UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 |
-------- |
FORM N-CSR |
-------- |
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT FILE NUMBER 811-3967 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
40 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Joseph I. Benedek
Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
Raritan Plaza I
Edison, NJ 08837-3620
(Name and address of agent for service)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE:
1-212-858-8000
DATE OF FISCAL YEAR END: SEPTEMBER 30
DATE OF REPORTING PERIOD: SEPTEMBER 30, 2016
Item 1. | Reports to Stockholders |
The annual report to stockholders follows |
FOREWORD |
This report is for the information of the shareholders of the Funds. It is the policy of each Fund described in this report to mail only one copy of a Fund’s prospectus, annual report, semi-annual report and proxy statements to all shareholders who share the same mailing address and share the same last name and have invested in a Fund covered by the same document. You are deemed to consent to this policy unless you specifically revoke this policy and request that separate copies of such documents be mailed to you. In such case, you will begin to receive your own copies within 30 days after our receipt of the revocation. You may request that separate copies of these disclosure documents be mailed to you by writing to us at: Foresters Investor Services, Inc., Raritan Plaza I, Edison, NJ 08837-3620 or calling us at 1-800-423-4026.
The views expressed in the portfolio manager letters reflect those views of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period covered. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and we disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice.
You may obtain a free prospectus for any of the Funds by contacting your representative, calling 1-800-423-4026, writing to us at the following address: Foresters Financial Services, Inc., 40 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005, or by visiting our website at www.foresters.com. You should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a Fund carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund, and should be read carefully before investing.
An investment in a Fund is not a bank deposit and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency. Although the Cash Management Fund* seeks to preserve a net asset value at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in it, just as it is possible to lose money by investing in any of the other Funds. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
A Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) for any of the Funds may also be obtained, without charge, upon request by calling 1-800-423-4026, writing to us at our address or by visiting our website listed above. The SAI contains more detailed information about the Funds, including information about its Trustees.
* Effective October 3, 2016, the Cash Management Fund changed its name to the Government Cash Management Fund.
Foresters FinancialTM and ForestersTM are the trade names and trademarks of The Independent Order of Foresters (Foresters), a fraternal benefit society, 789 Don Mills Road, Toronto, Canada M3C 1T9 and its subsidiaries.
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND*
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Cash Management Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 0.00% for Class A shares, 0.00% for Class B shares and 0.00% for Institutional Class shares. The Fund maintained a $1.00 net asset value per share for each class of shares throughout the year.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell-off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4%, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international bonds fell into negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
The Fund
Short-term interest rates edged modestly higher over the last year after the Fed raised its target federal funds rate by 25 basis points (.25%) in December of 2015, the first time in nearly a decade. The market struggled with on and off again expectations of additional increases with nearly every new economic report. Ultimately, persistent low inflation and
1 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND*
slow economic growth despite apparently strong employment gave pause to the Fed and its tightening cycle. The Fed more recently has indicated that a near-term rise in interest rates is likely, while also suggesting that the track to higher short-term rates will be slow, as long as inflation remains subdued and growth below average.
Yields on shorter-maturity money market investments are anchored by the current federal funds target rate which remains very low. Other factors suppressing shorter-term yields are substantial levels of cash in the money market, a general lack of supply and money market regulations that have forced money market mutual fund assets into more defensive and shorter-term investments. Yields on longer-maturity money market instruments reflect, among other things, market expectations related to growth, inflation and the Fed’s policy on short-term interest rates.
The Fund invested conservatively during the period, maintaining a substantial portion of its assets in U.S. Treasury and government agency securities. This was a common theme for the money market mutual fund industry, as pending regulatory changes generated uncertainty and a monumental shift of assets from Prime Money Market Funds to Government Money Market Funds. Low compensation for risk, however, was the significant factor in our decision to overweight these lower-risk products. The Fund also maintained a weighted average maturity of fewer than 60 days during the period in order to comply with Securities and Exchange Commission rules designed to limit interest rate risk.
Foresters Investment Management Company (“FIMCO”) expects the yield to shareholders to be at or near zero for the immediate future based on that outlook. To avoid a negative yield to its shareholders, FIMCO continues to absorb expenses for the Fund and has waived its management fee.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
*In response to amendments to the rules governing money market funds, the Board of Trustees of the First Investors Cash Management Fund approved the conversion of the Fund to a government money market fund, as defined in Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. As a result, effective October 3, 2016, the name of the Fund was changed to First Investors Government Cash Management Fund and the Fund adopted a policy to invest at least 99.5% of its total assets in cash, U.S. government securities and/or repurchase agreements that are collateralized fully by cash or U.S. government securities. The Fund intends to operate as a “government money market fund” as defined in Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
2 |
Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses (unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
As a mutual fund shareholder, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including a sales charge (load) on purchase payments (on Class A shares only) and a contingent deferred sales charge on redemptions (on Class B shares only); and (2) ongoing costs, including advisory fees; distribution and service fees (12b-1) (on Class A and Class B shares only); and other expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 in each Fund at the beginning of the period, April 1, 2016, and held for the entire six-month period ended September 30, 2016. The calculations assume that no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.
Actual Expenses Example:
These amounts help you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from the Fund’s actual return, and the “Expenses Paid During Period” shows the dollar amount that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the Fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.
To estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period, simply divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number given for your Fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period”.
Hypothetical Expenses Example:
These amounts provide information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio for each class of shares of a Fund, and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as front-end or contingent deferred sales charges (loads) or account fees that are charged to certain types of accounts, such as an annual custodial fee of $15 for certain IRA accounts and certain other retirement accounts or an annual custodial fee of $30 for 403(b) custodial accounts (subject to exceptions and certain waivers as described in the Funds’ Statement of Additional Information). Therefore, the hypothetical expenses example is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
3 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 0.40% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $2.00 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,023.00 | $2.02 | |
Class B Shares | 0.40% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $2.00 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,023.00 | $2.02 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.40% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $2.00 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,023.00 | $2.02 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived and/or assumed. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
4 |
Portfolio of Investments
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | Interest | ||||||
Amount | Security | Rate | * | Value | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—63.2% | |||||||
$ 1,700M | Fannie Mae, 12/14/2016 | 0.34 | % | $ 1,698,812 | |||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
5,000M | 10/13/2016 | 0.30 | 4,999,500 | ||||
6,000M | 10/14/2016 | 0.30 | 5,999,361 | ||||
4,000M | 10/21/2016 | 0.37 | 3,999,188 | ||||
5,000M | 10/27/2016 | 0.31 | 4,998,898 | ||||
5,000M | 10/31/2016 | 0.31 | 4,998,708 | ||||
4,750M | 11/18/2016 | 0.37 | 4,747,654 | ||||
6,000M | 11/25/2016 | 0.35 | 5,996,836 | ||||
6,000M | 11/28/2016 | 0.40 | 5,996,179 | ||||
2,500M | 11/30/2016 | 0.34 | 2,498,566 | ||||
2,200M | 12/15/2016 | 0.61 | 2,197,199 | ||||
5,000M | 12/23/2016 | 0.51 | 4,994,136 | ||||
5,000M | 12/28/2016 | 0.31 | 4,996,211 | ||||
4,000M | 1/30/2017 | 0.43 | 3,994,217 | ||||
Freddie Mac: | |||||||
6,917M | 10/6/2016 | 0.30 | 6,916,711 | ||||
6,000M | 11/18/2016 | 0.25 | 5,997,968 | ||||
4,000M | 12/14/2016 | 0.28 | 3,997,673 | ||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $79,027,817) | 79,027,817 | ||||||
VARIABLE AND FLOATING RATE NOTES—28.5% | |||||||
Federal Farm Credit Bank: | |||||||
5,000M | 11/15/2016 | 0.57 | 5,000,191 | ||||
1,030M | 12/19/2016 | 0.52 | 1,029,831 | ||||
5,500M | 4/20/2017 | 0.59 | 5,500,613 | ||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
10,000M | 1/27/2017 | 0.51 | 10,001,361 | ||||
3,500M | 9/5/2017 | 0.56 | 3,502,158 | ||||
5,000M | Mississippi Business Fin. Corp. (Chevron USA, Inc.), | ||||||
12/1/2030 | 0.78 | 5,000,000 | |||||
5,675M | Valdez, AK Marine Term. Rev. (Exxon Pipeline Co., | ||||||
Project B), 12/1/2033 | 0.76 | 5,675,000 | |||||
Total Value of Variable and Floating Rate Notes (cost $35,709,154) | 35,709,154 |
5 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | Interest | ||||||
Amount | Security | Rate | * | Value | |||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—6.8% | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills: | |||||||
$ 4,000M | 10/20/2016 | 0.25 | % | $ 3,999,480 | |||
4,500M | 11/3/2016 | 0.27 | 4,498,907 | ||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Obligations (cost $8,498,387) | 8,498,387 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $123,235,358)** | 98.5 | % | 123,235,358 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.5 | 1,893,965 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $125,129,323 |
* | The interest rates shown are the effective rates at the time of purchase by the Fund. The interest |
rates shown on floating rate notes are adjusted periodically; the rates shown are the rates in effect | |
at September 30, 2016. | |
** | Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is the same. |
6 |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | $ | — | $ | 79,027,817 | $ | — | $ | 79,027,817 | ||||
Variable and Floating Rate Notes: | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 25,034,154 | — | 25,034,154 | ||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 10,675,000 | — | 10,675,000 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 8,498,387 | — | 8,498,387 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 123,235,358 | $ | — | $ | 123,235,358 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 7 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
BALANCED INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Balanced Income Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 8.55% for Class A shares, 8.97% for Advisor Class shares and 9.08% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 15.0 cents per share for Class A shares, 16.1 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 17.2 cents per share for Institutional Class shares. The Fund’s performance this year was driven in substantial part by its policy of allocating its assets among equities, fixed income investments and cash. The Fund typically has a target asset allocation of 55% bonds, 40% equities, and 5% cash.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4 %, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international bonds fell into
8 |
negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
The Equity Market
Overall, U.S. equities (measured by the S&P 500 TR Index) posted a strong return of 15.43% for the 12 months ending September 30th. However, they experienced turbulent swings during this period. U.S. equity markets started the review period on a strong note, rallying 8.44% in October 2015 as they were recovering from the August and September sell-off. This was later followed by double-digit losses, amid worries about China, global growth and falling oil prices. Most of those fears subsided in mid-February as China’s markets stabilized, oil producers talked about decreasing supply, and Janet Yellen implied there would be fewer rate hikes than expected in 2016. Then, markets strongly rebounded from the February 11th bottom and gained almost 17% by the June 23rd Brexit vote. Markets then lost over 5% in the two days following the Brexit vote, followed by another strong rally which lasted until mid-July. Markets then stayed calm for the rest of the summer before volatility returned in September.
Overall, mid-cap stocks (measured by the S&P Midcap 400 Index) and small caps (Russell 2000 Index) posted similar returns to large caps, returning 15.33% and 15.46% for the period. However, they experienced much wider swings within the period, especially small caps. Large caps led the market during the fourth quarter of 2015, while small caps outperformed during the third quarter of 2016.
Higher-yielding stocks, including Utilities and real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), outperformed for most of the review period, supported by the low yielding environment and lack of other higher-yielding options. However, they became expensive and fell out of favor in August and September as economic data hinted that the Fed might increase rates by the end of the year. Overall, the Dow Jones U.S. Select Dividend Index and Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index returned 22.24% and 17.70%, respectively, for the past 12 months. All of the S&P 500 sectors ended the review period in positive territory, ranging from 7.40% (Financials) to 26.82% (Telecom Services).
International equities were positive as well. Developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada (measured by the MSCI EAFE Index) finished the review period up 7.06%. Emerging markets (measured by the MSCI EM Index) outperformed developed markets with a return of 17.21%. This was a result of negative yields on many developed market bonds which increased demand for emerging market assets with positive yields. Emerging markets also benefited from recovering commodity prices.
The Bond Market
All major fixed income markets were positive for the past 12 months ending September 30th. The U.S. bond market (measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index) gained 5.26%.
9 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
BALANCED INCOME FUND
Treasuries (measured by the BofA ML US Treasury Index) returned 4.33% during the review period. They did especially well during the first half of 2016 when they were boosted by declining interest rates and aggressive ECB easing. Longer-dated bonds significantly outperformed with 15+ year Treasuries gaining as much as 13.34% during the review period.
The Treasury yield curve flattened with short-term yields rising and long-term yields declining. The 2-year Treasury yield, which is very sensitive to changes in Fed policy, rose 13 basis points from 0.63% as of 9/30/2015 to 0.76% as of 9/30/2016. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield fell 44 basis points from 2.04% to 1.60%. The route of Treasury yields was very much influenced by the market’s expectations of actions and comments from central banks. Treasury yields reached their highest level of the review period during the end of 2015, when the market was pricing in the possibility that the Fed might raise interest rates four times in 2016. On the other hand, yields bottomed early in July on speculations that soft global growth would encourage major central banks to support economies with stimulus efforts, including continued low interest rates.
The 2-year yield fell to 0.55% while the 10-year yield fell to a new all-time record low of 1.36%. There is an inverse relationship between bond prices and yield changes.
Municipal bonds (measured by the BofA ML Municipal Master Index) returned 5.58%, with the majority of this return happening during the first nine months of the review period. Despite elevated issuance, strong demand from investors looking for yield was a major factor in municipal bond market performance.
Investment grade corporate bonds (measured by the BofA ML Corporate Master Index) posted a strong return of 8.50% for the review period, with the majority of this return occurring between January and August. Low global interest rates and uncertainty caused by the Brexit vote helped this sector perform well as many fixed income investors looked to U.S. markets as a safe haven. In addition, investment grade corporate bonds benefited from the ECB’s corporate bond-buying program, as demand increased for this asset class.
The high yield bond market (measured by the BofA ML HY Cash Pay Constrained Index) showed strong overall performance of 12.80%. Demand for high yield bonds benefited from investors searching for income. This sector also benefited from a rebound in oil prices. The lowest rated high yield bonds (CCC-rated) were the best performers, gaining 18.05%. However, they also experienced the widest swings; they struggled much more during risk-off periods, while significantly outperforming during risk-on periods.
International fixed income posted strong overall returns, supported by falling yields. Non-U.S. sovereign bonds (Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index) were up 12.61%. Emerging markets (BofA ML Global Emerging Markets Sovereign Index) outperformed with a return of 17.50%. At the end of the review period there was about $9.3 trillion negative-yielding government debt instruments in the world, all of them
10 |
outside the United States. This represents 37% of the Bloomberg Global Developed Sovereign Bond Index and 51% of the all non-U.S. sovereign bonds in the Index.
The Fund
During the period under review, the Fund’s results were driven by a generally favorable market backdrop characterized by periods of extreme low volatility, interrupted by several short-lived market drops and bouts of high volatility, like the UK Brexit vote in June, and the Chinese market sell off in January of 2016. While macro trends showed gradual, but uneven, improving economic conditions over the course of the year, potential interest rate actions from the Fed hung over the markets, keeping stock markets fixated. This also had the effect of perpetuating the “yield” trade, where fixed income and equity investors sought out income producing investments, driving up the prices of that market subsector. The rally also took on the “risk on” flavor, as investors enjoyed continued low borrowing costs to indulge in higher risk (beta), lower quality investments, narrowing the field for long-term market participants.
Both absolute and relative performance was positive, reflecting the strength of the Fund’s strategy during the period under review. The Fund emphasizes high dividend yield as the key determinant, and follows a disciplined growth-at-a-reasonable price, catalyst-focused investment process seeking out exceptional long-term total return. As of period end, the Fund’s investments reflected a 3.4% dividend yield, well above the 2% yield of the S&P 500 Index. This strategy benefited the Fund’s returns during the past year. Overall stock selection was strong, with sector allocations also providing some upside. Among key sectors, Consumer Staples represented the bright spot for the Fund contributing most to return. Investments in the Utilities, Healthcare and Telecommunications sectors also contributed. Among the laggards, shares within the Energy, Consumer Discretionary, Materials and Technology sectors hurt performance. Among market capitalization segments, the Fund’s large and mid-cap stocks outperformed the market, while the small-cap segment was in line. The Fund had allocated 69% of its holdings to large-cap stocks, 16% to mid-cap stocks and 15% to small-cap stocks (ranges defined by Lipper) as of September 30, 2016.
The Fund’s equity holdings returned 18.61%, outperforming the 15.43% return of its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. Among top performing individual investments, within Consumer Staples shares of tobacco makers Philip Morris International (+23%) and Altria Group (+16%) were the top contributors. Despite consistent results, these shares benefited from the influx of yield-oriented investors seeking dividend plays. Both shares sport dividend yields near 4%. The top performing name in the portfolio was NuSkin Enterprises (+56%), on strong new product rollouts and improved earnings. Among healthcare names, strong pharmaceutical results buoyed Johnson & Johnson, which returned +27% for the year. Additionally large-cap pharmaceutical firm Merck returned +26%. Among Utilities, shares of Black Hills Corporation rallied 48% on a successful merger integration and gas provider SCANA was up 29%. Within Telecom, service provider giants AT&T and Verizon, gained 19% and 24% for the fiscal year, respectively.
11 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
BALANCED INCOME FUND
During the review period, the Fund had average bond and cash allocations of 51.1% and 11.2%, respectively. The higher cash allocation reflects the fact that the Fund started operation on October 1, 2015. As a percentage of the Fund’s total assets, investment grade corporate bonds were the largest bond allocation at 29.0%, followed by mortgage-backed securities at 10.6%, U.S. government securities at 10.0%, and high yield bonds at 1.5%.
The Fund’s fixed income holdings returned 6.49%, outperforming the 5.23% return of its benchmark, the BofA Merrill Lynch US Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index. The Fund’s overweight in corporate bonds was a positive contributor to performance. As well, the Fund typically holds longer-maturity bonds to meet its income objective. During the review period, longer-maturity bonds outperformed the broad bond market as interest rates fell (when interest rates fall, bond prices increase).
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
12 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
BALANCED INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.15% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,036.97 | $5.86 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.25 | $5.81 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.82% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,039.43 | $4.18 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.90 | $4.14 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.69% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,040.05 | $3.52 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.55 | $3.49 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived and/or assumed. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
13 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
BALANCED INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Balanced Income Fund (Class A shares), the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Balanced Income Fund (Class A shares) beginning 10/1/15 (commencement of operations) with theoretical investments in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Indices”). The BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index tracks the performance of U.S. dollar denominated investment grade debt publicly issued in the US domestic market, including U.S. Treasuries, quasi-government securities, corporates, covered bonds and residential mortgage pass-through securities. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect
14 |
fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 1.22% and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been (1.21)%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 7.81% and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been (0.85)%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 7.84% and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been (0.91)%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and Standard & Poor’s 500 Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the period beginning 10/1/15 (commencement of operations).
***The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2016.
15 |
Portfolio of Investments
BALANCED INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
CORPORATE BONDS—41.1% | |||
Aerospace/Defense—.7% | |||
$ 200M | Rolls-Royce, PLC, 3.625%, 10/14/2025 (b) | $ 211,596 | |
Automotive—1.4% | |||
100M | Johnson Controls, Inc., 5%, 3/30/2020 | 109,907 | |
300M | O’Reilly Automotive, Inc., 3.55%, 3/15/2026 | 318,653 | |
428,560 | |||
Chemicals—1.1% | |||
200M | Agrium, Inc., 3.375%, 3/15/2025 | 206,423 | |
100M | Dow Chemical Co., 4.25%, 11/15/2020 | 108,670 | |
315,093 | |||
Consumer Non-Durables—.7% | |||
200M | Newell Brands, Inc., 4.2%, 4/1/2026 | 218,074 | |
Energy—.8% | |||
200M | Magellan Midstream Partners, LP, 5%, 3/1/2026 | 228,276 | |
Financial Services—4.2% | |||
American International Group, Inc.: | |||
100M | 4.7%, 7/10/2035 | 108,618 | |
300M | 3.75%, 7/10/2025 | 315,228 | |
100M | Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 5.3%, 3/15/2020 | 111,430 | |
100M | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 3.4%, 1/31/2022 | 108,379 | |
200M | ERAC USA Finance Co., 7%, 10/15/2037 (b) | 273,619 | |
General Electric Capital Corp.: | |||
200M | 3.1%, 1/9/2023 | 212,656 | |
100M | 6.75%, 3/15/2032 | 140,759 | |
1,270,689 | |||
Financials—10.8% | |||
200M | Bank of America Corp., 5.875%, 2/7/2042 | 261,700 | |
200M | Capital One Financial Corp., 3.75%, 4/24/2024 | 212,683 | |
Citigroup, Inc.: | |||
200M | 4.5%, 1/14/2022 | 221,149 | |
200M | 3.7%, 1/12/2026 | 211,500 | |
200M | Deutsche Bank AG, 3.7%, 5/30/2024 | 191,834 | |
200M | General Motors Financial Co., 5.25%, 3/1/2026 | 220,060 | |
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: | |||
200M | 3.625%, 1/22/2023 | 211,607 | |
100M | 6.125%, 2/15/2033 | 126,357 |
16 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Financials (continued) | |||
JPMorgan Chase & Co.: | |||
$ 100M | 4.5%, 1/24/2022 | $ 110,810 | |
100M | 6.4%, 5/15/2038 | 138,075 | |
Morgan Stanley: | |||
100M | 5.5%, 7/28/2021 | 114,175 | |
100M | 7.25%, 4/1/2032 | 139,098 | |
U.S. Bancorp: | |||
200M | 3.6%, 9/11/2024 | 214,570 | |
200M | 3.1%, 4/27/2026 | 206,853 | |
300M | Visa, Inc., 3.15%, 12/14/2025 | 317,270 | |
Wells Fargo & Co.: | |||
200M | 3.9%, 5/1/2045 | 206,299 | |
100M | 5.606%, 1/15/2044 | 119,730 | |
3,223,770 | |||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—1.5% | |||
Anheuser-Busch InBev Finance: | |||
100M | 3.65%, 2/1/2026 | 107,608 | |
200M | 4.7%, 2/1/2036 | 230,699 | |
100M | 4.9%, 2/1/2046 | 119,471 | |
457,778 | |||
Food/Drug—1.1% | |||
300M | CVS Health Corp., 3.875%, 7/20/2025 | 327,183 | |
Health Care—.7% | |||
200M | Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3.65%, 3/1/2026 | 215,517 | |
Information Technology—2.4% | |||
200M | Apple, Inc., 2.5%, 2/9/2025 | 202,668 | |
300M | Microsoft Corp., 3.7%, 8/8/2046 | 304,472 | |
Oracle Corp.: | |||
100M | 2.95%, 5/15/2025 | 103,408 | |
100M | 2.65%, 7/15/2026 | 100,147 | |
710,695 | |||
Media-Broadcasting—.8% | |||
200M | Comcast Corp., 4.25%, 1/15/2033 | 222,534 | |
Media-Diversified—.7% | |||
200M | Time Warner, Inc., 3.6%, 7/15/2025 | 213,133 |
17 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
BALANCED INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Real Estate—4.9% | |||
$ 300M | AvalonBay Communities, Inc., 3.5%, 11/15/2024 | $ 314,695 | |
200M | Boston Properties, LP, 2.75%, 10/1/2026 | 197,438 | |
200M | ERP Operating, LP, 3.375%, 6/1/2025 | 209,141 | |
300M | Prologis, LP, 3.75%, 11/1/2025 | 323,367 | |
200M | Simon Property Group, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2024 | 212,615 | |
200M | Welltower, Inc., 4%, 6/1/2025 | 212,454 | |
1,469,710 | |||
Retail-General Merchandise—1.7% | |||
200M | Amazon.com, Inc., 4.8%, 12/5/2034 | 235,710 | |
200M | Home Depot, Inc., 5.875%, 12/16/2036 | 274,856 | |
510,566 | |||
Telecommunications—2.2% | |||
AT&T, Inc.: | |||
100M | 3.8%, 3/15/2022 | 107,241 | |
200M | 5.15%, 3/15/2042 | 217,802 | |
Verizon Communications, Inc.: | |||
200M | 5.15%, 9/15/2023 | 233,332 | |
100M | 4.125%, 8/15/2046 | 100,452 | |
658,827 | |||
Transportation—1.6% | |||
200M | Burlington North Santa Fe, LLC, 5.15%, 9/1/2043 | 249,308 | |
200M | Cummins, Inc., 4.875%, 10/1/2043 | 237,585 | |
486,893 | |||
Utilities—3.8% | |||
200M | Dominion Resources, Inc., 3.9%, 10/1/2025 | 215,579 | |
200M | Duke Energy Progress, Inc., 4.15%, 12/1/2044 | 219,440 | |
100M | Entergy Arkansas, Inc., 4.95%, 12/15/2044 | 106,244 | |
200M | Ohio Power Co., 5.375%, 10/1/2021 | 229,122 | |
100M | Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., 4%, 12/15/2044 | 106,685 | |
200M | South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., 5.45%, 2/1/2041 | 252,502 | |
1,129,572 | |||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $12,026,044) | 12,298,466 |
18 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS—38.5% | |||
Consumer Discretionary—4.6% | |||
4,500 | American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | $ 80,370 | |
4,800 | DSW, Inc. – Class “A” | 98,304 | |
5,800 | Ford Motor Company | 70,006 | |
3,214 | Johnson Controls, Inc. | 149,547 | |
2,500 | L Brands, Inc. | 176,925 | |
3,400 | Newell Brands, Inc. | 179,044 | |
1,800 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 86,724 | |
3,400 | Regal Entertainment Group – Class “A” | 73,950 | |
10,400 | Stein Mart, Inc. | 66,040 | |
3,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 196,110 | |
550 | Whirlpool Corporation | 89,188 | |
1,500 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 100,995 | |
1,367,203 | |||
Consumer Staples—6.2% | |||
5,200 | Altria Group, Inc. | 328,796 | |
4,000 | B&G Foods, Inc. | 196,720 | |
3,200 | Coca-Cola Company | 135,424 | |
4,700 | Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV (ADR) | 106,455 | |
1,600 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 103,648 | |
2,400 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 261,048 | |
3,600 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 349,992 | |
1,300 | Procter & Gamble Company | 116,675 | |
2,200 | Sysco Corporation | 107,822 | |
2,200 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 158,664 | |
1,865,244 | |||
Energy—1.7% | |||
500 | Chevron Corporation | 51,460 | |
1,000 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 87,280 | |
1,150 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 46,679 | |
550 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 40,106 | |
2,700 | PBF Energy, Inc. – Class “A” | 61,128 | |
500 | Phillips 66 | 40,275 | |
1,500 | Royal Dutch Shell, PLC – Class “A” (ADR) | 75,105 | |
500 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 39,320 | |
2,100 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 58,338 | |
499,691 |
19 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
BALANCED INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Financials—3.9% | |||
1,250 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | $ 124,713 | |
2,300 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 63,733 | |
900 | Chubb, Ltd. | 113,085 | |
2,650 | Discover Financial Services | 149,857 | |
2,400 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 159,816 | |
2,600 | MetLife, Inc. | 115,518 | |
1,300 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 117,117 | |
3,200 | U.S. Bancorp | 137,248 | |
6,100 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 110,776 | |
2,000 | Wells Fargo & Company | 88,560 | |
1,180,423 | |||
Health Care—4.7% | |||
4,300 | Abbott Laboratories | 181,847 | |
4,000 | AbbVie, Inc. | 252,280 | |
4,700 | GlaxoSmithKline, PLC (ADR) | 202,711 | |
2,400 | Johnson & Johnson | 283,512 | |
3,100 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 193,471 | |
9,000 | Pfizer, Inc. | 304,830 | |
1,418,651 | |||
Industrials—4.0% | |||
1,500 | 3M Company | 264,345 | |
5,200 | General Electric Company | 154,024 | |
1,600 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 186,544 | |
4,400 | Koninklijke Philips NV (ADR) | 130,196 | |
1,100 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 263,692 | |
1,700 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 12,733 | |
8,000 | Triton International, Ltd. | 105,520 | |
900 | United Technologies Corporation | 91,440 | |
1,208,494 | |||
Information Technology—7.0% | |||
2,900 | Apple, Inc. | 327,845 | |
4,000 | Applied Materials, Inc. | 120,600 | |
7,200 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 228,384 | |
3,600 | Intel Corporation | 135,900 | |
1,000 | International Business Machines Corporation | 158,850 | |
4,600 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | 183,678 | |
5,300 | Microsoft Corporation | 305,280 | |
3,600 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 246,600 |
20 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
Information Technology (continued) | |||
5,200 | Symantec Corporation | $ 130,520 | |
6,400 | Travelport Worldwide, Ltd. | 96,192 | |
2,500 | Western Digital Corporation | 146,175 | |
2,080,024 | |||
Materials—.6% | |||
700 | Praxair, Inc. | 84,581 | |
1,600 | RPM International, Inc. | 85,952 | |
170,533 | |||
Real Estate—1.6% | |||
5,000 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 138,950 | |
3,200 | Chesapeake Lodging Trust (REIT) | 73,280 | |
11,200 | FelCor Lodging Trust, Inc. (REIT) | 72,016 | |
6,500 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 83,135 | |
1,150 | Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. (REIT) | 44,804 | |
3,500 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 77,770 | |
489,955 | |||
Telecommunication Services—1.6% | |||
6,500 | AT&T, Inc. | 263,965 | |
4,100 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 213,118 | |
477,083 | |||
Utilities—2.6% | |||
2,300 | Black Hills Corporation | 140,806 | |
2,200 | Duke Energy Corporation | 176,088 | |
3,100 | Exelon Corporation | 103,199 | |
4,200 | NiSource, Inc. | 101,262 | |
2,000 | SCANA Corporation | 144,740 | |
1,700 | WEC Energy Group, Inc. | 101,796 | |
767,891 | |||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $10,797,108) | 11,525,192 |
21 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
BALANCED INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||||||
Amount or | |||||||
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | |||||||
SECURITIES—8.2% | |||||||
Fannie Mae | |||||||
$ 855M | 3%, 5/1/2029 – 6/1/2046 | $ 892,118 | |||||
757M | 3.5%, 9/1/2045 – 10/13/2046 (a) | 799,677 | |||||
616M | 4%, 10/1/2035 – 10/13/2046 (a) | 666,588 | |||||
83M | 5%, 8/1/2039 | 92,745 | |||||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $2,435,385) | 2,451,128 | ||||||
VARIABLE AND FLOATING RATE NOTES†—4.0% | |||||||
1,200M | Illinois St. Fin. Auth. Rev., 0.85%, 7/1/2038 (cost $1,200,000) | 1,200,000 | |||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—2.9% | |||||||
875M | U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.5222%, 1/31/2018 (cost $876,295) † | 877,306 | |||||
EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS—2.0% | |||||||
6,650 | iShares iBoxx USD High Yield Corporate Bond | ||||||
ETF (ETF) (cost $550,093) | 580,279 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—3.3% | |||||||
$1,000M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.295%, 10/21/2016 (cost $999,836) | 999,910 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $28,884,761) | 100.0 | % | 29,932,281 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .0 | 9,161 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $29,941,442 |
(a) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis (see | |
Note 1G). | ||
(b) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). | |
† | Interest rates on adjustable rate bonds are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates | |
shown are the rates in effect at September 30, 2016. | ||
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust | |
USD | United States Dollar |
22 |
Futures contracts outstanding at September 30, 2016:
Value at | Unrealized | ||||||||||||
Number of | Value at | September 30, | Appreciation | ||||||||||
Contracts | Type | Expiration | Trade Date | 2016 | (Depreciation) | ||||||||
5 | 5 Year U.S. | Dec. 2016 | $ | 608,438 | $ | 609,234 | $ | 796 | |||||
Treasury Note | |||||||||||||
19 | 10 Year U.S. | Dec. 2016 | 2,488,609 | 2,485,601 | (3,008) | ||||||||
Treasury Note | |||||||||||||
6 | U.S. Treasury | Dec. 2016 | 1,025,438 | 1,041,861 | 16,423 | ||||||||
Long Bond | |||||||||||||
$ | 14,211 |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
23 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
BALANCED INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | $ | — | $ | 12,298,466 | $ | — | $ | 12,298,466 | ||||
Common Stocks | 11,525,192 | — | — | 11,525,192 | ||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 2,451,128 | — | 2,451,128 | ||||||||
Variable and Floating Rate Notes | — | 1,200,000 | — | 1,200,000 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 877,306 | — | 877,306 | ||||||||
Exchange Traded Funds | 580,279 | — | — | 580,279 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 999,910 | — | 999,910 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 12,105,471 | $ | 17,826,810 | $ | — | $ | 29,932,281 | ||||
Other Assets | ||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | $ | 14,211 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14,211 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for corporate bonds |
and common stocks. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
24 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
FLOATING RATE FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Floating Rate Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 3.69% for Class A shares, 3.92% for Advisor Class shares and 4.14% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 27.7 cents per share on Class A shares, 29.8 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 31.7 cents per share on Institutional Class shares.
In a welcome turn from the 2015 fiscal year, Fund investors in the current year benefited as senior loans delivered attractive positive performance, largely on stabilization of the Oil, Metals and Mining (coal and iron ore) sectors which had declined precipitously in 2015 and created an elevated level of market anxiety around lower-rated companies and defaults. In this environment in which some of the market’s lowest-rated and, in our view, lowest-quality credits outperformed, the Fund underperformed its benchmark. Late in the period, the senior loan market was also buoyed by market anticipation that the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) may be closer to an interest rate increase.
The Market
U.S. loan market performance can be divided into two distinct periods over the year. The Fund and the markets delivered a modest positive return in October 2015 to start the period, but declined in November, December, January and February, largely on the back of the demise of a highly speculative U.S. mutual fund and weaker oil prices. Negative sentiment was particularly pronounced in January, as oil continued to decline on concerns about a continued supply/demand imbalance and slow Chinese growth.
In mid-February, sentiment shifted dramatically—and seemingly without challenge throughout the rest of the period—as oil prices stabilized, leading to strong market performance through the rest of the period, save for a brief and shallow dip in June 2016. The rally in global risk assets gathered further impetus after the European Central Bank (“ECB”) announced an increase in the size and scope of its current Quantitative Easing program in addition to cutting rates. While not directly buying U.S. dollar high yield paper, the ECB’s continued stimulus of the European economy provided a clear headwind to Fed rate increases in the U.S. and signaled a likely “lower-for-longer” policy that spurred a global move to corporate credit.
Ordinarily, we would not expect senior loans, which have a floating rate coupon that can reset up along with interest rate increases, to benefit from global resignation to low interest rates. However, investors searching for lower-volatility yield opportunities appear to have found senior loans compelling and competitive in a world awash in negative-yielding fixed income. In our view, this trend was exacerbated as the prices of other risk assets, including global high yield bonds, rose steeply after February, causing some investors to look with interest at comparatively attractive senior loan valuations.
25 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
June saw some brief pricing volatility around risks outside of the U.S. high yield market. Notably, markets wobbled with the passage of the Brexit vote in which the UK citizenry voted to leave the European Union. Loans benefited thereafter on the back of the market’s sense that the Fed was becoming increasingly likely to impose an interest rate increase. Further, loans have benefited over recent months from a change in money market regulations, which no longer allow money market funds to offer fixed returns. Such regulations have forced LIBOR to rise. As most senior loans compute their coupons on a LIBOR-plus basis, changes in money market regulation have created unforeseen increases in senior loan coupons. These increases have not been directly in line with the rise in LIBOR—from about 22 basis points (“bps”) per annum at the start of the period, to approximately 85 bps per annum at the end of the period—because most loans in the market were already protected by LIBOR floors starting at 75 bps or higher. However, increases have moved approximately 40% of the senior loan market to, or above, their LIBOR-plus floors.
Overall, lower-rated, stressed, Basic Materials (Energy and Metals/Mining) widely outperformed from mid-February and for much of the period, but outperformance slowed toward the period’s end, as those energy companies which did not default became more fully priced and as oil prices softened yet again in the late days of summer.
The Fund
In this year of split returns, the Fund outperformed its Index (the J.P. Morgan BB/B Leveraged Loan Index) when the market was most challenged through mid-February 2016 and underperformed the Index in its more bullish subsequent phase. This result aligns with our core positioning throughout the year in which we generally kept the Fund less risk-exposed than the market to the Energy and Metals/Mining sectors. While our Metals and Mining exposure was generally higher than that of the market, and our Energy exposure less than that of the market, in both of those sectors we attempted to find higher-quality credits we believed could be more reliable even if the price of energy and other commodities did not prove stable at levels that would stem those sectors’ elevated default rates. Outside of these sectors, we committed significant capital to a range of less-cyclical, more defensive industries such as Healthcare, Basic Materials, Telecommunications, and Food and Beverages. Our overweight of Chemicals was perhaps an exception to this defensive positioning.
In general, we also maintained a portfolio with lower-than-market rating risk throughout the year, reflecting our overarching goal to create a portfolio that is less directional over time than the market, and less susceptible to price challenges imposed by risk-off events. We allocated approximately 20% less of the Fund to B-rated credit than did the market. We believe, however, that as loan prices continued to rise through the year, it was important not to chase yield and risk to keep up with the market. We cannot predict when the market will experience volatility, but we believe it far more valuable in the longer
26 |
run to be positioned to provide liquidity to the market at those moments than to be fully leveraged to a rising market before such a correction occurs. In short, we have targeted building a portfolio we believe can be more resilient than the market in a re-pricing event, and in which we can take advantage of opportunities we believe are unduly discounted.
Outlook
On a positive note, we actually believe that a challenge to senior loan pricing is most likely to come from outside the loan market at this time, rather than from within the loan market itself. While the credit cycle appears to be maturing, the credit quality of high yield companies borrowing in the senior loan market is generally still fairly solid, with few companies subject to near-term maturities that could become unduly burdensome. Trailing 12-month market default rates are actually falling now that commodity-related defaults appear to be largely completed. Rather, we believe that challenges to the senior loan market are likely to come from any larger event that reduces market liquidity overall. Such an event—whether caused by political outcomes (Brexit, U.S. elections), or even by a single anomalous event such as a terror attack—would likely impact risk assets outside of high yield even more broadly. By contrast, central bank action to increase rates may challenge higher-rated fixed income and risk assets alike, while benefiting investors in senior loans who can benefit from increasing coupons once LIBOR moves above the LIBOR floor rates present in most loans.
The questions remain—what can investors expect in terms of returns going forward and what will drive markets until year-end? We believe given the strong rally of the last few months, investors should expect more of a coupon-like return. Given paltry government yields, however, global corporates remain attractive on a relative basis. Further, loans, with their floating rate capacity, should benefit most directly should rates rise. We expect returns to be driven by technical flows, central bank talk/action and other macro factors like the U.S. election. The world is watching.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
27 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
FLOATING RATE FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.10% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,030.76 | $5.58 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.50 | $5.55 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.90% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,032.79 | $4.57 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.50 | $4.55 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.70% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,033.81 | $3.56 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.50 | $3.54 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived and/or assumed. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
28 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
FLOATING RATE FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Floating Rate Fund (Class A shares) and the J.P. Morgan BB/B Leveraged Loan Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Floating Rate Fund (Class A shares) beginning 10/21/13 (commencement of operations) with a theoretical investment in the J.P. Morgan BB/B Leveraged Loan Index (the “Index”). The Index is a subset of the J.P. Morgan Leveraged Loan Index, which is designed to represent the investable universe of the U.S. dollar-denominated leveraged loan market. The Index includes U.S. dollar-denominated institutional term loans and fully funded delayed draw term loans which have high yield ratings. However, the most aggressively rated loans and non-rated loans are excluded. Loans can be rated as high as Baa1 and as low as BB3 by Moody’s and also as high as BBB+ and as low as B- by Standard & Poor’s. A loan with the highest allowable rating from each agency will only be included if the company’s overall rating is below investment grade. Loans must be issued by companies domiciled in a developed market, and defaulted loans may remain in the Index only if they remain current on loan obligation payments throughout the default
29 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
process. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance will be greater than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for one year and Since Inception would have been (2.39)% and (0.71)%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 2.48%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for one year and Since Inception would have been 3.84% and 1.78%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 2.86%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for one year and Since Inception would have been 4.01% and 1.78%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 3.06%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from J.P. Morgan and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the period beginning 10/21/13 (commencement of operations).
*** The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2016.
30 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
LOAN PARTICIPATIONS†—91.1% | |||
Aerospace/Defense—1.7% | |||
$ 539M | B/E Aerospace, Inc., 3.7867%, 12/16/2021 | $ 546,872 | |
TransDigm, Inc.: | |||
1,363M | 3.8214%, 2/28/2020 | 1,364,987 | |
350M | 3.75%, 5/14/2022 | 350,620 | |
2,262,479 | |||
Automotive—4.5% | |||
1,026M | CS Intermediate Holdco 2, LLC, 4%, 4/4/2021 | 1,031,989 | |
1,001M | FCA U.S., LLC, 3.5%, 5/24/2017 | 1,005,119 | |
848M | Federal-Mogul Corp., 4%, 4/15/2018 | 839,874 | |
987M | KAR Auction Services, Inc., 4.0625%, 3/11/2021 | 993,964 | |
836M | Key Safety Systems, Inc., 5.5%, 8/29/2021 | 846,379 | |
625M | Tectum Holdings, Inc., 5.75%, 8/24/2023 (a) | 624,219 | |
668M | TI Group Automotive Systems, LLC, 4.5%, 6/30/2022 | 671,174 | |
6,012,718 | |||
Building Materials—2.0% | |||
939M | Builders FirstSource, Inc., 6%, 7/29/2022 | 945,598 | |
494M | Headwaters, Inc., 4%, 3/24/2022 | 496,630 | |
1,276M | USIC Holdings, Inc., 4%, 7/10/2020 | 1,271,653 | |
2,713,881 | |||
Chemicals—5.2% | |||
873M | A. Schulman, Inc., 4%, 6/1/2022 | 874,306 | |
962M | Emerald Performance Materials, LLC, 4.5%, 7/30/2021 | 964,022 | |
496M | Huntsman International, LLC, 3.75%, 10/1/2021 | 499,411 | |
650M | MacDermid, Inc., 4%, 6/7/2020 | 652,946 | |
668M | Methanol Holdings Trinidad, Inc., 4.25%, 6/30/2022 | 663,238 | |
1,247M | PQ Corp., 5.75%, 11/4/2022 | 1,253,888 | |
987M | Trinseo Materials Operating SCA, 4.25%, 11/5/2021 | 998,953 | |
916M | Univar USA, Inc., 4.25%, 7/1/2022 | 918,117 | |
250M | Versum Material, Inc., 3.25%, 9/21/2023 | 251,875 | |
7,076,756 | |||
Consumer Non Durables—2.3% | |||
900M | Revlon Consumer Products, Inc., 4.25%,9/7/2023 (a) | 903,151 | |
1,236M | Reynolds Group Holdings, Inc., 4.25%, 2/5/2023 (a) | 1,241,024 | |
950M | Spectrum Brands, Inc., 3.5029%, 6/23/2022 | 954,385 | |
3,098,560 |
31 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Energy—2.0% | |||
$ 885M | Granite Acquisition, Inc., 5%, 12/17/2021 | $ 871,917 | |
925M | Jonah Energy, LLC, 7.5%, 5/12/2021 | 834,813 | |
1,000M | NRG Energy, Inc., 3.5%, 6/30/2023 (a) | 1,003,625 | |
2,710,355 | |||
Financial Services—2.8% | |||
1,728M | Delos Finance Sarl, 3.5877%, 3/6/2021 | 1,741,231 | |
496M | Ineos U.S. Finance, LLC, 3.75%, 12/15/2020 | 498,077 | |
1,477M | RPI Finance Trust, 3.5877%, 11/9/2020 | 1,487,416 | |
3,726,724 | |||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—2.8% | |||
705M | Aramark Corp., 3.3377%, 9/7/2019 | 709,105 | |
533M | B&G Foods, Inc., 3.8393%, 11/02/2022 | 537,292 | |
100M | Chobani, LLC, 5.25%, 9/29/2023 (b) | 99,500 | |
942M | Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., 5.25%, 3/3/2023 | 953,573 | |
Pinnacle Foods Finance, LLC: | |||
731M | 3.25%, 4/29/2020 | 734,679 | |
744M | 3.2753%, 1/13/2023 | 751,354 | |
3,785,503 | |||
Food/Drug—2.0% | |||
622M | Albertson’s, LLC, 4.75%, 12/21/2022 | 628,422 | |
2,075M | Rite Aid Corp., 4.875%, 6/21/2021 | 2,081,485 | |
2,709,907 | |||
Forest Products/Container—3.5% | |||
978M | Ardagh Holdings USA, Inc., 4%, 12/17/2019 | 982,566 | |
Berry Plastics Group, Inc.: | |||
670M | 3.5%, 2/8/2020 | 671,534 | |
924M | 3.75%, 10/1/2022 | 927,497 | |
715M | BWAY Holding Co., 5.5%, 8/14/2020 | 720,083 | |
708M | Exopack Holdings SA, 4.5%, 5/8/2019 | 709,293 | |
740M | Owens Illinois, Inc., 3.5%, 9/1/2022 | 746,614 | |
4,757,587 |
32 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Gaming/Leisure—4.4% | |||
$ 881M | AMC Entertainment, Inc., 4%, 12/15/2022 | $ 890,058 | |
1,265M | Hilton Worldwide Finance, LLC, 3.5%, 10/26/2020 | 1,272,197 | |
1,072M | La Quinta Intermediate Holdings, LLC, 3.75%, 4/14/2021 | 1,072,444 | |
1,472M | Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., 3.59%, 8/17/2020 | 1,481,044 | |
272M | Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., 3.75%, 4/28/2023 | 272,868 | |
874M | Seminole Hard Rock Entertainment, Inc., 3.5877%, 5/14/2020 | 876,939 | |
5,865,550 | |||
Health Care—9.8% | |||
1,016M | Acadia Healthcare Co., Inc., 3.75%, 2/11/2022 | 1,023,801 | |
Community Health Systems, Inc.: | |||
226M | 3.75%, 12/31/2019 | 221,721 | |
766M | 4%, 1/27/2021 | 753,546 | |
1,141M | ConvaTec, Inc., 4.25%, 6/15/2020 | 1,146,333 | |
275M | Cotiviti Holdings, Inc., 3.75%, 9/22/2023 (a) | 276,031 | |
568M | DaVita Health Care Partners, Inc., 3.5%, 6/24/2021 | 571,643 | |
1,166M | Envision Healthcare Corp., 4.5%, 10/28/2022 | 1,172,311 | |
445M | ExamWorks Group, Inc., 4.75%, 7/27/2023 | 448,894 | |
535M | Grifols Worldwide Operations USA, Inc., 3.4479%, 2/27/2021 | 540,183 | |
994M | IMS Health, Inc., 3.5%, 3/17/2021 | 997,892 | |
569M | Kindred Healthcare, Inc., 4.25%, 4/9/2021 | 568,482 | |
568M | Mallinckrodt International Finance SA, 3.5877%, 3/19/2021 | 568,350 | |
104M | Medpace Holdings, Inc., 4.75%, 4/1/2021 | 103,938 | |
531M | MultiPlan, Inc., 5%, 6/7/2023 | 538,310 | |
1,152M | NBTY, Inc., 5%, 5/5/2023 | 1,159,313 | |
405M | Onex Carestream Health, Inc., 5%, 6/7/2019 | 375,917 | |
546M | Select Medical Corp., 6%, 6/1/2018 | 547,630 | |
2,205M | Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 3.5%, 12/11/2019 | 2,212,018 | |
13,226,313 | |||
Industrials—.3% | |||
125M | GFL Environmental, Inc., 3.75%, 9/27/2023 (a) | 125,234 | |
250M | SIG Combibloc Holdings SCA, 4%, 3/11/2022 (a) | 250,656 | |
375,890 | |||
Information Technology—7.0% | |||
331M | ARRIS Enterprises, Inc., 3.5%, 4/17/2020 | 331,102 | |
1,181M | Avago Technologies, Inc., 3.5243%, 2/1/2023 | 1,195,518 | |
1,600M | Avast Software BV, 5%, 8/3/2022 (a) | 1,608,000 | |
881M | Dell International, LLC, 4%, 9/7/2023 | 886,793 | |
1,600M | Dell Software Group, Inc., 7%, 9/27/2022 (a) | 1,588,333 |
33 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Information Technology (continued) | |||
$1,272M | Global Payments, Inc., 4.0244%, 4/22/2023 | $ 1,286,651 | |
489M | Kronos, Inc., 4.5%, 10/30/2019 | 491,483 | |
756M | Match Group, Inc., 5.5%, 11/16/2022 | 760,347 | |
476M | Microsemi Corp., 3.75%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 480,805 | |
738M | Western Digital Corp., 4.5%, 4/29/2023 | 747,376 | |
9,376,408 | |||
Manufacturing—6.9% | |||
1,121M | Brand Energy & Infrastructure Services, Inc., 4.75%, 11/26/2020 | 1,111,054 | |
979M | Filtration Group, Corp., 4.25%, 11/20/2020 | 982,921 | |
681M | Gardner Denver, Inc., 4.25%, 7/30/2020 | 661,506 | |
HD Supply, Inc.: | |||
995M | 3.75%, 8/13/2021 | 997,694 | |
248M | 3.75%, 10/16/2023 (a) | 247,810 | |
975M | Husky Injection Molding System, 4.25%, 6/30/2021 | 974,474 | |
1,019M | Mirror BidCo Corp., 4.25%, 12/28/2019 | 1,019,166 | |
937M | Onex Wizard Acquisition Co. I Sarl, 4.25%, 3/11/2022 | 939,621 | |
1,185M | Rexnord, LLC, 4%, 8/21/2020 (a) | 1,187,807 | |
1,219M | U.S. Farathane, LLC, 5.75%, 12/23/2021 | 1,225,333 | |
9,347,386 | |||
Media-Cable TV—4.4% | |||
1,746M | Altice U.S. Finance 1 Corp., 4.2538%, 12/14/2022 | 1,758,103 | |
1,368M | CCO Safari III, LLC, 3.5%, 1/24/2023 | 1,378,528 | |
1,022M | CSC Holdings, LLC, 5%, 10/9/2024 | 1,028,401 | |
888M | Gray Television, Inc., 3.9375%, 6/13/2021 | 893,406 | |
300M | Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., 3%, 9/26/2023 (a) | 301,875 | |
617M | Raycom TV Broadcasting, LLC, 3.75%, 8/4/2021 | 608,139 | |
5,968,452 | |||
Media-Diversified—1.9% | |||
1,154M | Media General, Inc., 4%, 7/31/2020 | 1,155,614 | |
607M | Tribune Media Co., 3.75%, 12/27/2020 | 613,784 | |
825M | Virgin Media Investment Holdings, Ltd., 3.6492%, 6/30/2023 | 829,771 | |
2,599,169 |
34 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Metals/Mining—3.8% | |||
$1,224M | FMG Resources (August 2006), 3.75%, 6/30/2019 | $ 1,224,254 | |
1,200M | McJunkin Red Man Corp., 5%, 11/8/2019 (a) | 1,171,496 | |
1,189M | Novelis, Inc., 4.0002%, 6/2/2022 | 1,195,145 | |
886M | TMS International Corp., 4.5%, 10/16/2020 | 812,414 | |
673M | Zekelman Industries, Inc., 6%, 6/14/2021 | 680,046 | |
5,083,355 | |||
Real Estate—.4% | |||
580M | Realogy Group, LLC, 3.75%, 7/20/2022 | 584,868 | |
Retail-General Merchandise—9.7% | |||
920M | 1-800 Contacts, 5.25%, 1/15/2023 | 927,566 | |
268M | Dollar Tree, Inc., 3.0625%, 7/6/2022 | 269,537 | |
521M | General Nutrition Centers, Inc., 3.25%, 3/4/2019 | 520,765 | |
985M | Hanesbrands, Inc., 3.25%, 4/28/2022 | 991,567 | |
1,550M | Harbor Freight Tools USA, 4%, 8/16/2023 | 1,561,302 | |
723M | Hertz Corp., 3.5%, 6/30/2023 | 729,855 | |
Landry’s, Inc.: | |||
854M | 4%, 4/24/2018 | 856,344 | |
1,125M | 4%, 9/23/2023 | 1,131,680 | |
1,004M | Michaels Stores, Inc., 3.75%, 1/27/2023 (a) | 1,008,233 | |
875M | Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., 4.25%, 10/25/2020 | 813,378 | |
1,136M | Party City Holdings, Inc., 4.4722%, 8/19/2022 | 1,140,042 | |
988M | PetSmart, Inc., 4.25%, 3/11/2022 | 990,940 | |
1,082M | Restaurant Brands, Inc., 3.75%, 12/10/2021 | 1,090,786 | |
1,022M | Yum! Brands, Inc., 3.2809%, 6/16/2023 | 1,032,662 | |
13,064,657 | |||
Services—3.3% | |||
353M | AECOM, 3.75%, 10/15/2021 | 355,283 | |
965M | Brickman Group, Ltd., LLC, 4%, 12/18/2020 | 964,791 | |
792M | Doosan Infrascore International, Inc., 4.5%, 5/28/2021 | 802,207 | |
750M | Monitronics International, Inc., 4.25%, 3/23/2018 (a) | 748,647 | |
1,550M | Safway Group Holding, LLC, 5.75%, 8/21/2023 | 1,562,916 | |
4,433,844 |
35 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Telecommunications—3.3% | |||
$1,139M | CommScope, Inc., 3.75%, 12/29/2022 | $ 1,150,360 | |
Level 3 Financing, Inc.: | |||
285M | 3.5%, 5/31/2022 | 287,077 | |
1,000M | 4%, 8/1/2019 | 1,005,625 | |
1,347M | Numericable U.S., LLC, 5%, 1/15/2024 | 1,359,530 | |
650M | Telenet Group Holding, 4.3566%, 6/30/2024 | 656,704 | |
4,459,296 | |||
Transportation—.5% | |||
623M | XPO Logistics, Inc., 4.25% 11/01/2021 | 627,821 | |
Utilities—3.1% | |||
963M | Calpine Corp., 3.5%, 5/27/2022 | 967,043 | |
425M | Dayton Power & Light Co., 4%, 8/24/2022 | 430,844 | |
1,477M | Dynegy, Inc., 4%, 4/23/2020 | 1,483,951 | |
1,275M | Texas Competitive Electric, 5%, 10/31/2017 (a) | 1,285,757 | |
4,167,595 | |||
Waste Management—.8% | |||
1,032M | ADS Waste Holdings, Inc., 3.75%, 10/9/2019 | 1,034,003 | |
Wireless Communications—2.7% | |||
1,084M | GCI Holdings, Inc., 4%, 2/2/2022 | 1,080,052 | |
1,350M | Intelsat Jackson Holdings, Ltd., 3.75%, 6/30/2019 | 1,285,453 | |
1,176M | Telesat Canada, 3.5%, 3/28/2019 | 1,180,180 | |
149M | T-Mobile USA, Inc., 3.5%, 11/9/2022 | 150,131 | |
3,695,816 | |||
Total Value of Loan Participations (cost $121,860,826) | 122,764,893 | ||
CORPORATE BONDS—5.1% | |||
Automotive—.5% | |||
610M | American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., 7.75%, 11/15/2019 | 693,875 | |
Energy—.8% | |||
1,000M | Targa Resources Partners, LP, 4.125%, 11/15/2019 | 1,019,000 | |
Financials—.4% | |||
626M | Consolidated Energy Finance SA, 6.75%, 10/15/2019 (c) | 621,305 |
36 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Health Care—1.1% | |||||||
$ 800M | Centene Corp., 5.625%, 2/15/2021 | $ 850,000 | |||||
150M | Endo Finance, LLC, 7.75%, 1/15/2022 (c) | 144,750 | |||||
450M | Molina Healthcare, Inc., 5.375%, 11/15/2022 | 466,875 | |||||
1,461,625 | |||||||
Media-Cable TV—.4% | |||||||
500M | DISH DBS Corp., 7.875%, 9/1/2019 | 561,250 | |||||
Metals/Mining—.4% | |||||||
550M | Steel Dynamics, Inc., 6.125%, 8/15/2019 | 567,215 | |||||
Real Estate—.4% | |||||||
500M | Iron Mountain, Inc., 6%, 10/1/2020 (c) | 528,750 | |||||
Telecommunications—.2% | |||||||
225M | Wind Acquisition Finance SA, 4.75%, 7/15/2020 (c) | 227,813 | |||||
Utilities—.2% | |||||||
305M | Calpine Corp., 6%, 1/15/2022 (c) | 319,678 | |||||
Wireless Communications—.7% | |||||||
600M | MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 6.625%, 11/15/2020 | 617,250 | |||||
250M | T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.125%, 1/15/2022 | 266,562 | |||||
883,812 | |||||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $6,749,947) | 6,884,323 | ||||||
VARIABLE AND FLOATING RATE NOTES—.2% | |||||||
Utilities | |||||||
219M | AES Corp., 3.8421%, 6/1/2019 (cost $221,104) † | 220,095 | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—3.7% | |||||||
5,000M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.285%, 11/8/2016 ($4,998,496) | 4,998,950 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $133,830,373) | 100.1 | % | 134,868,261 | ||||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.1 | ) | (324,369) | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $134,543,892 |
† | Interest rates are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates above are the rates in effect |
at September 30, 2016. |
37 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FLOATING RATE FUND
September 30, 2016
(a) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis (see |
Note 1G). | |
(b) | Security valued at fair value (see Note 1A) |
(c) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Loan Participations | $ | — | $ | 122,764,893 | $ | — | $ | 122,764,893 | ||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 6,884,323 | — | 6,884,323 | ||||||||
Variable & Floating Rate Notes | — | 220,095 | — | 220,095 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 4,998,950 | — | 4,998,950 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | — | $ | 134,868,261 | $ | — | $ | 134,868,261 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization of loan |
participations and corporate bonds. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
38 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
FUND FOR INCOME
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Fund For Income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 9.07% for Class A shares, 7.99% for Class B shares, 9.34% for Advisor Class shares and 9.58% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 12.0 cents per share on Class A shares, 9.6 cents on Class B shares, 12.6 cents on Advisor Class shares and 13.2 cents on Institutional Class shares.
In a welcome turn from the 2015 fiscal year, Fund investors in the current year benefited from attractive returns, as high yield came roaring back, largely on stabilization of the Oil and Metals and Mining (coal and iron ore) sectors, which had declined precipitously in 2015 and created an elevated level of high yield company bond defaults. In this environment in which some of the market’s lowest-rated and, in our view, lowest-quality, credits outperformed, the Fund underperformed its benchmark.
The Market
U.S. high yield market performance can be divided into two distinct periods over the year. The Fund and the markets delivered an attractive return in October 2015 to start the period, but declined sharply in November, December, January, and the first half of February, largely on the back of the demise of a highly speculative U.S. mutual fund and weaker oil prices. Negative sentiment was particularly pronounced in January, as oil continued to decline on concerns about a continued supply/demand imbalance and slow Chinese growth.
In mid-February, sentiment shifted dramatically—and seemingly without challenge throughout the rest of the period—as oil prices stabilized. The rally in global risk assets, including U.S. high yield, gathered further impetus after the European Central Bank (“ECB”) announced an increase in the size and scope of its current Quantitative Easing program in addition to cutting rates. While not directly buying U.S. dollar high yield paper, the ECB’s continued stimulus of the European economy provided a clear headwind to Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) rate increases and signaled a likely “lower-for-longer” policy that spurred a global move to corporate credit. Global credit markets experienced inflows for much of the remainder of the period as investors looked initially to take advantage of attractive valuations after a challenging 2015 and then—even as bond prices appreciated—to capture yield wherever it was available, including in both lower-rated and longer-duration credit (where the duration of a bond measures its sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Generally, when interest rates increase, bond prices may decrease).
39 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
May, June, and September, while still delivering positive U.S. high yield returns, saw some brief pricing volatility around risks outside of the U.S. high yield market. Notably, markets wobbled in May (the Brexit vote was on June 23rd) with the passage of the Brexit vote in which the UK citizenry voted to leave the European Union, and in September on the back of the market’s sense that the Fed was becoming increasingly likely to impose an interest rate increase.
Overall, lower-rated, stressed, Basic Materials (Energy and Metals/Mining) outperformed from mid-February and for much of the period, but outperformance slowed toward the period’s end, as those energy companies which did not default became more fully priced and as oil prices softened yet again in the late days of summer.
The Fund
In this year of split returns, the Fund outperformed its Index (the BofA Merrill Lynch BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index) when the market was most challenged through mid-February 2016 and underperformed the Index in its more bullish subsequent phase. This result aligns with our core positioning throughout the year in which we generally kept the Fund less exposed than the market to the Energy and Metals and Mining sectors, and, within those sectors, attempted to find higher-quality credits we believed could be more reliable even if the price of energy and other commodities did not prove stable at levels that would stem those sectors’ elevated default rates. Outside of these sectors, we committed significant capital to less-cyclical, more defensive industries such as Healthcare, Cable TV, and Telecommunications. These sectors also delivered the Fund’s biggest contributions on an absolute basis.
We also maintained a portfolio with lower-than-market duration risk throughout the year, reflecting our overarching goal to create a portfolio that is generally less directional over time than the market, and less susceptible to price challenges imposed by risk-off events, such as interest rate increases. Together, the Fund’s lower-risk Energy and Commodities exposures, and lower-duration risk, account for the Fund’s underperformance for the year. We believe, however, that as bond prices continued to rise through the year, it was important not to chase yield and risk to keep up with the market. We cannot predict when the market will experience volatility, but we believe it far more valuable in the longer run to be positioned to provide liquidity to the market at those moments, than to be fully leveraged to a rising market before such a correction occurs. In short, we have targeted building a portfolio we believe can be more resilient than the market in a re-pricing event, and in which we can take advantage of opportunities we believe are unduly discounted.
40 |
Outlook
On a positive note, we actually believe that a challenge to high yield pricing is most likely to come from outside the high yield market at this time, rather than from within high yield itself. While the credit cycle appears to be maturing, the credit quality of high yield companies is generally still fairly solid, with few companies subject to near term maturities that could become unduly burdensome. Trailing 12-month market default rates are actually falling now that commodity-related defaults appear to be largely completed. Rather, we believe that challenges to the high yield market are likely to come from any larger event that reduces market liquidity overall. Such an event—whether caused by central bank policy, political outcomes (Brexit, U.S. elections), or even by a single anomalous event such as a terror attack—would likely impact risk assets outside of high yield even more broadly.
The questions remain—what can investors expect in terms of returns going forward and what will drive markets until year-end? We believe given the strong rally of the last few months, investors should expect more of a coupon-like return. Given paltry government yields, however, global corporates remain attractive on a relative basis. We expect returns to be driven by technical flows, central bank talk/action and other macro factors like the U.S. election. The world is watching.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
41 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.21% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,072.43 | $ 6.27 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.95 | $ 6.11 | |
Class B Shares | 2.04% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,067.17 | $10.54 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.80 | $10.28 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.91% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,073.74 | $ 4.72 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.45 | $ 4.60 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.78% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,074.73 | $ 4.05 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.10 | $ 3.94 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total value of investments. |
42 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Fund For Income (Class A shares), the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Fund For Income (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/06 with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index (the “Index”). The Index contains all securities in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Index rated BB1 through B3, based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, but caps issuer exposure at 2%. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and
43 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 2.61%, 5.53% and 4.13%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 3.55%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 3.96%, 5.62% and 4.11%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 2.80%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 9.31% and 3.46%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 4.03%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 9.54% and 3.74%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 4.06%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. The issuers of high yield bonds, in which the Fund primarily invests, pay higher interest rates because they have a greater likelihood of financial difficulty, which could result in their inability to repay the bonds fully when due. Prices of high yield bonds are also subject to greater fluctuations. Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
*** The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2016.
† The Index return is for ten years. The Index return since inception of the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares is 4.92%.
44 |
Portfolio of Investments
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
CORPORATE BONDS—86.3% | |||
Aerospace/Defense—.9% | |||
Meccanica Holdings USA, Inc.: | |||
$ 1,871M | 7.375%, 7/15/2039 (a) | $ 2,062,778 | |
750M | 6.25%, 1/15/2040 (a) | 740,625 | |
3,475M | TransDigm, Inc., 6.375%, 6/15/2026 (a) | 3,605,312 | |
6,408,715 | |||
Automotive—4.5% | |||
1,325M | Allison Transmission, Inc., 5%, 10/1/2024 (a) | 1,361,437 | |
1,175M | American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc., 6.625%, 10/15/2022 | 1,248,437 | |
1,725M | Asbury Automotive Group, Inc., 6%, 12/15/2024 | 1,785,375 | |
Dana Holding Corp.: | |||
2,000M | 6%, 9/15/2023 | 2,090,000 | |
700M | 5.5%, 12/15/2024 | 717,500 | |
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV: | |||
925M | 4.5%, 4/15/2020 | 952,750 | |
2,350M | 5.25%, 4/15/2023 | 2,426,375 | |
750M | Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 7%, 5/15/2022 | 796,875 | |
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.: | |||
2,375M | 5%, 6/1/2022 | 2,394,285 | |
1,425M | 5.25%, 12/15/2023 (a) | 1,437,469 | |
750M | Hertz Corp., 6.75%, 4/15/2019 | 767,430 | |
IHO Verwaltungs GmbH: | |||
2,050M | 4.75%, 5/15/2021 (a) | 2,127,900 | |
550M | 4.125%, 9/15/2021 (a) | 556,529 | |
1,075M | 4.5%, 9/15/2023 (a) | 1,088,438 | |
3,650M | LKQ Corp., 4.75%, 5/15/2023 | 3,768,625 | |
2,700M | Meritor, Inc., 6.25%, 2/15/2024 | 2,598,750 | |
3,050M | Omega U.S. Sub, LLC, 8.75%, 7/15/2023 (a) | 3,332,125 | |
ZF North America Capital, Inc.: | |||
550M | 4%, 4/29/2020 (a) | 583,687 | |
1,225M | 4.5%, 4/29/2022 (a) | 1,303,559 | |
31,337,546 | |||
Building Materials—.9% | |||
1,950M | Building Materials Corp., 5.375%, 11/15/2024 (a) | 2,018,250 | |
4,200M | Griffon Corp., 5.25%, 3/1/2022 | 4,231,500 | |
6,249,750 |
45 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Chemicals—2.8% | |||
Blue Cube Spinco, Inc.: | |||
$ 850M | 9.75%, 10/15/2023 (a) | $ 1,003,000 | |
3,225M | 10%, 10/15/2025 (a) | 3,821,625 | |
3,100M | Platform Specialty Products Corp., 10.375%, 5/1/2021 (a) | 3,348,000 | |
1,675M | PolyOne Corp., 5.25%, 3/15/2023 | 1,742,202 | |
825M | PQ Corp., 6.75%, 11/15/2022 (a) | 876,563 | |
1,350M | Rayonier AM Products, Inc., 5.5%, 6/1/2024 (a) | 1,242,000 | |
1,350M | TPC Group, Inc., 8.75%, 12/15/2020 (a) | 1,053,742 | |
2,200M | Tronox Finance, LLC, 6.375%, 8/15/2020 | 2,040,500 | |
2,575M | Univar USA, Inc., 6.75%, 7/15/2023 (a) | 2,665,125 | |
W.R. Grace & Co.: | |||
1,250M | 5.125%, 10/1/2021 (a) | 1,331,250 | |
525M | 5.625%, 10/1/2024 (a) | 572,906 | |
19,696,913 | |||
Consumer Non-Durables—1.1% | |||
1,750M | Kronos Acquisition Holdings, 9%, 8/15/2023 (a) | 1,812,335 | |
Reynolds Group Issuer, Inc.: | |||
2,875M | 5.75%, 10/15/2020 | 2,968,438 | |
850M | 5.125%, 7/15/2023 (a) | 878,688 | |
1,375M | Standard Industries, Inc., 5.5%, 2/15/2023 (a) | 1,443,750 | |
975M | Wolverine World Wide, Inc., 5%, 9/1/2026 (a) | 987,188 | |
8,090,399 | |||
Energy—10.9% | |||
AmeriGas Finance, LLC: | |||
1,250M | 7%, 5/20/2022 | 1,328,125 | |
775M | 5.625%, 5/20/2024 | 823,437 | |
775M | 5.875%, 8/20/2026 | 823,437 | |
Antero Resources Corp. | |||
950M | 5.375%, 11/1/2021 | 965,437 | |
925M | 5.125%, 12/1/2022 | 936,562 | |
1,375M | Blue Racer Midstream, LLC, 6.125%, 11/15/2022 (a) | 1,350,938 | |
425M | Callon Petroleum Co., 6.125%, 10/1/2024 (a)(b) | 440,937 | |
1,600M | Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc., 6.25%, 4/15/2023 | 1,592,000 | |
2,125M | Cheniere Corpus Christi Holdings, 7%, 6/30/2024 (a) | 2,305,625 | |
Concho Resources Holdings. LLC: | |||
600M | 5.5%, 10/1/2022 | 625,500 | |
800M | 5.5%, 4/1/2023 | 829,000 |
46 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Energy (continued) | |||
Continental Resources, Inc.: | |||
$ 2,900M | 4.5%, 4/15/2023 | $ 2,798,500 | |
2,050M | 3.8%, 6/1/2024 | 1,886,000 | |
825M | 4.9%, 6/1/2044 | 697,125 | |
2,175M | Crestwood Midstream Partners, LP, 6.25%, 4/1/2023 | 2,213,062 | |
2,450M | Exterran Partners, LP, 6%, 10/1/2022 | 2,284,625 | |
325M | Ferrellgas Partners, LP, 7%, 6/15/2023 | 287,625 | |
1,950M | Forum Energy Technologies, Inc., 6.25%, 10/1/2021 | 1,857,375 | |
Genesis Energy, LP: | |||
525M | 5.75%, 2/15/2021 | 527,625 | |
1,400M | 6.75%, 8/1/2022 | 1,449,532 | |
1,050M | 6%, 5/15/2023 | 1,047,375 | |
500M | 5.625%, 6/15/2024 | 492,500 | |
1,375M | Gibson Energy, Inc., 6.75%, 7/15/2021 (a) | 1,412,812 | |
1,575M | Gulfport Energy Corp., 7.75%, 11/1/2020 | 1,641,938 | |
2,675M | Hilcorp Energy I, 5.75%, 10/1/2025 (a) | 2,675,000 | |
2,600M | Laredo Petroleum, Inc., 5.625%, 1/15/2022 | 2,535,000 | |
Marathon Oil Corp.: | |||
125M | 2.7%, 6/1/2020 | 122,622 | |
1,300M | 2.8%, 11/1/2022 | 1,205,668 | |
1,400M | Matador Resources Co., 6.875%, 4/15/2023 | 1,456,000 | |
MPLX, LP: | |||
800M | 4.5%, 7/15/2023 (a) | 816,687 | |
1,500M | 4.875%, 12/1/2024 | 1,554,027 | |
1,113M | 4.875%, 6/1/2025 | 1,152,022 | |
400M | Murphy Oil Corp., 6.875%, 8/15/2024 | 413,977 | |
1,675M | Newfield Exploration Co., 5.375%, 1/1/2026 | 1,687,563 | |
NuStar Logistics, LP: | |||
325M | 4.8%, 9/1/2020 | 327,438 | |
1,375M | 6.75%, 2/1/2021 | 1,488,438 | |
1,750M | Oasis Petroleum, Inc., 6.5%, 11/1/2021 | 1,680,000 | |
575M | PDC Energy, Inc., 6.125%, 9/15/2024 (a) | 596,563 | |
425M | Parsley Energy, LLC, 6.25%, 6/1/2024 (a) | 440,938 | |
1,775M | QEP Resources, Inc., 6.875%, 3/1/2021 | 1,859,313 | |
1,451M | Range Resources Corp., 5%, 8/15/2022 (a) | 1,451,000 | |
1,650M | Rice Energy, Inc., 6.25%, 5/1/2022 | 1,711,875 | |
Sabine Pass Liquefaction, LLC: | |||
2,825M | 6.25%, 3/15/2022 | 3,100,438 | |
1,375M | 5.625%, 4/15/2023 | 1,474,688 | |
2,625M | 5.75%, 5/15/2024 | 2,838,281 | |
1,225M | 5.625%, 3/1/2025 | 1,321,469 | |
900M | 5.875%, 6/30/2026 (a) | 981,563 |
47 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Energy (continued) | |||
Southwestern Energy Co.: | |||
$ 775M | 5.8%, 1/23/2020 | $ 776,938 | |
2,625M | 6.7%, 1/23/2025 | 2,638,125 | |
1,600M | Sunoco, LP, 6.25%, 4/15/2021 (a) | 1,652,000 | |
Targa Resources Partners, LP: | |||
225M | 5%, 1/15/2018 | 233,438 | |
900M | 5.25%, 5/1/2023 | 915,750 | |
1,650M | 4.25%, 11/15/2023 | 1,602,563 | |
1,150M | 5.125%, 2/1/2025 (a)(b) | 1,154,313 | |
1,150M | 5.375%, 2/1/2027 (a)(b) | 1,160,063 | |
Tesoro Logistics, LP: | |||
675M | 6.25%, 10/15/2022 | 723,938 | |
825M | 6.375%, 5/1/2024 | 888,938 | |
1,550M | Unit Corp., 6.625%, 5/15/2021 | 1,315,562 | |
76,569,290 | |||
Financials—3.0% | |||
1,675M | Albertson Companies, LLC, 5.75%, 3/15/2025 (a) | 1,675,000 | |
Ally Financial, Inc.: | |||
1,300M | 8%, 12/31/2018 | 1,436,500 | |
4,900M | 8%, 3/15/2020 | 5,610,500 | |
2,625M | 8%, 11/1/2031 | 3,248,437 | |
1,200M | Argos Merger Sub, Inc., 7.125%, 3/15/2023 (a) | 1,260,000 | |
1,200M | BCD Acquisition, Inc., 9.625%, 9/15/2023 (a) | 1,260,000 | |
3,466M | Consolidated Energy Finance SA, 6.75%, 10/15/2019 (a) | 3,440,005 | |
1,875M | CVR Partners, LP, 9.25%, 6/15/2023 (a) | 1,821,094 | |
1,000M | Dana Financing Luxembourg, 6.5%, 6/1/2026 (a) | 1,050,500 | |
20,802,036 | |||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—1.2% | |||
1,225M | Barry Callebaut Services SA, 5.5%, 6/15/2023 (a) | 1,340,334 | |
Constellation Brands, Inc.: | |||
525M | 4.25%, 5/1/2023 | 558,469 | |
900M | 4.75%, 11/15/2024 | 978,750 | |
200M | 4.75%, 12/1/2025 | 217,000 | |
1,875M | Post Holdings, Inc., 7.75%, 3/15/2024 (a) | 2,109,375 | |
400M | Smithfield Foods, Inc., 6.625%, 8/15/2022 | 425,000 | |
2,587M | Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.875%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 2,716,350 | |
8,345,278 |
48 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Food/Drug—.5% | ||||
$ 3,125M | Rite Aid Corp., 6.125%, 4/1/2023 (a) | $ 3,384,125 | ||
Forest Products/Containers—3.7% | ||||
Ardagh Packaging Finance, PLC: | ||||
2,175M | 6%, 6/30/2021 (a) | 2,245,687 | ||
525M | 4.625%, 5/15/2023 (a) | 530,250 | ||
1,775M | Ball Corp., 5.25%, 7/1/2025 | 1,919,219 | ||
1,850M | Berry Plastics Group, 5.125%, 7/15/2023 | 1,887,000 | ||
1,400M | CROWN Americas, LLC, 4.5%, 1/15/2023 | 1,459,500 | ||
1,100M | Graphic Packaging International, Inc., 4.875%, 11/15/2022 | 1,157,750 | ||
2,675M | Greif, Inc., 7.75%, 8/1/2019 | 3,016,062 | ||
Mercer International, Inc.: | ||||
300M | 7%, 12/1/2019 | 311,625 | ||
1,400M | 7.75%, 12/1/2022 | 1,489,250 | ||
Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc.: | ||||
450M | 5%, 1/15/2022 (a) | 478,967 | ||
625M | 5.875%, 8/15/2023 (a) | 673,047 | ||
1,875M | 5.375%, 1/15/2025 (a) | 1,957,031 | ||
450M | 6.375%, 8/15/2025 (a) | 496,406 | ||
Sealed Air Corp.: | ||||
375M | 6.5%, 12/1/2020 (a) | 430,781 | ||
875M | 4.875%, 12/1/2022 (a) | 922,031 | ||
2,025M | 5.25%, 4/1/2023 (a) | 2,166,750 | ||
1,550M | 6.875%, 7/15/2033 (a) | 1,670,125 | ||
3,425M | Silgan Holdings, Inc., 5%, 4/1/2020 | 3,519,188 | ||
26,330,669 | ||||
Gaming/Leisure—3.6% | ||||
1,625M | AMC Entertainment, Inc., 5.75%, 6/15/2025 | 1,649,375 | ||
GLP Capital, LP,: | ||||
250M | 4.375%, 4/15/2021 | 263,750 | ||
775M | 5.375%, 4/15/2026 | 835,062 | ||
International Game Technology, PLC: | ||||
900M | 5.625%, 2/15/2020 (a) | 959,625 | ||
900M | 6.25%, 2/15/2022 (a) | 958,500 | ||
1,350M | 6.5%, 2/15/2025 (a) | 1,461,375 | ||
3,825M | Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., 7%, 9/1/2020 (a) | 3,969,130 | ||
875M | MGM Growth Properties Operating Partnership, LP, 5.25%, 8/1/2026 | 910,000 |
49 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Gaming/Leisure (continued) | |||
NCL Corp., Ltd.: | |||
$ 1,900M | 5.25%, 11/15/2019 (a) | $ 1,928,500 | |
1,800M | 4.625%, 11/15/2020 (a) | 1,809,000 | |
1,775M | Regal Entertainment Group, 5.75%, 3/15/2022 | 1,837,125 | |
3,150M | Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., 5.25%, 11/15/2022 | 3,441,375 | |
4,125M | Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 5.25%, 1/15/2021 (a) | 4,260,094 | |
1,000M | Viking Cruises, Ltd., 6.25%, 5/15/2025 (a) | 940,000 | |
25,222,911 | |||
Health Care—9.8% | |||
1,225M | AMN Healthcare, Inc., 5.125%, 10/1/2024 (a)(b) | 1,240,313 | |
Centene Corp.: | |||
2,250M | 5.625%, 2/15/2021 | 2,390,625 | |
1,775M | 6.125%, 2/15/2024 | 1,930,312 | |
Community Health Systems, Inc.: | |||
256M | 5.125%, 8/15/2018 | 258,586 | |
1,400M | 7.125%, 7/15/2020 | 1,308,300 | |
DaVita HealthCare Partners, Inc.: | |||
1,875M | 5.75%, 8/15/2022 | 1,971,094 | |
1,775M | 5.125%, 7/15/2024 | 1,813,828 | |
Endo Finance, LLC: | |||
1,350M | 7.25%, 1/15/2022 (a) | 1,302,750 | |
1,575M | 6%, 7/15/2023 (a) | 1,441,125 | |
375M | 6%, 2/1/2025 (a) | 333,281 | |
Fresenius Medical Care U.S. Finance II, Inc.: | |||
1,150M | 5.625%, 7/31/2019 (a) | 1,252,062 | |
875M | 4.125%, 10/15/2020 (a) | 925,487 | |
675M | 4.75%, 10/15/2024 (a) | 712,125 | |
HCA, Inc.: | |||
3,025M | 6.5%, 2/15/2020 | 3,357,750 | |
3,300M | 6.25%, 2/15/2021 | 3,588,750 | |
175M | 7.5%, 2/15/2022 | 201,250 | |
225M | 5.875%, 5/1/2023 | 240,187 | |
375M | 5.375%, 2/1/2025 | 387,656 | |
2,400M | 5.875%, 2/15/2026 | 2,562,000 | |
HealthSouth Corp.: | |||
1,150M | 5.125%, 3/15/2023 | 1,152,875 | |
1,325M | 5.75%, 11/1/2024 | 1,378,821 | |
1,075M | 5.75%, 9/15/2025 | 1,126,062 | |
2,900M | IMS Health, Inc., 6%, 11/1/2020 (a) | 2,945,313 | |
2,200M | Kindred Healthcare, Inc., 8.75%, 1/15/2023 | 2,208,250 |
50 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Health Care (continued) | |||
LifePoint Health, Inc.: | |||
$ 2,300M | 5.5%, 12/1/2021 | $ 2,403,500 | |
725M | 5.875%, 12/1/2023 | 754,000 | |
1,175M | 5.375%, 5/1/2024 (a) | 1,177,938 | |
Mallinckrodt Finance SB: | |||
775M | 4.875%, 4/15/2020 (a) | 794,375 | |
400M | 5.75%, 8/1/2022 (a) | 396,500 | |
1,025M | 5.5%, 4/15/2025 (a) | 978,875 | |
2,925M | Molina Healthcare, Inc., 5.375%, 11/15/2022 | 3,034,688 | |
775M | MPH Acquisition Holdings, 7.125%, 6/1/2024 (a) | 835,063 | |
3,000M | NBTY, Inc., 7.625%, 5/15/2021 (a) | 3,074,460 | |
700M | RegionalCare Hospital Partners, 8.25%, 5/1/2023 (a) | 724,500 | |
2,275M | Tenet Healthcare Corp., 6%, 10/1/2020 | 2,411,500 | |
675M | Universal Health Services, Inc., 7.625%, 8/15/2020 | 646,313 | |
1,450M | Universal Hospital Services, Inc., 5%, 6/1/2026 (a) | 1,513,438 | |
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.: | |||
5,200M | 6.375%, 10/15/2020 (a) | 4,901,000 | |
1,100M | 5.625%, 12/1/2021 (a) | 987,250 | |
4,600M | 6.125%, 4/15/2025 (a) | 3,973,250 | |
4,225M | WellCare Health Plans, Inc., 5.75%, 11/15/2020 | 4,364,953 | |
69,000,405 | |||
Information Technology—4.1% | |||
1,000M | Anixter, Inc., 5.125%, 10/1/2021 | 1,047,500 | |
2,892M | Belden, Inc., 5.5%, 9/1/2022 (a) | 3,029,370 | |
900M | CEB, Inc., 5.625%, 6/15/2023 (a) | 888,750 | |
2,200M | CommScope Technologies Finance, LLC, 6%, 6/15/2025 (a) | 2,356,750 | |
2,000M | Equinix, Inc., 5.875%, 1/15/2026 | 2,155,000 | |
2,570M | IAC/InterActiveCorp, 4.875%, 11/30/2018 | 2,634,250 | |
Match Group, Inc.: | |||
1,850M | 6.75%, 12/15/2022 | 1,974,875 | |
825M | 6.375%, 6/1/2024 | 900,281 | |
1,850M | Micron Technology, Inc., 7.5%, 9/15/2023 (a) | 2,059,494 | |
1,050M | Microsemi Corp., 9.125%, 4/15/2023 (a) | 1,202,250 | |
1,250M | MSCI, Inc., 5.75%, 8/15/2025 (a) | 1,340,625 | |
1,375M | Nuance Communications, Inc., 6%, 7/1/2024 (a) | 1,436,875 |
51 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Information Technology (continued) | |||
NXP BV: | |||
$ 875M | 4.125%, 6/1/2021 (a) | $ 939,531 | |
2,850M | 3.875%, 9/1/2022 (a) | 2,992,500 | |
1,300M | Open Text Corp., 5.625%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 1,332,500 | |
2,125M | Western Digital Corp., 10.5%, 4/1/2024 (a) | 2,470,313 | |
28,760,864 | |||
Manufacturing—2.6% | |||
2,300M | Amkor Technology, Inc., 6.375%, 10/1/2022 | 2,383,375 | |
1,675M | ATS Automation Tooling Systems, Inc., 6.5%, 6/15/2023 (a) | 1,721,063 | |
700M | Boise Cascade Co., 5.625%, 9/1/2024 (a) | 714,000 | |
2,775M | Brand Energy & Infrastructure Services, Inc., 8.5%, 12/1/2021 (a) | 2,788,875 | |
475M | Cloud Crane, LLC, 10.125%, 8/1/2024 (a) | 494,000 | |
2,450M | Dematic SA, 7.75%, 12/15/2020 (a) | 2,566,375 | |
200M | EDP Finance BV, 5.25%, 1/14/2021 (a) | 216,878 | |
3,075M | H&E Equipment Services, Inc., 7%, 9/1/2022 | 3,259,500 | |
550M | Rexel SA, 5.25%, 6/15/2020 (a) | 573,609 | |
1,225M | Sensata Technologies U.K. Financing Co., 6.25%, 2/15/2026 (a) | 1,332,188 | |
2,050M | Zekelman Industries, Inc., 9.875%, 6/15/2023 (a) | 2,167,875 | |
18,217,738 | |||
Media-Broadcasting—2.7% | |||
Belo Corp.: | |||
725M | 7.75%, 6/1/2027 | 786,625 | |
150M | 7.25%, 9/15/2027 | 159,750 | |
2,225M | LIN Television Corp., 5.875%, 11/15/2022 | 2,341,813 | |
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.: | |||
1,700M | 6.875%, 11/15/2020 | 1,770,125 | |
1,525M | 6.125%, 2/15/2022 (a) | 1,582,188 | |
1,350M | 5.625%, 8/1/2024 (a) | 1,356,750 | |
Sinclair Television Group, Inc.: | |||
4,075M | 5.375%, 4/1/2021 | 4,232,906 | |
1,575M | 5.125%, 2/15/2027 (a) | 1,543,500 | |
Sirius XM Radio, Inc.: | |||
4,050M | 5.75%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 4,241,464 | |
625M | 6%, 7/15/2024 (a) | 667,969 | |
18,683,090 |
52 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Media-Cable TV—7.7% | |||
Altice Financing SA: | |||
$ 2,525M | 6.625%, 2/15/2023 (a) | $ 2,600,750 | |
2,300M | 5.375%, 7/15/2023 (a) | 2,386,250 | |
970M | 8.125%, 1/15/2024 (a) | 1,008,800 | |
275M | 7.625%, 2/15/2025 (a) | 277,406 | |
1,000M | 5.5%, 5/15/2026 (a) | 1,030,000 | |
1,150M | 7.5%, 5/15/2026 (a) | 1,200,312 | |
1,625M | Cable One, Inc., 5.75%, 6/15/2022 (a) | 1,702,187 | |
CCO Holdings, LLC: | |||
2,950M | 5.125%, 2/15/2023 | 3,082,750 | |
3,675M | 5.875%, 4/1/2024 (a) | 3,930,045 | |
2,325M | 5.875%, 5/1/2027 (a) | 2,481,937 | |
Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, | |||
4,525M | 6.375%, 9/15/2020 (a) | 4,677,719 | |
1,700M | 7.75%, 7/15/2025 (a) | 1,844,500 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc.: | |||
200M | 7.625%, 3/15/2020 Series “A” | 193,000 | |
4,300M | 7.625%, 3/15/2020 Series “B” | 4,283,875 | |
750M | 6.5%, 11/15/2022 Series “A” | 759,375 | |
3,050M | CSC Holdings, LLC, 6.75%, 11/15/2021 | 3,233,000 | |
DISH DBS Corp.: | |||
4,750M | 7.875%, 9/1/2019 | 5,331,875 | |
950M | 5%, 3/15/2023 | 926,250 | |
1,750M | 5.875%, 11/15/2024 | 1,734,687 | |
725M | 7.75%, 7/1/2026 (a) | 772,125 | |
Gray Television, Inc.: | |||
3,025M | 7.5%, 10/1/2020 | 3,141,659 | |
1,700M | 5.875%, 7/15/2026 (a) | 1,717,000 | |
1,050M | Lynx II Corp., 6.375%, 4/15/2023 (a) | 1,107,750 | |
Midcontinent Communications & Finance Corp.: | |||
2,250M | 6.25%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 2,368,125 | |
600M | 6.875%, 8/15/2023 (a) | 642,000 | |
Numericable Group SA: | |||
1,575M | 6%, 5/15/2022 (a) | 1,612,406 | |
600M | 6.25%, 5/15/2024 (a) | 598,321 | |
54,644,104 |
53 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Media-Diversified—1.5% | |||
$ 1,700M | Clearwater Paper Corp., 4.5%, 2/1/2023 | $ 1,710,625 | |
1,700M | Gannett Co., Inc., 5.125%, 7/15/2020 | 1,757,375 | |
2,025M | LSC Communication, Inc, 8.75%, 10/15/2023 (a) | 2,025,000 | |
625M | Lamar Media Corp., 5.75%, 2/1/2026 | 675,781 | |
2,775M | Tribune Co., 5.875%, 7/15/2022 | 2,821,828 | |
1,290M | Trinseo SA, 6.75%, 5/1/2022 (a) | 1,367,400 | |
10,358,009 | |||
Metals/Mining—5.5% | |||
Alcoa, Inc.: | |||
2,325M | 6.15%, 8/15/2020 | 2,572,031 | |
225M | 5.95%, 2/1/2037 | 227,362 | |
Alcoa Nederland Holding BV: | |||
1,775M | 6.75%, 9/30/2024 (a) | 1,848,219 | |
725M | 7%, 9/30/2026 (a) | 751,281 | |
Aleris International, Inc.: | |||
1,440M | 7.875%, 11/1/2020 | 1,465,200 | |
1,325M | 9.5%, 4/1/2021 (a) | 1,431,000 | |
ArcelorMittal: | |||
1,700M | 6.125%, 6/1/2018 | 1,810,500 | |
1,681M | 10.85%, 6/1/2019 | 2,042,415 | |
2,000M | 6.25%, 8/5/2020 | 2,185,000 | |
525M | 6.5%, 3/1/2021 | 586,687 | |
1,125M | 8%, 10/15/2039 | 1,220,625 | |
325M | 7.75%, 3/1/2041 | 340,437 | |
675M | Bluescope Steel, Ltd., 6.5%, 5/15/2021 (a) | 715,500 | |
1,725M | Commercial Metals Co., 4.875%, 5/15/2023 | 1,720,687 | |
1,025M | Constellium NV, 7.875%, 4/1/2021 (a) | 1,096,750 | |
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.: | |||
1,850M | 2.375%, 3/15/2018 | 1,831,500 | |
2,450M | 3.1%, 3/15/2020 | 2,358,125 | |
1,400M | 5.45%, 3/15/2043 | 1,130,500 | |
1,875M | Glencore Funding, LLC, 3.125%, 4/29/2019 (a) | 1,888,125 | |
1,250M | Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc., 11%, 5/15/2022 (a) | 1,378,125 | |
325M | Kaiser Aluminum Corp., 5.875%, 5/15/2024 | 340,437 | |
Novelis, Inc.: | |||
2,750M | 6.25%, 8/15/2024 (a) | 2,925,313 | |
1,675M | 5.875%, 9/30/2026 (a) | 1,718,969 |
54 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Metals/Mining (continued) | |||
Steel Dynamics, Inc.: | |||
$ 1,325M | 5.125%, 10/1/2021 | $ 1,382,969 | |
675M | 6.375%, 8/15/2022 | 713,813 | |
1,000M | 5.5%, 10/1/2024 | 1,050,000 | |
2,150M | Teck Resources, Ltd., 6%, 8/15/2040 | 1,994,125 | |
38,725,695 | |||
Real Estate—2.6% | |||
1,500M | Care Capital Properties, LP, 5.125%, 8/15/2026 (a) | 1,502,631 | |
1,950M | Dupont Fabros Technology, LP, 5.625%, 6/15/2023 | 2,057,250 | |
Geo Group, Inc.: | |||
1,450M | 5.875%, 1/15/2022 | 1,312,250 | |
400M | 5.125%, 4/1/2023 | 342,000 | |
950M | 5.875%, 10/15/2024 | 821,750 | |
1,575M | 6%, 4/15/2026 | 1,346,625 | |
Iron Mountain, Inc.: | |||
2,925M | 6%, 8/15/2023 | 3,137,062 | |
2,875M | 5.75%, 8/15/2024 | 2,968,437 | |
Lennar Corp.: | |||
1,350M | 4.875%, 12/15/2023 | 1,390,500 | |
1,075M | 4.75%, 4/1/2021 | 1,150,250 | |
375M | MPT Operating Partnership, LP, 6.375%, 3/1/2024 | 408,750 | |
1,100M | Realogy Group/Co-Issuer, 5.25%, 12/1/2021 (a) | 1,162,902 | |
500M | Vereit Operating Partnership, LP, 4.875%, 6/1/2026 | 530,000 | |
18,130,407 | |||
Retail-General Merchandise—1.6% | |||
KFC Holding Co.: | |||
1,075M | 5%, 6/1/2024 (a) | 1,126,062 | |
1,325M | 5.25%, 6/1/2026 (a) | 1,404,500 | |
L Brands, Inc.: | |||
1,700M | 6.875%, 11/1/2035 | 1,861,500 | |
3,125M | 6.75%, 7/1/2036 | 3,376,937 | |
850M | Landry’s, Inc., 6.75%, 10/15/2024 (a)(b) | 867,000 | |
225M | Limited Brands, Inc., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 263,813 | |
875M | Netflix, Inc., 5.5%, 2/15/2022 | 946,094 | |
1,450M | Party City Holdings, Inc., 6.125%, 8/15/2023 (a) | 1,553,313 | |
11,399,219 |
55 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Services—2.1% | |||
$ 1,900M | ADT Corp., 3.5%, 7/15/2022 | $ 1,838,250 | |
AECOM: | |||
1,975M | 5.75%, 10/15/2022 | 2,084,237 | |
2,025M | 5.875%, 10/15/2024 | 2,171,812 | |
825M | Aramark Services, Inc., 5.125%, 1/15/2024 | 860,062 | |
2,125M | Ashtead Capital, Inc., 6.5%, 7/15/2022 (a) | 2,244,531 | |
1,725M | Monitronics International, Inc., 9.125%, 4/1/2020 | 1,630,125 | |
1,700M | Prime Security Services Borrower, LLC, 9.25%, 5/15/2023 (a) | 1,857,250 | |
2,300M | Reliance Intermediate Holdings, LP, 6.5%, 4/1/2023 (a) | 2,426,500 | |
15,112,767 | |||
Telecommunications—3.2% | |||
CenturyLink, Inc.: | |||
4,475M | 5.8%, 3/15/2022 | 4,603,656 | |
1,250M | 6.75%, 12/1/2023 | 1,304,688 | |
1,400M | Citizens Communications Co., 9%, 8/15/2031 | 1,295,000 | |
Frontier Communications Corp.: | |||
525M | 7.125%, 1/15/2023 | 492,187 | |
3,225M | 11%, 9/15/2025 | 3,378,187 | |
2,623M | GCI, Inc., 6.75%, 6/1/2021 | 2,707,592 | |
Wind Acquisition Finance SA: | |||
2,000M | 4.75%, 7/15/2020 (a) | 2,025,000 | |
4,975M | 7.375%, 4/23/2021 (a) | 5,211,312 | |
1,925M | Windstream Services, LLC, 7.5%, 6/1/2022 | 1,857,625 | |
22,875,247 | |||
Transportation—.8% | |||
Aircastle, Ltd.: | |||
550M | 4.625%, 12/15/2018 | 574,750 | |
1,537M | 6.25%, 12/1/2019 | 1,686,857 | |
1,375M | Fly Leasing, Ltd., 6.75%, 12/15/2020 | 1,421,406 | |
1,100M | Mobile Mini, Inc., 5.875%, 7/1/2024 | 1,149,500 | |
625M | XPO Logistics, Inc., 6.125%, 9/1/2023 (a) | 642,188 | |
5,474,701 |
56 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Utilities—3.4% | |||
AES Corp.: | |||
$ 525M | 8%, 6/1/2020 | $ 620,812 | |
2,525M | 7.375%, 7/1/2021 | 2,910,062 | |
1,700M | 5.5%, 3/15/2024 | 1,777,555 | |
1,075M | 6%, 5/15/2026 | 1,138,156 | |
Calpine Corp.: | |||
1,100M | 5.375%, 1/15/2023 | 1,101,375 | |
600M | 5.75%, 1/15/2025 | 594,750 | |
Dynegy, Inc.: | |||
700M | 6.75%, 11/1/2019 | 721,000 | |
2,100M | 7.375%, 11/1/2022 | 2,084,250 | |
1,408M | FirstLight Hydro Generating, 8.812%, 10/15/2026 | 1,476,343 | |
472M | Indiantown Cogeneration Utilities, LP, 9.77%, 12/15/2020 | 510,171 | |
975M | InterGen NV, 7%, 6/30/2023 (a) | 828,750 | |
NRG Energy, Inc.: | |||
525M | 6.25%, 7/15/2022 | 535,500 | |
650M | 7.25%, 5/15/2026 (a) | 664,625 | |
1,600M | 6.625%, 1/15/2027 (a) | 1,570,000 | |
1,350M | NRG Yield, Inc., 5%, 9/15/2026 (a) | 1,326,375 | |
2,657M | NSG Holdings, LLC, 7.75%, 12/15/2025 (a) | 2,869,300 | |
3,650M | Talen Energy Supply, LLC, 4.625%, 7/15/2019 (a) | 3,449,250 | |
24,178,274 | |||
Waste Management—.3% | |||
2,050M | ADS Waste Holdings, Inc., 8.25%, 10/1/2020 | 2,155,062 | |
Wireless Communications—5.3% | |||
Hughes Satelite Systems Corp.: | |||
625M | 5.25%, 8/1/2026 (a) | 618,750 | |
950M | 6.625%, 8/1/2026 (a) | 919,125 | |
Inmarsat Finance, PLC: | |||
775M | 4.875%, 5/15/2022 (a) | 740,125 | |
1,225M | 6.5%, 10/1/2024 (a) | 1,231,125 | |
1,375M | Intelsat Jackson Holdings SA, 8%, 2/15/2024 (a) | 1,385,311 | |
Level 3 Financing, Inc.: | |||
1,138M | 6.125%, 1/15/2021 | 1,182,098 | |
575M | 5.125%, 5/1/2023 | 594,406 | |
1,750M | MetroPCS Wireless, Inc., 6.625%, 11/15/2020 | 1,800,313 | |
Neptune Finco Corp.: | |||
2,925M | 10.125%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 3,378,375 | |
1,250M | 6.625%, 10/15/2025 (a) | 1,359,375 | |
650M | 10.875%, 10/15/2025 (a) | 762,125 |
57 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Wireless Communications (continued) | |||
$ 1,200M | SBA Communications Corp., 4.875%, 9/1/2024 (a) | $ 1,212,000 | |
Sprint Communications, Inc.: | |||
1,450M | 9%, 11/15/2018 (a) | 1,605,874 | |
1,225M | 7%, 3/1/2020 (a) | 1,319,937 | |
Sprint Nextel Corp.: | |||
6,825M | 7%, 8/15/2020 | 6,893,250 | |
4,350M | 6%, 11/15/2022 | 4,056,377 | |
T-Mobile USA, Inc.: | |||
4,625M | 6.25%, 4/1/2021 | 4,870,703 | |
625M | 6.125%, 1/15/2022 | 666,407 | |
2,725M | 6.625%, 4/1/2023 | 2,936,187 | |
37,531,863 | |||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $585,968,255) | 607,685,077 | ||
LOAN PARTICIPATIONS†—9.2% | |||
Automotive—.5% | |||
1,491M | CS Intermediate Holdco 2, LLC, 4%, 4/4/2021 | 1,498,840 | |
1,700M | Federal-Mogul Corp., 4%, 4/15/2018 | 1,683,709 | |
3,182,549 | |||
Building Materials—.3% | |||
2,188M | Builders FirstSource, Inc., 4.75%, 7/31/2022 | 2,203,233 | |
Energy—.3% | |||
2,225M | Jonah Energy, LLC, 7.5%, 5/12/2021 | 2,008,063 | |
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—.0% | |||
275M | Chobani, LLC, 5.25%, 9/29/2023 (c) | 273,625 | |
Food/Drug—1.0% | |||
Albertson’s, LLC: | |||
1,474M | 4.75%, 6/22/2023 | 1,489,742 | |
1,965M | 4.75%, 12/21/2022 | 1,985,813 | |
3,215M | Rite Aid Corp., 4.875%, 6/21/2021 | 3,225,047 | |
6,700,602 | |||
Gaming/Leisure—.2% | |||
1,519M | Seminole Hard Rock Entertainment, Inc., 3.5877%, 5/14/2020 | 1,524,671 |
58 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Health Care—.9% | |||
Community Health Systems, Inc.: | |||
$ 598M | 3.75%, 12/31/2019 | $ 587,823 | |
1,101M | 4%, 1/27/2021 | 1,083,413 | |
3,436M | ConvaTec, Inc., 4.25%, 6/15/2020 | 3,453,605 | |
1,440M | ExamWorks Group, Inc., 4.75%, 7/27/2023 | 1,452,600 | |
6,577,441 | |||
Information Technology—2.3% | |||
3,340M | Avago Technologies Cayman, Ltd., 3.5243%, 2/1/2023 | 3,381,608 | |
3,400M | Avast Software BV, 5%, 8/3/2022 (b) | 3,417,000 | |
1,995M | Dell International, LLC, 4%, 9/7/2023 (b) | 2,008,895 | |
3,400M | Dell Software, Inc., 7%, 10/8/2022 (b) | 3,375,208 | |
3,242M | Global Payments, Inc., 4.0244%, 4/22/2023 | 3,279,698 | |
1,085M | Match Group, Inc., 5.5%, 11/16/2022 | 1,091,467 | |
16,553,876 | |||
Media-Broadcasting—.1% | |||
625M | Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., 3%, 9/26/2023 (b) | 628,906 | |
Media-CableTV—.5% | |||
3,491M | CSC Holdings, LLC, 5%, 10/9/2024 | 3,511,614 | |
Media-Diversified—.5% | |||
3,113M | Tribune Media Co., 3.75%, 12/27/2020 | 3,146,512 | |
Retail-General Merchandise—.9% | |||
3,400M | Harbor Freight Tools USA, 4%, 8/18/2023 | 3,424,793 | |
3,070M | Restaurant Brands, Inc., 3.75%, 12/10/2021 | 3,093,966 | |
6,518,759 | |||
Services—.6% | |||
594M | Brickman Group, Ltd., LLC, 4%, 12/18/2020 | 592,963 | |
3,300M | Safway Group Holding, LLC, 5.75%, 8/4/2023 | 3,327,499 | |
3,920,462 | |||
Telecommunications—.2% | |||
1,650M | Telenet Group Holding, 4.25%, 5/3/2024 | 1,667,017 |
59 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Transportation—.1% | |||||||
$ 549M | XPO Logistics, Inc., 4.25%, 11/1/2021 | $ 552,482 | |||||
Utilities—.5% | |||||||
2,543M | Calpine Corp., 3.59%, 5/27/2022 | 2,552,348 | |||||
1,175M | Dayton Power & Light Co., 4%, 8/24/2022 | 1,191,156 | |||||
3,743,504 | |||||||
Wireless Communications—.3% | |||||||
1,850M | Intelsat Jackson Holdings, Ltd, 3.75%, 6/30/2019 | 1,761,548 | |||||
Total Value of Loan Participations (cost $63,969,014) | 64,474,864 | ||||||
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES—.6% | |||||||
Transportation | |||||||
4,140M | American Airlines 13-2 B PTT, 5.6%, 1/15/2022 | ||||||
(cost $4,213,173) (a) | 4,336,739 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—2.1% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
10,000M | 0.295%, 10/21/2016 | 9,999,100 | |||||
5,000M | 0.285%, 11/8/2016 | 4,998,950 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations | |||||||
(cost $14,996,856) | 14,998,050 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $669,147,298) | 98.2 | % | 691,494,730 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.8 | 12,994,355 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $704,489,085 |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). | |
(b) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis (see | |
Note 1G). | ||
(c) | Security valued at fair value (see Note 1A) | |
† | Interest rates are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates above are the rates in effect | |
at September 30, 2016. | ||
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
PTT | Pass-Through Trust |
60 |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | $ | — | $ | 607,685,077 | $ | — | $ | 607,685,077 | ||||
Loan Participations | — | 64,474,864 | — | 64,474,864 | ||||||||
Pass-Through Certificates | — | 4,336,739 | — | 4,336,739 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 14,998,050 | — | 14,998,050 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | — | $ | 691,494,730 | $ | — | $ | 691,494,730 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization of corporate bonds, |
loan participations and pass-through certificates. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
61 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2016
The dollar weighted average of credit ratings of all bonds held by the Fund during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, computed on a monthly basis, are set forth below. This information reflects the average composition of the Fund’s assets during the 2016 fiscal year and is not necessarily representative of the Fund as of the end of its 2016 fiscal year, the current fiscal year or at any other time in the future.
Comparable Quality of | ||
Rated by | Unrated Securities to | |
Moody’s | Bonds Rated by Moody’s | |
Aaa | 0.65% | 0.00% |
Baa1 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Baa2 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
Baa3 | 1.87 | 0.00 |
Ba1 | 8.31 | 0.00 |
Ba2 | 15.22 | 0.00 |
Ba3 | 19.00 | 0.00 |
BBB– | 0.00 | 0.71 |
BB+ | 0.00 | 0.13 |
BB | 0.00 | 0.39 |
BB– | 0.00 | 0.45 |
B+ | 0.00 | 0.58 |
B | 0.00 | 0.65 |
B- | 0.00 | 0.01 |
B1 | 20.54 | 0.00 |
B2 | 11.18 | 0.00 |
B3 | 16.55 | 0.00 |
Caa1 | 5.05 | 0.00 |
Caa2 | 0.64 | 0.00 |
Caa | 0.73 | 0.00 |
P–1 | 0.06 | 0.00 |
62 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
GOVERNMENT FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Government Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 2.16% for Class A shares, 1.38% for Class B shares, 2.50% for Advisor Class shares, 2.62% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 21.2 cents per share on Class A shares, 11.8 cents per share on Class B shares, 23.8 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 26.1 cents per share on Institutional Class shares.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell-off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4%, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international bonds fell into negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
63 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
The Bond Market
All major fixed income markets were positive for the past 12 months ending September 30th. The U.S. bond market (measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index) gained 5.26%.
Treasuries (measured by the BofA ML US Treasury Index) returned 4.33% during the review period. They did especially well during the first half of 2016 when they were boosted by declining interest rates and aggressive ECB easing. Longer-dated bonds sig-nificantly outperformed with 15+ year Treasuries gaining as much as 13.34% during the review period.
The Treasury yield curve flattened with short-term yields rising and long-term yields declining. The 2-year Treasury yield, which is very sensitive to changes in Fed policy, rose 13 basis points from 0.63% as of 9/30/2015 to 0.76% as of 9/30/2016. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield fell 44 basis points from 2.04% to 1.60%. The route of Treasury yields was very much influenced by the market’s expectations of actions and comments from central banks. Treasury yields reached their highest level of the review period during the end of 2015, when the market was pricing in the possibility that the Fed might raise interest rates four times in 2016. On the other hand, yields bottomed early in July on speculations that soft global growth would encourage major central banks to support economies with stimulus efforts, including continued low interest rates. The 2-year yield fell to 0.55% while the 10-year yield fell to a new all-time record low of 1.36%. There is an inverse relationship between bond prices and yield changes.
Municipal bonds (measured by the BofA ML Municipal Master Index) returned 5.58%, with the majority of this return happening during the first nine months of the review period. Despite elevated issuance, strong demand from investors looking for yield was a major factor in municipal bond market performance.
Investment grade corporate bonds (measured by the BofA ML Corporate Master Index) posted a strong return of 8.50% for the review period, with the majority of this return occurring between January and August. Low global interest rates and uncertainty caused by the Brexit vote helped this sector perform well as many fixed income investors looked to U.S. markets as a safe haven. In addition, investment grade corporate bonds benefited from the ECB’s corporate bond-buying program, as demand increased for this asset class.
The high yield bond market (measured by the BofA ML HY Cash Pay Constrained Index) showed strong overall performance of 12.80%. Demand for high yield bonds benefited from investors searching for income. This sector also benefited from a rebound in oil prices. The lowest rated high yield bonds (CCC-rated) were the best performers, gaining 18.05%. However, they also experienced the widest swings; they struggled much more during risk-off periods, while significantly outperforming during risk-on periods.
64 |
International fixed income posted strong overall returns, supported by falling yields. Non-U.S. sovereign bonds (measured by Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index) were up 12.61%. Emerging markets (measured by the BofA ML Global Emerging Markets Sovereign Index) outperformed with a return of 17.50%. At the end of the review period there was about $9.3 trillion negative-yielding government debt instruments in the world, all of them outside the United States. This represents 37% of the Bloomberg Global Developed Sovereign Bond Index and 51% of the all non-U.S. sovereign bonds in the Index.
The Fund
The broad mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) market returned 3.66%. The agency MBS sector underperformed Treasury securities during the period under review, as lower interest rates resulted in more borrowers being able to refinance their mortgages thus increasing prepayment risk within the sector.
Within the MBS market, 30-year Ginnie Mae (“GNMA”) mortgages returned 3.5% and 30-year Fannie Mae mortgages returned 3.75%, thus outperforming their GNMA counterparts as GNMA securities experienced faster prepayment speeds during the period under review. Lower-coupon agency MBS outperformed higher coupon agency MBS as investors favored lower-coupon agency MBS over higher coupons, as lower coupons offered investors higher yields because they are less susceptible to prepayment risk during periods of declining interest rates.
The Fund underperformed its benchmark, the Citigroup Government and Mortgage Index, during the period under review. Three main factors contributed to the Fund’s underperformance. First, the Fund was underweight in Treasury securities and had less exposure to Treasury maturities 10 years and longer. Second, the Fund was underweight with the 30-year lower coupon agency MBS and overweight with the 30-year higher coupon agency MBS, especially GNMA securities. Lastly, the Fund’s shorter effective duration had a negative impact on performance as interest rates decreased during the period under review.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
65 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GOVERNMENT FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.06% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,011.44 | $5.33 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.70 | $5.35 | |
Class B Shares | 1.88% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,007.18 | $9.43 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.60 | $9.47 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.76% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,012.73 | $3.82 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.20 | $3.84 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.64% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,013.77 | $3.22 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.80 | $3.23 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total value of investments. |
66 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GOVERNMENT FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Government Fund (Class A shares) and the Citigroup U.S. Government/Mortgage Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Government Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/06 with a theoretical investment in the Citigroup U.S. Government/Mortgage Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged index that is a combination of the Citigroup U.S. Government Index and the Citigroup Mortgage Index. The Citigroup U.S. Government Index tracks the performance of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored indices within the Citigroup U.S. Broad Investment Grade Bond Index. The Citigroup Mortgage Index tracks the performance of the
67 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
mortgage component of the Citigroup U.S. Broad Investment Grade Bond Index, which is comprised of 30- and 15-year GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pass-throughs and FNMA and FHLMC balloon mortgages. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (3.81)%, (0.07)% and 2.81%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 0.61%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (2.73)%, (0.04)% and 2.76%, respectively, and t he S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been (0.19)%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 2.39% and 1.17%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 0.97%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 2.51% and 1.45%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 1.15%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Citigroup and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
*** The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2016.
† The Index return is for ten years. The Index return since inception of the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares is 2.47%.
68 |
Portfolio of Investments
GOVERNMENT FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | |||
SECURITIES—56.2% | |||
Fannie Mae—39.5% | |||
$45,275M | 3%, 12/1/2028 – 10/13/2046 (a) | $ 47,313,277 | |
36,411M | 3.5%, 4/1/2033 – 4/1/2046 (a) | 38,622,704 | |
30,207M | 4%, 8/1/2026 – 11/1/2045 | 32,572,385 | |
7,027M | 4.5%, 11/1/2040 – 1/1/2042 | 7,778,603 | |
2,467M | 5%, 8/1/2039 – 11/1/2039 | 2,751,992 | |
2,216M | 5.5%, 7/1/2033 – 10/1/2039 | 2,555,219 | |
131,594,180 | |||
Freddie Mac—2.9% | |||
404M | 3%, 6/1/2021 | 424,516 | |
7,060M | 3.5%, 9/1/2032 – 2/1/2046 | 7,500,293 | |
1,365M | 5%, 8/1/2039 | 1,551,765 | |
9,476,574 | |||
Government National Mortgage Association I | |||
Program—13.8% | |||
1,644M | 4%, 11/15/2025 – 6/15/2042 | 1,790,614 | |
8,628M | 4.5%, 9/15/2033 – 6/15/2040 | 9,651,120 | |
9,867M | 5%, 6/15/2033 – 4/15/2040 | 11,205,197 | |
9,274M | 5.5%, 3/15/2033 – 10/15/2039 | 10,690,036 | |
9,492M | 6%, 2/15/2032 – 4/15/2040 | 11,121,417 | |
1,478M | 7%, 6/15/2023 – 4/15/2034 | 1,612,159 | |
46,070,543 | |||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $181,284,889) | 187,141,297 | ||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—22.1% | |||
U.S. Treasury Notes: | |||
5,000M | 1.125%, 8/31/2021 | 4,995,510 | |
13,230M | 1.375%, 10/31/2020 | 13,386,326 | |
5,100M | 1.5%, 3/31/2023 | 5,137,153 | |
21,400M | 1.625%, 2/15/2026 | 21,441,388 | |
12,310M | 1.875%, 8/31/2022 | 12,704,782 | |
4,510M | 2%, 2/15/2025 | 4,671,196 | |
10,980M | 2.5%, 5/15/2046 | 11,364,728 | |
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $72,613,389) | 73,701,083 |
69 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | |||
SECURITIES—9.3% | |||
Fannie Mae—6.4% | |||
$ 2,797M | 2.27%, 1/1/2023 | $ 2,886,298 | |
4,800M | 2.4994%, 9/25/2026 | 4,888,752 | |
1,300M | 2.96%, 11/1/2018 | 1,343,251 | |
4,431M | 2.996%, 11/1/2022 | 4,712,116 | |
2,836M | 3.76%, 4/1/2018 | 2,912,745 | |
4,500M | 3.84%, 5/1/2018 | 4,637,182 | |
21,380,344 | |||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation—2.9% | |||
Multi-Family Structured Pass-Through: | |||
4,330M | 2.849%, 3/25/2026 | 4,546,600 | |
4,700M | 3.08%, 1/25/2031 | 5,077,325 | |
9,623,925 | |||
Total Value of Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $31,151,539) | 31,004,269 | ||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||
OBLIGATIONS—6.9% | |||
Fannie Mae: | |||
6,600M | 1.125%, 7/20/2018 | 6,634,267 | |
1,700M | 1.375%, 2/26/2021 | 1,712,305 | |
4,300M | 1.875%, 9/18/2018 | 4,388,584 | |
4,750M | 1.875%, 9/24/2026 | 4,732,601 | |
5,000M | Freddie Mac, 3.75%, 3/27/2019 | 5,346,305 | |
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $22,805,024) | 22,814,062 | ||
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE | |||
OBLIGATIONS—4.4% | |||
Fannie Mae: | |||
5,288M | 3%, 2/25/2024 | 5,487,389 | |
6,177M | 4%, 2/25/2025 | 6,724,174 | |
2,225M | Freddie Mac, 3%, 8/15/2039 | 2,278,109 | |
Total Value of Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (cost $14,517,825) | 14,489,672 |
70 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—3.0% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$ 5,000M | 0.295%, 10/21/2016 | $ 4,999,550 | |||||
5,000M | 0.285%, 11/8/2016 | 4,998,950 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations | |||||||
(cost $9,997,676) | 9,998,500 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $332,370,342) | 101.9 | % | 339,148,883 | ||||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (1.9 | ) | (6,221,626) | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $332,927,257 |
(a) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis (see |
Note 1G). |
71 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
September 30, 2016
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | $ | — | $ | 187,141,297 | $ | — | $ | 187,141,297 | ||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 73,701,083 | — | 73,701,083 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 31,004,269 | — | 31,004,269 | ||||||||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 22,814,062 | — | 22,814,062 | ||||||||
Collateralized Mortgage | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 14,489,672 | — | 14,489,672 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 9,998,500 | — | 9,998,500 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 339,148,883 | $ | — | $ | 339,148,883 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
72 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors International Opportunities Bond Fund for the year ended September 30, 2016. During the period the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 8.30% for Class A shares, 8.70% for Advisor Class shares and 8.85% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 12.6 cents per share on Class A shares, 13.1 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 13.6 cents per share for Institutional Class shares.
The Fund faced many headwinds to performance during the fourth quarter of 2015 and heading into 2016; several of these factors stemmed from questions surrounding China’s economic viability. The perfect storm of deteriorating economic conditions materialized in China—the precipitous drop in Chinese equities, overheated real estate and credit markets, ineffective fiscal policy, and a slowdown in the Industrials sector. These domestic issues had far-reaching consequences that reverberated throughout global capital markets. We had expected the global economy to reflate in 2015 and instead, the combination of a strong dollar and weak Chinese growth created a global disinflationary environment at a time when many developed market central banks already could not reach their respective inflation targets. Commodity prices fell sharply alongside the drop in Chinese demand for raw materials. Investors responded to this environment by piling into “safe-haven” assets and shedding risk assets such as equities and emerging markets. The effects of the risk-off environment were the most significant headwinds to performance. Currency positions were the greatest detractors to performance during the period.
The Fund’s lack of exposure to the Japanese yen and Japanese Government Bonds (“JGBs”) were the largest detractors to relative performance. The Fund did not own these Japanese assets because we believed them to be overvalued on a relative basis—a conviction we still hold. Despite a volatile January, the first two quarters of 2016 were relatively placid from a volatility perspective. However, June 23, 2016, became a watershed moment as the U.K. populace voted to exit the European Union, colloquially known as “Brexit.” Our position in British pound sterling was a detractor for the period as the referendum sent the currency to multi-decade lows; however, we believe the weaker currency will aid the U.K.’s terms of trade. Therefore, we added to our sterling position following the vote. The referendum results also sent high-quality sovereign yields to new lows—with longer-term German Bund and JGB yields falling into negative territory. Although the initial shock of Brexit wore off and risk assets recovered, we still could not justify the irrationality of negative-yielding bonds, or the notion of “overpaying for safety.” The lack of exposure to ultra-high quality European bonds detracted from performance. As a fixed income manager, we are interested in inflation-adjusted yields and getting paid an attractive coupon, so our focus has been and continues to
73 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
be select emerging market countries that offer a mix of attractive bonds and currency valuations. Brazil and Indonesia illustrate these types of opportunities, as we own the bonds and currencies for both of these countries. These positions were also two of the largest contributors to relative performance for the period. Although Australia is a developed market country, its bonds and currency are both attractively valued and offer better real yields compared to peers. Australia also exhibited signs of sustainable economic growth, backed by sound fiscal and monetary policymaking. Our position in the Australian dollar and sovereign bonds was also a leading contributor to performance.
We also saw signs of improving economic conditions in Mexico, such as the liberalization of its state-controlled oil industry, stabilizing crude oil prices, and the correlation with U.S. economic growth. Despite these positive factors, the Mexican economy’s failure to launch remained an outlier to our emerging market growth thesis. While Mexican Bonos generated positive performance for the Fund, unhedged exposure to the Mexican peso was a significant detractor to performance. We believe the peso’s use as a proxy for short sellers and emerging markets is partly responsible for the currency’s volatility. The rise in protectionism, the future of multilateral trade agreements, and a general slowdown in global trade have also had deleterious effects on the peso.
Looking ahead, much of our thesis heading into 2017 remains the same: we believe the U.S. dollar will fall, commodity prices will rise, emerging market currencies will then rise, emerging market rates will fall, and we will end a vicious cycle and begin a virtuous cycle of lower rates and better growth in the emerging market space. This strategy has worked well and has tested our mettle with the recent extreme rise in political uncertainty. We took advantage of this uncertainty to fade bonds in the developed world, leaving the Fund with few investments in core Europe and none in Japan. Our strategy has shifted around the theme of “something is stirring” in the global economy. If this theme plays out, as we expect it will, our current positioning should do much better than the benchmark.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
74 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.41% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,015.44 | $7.10 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,017.95 | $7.11 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.10% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,017.60 | $5.55 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.50 | $5.55 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.96% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,018.64 | $4.84 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.20 | $4.85 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total value of investments. |
75 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Opportunities Bond Fund (Class A shares) and the Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index (Unhedged).
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Opportunities Bond Fund (Class A shares) beginning 8/20/12 (commencement of operations) with a theoretical investment in the Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index (Unhedged) (the “Index”). The Index encompasses an all-inclusive universe of institutionally traded bonds, including all fixed-rate bonds with remaining maturities of one year or longer with amounts outstanding of at least the equivalent of $25 million. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
76 |
Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance will be greater than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/15) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 2.00% and (3.20)%, respectively. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (0.45)%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Citigroup and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Class A shares are for the period beginning 8/17/12 (commencement of operations). The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
***The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2016.
† The Index return is since the inception of Class A shares. The Index return since inception of the Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares is 1.17%.
77 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
SOVEREIGN BONDS—63.7% | |||
Mexico—12.7% | |||
United Mexican States: | |||
1,130M | MXN | 7.75%, 11/13/2042 | $ 6,745,668 |
692M | MXN | 8.5%, 5/31/2029 | 4,272,204 |
760M | MXN | 8.5%, 11/18/2038 | 4,843,183 |
15,861,055 | |||
United Kingdom—9.0% | |||
8,485M | GBP | United Kingdom Gilt, 1.25%, 7/22/2018 | 11,224,105 |
Australia—8.6% | |||
3,765M | AUD | New South Wales Treasury Corp., 5%, 8/20/2024 | 3,502,601 |
Queensland Treasury Corp.: | |||
3,320M | AUD | 3.25%, 7/21/2026 | 2,729,032 |
3,020M | AUD | 4.75%, 7/21/2025 | 2,760,302 |
1,905M | AUD | 6%, 7/21/2022 | 1,774,495 |
10,766,430 | |||
Malaysia—5.6% | |||
Federation of Malaysia: | |||
14,190M | MYR | 3.48%, 3/15/2023 | 3,432,131 |
1,750M | MYR | 3.62%, 11/30/2021 | 430,531 |
7,020M | MYR | 3.659%, 10/15/2020 | 1,725,289 |
5,725M | MYR | 4.048%, 9/30/2021 | 1,433,642 |
7,021,593 | |||
South Africa—5.0% | |||
Republic of South Africa: | |||
42,530M | ZAR | 6.5%, 2/28/2041 | 2,267,347 |
14,655M | ZAR | 6.75%, 3/31/2021 | 1,016,901 |
43,490M | ZAR | 8.75%, 2/28/2048 | 2,962,454 |
6,246,702 | |||
Brazil—4.3% | |||
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional: | |||
8M | BRL | 10%, 1/1/2025 | 2,196,821 |
11M | BRL | 10%, 1/1/2027 | 3,116,193 |
5,313,014 |
78 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Portugal—3.9% | |||
Obrigacoes Do Tesouro: | |||
2,750M | EUR | 4.10%, 4/15/2037 | $ 3,111,690 |
1,355M | EUR | 4.95%, 10/25/2023 | 1,727,443 |
4,839,133 | |||
Indonesia—3.6% | |||
Republic of Indonesia: | |||
52,000,000M | IDR | 8.375%, 3/15/2034 | 4,354,915 |
1,900,000M | IDR | 9%, 3/15/2029 | 166,474 |
4,521,389 | |||
Poland—3.2% | |||
Republic of Poland: | |||
4,680M | PLN | 3.25%, 7/25/2025 | 1,263,350 |
9,720M | PLN | 4%, 10/25/2023 | 2,761,655 |
4,025,005 | |||
New Zealand—3.1% | |||
4,375M | NZD | New Zealand Government Bonds, 5.5%, 4/15/2023 | 3,858,502 |
Hungary—3.0% | |||
830,000M | HUF | Hungary Government Bond, 6%, 11/24/2023 | 3,760,050 |
Spain—1.7% | |||
1,090M | EUR | Bonos Y Obligaciones Del Estado, 5.15%, 10/31/2044 | 2,078,827 |
Total Value of Sovereign Bonds (cost $88,405,485) | 79,515,805 | ||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—17.9% | |||
United States | |||
U.S. Treasury Note: | |||
$ 20,640M | USD | 0.4242%, 7/31/2018 (a) | 20,642,951 |
1,580M | USD | 0.4402%, 4/30/2018 (a) | 1,581,694 |
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $22,219,117) | 22,224,645 | ||
CORPORATE BONDS—9.2% | |||
United States—6.3% | |||
Apple, Inc.: | |||
930M | USD | 4.5%, 2/23/2036 | 1,064,047 |
2,140M | USD | 4.65%, 2/23/2046 | 2,475,621 |
220M | USD | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 3.125%, 3/15/2026 | 231,511 |
79 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
United States (continued) | |||
$ 1,505M | USD | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., 6.35%, 10/15/2045 (b) | $ 1,558,264 |
735M | USD | JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, 1.3133%, 9/21/2018 (a) | 735,756 |
1,760M | USD | Wells Fargo & Co., 1.740%, 7/26/2021 (a) | 1,766,792 |
7,831,991 | |||
Australia—1.8% | |||
Macquarie Group, Ltd.: | |||
1,160M | USD | 1.7591%, 1/31/2017 (a)(b) | 1,162,103 |
1,030M | USD | 1.3635%, 10/27/2017 (a)(b) | 1,030,107 |
2,192,210 | |||
Netherlands—.4% | |||
420M | USD | Shell International Finance BV, 4.55%, 8/12/2043 | 464,378 |
New Zealand—.4% | |||
470M | USD | ANZ New Zealand International, Ltd. of London, | |
1.2535%, 4/27/2017 (a)(b) | 470,428 | ||
United Kingdom—.3% | |||
380M | USD | BP Capital Markets, PLC, 3.506%, 3/17/2025 | 403,234 |
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $10,809,321) | 11,362,241 | ||
GOVERNMENT REGIONAL AGENCY—1.6% | |||
South Korea—.8% | |||
1,010M | USD | Export-Import Bank of Korea, 1.4433%, 8/14/2017 (a)(b) | 1,009,030 |
Netherlands—.8% | |||
974M | USD | Bank Nederlandse Gemeenteen, 0.7434%, 7/14/2017 (a)(b) | 974,296 |
Total Value of Government Regional Agency (cost $1,983,433) | 1,983,326 | ||
SUPRANATIONAL—1.3% | |||
Venezuela—.9% | |||
1,075M | USD | Corp. Andina De Fomento, 2%, 5/10/2019 | 1,085,928 |
Luxembourg—.4% | |||
515M | USD | European Investment Bank, 1.125%, 9/15/2017 | 516,277 |
Total Value of Supranational (cost $1,589,472) | 1,602,205 |
80 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
GOVERNMENT GUARANTEED | |||||||
PROGRAM—1.1% | |||||||
France | |||||||
$ 1,400M | USD | Dexia Credit Local SA NY, 1.036%, 6/5/2018 | |||||
(cost $1,400,000) (a)(b) | $ 1,394,261 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $126,406,828) | 94.8 | % | 118,082,483 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 5.2 | 6,411,607 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $124,494,090 |
(a) | Interest rates are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates above are the rates in effect | |
at September 30, 2016. | ||
(b) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). | |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
AUD | Australian Dollar | |
BRL | Brazillian Real | |
CLP | Colombian Peso | |
EUR | Euro | |
GBP | British Pound | |
HUF | Hungarian Forint | |
IDR | Indonesian Rupiah | |
INR | Indian Rupee | |
MXN | Mexican Peso | |
MYR | Malaysian Ringgit | |
NOK | Norwegian Krone | |
NZD | New Zealand Dollar | |
PLN | Polish Zloty | |
SEK | Swedish Krona | |
USD | United States Dollar | |
ZAR | South African Rand |
81 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
September 30, 2016
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Sovereign Bonds | ||||||||||||
Mexico | $ | — | $ | 15,861,055 | $ | — | $ | 15,861,055 | ||||
United Kingdom | — | 11,224,105 | — | 11,224,105 | ||||||||
Australia | — | 10,766,430 | — | 10,766,430 | ||||||||
Malaysia | — | 7,021,593 | — | 7,021,593 | ||||||||
South Africa | — | 6,246,702 | — | 6,246,702 | ||||||||
Brazil | — | 5,313,014 | — | 5,313,014 | ||||||||
Portugal | — | 4,839,133 | — | 4,839,133 | ||||||||
Indonesia | — | 4,521,389 | — | 4,521,389 | ||||||||
Poland | — | 4,025,005 | — | 4,025,005 | ||||||||
New Zealand | — | 3,858,502 | — | 3,858,502 | ||||||||
Hungary | — | 3,760,050 | — | 3,760,050 | ||||||||
Spain | — | 2,078,827 | — | 2,078,827 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | ||||||||||||
United States | — | 22,224,645 | — | 22,224,645 |
82 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | — | $ | 7,831,991 | $ | — | $ | 7,831,991 | ||||
Australia | — | 2,192,210 | — | 2,192,210 | ||||||||
Netherlands | — | 464,378 | — | 464,378 | ||||||||
New Zealand | — | 470,428 | — | 470,428 | ||||||||
United Kingdom | — | 403,234 | — | 403,234 | ||||||||
Government Regional Agency | ||||||||||||
South Korea | — | 1,009,030 | — | 1,009,030 | ||||||||
Netherlands | — | 974,296 | — | 974,296 | ||||||||
Supranational | ||||||||||||
Venezuela | — | 1,085,928 | — | 1,085,928 | ||||||||
Luxembourg | — | 516,277 | — | 516,277 | ||||||||
Government Guaranteed Program | ||||||||||||
France | — | 1,394,261 | — | 1,394,261 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 118,082,483 | $ | — | $ | 118,082,483 | ||||
Other Financial Instruments* | $ | — | $ | 434,845 | $ | — | $ | 434,845 |
* | Other financial instruments are foreign exchange contracts and are considered derivative instruments, |
which are valued at the net unrealized appreciation on the instrument. | |
During the year ended September 30, 2016, there were no transfers between Level 1 investments and | |
Level 2 investments that had a material impact to the Fund. This does not include transfers between | |
Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments due to the Fund utilizing international fair value pricing | |
during the period (see Note 1A). Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the | |
reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 83 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Investment Grade Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 6.55% for Class A shares, 5.61% for Class B shares, 6.78% for Advisor shares and 6.97% for Institutional shares, including dividends of 35.9 cents per share on Class A shares, 26.8 cents per share on Class B shares, 37.1 cents per share on Advisor shares and 39.8 cents per share on Institutional shares.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell-off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4%, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international bonds fell into negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
84 |
The Bond Market
All major fixed income markets were positive for the past 12 months ending September 30th. The U.S. bond market (measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index) gained 5.26%.
Treasuries (measured by the BofA ML US Treasury Index) returned 4.33% during the review period. They did especially well during the first half of 2016 when they were boosted by declining interest rates and aggressive ECB easing. Longer-dated bonds significantly outperformed with 15+ year Treasuries gaining as much as 13.34% during the review period.
The Treasury yield curve flattened with short-term yields rising and long-term yields declining. The 2-year Treasury yield, which is very sensitive to changes in Fed policy, rose 13 basis points from 0.63% as of 9/30/2015 to 0.76% as of 9/30/2016. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield fell 44 basis points from 2.04% to 1.60%. The route of Treasury yields was very much influenced by the market’s expectations of actions and comments from central banks. Treasury yields reached their highest level of the review period during the end of 2015, when the market was pricing in the possibility that the Fed might raise interest rates four times in 2016. On the other hand, yields bottomed early in July on speculations that soft global growth would encourage major central banks to support economies with stimulus efforts, including continued low interest rates. The 2-year yield fell to 0.55% while the 10-year yield fell to a new all-time record low of 1.36%. There is an inverse relationship between bond prices and yield changes.
Municipal bonds (measured by the BofA ML Municipal Master Index) returned 5.58%, with the majority of this return happening during the first nine months of the review period. Despite elevated issuance, strong demand from investors looking for yield was a major factor in municipal bond market performance.
Investment grade corporate bonds (measured by the BofA ML Corporate Master Index) posted a strong return of 8.50% for the review period, with the majority of this return occurring between January and August. Low global interest rates and uncertainty caused by the Brexit vote helped this sector perform well as many fixed income investors looked to U.S. markets as a safe haven. In addition, investment grade corporate bonds benefited from the ECB’s corporate bond-buying program, as demand increased for this asset class.
The high yield bond market (measured by the BofA ML HY Cash Pay Constrained Index) showed strong overall performance of 12.80%. Demand for high yield bonds benefited from investors searching for income. This sector also benefited from a rebound in oil prices. The lowest rated high yield bonds (CCC-rated) were the best performers, gaining 18.05%. However, they also experienced the widest swings; they struggled much more during risk-off periods, while significantly outperforming during risk-on periods.
85 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
International fixed income posted strong overall returns, supported by falling yields. Non-U.S. sovereign bonds (measured by the Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index) were up 12.61%. Emerging markets (measured by the BofA ML Global Emerging Markets Sovereign Index) outperformed with a return of 17.50%. At the end of the review period there was about $9.3 trillion negative-yielding government debt instruments in the world, all of them outside the United States. This represents 37% of the Bloomberg Global Developed Sovereign Bond Index and 51% of the all non-U.S. sovereign bonds in the Index.
The Fund
The Fund invests in investment grade fixed income securities. The majority of the Fund’s assets were invested in investment grade corporate bonds. The Fund also had as much as 6.4% of its assets invested in high yield securities and 3.4% invested in U.S. Treasuries.
The performance of the corporate bond market during the review period was predominantly a result of duration and Treasury curve movement. Of note, corporate bonds with maturities greater than 10 years significantly outperformed shorter-maturity debt (i.e., 3–5 years), reflecting the flattening of the Treasury curve as investors reached for yield.
The Fund underperformed the BofA ML Corporate Master Index during the review period. The relative underperformance was predominantly a function of the Fund’s underweight in corporate bonds with maturities greater than 10 years, which had the highest returns during the review period. The Fund benefited from its overweight in the Basic Materials sector, particularly metals and mining issuers, which had the highest returns among different industry groups.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
86 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.03% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,039.73 | $5.25 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.85 | $5.20 | |
Class B Shares | 1.90% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,034.90 | $9.67 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.50 | $9.57 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.73% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,040.48 | $3.72 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.35 | $3.69 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.62% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,040.84 | $3.16 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.90 | $3.13 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total value of investments. |
87 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Investment Grade Fund (Class A shares) and the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Investment Grade Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/06 with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index (the “Index”). The Index includes publicly-issued, fixed rate, non-convertible investment grade dollar-denominated, S.E.C.-registered corporate debt having at least one year to maturity and an outstanding par value of at least $250 million. Bonds must be rated investment grade based on a composite of Moody’s and S&P. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund
88 |
portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 0.30%, 3.25% and 4.22%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 1.39%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 1.50%, 3.26% and 4.15%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 0.57%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 6.67% and 3.03%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 1.73%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 6.86% and 3.27%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 1.87%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class share are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
*** The S.E.C. 30-day yield shown is for September 2016.
†The Index return is for ten years. The Index return since inception of the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares is 4.02%.
89 |
Portfolio of Investments
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
CORPORATE BONDS—95.2% | |||
Aerospace/Defense—.7% | |||
$4,000M | Rolls-Royce, PLC, 3.625%, 10/14/2025 (a) | $ 4,231,920 | |
Agricultural Products—.6% | |||
3,310M | Cargill, Inc., 6%, 11/27/2017 (a) | 3,482,259 | |
Automotive—1.4% | |||
5,000M | Johnson Controls, Inc., 5%, 3/30/2020 | 5,495,345 | |
2,700M | O’Reilly Automotive, Inc., 3.55%, 3/15/2026 | 2,867,881 | |
8,363,226 | |||
Chemicals—3.0% | |||
4,000M | Agrium, Inc., 3.375%, 3/15/2025 | 4,128,472 | |
3,200M | CF Industries, Inc., 3.45%, 6/1/2023 | 3,228,835 | |
4,000M | Dow Chemical Co., 4.25%, 11/15/2020 | 4,346,804 | |
5,000M | LyondellBasell Industries NV, 6%, 11/15/2021 | 5,856,355 | |
17,560,466 | |||
Consumer Non-Durables—.7% | |||
Newell Brands, Inc.: | |||
2,300M | 4.7%, 8/15/2020 | 2,491,135 | |
1,800M | 4.2%, 4/1/2026 | 1,962,662 | |
4,453,797 | |||
Energy—9.4% | |||
5,000M | Canadian Oil Sands, Ltd., 7.75%, 5/15/2019 (a) | 5,616,005 | |
5,000M | Continental Resources, Inc., 5%, 9/15/2022 | 5,000,000 | |
3,000M | DCP Midstream Operating, LP, 2.5%, 12/1/2017 | 2,992,500 | |
5,000M | Enbridge Energy Partners, LP, 4.2%, 9/15/2021 | 5,307,105 | |
5,000M | Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, LP, 3.45%, 2/15/2023 | 4,991,355 | |
4,000M | Magellan Midstream Partners, LP, 5%, 3/1/2026 | 4,565,524 | |
Marathon Oil Corp.: | |||
2,700M | 6%, 10/1/2017 | 2,792,580 | |
1,800M | 3.85%, 6/1/2025 | 1,712,455 | |
5,000M | Nabors Industries, Inc., 6.15%, 2/15/2018 | 5,206,175 | |
2,000M | ONEOK Partners, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2022 | 2,020,600 | |
5,800M | Spectra Energy, LLC, 6.2%, 4/15/2018 | 6,137,102 | |
3,800M | Suncor Energy, Inc., 6.1%, 6/1/2018 | 4,083,309 |
90 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Energy (continued) | |||
Valero Energy Corp.: | |||
$4,000M | 9.375%, 3/15/2019 | $ 4,711,536 | |
900M | 3.4%, 9/15/2026 | 895,876 | |
56,032,122 | |||
Financial Services—14.9% | |||
4,000M | American Express Co., 7%, 3/19/2018 | 4,316,160 | |
American International Group, Inc.: | |||
3,700M | 3.75%, 7/10/2025 | 3,887,808 | |
2,000M | 4.7%, 7/10/2035 | 2,172,370 | |
4,500M | Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 5.3%, 3/15/2020 | 5,014,336 | |
5,400M | Assured Guaranty U.S. Holding, Inc., 5%, 7/1/2024 | 6,043,043 | |
4,300M | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 3.4%, 1/31/2022 | 4,660,280 | |
2,400M | Compass Bank, 6.4%, 10/1/2017 | 2,499,195 | |
ERAC USA Finance, LLC: | |||
3,000M | 7%, 10/15/2037 (a) | 4,104,282 | |
3,750M | 4.5%, 8/16/2021 (a) | 4,156,425 | |
6,200M | Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC, 8.125%, 1/15/2020 | 7,327,582 | |
General Electric Capital Corp.: | |||
6,400M | 4.65%, 10/17/2021 | 7,296,595 | |
3,400M | 6.75%, 3/15/2032 | 4,785,803 | |
2,700M | Harley Davidson Financial Services, Inc., 2.4%, 9/15/2019 (a) | 2,752,709 | |
1,800M | Harley-Davidson Funding Corp., 6.8%, 6/15/2018 (a) | 1,954,996 | |
2,700M | Key Bank NA, 3.4%, 5/20/2026 | 2,765,032 | |
4,000M | Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 4.95%, 5/1/2022 (a) | 4,468,928 | |
3,000M | National City Corp., 6.875%, 5/15/2019 | 3,381,336 | |
4,550M | Protective Life Corp., 7.375%, 10/15/2019 | 5,250,291 | |
3,000M | Prudential Financial, Inc., 7.375%, 6/15/2019 | 3,455,028 | |
4,000M | State Street Corp., 3.55%, 8/18/2025 | 4,341,848 | |
4,000M | Suntrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 9/11/2017 | 4,163,392 | |
88,797,439 | |||
Financials—23.1% | |||
Bank of America Corp.: | |||
5,925M | 5%, 5/13/2021 | 6,630,377 | |
3,250M | 4.1%, 7/24/2023 | 3,518,755 | |
4,625M | 5.875%, 2/7/2042 | 6,051,808 | |
Barclays Bank, PLC: | |||
2,000M | 5.125%, 1/8/2020 | 2,181,662 | |
3,800M | 3.75%, 5/15/2024 | 3,982,073 | |
3,200M | Capital One Financial Corp., 3.75%, 4/24/2024 | 3,402,925 |
91 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Financials (continued) | |||
Citigroup, Inc.: | |||
$2,250M | 8.5%, 5/22/2019 | $ 2,626,871 | |
6,200M | 4.5%, 1/14/2022 | 6,855,607 | |
5,000M | 3.7%, 1/12/2026 | 5,287,510 | |
Deutsche Bank AG London: | |||
2,700M | 3.375%, 5/12/2021 | 2,643,929 | |
3,000M | 3.7%, 5/30/2024 | 2,877,504 | |
4,000M | General Motors Financial Co., 5.25%, 3/1/2026 | 4,401,200 | |
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: | |||
2,000M | 5.375%, 3/15/2020 | 2,216,432 | |
1,800M | 2.35%, 11/15/2021 | 1,797,975 | |
5,900M | 5.75%, 1/24/2022 | 6,861,045 | |
3,000M | 3.625%, 1/22/2023 | 3,174,105 | |
4,550M | 6.125%, 2/15/2033 | 5,749,225 | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co.: | |||
6,200M | 6%, 1/15/2018 | 6,551,614 | |
5,000M | 4.5%, 1/24/2022 | 5,540,505 | |
3,000M | 6.4%, 5/15/2038 | 4,142,244 | |
Morgan Stanley: | |||
4,050M | 5.95%, 12/28/2017 | 4,265,703 | |
5,500M | 6.625%, 4/1/2018 | 5,895,247 | |
6,000M | 5.5%, 7/28/2021 | 6,850,494 | |
4,000M | UBS AG, 4.875%, 8/4/2020 | 4,453,344 | |
U.S. Bancorp: | |||
4,000M | 3.6%, 9/11/2024 | 4,291,404 | |
2,700M | 3.1%, 4/27/2026 | 2,792,510 | |
5,000M | Visa, Inc., 3.15%, 12/14/2025 | 5,287,840 | |
2,350M | Wells Fargo Bank NA, 5.85%, 2/1/2037 | 2,950,705 | |
Wells Fargo & Co.: | |||
2,900M | 4.60%, 4/1/2021 | 3,203,676 | |
8,600M | 3.45%, 2/13/2023 | 8,875,785 | |
2,000M | 4.4%, 6/14/2046 | 2,041,180 | |
137,401,254 | |||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—5.0% | |||
Anheuser-Busch InBev Finance: | |||
4,000M | 3.65%, 2/1/2026 | 4,304,336 | |
3,000M | 4.9%, 2/1/2046 | 3,584,130 | |
5,225M | Bunge Ltd. Finance Corp., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 6,129,954 |
92 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Food/Beverage/Tobacco (continued) | |||
$4,200M | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 6.82%, 5/1/2018 | $ 4,556,252 | |
6,000M | Ingredion, Inc, 4.625%, 11/1/2020 | 6,570,732 | |
4,000M | SABMiller Holdings, Inc., 3.75%, 1/15/2022 (a) | 4,333,760 | |
29,479,164 | |||
Food/Drug—1.0% | |||
4,000M | CVS Health Corp., 3.875%, 7/20/2025 | 4,362,440 | |
1,800M | Kroger Co., 2.65%, 10/15/2026 (b) | 1,790,471 | |
6,152,911 | |||
Forest Products/Containers—.5% | |||
2,500M | Rock-Tenn Co., 4.9%, 3/1/2022 | 2,812,545 | |
Healthcare—2.8% | |||
3,100M | Biogen, Inc., 6.875%, 3/1/2018 | 3,338,188 | |
4,050M | Express Scripts Holding Co., 4.75%, 11/15/2021 | 4,542,160 | |
4,000M | Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3.65%, 3/1/2026 | 4,310,340 | |
4,000M | Laboratory Corp. of America, 3.75%, 8/23/2022 | 4,269,632 | |
16,460,320 | |||
Information Technology—2.1% | |||
2,500M | Apple, Inc., 2.5%, 2/9/2025 | 2,533,355 | |
4,000M | Diamond 1 Finance Corp., 3.48%, 6/1/2019 (a) | 4,116,484 | |
4,000M | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., 2.85%, 10/5/2018 (a) | 4,077,512 | |
1,800M | Pitney Bowes, Inc., 5.75%, 9/15/2017 | 1,868,242 | |
12,595,593 | |||
Manufacturing—2.5% | |||
5,000M | CRH America, Inc., 8.125%, 7/15/2018 | 5,533,390 | |
4,000M | Ingersoll-Rand Global Holdings Co., Ltd., 6.875%, 8/15/2018 | 4,399,120 | |
4,550M | Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.55%, 10/1/2017 | 4,781,732 | |
14,714,242 | |||
Media-Broadcasting—1.9% | |||
1,800M | ABC, Inc., 8.75%, 8/15/2021 | 2,325,960 | |
3,950M | British Sky Broadcasting, PLC, 9.5%, 11/15/2018 (a) | 4,578,287 | |
4,000M | Comcast Corp., 4.25%, 1/15/2033 | 4,450,688 | |
11,354,935 |
93 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Media-Diversified—1.6% | |||
$5,000M | S&P Global, Inc., 5.9%, 11/15/2017 | $ 5,219,940 | |
4,000M | Time Warner, Inc., 3.6%, 7/15/2025 | 4,262,652 | |
9,482,592 | |||
Metals/Mining—4.0% | |||
5,000M | Alcoa, Inc., 6.15%, 8/15/2020 | 5,531,250 | |
4,000M | Glencore Finance Canada, Ltd., 4.95%, 11/15/2021 (a) | 4,235,216 | |
4,200M | Newmont Mining Corp., 5.125%, 10/1/2019 | 4,587,047 | |
5,000M | Rio Tinto Finance USA, Ltd., 3.75%, 9/20/2021 | 5,413,190 | |
4,000M | Vale Overseas, Ltd., 5.625%, 9/15/2019 | 4,235,000 | |
24,001,703 | |||
Real Estate—6.7% | |||
3,500M | AvalonBay Communities, Inc., 3.5%, 11/15/2024 | 3,671,437 | |
4,000M | Boston Properties, LP, 5.875%, 10/15/2019 | 4,444,264 | |
Digital Realty Trust, LP: | |||
2,700M | 5.25%, 3/15/2021 | 3,021,848 | |
2,700M | 4.75%, 10/1/2025 | 2,934,946 | |
4,000M | ERP Operating, LP, 3.375%, 6/1/2025 | 4,182,820 | |
2,200M | HCP, Inc., 4.25%, 11/15/2023 | 2,313,364 | |
Prologis, LP: | |||
2,000M | 3.35%, 2/1/2021 | 2,116,558 | |
1,125M | 3.75%, 11/1/2025 | 1,212,627 | |
4,213M | Realty Income Corp., 3.25%, 10/15/2022 | 4,361,100 | |
3,000M | Simon Property Group, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2024 | 3,189,228 | |
4,000M | Ventas Realty, LP, 4.75%, 6/1/2021 | 4,445,456 | |
4,000M | Welltower, Inc., 4%, 6/1/2025 | 4,249,088 | |
40,142,736 | |||
Retail-General Merchandise—1.3% | |||
4,000M | Amazon.com, Inc., 4.8%, 12/5/2034 | 4,714,212 | |
2,000M | Home Depot, Inc., 5.875%, 12/16/2036 | 2,748,562 | |
7,462,774 |
94 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Telecommunications—2.0% | |||
$4,000M | AT&T, Inc., 3.8%, 3/15/2022 | $ 4,289,640 | |
Verizon Communications, Inc.: | |||
2,800M | 5.15%, 9/15/2023 | 3,266,645 | |
4,100M | 4.862%, 8/21/2046 | 4,611,233 | |
12,167,518 | |||
Transportation—2.9% | |||
4,000M | Burlington North Santa Fe, 5.15%, 9/1/2043 | 4,986,160 | |
4,125M | GATX Corp., 4.75%, 6/15/2022 | 4,604,259 | |
3,000M | Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP, 4.875%, 7/11/2022 (a) | 3,351,936 | |
4,000M | Southwest Airlines Co., 2.65%, 11/5/2020 | 4,108,912 | |
17,051,267 | |||
Utilities—7.1% | |||
3,000M | Duke Energy Progress, Inc., 4.15%, 12/1/2044 | 3,291,603 | |
3,000M | E.ON International Finance BV, 5.8%, 4/30/2018 (a) | 3,188,493 | |
3,000M | Electricite de France SA, 3.625%, 10/13/2025 (a) | 3,158,040 | |
3,000M | Entergy Arkansas, Inc., 4.95%, 12/15/2044 | 3,187,308 | |
4,000M | Exelon Generation Co., LLC, 5.2%, 10/1/2019 | 4,397,348 | |
Great River Energy: | |||
173M | 5.829%, 7/1/2017 (a) | 177,406 | |
3,184M | 4.478%, 7/1/2030 (a) | 3,434,664 | |
3,850M | Ohio Power Co., 5.375%, 10/1/2021 | 4,410,591 | |
4,550M | Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., 4%, 12/15/2044 | 4,854,163 | |
2,121M | San Diego Gas & Electric Co., 1.914%, 2/1/2022 | 2,120,103 | |
4,000M | Sempra Energy, 9.8%, 2/15/2019 | 4,737,956 | |
4,000M | South Carolina Elec & Gas Co., 5.45%, 2/1/2041 | 5,050,040 | |
42,007,715 | |||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $537,494,336) | 566,208,498 |
95 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—3.3% | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bonds: | |||||||
$4,575M | 2.5%, 2/15/2045 | $ 4,729,049 | |||||
4,000M | 3%, 11/15/2044 | 4,561,876 | |||||
3,200M | 3%, 5/15/2045 | 3,649,312 | |||||
7,000M | U.S. Treasury Notes, 1.25%, 7/31/2023 | 6,927,676 | |||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $19,131,200) | 19,867,913 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL BONDS—.3% | |||||||
2,000M | Greater Orlando, FL Aviation Auth. Arpt. Facs. Rev., | ||||||
3.294%, 10/1/2032 (cost $2,000,000) (b) | 2,006,320 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $558,625,536) | 98.8 | % | 588,082,731 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.2 | 6,888,342 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $594,971,073 |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
(b) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis (see |
Note 1G). |
96 |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | $ | — | $ | 566,208,498 | $ | — | $ | 566,208,498 | ||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 19,867,913 | — | 19,867,913 | ||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 2,006,320 | — | 2,006,320 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | — | $ | 588,082,731 | $ | — | $ | 588,082,731 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for corporate |
bonds. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 97 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 1.21% for Class A shares, 1.47% for Advisor Class shares and 1.64% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 21.7 cents per share on Class A shares, 25.2 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 26.8 cents per share on Institutional Class shares.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell-off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4%, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international bonds fell into negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
98 |
The Bond Market
All major fixed income markets were positive for the past 12 months ending September 30th. The U.S. bond market (measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index) gained 5.26%.
Treasuries (BofA ML US Treasury Index) returned 4.33% during the review period. They did especially well during the first half of 2016 when they were boosted by declining interest rates and aggressive ECB easing. Longer-dated bonds significantly outperformed with 15+ year Treasuries gaining as much as 13.34% during the review period.
The Treasury yield curve flattened with short-term yields rising and long-term yields declining. The 2-year Treasury yield, which is very sensitive to changes in Fed policy, rose 13 basis points from 0.63% as of 9/30/2015 to 0.76% as of 9/30/2016. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield fell 44 basis points from 2.04% to 1.60%. The route of Treasury yields was very much influenced by the market’s expectations of actions and comments from central banks. Treasury yields reached their highest level of the review period during the end of 2015, when the market was pricing in the possibility that the Fed might raise interest rates four times in 2016. On the other hand, yields bottomed early in July on speculations that soft global growth would encourage major central banks to support economies with stimulus efforts, including continued low interest rates. The 2-year yield fell to 0.55% while the 10-year yield fell to a new all-time record low of 1.36%. There is an inverse relationship between bond prices and yield changes.
Municipal bonds (measured by the BofA ML Municipal Master Index) returned 5.58%, with the majority of this return happening during the first nine months of the review period. Despite elevated issuance, strong demand from investors looking for yield was a major factor in municipal bond market performance.
Investment grade corporate bonds (measured by the BofA ML Corporate Master Index) posted a strong return of 8.50% for the review period, with the majority of this return occurring between January and August. Low global interest rates and uncertainty caused by the Brexit vote helped this sector perform well as many fixed income investors looked to U.S. markets as a safe haven. In addition, investment grade corporate bonds benefited from the ECB’s corporate bond-buying program, as demand increased for this asset class.
The high yield bond market (measured by the BofA ML HY Cash Pay Constrained Index) showed strong overall performance of 12.80%. Demand for high yield bonds benefited from investors searching for income. This sector also benefited from a rebound in oil prices. The lowest rated high yield bonds (CCC-rated) were the best performers, gaining 18.05%. However, they also experienced the widest swings; they struggled much more during risk-off periods, while significantly outperforming during risk-on periods.
International fixed income posted strong overall returns, supported by falling yields. Non-U.S. sovereign bonds (Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index) were up 12.61%. Emerging markets (BofA ML Global Emerging Markets Sovereign Index)
99 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
outperformed with a return of 17.50%. At the end of the review period there was about $9.3 trillion negative-yielding government debt instruments in the world, all of them outside the United States. This represents 37% of the Bloomberg Global Developed Sovereign Bond Index and 51% of the all non-U.S. sovereign bonds in the Index.
The Fund
The Fund invests in investment grade fixed income securities. The majority of the Fund’s assets were invested in investment grade corporate bonds, asset-backed securities and mortgage-backed securities. The Fund seeks to maintain an average duration of between two and six years.
The 1–5 year broad bond market returned 2.35%, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Duration and credit risk were the key measure of performance during the review period; 5-year maturities had the best performance across all short- intermediate investment grade sectors; while BBB-rated bonds outperformed higher-rated bonds. For the review period, 1–5 year investment grade corporate bonds had total returns of 3.56%, 0–5 year mortgage-backed bonds gained 3.14%. Fixed rate asset-backed securities had total returns of 2.1%, 1–5 year Treasuries had a total return of 1.52% and 1–5 year Agency bonds had the worst sector returns gaining 1.36%.
The Fund underperformed the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Corporate Index during the review period. The relative performance was predominantly a function of the Fund being overweight the 1–3 year part of the yield curve, while being less exposed to the 3–5 year part of the curve across all investment grade asset classes. As a result, the Fund’s duration was relatively shorter than the index duration. In addition, the Fund had less exposure to lower-rated bonds in both corporates and asset-backed securities. The Fund was further negatively impacted by being underweight mortgage-backed securities, as well as having less exposure to 5-year U.S. Treasuries.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
100 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.05% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,005.70 | $5.26 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.75 | $5.30 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.75% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,007.21 | $3.76 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.25 | $3.79 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.60% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,008.86 | $3.01 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,022.00 | $3.03 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived and/or assumed. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
101 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund (Class A shares) and the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch 1–5 Year U.S. Broad Market Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Limited Duration Fund (Class A shares) beginning 5/19/14 (commencement of operations) with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch 1–5 Year U.S. Broad Market Index (the “Index”). The Index is a subset of the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index which tracks the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated investment grade debt publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market, including U.S. Treasury, quasi-government, corporate, securitized and collateralized securities. The Index includes all securities with a remaining term to final maturity or an average life less than 5 years. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table
102 |
it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares performance will be greater than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been (4.82)% and (3.03)%, respectively and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 0.35%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 1.21% and 0.59%, respectively and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 0.52%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 1.42% and (0.24)%, respectively and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2016 would have been 0.80%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the period beginning 5/19/14 (commencement of operations).
***The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2016.
103 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
CORPORATE BONDS—68.2% | |||
Automotive—2.4% | |||
$ 900M | BMW U.S. Capital, LLC, 1.85%, 9/15/2021 (a) | $ 898,067 | |
Daimler Finance NA, LLC: | |||
1,000M | 2.25%, 7/31/2019 (a) | 1,015,447 | |
1,000M | 2.45%, 5/18/2020 (a) | 1,021,640 | |
2,935,154 | |||
Chemicals—1.9% | |||
1,000M | Dow Chemical Co., 4.25%, 11/15/2020 | 1,086,701 | |
1,000M | Lubrizol Corp., 8.875%, 2/1/2019 | 1,169,244 | |
2,255,945 | |||
Consumer Durables—.4% | |||
500M | Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., 2.451%, 11/17/2018 | 511,106 | |
Energy—3.9% | |||
650M | ConocoPhillips Co., 1.05%, 12/15/2017 | 645,706 | |
900M | ExxonMobil Corp., 1.708%, 3/1/2019 | 909,916 | |
1,000M | Shell International Finance BV, 1.375%, 5/10/2019 | 997,622 | |
750M | Statoil ASA, 5.25%, 4/15/2019 | 821,356 | |
450M | Suncor Energy, Inc., 6.1%, 6/1/2018 | 483,550 | |
900M | TransCanada Pipelines, Ltd., 1.625%, 11/9/2017 | 902,531 | |
4,760,681 | |||
Financial Services—10.7% | |||
American Express Co.: | |||
500M | 6.15%, 8/28/2017 | 521,194 | |
500M | 7%, 3/19/2018 | 539,520 | |
1,000M | Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 5.3%, 3/15/2020 | 1,114,297 | |
1,000M | BlackRock, Inc., 5%, 12/10/2019 | 1,109,922 | |
250M | Branch Banking & Trust, 1.35%, 10/1/2017 | 250,118 | |
500M | ERAC USA Finance, LLC, 6.375%, 10/15/2017 (a) | 524,081 | |
925M | Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC, 5%, 5/15/2018 | 971,307 | |
1,250M | Harley-Davidson Funding Corp., 6.8%, 6/15/2018 (a) | 1,357,636 | |
700M | National City Bank, 5.25%, 12/15/2016 | 705,643 | |
1,500M | Protective Life Corp., 7.375%, 10/15/2019 | 1,730,865 | |
700M | Prudential Financial, Inc., 7.375%, 6/15/2019 | 806,173 |
104 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Financial Services (continued) | |||
Siemens Financieringsmaatschappij NV: | |||
$ 750M | 1.45%, 5/25/2018 (a) | $ 752,743 | |
1,000M | 1.7%, 9/15/2021 (a) | 993,110 | |
1,025M | State Street Bank & Trust, 5.25%, 10/15/2018 | 1,098,155 | |
500M | UnitedHealth Group, Inc., 2.7%, 7/15/2020 | 519,800 | |
12,994,564 | |||
Financials—21.5% | |||
1,400M | Bank of America Corp., 5.65%, 5/1/2018 | 1,485,637 | |
900M | Bank of Montreal, 1.9%, 8/27/2021 | 895,924 | |
900M | Bank of New York Mellon Corp., 2.05%, 5/3/2021 | 906,680 | |
700M | Barclays Bank, PLC, 6.75%, 5/22/2019 | 785,029 | |
1,000M | Capital One NA, 2.25%, 9/13/2021 | 1,000,784 | |
Citigroup, Inc.: | |||
500M | 6.125%, 11/21/2017 | 525,845 | |
250M | 8.5%, 5/22/2019 | 291,874 | |
1,000M | 2.65%, 10/26/2020 | 1,022,468 | |
1,000M | Danske Bank A/S, 2%, 9/8/2021 (a) | 1,000,038 | |
1,000M | Deutsche Bank AG, 1.875%, 2/13/2018 | 971,054 | |
1,000M | DNB Bank ASA, 2.375%, 6/2/2021 (a) | 1,018,553 | |
Fifth Third Bank: | |||
750M | 1.15%, 11/18/2016 | 750,013 | |
1,500M | 1.625%, 9/27/2019 | 1,499,797 | |
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: | |||
1,000M | 6.15%, 4/1/2018 | 1,065,493 | |
1,000M | 5.375%, 3/15/2020 | 1,108,216 | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co.: | |||
750M | 6%, 1/15/2018 | 792,534 | |
1,000M | 4.5%, 1/24/2022 | 1,108,101 | |
Morgan Stanley: | |||
500M | 5.95%, 12/28/2017 | 526,630 | |
1,000M | 6.625%, 4/1/2018 | 1,071,863 | |
1,000M | Northern Trust Co., 6.5%, 8/15/2018 | 1,093,438 | |
1,340M | Santander U.K., PLC, 2%, 8/24/2018 | 1,345,302 | |
750M | SunTrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 9/11/2017 | 780,636 | |
800M | U.S. Bank NA, 2.125%, 10/28/2019 | 814,622 |
105 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Financials (continued) | |||
UBS AG: | |||
$ 600M | 5.875%, 12/20/2017 | $ 631,708 | |
1,000M | 1.8%, 3/26/2018 | 1,002,208 | |
900M | Wachovia Corp., 5.75%, 2/1/2018 | 951,107 | |
1,500M | Wells Fargo & Co., 4.60%, 4/1/2021 | 1,657,074 | |
26,102,628 | |||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—4.0% | |||
900M | Anheuser-Busch InBev Finance, Inc., 1.9%, 2/1/2019 | 909,203 | |
1,500M | Bunge Ltd. Finance Corp., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 1,759,795 | |
500M | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 6.82%, 5/1/2018 | 542,411 | |
1,000M | Ingredion, Inc., 4.625%, 11/1/2020 | 1,095,122 | |
500M | Philip Morris International, Inc., 5.65%, 5/16/2018 | 534,839 | |
4,841,370 | |||
Forest Products/Container—.8% | |||
900M | Georgia Pacific, LLC, 3.163%, 11/15/2021 (a) | 941,633 | |
Health Care—1.8% | |||
1,000M | Gilead Sciences, Inc., 2.55%, 9/1/2020 | 1,033,478 | |
250M | Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 2.7%, 4/1/2019 | 256,806 | |
900M | Teva Pharmaceutical NE, 2.2%, 7/21/2021 | 897,621 | |
2,187,905 | |||
Information Technology—4.1% | |||
1,000M | Apple, Inc., 1.55%, 8/4/2021 | 998,962 | |
900M | Diamond 1 Finance Corp., 4.42%, 6/15/2021 (a) | 941,587 | |
500M | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., 2.85%, 10/5/2018 (a) | 509,689 | |
900M | Microsoft Corp., 1.55%, 8/8/2021 | 896,946 | |
1,000M | Oracle Corp., 1.9%, 9/15/2021 | 1,003,233 | |
550M | S&P Global, Inc., 5.9%, 11/15/2017 | 574,193 | |
4,924,610 | |||
Manufacturing—1.3% | |||
250M | CRH America, Inc., 8.125%, 7/15/2018 | 276,669 | |
500M | Ingersoll-Rand Global Holdings Co., Ltd., 6.875%, 8/15/2018 | 549,890 | |
750M | Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.55%, 10/1/2017 | 788,198 | |
1,614,757 |
106 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Real Estate—4.2% | |||
$1,000M | Boston Properties, LP, 5.875%, 10/15/2019 | $ 1,111,066 | |
500M | HCP, Inc., 6.7%, 1/30/2018 | 533,618 | |
1,000M | Realty Income Corp., 3.25%, 10/15/2022 | 1,035,153 | |
500M | Simon Property Group, LP, 10.35%, 4/1/2019 | 597,074 | |
650M | Ventas Realty, LP, 4%, 4/30/2019 | 683,240 | |
1,000M | Welltower, Inc., 6.125%, 4/15/2020 | 1,133,678 | |
5,093,829 | |||
Retail-General Merchandise—1.5% | |||
1,000M | Amazon.com, Inc., 2.6%, 12/5/2019 | 1,038,345 | |
800M | McDonald’s Corp., 2.1%, 12/7/2018 | 812,650 | |
1,850,995 | |||
Telecommunications—2.3% | |||
AT&T, Inc.: | |||
500M | 5.875%, 10/1/2019 | 559,791 | |
500M | 2.45%, 6/30/2020 | 509,681 | |
Verizon Communications, Inc.: | |||
800M | 3.65%, 9/14/2018 | 835,388 | |
900M | 1.75%, 8/15/2021 | 891,191 | |
2,796,051 | |||
Transportation—.9% | |||
1,000M | Southwest Airlines Co., 2.65%, 11/5/2020 | 1,027,228 | |
Utilities—6.5% | |||
500M | Arizona Public Service Co., 8.75%, 3/1/2019 | 584,377 | |
500M | Consolidated Edison Co., Inc. of New York, 7.125%, 12/1/2018 | 560,613 | |
500M | Entergy Gulf States Lousiana, LLC, 6%, 5/1/2018 | 533,238 | |
1,000M | Exelon Generation Co., LLC, 6.2%, 10/1/2017 | 1,044,482 | |
86M | Great River Energy Co., 5.829%, 7/1/2017 (a) | 88,703 | |
1,000M | Ohio Power Co., 6.05%, 5/1/2018 | 1,067,426 | |
500M | Public Service Electric & Gas Co., 1.8%, 6/1/2019 | 507,084 | |
613M | San Diego Gas & Electric Co., 1.914%, 2/1/2022 | 612,474 | |
500M | Sempra Energy, 9.8%, 2/15/2019 | 592,245 | |
1,557M | Southern Power Co., 1.85%, 12/1/2017 | 1,567,351 | |
700M | Wisconsin Public Service Corp., 1.65%, 12/4/2018 | 705,451 | |
7,863,444 | |||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $82,302,723) | 82,701,900 |
107 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES—13.0% | |||
Fixed Autos—6.6% | |||
$1,200M | Avis Budget Rental Car Funding AESOP, LLC, | ||
2.97%, 2/20/2020 (a) | $ 1,224,210 | ||
Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust: | |||
171M | 0.79%, 5/15/2018 | 171,334 | |
910M | 1.39%, 7/15/2020 | 913,301 | |
250M | Ford Credit Floorplan Master Owner Trust, 1.42%, 1/15/2020 | 250,740 | |
620M | GM Financial Auto Leasing Trust, 1.76%, 3/20/2020 | 621,198 | |
285M | Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust, 1.3%, 3/16/2020 | 285,630 | |
900M | Hertz Vehicle Financing, LLC, 2.65%, 7/25/2022 (a) | 911,460 | |
480M | Honda Auto Receivables Owner Trust, 1.46%, 10/15/2020 | 482,611 | |
950M | Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust, 1.48%, 6/15/2021 | 955,381 | |
700M | Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust, 1.52%, 6/15/2020 | 704,074 | |
1,450M | Volkswagen Auto Lease Trust, 1.25%, 12/20/2017 | 1,449,823 | |
7,969,762 | |||
Fixed Credit Cards—4.9% | |||
1,200M | Barclays DryRock Issuance Trust, 2.2%, 12/15/2022 | 1,228,140 | |
1,675M | Capital One Multi-Asset Execution Trust, 1.6%, 5/17/2021 | 1,689,162 | |
Chase Issuance Trust: | |||
900M | 1.49%, 7/15/2022 | 903,744 | |
300M | 1.84%, 4/15/2022 | 304,852 | |
1,320M | Discover Card Execution Note Trust, 2.12%, 12/15/2021 | 1,348,933 | |
500M | Synchrony Credit Card Master Note Trust, 2.21%, 5/15/2024 | 510,494 | |
5,985,325 | |||
Fixed Equipment—1.5% | |||
940M | John Deere Owner Trust, 1.36%, 4/15/2020 | 941,224 | |
900M | Kubota Credit Owner Trust, 1.71%, 10/15/2022 (a) | 905,890 | |
1,847,114 | |||
Total Value of Asset Backed Securities (cost $15,731,193) | 15,802,201 | ||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | |||
SECURITIES—11.0% | |||
Fannie Mae—9.1% | |||
2,610M | 2.5%, 8/1/2030 – 10/18/2031 (b) | 2,704,879 | |
3,747M | 3%, 8/1/2026 – 4/1/2031 | 3,944,260 | |
4,084M | 3.5%, 12/1/2025 – 12/1/2029 | 4,343,824 | |
10,992,963 |
108 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Freddie Mac—1.9% | |||||||
$1,679M | 3%, 8/1/2027 – 8/1/2030 | $ 1,771,765 | |||||
486M | 3.5%, 12/1/2025 | 519,492 | |||||
2,291,257 | |||||||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $13,169,058) | 13,284,220 | ||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—3.8% | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes: | |||||||
1,680M | 1%, 3/15/2019 | 1,686,628 | |||||
1,000M | 1.125%, 7/31/2021 | 998,672 | |||||
1,920M | 1.375%, 4/30/2020 | 1,945,275 | |||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $4,599,945) | 4,630,575 | ||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.0% | |||||||
265M | Fannie Mae, 1.5%, 6/22/2020 | 269,200 | |||||
1,000M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.875%, 10/1/2018 | 999,855 | |||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $1,263,262) | 1,269,055 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $117,066,181) | 97.0 | % | 117,687,951 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 3.0 | 3,595,385 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $121,283,336 |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
(b) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis (see |
Note 1G). |
109 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND
September 30, 2016
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | $ | — | $ | 82,701,900 | $ | — | $ | 82,701,900 | ||||
Asset Backed Securities | — | 15,802,201 | — | 15,802,201 | ||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 13,284,220 | — | 13,284,220 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 4,630,575 | — | 4,630,575 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 1,269,055 | — | 1,269,055 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | — | $ | 117,687,951 | $ | — | $ | 117,687,951 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for corporate bonds |
and asset backed securities. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
110 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Strategic Income Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 5.64% for Class A shares and 6.14% for Advisor Class shares, including dividends of 31.6 cents per share on Class A shares and 35.9 cents per share on Advisor Class shares. In addition, the Fund distributed capital gains of 1.7 cents per share on each class of shares.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell-off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4%, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international
111 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
bonds fell into negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
The Bond Market
All major fixed income markets were positive for the past 12 months ending September 30th. The U.S. bond market (measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index) gained 5.26%.
Treasuries (BofA ML US Treasury Index) returned 4.33% during the review period. They did especially well during the first half of 2016 when they were boosted by declining interest rates and aggressive ECB easing. Longer-dated bonds significantly outperformed with 15+ year Treasuries gaining as much as 13.34% during the review period.
The Treasury yield curve flattened with short-term yields rising and long-term yields declining. The 2-year Treasury yield, which is very sensitive to changes in Fed policy, rose 13 basis points from 0.63% as of 9/30/2015 to 0.76% as of 9/30/2016. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield fell 44 basis points from 2.04% to 1.60%. The route of Treasury yields was very much influenced by the market’s expectations of actions and comments from central banks. Treasury yields reached their highest level of the review period during the end of 2015, when the market was pricing in the possibility that the Fed might raise interest rates four times in 2016. On the other hand, yields bottomed early in July on speculations that soft global growth would encourage major central banks to support economies with stimulus efforts, including continued low interest rates. The 2-year yield fell to 0.55% while the 10-year yield fell to a new all-time record low of 1.36%. There is an inverse relationship between bond prices and yield changes.
Municipal bonds (measured by the BofA ML Municipal Master Index) returned 5.58%, with the majority of this return happening during the first nine months of the review period. Despite elevated issuance, strong demand from investors looking for yield was a major factor in municipal bond market performance.
Investment grade corporate bonds (measured by the BofA ML Corporate Master Index) posted a strong return of 8.50% for the review period, with the majority of this return occurring between January and August. Low global interest rates and uncertainty caused by the Brexit vote helped this sector perform well as many fixed income investors looked to U.S. markets as a safe haven. In addition, investment grade corporate bonds benefited from the ECB’s corporate bond-buying program, as demand increased for this asset class.
112 |
The high yield bond market (measured by the BofA ML HY Cash Pay Constrained Index) showed strong overall performance of 12.80%. Demand for high yield bonds benefited from investors searching for income. This sector also benefited from a rebound in oil prices. The lowest rated high yield bonds (CCC-rated) were the best performers, gaining 18.05%. However, they also experienced the widest swings; they struggled much more during risk-off periods, while significantly outperforming during risk-on periods.
International fixed income posted strong overall returns, supported by falling yields. Non-U.S. sovereign bonds (Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index) were up 12.61%. Emerging markets (BofA ML Global Emerging Markets Sovereign Index) outperformed with a return of 17.50%. At the end of the review period, there was about $9.3 trillion negative-yielding government debt instruments in the world, all of them outside the United States. This represents 37% of the Bloomberg Global Developed Sovereign Bond Index and 51% of the all non-U.S. sovereign bonds in the Index.
The Fund
The Fund can invest through institutional class shares in a number of First Investors Funds (“Underlying Funds”). The average allocations to Underlying Funds as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets, the total returns for the review period and the allocations as a percentage of net assets as of the end of the period were:
Average Allocations, | Allocations, | ||
Review Period | Total Return | 9/30/16 | |
Covered Call Strategy Fund | 1.0% | 4.18% | 2.5% |
Equity Income Fund | 2.3% | 14.67% | 0.0% |
Floating Rate Fund | 8.3% | 4.14% | 7.5% |
Fund For Income | 35.8% | 9.58% | 39.7% |
Government Fund | 9.8% | 2.62% | 5.0% |
International Opportunities | |||
Bond Fund | 6.9% | 8.85% | 5.1% |
Investment Grade Fund | 14.2% | 6.97% | 19.8% |
Limited Duration High | |||
Quality Bond Fund | 12.4% | 1.64% | 14.8% |
Tax Exempt Income Fund | 5.3% | 3.31% | 0.0% |
Cash and Equivalents | 4.0% | 0.00% | 5.6% |
* For the period 4/1/16 (commencement of operations) through 9/30/16. |
113 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
For the review period, the Fund returned 5.64% on Class A shares compared to 5.27% for its benchmark, the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index. The Fund was positioned for a higher interest rates, following the Fed’s interest rate hike in December. Consequently, the Fund’s investments emphasized Underlying Funds that would provide relatively high yield, while minimizing the negative impact of rising interest rates.
While interest rates did not rise during the review period, the Fund’s focus on higher-yielding bonds allowed it to outperform its benchmark. Specifically, the Fund’s allocations to high yield bonds (through the Fund For Income) and investment grade corporate bonds (through the Investment Grade Fund) made positive contributions to the Fund’s performance. Conversely, its investment in the Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund detracted from performance.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
114 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 0.55% | |||
Actual* | $1,000.00 | $1,034.81 | $2.80 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,022.25 | $2.78 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.12% | |||
Actual* | $1,000.00 | $1,037.69 | $0.61 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,024.40 | $0.61 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the inception period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY FIRST INVESTORS UNDERLYING FUNDS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total value of investments. |
115 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Strategic Income Fund (Class A shares) and the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Strategic Income Fund (Class A shares) beginning 4/3/13 (commencement of operations) with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index (the “Index”). The Index tracks the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated investment grade debt publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market, including U.S. Treasury, quasi-government, corporate, securitized and collateralized securities. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Advisor Class shares performance will be greater than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
116 |
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since this class is sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 0.02%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 2.02%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Citigroup and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Class A shares and Advisor Class shares are for the period beginning 4/3/13 (commencement of operations).
117 |
Portfolio of Investments
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
COMMON STOCKS—94.4% | |||||||
First Investors Income Funds—91.9% | |||||||
1,158,454 | Floating Rate Fund – Institutional Class Shares | $ 11,167,497 | |||||
23,873,743 | Fund For Income – Institutional Class Shares | 59,445,620 | |||||
683,229 | Government Fund – Institutional Class Shares | 7,447,197 | |||||
829,735 | International Opportunities Bond Fund – | ||||||
Institutional Class Shares | 7,708,242 | ||||||
2,983,095 | Investment Grade Fund – Institutional Class Shares | 29,592,300 | |||||
2,280,447 | Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund – | ||||||
Institutional Class Shares | 22,120,332 | ||||||
137,481,188 | |||||||
First Investors Equity Funds—2.5% | |||||||
363,379 | Covered Call Strategy Fund – Institutional Class Shares | 3,760,976 | |||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $144,920,866) | 141,242,164 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—5.0% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$1,000M | 0.28%, 10/11/2016 | 999,960 | |||||
3,000M | 0.28%, 10/13/2016 | 2,999,850 | |||||
2,000M | 0.295%, 10/21/2016 | 1,999,820 | |||||
1,500M | 0.285%, 11/8/2016 | 1,499,685 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $7,498,863) | 7,499,315 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $152,419,729) | 99.4 | % | 148,741,479 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .6 | 863,545 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $149,605,024 |
118 |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Mutual Funds | ||||||||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ | 137,481,188 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 137,481,188 | ||||
First Investors Equity Funds | 3,760,976 | — | — | 3,760,976 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 7,499,315 | — | 7,499,315 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 141,242,164 | $ | 7,499,315 | $ | — | $ | 148,741,479 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 119 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
COVERED CALL STRATEGY FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Covered Call Strategy Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. Since inception April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 3.94% for Class A shares, 4.05% for Advisor Class shares and 4.18% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 3.4 cents per share for Class A shares, 6.4 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 6.8 cents per share for Institutional Class shares.
Market Environment
Bond yields are near all-time lows and, after seven years of an equity bull market, equity valuations have become less attractive. In this investment environment, an allocation to a conservative equity strategy that holds reasonably valued equities appears prudent. We believe that FAMCO Group’s investment strategy for the First Investors Covered Call Strategy Fund, which combines high quality equities with written call options for potential downside protection, provides investors with a low beta, lower volatility equity vehicle.
While overall GDP growth has been below initial economic forecasts this year, there are relative bright spots in the economy that impact our portfolio positioning. Tighter labor markets, signs of increasing wages, low gas prices and low interest rates provide a favorable backdrop for increased consumer spending. As a result, we are overweight the Consumer sector in our portfolios. Housing is another area of potential strength as bank lending for residential loans has steadily increased along with continued employment gains. As more people become employed for longer periods, more people will qualify for a mortgage. Lastly, we continue to favor companies with strong excess cash flows. In the current slow growth environment, where growth opportunities have been relatively limited, large corporations have continued to return record amounts of cash to shareholders through both dividend payments and share buybacks.
Performance Discussion
During the third quarter, the Fund returned 3.0%, 120 basis points higher than the benchmark BXM Index return of 1.8%. The stocks and the call options in the portfolio both outperformed their respective benchmarks during the quarter. Quarter-to-date, the stocks outperformed the S&P 500 Index by 0.2% and the call options outperformed the BXM Index call options by 0.9%. The outperformance of the call options can be attributed to the FAMCO Group’s actively managed options selection process on single stock call options versus the BXM Index’s rules-based call option strategy on Index options.
Inception-to-date, the Fund returned 4.8% gross of fees, in line with the benchmark BXM Index return of 4.8%. The stocks in the Fund returned 6.0%, outperforming the S&P 500 Index’s return by 30 basis points. Since its inception, the Fund has produced similar returns as the S&P 500 Index with lower risk. The standard deviation of daily returns inception-to-date was 12.0% for the S&P 500 Index, 12.3% for the ten largest “low
120 |
volatility” U.S. equity funds, and 7.6% for the Fund. Higher quality equity holdings and downside protection from the call options were the keys to reducing risk by more than one third compared to the S&P 500 Index. The risk-reducing characteristics of the call options have helped the Fund to produce a superior Sharpe ratio relative to the S&P 500 Index both quarter-to-date and inception-to-date.
Allocation and stock selection were strong in Consumer Staples as we avoided many of the overvalued names in the sector which had negative returns. The underweight to Healthcare providers contributed positively to returns, while the Aerospace and Defense overweight detracted from returns. An underweight allocation to the Technology sector detracted from returns, as this was the top performing sector during the quarter. We continue to favor companies with above average dividends, reasonable valuations and attractive call option premiums.
Outlook
We have positioned the call options closer to current stock prices in order to produce more downside protection and higher call premiums, at the expense of upside participation. We view the S&P 500’s valuation (trailing P/E = 20.4) as a headwind to significant upside stock appreciation, particularly in a slowly growing economy. Low volatility, dividend paying equities are attractive in this environment. However, the valuation of such stocks has become a concern. For example, the ten largest “low volatility” U.S. equity funds have an average trailing price/earnings (“P/E”) ratio of 23.1 versus the S&P 500 Index P/E ratio of 20.4. While these funds typically produce less price volatility than the S&P 500 Index, the above-market valuation is a risk. We have focused the Fund on dividend-paying equities with valuation being a priority in our process. For example, at quarter-end, the portfolio had a trailing P/E ratio of 15.0 and an above average dividend yield of 2.9%—both more attractive than the S&P 500 Index. While stock selection is important, the majority of the Fund’s volatility reduction relative to the S&P 500 Index comes from the call options. We are using call options to reduce risk in the portfolio. We continue to believe reasonably-priced large-cap stocks offer the best risk/reward potential going forward, especially when combined with call premiums that can help stabilize returns and provide downside protection.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
121 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
COVERED CALL STRATEGY FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16)* | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)** |
Class A Shares | 1.30% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,039.40 | $6.63 | |
Hypothetical*** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.50 | $6.56 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.97% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,040.50 | $4.95 | |
Hypothetical*** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.15 | $4.90 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.84% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,041.85 | $4.29 | |
Hypothetical*** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.80 | $4.24 |
* | Commencement of operations. |
** | Actual expenses reflect only from the commencment of operations to the end of the period |
covered (April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016). Expenses are equal to the annualized | |
expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to | |
reflect the inception period). Expenses paid during the period are net of expenses waived and/or | |
assumed. | |
*** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total value of investments. |
122 |
Portfolio of Investments
COVERED CALL STRATEGY FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS—98.0% | |||
Consumer Discretionary—17.5% | |||
2,700 | AutoZone, Inc. | $ 2,074,518 | |
116,300 | Ford Motor Company | 1,403,741 | |
73,900 | General Motors Company | 2,347,803 | |
28,400 | Home Depot, Inc. | 3,654,512 | |
35,900 | Time Warner, Inc. | 2,857,999 | |
17,000 | Walt Disney Company | 1,578,620 | |
13,400 | Whirlpool Corporation | 2,172,944 | |
16,090,137 | |||
Consumer Staples—8.0% | |||
38,200 | CVS Health Corporation | 3,399,418 | |
36,500 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 3,970,105 | |
7,369,523 | |||
Energy—2.8% | |||
24,400 | Chevron Corporation | 2,511,248 | |
Financials—11.5% | |||
31,300 | American Express Company | 2,004,452 | |
7,600 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2,754,696 | |
46,300 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 3,083,117 | |
63,400 | U.S. Bancorp | 2,719,226 | |
10,561,491 | |||
Health Care—9.0% | |||
8,000 | * | Allergan, PLC | 1,842,480 |
27,000 | Johnson & Johnson | 3,189,510 | |
96,700 | Pfizer, Inc. | 3,275,229 | |
8,307,219 | |||
Industrials—18.7% | |||
14,200 | Boeing Company | 1,870,708 | |
70,000 | Delta Air Lines, Inc. | 2,755,200 | |
62,700 | General Electric Company | 1,857,174 | |
30,600 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 3,567,654 |
123 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
COVERED CALL STRATEGY FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Industrials (continued) | |||||||
23,600 | Raytheon Company | $ 3,212,668 | |||||
20,300 | Union Pacific Corporation | 1,979,859 | |||||
19,100 | United Technologies Corporation | 1,940,560 | |||||
17,183,823 | |||||||
Information Technology—18.2% | |||||||
41,200 | Apple, Inc. | 4,657,660 | |||||
113,600 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3,603,392 | |||||
86,900 | Intel Corporation | 3,280,475 | |||||
12,300 | International Business Machines Corporation | 1,953,855 | |||||
47,000 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 3,219,500 | |||||
16,714,882 | |||||||
Materials—3.2% | |||||||
57,100 | Dow Chemical Company | 2,959,493 | |||||
Telecommunication Services—6.2% | |||||||
76,800 | AT&T, Inc. | 3,118,848 | |||||
49,900 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 2,593,802 | |||||
5,712,650 | |||||||
Utilities—2.9% | |||||||
51,100 | Southern Company | 2,621,430 | |||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $88,162,729) | 98.0 | % | 90,031,896 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 2.0 | 1,825,456 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $91,857,352 |
* | Non-income producing |
124 |
Expiration | Exercise | |||
CALL OPTIONS WRITTEN—2.5% | Date | Price | Contracts | Value |
Allergan, PLC | 10/21/16 | $240.00 | 30 | $ 6,840 |
Allergan, PLC | 10/21/16 | 250.00 | 3 | 180 |
Allergan, PLC | 11/18/16 | 240.00 | 47 | 27,636 |
American Express Company | 1/20/17 | 65.00 | 313 | 79,189 |
Apple, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 114.00 | 274 | 39,730 |
Apple, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 105.00 | 97 | 80,025 |
Apple, Inc. | 12/16/16 | 115.00 | 41 | 14,637 |
AT&T, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 40.00 | 77 | 6,622 |
AT&T, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 43.00 | 584 | 584 |
AT&T, Inc. | 11/18/16 | 41.00 | 39 | 2,262 |
AutoZone, Inc. | 12/16/16 | 740.00 | 23 | 104,650 |
AutoZone, Inc. | 12/16/16 | 750.00 | 3 | 10,950 |
AutoZone, Inc. | 12/16/16 | 760.00 | 1 | 3,245 |
BlackRock, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 360.00 | 29 | 24,099 |
BlackRock, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 370.00 | 47 | 19,270 |
Boeing Company | 11/18/16 | 135.00 | 128 | 31,872 |
Boeing Company | 12/16/16 | 130.00 | 14 | 7,770 |
Chevron Corporation. | 10/21/16 | 100.00 | 244 | 99,552 |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | 11/4/16 | 31.50 | 154 | 9,086 |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | 11/18/16 | 31.00 | 881 | 109,244 |
CVS Health Corporation | 1/20/17 | 95.00 | 133 | 15,960 |
CVS Health Corporation | 1/20/17 | 97.50 | 249 | 17,679 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 41.00 | 630 | 41,580 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc. | 12/16/16 | 40.00 | 70 | 14,000 |
Dow Chemical Company | 12/16/16 | 55.00 | 571 | 46,822 |
Ford Motor Company | 12/16/16 | 13.00 | 987 | 13,818 |
Ford Motor Company | 1/20/17 | 12.75 | 176 | 5,632 |
General Electric Company | 10/21/16 | 31.00 | 488 | 2,440 |
General Electric Company | 10/21/16 | 32.00 | 44 | 88 |
General Electric Company | 11/18/16 | 30.00 | 95 | 4,845 |
General Motors Company | 10/21/16 | 32.00 | 739 | 42,123 |
Home Depot, Inc. | 10/28/16 | 129.00 | 241 | 53,502 |
Home Depot, Inc. | 1/20/17 | 130.00 | 43 | 18,275 |
Honeywell International, Inc. | 12/16/16 | 120.00 | 306 | 50,796 |
Intel Corporation | 10/21/16 | 34.00 | 661 | 257,129 |
Intel Corporation | 10/21/16 | 36.00 | 77 | 16,478 |
Intel Corporation | 10/21/16 | 37.00 | 131 | 17,816 |
International Business Machines | ||||
Corporation | 10/21/16 | 160.00 | 72 | 24,912 |
International Business Machines | ||||
Corporation | 10/21/16 | 165.00 | 51 | 7,905 |
Johnson & Johnson. | 10/7/16 | 120.00 | 24 | 768 |
125 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
COVERED CALL STRATEGY FUND
September 30, 2016
Expiration | Exercise | |||
CALL OPTIONS WRITTEN—2.5% | Date | Price | Contracts | Value |
Johnson & Johnson. | 10/21/16 | $118.00 | 246 | $ 47,232 |
JPMorgan Chase & Company | 10/21/16 | 67.50 | 422 | 30,384 |
PepsiCo, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 108.00 | 37 | 6,475 |
PepsiCo, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 110.00 | 328 | 22,632 |
Pfizer, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 34.00 | 49 | 2,156 |
Pfizer, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 36.00 | 68 | 136 |
Pfizer, Inc. | 11/18/16 | 35.00 | 850 | 26,350 |
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 62.50 | 231 | 143,220 |
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 11/18/16 | 65.00 | 239 | 117,110 |
Raytheon Company | 11/18/16 | 140.00 | 57 | 9,234 |
Raytheon Company | 11/18/16 | 145.00 | 179 | 47,972 |
Southern Company | 11/18/16 | 52.50 | 122 | 8,052 |
Southern Company | 11/18/16 | 55.00 | 389 | 5,057 |
Time Warner, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 77.50 | 341 | 99,231 |
Time Warner, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 79.00 | 18 | 3,132 |
U.S. Bancorp. | 10/21/16 | 43.00 | 96 | 7,200 |
U.S. Bancorp. | 10/21/16 | 44.00 | 538 | 17,216 |
Union Pacific Corporation | 11/18/16 | 95.00 | 203 | 99,470 |
United Technologies Corporation | 10/21/16 | 103.00 | 29 | 3,045 |
United Technologies Corporation | 11/18/16 | 110.00 | 162 | 2,754 |
Verizon Communications, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 52.00 | 75 | 4,425 |
Verizon Communications, Inc. | 10/21/16 | 55.00 | 114 | 570 |
Walt Disney Company | 12/16/16 | 95.00 | 26 | 4,888 |
Walt Disney Company | 1/20/17 | 100.00 | 144 | 11,808 |
Whirlpool Corporation | 11/18/16 | 190.00 | 12 | 378 |
Whirlpool Corporation | 12/16/16 | 165.00 | 20 | 13,100 |
Whirlpool Corporation | 12/16/16 | 200.00 | 102 | 2,550 |
Total Value of Call Options Written (premium received $2,150,687) | $2,065,788 |
126 |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets and liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks* | $ | 90,031,896 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 90,031,896 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||
Call Options Written | $ | (2,065,788) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (2,065,788) |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 127 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
EQUITY INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Equity Income Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 14.16% for Class A shares, 13.20% for Class B shares, 14.63% for Advisor Class shares and 14.67% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 15.9 cents per share for Class A shares, 8.6 cents per share for Class B shares, 19.0 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 19.0 cents per share for Institutional Class shares. In addition, the Fund distributed capital gains of 35.4 cents per share on each class of shares.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell-off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4%, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international bonds fell into negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
128 |
The Equity Market
Overall, U.S. equities (measured by the S&P 500 TR Index) posted a strong return of 15.43% for the 12 months ending September 30th. However, they experienced turbulent swings during this period. U.S. equity markets started the review period on a strong note, rallying 8.44% in October 2015 as they were recovering from the August and September sell-off. This was later followed by double-digit losses, amid worries about China, global growth and falling oil prices. Most of those fears subsided in mid-February as China’s markets stabilized, oil producers talked about decreasing supply, and Janet Yellen implied there would be fewer rate hikes than expected in 2016. Then, markets strongly rebounded from the February 11th bottom and gained almost 17% by the June 23rd Brexit vote. Markets then lost over 5% in the two days following the Brexit vote, followed by another strong rally which lasted until mid-July. Markets then stayed calm for the rest of the summer before volatility returned in September.
Overall, mid-cap stocks (measured by the S&P Midcap 400 Index) and small caps (Russell 2000 Index) posted similar returns to large caps, returning 15.33% and 15.46% for the period. However, they experienced much wider swings within the period, especially small caps. Large caps led the market during the fourth quarter of 2015, while small caps outperformed during the third quarter of 2016.
Higher-yielding stocks, including Utilities and real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), outperformed for most of the review period, supported by the low yielding environment and lack of other higher-yielding options. However, they became expensive and fell out of favor in August and September as economic data hinted that the Fed might increase rates by the end of the year. Overall, the Dow Jones U.S. Select Dividend Index and Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index returned 22.24% and 17.70%, respectively, for the past 12 months. All of the S&P 500 sectors ended the review period in positive territory, ranging from 7.40% (Financials) to 26.82% (Telecom Services).
International equities were positive as well. Developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada (measured by the MSCI EAFE Index) finished the review period up 7.06%. Emerging markets (the MSCI EM Index) outperformed developed markets with a return of 17.21%. This was a result of negative yields on many developed market bonds which increased demand for emerging market assets with positive yields. Emerging markets also benefited from recovering commodity prices.
The Fund
The Fund primarily invests in dividend-paying stocks and this year, with increased interest rate volatility, the Fund’s higher-yielding stocks performed very well. During the review period, we saw the yield on the 10- year Treasury note go from 2.03% in September of 2015 to a high of 2.37% in November of 2015 buoyed by the anticipation of the Fed’s interest rate hike of 25 basis points last December. Disappointing GDP numbers in the beginning of 2016 caused the market to sell off, as investors started buying the safety of
129 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
Treasuries and forced the yield back below 2%. By July, the yield on the 10-year Treasury note reached a low of 1.31%. High dividend-paying stocks rose as rates collapsed in late spring. At the end of the summer, with GDP and job growth showing signs of improvement, the Fed began to signal their intentions to raise rates by the end of 2016 and the yield on the 10-year Treasury started back toward the 1.75% range.
The direction of these moves can play a role in the performance of dividend-paying stocks. When interest rates fell over the past few years, fixed income investors looked to dividend-paying equities to supplement their income when money market accounts and CD’s no longer offered compelling returns. When rates eventually rise again, and those products become more competitive, investors will likely return to fixed income products as they offer lower volatility compared to equities. This past year stocks whose yield is greater than 3.08% were up over 6.2%. Investors who cannot find adequate yield in fixed income securities bid up higher-yielding equities to a point one could argue was over-valued. Typically, companies with higher yields have much slower earnings growth and companies offer the higher yield as an incentive to invest. The only way to get meaningful stock appreciation is through earnings growth or multiple expansions. We have seen this expansion of multiples mainly in the Utilities, Staples and REIT sectors.
The Fund’s Healthcare holdings had strong returns this past year led by our large-cap pharmaceutical holdings. Merck has had a tremendous year with the stock rising over 30%. Earnings have been strong, but Merck’s pipeline has been garnering all the attention lately. Merck recently presented Phase 3 data on Keytruda, their first line lung cancer drug and the results were very strong. It is widely believed Keytruda will become the dominant drug used in the treatment of lung cancer because the results show superior effectiveness over chemotherapy. This drug, by some estimates, could see sales of over $8 billion in the coming years. Merck’s biggest competitor in the lung cancer space came out with disappointing results, which we believe solidify Merck’s dominance for the next few years. Baxalta was a name the Fund owned after it was spun off from our holding in Baxter. Baxalta specializes in hematology, immunology and oncology and was showing nice earnings growth. Shire Plc offered to buy them for $32 billion at the beginning of the year. The combination of the two companies gives Shire Plc several strong multi-billion dollar franchises with global distribution. The Fund received shares of Shire Plc as part of the deal.
The Fund’s other large-cap pharmaceutical stocks all had a good year, as Johnson & Johnson was up over 30% and AbbVie gained 20%. These stocks offered steady earnings growth and have supported high dividends and have participated in the trade for yield over the past year. Chubb, a stock we wrote about in last year’s letter, performed as we anticipated. ACE acquired Chubb last year and assumed Chubb’s name. Earnings have been strong, pricing has been good and the cost cuts have come in higher than expected. The stock is up over 24% in the past 12 months and is one of our biggest financial holdings. We continue to see the benefits of this combination playing out over the coming years, especially if we are in a rising interest rate environment.
130 |
A relatively new holding in the Fund, Applied Materials, was purchased back in March and the stock price is up over 100% from where we made our initial investment. We were able to correctly identify a new spending cycle for semiconductor equipment in two main areas, 3D NAND and the adoption of OLED (organic light emitting diode) display for mobile devices and television. 3D NAND is the next generation for memory chips that will allow for both faster and greater capacity for flash storage. OLED is widely recognized as the best display for both mobile devices and televisions. It is expected that Apple will adopt OLED for its next generation iPhone and Samsung is currently using OLED in their mobile devices. When capacity comes on and manufacturing yields improve we will likely see a large adoption of OLED televisions in the coming years. The new wild card is demand from China. Historically, China has not been a player in semiconductor manufacturing, but they are spending heavily to become a factor in global foundry production.
The Fund’s underperformance primarily came from not owning three large-cap non-dividend-paying Technology stocks that are in the top ten in terms of size in the S&P 500 Index. Amazon was up over 63% this past year, Facebook gained over 42% and Google advanced over 25%. These stocks provided roughly 150 basis points of outperformance for the S&P 500 Index; but because they do not pay a dividend, the Fund did not invest in those securities. Our investment focus remains on both capital appreciation and yield.
The Fund also added a new investment strategy in the past year. We are now selling covered calls on securities that we own and are looking to sell at specific prices. Selling covered calls allows the Fund to take in cash for securities we would otherwise be selling in the marketplace, and that cash is added to the total return of the security.
As we look ahead, we believe dividend-paying stocks should be a focus for any investor. Dividend-paying stocks tend to outperform non-dividend-paying stocks when interest rates are either rising or falling. If we look at stock returns since the 1970’s, dividend-paying stocks have outperformed the S&P 500 Index. The Fund is focused on finding those stocks that not only provide yield and stability, but also provide dividend growth and appreciation.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
131 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.21% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,058.59 | $ 6.23 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.95 | $ 6.11 | |
Class B Shares | 2.05% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,054.74 | $10.53 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.75 | $10.33 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.84% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,061.28 | $ 4.33 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.80 | $ 4.24 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.80% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,061.58 | $ 4.12 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.00 | $ 4.04 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
132 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Equity Income Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Equity Income Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/06 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
133 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Advisor Class were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Advisor Class, the “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 9.09%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
† The Index return is for ten years. The Index return since inception of the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares is 12.01%.
134 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—94.4% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—9.3% | ||||
65,000 | American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | $ 1,160,900 | ||
30,568 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 1,673,292 | ||
92,700 | Comcast Corporation – Special Shares “A” | 6,149,718 | ||
30,000 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 2,139,600 | ||
275,000 | Ford Motor Company | 3,319,250 | ||
10,800 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 912,060 | ||
47,200 | Home Depot, Inc. | 6,073,696 | ||
105,961 | Johnson Controls International, PLC | 4,930,365 | ||
25,000 | L Brands, Inc. | 1,769,250 | ||
14,000 | Lear Corporation | 1,697,080 | ||
36,100 | McDonald’s Corporation | 4,164,496 | ||
103,950 | Newell Brands, Inc. | 5,474,007 | ||
157,300 | Regal Entertainment Group – Class “A” | 3,421,275 | ||
57,933 | Time Warner, Inc. | 4,612,046 | ||
33,500 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 2,189,895 | ||
21,900 | Walt Disney Company | 2,033,634 | ||
8,800 | Whirlpool Corporation | 1,427,008 | ||
29,000 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 1,952,570 | ||
55,100,142 | ||||
Consumer Staples—9.0% | ||||
125,000 | Altria Group, Inc. | 7,903,750 | ||
92,200 | Coca-Cola Company | 3,901,904 | ||
76,700 | CVS Health Corporation | 6,825,533 | ||
20,000 | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. | 1,826,200 | ||
18,300 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 2,308,362 | ||
94,117 | Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV (ADR) | 2,131,750 | ||
18,066 | Kraft Heinz Company | 1,617,088 | ||
63,500 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 6,906,895 | ||
84,500 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 8,215,090 | ||
81,400 | Procter & Gamble Company | 7,305,650 | ||
54,400 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 3,923,328 | ||
52,865,550 | ||||
Energy—7.5% | ||||
89,400 | Chevron Corporation | 9,201,048 | ||
96,500 | ConocoPhillips | 4,194,855 | ||
83,000 | Devon Energy Corporation | 3,661,130 | ||
77,900 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 6,799,112 | ||
34,600 | Halliburton Company | 1,552,848 |
135 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Energy (continued) | ||||
62,900 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | $ 2,553,111 | ||
77,500 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 5,651,300 | ||
92,200 | PBF Energy, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,087,408 | ||
75,500 | Royal Dutch Shell, PLC – Class “A” (ADR) | 3,780,285 | ||
30,000 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 2,359,200 | ||
86,300 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 2,397,414 | ||
44,237,711 | ||||
Financials—16.2% | ||||
151,800 | AllianceBernstein Holding, LP | 3,461,040 | ||
45,000 | American Express Company | 2,881,800 | ||
60,000 | American International Group, Inc. | 3,560,400 | ||
21,300 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 2,125,101 | ||
115,000 | Bank of New York Mellon Corporation | 4,586,200 | ||
151,900 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 4,209,149 | ||
70,010 | Chubb, Ltd. | 8,796,756 | ||
162,000 | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 4,003,020 | ||
75,000 | Discover Financial Services | 4,241,250 | ||
150,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 2,895,000 | ||
62,100 | Invesco, Ltd. | 1,941,867 | ||
95,000 | iShares S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index Fund (ETF) | 3,752,500 | ||
147,800 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 9,842,002 | ||
125,000 | MetLife, Inc. | 5,553,750 | ||
83,700 | Oritani Financial Corporation | 1,315,764 | ||
52,900 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 4,765,761 | ||
30,000 | Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. | 1,646,700 | ||
74,000 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 3,127,980 | ||
209,300 | Sterling Bancorp | 3,662,750 | ||
27,800 | Travelers Companies, Inc. | 3,184,490 | ||
108,300 | U.S. Bancorp | 4,644,987 | ||
90,000 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 1,634,400 | ||
215,500 | Wells Fargo & Company | 9,542,340 | ||
95,375,007 | ||||
Health Care—12.6% | ||||
106,100 | Abbott Laboratories | 4,486,969 | ||
101,100 | AbbVie, Inc. | 6,376,377 | ||
4,240 | * | Allergan, PLC | 976,514 | |
43,468 | Baxter International, Inc. | 2,069,077 | ||
28,000 | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 2,215,360 | ||
52,400 | GlaxoSmithKline, PLC (ADR) | 2,260,012 | ||
114,400 | Johnson & Johnson | 13,514,072 |
136 |
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Health Care (continued) | ||||
9,500 | McKesson Corporation | $ 1,584,125 | ||
55,094 | Medtronic, PLC | 4,760,122 | ||
190,211 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 11,871,069 | ||
394,124 | Pfizer, Inc. | 13,348,980 | ||
85,000 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 2,310,300 | ||
8,256 | Shire, PLC (ADR) | 1,600,508 | ||
25,500 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 4,056,030 | ||
51,952 | Zoetis, Inc. | 2,702,024 | ||
74,131,539 | ||||
Industrials—10.7% | ||||
28,600 | 3M Company | 5,040,178 | ||
12,700 | A.O. Smith Corporation | 1,254,633 | ||
55,000 | Eaton Corporation, PLC | 3,614,050 | ||
30,000 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 1,089,000 | |
14,800 | General Dynamics Corporation | 2,296,368 | ||
366,400 | General Electric Company | 10,852,768 | ||
61,900 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 7,216,921 | ||
45,000 | Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 2,627,100 | ||
33,600 | Ingersoll-Rand, PLC | 2,282,784 | ||
66,450 | ITT, Inc. | 2,381,568 | ||
100,000 | Koninklijke Philips NV (ADR) | 2,959,000 | ||
19,000 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 4,554,680 | ||
70,000 | Nielsen Holdings, PLC | 3,749,900 | ||
23,000 | Snap-On, Inc. | 3,495,080 | ||
48,700 | United Parcel Service, Inc. – Class “B” | 5,325,832 | ||
42,500 | United Technologies Corporation | 4,318,000 | ||
63,057,862 | ||||
Information Technology—14.5% | ||||
54,900 | Apple, Inc. | 6,206,445 | ||
185,000 | Applied Materials, Inc. | 5,577,750 | ||
28,600 | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2,522,520 | ||
20,000 | Broadcom, Ltd. | 3,450,400 | ||
342,100 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 10,851,412 | ||
14,489 | * | Dell Technologies, Inc. – Class “V” | 692,574 | |
135,000 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 3,071,250 | ||
140,000 | HP, Inc. | 2,174,200 | ||
174,700 | Intel Corporation | 6,594,925 | ||
90,000 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | 2,165,400 | ||
59,600 | Lam Research Corporation | 5,644,716 | ||
47,600 | Microchip Technology, Inc. | 2,957,864 |
137 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Information Technology (continued) | ||||
225,000 | Microsoft Corporation | $ 12,960,000 | ||
87,800 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 6,014,300 | ||
70,000 | Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (ADR) | 3,625,300 | ||
108,300 | Symantec Corporation | 2,718,330 | ||
39,200 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 2,523,696 | ||
57,000 | Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 2,723,460 | ||
50,000 | Western Digital Corporation | 2,923,500 | ||
85,398,042 | ||||
Materials—3.5% | ||||
86,900 | Dow Chemical Company | 4,504,027 | ||
57,600 | DuPont (E.I.) de Nemours & Company | 3,857,472 | ||
132,300 | * | Ferro Corporation | 1,827,063 | |
73,000 | International Paper Company | 3,502,540 | ||
31,700 | LyondellBasell Industries NV – Class “A” | 2,556,922 | ||
60,700 | Olin Corporation | 1,245,564 | ||
30,000 | Steel Dynamics, Inc. | 749,700 | ||
50,000 | WestRock Company | 2,424,000 | ||
20,667,288 | ||||
Real Estate—3.4% | ||||
166,400 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 4,624,256 | ||
108,000 | Chesapeake Lodging Trust (REIT) | 2,473,200 | ||
61,000 | iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF (ETF) | 4,919,040 | ||
26,700 | Select Income REIT (REIT) | 718,230 | ||
95,000 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 1,215,050 | ||
70,500 | Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. (REIT) | 2,746,680 | ||
151,800 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 3,372,996 | ||
20,069,452 | ||||
Telecommunication Services—3.7% | ||||
260,730 | AT&T, Inc. | 10,588,245 | ||
222,800 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 11,581,144 | ||
22,169,389 | ||||
Utilities—4.0% | ||||
36,500 | American Electric Power Company, Inc. | 2,343,665 | ||
100,000 | CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | 2,323,000 | ||
35,000 | Dominion Resources, Inc. | 2,599,450 | ||
35,000 | Duke Energy Corporation | 2,801,400 | ||
113,000 | Exelon Corporation | 3,761,770 |
138 |
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Utilities (continued) | |||||||
17,100 | NextEra Energy, Inc. | $ 2,091,672 | |||||
24,000 | Portland General Electric Company | 1,022,160 | |||||
130,000 | PPL Corporation | 4,494,100 | |||||
41,200 | Vectren Corporation | 2,068,240 | |||||
23,505,457 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $404,513,169) | 556,577,439 | ||||||
PREFERRED STOCKS—1.6% | |||||||
Financials—.6% | |||||||
800 | Citizens Financial Group, Inc., Series A, 5.5%, 2049 | 786,000 | |||||
102,800 | JPMorgan Chase & Co., Series Y, 6.125%, 2020 | 2,784,852 | |||||
3,570,852 | |||||||
Health Care—.4% | |||||||
2,600 | Allergan, PLC, Series A, 5.5%, 2018 | 2,136,238 | |||||
Real Estate—.6% | |||||||
50,500 | Digital Realty Trust, Inc., Series G (REIT), 5.875%, 2049 | 1,293,810 | |||||
Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. (REIT) | |||||||
46,000 | Series F, 7.125%, 2049 | 1,202,900 | |||||
49,000 | Series G, 6.75%, 2049 | 1,291,150 | |||||
3,787,860 | |||||||
Total Value of Preferred Stocks (cost $9,629,279) | 9,494,950 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—3.6% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$ 3,000M | 0.28%, 10/13/2016 | 2,999,850 | |||||
11,000M | 0.295%, 10/21/2016 | 10,999,010 | |||||
3,000M | 0.27%, 10/24/2016 | 2,999,685 | |||||
2,000M | 0.285%, 11/8/2016 | 1,999,580 | |||||
2,000M | 0.27%, 11/23/2016 | 1,999,406 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $20,996,002) | 20,997,531 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $435,138,450) | 99.6 | % | 587,069,920 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .4 | 2,738,409 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $589,808,329 |
* | Non-income producing |
139 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 556,577,439 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 556,577,439 | ||||
Preferred Stocks | 9,494,950 | — | — | 9,494,950 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 20,997,531 | — | 20,997,531 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 566,072,389 | $ | 20,997,531 | $ | — | $ | 587,069,920 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks |
and preferred stocks. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
140 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
GLOBAL FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Global Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 6.03% for Class A shares, 5.29% for Class B shares, 6.48% for Advisor Class shares and 6.61% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 0.3 cents per share for Class A shares, none for Class B shares, 1.0 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 1.1 cents per share for Institutional Class shares. In addition, the Fund distributed capital gains of 39.7 cents per share on each class of shares.
Global equities advanced during the trailing twelve month period ending September 30, 2016. The period began with a broad global advance, as increasing signs of extended monetary policy accommodation by major central banks supported risk assets. After much anticipation, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) delivered its first rate hike since 2006 in December, approving a small increase in the federal funds rate. The market initially reacted positively to the news, but remained volatile through the end of 2015 as investors digested the impact of the rate increase and global economic development.
Worries about a growth slowdown in China also dominated the market narrative toward the end of 2015. Volatility in the market continued into 2016, as Chinese stocks plunged in early January, sparking a global risk-off trade and resulting in a double-digit decline in most major indices for the first six weeks of the year. Once again, extended accommodative monetary policy by major central banks helped support risk assets, and the market rallied sharply.
After a lengthy and at times acrimonious campaign, the British electorate voted to leave the European Union (Brexit). After the vote, global equities sharply sold off before quickly bouncing back, as expectations for continued accommodative monetary policy from central banks around the globe helped to stoke investors’ risk appetites. While the Fed signaled a higher probability of a rate hike before year-end, market participants appeared more fixated on the downshift in the dot plot (rate expectations of each member) toward the end of the period.
The Fund lagged the MSCI All Country World Index for the period, with the majority of underperformance occurring in the first half of 2016. The outcome of our process is a portfolio diversified across sectors, regions, investment insights and types of companies. However, the Fund may face short-term relative performance headwinds during extreme market periods when one factor dominates market performance, as extreme risk aversion did during the Chinese growth scare in the first quarter and the Brexit vote in the second quarter.
Weak security selection in the Consumer Discretionary and Financials sectors weighed on relative performance during the period. Sky, the largest pay TV provider in the UK, was the top detractor within Consumer Discretionary names and the Fund overall. The outcome of the UK referendum put significant downward pressure on the British pound and fears of a UK economic slowdown weighed on subscriber growth. Our outlook for the company remains intact, and we believe the stock has significant upside potential.
141 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
The Financials sector, particularly banks, declined more than the broader market at the beginning of 2016 and our bank exposure detracted from relative performance.
Positive selection within Information Technology and Industrials partially offset these results. China-based e-commerce leader, Alibaba, was the top contributor within Information Technology during the period. Shares of Alibaba advanced after beating quarterly earnings consensus estimates twice during the period. Alibaba has additional assets that we believe are undermonetized and underappreciated by the market, such as users’ data, cloud computing, payments, and a one-stop service platform for Chinese small-to-medium enterprises.
Sector allocation, a residual result of our bottom-up stock selection process, also weighed on relative returns. Underweight allocations to the strong performing Energy and Materials sectors more than offset positive contributions from the Fund’s overweight in Information Technology. A frictional cash position in a rising market also detracted from relative performance. On a regional basis, security selection within North America and Europe ex UK detracted the most from relative performance, while an underweight to the UK and selection within Japan contributed.
As of the end of the period, the Fund was most overweight the Industrials and Information Technology sectors, and most underweight Financials and Telecommunication Services. From a regional perspective, the Fund was most overweight North America and Europe (ex UK), and most underweight Asia Pacific and emerging markets.
Our economic outlook remains constructive. We continue to think the global economy will be stable, but slow growing, despite concerns for potential destabilization post-Brexit, China’s debt burden, and the very likely scenario under which the Fed starts to raise interest rates again. As we look across the opportunity set, we are still finding growth in this slower growth environment, as well as companies that can improve their returns on capital whether from industry consolidation, efficiency measures, or benefiting from a change in regulation.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
*Effective September 1, 2016, S&P Dow Jones Indices and MSCI implemented a new Real Estate sector under the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS); holdings in this sector were previously classified as Financials. The attribution analysis of the Financials sector includes real estate for the period starting January 1, 2016 through August 31, 2016.
142 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GLOBAL FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.46% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,045.84 | $ 7.47 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,017.70 | $ 7.36 | |
Class B Shares | 2.26% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,042.85 | $11.54 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,013.70 | $11.38 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.05% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,049.44 | $ 5.38 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.75 | $ 5.30 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 1.01% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,049.15 | $ 5.17 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.95 | $ 5.10 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
143 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GLOBAL FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Global Fund (Class A shares) and the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) All Country World Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Global Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/06 with a theoretical investment in the MSCI All Country World Index (the “Index”). The Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging market country indices. The Index consists of 46 country indices including 23 developed and 23 emerging market country indices. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested.
144 |
Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (0.08)%, 10.02% and 4.00%, respectively. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 1.30%, 10.23% and 4.18%, respectively. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 6.43% and 7.89%, respectively. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 6.59% and 8.04%, respectively. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
† The Index return is for ten years. The Index return since inception of the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares is 7.17%.
145 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS—97.6% | |||
United States—64.1% | |||
29,550 | Accenture, PLC – Class “A” | $ 3,610,124 | |
18,470 | Advance Auto Parts, Inc. | 2,754,246 | |
93,300 | Air Lease Corporation | 2,666,514 | |
44,184 | * | Allergan, PLC | 10,176,017 |
27,846 | * | Alliance Data Systems Corporation | 5,973,802 |
12,955 | * | Alphabet, Inc. – Class “C” | 10,069,792 |
6,307 | * | Amazon.com, Inc. | 5,280,914 |
8,220 | AMETEK, Inc. | 392,752 | |
35,920 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | 2,275,891 | |
40,549 | Baker Hughes, Inc. | 2,046,508 | |
468,990 | Bank of America Corporation | 7,339,694 | |
26,575 | Becton, Dickinson & Company | 4,776,325 | |
18,301 | BlackRock, Inc. | 6,633,381 | |
125,708 | * | Boston Scientific Corporation | 2,991,850 |
175,120 | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 9,442,470 | |
48,350 | * | Cerner Corporation | 2,985,613 |
80,568 | * | Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation – Class “A” | 3,843,899 |
138,640 | Colgate-Palmolive Company | 10,278,770 | |
165,670 | Coty, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,893,245 | |
24,369 | Danaher Corporation | 1,910,286 | |
122,884 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 8,764,087 | |
85,212 | Delta Air Lines, Inc. | 3,353,944 | |
33,290 | EOG Resources, Inc. | 3,219,476 | |
28,467 | Equifax, Inc. | 3,831,089 | |
111,062 | Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. – Class “A” | 9,835,651 | |
39,016 | Expedia, Inc. | 4,553,948 | |
53,600 | FedEx Corporation | 9,362,848 | |
65,128 | Fortive Corporation | 3,315,015 | |
65,640 | Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc. | 3,813,684 | |
44,150 | General Dynamics Corporation | 6,850,314 | |
53,895 | Global Payments, Inc. | 4,136,980 | |
242,280 | Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc. | 5,555,480 | |
73,030 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 8,514,568 | |
86,780 | * | IHS Markit, Ltd. | 3,258,589 |
18,480 | * | Incyte Corporation | 1,742,479 |
295,861 | Intel Corporation | 11,168,753 | |
37,394 | IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. | 10,072,448 | |
49,967 | Kansas City Southern, Inc. | 4,662,920 | |
356,600 | Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 8,248,158 | |
66,481 | L Brands, Inc. | 4,704,860 | |
37,310 | Marriott International, Inc. | 2,512,082 |
146 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
United States (continued) | |||
190,407 | Microsoft Corporation | $ 10,967,443 | |
39,220 | * | Mobileye NV | 1,669,595 |
231,104 | Mondelez International, Inc. – Class “A” | 10,145,466 | |
11,366 | * | Monster Beverage Corporation | 1,668,643 |
62,365 | Nielsen Holdings, PLC | 3,340,893 | |
115,050 | NIKE, Inc. | 6,057,383 | |
53,870 | Northern Trust Corporation | 3,662,621 | |
49,069 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 4,420,626 | |
4,580 | * | Priceline.com, Inc. | 6,739,424 |
20,441 | Public Storage (REIT) | 4,561,205 | |
11,168 | * | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 4,489,759 |
24,890 | S&P Global, Inc. | 3,150,078 | |
75,529 | * | Salesforce.com, Inc. | 5,387,484 |
80,744 | * | ServiceNow, Inc. | 6,390,888 |
29,395 | * | Teledyne Technologies, Inc. | 3,172,602 |
53,945 | UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 7,552,300 | |
81,016 | VF Corporation | 4,540,947 | |
102,547 | Visa, Inc. – Class “A” | 8,480,637 | |
29,825 | * | WABCO Holdings, Inc. | 3,386,032 |
230,848 | WisdomTree Investments, Inc. | 2,375,426 | |
52,405 | * | Workday, Inc. – Class A | 4,805,014 |
178,138 | * | WPX Energy, Inc. | 2,349,640 |
330,133,572 | |||
United Kingdom—5.1% | |||
312,027 | * | Anglo American, PLC | 3,913,279 |
66,911 | AstraZeneca, PLC | 4,339,779 | |
203,880 | Compass Group, PLC | 3,950,651 | |
2,510,796 | * | Glencore, PLC | 6,904,103 |
610,067 | Sky, PLC | 7,069,161 | |
26,176,973 | |||
Japan—4.8% | |||
14,915 | Daito Trust Construction Company, Ltd. | 2,379,075 | |
351,000 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | 4,439,204 | |
166,050 | Seven & I Holdings Company, Ltd. | 7,789,555 | |
125,900 | Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 4,196,460 | |
160,400 | Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. | 6,064,529 | |
24,868,823 |
147 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Germany—4.8% | |||
57,318 | Beiersdorf AG | $ 5,405,415 | |
54,943 | Brenntag AG | 2,999,927 | |
540,753 | E.ON AG | 3,835,490 | |
150,597 | * | RWE AG | 2,594,283 |
11,030 | Siemens AG | 1,291,102 | |
227,421 | Vonovia SE | 8,610,774 | |
24,736,991 | |||
China—3.2% | |||
80,012 | * | Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd. (ADR) | 8,464,470 |
16,790 | * | Baidu.com, Inc. (ADR) | 3,056,955 |
1,542,000 | CNOOC, Ltd. | 1,912,490 | |
1,882,000 | PICC Property and Casualty Company, Ltd. | 3,115,476 | |
16,549,391 | |||
Netherlands—3.0% | |||
86,110 | * | AerCap Holdings NV | 3,314,374 |
74,380 | * | Mylan NV (ADR) | 2,835,366 |
90,142 | * | NXP Semiconductors NV | 9,195,385 |
15,345,125 | |||
France—2.9% | |||
117,739 | Airbus Group SE | 7,121,028 | |
22,548 | BNP Paribas SA | 1,159,328 | |
44,444 | Essilor International SA | 5,731,553 | |
17,408 | Total SA | 824,650 | |
14,836,559 | |||
Switzerland—1.9% | |||
177,049 | LafargeHolcim, Ltd. | 9,567,754 | |
Belgium—1.8% | |||
71,695 | Anheuser-Busch InBev NV | 9,390,846 | |
Italy—1.7% | |||
102,068 | Banca Generali SpA | 1,958,370 | |
131,117 | Eni SpA | 1,888,271 | |
282,438 | FinecoBank Banca Fineco SpA | 1,635,570 | |
69,590 | Luxottica Group SpA | 3,323,972 | |
8,806,183 |
148 |
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Spain—1.0% | |||||||
398,325 | Repsol SA | $ 5,403,089 | |||||
India—1.0% | |||||||
25,300 | HDFC Bank, Ltd. (ADR) | 1,818,817 | |||||
936,065 | ICICI Bank, Ltd. | 3,545,040 | |||||
5,363,857 | |||||||
South Korea—.9% | |||||||
121,186 | SK Hynix, Inc. | 4,423,369 | |||||
Hong Kong—.8% | |||||||
162,498 | Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing, Ltd. | 4,269,647 | |||||
Australia—.3% | |||||||
211,227 | Westfield Corporation (REIT) | 1,572,979 | |||||
Brazil—.3% | |||||||
144,775 | * | Petroleo Brasileiro SA (ADR) | 1,350,751 | ||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $452,023,727) | 502,795,909 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.7% | |||||||
United States | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$3,000M | 0.295%, 10/21/2016 | 2,999,730 | |||||
3,000M | 0.27%, 10/24/2016 | 2,999,685 | |||||
3,000M | 0.285%, 11/10/2016 | 2,999,334 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $8,998,041) | 8,998,749 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $461,021,768) | 99.3 | % | 511,794,658 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .7 | 3,474,331 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $515,268,989 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
149 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2016
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 330,133,572 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 330,133,572 | ||||
United Kingdom | 26,176,973 | — | — | 26,176,973 | ||||||||
Japan | 24,868,823 | — | — | 24,868,823 | ||||||||
Germany | 24,736,991 | — | — | 24,736,991 | ||||||||
China | 16,549,391 | — | — | 16,549,391 | ||||||||
Netherlands | 15,345,125 | — | — | 15,345,125 | ||||||||
France | 14,836,559 | — | — | 14,836,559 | ||||||||
Switzerland | 9,567,754 | — | — | 9,567,754 | ||||||||
Belgium | 9,390,846 | — | — | 9,390,846 | ||||||||
Italy | 8,806,183 | — | — | 8,806,183 | ||||||||
Spain | 5,403,089 | — | — | 5,403,089 | ||||||||
India | 5,363,857 | — | — | 5,363,857 | ||||||||
South Korea | 4,423,369 | — | — | 4,423,369 | ||||||||
Hong Kong | 4,269,647 | — | — | 4,269,647 | ||||||||
Australia | 1,572,979 | — | — | 1,572,979 | ||||||||
Brazil | 1,350,751 | — | — | 1,350,751 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 8,998,749 | — | 8,998,749 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 502,795,909 | $ | 8,998,749 | $ | — | $ | 511,794,658 |
During the year ended September 30, 2016, there were no transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments that had a material inpact to the Fund. This does not include transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments due to the Fund utilizing international fair value pricing during the period (see Note 1A). Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
Transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 securities as of September 30, 2016 resulted from securities priced previously with an official close price (Level 1 securities) or securities fair valued by the Valuation Committee (Level 2 securities). Transfers from Level 2 to Level 1 as of September 30, 2016 were $100,400,287. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
150 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Growth & Income Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 11.72% for Class A shares, 10.82% for Class B shares, 12.18% for Advisor Class shares and 12.18% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 23.5 cents per share for Class A shares, 7.7 cents per share for Class B shares, 28.6 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 29.6 cents per share for Institutional Class shares. In addition, the Fund distributed capital gains of 93.4 cents per share on each class of shares.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell-off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4%, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move
151 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international bonds fell into negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
The Equity Market
Overall, U.S. equities (measured by the S&P 500 TR Index) posted a strong return of 15.43% for the 12 months ending September 30th. However, they experienced turbulent swings during this period. U.S. equity markets started the review period on a strong note, rallying 8.44% in October 2015 as they were recovering from the August and September sell-off. This was later followed by double-digit losses, amid worries about China, global growth and falling oil prices. Most of those fears subsided in mid-February as China’s markets stabilized, oil producers talked about decreasing supply, and Janet Yellen implied there would be fewer rate hikes than expected in 2016. Then, markets strongly rebounded from the February 11th bottom and gained almost 17% by the June 23rd Brexit vote. Markets then lost over 5% in the two days following the Brexit vote, followed by another strong rally which lasted until mid-July. Markets then stayed calm for the rest of the summer before volatility returned in September.
Overall, mid-cap stocks (measured by the S&P Midcap 400 Index) and small caps (Russell 2000 Index) posted similar returns to large caps, returning 15.33% and 15.46% for the period. However, they experienced much wider swings within the period, especially small caps. Large caps led the market during the fourth quarter of 2015, while small caps outperformed during the third quarter of 2016.
Higher-yielding stocks, including Utilities and real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), outperformed for most of the review period, supported by the low yielding environment and lack of other higher-yielding options. However, they became expensive and fell out of favor in August and September as economic data hinted that the Fed might increase rates by the end of the year. Overall, the Dow Jones U.S. Select Dividend Index and Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index returned 22.24% and 17.70%, respectively, for the past 12 months. All of the S&P 500 sectors ended the review period in positive territory, ranging from 7.40% (Financials) to 26.82% (Telecom Services).
International equities were positive as well. Developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada (measured by the MSCI EAFE Index) finished the review period up 7.06%. Emerging markets (the MSCI EM Index) outperformed developed markets with a return of 17.21%. This was a result of negative yields on many developed market bonds which increased demand for emerging market assets with positive yields. Emerging markets also benefited from recovering commodity prices.
152 |
The Fund
During the period under review, the Fund’s results were driven by a generally favorable market backdrop characterized by periods of extreme low volatility, interrupted by several short-lived market drops and bouts of high volatility, like the UK Brexit vote in June and the Chinese market sell off in January of 2016. While macro trends showed gradual, but uneven, improving economic conditions over the course of the year, potential interest rate actions from the Fed hung over the markets, keeping stock markets fixated. This also had the effect of perpetuating the “yield” trade, where fixed income and equity investors sought out income producing investments, driving up the prices of that market subsector. The rally also took on a “risk on” flavor, as investors enjoyed continued low borrowing costs to indulge in higher risk (beta), lower-quality investments, narrowing the field for long-term market participants.
While absolute performance was positive, relative performance of the Fund lagged versus the market benchmark. Stock selection was solid, but sector allocations proved more problematic. Among sectors, Technology represented the bright spot for the Fund contributing most to absolute return. Investments in the Healthcare and Consumer Staples sectors also contributed. Among the laggards, shares of Industrials, Utilities, Financials and Materials sectors hurt performance on a relative basis, as the Fund was underweighted versus the index. Among market capitalization segments, the Fund’s large-cap stocks performed in line with the markets, while the small-cap and mid-cap segments lagged. The Fund allocated 72.8% of its holdings to large-cap stocks, 12.7% to mid-cap stocks and 14.5% to small-cap stocks (ranges defined by Lipper) as of September 30, 2016.
Among individual performers, shares of Technology stocks shone brightest. Semiconductor makers Broadcom (+38%), Intel (+25%), and Qualcomm (+27%) rallied strongly reflecting solid smartphone adoption as well as a rebound in enterprise computer spending. Likewise, telecom and networking equipment maker Cisco Systems rose 21%. Packaged software firms Microsoft and Symantec rallied similarly. Merger and acquisition activity also continued to benefit Fund share holdings, as shares of EMC Corporation and Sandisk finalized deals during the fiscal year.
Among healthcare names, strong pharmaceutical results buoyed Johnson & Johnson, which returned +27% for the year. Other large-cap pharmaceutical firms were also strong: Merck and animal drug maker, Zoetis returned +26% each. Medical product suppliers, Thermo Fisher Scientific returned +30%, while Medtronic was +29% amidst healthy surgical volumes and progress with the integration of its Covidien subsidiary. Shares of Baxalta (former biopharmaceutical spin-off of Baxter) returned +46% during the year, as it was acquired by Shire PLC from Ireland in June.
153 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Among Consumer Staples names, shares of tobacco makers Philip Morris International (+23%) and Altria Group (+16%) were the top contributors. Despite consistent results, these shares benefited from the influx of yield-oriented investors seeking dividend plays. Both shares sport dividend yields near 4%. Tyson Foods—the global protein (pork, chicken, beef) leader—rose 73% on increased demand, good pricing and continued benefits from its purchase of the Hillshire Farms packaged food business.
Among laggards, the Industrials sector was a disappointment, as the Fund was underweight versus peers. Additionally, shares of ManpowerGroup—one of the largest global staffing firms—fell 12% after the surprising Brexit vote outcome in June. Two-thirds of the company’s revenue is derived in Europe. The Brexit vote threatens slower European economic growth, which tends to be a negative for all staffing firms. Financials was also a source of underperformance. We have maintained an underweight versus the benchmark over the past several years, as increased regulatory scrutiny has limited profit upside. The underweighting versus the benchmark hurt the Fund again this year.
Finally, the persistence of continued low interest rates (particularly following the UK Brexit vote) continued to benefit the relative performance strength of higher dividend-paying stocks, perceived as stable. The Fund’s underweighting of the Utilities sector proved a drag on relative performance. While not typically core to the Fund’s strategy of emphasizing growth first, and income as a secondary consideration, this sector was a key beneficiary of this year’s market flows. Partially offsetting this were the Fund’s positions in Utility-like names: Telecommunications giants AT&T and Verizon, which returned +22% and +25% for the fiscal year, respectively.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
154 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.16% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,064.77 | $5.99 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.20 | $5.86 | |
Class B Shares | 1.92% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,060.55 | $9.89 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.40 | $9.67 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.76% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,066.88 | $3.93 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.20 | $3.84 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.74% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,066.87 | $3.82 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.30 | $3.74 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
155 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Growth & Income Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Growth & Income Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/06 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
156 |
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Advisor Class and Institutional Class were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Advisor Class, the “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 9.34%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 9.38%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
†The Index return is for ten years. The Index return since inception of the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares is 12.01%.
157 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS—99.1% | |||
Consumer Discretionary—19.3% | |||
425,000 | American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | $ 7,590,500 | |
300,000 | Big Lots, Inc. | 14,325,000 | |
281,500 | BorgWarner, Inc. | 9,903,170 | |
425,000 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 23,264,500 | |
307,500 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 21,930,900 | |
375,000 | DSW, Inc. – Class “A” | 7,680,000 | |
169,600 | Foot Locker, Inc. | 11,485,312 | |
675,000 | Ford Motor Company | 8,147,250 | |
137,100 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 11,578,095 | |
180,000 | Home Depot, Inc. | 23,162,400 | |
400,530 | Johnson Controls International, PLC | 18,636,661 | |
220,000 | L Brands, Inc. | 15,569,400 | |
164,700 | Lear Corporation | 19,964,934 | |
230,000 | Magna International, Inc. | 9,878,500 | |
220,000 | * | Michaels Companies, Inc. | 5,317,400 |
924,450 | Newell Brands, Inc. | 48,681,537 | |
87,400 | Oxford Industries, Inc. | 5,916,980 | |
198,300 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 9,554,094 | |
275,000 | * | Select Comfort Corporation | 5,940,000 |
485,000 | Stein Mart, Inc. | 3,079,750 | |
300,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 19,611,000 | |
160,000 | Walt Disney Company | 14,857,600 | |
60,000 | Whirlpool Corporation | 9,729,600 | |
170,000 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 11,446,100 | |
337,250,683 | |||
Consumer Staples—9.8% | |||
60,300 | AdvancePierre Foods Holdings, Inc. | 1,661,868 | |
480,000 | Altria Group, Inc. | 30,350,400 | |
54,100 | B&G Foods, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,660,638 | |
360,000 | Coca-Cola Company | 15,235,200 | |
290,000 | CVS Health Corporation | 25,807,100 | |
560,404 | Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV (ADR) | 12,693,151 | |
139,200 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 9,017,376 | |
165,000 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 17,947,050 | |
295,000 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 28,679,900 | |
105,000 | Procter & Gamble Company | 9,423,750 | |
80,000 | Tyson Foods, Inc. – Class “A” | 5,973,600 | |
160,000 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 11,539,200 | |
170,989,233 |
158 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
Energy—5.9% | |||
138,000 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | $ 8,743,680 | |
35,000 | Chevron Corporation | 3,602,200 | |
230,000 | ConocoPhillips | 9,998,100 | |
175,000 | Devon Energy Corporation | 7,719,250 | |
200,000 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 17,456,000 | |
100,000 | Hess Corporation | 5,362,000 | |
300,000 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 4,743,000 | |
339,498 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 13,780,224 | |
100,000 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 7,292,000 | |
100,000 | PBF Energy, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,264,000 | |
115,000 | Phillips 66 | 9,263,250 | |
48,300 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 3,798,312 | |
350,200 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 9,728,556 | |
103,750,572 | |||
Financials—11.9% | |||
250,000 | American Express Company | 16,010,000 | |
215,000 | American International Group, Inc. | 12,758,100 | |
153,000 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 15,264,810 | |
130,000 | Chubb, Ltd. | 16,334,500 | |
515,000 | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 12,725,650 | |
325,000 | Discover Financial Services | 18,378,750 | |
550,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 10,615,000 | |
25,000 | iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (ETF) | 3,867,750 | |
100,000 | iShares Russell 2000 ETF (ETF) | 12,421,000 | |
396,730 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 26,418,251 | |
210,500 | MetLife, Inc. | 9,352,515 | |
56,300 | Morgan Stanley | 1,804,978 | |
150,000 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 13,513,500 | |
250,000 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 10,567,500 | |
355,000 | U.S. Bancorp | 15,225,950 | |
287,050 | Wells Fargo & Company | 12,710,574 | |
207,968,828 | |||
Health Care—18.9% | |||
425,000 | Abbott Laboratories | 17,973,250 | |
335,000 | AbbVie, Inc. | 21,128,450 | |
35,000 | * | Allergan, PLC | 8,060,850 |
260,000 | * | AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. | 8,286,200 |
168,669 | Baxter International, Inc. | 8,028,644 | |
170,000 | Cardinal Health, Inc. | 13,209,000 |
159 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Health Care (continued) | |||
105,600 | * | Centene Corporation | $ 7,070,976 |
160,000 | * | Express Scripts Holding Company | 11,284,800 |
320,000 | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 25,318,400 | |
262,500 | Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. | 16,269,750 | |
270,625 | Johnson & Johnson | 31,968,931 | |
9,375 | * | Mallinckrodt, PLC | 654,187 |
70,900 | McKesson Corporation | 11,822,575 | |
160,000 | Medtronic, PLC | 13,824,000 | |
325,000 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 20,283,250 | |
120,000 | * | Mylan NV | 4,574,400 |
3,000 | * | Patheon NV (ADR) | 88,890 |
869,301 | Pfizer, Inc. | 29,443,225 | |
298,100 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 8,102,358 | |
64,162 | Shire, PLC (ADR) | 12,438,445 | |
260,000 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 41,355,600 | |
230,000 | * | VWR Corporation | 6,522,800 |
260,000 | Zoetis, Inc. | 13,522,600 | |
331,231,581 | |||
Industrials—8.3% | |||
140,000 | 3M Company | 24,672,200 | |
360,000 | General Electric Company | 10,663,200 | |
209,700 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 24,448,923 | |
55,000 | Ingersoll-Rand, PLC | 3,736,700 | |
226,700 | ITT, Inc. | 8,124,928 | |
200,000 | Koninklijke Philips NV (ADR) | 5,918,000 | |
20,000 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 4,794,400 | |
130,000 | ManpowerGroup, Inc. | 9,393,800 | |
90,300 | Nielsen Holdings, PLC | 4,837,371 | |
59,400 | Robert Half International, Inc. | 2,248,884 | |
125,000 | Snap-On, Inc. | 18,995,000 | |
110,400 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 826,896 | |
170,000 | Textron, Inc. | 6,757,500 | |
390,200 | Triton International, Ltd. | 5,146,738 | |
150,000 | United Technologies Corporation | 15,240,000 | |
145,804,540 | |||
Information Technology—18.0% | |||
310,000 | Apple, Inc. | 35,045,500 | |
625,000 | Applied Materials, Inc. | 18,843,750 | |
750,000 | ARRIS International, PLC | 21,247,500 |
160 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
Information Technology (continued) | |||
90,000 | Broadcom, Ltd. | $ 15,526,800 | |
900,000 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 28,548,000 | |
105,887 | * | Dell Technologies, Inc. – Class “V” | 5,061,399 |
250,000 | * | eBay, Inc. | 8,225,000 |
894,700 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 20,354,425 | |
583,775 | Intel Corporation | 22,037,506 | |
75,000 | International Business Machines Corporation | 11,913,750 | |
260,000 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | 6,255,600 | |
200,500 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 7,011,485 | |
625,000 | Microsoft Corporation | 36,000,000 | |
90,000 | * | NXP Semiconductors NV | 9,180,900 |
350,000 | Oracle Corporation | 13,748,000 | |
300,000 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 20,550,000 | |
61,800 | Sabre Corporation | 1,741,524 | |
617,200 | Symantec Corporation | 15,491,720 | |
85,400 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 5,498,052 | |
242,900 | Travelport Worldwide, Ltd. | 3,650,787 | |
140,000 | Western Digital Corporation | 8,185,800 | |
314,117,498 | |||
Materials—1.1% | |||
40,000 | Praxair, Inc. | 4,833,200 | |
135,000 | RPM International, Inc. | 7,252,200 | |
125,000 | Trinseo SA | 7,070,000 | |
19,155,400 | |||
Real Estate—2.4% | |||
570,000 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 15,840,300 | |
76,530 | Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 2,507,888 | |
661,267 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 8,457,605 | |
185,000 | Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. (REIT) | 7,207,600 | |
373,500 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 8,299,170 | |
42,312,563 | |||
Telecommunication Services—2.5% | |||
530,000 | AT&T, Inc. | 21,523,300 | |
425,000 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 22,091,500 | |
43,614,800 |
161 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Utilities—1.0% | |||||||
450,000 | Exelon Corporation | $ 14,980,500 | |||||
81,200 | NiSource, Inc. | 1,957,732 | |||||
16,938,232 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $1,124,163,423) | 1,733,133,930 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.0% | |||||||
$17,500M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.28%, 10/13/2016 (cost $17,498,366) | 17,499,125 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $1,141,661,789) | 100.1 | % | 1,750,633,055 | ||||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.1 | ) | (2,080,501) | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $1,748,552,554 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
162 |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 1,733,133,930 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,733,133,930 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 17,499,125 | — | 17,499,125 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 1,733,133,930 | $ | 17,499,125 | $ | — | $ | 1,750,633,055 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 163 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. The Fund was launched on August 1, 2016 and the comments below reflect the period August 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was –0.90% for Class A shares, –0.90% for Advisor Class shares and –0.90% for Institutional Class shares. The Fund did not distribute any dividends or capital gains.
U.S. equities were modestly positive during the partial period, despite heightened volatility in September. A confluence of worries contributed to the increased volatility, including uncertainty surrounding the U.S. presidential election and the Federal Reserve’s (“the Fed’s”) rate hike time-line, as well as tepid economic data and valuation concerns. However, some fairly dovish takeaways from the Fed’s September meeting helped equities rebound in the second half of the month. In particular, expectations for long-run U.S. growth and the pace of rate hikes were ratcheted lower by Federal Open Market Committee members. Finally, polls conducted after the first U.S. presidential debate favored Hillary Clinton over Donald Trump, leading to a temporary relief rally in riskier assets.
The Fund underperformed its benchmark (70% Russell 3000, 30% BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. 3-Month Treasury Bill Index) for the period.
The Fund’s active equity strategy weighed on returns for the period relative to the Russell 3000 Index. Security selection, particularly within the Healthcare and Information Technology sectors, detracted from performance. Pharmaceutical company Bristol-Myers Squibb accounted for the majority of security selection detraction during the period. The stock underperformed during the quarter after the company announced trial results that did not meet expectations for their leading drug, Opdivo, as a treatment in first line lung cancer. We remain positive on the company as we believe its unique drug assets in a number of different therapeutic categories support a strong growth outlook. Underweight exposure to the strong-performing information technology sector also detracted from relative results. Strong selection within Energy, Materials, and Financials partially offset these results.
The beta hedge, which is designed to reduce the Fund’s equity exposure through selling futures on U.S. indices, detracted from results during the period. Short exposure to the Russell 2000 Index weighed on performance, as the Index advanced during the period. The Fund’s tail risk management strategy, which is designed to reduce the risk of loss during sharp market declines, detracted from results as the S&P 500 Index advanced during the period.
164 |
Globally, we see varying degrees of improving momentum in the economic data coming from Europe, Japan and Emerging Markets, and solid data from the U.S. and China. In the U.S., a combination of stabilizing capital expenditures, an end to inventory destocking, and a still decent—albeit selective—consumer, support a more positive outlook domestically. The U.S. presidential election and Fed interest rate decisions are the key potentially transformative events in the coming quarter, although expectations of a December rate hike look well entrenched.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
165 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (8/1/16)* | (9/30/16) | (8/1/16–9/30/16)** |
Class A Shares | 1.75% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 991.00 | $2.90 | |
Hypothetical*** | $1,000.00 | $1,005.41 | $2.92 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.42% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 991.00 | $2.36 | |
Hypothetical*** | $1,000.00 | $1,005.96 | $2.37 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 1.31% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 991.00 | $2.17 | |
Hypothetical*** | $1,000.00 | $1,006.15 | $2.19 |
* | Commencement of operations. |
** | Actual expenses reflect only from the commencment of operations to the end of the period |
covered (August 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016). Therefore expenses shown are lower | |
than would be expected for a six-month period. Actual expenses for the six-month period will | |
be reflected in future reports. Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio multiplied by | |
the average account value over the period, multiplied by 61/366 (to reflect the inception period). | |
Expenses paid during the period are net of expenses waived and/or assumed. | |
*** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total value of investments. |
166 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS—94.3% | |||
Consumer Discretionary—10.9% | |||
1,263 | Advance Auto Parts, Inc. | $ 188,339 | |
289 | * | Amazon.com, Inc. | 241,983 |
2,407 | * | CarMax, Inc. | 128,413 |
2,737 | D.R. Horton, Inc. | 82,657 | |
649 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 46,287 | |
2,468 | DSW, Inc. – Class “A” | 50,545 | |
2,297 | Expedia, Inc. | 268,106 | |
212,339 | * | Global Brands Group Holding, Ltd. (Hong Kong) | 21,627 |
1,590 | Harley-Davidson, Inc. | 83,618 | |
1,294 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 109,278 | |
922 | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. – Class “A” | 47,584 | |
1,710 | Las Vegas Sands Corporation | 98,393 | |
1,650 | Lennar Corporation | 69,861 | |
2,303 | Lowe’s Companies, Inc. | 166,300 | |
1,726 | McDonald’s Corporation | 199,111 | |
2,507 | * | Netflix, Inc. | 247,065 |
6,143 | NIKE, Inc. – Class “B” | 323,429 | |
1,707 | * | Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Ltd. | 64,354 |
124 | * | NVR, Inc. | 203,344 |
696 | * | Panera Bread Company | 135,525 |
154 | * | Priceline Group, Inc. | 226,609 |
540 | Ralph Lauren Corporation | 54,616 | |
3,063 | SES SA (Luxembourg) | 75,131 | |
3,712 | Sky, PLC (United Kingdom) | 43,013 | |
2,661 | TJX Companies, Inc. | 198,990 | |
1,091 | * | Toll Brothers, Inc. | 32,577 |
1,664 | * | TripAdvisor, Inc. | 105,132 |
4,378 | * | Wayfair, Inc. – Class “A” | 172,362 |
3,684,249 | |||
Consumer Staples—9.0% | |||
2,508 | Altria Group, Inc. | 158,581 | |
1,272 | British American Tobacco, PLC (United Kingdom) | 81,281 | |
1,068 | Church & Dwight Company, Inc. | 51,179 | |
461 | Clorox Company | 57,708 | |
9,974 | Coca-Cola Company | 422,100 | |
4,733 | Colgate-Palmolive Company | 350,905 | |
3,887 | Costco Wholesale Corporation | 592,806 |
167 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Consumer Staples (continued) | |||
1,539 | * | Coty, Inc. – Class “A” (a) | $ 35,705 |
1,338 | General Mills, Inc. | 85,471 | |
709 | Hershey Company | 67,780 | |
772 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 97,380 | |
494 | McCormick & Company, Inc. | 49,360 | |
1,736 | * | Monster Beverage Corporation | 254,862 |
6,808 | * | Nomad Foods, Ltd. | 80,471 |
1,695 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 184,365 | |
1,838 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 178,690 | |
2,600 | Procter & Gamble Company | 233,350 | |
1,494 | Sysco Corporation | 73,221 | |
3,055,215 | |||
Energy—4.5% | |||
2,012 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | 127,480 | |
2,291 | Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation | 59,108 | |
1,984 | Canadian Natural Resources, Ltd. | 63,567 | |
2,358 | * | Cobalt International Energy, Inc. | 2,924 |
1,949 | * | Continental Resources, Inc. | 101,270 |
2,936 | * | Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 283,441 |
1,956 | Halliburton Company | 87,785 | |
521 | Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 35,063 | |
531 | Hess Corporation | 28,472 | |
1,408 | HollyFrontier Corporation | 34,496 | |
3,347 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 52,916 | |
458 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 16,827 | |
4,808 | * | Newfield Exploration Company | 208,956 |
1,504 | Pioneer Natural Resources Company | 279,218 | |
1,333 | QEP Resources, Inc. | 26,034 | |
2,576 | * | Southwestern Energy Company | 35,652 |
5,354 | Trican Well Service, Ltd. (Canada) | 10,978 | |
1,693 | World Fuel Services Corporation | 78,318 | |
1,532,505 | |||
Financials—14.8% | |||
173 | * | Alleghany Corporation | 90,828 |
1,097 | Allstate Corporation | 75,890 | |
4,145 | American Express Company | 265,446 | |
1,586 | American International Group, Inc. | 94,113 | |
492 | * | Arch Capital Group, Ltd. | 38,996 |
2,653 | Arthur J. Gallagher & Company | 134,958 | |
605 | Axis Capital Holdings, Ltd. | 32,870 |
168 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
Financials (continued) | |||
2,027 | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. – Class “B” | $ 292,841 | |
505 | BlackRock, Inc. | 183,042 | |
3,278 | Chubb, Inc. | 411,881 | |
670 | Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 50,531 | |
3,367 | Citigroup, Inc. | 159,023 | |
2,291 | Comerica, Inc. | 108,410 | |
176 | Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc. | 12,661 | |
218 | Everest Re Group, Ltd. | 41,413 | |
573 | FactSet Research Systems, Inc. | 92,883 | |
183 | Fairfax Financial Holdings, Ltd. (Canada) | 107,226 | |
117 | First Citizens Bancshares, Inc. | 34,385 | |
911 | First Republic Bank | 70,247 | |
2,327 | * | Gores Holdings, Inc. | 25,132 |
1,302 | IBERIABANK Corporation | 87,390 | |
1,065 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 70,918 | |
2,298 | M & T Bank Corporation | 266,798 | |
332 | * | Markel Corporation | 308,352 |
4,523 | Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 304,172 | |
4,136 | MetLife, Inc. | 183,762 | |
293 | Moody’s Corporation | 31,726 | |
4,098 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 369,189 | |
2,407 | Principal Financial Group | 123,985 | |
1,968 | Progressive Corporation | 61,992 | |
2,086 | Raymond James Financial, Inc. | 121,426 | |
975 | Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. | 105,242 | |
280 | RenaissanceRe Holdings, Ltd. | 33,645 | |
506 | SEI Investments Company | 23,079 | |
367 | Torchmark Corporation | 23,448 | |
740 | Travelers Companies, Inc. | 84,767 | |
3,814 | Unum Group | 134,672 | |
603 | W.R. Berkley Corporation | 34,829 | |
86 | * | White Mountains Insurance Group | 71,380 |
3,934 | XL Group, Ltd. | 132,300 | |
3,697 | Zions Bancorporation | 114,681 | |
5,010,529 | |||
Health Care—14.7% | |||
710 | * | ABIOMED, Inc. | 91,292 |
1,682 | * | Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. | 83,343 |
639 | * | Alder Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. | 20,940 |
1,725 | * | Align Technology, Inc. | 161,719 |
1,020 | * | Alkermes, PLC (Ireland) | 47,971 |
169 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Health Care (continued) | |||
1,495 | * | Allergan, PLC | $ 344,313 |
1,170 | * | athenahealth, Inc. | 147,560 |
163 | * | Biogen, Inc. | 51,024 |
9,347 | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 503,990 | |
2,545 | Cardinal Health, Inc. | 197,747 | |
1,282 | Danaher Corporation | 100,496 | |
686 | * | DaVita, Inc. | 45,324 |
1,682 | Dentsply Sirona, Inc. | 99,961 | |
2,030 | * | DexCom, Inc. | 177,950 |
325 | Eli Lilly & Company | 26,085 | |
2,514 | * | Endo International, PLC | 50,657 |
7,972 | * | Envision Healthcare Holdings, Inc. | 177,536 |
1,310 | Incyte Pharmaceutical, Inc. | 123,520 | |
3,850 | Johnson & Johnson | 454,801 | |
742 | * | Laboratory Corporation of America | 102,010 |
2,809 | McKesson Corporation | 468,401 | |
341 | * | MEDNAX, Inc. | 22,591 |
3,643 | Medtronic, PLC | 314,755 | |
3,970 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 247,768 | |
258 | Mettler-Toledo International | 108,316 | |
6,666 | * | Mylan NV (Netherlands) | 254,108 |
4,706 | * | Novavax, Inc. | 9,788 |
696 | Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 279,806 | |
435 | * | Tesaro, Inc. | 43,604 |
1,295 | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. (Isreal) | 59,583 | |
1,182 | UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 165,480 | |
4,982,439 | |||
Industrials—12.8% | |||
860 | 3M Company | 151,558 | |
1,344 | Alaska Air Group, Inc. | 88,516 | |
3,157 | Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. | 90,543 | |
191 | AMERCO | 61,928 | |
4,417 | Canadian National Railway Company (Canada) | 288,732 | |
697 | Cintas Corporation | 78,482 | |
3,930 | CSX Corporation | 119,865 | |
717 | Eaton Corporation, PLC | 47,114 | |
730 | Equifax, Inc. | 98,243 | |
1,308 | Fastenal Company | 54,648 | |
2,015 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 73,145 |
4,781 | * | Genesee & Wyoming, Inc. | 329,650 |
1,539 | * | Hertz Global Holdings, Inc | 61,806 |
170 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
Industrials (continued) | |||
1,139 | Honeywell International, Inc. | $ 132,796 | |
274 | Hubbell, Inc. | 29,521 | |
1,308 | IDEX Corporation | 122,390 | |
85 | * | FleetCor Technologies, Inc. | 14,767 |
9,849 | * | IHS Markit, Ltd. | 369,830 |
1,096 | J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | 88,929 | |
3,291 | Knight Transportation, Inc. | 94,419 | |
1,076 | Lennox International, Inc. | 168,964 | |
1,159 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 277,836 | |
1,130 | MSC Industrial Direct Company, Inc. – Class “A” | 82,953 | |
1,366 | * | Middleby Corporation | 168,865 |
416 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | 89,003 | |
1,620 | PACCAR, Inc. | 95,224 | |
679 | Raytheon Company | 92,432 | |
1,004 | Republic Services, Inc. | 50,652 | |
687 | Ryder System, Inc. | 45,308 | |
4,143 | Sanwa Holdings Corporation (Japan) | 39,671 | |
457 | UniFirst Corporation | 60,260 | |
2,431 | Union Pacific Corporation | 237,095 | |
4,180 | United Parcel Service, Inc. – Class “B” | 457,125 | |
1,201 | Waste Management, Inc. | 76,576 | |
4,338,846 | |||
Information Technology—14.3% | |||
1,715 | * | Accenture, PLC – Class “A” | 209,522 |
2,233 | Activision Blizzard, Inc. | 98,922 | |
2,088 | * | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | 110,643 |
1,718 | * | Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd. | 181,747 |
151 | * | Alphabet, Inc. – Class “A” | 121,413 |
278 | * | Alphabet, Inc. – Class “C” | 216,087 |
1,514 | Amphenol Corporation | 98,289 | |
875 | Analog Devices, Inc. | 56,394 | |
1,631 | ARRIS International, PLC | 46,206 | |
1,115 | * | Arrow Electronics, Inc. | 71,327 |
2,082 | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 183,632 | |
2,915 | Booz Allen Hamilton Holdings Corporation | 92,143 | |
418 | Broadcom, Ltd. | 72,113 | |
3,967 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 125,833 | |
933 | * | CoStar Group, Inc. | 202,023 |
1,135 | * | Envestnet, Inc. | 41,371 |
1,288 | Facebook, Inc. – Class “A” | 165,212 |
171 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Information Technology (continued) | |||
6,085 | * | Genpact, Ltd. | $ 145,736 |
1,393 | Global Payments, Inc. | 106,927 | |
1,145 | Harris Corporation | 104,893 | |
4,751 | * | Just Eat, PLC (United Kingdom) | 33,007 |
269 | Lam Research Corporation | 25,477 | |
901 | Microchip Technology, Inc. | 55,988 | |
1,806 | * | Microsemi Corporation | 75,816 |
6,295 | Microsoft Corporation | 362,592 | |
3,200 | Mobileye NV (Netherlands) | 136,224 | |
837 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | 63,846 | |
95 | * | Pure Storage, Inc. | 1,287 |
1,996 | * | Qorvo, Inc. | 111,257 |
2,932 | ServiceNow, Inc. | 232,068 | |
2,461 | Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (ADR) | 127,455 | |
1,338 | Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 101,875 | |
5,852 | SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. | 188,142 | |
3,852 | * | Trimble, Inc. | 110,013 |
1,449 | * | VeriSign, Inc. | 113,370 |
1,934 | Visa, Inc. | 159,942 | |
1,109 | Western Digital Corporation | 64,843 | |
3,561 | Workday, Inc. – Class “A” | 326,508 | |
2,946 | * | Zillow Group, Inc. – Class “A” | 101,490 |
4,841,633 | |||
Materials—3.0% | |||
898 | Ball Corporation | 73,591 | |
510 | Bemis Company, Inc. | 26,015 | |
2,859 | Celanese Corporation – Class “A” | 190,295 | |
1,902 | CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 46,314 | |
2,174 | * | Constellium NV- Class “A” | 15,653 |
1,335 | CRH, PLC | 44,332 | |
5,589 | * | Louisiana-Pacific Corporation | 105,241 |
2,816 | Methanex Corporation | 100,475 | |
10,429 | * | Platform Specialty Products Corporation | 84,579 |
1,122 | Praxair, Inc. | 135,571 | |
987 | Reliance Steel & Aluminum Company | 71,094 | |
247 | Sherwin-Williams Company | 68,335 | |
1,021 | Silgan Holdings, Inc. | 51,652 | |
1,013,147 |
172 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
Real Estate—3.4% | |||
1,943 | American Capital Agency Corporation (REIT) | $ 37,966 | |
2,512 | American Tower Corporation (REIT) | 284,685 | |
4,474 | Annaly Mortgage Management (REIT) | 46,977 | |
2,669 | Columbia Property Trust, Inc. (REIT) | 59,759 | |
865 | Crown Castle International Corporation (REIT) | 81,492 | |
297 | Federal Realty Investment Trust (REIT) | 45,717 | |
3,909 | Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (REIT) | 60,863 | |
1,164 | PS Buisness Park, Inc. (REIT) | 132,195 | |
884 | Public Storage (REIT) | 197,256 | |
6,603 | STORE Capital Corporation (REIT) | 194,590 | |
1,141,500 | |||
Telecommunication Services—1.5% | |||
5,543 | AT&T, Inc. | 225,101 | |
5,850 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 304,083 | |
529,184 | |||
Utilities—5.4% | |||
2,408 | Alliant Energy Corporation | 92,250 | |
999 | AMEREN Corporation | 49,131 | |
1,239 | American Electric Power Company, Inc. | 79,556 | |
527 | Atmos Energy Corporation | 39,246 | |
1,152 | CMS Energy Corporation | 48,396 | |
888 | Consolidated Edison, Inc. | 66,866 | |
1,290 | Dominion Resources, Inc. | 95,808 | |
629 | DTE Energy Company | 58,918 | |
1,313 | Duke Energy Corporation | 105,093 | |
959 | Edison International | 69,288 | |
1,073 | Eversource Energy | 58,135 | |
2,635 | Exelon Corporation | 87,719 | |
879 | NextEra Energy, Inc. | 107,519 | |
1,959 | OGE Energy Corporation | 61,944 | |
2,932 | PG&E Corporation | 179,350 | |
548 | Pinnacle West Capital Corporation | 41,643 | |
620 | SCANA Corporation | 44,869 | |
1,129 | Sempra Energy | 121,018 | |
1,916 | Southern Company | 98,291 |
173 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Utilities (continued) | |||||||
4,637 | UGI Corporation | $ 209,778 | |||||
1,026 | WEC Energy Group, Inc. | 61,437 | |||||
1,579 | Xcel Energy, Inc. | 64,960 | |||||
1,841,215 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $31,856,980) | 94.3 | % | 31,970,462 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 5.7 | 1,932,828 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $33,903,290 |
* | Non-income producing |
(a) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis (see |
Note 1G). |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Expiration | Exercise | |||
PUT OPTIONS PURCHASED—2.3% | Date | Price | Contracts | Value |
S&P 500 Index | 12/16/16 | 1,950.00 | 13 | $ 16,900 |
S&P 500 Index | 3/17/17 | 1,950.00 | 16 | 55,760 |
S&P 500 Index | 6/16/17 | 1,950.00 | 16 | 96,401 |
Total Value of Put Options Purchased (cost $237,357) | $169,061 | |||
Expriration | Exercise | |||
PUT OPTIONS WRITTEN—2.3% | Date | Price | Contracts | Value |
S&P 500 Index | 12/16/16 | 1,700.00 | 2 | $ (482) |
S&P 500 Index | 3/17/17 | 1,700.00 | 5 | (6,350) |
S&P 500 Index | 6/16/17 | 1,700.00 | 27 | (68,985) |
Total Value of Put Options Written (premium received $89,006) | $(75,817) |
174 |
Futures contracts outstanding at September 30, 2016:
Value at | |||||||||||||
Number of | Value at | September 30, | Unrealized | ||||||||||
Contracts | Type | Expiration | Trade Date | 2016 | Depreciation | ||||||||
32 | S&P 500 | Dec. 2016 | $ | 3,428,060 | $ | 3,399,417 | $ | (28,643) | |||||
E-mini | |||||||||||||
28 | Russell 2000 | Dec. 2016 | 3,436,360 | 3,377,426 | (58,934) | ||||||||
Mini | |||||||||||||
$ | (87,577) |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets and liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||
Common Stocks* | $ | 31,970,462 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 31,970,462 | ||||
Other Assets | ||||||||||||
Put Options Purchased | $ | 169,061 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 169,061 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||
Put Options Written | $ | (75,817) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (75,817) | ||||
Futures Contracts | (87,577) | — | — | (87,577) | ||||||||
$ | (163,394) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (163,394) |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 175 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors International Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund outperformed its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index, which returned 7.06%. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 8.80% for Class A shares, 7.83% for Class B shares, 9.22% for Advisor Class shares and 9.39% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 5.2 cents per share for Class A shares, 2.5 cents per share for Class B shares, 6.4 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 6.8 cents per share for Institutional Class shares.
Global equity markets were generally positive for the fiscal year, with emerging markets outperforming their developed market counterparts. After posting slightly positive results for the fourth quarter of 2015, emerging market equities rebounded in the first quarter of 2016, driven by stronger commodity prices, a sharp rise in many emerging market currencies, and lower expectations for U.S. rate increases. The rally that began in the first quarter reversed in May as investors digested waning commodities prices and the prospect of a U.S. rate hike. Emerging markets rebounded again in the third quarter as lower-than-expected interest rates in the United States continued to support demand for higher-yielding assets in the emerging world. Improved capital flows helped some emerging market currencies recover lost ground relative to the U.S. dollar and stabilizing commodity prices helped a number of markets.
In the fourth quarter of 2015, the European Central Bank (“ECB”) announced stimulus and cut its deposit rate by 10 basis points to –0.3%, which was on the lower end of expectations and disappointed markets. In the first quarter of 2016, the ECB announced a stimulus package that lowered its main policy rates and expanded its asset purchase program. While the package exceeded investors’ expectations, ECB President Mario Draghi hinted that future hikes were unlikely to be forthcoming, which drove European stocks down. Economic data signaled that the Eurozone economy continued to grow, albeit slowly. In the second quarter, European equity markets gained momentum with a weaker euro, encouraging macroeconomic data and hopes for a new debt deal with Greece. On June 23rd, the UK’s unexpected vote to exit the European Union (Brexit) shocked financial markets, prompting increased volatility with a sell-off in global risk assets, rallies in safe-haven assets and a sharp decline in the British pound against its major trading currencies. However, most global equity market indices recovered some of their losses in the few trading days after Brexit. In the third quarter, European markets were bolstered by a rapid recovery from the Brexit sell-off and a generally optimistic second quarter reporting season.
In many sectors, price-earnings (“P/E”) ratios are now near the high end of their historic ranges and can reverse as interest rates rise. We are cognizant of this risk and
176 |
evaluate the P/E of each of our holdings relative to their own history. Over the course of this year, we have trimmed back some positions that have appreciated and have gotten closer to or reached our price targets. While we scaled back some positions in our portfolios, we increased exposure to others. We further added to our U.S. and Chinese e-commerce exposure. Our Chinese exposure does not reflect a top-down view on China, rather a deepening of our conviction of the long term growth potential of the leading Chinese e-commerce companies. We continue to maintain our meaningful overweight to the Consumer Staples sector.
We caution investors that, given our consistent focus on investing in high quality growth companies for an absolute return, we will often underperform the market during abrupt recoveries. Relative performance could suffer from continued flows into cyclical areas or a further appreciation in oil or commodity prices. As bottom-up investors, the quality of the franchises we own and their ability to deliver is paramount to our investment process. While some businesses we own have come under pressure, we are confident in our portfolio holdings and their ability to deliver high single digit to low double-digit earnings growth over time. And, through our in-depth, fundamental research, we continue to find new opportunities.
The following discussion highlights specific stocks—those that provided the largest contribution to absolute performance and those that were the largest detractors for the fiscal year. As bottom-up stock pickers, we hope that you find this useful and gain a greater understanding of how we invest your capital.
Top Contributors
Investors were drawn to Philip Morris International as the company continues to perform well. Philip Morris International produces and sells cigarettes under brands such as Marlboro and L&M. In our opinion, the company has strong pricing power, leading brands, consistent currency earnings growth, opportunities for cost savings, and a large dividend. The company is also investing behind next generation products such as its heat-not-burn device, iQos.
British American Tobacco (“BAT”), with its stability and consistency of earnings, was also a top contributor. While based in the UK, its earnings come from outside of it. Currency, after years of being a headwind, is turning into a tailwind due to favorable currency translation as BAT reports its earnings in British Pound Sterling (“GBP”). The company also reported solid first quarter 2016 numbers, highlighting its strong business model even in volatile markets. BAT is one of the world’s largest tobacco companies with market leadership in more than 50 of the 180 markets in which it operates. Nearly 60% of the company’s revenue and over 70% of volumes are generated from emerging markets. It has great global brands including Dunhill,
177 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Kent, Lucky Strike, Pall Mall and Rothmans. The company should be able to deliver consistent high single-digit earnings growth in constant currencies as it has strong pricing power, and opportunities to increase margins through cost saves, while paying a very hefty dividend.
Bottom Contributors
Persimmon was a bottom contributor. We continue to like Persimmon, and we think it’s a strong business in a fundamentally strong housebuilding industry in the UK, due to various structural reasons, including limited land, restrictive planning and a consolidated builder industry. But, due to the uncertainty around the effects of Brexit, concerns around continued volume growth and pricing of new home sales in the UK make it difficult to have visibility on Persimmon in the near and medium term. As a result, we sold the stock.
Lloyds Banking Group sold off in the last few days of June, following the Brexit referendum, as the resulting uncertainty raised the chance that the UK will slide into a recession. We continue to like Lloyds’s competitive position in the concentrated UK banking market. As the largest UK retail bank, Lloyds enjoys substantial economies of scale. Its operations are comprised of simple retail and commercial businesses. However, the macroeconomic environment in the UK will be challenging, as both consumer and business confidence will suffer from the uncertainty surrounding the UK’s relationship with the EU.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
*Mr. Benkendorf became the Fund’s portfolio manager on March 7, 2016.
178 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.61% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,033.16 | $ 8.18 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,016.95 | $ 8.12 | |
Class B Shares | 2.46% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,028.78 | $12.48 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,012.70 | $12.38 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.25% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,035.08 | $ 6.36 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.75 | $ 6.31 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 1.12% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,036.52 | $ 5.70 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.40 | $ 5.65 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
179 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Fund (Class A shares), the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) EAFE Index (Gross) and the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) EAFE Index (Net).
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/06 with theoretical investments in the MSCI EAFE Index (Gross) and the MSCI EAFE Index (Net) (the “Indices”). The Indices are free float-adjusted market capitalization indices that measure developed foreign market equity performance, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The Indices consist of 21 developed market country indices. The MSCI EAFE Index (Gross) is calculated on a total-return basis with the maximum possible dividend reinvestment (before taxes). The MSCI EAFE Index (Net) is calculated on a total-return basis with the minimum possible dividend reinvestment (after taxes). The Indices are unmanaged and it is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of
180 |
a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 2.49% and the Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 2.71%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Indices figures are from Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
† The Index return is for ten years. The MSCI EAFE Index (Gross) return and MSCI EAFE Index (Net) return since inception of the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are 3.79% and 3.30%, respectively.
181 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS—97.7% | |||
United Kingdom—19.7% | |||
268,354 | British American Tobacco, PLC | $ 17,147,776 | |
33,437 | DCC, PLC | 3,044,573 | |
170,744 | Diageo, PLC | 4,892,026 | |
849,741 | Domino’s Pizza Group, PLC | 4,113,675 | |
134,494 | Imperial Brands, PLC | 6,926,741 | |
2,011,843 | Lloyds Banking Group, PLC | 1,422,465 | |
146,299 | Reckitt Benckiser Group, PLC | 13,776,211 | |
116,894 | SABMiller, PLC | 6,810,433 | |
58,133,900 | |||
United States—15.2% | |||
49,156 | Accenture, PLC – Class “A” | 6,005,389 | |
12,099 | * | Alphabet, Inc. – Class “C” | 9,404,432 |
73,493 | MasterCard, Inc. | 7,479,383 | |
162,021 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 15,751,682 | |
4,155 | * | Priceline Group, Inc. | 6,114,041 |
44,754,927 | |||
Switzerland—10.0% | |||
883 | Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Spruengli AG | 5,103,495 | |
149,000 | Nestle SA – Registered | 11,740,556 | |
39,723 | Roche Holding AG – Genusscheine | 9,854,084 | |
205,887 | UBS Group AG | 2,803,793 | |
29,501,928 | |||
India—9.5% | |||
711,169 | HDFC Bank, Ltd. | 13,595,847 | |
17,295 | HDFC Bank, Ltd. (ADR) | 1,243,338 | |
501,987 | Housing Development Finance Corporation, Ltd. | 10,506,065 | |
780,263 | ITC, Ltd. | 2,828,422 | |
28,173,672 | |||
France—6.3% | |||
204,775 | Bureau Veritas SA | 4,392,521 | |
31,629 | Essilor International SA | 4,078,915 | |
7,342 | Hermes International | 2,987,721 | |
22,397 | L’Oreal SA | 4,229,362 | |
25,489 | Sodexo SA | 3,035,121 | |
18,723,640 |
182 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
Japan—6.2% | |||
30,910 | Daito Trust Construction Company, Ltd. | $ 4,930,420 | |
127,800 | Japan Tobacco, Inc. | 5,191,146 | |
19,100 | Shimano, Inc. | 2,810,236 | |
202,600 | Unicharm Corporation | 5,211,598 | |
18,143,400 | |||
China—4.2% | |||
58,841 | * | Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd. (ADR) | 6,224,789 |
220,026 | Tencent Holdings, Ltd. | 6,042,176 | |
12,266,965 | |||
Netherlands—4.0% | |||
253,565 | Unilever NV-CVA | 11,699,954 | |
Canada—3.6% | |||
136,006 | Alimentation Couche-Tard, Inc. – Class “B” | 6,591,152 | |
60,256 | Canadian National Railway Company | 3,938,835 | |
10,529,987 | |||
Spain—3.1% | |||
30,760 | Aena SA | 4,536,995 | |
215,674 | Grifols SA | 4,646,904 | |
9,183,899 | |||
Germany—3.1% | |||
100,228 | SAP SE | 9,110,920 | |
Australia—2.9% | |||
59,316 | CSL, Ltd. | 4,857,539 | |
60,403 | Ramsay Health Care, Ltd. | 3,657,678 | |
8,515,217 | |||
Denmark—2.7% | |||
37,576 | Coloplast A/S – Series “B” | 2,914,055 | |
123,377 | Novo Nordisk A/S – Series “B” | 5,126,515 | |
8,040,570 | |||
South Africa—2.5% | |||
43,403 | Naspers, Ltd. | 7,512,602 |
183 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Belgium—2.0% | |||||||
45,289 | Anheuser-Busch InBev NV | $ 5,932,101 | |||||
Ireland—1.4% | |||||||
36,865 | Paddy Power, PLC | 4,170,240 | |||||
Hong Kong—1.3% | |||||||
527,972 | Link REIT (REIT) | 3,879,945 | |||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $215,115,600) | 288,273,867 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM CORPORATE NOTES—1.7% | |||||||
United States | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$3,000M | 0.295%, 10/21/2016 | 2,999,730 | |||||
1,000M | 0.23%, 11/8/2016 | 999,790 | |||||
1,000M | 0.285%, 11/8/2016 | 999,790 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term Corporate Notes (cost $4,998,964) | 4,999,310 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $220,114,564) | 99.4 | % | 293,273,177 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .6 | 1,758,601 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $295,031,778 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
184 |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom | $ | 58,133,900 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 58,133,900 | ||||
United States | 44,754,927 | — | — | 44,754,927 | ||||||||
Switzerland | 29,501,928 | — | — | 29,501,928 | ||||||||
India | 28,173,672 | — | — | 28,173,672 | ||||||||
France | 18,723,640 | — | — | 18,723,640 | ||||||||
Japan | 18,143,400 | — | — | 18,143,400 | ||||||||
China | 12,266,965 | — | — | 12,266,965 | ||||||||
Netherlands | 11,699,954 | — | — | 11,699,954 | ||||||||
Canada | 10,529,987 | — | — | 10,529,987 | ||||||||
Spain | 9,183,899 | — | — | 9,183,899 | ||||||||
Germany | 9,110,920 | — | — | 9,110,920 | ||||||||
Australia | 8,515,217 | — | — | 8,515,217 | ||||||||
Denmark | 8,040,570 | — | — | 8,040,570 | ||||||||
South Africa | 7,512,602 | — | — | 7,512,602 | ||||||||
Belgium | 5,932,101 | — | — | 5,932,101 | ||||||||
Ireland | 4,170,240 | — | — | 4,170,240 | ||||||||
Hong Kong | 3,879,945 | — | — | 3,879,945 |
185 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2016
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | $ | — | $ | 4,999,310 | $ | — | $ | 4,999,310 | ||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 288,273,867 | $ | 4,999,310 | $ | — | $ | 293,273,177 |
During the year ended September 30, 2016, there were no transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments that had a material inpact to the Fund. This does not include transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments due to the Fund utilizing international fair value pricing during the year (see Note 1A). Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
Transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 securities as of September 30, 2016 resulted from securities priced previously with an official close price (Level 1 securities) or securities fair valued by the Valuation Committee (Level 2 securities). Transfers from Level 2 to Level 1 as of September 30, 2016 were $186,167,898. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
186 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Opportunity Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 7.39% for Class A shares, 6.58% for Class B shares, 7.69% for Advisor Class shares and 7.84% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 4.3 cents per share for Class A shares, none for Class B shares, 6.7 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 8.4 cents per share for Institutional Class shares. In addition, the Fund distributed capital gains of $3.18 per share on each class of shares.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell-off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4 %, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international bonds fell into negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
187 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
The Equity Market
Overall, U.S. equities (measured by the S&P 500 TR Index) posted a strong return of 15.43% for the 12 months ending September 30th. However, they experienced turbulent swings during this period. U.S. equity markets started the review period on a strong note, rallying 8.44% in October 2015 as they were recovering from the August and September sell-off. This was later followed by double-digit losses, amid worries about China, global growth and falling oil prices. Most of those fears subsided in mid-February as China’s markets stabilized, oil producers talked about decreasing supply, and Janet Yellen implied there would be fewer rate hikes than expected in 2016. Then, markets strongly rebounded from the February 11th bottom and gained almost 17% by the June 23rd Brexit vote. Markets then lost over 5% in the two days following the Brexit vote, followed by another strong rally which lasted until mid-July. Markets then stayed calm for the rest of the summer before volatility returned in September.
Overall, mid-cap stocks (measured by the S&P Midcap 400 Index) and small caps (Russell 2000 Index) posted similar returns to large caps, returning 15.33% and 15.46% for the period. However, they experienced much wider swings within the period, especially small caps. Large caps led the market during the fourth quarter of 2015, while small caps outperformed during the third quarter of 2016.
Higher-yielding stocks, including Utilities and real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) outperformed for most of the review period, supported by the low yielding environment and lack of other higher-yielding options. However, they became expensive and fell out of favor in August and September as economic data hinted that the Fed might increase rates by the end of the year. Overall, the Dow Jones U.S. Select Dividend Index and Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index returned 22.24% and 17.70%, respectively, for the past 12 months. All of the S&P 500 sectors ended the review period in positive territory, ranging from 7.40% (Financials) to 26.82% (Telecom Services).
International equities were positive as well. Developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada (measured by the MSCI EAFE Index) finished the review period up 7.06%. Emerging markets (measured by the MSCI EM Index) outperformed developed markets with a return of 17.21%. This was a result of negative yields on many developed market bonds which increased demand for emerging market assets with positive yields. Emerging markets also benefited from recovering commodity prices.
The Fund
While absolute performance was positive, the Fund underperformed the S&P 400 Mid-Cap Index. On a relative basis, stock selection in the Industrial sector, as well as our underweight of the Real Estate sector, were the primary reasons for underperformance. In Industrials, ManpowerGroup—one of the three largest temporary staffing firms in the world—fell sharply after the surprising Brexit vote outcome in June. Two-thirds
188 |
of ManpowerGroup’s revenue is derived in Europe. The Brexit vote threatens slower European economic growth, which tends to be a negative for all staffing firms. Separately, for the year, the Fund carried a significant underweight in the Real Estate sector. Beginning in mid-March, REITs outperformed both the S&P 400 Index and broader financials after the Fed lowered the number of expected 2016 rate increases to two from four. Then, after the surprising Brexit vote outcome in June, REITs outperformed again as low rates looked to persist even longer, and investors viewed U.S. real estate as a safe haven.
Among positive contributors to relative performance, the Fund’s stock selection within the Consumer Staples sector helped. Tyson Foods—a producer of chicken, beef and pork products—increased synergies from its Hillshire Brands acquisition. Tyson Foods also benefited from lower feed costs and higher cattle and hog supplies. Additionally, Tupperware Brands—a global direct seller of beauty and personal care products—benefited from strong sales growth in emerging markets, particularly in China, Mexico and Brazil.
The Fund’s absolute performance was mainly attributable to investments in information technology and consumer staples. Among our information technology stocks, Lam Research Corporation—a supplier of capital equipment to the semiconductor industry—benefited from increased industry spending, particularly for 3D NAND, which is the latest generation of high-density storage drives. Among our Consumer Staples stocks, Tyson Foods and Tupperware Brands—discussed above—both delivered strong results on an absolute basis as well.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
189 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.22% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,048.93 | $ 6.25 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.90 | $ 6.16 | |
Class B Shares | 1.97% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,044.71 | $10.07 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.15 | $ 9.92 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.92% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,050.30 | $ 4.72 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.40 | $ 4.65 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.78% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,051.02 | $ 4.00 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.10 | $ 3.94 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
190 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Opportunity Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Opportunity Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/06 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 400 stocks designed to measure performance of the mid-range sector of the U.S. stock market. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
191 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 10.16% and the Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 10.34%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
† The Index return is for ten years. The Index return since inception of the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares is 10.54%.
192 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS—95.1% | |||
Consumer Discretionary—25.1% | |||
450,000 | American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | $ 8,037,000 | |
175,000 | * | Belmond, Ltd. – Class “A” | 2,224,250 |
230,000 | Big Lots, Inc. | 10,982,500 | |
181,500 | BorgWarner, Inc. | 6,385,170 | |
210,000 | Caleres, Inc. | 5,310,900 | |
229,600 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 16,375,072 | |
330,000 | DSW, Inc. – Class “A” | 6,758,400 | |
124,400 | Foot Locker, Inc. | 8,424,368 | |
85,000 | Group 1 Automotive, Inc. | 5,429,800 | |
86,100 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 7,271,145 | |
110,000 | * | Helen of Troy, Ltd. | 9,478,700 |
126,700 | L Brands, Inc. | 8,966,559 | |
108,200 | Lear Corporation | 13,116,004 | |
165,000 | Magna International, Inc. | 7,086,750 | |
285,000 | * | Michaels Companies, Inc. | 6,888,450 |
658,770 | Newell Brands, Inc. | 34,690,828 | |
65,000 | Nordstrom, Inc. | 3,372,200 | |
64,800 | Oxford Industries, Inc. | 4,386,960 | |
205,200 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 9,886,536 | |
25,000 | Ralph Lauren Corporation | 2,528,500 | |
245,100 | Ruth’s Hospitality Group, Inc. | 3,460,812 | |
255,000 | * | Select Comfort Corporation | 5,508,000 |
308,000 | * | ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. | 10,373,440 |
393,400 | Stein Mart, Inc. | 2,498,090 | |
420,000 | * | TRI Pointe Group, Inc. | 5,535,600 |
215,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 14,054,550 | |
40,500 | Whirlpool Corporation | 6,567,480 | |
475,000 | * | William Lyon Homes – Class “A” | 8,811,250 |
130,000 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 8,752,900 | |
243,162,214 | |||
Consumer Staples—5.5% | |||
82,300 | AdvancePierre Foods Holdings, Inc. | 2,268,188 | |
52,800 | B&G Foods, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,596,704 | |
90,000 | * | Herbalife, Ltd. | 5,579,100 |
415,625 | Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV (ADR) | 9,413,906 | |
20,800 | McCormick & Company, Inc. | 2,078,336 | |
89,200 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 5,778,376 | |
250,000 | Pinnacle Foods, Inc. | 12,542,500 |
193 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Consumer Staples (continued) | |||
98,700 | Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | $ 3,635,121 | |
45,000 | Tyson Foods, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,360,150 | |
266,900 | * | U.S. Foods Holding Corporation | 6,301,509 |
53,553,890 | |||
Energy—2.8% | |||
30,100 | * | Dril-Quip, Inc. | 1,677,774 |
80,000 | EOG Resources, Inc. | 7,736,800 | |
90,000 | EQT Corporation | 6,535,800 | |
85,000 | Hess Corporation | 4,557,700 | |
80,000 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 2,939,200 | |
180,000 | PBF Energy, Inc. – Class “A” | 4,075,200 | |
27,522,474 | |||
Financials—13.1% | |||
68,000 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 6,784,360 | |
220,000 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 6,096,200 | |
480,000 | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 11,860,800 | |
230,000 | Discover Financial Services | 13,006,500 | |
400,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 7,720,000 | |
135,000 | First Republic Bank | 10,409,850 | |
91,250 | Great Western Bancorp, Inc. | 3,040,450 | |
120,000 | iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (ETF) | 18,565,200 | |
160,000 | iShares Russell 2000 ETF (ETF) | 19,873,600 | |
120,000 | NASDAQ, Inc. | 8,104,800 | |
220,000 | National General Holdings Corporation | 4,892,800 | |
225,000 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 9,510,750 | |
210,600 | Sterling Bancorp | 3,685,500 | |
170,000 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,087,200 | |
126,638,010 | |||
Health Care—15.6% | |||
50,000 | * | Allergan, PLC | 11,515,500 |
150,000 | * | AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. | 4,780,500 |
80,000 | * | AmSurg Corporation | 5,364,000 |
245,600 | * | Centene Corporation | 16,445,376 |
70,700 | * | Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. | 5,892,138 |
75,000 | Dentsply Sirona, Inc. | 4,457,250 | |
140,000 | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 11,076,800 | |
247,500 | Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. | 15,340,050 |
194 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
Health Care (continued) | |||
80,000 | McKesson Corporation | $ 13,340,000 | |
3,000 | * | Patheon NV | 88,890 |
51,500 | Perrigo Company, PLC | 4,754,995 | |
350,500 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 9,526,590 | |
230,000 | * | Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. | 11,102,100 |
75,000 | Quest Diagnostics, Inc. | 6,347,250 | |
125,000 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 19,882,500 | |
50,000 | * | VCA, Inc. | 3,499,000 |
255,000 | * | VWR Corporation | 7,231,800 |
150,644,739 | |||
Industrials—10.0% | |||
130,000 | A.O. Smith Corporation | 12,842,700 | |
160,300 | ESCO Technologies, Inc. | 7,441,126 | |
65,000 | Ingersoll-Rand, PLC | 4,416,100 | |
224,100 | ITT, Inc. | 8,031,744 | |
82,500 | J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | 6,694,050 | |
247,200 | Korn/Ferry International | 5,191,200 | |
115,000 | ManpowerGroup, Inc. | 8,309,900 | |
85,200 | Nielsen Holdings, PLC | 4,564,164 | |
82,500 | Regal Beloit Corporation | 4,907,925 | |
59,300 | Robert Half International, Inc. | 2,245,098 | |
40,000 | Roper Technologies, Inc. | 7,298,800 | |
95,000 | Snap-On, Inc. | 14,436,200 | |
184,600 | Textron, Inc. | 7,337,850 | |
245,200 | Triton International, Ltd. | 3,234,188 | |
96,951,045 | |||
Information Technology—12.6% | |||
580,000 | * | ARRIS International, PLC | 16,431,400 |
70,000 | Broadcom, Ltd. | 12,076,400 | |
90,000 | * | Fiserv, Inc. | 8,952,300 |
251,500 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | 6,051,090 | |
167,500 | Lam Research Corporation | 15,863,925 | |
79,000 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 2,762,630 | |
50,400 | Sabre Corporation | 1,420,272 | |
165,500 | Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (ADR) | 8,571,245 | |
445,500 | Symantec Corporation | 11,182,050 | |
14,300 | * | Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. | 588,874 |
36,900 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 2,375,622 |
195 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Information Technology (continued) | |||
564,800 | Travelport Worldwide, Ltd. | $ 8,488,944 | |
275,000 | Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 13,139,500 | |
175,000 | Western Digital Corporation | 10,232,250 | |
52,400 | * | Zebra Technologies Corporation – Class “A” | 3,647,564 |
121,784,066 | |||
Materials—2.8% | |||
185,600 | * | Ferro Corporation | 2,563,136 |
40,000 | Praxair, Inc. | 4,833,200 | |
440,000 | * | Summit Materials, Inc. – Class “A” | 8,162,000 |
197,400 | Trinseo SA | 11,164,944 | |
26,723,280 | |||
Real Estate—4.5% | |||
403,500 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 11,213,265 | |
150,000 | Douglas Emmett, Inc. (REIT) | 5,494,500 | |
45,000 | Federal Realty Investment Trust (REIT) | 6,926,850 | |
610,000 | FelCor Lodging Trust, Inc. (REIT) | 3,922,300 | |
55,658 | Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 1,823,913 | |
618,644 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 7,912,457 | |
150,000 | Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. (REIT) | 5,844,000 | |
43,137,285 | |||
Utilities—3.1% | |||
4,100 | Black Hills Corporation | 251,002 | |
69,000 | NiSource, Inc. | 1,663,590 | |
144,800 | Portland General Electric Company | 6,167,032 | |
135,000 | SCANA Corporation | 9,769,950 | |
200,000 | WEC Energy Group, Inc. | 11,976,000 | |
29,827,574 | |||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $667,719,445) | 919,944,577 |
196 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—4.7% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$13,000M | 0.295%, 10/21/2016 | $ 12,998,830 | |||||
6,000M | 0.27%, 10/24/2016 | 5,999,370 | |||||
6,500M | 0.295%, 10/24/2016 | 6,499,317 | |||||
3,000M | 0.285%, 11/8/2016 | 2,999,370 | |||||
6,000M | 0.285%, 11/10/2016 | 5,998,668 | |||||
11,000M | 0.23%, 11/23/2016 | 10,996,733 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $45,489,081) | 45,492,288 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $713,208,526) | 99.8 | % | 965,436,865 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .2 | 1,893,859 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $967,330,724 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
197 |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 919,944,577 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 919,944,577 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 45,492,288 | — | 45,492,288 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 919,944,577 | $ | 45,492,288 | $ | — | $ | 965,436,865 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
198 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
REAL ESTATE FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Real Estate Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 15.19% for Class A shares, 15.66% for Advisor Class shares and 15.89% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 18.3 cents per share for Class A shares, 20.8 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 21.4 cents per share for Institutional Class shares. In addition, the Fund distributed capital gains of 2.2 cents per share on each class of shares.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell-off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4%, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international
199 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
REAL ESTATE FUND
bonds fell into negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
The Equity Market
Overall, U.S. equities (measured by the S&P 500 TR Index) posted a strong return of 15.43% for the 12 months ending September 30th. However, they experienced turbulent swings during this period. U.S. equity markets started the review period on a strong note, rallying 8.44% in October 2015 as they were recovering from the August and September sell-off. This was later followed by double-digit losses, amid worries about China, global growth and falling oil prices. Most of those fears subsided in mid-February as China’s markets stabilized, oil producers talked about decreasing supply, and Janet Yellen implied there would be fewer rate hikes than expected in 2016. Then, markets strongly rebounded from the February 11th bottom and gained almost 17% by the June 23rd Brexit vote. Markets then lost over 5% in the two days following the Brexit vote, followed by another strong rally which lasted until mid-July. Markets then stayed calm for the rest of the summer before volatility returned in September.
Overall, mid-cap stocks (measured by the S&P Midcap 400 Index) and small caps (Russell 2000 Index) posted similar returns to large caps, returning 15.33% and 15.46% for the period. However, they experienced much wider swings within the period, especially small caps. Large caps led the market during the fourth quarter of 2015, while small caps outperformed during the third quarter of 2016.
Higher-yielding stocks, including Utilities and real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), outperformed for most of the review period, supported by the low yielding environment and lack of other higher-yielding options. However, they became expensive and fell out of favor in August and September as economic data hinted that the Fed might increase rates by the end of the year. Overall, the Dow Jones U.S. Select Dividend Index and Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index returned 22.24% and 17.70%, respectively, for the past 12 months. All of the S&P 500 sectors ended the review period in positive territory, ranging from 7.40% (Financials) to 26.82% (Telecom Services).
International equities were positive as well. Developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada (measured by the MSCI EAFE Index) finished the review period up 7.06%. Emerging markets (the MSCI EM Index) outperformed developed markets with a return of 17.21%. This was a result of negative yields on many developed market bonds which increased demand for emerging market assets with positive yields. Emerging markets also benefited from recovering commodity prices.
200 |
The Fund
The past fiscal year proved to be eventful and volatile for U.S. REITs and the equity market in general. The Federal Reserve initiated an interest rate hike in December 2015, the first hike since 2006. This was quickly followed by concerns over an economic slowdown in China, falling commodity prices, and the unexpected Brexit role that is still playing out.
Aided by a growing U.S. economy and strong employment, investors seemed to shrug off these negatives mentioned above. The U.S. broader equity market had double digit positive total return. U.S. REITs, further supported by a compression of government bond yield (10-year Treasury yield declined to 1.59% versus 2.04% one year ago), outperformed the broader U.S. market.
Single Tenant (+58.3%) was the strongest performing sector followed by Industrial (+42.8%). The worst performing sectors were Diversified (+6.1%) and Hotels (+6.8%).
Top relative contributors were Single Tenant and Hotels. Worst relative detractors were Self Storage and Industrial.
Sector allocation and stock selection in the Hotels, Healthcare, Manufactured Homes and Office sectors contributed positively to the Fund’s performance relative to the benchmark Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Total Return Index. Most of the negative effects were from sector allocation in Industrial and Self Storage, and stock selection in the Diversified sector.
In the Office sector, our overweight position in Corporate Office Properties and underweight in SL Green Realty Corporation contributed to relative performance. In our view, office demand is supported by robust employment growth and supply remains muted.
In the Healthcare sector, our overweight position in Ventas helped relative performance as the stock benefited from dividend yield compression. Our overweight position in Care Capital Properties detracted from relative performance, as investors were concerned about portfolio transition and bloated expenses.
Underweight in the Industrial sector hurt relative performance, while stock selection within the sector was neutral. The continued growth of e-commerce drove demand for industrial real estate. We believe the sector’s strong performance has led to overvaluation.
201 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
REAL ESTATE FUND
In Single Tenant, our overweight position in Select Income REIT boosted relative performance. We sold National Retail Properties to recycle capital into better ideas.
New supply in coastal markets has depressed rental rates in the Apartment sector. Apartment REITs generally have reported lackluster earnings and guidance. Demand is still healthy, driven by strong employment. We expect demand and supply to revert back to a healthy balance in the next two years. Overweight in AvalonBay Communities and Equity Residential negatively impacted relative performance.
In Malls, our overweight position in Tanger Factory Outlet, CBL & Associates Properties and WP Glimcher contributed to performance. CBL & Associates Properties was cleared by the SEC over an allegation of accounting irregularities, proving our thesis. We have reduced our position in CBL as the stock rebounded. We continue to find the Malls sector to be attractive due to valuation.
Stock selection and sector allocation in Hotels contributed to relative performance. We took advantage of the sell-off in the first quarter of 2016, as investors were selling due to fear, not fundamentals. The outlook for Hotels should be soft under the prospect of a stronger U.S. dollar.
At the end of the period, the Fund maintained an overweight exposure to Self Storage and Malls and was underweight to Industrial and Shopping Centers.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
202 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
REAL ESTATE FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.45% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,018.36 | $7.32 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,017.75 | $7.31 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.12% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,020.48 | $5.66 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.40 | $5.65 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 1.00% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,021.71 | $5.05 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.00 | $5.05 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
203 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
REAL ESTATE FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Real Estate Fund (Class A shares) and the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Real Estate Fund (Class A shares) beginning 4/6/15 (commencement of operations) with a theoretical investment in the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index (the “Index”). The Index intends to measure the performance of publicly traded REITs and REIT-like securities. The index is a subset of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Real Estate Securities Index (RESI), which represents equity real estate investment trusts (REITs) and real estate operating companies (REOCs) traded in the U.S. The indices are designed to serve as proxies for direct real estate investment, in part by excluding companies whose performance may be driven by factors other than the value of real estate. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance
204
may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 8.43% and (1.91)%, respectively. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 15.57% and 2.76%, respectively. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 15.83% and 2.48%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
†The Since Inception returns for Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the period beginning 4/6/15 (commencement of operations).
205 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
REAL ESTATE FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS—96.4% | |||
Apartments REITs—14.4% | |||
11,737 | Apartment Investment & Management Company – Class “A” | $ 538,846 | |
23,367 | AvalonBay Communities, Inc. | 4,155,587 | |
5,227 | Camden Property Trust | 437,709 | |
51,766 | Equity Residential | 3,330,107 | |
7,911 | Essex Property Trust, Inc. | 1,761,780 | |
10,954 | Mid-America Apartment Communities | 1,029,567 | |
7,432 | Post Properties, Inc. | 491,478 | |
8,351 | UDR, Inc. | 300,553 | |
12,045,627 | |||
Diversified REITs—6.7% | |||
25,762 | Communications Sales & Leasing, Inc. | 809,184 | |
3,048 | CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc. | 89,398 | |
81,445 | Corrections Corporation of America | 1,129,642 | |
1,457 | Digital Realty Trust, Inc. | 141,504 | |
30,516 | Duke Realty Corporation | 834,002 | |
2,487 | DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. | 102,589 | |
2,737 | Liberty Property Trust | 110,438 | |
23,564 | Vornado Realty Trust | 2,384,912 | |
2,840 | Whitestone REIT | 39,419 | |
5,641,088 | |||
Health Care REITs—12.9% | |||
51,816 | Care Capital Properties, Inc. | 1,476,756 | |
82,931 | HCP, Inc. | 3,147,231 | |
1,630 | Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc. | 55,518 | |
3,260 | Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. | 106,341 | |
1,650 | LTC Properties, Inc. | 85,784 | |
6,080 | Omega Heathcare Investors, Inc. | 215,536 | |
19,225 | Senior Housing Properties Trust | 436,600 | |
62,234 | Ventas, Inc. | 4,395,587 | |
11,380 | Welltower, Inc. | 850,883 | |
10,770,236 |
206 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
Hotels REITs—2.8% | |||
16,612 | Hospitality Properties Trust | $ 493,709 | |
78,504 | Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 1,222,307 | |
22,945 | LaSalle Hotel Properties | 547,697 | |
7,948 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. | 101,655 | |
2,365,368 | |||
Manufactured Homes REITs—2.7% | |||
18,364 | Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. | 1,417,334 | |
10,371 | Sun Communities, Inc. | 813,916 | |
2,231,250 | |||
Mortgage REITs—.1% | |||
5,269 | American Capital Agency Corporation | 102,956 | |
Office Property REITs—10.2% | |||
9,051 | Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. | 984,477 | |
19,944 | Boston Properties, Inc. | 2,718,168 | |
5,700 | Brandywine Realty Trust | 89,034 | |
16,890 | City Office REIT, Inc. | 215,010 | |
17,825 | Corporate Office Properties Trust | 505,339 | |
5,120 | Douglas Emmett, Inc. | 187,546 | |
7,040 | Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. – Class “A” | 147,488 | |
20,515 | * | Equity Commonwealth | 619,963 |
424 | Franklin Street Properties Corporation | 5,342 | |
10,665 | Mack-Cali Realty Corporation | 290,301 | |
43,470 | New York REIT, Inc. | 397,751 | |
52,597 | Paramount Group, Inc. | 862,065 | |
12,680 | Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. – Class “A” | 276,044 | |
5,912 | SL Green Realty Corporation | 639,087 | |
36,865 | Tier REIT, Inc. | 569,196 | |
8,506,811 | |||
Real Estate Owners/Development—.6% | |||
12,286 | RMR Group, Inc. – Class “A” | 466,131 | |
Real Estate Services—2.9% | |||
91,416 | * | Marcus & Millichap, Inc. | 2,390,528 |
Regional Malls REITs—20.3% | |||
80,899 | CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. | 982,114 | |
90,103 | General Growth Properties, Inc. | 2,486,843 | |
7,690 | Macerich Company | 621,890 |
207 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
REAL ESTATE FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Regional Malls REITs (continued) | |||
4,945 | Pennsylvania Real Estate Investment Trust | $ 113,883 | |
40,113 | Simon Property Group, Inc. | 8,303,792 | |
54,928 | Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. | 2,139,995 | |
21,441 | Taubman Centers, Inc. | 1,595,425 | |
56,320 | Washington Prime Group, Inc. | 697,242 | |
16,941,184 | |||
Shopping Centers REITs—3.4% | |||
1,282 | Acadia Realty Trust | 46,460 | |
5,800 | Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. | 41,760 | |
24,926 | DDR Corporation | 434,460 | |
4,467 | Federal Realty Investment Trust | 687,605 | |
14,471 | Kimco Realty Corporation | 418,935 | |
7,090 | Kite Realty Group Trust | 196,535 | |
2,580 | Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust | 48,349 | |
5,202 | Regency Centers Corporation | 403,103 | |
23,238 | Retail Properties of America, Inc. – Class “A” | 390,398 | |
4,795 | Weingarten Realty Investors | 186,909 | |
2,854,514 | |||
Single Tenant REITs—2.5% | |||
67,891 | Select Income REIT | 1,826,268 | |
9,060 | Spirit Realty Capital, Inc. | 120,770 | |
1,822 | STORE Capital Corporation | 53,694 | |
8,000 | VEREIT, Inc. | 82,960 | |
2,083,692 | |||
Storage REITs—15.1% | |||
21,866 | CubeSmart | 596,067 | |
41,571 | Extra Space Storage, Inc. | 3,301,153 | |
1,459 | Iron Mountain, Inc. | 54,756 | |
28,854 | Life Storage, Inc. | 2,566,275 | |
27,410 | Public Storage | 6,116,267 | |
12,634,518 | |||
Student Housing REITs—.4% | |||
7,292 | American Campus Communities, Inc. | 370,944 |
208 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Warehouse/Industrial REITs—1.4% | |||||||
1,260 | DCT Industrial Trust, Inc. | $ 61,173 | |||||
684 | EastGroup Properties, Inc. | 50,315 | |||||
3,320 | First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. | 93,690 | |||||
17,840 | Prologis, Inc. | 955,154 | |||||
1,160,332 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $76,685,056) | 96.4 | % | 80,565,179 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 3.6 | 3,026,368 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $83,591,547 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
REITs | Real Estate Investment Trusts |
209 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
REAL ESTATE FUND
September 30, 2016
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks* | $ | 80,565,179 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 80,565,179 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
210 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
SELECT GROWTH FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Select Growth Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 6.50% for Class A shares, 5.71% for Class B shares, 6.93% for Advisor Class shares and 7.00% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 2.1 per share for Class A shares, 0.1 cents per share for Class B shares, 3.3 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 3.4 cents per share for Institutional Class shares. In addition, the Fund distributed capital gains of $1.13 per share on each class of shares.
The fiscal year can be characterized as a parade of distractions. After a solid fiscal first quarter, the market promptly started the second quarter with a significant negative move in January with the Russell 3000 Growth Index dropping 11.0%. It was followed by a rapid recovery which made the second quarter’s return marginally positive. The positive momentum continued into the fiscal third quarter, but a surprise result in a referendum deciding that Great Britain would leave the European Union (Brexit) roiled the market late in June, which again made for a marginally positive quarter. More robust economic data allowed the fiscal fourth quarter to have a good start with a 4.5% up move in the Russell 3000 Growth Index, but signaling of a possible rate hike by the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) gave investors second thoughts. In fact, throughout the year signals from the Fed, as well as other central banks such as the European Central Bank and the Bank of China, whether to raise rates, stay put, or increase stimulus, have been significant contributors to up or down moves in the market. To top it off, it is a presidential election year unlike any we have seen bringing further uncertainty for investors to contemplate. In summation, a series of distractions have kept investors’ focus on factors other than fundamental performance of businesses. As a result, many characteristics for growth the Smith Group favor when selecting stocks, such as positive earnings revisions and positive earnings surprises, have been largely out of favor throughout the year. Thus, while an absolute return of 6.50% for Class A shares is respectable, this result fell short of the benchmark, as many investors put emphasis elsewhere.
The Fund’s performance for the 2016 fiscal year was helped by the Energy and Healthcare sectors. In Energy, a rebound in oil prices propelled the Fund’s holdings in the sector to a 31.0% return, far outpacing the benchmark’s return of 2.5%. Helmerich & Payne, a driller with significant market share in fracking, and Chevron, an integrated oil and gas company, gaining 49.5% and 36.5%, respectively, were the largest contributors to performance. The Healthcare sector saw significant gains in Johnson & Johnson, the medical technology and consumer healthcare company, and C.R. Bard, a surgical technologies company, with the stocks surging 30.2% and 21.4%, respectively. In addition, Allergan, a pharmaceutical company held in the
211 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
Fund since July 2010, gained 6.0% this period before it was sold in January, which provided significant relative performance as the stock’s benchmark return was a 15.3% decline for the year.
On the negative side, the Fund’s holdings in the Information Technology and Industrials sectors disappointed. Information Technology was the most significant positive sector in the benchmark with holdings posting a positive return of 19.5%. With the Fund getting hurt by its position in chip maker Jabil Circuit, down 23.1%, and missing out on big moves in Facebook, Microsoft, and Alphabet (Google), which gained 42.7%, 33.7%, and 26.0%, respectively, the Fund’s return of 8.6% in the sector lagged significantly. In Industrials, long-term holding Alaska Air Group was hurt by additional competition and higher oil prices. The stock declined 27.6% before it was sold in June, but for the total holding period since purchase in July of 2012 the return was more than 230% compared to the benchmark’s 67%. The Fund’s Industrials holdings returned 2.6% in total for the year, lagging the benchmark’s 13.2% return in the sector.
While we are pleased with the absolute performance of the Fund for the 2016 fiscal year, we are disappointed with the relative return compared to the benchmark. However, as the year was coming to a close, the market seemed to respond more favorably to positive economic data indicating that business fundamentals can influence stock performance once again. We continue to believe that equities should be able to generate healthy returns going forward as slow and steady economic growth should provide a solid foundation for strong earnings growth by the companies held by the Fund. We continue to believe our focus on high quality companies where earnings will exceed market expectations is the key to generating excess returns over the long term.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
212 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.26% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,045.58 | $ 6.44 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.70 | $ 6.36 | |
Class B Shares | 2.06% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,041.45 | $10.51 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.70 | $10.38 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.85% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,047.93 | $ 4.35 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.75 | $ 4.29 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.82% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,047.71 | $ 4.20 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.90 | $ 4.14 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
213 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Select Growth Fund (Class A shares) and the Russell 3000 Growth Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Select Growth Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/06 with a theoretical investment in the Russell 3000 Growth Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values (the Russell 3000 Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization). It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that
214 |
shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Advisor Class and Institutional Class were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Advisor Class the “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 11.82%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 11.98%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Frank Russell and Company and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
† The Index return is for ten years. The Index return since inception of the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares is 12.97%.
215 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS—98.3% | |||
Consumer Discretionary—12.0% | |||
252,300 | Coach, Inc. | $ 9,224,088 | |
612,100 | Gentex Corporation | 10,748,476 | |
113,000 | Home Depot, Inc. | 14,540,840 | |
211,900 | Nordstrom, Inc. | 10,993,372 | |
122,500 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 8,247,925 | |
53,754,701 | |||
Consumer Staples—10.9% | |||
196,500 | Campbell Soup Company | 10,748,550 | |
115,500 | Clorox Company | 14,458,290 | |
264,000 | Sysco Corporation | 12,938,640 | |
147,600 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 10,644,912 | |
48,790,392 | |||
Energy—4.8% | |||
44,200 | Chevron Corporation | 4,549,064 | |
47,800 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 4,171,984 | |
72,700 | Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 4,892,710 | |
196,800 | SM Energy Company | 7,592,544 | |
21,206,302 | |||
Financials—10.4% | |||
243,900 | Bank of New York Mellon Corporation | 9,726,732 | |
128,800 | Discover Financial Services | 7,283,640 | |
455,915 | First Horizon National Corporation | 6,943,586 | |
244,100 | SunTrust Banks, Inc. | 10,691,580 | |
55,400 | Travelers Companies, Inc. | 6,346,070 | |
187,900 | Voya Financial, Inc. | 5,415,278 | |
46,406,886 | |||
Health Care—18.6% | |||
64,400 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | 14,443,632 | |
186,400 | * | Centene Corporation | 12,481,344 |
330,300 | * | Hologic, Inc. | 12,825,549 |
57,500 | Johnson & Johnson | 6,792,475 | |
70,500 | McKesson Corporation | 11,755,875 | |
173,300 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 10,815,653 | |
170,500 | * | Quintiles Transnational Holdings, Inc. | 13,820,730 |
82,935,258 |
216 |
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Industrials—10.6% | |||||||
125,600 | Cintas Corporation | $ 14,142,560 | |||||
78,500 | General Dynamics Corporation | 12,180,060 | |||||
93,200 | Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 11,699,396 | |||||
364,800 | * | USG Corporation | 9,430,080 | ||||
47,452,096 | |||||||
Information Technology—31.0% | |||||||
148,000 | * | Adobe Systems, Inc. | 16,063,920 | ||||
13,600 | * | Alphabet, Inc. – Class “A” | 10,935,216 | ||||
164,300 | * | Arista Networks, Inc. | 13,978,644 | ||||
568,600 | * | Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 14,516,358 | ||||
455,100 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 14,435,772 | |||||
152,300 | * | Citrix Systems, Inc. | 12,979,006 | ||||
120,000 | * | Facebook, Inc. – Class “A” | 15,392,400 | ||||
65,200 | * | FleetCor Technologies, Inc. | 11,327,196 | ||||
170,200 | * | Red Hat, Inc. | 13,757,266 | ||||
349,000 | * | Take-Two Interactive Software | 15,732,920 | ||||
139,118,698 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $379,569,607) | 439,664,333 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.7% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$5,500M | 0.28%, 10/13/2016 | 5,499,725 | |||||
2,000M | 0.295%, 10/21/2016 | 1,999,820 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $7,499,159) | 7,499,545 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $387,068,766) | 100.0 | % | 447,163,878 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .0 | 12,023 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $447,175,901 |
* | Non-income producing |
217 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
September 30, 2016
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 439,664,333 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 439,664,333 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 7,499,545 | — | 7,499,545 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 439,664,333 | $ | 7,499,545 | $ | — | $ | 447,163,878 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
218 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Special Situations Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 10.35% for Class A shares, 9.43% for Class B shares, 10.67% for Advisor Class shares and 10.84% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 1.9 cents per share for Class A shares, none for Class B shares, 3.6 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 4.7 for Institutional Class shares. In addition, the Fund distributed capital gains of $1.44 per share on each class of shares.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell-off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4%, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move
219 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international bonds fell into negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
The Equity Market
Overall, U.S. equities (measured by the S&P 500 TR Index) posted a strong return of 15.43% for the 12 months ending September 30th. However, they experienced turbulent swings during this period. U.S. equity markets started the review period on a strong note, rallying 8.44% in October 2015 as they were recovering from the August and September sell-off. This was later followed by double-digit losses, amid worries about China, global growth and falling oil prices. Most of those fears subsided in mid-February as China’s markets stabilized, oil producers talked about decreasing supply, and Janet Yellen implied there would be fewer rate hikes than expected in 2016. Then, markets strongly rebounded from the February 11th bottom and gained almost 17% by the June 23rd Brexit vote. Markets then lost over 5% in the two days following the Brexit vote, followed by another strong rally which lasted until mid-July. Markets then stayed calm for the rest of the summer before volatility returned in September.
Overall, mid-cap stocks (measured by the S&P Midcap 400 Index) and small caps (measured by the Russell 2000 Index) posted similar returns to large caps, returning 15.33% and 15.46% for the period. However, they experienced much wider swings within the period, especially small caps. Large caps led the market during the fourth quarter of 2015, while small caps outperformed during the third quarter of 2016.
Higher-yielding stocks, including Utilities and real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), outperformed for most of the review period, supported by the low yielding environment and lack of other higher-yielding options. However, they became expensive and fell out of favor in August and September as economic data hinted that the Fed might increase rates by the end of the year. Overall, the Dow Jones U.S. Select Dividend Index and Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index returned 22.24% and 17.70%, respectively, for the past 12 months. All of the S&P 500 sectors ended the review period in positive territory, ranging from 7.40% (Financials) to 26.82% (Telecom Services).
International equities were positive as well. Developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada (measured by the MSCI EAFE Index) finished the review period up 7.06%. Emerging markets (measured by the MSCI EM Index) outperformed developed markets with a return of 17.21%. This was a result of negative yields on many developed market bonds which increased demand for emerging market assets with positive yields. Emerging markets also benefited from recovering commodity prices.
220 |
The Fund
The Fund’s absolute performance was mainly attributable to investments in the Information Technology and Healthcare sectors. In Information Technology, Orbotech Ltd.—a provider of capital equipment to the printed circuit board (PCB) and flat panel display industries—benefited from strong order trends, new product ramp ups, and ongoing cost synergies (associated with its acquisition of SPTS Technologies Group Ltd.). Additionally, Newport Corporation—a supplier of photonics instruments, lasers and optical components—agreed to be acquired by MKI Instruments for a significant premium. In healthcare, Surgical Care Affiliates—an operator of ambulatory surgical centers across the U.S.—benefited from accelerating patient volumes and better pricing.
On a relative basis, the Fund underperformed the Russell 2000 Index primarily due to stock selection in Information Technology and Industrials. Despite having a strong year in Information Technology, our position in OSI Systems hurt us on a relative basis. OSI Systems—a maker of electronic systems for security, healthcare, and aerospace markets—suffered from end-market delays in security system installations and airport construction. In industrials, Kforce, Inc.—a provider of professional and technical staffing services in the United States—was impacted by an increase in M&A activity among its clients, causing push-outs in staffing needs.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
221 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.32% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,094.30 | $ 6.91 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.40 | $ 6.66 | |
Class B Shares | 2.12% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,089.84 | $11.08 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.40 | $10.68 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.01% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,096.31 | $ 5.29 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.95 | $ 5.10 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.89% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,097.15 | $ 4.67 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.55 | $ 4.50 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
222 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Special Situations Fund (Class A shares) and the Russell 2000 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Special Situations Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/06 with a theoretical investment in the Russell 2000 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged Index that measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Index consists of the smallest 2,000 companies in the Russell 3000 Index (which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market). It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
223 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 4.00%, 11.11% and 6.71%, respectively. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 5.42%, 11.31% and 6.91%, respectively. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 10.66% and 9.04% respectively. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been 10.83% and 9.26% respectively. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Frank Russell and Company and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
† The Index return is for ten years. The Index return since inception of the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares is 9.64%.
224 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS—97.3% | |||
Consumer Discretionary—17.9% | |||
268,500 | * | 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. – Class “A” | $ 2,462,145 |
229,500 | American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | 4,098,870 | |
192,500 | * | Belmond, Ltd. – Class “A” | 2,446,675 |
131,000 | Caleres, Inc. | 3,312,990 | |
271,000 | * | Century Communities, Inc. | 5,829,210 |
273,500 | Entravision Communications Corporation – Class “A” | 2,086,805 | |
332,500 | * | Fox Factory Holding Corporation | 7,637,525 |
42,500 | Group 1 Automotive, Inc. | 2,714,900 | |
42,500 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 3,589,125 | |
167,000 | * | Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. | 4,589,160 |
102,500 | * | Michaels Companies, Inc. | 2,477,425 |
97,500 | * | Motorcar Parts of America, Inc. | 2,806,050 |
141,000 | * | Nautilus, Inc. | 3,203,520 |
161,500 | Newell Brands, Inc. | 8,504,590 | |
75,500 | Oxford Industries, Inc. | 5,111,350 | |
119,500 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 5,757,510 | |
208,000 | Regal Entertainment Group – Class “A” | 4,524,000 | |
246,500 | Ruth’s Hospitality Group, Inc. | 3,480,580 | |
190,000 | * | ServiceMaster Global Holdings, Inc. | 6,399,200 |
331,000 | * | TRI Pointe Group, Inc. | 4,362,580 |
63,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 4,118,310 | |
58,000 | Visteon Corporation | 4,156,280 | |
187,500 | * | William Lyon Homes – Class “A” | 3,478,125 |
97,146,925 | |||
Consumer Staples—2.5% | |||
16,500 | AdvancePierre Foods Holdings, Inc. | 454,740 | |
119,500 | Pinnacle Foods, Inc. | 5,995,315 | |
88,500 | Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 3,259,455 | |
151,000 | * | U.S. Foods Holding Corporation | 3,565,110 |
13,274,620 | |||
Energy—1.5% | |||
42,500 | Delek US Holdings, Inc. | 734,825 | |
50,000 | * | Dril-Quip, Inc. | 2,787,000 |
91,000 | PBF Energy, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,060,240 | |
99,000 | Western Refining, Inc. | 2,619,540 | |
8,201,605 |
225 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Financials—18.5% | |||
136,000 | AllianceBernstein Holding, LP (MLP) | $ 3,100,800 | |
145,000 | American Financial Group, Inc. | 10,875,000 | |
96,500 | Aspen Insurance Holdings, Ltd. | 4,495,935 | |
161,500 | * | Atlas Financial Holdings, Inc. | 2,546,855 |
206,500 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 5,722,115 | |
117,000 | Brown & Brown, Inc. | 4,412,070 | |
33,200 | * | Capstar Financial Holdings, Inc. | 562,740 |
150,000 | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 3,706,500 | |
34,500 | Endurance Specialty Holdings, Ltd. | 2,258,025 | |
3,600 | * | FB Financial Corporation | 72,648 |
96,500 | * | FCB Financial Holdings, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,708,495 |
417,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 8,048,100 | |
110,500 | Great Western Bancorp, Inc. | 3,681,860 | |
161,500 | * | Green Bancorp, Inc. | 1,765,195 |
68,000 | iShares Russell 2000 ETF (ETF) | 8,446,280 | |
190,000 | OceanFirst Financial Corporation | 3,659,400 | |
75,500 | Opus Bank | 2,670,435 | |
75,500 | Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. | 4,144,195 | |
79,500 | Simmons First National Corporation – Class “A” | 3,967,050 | |
247,500 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 10,461,825 | |
448,000 | Sterling Bancorp | 7,840,000 | |
237,500 | TCF Financial Corporation | 3,446,125 | |
50,000 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 908,000 | |
100,499,648 | |||
Health Care—12.5% | |||
63,000 | * | ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 4,180,050 |
150,000 | * | Centene Corporation | 10,044,000 |
40,000 | * | Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. | 3,333,600 |
147,500 | * | DepoMed, Inc. (a) | 3,683,075 |
102,500 | * | Globus Medical, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,313,425 |
141,000 | Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. | 8,739,180 | |
38,500 | * | ICON, PLC | 2,978,745 |
60,500 | * | Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation | 4,994,275 |
25,500 | * | LivaNova, PLC | 1,532,805 |
1,500 | * | Patheon NV | 44,445 |
113,000 | PerkinElmer, Inc. | 6,340,430 | |
173,500 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 4,715,730 |
226 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
Health Care (continued) | |||
145,000 | * | Surgical Care Affilates, Inc. | $ 7,070,200 |
42,500 | * | VCA, Inc. | 2,974,150 |
161,500 | * | VWR Corporation | 4,580,140 |
67,524,250 | |||
Industrials—12.2% | |||
87,500 | A.O. Smith Corporation | 8,644,125 | |
131,000 | ESCO Technologies, Inc. | 6,081,020 | |
68,000 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 2,468,400 |
169,500 | ITT, Inc. | 6,074,880 | |
253,000 | Kforce, Inc. | 5,183,970 | |
362,000 | * | NCI Building Systems, Inc. | 5,281,580 |
113,000 | Orbital ATK, Inc. | 8,613,990 | |
72,000 | * | Patrick Industries, Inc. | 4,458,240 |
77,000 | Regal Beloit Corporation | 4,580,730 | |
58,000 | Snap-On, Inc. | 8,813,680 | |
43,500 | Standex International Corporation | 4,039,845 | |
152,500 | Triton International, Ltd. | 2,011,475 | |
66,251,935 | |||
Information Technology—14.7% | |||
314,500 | * | ARRIS International, PLC | 8,909,785 |
156,200 | * | Autobytel, Inc. | 2,780,360 |
24,500 | CDW Corporation | 1,120,385 | |
156,500 | * | CommScope Holding Company, Inc. | 4,712,215 |
20,500 | Hackett Group, Inc. | 338,660 | |
43,500 | IAC/InterActiveCorp | 2,717,445 | |
46,000 | Lam Research Corporation | 4,356,660 | |
98,500 | * | Lumentum Holdings, Inc. | 4,114,345 |
167,000 | * | Microsemi Corporation | 7,010,660 |
93,500 | MKS Instruments, Inc. | 4,649,755 | |
87,500 | * | NetScout Systems, Inc. | 2,559,375 |
269,500 | * | Orbotech, Ltd. | 7,979,895 |
186,000 | * | Perficient, Inc. | 3,747,900 |
141,000 | Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (ADR) | 7,302,390 | |
149,000 | * | Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. | 6,135,820 |
230,200 | Travelport Worldwide, Ltd. | 3,459,906 | |
89,500 | Western Digital Corporation | 5,233,065 | |
36,300 | * | Zebra Technologies Corporation – Class “A” | 2,526,843 |
79,655,464 |
227 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Materials—7.0% | |||||||
108,000 | AptarGroup, Inc. | $ 8,360,280 | |||||
382,500 | * | Ferro Corporation | 5,282,325 | ||||
169,500 | Olin Corporation | 3,478,140 | |||||
56,500 | Sensient Technologies Corporation | 4,282,700 | |||||
214,300 | * | Summit Materials, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,975,265 | ||||
165,500 | Trinseo SA | 9,360,680 | |||||
65,500 | WestRock Company | 3,175,440 | |||||
37,914,830 | |||||||
Real Estate—7.3% | |||||||
218,000 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 6,058,220 | |||||
176,000 | Douglas Emmett, Inc. (REIT) | 6,446,880 | |||||
50,000 | Federal Realty Investment Trust (REIT) | 7,696,500 | |||||
398,500 | FelCor Lodging Trust, Inc. (REIT) | 2,562,355 | |||||
58,023 | Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 1,901,414 | |||||
356,500 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 4,559,635 | |||||
183,500 | Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. (REIT) | 7,149,160 | |||||
130,500 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 2,899,710 | |||||
39,273,874 | |||||||
Utilities—3.2% | |||||||
45,000 | Pinnacle West Capital Corporation | 3,419,550 | |||||
105,500 | Portland General Electric Company | 4,493,245 | |||||
68,000 | SCANA Corporation | 4,921,160 | |||||
77,000 | WEC Energy Group, Inc. | 4,610,760 | |||||
17,444,715 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $432,675,826) | 527,187,866 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—2.6% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$5,000M | 0.295%, 10/21/2016 | 4,999,550 | |||||
2,000M | 0.285%, 11/8/2016 | 1,999,580 | |||||
7,160M | 0.26%, 11/23/2016 | 7,157,873 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $14,155,838) | 14,157,003 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $446,831,664) | 99.9 | % | 541,344,869 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .1 | 748,766 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $542,093,635 |
228 |
* | Non-income producing |
(a) | Security valued at fair value (see Note 1A) |
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
MLP | Master Limited Partnership | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 523,504,791 | $ | 3,683,075 | $ | — | $ | 527,187,866 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 14,157,003 | — | 14,157,003 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 523,504,791 | $ | 17,840,078 | $ | — | $ | 541,344,869 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 229 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
TOTAL RETURN FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Total Return Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 8.36% for Class A shares, 7.61% for Class B shares, 8.55% for Advisor Class shares and 8.88% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 27.1 cents per share for Class A shares, 13.1 cents per share for Class B shares, 31.9 cents per share for Advisor Class shares and 32.0 cents per share for Institutional Class shares. In addition, the Fund distributed capital gains of 43.0 cents per share on each class of shares. The Fund’s performance this year was driven in substantial part by its policy of allocating its assets among equities, fixed income investments and cash. The Fund typically has a target asset allocation of 60% equities, 35% bonds, and 5% cash.
Economic Overview
Equity and fixed income markets around the world generated strong returns during the 12 months ending September 30th. However, the trajectory of these returns was bumpy, as investor sentiment changed several times during the year. The largest influence on market sentiment during the review period was the market’s expectations of major central bank actions and divergence in their policies. This period also included the unexpected June 23rd Brexit vote for Britain to leave the European Union, which triggered a short-term $3.6 trillion sell off in global equities. Other dominant factors that affected market returns during the beginning of 2016 included weakness in the Chinese economy and a falling Chinese stock market. Fluctuations in oil and commodity prices were also present for most of the period.
During December 2015, the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) and the European Central Bank (“ECB”) policies moved in opposite directions. The Fed had completed its easing cycle and moved to tightening its policy by December 2015; meanwhile, major international central banks continued easing their monetary policies. In December 2015, the Fed finally implemented its long awaited interest rate increase of 25 basis points, which was its first rate hike in nine years. This drove the yield on the two-year Treasury note to the highest level in years. At that time, the Fed estimated an additional four increases for the 2016 calendar year. However, the Fed became gradually more pessimistic and concerned about the global economy and has left interest rates unchanged year-to-date. More recently, the Fed and the markets became more confident about a potential increase in rates in December 2016. In December 2015, the ECB cut its deposit rate by an additional 0.1%, resulting in a negative 0.3% rate. In March, it made another 0.1% rate cut which brought the deposit rate to negative 0.4 %, and accelerated the rate of its bond purchases from €60 to €80 billion euros per month. The ECB also expanded its purchases to include corporate bonds.
230 |
The other major central bank, the Bank of Japan, implemented negative interest rate policy in January, joining the ECB and other European central banks. This move contributed to the decline in interest rates globally. Yields for many international bonds fell into negative territory, which resulted in higher demand from overseas investors for positive yielding U.S. fixed income.
The Equity Market
Overall, U.S. equities (measured by the S&P 500 TR Index) posted a strong return of 15.43% for the 12 months ending September 30th. However, they experienced turbulent swings during this period. U.S. equity markets started the review period on a strong note, rallying 8.44% in October 2015 as they were recovering from the August and September sell-off. This was later followed by double-digit losses, amid worries about China, global growth and falling oil prices. Most of those fears subsided in mid-February as China’s markets stabilized, oil producers talked about decreasing supply, and Janet Yellen implied there would be fewer rate hikes than expected in 2016. Then, markets strongly rebounded from the February 11th bottom and gained almost 17% by the June 23rd Brexit vote. Markets then lost over 5% in the two days following the Brexit vote, followed by another strong rally which lasted until mid-July. Markets then stayed calm for the rest of the summer before volatility returned in September.
Overall, mid-cap stocks (measured by the S&P Midcap 400 Index) and small-cap stocks (measured by the Russell 2000 Index) posted similar returns to large caps, returning 15.33% and 15.46% for the period. However, they experienced much wider swings within the period, especially small caps. Large caps led the market during the fourth quarter of 2015, while small caps outperformed during the third quarter of 2016.
Higher-yielding stocks, including Utilities and real estate investment trusts (“REITs”), outperformed for most of the review period, supported by the low yielding environment and lack of other higher-yielding options. However, they became expensive and fell out of favor in August and September as economic data hinted that the Fed might increase rates by the end of the year. Overall, the Dow Jones U.S. Select Dividend Index and Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index returned 22.24% and 17.70%, respectively, for the past 12 months. All of the S&P 500 sectors ended the review period in positive territory, ranging from 7.40% (Financials) to 26.82% (Telecom Services).
International equities were positive as well. Developed markets outside the U.S. and Canada (measured by the MSCI EAFE Index) finished the review period up 7.06%. Emerging markets (measured by the MSCI EM Index) outperformed developed markets with a return of 17.21%. This was a result of negative yields on many
231 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
developed market bonds which increased demand for emerging market assets with positive yields. Emerging markets also benefited from recovering commodity prices.
The Bond Market
All major fixed income markets were positive for the past 12 months ending September 30th. The U.S. bond market (measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index) gained 5.26%.
Treasuries (measured by the BofA ML US Treasury Index) returned 4.33% during the review period. They did especially well during the first half of 2016 when they were boosted by declining interest rates and aggressive ECB easing. Longer-dated bonds significantly outperformed with 15+ year Treasuries gaining as much as 13.34% during the review period.
The Treasury yield curve flattened with short-term yields rising and long-term yields declining. The 2-year Treasury yield, which is very sensitive to changes in Fed policy, rose 13 basis points from 0.63% as of 9/30/2015 to 0.76% as of 9/30/2016. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield fell 44 basis points from 2.04% to 1.60%. The route of Treasury yields was very much influenced by the market’s expectations of actions by and comments from central banks. Treasury yields reached their highest level of the review period during the end of 2015, when the market was pricing in the possibility that the Fed might raise interest rates four times in 2016. On the other hand, yields bottomed early in July on speculations that soft global growth would encourage major central banks to support economies with stimulus efforts, including continued low interest rates. The 2-year yield fell to 0.55% while the 10-year yield fell to a new all-time record low of 1.36%. There is an inverse relationship between bond prices and yield changes.
Municipal bonds (measured by the BofA ML Municipal Master Index) returned 5.58%, with the majority of this return happening during the first nine months of the review period. Despite elevated issuance, strong demand from investors looking for yield was a major factor in municipal bond market performance.
Investment grade corporate bonds (measured by the BofA ML Corporate Master Index) posted a strong return of 8.50% for the review period, with the majority of this return occurring between January and August. Low global interest rates and uncertainty caused by the Brexit vote helped this sector perform well as many fixed income investors looked to U.S. markets as a safe haven. In addition, investment grade corporate bonds benefited from the ECB’s corporate bond-buying program, as demand increased for this asset class.
232 |
The high yield bond market (measured by the BofA ML HY Cash Pay Constrained Index) showed strong overall performance of 12.80%. Demand for high yield bonds benefited from investors searching for income. This sector also benefited from a rebound in oil prices. The lowest rated high yield bonds (CCC-rated) were the best performers, gaining 18.05%. However, they also experienced the widest swings; they struggled much more during risk-off periods, while significantly outperforming during risk-on periods.
International fixed income posted strong overall returns, supported by falling yields. Non-U.S. sovereign bonds (measured by the Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index) were up 12.61%. Emerging markets (measured by the BofA ML Global Emerging Markets Sovereign Index) outperformed with a return of 17.50%. At the end of the review period there was about $9.3 trillion negative-yielding government debt instruments in the world, all of them outside the United States. This represents 37% of the Bloomberg Global Developed Sovereign Bond Index and 51% of the all non-U.S. sovereign bonds in the Index.
The Fund
During the period under review, the Fund’s results were driven by a generally favorable market backdrop characterized by periods of extreme low volatility, interrupted by several short-lived market drops and bouts of high volatility, like the UK Brexit vote in June and the Chinese market sell off in January of 2016. While macro trends showed gradual, but uneven, improving economic conditions over the course of the year, potential interest rate actions from the Fed hung over the markets, keeping stock markets fixated. This also had the effect of perpetuating the “yield” trade, where fixed income and equity investors sought out income producing investments, driving up the prices of that market subsector. The rally also took on the “risk on” flavor, as investors enjoyed continued low borrowing costs to indulge in higher risk (beta), lower-quality investments, narrowing the field for long-term market participants.
While absolute performance was positive, relative performance of the Fund lagged versus the market benchmark. Stock selection was solid, but sector allocations proved more problematic. Among sectors, Technology represented the bright spot for the Fund contributing most to absolute return. Investments in the Healthcare and Consumer Staples sectors also contributed. Among the laggards, shares of Industrials, Utilities, Financials and Materials sectors hurt performance on a relative basis, as the Fund was underweighted versus the index. Among market capitalization segments, the Fund’s large-cap stocks performed in line with the markets, while the small-cap and mid-cap segments lagged. The Fund allocated 72.8% of its holdings to large-cap stocks, 12.7% to mid-cap stocks and 14.5% to small-cap stocks (ranges defined by Lipper) as of September 30, 2016.
233 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
Among individual performers, shares of Technology stocks shone brightest. Semiconductor makers Broadcom (+38%), Intel (+25%), and Qualcomm (+27%) rallied strongly reflecting solid smartphone adoption as well as a rebound in enterprise computer spending. Likewise, telecom and networking equipment maker Cisco Systems rose 21%. Packaged software firms Microsoft and Symantec rallied similarly. Merger and acquisition activity also continued to benefit Fund share holdings, as shares of EMC Corporation and Sandisk finalized deals during the fiscal year.
Among healthcare names, strong pharmaceutical results buoyed Johnson & Johnson, which returned +27% for the year. Other large-cap pharmaceutical firms were also strong: Merck and animal drug maker, Zoetis returned +26% each. Medical product suppliers, Thermo Fisher Scientific returned +30%, while Medtronic was +29% amidst healthy surgical volumes and progress with the integration of its Covidien subsidiary. Shares of Baxalta (former biopharmaceutical spin-off of Baxter) returned +46% during the year, as it was acquired by Shire PLC from Ireland in June.
Among Consumer Staples names, shares of tobacco makers Philip Morris International (+23%) and Altria Group (+16%) were the top contributors. Despite consistent results, these shares benefited from the influx of yield-oriented investors seeking dividend plays. Both shares sport dividend yields near 4%. Tyson Foods—the global protein (pork, chicken, beef) leader—rose 73% on increased demand, good pricing and continued benefits from its purchase of the Hillshire Farms packaged food business.
Among laggards, the Industrials sector was a disappointment, as the Fund was underweight versus peers. Additionally, shares of ManpowerGroup—one of the largest global staffing firms—fell 12% after the surprising Brexit vote outcome in June. Two-thirds of the company’s revenue is derived in Europe. The Brexit vote threatens slower European economic growth, which tends to be a negative for all staffing firms. Financials was also a source of underperformance. We have maintained an underweight versus the benchmark over the past several years, as increased regulatory scrutiny has limited profit upside. The underweighting versus the benchmark hurt the Fund again this year.
Finally, the persistence of continued low interest rates (particularly following the UK Brexit vote) continued to benefit the relative performance strength of higher dividend-paying stocks, perceived as stable. The Fund’s underweighting of the Utilities sector proved a drag on relative performance. While not typically core to the Fund’s strategy of emphasizing growth first, and income as a secondary consideration, this sector was a key beneficiary of this year’s market flows. Partially offsetting this were the Fund’s positions in Utility-like names: Telecommunications giants AT&T and Verizon, which returned +22% and +25% for the fiscal year, respectively.
234 |
During the review period, the Fund had average bond and cash allocations of 34.7% and 6.7%, respectively. As a percentage of the Fund’s total assets, investment grade corporate bonds were the largest bond allocation at 22.0%, followed by U.S. government securities at 6.1%, mortgage-backed securities at 6.3%, and municipal bonds at 0.2%.
The Fund’s fixed income holdings returned 5.65%, outperforming the 5.27% return of its benchmark, the BofA Merrill Lynch Broad Market Index. The Fund’s overweight in corporate bonds was a positive contributor to performance. Security selection, in general, detracted from performance as it was based on expectations for higher interest rates.
Thank you for placing your trust in Foresters Financial. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
235 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/16) | (9/30/16) | (4/1/16–9/30/16)* |
Class A Shares | 1.18% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,047.28 | $6.04 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.10 | $5.96 | |
Class B Shares | 1.95% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,043.46 | $9.91 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.30 | $9.77 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.82% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,046.55 | $4.20 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.90 | $4.14 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.77% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,049.76 | $3.95 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.15 | $3.89 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2016, |
and are based on the total market value of investments. |
236 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Total Return Fund (Class A shares), the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Total Return Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/06 with theoretical investments in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Indices”). The BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index tracks the performance of U.S. dollar denominated
237 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
investment grade debt publicly issued in the US domestic market, including U.S. Treasuries, quasi-government securities, corporates, covered bonds and residential mortgage pass-through securities. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
*Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/16) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 6.23%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 6.40%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and Standard & Poor’s 500 Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.
**The Since Inception returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations for those classes).
† The Index return is for ten years. The S&P 500 Index return and BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index return since inception of the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are 12.01% and 2.98%, respectively.
238 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
COMMON STOCKS—59.4% | |||
Consumer Discretionary—11.6% | |||
136,000 | American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | $ 2,428,960 | |
88,300 | Big Lots, Inc. | 4,216,325 | |
86,230 | BorgWarner, Inc. | 3,033,571 | |
130,975 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 7,169,571 | |
93,200 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 6,647,024 | |
111,100 | DSW, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,275,328 | |
51,060 | Foot Locker, Inc. | 3,457,783 | |
206,750 | Ford Motor Company | 2,495,472 | |
41,860 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 3,535,077 | |
53,830 | Home Depot, Inc. | 6,926,844 | |
121,973 | Johnson Controls International, PLC | 5,675,404 | |
66,845 | L Brands, Inc. | 4,730,621 | |
51,100 | Lear Corporation | 6,194,342 | |
69,700 | Magna International, Inc. | 2,993,615 | |
67,300 | * | Michaels Companies, Inc. | 1,626,641 |
284,522 | Newell Brands, Inc. | 14,982,929 | |
25,300 | Oxford Industries, Inc. | 1,712,810 | |
60,500 | Penske Automotive Group, Inc. | 2,914,890 | |
84,300 | * | Select Comfort Corporation | 1,820,880 |
150,700 | Stein Mart, Inc. | 956,945 | |
91,910 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 6,008,157 | |
48,800 | Walt Disney Company | 4,531,568 | |
18,175 | Whirlpool Corporation | 2,947,258 | |
51,890 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 3,493,754 | |
102,775,769 | |||
Consumer Staples—5.8% | |||
17,900 | AdvancePierre Foods Holdings, Inc. | 493,324 | |
146,350 | Altria Group, Inc. | 9,253,710 | |
16,000 | B&G Foods, Inc. – Class “A” | 786,880 | |
105,890 | Coca-Cola Company | 4,481,265 | |
87,960 | CVS Health Corporation | 7,827,560 | |
168,530 | Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize NV (ADR) | 3,817,204 | |
42,500 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,753,150 | |
49,360 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 5,368,887 | |
90,310 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 8,779,938 | |
31,400 | Procter & Gamble Company | 2,818,150 | |
25,600 | Tyson Foods, Inc. – Class “A” | 1,911,552 | |
46,870 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 3,380,264 | |
51,671,884 |
239 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Energy—3.4% | |||
37,375 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | $ 2,368,080 | |
9,400 | Chevron Corporation | 967,448 | |
61,800 | ConocoPhillips | 2,686,446 | |
51,575 | Devon Energy Corporation | 2,274,973 | |
61,402 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 5,359,167 | |
26,500 | Hess Corporation | 1,420,930 | |
80,101 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 1,266,397 | |
102,250 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 4,150,327 | |
26,150 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 1,906,858 | |
31,000 | PBF Energy, Inc. – Class “A” | 701,840 | |
34,450 | Phillips 66 | 2,774,948 | |
14,700 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 1,156,008 | |
105,660 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 2,935,235 | |
29,968,657 | |||
Financials—7.4% | |||
69,170 | American Express Company | 4,429,647 | |
64,100 | American International Group, Inc. | 3,803,694 | |
46,825 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 4,671,730 | |
39,100 | Chubb, Ltd. | 4,912,915 | |
157,300 | Citizens Financial Group, Inc. | 3,886,883 | |
99,410 | Discover Financial Services | 5,621,635 | |
167,600 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 3,234,680 | |
15,000 | iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (ETF) | 2,320,650 | |
46,100 | iShares Russell 2000 ETF (ETF) | 5,726,081 | |
119,380 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 7,949,514 | |
61,700 | MetLife, Inc. | 2,741,331 | |
15,730 | Morgan Stanley | 504,304 | |
44,625 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 4,020,266 | |
75,900 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 3,208,293 | |
107,345 | U.S. Bancorp | 4,604,027 | |
86,120 | Wells Fargo & Company | 3,813,394 | |
65,449,044 | |||
Health Care—11.4% | |||
129,660 | Abbott Laboratories | 5,483,321 | |
102,900 | AbbVie, Inc. | 6,489,903 | |
11,076 | * | Allergan, PLC | 2,550,914 |
78,500 | * | AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. | 2,501,795 |
49,569 | Baxter International, Inc. | 2,359,484 | |
52,300 | Cardinal Health, Inc. | 4,063,710 |
240 |
Shares | Security | Value | |
Health Care (continued) | |||
33,500 | * | Centene Corporation | $ 2,243,160 |
48,832 | * | Express Scripts Holding Company | 3,444,121 |
98,380 | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 7,783,826 | |
79,700 | Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc. | 4,939,806 | |
81,400 | Johnson & Johnson | 9,615,782 | |
2,791 | * | Mallinckrodt, PLC | 194,756 |
21,250 | McKesson Corporation | 3,543,438 | |
49,400 | Medtronic, PLC | 4,268,160 | |
99,745 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 6,225,085 | |
37,225 | * | Mylan NV | 1,419,017 |
900 | * | Patheon Holdings NV | 26,667 |
266,729 | Pfizer, Inc. | 9,034,111 | |
93,475 | Phibro Animal Health Corporation – Class “A” | 2,540,651 | |
19,515 | Shire, PLC (ADR) | 3,783,178 | |
78,095 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 12,421,791 | |
68,600 | * | VWR Corporation | 1,945,496 |
78,215 | Zoetis, Inc. | 4,067,962 | |
100,946,134 | |||
Industrials—5.0% | |||
41,585 | 3M Company | 7,328,525 | |
108,350 | General Electric Company | 3,209,327 | |
63,000 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 7,345,170 | |
16,000 | Ingersoll-Rand, PLC | 1,087,040 | |
69,160 | ITT, Inc. | 2,478,694 | |
59,000 | Koninklijke Philips NV (ADR) | 1,745,810 | |
6,020 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 1,443,114 | |
39,100 | ManpowerGroup, Inc. | 2,825,366 | |
27,000 | Nielsen Holdings, PLC | 1,446,390 | |
17,900 | Robert Half International, Inc. | 677,694 | |
38,330 | Snap-On, Inc. | 5,824,627 | |
33,930 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 254,136 | |
55,450 | Textron, Inc. | 2,204,138 | |
118,610 | Triton International, Ltd. | 1,564,466 | |
46,030 | United Technologies Corporation | 4,676,648 | |
44,111,145 | |||
Information Technology—10.6% | |||
93,905 | Apple, Inc. | 10,615,960 | |
184,400 | Applied Materials, Inc. | 5,559,660 | |
227,275 | * | ARRIS International, PLC | 6,438,701 |
241 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2016
Shares | Security | Value | |
Information Technology (continued) | |||
26,525 | Broadcom, Ltd. | $ 4,576,093 | |
272,800 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 8,653,216 | |
32,568 | * | Dell Technologies, Inc. – Class “V” | 1,556,750 |
76,200 | * | eBay, Inc. | 2,506,980 |
266,505 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company | 6,062,989 | |
175,675 | Intel Corporation | 6,631,731 | |
22,800 | International Business Machines Corporation | 3,621,780 | |
78,885 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | 1,897,973 | |
61,980 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 2,167,441 | |
190,085 | Microsoft Corporation | 10,948,896 | |
27,040 | * | NXP Semiconductors NV | 2,758,350 |
106,790 | Oracle Corporation | 4,194,711 | |
90,720 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 6,214,320 | |
18,300 | Sabre Corporation | 515,694 | |
183,950 | Symantec Corporation | 4,617,145 | |
23,610 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 1,520,012 | |
72,200 | Travelport Worldwide, Ltd. | 1,085,166 | |
41,572 | Western Digital Corporation | 2,430,715 | |
94,574,283 | |||
Materials—.6% | |||
11,930 | Praxair, Inc. | 1,441,502 | |
41,310 | RPM International, Inc. | 2,219,173 | |
35,885 | Trinseo SA | 2,029,656 | |
5,690,331 | |||
Real Estate—1.5% | |||
176,125 | Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (REIT) | 4,894,514 | |
23,320 | Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 764,196 | |
200,413 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 2,563,282 | |
60,700 | Tanger Factory Outlet Centers, Inc. (REIT) | 2,364,872 | |
112,430 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 2,498,195 | |
13,085,059 | |||
Telecommunication Services—1.5% | |||
163,500 | AT&T, Inc. | 6,639,735 | |
130,725 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 6,795,086 | |
13,434,821 |
242 |
Shares or | |||
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Utilities—.6% | |||
138,800 | Exelon Corporation | $ 4,620,652 | |
24,445 | NiSource, Inc. | 589,369 | |
5,210,021 | |||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $364,071,942) | 526,917,148 | ||
CORPORATE BONDS—21.1% | |||
Aerospace/Defense—.2% | |||
$ 1,500M | Rolls-Royce, PLC, 3.625%, 10/14/2025 (a) | 1,586,970 | |
Agriculture—.1% | |||
1,100M | Cargill, Inc., 6%, 11/27/2017 (a) | 1,157,246 | |
Automotive—.4% | |||
1,100M | Johnson Controls, Inc., 5%, 3/30/2020 | 1,208,976 | |
2,000M | O’Reilly Automotive, Inc., 3.55%, 3/15/2026 | 2,124,356 | |
3,333,332 | |||
Chemicals—.9% | |||
2,000M | Agrium, Inc., 3.375%, 3/15/2025 | 2,064,236 | |
1,000M | CF Industries, Inc., 3.45%, 6/1/2023 | 1,009,011 | |
2,000M | Dow Chemical Co., 4.25%, 11/15/2020 | 2,173,402 | |
2,100M | LyondellBasell Industries NV, 6%, 11/15/2021 | 2,459,669 | |
7,706,318 | |||
Consumer Non Durables—.2% | |||
2,000M | Newell Brands, Inc., 4.2%, 4/1/2026 | 2,180,736 | |
Energy—1.6% | |||
1,600M | Canadian Oil Sands, Ltd., 7.75%, 5/15/2019 (a) | 1,797,122 | |
1,000M | DCP Midstream Operating, LP, 2.5%, 12/1/2017 | 997,500 | |
1,500M | Enbridge Energy Partners, LP, 4.2%, 9/15/2021 | 1,592,131 | |
1,100M | Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, LP, 3.45%, 2/15/2023 | 1,098,098 | |
1,000M | Magellan Midstream Partners, LP, 5%, 3/1/2026 | 1,141,381 | |
1,600M | Nabors Industries, Inc., 6.15%, 2/15/2018 | 1,665,976 | |
1,000M | ONEOK Partners, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2022 | 1,010,300 | |
1,500M | Spectra Energy Capital, LLC, 6.2%, 4/15/2018 | 1,587,182 | |
1,000M | Suncor Energy, Inc., 6.1%, 6/1/2018 | 1,074,555 | |
1,600M | Valero Energy Corp., 9.375%, 3/15/2019 | 1,884,614 | |
13,848,859 |
243 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Financial Services—2.9% | |||
$ 1,100M | American Express Co., 7%, 3/19/2018 | $ 1,186,944 | |
American International Group, Inc.: | |||
1,000M | 3.75%, 7/10/2025 | 1,050,759 | |
1,000M | 4.7%, 7/10/2035 | 1,086,185 | |
1,000M | Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 5.3%, 3/15/2020 | 1,114,297 | |
1,000M | Assured Guaranty U.S. Holding, Inc., 5%, 7/1/2024 | 1,119,082 | |
1,100M | BlackRock, Inc., 5%, 12/10/2019 | 1,220,914 | |
ERAC USA Finance, LLC: | |||
1,000M | 6.375%, 10/15/2017 (a) | 1,048,162 | |
1,000M | 4.5%, 8/16/2021 (a) | 1,108,380 | |
1,000M | 3.3%, 10/15/2022 (a) | 1,049,003 | |
2,000M | Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC, 8.125%, 1/15/2020 | 2,363,736 | |
General Electric Capital Corp.: | |||
1,000M | 4.65%, 10/17/2021 | 1,140,093 | |
1,500M | 6.75%, 3/15/2032 | 2,111,384 | |
2,100M | KeyBank NA, 3.4%, 5/20/2026 | 2,150,581 | |
2,000M | Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 4.95%, 5/1/2022 (a) | 2,234,464 | |
1,000M | Protective Life Corp., 7.375%, 10/15/2019 | 1,153,910 | |
2,000M | Prudential Financial, Inc., 7.375%, 6/15/2019 | 2,303,352 | |
1,000M | Siemens Financieringsmaatschappij NV, 5.75%, 10/17/2016 (a) | 1,001,733 | |
1,000M | State Street Corp., 3.55%, 8/18/2025 | 1,085,462 | |
25,528,441 | |||
Financials—5.6% | |||
Bank of America Corp.: | |||
3,600M | 4.1%, 7/24/2023 | 3,897,698 | |
1,000M | 5.875%, 2/7/2042 | 1,308,499 | |
Barclays Bank, PLC: | |||
1,100M | 6.75%, 5/22/2019 | 1,233,617 | |
1,000M | 5.125%, 1/8/2020 | 1,090,831 | |
1,000M | Capital One Financial Corp., 3.75%, 4/24/2024 | 1,063,414 | |
Citigroup, Inc.: | |||
3,600M | 6.125%, 11/21/2017 | 3,786,084 | |
1,000M | 8.5%, 5/22/2019 | 1,167,498 | |
1,000M | 4.5%, 1/14/2022 | 1,105,743 | |
1,500M | Deutsche Bank AG, 3.7%, 5/30/2024 | 1,438,752 | |
1,500M | Fifth Third Bancorp, 3.5%, 3/15/2022 | 1,591,769 | |
2,000M | General Motors Financial Co., 5.25%, 3/1/2026 | 2,200,600 | |
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: | |||
2,700M | 5.375%, 3/15/2020 | 2,992,183 | |
3,000M | 3.625%, 1/22/2023 | 3,174,105 | |
1,000M | 6.125%, 2/15/2033 | 1,263,566 |
244 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Financials (continued) | |||
JPMorgan Chase & Co.: | |||
$ 3,100M | 6%, 1/15/2018 | $ 3,275,807 | |
1,000M | 4.5%, 1/24/2022 | 1,108,101 | |
Morgan Stanley: | |||
2,550M | 6.625%, 4/1/2018 | 2,733,251 | |
3,000M | 5.5%, 7/28/2021 | 3,425,247 | |
1,600M | SunTrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 9/11/2017 | 1,665,357 | |
1,500M | UBS AG, 4.875%, 8/4/2020 | 1,670,004 | |
U.S. Bancorp: | |||
1,000M | 4.125%, 5/24/2021 | 1,108,947 | |
1,000M | 3.6%, 9/11/2024 | 1,072,851 | |
1,000M | Visa, Inc., 3.15%, 12/14/2025 | 1,057,568 | |
Wells Fargo & Co: | |||
1,600M | 4.60%, 4/1/2021 | 1,767,546 | |
3,500M | 3.45%, 2/13/2023 | 3,612,238 | |
49,811,276 | |||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—1.0% | |||
1,500M | Anheuser-Busch InBev Finance, Inc., 3.65%, 2/1/2026 | 1,614,126 | |
1,750M | Bunge Ltd. Finance Corp., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 2,053,095 | |
1,500M | Diageo Capital, PLC, 5.75%, 10/23/2017 | 1,570,126 | |
1,000M | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 6.82%, 5/1/2018 | 1,084,822 | |
1,000M | Ingredion, Inc., 4.625%, 11/1/2020 | 1,095,122 | |
1,000M | SABMiller Holdings, Inc., 3.75%, 1/15/2022 (a) | 1,083,440 | |
8,500,731 | |||
Food/Drug—.2% | |||
2,000M | CVS Health Corp., 3.875%, 7/20/2025 | 2,181,220 | |
Forest Products/Container—.2% | |||
2,000M | Rock-Tenn Co., 4.9%, 3/1/2022 | 2,250,036 | |
Health Care—.8% | |||
1,100M | Biogen, Inc., 6.875%, 3/1/2018 | 1,184,518 | |
2,100M | Express Scripts Holding Co., 4.75%, 11/15/2021 | 2,355,194 | |
1,500M | Gilead Sciences, Inc., 3.65%, 3/1/2026 | 1,616,378 | |
1,500M | Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings, 3.75%, 8/23/2022 | 1,601,112 | |
6,757,202 |
245 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Higher Education—.2% | |||
$ 1,750M | Yale University, 2.086%, 4/15/2019 | $ 1,792,571 | |
Information Technology—.4% | |||
1,500M | Apple, Inc., 2.5%, 2/9/2025 | 1,520,013 | |
1,000M | Diamond 1 Finance Corp., 3.48%, 6/1/2019 (a) | 1,029,120 | |
1,000M | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., 2.85%, 10/5/2018 (a) | 1,019,378 | |
3,568,511 | |||
Manufacturing—.5% | |||
1,000M | CRH America, Inc., 8.125%, 7/15/2018 | 1,106,678 | |
1,100M | Ingersoll-Rand Global Holdings Co., Ltd., 6.875%, 8/15/2018 | 1,209,758 | |
2,000M | Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.55%, 10/1/2017 | 2,101,860 | |
4,418,296 | |||
Media-Broadcasting—.6% | |||
1,000M | British Sky Broadcasting Group, PLC, 9.5%, 11/15/2018 (a) | 1,159,060 | |
Comcast Corp.: | |||
1,600M | 5.15%, 3/1/2020 | 1,794,874 | |
2,000M | 4.25%, 1/15/2033 | 2,225,344 | |
5,179,278 | |||
Media-Diversified—.2% | |||
1,000M | S&P Global, Inc., 5.9%, 11/15/2017 | 1,043,988 | |
1,000M | Time Warner, Inc., 3.6%, 7/15/2025 | 1,065,663 | |
2,109,651 | |||
Metals/Mining—.7% | |||
1,500M | Alcoa, Inc., 6.15%, 8/15/2020 | 1,659,375 | |
1,000M | Glencore Finance Canada, Ltd., 4.95%, 11/15/2021 (a) | 1,058,804 | |
1,500M | Newmont Mining Corp., 5.125%, 10/1/2019 | 1,638,231 | |
1,600M | Vale Overseas, Ltd., 5.625%, 9/15/2019 | 1,694,000 | |
6,050,410 | |||
Real Estate—1.4% | |||
2,000M | AvalonBay Communities, Inc., 3.5%, 11/15/2024 | 2,097,964 | |
1,000M | Boston Properties, LP, 5.875%, 10/15/2019 | 1,111,066 | |
500M | Digital Realty Trust, LP, 5.25%, 3/15/2021 | 559,602 | |
1,000M | ERP Operating, LP, 3.375%, 6/1/2025 | 1,045,705 | |
1,000M | HCP, Inc., 4.25%, 11/15/2023 | 1,051,529 | |
1,000M | Prologis, LP, 3.35%, 2/1/2021 | 1,058,279 |
246 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Real Estate (continued) | |||
$ 2,000M | Simon Property Group, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2024 | $ 2,126,152 | |
1,600M | Ventas Realty, LP, 4.75%, 6/1/2021 | 1,778,182 | |
1,500M | Welltower, Inc., 4%, 6/1/2025 | 1,593,408 | |
12,421,887 | |||
Retail-General Merchandise—.4% | |||
1,000M | Amazon.com, Inc., 4.8%, 12/5/2034 | 1,178,553 | |
2,000M | Home Depot, Inc., 5.875%, 12/16/2036 | 2,748,562 | |
3,927,115 | |||
Telecommunications—.4% | |||
1,500M | AT&T, Inc., 3.8%, 3/15/2022 | 1,608,615 | |
1,950M | Verizon Communications, Inc., 5.15%, 9/15/2023 | 2,274,985 | |
3,883,600 | |||
Transportation—.6% | |||
1,000M | Burlington North Santa Fe, LLC, 5.15%, 9/1/2043 | 1,246,540 | |
GATX Corp.: | |||
1,000M | 4.75%, 6/15/2022 | 1,116,184 | |
1,000M | 5.2%, 3/15/2044 | 1,081,817 | |
1,000M | Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP, 4.875%, 7/11/2022 (a) | 1,117,312 | |
1,000M | Southwest Airlines Co., 2.65%, 11/5/2020 | 1,027,228 | |
5,589,081 | |||
Utilities—1.6% | |||
1,000M | Duke Energy Progress, Inc., 4.15%, 12/1/2044 | 1,097,201 | |
1,000M | E.ON International Finance BV, 5.8%, 4/30/2018 (a) | 1,062,831 | |
1,000M | Electricite de France SA, 3.625%, 10/13/2025 (a) | 1,052,680 | |
2,000M | Entergy Arkansas, Inc., 4.95%, 12/15/2044 | 2,124,872 | |
1,500M | Exelon Generation Co., LLC, 5.2%, 10/1/2019 | 1,649,006 | |
2,000M | Ohio Power Co., 5.375%, 10/1/2021 | 2,291,216 | |
2,000M | Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co., 4%, 12/15/2044 | 2,133,698 | |
1,100M | Sempra Energy, 9.8%, 2/15/2019 | 1,302,938 | |
1,000M | South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., 5.45%, 2/1/2041 | 1,262,510 | |
13,976,952 | |||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $179,620,858) | 187,759,719 |
247 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | ||||
SECURITIES—6.9% | ||||
Fannie Mae—5.8% | ||||
$ 2,120M | 2.5%, 2/1/2030 – 10/18/2031 (b) | $ 2,197,623 | ||
14,056M | 3%, 3/1/2027 – 10/13/2046 (b) | 14,690,583 | ||
16,703M | 3.5%, 11/1/2028 – 10/13/2046 (b) | 17,655,244 | ||
8,127M | 4%, 12/1/2040 – 10/13/2046 (b) | 8,759,527 | ||
1,703M | 4.5%, 9/1/2040 | 1,871,850 | ||
2,599M | 5%, 4/1/2040 – 3/1/2042 | 2,921,869 | ||
903M | 5.5%, 5/1/2033 – 10/1/2039 | 1,030,245 | ||
738M | 6%, 5/1/2036 – 10/1/2040 | 848,001 | ||
322M | 6.5%, 11/1/2033 – 6/1/2036 | 370,643 | ||
577M | 7%, 3/1/2032 – 8/1/2032 | 636,847 | ||
50,982,432 | ||||
Freddie Mac—1.1% | ||||
2,180M | 3.5%, 8/1/2026 – 7/1/2044 | 2,332,024 | ||
1,135M | 4%, 7/1/2044 – 4/1/2045 | 1,218,315 | ||
4,767M | 4.5%, 10/1/2040 – 5/1/2044 | 5,268,358 | ||
1,111M | 5.5%, 5/1/2038 – 10/1/2039 | 1,271,038 | ||
10,089,735 | ||||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $60,139,242) | 61,072,167 | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—3.5% | ||||
5,000M | U.S. Treasury Bonds, 3.125%, 8/15/2044 | 5,836,720 | ||
U.S. Treasury Notes: | ||||
6,000M | 0.5222%, 1/31/2018 † | 6,015,816 | ||
14,000M | 0.625%, 1/15/2024 (TIPS) | 15,160,443 | ||
4,000M | 2%, 2/15/2023 | 4,156,092 | ||
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $30,278,716) | 31,169,071 | |||
ASSET BACKED SECURITIES—2.6% | ||||
Fixed Auto—1.7% | ||||
2,000M | Avis Budget Rental Car Funding AESOP, LLC, 2.97%, 2/20/2020 (a) | 2,040,350 | ||
900M | Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust, 1.85%, 7/15/2019 | 903,678 | ||
1,000M | GM Financial Auto Leasing Trust, 1.76%, 3/20/2020 | 1,001,933 | ||
1,600M | Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust, 1.3%, 3/16/2020 | 1,603,538 | ||
900M | Hertz Vehicle Financing Trust, 2.65%, 7/25/2022 (a) | 911,460 | ||
1,000M | Honda Auto Receivables Trust, 1.33%, 11/18/2022 | 999,448 | ||
1,150M | Nissan Auto Lease Trust, 1.65%, 10/15/2021 | 1,154,947 |
248 |
Principal | |||
Amount | Security | Value | |
Fixed Auto (continued) | |||
Nissan Auto Receivables Owner Trust: | |||
$ 2,500M | 1.79%, 1/17/2022 | $ 2,530,950 | |
900M | 1.18%, 1/15/2021 | 900,494 | |
650M | Toyota Auto Receivables Owner Trust, 1.32%, 11/15/2021 | 648,849 | |
2,200M | Volkswagen Auto Lease Trust, 1.25%, 12/20/2017 | 2,199,732 | |
14,895,379 | |||
Fixed Credit Cards—.9% | |||
Capital One Multi-Asset Execution Trust: | |||
1,000M | 1.33%, 6/15/2022 | 999,193 | |
1,900M | 2.08%, 3/15/2023 | 1,946,592 | |
Chase Issuance Trust: | |||
1,500M | 1.27%, 7/15/2021 | 1,500,862 | |
2,300M | 1.49%, 7/15/2022 | 2,309,568 | |
1,665M | Synchrony Credit Card Master Trust, 2.38%, 9/15/2023 | 1,711,543 | |
8,467,758 | |||
Total Value of Asset Backed Securities (cost $23,302,213) | 23,363,137 | ||
VARIABLE AND FLOATING RATE NOTES†—1.4% | |||
Municipal Bonds—1.0% | |||
3,000M | Mass. St. Hlth. & Edl. Facs. Auth., 0.84%, 8/15/2034 | 3,000,000 | |
3,000M | Mississippi Business Fin. Corp., 0.85%, 12/1/2030 | 3,000,000 | |
3,000M | Valdez, AK Marine Term. Rev., 0.76%, 12/1/2033 | 3,000,000 | |
9,000,000 | |||
U.S. Government Agency Obligations—.4% | |||
3,500M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.512%, 1/27/2017 | 3,501,606 | |
Total Value of Variable and Floating Rate Notes (cost $12,501,424) | 12,501,606 | ||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY OBLIGATIONS—.9% | |||
Fannie Mae: | |||
1,850M | 1.75%, 11/26/2019 | 1,892,186 | |
6,000M | 1.875%, 9/24/2026 | 5,978,022 | |
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $7,808,529) | 7,870,208 | ||
MUNICIPAL BONDS—.2% | |||
1,625M | Greater Orlando, FL Aviation Auth. Arpt. Facs. Rev., | ||
3.294%, 10/1/2032 (cost $1,625,000) (b) | 1,630,135 |
249 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2016
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—4.4% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$ 6,500M | 0.28%, 10/13/2016 | $ 6,499,675 | |||||
15,000M | 0.285%, 10/17/2016 | 14,998,950 | |||||
3,500M | 0.295%, 10/21/2016 | 3,499,685 | |||||
14,000M | 0.23%, 11/23/2016 | 13,995,842 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $38,992,178) | 38,994,152 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM CORPORATE NOTES—1.7% | |||||||
Automotive—.6% | |||||||
5,000M | Toyota Motor Credit Corp., 0.61%, 10/31/2016 | 4,998,814 | |||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—.6% | |||||||
5,000M | PepsiCo, Inc., 0.43%, 11/3/2016 (c) | 4,997,922 | |||||
Manufacturing—.5% | |||||||
5,000M | BASF SE, 0.7%, 11/22/2016 (c) | 4,996,194 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term Corporate Notes (cost $14,990,428) | 14,992,930 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $733,330,530) | 102.1 | % | 906,270,273 | ||||
Excess of Liabilties Over Other Assets | (2.1 | ) | (19,032,226) | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $887,238,047 |
* | Non-income producing | |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). | |
(b) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis (see | |
Note 1G). | ||
(c) | Security exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). | |
† | Interest rates on adjustable rate bonds are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates | |
shown are the rates in effect at September 30, 2016. | ||
Summary of Abbreviations: | ||
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust | |
TIPS | Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities |
250 |
The Fund’s assets and liabilities are classified into the following three levels based on the inputs used to value the assets or liabilities:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, U.S. Government securities are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value may not always be quoted prices in an active market.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2016:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 526,917,148 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 526,917,148 | ||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 187,759,719 | — | 187,759,719 | ||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 61,072,167 | — | 61,072,167 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 31,169,071 | — | 31,169,071 | ||||||||
Asset Backed Securities | — | 23,363,137 | — | 23,363,137 | ||||||||
Variable and Floating Rate Notes | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 9,000,000 | — | 9,000,000 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 3,501,606 | — | 3,501,606 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 7,870,208 | — | 7,870,208 | ||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 1,630,135 | — | 1,630,135 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 38,994,152 | — | 38,994,152 | ||||||||
Short-Term Corporate Notes | — | 14,992,930 | — | 14,992,930 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 526,917,148 | $ | 379,353,125 | $ | — | $ | 906,270,273 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common |
stocks, corporate bonds and asset backed securities. | |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, | |
2016. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period. |
See notes to financial statements | 251 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
September 30, 2016
CASH | BALANCED | FLOATING | FUND FOR | ||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | INCOME | RATE | INCOME | GOVERNMENT | |||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments in securities | |||||||||||||
At identified cost | $ | 123,235,358 | $ | 28,885,144 | $ | 133,830,373 | $ | 669,147,298 | $ | 332,370,342 | |||
At value (Note 1A) | $ | 123,235,358 | $ | 29,946,875 | $ | 134,868,261 | $ | 691,494,730 | $ | 339,148,883 | |||
Cash | 2,101,235 | 686,222 | 8,028,067 | 8,639,538 | 6,691,585 | ||||||||
Receivables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | — | 1,062,616 | 17,986,222 | 5,263,281 | ||||||||
Deposits at broker for futures contracts | — | 64,815 | — | — | — | ||||||||
Interest and dividends | 9,693 | 146,860 | 634,969 | 10,544,815 | 941,120 | ||||||||
Shares sold | — | 65,329 | 222,665 | 427,374 | 570,495 | ||||||||
Other assets | 6,997 | 1,096 | 8,583 | 37,601 | 18,586 | ||||||||
Total Assets | 125,353,283 | 30,911,197 | 144,825,161 | 729,130,280 | 352,633,950 | ||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | — | 830,026 | 9,965,871 | 22,034,456 | 18,719,862 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | 144,080 | 94,200 | 110,573 | 1,444,802 | 722,021 | ||||||||
Dividends payable | — | 631 | 39,031 | 555,485 | 34,960 | ||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | — | — | 48,330 | 424,814 | 149,727 | ||||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 36,195 | 2,702 | 23,664 | 95,865 | 40,990 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses | 43,685 | 42,196 | 93,800 | 85,773 | 39,133 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities | 223,960 | 969,755 | 10,281,269 | 24,641,195 | 19,706,693 | ||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 125,129,323 | $ | 29,941,442 | $ | 134,543,892 | $ | 704,489,085 | $ | 332,927,257 | |||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 125,129,323 | $ | 28,819,737 | $ | 137,679,848 | $ | 870,075,281 | $ | 340,436,505 | |||
Undistributed net investment income (deficit) | — | 23,213 | 25,946 | (2,746,245 | ) | 2,611 | |||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and futures contracts | — | 36,761 | (4,199,790 | ) | (185,187,383 | ) | (14,290,400 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized appreciation in value of investments and futures contracts | — | 1,061,731 | 1,037,888 | 22,347,432 | 6,778,541 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 125,129,323 | $ | 29,941,442 | $ | 134,543,892 | $ | 704,489,085 | $ | 332,927,257 |
252 | See notes to financial statements | 253 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
September 30, 2016
CASH | BALANCED | FLOATING | FUND FOR | ||||||||
MANAGEMENT | INCOME | RATE | INCOME | GOVERNMENT | |||||||
Net Assets: | |||||||||||
Class A | $ | 122,037,450 | $ | 29,675,752 | $ | 61,243,286 | $ | 571,028,385 | $ | 258,544,743 | |
Class B | $ | 248,044 | N/A | N/A | $ | 2,923,218 | $ | 2,061,844 | |||
Advisor Class | N/A | $ | 108,938 | $ | 61,844,136 | $ | 68,197,539 | $ | 64,370,045 | ||
Institutional Class | $ | 2,843,829 | $ | 156,752 | $ | 11,456,470 | $ | 62,339,943 | $ | 7,950,625 | |
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | |||||||||||
Class A | 122,037,450 | 2,772,692 | 6,343,116 | 230,378,827 | 23,829,606 | ||||||
Class B | 248,044 | N/A | N/A | 1,180,092 | 190,432 | ||||||
Advisor Class | N/A | 10,157 | 6,407,112 | 27,535,464 | 5,922,025 | ||||||
Institutional Class | 2,843,829 | 14,610 | 1,188,236 | 25,067,425 | 729,670 | ||||||
Net asset value and redemption price per share — Class A | $ | 1.00 | # | $ | 10.70 | $ | 9.66 | $ | 2.48 | $ | 10.85 |
Maximum offering price per share — Class A (Net asset value/.9425)* | N/A | $ | 11.35 | $ | 10.25 | $ | 2.63 | $ | 11.51 | ||
Net asset value and offering price per share — Class B** | $ | 1.00 | N/A | N/A | $ | 2.48 | $ | 10.83 | |||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | |||||||||||
per share — Advisor Class | N/A | $ | 10.73 | $ | 9.65 | $ | 2.48 | $ | 10.87 | ||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | |||||||||||
per share — Institutional Class | $ | 1.00 | $ | 10.73 | $ | 9.64 | $ | 2.49 | $ | 10.90 |
# | Also maximum offering price per share. |
* | On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced (Note 8). |
** | Redemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable |
(Note 8). |
254 | See notes to financial statements | 255 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
September 30, 2016
INTERNATIONAL | LIMITED | |||||||||||
OPPORTUNITIES | INVESTMENT | DURATION HIGH | STRATEGIC | |||||||||
BOND | GRADE | QUALITY BOND | INCOME | |||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||
Investments in securities: | ||||||||||||
Cost — Unaffiliated issuers | $ | 126,406,828 | $ | 558,625,536 | $ | 117,066,181 | $ | 7,498,863 | ||||
Cost — Affiliated issuers (Note 2) | — | — | — | 144,920,866 | ||||||||
Total cost of investments | $ | 126,406,828 | $ | 558,625,536 | $ | 117,066,181 | $ | 152,419,729 | ||||
Value — Unaffiliated issuers (Note 1A) | $ | 118,082,483 | $ | 588,082,731 | $ | 117,687,951 | $ | 7,499,315 | ||||
Value — Affiliated issuers (Note 2) | — | — | — | 141,242,164 | ||||||||
Total value of investments | 118,082,483 | 588,082,731 | 117,687,951 | 148,741,479 | ||||||||
Cash | 4,835,066 | 6,539,021 | 4,316,471 | 378,431 | ||||||||
Receivables: | ||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | 5,229,367 | — | — | ||||||||
Dividends and interest | 1,308,525 | 6,792,201 | 1,058,026 | 426,795 | ||||||||
Shares sold | 203,467 | 718,061 | 356,217 | 342,287 | ||||||||
Unrealized gain on foreign exchange contracts (Note 5) | 763,763 | — | — | — | ||||||||
Other assets | 6,906 | 31,163 | 5,896 | 7,970 | ||||||||
Total Assets | 125,200,210 | 607,392,544 | 123,424,561 | 149,896,962 | ||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||
Payables: | ||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | — | 10,877,693 | 1,856,531 | — | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | 216,458 | 976,840 | 136,449 | 209,081 | ||||||||
Dividends payable | — | 169,268 | 51,495 | 15,342 | ||||||||
Unrealized loss on foreign exchange contracts (Note 5) | 328,918 | — | — | — | ||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | 76,009 | 264,801 | 41,233 | 6,091 | ||||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 23,596 | 70,709 | 20,081 | 16,090 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses | 61,139 | 62,160 | 35,436 | 45,334 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities | 706,120 | 12,421,471 | 2,141,225 | 291,938 | ||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 124,494,090 | $ | 594,971,073 | $ | 121,283,336 | $ | 149,605,024 | ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | ||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 137,102,029 | $ | 582,349,808 | $ | 123,130,874 | $ | 155,297,898 | ||||
Undistributed net investment income (deficit) | (1,227,648 | ) | (13,492,471 | ) | (1,760,669 | ) | 46,786 | |||||
Accumulated net realized loss on investments | ||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | (3,488,727 | ) | (3,343,459 | ) | (708,639 | ) | (2,061,410 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value of investments | ||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | (7,891,564 | ) | 29,457,195 | 621,770 | (3,678,250 | ) | ||||||
Total | $ | 124,494,090 | $ | 594,971,073 | $ | 121,283,336 | $ | 149,605,024 |
256 | See notes to financial statements | 257 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
September 30, 2016
INTERNATIONAL | LIMITED | |||||||
OPPORTUNITIES | INVESTMENT | DURATION HIGH | STRATEGIC | |||||
BOND | GRADE | QUALITY BOND | INCOME | |||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||
Class A | $ | 65,456,406 | $ | 477,009,646 | $ | 48,342,154 | $ | 149,190,242 |
Class B | N/A | $ | 2,907,452 | N/A | N/A | |||
Advisor Class | $ | 50,749,150 | $ | 83,659,411 | $ | 50,645,043 | $ | 414,782 |
Institutional Class | $ | 8,288,534 | $ | 31,394,564 | $ | 22,296,139 | N/A | |
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | ||||||||
Class A | 7,104,608 | 48,192,371 | 5,002,478 | 15,731,047 | ||||
Class B | N/A | 295,821 | N/A | N/A | ||||
Advisor Class | 5,484,415 | 8,413,440 | 5,224,530 | 43,801 | ||||
Institutional Class | 892,133 | 3,163,349 | 2,297,911 | N/A | ||||
Net asset value and redemption price per share — Class A | $ | 9.21 | $ | 9.90 | $ | 9.66 | $ | 9.48 |
Maximum offering price per share — Class A (Net asset value/.9425)* | $ | 9.77 | $ | 10.50 | $ | 10.25 | $ | 10.06 |
Net asset value and offering price per share — Class B** | N/A | $ | 9.83 | N/A | N/A | |||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | ||||||||
per share — Advisor Class | $ | 9.25 | $ | 9.94 | $ | 9.69 | $ | 9.47 |
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | ||||||||
per share — Institutional Class | $ | 9.29 | $ | 9.92 | $ | 9.70 | N/A |
* | On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced (Note 8). |
** | Redemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable |
(Note 8). |
258 | See notes to financial statements | 259 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
HEDGED U.S. | ||||||||||||||||
COVERED CALL | EQUITY | GROWTH & | EQUITY | |||||||||||||
STRATEGY | INCOME | GLOBAL | INCOME | OPPORTUNITIES | INTERNATIONAL | |||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in securities | ||||||||||||||||
At identified cost | $ | 88,162,729 | $ | 435,138,450 | $ | 461,021,768 | $ | 1,141,661,789 | $ | 32,094,454 | $ | 220,114,564 | ||||
At value (Note 1A) | $ | 90,031,896 | $ | 587,069,920 | $ | 511,794,658 | $ | 1,750,633,055 | $ | 32,052,063 | $ | 293,273,177 | ||||
Cash | 6,889,872 | 80,625 | 1,208,501 | 767,015 | 1,723,423 | 2,814,894 | ||||||||||
Receivables: | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | 4,488,875 | 4,888,708 | 2,728,688 | 155,549 | 3,708,490 | ||||||||||
Options contracts sold | 85,264 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Deposits at broker for futures contracts | — | — | — | — | 364,117 | — | ||||||||||
Dividends and interest | 70,891 | 875,198 | 687,909 | 1,940,870 | 26,312 | 976,848 | ||||||||||
Shares sold | 1,364,205 | 516,968 | 397,451 | 1,050,540 | 840,743 | 354,851 | ||||||||||
Other assets | 62,363 | 30,825 | 26,643 | 91,816 | 78,351 | 15,202 | ||||||||||
Total Assets | 98,504,491 | 593,062,411 | 519,003,870 | 1,757,211,984 | 35,240,558 | 301,143,462 | ||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
Options written, at value (Note 5) | 2,065,788 | (a) | — | — | — | 75,817 | (b) | — | ||||||||
Payables: | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | 4,479,298 | 1,719,796 | 2,446,789 | 4,105,972 | 1,219,575 | 5,372,292 | ||||||||||
Shares redeemed | 28,337 | 1,054,167 | 747,706 | 3,214,858 | 685 | 365,023 | ||||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | 18,107 | 353,566 | 376,728 | 974,813 | 8,997 | 237,254 | ||||||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 16,097 | 72,006 | 65,495 | 219,024 | — | 63,912 | ||||||||||
Accrued expenses | 39,512 | 54,547 | 98,163 | 144,763 | 32,194 | 73,203 | ||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 6,647,139 | 3,254,082 | 3,734,881 | 8,659,430 | 1,337,268 | 6,111,684 | ||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 91,857,352 | $ | 589,808,329 | $ | 515,268,989 | $ | 1,748,552,554 | $ | 33,903,290 | $ | 295,031,778 | ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | ||||||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 90,154,815 | $ | 427,626,366 | $ | 485,934,724 | $ | 1,077,873,287 | $ | 33,933,371 | $ | 252,961,393 | ||||
Undistributed net investment income | 14,131 | 2,657,078 | 958,923 | 13,567,156 | 6,862 | 1,405,248 | ||||||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments, options and futures | ||||||||||||||||
contracts and foreign currency transactions | (265,660 | ) | 7,593,415 | (22,392,794 | ) | 48,140,845 | (7,734 | ) | (32,467,527 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value of investments, options | ||||||||||||||||
and futures contracts and foreign currency transactions | 1,954,066 | 151,931,470 | 50,768,136 | 608,971,266 | (29,209 | ) | 73,132,664 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 91,857,352 | $ | 589,808,329 | $ | 515,268,989 | $ | 1,748,552,554 | $ | 33,903,290 | $ | 295,031,778 |
(a) Premiums received fron written options $2,150,687 |
(b) Premiums received fron written options $89,006 |
260 | See notes to financial statements | 261 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
HEDGED U.S. | ||||||||||||
COVERED CALL | EQUITY | GROWTH & | EQUITY | |||||||||
STRATEGY | INCOME | GLOBAL | INCOME | OPPORTUNITIES | INTERNATIONAL | |||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 48,513,572 | $ | 529,339,483 | $ | 339,955,795 | $ | 1,588,422,578 | $ | 9,264,655 | $ | 209,204,980 |
Class B | N/A | $ | 3,445,593 | $ | 2,937,213 | $ | 17,047,475 | N/A | $ | 1,606,573 | ||
Advisor Class | $ | 39,129,351 | $ | 54,575,690 | $ | 169,088,212 | $ | 132,486,087 | $ | 24,539,481 | $ | 81,525,073 |
Institutional Class | $ | 4,214,429 | $ | 2,447,563 | $ | 3,287,769 | $ | 10,596,414 | $ | 99,154 | $ | 2,695,152 |
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | ||||||||||||
Class A | 4,684,004 | 54,463,029 | 46,545,113 | 73,848,823 | 934,953 | 15,260,200 | ||||||
Class B | N/A | 361,863 | 503,310 | 853,551 | N/A | 124,784 | ||||||
Advisor Class | 3,784,664 | 5,604,347 | 22,758,984 | 6,115,037 | 2,475,466 | 5,876,826 | ||||||
Institutional Class | 407,170 | 250,356 | 440,363 | 490,920 | 10,001 | 193,813 | ||||||
Net asset value and redemption price per share — Class A | $ | 10.36 | $ | 9.72 | $ | 7.30 | $ | 21.51 | $ | 9.91 | $ | 13.71 |
Maximum offering price per share — Class A (Net asset value/.9425)* | $ | 10.99 | $ | 10.31 | $ | 7.75 | $ | 22.82 | $ | 10.51 | $ | 14.55 |
Net asset value and offering price per share — Class B** | N/A | $ | 9.52 | $ | 5.84 | $ | 19.97 | N/A | $ | 12.87 | ||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | ||||||||||||
per share — Advisor Class | $ | 10.34 | $ | 9.74 | $ | 7.43 | $ | 21.67 | $ | 9.91 | $ | 13.87 |
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | ||||||||||||
per share — Institutional Class | $ | 10.35 | $ | 9.78 | $ | 7.47 | $ | 21.58 | $ | 9.91 | $ | 13.91 |
* | On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced (Note 8). |
** | Redemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable |
(Note 8). |
262 | See notes to financial statements | 263 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
REAL | SELECT | SPECIAL | TOTAL | ||||||||
OPPORTUNITY | ESTATE | GROWTH | SITUATIONS | RETURN | |||||||
Assets | |||||||||||
Investments in securities: | |||||||||||
At identified cost | $ | 713,208,526 | $ | 76,685,056 | $ | 387,068,766 | $ | 446,831,664 | $ | 733,330,530 | |
At value (Note 1A) | $ | 965,436,865 | $ | 80,565,179 | $ | 447,163,878 | $ | 541,344,869 | $ | 906,270,273 | |
Cash | 4,506,780 | 3,305,794 | 487,357 | 3,198,155 | 2,260,814 | ||||||
Receivables: | |||||||||||
Investment securities sold | 2,608,947 | — | — | 1,307,272 | 11,222,663 | ||||||
Dividends and interest | 781,611 | 419,637 | 216,523 | 400,931 | 3,053,647 | ||||||
Shares sold | 757,934 | 441,933 | 454,332 | 340,851 | 784,725 | ||||||
Other assets | 50,329 | 4,021 | 23,143 | 27,946 | 47,858 | ||||||
Total Assets | 974,142,466 | 84,736,564 | 448,345,233 | 546,620,024 | 923,639,980 | ||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | 3,865,220 | 963,332 | — | 3,037,746 | 33,669,099 | ||||||
Shares redeemed | 2,161,900 | 59,497 | 798,458 | 1,004,676 | 2,042,225 | ||||||
Accrued advisory fees | 560,554 | 55,304 | 269,988 | 351,676 | 505,247 | ||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 147,568 | 22,016 | 57,817 | 77,077 | 107,162 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | 76,500 | 44,868 | 43,069 | 55,214 | 78,200 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | 6,811,742 | 1,145,017 | 1,169,332 | 4,526,389 | 36,401,933 | ||||||
Net Assets | $ | 967,330,724 | $ | 83,591,547 | $ | 447,175,901 | $ | 542,093,635 | $ | 887,238,047 | |
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 675,394,537 | $ | 78,175,596 | $ | 330,373,685 | $ | 440,169,697 | $ | 708,042,291 | |
Undistributed net investment income (loss) | 5,121,270 | 418,336 | 1,158,311 | 3,143,654 | (4,119,893 | ) | |||||
Accumulated net realized gain on investments | 34,586,578 | 1,117,492 | 55,548,793 | 4,267,079 | 10,375,906 | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation in value of investments | 252,228,339 | 3,880,123 | 60,095,112 | 94,513,205 | 172,939,743 | ||||||
Total | $ | 967,330,724 | $ | 83,591,547 | $ | 447,175,901 | $ | 542,093,635 | $ | 887,238,047 |
264 | See notes to financial statements | 265 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
REAL | SELECT | SPECIAL | TOTAL | |||||||
OPPORTUNITY | ESTATE | GROWTH | SITUATIONS | RETURN | ||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Class A | $ | 880,273,513 | $ | 27,740,515 | $ | 373,279,013 | $ | 472,719,507 | $ | 845,725,584 |
Class B | $ | 8,605,757 | N/A | $ | 3,393,256 | $ | 3,300,940 | $ | 7,774,133 | |
Advisor Class | $ | 73,476,933 | $ | 55,217,506 | $ | 66,588,225 | $ | 59,158,891 | $ | 1,213,116 |
Institutional Class | $ | 4,974,521 | $ | 633,526 | $ | 3,915,407 | $ | 6,914,297 | $ | 32,525,214 |
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | ||||||||||
Class A | 23,607,513 | 2,742,740 | 33,197,615 | 17,946,483 | 44,505,887 | |||||
Class B | 289,958 | N/A | 346,345 | 163,877 | 415,832 | |||||
Advisor Class | 1,944,298 | 5,439,053 | 5,855,919 | 2,231,136 | 63,698 | |||||
Institutional Class | 131,914 | 62,505 | 342,882 | 259,451 | 1,700,438 | |||||
Net asset value and redemption price per share — Class A | $ | 37.29 | $ | 10.11 | $ | 11.24 | $ | 26.34 | $ | 19.00 |
Maximum offering price per share — Class A (Net asset value/.9425)* | $ | 39.56 | $ | 10.73 | $ | 11.93 | $ | 27.95 | $ | 20.16 |
Net asset value and offering price per share — Class B** | $ | 29.68 | N/A | $ | 9.80 | $ | 20.14 | $ | 18.70 | |
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | ||||||||||
per share — Advisor Class | $ | 37.79 | $ | 10.15 | $ | 11.37 | $ | 26.52 | $ | 19.04 |
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | ||||||||||
per share — Institutional Class | $ | 37.71 | $ | 10.14 | $ | 11.42 | $ | 26.65 | $ | 19.13 |
* | On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced (Note 8). |
** | Redemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable |
(Note 8). |
266 | See notes to financial statements | 267 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2016
CASH | BALANCED | FLOATING | FUND FOR | ||||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | INCOME | RATE | INCOME | GOVERNMENT | |||||||||||
Investment Income | |||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 388,195 | $ | 229,545 | $ | 5,012,889 | $ | 40,057,114 | $ | 8,270,726 | |||||
Dividends | — | 231,161 | (a) | — | — | — | |||||||||
Total income | 388,195 | 460,706 | 5,012,889 | 40,057,114 | 8,270,726 | ||||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | |||||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 596,957 | 116,985 | 759,777 | 4,851,079 | 2,200,805 | ||||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | N/A | 49,445 | 177,780 | 1,683,212 | 781,476 | ||||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | 2,063 | N/A | N/A | 30,456 | 23,225 | ||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class A | 471,909 | 17,577 | 98,369 | 898,844 | 415,398 | ||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class B | 1,006 | N/A | N/A | 8,725 | 6,435 | ||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Advisor Class | N/A | 23 | 97,424 | 96,453 | 89,881 | ||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Institutional Class | 818 | 43 | 3,647 | 15,315 | 4,379 | ||||||||||
Professional fees | 36,424 | 57,154 | 50,715 | 91,485 | 48,862 | ||||||||||
Custodian fees | 18,010 | 14,533 | 56,284 | 33,825 | 20,994 | ||||||||||
Registration fees | 68,897 | 89,925 | 56,107 | 69,904 | 75,230 | ||||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 18,438 | 13,242 | 15,273 | 35,671 | 16,440 | ||||||||||
Trustees' fees | 6,485 | 795 | 6,814 | 36,359 | 18,122 | ||||||||||
Other expenses | 25,876 | 8,367 | 75,069 | 129,631 | 51,334 | ||||||||||
Total expenses | 1,246,883 | 368,089 | 1,397,259 | 7,980,959 | 3,752,581 | ||||||||||
Less: Expenses waived and/or assumed (Note 3) | (855,008 | ) | (176,568 | ) | (161,613 | ) | (157,952 | ) | (366,801 | ) | |||||
Expenses paid indirectly (Note 1G) | (3,680 | ) | (623 | ) | (1,462 | ) | (14,597 | ) | (6,677 | ) | |||||
Net expenses | 388,195 | 190,898 | 1,234,184 | 7,808,410 | 3,379,103 | ||||||||||
Net investment income | — | 269,808 | 3,778,705 | 32,248,704 | 4,891,623 | ||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments and | |||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts (Note 2): | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |||||||||||||||
Investments | — | 43,393 | (1,259,700 | ) | (26,419,006 | ) | 1,505,888 | ||||||||
Futures contracts | — | 3,472 | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and futures contracts | — | 46,865 | (1,259,700 | ) | (26,419,006 | ) | 1,505,888 | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation on: | |||||||||||||||
Investments | — | 1,047,520 | 2,509,338 | 52,455,579 | 1,038,417 | ||||||||||
Futures contracts | — | 14,211 | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments and futures contracts | — | 1,061,731 | 2,509,338 | 52,455,579 | 1,038,417 | ||||||||||
Net gain on investments and futures contracts | — | 1,108,596 | 1,249,638 | 26,036,573 | 2,544,305 | ||||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | — | $ | 1,378,404 | $ | 5,028,343 | $ | 58,285,277 | $ | 7,435,928 |
(a) Net of $1,035 foreign taxes withheld |
268 | See notes to financial statements | 269 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2016
INTERNATIONAL | LIMITED | |||||||||||
OPPORTUNITIES | INVESTMENT | DURATION HIGH | STRATEGIC | |||||||||
BOND | GRADE | QUALITY BOND | INCOME | |||||||||
Investment Income | ||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 4,788,353 | (b) | $ | 21,452,327 | $ | 797,571 | $ | 11,415 | |||
Dividends from affiliate (Note 2) | — | — | — | 5,262,610 | ||||||||
Total income | 4,788,353 | 21,452,327 | 797,571 | 5,274,025 | ||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | ||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 977,108 | 3,691,506 | 661,293 | 69,999 | ||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | 201,745 | 1,392,845 | 112,142 | 418,943 | ||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | N/A | 32,065 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class A | 133,927 | 667,404 | 50,175 | 177,770 | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class B | N/A | 10,342 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Advisor Class | 91,889 | 99,499 | 97,956 | 64 | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Institutional Class | 3,041 | 6,116 | 4,881 | N/A | ||||||||
Professional fees | 37,497 | 78,002 | 29,860 | 59,767 | ||||||||
Custodian fees | 50,687 | 26,686 | 11,348 | 14,517 | ||||||||
Registration fees | 65,922 | 76,897 | 54,919 | 43,437 | ||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 13,663 | 25,947 | 9,360 | 9,089 | ||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 7,199 | 30,325 | 5,251 | 7,544 | ||||||||
Other expenses | 33,505 | 56,523 | 25,731 | 14,034 | ||||||||
Total expenses | 1,616,183 | 6,194,157 | 1,062,916 | 815,164 | ||||||||
Less: Expenses waived and/or assumed (Note 3) | (20,883 | ) | (605,056 | ) | (224,275 | ) | — | |||||
Expenses paid indirectly (Note 1G) | (527 | ) | (5,790 | ) | (2,135 | ) | (3,049 | ) | ||||
Net expenses | 1,594,773 | 5,583,311 | 836,506 | 812,115 | ||||||||
Net investment income | 3,193,580 | 15,869,016 | (38,935 | ) | 4,461,910 | |||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments, Affiliate and | ||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Transactions (Notes 2 and 7): | ||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | ||||||||||||
Investments | (3,214,724 | ) | 1,076,502 | 1,040,722 | — | |||||||
Affiliate | — | — | — | (2,090,537 | ) | |||||||
Capital gain distribution from affiliate | — | — | — | 245,434 | ||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | 1,267,704 | — | — | — | ||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, affiliate and | ||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | (1,947,020 | ) | 1,076,502 | 1,040,722 | (1,845,103 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation on: | ||||||||||||
Investments | 9,081,959 | 19,080,145 | 554,240 | — | ||||||||
Affiliate | — | — | — | 5,220,510 | ||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | 293,520 | — | — | — | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation on investments, affiliate and | ||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 9,375,479 | 19,080,145 | 554,240 | 5,220,510 | ||||||||
Net gain on investments, affiliate and foreign currency transactions | 7,428,459 | 20,156,647 | 1,594,962 | 3,375,407 | ||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | 10,622,039 | $ | 36,025,663 | $ | 1,556,027 | $ | 7,837,317 |
(b) Net of $46,509 foreign taxes withheld. |
270 | See notes to financial statements | 271 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2016
HEDGED U.S. | ||||||||||||||||||
COVERED CALL | EQUITY | GROWTH & | EQUITY | |||||||||||||||
STRATEGY | INCOME | GLOBAL | INCOME | OPPORTUNITIES | INTERNATIONAL | |||||||||||||
Investment Income | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | $ | 680,191 | $ | 16,734,847 | (a) | $ | 7,514,382 | (b) | $ | 41,948,796 | (c) | $ | 48,675 | (d) | $ | 5,751,426 | (e) | |
Interest | — | 74,435 | 35,324 | 103,068 | — | 22,876 | ||||||||||||
Total income | 680,191 | 16,809,282 | 7,549,706 | 42,051,864 | 48,675 | 5,774,302 | ||||||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | ||||||||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 212,550 | 4,186,513 | 4,587,844 | 11,734,894 | 33,039 | 2,737,581 | ||||||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | 30,909 | 1,548,515 | 1,009,226 | 4,648,835 | 1,825 | 616,877 | ||||||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | N/A | 36,183 | 31,508 | 178,409 | N/A | 18,020 | ||||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class A | 19,655 | 712,000 | 625,930 | 2,246,946 | 4,411 | 465,528 | ||||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class B | N/A | 10,338 | 8,980 | 39,410 | N/A | 6,642 | ||||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Advisor Class | 32,121 | 33,754 | 98,273 | 68,937 | 5,006 | 103,616 | ||||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Institutional Class | 454 | 1,219 | 944 | 2,137 | 3 | 764 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees. | 67,485 | 60,127 | 53,151 | 166,174 | 31,998 | 45,805 | ||||||||||||
Custodian fees | 5,719 | 25,916 | 121,850 | 57,957 | 2,000 | 87,589 | ||||||||||||
Registration fees | 39,820 | 80,979 | 80,902 | 97,888 | 13,000 | 77,952 | ||||||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 4,356 | 25,796 | 27,961 | 87,122 | 5,600 | 23,710 | ||||||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 1,097 | 30,911 | 26,032 | 93,556 | 78 | 15,033 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses | 4,835 | 57,885 | 95,577 | 154,375 | 4,399 | 47,628 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses | 419,001 | 6,810,136 | 6,768,178 | 19,576,640 | 101,359 | 4,246,745 | ||||||||||||
Less: Expenses waived and/or assumed (Note 3) | (130,501 | ) | — | (241,466 | ) | — | (59,255 | ) | — | |||||||||
Expenses paid indirectly (Note 1G) | (39 | ) | (5,963 | ) | (2,879 | ) | (15,535 | ) | — | (1,885 | ) | |||||||
Net expenses | 288,461 | 6,804,173 | 6,523,833 | 19,561,105 | 42,104 | 4,244,860 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income | 391,730 | 10,005,109 | 1,025,873 | 22,490,759 | 6,571 | 1,529,442 | ||||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments, Options and | ||||||||||||||||||
Future Contracts and Foreign Currency Transactions (Note 2): | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments | 668,557 | 10,787,447 | (22,096,320 | ) | 56,987,271 | (5,938 | ) | (2,622,386 | ) | |||||||||
Options contracts | (934,217 | ) | 122,170 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Futures contracts | — | — | — | — | (1,796 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Foreign currency transactions (Note 1C) | — | — | 3,548 | — | 291 | (124,145 | ) | |||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, options and futures contracts, and | ||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | (265,660 | ) | 10,909,617 | (22,092,772 | ) | 56,987,271 | (7,443 | ) | (2,746,531 | ) | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of: | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments | 1,869,167 | 54,327,047 | 50,366,959 | 110,786,808 | 113,482 | 24,787,108 | ||||||||||||
Options contracts | 84,899 | — | — | — | (68,296 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Futures contracts | — | — | — | — | (74,388 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Foreign currency transactions (Note 1C) | — | — | 1,030 | — | (7 | ) | 4,841 | |||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, options and futures | ||||||||||||||||||
contracts, and foreign currency transactions | 1,954,066 | 54,327,047 | 50,367,989 | 110,786,808 | (29,209 | ) | 24,791,949 | |||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on investments, options and futures contracts | ||||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 1,688,406 | 65,236,664 | 28,275,217 | 167,774,079 | (36,652 | ) | 22,045,418 | |||||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | 2,080,136 | $ | 75,241,773 | $ | 29,301,090 | $ | 190,264,838 | $ | (30,081 | ) | $ | 23,574,860 |
(a) Net of $46,891 foreign taxes withheld |
(b) Net of $424,227 foreign taxes withheld |
(c) Net of $96,112 foreign taxes withheld |
(d) Net of $332 foreign taxes withheld |
(e) Net of $454,001 foreign taxes withheld |
272 | See notes to financial statements | 273 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2016
REAL | SELECT | SPECIAL | TOTAL | ||||||||||||
OPPORTUNITY | ESTATE | GROWTH | SITUATIONS | RETURN | |||||||||||
Investment Income | |||||||||||||||
Dividends | $ | 16,065,836 | (f) | $ | 2,680,734 | $ | 6,360,169 | $ | 10,021,683 | $ | 12,601,521 | (g) | |||
Interest | 166,141 | — | 15,226 | 41,568 | 8,463,987 | ||||||||||
Total income | 16,231,977 | 2,680,734 | 6,375,395 | 10,063,251 | 21,065,508 | ||||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | |||||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 6,538,235 | 517,106 | 3,180,994 | 4,058,074 | 5,975,946 | ||||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | 2,541,086 | 56,497 | 1,096,012 | 1,331,553 | 2,453,286 | ||||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | 89,036 | N/A | 36,807 | 33,595 | 79,618 | ||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class A | 1,393,479 | 43,444 | 620,940 | 796,568 | 1,167,333 | ||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class B | 20,357 | N/A | 9,576 | 9,699 | 16,945 | ||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Advisor Class | 104,257 | 88,795 | 32,321 | 85,781 | 763 | ||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Institutional Class | 1,401 | 261 | 1,168 | 1,886 | 9,294 | ||||||||||
Professional fees | 92,869 | 65,966 | 48,430 | 54,076 | 86,694 | ||||||||||
Custodian fees | 37,463 | 6,953 | 19,949 | 30,936 | 42,815 | ||||||||||
Registration fees | 110,680 | 85,084 | 88,903 | 84,400 | 88,386 | ||||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 50,227 | 13,392 | 22,915 | 31,190 | 41,657 | ||||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 49,786 | 3,641 | 23,417 | 27,080 | 46,431 | ||||||||||
Other expenses | 91,381 | 14,931 | 38,073 | 52,852 | 103,242 | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Total expenses | 11,120,257 | 896,070 | 5,219,505 | 6,597,690 | 10,112,410 | ||||||||||
Less: Expenses waived and/or assumed (Note 3) | — | (61,030 | ) | — | (49,241 | ) | — | ||||||||
Expenses paid indirectly (Note 1G) | (9,638 | ) | (1,370 | ) | (2,564 | ) | (6,294 | ) | (10,585 | ) | |||||
Net expenses | 11,110,619 | 833,670 | 5,216,941 | 6,542,155 | 10,101,825 | ||||||||||
Net investment income | 5,121,358 | 1,847,064 | 1,158,454 | 3,521,096 | 10,963,683 | ||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments (Note 2): | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments | 34,586,627 | 1,257,211 | 55,974,501 | 5,047,355 | 15,428,099 | ||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 26,978,713 | 6,328,298 | (29,597,382 | ) | 42,543,717 | 42,876,523 | |||||||||
Net gain on investments | 61,565,340 | 7,585,509 | 26,377,119 | 47,591,072 | 58,304,622 | ||||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | 66,686,698 | $ | 9,432,573 | $ | 27,535,573 | $ | 51,112,168 | $ | 69,268,305 |
(f) Net of $17,643 foreign taxes withheld |
(g) Net of $28,889 foreign taxes withheld |
274 | See notes to financial statements | 275 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
CASH | BALANCED | FUND | |||||||||||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | INCOME | FLOATING RATE | FOR INCOME | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | * | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 269,808 | $ | 3,778,705 | $ | 2,924,668 | $ | 32,248,704 | $ | 30,891,498 | |||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | |||||||||||||||||||||
and futures contracts | — | — | 46,865 | (1,259,700 | ) | (2,287,337 | ) | (26,419,006 | ) | (15,066,252 | ) | ||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments and | |||||||||||||||||||||
futures contracts | — | — | 1,061,731 | 2,509,338 | (547,178 | ) | 52,455,579 | (35,320,472 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | — | — | 1,378,404 | 5,028,343 | 90,153 | 58,285,277 | (19,495,226 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | — | — | (252,943 | ) | (1,721,284 | ) | (1,651,739 | ) | (28,095,986 | ) | (31,122,480 | ) | |||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | — | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | (122,232 | ) | (170,838 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | N/A | N/A | (1,621 | ) | (1,732,407 | ) | (1,387,153 | ) | (2,868,632 | ) | (2,154,704 | ) | |||||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | — | — | (2,135 | ) | (397,164 | ) | (203,347 | ) | (2,837,180 | ) | (2,774,913 | ) | |||||||||
Total dividends | — | — | (256,699 | ) | (3,850,855 | ) | (3,242,239 | ) | (33,924,030 | ) | (36,222,935 | ) | |||||||||
Share Transactions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 220,000,674 | 188,680,191 | 29,666,925 | 13,988,494 | 16,227,394 | 44,844,582 | 56,372,212 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | — | 249,169 | 1,656,758 | 1,602,638 | 24,326,941 | 26,804,294 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (207,529,163 | ) | (187,201,946 | ) | (1,345,357 | ) | (12,013,129 | ) | (9,445,295 | ) | (85,357,155 | ) | (89,743,444 | ) | |||||||
12,471,511 | 1,478,245 | 28,570,737 | 3,632,123 | 8,384,737 | (16,185,632 | ) | (6,566,938 | ) | |||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 508,240 | 402,446 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 153,274 | 335,094 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | 98,032 | 133,486 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (547,558 | ) | (519,111 | ) | N/A | N/A | N/A | (808,011 | ) | (1,489,533 | ) | ||||||||||
(39,318 | ) | (116,665 | ) | N/A | N/A | N/A | (556,705 | ) | (1,020,953 | ) | |||||||||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | N/A | 100,010 | 19,186,634 | 21,065,167 | 28,446,083 | 31,328,538 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | N/A | N/A | 1,622 | 1,726,808 | 1,382,219 | 2,860,325 | 2,117,050 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | N/A | — | (9,702,326 | ) | (5,957,676 | ) | (7,394,038 | ) | (19,431,815 | ) | ||||||||||
N/A | N/A | 101,632 | 11,211,116 | 16,489,710 | 23,912,370 | 14,013,773 | |||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 1,575,243 | 1,209,104 | 146,631 | 4,679,951 | 11,763,251 | 19,288,098 | 12,712,337 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | — | 2,135 | 7,919 | 25,267 | 154,245 | 607,766 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (997,942 | ) | (1,537,953 | ) | (1,398 | ) | (3,845,745 | ) | (6,462,400 | ) | (10,511,393 | ) | (380,862 | ) | |||||||
577,301 | (328,849 | ) | 147,368 | 842,125 | 5,326,118 | 8,930,950 | 12,939,241 | ||||||||||||||
Net increase from share transactions | 13,009,494 | 1,032,731 | 28,819,737 | 15,685,364 | 30,200,565 | 16,100,983 | 19,365,123 | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 13,009,494 | 1,032,731 | 29,941,442 | 16,862,852 | 27,048,479 | 40,462,230 | (36,353,038 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 112,119,829 | 111,087,098 | — | 117,681,040 | 90,632,561 | 664,026,855 | 700,379,893 | ||||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 125,129,323 | $ | 112,119,829 | $ | 29,941,442 | $ | 134,543,892 | $ | 117,681,040 | $ | 704,489,085 | $ | 664,026,855 | |||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 23,213 | $ | 25,946 | $ | (337,720 | ) | $ | (2,746,245 | ) | $ | (6,658,667 | ) |
*From October 1, 2015 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016. |
276 | See notes to financial statements | 277 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
CASH | BALANCED | FUND | |||||||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | INCOME | FLOATING RATE | FOR INCOME | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | * | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 220,000,674 | 188,680,191 | 2,877,326 | 1,468,052 | 1,666,860 | 18,679,753 | 22,197,151 | ||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | — | 23,750 | 173,895 | 164,946 | 10,132,558 | 10,597,619 | ||||||||||
Redeemed | (207,529,163 | ) | (187,201,946 | ) | (128,384 | ) | (1,258,018 | ) | (972,258 | ) | (35,594,874 | ) | (35,402,127 | ) | |||
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | 12,471,511 | 1,478,245 | 2,772,692 | 383,929 | 859,548 | (6,782,563 | ) | (2,607,357 | ) | ||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 508,240 | 402,446 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 64,132 | 133,419 | ||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | 40,884 | 52,815 | ||||||||||
Redeemed | (547,558 | ) | (519,111 | ) | N/A | N/A | N/A | (339,786 | ) | (584,990 | ) | ||||||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | (39,318 | ) | (116,665 | ) | N/A | N/A | N/A | (234,770 | ) | (398,756 | ) | ||||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | N/A | N/A | 10,001 | 2,011,796 | 2,163,592 | 11,961,264 | 12,284,664 | ||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | N/A | N/A | 156 | 181,286 | 142,291 | 1,188,864 | 838,705 | ||||||||||
Redeemed | N/A | N/A | — | (1,017,251 | ) | (611,893 | ) | (3,075,131 | ) | (7,666,834 | ) | ||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Net increase in Advisor Class shares outstanding | N/A | N/A | 10,157 | 1,175,831 | 1,693,990 | 10,074,997 | 5,456,535 | ||||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 1,575,243 | 1,209,104 | 14,537 | 496,651 | 1,211,598 | 7,917,239 | 4,969,991 | ||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | — | 204 | 832 | 2,603 | 63,982 | 238,961 | ||||||||||
Redeemed | (997,942 | ) | (1,537,953 | ) | (131 | ) | (401,689 | ) | (662,209 | ) | (4,457,424 | ) | (151,240 | ) | |||
| |||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||
shares outstanding | 577,301 | (328,849 | ) | 14,610 | 95,794 | 551,992 | 3,523,797 | 5,057,712 |
*From October 1, 2015 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016. |
278 | See notes to financial statements | 279 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
INTERNATIONAL | LIMITED DURATION | |||||||||||||||||||||||
GOVERNMENT | OPPORTUNITIES BOND | INVESTMENT GRADE | HIGH QUALITY BOND | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 4,891,623 | $ | 5,495,197 | $ | 3,193,580 | $ | 1,954,192 | $ | 15,869,016 | $ | 15,986,319 | $ | (38,935 | ) | $ | 327,829 | |||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 1,505,888 | 508,308 | (1,947,020 | ) | (1,276,847 | ) | 1,076,502 | 4,891,028 | 1,040,722 | (5,345 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions. | 1,038,417 | 595,745 | 9,375,479 | (14,673,919 | ) | 19,080,145 | (14,533,465 | ) | 554,240 | 160,513 | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 7,435,928 | 6,599,250 | 10,622,039 | (13,996,574 | ) | 36,025,663 | 6,343,882 | 1,556,027 | 482,997 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | (5,098,278 | ) | (6,284,056 | ) | (989,781 | ) | (2,294,314 | ) | (17,167,268 | ) | (18,811,340 | ) | (832,049 | ) | (374,031 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | (25,367 | ) | (40,261 | ) | N/A | N/A | (89,798 | ) | (137,263 | ) | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | (1,234,888 | ) | (983,837 | ) | (838,724 | ) | (1,318,823 | ) | (2,761,769 | ) | (2,173,339 | ) | (1,167,608 | ) | (727,935 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | (345,265 | ) | (277,127 | ) | (195,704 | ) | (586,454 | ) | (855,941 | ) | (1,004,576 | ) | (476,781 | ) | (122,625 | ) | ||||||||
Total dividends | (6,703,798 | ) | (7,585,281 | ) | (2,024,209 | ) | (4,199,591 | ) | (20,874,776 | ) | (22,126,518 | ) | (2,476,438 | ) | (1,224,591 | ) | ||||||||
Share Transactions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 37,665,852 | 22,736,328 | 6,401,813 | 10,795,963 | 72,485,945 | 64,028,514 | 29,155,089 | 20,758,682 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | 4,827,126 | 5,929,898 | 949,631 | 2,206,234 | 16,052,698 | 17,580,395 | 809,386 | 368,085 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (50,293,578 | ) | (51,829,306 | ) | (15,650,271 | ) | (13,802,724 | ) | (82,482,076 | ) | (84,613,640 | ) | (8,134,265 | ) | (2,923,219 | ) | ||||||||
(7,800,600 | ) | (23,163,080 | ) | (8,298,827 | ) | (800,527 | ) | 6,056,567 | (3,004,731 | ) | 21,830,210 | 18,203,548 | ||||||||||||
Class B: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 229,389 | 227,686 | N/A | N/A | 415,040 | 480,991 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | 24,407 | 38,392 | N/A | N/A | 86,756 | 132,854 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (712,548 | ) | (1,001,688 | ) | N/A | N/A | (1,299,936 | ) | (1,606,746 | ) | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
(458,752 | ) | (735,610 | ) | N/A | N/A | (798,140 | ) | (992,901 | ) | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
Advisor Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 22,608,318 | 20,916,906 | 20,843,533 | 24,726,998 | 31,066,280 | 27,816,452 | 17,582,400 | 16,943,269 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | 1,230,638 | 980,039 | 836,307 | 1,314,831 | 2,752,476 | 2,161,838 | 1,160,847 | 726,768 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (9,845,019 | ) | (5,282,685 | ) | (25,621,311 | ) | (3,203,191 | ) | (15,965,377 | ) | (9,123,361 | ) | (8,132,877 | ) | (2,406,247 | ) | ||||||||
13,993,937 | 16,614,260 | (3,941,471 | ) | 22,838,638 | 17,853,379 | 20,854,929 | 10,610,370 | 15,263,790 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 4,623,534 | 18,491,366 | 773,078 | 5,543,928 | 19,457,559 | 6,813,608 | 18,700,486 | 7,903,190 | ||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | 13,151 | 68,616 | 8,650 | 117,098 | 69,861 | 258,070 | 3,113 | 23,070 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (10,762,966 | ) | (15,338,142 | ) | (12,047,796 | ) | (163,462 | ) | (3,784,887 | ) | (13,616,604 | ) | (3,041,711 | ) | (6,235,545 | ) | ||||||||
(6,126,281 | ) | 3,221,840 | (11,266,068 | ) | 5,497,564 | 15,742,533 | (6,544,926 | ) | 15,661,888 | 1,690,715 | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from share transactions | (391,696 | ) | (4,062,590 | ) | (23,506,366 | ) | 27,535,675 | 38,854,339 | 10,312,371 | 48,102,468 | 35,158,053 | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 340,434 | (5,048,621 | ) | (14,908,536 | ) | 9,339,510 | 54,005,226 | (5,470,265 | ) | 47,182,057 | 34,416,459 | |||||||||||||
Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 332,586,823 | 337,635,444 | 139,402,626 | 130,063,116 | 540,965,847 | 546,436,112 | 74,101,279 | 39,684,820 | ||||||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 332,927,257 | $ | 332,586,823 | $ | 124,494,090 | $ | 139,402,626 | $ | 594,971,073 | $ | 540,965,847 | $ | 121,283,336 | $ | 74,101,279 | ||||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | 2,611 | $ | 96,314 | $ | (1,227,648 | ) | $ | (4,123,681 | ) | $ | (13,492,471 | ) | $ | (10,606,832 | ) | $ | (1,760,669 | ) | $ | (661,994 | ) |
280 | See notes to financial statements | 281 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
INTERNATIONAL | LIMITED DURATION | ||||||||||||||||
GOVERNMENT | OPPORTUNITIES BOND | INVESTMENT GRADE | HIGH QUALITY BOND | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 3,482,260 | 2,088,784 | 722,896 | 1,143,107 | 7,462,492 | 6,481,146 | 3,007,505 | 2,109,083 | |||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | 446,507 | 544,048 | 110,382 | 236,312 | 1,653,812 | 1,778,652 | 83,518 | 37,457 | |||||||||
Redeemed | (4,653,033 | ) | (4,761,934 | ) | (1,771,836 | ) | (1,480,513 | ) | (8,501,494 | ) | (8,571,448 | ) | (838,923 | ) | (297,576 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | (724,266 | ) | (2,129,102 | ) | (938,558 | ) | (101,094 | ) | 614,810 | (311,650 | ) | 2,252,100 | 1,848,964 | ||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 21,319 | 20,883 | N/A | N/A | 43,568 | 48,899 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | 2,263 | 3,530 | N/A | N/A | 9,020 | 13,513 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (65,981 | ) | (92,010 | ) | N/A | N/A | (135,398 | ) | (162,547 | ) | N/A | N/A | |||||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | (42,399 | ) | (67,597 | ) | N/A | N/A | (82,810 | ) | (100,135 | ) | N/A | N/A | |||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 2,086,604 | 1,921,902 | 2,351,297 | 2,652,774 | 3,183,454 | 2,813,445 | 1,807,222 | 1,716,139 | |||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | 113,619 | 89,969 | 96,941 | 141,696 | 282,150 | 218,769 | 119,401 | 73,663 | |||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (908,097 | ) | (485,035 | ) | (2,853,135 | ) | (341,032 | ) | (1,633,088 | ) | (920,368 | ) | (835,583 | ) | (244,128 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in Advisor Class shares | |||||||||||||||||
outstanding | 1,292,126 | 1,526,836 | (404,897 | ) | 2,453,438 | 1,832,516 | 2,111,846 | 1,091,040 | 1,545,674 | ||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 427,044 | 1,695,349 | 87,003 | 586,609 | 1,984,468 | 686,431 | 1,922,294 | 801,095 | |||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | 1,211 | 6,280 | 1,000 | 12,596 | 7,178 | 26,108 | 320 | 2,338 | |||||||||
Redeemed | (988,228 | ) | (1,398,152 | ) | (1,397,456 | ) | (17,746 | ) | (383,038 | ) | (1,398,255 | ) | (312,617 | ) | (632,276 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in Institutional Class shares | |||||||||||||||||
outstanding | (559,973 | ) | 303,477 | (1,309,453 | ) | 581,459 | 1,608,608 | (685,716 | ) | 1,609,997 | 171,157 |
282 | See notes to financial statements | 283 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
STRATEGIC INCOME | ||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | ||||||
Net investment income | $ | 4,461,910 | $ | 4,269,180 | ||
Net realized loss on investments and affiliate | (2,090,537 | ) | (229,431 | ) | ||
Capital gain distributions from affiliate (Note 2) | 245,434 | 274,361 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | ||||||
and affiliate | 5,220,510 | (7,633,115 | ) | |||
| ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | ||||||
from operations | 7,837,317 | (3,319,005 | ) | |||
Distributions to Shareholders | ||||||
Net investment income – Class A | (4,718,986 | ) | (4,250,570 | ) | ||
Net investment income – Class B | N/A | N/A | ||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | (13,306 | ) | (13,030 | ) | ||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | N/A | N/A | ||||
Net realized gains – Class A | (253,425 | ) | (801,079 | ) | ||
Net realized gains – Class B | N/A | N/A | ||||
Net realized gains – Advisor Class | (571 | ) | (2,497 | ) | ||
Net realized gains – Institutional Class | N/A | N/A | ||||
Total distributions | (4,986,288 | ) | (5,067,176 | ) | ||
| ||||||
Share Transactions | ||||||
Class A: | ||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 32,016,312 | 51,014,186 | ||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 4,778,695 | 4,892,843 | ||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (22,181,166 | ) | (17,348,984 | ) | ||
14,613,841 | 38,558,045 | |||||
Class B: | ||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | N/A | ||||
Reinvestment of distributions | N/A | N/A | ||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | N/A | ||||
N/A | N/A | |||||
Advisor Class: | ||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 165,581 | 183,408 | ||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 13,877 | 15,496 | ||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (78,602 | ) | (194,201 | ) | ||
100,856 | 4,703 | |||||
Institutional Class: | ||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | N/A | ||||
Reinvestment of distributions | N/A | N/A | ||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | N/A | ||||
N/A | N/A | |||||
Net increase from share transactions | 14,714,697 | 38,562,748 | ||||
| ||||||
Net increase in net assets | 17,565,726 | 30,176,567 | ||||
| ||||||
Net Assets | ||||||
Beginning of year | 132,039,298 | 101,862,731 | ||||
End of year† | $ | 149,605,024 | $ | 132,039,298 | ||
†Includes undistributed net investment income of | $ | 46,786 | $ | 317,168 |
284 | See notes to financial statements |
STRATEGIC INCOME | ||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||
Shares Issued and Redeemed | ||||||
Class A: | ||||||
Sold | 3,429,263 | 5,237,519 | ||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 513,348 | 503,915 | ||||
Redeemed | (2,380,044 | ) | (1,790,431 | ) | ||
Net increase in Class A shares outstanding | 1,562,567 | 3,951,003 | ||||
Class B: | ||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | N/A | ||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | N/A | N/A | ||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | N/A | ||||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | N/A | N/A | ||||
Advisor Class: | ||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 17,852 | 18,657 | ||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 1,492 | 1,596 | ||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (8,463 | ) | (19,853 | ) | ||
Net increase in Advisor Class shares outstanding | 10,881 | 400 | ||||
Institutional Class: | ||||||
Sold | N/A | N/A | ||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | N/A | N/A | ||||
Redeemed | N/A | N/A | ||||
Net increase in Institutional Class shares outstanding | N/A | N/A |
285 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
COVERED CALL | |||||||||||||||||||||
STRATEGY | EQUITY INCOME | GLOBAL | GROWTH & INCOME | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | * | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 391,730 | $ | 10,005,109 | $ | 8,834,644 | $ | 1,025,873 | $ | 354,718 | $ | 22,490,759 | $ | 16,766,700 | |||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, options and | |||||||||||||||||||||
futures contracts, and foreign currency transactions | (265,660 | ) | 10,909,617 | 19,155,363 | (22,092,772 | ) | 25,797,010 | 56,987,271 | 94,097,022 | ||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of | |||||||||||||||||||||
investments, options and futures contracts, and | |||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 1,954,066 | 54,327,047 | (52,104,589 | ) | 50,367,989 | (25,481,813 | ) | 110,786,808 | (207,594,775 | ) | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 2,080,136 | 75,241,773 | (24,114,582 | ) | 29,301,090 | 669,915 | 190,264,838 | (96,731,053 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | (122,166 | ) | (8,682,440 | ) | (7,764,142 | ) | (128,304 | ) | — | (17,472,549 | ) | (13,548,001 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | N/A | (33,687 | ) | (35,071 | ) | — | — | (74,135 | ) | (47,198 | ) | ||||||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | (229,075 | ) | (969,565 | ) | (640,384 | ) | (177,083 | ) | — | (2,011,454 | ) | (1,481,022 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | (26,358 | ) | (109,638 | ) | (150,672 | ) | (4,497 | ) | — | (141,364 | ) | (109,473 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized gains – Class A | — | (19,115,339 | ) | (23,687,499 | ) | (18,139,773 | ) | (57,930,649 | ) | (68,462,248 | ) | (74,526,500 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized gains – Class B | N/A | (145,747 | ) | (250,819 | ) | (220,201 | ) | (798,140 | ) | (899,318 | ) | (1,191,667 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized gains – Advisor Class | — | (1,660,873 | ) | (1,557,015 | ) | (6,790,693 | ) | (12,698,968 | ) | (6,915,132 | ) | (6,144,693 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized gains – Institutional Class | — | (325,937 | ) | (368,685 | ) | (159,100 | ) | (522,230 | ) | (430,015 | ) | (449,195 | ) | ||||||||
Total distributions | (377,599 | ) | (31,043,226 | ) | (34,454,287 | ) | (25,619,651 | ) | (71,949,987 | ) | (96,406,215 | ) | (97,497,749 | ) | |||||||
Share Transactions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 48,782,331 | 61,467,757 | 72,214,654 | 35,052,068 | 39,149,881 | 151,969,755 | 176,073,369 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 120,752 | 27,486,375 | 31,157,447 | 18,063,683 | 57,247,510 | 85,343,880 | 87,532,440 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (982,520 | ) | (84,852,696 | ) | (75,721,110 | ) | (45,984,668 | ) | (42,810,677 | ) | (231,283,130 | ) | (224,370,769 | ) | |||||||
47,920,563 | 4,101,436 | 27,650,991 | 7,131,083 | 53,586,714 | 6,030,505 | 39,235,040 | |||||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | 242,709 | 405,159 | 239,411 | 528,779 | 1,453,400 | 1,676,093 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | N/A | 179,411 | 284,695 | 220,201 | 796,759 | 971,884 | 1,236,146 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | (1,092,424 | ) | (2,114,353 | ) | (864,944 | ) | (1,190,031 | ) | (5,559,988 | ) | (6,693,763 | ) | ||||||||
N/A | (670,304 | ) | (1,424,499 | ) | (405,332 | ) | 135,507 | (3,134,704 | ) | (3,781,524 | ) | ||||||||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 48,595,028 | 20,703,026 | 22,718,011 | 58,533,768 | 61,955,545 | 60,847,247 | 69,126,846 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 228,031 | 2,609,004 | 2,187,179 | 6,964,959 | 12,687,159 | 8,881,725 | 7,597,309 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (10,671,187 | ) | (10,774,411 | ) | (14,707,043 | ) | (13,225,742 | ) | (11,240,272 | ) | (85,290,088 | ) | (43,145,322 | ) | |||||||
38,151,872 | 12,537,619 | 10,198,147 | 52,272,985 | 63,402,432 | (15,561,116 | ) | 33,578,833 | ||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 4,081,405 | 3,761,509 | 3,376,843 | 328,204 | 392,755 | 942,301 | 1,078,751 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 2,023 | 273,351 | 154,468 | 163,598 | 522,230 | 571,379 | 558,667 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (1,048 | ) | (11,837,447 | ) | (205,211 | ) | (201,119 | ) | (492,398 | ) | (882,614 | ) | (914,920 | ) | |||||||
4,082,380 | (7,802,587 | ) | 3,326,100 | 290,683 | 422,587 | 631,066 | 722,498 | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from share transactions | 90,154,815 | 8,166,164 | 39,750,739 | 59,289,419 | 117,547,240 | (12,034,249 | ) | 69,754,847 | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 91,857,352 | 52,364,711 | (18,818,130 | ) | 62,970,858 | 46,267,168 | 81,824,374 | (124,473,955 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | — | 537,443,618 | 556,261,748 | 452,298,131 | 406,030,963 | 1,666,728,180 | 1,791,202,135 | ||||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 91,857,352 | $ | 589,808,329 | $ | 537,443,618 | $ | 515,268,989 | $ | 452,298,131 | $ | 1,748,552,554 | $ | 1,666,728,180 | |||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income of | $ | 14,131 | $ | 2,657,078 | $ | 2,447,299 | $ | 958,293 | $ | 239,384 | $ | 13,567,156 | $ | 5,909,198 |
*From April 1, 2016 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016. |
286 | See notes to financial statements | 287 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
COVERED CALL | |||||||||||||||
STRATEGY | EQUITY INCOME | GLOBAL | GROWTH & INCOME | ||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | * | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||
Sold | 4,767,539 | 6,555,770 | 7,336,596 | 4,915,279 | 4,901,776 | 7,381,569 | 7,787,049 | ||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 11,707 | 2,962,868 | 3,209,850 | 2,460,992 | 7,684,230 | 4,133,027 | 3,935,976 | ||||||||
Redeemed | (95,242 | ) | (9,037,443 | ) | (7,705,002 | ) | (6,463,775 | ) | (5,352,471 | ) | (11,210,394 | ) | (9,912,533 | ) | |
Net increase in Class A shares outstanding | 4,684,004 | 481,195 | 2,841,444 | 912,496 | 7,233,535 | 304,202 | 1,810,492 | ||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||
Sold | N/A | 26,441 | 41,958 | 41,598 | 78,767 | 76,305 | 79,295 | ||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | N/A | 19,752 | 29,766 | 37,322 | 130,402 | 50,645 | 59,459 | ||||||||
Redeemed | N/A | (120,318 | ) | (218,351 | ) | (150,696 | ) | (179,418 | ) | (291,680 | ) | (316,708 | ) | ||
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares outstanding | N/A | (74,125 | ) | (146,627 | ) | (71,776 | ) | 29,751 | (164,730 | ) | (177,954 | ) | |||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||
Sold | 4,818,883 | 2,188,222 | 2,306,935 | 8,092,269 | 7,646,436 | 2,931,409 | 3,040,101 | ||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 22,348 | 280,602 | 225,617 | 936,150 | 1,684,881 | 427,659 | 340,669 | ||||||||
Redeemed | (1,056,567 | ) | (1,138,072 | ) | (1,476,879 | ) | (1,838,151 | ) | (1,398,555 | ) | (4,145,892 | ) | (1,865,063 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in Advisor Class shares outstanding | 3,784,664 | 1,330,752 | 1,055,673 | 7,190,268 | 7,932,762 | (786,824 | ) | 1,515,707 | |||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||
Sold | 407,074 | 391,950 | 347,901 | 46,001 | 48,763 | 46,308 | 47,708 | ||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 196 | 29,340 | 15,831 | 21,901 | 69,078 | 27,620 | 25,118 | ||||||||
Redeemed | (100 | ) | (1,251,685 | ) | (20,738 | ) | (27,423 | ) | (61,001 | ) | (42,961 | ) | (40,741 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in Institutional Class shares | |||||||||||||||
outstanding | 407,170 | (830,395 | ) | 342,994 | 40,479 | 56,840 | 30,967 | 32,085 |
*From April 1, 2016 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016. |
288 | See notes to financial statements | 289 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY | |||||||||||||||||||||
OPPORTUNITIES | INTERNATIONAL | OPPORTUNITY | REAL ESTATE | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | * | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ** | ||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 6,571 | $ | 1,529,442 | $ | 1,177,991 | $ | 5,121,358 | $ | 1,035,051 | $ | 1,847,064 | $ | 404,033 | |||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, options and futures | |||||||||||||||||||||
contracts, and foreign currency transactions | (7,443 | ) | (2,746,531 | ) | (7,234,671 | ) | 34,586,627 | 79,081,123 | 1,257,211 | 24,636 | |||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments, | |||||||||||||||||||||
options and futures contracts, and foreign | |||||||||||||||||||||
currency transactions | (29,209 | ) | 24,791,949 | (1,841,871 | ) | 26,978,713 | (92,521,856 | ) | 6,328,298 | (2,448,175 | ) | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | (30,081 | ) | 23,574,860 | (7,898,551 | ) | 66,686,698 | (12,405,682 | ) | 9,432,573 | (2,019,506 | ) | ||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | — | (811,325 | ) | (712,515 | ) | (932,093 | ) | (1,230,423 | ) | (374,698 | ) | (68,828 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | N/A | (4,061 | ) | — | — | — | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | — | (315,211 | ) | (140,251 | ) | (93,491 | ) | (78,489 | ) | (1,064,535 | ) | (309,011 | ) | ||||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | — | (12,370 | ) | (18,281 | ) | (9,572 | ) | (18,948 | ) | (22,157 | ) | (8,900 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized gains – Class A | — | — | — | (69,557,929 | ) | (53,444,769 | ) | (35,427 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class B | N/A | — | — | (945,973 | ) | (913,751 | ) | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Advisor Class | — | — | — | (4,434,485 | ) | (2,495,521 | ) | (111,064 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Net realized gains – Institutional Class | — | — | — | (363,565 | ) | (255,417 | ) | (2,496 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Total distributions | — | (1,142,967 | ) | (871,047 | ) | (76,337,108 | ) | (58,437,318 | ) | (1,610,377 | ) | (386,739 | ) | ||||||||
Share Transactions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 9,273,891 | 28,098,007 | 34,322,329 | 124,866,504 | 136,372,505 | 18,454,657 | 12,123,983 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | — | 804,813 | 707,912 | 69,999,981 | 54,304,871 | 395,757 | 67,795 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (10,686 | ) | (31,080,873 | ) | (26,787,203 | ) | (124,056,665 | ) | (111,164,893 | ) | (4,353,175 | ) | (301,713 | ) | |||||||
9,263,205 | (2,178,053 | ) | 8,243,038 | 70,809,820 | 79,512,483 | 14,497,239 | 11,890,065 | ||||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | 132,109 | 194,517 | 788,145 | 880,576 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | N/A | 4,038 | — | 940,954 | 913,334 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | (760,543 | ) | (920,495 | ) | (2,435,194 | ) | (3,260,835 | ) | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||
N/A | (624,396 | ) | (725,978 | ) | (706,095 | ) | (1,466,925 | ) | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 24,590,674 | 27,538,775 | 30,826,438 | 33,137,811 | 26,801,133 | 18,737,198 | 43,112,696 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | — | 314,171 | 139,818 | 4,476,994 | 2,559,289 | 1,170,197 | 308,971 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (20,518 | ) | (9,640,858 | ) | (6,399,457 | ) | (12,691,626 | ) | (12,916,191 | ) | (11,348,437 | ) | (765,928 | ) | |||||||
24,570,156 | 18,212,088 | 24,566,799 | 24,923,179 | 16,444,231 | 8,558,958 | 42,655,739 | |||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 100,010 | 368,590 | 444,822 | 1,029,771 | 1,039,954 | 511,240 | 1,048,520 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | — | 12,370 | 18,281 | 373,137 | 274,365 | 24,653 | 8,900 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | — | (245,254 | ) | (395,447 | ) | (645,729 | ) | (593,271 | ) | (1,019,222 | ) | (496 | ) | ||||||||
100,010 | 135,706 | 67,656 | 757,179 | 721,048 | (483,329 | ) | 1,056,924 | ||||||||||||||
Net increase from share transactions | 33,933,371 | 15,545,345 | 32,151,515 | 95,784,083 | 95,210,837 | 22,572,868 | 55,602,728 | ||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets | 33,903,290 | 37,977,238 | 23,381,917 | 86,133,673 | 24,367,837 | 30,395,064 | 53,196,483 | ||||||||||||||
Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | — | 257,054,540 | 233,672,623 | 881,197,051 | 856,829,214 | 53,196,483 | — | ||||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 33,903,290 | $ | 295,031,778 | $ | 257,054,540 | $ | 967,330,724 | $ | 881,197,051 | $ | 83,591,547 | $ | 53,196,483 | |||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income of | $ | 6,862 | $ | 1,405,248 | $ | 1,142,919 | $ | 5,121,270 | $ | 1,035,020 | $ | 418,336 | $ | 17,294 |
*From August 1, 2016 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016. |
**From April 6, 2015 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2015. |
290 | See notes to financial statements | 291 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY | |||||||||||||||
OPPORTUNITIES | INTERNATIONAL | OPPORTUNITY | REAL ESTATE | ||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | * | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ** | ||||||
Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||
Sold | 936,023 | 2,127,784 | 2,600,533 | 3,446,512 | 3,318,481 | 1,855,661 | 1,299,792 | ||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | — | 60,467 | 54,835 | 1,920,966 | 1,372,375 | 39,622 | 7,665 | ||||||||
Redeemed | (1,070 | ) | (2,343,185 | ) | (2,031,442 | ) | (3,431,848 | ) | (2,705,324 | ) | (426,479 | ) | (33,521 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | 934,953 | (154,934 | ) | 623,926 | 1,935,630 | 1,985,532 | 1,468,804 | 1,273,936 | |||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | 10,638 | 15,517 | 27,316 | 26,080 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | N/A | 321 | — | 32,258 | 28,077 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | (61,282 | ) | (73,691 | ) | (83,444 | ) | (96,523 | ) | N/A | N/A | ||||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | N/A | (50,323 | ) | (58,174 | ) | (23,870 | ) | (42,366 | ) | N/A | N/A | ||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 2,477,541 | 2,058,313 | 2,303,344 | 903,793 | 644,299 | 1,916,747 | 4,594,793 | ||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | — | 23,393 | 10,772 | 121,493 | 64,158 | 117,391 | 34,846 | ||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (2,075 | ) | (720,035 | ) | (484,106 | ) | (346,735 | ) | (310,019 | ) | (1,140,297 | ) | (84,427 | ) | |
Net increase in Advisor Class shares outstanding | 2,475,466 | 1,361,671 | 1,830,010 | 678,551 | 398,438 | 893,841 | 4,545,212 | ||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||
Sold | 10,001 | 27,762 | 33,320 | 28,565 | 25,177 | 49,689 | 106,509 | ||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | — | 920 | 1,407 | 10,159 | 6,904 | 2,490 | 1,005 | ||||||||
Redeemed | — | (18,468 | ) | (29,837 | ) | (17,889 | ) | (14,276 | ) | (97,131 | ) | (57 | ) | ||
Net increase (decrease) in Institutional Class shares | |||||||||||||||
outstanding | 10,001 | 10,214 | 4,890 | 20,835 | 17,805 | (44,952 | ) | 107,457 |
*From August 1, 2016 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016. |
**From April 6, 2015 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2015. |
292 | See notes to financial statements | 293 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
SELECT GROWTH | SPECIAL SITUATIONS | TOTAL RETURN | ||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 1,158,454 | $ | 788,190 | $ | 3,521,096 | $ | 443,836 | $ | 10,963,683 | $ | 8,897,828 | ||||||
Net realized gain on investments | 55,974,501 | 46,613,802 | 5,047,355 | 29,671,829 | 15,428,099 | 26,452,055 | ||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | (29,597,382 | ) | (25,403,387 | ) | 42,543,717 | (30,358,590 | ) | 42,876,523 | (60,504,263 | ) | ||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | ||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 27,535,573 | 21,998,605 | 51,112,168 | (242,925 | ) | 69,268,305 | (25,154,380 | ) | ||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income — Class A | (632,707 | ) | (33,918 | ) | (320,349 | ) | (614,851 | ) | (12,018,647 | ) | (11,458,210 | ) | ||||||
Net investment income — Class B | (352 | ) | — | — | — | (57,057 | ) | (28,623 | ) | |||||||||
Net investment income — Advisor Class | (144,240 | ) | (23,472 | ) | (61,500 | ) | (83,726 | ) | (17,508 | ) | (19,854 | ) | ||||||
Net investment income — Institutional Class | (10,456 | ) | (4,324 | ) | (10,970 | ) | (33,545 | ) | (532,976 | ) | (333,411 | ) | ||||||
Net realized gains — Class A | (34,595,217 | ) | — | (24,838,426 | ) | (22,889,551 | ) | (18,715,227 | ) | (26,531,506 | ) | |||||||
Net realized gains — Class B | (437,191 | ) | — | (251,921 | ) | (282,955 | ) | (193,359 | ) | (334,083 | ) | |||||||
Net realized gains — Advisor Class | (4,961,052 | ) | — | (2,451,492 | ) | (1,540,363 | ) | (24,883 | ) | (45,598 | ) | |||||||
Net realized gains — Institutional Class | (349,535 | ) | — | (334,021 | ) | (307,598 | ) | (709,203 | ) | (97,905 | ) | |||||||
Total distributions | (41,130,750 | ) | (61,714 | ) | (28,268,679 | ) | (25,752,589 | ) | (32,268,860 | ) | (38,849,190 | ) | ||||||
Share Transactions | ||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 53,942,655 | 54,416,494 | 57,114,576 | 62,551,504 | 119,860,031 | 146,851,394 | ||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 34,969,346 | 33,809 | 24,976,809 | 23,373,326 | 30,372,755 | 37,605,795 | ||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (56,220,661 | ) | (52,380,060 | ) | (61,105,843 | ) | (56,620,386 | ) | (124,013,108 | ) | (106,907,221 | ) | ||||||
32,691,340 | 2,070,243 | 20,985,542 | 29,304,444 | 26,219,678 | 77,549,968 | |||||||||||||
Class B: | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 384,843 | 429,281 | 340,490 | 405,103 | 743,681 | 1,026,008 | ||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 428,944 | — | 251,791 | 282,325 | 249,778 | 362,686 | ||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (1,280,290 | ) | (1,488,363 | ) | (961,049 | ) | (1,245,404 | ) | (1,817,144 | ) | (2,508,178 | ) | ||||||
(466,503 | ) | (1,059,082 | ) | (368,768 | ) | (557,976 | ) | (823,685 | ) | (1,119,484 | ) | |||||||
Advisor Class: | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 24,704,923 | 23,956,222 | 21,179,680 | 18,421,121 | 913,254 | 502,020 | ||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 5,025,297 | 23,442 | 2,498,447 | 1,621,689 | 37,391 | 62,481 | ||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (8,735,085 | ) | (10,552,736 | ) | (6,267,393 | ) | (5,321,986 | ) | (743,012 | ) | (1,615,735 | ) | ||||||
20,995,135 | 13,426,928 | 17,410,734 | 14,720,824 | 207,633 | (1,051,234 | ) | ||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 632,475 | 802,590 | 802,716 | 795,472 | 1,087,423 | 30,633,716 | ||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 359,991 | 4,324 | 344,991 | 341,142 | 1,242,180 | 431,287 | ||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (594,620 | ) | (450,856 | ) | (472,929 | ) | (666,944 | ) | (1,865,316 | ) | (631,455 | ) | ||||||
397,846 | 356,058 | 674,778 | 469,670 | 464,287 | 30,433,548 | |||||||||||||
Net increase from share transactions | 53,617,818 | 14,794,147 | 38,702,286 | 43,936,962 | 26,067,913 | 105,812,798 | ||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets | 40,022,641 | 36,731,038 | 61,545,775 | 17,941,448 | 63,067,358 | 41,809,228 | ||||||||||||
Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 407,153,260 | 370,422,222 | 480,547,860 | 462,606,412 | 824,170,689 | 782,361,461 | ||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 447,175,901 | $ | 407,153,260 | $ | 542,093,635 | $ | 480,547,860 | $ | 887,238,047 | $ | 824,170,689 | ||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | 1,158,311 | $ | 787,612 | $ | 3,143,654 | $ | 15,377 | $ | (4,119,893 | ) | $ | (4,740,199 | ) |
294 | See notes to financial statements | 295 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
SELECT GROWTH | SPECIAL SITUATIONS | TOTAL RETURN | |||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||
Sold | 4,874,467 | 4,524,618 | 2,313,645 | 2,296,761 | 6,498,557 | 7,527,965 | |||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 3,125,053 | 2,865 | 1,003,488 | 892,452 | 1,652,437 | 1,955,683 | |||||||
Redeemed | (5,093,990 | ) | (4,363,924 | ) | (2,472,288 | ) | (2,072,629 | ) | (6,721,953 | ) | (5,496,779 | ) | |
Net increase in Class A shares outstanding | 2,905,530 | 163,559 | 844,845 | 1,116,584 | 1,429,041 | 3,986,869 | |||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 38,378 | 40,379 | 18,036 | 18,935 | 41,142 | 53,736 | |||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 43,725 | — | 13,148 | 13,685 | 13,816 | 19,166 | |||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (132,379 | ) | (139,374 | ) | (50,124 | ) | (58,315 | ) | (100,497 | ) | (131,276 | ) | |
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | (50,276 | ) | (98,995 | ) | (18,940 | ) | (25,695 | ) | (45,539 | ) | (58,374 | ) | |
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 2,202,432 | 1,974,720 | 854,224 | 670,808 | 47,824 | 25,472 | |||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 445,505 | 1,978 | 99,938 | 61,802 | 2,025 | 3,241 | |||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (782,048 | ) | (883,130 | ) | (251,602 | ) | (194,572 | ) | (39,591 | ) | (82,493 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in Advisor Class shares | 1,865,889 | 1,093,568 | 702,560 | 538,038 | 10,258 | (53,780 | ) | ||||||
outstanding | |||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||
Sold | 57,585 | 66,313 | 32,960 | 29,003 | 58,841 | 1,538,175 | |||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 31,802 | 364 | 13,745 | 12,966 | 67,216 | 22,600 | |||||||
Redeemed | (53,039 | ) | (36,602 | ) | (19,072 | ) | (24,349 | ) | (100,652 | ) | (32,545 | ) | |
Net increase in Institutional Class shares outstanding | |||||||||||||
36,348 | 30,075 | 27,633 | 17,620 | 25,405 | 1,528,230 |
296 | See notes to financial statements | 297 |
Notes to Financial Statements
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
1. Significant Accounting Policies— First Investors Income Funds (“Income Funds”) and First Investors Equity Funds (“Equity Funds”), each a Delaware statutory trust (each a “Trust”, collectively, “the Trusts”), are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) as open-end management investment companies and operate as series funds. The Income Funds issue shares of beneficial interest in the Cash Management Fund, Balanced Income Fund (commenced operations October 1, 2015), Floating Rate Fund, Fund For Income, Government Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund and Strategic Income Fund. All of the Income Funds are diversified funds except International Opportunities Bond Fund which is a non-diversified fund. The Equity Funds issue shares of beneficial interest in the Covered Call Strategy Fund (commenced operations on April 1, 2016), Equity Income Fund, Global Fund, Growth & Income Fund, Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (commenced operations on August 1, 2016), International Fund, Opportunity Fund, Real Estate Fund, Select Growth Fund, Special Situations Fund and Total Return Fund (each a “Fund”, collectively, “the Funds”). All of the Equity Funds are diversified funds, except Real Estate Fund which is a non-diversified fund. The Trusts account separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each Fund. The objective of each Fund as of September 30, 2016, is as follows:
Cash Management Fund seeks to earn a high rate of current income consistent with the preservation of capital and maintenance of liquidity.
Balanced Income Fund seeks income as its primary objective and has a secondary objective of capital appreciation.
Floating Rate Fund seeks a high level of current income.
Fund For Income seeks high current income.
Government Fund seeks to achieve a significant level of current income which is consistent with security and liquidity of principal.
International Opportunities Bond Fund seeks total return consisting of income and capital appreciation.
Investment Grade Fund seeks to generate a maximum level of income consistent with investment in investment grade debt securities.
Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund seeks current income consistent with low volatility of principal.
Strategic Income Fund seeks a high level of current income.
Covered Call Strategy Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
298 |
Equity Income Fund seeks total return.
Global Fund seeks long-term capital growth.
Growth & Income Fund seeks long-term growth of capital and current income.
Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund seeks total return and, secondarily, capital appreciation.
International Fund primarily seeks long-term capital growth.
Opportunity Fund seeks long-term capital growth.
Real Estate Fund seeks total return.
Select Growth Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Special Situations Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Total Return Fund seeks high, long-term total investment return consistent with moderate investment risk.
A. Security Valuation—Except as provided below, a security listed or traded on an exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market is valued at its last sale price on the exchange or market where the security is principally traded, and lacking any sales, the security is valued at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices. Securities traded in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market (including securities listed on exchanges whose primary market is believed to be OTC) are valued at the mean between the last bid and asked prices based on quotes furnished by a market maker for such securities or an authorized pricing service. Fixed income securities, other than short-term debt securities held by the Cash Management Fund, are priced based upon valuations that are provided by a pricing service. Other securities may also be priced based upon valuations that are provided by pricing services approved by the Trusts’ Board of Trustees (the “Board”). The pricing services consider security type, rating, market condition and yield data as well as market quotations, prices provided by market makers and other available information in determining value. The net asset value of the Strategic Income Fund is derived from the net asset values of the underlying Funds in which it invests.
The Funds monitor for significant events occurring prior to the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange that could have a material impact on the value of any securities that are held by the Funds. Examples of such events include trading halts, natural disasters, political events and issuer-specific developments. If the Valuation Committee of Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”) decides that such events warrant using fair value estimates, it will take such events into consideration in determining the fair values of such securities. If market quotations or prices are not
299 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
readily available or determined to be unreliable, the securities will be valued at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to procedures adopted by the Board. The Funds also use evaluated prices from a pricing service to fair value foreign equity securities in the event that fluctuation in U.S. securities markets exceed a predetermined level or if a foreign market is closed. For valuation purposes, where applicable, quotations of foreign securities in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollar equivalents using the foreign exchange quotation in effect. At September 30, 2016, the Floating Rate Fund held one security that was fair valued at a value of $99,500 representing 0.1% of the Fund’s net assets, the Fund For Income held one security that was fair valued at a value of $273,625 representing 0% of the Fund’s net assets and the Special Situations Fund held one security that was fair valued at a value of $3,683,075 representing 0.7% of the Fund’s net assets.
The Cash Management Fund values its portfolio securities in accordance with the amortized cost method of valuation under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act. Amortized cost is an approximation of market value of an instrument, whereby the difference between its acquisition cost and market value at maturity is amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the instrument. The effect of changes in the market value of a security as a result of fluctuating interest rates is not taken into account and thus the amortized cost method of valuation may result in the value of a security being higher or lower than its actual market value.
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), investments held by the Funds are carried at “fair value”. As defined by ASC 820, fair value is the price that a fund would receive upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market for the investment under current market conditions. Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments.
In addition to defining fair value, ASC 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access.
Level 2—Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include
300 |
quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
Level 3—Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available.
Equity securities traded on an exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy to the extent that they are actively traded and valuation adjustments are not applied. The underlying Funds in which Strategic Income Fund invests are also categorized in Level 1. Foreign securities that are fair valued in the event that fluctuations in U.S. securities markets exceed a predetermined level or if a foreign market is closed are categorized in Level 2. Variable and floating rate, corporate, sovereign and municipal bonds, asset backed, U.S. Government and U.S. Government Agency securities, pass-through certificates and loan participations are categorized in Level 2 to the extent that the inputs are observable and timely, otherwise they would be categorized in Level 3. Short-term notes that are valued at amortized cost by the Cash Management Fund are categorized in Level 2. Foreign exchange contracts that are considered derivative instruments and are valued at the net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on the instruments are categorized in Level 2. Securities that are fair valued by the Valuation Committee may be categorized in either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy depending on the relative significance of the unobservable valuation inputs.
The aggregate value by input level, as of September 30, 2016, for each Fund’s investments is included following each Fund’s portfolio of investments.
B. Federal Income Taxes—No provision has been made for federal income taxes on net income or capital gains since it is the policy of each Fund to continue to comply with the special provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to investment companies, and to make sufficient distributions of income and capital gains (in excess of any available capital loss carryovers) to relieve it from all, or substantially all, such taxes. At September 30, 2016, capital loss carryovers were as follows:
301 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
Capital Loss Carryovers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not Subject | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Capital Loss Carryforwards Expire | to Expiration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long | Short | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Total | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Term | Term | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Floating Rate | $ | 2,912,006 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,132,843 | $ | 779,163 | ||||||||||||||||||
Fund For Income | 155,604,220 | 23,949,720 | 110,622,886 | — | 16,070,123 | 4,961,491 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Government | 14,175,335 | — | — | 40,595 | — | 14,134,740 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
International Opportunities Bond | 461,028 | — | — | — | 269,187 | 191,841 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Grade | 2,682,018 | 2,299,840 | — | — | 382,178 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Limited Duration | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High Quality Bond | 505,114 | — | — | — | 186,747 | 318,367 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strategic Income | 249,919 | — | — | — | 191,783 | 58,136 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Covered Call Strategy | 224,724 | — | — | — | — | 224,724 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global | 2,232,649 | — | — | — | — | 2,232,649 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedged U.S. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Opportunities | 7,734 | — | — | — | 1,078 | 6,656 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
International | 29,410,125 | — | 19,627,323 | 2,191,242 | 2,774,463 | 4,817,097 |
As a result of the passage of the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (“the Modernization Act of 2010”), losses incurred in fiscal year 2010 and beyond retain their character as short-term or long-term, have no expiration date and are utilized prior to capital loss carryovers occurring prior to the enactment of the Modernization Act of 2010.
The Funds recognize the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Funds’ tax positions and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years 2013–2015, or expected to be taken in the Funds’ 2016 tax returns. The Funds identify their major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal, New York State, New York City and foreign jurisdictions where the Funds make significant investments; however, the Funds are not aware of any tax position for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next twelve months.
C. Distributions to Shareholders— Dividends from net investment income of Balanced Income Fund, Floating Rate Fund, Fund For Income, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, and Strategic Income Fund are generally declared daily and paid monthly. The Cash Management Fund declares distributions, if any, daily and pays distributions monthly. Prior to March 31, 2016, dividends from net investment income of International Opportunities Bond Fund were generally declared daily and paid monthly. Effective April 1, 2016, dividends from
302 |
net investment income, if any, of International Opportunities Bond Fund are declared and paid quarterly. Distributions are declared from the total of net investment income plus or minus all realized short-term gains and losses on investments. Dividends from net investment income, if any, of Covered Call Strategy Fund, Equity Income Fund, Growth & Income Fund, Real Estate Fund and Total Return Fund are declared and paid quarterly. Dividends from net investment income, if any, of Global Fund, Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund, International Fund, Opportunity Fund, Select Growth Fund, and Special Situations Fund are declared and paid annually. Distributions from net realized capital gains, if any, of each of the Funds are normally declared and paid annually. Income dividends and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences are primarily due to differing treatments for capital loss carryforwards, deferral of wash sales losses, post-October capital losses, late loss deferrals, net operating losses and foreign currency transactions.
D. Expense Allocation—Expenses directly charged or attributable to a Fund are paid from the assets of that Fund. General expenses of the Trusts are allocated among and charged to the assets of each Fund on a fair and equitable basis, which may be based on the relative assets of each Fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each Fund.
E. Use of Estimates—The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F. Foreign Currency Translations—The accounting records of International Opportunities Bond Fund, Global Fund and International Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Portfolio securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend income and certain expenses are translated to U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions.
International Opportunities Bond Fund, Global Fund, Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund and International Fund do not isolate that portion of gains and losses on investments which is due to changes in foreign exchange rates from that which is due to changes in market prices of the investments. These changes are included with the net realized and unrealized gains and losses from investments.
303 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions include gains and losses from the sales of foreign currency and gains and losses on accrued foreign dividends and related withholding taxes.
G. Other—Security transactions are generally accounted for on the first business day following the date the securities are purchased or sold, except for financial reporting purposes, which is trade date. Investments in securities issued on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are generally reflected in the assets of the Funds on the first business day following the date the securities are purchased and the Funds segregate assets for these transactions. Cost of securities is determined and gains and losses are based on the identified cost basis for both financial statement and federal income tax purposes. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or for certain foreign dividends, as soon as the Fund becomes aware of the dividends. Interest income and estimated expenses are accrued daily. Bond discounts and premiums are accreted or amortized using the interest method. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends have been provided in accordance with the Funds’ understanding of the applicable country’s tax rules and rates. The Bank of New York Mellon serves as custodian for the Funds and may provide credits against custodian charges based on uninvested cash balance of the Funds. For the year ended September 30, 2016, the Income Funds and Equity Funds received credits in the amount of $38,465 and $23,120, respectively. Certain of the Income and Equity Funds reduced expenses through brokerage service arrangements. For the year ended September 30, 2016, expenses were reduced by a total of $75 for certain of the Income Funds and $33,632 for certain of the Equity Funds under these arrangements.
304 |
2. Security Transactions—For the year ended September 30, 2016, purchases and sales of securities and long-term U.S. Government obligations (excluding U.S. Treasury bills, short-term securities and foreign currencies) were as follows:
Long-Term U.S. | ||||||||||||||||
Securities | Government Obligations | |||||||||||||||
Cost of | Proceeds | Cost of | Proceeds | |||||||||||||
Fund | Purchases | of Sales | Purchases | of Sales | ||||||||||||
Balanced Income | $ | 32,731,058 | $ | 6,929,970 | $ | 2,675,481 | $ | 1,796,725 | ||||||||
Floating Rate | 64,490,244 | 45,748,808 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Fund For Income | 374,167,344 | 361,869,035 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Government | 171,981,349 | 184,203,582 | 150,253,747 | 135,672,268 | ||||||||||||
International Opportunities | ||||||||||||||||
Bond | 87,038,744 | 97,902,057 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Investment Grade | 250,609,315 | 207,478,989 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Limited Duration | ||||||||||||||||
High Quality Bond | 92,889,222 | 44,077,089 | 8,085,882 | 8,374,719 | ||||||||||||
Strategic Income | 77,963,432 | 65,321,073 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Covered Call Strategy | 129,808,624 | 42,314,452 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Equity Income | 120,650,157 | 122,162,816 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Global | 479,524,390 | 441,164,431 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Growth & Income | 388,088,094 | 455,298,792 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Hedged U.S. Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Opportunities | 33,107,467 | 1,244,550 | — | — | ||||||||||||
International | 97,193,171 | 75,038,865 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Opportunity | 346,672,947 | 306,034,621 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Real Estate | 42,240,084 | 21,088,814 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Select Growth | 263,747,380 | 248,021,169 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Special Situations | 228,575,919 | 187,518,578 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Total Return | 498,841,908 | 469,162,974 | 25,274,124 | 35,006,181 |
305 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
At September 30, 2016, aggregate cost and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of securities for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Gross | Gross | Net Unrealized | ||||||||||||||
Aggregate | Unrealized | Unrealized | Appreciation | |||||||||||||
Fund | Cost | Appreciation | Depreciation | (Depreciation) | ||||||||||||
Balanced Income | $ | 28,914,581 | $ | 1,204,274 | $ | 186,574 | $ | 1,017,700 | ||||||||
Floating Rate | 134,093,821 | 1,271,911 | 497,471 | 774,440 | ||||||||||||
Fund For Income | 672,696,736 | 23,357,855 | 4,559,861 | 18,797,994 | ||||||||||||
Government | 332,420,655 | 7,690,961 | 962,733 | 6,728,228 | ||||||||||||
International Opportunities | ||||||||||||||||
Bond | 127,199,631 | 2,551,822 | 11,668,970 | (9,117,148) | ||||||||||||
Investment Grade | 572,150,145 | 22,483,972 | 6,551,386 | 15,932,586 | ||||||||||||
Limited Duration | ||||||||||||||||
High Quality Bond | 118,864,898 | 451,595 | 1,628,542 | (1,176,947) | ||||||||||||
Strategic Income | 152,438,599 | 127,612 | 3,824,732 | (3,697,120) | ||||||||||||
Covered Call Strategy | 88,203,664 | 3,147,334 | 1,319,102 | 1,828,232 | ||||||||||||
Equity Income | 435,241,079 | 161,497,150 | 9,668,309 | 151,828,841 | ||||||||||||
Global | 463,349,963 | 60,949,470 | 12,504,775 | 48,444,695 | ||||||||||||
Growth & Income | 1,147,183,308 | 632,989,310 | 29,539,563 | 603,449,747 | ||||||||||||
Hedged U.S. Equity | ||||||||||||||||
Opportunities | 31,867,177 | 584,963 | 481,678 | 103,285 | ||||||||||||
International | 220,667,922 | 75,377,041 | 2,771,786 | 72,605,255 | ||||||||||||
Opportunity | 713,366,489 | 278,082,447 | 26,012,071 | 252,070,376 | ||||||||||||
Real Estate | 76,844,126 | 6,621,591 | 2,900,538 | 3,721,053 | ||||||||||||
Select Growth | 387,070,324 | 68,928,550 | 8,834,996 | 60,093,554 | ||||||||||||
Special Situations | 447,390,776 | 108,808,307 | 14,854,214 | 93,954,093 | ||||||||||||
Total Return | 739,793,485 | 177,340,080 | 10,863,292 | 166,476,788 |
306 |
The Strategic Income Fund may invest in Institutional Class shares of the Cash Management Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Floating Rate Fund, Fund For Income, Covered Call Strategy Fund, Equity Income Fund, Real Estate Fund, Tax Exempt Income Fund and Tax Exempt Opportunities Fund. During the year ended September 30, 2016, purchases and sales of shares, dividends, capital gain distributions received and realized gains (losses) recognized by Strategic Income Fund from investments in these Funds were as follows:
Balance | Balance | Realized | ||||||||||||||
of Shares | of Shares | Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||||||
Held | Purchases/ | Sales/ | Held | Value | Dividend | Capital Gain | on Security | |||||||||
Fund | 9/30/2015 | Additions | Reductions | 9/30/2016 | 9/30/2016 | Income | Distributions | Transactions | ||||||||
Covered Call | ||||||||||||||||
Strategy | — | 363,379 | — | 363,379 | $ 3,760,976 | $ 24,335 | $ — | $ — | ||||||||
Floating Rate | 1,040,007 | 478,165 | (359,718) | 1,158,454 | 11,167,497 | 389,245 | — | 75,541 | ||||||||
Fund For Income | 20,412,467 | 7,806,131 | (4,344,855) | 23,873,743 | 59,445,620 | 2,682,935 | — | (314,488) | ||||||||
Government | 1,239,997 | 420,931 | (977,699) | 683,229 | 7,447,197 | 332,534 | — | 12 | ||||||||
International | ||||||||||||||||
Opportunities Bond | 2,138,577 | 69,864 | (1,378,706) | 829,735 | 7,708,242 | 187,055 | — | (1,595,081) | ||||||||
Investment Grade | 1,383,268 | 1,964,425 | (364,598) | 2,983,095 | 29,592,300 | 786,080 | — | 111,700 | ||||||||
Limited Duration | ||||||||||||||||
High Quality Bond | 676,382 | 1,911,630 | (307,565) | 2,280,447 | 22,120,332 | 473,667 | — | 6,432 | ||||||||
Equity Income | 849,529 | 382,215 | (1,231,744) | — | — | 61,564 | 245,434 | (229,023) | ||||||||
Tax Exempt Income | 690,033 | 412,041 | (1,102,074) | — | — | 325,195 | — | (145,630) | ||||||||
28,430,260 | 13,808,781 | (10,066,959) | 32,172,082 | $141,242,164 | $5,262,610 | $245,434 | $(2,090,537) |
The financial statements of each of the Funds in which Strategic Income had investments during the year ended September 30, 2016 are included in this report except Tax Exempt Income Fund, whose most recent financial statements as of June 30, 2016 are available and can be viewed by visiting our website www.foresters.com, by calling 1-800-423-4026 or by writing to us at the following address: Foresters Financial Services, Inc., 40 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005.
3. Advisory Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates—Certain officers of the Trusts are officers of the Trusts’ investment adviser, FIMCO, their underwriter, Foresters Financial Services, Inc. (“FFS”) and their transfer agent, Foresters Investor Services, Inc. (“FIS”). Trustees of the Trusts who are not officers or directors of FIMCO or its affiliates are remunerated by the Funds. For the year ended September 30, 2016, total trustees fees accrued by the Income Funds and Equity Funds amounted to $118,894 and $317,062, respectively.
307 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
The Investment Advisory Agreements provide as compensation to FIMCO for each Fund, an annual fee, payable monthly, at the following rates:
Cash Management Fund—.50% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO has voluntarily waived the Fund’s entire advisory fee of $596,957 and assumed $214,068 of other Fund expenses to prevent a negative yield on the Fund’s shares.
Balanced Income Fund—.70% on the first $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .65% on the next $200 million, .60% on the next $500 million, .55% on the next $1 billion, declining by .05% on each $1 billion thereafter down to .45% on average daily net assets over $3 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO has assumed, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement, the Fund’s entire advisory fee of $116,985 and assumed $59,583 of other Fund expenses to limit the Fund’s overall expense ratio (exclusive of certain expenses) to 1.15% on Class A shares, .82% on Advisor Class shares and .69% on Institutional Class shares.
Floating Rate Fund—.60% on the first $250 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .55% on the next $250 million, .50% on the next $500 million and .45% on the next $1 billion and .40% on average daily net assets over $2 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO has waived, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement, $161,613 in advisory fees to limit the Fund’s overall expense ratio (exclusive of certain expenses) to 1.10% on Class A shares, .90% on Advisor Class shares and .70% on Institutional Class shares.
Fund For Income and International Opportunities Bond Fund—.75% on the first $250 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, .72% on the next $250 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $2.25 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $157,952 in advisory fees on Fund For Income to limit the advisory fee to .70% of its average daily net assets. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO has assumed, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement, which has since expired, $20,883 of expenses to limit the International Opportunities Bond Fund’s overall expense ratio (exclusive of certain expenses) to 1.30% on Class A shares.
Government, Investment Grade, and Limited Duration High Quality Bond—.66% on the first $500 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $366,801, in advisory fees on Government Fund to limit the advisory fee to .55% of its
308 |
average daily net assets. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $605,056 in advisory fees on Investment Grade Fund to limit the advisory fee to .55% of its average daily net assets. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO has waived, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement, $224,275 in advisory fees to limit the Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund’s overall expense ratio (exclusive of certain expenses) to 1.05% on Class A shares, .75% on Advisor Class shares and .60% on Institutional Class shares
Strategic Income Fund—.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Covered Call Strategy Fund—.80% on the first $300 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, .75% on the next $200 million, .70% on the next $500 million, declining by .05% on each $1 billion thereafter, down to .55% on average daily net assets of $3 billion. For the period, April 1, 2016 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016, FIMCO has waived, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement $130,501 in advisory fees to limit the Covered Call Strategy Fund’s overall expense ratio (exclusive of certain expenses) to 1.30% on Class A shares, .97% on Advisor Class shares and .84% on Institutional Class shares.
Equity Income, Growth & Income, Real Estate, Opportunity and Select Growth Funds—.75% on the first $300 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, .72% on the next $200 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $2.25 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO has waived, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement $61,030 in advisory fees to limit the Real Estate Fund’s overall expense ratio (exclusive of certain expenses) to 1.45% on Class A shares, 1.12% on Advisor Class shares and 1.00% on Institutional Class shares.
Global Fund—.95% on the first $600 million, .92% on the next $400 million, .90% on the next $500 million and .88% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $241,466 in advisory fees to limit the advisory fee to .90% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund—1.15% on the first $100 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, 1.10% on the next $400 million, 1.05% on the next $500 million, declining by .05% on each $1 billion thereafter, down to .90% on average daily net assets of $3 billion. For the period, August 1, 2016 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016, FIMCO has assumed, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement, the Fund’s entire advisory fee of $33,039 and assumed $26,216 of other Fund expenses to limit the Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund’s overall expense ratio (exclusive of certain expenses) to 1.75% on Class A shares, 1.42% on Advisor Class shares and 1.31% on Institutional Class shares.
309 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
International Fund—.98% on the first $300 million of the Fund��s average daily net assets, .95% on the next $300 million, .92% on the next $400 million, .90% on the next $500 million and .88% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion.
Special Situations Fund—.90% on the first $200 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .75% on the next $300 million, .72% on the next $250 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million and .64% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $49,241 advisory fees to limit the advisory fee to .80% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Total Return Fund—.75% on the first $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .70% on the next $200 million, .65% on the next $500 million, .60% on the next $1 billion, .55% on the next $1 billion, down to .50% on average daily net assets over $3 billion.
For the year ended September 30, 2016, total advisory fees accrued to FIMCO by the Income Funds and Equity Funds were $13,925,509 and $43,762,776, respectively, of which $2,229,639 and $515,277, respectively, was voluntarily waived by FIMCO as noted above.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the Balanced Income Fund (“BIF”) to limit BIF’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.15% of the average daily net assets on the Class A shares, .82% of the average daily net assets on Advisor Class shares and .69% of the average daily net assets on Institutional Class shares. The agreement expires on January 31, 2017. FIMCO and BIF have agreed that any expenses of BIF assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by BIF within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of BIF’s Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares to exceed the applicable expense ratio in place at the time the expenses are waived or assumed. For the period October 1, 2015 (commencement of operations) through September 30, 2016, FIMCO assumed $176,568 under the terms of the agreement of which $176,568 expires on September 30, 2019. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended prior to January 31, 2017, with the approval of the Board.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the Floating Rate Fund (“FRF”) to limit FRF’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest
310 |
expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.10% of the average daily net assets on the Class A shares, .90% of the average daily net assets on Advisor Class shares and .70% of the average daily net assets on Institutional Class shares. The agreement expires on January 31, 2017. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO assumed $161,613, under the terms of the agreement. FIMCO and FRF have agreed that any expenses of FRF assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by FRF within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of FRF’s Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares to exceed the applicable expense ratio in place at the time the expenses are waived or assumed. For the period October 21, 2013 (commencement of operations) through September 30, 2016, FIMCO assumed $583,579 under the terms of the agreement of which $223,535 expires on September 30, 2017, $198,431 expires on September 30, 2018 and $161,613 expires on September 30, 2019. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended prior to January 31, 2017, with the approval of the Board.
FIMCO had entered into an expense limitation agreement with the International Opportunities Bond Fund (“IOBF”) to limit IOBF’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.30% of the average daily net assets on the Class A shares. The agreement expired on January 31, 2016. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO assumed $20,883 under the terms of the agreement. FIMCO and IOBF have agreed that any expenses of IOBF assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by IOBF within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of IOBF’s Class A shares to exceed the applicable expense ratio in place at the time the expenses are waived or assumed. For the period August 20, 2012 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016, FIMCO assumed $684,479 under the terms of the agreement of which $278,248 expired on September 30, 2015, $228,243 expired on September 30, 2016, $94,746 expires on September 30, 2017, $62,359 expires on September 30, 2018, and $20,883 expires on September 30, 2019.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund (“LDHQ”) to limit LDHQ’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.05% of the average daily net assets on Class A
311 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
shares, .75% of the average daily net assets on Advisor Class shares and .60% of the average daily net assets on Institutional Class shares. The agreement expires on January 31, 2017. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO assumed $224,275, under the terms of the agreement. FIMCO and LDHQ have agreed that any expenses of LDHQ assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by LDHQ within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of LDHQ’s Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares to exceed the applicable expense ratio in place at the time the expenses are waived or assumed. For the period May 19, 2014 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016, FIMCO assumed $546,563 under the terms of the agreement of which $143,148 expires on September 30, 2017, $179,140 expires on September 30, 2018 and $224,275 expires on September 30, 2019. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended prior to January 31, 2017, with the approval of the Board.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the Covered Call Strategy Fund (“CCS”) to limit CCS’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.30% of the average daily net assets on the Class A shares, .97% of the average daily net assets on Advisor Class shares and .84% of the average daily net assets on Institutional Class shares. The agreement expires on January 31, 2018. FIMCO and CCS have agreed that any expenses of CCS assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by CCS within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of CCS’s Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares to exceed the applicable expense ratio in place at the time the expenses are waived or assumed. For the period April 1, 2016 (commencement of operations) through September 30, 2016, FIMCO assumed $130,501 under the terms of the agreement of which $130,501 expires on September 30, 2019. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended prior to January 31, 2018, with the approval of the Board.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (“HEUSO”) to limit HEUSO’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.75% of the average daily net assets on the Class A shares, 1.42% of the average daily net assets on Advisor Class shares and 1.31% of the average daily net assets on Institutional Class shares. The agreement expires
312 |
on August 1, 2017. FIMCO and HEUSO have agreed that any expenses of HEUSO assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by HEUSO within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of HEUSO’s Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares to exceed the applicable expense ratio in place at the time the expenses are waived or assumed. For the period August 1, 2016 (commencement of operations) through September 30, 2016, FIMCO assumed $59,255 under the terms of the agreement of which $59,255 expires on September 30, 2019. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended prior to August 1, 2017, with the approval of the Board.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the Real Estate Fund (“REIT”) to limit REIT’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.45% of the average daily net assets on the Class A shares, 1.12% of the average daily net assets on Advisor Class shares and 1.00% of the average daily net assets on Institutional Class shares. The agreement expires on January 31, 2017. For the year ended September 30, 2016, FIMCO assumed $61,030, under the terms of the agreement. FIMCO and REIT have agreed that any expenses of REIT assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by REIT within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of REIT’s Class A shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares to exceed the applicable expense ratio in place at the time the expenses are waived or assumed. For the period April 6, 2015 (commencement of operations) through September 30, 2016, FIMCO assumed $167,307 under the terms of the agreement of which $106,277 expires on September 30, 2018 and $61,030 expires on September 30, 2019. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended prior to January 31, 2017, with the approval of the Board.
For the year ended September 30, 2016, FFS, as underwriter, received from the Income Funds and Equity Funds $10,444,834 and $22,549,009, respectively, in commissions in connection with the sale of shares of the Funds, after allowing $168,782 and $116,950, respectively, to other dealers. For the year ended September 30, 2016, shareholder servicing costs for the Income Funds and Equity Funds included $3,074,177 and $8,004,495, respectively, in transfer agent fees accrued to FIS, of which FIS voluntarily waived $43,983 on the Cash Management Fund and $20,883 on the International Opportunities Bond Fund.
Pursuant to Distribution Plans adopted under Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, each Fund, other than the Cash Management Fund, is authorized to pay FFS a fee up to .30% of
313 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
the average daily net assets of the Class A shares and 1% of the average daily net assets of the Class B shares on an annualized basis each fiscal year, payable monthly. The Cash Management Fund is authorized to pay FFS a fee up to 1% of the average daily net assets of the Class B shares. The fee consists of a distribution fee and a service fee. The service fee is paid for the ongoing servicing of clients who are shareholders of that Fund. For the year ended September 30, 2016, total distribution plan fees accrued to FFS by the Income Funds and Equity Funds amounted to $4,905,397 and $15,837,797, respectively.
Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC, serves as investment subadviser to International Opportunities Bond Fund. Muzinich & Co., Inc., serves as investment subadviser to Floating Rate Fund and Fund For Income. Wellington Management Company, LLP serves as investment subadviser to Global Fund and, effective August 1, 2016, (commencement of operations) Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund. Smith Asset Management Group, L.P. serves as investment subadviser to Select Growth Fund. Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. serves as investment subadviser to International Fund. Effective April 1, 2016, (commencement of operations) Ziegler Capital Management, LLC serves as investment subadviser to Covered Call Strategy Fund. The subadvisers are paid by FIMCO and not by the Funds.
4. Restricted Securities—Certain restricted securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 and may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. Unless otherwise noted, these 144A securities are deemed to be liquid. At September 30, 2016, the Balanced Income Fund held two 144A Securities with an aggregate value of $485,215 representing 1.6% of the Fund’s net assets, Floating Rate Fund held five 144A securities with an aggregate value of $1,842,296 representing 1.4% of the Fund’s net assets, Fund For Income held one hundred sixty-nine 144A securities with an aggregate value of $277,835,263 representing 39.4% of the Fund’s net assets, International Opportunities Bond Fund held seven 144A securities with an aggregate value of $7,598,489 representing 6.1% of the Fund’s net assets, Investment Grade Fund held eighteen 144A securities with an aggregate value of $65,419,322 representing 11.0% of the Fund’s net assets, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund held sixteen 144A securities with an aggregate value of $14,104,487 representing 11.6% of the Fund’s net assets and Total Return Fund held eighteen 144A securities with an aggregate value of $22,517,515 representing 2.5% of the Fund’s net assets. Certain restricted securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and may only be sold to qualified investors. Unless otherwise noted, the Section 4(2) securities are deemed to be liquid. At September 30, 2016, Total Return Fund held two Section 4(2) securities with
314 |
an aggregate value of $9,994,116 representing 1.1% of the Fund’s net assets. These securities are valued as set forth in Note 1A.
5. Derivatives—Some of the Funds may invest in various derivatives. A derivative is a financial instrument which has a value that is based on – or “derived from” – the values of other assets, reference rates, or indices. The Funds may invest in derivatives for hedging purposes.
Derivatives may relate to a wide variety of underlying references, such as commodities, stocks, bonds, interest rates, currency exchange rates, and related indices. Derivatives include futures contracts and options on futures contracts, forward-commitment transactions, options on securities, caps, floors, collars, swap contracts, and other financial instruments. Some derivatives, such as futures contracts and certain options, are traded on U.S. commodity and securities exchanges, while other derivatives, such as swap contracts, are privately negotiated and entered into in the OTC. The risks associated with the use of derivatives are different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments.
The use of a derivative involves the risk that a loss may be sustained as a result of the insolvency or bankruptcy of the other party to the contract (usually referred to as a “counterparty”) or the failure of the counterparty to make required payments or otherwise comply with the terms of the contract. Additionally, the use of credit derivatives can result in losses if the Adviser does not correctly evaluate the creditworthiness of the issuer on which the credit derivative is based.
Derivatives may be subject to liquidity risk, which exists when a particular derivative is difficult to purchase or sell. If a derivative transaction is particularly large or if the relevant market is illiquid (as is the case with many OTC derivatives), it may not be possible to initiate a transaction or liquidate a position at an advantageous time or price.
Derivatives may be subject to pricing or “basis” risk, which exists when a particular derivative becomes extraordinarily expensive relative to historical prices or the prices of corresponding cash market instruments. Under certain market conditions, it may not be economically feasible to initiate a transaction or liquidate a position in time to avoid a loss or take advantage of an opportunity.
Because many derivatives have leverage or borrowing components, adverse changes in the value or level of the underlying asset, reference rate, or index can result in a loss substantially greater than the amount invested in the derivative itself. Certain derivatives have the potential for unlimited loss, regardless of the size of the initial investment.
315 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
Like most other investments, derivative instruments are subject to the risk that the market value of the instrument will change in a way detrimental to the Funds’ interest. The Funds bear the risk that the Adviser will incorrectly forecast future market trends or the values of assets, reference rates, indices, or other financial or economic factors in establishing derivative positions for the Funds. If the Adviser attempts to use a derivative as a hedge against, or as a substitute for, a portfolio investment, the Funds will be exposed to the risk that the derivative will have or will develop an imperfect or no correlation with the portfolio investment. This could cause substantial losses for the Funds. While hedging strategies involving derivative instruments can reduce the risk of loss, they can also reduce the opportunity for gain or even result in losses by offsetting favorable price movements in other investments. Many derivatives, in particular OTC derivatives, are complex and often valued subjectively. Improper valuations can result in increased cash payment requirements to counterparties or a loss of value to the Funds.
The following provides more information on specific types of derivatives and activity in the Funds. The use of derivative instruments by the Funds for the period ended September 30, 2016 was related to the use of written options.
Options Contracts—Some of the Funds may write covered call and put options on securities, derivative instruments, or currencies the Funds own or in which it may invest. Writing put options tends to increase the Funds’ exposure to the underlying instrument. Writing call options tends to decrease the Funds’ exposure to the underlying instrument. When a Fund writes a call or put option, an amount equal to the premium received is recorded as a liability and subsequently marked to market to reflect the current value of the option written. These liabilities are reflected as written options outstanding in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Payments received or made, if any, from writing options with premiums to be determined on a future date are reflected as such on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums received from writing options which expire are treated as realized gains. Premiums received from writing options which are exercised or closed are added to the proceeds or offset against amounts paid on the underlying future, swap, security or currency transaction to determine the realized gain or loss. A Fund, as a writer of an option, has no control over whether the underlying future, swap, security or currency may be sold (call) or purchased (put) and, as a result, bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the future, swap, security or currency underlying the written option. The risk exists that the Funds may not be able to enter into a closing transaction because of an illiquid market.
Some of the Funds may also purchase put and call options. Purchasing call options tends to increase a Fund’s exposure to the underlying instrument. Purchasing put options tends to decrease a Fund’s exposure to the underlying instrument. A Fund pays a premium which is included in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities as an investment
316 |
and subsequently marked to market to reflect the current value of the option. Premiums paid for purchasing options which expire are treated as realized losses. The risk associated with purchasing put and call options is limited to the premium paid. Premiums paid for purchasing options which are exercised or closed are added to the amounts paid or offset against the proceeds on the underlying future, swap, security or currency transaction to determine the realized gain or loss.
The premium amount and the number of option contracts written by the Funds during the year ended September 30, 2016, were as follows:
Hedged U.S. Equity | ||||||||||||||||||
Covered Call Strategy* | Equity Income | Opportunities** | ||||||||||||||||
Number of | Premium | Number of | Premium | Number of | Premium | |||||||||||||
Contracts | Amount | Contracts | Amount | Contracts | Amount | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding at | ||||||||||||||||||
beginning of period | — | $ — | — | $ — | — | $ — | ||||||||||||
Call options written | (36,791) | (5,641,308) | (2,252) | (155,094) | — | — | ||||||||||||
Put options written | — | — | — | — | (34) | (89,006) | ||||||||||||
Put options purchased | — | — | — | — | 45 | 237,357 | ||||||||||||
Options exercised | 505 | 72,553 | 501 | 32,925 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Option purchased to cover | 20,510 | 3,252,802 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Option expirations | 1,862 | 165,266 | 1,751 | 122,169 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2016 | (13,914) | $(2,150,687) | — | $ — | 11 | $148,351 |
* From May 2, 2016 (commencement of operations)
** From August 1, 2016 (commencement of operations)
Derivative Investment Holdings Categorized by Risk Exposure—The following table sets forth the fair value and the location in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities of the Funds’ derivative contracts by primary risk exposure as of September 30, 2016:
Liability Derivatives | ||||||||||
Statements of Assets | ||||||||||
Risk exposure category | and Liabilities Location | Value | ||||||||
Equity Contracts: | ||||||||||
Covered Call Strategy | Written options, at value | $(2,065,788) | ||||||||
Hedged U.S. Equity | ||||||||||
Opportunities | Written options, at value | $ (75,817) |
317 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
The following table sets forth the Funds’ realized gain (loss), as reflected in the Statement of Operations, by primary risk exposure and by type of derivative contract for the year ended September 30, 2016:
Risk exposure category | Written options | |||||||
Equity Contracts: | ||||||||
Covered Call Strategy | $ | (934,217) | ||||||
Equity Income | $ | 122,170 |
The following table sets forth the Funds’ change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) by primary risk exposure and by type of derivative contract for the year ended September 30, 2016:
Hedged | ||||||||||
Covered Call | U.S. Equity | |||||||||
Risk exposure category | Strategy | Opportunities | ||||||||
Option contracts | $84,899 | $(55,107) |
Interest Rate Futures Contracts—The Funds may enter into interest rate futures contracts on U.S. Treasury obligations and options thereon that are traded on a U.S. exchange. An interest rate futures contract provides for the future sale by one party and the purchase by another party of a specified amount of a particular financial instrument (debt security) at a specified price, date, time and place. Such investments may be used for, among other purposes, the purpose of hedging against changes in the value of a Fund’s portfolio securities due to anticipated changes in interest rates and market conditions. A public market exists for interest rate futures contracts covering a number of debt securities, including long-term U.S. Treasury Bonds, 10-year U.S. Treasury Notes and three-month U.S. Treasury Bills. No price is paid upon entering into futures contracts. Instead, upon entering into a futures contract, the Funds are required to deposit with their custodian in a segregated account in the name of the futures broker through which the transaction is effected an amount of cash or U.S. Government securities generally equal to 3%-5% or less of the contract value. This amount is known as “initial margin.”
318 |
An option on an interest rate futures contract generally gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in a futures contract at a specified exercise price at any time prior to the expiration date of the option. The Funds may purchase put and call options on interest rate futures contracts on U.S. Treasury obligations which are traded on a U.S. exchange as a hedge against changes in interest rates, and may enter into closing transactions with respect to such options to terminate existing positions. There is no guarantee such closing transactions can be effected. When writing a call or put option on a futures contract, margin also must be deposited in accordance with applicable exchange rules. Initial margin on futures contracts is in the nature of a performance bond or good-faith deposit that is returned to a Fund upon termination of the transaction, assuming all obligations have been satisfied. Under certain circumstances, such as periods of high volatility, a Fund may be required by an exchange to increase the level of its initial margin payment. Subsequent payments, called “variation margin,” to and from the broker, are made on a daily basis as the value of the futures position varies, a process known as “marking to market.” Variation margin does not involve borrowing to finance the futures transactions, but rather represents a daily settlement of a Fund’s obligation to or from a clearing organization. A Fund is also obligated to make initial and variation margin payments when it writes options on futures contracts.
To the extent that a Fund participates in the futures or options markets, it will incur investment risks and transaction costs to which it would not be subject absent the use of these strategies. The use of these strategies involves certain special risks, including: (1) dependence on the ability of the Funds’ investment adviser, FIMCO to predict correctly movements in the direction of interest rates and securities prices; (2) imperfect correlation between the price of futures contracts and options thereon and movements in the prices of the securities or currencies being hedged; (3) the fact that skills needed to use these strategies are different from those needed to select portfolio securities; (4) the leverage (if any) that is created by investing in the option or futures contract; and (5) the possible absence of a liquid secondary market for any particular instrument at any time. If FIMCO’s prediction of movements in the direction of the securities and interest rate markets is inaccurate, the adverse consequences to that Fund may leave it in a worse position than if such strategies were not used. Derivatives may be difficult to sell, unwind or value.
319 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
The following table summarizes the value of the Funds’ interest rate futures contracts held as of September 30, 2016, and the related location in the accompanying Statement of Operations.
Statement of | |||||||
Operations Location | |||||||
Unrealized appreciation | |||||||
(depreciation) in value | |||||||
Interest Rate Futures | of investments | ||||||
Balanced Income | $ | 14,211 | |||||
Hedged U.S. Equity | |||||||
Opportunities | $ | (87,577) |
The amount of realized gains and losses on interest rate futures contracts recognized by the Funds in the accompanying Statement of Operations for the year ended September 30, 2016 are summarized in the following table:
Statement of Operations | |||||||
Interest Rate | |||||||
Realized Gain (Loss) | Futures Contracts | ||||||
Balanced Income | $ | 3,472 | |||||
Hedged U.S. Equity | |||||||
Opportunities | $ | (1,796) |
Foreign Exchange Contracts—The International Opportunities Bond Fund may enter into foreign exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of foreign currencies at negotiated rates at future dates. These contracts are considered derivative instruments and the Fund may invest in them in order to hedge its currency exposure in bond positions or to gain currency exposure held by the Fund. The Fund could be exposed to risk if counterparties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts or if the value of the foreign currency changes unfavorably. Foreign exchange contracts are “marked-to-market” daily at the applicable translation rate and the resulting unrealized gains and losses are reflected in the Fund’s assets. During the period, the Fund used currency forwards to hedge currency exposure from certain bonds as well as to gain currency exposure in certain countries.
320 |
The International Opportunities Bond Fund had the following foreign exchange contracts open at September 30, 2016:
Unrealized | |||||||||||||
Settlement | Foreign | Receive | Appreciation | ||||||||||
Counterparty | Date | Currency | (Deliver) | Asset | Liability | (Depreciation) | |||||||
HSBC | 10/14/16 | NOK | 46,000,000 | $5,753,884 | $5,434,622 | $319,262 | |||||||
HSBC | 10/20/16 | SEK | 19,300,000 | 2,249,732 | 2,252,962 | (3,230) | |||||||
HSBC | 10/21/16 | CLP | 662,000,000 | 1,006,653 | 973,644 | 33,009 | |||||||
HSBC | 10/21/16 | CLP | (662,000,000) | (1,007,827) | (1,006,563) | 1,174 | |||||||
HSBC | 11/7/16 | CLP | 1,335,000,000 | 2,030,032 | 1,952,125 | 77,907 | |||||||
SSB | 11/10/16 | EUR | 7,970,000 | 8,953,145 | 8,853,714 | 99,431 | |||||||
HSBC | 11/10/16 | EUR | (1,310,000) | (1,468,661) | (1,471,596) | (2,935) | |||||||
SSB | 11/10/16 | EUR | (5,480,000) | (6,197,677) | (6,155,989) | 41,688 | |||||||
HSBC | 11/14/16 | NOK | 22,900,000 | 2,864,433 | 2,791,634 | 72,799 | |||||||
MSD | 11/16/16 | NZD | (6,310,000) | (4,557,902) | (4,594,638) | (36,736) | |||||||
HSBC | 11/16/16 | NZD | 1,240,000 | 902,908 | 904,418 | (1,510) | |||||||
MSD | 11/18/16 | AUD | 4,510,000 | 3,451,733 | 3,447,151 | 4,582 | |||||||
HSBC | 11/18/16 | CLP | 2,703,000,000 | 4,110,245 | 4,073,700 | 36,545 | |||||||
HSBC | 12/5/16 | SEK | 50,700,000 | 5,909,917 | 6,043,628 | (133,711) | |||||||
SSB | 12/9/16 | GBP | 4,780,000 | 6,195,562 | 6,346,358 | (150,796) | |||||||
BCI | 12/21/16 | INR | 290,000,000 | 4,355,662 | 4,278,296 | 77,366 | |||||||
Net Unrealized gain on open foreign exchange contracts | $434,845 |
A summary of abbreviations for foreign currency appears at the end of the International Opportunities Bond Fund’s portfolio of investments.
Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities—Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The guidance requires retrospective application for all comparative periods presented.
A Fund may mitigate credit risk with respect to OTC derivative counterparties through credit support annexes included with an International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. Master Agreements or other Master Netting Agreements which are the standard contracts governing most derivative transactions between the Fund and each of its counterparties. These agreements may allow the Fund and each counterparty to offset certain derivative financial instruments’ payables and/or receivables against each other and/or with collateral, which is generally held by the Fund’s custodian. The amount of collateral moved to/from applicable counterparties is based upon minimum transfer amounts specified in the agreement. To the extent amounts due to the Fund from its
321 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
counterparties are not fully collateralized contractually or otherwise, the Fund bears the risk of loss from counterparty non-performance.
The International Opportunities Bond Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities (“SOAL”) presents financial instruments on a gross basis, therefore there are no net amounts and no offset amounts within the SOAL to present below. Gross amounts of the financial instruments, amounts related to financial instruments/cash collateral not offset in the SOAL and net amounts are presented below:
Description/Financial | Gross Amounts | ||||||||||||||||
Instrument/Statement | Presented in | ||||||||||||||||
of Assets and Liabilities | Statement of Assets | Financial | |||||||||||||||
Category | Counterparty | and Liabilities | Instruments* | Net Amount | |||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on foreign | |||||||||||||||||
exchange contracts | BCI | $ 77,366 | $ — | $ 77,366 | |||||||||||||
HSBC | 540,696 | (141,386) | 399,310 | ||||||||||||||
MSD | 4,582 | (36,736) | (32,154) | ||||||||||||||
SSB | 141,119 | (150,796) | (9,677) | ||||||||||||||
Total | $763,763 | $(328,918) | $434,845 | ||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on foreign | |||||||||||||||||
exchange contracts | HSBC | $141,386 | $(141,386) | $ — | |||||||||||||
MSD | 36,736 | (36,736) | — | ||||||||||||||
SSB | 150,796 | (150,796) | — | ||||||||||||||
Total | $328,918 | $(328,918) | $ — |
*Amounts related to master netting arrangements (for example, ISDA) which have been determined by the Fund to be legally enforceable in the event of default and where certain other criteria are met in accordance with applicable offsetting accounting guidance.
During the year ended September 30, 2016, the volume of derivative activity for the International Opportunities Bond Fund based on average monthly market values was $18,250,024 for forward foreign currency contracts (to buy) and $18,319,574 for forward foreign currency contracts (to sell).
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments—The fair value of derivative instruments on the International Opportunities Bond Fund as of September 30, 2016, was as follows:
Assets Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | ||||||||
Derivatives not accounted for | |||||||||
as hedging instruments under | Statements of Assets | Statements of Assets | |||||||
ASC 815 | and Liabilities Location | Value | and Liabilities Location | Value | |||||
Foreign exchange contracts: | Unrealized appreciation | Unrealized depreciation | |||||||
of foreign exchange | of foreign exchange | ||||||||
contracts | $763,763 | contracts | $(328,918) |
322 |
The effect of International Opportunities Bond Fund’s derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations are as follows:
Amount of Realized Gain or Loss Recognized on Derivatives | |||
Derivatives not accounted | Net Realized Gain | ||
for as hedging instruments | on Foreign Exchange | ||
under ASC 815 | Transactions | ||
Foreign exchange transactions | |||
International Opportunities Bond Fund | $1,267,704 |
Amount of Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation Recognized on Derivatives | |||
Derivatives not accounted | Net Unrealized Appreciation | ||
for as hedging instruments | on Foreign Exchange | ||
under ASC 815 | Transactions | ||
Foreign exchange transactions | |||
International Opportunities Bond Fund | $293,520 |
6. High Yield Credit Risk—The investments of Floating Rate Fund and Fund For Income in high yield securities, whether rated or unrated, may be considered speculative and subject to greater market fluctuations and risks of loss of income and principal than lower-yielding, higher-rated, fixed-income securities. The risk of loss due to default by the issuer may be significantly greater for holders of high-yielding securities, because such securities are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors of the issuer.
7. Capital—The Trusts are authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest without par value. The Trusts consist of the Funds listed on the cover page, each of which is a separate and distinct series of the Trusts. Each Fund has designated four classes of shares, Class A, Class B, Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares (each, a “Class”) except for Cash Management Fund which has designated only Class A, Class B and Institutional Class shares, Strategic Income Fund which has designated only Class A and Advisor Class shares and Balanced Income Fund, Floating Rate Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, and Real Estate Fund which have designated only Class A, Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares. Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares became available for sale to the public in May 2013 and October 2013, respectively. Not all classes of shares of each Fund may be available in all jurisdictions. Each share of each Class has an equal beneficial interest in the assets, has identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and is subject to the same terms and conditions except that expenses allocated to a Class may be borne solely by that Class as determined by the Board and a Class may have exclusive voting rights with respect to matters affecting
323 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
only that Class. Cash Management Fund’s Class A, Class B and Institutional Class shares are sold without an initial sales charge; however, its Class B shares may only be acquired through an exchange of Class B shares from another First Investors eligible Fund or through the reinvestment of dividends on Class B shares and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge at the rate of 4% in the first year and declining to 0% over a six-year period, which is payable to FFS as underwriter of the Trusts. The shares sold by the other Funds have a public offering price that reflects different sales charges and expense levels. Class A shares are sold with an initial sales charge of up to 5.75% of the amount invested and together with the Class B shares are subject to distribution plan fees as described in Note 3. Class B shares are sold without an initial sales charge, but are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge which declines in steps from 4% to 0% over a six-year period. Class B shares automatically convert into Class A shares after eight years. There are no sales charges associated with the purchase of Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares. Realized and unrealized gains or losses, investment income and expenses (other than distribution plan fees and shareholder servicing costs) are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the relative proportion of net assets to each class.
8. Litigation—The Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds have been named, and have received notice that they may be putative members of the proposed defendant class of shareholders, in a lawsuit filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on November 1, 2010, by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tribune Company (the “Committee”). The Committee is seeking to recover all payments made to beneficial owners of common stock in connection with a leveraged buyout of the Tribune Company (“LBO”), including payments made in connection with a 2007 tender offer into which the Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds tendered their shares of common stock of the Tribune Company. On December 9, 2011, the Blue Chip Fund was reorganized into the Growth & Income Fund pursuant to a Plan of Reorganization and Termination, whereby all of the assets of the Blue Chip Fund were transferred to the Growth & Income Fund, the Growth & Income Fund assumed all of the liabilities of the Blue Chip Fund, including any contingent liabilities with respect to pending or threatened litigation or actions, and shareholders of Blue Chip Fund became shareholders of Growth & Income Fund. The adversary proceeding brought by the Committee has been transferred to the Southern District of New York and administratively consolidated with other similar suits as discussed below. In addition, on June 2, 2011, the Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds were named as defendants in a lawsuit
324 |
brought in connection with the Tribune Company’s LBO by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for a certain series of Senior Notes, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for a certain series of Senior Notes, and Wilmington Trust Company, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for the PHONES Notes (together, the “Bondholder Plaintiffs”) in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. The Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds have also been named in a similar suit filed on behalf of participants in Tribune defined-compensation plans (the “Retiree Plaintiffs”). As with the Bondholder Plaintiffs and the Committee, the Retiree Plaintiffs seek to recover payments of the proceeds of the LBO. (All of these suits have been removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and administratively consolidated with other substantially similar suits against other former Tribune shareholders (the “MDL Proceeding”)). On September 23, 2013, the Judge in the MDL Proceeding dismissed various state law constructive fraudulent transfer suits, resulting in the Funds being dismissed from the Bondholder and Retiree Plaintiffs’ actions. On September 30, 2013, counsel for the plaintiffs in those suits appealed the MDL Judge’s dismissal ruling to the Second Circuit. On March 24, 2016, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the MDL Judge’s dismissal of the various state law constructive fraudulent transfer suits. Absent a reversal by the full Second Circuit or the U.S. Supreme Court, that lawsuit is now ended. The Committee lawsuit alleging a single claim for international fraudulent transfer remains, although motion to dismiss that lawsuit is pending before the District Court. The extent of the Funds’ potential liability in any such actions has not been determined. The Funds have been advised by counsel that the Funds could be held liable to return all or part of the proceeds received in any of these actions, as well as interest and court costs, even though the Funds had no knowledge of, or participation in, any misconduct. The Equity Income Fund received proceeds of $1,526,566 in connection with the LBO, representing 0.26% of its net assets as of September 30, 2016. The Blue Chip Fund received proceeds of $790,772 in connection with the LBO, representing 0.05% of the net assets of Growth & Income Fund as of September 30, 2016. The Equity Income and Growth & Income Funds cannot predict the outcomes of these proceedings, and thus have not accrued any of the amounts sought in the various actions in the accompanying financial statements.
325 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
9. Tax Components of Capital and Distributions to Shareholder —The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 were as follows:
Year Ended September 30, 2016 | Year Ended September 30, 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions | Distributions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declared from | Declared from | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term | Long-Term | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary | Capital | Return of | Ordinary | Capital | Return of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Income | Gain | Capital | Total | Income | Gain | Capital | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balanced Income | $ | 256,699 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 256,699 | $ | N/A | $ | N/A | $ | N/A | $ | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Floating Rate | 3,850,855 | — | — | 3,850,855 | 3,242,239 | — | — | 3,242,239 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund For Income | 33,924,030 | — | — | 33,924,030 | 36,222,935 | — | — | 36,222,935 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Government | 6,703,798 | — | — | 6,703,798 | 7,585,281 | — | — | 7,585,281 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
International | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opportunities Bond | 1,839,254 | — | 184,955 | 2,024,209 | 3,070,013 | — | 1,129,578 | 4,199,591 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Grade | 20,874,776 | — | — | 20,874,776 | 22,126,518 | — | — | 22,126,518 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Limited Duration | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
High Quality Bond | 2,476,438 | — | — | 2,476,438 | 1,224,591 | — | — | 1,224,591 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Strategic Income | 4,986,288 | — | — | 4,986,288 | 4,655,015 | 412,161 | — | 5,067,176 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Covered Call Strategy | 377,599 | — | — | 377,599 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity Income | 9,795,330 | 21,247,896 | — | 31,043,226 | 12,187,459 | 22,266,829 | — | 34,454,288 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global | 309,884 | 25,309,767 | — | 25,619,651 | 14,285,060 | 57,664,927 | — | 71,949,987 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Growth & Income | 19,699,502 | 76,706,713 | — | 96,406,215 | 25,018,848 | 72,478,901 | — | 97,497,749 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedged U.S. Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opportunities | — | — | — | — | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
International | 1,142,967 | — | — | 1,142,967 | 871,047 | — | — | 871,047 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opportunity | 2,323,990 | 74,013,118 | — | 76,337,108 | 9,995,954 | 48,441,364 | — | 58,437,318 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate | 1,508,321 | 102,056 | — | 1,610,377 | 386,739 | — | — | 386,739 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Select Growth | 787,755 | 40,342,995 | — | 41,130,750 | 61,714 | — | — | 61,714 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special Situations | 392,819 | 27,875,860 | — | 28,268,679 | 3,162,126 | 22,590,463 | — | 25,752,589 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Return | 13,557,014 | 18,711,846 | — | 32,268,860 | 15,245,813 | 23,603,377 | — | 38,849,190 |
326 |
As of September 30, 2016, the components of distributable earnings (deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undistributed | Undistributed | Capital | Other | Unrealized | Distributable | |||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary | Capital | Losses | Accumulated | Appreciation | Earnings | |||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Income | Gains | Carryover | Losses* | (Depreciation) | (Deficit)** | ||||||||||||||||||
Balanced Income | $ | 87,712 | $ | 2,083 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,031,910 | †† | $ | 1,121,705 | |||||||||||
Floating Rate | 289,397 | — | (2,912,006) | (1,287,785) | 774,440 | (3,135,954) | ||||||||||||||||||
Fund For Income | 782,190 | — | (155,604,220) | (29,562,163) | 18,797,994 | (165,586,199) | ||||||||||||||||||
Government | 2,612 | — | (14,175,335) | (64,753) | 6,728,228 | (7,509,248) | ||||||||||||||||||
International | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opportunities Bond | — | — | (461,028) | (3,027,699) | (9,119,212) | † | (12,607,939) | |||||||||||||||||
Investment Grade | 32,133 | — | (2,682,018) | (661,436) | 15,932,586 | 12,621,265 | ||||||||||||||||||
Limited Duration High | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quality Bond | 38,048 | — | (505,114) | (203,525) | (1,176,947) | (1,847,538) | ||||||||||||||||||
Strategic Income | 46,788 | — | (249,919) | (1,792,622) | (3,697,120) | (5,692,873) | ||||||||||||||||||
Covered Call Strategy | 14,131 | — | (224,724) | — | 1,913,130†† | 1,702,537 | ||||||||||||||||||
Equity Income | 2,657,077 | 7,696,045 | — | — | 151,828,841 | 162,181,963 | ||||||||||||||||||
Global | 958,923 | — | (2,232,649) | (17,831,949) | 48,439,942 | † | 29,334,267 | |||||||||||||||||
Growth & Income | 13,567,156 | 53,662,364 | — | — | 603,449,747 | 670,679,267 | ||||||||||||||||||
Hedged U.S. Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Opportunities | 9,325 | — | (7,734) | — | (39,399) | †† | (37,808) | |||||||||||||||||
International | 1,537,386 | — | (29,410,125) | (2,636,183) | 72,579,307 | † | 42,070,385 | |||||||||||||||||
Opportunity | 5,121,270 | 34,744,541 | — | — | 252,070,376 | 291,936,187 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate | 1,290,031 | 465,681 | — | — | 3,721,053 | 5,476,765 | ||||||||||||||||||
Select Growth | 1,158,311 | 55,550,351 | — | — | 60,093,554 | 116,802,216 | ||||||||||||||||||
Special Situations | 4,115,486 | 3,854,360 | — | — | 93,954,093 | 101,923,939 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Return | 1,329,981 | 11,388,988 | — | — | 166,476,788 | 179,195,757 |
* | Other accumulated losses consist primarily of late loss deferral, post-October loss deferrals and capital loss |
carryovers that cannot yet be utilized. | |
** | Differences between book distributable earnings and tax distributable earnings consist primarily of wash |
sales and amortization of bond premium and discounts. | |
† | Includes currency appreciation (depreciation) for International Opportunities Bond, Global and |
International Funds in the amounts of $(2,064), $(4,753) and $(25,948), respectively. | |
†† | Includes options appreciation (depreciation) for Balanced Income, Covered Call Strategy, and Hedged |
U.S. Equity Opportunities Funds in the amounts of $14,210, $84,898 and $(142,684), respectively. |
327 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2016
For the year ended September 30, 2016, the following reclassifications were made to reflect permanent differences between book and tax reporting which are primarily due to the differences between book and tax treatment of investments in real estate trusts, bond premium amortization, foreign currency transactions, paydowns on securities, fund organization expenses and expiration of capital loss carryovers.
Undistributed | Accumulated | ||||
Ordinary Income | Capital Gains | ||||
Fund | Capital Paid In | (Deficit) | (Losses) | ||
Balanced Income | $ — | $ 10,104 | $ (10,104) | ||
Floating Rate | — | 435,818 | (435,818) | ||
Fund For Income | (5,033,118) | 5,487,746 | (454,628) | ||
Government | (1,063,550) | 1,718,472 | (654,922) | ||
International Opportunities | |||||
Bond | (184,955) | 1,726,662 | (1,541,707) | ||
Investment Grade | — | 2,120,121 | (2,120,121) | ||
Limited Duration High | |||||
Quality Bond | — | 1,416,698 | (1,416,698) | ||
Global | — | 3,550 | (3,550) | ||
Growth & Income | — | 4,866,701 | (4,866,701) | ||
Hedged U.S. | |||||
Equity Opportunities | — | 291 | (291) | ||
International | — | (124,146) | 124,146 | ||
Opportunity | — | 48 | (48) | ||
Real Estate | — | 15,368 | (15,368) | ||
Total Return | — | 2,408,752 | (2,408,752) |
10. Name Change—Effective October 3, 2016, the name of the First Investors Cash Management Fund has been changed to the First Investors Government Cash Management Fund. The Fund intends to operate as a “government money market fund” as defined in Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Fund will invest at least 99.5% of its total assets in U.S. Government Securities, cash and/or repurchase agreements that are collateralized fully by cash and/or U.S. Government Securities. In addition, under normal circumstances, the Fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets, including any borrowings for investment purposes, in U.S. Government Securities and repurchase agreement collateralized fully by cash or U.S. Government Securities.
11. Subsequent Events—Subsequent events occurring after September 30, 2016 have been evaluated for potential impact to this report through the date the financial statements were issued. There were no subsequent events to report that would have a material impact on the Funds’ financial statements.
328 |
This page left intentionally blank. |
329 |
Financial Highlights
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
The following table sets forth the per share operating performance data for a share outstanding,
total return, ratios to average net assets and other supplemental data for each fiscal year ended
September 30 unless otherwise indicated.
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Investment | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Income | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | Income | Expenses*** | (Loss) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | $ 1.00 | 0.00 | % | $135,028 | .12 | % | .12 | % | .00 | % | 1.02 | % | (.90 | )% | N/A | ||||||||||||
2013 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 130,272 | .11 | .11 | .00 | .97 | (.86 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 108,088 | .08 | .08 | .00 | 1.02 | (.94 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 109,566 | .10 | .10 | .00 | 1.08 | (.98 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 122,037 | .33 | .33 | .00 | 1.05 | (.72 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 896 | .12 | .12 | .00 | 1.77 | (1.65 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 571 | .12 | .12 | .00 | 1.72 | (1.60 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 404 | .08 | .08 | .00 | 1.64 | (1.56 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 287 | .10 | .10 | .00 | 1.72 | (1.62 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 248 | .33 | .33 | .00 | 1.77 | (1.44 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(i) | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | †† | 1 | .15 | † | .15 | † | .00 | † | 2.60 | † | (2.45 | )† | N/A | ||||||||||||
2014 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2,595 | .08 | .08 | .00 | .66 | (.58 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2,267 | .10 | .10 | .00 | .67 | (.57 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2,844 | .33 | .33 | .00 | .68 | (.35 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
BALANCED INCOME FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016(e) | $ 10.00 | $.17 | (c) | $.68 | $.85 | $.15 | — | $.15 | $10.70 | 8.55 | % | $29,676 | 1.15 | % | 1.15 | % | 1.61 | % | 2.21 | % | .55 | % | 57 | % | ||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016(e) | 10.00 | .20 | (c) | .69 | .89 | .16 | — | .16 | 10.73 | 8.97 | 109 | .82 | .82 | 1.91 | 1.98 | .75 | 57 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016(e) | 10.00 | .21 | (c) | .69 | .90 | .17 | — | .17 | 10.73 | 9.08 | 157 | .69 | .69 | 2.04 | 1.93 | .80 | 57 |
330 | 331 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Waived, Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | or Reimbursed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | Income | Expenses*** | Income | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
FLOATING RATE FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014(g) | $10.00 | $.21 | (c) | $(.10 | ) | $.11 | $.23 | — | $.23 | $9.88 | 1.12 | %†† | 50,361 | 1.10 | %† | 1.10 | %† | 2.21 | %† | 1.58 | %† | 1.73 | %† | 26 | %†† | |||||||||
2015 | 9.88 | .26 | (c) | (.27 | ) | (.01 | ) | .29 | — | .29 | 9.58 | (.08 | ) | 57,101 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 2.72 | 1.33 | 2.49 | 49 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.58 | .27 | (c) | .09 | .36 | .28 | — | .28 | 9.66 | 3.69 | 61,243 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 2.86 | 1.27 | 2.69 | 38 | |||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014(g) | 10.00 | .25 | (c) | (.11 | ) | .14 | .26 | — | .26 | 9.88 | 1.43 | †† | 34,942 | .90 | † | .90 | † | 2.63 | † | .95 | † | 2.58 | † | 26 | †† | |||||||||
2015 | 9.88 | .28 | (c) | (.26 | ) | .02 | .32 | — | .32 | 9.58 | .18 | 50,122 | .90 | .90 | 2.92 | 1.03 | 2.79 | 49 | ||||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.58 | .29 | (c) | .08 | .37 | .30 | — | .30 | 9.65 | 3.92 | 61,844 | .90 | .90 | 3.06 | .98 | 2.98 | 38 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014(g) | 10.00 | .27 | (c) | (.13 | ) | .14 | .28 | — | .28 | 9.86 | 1.36 | †† | 5,329 | .70 | † | .70 | † | 2.76 | † | 1.06 | † | 2.40 | † | 26 | †† | |||||||||
2015 | 9.86 | .30 | (c) | (.25 | ) | .05 | .34 | — | .34 | 9.57 | .47 | 10,458 | .70 | .70 | 3.17 | .90 | 2.97 | 49 | ||||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.57 | .31 | (c) | .08 | .39 | .32 | — | .32 | 9.64 | 4.14 | 11,456 | .70 | .70 | 3.27 | .83 | 3.14 | 38 | |||||||||||||||||
FUND FOR INCOME | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ 2.35 | $ .16 | $ .25 | $ .41 | $ .16 | — | $ .16 | $ 2.60 | 17.79 | % | $602,370 | 1.26 | % | 1.26 | % | 6.01 | % | 1.29 | % | 5.98 | % | 54 | % | |||||||||||
2013 | 2.60 | .15 | (.01 | ) | .14 | .15 | — | .15 | 2.59 | 5.55 | 647,603 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 5.17 | 1.25 | 5.15 | 60 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2.59 | .12 | (c) | .02 | .14 | .14 | — | .14 | 2.59 | 5.38 | 621,618 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 4.67 | 1.23 | 4.65 | 47 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2.59 | .11 | (c) | (.18 | ) | (.07 | ) | .13 | — | .13 | 2.39 | (2.85 | ) | 567,249 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 4.39 | 1.23 | 4.37 | 47 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2.39 | .11 | (c) | .10 | .21 | .12 | — | .12 | 2.48 | 9.07 | 571,028 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 4.76 | 1.24 | 4.74 | 55 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2.35 | .13 | .26 | .39 | .14 | — | .14 | 2.60 | 17.01 | 5,659 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 5.31 | 1.99 | 5.28 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2.60 | .13 | (.01 | ) | .12 | .13 | — | .13 | 2.59 | 4.84 | 5,001 | 1.99 | 1.99 | 4.42 | 2.01 | 4.40 | 60 | |||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2.59 | .10 | (c) | .02 | .12 | .12 | — | .12 | 2.59 | 4.67 | 4,690 | 2.02 | 2.02 | 3.86 | 2.04 | 3.84 | 47 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2.59 | .09 | (c) | (.18 | ) | (.09 | ) | .11 | — | .11 | 2.39 | (3.65 | ) | 3,376 | 2.01 | 2.01 | 3.60 | 2.03 | 3.58 | 47 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2.39 | .09 | (c) | .10 | .19 | .10 | — | .10 | 2.48 | 7.99 | 2,923 | 2.04 | 2.05 | 3.94 | 2.07 | 3.92 | 55 | |||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(i) | 2.66 | .06 | (.05 | ) | .01 | .08 | — | .08 | 2.59 | .23 | †† | 1 | 1.03 | † | 1.03 | † | 4.59 | † | 5.13 | † | .49 | † | 60 | †† | ||||||||||
2014 | 2.59 | .12 | (c) | .02 | .14 | .14 | — | .14 | 2.59 | 5.42 | 31,132 | .91 | .91 | 4.83 | .93 | 4.81 | 47 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2.59 | .12 | (c) | (.18 | ) | (.06 | ) | .14 | — | .14 | 2.39 | (2.47 | ) | 41,699 | .93 | .93 | 4.65 | .95 | 4.63 | 47 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2.39 | .12 | (c) | .10 | .22 | .13 | — | .13 | 2.48 | 9.34 | 68,198 | .93 | .94 | 5.02 | .96 | 5.00 | 55 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(i) | 2.66 | .03 | (.01 | ) | .02 | .08 | — | .08 | 2.60 | .66 | †† | 18,575 | .81 | † | .81 | † | 4.93 | † | .83 | † | 4.91 | † | 60 | †† | ||||||||||
2014 | 2.60 | .13 | (c) | .02 | .15 | .15 | — | .15 | 2.60 | 5.59 | 42,941 | .78 | .78 | 5.07 | .80 | 5.05 | 47 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2.60 | .12 | (c) | (.17 | ) | (.05 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 2.40 | (2.28 | ) | 51,704 | .78 | .78 | 4.81 | .80 | 4.79 | 47 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 2.40 | .12 | (c) | .10 | .22 | .13 | — | .13 | 2.49 | 9.58 | 62,340 | .79 | .79 | 5.19 | .81 | 5.17 | 55 |
332 | 333 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Investment | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Income | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | (Loss) | Expenses*** | (Loss) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
GOVERNMENT FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $11.59 | $.27 | $ .04 | $ .31 | $.38 | — | $.38 | $11.52 | 2.71 | % | $382,064 | 1.10 | % | 1.10 | % | 2.28 | % | 1.21 | % | 2.17 | % | 36 | % | |||||||||||
2013 | 11.52 | .17 | (.43 | ) | (.26 | ) | .32 | — | .32 | 10.94 | (2.29 | ) | 355,264 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.57 | 1.21 | 1.46 | 101 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 10.94 | .19 | (c) | — | .19 | .26 | — | .26 | 10.87 | 1.71 | 289,928 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 1.76 | 1.18 | 1.65 | 138 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 10.87 | .17 | (c) | .04 | .21 | .25 | — | .25 | 10.83 | 1.90 | 265,856 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.60 | 1.19 | 1.49 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 10.83 | .15 | (c) | .08 | .23 | .21 | — | .21 | 10.85 | 2.16 | 258,545 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 1.40 | 1.19 | 1.29 | 97 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 11.57 | .17 | .07 | .24 | .30 | — | .30 | 11.51 | 2.11 | 6,393 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.59 | 1.91 | 1.47 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 11.51 | .07 | (.42 | ) | (.35 | ) | .24 | — | .24 | 10.92 | (3.06 | ) | 4,717 | 1.84 | 1.84 | .82 | 1.95 | .71 | 101 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 10.92 | .10 | (c) | (.01 | ) | .09 | .17 | — | .17 | 10.84 | .86 | 3,255 | 1.89 | 1.89 | .94 | 2.00 | .83 | 138 | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 10.84 | .08 | (c) | .03 | .11 | .15 | — | .15 | 10.80 | 1.04 | 2,514 | 1.91 | 1.91 | .78 | 2.02 | .67 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 10.80 | .06 | (c) | .09 | .15 | .12 | — | .12 | 10.83 | 1.38 | 2,062 | 1.89 | 1.90 | .59 | 2.01 | .48 | 97 | |||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(i) | 11.29 | .10 | (.30 | ) | (.20 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 10.94 | (1.75 | )†† | 1 | .95 | † | .95 | † | 1.68 | † | 5.17 | † | (2.54 | )† | 101 | †† | |||||||||
2014 | 10.94 | .23 | (c) | (.04 | ) | .19 | .27 | — | .27 | 10.86 | 1.73 | 33,699 | .73 | .73 | 2.06 | .84 | 1.95 | 138 | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 10.86 | .21 | (c) | .03 | .24 | .26 | — | .26 | 10.84 | 2.21 | 50,190 | .78 | .78 | 1.89 | .89 | 1.78 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 10.84 | .18 | (c) | .09 | .27 | .24 | — | .24 | 10.87 | 2.50 | 64,370 | .78 | .78 | 1.70 | .89 | 1.59 | 97 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(i) | 11.29 | .14 | (.31 | ) | (.17 | ) | .16 | — | .16 | 10.96 | (1.54 | )†† | 4,656 | .68 | † | .68 | † | 2.14 | † | .81 | † | 2.01 | † | 101 | †† | |||||||||
2014 | 10.96 | .24 | (c) | (.01 | ) | .23 | .29 | — | .29 | 10.90 | 2.08 | 10,753 | .65 | .65 | 2.17 | .76 | 2.06 | 138 | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 10.90 | .22 | (c) | .04 | .26 | .28 | — | .28 | 10.88 | 2.38 | 14,027 | .65 | .65 | 2.03 | .76 | 1.92 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 10.88 | .20 | (c) | .08 | .28 | .26 | — | .26 | 10.90 | 2.62 | 7,951 | .65 | .65 | 1.85 | .76 | 1.74 | 97 | |||||||||||||||||
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012(j) | $10.00 | $.01 | $.23 | $.24 | $.02 | $— | $.02 | $10.22 | 2.35 | %† | $19,563 | 1.30 | %† | 1.30 | %† | 1.10 | %† | 9.76 | %† | (6.12 | )%† | 5 | %†† | |||||||||||
2013 | 10.22 | .25 | (.32 | ) | (.07 | ) | .30 | .01 | .31 | 9.84 | (.72 | ) | 99,161 | 1.30 | 1.30 | .68 | 1.83 | .15 | 53 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 9.84 | .21 | (c) | .07 | .28 | .27 | — | .27 | 9.85 | 2.84 | 80,197 | 1.30 | 1.30 | 2.06 | 1.41 | 1.95 | 76 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9.85 | .12 | (c) | (1.06 | ) | (.94 | ) | .28 | — | .28 | 8.63 | (9.72 | ) | 69,394 | 1.30 | 1.30 | 1.29 | 1.38 | 1.21 | 61 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 8.63 | .20 | (c) | .51 | .71 | .13 | — | .13 | 9.21 | 8.30 | 65,456 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 2.29 | 1.41 | 2.26 | 72 | |||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(i) | 10.23 | .08 | (.31 | ) | (.23 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 9.85 | (2.26 | )†† | 1 | 1.07 | † | 1.07 | † | (1.43 | )† | 5.23 | † | (5.59 | )† | 53 | †† | |||||||||
2014 | 9.85 | .24 | (c) | .04 | .28 | .28 | — | .28 | 9.85 | 2.81 | 33,851 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 2.21 | N/A | N/A | 76 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9.85 | .14 | (c) | (1.06 | ) | (.92 | ) | .29 | — | .29 | 8.64 | (9.51 | ) | 50,912 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 1.56 | N/A | N/A | 61 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 8.64 | .23 | (c) | .51 | .74 | .13 | — | .13 | 9.25 | 8.70 | 50,749 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 2.60 | N/A | N/A | 72 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(i) | 10.23 | .12 | (.35 | ) | (.23 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 9.85 | (2.26 | )†† | 6,998 | .96 | † | .96 | † | (1.31 | )† | N/A | N/A | 53 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 9.85 | .25 | (c) | .06 | .31 | .28 | — | .28 | 9.88 | 3.19 | 16,014 | .93 | .93 | 2.43 | N/A | N/A | 76 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9.88 | .17 | (c) | (1.08 | ) | (.91 | ) | .30 | — | .30 | 8.67 | (9.36 | ) | 19,097 | .90 | .90 | 1.69 | N/A | N/A | 61 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 8.67 | .24 | (c) | .52 | .76 | .14 | — | .14 | 9.29 | 8.85 | 8,289 | .93 | .93 | 2.75 | N/A | N/A | 72 |
334 | 335 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Investment | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Income | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | (Loss) | Expenses*** | (Loss) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ 9.62 | $ .38 | $ .68 | $ 1.06 | $ .41 | — | $ .41 | $ 10.27 | 11.22 | % | $ 531,896 | 1.08 | % | 1.08 | % | 3.54 | % | 1.19 | % | 3.43 | % | 40 | % | |||||||||||
2013 | 10.27 | .35 | (.46 | ) | (.11 | ) | .38 | — | .38 | 9.78 | (1.10 | ) | 543,955 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 3.20 | 1.18 | 3.09 | 33 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 9.78 | .31 | (c) | .22 | .53 | .39 | — | .39 | 9.92 | 5.50 | 475,090 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 3.11 | 1.16 | 3.00 | 49 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9.92 | .28 | (c) | (.17 | ) | .11 | .39 | — | .39 | 9.64 | 1.12 | 458,704 | 1.04 | 1.04 | 2.85 | 1.15 | 2.74 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.64 | .27 | (c) | .35 | .62 | .36 | — | .36 | 9.90 | 6.55 | 477,010 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 2.78 | 1.15 | 2.68 | 37 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 9.62 | .32 | .66 | .98 | .34 | — | .34 | 10.26 | 10.41 | 8,036 | 1.78 | 1.78 | 2.84 | 1.89 | 2.74 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 10.26 | .27 | (.45 | ) | (.18 | ) | .32 | — | .32 | 9.76 | (1.82 | ) | 6,161 | 1.84 | 1.84 | 2.42 | 1.94 | 2.32 | 33 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 9.76 | .22 | (c) | .22 | .44 | .33 | — | .33 | 9.87 | 4.53 | 4,727 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 2.24 | 2.03 | 2.13 | 49 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9.87 | .20 | (c) | (.17 | ) | .03 | .33 | — | .33 | 9.57 | .27 | 3,623 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 1.98 | 2.03 | 1.87 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.57 | .19 | (c) | .34 | .53 | .27 | — | .27 | 9.83 | 5.61 | 2,907 | 1.92 | 1.92 | 1.91 | 2.03 | 1.80 | 37 | |||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(i) | 10.23 | .08 | (.34 | ) | (.26 | ) | .19 | — | .19 | 9.78 | (2.53 | )†† | 1 | .95 | † | .95 | † | 2.64 | † | 5.17 | † | (1.58 | )† | 33 | †† | |||||||||
2014 | 9.78 | .34 | (c) | .20 | .54 | .40 | — | .40 | 9.92 | 5.61 | 44,351 | .69 | .69 | 3.38 | .80 | 3.27 | 49 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9.92 | .31 | (c) | (.16 | ) | .15 | .40 | — | .40 | 9.67 | 1.53 | 63,614 | .73 | .73 | 3.17 | .84 | 3.06 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.67 | .30 | (c) | .34 | .64 | .37 | — | .37 | 9.94 | 6.78 | 83,659 | .74 | .74 | 3.08 | .85 | 2.97 | 37 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(i) | 10.23 | .14 | (.38 | ) | (.24 | ) | .20 | — | .20 | 9.79 | (2.37 | )†† | 9,326 | .66 | † | .66 | † | 3.06 | † | .77 | † | 2.95 | † | 33 | †† | |||||||||
2014 | 9.79 | .35 | (c) | .23 | .58 | .43 | — | .43 | 9.94 | 5.98 | 22,269 | .63 | .63 | 3.51 | .74 | 3.40 | 49 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9.94 | .32 | (c) | (.17 | ) | .15 | .43 | — | .43 | 9.66 | 1.48 | 15,025 | .63 | .63 | 3.26 | .74 | 3.15 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.66 | .31 | (c) | .35 | .66 | .40 | — | .40 | 9.92 | 6.97 | 31,395 | .63 | .63 | 3.17 | .74 | 3.06 | 37 | |||||||||||||||||
LIMITED DURATION HIGH QUALITY BOND FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014(f) | $ | 10.00 | $ — | (c) | $(.05 | ) | $(.05 | ) | $.06 | — | $.06 | $ 9.89 | (.50 | )%†† | $ 8,911 | 1.05 | %† | 1.05 | %† | .15 | %† | 3.37 | %† | (2.17 | )%† | 19 | %†† | |||||||
2015 | 9.89 | .03 | (c) | .04 | .07 | .20 | — | .20 | 9.76 | .67 | 26,852 | 1.05 | 1.05 | .37 | 1.32 | .10 | 57 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.76 | (.03 | )(c) | .15 | .12 | .22 | — | .22 | 9.66 | 1.21 | 48,342 | 1.05 | 1.05 | (.25 | ) | 1.23 | (.43 | ) | 54 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014(f) | 10.00 | .02 | (c) | (.05 | ) | (.03 | ) | .06 | — | .06 | 9.91 | (.28 | )†† | 25,649 | .75 | † | .75 | † | .46 | † | 1.02 | † | .19 | † | 19 | †† | ||||||||
2015 | 9.91 | .06 | (c) | .05 | .11 | .22 | — | .22 | 9.80 | 1.08 | 40,502 | .75 | .75 | .66 | 1.09 | .32 | 57 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.80 | — | (c) | .14 | .14 | .25 | — | .25 | 9.69 | 1.47 | 50,645 | .75 | .75 | .04 | 1.01 | (.22 | ) | 54 | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014(f) | 10.00 | .02 | (c) | (.03 | ) | (.01 | ) | .07 | — | .07 | 9.92 | (.14 | )†† | 5,125 | .60 | † | .60 | † | .53 | † | 3.32 | † | (2.19 | )† | 19 | †† | ||||||||
2015 | 9.92 | .08 | (c) | .04 | .12 | .23 | — | .23 | 9.81 | 1.21 | 6,747 | .60 | .60 | .81 | .92 | .49 | 57 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.81 | .02 | (c) | .14 | .16 | .27 | — | .27 | 9.70 | 1.64 | 22,296 | .60 | .60 | .20 | .82 | (.02 | ) | 54 |
336 | 337 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Investment | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Income | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | Income | Expenses*** | (Loss) | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(h) | $10.00 | $.14 | (a) | $(.23 | ) | $(.09 | ) | $.13 | $— | $.13 | $9.78 | (.87 | )%†† | $ 47,344 | 1.30 | %†(b) | 1.30 | %†(b) | 2.88 | %†(a) | 2.10 | %†(b) | 2.08 | %†(a) | 19 | %†† | |||||||||
2014 | 9.78 | .32 | (a)(c) | .12 | .44 | .28 | .00 | (d) | .28 | 9.94 | 4.55 | 101,540 | .80 | (b) | .80 | (b) | 3.18 | (a) | .68 | (b) | 3.30 | (a) | 20 | ||||||||||||
2015 | 9.94 | .34 | (a)(c) | (.57 | ) | (.23 | ) | .34 | .07 | .41 | 9.30 | (2.37 | ) | 131,734 | .59 | (b) | .59 | (b) | 3.55 | (a) | N/A | N/A | 40 | ||||||||||||
2016 | 9.30 | .30 | (a)(c) | .22 | .52 | .32 | .02 | .34 | 9.48 | 5.64 | 149,190 | .58 | (b) | .58 | (b) | 3.19 | (a) | N/A | N/A | 49 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(h) | 10.00 | .14 | (a) | (.22 | ) | (.08 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 9.77 | (.79 | )†† | 1 | 1.00 | †(b) | 1.00 | †(b) | 2.89 | †(a) | 14.79 | †(b) | (10.90) | †(a) | 19 | †† | |||||||||
2014 | 9.77 | .36 | (a)(c) | .11 | .47 | .32 | .00 | (d) | .32 | 9.92 | 4.82 | 323 | .36 | (b) | .36 | (b) | 3.62 | (a) | .29 | (b) | 3.69 | (a) | 20 | ||||||||||||
2015 | 9.92 | .38 | (a)(c) | (.56 | ) | (.18 | ) | .38 | .07 | .45 | 9.29 | (1.93 | ) | 306 | .19 | (b) | .19 | (b) | 3.95 | (a) | N/A | N/A | 40 | ||||||||||||
2016 | 9.29 | .33 | (a)(c) | .23 | .56 | .36 | .02 | .38 | 9.47 | 6.14 | 415 | .17 | (b) | .17 | (b) | 3.59 | (a) | N/A | N/A | 49 |
* | Calculated without sales charges. | |
** | Net of expenses waived or assumed (Note 3). | |
*** | The ratios do not include a reduction of expenses from cash balances maintained with the custodian | |
or from brokerage service arrangements (Note 1G). | ||
† | Annualized | |
†† | Not annualized | |
(a) | Recognition of net investment income by the Fund is affected by the timing of the declaration | |
of dividends by the underlying investment companies in which the Fund invests. The ratio does not | ||
include net investment income of the investment companies in which the Fund invests. | ||
(b) | Does not include expenses of the investment companies in which the Fund invests. | |
(c) | Based on average shares during the period. | |
(d) | Due to rounding, amount is less than .005 per share. | |
(e) | For the period October 1, 2015 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016. | |
(f) | For the period May 19, 2014 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014. | |
(g) | For the period October 21, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2014. | |
(h) | For the period April 3, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013. | |
(i) | For the period April 1, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013. | |
(j) | For the period August 20, 2012 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2012. |
338 | See notes to financial statements | 339 |
Financial Highlights
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
The following table sets forth the per share operating performance data for a share outstanding,
total return, ratios to average net assets and other supplemental data for each fiscal year ended
September 30, except as otherwise indicated.
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Investment | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Income | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | Income | Expenses*** | (Loss) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
COVERED CALL STRATEGY FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016(d) | $10.00 | $ .06 | (a) | $ .33 | $ .39 | $ .03 | $ — | $.03 | $10.36 | 3.94 | %†† | $ 48,514 | 1.28 | %† | 1.28 | %† | 1.21 | %† | 1.73 | %† | .76 | %† | 83 | %†† | ||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016(d) | 10.00 | .08 | (a) | .32 | .40 | .06 | — | .06 | 10.34 | 4.05 | †† | 39,129 | .98 | † | .98 | † | 1.63 | † | 1.50 | † | 1.11 | † | 83 | †† | ||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016(d) | 10.00 | .09 | (a) | .33 | .42 | .07 | — | .07 | 10.35 | 4.18 | †† | 4,214 | .83 | † | .83 | † | 1.77 | † | 1.25 | † | 1.35 | † | 83 | †† | ||||||||||
EQUITY INCOME FUND(g) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ 6.20 | $ .13 | $ 1.44 | $ 1.57 | $ .10 | $ — | $ .10 | $ 7.67 | 25.36 | % | $ 392,001 | 1.33 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.75 | % | N/A | N/A | 38 | % | |||||||||||||
2013 | 7.67 | .14 | 1.32 | 1.46 | .14 | — | .14 | 8.99 | 19.14 | 475,422 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.66 | N/A | N/A | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 8.99 | .13 | (a) | 1.16 | 1.29 | .14 | .15 | .29 | 9.99 | 14.48 | 510,981 | 1.21 | 1.22 | 1.33 | N/A | N/A | 27 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9.99 | .15 | (a) | (.54 | ) | (.39 | ) | .15 | .46 | .61 | 8.99 | (4.31 | ) | 485,342 | 1.21 | 1.21 | 1.52 | N/A | N/A | 23 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 8.99 | .16 | (a) | 1.08 | 1.24 | .16 | .35 | .51 | 9.72 | 14.16 | 529,327 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.72 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 6.10 | .08 | 1.42 | 1.50 | .05 | — | .05 | 7.55 | 24.56 | 6,939 | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.02 | N/A | N/A | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 7.55 | .09 | 1.28 | 1.37 | .08 | — | .08 | 8.84 | 18.21 | 6,337 | 2.05 | 2.05 | .90 | N/A | N/A | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 8.84 | .05 | (a) | 1.13 | 1.18 | .05 | .15 | .20 | 9.82 | 13.49 | 5,721 | 2.06 | 2.06 | .49 | N/A | N/A | 27 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9.82 | .06 | (a) | (.53 | ) | (.47 | ) | .07 | .46 | .53 | 8.82 | (5.16 | ) | 3,847 | 2.06 | 2.06 | .67 | N/A | N/A | 23 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 8.82 | .08 | (a) | 1.06 | 1.14 | .09 | .35 | .44 | 9.52 | 13.20 | 3,446 | 2.07 | 2.07 | .87 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 8.40 | .08 | .58 | .66 | .07 | — | .07 | 8.99 | 7.87 | †† | 1 | 1.01 | † | 1.01 | † | 1.78 | † | 4.68 | %† | (1.89 | )%† | 32 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 8.99 | .17 | (a) | 1.13 | 1.30 | .15 | .15 | .30 | 9.99 | 14.57 | 32,160 | .81 | .81 | 1.71 | N/A | N/A | 27 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9.99 | .19 | (a) | (.55 | ) | (.36 | ) | .17 | .46 | .63 | 9.00 | (3.96 | ) | 38,482 | .84 | .84 | 1.90 | N/A | N/A | 23 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.00 | .20 | (a) | 1.08 | 1.28 | .19 | .35 | .54 | 9.74 | 14.63 | 54,576 | .85 | .85 | 2.08 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 8.40 | .04 | .63 | .67 | .05 | — | .05 | 9.02 | 7.95 | †† | 4,717 | .86 | † | .86 | † | 1.74 | † | .86 | † | 1.74 | † | 32 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 9.02 | .17 | (a) | 1.16 | 1.33 | .17 | .15 | .32 | 10.03 | 14.88 | 7,399 | .80 | .80 | 1.76 | N/A | N/A | 27 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 10.03 | .19 | (a) | (.55 | ) | (.36 | ) | .17 | .46 | .63 | 9.04 | (3.97 | ) | 9,773 | .81 | .81 | 1.93 | N/A | N/A | 23 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 9.04 | .20 | (a) | 1.09 | 1.29 | .20 | .35 | .55 | 9.78 | 14.67 | 2,448 | .78 | .78 | 2.08 | N/A | N/A | 22 |
340 | 341 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Investment | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Income | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | (Loss) | Expenses*** | (Loss) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
GLOBAL FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $5.54 | $ .03 | $1.24 | $1.27 | $.02 | $— | $.02 | $6.79 | 22.88 | % | $283,328 | 1.68 | % | 1.69 | % | .44 | % | 1.70 | % | .42 | % | 94 | % | |||||||||||
2013 | 6.79 | .05 | 1.20 | 1.25 | .03 | — | .03 | 8.01 | 18.56 | 317,329 | 1.60 | 1.61 | .66 | 1.62 | .65 | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 8.01 | —(a) | .80 | .80 | .04 | .11 | .15 | 8.66 | 10.00 | 332,416 | 1.49 | 1.49 | .03 | 1.54 | (.02 | ) | 154 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 8.66 | —(a) | .11 | .11 | — | 1.51 | 1.51 | 7.26 | .87 | 331,382 | 1.47 | 1.47 | (.01 | ) | 1.52 | (.06 | ) | 97 | ||||||||||||||||
2016 | 7.26 | .01 | (a) | .43 | .44 | .00 | (b) | .40 | .40 | 7.30 | 6.03 | 339,956 | 1.47 | 1.47 | .09 | 1.52 | .04 | 94 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 4.81 | (.09 | ) | 1.15 | 1.06 | .01 | — | .01 | 5.86 | 21.99 | 4,388 | 2.38 | 2.39 | (.27 | ) | 2.40 | (.29 | ) | 94 | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 5.86 | (.07 | ) | 1.09 | 1.02 | .02 | — | .02 | 6.86 | 17.55 | 4,419 | 2.36 | 2.36 | (.10 | ) | 2.38 | (.12 | ) | 92 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 6.86 | (.06 | )(a) | .69 | .63 | — | .11 | .11 | 7.38 | 9.18 | 4,023 | 2.31 | 2.31 | (.79 | ) | 2.36 | (.84 | ) | 154 | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 7.38 | (.05 | )(a) | .10 | .05 | — | 1.51 | 1.51 | 5.92 | .09 | 3,405 | 2.28 | 2.28 | (.82 | ) | 2.33 | (.87 | ) | 97 | |||||||||||||||
2016 | 5.92 | (.04 | )(a) | .36 | .32 | — | .40 | .40 | 5.84 | 5.29 | 2,937 | 2.27 | 2.27 | (.72 | ) | 2.32 | (.77 | ) | 94 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 7.28 | .06 | .67 | .73 | — | — | — | 8.01 | 10.03 | †† | 1 | 1.27 | † | 1.27 | † | 1.46 | † | 4.88 | † | (2.15 | )† | 92 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 8.01 | — | (a) | .82 | .82 | — | .11 | .11 | 8.72 | 10.24 | 66,590 | 1.06 | 1.06 | .53 | 1.11 | .48 | 154 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 8.72 | .03 | (a) | .12 | .15 | — | 1.51 | 1.51 | 7.36 | 1.37 | 114,556 | 1.06 | 1.06 | .43 | 1.11 | .38 | 97 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 7.36 | .04 | (a) | .44 | .48 | .01 | .40 | .41 | 7.43 | 6.48 | 169,088 | 1.05 | 1.05 | .53 | 1.10 | .48 | 94 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 7.28 | .06 | .68 | .74 | — | — | — | 8.02 | 10.17 | †† | 1 | 1.14 | † | 1.14 | † | 1.55 | † | 4.59 | † | (1.90 | )† | 92 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 8.02 | — | (a) | .84 | .84 | — | .11 | .11 | 8.75 | 10.48 | 3,001 | 1.03 | 1.03 | .48 | 1.08 | .43 | 154 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 8.75 | .04 | (a) | .11 | .15 | — | 1.51 | 1.51 | 7.39 | 1.37 | 2,955 | 1.02 | 1.02 | .45 | 1.07 | .40 | 97 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 7.39 | .04 | (a) | .45 | .49 | .01 | .40 | .41 | 7.47 | 6.61 | 3,288 | 1.01 | 1.01 | .55 | 1.06 | .50 | 94 |
342 | 343 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | Income | Expenses*** | Loss | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
GROWTH & INCOME FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $12.78 | $.21 | $3.81 | $4.02 | $.14 | $ — | $ .14 | $16.66 | 31.60 | % | $1,225,684 | 1.29 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.35 | % | N/A | N/A | 22 | % | |||||||||||||
2013 | 16.66 | .20 | 3.90 | 4.10 | .22 | — | .22 | 20.54 | 24.86 | 1,538,582 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.11 | N/A | N/A | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 20.54 | .18 | (a) | 2.92 | 3.10 | .20 | .68 | .88 | 22.76 | 15.26 | 1,632,920 | 1.15 | 1.15 | .80 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 22.76 | .20 | (a) | (1.37 | ) | (1.17 | ) | .19 | 1.05 | 1.24 | 20.35 | (5.62 | ) | 1,496,803 | 1.15 | 1.15 | .89 | N/A | N/A | 23 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 20.35 | .26 | (a) | 2.07 | 2.33 | .24 | .93 | 1.17 | 21.51 | 11.72 | 1,588,423 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.28 | N/A | N/A | 23 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 12.01 | .10 | 3.58 | 3.68 | .05 | — | .05 | 15.64 | 30.71 | 27,306 | 1.99 | 1.99 | .63 | N/A | N/A | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 15.64 | .06 | 3.67 | 3.73 | .11 | — | .11 | 19.26 | 24.02 | 27,762 | 1.96 | 1.96 | .37 | N/A | N/A | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 19.26 | — | (a) | 2.73 | 2.73 | — | .68 | .68 | 21.31 | 14.32 | 25,497 | 1.93 | 1.93 | .02 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 21.31 | .02 | (a) | (1.27 | ) | (1.25 | ) | .04 | 1.05 | 1.09 | 18.97 | (6.33 | ) | 19,316 | 1.93 | 1.93 | .11 | N/A | N/A | 23 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 18.97 | .10 | (a) | 1.91 | 2.01 | .08 | .93 | 1.01 | 19.97 | 10.82 | 17,047 | 1.94 | 1.94 | .50 | N/A | N/A | 23 | |||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 18.49 | .13 | 2.00 | 2.13 | .08 | — | .08 | 20.54 | 11.53 | †† | 1 | .97 | † | .97 | † | 1.31 | † | 4.60 | %† | (2.32) | %† | 20 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 20.54 | .27 | (a) | 2.91 | 3.18 | .20 | .68 | .88 | 22.84 | 15.67 | 123,039 | .74 | .74 | 1.17 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 22.84 | .29 | (a) | (1.38 | ) | (1.09 | ) | .24 | 1.05 | 1.29 | 20.46 | (5.24 | ) | 141,229 | .75 | .75 | 1.29 | N/A | N/A | 23 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 20.46 | .35 | (a) | 2.08 | 2.43 | .29 | .93 | 1.22 | 21.67 | 12.18 | 132,486 | .77 | .77 | 1.68 | N/A | N/A | 23 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 18.49 | .15 | 2.00 | 2.15 | .09 | — | .09 | 20.55 | 11.64 | †† | 1 | .78 | † | .78 | † | 1.50 | † | 4.19 | † | (1.91 | )† | 20 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 20.55 | .27 | (a) | 2.92 | 3.19 | .28 | .68 | .96 | 22.78 | 15.75 | 9,746 | .74 | .74 | 1.21 | N/A | N/A | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 22.78 | .29 | (a) | (1.39 | ) | (1.10 | ) | .24 | 1.05 | 1.29 | 20.39 | (5.27 | ) | 9,380 | .75 | .75 | 1.29 | N/A | N/A | 23 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 20.39 | .35 | (a) | 2.07 | 2.42 | .30 | .93 | 1.23 | 21.58 | 12.18 | 10,596 | .74 | .74 | 1.70 | N/A | N/A | 23 |
344 | 345 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Net | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Investment | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | (Loss) | Expenses*** | Loss | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016(c) | $10.00 | $ — | (a) | $ (.09 | ) | $ (.09 | ) | $ — | $— | $— | $ 9.91 | (.90 | )%†† | $ 9,265 | 3.42 | %† | 3.42 | %† | .04 | %† | 8.40 | %† | (4.94 | )%† | 7 | %†† | ||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016(c) | 10.00 | — | (a) | (.09 | ) | (.09 | ) | — | — | — | 9.91 | (.90 | )†† | 24,539 | 2.80 | † | 2.80 | † | .57 | † | 6.69 | † | (3.32 | )† | 7 | †† | ||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016(c) | 10.00 | .01 | (a) | (.10 | ) | (.09 | ) | — | — | — | 9.91 | (.90 | )†† | 99 | 2.59 | † | 2.59 | † | .63 | † | 6.45 | † | (3.23 | )† | 7 | †† | ||||||||
INTERNATIONAL FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ 9.54 | $ .10 | $2.20 | $2.30 | $.16 | — | $.16 | $11.68 | 24.34 | % | $165,797 | 1.82 | % | 1.82 | % | .86 | % | N/A | N/A | 41 | % | |||||||||||||
2013 | 11.68 | .04 | .81 | .85 | — | — | — | 12.53 | 7.28 | 215,873 | 1.71 | 1.71 | .34 | N/A | N/A | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 12.53 | .05 | (a) | .50 | .55 | .02 | — | .02 | 13.06 | 4.43 | 193,174 | 1.66 | 1.66 | .39 | N/A | N/A | 34 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 13.06 | .05 | (a) | (.41 | ) | (.36 | ) | .05 | — | .05 | 12.65 | (2.78 | ) | 194,991 | 1.64 | 1.64 | .40 | N/A | N/A | 27 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 12.65 | .06 | (a) | 1.05 | 1.11 | .05 | — | .05 | 13.71 | 8.80 | 209,205 | 1.61 | 1.61 | .45 | N/A | N/A | 28 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 9.24 | (.04 | ) | 2.19 | 2.15 | .14 | — | .14 | 11.25 | 23.50 | 3,328 | 2.52 | 2.52 | (.02 | ) | N/A | N/A | 41 | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 11.25 | (.11 | ) | .84 | .73 | — | — | — | 11.98 | 6.49 | 3,200 | 2.46 | 2.46 | (.45 | ) | N/A | N/A | 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2014 | 11.98 | (.05 | )(a) | .47 | .42 | — | — | — | 12.40 | 3.51 | 2,893 | 2.49 | 2.49 | (.42 | ) | N/A | N/A | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 12.40 | (.06 | )(a) | (.38 | ) | (.44 | ) | — | — | — | 11.96 | (3.55 | ) | 2,094 | 2.47 | 2.47 | (.49 | ) | N/A | N/A | 27 | |||||||||||||
2016 | 11.96 | (.06 | )(a) | 1.00 | .94 | .03 | — | .03 | 12.87 | 7.83 | 1,607 | 2.45 | 2.45 | (.45 | ) | N/A | N/A | 28 | ||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 12.79 | .06 | (.30 | ) | (.24 | ) | — | — | — | 12.55 | (1.88 | )†† | 1 | 1.45 | † | 1.45 | † | .97 | † | 5.30 | %† | (2.88 | )%† | 31 | †† | |||||||||
2014 | 12.55 | .14 | (a) | .44 | .58 | — | — | — | 13.13 | 4.62 | 35,249 | 1.27 | 1.27 | .98 | N/A | N/A | 34 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 13.13 | .11 | (a) | (.43 | ) | (.32 | ) | .05 | — | .05 | 12.76 | (2.45 | ) | 57,623 | 1.24 | 1.24 | .83 | N/A | N/A | 27 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 12.76 | .11 | (a) | 1.06 | 1.17 | .06 | — | .06 | 13.87 | 9.22 | 81,525 | 1.23 | 1.24 | .85 | N/A | N/A | 28 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 12.79 | .08 | (.31 | ) | (.23 | ) | — | — | — | 12.56 | (1.80 | )†† | 1 | 1.19 | † | 1.19 | † | 1.23 | † | 4.84 | † | (2.42 | )† | 31 | †† | |||||||||
2014 | 12.56 | .12 | (a) | .51 | .63 | — | — | — | 13.19 | 5.02 | 2,357 | 1.17 | 1.17 | .93 | N/A | N/A | 34 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 13.19 | .12 | (a) | (.43 | ) | (.31 | ) | .10 | — | .10 | 12.78 | (2.33 | ) | 2,347 | 1.14 | 1.14 | .89 | N/A | N/A | 27 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 12.78 | .13 | (a) | 1.07 | 1.20 | .07 | — | .07 | 13.91 | 9.39 | 2,695 | 1.12 | 1.12 | .95 | N/A | N/A | 28 |
346 | 347 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Net | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Investment | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | (Loss) | Expenses*** | Loss | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
OPPORTUNITY FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $24.07 | $ .26 | $6.10 | $6.36 | $.17 | $ .89 | $1.06 | $29.37 | 26.99 | % | $529,886 | 1.35 | % | 1.35 | % | .94 | % | N/A | N/A | 36 | % | |||||||||||||
2013 | 29.37 | .18 | 9.64 | 9.82 | .26 | .80 | 1.06 | 38.13 | 34.47 | 726,942 | 1.28 | 1.28 | .56 | N/A | N/A | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 38.13 | .07 | (a) | 5.29 | 5.36 | .16 | 2.43 | 2.59 | 40.90 | 14.20 | 805,113 | 1.20 | 1.20 | .16 | N/A | N/A | 34 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 40.90 | .04 | (a) | (.39 | ) | (.35 | ) | .06 | 2.70 | 2.76 | 37.79 | (1.16 | ) | 818,955 | 1.20 | 1.20 | .11 | N/A | N/A | 37 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 37.79 | .20 | (a) | 2.52 | 2.72 | .04 | 3.18 | 3.22 | 37.29 | 7.39 | 880,274 | 1.22 | 1.22 | .54 | N/A | N/A | 36 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 20.85 | .01 | 5.31 | 5.32 | .13 | .89 | 1.02 | 25.15 | 26.12 | 13,129 | 2.05 | 2.05 | .15 | N/A | N/A | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 25.15 | (.12 | ) | 8.26 | 8.14 | .22 | .80 | 1.02 | 32.27 | 33.49 | 13,677 | 2.02 | 2.02 | (.18 | ) | N/A | N/A | 40 | ||||||||||||||||
2014 | 32.27 | (.21 | )(a) | 4.47 | 4.26 | — | 2.43 | 2.43 | 34.10 | 13.32 | 12,145 | 1.99 | 1.99 | (.63 | ) | N/A | N/A | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 34.10 | (.23 | )(a) | (.29 | ) | (.52 | ) | — | 2.70 | 2.70 | 30.88 | (1.94 | ) | 9,691 | 1.97 | 1.97 | (.67 | ) | N/A | N/A | 37 | |||||||||||||
2016 | 30.88 | (.07 | )(a) | 2.05 | 1.98 | — | 3.18 | 3.18 | 29.68 | 6.58 | 8,606 | 1.99 | 1.99 | (.22 | ) | N/A | N/A | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 33.13 | .16 | 4.89 | 5.05 | — | — | — | 38.18 | 15.24 | †† | 1 | .98 | † | .98 | † | .91 | † | 4.48 | %† | (2.59 | )%† | 40 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 38.18 | .23 | (a) | 5.22 | 5.45 | — | 2.43 | 2.43 | 41.20 | 14.43 | 35,733 | .90 | .90 | .51 | N/A | N/A | 34 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 41.20 | .16 | (a) | (.40 | ) | (.24 | ) | .08 | 2.70 | 2.78 | 38.18 | (.87 | ) | 48,322 | .91 | .91 | .40 | N/A | N/A | 37 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 38.18 | .30 | (a) | 2.56 | 2.86 | .07 | 3.18 | 3.25 | 37.79 | 7.69 | 73,477 | .93 | .93 | .83 | N/A | N/A | 36 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 33.13 | .19 | 4.89 | 5.08 | — | — | — | 38.21 | 15.33 | †† | 1 | .85 | † | .85 | † | 1.06 | † | 4.17 | † | (2.26 | )† | 40 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 38.21 | .24 | (a) | 5.30 | 5.54 | .17 | 2.43 | 2.60 | 41.15 | 14.66 | 3,838 | .79 | .79 | .58 | N/A | N/A | 34 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 41.15 | .22 | (a) | (.40 | ) | (.18 | ) | .20 | 2.70 | 2.90 | 38.07 | (.74 | ) | 4,228 | .78 | .78 | .52 | N/A | N/A | 37 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 38.07 | .36 | (a) | 2.54 | 2.90 | .08 | 3.18 | 3.26 | 37.71 | 7.84 | 4,975 | .79 | .79 | .98 | N/A | N/A | 36 |
348 | 349 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Investment | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Income | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | (Loss) | Expenses*** | (Loss) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
REAL ESTATE FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015(e) | $10.00 | $ .09 | (a) | $(1.06 | ) | $(.97 | ) | $.07 | $ — | $ .07 | $ 8.96 | (9.67 | )%†† | $11,410 | 1.45 | %† | 1.45 | %† | 1.99 | %† | 2.31 | %† | 1.13 | %† | 18 | %†† | ||||||||
2016 | 8.96 | .24 | (a) | 1.11 | 1.35 | .18 | .02 | .20 | 10.11 | 15.19 | 27,741 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 2.47 | 1.54 | 2.38 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015(e) | 10.00 | .11 | (a) | (1.06 | ) | (.95 | ) | .07 | — | .07 | 8.98 | (9.45 | )†† | 40,824 | 1.12 | † | 1.12 | † | 2.36 | † | 1.63 | † | 1.85 | † | 18 | †† | ||||||||
2016 | 8.98 | .27 | (a) | 1.13 | 1.40 | .21 | .02 | .23 | 10.15 | 15.66 | 55,218 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 2.75 | 1.21 | 2.66 | 31 | † | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015(e) | 10.00 | .09 | (a) | (1.04 | ) | (.95 | ) | .09 | — | .09 | 8.96 | (9.45 | )†† | 963 | 1.00 | † | 1.00 | † | 2.08 | † | 2.18 | † | .90 | † | 18 | †† | ||||||||
2016 | 8.96 | .28 | (a) | 1.13 | 1.41 | .21 | .02 | .23 | 10.14 | 15.89 | 634 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2.87 | 1.06 | 2.81 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||
SELECT GROWTH FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $ 6.31 | $ (.03 | ) | $1.70 | $1.67 | $— | $ — | $— | $ 7.98 | 26.47 | % | $271,019 | 1.42 | % | 1.42 | % | (.35 | )% | N/A | N/A | 53 | % | ||||||||||||
2013 | 7.98 | .02 | 1.24 | 1.26 | — | — | — | 9.24 | 15.79 | 315,833 | 1.35 | 1.35 | .25 | N/A | N/A | 71 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 9.24 | — | (a) | 1.73 | 1.73 | .00 | (b) | — | .00 | (b) | 10.97 | 18.77 | 330,595 | 1.27 | 1.27 | .03 | N/A | N/A | 33 | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 10.97 | .02 | (a) | .65 | .67 | .00 | (b) | — | .00 | (b) | 11.64 | 6.12 | 352,651 | 1.25 | 1.25 | .16 | N/A | N/A | 48 | |||||||||||||||
2016 | 11.64 | .02 | (a) | .73 | .75 | .02 | 1.13 | 1.15 | 11.24 | 6.50 | 373,279 | 1.27 | 1.27 | .22 | N/A | N/A | 59 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 5.77 | (.09 | ) | 1.57 | 1.48 | — | — | — | 7.25 | 25.65 | 5,853 | 2.12 | 2.12 | (1.07 | ) | N/A | N/A | 53 | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 7.25 | (.06 | ) | 1.15 | 1.09 | — | — | — | 8.34 | 15.03 | 5,308 | 2.10 | 2.10 | (.48 | ) | N/A | N/A | 71 | ||||||||||||||||
2014 | 8.34 | (.07 | )(a) | 1.55 | 1.48 | — | — | — | 9.82 | 17.75 | 4,868 | 2.06 | 2.06 | (.76 | ) | N/A | N/A | 33 | ||||||||||||||||
2015 | 9.82 | (.07 | )(a) | .59 | .52 | — | — | — | 10.34 | 5.30 | 4,101 | 2.03 | 2.03 | (.63 | ) | N/A | N/A | 48 | ||||||||||||||||
2016 | 10.34 | (.06 | )(a) | .65 | .59 | .00 | (b) | 1.13 | 1.13 | 9.80 | 5.71 | 3,393 | 2.03 | 2.03 | (.56 | ) | N/A | N/A | 59 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 8.46 | .01 | .79 | .80 | — | — | — | 9.26 | 9.46 | †† | 1 | 1.02 | † | 1.02 | † | .25 | † | 4.63 | %† | (3.36 | )%† | 71 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 9.26 | .06 | (a) | 1.69 | 1.75 | — | — | — | 11.01 | 18.90 | 31,902 | .83 | .83 | .51 | N/A | N/A | 33 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 11.01 | .07 | (a) | .66 | .73 | .01 | — | .01 | 11.73 | 6.61 | 46,793 | .84 | .84 | .57 | N/A | N/A | 48 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 11.73 | .07 | (a) | .73 | .80 | .03 | 1.13 | 1.16 | 11.37 | 6.93 | 66,588 | .85 | .86 | .62 | N/A | N/A | 59 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 8.46 | .02 | .79 | .81 | — | — | — | 9.27 | 9.57 | †† | 1 | .89 | † | .89 | † | .39 | † | 4.32 | † | (3.04 | )† | 71 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 9.27 | .05 | (a) | 1.74 | 1.79 | — | — | — | 11.06 | 19.31 | 3,057 | .83 | .83 | .48 | N/A | N/A | 33 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 11.06 | .07 | (a) | .66 | .73 | .02 | — | .02 | 11.77 | 6.56 | 3,608 | .82 | .82 | .59 | N/A | N/A | 48 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 11.77 | .07 | (a) | .74 | .81 | .03 | 1.13 | 1.16 | 11.42 | 7.00 | 3,915 | .83 | .83 | .66 | N/A | N/A | 59 |
350 | 351 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Investment | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Income | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | (Loss) | Expenses*** | (Loss) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $21.72 | $ .01 | $4.46 | $4.47 | $.03 | $1.76 | $1.79 | $24.40 | 21.19 | % | $342,939 | 1.43 | % | 1.43 | % | .03 | % | 1.53 | % | (.07 | )% | 41 | % | |||||||||||
2013 | 24.40 | .11 | 4.68 | 4.79 | .12 | 1.00 | 1.12 | 28.07 | 20.47 | 412,102 | 1.39 | 1.39 | .42 | 1.47 | .34 | 110 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 28.07 | .02 | (a) | 3.16 | 3.18 | — | 4.60 | 4.60 | 26.65 | 11.65 | 425,957 | 1.33 | 1.33 | .06 | 1.38 | .01 | 55 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 26.65 | .02 | (a) | .07 | .09 | .04 | 1.43 | 1.47 | 25.27 | .12 | 432,235 | 1.32 | 1.32 | .07 | 1.33 | .06 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 25.27 | .17 | (a) | 2.36 | 2.53 | .02 | 1.44 | 1.46 | 26.34 | 10.35 | 472,720 | 1.33 | 1.34 | .68 | 1.34 | .68 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 18.74 | (.15 | ) | 3.84 | 3.69 | — | 1.76 | 1.76 | 20.67 | 20.33 | 5,085 | 2.13 | 2.13 | (.67 | ) | 2.23 | (.77 | ) | 41 | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 20.67 | (.10 | ) | 3.96 | 3.86 | .08 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 23.45 | 19.62 | 4,932 | 2.13 | 2.13 | (.29 | ) | 2.21 | (.37 | ) | 110 | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 23.45 | (.17 | )(a) | 2.62 | 2.45 | — | 4.60 | 4.60 | 21.30 | 10.71 | 4,441 | 2.16 | 2.16 | (.77 | ) | 2.21 | (.82 | ) | 55 | |||||||||||||||
2015 | 21.30 | (.16 | )(a) | .08 | (.08 | ) | — | 1.43 | 1.43 | 19.79 | (.67 | ) | 3,618 | 2.13 | 2.13 | (.74 | ) | 2.14 | (.75 | ) | 43 | |||||||||||||
2016 | 19.79 | (.02 | )(a) | 1.81 | 1.79 | — | 1.44 | 1.44 | 20.14 | 9.43 | 3,301 | 2.14 | 2.14 | (.12 | ) | 2.15 | (.13 | ) | 39 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 25.71 | .01 | 2.37 | 2.38 | — | — | — | 28.09 | 9.26 | †† | 1 | 1.16 | † | 1.16 | † | .08 | † | 4.82 | † | (3.58 | )† | 110 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 28.09 | .12 | (a) | 3.10 | 3.22 | — | 4.60 | 4.60 | 26.71 | 11.82 | 26,458 | 1.01 | 1.01 | .39 | 1.06 | .34 | 55 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 26.71 | .10 | (a) | .08 | .18 | .08 | 1.43 | 1.51 | 25.38 | .46 | 38,790 | 1.02 | 1.03 | .37 | 1.04 | .36 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 25.38 | .23 | (a) | 2.39 | 2.62 | .04 | 1.44 | 1.48 | 26.52 | 10.67 | 59,159 | 1.03 | 1.03 | .94 | 1.04 | .93 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 25.71 | .06 | 2.37 | 2.43 | — | — | — | 28.14 | 9.45 | †† | 1 | .84 | † | .84 | † | .42 | † | 4.43 | † | (3.17 | )† | 110 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 28.14 | .14 | (a) | 3.16 | 3.30 | — | 4.60 | 4.60 | 26.84 | 12.10 | 5,750 | .89 | .89 | .51 | .94 | .46 | 55 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 26.84 | .14 | (a) | .08 | .22 | .16 | 1.43 | 1.59 | 25.47 | .60 | 5,905 | .88 | .88 | .51 | .89 | .50 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||
2016 | 25.47 | .28 | (a) | 2.39 | 2.67 | .05 | 1.44 | 1.49 | 26.65 | 10.84 | 6,914 | .88 | .89 | 1.11 | .90 | 1.10 | 39 |
352 | 353 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Period | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Period | Return* | (in thousands) | Credits | Credits*** | Income | Expenses*** | Loss | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL RETURN FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | $14.10 | $.30 | $2.71 | $3.01 | $.30 | $— | $.30 | $16.81 | 21.46 | % | $532,551 | 1.32 | % | 1.32 | % | 1.79 | % | N/A | N/A | 32 | % | |||||||||||||
2013 | 16.81 | .27 | 1.99 | 2.26 | .34 | .24 | .58 | 18.49 | 13.77 | 664,054 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.45 | N/A | N/A | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 18.49 | .22 | (a) | 1.65 | 1.87 | .31 | .42 | .73 | 19.63 | 10.18 | 767,354 | 1.19 | 1.19 | 1.14 | N/A | N/A | 44 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 19.63 | .21 | (a) | (.68 | ) | (.47 | ) | .28 | .67 | .95 | 18.21 | (2.65 | ) | 784,281 | 1.18 | 1.18 | 1.05 | N/A | N/A | 40 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 18.21 | .23 | (a) | 1.26 | 1.49 | .27 | .43 | .70 | 19.00 | 8.36 | 845,726 | 1.19 | 1.19 | 1.27 | N/A | N/A | 63 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 13.88 | .18 | 2.65 | 2.83 | .18 | — | .18 | 16.53 | 20.49 | 10,872 | 2.02 | 2.02 | 1.09 | N/A | N/A | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 16.53 | .15 | 1.95 | 2.10 | .22 | .24 | .46 | 18.17 | 12.98 | 10,207 | 2.01 | 2.01 | .71 | N/A | N/A | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 18.17 | .07 | (a) | 1.61 | 1.68 | .16 | .42 | .58 | 19.27 | 9.29 | 10,016 | 1.97 | 1.97 | .36 | N/A | N/A | 44 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 19.27 | .06 | (a) | (.68 | ) | (.62 | ) | .06 | .67 | .73 | 17.92 | (3.44 | ) | 8,270 | 1.96 | 1.96 | .27 | N/A | N/A | 40 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 17.92 | .09 | (a) | 1.25 | 1.34 | .13 | .43 | .56 | 18.70 | 7.61 | 7,774 | 1.96 | 1.96 | .50 | N/A | N/A | 63 | |||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 17.62 | .09 | .95 | 1.04 | .17 | — | .17 | 18.49 | 5.89 | †† | 1 | 1.01 | † | 1.01 | † | 1.40 | † | 4.76 | %† | (2.35 | )%† | 32 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 18.49 | .29 | (a) | 1.60 | 1.89 | .32 | .42 | .74 | 19.64 | 10.34 | 2,106 | .78 | .78 | 1.46 | N/A | N/A | 44 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 19.64 | .29 | (a) | (.69 | ) | (.40 | ) | .31 | .67 | .98 | 18.26 | (2.24 | ) | 976 | .78 | .78 | 1.44 | N/A | N/A | 40 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 18.26 | .26 | (a) | 1.27 | 1.53 | .32 | .43 | .75 | 19.04 | 8.55 | 1,213 | .82 | .82 | 1.63 | N/A | N/A | 63 | |||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013(f) | 17.62 | .10 | .95 | 1.05 | .17 | — | .17 | 18.50 | 5.98 | †† | 1 | .82 | † | .82 | † | 1.48 | † | 4.35 | † | (2.05 | )† | 32 | †† | |||||||||||
2014 | 18.50 | .30 | (a) | 1.63 | 1.93 | .36 | .42 | .78 | 19.65 | 10.55 | 2,885 | .78 | .78 | 1.55 | N/A | N/A | 44 | |||||||||||||||||
2015 | 19.65 | .29 | (a) | (.70 | ) | (.41 | ) | .28 | .67 | .95 | 18.29 | (2.28 | ) | 30,644 | .77 | .77 | 1.47 | N/A | N/A | 40 | ||||||||||||||
2016 | 18.29 | .31 | (a) | 1.28 | 1.59 | .32 | .43 | .75 | 19.13 | 8.88 | 32,525 | .77 | .77 | 1.68 | N/A | N/A | 63 |
* | Calculated without sales charges. | |
** | Net of expenses waived or assumed (Note 3). | |
*** | The ratios do not include a reduction of expenses from cash balances maintained with the custodian | |
or from brokerage service arrangements (Note 1G). | ||
† | Annualized | |
†† | Not annualized | |
(a) | Based on average shares during the period. | |
(b) | Due to rounding, amount is less than .005 per share. | |
(c) | For the period August 1, 2016 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016. | |
(d) | For the period April 1, 2016 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2016. | |
(e) | For the period April 6, 2015 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2015. | |
(f) | For the period April 1, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013. | |
(g) | Prior to September 4, 2012, known as Value Fund. |
354 | See notes to financial statements | 355 |
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
First Investors Income Funds and First Investors Equity Funds
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments of the Cash Management Fund, Balanced Income Fund, Floating Rate Fund, Fund For Income, Government Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund and Strategic Income Fund, (each a series of First Investors Income Funds), and the Covered Call Strategy Fund, Equity Income Fund, Global Fund, Growth & Income Fund, Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund, International Fund, Opportunity Fund, Real Estate Fund, Select Growth Fund, Special Situations Fund and Total Return Fund (each a series of First Investors Equity Funds), as of September 30, 2016, the related statements of operations, the statements of changes in net assets, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated thereon. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of September 30, 2016, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. Where brokers have not replied to our confirmation requests, we have carried out other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
356 |
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Cash Management Fund, Balanced Income Fund, Floating Rate Fund, Fund For Income, Government Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund, Strategic Income Fund, Covered Call Strategy Fund, Equity Income Fund, Global Fund, Growth & Income Fund, Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund, International Fund, Opportunity Fund, Real Estate Fund, Select Growth Fund, Special Situations Fund and Total Return Fund, as of September 30, 2016, and the results of their operations, changes in their net assets, and their financial highlights for the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Tait, Weller & Baker LLP |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
November 28, 2016
357 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Trustees and Officers*
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
DISINTERESTED TRUSTEES | ||||
Susan E. Artmann (1954) | Trustee | Since 11/1/12 | 49 | None |
c/o First Investors Funds, | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Retired. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HSBC Insurance North America (2012-2013). | ||||
Mary J. Barneby (1952) | Trustee | Since 11/1/12 | 49 | None |
c/o First Investors Funds, | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Executive Officer, Girl Scouts of Connecticut (since October 2012); Executive Director of UBS Financial | ||||
Services, Inc. and Head of Stamford Private Wealth Office (2002-2012). | ||||
Charles R. Barton, III (1965) | Trustee | Since 1/1/06 | 49 | None |
c/o First Investors Funds, | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Operating Officer (since 2007), Board Director (since 1989, currently Ex-Officio) and Trustee (since 1994) | ||||
of The Barton Group/Barton Mines Corporation (mining and industrial abrasives distribution); President of Noe | ||||
Pierson Corporation (land holding and management services provider) (since 2004). |
358 |
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position(s) | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
DISINTERESTED TRUSTEES (continued) | ||||
Arthur M. Scutro, Jr. (1941) | Trustee and | Trustee since | 49 | None |
c/o First Investors Funds, | Chairman | 1/1/06 and | ||
Legal Department | Chairman | |||
40 Wall Street | since 1/1/13 | |||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
None/Retired | ||||
Mark R. Ward (1952) | Trustee | Since 1/1/10 | 49 | None |
c/o First Investors Funds, | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Self-employed, consultant (since 2008) |
*Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term with the Funds, until his/her successor is elected.
359 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Trustees and Officers* (continued)
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
OFFICER(S) WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES | ||||
William Lipkus (1964) | President | Since 2014 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors Funds, | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (since 2012), Treasurer (1999-2013), Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(1997-2013) and Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) of Foresters Financial Holding Company, Inc.; Direc- | ||||
tor (since 2007), Chairman (since 2012), Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(1998-2013) of Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc.; Director (since 2011), Chairman (since 2012), | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (1998-2013), Treasurer (1999-2013) and Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) of | ||||
Foresters Financial Services, Inc.; Chairman (since 2012), Director (since 2007), Chief Administrative Officer | ||||
(2012-2014) and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (1998-2013) of Foresters Investor Services, Inc.; Director | ||||
and Chairman (2012-2016), Vice President (1996-2014), Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (1996-2013) and | ||||
Chief Administrative Officer (2012-2014) of Foresters Life Insurance and Annuity Company; Board of Managers | ||||
and Chairman (since 2012) and Chief Financial Officer (2012-2013) of Foresters Investors Advisory Services, LLC | ||||
and Director (since 2015) of Foresters Equity Services, Inc.; Chairman and Director (since 2016) of Foresters Asset | ||||
Management, Inc.; Chairman and Director (since 2016) of Foresters Financial Investment Management Company | ||||
of Canada, Inc. | ||||
Joseph I. Benedek (1957) | Treasurer | Since 1988 | N/A | None |
c/o Foresters Investment | ||||
Management Company, Inc. | ||||
Raritan Plaza I | ||||
Edison, NJ 08837 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Treasurer of Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. | ||||
Mary Carty (1950) | Secretary | Since 2010 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors Funds, | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
General Counsel of Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. and various affiliated companies since | ||||
December 2012; Assistant Counsel of Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. (2010-2012). |
360 |
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
OFFICER(S) WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES (continued) | ||||
Marc S. Milgram (1957) | Chief | Since 2010 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors Funds, | Compliance | |||
Legal Department | Officer | |||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Compliance Officer of Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. |
361 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Annual Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements with Muzinich & Co., Inc. and Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC.
The First Investors Income Funds’ (the “Trust”) investment advisory agreements with the Trust’s investment adviser and, as applicable, sub-advisers, on behalf of each of the Trust’s funds, can remain in effect after an initial term of no greater than two years only if they are renewed at least annually thereafter (i) by the vote of the Trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of each fund and (ii) by the vote of a majority of the Trustees who are not parties to the advisory agreement (and sub-advisory agreement, as applicable) or “interested persons” of any party thereto (the “Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called specifically for the purpose of voting on such approval.
The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) has four regularly scheduled and two informal meetings each year and takes into account throughout the year matters bearing on the approval of the advisory agreement (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable). In particular, the Board and its standing committees also consider at each meeting at least certain of the factors that are relevant to the annual renewal of each fund’s advisory agreement (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable), including investment performance, sub-adviser updates and reviews, reports with respect to brokerage and portfolio transactions, portfolio turnover rates, compliance monitoring, and the services and support provided to each fund and its shareholders. In addition the Board meets with representatives of each sub-adviser in person at least once per year.
On April 21, 2016 (the “April Meeting”), the Independent Trustees met in person with senior management personnel of Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”), the Trust’s investment adviser, Trust counsel, independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees (“Independent Legal Counsel”) and others to give preliminary consideration to information bearing on the continuation of the advisory agreement (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) with respect to each fund. The primary purpose of the April Meeting was to ensure that the Independent Trustees had ample opportunity to consider matters they deemed relevant in determining whether to continue the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable), and to request any additional information they considered reasonably necessary to their deliberations. The Independent Trustees also met in executive session with Independent Legal Counsel on April 20, 2016 to consider the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) outside the presence of management. As part of the April Meeting, the Independent Trustees asked FIMCO to respond to certain additional questions prior to the contract approval meeting of the Board to be held on May 19, 2016 (the “May Meeting”). In
362 |
addition, Independent Legal Counsel, in conjunction with the Board, and personnel from FIMCO reviewed each sub-adviser’s response in connection with the request for information with respect to the applicable sub-advisory agreements and requested follow-up information or clarifications from each sub-adviser, as applicable, which was provided prior to the May Meeting.
At the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) between FIMCO and each of the following funds (each a “Fund” and collectively the “Funds”): Cash Management Fund, Floating Rate Fund, Fund For Income, Government Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund and Strategic Income Fund. In addition, at the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the sub-advisory agreements (each, a “Sub-Advisory Agreement” and collectively, the “Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with: (1) Muzinich & Co., Inc. (“Muzinich”) with respect to the Fund For Income and Floating Rate Fund; and (2) Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC (“Brandywine”) with respect to the International Opportunities Bond Fund. The Fund For Income, Floating Rate Fund and International Opportunities Bond Fund are collectively referred to as the “Sub-Advised Funds.”
In reaching its decisions to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds, the Board considered information furnished and discussed throughout the year at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings as well as a wide range of information provided specifically in relation to the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements for the April Meeting and May Meeting. Information furnished at Board and/or Committee meetings throughout the year included FIMCO’s analysis of each Fund’s investment performance and the performance of the sub-advisers to the respective Sub-Advised Funds, presentations given by representatives of FIMCO, Muzinich and Brandywine and various reports on compliance and other services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates.
In preparation for the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, the Independent Trustees requested and received information compiled by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (formerly, Lipper, Inc.) (hereinafter, “Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, that included, among other things: (1) the investment performance over various time periods and the fees and expenses of each Fund as compared to a comparable group of funds as determined by Lipper (“Peer Group”); and (2) comparative information on each Fund’s volatility versus total return.
363 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Additionally, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, FIMCO furnished, and the Board considered, information concerning various aspects of its operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates to the Funds, including investment advisory and administrative services to the Funds including, as applicable, services in connection with selecting, overseeing and evaluating the sub-advisers; (2) the actual management fees paid by each Fund to FIMCO; (3) the costs of providing services to each Fund and the profitability of FIMCO and its affiliate, Foresters Investor Services, Inc. (“FIS”), the Funds’ affiliated transfer agent, from the relationship with each Fund; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to FIMCO or its affiliates as a result of the relationship with each Fund. FIMCO also provided, and the Board considered, an analysis of the overall profitability of the First Investors mutual fund business that included various entities affiliated with FIMCO as well as comparative profitability information based on analysis performed by FIMCO of the financial statements of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers. The Board also considered FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s personnel and methods, including the education, experience of key personnel, and the number of their advisory and analytical personnel; general information regarding the compensation of FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s advisory personnel; FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s investment management process; FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s compliance program; the time and attention of FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s personnel devoted to the management of the Funds; FIMCO and each sub-adviser’s cybersecurity practices and related controls and business continuity plans; and material pending, threatened or settled litigation involving FIMCO and each sub-adviser, and any ongoing or completed audits, investigations or examinations by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Board also considered information provided by FIMCO on management’s initiatives for increasing Fund assets and new product development, which included enhanced sales and marketing efforts (including selling Fund shares through independent channels and increasing the size of the sales force); continuing efforts as deemed practicable to reduce expenses and improve performance of the Funds; and improving the efficiency of back-office operations and services. In addition to evaluating, among other considerations, the written information provided by FIMCO, the Board also evaluated the answers to questions posed by the Board to representatives of FIMCO.
In addition, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, Muzinich and Brandywine furnished, and the Board reviewed, information concerning various aspects of their respective operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by Muzinich and Brandywine to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (2) the
364 |
sub-advisory fee rates charged by Muzinich and Brandywine and a comparison of those fee rates to the fee rates of Muzinich and Brandywine for providing advisory services to other investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable, with an investment mandate similar to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (3) profitability and/or financial information provided by Muzinich and Brandywine; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to Muzinich and Brandywine as a result of the relationship with each applicable Sub-Advised Fund. The Board also considered FIMCO’s representations that it found the sub-adviser responses to the information request in connection with the renewal of the Sub-Advisory Agreements to be satisfactory and raising no issues of general concern.
In considering the information and materials described above, the Independent Trustees took into account management style, investment strategies and prevailing market conditions. Moreover, the Independent Trustees received assistance from and met separately with Independent Legal Counsel during both the April Meeting and May Meeting and were provided with a written description of their statutory responsibilities and the legal standards that are applicable to approvals of advisory agreements (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable). Although the Advisory Agreement for all of the Funds and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds were considered at the same Board meeting, the Independent Trustees addressed each Fund separately during the April Meeting and May Meeting.
Based on all of the information presented, the Board, including a majority of its Independent Trustees, determined on a Fund-by-Fund basis that the fees charged under the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement are reasonable in relation to the services that are provided under each Agreement. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance in reaching its conclusions and determinations with respect to the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreements and different Trustees may have given different weight to different factors. Although not meant to be all-inclusive, the following describes some of the factors that were considered by the Board in deciding to approve the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreements with Muzinich and Brandywine.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In examining the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by FIMCO, the Board recognized that FIMCO is dedicated to providing investment management services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex and that, unlike many other mutual fund managers, FIMCO is not in the business of providing management services to hedge funds, pension funds or private accounts.
365 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
In this connection, the Board was advised that certain key FIMCO personnel provide separately managed account services to a FIMCO-affiliated investment adviser, but that these personnel spend most of their time serving their FIMCO clients. As a result, the Board considered that FIMCO’s personnel devote substantially all of their time to serving the funds in the First Investors fund complex. The Board also considered management’s explanation regarding the significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders, which are primarily shareholders in the broad middle market.
The Board noted that FIMCO has undertaken extensive responsibilities as manager of the Funds, including: (1) the provision of investment advice to the Funds; (2) implementing policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with each Fund’s investment objectives and policies; (3) the review of brokerage arrangements; (4) oversight of general portfolio compliance with applicable laws; (5) the provision of certain administrative services to the Funds, including fund accounting; (6) the implementation of Board directives as they relate to the Funds; and (7) evaluating and monitoring any sub-advisers on an ongoing basis, including, but not limited to, monitoring each sub-adviser’s investment performance, evaluating each sub-adviser’s compliance program on an annual basis and monitoring investments for compliance purposes, including monitoring each sub-adviser’s soft dollar practices (as applicable), portfolio allocation and best execution. The Board noted that FIMCO provided the same sorts of administrative and other services, except for direct management of the portfolio, for the Sub-advised Funds as it does for the other funds that do not employ a sub-adviser. The Board noted that FIMCO provides not only advisory services, but historically also has provided certain administrative personnel and services that many other advisers do not provide without imposition of separate fees. The Board also noted the steps that FIMCO has taken to encourage strong performance, including providing significant incentives to portfolio managers and analysts based on Fund performance. In addition, the Board considered information regarding the overall financial strength of FIMCO and its affiliates and the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided to the Funds.
The Board also considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by FIMCO’s affiliates, including transfer agency and distribution services. The Board took into account the fact that FIS is dedicated to providing transfer agency services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex. As a result, FIS can tailor its processes and services to satisfy the needs of the Funds’ shareholder base. The Board noted that the Funds’ shares are distributed primarily through Foresters Financial Services, Inc. (“FFS”), which is an affiliate of FIMCO.
366 |
Furthermore, the Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the investment management services provided by Muzinich and Brandywine to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Board considered Muzinich’s and Brandywine’s investment management process in managing the applicable Sub-Advised Funds and the experience and capability of its personnel responsible for the portfolio management of the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Board also considered information regarding the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided by each sub-adviser. Additionally, with respect to the Sub-Advised Funds, the Board considered the differences in fees paid by each applicable Fund to FIMCO and the fees paid by FIMCO to each sub-adviser, as well as representations by FIMCO that these fee differentials are warranted by its ongoing services and assumption of risks.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to each Fund by FIMCO and the applicable Sub-Advised Funds by Muzinich and Brandywine were appropriate and consistent with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements, as applicable, and supported approval of the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
Investment Performance
The Board placed significant emphasis on the investment performance of each of the Funds. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions held at prior Board or Committee meetings, as applicable, particular attention was given to the performance information compiled by Lipper. In particular, the Board reviewed the total return of each Fund over the most recent calendar year (“1-year period”) and the annualized total return over the most recent three calendar year period (“3-year period”) and five calendar year period (“5-year period”). In addition, the Board considered the total return information provided by FIMCO for each Fund through April 30, 2016. The Board also reviewed the annual yield of each Fund for each of the past five calendar years (or shorter period as applicable). With regard to the total return and yield information, the Board considered the total return and yield of each Fund on a percentile and quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group. For purposes of the data provided, the first quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the highest performance or yield, as applicable, and the fifth quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the lowest performance or yield. The Board also considered FIMCO’s representations that it monitors to ensure portfolio managers invest in a manner consistent with the mandate for the Fund or Funds they manage.
On a Fund-by-Fund basis, the total return performance reports indicated, and the Board noted, that: (i) the Cash Management Fund fell within the fourth quintile
367 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
for the 1-year period, 3-year period and 5-year period; (ii) the Floating Rate Fund fell within the second quintile for the 1-year period (the only year of information provided due to its short operating history); (iii) the Fund For Income fell within the top three quintiles for each of the performance periods shown by Lipper; (iv) the Government Fund fell within the third quintile for the 1-year period and the fourth quintile for the 3-year period and 5-year period; (v) the International Opportunities Bond Fund fell within the fifth quintile for the 1-year period and fourth quintile for the 3-year period (noting that the Fund had not been in operation beyond those time periods); (vi) the Investment Grade Fund fell within the top three quintiles for each of the performance periods shown by Lipper; and (vii) the Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund and Strategic Income Fund fell within the fourth quintile for the 1-year period (the only year of information provided due to their short operating history). The Trustees also considered that, in the current market and interest-rate environment, comparative information regarding performance and contractual fee rates of money market funds such as the Cash Management Fund is of relatively limited utility.
The Board also reviewed the yields of the Funds and noted that the yield for: (i) the Cash Management Fund fell outside of the top three quintiles for each of the past five calendar years; (ii) the Floating Rate Fund fell outside of the top three quintiles for each of the past two calendar years, which was the only information available due to its short operating history; (iii) the Fund For Income fell within one of the top three quintiles for two of the past five calendar years; (iv) the Government Fund fell within one of the top two quintiles for each of the past five calendar years; (v) the International Opportunities Bond Fund fell within the second quintile for each of the past three calendar years, which was the only information available due to its short operating history; (vi) the Investment Grade Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for each of the past five calendar years; and (vii) the Strategic Income Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for one of the past two calendar years, which was the only information available due to its short operating history. The Board also noted that the yield for the short one-year operating history of the Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund fell within the second quintile. Moreover, the Board considered the volatility versus total return data provided by Lipper as well as FIMCO’s representation that it believes that the Funds use a more conservative investment style than many of their peers.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the investment performance of each Fund was either (a) acceptable or better, or (b) subject to reasonable steps to monitor or address certain periods of underperformance.
368 |
Fund Expenses, Costs of Services, Economies of Scale and Related Benefits
Management Fees and Expenses. The Board also gave substantial consideration to the fees payable under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement as well as under the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds.
The Board reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s contractual management fee rate (at common asset levels) and actual management fee rate (which included the effect of any fee waivers) as a percentage of average net assets to other funds in its Peer Group. In this regard, the Board considered the contractual and actual management fees of each Fund on a quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group and noted the relative position of each Fund within the Peer Group. The Board also considered that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but also certain administrative personnel to the Funds under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement and that many other advisers do not provide such administrative personnel under their advisory agreements and that FIMCO also provides certain administrative services without the imposition of a separate fee. The Board considered that FIMCO informed the Board that it intends to: (i) extend, on a voluntary basis, the existing total expense cap limitation for the Cash Management Fund until May 31, 2017; and (ii) extend, on a voluntary basis, the existing management fee caps for the Fund For Income, Government Fund and Investment Grade Fund respectively until May 31, 2017. The Board also noted that it had previously approved the continuation of the contractual total expense caps on the Floating Rate Fund and Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund until January 31, 2017. The Board also considered that, with respect to the Cash Management Fund, FIMCO was waiving all of its management fees and reimbursing a portion of other expenses to avoid a negative return for shareholders due to the historically low interest rate environment. In particular, the Board noted that: (i) the Cash Management Fund’s contractual management fee was in the fourth quintile and actual management fee was in the first quintile of its Peer Group; (ii) the Floating Rate Fund’s contractual and actual management fees were in the first quintile of its Peer Group; (iii) the contractual and actual management fees for the Fund For Income, Government Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund and Investment Grade Fund were outside of the top three quintiles of their respective Peer Groups; (iv) the Limited Duration High Quality Bond Fund’s contractual management fee was in the fifth quintile and actual management fee was in the third quintile of its Peer Group; and (v) the Strategic Income Fund’s contractual management fee was in the first quintile and actual management fee was in the second quintile of its Peer Group.
The Board also reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s Class A share total expense ratio, taking into account FIMCO’s expense waivers (as
369 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
applicable), and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees (i.e., fees other than management, transfer agency and 12b-1/non-12b-1 fees) to other funds in its Peer Group, including on a quintile basis. In particular, the Board noted that: (i) the total expense ratio for each Fund except the Cash Management Fund and Strategic Income Fund was not in the top three quintiles of their respective Peer Groups; and (ii) the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees for each Fund except the Cash Management Fund, Floating Rate Fund and Strategic Income Fund was not in the top three quintiles of their respective Peer Groups. In considering the level of the total expense ratio and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees, the Board took into account management’s explanation that: (i) the average account size of many of the First Investors funds is small by comparison to the industry average account size and that funds with small average account sizes generally have higher expenses ratios than funds with larger average account sizes; (ii) there are significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders; (iii) overall Fund expenses cover certain check-writing and wiring privileges for Cash Management Fund shareholders at no additional cost; and (iv) Lipper expense comparisons do not take into account the size of a fund complex, and as a result, in most cases the First Investors funds are compared to funds in complexes that are much larger than First Investors. The Board also noted that Lipper’s customized expense groups tend to be fairly small in number and the funds included in the Peer Group generally change from year to year, thereby introducing an element of randomness that affects comparative results each year. While recognizing the limitations inherent in Lipper’s methodology, the Board believed that the data provided by Lipper was a generally appropriate measure of comparative expenses.
In considering the sub-advisory fee rates charged by and costs and profitability of Muzinich and Brandywine with regard to the respective Sub-Advised Funds, the Board noted that FIMCO pays Muzinich or Brandywine, as the case may be, a sub-advisory fee from its own advisory fee rather than each Fund paying Muzinich or Brandywine a fee directly. The Board also considered arrangements pursuant to which Muzinich (but not its Sub-Advised Funds) pays a portion of its sub-advisory fee to a solicitor that introduced Muzinich to FIMCO. Muzinich and Brandywine provided, and the Board reviewed, information comparing the fees charged by Muzinich and Brandywine for services to the respective Sub-Advised Funds versus the fee rates of Muzinich and Brandywine for providing advisory services to other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable. Based on a review of this information, the Board noted that the fees charged by Muzinich and Brandywine, as the case may be, for services to each applicable Sub-Advised Fund appeared competitive to the fees Muzinich and
370 |
Brandywine charge to their other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable.
The foregoing comparisons assisted the Trustees by providing them with a basis for evaluating each Fund’s management fee and expense ratio on a relative basis and the Board concluded that each Fund’s management fees appeared reasonable in relation to the services and benefits provided to each Fund.
Profitability. The Board reviewed the materials it received from FIMCO regarding its revenues and costs in providing investment management and certain administrative services to the Funds. In particular, the Board considered the analysis of FIMCO’s profitability with respect to each Fund, calculated for the year ended December 31, 2015, as well as overall profitability information relating to the past five calendar years. The Board also considered the information provided by FIMCO comparing the profitability of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers as analyzed by FIMCO based on publicly available financial statements and noted FIMCO’s analysis that its profit margin is significantly lower than the average of, and lower overall than any of, such publicly-traded managers. In reviewing the profitability information, the Board also considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO and its affiliates as a result of their relationship with the Funds, which are discussed below. Based on the information provided, the Board also noted that FIMCO operates the Cash Management Fund and Strategic Income Fund at a loss. The Board acknowledged that, as a business matter, FIMCO was entitled to earn reasonable profits for its services to the Funds and concluded that the level of profitability to FIMCO of its contractual arrangements with each Fund did not appear so high as to call into question the appropriateness of the fees paid to FIMCO by any Fund or otherwise to preclude the proposed continuation of the Advisory Agreement for any of the Funds. The Board also considered the profitability and/or financial information provided by Muzinich and Brandywine.
Economies of Scale. With respect to whether economies of scale are realized by FIMCO and the extent to which any economies of scale are reflected in the level of management fee rates charged, the Board considered that the Advisory Agreement fee schedule for each Fund, except the Strategic Income Fund and Cash Management Fund, includes breakpoints to account for management economies of scale as each Fund’s assets increase. With respect to the Strategic Income Fund and Cash Management Fund, the Board concluded that the fee structure is appropriate at current asset levels.
“Fall Out ” or Ancillary Benefits. The Board considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO, Muzinich and Brandywine as a result of their
371 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
relationship with the Funds. In that regard, the Board considered the fact that FIMCO and Brandywine may receive research from broker-dealers that execute brokerage transactions for the funds in the First Investors fund complex. However, the Board noted that FIMCO and Brandywine must select brokers based on each Fund’s requirements for seeking best execution. The Board considered the fact that Muzinich does not engage in any soft dollar arrangements. The Board also considered the profits earned or losses incurred by FIS and the income received by FFS as a result of FIMCO’s management of the First Investors funds.
* * * |
In summary, based on all relevant information and factors, none of which was individually determinative of the outcome, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
372 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Annual Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements with Wellington Management Company, LLP, Smith Group Asset Management, LP and Vontobel Asset Management, Inc.
The First Investors Equity Funds’ (the “Trust”) investment advisory agreements with the Trust’s investment adviser and, as applicable, sub-advisers, on behalf of each of the Trust’s funds, can remain in effect after an initial term of no greater than two years only if they are renewed at least annually thereafter (i) by the vote of the Trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of each fund and (ii) by the vote of a majority of the Trustees who are not parties to the advisory agreement (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) or “interested persons” of any party thereto (the “Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called specifically for the purpose of voting on such approval.
The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) has four regularly scheduled and two informal meetings each year and takes into account throughout the year matters bearing on the approval of the advisory agreement (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable). In particular, the Board and its standing committees also consider at each meeting at least certain of the factors that are relevant to the annual renewal of each fund’s advisory agreement (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable), including investment performance, sub-adviser updates and reviews, reports with respect to brokerage and portfolio transactions, use of soft dollars for research products and services, portfolio turnover rates, compliance monitoring, and the services and support provided to each fund and its shareholders. In addition, the Board meets with representatives of each sub-adviser in person at least once per year.
On April 21, 2016 (the “April Meeting”), the Independent Trustees met in person with senior management personnel of Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”), the Trust’s investment adviser, Trust counsel, independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees (“Independent Legal Counsel”) and others to give preliminary consideration to information bearing on the continuation of the advisory agreement (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) with respect to each fund. The primary purpose of the April Meeting was to ensure that the Independent Trustees had ample opportunity to consider matters they deemed relevant in determining whether to continue the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable), and to request any additional information they considered reasonably necessary to their deliberations. The Independent Trustees also met in executive session with Independent Legal Counsel on April 20, 2016 to consider the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) outside the presence of management. As part of the April Meeting, the Independent Trustees asked FIMCO to respond to certain additional questions prior to the contract
373 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
approval meeting of the Board to be held on May 19, 2016 (the “May Meeting”). In addition, Independent Legal Counsel, in conjunction with the Board, and personnel from FIMCO reviewed each sub-adviser’s response in connection with the request for information with respect to the applicable sub-advisory agreements and requested follow-up information or clarifications from each sub-adviser, as applicable, which was provided prior to the May Meeting.
At the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) between FIMCO and each of the following funds (each a “Fund” and collectively the “Funds”): Equity Income Fund, Global Fund, Growth & Income Fund, International Fund, Opportunity Fund, Real Estate Fund, Select Growth Fund, Special Situations Fund and Total Return Fund. In addition, at the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the sub-advisory agreements (each a “Sub-Advisory Agreement” and collectively the “Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with: (1) Wellington Management Company, LLP (“WMC”) with respect to the Global Fund; (2) Smith Group Asset Management, LP (“Smith Group”) with respect to the Select Growth Fund; and (3) Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. (“Vontobel”) with respect to the International Fund. The Global Fund, Select Growth Fund and International Fund are collectively referred to as the “Sub-Advised Funds.”
In reaching its decisions to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds, the Board considered information furnished and discussed throughout the year at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings as well as a wide range of information provided specifically in relation to the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements for the April Meeting and May Meeting. Information furnished at Board and/or Committee meetings throughout the year included FIMCO’s analysis of each Fund’s investment performance and the performance of the sub-advisers to the respective Sub-Advised Funds, presentations given by representatives of FIMCO, WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel and various reports on compliance and other services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates.
In preparation for the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, the Independent Trustees requested and received information compiled by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (formerly, Lipper, Inc.) (hereinafter, “Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, that included, among other things: (1) the investment performance over various time periods and the fees and expenses of each Fund as compared to a comparable group of funds as determined by Lipper (“Peer Group”); and (2) comparative information on each Fund’s volatility versus total return.
374 |
Additionally, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, FIMCO furnished, and the Board considered, information concerning various aspects of its operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates to the Funds, including investment advisory and administrative services to the Funds including, as applicable, services in connection with selecting, overseeing and evaluating the sub-advisers; (2) the actual management fees paid by each Fund to FIMCO; (3) the costs of providing services to each Fund and the profitability of FIMCO and its affiliate, Foresters
Investor Services, Inc. (“FIS”), the Funds’ affiliated transfer agent, from the relationship with each Fund; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to FIMCO or its affiliates as a result of the relationship with each Fund. FIMCO also provided, and the Board considered, an analysis of the overall profitability of the First Investors mutual fund business that included various entities affiliated with FIMCO as well as comparative profitability information based on analysis performed by FIMCO of the financial statements of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers. The Board also considered FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s personnel and methods, including the education, experience of key personnel, and the number of their advisory and analytical personnel; general information regarding the compensation of FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s advisory personnel; FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s investment management process; FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s compliance program; the time and attention of FIMCO’s and each sub-adviser’s personnel devoted to the management of the Funds; FIMCO and each sub-adviser’s cybersecurity practices and related controls and business continuity plans; and material pending, threatened or settled litigation involving FIMCO and each sub-adviser, and any ongoing or completed audits, investigations or examinations by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Board also considered information provided by FIMCO on management’s initiatives for increasing Fund assets and new product development, which included enhanced sales and marketing efforts (including selling Fund shares through independent channels and increasing the size of the sales force); continuing efforts as deemed practicable to reduce expenses and improve performance of the Funds; and improving the efficiency of back-office operations and services. In addition to evaluating, among other considerations, the written information provided by FIMCO, the Board also evaluated the answers to questions posed by the Board to representatives of FIMCO.
In addition, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel furnished, and the Board reviewed, information concerning various aspects of their
375 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
respective operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (2) the sub-advisory fee rates charged by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel and a comparison of those fee rates to the fee rates of WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel for providing advisory services to other investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable, with an investment mandate similar to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (3) profitability and/or financial information provided by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel as a result of the relationship with each applicable Sub-Advised Fund. The Board also considered FIMCO’s representations that it found the sub-adviser responses to the information request in connection with the renewal of the Sub-Advisory Agreements to be satisfactory and raising no issues of general concern.
In considering the information and materials described above, the Independent Trustees took into account management style, investment strategies and prevailing market conditions. Moreover, the Independent Trustees received assistance from and met separately with Independent Legal Counsel during both the April Meeting and May Meeting and were provided with a written description of their statutory responsibilities and the legal standards that are applicable to approvals of advisory agreements (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable). Although the Advisory Agreement for all of the Funds and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds were considered at the same Board meeting, the Independent Trustees addressed each Fund separately during the April Meeting and May Meeting.
Based on all of the information presented, the Board, including a majority of its Independent Trustees, determined on a Fund-by-Fund basis that the fees charged under the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement are reasonable in relation to the services that are provided under each Agreement. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance in reaching its conclusions and determinations with respect to the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreements and different Trustees may have given different weight to different factors. Although not meant to be all-inclusive, the following describes some of the factors that were considered by the Board in deciding to approve the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreements with WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In examining the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by FIMCO, the Board recognized that FIMCO is dedicated to providing investment management
376 |
services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex and that, unlike many other mutual fund managers, FIMCO is not in the business of providing management services to hedge funds, pension funds or private accounts. In this connection, the Board was advised that certain key FIMCO personnel provide separately managed account services to a FIMCO-affiliated investment adviser, but that these personnel spend most of their time serving their FIMCO clients. As a result, the Board considered that FIMCO’s personnel devote substantially all of their time to serving the funds in the First Investors fund complex. The Board also considered management’s explanation regarding the significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders, which are primarily shareholders in the broad middle market.
The Board noted that FIMCO has undertaken extensive responsibilities as manager of the Funds, including: (1) the provision of investment advice to the Funds; (2) implementing policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with each Fund’s investment objectives and policies; (3) the review of brokerage arrangements; (4) oversight of general portfolio compliance with applicable laws; (5) the provision of certain administrative services to the Funds, including fund accounting; (6) the implementation of Board directives as they relate to the Funds; and (7) evaluating and monitoring any sub-advisers on an ongoing basis, including, but not limited to, monitoring each sub-adviser’s investment performance, evaluating each sub-adviser’s compliance program on an annual basis and monitoring investments for compliance purposes, including monitoring each sub-adviser’s soft dollar practices, portfolio allocation and best execution. The Board also noted that FIMCO provided the same sorts of administrative and other services, except for direct management of the portfolio, for the Sub-advised Funds as it does for the other funds that do not employ a sub-adviser. The Board noted that FIMCO provides not only advisory services, but historically also has provided certain administrative personnel and services that many other advisers do not provide without imposition of separate fees. The Board also noted the steps that FIMCO has taken to encourage strong performance, including providing significant incentives to portfolio managers and analysts based on Fund performance. In addition, the Board considered information regarding the overall financial strength of FIMCO and its affiliates and the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided to the Funds.
The Board also considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by FIMCO’s affiliates, including transfer agency and distribution services. The Board took into account the fact that FIS is dedicated to providing transfer agency services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex. As a result, FIS can tailor its processes and services to satisfy the
377 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
needs of the Funds’ shareholder base. The Board noted that the Funds’ shares are distributed primarily through Foresters Financial Services, Inc. (“FFS”), which is an affiliate of FIMCO.
Furthermore, the Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the investment management services provided by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Board considered WMC’s, Smith Group’s and Vontobel’s investment management process in managing the applicable Sub-Advised Funds and the experience and capability of their respective personnel responsible for the portfolio management of the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Board also considered information regarding the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided by each sub-adviser. Additionally, with respect to the Sub-Advised Funds, the Board considered the differences in fees paid by each applicable Fund to FIMCO and the fees paid by FIMCO to each sub-adviser, as well as representations by FIMCO that these fee differentials are warranted by its ongoing services and assumption of risks.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to each Fund by FIMCO and the applicable Sub-Advised Funds by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel were appropriate and consistent with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements, as applicable, and supported approval of the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
Investment Performance
The Board placed significant emphasis on the investment performance of each of the Funds. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions held at prior Board or Committee meetings, as applicable, particular attention was given to the performance information compiled by Lipper. In particular, the Board reviewed the performance of each Fund over the most recent calendar year (“1-year period”) and the annualized performance over the most recent three calendar year period (“3-year period”) and five calendar year period (“5-year period”). In addition, the Board considered the performance information provided by FIMCO for each Fund through April 30, 2016. With regard to the performance information, the Board considered the performance of each Fund on a percentile and quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group. For purposes of the performance data provided, the first quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the highest performance and the fifth quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the lowest performance. The Board also considered FIMCO’s representations that it
378 |
monitors to ensure portfolio managers invest in a manner consistent with the mandate for the Fund or Funds they manage.
On a Fund-by-Fund basis, the performance reports indicated, and the Board noted, that each Fund except the Real Estate Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for at least one of the performance periods provided by Lipper. In particular, the Board noted that: (i) the Equity Income Fund, Global Fund, Select Growth Fund and Special Situations Fund fell within the top three quintiles for the 1-year period, 3-year period and 5-year period; (ii) the Growth & Income Fund fell within the top three quintiles for the 5-year period; (iii) the International Fund fell within the first quintile for the 1-year period and 5-year period; (iv) the Opportunity Fund fell within the first quintile for the 1- year period, 3-year period and 5-year period; and (v) the Total Return Fund fell in the top three quintiles for the 3-year period and 5-year period. With respect to the Real Estate Fund, the Board noted that the Fund was relatively new with less than one calendar year of performance history and, as a result, Lipper did not provide any comparative performance information for the various time periods. The Board also considered the volatility versus total return data provided by Lipper as well as FIMCO’s representation that it believes that the Funds use a more conservative investment style than many of their peers.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the investment performance of each Fund was either (a) acceptable or better, or (b) subject to reasonable steps to monitor or address certain periods of underperformance.
Fund Expenses, Costs of Services, Economies of Scale and Related Benefits
Management Fees and Expenses. The Board also gave substantial consideration to the fees payable under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement as well as under the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds.
The Board reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s contractual management fee rate (at common asset levels) and actual management fee rate (which included the effect of any fee waivers) as a percentage of average net assets to other funds in its Peer Group. In this regard, the Board considered the contractual and actual management fees of each Fund on a quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group and noted the relative position of each Fund within the Peer Group. The Board also considered that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but also certain administrative personnel to the Funds under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement and that many other advisers do not provide such administrative personnel under their advisory agreements and that FIMCO also provides certain administrative services without the imposition of a separate fee. The Board also considered that FIMCO informed the Board that it intends to extend, on a voluntary basis, the existing
379 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
management fee cap for the Special Situations Fund and Global Fund until May 31, 2017. In particular, the Board noted that: (i) the contractual and actual management fees for all of the Funds except the Equity Income Fund, Global Fund, International Fund and Total Return Fund were in the top three quintiles of their respective Peer Groups; (ii) the Equity Income Fund’s and International Fund’s contractual management fee was in the fourth quintile and actual management fee was in the fifth quintile of their respective Peer Groups; (iii) the Global Fund’s contractual and actual management fees were in the fourth quintile of its Peer Group; and (iv) the Total Return Fund’s contractual and actual management fees were in the fifth quintile of its Peer Group.
The Board also reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s Class A share total expense ratio, taking into account FIMCO’s expense waivers (as applicable), and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees (i.e., fees other than management, transfer agency and 12b-1/non-12b-1 fees) to other funds in its Peer Group, including on a quintile basis. In particular, the Board noted that: (i) the total expense ratio for each Fund except the Growth & Income Fund, Opportunity Fund, Real Estate Fund and Special Situations Fund was not in the top three quintiles of their respective Peer Groups; and (ii) the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees was in the top three quintiles for all of the Funds except the Equity Income Fund, Global Fund and International Fund. In considering the level of the total expense ratio and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees, the Board took into account management’s explanation that: (i) the Funds have average account sizes that are relatively small compared with the industry average and that funds with small average account sizes generally have higher expense ratios than funds with larger average account sizes; (ii) there are significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders; and (iii) Lipper expense comparisons do not take into account the size of a fund complex, and as a result, in certain cases the First Investors funds are compared to funds in complexes that are much larger than First Investors. The Board also noted that Lipper’s customized expense groups tend to be fairly small in number and the funds included in the Peer Group generally change from year to year, thereby introducing an element of randomness that affects comparative results each year. While recognizing the limitations inherent in Lipper’s methodology, the Board believed that the data provided by Lipper was a generally appropriate measure of comparative expenses.
In considering the sub-advisory fee rates charged by and costs and profitability of WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel with regard to the respective Sub-Advised Funds, the Board noted that FIMCO pays WMC, Smith Group or Vontobel, as the case may
380 |
be, a sub-advisory fee from its own advisory fee rather than each Fund paying WMC, Smith Group or Vontobel a fee directly. The Board also considered an arrangement pursuant to which Smith Group and Vontobel (but not the Sub-Advised Funds) each pays a portion of its sub-advisory fee to a solicitor that introduced each such subadviser to FIMCO. WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel provided, and the Board reviewed, information comparing the fees charged by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel for services to the respective Sub-Advised Funds versus the fee rates of WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel for providing advisory services to other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable. Based on a review of this information, the Board noted that the fees charged by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel, as the case may be, for services to each applicable Sub-Advised Fund appeared competitive to the fees WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel charge to their other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable.
The foregoing comparisons assisted the Trustees by providing them with a basis for evaluating each Fund’s management fee and expense ratio on a relative basis and the Board concluded that each Fund’s management fees appeared reasonable in relation to the services and benefits provided to each Fund.
Profitability. The Board reviewed the materials it received from FIMCO regarding its revenues and costs in providing investment management and certain administrative services to the Funds. In particular, the Board considered the analysis of FIMCO’s profitability with respect to each Fund, calculated for the year ended December 31, 2015, as well as overall profitability information relating to the past five calendar years. The Board also considered the information provided by FIMCO comparing the profitability of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers as analyzed by FIMCO based on publicly available financial statements and noted FIMCO’s analysis that its profit margin is significantly lower than the average of, and lower overall than any of, such publicly-traded managers. In reviewing the profitability information, the Board also considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO and its affiliates as a result of their relationship with the Funds, which are discussed below. The Board acknowledged that, as a business matter, FIMCO was entitled to earn reasonable profits for its services to the Funds and concluded that the level of profitability to FIMCO of its contractual arrangements with each Fund did not appear so high as to call into question the appropriateness of the fees paid to FIMCO by any Fund or otherwise to preclude the proposed continuation of the Advisory Agreement for any of the Funds. The Board also considered the profitability and/or financial information provided by WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel.
381 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Economies of Scale. With respect to whether economies of scale are realized by FIMCO and the extent to which any economies of scale are reflected in the level of management fee rates charged, the Board considered that the Advisory Agreement fee schedule for each Fund includes breakpoints to account for management economies of scale as each Fund’s assets increase.
“Fall Out ” or Ancillary Benefits. The Board considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO, WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel as a result of their relationship with the Funds. In that regard, the Board considered the fact that FIMCO, WMC, Smith Group and Vontobel may receive research from broker-dealers that execute brokerage transactions for the funds in the First Investors fund complex. However, the Board noted that FIMCO and the sub-advisers must select brokers based on each Fund’s requirements for seeking best execution. The Board also considered the profits earned or losses incurred by FIS and the income received by FFS as a result of FIMCO’s management of the First Investors funds.
* * * |
In summary, based on all relevant information and factors, none of which was individually determinative of the outcome, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
382 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees
(unaudited)
COVERED CALL STRATEGY FUND
Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. and the Sub-Advisory Agreement with Ziegler Capital Management LLC with respect to the First Investors Covered Call Strategy Fund
At the February 18, 2016 meeting (the “February Meeting”) of the Board of Trustees (the “Board” or the “Trustees”) of the First Investors Equity Funds (the “Trust”), the Board, including a majority of Board members who are not interested persons of the Trust under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Independent Trustees”), discussed and approved, for the new First Investors Covered Call Strategy Fund (the “New Fund”), the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) with Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”) and the sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Ziegler Capital Management, LLC (“ZCM,” and together with FIMCO, the “Advisers”).
The Trustees were provided with preliminary materials relating to the New Fund by FIMCO and ZCM initially in connection with a Board meeting held on November 19, 2015 (the “November Meeting”) and then more detailed materials by the Advisers in advance of and at the February Meeting. The Trustees also met in person with senior officers of FIMCO, Trust counsel, independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees (“Independent Legal Counsel”) and others to receive information on, and discuss the approval of, the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement. In addition, the Trustees met in person with representatives of ZCM at the November Meeting and again telephonically at the February Meeting. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the approval of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement are discussed below.
In making their determinations, the Trustees took into account management style, investment strategies, investment philosophy and process, ZCM’s past performance and the Advisers’ personnel that would be serving the New Fund. In evaluating the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Trustees also reviewed information provided by the Advisers, including the terms of such Agreements and information regarding fee arrangements, including the structure of the advisory fee and sub-advisory fee, the method of computing fees, and the frequency of payment of fees. The Trustees also reviewed information comparing the New Fund’s advisory fee rate and projected total expenses with a peer group of other similar funds compiled by Broadridge, an independent provider of investment company data. In addition, the Trustees reviewed, among other things, information regarding ZCM’s compliance program, financial condition, insurance coverage and brokerage practices.
After discussion and consideration among themselves, and with the Advisers, Trust counsel and Independent Legal Counsel, including during an executive session with
383 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
COVERED CALL STRATEGY FUND
Independent Legal Counsel held the day before the February Meeting, the Trustees concluded as follows with respect to the New Fund:
• The nature and extent of the investment advisory services to be provided to the New Fund by the Advisers were consistent with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, respectively.
• The prospects for satisfactory investment performance of the New Fund were reasonable;
• Shareholders of the New Fund may benefit from economies of scale in the future as assets grow due to breakpoints included in the fee schedule for the Advisory Agreement;
• Shareholders of the New Fund may benefit from FIMCO’s agreement that total expenses of the New Fund would be capped under an expense limitation agreement pursuant to which FIMCO or the New Fund’s transfer agent, an affiliate of FIMCO, will limit total annual operating expenses (subject to certain exceptions) to a certain level for each class of shares of the New Fund;
• The cost of services to be provided by the Advisers to the New Fund and the profits realized by the Advisers and their respective affiliates, if any, from their respective relationship with the New Fund would be assessed after the New Fund has commenced operations when the Trustees first consider the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement; and
• The Advisers may receive certain “fall out” or ancillary benefits by obtaining research and other services from broker-dealers that execute brokerage transactions for the New Fund.
* * * |
Based on all relevant information and factors, none of which was individually determinative of the outcome, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, concluded that the approval of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement was in the best interests of the New Fund and its shareholders and unanimously approved such Agreements.
384 |
Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. and the Sub-Advisory Agreement with Ziegler Capital Management LLC with respect to the First Investors Life Series Covered Call Strategy Fund
At the February 18, 2016 meeting (the “February Meeting”) of the Board of Trustees (the “Board” or the “Trustees”) of the First Investors Life Series Funds (the “Trust”), the Board, including a majority of Board members who are not interested persons of the Trust under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Independent Trustees”), discussed and approved, for the new First Investors Life Series Covered Call Strategy Fund (the “New Fund”), the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) with Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”) and the sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Ziegler Capital Management, LLC (“ZCM,” and together with FIMCO, the “Advisers”).
The Trustees were provided with preliminary materials relating to the New Fund by FIMCO and ZCM initially in connection with a Board meeting held on November 19, 2015 (the “November Meeting”) and then more detailed materials by the Advisers in advance of and at the February Meeting. The Trustees also met in person with senior officers of FIMCO, Trust counsel, independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees (“Independent Legal Counsel”) and others to receive information on, and discuss the approval of, the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement. In addition, the Trustees met in person with representatives of ZCM at the November Meeting and again telephonically at the February Meeting. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the approval of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement are discussed below.
In making their determinations, the Trustees took into account management style, investment strategies, investment philosophy and process, ZCM’s past performance and the Advisers’ personnel that would be serving the New Fund. In evaluating the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Trustees also reviewed information provided by the Advisers, including the terms of such Agreements and information regarding fee arrangements, including the structure of the advisory fee and sub-advisory fee, the method of computing fees, and the frequency of payment of fees. The Trustees also reviewed information comparing the New Fund’s advisory fee rate and projected total expenses with a peer group of other similar funds compiled by Broadridge, an independent provider of investment company data. In addition, the Trustees reviewed, among other things, information regarding ZCM’s compliance program, financial condition, insurance coverage and brokerage practices.
385 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
COVERED CALL STRATEGY FUND
After discussion and consideration among themselves, and with the Advisers, Trust counsel and Independent Legal Counsel, including during an executive session with Independent Legal Counsel held the day before the February Meeting, the Trustees concluded as follows with respect to the New Fund:
• The nature and extent of the investment advisory services to be provided to the New Fund by the Advisers were consistent with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, respectively.
• The prospects for satisfactory investment performance of the New Fund were reasonable;
• Shareholders of the New Fund may benefit from economies of scale in the future as assets grow due to breakpoints included in the fee schedule for the Advisory Agreement;
• The cost of services to be provided by the Advisers to the New Fund and the profits realized by the Advisers and their respective affiliates, if any, from their respective relationship with the New Fund would be assessed after the New Fund has commenced operations when the Trustees first consider the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement; and
• The Advisers may receive certain “fall out” or ancillary benefits by obtaining research and other services from broker-dealers that execute brokerage transactions for the New Fund.
* * * |
Based on all relevant information and factors, none of which was individually determinative of the outcome, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, concluded that the approval of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement was in the best interests of the New Fund and its shareholders and unanimously approved such Agreements.
386 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees
(unaudited)
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES FUND
Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreement with Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. and the Sub-Advisory Agreement with Wellington Management Company LLP with respect to the First Investors Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund
At the May 19, 2016 meeting (the “May Meeting”) of the Board of Trustees (the “Board” or the “Trustees”) of the First Investors Equity Funds (the “Trust”), the Board, including a majority of Board members who are not interested persons of the Trust under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Independent Trustees”), discussed and approved, for the new First Investors Hedged U.S. Equity Opportunities Fund (the “New Fund”), the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) with Foresters Investment Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”) and the sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Wellington Management Company LLP (“WMC,” and together with FIMCO, the “Advisers”).
The Trustees were provided with preliminary materials relating to the New Fund by FIMCO and WMC initially in connection with a Board meeting held on February 18, 2016 (the “February Meeting”) and then more detailed materials by the Advisers in advance of and at the May Meeting. The Trustees also met in person with senior officers of FIMCO, Trust counsel, independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees (“Independent Legal Counsel”) and others to receive information on, and discuss the approval of, the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement. In addition, the Trustees met in person with representatives of WMC at the February Meeting. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the approval of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement are discussed below.
In making their determinations, the Trustees took into account management style, investment strategies, investment philosophy and process, WMC’s past performance and the Advisers’ personnel that would be serving the New Fund. In evaluating the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Trustees also reviewed information provided by the Advisers, including the terms of such Agreements and information regarding fee arrangements, including the structure of the advisory fee and sub-advisory fee, the method of computing fees, and the frequency of payment of fees. The Trustees also reviewed information comparing the New Fund’s advisory fee rate and projected total expenses with a peer group of other similar funds compiled by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (formerly, Lipper, Inc.) (hereinafter, “Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data. In addition, the Trustees reviewed, among other things, information regarding WMC’s compliance program, financial condition, insurance coverage and brokerage practices.
387 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
HEDGED U.S. EQUITY OPPORTUNITIES FUND
After discussion and consideration among themselves, and with the Advisers, Trust counsel and Independent Legal Counsel, including during an executive session with Independent Legal Counsel held the day before the May Meeting, the Trustees concluded as follows with respect to the New Fund:
• The nature and extent of the investment advisory services to be provided to the New Fund by the Advisers were consistent with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, respectively.
• The prospects for satisfactory investment performance of the New Fund were reasonable;
• Shareholders of the New Fund may benefit from economies of scale in the future as assets grow due to breakpoints included in the fee schedule for the Advisory Agreement;
• The projected contractual management fee, actual management fee and total expense ratio for the New Fund was below the median of the New Fund’s assumed Lipper peer group;
• Shareholders of the New Fund may benefit from FIMCO’s agreement that total expenses of the New Fund would be capped under an expense limitation agreement pursuant to which FIMCO or the New Fund’s transfer agent, an affiliate of FIMCO, will limit total annual operating expenses (subject to certain exceptions) to a certain level for each class of shares of the New Fund;
• The cost of services to be provided by the Advisers to the New Fund and the profits realized by the Advisers and their respective affiliates, if any, from their respective relationship with the New Fund would be assessed after the New Fund has commenced operations when the Trustees first consider the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement; and
• The Advisers may receive certain “fall out” or ancillary benefits by obtaining research and other services from broker-dealers that execute brokerage transactions for the New Fund.
* * * |
Based on all relevant information and factors, none of which was individually determinative of the outcome, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, concluded that the approval of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement was in the best interests of the New Fund and its shareholders and unanimously approved such Agreements.
388 |
Shareholder Information | ||
Investment Adviser | Subadviser | |
Foresters Investment Management | (Select Growth Fund) | |
Company, Inc. | Smith Asset Management Group, L.P. | |
40 Wall Street | 100 Crescent Court | |
New York, NY 10005 | Dallas, TX 75201 | |
Subadviser | Underwriter | |
(Covered Call Strategy Fund) | Foresters Financial Services, Inc. | |
Ziegler Capital Management, LLC | 40 Wall Street | |
70 W. Madison Street | New York, NY 10005 | |
Chicago, IL 60602 | ||
Custodian | ||
Subadviser | The Bank of New York Mellon | |
(Floating Rate Fund and Fund For Income) | 225 Liberty Street | |
Muzinich & Co., Inc. | New York, NY 10286 | |
450 Park Avenue | ||
New York, NY 10022 | Transfer Agent | |
Foresters Investor Services, Inc. | ||
Subadviser | Raritan Plaza I – 8th Floor | |
(Global Fund and Hedged U.S. Equity | Edison, NJ 08837-3620 | |
Opportunity Fund) | ||
Wellington Management Company, | Independent Registered Public | |
LLP | Accounting Firm | |
280 Congress Street | Tait, Weller & Baker LLP | |
Boston, MA 02210 | 1818 Market Street | |
Philadelphia, PA 19103 | ||
Subadviser | ||
(International Fund) | Legal Counsel | |
Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. | K&L Gates LLP | |
1540 Broadway | 1601 K Street, N.W. | |
New York, NY 10036 | Washington, D.C. 20006 | |
Subadviser | ||
(International Opportunities Bond Fund) | ||
Brandywine Global Investment | ||
Management, LLC | ||
2929 Arch Street | ||
Philadelphia, PA 19104 |
389 |
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to vote proxies relating to a portfolio’s securities is available, without charge, upon request by calling toll free 1-800-423-4026 or can be viewed online or downloaded from the EDGAR database on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) internet website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available, without charge, upon request in writing or by calling 1-800-423-4026 and on the SEC’s internet website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Funds file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC on Form N-Q for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Funds’ Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; and may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The schedule of portfolio holdings is available, without charge, upon request in writing or by calling 1-800-423-4026.
390 |
NOTES |
391 |
NOTES |
392 |
NOTES |
393 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics
As of September 30, 2016, the Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer. There were no revisions made to the code of ethics during the fiscal year October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2016.
For the year ended September 30, 2016, there were no waivers granted from a provision of the code of ethics.
A copy of the Registrant's code of ethics is filed under Item 12(a)(1).
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
During the reporting period the Registrant's Board determined that it had at least one "audit committee financial expert" serving on its audit committee. Arthur M. Scutro, Jr. and Mark R. Ward were the "audit committee financial experts" during all or part of the period and were considered to be "independent" as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Fiscal Year Ended | |||||||
September 30, | |||||||
----------------- | |||||||
2016 | 2015 | ||||||
---- | ---- | ||||||
(a) Audit Fees | |||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ | 228,100 | $ | 207,550 | |||
(b) Audit-Related Fees | |||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | |||
(c) Tax Fees | |||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ | 43,600 | $ | 38,250 | |||
Nature of services: tax returns preparation and tax compliance | |||||||
(d) All Other Fees | |||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
(e)(1) Audit committee's pre-approval policies
The Charter of the Audit Committee requires the Audit Committee (a) to pre-approve, and to recommend to the full Board, the selection, retention or termination of the independent auditors to
provide audit, review or attest services to the First Investors Funds (“Funds”) and, in connection therewith, evaluate the independence of the auditors and to obtain the auditors’ specific representations as to their independence; (b) to pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided to the Funds by the independent auditor; and (c) to pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided by the Funds’ independent auditor to the Funds’ investment adviser or to any entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Funds’ investment adviser and that provides ongoing services to the Funds, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds. The Audit Committee has not adopted pre-approval policies or procedures to permit the services in (b) and (c) above to be pre-approved by other means.
(e)(2) None, or 0%, of the services relating to the Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees paid by the Registrant and Related Entities disclosed above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (which permits audit committee approval after the start of the engagement with respect to services other than audit review or attest services, if certain conditions are satisfied).
(f) Not Applicable
(g) Aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Registrant's accountant for services rendered to the Registrant and the Registrant's investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant for the two fiscal years ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 were $177,650 and $169,000, respectively.
(h) Not Applicable
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants | |
Not applicable | |
Item 6. Schedule of Investments | |
(a) Schedule is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of | |
this Form. | |
(b) Not applicable |
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies & Procedures for | |
Closed-End Management Investment Companies | |
Not applicable |
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies | |
Not applicable |
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management | |
Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers | |
Not applicable |
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There were no material changes to the procedure by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant's Board of Trustees.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Registrant's President and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effective, based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) There were no changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
(a)(1) Code of Ethics - Filed herewith
(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 - Filed herewith
(b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 - Filed herewith
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
First Investors Income Funds | |
By /S/ | WILLIAM LIPKUS |
William Lipkus | |
President and Principal Executive Officer | |
Date: November 28, 2016 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By /S/ | WILLIAM LIPKUS |
William Lipkus | |
President and Principal Executive Officer | |
By /S/ | JOSEPH I. BENEDEK |
Joseph I. Benedek | |
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | |
Date: November 28, 2016 |