UNITED STATES |
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 |
-------- |
FORM N-CSR |
-------- |
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT |
INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT FILE NUMBER 811-3967 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
110 Wall Street |
New York, NY 10005 |
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) |
Joseph I. Benedek |
First Investors Management Company, Inc. |
Raritan Plaza I |
Edison, NJ 08837-3620 |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: |
1-212-858-8000 |
DATE OF FISCAL YEAR END: SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
DATE OF REPORTING PERIOD: SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders |
The annual report to stockholders follows |
FOREWORD |
This report is for the information of the shareholders of the Funds. It is the Funds’ practice to mail only one copy of their annual and semi-annual reports to all family members who reside at the same address and share the same last name. Additional copies of the reports will be mailed if requested by any shareholder in writing or by calling 1-800-423-4026. The Funds will ensure that separate reports are sent to any shareholder who subsequently changes his or her mailing address.
The views expressed in the portfolio manager letters reflect those views of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period covered. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and we disclaim any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice.
You may obtain a free prospectus for any of the Funds by contacting your representative, calling 1-800-423-4026, writing to us at the following address: First Investors Corporation, 110 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005, or by visiting our website at www.firstinvestors.com. You should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of a Fund carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund, and should be read carefully before investing.
An investment in a Fund is not a bank deposit and is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or any other government agency. Although the Cash Management Fund seeks to preserve a net asset value at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in it, just as it is possible to lose money by investing in any of the other Funds. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
A Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) for any of the Funds may also be obtained, without charge, upon request by calling 1-800-423-4026, writing to us at our address or by visiting our website listed above. The SAI contains more detailed information about the Funds, including information about its Trustees.
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Cash Management Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 0.0% for Class A shares and 0.0% for Class B shares. The Fund maintained a $1.00 net asset value per share for each class of shares throughout the year.
While the financial markets showed signs of recovery during the review period, the Federal Reserve (the “Fed”) kept short-term interest rates at record lows, near zero, through the entire reporting period. This effectively determined the Fund’s zero return.
Indeed, First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”), the investment adviser for the Fund, had to waive all of its management fees for the Fund, as well as assume a significant amount of the Fund’s expenses, to avoid a negative yield to the Fund’s shareholders. FIMCO expects the situation to continue and consequently, the yield to shareholders should be at or near zero for the foreseeable future.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
1 |
Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses (unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
As a mutual fund shareholder, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including a sales charge (load) on purchase payments (on Class A shares only), a contingent deferred sales charge on redemptions (on Class B shares only); and (2) ongoing costs, including advisory fees; distribution and service fees (12b-1); and other expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 in each Fund at the beginning of the period, April 1, 2010, and held for the entire six-month period ended September 30, 2010. The calculations assume that no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.
Actual Expenses Example:
These amounts help you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from the Fund’s actual return, and the “Expenses Paid During Period” shows the dollar amount that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the Fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.
To estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period, simply divide your ending account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number given for your Fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period”.
Hypothetical Expenses Example:
These amounts provide information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio for Class A and Class B shares, and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as front-end or contingent deferred sales charges (loads). Therefore, the hypothetical expenses example is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transaction costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
2 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $1.25 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,023.82 | $1.27 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $1.25 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,023.82 | $1.27 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of .25% for Class A shares and .25% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the period are net of expenses waived or assumed.
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total value of investments.
3 |
Portfolio of Investments
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
September 30, 2010
Principal | Interest | ||||||
Amount | Security | Rate | * | Value | |||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||||
OBLIGATIONS—38.3% | |||||||
Fannie Mae: | |||||||
$ 8,500 | M | 10/4/10 | 0.17 | % | $ 8,499,879 | ||
5,325 | M | 11/10/10 | 0.20 | 5,323,816 | |||
3,700 | M | 11/22/10 | 0.18 | 3,699,064 | |||
3,049 | M | 12/1/10 | 0.17 | 3,048,122 | |||
3,000 | M | 12/1/10 | 0.18 | 2,999,110 | |||
10,000 | M | 12/22/10 | 0.18 | 9,996,014 | |||
5,000 | M | 12/30/10 | 0.17 | 4,997,875 | |||
Federal Home Loan Bank: | |||||||
3,000 | M | 10/15/10 | 0.18 | 2,999,790 | |||
1,000 | M | 10/22/10 | 0.16 | 999,907 | |||
2,753 | M | 10/29/10 | 0.17 | 2,752,636 | |||
2,500 | M | 12/1/10 | 0.19 | 2,499,216 | |||
4,200 | M | Freddie Mac, 11/29/10 | 0.18 | 4,198,761 | |||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $52,014,190) | 52,014,190 | ||||||
CORPORATE NOTES—24.0% | |||||||
1,500 | M | Abbott Laboratories, 5/15/11 | 0.69 | 1,545,518 | |||
Coca-Cola Co.: | |||||||
1,500 | M | 10/25/10 (a) | 0.25 | 1,499,750 | |||
3,000 | M | 1/19/11 (a) | 0.22 | 2,997,983 | |||
2,900 | M | General Electric Capital Corp., 2/1/11 | 0.73 | 2,943,071 | |||
1,000 | M | Johnson & Johnson, 2/10/11 (a) | 0.25 | 999,084 | |||
3,000 | M | Medtronic, Inc., 12/1/10 (a) | 0.21 | 2,998,932 | |||
5,000 | M | Merck & Co., Inc., 10/21/10 (a) | 0.21 | 4,999,417 | |||
5,000 | M | PepsiCo, Inc., 10/26/10 (a) | 0.18 | 4,999,375 | |||
4,600 | M | Procter & Gamble International Finance, 11/3/10 (a) | 0.26 | 4,598,903 | |||
5,000 | M | Walmart Stores, Inc., 10/19/10 (a) | 0.21 | 4,999,475 | |||
Total Value of Corporate Notes (cost $32,581,508) | 32,581,508 |
4 |
Principal | Interest | ||||||||
Amount | Security | Rate | * | Value | |||||
VARIABLE AND FLOATING RATE NOTES—17.1% | |||||||||
$ 5,000 | M | Federal Farm Credit Bank, 9/20/11 | 0.24 | % | $ 5,000,000 | ||||
5,700 | M | Mississippi Business Finance Corp. | |||||||
(Chevron USA, Inc.), 12/1/30 | 0.25 | 5,700,000 | |||||||
3,925 | M | Monongallia Health Systems, 7/1/40 (LOC: JP Morgan) | 0.32 | 3,925,000 | |||||
2,830 | M | University of Oklahoma Hospital Rev. Series “B” | |||||||
8/15/21(LOC: Bank of Americ12.a) | 0.35 | 2,830,000 | |||||||
5,835 | M | Valdez, Alaska Marine Terminal Rev. | |||||||
(Exxon Pipeline Co., Project B), 12/1/33 | 0.23 | 5,835,000 | |||||||
Total Value of Variable and Floating Rate Notes (cost $23,290,000) | 23,290,000 | ||||||||
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT—3.7% | |||||||||
5,000 | M | Citibank, NA, 12/3/10 (cost $5,000,000) | 0.26 | 5,000,000 | |||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT FDIC GUARANTEED | |||||||||
DEBT—2.9% | |||||||||
3,950 | M | Morgan Stanley, 12/1/10 (cost $3,967,042) | 0.30 | 3,967,042 | |||||
BANKERS’ ACCEPTANCES—1.5% | |||||||||
2,037 | M | Bank of America, NA, 11/17/10 (cost $2,035,322) | 0.63 | 2,035,322 | |||||
SHORT-TERM U.S. GOVERNMENT | |||||||||
OBLIGATIONS—10.0% | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills: | |||||||||
6,600 | M | 12/9/10 | 0.14 | 6,598,229 | |||||
7,000 | M | 12/16/10 | 0.16 | 6,997,694 | |||||
Total Value of Short-Term U.S. Government Obligations (cost $13,595,923) | 13,595,923 | ||||||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $132,483,985)** | 97.5 | % | 132,483,985 | ||||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 2.5 | 3,358,161 | |||||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $135,842,146 |
5 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued))
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND
September 30, 2010
* The interest rates shown are the effective rates at the time of purchase by the Fund. The interest rates shown on floating rate notes are adjusted periodically; the rates shown are the rates in effect at September 30, 2010.
** Aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes is the same.
(a) Security exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4).
Summary of Abbreviations:
LOC Letters of Credit
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | ||||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | |||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | $ | — | $ | 52,014,190 | $ | — | $ | 52,014,190 | ||||
Corporate Notes | — | 32,581,508 | — | 32,581,508 | ||||||||
Variable and Floating Rate Notes: | ||||||||||||
Corporate Notes | — | 18,290,000 | — | 18,290,000 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 5,000,000 | — | 5,000,000 | ||||||||
Certificates of Deposit | — | 5,000,000 | — | 5,000,000 | ||||||||
U.S. Government FDIC | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed Debt | — | 3,967,042 | — | 3,967,042 | ||||||||
Bankers’ Acceptances | — | 2,035,322 | — | 2,035,322 | ||||||||
Short-Term U.S. Government | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 13,595,923 | — | 13,595,923 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | — | $ | 132,483,985 | $ | — | $ | 132,483,985 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
6 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
GOVERNMENT FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Government Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 5.4% for Class A shares and 4.7% for Class B shares, including dividends of 43.5 cents per share on Class A shares and 35.9 cents per share on Class B shares.
The Fund invests primarily in Ginnie Maes, which are mortgage-backed bonds issued by the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). These bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government and have the highest possible credit rating (AAA).
The review period began with the economy growing at a 5% rate, the best quarter of what has become a disappointing recovery from the Great Recession of 2008-2009. By the second quarter of 2010, growth had slowed to an anemic 1.7% rate, and the unemployment rate had stalled at an uncomfortably high 9.6%. With below trend growth and high unemployment, investors began to worry about the possibility of deflation, as the Consumer Price Index (excluding the volatile food and energy components) was up only 0.9% for the twelve months ending in August, the smallest increase in over 40 years.
With this economic background, the Federal Reserve remained focused on stimulating the economy by keeping interest rates at historically low levels. Consequently, the two-year U.S. Treasury note yield fell to an all-time low, ending the review period at 0.4%. Longer term interest rates also fell, with the ten-year Treasury note yield dropping to 2.5%, a level only seen during the past 40 years in late 2008 when Lehman Brothers failed. The mortgage-backed market generally benefited from falling interest rates until the last two months of the review period, when fear of an increase in prepayments on mortgages due to record low mortgage rates caused the sector to underperform relative to other fixed income investments.
Because of the decline in interest rates, the Fund’s underweight in lower coupon mortgage-backed bonds (which are more sensitive to changes in interest rates) detracted from performance. The Fund’s holdings of mortgage-backed bonds backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (approximately 14% of assets) also negatively impacted performance. These holdings underperformed GNMA mortgage-backed bonds due to higher prepayments and investor preference for the government guarantee on GNMAs. Lastly, although the Fund held very low cash balances during the review period, even a small amount of cash affected performance because of the extremely low interest rates available on money market investments.
7 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
GOVERNMENT FUND
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
Sincerely,
8 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GOVERNMENT FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,032.58 | $5.76 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,019.40 | $5.72 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,029.20 | $9.31 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,015.89 | $9.25 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.13% for Class A shares and 1.83% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the period are net of expenses waived.
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total value of investments.
9 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GOVERNMENT FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Government Fund (Class A shares) and the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch GNMA Master Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Government Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/00 with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch GNMA Master Index (the “Index”). The Index is a market capitalization-weighted index of securities backed by mortgage pools of the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75% (prior to 6/17/02, the maximum sales charge was 6.25%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been (.75%), 3.96% and 4.26%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2010 would have been 3.04%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and T en Years would have been .59%, 4.11% and 4.25%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2010 would have been 2.54%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
10 |
Portfolio of Investments
GOVERNMENT FUND
September 30, 2010
Principal | |||||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | |||||||
SECURITIES—99.5% | |||||||
Fannie Mae—13.6% | |||||||
$ 9,905 | M | 5%, 8/1/2039 – 12/1/2039 | $ 10,435,144 | ||||
23,107 | M | 5.5%, 7/1/2033 – 10/1/2039 | 24,694,383 | ||||
9,744 | M | 6%, 11/1/2033 – 7/1/2039 | 10,520,413 | ||||
45,649,940 | |||||||
Government National Mortgage Association I | |||||||
Program—85.9% | |||||||
43,537 | M | 4.5%, 6/15/2039 – 9/15/2040 | 45,903,420 | ||||
112,849 | M | 5%, 4/15/2033 – 6/15/2040 | 120,522,266 | ||||
54,501 | M | 5.5%, 3/15/2033 – 10/15/2039 | 58,923,163 | ||||
41,604 | M | 6%, 3/15/2031 – 4/15/2040 | 45,520,572 | ||||
12,690 | M | 6.5%, 10/15/2028 – 3/15/2038 | 14,267,829 | ||||
3,689 | M | 7%, 1/15/2030 – 4/15/2034 | 4,251,039 | ||||
289,388,289 | |||||||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $322,876,836) | 335,038,229 | ||||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS—.3% | |||||||
Money Market Fund | |||||||
1,100 | M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% (cost $1,100,000)* | 1,100,000 | ||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $323,976,836) | 99.8 | % | 336,138,229 | ||||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .2 | 700,584 | |||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $336,838,813 |
11 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued))
GOVERNMENT FUND
September 30, 2010
* Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | ||||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | |||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | $ | — | $ | 335,038,229 | $ | — | $ | 335,038,229 | ||||
Money Market Fund | 1,100,000 | — | — | 1,100,000 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 1,100,000 | $335,038,229 | $ | — | $ | 336,138,229 |
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
12 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Investment Grade Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 13.1% for Class A shares and 12.2% for Class B shares, including dividends of 45.1 cents per share on Class A shares and 38.7 cents per share on Class B shares.
The review period began with increased optimism for a continued global economic recovery and confidence in the credit markets. However, over the next several months the positive tone was somewhat offset by certain systemic concerns. Weak economic data pointed toward a slower than expected economic recovery. In addition, concern about rising Eurozone deficits and debt levels led to downgrades of European government debt and increased market scrutiny on sovereign risk. Benchmark U.S. Treasury yields moved much lower during the review period as investors flocked to Treasuries for their relative safety. By the end of the review period, some of the sovereign risk concerns were alleviated by the results of the European bank stress test and the financial markets were supported by strong earnings reports. For the corporate bond market, spreads remained range bound during the review period. Sentiments shifted from concerns regarding event risk and regulatory reform risk to confidence in the increased financial strength of corporate issuers. By the end of the review period, the corporate bond market had registered very strong 12-month returns, led by falling interest rates.
The Fund had strong double-digit returns over the period. The majority of the Fund’s assets were invested in investment grade corporate bonds. The Fund increased its corporate bond holdings to over 95% of assets during the review period. In addition, the Fund had a substantial overweight in BBB-rated corporate bonds, which had the highest returns among all investment grade rating classes. Furthermore, the Fund had limited exposure to corporate names associated with the European debt crisis. An additional factor that enhanced performance was the Fund’s underweight in corporate bonds with maturities between one and three years. Shorter maturity bonds had the lowest returns during the review period as falling two-year U.S. Treasury yields reached all-time lows. The Fund’s holdings in high-yield corporate bonds were less than 5% of assets throughout the period.
13 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
14 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,083.12 | $5.85 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,019.45 | $5.67 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,079.53 | $9.49 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,015.95 | $9.20 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.12% for Class A shares and 1.82% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the period are net of expenses waived.
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total value of investments.
15 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Investment Grade Fund (Class A shares) and the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Investment Grade Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/00 with a theoretical investment in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate Master Index (the “Index”). The Index tracks the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated investment grade Corporate public debt issued in the U.S. domestic bond market. Qualifying bonds must have at least one year remaining term to maturity, a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $150 million. Bonds must be rated investment grade based on a composite of Moody’s and S&P. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75% (prior to 6/17/02, the maximum sales charge was 6.25%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 6.42%, 3.97% and 5.03%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2010 would have been 2.66%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Te n Years would have been 8.08%, 4.13% and 5.04%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2010 would have been 2.14%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
16 |
Portfolio of Investments
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2010
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
CORPORATE BONDS—96.8% | |||||
Aerospace/Defense—1.5% | |||||
$ 1,800 | M | BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 4.95%, 2014 (a) | $ 1,988,010 | ||
4,000 | M | Lockheed Martin Corp., 4.25%, 2019 | 4,368,808 | ||
6,356,818 | |||||
Agriculture—1.3% | |||||
2,725 | M | Cargill, Inc., 6%, 2017 (a) | 3,226,397 | ||
1,900 | M | Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 | 2,023,671 | ||
5,250,068 | |||||
Automotive—1.1% | |||||
4,000 | M | Daimler Chrysler NA, LLC, 6.5%, 2013 | 4,578,580 | ||
Chemicals—.9% | |||||
3,000 | M | Chevron Phillips Chemicals Co., LLC, 8.25%, 2019 (a) | 3,803,037 | ||
Consumer Durables—2.0% | |||||
2,100 | M | Black & Decker Corp., 5.75%, 2016 | 2,432,653 | ||
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.: | |||||
1,600 | M | 6.75%, 2012 | 1,713,029 | ||
1,900 | M | 4.7%, 2020 | 1,993,168 | ||
2,400 | M | Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., 5.2%, 2040 | 2,412,617 | ||
8,551,467 | |||||
Energy—13.2% | |||||
3,900 | M | Canadian Oil Sands, Ltd., 7.75%, 2019 (a) | 4,846,179 | ||
4,800 | M | DCP Midstream, LLC, 9.75%, 2019 (a) | 6,397,061 | ||
1,800 | M | Energy Transfer Partners, LP, 8.5%, 2014 | 2,138,834 | ||
850 | M | Kinder Morgan Finance Co., 5.35%, 2011 | 864,875 | ||
1,275 | M | Marathon Oil Corp., 7.5%, 2019 | 1,635,291 | ||
3,842 | M | Maritime & Northeast Pipeline, LLC, 7.5%, 2014 (a) | 4,197,394 | ||
4,000 | M | Nabors Industries, Inc., 6.15%, 2018 | 4,458,576 | ||
Nexen, Inc.: | |||||
2,000 | M | 5.05%, 2013 | 2,179,852 | ||
4,000 | M | 6.4%, 2037 | 4,373,260 | ||
2,000 | M | Northern Border Partners, LP, 7.1%, 2011 | 2,050,860 | ||
900 | M | Plains All American Pipeline, LP, 8.75%, 2019 | 1,144,105 | ||
5,800 | M | Spectra Energy Capital, LLC, 6.2%, 2018 | 6,793,412 | ||
4,400 | M | Suncor Energy, Inc., 6.85%, 2039 | 5,292,844 | ||
2,700 | M | Valero Energy Corp., 9.375%, 2019 | 3,453,373 |
17 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2010
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Energy (continued) | ||||
Weatherford International, Inc., 6.35%, 2017 | ||||
$ 4,000 | M | 6.35%, 2017 | $ 4,489,548 | |
1,000 | M | 5.125%, 2020 | 1,024,264 | |
55,339,728 | ||||
Financial Services—11.2% | ||||
6,000 | M | American Express Co., 7%, 2018 | 7,237,110 | |
5,040 | M | Amvescap, PLC, 5.375%, 2013 | 5,377,272 | |
4,000 | M | BlackRock, Inc., 5%, 2019 | 4,417,664 | |
3,260 | M | CoBank, ACB, 7.875%, 2018 (a) | 3,789,091 | |
1,800 | M | Compass Bank, 6.4%, 2017 | 1,909,258 | |
ERAC USA Finance Co.: | ||||
1,170 | M | 8%, 2011 (a) | 1,192,154 | |
2,200 | M | 6.375%, 2017 (a) | 2,561,293 | |
4,000 | M | General Electric Capital Corp., 5.625%, 2017 | 4,474,916 | |
Harley-Davidson Funding Corp.: | ||||
1,800 | M | 5.75%, 2014 (a) | 1,921,700 | |
2,100 | M | 6.8%, 2018 (a) | 2,286,753 | |
2,000 | M | MetLife, Inc., 4.75%, 2021 | 2,126,162 | |
4,000 | M | Protective Life Corp., 7.375%, 2019 | 4,510,188 | |
4,600 | M | Prudential Financial Corp., 4.75%, 2015 | 4,980,264 | |
46,783,825 | ||||
Financials—16.9% | ||||
1,900 | M | Bank of America Corp., 5.65%, 2018 | 2,016,166 | |
5,400 | M | Barclays Bank, PLC, 5.125%, 2020 | 5,849,058 | |
1,500 | M | Bear Stearns Cos., Inc., 7.25%, 2018 | 1,829,883 | |
Citigroup, Inc.: | ||||
5,200 | M | 6.375%, 2014 | 5,779,446 | |
4,400 | M | 6.125%, 2017 | 4,813,327 | |
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.: | ||||
3,400 | M | 6.15%, 2018 | 3,777,036 | |
1,600 | M | 6.45%, 2036 | 1,609,731 | |
2,750 | M | 6.75%, 2037 | 2,867,450 | |
5,000 | M | JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6%, 2018 | 5,718,455 | |
7,600 | M | Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5%, 2015 | 8,101,592 | |
Morgan Stanley: | ||||
5,800 | M | 5.95%, 2017 | 6,239,414 | |
5,000 | M | 6.625%, 2018 | 5,551,545 | |
5,000 | M | SunTrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 2017 | 5,423,080 |
18 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Financials (continued) | ||||
UBS AG: | ||||
$ 2,200 | M | 5.875%, 2017 | $ 2,492,976 | |
4,000 | M | 4.875%, 2020 | 4,225,940 | |
4,000 | M | Wells Fargo & Co., 5.625%, 2017 | 4,562,780 | |
70,857,879 | ||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—8.9% | ||||
4,600 | M | Altria Group, Inc., 9.7%, 2018 | 6,235,944 | |
5,000 | M | Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc., 5.375%, 2020 | 5,654,430 | |
2,700 | M | Bottling Group, LLC, 5.125%, 2019 | 3,103,804 | |
1,980 | M | Bunge Limited Finance Corp., 5.35%, 2014 | 2,115,454 | |
4,500 | M | Corn Products International, Inc., 4.625%, 2020 | 4,612,554 | |
4,000 | M | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 6.82%, 2018 | 4,956,560 | |
5,000 | M | Lorillard Tobacco Co., 6.875%, 2020 | 5,297,905 | |
4,600 | M | Philip Morris International, Inc., 5.65%, 2018 | 5,394,218 | |
37,370,869 | ||||
Forest Products/Container—.7% | ||||
2,200 | M | International Paper Co., 9.375%, 2019 | 2,858,511 | |
Health Care—3.5% | ||||
5,300 | M | Biogen IDEC, Inc., 6.875%, 2018 | 6,228,433 | |
2,400 | M | Novartis, 5.125%, 2019 | 2,760,264 | |
1,000 | M | Pfizer, Inc., 6.2%, 2019 | 1,233,349 | |
1,000 | M | Roche Holdings, Inc., 6%, 2019 (a) | 1,213,525 | |
3,000 | M | Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 5%, 2014 | 3,271,245 | |
14,706,816 | ||||
Information Technology—2.7% | ||||
3,000 | M | Adobe Systems, Inc., 4.75%, 2020 | 3,235,260 | |
3,000 | M | Dell, Inc., 5.875%, 2019 | 3,487,209 | |
3,208 | M | Dun & Bradstreet Corp., 6%, 2013 | 3,521,688 | |
900 | M | Pitney Bowes, Inc., 5%, 2015 | 972,996 | |
11,217,153 |
19 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2010
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Manufacturing—3.1% | ||||
$ 1,750 | M | Briggs & Stratton Corp., 8.875%, 2011 | $ 1,811,250 | |
2,700 | M | General Electric Co., 5.25%, 2017 | 3,043,445 | |
2,100 | M | Ingersoll-Rand Global Holdings Co., 6.875%, 2018 | 2,553,965 | |
3,200 | M | Johnson Controls, Inc., 5%, 2020 | 3,523,520 | |
1,725 | M | Tyco Electronics Group SA, 6.55%, 2017 | 2,020,458 | |
12,952,638 | ||||
Media-Broadcasting—6.0% | ||||
3,950 | M | British Sky Broadcasting Group, PLC, 9.5%, 2018 (a) | 5,401,708 | |
4,000 | M | Comcast Corp., 5.15%, 2020 | 4,379,820 | |
Cox Communications, Inc.: | ||||
2,000 | M | 4.625%, 2013 | 2,158,692 | |
3,100 | M | 8.375%, 2039 (a) | 4,174,950 | |
4,000 | M | DirecTV Holdings, LLC, 7.625%, 2016 | 4,465,140 | |
3,700 | M | Time Warner Cable, Inc., 6.75%, 2018 | 4,419,594 | |
24,999,904 | ||||
Media-Diversified—2.2% | ||||
McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc.: | ||||
1,800 | M | 5.9%, 2017 | 2,036,223 | |
2,300 | M | 6.55%, 2037 | 2,661,415 | |
4,000 | M | News America, Inc., 5.3%, 2014 | 4,518,656 | |
9,216,294 | ||||
Metals/Mining—6.1% | ||||
4,000 | M | Alcoa, Inc., 6.15%, 2020 | 4,120,160 | |
4,000 | M | AngloGold Ashanti Holdings, PLC, 5.375%, 2020 | 4,239,448 | |
4,000 | M | ArcelorMittal, 6.125%, 2018 | 4,332,712 | |
3,800 | M | Newmont Mining Corp., 5.125%, 2019 | 4,258,687 | |
2,595 | M | Rio Tinto Finance USA, Ltd., 6.5%, 2018 | 3,134,262 | |
Vale Overseas, Ltd.: | ||||
4,000 | M | 5.625%, 2019 | 4,429,664 | |
900 | M | 4.625%, 2020 | 934,055 | |
25,448,988 |
20 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—3.2% | ||||
$ 4,000 | M | Boston Properties, LP, 5.875%, 2019 | $ 4,477,156 | |
4,000 | M | ProLogis, 7.625%, 2014 | 4,326,484 | |
4,000 | M | Simon Property Group, LP, 5.75%, 2015 | 4,560,088 | |
13,363,728 | ||||
Retail-General Merchandise—1.0% | ||||
4,000 | M | Home Depot, Inc., 5.875%, 2036 | 4,278,996 | |
Telecommunications—3.8% | ||||
4,000 | M | AT&T, Inc., 5.8%, 2019 | 4,776,272 | |
4,000 | M | Deutsche Telekom Intl. Finance BV, 5.875%, 2013 | 4,470,984 | |
3,300 | M | GTE Corp., 6.84%, 2018 | 3,917,651 | |
2,400 | M | Verizon Wireless Capital, LLC, 5.55%, 2014 | 2,716,140 | |
15,881,047 | ||||
Transportation—1.1% | ||||
4,000 | M | GATX Corp., 8.75%, 2014 | 4,728,312 | |
Utilities—5.6% | ||||
4,000 | M | E. ON International Finance BV, 5.8%, 2018 (a) | 4,740,788 | |
Electricite de France SA: | ||||
1,900 | M | 6.5%, 2019 (a) | 2,324,321 | |
2,100 | M | 6.95%, 2039 (a) | 2,750,112 | |
1,193 | M | Entergy Gulf States, Inc., 5.25%, 2015 | 1,194,905 | |
4,000 | M | Exelon Generation Co., LLC, 6.2%, 2017 | 4,696,380 | |
714 | M | Great River Energy Co., 5.829%, 2017 (a) | 802,314 | |
3,000 | M | Ohio Power Co., 5.375%, 2021 | 3,429,345 | |
2,561 | M | Sempra Energy, 9.8%, 2019 | 3,575,981 | |
23,514,146 | ||||
Waste Management—.8% | ||||
3,300 | M | Allied Waste NA, Inc., 7.125%, 2016 | 3,539,220 | |
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $365,391,377) | 405,598,024 |
21 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND
September 30, 2010
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS—.9% | ||||||
Money Market Fund | ||||||
$ 3,650 | M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% | ||||
(cost $3,650,000) (b) | $ 3,650,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $369,041,377) | 97.7 | % | 409,248,024 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 2.3 | 9,448,766 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $418,696,790 |
(a) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4).
(b) Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | ||||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | |||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | $ | — | $ | 405,598,024 | $ | — | $ | 405,598,024 | ||||
Money Market Fund | 3,650,000 | — | — | 3,650,000 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 3,650,000 | $ | 405,598,024 | $ | — | $ | 409,248,024 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for corporate bonds.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
22 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
FUND FOR INCOME
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Fund For Income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 15.7% for Class A shares and 14.4% for Class B shares, including dividends of 18.0 cents per share on Class A shares and 16.5 cents per share on Class B shares.
The review period proved to be very positive for the Fund, encompassing three very strong quarters of performance, as well as one very challenging quarter. In the first, second and last quarters, the U.S. high yield market generated very attractive returns, with the riskier segments of the market turning in the best returns. Despite record new U.S. issuance, both primary and secondary bonds were well bid and spreads continued to tighten throughout the period. Yield-seeking assets continued to flow into the high yield market, which still offered an above-average spread, easily absorbing the debt being issued by high yield companies looking to secure fixed rate financing largely for the purposes of refinancing and extending near-term debt obligations, thereby improving their balance sheets. In short, the review period overall offered a “win” for all of the high yield market’s participants. As in 2009, the distressed portion of the market genera ted outsized gains, followed by CCC credits. The insurance, financials and banking sectors — where a high degree of distressed or formerly distressed paper is concentrated — continued to be outsized earners.
In the third quarter of the review period, however, market sentiment turned sharply on the back of a variety of headline news that refocused investors on risk; such as Greece’s sovereign debt crisis, tension in the Korean peninsula, and the blow-out of BP’s deep-water well in the Gulf of Mexico. Investors interested in reducing equity risk sent stock markets deep into the red during the quarter. U.S. Treasuries outperformed, as investors pushed down yields to record lows in search of safety. Weak employment and housing data released in June made investors question the prospect of strong growth going forward. U.S. high yield bonds, although not as firm as Treasuries, impressed by delivering a flat return. Investors continued to appear confident that corporations would be able to repay borrowed money, even if they would not expand earnings quickly enough to justify appreciation of the stock market. Within the high yield market itself, the theme was similar during the quarter. Riskier CCC credits, mirroring weak equity markets, underperformed at this moment of stress. Dispersion of returns by industry during the third quarter was much lower than that experienced in 2009, or during the rest of 2010.
In summary, the high yield market during the period provided the investment community with plenty of positive news to satisfy its greed, and just enough fear to remind us of the key importance of careful credit analysis and prudent risk control in the
23 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
longer term. System shocks are, by definition, unpredictable, and investments in bond portfolios should target resiliency. In this environment, the Fund performed admirably. Our carefully selected credit mix preserved capital better than the market during its most challenging month (May) and largely kept pace with the market’s positive performance, even while underweighted in the more speculative insurance and banking sectors. During the second half of the review period, the fund performed particularly well by taking advantage of smaller, analyzable market opportunities and dislocations. For example, strong performance in the energy sector, and in particular the oil sector, followed from our analysis that the market had mispriced a number of securities in the wake of the explosion of BP’s oil well in the Gulf of Mexico. Against a market backdrop that continues to offer strong fundamental advantages and technical support by market participants, we will continue to work to i dentify incremental opportunities for attractive returns with reasonable risk.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
Sincerely,
* Mr. Comeaux is part of a portfolio management team that began managing the Fund on April 24, 2009.
24 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,071.52 | $6.65 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,018.65 | $6.48 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,063.67 | $10.24 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,015.14 | $10.00 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.28% for Class A shares and 1.98% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the period are net of expenses waived.
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total value of investments.
25 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Fund For Income (Class A shares), the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index† and the Credit Suisse High Yield Index II.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Fund For Income (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/00 with theoretical investments in the BofA Merrill Lynch BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index and the Credit Suisse High Yield Index II (the “Indices”). The BofA Merrill Lynch BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index contains all securities in the BofA Merrill Lynch US Cash Pay High Yield Index rated BB1 through B3, based on an average of Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, but caps issuer exposure at 2%. Index constituents are capitalization-weighted, based on their current amount outstanding, provided the total allocation to an individual issuer does not exceed 2%. The Credit Suisse High Yield Index II is designed to measure the performance of the high yield bond market. As of 9/30/10, the Index consisted of 1,243 different issues, most of which are cash-pay; also included in the Index are zero-coupon bonds, step bonds, payment-in-kind bonds a nd bonds which are in default. As of 9/30/10, approximately 0.71% of the market value of the Index was in default. The bonds included in the Index have an average maturity of 6.58 years, an average duration of 3.72 years and an average coupon of 8.54%. It is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table it is assumed that all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75% (prior to 6/17/02, the maximum sales charge was 6.25%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 9.05%, 2.39% and 3.84%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2010 would have been 5.37%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 10 .39%, 2.62% and 3.93%, respectively, and the S.E.C. 30-Day Yield for September 2010 would have been 5.00%. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. The issuers of the high yield bonds, in which the Fund primarily invests, pay higher interest rates because they have a greater likelihood of financial difficulty, which could result in their inability to repay the bonds fully when due. Prices of high yield bonds are also subject to greater fluctuations. BofA Merrill Lynch BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index figures from Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Credit Suisse High Yiel d Index II figures are from Credit Suisse Corporation and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
† We have added a comparison to the BofA Merrill Lynch BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index this year since it more closely reflects the performance of the securities in which the Fund invests. After this year we will not show a comparison to the Credit Suisse High Yield Index II.
26 |
Portfolio of Investments
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2010
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
CORPORATE BONDS—97.0% | |||||
Automotive—3.2% | |||||
$ 2,200 | M | Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 8%, 2019 | $ 2,279,750 | ||
2,825 | M | Cooper-Standard Automotive, 8.5%, 2018 (a) | 2,945,062 | ||
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.: | |||||
2,500 | M | 10.5%, 2016 | 2,843,750 | ||
1,575 | M | 8.25%, 2020 | 1,665,562 | ||
1,750 | M | Navistar International Corp., 8.25%, 2021 | 1,876,875 | ||
2,100 | M | Oshkosh Corp., 8.5%, 2020 | 2,283,750 | ||
2,325 | M | TRW Automotive, Inc., 7.25%, 2017 (a) | 2,481,938 | ||
16,376,687 | |||||
Building Materials—2.4% | |||||
Building Materials Corp.: | |||||
1,475 | M | 6.875%, 2018 (a) | 1,456,562 | ||
4,175 | M | 7.5%, 2020 (a) | 4,216,750 | ||
1,375 | M | Interface, Inc., 11.375%, 2013 | 1,567,500 | ||
1,725 | M | Mohawk Industries, Inc., 6.875%, 2016 | 1,804,781 | ||
3,450 | M | Texas Industries, Inc., 9.25%, 2020 (a) | 3,596,625 | ||
12,642,218 | |||||
Capital Goods—.6% | |||||
2,650 | M | Belden CDT, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 (a) | 2,875,250 | ||
Chemicals—4.3% | |||||
1,475 | M | Chemtura Corp., 7.875%, 2018 (a) | 1,545,062 | ||
2,175 | M | Ferro Corp., 7.875%, 2018 | 2,267,437 | ||
7,075 | M | Georgia Gulf Corp., 9%, 2017 (a) | 7,446,437 | ||
3,125 | M | Lyondell Chemical Co., 11%, 2018 | 3,472,656 | ||
1,600 | M | PolyOne Corp., 7.375%, 2020 | 1,654,000 | ||
Solutia, Inc.: | |||||
3,925 | M | 8.75%, 2017 | 4,307,688 | ||
1,275 | M | 7.875%, 2020 | 1,369,031 | ||
22,062,311 | |||||
Consumer Durables—1.0% | |||||
Sealy Mattress Co.: | |||||
3,500 | M | 8.25%, 2014 | 3,543,750 | ||
1,392 | M | 10.875%, 2016 (a) | 1,583,400 | ||
5,127,150 |
27 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2010
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Consumer Non-Durables—2.0% | ||||
$ 2,575 | M | Acco Brands Corp., 10.625%, 2015 | $ 2,890,437 | |
2,450 | M | Jarden Corp., 7.5%, 2020 | 2,560,250 | |
3,025 | M | Phillips Van-Heusen Corp., 7.375%, 2020 | 3,202,719 | |
1,525 | M | Spectrum Brands, Inc., 9.5%, 2018 (a) | 1,637,469 | |
10,290,875 | ||||
Energy—15.4% | ||||
Anadarko Petroleum Corp.: | ||||
2,42 | M | 6.375%, 2017 | 2,676,026 | |
1,350 | M | 6.95%, 2019 | 1,508,922 | |
Berry Petroleum Co.: | ||||
2,600 | M | 10.25%, 2014 | 2,944,500 | |
2,925 | M | 8.25%, 2016 | 3,012,750 | |
Chesapeake Energy Corp.: | ||||
1,750 | M | 9.5%, 2015 | 2,034,375 | |
1,850 | M | 7.25%, 2018 | 2,002,625 | |
2,300 | M | Concho Resources, Inc., 8.625%, 2017 | 2,449,500 | |
Consol Energy, Inc.: | ||||
1,875 | M | 8%, 2017 (a) | 2,039,062 | |
4,425 | M | 8.25%, 2020 (a) | 4,856,437 | |
1,325 | M | Continental Resources, 7.125%, 2021 (a) | 1,384,625 | |
3,500 | M | Copano Energy, LLC, 7.75%, 2018 | 3,552,500 | |
4,750 | M | Crosstex Energy, LP, 8.875%, 2018 | 4,999,375 | |
El Paso Corp.: | ||||
1,050 | M | 8.25%, 2016 | 1,173,375 | |
4,325 | M | 7%, 2017 | 4,614,195 | |
350 | M | 7.25%, 2018 | 378,986 | |
275 | M | 7.75%, 2032 | 286,924 | |
750 | M | Encore Acquisition Co., 9.5%, 2016 | 840,937 | |
3,975 | M | Expro Finance Luxembourg SCA, 8.5%, 2016 (a) | 3,806,062 | |
Ferrellgas Partners, LP: | ||||
3,450 | M | 9.125%, 2017 | 3,756,187 | |
2,475 | M | 8.625%, 2020 | 2,666,812 | |
1,900 | M | Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., 9.5%, 2016 (a) | 1,933,250 | |
Hilcorp Energy I, LP: | ||||
175 | M | 7.75%, 2015 (a) | 177,625 | |
3,100 | M | 9%, 2016 (a) | 3,231,750 | |
3,875 | M | 8%, 2020 (a) | 4,000,938 |
28 |
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
Energy (continued) | |||||
$ 2,475 | M | Inergy, LP, 7%, 2018 (a) | $ 2,549,250 | ||
1,600 | M | Linn Energy, LLC, 9.875%, 2018 | 1,764,000 | ||
1,025 | M | Penn Virginia Corp., 10.375%, 2016 | 1,127,500 | ||
Pioneer Natural Resource Co.: | |||||
375 | M | 6.65%, 2017 | 401,731 | ||
2,925 | M | 7.5%, 2020 | 3,233,289 | ||
1,275 | M | QEP Resources, Inc., 6.875%, 2021 | 1,386,563 | ||
Quicksilver Resources, Inc.: | |||||
575 | M | 8.25%, 2015 | 609,500 | ||
1,175 | M | 7.125%, 2016 | 1,166,188 | ||
2,100 | M | 11.75%, 2016 | 2,472,750 | ||
1,775 | M | 9.125%, 2019 | 1,954,719 | ||
1,100 | M | Southwestern Energy Co., 7.5%, 2018 | 1,248,500 | ||
1,150 | M | Whiting Petroleum Corp., 6.5%, 2018 | 1,181,625 | ||
79,423,353 | |||||
Financials—3.4% | |||||
Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC: | |||||
1,800 | M | 7.5%, 2012 | 1,911,623 | ||
2,725 | M | 8.7%, 2014 | 3,059,706 | ||
1,075 | M | 5.625%, 2015 | 1,106,629 | ||
925 | M | 6.625%, 2017 | 986,890 | ||
International Lease Finance Corp.: | |||||
1,550 | M | 5.55%, 2012 | 1,559,688 | ||
1,400 | M | 6.375%, 2013 | 1,414,000 | ||
750 | M | 6.625%, 2013 | 755,625 | ||
1,275 | M | 8.625%, 2015 (a) | 1,367,438 | ||
1,900 | M | 8.75%, 2017 (a) | 2,042,500 | ||
3,125 | M | Pinafore, LLC, 9%, 2018 (a) | 3,296,875 | ||
17,500,974 | |||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—4.2% | |||||
3,333 | M | Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, 7.75%, 2015 | 3,582,975 | ||
2,675 | M | CF Industries, Inc., 7.125%, 2020 | 2,932,469 | ||
7,625 | M | JBS USA, LLC, 8.25%, 2018 | 7,901,406 | ||
3,900 | M | Michael Foods, Inc., 9.75%, 2018 (a) | 4,192,500 | ||
2,700 | M | Smithfield Foods, Inc., 10%, 2014 (a) | 3,118,500 | ||
21,727,850 |
29 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2010
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Food/Drug—1.1% | ||||
$ 925 | M | McJunkin Red Man Corp., 9.5%, 2016 (a) | $ 818,625 | |
1,700 | M | NBTY, Inc., 9%, 2018 (a) | 1,793,500 | |
950 | M | Rite Aid Corp., 9.75%, 2016 | 1,020,063 | |
1,775 | M | Tops Markets, LLC, 10.125%, 2015 (a) | 1,914,781 | |
5,546,969 | ||||
Forest Products/Containers—1.0% | ||||
1,450 | M | Graham Packaging Co., LP, 8.25%, 2018 (a) | 1,480,812 | |
3,775 | M | Reynolds Group Escrow, LLC, 7.75%, 2016 (a) | 3,859,938 | |
5,340,750 | ||||
Gaming/Leisure—4.0% | ||||
2,300 | M | Equinox Holdings, Inc., 9.5%, 2016 (a) | 2,363,250 | |
2,550 | M | Las Vegas Sands Corp., 6.375%, 2015 | 2,585,063 | |
2,610 | M | Mandalay Resort Group, 6.375%, 2011 | 2,551,275 | |
2,300 | M | MCE Finance, Ltd., 10.25%, 2018 (a) | 2,570,250 | |
1,950 | M | MGM Mirage, Inc., 9%, 2020 (a) | 2,062,125 | |
3,000 | M | NCL Corp., Ltd., 11.75%, 2016 | 3,375,000 | |
2,425 | M | Wynn Las Vegas, LLC, 7.75%, 2020 (a) | 2,570,500 | |
2,326 | M | Yonkers Racing Corp., 11.375%, 2016 (a) | 2,535,340 | |
20,612,803 | ||||
Health Care—5.4% | ||||
1,250 | M | Capella Healthcare, 9.25%, 2017 (a) | 1,340,625 | |
6,375 | M | Community Health Systems, Inc., 8.875%, 2015 | 6,789,375 | |
4,400 | M | Genesis Health Ventures, Inc., 9.75%, 2011 (b)(c) | 2,750 | |
HCA, Inc.: | ||||
5,700 | M | 6.75%, 2013 | 5,842,500 | |
2,800 | M | 6.375%, 2015 | 2,807,000 | |
Healthsouth Corp.: | ||||
1,650 | M | 7.25%, 2018 | 1,687,125 | |
950 | M | 7.75%, 2022 | 959,500 | |
LVB Acquisition Holding, LLC (Biomet, Inc.): | ||||
625 | M | 10%, 2017 | 692,969 | |
2,000 | M | 11.625%, 2017 | 2,237,500 | |
2,475 | M | Talecris Biotherapeutics Holdings Corp., 7.75%, 2016 | 2,734,875 | |
2,450 | M | Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, 6.75%, 2017 (a) | 2,505,125 | |
27,599,344 |
30 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Information Technology—2.3% | ||||
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.: | ||||
$ 750 | M | 6.625%, 2018 (a) | $ 783,750 | |
850 | M | 6.875%, 2020 (a) | 896,750 | |
2,425 | M | Equinix, Inc., 8.125%, 2018 | 2,600,812 | |
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.: | ||||
700 | M | 7.625%, 2017 (a) | 750,750 | |
450 | M | 7.875%, 2020 (a) | 487,125 | |
Jabil Circuit, Inc.: | ||||
350 | M | 7.75%, 2016 | 385,438 | |
3,825 | M | 8.25%, 2018 | 4,293,563 | |
1,500 | M | JDA Software Group, Inc., 8%, 2014 (a) | 1,597,500 | |
11,795,688 | ||||
Manufacturing—4.3% | ||||
2,400 | M | Amsted Industries, 8.125%, 2018 (a) | 2,511,000 | |
Case New Holland, Inc.: | ||||
2,200 | M | 7.75%, 2013 | 2,400,750 | |
2,075 | M | 7.875%, 2017 (a) | 2,264,344 | |
2,850 | M | Coleman Cable, Inc., 9%, 2018 | 2,928,375 | |
1,325 | M | CPM Holdings, Inc,, 10.625%, 2014 (a) | 1,434,312 | |
2,000 | M | ESCO Corp., 8.625%, 2013 (a) | 2,060,000 | |
Terex Corp.: | ||||
3,100 | M | 10.875%, 2016 | 3,553,375 | |
5,100 | M | 8%, 2017 | 5,131,875 | |
22,284,031 | ||||
Media-Broadcasting—3.6% | ||||
2,800 | M | Allbritton Communication Co., 8%, 2018 | 2,821,000 | |
Belo Corp.: | ||||
4,000 | M | 7.25%, 2027 | 3,430,000 | |
725 | M | 7.75%, 2027 | 643,437 | |
Lin Television Corp.: | ||||
1,900 | M | 6.5%, 2013 | 1,895,250 | |
675 | M | 6.5%, 2013 | 678,375 | |
875 | M | 8.375%, 2018 (a) | 928,594 | |
2,475 | M | Nexstar/Mission Broadcasting, Inc., 8.875%, 2017 (a) | 2,592,563 | |
Sinclair Television Group: | ||||
4,000 | M | 9.25%, 2017 (a) | 4,310,000 | |
1,000 | M | 8.375%, 2018 (a) | 1,012,500 | |
18,311,719 |
31 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2010
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Media-Cable TV—8.3% | ||||
$ 6,250 | M | Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC, 9.375%, 2014 | $ 6,367,187 | |
3,025 | M | Cablevision Systems Corp., 8.625%, 2017 | 3,342,625 | |
1,000 | M | CCH II, LLC, 13.5%, 2016 | 1,192,500 | |
1,900 | M | Cequel Communications Holdings I, Inc., 8.625%, 2017 (a) | 2,014,000 | |
Clear Channel Worldwide: | ||||
2,500 | M | 9.25%, 2017 | 2,662,500 | |
4,925 | M | 9.25%, 2017 – Series “B” | 5,282,062 | |
Echostar DBS Corp.: | ||||
2,250 | M | 6.625%, 2014 | 2,356,875 | |
2,525 | M | 7.75%, 2015 | 2,704,906 | |
2,225 | M | Insight Communications Co., Inc., 9.375%, 2018 (a) | 2,375,187 | |
Quebecor Media, Inc.: | ||||
1,300 | M | 7.75%, 2016 | 1,347,125 | |
1,000 | M | 7.75%, 2016 | 1,036,250 | |
4,850 | M | UPC Germany GmbH, 8.125%, 2017 (a) | 5,068,250 | |
1,575 | M | Videotron LTEE, 6.375%, 2015 | 1,618,313 | |
4,650 | M | Virgin Media Finance, PLC, 9.5%, 2016 | 5,277,750 | |
42,645,530 | ||||
Media-Diversified—1.1% | ||||
2,475 | M | Entravision Communications Corp., 8.75%, 2017 (a) | 2,536,875 | |
1,225 | M | Interpublic Group of Cos., Inc., 10%, 2017 | 1,436,313 | |
1,700 | M | Lamar Media Corp., 7.875%, 2018 | 1,793,500 | |
MediaNews Group, Inc.: | ||||
2,625 | M | 6.875%, 2013 (b)(c) | 1,641 | |
3,100 | M | 6.375%, 2014 (b)(c) | 1,938 | |
5,770,267 | ||||
Metals/Mining—2.3% | ||||
2,750 | M | Metals USA, Inc., 11.125%, 2015 | 2,928,750 | |
Novelis, Inc.: | ||||
2,075 | M | 7.25%, 2015 | 2,121,688 | |
1,600 | M | 11.5%, 2015 | 1,836,000 | |
1,175 | M | Steel Dynamics, Inc., 7.625%, 2020 (a) | 1,224,938 | |
1,011 | M | Teck Resources, Ltd., 10.75%, 2019 | 1,275,050 | |
2,425 | M | Vedanta Resources, PLC, 9.5%, 2018 (a) | 2,631,125 | |
12,017,551 |
32 |
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—2.4% | ||||
$ 1,375 | M | Brandywine Operating Partnership, LP, 5.7%, 2017 | $ 1,394,313 | |
4,650 | M | CB Richard Ellis Service, 11.625%, 2017 | 5,405,625 | |
Developers Diversified Realty Corp.: | ||||
675 | M | 9.625%, 2016 | 753,868 | |
625 | M | 7.875%, 2020 | 648,711 | |
2,675 | M | Dupont Fabros Tech, LP, 8.5%, 2017 | 2,882,312 | |
1,000 | M | HRPT Properties Trust, 6.25%, 2017 | 1,050,548 | |
12,135,377 | ||||
Retail-General Merchandise—6.7% | ||||
3,075 | M | Federated Retail Holdings, Inc., 5.9%, 2016 | 3,290,250 | |
2,900 | M | HSN, Inc., 11.25%, 2016 | 3,320,500 | |
2,050 | M | J.C. Penney Corp., Inc., 7.95%, 2017 | 2,311,375 | |
Limited Brands, Inc.: | ||||
1,700 | M | 8.5%, 2019 | 1,984,750 | |
475 | M | 7%, 2020 | 515,375 | |
Macys Retail Holdings, Inc.: | ||||
2,875 | M | 7.45%, 2017 | 3,227,188 | |
1,050 | M | 6.65%, 2024 | 1,073,625 | |
3,525 | M | QVC, Inc., 7.5%, 2019 (a) | 3,701,250 | |
3,000 | M | Sears Holding Corp., 6.625%, 2018 (a) | 3,022,500 | |
2,050 | M | Susser Holdings & Finance, 8.5%, 2016 | 2,142,250 | |
4,900 | M | Toys R Us Property Co. I, Inc., 10.75%, 2017 | 5,561,500 | |
1,400 | M | Toys R Us Property Co. II, Inc., 8.5%, 2017 (a) | 1,487,500 | |
3,025 | M | Yankee Acquisition Corp., 8.5%, 2015 | 3,138,438 | |
34,776,501 | ||||
Services—2.3% | ||||
2,200 | M | Hertz Corp., 10.5%, 2016 | 2,348,500 | |
Iron Mountain, Inc.: | ||||
225 | M | 8.75%, 2018 | 239,906 | |
1,450 | M | 8%, 2020 | 1,538,813 | |
2,275 | M | Kar Holdings, Inc., 8.75%, 2014 | 2,380,219 | |
2,500 | M | PHH Corp., 9.25%, 2016 (a) | 2,612,500 | |
2,375 | M | Reliance Intermediate Holdings, LP, 9.5%, 2019 (a) | 2,529,375 | |
11,649,313 |
33 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2010
Principal | ||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||
Telecommunications—9.0% | ||||
Citizens Communications Co.: | ||||
$ 5,500 | M | 7.125%, 2019 | $ 5,665,000 | |
775 | M | 9%, 2031 | 830,219 | |
Frontier Communications Corp.: | ||||
50 | M | 7.875%, 2015 | 54,250 | |
1,875 | M | 8.125%, 2018 | 2,057,812 | |
1,250 | M | 8.5%, 2020 | 1,385,937 | |
2,125 | M | GCI, Inc., 8.625%, 2019 | 2,279,062 | |
5,575 | M | Inmarsat Finance, PLC, 7.375%, 2017 (a) | 5,853,750 | |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings, Ltd.: | ||||
750 | M | 9.5%, 2016 | 803,438 | |
725 | M | 8.5%, 2019 (a) | 790,250 | |
Nextel Communications, Inc.: | ||||
3,550 | M | 5.95%, 2014 | 3,550,000 | |
5,725 | M | 7.375%, 2015 | 5,782,250 | |
Qwest Communications International, Inc.: | ||||
3,500 | M | 7.5%, 2014 | 3,587,500 | |
2,125 | M | 8%, 2015 | 2,310,938 | |
1,275 | M | Sprint Capital Corp., 6.875%, 2028 | 1,173,000 | |
3,850 | Wind Acquisition Finance SA, 11.75%, 2017 (a) | 4,333,656 | ||
M | Windstream Corp.: | |||
3,100 | M | 8.625%, 2016 | 3,293,750 | |
1,550 | M | 7.875%, 2017 | 1,623,625 | |
1,025 | M | 7.75%, 2020 (a) | 1,037,813 | |
46,412,250 | ||||
Transportation—2.3% | ||||
2,475 | M | Aircastle, Ltd., 9.75%, 2018 (a) | 2,539,969 | |
3,350 | M | CHC Helicopter SA, 9.25%, 2020 (a) | 3,400,250 | |
Navios Maritime Holdings: | ||||
4,175 | M | 9.5%, 2014 | 4,279,375 | |
775 | M | 8.875%, 2017 (a) | 821,500 | |
925 | M | Teekay Corp., 8.5%, 2020 | 1,011,719 | |
12,052,813 | ||||
Utilities—4.4% | ||||
875 | M | AES Corp., 9.75%, 2016 | 1,010,625 | |
2,600 | M | Calpine Construction Finance Co., LP, 8%, 2016 (a) | 2,795,000 | |
225 | M | Calpine Corp., 7.875%, 2020 (a) | 232,312 | |
875 | M | CMS Energy Corp., 8.75%, 2019 | 1,049,142 |
34 |
Principal | ||||||
Amount | ||||||
or Shares | Security | Value | ||||
Utilities (continued) | ||||||
$ 5,250 | M | Dynegy Holdings, Inc., 7.75%, 2019 | $ 3,622,500 | |||
1,700 | M | Energy Future Holdings Corp., 10%, 2020 (a) | 1,696,192 | |||
3,475 | M | Intergen NV, 9%, 2017 (a) | 3,692,188 | |||
NRG Energy, Inc.: | ||||||
4,625 | M | 7.375%, 2017 | 4,752,188 | |||
1,375 | M | 8.5%, 2019 | 1,455,781 | |||
2,600 | M | NSG Holdings, LLC, 7.75%, 2025 (a) | 2,379,000 | |||
22,684,928 | ||||||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $476,114,050) | 499,662,502 | |||||
COMMON STOCKS—.0% | ||||||
Automotive—.0% | ||||||
37,387 | * | Safelite Glass Corporation – Class “B” (b) | 7,290 | |||
2,523 | * | Safelite Realty Corporation (b) | 25 | |||
7,315 | ||||||
Telecommunications—.0% | ||||||
8 | * | Viatel Holding (Bermuda), Ltd. (b) | — | |||
18,224 | * | World Access, In c. | 15 | |||
15 | ||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $385,770) | 7,330 | |||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS—3.4% | ||||||
Money Market Fund | ||||||
$ 17,660M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% | |||||
(cost $17,660,000) (d) | 17,660,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $494,159,820) | 100.4 | % | 517,329,832 | |||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.4 | ) | (1,931,829) | |||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $515,398,003 |
* Non-income producing
(a) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4).
(b) Securities valued at fair value (see Note 1A)
(c) In default as to principal and/or interest payment
(d) Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
35 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
FUND FOR INCOME
September 30, 2010
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes (see Note 1A). The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | ||||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | |||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||
Corporate Bonds | $ | — | $ | 499,656,173 | $ | 6,329 | $ | 499,662,502 | ||||
Common Stocks | 15 | — | 7,315 | 7,330 | ||||||||
Money Market Fund | 17,660,000 | — | — | 17,660,000 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 17,660,015 | $ | 499,656,173 | $ | 13,644 | $ | 517,329,832 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for the portfolio.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
36 |
The following is a reconciliation of Fund investments valued using Level 3 inputs for the period:
Investments | Investments | Investments | |||||||||||||
in | in Auction | in | Investments | ||||||||||||
Corporate | Rate | Common | in | ||||||||||||
Bonds | Securities | Stocks | Warrants | Total | |||||||||||
Balance, | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | $ | 2,750 | $ | 2,120,646 | $ | 14,045 | $ | — | $ | 2,137,441 | |||||
Net sales | — | (2,300,000) | (16,351) | (137,532) | (2,453,883) | ||||||||||
Change in unrealized | |||||||||||||||
appreciation | — | 179,354 | 227,018 | 13,240,676 | 13,647,048 | ||||||||||
Realized loss | — | — | (231,626) | (13,303,863) | (13,535,489) | ||||||||||
Transfer in and/or | |||||||||||||||
out of Level 3 | 3,579 | — | 14,229 | 200,719 | 218,527 | ||||||||||
Balance, | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | $ | 6,329 | $ | — | $ | 7,315 | $ | — | $ | 13,644 |
The following is a summary of Level 3 inputs by industry:
Automotive | $ | 7,315 | |
Health Care | 2,750 | ||
Media - Diversified | 3,579 | ||
$ | 13,644 |
See notes to financial statements | 37 |
Portfolio Composition (unaudited)
FUND FOR INCOME
The dollar weighted average of credit ratings of all bonds held by the Fund during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, computed on a monthly basis, are set forth below. This information reflects the average composition of the Fund’s assets during the 2010 fiscal year and is not necessarily representative of the Fund as of the end of its 2010 fiscal year, the current fiscal year or at any other time in the future.
Comparable Quality of | ||
Rated by | Unrated Securities to | |
Moody's | Bonds Rated by Moody's | |
Aa3 | 0.07% | 0.00% |
A1 | 0.09 | 0.00 |
Baa2 | 0.40 | 0.00 |
Baa3 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Ba1 | 2.78 | 0.00 |
Ba2 | 16.72 | 0.00 |
Ba3 | 11.86 | 0.00 |
B | 0.00 | 0.07 |
B- | 0.00 | 0.01 |
B1 | 18.75 | 0.00 |
B2 | 15.84 | 0.00 |
B3 | 20.70 | 0.00 |
Caa1 | 6.97 | 0.00 |
Caa2 | 1.67 | 0.00 |
Caa | 0.30 | 0.00 |
Ca | 0.77 | 0.00 |
38 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
TOTAL RETURN FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Total Return Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 9.4% for Class A shares and 8.6% for Class B shares, including dividends of 29.2 cents per share on Class A shares and 19.7 cents per share on Class B shares.
The Fund follows a strategy of diversifying its assets among stocks, bonds and money market instruments, with at least 50% normally invested in stocks and at least 35% invested in bonds, cash and money market instruments. During the period, the Fund had an average portfolio allocation of 58% in stocks, 40% in bonds and only 2% in cash and cash equivalents. The Fund’s asset allocation strategy worked well during the period, as both stocks and bonds generated good performance amid the improving economic environment as discussed below. The Fund also benefited from having a low level of cash in this environment.
Equities
During the reporting period, the equity markets settled into a more stable pattern of positive results, boosted by the slowly improving domestic economy. The Fund’s returns reflected that performance. However, the markets remained highly susceptible to short-term headlines, creating periods of high volatility. The environment remained more macro driven, as the Federal Reserve, the Obama administration and Congress continued to be aggressively involved in economic affairs, proposing new regulations and increasing government oversight of businesses. Many of these actions were perceived as being negative for business, impacting whole sectors or industries. Industries such as health care, energy, financials and education were greatly impacted by governmental initiatives, and saw their share prices affected during the period.
The Fund’s weightings in consumer staples and industrials increased throughout the year, as these sectors demonstrated solid growth in earnings and benefited from cost control programs. Overall stock selection and weightings benefited the Fund’s relative performance most notably within these sectors. Additionally, better stock selection also aided investments within utilities and materials.
Notable individual performers within consumer staples included shares of direct seller of beauty products and nutriceuticals Nu Skin Enterprises, spice and flavorings maker Mc-Cormick, and tobacco giant Altria Group. The Fund also benefited from the takeover of small-cap personal products maker Chattem by French pharmaceutical giant Sanofi-Aventis. Within industrials, shares of Honeywell, United Technologies, 3M, and Caterpillar were the top larger-cap companies. The overall top performers were two investments in ocean freight container leasing companies, TAL International and Textainer Group Holdings, which benefited from a strong resurgence of global commerce, positively impacting their pricing and utilization.
As in the prior year, the Fund remained underweight in the volatile energy sector, as natural gas remained plentiful and its pricing reflected that fact by dropping 30% since the beginning of 2010. Oil had its own volatile year, but remained only modestly above last year’s price levels. However, the energy sector performed well during the year and our relative underweight and poor stock selection hurt results. The Fund’s investments within
39 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
technology also detracted from results. Poor stock selection in the Fund’s larger-cap, longer-term holdings, such as Cisco Systems, Nokia, Hewlett Packard and Microsoft, hurt performance. In addition, a slowdown in government procurement impacted the results of the Fund’s investments in defense-related IT services firms.
The equity portion of the Fund maintained a diverse market capitalization allocation during the period, ending with 58% large cap, 14% mid cap and 28% small cap, according to Lipper’s market capitalization ranges. This is consistent with the Fund’s long-term strategy. While the large-cap segment lagged, the mid- and small-cap components delivered better results than the benchmark.
Fixed Income
The fixed income market had strong returns during the review period, gaining 8% as measured by the Bank of America Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government and Mortgage Index. The market benefited from the general decline in interest rates as the Federal Reserve remained focused on keeping rates low to stimulate economic growth. The yield on the two-year U.S. Treasury note fell to an all-time low, ending the review period at .4%. Longer-term interest rates also fell with the ten-year Treasury note yield moving from 3.3% to 2.5%. Among fixed income sectors, corporate bonds had the highest return, 12.6% according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch. The sector benefited from falling interest rates, strong company fundamentals, and positive (although slow) economic growth. Mortgage-backed bonds had the smallest gain, returning 5.9%. Fear of an increase in prepayments on mortgages due to record low mortgage rates caused the sector to underperform.
The Fund’s bond investments were primarily allocated among investment grade corporate bonds (25.5% of Fund assets), mortgage-backed securities (9.5%), and U.S. government and municipal obligations (4.9%). The positive impact of the Fund’s overweight in corporate bonds offset the negative impact of its underweight in the Treasury sector. The Fund benefited in particular from its corporate bond security selection.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
Sincerely,
40 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,008.82 | $6.85 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,018.25 | $6.88 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,004.65 | $10.35 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,014.74 | $10.40 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.36% for Class A shares and 2.06% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total market value of investments.
41 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Total Return Fund (Class A shares), the Bank of America (“BofA”) Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Master Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Total Return Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/00 with theoretical investments in the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Master Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Indices”). The BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Master Index tracks the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated investment grade publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market, including U.S. Treasury, quasi-government, corporate and residential mortgage pass-through securities. Qualifying securities must have an investment grade rating. Qualifying U.S. Treasuries must have at least one-year remaining term to final maturity, a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $1 billion. Qualifying U.S. agency, foreign government, supranational and corporate securities must have at least one-year remaining term to final maturity, a fixed coupon schedule and a minimum amount outstanding of $250 million. Qualifying residential mortgage pass-through securities include both fixed rate and hybrid securities publicly issued by U.S. agencies. 30-year, 20-year, 15-year and interest-only fixed rate mortgage pools are included in the Index provided they have at least one year remaining term to final maturity and a minimum amount outstanding of at least $5 billion per generic coupon and $250 million per production year within each generic coupon. Hybrid mortgage pools that reset versus 1-year CMT, 1 year LIBOR or 6-month LIBOR during their adjustable rate period are also included in the Index provided they have at least $2.5 billion per generic coupon and $250 million per production year within each generic coupon. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent a ll major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75% (prior to 6/17/02, the maximum sales charge was 6.25%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for Five Years and Ten Years would have been 1.87% and .97%, respectively. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for Five Years and Ten Years would have been 2.00% and 1.04%, respectively. Results represent past per formance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. Corporate, Government & Mortgage Master Index figures are from Bank of America Merrill Lynch & Co. and Standard & Poor’s 500 Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
42 |
Portfolio of Investments
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—59.4% | ||||
Consumer Discretionary—9.5% | ||||
78,300 | American Greetings Corporation – Class “A” | $ 1,455,597 | ||
48,000 | * | Big Lots, Inc. | 1,596,000 | |
43,600 | * | BorgWarner, Inc. | 2,294,232 | |
60,600 | Brown Shoe Company, Inc. | 695,082 | ||
103,100 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 1,635,166 | ||
29,400 | * | CEC Entertainment, Inc. | 1,009,302 | |
25,500 | Coach, Inc. | 1,095,480 | ||
51,100 | * | GameStop Corporation – Class “A” | 1,007,181 | |
27,200 | Guess?, Inc. | 1,105,136 | ||
143,400 | H&R Block, Inc. | 1,857,030 | ||
55,700 | Home Depot, Inc. | 1,764,576 | ||
46,000 | Limited Brands, Inc. | 1,231,880 | ||
92,500 | * | Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 1,332,925 | |
27,700 | McDonald’s Corporation | 2,063,927 | ||
144,000 | * | Morgans Hotel Group Company | 1,054,080 | |
147,500 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 2,626,975 | ||
9,200 | NIKE, Inc. – Class “B” | 737,288 | ||
164,400 | * | Ruby Tuesday, Inc. | 1,951,428 | |
47,000 | * | Steiner Leisure, Ltd. | 1,790,700 | |
228,600 | Stewart Enterprises, Inc – Class “A” | 1,232,154 | ||
49,800 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 2,069,688 | |
49,400 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 2,260,544 | ||
73,460 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 2,017,946 | ||
35,884,317 | ||||
Consumer Staples—7.6% | ||||
152,400 | Altria Group, Inc. | 3,660,648 | ||
36,600 | Avon Products, Inc. | 1,175,226 | ||
47,700 | Coca-Cola Company | 2,791,404 | ||
68,600 | CVS Caremark Corporation | 2,158,842 | ||
21,800 | * | Dole Food Company, Inc. | 199,470 | |
12,900 | Kellogg Company | 651,579 | ||
57,800 | Lance, Inc. | 1,231,140 | ||
30,600 | McCormick & Company, Inc. | 1,286,424 | ||
85,900 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,473,920 | ||
28,000 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 1,860,320 | ||
81,400 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 4,560,028 | ||
32,400 | Procter & Gamble Company | 1,943,028 |
43 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Consumer Staples (continued) | ||||
13,740 | Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | $ 341,851 | ||
50,100 | Walgreen Company | 1,678,350 | ||
53,400 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 2,857,968 | ||
28,870,198 | ||||
Energy—4.2% | ||||
20,900 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | 1,192,345 | ||
30,900 | ConocoPhillips | 1,774,587 | ||
27,200 | Ensco, PLC (ADR) | 1,216,656 | ||
49,727 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 3,072,631 | ||
1,897 | Hugoton Royalty Trust | 37,921 | ||
26,686 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 883,307 | ||
67,800 | Noble Corporation | 2,290,962 | ||
27,800 | Sasol, Ltd. (ADR) | 1,245,162 | ||
90,100 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 2,932,755 | ||
18,270 | * | Transocean, Ltd. | 1,174,578 | |
15,820,904 | ||||
Financials—7.4% | ||||
18,100 | American Express Company | 760,743 | ||
48,500 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 2,295,505 | ||
75,600 | Brookline Bancorp, Inc. | 754,488 | ||
23,292 | Capital One Financial Corporation | 921,198 | ||
36,150 | Discover Financial Services | 602,982 | ||
130,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 1,865,500 | ||
56,650 | First Mercury Financial Corporation | 571,032 | ||
100,700 | FirstMerit Corporation | 1,844,824 | ||
141,800 | Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. | 1,738,468 | ||
15,000 | IBERIABANK Corporation | 749,700 | ||
47,400 | Invesco, Ltd. | 1,006,302 | ||
63,800 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 2,428,866 | ||
55,700 | Morgan Stanley | 1,374,676 | ||
164,500 | New York Community Bancorp, Inc. | 2,673,125 | ||
93,200 | NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. | 1,176,184 | ||
65,300 | SPDR KBW Regional Banking (ETF) | 1,496,023 | ||
12,700 | SPDR S&P 500 Trust (ETF) | 1,449,324 | ||
122,572 | * | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 1,111,728 |
44 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Financials (continued) | |||||
36,500 | U.S. Bancorp | $789,130 | |||
79,800 | Urstadt Biddle Properties – Class “A” (REIT) | 1,442,784 | |||
35,800 | Wells Fargo & Company | 899,654 | |||
27,952,236 | |||||
Health Care—5.9% | |||||
56,200 | Abbott Laboratories | 2,935,888 | |||
17,000 | * | Amgen, Inc. | 936,870 | ||
18,500 | Baxter International, Inc. | 882,635 | |||
30,900 | * | Genzyme Corporation | 2,187,411 | ||
42,600 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 1,516,986 | ||
62,100 | Johnson & Johnson | 3,847,716 | |||
7,200 | * | Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings | 564,696 | ||
29,300 | Medtronic, Inc. | 983,894 | |||
35,700 | Merck & Company, Inc. | 1,314,117 | |||
151,280 | Pfizer, Inc. | 2,597,478 | |||
11,400 | * | PSS World Medical, Inc. | 243,732 | ||
42,200 | Sanofi-Aventis (ADR) | 1,403,150 | |||
23,000 | * | St. Jude Medical, Inc. | 904,820 | ||
38,400 | * | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 1,838,592 | ||
22,157,985 | |||||
Industrials—10.0% | |||||
31,700 | 3M Company | 2,748,707 | |||
29,000 | Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. | 1,010,360 | |||
45,904 | * | Altra Holdings, Inc. | 676,166 | ||
61,500 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 2,552,865 | ||
30,200 | Baldor Electric Company | 1,220,080 | |||
25,300 | Caterpillar, Inc. | 1,990,604 | |||
60,700 | * | Chicago Bridge & Iron Company NV – NY Shares | 1,484,115 | ||
29,200 | * | Esterline Technologies Corporation | 1,671,116 | ||
52,100 | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 710,644 | |||
43,200 | * | General Electric Company | 702,000 | ||
50,500 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 2,218,970 | |||
50,100 | IDEX Corporation | 1,779,051 | |||
17,700 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 1,261,656 | |||
64,500 | * | Mobile Mini, Inc. | 989,430 | ||
19,600 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | 1,188,348 | |||
61,647 | * | PGT, Inc. | 140,555 | ||
31,300 | * | Pinnacle Airlines Corporation | 169,959 | ||
26,800 | Raytheon Company | 1,225,028 |
45 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Industrials (continued) | ||||
35,310 | Republic Services, Inc. | $ 1,076,602 | ||
45,600 | Snap-on, Inc. | 2,120,856 | ||
148,500 | TAL International Group, Inc. | 3,596,670 | ||
70,500 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 1,885,170 | ||
75,075 | Tyco International, Ltd. | 2,757,505 | ||
36,400 | United Technologies Corporation | 2,592,772 | ||
37,769,229 | ||||
Information Technology—9.9% | ||||
57,700 | * | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 1,298,827 | |
166,300 | * | Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. | 971,192 | |
24,500 | * | CACI International, Inc. – Class “A” | 1,108,870 | |
109,900 | * | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2,406,810 | |
133,300 | * | EMC Corporation | 2,707,323 | |
55,100 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 2,318,057 | ||
65,700 | Intel Corporation | 1,263,411 | ||
38,500 | International Business Machines Corporation | 5,164,390 | ||
57,000 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 666,330 | ||
164,800 | Microsoft Corporation | 4,035,952 | ||
122,500 | National Semiconductor Corporation | 1,564,325 | ||
68,450 | * | NCI, Inc. – Class “A” | 1,295,074 | |
90,100 | * | Parametric Technology Corporation | 1,760,554 | |
76,400 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 3,447,168 | ||
59,975 | * | SRA International, Inc. – Class “A” | 1,182,707 | |
115,700 | * | Symantec Corporation | 1,755,169 | |
71,300 | Tyco Electronics, Ltd. | 2,083,386 | ||
132,576 | Western Union Company | 2,342,618 | ||
37,372,163 | ||||
Materials—3.2% | ||||
62,000 | Bemis Company, Inc. | 1,968,500 | ||
46,200 | Celanese Corporation – Series “A” | 1,483,020 | ||
29,000 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 2,476,310 | ||
66,600 | Olin Corporation | 1,342,656 | ||
14,600 | Praxair, Inc. | 1,317,796 | ||
91,600 | RPM International, Inc. | 1,824,672 | ||
92,550 | Temple-Inland, Inc. | 1,726,983 | ||
12,139,937 |
46 |
Shares or | |||||
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
Telecommunication Services—1.5% | |||||
82,400 | AT&T, Inc. | $ 2,356,640 | |||
101,100 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 3,294,849 | |||
5,651,489 | |||||
Utilities—.2% | |||||
32,100 | Atmos Energy Corporation | 938,925 | |||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $196,917,278) | 224,557,383 | ||||
CORPORATE BONDS—27.1% | |||||
Aerospace/Defense—.9% | |||||
$ 1,000 | M | BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 4.95%, 2014 (a) | 1,104,450 | ||
1,000 | M | Lockheed Martin Corp., 4.25%, 2019 | 1,092,202 | ||
1,000 | M | United Technologies Corp., 6.125%, 2019 | 1,239,265 | ||
3,435,917 | |||||
Agriculture—.6% | |||||
1,000 | M | Cargill, Inc., 6%, 2017 (a) | 1,183,999 | ||
1,000 | M | Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 | 1,065,090 | ||
2,249,089 | |||||
Automotive—.3% | |||||
1,000 | M | Daimler Chrysler NA, LLC, 6.5%, 2013 | 1,144,645 | ||
Chemicals—.3% | |||||
1,000 | M | Chevron Phillips Chemicals, Co., LLC, 8.25%, 2019 (a) | 1,267,679 | ||
Consumer Durables—.5% | |||||
1,000 | M | Black & Decker Corp., 8.95%, 2014 | 1,233,557 | ||
700 | M | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 6.75%, 2012 | 749,450 | ||
1,983,007 | |||||
Energy—4.1% | |||||
1,000 | M | Canadian Natural Resources, Ltd., 5.9%, 2018 | 1,167,705 | ||
500 | M | Canadian Oil Sands, Ltd., 7.75%, 2019 (a) | 621,305 | ||
1,000 | M | ConocoPhillips, 5.75%, 2019 | 1,201,562 | ||
1,000 | M | DCP Midstream, LLC, 9.75%, 2019 (a) | 1,332,721 | ||
500 | M | Energy Transfer Partners, LP, 8.5%, 2014 | 594,120 | ||
1,000 | M | Marathon Oil Corp., 7.5%, 2019 | 1,282,581 | ||
960 | M | Maritime & Northeast Pipeline, LLC, 7.5%, 2014 (a) | 1,049,348 | ||
1,000 | M | Nabors Industries, Inc., 5.375%, 2012 | 1,060,621 |
47 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2010
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
Energy (continued) | |||||
$ 1,000 | M | Nexen, Inc., 6.4%, 2037 | $ 1,093,315 | ||
1,000 | M | Northern Border Partners, LP, 7.1%, 2011 | 1,025,430 | ||
1,000 | M | Shell International Finance BV, 3.25%, 2015 | 1,064,047 | ||
500 | M | Spectra Energy Capital, LLC, 6.2%, 2018 | 585,639 | ||
1,000 | M | Suncor Energy, Inc., 6.1%, 2018 | 1,172,354 | ||
1,000 | M | Valero Energy Corp., 9.375%, 2019 | 1,279,027 | ||
1,000 | M | Weatherford International, Inc., 5.125%, 2020 | 1,024,264 | ||
15,554,039 | |||||
Financial Services—2.4% | |||||
1,000 | M | American Express Co., 7%, 2018 | 1,206,185 | ||
1,000 | M | Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 5.3%, 2020 | 1,106,927 | ||
1,000 | M | BlackRock, Inc., 5%, 2019 | 1,104,416 | ||
1,000 | M | Caterpillar Financial Services Corp., 5.85%, 2017 | 1,177,233 | ||
1,000 | M | CoBank, ACB, 7.875%, 2018 (a) | 1,162,298 | ||
1,000 | M | General Electric Capital Corp., 5.625%, 2017 | 1,118,729 | ||
1,000 | M | Harley-Davidson Funding Corp., 5.75%, 2014 (a) | 1,067,611 | ||
1,000 | M | Prudential Financial Corp., 6%, 2017 | 1,130,244 | ||
9,073,643 | |||||
Financials—2.9% | |||||
1,000 | M | Barclays Bank, PLC, 5.125%, 2020 | 1,083,159 | ||
1,000 | M | Citigroup, Inc., 6.375%, 2014 | 1,111,432 | ||
1,000 | M | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 6.45%, 2036 | 1,006,082 | ||
1,000 | M | JPMorgan Chase & Co., 6%, 2018 | 1,143,691 | ||
1,000 | M | Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 5%, 2015 | 1,065,999 | ||
1,000 | M | Morgan Stanley, 5.3%, 2013 | 1,077,543 | ||
1,000 | M | Siemens Financieringsmaatschappij NV, 5.75%, 2016 (a) | 1,178,992 | ||
1,000 | M | SunTrust Banks, Inc., 6%, 2017 | 1,084,616 | ||
1,000 | M | UBS AG, 5.875%, 2017 | 1,133,171 | ||
1,000 | M | Wells Fargo & Co., 5.625%, 2017 | 1,140,695 | ||
11,025,380 | |||||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco—2.8% | |||||
1,000 | M | Altria Group, Inc., 9.7%, 2018 | 1,355,640 | ||
1,000 | M | Anheuser-Busch InBev Worldwide, Inc., 6.875%, 2019 (a) | 1,246,694 | ||
1,000 | M | Bottling Group, LLC, 5.125%, 2019 | 1,149,557 | ||
1,000 | M | Bunge Limited Finance Corp., 5.35%, 2014 | 1,068,411 | ||
1,000 | M | ConAgra Foods, Inc., 5.875%, 2014 | 1,142,634 | ||
1,000 | M | Corn Products International, Inc., 4.625%, 2020 | 1,025,012 |
48 |
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
Food/Beverage/Tobacco (continued) | |||||
$ 1,000 | M | Diageo Capital, PLC, 5.75%, 2017 | $ 1,181,950 | ||
1,000 | M | Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., 6.82%, 2018 | 1,239,140 | ||
1,000 | M | Philip Morris International, Inc., 5.65%, 2018 | 1,172,656 | ||
10,581,694 | |||||
Forest Products/Containers—.2% | |||||
650 | M | International Paper Co., 9.375%, 2019 | 844,560 | ||
Health Care—1.3% | |||||
1,000 | M | Biogen IDEC, Inc., 6.875%, 2018 | 1,175,176 | ||
1,000 | M | Novartis, 5.125%, 2019 | 1,150,110 | ||
1,000 | M | Pfizer, Inc., 6.2%, 2019 | 1,233,349 | ||
1,000 | M | Roche Holdings, Inc., 6%, 2019 (a) | 1,213,525 | ||
4,772,160 | |||||
Information Technology—1.5% | |||||
1,000 | M | Adobe Systems, Inc., 4.75%, 2020 | 1,078,420 | ||
1,000 | M | Dell, Inc., 5.875%, 2019 | 1,162,403 | ||
1,000 | M | International Business Machines Corp., 8.375%, 2019 | 1,400,327 | ||
1,000 | M | Pitney Bowes, Inc., 5%, 2015 | 1,081,107 | ||
1,000 | M | Xerox Corp., 5.5%, 2012 | 1,064,429 | ||
5,786,686 | |||||
Manufacturing—.9% | |||||
1,000 | M | Ingersoll-Rand Global Holdings Co., 6.875%, 2018 | 1,216,174 | ||
1,000 | M | John Deere Capital Corp., 5.35%, 2018 | 1,160,798 | ||
1,000 | M | Johnson Controls, Inc., 5%, 2020 | 1,101,100 | ||
3,478,072 | |||||
Media-Broadcasting—1.6% | |||||
1,000 | M | British Sky Broadcasting Group, PLC, 9.5%, 2018 (a) | 1,367,521 | ||
1,000 | M | Comcast Corp., 5.15%, 2020 | 1,094,955 | ||
Cox Communications, Inc.: | |||||
500 | M | 5.5%, 2015 | 563,300 | ||
500 | M | 8.375%, 2039 (a) | 673,379 | ||
1,000 | M | DirecTV Holdings, LLC, 7.625%, 2016 | 1,116,285 | ||
1,000 | M | Time Warner Cable, Inc., 6.2%, 2013 | 1,127,270 | ||
5,942,710 |
49 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2010
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
Media-Diversified—.5% | |||||
$ 1,000 | M | McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc., 5.9%, 2017 | $ 1,131,235 | ||
500 | M | News America, Inc., 5.3%, 2014 | 564,832 | ||
1,696,067 | |||||
Metals/Mining—1.5% | |||||
1,000 | M | Alcoa, Inc., 6.15%, 2020 | 1,030,040 | ||
1,000 | M | ArcelorMittal, 6.125%, 2018 | 1,083,178 | ||
1,000 | M | Newmont Mining Corp., 5.125%, 2019 | 1,120,707 | ||
1,000 | M | Rio Tinto Finance USA, Ltd., 6.5%, 2018 | 1,207,808 | ||
1,000 | M | Vale Overseas, Ltd., 5.625%, 2019 | 1,107,416 | ||
5,549,149 | |||||
Real Estate Investment Trusts—.6% | |||||
1,000 | M | ProLogis, 7.625%, 2014 | 1,081,621 | ||
1,000 | M | Simon Property Group, LP, 5.75%, 2015 | 1,140,022 | ||
2,221,643 | |||||
Retail General Merchandise—.3% | |||||
1,000 | M | Home Depot, Inc., 5.875%, 2036 | 1,069,749 | ||
Telecommunications—.9% | |||||
1,000 | M | AT&T, Inc., 5.8%, 2019 | 1,194,068 | ||
800 | M | GTE Corp., 6.84%, 2018 | 949,734 | ||
1,000 | M | Verizon Communications, Inc., 8.75%, 2018 | 1,362,827 | ||
3,506,629 | |||||
Transportation—.2% | |||||
500 | M | GATX Corp., 8.75%, 2014 | 591,039 | ||
Utilities—2.5% | |||||
1,000 | M | Atmos Energy Corp., 8.5%, 2019 | 1,302,020 | ||
1,000 | M | Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, 7.125%, 2018 | 1,288,703 | ||
1,000 | M | E. ON International Finance BV, 5.8%, 2018 (a) | 1,185,197 | ||
1,000 | M | Electricite de France SA, 6.5%, 2019 (a) | 1,223,327 | ||
1,000 | M | Exelon Generation Co., LLC, 6.2%, 2017 | 1,174,095 | ||
649 | M | Great River Energy Co., 5.829%, 2017 (a) | 729,376 | ||
1,000 | M | Ohio Power Co., 5.375%, 2021 | 1,143,115 | ||
1,000 | M | Sempra Energy, 9.8%, 2019 | 1,396,322 | ||
9,442,155 |
50 |
Principal | |||||
Amount | Security | Value | |||
Waste Management—.3% | |||||
$ 1,000 | M | Allied Waste NA, Inc., 7.125%, 2016 | $ 1,072,491 | ||
Total Value of Corporate Bonds (cost $92,529,361) | 102,288,203 | ||||
RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE-BACKED | |||||
SECURITIES—9.2% | |||||
Fannie Mae—5.5% | |||||
10,294 | M | 5.5%, 5/1/2033 – 10/1/2039 | 11,028,217 | ||
5,752 | M | 6%, 5/1/2036 – 8/1/2037 | 6,206,214 | ||
1,879 | M | 6.5%, 11/1/2033 – 6/1/2036 | 2,067,489 | ||
1,259 | M | 7%, 3/1/2032 – 8/1/2032 | 1,450,355 | ||
20,752,275 | |||||
Freddie Mac—3.7% | |||||
1,000 | M | 4.5%, 9/1/2040 | 1,041,417 | ||
9,505 | M | 5.5%, 5/1/2038 – 1/1/2040 | 10,089,781 | ||
2,604 | M | 6%, 9/1/2032 – 5/1/2038 | 2,815,742 | ||
13,946,940 | |||||
Total Value of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (cost $33,311,174) | 34,699,215 | ||||
MUNICIPAL BONDS—1.8% | |||||
1,000 | M | Atlanta GA Wtr. & Wastewtr. Rev. Series “A”, 6%, 2029 | 1,130,320 | ||
1,000 | M | Lower Colorado River Auth. TX Rev., 5.5%, 2033 | 1,096,230 | ||
1,000 | M | Massachusetts St. Hlth. & Educ. Facs. Series “A”, 5%, 2034 | 1,109,260 | ||
1,000 | M | Minnesota State Ref. Various Purpose, Series “H”, 5%, 2029 | 1,140,500 | ||
1,000 | M | North Carolina State Pub. Impt. Series “A”, 5%, 2027 | 1,167,790 | ||
1,000 | M | Salt River Proj. AZ Agric. Impt. & Pwr. Dist. Elec. Sys. | |||
Rev. Series “A”, 5%, 2029 | 1,113,100 | ||||
Total Value of Municipal Bonds (cost $6,273,372) | 6,757,200 | ||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY | |||||
OBLIGATIONS—1.4% | |||||
Fannie Mae: | |||||
1,000 | M | 2.5%, 2014 | 1,050,340 | ||
1,000 | M | 1.625%, 2015 | 1,000,815 | ||
1,000 | M | Federal Farm Credit Bank, 1.75%, 2013 | 1,022,483 |
51 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
TOTAL RETURN FUND
September 30, 2010
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Tennessee Valley Authority: | ||||||
$ 1,000 | M | 4.375%, 2015 | $ 1,128,768 | |||
1,000 | M | 4.5%, 2018 | 1,147,366 | |||
Total Value of U.S. Government Agency Obligations (cost $5,038,720) | 5,349,772 | |||||
U.S. GOVERNMENT FDIC | ||||||
GUARANTEED DEBT—.3% | ||||||
Financials | ||||||
1,000 | M | Citigroup Funding, Inc., 1.875%, 2012 (cost $1,002,718) | 1,026,034 | |||
SHORT-TERM CORPORATE NOTES—1.4% | ||||||
Money Market Fund | ||||||
5,300 | M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% | ||||
(cost $5,300,000) (b) | 5,300,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $340,372,623) | 100.6 | % | 379,977,807 | |||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.6 | ) | (2,152,819) | |||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $377,824,988 |
* Non-income producing
(a) Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of Securities Act of 1933 (see Note 4).
(b) Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
Summary of Abbreviations: | |
ADR | American Depositary Receipts |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
52 |
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | ||||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | |||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 224,557,383 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 224,557,383 | ||||
Corporate Bonds | — | 102,288,203 | — | 102,288,203 | ||||||||
Residential Mortgage-Backed | ||||||||||||
Securities | — | 34,699,215 | — | 34,699,215 | ||||||||
Municipal Bonds | — | 6,757,200 | — | 6,757,200 | ||||||||
U.S. Government Agency | ||||||||||||
Obligations | — | 5,349,772 | — | 5,349,772 | ||||||||
U.S. Government FDIC | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed Debt | — | 1,026,034 | — | 1,026,034 | ||||||||
Money Market Fund | 5,300,000 | — | — | 5,300,000 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 229,857,383 | $ | 150,120,424 | $ | — | $ | 379,977,807 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for common stocks and corporate bonds.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
See notes to financial statements | 53 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
VALUE FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Value Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 9.8% for Class A shares and 9.0% for Class B shares, including dividends of 9.3 cents per share on Class A shares and 4.9 cents per share on Class B shares.
During the review period, the equity markets settled into a more stable pattern of positive results, boosted by a slowly improving economy. The Fund’s returns reflected that performance. However, the markets remained highly susceptible to short-term headlines, creating periods of high volatility. The environment remained more macro driven, as the Federal Reserve, the Obama administration and Congress continued to be aggressively involved in economic affairs, proposing new regulations and increasing government oversight of businesses. Many of those actions have taken a negative tone, which hurt certain sectors, including health care and financials.
The materials sector provided the highest return for the Fund, as its holdings in companies such as chemical giant DuPont and packaging companies Sonoco Products and Bemis led the way. Consumer staples was also an area of strength for the Fund reflecting good performance from packaged food companies like Sara Lee and Kraft Foods, as well as Ruddick, which operates the Harris & Teeter grocery chain in the southeast U.S. Other holdings that were among the most positive contributors for the review period included discount retailer Family Dollar Stores and communications giant Verizon Communications.
On a relative basis, the financials sector was the Fund’s top performer. The financials sector was the only major sector of the S&P 500 Index to generate a negative return during the review period. The Fund’s holdings in the sector, however, managed to turn in a positive return due to holdings in companies such as insurer Erie Indemnity, insurer and asset manager Ameriprise Financial, and real estate investment trusts Plum Creek Timber and First Potomac Realty.
The information technology sector was the Fund’s weakest sector on a relative basis compared with the S&P 500 Index. While part of the reason was that the Fund did not own several high-flying momentum stocks that are part of the S&P 500 Index, it also reflected poor performance from holdings such as mobile phone maker Nokia and semiconductor producer Intersil.
The Fund benefited from its multi-cap approach during the review period, as small-and mid-cap stocks performed better than large caps. The Fund carries a lower weighting in large caps than does the Index.
54 |
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
Sincerely,
55 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
VALUE FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $990.72 | $6.94 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,018.10 | $7.03 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $986.97 | $10.41 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,014.59 | $10.56 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.39% for Class A shares and 2.09% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total market value of investments.
56 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
VALUE FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Value Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Value Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/00 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the li ne graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75% (prior to 6/17/02 the maximum sales charge was 6.25%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
57 |
Portfolio of Investments
VALUE FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
COMMON STOCKS—95.5% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary—12.1% | |||||
132,600 | American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | $ 1,983,696 | |||
50,400 | Best Buy Company, Inc. | 2,057,832 | |||
38,800 | Bob Evans Farms, Inc. | 1,089,116 | |||
52,100 | Carnival Corporation | 1,990,741 | |||
76,800 | Cinemark Holdings, Inc. | 1,236,480 | |||
101,400 | Comcast Corporation – Special Shares “A” | 1,724,814 | |||
40,300 | Fortune Brands, Inc. | 1,983,969 | |||
57,000 | Genuine Parts Company | 2,541,630 | |||
126,600 | H&R Block, Inc. | 1,639,470 | |||
71,700 | Home Depot, Inc. | 2,271,456 | |||
78,700 | J.C. Penney Company, Inc. | 2,139,066 | |||
119,300 | Lowe’s Companies, Inc. | 2,659,197 | |||
88,100 | Macy’s, Inc. | 2,034,229 | |||
26,900 | McDonald’s Corporation | 2,004,319 | |||
83,400 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 1,485,354 | |||
35,900 | Omnicom Group, Inc. | 1,417,332 | |||
128,400 | * | Ruby Tuesday, Inc. | 1,524,108 | ||
126,000 | Stage Stores, Inc. | 1,638,000 | |||
88,900 | Staples, Inc. | 1,859,788 | |||
64,633 | Time Warner, Inc. | 1,981,001 | |||
113,400 | Walt Disney Company | 3,754,674 | |||
32,620 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 896,071 | |||
41,912,343 | |||||
Consumer Staples—17.8% | |||||
60,400 | Archer-Daniels-Midland Company | 1,927,968 | |||
88,800 | Avon Products, Inc. | 2,851,368 | |||
27,700 | Clorox Company | 1,849,252 | |||
74,600 | Coca-Cola Company | 4,365,592 | |||
74,500 | ConAgra Foods, Inc. | 1,634,530 | |||
47,800 | Costco Wholesale Corporation | 3,082,622 | |||
68,800 | CVS/Caremark Corporation | 2,165,136 | |||
54,500 | Diageo, PLC (ADR) | 3,761,045 | |||
44,300 | H.J. Heinz Company | 2,098,491 | |||
48,400 | Hershey Corporation | 2,303,356 | |||
73,100 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4,755,155 | |||
169,700 | Kraft Foods, Inc. – Class “A” | 5,236,942 | |||
92,200 | Kroger Company | 1,997,052 | |||
64,700 | Lance, Inc. | 1,378,110 | |||
28,600 | McCormick & Company, Inc. | 1,202,344 |
58 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Consumer Staples (continued) | |||||
79,013 | PepsiCo, Inc. | $ 5,249,624 | |||
79,600 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 4,459,192 | |||
26,600 | Procter & Gamble Company | 1,595,202 | |||
57,450 | Safeway, Inc. | 1,215,642 | |||
88,000 | Walgreen Company | 2,948,000 | |||
104,800 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 5,608,896 | |||
61,685,519 | |||||
Energy—8.2% | |||||
58,917 | Chevron Corporation | 4,775,223 | |||
69,700 | ConocoPhillips | 4,002,871 | |||
40,300 | Devon Energy Corporation | 2,609,022 | |||
31,300 | Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. | 2,121,201 | |||
54,500 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 3,367,555 | |||
27,700 | Hess Corporation | 1,637,624 | |||
105,600 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 3,495,360 | |||
62,700 | Royal Dutch Shell, PLC – Class “A” (ADR) | 3,780,810 | |||
60,000 | Tidewater, Inc. | 2,688,600 | |||
28,478,266 | |||||
Financials—14.0% | |||||
38,300 | ACE, Ltd. | 2,230,975 | |||
54,300 | Allstate Corporation | 1,713,165 | |||
42,700 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 2,020,991 | |||
45,200 | Aspen Insurance Holdings, Ltd. | 1,368,656 | |||
147,800 | Bank Mutual Corporation | 767,082 | |||
130,887 | Bank of America Corporation | 1,715,929 | |||
97,728 | Bank of New York Mellon Corporation | 2,553,633 | |||
42,403 | Capital One Financial Corporation | 1,677,039 | |||
48,656 | Chubb Corporation | 2,772,905 | |||
65,847 | Cincinnati Financial Corporation | 1,899,686 | |||
47,700 | Comerica, Inc. | 1,772,055 | |||
40,200 | EMC Insurance Group, Inc. | 857,064 | |||
85,900 | First Potomac Realty Trust (REIT) | 1,288,500 | |||
95,800 | FirstMerit Corporation | 1,755,056 | |||
136,600 | Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. | 1,674,716 | |||
33,600 | IBERIABANK Corporation | 1,679,328 | |||
91,900 | Invesco, Ltd. | 1,951,037 | |||
216,600 | Investors Real Estate Trust (REIT) | 1,815,108 | |||
103,100 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 3,925,017 | |||
63,500 | Morgan Stanley | 1,567,180 |
59 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
VALUE FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Financials (continued) | |||||
136,100 | NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. | $ 1,717,582 | |||
145,300 | People’s United Financial, Inc. | 1,901,977 | |||
31,900 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 1,655,929 | |||
59,800 | Protective Life Corporation | 1,301,248 | |||
53,000 | Tower Group, Inc. | 1,237,550 | |||
103,000 | Wells Fargo & Company | 2,588,390 | |||
118,400 | Westfield Financial, Inc. | 923,520 | |||
48,331,318 | |||||
Health Care—8.7% | |||||
105,800 | Abbott Laboratories | 5,526,992 | |||
42,800 | Baxter International, Inc. | 2,041,988 | |||
23,500 | Becton, Dickinson & Company | 1,741,350 | |||
18,200 | Covidien, PLC | 731,458 | |||
62,500 | GlaxoSmithKline, PLC (ADR) | 2,470,000 | |||
97,900 | Johnson & Johnson | 6,065,884 | |||
70,600 | Medtronic, Inc. | 2,370,748 | |||
59,911 | Merck & Company. Inc. | 2,205,324 | |||
57,100 | Novartis AG (ADR) | 3,292,957 | |||
205,900 | Pfizer, Inc. | 3,535,303 | |||
29,982,004 | |||||
Industrials—11.8% | |||||
38,600 | 3M Company | 3,347,006 | |||
39,500 | ABM Industries, Inc. | 852,805 | |||
31,500 | Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. | 1,097,460 | |||
33,600 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 1,394,736 | ||
50,400 | Avery Dennison Corporation | 1,870,848 | |||
27,600 | Baldor Electric Company | 1,115,040 | |||
58,800 | Con-way, Inc. | 1,822,212 | |||
60,200 | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 1,824,060 | |||
51,500 | Dover Corporation | 2,688,815 | |||
55,400 | Equifax, Inc. | 1,728,480 | |||
45,100 | General Dynamics Corporation | 2,832,731 | |||
156,800 | General Electric Company | 2,548,000 | |||
75,500 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 3,317,470 | |||
57,900 | Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | 2,722,458 | |||
59,500 | ITT Corporation | 2,786,385 | |||
23,500 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 1,675,080 | |||
51,600 | Pitney Bowes, Inc. | 1,103,208 |
60 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Industrials (continued) | |||||
47,800 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | $ 1,278,172 | |||
36,075 | Tyco International, Ltd. | 1,325,035 | |||
50,400 | United Parcel Service, Inc. – Class “B” | 3,361,176 | |||
40,691,177 | |||||
Information Technology—8.9% | |||||
83,700 | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 3,517,911 | |||
76,400 | AVX Corporation | 1,055,848 | |||
62,265 | Bel Fuse, Inc. – Class “B” | 1,296,357 | |||
56,900 | * | Electronic Arts, Inc. | 934,867 | ||
91,800 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 3,862,026 | |||
83,700 | Intel Corporation | 1,609,551 | |||
140,100 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 1,637,769 | |||
58,225 | Methode Electronics, Inc. | 528,683 | |||
174,200 | Microsoft Corporation | 4,266,158 | |||
86,800 | Molex, Inc. | 1,816,724 | |||
121,500 | National Semiconductor Corporation | 1,551,555 | |||
132,300 | Nokia Corporation – Class “A” (ADR) | 1,326,969 | |||
47,700 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 2,152,224 | |||
72,000 | Texas Instruments, Inc. | 1,954,080 | |||
51,275 | Tyco Electronics, Ltd. | 1,498,255 | |||
100,600 | Western Union Company | 1,777,602 | |||
30,786,579 | |||||
Materials—5.4% | |||||
10,900 | Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. | 902,738 | |||
76,200 | Alcoa, Inc. | 922,782 | |||
91,800 | Bemis Company, Inc. | 2,914,650 | |||
22,600 | Compass Minerals International, Inc. | 1,731,612 | |||
109,100 | Dow Chemical Company | 2,995,886 | |||
78,500 | DuPont (E.I.) de Nemours & Company | 3,502,670 | |||
107,500 | Glatfelter | 1,307,200 | |||
13,500 | H.B. Fuller Company | 268,245 | |||
26,800 | PPG Industries, Inc. | 1,951,040 | |||
62,300 | Sonoco Products Company | 2,083,312 | |||
18,580,135 |
61 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
VALUE FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares or | ||||||
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Telecommunication Services—4.1% | ||||||
172,830 | AT&T, Inc. | $ 4,942,938 | ||||
29,045 | CenturyTel, Inc. | 1,146,116 | ||||
23,900 | Telephone & Data Systems, Inc. | 783,920 | ||||
47,000 | Telephone & Data Systems, Inc. – Special Shares | 1,332,450 | ||||
189,128 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 6,163,681 | ||||
14,369,105 | ||||||
Utilities—4.5% | ||||||
50,900 | American Electric Power Company, Inc. | 1,844,107 | ||||
48,700 | Duke Energy Corporation | 862,477 | ||||
73,650 | MDU Resources Group, Inc. | 1,469,317 | ||||
43,600 | NextEra Energy, Inc. | 2,371,404 | ||||
130,300 | NiSource, Inc. | 2,267,220 | ||||
36,800 | ONEOK, Inc. | 1,657,472 | ||||
87,600 | Portland General Electric Company | 1,776,528 | ||||
56,300 | Southwest Gas Corporation | 1,891,117 | ||||
61,700 | Vectren Corporation | 1,596,179 | ||||
15,735,821 | ||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $308,046,497) | 330,552,267 | |||||
PREFERRED STOCKS—.4% | ||||||
Telecommunication Services | ||||||
49,500 | AT&T, Inc., 6.375%, 2056 (cost $1,235,523) | 1,343,925 | ||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS—4.0% | ||||||
Money Market Fund | ||||||
$ 13,780 | M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% | ||||
(cost $13,780,000)** | 13,780,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $323,062,020) | 99.9 | % | 345,676,192 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | .1 | 182,201 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $345,858,393 |
62 |
* Non-income producing
** Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
Summary of Abbreviations:
ADR American Depositary Receipts
REIT Real Estate Investment Trust
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | ||||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | |||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 330,552,267 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 330,552,267 | ||||
Preferred Stocks | 1,343,925 | — | — | 1,343,925 | ||||||||
Money Market Fund | 13,780,000 | — | — | 13,780,000 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 345,676,192 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 345,676,192 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for the portfolio.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
See notes to financial statements | 63 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
BLUE CHIP FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Blue Chip Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 6.4% for Class A shares and 5.6% for Class B shares, including dividends of 19.7 cents per share on Class A shares and 7.0 cents per share on Class B shares.
During the review period, the equity markets settled into a more stable pattern of positive results, boosted by a slowly improving economy. The Fund’s returns reflected that performance. However, the markets remained highly susceptible to short-term headlines, creating periods of high volatility. The environment remained more macro driven, as the Federal Reserve, the Obama administration and Congress continued to be aggressively involved in economic affairs, proposing new regulations and increasing government oversight of businesses. Many of these actions have taken a negative tone, which hurt certain sectors, including health care and financials.
The Fund’s return lagged the S&P 500 Index during the review period, as its holdings in the information technology and consumer discretionary sectors failed to keep pace. To a large degree, it reflected the Fund’s discipline of not chasing high-flying stocks without regard to their valuation. In addition, shares in holdings such as mobile phone maker Nokia, software giant Microsoft, and desktop publishing software developer Adobe Systems detracted from performance. And while the Fund benefited from a 50% gain in Apple, its weighting was roughly half of its weight in the benchmark Index. Within consumer discretionary, holdings in shares of tax preparation firm H&R Block and retailers such as Kohl’s and Staples performed poorly and caused the Fund to lag in the sector relative to the S&P 500 Index. Similar to technology, the Fund was also underexposed to many momentum stocks that drove the performance of the Index.
Another headwind faced by the Fund is that it focuses primarily on the large-cap sector of the market, which has generally not kept up with mid- and small-cap stocks. The Fund had a greater percentage of large-cap holdings than the S&P 500 Index.
Relative to the S&P 500 Index, the financials sector was the top performer for the Fund. The financials sector was the only major sector of the S&P 500 Index to generate a negative return during the review period. The Fund’s holdings in the sector, however, managed to turn in a slightly positive return due to solid performance by companies such as insurer and asset manager Ameriprise Financial, Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway, and American Express.
64 |
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
Sincerely,
65
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
BLUE CHIP FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $966.86 | $7.25 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,017.70 | $7.44 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $963.46 | $10.68 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,014.19 | $10.96 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.47% for Class A shares and 2.17% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total market value of investments.
66 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
BLUE CHIP FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Blue Chip Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Blue Chip Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/00 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75% (prior to 6/17/02, the maximum sales charge was 6.25%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for Five Years and Ten Years would have been (1.47%) and (3.65%), respectively. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for Five Years and Ten Years would have been (1.39%) and (3.58%), respectively. Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
67 |
Portfolio of Investments
BLUE CHIP FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
COMMON STOCKS—99.2% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary—9.1% | |||||
56,800 | Best Buy Company, Inc. | $ 2,319,144 | |||
173,850 | Comcast Corporation – Special Class “A” | 2,957,189 | |||
147,400 | H&R Block, Inc. | 1,908,830 | |||
81,000 | Home Depot, Inc. | 2,566,080 | |||
48,300 | * | Kohl’s Corporation | 2,544,444 | ||
177,100 | Lowe’s Companies, Inc. | 3,947,559 | |||
29,100 | McDonald’s Corporation | 2,168,241 | |||
52,800 | Omnicom Group, Inc. | 2,084,544 | |||
114,700 | Staples, Inc. | 2,399,524 | |||
57,500 | Target Corporation | 3,072,800 | |||
88,133 | Time Warner, Inc. | 2,701,276 | |||
64,400 | Viacom, Inc. – Class “B” | 2,330,636 | |||
109,100 | Walt Disney Company | 3,612,301 | |||
34,612,568 | |||||
Consumer Staples—15.7% | |||||
80,600 | Avon Products, Inc. | 2,588,066 | |||
41,515 | Clorox Company | 2,771,542 | |||
98,100 | Coca-Cola Company | 5,740,812 | |||
46,900 | Costco Wholesale Corporation | 3,024,581 | |||
128,000 | CVS Caremark Corporation | 4,028,160 | |||
38,300 | Kellogg Company | 1,934,533 | |||
73,900 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4,807,195 | |||
128,024 | Kraft Foods, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,950,821 | |||
97,200 | Kroger Company | 2,105,352 | |||
116,000 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 7,707,040 | |||
88,500 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 4,957,770 | |||
91,960 | Procter & Gamble Company | 5,514,841 | |||
115,000 | Walgreen Company | 3,852,500 | |||
127,230 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 6,809,350 | |||
59,792,563 | |||||
Energy—10.5% | |||||
102,000 | Chevron Corporation | 8,267,100 | |||
89,870 | ConocoPhillips | 5,161,234 | |||
48,500 | Devon Energy Corporation | 3,139,890 | |||
167,100 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 10,325,109 | |||
59,890 | Halliburton Company | 1,980,562 | |||
35,200 | Hess Corporation | 2,081,024 |
68 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Energy (continued) | |||||
82,900 | Marathon Oil Corporation | $ 2,743,990 | |||
65,900 | Noble Corporation | 2,226,761 | |||
65,100 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 4,010,811 | |||
39,936,481 | |||||
Financials—13.3% | |||||
52,400 | ACE, Ltd. | 3,052,300 | |||
60,700 | Allstate Corporation | 1,915,085 | |||
88,800 | American Express Company | 3,732,264 | |||
70,500 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 3,336,765 | |||
170,236 | Bank of America Corporation | 2,231,794 | |||
147,587 | Bank of New York Mellon Corporation | 3,856,448 | |||
50,600 | Capital One Financial Corporation | 2,001,230 | |||
50,700 | Chubb Corporation | 2,889,393 | |||
170,800 | Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. | 2,094,008 | |||
173,668 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 6,611,541 | |||
89,500 | Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. | 2,158,740 | |||
56,000 | MetLife, Inc. | 2,153,200 | |||
84,600 | Morgan Stanley | 2,087,928 | |||
46,400 | Northern Trust Corporation | 2,238,336 | |||
75,100 | State Street Corporation | 2,828,266 | |||
57,700 | Travelers Companies, Inc. | 3,006,170 | |||
86,500 | U.S. Bancorp | 1,870,130 | |||
106,500 | Wells Fargo & Company | 2,676,345 | |||
50,739,943 | |||||
Health Care—15.9% | |||||
122,600 | Abbott Laboratories | 6,404,624 | |||
69,900 | * | Amgen, Inc. | 3,852,189 | ||
69,800 | Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | 1,892,278 | |||
30,600 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | 2,491,758 | |||
49,100 | Covidien, PLC | 1,973,329 | |||
54,400 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 1,937,184 | ||
169,200 | Johnson & Johnson | 10,483,632 | |||
41,400 | * | Life Technologies Corp. | 1,932,966 | ||
26,800 | McKesson Corporation | 1,655,704 | |||
104,300 | Medtronic, Inc. | 3,502,394 | |||
97,000 | Merck & Company. Inc. | 3,570,570 | |||
77,300 | Novartis AG (ADR) | 4,457,891 | |||
354,078 | Pfizer, Inc. | 6,079,519 | |||
39,100 | Quest Diagnostics, Inc. | 1,973,377 |
69 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
BLUE CHIP FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Health Care (continued) | |||||
61,100 | * | St. Jude Medical, Inc. | $ 2,403,674 | ||
39,500 | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. (ADR) | 2,083,625 | |||
41,450 | * | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 1,984,626 | ||
37,600 | * | Zimmer Holdings, Inc. | 1,967,608 | ||
60,646,948 | |||||
Industrials—11.1% | |||||
43,400 | 3M Company | 3,763,214 | |||
37,100 | Emerson Electric Company | 1,953,686 | |||
385,300 | General Electric Company | 6,261,125 | |||
65,900 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 2,895,646 | |||
43,500 | Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | 2,045,370 | |||
79,800 | Ingersoll-Rand, PLC | 2,849,658 | |||
68,300 | ITT Corporation | 3,198,489 | |||
44,900 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 3,200,472 | |||
37,600 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | 2,279,688 | |||
46,500 | Raytheon Company | 2,125,515 | |||
64,300 | Republic Services, Inc. | 1,960,507 | |||
67,475 | Tyco International, Ltd. | 2,478,357 | |||
36,600 | United Parcel Service, Inc. – Class “B” | 2,440,854 | |||
65,500 | United Technologies Corporation | 4,665,565 | |||
42,118,146 | |||||
Information Technology—17.4% | |||||
186,900 | Activision Blizzard, Inc. | 2,022,258 | |||
84,300 | * | Adobe Systems, Inc. | 2,204,445 | ||
16,900 | * | Apple, Inc. | 4,795,375 | ||
49,000 | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2,059,470 | |||
97,500 | CA, Inc. | 2,059,200 | |||
275,200 | * | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 6,026,880 | ||
136,425 | * | EMC Corporation | 2,770,792 | ||
135,000 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 5,679,450 | |||
281,700 | Intel Corporation | 5,417,091 | |||
42,900 | International Business Machines Corporation | 5,754,606 | |||
506,345 | Microsoft Corporation | 12,400,389 | |||
174,000 | Oracle Corporation | 4,671,900 | |||
79,270 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 3,576,662 |
70 |
Shares or | ||||||
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Information Technology (continued) | ||||||
131,900 | * | Symantec Corporation | $ 2,000,923 | |||
99,600 | Texas Instruments, Inc. | 2,703,144 | ||||
131,900 | Western Union Company | 2,330,673 | ||||
66,473,258 | ||||||
Materials—1.4% | ||||||
91,200 | Dow Chemical Company | 2,504,352 | ||||
66,300 | DuPont (E.I.) de Nemours & Company | 2,958,306 | ||||
5,462,658 | ||||||
Telecommunication Services—3.4% | ||||||
201,300 | AT&T, Inc. | 5,757,180 | ||||
215,200 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 7,013,368 | ||||
12,770,548 | ||||||
Utilities—1.4% | ||||||
62,500 | American Electric Power, Inc. | 2,264,375 | ||||
58,300 | NextEra Energy, Inc. | 3,170,937 | ||||
5,435,312 | ||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $307,043,743) | 377,988,425 | |||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS—.9% | ||||||
Money Market Fund | ||||||
$ 3,295 | M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% | ||||
(cost $3,295,000)** | 3,295,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $310,338,743) | 100.1 | % | 381,283,425 | |||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.1 | ) | (203,814) | |||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $381,079,611 |
71 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
BLUE CHIP FUND
September 30, 2010
* Non-income producing
** Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
Summary of Abbreviations:
ADR American Depositary Receipts
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | ||||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | |||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 377,988,425 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 377,988,425 | ||||
Money Market Fund | 3,295,000 | — | — | 3,295,000 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 381,283,425 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 381,283,425 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for the portfolio.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
72 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Growth & Income Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 9.0% for Class A shares and 8.2% for Class B shares, including dividends of 7.1 cents per share on Class A shares and .3 cents per share on B shares.
During the review period, the equity markets settled into a more stable pattern of positive results, boosted by a slowly improving economy. The Fund’s returns reflected that performance. However, the markets remained highly susceptible to short-term headlines, creating periods of high volatility. The environment remained more macro driven, as the Federal Reserve, the Obama administration and Congress continued to be aggressively involved in economic affairs, proposing new regulations and increasing government oversight of businesses. Many of these actions were perceived as being negative for business, impacting whole sectors or industries. Industries such as health care, energy, financials and education were greatly impacted by governmental initiatives, and saw their share prices affected during the period.
The Fund’s weightings in consumer staples and industrials increased throughout the year, as these sectors demonstrated solid growth in earnings and benefited from cost control programs. Overall stock selection and weightings benefited the Fund’s relative performance most notably within these sectors. Additionally, better stock selection also aided investments within utilities and materials.
Notable individual performers within consumer staples included shares of direct seller of beauty products and nutriceuticals Nu Skin Enterprises, spice and flavorings maker McCormick, and tobacco giant Altria Group. The Fund also benefited from the take-over of small-cap personal products maker Chattem by French pharmaceutical giant Sanofi-Aventis. Within industrials, shares of Honeywell, United Technologies, 3M, and Caterpillar were the top larger-cap companies. The overall top performers were two investments in ocean freight container leasing companies, TAL International and Tex-tainer Group Holdings, which benefited from a strong resurgence of global commerce, positively impacting their pricing and utilization.
The Fund remained underweight in the volatile energy sector, as natural gas remained plentiful and its pricing reflected that fact by dropping 30% since the beginning of 2010. Oil had its own volatile year, but remained only modestly above last year’s price levels. However, the energy sector performed well during the period and our relative underweight and poor stock selection hurt results. The Fund’s investments within technology also impacted results. Poor stock selection in the Fund’s larger-cap, longer-term holdings, such as Cisco Systems, Nokia, Hewlett Packard and Microsoft,
73 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
hurt performance. In addition, a slowdown in government procurement impacted the results of the Fund’s investments in defense-related IT services firms.
The strength of “growth” investments over “value” also influenced the Fund’s return during the period. With the Fund’s strategy, valuation metrics tend to be important in our process, as we have followed a “growth at a reasonable price” philosophy. The stocks owned by the Fund therefore have tended to have a more “value” bias recently, and we were negatively impacted by the market’s shift toward growth. Additionally, shares of dividend-paying issues also lagged. This detracted from the Fund’s performance, since it has a policy of investing in dividend-paying stocks, and therefore had more than 75% of its portfolio invested in dividend-paying companies.
The Fund maintained a diverse market capitalization allocation during the period, ending with 58% large cap, 14% mid cap and 28% small cap, according to Lipper’s market capitalization ranges. This is consistent with the Fund’s long-term strategy. While the large-cap segment underperformed the benchmark, the mid- and small-cap components delivered better relative results.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
74 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $969.05 | $6.86 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,018.10 | $7.03 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $964.51 | $10.29 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,014.59 | $10.56 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.39% for Class A shares and 2.09% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total market value of investments.
75 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Growth & Income Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Growth & Income Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/00 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of such stocks, which represent all major industries. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75% (prior to 6/17/02 the maximum sales charge was 6.25%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the origina l cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
76 |
Portfolio of Investments
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
COMMON STOCKS—96.0% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary—15.3% | |||||
195,000 | American Greetings Corporation – Class “A” | $ 3,625,050 | |||
135,000 | * | Big Lots, Inc. | 4,488,750 | ||
120,000 | * | BorgWarner, Inc. | 6,314,400 | ||
168,300 | Brown Shoe Company, Inc. | 1,930,401 | |||
275,000 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 4,361,500 | |||
80,000 | * | CEC Entertainment, Inc. | 2,746,400 | ||
70,000 | Coach, Inc. | 3,007,200 | |||
160,000 | * | GameStop Corporation – Class “A” | 3,153,600 | ||
75,000 | Guess?, Inc. | 3,047,250 | |||
390,000 | H&R Block, Inc. | 5,050,500 | |||
160,000 | Home Depot, Inc. | 5,068,800 | |||
125,000 | Limited Brands, Inc. | 3,347,500 | |||
259,000 | * | Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 3,732,190 | ||
85,000 | McDonald’s Corporation | 6,333,350 | |||
445,000 | * | Morgans Hotel Group Company | 3,257,400 | ||
400,000 | Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | 7,124,000 | |||
25,000 | NIKE, Inc. – Class “B” | 2,003,500 | |||
450,000 | * | Ruby Tuesday, Inc. | 5,341,500 | ||
128,000 | * | Steiner Leisure, Ltd. | 4,876,800 | ||
631,800 | Stewart Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,405,402 | |||
140,000 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 5,818,400 | ||
140,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 6,406,400 | |||
200,000 | Wyndham Worldwide Corporation | 5,494,000 | |||
99,934,293 | |||||
Consumer Staples—12.4% | |||||
420,000 | Altria Group, Inc. | 10,088,400 | |||
100,000 | Avon Products, Inc. | 3,211,000 | |||
135,000 | Coca-Cola Company | 7,900,200 | |||
200,000 | CVS Caremark Corporation | 6,294,000 | |||
60,000 | * | Dole Food Company, Inc. | 549,000 | ||
40,000 | Kellogg Company | 2,020,400 | |||
160,000 | Lance, Inc. | 3,408,000 | |||
95,000 | McCormick & Company, Inc. | 3,993,800 | |||
250,000 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 7,200,000 | |||
76,000 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 5,049,440 | |||
225,000 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 12,604,500 | |||
90,562 | Procter & Gamble Company | 5,431,003 |
77 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Consumer Staples (continued) | |||||
42,913 | Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | $ 1,067,675 | |||
140,000 | Walgreen Company | 4,690,000 | |||
146,250 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 7,827,300 | |||
81,334,718 | |||||
Energy—6.7% | |||||
58,046 | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation | 3,311,524 | |||
87,750 | ConocoPhillips | 5,039,483 | |||
75,000 | Ensco, PLC (ADR) | 3,354,750 | |||
135,490 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 8,371,927 | |||
6,920 | Hugoton Royalty Trust | 138,331 | |||
76,519 | Marathon Oil Corporation | 2,532,779 | |||
182,700 | Noble Corporation | 6,173,433 | |||
78,000 | Sasol, Ltd. (ADR) | 3,493,620 | |||
237,900 | Suncor Energy, Inc. | 7,743,645 | |||
53,208 | * | Transocean, Ltd. | 3,420,742 | ||
43,580,234 | |||||
Financials—12.1% | |||||
50,700 | American Express Company | 2,130,921 | |||
135,000 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 6,389,550 | |||
210,600 | Brookline Bancorp, Inc. | 2,101,788 | |||
63,745 | Capital One Financial Corporation | 2,521,115 | |||
97,500 | Discover Financial Services | 1,626,300 | |||
400,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 5,740,000 | |||
175,500 | First Mercury Financial Corporation | 1,769,040 | |||
275,000 | FirstMerit Corporation | 5,038,000 | |||
390,000 | Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. | 4,781,400 | |||
40,000 | IBERIABANK Corporation | 1,999,200 | |||
130,000 | Invesco, Ltd. | 2,759,900 | |||
173,062 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 6,588,470 | |||
165,750 | Morgan Stanley | 4,090,710 | |||
450,000 | New York Community Bancorp, Inc. | 7,312,500 | |||
265,000 | NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. | 3,344,300 | |||
200,000 | SPDR KBW Regional Banking (ETF) | 4,582,000 | |||
35,000 | SPDR S&P 500 Trust (ETF) | 3,994,200 | |||
357,666 | * | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 3,244,031 |
78 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Financials (continued) | |||||
100,000 | U.S. Bancorp | $ 2,162,000 | |||
224,100 | Urstadt Biddle Properties – Class “A” (REIT) | 4,051,728 | |||
110,450 | Wells Fargo & Company | 2,775,609 | |||
79,002,762 | |||||
Health Care—9.5% | |||||
155,000 | Abbott Laboratories | 8,097,200 | |||
45,532 | * | Amgen, Inc. | 2,509,269 | ||
55,000 | Baxter International, Inc. | 2,624,050 | |||
85,000 | * | Genzyme Corporation | 6,017,150 | ||
120,000 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 4,273,200 | ||
170,625 | Johnson & Johnson | 10,571,925 | |||
23,500 | * | Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings | 1,843,105 | ||
80,000 | Medtronic, Inc. | 2,686,400 | |||
97,500 | Merck & Company. Inc. | 3,588,975 | |||
414,375 | Pfizer, Inc. | 7,114,819 | |||
35,000 | * | PSS World Medical, Inc. | 748,300 | ||
121,875 | Sanofi-Aventis (ADR) | 4,052,344 | |||
65,000 | * | St. Jude Medical, Inc. | 2,557,100 | ||
105,000 | * | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 5,027,400 | ||
61,711,237 | |||||
Industrials—16.2% | |||||
90,000 | 3M Company | 7,803,900 | |||
82,485 | Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. | 2,873,777 | |||
129,382 | * | Altra Holdings, Inc. | 1,905,797 | ||
175,000 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 7,264,250 | ||
82,400 | Baldor Electric Company | 3,328,960 | |||
70,000 | Caterpillar, Inc. | 5,507,600 | |||
175,500 | * | Chicago Bridge & Iron Company NV – NY Shares | 4,290,975 | ||
78,600 | * | Esterline Technologies Corporation | 4,498,278 | ||
145,000 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 1,977,800 | ||
124,075 | General Electric Company | 2,016,219 | |||
136,500 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 5,997,810 | |||
134,275 | IDEX Corporation | 4,768,105 | |||
55,000 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 3,920,400 | |||
176,150 | * | Mobile Mini, Inc. | 2,702,141 | ||
60,000 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | 3,637,800 | |||
224,538 | * | PGT, Inc. | 511,947 | ||
96,743 | * | Pinnacle Airlines Corporation | 525,315 | ||
75,000 | Raytheon Company | 3,428,250 |
79 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Industrials (continued) | |||||
98,900 | Republic Services, Inc. | $ 3,015,461 | |||
125,000 | Snap-on, Inc. | 5,813,750 | |||
401,500 | TAL International Group, Inc. | 9,724,330 | |||
192,300 | Textainer Group Holdings, Ltd. | 5,142,102 | |||
210,000 | Tyco International, Ltd. | 7,713,300 | |||
100,000 | United Technologies Corporation | 7,123,000 | |||
105,491,267 | |||||
Information Technology—15.9% | |||||
160,000 | * | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 3,601,600 | ||
450,000 | * | Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. | 2,628,000 | ||
68,000 | * | CACI International, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,077,680 | ||
300,000 | * | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 6,570,000 | ||
361,725 | * | EMC Corporation | 7,346,635 | ||
150,000 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 6,310,500 | |||
180,375 | Intel Corporation | 3,468,611 | |||
108,525 | International Business Machines Corporation | 14,557,544 | |||
155,400 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 1,816,626 | |||
450,000 | Microsoft Corporation | 11,020,500 | |||
365,000 | National Semiconductor Corporation | 4,661,050 | |||
185,000 | * | NCI, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,500,200 | ||
248,625 | * | Parametric Technology Corporation | 4,858,133 | ||
209,800 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 9,466,176 | |||
170,000 | * | SRA International, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,352,400 | ||
333,025 | * | Symantec Corporation | 5,051,988 | ||
200,000 | Tyco Electronics, Ltd. | 5,844,000 | |||
360,000 | Western Union Company | 6,361,200 | |||
103,492,843 | |||||
Materials—5.1% | |||||
175,000 | Bemis Company, Inc. | 5,556,250 | |||
125,000 | Celanese Corporation – Series “A” | 4,012,500 | |||
80,000 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 6,831,200 | |||
177,500 | Olin Corporation | 3,578,400 | |||
40,000 | Praxair, Inc. | 3,610,400 | |||
249,125 | RPM International, Inc. | 4,962,570 | |||
247,350 | Temple-Inland, Inc. | 4,615,550 | |||
�� | 33,166,870 |
80 |
Shares or | ||||||
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Telecommunication Services—2.4% | ||||||
234,000 | AT&T, Inc. | $ 6,692,400 | ||||
280,000 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 9,125,200 | ||||
15,817,600 | ||||||
Utilities—.4% | ||||||
100,000 | Atmos Energy Corporation | 2,925,000 | ||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $561,158,033) | 626,456,824 | |||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS—4.2% | ||||||
Money Market Fund | ||||||
$27,560 | M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% | ||||
(cost 27,560,000)** | 27,560,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $588,718,033) | 100.2 | % | 654,016,824 | |||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.2 | ) | (1,487,211) | |||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $652,529,613 |
* Non-income producing
** Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
Summary of Abbreviations:
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
81 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GROWTH & INCOME FUND
September 30, 2010
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | ||||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | |||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | |||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 626,456,824 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 626,456,824 | ||||
Money Market Fund | 27,560,000 | — | — | 27,560,000 | ||||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 654,016,824 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 654,016,824 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for the portfolio.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
82 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
GLOBAL FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Global Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 7.3% for Class A shares and 6.6% for Class B shares, including dividends of 1.0 cent per share on Class A shares.
After a volatile twelve months, global equities ultimately finished the reporting period in positive territory. Global equities started off strong as investor confidence grew amid better-than-expected corporate earnings, an accommodative monetary policy, and improving economic conditions. Equity investors shrugged off concerns about a double-dip recession and the slowing pace of economic growth. Strong corporate earnings, positive economic data from Emerging Markets, and robust merger and acquisition activity helped fuel equity performance.
The Fund produced a reasonable return during the year, with strong stock selection in the industrials, financials and materials sectors offsetting weaker selection in energy and information technology. On a regional basis, Europe ex the U.K. and Japan were areas of strength, while holdings in Emerging Markets and the U.S. lagged.
Top contributors to performance during the period included Potash (materials), Rio Tinto (materials), and Compagnie Financiere Richemont (consumer discretionary). Shares of Potash, the largest global producer of potash fertilizer, benefited after the company received a takeout offer from Australian mining company BHP Billiton. Shares of Rio Tinto rose after the diversified international mining company reported earnings that outpaced consensus expectations driven largely by iron ore prices and higher-than-anticipated cost cutting at the firm’s aluminum division. Swiss stocks advanced after German business confidence unexpectedly rose and a report showed demand for U.S. capital equipment had rebounded, boosting optimism that the economy would continue to grow. Richemont, the world’s largest jewelry maker, posted the biggest advance on the Swiss Market Index, rising to a record high in September.
The largest detractors from performance during the period included CRH (materials), UBS (financials), and ING (financials). Shares of CRH, a manufacturer and distributor of construction and building materials primarily in Europe and the Americas, declined because of low visibility and weak demand. We continued to hold a position in CRH as of the end of the reporting period based upon the company’s plans to cut costs and make accretive acquisitions, and optimism about its cement and aggregates business in Finland, Poland and Switzerland. Shares of UBS, a Switzerland-based investment bank and money manager, sold off along with other investment banks amid expectations of a near-term decline in trading profits. We continued to hold the stock as the reporting period ended due to its attractive valuation and good upside potential
83 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
over the longer term via its restructuring efforts. Shares of ING, a global financial services firm engaged in banking, investments, life insurance and retirement services, fell as the company announced a proposed spin-off of its insurance unit amid a massive restructuring plan. The Fund eliminated the position.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
Sincerely,
84 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
GLOBAL FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $998.38 | $8.67 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,016.40 | $8.74 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $994.44 | $12.15 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,012.89 | $12.26 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.73% for Class A shares and 2.43% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the period are net of expenses waived.
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total market value of investments.
85 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
GLOBAL FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Global Fund (Class A shares) and the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) All Country World Free Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Global Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/00 with a theoretical investment in the MSCI All Country World Free Index (the “Index”). The Index represents both the developed and the emerging markets. The Index includes 45 countries of which 21 are emerging markets. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75% (prior to 6/17/02, the maximum sales charge was 6.25%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 1.12%, 1.08% and .17%, respectively. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 2.53%, 1.25% and .28%, respectively.
Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
86 |
Portfolio of Investments
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
COMMON STOCKS—95.3% | |||||
United States—42.3% | |||||
13,500 | Abbott Laboratories | $ 705,240 | |||
16,900 | Aflac, Inc. | 873,899 | |||
27,370 | * Alliance Data Systems Corporation | 1,786,166 | |||
16,500 | American Electric Power Company, Inc. | 597,795 | |||
62,870 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 2,975,637 | |||
22,270 | * | Amgen, Inc. | 1,227,300 | ||
35,025 | Analog Devices, Inc. | 1,099,085 | |||
21,440 | Apache Corporation | 2,095,974 | |||
5,740 | * | Apple, Inc. | 1,628,725 | ||
131,890 | Assured Guaranty, Ltd. | 2,256,638 | |||
109,170 | AT&T, Inc. | 3,122,262 | |||
8,600 | * | Atwood Oceanics, Inc. | 261,870 | ||
48,165 | Bank of America Corporation | 631,443 | |||
6,025 | Boeing Company | 400,904 | |||
39,900 | * | Cameron International Corporation | 1,714,104 | ||
110,985 | CBS Corporation – Class “B” | 1,760,222 | |||
18,095 | * | Children’s Place Retail Stores, Inc. | 882,493 | ||
137,910 | * | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 3,020,229 | ||
6,800 | Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc. | 434,656 | |||
39,880 | Consol Energy, Inc. | 1,473,965 | |||
78,120 | Corning, Inc. | 1,428,034 | |||
16,100 | Covidien, PLC | 647,059 | |||
16,400 | CVS Caremark Corporation | 516,108 | |||
14,900 | Deere & Company | 1,039,722 | |||
46,825 | * | eBay, Inc. | 1,142,530 | ||
163,480 | * | EMC Corporation | 3,320,279 | ||
8,490 | Emerson Electric Company | 447,083 | |||
6,850 | EOG Resources, Inc. | 636,845 | |||
65,370 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 4,039,212 | |||
24,960 | Flowserve Corporation | 2,731,123 | |||
4,000 | Fluor Corporation | 198,120 | |||
96,170 | * | Ford Motor Company | 1,177,121 | ||
14,210 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 1,213,392 | |||
218,400 | General Electric Company | 3,549,000 | |||
9,760 | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1,411,101 | |||
5,055 | * | Google, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,657,868 | ||
13,300 | H.J. Heinz Company | 630,021 | |||
48,435 | Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. | 1,111,583 | |||
45,815 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 1,927,437 | |||
54,890 | Honeywell International, Inc. | 2,411,867 |
87 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
United States (continued) | |||||
17,750 | Ingersoll-Rand, PLC | $ 633,853 | |||
13,925 | International Business Machines Corporation | 1,867,900 | |||
22,235 | * | ITT Educational Services, Inc. | 1,562,453 | ||
32,520 | JPMorgan Chase & Company | 1,238,036 | |||
18,305 | * | Las Vegas Sands Corporation | 637,929 | ||
65,890 | Lowe’s Companies, Inc. | 1,468,688 | |||
30,500 | McDonald’s Corporation | 2,272,555 | |||
5,800 | Medtronic, Inc. | 194,764 | |||
44,840 | Merck & Company. Inc. | 1,650,560 | |||
6,900 | MetLife, Inc. | 265,305 | |||
107,900 | Microsoft Corporation | 2,642,471 | |||
7,175 | Mosaic Company | 421,603 | |||
19,275 | NextEra Energy, Inc. | 1,048,367 | |||
25,000 | Noble Corporation | 844,750 | |||
58,860 | Nordstrom, Inc. | 2,189,592 | |||
112,965 | Oracle Corporation | 3,033,110 | |||
52,025 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 3,456,541 | |||
118,454 | Pfizer, Inc. | 2,033,855 | |||
10,000 | PG&E Corporation | 454,200 | |||
36,485 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 2,043,890 | |||
20,075 | Precision Castparts Corporation | 2,556,551 | |||
56,090 | Procter & Gamble Company | 3,363,717 | |||
46,100 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 2,080,032 | |||
9,770 | Schlumberger, Ltd. | 601,930 | |||
33,970 | * | St. Jude Medical, Inc. | 1,336,380 | ||
9,500 | * | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 454,860 | ||
34,725 | TJX Companies, Inc. | 1,549,777 | |||
40,215 | * | Ultra Petroleum Corporation | 1,688,226 | ||
37,635 | United Parcel Service, Inc. – Class “B” | 2,509,878 | |||
48,155 | UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 1,690,722 | |||
50,635 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 2,709,985 | |||
117,875 | Wells Fargo & Company | 2,962,199 | |||
22,900 | * | WESCO International, Inc. | 899,741 | ||
3,700 | * | Whiting Petroleum Corporation | 353,387 | ||
21,485 | Xilinx, Inc. | 571,716 | |||
116,473,635 | |||||
United Kingdom—11.9% | |||||
16,427 | AstraZeneca, PLC | 837,011 | |||
19,200 | AstraZeneca, PLC (ADR) | 973,440 | |||
431,902 | Barclays, PLC | 2,039,046 |
88 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||
United Kingdom (continued) | |||||
179,152 | BG Group, PLC | $ 3,157,603 | |||
151,093 | BP, PLC | 1,018,556 | |||
403,559 | * | British Airways, PLC | 1,544,030 | ||
162,599 | Capita Group, PLC | 2,013,911 | |||
259,107 | HSBC Holdings, PLC | 2,633,533 | |||
104,873 | Imperial Tobacco Group, PLC | 3,134,952 | |||
359,316 | National Grid, PLC | 3,057,527 | |||
82,961 | Pearson, PLC | 1,288,340 | |||
181,382 | Reed Elsevier, PLC | 1,537,717 | |||
79,196 | Rio Tinto, PLC | 4,643,686 | |||
20,985 | Rio Tinto, PLC (ADR) | 1,232,449 | |||
63,081 | Standard Chartered, PLC | 1,815,095 | |||
168,328 | WPP, PLC | 1,868,690 | |||
32,795,586 | |||||
Switzerland—6.9% | |||||
28,390 | Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA | 1,374,821 | |||
43,589 | Julius Baer Group, Ltd. | 1,595,966 | |||
15,167 | Kuehne & Nagel International AG | 1,831,932 | |||
50,935 | Nestle SA – Registered | 2,729,359 | |||
24,629 | Roche Holding AG – Genusscheine | 3,383,194 | |||
1,077 | SGS SA – Registered | 1,750,628 | |||
133,120 | * | UBS AG – Registered | 2,267,034 | ||
241,600 | * | UBS AG – Registered | 4,124,969 | ||
19,057,903 | |||||
Japan—5.1% | |||||
81,800 | Bridgestone Corporation | 1,489,320 | |||
21,300 | Eisai Company, Ltd. | 744,251 | |||
7,100 | FANUC, Ltd. | 903,435 | |||
204,000 | Hitachi, Ltd. | 891,310 | |||
138 | INPEX Corporation | 649,198 | |||
178 | KDDI Corporation | 851,221 | |||
279,400 | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 1,301,013 | |||
12,200 | NIDEC Corporation | 1,083,601 | |||
8,500 | OSAKA Titanium Technologies Company, Ltd. | 397,833 | |||
28,700 | Shin-Etsu Chemical Company, Ltd. | 1,396,523 | |||
28,800 | Softbank Corporation | 941,499 | |||
228 | Sony Financial Holdings, Inc. | 742,351 |
89 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Japan (continued) | |||||
334,000 | Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. | $ 843,596 | |||
15,100 | TOHO Titanium Company, Ltd. | 416,633 | |||
49,300 | Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. | 1,328,987 | |||
13,980,771 | |||||
France—4.2% | |||||
264,574 | * | Alcatel-Lucent | 892,159 | ||
18,833 | BNP Paribas | 1,341,339 | |||
60,051 | Danone SA | 3,596,961 | |||
29,093 | Safran SA | 818,984 | |||
26,338 | Schneider Electric SA | 3,344,342 | |||
6,822 | * | Unibail-Rodamco | 1,514,831 | ||
11,508,616 | |||||
Brazil—3.4% | |||||
105,800 | BM&F BOVESPA SA | 884,269 | |||
45,000 | Cia de Concessoes Rodoviarias | 1,151,428 | |||
14,700 | Companhia de Bebidas das Americas (ADR) | 1,819,566 | |||
40,900 | * | Hypermarcas SA | 626,705 | ||
15,700 | Itau Unibanco Holdings SA | 379,626 | |||
165,382 | Itau Unibanco Holdings SA (ADR) | 3,998,937 | |||
53,300 | * | Julio Simoes Logistica SA | 262,693 | ||
12,400 | PDG Realty SA | 147,260 | |||
9,270,484 | |||||
Germany—2.9% | |||||
11,451 | Beiersdorf AG | 699,732 | |||
17,757 | * | Continental AG | 1,374,520 | ||
46,812 | * | Daimler AG | 2,967,570 | ||
21,818 | HeidelbergCement AG | 1,055,916 | |||
18,361 | Siemens AG | 1,944,663 | |||
8,042,401 | |||||
China—2.4% | |||||
3,048,000 | * | Agricultural Bank of China, Ltd. | 1,578,339 | ||
6,800 | ChinaCache Holdings, Ltd. (ADR) | 94,520 | |||
555,995 | China Merchants Bank Company, Ltd. | 1,432,386 | |||
8,800 | * | Ctrip.com International, Ltd. (ADR) | 420,200 |
90 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||
China (continued) | |||||
168,000 | Dongfeng Motor Group Company, Ltd. | $ 343,652 | |||
745,000 | Geely Automobile Holdings, Ltd. | 369,467 | |||
1,460,000 | Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Ltd. | 1,087,026 | |||
6,300 | * | NetEase.com, Inc. (ADR) | 248,472 | ||
6,000 | * | Perfect World Company, Ltd. (ADR) | 153,960 | ||
132,000 | Skyworth Digital Holdings, Ltd. | 91,988 | |||
35,600 | Tencent Holdings, Ltd. | 777,741 | |||
6,597,751 | |||||
Israel—2.0% | |||||
102,225 | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. (ADR) | 5,392,369 | |||
Hong Kong—1.8% | |||||
129,527 | Esprit Holdings, Ltd. | 702,428 | |||
292,000 | Hang Lung Properties, Ltd. | 1,425,546 | |||
256,888 | Shangri-La Asia, Ltd. | 584,378 | |||
127,000 | Sun Hung Kai Properties, Ltd. | 2,192,137 | |||
4,904,489 | |||||
Italy—1.3% | |||||
242,460 | Intesa Sanpaolo SpA | 788,626 | |||
534,276 | Snam Rete Gas SpA | 2,709,710 | |||
3,498,336 | |||||
Spain—1.2% | |||||
132,905 | Repsol YPF SA | 3,428,361 | |||
Taiwan—1.2% | |||||
240,612 | Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. – Registered (GDR) | 1,816,621 | |||
778 | HTC Corporation (GDR) | 70,624 | |||
149,700 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. (ADR) | 1,517,958 | |||
3,405,203 | |||||
Sweden—1.2% | |||||
27,270 | Assa Abloy AB – Class “B” | 688,785 | |||
95,641 | Atlas Copco AB – Class “A” | 1,848,719 | |||
23,096 | Hennes & Mauritz AB – Class “B” | 837,633 | |||
3,375,137 |
91 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Ireland—.9% | |||||
105,699 | CRH, PLC | $ 1,734,497 | |||
26,400 | Ryanair Holdings, PLC (ADR) | 813,384 | |||
2,547,881 | |||||
Finland—.9% | |||||
608 | Cargotec Oyj – B Shares | 26,312 | |||
6,484 | * | Elisa Oyj | 149,156 | ||
24,817 | Kone Oyj-B | 1,284,064 | |||
4,059 | Konecranes Oyj | 152,000 | |||
18,385 | Outotec Oyj | 779,585 | |||
2,391,117 | |||||
Canada—.9% | |||||
9,800 | Agrium, Inc. | 734,902 | |||
8,000 | Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Inc. | 1,153,541 | |||
9,500 | * | Research in Motion, Ltd. | 462,555 | ||
2,350,998 | |||||
South Africa—.8% | |||||
81,219 | Impala Platinum Holdings, Ltd. | 2,096,185 | |||
Netherlands—.7% | |||||
129,900 | Koninklijke (Royal) KPN NV | 2,011,926 | |||
Mexico—.6% | |||||
31,000 | America Movil SA de CV (ADR) – Series “L” | 1,653,230 | |||
Chile—.6% | |||||
69,200 | Enersis SA (ADR) | 1,626,892 | |||
Norway—.5% | |||||
28,179 | Yara International ASA | 1,279,945 | |||
Colombia—.4% | |||||
18,700 | Bancolombia SA (ADR) | 1,227,281 | |||
Denmark—.4% | |||||
54,816 | DSV A/S | 1,120,682 | |||
Panama—.3% | |||||
18,100 | Copa Holdings SA – Class “A” | 975,771 |
92 |
Shares or | ||||||
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Russia—.2% | ||||||
9,418 | LUKOIL (ADR) | $ 534,001 | ||||
Turkey—.1% | ||||||
67,778 | Turkiye Garanti Bankasi AS | 393,609 | ||||
Malaysia—.1% | ||||||
487,600 | * | Airasia Berhad | 355,394 | |||
India—.1% | ||||||
77,448 | Infrastructure Development Finance Company, Ltd. | 349,449 | ||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $215,907,028) | 262,645,403 | |||||
SHORT-TERM CORPORATE NOTES—3.5% | ||||||
Money Market | ||||||
$ 9,560 | M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% | ||||
(cost $9,560,000)** | 9,560,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $225,467,028) | 98.8 | % | 272,205,403 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.2 | 3,420,099 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $275,625,502 |
* Non-income producing
** Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
Summary of Abbreviations:
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
GDR | Global Depositary Receipts |
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes (see Note 1A). The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
93 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
GLOBAL FUND
September 30, 2010
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | |||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | ||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | |||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | ||||||||
Common Stocks | |||||||||||
Financials | $ | 50,167,238 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 50,167,238 | |||
Industrials | 42,072,185 | — | — | 42,072,185 | |||||||
Information Technology | 35,131,502 | — | — | 35,131,502 | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 28,898,814 | — | — | 28,898,814 | |||||||
Consumer Staples | 25,327,537 | — | — | 25,327,537 | |||||||
Energy | 22,497,982 | — | — | 22,497,982 | |||||||
Health Care | 21,271,005 | — | — | 21,271,005 | |||||||
Materials | 19,055,357 | — | — | 19,055,357 | |||||||
Utilities | 9,494,491 | — | — | 9,494,491 | |||||||
Telecommunications Services | 8,729,292 | — | — | 8,729,292 | |||||||
Money Market Fund | 9,560,000 | — | — | 9,560,000 | |||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 272,205,403 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 272,205,403 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the country categorization for the portfolio.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
94 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
SELECT GROWTH FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Select Growth Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 8.6% for Class A shares and 7.9% for Class B shares.
During the first part of the review period, the markets continued to rally from the recent market bottom. The intensity of this rally, characterized by significant moves in low quality stocks, began to fade through the first half of the reporting period. Thus, stocks that were projected to have better-than-expected earnings — the types of stocks favored by the Fund — at long last started to lead the market during the fiscal second quarter. The market took a breather with a pullback during the fiscal third quarter, followed by a strong upward move to finish the fiscal year. As the economy has continued its recovery, albeit at a slower pace than desired, the Fund has continued to find companies with desirable earnings growth and earnings quality characteristics that allowed the Fund to generate better results as the year progressed.
The Fund underperformed the Russell 3000 Growth Index, largely due to the low quality rally during the fiscal first quarter noted above. From a sector view, the industrials and consumer discretionary sectors generated the lagging performance. Although these were the best performing sectors in the benchmark, the Fund’s portfolio holdings were unable to keep pace. In the industrials sector, the Fund’s positions in Graftech and Con-Way hurt overall returns. For Graftech, a supplier of graphite electrodes consumed in steel manufacturing, uncertainty about overall steel demand put pressure on pricing for its product. For trucking company Con-Way, the usual competitor company closures and consolidation in the trucking industry normally following a recession did not materialize, which had the effect of lengthening the period of margin pressure for all the companies in the industry.
On the positive side, the Fund’s holdings in the health care and consumer staples sectors performed better than the benchmark. The health care sector, while a lagging sector in the benchmark, posted an overall return of more than 33% in the Fund. The performance was largely driven by positions in Valeant Pharmaceuticals and Express Scripts. Valeant has continued to deliver stepwise increases in revenues and earnings as the company has grown by both product sales and acquisition of new products in existing markets and new geographies. Express Scripts, a large pharmacy benefit manager, grew dramatically this year with the purchase of NextRx, the pharmacy benefit subsidiary of health insurer Wellpoint. In consumer staples, outperformance was due to the position the Fund held in Whole Foods Market. The company, a grocer catering to consumers’ increasing demand for organic and higher quality foods, has delivered a solid series of better-than-expected r esults.
95 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
The Fund maintained a diverse market capitalization allocation during the year, ending with 50% large cap, 41% mid cap and 9% small cap, according to Lipper’s market capitalization ranges. Thus, the Fund had more exposure to mid- and small-cap stocks than did the benchmark. This was modestly beneficial to performance, as the small- and mid-sized companies generated better returns over the period.
While our focus on high quality companies with strong earnings expectations has only just begun to be rewarded in the current market cycle, we remain confident in our approach over the long term.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
Sincerely,
96 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,000.00 | $7.77 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,017.30 | $7.84 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $996.26 | $11.26 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,013.79 | $11.36 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.55% for Class A shares and 2.25% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
Portfolio Composition
BY SECTOR
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total market value of investments.
97 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Select Growth Fund (Class A shares) and the Russell 3000 Growth Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Select Growth Fund (Class A shares) beginning 10/25/00 (inception date) with a theoretical investment in the Russell 3000 Growth Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of those Russell 3000 Index companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values (the Russell 3000 Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization). It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund. Class B share s performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in the sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75% (prior to 6/17/02, the maximum sales charge was 6.25%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). During some of the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Total Return Since Inception would have been (3.75%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Total Return for Since Inception would have been (3.62%). Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Frank Russell and Company and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
98 |
Portfolio of Investments
SELECT GROWTH FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
COMMON STOCKS—99.0% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary—16.7% | |||||
54,500 | Autoliv, Inc. | $ 3,560,485 | |||
132,300 | * | Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. | 5,743,143 | ||
50,600 | * | Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | 8,703,200 | ||
113,800 | Limited Brands, Inc. | 3,047,564 | |||
122,800 | Mattel, Inc. | 2,880,888 | |||
7,285 | * | Priceline.com, Inc. | 2,537,657 | ||
103,600 | Ross Stores, Inc. | 5,658,632 | |||
32,131,569 | |||||
Consumer Staples—9.6% | |||||
72,900 | Brown-Forman Corporation – Class “B” | 4,493,556 | |||
95,100 | * | Hansen Natural Corporation | 4,433,562 | ||
156,200 | Tyson Foods, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,502,324 | |||
186,700 | * | Whole Foods Market, Inc. | 6,928,437 | ||
18,357,879 | |||||
Energy—5.8% | |||||
37,100 | Cimarex Energy Company | 2,455,278 | |||
45,800 | ExxonMobil Corporation | 2,829,982 | |||
69,900 | Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 2,828,154 | |||
54,200 | * | Newfield Exploration Company | 3,113,248 | ||
11,226,662 | |||||
Financials—7.3% | |||||
117,100 | American Express Company | 4,921,713 | |||
64,900 | Capital One Financial Corporation | 2,566,795 | |||
30,500 | Franklin Resources, Inc. | 3,260,450 | |||
63,000 | PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 3,270,330 | |||
14,019,288 | |||||
Health Care—13.6% | |||||
79,100 | * | Celgene Corporation | 4,556,951 | ||
169,900 | * | Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. | 5,647,476 | ||
149,300 | * | Express Scripts, Inc. | 7,270,910 | ||
67,900 | McKesson Corporation | 4,194,862 | |||
102,800 | * | Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 4,349,468 | ||
26,019,667 |
99 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SELECT GROWTH FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares or | ||||||
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Industrials—13.2% | ||||||
40,900 | Eaton Corporation | $3,373,841 | ||||
103,600 | Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | 4,871,272 | ||||
74,900 | Manpower, Inc. | 3,909,780 | ||||
70,800 | Parker Hannifin Corporation | 4,960,248 | ||||
85,852 | * | Thomas & Betts Corporation | 3,521,649 | |||
69,100 | United Parcel Service, Inc. – Class “B” | 4,608,279 | ||||
25,245,069 | ||||||
Information Technology—26.7% | ||||||
27,100 | * Apple, Inc. | 7,689,625 | ||||
114,600 | * Arrow Electronics, Inc. | 3,063,258 | ||||
156,200 | * BMC Software, Inc. | 6,322,976 | ||||
88,300 | Hewlett-Packard Company | 3,714,781 | ||||
42,500 | International Business Machines Corporation | 5,700,950 | ||||
438,000 | Jabil Circuit, Inc. | 6,311,580 | ||||
171,900 | Microsoft Corporation | 4,209,831 | ||||
101,100 | * NetApp, Inc. | 5,033,769 | ||||
210,600 | * TIBCO Software, Inc. | 3,736,044 | ||||
65,100 | * VMware, Inc. – Class “A” | 5,529,594 | ||||
51,312,408 | ||||||
Materials—6.1% | ||||||
79,700 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 6,805,583 | ||||
46,200 | Lubrizol Corporation | 4,895,814 | ||||
11,701,397 | ||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $165,560,027) | 190,013,939 | |||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS—1.1% | ||||||
Money Market Fund | ||||||
$ 2,135 | M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% | ||||
(cost $2,135,000)** | 2,135,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $167,695,027) | 100.1 | % | 192,148,939 | |||
Excess of Liabilities Over Other Assets | (.1 | ) | (169,388) | |||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $191,979,551 |
100 |
* Non-income producing
** Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | |||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | ||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | |||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | ||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 190,013,939 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 190,013,939 | |||
Money Market Fund | 2,135,000 | — | — | 2,135,000 | |||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 192,148,939 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 192,148,939 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for the portfolio.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
See notes to financial statements | 101 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Opportunity Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 13.0% for Class A shares and 12.3% for Class B shares.
During the review period, the equity markets settled into a more stable pattern of positive results, boosted by a slowly improving economy. The Fund’s returns reflected that performance. However, the markets remained highly susceptible to short-term headlines, creating periods of high volatility. The environment remained more macro driven, as the Federal Reserve, the Obama administration and Congress continued to be aggressively involved in economic affairs, proposing new regulations and increasing government oversight of businesses. Many of these actions have taken a negative tone, impacting whole sectors or industries. Industries such as health care, energy, financials and education were greatly impacted by governmental initiatives, and saw their share prices affected during the period.
The Fund’s strong performance was mainly attributable to its investments in industrials. Shares of defense contractor Argon ST were a key contributor due to its acquisition by The Boeing Company. Also, our investment in motor and compressor maker Baldor Electric benefited from strong earnings growth. Shares of aerospace electronics components maker Esterline Technologies jumped after the company reported a strong recovery in demand for its products.
On a relative basis, the Fund underperformed the S&P MidCap 400 Index primarily due to stock selection in financials. Lazard Limited, a global financial advisory services provider, fell on concerns that global mergers and acquisitions activity —especially in Europe — would fall. Another holding, IBERIABANK, which provides community banking primarily in Louisiana, also fell after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
The Fund’s stock selection in consumer staples aided relative performance. Nu Skin Enterprises, a global direct seller of personal care products and nutritional supplements, rose due to one of the most successful new product launches in its corporate history. Separately, stock selection in the consumer discretionary sector also contributed to performance. TRW Automotive, which makes automotive systems such as airbags and brakes, has been strong this year as global automobile production has recovered.
102 |
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
103 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $995.76 | $7.15 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,017.90 | $7.23 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $992.24 | $10.64 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,014.39 | $10.76 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.43% for Class A shares and 2.13% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total market value of investments.
104 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Opportunity Fund (Class A shares) and the Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Opportunity Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/00 with a theoretical investment in the Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 400 stocks designed to measure performance of the midrange sector of the U.S. stock market. As of 9/30/10 the median market capitalization is approximately $2.35 billion. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares performance may be greater than or les s than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75% (prior to 6/17/02, the maximum sales charge was 6.25%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for Five Years and Ten Years would have been (.77%) and .60%, respectively. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for Five Years and Ten Years would have been (.61%) and .75%, respectively. R esults represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Standard & Poor’s and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
105 |
Portfolio of Investments
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
COMMON STOCKS—98.8% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary—19.3% | |||||
190,000 | American Greetings Corporation – Class “A” | $ 3,532,100 | |||
148,400 | Barnes & Noble, Inc. | 2,405,564 | |||
115,000 | * | Big Lots, Inc. | 3,823,750 | ||
70,000 | * | BorgWarner, Inc. | 3,683,400 | ||
159,000 | Cinemark Holdings, Inc. | 2,559,900 | |||
70,000 | Coach, Inc. | 3,007,200 | |||
95,000 | * | Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,031,450 | ||
180,000 | * | GameStop Corporation – Class “A” | 3,547,800 | ||
55,000 | Guess?, Inc. | 2,234,650 | |||
250,000 | H&R Block, Inc. | 3,237,500 | |||
90,000 | Limited Brands, Inc. | 2,410,200 | |||
204,700 | * | Lincoln Educational Services Corporation | 2,949,727 | ||
295,000 | * | Morgans Hotel Group Company | 2,159,400 | ||
50,000 | Nordstrom, Inc. | 1,860,000 | |||
325,000 | * | Pier 1 Imports, Inc. | 2,661,750 | ||
35,000 | Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation – Class “A” | 3,145,100 | |||
260,000 | * | Ruby Tuesday, Inc. | 3,086,200 | ||
547,200 | Stewart Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,949,408 | |||
167,500 | * | Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. | 5,192,500 | ||
110,000 | Tiffany & Company | 5,168,900 | |||
195,000 | * | TRW Automotive Holdings Corporation | 8,104,200 | ||
130,000 | Tupperware Brands Corporation | 5,948,800 | |||
95,000 | * | Warnaco Group, Inc. | 4,857,350 | ||
81,556,849 | |||||
Consumer Staples—2.7% | |||||
50,000 | * | Dole Food Company, Inc. | 457,500 | ||
40,000 | Lance, Inc. | 852,000 | |||
70,000 | McCormick & Company, Inc. | 2,942,800 | |||
125,000 | Nu Skin Enterprises, Inc. – Class “A” | 3,600,000 | |||
150,000 | Sara Lee Corporation | 2,014,500 | |||
63,519 | Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 1,580,353 | |||
11,447,153 | |||||
Energy—8.0% | |||||
150,000 | * | Cal Dive International, Inc. | 820,500 | ||
37,500 | * | Dril-Quip, Inc. | 2,329,125 | ||
65,000 | Ensco, PLC (ADR) | 2,907,450 | |||
40,000 | EOG Resources, Inc. | 3,718,800 |
106 |
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Energy (continued) | |||||
90,000 | EQT Corporation | $ 3,245,400 | |||
43,000 | Hess Corporation | 2,542,160 | |||
110,000 | National-Oilwell Varco, Inc. | 4,891,700 | |||
110,000 | * | Plains Exploration & Production Company | 2,933,700 | ||
225,000 | Talisman Energy, Inc. | 3,935,250 | |||
52,500 | * | Transocean, Ltd. | 3,375,225 | ||
190,000 | * | Weatherford International, Ltd. | 3,249,000 | ||
33,948,310 | |||||
Financials—16.0% | |||||
120,000 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 5,679,600 | |||
75,000 | City National Corporation | 3,980,250 | |||
130,000 | Discover Financial Services | 2,168,400 | |||
150,000 | Douglas Emmett, Inc. (REIT) | 2,626,500 | |||
32,500 | Federal Realty Investment Trust (REIT) | 2,653,950 | |||
270,000 | Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 3,874,500 | |||
195,000 | FirstMerit Corporation | 3,572,400 | |||
320,000 | Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. | 3,923,200 | |||
66,000 | IBERIABANK Corporation | 3,298,680 | |||
115,000 | Invesco, Ltd. | 2,441,450 | |||
185,000 | Lazard, Ltd. – Class “A” | 6,489,800 | |||
210,000 | * | Nasdaq OMX Group, Inc. | 4,080,300 | ||
250,000 | New York Community Bancorp, Inc. | 4,062,500 | |||
235,000 | NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. | 2,965,700 | |||
170,000 | Protective Life Corporation | 3,699,200 | |||
185,000 | SPDR KBW Regional Banking (ETF) | 4,238,350 | |||
268,905 | * | Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (REIT) | 2,438,968 | ||
195,000 | Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. – Class “A” | 5,335,200 | |||
67,528,948 | |||||
Health Care—10.3% | |||||
45,000 | Beckman Coulter, Inc. | 2,195,550 | |||
35,000 | * | Cephalon, Inc. | 2,185,400 | ||
75,000 | DENTSPLY International, Inc. | 2,397,750 | |||
62,500 | * | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 2,225,625 | ||
52,500 | * | Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings | 4,117,575 | ||
67,500 | McKesson Corporation | 4,170,150 | |||
65,000 | * | Mettler-Toledo International, Inc. | 8,088,600 | ||
20,000 | Perrigo Company | 1,284,400 | |||
44,500 | * | PSS World Medical, Inc. | 951,410 | ||
148,600 | * | Sirona Dental Systems, Inc. | 5,355,544 |
107 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Health Care (continued) | |||||
55,000 | * | St. Jude Medical, Inc. | $ 2,163,700 | ||
100,000 | * | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 4,788,000 | ||
165,000 | Warner Chilcott, PLC – Class “A” | 3,702,600 | |||
43,626,304 | |||||
Industrials—14.3% | |||||
50,000 | A.O. Smith Corporation | 2,894,500 | |||
125,000 | * | Armstrong World Industries, Inc. | 5,188,750 | ||
162,400 | Baldor Electric Company | 6,560,960 | |||
140,000 | * | Chicago Bridge & Iron Company NV – NY Shares | 3,423,000 | ||
73,300 | * | Esterline Technologies Corporation | 4,194,959 | ||
95,000 | * | Generac Holdings, Inc. | 1,295,800 | ||
168,200 | IDEX Corporation | 5,972,782 | |||
82,500 | J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. | 2,862,750 | |||
165,000 | * | MasTec, Inc. | 1,702,800 | ||
179,700 | * | Mobile Mini, Inc. | 2,756,598 | ||
140,000 | Republic Services, Inc. | 4,268,600 | |||
25,000 | Rolls-Royce Group, PLC (ADR) | 1,181,500 | |||
40,000 | Roper Industries, Inc. | 2,607,200 | |||
95,000 | Snap-on, Inc. | 4,418,450 | |||
217,200 | TAL International Group, Inc. | 5,260,584 | |||
77,500 | Triumph Group, Inc. | 5,780,725 | |||
60,369,958 | |||||
Information Technology—14.6% | |||||
200,000 | * | Avago Technologies, Ltd. | 4,502,000 | ||
405,000 | * | Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. | 2,365,200 | ||
65,000 | * | CACI International, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,941,900 | ||
160,500 | * | Comtech Telecommunications Corporation | 4,389,675 | ||
155,000 | * | FEI Company | 3,033,350 | ||
55,000 | * | Fiserv, Inc. | 2,960,100 | ||
245,000 | * | Genpact, Ltd. | 4,343,850 | ||
226,200 | Intersil Corporation – Class “A” | 2,644,278 | |||
75,000 | * | Intuit, Inc. | 3,285,750 | ||
125,000 | * | JDA Software Group, Inc. | 3,170,000 | ||
85,000 | * | JDS Uniphase Corporation | 1,053,150 | ||
31,400 | * | ManTech International Corporation – Class “A” | 1,243,440 | ||
290,000 | National Semiconductor Corporation | 3,703,300 | |||
35,700 | * | NCI, Inc. – Class “A” | 675,444 | ||
144,300 | * | NetScout Systems, Inc. | 2,959,593 | ||
120,000 | * | SRA International, Inc. – Class “A” | 2,366,400 |
108 |
Shares or | ||||||
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Information Technology (continued) | ||||||
297,725 | * | Symantec Corporation | $ 4,516,488 | |||
225,000 | Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (ETF) | 5,179,500 | ||||
210,000 | Tyco Electronics, Ltd. | 6,136,200 | ||||
61,469,618 | ||||||
Materials—8.7% | ||||||
110,000 | Agrium, Inc. | 8,248,900 | ||||
50,000 | Allegheny Technologies, Inc. | 2,322,500 | ||||
125,000 | Bemis Company, Inc. | 3,968,750 | ||||
45,000 | Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | 3,842,550 | ||||
275,000 | * | Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. | 3,861,000 | |||
80,000 | * | Metals USA Holdings Corporation | 1,038,400 | |||
160,000 | Olin Corporation | 3,225,600 | ||||
40,000 | Praxair, Inc. | 3,610,400 | ||||
70,000 | Sigma-Aldrich Corporation | 4,226,600 | ||||
125,000 | Temple-Inland, Inc. | 2,332,500 | ||||
36,677,200 | ||||||
Telecommunication Services—.8% | ||||||
186,300 | NTELOS Holdings Corporation | 3,152,196 | ||||
Utilities—4.1% | ||||||
111,000 | AGL Resources, Inc. | 4,257,960 | ||||
110,000 | Portland General Electric Company | 2,230,800 | ||||
125,000 | SCANA Corporation | 5,040,000 | ||||
100,000 | Wisconsin Energy Corporation | 5,780,000 | ||||
17,308,760 | ||||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $366,825,042) | 417,085,296 | |||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS—1.2% | ||||||
Money Market Fund | ||||||
$ 5,120 | M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% | ||||
(cost $5,120,000)** | 5,120,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $371,945,042) | 100.0 | % | 422,205,296 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | — | 41,331 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $422,246,627 |
109 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
OPPORTUNITY FUND
September 30, 2010
* Non-income producing
** Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
Summary of Abbreviations:
ADR | American Depositary Receipts | |
ETF | Exchange Traded Fund | |
REIT | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | |||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | ||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | |||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | ||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 417,085,296 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 417,085,296 | |||
Money Market Fund | 5,120,000 | — | — | 5,120,000 | |||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 422,205,296 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 422,205,296 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for the portfolio.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
110 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors Special Situations Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 12.3% for Class A shares and 11.6% for Class B shares.
Over the course of the reporting period, the stock market continued the rally that began in March of 2009; small-cap stocks continued to outperform large-cap stocks, with the Russell 2000 Index beating the S&P 500 Index by 319 basis points. The stock market remained volatile, however, and experienced a sharp summer correction before rallying again in September. In our view, the primary drivers of the September rally were low valuations after the sell-off during the summer; better-than-expected earnings growth in the second quarter; heightened M&A activity; and finally, a recognition that the economy had not fallen back into recession.
The Fund’s top performing sector for the fiscal year was health care, which returned 38%, compared to 7.6% for the Russell 2000 Index sector. The sector had fallen out of favor during the debate over health care reform. We added to two existing positions, Endo Pharmaceuticals and Magellan Health Care, and initiated a third position in AMERIGROUP, all at valuations of less than 10 times free cash flow. We had followed each of these companies for several years, and felt quite comfortable with their business plans, management teams and ability to generate cash flow over long time periods. When health care legislation finally passed, the market once again focused on each company’s individual financial prospects, and the three stocks were top performers for the Fund during the review period.
The Fund also benefited from the increased pace of mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) during the period. Two of the Fund’s positions were acquired in 2010: Sybase and American Italian Pasta Company. Sybase had been a Fund holding since March of 2008, with an original cost of approximately $26 per share. The company performed exceptionally well during the downturn, growing revenue by 20% from 2007 to 2010 (based on our most recent estimates) and growing earnings per share from $1.50 to $2.50. In July, SAP acquired Sybase for $65 per share.
The Fund’s most challenging sector during the period was financials, which returned 0.4%, compared to 9% for the Russell 2000 Index sector. Last fiscal year, financials was our top-performing sector, due to our decision to avoid bank stocks. This year, as bank stocks recovered from the financial crisis, the Fund’s lack of exposure to the industry negatively impacted results. We remain cautious on the industry, however, given the high level of delinquencies and foreclosures in the mortgage sector. Performance in financials was also affected by a slowdown in trading volumes at two of our brokerage holdings, Piper Jaffray and Knight Capital Group.
111 |
Portfolio Managers’ Letter (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
We continue to view the economic environment with a degree of caution. However, we are also still finding attractively valued investment candidates. Given low interest rates, high cash levels and the pent-up demand for acquisitions among corporations and private equity funds, we believe M&A activity will continue to increase. In summary, we do not believe that volatility in the equity markets is behind us; nonetheless we are happy with the valuations we are finding, and we believe low interest rates and a resurgent M&A market will help to realize value going forward.
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
112 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,002.92 | $7.58 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,017.50 | $7.64 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $999.44 | $11.08 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,013.99 | $11.16 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.51% for Class A shares and 2.21% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Expenses paid during the period are net of expenses waived.
Portfolio Composition
TOP TEN SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total market value of investments.
113 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors Special Situations Fund (Class A shares) and the Russell 2000 Index.
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors Special Situations Fund (Class A shares) beginning 9/30/10 with a theoretical investment in the Russell 2000 Index (the “Index”). The Index is an unmanaged Index that measures the performance of the small-cap segment of the U.S. equity universe. The Index is a subset of the Russell 3000 Index representing approximately 10% of the total market capitalization of that index. The Index includes approximately 2000 of the smallest securities based on a combination of their market cap and current index membership. It is not possible to invest directly in this Index. In addition, the Index does not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been assumed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all divi dends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in the sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75% (prior to 6/17/02, the maximum sales charge was 6.25%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 5.70%, 2.29% and (1.61%), respectively. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return for One Year, Five Years and Ten Years would have been 7.41%, 2.42% and (1.48%), respectively.
Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Index figures are from Frank Russell and Company and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
114 |
Portfolio of Investments
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
COMMON STOCKS—94.6% | |||||
Consumer Discretionary—10.6% | |||||
120,679 | American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. | $ 1,805,358 | |||
135,900 | * | Big Lots, Inc. | 4,518,675 | ||
179,200 | * | Career Education Corporation | 3,847,424 | ||
360,100 | Foot Locker, Inc. | 5,232,253 | |||
160,800 | Men’s Wearhouse, Inc. | 3,825,432 | |||
101,500 | Phillips Van-Heusen Corporation | 6,106,240 | |||
335,300 | Regal Entertainment Group – Class “A” | 4,399,136 | |||
29,734,518 | |||||
Consumer Staples—3.4% | |||||
44,200 | Corn Products International, Inc. | 1,657,500 | |||
308,600 | * | Dole Food Company, Inc. | 2,823,690 | ||
68,000 | * | Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. | 1,475,600 | ||
61,800 | J. M. Smucker Company | 3,740,754 | |||
9,697,544 | |||||
Energy—9.6% | |||||
224,875 | * | Carrizo Oil & Gas, Inc. | 5,383,508 | ||
235,898 | EXCO Resources, Inc. | 3,507,803 | |||
288,912 | * | Matrix Service Company | 2,527,980 | ||
181,700 | * | Plains Exploration & Production Company | 4,845,939 | ||
359,600 | * | Resolute Energy Corporation | 3,977,176 | ||
91,000 | SM Energy Company | 3,408,860 | |||
35,700 | * | Whiting Petroleum Corporation | 3,409,707 | ||
27,060,973 | |||||
Financials—15.5% | |||||
14,592 | * | Alleghany Corporation | 4,421,814 | ||
107,700 | American Financial Group, Inc. | 3,293,466 | |||
32,400 | Everest Re Group, Ltd. | 2,801,628 | |||
246,600 | * | EZCORP, Inc. – Class “A” | 4,941,864 | ||
112,900 | Harleysville Group, Inc. | 3,701,991 | |||
149,000 | * | Hilltop Holdings, Inc. | 1,427,420 | ||
193,200 | Jefferies Group, Inc. | 4,383,708 | |||
346,800 | * | Knight Capital Group, Inc. – Class “A” | 4,296,852 | ||
7,000 | * | Markel Corporation | 2,412,130 |
115 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | |||
Financials (continued) | |||||
583,600 | MFA Financial, Inc. (REIT) | $ 4,452,868 | |||
84,200 | Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (REIT) | 4,907,176 | |||
92,600 | * | Piper Jaffray Companies, Inc. | 2,697,438 | ||
43,738,355 | |||||
Health Care—13.2% | |||||
129,800 | * | AMERIGROUP Corporation | 5,512,606 | ||
159,200 | * | Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. | 5,291,808 | ||
121,200 | * | Life Technologies Corporation | 5,658,828 | ||
108,500 | * | Magellan Health Services, Inc. | 5,125,540 | ||
95,300 | * | MEDNAX, Inc. | 5,079,490 | ||
176,700 | * | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | 2,899,647 | ||
231,500 | PerkinElmer, Inc. | 5,356,910 | |||
178,627 | * | Res-Care, Inc. | 2,370,380 | ||
37,295,209 | |||||
Industrials—7.8% | |||||
43,200 | * | Alliant Techsystems, Inc. | 3,257,280 | ||
159,600 | * | Chart Industries, Inc. | 3,249,456 | ||
75,200 | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | 2,278,560 | |||
157,100 | * | EMCOR Group, Inc. | 3,863,089 | ||
95,000 | * | FTI Consulting, Inc. | 3,295,550 | ||
107,700 | * | Orion Marine Group, Inc. | 1,336,557 | ||
36,500 | Precision Castparts Corporation | 4,648,275 | |||
21,928,767 | |||||
Information Technology—17.9% | |||||
630,400 | * | Brightpoint, Inc. | 4,406,496 | ||
509,600 | * | Compuware Corporation | 4,346,888 | ||
278,800 | * | Convergys Corporation | 2,913,460 | ||
130,800 | * | Cymer, Inc. | 4,850,064 | ||
88,727 | * | Diodes, Inc. | 1,516,344 | ||
319,000 | EarthLink, Inc. | 2,899,710 | |||
120,500 | Fair Isaac Corporation | 2,971,530 | |||
468,600 | * | Lawson Software, Inc. | 3,969,042 | ||
118,000 | Lender Processing Services, Inc. | 3,921,140 | |||
269,600 | * | Microsemi Corporation | 4,623,640 |
116 |
Shares or | ||||||
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Information Technology (continued) | ||||||
322,900 | * | QLogic Corporation | $ 5,695,956 | |||
407,800 | * | Verigy, Ltd. | 3,315,414 | |||
503,500 | * | Vishay Intertechnology, Inc. | 4,873,880 | |||
50,303,564 | ||||||
Materials—13.8% | ||||||
102,100 | AptarGroup, Inc. | 4,662,907 | ||||
56,200 | Compass Minerals International, Inc. | 4,306,044 | ||||
272,024 | * | Innospec, Inc. | 4,142,926 | |||
203,700 | Olin Corporation | 4,106,592 | ||||
89,000 | Schnitzer Steel Industries, Inc. – Class “A” | 4,296,920 | ||||
178,600 | Sensient Technologies Corporation | 5,445,514 | ||||
142,400 | Silgan Holdings, Inc. | 4,514,080 | ||||
190,300 | * | Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation | 3,495,811 | |||
126,800 | Westlake Chemical Corporation | 3,795,124 | ||||
38,765,918 | ||||||
Telecommunication Services—1.8% | ||||||
519,400 | * | Premiere Global Services, Inc. | 3,677,352 | |||
51,375 | Telephone & Data Systems, Inc. – Special Shares | 1,456,481 | ||||
5,133,833 | ||||||
Utilities—1.0% | ||||||
160,900 | CMS Energy Corporation | 2,899,418 | ||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $225,840,018) | 266,558,099 | |||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS—4.2% | ||||||
Money Market Fund | ||||||
$ 11,865 | M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% | ||||
(cost $11,865,000)** | 11,865,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $237,705,018) | 98.8 | % | 278,423,099 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.2 | 3,227,476 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $281,650,575 |
117 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND
September 30, 2010
* Non-income producing
** Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
Summary of Abbreviations:
REIT Real Estate Investment Trust
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | |||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | ||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | |||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | ||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 266,558,099 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 266,558,099 | |||
Money Market Fund | 11,865,000 | — | — | 11,865,000 | |||||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 278,423,099 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 278,423,099 |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the industry categorization for the portfolio.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
118 | See notes to financial statements |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Dear Investor:
This is the annual report for the First Investors International Fund for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. During the period, the Fund’s return on a net asset value basis was 14.6% for Class A shares and 13.8% for Class B shares, including dividends of 2.1 cents per share on Class A shares.
Late in 2009 and into 2010, as economies stabilized, leaders in countries throughout the world debated the best ways to restore economic health. Some nations decided that Keynesian measures would lead to greater stability, while others determined that balancing budgets was the better choice. Their decisions necessitated some changes in the Fund’s portfolio holdings. As governments in Europe sought to raise revenue, we became uncomfortable with the visibility surrounding regulated public utilities and sold the portfolio’s positions in RWE in Germany, Terna in Italy, and Red Electrica and Ena-gas in Spain. The health care industry also came under pressure during the reporting period, as the fiscal crisis forced many European governments, which run largely public health systems, to cut expenditures. Consequently, we reduced our exposure to Roche.
The Fund outperformed its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index, during the reporting period, aided by strong results from its positions in emerging markets companies, particularly those in India and Brazil. These positions, which on average represented approximately 24% of the portfolio, were some of the Fund’s top performers. The benchmark, by contrast, had no allocations to India, Brazil, or any other emerging market. In India, HDFC Bank, Housing Development Finance, and ITC delivered strong absolute returns. In Brazil, Souza Cruz, Ambev, and AES Tiete made positive contributions to performance. Novo Nordisk, a leader in diabetes treatments, consistently delivered strong performance over the reporting period. Financials were the top-performing sector in the portfolio during the period. While the Fund was underweight this sector relative to the benchmark, its holdings performed substantially better than the benchmark’s. Consumer staples companies, whic h are heavily weighted in the portfolio, also made positive contributions to absolute and relative performance during the period. Currency hedging also aided performance.
Despite the market’s rally late in the reporting period, we do not believe that the global macroeconomic environment has changed significantly. In fact, analysts have recently begun to cut earnings expectations for 2011. This indicates that they may have been too optimistic about near-term prospects for a strong global recovery. Regardless, we believe the companies held by the Fund are well positioned to perform in this uncertain market environment.
119 |
Portfolio Manager’s Letter (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Thank you for placing your trust in First Investors. As always, we appreciate the opportunity to serve your investment needs.
120 |
Fund Expenses (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
The examples below show the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your Fund and will help you in comparing these costs with costs of other mutual funds. Please refer to page 3 for a detailed explanation of the information presented in these examples.
Beginning | Ending | ||
Account | Account | Expenses Paid | |
Value | Value | During Period | |
(4/1/10) | (9/30/10) | (4/1/10–9/30/10)* | |
Expense Example – Class A Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,058.21 | $10.01 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,015.34 | $9.80 |
Expense Example – Class B Shares | |||
Actual | $1,000.00 | $1,053.14 | $13.59 |
Hypothetical | |||
(5% annual return before expenses) | $1,000.00 | $1,011.83 | $13.31 |
* Expenses are equal to the annualized expense ratio of 1.94% for Class A shares and 2.64% for Class B shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
Portfolio Composition
TOP SECTORS
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of September 30, 2010, and are based on the total market value of investments.
121 |
Cumulative Performance Information (unaudited)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Fund (Class A shares), the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) EAFE Index (Gross) and the Morgan Stanley Capital International (“MSCI”) EAFE Index (Net).
The graph compares a $10,000 investment in the First Investors International Fund (Class A shares) beginning 6/27/06 (inception date) with theoretical investments in the MSCI EAFE Index (Gross) and the MSCI EAFE Index Net)(the “Indices”). The Indices are free float-adjusted market capitalization indices that measure developed foreign market equity performance, excluding the U.S. and Canada. The MSCI EAFE Index (Gross) is calculated on a total-return basis with the maximum possible dividend reinvestment (before taxes). The MSCI EAFE Index (Net) is calculated on a total-return basis with the minimum possible dividend reinvestment (after taxes). The Indices are unmanaged and it is not possible to invest directly in these Indices. In addition, the Indices do not reflect fees and expenses associated with the active management of a mutual fund portfolio. For purposes of the graph and the accompanying table, unless otherwise indicated, it has been ass umed that the maximum sales charge was deducted from the initial $10,000 investment in the Fund and all dividends and distributions were reinvested. Class B shares performance may be greater than or less than that shown in the line graph above for Class A shares based on differences in sales loads and fees paid by shareholders investing in the different classes.
* Average Annual Total Return figures (for the periods ended 9/30/10) include the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions. “N.A.V. Only” returns are calculated without sales charges. The Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” returns shown are based on the maximum sales charge of 5.75%. The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” returns are adjusted for the applicable deferred sales charge (maximum of 4% in the first year). During the periods shown, some of the expenses of the Fund were waived or assumed. If such expenses had been paid by the Fund, the Class A “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (.57%). The Class B “S.E.C. Standardized” Average Annual Total Return Since Inception would have been (.34%).
Results represent past performance and do not indicate future results. The graph and the returns shown do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than the original cost. Indices figures are from Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc. and all other figures are from First Investors Management Company, Inc.
122 |
Portfolio of Investments
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | ||
COMMON STOCKS—97.5% | ||||
United Kingdom—30.3% | ||||
54,769 | Admiral Group, PLC | $ 1,437,837 | ||
275,417 | Amlin, PLC | 1,741,646 | ||
195,932 | British American Tobacco, PLC | 7,331,241 | ||
88,100 | Bunzl, PLC | 1,053,701 | ||
190,452 | Capita Group, PLC | 2,358,892 | ||
79,676 | De La Rue, PLC | 829,278 | ||
154,008 | Diageo, PLC | 2,659,829 | ||
101,560 | Domino’s Pizza UK & IRL, PLC | 751,538 | ||
294,344 | G4S, PLC | 1,180,901 | ||
176,970 | Imperial Tobacco Group, PLC | 5,290,137 | ||
70,948 | Reckitt Benckiser Group, PLC | 3,914,103 | ||
69,859 | SABMiller, PLC | 2,240,750 | ||
92,989 | Scottish and Southern Energy, PLC | 1,638,224 | ||
103,451 | Standard Chartered, PLC | 2,976,702 | ||
735,607 | Tesco, PLC | 4,914,865 | ||
40,319,644 | ||||
India—17.7% | ||||
31,057 | Bharat Heavy Electricals, Ltd. | 1,713,025 | ||
116,055 | Cipla, Ltd. | 832,543 | ||
149,800 | HDFC Bank, Ltd. | 8,298,757 | ||
30,814 | Hero Honda Motors, Ltd. | 1,274,116 | ||
412,280 | Housing Development Finance Corporation, Ltd. | 6,727,132 | ||
879,262 | ITC, Ltd. | 3,488,871 | ||
15,562 | Nestle India, Ltd. | 1,171,315 | ||
23,505,759 | ||||
Brazil—9.1% | ||||
122,365 | AES Tiete SA | 1,622,192 | ||
91,062 | CETIP SA – Balcao Organizado de Ativos e Derivatos | 886,863 | ||
160,000 | Cielo SA | 1,378,822 | ||
22,615 | Companhia de Bebidas das Americas (ADR) | 2,799,285 | ||
56,600 | CPFL Energia SA | 1,299,575 | ||
99,700 | Redecard SA | 1,554,760 | ||
52,173 | Souza Cruz SA | 2,632,362 | ||
12,173,859 |
123 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2010
Shares | Security | Value | ||
Switzerland—6.8% | ||||
110,920 | Nestle SA – Registered | $ 5,943,663 | ||
37,163 | Novartis AG – Registered | 2,143,544 | ||
7,190 | Roche Holding AG – Genusscheine | 987,664 | ||
9,074,871 | ||||
Australia—5.8% | ||||
135,749 | Coca-Cola Amatil, Ltd. | 1,574,641 | ||
140,243 | QBE Insurance Group, Ltd. | 2,343,743 | ||
134,134 | Woolworths, Ltd. | 3,745,606 | ||
7,663,990 | ||||
United States—5.4% | ||||
128,829 | Philip Morris International, Inc. | 7,217,000 | ||
France—4.4% | ||||
18,098 | bioMerieux | 1,878,017 | ||
22,700 | Bureau Veritas SA | 1,587,317 | ||
35,058 | Essilor International SA | 2,415,565 | ||
5,880,899 | ||||
Denmark—4.2% | ||||
55,889 | Novo Nordisk A/S – Series “B” | 5,554,396 | ||
Japan—3.7% | ||||
34,150 | Nitori Company, Ltd. | 2,853,328 | ||
46,400 | Secom Company, Ltd. | 2,093,943 | ||
4,947,271 | ||||
Ireland—2.8% | ||||
94,027 | Covidien, PLC | 3,778,945 | ||
Netherlands—2.2% | ||||
33,248 | Core Laboratories NV | 2,927,154 | ||
Canada—2.1% | ||||
81,524 | Canadian Natural Resources, Ltd. | 2,831,506 | ||
Belgium—1.5% | ||||
7,501 | Colruyt SA | 1,985,616 |
124 |
Shares or | ||||||
Principal | ||||||
Amount | Security | Value | ||||
Germany—1.5% | ||||||
14,112 | Muenchener Rueckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG – Registered | $ 1,955,671 | ||||
Total Value of Common Stocks (cost $101,606,418) | 129,816,581 | |||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS—1.5% | ||||||
Money Market Fund | ||||||
$ 2,055 | M | First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, .22% | ||||
(cost $2,055,000)** | 2,055,000 | |||||
Total Value of Investments (cost $103,661,418) | 99.0 | % | 131,871,581 | |||
Other Assets, Less Liabilities | 1.0 | 1,266,681 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | $133,138,262 |
* Non-income producing
** Affiliated unregistered money market fund available only to First Investors funds and certain accounts managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. Rate shown is the 7-day yield at September 30, 2010 (see Note 2).
Summary of Abbreviations:
ADR American Depositary Receipts
Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
125 |
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
INTERNATIONAL FUND
September 30, 2010
The following is a summary, by category of Level, of inputs used to value the Fund’s investments as of September 30, 2010:
Level 2 | |||||||||||
Other | Level 3 | ||||||||||
Level 1 | Significant | Significant | |||||||||
Quoted | Observable | Unobservable | |||||||||
Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Total | ||||||||
Common Stocks | |||||||||||
Consumer Staples | $ | 56,909,284 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 56,909,284 | |||
Financials | 26,368,351 | — | — | 26,368,351 | |||||||
Health Care | 17,590,674 | — | — | 17,590,674 | |||||||
Industrials | 10,817,057 | — | — | 10,817,057 | |||||||
Energy | 5,758,660 | — | — | 5,758,660 | |||||||
Consumer Discretionary | 4,878,982 | — | — | 4,878,982 | |||||||
Utilities | 4,559,991 | — | — | 4,559,991 | |||||||
Information Technology | 2,933,582 | — | — | 2,933,582 | |||||||
Money Market Fund | 2,055,000 | — | — | 2,055,000 | |||||||
Total Investments in Securities* | $ | 131,871,581 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 131,871,581 | |||
Other Financial Instruments** | $ | — | $ | (701,353) | $ | — | $ | (701,353) |
* The Portfolio of Investments provides information on the country categorization for the portfolio.
** Other financial instruments are foreign exchange contracts, which are considered derivative instruments, which are valued at the net unrealized depreciation on the instrument.
There were no transfers into or from Level 1 or Level 2 by the Fund during the year ended September 30, 2010.
126 | See notes to financial statements |
This page left intentionally blank. |
127 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
September 30, 2010
CASH | INVESTMENT | ||||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | GOVERNMENT | GRADE | INCOME | ||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments in securities: | |||||||||||||
Cost – Unaffiliated issuers | $ | 132,483,985 | $ | 322,876,836 | $ | 365,391,377 | $ | 476,499,820 | |||||
Cost – Affiliated money market fund (Note 2) | — | 1,100,000 | 3,650,000 | 17,660,000 | |||||||||
Total cost of investments | $ | 132,483,985 | $ | 323,976,836 | $ | 369,041,377 | $ | 494,159,820 | |||||
Value – Unaffiliated issuers (Note 1A) | $ | 132,483,985 | $ | 335,038,229 | $ | 405,598,024 | $ | 499,669,832 | |||||
Value – Affiliated money market fund (Note 2) | — | 1,100,000 | 3,650,000 | 17,660,000 | |||||||||
Total value of investments | 132,483,985 | 336,138,229 | 409,248,024 | 517,329,832 | |||||||||
Cash | 3,756,137 | 170,310 | 109,998 | 2,020,284 | |||||||||
Receivables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | 2,889,800 | 9,154,379 | — | |||||||||
Interest | 100,208 | 1,378,146 | 6,201,049 | 9,869,781 | |||||||||
Shares sold | — | 250,121 | 908,983 | 284,740 | |||||||||
Other assets | 18,464 | 32,889 | 36,668 | 48,486 | |||||||||
Total Assets | 136,358,794 | 340,859,495 | 425,659,101 | 529,553,123 | |||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | — | 3,170,250 | 5,818,881 | 12,687,940 | |||||||||
Shares redeemed | 425,683 | 509,039 | 691,915 | 493,423 | |||||||||
Dividends payable | — | 88,305 | 153,549 | 523,193 | |||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | — | 152,117 | 186,618 | 291,780 | |||||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 55,828 | 56,674 | 69,648 | 97,780 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses | 35,137 | 44,297 | 41,700 | 61,004 | |||||||||
Total Liabilities | 516,648 | 4,020,682 | 6,962,311 | 14,155,120 | |||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 135,842,146 | $ | 336,838,813 | $ | 418,696,790 | $ | 515,398,003 | |||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 135,842,146 | $ | 330,282,277 | $ | 410,491,927 | $ | 762,000,501 | |||||
Undistributed net investment income (deficit) | — | 18,529 | (1,228,073 | ) | 731,963 | ||||||||
Accumulated net realized loss on investments | — | (5,623,386 | ) | (30,773,711 | ) | (270,504,473 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation in value of investments | — | 12,161,393 | 40,206,647 | 23,170,012 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 135,842,146 | $ | 336,838,813 | $ | 418,696,790 | $ | 515,398,003 | |||||
Net Assets: | |||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 134,103,104 | $ | 325,979,197 | $ | 404,841,336 | $ | 504,506,610 | |||||
Class B | $ | 1,739,042 | $ | 10,859,616 | $ | 13,855,454 | $ | 10,891,393 | |||||
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | |||||||||||||
Class A | 134,103,104 | 28,693,702 | 41,278,452 | 202,995,352 | |||||||||
Class B | 1,739,042 | 956,484 | 1,412,479 | 4,377,895 | |||||||||
Net asset value and redemption price per share — Class A | $ | 1.00 | # | $ | 11.36 | $ | 9.81 | $ | 2.49 | ||||
Maximum offering price per share — Class A | |||||||||||||
(Net asset value/.9425)* | N/A | $ | 12.05 | $ | 10.41 | $ | 2.64 | ||||||
Net asset value and offering price per share — Class B (Note 8) | $ | 1.00 | $ | 11.35 | $ | 9.81 | $ | 2.49 |
#Also maximum offering price per share.
*On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced.
128 | See notes to financial statements | 129 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2010
TOTAL | GROWTH & | |||||||||||||||
RETURN | VALUE | BLUE CHIP | INCOME | GLOBAL | ||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in securities: | ||||||||||||||||
Cost – Unaffiliated issuers | $ | 335,072,623 | $ | 309,282,020 | $ | 307,043,743 | $ | 561,158,033 | $ | 215,907,028 | ||||||
Cost – Affiliated money market fund (Note 2) | 5,300,000 | 13,780,000 | 3,295,000 | 27,560,000 | 9,560,000 | |||||||||||
Total cost of investments | $ | 340,372,623 | $ | 323,062,020 | $ | 310,338,743 | $ | $588,718,033 | $ | 225,467,028 | ||||||
Value – Unaffiliated issuers (Note 1A) | $ | 374,677,807 | $ | $331,896,192 | $ | 377,988,425 | $ | 626,456,824 | $ | 262,645,403 | ||||||
Value – Affiliated money market fund (Note 2) | 5,300,000 | 13,780,000 | 3,295,000 | 27,560,000 | 9,560,000 | |||||||||||
Total Value of Investments | 379,977,807 | 345,676,192 | 381,283,425 | 654,016,824 | 272,205,403 | |||||||||||
Cash | 69,907 | 92,818 | 101,851 | 140,958 | 184,611 | |||||||||||
Receivables: | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | 1,466,343 | 451,799 | — | 366,280 | 8,014,161 | |||||||||||
Dividends and interest | 2,046,726 | 741,525 | 540,704 | 794,868 | 465,575 | |||||||||||
Shares sold | 280,496 | 213,018 | 140,706 | 381,715 | 193,991 | |||||||||||
Other assets | 35,621 | 34,265 | 39,935 | 64,349 | 27,107 | |||||||||||
Total Assets | 383,876,900 | 347,209,617 | 382,106,621 | 655,764,994 | 281,090,848 | |||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||
Payables: | ||||||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | 4,920,760 | 503,814 | 130,845 | 1,609,745 | 4,735,489 | |||||||||||
Shares redeemed | 736,436 | 488,962 | 483,151 | 973,020 | 373,877 | |||||||||||
Dividends payable | 28,026 | 19,738 | 6,629 | 10,573 | — | |||||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | 226,869 | 207,557 | 229,275 | 381,154 | 209,831 | |||||||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 86,120 | 84,815 | 125,944 | 185,279 | 78,601 | |||||||||||
Accrued expenses | 53,701 | 46,338 | 51,166 | 75,610 | 67,548 | |||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 6,051,912 | 1,351,224 | 1,027,010 | 3,235,381 | 5,465,346 | |||||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 377,824,988 | $ | 345,858,393 | $ | 381,079,611 | $ | 652,529,613 | $ | 275,625,502 | ||||||
Net Assets Consist of: | ||||||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 347,997,384 | $ | 355,273,426 | $ | 400,443,463 | $ | 607,984,083 | $ | 284,192,262 | ||||||
Undistributed net investment income (deficit) | 202,204 | 775,444 | 793,109 | 734,304 | (127,034 | ) | ||||||||||
Accumulated net realized loss on investments | ||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | (9,979,784 | ) | (32,804,649 | ) | (91,101,643 | ) | (21,487,565 | ) | (55,186,434 | ) | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation in value of investments | ||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 39,605,184 | 22,614,172 | 70,944,682 | 65,298,791 | 46,746,708 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 377,824,988 | $ | 345,858,393 | $ | 381,079,611 | $ | 652,529,613 | $ | 275,625,502 | ||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 360,842,607 | $ | 334,725,193 | $ | 366,656,559 | $ | 626,369,836 | $ | 269,074,977 | ||||||
Class B | $ | 16,982,381 | $ | 11,133,200 | $ | 14,423,052 | $ | 26,159,777 | $ | 6,550,525 | ||||||
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | ||||||||||||||||
Class A | 25,436,773 | 51,465,348 | 18,785,688 | 48,535,131 | 43,828,432 | |||||||||||
Class B | 1,216,838 | 1,739,798 | 794,664 | 2,154,048 | 1,221,117 | |||||||||||
Net asset value and redemption price | ||||||||||||||||
per share – Class A | $ | 14.19 | $ | 6.50 | $ | 19.52 | $ | 12.91 | $ | 6.14 | ||||||
Maximum offering price per share – Class A | ||||||||||||||||
(Net asset value/.9425)* | $ | 15.06 | $ | 6.90 | $ | 20.71 | $ | 13.70 | $ | 6.51 | ||||||
Net asset value and offering price per share – | ||||||||||||||||
Class B (Note 8) | $ | 13.96 | $ | 6.40 | $ | 18.15 | $ | 12.14 | $ | 5.36 |
*On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced.
130 | See notes to financial statements | 131 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2010
SELECT | SPECIAL | ||||||||||||
GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | ||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments in securities: | |||||||||||||
Cost – Unaffiliated issuers | $ | 165,560,027 | $ | 366,825,042 | $ | 225,840,018 | $ | 101,606,418 | |||||
Cost – Affiliated money market fund (Note 2) | 2,135,000 | 5,120,000 | 11,865,000 | 2,055,000 | |||||||||
Total cost of investments | $ | 167,695,027 | $ | 371,945,042 | $ | 237,705,018 | $ | 103,661,418 | |||||
Value – Unaffiliated issuers (Note 1A) | $ | 190,013,939 | $ | 417,085,296 | $ | 266,558,099 | $ | 129,816,581 | |||||
Value – Affiliated money market fund (Note 2) | 2,135,000 | 5,120,000 | 11,865,000 | 2,055,000 | |||||||||
Total Value of Investments | 192,148,939 | 422,205,296 | 278,423,099 | 131,871,581 | |||||||||
Cash | 134,826 | 147,129 | 65,964 | 1,576,375 | |||||||||
Receivables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities sold | — | 610,467 | 3,851,641 | 157,607 | |||||||||
Dividends and interest | 82,450 | 501,344 | 19,463 | 726,648 | |||||||||
Shares sold | 106,861 | 228,916 | 144,330 | 59,640 | |||||||||
Unrealized appreciation of foreign exchange | |||||||||||||
contracts (Note 7) | — | — | — | 1,811,351 | |||||||||
Other assets | 19,394 | 40,441 | 27,149 | 11,586 | |||||||||
Total Assets | 192,492,470 | 423,733,593 | 282,531,646 | 136,214,788 | |||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Payables: | |||||||||||||
Investment securities purchased | — | 383,269 | 163,227 | — | |||||||||
Shares redeemed | 295,127 | 682,917 | 419,046 | 368,850 | |||||||||
Unrealized depreciation of foreign exchange | |||||||||||||
contracts (Note 7) | — | — | — | 2,512,704 | |||||||||
Accrued advisory fees | 114,411 | 248,506 | 178,546 | 104,027 | |||||||||
Accrued shareholder servicing costs | 67,751 | 116,189 | 80,967 | 46,920 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses | 35,630 | 56,085 | 39,285 | 44,025 | |||||||||
Total Liabilities | 512,919 | 1,486,966 | 881,071 | 3,076,526 | |||||||||
Net Assets | $ | 191,979,551 | $ | 422,246,627 | $ | 281,650,575 | $ | 133,138,262 | |||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||||||||||
Capital paid in | $ | 261,851,409 | $ | 377,885,503 | $ | 262,285,116 | $ | 149,563,721 | |||||
Undistributed net investment income | — | 792,807 | — | 2,803,825 | |||||||||
Accumulated net realized loss on investments | |||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | (94,325,770 | ) | (6,691,937 | ) | (21,352,622 | ) | (46,762,258 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized appreciation in value of investments | |||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 24,453,912 | 50,260,254 | 40,718,081 | 27,532,974 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 191,979,551 | $ | 422,246,627 | $ | 281,650,575 | $ | 133,138,262 | |||||
Net Assets: | |||||||||||||
Class A | $ | 183,556,472 | $ | 402,117,078 | $ | 274,073,513 | $ | 129,569,686 | |||||
Class B | $ | 8,423,079 | $ | 20,129,549 | $ | 7,577,062 | $ | 3,568,576 | |||||
Shares outstanding (Note 8): | |||||||||||||
Class A | 31,705,177 | 17,142,795 | 13,268,633 | 12,730,483 | |||||||||
Class B | 1,579,059 | 985,051 | 422,178 | 359,917 | |||||||||
Net asset value and redemption price | |||||||||||||
per share – Class A | $ | 5.79 | $ | 23.46 | $ | 20.66 | $ | 10.18 | |||||
Maximum offering price per share – Class A | |||||||||||||
(Net asset value/.9425)* | $ | 6.14 | $ | 24.89 | $ | 21.92 | $ | 10.80 | |||||
Net asset value and offering price per share – | |||||||||||||
Class B (Note 8) | $ | 5.33 | $ | 20.44 | $ | 17.95 | $ | 9.91 |
*On purchases of $100,000 or more, the sales charge is reduced.
132 | See notes to financial statements | 133 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2010
CASH | INVESTMENT | ||||||||||||
MANAGEMENT | GOVERNMENT | GRADE | INCOME | ||||||||||
Investment Income | |||||||||||||
Income: | |||||||||||||
Interest | $ | 442,389 | $ | 14,423,695 | $ | 20,803,920 | $ | 40,631,759 | |||||
Dividends | — | — | — | 2,523 | |||||||||
Dividends from affiliate (Note 2) | — | 18,629 | 8,982 | 22,413 | |||||||||
Total income | 442,389 | 14,442,324 | 20,812,902 | 40,656,695 | |||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | |||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 748,038 | 2,089,304 | 2,471,743 | 3,528,352 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | — | 913,000 | 1,079,280 | 1,405,293 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | 18,137 | 122,278 | 147,464 | 112,308 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs | 680,548 | 633,143 | 778,263 | 1,096,365 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 43,785 | 51,734 | 63,497 | 76,348 | |||||||||
Registration fees | 46,341 | 51,823 | 49,348 | 41,185 | |||||||||
Custodian fees | 26,934 | 47,250 | 32,086 | 40,220 | |||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 35,008 | 13,920 | 15,080 | 29,949 | |||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 7,734 | 15,733 | 18,489 | 23,907 | |||||||||
Other expenses | 36,761 | 83,727 | 68,046 | 99,505 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 1,643,286 | 4,021,912 | 4,723,296 | 6,453,432 | |||||||||
Less: Expenses waived | (1,197,616 | ) | (348,217 | ) | (411,957 | ) | (171,003 | ) | |||||
Expenses paid indirectly | (3,281 | ) | (1,421 | ) | (1,684 | ) | (2,158 | ) | |||||
Net expenses | 442,389 | 3,672,274 | 4,309,655 | 6,280,271 | |||||||||
Net investment income | — | 10,770,050 | 16,503,247 | 34,376,424 | |||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments (Note 2): | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | — | 3,103,773 | 13,779,861 | (6,736,530 | ) | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | — | 2,718,962 | 16,328,093 | 41,269,692 | |||||||||
Net gain on investments | — | 5,822,735 | 30,107,954 | 34,533,162 | |||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | — | $ | 16,592,785 | $ | 46,611,201 | $ | 68,909,586 |
134 | See notes to financial statements | 135 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2010
TOTAL | GROWTH & | |||||||||||||||
RETURN | VALUE | BLUE CHIP | INCOME | GLOBAL | ||||||||||||
Investment Income | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends | $ | 4,441,306 | (a) | $ | 9,488,807 | (b) | $ | 8,942,698 | (c) | $ | 13,276,646 | (d) | $ | 4,620,727 | (e) | |
Dividends from affiliate (Note 2) | 8,605 | 28,054 | 8,362 | 19,762 | 17,802 | |||||||||||
Interest | 7,276,880 | — | — | — | 59 | |||||||||||
Total income | 11,726,791 | 9,516,861 | 8,951,060 | 13,296,408 | 4,638,588 | |||||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | ||||||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 2,671,189 | 2,508,075 | 2,857,353 | 4,661,337 | 2,582,274 | |||||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | 1,019,838 | 972,211 | 1,103,789 | 1,836,162 | 769,840 | |||||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | 185,523 | 117,734 | 164,250 | 287,195 | 68,841 | |||||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs | 911,213 | 927,172 | 1,373,706 | 2,003,222 | 919,817 | |||||||||||
Professional fees | 52,560 | 52,864 | 61,612 | 91,992 | 44,505 | |||||||||||
Custodian fees | 42,483 | 17,971 | 16,557 | 34,502 | 104,016 | |||||||||||
Registration fees | 47,834 | 37,921 | 40,200 | 42,597 | 42,273 | |||||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 21,740 | 19,630 | 31,056 | 38,849 | 25,188 | |||||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 17,938 | 16,907 | 19,449 | 32,327 | 13,329 | |||||||||||
Other expenses | 74,670 | 66,655 | 72,722 | 111,987 | 89,508 | |||||||||||
Total expenses | 5,044,988 | 4,737,140 | 5,740,694 | 9,140,170 | 4,659,591 | |||||||||||
Less: Expenses waived | — | — | — | — | (79,049 | ) | ||||||||||
Expenses paid indirectly | (2,466 | ) | (2,311 | ) | (2,645 | ) | (4,412 | ) | (1,815 | ) | ||||||
Net expenses | 5,042,522 | 4,734,829 | 5,738,049 | 9,135,758 | 4,578,727 | |||||||||||
Net investment income | 6,684,269 | 4,782,032 | 3,213,011 | 4,160,650 | 59,861 | |||||||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | ||||||||||||||||
(Note 2): | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | ||||||||||||||||
Investments | 4,700,281 | 11,905,008 | 5,636,663 | 3,057,400 | 16,137,871 | |||||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | — | — | — | (134,819 | ) | ||||||||||
Net realized gain on investments | ||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 4,700,281 | 11,905,008 | 5,636,663 | 3,057,400 | 16,003,052 | |||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | 20,333,126 | 14,490,454 | 14,721,082 | 46,947,411 | 2,462,568 | |||||||||||
Net gain on investments and foreign | ||||||||||||||||
currency transactions | 25,033,407 | 26,395,462 | 20,357,745 | 50,004,811 | 18,465,620 | |||||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting | ||||||||||||||||
from Operations | $ | 31,717,676 | $ | 31,177,494 | $ | 23,570,756 | $ | 54,165,461 | $ | 18,525,481 |
(a) Net of $28,291 foreign taxes withheld
(b) Net of $57,018 foreign taxes withheld
(c) Net of $39,544 foreign taxes withheld
(d) Net of $85,363 foreign taxes withheld
(e) Net of $274,008 foreign taxes withheld
136 | See notes to financial statements | 137 |
Statements of Operations
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Year Ended September 30, 2010
SELECT | SPECIAL | ||||||||||||
GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SITUATIONS | INTERNATIONAL | ||||||||||
Investment Income | |||||||||||||
Dividends | $ | 2,006,117 | $ | 6,740,654 | (f) | $ | 3,316,842 | $ | 3,978,081 | (g) | |||
Dividends from affiliate (Note 2) | 4,370 | 5,264 | 27,082 | 5,630 | |||||||||
Interest | — | — | — | 171 | |||||||||
Total income | 2,010,487 | 6,745,918 | 3,343,924 | 3,983,882 | |||||||||
Expenses (Notes 1 and 3): | |||||||||||||
Advisory fees | 1,396,061 | 2,987,526 | 2,515,255 | 1,181,488 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class A | 530,628 | 1,141,999 | 781,606 | 351,196 | |||||||||
Distribution plan expenses – Class B | 92,653 | 217,678 | 81,652 | 34,946 | |||||||||
Shareholder servicing costs | 805,709 | 1,339,881 | 932,820 | 555,659 | |||||||||
Professional fees | 36,625 | 61,461 | 43,475 | 40,397 | |||||||||
Custodian fees | 10,657 | 32,103 | 24,596 | 135,821 | |||||||||
Registration fees | 34,609 | 46,224 | 40,414 | 44,303 | |||||||||
Reports to shareholders | 17,329 | 28,084 | 21,418 | 12,588 | |||||||||
Trustees’ fees | 9,402 | 20,261 | 13,529 | 6,023 | |||||||||
Other expenses | 38,042 | 79,804 | 51,165 | 36,220 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 2,971,715 | 5,955,021 | 4,505,930 | 2,398,641 | |||||||||
Less: Expenses waived | — | — | (365,650 | ) | — | ||||||||
Expenses paid indirectly | (1,282 | ) | (2,771 | ) | (1,850 | ) | (830 | ) | |||||
Net expenses | 2,970,433 | 5,952,250 | 4,138,430 | 2,397,811 | |||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | (959,946 | ) | 793,668 | (794,506 | ) | 1,586,071 | |||||||
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | |||||||||||||
and Foreign Currency Transactions (Note 2): | |||||||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on: | |||||||||||||
Investments | 11,072,238 | 17,731,893 | 26,160,463 | (3,247,752 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | — | — | 476,147 | |||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | |||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 11,072,238 | 17,731,893 | 26,160,463 | (2,771,605 | ) | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation of: | |||||||||||||
Investments | 5,200,313 | 30,124,890 | 5,717,051 | 17,864,235 | |||||||||
Foreign currency transactions | — | — | — | 62,258 | |||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | |||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 5,200,313 | 30,124,890 | 5,717,051 | 17,926,493 | |||||||||
Net gain on investments and foreign currency transactions | 16,272,551 | 47,856,783 | 31,877,514 | 15,154,888 | |||||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | $ | 15,312,605 | $ | 48,650,451 | $ | 31,083,008 | $ | 16,740,959 |
(f) Net of $9,387 foreign taxes withheld
(g) Net of $312,369 foreign taxes withheld
138 | See notes to financial statements | 139 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
CASH MANAGEMENT | GOVERNMENT | INVESTMENT GRADE | INCOME | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | — | $ | 1,221,501 | $ | 10,770,050 | $ | 10,935,987 | $ | 16,503,247 | $ | 15,274,428 | $ | 34,376,424 | $ | 35,830,693 | |||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | — | — | 3,103,773 | 980,301 | 13,779,861 | (12,048,295 | ) | (6,736,530 | ) | (112,253,431 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | — | — | 2,718,962 | 10,055,950 | 16,328,093 | 45,188,050 | 41,269,692 | 88,440,358 | |||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | — | 1,221,501 | 16,592,785 | 21,972,238 | 46,611,201 | 48,414,183 | 68,909,586 | 12,017,620 | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | — | (1,215,241 | ) | (11,719,577 | ) | (11,010,399 | ) | (17,308,661 | ) | (15,729,968 | ) | (35,370,028 | ) | (36,620,365 | ) | ||||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | — | (6,260 | ) | (390,654 | ) | (439,921 | ) | (611,139 | ) | (760,072 | ) | (775,851 | ) | (980,700 | ) | ||||||||||
Total dividends | — | (1,221,501 | ) | (12,110,231 | ) | (11,450,320 | ) | (17,919,800 | ) | (16,490,040 | ) | (36,145,879 | ) | (37,601,065 | ) | ||||||||||
Share Transactions* | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 103,494,290 | 149,200,434 | 77,347,300 | 89,368,837 | 92,777,083 | 62,035,917 | 60,690,077 | 38,647,729 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | 1,183,936 | 10,581,329 | 9,894,128 | 15,532,529 | 13,931,701 | 28,803,544 | 29,097,696 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (141,727,633 | ) | (212,143,550 | ) | (53,101,171 | ) | (50,746,193 | ) | (56,404,349 | ) | (48,574,281 | ) | (55,246,111 | ) | (64,519,916 | ) | |||||||||
(38,233,343 | ) | (61,759,180 | ) | 34,827,458 | 48,516,772 | 51,905,263 | 27,393,337 | 34,247,510 | 3,225,509 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 1,539,880 | 4,860,797 | 1,715,685 | 4,308,972 | 1,808,223 | 2,161,072 | 1,330,180 | 1,369,449 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | 6,061 | 362,862 | 411,452 | 565,450 | 691,880 | 661,566 | 796,975 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (3,230,970 | ) | (5,000,550 | ) | (4,525,074 | ) | (3,684,416 | ) | (5,959,456 | ) | (5,425,434 | ) | (3,552,378 | ) | (4,484,336 | ) | |||||||||
(1,691,090 | ) | (133,692 | ) | (2,446,527 | ) | 1,036,008 | (3,585,783 | ) | (2,572,482 | ) | (1,560,632 | ) | (2,317,912 | ) | |||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from share transactions | (39,924,433 | ) | (61,892,872 | ) | 32,380,931 | 49,552,780 | 48,319,480 | 24,820,855 | 32,686,878 | 907,597 | |||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | (39,924,433 | ) | (61,892,872 | ) | 36,863,485 | 60,074,698 | 77,010,881 | 56,744,998 | 65,450,585 | (24,675,848 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 175,766,579 | 237,659,451 | 299,975,328 | 239,900,630 | 341,685,909 | 284,940,911 | 449,947,418 | 474,623,266 | |||||||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 135,842,146 | $ | 175,766,579 | $ | 336,838,813 | $ | 299,975,328 | $ | 418,696,790 | $ | 341,685,909 | $ | 515,398,003 | $ | 449,947,418 | |||||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 18,529 | $ | 121,938 | $ | (1,228,073 | ) | $ | (732,205 | ) | $ | 731,963 | $ | 1,087,103 | |||||||
*Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 103,494,290 | 149,200,434 | 6,837,194 | 8,119,199 | 9,912,848 | 7,506,299 | 25,340,112 | 18,474,840 | |||||||||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | 1,183,936 | 935,774 | 896,474 | 1,652,178 | 1,685,746 | 11,996,262 | 14,128,160 | |||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (141,727,633 | ) | (212,143,550 | ) | (4,701,354 | ) | (4,609,280 | ) | (6,026,306 | ) | (5,958,625 | ) | (23,070,665 | ) | (31,275,460 | ) | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | (38,233,343 | ) | (61,759,180 | ) | 3,071,614 | 4,406,393 | 5,538,720 | 3,233,420 | 14,265,709 | 1,327,540 | |||||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 1,539,880 | 4,860,797 | 151,892 | 391,751 | 193,657 | 263,623 | 554,862 | 664,130 | |||||||||||||||||
Issued for dividends reinvested | — | 6,061 | 32,138 | 37,308 | 60,264 | 84,000 | 275,454 | 387,573 | |||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (3,230,970 | ) | (5,000,550 | ) | (400,873 | ) | (334,945 | ) | (639,197 | ) | (668,820 | ) | (1,483,639 | ) | (2,160,772 | ) | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares outstanding | (1,691,090 | ) | (133,692 | ) | (216,843 | ) | 94,114 | (385,276 | ) | (321,197 | ) | (653,323 | ) | (1,109,069 | ) |
140 | See notes to financial statements | 141 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
TOTAL RETURN | VALUE | BLUE CHIP | GROWTH & INCOME | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 6,684,269 | $ | 6,724,242 | $ | 4,782,032 | $ | 5,849,817 | $ | 3,213,011 | $ | 4,058,526 | $ | 4,160,650 | $ | 4,423,835 | |||||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 4,700,281 | (9,483,692 | ) | 11,905,008 | (13,268,873 | ) | 5,636,663 | (9,977,253 | ) | 3,057,400 | (20,403,791 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 20,333,126 | 10,774,205 | 14,490,454 | (20,963,487 | ) | 14,721,082 | (31,288,703 | ) | 46,947,411 | (32,959,787 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 31,717,676 | 8,014,755 | 31,177,494 | (28,382,543 | ) | 23,570,756 | (37,207,430 | ) | 54,165,461 | (48,939,743 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | (7,206,405 | ) | (7,294,927 | ) | (4,770,685 | ) | (5,289,493 | ) | (3,748,853 | ) | (3,817,452 | ) | (3,447,522 | ) | (6,507,658 | ) | |||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | (265,077 | ) | (411,162 | ) | (91,965 | ) | (157,251 | ) | (65,517 | ) | (110,020 | ) | (7,107 | ) | (312,817 | ) | |||||||||
Net realized gains – Class A | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (1,098,693 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class B | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (73,074 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total distributions | (7,471,482 | ) | (7,706,089 | ) | (4,862,650 | ) | (5,446,744 | ) | (3,814,370 | ) | (3,927,472 | ) | (3,454,629 | ) | (7,992,242 | ) | |||||||||
Share Transactions * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 65,236,988 | 48,128,682 | 47,998,032 | 46,162,803 | 42,299,508 | 41,475,826 | 86,759,378 | 78,339,719 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 7,095,031 | 7,183,309 | 4,692,913 | 5,211,749 | 3,717,017 | 3,786,180 | 3,415,609 | 7,539,347 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (50,060,155 | ) | (45,000,268 | ) | (51,740,503 | ) | (44,829,250 | ) | (55,163,840 | ) | (46,153,726 | ) | (89,994,980 | ) | (79,223,395 | ) | |||||||||
22,271,864 | 10,311,723 | 950,442 | 6,545,302 | (9,147,315 | ) | (891,720 | ) | 180,007 | 6,655,671 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 1,479,911 | 1,896,768 | 931,640 | 1,383,432 | 1,258,064 | 1,712,240 | 2,407,343 | 2,970,932 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 263,214 | 405,877 | 91,498 | 156,218 | 65,439 | 109,716 | 7,097 | 384,206 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (6,622,753 | ) | (6,192,908 | ) | (3,250,976 | ) | (4,455,394 | ) | (6,213,513 | ) | (6,707,446 | ) | (9,067,038 | ) | (9,309,449 | ) | |||||||||
(4,879,628 | ) | (3,890,263 | ) | (2,227,838 | ) | (2,915,744 | ) | (4,890,010 | ) | (4,885,490 | ) | (6,652,598 | ) | (5,954,311 | ) | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from share transactions | 17,392,236 | 6,421,460 | (1,277,396 | ) | 3,629,558 | (14,037,325 | ) | (5,777,210 | ) | (6,472,591 | ) | 701,360 | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 41,638,430 | 6,730,126 | 25,037,448 | (30,199,729 | ) | 5,719,061 | (46,912,112 | ) | 44,238,241 | (56,230,625 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 336,186,558 | 329,456,432 | 320,820,945 | 351,020,674 | 375,360,550 | 422,272,662 | 608,291,372 | 664,521,997 | |||||||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 377,824,988 | $ | 336,186,558 | $ | 345,858,393 | $ | 320,820,945 | $ | 381,079,611 | $ | 375,360,550 | $ | 652,529,613 | $ | 608,291,372 | |||||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income of | $ | 202,204 | $ | 470,660 | $ | 775,444 | $ | 1,047,762 | $ | 793,109 | $ | 1,394,468 | $ | 734,304 | $ | 34,203 | |||||||||
*Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 4,717,067 | 4,109,052 | 7,583,329 | 8,803,750 | 2,190,993 | 2,580,194 | 6,879,346 | 7,829,046 | |||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 513,741 | 603,791 | 743,977 | 985,364 | 192,725 | 232,570 | 271,569 | 746,863 | |||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (3,616,060 | ) | (3,885,466 | ) | (8,163,446 | ) | (8,634,264 | ) | (2,851,867 | ) | (2,883,244 | ) | (7,135,325 | ) | (8,010,238 | ) | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | 1,614,748 | 827,377 | 163,860 | 1,154,850 | (468,149 | ) | (70,480 | ) | 15,590 | 565,671 | |||||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 108,792 | 165,872 | 149,472 | 272,994 | 69,790 | 115,095 | 203,071 | 317,151 | |||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 19,385 | 34,840 | 14,731 | 30,278 | 3,627 | 7,334 | 584 | 40,830 | |||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (489,191 | ) | (543,696 | ) | (523,549 | ) | (868,516 | ) | (345,863 | ) | (446,123 | ) | (765,993 | ) | (984,923 | ) | |||||||||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | (361,014 | ) | (342,984 | ) | (359,346 | ) | (565,244 | ) | (272,446 | ) | (323,694 | ) | (562,338 | ) | (626,942 | ) |
142 | See notes to financial statements | 143 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
GLOBAL | SELECT GROWTH | OPPORTUNITY | SPECIAL SITUATIONS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income (loss) | $ | 59,861 | $ | 753,481 | $ | (959,946 | ) | $ | (928,942 | ) | $ | 793,668 | $ | 121,938 | $ | (794,506 | ) | $ | 418,246 | ||||||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 16,003,052 | (64,378,267 | ) | 11,072,238 | (72,064,132 | ) | 17,731,893 | (24,480,008 | ) | 26,160,463 | (47,829,807 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 2,462,568 | 63,840,351 | 5,200,313 | 27,119,973 | 30,124,890 | (2,830,615 | ) | 5,717,051 | 32,434,302 | ||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | 18,525,481 | 215,565 | 15,312,605 | (45,873,101 | ) | 48,650,451 | (27,188,685 | ) | 31,083,008 | (14,977,259 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Distributions to Shareholders | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class A | (427,532 | ) | (700,428 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (316,738 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net investment income – Class B | — | (15,414 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | (769 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Distributions in excess of net investment income – Class A | — | (1,000,030 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions in excess of net investment income – Class B | — | (37,956 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class A | — | — | — | — | — | (10,298,045 | ) | — | (6,706,340 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net realized gains – Class B | — | — | — | — | — | (918,722 | ) | — | (335,771 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total distributions | (427,532 | ) | (1,753,828 | ) | — | — | — | (11,216,767 | ) | — | (7,359,618 | ) | |||||||||||||
Share Transactions * | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 37,303,365 | 27,829,425 | 28,932,274 | 30,784,311 | 56,923,811 | 45,788,903 | 35,218,514 | 31,078,864 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | 421,308 | 1,665,406 | — | — | — | 10,254,773 | — | 6,983,764 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (35,543,345 | ) | (27,935,429 | ) | (29,917,838 | ) | (26,091,741 | ) | (56,238,588 | ) | (43,909,512 | ) | (37,396,683 | ) | (29,343,070 | ) | |||||||||
2,181,328 | 1,559,402 | (985,564 | ) | 4,692,570 | 685,223 | 12,134,164 | (2,178,169 | ) | 8,719,558 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 802,245 | 1,013,659 | 778,215 | 1,073,575 | 1,670,590 | 1,869,978 | 668,989 | 785,115 | |||||||||||||||||
Reinvestment of distributions | — | 53,157 | — | — | — | 916,291 | — | 335,504 | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (2,001,142 | ) | (2,161,628 | ) | (3,551,178 | ) | (4,659,036 | ) | (7,204,124 | ) | (7,105,182 | ) | (2,842,096 | ) | (2,961,582 | ) | |||||||||
(1,198,897 | ) | (1,094,812 | ) | (2,772,963 | ) | (3,585,461 | ) | (5,533,534 | ) | (4,318,913 | ) | (2,173,107 | ) | (1,840,963 | ) | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) from share transactions | 982,431 | 464,590 | (3,758,527 | ) | 1,107,109 | (4,848,311 | ) | 7,815,251 | (4,351,276 | ) | 6,878,595 | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | 19,080,380 | (1,073,673 | ) | 11,554,078 | (44,765,992 | ) | 43,802,140 | (30,590,201 | ) | 26,731,732 | (15,458,282 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year | 256,545,122 | 257,618,795 | 180,425,473 | 225,191,465 | 378,444,487 | 409,034,688 | 254,918,843 | 270,377,125 | |||||||||||||||||
End of year† | $ | 275,625,502 | $ | 256,545,122 | $ | 191,979,551 | $ | 180,425,473 | $ | 422,246,627 | $ | 378,444,487 | $ | 281,650,575 | $ | 254,918,843 | |||||||||
†Includes undistributed net investment income (deficit) of | $ | (127,034 | ) | $ | (113,939 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 792,807 | $ | 73,125 | $ | — | $ | 363,450 | |||||||
*Shares Issued and Redeemed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 6,360,255 | 5,981,721 | 5,206,038 | 6,231,108 | 2,558,776 | 2,694,996 | 1,802,540 | 2,014,582 | |||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | 70,927 | 370,090 | — | — | — | 620,749 | — | 471,557 | |||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (6,087,314 | ) | (6,117,705 | ) | (5,392,868 | ) | (5,303,836 | ) | (2,529,554 | ) | (2,613,382 | ) | (1,909,903 | ) | (1,920,295 | ) | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares outstanding | 343,868 | 234,106 | (186,830 | ) | 927,272 | 29,222 | 702,363 | (107,363 | ) | 565,844 | |||||||||||||||
Class B: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sold | 156,238 | 257,172 | 151,295 | 236,169 | 85,932 | 126,727 | 39,330 | 58,566 | |||||||||||||||||
Issued for distributions reinvested | — | 13,356 | — | — | — | 62,889 | — | 25,749 | |||||||||||||||||
Redeemed | (392,927 | ) | (529,400 | ) | (695,270 | ) | (984,800 | ) | (370,238 | ) | (475,942 | ) | (167,386 | ) | (219,514 | ) | |||||||||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | (236,689 | ) | (258,872 | ) | (543,975 | ) | (748,631 | ) | (284,306 | ) | (286,326 | ) | (128,056 | ) | (135,199 | ) |
144 | See notes to financial statements | 145 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
INTERNATIONAL | ||||||
Year Ended September 30 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets From Operations | ||||||
Net investment income | $ | 1,586,071 | $ | 1,022,732 | ||
Net realized loss on investments | ||||||
and foreign currency transactions | (2,771,605 | ) | (23,842,576 | ) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | ||||||
and foreign currency transactions | 17,926,493 | 19,013,662 | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | ||||||
resulting from operations | 16,740,959 | (3,806,182 | ) | |||
Dividends to Shareholders | ||||||
Net investment income – Class A | (255,393 | ) | (1,461,635 | ) | ||
Net investment income – Class B | — | (46,959 | ) | |||
Total dividends | (255,393 | ) | (1,508,594 | ) | ||
Share Transactions * | ||||||
Class A: | ||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 24,832,707 | 22,093,794 | ||||
Reinvestment of dividends | 254,426 | 1,452,292 | ||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (19,203,741 | ) | (15,560,100 | ) | ||
5,883,392 | 7,985,986 | |||||
Class B: | ||||||
Proceeds from shares sold | 434,739 | 520,694 | ||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | 46,946 | ||||
Cost of shares redeemed | (711,435 | ) | (768,606 | ) | ||
(276,696 | ) | (200,966 | ) | |||
Net increase from share transactions | 5,606,696 | 7,785,020 | ||||
Net increase in net assets | 22,092,262 | 2,470,244 | ||||
Net Assets | ||||||
Beginning of year | 111,046,000 | 108,575,756 | ||||
End of year † | $ | 133,138,262 | $ | 111,046,000 | ||
†Includes undistributed net investment income of | $ | 2,803,825 | $ | 994,587 | ||
*Shares Issued and Redeemed | ||||||
Class A: | ||||||
Sold | 2,673,494 | 2,936,440 | ||||
Reinvestment of dividends | 27,299 | 189,594 | ||||
Redeemed | (2,061,028 | ) | (2,078,169 | ) | ||
Net increase in Class A shares outstanding | 639,765 | 1,047,865 | ||||
Class B: | ||||||
Sold | 48,103 | 71,230 | ||||
Reinvestment of dividends | — | 6,234 | ||||
Redeemed | (78,501 | ) | (103,335 | ) | ||
Net decrease in Class B shares outstanding | (30,398 | ) | (25,871 | ) |
146 | See notes to financial statements |
Notes to Financial Statements
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2010
1. Significant Accounting Policies—First Investors Income Funds (“Income Funds”) and First Investors Equity Funds (“Equity Funds”), each a Delaware statutory trust (each a “Trust”, collectively, “the Trusts”), are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“the 1940 Act”) as diversified, open-end management investment companies and operate as series funds. The Income Funds issue shares of beneficial interest in the Cash Management Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund and Fund For Income. The Equity Funds issue shares of beneficial interest in the Total Return Fund, Value Fund, Blue Chip Fund, Growth & Income Fund, Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund, and International Fund (each a “Fund”, collectively, “the Funds”). The Trusts account separately for the assets, liabilities and operation s of each Fund. The objective of each Fund as of September 30, 2010 is as follows:
Cash Management Fund seeks to earn a high rate of current income consistent with the preservation of capital and maintenance of liquidity.
Government Fund seeks to achieve a significant level of current income which is consistent with security and liquidity of principal.
Investment Grade Fund seeks to generate a maximum level of income consistent with investment in investment grade debt securities.
Fund For Income seeks high current income.
Total Return Fund seeks high, long-term total investment return consistent with moderate investment risk.
Value Fund seeks total return.
Blue Chip Fund seeks high total investment return.
Growth & Income Fund seeks long-term growth of capital and current income.
Global Fund seeks long-term capital growth.
Select Growth Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
Opportunity Fund seeks long-term capital growth.
Special Situations Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
International Fund primarily seeks long-term capital growth.
A. Security Valuation—Except as provided below, a security listed or traded on an exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market is valued at its last sale price on the exchange or market where the security is principally traded, and lacking any sales, the security
147 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2010
is valued at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices. Securities traded in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market (including securities listed on exchanges whose primary market is believed to be OTC) are valued at the mean between the last bid and asked prices based on quotes furnished by a market maker for such securities. Securities may also be priced by pricing services approved by the Trusts’ Board of Trustees (the “Board”). The pricing services consider security type, rating, market condition and yield data as well as market quotations, prices provided by market makers and other available information in determining value. Short-term debt securities that mature in 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost.
The Funds monitor for significant events occurring prior to the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange that could have a material impact on the value of any securities that are held by the Funds. Examples of such events include trading halts, natural disasters, political events and issuer-specific developments. If the Valuation Committee decides that such events warrant using fair value estimates, it will take such events into consideration in determining the fair values of such securities. If market quotations or prices are not readily available or determined to be unreliable, the securities will be valued at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to procedures adopted by the Board. The Funds also use a pricing service to fair value foreign securities in the event that fluctuation in U.S. securities markets exceed a predetermined level or if a foreign market is closed. For valuation purposes, where applicable, quotations of foreign securi ties in foreign currency are translated to U.S. dollar equivalents using the foreign exchange quotation in effect. At September 30, 2010, Fund For Income held six securities that were fair valued by its Valuation Committee with an aggregate value of $13,644, representing 0.0% of the Fund’s net assets.
The Cash Management Fund values its portfolio securities in accordance with the amortized cost method of valuation under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act. Amortized cost is an approximation of market value of an instrument, whereby the difference between its acquisition cost and market value at maturity is amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the instrument. The effect of changes in the market value of a security as a result of fluctuating interest rates is not taken into account and thus the amortized cost method of valuation may result in the value of a security being higher or lower than its actual market value.
148 |
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), formerly known as Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, investments held by the Funds are carried at “fair value”. As defined by ASC 820, fair value is the price that a Fund would receive upon selling an investment in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market for the investment under current market conditions.
In addition to defining fair value, ASC 820 established a three-tier hierarchy of inputs to establish a classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad Levels listed below:
Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical securities
Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
Equity securities traded on an exchange or the Nasdaq Stock Market are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy to the extent that they are actively traded and valuation adjustments are not applied. Foreign securities that are fair valued in the event that fluctuations in U.S. securities markets exceed a predetermined level or if a foreign market is closed are categorized in Level 2. Corporate and municipal bonds, asset backed, U.S. Government and U.S. Agency securities are categorized in Level 2 to the extent that the inputs are observable and timely, otherwise they would be categorized as Level 3. Short-term notes that are valued at amortized cost are categorized in Level 2. Investments in the affiliated unregistered money market fund are categorized as Level 1. Foreign exchange contracts that are considered derivative instruments and are valued at the net unrealized appreciation or depreciation on the instruments are categorized in Level 2. Res tricted securities and securities that are fair valued by the Valuation Committee may be categorized in either Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy depending on the relative significance of valuation inputs.
The aggregate value by input level, as of September 30, 2010, for each Fund’s investments is included at the end of each Fund’s portfolio of investments.
In January 2010, FASB released Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU No. 2010-06”). Among the new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures ASU No. 2010-06 requires
149 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2010
the Funds to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements and to describe the reasons for the transfers. Significance shall be judged with respect to total earnings and total assets or total liabilities. ASU No. 2010-06 requires the Level 3 roll forward reconciliation of beginning and ending balances to be prepared on a gross basis, in particular separately presenting information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. ASU No. 2010-06 also requires disclosure of the reasons for significant transfers in and out of Level 3. The Funds adopted ASU No. 2010-06 on January 1, 2010, except for the Level 3 gross basis roll forward reconciliation which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years.
B. Federal Income Taxes—No provision has been made for federal income taxes on net income or capital gains since it is the policy of each Fund to continue to comply with the special provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to investment companies, and to make sufficient distributions of income and capital gains (in excess of any available capital loss carryovers) to relieve it from all, or substantially all, such taxes. At September 30, 2010, capital loss carryovers were as follows:
Year Capital Loss Carryovers Expire | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fund | Total | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | |||||||||||||||||||
Government | $ | 5,623,386 | $ | — | $ | 308,826 | $ | 1,600,894 | $ | 740,643 | $ | 1,909,473 | $ | 1,063,550 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Investment Grade | 30,773,711 | — | — | — | — | 3,567,502 | 401,409 | 26,804,800 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Fund For Income | 259,762,605 | 52,099,335 | 25,740,298 | 10,200,012 | 7,456,986 | 24,660,250 | 5,033,118 | 23,949,720 | 110,622,886 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Return | 8,644,290 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5,168,651 | 3,475,639 | |||||||||||||||||||
Value | 32,785,545 | 14,265,890 | — | — | — | — | — | 18,519,655 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Blue Chip* | 85,083,025 | 70,632,641 | — | — | — | — | — | 12,329,978 | 2,120,406 | |||||||||||||||||||
Growth & Income | 18,969,083 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8,796,265 | 10,172,818 | |||||||||||||||||||
Global | 47,792,818 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18,998,989 | 28,793,829 | |||||||||||||||||||
Select Growth | 94,321,335 | — | — | — | — | — | 2,098,139 | 48,016,088 | 44,207,108 | |||||||||||||||||||
Opportunity | 6,689,308 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4,904,349 | 1,784,959 | |||||||||||||||||||
Special Situations | 19,696,194 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12,205,466 | 7,490,728 | |||||||||||||||||||
International | 42,081,579 | — | — | — | — | 82,339 | 1,552,900 | 19,541,066 | 20,905,274 |
* | For Blue Chip Fund, $1,445,102 of the $85,083,025 capital loss carryover was acquired on August 10, 2007 in the |
tax free reorganization with the First Investors Focused Equity Fund that was approved by the Equity Fund’s Board of | |
Trustees. Due to the reorganization the Fund will have available for utilization $1,445,102 for the taxable year 2011. | |
These capital loss carryovers will expire in 2011. |
150 |
The Funds recognize the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Funds’ tax positions, and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years 2007 – 2009, or expected to be taken in the Funds’ 2010 tax returns. The Funds identify their major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal, New York State, New York City and foreign jurisdictions where the Funds make significant investments; however the Funds are not aware of any tax position for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next twelve months.
C. Distributions to Shareholders—Dividends from net investment income of the Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund and Fund For Income are generally declared daily and paid monthly. The Cash Management Fund declares distributions, if any, daily and pays distributions monthly. Distributions are declared from the total of net investment income plus or minus all realized short-term gains and losses on investments. Dividends from net investment income, if any, of Total Return Fund, Value Fund, Blue Chip Fund and Growth & Income Fund are declared and paid quarterly. Dividends from net investment income, if any, of, Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund, and International Fund are declared and paid annually. Distributions from net realized capital gains of each of the other Funds, if any, are normally declared and paid annually. Income dividends and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences are primarily due to differing treatments for capital loss carryforwards, deferral of wash sales losses, post-October capital losses, net operating losses and foreign currency transactions.
D. Expense Allocation—Expenses directly charged or attributable to a Fund are paid from the assets of that Fund. General expenses of the Trusts are allocated among and charged to the assets of each Fund on a fair and equitable basis, which may be based on the relative assets of each Fund or the nature of the services performed and relative applicability to each Fund.
E. Use of Estimates—The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
151 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2010
F. Foreign Currency Translations—The accounting records of Global Fund and International Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Portfolio securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars at the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities, dividend income and certain expenses are translated to U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions.
Global Fund and International Fund do not isolate that portion of gains and losses on investments which is due to changes in foreign exchange rates from that which is due to changes in market prices of the investments. These changes are included with the net realized and unrealized gains and losses from investments.
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions include gains and losses from the sales of foreign currency and gains and losses on accrued foreign dividends and related withholding taxes.
G. Other—Security transactions are generally accounted for on the first business day following the date the securities are purchased or sold, except for financial reporting purposes, which is trade date. Cost is determined, and gains and losses are based, on the identified cost basis for both financial statement and federal income tax purposes. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income and estimated expenses are accrued daily. Bond discounts and premiums are accreted or amortized using the interest method. The Bank of New York Mellon (“BONY”) custodian for the Income Funds has provided credits in the amount of $15 against custodian charges based on the uninvested cash balances of the Funds. For the period, October 1, 2009 through October 7, 2009 BONY served as custodian for the Total Return, Value, Blue Chip, Growth & Income, Select Growth, Opportunity and Special Situations Funds. Effective October 8, 2009, Bro wn Brothers Harriman & Co. (“BBH”) became the custodian for the Total Return, Value, Blue Chip, Growth & Income, Select Growth, Opportunity and Special Situations Funds. BBH has served as custodian to the Global Fund and the International Fund since the Funds’ inception. The Funds reduced expenses through brokerage service arrangements. For the year ended September 30, 2010, expenses were reduced by $8,529 for the Income Funds and by $20,382 for the Equity Funds under these arrangements.
152 |
2. Security Transactions—For the year ended September 30, 2010, purchases and sales of securities and long-term U.S. Government obligations (excluding U.S. Treasury bills, short-term securities and foreign currencies) were as follows:
Long-Term U.S. | |||||||||||||
Securities | Government Obligations | ||||||||||||
Cost of | Proceeds | Cost of | Proceeds | ||||||||||
Fund | Purchases | of Sales | Purchases | of Sales | |||||||||
Government | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 173,541,167 | $ | 132,723,220 | |||||
Investment Grade | 247,932,895 | 197,172,275 | — | 10,077,313 | |||||||||
Fund For Income | 387,773,765 | 364,653,517 | — | — | |||||||||
Total Return | 129,837,657 | 106,406,251 | 28,320,240 | 35,190,753 | |||||||||
Value | 69,920,485 | 68,860,323 | — | — | |||||||||
Blue Chip | 72,826,002 | 83,616,930 | — | — | |||||||||
Growth & Income | 156,063,424 | 186,090,359 | — | — | |||||||||
Global | 231,024,612 | 230,735,483 | — | — | |||||||||
Select Growth | 178,708,367 | 183,157,725 | — | — | |||||||||
Opportunity | 159,640,238 | 167,973,059 | — | — | |||||||||
Special Situations | 162,161,036 | 174,906,697 | — | — | |||||||||
International | 42,334,340 | 37,213,147 | — | — |
At September 30, 2010, aggregate cost and net unrealized appreciation of securities for federal income tax purposes were as follows:
Gross | Gross | Net | |||||||||||
Aggregate | Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||
Fund | Cost | Appreciation | Depreciation | Appreciation | |||||||||
Government | $ | 323,976,836 | $ | 12,304,291 | $ | 142,898 | $ | 12,161,393 | |||||
Investment Grade | 370,435,547 | 39,157,008 | 344,531 | 38,812,477 | |||||||||
Fund For Income | 494,665,193 | 34,519,480 | 11,854,840 | 22,664,640 | |||||||||
Total Return | 342,131,222 | 52,958,606 | 15,112,020 | 37,846,586 | |||||||||
Value | 323,081,125 | 48,370,158 | 25,775,090 | 22,595,068 | |||||||||
Blue Chip | 316,357,361 | 85,839,270 | 20,913,207 | 64,926,063 | |||||||||
Growth & Income | 591,236,515 | 125,288,199 | 62,507,890 | 62,780,309 | |||||||||
Global | 232,860,644 | 43,702,185 | 4,357,427 | 39,344,758 | |||||||||
Select Growth | 167,699,462 | 27,458,571 | 3,009,094 | 24,449,477 | |||||||||
Opportunity | 371,947,668 | 87,264,170 | 37,006,542 | 50,257,628 | |||||||||
Special Situations | 239,361,446 | 47,437,630 | 8,375,977 | 39,061,653 | |||||||||
International | 104,582,469 | 28,478,123 | 1,189,011 | 27,289,112 |
153 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2010
Certain of the Funds may invest in First Investors Cash Reserve Fund, LLC (“Cash Reserve Fund”), an affiliated unregistered money market fund managed by First Investors Management Company, Inc. During the year ended September 30, 2010, purchases, sales and dividend income earned by the Funds that invested in the Cash Reserve Fund were as follows:
Value at | Purchase | Sales | Value at | Dividend | ||||||||||||
Fund | 9/30/09 | Shares/Cost | Shares/Costs | 9/30/10 | Income | |||||||||||
Government | $ | 17,018,000 | $ | 101,525,000 | $ | 117,443,000 | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 18,629 | ||||||
Investment Grade | 5,775,000 | 86,175,000 | 88,300,000 | 3,650,000 | 8,982 | |||||||||||
Fund For Income | 4,170,000 | 198,080,000 | 184,590,000 | 17,660,000 | 22,413 | |||||||||||
Total Return | 700,000 | 75,865,000 | 71,265,000 | 5,300,000 | 8,605 | |||||||||||
Value | 15,725,000 | 42,030,000 | 43,975,000 | 13,780,000 | 28,054 | |||||||||||
Blue Chip | 7,485,000 | 41,085,000 | 45,275,000 | 3,295,000 | 8,362 | |||||||||||
Growth & Income | 5,405,000 | 116,200,000 | 94,045,000 | 27,560,000 | 19,762 | |||||||||||
Global | 11,955,000 | 55,985,000 | 58,380,000 | 9,560,000 | 17,802 | |||||||||||
Select Growth | 2,435,000 | 18,350,000 | 18,650,000 | 2,135,000 | 4,370 | |||||||||||
Opportunity | 3,830,000 | 76,125,000 | 74,835,000 | 5,120,000 | 5,264 | |||||||||||
Special Situations | 10,031,000 | 107,805,000 | 105,971,000 | 11,865,000 | 27,082 | |||||||||||
International | 1,250,000 | 29,215,000 | 28,410,000 | 2,055,000 | 5,630 |
3. Advisory Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates—Certain officers and trustees of the Trusts are officers and directors of the Trusts’ investment adviser, First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”), their underwriter, First Investors Corporation (“FIC”), their transfer agent, Administrative Data Management Corp. (“ADM”) and/or First Investors Federal Savings Bank (“FIFSB”), custodian of the Funds’ retirement accounts. Trustees of the Trusts who are not “interested persons” of the Funds as defined in the 1940 Act are remunerated by the Funds. For the year ended September 30, 2010, total trustees fees accrued by the Income Funds and Equity Funds amounted to $65,863 and $149,165, respectively.
The Investment Advisory Agreements provide as compensation to FIMCO, an annual fee, payable monthly, at the following rates:
Cash Management Fund—.50% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. During the period October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010, FIMCO has voluntarily waived $679,446 in advisory fees to limit the Fund’s overall expense ratio to .60% on Class A shares and 1.35% on Class B shares. Also, FIMCO has voluntarily waived an additional $68,592 in advisory fees and assumed $405,058 of other expenses to prevent a negative yield on the Fund’s shares.
154 |
Government and Investment Grade Funds—.66% on the first $500 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2010, FIMCO has voluntarily waived 16.7% of the .66% annual fee to limit the advisory fee to .55% of each Fund’s average daily net assets.
Fund For Income—.75% on the first $250 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .72% on the next $250 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $2.25 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2010, FIMCO has voluntarily waived 6.7% of the .75% annual fee to limit the advisory fee to .70% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Total Return, Value, Blue Chip, Growth & Income, Select Growth, and Opportunity Funds—.75% on the first $300 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, .72% on the next $200 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, declining by .02% on each $500 million thereafter, down to .60% on average daily net assets over $2.25 billion.
Special Situations Fund—1% on the first $200 million of the Fund’s average daily net assets, .75% on the next $300 million, .72% on the next $250 million, .69% on the next $250 million, .66% on the next $500 million, and .64% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2010, FIMCO has voluntarily waived 20% of the 1% annual fee to limit the advisory fee to .80% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
Global and International Funds—.98% on the first $300 million of each Fund’s average daily net assets, .95% on the next $300 million, .92% on the next $400 million, .90% on the next $500 million and .88% on average daily net assets over $1.5 billion. For the year ended September 30, 2010, FIMCO has voluntarily waived 3.1% of the .98% annual fee on Global Fund to limit the advisory fee to .95% of the Fund’s average daily net assets.
For the year ended September 30, 2010, total advisory fees accrued to FIMCO by the Income Funds and Equity Funds were $8,837,437 and $23,360,558, respectively, of which $1,679,215 and $444,699, respectively, was voluntarily waived by FIMCO as noted above.
155 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2010
For the year ended September 30, 2010, FIC, as underwriter, received from the Income Funds and Equity Funds $6,768,239 and $15,324,094, respectively, in commissions in connection with the sale of shares of the Funds, after allowing $125,789 and $7,845, respectively, to other dealers. For the year ended September 30, 2010, shareholder servicing costs for the Income Funds and Equity Funds included $2,512,303 (of which $44,520 was voluntarily waived by ADM on the Cash Management Fund) and $7,115,154, respectively, in transfer agent fees accrued to ADM and $413,851 and $1,957,902, respectively, in retirement accounts custodian fees accrued to FIFSB.
Pursuant to Distribution Plans adopted under Rule 12b-1 of the 1940 Act, each Fund, other than the Cash Management Fund, is authorized to pay FIC a fee up to .30% of the average daily net assets of the Class A shares and 1% of the average daily net assets of the Class B shares on an annualized basis each fiscal year, payable monthly. The Cash Management Fund is authorized to pay FIC a fee of 1% of the average daily net assets of the Class B shares. The fee consists of a distribution fee and a service fee. The service fee is paid for the ongoing servicing of clients who are shareholders of that Fund. For the year ended September 30, 2010, total distribution plan fees accrued to FIC by the Income Funds and Equity Funds amounted to $3,797,760 and $9,757,741, respectively.
Muzinich & Co., Inc., serves as investment subadviser to Fund For Income. Wellington Management Company, LLP serves as investment subadviser to Global Fund, Smith Asset Management Group, L.P. serves as investment subadviser to Select Growth Fund, Paradigm Capital Management, Inc. serves as investment subadviser to Special Situations Fund and Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. serves as investment subadviser to International Fund. The subadvisers are paid by FIMCO and not by the Funds.
4. Restricted Securities—Certain restricted securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 and may only be sold to qualified institutional investors. Unless otherwise noted, these 144A securities are deemed to be liquid. At September 30, 2010, Investment Grade Fund held eighteen 144A securities with an aggregate value of $57,616,787 representing 13.8% of the Fund’s net assets, Fund For Income held seventy-two 144A securities with an aggregate value of $174,000,806 representing 33.8% of the Fund’s net assets, Total Return Fund held sixteen 144A securities with an aggregate value of $17,607,422 representing 4.7% of the Fund’s net assets. Certain restricted securities are exempt from the registration requirements under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and may only be sold to qualified investors. Unless otherwise noted, these Section 4(2) securities are deemed to be liquid. At September 30, 2010, Cash Management Fund held eight Section 4(2) securities with an aggregate value of $28,092,919
156 |
representing 20.7% of the Fund’s net assets. These securities are valued as set forth in Note 1A.
5. High Yield Credit Risk—The investments of Fund For Income in high yield securities whether rated or unrated may be considered speculative and subject to greater market fluctuations and risks of loss of income and principal than lower-yielding, higher-rated, fixed-income securities. The risk of loss due to default by the issuer may be significantly greater for holders of high-yielding securities, because such securities are generally unsecured and are often subordinated to other creditors of the issuer.
6. Forward Currency Contracts—Forward currency contracts are obligations to purchase or sell a specific currency for an agreed-upon price at a future date. When the Global Fund and the International Fund purchase or sell foreign securities they may enter into a forward currency contract to minimize foreign exchange risk between the trade date and the settlement date of such transactions. The Funds could be exposed to risk if counter parties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts or if the value of the foreign currency changes unfavorably. Forward currency contracts are “marked-to-market” daily at the applicable translation rate and the resulting unrealized gains or losses are reflected in the Funds’ assets.
The Global Fund and International Fund had no forward currency contracts outstanding at September 30, 2010.
7. Foreign Exchange Contracts—The Global Fund and the International Fund may enter into foreign exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of foreign currencies at negotiated rates at future dates. These contracts are considered derivative instruments and are used to decrease exposure to foreign exchange risk associated with foreign currency denominated securities held by the Funds. The Funds could be exposed to risk if counter parties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts or if the value of the foreign currency changes unfavorably. Foreign exchange contracts are “marked-to-market” daily at the applicable translation rate and the resulting unrealized gains and losses are reflected in the Funds’ assets.
The Global Fund had no foreign exchange contracts open at September 30, 2010.
157 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2010
The International Fund had the following foreign exchange contracts open at September 30, 2010:
Contracts to Buy | Unrealized | ||||||||||||
Foreign Currency | In Exchange for | Settlement Date | Gain | ||||||||||
426,031,000 | Indian Rupee | US | $ | 9,083,145 | 11/18/10 | US | $ | 397,906 | |||||
4,747,000 | Australian Dollar | 4,285,259 | 11/19/10 | 311,028 | |||||||||
2,627,000 | Swiss Franc | 2,397,248 | 11/19/10 | 291,733 | |||||||||
1,728,000 | Canadian Dollar | 1,655,759 | 11/30/10 | 28,697 | |||||||||
4,532,000 | Brazilian Real | 2,447,929 | 12/2/10 | 227,080 | |||||||||
4,723,000 | Euro | 5,948,388 | 12/10/10 | 499,482 | |||||||||
2,769,000 | Euro | 3,724,831 | 2/14/11 | 55,425 | |||||||||
$ | 29,542,559 | $ | 1,811,351 | ||||||||||
Contracts to Sell | Unrealized | ||||||||||||
Foreign Currency | In Exchange for | Settlement Date | Loss | ||||||||||
426,031,000 | Indian Rupee | US | $ | 9,265,010 | 11/18/10 | US | $ | (216,040 | ) | ||||
4,747,000 | Australian Dollar | 4,042,516 | 11/19/10 | (553,771 | ) | ||||||||
2,627,000 | Swiss Franc | 2,303,506 | 11/19/10 | (385,475 | ) | ||||||||
1,728,000 | Canadian Dollar | 1,641,164 | 11/30/10 | (43,292 | ) | ||||||||
4,532,000 | Brazilian Real | 2,384,667 | 12/2/10 | (290,342 | ) | ||||||||
4,723,000 | Euro | 5,665,333 | 12/10/10 | (782,537 | ) | ||||||||
9,653,000 | British Pound | 15,153,955 | 2/14/11 | (57,202 | ) | ||||||||
2,769,000 | Euro | 3,596,211 | 2/14/11 | (184,045 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 44,052,362 | $ | (2,512,704 | ) | |||||||||
Net Unrealized Loss on Foreign Exchange Contracts | $ | (701,353 | ) |
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments—The fair value of International Fund’s derivative instruments as of September 30, 2010, was as follows:
Assets Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | ||||
Derivatives not accounted | Statements of | Statements of | |||
for as hedging instruments | Assets and | Assets and | |||
under ASC 815* | Liabilities Location | Value | Liabilities Location | Value | |
Foreign exchange contracts: | Unrealized | Unrealized | |||
appreciation of | depreciation of | ||||
foreign exchange | foreign exchange | ||||
contracts | $1,811,351 | contracts | $2,512,704 |
158 |
The effect of International Fund’s derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations are as follows:
Amount of Realized Gain or Loss Recognized on Derivatives | ||
Derivatives not accounted | Net Realized Gain | |
for as hedging instruments | on Foreign Currency | |
under ASC 815* | Transactions | |
Foreign currency transactions: | $476,147 | |
Amount of Change in Unrealized Gain or Loss Recognized on Derivatives | ||
Derivatives not accounted | Net Unrealized Appreciation | |
for as hedging instruments | on Foreign Currency | |
under ASC 815* | Transactions | |
Foreign currency transactions: | $62,258 |
* Formerly known as Statement 133 |
8. Capital—The Trusts are authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of beneficial interest without par value. The Trusts consist of the Funds listed on the cover page, each of which is a separate and distinct series of the Trusts. Each Fund has designated two classes of shares, Class A shares and Class B shares (each, a “Class”). Each share of each Class has an equal beneficial interest in the assets, has identical voting, dividend, liquidation and other rights and is subject to the same terms and conditions except that expenses allocated to a Class may be borne solely by that Class as determined by the Trustees and a Class may have exclusive voting rights with respect to matters affecting only that Class. Cash Management Fund’s Class A and Class B shares are sold without an initial sales charge; however, its Class B shares may only be acquired through an exchange of Class B shares from another Fi rst Investors eligible Fund or through the reinvestment of dividends on Class B shares and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge at the rate of 4% in the first year and declining to 0% over a six-year period, which is payable to FIC as underwriter of the Trusts. The Class A and Class B shares sold by the other Funds have a public offering price that reflects different sales charges and expense levels. Class A shares are sold with an initial sales charge of up to 5.75% of the amount invested and together with the Class B shares are subject to distribution plan fees as described in Note 3. Class B shares are sold without an initial sales charge, but are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge which declines in steps from 4% to 0% over a six-year period. Class B shares automatically convert into Class A shares after eight years. Realized and unrealized gains or losses, investment income and expenses (other than distribution plan fees) are allocated daily to each class of sh ares based upon the relative proportion of net assets to each class.
159 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2010
9. Tax Components of Capital and Distributions to Shareholders—The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 were as follows:
Year Ended September 30, 2010 | Year Ended September 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions | Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||
Declared from | Declared from | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term | Long-Term | ||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary | Capital | Ordinary | Capital | ||||||||||||||||
Fund | Income | Gain | Total | Income | Gain | Total | |||||||||||||
Cash Management | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,221,501 | $ | — | $ | 1,221,501 | |||||||
Government | 12,110,231 | — | 12,110,231 | 11,450,320 | — | 11,450,320 | |||||||||||||
Investment Grade | 17,919,800 | — | 17,919,800 | 16,490,040 | — | 16,490,040 | |||||||||||||
Fund For Income | 36,145,879 | — | 36,145,879 | 37,601,065 | — | 37,601,065 | |||||||||||||
Total Return | 7,471,481 | — | 7,471,481 | 7,706,089 | — | 7,706,089 | |||||||||||||
Value | 4,862,650 | — | 4,862,650 | 5,446,744 | — | 5,446,744 | |||||||||||||
Blue Chip | 3,814,370 | — | 3,814,370 | 3,927,472 | — | 3,927,472 | |||||||||||||
Growth & Income | 3,454,629 | — | 3,454,629 | 7,540,914 | 451,328 | 7,992,242 | |||||||||||||
Global | 427,532 | — | 427,532 | 1,753,828 | — | 1,753,828 | |||||||||||||
Opportunity | — | — | — | 1,730,190 | 9,486,577 | 11,216,767 | |||||||||||||
Special Situations | — | — | — | 317,507 | 7,042,111 | 7,359,618 | |||||||||||||
International | 255,393 | — | 255,393 | 1,508,594 | — | 1,508,594 |
As of September 30, 2010, the components of distributable earnings (deficit) on a tax basis were as follows:
Total | |||||||||||||||||
Undistributed | Other | Distributable | |||||||||||||||
Ordinary | Capital Losses | Accumulated | Unrealized | Earnings | |||||||||||||
Fund | Income | Carryover | Losses* | Appreciation | (Deficit) | ** | |||||||||||
Government | $ | 18,529 | $ | (5,623,386 | ) | $ | — | $ | 12,161,393 | $ | 6,556,536 | ||||||
Investment Grade | 166,097 | (30,773,711 | ) | — | 38,812,477 | 8,204,863 | |||||||||||
Fund For Income | 1,236,333 | (259,762,605 | ) | (10,740,866 | ) | 22,664,640 | (246,602,498 | ) | |||||||||
Total Return | 625,308 | (8,644,290 | ) | — | 37,846,586 | 29,827,604 | |||||||||||
Value | 775,444 | (32,785,545 | ) | — | 22,595,068 | (9,415,033 | ) | ||||||||||
Blue Chip | 793,110 | (85,083,025 | ) | — | 64,926,063 | (19,363,852 | ) | ||||||||||
Growth & Income | 734,304 | (18,969,083 | ) | — | 62,780,309 | 44,545,530 | |||||||||||
Global | — | (47,792,818 | ) | (115,498 | ) | 39,341,556 | (8,566,760 | ) | |||||||||
Select Growth | — | (94,321,335 | ) | — | 24,449,477 | (69,871,858 | ) | ||||||||||
Opportunity | 792,804 | (6,689,308 | ) | — | 50,257,628 | 44,361,124 | |||||||||||
Special Situations | — | (19,696,194 | ) | — | 39,061,653 | 19,365,459 | |||||||||||
International | 2,309,035 | (42,081,579 | ) | (3,942,027 | ) | 27,289,112 | (16,425,459 | ) |
* | Other accumulated losses consist primarily of post-October loss deferrals. |
** | Differences between book distributable earnings and tax distributable earnings consist primarily of wash |
sales, post-October loss deferrals and amortization of bond premium and discounts. |
160 |
For the year ended September 30, 2010, the following reclassifications were made to reflect permanent differences between book and tax reporting which are primarily due to the differences between book and tax treatment of investments in real estate trusts and passive foreign investment companies, foreign currency transactions and expiration of capital loss carryovers.
Undistributed | ||||||||||||
Ordinary | Accumulated | |||||||||||
Income | Capital Gains | Unrealized | ||||||||||
Capital Paid In | (Deficit) | (Losses) | Appreciation | |||||||||
Government | $ | — | $ | 1,236,772 | $ | (1,236,772 | ) | $ | — | |||
Investment Grade | — | 920,686 | (920,686 | ) | — | |||||||
Fund For Income | (18,563,112 | ) | 694,315 | 17,868,797 | — | |||||||
Total Return | — | 518,757 | (520,645 | ) | 1,888 | |||||||
Value | 36,104 | (191,700 | ) | 13,985 | 141,611 | |||||||
Blue Chip | (14,615,567 | ) | — | 14,615,567 | — | |||||||
Growth & Income | 2 | (5,920 | ) | — | 5,918 | |||||||
Global | (461,114 | ) | 354,576 | 106,538 | — | |||||||
Select Growth | (959,946 | ) | 959,946 | — | — | |||||||
Opportunity | — | (73,986 | ) | (62,229 | ) | 136,215 | ||||||
Special Situations | (794,504 | ) | 431,056 | 363,448 | — | |||||||
International | (2,414 | ) | 478,560 | (476,146 | ) | — |
10. Reorganizations—On August 10, 2007, First Investors Blue Chip Fund (“Blue Chip Fund”) acquired all of the net assets of the First Investors Focused Equity Fund (“Focused Equity Fund”) in connection with a tax-free reorganization that was approved by the Equity Fund’s Board of Trustees.
11. Subsequent Events—Subsequent events occurring after September 30, 2010 have been evaluated for potential impact to this report through the date the financial statements were issued. There were no subsequent events to report that would have a material impact on the Funds’ financial statements.
12. Foresters Transaction—On September 21, 2010, First Investors Consolidated Corporation (“FICC”), the parent company of FIMCO, entered into an agreement with The Independent Order of Foresters (“Foresters”) pursuant to which FICC will be acquired by Foresters (the “Transaction”). As a result of the Transaction, FIMCO will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Foresters. Foresters is a fraternal benefit society with financial services operations in Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom.
161 |
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
September 30, 2010
The closing of the Transaction is subject to a number of conditions, including obtaining regulatory approvals in the U.S. and Canada, and obtaining the approval of the Board of Trustees and shareholders of the First Investors Funds of new investment advisory agreements between FIMCO and the Funds to take effect upon the closing. The Board of Trustees of the Funds approved the new investment advisory agreements (and certain other actions that are required for the Transaction to close) at a meeting on September 16, 2010. The new investment advisory agreements were approved by the shareholders of each Fund at a shareholders meeting held on November 19, 2010. Assuming that all conditions are satisfied, the Transaction could close as early as December 31, 2010.
162 |
This page left intentionally blank. |
163 |
Financial Highlights
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
The following table sets forth the per share operating performance data for a share outstanding,
total return, ratios to average net assets and other supplemental data for each fiscal year ended
September 30.
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average Net | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Year | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in millions) | Credits | Credits(a) | Income | Expenses | Income (Loss) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||
CASH MANAGEMENT FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $1.00 | $.038 | — | $.038 | $.038 | — | $.038 | $1.00 | 3.89 | % | $200 | .78 | % | .79 | % | 3.85 | % | 1.01 | % | 3.62 | % | — | |||||||||||
2007 | 1.00 | .045 | — | .045 | .045 | — | .045 | 1.00 | 4.59 | 218 | .80 | .81 | 4.51 | .93 | 4.38 | — | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | 1.00 | .027 | — | .027 | .027 | — | .027 | 1.00 | 2.69 | 234 | .80 | .80 | 2.63 | .92 | 2.51 | — | |||||||||||||||||
2009 | 1.00 | .005 | — | .005 | .005 | — | .005 | 1.00 | .54 | 172 | .71 | .71 | .58 | 1.03 | .26 | — | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | .00 | 134 | .30 | .30 | .00 | 1.08 | (.78 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 1.00 | .031 | — | .031 | .031 | — | .031 | 1.00 | 3.11 | 3 | 1.53 | 1.54 | 3.10 | 1.76 | 2.87 | — | |||||||||||||||||
2007 | 1.00 | .037 | — | .037 | .037 | — | .037 | 1.00 | 3.81 | 2 | 1.55 | 1.56 | 3.76 | 1.68 | 3.63 | — | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | 1.00 | .019 | — | .019 | .019 | — | .019 | 1.00 | 1.92 | 4 | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.88 | 1.67 | 1.76 | — | |||||||||||||||||
2009 | 1.00 | .001 | — | .001 | .001 | — | .001 | 1.00 | .14 | 3 | 1.13 | 1.13 | .16 | 1.78 | (.49 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 1.00 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1.00 | .00 | 2 | .30 | .30 | .00 | 1.83 | (1.53 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
GOVERNMENT FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $10.88 | $.45 | $(.13 | ) | $.32 | $.49 | — | $.49 | $10.71 | 3.02 | % | $186 | 1.10 | % | 1.11 | % | 4.14 | % | 1.35 | % | 3.89 | % | 43 | % | |||||||||
2007 | 10.71 | .49 | (.06 | ) | .43 | .50 | — | .50 | 10.64 | 4.07 | 199 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 4.62 | 1.24 | 4.48 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | 10.64 | .49 | .11 | .60 | .48 | — | .48 | 10.76 | 5.73 | 228 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 4.29 | 1.24 | 4.15 | 37 | |||||||||||||||||
2009 | 10.76 | .47 | .44 | .91 | .47 | — | .47 | 11.20 | 8.59 | 287 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 4.03 | 1.26 | 3.87 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 11.20 | .43 | .16 | .59 | .43 | — | .43 | 11.36 | 5.39 | 326 | 1.13 | 1.13 | 3.44 | 1.24 | 3.33 | 42 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 10.87 | .36 | (.12 | ) | .24 | .40 | — | .40 | 10.71 | 2.32 | 13 | 1.85 | 1.86 | 3.39 | 2.10 | 3.14 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 10.71 | .41 | (.06 | ) | .35 | .42 | — | .42 | 10.64 | 3.33 | 12 | 1.82 | 1.83 | 3.90 | 1.96 | 3.76 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | 10.64 | .41 | .12 | .53 | .41 | — | .41 | 10.76 | 4.99 | 12 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 3.59 | 1.94 | 3.45 | 37 | |||||||||||||||||
2009 | 10.76 | .39 | .43 | .82 | .39 | — | .39 | 11.19 | 7.75 | 13 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 3.33 | 1.96 | 3.17 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 11.19 | .35 | .17 | .52 | .36 | — | .36 | 11.35 | 4.70 | 11 | 1.83 | 1.83 | 2.74 | 1.94 | 2.63 | 42 |
164 | 165 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average Net | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Year | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in millions) | Credits | Credits(a) | Income | Expenses | Income | Rate | |||||||||||||||||
INVESTMENT GRADE FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $9.76 | $.44 | $ (.19 | ) | $ .25 | $.49 | — | $.49 | $9.52 | 2.69 | % | $231 | 1.10 | % | 1.11 | % | 4.35 | % | 1.27 | % | 4.18 | % | 74 | % | |||||||||
2007 | 9.52 | .45 | (.09 | ) | .36 | .46 | — | .46 | 9.42 | 3.91 | 271 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 4.58 | 1.22 | 4.46 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | 9.42 | .48 | (1.20 | ) | (.72 | ) | .47 | — | .47 | 8.23 | (8.12 | ) | 268 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 4.80 | 1.23 | 4.67 | 127 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 8.23 | .49 | .85 | 1.34 | .47 | — | .47 | 9.10 | 17.06 | 325 | 1.10 | 1.10 | 5.29 | 1.27 | 5.12 | 79 | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 9.10 | .44 | .72 | 1.16 | .45 | — | .45 | 9.81 | 13.09 | 405 | 1.12 | 1.12 | 4.75 | 1.23 | 4.64 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 9.75 | .30 | (.12 | ) | .18 | .42 | — | .42 | 9.51 | 1.92 | 24 | 1.85 | 1.86 | 3.60 | 2.02 | 3.43 | 74 | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 9.51 | .35 | (.05 | ) | .30 | .40 | — | .40 | 9.41 | 3.17 | 22 | 1.82 | 1.83 | 3.86 | 1.94 | 3.74 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | 9.41 | .42 | (1.21 | ) | (.79 | ) | .40 | — | .40 | 8.22 | (8.78 | ) | 17 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 4.10 | 1.93 | 3.97 | 127 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 8.22 | .44 | .85 | 1.29 | .40 | — | .40 | 9.11 | 16.35 | 16 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 4.59 | 1.97 | 4.42 | 79 | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 9.11 | .39 | .70 | 1.09 | .39 | — | .39 | 9.81 | 12.20 | 14 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 4.05 | 1.93 | 3.94 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
INCOME FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $3.07 | $.22 | $(.06 | ) | $.16 | $.22 | — | $.22 | $3.01 | 5.40 | % | $555 | 1.30 | % | 1.31 | % | 7.28 | % | N/A | N/A | 28 | % | |||||||||||
2007 | 3.01 | .21 | (.02 | ) | .19 | .21 | — | .21 | 2.99 | 6.38 | 563 | 1.28 | 1.29 | 7.00 | N/A | N/A | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2.99 | .21 | (.54 | ) | (.33 | ) | .21 | — | .21 | 2.45 | (11.58 | ) | 460 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 7.40 | 1.30 | 7.39 | 17 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 2.45 | .20 | (.13 | ) | .07 | .20 | — | .20 | 2.32 | 4.28 | 438 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 9.10 | 1.42 | 9.06 | 73 | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2.32 | .17 | .18 | .35 | .18 | — | .18 | 2.49 | 15.68 | 505 | 1.29 | 1.29 | 7.32 | 1.33 | 7.28 | 78 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 3.06 | .20 | (.06 | ) | .14 | .20 | — | .20 | 3.00 | 4.64 | 31 | 2.00 | 2.01 | 6.58 | N/A | N/A | 28 | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 3.00 | .19 | (.01 | ) | .18 | .19 | — | .19 | 2.99 | 5.99 | 25 | 1.98 | 1.99 | 6.30 | N/A | N/A | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2.99 | .19 | (.54 | ) | (.35 | ) | .19 | — | .19 | 2.45 | (12.25 | ) | 15 | 1.99 | 1.99 | 6.70 | 2.00 | 6.69 | 17 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 2.45 | .19 | (.13 | ) | .06 | .18 | — | .18 | 2.33 | 3.75 | 12 | 2.08 | 2.08 | 8.40 | 2.12 | 8.36 | 73 | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2.33 | .16 | .16 | .32 | .16 | — | .16 | 2.49 | 14.43 | 11 | 1.99 | 1.99 | 6.62 | 2.03 | 6.58 | 78 |
* Calculated without sales charges. |
** Net of expenses waived or assumed by FIMCO and ADM (Note 3). |
(a) The ratios do not include a reduction of expenses from cash balances maintained with the custodian |
or from brokerage service arrangements (Note 1G). |
166 | See notes to financial statements | 167 |
Financial Highlights
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
The following table sets forth the per share operating performance data for a share outstanding,
total return, ratios to average net assets and other supplemental data for each fiscal year ended
September 30.
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average Net | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net Realized | Net Asset | Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Net | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Investment | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Year | Income | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in millions) | Credits | Credits(a) | Income | Expenses | Income | Rate | |||||||||||||||||
TOTAL RETURN FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $13.93 | $.23 | $ .64 | $ .87 | $.23 | $— | $.23 | $14.57 | 6.24 | % | $312 | 1.37 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.63 | % | 1.44 | % | 1.57 | % | 57 | % | ||||||||||
2007 | 14.57 | .29 | 1.40 | 1.69 | .30 | .10 | .40 | 15.86 | 11.68 | 355 | 1.32 | 1.33 | 2.05 | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | 15.86 | .36 | (2.31 | ) | (1.95 | ) | .37 | .30 | .67 | 13.24 | (12.66 | ) | 304 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 2.32 | N/A | N/A | 59 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 13.24 | .30 | .03 | .33 | .32 | — | .32 | 13.25 | 2.77 | 316 | 1.43 | 1.43 | 2.35 | N/A | N/A | 53 | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 13.25 | .28 | .95 | 1.23 | .29 | — | .29 | 14.19 | 9.38 | 361 | 1.37 | 1.37 | 2.02 | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 13.73 | .13 | .63 | .76 | .13 | — | .13 | 14.36 | 5.53 | 36 | 2.07 | 2.08 | .93 | 2.14 | .87 | 57 | |||||||||||||||||
2007 | 14.36 | .14 | 1.42 | 1.56 | .19 | .10 | .29 | 15.63 | 10.93 | 34 | 2.02 | 2.03 | 1.35 | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | 15.63 | .26 | (2.29 | ) | (2.03 | ) | .27 | .30 | .57 | 13.03 | (13.35 | ) | 25 | 2.04 | 2.04 | 1.62 | N/A | N/A | 59 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 13.03 | .21 | .03 | .24 | .23 | — | .23 | 13.04 | 2.10 | 21 | 2.13 | 2.13 | 1.65 | N/A | N/A | 53 | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 13.04 | .18 | .94 | 1.12 | .20 | — | .20 | 13.96 | 8.62 | 17 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 1.32 | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
VALUE FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $6.61 | $.09 | $ .78 | $ .87 | $.08 | — | $.08 | $7.40 | 13.22 | % | $337 | 1.39 | % | 1.40 | % | 1.29 | % | N/A | N/A | 15 | % | ||||||||||||
2007 | 7.40 | .10 | .74 | .84 | .10 | — | .10 | 8.14 | 11.36 | 414 | 1.32 | 1.33 | 1.34 | N/A | N/A | 8 | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | 8.14 | .12 | (1.49 | ) | (1.37 | ) | .12 | — | .12 | 6.65 | (16.91 | ) | 334 | 1.35 | 1.35 | 1.62 | N/A | N/A | 17 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 6.65 | .11 | (.64 | ) | (.53 | ) | .11 | — | .11 | 6.01 | (7.81 | ) | 308 | 1.48 | 1.48 | 2.14 | N/A | N/A | 15 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 6.01 | .09 | .49 | .58 | .09 | — | .09 | 6.50 | 9.76 | 335 | 1.38 | 1.38 | 1.45 | N/A | N/A | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 6.51 | .04 | .76 | .80 | .03 | — | .03 | 7.28 | 12.34 | 28 | 2.09 | 2.10 | .59 | N/A | N/A | 15 | |||||||||||||||||
2007 | 7.28 | .05 | .72 | .77 | .04 | — | .04 | 8.01 | 10.64 | 27 | 2.02 | 2.03 | .64 | N/A | N/A | 8 | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | 8.01 | .07 | (1.46 | ) | (1.39 | ) | .07 | — | .07 | 6.55 | (17.42 | ) | 17 | 2.05 | 2.05 | .92 | N/A | N/A | 17 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 6.55 | .08 | (.64 | ) | (.56 | ) | .07 | — | .07 | 5.92 | (8.43 | ) | 12 | 2.18 | 2.18 | 1.44 | N/A | N/A | 15 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 5.92 | .05 | .48 | .53 | .05 | — | .05 | 6.40 | 8.97 | 11 | 2.08 | 2.08 | .75 | N/A | N/A | 21 |
168 | 169 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average Net | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Year | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in millions) | Credits | Credits(a) | Income (Loss) | Expenses | Income (Loss) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||
BLUE CHIP FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $20.60 | $.10 | $1.82 | $1.92 | $.07 | — | $.07 | $22.45 | 9.31 | % | $438 | 1.46 | % | 1.46 | % | .47 | % | 1.50 | % | .43 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||||
2007 | 22.45 | .15 | 3.17 | 3.32 | .13 | — | .13 | 25.64 | 14.81 | 526 | 1.39 | 1.39 | .65 | N/A | N/A | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | 25.64 | .21 | (5.18 | ) | (4.97 | ) | .19 | — | .19 | 20.48 | (19.43 | ) | 396 | 1.40 | 1.41 | .86 | N/A | N/A | 8 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 20.48 | .21 | (1.95 | ) | (1.74 | ) | .20 | — | .20 | 18.54 | (8.36 | ) | 357 | 1.57 | 1.57 | 1.27 | N/A | N/A | 11 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 18.54 | .17 | 1.01 | 1.18 | .20 | — | .20 | 19.52 | 6.36 | 367 | 1.46 | 1.46 | .86 | N/A | N/A | 19 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 19.30 | (.08 | ) | 1.72 | 1.64 | — | — | — | 20.94 | 8.50 | 44 | 2.16 | 2.16 | (.23 | ) | 2.20 | (.27 | ) | 6 | ||||||||||||||
2007 | 20.94 | (.06 | ) | 3.00 | 2.94 | — | — | — | 23.88 | 14.04 | 46 | 2.09 | 2.09 | (.05 | ) | N/A | N/A | 3 | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 23.88 | .03 | (4.80 | ) | (4.77 | ) | .04 | — | .04 | 19.07 | (20.00 | ) | 27 | 2.10 | 2.11 | .16 | N/A | N/A | 8 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 19.07 | .09 | (1.82 | ) | (1.73 | ) | .09 | — | .09 | 17.25 | (9.00 | ) | 18 | 2.27 | 2.27 | .57 | N/A | N/A | 11 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 17.25 | .02 | .95 | .97 | .07 | — | .07 | 18.15 | 5.63 | 14 | 2.16 | 2.16 | .16 | N/A | N/A | 19 | |||||||||||||||||
GROWTH & INCOME FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $13.67 | $.05 | $1.05 | $1.10 | $.05 | $— | $.05 | $14.72 | 8.06 | % | $671 | 1.37 | % | 1.37 | % | .35 | % | N/A | N/A | 34 | % | ||||||||||||
2007 | 14.72 | .08 | 2.37 | 2.45 | .07 | .24 | .31 | 16.86 | 16.78 | 808 | 1.32 | 1.32 | .54 | N/A | N/A | 23 | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | 16.86 | .14 | (3.66 | ) | (3.52 | ) | .11 | .23 | .34 | 13.00 | (21.23 | ) | 623 | 1.35 | 1.35 | .94 | N/A | N/A | 24 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 13.00 | .09 | (1.02 | ) | (.93 | ) | .14 | .02 | .16 | 11.91 | (6.93 | ) | 578 | 1.51 | 1.51 | .90 | N/A | N/A | 26 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 11.91 | .09 | .98 | 1.07 | .07 | — | .07 | 12.91 | 9.01 | 626 | 1.39 | 1.39 | .68 | N/A | N/A | 25 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 13.06 | (.12 | ) | 1.07 | .95 | — | — | — | 14.01 | 7.28 | 72 | 2.07 | 2.07 | (.35 | ) | N/A | N/A | 34 | |||||||||||||||
2007 | 14.01 | (.13 | ) | 2.35 | 2.22 | — | .24 | .24 | 15.99 | 15.98 | 67 | 2.02 | 2.02 | (.16 | ) | N/A | N/A | 23 | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 15.99 | .03 | (3.47 | ) | (3.44 | ) | .02 | .23 | .25 | 12.30 | (21.82 | ) | 41 | 2.05 | 2.05 | .24 | N/A | N/A | 24 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 12.30 | .01 | (.97 | ) | (.96 | ) | .10 | .02 | .12 | 11.22 | (7.59 | ) | 30 | 2.21 | 2.21 | .20 | N/A | N/A | 26 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 11.22 | (.03 | ) | .95 | .92 | — | — | — | 12.14 | 8.23 | 26 | 2.09 | 2.09 | (.02 | ) | N/A | N/A | 25 |
170 | 171 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average Net | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Distributions | Net Asset | Assets** | Waived or Assumed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | in Excess of | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Net Investment | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | ||||||||||||||||||||
of Year | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Income | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in millions) | Credits | Credits(a) | Income (Loss) | Expenses | Income (Loss) | Rate | ||||||||||||||||||
GLOBAL FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $7.06 | $.01 | $ .71 | $ .72 | $.02 | $— | $— | $.02 | $7.76 | 10.15 | % | $260 | 1.77 | % | 1.77 | % | .14 | % | N/A | N/A | 105 | % | |||||||||||||
2007 | 7.76 | — | 1.87 | 1.87 | .05 | .76 | — | .81 | 8.82 | 26.43 | 323 | 1.70 | 1.70 | (.07 | ) | 1.70 | % | (.07 | )% | 134 | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 8.82 | .03 | (1.97 | ) | (1.94 | ) | .01 | 1.12 | — | 1.13 | 5.75 | (25.44 | ) | 249 | 1.70 | 1.70 | .39 | 1.73 | .36 | 133 | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 5.75 | .02 | — | .02 | .02 | — | .02 | .04 | 5.73 | .53 | 249 | 1.90 | 1.90 | .38 | 1.93 | .35 | 141 | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 5.73 | — | .42 | .42 | .01 | — | — | .01 | 6.14 | 7.33 | 269 | 1.72 | 1.72 | .04 | 1.75 | .01 | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 6.52 | (.05 | ) | .67 | .62 | — | — | — | — | 7.14 | 9.51 | 14 | 2.47 | 2.47 | (.56 | ) | N/A | N/A | 105 | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 7.14 | (.16 | ) | 1.81 | 1.65 | .05 | .76 | — | .81 | 7.98 | 25.57 | 14 | 2.40 | 2.40 | (.77 | ) | 2.40 | (.77 | ) | 134 | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 7.98 | (.02 | ) | (1.75 | ) | (1.77 | ) | — | 1.12 | — | 1.12 | 5.09 | (25.91 | ) | 9 | 2.40 | 2.40 | (.31 | ) | 2.43 | (.34 | ) | 133 | ||||||||||||
2009 | 5.09 | (.03 | ) | — | (.03 | ) | .01 | — | .02 | .03 | 5.03 | (.37 | ) | 7 | 2.60 | 2.60 | (.32 | ) | 2.63 | (.35 | ) | 141 | |||||||||||||
2010 | 5.03 | (.06 | ) | .39 | .33 | — | — | — | — | 5.36 | 6.56 | 7 | 2.42 | 2.42 | (.66 | ) | 2.45 | (.69 | ) | 92 | |||||||||||||||
SELECT GROWTH FUND†† | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $8.82 | $(.06 | ) | $ .50 | $ .44 | — | $ — | — | $ — | $9.26 | 4.99 | % | $195 | 1.53 | % | 1.53 | % | (.65 | )% | N/A | N/A | 107 | % | ||||||||||||
2007 | 9.26 | (.04 | ) | 1.75 | 1.71 | — | .76 | — | .76 | 10.21 | 19.81 | 243 | 1.47 | 1.47 | (.46 | ) | N/A | N/A | 169 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | 10.21 | (.04 | ) | (2.06 | ) | (2.10 | ) | — | 1.42 | — | 1.42 | 6.69 | (23.84 | ) | 207 | 1.46 | 1.47 | (.52 | ) | N/A | N/A | 99 | |||||||||||||
2009 | 6.69 | (.02 | ) | (1.34 | ) | (1.36 | ) | — | — | — | — | 5.33 | (20.33 | ) | 170 | 1.67 | 1.67 | (.51 | ) | N/A | N/A | 120 | |||||||||||||
2010 | 5.33 | (.03 | ) | .49 | .46 | — | — | — | — | 5.79 | 8.63 | 184 | 1.56 | 1.56 | (.48 | ) | N/A | N/A | 98 | ||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 8.52 | (.12 | ) | .49 | .37 | — | — | — | — | 8.89 | 4.34 | 23 | 2.23 | 2.23 | (1.35 | ) | N/A | N/A | 107 | ||||||||||||||||
2007 | 8.89 | (.11 | ) | 1.68 | 1.57 | — | .76 | — | .76 | 9.70 | 19.00 | 25 | 2.17 | 2.17 | (1.16 | ) | N/A | N/A | 169 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | 9.70 | (.09 | ) | (1.94 | ) | (2.03 | ) | — | 1.42 | — | 1.42 | 6.25 | (24.43 | ) | 18 | 2.16 | 2.17 | (1.22 | ) | N/A | N/A | 99 | |||||||||||||
2009 | 6.25 | (.06 | ) | (1.25 | ) | (1.31 | ) | — | — | — | — | 4.94 | (20.96 | ) | 10 | 2.37 | 2.37 | (1.21 | ) | N/A | N/A | 120 | |||||||||||||
2010 | 4.94 | (.07 | ) | .46 | .39 | — | — | — | — | 5.33 | 7.90 | 8 | 2.26 | 2.26 | (1.18 | ) | N/A | N/A | 98 |
172 | 173 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average Net | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Year | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in millions) | Credits | Credits(a) | Income (Loss) | Expenses | Income (Loss) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||
OPPORTUNITY FUND††† | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $28.24 | $(.09 | ) | $ .77 | $ .68 | $— | $ .78 | $ .78 | $28.14 | 2.58 | % | $435 | 1.44 | % | 1.44 | % | (.33 | )% | 1.47 | % | (.36 | )% | 55 | % | |||||||||
2007 | 28.14 | .16 | 4.35 | 4.51 | — | 1.33 | 1.33 | 31.32 | 16.57 | 481 | 1.38 | 1.38 | .52 | N/A | N/A | 50 | |||||||||||||||||
2008 | 31.32 | — | (5.53 | ) | (5.53 | ) | .14 | 2.66 | 2.80 | 22.99 | (19.40 | ) | 377 | 1.39 | 1.40 | (.01 | ) | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||
2009 | 22.99 | .01 | (1.61 | ) | (1.60 | ) | — | .63 | .63 | 20.76 | (6.24 | ) | 355 | 1.58 | 1.58 | .09 | N/A | N/A | 35 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 20.76 | .05 | 2.65 | 2.70 | — | — | — | 23.46 | 13.01 | 402 | 1.44 | 1.44 | .24 | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 26.06 | (.29 | ) | .73 | .44 | — | .78 | .78 | 25.72 | 1.85 | 51 | 2.14 | 2.14 | (1.03 | ) | 2.17 | (1.06 | ) | 55 | ||||||||||||||
2007 | 25.72 | (.05 | ) | 3.97 | 3.92 | — | 1.33 | 1.33 | 28.31 | 15.80 | 50 | 2.08 | 2.08 | (.18 | ) | N/A | N/A | 50 | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 28.31 | (.21 | ) | (4.89 | ) | (5.10 | ) | .14 | 2.66 | 2.80 | 20.41 | (19.99 | ) | 32 | 2.09 | 2.10 | (.71 | ) | N/A | N/A | 40 | ||||||||||||
2009 | 20.41 | (.10 | ) | (1.47 | ) | (1.57 | ) | — | .63 | .63 | 18.21 | (6.90 | ) | 23 | 2.28 | 2.28 | (.61 | ) | N/A | N/A | 35 | ||||||||||||
2010 | 18.21 | (.14 | ) | 2.37 | 2.23 | — | — | — | 20.44 | 12.25 | 20 | 2.14 | 2.14 | (.52 | ) | N/A | N/A | 40 | |||||||||||||||
SPECIAL SITUATIONS FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | $20.44 | $.11 | $2.07 | $2.18 | $— | $ — | $ — | $22.62 | 10.67 | % | $249 | 1.53 | % | 1.53 | % | (.49 | )% | 1.73 | % | (.69 | )% | 48 | % | ||||||||||
2007 | 22.62 | (.06 | ) | 3.59 | 3.53 | — | 1.88 | 1.88 | 24.27 | 16.30 | 295 | 1.46 | 1.46 | (.27 | ) | 1.61 | (.42 | ) | 64 | ||||||||||||||
2008 | 24.27 | .03 | (2.93 | ) | (2.90 | ) | — | 1.22 | 1.22 | 20.15 | (12.67 | ) | 258 | 1.49 | 1.50 | .14 | 1.61 | .02 | 52 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 20.15 | .03 | (1.23 | ) | (1.20 | ) | .02 | .53 | .55 | 18.40 | (5.28 | ) | 246 | 1.64 | 1.64 | .22 | 1.82 | .04 | 55 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 18.40 | (.05 | ) | 2.31 | 2.26 | — | — | — | 20.66 | 12.28 | 274 | 1.52 | 1.52 | (.28 | ) | 1.65 | (.41 | ) | 64 | ||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 18.72 | (.26 | ) | 2.11 | 1.85 | — | — | — | 20.57 | 9.88 | 18 | 2.23 | 2.23 | (1.19 | ) | 2.43 | (1.39 | ) | 48 | ||||||||||||||
2007 | 20.57 | (.22 | ) | 3.26 | 3.04 | — | 1.88 | 1.88 | 21.73 | 15.48 | 18 | 2.16 | 2.16 | (.97 | ) | 2.31 | (1.12 | ) | 64 | ||||||||||||||
2008 | 21.73 | (.13 | ) | (2.57 | ) | (2.70 | ) | — | 1.22 | 1.22 | 17.81 | (13.26 | ) | 12 | 2.19 | 2.20 | (.56 | ) | 2.31 | (.68 | ) | 52 | |||||||||||
2009 | 17.81 | (.10 | ) | (1.09 | ) | (1.19 | ) | — | .53 | .53 | 16.09 | (5.99 | ) | 9 | 2.34 | 2.34 | (.48 | ) | 2.52 | (.66 | ) | 55 | |||||||||||
2010 | 16.09 | (.25 | ) | 2.11 | 1.86 | — | — | — | 17.95 | 11.56 | 8 | 2.22 | 2.22 | (.94 | ) | 2.35 | (1.07 | ) | 64 |
174 | 175 |
Financial Highlights (continued)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
P E R S H A R E D A T A | R A T I O S / S U P P L E M E N T A L D A T A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Distributions | Ratio to Average Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment Operations | from | Ratio to Average Net | Assets Before Expenses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset | Net | Net Realized | Net Asset | Assets** | Waived or Assumed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value, | Investment | and Unrealized | Total from | Net | Net | Value, | Net Assets | Net Expenses | Net Expenses | Net | Net | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning | Income | Gain (Loss) on | Investment | Investment | Realized | Total | End of | Total | End of Year | After Fee | Before Fee | Investment | Investment | Turnover | |||||||||||||||||||
of Year | (Loss) | Investments | Operations | Income | Gain | Distributions | Year | Return | * | (in millions) | Credits | Credits(a) | Income (Loss) | Expenses | Income (Loss) | Rate | |||||||||||||||||
INTERNATIONAL FUND | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006(b) | $10.00 | $— | $ .71 | $ .71 | $— | $— | $— | $10.71 | 7.10 | % | $19 | 2.35 | %† | 2.35 | %† | .15 | %† | 5.65 | %† | (3.15 | )%† | 9 | % | ||||||||||
2007 | 10.71 | .08 | 2.46 | 2.54 | — | .07 | .07 | 13.18 | 23.84 | 96 | 2.50 | 2.50 | (.05 | ) | 2.35 | .10 | 67 | ||||||||||||||||
2008 | 13.18 | .07 | (3.45 | ) | (3.38 | ) | — | .32 | .32 | 9.48 | (26.37 | ) | 105 | 1.95 | 1.95 | .20 | 1.94 | .20 | 122 | ||||||||||||||
2009 | 9.48 | .29 | (.74 | ) | (.45 | ) | .13 | — | .13 | 8.90 | (4.52 | ) | 108 | 2.20 | 2.20 | 1.16 | N/A | N/A | 60 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 8.90 | .15 | 1.15 | 1.30 | .02 | — | .02 | 10.18 | 14.63 | 130 | 1.97 | 1.97 | 1.33 | N/A | N/A | 32 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006(b) | 10.00 | (.01 | ) | .71 | .70 | — | — | — | 10.70 | 7.00 | 1 | 3.05 | † | 3.05 | † | (.55 | )† | 6.35 | † | (3.85 | )† | 9 | |||||||||||
2007 | 10.70 | — | 2.44 | 2.44 | — | .07 | .07 | 13.07 | 22.93 | 4 | 3.20 | 3.20 | (.75 | ) | 3.05 | (.60 | ) | 67 | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 13.07 | (.02 | ) | (3.40 | ) | (3.42 | ) | — | .32 | .32 | 9.33 | (26.91 | ) | 4 | 2.65 | 2.65 | (.50 | ) | 2.64 | (.50 | ) | 122 | |||||||||||
2009 | 9.33 | .22 | (.72 | ) | (.50 | ) | .12 | — | .12 | 8.71 | (5.19 | ) | 3 | 2.90 | 2.90 | .46 | N/A | N/A | 60 | ||||||||||||||
2010 | 8.71 | .08 | 1.12 | 1.20 | — | — | — | 9.91 | 13.78 | 4 | 2.67 | 2.67 | .59 | N/A | N/A | 32 |
* | Calculated without sales charges. |
** | Net of expenses waived or assumed by FIMCO (Note 3). |
† | Annualized. |
†† | Prior to May 7, 2007, known as All-Cap Growth Fund. |
††† | Prior to January 31, 2008, known as Mid-Cap Opportunity Fund. |
(a) | The ratios do not include a reduction of expenses from cash balances maintained with the custodian |
or from brokerage service arrangements (Note 1G). | |
(b) | For the Year June 27, 2006 (commencement of operations) to September 30, 2006. |
176 | See notes to financial statements | 177 |
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
First Investors Income Funds and First Investors Equity Funds
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments of the Cash Management Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund and Fund For Income (each a series of First Investors Income Funds), and the Total Return Fund, Value Fund, Blue Chip Fund, Growth & Income Fund, Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund, and International Fund (each a series of First Investors Equity Funds), as of September 30, 2010, the related statements of operations, the statements of changes in net assets, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated thereon. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Funds are not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Funds’ internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of September 30, 2010, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. Where brokers have not replied to our confirmation requests, we have carried out other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
178 |
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Cash Management Fund, Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Fund For Income, Total Return Fund, Value Fund, Blue Chip Fund, Growth & Income Fund, Global Fund, Select Growth Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund and International Fund, as of September 30, 2010, and the results of their operations, changes in their net assets, and their financial highlights for the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Tait, Weller & Baker LLP | |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | |
November 24, 2010 |
179 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Annual Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreements and the
Sub-Advisory Agreement with Muzinich & Co., Inc.
At a meeting held on May 20, 2010 (“May Meeting”), the Board of Trustees (“Board”), including a majority of the non-interested or independent Trustees (hereinafter, “Trustees”), approved the renewal of the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) between First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”) and each of the following funds (each a “Fund” and collectively the “Funds”): Government Fund, Investment Grade Fund, Fund For Income and Cash Management Fund. In addition, at the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the sub-advisory agreement (the “Sub-Advisory Agreement”) with Muzinich & Co., Inc. (“Muzinich”) with respect to the Fund For Income.
In reaching its decisions to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreement for the Fund For Income, the Board considered information furnished and discussed throughout the year at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings as well as information provided specifically in relation to the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement for the May Meeting. Information furnished at Board and/or Committee meetings throughout the year included FIMCO’s analysis of each Fund’s investment performance, presentations given by representatives of FIMCO and Muzinich and various reports on compliance and other services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates. In preparation for the May Meeting, the independent Trustees requested and received information compiled by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, that included, among other things: (1) the inve stment performance over various time periods and the fees and expenses of each Fund as compared to a comparable group of funds as determined by Lipper (“Peer Group”); and (2) comparative information on each Fund’s volatility versus total return. Additionally, in response to specific requests from the independent Trustees in connection with the May Meeting, FIMCO furnished, and the Board considered, information concerning various aspects of its operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates to the Funds, including investment advisory and administrative services to the Funds; (2) the actual management fees paid by each Fund to FIMCO; (3) the costs of providing services to each Fund and the profitability of FIMCO and its affiliate, Administrative Data Management Corp. (“ADM”), the Funds’ affiliated transfer agent, from the relationship with each Fund; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to FIMCO or its affiliates as a result of the relationship with each Fund. FIMCO also provided, and the Board considered, an analysis of the overall profitability of the First Investors
180 |
mutual fund business that included various entities affiliated with FIMCO as well as comparative profitability information based on analysis performed by FIMCO of the financial statements of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers. In addition to evaluating, among other things, the written information provided by FIMCO, the Board also evaluated the answers to questions posed by the Board to representatives of FIMCO.
In addition, in response to specific requests from the independent Trustees in connection with the May Meeting, Muzinich furnished, and the Board reviewed, information concerning various aspects of its operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by Muzinich to the Fund For Income; (2) the sub-advisory fee rates charged by Muzinich and a comparison of those fee rates to the fee rates of Muzinich for providing advisory services to other investment companies or accounts with an investment mandate similar to the Fund For Income; (3) profitability information provided by Muzinich; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to Muzinich as a result of the relationship with the Fund For Income.
In considering the information and materials described above, the independent Trustees received assistance from and met separately with independent legal counsel and were provided with a written description of their statutory responsibilities and the legal standards that are applicable to approvals of advisory agreements. Although the Advisory Agreement for all of the Funds and the Sub-Advisory Agreement for the Fund For Income were considered at the same Board meeting, the Trustees addressed each Fund separately during the May Meeting.
Based on all of the information presented, the Board, including a majority of its independent Trustees, determined on a Fund-by-Fund basis that the fees charged under the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement are reasonable in relation to the services that are provided under each Agreement. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance in reaching its conclusions and determinations with respect to the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreement. Although not meant to be all-inclusive, the following describes some of the factors that were considered by the Board in deciding to approve the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreement with Muzinich.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In examining the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by FIMCO, the Board recognized that FIMCO is dedicated to providing investment management services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund
181 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
complex and that, unlike many other mutual fund managers, FIMCO is not in the business of providing management services to hedge funds, pension funds or separately managed accounts. As a result, the Board considered that FIMCO’s personnel devote substantially all of their time to serving the funds in the First Investors fund complex.
The Board also recognized that it is the philosophy of FIMCO and its affiliates to provide personal service to the shareholders of the Funds, that FIMCO and its affiliates strive to service the needs of a shareholder base that includes many investors who are less affluent and that the average account size of many of the First Investors funds is small by comparison to the industry average account size. The Board also considered management’s explanation regarding the significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders.
The Board noted that FIMCO has undertaken extensive responsibilities as manager of the Funds, including: (1) the provision of investment advice to the Funds; (2) implementing policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with each Fund’s investment objectives and policies; (3) the review of brokerage arrangements; (4) oversight of general portfolio compliance with applicable laws; (5) the provision of certain administrative services to the Funds, including fund accounting; (6) the implementation of Board directives as they relate to the Funds; and (7) evaluating and monitoring any sub-advisers. The Board noted that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but historically has provided certain administrative personnel and services that many other advisers do not provide without imposition of separate fees. The Board also noted the steps that FIMCO has taken to encourage strong performance, including providing significant incentives to portfolio managers and analysts based on Fund performance, and FIMCO’s willingness to make changes in portfolio managers and sub-advisers when necessary to address performance issues. In addition, the Board considered information regarding the overall financial strength of FIMCO and its affiliates and the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided to the Funds in light of the current market environment.
The Board also considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by FIMCO’s affiliates, including transfer agency and distribution services. The Board took into account the fact that ADM is dedicated to providing transfer agency services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex. As a result, ADM can tailor its processes and services to satisfy the needs of the Funds’ shareholder base. The Board noted that the Funds’ shares
182 |
are distributed primarily through First Investors Corporation (“FIC”), which is an affiliate of FIMCO.
Furthermore, the Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the investment management services provided by Muzinich to the Fund For Income. The Board considered Muzinich’s investment management process in managing the Fund For Income and the experience and capability of its personnel responsible for the portfolio management of the Fund For Income. In light of the current market environment, the Board also considered information regarding the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided by Muzinich.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of FIMCO’s and Muzinich’s services, as applicable, as well as the services of FIMCO’s affiliates supported approval of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement.
Investment Performance
The Board placed significant emphasis on the investment performance of each of the Funds. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions held at prior Board or Committee meetings, as applicable, particular attention was given to the performance information compiled by Lipper. In particular, the Trustees reviewed the performance of the Funds over the most recent calendar year (“1-year period”) and the annualized performance over the most recent three calendar year period (“3-year period”) and five calendar year period (“5-year period”). In addition, the Board considered the performance information provided by FIMCO for each Fund through April 30, 2010 (the “year-to-date period”). The Board also reviewed the annual yield of each Fund for each of the past five calendar years. With regard to the performance and yield information, the Board considered the performance and yield of each Fund on a percen tile and quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group. For purposes of the data provided, the first quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the highest performance or yield, as applicable, and the fifth quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the lowest performance or yield.
On a Fund-by-Fund basis, the performance reports indicated, and the Board noted, that the Investment Grade Fund and Cash Management Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for at least one of the performance periods provided by Lipper. With respect to the Fund For Income, the Board considered that Muzinich, which was hired in April 2009, had only approximately one year of history in managing the Fund. The Board also noted that the yield for each Fund, except for the Cash
183 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
Management Fund, for each of the past five calendar years fell within one of the top three quintiles and the yield for the Cash Management Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for four of the past five calendar years. Moreover, the Board considered the volatility versus total return data provided by Lipper as well as FIMCO’s representation that it believes that the Funds use a more conservative investment style than many of their peers.
Fund Expenses, Costs of Services, Economies of Scale and Related Benefits
Management Fees and Expenses. The Board also gave substantial consideration to the fees payable under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement as well as under the Sub-Advisory Agreement for the Fund For Income.
The Board reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s contractual management fee rate (at common asset levels) and actual management fee rate (which included the effect of any fee waivers) as a percentage of average net assets to other funds in its Peer Group. In this regard, the Board considered the contractual and actual management fees of each Fund on a quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group and noted the relative position of each Fund within the Peer Group. The Board also considered that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but also certain administrative personnel to the Funds under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement and that many other advisers do not provide such administrative personnel under their advisory agreements and that FIMCO also provides certain administrative services without the imposition of a separate fee. The Board considered that FIMCO informed the Board that it intends to: (i) extend, on a voluntary basis, the existing t otal expense cap limitation for the Cash Management Fund until May 31, 2011; and (ii) extend, on a voluntary basis, the existing management fee caps for the Fund For Income, Government Fund and Investment Grade Fund until May 31, 2011. The Board also considered that, with respect to the Cash Management Fund, FIMCO was waiving additional management fees to maintain total expense levels below the total expense cap for such Fund due to the low interest rate environment.
In considering the sub-advisory fee rates charged by and costs and profitability of Muzinich with regard to the Fund For Income, the Board noted that FIMCO pays Muzinich a sub-advisory fee from its own advisory fee rather than the Fund paying Muzinich a fee directly. Muzinich provided, and the Board reviewed, information comparing the fees charged by Muzinich for services to the Fund For Income versus the fee rates of Muzinich for providing advisory services to other comparable investment companies or accounts. Based on a review of this information, the Board noted that the fees charged by Muzinich for services to the Fund For Income
184 |
appeared competitive to the fees Muzinich charges to its other comparable investment companies or accounts.
The Board also reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s Class A share total expense ratio, taking into account FIMCO’s expense waivers (as applicable), and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees (i.e., fees other than management, transfer agency and 12b-1/non-12b-1 fees) to other funds in its Peer Group, including on a quintile basis. In considering the level of the total expense ratio and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees, the Board took into account management’s explanation that: (i) there are significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders; (ii) overall Fund expenses cover certain check-writing and wiring privileges for Cash Management Fund shareholders at no additional cost; (iii) the custodial fees for shareholders who invest in the Funds through r etirement accounts are paid by the Funds and are reflected in the Funds’ total expense ratio, and a significant majority of the shares of the Funds, other than the Cash Management Fund, are held in retirement accounts; and (iv) Lipper expense comparisons do not take into account the size of a fund complex, and as a result, in most cases the First Investors funds are compared to funds in complexes that are much larger than First Investors. The Board also noted that Lipper’s customized expense groups tend to be fairly small in number and the funds included in the Peer Group generally change from year to year, thereby introducing an element of randomness that affects comparative results each year. While recognizing the limitations inherent in Lipper’s methodology, the Board believed that the data provided by Lipper was a generally appropriate measure of comparative expenses.
The foregoing comparisons assisted the Trustees by providing them with a basis for evaluating each Fund’s management fee and expense ratio on a relative basis.
Profitability. The Board reviewed the materials it received from FIMCO regarding its revenues and costs in providing investment management and certain administrative services to the Funds. In particular, the Board considered the analysis of FIMCO’s profitability with respect to each Fund, calculated for the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as overall profitability information relating to the past five calendar years. The Board also considered the information provided by FIMCO comparing the profitability of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers as analyzed by FIMCO based on publicly available financial statements. In reviewing the profitability information, the Board also considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO and its affiliates as a result of their relationship with the Funds, which are discussed below. The Board acknowledged that, as a
185 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
business matter, FIMCO was entitled to earn reasonable profits for its services to the Funds. Based on the information provided, the Board also noted that FIMCO operates the Cash Management Fund at a loss.
Economies of Scale. With respect to whether economies of scale are realized by FIMCO as a Fund’s assets increase and the extent to which any economies of scale are reflected in the level of management fee rates charged, the Board considered that the Advisory Agreement fee schedule for each Fund, except the Cash Management Fund, includes breakpoints to account for management economies of scale. The Board noted that the Fund For Income has reached an asset size at which the Fund and its shareholders are benefiting from reduced management fee rates due to breakpoints in its fee schedule. With regard to the Government Fund and Investment Grade Fund, the Board recognized that, although these Funds are not currently at an asset level at which they can take advantage of the breakpoints contained in their fee schedule, each schedule is structured so that when the assets of these Funds increase, economies of scale may be sh ared for the benefit of shareholders. With respect to the Cash Management Fund, the Board concluded that the fee structure is appropriate at current asset levels.
“Fall Out” or Ancillary Benefits. The Board considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO and Muzinich as a result of their relationship with the Funds. The Board considered the profits earned or losses incurred by ADM and the income received by FIC and FIMCO’s affiliated bank as a result of FIMCO’s management of the First Investors funds. The Board also considered the fact that Muzinich does not engage in any soft dollar arrangements.
* * * |
In summary, after evaluation of the comparative performance, fee and expense information and the profitability, ancillary benefits and other considerations as described above, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of services to be provided by FIMCO and Muzinich, the Board concluded that the level of fees paid to FIMCO with respect to each Fund, and Muzinich with respect to the Fund For Income, is reasonable. As a result, the Board, including a majority of the independent Trustees, approved the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreement.
186 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Annual Consideration of the Investment Advisory Agreements and the
Sub-Advisory Agreements with Wellington Management Company, LLP, Paradigm
Capital Management, Inc., Smith Group Asset Management, LP and Vontobel
Asset Management, Inc.
At a meeting held on May 20, 2010 (“May Meeting”), the Board of Trustees (“Board”), including a majority of the non-interested or independent Trustees (hereinafter, “Trustees”), approved the renewal of the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) between First Investors Management Company, Inc. (“FIMCO”) and each of the following funds (each a “Fund” and collectively the “Funds”): Growth & Income Fund, Total Return Fund, Blue Chip Fund, Value Fund, Opportunity Fund, Special Situations Fund, Select Growth Fund, Global Fund and International Fund. In addition, at the May Meeting, the Board, including a majority of the independent Trustees, approved the renewal of the sub-advisory agreements (each a “Sub-Advisory Agreement” and collectively the “Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with: (1) Wellington Management Company, LLP (“WMC”) with respect to the Global Fund; (2) Paradigm Capital Management, Inc. (“Paradigm”) with respect to the Special Situations Fund; (3) Smith Group Asset Management, LP (“Smith Group”) with respect to the Select Growth Fund; and (4) Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. (“Vontobel”) with respect to the International Fund. The Global Fund, Special Situations Fund, Select Growth Fund and International Fund are collectively referred to as the “Sub-Advised Funds.”
In reaching its decisions to approve the continuation of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds, the Board considered information furnished and discussed throughout the year at regularly scheduled Board and Committee meetings as well as information provided specifically in relation to the renewal of the Advisory Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements for the May Meeting. Information furnished at Board and/or Committee meetings throughout the year included FIMCO’s analysis of each Fund’s investment performance, presentations given by representatives of FIMCO, WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel and various reports on compliance and other services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates. In preparation for the May Meeting, the independent Trustees requested and received information compiled by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, that included, among other things: (1) the investment performance over various time periods and the fees and expenses of each Fund as compared to a comparable group of funds as determined by Lipper (“Peer Group”); and (2) comparative information on each Fund’s volatility versus total return. Additionally, in response to specific requests from the independent Trustees in connection with the May Meeting, FIMCO furnished, and
187 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
the Board considered, information concerning various aspects of its operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates to the Funds, including investment advisory and administrative services to the Funds; (2) the actual management fees paid by each Fund to FIMCO; (3) the costs of providing services to each Fund and the profitability of FIMCO and its affiliate, Administrative Data Management Corp. (“ADM”), the Funds’ affiliated transfer agent, from the relationship with each Fund; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to FIMCO or its affiliates as a result of the relationship with each Fund. FIMCO also provided, and the Board considered, an analysis of the overall profitability of the First Investors mutual fund business that included various entities affiliated with FIMCO as well as comparative profitability information based on analysis performed by FIMCO of th e financial statements of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers. In addition to evaluating, among other things, the written information provided by FIMCO, the Board also evaluated the answers to questions posed by the Board to representatives of FIMCO.
In addition, in response to specific requests from the independent Trustees in connection with the May Meeting, WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel furnished, and the Board reviewed, information concerning various aspects of their respective operations, including: (1) the nature, extent and quality of services provided by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (2) the sub-advisory fee rates charged by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel and a comparison of those fee rates to the fee rates of WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel for providing advisory services to other investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable, with an investment mandate similar to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds; (3) profitability information provided by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel; and (4) any “fall out” or ancillary benefits accruing to WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vo ntobel as a result of the relationship with each applicable Sub-Advised Fund.
In considering the information and materials described above, the independent Trustees received assistance from and met separately with independent legal counsel and were provided with a written description of their statutory responsibilities and the legal standards that are applicable to approvals of advisory agreements. Although the Advisory Agreement for all of the Funds and the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds were considered at the same Board meeting, the Trustees addressed each Fund separately during the May Meeting.
188 |
Based on all of the information presented, the Board, including a majority of its independent Trustees, determined on a Fund-by-Fund basis that the fees charged under the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement are reasonable in relation to the services that are provided under each Agreement. The Board did not identify any single factor as being of paramount importance in reaching its conclusions and determinations with respect to the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreements. Although not meant to be all-inclusive, the following describes some of the factors that were considered by the Board in deciding to approve the continuance of the Advisory Agreement for each Fund and Sub-Advisory Agreements with Paradigm, Smith Group, Vontobel and WMC.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In examining the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by FIMCO, the Board recognized that FIMCO is dedicated to providing investment management services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex and that, unlike many other mutual fund managers, FIMCO is not in the business of providing management services to hedge funds, pension funds or separately managed accounts. As a result, the Board considered that FIMCO’s personnel devote substantially all of their time to serving the funds in the First Investors fund complex.
The Board also recognized that it is the philosophy of FIMCO and its affiliates to provide personal service to the shareholders of the Funds, that FIMCO and its affiliates strive to service the needs of a shareholder base that includes many investors who are less affluent and that the average account size of many of the First Investors funds is small by comparison to the industry average account size. The Board also considered management’s explanation regarding the significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders.
The Board noted that FIMCO has undertaken extensive responsibilities as manager of the Funds, including: (1) the provision of investment advice to the Funds; (2) implementing policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with each Fund’s investment objectives and policies; (3) the review of brokerage arrangements; (4) oversight of general portfolio compliance with applicable laws; (5) the provision of certain administrative services to the Funds, including fund accounting; (6) the implementation of Board directives as they relate to the Funds; and (7) evaluating and monitoring any sub-advisers. The Board noted that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but historically has provided certain administrative personnel and services that many other advisers do not provide without imposition of separate fees.
189 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
The Board also noted the steps that FIMCO has taken to encourage strong performance, including providing significant incentives to portfolio managers and analysts based on Fund performance, and FIMCO’s willingness to make changes in portfolio managers and sub-advisers when necessary to address performance issues. In addition, the Board considered information regarding the overall financial strength of FIMCO and its affiliates and the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided to the Funds in light of the current market environment.
The Board also considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by FIMCO’s affiliates, including transfer agency and distribution services. The Board took into account the fact that ADM is dedicated to providing transfer agency services exclusively to the Funds and the other funds in the First Investors fund complex. As a result, ADM can tailor its processes and services to satisfy the needs of the Funds’ shareholder base. The Board noted that the Funds’ shares are distributed primarily through First Investors Corporation (“FIC”), which is an affiliate of FIMCO.
Furthermore, the Board considered the nature, extent and quality of the investment management services provided by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Board considered WMC’s, Paradigm’s, Smith Group’s and Vontobel’s investment management process in managing the applicable Sub-Advised Funds and the experience and capability of their respective personnel responsible for the portfolio management of the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. In light of the current market environment, the Board also considered information regarding the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided by each sub-adviser.
Based on the information considered, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of FIMCO’s, WMC’s, Paradigm’s, Smith Group’s and Vontobel’s services, as applicable, as well as the services of FIMCO’s affiliates supported approval of the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
Investment Performance
The Board placed significant emphasis on the investment performance of each of the Funds. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions held at prior Board or Committee meetings, as applicable, particular attention was given to the performance information compiled by Lipper. In particular, the Board reviewed the performance of the Funds over the most recent calendar year (“1-year period”) and, to the extent provided by Lipper, the annualized performance over
190 |
the most recent three calendar year period (“3-year period”) and five calendar year period (“5-year period”). In addition, the Board considered the performance information provided by FIMCO for each Fund through April 30, 2010 (the “year-to-date period”). With regard to the performance information, the Board considered the performance of each Fund on a percentile and quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group. For purposes of the performance data provided, the first quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the highest performance and the fifth quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the lowest performance.
On a Fund-by-Fund basis, the performance reports indicated, and the Board noted, that each Fund except the Growth & Income Fund and Select Growth Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for at least one of the performance periods provided by Lipper. With regard to the Growth & Income Fund and Select Growth Fund, the Board noted that performance for the year-to-date period had improved significantly and fell within one of the top three quintiles. The Board also considered that the sub-adviser for the Select Growth Fund had been changed in 2007 and did not have a full three years of history managing the Fund. The Board also considered the volatility versus total return data provided by Lipper as well as FIMCO’s representation that it believes that the Funds use a more conservative investment style than many of their peers.
Fund Expenses, Costs of Services, Economies of Scale and Related Benefits
Management Fees and Expenses. The Board also gave substantial consideration to the fees payable under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement as well as under the Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds.
The Board reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s contractual management fee rate (at common asset levels) and actual management fee rate (which included the effect of any fee waivers) as a percentage of average net assets to other funds in its Peer Group. In this regard, the Board considered the contractual and actual management fees of each Fund on a quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group and noted the relative position of each Fund within the Peer Group. The Board also considered that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but also certain administrative personnel to the Funds under each Fund’s Advisory Agreement and that many other advisers do not provide such administrative personnel under their advisory agreements and that FIMCO also provides certain administrative services without the imposition of a separate fee. The Board also considered that FIMCO informed the Board that it intends to extend, on a volun tary basis, the existing management fee caps for the Special Situations Fund and Global Fund until May 31, 2011.
191 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
In considering the sub-advisory fee rates charged by and costs and profitability of WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel with regard to the respective Sub-Advised Funds, the Board noted that FIMCO pays WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group or Vontobel, as the case may be, a sub-advisory fee from its own advisory fee rather than each Fund paying WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group or Vontobel a fee directly. WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel provided, and the Board reviewed, information comparing the fees charged by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel for services to the respective Sub-Advised Funds versus the fee rates of WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel for providing advisory services to other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable. Based on a review of this information, the Board noted that the fees charged by WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel, as the case may be, for services to each ap plicable Sub-Advised Fund appeared competitive to the fees WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel charge to their other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable.
The Board also reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s Class A share total expense ratio, taking into account FIMCO’s expense waivers (as applicable), and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees (i.e., fees other than management, transfer agency and 12b-1/non-12b-1 fees) to other funds in its Peer Group, including on a quintile basis. In considering the level of the total expense ratio and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees, the Board took into account management’s explanation that: (i) the Funds have average account sizes that are relatively small compared with the industry average for equity funds; (ii) there are significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders; (iii) the custodial fees for shareholders who invest in the Funds through retirement account s are paid by the Funds and are reflected in the Funds’ total expense ratio, and a significant majority of the shares of the Funds are held in retirement accounts; and (iv) Lipper expense comparisons do not take into account the size of a fund complex, and as a result, in certain cases the First Investors funds are compared to funds in complexes that are much larger than First Investors. The Board also noted that Lipper’s customized expense groups tend to be fairly small in number and the funds included in the Peer Group generally change from year to year, thereby introducing an element of randomness that affects comparative results each year. While recognizing the limitations inherent in Lipper’s methodology, the Board believed that the data provided by Lipper was a generally appropriate measure of comparative expenses.
192 |
The foregoing comparisons assisted the Trustees by providing them with a basis for evaluating each Fund’s management fee and expense ratio on a relative basis.
Profitability. The Board reviewed the materials it received from FIMCO regarding its revenues and costs in providing investment management and certain administrative services to the Funds. In particular, the Board considered the analysis of FIMCO’s profitability with respect to each Fund, calculated for the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as overall profitability information relating to the past five calendar years. The Board also considered the information provided by FIMCO comparing the profitability of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers as analyzed by FIMCO based on publicly available financial statements. In reviewing the profitability information, the Board also considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO and its affiliates as a result of their relationship with the Funds, which are discussed below. The Board acknowledged that, as a business matter, FIMCO was entitled to earn reasonable profits for its services to the Funds.
Economies of Scale. With respect to whether economies of scale are realized by FIMCO as a Fund’s assets increase and the extent to which any economies of scale are reflected in the level of management fee rates charged, the Board considered that the Advisory Agreement fee schedule for each Fund includes breakpoints to account for management economies of scale. The Board noted that each Fund except for the Select Growth Fund, Global Fund and International Fund have reached an asset size at which the Fund and its shareholders are benefiting from reduced management fee rates due to breakpoints in their respective fee schedules. With regard to the Select Growth Fund, Global Fund and International Fund, the Board recognized that, although these Funds are not currently at an asset level at which they can take advantage of the breakpoints contained in their fee schedule, each schedule is structured so that when the assets of these Funds increase, economies of scale may be shared for the benefit of shareholders.
“Fall Out” or Ancillary Benefits. The Board considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO, WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel as a result of their relationship with the Funds. In that regard, the Board considered the fact that FIMCO, WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel receive research from broker-dealers that execute brokerage transactions for the funds in the First Investors fund complex. However, the Board noted that FIMCO and the sub-advisers must select brokers based on each Fund’s requirements for seeking best execution. The Board also considered that Paradigm executes brokerage transactions for the Special Situations Fund through the use of an affiliated broker-dealer and that this also
193 |
Board Considerations of Advisory Contracts and Fees (continued)
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
provides a source of fall-out benefits to Paradigm. The Board considered the profits earned or losses incurred by ADM and the income received by FIC and FIMCO’s affiliated bank as a result of FIMCO’s management of the First Investors funds.
* * * |
In summary, after evaluation of the comparative performance, fee and expense information and the profitability, ancillary benefits and other considerations as described above, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of services to be provided by FIMCO, WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel, the Board concluded that the level of fees paid to FIMCO with respect to each Fund, and WMC, Paradigm, Smith Group and Vontobel with respect to each applicable Sub-Advised Fund, is reasonable. As a result, the Board, including a majority of the independent Trustees, approved the Advisory Agreement and each Sub-Advisory Agreement.
194 |
Board Considerations of New Advisory Contract and Fees
(unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Approval of a New Advisory Agreement and New Sub-Advisory Agreements
At a meeting held on September 19, 2010 (the “September Meeting”), the Board (the “Equity Board”) of First Investors Equity Funds (the “Equity Funds”) and the Board (the “Income Board” and together the “Boards”) of First Investors Income Funds (the “Income Funds”), including a majority of the non-interested or independent Trustees of each Board, approved a new Advisory Agreement (the “New Agreement”) between FIMCO and each of the Equity Funds and Income Funds, respectively. The Equity Board also approved new Sub-Advisory Agreements (the “New Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with WMC with respect to the Global Fund, Paradigm with respect to the Special Situations Fund, Smith Group with respect to the Select Growth Fund and Vontobel with respect to the International Fund and the Income Board approved a new Sub-Advisory Agreement (together, the “New Sub-Advisory Agreements”) wit h Muzinich with respect to the Fund For Income.
The Boards approved the New Advisory Agreement, and New Sub-Advisory Agreements for the Sub-Advised Funds, due to the pending acquisition (the “Transaction”) of First Investors Consolidated Corporation (“FICC”), the parent company of FIMCO, by The Independent Order of Foresters (“Foresters”). The change in control of FIMCO caused by the Transaction is deemed to be an “assignment” under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) of each Fund's existing Advisory Agreement (the “Existing Agreement”) with FIMCO. As required by the 1940 Act, each Fund's Existing Agreement provides for its automatic termination in the event of an assignment and, thus, each Existing Agreement will terminate upon the closing (the “Closing”) of the Transaction.
Each Board also approved an interim advisory agreement (the “Interim Agreement”) with FIMCO with respect to each Fund in the event that the closing of the Transaction was scheduled to occur prior to approval of the New Agreement by the shareholders of one or more Funds, and an interim Sub-Advisory Agreement (the “Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements”) with respect to its Sub-Advised Funds. The shareholders of the Funds have approved the New Agreement and, therefore, the Interim Agreement and Interim Sub-Advisory Agreements will not become effective.
In connection with their approval of the New Agreement and the Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Independent Trustees received advice from their legal counsel detailing the Boards’ responsibilities pertaining to such approvals. The Boards reviewed the materials furnished by Foresters and FIMCO, including responses to certain questions relating to the Transaction and reports relating to each Fund’s performance, advisory fees and total operating expenses, and other relevant data. Information provided by Foresters and FIMCO for the Boards’ consideration included Foresters’ responses to questions
195 |
Board Considerations of New Advisory Contract and Fees
(continued) (unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
relating to the terms of the Transaction, how Foresters will finance the Transaction, the effect of the Transaction on the Funds, their service providers or fee structure, and any significant changes (actual or anticipated) to the composition of the Boards, Trust officers, operations of the Funds, FIMCO’s investment personnel, FIMCO’s compensation structure, the Existing Agreement, or the Funds’ distribution arrangements. In addition, information on the Funds’ investment performance is regularly provided to the Boards. The Boards also reviewed current and pro forma balance sheets for FIMCO and FIC, the underwriter for the Equity Funds and the Income Funds. Information furnished at Board meetings throughout the year included FIMCO’s analysis of each Fund’s investment performance, presentations given by the portfolio managers of the Funds and various reports on compliance and other services provided by FIMCO and its affiliates.
In considering the information and materials described above, the Independent Trustees received assistance from and met separately with independent legal counsel and were provided with a written description of their statutory responsibilities and the legal standards that are applicable to approvals of advisory agreements. Although the New Agreement and Sub-Advisory Agreements for all of the Funds were considered at the same Board meeting, the Trustees addressed each Fund separately.
The Boards did not identify any single factor or group of factors as being of paramount importance in reaching their conclusions and determinations with respect to the approval of the New Agreement or, for the Sub-Advised Funds, the Sub-Advisory Agreements. Although not meant to be all-inclusive, included below is a description of certain of the factors that were considered by each Board in deciding to approve the New Agreement and, for its Sub-Advised Funds, the Sub-Advisory Agreements.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In examining the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided by FIMCO under the New Advisory Agreement and to be provided by the subadvisers to the Sub-Advised Funds under the New Sub-Advisory Agreements, the Boards considered that the terms of the New Agreement are substantially the same as the terms of the Existing Agreement and the terms of the New Sub-Advisory Agreements are substantially the same as the terms of their respective Existing Sub-Advisory Agreements. The Boards also considered that the Transaction is expected to have minimal impact on FIMCO’s day-to-day operations and is not expected to result in any change in the structure or operations of the Funds. The Boards noted that Foresters currently does not intend to implement any changes to the core services provided to the Funds by FIMCO or its affiliates. The Boards also noted that Foresters currently intends to retain the key personnel employed by FIMCO who provide services to the Funds (other than two senior officers who indicated their intent to retire from FIMCO). The
196 |
same people who manage the Funds are expected to do so after the Closing and the subadvisers that manage the Sub-Advised Funds are expected to continue to manage those Funds after the Closing. The level of service and the manner in which each Fund’s assets are managed are expected to remain the same. The Boards also considered that Foresters does not currently contemplate modifying the Funds’ current service provider relationships.
In evaluating Foresters, the Boards considered the history, reputation, qualification and background of Foresters, the qualifications of its personnel and Foresters financial condition. The Boards also considered Foresters capabilities, experience, corporate structure and capital resources, as well as Foresters long-term business goals with regard to FIMCO and the Funds.
The Boards gave substantial consideration to their evaluation of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by FIMCO under the Existing Agreement and provided by the subadvisers under the Existing Sub-Advisory Agreements at the May Meeting. The Boards recognized that FIMCO is dedicated to providing investment management services exclusively to the Funds and that, unlike many other mutual fund managers, FIMCO is not in the business of providing management services to hedge funds, pension funds or separately managed accounts. As a result, the Boards considered that FIMCO’s personnel devote substantially all of their time to serving the Funds.
The Boards also recognized that it is the philosophy of FIMCO and its affiliates to provide personal service to the shareholders of the Funds, that FIMCO and its affiliates strive to service the needs of a shareholder base that includes many investors who are less affluent and that the average account size of many of the Funds is small by comparison to the industry average account size. The Boards also considered management’s explanation regarding the significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to its shareholders.
The Boards noted that FIMCO has undertaken extensive responsibilities as manager of the Funds, including: (1) the provision of investment advice to the Funds; (2) the implementation of policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with each Fund’s investment objectives and policies; (3) the review of brokerage arrangements; (4) oversight of general portfolio compliance with applicable laws; (5) the provision of certain administrative services to the Funds, including Fund accounting; (6) the implementation of Board directives as they relate to the Funds; and (7) the evaluation and monitoring of subadvisers. The Boards noted that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but historically has provided certain administrative personnel and services that many other advisers do not provide without imposition of separate fees.
197 |
Board Considerations of New Advisory Contract and Fees
(continued) (unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
The Boards also noted the steps that FIMCO has taken to encourage strong performance, including providing significant incentives to portfolio managers and analysts based on Fund performance, and FIMCO’s willingness to make changes in portfolio managers and subadvisers when necessary to address performance issues. In addition, the Boards considered information regarding the overall financial strength of FIMCO and its affiliates and the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided to the Funds in light of the current market environment.
The Boards also considered the nature, extent and quality of the services provided to the Funds by FIMCO’s affiliates, including transfer agency and distribution services. The Boards took into account the fact that ADM is dedicated to providing transfer agency services exclusively to the Funds. As a result, ADM can tailor its processes and services to satisfy the needs of the Funds’ shareholder base. The Boards noted that the Funds’ shares are distributed primarily through FIC, which is an affiliate of FIMCO.
The Boards also considered the nature, extent and quality of the investment management services provided by Paradigm, Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel and WMC to the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. The Boards considered Paradigm’s, Muzinich’s, Smith Group’s, Vontobel’s and WMC’s investment management process in managing the applicable Sub-Advised Funds and the experience and capability of their respective personnel responsible for the portfolio management of the applicable Sub-Advised Funds. In light of the current market environment, the Boards also considered information regarding the resources and staffing in place with respect to the services provided by each subadviser.
Based on the information considered, the Boards concluded that the nature, extent and quality of FIMCO’s, Paradigm’s, Muzinich’s, Smith Group’s, Vontobel’s and WMC’s services, as well as the services of FIMCO’s affiliates, supported approval of the New Agreement and the New Sub-Advisory Agreements.
Investment Performance
While the Boards considered more recent performance information, each Board placed significant emphasis on consideration of the investment performance of each of the Funds at the May Meeting. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions held at prior and subsequent Board or Committee meetings, as applicable, particular attention was given to the performance information compiled by Lipper. In particular, the Boards reviewed the performance of the Funds over the most recent calendar year and, to the extent provided by Lipper, the annualized performance over the most recent three calendar year period and five calendar year periods as compared to a comparable group of funds as determined by Lipper (“Peer Group”). In addition, the Boards considered the performance information provided by FIMCO for each Fund through April 30, 2010 (the “year-to-date period”). As
198 |
applicable, the Boards also reviewed the annual yield of each Fund for each of the past five calendar years on an absolute and comparative basis. With regard to the performance information, the Boards considered the performance and/or yield, as applicable, of each Fund on a percentile and quintile basis as compared to its Peer Group. For purposes of the data provided, the first quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the highest performance or yield, as applicable, and the fifth quintile is defined as 20% of the funds in the applicable Peer Group with the lowest performance or yield. For each Fund, the Boards also considered the volatility versus total return data provided by Lipper as well as FIMCO’s representation that it believes that the Funds use a more conservative investment style than many of their peers. The Equity Board also took note of the improved performance of the Select Growth Fund reviewed at the Board ’s August 2010 meeting.
For the Equity Funds, on a fund-by-fund basis, the performance reports indicated, and the Equity Board noted, that each Fund except the Growth & Income Fund and Select Growth Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for at least one of the performance periods provided by Lipper. With regard to the Growth & Income Fund and Select Growth Fund, the Equity Board noted that performance for the year-to-date period had improved significantly and fell within one of the top three quintiles. The Equity Board also considered that the subadviser for the Select Growth Fund had been changed in 2007 and did not have a full three years of history managing the Fund.
For the Income Funds, on a fund-by-fund basis, the performance reports indicated, and the Income Board noted, that the Investment Grade Fund and Cash Management Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for at least one of the performance periods provided by Lipper. With respect to the Fund For Income, the Income Board considered that Muzinich, which was hired in April 2009, had only approximately one year of history in managing the Fund. The Income Board also noted that the yield for each Fund, except for the Cash Management Fund, for each of the past five calendar years fell within one of the top three quintiles and the yield for the Cash Management Fund fell within one of the top three quintiles for four of the past five calendar years.
Fund Expenses, Costs of Services, Economies of Scale and Related Benefits
Management Fees, Subadvisory Fees and Expenses. The Boards noted that the advisory fees payable by each Fund under the New Agreement are the same as the fee rates payable under the Existing Agreement. Each Board gave substantial consideration to its evaluation of the advisory fees payable by the Funds and each Fund’s total expense ratio at the May Meeting. The Boards considered that the Funds’ expense ratios were not expected to increase as a result of the Transaction. The Boards also
199 |
Board Considerations of New Advisory Contract and Fees
(continued) (unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
considered that Foresters currently does not intend to change any Fund’s expense reimbursement or advisory fee waiver arrangements. In addition, the Boards noted that shareholders would not bear any costs in connection with the Transaction, inasmuch as FICC and Foresters will bear the costs, fees and expenses incurred by the Funds in connection with the proxy statement, the fees and expenses of accountants and attorneys relating to the Transaction and proxy statement, and any other fees and expenses incurred by the Funds in connection with the Transaction.
At the May Meeting, the Boards reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing each Fund’s contractual management fee rate (at common asset levels) and actual management fee rate (which included the effect of any fee waivers) as a percentage of average net assets to a customized group of comparable funds within its Peer Group selected by Lipper (“Expense Group”). In this regard, the Boards considered the contractual and actual management fees of each Fund on a quintile basis as compared to its Expense Group and noted the relative position of each fund within the Expense Group.
The Boards also considered that FIMCO provides not only advisory services but also certain administrative personnel to the Funds under each Fund’s advisory agreement and that many other advisers do not provide such administrative personnel under their advisory agreements and that FIMCO also provides certain administrative services without the imposition of a separate fee.
The Boards considered that, at the May Meeting, FIMCO had extended, and, thereafter, Foresters agreed to keep in place, the existing voluntary: (1) total expense cap limitations for the Cash Management Fund; and (2) the management fee caps for the Special Situations Fund, Global Fund, Fund For Income, Government Fund and Investment Grade Fund until May 31, 2011. In addition, the Income Board considered that, with respect to the Cash Management Fund, FIMCO is currently waiving additional management fees to maintain total expense levels below the total expense cap for the Fund due to the low interest rate environment.
In considering the subadvisory fee rates charged by and costs and profitability of Paradigm, Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel and WMC with regard to their respective Sub-Advised Funds, the Boards noted that FIMCO pays Paradigm, Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel or WMC, as the case may be, a subadvisory fee from its own advisory fee rather than each Fund paying Paradigm, Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel or WMC a fee directly. At the May meeting, Paradigm, Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel and WMC provided, and the Boards reviewed, information comparing the fees charged by Paradigm, Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel and WMC for services to the respective Sub-Advised Funds versus the fee rates of Paradigm,
200 |
Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel and WMC for providing advisory services to other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable. Based on a review of this information, the Boards noted that the fees charged by Paradigm, Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel and WMC for services to each applicable Sub-Advised Fund appeared competitive to the fees Paradigm, Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel and WMC charge to their other comparable investment companies or accounts or compared to their standard fee schedule, as applicable.
At the May Meeting, the Boards also reviewed the information compiled by Lipper comparing the Class A share total expense ratio of each of the Equity Funds and Income Funds, taking into account FIMCO’s expense waivers (as applicable), and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees (i.e., fees other than management, transfer agency and 12b-1/non-12b-1 fees) to other funds in its Expense Group, including on a quintile basis, for all Funds.
In considering the level of the total expense ratio and the ratio of the sum of actual management and other non-management fees, the Boards took into account management’s explanation that: (i) the Equity Funds have average account sizes that are relatively small compared with the industry average for equity funds; (ii) there are significant costs involved in providing the level of personal service that the First Investors fund complex seeks to deliver to shareholders of the Funds; (iii) overall Fund expenses cover certain check-writing and wiring privileges for the Cash Management Fund shareholders at no additional cost; (iv) the custodial fees for shareholders who invest in the Funds through retirement accounts are paid by the Funds and are reflected in the Funds’ total expense ratio, and a significant majority of the shares of the Funds (other than Cash Management Fund) are held in retirement accounts; and (v) Lipper expense comparisons do not t ake into account the size of a fund complex, and as a result, in certain cases the Funds are compared to funds in complexes that are much larger than First Investors. The Boards also noted that the Expense Groups tend to be fairly small in number and the funds included in the Peer Group generally change from year to year, thereby introducing an element of randomness that affects comparative results each year. While recognizing the limitations inherent in Lipper’s methodology, the Boards believed that the data provided by Lipper was a generally appropriate measure of comparative expenses.
The foregoing comparisons assisted the Trustees by providing them with a basis for evaluating each Fund’s management fee and expense ratio and, for the Sub-Advised Funds, the subadvisory fee, on a relative basis. Based on the information considered, the Trustees concluded that each Fund’s advisory fees and expense ratio and, for the Sub-Advised Funds, the subadvisory fee, relative to comparable mutual funds was
201 |
Board Considerations of New Advisory Contract and Fees
(continued) (unaudited)
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
reasonable given the nature, extent and quality of the services to be provided under the New Agreement and, for the Sub-Advised Funds, the New Sub-Advisory Agreements.
Profitability. At the September Meeting, the Boards reviewed the materials they received regarding Foresters capital resources. The Boards also reviewed the materials provided by FIMCO at the May Meeting regarding its revenues and costs in providing investment management and certain administrative services to the Funds. In particular, the Boards considered the analysis of FIMCO’s profitability with respect to each Fund, calculated for the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as overall profitability information relating to the past five calendar years. The Boards also considered the information provided by FIMCO comparing the profitability of certain publicly-traded mutual fund asset managers as analyzed by FIMCO based on publicly available financial statements. In reviewing the profitability information, the Boards also considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO and its affiliates as a result of t heir relationship with the Funds, which are discussed below. The Boards acknowledged that, as a business matter, FIMCO was entitled to earn reasonable profits for its services to the Funds. Based on the information provided, the Income Board also noted that FIMCO currently operates the Cash Management Fund at a loss.
Economies of Scale. With respect to economies of scale, the Boards considered that the Transaction could provide certain benefits to the Funds, including opportunities to increase the distribution of Fund shares and realize cost savings by leveraging certain available resources at Foresters. The Boards considered that any resulting growth of Fund assets might produce economies of scale that could benefit Fund shareholders. The Boards also considered that the fee schedules for each Fund, other than the Cash Management Fund, which will remain the same under the New Agreement, include breakpoints to account for management economies of scale.
The Boards also placed significant emphasis on their consideration at the May Meeting of whether economies of scale are benefiting the Funds based on breakpoints in each Fund’s fee schedule (as applicable), which are discussed below.
With respect to the Equity Funds, the Equity Board noted that each Fund, except for the Select Growth Fund, Global Fund and International Fund, has reached an asset size at which the Fund and its shareholders are benefiting from reduced management fee rates due to breakpoints in their respective fee schedules. With regard to the Select Growth Fund, Global Fund and International Fund, the Equity Board recognized that, although these Funds are not currently at an asset level at which they can take advantage of the breakpoints contained in their fee schedule, each schedule is structured so that when the assets of these Funds increase, economies of scale may be shared for the benefit of shareholders.
202 |
With respect to the Income Funds, the Income Board noted that the Fund For Income has reached an asset size at which the Fund and its shareholders are benefiting from reduced management fee rates due to breakpoints in its fee schedule. With regard to the Government Fund and Investment Grade Fund, the Income Board recognized that, although these Funds are not currently at an asset level at which they can take advantage of the breakpoints contained in their fee schedule, each schedule is structured so that when the assets of these Funds increase, economies of scale may be shared for the benefit of shareholders. With respect to the Cash Management Fund, the Income Board concluded that the fee structure is appropriate at current asset levels.
“Fall Out” or Ancillary Benefits. The Boards considered the “fall-out” or ancillary benefits that may accrue to FIMCO, Paradigm, Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel, WMC and Foresters as a result of their relationships with the Funds. In that regard, the Boards considered that the Funds may offer Foresters the opportunity to promote its fraternal mission by offering Foresters membership to existing shareholders. The Boards noted that, at the May Meeting, the Boards had considered the benefits that may accrue to FIMCO, Paradigm, Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel and WMC. The Boards considered that FIMCO, Paradigm, Smith Group, Vontobel, and WMC receive research from broker-dealers that execute brokerage transactions for the Funds. The Boards noted that FIMCO and these four subadvisers must select brokers based on each Fund’s requirements for seeking best execution. The Equity Board also considered that Paradigm executes brokerage transactions for the Special Situations Fund through the use of an affiliated broker-dealer and that this also provides a source of fall-out benefits to Paradigm. The Income Board also considered the fact that Muzinich does not engage in any soft dollar arrangements. The Boards also considered the profits earned or losses incurred by ADM, the income received by FIC, and FIMCO’s affiliated bank as a result of FIMCO’s management of the Funds.
* * * |
In summary, after evaluation of the comparative performance, fee and expense information and the profitability, ancillary benefits and other considerations as described above, the Boards concluded that the level of fees to be paid to FIMCO with respect to each Fund and to Paradigm, Muzinich, Smith Group, Vontobel and WMC with respect to each Sub-Advised Fund is reasonable. As a result, the Boards, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, approved the New Agreement and, for the Sub-Advised Funds, the New Sub-Advisory Agreements.
203 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Trustees and Officers*
Position(s) | ||||
Held with | Principal | |||
Funds and | Occupation(s) | |||
Length of | During Past | |||
Service | 5 Years | |||
(Including | and Other | Number of | Other | |
with | Directorships | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Predecessor | held by | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address** | Funds) | Trustee | Overseen | Held |
DISINTERESTED TRUSTEES | ||||
Charles R. Barton, III 1965 | Trustee since | Chief Operating | 39 | None |
1/1/06 | Officer (since | |||
2007), Board | ||||
Director (since | ||||
1989) and Trustee | ||||
of the Barton | ||||
Group/Barton | ||||
Mines Corpora- | ||||
tion (mining | ||||
and industrial | ||||
abrasives distri- | ||||
bution); President | ||||
of Noe Pierson | ||||
Corporation (land | ||||
holding and man- | ||||
agement services | ||||
provider) (since | ||||
2004) | ||||
Stefan L. Geiringer 1934 | Trustee since | President of SLG | 39 | None |
1/1/06 | Energy LLC | |||
(since 2010); | ||||
Co-Founder | ||||
and Senior Vice | ||||
President of Real | ||||
Time Energy | ||||
Solutions, Inc. | ||||
(energy consult- | ||||
ing) (since | ||||
2005); President | ||||
of SLG Energy, | ||||
Inc. (since 2005); | ||||
Founder/Owner | ||||
and President of | ||||
North Atlantic | ||||
Utilities, Inc. | ||||
(since 1987) |
204 |
Position(s) | ||||
Held with | Principal | |||
Funds and | Occupation(s) | |||
Length of | During Past | |||
Service | 5 Years | |||
(Including | and Other | Number of | Other | |
with | Directorships | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Predecessor | held by | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address** | Funds) | Trustee | Overseen | Held |
DISINTERESTED TRUSTEES (continued) | ||||
Robert M. Grohol 1932 | Trustee since | None/Retired | 39 | None |
6/30/00 and | ||||
Chairman since | ||||
1/1/10 | ||||
Arthur M. Scutro, Jr. 1941 | Trustee since | None/Retired | 39 | None |
1/1/06 | ||||
Mark R. Ward 1952 | Trustee since | Self-employed, | 39 | None |
1/1/10 | consultant | |||
(since 2008); | ||||
Senior Partner, | ||||
Ernst & Young, | ||||
LLP, Leader, | ||||
Mid-Atlantic | ||||
Asset Manage- | ||||
ment Practice | ||||
(2003–2007) |
205 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Trustees and Officers* (continued)
Position(s) | ||||
Held with | Principal | |||
Funds and | Occupation(s) | |||
Length of | During Past | |||
Service | 5 Years | |||
(Including | and Other | Number of | Other | |
with | Directorships | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Predecessor | held by | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address** | Funds) | Trustee | Overseen | Held |
INTERESTED TRUSTEES*** | ||||
Kathryn S. Head 1955 | Trustee since | Chairman, Presi- | 39 | None |
c/o First Investors | 3/17/94 and | dent and Director | ||
Management Company, Inc. | President since | of First Investors | ||
Raritan Plaza I | 2001 | Consolidated | ||
Edison, NJ 08837 | Corporation, First | |||
Investors Manage- | ||||
ment Company, | ||||
Inc., Administra- | ||||
tive Data Manage- | ||||
ment Corp., | ||||
N.A.K. Realty | ||||
Corporation, Real | ||||
Property Develop- | ||||
ment Corporation | ||||
and Route 33 Re- | ||||
alty Corporation; | ||||
and Chairman and | ||||
Director of First | ||||
Investors Corpora- | ||||
tion, First Inves- | ||||
tors Federal Sav- | ||||
ings Bank, First | ||||
Investors Life | ||||
Insurance Com- | ||||
pany and First | ||||
Investors Credit | ||||
Corporation.** |
* | Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term with the Funds, until his/her successor is elected. |
*** | Ms. Head is an interested trustee because (a) she indirectly owns more than 5% of the voting stock of |
the adviser and principal underwriter of the Funds, (b) she is an officer, director and employee of the | |
adviser and principal underwriter of the Funds, and (c) she is an officer of the Funds. |
206 |
Position(s) | ||||
Held with | Principal | |||
Funds and | Occupation(s) | |||
Length of | During Past | |||
Service | 5 Years | |||
(Including | and Other | Number of | Other | |
with | Directorships | Portfolios in | Trusteeships/ | |
Name, Year of Birth | Predecessor | held by | Fund Complex | Directorships |
and Address** | Funds) | Trustee | Overseen | Held |
OFFICER (S) WHO ARE NOT TRUSTEES | ||||
Joseph I. Benedek 1957 | Treasurer | Treasurer of | 39 | None |
c/o First Investors | since 1988 | First Investors | ||
Management Company, Inc. | Management | |||
Raritan Plaza I | Company, Inc. | |||
Edison, NJ 08837 | ||||
Larry R. Lavoie**** 1947 | Chief | General Counsel | 39 | None |
Compliance | of First Investors | |||
Officer, 8/20/04 | Corporation and | |||
to 6/2/08 and | its affiliates; | |||
since 6/19/08 | Director of | |||
First Investors | ||||
Consolidated | ||||
Corporation | ||||
and various | ||||
affiliates |
** | The address of each Trustee and officer listed above is c/o First Investors Legal Department, 110 Wall |
Street, New York, NY 10005 unless specified otherwise. | |
**** | Mr. Lavoie served as Chief Compliance Officer through November 21, 2010. Mr. Marc S. Milgram |
was appointed the Chief Compliance Officer effective November 22, 2010. |
207 |
FIRST INVESTORS INCOME FUNDS
FIRST INVESTORS EQUITY FUNDS
Shareholder Information | |
_______________________________________ | |
Investment Adviser | Underwriter |
First Investors Management | First Investors Corporation |
Company, Inc. | 110 Wall Street |
110 Wall Street | New York, NY 10005 |
New York, NY 10005 | |
Subadviser | Custodian |
(Fund For Income) | (Income Funds) |
Muzinich & Co., Inc. | The Bank of New York Mellon |
450 Park Avenue | One Wall Street |
New York, NY 10022 | New York, NY 10286 |
Subadviser | |
(Global Fund) | Custodian |
Wellington Management Company, LLP | (Equity Funds) |
75 State Street | Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. |
Boston, MA 02109 | 40 Water Street |
Boston, MA 02109 | |
Subadviser | |
(Select Growth Fund) | Transfer Agent |
Smith Asset Management Group, L.P. | Administrative Data Management Corp. |
100 Crescent Court | Raritan Plaza I – 8th Floor |
Dallas, TX 75201 | Edison, NJ 08837-3620 |
Subadviser | |
(Special Situations Fund) | Independent Registered Public |
Paradigm Capital Management, Inc. | Accounting Firm |
Nine Elk Street | Tait, Weller & Baker LLP |
Albany, NY 12207 | 1818 Market Street |
Philadelphia, PA 19103 | |
Subadviser | |
(International Fund) | Legal Counsel |
Vontobel Asset Management, Inc. | K&L Gates LLP |
1540 Broadway | 1601 K Street, N.W. |
New York, NY 10036 | Washington, DC 20006 |
208 |
A description of the policies and procedures that the Funds use to vote proxies relating to a portfolio’s securities is available, without charge, upon request by calling toll free 1-800-423-4026 or can be viewed online or downloaded from the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) internet website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, information regarding how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, is available, without charge, upon request in writing or by calling 1-800-423-4026 and on the SEC’s internet website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Funds file their complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC on Form N-Q, for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Funds’ Form N-Q is available on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov; and may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330. The schedule of portfolio holdings is available, without charge, upon request in writing or by calling 1-800-423-4026.
209 |
NOTES
210 |
NOTES
211 |
NOTES
212 |
NOTES
213 |
NOTES
214 |
NOTES
215 |
NOTES
216 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics
As of September 30, 2010, the Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer.
For the year ended September 30, 2010, there were no waivers granted from a provision of the code of ethics.
A copy of the Registrant's code of ethics is filed under Item 12(a)(1).
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
During the reporting period the Registrant's Board determined that it had at least one "audit committee financial expert" serving on its audit committee. Arthur M. Scutro, Jr. was the "audit committee financial expert" during the period and was considered to be "independent" as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services | ||||||||
Fiscal Year Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
----------------- | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
---- | ---- | |||||||
(a) Audit Fees | ||||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $104,100 | $104,100 | ||||||
(b) Audit-Related Fees | ||||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ 0 | $ 0 | ||||||
(c) Tax Fees | ||||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $16,600 | $15,750 | ||||||
Nature of fees: tax returns preparation and tax compliance | ||||||||
(d) All Other Fees | ||||||||
First Investors Income Funds | $ 0 | $ 0 |
(e)(1) Audit committee's pre-approval policies
The Charter of the Audit Committee requires the Audit Committee (a) to pre-approve, and to recommend to the full Board, the selection, retention or termination of the independent auditors to provide audit, review or attest services to the First Investors Funds (“Funds”) and, in connection therewith, evaluate the independence of the auditors and to obtain the auditors’ specific
representations as to their independence; (b) to pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided to the Funds by the independent auditor; and (c) to pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided by the Funds’ independent auditor to the Funds’ investment adviser or to any entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the Funds’ investment adviser and that provides ongoing services to the Funds, if the engagement relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds. The Audit Committee has not adopted pre-approval policies or procedures to permit the services in (b) and (c) above to be pre-approved by other means.
(e)(2) None, or 0%, of the services relating to the Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees paid by the Registrant and Related Entities disclosed above were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (which permits audit committee approval after the start of the engagement with respect to services other than audit review or attest services, if certain conditions are satisfied).
(f) Not Applicable
(g) Aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Registrant's accountant for services rendered to the Registrant and the Registrant's investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant for the two fiscal years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were $77,900 and $82,100, respectively.
(h) Not Applicable
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Schedule is included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of this Form.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies & Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not applicable
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers
Not applicable
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There were no material changes to the procedure by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the Registrant's Board of Trustees.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Registrant's Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) are effective, based on their evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) There were no changes in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
(a)(1) Code of Ethics - Filed herewith
(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Filed herewith
(b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 - Filed herewith
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
First Investors Income Funds | ||
By | /S/ | KATHRYN S. HEAD |
Kathryn S. Head | ||
President and Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date: | December 9, 2010 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| ||
First Investors Income Funds | ||
| ||
By | /S/ | KATHRYN S. HEAD |
Kathryn S. Head | ||
President and Principal Executive Officer | ||
By | /S/ | JOSEPH I. BENEDEK |
Joseph I. Benedek | ||
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer | ||
Date: | December 9, 2010 |