UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 |
-------- |
FORM N-CSR |
-------- |
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT FILE NUMBER 811-3967 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
40 Wall Street |
New York, NY 10005 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
Joseph I. Benedek |
First Investors Management Company, Inc. |
Raritan Plaza I |
Edison, NJ 08837-3620 |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: |
1-212-858-8000 |
DATE OF FISCAL YEAR END: SEPTEMBER 30 |
DATE OF REPORTING PERIOD: SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 |
Item 1. | Reports to Stockholders |
The annual report to stockholders follows |
FOREWORD |
This report is for the information of the shareholders of the Funds. It is the policy of each Fund described in this report to mail only one copy of a Fund’s prospectus, annual report, semi-annual report and proxy statements to all shareholders who share the same mailing address and share the same last name and have invested in a Fund covered by the same document. You are deemed to consent to this policy unless you specifically revoke this policy and request that separate copies of such documents be mailed to you. In such case, you will begin to receive your own copies within 30 days after our receipt of the revocation. You may request that separate copies of these disclosure documents be mailed to you by writing to us at: Administrative Data Management Corp., Raritan Plaza I, Edison, NJ 08837-3620 or calling us at 1-800-423-4026.
You may obtain a free prospectus for any of the Funds by contacting your representative, calling 1-800-423-4026, writing to us at the following address: First Investors Corporation, 40 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005, or by visiting our website at www.firstinvestors.com. You should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a Fund carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund, and should be read carefully before investing.
An investment in a Fund is not a bank deposit and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency. Although the Cash Management Fund seeks to preserve a net asset value at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in it, just as it is possible to lose money by investing in any of the other Funds. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
A Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) for any of the Funds may also be obtained, without charge, upon request by calling 1-800-423-4026, writing to us at our address or by visiting our website listed above. The SAI contains more detailed information about the Funds, including information about its Trustees.
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Cash Management Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 0.0% for Class A shares, Class B shares and Institutional Class shares. The Fund maintained a $1.00 net asset value per share for each class of shares throughout the year. The Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013.
Yields on money market funds and the instruments that they invest in have remained at record lows — essentially where they have been for the last few years. The Federal Reserve has had an extremely accommodative interest rate policy since late 2008 and has indicated a willingness to maintain extraordinarily low short-term interest rates until certain economic conditions improve. Market expectations have varied on when this may occur, but it appears that the current policy will remain basically intact through 2014.
Furthermore, the money-market industry has been reviewing proposed changes to the federal regulations governing money market funds that the Securities and Exchange Commission is considering implementing. At this time, it is not known what form the final version of these regulations will take. It is expected that there will be a transition period of some time before any changes are put in place.
First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”), the Fund’s investment advisor, continued to absorb expenses of the Fund and waived management fees in an effort to avoid a negative yield to its shareholders. FIMCO expects this situation to continue and consequently, the yield to shareholders should be at or near zero for the foreseeable future.
Although money-market funds in general are relatively conservative vehicles, there can be no assurance that the Fund will be able to maintain a stable net-asset value of $1.00 per share. Money-market mutual funds are neither insured nor guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
1 |
Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses (unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
As a mutual fund shareholder, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including a sales charge (load) on purchase payments (on Class A shares only) and a contingent deferred sales charge on redemptions (on Class B shares only); and (2) ongoing costs, including advisory fees; distribution and service fees (12b-1); and other expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 in each Fund at the beginning of the period, April 1, 2013, and held for the entire six-month period ended September 30, 2013. The calculations assume that no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.
Actual Expenses Example:
These amounts help you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from the Fund’s actual return, and the “Expenses Paid During Period” shows the dollar amount that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the Fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.
To estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period, simply divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number given for your Fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period”.
Hypothetical Expenses Example:
These amounts provide information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio for each class of shares of a Fund, and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as front-end or contingent deferred sales charges (loads or account fees that are charged to certain types of accounts, such as an annual custodial fee of $15 for certain IRA accounts and certain other retirement accounts or an annual custodial fee of $30 for 403(b) custodial accounts (subject to exceptions and certain waivers as described in the Funds’ Statement of Additional Information)). Therefore, the hypothetical expenses example is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
2 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 0.10% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $0.50 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,024.57 | $0.51 | |
Class B Shares | 0.10% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $0.50 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,024.57 | $0.51 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.15% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $0.75 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,024.32 | $0.76 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived and/or assumed. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total market value of investments.
3 |
Portfolio of Investments
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | Interest | ||||||
Amount | Security | Rate | * | Value | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—46.2% | |||||||
Fannie Mae: | |||||||
$ 1,800M | 10/1/13 | 0.12 | % | $ 1,800,000 | |||
7,777M | 10/2/13 | 0.08 | 7,776,984 | ||||
2,500M | 11/1/13 | 0.11 | 2,499,763 | ||||
1,000M | 12/18/13 | 0.09 | 1,001,413 | ||||
4,650M | 3/19/14 | 0.06 | 4,648,712 | ||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
1,300M | 10/16/13 | 0.10 | 1,299,946 | ||||
3,000M | 10/16/13 | 0.11 | 2,999,869 | ||||
2,000M | 10/23/13 | 0.10 | 1,999,878 | ||||
2,208M | 11/20/13 | 0.08 | 2,207,755 | ||||
2,700M | 11/22/13 | 0.08 | 2,699,688 | ||||
700M | 12/18/13 | 0.10 | 699,848 | ||||
3,000M | 12/27/13 | 0.04 | 2,999,710 | ||||
Freddie Mac: | |||||||
10,700M | 10/22/13 | 0.09 | 10,699,438 | ||||
5,700M | 10/22/13 | 0.10 | 5,699,667 | ||||
4,000M | 10/28/13 | 0.05 | 3,999,865 | ||||
5,820M | 1/14/14 | 0.07 | 5,818,812 | ||||
1,648M | 3/3/14 | 0.07 | 1,647,510 | ||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $60,498,858) | 60,498,858 | ||||||
CORPORATE NOTES—23.3% | |||||||
3,000M | Abbott Laboratories, 10/28/2013 (a) | 0.10 | 2,999,775 | ||||
6,000M | Coca-Cola Co., 2/27/2014 (a) | 0.19 | 5,995,281 | ||||
5,000M | Honeywell International, Inc., 1/30/2014 (a) | 0.12 | 4,997,983 | ||||
5,000M | Philip Morris International, Inc., 2/13/2014 (a) | 0.09 | 4,998,312 | ||||
5,500M | Proctor & Gamble Co., 12/12/2013 (a) | 0.06 | 5,499,340 | ||||
6,000M | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 10/30/2013 (a) | 0.08 | 5,999,613 | ||||
Total Value of Corporate Notes (cost $30,490,304) | 30,490,304 | ||||||
VARIABLE AND FLOATING RATE NOTES—22.1% | |||||||
5,000M | BP Capital Markets, PLC, 12/6/2013 | 0.88 | 5,006,267 | ||||
Federal Farm Credit Bank: | |||||||
1,000M | 10/15/13 | 0.22 | 1,000,035 | ||||
4,500M | 3/18/14 | 0.08 | 4,499,793 |
4 |
Principal | Interest | ||||||
Amount | Security | Rate | * | Value | |||
VARIABLE AND FLOATING RATE NOTES (continued) | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$ 1,850M | 11/8/13 | 0.14 | $ 1,850,039 | ||||
5,000M | 12/20/13 | 0.15 | 5,000,444 | ||||
5,700M | Mississippi Business Finance Corp. | ||||||
(Chevron USA, Inc.) 12/1/2030 | 0.06 | 5,700,000 | |||||
5,835M | Valdez, Alaska Marine Terminal Rev. | ||||||
(Exxon Pipeline Co., Project B), 12/1/2033 | 0.06 | 5,835,000 | |||||
Total Value of Variable and Floating Rate Notes (cost $28,891,578) | 28,891,578 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—7.3% | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills: | |||||||
4,500M | 10/3/13 | 0.08 | 4,499,980 | ||||
5,000M | 1/9/14 | 0.06 | 4,999,236 | ||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Obligations (cost $9,499,216) | 9,499,216 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $129,379,956)** | 98.9 | % | 129,379,956 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.1 | 1,464,263 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $130,844,219 |
* | The interest rates shown are the effective rates at the time of purchase by the Fund. The interest |
rates shown on floating rate notes are adjusted periodically; the rates shown are the rates in effect | |
at September 30, 2013. | |
** | Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is the same. |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
5 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
September 30, 2013
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | $ | — | $ | 60,498,858 | $ | — | $ | 60,498,858 | ||||
Corporate Notes | — | 30,490,304 | — | 30,490,304 | ||||||||
Variable and Floating Rate Notes: | ||||||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 11,535,000 | — | 11,535,000 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 12,350,311 | — | 12,350,311 | ||||||||
Corporate Notes | — | 5,006,267 | — | 5,006,267 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 9,499,216 | — | 9,499,216 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 129,379,956 | $ | — | $ | 129,379,956 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
6 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
GOVERNMENT FUND
Dear Investor:
We are pleased to send you the First Investors Government Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was –2.3% for Class A shares and –3.1% for Class B shares, including dividends of 31.9 cents per share on Class A shares and 24.1 cents per share on Class B shares. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was –1.8% for Advisor Class shares and –1.5% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 15.2 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 15.7 cents per share on Institutional Class shares. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
The Fund changed its benchmark from the Bank of America Merrill Lynch GNMA Index to the Citigroup U.S. Government/Mortgage Index midway through the period under review. This change was instituted to give investors broader exposure to the U.S. government fixed-income sector.
During the review period, long-term interest rates began climbing upwards from historically low levels due to market concerns that the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) would taper — or decrease — its stimulus program.
Key economic indicators, including stronger housing and jobs-related data, further convinced the market that the Fed’s monetary policy would become less accommodative. Treasury yields rose to their highest level in two years and fixed-income sectors came under pressure due to a potential “great rotation” into equities.
Towards the end of the review period, the Fed provided some relief to the market as it announced that its stimulus tapering plans were on hold. Reviewing benchmark U.S. Treasury yields, the two-year U.S. Treasury note yield — which is anchored by the Fed’s very accommodative monetary policy — rose 8 basis points (0.08%), ending the period at 0.32%. In contrast, the 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield rose sharply from 1.63% to 2.61%.
The broad U.S. bond market returned –1.77%, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch; the Treasury market returned –2.54%, with 10 year and longer Treasury securities returning –10.32%, due to rising long-term interest rates; and the broad mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) market returned –1.20%.
Within the MBS market, 30-year Ginnie Mae (“GNMA”) mortgages returned –1.96% and 30-year Fannie Mae mortgages returned –1.12% as GNMA performance was negatively affected by the lack of foreign-investor demand. Lower coupon mortgages returned –3.53% as investors shunned these bonds due to their interest rate sensitivity. Lastly, U.S. agency securities returned –1.38%.
7 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
The Fund outperformed its benchmark, the Citigroup U.S. Government/Mortgage Index, during the period under review. The Fund’s performance was mainly driven by an underweight in Treasury securities and no exposure to maturities 10 years and longer. An overweight in higher coupon agency MBS over lower coupon agency MBS and selective reduction of the Fund’s GNMA exposure also enhanced performance.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
* Effective December 3, 2012, Rodwell Chadehumbe became Co-Portfolio Manager of the Government Fund.
8 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GOVERNMENT FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.08% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 983.13 | $5.37 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.66 | $5.47 | |
Class B Shares | 1.87% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 979.64 | $9.28 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.69 | $9.45 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.95% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 982.87 | $4.72 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.31 | $4.81 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.68% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 984.64 | $3.38 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.66 | $3.45 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total value of investments.
9 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GOVERNMENT FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Government Fund (Class A shares), the Citigroup U.S. Government/Mortgage Index and the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch GNMA Master Index†.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | (2.29%) | (3.06%) | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 3.96% | 3.22% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 3.78% | 3.17% | (1.75%) | (1.54%) |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | (7.89%) | (6.86%) | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 2.73% | 2.87% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 3.17% | 3.19% | (1.75%) | (1.54%) |
S.E.C. 30-Day Yield*** | 1.55% | .89% | 1.80% | 2.06% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Government Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/03 with theoretical investments in the Citigroup U.S. Government/Mortgage Index/the BofA Merrill Lynch GNMA Master Index (the “Indices”). The Citigroup U.S. Government/Mortgage Index is an unmanaged index that is a combination of the Citigroup U.S. Government Index and the Citigroup Mortgage Index. The Citigroup U.S. Government Index tracks the performance of the U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government-sponsored indices within the Citigroup U.S. Broad Investment Grade Bond Index. The Citigroup Mortgage Index tracks the performance of the mortgage component of the Citigroup U.S. Broad Investment Grade Bond Index, which is comprised of 30- and 15-year GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC pass-throughs and FNMA and FHLMC balloon mortgages. The BofA
10 |
Merrill Lynch GNMA Master Index is a market capitalization-weighted index of securities backed by mortgage pools of the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). It is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (7.99%), 2.61% and 2.99%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 1.43%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (7.00%), 2.72% and 2.97%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 0.76%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (5.94%) and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 0%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (1.67%) and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 1.92%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Citigroup, Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
** The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations).
† We have added a comparison to the Citigroup Government/Mortgage Index this fiscal year since it more closely reflects the performance of the securities in which the Fund invests. After this fiscal year we will not show a comparison to the BofA Merrill Lynch GNMA Master Index.
*** The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2013.
11 |
Portfolio of Investments
GOVERNMENT FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | |||||||
SECURITIES—75.5% | |||||||
Fannie Mae—29.8% | |||||||
$14,266M | 2.5%, 11/1/2027 – 9/1/2028 (a) | $ 14,388,641 | |||||
22,855M | 3%, 8/1/2022 – 10/16/2028 (a) | 23,802,505 | |||||
21,967M | 3.5%, 10/1/2025 – 8/1/2042 (a) | 22,914,787 | |||||
23,745M | 4%, 8/1/2026 – 10/1/2041 | 25,054,567 | |||||
12,189M | 4.5%, 11/1/2040 – 8/1/2041 | 13,150,352 | |||||
4,453M | 5%, 8/1/2039 – 11/1/2039 | 4,836,464 | |||||
4,219M | 5.5%, 7/1/2033 – 10/1/2039 | 4,622,098 | |||||
108,769,414 | |||||||
Freddie Mac—3.8% | |||||||
4,604M | 2.5%, 1/1/2028 | 4,647,380 | |||||
2,277M | 3.5%, 9/1/2032 | 2,409,936 | |||||
6,344M | 4%, 11/1/2040 | 6,730,174 | |||||
13,787,490 | |||||||
Government National Mortgage Association I | |||||||
Program—41.9% | |||||||
11,600M | 4%, 7/15/2040 – 6/15/2042 | 12,483,634 | |||||
27,142M | 4.5%, 9/15/2033 – 9/15/2040 | 29,479,821 | |||||
47,084M | 5%, 6/15/2033 – 6/15/2040 | 52,012,684 | |||||
25,155M | 5.5%, 3/15/2033 – 10/15/2039 | 28,117,825 | |||||
22,964M | 6%, 3/15/2031 – 5/15/2040 | 25,638,255 | |||||
1,883M | 6.5%, 6/15/2034 – 3/15/2038 | 2,122,421 | |||||
2,607M | 7%, 6/15/2023 – 4/15/2034 | 2,923,784 | |||||
152,778,424 | |||||||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $268,935,562) | 275,335,328 | ||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—11.8% | |||||||
Fannie Mae: | |||||||
7,000M | 0.875%, 10/26/2017 | 6,906,585 | |||||
21,000M | 1.875%, 9/18/2018 | 21,252,105 | |||||
5,000M | 1.625%, 11/27/2018 | 4,985,260 | |||||
4,400M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 1%, 2/15/2028 (b) | 4,205,291 | |||||
5,000M | Freddie Mac, 3.75%, 3/27/2019 | 5,508,980 | |||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $42,887,156) | 42,858,221 |
12 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—5.8% | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes: | |||||||
$ 4,000M | 1%, 5/31/2018 | $ 3,949,220 | |||||
12,000M | 1.375%, 6/30/2018 | 12,032,340 | |||||
5,000M | 1.5%, 8/31/2018 | 5,033,790 | |||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Obligations (cost $20,971,153) | 21,015,350 | ||||||
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—3.6% | |||||||
Fannie Mae—2.3% | |||||||
8,041M | 3%, 2/25/2024 | 8,240,744 | |||||
Freddie Mac—1.3% | |||||||
4,722M | 3%, 8/15/2039 | 5,004,820 | |||||
Total Value of Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (cost $13,506,521) | 13,245,564 | ||||||
COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | |||||||
SECURITIES—3.3% | |||||||
Fannie Mae—2.0% | |||||||
2,965M | 2.27%, 1/1/2023 | 2,783,718 | |||||
4,370M | 2.96%, 11/1/2018 – 5/1/2022 | 4,419,411 | |||||
7,203,129 | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.—1.3% | |||||||
5,000M | Multi Family Structured Pass Through, 2.13%, 1/25/2019 | 5,008,245 | |||||
Total Value of Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $12,779,915) | 12,211,374 | ||||||
CORPORATE BONDS—1.1% | |||||||
Financials | |||||||
4,311M | Excalibur One 77B, LLC, 1.491%, 1/1/2025 (cost $4,288,874) | 4,106,785 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $363,369,181) | 101.1 | % | 368,772,622 | ||||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (1.1 | ) | (4,134,867) | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $364,637,755 |
(a) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis |
(see Note 1G). | |
(b) | Denotes a step bond (a bond that steps up to incremental interest rates at designated dates). |
13 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
September 30, 2013
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | $ | — | $ | 275,335,328 | $ | — | $ | 275,335,328 | ||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 42,858,221 | — | 42,858,221 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 21,015,350 | — | 21,015,350 | ||||||||
Collateralized Mortgage | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 13,245,564 | — | 13,245,564 | ||||||||
Commercial Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 12,211,374 | — | 12,211,374 | ||||||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 4,106,785 | — | 4,106,785 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | — | $ | 368,772,622 | $ | — | $ | 368,772,622 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry classification for the portfolio. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
14 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Dear Investor:
We are pleased to send you the First Investors Investment Grade Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was –1.1% for Class A shares and –1.8% for Class B shares, including dividends of 38.3 cents per share on Class A shares and 31.9 cents on Class B shares. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was –2.5% for Advisor Class shares and –2.4% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 19.2 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 19.8 cents per share on Institutional Class shares. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
The Fund invests in investment grade fixed income securities. The majority of the Fund’s assets were invested in investment grade corporate bonds. The Fund also had as much as 3% of its assets invested in high yield securities.
During the review period, long-term interest rates began climbing upwards from historically low levels due to market concerns that the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) would taper — or decrease — its stimulus program.
Key economic indicators, including stronger housing and jobs related data, provided further conviction to the market that the Fed’s monetary policy would become less accommodative. Treasury yields rose to their highest level in two years and fixed-income sectors came under pressure due to a potential “great rotation” into equities.
Towards the end of the review period, the Fed provided some relief to the market as it announced that its stimulus tapering plans were on hold. Reviewing benchmark U.S. Treasury yields, the two-year U.S. Treasury note yield — which is anchored by the Fed’s very accommodative monetary policy — rose 8 basis points (0.08%), ending the period at 0.32%. In contrast, the 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield rose sharply from 1.63% to 2.61%.
The broad U.S. bond market returned –1.77%, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Riskier fixed-income sectors had very strong performance, predominantly those that provide less interest-rate sensitivity. Consequently, high-yield — or “junk” bonds — returned 7.09%, while investment-grade corporate bonds returned –1.27%. Higher-quality sectors had negative returns. The broad mortgage-backed securities market returned –1.20%. The Treasury market returned –2.54%, with the 10 year and longer Treasury securities returning –10.32%, due to rising long-term interest rates.
The negative return of the corporate bond market during the review period was predominantly the result of rising interest rates. Modestly tighter bond spreads offset some of the interest rate-related losses. The review period began with continued confidence
15 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
in the financial strength of corporate issuers. Deleveraging of corporate balance sheets, credit availability and accommodative monetary policy supported a favorable outlook for corporate credit. However, the positive tone was offset by fears of the Fed tapering its stimulus program and increased shareholder-friendly activity by issuers, including share repurchases, dividend increases and mergers and acquisitions. In the last month of the review period, the Fed’s decision not to taper its stimulus program caused a rally in the bond market and increased demand for corporate credit, which tightened spreads.
The Fund outperformed the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index during the review period. It also benefited from an overweight in BBB-rated corporate bonds, which had the highest returns during the review period. The Fund’s underweight in corporate bonds with maturities greater than 10 years — which were negatively impacted by rising long-term Treasury yields — further benefited performance during the review period. This was partially offset by the Fund’s underweight in corporate bonds with maturities ranging from 1–3 years, which were less sensitive to interest-rate risk.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
16 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.05% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 975.47 | $5.20 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.81 | $5.32 | |
Class B Shares | 1.90% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 971.35 | $9.39 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.54 | $9.60 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.95% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 975.33 | $4.70 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.31 | $4.81 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.66% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 976.32 | $3.27 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.76 | $3.35 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total value of investments.
17 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Investment Grade Fund (Class A shares) and the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | (1.10%) | (1.82%) | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 8.34% | 7.58% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 4.42% | 3.78% | (2.53%) | (2.37%) |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | (6.81%) | (5.62%) | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 7.07% | 7.28% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 3.80% | 3.78% | (2.53%) | (2.37%) |
S.E.C. 30-Day Yield*** | 2.31% | 1.67% | 2.55% | 2.84% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Investment Grade Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/03 with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index (the “Index”). The Index includes publicly-issued, fixed-rate, non-convertible investment grade dollar-denominated, S.E.C.-registered corporate debt having at least one year to maturity and an outstanding par value of at least $250 million. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that
18 |
shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (6.91%), 6.95% and 3.68%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 2.21%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (5.72%), 7.13% and 3.66%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 1.56%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (6.70%) and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 0.19%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (2.48%) and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 2.73%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
** The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations).
*** The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2013.
19 |
Portfolio of Investments
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
CORPORATE BONDS—98.1% | |||||||
Aerospace/Defense—.3% | |||||||
$1,800M | BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 4.95%, 6/1/2014 (a) | $ 1,846,107 | |||||
Agriculture—.6% | |||||||
2,725M | Cargill, Inc., 6%, 11/27/2017 (a) | 3,143,456 | |||||
Automotive—1.9% | |||||||
2,000M | Daimler Finance NA, LLC, 2.95%, 1/11/2017 (a) | 2,073,086 | |||||
4,000M | General Motors Co., 3.5%, 10/2/2018 (a) | 4,010,000 | |||||
4,100M | Johnson Controls, Inc., 5%, 3/30/2020 | 4,501,218 | |||||
10,584,304 | |||||||
Chemicals—2.8% | |||||||
5,000M | CF Industries, Inc., 7.125%, 5/1/2020 | 5,869,685 | |||||
4,000M | Dow Chemical Co., 4.25%, 11/15/2020 | 4,190,696 | |||||
5,000M | LyondellBasell Industries NV, 6%, 11/15/2021 | 5,715,975 | |||||
15,776,356 | |||||||
Consumer Durables—.4% | |||||||
2,300M | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4.7%, 8/15/2020 | 2,453,737 | |||||
Energy—10.4% | |||||||
5,000M | Canadian Oil Sands, Ltd., 7.75%, 5/15/2019 (a) | 6,076,295 | |||||
4,800M | DCP Midstream, LLC, 9.75%, 3/15/2019 (a) | 6,121,910 | |||||
5,000M | Enbridge Energy Partners, LP, 4.2%, 9/15/2021 | 5,076,895 | |||||
5,000M | Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, LP, 3.45%, 2/15/2023 | 4,685,190 | |||||
1,681M | Maritime & Northeast Pipeline, LLC, 7.5%, 5/31/2014 (a) | 1,739,272 | |||||
5,000M | Nabors Industries, Inc., 6.15%, 2/15/2018 | 5,627,990 | |||||
4,000M | ONEOK Partners, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2022 | 3,691,896 | |||||
5,000M | Petrobras International Finance Co., 5.375%, 1/27/2021 | 5,047,925 | |||||
4,100M | Reliance Holdings USA, Inc., 4.5%, 10/19/2020 (a) | 4,053,096 | |||||
5,800M | Spectra Energy Capital, LLC, 6.2%, 4/15/2018 | 6,662,089 | |||||
4,000M | Valero Energy Corp., 9.375%, 3/15/2019 | 5,187,932 | |||||
4,000M | Weatherford International, Inc., 6.35%, 6/15/2017 | 4,491,916 | |||||
58,462,406 | |||||||
Financial Services—16.2% | |||||||
2,250M | Aflac, Inc., 8.5%, 5/15/2019 | 2,911,536 | |||||
6,000M | American Express Co., 7%, 3/19/2018 | 7,235,862 |
20 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Financial Services (continued) | |||||||
American International Group, Inc.: | |||||||
$3,100M | 4.875%, 9/15/2016 | $ 3,398,071 | |||||
3,200M | 8.25%, 8/15/2018 | 3,998,128 | |||||
4,000M | Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 5.3%, 3/15/2020 | 4,552,852 | |||||
3,800M | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 3.4%, 1/31/2022 | 3,821,219 | |||||
4,000M | BlackRock, Inc., 5%, 12/10/2019 | 4,544,028 | |||||
4,000M | CoBank, ACB, 7.875%, 4/16/2018 (a) | 4,884,900 | |||||
1,800M | Compass Bank, 6.4%, 10/1/2017 | 1,934,824 | |||||
5,750M | ERAC USA Finance Co., 4.5%, 8/16/2021 (a) | 6,008,503 | |||||
6,200M | Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC, 8.125%, 1/15/2020 | 7,733,657 | |||||
General Electric Capital Corp.: | |||||||
2,000M | 5.625%, 9/15/2017 | 2,280,994 | |||||
4,700M | 5.3%, 2/11/2021 | 5,119,451 | |||||
7,000M | 6.75%, 3/15/2032 | 8,373,022 | |||||
4,000M | Glencore Funding, LLC, 6%, 4/15/2014 (a) | 4,096,992 | |||||
3,800M | Harley-Davidson Funding Corp., 5.75%, 12/15/2014 (a) | 4,007,670 | |||||
4,000M | Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 4.95%, 5/1/2022 (a) | 4,143,424 | |||||
5,400M | Protective Life Corp., 7.375%, 10/15/2019 | 6,537,429 | |||||
4,000M | Prudential Financial, Inc., 7.375%, 6/15/2019 | 4,958,984 | |||||
90,541,546 | |||||||
Financials—20.0% | |||||||
Bank of America Corp.: | |||||||
2,900M | 5.65%, 5/1/2018 | 3,276,060 | |||||
4,300M | 5%, 5/13/2021 | 4,625,673 | |||||
8,000M | Barclays Bank, PLC, 5.125%, 1/8/2020 | 8,943,400 | |||||
3,168M | Bear Stearns Cos., Inc., 7.25%, 2/1/2018 | 3,798,084 | |||||
Citigroup, Inc.: | |||||||
3,400M | 4.45%, 1/10/2017 | 3,684,230 | |||||
6,800M | 6.125%, 11/21/2017 | 7,827,106 | |||||
2,000M | 4.5%, 1/14/2022 | 2,099,688 | |||||
2,000M | Fifth Third Bancorp, 3.5%, 3/15/2022 | 1,979,440 | |||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: | |||||||
6,000M | 6.15%, 4/1/2018 | 6,869,328 | |||||
1,900M | 5.75%, 1/24/2022 | 2,109,940 | |||||
3,000M | 3.625%, 1/22/2023 | 2,874,360 | |||||
1,600M | 6.125%, 2/15/2033 | 1,750,946 | |||||
3,650M | 6.75%, 10/1/2037 | 3,820,780 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co.: | |||||||
6,000M | 6%, 1/15/2018 | 6,896,526 | |||||
4,000M | 4.5%, 1/24/2022 | 4,179,636 |
21 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Financials (continued) | |||||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.: | |||||||
$2,000M | 5%, 1/15/2015 | $ 2,100,420 | |||||
4,600M | 6.4%, 8/28/2017 | 5,294,365 | |||||
Morgan Stanley: | |||||||
5,800M | 5.95%, 12/28/2017 | 6,568,210 | |||||
5,500M | 6.625%, 4/1/2018 | 6,391,572 | |||||
4,250M | 5.5%, 7/28/2021 | 4,655,595 | |||||
6,000M | SunTrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 9/11/2017 | 6,876,510 | |||||
4,000M | UBS AG, 4.875%, 8/4/2020 | 4,478,068 | |||||
Wells Fargo & Co.: | |||||||
5,800M | 4.6%, 4/1/2021 | 6,308,161 | |||||
1,800M | 3.5%, 3/8/2022 | 1,804,901 | |||||
3,000M | 3.45%, 2/13/2023 | 2,813,412 | |||||
112,026,411 | |||||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—8.2% | |||||||
4,000M | Altria Group, Inc., 9.7%, 11/10/2018 | 5,293,692 | |||||
4,000M | Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc., 5.375%, 1/15/2020 | 4,603,868 | |||||
3,000M | Bottling Group, LLC, 5.125%, 1/15/2019 | 3,416,916 | |||||
5,225M | Bunge Ltd. Finance Corp., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 6,513,569 | |||||
4,000M | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 6.82%, 5/1/2018 | 4,797,672 | |||||
4,165M | Ingredion, Inc., 4.625%, 11/1/2020 | 4,418,249 | |||||
4,000M | Lorillard Tobacco Co., 6.875%, 5/1/2020 | 4,606,212 | |||||
3,000M | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co., 4.9%, 11/1/2019 | 3,324,204 | |||||
4,000M | Philip Morris International, Inc., 5.65%, 5/16/2018 | 4,634,432 | |||||
4,000M | SABMiller Holdings, Inc., 3.75%, 1/15/2022 (a) | 4,038,984 | |||||
45,647,798 | |||||||
Food/Drug—.7% | |||||||
4,000M | Safeway, Inc., 4.75%, 12/1/2021 | 4,023,368 | |||||
Forest Products/Container—.5% | |||||||
2,200M | International Paper Co., 9.375%, 5/15/2019 | 2,904,539 | |||||
Gaming/Leisure—.7% | |||||||
4,000M | Marriott International, Inc., 3.25%, 9/15/2022 | 3,792,824 |
22 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Health Care—3.7% | |||||||
$4,000M | Biogen IDEC, Inc., 6.875%, 3/1/2018 | $ 4,753,256 | |||||
4,050M | Express Scripts Holding Co., 4.75%, 11/15/2021 | 4,342,066 | |||||
4,000M | Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings, 3.75%, 8/23/2022 | 3,904,548 | |||||
4,000M | Mylan, Inc., 3.125%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 3,645,432 | |||||
2,400M | Novartis Securities Investments, Ltd., 5.125%, 2/10/2019 | 2,751,986 | |||||
916M | Roche Holdings, Inc., 6%, 3/1/2019 (a) | 1,089,824 | |||||
20,487,112 | |||||||
Information Technology—3.3% | |||||||
4,000M | Harris Corp., 4.4%, 12/15/2020 | 4,151,728 | |||||
5,000M | Motorola Solutions, Inc., 6%, 11/15/2017 | 5,708,875 | |||||
4,000M | Pitney Bowes, Inc., 5.75%, 9/15/2017 | 4,412,352 | |||||
4,000M | Symantec Corp., 3.95%, 6/15/2022 | 3,944,116 | |||||
18,217,071 | |||||||
Manufacturing—3.0% | |||||||
3,000M | CRH America, Inc., 8.125%, 7/15/2018 | 3,655,533 | |||||
2,700M | General Electric Co., 5.25%, 12/6/2017 | 3,075,926 | |||||
4,000M | Ingersoll-Rand Global Holdings Co., Ltd., 6.875%, 8/15/2018 | 4,745,688 | |||||
2,500M | Pentair Finance SA, 3.15%, 9/15/2022 | 2,312,483 | |||||
2,725M | Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.55%, 10/1/2017 | 3,144,909 | |||||
16,934,539 | |||||||
Media-Broadcasting—3.1% | |||||||
3,950M | British Sky Broadcasting Group, PLC, 9.5%, 11/15/2018 (a) | 5,177,952 | |||||
2,000M | CBS Corp., 8.875%, 5/15/2019 | 2,559,630 | |||||
3,250M | Comcast Corp., 4.25%, 1/15/2033 | 3,074,783 | |||||
3,000M | DirecTV Holdings, LLC, 3.8%, 3/15/2022 | 2,805,012 | |||||
3,000M | Time Warner Entertainment Co., LP, 8.375%, 3/15/2023 | 3,505,224 | |||||
17,122,601 | |||||||
Media-Diversified—1.6% | |||||||
McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc.: | |||||||
1,800M | 5.9%, 11/15/2017 | 1,948,916 | |||||
2,300M | 6.55%, 11/15/2037 | 2,246,196 | |||||
4,000M | Vivendi SA, 6.625%, 4/4/2018 (a) | 4,528,208 | |||||
8,723,320 |
23 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Metals/Mining—4.9% | |||||||
$5,000M | Alcoa, Inc., 6.15%, 8/15/2020 | $ 5,223,395 | |||||
4,000M | ArcelorMittal, 6.125%, 6/1/2018 | 4,255,000 | |||||
4,200M | Newmont Mining Corp., 5.125%, 10/1/2019 | 4,423,406 | |||||
5,000M | Rio Tinto Finance USA, Ltd., 3.75%, 9/20/2021 | 4,938,155 | |||||
4,000M | Vale Overseas, Ltd., 5.625%, 9/15/2019 | 4,363,348 | |||||
4,000M | Xstrata Canada Financial Corp., 4.95%, 11/15/2021 (a) | 4,007,144 | |||||
27,210,448 | |||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—5.3% | |||||||
5,000M | Boston Properties, LP, 5.875%, 10/15/2019 | 5,765,645 | |||||
5,000M | Digital Realty Trust, LP, 5.25%, 3/15/2021 | 5,263,390 | |||||
5,000M | HCP, Inc., 5.375%, 2/1/2021 | 5,448,330 | |||||
4,000M | ProLogis, LP, 6.625%, 5/15/2018 | 4,681,852 | |||||
4,000M | Simon Property Group, LP, 5.75%, 12/1/2015 | 4,378,572 | |||||
4,000M | Ventas Realty, LP, 4.75%, 6/1/2021 | 4,219,032 | |||||
29,756,821 | |||||||
Retail-General Merchandise—1.6% | |||||||
6,000M | GAP, Inc., 5.95%, 4/12/2021 | 6,658,218 | |||||
2,000M | Home Depot, Inc., 5.875%, 12/16/2036 | 2,290,504 | |||||
8,948,722 | |||||||
Telecommunications—1.4% | |||||||
1,200M | BellSouth Telecommunications, 6.375%, 6/1/2028 | 1,311,959 | |||||
3,300M | GTE Corp., 6.84%, 4/15/2018 | 3,853,964 | |||||
3,000M | Rogers Communications, Inc., 3%, 3/15/2023 | 2,774,256 | |||||
7,940,179 | |||||||
Transportation—2.2% | |||||||
3,000M | Burlington North Santa Fe, LLC, 3%, 3/15/2023 | 2,828,673 | |||||
3,000M | Con-way, Inc., 7.25%, 1/15/2018 | 3,403,485 | |||||
4,000M | GATX Corp., 4.75%, 6/15/2022 | 4,087,788 | |||||
2,000M | Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP, 4.875%, 7/11/2022 (a) | 2,040,322 | |||||
12,360,268 |
24 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Utilities—5.3% | |||||||
$3,000M | E.ON International Finance BV, 5.8%, 4/30/2018 (a) | $ 3,486,330 | |||||
1,900M | Electricite de France SA, 6.5%, 1/26/2019 (a) | 2,281,624 | |||||
3,240M | Entergy Arkansas, Inc., 3.75%, 2/15/2021 | 3,351,245 | |||||
4,000M | Exelon Generation Co., LLC, 5.2%, 10/1/2019 | 4,386,440 | |||||
Great River Energy Co.: | |||||||
393M | 5.829%, 7/1/2017 (a) | 420,544 | |||||
3,538M | 4.478%, 7/1/2030 (a) | 3,618,419 | |||||
4,000M | National Fuel Gas Co., 8.75%, 5/1/2019 | 5,033,680 | |||||
3,000M | Ohio Power Co., 5.375%, 10/1/2021 | 3,382,119 | |||||
2,881M | Sempra Energy, 9.8%, 2/15/2019 | 3,859,719 | |||||
29,820,120 | |||||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $523,601,510) | 98.1 | % | 548,724,053 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.9 | 10,718,735 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $559,442,788 |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
25 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2013
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds* | $ | — | $ | 548,724,053 | $ | — | $ | 548,724,053 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for corporate bonds. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
26 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Strategic Income Fund annual report for the period from April 3, 2013, the Fund’s inception date, to September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was –0.9% for Class A shares, including dividends of 13.3 cents per share. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was –0.8% for Advisor shares, including dividends of 15.0 cents per share. The Advisor Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
During the review period, long-term interest rates moved sharply higher from historically low levels due to market concerns that the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) would taper — or decrease — its stimulus program.
Key economic indicators — including stronger housing and jobs-related data — further convinced the market that the Fed’s monetary policy would become less accommodative. Treasury yields rose to their highest level in two years and fixed-income sectors came under pressure due to a potential “great rotation” into equities. Towards the end of the review period, the Fed provided some relief to the market as it announced that its stimulus tapering plans was on hold.
The Fund can invest through institutional class shares in a number of First Investors Funds (Underlying Funds). The average allocations to Underlying Funds as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets and, the total returns for the review period and the allocations as a percentage of net assets as of the end of the period were:
Average Allocations | Allocations | ||
Review Period | Total Return | 9/30/13 | |
Equity Income Fund | 8.1% | 8.59% | 10.1% |
Fund For Income | 38.6% | 0.63% | 40.0% |
Government Fund | 7.3% | –1.64% | 10.0% |
International Opportunities | |||
Bond Fund | 18.5% | –2.27% | 15.1% |
Investment Grade Fund | 22.7% | –2.58% | 20.1% |
Cash | 4.8% | 0.00% | 4.7% |
For the review period, the Fund returned –0.87% compared to –2.16% for its benchmark, the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Broad Market Index. The Fund benefited from its emphasis on credit risk, expressed through its Equity Income and Fund For Income allocations. In particular, the Fund For Income, a high-yield bond fund, provided better returns than the more interest-rate-sensitive Government and
27 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
Investment Grade funds. Lastly, the Fund’s cash allocation, although returning 0%, substantially outperformed the benchmark.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
28 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/3/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/3/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.30% | |||
Actual* | $1,000.00 | $ 934.26 | $6.23 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.55 | $6.58 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.00% | |||
Actual* | $1,000.00 | $ 992.06 | $4.94 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.06 | $5.06 |
* | Actual expenses reflect only from the commencement of operations to the end of the period cov- |
ered (April 3, 2013 through September 30, 2013). Therefore expenses shown are lower than would | |
be expected for a six-month period. Actual expenses for the six-month period will be reflected in | |
future reports. Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio multipied by the average account | |
value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the inception period). Expenses paid during | |
the period are net of expenses waived and/or assumed. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total value of investments.
29 |
Portfolio of Investments
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
MUTUAL FUNDS—93.5% | |||||||
Fixed Income Funds—83.5% | |||||||
7,144,602 | First Investors Fund For Income – Institutional Shares | $18,575,964 | |||||
424,622 | First Investors Government Fund – Institutional Shares | 4,653,852 | |||||
710,236 | First Investors International Opportunities Bond Fund – | ||||||
Institutional Shares | 6,995,824 | ||||||
952,122 | First Investors Investment Grade Fund – Institutional Shares | 9,321,277 | |||||
39,546,917 | |||||||
Equity Funds—10.0% | |||||||
523,018 | First Investors Equity Income Fund – Institutional Shares | 4,717,622 | |||||
Total Value of Mutual Funds (cost $44,864,608) | 93.5 | % | 44,264,539 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 6.5 | 3,080,921 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $47,345,460 |
30 |
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Mutual Funds | ||||||||||||
Fixed Income Funds | $ | 39,546,917 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 39,546,917 | ||||
Equity Funds | 4,717,622 | — | — | 4,717,622 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 44,264,539 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 44,264,539 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 31 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors International Opportunities Bond Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was –0.7% for Class A shares, including capital gain distributions of 1.3 cents per share and dividends of 29.8 cents per share. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis for Advisor Class shares was –2.3% and –2.3% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 15.0 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 14.9 cents per share on Institutional Class shares. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
The strategy invests in sovereign bonds and currencies of countries in the Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index as well as some non-index countries, including those of emerging markets. Corporate bonds of countries in the Index may be purchased opportunistically as well. The main driver of outperformance relative to the Index during the 12-month period involved avoiding the Japanese yen. The yen began falling in November 2012 as markets foresaw a sweeping victory from Shinzo Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party in elections to occur in December. Abe pledged at the time that, if elected, he and his party would influence monetary and fiscal policy to reflate the Japanese economy. He installed a central bank chief at the head of the Bank of Japan in the spring of 2013 who promised to raise inflation expectations by pursuing quantitative easing measures and purchasing financial assets. The yen fell dramatically as a consequence against nearly every major world currency, so avoiding the yen in full helped the strategy outperform the Index, which holds a more than 40% exposure to the yen through Japanese government bonds exposures.
Although the yen positioning dominated relative performance, the strategy’s higher yield profile also generated a substantial benefit to relative performance. Longer maturity exposures in Mexico, Brazil, Australia, Hungary, South Africa, and the United Kingdom each contributed significantly to the strategy’s higher yield profile. Derivatives transactions produced a negligible impact on performance during the period. Unrealized and realized gains from derivatives, when aggregated, produced less than 10 basis points of negative impact.
Market Commentary and Outlook
It has been five years since the Great Financial Crisis of 2008. Yet, any discussion of the investment outlook invariably starts with reference to this historic event as if it happened yesterday. It is hard not to. The bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers coincided with a nearly $8 trillion collapse in U.S. household real estate values and ended a multi-decade debt super cycle. Perhaps even more destructively, the crisis demolished confidence and trust in the system, the outlook, policymakers, and in politicians. Confidence is the foundation of our financial system and it will take many years to recover.
32 |
Yet here we are five years later with house prices globally climbing once more and U.S. household net worth at new highs. Private sector U.S. GDP is expanding at a more than 3% annual rate. Europe seems to be emerging from recession with the monetary union intact and with competitiveness in most of the peripheral economies substantially improved. Instead of a credit bust, 7% looks like the floor on Chinese economic growth with the government acutely aware of the debt overhang and looking to reform.
Last year we coined the term “Risk of Success.” Our analysis of the economic outlook concluded that the longer unorthodox stimulus was sustained, the more likely the risks were in the direction of what could go right, rather than what could go wrong. The risk in success was that interest rate conditions would normalize if economic conditions improved enough and that this would coincide with a realignment of asset prices. The first stage of this normalization process has been underway for well over a year. Nominal safe-haven bond yields have been rising and yield curves steepening since July 2012, real yields have been moving up since December, gold has been weak, and equity risk premiums have been tumbling. These valuation movements are all market expressions of optimism in the outlook for non-inflationary economic growth!
Looking out over the next couple of quarters, we think stage one of renormalization is over but we expect continued improvement in growth and confidence will be an incremental process. Therefore, we believe the abrupt rise in U.S. real yields during the second quarter created an oversold condition in U.S. Treasuries. The sell-off across emerging debt markets was even more violent and indiscriminate, creating significant opportunities in markets with attractive debt dynamics and in many emerging markets fundamentals continue to improve on the back of structural reform. Therefore, we expect any bond panics like the one this summer will create opportunities for global bond investors.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
33 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.30% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 977.47 | $6.44 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.55 | $6.58 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.07% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 977.43 | $5.30 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.71 | $5.42 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.96% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 977.43 | $4.76 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.26 | $4.86 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total value of investments.
34 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Opportunities Bond Fund (Class A shares) and the Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index (Unhedged).
Average Annual Total Returns* | |||
Advisor | Institutional | ||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class | Class |
One Year | (.72%) | N/A | N/A |
Since Inception** | 1.44% | (2.26%) | (2.26%) |
Advisor | Institutional | ||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class | Class |
One Year | (6.39%) | N/A | N/A |
Since Inception** | (3.78%) | (2.26%) | (2.26%) |
S.E.C. 30-Day Yield*** | 2.05% | 2.58% | 2.72% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Opportunities Bond Fund (Class A shares) beginning 8/20/12 (commencement of operations) with a theoretical investment in the Citigroup World Government Bond ex-U.S. Index (Unhedged) (the “Index”). The Index encompasses an all-inclusive universe of institutionally traded bonds, including all fixed-rate bonds with remaining maturities of one year or longer with amounts outstanding of at least the equivalent of $25 million. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
35 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year and Since Inception would have been (6.70%) and (11.44%), respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 2.05%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (6.42%) and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 0.23%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Citigroup and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The returns for Class A shares are for the period beginning 8/17/12 (commencement of operations). The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations).
*** The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2013.
36 |
Portfolio of Investments
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
SOVEREIGN BONDS—60.0% | |||||||
United Kingdom—16.1% | |||||||
United Kingdom Gilt: | |||||||
$ 8,350M | GBP | 2.25%, 3/7/2014 | $ 13,634,362 | ||||
1,900M | GBP | 4.25%, 3/7/2036 | 3,495,257 | ||||
17,129,619 | |||||||
Mexico—13.1% | |||||||
United Mexican States: | |||||||
584M | MXN | 8.5%, 5/31/2029 | 5,190,143 | ||||
420M | MXN | 8.5%, 11/18/2038 | 3,700,587 | ||||
613M | MXN | 7.75%, 11/13/2042 | 4,960,589 | ||||
13,851,319 | |||||||
Italy—7.2% | |||||||
5,660M | EUR | Italy Buoni Poliennali Del Tesoro, 5%, 8/1/2039 | 7,648,669 | ||||
South Korea—4.5% | |||||||
Republic of Korea: | |||||||
556,000M | KRW | 3%, 12/10/2013 | 517,812 | ||||
4,108,000M | KRW | 5.75%, 9/10/2018 | 4,285,863 | ||||
4,803,675 | |||||||
Poland—4.3% | |||||||
Republic of Poland: | |||||||
10,085M | PLN | 5%, 10/24/2013 | 3,235,574 | ||||
3,790M | PLN | 5.25%, 10/25/2020 | 1,287,925 | ||||
4,523,499 | |||||||
South Africa—3.9% | |||||||
Republic of South Africa: | |||||||
12,855M | ZAR | 6.75%, 3/31/2021 | 1,231,666 | ||||
38,815M | ZAR | 6.5%, 2/28/2041 | 2,908,690 | ||||
4,140,356 | |||||||
New Zealand—3.8% | |||||||
New Zealand Government Bonds: | |||||||
2,390M | NZD | 5%, 3/15/2019 | 2,073,469 | ||||
2,230M | NZD | 5.5%, 4/15/2023 | 1,991,192 | ||||
4,064,661 |
37 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Hungary—2.7% | |||||||
Hungary Government Bond: | |||||||
$ 535,000M | HUF | 5.5%, 2/12/2016 | $ 2,503,355 | ||||
69,000M | HUF | 7.5%, 11/12/2020 | 352,344 | ||||
2,855,699 | |||||||
Ireland—2.0% | |||||||
Republic of Ireland: | |||||||
885M | EUR | 4.5%, 4/18/2020 | 1,263,954 | ||||
575M | EUR | 5%, 10/18/2020 | 843,988 | ||||
2,107,942 | |||||||
Turkey—1.3% | |||||||
2,795M | TRY | Republic of Turkey, 9%, 3/5/2014 | 1,392,768 | ||||
Brazil—1.1% | |||||||
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional: | |||||||
1M | BRL | 9.76%, 1/1/2021 | 214,019 | ||||
2M | BRL | 9.76%, 1/1/2023 | 932,387 | ||||
1,146,406 | |||||||
Total Value of Sovereign Bonds (cost $64,398,884) | 63,664,613 | ||||||
GOVERNMENT REGIONAL AGENCY—10.0% | |||||||
Australia—9.6% | |||||||
3,950M | AUD | New South Wales Treasury Corp., 6%, 4/1/2016 | 3,962,373 | ||||
Queensland Treasury Corp.: | |||||||
3,260M | AUD | 6.25%, 2/21/2020 | 3,404,427 | ||||
735M | AUD | 6%, 7/21/2022 | 756,667 | ||||
2,045M | AUD | Treasury Corp. of Victoria, 5.75%, 11/15/2016 | 2,058,961 | ||||
10,182,428 | |||||||
Netherlands—.4% | |||||||
466M | USD | Bank Nederlanse Gemeenten, 1%, 11/17/2014 (b) | 469,147 | ||||
Total Value of Government Regional Agency (cost $11,520,103) | 10,651,575 | ||||||
GOVERNMENT SOVEREIGN AGENCY—5.8% | |||||||
Sweden—3.0% | |||||||
3,200M | USD | Swedish Export Credit, 0.625%, 9/4/2015 | 3,210,714 |
38 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Norway—1.2% | |||||||
$ 1,250M | USD | Kommunalbanken AS, 0.33185%, 3/18/2016 (a)(b) | $ 1,249,930 | ||||
Denmark—.9% | |||||||
940M | USD | KommuneKredit, 0.3141%, 11/20/2014 (a) | 940,653 | ||||
Canada—.7% | |||||||
1,677M | BRL | Export Development Canada, 5.125%, 7/31/2014 | 733,388 | ||||
Total Value of Government Sovereign Agency (cost $6,239,231) | 6,134,685 | ||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—5.7% | |||||||
United States | |||||||
6,010M | USD | U.S. Treasury Note, 0.25%, 6/30/2014 (cost $6,013,738) | 6,017,278 | ||||
GOVERNMENT GUARANTEED PROGRAM—5.5% | |||||||
Germany—3.5% | |||||||
1,000M | USD | Erste Abwicklungsanstalt, 0.4581%, 6/7/2016 (a) | 999,709 | ||||
Kreditanstalt fuer Wiederaufbau: | |||||||
905M | USD | 0.375%, 5/15/2015 (c) | 905,143 | ||||
1,735M | AUD | 6.25%, 12/4/2019 (c) | 1,799,090 | ||||
3,703,942 | |||||||
Netherlands—1.3% | |||||||
1,350M | USD | Neder Waterschapsbank, 0.3138%, 10/27/2014 (a)(b) | 1,350,609 | ||||
New Zealand—.7% | |||||||
720M | USD | Wespac Securities New Zealand, Ltd., 3.45%, 7/28/2014 (b) | 738,729 | ||||
Total Value of Government Guaranteed Program (cost $6,016,912) | 5,793,280 | ||||||
SUPRANATIONAL—2.0% | |||||||
United States—1.1% | |||||||
2,800M | BRL | Inter-American Development Bank, 5.25%, 7/19/2016 | 1,140,478 | ||||
Phillipines—.5% | |||||||
1,272M | BRL | Asian Development Bank, 5.25%, 9/25/2015 | 532,051 | ||||
Luxembourg—.4% | |||||||
1,150M | BRL | European Investment Bank, 6%, 1/25/2016 (b) | 485,820 | ||||
Total Value of Supranational (cost $2,610,983) | 2,158,349 |
39 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—6.4% | |||||||
United States | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills: | |||||||
$ 4,870M | USD | 0.0585%, 11/14/2013 | $ 4,869,652 | ||||
1,365M | USD | 0.105%, 11/14/2013 | 1,364,825 | ||||
610M | USD | 0.13%, 11/14/2013 | 609,900 | ||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Obligations (cost $6,844,377) | 6,844,377 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $103,644,228) | 95.4 | % | 101,264,157 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 4.6 | 4,896,305 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $106,160,462 |
(a) | Interest rates are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates above are the rates in effect |
at September 30, 2013. | |
(b) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
(c) | The Federal Republic of Germany guarantees all existing and future obligations of Kreditanstalt |
fuer Wiederaufbau (“KFW”) in respect of money borrowed, bonds issued, and derivative | |
transactions entered into by KFW, as well as third party obligations that are expressly | |
guaranteed by KFW. |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
AUD | Australian Dollar |
BRL | Brazillian Real |
EUR | Euro |
GBP | British Pound |
HUF | Hungarian Forint |
KRW | South Korean Won |
MXN | Mexican Peso |
NZD | New Zealand Dollar |
PLN | Polish Zloty |
TRY | Turkish Lira |
USD | United States Dollar |
ZAR | South African Rand |
40 |
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observ- | |
able for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include | ||
quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar | ||
instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates | ||
and similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Sovereign Bonds | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom | $ | — | $ | 17,129,619 | $ | — | $ | 17,129,619 | ||||
Mexico | — | 13,851,319 | — | 13,851,319 | ||||||||
Italy | — | 7,648,669 | — | 7,648,669 | ||||||||
South Korea | — | 4,803,675 | — | 4,803,675 | ||||||||
Poland | — | 4,523,499 | — | 4,523,499 | ||||||||
South Africa | — | 4,140,356 | — | 4,140,356 | ||||||||
New Zealand | — | 4,064,661 | — | 4,064,661 | ||||||||
Hungary | — | 2,855,699 | — | 2,855,699 | ||||||||
Ireland | — | 2,107,942 | — | 2,107,942 | ||||||||
Turkey | — | 1,392,768 | — | 1,392,768 | ||||||||
Brazil | — | 1,146,406 | — | 1,146,406 | ||||||||
Government Regional Agency | ||||||||||||
Australia | — | 10,182,428 | — | 10,182,428 | ||||||||
Netherlands | — | 469,147 | — | 469,147 | ||||||||
Government Sovereign Agency | ||||||||||||
Sweden | — | 3,210,714 | — | 3,210,714 | ||||||||
Norway | — | 1,249,930 | — | 1,249,930 | ||||||||
Denmark | — | 940,653 | — | 940,653 | ||||||||
Canada | — | 733,388 | — | 733,388 |
41 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND
September 30, 2013
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | — | $ | 6,017,278 | $ | — | $ | 6,017,278 | ||||
Government Guaranteed Program | ||||||||||||
Germany | — | 3,703,942 | — | 3,703,942 | ||||||||
Netherlands | — | 1,350,609 | — | 1,350,609 | ||||||||
New Zealand | — | 738,729 | — | 738,729 | ||||||||
Supranational | ||||||||||||
United States | — | 1,140,478 | — | 1,140,478 | ||||||||
Phillipines | — | 532,051 | — | 532,051 | ||||||||
Luxembourg | — | 485,820 | — | 485,820 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | ||||||||||||
United States | — | 6,844,377 | — | 6,844,377 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 101,264,157 | $ | — | $ | 101,264,157 | ||||
Other Financial Instruments* | $ | — | $ | (739,042) | $ | — | $ | (739,042) |
* | Other financial instruments are foreign exchange contracts and are considered derivative instruments, |
which are valued at the net unrealized depreciation on the instrument. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
42 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
FUND FOR INCOME
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Fund For Income annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 5.6% for Class A shares and 4.8% for Class B shares, including dividends of 15.2 cents per share on Class A shares and 13.4 cents on Class B shares. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 0.2% for Advisor Class shares and 0.7% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 7.6 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 7.8 cents per share on Institutional Class shares. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
Coming off of a very strong 2012, high-yield markets generated attractive, but below-coupon, performance for fiscal year 2013. From a fundamental perspective, many high-yield companies continued to benefit from contained costs, steady cash balances, and the aggressive refinancing of debt at today’s low rates.
As a result, in general markets trended positively during the year, but suffered interruptions throughout the summer on the back of changing investor sentiments about the likely fate of Treasury rate increases. Fixed-income markets reacted strongly to Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) comments at the end of May regarding the potential reduction or elimination of the Fed’s bond-buying program, dubbed Quantitative Easing (“QE”), resulting in the first of three down months for the period.
In May, strong U.S. consumer confidence and robust U.S. housing price improvements signaled improving economic conditions — increasing the market’s expectation that quantitative easing would be withdrawn sooner rather than later. Both equities and fixed-income declined through June on the news.
In July, investor risk appetite resurfaced to capture higher yields even as Ben Bernanke’s comments that quantitative easing was “by no means on a preset course” and “would be dependent on economic conditions” failed to stem a rise in Treasury rates. The cycle largely repeated in August and September as stronger-than-anticipated economic data convinced investors that the Fed may begin to taper QE, ahead of the Fed’s September assurances that they would not yet do so.
In this environment, the Fund provided competitive returns slightly trailing the benchmark after fees. The Fund delivered solid credit selection and outperformed the index across a wide variety of industries, earning its biggest contributions relative to the market from investments in cable, energy, chemicals and steel.
The Fund did not share in the benchmark’s gains from investments in banks and insurance companies. As in past years, we believe that banks and insurers tend to feature opaque credit risks and we therefore remain underinvested in these sectors.
43 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
The Fund benefited versus the benchmark from its concentration in lower-duration or less interest-rate sensitive holdings, a trend that could be accentuated should interest rates appear poised to increase.
We believe that fiscal year 2014 for the Fund starts very much where 2013 left off. Largely in the absence of credit concerns, we believe that high-yield markets are not likely to be impacted by credit defaults — which are poised to remain historically low — but instead by factors other than corporate fundamentals. Specifically, moves in the prices and yields of Treasuries, as well as political wrangling about the economy in Washington, could create price movement in the high yield market as investors change their views with regard to larger economic issues. Thus, short bouts of Treasury volatility could result in small episodes of high yield price volatility, even when nothing has fundamentally changed in the outlook for most high yield companies.
Investors already appear satisfied by late October’s Congressional budget and debt-ceiling actions, but both issues will continue to make headlines in 2014. Interestingly, the Fed’s Ben Bernanke cited political uncertainty around the U.S. debt-ceiling debate as a risk to the U.S. economic outlook and one of the reasons why the Fed chose not to begin its tapering activity in September.
We anticipate increased volatility around Treasuries in the short-term based on any apparent episodes of government impasse. If the budget and debt-ceiling issues are resolved, then we could see Treasury rates move higher as flight-to-quality fears subside.
Corporate-credit fundamentals remain strong, but investors do not like gridlock and the political posturing coming out of Washington. History has demonstrated that such uncertainty can impact the price of high-yield bonds as well as other risk assets. As market participants gain clarity on the timing of Fed tapering and become more confident in economic conditions, the high yield market could benefit.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
44 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.21% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,002.37 | $ 6.07 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.00 | $ 6.12 | |
Class B Shares | 2.03% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 998.95 | $10.17 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.89 | $10.25 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.03% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,002.79 | $ 5.17 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.91 | $ 5.22 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.81% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,006.61 | $ 4.07 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.01 | $ 4.10 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total value of investments.
45 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Fund For Income (Class A shares), the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 5.55% | 4.84% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 8.66% | 7.89% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 5.73% | 5.25% | .23% | .66% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | (.57%) | .85% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 7.37% | 7.59% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 5.10% | 5.25% | .23% | .66% |
S.E.C. 30-Day Yield*** | 4.05% | 3.52% | 4.48% | 4.71% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Fund For Income (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/03 with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch BB-B U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index (the “Index”). The Index contains all securities in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Cash Pay High Yield Index rated BB1 through B3, based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, but caps issuer exposure at 2%. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
46 |
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (.58%), 7.35% and 5.08%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 4.02%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been .83%, 7.49% and 5.17%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 3.50%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (3.87%) and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 2.22%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 0.64% and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2013 would have been 4.68%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. The issuers of high yield bonds, in which the Fund primarily invests, pay higher interest rates because they have a greater likelihood of financial difficulty, which could result in their inability to repay the bonds fully when due. Prices of high yield bonds are also subject to greater fluctuations. Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations).
*** The S.E.C. 30-Day Yield shown is for September 2013.
47 |
Portfolio of Investments
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
CORPORATE BONDS—89.3% | |||||||
Aerospace/Defense—.6% | |||||||
$ 3,725M | Meccanica Holdings USA, Inc., 6.25%, 7/15/2019 (a) | $ 3,841,380 | |||||
Automotive—3.5% | |||||||
American Axle & Manufacturing, Inc.: | |||||||
2,350M | 6.25%, 3/15/2021 | 2,432,250 | |||||
1,950M | 6.625%, 10/15/2022 | 2,008,500 | |||||
2,375M | Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 8%, 12/15/2019 | 2,437,344 | |||||
2,825M | Cooper-Standard Automotive, Inc., 8.5%, 5/1/2018 | 3,022,750 | |||||
General Motors Financial Co., Inc.: | |||||||
575M | 3.25%, 5/15/2018 (a) | 560,625 | |||||
175M | 4.25%, 5/15/2023 (a) | 160,344 | |||||
2,650M | Gestamp Funding Luxembourg SA, 5.625%, 5/31/2020 (a) | 2,650,000 | |||||
900M | Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 8.25%, 8/15/2020 | 1,010,250 | |||||
2,100M | Oshkosh Corp., 8.5%, 3/1/2020 | 2,325,750 | |||||
Schaeffler Finance BV: | |||||||
1,300M | 6.875%, 8/15/2018 (a) | 1,368,250 | |||||
1,900M | 8.5%, 2/15/2019 (a) | 2,128,000 | |||||
3,250M | 4.75%, 5/15/2021 (a) | 3,168,750 | |||||
23,272,813 | |||||||
Building Materials—1.9% | |||||||
425M | Allegion US Holding Co., 5.75%, 10/1/2021 (a)(b) | 428,187 | |||||
Building Materials Corp.: | |||||||
3,625M | 6.875%, 8/15/2018 (a) | 3,892,344 | |||||
1,700M | 7.5%, 3/15/2020 (a) | 1,840,250 | |||||
1,325M | Cemex Finance, LLC, 9.375%, 10/12/2022 (a) | 1,457,500 | |||||
Cemex SAB de CV: | |||||||
1,350M | 9.5%, 6/15/2018 (a) | 1,501,875 | |||||
525M | 5.875%, 3/25/2019 (a) | 505,312 | |||||
400M | 6.5%, 12/10/2019 (a) | 395,000 | |||||
2,150M | Texas Industries, Inc., 9.25%, 8/15/2020 | 2,375,750 | |||||
12,396,218 | |||||||
Chemicals—2.2% | |||||||
2,950M | Ferro Corp., 7.875%, 8/15/2018 | 3,112,250 | |||||
1,625M | Huntsman International, LLC, 8.625%, 3/15/2020 | 1,795,625 | |||||
1,125M | LSB Industries, Inc., 7.75%, 8/1/2019 (a) | 1,172,813 | |||||
675M | NOVA Chemicals Corp., 5.25%, 8/1/2023 (a) | 678,797 | |||||
2,575M | Orion Engineered Carbon Bondco GmbH, 9.625%, | ||||||
6/15/2018 (a) | 2,858,250 |
48 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Chemicals (continued) | |||||||
$ 525M | SPCM SA, 6%, 1/15/2022 (a)(b) | $ 530,250 | |||||
4,175M | TPC Group, Inc., 8.75%, 12/15/2020 (a) | 4,289,813 | |||||
14,437,798 | |||||||
Consumer Non-Durables—2.5% | |||||||
2,200M | Hanesbrands, Inc., 6.375%, 12/15/2020 | 2,381,500 | |||||
Levi Strauss & Co.: | |||||||
925M | 7.625%, 5/15/2020 | 1,001,313 | |||||
2,625M | 6.875%, 5/1/2022 | 2,795,625 | |||||
1,017M | Libbey Glass, Inc., 6.875%, 5/15/2020 | 1,088,190 | |||||
3,025M | Phillips Van-Heusen Corp., 7.375%, 5/15/2020 | 3,312,375 | |||||
Reynolds Group Issuer, Inc.: | |||||||
650M | 7.125%, 4/15/2019 | 693,875 | |||||
3,600M | 5.75%, 10/15/2020 | 3,631,500 | |||||
Spectrum Brands Escrow Corp.: | |||||||
825M | 6.375%, 11/15/2020 (a) | 862,125 | |||||
1,075M | 6.625%, 11/15/2022 (a) | 1,118,000 | |||||
16,884,503 | |||||||
Energy—15.2% | |||||||
AmeriGas Finance, LLC: | |||||||
500M | 6.75%, 5/20/2020 | 533,750 | |||||
1,250M | 7%, 5/20/2022 | 1,306,250 | |||||
1,300M | Antero Resources Finance Corp., 6%, 12/1/2020 | 1,319,500 | |||||
Atlas Pipeline Partners, LP: | |||||||
1,550M | 4.75%, 11/15/2021 (a) | 1,408,562 | |||||
4,000M | 5.875%, 8/1/2023 (a) | 3,780,000 | |||||
Basic Energy Services, Inc.: | |||||||
1,025M | 7.75%, 2/15/2019 | 1,040,375 | |||||
2,100M | 7.75%, 10/15/2022 | 2,042,250 | |||||
Berry Petroleum Co.: | |||||||
675M | 6.75%, 11/1/2020 | 690,187 | |||||
2,275M | 6.375%, 9/15/2022 | 2,297,750 | |||||
2,650M | Calumet Specialty Products Partners, LP, 9.625%, 8/1/2020 | 2,941,500 | |||||
Chesapeake Energy Corp.: | |||||||
2,025M | 7.25%, 12/15/2018 | 2,303,437 | |||||
800M | 6.625%, 8/15/2020 | 864,000 | |||||
800M | 6.875%, 11/15/2020 | 868,000 | |||||
1,675M | 5.75%, 3/15/2023 | 1,687,562 | |||||
875M | Concho Resources, Inc., 5.5%, 4/1/2023 | 868,437 |
49 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Energy (continued) | |||||||
Consol Energy, Inc.: | |||||||
$ 1,225M | 8%, 4/1/2017 | $ 1,307,687 | |||||
4,250M | 8.25%, 4/1/2020 | 4,579,375 | |||||
200M | Continental Resources, Inc., 4.5%, 4/15/2023 | 197,250 | |||||
3,675M | Eagle Rock Energy Partners, LP, 8.375%, 6/1/2019 | 3,693,375 | |||||
2,750M | El Paso Corp., 6.5%, 9/15/2020 | 2,893,698 | |||||
1,475M | Energy XXI Gulf Coast, Inc., 7.5%, 12/15/2021 (a) | 1,460,250 | |||||
3,126M | Expro Finance Luxembourg SCA, 8.5%, 12/15/2016 (a) | 3,294,022 | |||||
3,450M | Ferrellgas Partners, LP, 9.125%, 10/1/2017 | 3,635,437 | |||||
1,175M | Forum Energy Technologies, Inc., 6.25%, 10/1/2021 (a) | 1,185,281 | |||||
3,375M | Genesis Energy, LP, 7.875%, 12/15/2018 | 3,619,687 | |||||
1,050M | Gibson Energy, Inc., 6.75%, 7/15/2021 (a) | 1,089,375 | |||||
1,700M | Inergy Midstream, LP, 6%, 12/15/2020 (a) | 1,695,750 | |||||
Legacy Reserves, LP: | |||||||
3,175M | 8%, 12/1/2020 (a) | 3,222,625 | |||||
1,500M | 6.625%, 12/1/2021 (a) | 1,410,000 | |||||
Linn Energy, LLC: | |||||||
625M | 6.5%, 5/15/2019 | 603,125 | |||||
1,850M | 6.25%, 11/1/2019 (a) | 1,752,875 | |||||
1,225M | 8.625%, 4/15/2020 | 1,272,469 | |||||
1,975M | 7.75%, 2/1/2021 | 1,994,750 | |||||
Newfield Exploration Co.: | |||||||
450M | 7.125%, 5/15/2018 | 469,125 | |||||
1,100M | 5.75%, 1/30/2022 | 1,102,750 | |||||
1,350M | NuStar Logistics, LP, 6.75%, 2/1/2021 | 1,380,375 | |||||
Oasis Petroleum, Inc.: | |||||||
925M | 6.5%, 11/1/2021 | 980,500 | |||||
350M | 6.875%, 3/15/2022 (a) | 370,125 | |||||
Offshore Group Investment, Ltd.: | |||||||
1,875M | 7.5%, 11/1/2019 | 1,982,813 | |||||
1,075M | 7.125%, 4/1/2023 | 1,053,500 | |||||
1,675M | Pacific Drilling SA, 5.375%, 6/1/2020 (a) | 1,637,313 | |||||
Penn Virginia Resource Partners, LP: | |||||||
2,200M | 8.25%, 4/15/2018 | 2,293,500 | |||||
925M | 8.375%, 6/1/2020 | 966,625 | |||||
300M | 6.5%, 5/15/2021 (a) | 284,625 | |||||
1,550M | PetroLogistics, LP, 6.25%, 4/1/2020 (a) | 1,526,750 | |||||
700M | Plains Exploration & Production Co., 6.125%, 6/15/2019 | 750,906 | |||||
4,000M | Rain CII Carbon, LLC, 8.25%, 1/15/2021 (a) | 4,040,000 | |||||
1,600M | Range Resources Corp., 5%, 3/15/2023 | 1,544,000 | |||||
1,565M | RKI Exploration & Production, LLC, 8.5%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 1,578,694 |
50 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Energy (continued) | |||||||
$ 1,575M | Samson Investment Co., 10.25%, 2/15/2020 (a) | $ 1,677,375 | |||||
4,850M | SandRidge Energy, Inc., 7.5%, 2/15/2023 | 4,825,750 | |||||
1,125M | SESI, LLC, 6.375%, 5/1/2019 | 1,195,313 | |||||
SM Energy Co.: | |||||||
600M | 6.625%, 2/15/2019 | 627,000 | |||||
1,175M | 6.5%, 11/15/2021 | 1,227,875 | |||||
1,150M | 6.5%, 1/1/2023 | 1,178,750 | |||||
Suburban Propane Partners, LP: | |||||||
2,089M | 7.5%, 10/1/2018 | 2,245,675 | |||||
433M | 7.375%, 8/1/2021 | 465,475 | |||||
600M | Tesoro Logistics, LP, 5.875%, 10/1/2020 | 601,500 | |||||
2,875M | Unit Corp., 6.625%, 5/15/2021 | 2,961,250 | |||||
101,826,155 | |||||||
Financials—4.5% | |||||||
Algeco Scotsman Global Finance, PLC: | |||||||
1,650M | 8.5%, 10/15/2018 (a) | 1,753,125 | |||||
800M | 10.75%, 10/15/2019 (a) | 808,000 | |||||
Ally Financial, Inc.: | |||||||
4,300M | 6.25%, 12/1/2017 | 4,614,321 | |||||
1,350M | 4.75%, 9/10/2018 | 1,345,428 | |||||
5,025M | 8%, 3/15/2020 | 5,803,875 | |||||
675M | CNH Capital, LLC, 6.25%, 11/1/2016 | 745,875 | |||||
1,075M | Hockey Merger Sub 2, Inc., 7.875%, 10/1/2021 (a)(b) | 1,081,719 | |||||
International Lease Finance Corp.: | |||||||
4,775M | 8.75%, 3/15/2017 | 5,503,188 | |||||
825M | 6.25%, 5/15/2019 | 870,375 | |||||
4,450M | 8.25%, 12/15/2020 | 5,084,125 | |||||
1,725M | Midcontinent Communications & Finance Corp., 6.25%, | ||||||
8/1/2021 (a) | 1,742,250 | ||||||
900M | Nielsen Co., (Luxembourg) Sarl, 5.5%, 10/1/2021 (a) | 903,375 | |||||
30,255,656 | |||||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—1.0% | |||||||
1,650M | B&G Foods, Inc., 4.625%, 6/1/2021 | 1,579,875 | |||||
875M | Barry Callebaut Services SA, 5.5%, 6/15/2023 (a) | 885,378 | |||||
1,650M | Chiquita Brands International, Inc., 7.875%, 2/1/2021 (a) | 1,757,250 | |||||
1,700M | JBS USA, LLC, 7.25%, 6/1/2021 (a) | 1,691,500 | |||||
725M | Sun Merger Sub, Inc., 5.25%, 8/1/2018 (a) | 744,938 | |||||
6,658,941 |
51 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Food/Drug—1.4% | |||||||
$ 2,900M | BI-LO, LLC, 8.625%, 9/15/2018 (a) | $ 2,958,000 | |||||
3,600M | NBTY, Inc., 9%, 10/1/2018 | 3,969,000 | |||||
2,450M | Tops Holding Corp., 8.875%, 12/15/2017 (a) | 2,695,000 | |||||
9,622,000 | |||||||
Forest Products/Containers—3.3% | |||||||
Ardagh Packaging Finance, PLC: | |||||||
2,050M | 7.375%, 10/15/2017 (a) | 2,202,844 | |||||
3,500M | 7%, 11/15/2020 (a) | 3,377,500 | |||||
Ball Corp.: | |||||||
2,450M | 7.375%, 9/1/2019 | 2,664,375 | |||||
1,050M | 4%, 11/15/2023 | 947,625 | |||||
3,525M | Clearwater Paper Corp., 7.125%, 11/1/2018 | 3,807,000 | |||||
1,925M | CROWN Americas, LLC, 4.5%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 1,771,000 | |||||
2,200M | Greif, Inc., 7.75%, 8/1/2019 | 2,497,000 | |||||
Sealed Air Corp.: | |||||||
1,500M | 8.125%, 9/15/2019 (a) | 1,680,000 | |||||
1,250M | 8.375%, 9/15/2021 (a) | 1,421,875 | |||||
1,582M | Tekni-Plex, Inc., 9.75%, 6/1/2019 (a) | 1,787,660 | |||||
22,156,879 | |||||||
Gaming/Leisure—1.0% | |||||||
1,350M | Hilton Worldwide Finance, LLC, 5.625%, 10/15/2021 (a)(b) | 1,355,906 | |||||
700M | Nai Entertainment Holdings, LLC, 5%, 8/1/2018 (a) | 717,500 | |||||
2,950M | National CineMedia, LLC, 7.875%, 7/15/2021 | 3,230,250 | |||||
1,350M | Six Flags Entertainment Corp., 5.25%, 1/15/2021 (a) | 1,289,250 | |||||
6,592,906 | |||||||
Health Care—5.9% | |||||||
850M | Aviv Healthcare Properties, LP, 7.75%, 2/15/2019 | 915,875 | |||||
3,249M | Biomet, Inc., 6.5%, 8/1/2020 | 3,370,838 | |||||
Community Health Systems, Inc.: | |||||||
3,350M | 8%, 11/15/2019 | 3,530,062 | |||||
2,425M | 7.125%, 7/15/2020 | 2,452,281 | |||||
1,425M | DaVita, Inc., 6.375%, 11/1/2018 | 1,499,812 | |||||
1,150M | Fresenius Medical Care US Finance II, Inc., 5.625%, | ||||||
7/31/2019 (a) | 1,204,625 | ||||||
4,400M | Genesis Health Ventures, Inc., 9.75%, 6/15/2005 (c)(d) | — |
52 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Health Care (continued) | |||||||
HCA, Inc.: | |||||||
$ 2,075M | 8%, 10/1/2018 | $ 2,391,438 | |||||
675M | 8.5%, 4/15/2019 | 727,312 | |||||
2,000M | 6.5%, 2/15/2020 | 2,172,500 | |||||
475M | 7.25%, 9/15/2020 | 517,750 | |||||
1,225M | 6.25%, 2/15/2021 | 1,247,969 | |||||
1,950M | 7.75%, 5/15/2021 | 2,079,187 | |||||
1,525M | 7.5%, 2/15/2022 | 1,677,500 | |||||
HealthSouth Corp.: | |||||||
850M | 8.125%, 2/15/2020 | 929,688 | |||||
945M | 7.75%, 9/15/2022 | 1,018,238 | |||||
4,050M | Tenet Healthcare Corp., 8.125%, 4/1/2022 (a) | 4,237,313 | |||||
2,500M | Universal Hospital Services, Inc., 7.625%, 8/15/2020 | 2,593,750 | |||||
4,125M | Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 6.375%, | ||||||
10/15/2020 (a) | 4,310,625 | ||||||
2,250M | Vanguard Health Holding Co. II, LLC, 8%, 2/1/2018 | 2,385,000 | |||||
39,261,763 | |||||||
Information Technology—2.6% | |||||||
Activision Blizzard, Inc.: | |||||||
1,075M | 5.625%, 9/15/2021 (a) | 1,079,031 | |||||
500M | 6.125%, 9/15/2023 (a) | 503,750 | |||||
1,750M | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 7.5%, 8/15/2022 | 1,684,375 | |||||
Audatex North America, Inc.: | |||||||
2,000M | 6.75%, 6/15/2018 | 2,130,000 | |||||
1,200M | 6%, 6/15/2021 (a) | 1,230,000 | |||||
1,475M | CyrusOne, LP, 6.375%, 11/15/2022 | 1,471,312 | |||||
1,250M | Equinix, Inc., 7%, 7/15/2021 | 1,335,937 | |||||
3,175M | Healthcare Technology Intermediate, Inc., 7.375%, 9/1/2018 (a) | 3,258,344 | |||||
1,825M | Lender Processing Services, Inc., 5.75%, 4/15/2023 | 1,882,031 | |||||
2,100M | MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc., 7.75%, 4/1/2019 | 2,184,000 | |||||
675M | Verisign, Inc., 4.625%, 5/1/2023 (a) | 637,875 | |||||
17,396,655 | |||||||
Manufacturing—3.9% | |||||||
1,550M | Amsted Industries, 8.125%, 3/15/2018 (a) | 1,650,750 | |||||
Bombardier, Inc.: | |||||||
2,425M | 7.5%, 3/15/2018 (a) | 2,734,187 | |||||
2,575M | 7.75%, 3/15/2020 (a) | 2,922,625 | |||||
1,500M | 6.125%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 1,507,500 |
53 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Manufacturing (continued) | |||||||
$ 3,850M | Case New Holland, Inc., 7.875%, 12/1/2017 | $ 4,494,875 | |||||
2,450M | Dematic SA, 7.75%, 12/15/2020 (a) | 2,560,250 | |||||
3,350M | Edgen Murray Corp., 8.75%, 11/1/2020 (a) | 3,417,000 | |||||
1,550M | EDP Finance BV, 6%, 2/2/2018 (a) | 1,608,125 | |||||
Rexel SA: | |||||||
4,500M | 6.125%, 12/15/2019 (a) | 4,623,750 | |||||
975M | 5.25%, 6/15/2020 (a) | 955,500 | |||||
26,474,562 | |||||||
Media-Broadcasting—3.1% | |||||||
2,450M | Allbritton Communication Co., 8%, 5/15/2018 | 2,649,062 | |||||
Belo Corp.: | |||||||
725M | 7.75%, 6/1/2027 | 772,125 | |||||
150M | 7.25%, 9/15/2027 | 152,250 | |||||
2,825M | Block Communications, Inc., 7.25%, 2/1/2020 (a) | 2,980,375 | |||||
1,600M | LIN Television Corp., 8.375%, 4/15/2018 | 1,712,000 | |||||
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.: | |||||||
2,475M | 8.875%, 4/15/2017 | 2,698,988 | |||||
3,175M | 6.875%, 11/15/2020 (a) | 3,246,438 | |||||
Sinclair Television Group, Inc.: | |||||||
2,000M | 9.25%, 11/1/2017 (a) | 2,109,200 | |||||
2,300M | 5.375%, 4/1/2021 | 2,196,500 | |||||
925M | 6.375%, 11/1/2021 (a)(b) | 934,250 | |||||
Sirius XM Radio, Inc.: | |||||||
850M | 5.75%, 8/1/2021 (a) | 850,000 | |||||
800M | 4.625%, 5/15/2023 (a) | 732,000 | |||||
21,033,188 | |||||||
Media-Cable TV—6.5% | |||||||
Cablevision Systems Corp.: | |||||||
2,750M | 8.625%, 9/15/2017 | 3,169,375 | |||||
1,525M | 7.75%, 4/15/2018 | 1,715,625 | |||||
CCO Holdings, LLC: | |||||||
1,150M | 7%, 1/15/2019 | 1,220,437 | |||||
850M | 8.125%, 4/30/2020 | 928,625 | |||||
1,175M | 7.375%, 6/1/2020 | 1,274,875 | |||||
650M | 5.25%, 3/15/2021 (a) | 627,250 | |||||
550M | 6.5%, 4/30/2021 | 561,000 | |||||
875M | 5.125%, 2/15/2023 | 807,187 | |||||
3,350M | Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC, 6.375%, 9/15/2020 (a) | 3,433,750 |
54 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Media-Cable TV (continued) | |||||||
Clear Channel Worldwide Holdings, Inc.: | |||||||
$ 200M | 7.625%, 3/15/2020 Series “A” | $ 206,000 | |||||
2,200M | 7.625%, 3/15/2020 Series “B” | 2,282,500 | |||||
1,025M | 6.5%, 11/15/2022 Series “A” | 1,045,500 | |||||
2,375M | 6.5%, 11/15/2022 Series “B” | 2,434,375 | |||||
1,050M | Cogeco Cable, Inc., 4.875%, 5/1/2020 (a) | 1,006,687 | |||||
DISH DBS Corp.: | |||||||
5,075M | 7.875%, 9/1/2019 | 5,810,875 | |||||
950M | 5%, 3/15/2023 | 885,875 | |||||
1,175M | Echostar DBS Corp., 7.125%, 2/1/2016 | 1,293,969 | |||||
3,025M | Gray Television, Inc., 7.5%, 10/1/2020 | 3,161,125 | |||||
3,275M | Harron Communications, LP, 9.125%, 4/1/2020 (a) | 3,618,875 | |||||
1,200M | Lynx II Corp., 6.375%, 4/15/2023 (a) | 1,200,000 | |||||
2,375M | Nara Cable Funding, Ltd., 8.875%, 12/1/2018 (a) | 2,517,500 | |||||
450M | Quebecor Media, Inc., 5.75%, 1/15/2023 | 426,375 | |||||
3,850M | UPC Holding BV, 9.875%, 4/15/2018 (a) | 4,196,500 | |||||
43,824,280 | |||||||
Media-Diversified—1.0% | |||||||
Gannett Co., Inc.: | |||||||
1,425M | 5.125%, 7/15/2020 (a) | 1,403,625 | |||||
1,600M | 6.375%, 10/15/2023 (a)(b) | 1,592,000 | |||||
3,625M | Lamar Media Corp., 7.875%, 4/15/2018 | 3,887,813 | |||||
6,883,438 | |||||||
Metals/Mining—8.0% | |||||||
4,200M | Alcoa, Inc., 6.15%, 8/15/2020 | 4,387,652 | |||||
1,625M | Aleris International, Inc., 7.875%, 11/1/2020 | 1,685,937 | |||||
ArcelorMittal: | |||||||
1,925M | 6.125%, 6/1/2018 | 2,047,719 | |||||
5,206M | 10.35%, 6/1/2019 | 6,429,410 | |||||
1,450M | 6.75%, 2/25/2022 | 1,533,375 | |||||
Arch Coal, Inc.: | |||||||
325M | 7%, 6/15/2019 | 255,125 | |||||
2,475M | 7.25%, 10/1/2020 | 1,887,187 | |||||
2,400M | 7.25%, 6/15/2021 | 1,830,000 | |||||
450M | Coeur d’Alene Mines Corp., 7.875%, 2/1/2021 (a) | 456,750 |
55 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Metals/Mining (continued) | |||||||
FMG Resources (August 2006) Property, Ltd.: | |||||||
$ 1,250M | 6.375%, 2/1/2016 (a) | $ 1,281,250 | |||||
975M | 6%, 4/1/2017 (a) | 1,004,250 | |||||
3,675M | 6.875%, 2/1/2018 (a) | 3,854,156 | |||||
1,525M | 8.25%, 11/1/2019 (a) | 1,650,812 | |||||
450M | 6.875%, 4/1/2022 (a) | 452,250 | |||||
3,725M | JMC Steel Group, 8.25%, 3/15/2018 (a) | 3,659,813 | |||||
1,000M | Kaiser Aluminum Corp., 8.25%, 6/1/2020 | 1,122,500 | |||||
2,100M | Molycorp, Inc., 10%, 6/1/2020 | 2,105,250 | |||||
Novelis, Inc.: | |||||||
4,925M | 8.375%, 12/15/2017 | 5,300,531 | |||||
1,850M | 8.75%, 12/15/2020 | 2,039,625 | |||||
Peabody Energy Corp.: | |||||||
2,050M | 6%, 11/15/2018 | 2,055,125 | |||||
1,700M | 6.5%, 9/15/2020 | 1,683,000 | |||||
2,525M | 6.25%, 11/15/2021 | 2,461,875 | |||||
Steel Dynamics, Inc.: | |||||||
1,200M | 6.125%, 8/15/2019 | 1,257,000 | |||||
675M | 6.375%, 8/15/2022 | 702,000 | |||||
United States Steel Corp.: | |||||||
550M | 7%, 2/1/2018 | 585,750 | |||||
1,275M | 7.375%, 4/1/2020 | 1,316,438 | |||||
900M | 7.5%, 3/15/2022 | 927,000 | |||||
53,971,780 | |||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—.6% | |||||||
1,800M | Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc., 6.75%, 10/15/2022 | 1,944,000 | |||||
2,162M | Taylor Morrison Communities, Inc., 7.75%, 4/15/2020 (a) | 2,372,795 | |||||
4,316,795 | |||||||
Retail-General Merchandise—2.9% | |||||||
2,975M | Landry’s, Inc., 9.375%, 5/1/2020 (a) | 3,153,500 | |||||
2,850M | Limited Brands, Inc., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 3,412,875 | |||||
2,025M | Michaels Stores, Inc., 7.75%, 11/1/2018 | 2,187,000 | |||||
1,975M | Monitronics International, Inc., 9.125%, 4/1/2020 | 2,078,688 | |||||
4,485M | Needle Merger Sub Corp., 8.125%, 3/15/2019 (a) | 4,597,125 | |||||
2,250M | Party City Holdings, Inc., 8.875%, 8/1/2020 (a) | 2,430,000 | |||||
1,525M | Sally Holdings, LLC, 6.875%, 11/15/2019 | 1,677,500 | |||||
19,536,688 |
56 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Services—4.1% | |||||||
ADT Corp.: | |||||||
$ 1,075M | 6.25%, 10/15/2021 (a) | $ 1,092,469 | |||||
1,750M | 3.5%, 7/15/2022 | 1,482,159 | |||||
1,300M | APX Group, Inc., 6.375%, 12/1/2019 (a) | 1,235,000 | |||||
2,050M | CoreLogic, Inc., 7.25%, 6/1/2021 | 2,193,500 | |||||
Covanta Holding Corp.: | |||||||
900M | 7.25%, 12/1/2020 | 969,570 | |||||
2,225M | 6.375%, 10/1/2022 | 2,290,379 | |||||
825M | Geo Group, Inc., 5.875%, 1/15/2022 (a)(b) | 817,781 | |||||
2,150M | H&E Equipment Services, Inc., 7%, 9/1/2022 | 2,300,500 | |||||
Iron Mountain, Inc.: | |||||||
1,525M | 7.75%, 10/1/2019 | 1,683,219 | |||||
3,250M | 5.75%, 8/15/2024 | 2,941,250 | |||||
2,450M | Live Nation Entertainment, Inc., 7%, 9/1/2020 (a) | 2,569,438 | |||||
PHH Corp.: | |||||||
1,350M | 7.375%, 9/1/2019 | 1,424,250 | |||||
1,500M | 6.375%, 8/15/2021 | 1,458,750 | |||||
2,925M | Reliance Intermediate Holdings, LP, 9.5%, 12/15/2019 (a) | 3,210,188 | |||||
525M | Rent-A-Center, Inc., 4.75%, 5/1/2021 (a) | 490,875 | |||||
1,625M | Safway Group Holding, LLC, 7%, 5/15/2018 (a) | 1,657,500 | |||||
27,816,828 | |||||||
Telecommunications—6.1% | |||||||
CenturyLink, Inc.: | |||||||
400M | 5.625%, 4/1/2020 | 392,500 | |||||
1,500M | 5.8%, 3/15/2022 | 1,421,250 | |||||
Citizens Communications Co.: | |||||||
5,200M | 7.125%, 3/15/2019 | 5,544,500 | |||||
2,175M | 9%, 8/15/2031 | 2,142,375 | |||||
325M | Frontier Communications Corp., 8.5%, 4/15/2020 | 360,750 | |||||
2,525M | GCI, Inc., 8.625%, 11/15/2019 | 2,657,562 | |||||
5,850M | Inmarsat Finance, PLC, 7.375%, 12/1/2017 (a) | 6,157,125 | |||||
Intelsat Jackson Holdings SA: | |||||||
2,050M | 7.25%, 4/1/2019 | 2,203,750 | |||||
1,200M | 8.5%, 11/1/2019 | 1,311,000 | |||||
2,075M | 7.25%, 10/15/2020 | 2,225,438 | |||||
800M | PAETEC Holding Corp., 9.875%, 12/1/2018 | 894,000 | |||||
1,125M | Qwest Communications International, Inc., 7.125%, 4/1/2018 | 1,168,594 | |||||
Sprint Capital Corp.: | |||||||
2,000M | 6.9%, 5/1/2019 | 2,065,000 | |||||
3,125M | 6.875%, 11/15/2028 | 2,804,688 |
57 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Telecommunications (continued) | |||||||
$ 1,700M | Telesat Canada, 6%, 5/15/2017 (a) | $ 1,774,375 | |||||
Wind Acquisition Finance SA: | |||||||
750M | 11.75%, 7/15/2017 (a) | 797,813 | |||||
2,175M | 7.25%, 2/15/2018 (a) | 2,262,000 | |||||
Windstream Corp.: | |||||||
1,725M | 7.875%, 11/1/2017 | 1,932,000 | |||||
2,050M | 7.75%, 10/15/2020 | 2,126,875 | |||||
600M | 6.375%, 8/1/2023 | 552,000 | |||||
40,793,595 | |||||||
Transportation—1.0% | |||||||
3,625M | Aircastle, Ltd., 6.25%, 12/1/2019 | 3,851,562 | |||||
Navios Maritime Holdings: | |||||||
1,575M | 8.875%, 11/1/2017 | 1,653,750 | |||||
1,200M | 8.125%, 2/15/2019 | 1,197,000 | |||||
6,702,312 | |||||||
Utilities—3.1% | |||||||
AES Corp.: | |||||||
875M | 9.75%, 4/15/2016 | 1,025,937 | |||||
800M | 8%, 10/15/2017 | 924,000 | |||||
1,275M | 7.375%, 7/1/2021 | 1,408,875 | |||||
3,025M | Atlantic Power Corp., 9%, 11/15/2018 | 3,055,250 | |||||
Calpine Corp.: | |||||||
331M | 7.875%, 7/31/2020 (a) | 358,307 | |||||
2,625M | 7.5%, 2/15/2021 (a) | 2,802,187 | |||||
2,100M | Dynegy, Inc., 5.875%, 6/1/2023 (a) | 1,921,500 | |||||
1,138M | Indiantown Cogeneration Utilities, LP, 9.77%, 12/15/2020 | 1,253,434 | |||||
2,575M | InterGen NV, 7%, 6/30/2023 (a) | 2,587,875 | |||||
2,350M | NRG Energy, Inc., 7.625%, 5/15/2019 | 2,491,000 | |||||
3,010M | NSG Holdings, LLC, 7.75%, 12/15/2025 (a) | 3,175,550 | |||||
21,003,915 | |||||||
Waste Management—.3% | |||||||
2,050M | ADS Waste Holdings, Inc., 8.25%, 10/1/2020 (a) | 2,173,000 |
58 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Wireless Communications—3.1% | |||||||
$ 2,800M | Intelsat Luxembourg SA, 8.125%, 6/1/2023 (a) | $ 2,964,500 | |||||
MetroPCS Wireless, Inc.: | |||||||
1,200M | 6.625%, 11/15/2020 | 1,248,000 | |||||
4,100M | 6.25%, 4/1/2021 (a) | 4,135,875 | |||||
2,275M | 6.625%, 4/1/2023 (a) | 2,289,219 | |||||
3,175M | SoftBank Corp., 4.5%, 4/15/2020 (a) | 3,051,969 | |||||
1,200M | Sprint Corp., 7.875%, 9/15/2023 (a) | 1,227,000 | |||||
Sprint Nextel Corp.: | |||||||
925M | 9.125%, 3/1/2017 | 1,068,375 | |||||
1,250M | 8.375%, 8/15/2017 | 1,418,750 | |||||
1,425M | 7%, 8/15/2020 | 1,457,063 | |||||
1,750M | 6%, 11/15/2022 | 1,618,750 | |||||
20,479,501 | |||||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $590,803,980) | 599,613,549 | ||||||
LOAN PARTICIPATIONS—8.3% | |||||||
Automotive—.3% | |||||||
2,263M | Chrysler Group, LLC, 4.25%, 5/24/2017 (e) | 2,287,938 | |||||
Chemicals—.4% | |||||||
2,811M | Dupont Performance Coatings, Inc., 4.75%, 2/1/2020 (e) | 2,834,886 | |||||
Consumer Non-Durables—.3% | |||||||
1,841M | Sun Products Corp., 5.5%, 3/15/2020 (e) | 1,806,236 | |||||
Energy—1.0% | |||||||
1,000M | Fieldwood Energy, LLC, 8.375%, 9/30/2020 (b)(e) | 1,002,500 | |||||
Ocean Rig Drillships Financing Holding, Inc.: | |||||||
1,800M | 6%, 2/2/2021 (e) | 1,818,000 | |||||
2,125M | 6%, 3/31/2021 (e) | 2,146,250 | |||||
1,925M | Samson Investment Co., 6%, 9/25/2018 (e) | 1,935,828 | |||||
6,902,578 | |||||||
Financial—.5% | |||||||
2,970M | Ocwen Financial Corp., 5%, 1/31/2018 (e) | 3,009,675 |
59 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Food/Drug—1.5% | |||||||
$ 3,905M | Albertson’s, LLC, 4.75%, 2/20/2016 (e) | $ 3,907,816 | |||||
Rite Aid Corp.: | |||||||
1,315M | 4.875%, 6/7/2021 (e) | 1,320,918 | |||||
1,900M | 4.875%, 6/21/2021 (e) | 1,908,550 | |||||
Supervalu, Inc.: | |||||||
2,685M | 5%, 3/21/2019 (e) | 2,688,298 | |||||
186M | 5%, 3/31/2019 (e) | 186,051 | |||||
10,011,633 | |||||||
Forest Products/Containers—.3% | |||||||
1,990M | Sealed Air Corp., 4%, 10/31/2019 (e) | 2,006,971 | |||||
Gaming/Leisure—.2% | |||||||
1,566M | Seminole Hard Rock Entertainment, Inc., 3.5%, 4/28/2020 (e) | 1,564,117 | |||||
Health Care—.5% | |||||||
3,126M | Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc., 4.5%, 6/26/2020 (e) | 3,150,995 | |||||
Information Technology—1.0% | |||||||
2,174M | ARRIS Group, Inc., 3.5%, 2/7/2020 (e) | 2,162,298 | |||||
4,800M | BMC Software Finance, Inc., 5%, 8/9/2020 (e) | 4,806,748 | |||||
6,969,046 | |||||||
Manufacturing—.9% | |||||||
2,224M | Apex Tool Group, LLC, 4.5%, 1/8/2020 (e) | 2,232,563 | |||||
3,685M | Gardner Denver, Inc., 4.25%, 7/30/2020 (e) | 3,661,968 | |||||
5,894,531 | |||||||
Media-Diversified—.2% | |||||||
1,150M | Kasima, LLC, 3.25%, 5/14/2021 (e) | 1,146,886 | |||||
Metals/Mining—.6% | |||||||
2,839M | Arch Coal, Inc., 5.75%, 5/16/2018 (e) | 2,775,194 | |||||
1,280M | Oxbow Carbon & Minerals, LLC, 8%, 1/18/2020 (e) | 1,299,200 | |||||
4,074,394 | |||||||
Retail-General Merchandise—.6% | |||||||
1,238M | Burger King Corp., 3.75%, 9/27/2019 (e) | 1,243,043 | |||||
2,694M | General Nutrition Centers, Inc., 3.75%, 3/2/2018 (e) | 2,714,911 | |||||
3,957,954 | |||||||
Total Value of Loan Participations (cost $55,290,532) | 55,617,840 |
60 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
COMMON STOCKS—.0% | |||||||
Automotive—.0% | |||||||
2,523 | * | Safelite Realty Corporation (c) | $ 3,785 | ||||
Telecommunications—.0% | |||||||
18,224 | * | World Access, Inc. (c) | — | ||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $385,770) | 3,785 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $646,480,282) | 97.6 | % | 655,235,174 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 2.4 | 15,944,882 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $671,180,056 |
* | Non-income producing |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
(b) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis |
(see Note 1G). | |
(c) | Securities valued at fair value (see Note 1A) |
(d) | In default as to principal and/or interest payment |
(e) | Interest rates are determined and reset periodically. The interest rates above are the rates in effect |
at September 30, 2013. |
61 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2013
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observ- | |
able for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include | ||
quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar | ||
instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates | ||
and similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | $ | — | $ | 599,613,549 | $ | — | $ | 599,613,549 | ||||
Loan Participations | — | 55,617,840 | — | 55,617,840 | ||||||||
Common Stocks | — | — | 3,785 | 3,785 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | — | $ | 655,231,389 | $ | 3,785 | $ | 655,235,174 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization of corporate bonds, |
loan participations and common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
62 |
The following is a reconciliation of Fund investments valued using Level 3 inputs for the period:
Investments | Investments | |||||||||||
in | in | |||||||||||
Corporate | Common | |||||||||||
Bonds | Stocks | Total | ||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2012 | $ | 2,750 | $ | 25 | $ | 2,775 | ||||||
Purchases | — | — | — | |||||||||
Sales | — | (8) | (8) | |||||||||
Change in unrealized | ||||||||||||
appreciation (depreciation) | (2,750) | 3,760 | 1,010 | |||||||||
Realized gain | — | 8 | 8 | |||||||||
Transfer into Level 3 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Transfer out of Level 3 | — | — | — | |||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2013 | $ | — | $ | 3,785 | $ | 3,785 | ||||||
The following is a summary of Level 3 inputs by industry: | ||||||||||||
Health Care | $ | — | ||||||||||
Automotive | 3,785 | |||||||||||
Telecommunications | — | |||||||||||
$ | 3,785 |
The following table presents additional information about valuation methodologies and inputs used for investments that are measured at fair value and categorized within Level 3 as of September 30, 2013.
Impact to | ||||||||||
Valuation | ||||||||||
Fair Value | from and | |||||||||
September 30, | Valuation | Unobservable | Increase in | |||||||
2013 | Methodologies | Input(s)(1) | Range | Input(2) | ||||||
Corporate Bonds | $ | — | Market | Market | 100% | Increase | ||||
Comparables | Comparables/ | |||||||||
Bankruptcy | ||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 3,785 | Market | Market | 100% | Increase | ||||
Comparables | Comparables/ | |||||||||
Bankruptcy |
(1) | In determining certain of these inputs, Management evaluates a variety of factors including |
economic conditions, industry and market developments, market valuations of comparable | |
companies and company specific developments including exit strategies and realization oppor- | |
tunities. Management has determined that market participants would take these inputs into | |
account when valuing the investments. | |
(2) | This column represents the directional change in the fair value of the Level 3 investments |
that would result from an increase to the corresponding unobservable input. A decrease to the | |
unobservable input would have the opposite effect. |
63 |
Portfolio Composition (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2013
The dollar weighted average of credit ratings of all bonds held by the Fund during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, computed on a monthly basis, are set forth below. This information reflects the average composition of the Fund’s assets during the 2013 fiscal year and is not necessarily representative of the Fund as of the end of its 2013 fiscal year, the current fiscal year or at any other time in the future.
Comparable Quality of | ||
Rated by | Unrated Securities to | |
Moody’s | Bonds Rated by Moody’s | |
A1 | 0.00% | 0.00 |
A2 | 0.11 | 0.00 |
Baa1 | 0.20 | 0.00 |
Baa2 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
Baa3 | 2.73 | 0.00 |
Ba1 | 4.89 | 0.00 |
Ba2 | 11.60 | 0.00 |
Ba3 | 12.99 | 0.00 |
BB+ | 0.00 | 0.28 |
BB | 0.00 | 0.53 |
BB- | 0.00 | 0.24 |
B+ | 0.00 | 0.17 |
B | 0.00 | 2.13 |
B- | 0.00 | 0.48 |
B1 | 25.34 | 0.00 |
B2 | 17.22 | 0.00 |
B3 | 17.09 | 0.00 |
Caa1 | 5.47 | 0.00 |
Caa2 | 0.39 | 0.00 |
Caa3 | 0.29 | 0.00 |
Caa | 1.07 | 0.00 |
64 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
TOTAL RETURN FUND
Dear Investor:
We are pleased to send you the First Investors Total Return Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 13.8% for Class A shares and 13.0% for Class B shares, including capital gain distributions of 24.5 cents per share for both Class A and Class B shares and including dividends of 33.6 cents per share on Class A shares and 21.6 cents per share on Class B shares. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 5.9% for Advisor Class shares and 6.0% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 16.5 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 17.0 cents per share on Institutional Class shares. The Fund’s performance this year was driven in substantial part by its policy of allocating its assets among equities, fixed income investments and cash. On average during the year, the Fund maintained allocations of 60% in equities, 36% in fixed income and 4% in cash. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
During the review period, long-term interest rates began climbing upwards from historically low levels due to market concerns that the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) would taper — or decrease — its stimulus program.
Key economic indicators, including stronger housing and jobs-related data, further convinced the market that the Fed’s monetary policy would become less accommodative. Treasury yields rose to their highest level in two years and fixed-income sectors came under pressure due to a potential “great rotation” into equities.
Towards the end of the review period, the Fed provided some relief to the market when it announced that its stimulus tapering plans were on hold. Reviewing benchmark U.S. Treasury yields, the two-year U.S. Treasury note yield — which is anchored by the Fed’s very accommodative monetary policy — rose 8 basis points (0.08%), ending the period at 0.32%. In contrast, the 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield rose sharply from 1.63% to 2.61%.
Fixed Income
The broad U.S. bond market returned –1.77%, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Riskier fixed-income sectors had very strong performance, predominantly from those that provide less interest-rate sensitivity. Consequently, high yield — or “junk” bonds — returned 7.09%, while investment-grade corporate bonds returned –1.27%.
Higher quality sectors had negative returns. The broad mortgage-backed securities market returned –1.20%; the Treasury market returned –2.54%; while the 10 year and longer Treasury securities returned –10.32%, due to rising long-term interest rates.
During the review period, the Fund had average bond and cash allocations of 36.6% and 3.7%, respectively. As a percentage of the Fund’s total assets, corporate bonds were the largest bond allocation at 25.9%, followed by mortgage-backed securities at 5.9%, U.S. government securities at 3.6%, and municipal bonds at 1.2%. Corporate bond security
65 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
selection was a positive contributor to Fund performance as was the Fund’s overweight in corporate bonds and underweight in U.S. government securities.
Equities
During the period under review, strong equity performance and market rally were driven by a combination of slow but gradually improving economic conditions, accommodative monetary policy from the Fed, low volatility and improving corporate fundamentals.
Investor sentiment also improved, with stocks benefiting from a positive re-rating of market-valuation metrics toward more normalized historical levels, which erased the bearish views toward stocks that prevailed after the 2008–2009 market correction.
Despite numerous challenges throughout the year — including worries over whether or not the Fed would “taper” its bond buying stimulus of the economy; disagreements between President Obama and the U.S. Congress on government budget and spending matters; and geopolitical conflicts around the globe — equity markets remained resilient and investors’ restored confidence barely wavered.
This year’s market results were broadly positive overall, with all market sectors, styles and sizes participating. Companies with strong profitability, earnings growth, solid balance sheets and strong, free cash-flows led results. Small and mid-cap stocks flourished, as investors felt comfortable adding more risk to their portfolios. Companies with the ability to pay and raise dividends and execute share repurchases of their own stocks were also rewarded. Mergers and acquisitions also continued to drive strong performance.
These conditions produced a solid year for the Fund, which continued to invest across all market capitalization segments, allocating 68% of equity holdings to large cap, 17% to mid-cap and 15% to small-cap stocks as of September 30, 2013. (Ranges defined by Lipper).
All segments produced positive returns, with large cap slightly exceeding the benchmark and small and mid-cap outperforming strongly. Results were also buoyed by the Fund’s selection of consumer discretionary, industrials, healthcare and consumer stocks — all sectors in which the Fund was overweighted relative to the benchmark.
The Fund’s top consumer discretionary performers all generated strong earnings: CBS Corporation — up 53% — enjoyed strong broadcast ratings that produced higher earnings. CBS opened new revenue streams by reselling its programming to internet services and leveraging its content via increased syndication and international distribution deals.
Auto-components supplier Delphi Automotive was up 90%, thanks to higher global automotive sales and an ever-expanding supply of digital content delivered through the center console.
Best Buy Co. — the leading consumer electronics retailer — also stood out, gaining 125% due to improved sales practices, a more competitive stance toward internet retailers, and cuts in unnecessary costs, among other changes.
66 |
Within industrials, several investments benefited the Fund’s performance. Longtime holdings TAL International and Textainer Group Holdings — both of which lease freight containers — benefited from increased global trade, solid utilization, and a continued tight global supply of shipping containers. The stocks returned 45% and 30%, respectively.
In the home and industrials sector, standby generator maker Generac Holdings soared 108%, thanks to an improved housing market and market share gains.
Longtime holdings of industrial-conglomerates Honeywell, United Technologies, 3M, ITT and Pentair also contributed strongly to the Fund’s results.
In healthcare, three names stood out: Shares of Gilead Sciences were up 90%, with strong performance by its HIV-drug portfolio and blockbuster potential exhibited by its new hepatitis drug. Shares of Thermo Fisher — a leading maker of diagnostic life sciences products — rallied 58% on its successful merger with competitor Life Technologies. And global generic and branded pharmaceutical maker Actavis, rose 69% on its takeover of fund-holding Warner Chilcott (up 73%), with synergies and cost savings foretelling significantly enhanced future earnings.
Occupying the Fund’s top spot for performance was its long-term holding in the consumer direct seller, Nu Skin Enterprises, which was up 149% for the period. Nu Skin was the Fund’s most significant contributor to Fund returns. Global sales of its Age-Loc skincare products continued to soar and the rollout of a new weight management product was enthusiastically received, propelling the firm to record profits.
On a relative basis, the Fund’s equities performed well, beating its benchmark. It did underperform the S&P 500 Index within the financials sector, where the Fund remains underweight. With seemingly no end to quantitative easing and increased costs from greater regulation now looking permanent, financial-sector profits and growth prospects remain anemic, impacting the ability of these companies to raise dividends and repurchase stock.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
67 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.22% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,053.01 | $ 6.28 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.95 | $ 6.17 | |
Class B Shares | 2.01% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,049.24 | $10.33 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.99 | $10.15 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.01% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,058.94 | $ 5.21 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.01 | $ 5.11 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.82% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,059.81 | $ 4.23 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.96 | $ 4.15 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total market value of investments.
68 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Total Return Fund (Class A shares), the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 13.77% | 12.98% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 9.56% | 8.81% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 6.96% | 6.56% | 5.89% | 5.98% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 7.20% | 8.98% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 8.27% | 8.52% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 6.33% | 6.56% | 5.89% | 5.98% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Total Return Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/03 with theoretical investments in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Indices”). The BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Index tracks the performance of U.S. dollar denominated investment grade debt publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market, including U.S. Treasuries, quasi-government, corporate and residential mortgage pass-through securities. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the
69 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for Ten Years would have been 6.30%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Ten Years would have been 6.54%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 2.14%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 2.45%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Master Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and Standard & Poor’s 500 Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations).
70 |
Portfolio of Investments
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
COMMON STOCKS—59.8% | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary—9.7% | |||||||
112,900 | Best Buy Company, Inc. | $ 4,233,750 | |||||
34,000 | BorgWarner, Inc. | 3,447,260 | |||||
112,000 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 6,177,920 | |||||
211,800 | Dana Holding Corporation | 4,837,512 | |||||
81,600 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 4,767,072 | |||||
104,100 | GNC Holdings, Inc. – Class “A” | 5,686,983 | |||||
39,100 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 2,589,593 | |||||
42,300 | Home Depot, Inc. | 3,208,455 | |||||
67,000 | * | Jarden Corporation | 3,242,800 | ||||
85,900 | L Brands, Inc. | 5,248,490 | |||||
27,800 | Lear Corporation | 1,989,646 | |||||
27,300 | McDonald’s Corporation | 2,626,533 | |||||
89,400 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 2,458,500 | |||||
80,200 | * | Orient-Express Hotels, Ltd. – Class “A” | 1,040,996 | ||||
115,700 | Pier 1 Imports, Inc. | 2,258,464 | |||||
79,900 | * | Select Comfort Corporation | 1,945,565 | ||||
39,900 | * | Steiner Leisure, Ltd. | 2,331,357 | ||||
31,600 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 2,253,396 | ||||
22,300 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 1,926,051 | |||||
49,060 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 2,991,188 | |||||
65,261,531 | |||||||
Consumer Staples—5.7% | |||||||
109,800 | Altria Group, Inc. | 3,771,630 | |||||
87,300 | * | Amira Nature Foods, Ltd. | 1,129,662 | ||||
117,300 | Avon Products, Inc. | 2,416,380 | |||||
114,300 | Coca-Cola Company | 4,329,684 | |||||
72,700 | CVS Caremark Corporation | 4,125,725 | |||||
32,400 | Herbalife, Ltd. | 2,260,548 | |||||
72,600 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 6,950,724 | |||||
29,100 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 2,313,450 | |||||
72,100 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 6,243,139 | |||||
26,700 | Procter & Gamble Company | 2,018,253 | |||||
38,600 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 2,854,856 | |||||
38,414,051 |
71 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Energy—5.9% | |||||||
36,900 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | $ 3,431,331 | |||||
20,200 | Chevron Corporation | 2,454,300 | |||||
61,500 | ConocoPhillips | 4,274,865 | |||||
26,000 | Devon Energy Corporation | 1,501,760 | |||||
56,300 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 3,026,125 | |||||
62,927 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 5,414,239 | |||||
8,200 | Hess Corporation | 634,188 | |||||
1,897 | Hugoton Royalty Trust | 14,171 | |||||
94,886 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 3,309,624 | |||||
38,843 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 2,498,382 | |||||
37,300 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 2,913,503 | |||||
116,700 | Noble Corporation | 4,407,759 | |||||
31,400 | Phillips 66 | 1,815,548 | |||||
13,100 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 1,157,516 | |||||
79,400 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 2,840,932 | |||||
39,694,243 | |||||||
Financials—5.9% | |||||||
60,100 | American Express Company | 4,538,752 | |||||
37,400 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 3,406,392 | |||||
32,500 | Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (REIT) | 322,075 | |||||
76,850 | Discover Financial Services | 3,883,999 | |||||
27,300 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 543,816 | |||||
59,000 | FirstMerit Corporation | 1,280,890 | |||||
50,600 | * | Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. – Class “A” | 604,670 | ||||
22,100 | Invesco, Ltd. | 704,990 | |||||
104,500 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 5,401,605 | |||||
34,000 | M&T Bank Corporation | 3,805,280 | |||||
26,000 | MetLife, Inc. | 1,220,700 | |||||
23,700 | Morgan Stanley | 638,715 | |||||
43,600 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 3,158,820 | |||||
27,300 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 973,245 | |||||
97,672 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 1,244,341 | |||||
93,300 | U.S. Bancorp | 3,412,914 | |||||
100,500 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 1,997,940 | |||||
62,600 | Wells Fargo & Company | 2,586,632 | |||||
39,725,776 |
72 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Health Care—7.7% | |||||||
92,200 | Abbott Laboratories | $ 3,060,118 | |||||
63,000 | AbbVie, Inc. | 2,817,990 | |||||
28,600 | * | Actavis, Inc. | 4,118,400 | ||||
26,200 | Baxter International, Inc. | 1,721,078 | |||||
20,800 | Covidien, PLC | 1,267,552 | |||||
54,617 | * | Express Scripts Holding Company | 3,374,238 | ||||
102,300 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 6,428,532 | ||||
71,700 | Johnson & Johnson | 6,215,673 | |||||
2,600 | * | Mallinckrodt, PLC | 114,634 | ||||
15,900 | McKesson Corporation | 2,039,970 | |||||
79,800 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 3,799,278 | |||||
36,400 | Omnicare, Inc. | 2,020,200 | |||||
219,434 | Pfizer, Inc. | 6,299,950 | |||||
68,200 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 6,284,630 | |||||
69,400 | Warner Chilcott, PLC – Class “A” | 1,585,790 | |||||
27,972 | Zoetis, Inc. | 870,489 | |||||
52,018,522 | |||||||
Industrials—8.5% | |||||||
48,600 | 3M Company | 5,803,326 | |||||
20,900 | * | ADT Corporation | 849,794 | ||||
65,500 | Altra Holdings, Inc. | 1,762,605 | |||||
33,800 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 1,857,648 | ||||
29,100 | Caterpillar, Inc. | 2,426,067 | |||||
40,900 | Chicago Bridge & Iron Company NV – NY Shares | 2,771,793 | |||||
39,100 | Dover Corporation | 3,512,353 | |||||
14,500 | * | Esterline Technologies Corporation | 1,158,405 | ||||
100,200 | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 4,272,528 | |||||
101,000 | General Electric Company | 2,412,890 | |||||
56,800 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 4,716,672 | |||||
31,100 | ITT Corporation | 1,118,045 | |||||
7,200 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 918,360 | |||||
59,900 | Pentair, Ltd. | 3,889,906 | |||||
5,600 | Raytheon Company | 431,592 | |||||
37,800 | Ryder System, Inc. | 2,256,660 | |||||
27,300 | Snap-on, Inc. | 2,716,350 | |||||
77,300 | * | TAL International Group, Inc. | 3,612,229 | ||||
35,800 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 1,355,746 | |||||
24,950 | Triumph Group, Inc. | 1,751,989 |
73 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Industrials (continued) | |||||||
98,075 | Tyco International, Ltd. | $ 3,430,663 | |||||
42,200 | United Technologies Corporation | 4,550,004 | |||||
57,575,625 | |||||||
Information Technology—10.8% | |||||||
13,000 | Apple, Inc. | 6,197,750 | |||||
92,500 | * | ARRIS Group, Inc. | 1,578,050 | ||||
47,400 | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 2,043,888 | |||||
41,400 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 994,842 | ||||
48,700 | * | CDW Corporation | 1,111,821 | ||||
230,700 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 5,402,994 | |||||
25,600 | * | eBay, Inc. | 1,428,224 | ||||
192,100 | EMC Corporation | 4,910,076 | |||||
108,700 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 2,280,526 | |||||
154,200 | Intel Corporation | 3,534,264 | |||||
40,900 | International Business Machines Corporation | 7,573,862 | |||||
110,800 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 1,244,284 | |||||
153,600 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 3,589,632 | |||||
229,000 | Microsoft Corporation | 7,627,990 | |||||
75,600 | * | NeuStar, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,740,688 | ||||
94,700 | Oracle Corporation | 3,141,199 | |||||
39,400 | * | PTC, Inc. | 1,120,142 | ||||
81,300 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 5,476,368 | |||||
119,900 | Symantec Corporation | 2,967,525 | |||||
97,700 | * | Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 1,774,232 | ||||
59,300 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 3,070,554 | |||||
67,300 | * | Yahoo!, Inc. | 2,231,668 | ||||
73,040,579 | |||||||
Materials—4.2% | |||||||
42,800 | Celanese Corporation – Series “A” | 2,259,412 | |||||
42,400 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 3,449,664 | |||||
41,600 | Eastman Chemical Company | 3,240,640 | |||||
101,000 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 3,341,080 | |||||
97,000 | International Paper Company | 4,345,600 | |||||
60,300 | LyondellBasell Industries NV – Class “A” | 4,415,769 | |||||
11,100 | Praxair, Inc. | 1,334,331 | |||||
45,900 | Rock-Tenn Company – Class “A” | 4,648,293 | |||||
35,500 | RPM International, Inc. | 1,285,100 | |||||
28,319,889 |
74 |
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Telecommunication Services—1.3% | |||||||
114,500 | AT&T, Inc. | $ 3,872,390 | |||||
103,500 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 4,829,310 | |||||
8,701,700 | |||||||
Utilities—.1% | |||||||
13,000 | Atmos Energy Corporation | 553,670 | |||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $254,977,069) | 403,305,586 | ||||||
CORPORATE BONDS—24.6% | |||||||
Aerospace/Defense—.3% | |||||||
$ 1,000M | BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 4.95%, 6/1/2014 (a) | 1,025,615 | |||||
1,000M | United Technologies Corp., 6.125%, 2/1/2019 | 1,194,349 | |||||
2,219,964 | |||||||
Agriculture—.2% | |||||||
1,000M | Cargill, Inc., 6%, 11/27/2017 (a) | 1,153,562 | |||||
Automotive—.3% | |||||||
1,000M | Daimler Finance NA, LLC, 2.95%, 1/11/2017 (a) | 1,036,543 | |||||
1,000M | Johnson Controls, Inc., 5%, 3/30/2020 | 1,097,858 | |||||
2,134,401 | |||||||
Chemicals—.7% | |||||||
1,500M | CF Industries, Inc., 7.125%, 5/1/2020 | 1,760,905 | |||||
1,500M | Dow Chemical Co., 4.25%, 11/15/2020 | 1,571,511 | |||||
1,000M | LyondellBasell Industries NV, 6%, 11/15/2021 | 1,143,195 | |||||
4,475,611 | |||||||
Consumer Durables—.3% | |||||||
1,000M | Black & Decker Corp., 5.75%, 11/15/2016 | 1,135,839 | |||||
1,000M | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4.7%, 8/15/2020 | 1,066,842 | |||||
2,202,681 | |||||||
Energy—2.2% | |||||||
1,500M | Canadian Oil Sands, Ltd., 7.75%, 5/15/2019 (a) | 1,822,888 | |||||
1,000M | DCP Midstream, LLC, 9.75%, 3/15/2019 (a) | 1,275,398 | |||||
1,500M | Enbridge Energy Partners, LP, 4.2%, 9/15/2021 | 1,523,068 | |||||
1,000M | Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, LP, 3.45%, 2/15/2023 | 937,038 | |||||
1,000M | Nabors Industries, Inc., 6.15%, 2/15/2018 | 1,125,598 | |||||
1,000M | ONEOK Partners, LP, 3.375%, 10/1/2022 | 922,974 |
75 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Energy (continued) | |||||||
$ 1,000M | Petrobras International Finance Co., 5.375%, 1/27/2021 | $ 1,009,585 | |||||
1,000M | Reliance Holdings USA, Inc., 4.5%, 10/19/2020 (a) | 988,560 | |||||
500M | Spectra Energy Capital, LLC, 6.2%, 4/15/2018 | 574,318 | |||||
1,000M | Suncor Energy, Inc., 6.1%, 6/1/2018 | 1,172,586 | |||||
1,500M | Valero Energy Corp., 9.375%, 3/15/2019 | 1,945,475 | |||||
1,500M | Weatherford International, Inc., 6.35%, 6/15/2017 | 1,684,469 | |||||
14,981,957 | |||||||
Financial Services—3.4% | |||||||
1,500M | Aflac, Inc., 8.5%, 5/15/2019 | 1,941,024 | |||||
American Express Co.: | |||||||
500M | 6.15%, 8/28/2017 | 583,458 | |||||
1,000M | 7%, 3/19/2018 | 1,205,977 | |||||
American International Group, Inc.: | |||||||
750M | 4.875%, 9/15/2016 | 822,114 | |||||
750M | 8.25%, 8/15/2018 | 937,061 | |||||
1,500M | Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 5.3%, 3/15/2020 | 1,707,319 | |||||
1,000M | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 3.4%, 1/31/2022 | 1,005,584 | |||||
1,500M | BlackRock, Inc., 5%, 12/10/2019 | 1,704,010 | |||||
1,000M | Caterpillar Financial Services Corp., 5.85%, 9/1/2017 | 1,154,542 | |||||
1,000M | CoBank, ACB, 7.875%, 4/16/2018 (a) | 1,221,225 | |||||
1,000M | ERAC USA Finance Co., 4.5%, 8/16/2021 (a) | 1,044,957 | |||||
1,500M | Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC, 8.125%, 1/15/2020 | 1,871,046 | |||||
General Electric Capital Corp.: | |||||||
1,000M | 5.625%, 9/15/2017 | 1,140,497 | |||||
2,000M | 5.3%, 2/11/2021 | 2,178,490 | |||||
1,000M | Harley-Davidson Funding Corp., 5.75%, 12/15/2014 (a) | 1,054,650 | |||||
1,000M | Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 4.95%, 5/1/2022 (a) | 1,035,856 | |||||
1,000M | Protective Life Corp., 7.375%, 10/15/2019 | 1,210,635 | |||||
1,000M | Prudential Financial, Inc., 7.375%, 6/15/2019 | 1,239,746 | |||||
23,058,191 | |||||||
Financials—3.9% | |||||||
Bank of America Corp.: | |||||||
2,000M | 5.65%, 5/1/2018 | 2,259,352 | |||||
500M | 5%, 5/13/2021 | 537,869 | |||||
Barclays Bank, PLC: | |||||||
1,500M | 6.75%, 5/22/2019 | 1,794,373 | |||||
1,000M | 5.125%, 1/8/2020 | 1,117,925 |
76 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Financials (continued) | |||||||
Citigroup, Inc.: | |||||||
$ 1,000M | 4.45%, 1/10/2017 | $ 1,083,597 | |||||
1,500M | 6.125%, 11/21/2017 | 1,726,567 | |||||
1,500M | Fifth Third Bancorp, 3.5%, 3/15/2022 | 1,484,580 | |||||
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: | |||||||
2,100M | 6.15%, 4/1/2018 | 2,404,265 | |||||
1,000M | 3.625%, 1/22/2023 | 958,120 | |||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co.: | |||||||
2,500M | 6%, 1/15/2018 | 2,873,553 | |||||
1,000M | 4.5%, 1/24/2022 | 1,044,909 | |||||
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.: | |||||||
500M | 5%, 1/15/2015 | 525,105 | |||||
1,000M | 6.4%, 8/28/2017 | 1,150,949 | |||||
1,800M | Morgan Stanley, 6.625%, 4/1/2018 | 2,091,787 | |||||
1,000M | Siemens Financieringsmaatschappij NV, 5.75%, 10/17/2016 (a) | 1,137,545 | |||||
1,000M | SunTrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 9/11/2017 | 1,146,085 | |||||
1,000M | UBS AG, 4.875%, 8/4/2020 | 1,119,517 | |||||
1,500M | Wells Fargo & Co., 4.6%, 4/1/2021 | 1,631,421 | |||||
26,087,519 | |||||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—2.4% | |||||||
1,500M | Altria Group, Inc., 9.7%, 11/10/2018 | 1,985,134 | |||||
1,000M | Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc., 6.875%, 11/15/2019 | 1,242,540 | |||||
1,000M | Bottling Group, LLC, 5.125%, 1/15/2019 | 1,138,972 | |||||
1,500M | Bunge Ltd. Finance Corp., 8.5%, 6/15/2019 | 1,869,924 | |||||
1,000M | ConAgra Foods, Inc., 5.875%, 4/15/2014 | 1,027,773 | |||||
1,000M | Diageo Capital, PLC, 5.75%, 10/23/2017 | 1,150,651 | |||||
1,000M | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 6.82%, 5/1/2018 | 1,199,418 | |||||
1,000M | Ingredion, Inc., 4.625%, 11/1/2020 | 1,060,804 | |||||
1,500M | Lorillard Tobacco Co., 6.875%, 5/1/2020 | 1,727,330 | |||||
1,000M | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co., 4.9%, 11/1/2019 | 1,108,068 | |||||
1,000M | Philip Morris International, Inc., 5.65%, 5/16/2018 | 1,158,608 | |||||
1,500M | SABMiller Holdings, Inc., 3.75%, 1/15/2022 (a) | 1,514,619 | |||||
16,183,841 | |||||||
Food/Drug—.2% | |||||||
1,500M | Safeway, Inc., 4.75%, 12/1/2021 | 1,508,763 | |||||
Forest Products/Containers—.2% | |||||||
1,000M | International Paper Co., 9.375%, 5/15/2019 | 1,320,245 |
77 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Gaming/Leisure—.1% | |||||||
$ 1,000M | Marriott International, Inc., 3.25%, 9/15/2022 | $ 948,206 | |||||
Health Care—1.3% | |||||||
1,500M | Biogen IDEC, Inc., 6.875%, 3/1/2018 | 1,782,471 | |||||
1,500M | Express Scripts Holding Co., 4.75%, 11/15/2021 | 1,608,173 | |||||
1,000M | Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings, 3.75%, 8/23/2022 | 976,137 | |||||
1,000M | Mylan, Inc., 3.125%, 1/15/2023 (a) | 911,358 | |||||
1,000M | Novartis Securities Investments, Ltd., 5.125%, 2/10/2019 | 1,146,661 | |||||
1,000M | Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 6.4%, 7/1/2017 | 1,141,819 | |||||
911M | Roche Holdings, Inc., 6%, 3/1/2019 (a) | 1,083,875 | |||||
8,650,494 | |||||||
Household Products—.1% | |||||||
1,000M | Clorox Co., 3.05%, 9/15/2022 | 955,100 | |||||
Information Technology—.8% | |||||||
1,000M | Harris Corp., 4.4%, 12/15/2020 | 1,037,932 | |||||
1,500M | Motorola Solutions, Inc., 6%, 11/15/2017 | 1,712,663 | |||||
1,000M | Pitney Bowes, Inc., 5.75%, 9/15/2017 | 1,103,088 | |||||
1,500M | Symantec Corp., 3.95%, 6/15/2022 | 1,479,044 | |||||
5,332,727 | |||||||
Manufacturing—.9% | |||||||
1,500M | CRH America, Inc., 8.125%, 7/15/2018 | 1,827,766 | |||||
1,000M | Ingersoll-Rand Global Holdings Co., Ltd., 6.875%, 8/15/2018 | 1,186,422 | |||||
1,000M | John Deere Capital Corp., 5.35%, 4/3/2018 | 1,145,122 | |||||
1,000M | Pentair Finance SA, 3.15%, 9/15/2022 | 924,993 | |||||
1,000M | Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.55%, 10/1/2017 | 1,154,095 | |||||
6,238,398 | |||||||
Media-Broadcasting—1.0% | |||||||
1,000M | British Sky Broadcasting Group, PLC, 9.5%, 11/15/2018 (a) | 1,310,874 | |||||
1,500M | CBS Corp., 8.875%, 5/15/2019 | 1,919,722 | |||||
1,500M | Comcast Corp., 5.15%, 3/1/2020 | 1,700,602 | |||||
1,000M | DirecTV Holdings, LLC, 3.8%, 3/15/2022 | 935,004 | |||||
500M | Time Warner Entertainment Co., LP, 8.375%, 3/15/2023 | 584,204 | |||||
6,450,406 |
78 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Media-Diversified—.3% | |||||||
$ 1,000M | McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc., 5.9%, 11/15/2017 | $ 1,082,731 | |||||
1,000M | Vivendi SA, 6.625%, 4/4/2018 (a) | 1,132,052 | |||||
2,214,783 | |||||||
Metals/Mining—1.3% | |||||||
1,500M | Alcoa, Inc., 6.15%, 8/15/2020 | 1,567,018 | |||||
1,500M | ArcelorMittal, 6.125%, 6/1/2018 | 1,595,625 | |||||
1,500M | Newmont Mining Corp., 5.125%, 10/1/2019 | 1,579,788 | |||||
1,500M | Rio Tinto Finance USA, Ltd., 3.75%, 9/20/2021 | 1,481,447 | |||||
1,500M | Vale Overseas, Ltd., 5.625%, 9/15/2019 | 1,636,256 | |||||
1,000M | Xstrata Canada Financial Corp., 4.95%, 11/15/2021 (a) | 1,001,786 | |||||
8,861,920 | |||||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—1.3% | |||||||
1,500M | Boston Properties, LP, 5.875%, 10/15/2019 | 1,729,694 | |||||
1,500M | Digital Realty Trust, LP, 5.25%, 3/15/2021 | 1,579,017 | |||||
HCP, Inc.: | |||||||
500M | 6.7%, 1/30/2018 | 582,776 | |||||
1,000M | 5.375%, 2/1/2021 | 1,089,666 | |||||
1,000M | ProLogis, LP, 6.625%, 5/15/2018 | 1,170,463 | |||||
1,000M | Simon Property Group, LP, 5.75%, 12/1/2015 | 1,094,643 | |||||
1,500M | Ventas Realty, LP, 4.75%, 6/1/2021 | 1,582,137 | |||||
8,828,396 | |||||||
Retail-General Merchandise—.4% | |||||||
1,500M | GAP, Inc., 5.95%, 4/12/2021 | 1,664,555 | |||||
1,000M | Home Depot, Inc., 5.875%, 12/16/2036 | 1,145,252 | |||||
2,809,807 | |||||||
Telecommunications—.5% | |||||||
500M | BellSouth Telecommunications, 6.375%, 6/1/2028 | 546,649 | |||||
1,000M | GTE Corp., 6.84%, 4/15/2018 | 1,167,868 | |||||
1,000M | Rogers Communications, Inc., 3%, 3/15/2023 | 924,752 | |||||
649M | Verizon Communications, Inc., 8.75%, 11/1/2018 | 834,672 | |||||
3,473,941 |
79 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Transportation—.5% | |||||||
$ 1,000M | Burlington North Santa Fe, LLC, 3%, 3/15/2023 | $ 942,891 | |||||
1,000M | Con-way, Inc., 7.25%, 1/15/2018 | 1,134,495 | |||||
1,000M | Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP, 4.875%, 7/11/2022 (a) | 1,020,161 | |||||
3,097,547 | |||||||
Utilities—1.8% | |||||||
925M | Arizona Public Service Co., 8.75%, 3/1/2019 | 1,197,129 | |||||
1,000M | Atmos Energy Corp., 8.5%, 3/15/2019 | 1,288,887 | |||||
1,000M | Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, 7.125%, 12/1/2018 | 1,244,830 | |||||
1,000M | E.ON International Finance BV, 5.8%, 4/30/2018 (a) | 1,162,110 | |||||
1,000M | Electricite de France SA, 6.5%, 1/26/2019 (a) | 1,200,855 | |||||
1,500M | Exelon Generation Co., LLC, 5.2%, 10/1/2019 | 1,644,915 | |||||
357M | Great River Energy Co., 5.829%, 7/1/2017 (a) | 382,313 | |||||
1,000M | National Fuel Gas Co., 8.75%, 5/1/2019 | 1,258,420 | |||||
1,000M | Ohio Power Co., 5.375%, 10/1/2021 | 1,127,373 | |||||
1,000M | Sempra Energy, 9.8%, 2/15/2019 | 1,339,715 | |||||
11,846,547 | |||||||
Waste Management—.2% | |||||||
1,000M | Republic Services, Inc., 3.8%, 5/15/2018 | 1,066,021 | |||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $159,965,342) | 166,101,028 | ||||||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | |||||||
SECURITIES—5.2% | |||||||
Fannie Mae—3.8% | |||||||
9,244M | 3%, 3/1/2027 -10/16/2028 (b) | 9,575,911 | |||||
2,610M | 3.5%, 10/1/2025-8/1/2042 (b) | 2,755,232 | |||||
3,195M | 4%, 12/1/2040 – 10/1/2041 | 3,357,048 | |||||
1,809M | 5%, 4/1/2040 | 1,986,029 | |||||
4,195M | 5.5%, 5/1/2033 – 10/1/2039 | 4,588,076 | |||||
1,736M | 6%, 5/1/2036 – 8/1/2037 | 1,900,243 | |||||
644M | 6.5%, 11/1/2033 – 6/1/2036 | 715,675 | |||||
683M | 7%, 3/1/2032 – 8/1/2032 | �� | 761,967 | ||||
25,640,181 |
80 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Freddie Mac—.9% | |||||||
$ 955M | 3.5%, 9/1/2032 | $ 1,011,401 | |||||
1,015M | 4%, 11/1/2040 | 1,076,828 | |||||
1,360M | 4.5%, 10/1/2040 | 1,459,841 | |||||
2,247M | 5.5%, 5/1/2038 – 10/1/2039 | 2,455,008 | |||||
273M | 6%, 9/1/2032 – 6/1/2035 | 297,252 | |||||
6,300,330 | |||||||
Government National Mortgage Association II | |||||||
Program—.5% | |||||||
2,904M | 4.5%, 7/20/2041 | 3,134,803 | |||||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $34,121,899) | 35,075,314 | ||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.9% | |||||||
Fannie Mae: | |||||||
3,000M | 0.875%, 10/26/2017 | 2,959,965 | |||||
2,000M | 1.875%, 9/18/2018 | 2,024,010 | |||||
2,000M | 1.625%, 11/27/2018 | 1,994,104 | |||||
1,000M | Federal Farm Credit Bank, 3%, 7/2/2020 | 1,000,241 | |||||
Freddie Mac: | |||||||
1,000M | 5.125%, 10/18/2016 | 1,131,232 | |||||
1,000M | 1.25%, 5/12/2017 | 1,007,711 | |||||
1,500M | 5.125%, 11/17/2017 | 1,733,132 | |||||
1,000M | Tennessee Valley Authority, 4.5%, 4/1/2018 | 1,127,846 | |||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $12,771,479) | 12,978,241 | ||||||
MUNICIPAL BONDS—1.9% | |||||||
1,000M | Connecticut State GO, 5%, 6/1/2022 | 1,186,690 | |||||
Dallas-Fort Worth TX Int’l Arpt. Rev.: | |||||||
1,000M | 5%, 11/1/2038 | 963,960 | |||||
2,500M | 5%, 11/1/2042 | 2,378,625 | |||||
2,680M | Judson TX Independent School Dist., 5%, 2/1/2028 | 2,960,194 | |||||
1,000M | Katy TX Independent School Dist., 5%, 2/15/2028 | 1,130,920 | |||||
1,000M | Minnesota State General Fund Rev., 5%, 3/1/2025 | 1,141,050 | |||||
1,500M | Puerto Rico Electric Power Auth. Rev., 6.75%, 7/1/2036 | 1,236,090 | |||||
1,500M | Tyler TX Independent School Dist., 5%, 2/15/2028 | 1,696,380 | |||||
Total Value of Municipal Bonds (cost $13,133,695) | 12,693,909 | ||||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS—1.8% | |||||||
12,000M | U.S. Treasury Note, 1.375%, 12/31/2018 (cost $12,005,391) | 11,943,744 |
81 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2013
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—3.9% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$14,000M | 0.02%, 10/2/2013 | $ 13,999,992 | |||||
12,000M | 0.02%, 10/11/2013 | 11,999,933 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $25,999,925) | 25,999,925 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.8% | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills: | |||||||
10,000M | 0.016%, 10/17/2013 | 9,999,929 | |||||
2,000M | 0.01%, 11/7/2013 | 1,999,980 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Obligations (cost $11,999,909) | 11,999,909 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $524,974,709) | 100.9 | % | 680,097,656 | ||||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.9 | ) | (5,834,404) | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $674,263,252 |
* | Non-income producing |
(a) | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4). |
(b) | A portion or all of the security purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis |
(see Note 1G). |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
GO | General Obligation |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
82 |
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 403,305,586 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 403,305,586 | ||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 166,101,028 | — | 166,101,028 | ||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 35,075,314 | — | 35,075,314 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 12,978,241 | — | 12,978,241 | ||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 12,693,909 | — | 12,693,909 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Obligations | — | 11,943,744 | — | 11,943,744 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 25,999,925 | — | 25,999,925 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 11,999,909 | — | 11,999,909 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 403,305,586 | $ | 276,792,070 | $ | — | $ | 680,097,656 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks |
and corporate bonds. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 83 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
EQUITY INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Equity Income Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net-asset value basis was 19.1% for Class A shares and 18.2% for Class B shares, including dividends of 13.6 cents per share on Class A shares and 7.7 cents per share on Class B shares. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 7.9% for Advisor Class shares and 8.0% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 7.0 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 4.7 cents per share on Institutional Class shares. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
The Fund’s absolute performance was attributable to positive stock selection in the industrial, consumer discretionary and financials sectors.
In industrials, recent mega storms increased the need for reliable back-up power for both residential and commercial customers. This benefited companies like Generac, the leader in standby generators, which got a boost after Hurricane Sandy as more than a billion searches were logged online by people looking to protect themselves from future power outages. In the past year, the company’s sales grew almost 50%, with earnings growth even higher.
Not only has Generac’s stock appreciated over 110% in the past year, but as shareholders we have received more than $11 per share in special dividends in the last eighteen months. With standby generators becoming a necessity for homeowners, Generac’s outlook remains positive.
Honeywell is one of the fund’s largest positions in industrials and it gives the Fund a way to participate in worldwide growth in emerging markets at a reasonable valuation. Their aerospace segment is seeing renewed growth with increased plane orders coming from emerging market countries. In automotive, governments are setting higher mandates for fuel efficiency and Honeywell’s turbo chargers are helping car manufacturers meet these goals.
In the consumer discretionary sector, the Fund’s position in Delphi Automotive was up over 90%, as the rebound in North American autos coupled with the tremendous growth in cars on the road in China fueled strong revenue and earnings growth. The Fund purchased Delphi shortly after its IPO, and has been rewarded with price appreciation and dividend growth—both key measures that the Fund seeks in an investment.
Newell Rubbermaid has been experiencing a renaissance as CEO Michael Polk turns around core operations at the company. Innovative household product lines such as Sharpie, Graco and Calphalon continue to enjoy strong shelf space and consumer acceptance. With increased sales and margins turning into healthy cash flows, Newell has been able to raise its dividend and steadily increase its share buyback.
GNC Holdings has been riding a consumer wave of healthy living with its vitamin and supplement business, which continues to grow at a double-digit pace. Given its present level of product innovation and overseas growth, GNC should continue to outperform its peers.
In financials, JPMorgan Chase, one of the Fund’s top positions, was up over 30%, handily beating the markets despite recent negative headlines. The banking giant’s global reach and dominant market position have given it the resources to produce strong earnings in a variety of markets.
84 |
On a relative basis the Fund outperformed the benchmark in the technology, industrials, consumer discretionary and materials sectors. In industrials and consumer discretionary, the outperformance can be attributed to the stocks already mentioned above. In technology, the Fund’s investment in TE Connectivity, part of the old Tyco conglomerate, helped to drive relative fund performance. TE Connectivity’s auto business has benefited from the explosive growth of cars in China. Their aerospace segment is seeing more of their products getting incorporated into the new plane models.
In technology, the Fund also benefited from not owning Apple. The stock was down over 26% and made up more than 3% of the S&P 500 Index. The Fund recently purchased Apple as it found a valuation level that we found attractive. The company also raised its dividend and the cash flow they produce should lead to bigger share buybacks in the future. New products have driven sales higher and growth in China should lead to continued strength in earnings.
In materials, the Fund benefited from the strong performance of Rock-Tenn and International Paper, both big players in corrugated packaging. The industry has been consolidating over the past few years, and pricing has become better as inventory management has improved industrywide. Earnings and cash flow have improved significantly for both companies and shareholders have been rewarded with bigger dividends and share buybacks.
The Fund performed in line with its benchmark this year as dividend-paying stocks were more in favor. In the early part of 2013, the yield on the 10-year Treasury reached record lows and investors began to embrace stocks that paid higher dividends and offered more bond-like characteristics, such as stability with yield.
Performance also benefited from the Fund’s ability to leverage its multi-cap mandate. The great thing about dividend-paying stocks is that any size company can pay a dividend. The Fund’s small-cap stocks helped to drive performance this year with our small-cap picks up over 34% compared to the S&P 500 Index’s small-caps that were up over 25%. The Funds mid-cap stocks were up over 32% compared to the S&P 500 Index’s mid-caps at 21%.
As we look forward, dividend-paying stocks should be a focus for any investor. Dividend-paying stocks tend to outperform non-dividend-paying stocks when interest rates are either rising or falling. If we look at stock returns since the 1970’s, dividend-paying stocks have outperformed the S&P 500 Index. The Fund is focused on finding those stocks that not only provide yield and stability but provide dividend growth and appreciation.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
85 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.25% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,072.40 | $ 6.49 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.80 | $ 6.33 | |
Class B Shares | 2.09% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,068.66 | $10.84 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.59 | $10.56 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.01% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,078.73 | $ 5.26 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.01 | $ 5.11 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.86% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,079.46 | $ 4.48 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.76 | $ 4.36 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total market value of investments.
86 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Equity Income Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 19.14% | 18.21% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 7.92% | 7.15% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 7.58% | 7.30% | 7.87% | 7.95% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 12.26% | 14.21% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 6.64% | 6.84% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 6.96% | 7.30% | 7.87% | 7.95% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Equity Income Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/03 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
87 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Advisor Class were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 4.20%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations).
88 |
Portfolio of Investments
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
COMMON STOCKS—92.6% | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary—12.5% | |||||||
15,000 | BorgWarner, Inc. | $ 1,520,850 | |||||
30,000 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 1,654,800 | |||||
153,000 | Comcast Corporation – Special Shares “A” | 6,635,610 | |||||
175,300 | Dana Holding Corporation | 4,003,852 | |||||
112,500 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 6,572,250 | |||||
14,400 | Genuine Parts Company | 1,164,816 | |||||
90,000 | GNC Holdings, Inc. – Class “A” | 4,916,700 | |||||
60,000 | Hanesbrands, Inc. | 3,738,600 | |||||
50,000 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 3,311,500 | |||||
42,200 | Home Depot, Inc. | 3,200,870 | |||||
49,500 | Lowe’s Companies, Inc. | 2,356,695 | |||||
23,600 | McDonald’s Corporation | 2,270,556 | |||||
112,400 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 3,091,000 | |||||
124,500 | * | Orient-Express Hotels, Ltd. – Class “A” | 1,616,010 | ||||
156,900 | Regal Entertainment Group – Class “A” | 2,977,962 | |||||
70,000 | Staples, Inc. | 1,025,500 | |||||
79,633 | Time Warner, Inc. | 5,240,648 | |||||
15,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 1,295,550 | |||||
61,900 | Walt Disney Company | 3,991,931 | |||||
60,585,700 | |||||||
Consumer Staples—10.1% | |||||||
230,000 | Altria Group, Inc. | 7,900,500 | |||||
104,300 | Avon Products, Inc. | 2,148,580 | |||||
38,800 | Beam, Inc. | 2,508,420 | |||||
64,200 | Coca-Cola Company | 2,431,896 | |||||
57,500 | ConAgra Foods, Inc. | 1,744,550 | |||||
91,700 | CVS Caremark Corporation | 5,203,975 | |||||
25,000 | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. | 1,120,500 | |||||
12,300 | Herbalife, Ltd. | 858,171 | |||||
28,300 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 2,666,426 | |||||
68,066 | Kraft Foods Group, Inc. | 3,569,381 | |||||
21,300 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,039,262 | |||||
38,500 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 3,060,750 | |||||
54,800 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 4,745,132 | |||||
89,700 | * | Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. | 2,701,764 | ||||
55,400 | Procter & Gamble Company | 4,187,686 | |||||
29,400 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 2,174,424 | |||||
49,061,417 |
89 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Energy—9.9% | |||||||
25,500 | Alerian MLP (ETF) | $ 448,545 | |||||
74,400 | Chevron Corporation | 9,039,600 | |||||
66,500 | ConocoPhillips | 4,622,415 | |||||
59,600 | Devon Energy Corporation | 3,442,496 | |||||
55,000 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 2,956,250 | |||||
57,400 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 4,938,696 | |||||
99,600 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 3,474,048 | |||||
28,000 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 1,800,960 | |||||
30,000 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 2,343,300 | |||||
75,000 | Noble Corporation | 2,832,750 | |||||
64,500 | Occidental Petroleum Corporation | 6,033,330 | |||||
40,500 | Royal Dutch Shell, PLC – Class “A” (ADR) | 2,660,040 | |||||
76,000 | Seadrill, Ltd. | 3,426,080 | |||||
48,018,510 | |||||||
Financials—15.8% | |||||||
52,600 | ACE, Ltd. | 4,921,256 | |||||
25,000 | American Express Company | 1,888,000 | |||||
21,300 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 1,940,004 | |||||
122,200 | Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (REIT) | 1,211,002 | |||||
123,000 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 3,088,530 | |||||
23,556 | Chubb Corporation | 2,102,608 | |||||
85,000 | Discover Financial Services | 4,295,900 | |||||
175,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 3,486,000 | |||||
135,600 | FirstMerit Corporation | 2,943,876 | |||||
39,600 | Invesco, Ltd. | 1,263,240 | |||||
30,000 | iShares S&P U.S. Preferred Stock Index Fund (ETF) | 1,140,000 | |||||
167,800 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 8,673,582 | |||||
33,900 | M&T Bank Corporation | 3,794,088 | |||||
50,000 | MetLife, Inc. | 2,347,500 | |||||
93,700 | Oritani Financial Corporation | 1,542,302 | |||||
62,900 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 4,557,105 | |||||
71,500 | Protective Life Corporation | 3,042,325 | |||||
215,600 | Provident New York Bancorp | 2,347,884 | |||||
7,000 | * | Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REIT) | 94,570 | ||||
139,300 | Select Income REIT (REIT) | 3,593,940 | |||||
42,800 | Travelers Companies, Inc. | 3,628,156 | |||||
83,300 | U.S. Bancorp | 3,047,114 | |||||
98,500 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc.- Class “A” (REIT) | 1,958,180 |
90 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Financials (continued) | |||||||
213,500 | Wells Fargo & Company | $ 8,821,820 | |||||
130,500 | Westfield Financial, Inc. | 921,330 | |||||
76,650,312 | |||||||
Health Care—12.3% | |||||||
43,600 | Abbott Laboratories | 1,447,084 | |||||
86,100 | AbbVie, Inc. | 3,851,253 | |||||
34,600 | Baxter International, Inc. | 2,272,874 | |||||
55,000 | Covidien, PLC | 3,351,700 | |||||
67,400 | GlaxoSmithKline, PLC (ADR) | 3,381,458 | |||||
123,900 | Johnson & Johnson | 10,740,891 | |||||
190,211 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 9,055,946 | |||||
41,500 | Novartis AG (ADR) | 3,183,465 | |||||
45,000 | Omnicare, Inc. | 2,497,500 | |||||
359,224 | Pfizer, Inc. | 10,313,321 | |||||
40,500 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 3,732,075 | |||||
201,500 | Warner Chilcott, PLC – Class “A” | 4,604,275 | |||||
41,952 | Zoetis, Inc. | 1,305,546 | |||||
59,737,388 | |||||||
Industrials—11.5% | |||||||
38,600 | 3M Company | 4,609,226 | |||||
34,537 | * | ADT Corporation | 1,404,274 | ||||
48,000 | Altra Holdings, Inc. | 1,291,680 | |||||
30,000 | Chicago Bridge & Iron Company NV – NY Shares | 2,033,100 | |||||
29,600 | Dover Corporation | 2,658,968 | |||||
30,000 | Eaton Corporation, PLC | 2,065,200 | |||||
12,300 | * | Esterline Technologies Corporation | 982,647 | ||||
52,000 | G&K Services, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,140,280 | |||||
95,000 | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 4,050,800 | |||||
17,800 | General Dynamics Corporation | 1,557,856 | |||||
371,800 | General Electric Company | 8,882,302 | |||||
71,900 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 5,970,576 | |||||
51,450 | ITT Corporation | 1,849,627 | |||||
31,372 | Pentair, Ltd. | 2,037,298 | |||||
20,000 | Snap-on, Inc. | 1,990,000 | |||||
23,800 | * | TAL International Group, Inc. | 1,112,174 | ||||
89,075 | Tyco International, Ltd. | 3,115,844 |
91 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Industrials (continued) | |||||||
24,200 | United Parcel Service, Inc. – Class “B” | $ 2,211,154 | |||||
47,500 | United Technologies Corporation | 5,121,450 | |||||
56,084,456 | |||||||
Information Technology—9.3% | |||||||
7,000 | Apple, Inc. | 3,337,250 | |||||
21,600 | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 1,563,408 | |||||
307,000 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 7,189,940 | |||||
309,700 | Intel Corporation | 7,098,324 | |||||
81,700 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 917,491 | |||||
28,700 | Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. | 855,260 | |||||
134,100 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 3,133,917 | |||||
100,000 | Microchip Technology, Inc. | 4,029,000 | |||||
250,000 | Microsoft Corporation | 8,327,500 | |||||
39,800 | Molex, Inc. | 1,533,096 | |||||
50,000 | Oracle Corporation | 1,658,500 | |||||
55,300 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 3,725,008 | |||||
39,200 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 2,029,776 | |||||
45,398,470 | |||||||
Materials—4.3% | |||||||
18,300 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 1,488,888 | |||||
66,900 | Dow Chemical Company | 2,568,960 | |||||
50,100 | DuPont (E.I.) de Nemours & Company | 2,933,856 | |||||
56,200 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 1,859,096 | |||||
75,400 | International Paper Company | 3,377,920 | |||||
51,700 | LyondellBasell Industries NV – Class “A” | 3,785,991 | |||||
38,000 | Rock-Tenn Company – Class “A” | 3,848,260 | |||||
29,100 | Sonoco Products Company | 1,133,154 | |||||
20,996,125 | |||||||
Telecommunication Services—3.2% | |||||||
203,230 | AT&T, Inc. | 6,873,239 | |||||
111,500 | NTELOS Holdings Corporation | 2,096,200 | |||||
145,500 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 6,789,030 | |||||
15,758,469 |
92 |
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Utilities—3.7% | |||||||
89,500 | American Electric Power Company, Inc. | $ 3,879,825 | |||||
35,100 | NextEra Energy, Inc. | 2,813,616 | |||||
90,900 | NiSource, Inc. | 2,807,901 | |||||
59,000 | Portland General Electric Company | 1,665,570 | |||||
110,000 | PPL Corporation | 3,341,800 | |||||
106,400 | Vectren Corporation | 3,548,440 | |||||
18,057,152 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $333,993,951) | 450,347,999 | ||||||
PREFERRED STOCKS—.4% | |||||||
Financials | |||||||
50,500 | Digital Realty Trust, Inc., Series G, 5.875%, 2049 | 997,375 | |||||
46,000 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc., Series F, 7.125%, 2049 | 1,101,240 | |||||
Total Value of Preferred Stocks (cost $2,403,576) | 2,098,615 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—5.1% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$23,000M | 0.02%, 10/2/2013 | 22,999,987 | |||||
2,000M | 0.02%, 10/11/2013 | 1,999,989 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $24,999,976) | 24,999,976 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.9% | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills: | |||||||
8,000M | 0.016%, 10/17/2013 | 7,999,943 | |||||
1,000M | 0.01%, 11/7/2013 | 999,990 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Obligations (cost $8,999,933) | 8,999,933 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $370,397,436) | 100.0 | % | 486,446,523 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | — | 30,199 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $486,476,722 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ADR | American Depositary Receipts |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
93 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
EQUITY INCOME FUND
September 30, 2013
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 450,347,999 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 450,347,999 | ||||
Preferred Stocks | 2,098,615 | — | — | 2,098,615 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 24,999,976 | 24,999,976 | |||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 8,999,933 | — | 8,999,933 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 452,446,614 | $ | 33,999,909 | $ | — | $ | 486,446,523 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks |
and preferred stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
94 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Growth & Income Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 24.9% for Class A shares and 24.0% for Class B shares, including dividends of 22.4 cents per share on Class A shares and 11.1 cents per share on Class B shares. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 11.5% for Advisor Class shares and 11.6% for Institutional Class shares, including dividends of 8.0 cents per share on Advisor Class shares and 9.0 cents per share on Institutional Class shares. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
During the period under review, strong equity performance and a market rally were driven by a combination of slow but gradually improving economic conditions, accommodative monetary policy from the Federal Reserve (“the Fed”), low volatility and improving corporate fundamentals.
Investor sentiment also improved, with stocks benefitting from a positive re-rating of market-valuation metrics toward more normalized historical levels, which erased the bearish views toward stocks that prevailed after the 2008–2009 market correction.
Despite numerous challenges throughout the year—including worries over whether or not the Fed would “taper” its bond buying stimulus of the economy; disagreements between President Obama and the U.S. Congress on government budget and spending matters; and geopolitical conflicts around the globe—equity markets remained resilient and investors’ restored confidence barely wavered.
This year’s market results were broadly positive overall, with all market sectors, styles and sizes participating. Companies with strong profitability, earnings growth, solid balance sheets and strong, free cash-flows led results. Small and mid-cap stocks flourished, as investors felt comfortable adding more risk to their portfolios. Companies with the ability to pay and raise dividends and execute share repurchases of their own stocks were also rewarded. Mergers and acquisitions also continued to drive strong performance.
These conditions produced a solid year for the Fund, which continue d to invest across all market capitalization segments, allocating 68% of its holdings to large-cap, 17% to mid-cap and 15% to small-cap stocks (ranges defined by Lipper) as of September 30, 2013.
All segments produced positive returns, with the large-cap segment slightly exceeding the benchmark and small- and mid-cap segments outperforming strongly. Results were also buoyed by the Fund’s stock selection within consumer discretionary, industrials, healthcare and consumer staples stocks—all sectors in which the Fund was overweighted relative to the benchmark.
The Fund’s top consumer discretionary performers all generated strong earnings: CBS Corporation — up 53% — enjoyed strong broadcast ratings that produced higher earnings. CBS opened new revenue streams by reselling its programming to internet services and leveraging its content via increased syndication and international distribution deals.
Auto-components supplier Delphi Automotive was up 90%, thanks to higher global automotive sales and an ever-expanding supply of digital content delivered through the center console.
95 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Best Buy Co.—the leading consumer electronics retailer—also stood out, gaining 125% due to improved sales practices, a more competitive stance toward internet retailers, and cuts in unnecessary costs, among other changes.
Within industrials, several investments benefited the Fund’s performance. Longtime holdings TAL International and Textainer Group Holdings—both of which lease freight containers—benefited from increased global trade, solid utilization, and a continued tight global supply of shipping containers. The stocks returned 45% and 30%, respectively.
In the home and industrials sector, standby generator maker Generac Holdings soared 108%, thanks to an improved housing market and market share gains which helped grow earnings to record levels. Generac also paid out a $5 per share special dividend during the year.
Longtime holdings of industrial-conglomerates Honeywell, United Technologies, 3M Co., ITT Corp and Pentair also contributed strongly to the Fund’s results.
In healthcare, three names stood out: Shares of Gilead Sciences were up 90%, with strong performance by its HIV-drug portfolio and blockbuster potential exhibited by its new hepatitis drug. Shares of Thermo Fisher—a leading maker of diagnostic life sciences products—rallied 58% on its pending merger with competitor Life Technologies. Global generic and branded pharmaceutical maker Activis rose 69% on its takeover of Warner Chilcott (up 73%), which is also held within the fund with synergies and cost savings foretelling significantly enhanced future earnings.
Occupying the Fund’s top spot for performance was its long-term holding in the consumer staples sector. Direct seller Nu Skin Enterprises was up 149% for the period. Nu Skin was the Fund’s most significant contributor to Fund returns. Global sales of its Age-Loc skincare products continued to soar and the roll-out of a new weight management product was received with great anticipation, propelling the firm to record sales and profits.
On a relative basis, the Fund performed well, outperforming its benchmark. It did underperform the S&P 500 Index within the financials sector, where the Fund remains underweight. With seemingly no end to quantitative easing and increased costs from greater regulation now looking permanent, financial-sector profits and growth prospects remain anemic, impacting the ability of these companies to raise dividends and repurchase stock.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
96 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.17% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,106.45 | $ 6.18 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.20 | $ 5.92 | |
Class B Shares | 1.95% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,102.46 | $10.28 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,015.29 | $ 9.85 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.97% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,115.34 | $ 5.14 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.21 | $ 4.91 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.78% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,116.44 | $ 4.14 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,021.16 | $ 3.95 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total market value of investments.
97 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Growth & Income Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 24.86% | 24.02% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 10.82% | 10.05% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 7.94% | 7.69% | 11.53% | 11.64% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 17.66% | 20.02% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 9.52% | 9.78% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 7.30% | 7.69% | 11.53% | 11.64% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Growth & Income Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/03 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
98 |
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Advisor Class and Institutional Class were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 7.90%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 8.23%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
** The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations).
99 |
Portfolio of Investments
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
COMMON STOCKS—98.7% | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary—16.5% | |||||||
410,000 | Best Buy Company, Inc. | $ 15,375,000 | |||||
125,000 | BorgWarner, Inc. | 12,673,750 | |||||
430,000 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 23,718,800 | |||||
820,000 | Dana Holding Corporation | 18,728,800 | |||||
305,000 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 17,818,100 | |||||
380,000 | GNC Holdings, Inc. – Class “A” | 20,759,400 | |||||
150,000 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 9,934,500 | |||||
180,000 | Home Depot, Inc. | 13,653,000 | |||||
250,000 | * | Jarden Corporation | 12,100,000 | ||||
315,000 | L Brands, Inc. | 19,246,500 | |||||
106,900 | Lear Corporation | 7,650,833 | |||||
114,100 | McDonald’s Corporation | 10,977,561 | |||||
325,000 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 8,937,500 | |||||
307,900 | * | Orient-Express Hotels, Ltd. – Class “A” | 3,996,542 | ||||
439,700 | Pier 1 Imports, Inc. | 8,582,944 | |||||
307,100 | * | Select Comfort Corporation | 7,477,885 | ||||
125,000 | * | Steiner Leisure, Ltd. | 7,303,750 | ||||
125,000 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 8,913,750 | ||||
85,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 7,341,450 | |||||
160,000 | Walt Disney Company | 10,318,400 | |||||
210,000 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 12,803,700 | |||||
258,312,165 | |||||||
Consumer Staples—9.7% | |||||||
420,000 | Altria Group, Inc. | 14,427,000 | |||||
335,500 | * | Amira Nature Foods, Ltd. | 4,341,370 | ||||
450,000 | Avon Products, Inc. | 9,270,000 | |||||
432,600 | Coca-Cola Company | 16,386,888 | |||||
285,000 | CVS Caremark Corporation | 16,173,750 | |||||
125,000 | Herbalife, Ltd. | 8,721,250 | |||||
275,000 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 26,328,500 | |||||
126,000 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 10,017,000 | |||||
275,000 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 23,812,250 | |||||
135,562 | Procter & Gamble Company | 10,247,131 | |||||
160,000 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 11,833,600 | |||||
151,558,739 |
100 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Energy—10.0% | |||||||
138,000 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | $ 12,832,620 | |||||
144,800 | Chevron Corporation | 17,593,200 | |||||
230,000 | ConocoPhillips | 15,987,300 | |||||
100,000 | Devon Energy Corporation | 5,776,000 | |||||
215,000 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 11,556,250 | |||||
240,490 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 20,691,760 | |||||
31,700 | Hess Corporation | 2,451,678 | |||||
6,920 | Hugoton Royalty Trust | 51,692 | |||||
348,019 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 12,138,903 | |||||
142,509 | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 9,166,179 | |||||
142,500 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 11,130,675 | |||||
425,000 | Noble Corporation | 16,052,250 | |||||
115,000 | Phillips 66 | 6,649,300 | |||||
48,300 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 4,267,788 | |||||
302,900 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 10,837,762 | |||||
157,183,357 | |||||||
Financials—9.5% | |||||||
230,000 | American Express Company | 17,369,600 | |||||
140,000 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 12,751,200 | |||||
120,000 | Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (REIT) | 1,189,200 | |||||
275,000 | Discover Financial Services | 13,898,500 | |||||
100,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 1,992,000 | |||||
225,000 | FirstMerit Corporation | 4,884,750 | |||||
187,500 | * | Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,240,625 | ||||
85,000 | Invesco, Ltd. | 2,711,500 | |||||
396,730 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 20,506,974 | |||||
125,000 | M&T Bank Corporation | 13,990,000 | |||||
100,000 | MetLife, Inc. | 4,695,000 | |||||
100,000 | Morgan Stanley | 2,695,000 | |||||
165,000 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 11,954,250 | |||||
100,000 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 3,565,000 | |||||
357,666 | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 4,556,665 | |||||
355,000 | U.S. Bancorp | 12,985,900 | |||||
350,000 | Urstadt Biddle Properties, Inc. – Class “A” (REIT) | 6,958,000 | |||||
237,050 | Wells Fargo & Company | 9,794,906 | |||||
148,739,070 |
101 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Health Care—12.5% | |||||||
341,600 | Abbott Laboratories | $ 11,337,704 | |||||
230,000 | AbbVie, Inc. | 10,287,900 | |||||
105,000 | * | Actavis, Inc. | 15,120,000 | ||||
100,000 | Baxter International, Inc. | 6,569,000 | |||||
75,000 | Covidien, PLC | 4,570,500 | |||||
200,000 | * | Express Scripts Holding Company | 12,356,000 | ||||
390,000 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 24,507,600 | ||||
270,625 | Johnson & Johnson | 23,460,481 | |||||
9,375 | * | Mallinckrodt, PLC | 413,344 | ||||
60,000 | McKesson Corporation | 7,698,000 | |||||
303,300 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 14,440,113 | |||||
140,000 | Omnicare, Inc. | 7,770,000 | |||||
829,301 | Pfizer, Inc. | 23,809,232 | |||||
260,000 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 23,959,000 | |||||
265,900 | Warner Chilcott, PLC – Class “A” | 6,075,815 | |||||
103,905 | Zoetis, Inc. | 3,233,524 | |||||
195,608,213 | |||||||
Industrials—13.9% | |||||||
185,000 | 3M Company | 22,090,850 | |||||
80,000 | * | ADT Corporation | 3,252,800 | ||||
250,000 | Altra Holdings, Inc. | 6,727,500 | |||||
129,400 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 7,111,824 | ||||
107,000 | Caterpillar, Inc. | 8,920,590 | |||||
150,000 | Chicago Bridge & Iron Company NV – NY Shares | 10,165,500 | |||||
150,000 | Dover Corporation | 13,474,500 | |||||
45,000 | * | Esterline Technologies Corporation | 3,595,050 | ||||
370,000 | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 15,776,800 | |||||
385,000 | General Electric Company | 9,197,650 | |||||
209,700 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 17,413,488 | |||||
120,000 | ITT Corporation | 4,314,000 | |||||
30,000 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 3,826,500 | |||||
227,072 | Pentair, Ltd. | 14,746,055 | |||||
35,000 | Raytheon Company | 2,697,450 | |||||
145,000 | Ryder System, Inc. | 8,656,500 | |||||
100,000 | Snap-on, Inc. | 9,950,000 | |||||
294,300 | * | TAL International Group, Inc. | 13,752,639 | ||||
130,500 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 4,942,035 | |||||
95,000 | Triumph Group, Inc. | 6,670,900 |
102 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Industrials (continued) | |||||||
372,475 | Tyco International, Ltd. | $ 13,029,175 | |||||
154,700 | United Technologies Corporation | 16,679,754 | |||||
216,991,560 | |||||||
Information Technology—17.7% | |||||||
50,000 | Apple, Inc. | 23,837,500 | |||||
350,000 | * | ARRIS Group, Inc. | 5,971,000 | ||||
180,000 | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 7,761,600 | |||||
160,000 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 3,844,800 | ||||
189,000 | * | CDW Corporation | 4,314,870 | ||||
875,000 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 20,492,500 | |||||
100,000 | * | eBay, Inc. | 5,579,000 | ||||
700,000 | EMC Corporation | 17,892,000 | |||||
418,500 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 8,780,130 | |||||
583,775 | Intel Corporation | 13,380,123 | |||||
151,425 | International Business Machines Corporation | 28,040,881 | |||||
425,000 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 4,772,750 | |||||
590,000 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 13,788,300 | |||||
876,345 | Microsoft Corporation | 29,191,052 | |||||
287,400 | * | NeuStar, Inc. – Class “A” | 14,220,552 | ||||
350,000 | Oracle Corporation | 11,609,500 | |||||
150,000 | * | PTC, Inc. | 4,264,500 | ||||
310,000 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 20,881,600 | |||||
455,200 | Symantec Corporation | 11,266,200 | |||||
375,000 | * | Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 6,810,000 | ||||
225,000 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | 11,650,500 | |||||
250,000 | * | Yahoo!, Inc. | 8,290,000 | ||||
276,639,358 | |||||||
Materials—6.7% | |||||||
156,900 | Celanese Corporation – Series “A” | 8,282,751 | |||||
160,000 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 13,017,600 | |||||
160,000 | Eastman Chemical Company | 12,464,000 | |||||
375,000 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 12,405,000 | |||||
355,000 | International Paper Company | 15,904,000 | |||||
220,000 | LyondellBasell Industries NV – Class “A” | 16,110,600 | |||||
40,000 | Praxair, Inc. | 4,808,400 | |||||
170,000 | Rock-Tenn Company – Class “A” | 17,215,900 | |||||
135,000 | RPM International, Inc. | 4,887,000 | |||||
105,095,251 |
103 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Telecommunication Services—2.1% | |||||||
435,300 | AT&T, Inc. | $ 14,721,846 | |||||
396,400 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 18,496,024 | |||||
33,217,870 | |||||||
Utilities—.1% | |||||||
50,000 | Atmos Energy Corporation | 2,129,500 | |||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $995,808,461) | 1,545,475,083 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—.8% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$ 4,000M | 0.02%, 10/2/2013 | 3,999,998 | |||||
9,500M | 0.02%, 10/11/2013 | 9,499,947 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $13,499,945) | 13,499,945 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—.7% | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills: | |||||||
10,000M | 0.016%, 10/17/2013 | 9,999,929 | |||||
1,000M | 0.01%, 11/7/2013 | 999,990 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Obligations (cost $10,999,919) | 10,999,919 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $1,020,308,325) | 100.2 | % | 1,569,974,947 | ||||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.2 | ) | (3,629,205) | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $1,566,345,742 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
104 |
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observ- | |
able for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include | ||
quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar | ||
instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates | ||
and similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 1,545,475,083 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,545,475,083 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 13,499,945 | — | 13,499,945 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 10,999,919 | — | 10,999,919 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 1,545,475,083 | $ | 24,499,864 | $ | — | $ | 1,569,974,947 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 105 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
GLOBAL FUND
Dear Investor:
We are pleased to send you the First Investors Global Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 18.6% for Class A shares and 17.6% for Class B shares, including dividends of 3.5 cents per share on Class A shares and 2.5 cents on Class B shares. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 10.0% for Advisor Class shares and 10.2% for Institutional shares Class and no dividends were declared on the Advisor Class and Institutional Class during the period. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
Global equities rose during the period, thanks to stronger liquidity unleashed by aggressive monetary policy from central banks worldwide, which produced renewed enthusiasm for stocks.
The broad-based global rally was aided by encouraging data in China; further evidence of a European economic recovery; and solid corporate earnings. Additionally, a more accommodating stance by the European Central Bank (ECB) and the U.S. Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) increased investors’ risk appetites. In particular, the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC) surprising “no taper” decision helped ease near-term concerns that rapidly rising interest rates would derail the rally.
While geopolitical fears over Syria dissipated somewhat in September, investors quickly shifted their worries to political paralysis in the U.S. Congress. The possibility of an imminent government shutdown and an even more contentious debt ceiling battle in October ended the period on a sour note.
Within the MSCI All Country World Index, all ten sectors posted positive returns. Consumer discretionary (34.5%), industrials (26.7%) and healthcare (26.5%) led the index, while the materials (0.9%), energy (6.4%), and utilities (8.6%) sectors posted more modest gains. On a regional basis, Japan (31.6%) and Europe ex UK (29.3%) outperformed, while Emerging Markets (1.3%) lagged.
The Fund’s relative outperformance was primarily due to strong security selection in the financials, consumer discretionary and consumer staples sectors, which more than offset weaker stock selection in energy, health care and information technology.
Sector allocation — a result of our bottom-up stock selection process — also contributed positively to relative returns, thanks mainly to a below-benchmark allocation in the weaker performing materials and energy sectors.
Top contributors to relative performance included Green Mountain Coffee, a leading provider of single-cup brewers and k-cups for coffee and other beverages; AXA, a
106 |
France-based global insurance and investment management company; and Lowe’s, a home improvement retailer. Roche Holding, a Swiss pharmaceutical and diagnostics firm, was among the top contributors to absolute returns during the period.
The largest detractors to relative performance included Barrick Gold, a Canada-based gold exploration and mining company; SABESP, a water utility firm based in Brazil; and BG Group, a UK-based natural gas-focused oil and gas exploration company. Personal electronics device maker Apple was among the largest detractors from absolute returns.
At the end of the period, the Fund’s largest overweight allocations were to the health care, industrials, and consumer discretionary sectors, while the Fund remained underweight in materials, telecommunication services and energy relative to the benchmark. The Fund did not utilize derivatives during the period.
On a regional basis, relative returns were aided by underweighting in the weaker performing emerging markets and overweighting in Europe ex UK. Security selection within the UK and Japan, as well as a small cash position in an upward trending market, detracted modestly from relative performance during the period.
Further, the portfolio moved to exceed benchmark exposure in Japan, where we believe the three forces of monetary, fiscal and corporate policy all worked together more effectively — and for the first time — companies became more shareholder-friendly.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
* | Matthew E. Megargel is part of a team of portfolio managers who have managed the U.S. |
portion of the Fund since 2000. |
107 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GLOBAL FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.54% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,094.26 | $ 8.08 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,017.35 | $ 7.79 | |
Class B Shares | 2.36% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,088.89 | $12.36 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,013.24 | $11.91 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.27% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,100.28 | $ 6.69 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.70 | $ 6.43 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 1.14% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,101.65 | $ 6.01 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.35 | $ 5.77 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total market value of investments.
108 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GLOBAL FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Global Fund (Class A shares) and the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) All Country World Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 18.56% | 17.55% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 7.24% | 6.44% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 7.26% | 6.97% | 10.03% | 10.17% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 11.81% | 13.55% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 5.98% | 6.13% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 6.63% | 6.97% | 10.03% | 10.17% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Global Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/03 with a theoretical investment in the MSCI All Country World Index (the “Index”). The Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization weighted index designed to measure the equity market performance of developed and emerging market country indices. The Index consists of 45 country indices including 24 developed and 21 emerging market country indices. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
109 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 11.78%, 5.96% and 6.62%, respectively. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 13.53%, 6.10% and 6.99%, respectively. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 6.24%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 6.54%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
** The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations).
110 |
Portfolio of Investments
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
COMMON STOCKS—97.1% | |||||||
United States—48.4% | |||||||
6,000 | Accenture, PLC – Class “A” | $ 441,840 | |||||
13,900 | Aetna, Inc. | 889,878 | |||||
36,600 | Aflac, Inc. | 2,268,834 | |||||
34,395 | AGCO Corporation | 2,078,146 | |||||
89,050 | Altria Group, Inc. | 3,058,868 | |||||
24,280 | American International Group, Inc. | 1,180,736 | |||||
18,515 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 1,686,346 | |||||
41,050 | Amgen, Inc. | 4,595,137 | |||||
29,520 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | 2,745,065 | |||||
8,065 | Apple, Inc. | 3,844,989 | |||||
37,000 | Assured Guaranty, Ltd. | 693,750 | |||||
44,000 | AT&T, Inc. | 1,488,080 | |||||
4,620 | * | AutoZone, Inc. | 1,953,013 | ||||
11,100 | * | B/E Aerospace, Inc. | 819,402 | ||||
10,300 | * | Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. | 796,808 | ||||
13,100 | Belden, Inc. | 839,055 | |||||
3,500 | * | Biogen IDEC, Inc. | 842,660 | ||||
10,755 | BlackRock, Inc. | 2,910,518 | |||||
9,200 | * | Cameron International Corporation | 537,004 | ||||
34,455 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 1,900,538 | |||||
21,685 | * | Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd. | 1,226,504 | ||||
42,195 | Chevron Corporation | 5,126,692 | |||||
25,090 | Chicago Bridge & Iron Company NV – NY Shares | 1,700,349 | |||||
18,665 | Cigna Corporation | 1,434,592 | |||||
139,880 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3,275,990 | |||||
99,815 | Citigroup, Inc. | 4,842,026 | |||||
10,600 | * | Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation – Class “A” | 870,472 | ||||
44,945 | Covidien, PLC | 2,738,948 | |||||
39,745 | CVS Caremark Corporation | 2,255,529 | |||||
89,100 | D.R. Horton, Inc. | 1,731,213 | |||||
12,000 | Deere & Company | 976,680 | |||||
45,695 | * | Dollar Tree, Inc. | 2,611,926 | ||||
34,690 | Eaton Corporation, PLC | 2,388,060 | |||||
47,475 | * | eBay, Inc. | 2,648,630 | ||||
19,670 | Eli Lilly & Company | 989,991 | |||||
131,680 | EMC Corporation | 3,365,741 | |||||
58,420 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 3,140,075 | |||||
11,400 | * | Express Scripts Holding Company | 704,292 | ||||
24,400 | FedEx Corporation | 2,784,284 | |||||
21,400 | Flowserve Corporation | 1,335,146 | |||||
15,600 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 980,304 |
111 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
United States (continued) | |||||||
4,665 | * | Google, Inc. – Class “A” | $ 4,086,120 | ||||
17,940 | * | Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. | 1,351,420 | ||||
9,200 | Harley-Davidson, Inc. | 591,008 | |||||
31,300 | * | Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. | 693,608 | ||||
32,400 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 679,752 | |||||
11,820 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 981,533 | |||||
16,200 | IAC/InterActiveCorp | 885,654 | |||||
2,400 | International Business Machines Corporation | 444,432 | |||||
209,530 | Interpublic Group of Companies., Inc. | 3,599,725 | |||||
46,080 | * | JDS Uniphase Corporation | 677,837 | ||||
21,840 | Johnson & Johnson | 1,893,310 | |||||
93,380 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 4,826,812 | |||||
29,100 | Las Vegas Sands Corporation | 1,932,822 | |||||
84,250 | Lowe’s Companies, Inc. | 4,011,143 | |||||
18,965 | Mattel, Inc. | 793,875 | |||||
15,365 | McKesson Corporation | 1,971,330 | |||||
64,860 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 3,087,985 | |||||
109,315 | Microsoft Corporation | 3,641,283 | |||||
18,100 | * | Monster Beverage Corporation | 945,725 | ||||
17,920 | NextEra Energy, Inc. | 1,436,467 | |||||
51,935 | Norfolk Southern Corporation | 4,017,172 | |||||
84,900 | Oracle Corporation | 2,816,133 | |||||
103,166 | Pfizer, Inc. | 2,961,896 | |||||
8,900 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 770,651 | |||||
57,075 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 4,135,084 | |||||
34,760 | Procter & Gamble Company | 2,627,508 | |||||
8,510 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 573,234 | |||||
12,300 | Ross Stores, Inc. | 895,440 | |||||
1,200 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 106,032 | |||||
32,375 | St. Jude Medical, Inc. | 1,736,595 | |||||
19,540 | Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. | 1,298,433 | |||||
27,045 | UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 1,936,692 | |||||
17,400 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 895,752 | |||||
46,165 | Walgreen Company | 2,483,677 | |||||
12,830 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 948,907 | |||||
7,900 | Walt Disney Company | 509,471 | |||||
33,000 | Wells Fargo & Company | 1,363,560 | |||||
30,365 | * | WESCO International, Inc. | 2,323,833 | ||||
28,300 | * | Whiting Petroleum Corporation | 1,693,755 | ||||
17,624 | Zoetis, Inc. | 548,459 | |||||
155,872,236 |
112 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Japan—10.9% | |||||||
93,600 | Aeon Company, Ltd. | $ 1,288,699 | |||||
12,370 | Aeon Mall Company, Ltd. | 367,350 | |||||
47,200 | Aisin Seiki Company, Ltd. | 2,013,065 | |||||
89,500 | Asahi Group Holdings, Ltd. | 2,352,311 | |||||
121,000 | Bank of Yokohama, Ltd. | 691,781 | |||||
10,400 | Daito Trust Construction Company, Ltd. | 1,039,735 | |||||
41,000 | Daiwa House Industry Company, Ltd. | 772,158 | |||||
42,800 | Dentsu, Inc. | 1,626,945 | |||||
35,700 | Eisai Company, Ltd. | 1,451,648 | |||||
2,000 | FamilyMart Company, Ltd. | 86,522 | |||||
17,260 | Honda Motor Company, Ltd. | 656,979 | |||||
90,900 | Japan Tobacco, Inc. | 3,270,084 | |||||
170,100 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | 1,785,508 | |||||
529,990 | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 3,386,535 | |||||
36,000 | Mitsui Fudosan Company, Ltd. | 1,208,866 | |||||
224,600 | Nomura Holdings, Inc. | 1,751,022 | |||||
25,000 | Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. | 868,790 | |||||
27,900 | * | Olympus Corporation | 848,160 | ||||
16,600 | Omron Corporation | 599,715 | |||||
19,700 | Ono Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd. | 1,210,609 | |||||
58,300 | ORIX Corporation | 947,653 | |||||
177,100 | Rakuten, Inc. | 2,680,189 | |||||
105,320 | T&D Holdings, Inc. | 1,303,016 | |||||
17,400 | THK Company, Ltd. | 385,504 | |||||
74,900 | Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. | 2,446,415 | |||||
35,039,259 | |||||||
France—8.9% | |||||||
31,353 | Accor SA | 1,304,642 | |||||
25,243 | Air Liquide SA | 3,517,837 | |||||
2,693 | AtoS | 210,449 | |||||
155,046 | AXA SA | 3,594,178 | |||||
39,684 | BNP Paribas SA | 2,685,925 | |||||
19,468 | Bureau Veritas SA | 614,024 | |||||
26,952 | Cap Gemini SA | 1,604,190 | |||||
15,567 | Essilor International SA | 1,675,253 | |||||
70,659 | * | Peugeot SA | 1,162,123 | ||||
96,284 | Rexel SA | 2,450,306 | |||||
24,781 | Safran SA | 1,527,470 | |||||
22,974 | Sanofi | 2,331,484 |
113 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
France (continued) | |||||||
40,686 | Schneider Electric SA | $ 3,442,729 | |||||
13,340 | Technip SA | 1,567,234 | |||||
3,543 | Unibail-Rodamco | 879,587 | |||||
28,567,431 | |||||||
United Kingdom—7.8% | |||||||
41,629 | AstraZeneca, PLC | 2,167,707 | |||||
16,900 | AstraZeneca, PLC (ADR) | 877,617 | |||||
273,254 | BAE Systems, PLC | 2,010,763 | |||||
216,821 | Barclays, PLC | 932,227 | |||||
70,102 | BG Group, PLC | 1,340,147 | |||||
300,916 | BP, PLC | 2,110,520 | |||||
19,340 | BP, PLC (ADR) | 812,860 | |||||
8,188 | Derwent London, PLC | 314,122 | |||||
98,945 | Diageo, PLC | 3,148,563 | |||||
274,012 | Direct Line Insurance Group, PLC | 946,047 | |||||
76,712 | Experian, PLC | 1,462,163 | |||||
35,693 | Great Portland Estates, PLC | 311,550 | |||||
252,281 | Kingfisher, PLC | 1,576,577 | |||||
739,328 | * | Lloyds Banking Group, PLC | 880,953 | ||||
115,116 | National Grid, PLC | 1,361,796 | |||||
180,295 | Rexam, PLC | 1,406,132 | |||||
173,542 | * | Rolls-Royce Holdings, PLC | 3,125,111 | ||||
6,209 | Schroders, PLC | 259,014 | |||||
25,043,869 | |||||||
Switzerland—3.7% | |||||||
13,224 | Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA | 1,324,959 | |||||
75,865 | Julius Baer Group, Ltd. | 3,540,507 | |||||
19,399 | Roche Holding AG – Genusscheine | 5,232,420 | |||||
92,200 | * | UBS AG – Registered | 1,886,315 | ||||
11,984,201 | |||||||
Belgium—3.2% | |||||||
50,702 | Anheuser-Busch InBev NV | 5,050,022 | |||||
40,085 | Anheuser-Busch InBev NV (ADR) | 3,976,432 | |||||
25,395 | Umicore SA | 1,234,446 | |||||
10,260,900 |
114 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Italy—2.8% | |||||||
140,143 | Assicurazioni Generali SpA | $ 2,798,155 | |||||
32,171 | Banca Generali SpA | 727,260 | |||||
668,463 | Intesa Sanpaolo | 1,379,925 | |||||
118,618 | * | Mediaset SpA | 481,704 | ||||
582,412 | Snam Rete Gas SpA | 2,951,716 | |||||
83,505 | UniCredit SpA | 532,631 | |||||
8,871,391 | |||||||
Canada—1.7% | |||||||
37,800 | Barrick Gold Corporation | 703,836 | |||||
20,300 | Canadian National Railway Company | 2,062,191 | |||||
24,000 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 859,928 | |||||
33,990 | Tim Hortons, Inc. | 1,975,117 | |||||
5,601,072 | |||||||
Netherlands—1.1% | |||||||
7,485 | ASML Holding NV – NY Shares (ADR) | 739,219 | |||||
73,955 | * | NXP Semiconductors NV | 2,751,866 | ||||
3,491,085 | |||||||
Hong Kong—1.0% | |||||||
290,200 | AIA Group, Ltd. | 1,363,970 | |||||
63,000 | Link REIT (REIT) | 309,104 | |||||
500,530 | MGM China Holdings, Ltd. | 1,661,947 | |||||
3,335,021 | |||||||
Germany—1.0% | |||||||
5,397 | Brenntag AG | 898,964 | |||||
9,409 | Continental AG | 1,595,890 | |||||
12,866 | Lanxess AG | 835,626 | |||||
3,330,480 | |||||||
China—1.0% | |||||||
30,800 | China Pacific Insurance Group Company, Ltd. | 110,409 | |||||
178,000 | ENN Energy Holdings, Ltd. | 989,252 | |||||
1,768,000 | Lenovo Group, Ltd. | 1,848,898 | |||||
20,000 | Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Group Company, Ltd. | 34,816 | |||||
410,000 | Skyworth Digital Holdings, Ltd. | 195,612 | |||||
3,178,987 |
115 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Taiwan—.9% | |||||||
180,300 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (ADR) | $ 3,057,888 | |||||
Spain—.9% | |||||||
236,253 | * | Banco Popular Espanol SA | 1,269,307 | ||||
97,031 | * | Telefonica SA | 1,511,800 | ||||
2,781,107 | |||||||
Sweden—.8% | |||||||
58,562 | Assa Abloy AB – Class “B” | 2,689,634 | |||||
Ireland—.5% | |||||||
72,229 | CRH, PLC | 1,728,789 | |||||
Austria—.4% | |||||||
37,036 | Erste Group Bank AG | 1,171,130 | |||||
Portugal—.4% | |||||||
70,091 | Galp Energia SGPS SA | 1,166,539 | |||||
Finland—.3% | |||||||
9,940 | Kone Oyj-B | 887,380 | |||||
India—.3% | |||||||
108,856 | ITC, Ltd. | 591,879 | |||||
6,079 | United Spirits, Ltd. | 245,976 | |||||
837,855 | |||||||
Brazil—.2% | |||||||
42,874 | Cia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo (ADR) | 427,025 | |||||
26,200 | Mills Estruturas e Servicos | 358,153 | |||||
785,178 | |||||||
United Arab Emirates—.2% | |||||||
23,100 | * | Al Noor Hospitals Group, PLC | 305,626 | ||||
84,106 | NMC Health, PLC | 445,244 | |||||
750,870 | |||||||
Norway—.2% | |||||||
17,534 | * | Algeta ASA | 676,375 |
116 |
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Panama—.2% | |||||||
4,430 | Copa Holdings SA – Class “A” | $ 614,308 | |||||
Mexico—.2% | |||||||
197,400 | Fibra Uno Administracion SA | 544,195 | |||||
Malaysia—.1% | |||||||
375,100 | Airasia Berhad | 294,602 | |||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $240,603,412) | 312,561,782 | ||||||
PREFERRED STOCKS—1.2% | |||||||
Germany | |||||||
36,913 | * | ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG | 1,568,980 | ||||
9,000 | Volkswagen AG | 2,122,871 | |||||
Total Value of Preferred Stocks (cost $3,424,274) | 3,691,851 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—.5% | |||||||
United States | |||||||
$1,500M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.02%, 10/11/2013 (cost $1,499,992) | 1,499,992 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $245,527,678) | 98.8 | % | 317,753,625 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.2 | 3,997,034 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $321,750,659 |
* | Non income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ADR | American Depositary Receipts |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
117 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2013
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observ- | |
able for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include | ||
quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar | ||
instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates | ||
and similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||
United States | $ | 155,872,236 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 155,872,236 | ||||
Japan | 35,039,259 | — | — | 35,039,259 | ||||||||
France | 28,567,431 | — | — | 28,567,431 | ||||||||
United Kingdom | 25,043,869 | — | — | 25,043,869 | ||||||||
Switzerland | 11,984,201 | — | — | 11,984,201 | ||||||||
Belgium | 10,260,900 | — | — | 10,260,900 | ||||||||
Italy | 8,871,391 | — | — | 8,871,391 | ||||||||
Canada | 5,601,072 | — | — | 5,601,072 | ||||||||
Netherlands | 3,491,085 | — | — | 3,491,085 | ||||||||
Hong Kong | 3,335,021 | — | — | 3,335,021 | ||||||||
Germany | 3,330,480 | — | — | 3,330,480 | ||||||||
China | 3,178,987 | — | — | 3,178,987 | ||||||||
Taiwan | 3,057,888 | — | — | 3,057,888 | ||||||||
Spain | 2,781,107 | — | — | 2,781,107 | ||||||||
Sweden | 2,689,634 | — | — | 2,689,634 | ||||||||
Ireland | 1,728,789 | — | — | 1,728,789 | ||||||||
Austria | 1,171,130 | — | — | 1,171,130 | ||||||||
Portugal | 1,166,539 | — | — | 1,166,539 | ||||||||
Finland | 887,380 | — | — | 887,380 |
118 |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks (continued) | ||||||||||||
India | $ | 837,855 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 837,855 | ||||
Brazil | 785,178 | — | — | 785,178 | ||||||||
United Arab Emirates | 750,870 | — | — | 750,870 | ||||||||
Norway | 676,375 | — | — | 676,375 | ||||||||
Panama | 614,308 | — | — | 614,308 | ||||||||
Mexico | 544,195 | — | — | 544,195 | ||||||||
Malaysia | 294,602 | — | — | 294,602 | ||||||||
Preferred Stocks | ||||||||||||
Germany | 3,691,851 | — | — | 3,691,851 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 1,499,992 | — | 1,499,992 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 316,253,633 | $ | 1,499,992 | $ | — | $ | 317,753,625 |
During the year ended September 30, 2013, there were no transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments that had a material impact to the Fund. This does not include transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments due to the Fund utilizing international fair value pricing during the period. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 119 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
SELECT GROWTH FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Select Growth Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 15.8% for Class A shares and 15.0% for Class B shares. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 9.5% for Advisor Class shares and 9.6% for Institutional Class shares. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
The Fund’s relative performance during the fiscal year was impacted by a market dominated by value drivers, whereby stocks with the lowest price-to-earnings and price-to-book value ratios posted the best returns. In this environment, companies exhibiting unexpected good business fundamentals that resulted in positive earnings revisions and surprisingly positive earnings — and on which the Fund focused — underperformed.
Sector-wise, healthcare and consumer staples delivered most of the Fund’s positive performance during the fiscal year — starting with pharmaceutical company Actavis, which posted strong revenue growth and earnings growth and whose stock price got a lift from speculation that the company was an acquisition target. In May, the company announced its intention to merge with Warner-Chilcott. The stock ultimately gained 69% during the year.
Pharmaceutical distributor Omnicare showed stable revenue growth and strong improvement in cost controls to drive profitability, with shares increasing 65% in value over the year. In consumer staples, grocery company Kroger and wholesale retailer Costco delivered outstanding performance, gaining 75% and 31%, respectively.
On the negative side, the information technology and consumer discretionary sectors were challenging for the Fund over the last 12 months. Despite good returns in Alliance Data Systems and NetApp, and reduced exposure to Apple in early November, negative moves in several holdings generated significant underperformance for the Fund — including SolarWinds and VMware, which were down 35% and 23%, respectively.
Despite several years of very strong performance for the Fund by the consumer discretionary sector, some retailers disappointed during the year. Ross Stores and Bed Bath & Beyond were both down 10% for the fiscal year and Abercrombie & Fitch declined 20% as teen shoppers significantly curtailed back-to-school clothing purchases.
While a strong 15.7% absolute return is disappointing relative to benchmark performance, we are encouraged by the strong business fundamentals most of the portfolio holdings are delivering as well as signs that investors are starting to favor these companies with better stock performance.
120 |
We continue to believe our focus on high-quality companies with strong earnings expectations are the key to generating excess return over the long term.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
121 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.31% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,085.78 | $ 6.85 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.50 | $ 6.63 | |
Class B Shares | 2.11% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 933.17 | $10.23 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.49 | $10.66 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.02% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,094.56 | $ 5.36 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.96 | $ 5.17 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.89% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,095.74 | $ 4.68 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.61 | $ 4.51 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total market value of investments.
122 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Select Growth Fund (Class A shares) and the Russell 3000 Growth Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 15.79% | 15.03% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 6.67% | 5.94% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 5.63% | 5.40% | 9.46% | 9.57% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 9.09% | 11.03% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 5.41% | 5.62% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 5.01% | 5.40% | 9.46% | 9.57% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Select Growth Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/03 with a theoretical investment in the Russell 3000 Growth Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values (the Russell 3000 Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization). It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
123 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Advisor Class and Institutional Class were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Advisor Class the “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 5.85%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 6.14%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Frank Russell and Company and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations).
124 |
Portfolio of Investments
SELECT GROWTH FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
COMMON STOCKS—98.9% | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary—20.7% | |||||||
76,000 | BorgWarner, Inc. | $ 7,705,640 | |||||
306,200 | Gentex Corporation | 7,835,658 | |||||
137,800 | Home Depot, Inc. | 10,452,130 | |||||
11,100 | * | Priceline.com, Inc. | 11,221,545 | ||||
131,000 | Starbucks Corporation | 10,083,070 | |||||
220,800 | TJX Companies, Inc. | 12,450,912 | |||||
45,240 | Whirlpool Corporation | 6,624,946 | |||||
66,373,901 | |||||||
Consumer Staples—7.8% | |||||||
67,000 | Costco Wholesale Corporation | 7,713,040 | |||||
71,800 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 6,764,996 | |||||
260,100 | Kroger Company | 10,492,434 | |||||
24,970,470 | |||||||
Energy—6.1% | |||||||
44,300 | Chevron Corporation | 5,382,450 | |||||
47,700 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 4,104,108 | |||||
72,700 | Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 5,012,665 | |||||
151,300 | Valero Energy Corporation | 5,166,895 | |||||
19,666,118 | |||||||
Financials—8.6% | |||||||
153,000 | American Express Company | 11,554,560 | |||||
128,900 | Discover Financial Services | 6,514,606 | |||||
55,400 | Travelers Companies, Inc. | 4,696,258 | |||||
129,700 | U.S. Bancorp | 4,744,426 | |||||
27,509,850 | |||||||
Health Care—16.5% | |||||||
81,700 | * | Actavis, Inc. | 11,764,800 | ||||
84,600 | Cooper Companies, Inc. | 10,971,774 | |||||
57,500 | Johnson & Johnson | 4,984,675 | |||||
70,600 | McKesson Corporation | 9,057,980 | |||||
111,100 | Omnicare, Inc. | 6,166,050 | |||||
193,500 | ResMed, Inc. | 10,220,670 | |||||
53,165,949 |
125 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Industrials—14.7% | |||||||
108,000 | Alaska Air Group, Inc. | $ 6,762,960 | |||||
202,800 | AMETEK, Inc. | 9,332,856 | |||||
90,000 | Boeing Company | 10,575,000 | |||||
94,400 | Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 10,095,136 | |||||
164,000 | Wabtec Corporation | 10,310,680 | |||||
47,076,632 | |||||||
Information Technology—22.3% | |||||||
54,700 | * | Alliance Data Systems Corporation | 11,567,409 | ||||
163,900 | * | AOL, Inc. | 5,667,662 | ||||
28,100 | Apple, Inc. | 13,396,675 | |||||
190,899 | * | CoreLogic, Inc. | 5,163,818 | ||||
242,100 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 5,079,258 | |||||
248,600 | NetApp, Inc. | 10,595,332 | |||||
85,600 | SanDisk Corporation | 5,094,056 | |||||
112,800 | * | VMware, Inc. – Class “A” | 9,125,520 | ||||
92,619 | Western Digital Corporation | 5,872,044 | |||||
71,561,774 | |||||||
Materials—2.2% | |||||||
70,900 | Rock-Tenn Company – Class “A” | 7,180,043 | |||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $237,861,344) | 317,504,737 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—.9% | |||||||
$3,000M | U.S. Treasury Bill, 0.0005%, 10/10/2013 (cost $3,000,000) | 3,000,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $240,861,344) | 99.8 | % | 320,504,737 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .2 | 638,991 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $321,143,728 |
* | Non-income producing |
126 |
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 317,504,737 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 317,504,737 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 3,000,000 | — | 3,000,000 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 317,504,737 | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | — | $ | 320,504,737 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 and Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
See notes to financial statements | 127 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Dear Investor:
We are pleased to send you the First Investors Opportunity Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 34.5% for Class A shares and 33.5% for Class B shares, including capital gains distributions of 80.1 cents per share for both A shares and B shares, and dividends of 26.0 cents per share on Class A shares and 21.7 cents per share on Class B shares. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 15.2% for Advisor Class shares and 15.3% for Institutional Class shares. No capital gain distributions and dividends were declared on the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
The Fund performed well, posting strong results while also exceeding its benchmark index by a comfortable margin. The Fund’s absolute performance was mainly attributable to investments in industrials and consumer discretionary stocks. Among our industrial stocks, Triumph Group — a maker of aircraft components and engine accessories — benefited from order increases at Boeing Company and EADS NV (the maker of Airbus), as well as a large contract to build fuselage sections for Embraer SA.
Esterline Technologies — a maker of sensor and interface systems for commercial and military aircraft — benefited from trends that also helped Triumph Group. While the commercial aerospace markets have remained strong, the defense aerospace markets performed better than expected after sequestration went into effect on March 1.
Among the Fund’s consumer discretionary stocks, Delphi Automotive PLC — which makes powertrains and electrical architecture for passenger cars — benefited from global demand for better fuel efficiency and more “infotainment” and connectivity systems. GNC Holdings — a U.S. focused specialty retailer of health and wellness products — continued to benefit from the same strong core demand it experienced last year. This year, GNC Holdings also benefited from its new “Gold Card Member Pricing” program, which brought in new customers who had been seeking coupon and refill-related purchases elsewhere.
On a relative basis, the Fund outperformed the S&P 400 Mid-Cap Index primarily due to stock selection in the consumer staples and consumer discretionary sectors. In the consumer staples sector, Nu Skin Enterprises — a direct seller of personal care products and nutritional supplements — reported better-than-expected earnings and strengthened its outlook for both its existing business and a recently launched weight management product line.
128 |
Elsewhere in the consumer staples sector, Prestige Brands Holdings — which sells household cleaners and over-the-counter healthcare products — also consistently beat earnings expectations and generated stronger-than-expected cash flow. Further, OTC products — which it acquired from GlaxoSmithKline in December 2011 — continued to perform well.
In the consumer discretionary sector, Dana Holding Corp. — which makes drive-line products and power technologies for the truck and auto markets — and Delphi Automotive PLC both helped drive outperformance. Dana Holding benefited from a recovering volume in truck production as well as a desire by original equipment manufacturers to focus on fewer large and well-capitalized suppliers.
Among detractors to relative performance, the Fund’s stock selection within the utility sector hurt. While the Fund’s individual stocks did well, electric and natural gas utilities had a very strong year due to the low-interest rate environment and low fuel costs in the first half of the calendar year. The Fund remains underweight in utility stocks, as we believe better earnings growth prospects exist in other sectors. For example, the Fund has been rewarded by our decision to overweight the industrial and consumer discretionary sectors, where we believed the fundamentals indicated stronger core earnings growth.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
129 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.24% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,139.25 | $ 6.65 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.85 | $ 6.28 | |
Class B Shares | 2.01% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,135.06 | $10.76 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.99 | $10.15 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 0.98% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,152.43 | $ 5.29 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.16 | $ 4.96 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.85% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,153.33 | $ 4.59 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.81 | $ 4.31 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total market value of investments.
130 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Opportunity Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 34.47% | 33.49% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 13.21% | 12.41% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 10.19% | 10.03% | 15.24% | 15.33% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 26.75% | 29.49% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 11.88% | 12.16% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 9.54% | 10.03% | 15.24% | 15.33% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Opportunity Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/03 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 400 stocks designed to measure performance of the mid-range sector of the U.S. stock market. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
131 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited) (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for Ten Years would have been 9.52%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Ten Years would have been 9.91%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 11.74%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 12.01%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations).
132 |
Portfolio of Investments
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
COMMON STOCKS—96.5% | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary—18.5% | |||||||
75,000 | BorgWarner, Inc. | $ 7,604,250 | |||||
200,000 | CST Brands, Inc. | 5,960,000 | |||||
540,000 | Dana Holding Corporation | 12,333,600 | |||||
204,600 | * | Del Frisco’s Restaurant Group, Inc. | 4,126,782 | ||||
245,000 | Delphi Automotive, PLC | 14,312,900 | |||||
210,000 | GNC Holdings, Inc. – Class “A” | 11,472,300 | |||||
115,000 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 7,616,450 | |||||
149,500 | * | Jarden Corporation | 7,235,800 | ||||
165,000 | L Brands, Inc. | 10,081,500 | |||||
185,000 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 5,087,500 | |||||
50,000 | Nordstrom, Inc. | 2,810,000 | |||||
436,000 | * | Orient-Express Hotels, Ltd. – Class “A” | 5,659,280 | ||||
6,900 | Oxford Industries, Inc. | 469,062 | |||||
329,800 | Pier 1 Imports, Inc. | 6,437,696 | |||||
25,000 | Ralph Lauren Corporation | 4,118,250 | |||||
205,000 | Ruth’s Hospitality Group, Inc. | 2,431,300 | |||||
149,300 | * | Select Comfort Corporation | 3,635,455 | ||||
175,000 | Stewart Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,299,500 | |||||
145,000 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 10,339,950 | ||||
85,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 7,341,450 | |||||
90,000 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 5,487,300 | |||||
136,860,325 | |||||||
Consumer Staples—7.4% | |||||||
175,400 | * | Amira Nature Foods, Ltd. | 2,269,676 | ||||
240,000 | Avon Products, Inc. | 4,944,000 | |||||
10,000 | * | Fairway Group Holdings Corporation | 255,600 | ||||
70,000 | Herbalife, Ltd. | 4,883,900 | |||||
20,000 | McCormick & Company, Inc. | 1,294,000 | |||||
200,000 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 19,148,000 | |||||
82,600 | Pinnacle Foods, Inc. | 2,186,422 | |||||
538,500 | * | Prestige Brands Holdings, Inc. | 16,219,620 | ||||
69,407 | Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 2,139,123 | |||||
99,700 | * | WhiteWave Foods Company – Class “A” | 1,991,009 | ||||
55,331,350 | |||||||
Energy—7.3% | |||||||
1,000 | * | Athlon Energy, Inc. | 32,700 | ||||
30,000 | * | Dril-Quip, Inc. | 3,442,500 |
133 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Energy (continued) | |||||||
170,000 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | $ 9,137,500 | |||||
40,000 | EOG Resources, Inc. | 6,771,200 | |||||
90,000 | EQT Corporation | 7,984,800 | |||||
43,000 | Hess Corporation | 3,325,620 | |||||
139,700 | National Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 10,911,967 | |||||
205,000 | Noble Corporation | 7,742,850 | |||||
225,000 | Talisman Energy, Inc. | 2,587,500 | |||||
125,000 | * | Weatherford International, Ltd. | 1,916,250 | ||||
53,852,887 | |||||||
Financials—11.5% | |||||||
60,000 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 5,464,800 | |||||
200,000 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 5,022,000 | |||||
105,000 | City National Corporation | 6,999,300 | |||||
220,000 | Discover Financial Services | 11,118,800 | |||||
150,000 | Douglas Emmett, Inc. (REIT) | 3,520,500 | |||||
45,000 | Federal Realty Investment Trust (REIT) | 4,565,250 | |||||
90,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 1,792,800 | |||||
175,000 | FirstMerit Corporation | 3,799,250 | |||||
171,000 | * | Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,043,450 | ||||
15,000 | Invesco, Ltd. | 478,500 | |||||
65,000 | M&T Bank Corporation | 7,274,800 | |||||
120,000 | NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. | 3,850,800 | |||||
100,000 | Oritani Financial Corporation | 1,646,000 | |||||
275,000 | Protective Life Corporation | 11,701,250 | |||||
325,000 | Provident New York Bancorp | 3,539,250 | |||||
22,700 | * | Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REIT) | 306,677 | ||||
92,000 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 3,279,800 | |||||
175,000 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 9,009,000 | |||||
85,412,227 | |||||||
Health Care—11.0% | |||||||
110,000 | * | Actavis, Inc. | 15,840,000 | ||||
125,000 | * | Centene Corporation | 7,995,000 | ||||
75,000 | DENTSPLY International, Inc. | 3,255,750 | |||||
160,000 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 10,054,400 | ||||
87,500 | McKesson Corporation | 11,226,250 | |||||
110,700 | Omnicare, Inc. | 6,143,850 | |||||
20,000 | Perrigo Company | 2,467,600 |
134 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Health Care (continued) | |||||||
125,000 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | $ 11,518,750 | |||||
235,000 | * | Triple-S Management Corporation – Class “B” | 4,321,650 | ||||
375,000 | Warner Chilcott, PLC – Class “A” | 8,568,750 | |||||
81,392,000 | |||||||
Industrials—17.1% | |||||||
140,000 | A.O. Smith Corporation | 6,328,000 | |||||
180,000 | Altra Holdings, Inc. | 4,843,800 | |||||
95,000 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 5,221,200 | ||||
100,000 | * | B/E Aerospace, Inc. | 7,382,000 | ||||
140,000 | Chicago Bridge & Iron Company NV – NY Shares | 9,487,800 | |||||
95,000 | Dover Corporation | 8,533,850 | |||||
40,000 | * | Esterline Technologies Corporation | 3,195,600 | ||||
114,100 | G&K Services, Inc. – Class “A” | 6,890,499 | |||||
262,500 | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 11,193,000 | |||||
60,000 | IDEX Corporation | 3,915,000 | |||||
130,000 | ITT Corporation | 4,673,500 | |||||
82,500 | J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | 6,016,725 | |||||
131,400 | Pentair, Ltd. | 8,533,116 | |||||
40,000 | Roper Industries, Inc. | 5,314,800 | |||||
90,000 | Ryder System, Inc. | 5,373,000 | |||||
85,500 | Snap-on, Inc. | 8,507,250 | |||||
115,000 | * | TAL International Group, Inc. | 5,373,950 | ||||
65,500 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 2,480,485 | |||||
80,000 | Triumph Group, Inc. | 5,617,600 | |||||
135,000 | * | United Rentals, Inc. | 7,869,150 | ||||
126,750,325 | |||||||
Information Technology—11.8% | |||||||
250,000 | * | ARRIS Group, Inc. | 4,265,000 | ||||
125,000 | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 5,390,000 | |||||
255,000 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 6,127,650 | ||||
149,000 | * | CDW Corporation | 3,401,670 | ||||
45,000 | * | Fiserv, Inc. | 4,547,250 | ||||
230,000 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 2,582,900 | |||||
360,000 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 8,413,200 | |||||
180,000 | Microchip Technology, Inc. | 7,252,200 | |||||
250,500 | * | NeuStar, Inc. – Class “A” | 12,394,740 | ||||
325,000 | Symantec Corporation | 8,043,750 | |||||
420,000 | * | Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 7,627,200 |
135 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Information Technology (continued) | |||||||
160,000 | TE Connectivity, Ltd. | $ 8,284,800 | |||||
275,000 | Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 8,808,250 | |||||
87,138,610 | |||||||
Materials—8.0% | |||||||
100,000 | Cytec Industries, Inc. | 8,136,000 | |||||
80,000 | Eastman Chemical Company | 6,232,000 | |||||
247,322 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 8,181,412 | |||||
190,000 | International Paper Company | 8,512,000 | |||||
40,000 | Praxair, Inc. | 4,808,400 | |||||
149,600 | Rock-Tenn Company – Class “A” | 15,149,992 | |||||
55,000 | Sigma-Aldrich Corporation | 4,691,500 | |||||
37,500 | Westlake Chemical Corporation | 3,924,750 | |||||
59,636,054 | |||||||
Telecommunication Services—.7% | |||||||
272,000 | NTELOS Holdings Corporation | 5,113,600 | |||||
Utilities—3.2% | |||||||
111,000 | AGL Resources, Inc. | 5,109,330 | |||||
144,800 | Portland General Electric Company | 4,087,704 | |||||
135,000 | SCANA Corporation | 6,215,400 | |||||
200,000 | Wisconsin Energy Corporation | 8,076,000 | |||||
23,488,434 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $446,878,657) | 714,975,812 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.9% | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills: | |||||||
$ 4,000 | M | 0.0005%, 10/10/2013 | 4,000,000 | ||||
10,000 | M | 0.016%, 10/17/2013 | 9,999,929 | ||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Obligations (cost $13,999,929) | 13,999,929 |
136 |
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.5% | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
$ 1,000 | M | 0.02%, 10/2/2013 | $ 999,999 | ||||
10,000 | M | 0.02%, 10/11/2013 | 9,999,944 | ||||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $10,999,943) | 10,999,943 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $471,878,529) | 99.9 | % | 739,975,684 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .1 | 645,175 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $740,620,859 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
137 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2013
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observ- | |
able for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include | ||
quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar | ||
instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates | ||
and similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 714,975,812 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 714,975,812 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 13,999,929 | — | 13,999,929 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Agency Obligations | — | 10,999,943 | — | 10,999,943 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 714,975,812 | $ | 24,999,872 | $ | — | $ | 739,975,684 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
138 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors Special Situations Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. First Investors Management Company, Inc. assumed portfolio management responsibilities for the Fund from the previous subadviser effective September 23, 2013. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 20.5% for Class A shares and 19.6% for Class B shares, including capital gains distributions of $1.00 per share for both Class A and Class B shares, and dividends of 11.6 cents and 8.2 cents per share on Class A and Class B shares, respectively. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 9.3% for Advisor Class shares and 9.5% for Institutional Class shares. The Fund did not declare any dividends or capital gains on the Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares.
Fund performance for fiscal year 2013 was positive; however, it did not keep up with the broader market, as stocks rallied in anticipation of another round of quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve. The Fund’s underperformance this year was exacerbated by poor stock selection.
The Fund’s absolute performance was mainly attributable to investments in information technology and consumer discretionary stocks. Among information technology stocks held by the fund, TriQuint Semiconductor — which makes components for the consumer smartphone market — benefited from strong demand for its radio frequency component used in 4G LTE networks. Among consumer discretionary stocks, Express Inc. — which retails apparel and accessories for women and men between 20 and 30 years-old — outperformed its competitors despite weak mall traffic. Express delivered good quality fashion that its target customer found appealing.
On a relative basis, the Fund underperformed the Russell 2000 Index primarily due to stock selection in the financials sector and allocation in the industrials. Among financial stocks, Anworth Mortgage Asset Corp (a REIT that invests in mortgage-backed securities) suffered from higher-than-expected mortgage prepayments and lower-than-expected interest rates, which pressured net income. Among industrials stocks, the Fund only held nine positions for most of the year. While they all did well, they simply did not do well enough to keep up with what would turn out to be the best performing sector in the Russell 2000 Index.
139 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
The Fund’s top-performing sector on a relative basis for the reporting period was consumer discretionary. Express Inc. — which is discussed above — was the primary driver of outperformance. Deckers Outdoor Corporation — a footwear and accessories maker known for its UGG footwear — launched a series of initiatives to reduce excess inventory and to lower manufacturing costs. Investors rewarded the company’s stock on its improved earnings outlook.
As we move forward with the Fund, we intend to use a “bottom-up” approach to selecting investments that emphasizes fundamental research. We also plan to increase the number of holdings in the Fund to increase diversification. We will continue to invest primarily in common stocks of small-size companies that we believe are undervalued and that generally are experiencing a “special situation.” Developments creating special situations may include mergers, spin-offs, litigation resolution, new products or management changes. As of the end of the review period, portfolio repositioning is underway, and we look forward to updating you on our progress.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
* Effective September 23, 2013, Steven S. Hill became Portfolio Manager of the Special Situations Fund. |
140 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.35% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,077.94 | $ 7.03 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,018.30 | $ 6.83 | |
Class B Shares | 2.13% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,073.73 | $11.07 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,014.39 | $10.76 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.16% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,092.56 | $ 6.09 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.25 | $ 5.87 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 0.84% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,094.51 | $ 4.41 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,020.86 | $ 4.26 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the | |
period are net of expenses waived. | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total market value of investments.
141 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Special Situations Fund (Class A shares) and the Russell 2000 Index.
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 20.47% | 19.62% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 10.30% | 9.53% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 9.15% | 9.00% | 9.26% | 9.45% |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 13.54% | 15.62% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 9.00% | 9.25% | N/A | N/A |
Ten Years, Since Inception** | 8.50% | 9.00% | 9.26% | 9.45% |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Special Situations Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/03 with a theoretical investment in the Russell 2000 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged Index that measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Index consists of the smallest 2,000 companies in the Russell 3000 Index (which represents approximately 98% of the investable U.S. equity market). It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
142 |
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 13.45%, 8.89% and 8.40%, respectively. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 15.54%, 9.14% and 8.73%, respectively. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 5.43%. The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 5.69%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Frank Russell and Company and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations)
143 |
Portfolio of Investments
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
COMMON STOCKS—94.0% | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary—21.1% | |||||||
181,850 | Best Buy Company, Inc. | $ 6,819,375 | |||||
175,000 | CST Brands, Inc. | 5,215,000 | |||||
300,000 | Dana Holding Corporation | 6,852,000 | |||||
30,000 | * | Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 1,977,600 | ||||
130,000 | * | Express, Inc. | 3,066,700 | ||||
55,000 | Hanesbrands, Inc. | 3,427,050 | |||||
100,000 | Harman International Industries, Inc. | 6,623,000 | |||||
60,000 | * | Jarden Corporation | 2,904,000 | ||||
125,000 | * | Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. | 2,318,750 | ||||
22,200 | Loral Space & Communications, Inc. | 1,503,606 | |||||
253,175 | * | M/I Homes, Inc. | 5,220,469 | ||||
148,875 | * | Meritage Homes Corporation | 6,394,181 | ||||
250,000 | * | Orient-Express Hotels, Ltd. – Class “A” | 3,245,000 | ||||
234,500 | Pier 1 Imports, Inc. | 4,577,440 | |||||
36,900 | PVH Corporation | 4,379,661 | |||||
200,000 | Regal Entertainment Group – Class “A” | 3,796,000 | |||||
48,300 | Ruth’s Hospitality Group, Inc. | 572,838 | |||||
175,000 | * | Select Comfort Corporation | 4,261,250 | ||||
95,000 | * | Starz-Liberty Capital – Class “A” | 2,672,350 | ||||
65,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 5,614,050 | |||||
75,000 | * | Visteon Corporation | 5,673,000 | ||||
39,916 | * | WMS Industries, Inc. | 1,035,820 | ||||
88,149,140 | |||||||
Consumer Staples—3.0% | |||||||
2,300 | * | Amira Nature Foods, Ltd. | 29,762 | ||||
35,000 | Herbalife, Ltd. | 2,441,950 | |||||
45,000 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 4,308,300 | |||||
100,000 | Pinnacle Foods, Inc. | 2,647,000 | |||||
150,000 | * | WhiteWave Foods Company – Class “A” | 2,995,500 | ||||
12,422,512 | |||||||
Energy—10.1% | |||||||
258,275 | * | Approach Resources, Inc. | 6,787,467 | ||||
65,118 | Calumet Specialty Products Partners, LP | 1,777,070 | |||||
40,000 | Ensco, PLC – Class “A” | 2,150,000 | |||||
277,291 | * | Matrix Service Company | 5,440,449 | ||||
290,750 | * | Midstates Petroleum Company, Inc. | 1,491,548 | ||||
85,000 | Noble Corporation | 3,210,450 |
144 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Energy (continued) | |||||||
698,222 | * | PetroQuest Energy, Inc. | $ 2,799,870 | ||||
207,700 | * | Stone Energy Corporation | 6,735,711 | ||||
222,775 | Western Refining, Inc. | 6,692,161 | |||||
85,200 | * | Whiting Petroleum Corporation | 5,099,220 | ||||
42,183,946 | |||||||
Financials—13.0% | |||||||
135,600 | American Financial, Inc. | 7,330,536 | |||||
475,850 | Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation (REIT) | 2,298,355 | |||||
14,200 | Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (REIT) | 140,722 | |||||
100,000 | Aspen Insurance Holdings, Ltd. | 3,629,000 | |||||
111,500 | Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc. | 2,799,765 | |||||
60,000 | City National Corporation | 3,999,600 | |||||
150,000 | Douglas Emmett, Inc. (REIT) | 3,520,500 | |||||
50,000 | * | EZCORP, Inc. – Class “A” | 844,000 | ||||
40,000 | Federal Realty Investment Trust (REIT) | 4,058,000 | |||||
125,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 2,490,000 | |||||
175,000 | FirstMerit Corporation | 3,799,250 | |||||
168,150 | Montpelier Re Holdings, Ltd. | 4,380,308 | |||||
113,600 | Oritani Financial Corporation | 1,869,856 | |||||
100,000 | Protective Life Corporation | 4,255,000 | |||||
217,900 | Provident New York Bancorp | 2,372,931 | |||||
100,000 | SPDR S&P Regional Banking (ETF) | 3,565,000 | |||||
55,000 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,831,400 | |||||
54,184,223 | |||||||
Health Care—6.5% | |||||||
115,000 | * | Centene Corporation | 7,355,400 | ||||
56,178 | * | Life Technologies Corporation | 4,203,800 | ||||
267,450 | Masimo Corporation | 7,124,868 | |||||
100,000 | Omnicare, Inc. | 5,550,000 | |||||
72,875 | PerkinElmer, Inc. | 2,751,031 | |||||
26,985,099 | |||||||
Industrials—9.1% | |||||||
45,000 | Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc. | 2,317,500 | |||||
85,000 | G&K Services, Inc. – Class “A” | 5,133,150 | |||||
150,000 | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 6,396,000 | |||||
125,000 | ITT Corporation | 4,493,750 | |||||
127,600 | Kelly Services, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,484,372 |
145 |
Portfolio of Investments
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
Industrials (continued) | |||||||
170,900 | Kforce, Inc. | $ 3,023,221 | |||||
10,000 | Precision Castparts Corporation | 2,272,400 | |||||
73,975 | Ryder System, Inc. | 4,416,308 | |||||
45,000 | Snap-on, Inc. | 4,477,500 | |||||
50,000 | * | United Rentals, Inc. | 2,914,500 | ||||
37,928,701 | |||||||
Information Technology—21.3% | |||||||
175,000 | Avnet, Inc. | 7,299,250 | |||||
190,000 | * | Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. | 4,565,700 | ||||
200,000 | * | CDW Corporation | 4,566,000 | ||||
349,300 | * | Demand Media, Inc. | 2,207,576 | ||||
126,850 | IAC/InterActiveCorp | 6,934,889 | |||||
600,000 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 6,738,000 | |||||
238,275 | Lender Processing Services, Inc. | 7,927,409 | |||||
210,000 | Mentor Graphics Corporation | 4,907,700 | |||||
125,000 | Microchip Technology, Inc. | 5,036,250 | |||||
200,000 | * | Microsemi Corporation | 4,850,000 | ||||
90,000 | * | NeuStar, Inc. – Class “A” | 4,453,200 | ||||
191,975 | * | Progress Software Corporation | 4,968,313 | ||||
590,200 | * | QLogic Corporation | 6,456,788 | ||||
75,000 | * | Skyworks Solutions, Inc. | 1,863,000 | ||||
275,000 | * | Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 4,994,000 | ||||
750,000 | * | TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. | 6,097,500 | ||||
60,000 | * | Verint Systems, Inc. | 2,223,600 | ||||
225,000 | * | Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 2,900,250 | ||||
88,989,425 | |||||||
Materials—5.1% | |||||||
103,000 | AptarGroup, Inc. | 6,193,390 | |||||
141,125 | * | Boise Cascade Company | 3,803,319 | ||||
40,000 | Innospec, Inc. | 1,866,400 | |||||
50,000 | Sensient Technologies Corporation | 2,394,500 | |||||
68,115 | Westlake Chemical Corporation | 7,128,916 | |||||
21,386,525 |
146 |
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Telecommunication Services—1.4% | |||||||
40,000 | iShares U.S. Telecommunications (ETF) | $ 1,103,200 | |||||
125,000 | NTELOS Holdings Corporation | 2,350,000 | |||||
225,000 | * | Premiere Global Services, Inc. | 2,241,000 | ||||
5,694,200 | |||||||
Utilities—3.4% | |||||||
90,000 | AGL Resources, Inc. | 4,142,700 | |||||
90,000 | Portland General Electric Company | 2,540,700 | |||||
75,000 | SCANA Corporation | 3,453,000 | |||||
100,000 | Wisconsin Energy Corporation | 4,038,000 | |||||
14,174,400 | |||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $334,992,726) | 392,098,171 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—2.7% | |||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills: | |||||||
$10,000 | M | 0.0005%, 10/10/2013 | 9,999,999 | ||||
1,000 | M | 0.01%, 11/7/2013 | 999,990 | ||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Obligations (cost $10,999,989) | 10,999,989 | ||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $345,992,715) | 96.7 | % | 403,098,160 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 3.3 | 13,938,313 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $417,036,473 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
147 |
Portfolio of Investments
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2013
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observ- | |
able for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include | ||
quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar | ||
instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates | ||
and similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 392,098,171 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 392,098,171 | ||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 10,999,989 | — | 10,999,989 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 392,098,171 | $ | 10,999,989 | $ | — | $ | 403,098,160 |
* | The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for the portfolio. |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund for the year ended September 30, 2013. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
148 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Dear Investor:
I’m pleased to send you the First Investors International Fund annual report for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 7.3% for Class A shares and 6.5% for Class B shares. The Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was –1.9% for Advisor Class shares and –1.8% for Institutional Class shares. The Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares commenced operations on April 1, 2013, but Advisor Class shares were not available to the public until October 1, 2013.
Equity markets were strong across most major economies with cyclical stocks and peripheral European markets performing well, coinciding with low interest rates across southern Europe, stable economic growth in China and other critical market indicators.
The outlook for the U.S. economy began to improve, but then backtracked thanks to a “rate normalization” scare caused by upbeat Federal Reserve (“the Fed”) comments. This scare also tested the structural integrity of a number of developing countries as money that had streamed from the U.S. and Europe to emerging markets since the 2008–2009 crisis quickly reversed course.
By September 30, 2013, most emerging market currencies — with the exception of the Indian rupee and Indonesian rupiah — had regained lost ground, and central banks began reversing some of the sharp short-term rate increases they implemented as emergency measures to encourage investors to remain invested in their countries.
In the second calendar quarter of 2013, after seven quarters of persistent, disappointing economic data, the Eurozone managed its first quarter-on-quarter growth (0.3%), although it continued to decline (–0.5%) versus the same quarter of the previous year.
This positive bump — alongside Angela Merkel’s CDU party winning the German elections — was regarded by the markets as a positive step towards stability.
General comfort was also reflected in the market signals of low interest rates across the European periphery with the Spanish and Italian 10-year sovereign rates both ending the quarter around 4.4%.
However, we are not convinced that sustainable growth is imminent for the Eurozone. While stability appears at hand, growth remains questionable. Serious problems remain in the periphery and exporters such as Germany may be challenged by a strong currency and slowing growth in historically fast growing countries such as China.
In the second calendar quarter of 2013, year-over-year GDP fell in Greece (–4.6%), Spain (–1.6%), Portugal (–2%), and Italy (–2%) — drops that have few quick remedies and would have little fallout if Europe had a transfer-of-wealth mechanism similar to the U.S. — which, unfortunately, it does not.
Countries that run a deficit need to borrow or undergo fiscal consolidation, which weakens growth in the short term. Further, the European banks are shrinking their balance sheets
149 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
INTERNATIONAL FUND
(partly because of the need to improve their leverage ratios), creating another headwind to a return to sustained economic growth.
China recorded second calendar quarter 2013 GDP growth of 7.5%, a strong pace in global terms, but slightly slower than achieved in 2012. During the past fiscal year there has been a concerning trend in China; Chinese authorities and the Chinese press have accused multiple foreign consumer and pharmaceutical firms of illegal activity, which poses an ongoing risk for all western multinational corporations with large operations inside China’s borders.
Elsewhere, Mexico has been making progress on the “Pacto por Mexico” program of 95 initiatives. The government announced an increase in its value-added tax to lift its low tax base. It also announced the indirect opening of the oil industry to foreign companies through profit sharing agreements — an important step given that oil income from Pemex accounts for up to 40% of federal government funding currently.
Contributing to relative performance during the fiscal year were the Fund’s underweight exposures to the energy and utilities sectors and its selection of specific energy stocks. On the downside was our selection of financial and materials stocks. An underweighting in financials — a top performer in the benchmark — also hurt results.
The Fund’s stock selection in Hong Kong and Switzerland also contributed to performance for the year, as did our overweight exposure to Switzerland. Our out-of-benchmark holdings in India dragged down relative performance, as did the Fund’s underweight and stock selection in Japan.
On an absolute basis, UBS, Valeant Pharmaceuticals, Core Laboratories, Sands China and HSBC Holdings were the top contributors to performance during the fiscal year; Newcrest Mining, Goldcorp, Fresnillo, Housing Development Finance Corp. and HDFC Bank were the bottom contributors.
Relative to the benchmark, UBS, Valeant Pharmaceuticals, Sands China, Core Laboratories and Royal Dutch Shell were the top performers during the year; Newcrest Mining, Housing Development Finance Corp., Goldcorp, HDFC Bank and Fresnillo were the bottom performers.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
150 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 2 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Annualized | Beginning | Ending | Expenses Paid | |
Expense | Account Value | Account Value | During Period | |
Expense Example | Ratio | (4/1/13) | (9/30/13) | (4/1/13–9/30/13)* |
Class A Shares | 1.68% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 978.14 | $ 8.33 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,016.65 | $ 8.49 | |
Class B Shares | 2.49% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 973.99 | $12.32 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,012.59 | $12.56 | |
Advisor Class Shares | 1.45% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 981.23 | $ 7.20 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,017.80 | $ 7.33 | |
Institutional Class Shares | 1.19% | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $ 982.02 | $ 5.91 | |
Hypothetical** | $1,000.00 | $1,019.10 | $ 6.02 |
* | Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over |
the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). | |
** | Assumed rate of return of 5% before expenses. |
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2013, and are based on the total market value of investments.
151 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Fund (Class A shares), the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) EAFE Index (Gross) and the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) EAFE Index (Net).
Average Annual Total Returns* | ||||
Advisor | Institutional | |||
N.A.V. Only | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 7.28% | 6.49% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 6.83% | 6.08% | N/A | N/A |
Since Inception** | 4.31% | 3.59% | (1.88%) | (1.80%) |
Advisor | Institutional | |||
S.E.C. Standardized | Class A | Class B | Class | Class |
One Year | 1.13% | 2.49% | N/A | N/A |
Five Years | 5.57% | 5.76% | N/A | N/A |
Since Inception** | 3.47% | 3.59% | (1.88%) | (1.80%) |
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Fund (Class A shares) beginning 6/27/06 (commencement of operations) with theoretical investments in the MSCI EAFE Index (Gross) and the MSCI EAFE Index (Net) (the “Indices”). The Indices are free float-adjusted market capitalization indices that measure developed foreign market equity performance, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The Indices consist of 22 developed market country indices. The MSCI EAFE Index (Gross) is calculated on a total-return basis with the maximum possible dividend reinvestment (before taxes). The MSCI EAFE Index (Net) is calculated on a total-return basis with the minimum possible dividend reinvestment (after taxes). The Indices are unmanaged and it is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the
152 |
initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares, Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/13) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). The Advisor Class and Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are the same as the N.A.V. Only returns since these classes are sold without sales charges. During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 3.11%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been 3.03%. The Advisor Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (5.73%). The Institutional Class “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (5.45%). Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Indices figures are from Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
**The returns for Class A shares and Class B shares are for the periods beginning 6/26/06 (commencement of operations). The returns for Advisor Class shares and Institutional Class shares are for the periods beginning 4/1/13 (commencement of operations).
153 |
Portfolio of Investments
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
COMMON STOCKS—96.7% | |||||||
United Kingdom—22.5% | |||||||
385,195 | * | Barratt Developments, PLC | $ 1,925,008 | ||||
234,013 | British American Tobacco, PLC | 12,416,699 | |||||
193,327 | Diageo, PLC | 6,151,926 | |||||
232,737 | Domino’s Pizza Group, PLC | 2,201,072 | |||||
234,343 | Fresnillo, PLC | 3,692,503 | |||||
451,344 | HSBC Holdings, PLC | 4,892,709 | |||||
5,785 | Intertek Group, PLC | 309,621 | |||||
152,026 | * | Persimmon, PLC | 2,673,645 | ||||
214,858 | * | Rolls-Royce Holdings, PLC | 3,869,121 | ||||
130,106 | SABMiller, PLC | 6,623,184 | |||||
187,199 | Standard Chartered, PLC | 4,489,672 | |||||
49,245,160 | |||||||
Switzerland—16.5% | |||||||
46,579 | DKSH Holding, Ltd. | 3,976,664 | |||||
968 | Lindt & Spruengli AG | 3,972,627 | |||||
134,289 | Nestle SA – Registered | 9,393,176 | |||||
22,364 | Novartis AG – Registered | 1,718,881 | |||||
2,036 | Roche Holding AG – Genusscheine | 549,163 | |||||
2,775 | SGS SA – Registered | 6,625,629 | |||||
479,649 | * | UBS AG – Registered | 9,813,112 | ||||
36,049,252 | |||||||
India—9.2% | |||||||
572,114 | HDFC Bank, Ltd. | 5,419,570 | |||||
369 | HDFC Bank, Ltd. (ADR) | 11,358 | |||||
143,603 | Hindustan Unilever, Ltd. | 1,439,241 | |||||
596,824 | Housing Development Finance Corporation, Ltd. | 7,285,724 | |||||
1,087,858 | ITC, Ltd. | 5,914,973 | |||||
20,070,866 | |||||||
France—8.7% | |||||||
219,976 | Bureau Veritas SA | 6,938,085 | |||||
30,780 | Essilor International SA | 3,312,410 | |||||
4,850 | Hermes International | 1,747,008 | |||||
19,998 | L’Oreal SA | 3,436,589 | |||||
28,837 | Pernod Ricard SA | 3,583,058 | |||||
19,017,150 |
154 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||||
United States—7.7% | |||||||
38,636 | Accenture, PLC – Class “A” | $ 2,845,155 | |||||
54,200 | Covidien, PLC | 3,302,948 | |||||
123,445 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 10,689,103 | |||||
16,837,206 | |||||||
Netherlands—7.4% | |||||||
39,774 | Core Laboratories NV | 6,730,159 | |||||
241,268 | Unilever NV – CVA | 9,391,208 | |||||
16,121,367 | |||||||
Canada—6.7% | |||||||
29,324 | Alimentation Couche-Tard – Class “B” | 1,828,364 | |||||
63,528 | Bank of Nova Scotia | 3,648,271 | |||||
91,819 | Enbridge, Inc. | 3,840,158 | |||||
183,736 | Goldcorp, Inc. | 4,788,683 | |||||
20,684 | Silver Wheaton Corporation | 513,528 | |||||
14,619,004 | |||||||
Australia—3.4% | |||||||
32,542 | CSL, Ltd. | 1,947,420 | |||||
248,962 | Newcrest Mining, Ltd. | 2,723,669 | |||||
82,361 | Ramsay Health Care, Ltd. | 2,788,596 | |||||
7,459,685 | |||||||
Hong Kong—3.3% | |||||||
141,527 | Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings, Ltd. | 980,906 | |||||
424,719 | Link REIT (REIT) | 2,083,849 | |||||
572,268 | L’Occitane International SA | 1,494,288 | |||||
424,691 | Sands China, Ltd. | 2,625,859 | |||||
7,184,902 | |||||||
Denmark—3.0% | |||||||
38,811 | Novo Nordisk A/S – Series “B” | 6,593,358 | |||||
Germany—1.4% | |||||||
42,554 | SAP AG | 3,149,183 | |||||
Japan—1.2% | |||||||
27,000 | Daito Trust Construction Company, Ltd. | 2,699,312 |
155 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2013
Shares or | |||||||
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
Ireland—1.2% | |||||||
32,577 | Paddy Power, PLC | $ 2,612,810 | |||||
Mexico—1.1% | |||||||
947,220 | Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV | 2,465,237 | |||||
Brazil—.8% | |||||||
68,039 | Cielo SA | 1,834,200 | |||||
Spain—.8% | |||||||
42,466 | Grifols SA | 1,744,650 | |||||
Sweden—.7% | |||||||
95,517 | Elekta AB – Class “B” | 1,537,647 | |||||
Italy—.6% | |||||||
26,615 | Luxottica Group SpA | 1,416,604 | |||||
Indonesia—.5% | |||||||
5,932,389 | PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Persero Tbk | 1,075,822 | |||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $165,977,533) | 211,733,415 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—2.7% | |||||||
$6,000 | M | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.02%, 10/11/2013 (cost $5,999,967) | 5,999,967 | ||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $171,977,500) | 99.4 | % | 217,733,382 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .6 | 1,341,649 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $219,075,031 |
* | Non-income producing |
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ADR | American Depositary Receipts |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
156 |
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has | |
the ability to access. | ||
Level 2 — | Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable | |
for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted | ||
prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instru- | ||
ments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and | ||
similar data. | ||
Level 3 — | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs | |
are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumption about the assumptions a | ||
market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on | ||
the best information available. |
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected as Level 2.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2013:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||
United Kingdom | $ | 49,245,160 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 49,245,160 | ||||
Switzerland | 36,049,252 | — | — | 36,049,252 | ||||||||
India | 20,070,866 | — | — | 20,070,866 | ||||||||
France | 19,017,150 | — | — | 19,017,150 | ||||||||
United States | 16,837,206 | — | — | 16,837,206 | ||||||||
Netherlands | 16,121,367 | — | — | 16,121,367 | ||||||||
Canada | 14,619,004 | — | — | 14,619,004 | ||||||||
Australia | 7,459,685 | — | — | 7,459,685 | ||||||||
Hong Kong | 7,184,902 | — | — | 7,184,902 | ||||||||
Denmark | 6,593,358 | — | — | 6,593,358 | ||||||||
Germany | 3,149,183 | — | — | 3,149,183 | ||||||||
Japan | 2,699,312 | — | — | 2,699,312 | ||||||||
Ireland | 2,612,810 | — | — | 2,612,810 | ||||||||
Mexico | 2,465,237 | — | — | 2,465,237 | ||||||||
Brazil | 1,834,200 | — | — | 1,834,200 | ||||||||
Spain | 1,744,650 | — | — | 1,744,650 | ||||||||
Sweden | 1,537,647 | — | — | 1,537,647 | ||||||||
Italy | 1,416,604 | — | — | 1,416,604 | ||||||||
Indonesia | 1,075,822 | — | — | 1,075,822 |
157 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2013
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Agency | ||||||||||||
Government Obligations | — | 5,999,967 | — | 5,999,967 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | ||||||||||||
$ | 211,733,415 | $ | 5,999,967 | $ | — | $ | 217,733,382 |
During the year ended September 30, 2013, there were no transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments that had a material impact to the Fund. This does not include transfers between Level 1 investments and Level 2 investments due to the Fund utilizing international fair value pricing during the period. Transfers, if any, between Levels are recognized at the end of the reporting period.
158 | See notes to financial statements |
This page left intentionally blank. |
159 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
September 30, 2013
INTERNATIONAL | |||||||||||||||||
CASH | INVESTMENT | STRATEGIC | OPPORTUNITIES | FUND FOR | |||||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | GOVERNMENT | GRADE | INCOME | BOND | INCOME | ||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||
Investments in securities: | |||||||||||||||||
Cost – Unaffiliated issuers | $ | 129,379,956 | $ | 363,369,181 | $ | 523,601,510 | $ | — | $ | 103,644,228 | $ | 646,480,282 | |||||
Cost – Affiliated issuers (Note 2) | — | — | — | 44,864,608 | — | — | |||||||||||
Total cost of investments | $ | 129,379,956 | $ | 363,369,181 | $ | 523,601,510 | $ | 44,864,608 | $ | 103,644,228 | $ | 646,480,282 | |||||
Value – Unaffiliated issuers (Note 1A) | $ | 129,379,956 | $ | 368,772,622 | $ | 548,724,053 | $ | — | $ | 101,264,157 | $ | 655,235,174 | |||||
Value – Affiliated issuers (Note 2) | — | — | — | 44,264,539 | — | — | |||||||||||
Total value of investments | 129,379,956 | 368,772,622 | 548,724,053 | 44,264,539 | 101,264,157 | 655,235,174 | |||||||||||
Cash | 1,722,528 | 16,112,871 | 3,697,201 | 3,032,115 | 4,918,863 | 12,236,172 | |||||||||||
Receivables: | |||||||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | 17,178,006 | 3,902,708 | — | — | 5,484,150 | |||||||||||
Dividends and interest | 6,978 | 1,097,343 | 7,677,452 | 167,985 | 1,154,804 | 12,040,907 | |||||||||||
Shares sold | — | 742,573 | 922,905 | 513,783 | 447,460 | 1,053,126 | |||||||||||
Unrealized gain on foreign exchange contracts (Note 7) | — | — | — | — | 395,570 | — | |||||||||||
Other assets | 12,304 | 30,464 | 39,575 | — | 544 | 48,149 | |||||||||||
Total Assets | 131,121,766 | 403,933,879 | 564,963,894 | 47,978,422 | 108,181,398 | 686,097,678 | |||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | — | 38,273,529 | 3,996,944 | 545,943 | 625,757 | 12,716,746 | |||||||||||
Shares redeemed | 215,934 | 706,117 | 1,012,204 | 6,595 | 74,540 | 1,141,883 | |||||||||||
Dividends payable | — | 60,660 | 152,675 | 4,316 | 23,882 | 541,773 | |||||||||||
Unrealized loss on foreign exchange contracts (Note 7) | — | — | — | 1,134,612 | — | ||||||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | — | 162,724 | 257,657 | — | 70,160 | 396,076 | |||||||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 37,320 | 50,881 | 68,621 | 9,679 | 25,532 | 79,646 | |||||||||||
Accrued expenses | 24,293 | 42,213 | 33,005 | 66,429 | 66,453 | 41,498 | |||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 277,547 | 39,296,124 | 5,521,106 | 632,962 | 2,020,936 | 14,917,622 | |||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 130,844,219 | $ | 364,637,755 | $ | 559,442,788 | $ | 47,345,460 | $ | 106,160,462 | $ | 671,180,056 | |||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 130,844,219 | $ | 373,209,599 | $ | 554,324,787 | $ | 47,901,726 | $ | 109,724,404 | $ | 832,225,354 | |||||
Undistributed net investment income (deficit) | — | 55,298 | (6,419,736 | ) | 23,016 | 62,663 | (2,865,084 | ) | |||||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments, futures | |||||||||||||||||
contracts and foreign currency transactions | — | (14,030,583 | ) | (13,584,806 | ) | 20,787 | (498,179 | ) | (166,935,106 | ) | |||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in value | |||||||||||||||||
of investments and foreign currency transactions | — | 5,403,441 | 25,122,543 | (600,069 | ) | (3,128,426 | ) | 8,754,892 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 130,844,219 | $ | 364,637,755 | $ | 559,442,788 | $ | 47,345,460 | $ | 106,160,462 | $ | 671,180,056 |
160 | See notes to financial statements | 161 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
September 30, 2013
INTERNATIONAL | |||||||||||||
CASH | INVESTMENT | STRATEGIC | OPPORTUNITIES | FUND FOR | |||||||||
MANAGEMENT | GOVERNMENT | GRADE | INCOME | BOND | INCOME | ||||||||
Net Assets: | |||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 130,272,155 | $ | 355,263,948 | $ | 543,955,034 | $ | 47,344,468 | $ | 99,161,179 | $ | 647,603,043 | |
Class B | $ | 571,064 | $ | 4,717,033 | $ | 6,160,851 | N/A | N/A | $ | 5,000,518 | |||
Advisor Class | N/A | $ | 983 | $ | 978 | $ | 992 | $ | 977 | $ | 1,003 | ||
Institutional Class | $ | 1,000 | $ | 4,655,791 | $ | 9,325,925 | N/A | $ | 6,998,306 | $ | 18,575,492 | ||
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | |||||||||||||
Class A | 130,272,155 | 32,478,672 | 55,606,646 | 4,840,298 | 10,078,549 | 249,780,785 | |||||||
Class B | 571,064 | 432,106 | 631,346 | N/A | N/A | 1,930,956 | |||||||
Advisor Class | N/A | 90 | 100 | 102 | 99 | 387 | |||||||
Institutional Class | 1,000 | 424,711 | 952,222 | N/A | 710,335 | 7,144,989 | |||||||
Net asset value and redemption price | |||||||||||||
per share – Class A | $ | 1.00 | # | $ | 10.94 | $ | 9.78 | $ | 9.78 | $ | 9.84 | $ | 2.59 |
Maximum offering price per share – Class A | |||||||||||||
(Net asset value/.9425)* | N/A | $ | 11.61 | $ | 10.38 | $ | 10.38 | $ | 10.44 | $ | 2.75 | ||
Net asset value and offering price per share – | |||||||||||||
Class B** | $ | 1.00 | $ | 10.92 | $ | 9.76 | N/A | N/A | $ | 2.59 | |||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | |||||||||||||
per share – Advisor Class | N/A | $ | 10.94 | $ | 9.78 | $ | 9.77 | $ | 9.85 | $ | 2.59 | ||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | |||||||||||||
per share – Institutional Class | $ | 1.00 | $ | 10.96 | $ | 9.79 | N/A | $ | 9.85 | $ | 2.60 |
# Also maximum offering price per share.
* On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced.
** Redemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable.
162 | See notes to financial statements | 163 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
TOTAL | EQUITY | GROWTH & | |||||||
RETURN | INCOME | INCOME | GLOBAL | ||||||
Assets | |||||||||
Investments in securities: | |||||||||
At identified cost | $ | 524,974,709 | $ | 370,397,436 | $ | 1,020,308,325 | $ | 245,527,678 | |
At value (Note 1A) | $ | 680,097,656 | $ | 486,446,523 | $ | 1,569,974,947 | $ | 317,753,625 | |
Cash | 245,071 | 1,628,861 | 434,014 | 1,536,271 | |||||
Receivables: | |||||||||
Investment securities sold | 10,345,027 | 1,567,705 | 929,484 | 4,159,751 | |||||
Dividends and interest | 3,192,377 | 772,025 | 1,539,108 | 608,727 | |||||
Shares sold | 1,162,348 | 847,605 | 2,512,635 | 427,896 | |||||
Other assets | 37,241 | 31,200 | 94,612 | 24,350 | |||||
Total Assets | 695,079,720 | 491,293,919 | 1,575,484,800 | 324,510,620 | |||||
Liabilities | |||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||
Investment securities purchased | 18,926,828 | 3,610,956 | 5,659,815 | 1,926,351 | |||||
Shares redeemed. | 1,303,697 | 747,193 | 2,242,699 | 511,413 | |||||
Dividends payable | 35,494 | 38,761 | 18,951 | — | |||||
Accrued advisory fees | 403,252 | 303,914 | 908,955 | 198,719 | |||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 86,239 | 65,880 | 214,037 | 52,555 | |||||
Accrued expenses | 60,958 | 50,493 | 94,601 | 70,923 | |||||
Total Liabilities | 20,816,468 | 4,817,197 | 9,139,058 | 2,759,961 | |||||
Net Assets | $ | 674,263,252 | $ | 486,476,722 | $ | 1,566,345,742 | $ | 321,750,659 | |
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 510,515,010 | $ | 365,083,813 | $ | 967,544,310 | $ | 251,911,018 | |
Undistributed net investment income (deficit) | (2,274,431 | 2,668,541 | 5,564,922 | 1,142,588 | |||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | |||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 10,899,726 | 2,675,281 | 43,569,888 | (3,543,274 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation in value of investments | |||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 155,122,947 | 116,049,087 | 549,666,622 | 72,240,327 | |||||
Total | $ | 674,263,252 | $ | 486,476,722 | $ | 1,566,345,742 | $ | 321,750,659 |
164 | See notes to financial statements | 165 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
TOTAL | EQUITY | GROWTH & | ||||||
RETURN | INCOME | INCOME | GLOBAL | |||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||
Class A | $ | 664,053,860 | $ | 475,422,096 | $ | 1,538,581,779 | $ | 317,329,135 |
Class B | $ | 10,207,273 | $ | 6,337,043 | $ | 27,761,730 | $ | 4,419,322 |
Advisor Class | $ | 1,059 | $ | 1,079 | $ | 1,116 | $ | 1,101 |
Institutional Class | $ | 1,060 | $ | 4,716,504 | $ | 1,117 | $ | 1,101 |
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | ||||||||
Class A | 35,908,147 | 52,870,160 | 74,890,461 | 39,630,256 | ||||
Class B | 561,812 | 716,984 | 1,441,535 | 643,988 | ||||
Advisor Class | 57 | 120 | 54 | 137 | ||||
Institutional Class | 57 | 523,138 | 54 | 137 | ||||
Net asset value and redemption price per share – Class A | $ | 18.49 | $ | 8.99 | $ | 20.54 | $ | 8.01 |
Maximum offering price per share – Class A | ||||||||
(Net asset value/.9425)* | $ | 19.62 | $ | 9.54 | $ | 21.79 | $ | 8.50 |
Net asset value and offering price per share – Class B** | $ | 18.17 | $ | 8.84 | $ | 19.26 | $ | 6.86 |
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | $ | 18.49 | $ | 8.99 | $ | 20.54 | $ | 8.01 |
per share – Advisor Class | ||||||||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | $ | 18.50 | $ | 9.02 | $ | 20.55 | $ | 8.02 |
per share – Institutional Class |
* On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced.
** Redemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable.
166 | See notes to financial statements | 167 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
SELECT | SPECIAL | |||||||||
GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | |||||||
Assets | ||||||||||
Investments in securities: | ||||||||||
At identified cost | $ | 240,861,344 | $ | 471,878,529 | $ | 345,992,715 | $ | 171,977,500 | ||
At value (Note 1A) | $ | 320,504,737 | $ | 739,975,684 | $ | 403,098,160 | $ | 217,733,382 | ||
Cash | 662,334 | 1,756,832 | 6,236,497 | 1,029,114 | ||||||
Receivables: | ||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | 1,264,005 | 33,594,854 | 276,710 | ||||||
Dividends and interest | 163,241 | 478,843 | 108,682 | 703,575 | ||||||
Shares sold | 445,213 | 1,095,698 | 584,451 | 545,035 | ||||||
Other assets | 18,836 | 39,574 | 26,210 | 12,379 | ||||||
Total Assets | 321,794,361 | 744,610,636 | 443,648,854 | 220,300,195 | ||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||
Payables: | ||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | — | 2,475,203 | 25,358,493 | 606,497 | ||||||
Shares redeemed | 361,984 | 918,488 | 875,945 | 342,260 | ||||||
Accrued advisory fees | 201,994 | 449,581 | 279,182 | 179,453 | ||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs. | 50,540 | 89,954 | 59,599 | 39,417 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | 36,115 | 56,551 | 39,162 | 57,537 | ||||||
Total Liabilities | 650,633 | 3,989,777 | 26,612,381 | 1,225,164 | ||||||
Net Assets | $ | 321,143,728 | $ | 740,620,859 | $ | 417,036,473 | $ | 219,075,031 | ||
Net Assets Consist of: | ||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 272,699,119 | $ | 423,212,007 | $ | 292,081,263 | $ | 200,076,816 | ||
Undistributed net investment income | 46,929 | 3,100,350 | — | 318,164 | ||||||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | ||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | (31,245,713 | ) | 46,211,347 | 67,849,765 | (27,088,145 | ) | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation in value of investments | ||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 79,643,393 | 268,097,155 | 57,105,445 | 45,768,196 | ||||||
Total | $ | 321,143,728 | $ | 740,620,859 | $ | 417,036,473 | $ | 219,075,031 |
168 | See notes to financial statements | 169 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
SELECT | SPECIAL | |||||||
GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | |||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||
Class A | $ | 315,833,451 | $ | 726,941,888 | $ | 412,102,067 | $ | 215,873,496 |
Class B | $ | 5,308,086 | $ | 13,676,666 | $ | 4,932,219 | $ | 3,199,572 |
Advisor Class | $ | 1,095 | $ | 1,152 | $ | 1,093 | $ | 981 |
Institutional Class | $ | 1,096 | $ | 1,153 | $ | 1,094 | $ | 982 |
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | ||||||||
Class A | 34,165,039 | 19,064,792 | 14,680,724 | 17,228,809 | ||||
Class B | 636,734 | 423,826 | 210,353 | 267,183 | ||||
Advisor Class | 118 | 30 | 39 | 78 | ||||
Institutional Class | 118 | 30 | 39 | 78 | ||||
Net asset value and redemption price per share – Class A | $ | 9.24 | $ | 38.13 | $ | 28.07 | $ | 12.53 |
Maximum offering price per share – Class A | ||||||||
(Net asset value/.9425)* | $ | 9.80 | $ | 40.46 | $ | 29.78 | $ | 13.29 |
Net asset value and offering price per share – Class B** | $ | 8.34 | $ | 32.27 | $ | 23.45 | $ | 11.98 |
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | $ | 9.26 | $ | 38.18 | $ | 28.09 | $ | 12.55 |
per share – Advisor Class | ||||||||
Net asset value, offering price and redemption price | ||||||||
per share – Institutional Class | $ | 9.27 | $ | 38.21 | $ | 28.14 | $ | 12.56 |
* On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced.
** Redemption price is equal to net asset value less contingent deferred sales charges, if applicable.
170 | See notes to financial statements | 171 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2013
INTERNATIONAL | ||||||||||||||||||
CASH | INVESTMENT | STRATEGIC | OPPORTUNITIES | FUND FOR | ||||||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | GOVERNMENT | GRADE | INCOME* | BOND | INCOME | |||||||||||||
Investment Income | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 157,074 | $ | 10,088,043 | $ | 23,782,250 | $ | — | $ | 1,358,362 | (a) | $ | 40,875,185 | |||||
Dividends | — | — | — | — | — | 2,086 | ||||||||||||
Dividends from affiliate (Note 2) | — | — | — | 496,896 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Total income | 157,074 | 10,088,043 | 23,782,250 | 496,896 | 1,358,362 | 40,877,271 | ||||||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | ||||||||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 689,748 | 2,499,304 | 3,670,984 | 5,882 | 532,699 | 4,636,021 | ||||||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | — | 1,116,547 | 1,644,704 | 35,294 | 207,206 | 1,888,241 | ||||||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | 4,528 | 55,205 | 70,608 | N/A | N/A | 52,406 | ||||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class A | 509,937 | 642,614 | 879,897 | 51,146 | 229,362 | 1,068,865 | ||||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class B | 2,216 | 11,808 | 16,120 | N/A | N/A | 12,051 | ||||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Advisor Class | N/A | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | ||||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Institutional Class | 10 | 490 | 1,335 | N/A | 979 | 2,311 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees. | 31,240 | 51,673 | 67,054 | 88,160 | 180,675 | 76,583 | ||||||||||||
Custodian fees | 21,112 | 53,492 | 38,894 | 4,684 | 41,294 | 38,682 | ||||||||||||
Registration fees | 55,384 | 74,934 | 80,437 | 57,965 | 64,951 | 73,946 | ||||||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 12,002 | 12,830 | 18,468 | 1,616 | 6,620 | 23,807 | ||||||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 7,717 | 21,247 | 30,876 | 377 | 3,310 | 34,965 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses | 18,055 | 92,061 | 85,308 | 2,369 | 16,469 | 123,393 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses | 1,351,949 | 4,632,227 | 6,604,707 | 247,515 | 1,283,587 | 8,031,293 | ||||||||||||
Less: Expenses waived and/or assumed | (1,194,223 | ) | (440,966 | ) | (603,638 | ) | (95,449 | ) | (368,384 | ) | (161,100 | ) | ||||||
Expenses paid indirectly | (652 | ) | (390 | ) | (526 | ) | — | (11 | ) | (602 | ) | |||||||
Net expenses | 157,074 | 4,190,871 | 6,000,543 | 152,066 | 915,192 | 7,869,591 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income | — | 5,897,172 | 17,781,707 | 344,830 | 443,170 | 33,007,680 | ||||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments, | ||||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts and Foreign Currency Transactions | ||||||||||||||||||
(Note 2): | ||||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments | — | (2,527,635 | ) | 6,707,924 | 20,787 | 680,088 | 17,247,717 | |||||||||||
Futures contracts | — | 3,234 | (822 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | — | — | — | 627,726 | — | ||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts | ||||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | — | (2,524,401 | ) | 6,707,102 | 20,787 | 1,307,814 | 17,247,717 | |||||||||||
Net unrealized loss on: | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments | — | (12,376,919 | ) | (30,887,049 | ) | (600,069 | ) | (2,764,829 | ) | (15,580,379 | ) | |||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | — | — | — | (739,042 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Net unrealized loss on investments and | ||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | — | (12,376,919 | ) | (30,887,049 | ) | (600,069 | ) | (3,503,871 | ) | (15,580,379 | ) | |||||||
Net gain (loss) on investments, futures contracts and | ||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | — | (14,901,320 | ) | (24,179,947 | ) | (579,282 | ) | (2,196,057 | ) | 1,667,338 | ||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting | ||||||||||||||||||
from Operations | $ | — | $ | (9,004,148 | ) | $ | (6,398,240 | ) | $ | (234,452 | ) | $ | (1,752,887 | ) | $ | 34,675,018 |
* From April 3, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013.
(a) Net of $20,233 foreign taxes withheld
172 | See notes to financial statements | 173 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2013
TOTAL | EQUITY | GROWTH & | ||||||||||
RETURN | INCOME | INCOME | GLOBAL | |||||||||
Investment Income | ||||||||||||
Dividends | $ | 8,512,277 | (a) | $ | 12,940,753 | (b) | $ 32,389,180 | (c) | $ | 6,866,127 | (d) | |
Interest. | 7,995,304 | 14,995 | 9,141 | 2,738 | ||||||||
Total income | 16,507,581 | 12,955,748 | 32,398,321 | 6,868,865 | ||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | ||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 4,408,735 | 3,261,377 | 9,639,968 | 2,873,051 | ||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | 1,798,059 | 1,298,612 | 4,102,696 | 894,081 | ||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | 103,645 | 64,802 | 270,563 | 43,984 | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class A | 1,114,063 | 779,278 | 2,540,476 | 710,082 | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class B | 24,150 | 16,370 | 61,220 | 13,059 | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Advisor Class | 20 | 21 | 20 | 21 | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Institutional Class | 18 | 559 | 18 | 18 | ||||||||
Professional fees | 74,942 | 73,816 | 153,255 | 44,588 | ||||||||
Custodian fees | 28,951 | 18,041 | 43,860 | 175,180 | ||||||||
Registration fees | 83,297 | 75,944 | 88,076 | 69,948 | ||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 24,056 | 18,908 | 56,060 | 19,210 | ||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 32,957 | 23,762 | 75,170 | 16,583 | ||||||||
Other expenses | 82,063 | 51,184 | 144,972 | 90,527 | ||||||||
Total expenses | 7,774,956 | 5,682,674 | 17,176,354 | 4,950,332 | ||||||||
Less: Expenses waived and/or assumed | (37 | ) | (19 | ) | (37 | ) | (59,027 | ) | ||||
Expenses paid indirectly | (5,163 | ) | (3,848 | ) | (11,793 | ) | (352 | ) | ||||
Net expenses | 7,769,756 | 5,678,807 | 17,164,524 | 4,890,953 | ||||||||
Net investment income | 8,737,825 | 7,276,941 | 15,233,797 | 1,977,912 | ||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | ||||||||||||
and Foreign Currency Transactions (Note 2): | ||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | ||||||||||||
Investments | 15,481,867 | 22,666,688 | 49,811,355 | 28,942,003 | ||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | — | — | (58,033 | ) | |||||||
Net realized gain on investments and | ||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 15,481,867 | 22,666,688 | 49,811,355 | 28,883,970 | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and | ||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 54,506,102 | 46,472,134 | 245,762,325 | 20,625,048 | ||||||||
Net gain on investments and foreign currency transactions | 69,987,969 | 69,138,822 | 295,573,680 | 49,509,018 | ||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | 78,725,794 | $ | 76,415,763 | $ | 310,807,477 | $ | 51,486,930 |
(a) Net of $36,941 foreign taxes withheld.
(b) Net of $83,710 foreign taxes withheld.
(c) Net of $120,603 foreign taxes withheld.
(d) Net of $391,223 foreign taxes withheld.
174 | See notes to financial statements | 175 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2013
SELECT | SPECIAL | |||||||||||
GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | |||||||||
Investment Income | ||||||||||||
Dividends | $ | 4,697,501 | $ | 11,680,895 | (e) | $ | 6,813,995 | $ | 4,013,114 | (f) | ||
Interest | 572 | 11,293 | 12,469 | 3,799 | ||||||||
Total income | 4,698,073 | 11,692,188 | 6,826,464 | 4,016,913 | ||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | ||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 2,197,692 | 4,629,471 | 3,329,854 | 1,916,640 | ||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | 863,569 | 1,868,609 | 1,117,142 | 576,626 | ||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | 53,496 | 132,846 | 49,320 | 33,657 | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class A | 676,558 | 1,272,341 | 848,525 | 508,674 | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Class B | 15,431 | 32,263 | 13,506 | 10,803 | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Advisor Class | 21 | 20 | 20 | 21 | ||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs – Institutional Class | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | ||||||||
Professional fees | 39,720 | 75,384 | 46,201 | 29,703 | ||||||||
Custodian fees | 8,241 | 24,784 | 18,495 | 158,567 | ||||||||
Registration fees | 71,951 | 77,945 | 72,411 | 71,952 | ||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 16,443 | 29,025 | 19,474 | 11,511 | ||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 15,971 | 34,058 | 20,504 | 10,562 | ||||||||
Other expenses | 33,754 | 67,337 | 45,023 | 42,528 | ||||||||
Total expenses | 3,992,865 | 8,244,101 | 5,580,493 | 3,371,262 | ||||||||
Less: Expenses waived and/or assumed | (37 | ) | (37 | ) | (311,380 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||
Expenses paid indirectly | (329 | ) | (5,286 | ) | (430 | ) | (200 | ) | ||||
Net expenses | 3,992,499 | 8,238,778 | 5,268,683 | 3,371,025 | ||||||||
Net investment income. | 705,574 | 3,453,410 | 1,557,781 | 645,888 | ||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | ||||||||||||
and Foreign Currency Transactions (Note 2): | ||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | ||||||||||||
Investments | 37,621,367 | 49,631,929 | 78,785,374 | 6,677,207 | ||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | — | — | (135,870 | ) | |||||||
Net realized gain on investments | ||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 37,621,367 | 49,631,929 | 78,785,374 | 6,541,337 | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments and | ||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 5,639,836 | 134,682,038 | (9,595,192 | ) | 5,511,859 | |||||||
Net gain on investments and foreign currency transactions | 43,261,203 | 184,313,967 | 69,190,182 | 12,053,196 | ||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | 43,966,777 | $ | 187,767,377 | $ | 70,747,963 | $ | 12,699,084 |
(e) Net of $30,862 foreign taxes withheld.
(f) Net of $343,223 foreign taxes withheld.
176 | See notes to financial statements | 177 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
STRATEGIC | |||||||||||||||||||||
CASH MANAGEMENT | GOVERNMENT | INVESTMENT GRADE | INCOME | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | ** | |||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5,897,172 | $ | 8,431,847 | $ | 17,781,707 | $ | 17,238,565 | $ | 344,830 | |||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and futures contracts | — | — | (2,524,401 | ) | 2,747,134 | 6,707,102 | 6,126,339 | 20,787 | |||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | — | — | (12,376,919 | ) | (1,091,454 | ) | (30,887,049 | ) | 29,262,123 | (600,069 | ) | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | — | — | (9,004,148 | ) | 10,087,527 | (6,398,240 | ) | 52,627,027 | (234,452 | ) | |||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | — | — | (10,605,675 | ) | (11,975,470 | ) | (20,739,540 | ) | (19,773,424 | ) | (321,799 | ) | |||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | — | — | (119,679 | ) | (180,107 | ) | (222,878 | ) | (300,972 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | N/A | N/A | (13 | ) | N/A | (19 | ) | N/A | (15 | ) | |||||||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | — | N/A | (29,051 | ) | N/A | (110,770 | ) | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Total dividends | — | — | (10,754,418 | ) | (12,155,577 | ) | (21,073,207 | ) | (20,074,396 | ) | (321,814 | ) | |||||||||
Share Transactions * | |||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 170,296,304 | 138,654,875 | 71,815,747 | 80,703,297 | 133,038,106 | 110,514,618 | 48,792,921 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | — | 9,909,442 | 11,116,817 | 19,197,738 | 18,092,318 | 309,020 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (175,051,743 | ) | (151,798,288 | ) | (89,063,124 | ) | (54,554,693 | ) | (113,252,520 | ) | (65,812,986 | ) | (1,201,230 | ) | |||||||
(4,755,439 | ) | (13,143,413 | ) | (7,337,935 | ) | 37,265,421 | 38,983,324 | 62,793,950 | 47,900,711 | ||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 593,663 | 256,141 | 451,982 | 1,106,976 | 746,634 | 995,491 | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | — | 113,260 | 170,501 | 213,612 | 286,900 | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (918,318 | ) | (879,445 | ) | (1,952,936 | ) | (2,129,656 | ) | (2,498,053 | ) | (3,767,140 | ) | N/A | ||||||||
(324,655 | ) | (623,304 | ) | (1,387,694 | ) | (852,179 | ) | (1,537,807 | ) | (2,484,749 | ) | N/A | |||||||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | N/A | N/A | 14 | N/A | 19 | N/A | 15 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | ||||||||||||||
N/A | N/A | 1,014 | N/A | 1,019 | N/A | 1,015 | |||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 1,000 | N/A | 4,663,814 | N/A | 11,445,833 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | N/A | 20 | N/A | 20 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | (1,909,933 | ) | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||
1,000 | N/A | 4,663,834 | N/A | 9,535,920 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from share transactions | (5,079,094 | ) | (13,766,717 | ) | (4,060,781 | ) | 36,413,242 | 46,982,456 | 60,309,201 | 47,901,726 | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | (5,079,094 | ) | (13,766,717 | ) | (23,819,347 | ) | 34,345,192 | 19,511,009 | 92,861,832 | 47,345,460 | |||||||||||
Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 135,923,313 | 149,690,030 | 388,457,102 | 354,111,910 | 539,931,779 | 447,069,947 | — | ||||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 130,844,219 | $ | 135,923,313 | $ | 364,637,755 | $ | 388,457,102 | $ | 559,442,788 | $ | 539,931,779 | $ | 47,345,460 | |||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 55,298 | $ | 47,140 | $ | (6,419,736 | ) | $ | (3,993,608 | ) | $ | 23,016 |
** From April 3, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013.
178 | See notes to financial statements | 179 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
STRATEGIC | |||||||||||||||
CASH MANAGEMENT | GOVERNMENT | INVESTMENT GRADE | INCOME | ||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | ** | |||||||
*Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||
Sold | 170,296,304 | 138,654,875 | 6,400,413 | 6,982,798 | 13,140,993 | 11,192,864 | 4,931,628 | ||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | — | 885,161 | 961,810 | 1,903,029 | 1,825,614 | 31,663 | ||||||||
Redeemed | (175,051,743 | ) | (151,798,288 | ) | (7,966,458 | ) | (4,720,673 | ) | (11,224,653 | ) | (6,656,099 | ) | (122,993 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | (4,755,439 | ) | (13,143,413 | ) | (680,884 | ) | 3,223,935 | 3,819,369 | 6,362,379 | 4,840,298 | |||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||
Sold | 593,663 | 256,141 | 40,139 | 95,856 | 73,648 | 100,837 | N/A | ||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | — | 10,117 | 14,766 | 21,171 | 29,041 | N/A | ||||||||
Redeemed | (918,318 | ) | (879,445 | ) | (173,828 | ) | (184,393 | ) | (246,564 | ) | (383,906 | ) | N/A | ||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | (324,655 | ) | (623,304 | ) | (123,572 | ) | (73,771 | ) | (151,745 | ) | (254,028 | ) | N/A | ||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||
Sold | N/A | N/A | 89 | N/A | 98 | N/A | 100 | ||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | N/A | N/A | 1 | N/A | 2 | N/A | 2 | ||||||||
Redeemed | N/A | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | ||||||||
Net increase in Advisor Class shares outstanding | N/A | N/A | 90 | N/A | 100 | N/A | 102 | ||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||
Sold | 1,000 | N/A | 424,709 | N/A | 1,148,312 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | N/A | 2 | N/A | 2 | N/A | N/A | ||||||||
Redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | (196,092 | ) | N/A | N/A | |||||||
Net increase in Institutional Class shares outstanding | 1,000 | N/A | 424,711 | N/A | 952,222 | N/A | N/A |
**From April 3, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013.
180 | See notes to financial statements | 181 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
INTERNATIONAL | FUND FOR | |||||||||||
OPPORTUNITIES BOND | INCOME | |||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2013 | 2012 | ** | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | ||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 443,170 | $ | 19,972 | $ | 33,007,680 | $ | 34,058,067 | ||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and | ||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 1,307,814 | (1,473 | ) | 17,247,717 | 8,841,108 | |||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments and | ||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | (3,503,871 | ) | 375,445 | (15,580,379 | ) | 49,079,702 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | ||||||||||||
from operations | (1,752,887 | ) | 393,944 | 34,675,018 | 91,978,877 | |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | ||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | (2,062,847 | ) | (24,887 | ) | (36,486,900 | ) | (35,292,367 | ) | ||||
Net investment income – Class B | N/A | N/A | (268,095 | ) | (372,652 | ) | ||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | (15 | ) | N/A | (29 | ) | N/A | ||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | (59,034 | ) | N/A | (276,219 | ) | N/A | ||||||
Net realized gains – Class A | (64,140 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||
Net realized gains – Class B | N/A | N/A | — | — | ||||||||
Net realized gains – Advisor Class | — | N/A | — | N/A | ||||||||
Net realized gains – Institutional Class | — | N/A | — | N/A | ||||||||
Total distributions | (2,186,036 | ) | (24,887 | ) | (37,031,243 | ) | (35,665,019 | ) | ||||
Share Transactions* | ||||||||||||
Class A: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 88,008,741 | 23,507,430 | 109,644,866 | 75,841,881 | ||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 2,062,264 | 23,798 | 31,001,180 | 29,568,927 | ||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (6,702,089 | ) | (4,336,791 | ) | (93,323,531 | ) | (63,479,906 | ) | ||||
83,368,916 | 19,194,437 | 47,322,515 | 41,930,902 | |||||||||
Class B: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | N/A | N/A | 933,907 | 607,441 | ||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | N/A | N/A | 214,951 | 313,420 | ||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | N/A | N/A | (1,797,374 | ) | (3,555,468 | ) | ||||||
N/A | N/A | (648,516 | ) | (2,634,607 | ) | |||||||
Advisor Class: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | ||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | 15 | N/A | 29 | N/A | ||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | ||||||||
1,015 | N/A | 1,029 | N/A | |||||||||
Institutional Class: | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 9,541,985 | N/A | 18,832,421 | N/A | ||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | 15 | N/A | 30 | N/A | ||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (2,376,040 | ) | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||
7,165,960 | N/A | 18,832,451 | N/A | |||||||||
Net increase from share transactions | 90,535,891 | 19,194,437 | 65,507,479 | 39,296,295 | ||||||||
Net increase in net assets | 86,596,968 | 19,563,494 | 63,151,254 | 95,610,153 | ||||||||
Net Assets | ||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 19,563,494 | — | 608,028,802 | 512,418,649 | ||||||||
End of year† | $ | 106,160,462 | $ | 19,563,494 | $ | 671,180,056 | $ | 608,028,802 | ||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | 62,663 | $ | (4,166 | ) | $ | (2,865,084 | ) | $ | (1,100,372 | ) |
** From August 20, 2012 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2012.
182 | See notes to financial statements | 183 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
INTERNATIONAL | FUND FOR | ||||||||
OPPORTUNITIES BOND | INCOME | ||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2013 | 2012 | ** | 2013 | 2012 | ||||
* Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||
Sold | 8,628,619 | 2,339,380 | 41,692,426 | 30,109,659 | |||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 205,187 | 2,329 | 11,809,665 | 11,711,571 | |||||
Redeemed | (669,057 | ) | (427,909 | ) | (35,531,467 | ) | (25,241,060 | ) | |
Net increase in Class A shares outstanding | 8,164,749 | 1,913,800 | 17,970,624 | 16,580,170 | |||||
Class B: | |||||||||
Sold | N/A | N/A | 354,898 | 241,388 | |||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | N/A | N/A | 81,867 | 124,477 | |||||
Redeemed | N/A | N/A | (683,943 | ) | (1,418,398 | ) | |||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | N/A | N/A | (247,178 | ) | (1,052,533 | ) | |||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||
Sold | 98 | N/A | 376 | N/A | |||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | 1 | N/A | 11 | N/A | |||||
Redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||
Net increase in Advisor Class shares outstanding | 99 | N/A | 387 | N/A | |||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||
Sold | 948,832 | N/A | 7,144,978 | N/A | |||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | 1 | N/A | 11 | N/A | |||||
Redeemed | (238,498 | ) | N/A | — | N/A | ||||
Net increase in Institutional Class shares outstanding | 710,335 | N/A | 7,144,989 | N/A |
**From August 20, 2012 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2012.
184 | See notes to financial statements | 185 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
TOTAL RETURN | EQUITY INCOME | GROWTH & INCOME | GLOBAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 8,737,825 | $ | 8,427,411 | $ | 7,276,941 | $ | 6,560,611 | $ | 15,233,797 | $ | 14,690,454 | $ | 1,977,912 | $ | 1,199,577 | |||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 15,481,867 | 9,889,479 | 22,666,688 | (1,363,199 | ) | 49,811,355 | 25,391,281 | 28,883,970 | (1,867,392 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation of investments and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 54,506,102 | 69,162,630 | 46,472,134 | 76,643,044 | 245,762,325 | 221,517,657 | 20,625,048 | 56,227,236 | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 78,725,794 | 87,479,520 | 76,415,763 | 81,840,456 | 310,807,477 | 261,599,392 | 51,486,930 | 55,559,421 | |||||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | (11,460,204 | ) | (8,802,366 | ) | (7,018,270 | ) | (4,992,799 | ) | (16,526,451 | ) | (9,050,725 | ) | (1,424,622 | ) | (682,596 | ) | |||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | (129,605 | ) | (137,606 | ) | (60,686 | ) | (47,943 | ) | (183,967 | ) | (78,713 | ) | (18,090 | ) | (6,148 | ) | |||||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | (9 | ) | N/A | (8 | ) | N/A | (4 | ) | N/A | — | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | (10 | ) | N/A | (21,919 | ) | N/A | (5 | ) | N/A | — | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class A | (7,978,527 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class B | (154,041 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Advisor Class | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Institutional Class | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions | (19,722,396 | ) | (8,939,972 | ) | (7,100,883 | ) | (5,040,742 | ) | (16,710,427 | ) | (9,129,438 | ) | (1,442,712 | ) | (688,744 | ) | |||||||||
Share Transactions * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 151,808,639 | 120,347,723 | 80,787,524 | 49,928,915 | 225,005,030 | 132,897,199 | 26,527,993 | 27,171,178 | |||||||||||||||||
Value of shares issued for acquisition** | — | — | — | — | — | 364,273,402 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions. | 19,242,664 | 8,680,216 | 6,932,698 | 4,929,086 | 16,393,701 | 8,979,608 | 1,405,678 | 673,450 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (96,571,663 | ) | (58,568,275 | ) | (72,530,693 | ) | (55,551,297 | ) | (216,966,800 | ) | (151,874,850 | ) | (43,281,094 | ) | (39,969,343 | ) | |||||||||
74,479,640 | 70,459,664 | 15,189,529 | (693,296 | ) | 24,431,931 | 354,275,359 | (15,347,423 | ) | (12,124,715 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 1,802,068 | 1,403,987 | 633,835 | 448,256 | 2,358,307 | 2,527,142 | 326,341 | 403,551 | |||||||||||||||||
Value of shares issued for acquisition** | — | — | — | — | — | 9,713,143 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions. | 283,547 | 137,125 | 60,686 | 47,905 | 183,800 | 78,581 | 18,090 | 6,147 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (3,729,618 | ) | (5,798,871 | ) | (2,314,718 | ) | (3,159,724 | ) | (7,717,456 | ) | (11,271,586 | ) | (1,008,810 | ) | (1,449,049 | ) | |||||||||
(1,644,003 | ) | (4,257,759 | ) | (1,620,197 | ) | (2,663,563 | ) | (5,175,349 | ) | 1,047,280 | (664,379 | ) | (1,039,351 | ) | |||||||||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | 9 | N/A | 8 | N/A | 4 | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
1,009 | N/A | 1,008 | N/A | 1,004 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 1,000 | N/A | 4,650,735 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | 10 | N/A | 6 | N/A | 5 | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
1,010 | N/A | 4,650,741 | N/A | 1,005 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from share transactions | 72,837,656 | 66,201,905 | 18,221,081 | (3,356,859 | ) | 19,258,591 | 355,322,639 | (16,009,802 | ) | (13,164,066 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets | 131,841,054 | 144,741,453 | 87,535,961 | 73,442,855 | 313,355,641 | 607,792,593 | 34,034,416 | 41,706,611 | |||||||||||||||||
Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 542,422,198 | 397,680,745 | 398,940,761 | 325,497,906 | 1,252,990,101 | 645,197,508 | 287,716,243 | 246,009,632 | |||||||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 674,263,252 | $ | 542,422,198 | $ | 486,476,722 | $ | 398,940,761 | $ | 1,566,345,742 | $ | 1,252,990,101 | $ | 321,750,659 | $ | 287,716,243 | |||||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | (2,274,431 | ) | $ | (361,113 | ) | $ | 2,668,541 | $ | 2,492,483 | $ | 5,564,922 | $ | 7,041,552 | $ | 1,142,588 | $ | 662,542 |
**See Note 11
186 | See notes to financial statements | 187 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
TOTAL RETURN | EQUITY INCOME | GROWTH & INCOME | GLOBAL | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
*Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 8,646,376 | 7,481,618 | 9,628,589 | 6,889,242 | 12,146,401 | 8,594,359 | 3,616,109 | 4,270,231 | |||||||||
Issued for acquisition** | — | — | — | — | — | 25,233,878 | — | — | |||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 1,125,446 | 538,948 | 834,640 | 665,487 | 930,022 | 583,170 | 202,547 | 112,055 | |||||||||
Redeemed | (5,485,124 | ) | (3,674,671 | ) | (8,689,334 | ) | (7,653,713 | ) | (11,774,440 | ) | (9,780,526 | ) | (5,920,135 | ) | (6,246,526 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | 4,286,698 | 4,345,895 | 1,773,895 | (98,984 | ) | 1,301,983 | 24,630,881 | (2,101,479 | ) | (1,864,240 | ) | ||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 104,561 | 89,506 | 75,670 | 63,260 | 135,778 | 174,925 | 51,787 | 72,915 | |||||||||
Issued for acquisition** | — | — | — | — | — | 715,868 | — | — | |||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 17,051 | 8,728 | 7,547 | 6,579 | 11,774 | 5,836 | 3,025 | 1,180 | |||||||||
Redeemed | (217,312 | ) | (374,806 | ) | (285,676 | ) | (452,496 | ) | (451,729 | ) | (785,200 | ) | (159,896 | ) | (264,395 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares outstanding | (95,700 | ) | (276,572 | ) | (202,459 | ) | (382,657 | ) | (304,177 | ) | 111,429 | (105,084 | ) | (190,300 | ) | ||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 56 | N/A | 119 | N/A | 54 | N/A | 137 | N/A | |||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | 1 | N/A | 1 | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||
Redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||
Net increase in Advisor Class shares outstanding | 57 | N/A | 120 | N/A | 54 | N/A | 137 | N/A | |||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 56 | N/A | 523,137 | N/A | 54 | N/A | 137 | N/A | |||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | 1 | N/A | 1 | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||
Redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||
Net increase in Institutional Class shares outstanding | 57 | N/A | 523,138 | N/A | 54 | N/A | 137 | N/A |
**See Note 11
188 | See notes to financial statements | 189 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
SELECT GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SPECIAL SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 705,574 | $ | (944,001 | ) | $ | 3,453,410 | $ | 4,684,227 | $ | 1,557,781 | $ | 59,936 | $ | 645,888 | $ | 1,276,176 | ||||||||
Net realized gain on investments and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
foreign currency transactions | 37,621,367 | 6,874,740 | 49,631,929 | 14,703,906 | 78,785,374 | 8,831,864 | 6,541,337 | 11,215,665 | |||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 5,639,836 | 50,284,387 | 134,682,038 | 96,340,656 | (9,595,192 | ) | 52,595,947 | 5,511,859 | 19,972,563 | ||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 43,966,777 | 56,215,126 | 187,767,377 | 115,728,789 | 70,747,963 | 61,487,747 | 12,699,084 | 32,464,404 | |||||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | — | — | (4,707,638 | ) | (2,858,976 | ) | (1,635,146 | ) | (387,088 | ) | — | (2,142,019 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | — | — | (106,969 | ) | (81,714 | ) | (19,139 | ) | — | — | (43,360 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net investment income – Advisor Class | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Institutional Class | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class A | — | — | (14,500,437 | ) | (15,298,237 | ) | (14,034,907 | ) | (22,980,160 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class B | — | — | (394,685 | ) | (575,152 | ) | (232,335 | ) | (499,531 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Advisor Class | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Institutional Class | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Total distributions | — | — | (19,709,729 | ) | (18,814,079 | ) | (15,921,527 | ) | (23,866,779 | ) | — | (2,185,379 | ) | ||||||||||||
Share Transactions * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 49,260,112 | 45,428,727 | 109,567,095 | 71,370,721 | 55,016,522 | 43,391,077 | 65,131,798 | 27,195,451 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions. | — | — | 19,127,611 | 18,082,699 | 15,590,531 | 23,250,649 | — | 2,131,981 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (47,680,903 | ) | (32,353,171 | ) | (96,351,212 | ) | (69,018,854 | ) | (55,639,919 | ) | (45,918,661 | ) | (27,541,316 | ) | (21,671,006 | ) | |||||||||
1,579,209 | 13,075,556 | 32,343,494 | 20,434,566 | 14,967,134 | 20,723,065 | 37,590,482 | 7,656,426 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 374,300 | 466,306 | 1,226,999 | 1,148,482 | 350,983 | 592,309 | 262,698 | 212,184 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions. | — | — | 500,972 | 655,289 | 251,359 | 499,190 | — | 43,332 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (1,650,653 | ) | (2,820,737 | ) | (4,525,679 | ) | (6,554,117 | ) | (1,385,228 | ) | (2,515,486 | ) | (604,520 | ) | (528,475 | ) | |||||||||
(1,276,353 | ) | (2,354,431 | ) | (2,797,708 | ) | (4,750,346 | ) | (782,886 | ) | (1,423,987 | ) | (341,822 | ) | (272,959 | ) | ||||||||||
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||||||||||
1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | 1,000 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
Net increase from share transactions | 304,856 | 10,721,125 | 29,547,786 | 15,684,220 | 14,186,248 | 19,299,078 | 37,250,660 | 7,383,467 | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets | 44,271,633 | 66,936,251 | 197,605,434 | 112,598,930 | 69,012,684 | 56,920,046 | 49,949,744 | 37,662,492 | |||||||||||||||||
Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 276,872,095 | 209,935,844 | 543,015,425 | 430,416,495 | 348,023,789 | 291,103,743 | 169,125,287 | 131,462,795 | |||||||||||||||||
End of year†. | $ | 321,143,728 | $ | 276,872,095 | $ | 740,620,859 | $ | 543,015,425 | $ | 417,036,473 | $ | 348,023,789 | $ | 219,075,031 | $ | 169,125,287 | |||||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | 46,929 | $ | (658,645 | ) | $ | 3,100,350 | $ | 4,684,129 | $ | — | $ | 59,929 | $ | 318,164 | $ | (191,854 | ) |
190 | See notes to financial statements | 191 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
SELECT GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SPECIAL SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||
*Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 5,861,743 | 6,092,740 | 3,285,077 | 2,548,556 | 2,140,339 | 1,789,639 | 5,267,583 | 2,533,422 | |||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | — | — | 645,331 | 698,983 | 658,662 | 1,025,613 | — | 211,506 | |||||||||
Redeemed | (5,668,289 | ) | (4,326,019 | ) | (2,908,153 | ) | (2,461,213 | ) | (2,174,522 | ) | (1,890,583 | ) | (2,228,081 | ) | (2,016,988 | ) | |
Net increase in Class A shares outstanding | 193,454 | 1,766,721 | 1,022,255 | 786,326 | 624,479 | 924,669 | 3,039,502 | 727,940 | |||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 49,006 | 69,714 | 43,411 | 47,887 | 16,135 | 28,575 | 22,103 | 20,483 | |||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | — | — | 19,864 | 29,425 | 12,644 | 25,851 | — | 4,440 | |||||||||
Redeemed | (219,786 | ) | (421,243 | ) | (161,529 | ) | (275,737 | ) | (64,381 | ) | (122,401 | ) | (50,706 | ) | (51,884 | ) | |
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | (170,780 | ) | (351,529 | ) | (98,254 | ) | (198,425 | ) | (35,602 | ) | (67,975 | ) | (28,603 | ) | (26,961 | ) | |
Advisor Class: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 118 | N/A | 30 | N/A | 39 | N/A | 78 | N/A | |||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||
Redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||
Net increase in Advisor Class shares outstanding | 118 | N/A | 30 | N/A | 39 | N/A | 78 | N/A | |||||||||
Institutional Class: | |||||||||||||||||
Sold | 118 | N/A | 30 | N/A | 39 | N/A | 78 | N/A | |||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||
Redeemed | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | — | N/A | |||||||||
Net increase in Institutional Class shares outstanding | 118 | N/A | 30 | N/A | 39 | N/A | 78 | N/A |
192 | See notes to financial statements | 193 |
Notes to Financial Statements
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
1. Significant Accounting Policies—First Investors Income Funds (“Income Funds”) and First Investors Equity Funds (“Equity Funds”), each a Delaware statutory trust (each a “Trust”, collectively, “the Trusts”), are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) as open-end management investment companies and operate as series funds. The Income Funds issue shares of beneficial interest in the Cash Management Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Strategic Income Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund and Fund For Income. The Equity Funds issue shares of beneficial interest in the Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund (formerly Value Fund), Growth & Income Fund, Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund and International Fund (each a “Fund”, collectively, “the Funds”). The Trusts account separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each Fund. The objective of each Fund as of September 30, 2013, is as follows:
Cash Management Fund seeks to earn a high rate of current income consistent with the preservation of capital and maintenance of liquidity.
Government Fund seeks to achieve a significant level of current income which is consistent with security and liquidity of principal.
Investment Grade Fund seeks to generate a maximum level of income consistent with investment in investment grade debt securities.
Strategic Income Fund seeks a high level of current income.
International Opportunities Bond Fund seeks total return consisting of income and capital appreciation.
Fund For Income seeks high current income.
Total Return Fund seeks high, long-term total investment return consistent with moderate investment risk.
Equity Income Fund seeks total return.
Growth & Income Fund seeks long-term growth of capital and current income.
Global Fund seeks long-term capital growth.
Select Growth Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Opportunity Fund seeks long-term capital growth.
Special Situations Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
International Fund primarily seeks long-term capital growth.
194 |
A. Security Valuation—Except as provided below, a security listed or traded on an exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market is valued at its last sale price on the exchange or market where the security is principally traded, and lacking any sales, the security is valued at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices. Securities traded in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market (including securities listed on exchanges whose primary market is believed to be OTC) are valued at the mean between the last bid and asked prices based on quotes furnished by a market maker for such securities. Securities may also be priced by pricing services approved by the Trusts’ Board of Trustees (the “Board”). The pricing services consider security type, rating, market condition and yield data as well as market quotations, prices provided by market makers and other available information in determining value. Short-term debt securities that mature in 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost. The net asset value of the Strategic Income Fund is derived from the net asset values of the underlying Funds in which it invests.
The Funds monitor for significant events occurring prior to the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange that could have a material impact on the value of any securities that are held by the Funds. Examples of such events include trading halts, natural disasters, political events and issuer-specific developments. If the Valuation Committee of First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”) decides that such events warrant using fair value estimates, it will take such events into consideration in determining the fair values of such securities. If market quotations or prices are not readily available or determined to be unreliable, the securities will be valued at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to procedures adopted by the Board. The Funds also use a pricing service to fair value foreign equity securities in the event that fluctuation in U.S. securities markets exceed a predetermined level or if a foreign market is closed. For valuation purposes, where applicable, quotations of foreign securities in foreign currency are translated to U.S. dollar equivalents using the foreign exchange quotation in effect. As of September 30, 2013, Fund For Income held three securities that were fair valued by FIMCO’s Valuation Committee with an aggregate value of $3,785, representing 0% of the Fund’s net assets.
The Cash Management Fund values its portfolio securities in accordance with the amortized cost method of valuation under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act. Amortized cost is an approximation of market value of an instrument, whereby the difference between its acquisition cost and market value at maturity is amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the instrument. The effect of changes in the market value of a security as a result of fluctuating interest rates is not taken into account and thus the amortized cost method of valuation may result in the value of a security being higher or lower than its actual market value.
195 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), investments held by the Funds are carried at “fair value”. As defined by ASC 820, fair value is the price that a fund would receive upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market for the investment under current market conditions. Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s investments.
In addition to defining fair value, ASC 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical securities that the Fund has the ability to access.
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund's own assumption about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available.
Equity securities traded on an exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy to the extent that they are actively traded and valuation adjustments are not applied. The underlying funds in which Strategic Income Fund invests in are also categorized in Level 1. Foreign securities that are fair valued in the event that fluctuations in U.S. securities markets exceed a predetermined level or if a foreign market is closed are categorized in Level 2. Corporate, sovereign and municipal bonds, asset backed, U.S. Government and U.S. Government Agency securities and loan participations are categorized in Level 2 to the extent that the inputs are observable and timely, otherwise they would be categorized as Level 3. Short-term notes that are valued at amortized cost are categorized in Level 2. Foreign exchange contracts that are considered derivative instruments and are valued at the net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on the instruments are categorized in Level 2. Restricted securities and securities that are fair valued by the Valuation Committee may be categorized in either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy depending on the relative significance of valuation inputs.
196 |
The aggregate value by input level, as of September 30, 2013, for each Fund’s investments is included at the end of each Fund’s portfolio of investments.
B. Federal Income Taxes—No provision has been made for federal income taxes on net income or capital gains since it is the policy of each Fund to continue to comply with the special provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to investment companies, and to make sufficient distributions of income and capital gains (in excess of any available capital loss carryovers) to relieve it from all, or substantially all, such taxes. At September 30, 2013, capital loss carryovers were as follows:
Capital Loss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carryovers Not Subject | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Capital Loss Carryovers Expire | to Expiration | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long | Short | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Total | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | Term | Term | |||||||||||||||||||
Government | $ | 7,061,305 | $ | 646,760 | $ | 1,909,473 | $ | 1,063,550 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 40,595 | $ | — | $ | 3,400,927 | ||||||||||
Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grade | 13,584,806 | — | — | — | 13,584,806 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Fund For | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income | 166,931,606 | 2,665,632 | 24,660,250 | 5,033,118 | 23,949,720 | 110,622,886 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Select Growth | 31,245,713 | — | — | — | — | 31,245,713 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
International | 26,152,463 | — | — | — | 3,055,947 | 20,905,274 | 2,191,242 | — | — |
As a result of the passage of the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (“the Modernization Act of 2010”), losses incurred in fiscal year 2010 and beyond retain their character as short-term or long-term, have no expiration date and are utilized prior to capital loss carryovers occurring prior to the enactment of the Modernization Act of 2010.
The Funds recognize the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Funds’ tax positions and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years 2010 – 2012, or expected to be taken in the Funds’ 2013 tax returns. The Funds identify their major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal, New York State, New York City and foreign jurisdictions where the Funds make significant investments; however, the Funds are not aware of any tax position for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next twelve months.
197 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
C. Distributions to Shareholders—Dividends from net investment income of the Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Strategic Income Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund and Fund For Income are generally declared daily and paid monthly. The Cash Management Fund declares distributions, if any, daily and pays distributions monthly. Distributions are declared from the total of net investment income plus or minus all realized short-term gains and losses on investments. Dividends from net investment income, if any, of Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund and Growth & Income Fund are declared and paid quarterly. Dividends from net investment income, if any, of Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund and International Fund are declared and paid annually. Distributions from net realized capital gains, if any, of each of the Funds are normally declared and paid annually. Income dividends and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences are primarily due to differing treatments for capital loss carryforwards, deferral of wash sales losses, post-October capital losses, late loss deferrals, net operating losses and foreign currency transactions.
D. Expense Allocation—Expenses directly charged or attributable to a Fund are paid from the assets of that Fund. General expenses of the Trusts are allocated among and charged to the assets of each Fund on a fair and equitable basis, which may be based on the relative assets of each Fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each Fund.
E. Use of Estimates—The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
F. Foreign Currency Translations—The accounting records of International Opportunities Bond Fund, Global Fund and International Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Portfolio securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend income and certain expenses are translated to U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions.
198 |
International Opportunities Bond Fund, Global Fund and International Fund do not isolate that portion of gains and losses on investments which is due to changes in foreign exchange rates from that which is due to changes in market prices of the investments. These changes are included with the net realized and unrealized gains and losses from investments.
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions include gains and losses from the sales of foreign currency and gains and losses on accrued foreign dividends and related withholding taxes.
G. Other—Security transactions are generally accounted for on the first business day following the date the securities are purchased or sold, except for financial reporting purposes, which is trade date. Investments in securities issued on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis are generally reflected in the assets of the Funds on the first business day following the date the securities are purchased and the Funds segregate assets for these transactions. Cost of securities is determined and gains and losses are based on the identified cost basis for both financial statement and federal income tax purposes. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or for certain foreign dividends, as soon as the Fund becomes aware of the dividends. Interest income and estimated expenses are accrued daily. Bond discounts and premiums are accreted or amortized using the interest method. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends have been provided in accordance with the Funds’ understanding of the applicable country’s tax rules and rates. The Bank of New York Mellon, custodian for the Cash Management Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund and Fund For Income, may provide credits against custodian charges based on uninvested cash balance of the Funds. For the year ended September 30, 2013, the Bank of New York Mellon provided credits in the amount of $14. Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. serves as custodian for the Strategic Income Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, and each Fund in the Equity Funds. Certain of the Funds reduced expenses through brokerage service arrangements. For the year ended September 30, 2013, expenses were reduced by a total of $2,167 for the Income Funds and by a total of $27,401 for the Equity Funds.
199 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
2. Security Transactions—For the year ended September 30, 2013, purchases and sales of securities and long-term U.S. Government obligations (excluding U.S. Treasury bills, short-term securities and foreign currencies) were as follows:
Long-Term U.S. | |||||||||
Securities | Government Obligations | ||||||||
Cost of | Proceeds | Cost of | Proceeds | ||||||
Fund | Purchases | of Sales | Purchases | of Sales | |||||
Government | $297,794,213 | $363,525,028 | $84,201,388 | $16,191,998 | |||||
Investment Grade | 223,807,904 | 177,958,296 | — | — | |||||
Strategic Income | 49,129,794 | 4,285,973 | — | — | |||||
International Opportunities Bond | 113,192,367 | 31,700,819 | — | — | |||||
Fund For Income | 440,507,596 | 371,401,421 | — | — | |||||
Total Return | 226,884,214 | 179,770,324 | 12,004,422 | 5,146,030 | |||||
Equity Income | 138,776,582 | 131,382,023 | — | — | |||||
Growth & Income | 277,340,681 | 275,398,590 | — | — | |||||
Global | 271,475,560 | 285,572,099 | — | — | |||||
Select Growth | 205,003,557 | 205,457,472 | — | — | |||||
Opportunity | 243,671,255 | 247,602,387 | — | — | |||||
Special Situations | 395,365,443 | 394,661,852 | — | — | |||||
International | 91,276,371 | 57,412,343 | — | — |
At September 30, 2013, aggregate cost and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of securities for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Gross | Gross | Unrealized | ||||||||||||
Aggregate | Unrealized | Unrealized | Appreciation | |||||||||||
Fund | Cost | Appreciation | Depreciation | (Depreciation | ) | |||||||||
Government | $ | 363,369,181 | $ | 8,909,111 | $ | 3,505,670 | $ | 5,403,441 | ||||||
Investment Grade | 530,564,354 | 25,003,450 | 6,843,751 | 18,159,699 | ||||||||||
Strategic Income | 44,866,551 | 67,887 | 669,899 | (602,012 | ) | |||||||||
International | ||||||||||||||
Opportunities Bond | 104,199,183 | 1,609,609 | 4,544,635 | (2,935,026 | ) | |||||||||
Fund For Income | 649,412,817 | 17,680,843 | 11,858,486 | 5,822,357 | ||||||||||
Total Return | 529,227,004 | 156,045,256 | 5,174,604 | 150,870,652 | ||||||||||
Equity Income | 370,610,711 | 117,925,482 | 2,089,670 | 115,835,812 | ||||||||||
Growth & Income | 1,025,658,603 | 555,027,249 | 10,710,905 | 544,316,344 | ||||||||||
Global | 249,753,000 | 69,949,133 | 1,948,508 | 68,000,625 | ||||||||||
Select Growth | 240,861,344 | 82,678,273 | 3,034,880 | 79,643,393 | ||||||||||
Opportunity | 472,147,506 | 269,370,785 | 1,542,607 | 267,828,178 | ||||||||||
Special Situations | 346,661,050 | 65,296,244 | 8,859,134 | 56,437,110 | ||||||||||
International | 172,913,182 | 51,354,668 | 6,534,468 | 44,820,200 |
200 |
The Strategic Income Fund may invest in the Institutional Class of Cash Management Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Fund For Income and Equity Income Fund. During the year ended September 30, 2013, purchases, sales and dividend income earned by Strategic Income Fund from investments in the Institutional Classes of the Funds were as follows:
Balance of | Balance of | Realized Gain | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares Held | Purchases/ | Sales/ | Shares Held | Value | Dividend | on Security | ||||||||||||||||
Fund | 9/30/2012 | Additions | Reductions | 9/30/2013 | 9/30/2013 | Income | Transactions | |||||||||||||||
Government | — | 424,622 | — | 424,622 | $ | 4,653,852 | $ | 29,024 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Investment Grade | — | 1,148,214 | (196,092 | ) | 952,122 | 9,321,277 | 110,750 | 3,158 | ||||||||||||||
International | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Opportunities Bond | — | 948,734 | (238,498 | ) | 710,236 | 6,995,824 | 59,019 | 17,629 | ||||||||||||||
Fund For Income | — | 7,144,602 | — | 7,144,602 | 18,575,964 | 276,190 | — | |||||||||||||||
Equity Income | — | 523,018 | — | 523,018 | 4,717,622 | 21,913 | — | |||||||||||||||
— | 10,189,190 | (434,590 | ) | 9,754,600 | $ | 44,264,539 | $ | 496,896 | $ | 20,787 |
3. Advisory Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates—Certain officers of the Trusts are officers of the Trusts’ investment adviser, FIMCO, their underwriter, First Investors Corporation (“FIC”) and their transfer agent, Administrative Data Management Corp. (“ADM”). Trustees of the Trusts who are not officers or directors of FIMCO or its affiliates are remunerated by the Funds. For the year ended September 30, 2013, total trustees fees accrued by the Income Funds and Equity Funds amounted to $98,492 and $229,567, respectively.
The Investment Advisory Agreements provide as compensation to FIMCO for each Fund, an annual fee, payable monthly, at the following rates:
Cash Management Fund—.50% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended September 30, 2013, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $472,473 in advisory fees to limit the Fund’s overall expense ratio to .60% on Class A shares, 1.35% on Class B shares and .60% on Institutional Class shares. Also, FIMCO has voluntarily waived an additional $217,275 in advisory fees and assumed $457,985 of other Fund expenses to prevent a negative yield on the Fund’s shares.
Government and Investment Grade Funds—.66% on the first $500 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. For the periods October 1, 2012 through May 31, 2013 and June 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $440,946 in advisory fees to limit the advisory fee to .55% and .53%, respectively of Government Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended September 30, 2013, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $603,619 in advisory fees on Investment Grade Fund to limit the advisory fee to .55% of its average daily net assets.
201 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
Strategic Income Fund—.05% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended September 30, 2013, FIMCO has waived, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement, $5,882 in advisory fees and assumed $89,546 in other expenses to limit the Fund’s overall expense ratio (exclusive of certain expenses) to 1.30% and 1.00% on Class A shares and Advisor Class shares, respectively.
International Opportunities Bond Fund and Fund For Income—.75% on the first $250 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, .72% on the next $250 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $2.25 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2013, FIMCO has waived, pursuant to an expense limitation agreement, $368,364 in advisory fees to limit the International Opportunity Bond Fund’s overall expense ratio to 1.30% (exclusive of certain expenses) on Class A shares. For the year ended September 30, 2013, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $161,079 in advisory fees on Fund For Income to limit the advisory fee to .70% of its average daily net assets.
Total Return Fund—During the period October 1, 2012 through May 16, 2013, the rate was .75% on the first $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .72% on the next $200 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $2.25 billion. Effective May 17, 2013, the rate was changed to .75% on the first $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .70% on the next $200 million, .65% on the next $500 million, .60% on the next $1 billion, declining by .05% on each $1 billion thereafter, down to .50% on average daily net assets over $3 billion.
Equity Income, Growth & Income, Select Growth, and Opportunity Funds—.75% on the first $300 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, .72% on the next $200 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $2.25 billion.
Global Fund—.95% on the first $600 million, .92% on the next $400 million, .90% on the next $500 million and .88% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. During the period May 17, 2013 through September 30, 2013, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $58,990 in advisory fees to limit the advisory fee to .90% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Special Situations Fund—1% on the first $200 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .75% on the next $300 million, .72% on the next $250 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, and .64% on average daily
202 |
net assets over $1.5 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2013, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $311,343 in advisory fees to limit the advisory fee to .80% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
International Fund—.98% on the first $300 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .95% on the next $300 million, .92% on the next $400 million, .90% on the next $500 million and .88% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion.
For the year ended September 30, 2013, total advisory fees accrued to FIMCO by the Income Funds and Equity Funds were $12,034,638 and $32,256,788, respectively, of which $2,269,638 and $370,333, respectively, was voluntarily waived by FIMCO as noted above.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the Strategic Income Fund (“SIF”) to limit SIF’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.30% of the average daily net assets on the Class A shares and 1.00% of the average daily net assets on Advisor Class shares. The agreement expires on April 3, 2014. For the period April 3, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013, FIMCO assumed $95,428 under the terms of the agreement. FIMCO and SIF have agreed that any expenses of SIF assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by SIF within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of SIF’s Class A shares and Advisor class shares to exceed the foregoing limits. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended prior to April 3, 2014, with the approval of the Board.
FIMCO has entered into an expense limitation agreement with the International Opportunities Bond Fund (“IOBF”) to limit IOBF’s total annual fund operating expenses (exclusive of interest expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, dividend costs related to short sales, and extraordinary expenses, such as litigation expenses, if any) to 1.30% of the average daily net assets on the Class A shares. The agreement expires on January 31, 2014. For the year ended September 30, 2013, FIMCO assumed $368,364, including $140,121 of offering expenses amortized in connection with the organization of IOBF under the terms of the agreement. FIMCO and IOBF have agreed that any expenses of IOBF assumed by FIMCO pursuant to this agreement be repaid to FIMCO by IOBF within three years after the date the fee limitation and/or expense reimbursement has been made by FIMCO, provided that such repayment does not cause the expenses of IOBF’s Class A shares to exceed the foregoing limits. The expense limitation agreement may be terminated or amended
203 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
prior to January 31, 2014, with the approval of the Board. For the period August 20, 2012 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013, the total organizational expenses and expenses incurred in excess of the above stated limitation was $506,491.
For the year ended September 30, 2013, FIC, as underwriter, received from the Income Funds and Equity Funds $8,456,555 and $19,564,070, respectively, in commissions in connection with the sale of shares of the Funds, after allowing $15,383 and $62,522, respectively, to other dealers. For the year ended September 30, 2013, shareholder servicing costs for the Income Funds and Equity Funds included $2,777,169 (of which $46,480 was voluntarily waived by ADM on the Cash Management Fund) and $6,921,595, respectively, in transfer agent fees accrued to ADM and $228,312 and $1,002,530, respectively, in retirement accounts custodian fees accrued to ADM.
ADM has entered into an agreement with the Funds to limit the transfer agency expenses for Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares to 0.20% and 0.05%, of the Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares average daily net assets, respectively. The agreement expires on May 1, 2014. ADM can be reimbursed by each Class within three years after the date the expense limitation has been made by ADM, provided that such repayment does not cause the transfer agency expenses of Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares to exceed the foregoing limits. The expense limitation may be terminated or amended prior to May 1, 2014, with the approval of the Board. For the year ended September 30, 2013, shareholder servicing costs of $111 and $278 on the Income Funds and Equity Funds, respectively, were waived by ADM on the Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares as noted above.
Pursuant to Distribution Plans adopted under Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, each Fund, other than the Cash Management Fund, is authorized to pay FIC a fee up to .30% of the average daily net assets of the Class A shares and 1% of the average daily net assets of the Class B shares on an annualized basis each fiscal year, payable monthly. The Cash Management Fund is authorized to pay FIC a fee up to 1% of the average daily net assets of the Class B shares. The fee consists of a distribution fee and a service fee. The service fee is paid for the ongoing servicing of clients who are shareholders of that Fund. For the year ended September 30, 2013, total distribution plan fees accrued to FIC by the Income Funds and Equity Funds amounted to $5,074,739 and $13,271,707, respectively.
Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC, serves as investment subadviser to International Opportunities Bond Fund. Muzinich & Co., Inc., serves as investment subadviser to Fund For Income. Wellington Management Company, LLP serves as
204 |
investment subadviser to Global Fund. Smith Asset Management Group, L.P. serves as investment subadviser to Select Growth Fund. Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. serves as investment subadviser to International Fund. Paradigm Capital Management, Inc. served as investment subadviser to Special Situations Fund for the period October 1, 2012 through September 20, 2013. The subadvisers are paid by FIMCO and not by the Funds.
4. Restricted Securities—Certain restricted securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 and may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. Unless otherwise noted, these 144A securities are deemed to be liquid. At September 30, 2013, Investment Grade Fund held twenty-four 144A securities with an aggregate value of $86,539,494 representing 15.5% of the Fund’s net assets, International Opportunities Bond Fund held five 144A securities with an aggregate value of $4,294,235 representing 4.0% of the Fund’s net assets, Fund For Income held one hundred twenty-three 144A securities with an aggregate value of $241,999,504 representing 36.1% of the Fund’s net assets and Total Return Fund held twenty-one 144A securities with an aggregate value of $23,516,802 representing 3.5% of the Fund’s net assets. Certain restricted securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and may only be sold to qualified investors. Unless otherwise noted, these Section 4(2) securities are deemed to be liquid. At September 30, 2013, Cash Management Fund held six Section 4(2) securities with an aggregate value of $30,490,304 representing 23.3% of the Fund’s net assets. These securities are valued as set forth in Note 1A.
5. Derivatives—The Funds (other than the Cash Management and Strategic Income Funds) may invest in derivatives such as futures contracts (“futures contracts”) and options on futures contracts (“options”), to increase income, hedge against changes in interest rates or enhance potential return.
The Funds may enter into interest rate futures contracts on U.S. Treasury obligations and options thereon that are traded on a U.S. exchange. An interest rate futures contract provides for the future sale by one party and the purchase by another party of a specified amount of a particular financial instrument (debt security) at a specified price, date, time and place. Such investments may be used for the purpose of hedging against changes in the value of a Fund’s portfolio securities due to anticipated changes in interest rates and market conditions. A public market exists for interest rate futures contracts covering a number of debt securities, including long-term U.S. Treasury Bonds, 10-year U.S. Treasury Notes and three-month U.S. Treasury Bills. No price is paid upon entering into futures contracts. Instead, upon entering into a futures contract, the Funds are required to deposit with their custodian in a segregated account in the name of the futures broker through which the transaction is effected an amount of cash or U.S. Government
205 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
securities generally equal to 3%-5% or less of the contract value. This amount is known as “initial margin.”
An option on an interest rate futures contract generally gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in a futures contract at a specified exercise price at any time prior to the expiration date of the option. The Funds may purchase put and call options on interest rate futures contracts on U.S. Treasury obligations which are traded on a U.S. exchange as a hedge against changes in interest rates, and may enter into closing transactions with respect to such options to terminate existing positions. There is no guarantee such closing transactions can be effected. When writing a call or put option on a futures contract, margin also must be deposited in accordance with applicable exchange rules. Initial margin on futures contracts is in the nature of a performance bond or good-faith deposit that is returned to a Fund upon termination of the transaction, assuming all obligations have been satisfied. Under certain circumstances, such as periods of high volatility, a Fund may be required by an exchange to increase the level of its initial margin payment. Subsequent payments, called “variation margin,” to and from the broker, are made on a daily basis as the value of the futures position varies, a process known as “marking to market.” Variation margin does not involve borrowing to finance the futures transactions, but rather represents a daily settlement of a Fund’s obligation to or from a clearing organization. A Fund is also obligated to make initial and variation margin payments when it writes options on futures contracts.
To the extent that a Fund participates in the futures or options markets, it will incur investment risks and transaction costs to which it would not be subject absent the use of these strategies. The use of these strategies involves certain special risks, including: (1) dependence on the ability of the Funds’ investment adviser, FIMCO to predict correctly movements in the direction of interest rates and securities prices; (2) imperfect correlation between the price of futures contracts and options thereon and movements in the prices of the securities or currencies being hedged; (3) the fact that skills needed to use these strategies are different from those needed to select portfolio securities; (4) the leverage (if any) that is created by investing in the option or futures contract; and (5) the possible absence of a liquid secondary market for any particular instrument at any time. If FIMCO’s prediction of movements in the direction of the securities and interest rate markets is inaccurate, the adverse consequences to that Fund may leave it in a worse position than if such strategies were not used.
During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Government and Investment Grade Funds participated in interest rate futures contracts. At September 30, 2013, the Funds had no open investments in futures contracts or options.
206 |
For the year ended September 30, 2013, the effect of derivative instruments in the Statements of Operations is as follows:
Net Realized Gain (Loss | ) | |||
Fund | on Futures Contracts | |||
Government | $3,234 | |||
Investment Grade | $(822 | ) |
6. High Yield Credit Risk—The investments of Fund For Income in high yield securities whether rated or unrated may be considered speculative and subject to greater market fluctuations and risks of loss of income and principal than lower-yielding, higher-rated, fixed-income securities. The risk of loss due to default by the issuer may be significantly greater for holders of high-yielding securities, because such securities are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors of the issuer.
7. Foreign Exchange Contracts—The International Opportunities Bond Fund may enter into foreign exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of foreign currencies at negotiated rates at future dates. These contracts are considered derivative instruments and are used to decrease exposure to foreign exchange risk associated with foreign currency denominated securities held by the Fund. The Fund could be exposed to risk if counter parties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts or if the value of the foreign currency changes unfavorably. Foreign exchange contracts are “marked-to-market” daily at the applicable translation rate and the resulting unrealized gains and losses are reflected in the Fund’s assets.
The International Opportunities Bond Fund had the following foreign exchange contracts open at September 30, 2013:
Contracts to Buy | Unrealized | |||||||||||
Foreign Currency | In Exchange for | Settlement Date | Gain | |||||||||
761,000,000 | Chilean Peso | US $ | 1,491,501 | 10/17/13 | US $ | 20,445 | ||||||
413,000,000 | Chilean Peso | 809,054 | 11/8/13 | 11,489 | ||||||||
126,000,000 | Chilean Peso | 245,136 | 11/8/13 | 5,199 | ||||||||
1,205,000,000 | Chilean Peso | 2,349,386 | 12/12/13 | 44,693 | ||||||||
321,000,000 | Indian Rupee | 4,860,476 | 12/18/13 | 266,910 | ||||||||
276,000,000 | Hungarian Forint | 1,209,200 | 12/18/13 | 46,834 | ||||||||
$ | 10,964,753 | $ | 395,570 |
207 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
Contracts to Sell | Unrealized | |||||||||||
Foreign Currency | In Exchange for | Settlement Date | Loss | |||||||||
13,890,000 | Polish Zloty | US $ | 4,131,657 | 10/10/13 | US $ | (318,127) | ||||||
2,646,000,000 | Korean Won | 2,332,179 | 10/18/13 | (129,961) | ||||||||
1,050,000 | Euro | 1,388,536 | 11/7/13 | (32,803) | ||||||||
12,780,000 | Australian Dollar | 11,458,636 | 11/12/13 | (491,320) | ||||||||
2,293,000,000 | Korean Won | 2,044,219 | 11/15/13 | (89,450) | ||||||||
4,900,000 | New Zealand Dollar | 4,008,273 | 1/17/14 | (72,951) | ||||||||
$ | 25,363,500 | $ | (1,134,612) | |||||||||
Net Unrealized Loss on Forward Currency Contracts | $ | (739,042) |
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments—The fair value of derivative instruments on the International Opportunities Bond Fund as of September 30, 2013, was as follows:
Assets Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | ||||||
Derivatives not accounted for | |||||||
as hedging instruments under | Statements of Assets | Statements of Assets | |||||
ASC 815 | and Liabilities Location | Value | and Liabilities Location | Value | |||
Foreign exchange contracts: | Unrealized appreciation | Unrealized depreciation | |||||
of foreign exchange | of foreign exchange | ||||||
contracts | $395,570 | contracts | $1,134,612 |
The effect of International Opportunities Bond Fund derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations are as follows:
Amount of Realized Gain or Loss Recognized on Derivatives | ||
Derivatives not accounted | Net Realized Gain | |
for as hedging instruments | on Foreign Exchange | |
under ASC 815 | Transactions | |
Foreign exchange transactions | $627,726 | |
Amount of Change in Unrealized Gain or Loss Recognized on Derivatives | ||
Derivatives not accounted | Net Unrealized Depreciation | |
for as hedging instruments | on Foreign Exchange | |
under ASC 815 | Transactions | |
Foreign exchange transactions | $(739,042) |
208 |
8. Capital—The Trusts are authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest without par value. The Trusts consist of the Funds listed on the cover page, each of which is a separate and distinct series of the Trusts. Each Fund has designated four classes of shares, Class A, Class B, Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares (each, a “Class”) except for Cash Management Fund which has only designated Class A, Class B and Institutional Class shares, Strategic Income Fund which has only designated Class A and Advisor Class shares and International Opportunities Bond Fund which has only designated Class A, Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares. Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares are new classes that have been added to the Trust. Institutional Class and Advisor Class shares were available for sale to the public in May 2013 and October 2013, respectively. Not all classes of share of each Fund may be available in all jurisdictions. Each share of each Class has an equal beneficial interest in the assets, has identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and is subject to the same terms and conditions except that expenses allocated to a Class may be borne solely by that Class as determined by the Trustees and a Class may have exclusive voting rights with respect to matters affecting only that Class. Cash Management Fund’s Class A, Class B and Institutional Class shares are sold without an initial sales charge; however, its Class B shares may only be acquired through an exchange of Class B shares from another First Investors eligible Fund or through the reinvestment of dividends on Class B shares and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge at the rate of 4% in the first year and declining to 0% over a six-year period, which is payable to FIC as underwriter of the Trusts. The shares sold by the other Funds have a public offering price that reflects different sales charges and expense levels. Class A shares are sold with an initial sales charge of up to 5.75% of the amount invested and together with the Class B shares are subject to distribution plan fees as described in Note 3. Class B shares are sold without an initial sales charge, but are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge which declines in steps from 4% to 0% over a six-year period. Class B shares automatically convert into Class A shares after eight years. There are no sales charges associated with the purchase of Advisor Class and Institutional Class shares. Realized and unrealized gains or losses, investment income and expenses (other than distribution plan fees) are allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the relative proportion of net assets to each class.
209 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
9. Tax Components of Capital and Distributions to Shareholders—The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 were as follows:
Year Ended September 30, 2013 | Year Ended September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions | Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||
Declared from | Declared from | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term | Long-Term | ||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary | Capital | Ordinary | Capital | ||||||||||||||||
Fund | Income | Gain | Total | Income | Gain | Total | |||||||||||||
Government | $ | 10,754,418 | $ | — | $ | 10,754,418 | $ | 12,155,577 | $ | — | $ | 12,155,577 | |||||||
Investment Grade | 21,073,207 | — | 21,073,207 | 20,074,396 | — | 20,074,396 | |||||||||||||
Strategic Income | 321,814 | — | 321,814 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
International | |||||||||||||||||||
Opportunities Bond | 2,186,036 | — | 2,186,036 | 24,887 | — | 24,887 | |||||||||||||
Fund For Income | 37,031,243 | — | 37,031,243 | 35,665,019 | — | 35,665,019 | |||||||||||||
Total Return | 13,005,892 | 6,716,504 | 19,722,396 | 8,939,972 | — | 8,939,972 | |||||||||||||
Equity Income | 7,100,883 | — | 7,100,883 | 5,040,742 | — | 5,040,742 | |||||||||||||
Growth & Income | 16,710,427 | — | 16,710,427 | 9,129,438 | — | 9,129,438 | |||||||||||||
Global | 1,442,712 | — | 1,442,712 | 688,744 | — | 688,744 | |||||||||||||
Opportunity | 9,773,265 | 9,936,464 | 19,709,729 | 2,940,690 | 15,873,389 | 18,814,079 | |||||||||||||
Special Situations | 8,673,458 | 7,248,069 | 15,921,527 | 387,088 | 23,479,691 | 23,866,779 | |||||||||||||
International | — | — | — | 2,185,379 | — | 2,185,379 |
As of September 30, 2013, the components of distributable earnings (deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Undistributed | Undistributed | Capital | Accumulated | Unrealized | Distributable | |||||||||||||||
Ordinary | Capital | Losses | Gains | Appreciation | Earnings | |||||||||||||||
Fund | Income | Gains | Carryover | (Losses | )* | (Depreciation | ) | (Deficit | )** | |||||||||||
Government | $ | 55,298 | $ | — | $ | (7,061,305 | ) | $ | (6,969,278 | ) | $ | 5,403,441 | $ | (8,571,844 | ) | |||||
Investment Grade | 543,108 | — | (13,584,806 | ) | — | 18,159,699 | 5,118,001 | |||||||||||||
Strategic Income | 45,746 | — | — | — | (602,012 | ) | (556,266 | ) | ||||||||||||
International | ||||||||||||||||||||
Opportunities Bond | 27,194 | — | — | 92,245 | (3,683,381 | ) | (3,563,942 | ) | ||||||||||||
Fund For Income | 63,951 | — | (166,931,606 | ) | — | 5,822,357 | (161,045,298 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Return | 3,064,627 | 9,812,963 | — | — | 150,870,652 | 163,748,242 | ||||||||||||||
Equity Income | 2,668,541 | 2,888,556 | — | — | 115,835,812 | 121,392,909 | ||||||||||||||
Growth & Income | 16,848,185 | 37,636,903 | — | — | 544,316,344 | 598,801,432 | ||||||||||||||
Global | 1,203,289 | 682,048 | — | (59,701 | ) | 68,014,005 | 69,839,641 | |||||||||||||
Select Growth | 137,030 | — | (31,245,713 | ) | (90,101 | ) | 79,643,393 | 48,444,609 | ||||||||||||
Opportunity | 10,916,098 | 38,664,576 | — | — | 267,828,178 | 317,408,852 | ||||||||||||||
Special Situations | 7,180,370 | 61,337,730 | — | — | 56,437,110 | 124,955,210 | ||||||||||||||
International | 446,680 | — | (26,152,463 | ) | (128,516 | ) | 44,832,514 | 18,998,215 |
210 |
* Other accumulated losses consist primarily of late loss deferral and post-October loss deferrals.
** Differences between book distributable earnings and tax distributable earnings consist primarily of wash sales and amortization of bond premium and discounts.
For the year ended September 30, 2013, the following reclassifications were made to reflect permanent differences between book and tax reporting which are primarily due to the differences between book and tax treatment of investments in real estate trusts, bond premium amortization, foreign currency transactions, paydowns on securities, tax equalization and redesignation of distributions.
Undistributed | Accumulated | ||||||||||
Ordinary Income | Capital Gains | ||||||||||
Fund | Capital Paid In | (Deficit | ) | (Losses | ) | ||||||
Government | $ | — | $ | 4,865,404 | $ | (4,865,404 | ) | ||||
Investment Grade | — | 865,372 | (865,372 | ) | |||||||
International Opportunities | |||||||||||
Bond | (1,064 | ) | 1,745,555 | (1,744,491 | ) | ||||||
Fund For Income | — | 2,258,851 | (2,258,851 | ) | |||||||
Total Return | — | 938,685 | (938,685 | ) | |||||||
Global | 38,243 | (55,154 | ) | 16,911 | |||||||
Opportunity | 3,436,957 | (222,582 | ) | (3,214,375 | ) | ||||||
Special Situations | 2,045,454 | 36,575 | (2,082,029 | ) | |||||||
International | — | (135,870 | ) | 135,870 |
10. New Accounting Pronouncements—In January 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-01, Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities (“ASU No. 2013-01”). This update gives additional clarification to the FASB ASU No. 2011-11 Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amendments in ASU No. 2013-01 require an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. ASU No. 2013-01 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The guidance requires retrospective application for all comparative periods presented. Management is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2013-01 will have on the financial statement disclosure.
11. Reorganization of Blue Chip Fund into Growth & Income Fund—On December 9, 2011, the Growth & Income Fund acquired all of the net assets of the Blue Chip Fund in connection with a tax-free reorganization that was approved by the Equity Funds’ Board of Trustees. The Growth & Income Fund issued 25,233,878 Class A shares and 715,868 Class B shares to the Blue Chip Fund in connection with
211 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2013
the reorganization. In return, it received net assets of $373,986,545 from the Blue Chip Fund (which included $31,271,862 of unrealized appreciation and $17,652,665 of accumulated net realized losses). The Growth & Income Fund’s shares were issued at their current net asset values as of the date of the reorganization. The aggregate net assets of the Growth & Income Fund and Blue Chip Fund immediately before the acquisition were $1,106,393,661 consisting of, with respect to Growth & Income Fund, $732,407,116 ($712,314,779 Class A and $20,092,337 Class B) and, with respect to Blue Chip Fund, $373,986,545 ($364,273,402 Class A and $9,713,143 Class B).
12. Litigation—The Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds have been named, and have received notice that they may be putative members of the proposed defendant class of shareholders, in a lawsuit filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on November 1, 2010, by the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Tribune Company (the “Committee”). The Committee is seeking to recover all payments made to beneficial owners of common stock in connection with a leveraged buyout of the Tribune Company (“LBO”), including payments made in connection with a 2007 tender offer into which the Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds tendered their shares of common stock of the Tribune Company. On December 9, 2011, the Blue Chip Fund was reorganized into the Growth & Income Fund pursuant to a Plan of Reorganization and Termination, whereby all of the assets of the Blue Chip Fund were transferred to the Growth & Income Fund, the Growth & Income Fund assumed all of the liabilities of the Blue Chip Fund, including any contingent liabilities with respect to pending or threatened litigation or actions, and shareholders of Blue Chip Fund became shareholders of Growth & Income Fund. The adversary proceeding brought by the Committee has been transferred to the Southern District of New York and consolidated with other similar suits as discussed below. In addition, on June 2, 2011, the Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds were named as defendants in a lawsuit brought in connection with the Tribune Company's LBO by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for a certain series of Senior Notes, Law Debenture Trust Company of New York, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for a certain series of Senior Notes, and Wilmington Trust Company, in its capacity as successor indenture trustee for the PHONES Notes (together, the “Bondholder Plaintiffs”) in the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This suit has been removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and consolidated with other substantially similar suits against other former Tribune shareholders. The Bondholder Plaintiffs also seek to recover payments of the proceeds of the LBO. The Blue Chip and Equity Income Funds have also been named in a similar suit filed on behalf of participants in Tribune defined-compensation plans (the “Retiree Plaintiffs”). That suit was also initially filed in the Supreme Court of New York but later removed and consolidated in the Southern District of New York with the other Tribune suits. As
212 |
with the Bondholder Plaintiffs and the Committee, the Retiree Plaintiffs seek to recover payments of the proceeds of the LBO. The extent of the Funds' potential liability in any such actions has not been determined. The Funds have been advised by counsel that the Funds could be held liable to return all or part of the proceeds received in any of these actions, as well as interest and court costs, even though the Funds had no knowledge of, or participation in, any misconduct. The Equity Income Fund received proceeds of $1,526,566 in connection with the LBO, representing 0.31% of its net assets as of September 30, 2013. The Blue Chip Fund received proceeds of $790,772 in connection with the LBO, representing 0.05% of the net assets of Growth & Income Fund as of September 30, 2013. The Equity Income and Growth & Income Funds cannot predict the outcomes of these proceedings, and thus have not accrued any of the amounts sought in the various actions in the accompanying financial statements.
13. New Fund—On December 13, 2012, the Board approved the establishment of a new series of the First Investors Income Funds, First Investors Floating Rate Fund (the “Floating Rate Fund”). The Floating Rate Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as a diversified fund and is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest of Class A, Advisor Class and Institutional Class. Under normal circumstances, the Fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in floating rate loans and/or bonds. The investment objective of the Fund is to seek a high level of current income. The Fund commenced operations on October 21, 2013.
14. Subsequent Events—Subsequent events occurring after September 30, 2013 have been evaluated for potential impact to this report through the date the financial statements were issued. There were no subsequent events to report that would have a material impact on the Funds’ financial statements.
213 |
Financial Highlights
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
The following table sets forth the per share operating performance data for a share outstanding, total return, ratios to average net assets and other supplemental data for each fiscal year ended September 30, except as otherwise indicated.
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | Income | Expenses | (a) | Income (Loss | ) | Rate | |||||||||||||
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $ 1.00 | $.005 | — | $.005 | $.005 | — | $.005 | $ 1.00 | 0.54 | % | $172,336 | .71 | % | .71 | % | .58 | % | 1.03 | % | .26 | % | N/A | |||||||||||
2010 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 134,103 | .30 | .30 | .00 | 1.08 | (.78 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 148,171 | .17 | .17 | .00 | 1.06 | (.89 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 135,028 | .12 | .12 | .00 | 1.02 | (.90 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 130,272 | .11 | .11 | .00 | .97 | (.86 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 1.00 | .001 | — | .001 | .001 | — | .001 | 1.00 | 0.14 | 3,430 | 1.13 | 1.13 | .16 | 1.78 | (.49 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1,739 | .30 | .30 | .00 | 1.83 | (1.53 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1,519 | .17 | .17 | .00 | 1.81 | (1.64 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 896 | .12 | .12 | .00 | 1.77 | (1.65 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | 571 | .12 | .12 | .00 | 1.72 | (1.60 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | 0.00 | † | 1 | .15 | †† | .15 | †† | .00 | †† | 2.60 | †† | (2.45 | )†† | N/A | |||||||||||
GOVERNMENT FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $10.76 | $ .47 | $ .44 | $ .91 | $ .47 | — | $ .47 | $11.20 | 8.59 | % | $286,844 | 1.10 | % | 1.10 | % | 4.03 | % | 1.26 | % | 3.87 | % | 43 | % | ||||||||||
2010 | 11.20 | .43 | .16 | .59 | .43 | — | .43 | 11.36 | 5.39 | 325,979 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 3.44 | 1.24 | 3.33 | 42 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 11.36 | .36 | .28 | .64 | .41 | — | .41 | 11.59 | 5.73 | 346,828 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 3.12 | 1.23 | 3.01 | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 11.59 | .27 | .04 | .31 | .38 | — | .38 | 11.52 | 2.71 | 382,064 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 2.28 | 1.21 | 2.17 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 11.52 | .17 | (.43 | ) | (.26 | ) | .32 | — | .32 | 10.94 | (2.29 | ) | 355,264 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 1.57 | 1.21 | 1.46 | 101 | ||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 10.76 | .39 | .43 | .82 | .39 | — | .39 | 11.19 | 7.75 | 13,131 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 3.33 | 1.96 | 3.17 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 11.19 | .35 | .17 | .52 | .36 | — | .36 | 11.35 | 4.70 | 10,860 | 1.83 | 1.83 | 2.74 | 1.94 | 2.63 | 42 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 11.35 | .26 | .29 | .55 | .33 | — | .33 | 11.57 | 4.94 | 7,284 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 2.42 | 1.93 | 2.31 | 35 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 11.57 | .17 | .07 | .24 | .30 | — | .30 | 11.51 | 2.11 | 6,393 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.59 | 1.91 | 1.47 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 11.51 | .07 | (.42 | ) | (.35 | ) | .24 | — | .24 | 10.92 | (3.06 | ) | 4,717 | 1.84 | 1.84 | .82 | 1.95 | .71 | 101 | ||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 11.29 | .10 | (.30 | ) | (.20 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 10.94 | (1.75 | )† | 1 | .95 | †† | .95 | †† | 1.68 | †† | 5.17 | †† | (2.54 | )†† | 101 | |||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 11.29 | .14 | (.31 | ) | (.17 | ) | .16 | — | .16 | 10.96 | (1.54 | )† | 4,656 | .68 | †† | .68 | †† | 2.14 | †† | .81 | †† | 2.01 | †† | 101 |
214 | 215 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Investment | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Income | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | (Loss | ) | Expenses | (a) | (Loss | ) | Rate | ||||||||||||
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $ 8.23 | $.49 | $ .85 | $1.34 | $.47 | — | $.47 | $ 9.10 | 17.06 | % | $325,316 | 1.10 | % | 1.10 | % | 5.29 | % | 1.27 | % | 5.12 | % | 79 | % | ||||||||||
2010 | 9.10 | .44 | .72 | 1.16 | .45 | — | .45 | 9.81 | 13.09 | 404,841 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 4.75 | 1.23 | 4.64 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 9.81 | .40 | (.16 | ) | .24 | .43 | — | .43 | 9.62 | 2.48 | 437,094 | 1.11 | 1.11 | 3.94 | 1.22 | 3.83 | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 9.62 | .38 | .68 | 1.06 | .41 | — | .41 | 10.27 | 11.22 | 531,896 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 3.54 | 1.19 | 3.43 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 10.27 | .35 | (.46 | ) | (.11 | ) | .38 | — | .38 | 9.78 | (1.10 | ) | 543,955 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 3.20 | 1.18 | 3.09 | 33 | ||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 8.22 | .44 | .85 | 1.29 | .40 | — | .40 | 9.11 | 16.35 | 16,370 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 4.59 | 1.97 | 4.42 | 79 | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 9.11 | .39 | .70 | 1.09 | .39 | — | .39 | 9.81 | 12.20 | 13,855 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 4.05 | 1.93 | 3.94 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 9.81 | .33 | (.16 | ) | .17 | .36 | — | .36 | 9.62 | 1.81 | 9,976 | 1.81 | 1.81 | 3.24 | 1.92 | 3.13 | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 9.62 | .32 | .66 | .98 | .34 | — | .34 | 10.26 | 10.41 | 8,036 | 1.78 | 1.78 | 2.84 | 1.89 | 2.74 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 10.26 | .27 | (.45 | ) | (.18 | ) | .32 | — | .32 | 9.76 | (1.82 | ) | 6,161 | 1.84 | 1.84 | 2.42 | 1.94 | 2.32 | 33 | ||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 10.23 | .08 | (.34 | ) | (.26 | ) | .19 | — | .19 | 9.78 | (2.53 | )† | 1 | .95 | †† | .95 | †† | 2.64 | †† | 5.17 | †† | (1.58 | )†† | 33 | |||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 10.23 | .14 | (.38 | ) | (.24 | ) | .20 | — | .20 | 9.79 | (2.37 | )† | 9,326 | .66 | †† | .66 | †† | 3.06 | †† | .77 | †† | 2.95 | †† | 33 | |||||||||
STRATEGIC INCOME FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013♦ | $10.00 | $.14 | ◄ | $(.23 | ) | $(.09 | ) | $.13 | — | $.13 | $ 9.78 | (.87 | )%† | $ 47,344 | 1.30 | %††► | 1.30 | %††► | 2.88 | %††◄ | 2.10 | %††► | 2.08 | %††◄ | 19 | % | |||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013♦ | 10.00 | .14 | ◄ | (.22 | ) | (.08 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 9.77 | (.79 | )† | 1 | 1.00 | ††► | 1.00 | ††► | 2.89 | ††◄ | 14.79 | ††► | (10.90 | )††◄ | 19 | ||||||||
INTERNATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES BOND FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012▲ | $10.00 | $.01 | $ .23 | $ .24 | $.02 | $— | $.02 | $10.22 | 2.35 | %† | $ 19,563 | 1.30 | %†† | 1.30 | %†† | 1.10 | %†† | 9.76 | %†† | (6.12 | )%†† | 5 | % | ||||||||||
2013 | 10.22 | .25 | (.32 | ) | (.07 | ) | .30 | .01 | .31 | 9.84 | (.72 | ) | 99,161 | 1.30 | 1.30 | .68 | 1.83 | .15 | 53 | ||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 10.23 | .08 | (.31 | ) | (.23 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 9.85 | (2.26 | )† | 1 | 1.07 | †† | 1.07 | †† | (1.43 | )†† | 5.23 | †† | (5.59 | )†† | 53 | |||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 10.23 | .12 | (.35 | ) | (.23 | ) | .15 | — | .15 | 9.85 | (2.26 | )† | 6,998 | .96 | †† | .96 | †† | (1.31 | )†† | .96 | †† | (1.31 | )†† | 53 |
216 | 217 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | Income | Expenses | (a) | Income | Rate | ||||||||||||||
FUND FOR INCOME | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $2.45 | $.20 | $(.13 | ) | $.07 | $.20 | — | $.20 | $2.32 | 4.28 | % | $438,248 | 1.38 | % | 1.38 | % | 9.10 | % | 1.42 | % | 9.06 | 73 | % | ||||||||||
2010 | 2.32 | .17 | .18 | .35 | .18 | — | .18 | 2.49 | 15.68 | 504,507 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 7.32 | 1.33 | 7.28 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2.49 | .17 | (.14 | ) | .03 | .17 | — | .17 | 2.35 | 1.00 | 504,839 | 1.27 | 1.27 | 6.43 | 1.30 | 6.40 | 75 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2.35 | .16 | .25 | .41 | .16 | — | .16 | 2.60 | 17.79 | 602,370 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 6.01 | 1.29 | 5.98 | 54 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2.60 | .15 | (.01 | ) | .14 | .15 | — | .15 | 2.59 | 5.55 | 647,603 | 1.23 | 1.23 | 5.17 | 1.25 | 5.15 | 60 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2.45 | .19 | (.13 | ) | .06 | .18 | — | .18 | 2.33 | 3.75 | 11,699 | 2.08 | 2.08 | 8.40 | 2.12 | 8.36 | 73 | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2.33 | .16 | .16 | .32 | .16 | — | .16 | 2.49 | 14.43 | 10,891 | 1.99 | 1.99 | 6.62 | 2.03 | 6.58 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2.49 | .15 | (.13 | ) | .02 | .16 | — | .16 | 2.35 | .38 | 7,580 | 1.97 | 1.97 | 5.75 | 2.00 | 5.72 | 75 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 2.35 | .13 | .26 | .39 | .14 | — | .14 | 2.60 | 17.01 | 5,659 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 5.31 | 1.99 | 5.28 | 54 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 2.60 | .13 | (.01 | ) | .12 | .13 | — | .13 | 2.59 | 4.84 | 5,001 | 1.99 | 1.99 | 4.42 | 2.01 | 4.40 | 60 | ||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 2.66 | .06 | (.05 | ) | .01 | .08 | — | .08 | 2.59 | .23 | † | 1 | 1.03 | †† | 1.03 | †† | 4.59 | †† | 5.13 | †† | .49 | †† | 60 | ||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 2.66 | .03 | (.01 | ) | .02 | .08 | — | .08 | 2.60 | .66 | † | 18,575 | .81 | †† | .81 | †† | 4.93 | †† | .83 | †† | 4.91 | †† | 60 |
* | Calculated without sales charges. | |
** | Net of expenses waived or assumed (Note 3). | |
▪ | For the period April 1, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013. | |
♦ | For the period April 3, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013. | |
◄ | Recognition of net investment income by the Fund is affected by the timing of the declaration of dividends by the underlying investment companies in which the Fund invests. The ratio does not include net investment income of the investment companies in which the Fund invests. | |
► | Does not include expenses of the investment companies in which the Fund invests. | |
▲ | For the period August 20, 2012 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2012. | |
† | Not annualized | |
†† | Annualized | |
(a) | The ratios do not include a reduction of expenses from cash balances maintained with the custodian or from brokerage service arrangements (Note 1G). |
218 | See notes to financial statements | 219 |
Financial Highlights
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
The following table sets forth the per share operating performance data for a share outstanding, total return, ratios to average net assets and other supplemental data for each fiscal year ended September 30, except as otherwise indicated.
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Investment | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Income | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Period | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | Income | Expenses | (a) | (Loss | ) | Rate | |||||||||||||
TOTAL RETURN FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $13.24 | $.30 | $ .03 | $ .33 | $.32 | $— | $.32 | $13.25 | 2.77 | % | $315,612 | 1.43 | % | 1.43 | % | 2.35 | % | N/A | N/A | 53 | % | ||||||||||||
2010 | 13.25 | .28 | .95 | 1.23 | .29 | — | .29 | 14.19 | 9.38 | 360,843 | 1.37 | 1.37 | 2.02 | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 14.19 | .31 | (.06 | ) | .25 | .34 | — | .34 | 14.10 | 1.65 | 384,720 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.97 | N/A | N/A | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 14.10 | .30 | 2.71 | 3.01 | .30 | — | .30 | 16.81 | 21.46 | 532,551 | 1.32 | 1.32 | 1.79 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 16.81 | .27 | 1.99 | 2.26 | .34 | .24 | .58 | 18.49 | 13.77 | 664,054 | 1.26 | 1.26 | 1.45 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 13.03 | .21 | .03 | .24 | .23 | — | .23 | 13.04 | 2.10 | 20,575 | 2.13 | 2.13 | 1.65 | N/A | N/A | 53 | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 13.04 | .18 | .94 | 1.12 | .20 | — | .20 | 13.96 | 8.62 | 16,982 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 1.32 | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 13.96 | .19 | (.04 | ) | .15 | .23 | — | .23 | 13.88 | 1.01 | 12,961 | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.30 | N/A | N/A | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
2012 | 13.88 | .18 | 2.65 | 2.83 | .18 | — | .18 | 16.53 | 20.49 | 10,872 | 2.02 | 2.02 | 1.09 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 16.53 | .15 | 1.95 | 2.10 | .22 | .24 | .46 | 18.17 | 12.98 | 10,207 | 2.01 | 2.01 | .71 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 17.62 | .09 | .95 | 1.04 | .17 | — | .17 | 18.49 | 5.89 | † | 1 | 1.01 | †† | 1.01 | †† | 1.40 | †† | 4.76 | %†† | (2.35 | )%†† | 32 | |||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 17.62 | .10 | .95 | 1.05 | .17 | — | .17 | 18.50 | 5.98 | † | 1 | .82 | †† | .82 | †† | 1.48 | †† | 4.35 | †† | (2.05 | )†† | 32 | |||||||||||
EQUITY INCOME(b) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $ 6.65 | $.11 | $(.64 | ) | $(.53 | ) | $.11 | — | $.11 | $ 6.01 | (7.81 | )% | $308,402 | 1.48 | % | 1.48 | % | 2.14 | % | N/A | N/A | 15 | % | ||||||||||
2010 | 6.01 | .09 | .49 | .58 | .09 | — | .09 | 6.50 | 9.76 | 335,725 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.45 | N/A | N/A | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 6.50 | .11 | (.30 | ) | (.19 | ) | .11 | — | .11 | 6.20 | (3.12 | ) | 317,550 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.60 | N/A | N/A | 29 | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 6.20 | .13 | 1.44 | 1.57 | .10 | — | .10 | 7.67 | 25.36 | 392,001 | 1.33 | 1.33 | 1.75 | N/A | N/A | 38 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 7.67 | .14 | 1.32 | 1.46 | .14 | — | .14 | 8.99 | 19.14 | 475,422 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.66 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 6.55 | .08 | (.64 | ) | (.56 | ) | .07 | — | .07 | 5.92 | (8.43 | ) | 12,419 | 2.18 | 2.18 | 1.44 | N/A | N/A | 15 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 5.92 | .05 | .48 | .53 | .05 | — | .05 | 6.40 | 8.97 | 11,133 | 2.08 | 2.08 | .75 | N/A | N/A | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 6.40 | .06 | (.30 | ) | (.24 | ) | .06 | — | .06 | 6.10 | (3.87 | ) | 7,947 | 2.05 | 2.05 | .90 | N/A | N/A | 29 | ||||||||||||||
2012 | 6.10 | .08 | 1.42 | 1.50 | .05 | — | .05 | 7.55 | 24.56 | 6,939 | 2.03 | 2.03 | 1.02 | N/A | N/A | 38 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 7.55 | .09 | 1.28 | 1.37 | .08 | — | .08 | 8.84 | 18.21 | 6,337 | 2.05 | 2.05 | .90 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 8.40 | .08 | .58 | .66 | .07 | — | .07 | 8.99 | 7.87 | † | 1 | 1.01 | †† | 1.01 | †† | 1.78 | †† | 4.68 | %†† | (1.89 | )%†† | 32 | |||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 8.40 | .04 | .63 | .67 | .05 | — | .05 | 9.02 | 7.95 | † | 4,717 | .86 | †† | .86 | †† | 1.74 | †† | .86 | †† | 1.74 | †† | 32 |
220 | 221 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Distributions | Net Asset | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | in Excess of | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Net Investment | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss | ) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Income | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | Income (Loss | ) | Expenses | (a) | Income (Loss | ) | Rate | ||||||||||||
GROWTH & INCOME FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $13.00 | $ .09 | $(1.02 | ) | $(.93 | ) | $.14 | $.02 | — | $.16 | $11.91 | (6.93 | )% | $577,801 | 1.51 | % | 1.51 | % | .90 | % | N/A | N/A | 26 | % | |||||||||||
2010 | 11.91 | .09 | .98 | 1.07 | .07 | — | — | .07 | 12.91 | 9.01 | 626,370 | 1.39 | 1.39 | .68 | N/A | N/A | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 12.91 | .19 | (.14 | ) | .05 | .18 | — | — | .18 | 12.78 | .25 | 625,562 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 1.33 | N/A | N/A | 24 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 12.78 | .21 | 3.81 | 4.02 | .14 | — | — | .14 | 16.66 | 31.60 | 1,225,684 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 1.35 | N/A | N/A | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 16.66 | .20 | 3.90 | 4.10 | .22 | — | — | .22 | 20.54 | 24.86 | 1,538,582 | 1.22 | 1.22 | 1.11 | N/A | N/A | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 12.30 | .01 | (.97 | ) | (.96 | ) | .10 | .02 | — | .12 | 11.22 | (7.59 | ) | 30,490 | 2.21 | 2.21 | .20 | N/A | N/A | 26 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 11.22 | (.03 | ) | .95 | .92 | — | — | — | — | 12.14 | 8.23 | 26,160 | 2.09 | 2.09 | (.02 | ) | N/A | N/A | 25 | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 12.14 | .08 | (.12 | ) | (.04 | ) | .09 | — | — | .09 | 12.01 | (.44 | ) | 19,635 | 2.04 | 2.04 | .66 | N/A | N/A | 24 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 12.01 | .10 | 3.58 | 3.68 | .05 | — | — | .05 | 15.64 | 30.71 | 27,306 | 1.99 | 1.99 | .63 | N/A | N/A | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 15.64 | .06 | 3.67 | 3.73 | .11 | — | — | .11 | 19.26 | 24.02 | 27,762 | 1.96 | 1.96 | .37 | N/A | N/A | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 18.49 | .13 | 2.00 | 2.13 | .08 | — | — | .08 | 20.54 | 11.53 | † | 1 | .97 | †† | .97 | †† | 1.31 | †† | 4.60 | %†† | (2.32 | )%†† | 20 | ||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 18.49 | .15 | 2.00 | 2.15 | .09 | — | — | .09 | 20.55 | 11.64 | † | 1 | .78 | †† | .78 | †† | 1.50 | †† | 4.19 | †† | (1.91 | )†† | 20 | ||||||||||||
GLOBAL FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $ 5.75 | $ .02 | $ — | $ .02 | $.02 | — | $.02 | $.04 | $ 5.73 | .53 | % | $249,206 | 1.90 | % | 1.90 | % | .38 | % | 1.93 | % | .35 | % | 141 | % | |||||||||||
2010 | 5.73 | — | .42 | .42 | .01 | — | — | .01 | 6.14 | 7.33 | 269,075 | 1.72 | 1.72 | .04 | 1.75 | .01 | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 6.14 | .01 | (.61 | ) | (.60 | ) | — | — | — | — | 5.54 | (9.77 | ) | 241,494 | 1.67 | 1.67 | .18 | 1.70 | .15 | 103 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 5.54 | .03 | 1.24 | 1.27 | .02 | — | — | .02 | 6.79 | 22.88 | 283,328 | 1.68 | 1.69 | .44 | 1.70 | .42 | 94 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 6.79 | .05 | 1.20 | 1.25 | .03 | — | — | .03 | 8.01 | 18.56 | 317,329 | 1.60 | 1.61 | .66 | 1.62 | .65 | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 5.09 | (.03 | ) | — | (.03 | ) | .01 | — | .02 | .03 | 5.03 | (.37 | ) | 7,339 | 2.60 | 2.60 | (.32 | ) | 2.63 | (.35 | ) | 141 | |||||||||||||
2010 | 5.03 | (.06 | ) | .39 | .33 | — | — | — | — | 5.36 | 6.56 | 6,551 | 2.42 | 2.42 | (.66 | ) | 2.45 | (.69 | ) | 92 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 5.36 | (.09 | ) | (.46 | ) | (.55 | ) | — | — | — | — | 4.81 | (10.26 | ) | 4,515 | 2.37 | 2.37 | (.55 | ) | 2.40 | (.58 | ) | 103 | ||||||||||||
2012 | 4.81 | (.09 | ) | 1.15 | 1.06 | .01 | — | — | .01 | 5.86 | 21.99 | 4,388 | 2.38 | 2.39 | (.27 | ) | 2.40 | (.29 | ) | 94 | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 5.86 | (.07 | ) | 1.09 | 1.02 | .02 | — | — | .02 | 6.86 | 17.55 | 4,419 | 2.36 | 2.36 | (.10 | ) | 2.38 | (.12 | ) | 92 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 7.28 | .06 | .67 | .73 | — | — | — | — | 8.01 | 10.03 | † | 1 | 1.27 | †† | 1.27 | †† | 1.46 | †† | 4.88 | †† | (2.15 | )†† | 92 | ||||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 7.28 | .06 | .68 | .74 | — | — | — | — | 8.02 | 10.17 | † | 1 | 1.14 | †† | 1.14 | †† | 1.55 | †† | 4.59 | †† | (1.90 | )†† | 92 |
222 | 223 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss | ) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | (Loss | ) | Expenses | (a) | Loss | Rate | ||||||||||||
SELECT GROWTH FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $ 6.69 | $(.02 | ) | $(1.34 | ) | $(1.36 | ) | — | — | — | $ 5.33 | (20.33 | )% | $169,930 | 1.67 | % | 1.67 | % | (.51 | )% | N/A | N/A | 120 | % | |||||||||
2010 | 5.33 | (.03 | ) | .49 | .46 | — | — | — | 5.79 | 8.63 | 183,556 | 1.56 | 1.56 | (.48 | ) | N/A | N/A | 98 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 5.79 | (.02 | ) | .54 | .52 | — | — | — | 6.31 | 8.98 | 203,243 | 1.45 | 1.45 | (.28 | ) | N/A | N/A | 62 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 6.31 | (.03 | ) | 1.70 | 1.67 | — | — | — | 7.98 | 26.47 | 271,019 | 1.42 | 1.42 | (.35 | ) | N/A | N/A | 53 | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 7.98 | .02 | 1.24 | 1.26 | — | — | — | 9.24 | 15.79 | 315,833 | 1.35 | 1.35 | .25 | N/A | N/A | 71 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 6.25 | (.06 | ) | (1.25 | ) | (1.31 | ) | — | — | — | 4.94 | (20.96 | ) | 10,495 | 2.37 | 2.37 | (1.21 | ) | N/A | N/A | 120 | ||||||||||||
2010 | 4.94 | (.07 | ) | .46 | .39 | — | — | — | 5.33 | 7.90 | 8,423 | 2.26 | 2.26 | (1.18 | ) | N/A | N/A | 98 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 5.33 | (.07 | ) | .51 | .44 | — | — | — | 5.77 | 8.26 | 6,692 | 2.15 | 2.15 | (.98 | ) | N/A | N/A | 62 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 5.77 | (.09 | ) | 1.57 | 1.48 | — | — | — | 7.25 | 25.65 | 5,853 | 2.12 | 2.12 | (1.07 | ) | N/A | N/A | 53 | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 7.25 | (.06 | ) | 1.15 | 1.09 | — | — | — | 8.34 | 15.03 | 5,308 | 2.10 | 2.10 | (.48 | ) | N/A | N/A | 71 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 8.46 | .01 | .79 | .80 | — | — | — | 9.26 | 9.46 | † | 1 | 1.02 | †† | 1.02 | †† | .25 | †† | 4.63 | %†† | (3.36 | )%†† | 71 | |||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 8.46 | .02 | .79 | .81 | — | — | — | 9.27 | 9.57 | † | 1 | .89 | †† | .89 | †† | .39 | †† | 4.32 | †† | (3.04 | )†† | 71 | |||||||||||
OPPORTUNITY FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $22.99 | $ .01 | $(1.61 | ) | $(1.60 | ) | $ — | $.63 | $ | .63 | $20.76 | (6.24 | )% | $355,324 | 1.58 | % | 1.58 | % | .09 | % | N/A | N/A | 35 | % | |||||||||
2010 | 20.76 | .05 | 2.65 | 2.70 | — | — | — | 23.46 | 13.01 | 402,117 | 1.44 | 1.44 | .24 | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
2011 | 23.46 | .17 | .49 | .66 | .05 | — | .05 | 24.07 | 2.77 | 415,392 | 1.36 | 1.36 | .62 | N/A | N/A | 37 | |||||||||||||||||
2012 | 24.07 | .26 | 6.10 | 6.36 | .17 | .89 | 1.06 | 29.37 | 26.99 | 529,886 | 1.35 | 1.35 | .94 | N/A | N/A | 36 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 29.37 | .18 | 9.64 | 9.82 | .26 | .80 | 1.06 | 38.13 | 34.47 | 726,942 | 1.28 | 1.28 | .56 | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 20.41 | (.10 | ) | (1.47 | ) | (1.57 | ) | — | .63 | .63 | 18.21 | (6.90 | ) | 23,121 | 2.28 | 2.28 | (.61 | ) | N/A | N/A | 35 | ||||||||||||
2010 | 18.21 | (.14 | ) | 2.37 | 2.23 | — | — | — | 20.44 | 12.25 | 20,130 | 2.14 | 2.14 | (.52 | ) | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 20.44 | (.10 | ) | .52 | .42 | .01 | — | .01 | 20.85 | 2.04 | 15,025 | 2.06 | 2.06 | (.04 | ) | N/A | N/A | 37 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 20.85 | .01 | 5.31 | 5.32 | .13 | .89 | 1.02 | 25.15 | 26.12 | 13,129 | 2.05 | 2.05 | .15 | N/A | N/A | 36 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 25.15 | (.12 | ) | 8.26 | 8.14 | .22 | .80 | 1.02 | 32.27 | 33.49 | 13,677 | 2.02 | 2.02 | (.18 | ) | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 33.13 | .16 | 4.89 | 5.05 | — | — | — | 38.18 | 15.24 | † | 1 | .98 | †† | .98 | †† | .91 | †† | 4.48 | %†† | (2.59 | )%†† | 40 | |||||||||||
Institutional Class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 33.13 | .19 | 4.89 | 5.08 | — | — | — | 38.21 | 15.33 | † | 1 | .85 | †† | .85 | †† | 1.06 | †† | 4.17 | †† | (2.26 | )†† | 40 |
224 | 225 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Net Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Investment | Investment | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Income | Income | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Period | (Loss | ) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in thousands | ) | Credits | Credits | (a) | (Loss | ) | Expenses | (a) | (Loss | ) | Rate | ||||||||||||
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $20.15 | $ .03 | $(1.23 | ) | $(1.20 | ) | $.02 | $.53 | $.55 | $18.40 | (5.28 | )% | $246,063 | 1.64 | % | 1.64 | % | .22 | % | 1.82 | % | .04 | % | 55 | % | |||||||||
2010 | 18.40 | (.05 | ) | 2.31 | 2.26 | — | — | — | 20.66 | 12.28 | 274,074 | 1.52 | 1.52 | (.28 | ) | 1.65 | (.41 | ) | 64 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 20.66 | .03 | 1.03 | 1.06 | — | — | — | 21.72 | 5.13 | 285,220 | 1.44 | 1.44 | .13 | 1.54 | .03 | 73 | ||||||||||||||||||
2012 | 21.72 | .01 | 4.46 | 4.47 | .03 | 1.76 | 1.79 | 24.40 | 21.19 | 342,939 | 1.43 | 1.43 | .03 | 1.53 | (.07 | ) | 41 | |||||||||||||||||
2013 | 24.40 | .11 | 4.68 | 4.79 | .12 | 1.00 | 1.12 | 28.07 | 20.47 | 412,102 | 1.39 | 1.39 | .42 | 1.47 | .34 | 110 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 17.81 | (.10 | ) | (1.09 | ) | (1.19 | ) | — | .53 | .53 | 16.09 | (5.99 | ) | 8,856 | 2.34 | 2.34 | (.48 | ) | 2.52 | (.66 | ) | 55 | ||||||||||||
2010 | 16.09 | (.25 | ) | 2.11 | 1.86 | — | — | — | 17.95 | 11.56 | 7,577 | 2.22 | 2.22 | (.94 | ) | 2.35 | (1.07 | ) | 64 | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 17.95 | (.13 | ) | .92 | .79 | — | — | — | 18.74 | 4.40 | 5,884 | 2.14 | 2.14 | (.55 | ) | 2.24 | (.65 | ) | 73 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 18.74 | (.15 | ) | 3.84 | 3.69 | — | 1.76 | 1.76 | 20.67 | 20.33 | 5,085 | 2.13 | 2.13 | (.67 | ) | 2.23 | (.77 | ) | 41 | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 20.67 | (.10 | ) | 3.96 | 3.86 | .08 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 23.45 | 19.62 | 4,932 | 2.13 | 2.13 | (.29 | ) | 2.21 | (.37 | ) | 110 | |||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 25.71 | .01 | 2.37 | 2.38 | — | — | — | 28.09 | 9.26 | † | 1 | 1.16 | †† | 1.16 | †† | .08 | †† | 4.82 | †† | (3.58 | )†† | 110 | ||||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 25.71 | .06 | 2.37 | 2.43 | — | — | — | 28.14 | 9.45 | † | 1 | .84 | †† | .84 | †† | .42 | †† | 4.43 | †† | (3.17 | )†† | 110 | ||||||||||||
INTERNATIONAL FUND | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | $ 9.48 | $ .29 | $ (.74 | ) | $ (.45 | ) | $.13 | — | $.13 | $ 8.90 | (4.52 | )% | $107,645 | 2.20 | % | 2.20 | % | 1.16 | % | N/A | N/A | 60 | % | |||||||||||
2010 | 8.90 | .15 | 1.15 | 1.30 | .02 | — | .02 | 10.18 | 14.63 | 129,570 | 1.97 | 1.97 | 1.33 | N/A | N/A | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 10.18 | .12 | (.59 | ) | (.47 | ) | .17 | — | .17 | 9.54 | (4.70 | ) | 128,479 | 1.88 | 1.88 | 1.20 | N/A | N/A | 30 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 9.54 | .10 | 2.20 | 2.30 | .16 | — | .16 | 11.68 | 24.34 | 165,797 | 1.82 | 1.82 | .86 | N/A | N/A | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 | 11.68 | .04 | .81 | .85 | — | — | — | 12.53 | 7.28 | 215,873 | 1.71 | 1.71 | .34 | N/A | N/A | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 9.33 | .22 | (.72 | ) | (.50 | ) | .12 | — | .12 | 8.71 | (5.19 | ) | 3,401 | 2.90 | 2.90 | .46 | N/A | N/A | 60 | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 8.71 | .08 | 1.12 | 1.20 | — | — | — | 9.91 | 13.78 | 3,569 | 2.67 | 2.67 | .59 | N/A | N/A | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 9.91 | .01 | (.52 | ) | (.51 | ) | .16 | — | .16 | 9.24 | (5.30 | ) | 2,983 | 2.58 | 2.58 | .30 | N/A | N/A | 30 | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 9.24 | (.04 | ) | 2.19 | 2.15 | .14 | — | .14 | 11.25 | 23.50 | 3,328 | 2.52 | 2.52 | (.02 | ) | N/A | N/A | 41 | ||||||||||||||||
2013 | 11.25 | (.11 | ) | .84 | .73 | — | — | — | 11.98 | 6.49 | 3,200 | 2.46 | 2.46 | (.45 | ) | N/A | N/A | 31 | ||||||||||||||||
Advisor Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 12.79 | .06 | (.30 | ) | (.24 | ) | — | — | — | 12.55 | (1.88 | )† | 1 | 1.45 | †† | 1.45 | †† | .97 | †† | 5.30 | %†† | 2.88 | %†† | 31 | ||||||||||
Institutional Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013▪ | 12.79 | .08 | (.31 | ) | (.23 | ) | — | — | — | 12.56 | (1.80 | )† | 1 | 1.19 | †† | 1.19 | †† | 1.23 | †† | 4.84 | †† | (2.42 | )†† | 31 |
* | Calculated without sales charges. | ▪ | For the period April 1, 2013 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2013. | |
** | Net of expenses waived or assumed (Note 3). | (a) | The ratios do not include a reduction of expenses from cash balances maintained with the | |
† | Not annualized | custodian or from brokerage service arrangements (Note 1G). | ||
†† | Annualized | (b) | Prior to September 4, 2012, known as Value Fund. |
226 | See notes to financial statements | 227 |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
First Investors Income Funds and First Investors Equity Funds
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments of the Cash Management Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Strategic Income Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund and Fund For Income (each a series of First Investors Income Funds), and the Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund, Growth & Income Fund, Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund and International Fund (each a series of First Investors Equity Funds), as of September 30, 2013, the related statements of operations, the statements of changes in net assets, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated thereon. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform an audit of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of September 30, 2013, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. Where brokers have not replied to our confirmation requests, we have carried out other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
228 |
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Cash Management Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Strategic Income Fund, International Opportunities Bond Fund, Fund For Income, Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund, Growth & Income Fund, Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund and International Fund, as of September 30, 2013, and the results of their operations, changes in their net assets, and their financial highlights for the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Tait, Weller & Baker LLP |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
November 26, 2013
229 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Annual Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreement with Muzinich & Co., Inc.
The First Investors Income Funds’ (the “Trust”) investment advisory agreements with the Trust’s investment adviser and, as applicable, sub-adviser, on behalf of each of the Trust’s funds, can remain in effect after an initial term of no greater than two years only if they are renewed at least annually thereafter (i) by the vote of the Trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of each fund and (ii) by the vote of a majority of the Trustees who are not parties to the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreement, as applicable) or “interested persons” of any party thereto (the “Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called specifically for the purpose of voting on such approval.
The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) has four regularly scheduled and two informal meetings each year and takes into account throughout the year matters bearing on the approval of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreement, as applicable). The Board and its standing committees also consider at each meeting factors that are relevant to the annual renewal of each fund’s advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreement, as applicable), including the services and support provided to each fund and its shareholders.
On April 18, 2013 (the “April Meeting”), the Independent Trustees met in person with First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”), the Trust’s investment adviser, Trust counsel, independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees (“Independent Legal Counsel”) and others to give preliminary consideration to information bearing on the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreement, as applicable) with respect to each fund. The primary purpose of the April Meeting was to ensure that the Independent Trustees had ample opportunity to consider matters they deemed relevant in considering the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreement, as applicable), and to request any additional information they considered reasonably necessary to their deliberations. The Independent Trustees also met in executive session with Independent Legal Counsel to consider the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreement, as applicable) outside the presence of management. As part of the April Meeting, the Independent Trustees asked FIMCO to respond to certain additional questions prior to the contract approval meeting of the Board to be held on May 16, 2013 (the “May Meeting”).
At the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) between FIMCO and each of the following funds (each a “Fund” and collectively the “Funds”): Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Fund For Income and Cash
230 |
Management Fund. In addition, at the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Muzinich & Co., Inc. (“Muzinich”) with respect to the Fund For Income.
In reaching its decisions to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreement for the Fund For Income, the Board considered information furnished and discussed throughout the year at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings as well as information provided specifically in relation to the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement for the April Meeting and May Meeting. Information furnished at Board and/or Committee meetings throughout the year included FIMCO’s analysis of each Fund’s investment performance, presentations given by representatives of FIMCO and Muzinich and various reports on compliance and other services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates. In preparation for the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, the Independent Trustees requested and received information compiled by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, that included, among other things: (1) the investment performance over various time periods and the fees and expenses of each Fund as compared to a comparable group of funds as determined by Lipper (“Peer Group”); and (2) comparative information on each Fund’s volatility versus total return. Additionally, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, FIMCO furnished, and the Board considered, information concerning various aspects of its operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates to the Funds, including investment advisory and administrative services to the Funds including, as applicable, oversight services with respect to the sub-adviser; (2) the actual management fees paid by each Fund to FIMCO; (3) the costs of providing services to each Fund and the profitability of FIMCO and its affiliate, Administrative Data Management Corp. (“ADM”), the Funds’ affiliated transfer agent, from the relationship with each Fund; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to FIMCO or its affiliates as a result of the relationship with each Fund. FIMCO also provided, and the Board considered, an analysis of the overall profitability of the First Investors mutual fund business that included various entities affiliated with FIMCO as well as comparative profitability information based on analysis performed by FIMCO of the financial statements of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers. The Board also considered information provided by FIMCO on management’s initiatives for increasing Fund assets, more aggressively marketing the Funds and taking steps wherever possible to reduce expenses and improve performance of the Funds. In addition to evaluating, among other things,
231 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
the written information provided by FIMCO, the Board also evaluated the answers to questions posed by the Board to representatives of FIMCO.
In addition, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, Muzinich furnished, and the Board reviewed, information concerning various aspects of its operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by Muzinich to the Fund For Income; (2) the sub-advisory fee rates charged by Muzinich and a comparison of those fee rates to the fee rates of Muzinich for providing advisory services to other investment companies or accounts with an investment mandate similar to the Fund For Income; (3) profitability and/or financial information provided by Muzinich; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to Muzinich as a result of the relationship with the Fund For Income.
In considering the information and materials described above, the Independent Trustees took into account management style, investment strategies and prevailing market conditions. Moreover, the Independent Trustees received assistance from and met separately with Independent Legal Counsel during both the April Meeting and May Meeting and were provided with a written description of their statutory responsibilities and the legal standards that are applicable to approvals of advisory agreements (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable). Although the Advisory Agreement for all of the Funds and the Sub-Advisory Agreement for the Fund For Income were considered at the same Board meeting, the Independent Trustees addressed each Fund separately during the April Meeting and May Meeting.
Based on all of the information presented, the Board, including a majority of its Independent Trustees, determined on a Fund-by-Fund basis that the fees charged under the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement are reasonable in relation to the services that are provided under each Agreement. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance in reaching its conclusions and determinations with respect to the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreement. Although not meant to be all-inclusive, the following describes some of the factors that were considered by the Board in deciding to approve the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreement with Muzinich.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In examining the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by FIMCO, the Board recognized that FIMCO is dedicated to providing investment management services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund
232 |
complex and that, unlike many other mutual fund managers, FIMCO is not in the business of providing management services to hedge funds, pension funds or private accounts. As a result, the Board considered that FIMCO’s personnel devote substantially all of their time to serving the funds in the First Investors fund complex. The Board also considered management’s explanation regarding the significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders.
The Board noted that FIMCO has undertaken extensive responsibilities as manager of the Funds, including: (1) the provision of investment advice to the Funds; (2) implementing policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with each Fund’s investment objectives and policies; (3) the review of brokerage arrangements; (4) oversight of general portfolio compliance with applicable laws; (5) the provision of certain administrative services to the Funds, including fund accounting; (6) the implementation of Board directives as they relate to the Funds; and (7) evaluating and monitoring any sub-advisers on an ongoing basis including, but not limited to, monitoring each sub-adviser’s investment performance, evaluating each sub-adviser’s compliance program on an annual basis and monitoring investments for compliance purposes. The Board noted that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but historically has provided certain administrative personnel and services that many other advisers do not provide without imposition of separate fees. The Board also noted the steps that FIMCO has taken to encourage strong performance, including providing significant incentives to portfolio managers and analysts based on Fund performance. In addition, the Board considered information regarding the overall financial strength of FIMCO and its affiliates and the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided to the Funds.
The Board also considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by FIMCO’s affiliates, including transfer agency and distribution services. The Board took into account the fact that ADM is dedicated to providing transfer agency services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex. As a result, ADM can tailor its processes and services to satisfy the needs of the Funds’ shareholder base. The Board noted that the Funds’ shares are distributed primarily through First Investors Corporation (“FIC”), which is an affiliate of FIMCO.
Furthermore, the Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the investment management services provided by Muzinich to the Fund For Income. The Board considered Muzinich’s investment management process in managing the Fund For Income and the experience and capability of its personnel responsible for the portfolio
233 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
management of the Fund For Income. The Board also considered information regarding the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided by Muzinich.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to each Fund by FIMCO and the Fund For Income by Muzinich were consistent with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, as applicable, and supported approval of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement.
Investment Performance
The Board placed significant emphasis on the investment performance of each of the Funds. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions held at prior Board or Committee meetings, as applicable, particular attention was given to the performance information compiled by Lipper. In particular, the Board reviewed the performance of the Funds over the most recent calendar year (“1-year period”) and the annualized performance over the most recent three calendar year period (“3-year period”) and five calendar year period (“5-year period”). In addition, the Board considered the performance information provided by FIMCO for each Fund through April 30, 2013 (the “year-to-date period”). The Board also reviewed the annual yield of each Fund for each of the past five calendar years. With regard to the performance and yield information, the Board considered the performance and yield of each Fund on a percentile and quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group. For purposes of the data provided, the first quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the highest performance or yield, as applicable, and the fifth quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the lowest performance or yield.
On a Fund-by-Fund basis, the performance reports indicated, and the Board noted, that the Fund For Income and Investment Grade Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for at least one of the performance periods provided by Lipper. The Board also noted that the yield for the Investment Grade Fund and Government Fund for each of the past five calendar years fell within one of the top three quintiles, the yield for the Fund For Income for three of the past five calendar years fell within one of the top three quintiles and the yield for the Cash Management Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for one of the past five calendar years. Moreover, the Board considered the volatility versus total return data provided by Lipper as well as FIMCO’s representation that it believes that the Funds use a more conservative investment style than many of their peers. The Trustees also considered that, in the current market and interest-rate environment, comparative information regarding performance and fees of money market funds such as the Cash Management Fund is of relatively limited utility.
234 |
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the investment performance of each Fund was either (a) acceptable or better, or (b) subject to reasonable steps to monitor or address underperformance.
Fund Expenses, Costs of Services, Economies of Scale and Related Benefits
Management Fees and Expenses. The Board also gave substantial consideration to the fees payable under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement as well as under the Sub-Advisory Agreement for the Fund For Income.
The Board reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s contractual management fee rate (at common asset levels) and actual management fee rate (which included the effect of any fee waivers) as a percentage of average net assets to other funds in its Peer Group. In this regard, the Board considered the contractual and actual management fees of each Fund on a quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group and noted the relative position of each Fund within the Peer Group. The Board also considered that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but also certain administrative personnel to the Funds under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement and that many other advisers do not provide such administrative personnel under their advisory agreements and that FIMCO also provides certain administrative services without the imposition of a separate fee. The Board considered that FIMCO informed the Board that it intends to: (i) extend, on a voluntary basis, the existing total expense cap limitation for the Cash Management Fund until May 31, 2014; and (ii) extend, on a voluntary basis, the existing management fee caps for the Fund For Income, Government Fund and Investment Grade Fund until May 31, 2014. The Board also considered that FIMCO agreed to an additional waiver of two basis points on the Government Fund until at least December 31, 2013, with such waiver remaining in place until May 31, 2014 if the Fund’s performance is below the median of its Peer Group as of December 31, 2013. The Board also considered that, with respect to the Cash Management Fund, FIMCO was waiving 100% of its management fees and reimbursing a portion of other expenses to avoid a negative return for shareholders due to the extraordinarily low interest rate environment.
In considering the sub-advisory fee rates charged by and costs and profitability of Muzinich with regard to the Fund For Income, the Board noted that FIMCO pays Muzinich a sub-advisory fee from its own advisory fee rather than the Fund paying Muzinich a fee directly. Muzinich provided, and the Board reviewed, information comparing the fees charged by Muzinich for services to the Fund For Income versus the fee rates of Muzinich for providing advisory services to other comparable investment companies or accounts. Based on a review of this information, the Board noted that the fees charged by Muzinich for services to the Fund For Income
235 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
appeared competitive to the fees Muzinich charges to its other comparable investment companies or accounts.
The Board also reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s Class A share total expense ratio, taking into account FIMCO’s expense waivers (as applicable), and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees (i.e., fees other than management, transfer agency and 12b-1/non-12b-1 fees) to other funds in its Peer Group, including on a quintile basis. In considering the level of the total expense ratio and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees, the Board took into account management’s explanation that: (i) there are significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders; (ii) overall Fund expenses cover certain check-writing and wiring privileges for Cash Management Fund shareholders at no additional cost; (iii) the average account size of many of the First Investors funds is small by comparison to the industry average account size; and (iv) Lipper expense comparisons do not take into account the size of a fund complex, and as a result, in most cases the First Investors funds are compared to funds in complexes that are much larger than First Investors. The Board also considered that the Funds will begin charging retirement custodial fees at the individual shareholder level rather than being paid by the Funds going forward and that this would result in total expenses of each Fund being reduced by several basis points. The Board also noted that Lipper’s customized expense groups tend to be fairly small in number and the funds included in the Peer Group generally change from year to year, thereby introducing an element of randomness that affects comparative results each year. While recognizing the limitations inherent in Lipper’s methodology, the Board believed that the data provided by Lipper was a generally appropriate measure of comparative expenses.
The foregoing comparisons assisted the Trustees by providing them with a basis for evaluating each Fund’s management fee and expense ratio on a relative basis.
Profitability. The Board reviewed the materials it received from FIMCO regarding its revenues and costs in providing investment management and certain administrative services to the Funds. In particular, the Board considered the analysis of FIMCO’s profitability with respect to each Fund, calculated for the year ended December 31, 2012, as well as overall profitability information relating to the past five calendar years. The Board also considered the information provided by FIMCO comparing the profitability of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers as analyzed by FIMCO based on publicly available financial statements. In reviewing the profitability information, the Board also considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO and its affiliates as a result of their relationship with the
236 |
Funds, which are discussed below. The Board acknowledged that, as a business matter, FIMCO was entitled to earn reasonable profits for its services to the Funds. Based on the information provided, the Board also noted that FIMCO operates the Cash Management Fund at a loss. The Board also considered the profitability and/or financial information provided by Muzinich.
Economies of Scale. With respect to whether economies of scale are realized by FIMCO as a Fund’s assets increase and the extent to which any economies of scale are reflected in the level of management fee rates charged, the Board considered that the Advisory Agreement fee schedule for each Fund, except the Cash Management Fund, includes breakpoints to account for management economies of scale. With respect to the Cash Management Fund, the Board concluded that the fee structure is appropriate at current asset levels.
“Fall Out” or Ancillary Benefits. The Board considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO and Muzinich as a result of their relationship with the Funds. The Board considered the profits earned or losses incurred by ADM and the income received by FIC as a result of FIMCO’s management of the First Investors funds. The Board also considered the fact that Muzinich does not engage in any soft dollar arrangements.
* * * |
In summary, based on all relevant information and factors, none of which was individually determinative of the outcome, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement with Muzinich.
Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreement with Muzinich & Co., Inc. with respect to the First Investors Floating Rate Fund
At the May 16, 2013 meeting (the “May Meeting”) of the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of the First Investors Income Funds (the “Trust”), the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, discussed and approved, for the new First Investors Floating Rate Fund (the “New Fund”), the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) with First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”) and the sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Muzinich & Co., Inc. (“Muzinich,” and together with FIMCO, the “Advisers”).
237 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
The Trustees were provided with detailed materials relating to the New Fund and Advisers in advance of and at the May Meeting. The material factors and conclusions that formed the basis for the approval of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement are discussed below. In addition, the Trustees met in person with FIMCO, Muzinich, Trust counsel, independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees (“Independent Legal Counsel”) and others to receive information on, and discuss the approval of, the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement.
In making their determinations, the Trustees took into account management style, investment strategies, investment philosophy and process, Muzinich’s past performance, Muzinich’s personnel that would be serving the New Fund, and prevailing market conditions. In evaluating the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Trustees also reviewed information provided by the Advisers, including the terms of such Agreements and information regarding fee arrangements, including the structure of the advisory and sub-advisory fees, that FIMCO will pay Muzinich out of FIMCO’s advisory fees, the method of computing fees, and the frequency of payment of fees. The Trustees also reviewed information comparing the New Fund’s advisory fee and total expenses with a peer group of other similar funds. In addition, the Trustees reviewed, among other things, information regarding Muzinich’s compliance program, financial condition, insurance coverage and brokerage practices.
After extensive discussion and consideration among themselves, and with the Advisers, Trust counsel and Independent Legal Counsel, including during an executive session with Independent Legal Counsel held the previous day, the Trustees concluded the following with respect to the New Fund:
• The nature and extent of the investment advisory services to be provided to the Fund by the Advisers were consistent with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement, respectively.
• The prospects for satisfactory investment performance of the New Fund were reasonable;
• Shareholders of the New Fund may benefit from economies of scale in the future as assets grow due to breakpoints included in the fee schedule for the Advisory Agreement;
238 |
• The cost of services to be provided by the Advisers to the New Fund and the profits to be realized by the Advisers and their affiliates from their relationship with the New Fund would be assessed after a reasonable period of New Fund operations; and
• FIMCO may receive certain “fall out” or ancillary benefits by obtaining research and other services from broker-dealers that execute brokerage transactions for the New Fund.
* * * |
Based on all relevant information and factors, none of which was individually determinative of the outcome, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, concluded that the approval of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement was in the best interests of the New Fund and its shareholders and unanimously approved such Agreements.
239 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Annual Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreements and the Sub-Advisory Agreements with Wellington Management Company, LLP, Paradigm Capital Management, Inc., Smith Group Asset Management, LP and Vontobel Asset Management, Inc.
The First Investors Equity Funds’ (the “Trust”) investment advisory agreements with the Trust’s investment adviser and, as applicable, sub-advisers, on behalf of each of the Trust’s funds, can remain in effect after an initial term of no greater than two years only if they are renewed at least annually thereafter (i) by the vote of the Trustees or by a vote of the shareholders of each fund and (ii) by the vote of a majority of the Trustees who are not parties to the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) or “interested persons” of any party thereto (the “Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called specifically for the purpose of voting on such approval.
The Board of Trustees (the “Board”) has four regularly scheduled and two informal meetings each year and takes into account throughout the year matters bearing on the approval of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable). The Board and its standing committees also consider at each meeting factors that are relevant to the annual renewal of each fund’s advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable), including the services and support provided to each fund and its shareholders.
On April 18, 2013 (the “April Meeting”), the Independent Trustees met in person with First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”), the Trust’s investment adviser, Trust counsel, independent legal counsel to the Independent Trustees (“Independent Legal Counsel”) and others to give preliminary consideration to information bearing on the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) with respect to each fund. The primary purpose of the April Meeting was to ensure that the Independent Trustees had ample opportunity to consider matters they deemed relevant in considering the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable), and to request any additional information they considered reasonably necessary to their deliberations. The Independent Trustees also met in executive session with Independent Legal Counsel to consider the continuation of the advisory agreement (or sub-advisory agreements, as applicable) outside the presence of management. As part of the April Meeting, the Independent Trustees asked FIMCO to respond to certain additional questions prior to the contract approval meeting of the Board to be held on May 16, 2013 (the “May Meeting”).
At the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) between FIMCO and each of the following funds (each a “Fund” and
240 |
collectively the “Funds”): Growth & Income Fund, Total Return Fund, Equity Income Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund, Select Growth Fund, Global Fund and International Fund. In addition, at the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the sub-advisory agreements (each a “Sub-Advisory Agreement” and collectively the “Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with: (1) Wellington Management Company, LLP (“WMC”) with respect to the Global Fund; (2) Paradigm Capital Management, Inc. (“Paradigm”) with respect to the Special Situations Fund; (3) Smith Group Asset Management, LP (“Smith Group”) with respect to the Select Growth Fund; and (4) Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. (“Vontobel”) with respect to the International Fund. The Global Fund, Special Situations Fund, Select Growth Fund and International Fund are collectively referred to as the “Sub-Advised Funds.”
In reaching its decisions to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds, the Board considered information furnished and discussed throughout the year at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings as well as information provided specifically in relation to the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements for the April Meeting and May Meeting. Information furnished at Board and/or Committee meetings throughout the year included FIMCO’s analysis of each Fund’s investment performance, presentations given by representatives of FIMCO, WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel and various reports on compliance and other services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates. In preparation for the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, the Independent Trustees requested and received information compiled by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, that included, among other things: (1) the investment performance over various time periods and the fees and expenses of each Fund as compared to a comparable group of funds as determined by Lipper (“Peer Group”); and (2) comparative information on each Fund’s volatility versus total return. Additionally, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, FIMCO furnished, and the Board considered, information concerning various aspects of its operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates to the Funds, including investment advisory and administrative services to the Funds including, as applicable, oversight services with respect to the sub-advisers; (2) the actual management fees paid by each Fund to FIMCO; (3) the costs of providing services to each Fund and the profitability of FIMCO and its affiliate, Administrative Data Management Corp. (“ADM”), the Funds’ affiliated transfer agent, from the relationship with each Fund; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to FIMCO or its affiliates as a result of the relationship with each Fund. FIMCO also provided, and the Board considered, an
241 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
analysis of the overall profitability of the First Investors mutual fund business that included various entities affiliated with FIMCO as well as comparative profitability information based on analysis performed by FIMCO of the financial statements of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers. The Board also considered information provided by FIMCO on management’s initiatives for increasing Fund assets, more aggressively marketing the Funds and taking steps wherever possible to reduce expenses and improve performance of the Funds. In addition to evaluating, among other things, the written information provided by FIMCO, the Board also evaluated the answers to questions posed by the Board to representatives of FIMCO.
In addition, in response to specific requests from the Independent Trustees in connection with the April Meeting and/or May Meeting, WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel furnished, and the Board reviewed, information concerning various aspects of their respective operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (2) the sub-advisory fee rates charged by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel and a comparison of those fee rates to the fee rates of WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel for providing advisory services to other investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable, with an investment mandate similar to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (3) profitability and/or financial information provided by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel as a result of the relationship with each applicable Sub-Advised Fund.
In considering the information and materials described above, the Independent Trustees took into account management style, investment strategies and prevailing market conditions. Moreover, the Independent Trustees received assistance from and met separately with Independent Legal Counsel during both the April Meeting and May Meeting and were provided with a written description of their statutory responsibilities and the legal standards that are applicable to approvals of advisory agreements (and sub-advisory agreements, as applicable). Although the Advisory Agreement for all of the Funds and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds were considered at the same Board meeting, the Independent Trustees addressed each Fund separately during the April Meeting and May Meeting.
Based on all of the information presented, the Board, including a majority of its Independent Trustees, determined on a Fund-by-Fund basis that the fees charged under the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement are reasonable in relation to the services that are provided under each Agreement. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance in reaching its conclusions and
242 |
determinations with respect to the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreements. Although not meant to be all-inclusive, the following describes some of the factors that were considered by the Board in deciding to approve the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreements with Paradigm, Smith Group, Vontobel and WMC.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In examining the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by FIMCO, the Board recognized that FIMCO is dedicated to providing investment management services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex and that, unlike many other mutual fund managers, FIMCO is not in the business of providing management services to hedge funds, pension funds or private accounts. As a result, the Board considered that FIMCO’s personnel devote substantially all of their time to serving the funds in the First Investors fund complex. The Board also considered management’s explanation regarding the significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders.
The Board noted that FIMCO has undertaken extensive responsibilities as manager of the Funds, including: (1) the provision of investment advice to the Funds; (2) implementing policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with each Fund’s investment objectives and policies; (3) the review of brokerage arrangements; (4) oversight of general portfolio compliance with applicable laws; (5) the provision of certain administrative services to the Funds, including fund accounting; (6) the implementation of Board directives as they relate to the Funds; and (7) evaluating and monitoring any sub-advisers on an ongoing basis including, but not limited to, monitoring each sub-adviser’s investment performance, evaluating each sub-adviser’s compliance program on an annual basis and monitoring investments for compliance purposes. The Board noted that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but historically has provided certain administrative personnel and services that many other advisers do not provide without imposition of separate fees. The Board also noted the steps that FIMCO has taken to encourage strong performance, including providing significant incentives to portfolio managers and analysts based on Fund performance. In addition, the Board considered information regarding the overall financial strength of FIMCO and its affiliates and the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided to the Funds.
The Board also considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by FIMCO’s affiliates, including transfer agency and distribution services. The Board took into account the fact that ADM is dedicated to providing transfer
243 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
agency services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex. As a result, ADM can tailor its processes and services to satisfy the needs of the Funds’ shareholder base. The Board noted that the Funds’ shares are distributed primarily through First Investors Corporation (“FIC”), which is an affiliate of FIMCO.
Furthermore, the Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the investment management services provided by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Board considered WMC’s, Paradigm’s, Smith Group’s and Vontobel’s investment management process in managing the applicable Sub-Advised Funds and the experience and capability of their respective personnel responsible for the portfolio management of the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Board also considered information regarding the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided by each sub-adviser.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to each Fund by FIMCO and the applicable Sub-Advised Funds by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel were appropriate and consistent with the terms of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements, as applicable, and supported approval of the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
Investment Performance
The Board placed significant emphasis on the investment performance of each of the Funds. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions held at prior Board or Committee meetings, as applicable, particular attention was given to the performance information compiled by Lipper. In particular, the Board reviewed the performance of the Funds over the most recent calendar year (“1-year period”) and the annualized performance over the most recent three calendar year period (“3-year period”) and five calendar year period (“5-year period”). In addition, the Board considered the performance information provided by FIMCO for each Fund through April 30, 2013 (the “year-to-date period”). With regard to the performance information, the Board considered the performance of each Fund on a percentile and quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group. For purposes of the performance data provided, the first quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the highest performance and the fifth quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the lowest performance.
On a Fund-by-Fund basis, the performance reports indicated, and the Board noted, that each Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for at least one of the performance periods provided by Lipper. With regard to the Equity Income Fund, the Board also
244 |
noted that FIMCO changed the portfolio manager for the Fund in November 2011 and changed the Fund’s name from Value Fund to Equity Income Fund in September 2012 and that the changes implemented by the new portfolio manager have led to improved performance over the past seven months. The Board also noted that although the Global Fund’s performance over the 1-year period was in one of the top three quintiles, longer term performance was not. The Board considered FIMCO representations that it was monitoring the Global Fund’s performance and would report back to the Board at its next meeting. The Board also considered the volatility versus total return data provided by Lipper as well as FIMCO’s representation that it believes that the Funds use a more conservative investment style than many of their peers.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the investment performance of each Fund was either (a) acceptable or better, or (b) subject to reasonable steps to monitor or address underperformance.
Fund Expenses, Costs of Services, Economies of Scale and Related Benefits
Management Fees and Expenses. The Board also gave substantial consideration to the fees payable under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement as well as under the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds.
The Board reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s contractual management fee rate (at common asset levels) and actual management fee rate (which included the effect of any fee waivers) as a percentage of average net assets to other funds in its Peer Group. In this regard, the Board considered the contractual and actual management fees of each Fund on a quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group and noted the relative position of each Fund within the Peer Group. The Board also considered that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but also certain administrative personnel to the Funds under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement and that many other advisers do not provide such administrative personnel under their advisory agreements and that FIMCO also provides certain administrative services without the imposition of a separate fee. The Board also considered that FIMCO informed the Board that it intends to extend, on a voluntary basis, the existing management fee cap for the Special Situations Fund until May 31, 2014 and waive management fees in excess of a cap on the Global Fund until May 31, 2014. The Board also noted that FIMCO proposed lowering the contractual management fees for the Total Return Fund to take advantage of wholesale distribution opportunities.
In considering the sub-advisory fee rates charged by and costs and profitability of WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel with regard to the respective Sub-Advised Funds, the Board noted that FIMCO pays WMC, Paradigm, Smith
245 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Group or Vontobel, as the case may be, a sub-advisory fee from its own advisory fee rather than each Fund paying WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group or Vontobel a fee directly. WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel provided, and the Board reviewed, information comparing the fees charged by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel for services to the respective Sub-Advised Funds versus the fee rates of WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel for providing advisory services to other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable. Based on a review of this information, the Board noted that the fees charged by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel, as the case may be, for services to each applicable Sub-Advised Fund appeared competitive to the fees WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel charge to their other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable.
The Board also reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s Class A share total expense ratio, taking into account FIMCO’s expense waivers (as applicable), and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees (i.e., fees other than management, transfer agency and 12b-1/non-12b-1 fees) to other funds in its Peer Group, including on a quintile basis. In considering the level of the total expense ratio and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees, the Board took into account management’s explanation that: (i) the Funds have average account sizes that are relatively small compared with the industry average for equity funds; (ii) there are significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders; and (iii) Lipper expense comparisons do not take into account the size of a fund complex, and as a result, in certain cases the First Investors funds are compared to funds in complexes that are much larger than First Investors. The Board also considered that the Funds will begin charging retirement custodial fees at the individual shareholder level rather than being paid by the Funds going forward and that this would result in total expenses of each Fund being reduced by several basis points. The Board also noted that Lipper’s customized expense groups tend to be fairly small in number and the funds included in the Peer Group generally change from year to year, thereby introducing an element of randomness that affects comparative results each year. While recognizing the limitations inherent in Lipper’s methodology, the Board believed that the data provided by Lipper was a generally appropriate measure of comparative expenses.
The foregoing comparisons assisted the Trustees by providing them with a basis for evaluating each Fund’s management fee and expense ratio on a relative basis.
246 |
Profitability. The Board reviewed the materials it received from FIMCO regarding its revenues and costs in providing investment management and certain administrative services to the Funds. In particular, the Board considered the analysis of FIMCO’s profitability with respect to each Fund, calculated for the year ended December 31, 2012, as well as overall profitability information relating to the past five calendar years. The Board also considered the information provided by FIMCO comparing the profitability of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers as analyzed by FIMCO based on publicly available financial statements. In reviewing the profitability information, the Board also considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO and its affiliates as a result of their relationship with the Funds, which are discussed below. The Board acknowledged that, as a business matter, FIMCO was entitled to earn reasonable profits for its services to the Funds. The Board also considered the profitability and/or financial information provided by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel.
Economies of Scale. With respect to whether economies of scale are realized by FIMCO as a Fund’s assets increase and the extent to which any economies of scale are reflected in the level of management fee rates charged, the Board considered that the Advisory Agreement fee schedule for each Fund includes breakpoints to account for management economies of scale.
“Fall Out” or Ancillary Benefits. The Board considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO, WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel as a result of their relationship with the Funds. In that regard, the Board considered the fact that FIMCO, WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel receive research from broker-dealers that execute brokerage transactions for the funds in the First Investors fund complex. However, the Board noted that FIMCO and the sub-advisers must select brokers based on each Fund’s requirements for seeking best execution. The Board also considered that Paradigm executes brokerage transactions for the Special Situations Fund through the use of an affiliated broker-dealer and that this also provides a source of fall-out benefits to Paradigm. The Board considered the profits earned or losses incurred by ADM and the income received by FIC as a result of FIMCO’s management of the First Investors funds.
* * * |
In summary, based on all relevant information and factors, none of which was individually determinative of the outcome, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
247 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Trustees and Officers*
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position(s) | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
——————— | ———— | ———— | ————— | ——— |
DISINTERESTED TRUSTEES | ||||
Susan E. Artmann (1954) | Trustee | Since 11/1/12 | 40 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
None/Retired. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of HSBC Insurance North America | ||||
(2012-September 2013); Executive Vice President and President (2008-2011) and Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(2000-2008) of HSBC Taxpayer Financial Services. | ||||
Mary J. Barneby (1952) | Trustee | Since 11/1/12 | 40 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Executive Officer, Girl Scouts of Connecticut (since October 2012); Executive Director of UBS Financial | ||||
Services, Inc. and Head of Stamford Private Wealth Office (2002-2012). | ||||
Charles R. Barton, III (1965) | Trustee | Since 1/1/06 | 40 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chief Operating Officer (since 2007), Board Director (since 1989, currently Ex-Officio) and Trustee (since 1994) | ||||
of The Barton Group/Barton Mines Corporation (mining and industrial abrasives distribution); President of Noe | ||||
Pierson Corporation (land holding and management services provider) (since 2004). |
248 |
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position(s) | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
——————— | ———— | ———— | ————— | ——— |
DISINTERESTED TRUSTEES (continued) | ||||
Arthur M. Scutro, Jr. (1941) | Trustee and | Trustee since | 40 | None |
c/o First Investors | Chairman | 1/1/06 and | ||
Legal Department | Chairman | |||
40 Wall Street | since 1/1/13 | |||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
None/Retired | ||||
Mark R. Ward (1952) | Trustee | Since 1/1/10 | 40 | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Self-employed, consultant (since 2008); Senior Partner, Ernst & Young, LLP, Leader, Mid-Atlantic Asset | ||||
Management Practice (2003-2007). |
*Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term with the Funds, until his/her successor is elected.
249 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Trustees and Officers* (continued)
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position(s) | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
——————— | ———— | ———— | ————— | ——— |
OFFICER(S) WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES | ||||
Derek Burke (1963) | President | Since 2012 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors Management | ||||
Company, Inc. | ||||
Raritan Plaza I | ||||
Edison, NJ 08837 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Director (since 2012) and President (since 2011) of First Investors Management Company, Inc., and Admin- | ||||
istrative Data Management Corp.; Board of Managers and Chief Executive Officer of First Investors Advisory | ||||
Services, LLC (since 2012); Consultant, Burke Consulting (2010-2011); UBS - Managing Director, Co-Head of | ||||
Investment Solutions (2009-2010) and Managing Director, Head of Institutional, Retirement and Fund Services | ||||
(2004-2009). | ||||
Joseph I. Benedek (1957) | Treasurer | Since 1988 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors Management | ||||
Company, Inc. | ||||
Raritan Plaza I | ||||
Edison, NJ 08837 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Treasurer of First Investors Management Company, Inc. | ||||
Mary Carty (1950) | Secretary | Since 2010 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors | ||||
Legal Department | ||||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
General Counsel of First Investors Management Company, Inc. and various affiliated companies since December | ||||
2012; Assistant Counsel of First Investors Management Company, Inc., (2010-2012). Special Counsel and | ||||
Associate at Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP (1998-2009). |
250 |
Length of | ||||
Time Served | Number of | Other | ||
Position(s) | (including with | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Held with | Predecessor | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address | Funds | Funds) | Overseen | Held |
——————— | ———— | ———— | ————— | ——— |
OFFICER(S) WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES (continued) | ||||
Marc S. Milgram (1957) | Chief | Since 2010 | N/A | None |
c/o First Investors | Compliance | |||
Legal Department | Officer | |||
40 Wall Street | ||||
New York, NY 10005 | ||||
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: | ||||
Investment Compliance Manager of First Investors Management Company, Inc., (2009-2010); First Investors | ||||
Federal Savings Bank, President (2000-2011), Treasurer (1987-2011) and Director (2004-2011); First Investors | ||||
Corporation, Vice President (2008-2009); Administrative Data Management Corp., Vice President (2008-2009); | ||||
and First Investors Name Saver, Inc. f/k/a/ School Financial Management Services, Inc., Treasurer (since 1992). |
251 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Shareholder Information | ||
Investment Adviser | Underwriter | |
First Investors Management | First Investors Corporation | |
Company, Inc. | 40 Wall Street | |
40 Wall Street | New York, NY 10005 | |
New York, NY 10005 | ||
Custodian | ||
Subadviser | (Income Funds except Strategic Income | |
(International Opportunities Bond Fund) | Fund and International Opportunities | |
Brandywine Global Investment | Bond Fund) | |
Management, LLC | The Bank of New York Mellon | |
2929 Arch Street | One Wall Street | |
Philadelphia, PA 19104 | New York, NY 10286 | |
Subadviser | Custodian | |
(Fund For Income) | (Strategic Income Fund, International | |
Muzinich & Co., Inc. | Opportunities Bond Fund and the | |
450 Park Avenue | Equity Funds) | |
New York, NY 10022 | Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. | |
50 Post Office Square | ||
Subadviser | Boston, MA 02110 | |
(Global Fund) | ||
Wellington Management Company, LLP | Transfer Agent | |
280 Congress Street | Administrative Data Management Corp. | |
Boston, MA 02210 | Raritan Plaza I – 8th Floor | |
Edison, NJ 08837-3620 | ||
Subadviser | ||
(Select Growth Fund) | Independent Registered Public | |
Smith Asset Management Group, L.P. | Accounting Firm | |
100 Crescent Court | Tait, Weller & Baker LLP | |
Dallas, TX 75201 | 1818 Market Street — 24th Floor | |
Philadelphia, PA 19103 | ||
Subadviser | ||
(International Fund) | Legal Counsel | |
Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. | K&L Gates LLP | |
1540 Broadway, 38th Floor | 1601 K Street, N.W. | |
New York, NY 10036 | Washington, D.C. 20006 |
252 |
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to vote proxies relating to a portfolio’s securities is available, without charge, upon request by calling toll free 1-800-423-4026 or can be viewed online or downloaded from the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) internet website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available, without charge, upon request in writing or by calling 1-800-423-4026 and on the SEC’s internet website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Funds file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC on Form N-Q for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Funds’ Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; and may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The schedule of portfolio holdings is available, without charge, upon request in writing or by calling 1-800-423-4026.
253 |
NOTES
254 |
NOTES
255 |
NOTES
256 |
NOTES
257 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics
As of September 30, 2013, the Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer. On October 30, 2013 revisions were made to the code of ethics to reflect our new 40 Wall Street address on the certification forms.
For the year ended September 30, 2013, there were no waivers granted from a provision of the code of ethics.
A copy of the Registrant's code of ethics is filed under Item 12(a)(1).
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
During the reporting period the Registrant's Board determined that it had at least one "audit committee financial expert" serving on its audit committee. Arthur M. Scutro, Jr. and Mark R. Ward were the "audit committee financial experts" during all or part of the period and were considered to be "independent" as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Fiscal Year Ended | ||||
September 30, | ||||
----------------- | ||||
2013 | 2012 | |||
---- | ---- | |||
(a) Audit Fees | ||||
First Investors Income Funds | $145,700 | $118,750 | ||
(b) Audit-Related Fees | ||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ 0 | $ 0 | ||
(c) Tax Fees | ||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ 26,000 | $ 20,000 | ||
Nature of services: tax returns preparation and tax compliance | ||||
(d) All Other Fees | ||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ 0 | $ 0 |
(e)(1) Audit committee's pre-approval policies
The Charter of the Audit Committee requires the Audit Committee (a) to pre-approve, and to recommend to the full Board, the selection, retention or termination of the independent auditors to provide audit, review or attest services to the First Investors Funds (“Funds”) and, in connection therewith, evaluate the independence of the auditors and to obtain the auditors’ specific representations as to their independence; (b) to pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided to the Funds by the independent auditor; and (c) to pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided by the Funds’ independent auditor to the Funds’ investment adviser or to any entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Funds’ investment adviser and that provides ongoing services to the Funds, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds. The Audit Committee has not adopted pre-approval policies or procedures to permit the services in (b) and (c) above to be pre-approved by other means.
(e)(2) None, or 0%, of the services relating to the Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees paid by the Registrant and Related Entities disclosed above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (which permits audit committee approval after the start of the engagement with respect to services other than audit review or attest services, if certain conditions are satisfied).
(f) Not Applicable
(g) Aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Registrant's accountant for services rendered to the Registrant and the Registrant's investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant for the two fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $121,200 and $49,500, respectively.
(h) Not Applicable
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Schedule is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies & Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers
Not applicable
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There were no material changes to the procedure by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant's Board of Trustees.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Registrant's President and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effective, based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) There were no changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
(a)(1) Code of Ethics - Filed herewith
(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Filed herewith
(b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Filed herewith
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
First Investors Income Funds | ||
By | /S/ | DEREK BURKE |
Derek Burke | ||
President and Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date: | December 5, 2013 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /S/ | DEREK BURKE |
Derek Burke | ||
President and Principal Executive Officer | ||
By | /S/ | JOSEPH I. BENEDEK |
Joseph I. Benedek | ||
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | ||
Date: | December 5, 2013 |