | ||
113,200 | Coca-Cola Company | 4,829,112 | ||
70,500 | CVS Health Corporation | 5,611,095 | ||
35,600 | Herbalife, Ltd. | 1,557,500 | ||
84,500 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,805,035 | ||
42,900 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 3,993,561 | ||
71,400 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 5,954,760 | ||
27,400 | Procter & Gamble Company | 2,294,476 | ||
38,600 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 2,951,742 | ||
37,192,889 |
98 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Energy—5.7% | ||||
36,300 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | $ 3,682,272 | ||
25,200 | Chevron Corporation | 3,006,864 | ||
60,700 | ConocoPhillips | 4,644,764 | ||
65,700 | Devon Energy Corporation | 4,479,426 | ||
36,200 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 1,495,422 | ||
52,500 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 4,937,625 | ||
25,900 | Hess Corporation | 2,442,888 | ||
1,897 | Hugoton Royalty Trust | 17,016 | ||
77,486 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 2,912,699 | ||
44,943 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 3,805,324 | ||
41,800 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 3,180,980 | ||
24,600 | Noble Corporation, PLC | 546,612 | ||
25,800 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 2,480,670 | ||
30,700 | Phillips 66 | 2,496,217 | ||
12,200 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 1,240,618 | ||
91,800 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 3,318,570 | ||
44,687,967 | ||||
Financials—5.8% | ||||
59,400 | American Express Company | 5,199,876 | ||
36,400 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 4,491,032 | ||
139,100 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 3,096,366 | ||
7,800 | * | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 182,676 | |
70,650 | Discover Financial Services | 4,549,153 | ||
25,300 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 586,201 | ||
48,900 | * | Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. – Class “A” | 527,631 | |
22,100 | Invesco, Ltd. | 872,508 | ||
102,100 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 6,150,504 | ||
25,600 | Morgan Stanley | 884,992 | ||
42,400 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 3,628,592 | ||
14,900 | SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (ETF) | 2,935,598 | ||
25,300 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 957,858 | ||
139,372 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 1,926,121 | ||
92,800 | U.S. Bancorp | 3,881,824 | ||
109,700 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 2,226,910 | ||
61,100 | Wells Fargo & Company | 3,169,257 | ||
45,267,099 |
99 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Health Care—11.0% | ||||
103,900 | Abbott Laboratories | $ 4,321,201 | ||
96,800 | AbbVie, Inc. | 5,591,168 | ||
40,104 | * | Actavis, PLC | 9,676,293 | |
45,700 | Baxter International, Inc. | 3,279,889 | ||
19,000 | Covidien, PLC | 1,643,690 | ||
52,217 | * | Express Scripts Holding Company | 3,688,087 | |
134,300 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 14,296,235 | |
70,700 | Johnson & Johnson | 7,535,913 | ||
2,600 | * | Mallinckrodt, PLC | 234,390 | |
17,700 | McKesson Corporation | 3,445,659 | ||
86,000 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 5,098,080 | ||
85,300 | * | Mylan, Inc. | 3,880,297 | |
48,200 | Omnicare, Inc. | 3,000,932 | ||
215,534 | Pfizer, Inc. | 6,373,340 | ||
43,900 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 983,799 | ||
21,600 | * | Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. | 3,374,784 | |
68,100 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 8,287,770 | ||
27,972 | Zoetis, Inc. | 1,033,565 | ||
85,745,092 | ||||
Industrials—7.1% | ||||
45,600 | 3M Company | 6,460,608 | ||
116,900 | ADT Corporation | 4,145,274 | ||
63,100 | Altra Industrial Motion Corporation | 1,839,996 | ||
22,300 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 1,248,800 | |
19,300 | Caterpillar, Inc. | 1,911,279 | ||
22,600 | Dover Corporation | 1,815,458 | ||
67,300 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 2,728,342 | |
98,000 | General Electric Company | 2,510,760 | ||
41,500 | Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 3,045,270 | ||
53,500 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 4,981,920 | ||
55,500 | ITT Corporation | 2,494,170 | ||
4,800 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 877,344 | ||
37,000 | Ryder System, Inc. | 3,328,890 | ||
22,700 | Snap-On, Inc. | 2,748,516 | ||
48,200 | * | TAL International Group, Inc. | 1,988,250 | |
27,800 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 865,136 | ||
86,700 | Textron, Inc. | 3,120,333 |
100 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Industrials (continued) | ||||
71,375 | Tyco International, Ltd. | $ 3,181,184 | ||
18,200 | * | United Rentals, Inc. | 2,022,020 | |
39,200 | United Technologies Corporation | 4,139,520 | ||
55,453,070 | ||||
Information Technology—11.9% | ||||
700 | * | Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd. (ADR) | 62,195 | |
91,000 | Apple, Inc. | 9,168,250 | ||
86,400 | * | ARRIS Group, Inc. | 2,449,872 | |
57,500 | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 5,002,500 | ||
51,800 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 1,678,320 | |
103,300 | CDW Corporation | 3,207,465 | ||
226,400 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 5,698,488 | ||
25,600 | * | eBay, Inc. | 1,449,728 | |
221,300 | EMC Corporation | 6,475,238 | ||
123,700 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 4,387,639 | ||
150,500 | Intel Corporation | 5,240,410 | ||
38,900 | International Business Machines Corporation | 7,384,387 | ||
69,200 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 983,332 | ||
130,300 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | 2,886,145 | ||
162,000 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 3,320,190 | ||
97,600 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 3,598,512 | ||
159,700 | Microsoft Corporation | 7,403,692 | ||
61,100 | * | NXP Semiconductors NV | 4,181,073 | |
91,600 | Oracle Corporation | 3,506,448 | ||
37,900 | * | PTC, Inc. | 1,398,510 | |
73,200 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 5,473,164 | ||
117,700 | Symantec Corporation | 2,767,127 | ||
23,500 | * | Synaptics, Inc. | 1,720,200 | |
58,600 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 3,239,994 | ||
19,900 | * | Yahoo!, Inc. | 810,925 | |
93,493,804 | ||||
Materials—2.7% | ||||
25,600 | Celanese Corporation – Series “A” | 1,498,112 | ||
56,000 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 2,648,240 | ||
111,300 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 3,633,945 | ||
51,200 | International Paper Company | 2,444,288 | ||
62,100 | LyondellBasell Industries NV – Class “A” | 6,747,786 |
101 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares or | ||||
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Materials (continued) | ||||
10,200 | Praxair, Inc. | $ 1,315,800 | ||
34,700 | RPM International, Inc. | 1,588,566 | ||
71,500 | * | Trinseo SA | 1,124,695 | |
21,001,432 | ||||
Telecommunication Services—1.2% | ||||
120,600 | AT&T, Inc. | 4,249,944 | ||
110,600 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 5,528,894 | ||
9,778,838 | ||||
Utilities—.4% | ||||
48,900 | * | Dynegy, Inc. | 1,411,254 | |
39,300 | NiSource, Inc. | 1,610,514 | ||
3,021,768 | ||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $277,460,022) | 460,328,375 | |||
CORPORATE BONDS—24.1% | ||||
Agriculture—.2% | ||||
$ 1,000M | Cargill, Inc., 6%, 11/27/2017 (a) | 1,130,371 | ||
Automotive—.4% | ||||
1,000M | Daimler Finance NA, LLC, 2.95%, 1/11/2017 (a) | 1,035,492 | ||
2,000M | Johnson Controls, Inc., 5%, 3/30/2020 | 2,212,242 | ||
3,247,734 | ||||
Chemicals—1.0% | ||||
2,000M | CF Industries, Inc., 3.45%, 6/1/2023 | 1,964,216 | ||
2,000M | Dow Chemical Co., 4.25%, 11/15/2020 | 2,136,640 | ||
1,000M | Lubrizol Corp., 8.875%, 2/1/2019 | 1,263,495 | ||
2,000M | LyondellBasell Industries NV, 6%, 11/15/2021 | 2,335,412 | ||
7,699,763 | ||||
Consumer Durables—.2% | ||||
1,500M | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4.7%, 8/15/2020 | 1,610,195 | ||
Energy—2.6% | ||||
1,500M | Canadian Oil Sands, Ltd., 7.75%, 5/15/2019 (a) | 1,815,565 | ||
2,000M | Continental Resources, Inc., 5%, 9/15/2022 | 2,112,500 | ||
1,000M | DCP Midstream, LLC, 9.75%, 3/15/2019 (a) | 1,281,710 | ||
1,000M | DCP Midstream Operating, LP, 2.5%, 12/1/2017 | 1,021,132 |
102 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Energy (continued) | ||||
$ 2,000M | Enbridge Energy Partners, LP, 4.2%, 9/15/2021 | $ 2,114,112 | ||
1,000M | Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, LP, 3.45%, 2/15/2023 | 957,211 | ||
1,500M | Nabors Industries, Inc., 6.15%, 2/15/2018 | 1,694,132 | ||
1,000M | ONEOK Partners, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2022 | 976,817 | ||
1,000M | Petrobras International Finance Co., 5.375%, 1/27/2021 | 1,015,820 | ||
1,000M | Reliance Holdings USA, Inc., 4.5%, 10/19/2020 (a) | 1,047,569 | ||
1,500M | Spectra Energy Capital, LLC, 6.2%, 4/15/2018 | 1,696,649 | ||
1,000M | Suncor Energy, Inc., 6.1%, 6/1/2018 | 1,143,906 | ||
1,500M | Valero Energy Corp., 9.375%, 3/15/2019 | 1,930,740 | ||
1,500M | Weatherford International, Inc., 6.35%, 6/15/2017 | 1,683,077 | ||
20,490,940 | ||||
Financial Services—3.8% | ||||
1,500M | Aflac, Inc., 8.5%, 5/15/2019 | 1,900,333 | ||
American Express Co.: | ||||
500M | 6.15%, 8/28/2017 | 563,319 | ||
1,000M | 7%, 3/19/2018 | 1,165,187 | ||
1,000M | 4.05%, 12/3/2042 | 950,081 | ||
American International Group, Inc.: | ||||
750M | 8.25%, 8/15/2018 | 916,871 | ||
1,000M | 6.4%, 12/15/2020 | 1,191,275 | ||
1,500M | Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 5.3%, 3/15/2020 | 1,701,043 | ||
1,000M | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 3.4%, 1/31/2022 | 1,030,568 | ||
2,000M | BlackRock, Inc., 5%, 12/10/2019 | 2,262,728 | ||
1,000M | CoBank ACB, 7.875%, 4/16/2018 (a) | 1,184,863 | ||
ERAC USA Finance, LLC: | ||||
1,000M | 6.375%, 10/15/2017 (a) | 1,138,402 | ||
1,000M | 4.5%, 8/16/2021 (a) | 1,084,524 | ||
1,000M | 3.3%, 10/15/2022 (a) | 992,820 | ||
2,000M | Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC, 8.125%, 1/15/2020 | 2,502,456 | ||
General Electric Capital Corp.: | ||||
1,000M | 5.625%, 9/15/2017 | 1,118,166 | ||
500M | 5.625%, 5/1/2018 | 565,548 | ||
2,000M | 5.3%, 2/11/2021 | 2,255,936 | ||
500M | 6.75%, 3/15/2032 | 661,071 | ||
1,000M | Harley-Davidson Funding Corp., 5.75%, 12/15/2014 (a) | 1,010,648 | ||
1,000M | Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 4.95%, 5/1/2022 (a) | 1,078,300 | ||
1,000M | Protective Life Corp., 7.375%, 10/15/2019 | 1,224,187 | ||
2,000M | Prudential Financial, Inc., 7.375%, 6/15/2019 | 2,438,216 | ||
1,000M | Siemens Financieringsmaatschappij NV, 5.75%, 10/17/2016 (a) | 1,097,295 | ||
30,033,837 |
103 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Financials—4.7% | ||||
Bank of America Corp.: | ||||
$ 3,500M | 5.65%, 5/1/2018 | $ 3,896,228 | ||
1,000M | 5%, 5/13/2021 | 1,099,715 | ||
Barclays Bank, PLC: | ||||
2,500M | 6.75%, 5/22/2019 | 2,974,400 | ||
1,000M | 5.125%, 1/8/2020 | 1,123,396 | ||
3,500M | Citigroup, Inc., 6.125%, 11/21/2017 | 3,951,220 | ||
1,000M | Deutsche Bank AG London, 3.7%, 5/30/2024 | 993,317 | ||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: | ||||
2,600M | 5.375%, 3/15/2020 | 2,896,829 | ||
1,000M | 3.625%, 1/22/2023 | 994,444 | ||
1,000M | 6.125%, 2/15/2033 | 1,200,292 | ||
JPMorgan Chase & Co.: | ||||
3,000M | 6%, 1/15/2018 | 3,378,084 | ||
1,000M | 4.5%, 1/24/2022 | 1,073,101 | ||
Morgan Stanley: | ||||
2,550M | 6.625%, 4/1/2018 | 2,922,632 | ||
2,000M | 5.5%, 7/28/2021 | 2,255,852 | ||
1,500M | SunTrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 9/11/2017 | 1,685,784 | ||
1,000M | UBS AG, 4.875%, 8/4/2020 | 1,114,623 | ||
2,000M | U.S. Bancorp, 3.6%, 9/11/2024 | 1,980,540 | ||
Wells Fargo & Co.: | ||||
1,500M | 4.6%, 4/1/2021 | 1,645,047 | ||
1,500M | 3.45%, 2/13/2023 | 1,475,550 | ||
36,661,054 | ||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—2.2% | ||||
1,500M | Altria Group, Inc., 9.7%, 11/10/2018 | 1,934,007 | ||
1,000M | Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, 4.625%, 2/1/2044 | 1,017,047 | ||
Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc.: | ||||
2,000M | 6.875%, 11/15/2019 | 2,402,520 | ||
500M | 5.375%, 1/15/2020 | 564,750 | ||
1,000M | Bottling Group, LLC, 5.125%, 1/15/2019 | 1,120,087 | ||
1,750M | Bunge Ltd. Finance Corp., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 2,177,647 | ||
1,500M | Diageo Capital, PLC, 5.75%, 10/23/2017 | 1,686,387 | ||
1,500M | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 6.82%, 5/1/2018 | 1,746,226 | ||
1,000M | Ingredion, Inc., 4.625%, 11/1/2020 | 1,072,616 | ||
1,000M | Philip Morris International, Inc., 5.65%, 5/16/2018 | 1,131,886 |
104 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco (continued) | ||||
SABMiller Holdings, Inc.: | ||||
$ 1,500M | 3.75%, 1/15/2022 (a) | $ 1,531,346 | ||
1,000M | 4.95%, 1/15/2042 (a) | 1,044,587 | ||
17,429,106 | ||||
Forest Products/Container—.2% | ||||
1,000M | Rock-Tenn Co., 4.9%, 3/1/2022 | 1,073,592 | ||
Health Care—1.4% | ||||
2,000M | Biogen IDEC, Inc., 6.875%, 3/1/2018 | 2,322,878 | ||
2,500M | Express Scripts Holding Co., 4.75%, 11/15/2021 | 2,734,345 | ||
1,000M | Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings, 3.75%, 8/23/2022 | 1,013,096 | ||
1,000M | Mylan, Inc., 3.125%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 957,000 | ||
1,000M | Novartis Capital Corp., 4.4%, 5/6/2044 | 1,044,237 | ||
1,000M | Novartis Securities Investments, Ltd., 5.125%, 2/10/2019 | 1,124,163 | ||
1,000M | Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 6.4%, 7/1/2017 | 1,130,115 | ||
577M | Roche Holdings, Inc., 6%, 3/1/2019 (a) | 669,346 | ||
10,995,180 | ||||
Information Technology—.4% | ||||
1,500M | Harris Corp., 4.4%, 12/15/2020 | 1,597,278 | ||
1,500M | Symantec Corp., 3.95%, 6/15/2022 | 1,520,520 | ||
3,117,798 | ||||
Manufacturing—.9% | ||||
2,000M | CRH America, Inc., 8.125%, 7/15/2018 | 2,416,620 | ||
1,000M | Ingersoll-Rand Global Holdings Co., Ltd., 6.875%, 8/15/2018 | 1,172,190 | ||
1,000M | John Deere Capital Corp., 5.35%, 4/3/2018 | 1,119,069 | ||
2,000M | Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.55%, 10/1/2017 | 2,278,950 | ||
6,986,829 | ||||
Media-Broadcasting—.9% | ||||
1,000M | British Sky Broadcasting Group, PLC, 9.5%, 11/15/2018 (a) | 1,273,387 | ||
1,750M | CBS Corp., 3.375%, 3/1/2022 | 1,755,239 | ||
Comcast Corp.: | ||||
2,000M | 5.15%, 3/1/2020 | 2,269,574 | ||
1,000M | 4.25%, 1/15/2033 | 1,015,350 | ||
1,000M | DirecTV Holdings, LLC, 3.8%, 3/15/2022 | 1,018,011 | ||
7,331,561 |
105 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Media-Diversified—.1% | ||||
$ 1,000M | McGraw-Hill Financial, Inc., 5.9%, 11/15/2017 | $ 1,099,216 | ||
Metals/Mining—1.2% | ||||
1,500M | Alcoa, Inc., 6.15%, 8/15/2020 | 1,655,290 | ||
1,500M | ArcelorMittal, 6.125%, 6/1/2018 | 1,593,750 | ||
1,000M | Glencore Finance Canada, Ltd., 4.95%, 11/15/2021 (a) | 1,065,765 | ||
1,500M | Newmont Mining Corp., 5.125%, 10/1/2019 | 1,630,652 | ||
1,500M | Rio Tinto Finance USA, Ltd., 3.75%, 9/20/2021 | 1,558,461 | ||
1,500M | Vale Overseas, Ltd., 5.625%, 9/15/2019 | 1,682,510 | ||
9,186,428 | ||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—.9% | ||||
1,500M | Boston Properties, LP, 5.875%, 10/15/2019 | 1,729,945 | ||
1,500M | Digital Realty Trust, LP, 5.25%, 3/15/2021 | 1,630,255 | ||
HCP, Inc.: | ||||
500M | 6.7%, 1/30/2018 | 575,622 | ||
1,000M | 5.375%, 2/1/2021 | 1,117,346 | ||
1,500M | Ventas Realty, LP, 4.75%, 6/1/2021 | 1,635,360 | ||
6,688,528 | ||||
1,500M | GAP, Inc., 5.95%, 4/12/2021 | 1,708,232 | ||
1,000M | Home Depot, Inc., 5.875%, 12/16/2036 | 1,235,422 | ||
2,943,654 | ||||
Telecommunications—.3% | ||||
1,000M | AT&T, Inc., 6.5%, 9/1/2037 | 1,218,899 | ||
1,000M | Verizon Communications, Inc., 5.15%, 9/15/2023 | 1,108,172 | ||
2,327,071 | ||||
Transportation—.7% | ||||
2,000M | Burlington North Santa Fe, LLC, 5.15%, 9/1/2043 | 2,204,082 | ||
1,000M | Con-way, Inc., 7.25%, 1/15/2018 | 1,151,577 | ||
1,000M | GATX Corp., 4.75%, 6/15/2022 | 1,082,787 | ||
1,000M | Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP, 4.875%, 7/11/2022 (a) | 1,076,389 | ||
5,514,835 | ||||
Utilities—1.5% | ||||
925M | Arizona Public Service Co., 8.75%, 3/1/2019 | 1,176,178 | ||
1,000M | Atmos Energy Corp., 8.5%, 3/15/2019 | 1,255,361 | ||
1,000M | E.ON International Finance BV, 5.8%, 4/30/2018 (a) | 1,130,191 |
106 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Utilities (continued) | ||||
$ 1,000M | Electricite de France SA, 6.5%, 1/26/2019 (a) | $ 1,173,551 | ||
1,500M | Exelon Generation Co., LLC, 5.2%, 10/1/2019 | 1,665,017 | ||
265M | Great River Energy Co., 5.829%, 7/1/2017 (a) | 285,417 | ||
1,000M | National Fuel Gas Co., 8.75%, 5/1/2019 | 1,243,764 | ||
2,000M | Ohio Power Co., 5.375%, 10/1/2021 | 2,320,560 | ||
1,000M | Sempra Energy, 9.8%, 2/15/2019 | 1,304,357 | ||
11,554,396 | ||||
Waste Management—.1% | ||||
1,000M | Republic Services, Inc., 3.8%, 5/15/2018 | 1,063,280 | ||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $180,998,978) | 188,185,368 | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—4.0% | ||||
U.S. Treasury Notes: | ||||
19,500M | 1.375%, 12/31/2018 | 19,304,239 | ||
12,000M | 0.625%, 1/15/2024 (TIPS) | 12,322,839 | ||
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $32,033,604) | 31,627,078 | |||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | ||||
SECURITIES—3.3% | ||||
Fannie Mae—2.4% | ||||
2,031M | 3%, 3/1/2027 – 7/1/2027 | 2,099,321 | ||
3,010M | 3.5%, 10/1/2025 – 8/1/2043 | 3,183,036 | ||
3,777M | 4%, 12/1/2040 – 10/1/2041 | 3,988,426 | ||
3,778M | 5%, 3/1/2034 – 11/1/2040 | 4,202,645 | ||
3,077M | 5.5%, 5/1/2033 – 10/1/2039 | 3,438,405 | ||
555M | 6%, 5/1/2036 – 8/1/2037 | 632,494 | ||
499M | 6.5%, 11/1/2033 – 6/1/2036 | 567,945 | ||
656M | 7%, 3/1/2032 – 8/1/2032 | 728,774 | ||
18,841,046 | ||||
Freddie Mac—.9% | ||||
2,297M | 3.5%, 9/1/2032 – 7/1/2044 | 2,367,840 | ||
890M | 4%, 11/1/2040 | 950,044 | ||
1,165M | 4.5%, 10/1/2040 | 1,270,689 | ||
1,868M | 5.5%, 5/1/2038 – 10/1/2039 | 2,104,781 | ||
221M | 6%, 9/1/2032 | 248,426 | ||
6,941,780 | ||||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $24,941,822) | 25,782,826 |
107 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY OBLIGATIONS—.9% | ||||||
Federal Farm Credit Bank: | ||||||
$ 2,000M | 2.45%, 8/5/2020 | $ 1,997,332 | ||||
1,000M | 2.79%, 11/12/2020 | 1,001,796 | ||||
Freddie Mac: | ||||||
1,000M | 5.125%, 10/18/2016 | 1,090,422 | ||||
1,000M | 1.25%, 5/12/2017 | 1,007,364 | ||||
1,500M | 5.125%, 11/17/2017 | 1,676,853 | ||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $6,709,316) | 6,773,767 | |||||
MUNICIPAL BONDS—.3% | ||||||
1,000M | University of Massachusetts Bldg. Auth. Rev., 2.108%, 11/1/2019 | 1,008,300 | ||||
1,750M | Yale University, Connecticut, 2.086%, 4/15/2019 | 1,755,511 | ||||
Total Value of Municipal Bonds (cost $2,750,000) | 2,763,811 | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | ||||||
OBLIGATIONS—8.1% | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | ||||||
5,000M | 0.03%, 10/22/2014 | 4,999,912 | ||||
12,500M | 0.003%, 10/29/2014 | 12,499,971 | ||||
7,000M | 0.02%, 11/3/2014 | 6,999,872 | ||||
17,500M | 0.003%, 11/4/2014 | 17,499,950 | ||||
8,600M | 0.02%, 11/14/2014 | 8,599,790 | ||||
4,000M | 0.015%, 11/21/2014 | 3,999,915 | ||||
8,500M | 0.025%, 11/21/2014 | 8,499,699 | ||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||
Agency Obligations (cost $63,099,109) | 63,099,109 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $587,992,851) | 99.5 | % | 778,560,334 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .5 | 3,801,127 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 782,361,461 |
* | Non-income producing |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ADR | American Depositary Receipts |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
TIPS | Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities |
108 |
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 460,328,375 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 460,328,375 | ||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 188,185,368 | — | 188,185,368 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 31,627,078 | — | 31,627,078 | ||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 25,782,826 | — | 25,782,826 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 6,773,767 | — | 6,773,767 | ||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 2,763,811 | — | 2,763,811 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 63,099,109 | — | 63,099,109 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 460,328,375 | $ | 318,231,959 | $ | — | $ | 778,560,334 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks and corporate bonds.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 109 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
EQUITY INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Equity Income Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 14.48% for Class A shares, 13.49% for Class B shares, 14.57% for Advisor Class shares and 14.88% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 13.9 cents per share on Class A shares, 5.2 cents per share on Class B shares, 14.6 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 16.7 cents per share on Institutional Class shares. In addition, the Fund distributed capital gains of 15.2 cents per share on each class of shares.
The Fund primarily invests in dividend-paying stocks and this year, with interest rates moving lower, the Fund’s high-yielding stocks performed very well, outperforming the high dividend yielding stocks of its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The Fund under-performed the Index in the non-dividend-paying large-cap stocks, primarily technology, which had a very strong year. The Fund was also disadvantaged in its small-cap weighting versus the benchmark. While the benchmark has virtually no small-cap allocations, the Fund has a healthy allocation to small-caps, which underperformed both large- and mid-cap stocks in the fiscal year.
The Fund’s absolute performance is attributable to positive stock selection in the health-care and technology sectors. Actavis PLC has been on an acquisition spree over the past year and the acquired earnings and cash flow have led to healthy stock returns. The Fund acquired the stock when one of our previous holdings, Warner Chilcott, was bought by Actavis in an all-stock deal. In February of this year Actavis acquired Forest Labs in a highly accretive deal that should add to earnings growth with new products and higher cost saves. Johnson and Johnson, a top ten holding of the Fund, has benefited from strong pharmaceutical sales this year. The company has beaten market expectations based on a very strong pipeline of drugs and a consumer business that has rebounded from some manufacturing issues it faced last year.
In technology, Intel surprised many investors this year with its strong performance. With the growth of tablets and iPads, many thought the PC was a thing of the past but a corporate upgrade cycle has brought PC demand above expectations. Growth in servers that power cloud-based technologies has far exceeded market expectations. Apple’s latest generation of their iPhone has generated great demand as the consumer seems to be craving the larger screen size, but Apple is also seeing very strong demand for their PCs and that is also driving higher earnings and cash flow. You may recall that in last year’s letter we talked about purchasing stock in Apple after the stock price was down significantly in 2013. Our patience has been rewarded with strong price appreciation, a dividend increase and another buyback of $30 billion that was announced earlier this year.
On a relative basis, the Fund outperformed the benchmark in the consumer discretionary and utility sectors and underperformed the benchmark in the technology and industrial sector.
110 |
While Apple performed well on an absolute basis, it was an area of underperformance on a relative basis compared to the S&P 500. The current weighting for Apple in the S&P 500 is over 3% and therefore caused a significant relative underperformance for the Fund.
The Fund also underperformed in the technology sector because of its mandate to invest primarily in dividend-paying stocks, so the Fund didn’t participate in the strong stock performance of Google or Facebook, which do not pay a dividend and were strong contributors to the benchmark’s performance.
In industrials, the Fund’s small- and mid-cap names did not perform to the expectations we had. ADT, the home security provider, suffered from higher than expected turnover of customers, sales disruptions and some higher cost as installation of new products had a longer learning curve for their installation crews. With the higher margins the new products offer the company and the sales disruptions appearing to be behind them, we think the business is stabilizing and should offer healthy returns with a nice dividend yield going forward.
In consumer discretionary, the Fund had a strong year and great returns from Hanes-brands. The apparel maker recently closed on two acquisitions that provide it with significant runway for future earnings growth and tremendous free cash flow. It acquired Maidenform, which had strong brands but a poor cost structure, and DBApparel, which gave it a much-needed gateway into Europe. We believe both companies offer Hanes-brands significant synergies as they will be able to improve margins using Hanesbrands best in class manufacturing, distribution and technology. Hanesbrands also raised the dividend by 50% this year and we expect more dividend growth as the cash flow from these acquisitions continues to grow.
As we look forward, we believe dividend-paying stocks should be a focus for any investor. Dividend-paying stocks tend to outperform non-dividend-paying stocks when interest rates are either rising or falling. If we look at stock returns since the 1970’s, dividend-paying stocks have outperformed the S&P 500 Index. The Fund is focused on finding those stocks that not only provide yield and stability but provide dividend growth and appreciation.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
111 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.20% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,039.27 | $ 6.13 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.05 | $ 6.07 | |
Class B Shares | 2.04% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,034.99 | $10.41 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.84 | $10.30 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.80% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,040.29 | $ 4.09 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.06 | $ 4.05 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.80% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,041.40 | $ 4.09 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.06 | $ 4.05 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total market value of investments.
112 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Equity Income Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 14.48% | 13.49% | 14.57% | 14.88% |
Five Years | 12.70% | 11.85% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 7.03% | 6.38% | 15.18% | 15.44% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 7.88% | 9.49% | 14.57% | 14.88% |
Five Years | 11.36% | 11.59% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 6.40% | 6.38% | 15.18% | 15.44% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Equity Income Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/04 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
113 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Advisor Class were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 12.61%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
114 |
Portfolio of Investments
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—93.2% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—11.7% | ||||
94,500 | * | Belmond, Ltd. – Class “A” | $ 1,101,870 | |
40,000 | BorgWarner, Inc. | 2,104,400 | ||
50,568 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 2,705,388 | ||
94,912 | CBS Outdoor Americas, Inc. | 2,841,665 | ||
138,000 | Comcast Corporation – Special Shares “A” | 7,383,000 | ||
79,300 | CST Brands, Inc. | 2,850,835 | ||
50,000 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 3,067,000 | ||
197,800 | Extended Stay America, Inc. | 4,695,772 | ||
100,000 | Ford Motor Company | 1,479,000 | ||
50,000 | Hanesbrands, Inc. | 5,372,000 | ||
40,800 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 4,000,032 | ||
42,200 | Home Depot, Inc. | 3,871,428 | ||
45,000 | Lear Corporation | 3,888,450 | ||
41,100 | McDonald’s Corporation | 3,896,691 | ||
82,400 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 2,835,384 | ||
219,400 | Regal Entertainment Group – Class “A” | 4,361,672 | ||
67,133 | Time Warner, Inc. | 5,049,073 | ||
15,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 1,035,600 | ||
26,900 | Walt Disney Company | 2,394,907 | ||
64,934,167 | ||||
Consumer Staples—9.1% | ||||
200,000 | Altria Group, Inc. | 9,188,000 | ||
64,200 | Coca-Cola Company | 2,738,772 | ||
91,700 | CVS Health Corporation | 7,298,403 | ||
25,000 | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. | 1,607,750 | ||
23,300 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 2,506,381 | ||
73,066 | Kraft Foods Group, Inc. | 4,120,922 | ||
62,400 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,809,872 | ||
63,500 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 5,911,215 | ||
87,300 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 7,280,820 | ||
62,900 | Procter & Gamble Company | 5,267,246 | ||
29,400 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 2,248,218 | ||
50,977,599 | ||||
Energy—9.4% | ||||
79,400 | Chevron Corporation | 9,474,008 | ||
101,500 | ConocoPhillips | 7,766,780 | ||
48,000 | Devon Energy Corporation | 3,272,640 | ||
56,300 | Enable Midstream Partners, LP | 1,387,232 |
115 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Energy (continued) | ||||
32,500 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | $ 1,342,575 | ||
47,400 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 4,457,970 | ||
69,600 | Halliburton Company | 4,489,896 | ||
119,600 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 4,495,764 | ||
27,700 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 2,345,359 | ||
64,500 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 6,201,675 | ||
50,500 | Royal Dutch Shell, PLC – Class “A” (ADR) | 3,844,565 | ||
86,300 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 3,119,745 | ||
52,198,209 | ||||
Financials—15.2% | ||||
52,600 | ACE, Ltd. | 5,516,162 | ||
45,000 | American Express Company | 3,939,300 | ||
16,300 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 2,011,094 | ||
123,000 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 2,889,270 | ||
142,200 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 3,165,372 | ||
33,556 | Chubb Corporation | 3,056,281 | ||
6,400 | * | ��Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 149,888 | |
65,000 | Discover Financial Services | 4,185,350 | ||
275,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 6,371,750 | ||
39,600 | Invesco, Ltd. | 1,563,408 | ||
40,000 | iShares S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index Fund (ETF) | 1,580,800 | ||
167,800 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 10,108,272 | ||
135,000 | MetLife, Inc. | 7,252,200 | ||
88,700 | Oritani Financial Corporation | 1,249,783 | ||
52,900 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 4,527,182 | ||
56,500 | Protective Life Corporation | 3,921,665 | ||
56,700 | Select Income REIT (REIT) | 1,363,635 | ||
249,300 | Sterling Bancorp | 3,188,547 | ||
27,800 | Travelers Companies, Inc. | 2,611,532 | ||
93,300 | U.S. Bancorp | 3,902,739 | ||
108,500 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 2,202,550 | ||
173,500 | Wells Fargo & Company | 8,999,445 | ||
130,500 | Westfield Financial, Inc. | 921,330 | ||
84,677,555 |
116 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Health Care—13.9% | ||||
43,600 | Abbott Laboratories | $ 1,813,324 | ||
141,100 | AbbVie, Inc. | 8,149,936 | ||
20,240 | * | Actavis, PLC | 4,883,507 | |
54,600 | Baxter International, Inc. | 3,918,642 | ||
50,000 | Covidien, PLC | 4,325,500 | ||
57,400 | GlaxoSmithKline, PLC (ADR) | 2,638,678 | ||
96,400 | Johnson & Johnson | 10,275,276 | ||
22,000 | McKesson Corporation | 4,282,740 | ||
195,211 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 11,572,108 | ||
65,000 | Omnicare, Inc. | 4,046,900 | ||
15,900 | Perrigo Company, PLC | 2,388,021 | ||
394,224 | Pfizer, Inc. | 11,657,204 | ||
45,700 | * | Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. | 1,479,309 | |
25,500 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 3,103,350 | ||
81,952 | Zoetis, Inc. | 3,028,127 | ||
77,562,622 | ||||
Industrials—10.7% | ||||
38,600 | 3M Company | 5,468,848 | ||
52,000 | A.O. Smith Corporation | 2,458,560 | ||
99,637 | ADT Corporation | 3,533,128 | ||
48,000 | Altra Industrial Motion Corporation | 1,399,680 | ||
30,000 | Eaton Corporation, PLC | 1,901,100 | ||
30,000 | G&K Services, Inc. – Class “A” | 1,661,400 | ||
30,000 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 1,216,200 | |
17,800 | General Dynamics Corporation | 2,262,202 | ||
391,400 | General Electric Company | 10,027,668 | ||
57,100 | Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 4,189,998 | ||
61,900 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 5,764,128 | ||
91,450 | ITT Corporation | 4,109,763 | ||
48,700 | Kforce, Inc. | 953,059 | ||
16,372 | Pentair, PLC | 1,072,202 | ||
20,000 | Snap-On, Inc. | 2,421,600 | ||
64,075 | Tyco International, Ltd. | 2,855,823 | ||
31,700 | United Parcel Service, Inc. – Class “B” | 3,115,793 | ||
47,500 | United Technologies Corporation | 5,016,000 | ||
59,427,152 |
117 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Information Technology—11.3% | ||||
74,900 | Apple, Inc. | $ 7,546,175 | ||
21,600 | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1,794,528 | ||
40,000 | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 3,480,000 | ||
317,100 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 7,981,407 | ||
75,000 | EMC Corporation | 2,194,500 | ||
264,700 | Intel Corporation | 9,216,854 | ||
71,700 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 1,018,857 | ||
185,000 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | 4,097,750 | ||
144,100 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 2,953,330 | ||
76,800 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 2,831,616 | ||
90,000 | Microchip Technology, Inc. | 4,250,700 | ||
220,000 | Microsoft Corporation | 10,199,200 | ||
42,800 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 3,200,156 | ||
39,200 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 2,167,368 | ||
62,932,441 | ||||
Materials—4.2% | ||||
26,600 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 1,257,914 | ||
76,900 | Dow Chemical Company | 4,032,636 | ||
60,100 | DuPont (E.I.) de Nemours & Company | 4,312,776 | ||
86,200 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 2,814,430 | ||
85,900 | International Paper Company | 4,100,866 | ||
41,700 | LyondellBasell Industries NV – Class “A” | 4,531,122 | ||
25,000 | Westlake Chemical Corporation | 2,164,750 | ||
23,214,494 | ||||
Telecommunication Services—3.0% | ||||
165,730 | AT&T, Inc. | 5,840,325 | ||
211,800 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 10,587,882 | ||
16,428,207 | ||||
Utilities—4.7% | ||||
64,500 | American Electric Power Company, Inc. | 3,367,545 | ||
40,000 | Dominion Resources, Inc. | 2,763,600 | ||
35,000 | Duke Energy Corporation | 2,616,950 | ||
35,100 | NextEra Energy, Inc. | 3,295,188 | ||
105,900 | NiSource, Inc. | 4,339,782 |
118 |
Shares or | ||||||
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Utilities (continued) | ||||||
69,000 | Portland General Electric Company | $ 2,216,280 | ||||
135,000 | PPL Corporation | 4,433,400 | ||||
76,200 | Vectren Corporation | 3,040,380 | ||||
26,073,125 | ||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $368,621,843) | 518,425,571 | |||||
PREFERRED STOCKS—.4% | ||||||
Financials | ||||||
50,500 | Digital Realty Trust, Inc., Series G, 5.875%, 2049 (REIT) | 1,124,130 | ||||
46,000 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc., Series F, 7.125%, 2049 (REIT) | 1,184,730 | ||||
Total Value of Preferred Stocks (cost $2,403,576) | 2,308,860 | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | ||||||
OBLIGATIONS—6.1% | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | ||||||
$ 3,000M | 0.003%, 10/29/2014 | 2,999,993 | ||||
18,000M | 0.02%, 11/3/2014 | 17,999,670 | ||||
6,000M | 0.003%, 11/4/2014 | 5,999,983 | ||||
3,000M | 0.015%, 11/21/2014 | 2,999,936 | ||||
2,600M | 0.04%, 12/12/2014 | 2,599,792 | ||||
1,210M | 0.03%, 12/19/2014 | 1,209,921 | ||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||
Agency Obligations (cost $33,809,295) | 33,809,295 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $404,834,714) | 99.7 | % | 554,543,726 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .3 | 1,718,022 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 556,261,748 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ADR | American Depositary Receipts |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
119 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 518,425,571 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 518,425,571 | ||||
Preferred Stocks | 2,308,860 | — | — | 2,308,860 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 33,809,295 | — | 33,809,295 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 520,734,431 | $ | 33,809,295 | $ | — | $ | 554,543,726 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks |
and preferred stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
120 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Growth & Income Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 15.26% for Class A shares, 14.32% for Class B shares, 15.67% for Advisor Class shares and 15.75% for Institutional Class shares. The Fund declared dividends of 19.7 cents per share on Class A shares, 19.9 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 28.4 cents per share on Institutional Class shares. The Fund did not declare a dividend on Class B shares. The Fund declared capital gains of 68.4 cents per share on each class of shares.
During the period under review, the Fund’s performance was driven by a combination of gradually improving economic conditions in the U.S., accommodative monetary policy from the Federal Reserve (“Fed”), and improving corporate fundamentals. Increased market volatility towards the end of the period under review also impacted the Fund’s results.
Investor sentiment continued to be strong, with stocks benefitting from solid corporate earnings growth and, to a lesser degree, continued positive re-rating of market-valuation metrics.
Despite numerous challenges throughout the year — including worries over when the Fed would end its bond buying program and raise interest rates; a very slow start to the year as a combination of poor weather and slow demand led to the U.S. economy contracting in the first quarter of 2014; slowing growth in Europe and emerging economies; and numerous global flashpoints — U.S. equity markets shrugged off concerns and continued to deliver solid double digit returns.
This year’s market results were broadly positive overall, with all market sectors participating. Unlike last year where small- and mid-cap stocks led the way, larger-cap stocks set the pace this year as investors became more risk conscious given increased concerns about global growth. Companies with strong profitability, earnings growth, solid balance sheets and strong, free cash-flows led results. Mergers and acquisitions also continued to drive strong performance, especially in the healthcare sector.
These conditions produced a solid year for the Fund on an absolute basis, which continued to invest across all market capitalization segments, allocating 69% of its holdings to large-cap, 14% to mid-cap and 16% to small-cap stocks (ranges defined by Lipper) as of September 30, 2014.
The Fund did underperform its benchmark for the period under review. The large-and mid-cap segments provided positive returns, while the small-cap segment was down for the year. The large-cap segment exceeded the benchmark, while the
121 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
small- and mid-cap segments underperformed. The Fund benefited from good stock selection in the healthcare and information technology sectors, and suffered from weaker stock selection in the industrials and consumer staples sectors. In a period in which dividend-paying stocks underperformed non-dividend-paying stocks, the Fund was disadvantaged by its nearly 85% weighting towards stocks that pay dividends.
Specifically within sector performance, the Fund’s healthcare performers all benefit-ted from strong earnings results: Gilead Sciences, the biopharmaceutical company, was up 69% as the company delivered strong business results, received Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approval and strong initial orders for its blockbuster next-generation Hepatitis C drug called Sovaldi, and other drugs in the R&D pipeline showed promise in successful clinical trials. Actavis, a leading generic drug maker, was up 68%, as it reported strong earnings results. During the year, the firm benefit-ted from the acquisition of Warner Chilcott, announced and completed the acquisition of Forest Laboratories in an earnings accretive transaction, and was approached by Pfizer as a potential M&A target. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a leading smaller cap drug manufacturer, also had standout performance. The shares were up 134% as the company continued to deliver strong results, received positive FDA data on two potentially large drug opportunities, and was rumored to have been approached as a potential M&A target.
Within information technologies, several investments benefited the Fund’s performance:
Apple, Inc. was up 48% as solid earnings results, a $30 billion increase in the share repurchase program, a 7 for 1 stock split, and a better than expected launch of the company’s new iPhone lineup drove the stock higher. Semiconductor manufacturer Avago Technologies had a very strong year, gaining 101% as the company benefited from strong quarterly results, completed the accretive acquisition of competitor LSI Corp., and benefited from the company’s increased content on the very successful launch of the iPhone 6. Longtime holding Microsoft also produced positive returns for the Fund, as its shares were up 39%. Shares rallied as the company hired Satya Nadella to the CEO position, delivered strong results on better than expected PC demand, announced a large cost cutting plan and agreed to purchase game company Mojang.
The consumer staples and industrials sectors were the largest sources of underperformance for the year. After providing the Fund with its best performance in 2013, Nu Skin Enterprises was the source of the Fund’s largest underperformance as the stock was down 53%. After seeing robust sales and profit growth in the previous year, the direct seller of personal and nutritional products was forced to temporarily halt recruitment of new distributors in China following a government regulator announcing that it was looking into the company’s recruiting and sales practices. While the
122 |
company has been cleared, and has resumed sales recruitment in China, Nu Skin’s business results came in much lower than expected throughout the year as the direct seller has had a slower ramp up back to previous levels.
In the industrials sector, NeuStar —a services company that provides local number portability services in the U.S.—was down 50% as concerns about the company’s largest contract were confirmed as an advisory committee to the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) recommended that the contract be awarded to NeuStar’s competitor. This caused investors to fear that the company would lose the Local Number Portability Administration (“LNPA”) contract that makes up a material portion of the company’s profits. The shares were sold from the portfolio during the fiscal year.
To a lesser degree, the Fund underperformed the Index within the financial sector due to a longstanding underweight position in that sector. With increased costs from greater regulation, and ongoing effects from low interest rates due to the Fed’s quantitative easing, financial sector profit growth remains weak, impacting these companies’ ability to raise dividends and repurchase stock. We have opted to invest in other sectors which we believe provide better near-term opportunities.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
123 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.14% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,041.32 | $5.83 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.35 | $5.77 | |
Class B Shares | 1.91% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,037.48 | $9.76 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.49 | $9.65 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.73% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,043.51 | $3.74 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.41 | $3.70 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.74% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,043.57 | $3.79 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.36 | $3.75 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total market value of investments.
124 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Growth & Income Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 15.26% | 14.32% | 15.67% | 15.75% |
Five Years | 15.66% | 14.84% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 8.06% | 7.42% | 18.53% | 18.66% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 8.65% | 10.32% | 15.67% | 15.75% |
Five Years | 14.29% | 14.61% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 7.43% | 7.42% | 18.53% | 18.66% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Growth & Income Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/04 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
125 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Advisor Class and Institutional Class were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 15.97%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 16.26%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
** The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
126 |
Portfolio of Investments
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—99.7% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—14.4% | ||||
307,900 | * | Belmond, Ltd. – Class “A” | $ 3,590,114 | |
250,000 | BorgWarner, Inc. | 13,152,500 | ||
390,000 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 20,865,000 | ||
305,000 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 18,708,700 | ||
240,000 | Extended Stay America, Inc. | 5,697,600 | ||
500,000 | Ford Motor Company | 7,395,000 | ||
135,000 | GNC Holdings, Inc. – Class “A” | 5,229,900 | ||
150,000 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 14,706,000 | ||
180,000 | Home Depot, Inc. | 16,513,200 | ||
270,400 | * | Jarden Corporation | 16,253,744 | |
315,000 | L Brands, Inc. | 21,098,700 | ||
195,000 | Lear Corporation | 16,849,950 | ||
155,500 | Macy’s, Inc. | 9,046,990 | ||
140,000 | Magna International, Inc. | 13,287,400 | ||
65,000 | McDonald’s Corporation | 6,162,650 | ||
325,000 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 11,183,250 | ||
150,800 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 6,120,972 | ||
155,900 | Pier 1 Imports, Inc. | 1,853,651 | ||
21,700 | * | Steiner Leisure, Ltd. | 815,703 | |
110,000 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 11,137,500 | |
175,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 12,082,000 | ||
5,000 | * | Vince Holding Corporation | 151,300 | |
160,000 | Walt Disney Company | 14,244,800 | ||
140,000 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 11,376,400 | ||
257,523,024 | ||||
Consumer Staples—8.0% | ||||
450,000 | Altria Group, Inc. | 20,673,000 | ||
250,000 | Avon Products, Inc. | 3,150,000 | ||
432,600 | Coca-Cola Company | 18,454,716 | ||
270,000 | CVS Health Corporation | 21,489,300 | ||
140,000 | Herbalife, Ltd. | 6,125,000 | ||
318,300 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 14,333,049 | ||
165,000 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 15,359,850 | ||
275,000 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 22,935,000 | ||
105,000 | Procter & Gamble Company | 8,792,700 | ||
160,000 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 12,235,200 | ||
143,547,815 |
127 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Energy—9.8% | ||||
138,000 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | $ 13,998,720 | ||
144,800 | Chevron Corporation | 17,277,536 | ||
230,000 | ConocoPhillips | 17,599,600 | ||
245,000 | Devon Energy Corporation | 16,704,100 | ||
145,000 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 5,989,950 | ||
200,000 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 18,810,000 | ||
100,000 | Hess Corporation | 9,432,000 | ||
6,920 | Hugoton Royalty Trust | 62,072 | ||
300,000 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 11,277,000 | ||
169,999 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 14,393,815 | ||
160,000 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 12,176,000 | ||
93,100 | Noble Corporation, PLC | 2,068,682 | ||
100,000 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 9,615,000 | ||
115,000 | Phillips 66 | 9,350,650 | ||
48,300 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 4,911,627 | ||
350,200 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 12,659,730 | ||
176,326,482 | ||||
Financials—9.7% | ||||
230,000 | American Express Company | 20,134,200 | ||
140,000 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 17,273,200 | ||
532,500 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 11,853,450 | ||
31,200 | * | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 730,704 | |
275,000 | Discover Financial Services | 17,707,250 | ||
100,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 2,317,000 | ||
187,500 | * | Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,023,125 | |
85,000 | Invesco, Ltd. | 3,355,800 | ||
396,730 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 23,899,015 | ||
100,000 | Morgan Stanley | 3,457,000 | ||
165,000 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 14,120,700 | ||
50,000 | SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (ETF) | 9,851,000 | ||
100,000 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 3,786,000 | ||
540,000 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 7,462,800 | ||
355,000 | U.S. Bancorp | 14,849,650 | ||
385,100 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 7,817,530 | ||
237,050 | Wells Fargo & Company | 12,295,784 | ||
172,934,208 |
128 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Health Care—18.3% | ||||
400,000 | Abbott Laboratories | $ 16,636,000 | ||
370,000 | AbbVie, Inc. | 21,371,200 | ||
151,344 | * | Actavis, PLC | 36,516,280 | |
175,000 | Baxter International, Inc. | 12,559,750 | ||
75,000 | Covidien, PLC | 6,488,250 | ||
200,000 | * | Express Scripts Holding Company | 14,126,000 | |
520,000 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 55,354,000 | |
270,625 | Johnson & Johnson | 28,845,919 | ||
9,375 | * | Mallinckrodt, PLC | 845,156 | |
70,900 | McKesson Corporation | 13,802,103 | ||
325,000 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 19,266,000 | ||
330,000 | * | Mylan, Inc. | 15,011,700 | |
185,000 | Omnicare, Inc. | 11,518,100 | ||
829,301 | Pfizer, Inc. | 24,522,431 | ||
170,000 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 3,809,700 | ||
80,000 | * | Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. | 12,499,200 | |
260,000 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 31,642,000 | ||
103,905 | Zoetis, Inc. | 3,839,290 | ||
328,653,079 | ||||
Industrials—12.1% | ||||
175,000 | 3M Company | 24,794,000 | ||
450,000 | ADT Corporation | 15,957,000 | ||
250,000 | Altra Industrial Motion Corporation | 7,290,000 | ||
90,000 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 5,040,000 | |
77,000 | Caterpillar, Inc. | 7,625,310 | ||
90,000 | Dover Corporation | 7,229,700 | ||
255,000 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 10,337,700 | |
385,000 | General Electric Company | 9,863,700 | ||
160,000 | Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 11,740,800 | ||
209,700 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 19,527,264 | ||
215,000 | ITT Corporation | 9,662,100 | ||
20,000 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 3,655,600 | ||
145,000 | Ryder System, Inc. | 13,045,650 | ||
90,000 | Snap-On, Inc. | 10,897,200 | ||
190,000 | * | TAL International Group, Inc. | 7,837,500 | |
110,000 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 3,423,200 | ||
335,000 | Textron, Inc. | 12,056,650 |
129 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Industrials (continued) | ||||
275,000 | Tyco International, Ltd. | $ 12,256,750 | ||
70,000 | * | United Rentals, Inc. | 7,777,000 | |
154,700 | United Technologies Corporation | 16,336,320 | ||
216,353,444 | ||||
Information Technology—20.1% | ||||
2,700 | Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd. (ADR) | 239,895 | ||
350,000 | * | Apple, Inc. | 35,262,500 | |
325,000 | * | ARRIS Group, Inc. | 9,215,375 | |
220,000 | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 19,140,000 | ||
200,000 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 6,480,000 | |
400,000 | CDW Corporation | 12,420,000 | ||
875,000 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 22,023,750 | ||
100,000 | * | eBay, Inc. | 5,663,000 | |
850,000 | EMC Corporation | 24,871,000 | ||
475,000 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 16,848,250 | ||
583,775 | Intel Corporation | 20,327,045 | ||
151,425 | International Business Machines Corporation | 28,745,008 | ||
275,000 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 3,907,750 | ||
500,000 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | 11,075,000 | ||
625,000 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 12,809,375 | ||
375,400 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 13,840,998 | ||
625,000 | Microsoft Corporation | 28,975,000 | ||
235,000 | * | NXP Semiconductors NV | 16,081,050 | |
350,000 | Oracle Corporation | 13,398,000 | ||
150,000 | * | PTC, Inc. | 5,535,000 | |
281,800 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 21,070,186 | ||
455,200 | Symantec Corporation | 10,701,752 | ||
90,000 | * | Synaptics, Inc. | 6,588,000 | |
225,000 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 12,440,250 | ||
75,000 | * | Yahoo!, Inc. | 3,056,250 | |
360,714,434 | ||||
Materials—4.5% | ||||
100,000 | Celanese Corporation – Series “A” | 5,852,000 | ||
220,000 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 10,403,800 | ||
425,000 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 13,876,250 | ||
200,000 | International Paper Company | 9,548,000 | ||
235,000 | LyondellBasell Industries NV – Class “A” | 25,535,100 |
130 |
Shares or | ||||||
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Materials (continued) | ||||||
40,000 | Praxair, Inc. | $ 5,160,000 | ||||
135,000 | RPM International, Inc. | 6,180,300 | ||||
275,000 | * | Trinseo SA | 4,325,750 | |||
80,881,200 | ||||||
Telecommunication Services—2.1% | ||||||
475,000 | AT&T, Inc. | 16,739,000 | ||||
425,000 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 21,245,750 | ||||
37,984,750 | ||||||
Utilities—.7% | ||||||
190,000 | * | Dynegy, Inc. | 5,483,400 | |||
151,100 | NiSource, Inc. | 6,192,078 | ||||
11,675,478 | ||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $1,080,814,681) | 1,786,593,914 | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | ||||||
OBLIGATIONS—.1% | ||||||
$ 2,000M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.04%, 10/31/2014 (cost $1,999,933) | 1,999,933 | ||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $1,082,814,614) | 99.8 | % | 1,788,593,847 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .2 | 2,608,288 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 1,791,202,135 |
| |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ADR | American Depositary Receipts |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
131 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 1,786,593,914 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,786,593,914 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 1,999,933 | — | 1,999,933 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 1,786,593,914 | $ | 1,999,933 | $ | — | $ | 1,788,593,847 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
132 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
GLOBAL FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Global Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 10.00% for Class A shares, 9.18% for Class B shares, 10.24% for Advisor Class shares and 10.48% for Institutional Class shares. The Fund declared a dividend of 4.0 cents per share on Class A shares. The Fund did not declare dividends on Class B, Advisor Class or Institutional Class shares. The Fund declared capital gains distributions of 11.0 cents per share on each class of shares.
Global markets advanced during the period as generally solid economic data, coupled with continued accommodative monetary policy from central banks around the world, lifted the enthusiasm for stocks. Despite liquidity concerns in China and tepid economic growth in Europe, market participants were emboldened by signs of expansionary traction in the U.S. and Japan, the world’s largest and third-largest economies, respectively. During the second quarter of 2014, investors took solace from comments out of the European Central Bank (ECB) and Chinese government suggesting that stimulus measures may be ramped up. Bullish sentiment was aided by robust merger and acquisition activity, which some view as a sign of confidence in the recovery, and by accommodative monetary policy from central banks around the globe. The European Central Bank (ECB) introduced a set of unconventional measures to fight disinflationary forces and rekindle growth in the eurozone. In addition, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) announced a cut in the reserve requirement ratio for major banks in order to stimulate lending and support growth. Towards the end of the period, however, the impact of the Russia/Ukraine conflict was felt all over Europe in the form of lower consumer and business confidence. This ongoing geopolitical conflict, combined with disappointing economic data in the region, worried investors who were hoping for a quicker recovery in Europe. Elsewhere, disappointing growth figures in Japan weighed on markets there, while weakening currencies reversed earlier gains in emerging countries.
Within the MSCI All Country World Index, all ten sectors posted positive returns. Health care (+25.8%), information technology (+23.9%) and utilities (+13.6%) led the index, while the materials (+2.7%), consumer discretionary (+6.0%), and industrials (+8.5%) sectors posted more modest gains. On a regional basis, Developed Middle East (+29.8%) and North America (+18.7%) outperformed, while Emerging Middle East (-7.9%) and Japan (+0.9%) lagged.
The Fund’s relative outperformance, on a gross of fees basis, was primarily due to sector allocation, a result of our bottom-up stock selection process, particularly from our overweight allocation to the strong-performing health care sector. Security selection detracted from relative performance, primarily due to weak selection in financials, telecommunication services, and materials. This was partially offset by positive results from selection in the health care, consumer staples, and consumer discretionary sectors. On a regional basis, positive selection
133 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
and an underweight exposure to the weaker-performing emerging markets aided relative returns, as did an underweight allocation to Pacific Developed ex Japan. Security selection and an overweight to Japan detracted from relative performance during the period.
Top contributors to relative performance during the period included NXP Semiconductors, a Netherlands-based semi-conductor company; Monster Beverage, a U.S.-based maker of nonalcoholic beverages, including energy drinks, sodas, and fruit juices; and HCA Holdings, a U.S.-based owner and operator of hospitals and related health care entities. AstraZeneca, a U.K.-based multinational pharmaceutical company, was among the top contributors to absolute returns during the period.
The largest detractors from relative performance during the period included Rexel, a France-based global distributor of low voltage electrical products; Orix, a Japan-based multi-faceted financial services firm; and our underweight to Apple, a personal electronic device maker. Sberbank of Russia, a leading commercial bank and lending institution in Russia, and Rakuten, a Japanese electronic commerce and internet retailer, were among the largest detractors from absolute returns.
From a regional perspective, we remain underweight emerging market countries, which continue to exhibit volatility within their equity markets and currencies. In certain countries, however, valuations are beginning to become more attractive. In China, the government is proactively addressing some of the country’s structural imbalances. Growth is not likely to accelerate, but should remain steady and help moderate volatility in the market and create investment opportunities. The Fund also maintains an overweight exposure to Japan and moved from a slight underweight to an overweight in North America. At the end of the period, the portfolio’s largest overweight sector allocations were to health care, industrials, and information technology, while we remained underweight utilities, telecommunication services, and consumer staples, relative to the benchmark.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
134 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GLOBAL FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.47% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,030.96 | $ 7.48 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,017.70 | $ 7.44 | |
Class B Shares | 2.28% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,026.43 | $11.58 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,013.64 | $11.51 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.03% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,033.17 | $ 5.25 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.91 | $ 5.22 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 1.02% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,033.06 | $ 5.20 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.96 | $ 5.17 |
*Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the period are net of expenses waived.
**Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses.
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total market value of investments.
135 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GLOBAL FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Global Fund (Class A shares) and the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) All Country World Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 10.00% | 9.18% | 10.24% | 10.48% |
Five Years | 9.19% | 8.41% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 6.79% | 6.15% | 13.75% | 14.01% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 3.66% | 5.18% | 10.24% | 10.48% |
Five Years | 7.90% | 8.12% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 6.16% | 6.15% | 13.75% | 14.01% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Global Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/04 with a theoretical investment in the MSCI All Country World Index (the “Index”). The Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging market country indices. The Index consists of 45 country indices including 24 developed and 21 emerging market country indices. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
136 |
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 3.61%, 7.88% and 6.15%, respectively. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 5.13%, 8.09% and 6.13%, respectively. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 10.19% and 11.20%, respectively. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 10.43% and 11.57%, respectively. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
137 |
Portfolio of Investments
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—98.2% | ||||
United States—56.3% | ||||
121,500 | Activision Blizzard, Inc. | $ 2,525,985 | ||
46,200 | Aetna, Inc. | 3,742,200 | ||
48,440 | * | Alkermes, PLC | 2,076,623 | |
11,840 | * | Alliance Data Systems Corporation | 2,939,517 | |
9,200 | * | Amazon.com, Inc. | 2,966,448 | |
94,825 | American International Group, Inc. | 5,122,447 | ||
13,825 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 1,705,729 | ||
34,115 | Amgen, Inc. | 4,791,793 | ||
25,185 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | 2,554,766 | ||
35,220 | Apple, Inc. | 3,548,415 | ||
151,166 | Applied Materials, Inc. | 3,266,697 | ||
9,000 | Artisan Partners Asset Management, Inc. – Class “A” | 468,450 | ||
25,255 | BlackRock, Inc. | 8,291,722 | ||
213,620 | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 10,933,072 | ||
82,000 | * | CBRE Group, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,438,680 | |
45,710 | Celgene Corporation | 4,332,394 | ||
79,555 | Citigroup, Inc. | 4,122,540 | ||
32,660 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 2,003,364 | ||
52,990 | Edison International | 2,963,201 | ||
72,780 | Eli Lilly & Company | 4,719,783 | ||
65,300 | Equifax, Inc. | 4,880,522 | ||
41,600 | Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,108,352 | ||
157,600 | Ford Motor Company | 2,330,904 | ||
59,300 | General Motors Company | 1,894,042 | ||
4,410 | * | Google, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,594,888 | |
12,806 | * | Google, Inc. – Class “C” | 7,393,672 | |
16,950 | Halliburton Company | 1,093,445 | ||
48,330 | * | HCA, Inc. | 3,408,232 | |
137,530 | * | Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 3,387,364 | |
112,970 | Intel Corporation | 3,933,615 | ||
67,310 | International Paper Company | 3,213,379 | ||
58,800 | L Brands, Inc. | 3,938,424 | ||
52,300 | Lincoln National Corporation | 2,802,234 | ||
113,100 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 4,251,429 | ||
15,635 | McKesson Corporation | 3,043,665 | ||
89,590 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 5,310,895 | ||
219,020 | Microsoft Corporation | 10,153,767 | ||
148,470 | Mondelez International, Inc. – Class “A” | 5,087,325 | ||
61,330 | * | Monster Beverage Corporation | 5,622,121 | |
94,949 | Nielsen Holdings NV | 4,209,089 | ||
38,870 | Norfolk Southern Corporation | 4,337,892 |
138 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
United States (continued) | ||||
66,960 | * | NPS Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | $ 1,740,960 | |
44,500 | Phillips 66 | 3,618,295 | ||
11,230 | Pioneer Natural Resources Company | 2,211,973 | ||
3,431 | * | Priceline.com, Inc. | 3,975,088 | |
41,200 | Raytheon Company | 4,186,744 | ||
12,600 | * | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 4,542,552 | |
59,540 | Robert Half International, Inc. | 2,917,460 | ||
65,550 | * | Salesforce.com, Inc. | 3,771,092 | |
11,610 | * | Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. | 1,813,946 | |
29,200 | Solera Holdings, Inc. | 1,645,712 | ||
37,945 | * | Teledyne Technologies, Inc. | 3,567,209 | |
54,800 | * | United Continental Holdings, Inc. | 2,564,092 | |
30,300 | * | Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 3,402,993 | |
52,810 | VF Corporation | 3,487,044 | ||
12,270 | Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. | 2,131,299 | ||
91,900 | Vulcan Materials Company | 5,535,137 | ||
35,465 | * | WABCO Holdings, Inc. | 3,225,542 | |
56,320 | Western Digital Corporation | 5,481,062 | ||
149,000 | * | WisdomTree Investments, Inc. | 1,695,620 | |
148,304 | Zoetis, Inc. | 5,479,833 | ||
228,502,735 | ||||
Japan—11.3% | ||||
52,000 | Asahi Group Holdings, Ltd. | 1,504,134 | ||
77,930 | Bridgestone Corporation | 2,573,157 | ||
137,000 | Daiwa House Industry Company, Ltd. | 2,457,245 | ||
213,000 | Hitachi, Ltd. | 1,626,214 | ||
313,000 | Isuzu Motors, Ltd. | 4,422,718 | ||
53,000 | Japan Exchange Group, Inc. | 1,257,660 | ||
83,200 | M3, Inc. | 1,334,901 | ||
584,090 | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 3,302,362 | ||
164,240 | Mitsui Fudosan Company, Ltd. | 5,029,986 | ||
91,700 | * | Olympus Corporation | 3,289,480 | |
299,100 | ORIX Corporation | 4,125,423 | ||
234,800 | Rakuten, Inc. | 2,703,427 | ||
124,230 | Seven & I Holdings Company, Ltd. | 4,817,671 | ||
49,600 | SoftBank Corporation | 3,476,680 | ||
33,400 | Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. | 1,451,764 | ||
523,250 | Toshiba Corporation | 2,424,136 | ||
45,796,958 |
139 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
United Kingdom—5.1% | ||||
125,088 | AstraZeneca, PLC | $ 9,006,701 | ||
202,664 | BG Group, PLC | 3,745,432 | ||
103,675 | easyJet, PLC | 2,391,660 | ||
588,884 | Glencore, PLC | 3,276,404 | ||
94,425 | * | Markit, Ltd. | 2,204,824 | |
20,625,021 | ||||
France—3.9% | ||||
61,903 | Air Liquide SA | 7,551,664 | ||
142,997 | Rexel SA | 2,668,967 | ||
54,594 | Schneider Electric SA | 4,193,119 | ||
28,565 | Societe Generale | 1,458,543 | ||
15,872,293 | ||||
Netherlands—3.5% | ||||
535,886 | * | ING Groep NV – CVA | 7,656,385 | |
855,910 | * | Koninklijke (Royal) KPN NV | 2,743,073 | |
55,511 | * | NXP Semiconductors NV | 3,798,618 | |
14,198,076 | ||||
Canada—3.1% | ||||
82,555 | Imperial Oil, Ltd. | 3,907,059 | ||
45,590 | Tim Hortons, Inc. | 3,599,307 | ||
100,530 | TransCanada Corporation | 5,191,344 | ||
12,697,710 | ||||
Italy—2.3% | ||||
274,258 | Assicurazioni Generali SpA | 5,771,956 | ||
65,850 | Banca Generali SpA | 1,741,060 | ||
359,165 | * | FinecoBank Banca Fineco SpA | 1,922,842 | |
9,435,858 | ||||
Belgium—2.1% | ||||
77,486 | Anheuser-Busch InBev NV | 8,625,543 |
140 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
China—1.9% | ||||
40,150 | * | Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd. (ADR) | $ 3,567,328 | |
11,040 | * | Baidu.com, Inc. (ADR) | 2,409,259 | |
1,408,000 | PetroChina Company, Ltd. | 1,804,175 | ||
7,780,762 | ||||
Spain—1.1% | ||||
420,964 | CaixaBank SA | 2,563,721 | ||
350,227 | * | International Consolidated Airlines Group SA | 2,084,272 | |
4,647,993 | ||||
Germany—1.1% | ||||
35,160 | Brenntag AG | 1,728,219 | ||
87,334 | Deutsche Post AG | 2,801,140 | ||
4,529,359 | ||||
Sweden—1.1% | ||||
82,338 | Assa Abloy AB – Class “B” | 4,256,026 | ||
India—1.1% | ||||
179,585 | ICICI Bank, Ltd. | 4,168,460 | ||
5,251 | Reliance Industries, Ltd. | 80,406 | ||
4,248,866 | ||||
Switzerland—1.0% | ||||
89,990 | Julius Baer Group, Ltd. | 4,035,658 | ||
South Korea—.9% | ||||
82,926 | * | SK Hynix, Inc. | 3,673,812 | |
Greece—.8% | ||||
3,958,727 | * | Alpha Bank AE | 3,070,525 | |
Ireland—.6% | ||||
113,827 | CRH, PLC | 2,601,865 | ||
Hong Kong—.3% | ||||
63,700 | Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing, Ltd. | 1,370,783 |
141 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares or | |||||
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
Brazil—.3% | |||||
2,200 | BB Seguridade Participacoes SA | $ 29,000 | |||
82,780 | Petroleo Brasileiro SA – Petrobras (ADR) | 1,174,648 | |||
1,203,648 | |||||
Colombia—.3% | |||||
83,200 | Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores SA (ADR) | 1,127,360 | |||
Norway—.1% | |||||
33,919 | * | Tanker Investments, Ltd. | 337,989 | ||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $372,738,742) | 398,638,840 | ||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.7% | |||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||
$3,000M | 0.015%, 11/21/2014 | 2,999,936 | |||
4,000M | 0.02%, 11/21/2014 | 3,999,887 | |||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $6,999,823) | 6,999,823 | ||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $379,738,565) | 99.9 | % | 405,638,663 | ||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .1 | 392,300 | |||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 406,030,963 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: |
ADR American Depositary Receipts |
142 |
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 228,502,735 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 228,502,735 | ||||
Japan | 45,796,958 | — | — | 45,796,958 | ||||||||
United Kingdom | 20,625,021 | — | — | 20,625,021 | ||||||||
France | 15,872,293 | — | — | 15,872,293 | ||||||||
Netherlands | 14,198,076 | — | — | 14,198,076 | ||||||||
Canada | 12,697,710 | — | — | 12,697,710 | ||||||||
Italy | 9,435,858 | — | — | 9,435,858 | ||||||||
Belgium | 8,625,543 | — | — | 8,625,543 | ||||||||
China | 7,780,762 | — | — | 7,780,762 | ||||||||
Spain | 4,647,993 | — | — | 4,647,993 | ||||||||
Germany | 4,529,359 | — | — | 4,529,359 | ||||||||
Sweden | 4,256,026 | — | — | 4,256,026 | ||||||||
India | 4,248,866 | — | — | 4,248,866 | ||||||||
Switzerland | 4,035,658 | — | — | 4,035,658 | ||||||||
South Korea | 3,673,812 | — | — | 3,673,812 | ||||||||
Greece | 3,070,525 | — | — | 3,070,525 | ||||||||
Ireland | 2,601,865 | — | — | 2,601,865 | ||||||||
Hong Kong | 1,370,783 | — | — | 1,370,783 |
143 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2014
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks (continued) | ||||||||||||
Brazil | $ | 1,203,648 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,203,648 | ||||
Colombia | 1,127,360 | — | — | 1,127,360 | ||||||||
Norway | 337,989 | — | — | 337,989 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 6,999,823 | — | 6,999,823 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 398,638,840 | $ | 6,999,823 | $ | — | $ | 405,638,663 |
During the year ended September 30, 2014, there were no transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments that had a material impact to the Fund. This does not include transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments due to the Fund utilizing international fair value pricing during the period (see Note 1A). Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
144 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
SELECT GROWTH FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Select Growth Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 18.77% for Class A shares, 17.75% for Class B shares, 18.90% for Advisor Class shares and 19.31% for Institutional Class shares. The Fund declared a dividend of 0.4 cents per share on Class A shares. The Fund did not declare dividends on Class B shares, Advisor Class shares or Institutional Class shares. The Fund’s good performance for the period was helped by attention to reasonable valuation levels, as stocks with deep value characteristics such as low price-to-book and low price-to-earnings ratios were the leaders in the overall market. In addition, the Fund’s focus on companies exhibiting good earnings quality characteristics was somewhat beneficial, but several growth characteristics did not help as the strong market did not differentiate much between fast and slow growth.
The market started this fiscal year with very strong performance at the end of 2013, but saw a pullback that moderated returns in the first quarter of calendar 2014. This was followed by another quarter of solid returns, then another pullback that moderated returns in the fiscal year’s final quarter. Pullbacks in midterm election years are quite common. According to Strategas Research Partners, the average S&P 500 intra-year decline peak-to-trough in such a year is 19%. But the average return 12 months after that intra-year low is 32%. This year did not see a pullback with a magnitude of an average year, but with the uncertainty of the election dissipating we believe conditions are in place for positive returns ahead. The U.S. economy is on a slow but improving trend, with earnings growth expected in the high single-digits range. With a favorable environment for corporate earnings coupled with valuation levels that are quite reasonable relative to history, we believe the companies owned in the Fund should deliver solid results going forward.
The Fund’s strong performance for the fiscal year was helped by the Information Technology and Industrials sectors. In the Information Technology sector, strong performance from Hewlett Packard as the turnaround started to bear fruit caused the shares to rise 72%, while increased demand for data storage helped shares of SanDisk and Western Digital gain 66% and 35%, respectively. In Industrials, Alaska Air Group continued to deliver solid earnings which helped the stock gain 41% for the period, while shares of railcar component manufacturer Wabtec gained 29% as demand for railcars remain strong.
On the negative side, the Consumer Discretionary sector proved challenging for the Fund during the period. Whirlpool declined over 4% before the position was sold as continued solid domestic demand for appliances failed to offset weakness outside
145 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
the U.S., while Starbucks declined almost 1% during the year as higher coffee prices negatively affected margins.
We are pleased to have generated a solid return, both in absolute terms and relative to the benchmark, during the fiscal year. We also believe that equities should be able to generate solid returns going forward as continued slow and steady economic growth should provide a solid foundation for strong business performance of the companies in the Fund. We continue to believe our focus on high quality companies where earnings will exceed market expectations is the key to generating excess returns over the long term.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
146 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.26% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,031.02 | $ 6.42 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.75 | $ 6.38 | |
Class B Shares | 2.04% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,027.20 | $10.37 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.84 | $10.30 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.82% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,032.84 | $ 4.18 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.96 | $ 4.15 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.82% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,033.65 | $ 4.18 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.96 | $ 4.15 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total market value of investments.
147 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Select Growth Fund (Class A shares) and the Russell 3000 Growth Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 18.77% | 17.75% | 18.90% | 19.31% |
Five Years | 15.54% | 14.73% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 5.92% | 5.35% | 19.22% | 19.58% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 11.98% | 13.75% | 18.90% | 19.31% |
Five Years | 14.16% | 14.50% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 5.29% | 5.35% | 19.22% | 19.58% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Select Growth Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/04 with a theoretical investment in the Russell 3000 Growth Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values (the Russell 3000 Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization). It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
148 |
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Advisor Class and Institutional Class were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Advisor Class the “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 16.67%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 17.15%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Frank Russell and Company and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
149 |
Portfolio of Investments
SELECT GROWTH FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—98.3% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—18.7% | ||||
147,700 | BorgWarner, Inc. | $ 7,770,497 | ||
297,400 | Gentex Corporation | 7,961,398 | ||
133,800 | Home Depot, Inc. | 12,274,812 | ||
10,800 | * | Priceline.com, Inc. | 12,512,664 | |
127,200 | Starbucks Corporation | 9,598,512 | ||
161,000 | TJX Companies, Inc. | 9,526,370 | ||
119,000 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 9,669,940 | ||
69,314,193 | ||||
Consumer Staples—5.6% | ||||
69,800 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 7,508,386 | ||
252,700 | Kroger Company | 13,140,400 | ||
20,648,786 | ||||
Energy—6.3% | ||||
43,000 | Chevron Corporation | 5,130,760 | ||
46,400 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 4,363,920 | ||
70,600 | Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 6,909,622 | ||
147,000 | Valero Energy Corporation | 6,801,690 | ||
23,205,992 | ||||
Financials—8.6% | ||||
148,600 | American Express Company | 13,008,444 | ||
112,800 | Comerica, Inc. | 5,624,208 | ||
125,200 | Discover Financial Services | 8,061,628 | ||
53,800 | Travelers Companies, Inc. | 5,053,972 | ||
31,748,252 | ||||
Health Care—18.5% | ||||
65,800 | * | Actavis, PLC | 15,876,224 | |
148,600 | * | Align Technology, Inc. | 7,679,648 | |
44,900 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | 6,407,679 | ||
106,900 | * | Covance, Inc. | 8,413,030 | |
102,200 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 10,879,190 | |
55,900 | Johnson & Johnson | 5,958,381 | ||
68,600 | McKesson Corporation | 13,354,362 | ||
68,568,514 |
150 |
Shares or | |||||
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
Industrials—17.1% | |||||
209,900 | Alaska Air Group, Inc. | $ 9,139,046 | |||
197,000 | AMETEK, Inc. | 9,891,370 | |||
87,400 | Boeing Company | 11,133,012 | |||
91,700 | Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 10,075,996 | |||
94,900 | Union Pacific Corporation | 10,289,058 | |||
159,300 | Wabtec Corporation | 12,909,672 | |||
63,438,154 | |||||
Information Technology—23.5% | |||||
53,200 | * | Alliance Data Systems Corporation | 13,207,964 | ||
142,300 | Amdocs, Ltd. | 6,528,724 | |||
84,700 | * | ANSYS, Inc. | 6,409,249 | ||
191,200 | Apple, Inc. | 19,263,400 | |||
359,000 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 9,036,030 | |||
93,700 | DST Systems, Inc. | 7,863,304 | |||
104,700 | * | Facebook, Inc. – Class “A” | 8,275,488 | ||
235,200 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 8,342,544 | |||
83,100 | SanDisk Corporation | 8,139,645 | |||
87,066,348 | |||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $248,894,358) | 363,990,239 | ||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.3% | |||||
$5,000M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.015%, 11/21/2014 (cost $4,999,894) | 4,999,894 | |||
Total Value of Investments (cost $253,894,252) | 99.6 | % | 368,990,133 | ||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .4 | 1,432,089 | |||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 370,422,222 |
* | Non-income producing |
151 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
September 30, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has |
the ability to access. | |
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | |
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | |
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | |
similar data. | |
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | |
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | |
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 363,990,239 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 363,990,239 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 4,999,894 | — | 4,999,894 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 363,990,239 | $ | 4,999,894 | $ | — | $ | 368,990,133 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
152 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Opportunity Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 14.20% for Class A shares, 13.32% for Class B shares, 14.43% for Advisor Class shares and 14.66% for Institutional Class shares. The Fund declared dividends of 16.1 cents per share on Class A shares and 17.1 cents per share on Institutional Class shares. The Fund did not declare dividends on Class B shares or Advisor Class shares. The Fund declared capital gains distributions of $2.43 per share on each class of shares.
The Fund performed well, posting strong results while also exceeding its benchmark index by a comfortable margin. The Fund’s absolute performance was mainly attributable to investments in health care and industrials stocks. Among our health care stocks, Actavis PLC — a global specialty and generic pharmaceutical maker — benefitted from anticipated tax and operating costs savings from its acquisition of Forest Laboratories Inc., itself a global specialty pharmaceutical maker. Salix Pharmaceuticals Ltd — a specialty pharmaceutical maker with a focus on gastrointestinal drugs —has benefitted from strong operating results, but has primarily risen on reported news of possible offers to be acquired.
Among the Fund’s industrial stocks, United Rentals, Inc. — a construction and industrial equipment rental company — benefited from stronger-than-expected rental demand driven by a rebound in non-residential construction spending. Ryder System, Inc. — a truck lease and commercial rental company — benefitted from increased industry regulatory burdens and an improved macro environment, which caused private fleet operators to favor outsourcing.
On a relative basis, the Fund outperformed the S&P MidCap 400 Index primarily due to stock selection in the health care and industrial sectors. In the health care sector, Actavis PLC and Salix Pharmaceuticals Ltd both performed well for the reasons discussed above. In the industrials sector, United Rentals, Inc. and Ryder System, Inc. also both performed well for the reasons discussed above.
The Fund’s stock selection within the consumer staples sector hurt relative performance. Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. — a direct seller of personal care products and nutritional supplements — had to temporarily suspend recruitment of new distributors in China after the government became concerned about recruiting and selling practices. While the matter has been resolved, the company’s earnings growth was interrupted and its shares suffered as a result.
153 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
154 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.19% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,026.59 | $6.05 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.10 | $6.02 | |
Class B Shares | 1.97% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,022.80 | $9.99 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.19 | $9.95 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.85% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,028.48 | $4.32 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.81 | $4.31 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.78% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,028.75 | $3.97 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.16 | $3.95 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total market value of investments.
155 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Opportunity Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 14.20% | 13.32% | 14.43% | 14.66% |
Five Years | 17.76% | 16.92% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 9.79% | 9.14% | 20.27% | 20.50% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 7.63% | 9.32% | 14.43% | 14.66% |
Five Years | 16.37% | 16.71% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 9.14% | 9.14% | 20.27% | 20.50% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Opportunity Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/04 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 400 stocks designed to measure performance of the mid-range sector of the U.S. stock market. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
156 |
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for Ten Years would have been 9.13%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Ten Years would have been 9.13%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 17.79%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 18.15%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
157 |
Portfolio of Investments
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—98.1% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—18.7% | ||||
436,000 | * | Belmond, Ltd. – Class “A” | $ 5,083,760 | |
150,000 | BorgWarner, Inc. | 7,891,500 | ||
6,000 | * | Container Store Group, Inc. | 130,620 | |
240,000 | CST Brands, Inc. | 8,628,000 | ||
235,000 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 14,414,900 | ||
1,000 | * | El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. | 35,910 | |
300,000 | Extended Stay America, Inc. | 7,122,000 | ||
60,200 | GNC Holdings, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,332,148 | ||
100,000 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 9,804,000 | ||
170,400 | * | Jarden Corporation | 10,242,744 | |
165,000 | L Brands, Inc. | 11,051,700 | ||
115,000 | Lear Corporation | 9,937,150 | ||
185,000 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 6,365,850 | ||
50,000 | Nordstrom, Inc. | 3,418,500 | ||
150,000 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 6,088,500 | ||
5,600 | * | Performance Sports Group, Ltd. | 89,992 | |
99,900 | Pier 1 Imports, Inc. | 1,187,811 | ||
25,000 | Ralph Lauren Corporation | 4,118,250 | ||
410,000 | Ruth’s Hospitality Group, Inc. | 4,526,400 | ||
280,000 | * | ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. | 6,776,000 | |
1,000 | * | Travelport Worldwide, Ltd. | 16,460 | |
135,000 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 13,668,750 | |
120,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 8,284,800 | ||
4,000 | * | Vince Holding Corporation | 121,040 | |
300,000 | * | William Lyon Homes – Class “A” | 6,630,000 | |
335,000 | * | Winnebago Industries, Inc. | 7,292,950 | |
63,200 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 5,135,632 | ||
160,395,367 | ||||
Consumer Staples—2.8% | ||||
150,000 | Avon Products, Inc. | 1,890,000 | ||
80,000 | Herbalife, Ltd. | 3,500,000 | ||
20,000 | McCormick & Company, Inc. | 1,338,000 | ||
213,800 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 9,627,414 | ||
165,000 | Pinnacle Foods, Inc. | 5,387,250 | ||
8,200 | * | Smart & Final Stores, Inc. | 118,326 | |
71,489 | Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 2,000,977 | ||
23,861,967 |
158 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Energy—7.4% | ||||
30,000 | * | Dril-Quip, Inc. | $ 2,682,000 | |
82,500 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 3,408,075 | ||
80,000 | EOG Resources, Inc. | 7,921,600 | ||
90,000 | EQT Corporation | 8,238,600 | ||
325,000 | * | Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. | 7,169,500 | |
85,000 | Hess Corporation | 8,017,200 | ||
139,700 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 10,631,170 | ||
43,800 | Noble Corporation, PLC | 973,236 | ||
1,000 | * | Parsley Energy, Inc. – Class “A” | 21,330 | |
325,000 | * | RSP Permian, Inc. | 8,307,000 | |
375,000 | Talisman Energy, Inc. | 3,243,750 | ||
125,000 | * | Weatherford International, PLC | 2,600,000 | |
63,213,461 | ||||
Financials—11.6% | ||||
60,000 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 7,402,800 | ||
220,000 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 5,167,800 | ||
308,600 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 6,869,436 | ||
19,300 | * | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 452,006 | |
105,000 | City National Corporation | 7,945,350 | ||
206,100 | Discover Financial Services | 13,270,779 | ||
150,000 | Douglas Emmett, Inc. (REIT) | 3,850,500 | ||
45,000 | Federal Realty Investment Trust (REIT) | 5,330,700 | ||
90,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 2,085,300 | ||
100 | First Republic Bank | 4,938 | ||
171,000 | * | Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. – Class “A” | 1,845,090 | |
15,000 | Invesco, Ltd. | 592,200 | ||
120,000 | NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. | 5,090,400 | ||
100,000 | Oritani Financial Corporation | 1,409,000 | ||
252,200 | Protective Life Corporation | 17,505,202 | ||
150,000 | * | Realogy Holdings Corporation | 5,580,000 | |
92,000 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 3,483,120 | ||
210,600 | Sterling Bancorp | 2,693,574 | ||
175,000 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 9,045,750 | ||
99,623,945 | ||||
Health Care—18.2% | ||||
140,000 | * | Actavis, PLC | 33,779,200 | |
114,000 | * | Centene Corporation | 9,428,940 | |
75,000 | DENTSPLY International, Inc. | 3,420,000 | ||
185,000 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 19,693,250 |
159 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | |
Health Care (continued) | |||
221,000 | * | Lannett Company, Inc. | $ 10,095,280 |
80,000 | McKesson Corporation | 15,573,600 | |
135,000 | Omnicare, Inc. | 8,405,100 | |
55,000 | Perrigo Company, PLC | 8,260,450 | |
186,600 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 4,181,706 | |
424,600 | * | Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. | 13,744,302 |
90,000 | * | Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. | 14,061,600 |
2,700 | * | Surgical Care Affiliates, Inc. | 72,171 |
125,000 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 15,212,500 | |
155,928,099 | |||
Industrials—15.8% | |||
160,000 | A.O. Smith Corporation | 7,564,800 | |
280,000 | ADT Corporation | 9,928,800 | |
256,500 | * | Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. | 5,373,675 |
191,000 | Altra Industrial Motion Corporation | 5,569,560 | |
65,000 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 3,640,000 |
60,000 | Dover Corporation | 4,819,800 | |
120,000 | G&K Services, Inc. – Class “A” | 6,645,600 | |
175,000 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 7,094,500 |
140,000 | Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 10,273,200 | |
60,000 | IDEX Corporation | 4,342,200 | |
210,000 | ITT Corporation | 9,437,400 | |
82,500 | J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | 6,109,125 | |
40,000 | Roper Industries, Inc. | 5,851,600 | |
130,000 | Ryder System, Inc. | 11,696,100 | |
75,000 | Snap-On, Inc. | 9,081,000 | |
90,000 | * | TAL International Group, Inc. | 3,712,500 |
60,000 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 1,867,200 | |
129,700 | Textron, Inc. | 4,667,903 | |
155,000 | * | United Rentals, Inc. | 17,220,500 |
134,895,463 | |||
Information Technology—14.4% | |||
240,000 | * | ARRIS Group, Inc. | 6,805,200 |
150,000 | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 13,050,000 | |
250,000 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 8,100,000 |
300,000 | CDW Corporation | 9,315,000 | |
90,000 | * | Fiserv, Inc. | 5,817,150 |
240,000 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 3,410,400 |
160 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Information Technology (continued) | ||||
300,000 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | $ 6,645,000 | ||
400,000 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 8,198,000 | ||
310,300 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 11,440,761 | ||
150,000 | Microchip Technology, Inc. | 7,084,500 | ||
600,000 | * | ON Semiconductor Corporation | 5,364,000 | |
325,000 | Symantec Corporation | 7,640,750 | ||
75,000 | * | Synaptics, Inc. | 5,490,000 | |
75,000 | * | SYNNEX Corporation | 4,847,250 | |
160,000 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 8,846,400 | ||
275,000 | Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 10,975,250 | ||
123,029,661 | ||||
Materials—5.1% | ||||
120,000 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 5,674,800 | ||
267,322 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 8,728,063 | ||
120,000 | International Paper Company | 5,728,800 | ||
40,000 | Praxair, Inc. | 5,160,000 | ||
55,000 | Sigma-Aldrich Corporation | 7,480,550 | ||
290,000 | * | Trinseo SA | 4,561,700 | |
70,000 | Westlake Chemical Corporation | 6,061,300 | ||
43,395,213 | ||||
Telecommunication Services—.2% | ||||
183,500 | NTELOS Holdings Corporation | 1,952,440 | ||
Utilities—3.9% | ||||
111,000 | AGL Resources, Inc. | 5,698,740 | ||
110,000 | * | Dynegy, Inc. | 3,174,600 | |
120,800 | NiSource, Inc. | 4,950,384 | ||
144,800 | Portland General Electric Company | 4,650,976 | ||
135,000 | SCANA Corporation | 6,697,350 | ||
200,000 | Wisconsin Energy Corporation | 8,600,000 | ||
33,772,050 | ||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $522,296,184) | 840,067,666 |
161 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2014
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.6% | |||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||
$ 4,000M | 0.003%, 10/29/2014 | $ 3,999,991 | |||
10,000M | 0.025%, 11/21/2014 | 9,999,646 | |||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $13,999,637) | 13,999,637 | ||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $536,295,821) | 99.7 | % | 854,067,303 | ||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .3 | 2,761,911 | |||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 856,829,214 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
162 |
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 840,067,666 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 840,067,666 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 13,999,637 | — | 13,999,637 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 840,067,666 | $ | 13,999,637 | $ | — | $ | 854,067,303 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 163 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Special Situations Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 11.65% for Class A shares, 10.71% for Class B shares, 11.82% for Advisor Class shares and 12.10% for Institutional Class shares, including capital gains distributions of $4.60 per share on each class of shares.
The Fund performed well, posting strong results while also exceeding its benchmark index by a comfortable margin. The Fund’s absolute performance was mainly attributable to investments in industrial, information technology and financial stocks. Among industrial stocks held by the Fund, United Rentals, Inc. (a construction and industrial equipment rental company) benefitted from stronger-than-expected rental demand and margin expansion, driven by a rebound in non-residential construction. In addition, Ryder System, Inc. (a truck lease and commercial rental company) has been a primary beneficiary of increased industry regulatory burdens and an improved macro environment, which has caused private fleet operators to favor outsourcing. Among information technology stocks, TriQuint Semiconductor — which makes components for the consumer smartphone market — benefitted from its announcement that it would merge with RF Micro Devices and (subsequently) realize significant expense synergies. Additionally, Intersil Corporation (a diversified semiconductor supplier) benefited from strong execution under its new management team as well as takeover speculation given recent consolidation taking place within the semiconductor industry. Among financial stocks held by the Fund, Protective Life Corporation (an insurance company) agreed to be acquired by Dai-Ichi Life Insurance Company for a hefty premium.
On a relative basis, the Fund outperformed the Russell 2000 Index primarily due to stocks in the industrials and information technology sectors. Among industrials, United Rentals, Inc. — which is discussed above — was the primary driver of outperformance. In information technology, TriQuint — also discussed above — was the primary driver of outperformance. While neither an industrials nor information technology stock, Westlake Chemicals — a materials sector stock and a maker of vinyls, ethylene and other polymers — was notable as the Fund’s top contributor on both a relative and absolute basis. The company benefitted by creating a Master Limited Partnership for its ethylene assets on better terms than anticipated.
164 |
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
165 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.32% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,001.51 | $ 6.62 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.45 | $ 6.68 | |
Class B Shares | 2.13% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $997.65 | $10.67 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.39 | $10.76 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.95% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,003.76 | $ 4.77 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.31 | $ 4.81 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.88% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,003.74 | $ 4.42 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.66 | $ 4.46 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total market value of investments.
166 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Special Situations Fund (Class A shares) and the Russell 2000 Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 11.65% | 10.71% | 11.82% | 12.10% |
Five Years | 13.98% | 13.17% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 9.54% | 8.91% | 14.30% | 14.62% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 5.24% | 7.07% | 11.82% | 12.10% |
Five Years | 12.65% | 12.92% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 8.89% | 8.91% | 14.30% | 14.62% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Special Situations Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/04 with a theoretical investment in the Russell 2000 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged Index that measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Index consists of the smallest 2,000 companies in the Russell 3000 Index (which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market). It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
167 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 5.19%, 12.57% and 8.80%, respectively. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 7.02%, 12.84% and 8.81%, respectively. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 11.77% and 11.71% respectively. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 12.04% and 12.08% respectively. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Frank Russell and Company and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
168 |
Portfolio of Investments
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—96.8% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—16.4% | ||||
196,300 | * | Belmond, Ltd. – Class “A” | $ 2,288,858 | |
2,700 | * | Container Store Group, Inc. | 58,779 | |
214,750 | CST Brands, Inc. | 7,720,262 | ||
192,800 | Extended Stay America, Inc. | 4,577,071 | ||
258,125 | * | Fox Factory Holding Corporation | 4,000,937 | |
41,125 | Hanesbrands, Inc. | 4,418,470 | ||
40,000 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 3,921,600 | ||
99,125 | * | Jarden Corporation | 5,958,404 | |
126,775 | * | Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. | 3,045,135 | |
91,700 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 3,722,103 | ||
39,600 | * | Performance Sports Group, Ltd. | 636,372 | |
67,000 | Pier 1 Imports, Inc. | 796,630 | ||
204,325 | Regal Entertainment Group – Class “A” | 4,061,981 | ||
271,000 | Ruth’s Hospitality Group, Inc. | 2,991,840 | ||
195,000 | * | ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. | 4,719,000 | |
97,175 | * | Starz – Class “A” | 3,214,549 | |
65,725 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 4,537,654 | ||
76,200 | * | Visteon Corporation | 7,410,450 | |
169,850 | * | William Lyon Homes – Class “A” | 3,753,685 | |
187,800 | * | Winnebago Industries, Inc. | 4,088,406 | |
75,922,186 | ||||
Consumer Staples—1.2% | ||||
117,400 | * | Inventure Foods, Inc. | 1,521,504 | |
15,900 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 715,977 | ||
104,450 | Pinnacle Foods, Inc. | 3,410,293 | ||
4,600 | * | Smart & Final Stores, Inc. | 66,378 | |
5,714,152 | ||||
Energy—8.4% | ||||
33,900 | * | Dril-Quip, Inc. | 3,030,660 | |
182,750 | * | Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. | 4,031,465 | |
98,000 | * | Kodiak Oil & Gas Corporation | 1,329,860 | |
213,966 | * | Matrix Service Company | 5,160,860 | |
158,500 | * | RSP Permian, Inc. | 4,051,260 | |
194,375 | * | Stone Energy Corporation | 6,095,600 | |
198,075 | Western Refining, Inc. | 8,317,169 | ||
89,000 | * | Whiting Petroleum Corporation | 6,901,950 | |
38,918,824 |
169 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Financials—18.2% | ||||
138,175 | American Financial Group, Inc. | $ 7,998,951 | ||
84,700 | Aspen Insurance Holdings, Ltd. | 3,622,619 | ||
164,425 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 3,862,343 | ||
194,175 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 4,322,335 | ||
101,300 | Brown & Brown, Inc. | 3,256,795 | ||
61,100 | City National Corporation | 4,623,437 | ||
153,700 | Douglas Emmett, Inc. (REIT) | 3,945,479 | ||
40,525 | Federal Realty Investment Trust (REIT) | 4,800,591 | ||
104,700 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 2,425,899 | ||
2,124 | FNF Group | 58,920 | ||
55,800 | * | Green Bancorp, Inc. | 956,970 | |
177,575 | Montpelier Re Holdings, Ltd. | 5,520,807 | ||
154,525 | OceanFirst Financial Corporation | 2,458,493 | ||
133,650 | Oritani Financial Corporation | 1,883,129 | ||
50,400 | Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. | 2,881,368 | ||
145,975 | Protective Life Corporation | 10,132,125 | ||
100,425 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 3,802,091 | ||
397,150 | Sterling Bancorp | 5,079,549 | ||
278,325 | * | Strategic Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (REIT) | 3,242,486 | |
184,300 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 2,547,026 | ||
233,675 | TCF Financial Corporation | 3,628,973 | ||
56,150 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,902,394 | ||
83,952,780 | ||||
Health Care—10.8% | ||||
122,700 | * | ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 3,469,956 | |
121,150 | * | Centene Corporation | 10,020,316 | |
133,650 | * | Exactech, Inc. | 3,059,249 | |
96,775 | Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 6,184,890 | ||
161,000 | * | Horizon Pharma, PLC | 1,977,080 | |
46,000 | * | ICON, PLC | 2,632,580 | |
133,200 | * | Lannett Company, Inc. | 6,084,576 | |
100,850 | Omnicare, Inc. | 6,278,921 | ||
85,400 | PerkinElmer, Inc. | 3,723,440 | ||
135,400 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 3,034,314 | ||
21,500 | * | Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. | 3,359,160 | |
1,600 | * | Surgical Care Affiliates, Inc. | 42,768 | |
49,867,250 |
170 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Industrials—17.1% | ||||
98,200 | A.O. Smith Corporation | $ 4,642,896 | ||
118,500 | * | Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. | 2,482,575 | |
106,000 | Altra Industrial Motion Corporation | 3,090,960 | ||
44,400 | Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. | 2,026,860 | ||
93,525 | G&K Services, Inc. – Class “A” | 5,179,414 | ||
101,500 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 4,114,810 | |
51,800 | Greenbrier Companies, Inc. | 3,801,084 | ||
139,825 | Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 7,431,699 | ||
137,675 | ITT Corporation | 6,187,114 | ||
168,350 | Kforce, Inc. | 3,294,609 | ||
323,200 | * | NCI Building Systems, Inc. | 6,270,080 | |
48,200 | * | Patrick Industries, Inc. | 2,041,752 | |
10,450 | Precision Castparts Corporation | 2,475,396 | ||
122,075 | Ryder System, Inc. | 10,983,088 | ||
45,950 | Snap-On, Inc. | 5,563,626 | ||
86,875 | * | United Rentals, Inc. | 9,651,813 | |
79,237,776 | ||||
Information Technology—16.9% | ||||
157,225 | * | Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | 2,954,258 | |
142,300 | * | ARRIS Group, Inc. | 4,034,916 | |
168,300 | Avnet, Inc. | 6,984,450 | ||
153,700 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 4,979,880 | |
243,300 | CDW Corporation | 7,554,465 | ||
198,675 | * | CommScope Holding Company, Inc. | 4,750,319 | |
259,600 | * | Entegris, Inc. | 2,985,400 | |
27,625 | IAC/InterActiveCorp | 1,820,487 | ||
151,700 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 2,155,657 | ||
110,000 | * | JDS Uniphase Corporation | 1,408,000 | |
234,375 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 4,803,516 | ||
218,900 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 8,070,843 | ||
47,525 | Microchip Technology, Inc. | 2,244,606 | ||
121,650 | * | Microsemi Corporation | 3,091,127 | |
454,825 | * | ON Semiconductor Corporation | 4,066,136 | |
194,200 | * | Orbotech, Ltd. | 3,025,636 | |
61,000 | * | OSI Systems, Inc. | 3,872,280 | |
41,500 | * | Synaptics, Inc. | 3,037,800 | |
42,700 | * | SYNNEX Corporation | 2,759,701 | |
61,100 | * | Verint Systems, Inc. | 3,397,771 | |
77,997,248 |
171 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares or | |||||
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
Materials—4.3% | |||||
108,525 | AptarGroup, Inc. | $ 6,587,467 | |||
46,350 | Sensient Technologies Corporation | 2,426,423 | |||
154,800 | * | Trinseo SA | 2,435,004 | ||
99,000 | Westlake Chemical Corporation | 8,572,410 | |||
20,021,304 | |||||
Telecommunication Services—.5% | |||||
197,975 | NTELOS Holdings Corporation | 2,106,454 | |||
Utilities—3.0% | |||||
57,275 | AGL Resources, Inc. | 2,940,498 | |||
79,000 | * | Dynegy, Inc. | 2,279,940 | ||
91,975 | Portland General Electric Company | 2,954,237 | |||
57,350 | SCANA Corporation | 2,845,134 | |||
66,625 | Wisconsin Energy Corporation | 2,864,875 | |||
13,884,684 | |||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $365,294,580) | 447,622,658 | ||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||
OBLIGATIONS—3.0% | |||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||
$6,000M | 0.003%, 11/4/2014 | 5,999,983 | |||
3,000M | 0.015%, 11/21/2014 | 2,999,936 | |||
5,000M | 0.025%, 11/21/2014 | 4,999,823 | |||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $13,999,742) 13,999,742 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $379,294,322) | 99.8 | % | 461,622,400 | ||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .2 | 984,012 | |||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 462,606,412 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
172 |
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 447,622,658 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 447,622,658 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 13,999,742 | — | 13,999,742 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 447,622,658 | $ | 13,999,742 | $ | — | $ | 461,622,400 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2014. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 173 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors International Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 4.43% for Class A shares, 3.51% for Class B shares, 4.62% for Advisor Class shares and 5.02% for Institutional Class shares. The Fund declared a dividend of 2.5 cents per share on Class A shares. The Fund did not declare dividends on Class B shares, Advisor Class shares or Institutional Class shares.
Global stock markets posted positive returns for the fiscal year, with emerging markets underperforming developed markets. International conflicts in the Ukraine and the Middle East continued to develop over the second and third quarters of 2014, and contributed to heightened market volatility, as did recent protests in Hong Kong. In the U.S., strong economic data, continued mergers and acquisitions activity, and low long-term rates have helped investor sentiment. Macro headwinds in Europe have not abated and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) is moving closer to a quantitative easing program similar to that of the U.S. Federal Reserve (the “Fed”). In emerging markets, national elections this year in Thailand, India and Turkey added some stability, while uncertainties regarding the October presidential elections in Brazil contributed to volatility in that country’s market.
Most macro events did not directly impact the Fund’s portfolio companies as we focus on identifying businesses that are less dependent on the overall economy, have unique earnings drivers, and strong underlying fundamentals. We continue to find a disproportionate number of opportunities in the Consumer Staples and Health Care sectors, and in companies with exposure to emerging markets. We are confident that our portfolio is well-positioned to perform in a variety of market environments.
The following discussion highlights specific stocks — those that provided the largest contribution to absolute performance and those that were the largest detractors for the fiscal year. As bottom-up stock pickers, we hope that you find this useful and gain a greater understanding of how we invest your capital.
Stocks that Helped Absolute Performance
Housing Development Finance Corporation (“HDFC”) benefited from the strong recovery in the Indian stock market, as investors are convinced that the newly elected reform-focused government of Narendra Modi will help transform the Indian economy for the better. In addition, the company continues to grow its earnings at a fast pace. HDFC is well placed for long-term growth as it is the leader in mortgage lending in India, with margins supported by industry-leading low costs from both efficient operations and low borrowing costs due to its excellent credit history. The company
174 |
has been around since 1977 and is usually considered a “gold standard” in terms of corporate governance and risk management. The business should benefit from better macroeconomic activity and policy, but the underpinnings were strong irrespective of who is running the government.
HDFC Bank, like Housing Development Finance Corporation, was a beneficiary of optimism surrounding Narendra Modi and strong business performance. HDFC Bank is a high-quality Indian private sector bank, which has been a cornerstone investment in the Fund for many years. It is the largest privately owned retail bank in India with a network of 3,403 branches nationwide. The bank has delivered solid growth while maintaining high credit and underwriting standards. HDFC Bank has a strong deposit franchise and powerful technology backbone that has allowed it to significantly grow earnings over the past 10 years.
Stocks that Hurt Absolute Performance
Bureau Veritas is one of the world’s largest testing and inspection companies. Its principal activities are to inspect, analyze, audit and certify products, assets and management systems. The testing business is an asset-light business that generates significant amounts of free cash flow and requires very little ongoing maintenance spending. The primary drivers of long-term growth have been, and should continue to be, the globalization of business and increasing regulation. Although there are three large listed players, namely SGS, Bureau Veritas and Intertek, the rest of the industry is still highly fragmented globally, which provides many years of roll-up acquisitions for the larger players to add very accretive M&A growth on top of their organic expansion.
After many good years, the stocks of all the companies in the testing space, not just Bureau Veritas, have been under some pressure over the last couple of years. We do not believe the stocks were expensive to begin with; over recent years, however, the multiples have de-rated a bit as underlying organic growth rates of the companies have slowed from 7%–8% to top-line rates more around the 4%–5% level. This has happened because of a combination of both cyclical and structural forces, neither of which we are concerned with over the long run. The cyclical pressures they have faced are obvious, as global growth post-crisis has generally been lower than the past normalized rates. The reason that growth rates have been slower structurally has to do with the business mix evolution of the companies. Through acquisitions over time the businesses have diversified further across the global testing and inspection landscape, resulting in greater overall diversification today, both geographically and in terms of end market exposure. In Bureau Veritas’ case, the cost of diversification has been somewhat of a dilution in its underlying top-line growth rate, particularly as the company has meaningfully beefed-up its more cyclical basic materials business
175 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
versus the shape of the company five years ago. In addition, Bureau Veritas has traditionally had a more meaningful presence in its home country of France, which is now growing much more slowly than in the past due to a combination of both cyclical and structural reasons. The good news is that the company has worked hard to reduce the overall exposure to France and Western Europe in its portfolio, and as such Bureau Veritas sits today with a fairly well-balanced global footprint.
The company is set to release a new three- or five-year long-term plan this spring, which will provide the market with valuable guidance and a vision of the business’ evolution from here forward given the changed global economy post-crisis. We believe, however, that this company, and the industry, is still a normalized mid-single digit organic top-line grower with the ability to add another 3%-6% annually to top-line growth via acquisitions, depending on the year. Given the highly attractive underlying business economics of high returns on capital, attractive and steadily increasing operating margins, and prodigious free cash flow generation, we believe Bureau Veritas is a very attractive long-term investment opportunity selling at roughly 17x forward earnings with the ability to compound earnings at a low double-digit rate.
Galaxy Entertainment, as well as other Macau-exposed gaming stocks in the market, has been weak following poor monthly gross gaming revenue (GGR) numbers. This slowdown does not surprise us and, we believe, was to be expected. The weak share price reactions do not surprise us either, given the market’s historical nature to be very short-term focused when it comes to the monthly GGR numbers in Macau. While the VIP business in the market has continued to show contractions year over year, the mass market — the portion of the market to which the Fund’s holdings are more exposed and that is at the core of our long-term investment thesis for the gaming stocks in which we invest — has continued to grow at a healthy double-digit rate. It is inevitable that the market in Macau will continue to slow; year-over-year comps are very challenging given the blistering pace of growth over the last couple of years. And, equally important in the near term, there is no new major supply coming on stream in the market, which makes incremental growth even more challenging. Given the projects currently in progress in Macau, particularly by Sands China and Galaxy, however, we are highly confident that new supply will begin to come online in mid-to-late 2015 and once again reinvigorate market growth, most critically in the mass-market.
While the ongoing corruption crackdown in China has certainly had some impact on demand, we continue to reiterate our view that the current slowdown is more cyclical and temporary in nature, and not a permanent structural change. Important indicators that bolster our view, particularly with respect to the mass-market, are hotel occupancy
176 |
rates continuing to run in the high 90% range, and table betting minimums continuing to average in the high $200 range. These facts, in our view, point to a more supply-constrained market. This is why we believe the overall market’s growth rate should begin to reaccelerate — and the Fund’s names disproportionately so — as blocks of new hotel rooms and gaming tables are added into the market beginning in mid-2015.
We believe that Galaxy’s stock was inexpensive to begin with, before the sell-off of the last six months, and is now entering “cheap” territory. With a forward P/E multiple around 14x, this is a highly predictable growth story with an increased cash return profile down the line, in our opinion.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
177 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/14) | (9/30/14) | (4/1/14–9/30/14)* |
Class A Shares | 1.66% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 988.64 | $ 8.28 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,016.75 | $ 8.39 | |
Class B Shares | 2.47% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 984.13 | $12.29 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,012.69 | $12.46 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.22% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 990.95 | $ 6.09 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.95 | $ 6.17 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 1.16% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 990.98 | $ 5.79 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.25 | $ 5.87 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2014, and are based on the total market value of investments.
178 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Fund (Class A shares), the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) EAFE Index (Gross) and the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) EAFE Index (Net).
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 4.43% | 3.51% | 4.62% | 5.02% |
Five Years | 8.76% | 7.96% | N/A | N/A |
Since Inception** | 4.33% | 3.62% | 1.77 | 2.08 |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | (1.54%) | (0.50%) | 4.62% | 5.02% |
Five Years | 7.49% | 7.66% | N/A | N/A |
Since Inception** | 3.58% | 3.62% | 1.77 | 2.08 |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Fund (Class A shares) beginning 6/27/06 (commencement of operations) with theoretical investments in the MSCI EAFE Index (Gross) and the MSCI EAFE Index (Net) (the “Indices”). The Indices are free float-adjusted market capitalization indices that measure developed foreign market equity performance, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The Indices consist of 22 developed market country indices. The MSCI EAFE Index (Gross) is calculated on a total-return basis with the maximum possible dividend reinvestment (before taxes). The MSCI EAFE Index (Net) is calculated on a total-return basis with the minimum possible dividend reinvestment (after taxes). The Indices are unmanaged and it is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the
179 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/14) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 3.25%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 3.27%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (0.83%). The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (0.39%). Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Indices figures are from Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Class A shares and Class B shares are for the periods beginning 6/27/06 (commencement of operations for those classes). The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
180 |
Portfolio of Investments
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | |
United Kingdom—18.1% | |||
233,420 | British American Tobacco, PLC | $ 13,176,111 | |
193,469 | Diageo, PLC | 5,598,479 | |
227,037 | Domino’s Pizza Group, PLC | 2,090,573 | |
134,105 | Fresnillo, PLC | 1,652,262 | |
137,599 | * | Persimmon, PLC | 2,975,716 |
105,311 | Reckitt Benckiser Group, PLC | 9,133,725 | |
190,165 | * | Rolls-Royce Holdings, PLC | 2,973,399 |
82,258 | SABMiller, PLC | 4,571,296 | |
42,171,561 | |||
Switzerland—14.4% | |||
703 | Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG | 3,510,218 | |
37,583 | Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA | 3,081,767 | |
43,902 | DKSH Holding, Ltd. | 3,273,697 | |
130,889 | Nestle SA – Registered | 9,623,184 | |
32,282 | Roche Holding AG – Genusscheine | 9,564,662 | |
2,247 | SGS SA – Registered | 4,658,615 | |
33,712,143 | |||
India—11.7% | |||
599,889 | HDFC Bank, Ltd. | 8,476,249 | |
139,621 | Hindustan Unilever, Ltd. | 1,686,484 | |
639,728 | Housing Development Finance Corporation | 10,930,586 | |
1,061,058 | ITC, Ltd. | 6,360,163 | |
27,453,482 | |||
France—7.8% | |||
22,595 | Air Liquide SA | 2,756,407 | |
176,999 | Bureau Veritas SA | 3,911,772 | |
35,538 | Essilor International SA | 3,903,025 | |
8,175 | Hermes International | 2,444,930 | |
18,832 | L’Oreal SA | 2,990,339 | |
19,463 | Pernod Ricard SA | 2,203,943 | |
18,210,416 |
181 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2014
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Canada—7.3% | ||||
83,420 | Alimentation Couche-Tard – Class “B” | $ 2,667,081 | ||
74,274 | Bank of Nova Scotia | 4,603,785 | ||
106,012 | Enbridge, Inc. | 5,087,400 | ||
88,400 | Goldcorp, Inc. | 2,040,821 | ||
45,778 | Shaw Communications, Inc. – Class “B” | 1,123,201 | ||
71,646 | Silver Wheaton Corporation | 1,430,933 | ||
16,953,221 | ||||
United States—6.9% | ||||
135,445 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 11,296,113 | ||
4,083 | * | Priceline.com, Inc. | 4,730,482 | |
16,026,595 | ||||
Netherlands—6.4% | ||||
37,455 | Core Laboratories NV | 5,481,539 | ||
239,116 | Unilever NV – CVA | 9,524,043 | ||
15,005,582 | ||||
Hong Kong—4.1% | ||||
172,403 | Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings, Ltd. | 1,210,025 | ||
336,812 | Galaxy Entertainment Group, Ltd. | 1,956,217 | ||
512,439 | Link REIT (REIT) | 2,953,168 | ||
677,995 | Sands China, Ltd. | 3,536,181 | ||
9,655,591 | ||||
Australia—3.3% | ||||
65,449 | CSL, Ltd. | 4,247,808 | ||
76,359 | Ramsay Health Care, Ltd. | 3,346,916 | ||
7,594,724 | ||||
Denmark—3.2% | ||||
157,778 | Novo Nordisk A/S – Series “B” | 7,550,596 | ||
China—2.9% | ||||
2,213 | * | Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd. (ADR) | 196,625 | |
17,765 | * | Baidu.com, Inc. (ADR) | 3,876,856 | |
185,410 | Tencent Holdings, Ltd. | 2,757,834 | ||
6,831,315 |
182
Shares or | |||||
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
Brazil—2.5% | |||||
161,542 | Cielo SA | $ 2,626,640 | |||
232,637 | Itau Unibanco Holding SA (ADR) | 3,229,002 | |||
5,855,642 | |||||
Spain—1.4% | |||||
81,789 | Grifols SA | 3,351,695 | |||
Japan—1.3% | |||||
26,000 | Daito Trust Construction Company, Ltd. | 3,070,605 | |||
South Africa—1.2% | |||||
24,441 | Naspers, Ltd. | 2,693,253 | |||
Ireland—1.0% | |||||
31,777 | Paddy Power, PLC | 2,294,932 | |||
Mexico—.9% | |||||
812,420 | Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV | 2,044,623 | |||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $170,275,855) | 220,475,976 | ||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||
OBLIGATIONS—5.1% | |||||
United States | |||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||
$5,000M | 0.003%, 11/4/2014 | 4,999,986 | |||
7,000M | 0.015%, 11/21/2014 | 6,999,851 | |||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $11,999,837) 11,999,837 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $182,275,692) | 99.5 | % | 232,475,813 | ||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .5 | 1,196,810 | |||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $ 233,672,623 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ADR | American Depositary Receipts |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
183 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2014
Accounting Standards Codification established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2014:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom | $ | 42,171,561 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 42,171,561 | ||||
Switzerland | 33,712,143 | — | — | 33,712,143 | ||||||||
India | 27,453,482 | — | — | 27,453,482 | ||||||||
France | 18,210,416 | — | — | 18,210,416 | ||||||||
Canada | 16,953,221 | — | — | 16,953,221 | ||||||||
United States | 16,026,595 | — | — | 16,026,595 | ||||||||
Netherlands | 15,005,582 | — | — | 15,005,582 | ||||||||
Hong Kong | 9,655,591 | — | — | 9,655,591 | ||||||||
Australia | 7,594,724 | — | — | 7,594,724 | ||||||||
Denmark | 7,550,596 | — | — | 7,550,596 | ||||||||
China | 6,831,315 | — | — | 6,831,315 | ||||||||
Brazil | 5,855,642 | — | — | 5,855,642 | ||||||||
Spain | 3,351,695 | — | — | 3,351,695 | ||||||||
Japan | 3,070,605 | — | — | 3,070,605 | ||||||||
South Africa | 2,693,253 | — | — | 2,693,253 | ||||||||
Ireland | 2,294,932 | — | — | 2,294,932 | ||||||||
Mexico | 2,044,623 | — | — | 2,044,623 |
184 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | $ | — | $ | 11,999,837 | $ | — | $ | 11,999,837 | ||||
Total Investments in Securities | ||||||||||||
$ | 220,475,976 | $ | 11,999,837 | $ | — | $ | 232,475,813 |
During the year ended September 30, 2014, there were no transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments that had a material impact to the Fund. This does not include transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments due to the Fund utilizing international fair value pricing during the period (see Note 1A). Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 185 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
September 30, 2014
LIMITED | |||||||||||||
CASH | DURATION HIGH | INVESTMENT | |||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | QUALITY BOND | GOVERNMENT | GRADE | ||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments in securities: | |||||||||||||
At identified cost | $ | 109,245,389 | $ | 39,809,647 | $ | 335,505,379 | $ | 509,430,726 | |||||
At value (Note 1A) | $ | 109,245,389 | $ | 39,716,664 | $ | 340,649,758 | $ | 534,341,241 | |||||
Cash | 1,549,456 | 69,351 | 3,209,165 | 6,428,460 | |||||||||
Receivables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | — | 7,294,612 | 3,200,101 | |||||||||
Interest | 525 | 292,732 | 1,055,185 | 6,618,920 | |||||||||
Shares sold | 1,000,000 | 319,573 | 276,045 | 432,417 | |||||||||
Other assets | 9,081 | — | 26,407 | 37,100 | |||||||||
Total Assets | 111,804,451 | 40,398,320 | 352,511,172 | 551,058,239 | |||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | — | 624,708 | 13,993,689 | 3,191,492 | |||||||||
Shares redeemed | 647,633 | 31,309 | 575,953 | 868,141 | |||||||||
Dividends payable | — | 13,075 | 54,565 | 180,371 | |||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | — | 17,914 | 165,236 | 267,669 | |||||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 33,182 | 4,348 | 39,036 | 57,759 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses | 36,538 | 22,146 | 47,249 | 56,695 | |||||||||
Total Liabilities | 717,353 | 713,500 | 14,875,728 | 4,622,127 | |||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 111,087,098 | $ | 39,684,820 | $ | 337,635,444 | $ | 546,436,112 | |||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 111,087,098 | $ | 39,871,213 | $ | 347,863,815 | $ | 533,183,098 | |||||
Undistributed net investment income (deficit) | — | (78,674 | ) | 157,488 | (7,197,945 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated net realized loss on investments | — | (14,736 | ) | (15,530,238 | ) | (4,459,556 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value of investments | — | (92,983 | ) | 5,144,379 | 24,910,515 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 111,087,098 | $ | 39,684,820 | $ | 337,635,444 | $ | 546,436,112 |
186 | See notes to financial statements | 187 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
September 30, 2014
LIMITED | |||||||||||||
CASH | DURATION HIGH | INVESTMENT | |||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | QUALITY BOND | GOVERNMENT | GRADE | ||||||||||
Net Assets: | |||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 108,087,694 | $ | 8,910,920 | $ | 289,927,568 | $ | 475,090,028 | |||||
Class B | $ | 404,027 | N/A | $ | 3,255,437 | $ | 4,726,589 | ||||||
Advisor Class | N/A | $ | 25,649,317 | $ | 33,698,989 | $ | 44,350,933 | ||||||
Institutional Class | $ | 2,595,377 | $ | 5,124,583 | $ | 10,753,450 | $ | 22,268,562 | |||||
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | |||||||||||||
Class A | 108,087,694 | 901,414 | 26,682,974 | 47,889,211 | |||||||||
Class B | 404,027 | N/A | 300,428 | 478,766 | |||||||||
Advisor Class | N/A | 2,587,816 | 3,103,063 | 4,469,078 | |||||||||
Institutional Class | 2,595,377 | 516,757 | 986,166 | 2,240,457 | |||||||||
Net asset value and redemption price | |||||||||||||
per share – Class A | $ | 1.00 | # | $ | 9.89 | $ | 10.87 | $ | 9.92 | ||||
Maximum offering price per share – Class A | |||||||||||||
(Net asset value/.9425)* | N/A | $ | 10.49 | $ | 11.53 | $ | 10.53 | ||||||
Net asset value and offering price per share – | |||||||||||||
Class B** | $ | 1.00 | N/A | $ | 10.84 | $ | 9.87 | ||||||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | |||||||||||||
per share – Advisor Class | N/A | $ | 9.91 | $ | 10.86 | $ | 9.92 | ||||||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | |||||||||||||
per share – Institutional Class | $ | 1.00 | $ | 9.92 | $ | 10.90 | $ | 9.94 |
# | Also maximum offering price per share. |
* | On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced (Note 8). |
** | Redemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable |
(Note 8). |
188 | See notes to financial statements | 189 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
September 30, 2014
INTERNATIONAL | ||||||||||||||
STRATEGIC | OPPORTUNITIES | FLOATING | FUND FOR | |||||||||||
INCOME | BOND | RATE | INCOME | |||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||
Investments in securities: | ||||||||||||||
Cost – Unaffiliated issuers | $ | — | $ | 127,974,887 | $ | 86,155,922 | $ | 671,604,416 | ||||||
Cost – Affiliated issuers (Note 2) | 102,879,139 | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Total cost of investments | $ | 102,879,139 | $ | 127,974,887 | $ | 86,155,922 | $ | 671,604,416 | ||||||
Value – Unaffiliated issuers (Note 1A) | $ | — | $ | 125,284,785 | $ | 85,231,650 | $ | 676,816,741 | ||||||
Value – Affiliated issuers (Note 2) | 101,613,494 | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Total value of investments | 101,613,494 | 125,284,785 | 85,231,650 | 676,816,741 | ||||||||||
Cash | 1,030,292 | 3,605,138 | 8,399,577 | 16,825,584 | ||||||||||
Receivables: | ||||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | — | 1,462,306 | 9,681,016 | ||||||||||
Dividends and interest | 354,345 | 1,276,115 | 351,098 | 11,321,859 | ||||||||||
Shares sold | 390,198 | 260,543 | 600,554 | 793,833 | ||||||||||
Unrealized gain on foreign exchange contracts (Note 7) | — | 820,233 | — | — | ||||||||||
Other assets | 3,219 | 7,256 | — | 45,049 | ||||||||||
Total Assets | 103,391,548 | 131,254,070 | 96,045,185 | 715,484,082 | ||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||
Payables: | ||||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | 1,133,420 | — | 5,182,000 | 11,778,451 | ||||||||||
Shares redeemed. | 337,522 | 358,620 | 114,010 | 2,160,826 | ||||||||||
Dividends payable | 10,335 | 45,951 | 18,125 | 587,469 | ||||||||||
Unrealized loss on foreign exchange contracts (Note 7) | — | 638,836 | — | — | ||||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | 4,429 | 90,917 | 44,033 | 436,819 | ||||||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 8,952 | 16,587 | 9,562 | 75,294 | ||||||||||
Accrued expenses | 34,159 | 40,043 | 44,894 | 65,330 | ||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 1,528,817 | 1,190,954 | 5,412,624 | 15,104,189 | ||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 101,862,731 | $ | 130,063,116 | $ | 90,632,561 | $ | 700,379,893 | ||||||
Net Assets Consist of: | ||||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 102,021,293 | $ | 133,888,516 | $ | 91,793,917 | $ | 862,190,729 | ||||||
Undistributed net investment income (deficit) | 310,748 | (852,208 | ) | (197,266 | ) | (4,787,781 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and | ||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 796,335 | (380,068 | ) | (39,818 | ) | (162,235,380 | ) | |||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value of investments | ||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | (1,265,645 | ) | (2,593,124 | ) | (924,272 | ) | 5,212,325 | |||||||
Total | $ | 101,862,731 | $ | 130,063,116 | $ | 90,632,561 | $ | 700,379,893 |
190 | See notes to financial statements | 191 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
September 30, 2014
INTERNATIONAL | |||||||||||||
STRATEGIC | OPPORTUNITIES | FLOATING | FUND FOR | ||||||||||
INCOME | BOND | RATE | INCOME | ||||||||||
Net Assets: | |||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 101,540,027 | $ | 80,197,463 | $ | 50,361,117 | $ | 621,617,858 | |||||
Class B | N/A | N/A | N/A | $ | 4,689,671 | ||||||||
Advisor Class | $ | 322,704 | $ | 33,851,161 | $ | 34,942,210 | $ | 31,131,591 | |||||
Institutional Class | N/A | $ | 16,014,492 | $ | 5,329,234 | $ | 42,940,773 | ||||||
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | |||||||||||||
Class A | 10,217,477 | 8,144,260 | 5,099,639 | 239,768,747 | |||||||||
Class B | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1,813,618 | |||||||||
Advisor Class | 32,520 | 3,435,874 | 3,537,291 | 12,003,932 | |||||||||
Institutional Class | N/A | 1,620,127 | 540,450 | 16,485,916 | |||||||||
Net asset value and redemption price | |||||||||||||
per share – Class A | $ | 9.94 | $ | 9.85 | $ | 9.88 | $ | 2.59 | |||||
Maximum offering price per share – Class A | |||||||||||||
(Net asset value/.9425)* | $ | 10.55 | $ | 10.45 | $ | 10.48 | $ | 2.75 | |||||
Net asset value and offering price per share – | |||||||||||||
Class B** | N/A | N/A | N/A | $ | 2.59 | ||||||||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | |||||||||||||
per share – Advisor Class | $ | 9.92 | $ | 9.85 | $ | 9.88 | $ | 2.59 | |||||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | |||||||||||||
per share – Institutional Class | N/A | $ | 9.88 | $ | 9.86 | $ | 2.60 |
* | On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced (Note 8). |
** | Redemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable |
(Note 8). |
192 | See notes to financial statements | 193 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
TOTAL | EQUITY | GROWTH & | |||||||||||
RETURN | INCOME | INCOME | GLOBAL | ||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments in securities: | |||||||||||||
At identified cost | $ | 587,992,851 | $ | 404,834,714 | $ | 1,082,814,614 | $ | 379,738,565 | |||||
At value (Note 1A) | $ | 778,560,334 | $ | 554,543,726 | $ | 1,788,593,847 | $ | 405,638,663 | |||||
Cash | 1,060,265 | 518,925 | 934,963 | 1,224,312 | |||||||||
Receivables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | 809,174 | 1,514,717 | 3,108,450 | 3,450,046 | |||||||||
Dividends and interest | 3,255,689 | 853,187 | 1,855,515 | 618,525 | |||||||||
Shares sold | 534,255 | 760,288 | 981,125 | 321,399 | |||||||||
Other assets | 46,257 | 32,732 | 104,192 | 21,222 | |||||||||
Total Assets | 784,265,974 | 558,223,575 | 1,795,578,092 | 411,274,167 | |||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | — | 704,308 | — | 4,372,500 | |||||||||
Shares redeemed | 1,229,932 | 752,019 | 2,970,619 | 439,736 | |||||||||
Dividends payable | 41,556 | 38,056 | 21,644 | — | |||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | 487,306 | 363,191 | 1,092,026 | 326,160 | |||||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 88,598 | 61,947 | 196,237 | 51,039 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses | 57,121 | 42,306 | 95,431 | 53,769 | |||||||||
Total Liabilities | 1,904,513 | 1,961,827 | 4,375,957 | 5,243,204 | |||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 782,361,461 | $ | 556,261,748 | $ | 1,791,202,135 | $ | 406,030,963 | |||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 576,161,579 | $ | 379,709,463 | $ | 1,020,152,689 | $ | 309,098,065 | |||||
Undistributed net investment income (deficit) | (4,206,683 | ) | 2,202,699 | 4,328,044 | (39,488 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated net realized gain on investments | |||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 19,839,082 | 24,640,574 | 60,942,169 | 71,090,426 | |||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation in value of investments | |||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 190,567,483 | 149,709,012 | 705,779,233 | 25,881,960 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 782,361,461 | $ | 556,261,748 | $ | 1,791,202,135 | $ | 406,030,963 |
194 | See notes to financial statements | 195 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
TOTAL | EQUITY | GROWTH & | ||||||||||||
RETURN | INCOME | INCOME | GLOBAL | |||||||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 767,353,951 | $ | 510,981,327 | $ | 1,632,920,400 | $ | 332,416,322 | ||||||
Class B | $ | 10,016,153 | $ | 5,721,468 | $ | 25,496,663 | $ | 4,023,450 | ||||||
Advisor Class | $ | 2,106,244 | $ | 32,159,791 | $ | 123,039,368 | $ | 66,589,814 | ||||||
Institutional Class | $ | 2,885,113 | $ | 7,399,162 | $ | 9,745,704 | $ | 3,001,377 | ||||||
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | ||||||||||||||
Class A | 39,089,977 | 51,140,390 | 71,734,129 | 38,399,082 | ||||||||||
Class B | 519,745 | 582,615 | 1,196,235 | 545,335 | ||||||||||
Advisor Class | 107,220 | 3,217,922 | 5,386,154 | 7,635,954 | ||||||||||
Institutional Class | 146,803 | 737,757 | 427,868 | 343,044 | ||||||||||
Net asset value and redemption price per share – Class A | $ | 19.63 | $ | 9.99 | $ | 22.76 | $ | 8.66 | ||||||
Maximum offering price per share – Class A | ||||||||||||||
(Net asset value/.9425)* | $ | 20.83 | $ | 10.60 | $ | 24.15 | $ | 9.19 | ||||||
Net asset value and offering price per share – Class B** | $ | 19.27 | $ | 9.82 | $ | 21.31 | $ | 7.38 | ||||||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | $ | 19.64 | $ | 9.99 | $ | 22.84 | $ | 8.72 | ||||||
per share – Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | $ | 19.65 | $ | 10.03 | $ | 22.78 | $ | 8.75 | ||||||
per share – Institutional Class |
* | On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced (Note 8). |
** | Redemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable |
(Note 8). |
196 | See notes to financial statements | 197 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
SELECT | SPECIAL | ||||||||||||
GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | ||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments in securities: | |||||||||||||
At identified cost | $ | 253,894,252 | $ | 536,295,821 | $ | 379,294,322 | $ | 182,275,692 | |||||
At value (Note 1A) | $ | 368,990,133 | $ | 854,067,303 | $ | 461,622,400 | $ | 232,475,813 | |||||
Cash | 1,544,109 | 958,115 | 1,751,901 | 1,926,888 | |||||||||
Receivables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | 2,958,098 | — | — | |||||||||
Dividends and interest | 276,223 | 366,352 | 264,664 | 833,219 | |||||||||
Shares sold | 331,218 | 614,453 | 235,903 | 167,916 | |||||||||
Other assets | 21,483 | 49,737 | 31,346 | 14,568 | |||||||||
Total Assets | 371,163,166 | 859,014,058 | 463,906,214 | 235,418,404 | |||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | — | 4,905 | 253,610 | 928,660 | |||||||||
Shares redeemed | 410,795 | 1,480,764 | 613,459 | 525,719 | |||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | 247,243 | 550,446 | 333,913 | 206,469 | |||||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 47,074 | 93,693 | 59,976 | 38,715 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses | 35,832 | 55,036 | 38,844 | 46,218 | |||||||||
Total Liabilities | 740,944 | 2,184,844 | 1,299,802 | 1,745,781 | |||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 370,422,222 | $ | 856,829,214 | $ | 462,606,412 | $ | 233,672,623 | |||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 261,961,720 | $ | 484,399,617 | $ | 357,530,449 | $ | 205,264,533 | |||||
Undistributed net investment income | 61,136 | 1,327,725 | 303,663 | 842,889 | |||||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | |||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | (6,696,515 | ) | 53,330,390 | 22,444,222 | (22,617,385 | ) | |||||||
Net unrealized appreciation in value of investments | |||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 115,095,881 | 317,771,482 | 82,328,078 | 50,182,586 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 370,422,222 | $ | 856,829,214 | $ | 462,606,412 | $ | 233,672,623 |
198 | See notes to financial statements | 199 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
SELECT | SPECIAL | |||||||||||||||
GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | |||||||||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 330,594,795 | $ | 805,113,090 | $ | 425,957,043 | $ | 193,174,182 | ||||||||
Class B | $ | 4,867,577 | $ | 12,144,788 | $ | 4,441,018 | $ | 2,893,201 | ||||||||
Advisor Class | $ | 31,902,414 | $ | 35,733,348 | $ | 26,458,377 | $ | 35,248,565 | ||||||||
Institutional Class | $ | 3,057,436 | $ | 3,837,988 | $ | 5,749,974 | $ | 2,356,675 | ||||||||
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 30,128,526 | 19,686,351 | 15,985,054 | 14,791,208 | ||||||||||||
Class B | 495,616 | 356,194 | 208,512 | 233,281 | ||||||||||||
Advisor Class | 2,896,462 | 867,309 | 990,538 | 2,685,145 | ||||||||||||
Institutional Class | 276,459 | 93,274 | 214,198 | 178,709 | ||||||||||||
Net asset value and redemption price per share – Class A | $ | 10.97 | $ | 40.90 | $ | 26.65 | $ | 13.06 | ||||||||
Maximum offering price per share – Class A | ||||||||||||||||
(Net asset value/.9425)* | $ | 11.64 | $ | 43.40 | $ | 28.28 | $ | 13.86 | ||||||||
Net asset value and offering price per share – Class B** | $ | 9.82 | $ | 34.10 | $ | 21.30 | $ | 12.40 | ||||||||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | $ | 11.01 | $ | 41.20 | $ | 26.71 | $ | 13.13 | ||||||||
per share – Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | ||||||||||||||||
per share – Institutional Class | $ | 11.06 | $ | 41.15 | $ | 26.84 | $ | 13.19 |
* | On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced (Note 8). |
** | Redemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable |
(Note 8). |
200 | See notes to financial statements | 201 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2014
LIMITED | |||||||||||||
CASH | DURATION HIGH | INVESTMENT | |||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | QUALITY BOND* | GOVERNMENT | GRADE | ||||||||||
Investment Income | |||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 101,401 | $ | 79,286 | $ | 10,146,567 | $ | 23,442,986 | |||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | |||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 631,440 | 45,233 | 2,367,485 | 3,713,443 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | N/A | 5,381 | 980,277 | 1,543,436 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | 4,508 | N/A | 38,782 | 53,897 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class A | 479,540 | 3,214 | 492,051 | 723,103 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class B | 1,616 | N/A | 10,593 | 16,752 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Advisor Class | N/A | 2,808 | 23,010 | 23,672 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Institutional Class | 780 | 1,071 | 1,980 | 4,183 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 37,173 | 55,657 | 57,951 | 90,801 | |||||||||
Custodian fees | 21,349 | 3,298 | 32,334 | 41,344 | |||||||||
Registration fees | 55,025 | 73,367 | 54,690 | 59,100 | |||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 15,761 | 200 | 19,578 | 25,120 | |||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 6,523 | 69 | 17,420 | 27,273 | |||||||||
Other expenses | 26,505 | 3,856 | 84,010 | 80,189 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 1,280,220 | 194,154 | 4,180,161 | 6,402,313 | |||||||||
Less: Expenses waived (Note 3) | (1,178,505 | ) | (143,148 | ) | (412,844 | ) | (608,141 | ) | |||||
Expenses paid indirectly (Note 1G) | (314 | ) | (48 | ) | (590 | ) | (646 | ) | |||||
Net expenses | 101,401 | 50,958 | 3,766,727 | 5,793,526 | |||||||||
Net investment income | — | 28,328 | 6,379,840 | 17,649,460 | |||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments (Note 2): | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | — | 1,982 | (19,344 | ) | 13,046,431 | ||||||||
Net unrealized loss on investments | — | (92,983 | ) | (259,062 | ) | (206,910 | ) | ||||||
Net gain (loss) on investments | — | (91,001 | ) | (278,406 | ) | 12,839,521 | |||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting | |||||||||||||
from Operations | $ | — | $ | (62,673 | ) | $ | 6,101,434 | $ | 30,488,981 |
*From May 19, 2014 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014. |
202 | See notes to financial statements | 203 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2014
INTERNATIONAL | |||||||||||||
STRATEGIC | OPPORTUNITIES | FLOATING | FUND FOR | ||||||||||
INCOME | BOND | RATE* | INCOME | ||||||||||
Investment Income | |||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 106 | $ | 3,667,028 | (a) | $ | 2,146,575 | $ | 41,414,789 | ||||
Dividends from affiliate (Note 2) | 3,033,716 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Total income | 3,033,822 | 3,667,028 | 2,146,575 | 41,414,789 | |||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | |||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 38,112 | 818,220 | 381,838 | 5,097,440 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | 227,972 | 266,357 | 133,705 | 1,957,905 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | N/A | N/A | N/A | 49,795 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class A | 84,302 | 165,058 | 69,085 | 971,290 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class B | N/A | N/A | N/A | 12,845 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Advisor Class | 88 | 23,610 | 16,638 | 23,552 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Institutional Class | N/A | 2,331 | 1,039 | 8,124 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 90,700 | 34,753 | 152,820 | 105,924 | |||||||||
Custodian fees | 5,054 | 62,619 | 15,459 | 44,289 | |||||||||
Registration fees | 34,725 | 40,100 | 47,270 | 56,550 | |||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 13,960 | 12,050 | 6,692 | 34,298 | |||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 3,777 | 4,676 | 2,250 | 34,275 | |||||||||
Other expenses | 15,835 | 18,602 | 52,484 | 122,792 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 514,525 | 1,448,376 | 879,280 | 8,519,079 | |||||||||
Less: Expenses (waived) repaid to advisor (Note 3) | 95,428 | (94,746 | ) | (223,535 | ) | (154,381 | ) | ||||||
Expenses paid indirectly (Note 1G) | — | — | (1,335 | ) | (1,743 | ) | |||||||
Net expenses | 609,953 | 1,353,630 | 654,410 | 8,362,955 | |||||||||
Net investment income | 2,423,869 | 2,313,398 | 1,492,165 | 33,051,834 | |||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments, Affiliate and | |||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Transactions (Notes 2 and 7): | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |||||||||||||
Investments | — | 807,468 | (7,835 | ) | 6,767,267 | ||||||||
Affiliate | 697,928 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Capital gain distribution from affiliate | 100,350 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | (1,078,332 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, affiliate and | |||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 798,278 | (270,864 | ) | (7,835 | ) | 6,767,267 | |||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on: | |||||||||||||
Investments | — | 353,905 | (924,272 | ) | (3,544,808 | ) | |||||||
Affiliate | (665,576 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | 181,397 | — | — | |||||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments, affiliate and | |||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | (665,576 | ) | 535,302 | (924,272 | ) | (3,544,808 | ) | ||||||
Net gain (loss) on investments, affiliate and | |||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 132,702 | 264,438 | (932,107 | ) | 3,222,459 | ||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting | |||||||||||||
from Operations | $ | 2,556,571 | $ | 2,577,836 | $ | 560,058 | $ | 36,274,293 |
* | From October 21, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014. |
(a) | Net of $34,642 foreign taxes withheld. |
204 | See notes to financial statements | 205 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2014
TOTAL | EQUITY | GROWTH & | |||||||||||
RETURN | INCOME | INCOME | GLOBAL | ||||||||||
Investment Income | |||||||||||||
Dividends | $ | 8,696,809 | (a) | $ | 13,742,746 | (b) | $ | 33,935,407 | (c) | $ | 5,714,278 | (d) | |
Interest | 8,611,176 | 16,431 | 7,449 | 2,757 | |||||||||
Total income | 17,307,985 | 13,759,177 | 33,942,856 | 5,717,035 | |||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | |||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 5,231,792 | 3,963,963 | 11,841,703 | 3,563,497 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | 2,188,583 | 1,532,395 | 4,946,245 | 1,012,967 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | 102,342 | 62,263 | 271,771 | 43,095 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class A | 1,017,218 | 702,086 | 2,218,818 | 639,766 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class B | 22,953 | 17,655 | 59,823 | 13,167 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Advisor Class | 337 | 7,088 | 17,843 | 21,603 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Institutional Class | 828 | 2,163 | 2,800 | 903 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 71,291 | 46,474 | 141,926 | 44,569 | |||||||||
Custodian fees | 29,113 | 18,473 | 50,785 | 153,328 | |||||||||
Registration fees | 64,100 | 55,775 | 66,875 | 54,150 | |||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 37,503 | 25,096 | 73,231 | 25,180 | |||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 38,103 | 26,750 | 86,769 | 17,743 | |||||||||
Other expenses | 101,567 | 57,942 | 160,341 | 74,183 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 8,905,730 | 6,518,123 | 19,938,930 | 5,664,151 | |||||||||
Less: Expenses waived (Note 3) | — | — | — | (187,088 | ) | ||||||||
Expenses paid indirectly (Note 1G) | (5,365 | ) | (3,914 | ) | (12,581 | ) | — | ||||||
Net expenses | 8,900,365 | 6,514,209 | 19,926,349 | 5,477,063 | |||||||||
Net investment income | 8,407,620 | 7,244,968 | 14,016,507 | 239,972 | |||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | |||||||||||||
and Foreign Currency Transactions (Note 2): | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |||||||||||||
Investments | 25,772,693 | 30,301,068 | 70,159,616 | 79,175,353 | |||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | — | — | (36,204 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and | |||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 25,772,693 | 30,301,068 | 70,159,616 | 79,139,149 | |||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments and | |||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 35,444,536 | 33,659,925 | 156,112,611 | (46,358,367 | ) | ||||||||
Net gain on investments and foreign currency transactions | 61,217,229 | 63,960,993 | 226,272,227 | 32,780,782 | |||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | 69,624,849 | $ | 71,205,961 | $ | 240,288,734 | $ | 33,020,754 |
(a) | Net of $9,716 foreign taxes withheld |
(b) | Net of $35,313 foreign taxes withheld |
(c) | Net of $39,921 foreign taxes withheld |
(d) | Net of $390,227 foreign taxes withheld |
206 | See notes to financial statements | 207 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2014
SELECT | SPECIAL | ||||||||||||
GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | ||||||||||
Investment Income | |||||||||||||
Dividends | $ | 4,719,838 | $ | 11,345,881 | (e) | $ | 6,353,130 | $ | 4,810,517 | (f) | |||
Interest | 880 | 8,384 | 5,619 | 2,412 | |||||||||
Total income | 4,720,718 | 11,354,265 | 6,358,749 | 4,812,929 | |||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | |||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 2,700,907 | 5,946,486 | 3,860,388 | 2,289,999 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | 1,021,386 | 2,396,847 | 1,302,708 | 637,894 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | 53,227 | 131,651 | 48,548 | 31,615 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class A | 588,810 | 1,169,896 | 759,354 | 462,125 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class B | 13,892 | 30,227 | 14,849 | 11,182 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Advisor Class | 6,668 | 22,552 | 19,526 | 21,791 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Institutional Class | 878 | 1,075 | 1,758 | 707 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 39,199 | 70,434 | 69,341 | 37,954 | |||||||||
Custodian fees | 10,422 | 29,502 | 23,258 | 184,141 | |||||||||
Registration fees | 54,050 | 64,235 | 53,884 | 53,750 | |||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 22,059 | 42,348 | 29,217 | 23,137 | |||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 17,923 | 41,910 | 22,743 | 11,286 | |||||||||
Other expenses | 40,060 | 85,354 | 57,120 | 51,293 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 4,569,481 | 10,032,517 | 6,262,694 | 3,816,874 | |||||||||
Less: Expenses waived (Note 3) | — | — | (204,291 | ) | — | ||||||||
Expenses paid indirectly (Note 1G) | — | (5,977 | ) | (3,317 | ) | — | |||||||
Net expenses | 4,569,481 | 10,026,540 | 6,055,086 | 3,816,874 | |||||||||
Net investment income | 151,237 | 1,327,725 | 303,663 | 996,055 | |||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | �� | ||||||||||||
and Foreign Currency Transactions (Note 2): | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |||||||||||||
Investments | 24,549,198 | 54,891,351 | 23,112,572 | 4,470,760 | |||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | — | — | (24,650 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized gain on investments | |||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 24,549,198 | 54,891,351 | 23,112,572 | 4,446,110 | |||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and | |||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 35,452,488 | 49,674,327 | 25,222,633 | 4,414,390 | |||||||||
Net gain on investments and foreign currency transactions | 60,001,686 | 104,565,678 | 48,335,205 | 8,860,500 | |||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | 60,152,923 | $ | 105,893,403 | $ | 48,638,868 | $ | 9,856,555 |
(e) | Net of $23,344 foreign taxes withheld |
(f) | Net of $525,883 foreign taxes withheld |
208 | See notes to financial statements | 209 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS |
LIMITED | |||||||||||||||||||||
DURATION | |||||||||||||||||||||
HIGH | |||||||||||||||||||||
QUALITY | |||||||||||||||||||||
CASH MANAGEMENT | BOND | GOVERNMENT | INVESTMENT GRADE | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | * | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 28,328 | $ | 6,379,840 | $ | 5,897,172 | $ | 17,649,460 | $ | 17,781,707 | |||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | — | — | 1,982 | (19,344 | ) | (2,524,401 | ) | 13,046,431 | 6,707,102 | ||||||||||||
Net unrealized depreciation of investments | — | — | (92,983 | ) | (259,062 | ) | (12,376,919 | ) | (206,910 | ) | (30,887,049 | ) | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | — | — | (62,673 | ) | 6,101,434 | (9,004,148 | ) | 30,488,981 | (6,398,240 | ) | |||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | — | — | (30,500 | ) | (7,662,961 | ) | (10,605,675 | ) | (20,331,273 | ) | (20,739,540 | ) | |||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | — | — | N/A | (62,062 | ) | (119,679 | ) | (179,088 | ) | (222,878 | ) | ||||||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | N/A | N/A | (28,533 | ) | (480,975 | ) | (13 | ) | (1,094,669 | ) | (19 | ) | |||||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | — | — | (64,687 | ) | (198,725 | ) | (29,051 | ) | (750,388 | ) | (110,770 | ) | |||||||||
Total dividends | — | — | (123,720 | ) | (8,404,723 | ) | (10,754,418 | ) | (22,355,418 | ) | (21,073,207 | ) | |||||||||
Share Transactions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 211,817,957 | 170,296,304 | 13,237,212 | 45,726,997 | 71,815,747 | 81,171,489 | 133,038,106 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | — | 30,054 | 7,192,044 | 9,909,442 | 18,921,205 | 19,197,738 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (234,002,418 | ) | (175,051,743 | ) | (4,316,496 | ) | (116,060,110 | ) | (89,063,124 | ) | (176,833,988 | ) | (113,252,520 | ) | |||||||
(22,184,461 | ) | (4,755,439 | ) | 8,950,770 | (63,141,069 | ) | (7,337,935 | ) | (76,741,294 | ) | 38,983,324 | ||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 697,875 | 593,663 | N/A | 276,364 | 451,982 | 479,354 | 746,634 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | — | N/A | 58,547 | 113,260 | 171,931 | 213,612 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (864,912 | ) | (918,318 | ) | N/A | (1,768,116 | ) | (1,952,936 | ) | (2,158,463 | ) | (2,498,053 | ) | ||||||||
(167,037 | ) | (324,655 | ) | N/A | (1,433,205 | ) | (1,387,694 | ) | (1,507,178 | ) | (1,537,807 | ) | |||||||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | N/A | 25,824,235 | 52,153,063 | 1,000 | 71,243,411 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | N/A | N/A | 28,441 | 474,247 | 14 | 1,078,449 | 19 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | N/A | (146,922 | ) | (18,897,640 | ) | — | (27,970,711 | ) | — | |||||||||||
N/A | N/A | 25,705,754 | 33,729,670 | 1,014 | 44,351,149 | 1,019 | |||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 3,463,169 | 1,000 | 11,067,703 | 9,215,018 | 4,663,814 | 16,142,663 | 11,445,833 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | — | 29,424 | 16,394 | 20 | 70,885 | 20 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (868,792 | ) | — | (5,882,438 | ) | (3,085,830 | ) | — | (3,456,464 | ) | (1,909,933 | ) | |||||||||
2,594,377 | 1,000 | 5,214,689 | 6,145,582 | 4,663,834 | 12,757,084 | 9,535,920 | |||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from share transactions | (19,757,121 | ) | (5,079,094 | ) | 39,871,213 | (24,699,022 | ) | (4,060,781 | ) | (21,140,239 | ) | 46,982,456 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | (19,757,121 | ) | (5,079,094 | ) | 39,684,820 | (27,002,311 | ) | (23,819,347 | ) | (13,006,676 | ) | 19,511,009 | |||||||||
Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period | 130,844,219 | 135,923,313 | — | 364,637,755 | 388,457,102 | 559,442,788 | 539,931,779 | ||||||||||||||
End of period† | $ | 111,087,098 | $ | 130,844,219 | $ | 39,684,820 | $ | 337,635,444 | $ | 364,637,755 | $ | 546,436,112 | $ | 559,442,788 | |||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (78,674 | ) | $ | 157,488 | $ | 55,298 | $ | (7,197,945 | ) | $ | (6,419,736 | ) |
*From May 19, 2014 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014. |
210 | See notes to financial statements | 211 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
LIMITED | |||||||||||||||||||||
DURATION | |||||||||||||||||||||
HIGH | |||||||||||||||||||||
QUALITY | |||||||||||||||||||||
CASH MANAGEMENT | BOND | GOVERNMENT | INVESTMENT GRADE | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | * | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||
Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 211,817,957 | 170,296,304 | 1,329,865 | 4,190,804 | 6,400,413 | 8,191,662 | 13,140,993 | ||||||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | — | 3,032 | 659,440 | 885,161 | 1,903,981 | 1,903,029 | ||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (234,002,418 | ) | (175,051,743 | ) | (431,483 | ) | (10,645,942 | ) | (7,966,458 | ) | (17,813,078 | ) | (11,224,653 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | (22,184,461 | ) | (4,755,439 | ) | 901,414 | (5,795,698 | ) | (680,884 | ) | (7,717,435 | ) | 3,819,369 | |||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 697,875 | 593,663 | N/A | 25,432 | 40,139 | 48,509 | 73,648 | ||||||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | — | N/A | 5,382 | 10,117 | 17,366 | 21,171 | ||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (864,912 | ) | (918,318 | ) | N/A | (162,492 | ) | (173,828 | ) | (218,455 | ) | (246,564 | ) | ||||||||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | (167,037 | ) | (324,655 | ) | N/A | (131,678 | ) | (123,572 | ) | (152,580 | ) | (151,745 | ) | ||||||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | N/A | N/A | 2,599,761 | 4,795,733 | 89 | 7,160,663 | 98 | ||||||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | N/A | N/A | 2,870 | 43,538 | 1 | 107,780 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Redeemed | N/A | N/A | (14,815 | ) | (1,736,298 | ) | — | (2,799,465 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Net increase in Advisor Class shares outstanding | N/A | N/A | 2,587,816 | 3,102,973 | 90 | 4,468,978 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 3,463,169 | 1,000 | 1,106,791 | 842,500 | 424,709 | 1,630,886 | 1,148,312 | ||||||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | — | 2,954 | 1,499 | 2 | 7,117 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (868,792 | ) | — | (592,988 | ) | (282,544 | ) | — | (349,768 | ) | (196,092 | ) | |||||||||
Net increase in Institutional Class shares outstanding | 2,594,377 | 1,000 | 516,757 | 561,455 | 424,711 | 1,288,235 | 952,222 |
*From May 19, 2014 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014. |
212 | See notes to financial statements | 213 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
INTERNATIONAL | FLOATING | FUND FOR | ||||||||||||||||||||||
STRATEGIC INCOME | OPPORTUNITIES BOND | RATE | INCOME | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2014 | 2013 | * | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | ** | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 2,423,869 | $ | 344,830 | $ | 2,313,398 | $ | 443,170 | $ | 1,492,165 | $ | 33,051,834 | $ | 33,007,680 | ||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 697,928 | 20,787 | (270,864 | ) | 1,307,814 | (7,835 | ) | 6,767,267 | 17,247,717 | |||||||||||||||
Capital gain distributions from affiliate (Note 2) | 100,350 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments, affiliate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | (665,576 | ) | (600,069 | ) | 535,302 | (3,503,871 | ) | (924,272 | ) | (3,544,808 | ) | (15,580,379 | ) | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 2,556,571 | (234,452 | ) | 2,577,836 | (1,752,887 | ) | 560,058 | 36,274,293 | 34,675,018 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | (2,130,034 | ) | (321,799 | ) | (2,397,230 | ) | (2,062,847 | ) | (1,126,276 | ) | (34,202,186 | ) | (36,486,900 | ) | ||||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | (227,682 | ) | (268,095 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | (7,391 | ) | (15 | ) | (280,534 | ) | (15 | ) | (486,626 | ) | (807,661 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | N/A | N/A | (289,799 | ) | (59,034 | ) | (108,512 | ) | (1,802,302 | ) | (276,219 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class A | (22,344 | ) | — | — | (64,140 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class B | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Advisor Class | (63 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Institutional Class | N/A | N/A | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions | (2,159,832 | ) | (321,814 | ) | (2,967,563 | ) | (2,186,036 | ) | (1,721,414 | ) | (37,039,831 | ) | (37,031,243 | ) | ||||||||||
Share Transactions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 61,761,010 | 49,792,921 | 22,197,260 | 88,008,741 | 84,453,964 | 88,358,374 | 109,644,866 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 2,063,899 | 309,020 | 2,306,579 | 2,062,264 | 1,080,800 | 29,346,065 | 31,001,180 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (10,026,335 | ) | (1,201,230 | ) | (43,936,569 | ) | (6,702,089 | ) | (34,565,629 | ) | (144,333,701 | ) | (93,323,531 | ) | ||||||||||
53,798,574 | 48,900,711 | (19,432,730 | ) | 83,368,916 | 50,969,135 | (26,629,262 | ) | 47,322,515 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 920,956 | 933,907 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 182,565 | 214,951 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | (1,414,505 | ) | (1,797,374 | ) | |||||||||||||||
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | (310,984 | ) | (648,516 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 455,009 | 1,000 | 37,423,299 | 1,000 | 39,741,189 | 41,261,269 | 1,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 7,328 | 15 | 276,872 | 15 | 478,322 | 784,845 | 29 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (140,379 | ) | — | (3,255,720 | ) | — | (4,793,984 | ) | (9,955,691 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
321,958 | 1,015 | 34,444,451 | 1,015 | 35,425,527 | 32,090,423 | 1,029 | ||||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | N/A | 12,728,446 | 9,541,985 | 5,506,088 | 25,179,719 | 18,832,421 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | N/A | N/A | 15,013 | 15 | 6,590 | 157,410 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | N/A | (3,462,799 | ) | (2,376,040 | ) | (113,423 | ) | (521,931 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
N/A | N/A | 9,280,660 | 7,165,960 | 5,399,255 | 24,815,198 | 18,832,451 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net increase from share transactions | 54,120,532 | 47,901,726 | 24,292,381 | 90,535,891 | 91,793,917 | 29,965,375 | 65,507,479 | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets | 54,517,271 | 47,345,460 | 23,902,654 | 86,596,968 | 90,632,561 | 29,199,837 | 63,151,254 | |||||||||||||||||
Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of period | 47,345,460 | — | 106,160,462 | 19,563,494 | — | 671,180,056 | 608,028,802 | |||||||||||||||||
End of period† | $ | 101,862,731 | $ | 47,345,460 | $ | 130,063,116 | $ | 106,160,462 | $ | 90,632,561 | $ | 700,379,893 | $ | 671,180,056 | ||||||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | 310,748 | $ | 23,016 | $ | (852,208 | ) | $ | 62,663 | $ | (197,266 | ) | $ | (4,787,781 | ) | $ | (2,865,084 | ) |
* | From April 3, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013. |
** | From October 21, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014. |
214 | See notes to financial statements | 215 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
INTERNATIONAL | FLOATING | FUND FOR | |||||||||||||||||||
STRATEGIC INCOME | OPPORTUNITIES BOND | RATE | INCOME | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2014 | 2013 | * | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | ** | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 6,172,502 | 4,931,628 | 2,244,112 | 8,628,619 | 8,442,630 | 33,280,697 | 41,692,426 | ||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 205,859 | 31,663 | 232,553 | 205,187 | 108,155 | 11,057,224 | 11,809,665 | ||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (1,001,182 | ) | (122,993 | ) | (4,410,954 | ) | (669,057 | ) | (3,451,146 | ) | (54,349,959 | ) | (35,531,467 | ) | |||||||
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | 5,377,179 | 4,840,298 | (1,934,289 | ) | 8,164,749 | 5,099,639 | (10,012,038 | ) | 17,970,624 | ||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 347,575 | 354,898 | ||||||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 68,849 | 81,867 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | (533,762 | ) | (683,943 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | (117,338 | ) | (247,178 | ) | ||||||||||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 45,636 | 100 | 3,729,318 | 98 | 3,969,777 | 15,465,806 | 376 | ||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 731 | 2 | 27,485 | 1 | 47,955 | 295,797 | 11 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (13,949 | ) | — | (321,028 | ) | — | (480,441 | ) | (3,758,058 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net increase in Advisor Class shares outstanding | 32,418 | 102 | 3,435,775 | 99 | 3,537,291 | 12,003,545 | 387 | ||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | N/A | N/A | 1,267,310 | 948,832 | 551,165 | 9,477,561 | 7,144,978 | ||||||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | N/A | N/A | 1,506 | 1 | 661 | 59,086 | 11 | ||||||||||||||
Redeemed | N/A | N/A | (359,024 | ) | (238,498 | ) | (11,376 | ) | (195,720 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Net increase in Institutional Class shares outstanding | N/A | N/A | 909,792 | 710,335 | 540,450 | 9,340,927 | 7,144,989 |
* | From April 3, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013. |
** | From October 21, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014. |
216 | See notes to financial statements | 217 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
TOTAL RETURN | EQUITY INCOME | GROWTH & INCOME | GLOBAL | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 8,407,620 | $ | 8,737,825 | $ | 7,244,968 | $ | 7,276,941 | $ | 14,016,507 | $ | 15,233,797 | $ | 239,972 | $ | 1,977,912 | ||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 25,772,693 | 15,481,867 | 30,301,068 | 22,666,688 | 70,159,616 | 49,811,355 | 79,139,149 | 28,883,970 | ||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 35,444,536 | 54,506,102 | 33,659,925 | 46,472,134 | 156,112,611 | 245,762,325 | (46,358,367 | ) | 20,625,048 | |||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 69,624,849 | 78,725,794 | 71,205,961 | 76,415,763 | 240,288,734 | 310,807,477 | 33,020,754 | 51,486,930 | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | (11,589,796 | ) | (11,460,204 | ) | (7,308,606 | ) | (7,018,270 | ) | (14,693,099 | ) | (16,526,451 | ) | (1,571,087 | ) | (1,424,622 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | (84,218 | ) | (129,605 | ) | (33,822 | ) | (60,686 | ) | — | (183,967 | ) | — | (18,090 | ) | ||||||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | (16,709 | ) | (9 | ) | (215,775 | ) | (8 | ) | (443,703 | ) | (4 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | (50,101 | ) | (10 | ) | (152,607 | ) | (21,919 | ) | (116,706 | ) | (5 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class A | (15,149,081 | ) | (7,978,527 | ) | (8,100,460 | ) | — | (51,578,337 | ) | — | (4,253,988 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class B | (229,503 | ) | (154,041 | ) | (105,356 | ) | — | (937,957 | ) | — | (67,698 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Net realized gains – Advisor Class | (24 | ) | — | (18 | ) | — | (37 | ) | — | (15 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Institutional Class | (53,776 | ) | — | (129,941 | ) | — | (270,881 | ) | — | (35,709 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
Total distributions | (27,173,208 | ) | (19,722,396 | ) | (16,046,585 | ) | (7,100,883 | ) | (68,040,720 | ) | (16,710,427 | ) | (5,928,497 | ) | (1,442,712 | ) | ||||||||
Share Transactions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 144,374,381 | 151,808,639 | 85,872,353 | 80,787,524 | 230,925,355 | 225,005,030 | 88,234,191 | 26,527,993 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 26,449,062 | 19,242,664 | 15,249,050 | 6,932,698 | 65,872,831 | 16,393,701 | 5,753,231 | 1,405,678 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (109,213,517 | ) | (96,571,663 | ) | (117,865,104 | ) | (72,530,693 | ) | (365,688,742 | ) | (216,966,800 | ) | (102,920,706 | ) | (43,281,094 | ) | ||||||||
61,609,926 | 74,479,640 | (16,743,701 | ) | 15,189,529 | (68,890,556 | ) | 24,431,931 | (8,933,284 | ) | (15,347,423 | ) | |||||||||||||
Class B: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 1,484,620 | 1,802,068 | 623,623 | 633,835 | 2,413,322 | 2,358,307 | 441,711 | 326,341 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 313,625 | 283,547 | 139,178 | 60,686 | 936,712 | 183,800 | 67,598 | 18,090 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (2,589,358 | ) | (3,729,618 | ) | (2,039,550 | ) | (2,314,718 | ) | (8,384,142 | ) | (7,717,456 | ) | (1,222,951 | ) | (1,008,810 | ) | ||||||||
(791,113 | ) | (1,644,003 | ) | (1,276,749 | ) | (1,620,197 | ) | (5,034,108 | ) | (5,175,349 | ) | (713,642 | ) | (664,379 | ) | |||||||||
Advisor Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 2,798,827 | 1,000 | 38,036,716 | 1,000 | 133,528,089 | 1,000 | 73,936,631 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 15,483 | 9 | 214,429 | 8 | 440,632 | 4 | 15 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (733,664 | ) | — | (7,273,987 | ) | — | (16,342,521 | ) | — | (9,881,401 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
2,080,646 | 1,009 | 30,977,158 | 1,008 | 117,626,200 | 1,004 | 64,055,245 | 1,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 3,082,826 | 1,000 | 7,047,542 | 4,650,735 | 9,598,181 | 1,000 | 2,976,002 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 103,878 | 10 | 62,617 | 6 | 387,588 | 5 | 35,709 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (439,595 | ) | — | (5,441,217 | ) | — | (1,078,926 | ) | — | (231,983 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
2,747,109 | 1,010 | 1,668,942 | 4,650,741 | 8,906,843 | 1,005 | 2,779,728 | 1,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from share transactions | 65,646,568 | 72,837,656 | 14,625,650 | 18,221,081 | 52,608,379 | 19,258,591 | 57,188,047 | (16,009,802 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets | 108,098,209 | 131,841,054 | 69,785,026 | 87,535,961 | 224,856,393 | 313,355,641 | 84,280,304 | 34,034,416 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 674,263,252 | 542,422,198 | 486,476,722 | 398,940,761 | 1,566,345,742 | 1,252,990,101 | 321,750,659 | 287,716,243 | ||||||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 782,361,461 | $ | 674,263,252 | $ | 556,261,748 | $ | 486,476,722 | $ | 1,791,202,135 | $ | 1,566,345,742 | $ | 406,030,963 | $ | 321,750,659 | ||||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | (4,206,683 | ) | $ | (2,274,431 | ) | $ | 2,202,699 | $ | 2,668,541 | $ | 4,328,044 | $ | 5,564,922 | $ | (39,488 | ) | $ | 1,142,588 |
218 | See notes to financial statements | 219 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
TOTAL RETURN | EQUITY INCOME | GROWTH & INCOME | GLOBAL | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Shares Issued and Redeemed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 7,452,842 | 8,646,376 | 8,880,010 | 9,628,589 | 10,508,710 | 12,146,401 | 10,363,103 | 3,616,109 | ||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 1,370,681 | 1,125,446 | 1,572,760 | 834,640 | 2,994,974 | 930,022 | 669,759 | 202,547 | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (5,641,693 | ) | (5,485,124 | ) | (12,182,540 | ) | (8,689,334 | ) | (16,660,016 | ) | (11,774,440 | ) | (12,264,036 | ) | (5,920,135 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | 3,181,830 | 4,286,698 | (1,729,770 | ) | 1,773,895 | (3,156,332 | ) | 1,301,983 | (1,231,174 | ) | (2,101,479 | ) | ||||||||||||
Class B: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 78,340 | 104,561 | 65,461 | 75,670 | 117,647 | 135,778 | 60,567 | 51,787 | ||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 16,587 | 17,051 | 14,671 | 7,547 | 45,560 | 11,774 | 9,184 | 3,025 | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (136,994 | ) | (217,312 | ) | (214,501 | ) | (285,676 | ) | (408,507 | ) | (451,729 | ) | (168,404 | ) | (159,896 | ) | ||||||||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | (42,067 | ) | (95,700 | ) | (134,369 | ) | (202,459 | ) | (245,300 | ) | (304,177 | ) | (98,653 | ) | (105,084 | ) | ||||||||
Advisor Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 143,455 | 56 | 3,918,285 | 119 | 6,074,233 | 54 | 8,758,177 | 137 | ||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 784 | 1 | 21,322 | 1 | 19,212 | — | 2 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (37,076 | ) | — | (721,805 | ) | — | (707,345 | ) | — | (1,122,362 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
Net increase in Advisor Class shares outstanding | 107,163 | 57 | 3,217,802 | 120 | 5,386,100 | 54 | 7,635,817 | 137 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 164,468 | 56 | 742,515 | 523,137 | 458,273 | 54 | 365,617 | 137 | ||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 5,378 | 1 | 6,432 | 1 | 17,604 | — | 4,128 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (23,100 | ) | — | (534,328 | ) | — | (48,063 | ) | — | (26,838 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
Net increase in Institutional Class shares outstanding | 146,746 | 57 | 214,619 | 523,138 | 427,814 | 54 | 342,907 | 137 |
220 | See notes to financial statements | 221 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
SELECT GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SPECIAL SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 151,237 | $ | 705,574 | $ | 1,327,725 | $ | 3,453,410 | $ | 303,663 | $ | 1,557,781 | $ | 996,055 | $ | 645,888 | ||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 24,549,198 | 37,621,367 | 54,891,351 | 49,631,929 | 23,112,572 | 78,785,374 | 4,446,110 | 6,541,337 | ||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 35,452,488 | 5,639,836 | 49,674,327 | 134,682,038 | 25,222,633 | (9,595,192 | ) | 4,414,390 | 5,511,859 | |||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 60,152,923 | 43,966,777 | 105,893,403 | 187,767,377 | 48,638,868 | 70,747,963 | 9,856,555 | 12,699,084 | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | (137,030 | ) | — | (3,087,350 | ) | (4,707,638 | ) | — | (1,635,146 | ) | (446,680 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | — | — | — | (106,969 | ) | — | (19,139 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | — | — | (13,000 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class A | — | — | (46,623,738 | ) | (14,500,437 | ) | (66,745,164 | ) | (14,034,907 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class B | — | — | (963,735 | ) | (394,685 | ) | (931,080 | ) | (232,335 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Advisor Class | — | — | (73 | ) | — | (179 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Institutional Class | — | — | (184,762 | ) | — | (841,692 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total distributions | (137,030 | ) | — | (50,872,658 | ) | (19,709,729 | ) | (68,518,115 | ) | (15,921,527 | ) | (446,680 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Share Transactions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 53,114,679 | 49,260,112 | 122,773,450 | 109,567,095 | 58,194,508 | 55,016,522 | 56,437,318 | 65,131,798 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 136,182 | — | 49,375,149 | 19,127,611 | 66,412,691 | 15,590,531 | 444,022 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (95,715,532 | ) | (47,680,903 | ) | (146,548,697 | ) | (96,351,212 | ) | (90,955,373 | ) | (55,639,919 | ) | (89,103,615 | ) | (27,541,316 | ) | ||||||||
(42,464,671 | ) | 1,579,209 | 25,599,902 | 32,343,494 | 33,651,826 | 14,967,134 | (32,222,275 | ) | 37,590,482 | |||||||||||||||
Class B: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 386,548 | 374,300 | 1,414,422 | 1,226,999 | 380,874 | 350,983 | 324,644 | 262,698 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 960,343 | 500,972 | 930,707 | 251,359 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (1,717,261 | ) | (1,650,653 | ) | (4,831,017 | ) | (4,525,679 | ) | (1,382,358 | ) | (1,385,228 | ) | (755,235 | ) | (604,520 | ) | ||||||||
(1,330,713 | ) | (1,276,353 | ) | (2,456,252 | ) | (2,797,708 | ) | (70,777 | ) | (782,886 | ) | (430,591 | ) | (341,822 | ) | |||||||||
Advisor Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 37,235,367 | 1,000 | 38,736,137 | 1,000 | 30,546,664 | 1,000 | 40,013,722 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 73 | — | 179 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (6,791,191 | ) | — | (4,324,733 | ) | — | (4,688,154 | ) | — | (4,422,545 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
30,444,176 | 1,000 | 34,411,477 | 1,000 | 25,858,689 | 1,000 | 35,591,177 | 1,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 2,935,532 | 1,000 | 3,896,239 | 1,000 | 6,063,035 | 1,000 | 2,538,693 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | — | — | 197,762 | — | 841,692 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (321,723 | ) | — | (461,518 | ) | — | (895,279 | ) | — | (289,287 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
2,613,809 | 1,000 | 3,632,483 | 1,000 | 6,009,448 | 1,000 | 2,249,406 | 1,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from share transactions | (10,737,399 | ) | 304,856 | 61,187,610 | 29,547,786 | 65,449,186 | 14,186,248 | 5,187,717 | 37,250,660 | |||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets | 49,278,494 | 44,271,633 | 116,208,355 | 197,605,434 | 45,569,939 | 69,012,684 | 14,597,592 | 49,949,744 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 321,143,728 | 276,872,095 | 740,620,859 | 543,015,425 | 417,036,473 | 348,023,789 | 219,075,031 | 169,125,287 | ||||||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 370,422,222 | $ | 321,143,728 | $ | 856,829,214 | $ | 740,620,859 | $ | 462,606,412 | $ | 417,036,473 | $ | 233,672,623 | $ | 219,075,031 | ||||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income of | $ | 61,136 | $ | 46,929 | $ | 1,327,725 | $ | 3,100,350 | $ | 303,663 | $ | — | $ | 842,889 | $ | 318,164 |
222 | See notes to financial statements | 223 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
SELECT GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SPECIAL SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Shares Issued and Redeemed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 5,061,027 | 5,861,743 | 3,041,896 | 3,285,077 | 2,135,234 | 2,140,339 | 4,368,338 | 5,267,583 | ||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 13,057 | — | 1,233,146 | 645,331 | 2,538,712 | 658,662 | 34,908 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (9,110,597 | ) | (5,668,289 | ) | (3,653,483 | ) | (2,908,153 | ) | (3,369,616 | ) | (2,174,522 | ) | (6,840,847 | ) | (2,228,081 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | (4,036,513 | ) | 193,454 | 621,559 | 1,022,255 | 1,304,330 | 624,479 | (2,437,601 | ) | 3,039,502 | ||||||||||||||
Class B: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 41,564 | 49,006 | 41,918 | 43,411 | 17,126 | 16,135 | 26,251 | 22,103 | ||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | — | — | 28,599 | 19,864 | 44,235 | 12,644 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (182,682 | ) | (219,786 | ) | (138,149 | ) | (161,529 | ) | (63,202 | ) | (64,381 | ) | (60,153 | ) | (50,706 | ) | ||||||||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | (141,118 | ) | (170,780 | ) | (67,632 | ) | (98,254 | ) | (1,841 | ) | (35,602 | ) | (33,902 | ) | (28,603 | ) | ||||||||
Advisor Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 3,509,456 | 118 | 970,944 | 30 | 1,162,137 | 39 | 3,011,540 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | — | — | 2 | — | 7 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (613,112 | ) | — | (103,667 | ) | — | (171,645 | ) | — | (326,473 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
Net increase in Advisor Class shares outstanding | 2,896,344 | 118 | 867,279 | 30 | 990,499 | 39 | 2,685,067 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 307,236 | 118 | 99,807 | 30 | 214,447 | 39 | 200,933 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | — | — | 4,925 | — | 32,040 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (30,895 | ) | — | (11,488 | ) | — | (32,328 | ) | — | (22,302 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
Net increase in Institutional Class shares outstanding | 276,341 | 118 | 93,244 | 30 | 214,159 | 39 | 178,631 | 78 |
224 | See notes to financial statements | 225 |
Notes to Financial Statements
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
1. Significant Accounting Policies—First Investors Income Funds (“Income Funds”) and First Investors Equity Funds (“Equity Funds”), each a Delaware statutory trust (each a “Trust”, collectively, “the Trusts”), are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) as open-end management investment companies and operate as series funds. The Income Funds issue shares of beneficial interest in the Cash Management Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Strategic Income Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Floating Rate Fund and Fund For Income. The Equity Funds issue shares of beneficial interest in the Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund (formerly Value Fund), Growth & Income Fund, Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund and International Fund (each a “Fund”, collectively, “the Funds”). The Trusts account separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each Fund. The objective of each Fund as of September 30, 2014, is as follows:
Cash Management Fund seeks to earn a high rate of current income consistent with the preservation of capital and maintenance of liquidity.
Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund seeks current income consistent with low volatility of principal.
Government Fund seeks to achieve a significant level of current income which is consistent with security and liquidity of principal.
Investment Grade Fund seeks to generate a maximum level of income consistent with investment in investment grade debt securities.
Strategic Income Fund seeks a high level of current income.
International Opportunities Bond Fund seeks total return consisting of income and capital appreciation.
Floating Rate Fund seeks a high level of current income.
Fund For Income seeks high current income.
Total Return Fund seeks high, long-term total investment return consistent with moderate investment risk.
Equity Income Fund seeks total return.
Growth & Income Fund seeks long-term growth of capital and current income.
Global Fund seeks long-term capital growth.
Select Growth Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
226 |
Opportunity Fund seeks long-term capital growth.
Special Situations Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
International Fund primarily seeks long-term capital growth.
A. Security Valuation—Except as provided below, a security listed or traded on an exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market is valued at its last sale price on the exchange or market where the security is principally traded, and lacking any sales, the security is valued at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices. Securities traded in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market (including securities listed on exchanges whose primary market is believed to be OTC) are valued at the mean between the last bid and asked prices based on quotes furnished by a market maker for such securities or an authorized pricing service. Fixed income securities, other than short-term debt securities that mature in 60 days or less and securities held by the Cash Management Fund, are priced by a pricing service. Other securities may also be priced by pricing services approved by the Trusts’ Board of Trustees (the “Board”). The pricing services consider security type, rating, market condition and yield data as well as market quotations, prices provided by market makers and other available information in determining value. Short-term debt securities that mature in 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost. The net asset value of the Strategic Income Fund is derived from the net asset values of the underlying Funds in which it invests.
The Funds monitor for significant events occurring prior to the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange that could have a material impact on the value of any securities that are held by the Funds. Examples of such events include trading halts, natural disasters, political events and issuer-specific developments. If the Valuation Committee of First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”) decides that such events warrant using fair value estimates, it will take such events into consideration in determining the fair values of such securities. If market quotations or prices are not readily available or determined to be unreliable, the securities will be valued at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to procedures adopted by the Board. The Funds also use estimates from a pricing service to fair value foreign equity securities in the event that fluctuation in U.S. securities markets exceed a predetermined level or if a foreign market is closed. For valuation purposes, where applicable, quotations of foreign securities in foreign currency are translated to U.S. dollar equivalents using the foreign exchange quotation in effect.
The Cash Management Fund values its portfolio securities in accordance with the amortized cost method of valuation under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act. Amortized cost is an approximation of market value of an instrument, whereby the difference between its acquisition cost and market value at maturity is amortized on a
227 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
straight-line basis over the remaining life of the instrument. The effect of changes in the market value of a security as a result of fluctuating interest rates is not taken into account and thus the amortized cost method of valuation may result in the value of a security being higher or lower than its actual market value.
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), investments held by the Funds are carried at “fair value”. As defined by ASC 820, fair value is the price that a fund would receive upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market for the investment under current market conditions. Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments.
In addition to defining fair value, ASC 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access.
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available.
Equity securities traded on an exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy to the extent that they are actively traded and valuation adjustments are not applied. The underlying funds in which Strategic Income Fund invests are also categorized in Level 1. Foreign securities that are fair valued in the event that fluctuations in U.S. securities markets exceed a predetermined level or if a foreign market is closed are categorized in Level 2. Variable and floating rate, corporate, sovereign and municipal bonds, asset backed, U.S. Government and U.S. Government Agency securities and loan participations are categorized in Level 2 to the extent that the inputs are observable and timely, otherwise they would be categorized as Level 3. Short-term notes that are valued at amortized cost are categorized in Level 2. Foreign exchange contracts that are considered derivative instruments and are valued at the net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on the instruments are
228 |
categorized in Level 2. Restricted securities and securities that are fair valued by the Valuation Committee may be categorized in either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy depending on the relative significance of valuation inputs.
The aggregate value by input level, as of September 30, 2014, for each Fund’s investments is included at the end of each Fund’s portfolio of investments.
B. Federal Income Taxes—No provision has been made for federal income taxes on net income or capital gains since it is the policy of each Fund to continue to comply with the special provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to investment companies, and to make sufficient distributions of income and capital gains (in excess of any available capital loss carryovers) to relieve it from all, or substantially all, such taxes. At September 30, 2014, capital loss carryovers were as follows:
Capital Loss Carryovers | ||||||||||||||||
Not Subject to | ||||||||||||||||
Year Capital Loss Carryovers Expire | Expiration | |||||||||||||||
Long | Short | |||||||||||||||
Fund | Total | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Term | Term | ||||||||
Limited Duration High | ||||||||||||||||
Quality Bond | $ 14,313 | $ — | $ — | $ — | $ — | $ — | $ — | $ 14,313 | ||||||||
Government | 13,380,639 | 1,909,473 | 1,063,550 | — | — | 40,595 | — | 10,367,021 | ||||||||
Investment Grade | 4,459,556 | — | — | 4,459,556 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||
International | ||||||||||||||||
Opportunities Bond | 305,637 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 305,637 | ||||||||
Fund For Income | 162,249,813 | 22,644,089 | 5,033,118 | 23,949,720 | 110,622,886 | — | — | — | ||||||||
Select Growth | 6,696,515 | — | — | — | 6,696,515 | — | — | — | ||||||||
International | 21,818,565 | — | — | — | 19,627,323 | 2,191,242 | — | — |
As a result of the passage of the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (“the Modernization Act of 2010”), losses incurred in fiscal year 2010 and beyond retain their character as short-term or long-term, have no expiration date and are utilized prior to capital loss carryovers occurring prior to the enactment of the Modernization Act of 2010.
The Funds recognize the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Funds’ tax positions and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years 2011 – 2013, or expected to be taken in the Funds’ 2014 tax returns. The Funds identify their major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal, New York State, New York City and foreign jurisdictions where the Funds make significant investments; however, the Funds are not aware of any tax
229 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
position for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next twelve months.
C. Distributions to Shareholders—Dividends from net investment income of the Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Strategic Income Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Floating Rate Fund and Fund For Income are generally declared daily and paid monthly. The Cash Management Fund declares distributions, if any, daily and pays distributions monthly. Distributions are declared from the total of net investment income plus or minus all realized short-term gains and losses on investments. Dividends from net investment income, if any, of Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund and Growth & Income Fund are declared and paid quarterly. Dividends from net investment income, if any, of Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund and International Fund are declared and paid annually. Distributions from net realized capital gains, if any, of each of the Funds are normally declared and paid annually. Income dividends and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences are primarily due to differing treatments for capital loss carryforwards, deferral of wash sales losses, post-October capital losses, late loss deferrals, net operating losses and foreign currency transactions.
D. Expense Allocation—Expenses directly charged or attributable to a Fund are paid from the assets of that Fund. General expenses of the Trusts are allocated among and charged to the assets of each Fund on a fair and equitable basis, which may be based on the relative assets of each Fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each Fund.
E. Use of Estimates—The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F. Foreign Currency Translations—The accounting records of International Opportunities Bond Fund, Global Fund and International Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Portfolio securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend income and certain expenses are translated to U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions.
230 |
International Opportunities Bond Fund, Global Fund and International Fund do not isolate that portion of gains and losses on investments which is due to changes in foreign exchange rates from that which is due to changes in market prices of the investments. These changes are included with the net realized and unrealized gains and losses from investments.
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions include gains and losses from the sales of foreign currency and gains and losses on accrued foreign dividends and related withholding taxes.
G. Other—Security transactions are generally accounted for on the first business day following the date the securities are purchased or sold, except for financial reporting purposes, which is trade date. Investments in securities issued on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are generally reflected in the assets of the Funds on the first business day following the date the securities are purchased and the Funds segregate assets for these transactions. Cost of securities is determined and gains and losses are based on the identified cost basis for both financial statement and federal income tax purposes. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or for certain foreign dividends, as soon as the Fund becomes aware of the dividends. Interest income and estimated expenses are accrued daily. Bond discounts and premiums are accreted or amortized using the interest method. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends have been provided in accordance with the Funds’ understanding of the applicable country’s tax rules and rates. The Bank of New York Mellon, custodian for the Cash Management Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Floating Rate Fund and Fund For Income, may provide credits against custodian charges based on uninvested cash balance of the Funds. For the year ended September 30, 2014, the Funds received credits in the amount of $4,676. Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. serves as custodian for the Strategic Income Fund, the International Opportunities Bond Fund and each Fund in the Equity Funds. Certain of the Equity Funds reduced expenses through brokerage service arrangements. For the year ended September 30, 2014, expenses were reduced by a total of $31,154 for certain of the Equity Funds under these arrangements.
231 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
2. Security Transactions—For the year ended September 30, 2014, purchases and sales of securities and long-term U.S. Government obligations (excluding U.S. Treasury bills, short-term securities and foreign currencies) were as follows:
Long-Term U.S. | ||||||||
Securities | Government Obligations | |||||||
Cost of | Proceeds | Cost of | Proceeds | |||||
Fund | Purchases | of Sales | Purchases | of Sales | ||||
Limited Duration | ||||||||
High Quality Bond | $ 34,140,560 | $ 1,363,978 | $ 6,392,223 | $ 1,810,652 | ||||
Government | 318,485,406 | 353,012,879 | 170,099,585 | 171,386,076 | ||||
Investment Grade | 269,902,741 | 292,106,937 | — | — | ||||
Strategic Income | 71,754,426 | 14,437,822 | — | — | ||||
International Opportunities Bond | 68,495,770 | 60,020,742 | 39,039,451 | 16,440,393 | ||||
Floating Rate | 101,800,719 | 15,295,553 | — | — | ||||
Fund For Income | 344,888,860 | 322,759,499 | — | — | ||||
Total Return | 273,277,826 | 278,669,852 | 48,483,032 | 28,225,938 | ||||
Equity Income | 140,702,602 | 136,379,510 | — | — | ||||
Growth & Income | 385,815,060 | 370,969,930 | — | — | ||||
Global | 611,419,383 | 561,921,410 | — | — | ||||
Select Growth | 118,789,064 | 132,305,287 | — | — | ||||
Opportunity | 293,362,170 | 272,774,736 | — | — | ||||
Special Situations | 251,016,706 | 243,830,003 | — | — | ||||
International | 76,967,887 | 77,140,511 | — | — |
232 |
At September 30, 2014, aggregate cost and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of securities for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Gross | Gross | Net Unrealized | |||||||
Aggregate | Unrealized | Unrealized | Appreciation | ||||||
Fund | Cost | Appreciation | Depreciation | (Depreciation) | |||||
Limited Duration | |||||||||
High Quality Bond | $ 38,894,102 | $ 3,553 | $ 180,992 | $ (177,439 | ) | ||||
Government | 33,505,379 | 7,321,967 | 2,177,588 | 5,144,379 | |||||
Investment Grade | 517,665,509 | 19,602,914 | 2,927,182 | 16,675,732 | |||||
Strategic Income | 102,886,026 | 210,484 | 1,483,016 | (1,272,532 | ) | ||||
International | |||||||||
Opportunities Bond | 128,645,698 | 1,542,995 | 4,903,908 | (3,360,913 | ) | ||||
Floating Rate | 86,408,248 | 96,867 | 1,273,465 | (1,176,598 | ) | ||||
Fund For Income | 676,463,558 | 11,390,502 | 11,037,319 | 353,183 | |||||
Total Return | 593,803,241 | 190,572,737 | 5,815,643 | 184,757,094 | |||||
Equity Income | 405,032,060 | 154,679,791 | 5,168,125 | 149,511,666 | |||||
Growth & Income | 1,088,884,029 | 715,424,257 | 15,674,438 | 699,749,819 | |||||
Global | 380,598,105 | 35,787,818 | 10,747,260 | 25,040,558 | |||||
Select Growth | 253,894,252 | 117,194,771 | 2,098,890 | 115,095,881 | |||||
Opportunity | 536,295,821 | 329,607,947 | 11,836,465 | 317,771,482 | |||||
Special Situations | 379,623,581 | 95,004,263 | 13,005,444 | 81,998,819 | |||||
International | 183,074,512 | 53,752,214 | 4,350,913 | 49,401,301 |
233 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
The Strategic Income Fund may invest in the Institutional Class shares of Cash Management Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Floating Rate Fund, Fund For Income, Equity Income Fund, Tax Exempt Income Fund and Tax Exempt Opportunities Fund. During the year ended September 30, 2014, purchases and sales of shares, dividends, capital gain distributions received and realized gains (losses) recognized by Strategic Income Fund from investments in the Institutional Class shares of the Funds were as follows:
Balance | Balance | Realized | |||||||||||||||
of Shares | of Shares | Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||
Held | Purchases/ | Sales/ | Held | Value | Dividend | Capital Gain | on Security | ||||||||||
Fund | 9/30/2013 | Additions | Reductions | 9/30/2014 | 9/30/2014 | Income | Distributions | Transactions | |||||||||
Equity Income | 523,018 | 500,456 | (486,079 | ) | 537,395 | $ 5,390,072 | $ 119,581 | $100,350 | $674,902 | ||||||||
Floating Rate | — | 511,753 | — | 511,753 | 5,045,886 | 101,922 | — | — | |||||||||
Fund For Income | 7,144,602 | 8,275,875 | (26,378 | ) | 15,394,099 | 40,024,658 | 1,644,893 | — | 2,374 | ||||||||
Government | 424,622 | 770,277 | (264,866 | ) | 930,033 | 10,137,360 | 182,331 | — | 2,836 | ||||||||
International | |||||||||||||||||
Opportunities Bond | 710,236 | 1,181,864 | (337,341 | ) | 1,554,759 | 15,361,015 | 274,787 | — | (22,910 | ) | |||||||
Investment Grade | 952,122 | 1,446,331 | (328,805 | ) | 2,069,648 | 20,572,305 | 679,504 | — | 40,726 | ||||||||
Limited Duration High | |||||||||||||||||
Quality Bond | — | 512,318 | — | 512,318 | 5,082,198 | 30,698 | — | — | |||||||||
9,754,600 | 13,198,874 | (1,443,469) | 21,510,005 | $101,613,494 | $3,033,716 | $100,350 | $697,928 |
The financial statements of each of the Funds in which Strategic Income Fund invested during the year are included within this report.
3. Advisory Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates—Certain officers of the Trusts are officers of the Trusts’ investment adviser, FIMCO, their underwriter, First Investors Corporation (“FIC”) and their transfer agent, Administrative Data Management Corp. (“ADM”). Trustees of the Trusts who are not officers or directors of FIMCO or its affiliates are remunerated by the Funds. For the year ended September 30, 2014, total trustees fees accrued by the Income Funds and Equity Funds amounted to $96,263 and $263,227, respectively.
The Investment Advisory Agreements provide as compensation to FIMCO for each Fund, an annual fee, payable monthly, at the following rates:
Cash Management Fund—.50% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended September 30, 2014, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $472,702 in advisory fees to limit the Fund’s overall expense ratio to .60% on Class A shares, 1.35% on Class B shares and .60% on Institutional Class shares. Also, FIMCO has voluntarily waived an additional $158,738 in advisory fees and assumed $502,364 of other Fund expenses to prevent a negative yield on the Fund’s shares.
234 |
Limited Duration High Quality Bond, Government and Investment Grade Funds—.66% on the first $500 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. For the period May 19, 2014 (commencement of operations) through September 30, 2014, FIMCO has waived, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement, $45,233 in advisory fees and assumed $97,915 in other expenses to limit the Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund’s overall expense ratio (exclusive of certain expenses) to 1.05% on Class A shares, .75% on Advisor Class shares and .60% on Institutional Class shares. For the periods October 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 and January 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $412,844, in advisory fees on Government Fund to limit the advisory fee to .53% and to .55%, respectively, of its average daily net assets. For the year ended September 30, 2014, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $608,141 in advisory fees on Investment Grade Fund to limit the advisory fee to .55% of its average daily net assets.
Strategic Income Fund—.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Floating Rate Fund—.60% on the first $250 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .55% on the next $250 million, .50% on the next $500 million and .45% on the next $1 billion and .40% on average daily net assets over $2 billion. For the period October 21, 2013 (commencement of operations) through September 30, 2014, FIMCO has waived, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement, $223,535 in advisory fees to limit the Fund’s overall expense ratio (exclusive of certain expenses) to 1.10% on Class A shares, .90% on Advisor Class shares and .70% on Institutional Class shares.
International Opportunities Bond Fund and Fund For Income—.75% on the first $250 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, .72% on the next $250 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $2.25 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2014, FIMCO has waived, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement, $94,746 in advisory fees to limit the International Opportunities Bond Fund’s overall expense ratio (exclusive of certain expenses) to 1.30% on Class A shares. For the year ended September 30, 2014, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $154,381 in advisory fees on Fund For Income to limit the advisory fee to .70% of its average daily net assets.
Total Return Fund—.75% on the first $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .70% on the next $200 million, .65% on the next $500 million, .60% on the next $1 billion, .55% on the next $1 billion, down to .50% on average daily net assets over $3 billion.
235 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
Equity Income, Growth & Income, Select Growth, and Opportunity Funds—.75% on the first $300 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, .72% on the next $200 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $2.25 billion.
Global Fund—.95% on the first $600 million, .92% on the next $400 million, .90% on the next $500 million and .88% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2014, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $187,088 in advisory fees to limit the advisory fee to .90% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Special Situations Fund—During the period October 1, 2013 through May 31, 2014, the rate was 1% on the first $200 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .75% on the next $300 million, .72% on the next $250 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, and .64% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. Effective June 1, 2014, the rate was changed to .90% on the first $200 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .75% on the next $300 million, .72% on the next $250 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, and .64% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2014, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $204,291 in advisory fees to limit the advisory fee to .80% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
International Fund—.98% on the first $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .95% on the next $300 million, .92% on the next $400 million, .90% on the next $500 million and .88% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion.
For the year ended September 30, 2014, total advisory fees accrued to FIMCO by the Income Funds and Equity Funds were $13,093,211 and $39,398,735, respectively, of which $2,170,320 and $391,379, respectively, was voluntarily waived by FIMCO as noted above.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund (“LDHQ”) to limit LDHQ’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.05% of the average daily net assets on Class A shares, .75% of the average daily net assets on Advisor Class shares and .60% of the average daily net assets on Institutional Class shares. The agreement expires on May 19, 2015. For the period May 19, 2014 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014, FIMCO assumed $143,148 under the terms of the agreement. FIMCO and LDHQ have agreed that any expenses of LDHQ assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by LDHQ within three years after
236 |
the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of LDHQ’s Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares to exceed the foregoing limits. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended prior to January 31, 2015, with the approval of the Board.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the Strategic Income Fund (“SIF”) to limit SIF’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.30% of the average daily net assets on Class A shares and 1.00% of the average daily net assets on Advisor Class shares. The agreement expires on January 31, 2015. For the period April 3, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013, FIMCO assumed $95,428 under the terms of the agreement. FIMCO and SIF have agreed that any expenses of SIF assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by SIF within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of SIF’s Class A shares and Advisor Class shares to exceed the foregoing limits. During the year ended September 30, 2014, SIF repaid FIMCO $95,428 pursuant to the terms of the agreement. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended prior to January 31, 2015, with the approval of the Board.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the International Opportunities Bond Fund (“IOBF”) to limit IOBF’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.30% of the average daily net assets on the Class A shares. The agreement expires on January 31, 2015. For the year ended September 30, 2014, FIMCO assumed $94,746, under the terms of the agreement. FIMCO and IOBF have agreed that any expenses of IOBF assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by IOBF within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of IOBF’s Class A shares to exceed the foregoing limits. For the period August 20, 2012 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014, the total organizational expenses and expenses incurred in excess of the above stated limitation was $601,237. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended prior to January 31, 2015, with the approval of the Board.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the Floating Rate Fund (“FRF”) to limit FRF’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses,
237 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.10% of the average daily net assets on the Class A shares, .90% of the average daily net assets on Advisor Class shares and .70% of the average daily net assets on Institutional Class shares. The agreement expires on January 31, 2015. For the period October 21, 2013 (commencement of operations) through September 30, 2014, FIMCO assumed $223,535 under the terms of the agreement. FIMCO and FRF have agreed that any expenses of FRF assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by FRF within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of FRF’s Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares to exceed the foregoing limits. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended prior to January 31, 2015, with the approval of the Board.
For the year ended September 30, 2014, FIC, as underwriter, received from the Income Funds and Equity Funds $6,785,288 and $21,242,684, respectively, in commissions in connection with the sale of shares of the Funds, after allowing $286,374 and $480,145, respectively, to other dealers. For the year ended September 30, 2014, shareholder servicing costs for the Income Funds and Equity Funds included $2,552,662 and $7,463,305, respectively, in transfer agent fees accrued to ADM, of which $44,701 was voluntarily waived by ADM on the Cash Management Fund.
ADM has entered into an agreement with the Funds to limit the transfer agency expenses for Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares (for those Funds with such classes) to 0.20% and 0.05%, of the Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares average daily net assets, respectively. The agreement expires on January 31, 2015. ADM can be reimbursed by each Class within three years after the date the expense limitation has been made by ADM, provided that such repayment does not cause the transfer agency expenses of Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares to exceed the foregoing limits. The expense limitation may be terminated or amended prior to January 31, 2015, with the approval of the Board. During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Income Funds and Equity Funds repaid ADM $111 and $278, respectively, pursuant to the terms of the agreement.
Pursuant to Distribution Plans adopted under Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, each Fund, other than the Cash Management Fund, is authorized to pay FIC a fee up to .30% of the average daily net assets of the Class A shares and 1% of the average daily net assets of the Class B shares on an annualized basis each fiscal year, payable monthly. The Cash Management Fund is authorized to pay FIC a fee up to 1% of the average daily net assets of the Class B shares. The fee consists of a distribution fee and a service fee. The service fee is paid for the ongoing servicing of clients who are
238 |
shareholders of that Fund. For the year ended September 30, 2014, total distribution plan fees accrued to FIC by the Income Funds and Equity Funds amounted to $5,262,015 and $15,783,537, respectively.
Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC, serves as investment subadviser to International Opportunities Bond Fund. Muzinich & Co., Inc., serves as investment subadviser to Floating Rate Fund and Fund For Income. Wellington Management Company, LLP serves as investment subadviser to Global Fund. Smith Asset Management Group, L.P. serves as investment subadviser to Select Growth Fund. Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. serves as investment subadviser to International Fund. The subadvisers are paid by FIMCO and not by the Funds.
4. Restricted Securities—Certain restricted securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 and may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. Unless otherwise noted, these 144A securities are deemed to be liquid. At September 30, 2014, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund held two 144A securities with an aggregate value of $862,589 representing 2.2% of the Fund’s net assets, Investment Grade Fund held twenty-three 144A securities with an aggregate value of $78,218,954 representing 14.3% of the Fund’s net assets, International Opportunities Bond Fund held three 144A securities with an aggregate value of $2,655,029 representing 2.0% of the Fund’s net assets, Floating Rate Fund held three 144A securities with an aggregate value of $599,813 representing .7% of the Fund’s net assets, Fund For Income held one hundred fourteen 144A securities with an aggregate value of $239,953,801 representing 34.3% of the Fund’s net assets and Total Return Fund held twenty-two 144A securities with an aggregate value of $24,104,538 representing 3.1% of the Fund’s net assets. Certain restricted securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and may only be sold to qualified investors. Unless otherwise noted, these Section 4(2) securities are deemed to be liquid. At September 30, 2014, Cash Management Fund held eleven Section 4(2) securities with an aggregate value of $38,994,165 representing 35.1% of the Fund’s net assets, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund held one 4(2) security with a value of $399,945 representing 1.0% of the Fund’s net assets. Certain restricted securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933 and may only be sold to qualified investors. Unless otherwise noted, these Regulation S securities are deemed to be liquid. At September 30, 2014, International Opportunities Bond Fund held one Regulation S security with a value of $1,002,848 representing .8% of the Fund’s net assets. These securities are valued as set forth in Note 1A.
5. Derivatives—The Funds (other than the Cash Management and Strategic Income Funds) may invest in derivatives such as futures contracts and options on futures
239 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
contracts (“options”), to increase income, hedge against changes in interest rates or enhance potential return.
The Funds may enter into interest rate futures contracts on U.S. Treasury obligations and options thereon that are traded on a U.S. exchange. An interest rate futures contract provides for the future sale by one party and the purchase by another party of a specified amount of a particular financial instrument (debt security) at a specified price, date, time and place. Such investments may be used for the purpose of hedging against changes in the value of a Fund’s portfolio securities due to anticipated changes in interest rates and market conditions. A public market exists for interest rate futures contracts covering a number of debt securities, including long-term U.S. Treasury Bonds, 10-year U.S. Treasury Notes and three-month U.S. Treasury Bills. No price is paid upon entering into futures contracts. Instead, upon entering into a futures contract, the Funds are required to deposit with their custodian in a segregated account in the name of the futures broker through which the transaction is effected an amount of cash or U.S. Government securities generally equal to 3%-5% or less of the contract value. This amount is known as “initial margin.”
An option on an interest rate futures contract generally gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in a futures contract at a specified exercise price at any time prior to the expiration date of the option. The Funds may purchase put and call options on interest rate futures contracts on U.S. Treasury obligations which are traded on a U.S. exchange as a hedge against changes in interest rates, and may enter into closing transactions with respect to such options to terminate existing positions. There is no guarantee such closing transactions can be effected. When writing a call or put option on a futures contract, margin also must be deposited in accordance with applicable exchange rules. Initial margin on futures contracts is in the nature of a performance bond or good-faith deposit that is returned to a Fund upon termination of the transaction, assuming all obligations have been satisfied. Under certain circumstances, such as periods of high volatility, a Fund may be required by an exchange to increase the level of its initial margin payment. Subsequent payments, called “variation margin,” to and from the broker, are made on a daily basis as the value of the futures position varies, a process known as “marking to market.” Variation margin does not involve borrowing to finance the futures transactions, but rather represents a daily settlement of a Fund’s obligation to or from a clearing organization. A Fund is also obligated to make initial and variation margin payments when it writes options on futures contracts.
To the extent that a Fund participates in the futures or options markets, it will incur investment risks and transaction costs to which it would not be subject absent the use of these strategies. The use of these strategies involves certain special risks,
240 |
including: (1) dependence on the ability of the Funds’ investment adviser, FIMCO to predict correctly movements in the direction of interest rates and securities prices; (2) imperfect correlation between the price of futures contracts and options thereon and movements in the prices of the securities or currencies being hedged; (3) the fact that skills needed to use these strategies are different from those needed to select portfolio securities; (4) the leverage (if any) that is created by investing in the option or futures contract; and (5) the possible absence of a liquid secondary market for any particular instrument at any time. If FIMCO’s prediction of movements in the direction of the securities and interest rate markets is inaccurate, the adverse consequences to that Fund may leave it in a worse position than if such strategies were not used.
During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Funds did not invest in futures contracts or options.
6. High Yield Credit Risk—The investments of Floating Rate Fund and Fund For Income in high yield securities, whether rated or unrated, may be considered speculative and subject to greater market fluctuations and risks of loss of income and principal than lower-yielding, higher-rated, fixed-income securities. The risk of loss due to default by the issuer may be significantly greater for holders of high-yielding securities, because such securities are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors of the issuer.
7. Foreign Exchange Contracts—The International Opportunities Bond Fund may enter into foreign exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of foreign currencies at negotiated rates at future dates. These contracts are considered derivative instruments and are used to decrease exposure to foreign exchange risk associated with foreign currency denominated securities held by the Fund. The Fund could be exposed to risk if counterparties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts or if the value of the foreign currency changes unfavorably. Foreign exchange contracts are “marked-to-market” daily at the applicable translation rate and the resulting unrealized gains and losses are reflected in the Fund’s assets.
241 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
The International Opportunities Bond Fund had the following foreign exchange contracts open at September 30, 2014:
Unrealized | |||||||||||||
Settlement | Foreign | Receive | Appreciation | ||||||||||
Counterparty | Date | Currency | (Deliver) | Asset (1) | Liability (1) | (Depreciation) | |||||||
HSBC | 10/10/14 | CLP | 1,840,900,000 | $3,081,675 | $3,292,070 | $(210,395 | ) | ||||||
JPMorgan | 10/22/14 | IDR | 53,310,000,000 | 4,375,051 | 4,494,279 | (119,228 | ) | ||||||
HSBC | 10/24/14 | CLP | 662,000,000 | 1,108,191 | 1,164,632 | (56,441 | ) | ||||||
Citibank | 11/7/14 | EUR | (5,850,000 | ) | 7,853,017 | 7,390,003 | 463,014 | ||||||
HSBC | 11/7/14 | EUR | 690,000 | 871,641 | 906,757 | (35,116 | ) | ||||||
HSBC | 11/7/14 | EUR | (600,000 | ) | 777,342 | 757,949 | 19,393 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley | 11/12/14 | AUD | (3,230,000 | ) | 2,975,476 | 2,826,416 | 149,060 | ||||||
Morgan Stanley | 11/12/14 | AUD | 2,450,000 | 2,143,876 | 2,268,014 | (124,138 | ) | ||||||
HSBC | 11/18/14 | CLP | 1,335,000,000 | 2,234,796 | 2,300,336 | (65,540 | ) | ||||||
HSBC | 12/15/14 | CLP | 1,061,000,000 | 1,776,118 | 1,785,660 | (9,542 | ) | ||||||
BCI | 12/17/14 | INR | 350,000,000 | 5,667,098 | 5,661,880 | 5,218 | |||||||
HSBC | 12/18/14 | HUF | 276,000,000 | 1,122,437 | 1,140,873 | (18,436 | ) | ||||||
Citibank | 1/16/15 | NZD | (4,970,000 | ) | 4,013,275 | 3,873,854 | 139,421 | ||||||
National Australia | 1/16/15 | NZD | (810,000 | ) | 652,539 | 631,352 | 21,187 | ||||||
Capital | |||||||||||||
HSBC | 1/26/15 | CLP | 930,400,000 | 1,557,494 | 1,534,554 | 22,940 | |||||||
Net unrealized gain on open foreign exchange contracts | $181,397 |
A summary of abbreviations for foreign currency appears at the end of the International Opportunities Bond Fund’s portfolio of investments.
(1) Foreign exchange contracts are not shown gross on the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. The net exposure is reflected.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments— The fair value of derivative instruments on the International Opportunities Bond Fund as of September 30, 2014, was as follows:
Assets Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | ||||||
Derivatives not accounted for | |||||||
as hedging instruments under | Statements of Assets | Statements of Assets | |||||
ASC 815 | and Liabilities Location | Value | and Liabilities Location | Value | |||
Foreign exchange contracts: | Unrealized appreciation | Unrealized depreciation | |||||
of foreign exchange | of foreign exchange | ||||||
contracts | $820,233 | contracts | $(638,836 | ) |
242 |
The effect of International Opportunities Bond Fund’s derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations are as follows:
Amount of Realized Gain or Loss Recognized on Derivatives | |||
Derivatives not accounted | Net Realized Loss | ||
for as hedging instruments | on Foreign Exchange | ||
under ASC 815 | Transactions | ||
Foreign exchange transactions | |||
International Opportunities Bond Fund | $(1,078,332 | ) | |
Amount of Change in Unrealized Gain or Loss Recognized on Derivatives | |||
Derivatives not accounted | Net Unrealized Appreciation | ||
for as hedging instruments | on Foreign Exchange | ||
under ASC 815 | Transactions | ||
Foreign exchange transactions | |||
International Opportunities Bond Fund | $181,397 |
8. Capital—The Trusts are authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest without par value. The Trusts consist of the Funds listed on the cover page, each of which is a separate and distinct series of the Trusts. Each Fund has designated four classes of shares, Class A, Class B, Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares (each, a “Class”) except for Cash Management Fund which has designated only Class A, Class B and Institutional Class shares, Strategic Income Fund which has designated only Class A and Advisor Class shares and Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund and Floating Rate Fund which have designated only Class A, Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares. Institutional Class and Advisor Class shares became available for sale to the public in May 2013 and October 2013, respectively. Not all classes of shares of each Fund may be available in all jurisdictions. Each share of each Class has an equal beneficial interest in the assets, has identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and is subject to the same terms and conditions except that expenses allocated to a Class may be borne solely by that Class as determined by the Board and a Class may have exclusive voting rights with respect to matters affecting only that Class. Cash Management Fund’s Class A, Class B and Institutional Class shares are sold without an initial sales charge; however, its Class B shares may only be acquired through an exchange of Class B shares from another First Investors eligible Fund or through the reinvestment of dividends on Class B shares and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge at the rate of 4% in the first year and declining to 0% over a six-year period, which is payable to FIC as underwriter of the Trusts. The shares sold by the other Funds have a public offering price that reflects different sales
243 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
charges and expense levels. Class A shares are sold with an initial sales charge of up to 5.75% of the amount invested and together with the Class B shares are subject to distribution plan fees as described in Note 3. Class B shares are sold without an initial sales charge, but are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge which declines in steps from 4% to 0% over a six-year period. Class B shares automatically convert into Class A shares after eight years. There are no sales charges associated with the purchase of Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares. Realized and unrealized gains or losses, investment income and expenses (other than distribution plan fees and shareholder servicing costs) are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the relative proportion of net assets to each class.
9. Litigation—The Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds have been named, and have received notice that they may be putative members of the proposed defendant class of shareholders, in a lawsuit filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on November 1, 2010, by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tribune Company (the “Committee”). The Committee is seeking to recover all payments made to beneficial owners of common stock in connection with a leveraged buyout of the Tribune Company (“LBO”), including payments made in connection with a 2007 tender offer into which the Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds tendered their shares of common stock of the Tribune Company. On December 9, 2011, the Blue Chip Fund was reorganized into the Growth & Income Fund pursuant to a Plan of Reorganization and Termination, whereby all of the assets of the Blue Chip Fund were transferred to the Growth & Income Fund, the Growth & Income Fund assumed all of the liabilities of the Blue Chip Fund, including any contingent liabilities with respect to pending or threatened litigation or actions, and shareholders of Blue Chip Fund became shareholders of Growth & Income Fund. The adversary proceeding brought by the Committee has been transferred to the Southern District of New York and administratively consolidated with other similar suits as discussed below. In addition, on June 2, 2011, the Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds were named as defendants in a lawsuit brought in connection with the Tribune Company’s LBO by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for a certain series of Senior Notes, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for a certain series of Senior Notes, and Wilmington Trust Company, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for the PHONES Notes (together, the “Bondholder Plaintiffs”) in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. The Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds have also been named in a similar suit filed on behalf of participants in Tribune defined-compensation plans (the “Retiree Plaintiffs”). That suit was also initially filed in the Supreme Court of New York but later removed and consolidated in the Southern District of New York with the other Tribune suits. As with the Bondholder Plaintiffs and the Committee,
244 |
the Retiree Plaintiffs seek to recover payments of the proceeds of the LBO. (Both of these suits have been removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and administratively consolidated with other substantially similar suits against other former Tribune shareholders (the “MDL Proceeding”). On September 23, 2013, the Judge in the MDL Proceeding dismissed various state law constructive fraudulent transfer suits, resulting in the Funds being dismissed from the Bondholder and Retiree Plaintiffs’ actions. On September 30, 2013, counsel for the plaintiffs in those suits appealed the MDL Judge’s dismissal ruling to the Second Circuit. The extent of the Funds’ potential liability in any such actions has not been determined. The Funds have been advised by counsel that the Funds could be held liable to return all or part of the proceeds received in any of these actions, as well as interest and court costs, even though the Funds had no knowledge of, or participation in, any misconduct. The Equity Income Fund received proceeds of $1,526,566 in connection with the LBO, representing 0.27% of its net assets as of September 30, 2014. The Blue Chip Fund received proceeds of $790,772 in connection with the LBO, representing 0.04% of the net assets of Growth & Income Fund as of September 30, 2014. The Equity Income and Growth & Income Funds cannot predict the outcomes of these proceedings, and thus have not accrued any of the amounts sought in the various actions in the accompanying financial statements.
245 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
10. Tax Components of Capital and Distributions to Shareholders—The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 were as follows:
Year Ended September 30, 2014 | Year Ended September 30, 2013 | |||||||||||
Distributions | Distributions | |||||||||||
Declared from | Declared from | |||||||||||
Long-Term | Long-Term | |||||||||||
Ordinary | Capital | Ordinary | Capital | |||||||||
Fund | Income | Gain | Total | Income | Gain | Total | ||||||
Limited Duration High | ||||||||||||
Quality Bond | $ 123,720 | $ — | $ 123,720 | $ — | $ — | $ — | ||||||
Government | 8,404,723 | — | 8,404,723 | 10,754,418 | — | 10,754,418 | ||||||
Investment Grade | 22,355,418 | — | 22,355,418 | 21,073,207 | — | 21,073,207 | ||||||
Strategic Income | 2,159,832 | — | 2,159,832 | 321,814 | — | 321,814 | ||||||
International Opportunities Bond | 2,967,563 | — | 2,967,563 | 2,186,036 | — | 2,186,036 | ||||||
Floating Rate | 1,721,414 | — | 1,721,414 | — | — | — | ||||||
Fund For Income | 37,039,831 | — | 37,039,831 | 37,031,243 | — | 37,031,243 | ||||||
Total Return | 14,824,484 | 12,348,724 | 27,173,208 | 13,005,892 | 6,716,504 | 19,722,396 | ||||||
Equity Income | 7,710,810 | 8,335,775 | 16,046,585 | 7,100,883 | — | 7,100,883 | ||||||
Growth & Income | 26,536,648 | 41,504,072 | 68,040,720 | 16,710,427 | — | 16,710,427 | ||||||
Global | 2,589,434 | 3,339,063 | 5,928,497 | 1,442,712 | — | 1,442,712 | ||||||
Select Growth | 137,030 | — | 137,030 | — | — | — | ||||||
Opportunity | 12,208,079 | 38,664,579 | 50,872,658 | 9,773,265 | 9,936,464 | 19,709,729 | ||||||
Special Situations | 7,180,385 | 61,337,730 | 68,518,115 | 8,673,458 | 7,248,069 | 15,921,527 | ||||||
International | 446,680 | — | 446,680 | — | — | — |
246 |
As of September 30, 2014, the components of distributable earnings (deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
Total | |||||||||||||
Undistributed | Undistributed | Capital | Other | Unrealized | Distributable | ||||||||
Ordinary | Capital | Losses | Accumulated | Appreciation | Earnings | ||||||||
Fund | Income | Gains | Carryover | Losses* | (Depreciation | ) | (Deficit) | ** | |||||
Limited Duration High | $ 5,359 | $ — | $ (14,313 | ) | $ — | $ (177,439 | ) | $ (186,393 | ) | ||||
Quality Bond | |||||||||||||
Government | 157,488 | — | (13,380,639 | ) | (2,149,599 | ) | 5,144,379 | (10,228,371 | ) | ||||
Investment Grade | 1,036,838 | — | (4,459,556 | ) | — | 16,675,732 | 13,253,014 | ||||||
Strategic Income | 601,459 | 512,511 | — | — | (1,272,532 | ) | (158,562 | ) | |||||
International | |||||||||||||
Opportunities Bond | — | — | (305,637 | ) | (74,431 | ) | (3,445,332 | )† | (3,825,400 | ) | |||
Floating Rate | 55,060 | — | — | (39,818 | ) | (1,176,598 | ) | (1,161,356 | ) | ||||
Fund For Income | 85,794 | — | (162,249,813 | ) | — | 353,183 | (161,810,836 | ) | |||||
Total Return | 2,710,591 | 18,732,198 | — | — | 184,757,094 | 206,199,883 | |||||||
Equity Income | 5,800,113 | 21,240,507 | — | — | 149,511,665 | 176,552,285 | |||||||
Growth & Income | 14,161,345 | 57,138,282 | — | — | 699,749,819 | 771,049,446 | |||||||
Global | 14,285,060 | 57,664,905 | — | (39,488 | ) | 25,022,421 | † | 96,932,898 | |||||
Select Growth | 61,136 | — | (6,696,515 | ) | — | 115,095,881 | 108,460,502 | ||||||
Opportunity | 9,995,923 | 44,662,192 | — | — | 317,771,482 | 372,429,597 | |||||||
Special Situations | 2,733,666 | 20,343,478 | — | — | 81,998,819 | 105,075,963 | |||||||
International | 870,951 | — | (21,818,565 | ) | (28,062 | ) | 49,383,766 | † | 28,408,090 |
* Other accumulated losses consist primarily of late loss deferral, post-October loss deferrals and capital loss carryovers that cannot yet be utilized.
** Differences between book distributable earnings and tax distributable earnings consist primarily of wash sales and amortization of bond premium and discounts.
† Includes currency appreciation (depreciation) for International Opportunities Bond, Global and International Funds in the amounts of $(84,419), $(18,137) and $(17,535), respectively.
247 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2014
For the year ended September 30, 2014, the following reclassifications were made to reflect permanent differences between book and tax reporting which are primarily due to the differences between book and tax treatment of investments in real estate trusts, bond premium amortization, foreign currency transactions, paydowns on securities, fund organization expenses and expiration of capital loss carryovers.
Undistributed | Accumulated | ||||||
Ordinary Income | Capital Gains | ||||||
Fund | Capital Paid In | (Deficit) | (Losses) | ||||
Limited Duration High | |||||||
Quality Bond | $ — | $ 16,718 | $ (16,718 | ) | |||
Government | (646,762 | ) | 2,127,073 | (1,480,311 | ) | ||
Investment Grade | (1,450 | ) | 3,922,631 | (3,921,181 | ) | ||
Strategic Income | (965 | ) | 1,288 | (323 | ) | ||
International Opportunities Bond | (128,270 | ) | (260,706 | 388,976 | |||
Floating Rate | — | 31,983 | (31,983 | ) | |||
Fund For Income | — | 2,087,974 | (2,087,974 | ) | |||
Total Return | — | 1,400,952 | (1,400,952 | ) | |||
Growth & Income | — | 123 | (123 | ) | |||
Global | (1,000 | ) | 149,046 | (148,046 | ) | ||
International | — | (24,650 | 24,650 |
11. Subsequent Events—Subsequent events occurring after September 30, 2014 have been evaluated for potential impact to this report through the date the financial statements were issued. There were no subsequent events to report that would have a material impact on the Funds’ financial statements.
248 |
This page left intentionally blank. |
249 |
Financial Highlights
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
The following table sets forth the per share operating performance data for a share outstanding,
total return, ratios to average net assets and other supplemental data for each fiscal year ended
September 30 unless otherwise indicated.
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Investment | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Loss on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Income | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | Income | Expenses | (a) | (Loss | ) | Rate | ||||||||||||
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $ 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1.00 | 0.00 | % | $134,103 | .30 | % | .30 | % | .00 | % | 1.08 | % | (.78 | )% | N/A | ||||||||||
2011 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 148,171 | .17 | .17 | .00 | 1.06 | (.89 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 135,028 | .12 | .12 | .00 | 1.02 | (.90 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 130,272 | .11 | .11 | .00 | .97 | (.86 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 108,088 | .08 | .08 | .00 | 1.02 | (.94 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1,739 | .30 | .30 | .00 | 1.83 | (1.53 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1,519 | .17 | .17 | .00 | 1.81 | (1.64 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 896 | .12 | .12 | .00 | 1.77 | (1.65 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 571 | .12 | .12 | .00 | 1.72 | (1.60 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 404 | .08 | .08 | .00 | 1.64 | (1.56 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | † | 1 | .15 | †† | .15 | †† | .00 | †† | 2.60 | †† | (2.45 | )†† | N/A | ||||||||||
2014 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2,595 | .08 | .08 | .00 | .66 | (.58 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014♓ | $10.00 | $ — | ⌘ | $(.05 | ) | $(.05 | ) | $.06 | — | $.06 | $9.89 | (.50 | )%† | $ 8,911 | 1.05 | %†† | 1.05 | %†† | .15 | %†† | 3.37 | %†† | (2.17 | )%†† | 19 | %† | ||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014♓ | 10.00 | .02 | ⌘ | (.05 | ) | (.03 | ) | .06 | — | .06 | 9.91 | (.28 | )† | 25,649 | .75 | †† | .75 | †† | .46 | †† | 1.02 | †† | .19 | †† | 19 | † | ||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014♓ | 10.00 | .02 | ⌘ | (.03 | ) | (.01 | ) | .07 | — | .07 | 9.92 | (.14 | )† | 5,125 | .60 | †† | .60 | †† | .53 | †† | 3.32 | †† | (2.19 | )†† | 19 | † |
250 | 251 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets Before Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Waived, Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | or Reimbursed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Investment | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Income | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | Income | Expenses | (a) | (Loss | ) | Rate | |||||||||||||
GOVERNMENT FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $11.20 | $.43 | $ .16 | $ .59 | $.43 | — | $.43 | $11.36 | 5.39 | % | $325,979 | 1.13 | % | 1.13 | % | 3.44 | % | 1.24 | % | 3.33 | % | 42 | % | ||||||||||
2011 | 11.36 | .36 | .28 | .64 | .41 | — | .41 | 11.59 | 5.73 | 346,828 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 3.12 | 1.23 | 3.01 | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 11.59 | .27 | .04 | .31 | .38 | — | .38 | 11.52 | 2.71 | 382,064 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 2.28 | 1.21 | 2.17 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 11.52 | .17 | (.43 | ) | (.26 | ) | .32 | — | .32 | 10.94 | (2.29 | ) | 355,264 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.57 | 1.21 | 1.46 | 101 | ||||||||||||||
2014 | 10.94 | .19 | ⌘ | — | .19 | .26 | — | .26 | 10.87 | 1.71 | 289,928 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.76 | 1.18 | 1.65 | 138 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 11.19 | .35 | .17 | .52 | .36 | — | .36 | 11.35 | 4.70 | 10,860 | 1.83 | 1.83 | 2.74 | 1.94 | 2.63 | 42 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 11.35 | .26 | .29 | .55 | .33 | — | .33 | 11.57 | 4.94 | 7,284 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 2.42 | 1.93 | 2.31 | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 11.57 | .17 | .07 | .24 | .30 | — | .30 | 11.51 | 2.11 | 6,393 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.59 | 1.91 | 1.47 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 11.51 | .07 | (.42 | ) | (.35 | ) | .24 | — | .24 | 10.92 | (3.06 | ) | 4,717 | 1.84 | 1.84 | .82 | 1.95 | .71 | 101 | ||||||||||||||
2014 | 10.92 | .10 | ⌘ | (.01 | ) | .09 | .17 | — | .17 | 10.84 | .86 | 3,255 | 1.89 | 1.89 | .94 | 2.00 | .83 | 138 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 11.29 | .10 | (.30 | ) | (.20 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 10.94 | (1.75 | )† | 1 | .95 | †† | .95 | †† | 1.68 | †† | 5.17 | †† | (2.54 | )†† | 101 | |||||||||
2014 | 10.94 | .23 | ⌘ | (.04 | ) | .19 | .27 | — | .27 | 10.86 | 1.73 | 33,699 | .73 | .73 | 2.06 | .84 | 1.95 | 138 | |||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 11.29 | .14 | (.31 | ) | (.17 | ) | .16 | — | .16 | 10.96 | (1.54 | )† | 4,656 | .68 | †† | .68 | †† | 2.14 | †† | .81 | †† | 2.01 | †† | 101 | |||||||||
2014 | 10.96 | .24 | ⌘ | (.01 | ) | .23 | .29 | — | .29 | 10.90 | 2.08 | 10,753 | .65 | .65 | 2.17 | .76 | 2.06 | 138 | |||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $ 9.10 | $.44 | $ .72 | $1.16 | $.45 | — | $.45 | $ 9.81 | 13.09 | % | $404,841 | 1.12 | % | 1.12 | % | 4.75 | % | 1.23 | % | 4.64 | % | 56 | % | ||||||||||
2011 | 9.81 | .40 | (.16 | ) | .24 | .43 | — | .43 | 9.62 | 2.48 | 437,094 | 1.11 | 1.11 | 3.94 | 1.22 | 3.83 | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 9.62 | .38 | .68 | 1.06 | .41 | — | .41 | 10.27 | 11.22 | 531,896 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 3.54 | 1.19 | 3.43 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 10.27 | .35 | (.46 | ) | (.11 | ) | .38 | — | .38 | 9.78 | (1.10 | ) | 543,955 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 3.20 | 1.18 | 3.09 | 33 | ||||||||||||||
2014 | 9.78 | .31 | ⌘ | .22 | .53 | .39 | — | .39 | 9.92 | 5.50 | 475,090 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 3.11 | 1.16 | 3.00 | 49 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 9.11 | .39 | .70 | 1.09 | .39 | — | .39 | 9.81 | 12.20 | 13,855 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 4.05 | 1.93 | 3.94 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 9.81 | .33 | (.16 | ) | .17 | .36 | — | .36 | 9.62 | 1.81 | 9,976 | 1.81 | 1.81 | 3.24 | 1.92 | 3.13 | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 9.62 | .32 | .66 | .98 | .34 | — | .34 | 10.26 | 10.41 | 8,036 | 1.78 | 1.78 | 2.84 | 1.89 | 2.74 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 10.26 | .27 | (.45 | ) | (.18 | ) | .32 | — | .32 | 9.76 | (1.82 | ) | 6,161 | 1.84 | 1.84 | 2.42 | 1.94 | 2.32 | 33 | ||||||||||||||
2014 | 9.76 | .22 | ⌘ | .22 | .44 | .33 | — | .33 | 9.87 | 4.53 | 4,727 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 2.24 | 2.03 | 2.13 | 49 | ||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 10.23 | .08 | (.34) | (.26 | ) | .19 | — | .19 | 9.78 | (2.53 | )† | 1 | .95 | †† | .95 | †† | 2.64 | †† | 5.17 | †† | (1.58 | )†† | 33 | ||||||||||
2014 | 9.78 | .34 | ⌘ | .20 | .54 | .40 | — | .40 | 9.92 | 5.61 | 44,351 | .69 | .69 | 3.38 | .80 | 3.27 | 49 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 10.23 | .14 | (.38 | ) | (.24 | ) | .20 | — | .20 | 9.79 | (2.37 | )† | 9,326 | .66 | †† | .66 | †† | 3.06 | †† | .77 | †† | 2.95 | †† | 33 | |||||||||
2014 | 9.79 | .35 | ⌘ | .23 | .58 | .43 | — | .43 | 9.94 | 5.98 | 22,269 | .63 | .63 | 3.51 | .74 | 3.40 | 49 |
252 | 253 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Investment | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Income | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | (Loss) | Expenses | (a) | (Loss | ) | Rate | |||||||||||||
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013♦ | $10.00 | $.14 | ◀ | $(.23 | ) | $(.09 | ) | $.13 | $ — | $.13 | $ 9.78 | (.87 | )%† | $ 47,344 | 1.30 | %††► | 1.30 | %††► | 2.88 | %††◀ | 2.10 | %††► | 2.08 | %††◀ | 19 | %† | |||||||
2014 | 9.78 | .32 | ◀⌘ | .12 | .44 | .28 | .00 | ‡ | .28 | 9.94 | 4.55 | 101,540 | .80 | ► | .80 | ► | 3.18 | ◀ | .68 | ► | 3.30 | ◀ | 20 | ||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013♦ | 10.00 | .14 | ◀ | (.22 | ) | (.08 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 9.77 | (.79 | )† | 1 | 1.00 | ††► | 1.00 | ††► | 2.89 | ††◀ | 14.79 | ††► | (10.90 | )††◀ | 19 | † | |||||||
2014 | 9.77 | .36 | ◀⌘ | .11 | .47 | .32 | .00 | ‡ | .32 | 9.92 | 4.82 | 323 | .36 | ► | .36 | ► | 3.62 | ◀ | .29 | ► | 3.69 | ◀ | 20 | ||||||||||
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012▲ | $10.00 | $.01 | $ .23 | $ .24 | $.02 | $ — | $.02 | $10.22 | 2.35 | %† | $ 19,563 | 1.30 | %†† | 1.30 | %†† | 1.10 | %†† | 9.76 | %†† | (6.12 | )%†† | 5 | %† | ||||||||||
2013 | 10.22 | .25 | (.32 | ) | (.07 | ) | .30 | .01 | .31 | 9.84 | (.72 | ) | 99,161 | 1.30 | 1.30 | .68 | 1.83 | .15 | 53 | ||||||||||||||
2014 | 9.84 | .21 | ⌘ | .07 | .28 | .27 | — | .27 | 9.85 | 2.84 | 80,197 | 1.30 | 1.30 | 2.06 | 1.41 | 1.95 | 76 | ||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 10.23 | .08 | (.31 | ) | (.23 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 9.85 | (2.26 | )† | 1 | 1.07 | †† | 1.07 | †† | (1.43 | )†† | 5.23 | †† | (5.59 | )†† | 53 | |||||||||
2014 | 9.85 | .24 | ⌘ | .04 | .28 | .28 | — | .28 | 9.85 | 2.81 | 33,851 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 2.21 | N/A | N/A | 76 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 10.23 | .12 | (.35 | ) | (.23 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 9.85 | (2.26 | )† | 6,998 | .96 | †† | .96 | †† | (1.31 | )†† | .96 | †† | (1.31 | )†† | 53 | |||||||||
2014 | 9.85 | .25 | ⌘ | .06 | .31 | .28 | — | .28 | 9.88 | 3.19 | 16,014 | .93 | .93 | 2.43 | N/A | N/A | 76 | ||||||||||||||||
FLOATING RATE FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014❖ | $10.00 | $.21 | ⌘ | $(.10 | ) | $ .11 | $.23 | — | $.23 | $ 9.88 | 1.12 | %† | $ 50,361 | 1.10 | %†† | 1.10 | %†† | 2.21 | %†† | 1.58 | %†† | 1.73 | %†† | 26 | %† | ||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014❖ | 10.00 | .25 | ⌘ | (.11 | ) | .14 | .26 | — | .26 | 9.88 | 1.43 | † | 34,942 | .90 | †† | .90 | †† | 2.63 | †† | .95 | †† | 2.58 | †† | 26 | † | ||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014❖ | 10.00 | .27 | ⌘ | (.13 | ) | .14 | .28 | — | .28 | 9.86 | 1.36 | † | 5,329 | .70 | †† | .70 | †† | 2.76 | †† | 1.06 | †† | 2.40 | †† | 26 | † |
254 | 255 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | Income | Expenses | (a) | Income | Rate | ||||||||||||||
FUND FOR INCOME | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $2.32 | $.17 | $ .18 | $.35 | $.18 | — | $.18 | $2.49 | 15.68 | % | $504,507 | 1.29 | % | 1.29 | % | 7.32 | % | 1.33 | % | 7.28 | % | 78 | % | ||||||||||
2011 | 2.49 | .17 | (.14 | ) | .03 | .17 | — | .17 | 2.35 | 1.00 | 504,839 | 1.27 | 1.27 | 6.43 | 1.30 | 6.40 | 75 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2.35 | .16 | .25 | .41 | .16 | — | .16 | 2.60 | 17.79 | 602,370 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 6.01 | 1.29 | 5.98 | 54 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2.60 | .15 | (.01 | ) | .14 | .15 | — | .15 | 2.59 | 5.55 | 647,603 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 5.17 | 1.25 | 5.15 | 60 | ||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2.59 | .12 | ⌘ | .02 | .14 | .14 | — | .14 | 2.59 | 5.38 | 621,618 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 4.67 | 1.23 | 4.65 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2.33 | .16 | .16 | .32 | .16 | — | .16 | 2.49 | 14.43 | 10,891 | 1.99 | 1.99 | 6.62 | 2.03 | 6.58 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2.49 | .15 | (.13 | ) | .02 | .16 | — | .16 | 2.35 | .38 | 7,580 | 1.97 | 1.97 | 5.75 | 2.00 | 5.72 | 75 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2.35 | .13 | .26 | .39 | .14 | — | .14 | 2.60 | 17.01 | 5,659 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 5.31 | 1.99 | 5.28 | 54 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2.60 | .13 | (.01 | ) | .12 | .13 | — | .13 | 2.59 | 4.84 | 5,001 | 1.99 | 1.99 | 4.42 | 2.01 | 4.40 | 60 | ||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2.59 | .10 | ⌘ | .02 | .12 | .12 | — | .12 | 2.59 | 4.67 | 4,690 | 2.02 | 2.02 | 3.86 | 2.04 | 3.84 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 2.66 | .06 | (.05 | ) | .01 | .08 | — | .08 | 2.59 | .23† | 1 | 1.03 | †† | 1.03 | †† | 4.59 | †† | 5.13 | †† | .49 | †† | 60 | |||||||||||
2014 | 2.59 | .12 | ⌘ | .02 | .14 | .14 | — | .14 | 2.59 | 5.42 | 31,132 | .91 | .91 | 4.83 | .93 | 4.81 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 2.66 | .03 | (.01 | ) | .02 | .08 | — | .08 | 2.60 | .66 | † | 18,575 | .81 | †† | .81 | †† | 4.93 | †† | .83 | †† | 4.91 | †† | 60 | ||||||||||
2014 | 2.60 | .13 | ⌘ | .02 | .15 | .15 | — | .15 | 2.60 | 5.59 | 42,941 | .78 | .78 | 5.07 | .80 | 5.05 | 47 |
* | Calculated without sales charges. |
** | Net of expenses waived or assumed (Note 3). |
(a) | The ratios do not include a reduction of expenses from cash balances maintained with the custodian |
or from brokerage service arrangements (Note 1G). | |
⌘ | Based on average shares during the period. |
■ | For the period April 1, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013. |
♓ | For the period May 19, 2014 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014. |
† | Not annualized |
†† | Annualized |
♦ | For the period April 3, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013. |
◀ | Recognition of net investment income by the Fund is affected by the timing of the declaration of |
dividends by the underlying investment companies in which the Fund invests. The ratio does not include | |
net investment income of the investment companies in which the Fund invests. | |
► | Does not include expenses of the investment companies in which the Fund invests. |
▲ | For the period August 20, 2012 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2012. |
❖ | For the period October 21, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014. |
‡ | Due to rounding, amount is less than .005 per share. |
256 | See notes to financial statements | 257 |
Financial Highlights
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
The following table sets forth the per share operating performance data for a share outstanding,
total return, ratios to average net assets and other supplemental data for each fiscal year ended
September 30, except as otherwise indicated.
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Investment | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Income | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | Income | Expenses | (a) | (Loss | ) | Rate | |||||||||||||
TOTAL RETURN FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $13.25 | $.28 | $ .95 | $1.23 | $.29 | $ — | $.29 | $14.19 | 9.38 | % | $360,843 | 1.37 | % | 1.37 | % | 2.02 | % | N/A | N/A | 40 | % | ||||||||||||
2011 | 14.19 | .31 | (.06 | ) | .25 | .34 | — | .34 | 14.10 | 1.65 | 384,720 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.97 | N/A | N/A | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 14.10 | .30 | 2.71 | 3.01 | .30 | — | .30 | 16.81 | 21.46 | 532,551 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.79 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 16.81 | .27 | 1.99 | 2.26 | .34 | .24 | .58 | 18.49 | 13.77 | 664,054 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.45 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 18.49 | .22 | ⌘ | 1.65 | 1.87 | .31 | .42 | .73 | 19.63 | 10.18 | 767,354 | 1.19 | 1.19 | 1.14 | N/A | N/A | 44 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 13.04 | .18 | .94 | 1.12 | .20 | — | .20 | 13.96 | 8.62 | 16,982 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 1.32 | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 13.96 | .19 | (.04 | ) | .15 | .23 | — | .23 | 13.88 | 1.01 | 12,961 | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.30 | N/A | N/A | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 13.88 | .18 | 2.65 | 2.83 | .18 | — | .18 | 16.53 | 20.49 | 10,872 | 2.02 | 2.02 | 1.09 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 16.53 | .15 | 1.95 | 2.10 | .22 | .24 | .46 | 18.17 | 12.98 | 10,207 | 2.01 | 2.01 | .71 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 18.17 | .07 | ⌘ | 1.61 | 1.68 | .16 | .42 | .58 | 19.27 | 9.29 | 10,016 | 1.97 | 1.97 | .36 | N/A | N/A | 44 | ||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 17.62 | .09 | .95 | 1.04 | .17 | — | .17 | 18.49 | 5.89† | 1 | 1.01 | †† | 1.01 | †† | 1.40 | †† | 4.76 | %†† | (2.35 | )%†† | 32 | ||||||||||||
2014 | 18.49 | .29 | ⌘ | 1.60 | 1.89 | .32 | .42 | .74 | 19.64 | 10.34 | 2,106 | .78 | .78 | 1.46 | N/A | N/A | 44 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 17.62 | .10 | .95 | 1.05 | .17 | — | .17 | 18.50 | 5.98 | † | 1 | .82 | †† | .82 | †† | 1.48 | †† | 4.35 | †† | (2.05 | )†† | 32 | |||||||||||
2014 | 18.50 | .30 | ⌘ | 1.63 | 1.93 | .36 | .42 | .78 | 19.65 | 10.55 | 2,885 | .78 | .78 | 1.55 | N/A | N/A | 44 | ||||||||||||||||
EQUITY INCOME FUND(b) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $ 6.01 | $.09 | $ .49 | $ .58 | $.09 | $ — | $.09 | $ 6.50 | 9.76 | % | $335,725 | 1.38 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.45 | % | N/A | N/A | 21 | % | ||||||||||||
2011 | 6.50 | .11 | (.30 | ) | (.19) | .11 | — | .11 | 6.20 | (3.12 | ) | 317,550 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.60 | N/A | N/A | 29 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 6.20 | .13 | 1.44 | 1.57 | .10 | — | .10 | 7.67 | 25.36 | 392,001 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.75 | N/A | N/A | 38 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 7.67 | .14 | 1.32 | 1.46 | .14 | — | .14 | 8.99 | 19.14 | 475,422 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.66 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 8.99 | .13 | ⌘ | 1.16 | 1.29 | .14 | .15 | .29 | 9.99 | 14.48 | 510,981 | 1.21 | 1.22 | 1.33 | N/A | N/A | 27 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 5.92 | .05 | .48 | .53 | .05 | — | .05 | 6.40 | 8.97 | 11,133 | 2.08 | 2.08 | .75 | N/A | N/A | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 6.40 | .06 | (.30 | ) | (.24 | ) | .06 | — | .06 | 6.10 | (3.87 | ) | 7,947 | 2.05 | 2.05 | .90 | N/A | N/A | 29 | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 6.10 | .08 | 1.42 | 1.50 | .05 | — | .05 | 7.55 | 24.56 | 6,939 | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.02 | N/A | N/A | 38 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 7.55 | .09 | 1.28 | 1.37 | .08 | — | .08 | 8.84 | 18.21 | 6,337 | 2.05 | 2.05 | .90 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 8.84 | .05 | ⌘ | 1.13 | 1.18 | .05 | .15 | .20 | 9.82 | 13.49 | 5,721 | 2.06 | 2.06 | .49 | N/A | N/A | 27 | ||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 8.40 | .08 | .58 | .66 | .07 | — | .07 | 8.99 | 7.87 | † | 1 | 1.01 | †† | 1.01 | †† | 1.78 | †† | 4.68 | %†† | (1.89 | )%†† | 32 | |||||||||||
2014 | 8.99 | .17 | ⌘ | 1.13 | 1.30 | .15 | .15 | .30 | 9.99 | 14.57 | 32,160 | .81 | .81 | 1.71 | N/A | N/A | 27 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 8.40 | .04 | .63 | .67 | .05 | — | .05 | 9.02 | 7.95 | † | 4,717 | .86 | †† | .86 | †† | 1.74 | †† | .86 | †† | 1.74 | †† | 32 | |||||||||||
2014 | 9.02 | .17 | ⌘ | 1.16 | 1.33 | .17 | .15 | .32 | 10.03 | 14.88 | 7,399 | .80 | .80 | 1.76 | N/A | N/A | 27 |
258 | 259 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Investment | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Income | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss | ) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | (Loss | ) | Expenses | (a) | (Loss | ) | Rate | ||||||||||
GROWTH & INCOME FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $11.91 | $ .09 | $ .98 | $1.07 | $.07 | $ — | $.07 | $12.91 | 9.01 | % | $ 626,370 | 1.39 | % | 1.39 | % | .68 | % | N/A | N/A | 25 | % | |||||||||||
2011 | 12.91 | .19 | (.14 | ) | .05 | .18 | — | .18 | 12.78 | .25 | 625,562 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.33 | N/A | N/A | 24 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 12.78 | .21 | 3.81 | 4.02 | .14 | — | .14 | 16.66 | 31.60 | 1,225,684 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.35 | N/A | N/A | 22 | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 16.66 | .20 | 3.90 | 4.10 | .22 | — | .22 | 20.54 | 24.86 | 1,538,582 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.11 | N/A | N/A | 20 | ||||||||||||||||
2014 | 20.54 | .18 | ⌘ | 2.92 | 3.10 | .20 | .68 | .88 | 22.76 | 15.26 | 1,632,920 | 1.15 | 1.15 | .80 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 11.22 | (.03 | ) | .95 | .92 | — | — | — | 12.14 | 8.23 | 26,160 | 2.09 | 2.09 | (.02 | ) | N/A | N/A | 25 | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 12.14 | .08 | (.12 | ) | (.04 | ) | .09 | — | .09 | 12.01 | (.44 | ) | 19,635 | 2.04 | 2.04 | .66 | N/A | N/A | 24 | |||||||||||||
2012 | 12.01 | .10 | 3.58 | 3.68 | .05 | — | .05 | 15.64 | 30.71 | 27,306 | 1.99 | 1.99 | .63 | N/A | N/A | 22 | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 15.64 | .06 | 3.67 | 3.73 | .11 | — | .11 | 19.26 | 24.02 | 27,762 | 1.96 | 1.96 | .37 | N/A | N/A | 20 | ||||||||||||||||
2014 | 19.26 | — | ⌘ | 2.73 | 2.73 | — | .68 | .68 | 21.31 | 14.32 | 25,497 | 1.93 | 1.93 | .02 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 18.49 | .13 | 2.00 | 2.13 | .08 | — | .08 | 20.54 | 11.53 | † | 1 | .97 | †† | .97 | †† | 1.31 | †† | 4.60 | %†† | (2.32 | )%†† | 20 | ||||||||||
2014 | 20.54 | .27 | ⌘ | 2.91 | 3.18 | .20 | .68 | .88 | 22.84 | 15.67 | 123,039 | .74 | .74 | 1.17 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 18.49 | .15 | 2.00 | 2.15 | .09 | — | .09 | 20.55 | 11.64 | † | 1 | .78 | †† | .78 | †† | 1.50 | †† | 4.19 | †† | (1.91 | )†† | 20 | ||||||||||
2014 | 20.55 | .27 | ⌘ | 2.92 | 3.19 | .28 | .68 | .96 | 22.78 | 15.75 | 9,746 | .74 | .74 | 1.21 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||
GLOBAL FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $ 5.73 | $ — | $ .42 | $ .42 | $.01 | $ — | $.01 | $ 6.14 | 7.33 | % | $ 269,075 | 1.72 | % | 1.72 | .04 | % | 1.75 | % | .01 | % | 92 | % | ||||||||||
2011 | 6.14 | .01 | (.61 | ) | (.60 | ) | — | — | — | 5.54 | (9.77 | ) | 241,494 | 1.67 | 1.67 | .18 | 1.70 | .15 | 103 | |||||||||||||
2012 | 5.54 | .03 | 1.24 | 1.27 | .02 | — | .02 | 6.79 | 22.88 | 283,328 | 1.68 | 1.69 | .44 | 1.70 | .42 | 94 | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 6.79 | .05 | 1.20 | 1.25 | .03 | — | .03 | 8.01 | 18.56 | 317,329 | 1.60 | 1.61 | .66 | 1.62 | .65 | 92 | ||||||||||||||||
2014 | 8.01 | — | ⌘ | .80 | .80 | .04 | .11 | .15 | 8.66 | 10.00 | 332,416 | 1.49 | 1.49 | .03 | 1.54 | (.02 | ) | 154 | ||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 5.03 | (.06 | ) | .39 | .33 | — | — | — | 5.36 | 6.56 | 6,551 | 2.42 | 2.42 | (.66 | ) | 2.45 | (.69 | ) | 92 | |||||||||||||
2011 | 5.36 | (.09 | ) | (.46 | ) | (.55 | ) | — | — | — | 4.81 | (10.26 | ) | 4,515 | 2.37 | 2.37 | (.55 | ) | 2.40 | (.58 | ) | 103 | ||||||||||
2012 | 4.81 | (.09 | ) | 1.15 | 1.06 | .01 | — | .01 | 5.86 | 21.99 | 4,388 | 2.38 | 2.39 | (.27 | ) | 2.40 | (.29 | ) | 94 | |||||||||||||
2013 | 5.86 | (.07 | ) | 1.09 | 1.02 | .02 | — | .02 | 6.86 | 17.55 | 4,419 | 2.36 | 2.36 | (.10 | ) | 2.38 | (.12 | ) | 92 | |||||||||||||
2014 | 6.86 | (.06 | )⌘ | .69 | .63 | — | .11 | .11 | 7.38 | 9.18 | 4,023 | 2.31 | 2.31 | (.79 | ) | 2.36 | (.84 | ) | 154 | |||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 7.28 | .06 | .67 | .73 | — | — | — | 8.01 | 10.03 | † | 1 | 1.27 | †† | 1.27 | †† | 1.46 | †† | 4.88 | †† | (2.15 | )†† | 92 | ||||||||||
2014 | 8.01 | — | ⌘ | .82 | .82 | — | .11 | .11 | 8.72 | 10.24 | 66,590 | 1.06 | 1.06 | .53 | 1.11 | .48 | 154 | |||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 7.28 | .06 | .68 | .74 | — | — | — | 8.02 | 10.17 | † | 1 | 1.14 | †† | 1.14 | †† | 1.55 | †† | 4.59 | †† | (1.90 | )†† | 92 | ||||||||||
2014 | 8.02 | — | ⌘ | .84 | .84 | — | .11 | .11 | 8.75 | 10.48 | 3,001 | 1.03 | 1.03 | .48 | 1.08 | .43 | 154 |
260 | 261 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss | ) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | (Loss | ) | Expenses | (a) | Loss | Rate | ||||||||||||
SELECT GROWTH FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $ 5.33 | $(.03 | ) | $ .49 | $ .46 | $ — | — | $— | $ 5.79 | 8.63 | % | $183,556 | 1.56 | % | 1.56 | % | (.48 | )% | N/A | N/A | 98 | % | |||||||||||
2011 | 5.79 | (.02 | ) | .54 | .52 | — | — | — | 6.31 | 8.98 | 203,243 | 1.45 | 1.45 | (.28 | ) | N/A | N/A | 62 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 6.31 | (.03 | ) | 1.70 | 1.67 | — | — | — | 7.98 | 26.47 | 271,019 | 1.42 | 1.42 | (.35 | ) | N/A | N/A | 53 | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 7.98 | .02 | 1.24 | 1.26 | — | — | — | 9.24 | 15.79 | 315,833 | 1.35 | 1.35 | .25 | N/A | N/A | 71 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 9.24 | — | ⌘ | 1.73 | 1.73 | .00 | ‡ | — | .00 | ‡ | 10.97 | 18.77 | 330,595 | 1.27 | 1.27 | .03 | N/A | N/A | 33 | ||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 4.94 | (.07 | ) | .46 | .39 | — | — | — | 5.33 | 7.90 | 8,423 | 2.26 | 2.26 | (1.18 | ) | N/A | N/A | 98 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 5.33 | (.07 | ) | .51 | .44 | — | — | — | 5.77 | 8.26 | 6,692 | 2.15 | 2.15 | (.98 | ) | N/A | N/A | 62 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 5.77 | (.09 | ) | 1.57 | 1.48 | — | — | — | 7.25 | 25.65 | 5,853 | 2.12 | 2.12 | (1.07 | ) | N/A | N/A | 53 | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 7.25 | (.06 | ) | 1.15 | 1.09 | — | — | — | 8.34 | 15.03 | 5,308 | 2.10 | 2.10 | (.48 | ) | N/A | N/A | 71 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 8.34 | (.07 | )⌘ | 1.55 | 1.48 | — | — | — | 9.82 | 17.75 | 4,868 | 2.06 | 2.06 | (.76 | ) | N/A | N/A | 33 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 8.46 | .01 | .79 | .80 | — | — | — | 9.26 | 9.46 | † | 1 | 1.02 | †† | 1.02 | †† | .25 | †† | 4.63 | %†† | (3.36 | )%†† | 71 | |||||||||||
2014 | 9.26 | .06 | ⌘ | 1.69 | 1.75 | — | — | — | 11.01 | 18.90 | 31,902 | .83 | .83 | .51 | N/A | N/A | 33 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 8.46 | .02 | .79 | .81 | — | — | — | 9.27 | 9.57 | † | 1 | .89 | †† | .89†† | .39 | †† | 4.32 | †† | (3.04 | )†† | 71 | ||||||||||||
2014 | 9.27 | .05 | ⌘ | 1.74 | 1.79 | — | — | — | 11.06 | 19.31 | 3,057 | .83 | .83 | .48 | N/A | N/A | 33 | ||||||||||||||||
OPPORTUNITY FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $20.76 | $ .05 | $2.65 | $2.70 | $ — | $ — | $ — | $23.46 | 13.01 | % | $402,117 | 1.44 | % | 1.44 | % | .24 | % | N/A | N/A | 40 | % | ||||||||||||
2011 | 23.46 | .17 | .49 | .66 | .05 | — | .05 | 24.07 | 2.77 | 415,392 | 1.36 | 1.36 | .62 | N/A | N/A | 37 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 24.07 | .26 | 6.10 | 6.36 | .17 | .89 | 1.06 | 29.37 | 26.99 | 529,886 | 1.35 | 1.35 | .94 | N/A | N/A | 36 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 29.37 | .18 | 9.64 | 9.82 | .26 | .80 | 1.06 | 38.13 | 34.47 | 726,942 | 1.28 | 1.28 | .56 | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 38.13 | .07 | ⌘ | 5.29 | 5.36 | .16 | 2.43 | 2.59 | 40.90 | 14.20 | 805,113 | 1.20 | 1.20 | .16 | N/A | N/A | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 18.21 | (.14 | ) | 2.37 | 2.23 | — | — | — | 20.44 | 12.25 | 20,130 | 2.14 | 2.14 | (.52 | ) | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 20.44 | (.10 | ) | .52 | .42 | .01 | — | .01 | 20.85 | 2.04 | 15,025 | 2.06 | 2.06 | (.04 | ) | N/A | N/A | 37 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 20.85 | .01 | 5.31 | 5.32 | .13 | .89 | 1.02 | 25.15 | 26.12 | 13,129 | 2.05 | 2.05 | .15 | N/A | N/A | 36 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 25.15 | (.12 | ) | 8.26 | 8.14 | .22 | .80 | 1.02 | 32.27 | 33.49 | 13,677 | 2.02 | 2.02 | (.18 | ) | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 32.27 | (.21 | )⌘ | 4.47 | 4.26 | — | 2.43 | 2.43 | 34.10 | 13.32 | 12,145 | 1.99 | 1.99 | (.63 | ) | N/A | N/A | 34 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 33.13 | .16 | 4.89 | 5.05 | — | — | — | 38.18 | 15.24 | † | 1 | .98 | †† | .98†† | .91 | †† | 4.48 | %†† | (2.59 | )%†† | 40 | ||||||||||||
2014 | 38.18 | .23 | ⌘ | 5.22 | 5.45 | — | 2.43 | 2.43 | 41.20 | 14.43 | 35,733 | .90 | .90 | .51 | N/A | N/A | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 33.13 | .19 | 4.89 | 5.08 | — | — | — | 38.21 | 15.33 | † | 1 | .85 | †† | .85†† | 1.06 | †† | 4.17 | †† | (2.26 | )†† | 40 | ||||||||||||
2014 | 38.21 | .24 | ⌘ | 5.30 | 5.54 | .17 | 2.43 | 2.60 | 41.15 | 14.66 | 3,838 | .79 | .79 | .58 | N/A | N/A | 34 |
262 | 263 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Investment | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Income | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss | ) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | (Loss | ) | Expenses | (a) | (Loss | ) | Rate | |||||||||||
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $18.40 | $(.05 | ) | $2.31 | $2.26 | $ — | $ — | $ — | $20.66 | 12.28 | % | $274,074 | 1.52 | % | 1.52 | % | (.28 | )% | 1.65 | % | (.41 | )% | 64 | % | |||||||||
2011 | 20.66 | .03 | 1.03 | 1.06 | — | — | — | 21.72 | 5.13 | 285,220 | 1.44 | 1.44 | .13 | 1.54 | .03 | 73 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 21.72 | .01 | 4.46 | 4.47 | .03 | 1.76 | 1.79 | 24.40 | 21.19 | 342,939 | 1.43 | 1.43 | .03 | 1.53 | (.07 | ) | 41 | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 24.40 | .11 | 4.68 | 4.79 | .12 | 1.00 | 1.12 | 28.07 | 20.47 | 412,102 | 1.39 | 1.39 | .42 | 1.47 | .34 | 110 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 28.07 | .02 | ⌘ | 3.16 | 3.18 | — | 4.60 | 4.60 | 26.65 | 11.65 | 425,957 | 1.33 | 1.33 | .06 | 1.38 | .01 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 16.09 | (.25 | ) | 2.11 | 1.86 | — | — | — | 17.95 | 11.56 | 7,577 | 2.22 | 2.22 | (.94 | ) | 2.35 | (1.07 | ) | 64 | ||||||||||||||
2011 | 17.95 | (.13 | ) | .92 | .79 | — | — | — | 18.74 | 4.40 | 5,884 | 2.14 | 2.14 | (.55 | ) | 2.24 | (.65 | ) | 73 | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 18.74 | (.15 | ) | 3.84 | 3.69 | — | 1.76 | 1.76 | 20.67 | 20.33 | 5,085 | 2.13 | 2.13 | (.67 | ) | 2.23 | (.77 | ) | 41 | ||||||||||||||
2013 | 20.67 | (.10 | ) | 3.96 | 3.86 | .08 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 23.45 | 19.62 | 4,932 | 2.13 | 2.13 | (.29 | ) | 2.21 | (.37 | ) | 110 | ||||||||||||||
2014 | 23.45 | (.17 | )⌘ | 2.62 | 2.45 | — | 4.60 | 4.60 | 21.30 | 10.71 | 4,441 | 2.16 | 2.16 | (.77 | ) | 2.21 | (.82 | ) | 55 | ||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 25.71 | .01 | 2.37 | 2.38 | — | — | — | 28.09 | 9.26 | † | 1 | 1.16 | †† | 1.16 | †† | .08 | †† | 4.82 | †† | (3.58 | )†† | 110 | |||||||||||
2014 | 28.09 | .12 | ⌘ | 3.10 | 3.22 | — | 4.60 | 4.60 | 26.71 | 11.82 | 26,458 | 1.01 | 1.01 | .39 | 1.06 | .34 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 25.71 | .06 | 2.37 | 2.43 | — | — | — | 28.14 | 9.45 | † | 1 | .84 | †† | .84 | †† | .42 | †† | 4.43 | †† | (3.17 | )†† | 110 | |||||||||||
2014 | 28.14 | .14 | ⌘ | 3.16 | 3.30 | — | 4.60 | 4.60 | 26.84 | 12.10 | 5,750 | .89 | .89 | .51 | .94 | .46 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||
INTERNATIONAL FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | $ 8.90 | $ .15 | $1.15 | $1.30 | $.02 | — | $ .02 | $10.18 | 14.63 | % | $129,570 | 1.97 | % | 1.97 | % | 1.33 | % | N/A | N/A | 32 | % | ||||||||||||
2011 | 10.18 | .12 | (.59 | ) | (.47 | ) | .17 | — | .17 | 9.54 | (4.70 | ) | 128,479 | 1.88 | 1.88 | 1.20 | N/A | N/A | 30 | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 9.54 | .10 | 2.20 | 2.30 | .16 | — | .16 | 11.68 | 24.34 | 165,797 | 1.82 | 1.82 | .86 | N/A | N/A | 41 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 11.68 | .04 | .81 | .85 | — | — | — | 12.53 | 7.28 | 215,873 | 1.71 | 1.71 | .34 | N/A | N/A | 31 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 12.53 | .05 | ⌘ | .50 | .55 | .02 | — | .02 | 13.06 | 4.43 | 193,174 | 1.66 | 1.66 | .39 | N/A | N/A | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 8.71 | .08 | 1.12 | 1.20 | — | — | — | 9.91 | 13.78 | 3,569 | 2.67 | 2.67 | .59 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 9.91 | .01 | (.52 | ) | (.51 | ) | .16 | — | .16 | 9.24 | (5.30 | ) | 2,983 | 2.58 | 2.58 | .30 | N/A | N/A | 30 | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 9.24 | (.04 | ) | 2.19 | 2.15 | .14 | — | .14 | 11.25 | 23.50 | 3,328 | 2.52 | 2.52 | (.02 | ) | N/A | N/A | 41 | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 11.25 | (.11 | ) | .84 | .73 | — | — | — | 11.98 | 6.49 | 3,200 | 2.46 | 2.46 | (.45 | ) | N/A | N/A | 31 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 11.98 | (.05 | )⌘ | .47 | .42 | — | — | — | 12.40 | 3.51 | 2,893 | 2.49 | 2.49 | (.42 | ) | N/A | N/A | 34 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 12.79 | .06 | (.30 | ) | (.24 | ) | — | — | — | 12.55 | (1.88 | )† | 1 | 1.45 | †† | 1.45 | †† | .97 | †† | 5.30 | %†† | (2.88 | )%†† | 31 | |||||||||
2014 | 12.55 | .14 | ⌘ | .44 | .58 | — | — | — | 13.13 | 4.62 | 35,249 | 1.27 | 1.27 | .98 | N/A | N/A | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013■ | 12.79 | .08 | (.31 | ) | (.23 | ) | — | — | — | 12.56 | (1.80 | )† | 1 | 1.19 | †† | 1.19 | †† | 1.23 | †† | 4.84 | †† | (2.42 | )†† | 31 | |||||||||
2014 | 12.56 | .12 | ⌘ | .51 | .63 | — | — | — | 13.19 | 5.02 | 2,357 | 1.17 | 1.17 | .93 | N/A | N/A | 34 |
264 | See notes to financial statements | 265 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
* | Calculated without sales charges. |
** | Net of expenses waived or assumed (Note 3). |
⌘ | Based on average shares during the period. |
†† | Annualized |
■ | For the period April 1, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013. |
(a) | The ratios do not include a reduction of expenses from cash balances maintained with the custodian or from |
brokerage service arrangements (Note 1G). | |
(b) | Prior to September 4, 2012, known as Value Fund. |
‡ | Due to rounding, amount is less than .005 per share. |
This page left intentionally blank. |
266 | 267 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
First Investors Income Funds and First Investors Equity Funds
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments of the Cash Management Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Strategic Income Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Floating Rate Fund and Fund For Income (each a series of First Investors Income Funds), and the Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund, Growth & Income Fund, Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund and International Fund (each a series of First Investors Equity Funds), as of September 30, 2014, the related statements of operations, the statements of changes in net assets, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated thereon. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of September 30, 2014, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. Where brokers have not replied to our confirmation requests, we have carried out other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
268 |
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Cash Management Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Strategic Income Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Floating Rate Fund, Fund For Income, Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund, Growth & Income Fund, Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund and International Fund, as of September 30, 2014, and the results of their operations, changes in their net assets, and their financial highlights for the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Tait, Weller & Baker LLP |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
November 26, 2014
269 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Annual Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements with Muzinich & Co., Inc. and Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC
The First Investors Income Funds’ (the “Trust”) investment advisory agreements with the Trust’s investment adviser and, as applicable, sub-advisers, on behalf of each of the Trust’s funds, can remain in effect after an initial term of no greater than two years only if they are renewed at least annually thereafter (i) by the vote of the Trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of each fund and (ii) by the vote of a majority of the Trustees who are not parties to the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreement, as applicable) or “interested persons” of any party thereto (the “Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called specifically for the purpose of voting on such approval.
The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) has four regularly scheduled and two informal meetings each year and takes into account throughout the year matters bearing on the approval of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable). The Board and its standing committees also consider at each meeting factors that are relevant to the annual renewal of each fund’s advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable), including the services and support provided to each fund and its shareholders.
On April 17, 2014 (the “April Meeting”), the Independent Trustees met in person with First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”), the Trust’s investment adviser, Trust counsel, independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees (“Independent Legal Counsel”) and others to give preliminary consideration to information bearing on the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) with respect to each fund. The primary purpose of the April Meeting was to ensure that the Independent Trustees had ample opportunity to consider matters they deemed relevant in considering the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable), and to request any additional information they considered reasonably necessary to their deliberations. The Independent Trustees also met in executive session with Independent Legal Counsel to consider the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) outside the presence of management. As part of the April Meeting, the Independent Trustees asked FIMCO to respond to certain additional questions prior to the contract approval meeting of the Board to be held on May 15, 2014 (the “May Meeting”).
At the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) between FIMCO and each of the following funds (each a “Fund” and
270 |
collectively the “Funds”): Fund For Income, Investment Grade Fund, Government Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Strategic Income Fund and Cash Management Fund. In addition, at the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the sub-advisory agreements (each, a “Sub-Advisory Agreement” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with: (1) Muzinich & Co., Inc. (“Muzinich”) with respect to the Fund For Income; and (2) Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC (“Brandywine”) with respect to the International Opportunities Bond Fund. The Fund For Income and International Opportunities Bond Fund are collectively referred to as the “Sub-Advised Funds.”
In reaching its decisions to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds, the Board considered information furnished and discussed throughout the year at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings as well as information provided specifically in relation to the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements for the April Meeting and May Meeting. Information furnished at Board and/or Committee meetings throughout the year included FIMCO’s analysis of each Fund’s investment performance and the performance of the sub-advisers to the respective Sub-Advised Funds, presentations given by representatives of FIMCO, Muzinich and Brandywine and various reports on compliance and other services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates. In preparation for the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, the Independent Trustees requested and received information compiled by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, that included, among other things: (1) the investment performance over various time periods and the fees and expenses of each Fund as compared to a comparable group of funds as determined by Lipper (“Peer Group”); and (2) comparative information on each Fund’s volatility versus total return. Additionally, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/ or May Meeting, FIMCO furnished, and the Board considered, information concerning various aspects of its operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates to the Funds, including investment advisory and administrative services to the Funds including, as applicable, services in connection with selecting, overseeing and evaluating the sub-advisers; (2) the actual management fees paid by each Fund to FIMCO; (3) the costs of providing services to each Fund and the profitability of FIMCO and its affiliate, Administrative Data Management Corp. (“ADM”), the Funds’ affiliated transfer agent, from the relationship with each Fund; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to FIMCO or its affiliates as a result of the relationship with each Fund. FIMCO also provided, and the Board considered, an analysis of the overall profitability of the First Investors
271 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
mutual fund business that included various entities affiliated with FIMCO as well as comparative profitability information based on analysis performed by FIMCO of the financial statements of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers. The Board also considered FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s personnel and methods, including the education, experience of key personnel, and the number of their advisory and analytical personnel; general information about the compensation of FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s advisory personnel; FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s investment management process; FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s compliance program; the time and attention of FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s personnel devoted to the management of the Funds; and litigation pending, threatened or settled involving FIMCO and each sub-adviser, and any ongoing or completed audits, investigations or examinations by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Board also considered information provided by FIMCO on management’s initiatives for increasing Fund assets and new product development, enhanced sales and marketing efforts and continuing efforts wherever possible to reduce expenses and improve performance of the Funds. In addition to evaluating, among other things, the written information provided by FIMCO, the Board also evaluated the answers to questions posed by the Board to representatives of FIMCO.
In addition, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, Muzinich and Brandywine furnished, and the Board reviewed, information concerning various aspects of their respective operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by Muzinich and Brandywine to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (2) the sub-advisory fee rates charged by Muzinich and Brandywine and a comparison of those fee rates to the fee rates of Muzinich and Brandywine for providing advisory services to other investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable, with an investment mandate similar to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (3) profitability and/or financial information provided by Muzinich and Brandywine; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to Muzinich and Brandywine as a result of the relationship with each applicable Sub-Advised Fund.
In considering the information and materials described above, the Independent Trustees took into account management style, investment strategies and prevailing market conditions. Moreover, the Independent Trustees received assistance from and met separately with Independent Legal Counsel during both the April Meeting and May Meeting and were provided with a written description of their statutory responsibilities and the legal standards that are applicable to approvals of advisory agreements (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable). Although the Advisory Agreement for all of the Funds and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds
272 |
were considered at the same Board meeting, the Independent Trustees addressed each Fund separately during the April Meeting and May Meeting.
Based on all of the information presented, the Board, including a majority of its Independent Trustees, determined on a Fund-by-Fund basis that the fees charged under the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement are reasonable in relation to the services that are provided under each Agreement. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance in reaching its conclusions and determinations with respect to the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreements. Although not meant to be all-inclusive, the following describes some of the factors that were considered by the Board in deciding to approve the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreements with Muzinich and Brandywine.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In examining the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by FIMCO, the Board recognized that FIMCO is dedicated to providing investment management services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex and that, unlike many other mutual fund managers, FIMCO is not in the business of providing management services to hedge funds, pension funds or private accounts. In this connection, the Board was advised that certain key FIMCO personnel provide separately managed account services to a FIMCO-affiliated investment adviser, but that these personnel spend most of their time serving their FIMCO clients. As a result, the Board considered that FIMCO’s personnel devote substantially all of their time to serving the funds in the First Investors fund complex. The Board also considered management’s explanation regarding the significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders, which are primarily shareholders in the broad middle market.
The Board noted that FIMCO has undertaken extensive responsibilities as manager of the Funds, including: (1) the provision of investment advice to the Funds; (2) implementing policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with each Fund’s investment objectives and policies; (3) the review of brokerage arrangements; (4) oversight of general portfolio compliance with applicable laws; (5) the provision of certain administrative services to the Funds, including fund accounting; (6) the implementation of Board directives as they relate to the Funds; and (7) evaluating and monitoring any sub-advisers on an ongoing basis, including, but not limited to, monitoring each sub-adviser’s investment performance, evaluating each sub-adviser’s compliance program on an annual basis and monitoring investments for compliance purposes, including monitoring each sub-adviser’s soft dollar practices, portfolio
273 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
allocation and best execution. The Board noted that FIMCO provides not only advisory services, but historically also has provided certain administrative personnel and services that many other advisers do not provide without imposition of separate fees. The Board also noted the steps that FIMCO has taken to encourage strong performance, including providing significant incentives to portfolio managers and analysts based on Fund performance. In addition, the Board considered information regarding the overall financial strength of FIMCO and its affiliates and the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided to the Funds.
The Board also considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by FIMCO’s affiliates, including transfer agency and distribution services. The Board took into account the fact that ADM is dedicated to providing transfer agency services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex. As a result, ADM can tailor its processes and services to satisfy the needs of the Funds’ shareholder base. The Board noted that the Funds’ shares are distributed primarily through First Investors Corporation (“FIC”), which is an affiliate of FIMCO.
Furthermore, the Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the investment management services provided by Muzinich and Brandywine to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Board considered Muzinich’s and Brandywine’s investment management process in managing the applicable Sub-Advised Funds and the experience and capability of its personnel responsible for the portfolio management of the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Board also considered information regarding the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided by each sub-adviser. Additionally, with respect to the Sub-Advised Funds, the Board considered the differences in fees paid by each applicable Fund to FIMCO and the fees paid by FIMCO to each sub-advisor, as well as representations by FIMCO that these fee differentials are warranted by its ongoing services and assumption of risks.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to each Fund by FIMCO and the applicable Sub-Advised Funds by Muzinich and Brandywine were appropriate and consistent with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements, as applicable, and supported approval of the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
Investment Performance
The Board placed significant emphasis on the investment performance of each of the Funds. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions held at prior Board or Committee meetings, as applicable, particular attention was given to
274 |
the performance information compiled by Lipper. In particular, the Board reviewed the total return of each Fund over the most recent calendar year (“1-year period”) and the annualized total return over the most recent three calendar year period (“3-year period”) and five calendar year period (“5-year period”). In addition, the Board considered the total return information provided by FIMCO for each Fund through April 30, 2014. The Board also reviewed the annual yield of each Fund for each of the past five calendar years. With regard to the total return and yield information, the Board considered the total return and yield of each Fund on a percentile and quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group. For purposes of the data provided, the first quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the highest performance or yield, as applicable, and the fifth quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the lowest performance or yield.
On a Fund-by-Fund basis, the total return performance reports indicated, and the Board noted, that each Fund except the Strategic Income Fund, which had not yet completed a full year of operating history, fell within one of the top three quintiles for at least one of the total return performance periods provided by Lipper. In particular, with regard to the Fund For Income, the Board noted that the Fund fell within the third quintile for the 1-year period and 3-year period, although the longer term total return was outside of the top three quintiles. With regard to the Investment Grade Fund, the Board noted that the Fund fell within the third quintile for the 3-year period and 5-year period although shorter term total return was outside of the top three quintiles. With regard to the Government Fund, the Board noted that the Fund fell within the first quintile for the 1-year period and second quintile for the 5-year period although total return for the 3-year period was outside of the top three quintiles. With regard to the International Opportunities Bond Fund, the Board noted that the Fund fell within the third quintile for the 1-year period, which was the only total return information available from Lipper due to the short operating history of the Fund. With regard to the Cash Management Fund, the Board noted that the Fund fell within the third quintile for the 5-year period although total return for the other periods was outside of the top three quintiles. The Trustees also considered that, in the current market and interest-rate environment, comparative information regarding performance and fees of money market funds such as the Cash Management Fund is of relatively limited utility. Finally, with regard to the Strategic Income Fund, the Board noted that the Fund had not yet completed a full year of operations for purposes of the Lipper reports.
The Board also reviewed the yields of the Funds and noted that the yield for: (i) the Fund For Income fell within one of the top three quintiles for two of the past five calendar years; (ii) the Investment Grade Fund and Government Fund fell within one
275 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
of the top three quintiles for each of the past five calendar years; (iii) the International Opportunities Bond Fund fell within the top quintile for the past calendar year, which was the only information available due to its short operating history; and (iv) the Cash Management Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for one of the past five calendar years. There was no yield information available for the Strategic Income Fund due to its short operating history. Moreover, the Board considered the volatility versus total return data provided by Lipper as well as FIMCO’s representation that it believes that the Funds use a more conservative investment style than many of their peers.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the investment performance of each Fund was either (a) acceptable or better, or (b) subject to reasonable steps to monitor or address underperformance.
Fund Expenses, Costs of Services, Economies of Scale and Related Benefits
Management Fees and Expenses. The Board also gave substantial consideration to the fees payable under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement as well as under the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds.
The Board reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s contractual management fee rate (at common asset levels) and actual management fee rate (which included the effect of any fee waivers) as a percentage of average net assets to other funds in its Peer Group. In this regard, the Board considered the contractual and actual management fees of each Fund on a quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group and noted the relative position of each Fund within the Peer Group. The Board also considered that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but also certain administrative personnel to the Funds under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement and that many other advisers do not provide such administrative personnel under their advisory agreements and that FIMCO also provides certain administrative services without the imposition of a separate fee. The Board considered that FIMCO informed the Board that it intends to: (i) extend, on a voluntary basis, the existing total expense cap limitation for the Cash Management Fund until May 31, 2015; and (ii) extend, on a voluntary basis, the existing management fee caps for the Fund For Income, Government Fund and Investment Grade Fund until May 31, 2015. The Board also noted that it had previously approved the continuation of the total expense caps on the International Opportunities Bond Fund and Strategic Income Fund until January 31, 2015. The Board also considered that, with respect to the Cash Management Fund, FIMCO was waiving 100% of its management fees and reimbursing a portion of other expenses to avoid a negative return for shareholders due to the extraordinarily low interest rate environment. In particular, the Board noted that: (i) the contractual and
276 |
actual management fees for the Fund For Income, Investment Grade Fund, Government Fund and International Opportunities Bond Fund were outside of the top three quintiles of their respective Peer Groups; (ii) the Strategic Income Fund’s contractual and actual management fees were in the first quintile of its Peer Group; and (iii) the Cash Management Fund’s contractual management fee was in the fourth quintile and actual management fee was in the first quintile of its Peer Group.
The Board also reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s Class A share total expense ratio, taking into account FIMCO’s expense waivers (as applicable), and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees (i.e., fees other than management, transfer agency and 12b-1/non-12b-1 fees) to other funds in its Peer Group, including on a quintile basis. In particular, the Board noted that (i) the total expense ratio for each Fund except the Cash Management Fund was not in the top three quintiles of their respective Peer Groups; and (ii) the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees was in the top three quintiles for all of the Funds except the Fund For Income, Investment Grade Fund and Government Fund.
In considering the level of the total expense ratio and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees, the Board took into account management’s explanation that: (i) the average account size of many of the First Investors funds is small by comparison to the industry average account size and that funds with small average account sizes generally have higher expenses ratios than funds with larger average account sizes; (ii) there are significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders; (iii) overall Fund expenses cover certain check-writing and wiring privileges for Cash Management Fund shareholders at no additional cost; and (iv) Lipper expense comparisons do not take into account the size of a fund complex, and as a result, in most cases the First Investors funds are compared to funds in complexes that are much larger than First Investors. The Board also noted that Lipper’s customized expense groups tend to be fairly small in number and the funds included in the Peer Group generally change from year to year, thereby introducing an element of randomness that affects comparative results each year. While recognizing the limitations inherent in Lipper’s methodology, the Board believed that the data provided by Lipper was a generally appropriate measure of comparative expenses.
In considering the sub-advisory fee rates charged by and costs and profitability of Muzinich and Brandywine with regard to the respective Sub-Advised Funds, the Board noted that FIMCO pays Muzinich or Brandywine, as the case may be, a sub-advisory fee from its own advisory fee rather than each Fund paying Muzinich or Brandywine a fee directly. Muzinich and Brandywine provided, and the Board
277 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
reviewed, information comparing the fees charged by Muzinich and Brandywine for services to the respective Sub-Advised Funds versus the fee rates of Muzinich and Brandywine for providing advisory services to other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable. Based on a review of this information, the Board noted that the fees charged by Muzinich and Brandywine, as the case may be, for services to each applicable Sub-Advised Fund appeared competitive to the fees Muzinich and Brandywine charge to their other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable.
The foregoing comparisons assisted the Trustees by providing them with a basis for evaluating each Fund’s management fee and expense ratio on a relative basis and the Board concluded that each Fund’s management fees appeared reasonable in relation to the services and benefits provided to each Fund.
Profitability. The Board reviewed the materials it received from FIMCO regarding its revenues and costs in providing investment management and certain administrative services to the Funds. In particular, the Board considered the analysis of FIMCO’s profitability with respect to each Fund, calculated for the year ended December 31, 2013, as well as overall profitability information relating to the past five calendar years. The Board also considered the information provided by FIMCO comparing the profitability of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers as analyzed by FIMCO based on publicly available financial statements and noted FIMCO’s analysis that its profit margin is significantly lower than such publicly-traded managers. In reviewing the profitability information, the Board also considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO and its affiliates as a result of their relationship with the Funds, which are discussed below. Based on the information provided, the Board also noted that FIMCO operates the Cash Management Fund at a loss. The Board acknowledged that, as a business matter, FIMCO was entitled to earn reasonable profits for its services to the Funds and concluded that the level of profitability to FIMCO of its contractual arrangements with each Fund did not appear so high as to call into question the appropriateness of the fees paid to FIMCO by any Fund or otherwise to preclude the proposed continuation of the Advisory Agreement for any of the Funds. The Board also considered the profitability and/or financial information provided by Muzinich and Brandywine.
Economies of Scale. With respect to whether economies of scale are realized by FIMCO and the extent to which any economies of scale are reflected in the level of management fee rates charged, the Board considered that the Advisory Agreement fee schedule for each Fund, except the Strategic Income Fund and Cash Management Fund, includes breakpoints to account for management economies of scale as each
278 |
Fund’s assets increase. With respect to the Strategic Income Fund and Cash Management Fund, the Board concluded that the fee structure is appropriate at current asset levels.
“Fall Out” or Ancillary Benefits. The Board considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO, Muzinich and Brandywine as a result of their relationship with the Funds. In that regard, the Board considered the fact that FIMCO and Brandywine may receive research from broker-dealers that execute brokerage transactions for the funds in the First Investors fund complex. However, the Board noted that FIMCO and Brandywine must select brokers based on each Fund’s requirements for seeking best execution. The Board considered the fact that Muzinich does not engage in any soft dollar arrangements. The Board also considered the profits earned or losses incurred by ADM and the income received by FIC as a result of FIMCO’s management of the First Investors funds.
* * * |
In summary, based on all relevant information and factors, none of which was individually determinative of the outcome, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
279 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Annual Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements with Wellington Management Company, LLP, Smith Group Asset Management, LP and Vontobel Asset Management, Inc.
The First Investors Equity Funds’ (the “Trust”) investment advisory agreements with the Trust’s investment adviser and, as applicable, sub-advisers, on behalf of each of the Trust’s funds, can remain in effect after an initial term of no greater than two years only if they are renewed at least annually thereafter (i) by the vote of the Trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of each fund and (ii) by the vote of a majority of the Trustees who are not parties to the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) or “interested persons” of any party thereto (the “Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called specifically for the purpose of voting on such approval.
The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) has four regularly scheduled and two informal meetings each year and takes into account throughout the year matters bearing on the approval of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable). The Board and its standing committees also consider at each meeting factors that are relevant to the annual renewal of each fund’s advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable), including the services and support provided to each fund and its shareholders.
On April 17, 2014 (the “April Meeting”), the Independent Trustees met in person with First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”), the Trust’s investment adviser, Trust counsel, independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees (“Independent Legal Counsel”) and others to give preliminary consideration to information bearing on the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) with respect to each fund. The primary purpose of the April Meeting was to ensure that the Independent Trustees had ample opportunity to consider matters they deemed relevant in considering the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable), and to request any additional information they considered reasonably necessary to their deliberations. The Independent Trustees also met in executive session with Independent Legal Counsel to consider the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) outside the presence of management. As part of the April Meeting, the Independent Trustees asked FIMCO to respond to certain additional questions prior to the contract approval meeting of the Board to be held on May 15, 2014 (the “May Meeting”).
At the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory
280 |
Agreement”) between FIMCO and each of the following funds (each a “Fund” and collectively the “Funds”): Growth & Income Fund, Opportunity Fund, Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund, Special Situations Fund, Select Growth Fund, Global Fund and International Fund. In addition, at the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the sub-advisory agreements (each a “Sub-Advisory Agreement” and collectively the “Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with: (1) Wellington Management Company, LLP (“WMC”) with respect to the Global Fund; (2) Smith Group Asset Management, LP (“Smith Group”) with respect to the Select Growth Fund; and (3) Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. (“Vontobel”) with respect to the International Fund. The Global Fund, Select Growth Fund and International Fund are collectively referred to as the “Sub-Advised Funds.”
In reaching its decisions to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds, the Board considered information furnished and discussed throughout the year at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings as well as information provided specifically in relation to the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements for the April Meeting and May Meeting. Information furnished at Board and/or Committee meetings throughout the year included FIMCO’s analysis of each Fund’s investment performance and the performance of the sub-advisers to the respective Sub-Advised Funds, presentations given by representatives of FIMCO, WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel and various reports on compliance and other services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates. In preparation for the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, the Independent Trustees requested and received information compiled by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, that included, among other things: (1) the investment performance over various time periods and the fees and expenses of each Fund as compared to a comparable group of funds as determined by Lipper (“Peer Group”); and (2) comparative information on each Fund’s volatility versus total return. Additionally, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, FIMCO furnished, and the Board considered, information concerning various aspects of its operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates to the Funds, including investment advisory and administrative services to the Funds including, as applicable, services in connection with selecting, overseeing and evaluating the sub-advisers; (2) the actual management fees paid by each Fund to FIMCO; (3) the costs of providing services to each Fund and the profitability of FIMCO and its affiliate, Administrative Data Management Corp. (“ADM”), the Funds’ affiliated transfer agent, from the relationship with each Fund; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to FIMCO or its affiliates as a result of the relationship with each Fund. FIMCO also provided,
281 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
and the Board considered, an analysis of the overall profitability of the First Investors mutual fund business that included various entities affiliated with FIMCO as well as comparative profitability information based on analysis performed by FIMCO of the financial statements of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers. The Board also considered FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s personnel and methods, including the education, experience of key personnel, and the number of their advisory and analytical personnel; general information about the compensation of FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s advisory personnel; FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s investment management process; FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s compliance program; the time and attention of FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s personnel devoted to the management of the Funds; and litigation pending, threatened or settled involving FIMCO and each sub-adviser, and any ongoing or completed audits, investigations or examinations by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Board also considered information provided by FIMCO on management’s initiatives for increasing Fund assets and new product development, enhanced sales and marketing efforts and continuing efforts wherever possible to reduce expenses and improve performance of the Funds. In addition to evaluating, among other things, the written information provided by FIMCO, the Board also evaluated the answers to questions posed by the Board to representatives of FIMCO.
In addition, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel furnished, and the Board reviewed, information concerning various aspects of their respective operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (2) the sub-advisory fee rates charged by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel and a comparison of those fee rates to the fee rates of WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel for providing advisory services to other investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable, with an investment mandate similar to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (3) profitability and/or financial information provided by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel as a result of the relationship with each applicable Sub-Advised Fund.
In considering the information and materials described above, the Independent Trustees took into account management style, investment strategies and prevailing market conditions. Moreover, the Independent Trustees received assistance from and met separately with Independent Legal Counsel during both the April Meeting and May Meeting and were provided with a written description of their statutory responsibilities and the legal standards that are applicable to approvals of advisory agreements
282 |
(and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable). Although the Advisory Agreement for all of the Funds and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds were considered at the same Board meeting, the Independent Trustees addressed each Fund separately during the April Meeting and May Meeting.
Based on all of the information presented, the Board, including a majority of its Independent Trustees, determined on a Fund-by-Fund basis that the fees charged under the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement are reasonable in relation to the services that are provided under each Agreement. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance in reaching its conclusions and determinations with respect to the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreements. Although not meant to be all-inclusive, the following describes some of the factors that were considered by the Board in deciding to approve the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreements with WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In examining the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by FIMCO, the Board recognized that FIMCO is dedicated to providing investment management services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex and that, unlike many other mutual fund managers, FIMCO is not in the business of providing management services to hedge funds, pension funds or private accounts. In this connection, the Board was advised that certain key FIMCO personnel provide separately managed account services to a FIMCO-affiliated investment adviser, but that these personnel spend most of their time serving their FIMCO clients. As a result, the Board considered that FIMCO’s personnel devote substantially all of their time to serving the funds in the First Investors fund complex. The Board also considered management’s explanation regarding the significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders, which are primarily shareholders in the broad middle market.
The Board noted that FIMCO has undertaken extensive responsibilities as manager of the Funds, including: (1) the provision of investment advice to the Funds; (2) implementing policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with each Fund’s investment objectives and policies; (3) the review of brokerage arrangements; (4) oversight of general portfolio compliance with applicable laws; (5) the provision of certain administrative services to the Funds, including fund accounting; (6) the implementation of Board directives as they relate to the Funds; and (7) evaluating and monitoring any sub-advisers on an ongoing basis, including, but not limited to, monitoring each sub-adviser’s investment performance, evaluating each sub-adviser’s
283 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
compliance program on an annual basis and monitoring investments for compliance purposes, including monitoring each sub-adviser’s soft dollar practices, portfolio allocation and best execution. The Board noted that FIMCO provides not only advisory services, but historically also has provided certain administrative personnel and services that many other advisers do not provide without imposition of separate fees. The Board also noted the steps that FIMCO has taken to encourage strong performance, including providing significant incentives to portfolio managers and analysts based on Fund performance. In addition, the Board considered information regarding the overall financial strength of FIMCO and its affiliates and the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided to the Funds.
The Board also considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by FIMCO’s affiliates, including transfer agency and distribution services. The Board took into account the fact that ADM is dedicated to providing transfer agency services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex. As a result, ADM can tailor its processes and services to satisfy the needs of the Funds’ shareholder base. The Board noted that the Funds’ shares are distributed primarily through First Investors Corporation (“FIC”), which is an affiliate of FIMCO.
Furthermore, the Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the investment management services provided by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Board considered WMC’s, Smith Group’s and Vontobel’s investment management process in managing the applicable Sub-Advised Funds and the experience and capability of their respective personnel responsible for the portfolio management of the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Board also considered information regarding the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided by each sub-adviser. Additionally, with respect to the Sub-Advised Funds, the Board considered the differences in fees paid by each applicable Fund to FIMCO and the fees paid by FIMCO to each sub-advisor, as well as representations by FIMCO that these fee differentials are warranted by its ongoing services and assumption of risks.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to each Fund by FIMCO and the applicable Sub-Advised Funds by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel were appropriate and consistent with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements, as applicable, and supported approval of the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
284 |
Investment Performance
The Board placed significant emphasis on the investment performance of each of the Funds. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions held at prior Board or Committee meetings, as applicable, particular attention was given to the performance information compiled by Lipper. In particular, the Board reviewed the performance of each Fund over the most recent calendar year (“1-year period”) and the annualized performance over the most recent three calendar year period (“3-year period”) and five calendar year period (“5-year period”). In addition, the Board considered the performance information provided by FIMCO for each Fund through April 30, 2014. With regard to the performance information, the Board considered the performance of each Fund on a percentile and quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group. For purposes of the performance data provided, the first quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the highest performance and the fifth quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the lowest performance.
On a Fund-by-Fund basis, the performance reports indicated, and the Board noted, that each Fund except the Special Situations Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for at least one of the performance periods provided by Lipper. In particular, with regard to the Growth & Income Fund, Opportunity Fund and Total Return Fund, the Board noted that each Fund fell within the top two quintiles for each of the 1-year period, 3-year period and 5-year period. With regard to the Equity Income Fund, the Board noted that FIMCO changed the portfolio manager for the Fund in November 2011 and that the changes implemented by the new portfolio manager have led to performance in the second quintile for the 1-year period, although performance prior to the new portfolio manager taking over was outside of the top three quintiles. The Board also noted that although the Select Growth Fund’s and International Fund’s performance over the 3-year period was in the second quintile, shorter term and longer term performance was not in the top three quintiles. With regard to the Global Fund, the Board noted that both the 1-year period and 5-year period performance fell within the third quintile. With respect to the Special Situations Fund, the Board noted that the Fund’s performance was not in the top three quintiles for any of the periods provided by Lipper. However, the Board considered that FIMCO had recommended, and the Board had approved, the termination of the Special Situations Fund’s sub-adviser in September 2013 and that the Fund’s performance had appeared to improve since FIMCO began managing the Fund internally rather than using a sub-adviser. The Board also considered the volatility versus total return data provided by Lipper as well as FIMCO’s representation that it believes that the Funds use a more conservative investment style than many of their peers.
285 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the investment performance of each Fund was either (a) acceptable or better, or (b) subject to reasonable steps to monitor or address underperformance.
Fund Expenses, Costs of Services, Economies of Scale and Related Benefits
Management Fees and Expenses. The Board also gave substantial consideration to the fees payable under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement as well as under the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds.
The Board reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s contractual management fee rate (at common asset levels) and actual management fee rate (which included the effect of any fee waivers) as a percentage of average net assets to other funds in its Peer Group. In this regard, the Board considered the contractual and actual management fees of each Fund on a quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group and noted the relative position of each Fund within the Peer Group. The Board also considered that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but also certain administrative personnel to the Funds under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement and that many other advisers do not provide such administrative personnel under their advisory agreements and that FIMCO also provides certain administrative services without the imposition of a separate fee. The Board also considered that FIMCO informed the Board that it intends to extend, on a voluntary basis, the existing management fee cap for the Special Situations Fund and Global Fund until May 31, 2015. The Board also noted that in response to its request, FIMCO agreed to lower the contractual management fees for the Special Situations Fund at its first breakpoint by 10 basis points. In particular, the Board noted that: (i) the contractual and actual management fees for all of the Funds except the Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund and Global Fund were in the top three quintiles of their respective Peer Groups; (ii) the Total Return Fund’s and Global Fund’s contractual and actual management fees were in the fourth quintile of their respective Peer Groups; and (iii) the Equity Income Fund’s contractual management fee was in the third quintile and actual management fee was in the fourth quintile of its Peer Group.
The Board also reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s Class A share total expense ratio, taking into account FIMCO’s expense waivers (as applicable), and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees (i.e., fees other than management, transfer agency and 12b-1/ non-12b-1 fees) to other funds in its Peer Group, including on a quintile basis. In particular, the Board noted that: (i) the total expense ratio for each Fund except the Special Situations Fund was not in the top three quintiles of their respective Peer Groups; and (ii) the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees
286 |
was in the top three quintiles for all of the Funds except the Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund, Global Fund and International Fund. In considering the level of the total expense ratio and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees, the Board took into account management’s explanation that: (i) the Funds have average account sizes that are relatively small compared with the industry average and that funds with small average account sizes generally have higher expense ratios than funds with larger average account sizes; (ii) there are significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders; and (iii) Lipper expense comparisons do not take into account the size of a fund complex, and as a result, in certain cases the First Investors funds are compared to funds in complexes that are much larger than First Investors. The Board also noted that Lipper’s customized expense groups tend to be fairly small in number and the funds included in the Peer Group generally change from year to year, thereby introducing an element of randomness that affects comparative results each year. While recognizing the limitations inherent in Lipper’s methodology, the Board believed that the data provided by Lipper was a generally appropriate measure of comparative expenses.
In considering the sub-advisory fee rates charged by and costs and profitability of WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel with regard to the respective Sub-Advised Funds, the Board noted that FIMCO pays WMC, Smith Group or Vontobel, as the case may be, a sub-advisory fee from its own advisory fee rather than each Fund paying WMC, Smith Group or Vontobel a fee directly. WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel provided, and the Board reviewed, information comparing the fees charged by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel for services to the respective Sub-Advised Funds versus the fee rates of WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel for providing advisory services to other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable. Based on a review of this information, the Board noted that the fees charged by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel, as the case may be, for services to each applicable Sub-Advised Fund appeared competitive to the fees WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel charge to their other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable.
The foregoing comparisons assisted the Trustees by providing them with a basis for evaluating each Fund’s management fee and expense ratio on a relative basis and the Board concluded that each Fund’s management fees appeared reasonable in relation to the services and benefits provided to each Fund.
Profitability. The Board reviewed the materials it received from FIMCO regarding its revenues and costs in providing investment management and certain administrative services to the Funds. In particular, the Board considered the analysis of FIMCO’s
287 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
profitability with respect to each Fund, calculated for the year ended December 31, 2013, as well as overall profitability information relating to the past five calendar years. The Board also considered the information provided by FIMCO comparing the profitability of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers as analyzed by FIMCO based on publicly available financial statements and noted FIMCO’s analysis that its profit margin is significantly lower than such publicly-traded managers. In reviewing the profitability information, the Board also considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO and its affiliates as a result of their relationship with the Funds, which are discussed below. The Board acknowledged that, as a business matter, FIMCO was entitled to earn reasonable profits for its services to the Funds and concluded that the level of profitability to FIMCO of its contractual arrangements with each Fund did not appear so high as to call into question the appropriateness of the fees paid to FIMCO by any Fund or otherwise to preclude the proposed continuation of the Advisory Agreement for any of the Funds. The Board also considered the profitability and/or financial information provided by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel.
Economies of Scale. With respect to whether economies of scale are realized by FIMCO and the extent to which any economies of scale are reflected in the level of management fee rates charged, the Board considered that the Advisory Agreement fee schedule for each Fund includes breakpoints to account for management economies of scale as each Fund’s assets increase.
“Fall Out” or Ancillary Benefits. The Board considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO, WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel as a result of their relationship with the Funds. In that regard, the Board considered the fact that FIMCO, WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel may receive research from broker-dealers that execute brokerage transactions for the funds in the First Investors fund complex. However, the Board noted that FIMCO and the sub-advisers must select brokers based on each Fund’s requirements for seeking best execution. The Board also considered the profits earned or losses incurred by ADM and the income received by FIC as a result of FIMCO’s management of the First Investors funds.
* * * |
In summary, based on all relevant information and factors, none of which was individually determinative of the outcome, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
288 |
This page left intentionally blank. |
289 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Trustees and Officers*
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
DISINTERESTED TRUSTEES | ||||
Susan E. Artmann (1954) | Trustee | Since 11/1/12 | 43 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Retired. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HSBC Insurance North America (since 2012); | ||||
Executive Vice President and President (2008-2011) and Chief Financial Officer (2000-2008) of HSBC Taxpayer | ||||
Financial Services. | ||||
Mary J. Barneby (1952) | Trustee | Since 11/1/12 | 43 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Executive Officer, Girl Scouts of Connecticut (since October 2012); Executive Director of UBS Financial | ||||
Services, Inc. and Head of Stamford Private Wealth Office (2002-2012). | ||||
Charles R. Barton, III (1965) | Trustee | Since 1/1/06 | 43 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Operating Officer (since 2007), Board Director (since 1989, currently Ex-Officio) and Trustee (since 1994) | ||||
of The Barton Group/Barton Mines Corporation (mining and industrial abrasives distribution); President of Noe | ||||
Pierson Corporation (land holding and management services provider) (since 2004). |
290 |
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position(s) | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
DISINTERESTED TRUSTEES (continued) | ||||
Arthur M. Scutro, Jr. (1941) | Trustee and | Trustee since | 43 | None |
c/o First Investors | Chairman | 1/1/06 and | ||
Legal Department | Chairman | |||
40 Wall Street | since 1/1/13 | |||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
None/Retired | ||||
Mark R. Ward (1952) | Trustee | Since 1/1/10 | 43 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Self-employed, consultant (since 2008) |
*Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term with the Funds, until his/her successor is elected.
291 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Trustees and Officers* (continued)
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
OFFICER(S) WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES | ||||
William Lipkus* (1964) | President | Since | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors | June 27, 2014 | |||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (since 2012), Treasurer (1999-2013), Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(1997-2013) and Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) of First Investors Consolidated Corporation; Director | ||||
(since 2007), Chairman (since 2012), Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(1998-2013) of First Investors Management Company, Inc.; Director (since 2011), Chairman (since 2012), Chief | ||||
Financial Officer (1998-2013), Treasurer (1999-2013), and Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) of First | ||||
Investors Corporation; Chairman (since 2012), Director (since 2007), Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014), | ||||
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (1998-2013) of Administrative Data Management Corp.; Director and | ||||
Chairman (since 2012), Vice President (1996-2014), Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (1996-2013) and | ||||
Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) of First Investors Life Insurance Company; and Board of Managers and | ||||
Chairman (since 2012) and Chief Financial Officer (2012-2013) of First Investors Advisory Services, LLC. | ||||
Joseph I. Benedek (1957) | Treasurer | Since 1988 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors Management | ||||
Company, Inc. | ||||
Raritan Plaza I | ||||
Edison, NJ 08837 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Treasurer of First Investors Management Company, Inc. | ||||
Mary Carty (1950) | Secretary | Since 2010 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
General Counsel of First Investors Management Company, Inc. and various affiliated companies since December 2012; | ||||
Assistant Counsel of First Investors Management Company, Inc., (2010-2012). Special Counsel and Associate at | ||||
Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP (1998-2009). |
292 |
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
OFFICER(S) WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES (continued) | ||||
Marc S. Milgram (1957) | Chief | Since 2010 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors | Compliance | |||
Legal Department | Officer | |||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Investment Compliance Manager of First Investors Management Company, Inc., (2009-2010); First Investors | ||||
Federal Savings Bank, President (2000-2011), Treasurer (1987-2011) and Director (2004-2011); First Investors | ||||
Corporation, Vice President (2008-2009); Administrative Data Management Corp., Vice President (2008-2009); | ||||
and First Investors Name Saver, Inc. f/k/a/ School Financial Management Services, Inc., Treasurer since 1992 | ||||
and Director (1992-2007). |
*Effective June 27, 2014, Mr. William Lipkus became President of the Funds. Mr. Derek Burke resigned as President effective June 27, 2014.
293 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Shareholder Information | ||
Investment Adviser | Underwriter | |
First Investors Management | First Investors Corporation | |
Company, Inc. | 40 Wall Street | |
40 Wall Street | New York, NY 10005 | |
New York, NY 10005 | ||
Custodian | ||
Subadviser | (Income Funds except Strategic Income | |
(International Opportunities Bond Fund) | Fund and International Opportunities | |
Brandywine Global Investment | Bond Fund) | |
Management, LLC | The Bank of New York Mellon | |
2929 Arch Street | One Wall Street | |
Philadelphia, PA 19104 | New York, NY 10286 | |
Subadviser | Custodian | |
(Floating Rate Fund and Fund For Income) | (Strategic Income Fund, International | |
Muzinich & Co., Inc. | Opportunities Bond Fund and the | |
450 Park Avenue | Equity Funds) | |
New York, NY 10022 | Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. | |
50 Post Office Square | ||
Subadviser | Boston, MA 02110 | |
(Global Fund) | ||
Wellington Management Company, LLP | Transfer Agent | |
280 Congress Street | Administrative Data Management Corp. | |
Boston, MA 02210 | Raritan Plaza I – 8th Floor | |
Edison, NJ 08837-3620 | ||
Subadviser | ||
(Select Growth Fund) | Independent Registered Public | |
Smith Asset Management Group, L.P. | Accounting Firm | |
100 Crescent Court | Tait, Weller & Baker LLP | |
Dallas, TX 75201 | 1818 Market Street | |
Philadelphia, PA 19103 | ||
Subadviser | ||
(International Fund) | Legal Counsel | |
Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. | K&L Gates LLP | |
1540 Broadway | 1601 K Street, N.W. | |
New York, NY 10036 | Washington, D.C. 20006 |
294 |
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to vote proxies relating to a portfolio’s securities is available, without charge, upon request by calling toll free 1-800-423-4026 or can be viewed online or downloaded from the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) internet website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available, without charge, upon request in writing or by calling 1-800-423-4026 and on the SEC’s internet website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Funds file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC on Form N-Q for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Funds’ Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; and may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The schedule of portfolio holdings is available, without charge, upon request in writing or by calling 1-800-423-4026.
295 |
NOTES
296 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics
As of September 30, 2014, the Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer. On July 22, 2014 revisions were made to the code of ethics to reflect the appointment of a new President of the First Investors Funds.
For the year ended September 30, 2014, there were no waivers granted from a provision of the code of ethics.
A copy of the Registrant's code of ethics is filed under Item 12(a)(1).
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
During the reporting period the Registrant's Board determined that it had at least one "audit committee financial expert" serving on its audit committee. Arthur M. Scutro, Jr. and Mark R. Ward were the "audit committee financial experts" during all or part of the period and were considered to be "independent" as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
----------------- | ||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||
---- | ---- | |||||||
(a) | Audit Fees | |||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ | 196,450 | $ | 145,700 | ||||
(b) | Audit-Related Fees | |||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||
(c) | Tax Fees | |||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ | 37,500 | $ | 26,000 | ||||
Nature of services: tax returns preparation and tax compliance | ||||||||
(d) | All Other Fees | |||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
(e)(1) Audit committee's pre-approval policies
The Charter of the Audit Committee requires the Audit Committee (a) to pre-approve, and to recommend to the full Board, the selection, retention or termination of the independent auditors to
provide audit, review or attest services to the First Investors Funds (“Funds”) and, in connection therewith, evaluate the independence of the auditors and to obtain the auditors’ specific representations as to their independence; (b) to pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided to the Funds by the independent auditor; and (c) to pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided by the Funds’ independent auditor to the Funds’ investment adviser or to any entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Funds’ investment adviser and that provides ongoing services to the Funds, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds. The Audit Committee has not adopted pre-approval policies or procedures to permit the services in (b) and (c) above to be pre-approved by other means.
(e)(2) None, or 0%, of the services relating to the Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees paid by the Registrant and Related Entities disclosed above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (which permits audit committee approval after the start of the engagement with respect to services other than audit review or attest services, if certain conditions are satisfied).
(f) Not Applicable
(g) Aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Registrant's accountant for services rendered to the Registrant and the Registrant's investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant for the two fiscal years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were $170,500 and $121,200, respectively.
(h) Not Applicable
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Schedule is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies & Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers
Not applicable
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There were no material changes to the procedure by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant's Board of Trustees.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Registrant's President and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effective, based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) There were no changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
(a)(1) Code of Ethics - Filed herewith
(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Filed herewith
(b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Filed herewith
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
First Investors Income Funds
By | /S/ WILLIAM LIPKUS |
William Lipkus | |
President and Principal Executive Officer | |
Date: | November 26, 2014 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /S/ WILLIAM LIPKUS |
William Lipkus | |
President and Principal Executive Officer | |
By | /S/ JOSEPH I. BENEDEK |
Joseph I. Benedek | |
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | |
Date: | November 26, 2014 |