UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-04015
Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust
(Exact Name of registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place Boston, MA 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place Boston, MA 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(registrant’s Telephone Number)
October 31
Date of Fiscal Year End
October 31, 2009
Date of Reporting Period
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
Annual Report October 31, 2009 EATON VANCE TAX-MANAGED EQUITY ASSET ALLOCATION FUND |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/ broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
Duncan W. Richardson, CFA
Portfolio Manager
• | | Although global equity markets began the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, on a downward trajectory, stocks bounced strongly off the bottom set in early March and staged a broad-based rally that continued through the end of the 12-month period. Last fall, on the verge of a possible collapse of the global financial system, risk-averse investors reacted by streaming to the sidelines, sending stocks into a dramatic decline. By late winter, however, fiscal and monetary interventions by governments around the world began to fuel optimism that the financial crisis would end and global economic growth might resume. |
• | | Amid prospects for a better-than-expected 2009, investor risk appetite began to return, overcoming such lingering concerns as high consumer debt levels, rising unemployment and still-depressed home prices. Corporate profits also started showing improvement, benefiting from cost-cutting and easier earnings comparisons, which further supported the equity market’s rebound. Stocks that declined the most last fall, especially those lower-quality, cyclical issues farther out on the risk spectrum, tended to be those that recovered most quickly as the rally gained steam. |
|
• | | From March through September 2009, the broad-based S&P 500 Index posted strong gains, with only a slight pull back in October ending a string of consecutive monthly gains. For the full one-year period that ended October 31, 2009, the S&P 500 posted a 9.80% return, while the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 7.76% and the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index soared 18.84%. The large-cap Russell 1000 Index returned 11.20%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index gained 6.46%. In terms of investment styles, growth stocks widely outperformed their counterparts in the value space.1 |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
• | | The Fund’s2 Class A shares outperformed the Russell 3000 Index (the Index) for the year ending October 31, 2009. While the Fund’s short-term standing (for Class A shares) within its Lipper peer category was disappointing for the volatile one-year period, its stronger longer-term record remained intact (as illustrated by the table on page 2). |
|
• | | The Fund invests in seven underlying Tax-Managed Portfolios. As such, its return is a reflection of the Portfolios’ performance, as well as its allocation among these Portfolios. In April 2009, management made two changes to the Fund’s target allocations. Relative to the Fund’s allocation at October 31, 2008, the new targets reflected an increase of approximately 1% each to Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio and Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio, and a subsequent decrease of approximately 2% from Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio. The increased small-cap exposure benefited returns, as each of the two Portfolios significantly outpaced their respective benchmarks. |
|
• | | Relative to the Index, which has no exposure to international stocks, the Fund also benefited from its investment in the underlying international portfolio. International stocks, as measured by the |
Total Return Performance
10/31/08 - 10/31/09
| | | | |
Class A3 | | | 10.98 | % |
Class B3 | | | 10.14 | |
Class C3 | | | 10.18 | |
Russell 3000 Index1 | | | 10.83 | |
Lipper Multi-Cap Core Funds Average1 | | | 15.09 | |
See pages 3 and 4 for more performance information, including after-tax returns.
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
2 | | The Fund currently invests all of its investable assets in seven separately registered investment companies (Portfolios) managed by Eaton Vance Management or its affiliates. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B or Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. |
1
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
MSCI EAFE Index, outperformed domestic equities, as measured by the S&P 500 Index, for the fiscal year, by almost three-to-one. Although the Fund’s allocation was pared back over the period, its continued sizeable weighting in international stocks helped performance.
• | | Fund performance was restrained by its relatively modest exposure to mid-cap stocks, which posted some of the strongest returns of the year among domestic equities. During the period, the Fund also retained its emphasis of the growth style over value style by emphasizing growth portfolios, which paid off, as growth re-established market dominance during the year. |
|
• | | We continue to believe that the Fund’s multi-cap and multi-style asset exposure can provide investors with diversification and the potential for lower volatility. In allocating the Fund’s assets among the Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Portfolios, management seeks to maintain broad diversification and to emphasize market sectors that we believe offer relatively attractive risk-adjusted return prospects, based on its assessment of current and future market trends and conditions. To the extent possible, adjustments in allocations among the Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Portfolios will be made in a tax-efficient manner. |
|
• | | As always, I would like to thank my fellow shareholders for their continued confidence and participation in Fund. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio manager and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Information provided in the report may not be representative of the Fund’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Lipper Quintile Rankings1
By total return as of 10/31/09
EATON VANCE TAX-MANAGED EQUITY ASSET ALLOCATION FUND, CLASS A
LIPPER MULTI-CAP CORE FUNDS CLASSIFICATION
| | | | |
Period | | Quintile | | Ranking |
1 Year | | 4th | | 563 of 798 funds |
3 Years | | 2nd | | 164 of 658 funds |
5 Years | | 1st | | 65 of 507 funds |
| | |
1 | | Source: Lipper Inc. Rankings are based on percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not take sales charges into consideration. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. |
Fund Composition
Current Allocations2
By net assets
| | |
2 | | As a percentage of the Fund’s net assets as of 10/31/09. You may obtain free copies of each of the Portfolios’ most recent financial statements by contacting Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. at 1-800-262-1122 or from the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website (www.sec.gov). |
2
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the Russell 3000 Index, a broad-based, unmanaged market index of 3,000 U.S. stocks. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A and the Russell 3000 Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b7fa/0b7fa9252063d4c576a0b815c9767b7a499c0839" alt="(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)"
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 3/4/02.
A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class B shares and Class C shares on 3/4/02 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $11,765 and $11,742, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | | EAEAX | | EBEAX | | ECEAX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 10.98 | % | | | 10.14 | % | | | 10.18 | % |
Five Years | | | 2.88 | | | | 2.11 | | | | 2.10 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 2.88 | | | | 2.14 | | | | 2.12 | |
|
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 4.59 | % | | | 5.14 | % | | | 9.18 | % |
Five Years | | | 1.66 | | | | 1.74 | | | | 2.10 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 2.09 | | | | 2.14 | | | | 2.12 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates – Class A: 3/4/02; Class B: 3/4/02; Class C: 3/4/02 |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class B shares reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.36 | % | | | 2.11 | % | | | 2.11 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
“Return Before Taxes” does not take into consideration shareholder taxes. It is most relevant to tax-free or tax-deferred shareholder accounts. “Return After Taxes on Distributions” reflects the impact of federal income taxes due on Fund distributions of dividends and capital gains. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who continue to hold their shares. “Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares” also reflects the impact of taxes on capital gain or loss realized upon a sale of shares. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who sell their shares.
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 10.98 | % | | | 2.88 | % | | | 2.88 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 10.87 | | | | 2.51 | | | | 2.65 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 7.23 | | | | 2.54 | | | | 2.53 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 4.59 | % | | | 1.66 | % | | | 2.09 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 4.50 | | | | 1.30 | | | | 1.86 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 3.08 | | | | 1.49 | | | | 1.84 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 10.18 | % | | | 2.10 | % | | | 2.12 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 10.18 | | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.90 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 6.62 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 1.87 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 9.18 | % | | | 2.10 | % | | | 2.12 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 9.18 | | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.90 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 5.97 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 1.87 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 10.14 | % | | | 2.11 | % | | | 2.14 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 10.14 | | | | 1.78 | | | | 1.93 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 6.59 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 1.89 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 5.14 | % | | | 1.74 | % | | | 2.14 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 5.14 | | | | 1.40 | | | | 1.93 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 3.34 | | | | 1.57 | | | | 1.89 | |
Class A, Class B and Class C of the Fund commenced investment operations on 3/4/02. Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) reflect the deduction of the maximum initial sales charge and applicable CDSC, while Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) do not.
After-tax returns are calculated using certain assumptions. After-tax returns are calculated using the highest historical individual federal income tax rates and do not reflect the impact of state and local taxes. Actual after-tax returns depend on a shareholder’s tax situation and the actual characterization of distributions and may differ from those shown. After-tax returns are not relevant to shareholders who hold shares in tax-deferred accounts or to shares held by non-taxable entities. Return After Taxes on Distributions for a period may be the same as Return Before Taxes for the same period because no taxable distributions were made during that period, or because the taxable portion of distributions made during the period was insignificant. Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares for a period may be greater than or equal to Return After Taxes on Distributions for the same period because of losses realized on the sale of Fund shares.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
4
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,208.10 | | | | $7.90 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,203.20 | | | | $12.05 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,202.70 | | | | $12.05 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.00 | | | | $7.22 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,014.30 | | | | $11.02 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,014.30 | | | | $11.02 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.42% for Class A shares, 2.17% for Class B shares and 2.17% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolios. | |
5
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Tax-Managed Growth Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $153,363,079) | | $ | 127,821,964 | | | |
Investment in Tax-Managed Value Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $83,596,190) | | | 116,826,558 | | | |
Investment in Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $66,658,384) | | | 84,473,744 | | | |
Investment in Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $44,278,261) | | | 53,422,605 | | | |
Investment in Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $29,249,733) | | | 35,318,650 | | | |
Investment in Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $42,011,915) | | | 46,663,213 | | | |
Investment in Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $31,212,714) | | | 36,024,071 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 522,012 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 501,072,817 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 1,818,701 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 51,873 | | | |
Administration fee | | | 66,589 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 276,514 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 199,856 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 2,413,575 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 498,659,242 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 534,732,986 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolios | | | (88,088,628 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 1,834,355 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolios | | | 50,180,529 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 498,659,242 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 250,371,503 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 22,703,314 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 11.03 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 11.70 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 61,375,486 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 5,823,337 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 10.54 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 186,912,253 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 17,798,696 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 10.50 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends allocated from Portfolios (net of foreign taxes, $427,346) | | $ | 10,554,669 | | | |
Interest allocated from Portfolios | | | 82,361 | | | |
Securities lending income allocated from Portfolios, net | | | 83,296 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolios | | | (3,569,342 | ) | | |
|
|
Net investment income from Portfolios | | $ | 7,150,984 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 491,051 | | | |
Administration fee | | | 696,220 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 573,890 | | | |
Class B | | | 621,878 | | | |
Class C | | | 1,724,869 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 53,090 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 483,548 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 69,563 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 87,328 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 60,722 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 20,942 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 4,883,601 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 2,267,383 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolios |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (65,222,909 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | (126,600 | ) | | |
Capital gain distributions received | | | 120,441 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (65,229,068 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 102,895,812 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 890,033 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 103,785,845 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 38,556,777 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 40,824,160 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 2,267,383 | | | $ | 2,440,596 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions and capital gain distributions received | | | (65,229,068 | ) | | | (39,705,645 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 103,785,845 | | | | (289,754,241 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 40,824,160 | | | $ | (327,019,290 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (1,356,903 | ) | | $ | (3,525,890 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (307,373 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (1,116,756 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | (18,733,835 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (7,733,495 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (16,106,159 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (1,356,903 | ) | | $ | (47,523,508 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 48,090,646 | | | $ | 108,627,108 | | | |
Class B | | | 4,332,602 | | | | 10,055,682 | | | |
Class C | | | 34,207,297 | | | | 66,054,098 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 1,152,422 | | | | 19,167,382 | | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | 7,018,431 | | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | 13,632,905 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (84,176,234 | ) | | | (81,113,575 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (19,053,766 | ) | | | (21,139,440 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (57,364,107 | ) | | | (54,699,083 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 6,126,460 | | | | 11,264,640 | | | |
Class B | | | (6,126,460 | ) | | | (11,264,640 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (72,811,140 | ) | | $ | 67,603,508 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (33,343,883 | ) | | $ | (306,939,290 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 532,003,125 | | | $ | 838,942,415 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 498,659,242 | | | $ | 532,003,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 1,834,355 | | | $ | 1,128,319 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 10.000 | | | $ | 16.900 | | | $ | 14.040 | | | $ | 12.100 | | | $ | 10.790 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.074 | | | $ | 0.102 | | | $ | 0.146 | (2) | | $ | 0.053 | | | $ | 0.018 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.011 | | | | (6.018 | ) | | | 3.110 | | | | 2.201 | | | | 1.292 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.085 | | | $ | (5.916 | ) | | $ | 3.256 | | | $ | 2.254 | | | $ | 1.310 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.055 | ) | | $ | (0.156 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.828 | ) | | | (0.396 | ) | | | (0.314 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.055 | ) | | $ | (0.984 | ) | | $ | (0.396 | ) | | $ | (0.314 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 11.030 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | $ | 16.900 | | | $ | 14.040 | | | $ | 12.100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 10.98 | % | | | (37.07 | )% | | | 23.71 | % | | | 18.96 | % | | | 12.14 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 250,372 | | | $ | 258,039 | | | $ | 374,979 | | | $ | 247,710 | | | $ | 169,704 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.44 | % | | | 1.36 | % | | | 1.35 | % | | | 1.40 | % | | | 1.43 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 0.78 | % | | | 0.72 | % | | | 0.96 | %(2) | | | 0.41 | % | | | 0.15 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Growth Portfolio | | | 3 | % | | | 1 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 1 | % | | | 1 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Value Portfolio | | | 82 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 40 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio | | | 57 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 25 | % | | | 39 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio | | | 205 | % | | | 283 | % | | | 157 | % | | | 181 | % | | | 217 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio | | | 42 | % | | | 40 | % | | | 38 | % | | | 55 | % | | | 53 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio | | | 95 | % | | | 93 | % | | | 78 | % | | | 99 | % | | | 223 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio | | | 66 | % | | | 103 | % | | | 80 | % | | | 49 | % | | | 24 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment income per share reflects a dividend resulting from a corporate action allocated from Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio which amounted to $0.029 per share. Excluding this dividend, the ratio of net investment income to average daily net assets would have been 0.77%. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee and/or the administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2005). |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 9.570 | | | $ | 16.210 | | | $ | 13.570 | | | $ | 11.800 | | | $ | 10.600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income (loss)(1) | | $ | 0.022 | | | $ | (0.004 | ) | | $ | 0.029 | (2) | | $ | (0.042 | ) | | $ | (0.068 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.948 | | | | (5.775 | ) | | | 3.007 | | | | 2.126 | | | | 1.268 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.970 | | | $ | (5.779 | ) | | $ | 3.036 | | | $ | 2.084 | | | $ | 1.200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.033 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.828 | ) | | | (0.396 | ) | | | (0.314 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.861 | ) | | $ | (0.396 | ) | | $ | (0.314 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 10.540 | | | $ | 9.570 | | | $ | 16.210 | | | $ | 13.570 | | | $ | 11.800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 10.14 | % | | | (37.56 | )% | | | 22.89 | % | | | 17.98 | % | | | 11.32 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 61,375 | | | $ | 78,618 | | | $ | 154,094 | | | $ | 139,586 | | | $ | 123,431 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 2.19 | % | | | 2.11 | % | | | 2.10 | % | | | 2.15 | % | | | 2.18 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 0.24 | % | | | (0.03 | )% | | | 0.20 | %(2) | | | (0.33 | )% | | | (0.59 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Growth Portfolio | | | 3 | % | | | 1 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 1 | % | | | 1 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Value Portfolio | | | 82 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 40 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio | | | 57 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 25 | % | | | 39 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio | | | 205 | % | | | 283 | % | | | 157 | % | | | 181 | % | | | 217 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio | | | 42 | % | | | 40 | % | | | 38 | % | | | 55 | % | | | 53 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio | | | 95 | % | | | 93 | % | | | 78 | % | | | 99 | % | | | 223 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio | | | 66 | % | | | 103 | % | | | 80 | % | | | 49 | % | | | 24 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment income per share reflects a dividend resulting from a corporate action allocated from Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio which amounted to $0.028 per share. Excluding this dividend, the ratio of net investment income to average daily net assets would have been 0.01%. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee and/or the administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2005). |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 9.530 | | | $ | 16.180 | | | $ | 13.550 | | | $ | 11.780 | | | $ | 10.580 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income (loss)(1) | | $ | 0.018 | | | $ | (0.004 | ) | | $ | 0.031 | (2) | | $ | (0.043 | ) | | $ | (0.068 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.952 | | | | (5.761 | ) | | | 2.995 | | | | 2.127 | | | | 1.268 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.970 | | | $ | (5.765 | ) | | $ | 3.026 | | | $ | 2.084 | | | $ | 1.200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.057 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.828 | ) | | | (0.396 | ) | | | (0.314 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.885 | ) | | $ | (0.396 | ) | | $ | (0.314 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 10.500 | | | $ | 9.530 | | | $ | 16.180 | | | $ | 13.550 | | | $ | 11.780 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 10.18 | % | | | (37.60 | )% | | | 22.85 | % | | | 18.01 | % | | | 11.34 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 186,912 | | | $ | 195,347 | | | $ | 309,869 | | | $ | 214,009 | | | $ | 158,138 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 2.19 | % | | | 2.11 | % | | | 2.10 | % | | | 2.15 | % | | | 2.18 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 0.20 | % | | | (0.03 | )% | | | 0.21 | %(2) | | | (0.34 | )% | | | (0.59 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Growth Portfolio | | | 3 | % | | | 1 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 1 | % | | | 1 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Value Portfolio | | | 82 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 40 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio | | | 57 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 25 | % | | | 39 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio | | | 205 | % | | | 283 | % | | | 157 | % | | | 181 | % | | | 217 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio | | | 42 | % | | | 40 | % | | | 38 | % | | | 55 | % | | | 53 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio | | | 95 | % | | | 93 | % | | | 78 | % | | | 99 | % | | | 223 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio | | | 66 | % | | | 103 | % | | | 80 | % | | | 49 | % | | | 24 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment income per share reflects a dividend resulting from a corporate action allocated from Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio which amounted to $0.028 per share. Excluding this dividend, the ratio of net investment income to average daily net assets would have been 0.02%. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee and/or the administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2005). |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers three classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income and losses, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund’s investment objective is to achieve long-term, after tax returns. The Fund currently pursues its objective by investing all of its investable assets in interests in the following seven tax-managed equity portfolios managed by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) or its affiliates: Tax-Managed Growth Portfolio, Tax-Managed Value Portfolio, Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio, Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio, Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio, Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio and Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio (the Portfolios), which are New York trusts. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolios reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Tax-Managed Growth Portfolio, Tax-Managed Value Portfolio, Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio, Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio, Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio, Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio and Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio, (1.4%, 7.1%, 43.6%, 42.0%, 50.8%, 28.6% and 53.3%, respectively, at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolios. A copy of each Portfolio’s financial statements is available on the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website (www.sec.gov), at the Commission’s public reference room in Washington, DC or upon request from the Fund’s principal underwriter, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), by calling 1-800-262-1122.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — The valuation policy of each Portfolio is as follows: Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of a Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant
11
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolios may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management) and Eaton Vance Cash Collateral Fund, LLC (Cash Collateral Fund), affiliated investment companies managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR) and Eaton Vance Management (EVM), respectively. Cash Management and Cash Collateral Fund normally value their investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique in accordance with Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management and Cash Collateral Fund may value their investment securities based on available market quotations provided by a third party pricing service.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolios, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary. The Fund also seeks to avoid payment of federal excise tax.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $85,333,125 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2016 ($29,926,991) and October 31, 2017 ($55,406,134).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make at least one distribution annually (normally in December) of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net
12
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 1,356,903 | | | $ | 10,144,465 | | | |
Long-term capital gains | | $ | — | | | $ | 37,379,043 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $209,065, accumulated undistributed net investment income was decreased by $204,444 and paid-in capital was decreased by $4,621 due to non-deductible expenses and differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for distributions from real estate investment trusts (REITs), investments in passive foreign investment companies and foreign currency gain (loss). These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 1,950,942 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (85,333,125 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 47,308,439 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, partnership allocations, investments in partnerships and distributions from REITs.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by EVM as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.80% of the Fund’s average daily net assets up to $500 million, 0.75% from $500 million but less than $1 billion and at reduced rates on daily net assets of $1 billion or more, and is payable monthly. The investment adviser fee payable by the Fund is reduced by the Fund’s allocable portion of the adviser fees paid by the Portfolios in which it invests. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund’s investment adviser fee totaled $3,711,615, of which $3,220,564 was allocated from the Portfolios and $491,051 was paid or accrued directly by the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund’s investment adviser fee, including the fees allocated from the Portfolios, was 0.80% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The administration fee is earned by EVM as compensation for administering the business affairs of the Fund and is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $696,220.
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $29,552 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that EVD, an affiliate of EVM, received $78,493 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolios who are not members of EVM’s organization, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolios are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $573,890 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by
13
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $466,408 and $1,293,652 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $1,943,000 and $12,701,000, respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $155,470 and $431,217 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $20,000, $115,000 and $34,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investments in the Portfolios were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | Contributions | | | Withdrawals | | | |
|
Tax-Managed Growth Portfolio | | $ | 264,054 | | | $ | 14,311,037 | | | |
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio | | | 1,003,839 | | | | 17,092,441 | | | |
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio | | | 3,299,192 | | | | 25,710,448 | | | |
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio | | | 1,376,885 | | | | 12,710,935 | | | |
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio | | | 455 | | | | 14,064,398 | | | |
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio | | | 965,236 | | | | 1,050,568 | | | |
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio | | | 965,235 | | | | 1,683,259 | | | |
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 5,245,826 | | | | 7,819,508 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 128,619 | | | | 1,236,605 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (9,154,682 | ) | | | (6,240,374 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 668,930 | | | | 812,485 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (3,111,307 | ) | | | 3,628,224 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 487,653 | | | | 731,197 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 470,089 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (2,184,655 | ) | | | (1,643,773 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (697,939 | ) | | | (846,624 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (2,394,941 | ) | | | (1,289,111 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 3,861,784 | | | | 4,869,453 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 916,190 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (6,557,665 | ) | | | (4,445,059 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (2,695,881 | ) | | | 1,340,584 | | | |
|
|
14
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
8 Fair Value Measurements
The Fund adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. At October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the Fund’s investments in the Portfolios were valued based on Level 1 inputs.
9 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 22, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
15
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance
Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 22, 2009
16
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of qualified dividend income for individuals and the dividends received deduction for corporations.
Qualified Dividend Income. The Fund designates $10,399,166, or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
Dividends Received Deduction. Corporate shareholders are generally entitled to take the dividends received deduction on the portion of the Fund’s dividend distribution that qualifies under tax law. For the Fund’s fiscal 2009 ordinary income dividends, 100% qualifies for the corporate dividends received deduction.
17
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
18
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”), as well as the investment advisory agreements of Tax-Managed Growth Portfolio, Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio, Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio, Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio, Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio (formerly, Tax-Managed Small-Cap Growth Portfolio), Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio and Tax-Managed Value Portfolio (the “Portfolios”), the portfolios in which the Fund invests, each with Boston Management and Research (“BMR”), including their fee structures, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. In addition, the Contract Review Committee concluded that each of the investment sub-advisory agreements between BMR and Atlanta Capital Management Company, LLC (“Atlanta Capital”), with respect to Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio, between BMR and Eagle Global Advisors, L.L.C. (“Eagle”), with respect to Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio, and between BMR and Fox Asset Management LLC (“Fox”), with respect to Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio, including the fee structure of each agreement, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Fund and the Portfolios. EVM and BMR are each referred to as an “Adviser” herein; EVM with respect to the Fund and BMR with respect to the Portfolios. EVM and BMR are affiliates. Eagle, Fox and Atlanta Capital are referred to herein as the “Sub-advisers.” Fox and Atlanta Capital are affiliates of EVM and BMR.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Fund and each Portfolio and the sub-advisory agreement of each relevant Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to each Portfolio by BMR and to the relevant Portfolio by the Sub-adviser and to the Fund by EVM. BMR manages the Portfolios, while EVM allocates the assets of the Fund among the Portfolios.
The Board considered BMR’s and the Sub-advisers’ management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolios, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolios. The Board specifically noted BMR’s in-house equity research capabilities and experience in managing funds that seek to maximize after-tax returns. For all the Portfolios, the Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund and each Portfolio by senior management. The Board also considered the capabilities of each Sub-adviser.
19
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of Eaton Vance Management and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser and Sub-advisers, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board also considered the performance of the underlying Portfolios. The Board concluded that the Fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolios and the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees, including administrative fees, and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered the fact that with respect to two of the underlying Portfolios, the Adviser had agreed to waive fees and/or pay expenses of the Portfolios in an additional amount.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund, the Portfolios and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund and the Portfolios, including the benefits of research services that may be available to BMR or the Sub-advisers as a result of securities transactions effected for the Portfolios and other investment advisory clients. The Board also concluded that, in light of its role as a sub-adviser not affiliated with the Adviser, Eagle’s profitability in managing the Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio was not a material factor.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
20
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolios increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Portfolios and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolios, the structure of the advisory fees, which include breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
21
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President | | Trustee since 2007 and President since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
22
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Interested Trustee (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Since 1998 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
23
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
24
Investment Adviser and Administrator of
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Principal Underwriter*
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer Agent
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Jeffrey A. Rawlins, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
Dan R. Strelow, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
Economic and Market Conditions
• The year ending October 31, 2009, closed with economic data showing a modest rebound in global economic fundamentals. For the markets, this rebound was a welcome change after witnessing a freefall in world economic output for the first two quarters of this period, followed by a slowdown in the pace of economic deterioration in the subsequent quarter. As signs of improving economic fundamentals began to emerge, investors’ aversion to risk reversed course and the capital markets staged a comeback.
• In the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers collapse in late 2008, with credit markets at a virtual standstill and global economic activity in decline, prices on riskier assets remained depressed. The last three months of 2008 were marked by the outperformance of U.S. government securities, relative to other asset classes, and a strong U.S. dollar, which were viewed as safe havens amidst the economic downturn. Credit markets, however, rallied sharply in the final two quarters of this twelve month period, and currencies in both developed and emerging markets rose against the dollar.
• | | Amidst historic levels of central bank and government intervention, yield spreads across virtually all fixed income markets have tightened substantially, producing extraordinary returns in the riskier credit markets during the last six months of this 12-month period. A similar return story played out in the currency markets, as the higher yielding emerging market currencies, and currencies of commodity exporting countries, outperformed during the second half of the fiscal year. |
|
• | | The high-yield bond and bank loan markets had strong performance during the period. The S&P/ LSTA Leveraged Loan Index returned 30.44% for the 12-months ending October 31, 2009, while the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index returned 48.79% for the same period. Performance was driven by a combination of technical factors, which improved the market’s supply and demand picture. For bank loans, limited new loan issuance and a contraction of the existing supply through loan repayments reduced the available universe of purchasable loans. Matched with little selling activity and modest but steady inflows, loan prices improved significantly. For high-yield bonds, credit yield spreads—the additional yield over Treasury bonds of comparable maturity—narrowed significantly, from a record level of over 2,000 (20.00%) basis points in mid-December 2008 to 760 (7.6%) as of October 31, 2009. Lower-quality securities led performance for both asset classes in 2009. |
Total Return Performance
10/31/08 – 10/31/09
| | | | |
Class A1 | | | 24.98 | % |
Class B1 | | | 24.22 | |
Class C1 | | | 24.21 | |
Class I1 | | | 1.12 | * |
BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month LIBOR Index2 | | | 1.69 | |
BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index2 | | | 48.79 | |
S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index2 | | | 30.44 | |
Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government Index2 | | | 6.11 | |
| | |
* | | Performance is cumulative since share class inception on 10/1/09. |
See page 4 for more performance information.
Distribution/Yield Information
As of 10/31/093
| | | | | | | | |
| | Distribution | | |
| | Rate | | SEC Yield |
|
Class A | | | 4.86 | % | | | 4.05 | % |
Class B | | | 4.10 | | | | 3.50 | |
Class C | | | 4.10 | | | | 3.50 | |
Class I | | | 5.20 | | | | 5.80 | |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
1 | | These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for the Fund’s Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B shares and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value (NAV). 2 The Fund’s benchmark changed to the BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month LIBOR Index effective July 1, 2009, because the investment adviser believes it is more closely aligned with the Fund’s revised investment objective and policies. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. 3 The Fund’s distribution rate represents actual distributions paid to shareholders and is calculated by dividing the last distribution per share (annualized) by the net asset value. The Fund’s SEC Yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. For current yield information call 1-800-262-1122. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolios’ current or future investments and may change due to active management.
1
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT ’ S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | The mortgage-backed securities (MBS) market benefited from government programs aimed at bolstering the economy and the housing market. One of the most significant positives for the market was the Federal Reserve’s (the Fed) purchase of MBS in the secondary market. This program, designed to sustain lower mortgage rates, started in January 2009. By the end of October, the Fed had purchased just under one trillion dollars in U.S. government agency MBS. The Fed expects to purchase a total of $1.25 trillion in MBS by the end of March 2010. For the twelve month period, MBS yield spreads over U.S. Treasuries, as represented by the BofA Merrill Lynch Mortgage Master Index tightened 70 basis points through October 31, 2009. |
Management Discussion
• | | The Fund’s investment objective is to seek total return. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective primarily by allocating assets among other registered investment companies managed by Eaton Vance Management or its affiliates that invest in different asset classes (the “Portfolios”). The Fund’s portfolio managers, taking market and other factors into consideration, determine the percentage of the Fund’s assets invested in each Portfolio. The Fund also has exposure to derivative instruments. The Fund also invests directly in securities or other instruments to gain exposure to sectors of the market the investment adviser believes may not be represented or are underrepresented by the Portfolios, to hedge certain Portfolio exposures and/or to otherwise manage the exposures of the Fund. The Fund’s investments may include foreign and domestic securities and other instruments, including sovereign debt, MBS, derivative instruments, corporate debt, other fixed-income securities (including taxable municipal securities) and commodities-related investments. Beginning December 14, 2009, the Fund may borrow under the Term Asset-Backed Loan Facility (TALF) program (and any other similar non-recourse loan program). |
|
• | | The Fund’s investments in all asset classes, through the Portfolios, contributed positively to its performance during the past fiscal year, as credit spreads continued their significant tightening trend in most of the major global credit markets. |
|
• | | Within the Fund’s investment in Floating Rate Portfolio—the largest Portfolio weighting as of October 31, 2009—health care, business equipment and services, and cable and satellite television were among the top industry weightings. The Portfolio’s loans were primarily senior, secured loans to companies with average revenues exceeding $1 billion. A slight overweighting to the publishing sector, which has underperformed the overall bank loan market, detracted from performance, as did exposure to the European loan market. On the positive side, the Portfolio’s overweight to the cable and satellite television and business equipment and services industries, both of which performed well, were beneficial to its performance. |
|
• | | Although overwhelmed by the performance of the U.S. credit markets, the Fund’s foreign investments, through its investments in Global Macro Portfolio (beginning mid-July 2009), also contributed positively to its performance. Within this Portfolio, there were stand-out countries in each region. In Latin America, Brazil and Uruguay both benefited from Brazil’s economic resilience during the economic downturn. In Eastern Europe, many of the region’s bond markets benefited from the rally in relatively risky assets in the second half of the fiscal year. In Turkey, aggressive rate cuts by the central banks drove yields to historic lows. Finally, in Asia, Indonesia’s closed economy sheltered it from the economic crisis more than most of its Asian counterparts, benefiting its bonds and currency. |
|
• | | The Fund’s high-yield bond investments, through its investments in Boston Income Portfolio, posted positive returns for the period. In the first half of the year, the Portfolio’s performance lagged the index, as higher quality bonds outperformed the B-rated sector, which was an overweight in the Portfolio. However, in the second half of the year, the lagging performance was offset as riskier assets outperformed, benefiting management’s significant overweight in CCC-rated bonds, in addition to B-rated bonds. |
2
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | In Government Obligations Portfolio, the MBS portion of the Fund, the investment emphasis remained on seasoned, U.S. government agency MBS (seasoned MBS) during the entire period. Typically, seasoned MBS were originated in the 1980s and 1990s. As a result, they have generally lower loan-to-home value ratios, meaning that these homeowners have more equity in their homes than the average borrower. In addition, these loans are guaranteed by government agencies. In the seasoned MBS market, yield spreads to U.S. Treasuries tightened by more than 140 basis points, contributing significantly to the Fund’s outperformance. Principal prepayment rates on these securities were relatively stable for the entire period, paying consistently at an annualized rate in the low teens. |
|
• | | Multi-Sector Portfolio, in which the Fund began investing in mid-July, produced steady, positive returns through the end of the period. This Portfolio was primarily invested in commercial mortgage-backed securities and investment-grade corporate bonds as of October 31, 2009, with the remainder in U.S. Treasuries and cash. In the latter months of the period, Multi-Sector Portfolio benefited from the narrowing of spreads and the rally in fixed-income markets. |
3
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month LIBOR Index, an unmanaged index representing a high-quality base rate for 3-month constant maturity dollar denominated deposits; the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index, an unmanaged index of below investment grade U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bonds publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market; the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index, an unmanaged index of U.S. dollar-denominated leveraged loans; and the Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government Index, an unmanaged index of U.S. government bonds with maturities from one up to (but not including)10 years. The Fund’s benchmark changed to the BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month LIBOR Index effective July 1, 2009, because the investment adviser believes it is more closely aligned with the Fund’s revised investment objective and policies. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A and the BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month LIBOR Index, the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index, the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index, and the Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price (POP). The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EADDX | | EBDDX | | ECDDX | | EIDDX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
One Year | | | 24.98 | % | | | 24.22 | % | | | 24.21 | % | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.25 | | | | 3.48 | | | | 3.48 | | | | 1.12 | %†† |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
One Year | | | 19.03 | % | | | 19.22 | % | | | 23.21 | % | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.22 | | | | 3.16 | | | | 3.48 | | | | 1.12 | %†† |
| | |
† | | Inception dates: Class A: 12/7/04; Class B: 12/7/04; Class C: 12/7/04; Class I: 10/1/09. |
|
†† | | Returns are cumulative since inception of the share class. |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B or Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class B reflect applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.09 | % | | | 1.83 | % | | | 1.83 | % | | | 0.84 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 7/1/09, as supplemented. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
* | | Sources: Lipper, Inc., Morningstar Direct. Class A of the Fund commenced operations on 12/7/04. |
A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class B and Class C shares on 12/7/04 and Class I shares on 10/1/09 would have been valued at $11,826 ($11,648 after deduction of the applicable CDSC), $11,826 and $10,112, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. Index returns are available as of month-end only.
Portfolio Composition
Diversification by Sectors3
By net assets
| | |
3 | | As of 10/31/09. Sectors are shown as a percentage of the Fund’s net assets. See above and the Fund’s prospectus, dated July 1, 2009, for changes to the Fund’s investment strategies, effective July 1, 2009. |
4
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,162.50 | | | | $6.43 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,159.60 | | | | $10.51 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,159.60 | | | | $10.51 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,011.20 | | | | $0.85 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.30 | | | | $6.01 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.50 | | | | $9.80 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.50 | | | | $9.80 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.20 | | | | $5.04 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Class I had not commenced operations as of May 1, 2009. Actual expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.18% for Class A shares, 1.93% for Class B shares, 1.93% for Class C shares and 0.99% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period); 31/365 for Class I (to reflect the period from commencement of operations on October 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009 (September 30, 2009 for Class I). | |
|
| ** | Hypothetical expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.18% for Class A shares, 1.93% for Class B shares, 1.93% for Class C shares and 0.99% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolios. | |
5
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Investments in Affiliated Portfolios — 100.1% |
|
Security | | | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Boston Income Portfolio (identified cost, $69,701,082) | | | | | | $ | 56,936,166 | | | |
Floating Rate Portfolio (identified cost, $113,970,931) | | | | | | | 101,662,717 | | | |
Global Macro Portfolio (identified cost, $70,140,418) | | | | | | | 72,070,639 | | | |
Government Obligations Portfolio (identified cost, $19,210,761) | | | | | | | 24,044,293 | | | |
Multi-Sector Portfolio (identified cost, $50,489,313) | | | | | | | 51,378,250 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments in Affiliated Portfolios | | |
(identified cost $323,512,505) | | $ | 306,092,065 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Put Options Purchased — 0.1% |
|
| | Number of
| | | Strike
| | | Expiration
| | | | | | |
Security | | Contracts | | | Price | | | Date | | | Value | | | |
|
|
S & P 500 Index | | | 20 | | | $ | 1,020 | | | | 12/18/09 | | | $ | 169,500 | | | |
S & P 500 Index | | | 20 | | | | 980 | | | | 12/18/09 | | | | 110,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Put Options Purchased | | | | | | | | | | |
(identified cost $407,740) | | $ | 279,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 0.1% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(1) | | $ | 310 | | | $ | 310,260 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $310,260) | | $ | 310,260 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments �� 100.3% | | |
(identified cost $324,230,505) | | $ | 306,681,825 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (0.3)% | | $ | (977,762 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 305,704,063 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
| | |
(1) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $407,740) | | $ | 279,500 | | | |
Affiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $323,822,765) | | | 306,402,325 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 384,963 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 307,066,788 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 770,183 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 252,641 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 170,134 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 41 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 169,726 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,362,725 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 305,704,063 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 350,776,664 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolios | | | (28,596,204 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 1,072,283 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation from Portfolios | | | (17,548,680 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 305,704,063 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 139,217,218 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 15,657,699 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.89 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 9.33 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 31,637,287 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 3,560,616 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.89 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 133,596,291 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 15,034,470 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.89 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 1,253,267 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 141,001 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.89 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest and other income allocated from affiliated investments | | $ | 20,243,245 | | | |
Dividends allocated from affiliated investments | | | 33,400 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investments | | | (1,952,313 | ) | | |
|
|
Net investment income from Portfolios | | $ | 18,324,332 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 320,433 | | | |
Class B | | | 287,755 | | | |
Class C | | | 1,208,853 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 156,645 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 227,119 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 43,161 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 120,229 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 60,365 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 11,210 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 2,436,270 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 15,888,062 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolios |
|
Net realized gain (loss) allocated from affiliated Portfolios — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (11,155,225 | ) | | |
Securities sold short | | | 2,316 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 740,021 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | (1,159,076 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (564,518 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (12,136,482 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | (128,240 | ) | | |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) allocated from affiliated Portfolios — | | | | | | |
Investments | | | 57,717,503 | | | |
Securities sold short | | | (28,512 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 222,689 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | 511,410 | | | |
Written options | | | 13,591 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (65,962 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 58,242,479 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 46,105,997 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 61,994,059 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 15,888,062 | | | $ | 22,171,487 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, securities sold short, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (12,136,482 | ) | | | (6,433,655 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, securities sold short, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, written options, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 58,242,479 | | | | (71,432,534 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 61,994,059 | | | $ | (55,694,702 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (8,475,603 | ) | | $ | (11,703,356 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (1,686,888 | ) | | | (2,104,477 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (7,078,698 | ) | | | (9,312,164 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (1,034 | ) | | | — | | | |
Tax return of capital | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | (655,719 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (117,910 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (521,744 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (17,242,223 | ) | | $ | (24,415,370 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 39,959,054 | | | $ | 41,804,108 | | | |
Class B | | | 4,825,586 | | | | 5,591,106 | | | |
Class C | | | 17,351,071 | | | | 22,114,622 | | | |
Class I | | | 1,253,488 | | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 6,050,804 | | | | 8,684,367 | | | |
Class B | | | 1,105,428 | | | | 1,470,718 | | | |
Class C | | | 5,068,515 | | | | 6,916,474 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (55,496,567 | ) | | | (85,120,914 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (7,562,529 | ) | | | (9,470,658 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (28,903,305 | ) | | | (55,925,060 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (16,348,455 | ) | | $ | (63,935,237 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 28,403,381 | | | $ | (144,045,309 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 277,300,682 | | | $ | 421,345,991 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 305,704,063 | | | $ | 277,300,682 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 1,072,283 | | | $ | 74,993 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | October 31, 2005(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.600 | | | $ | 9.630 | | | $ | 9.770 | | | $ | 9.760 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.485 | | | $ | 0.568 | | | $ | 0.593 | | | $ | 0.561 | | | $ | 0.430 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.328 | | | | (1.977 | ) | | | (0.095 | ) | | | 0.086 | | | | (0.108 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.813 | | | $ | (1.409 | ) | | $ | 0.498 | | | $ | 0.647 | | | $ | 0.322 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.523 | ) | | $ | (0.588 | ) | | $ | (0.638 | ) | | $ | (0.637 | ) | | $ | (0.562 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.033 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.523 | ) | | $ | (0.621 | ) | | $ | (0.638 | ) | | $ | (0.637 | ) | | $ | (0.562 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.890 | | | $ | 7.600 | | | $ | 9.630 | | | $ | 9.770 | | | $ | 9.760 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 24.98 | % | | | (15.48 | )% | | | 5.22 | % | | | 6.84 | % | | | 3.29 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 139,217 | | | $ | 128,030 | | | $ | 200,163 | | | $ | 144,830 | | | $ | 86,858 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 1.17 | % | | | 1.14 | % | | | 1.10 | % | | | 1.09 | % | | | 1.17 | %(7)(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 6.12 | % | | | 6.22 | % | | | 6.08 | % | | | 5.75 | % | | | 4.84 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Boston Income Portfolio | | | 74 | % | | | 54 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 68 | % | | | 71 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Global Macro Portfolio | | | 25 | % | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Government Obligations Portfolio | | | 28 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 30 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Multi-Sector Portfolio | | | 31 | %(10) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, December 7, 2004, to October 31, 2005. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
|
(8) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its adviser fee and the administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.03%). |
|
(9) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2005. |
|
(10) | | For the period from the Portfolio’s start of business, July 16, 2009, to October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | October 31, 2005(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.590 | | | $ | 9.620 | | | $ | 9.760 | | | $ | 9.750 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.426 | | | $ | 0.500 | | | $ | 0.520 | | | $ | 0.488 | | | $ | 0.365 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.337 | | | | (1.977 | ) | | | (0.095 | ) | | | 0.085 | | | | (0.120 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.763 | | | $ | (1.477 | ) | | $ | 0.425 | | | $ | 0.573 | | | $ | 0.245 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.463 | ) | | $ | (0.524 | ) | | $ | (0.565 | ) | | $ | (0.563 | ) | | $ | (0.495 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.029 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.463 | ) | | $ | (0.553 | ) | | $ | (0.565 | ) | | $ | (0.563 | ) | | $ | (0.495 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.890 | | | $ | 7.590 | | | $ | 9.620 | | | $ | 9.760 | | | $ | 9.750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 24.22 | % | | | (16.13 | )% | | | 4.44 | % | | | 6.05 | % | | | 2.49 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 31,637 | | | $ | 28,616 | | | $ | 38,986 | | | $ | 31,827 | | | $ | 21,926 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 1.93 | % | | | 1.88 | % | | | 1.85 | % | | | 1.84 | % | | | 1.92 | %(7)(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.38 | % | | | 5.48 | % | | | 5.35 | % | | | 5.01 | % | | | 4.11 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Boston Income Portfolio | | | 74 | % | | | 54 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 68 | % | | | 71 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Global Macro Portfolio | | | 25 | % | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Government Obligations Portfolio | | | 28 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 30 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Multi-Sector Portfolio | | | 31 | %(10) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, December 7, 2004, to October 31, 2005. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
|
(8) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its adviser fee and the administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.03%). |
|
(9) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2005. |
|
(10) | | For the period from the Portfolio’s start of business, July 16, 2009, to October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | October 31, 2005(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.590 | | | $ | 9.620 | | | $ | 9.770 | | | $ | 9.750 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.426 | | | $ | 0.500 | | | $ | 0.520 | | | $ | 0.489 | | | $ | 0.362 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.337 | | | | (1.978 | ) | | | (0.105 | ) | | | 0.095 | | | | (0.117 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.763 | | | $ | (1.478 | ) | | $ | 0.415 | | | $ | 0.584 | | | $ | 0.245 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.463 | ) | | $ | (0.523 | ) | | $ | (0.565 | ) | | $ | (0.564 | ) | | $ | (0.495 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.029 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.463 | ) | | $ | (0.552 | ) | | $ | (0.565 | ) | | $ | (0.564 | ) | | $ | (0.495 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.890 | | | $ | 7.590 | | | $ | 9.620 | | | $ | 9.770 | | | $ | 9.750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 24.21 | % | | | (16.13 | )% | | | 4.33 | % | | | 6.16 | % | | | 2.49 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 133,596 | | | $ | 120,654 | | | $ | 182,197 | | | $ | 135,880 | | | $ | 89,806 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 1.93 | % | | | 1.88 | % | | | 1.85 | % | | | 1.84 | % | | | 1.92 | %(7)(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.37 | % | | | 5.48 | % | | | 5.34 | % | | | 5.02 | % | | | 4.08 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Boston Income Portfolio | | | 74 | % | | | 54 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 68 | % | | | 71 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Global Macro Portfolio | | | 25 | % | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Government Obligations Portfolio | | | 28 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 30 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Multi-Sector Portfolio | | | 31 | %(10) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, December 7, 2004, to October 31, 2005. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
|
(8) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its adviser fee and the administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.03%). |
|
(9) | | For the Portfolio’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. |
|
(10) | | For the period from the Portfolio’s start of business, July 16, 2009, to October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.830 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.027 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | | 0.071 | | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 0.098 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.038 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.038 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.890 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 1.12 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 1,253 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 0.99 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 7.29 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Boston Income Portfolio | | | 74 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Global Macro Portfolio | | | 25 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Government Obligations Portfolio | | | 28 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Multi-Sector Portfolio | | | 31 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from commencement of operations, October 1, 2009, to October 31, 2009. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
|
(8) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2009. |
|
(9) | | For the period from the Portfolio’s start of business, July 16, 2009, to October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements12
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charges. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund’s investment objective is to seek total return. Total return is defined as income plus capital appreciation. Prior to July 1, 2009, the Fund’s objective was to provide a high level of current income with a secondary objective of capital appreciation to the extent consistent with its primary objective of high current income. The Fund currently pursues its objective by investing substantially all of its investable assets in interests in the following five portfolios managed by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) or its affiliates: Boston Income Portfolio, Floating Rate Portfolio, Global Macro Portfolio, Government Obligations Portfolio and Multi-Sector Portfolio (the Portfolios), which are New York trusts. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolios reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of Boston Income Portfolio, Floating Rate Portfolio, Global Macro Portfolio, Government Obligations Portfolio and Multi-Sector Portfolio (2.4%, 2.4%, 5.5%, 2.5% and 99.8%, respectively, at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolios. A copy of each Portfolio’s financial statements is available on the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website (www.sec.gov), at the Commission’s public reference room in Washington, DC or upon request from the Fund’s principal underwriter, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), by calling 1-800-262-1122.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — The valuation policies common to the Portfolios are as follows:
Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days and excluding most seasoned mortgage-backed securities) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. If short-term debt securities are acquired with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days, they will be valued by a pricing service. Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-
13
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
valued securities. Exchange-traded options are valued at the last sale price for the day of valuation as quoted on any exchange on which the option is listed or, in the absence of sales on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore as reported by the Options Price Reporting Authority. Over-the-counter options (including options on securities, indices and foreign currencies) are valued by a third party pricing service using techniques that consider factors including the value of the underlying instrument, the volatility of the underlying instrument and the period of time until option expiration. Financial futures contracts are valued at the settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of the average bid and average asked prices that are reported by currency dealers to a third party pricing service at the valuation time. Such third party pricing service valuations are supplied for specific settlement periods and the Portfolios’ forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at an interpolated rate between the closest preceding and subsequent settlement period reported by the third party pricing service. Interest rate swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. Such pricing service valuations are based on the present value of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value using swap quotations provided by electronic data services or by broker/dealers. Credit default swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. The pricing services employ electronic data processing techniques to determine the present value based on credit spread quotations obtained from broker/dealers and expected default recovery rates determined by the pricing service using proprietary models. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolios in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolios might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
Additional valuation policies for Global Macro Portfolio and Government Obligations Portfolio are as follows: Most seasoned, fixed rate 30-year mortgage-backed securities are valued through the use of the investment adviser’s matrix pricing system, which takes into account bond prices, yield differentials, anticipated prepayments and interest rates provided by dealers. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less, that are non-U.S. dollar denominated, are typically valued by a pricing service or dealer quotes.
Additional valuation policies for Boston Income Portfolio and Floating Rate Portfolio are as follows: Interests in senior floating-rate loans (Senior Loans) for which reliable market quotations are readily available are valued generally at the average mean of bid and ask quotations obtained from a third party pricing service. Other Senior Loans are valued at fair value by the investment adviser under procedures approved by the Trustees. In fair valuing a Senior Loan, the investment adviser utilizes one or more of the valuation techniques described in (i) through (iii) below to assess the likelihood that the borrower will make a full repayment of the loan underlying such Senior Loan relative to yields on other Senior Loans issued by companies of comparable credit quality. If the investment adviser believes that there is a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using a matrix pricing approach that considers the yield on the Senior Loan. If the investment adviser believes there is not a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using analyses that include, but are not limited to: (i) a comparison of the value of the borrower’s outstanding equity and debt to that of comparable public companies; (ii) a discounted cash flow analysis; or (iii) when the investment adviser believes it is likely that a borrower will be liquidated or sold, an analysis of the terms of such liquidation or sale. In certain cases, the investment adviser will use a combination of analytical methods to determine fair value, such as when only a portion of a borrower’s assets are likely to be sold. In conducting its assessment and analyses for purposes of determining fair value of a Senior Loan, the investment adviser will use its discretion and judgment in considering and appraising relevant factors. Fair value determinations are made by the portfolio managers of the Fund based on information available to such managers. The portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may not possess the same information about a Senior Loan borrower as the portfolio managers of the Fund. At times, the fair value of a Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of
14
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may vary from the fair value of the same Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of the Fund. The fair value of each Senior Loan is periodically reviewed and approved by the investment adviser’s Valuation Committee and by the Trustees based upon procedures approved by the Trustees. Junior Loans are valued in the same manner as Senior Loans.
In addition to investing in the Portfolios, the Fund may also invest directly in securities. The valuation policies of the Fund are consistent with the valuation policies of the Portfolios.
The Portfolios and the Fund may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM. Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities in the same manner as debt obligations described above.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolios, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund. Interest income on direct investments in securities is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $27,767,877 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2013 ($1,151,435), October 31, 2014 ($1,054,697), October 31, 2015 ($1,377,385), October 31, 2016 ($15,304,398) and October 31, 2017 ($8,879,962).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Purchased Options — Upon the purchase of a call or put option, the premium paid by the Fund is included in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as an investment. The amount of the investment is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current market value of the option purchased, in accordance with the Fund’s policies on investment valuations discussed above. If an option which the Fund has purchased expires on the stipulated expiration date, the Fund will realize a loss in the amount of the cost of the option. If the Fund enters into a closing sale transaction, the Fund will realize a gain or loss, depending on whether the sales proceeds from the closing sale transaction are greater or less than the cost of the option. If the Fund exercises a put
15
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
option, it will realize a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security, and the proceeds from such sale will be decreased by the premium originally paid. If the Fund exercises a call option, the cost of the security which the Fund purchases upon exercise will be increased by the premium originally paid. The risk associated with purchasing options is limited to the premium originally paid.
I Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund declares dividends daily to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are generally paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any) are made at least annually. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 17,242,223 | | | $ | 23,119,997 | | | |
Tax return of capital | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,295,373 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $2,866,323, accumulated undistributed net investment income was increased by $2,351,451 and paid-in capital was decreased by $5,217,774 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss), premium amortization, swap contracts, paydown gain (loss), defaulted bonds and mixed straddles. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 1,574,356 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (27,767,877 | ) | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (18,626,439 | ) | | |
Other temporary differences | | $ | (252,641 | ) | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, partnership allocations, defaulted bond interest, futures contracts, foreign currency gain (loss), premium amortization, swap contracts, paydown gain (loss), mixed straddles and the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
EVM serves as the investment adviser and administrator of the Fund, providing investment advisory services (relating to the investment of the Fund’s assets in the Portfolios) and administering the business affairs of the Fund. EVM does not receive a fee for serving as the Fund’s investment adviser and administrator. The Portfolios have engaged BMR to render investment advisory services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund’s allocated portion of the investment adviser fees paid by the Portfolios was 0.62% of the Fund’s average daily net assets and amounted to $1,710,287.
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $11,871 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that EVD, an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $37,682 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolios who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolios are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its
16
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $320,433 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $215,816 and $906,640 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $1,439,000 and $12,076,000, respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $71,939 and $302,213 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $1,000, $105,000 and $10,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investments in the Portfolios were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | Contributions | | | Withdrawals | | | |
|
Boston Income Portfolio | | $ | 16,819,624 | | | $ | 82,175,515 | | | |
Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 10,867,193 | | | | 25,796,536 | | | |
Global Macro Portfolio | | | 70,297,716 | | | | 1,000,000 | | | |
Government Obligations Portfolio | | | 22,548,766 | | | | 98,988,951 | | | |
Multi-Sector Portfolio | | | 50,069,113 | | | | — | | | |
7 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Fund at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 325,308,264 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 0 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (18,626,439 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (18,626,439 | ) | | |
|
|
8 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of
17
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 5,054,177 | | | | 4,532,622 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 766,172 | | | | 958,445 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (7,013,187 | ) | | | (9,423,479 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (1,192,838 | ) | | | (3,932,412 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 619,430 | | | | 611,246 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 140,314 | | | | 162,815 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (968,447 | ) | | | (1,056,020 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (208,703 | ) | | | (281,959 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 2,198,049 | | | | 2,398,942 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 643,017 | | | | 764,924 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (3,698,163 | ) | | | (6,204,529 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (857,097 | ) | | | (3,040,663 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Period Ended
| | | | | | |
Class I | | October 31, 2009(1) | | | | | | |
|
Sales | | | 141,001 | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 141,001 | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class I commenced operations on October 1, 2009. |
9 Financial Instruments
The Fund adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815-10), effective May 1, 2009. Such standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. The disclosure below includes additional information as a result of implementing FAS 161.
The Fund is subject to equity price risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objective. The Fund generally intends to purchase index put options below the current value of the index to reduce the Fund’s exposure to market risk and volatility. In buying index put options, the Fund in effect, acquires protection against decline in the value of the applicable index below the exercise price in exchange for the option premium paid.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is equity price risk at October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value | | | |
| | Asset
| | | Liability
| | | |
Derivative | | Derivatives | | | Derivatives | | | |
|
Purchased options | | $ | 279,500(1 | ) | | $ | – | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Unaffiliated investments, at value. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is equity price risk for the six months ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Change in
| | | |
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | Realized Gain
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
| | (Loss) on
| | | (Depreciation) on
| | | |
| | Derivatives
| | | Derivatives
| | | |
| | Recognized in
| | | Recognized in
| | | |
Derivative | | Income | | | Income | | | |
|
|
Purchased options | | $ | — | | | $ | (128,240 | )(1) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — Investments |
The average number of purchased option contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009 was 12.
18
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
10 Fair Value Measurements
The Fund adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Fund’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Investments in Affiliated Portfolios | | $ | 306,092,065 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 306,092,065 | | | |
Put Options Purchased | | | 279,500 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 279,500 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 310,260 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 310,260 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 306,681,825 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 306,681,825 | | | |
|
|
11 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 28, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
19
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Diversified
Income Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The financial highlights for the year ended October 31, 2006, and the period from the start of business, December 7, 2004, to October 31, 2005, were audited by other auditors. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial highlights in their report dated December 27, 2006.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 2009
20
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of qualified dividend income.
Qualified Dividend Income. The Fund designates $32,687, or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
21
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited)
The Fund held a joint Special Meeting of Shareholders on October 23, 2009 (adjourned from September 25, 2009) to approve an amendment to the current fundamental investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale of physical commodities and commodities contracts to provide that the Fund may invest in all types of commodities, commodities contracts and commodities related investments to the extent permitted by law. The following action was taken by the shareholders:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Number of Shares | |
For | | | Against | | | Abstain | |
| |
|
| 15,185,553 | | | | 1,607,970 | | | | 2,290,443 | |
22
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
23
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”), as well as the continuance and/or initial approval of the investment advisory agreements of Boston Income Portfolio, Floating Rate Portfolio, Government Obligations Portfolio, Multi-Sector Portfolio, Global Macro Portfolio, Investment Grade Income Portfolio, Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio, Investment Portfolio, Cash Management Portfolio, High Income Opportunities Portfolio and International Income Portfolio, the portfolios in which the Fund is authorized to invest (the “Portfolios”), each with Boston Management and Research (“BMR”), including their fee structures, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve the investment advisory agreements for the Fund and the Portfolios. EVM and BMR are each referred to as an “Adviser” herein; EVM with respect to the Fund and BMR with respect to the Portfolios. EVM and BMR are affiliates.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Fund and the Portfolios, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolios by BMR and to the Fund by EVM. BMR manages the Portfolios, while EVM allocates the assets of the Fund among the Portfolios and is also authorized to cause the Fund to make direct investments in the same type of securities in which the Portfolios are authorized to invest.
The Board considered EVM and BMR’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolios, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide, or will provide, portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolios. For all the Portfolios, the Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted, or expected to be devoted, to the Fund and the Portfolios by senior management. In addition, the Board considered recent adjustments in the Fund’s investment policies designed to reflect changes in the fixed income markets for the Fund’s securities, including recommendations made by the Adviser throughout the year. The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
24
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by EVM and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one and three-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board also considered the performance of the underlying Portfolios. The Board concluded that the Fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Fund directly or indirectly through its pro rata share of the expenses of each Portfolio (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Fund’s management fees, including administrative fees, and total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered that the Adviser does not receive an advisory fee for direct investments made on behalf of the Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized or projected to be realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund, the Portfolios and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized or expected to be realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund and the Portfolios.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolios increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of certain Portfolios and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund and the Portfolios. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Fund and the Portfolios, the structure of the Portfolio advisory fees, which include breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund and the Portfolios to continue to share such benefits equitably.
25
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust), Boston Income Portfolio (BIP), Cash Management Portfolio (CMP), Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio (EMLIP), Floating Rate Portfolio (FRP), Global Macro Portfolio (GMP), Government Obligations Portfolio (GOP), High Income Opportunities Portfolio (HIOP), International Income Portfolio (IIP), Investment Grade Income Portfolio (IGIP), Investment Portfolio (IP) and Multi-Sector Portfolio (MSP) (collectively, the Portfolios) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolios’ affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolios are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolios hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolios, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolios’ placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee of the Trust and all Portfolios except MSP since 2007, of MSP since 2009 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolios. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust, BIP, CMP, FRP, GMP, HIOP, IGIP and IP since 2005, of EMLIP and IIP since 2007 and of MSP since 2009 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust and all the Portfolios except MSP since 2007 and of MSP since 2009 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust, BIP, CMP, FRP, GMP, HIOP, IGIP and IP since 2003, of EMLIP and IIP since 2007 and of MSP since 2009 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust, BIP, CMP, FRP, GMP, HIOP, IGIP and IP since 2003, of EMLIP and IIP since 2007 and of MSP since 2009 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
26
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust and all the Portfolios except MSP since 2008 and of MSP since 2009 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust and all the Portfolios except MSP since 2007 and of MSP since 2009 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust, CMP, GMP, GOP and HIOP since 1998; of FRP and IGIP since 2000; of BIP since 2001; of IP since 2002; of EMLIP and IIP since 2007; and of MSP since 2009 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board of the Trust and all the Portfolios except MSP since 2007 and of MSP since 2009; Trustee of the Trust and BIP, CMP, FRP, GMP, HIOP, IGIP and IP since 2005; of EMLIP and IIP since 2007; and of MSP since 2009 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolios | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust, EMLIP, GMP and IIP | | Vice President of the Trust since 2008 and of EMLIP, GMP and IIP since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust, EMLIP, GMP and IIP | | Vice President of the Trust since 2008 and of EMLIP, GMP and IIP since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
27
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolios | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas P. Huggins 3/7/66 | | Vice President of BIP and HIOP | | Vice President of HIOP since 2000 and of BIP since 2001 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 4 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust, EMLIP, GOP, IIP and IP | | Of the Trust, EMLIP, IIP and IP since 2007 and of GOP since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duke E. Laflamme 7/8/69 | | President of CMP and Vice President of IGIP | | President of CMP since 2008, Vice President of IGIP since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 17 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust, CMP and IGIP | | Of the Trust since 2006 and of CMP and IGIP since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Scott H. Page 11/30/59 | | President of FRP | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 11 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust and MSP | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Craig P. Russ 10/30/63 | | Vice President of FRP | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 6 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust, EMLIP, GMP, GOP, IIP and IP | | Of the Trust and GMP since 2002; of EMLIP, IIP and IP since 2007; and of GOP since 1993 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust and MSP | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Payson F. Swaffield 8/13/56 | | President of MSP | | Since 2009 | | Chief Income Investment Officer of EVC. Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 9 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
28
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolios | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of EMLIP, GMP, GOP, IIP and IP | | Vice President of the Trust and President of EMLIP and IIP since 2007 and President of GMP, GOP and IP since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael W. Weilheimer 2/11/61 | | President of BIP and HIOP | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 24 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005; of all the Portfolios except MSP since 2008; and of MSP since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary of the Trust and all the Portfolios except MSP since 2007 and of MSP since 2009 and Chief Legal Officer of the Trust and all the Portfolios except MSP since 2008 and of MSP since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Of the Trust, BIP, CMP, GMP, GOP, FRP, HOP, IGIP and IP since 2004; of EMLIP and IIP since 2007; and of MSP since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolios and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
29
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser and Administrator of
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Diversified Income FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
Aamer Khan, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | Although global equity markets began the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, in free fall, stocks bounced strongly off the bottom set in early March and staged a broad-based rally that continued through the end of the 12-month period. Last fall, on the verge of a possible collapse of the global financial system, risk-averse investors reacted by streaming to the sidelines, sending stocks into a tailspin. By late winter, however, fiscal and monetary interventions by governments around the world began to fuel optimism that the financial crisis would end and global economic growth might resume. |
Judith A. Saryan, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | Amid prospects for a better-than-expected 2009, investor risk appetite began to return, overcoming such lingering concerns as high consumer debt levels, rising unemployment and still-depressed home prices. Corporate profits also started showing improvement, benefiting from cost-cutting and easier earnings comparisons, which further supported the equity market’s rebound. Stocks that had the biggest losses last fall, especially those lower-quality, cyclical issues farther out on the risk spectrum, tended to be those that recovered most quickly as the rally gained steam. |
|
• | | From March through October 2009, the broad-based Standard & Poor’s 500 Index posted strong gains, with only a slight pull back in October ending a string of consecutive monthly gains. For the full one-year period that ended October 31, 2009, the S&P 500 posted a 9.80% return, while the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 7.76% and the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index soared 18.84%. The large-cap Russell 1000 Index returned 11.20%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index gained 6.46%. In terms of investment styles, growth stocks widely out-performed their counterparts in the value space.1 |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Management Discussion
• | | The Fund2 lagged the Russell 1000 Value Index (the Index) for the 12 months ending October 31, 2009. This underperformance was mostly due to unfavorable sector allocation, with an under-representation versus the Index in financials and consumer discretionary detracting the most. Security selection in both these sectors detracted as well, particularly Fund holdings in the capital markets and hotels, restaurants and leisure industries. |
|
• | | Conversely, solid stock selection within the energy and materials sectors, plus an overweighting and favorable selection in the utilities sector, helped to offset some of the Fund’s relative underperformance. The strongest contribution in terms of stock selection came from the oil, gas and consumable fuels industry. |
|
• | | Consistent with the Fund’s objective of achieving total return, our primary focus is on dividend-paying stocks of companies we believe may produce attractive levels of dividend income. For example, the Fund maintained a slightly overweighted allocation to utilities and a roughly sector-neutral allocation to energy, both sectors that tend to represent significant numbers of dividend-paying stocks. |
Total Return Performance
10/31/08 – 10/31/09
| | | | |
Class A3 | | | 0.50 | % |
Class C3 | | | -0.21 | |
Class I3 | | | 0.91 | |
Class R3 | | | 0.29 | |
Russell 1000 Value Index1 | | | 4.78 | |
Lipper Equity Income Funds Average1 | | | 9.29 | |
See page 3 for more performance information.
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
2 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, Dividend Income Portfolio, with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I and Class R shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
1
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | Beginning with the February 2009 distribution, the Fund’s monthly distribution rate was reduced from $0.063 per share to $0.044 per share. The adjustment to the monthly distribution rate reflects the reduced amount of dividend income the Fund expects to receive due to the impact of the ongoing financial crisis on corporate dividend rates and, to a lesser extent, the increased costs of implementing the Fund’s dividend capture strategy. Since its inception, the Fund increased its monthly distribution rate three times and made one special distribution. As portfolio and market conditions change, the rate of distributions on the Fund’s shares may change as well. |
|
• | | As always, we thank you for your continued confidence and participation in the Fund. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Fund’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
Top 10 Holdings1
By net assets
| | | | |
BP PLC ADR | | | 3.1 | % |
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. | | | 2.9 | |
Total SA | | | 2.5 | |
Vodafone Group PLC | | | 2.5 | |
Nestle SA | | | 2.4 | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | | | 2.4 | |
International Business Machines Corp. | | | 2.4 | |
BHP Billiton, Ltd. ADR | | | 2.2 | |
General Dynamics Corp. | | | 2.2 | |
Schlumberger, Ltd. | | | 2.1 | |
| | |
1 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 24.7% of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
Sector Weightings2
By net assets
| | |
2 | | As a percentage of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
2
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the Russell 1000 Value Index, a broad-based, unmanaged market index of U.S. value stocks. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A and the Russell 1000 Value Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9671a/9671a4afee6b2c472b6dad199bd423f160f64472" alt="(LINE GRAPH)"
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 11/30/05.
A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class C shares on 11/30/05 (commencement of operations), and Class I shares and Class R shares on 1/31/06 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $9,019, $8,847, and $8,687, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total returns do not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class C | | Class I | | Class R |
Share Class Symbol | | EDIAX | | EDICX | | EDIIX | | EDIRX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 0.50 | % | | | -0.21 | % | | | 0.91 | % | | | 0.29 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | -1.84 | | | | -2.60 | | | | -3.21 | | | | -3.68 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | |
One Year | | | -5.27 | % | | | -1.13 | % | | | 0.91 | % | | | 0.29 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | -3.31 | | | | -2.60 | | | | -3.21 | | | | -3.68 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates – Class A: 11/30/05; Class C: 11/30/05; Class I: 1/31/06; Class R: 1/31/06 |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable CDSC for Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I and Class R shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class C | | Class I | | Class R |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.31 | % | | | 2.06 | % | | | 1.06 | % | | | 1.56 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,162.90 | | | | $7.31 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,158.00 | | | | $11.37 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,164.70 | | | | $5.89 | | | |
Class R | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,159.80 | | | | $8.60 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.50 | | | | $6.82 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,014.70 | | | | $10.61 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.80 | | | | $5.50 | | | |
Class R | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.20 | | | | $8.03 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.34% for Class A shares, 2.09% for Class C shares, 1.08% for Class I shares and 1.58% for Class R shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
4
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Dividend Income Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $358,750,259) | | $ | 390,523,618 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 1,931,719 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 392,455,337 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 1,089,992 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Administration fee | | | 51,034 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 172,454 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 145,523 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,459,045 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 390,996,292 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 539,489,926 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (181,463,195 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 1,196,202 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolio | | | 31,773,359 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 390,996,292 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 237,033,622 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 33,294,003 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.12 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 7.55 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 137,459,298 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 19,423,322 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.08 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 16,221,200 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 2,278,817 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.12 | | | |
|
|
|
Class R Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 282,172 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 39,648 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.12 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends allocated from Portfolio (net of foreign taxes, $3,060,443) | | $ | 28,811,525 | | | |
Interest allocated from Portfolio | | | 137,631 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (2,416,663 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 26,532,493 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Administration fee | | | 494,413 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 506,149 | | | |
Class C | | | 1,221,556 | | | |
Class R | | | 1,197 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 471 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 44,222 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 401,781 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 25,301 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 98,049 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 83,884 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 14,648 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 2,891,671 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 23,640,822 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (78,448,378 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | 175,173 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (78,273,205 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 65,513,537 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 193,228 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 65,706,765 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | $ | (12,566,440 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 11,074,382 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 23,640,822 | | | $ | 26,063,479 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (78,273,205 | ) | | | (93,640,260 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 65,706,765 | | | | (60,995,015 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 11,074,382 | | | $ | (128,571,796 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (17,145,606 | ) | | $ | (12,900,418 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (9,599,559 | ) | | | (8,161,326 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (401,628 | ) | | | (206,228 | ) | | |
Class R | | | (18,873 | ) | | | (5,417 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (27,165,666 | ) | | $ | (21,273,389 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 145,772,952 | | | $ | 131,458,191 | | | |
Class C | | | 63,160,011 | | | | 72,364,440 | | | |
Class I | | | 14,639,983 | | | | 3,192,722 | | | |
Class R | | | 430,999 | | | | 62,242 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 12,200,691 | | | | 8,901,288 | | | |
Class C | | | 5,401,926 | | | | 4,545,425 | | | |
Class I | | | 311,528 | | | | 158,831 | | | |
Class R | | | 13,716 | | | | 3,862 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (74,399,419 | ) | | | (57,747,660 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (31,981,542 | ) | | | (26,066,612 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (813,737 | ) | | | (2,258,800 | ) | | |
Class R | | | (232,183 | ) | | | (34,227 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 134,504,925 | | | $ | 134,579,702 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 118,413,641 | | | $ | (15,265,483 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 272,582,651 | | | $ | 287,848,134 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 390,996,292 | | | $ | 272,582,651 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 1,196,202 | | | $ | 4,643,766 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.720 | | | $ | 12.640 | | | $ | 11.410 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.508 | | | $ | 0.923 | | | $ | 0.729 | | | $ | 1.401 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.523 | ) | | | (5.087 | ) | | | 1.282 | | | | 0.487 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.015 | ) | | $ | (4.164 | ) | | $ | 2.011 | | | $ | 1.888 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.585 | ) | | $ | (0.756 | ) | | $ | (0.781 | ) | | $ | (0.478 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.585 | ) | | $ | (0.756 | ) | | $ | (0.781 | ) | | $ | (0.478 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 7.120 | | | $ | 7.720 | | | $ | 12.640 | | | $ | 11.410 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 0.50 | % | | | (34.35 | )% | | | 18.18 | % | | | 19.26 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 237,034 | | | $ | 161,744 | | | $ | 166,609 | | | $ | 29,586 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction(5) | | | 1.33 | % | | | 1.31 | % | | | 1.36 | % | | | 1.41 | %(6)(7) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction(5) | | | 1.33 | % | | | 1.31 | % | | | 1.36 | % | | | 1.40 | %(6)(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 7.49 | % | | | 8.72 | % | | | 6.00 | % | | | 14.04 | %(6)(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 177 | % | | | 256 | % | | | 87 | % | | | 170 | %(4)(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 35 | %(4)(9) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, November 30, 2005, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Annualized. |
|
(7) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 1.21% of average daily net assets for the period from the start of business, November 30, 2005, to October 31, 2006). Absent this subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(8) | | For the period from the Portfolio’s start of business, March 24, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(9) | | Represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period during which the Fund was making investments directly in securities. |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.680 | | | $ | 12.580 | | | $ | 11.360 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.446 | | | $ | 0.837 | | | $ | 0.644 | | | $ | 1.322 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.509 | ) | | | (5.061 | ) | | | 1.270 | | | | 0.470 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.063 | ) | | $ | (4.224 | ) | | $ | 1.914 | | | $ | 1.792 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.537 | ) | | $ | (0.676 | ) | | $ | (0.694 | ) | | $ | (0.432 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.537 | ) | | $ | (0.676 | ) | | $ | (0.694 | ) | | $ | (0.432 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 7.080 | | | $ | 7.680 | | | $ | 12.580 | | | $ | 11.360 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (0.21 | )% | | | (34.86 | )% | | | 17.31 | % | | | 18.25 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 137,459 | | | $ | 108,613 | | | $ | 118,841 | | | $ | 23,105 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction(5) | | | 2.08 | % | | | 2.06 | % | | | 2.11 | % | | | 2.16 | %(6)(7) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction(5) | | | 2.08 | % | | | 2.06 | % | | | 2.11 | % | | | 2.15 | %(6)(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 6.61 | % | | | 7.94 | % | | | 5.33 | % | | | 13.27 | %(6)(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 177 | % | | | 256 | % | | | 87 | % | | | 170 | %(4)(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 35 | %(4)(9) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, November 30, 2005, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Annualized. |
|
(7) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 1.21% of average daily net assets for the period from the start of business, November 30, 2005, to October 31, 2006). Absent this subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(8) | | For the period from the Portfolio’s start of business, March 24, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(9) | | Represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period during which the Fund was making investments directly in securities. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.710 | | | $ | 12.640 | | | $ | 11.410 | | | $ | 10.610 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.527 | | | $ | 0.977 | | | $ | 0.831 | | | $ | 1.912 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.513 | ) | | | (5.125 | ) | | | 1.209 | | | | (0.614 | )(3) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.014 | | | $ | (4.148 | ) | | $ | 2.040 | | | $ | 1.298 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.604 | ) | | $ | (0.782 | ) | | $ | (0.810 | ) | | $ | (0.498 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.604 | ) | | $ | (0.782 | ) | | $ | (0.810 | ) | | $ | (0.498 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 7.120 | | | $ | 7.710 | | | $ | 12.640 | | | $ | 11.410 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 0.91 | % | | | (34.28 | )% | | | 18.45 | % | | | 12.62 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 16,221 | | | $ | 2,155 | | | $ | 2,317 | | | $ | 1,098 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction(6) | | | 1.08 | % | | | 1.06 | % | | | 1.11 | % | | | 1.16 | %(7)(8) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction(6) | | | 1.08 | % | | | 1.06 | % | | | 1.11 | % | | | 1.15 | %(7)(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 7.59 | % | | | 9.20 | % | | | 6.87 | % | | | 25.28 | %(7)(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 177 | % | | | 256 | % | | | 87 | % | | | 170 | %(5)(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 35 | %(5)(10) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the initial issuance of Class I shares, January 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
|
(8) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 1.21% of average daily net assets for the period from the initial issuance of Class I shares, January 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006). Absent this subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(9) | | For the period from the Portfolio’s start of business, March 24, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(10) | | Represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period during which the Fund was making investments directly in securities. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class R |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.720 | | | $ | 12.660 | | | $ | 11.400 | | | $ | 10.610 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.528 | | | $ | 0.847 | | | $ | 0.788 | | | $ | 1.162 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.557 | ) | | | (5.057 | ) | | | 1.222 | | | | 0.090 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | (0.029 | ) | | $ | (4.210 | ) | | $ | 2.010 | | | $ | 1.252 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.571 | ) | | $ | (0.730 | ) | | $ | (0.750 | ) | | $ | (0.462 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.571 | ) | | $ | (0.730 | ) | | $ | (0.750 | ) | | $ | (0.462 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 7.120 | | | $ | 7.720 | | | $ | 12.660 | | | $ | 11.400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 0.29 | % | | | (34.63 | )% | | | 18.15 | % | | | 12.15 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 282 | | | $ | 71 | | | $ | 81 | | | $ | 28 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction(5) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.61 | % | | | 1.66 | %(6)(7) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction(5) | | | 1.58 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.61 | % | | | 1.65 | %(6)(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 7.88 | % | | | 8.05 | % | | | 6.51 | % | | | 14.30 | %(6)(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 177 | % | | | 256 | % | | | 87 | % | | | 170 | %(4)(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Fund | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 35 | %(4)(9) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the initial issuance of Class R shares, January 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Annualized. |
|
(7) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 1.21% of average daily net assets for the period from the initial issuance of Class R shares, January 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006). Absent this subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(8) | | For the period from the Portfolio’s start of business, March 24, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(9) | | Represents the rate of portfolio activity for the period during which the Fund was making investments directly in securities. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I and Class R shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income and losses, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Dividend Income Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (95.7% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $173,940,044 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2014 ($1,311,256), October 31, 2015 ($8,547,018), October 31, 2016 ($89,543,701) and October 31, 2017 ($74,538,069).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
11
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make monthly distributions of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 27,165,666 | | | $ | 21,273,389 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was increased by $77,280 and accumulated undistributed net investment income was increased by $77,280 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss) and distributions from real estate investment trusts (REITS). These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 1,196,202 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (173,940,044 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 24,250,208 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales and partnership allocations.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
The administration fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for administrative services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $494,413. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report.
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $19,030 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $194,998 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class C and Class R shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares
12
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $506,149 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class C shares (Class C Plan) and Class R shares (Class R Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class C Plan requires the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of Class C, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $916,167 for Class C shares, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class C Plan was approximately $11,343,000.
The Class R Plan requires the Fund to pay EVD an amount equal to 0.50% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class R shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Trustees of the Trust have currently limited Class R distribution payments to 0.25% per annum of the average daily net assets attributable to Class R shares. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $599, representing 0.25% of the average daily net assets of Class R shares.
The Class C and Class R Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $305,389 and $598 for Class C and Class R shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) of 1% generally is imposed on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class C Plan. CDSCs received on Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $40,000 and $28,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $177,216,723 and $71,208,754, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 21,465,959 | | | | 12,654,295 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,796,280 | | | | 861,638 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (10,931,998 | ) | | | (5,731,544 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 12,330,241 | | | | 7,784,389 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 9,267,293 | | | | 6,923,696 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 799,660 | | | | 442,114 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (4,794,263 | ) | | | (2,661,168 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 5,272,690 | | | | 4,704,642 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
13
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | |
| | |
Class I | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 2,077,838 | | | | 294,565 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 44,723 | | | | 15,405 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (123,107 | ) | | | (213,957 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 1,999,454 | | | | 96,013 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | |
| | |
Class R | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 63,019 | | | | 6,028 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 2,037 | | | | 377 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (34,557 | ) | | | (3,636 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 30,499 | | | | 2,769 | | | |
|
|
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 18, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
14
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Dividend
Income Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, November 30, 2005, to October 31, 2006. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, November 30, 2005, to October 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 18, 2009
15
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of qualified dividend income for individuals and the dividends received deduction for corporations.
Qualified Dividend Income — The Fund designates $17,913,419 or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
Dividends Received Deduction — Corporate shareholders are generally entitled to take the dividends received deduction on the portion of the Fund’s dividend distribution that qualifies under tax law. For the Fund’s fiscal 2009 ordinary income dividends, 11.46% qualifies for the corporate dividends received deduction.
16
Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 94.5% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense — 2.2% |
|
General Dynamics Corp. | | | 140,000 | | | $ | 8,778,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,778,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets — 4.3% |
|
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (The) | | | 135,000 | | | $ | 3,599,100 | | | |
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | | | 50,000 | | | | 8,508,500 | | | |
Northern Trust Corp. | | | 110,000 | | | | 5,527,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 17,635,100 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 5.3% |
|
Banco Santander Brasil SA(1) | | | 150,000 | | | $ | 1,779,000 | | | |
HSBC Holdings PLC ADR | | | 150,000 | | | | 8,308,500 | | | |
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | | | 91,000 | | | | 4,453,540 | | | |
U.S. Bancorp | | | 312,907 | | | | 7,265,701 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 21,806,741 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals — 4.5% |
|
Hewlett-Packard Co. | | | 180,000 | | | $ | 8,542,800 | | | |
International Business Machines Corp. | | | 79,781 | | | | 9,622,386 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 18,165,186 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Construction & Engineering — 3.0% |
|
Bouygues SA | | | 75,000 | | | $ | 3,531,921 | | | |
Fluor Corp. | | | 32,000 | | | | 1,421,440 | | | |
Vinci SA | | | 140,000 | | | | 7,306,328 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,259,689 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 7.9% |
|
AT&T, Inc. | | | 312,530 | | | $ | 8,022,645 | | | |
CenturyTel, Inc. | | | 206,004 | | | | 6,686,890 | | | |
France Telecom SA | | | 310,000 | | | | 7,681,423 | | | |
Verizon Communications, Inc. | | | 201,109 | | | | 5,950,815 | | | |
Windstream Corp. | | | 420,000 | | | | 4,048,800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 32,390,573 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services — 5.0% |
|
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. | | | 123,000 | | | $ | 11,715,750 | | | |
Schlumberger, Ltd. | | | 140,559 | | | | 8,742,770 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 20,458,520 | | | |
|
|
|
Food & Staples Retailing — 3.7% |
|
CVS Caremark Corp. | | | 210,000 | | | $ | 7,413,000 | | | |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | | | 152,800 | | | | 7,591,104 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,004,104 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 2.4% |
|
Nestle SA | | | 214,587 | | | $ | 9,978,630 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,978,630 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 1.6% |
|
Covidien PLC | | | 152,400 | | | $ | 6,419,088 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,419,088 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 2.0% |
|
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 136,400 | | | $ | 7,994,404 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,994,404 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Durables — 1.5% |
|
Whirlpool Corp. | | | 83,000 | | | $ | 5,941,970 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,941,970 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Products — 0.9% |
|
Procter & Gamble Co. | | | 65,000 | | | $ | 3,770,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,770,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 8.7% |
|
Lincoln National Corp. | | | 165,000 | | | $ | 3,931,950 | | | |
MetLife, Inc. | | | 240,000 | | | | 8,167,200 | | | |
Prudential Financial, Inc. | | | 185,000 | | | | 8,367,550 | | | |
Travelers Companies, Inc. (The) | | | 166,692 | | | | 8,299,595 | | | |
Zurich Financial Services AG | | | 30,000 | | | | 6,869,774 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 35,636,069 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Media — 1.0% |
|
Walt Disney Co. (The) | | | 150,000 | | | $ | 4,105,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,105,500 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 2.2% |
|
BHP Billiton, Ltd. ADR | | | 135,000 | | | $ | 8,853,300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,853,300 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements17
Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Multi-Utilities — 4.0% |
|
CMS Energy Corp. | | | 275,000 | | | $ | 3,657,500 | | | |
GDF Suez | | | 206,000 | | | | 8,612,335 | | | |
PG&E Corp. | | | 100,000 | | | | 4,089,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 16,358,835 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multiline Retail — 2.8% |
|
JC Penney Co., Inc. | | | 115,000 | | | $ | 3,809,950 | | | |
Target Corp. | | | 158,817 | | | | 7,691,507 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,501,457 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 12.9% |
|
BP PLC ADR | | | 225,000 | | | $ | 12,739,500 | | | |
Chevron Corp. | | | 53,300 | | | | 4,079,582 | | | |
ENI SpA | | | 335,000 | | | | 8,296,873 | | | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | | | 53,529 | | | | 3,836,424 | | | |
Hess Corp. | | | 65,000 | | | | 3,558,100 | | | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | | | 131,160 | | | | 9,952,421 | | | |
Total SA | | | 173,000 | | | | 10,352,372 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 52,815,272 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Personal Products — 1.2% |
|
Avon Products, Inc. | | | 150,000 | | | $ | 4,807,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,807,500 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals — 6.9% |
|
Abbott Laboratories | | | 158,000 | | | $ | 7,990,060 | | | |
Johnson & Johnson | | | 116,785 | | | | 6,896,154 | | | |
Merck & Co., Inc. | | | 51,967 | | | | 1,607,340 | | | |
Novartis AG ADR | | | 84,000 | | | | 4,363,800 | | | |
Pfizer, Inc. | | | 100,000 | | | | 1,703,000 | | | |
Schering-Plough Corp. | | | 200,000 | | | | 5,640,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 28,200,354 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) — 1.2% |
|
Annaly Capital Management, Inc. | | | 300,000 | | | $ | 5,073,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,073,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Road & Rail — 2.6% |
|
Canadian Pacific Railway, Ltd. | | | 150,000 | | | $ | 6,466,500 | | | |
Union Pacific Corp. | | | 75,000 | | | | 4,135,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,602,000 | | | |
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 1.0% |
|
Analog Devices, Inc. | | | 156,348 | | | $ | 4,007,199 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,007,199 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail — 1.1% |
|
Buckle, Inc. (The) | | | 145,000 | | | $ | 4,351,450 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,351,450 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Tobacco — 2.1% |
|
Philip Morris International, Inc. | | | 182,845 | | | $ | 8,659,539 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,659,539 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 2.5% |
|
Vodafone Group PLC | | | 4,600,000 | | | $ | 10,137,603 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,137,603 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $351,844,856) | | $ | 385,711,083 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 5.2% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(2) | | $ | 21,361 | | | $ | 21,360,772 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $21,360,772) | | $ | 21,360,772 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 99.7% | | |
(identified cost $373,205,628) | | $ | 407,071,855 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.3% | | $ | 1,127,828 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 408,199,683 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
ADR - American Depositary Receipt
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(2) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements18
Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Country Concentration of Portfolio |
|
| | Percentage
| | | | | | |
Country | | of Net Assets | | | Value | | | |
|
|
United States | | | 81.4 | % | | $ | 332,525,596 | | | |
France | | | 9.2 | | | | 37,484,379 | | | |
Switzerland | | | 4.1 | | | | 16,848,404 | | | |
United Kingdom | | | 2.5 | | | | 10,137,603 | | | |
Italy | | | 2.0 | | | | 8,296,873 | | | |
Brazil | | | 0.5 | | | | 1,779,000 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | | 99.7 | % | | $ | 407,071,855 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements19
Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $351,844,856) | | $ | 385,711,083 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $21,360,772) | | | 21,360,772 | | | |
Dividends receivable | | | 2,342,174 | | | |
Tax reclaims receivable | | | 1,305,064 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 410,719,093 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 2,163,498 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 231,237 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 1,243 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 123,432 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 2,519,410 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 408,199,683 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 374,308,490 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 33,891,193 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 408,199,683 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends (net of foreign taxes, $3,213,740) | | $ | 30,257,928 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 145,428 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (89,406 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 30,313,950 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 2,155,706 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 15,571 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 230,432 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 36,525 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 13,416 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 2,451,650 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | | 24 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 24 | | | |
|
|
Net expenses | | $ | 2,451,626 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 27,862,324 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (83,044,315 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | 182,171 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (82,862,144 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 68,741,901 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 203,299 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 68,945,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | $ | (13,916,944 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 13,945,380 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements20
Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 27,862,324 | | | $ | 31,095,800 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (82,862,144 | ) | | | (99,988,068 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 68,945,200 | | | | (67,002,672 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 13,945,380 | | | $ | (135,894,940 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 179,918,700 | | | $ | 210,949,684 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (75,467,439 | ) | | | (101,490,492 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | 104,451,261 | | | $ | 109,459,192 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 118,396,641 | | | $ | (26,435,748 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 289,803,042 | | | $ | 316,238,790 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 408,199,683 | | | $ | 289,803,042 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements21
Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(2) | | | 0.73 | % | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.88 | %(3) | | |
Net investment income | | | 8.04 | % | | | 9.27 | % | | | 6.77 | % | | | 15.44 | %(3) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 177 | % | | | 256 | % | | | 87 | % | | | 170 | %(4) | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 1.11 | % | | | (33.97 | )% | | | 18.88 | % | | | 10.33 | %(4) | | |
|
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 408,200 | | | $ | 289,803 | | | $ | 316,239 | | | $ | 74,638 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 24, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements22
Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Dividend Income Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to achieve total return by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of equity securities that pay dividends. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund held a 95.7% interest in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities based on available market quotations provided by a third party pricing service.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or
23
Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
securities. However, if the ex-dividend date has passed, certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as the Portfolio is informed of the ex-dividend date. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends and capital gains have been provided for in accordance with the Portfolio’s understanding of the applicable countries’ tax rules and rates. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR, a subsidiary of EVM, as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.65% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $2,240,814 of which $85,108 was allocated from Cash Management and $2,155,706 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.65% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
24
Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
During the year ended October 31, 2009, BMR reimbursed the Portfolio $3,417 for a trading error incurred. The effect of the loss incurred and the reimbursement by BMR of such amount had no impact on total return.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $700,522,488 and $577,591,525, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 380,491,420 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 33,244,069 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (6,663,634 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 26,580,435 | | | |
|
|
The net unrealized appreciation on foreign currency transactions at October 31, 2009 on a federal income tax basis was $24,966.
5 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
6 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by companies whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Portfolio, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign securities markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
7 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
25
Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer Discretionary | | $ | 33,894,781 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 33,894,781 | | | |
Consumer Staples | | | 32,241,143 | | | | 9,978,630 | | | | — | | | | 42,219,773 | | | |
Energy | | | 54,624,547 | | | | 18,649,245 | | | | — | | | | 73,273,792 | | | |
Financials | | | 73,281,136 | | | | 6,869,774 | | | | — | | | | 80,150,910 | | | |
Health Care | | | 34,619,442 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 34,619,442 | | | |
Industrials | | | 20,801,440 | | | | 10,838,249 | | | | — | | | | 31,639,689 | | | |
Information Technology | | | 22,172,385 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 22,172,385 | | | |
Materials | | | 8,853,300 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,853,300 | | | |
Telecommunication Services | | | 24,709,150 | | | | 17,819,026 | | | | — | | | | 42,528,176 | | | |
Utilities | | | 7,746,500 | | | | 8,612,335 | | | | — | | | | 16,358,835 | | | |
|
|
Total Common Stocks | | $ | 312,943,824 | | | $ | 72,767,259* | | | $ | — | | | $ | 385,711,083 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 21,360,772 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21,360,772 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 334,304,596 | | | $ | 72,767,259 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 407,071,855 | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Includes foreign equity securities whose values were adjusted to reflect market trading that occurred after the close of trading in their applicable foreign markets. |
The Portfolio held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 18, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
26
Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Dividend Income Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Dividend Income Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, March 24, 2006, to October 31, 2006. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dividend Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, March 24, 2006, to October 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 18, 2009
27
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
28
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Dividend Income Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), the Portfolio in which Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund (the “Fund”) invests, with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including the fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the
29
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-year period ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. In light of the Fund’s relatively brief operating history, the Board concluded that additional time was required to evaluate longer term performance of the Fund.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and by the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Portfolio’s management fees, including administrative fees, and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered the fact that the Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses of the Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and the Portfolio and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Portfolio, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Portfolio and other investment advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Fund, the structure of the Portfolio advisory fee, which include breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
30
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Dividend Income Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2003 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2003 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
31
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 1998 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007; Trustee of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees |
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President | | Vice President of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Vice President of the Trust since 2001 and President of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President | | Vice President of the Trust since 2003 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
32
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust since 2004 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
33
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Dividend Income Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Administrator of Eaton Vance Dividend Income FundEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investing Services
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Dividend Income FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dac5/2dac525caf184dba51e96293f58664c03cf77f72" alt="(PHOTO OF MARK S. VENEZIA )"
Mark S. Venezia, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | The year ending October 31, 2009, closed with economic data showing a modest rebound in global economic fundamentals. For the markets, this rebound was a welcome change after witnessing a freefall in world economic output for the first two quarters of this period, followed by a slowdown in the pace of economic deterioration in the subsequent quarter. As signs of improving economic fundamentals began to emerge, investors’ aversion to risk reversed course and the capital markets staged a comeback. |
• | | In the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers collapse in late 2008, with credit markets at a virtual standstill and global economic activity in decline, prices on riskier assets remained depressed. The last three months of 2008 were marked by the outperformance of U.S. government securities, relative to other asset classes, and a strong U.S. dollar, which were viewed as safe havens amidst the economic downturn. Credit markets, however, rallied sharply in the final two quarters of this twelve month period, and currencies in both developed and emerging markets rose against the dollar. |
|
• | | Amidst historic levels of central bank and government intervention, yield spreads across virtually all fixed income markets have tightened substantially, producing extraordinary returns in the riskier credit markets during the last six months of this 12 month period. A similar return story played out in the currency markets, as the higher yielding emerging market currencies, and currencies of commodity exporting countries, outperformed during the second half of the fiscal year. |
Management Discussion
• | | The Fund1 seeks to provide total return by investing primarily in securities denominated in currencies of emerging market countries, fixed-income instruments issued by emerging market entities or sovereigns, and/or derivative instruments denominated in or based on the currencies, interest rates or issues of emerging market countries. |
• | | During the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, the Fund had strong returns but under-performed its benchmark, the JPMorgan Government Bond Index — Emerging Market Global Diversified (Unhedged) (the “Index”).2 The Fund’s performance was primarily driven by its shorter duration relative to its benchmark in Eastern Europe and Asia. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f3e/e3f3ed5e18f79291a8f12ea66044127c1b39822c" alt="(PHOTO OF JOHN R. BAUR )"
John R. Baur
Co-Portfolio Manager
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0dbc/a0dbc740b2ce2b016029f6a6617b2bc64b0166ce" alt="(PHOTO OF MICHAEL A. CIRAMI)"
Michael A. Cirami, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | In Eastern Europe, the Fund’s underweight duration positions in Hungary, Poland, and Turkey detracted from its performance. This region’s bonds benefited from the rally in relatively risky assets in the second half of the fiscal year. Turkey also benefited from aggressive rate cuts by the central bank, resulting in bond yields at historical lows. Elsewhere in Europe, the Fund’s non-benchmark long exposure to credit in Iceland contributed positively to performance. While the previous year saw Icelandic banks collapse under the weight of a falling currency and large foreign debt, Iceland made strides in 2009 toward economic stability. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08 – 10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A3 | | | 30.05 | % |
JPMorgan Government Bond Index — | | | | |
Emerging Market Global Diversified (Unhedged)2 | | | 32.34 | |
| | |
| | See page 3 for more performance information. |
| | |
|
1 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio (the Portfolio), with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
2 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
|
3 | | Return does not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares. If the sales charge were deducted, the return would be lower. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
1
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | In Asia, the Fund’s underperformance was primarily driven by an underweight duration position in Indonesia. Due in part to a closed economy, Indonesia was sheltered from the economic downturn more than most of its Asian counterparts. Additionally Indonesia benefited as political stability was reinforced when President Yudhoyono was overwhelmingly reelected. |
|
• | | The Fund’s investments in the African region also detracted from its performance relative to the benchmark. The Fund’s underweight position in South Africa was the primary driver, as riskier assets rallied. South Africa also benefited from the recent rise in commodity prices and from fears being allayed that the new president would enact more protectionist policies coming into office. Although minimal, the Fund’s relative performance benefited from its position in Egyptian Treasury Bills as the Egyptian currency appreciated reflecting lower inflation and better-than-expected growth rates. |
|
• | | In Latin America, the underperformance versus the Index was modest. Underperformance due to an underweight in Colombian duration was significantly offset by the Fund’s non-benchmark position in Uruguay. Uruguay, an exporter to Brazil, not only benefited from Brazil’s resilience to the global crisis but also from its own growth momentum, as its economy avoided recession. |
|
• | | The Fund’s duration increased slightly during the year to 4.54 years at October 31, 2009 from 4.25 years at October 31, 2008. Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of a fund or a fixed-income security to changes in interest rates. A shorter duration instrument normally has less exposure to interest rate risk than longer duration instruments. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
Securities Holdings (excludes derivative positions)1
By total net assets
| | |
1 | | Securities Holdings reflect the Portfolio’s securities positions as of 10/31/09. For International and Emerging Market currency exposures, please refer to the Currency Positions table below. |
Currency Positions2
| | | | |
By total net assets | | | | |
|
Poland | | | 11.5 | % |
Turkey | | | 11.4 | |
Brazil | | | 11.3 | |
Mexico | | | 11.1 | |
Malaysia | | | 10.4 | |
Thailand | | | 10.1 | |
Indonesia | | | 10.0 | |
Hungary | | | 9.6 | |
South Africa | | | 7.5 | |
Colombia | | | 4.6 | |
Russia | | | 3.2 | |
Egypt | | | 3.1 | |
Lebanon | | | 2.5 | |
Chile | | | 2.1 | |
Peru | | | 2.1 | |
India | | | 2.0 | |
Norway | | | 1.0 | |
South Korea | | | 0.8 | |
China | | | 0.7 | |
Zambia | | | 0.7 | |
Ukraine | | | 0.7 | |
Uruguay | | | 0.6 | |
Serbia | | | 0.5 | |
Australia | | | 0.5 | |
Ghana | | | 0.4 | |
Sweden | | | 0.2 | |
United Arab Emirates | | | 0.2 | |
Iceland | | | 0.1 | |
Costa Rica | | | 0.1 | |
Sri Lanka | | | 0.0 | |
Japan | | | -0.2 | |
Kazakhstan | | | -0.6 | |
Euro | | | -3.2 | |
| | |
2 | | Currency Positions reflect the Portfolio’s investments as of 10/31/09. Currency exposures include all foreign exchange denominated assets and all currency derivatives. As of 10/31/09, Foreign Long Derivatives were 69.4%; Other Foreign Short Derivatives were 6.8%. All numbers are a percentage of net assets. Total exposures may exceed 100% due to the implicit leverage created by derivatives. |
2
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the JPMorgan Government Bond Index — Emerging Market Global Diversified (Unhedged), an unmanaged broad-based index that currently comprises the local currency, fixed rate coupon issues of 13 markets greater than 1-year in maturity. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A of the Fund and in the JPMorgan Government Bond Index — Emerging Market Global Diversified (Unhedged). Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
| | | | |
Fund Performance1 | | Class A |
Share Class Symbol | | EEIAX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | |
One Year | | | 30.05 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | 9.75 | |
| | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | |
One Year | | | 23.91 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | 7.49 | |
† Inception Date — Class A: 6/27/07.
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. Absent an allocation of expenses to the administrator, the returns would be lower. |
| | | | |
Total Annual | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A |
|
Gross Expense Ratio | | | 5.88 | % |
Net Expense Ratio | | | 1.25 | |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. Net Expense Ratio reflects a contractual expense limitation that continues through February 28, 2010. Thereafter, the expense limitation may be changed or terminated at any time. Without this expense limitation, performance would be lower. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced operations on 6/27/07. Index data is available as of month end only. |
|
| | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
3
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,185.40 | | | | $6.89 | ** | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.90 | | | | $6.36 | ** | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.25% for Class A shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
|
| ** | Absent an allocation of expenses to the administrator, the expenses would be higher. | |
4
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $5,554,970) | | $ | 5,316,274 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 12,941 | | | |
Receivable from affiliate | | | 13,017 | | | |
Other assets | | | 101 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 5,342,333 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 5,066 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 10,508 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 1,181 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 34,837 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 51,634 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 5,290,699 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 6,002,724 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (515,167 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 41,838 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation from Portfolio | | | (238,696 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 5,290,699 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 5,290,699 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 536,968 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.85 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 10.34 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $25,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest allocated from Portfolio (net of foreign taxes, $4,301) | | $ | 146,303 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (20,402 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 125,901 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Distribution and service fees | | $ | 6,600 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 502 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 22,096 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 2,970 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 19,492 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 19,891 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 22,245 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 7,341 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 101,137 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Allocation of expenses to affiliate | | $ | 93,944 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 93,944 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 7,193 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 118,708 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (220,393 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (380 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | 2,883 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | 203,584 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (14,306 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 484,499 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (894 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | 21,054 | | | |
Written options | | | 458 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (71,341 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 433,776 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 419,470 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 538,178 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 118,708 | | | $ | 76,050 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (14,306 | ) | | | (355,353 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, written options, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 433,776 | | | | (672,871 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 538,178 | | | $ | (952,174 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $ | (189,242 | ) | | $ | (109,042 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (384 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (36,996 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (189,242 | ) | | $ | (146,422 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | $ | 3,737,172 | | | $ | 9,023,270 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | 83,956 | | | | 60,153 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (408,172 | ) | | | (6,466,890 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 3,412,956 | | | $ | 2,616,533 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 3,761,892 | | | $ | 1,517,937 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 1,528,807 | | | $ | 10,870 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 5,290,699 | | | $ | 1,528,807 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 41,838 | | | $ | (8,083 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | October 31, 2007(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.280 | | | $ | 10.770 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.487 | | | $ | 0.475 | | | $ | 0.165 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.864 | | | | (1.727 | ) | | | 0.732 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 2.351 | | | $ | (1.252 | ) | | $ | 0.897 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.781 | ) | | $ | (0.640 | ) | | $ | (0.259 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.381 | ) | | | — | | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.217 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.781 | ) | | $ | (1.238 | ) | | $ | (0.259 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital contribution from administrator(2) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.132 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.850 | | | $ | 8.280 | | | $ | 10.770 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 30.05 | % | | | (13.38 | )% | | | 10.44 | %(4)(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 5,291 | | | $ | 1,529 | | | $ | 11 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(6)(7)(8) | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | %(9) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.37 | % | | | 4.73 | % | | | 4.67 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 26 | % | | | 38 | % | | | 2 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Absent a capital contribution by the administrator in the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, total return would have been 9.12%. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 4.25%, 4.63% and 287.76% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009 and 2008 and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, respectively). |
|
(9) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (the Fund) is a non-diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. As of October 31, 2009, the Fund offered one class of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at the time of purchase. Effective November 27, 2009, the Fund began offering Class I shares, which are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (4.6% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $500,426 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2016 ($353,896) and October 31, 2017 ($146,530).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed since the start of business on June 27, 2007 to October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
8
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund declares dividends daily to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are generally paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any) are made at least annually. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 189,242 | | | $ | 109,272 | | | |
Long-term capital gains | | $ | — | | | $ | 154 | | | |
Tax return of capital | | $ | — | | | $ | 36,996 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was increased by $120,455 and accumulated undistributed net investment income was increased by $120,455 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss), swap contracts, premium amortization and paydown gain (loss). These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 23,353 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (500,426 | ) | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (224,444 | ) | | |
Other temporary differences | | $ | (10,508 | ) | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders, swap contracts, foreign currency transactions, written options contracts, futures contracts, wash sales, partnership allocations and premium amortization.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.65% of the Fund’s average daily net assets that are not invested in other investment companies for which EVM or its affiliates serve as investment adviser or administrator (“Investable Assets”) up to $1 billion and is payable monthly. On net assets of $1 billion and over that are invested in Investable Assets, the annual fee is reduced. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund incurred no adviser fee on Investable Assets. To the extent the Fund’s assets are invested in the Portfolio, the Fund is allocated its share of the Portfolio’s adviser fee. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report. EVM also serves as the administrator of the Fund, but receives no compensation. EVM has agreed to reimburse the Fund’s operating expenses to the extent that they exceed 1.25% annually of the Fund’s average daily net assets for Class A. This agreement may be changed or terminated after February 28, 2010. Pursuant to this agreement, EVM was allocated $93,944 of the Fund’s operating expenses for the year ended October 31, 2009.
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $175 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $1,810 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A shares (see Note 4).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
9
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
4 Distribution Plan
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.30% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $6,600 for Class A shares.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
Class A shares may be subject to a 1% contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received no CDSCs paid by Class A shareholders.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $3,669,068 and $490,304, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 389,522 | | | | 893,652 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 9,086 | | | | 6,209 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (46,327 | ) | | | (716,184 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 352,281 | | | | 183,677 | | | |
|
|
At October 31, 2009, EVM owned 18.3% of the outstanding shares of the Fund.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 23, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
10
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 23, 2009
11
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of the foreign tax credit.
Foreign Tax Credit. The Fund designates a foreign tax credit of $4,301 and recognizes foreign source income of $122,698.
12
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Government Bonds — 66.8% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | U.S. $ Value | | | |
|
|
|
Brazil — 7.6% |
|
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional, 6.00%, 5/15/15(1) | | BRL | | | 414,795 | | | $ | 228,174 | | | |
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional, 10.00%, 1/1/10 | | BRL | | | 3,775,000 | | | | 2,146,398 | | | |
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional, 10.00%, 1/1/11 | | BRL | | | 1,425,000 | | | | 805,881 | | | |
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional, 10.00%, 1/1/12 | | BRL | | | 3,842,000 | | | | 2,115,561 | | | |
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional, 10.00%, 1/1/14 | | BRL | | | 4,310,000 | | | | 2,247,995 | | | |
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional, 10.00%, 1/1/17 | | BRL | | | 1,975,000 | | | | 967,276 | | | |
Republic of Brazil, 10.25%, 1/10/28 | | BRL | | | 620,000 | | | | 352,833 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Brazil (identified cost $8,051,496) | | $ | 8,864,118 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chile — 2.1% |
|
Government of Chile, 2.10%, 9/1/15(2) | | CLP | | | 83,800,640 | | | $ | 151,379 | | | |
Government of Chile, 3.00%, 7/1/13(3) | | CLP | | | 482,046,808 | | | | 924,719 | | | |
Government of Chile, 3.00%, 5/1/17(4) | | CLP | | | 649,715,263 | | | | 1,222,674 | | | |
Government of Chile, 5.00%, 9/1/11(5) | | CLP | | | 62,850,480 | | | | 125,969 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Chile (identified cost $2,423,248) | | $ | 2,424,741 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Colombia — 3.0% |
|
Republic of Colombia, 9.85%, 6/28/27 | | COP | | | 2,200,000,000 | | | $ | 1,232,121 | | | |
Republic of Columbia, 12.00%, 10/22/15 | | COP | | | 3,700,000,000 | | | | 2,242,583 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Colombia (identified cost $2,976,872) | | $ | 3,474,704 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Congo — 0.0% |
|
Republic of Congo, 3.00%, 6/30/29 | | USD | | | 109,250 | | | $ | 54,352 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Congo (identified cost $42,861) | | $ | 54,352 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Costa Rica — 0.1% |
|
Titulo Propiedad Ud, 1.00%, 1/12/22(6) | | CRC | | | 88,329,237 | | | $ | 67,098 | | | |
Titulo Propiedad Ud, 1.63%, 7/13/16(7) | | CRC | | | 10,429,115 | | | | 8,052 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Costa Rica (identified cost $102,608) | | $ | 75,150 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Egypt — 0.3% |
|
Arab Republic of Egypt, 8.75%, 7/18/12(8) | | EGP | | | 1,690,000 | | | $ | 321,403 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Egypt (identified cost $295,918) | | $ | 321,403 | | | |
|
|
|
Georgia — 0.2% |
|
Republic of Georgia, 7.50%, 4/15/13 | | USD | | | 280,000 | | | $ | 284,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Georgia (identified cost $195,048) | | $ | 284,200 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ghana — 0.3% |
|
Ghana Government Bond, 13.00%, 8/2/10 | | GHS | | | 470,000 | | | $ | 303,654 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Ghana (identified cost $503,347) | | $ | 303,654 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hungary — 7.6% |
|
Hungary Government Bond, 5.50%, 2/12/16 | | HUF | | | 210,000,000 | | | $ | 1,025,701 | | | |
Hungary Government Bond, 6.00%, 10/24/12 | | HUF | | | 538,920,000 | | | | 2,782,966 | | | |
Hungary Government Bond, 6.00%, 11/24/23 | | HUF | | | 195,000,000 | | | | 928,933 | | | |
Hungary Government Bond, 6.75%, 2/24/17 | | HUF | | | 303,100,000 | | | | 1,560,797 | | | |
Hungary Government Bond, 6.75%, 11/24/17 | | HUF | | | 148,000,000 | | | | 761,552 | | | |
Hungary Government Bond, 7.25%, 6/12/12 | | HUF | | | 322,000,000 | | | | 1,724,742 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Hungary (identified cost $7,843,586) | | $ | 8,784,691 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Indonesia — 7.2% |
|
Indonesia Government, 9.00%, 9/15/13 | | IDR | | | 9,800,000,000 | | | $ | 1,022,371 | | | |
Indonesia Government, 9.00%, 9/15/18 | | IDR | | | 17,700,000,000 | | | | 1,749,705 | | | |
Indonesia Government, 9.75%, 5/15/37 | | IDR | | | 12,436,000,000 | | | | 1,173,444 | | | |
Indonesia Government, 10.00%, 9/15/24 | | IDR | | | 22,100,000,000 | | | | 2,216,908 | | | |
Indonesia Government, 11.00%, 11/15/20 | | IDR | | | 7,910,000,000 | | | | 871,467 | | | |
Indonesia Government, 11.50%, 9/15/19 | | IDR | | | 12,000,000,000 | | | | 1,363,275 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Indonesia (identified cost $7,888,838) | | $ | 8,397,170 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ivory Coast — 0.0% |
|
Ivory Coast, 4.00%, 3/31/28(9) | | USD | | | 75,000 | | | $ | 44,962 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Ivory Coast (identified cost $27,721) | | $ | 44,962 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Macedonia — 0.3% |
|
Republic of Macedonia, 4.625%, 12/8/15 | | EUR | | | 280,000 | | | $ | 360,332 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Macedonia (identified cost $240,491) | | $ | 360,332 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements13
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | U.S. $ Value | | | |
|
|
|
Malaysia — 9.7% |
|
Malaysian Government, 3.74%, 2/27/15 | | MYR | | | 13,350,000 | | | $ | 3,878,178 | | | |
Malaysian Government, 3.76%, 4/28/11 | | MYR | | | 10,900,000 | | | | 3,258,897 | | | |
Malaysian Government, 4.24%, 2/7/18 | | MYR | | | 13,900,000 | | | | 4,087,655 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Malaysia (identified cost $11,158,211) | | $ | 11,224,730 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Mexico — 3.4% |
|
Government of Mexico, 10.00%, 12/5/24 | | MXN | | | 29,210,000 | | | $ | 2,544,088 | | | |
Government of Mexico, 10.00%, 11/20/36 | | MXN | | | 16,370,000 | | | | 1,416,346 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Mexico (identified cost $4,290,032) | | $ | 3,960,434 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Peru — 2.1% |
|
Republic of Peru, 6.90%, 8/12/37(8) | | PEN | | | 2,367,000 | | | $ | 899,923 | | | |
Republic of Peru, 7.84%, 8/12/20 | | PEN | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 402,535 | | | |
Republic of Peru, 8.60%, 8/12/17 | | PEN | | | 2,605,000 | | | | 1,107,952 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Peru (identified cost $2,125,496) | | $ | 2,410,410 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Poland — 3.6% |
|
Poland Government Bond, 3.00%, 8/24/16(10) | | PLN | | | 1,507,766 | | | $ | 498,271 | | | |
Poland Government Bond, 4.75%, 4/25/12 | | PLN | | | 2,010,000 | | | | 690,826 | | | |
Poland Government Bond, 5.25%, 10/25/17 | | PLN | | | 3,575,000 | | | | 1,178,014 | | | |
Poland Government Bond, 5.75%, 9/23/22 | | PLN | | | 5,420,000 | | | | 1,810,981 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Poland (identified cost $4,724,464) | | $ | 4,178,092 | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Africa — 3.4% |
|
Republic of South Africa, 6.50%, 6/2/14 | | USD | | | 500,000 | | | $ | 547,500 | | | |
Republic of South Africa, 7.25%, 1/15/20 | | ZAR | | | 30,500,000 | | | | 3,406,526 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total South Africa (identified cost $3,852,847) | | $ | 3,954,026 | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Korea — 0.2% |
|
Republic of South Korea, 7.125%, 4/16/19 | | USD | | | 160,000 | | | $ | 187,698 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total South Korea (identified cost $158,541) | | $ | 187,698 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Thailand — 7.5% |
|
Bank of Thailand, 3.625%, 5/2/11 | | THB | | | 22,000,000 | | | $ | 675,804 | | | |
Kingdom of Thailand, 3.625%, 5/22/15 | | THB | | | 85,000,000 | | | | 2,500,333 | | | |
Kingdom of Thailand, 5.125%, 3/13/18 | | THB | | | 121,500,000 | | | | 3,868,331 | | | |
Kingdom of Thailand, 5.67%, 3/13/28 | | THB | | | 49,000,000 | | | | 1,637,798 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Thailand (identified cost $8,631,675) | | $ | 8,682,266 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Turkey — 7.6% |
|
Turkey Government Bond, 9.00%, 5/21/14(11) | | TRY | | | 635,789 | | | $ | 504,317 | | | |
Turkey Government Bond, 10.00%, 2/15/12(12) | | TRY | | | 5,672,451 | | | | 4,241,367 | | | |
Turkey Government Bond, 12.00%, 8/14/13(13) | | TRY | | | 4,891,409 | | | | 4,112,917 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Turkey (identified cost $7,334,080) | | $ | 8,858,601 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Uruguay — 0.6% |
|
Republic of Uruguay, 5.00%, 9/14/18(14) | | UYU | | | 13,195,046 | | | $ | 653,685 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Uruguay (identified cost $570,352) | | $ | 653,685 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Foreign Government Bonds | | | | | | |
(identified cost $73,437,732) | | | | | | $ | 77,499,419 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Corporate Bonds — 0.2% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | U.S. $ Value | | | |
|
|
|
Kazakhstan — 0.2% |
|
Kazkommerts International, 7.875%, 4/7/14(15) | | USD | | | 300,000 | | | $ | 252,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Kazakhstan (identified cost $249,297) | | $ | 252,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Foreign Corporate Bonds | | | | | | |
(identified cost $249,297) | | | | | | $ | 252,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage Pass-Throughs — 17.7% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | U.S. $ Value | | | |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6.50% with maturity at 2024 | | | | $ | 5,990,464 | | | $ | 6,585,594 | | | |
7.50% with maturity at 2034 | | | | | 980,773 | | | | 1,104,379 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 7,689,973 | | | |
|
|
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2.723% with maturity at 2035(16)(17) | | | | | 1,945,334 | | | | 1,995,822 | | | |
4.419% with maturity at 2035(16) | | | | | 1,758,392 | | | | 1,829,826 | | | |
See notes to financial statements14
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | U.S. $ Value | | | |
|
|
Federal National Mortgage Association: (continued) |
5.50% with maturity at 2017 | | | | $ | 1,157,459 | | | $ | 1,232,418 | | | |
6.00% with maturity at 2032 | | | | | 1,472,003 | | | | 1,571,811 | | | |
6.50% with maturity at 2017 | | | | | 1,294,190 | | | | 1,369,639 | | | |
7.00% with various maturities to 2033 | | | | | 2,728,158 | | | | 3,027,194 | | | |
8.50% with maturity at 2032 | | | | | 1,570,277 | | | | 1,836,865 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 12,863,575 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Mortgage Pass-Throughs | | | | | | |
(identified cost $19,948,379) | | | | | | $ | 20,553,548 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency Options Purchased — 0.0% |
|
| | Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | of Contracts
| | | Strike
| | | Expiration
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Price | | | Date | | | U.S. $ Value | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Japanese Yen Put Option | | JPY | 119,000 | | | JPY | 106.91 | | | | 4/8/10 | | | $ | 873 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Currency Options Purchased | | | | | | |
(identified cost $20,625) | | | | | | | | | | $ | 873 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 15.0%
|
Foreign Government Securities — 8.5% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | U.S. $ Value | | | |
|
|
|
Egypt — 3.3% |
|
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/3/09 | | EGP | | | 3,650,000 | | | $ | 666,730 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/10/09 | | EGP | | | 200,000 | | | | 36,465 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/17/09 | | EGP | | | 3,750,000 | | | | 682,427 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/24/09 | | EGP | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 227,046 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/1/09 | | EGP | | | 1,700,000 | | | | 308,202 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/8/09 | | EGP | | | 5,900,000 | | | | 1,067,633 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 6/29/10 | | EGP | | | 1,150,000 | | | | 197,077 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 8/3/10 | | EGP | | | 850,000 | | | | 144,315 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 9/28/10 | | EGP | | | 825,000 | | | | 138,039 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 10/26/10 | | EGP | | | 1,100,000 | | | | 182,568 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 10/26/10 | | EGP | | | 875,000 | | | | 145,225 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Egypt (identified cost $3,766,449) | | $ | 3,795,727 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Iceland — 0.1% |
|
Iceland Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/16/09 | | ISK | | | 12,824,000 | | | $ | 86,441 | | | |
Iceland Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/15/10 | | ISK | | | 2,356,000 | | | | 15,542 | | | |
Iceland Treasury Note, 7.00%, 3/17/10 | | ISK | | | 8,011,000 | | | | 53,926 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Iceland (identified cost $148,342) | | $ | 155,909 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lebanon — 2.5% |
|
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/5/09 | | LBP | | | 200,000,000 | | | $ | 133,068 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/19/09 | | LBP | | | 192,000,000 | | | | 127,510 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/17/09 | | LBP | | | 104,310,000 | | | | 69,075 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/17/09 | | LBP | | | 109,800,000 | | | | 72,711 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/24/09 | | LBP | | | 165,220,000 | | | | 109,309 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/31/09 | | LBP | | | 173,330,000 | | | | 114,565 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/7/10 | | LBP | | | 168,000,000 | | | | 110,932 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/21/10 | | LBP | | | 115,000,000 | | | | 75,776 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/4/10 | | LBP | | | 229,000,000 | | | | 150,556 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/18/10 | | LBP | | | 168,000,000 | | | | 110,189 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 3/4/10 | | LBP | | | 68,000,000 | | | | 44,488 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 3/18/10 | | LBP | | | 733,150,000 | | | | 478,378 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/1/10 | | LBP | | | 365,000,000 | | | | 237,495 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/15/10 | | LBP | | | 449,000,000 | | | | 291,297 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/29/10 | | LBP | | | 770,000,000 | | | | 499,167 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 9/23/10 | | LBP | | | 184,000,000 | | | | 116,128 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 10/21/10 | | LBP | | | 334,800,000 | | | | 210,309 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Lebanon (identified cost $2,936,838) | | $ | 2,950,953 | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Korea — 0.6% |
|
Korea Monetary Stabilization Bond, 5.45%, 1/23/10 | | KRW | | | 171,410,000 | | | $ | 146,030 | | | |
Korea Monetary Stabilization Bond, 5.54%, 11/14/09 | | KRW | | | 385,730,000 | | | | 326,630 | | | |
Korea Monetary Treasury Bond, 4.75%, 12/10/09 | | KRW | | | 225,760,000 | | | | 191,466 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total South Korea (identified cost $641,197) | | $ | 664,126 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Sri Lanka — 2.0% |
|
Sri Lanka Government Bond, 15.50%, 1/15/10 | | LKR | | | 27,600,000 | | | $ | 243,471 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/6/09 | | LKR | | | 27,800,000 | | | | 241,768 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/6/09 | | LKR | | | 76,740,000 | | | | 667,384 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/8/10 | | LKR | | | 39,400,000 | | | | 337,611 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/15/10 | | LKR | | | 50,800,000 | | | | 434,557 | | | |
See notes to financial statements15
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | U.S. $ Value | | | |
|
|
Sri Lanka (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/5/10 | | LKR | | | 47,330,000 | | | $ | 402,870 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Sri Lanka (identified cost $2,320,811) | | $ | 2,327,661 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Foreign Government Securities | | | | | | |
(identified cost $9,813,637) | | | | | | $ | 9,894,376 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase Agreements(18) — 4.3% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | | | Amount
| | | | | | |
Description | | | | (000’s omitted) | | | U.S. $ Value | | | |
|
|
Barclays Bank PLC: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dated 9/16/09, with an interest rate of 0.85%, collateralized by Costa Rica Government Bond with an interest rate of 9.995%, a maturity date of 8/1/20 and a market value of $1,309,710. | | | | $ | 1,287 | | | $ | 1,286,788 | | | |
Dated 10/16/09, with an interest rate of 0.80%, collateralized by Venezuela Government Bond with an interest rate of 9.25%, a maturity date of 5/7/28 and a market value of $3,784,757. | | | | | 3,674 | | | | 3,674,422 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Repurchase Agreements | | | | | | |
(identified cost $4,961,210) | | | | | | $ | 4,961,210 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Securities — 2.2% |
|
| | | | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | | | (000’s omitted) | | | U.S. $ Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(19) | | | | $ | 2,559 | | | $ | 2,559,317 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Other Securities | | | | | | |
(identified cost $2,559,317) | | | | | | $ | 2,559,317 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | | | | | |
(identified cost $17,334,164) | | | | | | $ | 17,414,903 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Investments — 99.7% | | | | | | |
(identified cost $110,990,197) | | | | | | $ | 115,721,493 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency Options Written — 0.0% |
|
| | Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | of Contracts
| | | Strike
| | | Expiration
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Price | | | Date | | | U.S. $ Value | | | |
|
|
Japanese Yen Call Option | | | JPY 170,000 | | | JPY | 76.3 | | | | 4/8/10 | | | $ | (8,895 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Currency Options Written (Premiums received $21,790) | | $ | (8,895 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.3% | | $ | 327,265 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 116,039,863 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
BRL - Brazilian Real
CLP - Chilean Peso
COP - Colombian Peso
CRC - Costa Rican Colon
EGP - Egyptian Pound
EUR - Euro
GHS - Ghanaian Cedi
HUF - Hungarian Forint
IDR - Indonesian Rupiah
ISK - Icelandic Krona
JPY - Japanese Yen
KRW - South Korean Won
LBP - Lebanese Pound
LKR - Sri Lanka Rupee
MXN - Mexican Peso
MYR - Malaysian Ringgit
PEN - Peruvian New Sol
PLN - Polish Zloty
THB - Thai Baht
TRY - New Turkish Lira
USD - United State Dollar
UYU - Uruguayan Peso
ZAR - South African Rand
| | |
(1) | | Bond pays a 6.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the IPCA (Amplified Consumer Price Index) as determined by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. The original face is BRL 224,000 and current face is BRL 414,795. |
|
(2) | | Bond pays a 2.10% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Chilean Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is CLP 83,732,080 and the current face is CLP 83,800,640. |
|
(3) | | Bond pays a 3.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Chilean Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is CLP 481,652,430 and the current face is CLP 482,046,808. |
See notes to financial statements16
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | |
(4) | | Bond pays a 3.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Chilean Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is CLP 649,183,710 and the current face is CLP 649,715,263. |
|
(5) | | Bond pays a 5.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Chilean Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is CLP 62,821,350 and the current face is CLP 62,850,480. |
|
(6) | | Bond pays a 1.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on Development Units (Unidades de Desarrolla) as calculated by the General Superintendent of Values. The original face is CRC 72,100,000 and current face is CRC 88,329,237. |
|
(7) | | Bond pays a 1.63% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on Development Units (Unidades de Desarrolla) as calculated by the General Superintendent of Values. The original face is CRC 8,100,000 and current face is CRC 10,429,115. |
|
(8) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $1,221,326 or 1.1% of the Portfolio’s net assets. |
|
(9) | | Currently the issuer is in default with respect to interest payments. |
|
(10) | | Bond pays a 3.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Poland Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is PLN 1,315,000 and the current face is PLN 1,507,766. |
|
(11) | | Bond pays a 9.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Turkey Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is TRY 630,000 and current face is TRY 635,789. |
|
(12) | | Bond pays a 10.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Turkey Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is TRY 4,668,000 and the current face is TRY 5,672,451. |
|
(13) | | Bond pays a 12.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Turkey Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is TRY 4,634,000 and the current face is TRY 4,891,409. |
|
(14) | | Bond pays a 5.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Uruguayan inflation rate. The original face is UYU 10,440,000 and the current face is UYU 13,195,046. |
|
(15) | | Security exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, which exempts from registration securities offered and sold outside the United States. Security may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. |
|
(16) | | Adjustable rate mortgage security. Rate shown is the rate at October 31, 2009. |
| | |
(17) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover collateral requirements on open financial contracts. |
|
(18) | | Open repurchase agreement with no specific maturity date. Either party may terminate the agreement upon demand. |
|
(19) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements17
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $108,430,880) | | $ | 113,162,176 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $2,559,317) | | | 2,559,317 | | | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $296,401) | | | 288,652 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 1,541,124 | | | |
Cash held by broker for open financial futures contracts | | | 13,043 | | | |
Receivable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 332,320 | | | |
Receivable for closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 99,484 | | | |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | | 391,518 | | | |
Receivable for closed swap contracts | | | 14,741 | | | |
Receivable for closed options | | | 55,031 | | | |
Premium paid on open swap contracts | | | 43,664 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 118,501,070 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 781,535 | | | |
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 4,867 | | | |
Payable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 1,045,316 | | | |
Payable for closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 2,811 | | | |
Payable for open swap contracts | | | 450,833 | | | |
Written options outstanding, at value (premiums received, $21,790) | | | 8,895 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 63,782 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 343 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 102,825 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 2,461,207 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 116,039,863 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 112,062,297 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 3,977,566 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 116,039,863 | | | |
|
|
Statement of Operations
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest (net of foreign taxes, $146,208) | | $ | 5,247,743 | | | |
Interest allocated from affiliated investment | | | 51,499 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (33,144 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 5,266,098 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 488,695 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 3,921 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 141,571 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 58,019 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 4,154 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 696,360 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 15 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 15 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 696,345 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 4,569,753 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (2,263,906 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (5,651 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | 42,101 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | 7,162,950 | | | |
|
|
Net realized gain | | $ | 4,935,494 | | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 13,624,676 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (35,063 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | 356,383 | | | |
Written options | | | 12,895 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (1,591,135 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 12,367,756 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 17,303,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 21,873,003 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements18
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 4,569,753 | | | $ | 3,690,109 | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | 4,935,494 | | | | (3,152,077 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, written options, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contacts | | | 12,367,756 | | | | (10,955,617 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 21,873,003 | | | $ | (10,417,585 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 34,727,341 | | | $ | 26,776,677 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (1,397,348 | ) | | | (11,334,998 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | 33,329,993 | | | $ | 15,441,679 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 55,202,996 | | | $ | 5,024,094 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 60,836,867 | | | $ | 55,812,773 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 116,039,863 | | | $ | 60,836,867 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements19
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | October 31, 2007(1) | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(2) | | | 0.91 | % | | | 0.96 | % | | | 1.13 | %(3) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.70 | % | | | 5.51 | % | | | 5.25 | %(3) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 26 | % | | | 38 | % | | | 2 | %(4) | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 30.48 | % | | | (13.13 | )% | | | 10.48 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 116,040 | | | $ | 60,837 | | | $ | 55,813 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. |
|
(2) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements20
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a non-diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to seek total return. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund, Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund and Eaton Vance Medallion Strategic Income Fund held an interest of 4.6%, 84.6% and 10.7%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days and excluding most seasoned mortgage-backed securities) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Most seasoned, fixed rate 30-year mortgage-backed securities are valued through the use of the investment adviser’s matrix pricing system, which takes into account bond prices, yield differentials, anticipated prepayments and interest rates provided by dealers. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less (excluding those that are non-U.S. dollar denominated, which typically are valued by a pricing service or dealer quotes) are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Exchange-traded options are valued at the last sale price for the day of valuation as quoted on any exchange on which the option is listed or, in the absence of sales on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore as reported by the Options Price Reporting Authority. Over-the-counter options (including options on securities, indices and foreign currencies) are valued by a third party pricing service using techniques that consider factors including the value of the underlying instrument, the volatility of the underlying instrument and the period of time until option expiration. Financial futures contracts are valued at the settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of the average bid and average asked prices that are reported by currency dealers to a third party pricing service at the valuation time. Such third party pricing service valuations are supplied for specific settlement periods and the Portfolio’s forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at an interpolated rate between the closest preceding and subsequent settlement period reported by the third party pricing service. Interest rate swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. Such pricing service valuations are based on the present value of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value using swap quotations provided by electronic data services or by broker/dealers. Credit default swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. The pricing services employ electronic data processing techniques to determine the present value based on credit spread quotations obtained from broker/dealers and expected default recovery rates determined by the pricing service using proprietary models. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
21
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities in the same manner as debt obligations described above.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed since the start of business on June 27, 2007 to October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
I Financial Futures Contracts — The Portfolio may enter into financial futures contracts. The Portfolio’s investment in financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against changes in interest rates or as a substitute for the purchase of securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the Portfolio is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Portfolio each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the
22
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Portfolio. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Portfolio may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.
J Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts — The Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. The Portfolio enters into forward contracts for hedging purposes as well as non-hedging purposes. The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any gains or losses are recorded as unrealized until such time as the contracts have been closed or offset by another contract with the same broker for the same settlement date and currency. Risks may arise upon entering these contracts from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts and from movements in the value of a foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar.
K Written Options — Upon the writing of a call or a put option, the premium received by the Portfolio is included in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability. The amount of the liability is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current market value of the option written, in accordance with the Portfolio’s policies on investment valuations discussed above. Premiums received from writing options which expire are treated as realized gains. Premiums received from writing options which are exercised or are closed are added to or offset against the proceeds or amount paid on the transaction to determine the realized gain or loss. If a put option on a security is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the securities purchased by the Portfolio. The Portfolio, as a writer of an option, may have no control over whether the underlying securities or other assets may be sold (call) or purchased (put) and, as a result, bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the securities or other assets underlying the written option. The Portfolio may also bear the risk of not being able to enter into a closing transaction if a liquid secondary market does not exist.
L Purchased Options — Upon the purchase of a call or put option, the premium paid by the Portfolio is included in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as an investment. The amount of the investment is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current market value of the option purchased, in accordance with the Portfolio’s policies on investment valuations discussed above. If an option which the Portfolio had purchased expires on the stipulated expiration date, the Portfolio will realize a loss in the amount of the cost of the option. If the Portfolio enters into a closing sale transaction, the Portfolio will realize a gain or loss, depending on whether the sales proceeds from the closing sale transaction are greater or less than the cost of the option. If the Portfolio exercises a put option, it will realize a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security, and the proceeds from such sale will be decreased by the premium originally paid. If the Portfolio exercises a call option, the cost of the security which the Portfolio purchases upon exercise will be increased by the premium originally paid.
M Interest Rate Swaps — The Portfolio may enter into interest rate swap agreements to enhance return, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates, or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities. Pursuant to these agreements, the Portfolio either makes floating-rate payments based on a benchmark interest rate in exchange for fixed-rate payments or the Portfolio makes fixed-rate payments in exchange for payments on a floating benchmark interest rate. Payments received or made are recorded as realized gains or losses. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between two rates of interest. The Portfolio is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from movements in interest rates.
N Cross-Currency Swaps — Cross-currency swaps are interest rate swaps in which interest cash flows are exchanged between two parties based on the notional amounts of two different currencies. The notional amounts are typically determined based on the spot exchange rates at the inception of the trade. Cross-currency swaps also involve the exchange of the notional amounts at the start of the contract at the current spot rate with an agreement to re-exchange such amounts at a later date at either the same exchange rate, a specified rate or the then current spot rate. The entire principal value of a cross-currency swap is subject to the risk that the counterparty to the swap will default on its contractual delivery obligations.
23
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
O Credit Default Swaps — When the Portfolio is the buyer of a credit default swap contract, the Portfolio is entitled to receive the par (or other agreed-upon) value of a referenced debt obligation (or basket of debt obligations) from the counterparty to the contract if a credit event by a third party, such as a U.S. or foreign corporate issuer or sovereign issuer, on the debt obligation occurs. In return, the Portfolio pays the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no credit event has occurred. If no credit event occurs, the Portfolio would have spent the stream of payments and received no benefits from the contract. When the Portfolio is the seller of a credit default swap contract, it receives the stream of payments, but is obligated to pay to the buyer of the protection an amount up to the notional amount of the swap and in certain instances take delivery of securities of the reference entity upon the occurrence of a credit event, as defined under the terms of that particular swap agreement. Credit events are contract specific but may include bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration and repudiation/moratorium. If the Portfolio is a seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Portfolio could be required to make would be an amount equal to the notional amount of the agreement. This potential amount would be partially offset by any recovery value of the respective referenced obligation, or net amount received from the settlement of a buy protection credit default swap agreement entered into by the Portfolio for the same referenced obligation. As the seller, the Portfolio effectively adds leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, the Portfolio is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. The interest fee paid or received on the swap contract, which is based on a specified interest rate on a fixed notional amount, is accrued daily as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and is recorded as realized gain upon receipt or realized loss upon payment. The Portfolio also records an increase or decrease to unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in an amount equal to the daily valuation. Upfront payments or receipts, if any, are recorded as other assets or other liabilities, respectively, and amortized over the life of the swap contract as realized gains or losses. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to the notional amount of the credit default swaps of which it is the seller. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to any unrealized depreciation of the credit default swaps of which it is the buyer, marked to market on a daily basis. These transactions involve certain risks, including the risk that the seller may be unable to fulfill the transaction.
P Total Return Swaps — In a total return swap, the Portfolio makes payments at a rate equal to a predetermined spread to the one or three-month LIBOR. In exchange, the Portfolio receives payments based on the rate of return of a benchmark industry index or basket of securities. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains and losses. Periodic payments received or made are recorded as realized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between the rate of interest and the benchmark industry index or basket of securities. The Portfolio is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from the unanticipated movements in value of interest rates, securities, or the index.
Q Repurchase Agreements — The Portfolio may enter into repurchase agreements with banks and broker-dealers determined to be creditworthy by the Portfolio’s investment adviser. Under a repurchase agreement, the Portfolio buys a security at one price and simultaneously promises to sell that same security back to the seller at a higher price for settlement at a later date. At the time the Portfolio enters into a repurchase agreement, it typically receives collateral at least equal to the repurchase price. Repurchase agreements are maked-to-market daily. In the event of bankruptcy of the counterparty or a third party custodian, the Portfolio might experience delays in recovering its cash or experience a loss.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.65% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $1 billion and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee
24
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
totaled $520,158 of which $31,463 was allocated from Cash Management and $488,695 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations and including maturities and paydowns, for the year ended October 31, 2009 were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Purchases | | | | | | |
|
|
Investments (non-U.S. Government) | | $ | 41,672,574 | | | |
U.S. Government and Agency Securities | | | 11,967,496 | | | |
|
|
| | $ | 53,640,070 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Sales | | | | | | |
|
|
Investments (non-U.S. Government) | | $ | 14,691,028 | | | |
U.S. Government and Agency Securities | | | 3,097,256 | | | |
|
|
| | $ | 17,788,284 | | | |
|
|
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 111,619,837 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 5,590,687 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (1,489,031 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 4,101,656 | | | |
|
|
The net unrealized depreciation on foreign currency, forward foreign currency exchange contracts and swap contracts at October 31, 2009 on a federal income tax basis was $1,256,920.
5 Financial Instruments
The Portfolio may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include written options, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, financial futures contracts and swap contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Portfolio has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered. A summary of written call options at October 31, 2009 is included in the Portfolio of Investments.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at October 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
|
Sales |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | Deliver | | In Exchange For | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
11/6/09 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 27,800,000 | | United States Dollar 237,871 | | $ | (4,189 | ) | | |
11/6/09 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 76,740,000 | | United States Dollar 659,278 | | | (8,912 | ) | | |
11/19/09 | | Malaysian Ringgit 1,993,000 | | United States Dollar 588,635 | | | 4,834 | | | |
11/27/09 | | Thai Baht 84,236,000 | | United States Dollar 2,515,258 | | | (3,686 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Euro 643,000 | | United States Dollar 947,698 | | | 1,485 | | | |
1/8/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 11,600,000 | | United States Dollar 98,388 | | | (1,926 | ) | | |
1/8/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 27,800,000 | | United States Dollar 235,693 | | | (4,715 | ) | | |
1/15/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 16,000,000 | | United States Dollar 135,766 | | | (2,522 | ) | | |
1/15/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 29,739,000 | | United States Dollar 252,947 | | | (4,086 | ) | | |
1/15/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 34,800,000 | | United States Dollar 295,416 | | | (5,360 | ) | | |
2/5/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 47,330,000 | | United States Dollar 403,323 | | | (5,086 | ) | | |
7/20/10 | | Kazakhstan Tenge 36,814,800 | | United States Dollar 225,858 | | | (15,776 | ) | | |
7/21/10 | | Kazakhstan Tenge 36,865,500 | | United States Dollar 227,565 | | | (14,380 | ) | | |
7/23/10 | | Kazakhstan Tenge 38,380,000 | | United States Dollar 236,549 | | | (15,291 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | (79,610 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
25
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts (continued) |
|
Purchases |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | In Exchange For | | Deliver | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
11/4/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 2,095,000,000 | | United States Dollar 203,715 | | $ | 15,619 | | | |
11/5/09 | | Mexican Peso 12,486,000 | | United States Dollar 964,334 | | | (18,817 | ) | | |
11/5/09 | | Polish Zloty 580,000 | | Euro 136,392 | | | (265 | ) | | |
11/5/09 | | Polish Zloty 6,555,900 | | Euro 1,544,200 | | | (6,714 | ) | | |
11/5/09 | | Russian Ruble 74,580,000 | | United States Dollar 2,547,566 | | | 6,753 | | | |
11/5/09 | | Russian Ruble 6,141,000 | | United States Dollar 211,613 | | | (1,287 | ) | | |
11/6/09 | | Mexican Peso 85,314,691 | | United States Dollar 6,404,526 | | | 55,185 | | | |
11/6/09 | | Polish Zloty 515,600 | | United States Dollar 185,561 | | | (7,376 | ) | | |
11/6/09 | | Polish Zloty 18,714,350 | | United States Dollar 6,642,065 | | | (174,624 | ) | | |
11/9/09 | | Hungarian Forint 359,452,750 | | United States Dollar 2,024,060 | | | (100,946 | ) | | |
11/9/09 | | Indian Rupee 14,680,000 | | United States Dollar 310,688 | | | 1,819 | | | |
11/9/09 | | Indian Rupee 13,460,000 | | United States Dollar 288,470 | | | (1,934 | ) | | |
11/10/09 | | Indian Rupee 21,900,300 | | United States Dollar 448,685 | | | 17,511 | | | |
11/10/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 4,560,580,000 | | United States Dollar 450,116 | | | 26,848 | | | |
11/12/09 | | Russian Ruble 16,100,000 | | United States Dollar 549,301 | | | 1,184 | | | |
11/12/09 | | Russian Ruble 10,200,000 | | United States Dollar 348,034 | | | 720 | | | |
11/13/09 | | Australian Dollar 298,900 | | United States Dollar 268,612 | | | 191 | | | |
11/13/09 | | Euro 879,333 | | United States Dollar 1,292,559 | | | 1,484 | | | |
11/13/09 | | South Korean Won 357,300,000 | | United States Dollar 306,065 | | | (3,883 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | Indian Rupee 11,853,000 | | United States Dollar 244,392 | | | 7,871 | | | |
11/16/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 10,936,400,000 | | United States Dollar 1,149,989 | | | (7,409 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | Swedish Krona 1,910,000 | | Euro 185,094 | | | (3,062 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | New Turkish Lira 380,000 | | United States Dollar 258,820 | | | (6,665 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | New Turkish Lira 7,879,739 | | United States Dollar 5,371,328 | | | (142,593 | ) | | |
11/19/09 | | Malaysian Ringgit 2,777,000 | | United States Dollar 828,584 | | | (15,129 | ) | | |
11/19/09 | | Norwegian Krone 650,000 | | Euro 78,254 | | | (1,707 | ) | | |
11/19/09 | | Zambian Kwacha 425,300,000 | | United States Dollar 91,897 | | | (453 | ) | | |
11/20/09 | | Malaysian Ringgit 1,660,000 | | United States Dollar 494,489 | | | (8,244 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | Colombian Peso 3,708,271,275 | | United States Dollar 1,945,833 | | | (95,090 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | Mexican Peso 14,573,000 | | United States Dollar 1,124,156 | | | (23,188 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | Norwegian Krone 3,872,300 | | Euro 462,640 | | | (5,039 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | South African Rand 1,530,000 | | United States Dollar 204,271 | | | (9,097 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | South African Rand 18,925,167 | | United States Dollar 2,555,038 | | | (140,847 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | South African Rand 19,613,086 | | United States Dollar 2,648,627 | | | (146,682 | ) | | |
11/25/09 | | Indian Rupee 9,100,000 | | United States Dollar 189,465 | | | 4,145 | | | |
11/27/09 | | Thai Baht 171,664,700 | | United States Dollar 5,125,850 | | | 7,511 | | | |
11/27/09 | | Thai Baht 10,840,000 | | United States Dollar 323,630 | | | 523 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Australian Dollar 287,700 | | United States Dollar 264,851 | | | (6,530 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 8,674,000,000 | | United States Dollar 894,873 | | | 9,140 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 2,795,000,000 | | United States Dollar 293,654 | | | (2,357 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Norwegian Krone 2,000,000 | | Euro 239,846 | | | (4,008 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Serbian Dinar 17,000,000 | | Euro 180,659 | | | (31 | ) | | |
12/2/09 | | Brazilian Real 7,028,000 | | United States Dollar 3,976,913 | | | (10,370 | ) | | |
12/4/09 | | Indian Rupee 4,010,000 | | United States Dollar 85,319 | | | (30 | ) | | |
12/11/09 | | Zambian Kwacha 507,200,000 | | United States Dollar 95,249 | | | 13,250 | | | |
12/21/09 | | Indian Rupee 8,800,000 | | United States Dollar 192,224 | | | (5,161 | ) | | |
12/21/09 | | Zambian Kwacha 590,000,000 | | United States Dollar 109,259 | | | 16,620 | | | |
1/14/10 | | Indian Rupee 26,430,000 | | United States Dollar 570,596 | | | (9,231 | ) | | |
26
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts (continued) |
|
Purchases |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | In Exchange For | | Deliver | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
1/21/10 | | Serbian Dinar 21,500,000 | | Euro 226,197 | | $ | (618 | ) | | |
1/27/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 1,046,823,800 | | United States Dollar 192,502 | | | 28,817 | | | |
4/13/10 | | Ghanaian Cedi 188,250 | | United States Dollar 118,583 | | | 4,188 | | | |
5/26/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 581,200,000 | | United States Dollar 98,242 | | | 19,675 | | | |
5/27/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 540,750,000 | | United States Dollar 91,250 | | | 18,425 | | | |
7/20/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 2,269,900 | | United States Dollar 225,861 | | | 16,094 | | | |
7/21/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 2,253,200 | | United States Dollar 227,596 | | | 12,453 | | | |
7/23/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 2,355,400 | | United States Dollar 237,919 | | | 12,757 | | | |
9/3/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 750,000 | | United States Dollar 66,964 | | | 11,285 | | | |
9/28/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 417,900,000 | | United States Dollar 79,373 | | | 2,003 | | | |
6/15/11 | | Yuan Renminbi 3,800,000 | | United States Dollar 574,887 | | | 9,592 | | | |
6/15/11 | | Yuan Renminbi 1,800,000 | | United States Dollar 272,521 | | | 4,338 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | (633,386 | ) | | |
|
|
At October 31, 2009, closed forward foreign currency purchases and sales contracts excluded above amounted to a receivable of $99,484 and a payable of $2,811.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
Expiration
| | | | | | Aggregate
| | | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Date | | Contracts | | Position | | Cost | | | Value | | | Depreciation | | | |
|
12/09 | | 2 Euro-Bobl | | Short | | $ | (339,148 | ) | | $ | (340,305 | ) | | $ | (1,157 | ) | | |
12/09 | | 2 Euro-Bund | | Short | | | (357,006 | ) | | | (358,789 | ) | | | (1,783 | ) | | |
12/09 | | 4 U.S. 5 Year Treasury Note | | Short | | | (463,861 | ) | | | (465,812 | ) | | | (1,951 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (4,891 | ) | | |
|
|
Euro-Bobl: Medium-term debt securities issued by the Federal Republic of Germany with a remaining term to maturity of 4.5 to 5 years.
Euro-Bund: Long-term debt securities issued by the Federal Republic of Germany with a remaining term to maturity of 8.5 to 10.5 years.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
| | | | Portfolio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Notional
| | Pays/
| | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
| | Amount
| | Receives
| | Floating
| | Annual
| | | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | (000’s
| | Floating
| | Rate
| | Fixed
| | | Termination
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
Counterparty | | omitted) | | Rate | | Index | | Rate | | | Date | | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
Barclays Bank PLC | | PLN 8,000 | | Pay | | 3-month PLN WIBOR | | | 5.42 | % | | | 6/01/14 | | | $ | (10,756 | ) | | |
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets | | MXN 50,000 | | Pay | | Mexican Interbank Deposit Rate | | | 9.08 | | | | 8/06/13 | | | | 259,900 | | | |
|
|
Credit Suisse | | PLN 10,000 | | Pay | | 3-month PLN WIBOR | | | 5.17 | | | | 6/15/12 | | | | (3,628 | ) | | |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank | | BRL 4,252 | | Pay | | Brazil Interbank Deposit Rate | | | 9.67 | | | | 1/03/11 | | | | (14,326 | ) | | |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank | | ZAR 36,500 | | Pay | | 3-month JIBOR | | | 9.05 | | | | 10/12/15 | | | | 87,748 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 318,938 | | | |
|
|
BRL - Brazilian Real
MXN - Mexican Peso
PLN - Polish Zloty
ZAR - South African Rand
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swaps — Sell Protection |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | Current
| | | | | | |
| | | | Notional
| | Contract
| | | | | Market
| | | Net
| | | |
| | | | Amount*
| | Annual
| | | | | Annual
| | | Unrealized
| | | |
Reference
| | | | (000’s
| | Fixed
| | Termination
| | | Fixed
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
Entity | | Counterparty | | omitted) | | Rate** | | Date | | | Rate*** | | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
Brazil | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | $ | 300 | | 5.25% | | | 11/20/09 | | | | 0.36 | % | | $ | 8,034 | | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 500 | | 1.75 | | | 3/20/18 | | | | 3.22 | | | | (45,489 | ) | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 100 | | 1.90 | | | 3/20/18 | | | | 3.22 | | | | (8,130 | ) | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 200 | | 2.10 | | | 3/20/23 | | | | 3.07 | | | | (15,970 | ) | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 200 | | 2.45 | | | 3/20/23 | | | | 3.07 | | | | (9,941 | ) | | |
|
|
Kazakhstan | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 300 | | 9.75 | | | 11/20/09 | | | | 0.82 | | | | 14,894 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (56,602 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swaps — Buy Protection |
|
| | | | Notional
| | | Contract
| | | | | Net
| | | |
| | | | Amount
| | | Annual
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Reference
| | | | (000’s
| | | Fixed
| | Termination
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
Entity | | Counterparty | | omitted) | | | Rate** | | Date | | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
Austria | | Barclays Bank PLC | | $ | 300 | | | 0.44% | | | 12/20/13 | | | $ | 755 | | | |
|
|
Austria | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 200 | | | 1.42 | | | 3/20/14 | | | | (7,776 | ) | | |
|
|
Brazil | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 450 | | | 1.65 | | | 9/20/19 | | | | (3,355 | ) | | |
|
|
Lebanon | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 250 | | | 3.30 | | | 9/20/14 | | | | (8,193 | ) | | |
|
|
Lebanon | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 200 | | | 1.00(1) | | | 12/20/14 | | | | (1,588 | ) | | |
|
|
Malaysia | | Bank of America | | | 200 | | | 0.83 | | | 12/20/14 | | | | 1,092 | | | |
|
|
Malaysia | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 300 | | | 2.40 | | | 3/20/14 | | | | (20,251 | ) | | |
|
|
Malaysia | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 400 | | | 0.82 | | | 12/20/14 | | | | 2,333 | | | |
|
|
Malaysia | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 300 | | | 2.45 | | | 3/20/14 | | | | (20,898 | ) | | |
|
|
27
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swaps — Buy Protection (continued) |
|
| | | | Notional
| | | Contract
| | | | | Net
| | | |
| | | | Amount
| | | Annual
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Reference
| | | | (000’s
| | | Fixed
| | Termination
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
Entity | | Counterparty | | omitted) | | | Rate** | | Date | | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
Philippines | | Barclays Bank PLC | | $ | 300 | | | 1.84% | | | 12/20/14 | | | $ | (890 | ) | | |
|
|
Philippines | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 200 | | | 1.84 | | | 12/20/14 | | | | (593 | ) | | |
|
|
South Africa | | Bank of America | | | 300 | | | 1.00(1) | | | 12/20/19 | | | | (573 | ) | | |
|
|
South Africa | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 300 | | | 1.00(1) | | | 12/20/19 | | | | (2,688 | ) | | |
|
|
Thailand | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 400 | | | 0.97 | | | 9/20/19 | | | | 6,605 | | | |
|
|
Thailand | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 400 | | | 0.86 | | | 12/20/14 | | | | 4,415 | | | |
|
|
Thailand | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 200 | | | 0.95 | | | 9/20/19 | | | | 3,631 | | | |
|
|
Thailand | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 200 | | | 0.87 | | | 12/20/14 | | | | 2,111 | | | |
|
|
Turkey | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 1,190 | | | 2.12 | | | 1/20/13 | | | | (30,123 | ) | | |
|
|
Turkey | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 430 | | | 2.93 | | | 9/20/19 | | | | (27,509 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (103,495 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | If the Portfolio is the seller of credit protection, the notional amount is the maximum potential amount of future payments the Portfolio could be required to make if a credit event, as defined in the credit default swap agreement, were to occur. At October 31, 2009, such maximum potential amount for all open credit default swaps in which the Portfolio is the seller was $1,600,000. |
|
** | | The contract annual fixed rate represents the fixed rate of interest received by the Portfolio (as a seller of protection) or paid by the Portfolio (as a buyer of protection) annually on the notional amount of the credit default swap contract. |
|
*** | | Current market annual fixed rates, utilized in determining the net unrealized appreciation or depreciation as of period end, serve as an indicator of the market’s perception of the current status of the payment/performance risk associated with the credit derivative. The current market annual fixed rate of a particular reference entity reflects the cost, as quoted by the pricing vendor, of selling protection against default of that entity as of period end and may include upfront payments required to be made to enter into the agreement. The higher the fixed rate, the greater the market perceived risk of a credit event involving the reference entity. A rate identified as “Defaulted” indicates a credit event has occurred for the reference entity. |
|
(1) | | Upfront payment is exchanged with the counterparty as a result of the standardized trading coupon. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return Swaps |
|
| | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | | | | |
| | Notional
| | Expiration
| | | | | | Unrealized
| | | | | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | Date | | Portfolio Pays | | Portfolio Receives | | Depreciation | | | | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank | | $184,151 | | 8/25/10 | | 1-month USD- LIBOR- BBA+50bp | | Total Return on JPMorgan Abu Dhabi Index | | $ | (5,990 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | $ | (5,990 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cross-Currency Swaps |
|
| | Notional
| | Notional
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | Amount
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | on Fixed
| | on Floating
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rate
| | Rate
| | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
| | (Currency
| | (Currency
| | Floating
| | Fixed
| | | Termination
| | | Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Received) | | Delivered) | | Rate | | Rate | | | Date | | | Depreciation | | | |
|
Citigroup Global Markets | | TRY 169,736 | | $105,035 | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 11.95 | % | | | 2/15/12 | | | $ | (23,605 | ) | | |
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets | | TRY 339,968 | | $205,047 | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 12.10 | | | | 2/15/12 | | | | (53,202 | ) | | |
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets | | TRY 500,316 | | $297,807 | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 12.46 | | | | 8/14/13 | | | | (68,098 | ) | | |
|
|
Credit Suisse | | TRY 258,962 | | $149,603 | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 12.45 | | | | 2/15/12 | | | | (47,535 | ) | | |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank | | TRY 685,893 | | $463,128 | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 11.20 | | | | 5/21/14 | | | | (19,726 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (212,166 | ) | | |
|
|
TRY - New Turkish Lira
The Portfolio pays interest on the currency received and receives interest on the currency delivered. At the termination date, the notional amount of the currency received will be exchanged for the notional amount of the currency delivered.
Written currency call options activity for the year ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal Amount of
| | | | | | |
| | Contracts
| | | Premiums
| | | |
| | (000’s omitted) | | | Received | | | |
|
Outstanding, beginning of year | | | — | | | $ | — | | | |
Options written | | | JPY 170,000 | | | | 21,790 | | | |
|
|
Outstanding, end of year | | | JPY 170,000 | | | $ | 21,790 | | | |
|
|
JPY - Japanese Yen
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815-10), effective May 1, 2009. Such standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. The disclosure below includes additional information as a result of implementing FAS 161.
28
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
In the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives, the Portfolio is subject to the following risks:
Credit Risk: The Portfolio may enter into credit default swap contracts to manage its credit risk, to gain exposure to a credit in which the Portfolio may otherwise invest, or to enhance return.
Equity Risk: The Portfolio may enter into total return swap agreements on a security, basket of securities or an index to enhance return, to change the duration of the overall portfolio, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities.
Foreign Exchange Risk: The Portfolio holds foreign currency denominated investments. The value of these investments and related receivables and payables may change due to future changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To hedge against this risk, the Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The Portfolio may also enter into such contracts to hedge the currency risk of investments it anticipates purchasing. The Portfolio may also purchase or write currency option contracts to enhance return.
Interest Rate Risk: The Portfolio holds fixed-rate bonds. The value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. To hedge against this risk, the Portfolio may enter into interest rate and cross-currency swap contracts. The Portfolio may also purchase and sell U.S. Treasury and foreign debt futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
The Portfolio enters into swap contracts and forward foreign currency exchange contracts that may contain provisions whereby the counterparty may terminate the contract under certain conditions, including but not limited to a decline in the Portfolio’s net assets below a certain level over a certain period of time, which would trigger a payment by the Portfolio for those derivatives in a liability position. At October 31, 2009, the fair value of derivatives with credit-related contingent features in a net liability position was $651,473. The aggregate fair value of assets pledged as collateral by the Portfolio for such liability was $465,692 at October 31, 2009.
The non-exchange traded derivatives in which the Portfolio invests, including swap contracts, over-the-counter options and forward foreign currency exchange contracts, are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the contract fails to perform its obligations under the contract. The Portfolio is not subject to counterparty credit risk with respect to its written options as the Portfolio, not the counterparty is obligated to perform under such derivatives. At October 31, 2009, the maximum amount of loss the Portfolio would incur due to counterparty risk was $824,195, representing the fair value of such derivatives in an asset position. Such amount would be increased by any unamortized upfront payments made by the Portfolio. To mitigate this risk, the Portfolio has entered into master netting agreements with substantially all its derivative counterparties, which allows it and a counterparty to aggregate amounts owed by each of them for derivative transactions under the agreement into a single net amount payable by either the Portfolio or the counterparty. At October 31, 2009, the maximum amount of loss the Portfolio would incur due to counterparty risk would be reduced by approximately $491,000 due to master netting agreements. Counterparties may be required to pledge collateral in the form of cash, U.S. Government securities or highly-rated bonds for the benefit of the Portfolio if the net amount due from the counterparty with respect to a derivative contract exceeds a certain threshold. The amount of collateral posted by the counterparties with respect to such contracts would also reduce the amount of any loss incurred.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) by risk exposure at October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value | |
| | | |
Statement of Assets and
| | | | | | | | Foreign
| | | Interest
| |
Liabilities Caption | | Credit | | | Equity | | | Exchange | | | Rate | |
| |
Unaffiliated investments, at value | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 873 | | | $ | — | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Receivable for open and closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | 431,804 | | | | — | |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | | 43,870 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 347,648 | |
|
|
Total Asset Derivatives | | $ | 43,870 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 432,677 | | | $ | 347,648 | |
|
|
Written options outstanding, at value | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (8,895 | ) | | $ | — | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,891 | )* |
Payable for open and closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,048,127 | ) | | | — | |
Payable for open swap contracts | | | (203,967 | ) | | | (5,990 | ) | | | — | | | | (240,876 | ) |
|
|
Total Liability Derivatives | | $ | (203,967 | ) | | $ | (5,990 | ) | | $ | (1,057,022 | ) | | $ | (245,767 | ) |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount represents cumulative unrealized appreciation or (depreciation) on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) by risk exposure for the six months ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
29
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Foreign
| | | Interest
| | | |
Statement of Operations Caption | | Credit | | | Equity | | | Exchange | | | Rate | | | |
|
Net realized gain (loss) – | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (62,516 | ) | | |
Written options | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Swap contracts | | | (16,456 | ) | | | 49,239 | | | | — | | | | 124,652 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,634,119 | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | (16,456 | ) | | $ | 49,239 | | | $ | 5,634,119 | | | $ | 62,136 | | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (14,572 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,622 | | | |
Written options | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,342 | | | | — | | | |
Swap contracts | | | 197,504 | | | | 4,221 | | | | — | | | | (268,369 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | (827,994 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 197,504 | | | $ | 4,221 | | | $ | (831,244 | ) | | $ | (259,747 | ) | | |
|
|
The average notional amounts of futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts and swap contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009, which are indicative of the volume of these derivative types, were approximately $2,892,000, $62,879,000 and $23,079,000, respectively. The average principal amount of purchased option contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009 was approximately $1,268,000.
6 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
7 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by entities whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Portfolio, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign securities markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
8 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
30
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Foreign Government Bonds | | $ | — | | | $ | 77,499,419 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 77,499,419 | | | |
Foreign Corporate Bonds | | | — | | | | 252,750 | | | | — | | | | 252,750 | | | |
Mortgage Pass-Throughs | | | — | | | | 20,553,548 | | | | — | | | | 20,553,548 | | | |
Currency Options Purchased | | | — | | | | 873 | | | | — | | | | 873 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 2,559,317 | | | | 14,855,586 | | | | — | | | | 17,414,903 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 2,559,317 | | | $ | 113,162,176 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 115,721,493 | | | |
|
|
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | $ | — | | | $ | 431,804 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 431,804 | | | |
Swap Contracts | | | — | | | | 391,518 | | | | — | | | | 391,518 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 2,559,317 | | | $ | 113,985,498 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 116,544,815 | | | |
|
|
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Currency Options Written | | $ | — | | | $ | (8,895 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (8,895 | ) | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | | — | | | | (1,048,127 | ) | | | — | | | | (1,048,127 | ) | | |
Swap Contracts | | | — | | | | (450,833 | ) | | | — | | | | (450,833 | ) | | |
Futures Contracts | | | (4,891 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,891 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | (4,891 | ) | | $ | (1,507,855 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,512,746 | ) | | |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investments
| | | Investments
| | | | | | |
| | in Foreign
| | | in Short-
| | | | | | |
| | Government
| | | Term
| | | | | | |
| | Bonds | | | Investments | | | Total | | | |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 | | $ | 356,884 | | | $ | 203,327 | | | $ | 560,211 | | | |
Realized gains (losses) | | | — | | | | (31,336 | ) | | | (31,336 | ) | | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) * | | | (53,230 | ) | | | 9,090 | | | | (44,140 | ) | | |
Net purchases (sales) | | | — | | | | (181,081 | ) | | | (181,081 | ) | | |
Accrued discount (premium) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Net transfers to (from) Level 3 | | | (303,654 | ) | | | — | | | | (303,654 | ) | | |
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments still held as of October 31, 2009* | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount is included in the related amount on investments in the Statement of Operations. |
9 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 23, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
31
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of Emerging
Markets Local Income Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the two years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the two years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 23, 2009
32
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited)
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
The Fund held a joint Special Meeting of Shareholders on October 23, 2009 (adjourned from September 25, 2009) to approve an amendment to the current fundamental investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale of physical commodities and commodities contracts to provide that the Fund may invest in all types of commodities, commodities contracts and commodities related investments to the extent permitted by law. The following action was taken by the shareholders:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares
| | | | | | |
For | | Against | | | Abstain | | | |
|
|
214,295 | | | 1,520 | | | | 690 | | | |
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio
The Portfolio held a joint Special Meeting of Interestholders on October 23, 2009 (adjourned from September 25, 2009) to approve an amendment to the current fundamental investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale of physical commodities and commodities contracts to provide that the Portfolio may invest in all types of commodities, commodities contracts and commodities related investments to the extent permitted by law. The following action was taken by the interestholders:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Interest in the Portfolio
| | | | | | |
For | | Against | | | Abstain | | | |
|
78% | | | 5 | % | | | 7 | % | | |
Results are rounded to the nearest whole number.
33
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
34
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”), as well as the terms of the investment advisory agreement for Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio, the portfolio in which the Fund invests (the “Portfolio”), with Boston Management and Research (“BMR”), an affiliate of EVM (EVM, with respect to the Fund, and BMR, with respect to the Portfolio, are each referred to herein as the “Adviser”), including the fee structure of each agreement, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreements. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreements. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve the investment advisory agreements for the Fund and the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreements of the Fund and the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by EVM and the Portfolio by BMR.
The Board considered EVM’s and BMR’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments to be held by the Fund and the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio and the Fund, including recent changes to such personnel. The Board specifically noted EVM’s and BMR’s expertise with respect to emerging markets and in-house research capabilities. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund and Portfolio by senior management. The Board noted that under the terms of the investment advisory agreement of the Fund, EVM may invest assets of the Fund directly in securities, for which it would receive a fee, or in the Portfolio, for which it receives no separate fee but for which BMR receives an advisory fee from the Portfolio. The Trustees considered the potential benefits to the Fund of the ability to make direct investments, such as an improved ability to: manage the Fund’s duration, or other general market exposures, using certain derivatives; add exposure to specific market sectors or asset classes without changing the Portfolio’s investments, which would affect any other fund investing in the Portfolio; hedge some of the general market risks of the Portfolio while retaining the value added by the individual manager; and hedge a portion of the exposures of the Portfolio while retaining others (e.g., hedging the U.S. government exposure of the Portfolio while retaining its exposure to high-grade corporate bonds).
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
35
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by EVM and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreements.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-year period ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates to be paid by the Fund directly or indirectly through its pro rata share of the expenses of the Portfolio (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Fund’s management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered the fact that the Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses for the Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees proposed to be charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Portfolio, the Fund and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser in connection with its relationship with the Fund.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund and the Portfolio, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolio increase. The Board noted the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels both at the Fund and at the Portfolio level. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund and the Portfolio can be expected to share such benefits equitably.
36
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2003 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2003 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
37
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 1998 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee of the Portfolio since 2007 and Trustee of the Trust since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President | | Of the Trust since 2008 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President | | Of the Trust since 2008 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
38
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President | | Of the Trust since 2002 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
39
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of
Emerging Markets Local Income Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Investment Adviser and Administrator of
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income FundEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
Charles B. Gaffney
Portfolio Manager
• | | Although global equity markets began the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, on a downward trajectory, stocks bounced strongly off the bottom set in early March and staged a broad-based rally that continued through the end of the 12-month period. Last fall, on the verge of a possible collapse of the global financial system, risk-averse investors reacted by streaming to the sidelines, sending stocks into a dramatic decline. By late winter, however, fiscal and monetary interventions by governments around the world began to fuel optimism that the financial crisis would end and global economic growth might resume. |
• | | Amid prospects for a better-than-expected 2009, investor risk appetite began to return, overcoming such lingering concerns as high consumer debt levels, rising unemployment and still-depressed home prices. Corporate profits also started showing improvement, benefiting from cost-cutting and easier earnings comparisons, which further supported the equity market’s rebound. Stocks that declined the most last fall, especially those lower-quality, cyclical issues farther out on the risk spectrum, tended to be those that recovered most quickly as the rally gained steam. |
|
• | | From March through September 2009, the broad-based S&P 500 Index posted strong gains, with only a slight pull back in October ending a string of consecutive monthly gains. For the full one-year period that ended October 31, 2009, the S&P 500 posted a 9.80% return, while the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 7.76% and the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index soared 18.84%. The large-cap Russell 1000 Index returned 11.20%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index gained 6.46%.1 In terms of investment styles, growth stocks widely outperformed their counterparts in the value space. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
• | | For the year ending October 31, 2009, nine of the 10 sectors in the S&P 500 Index (the Index) registered positive absolute returns. The cyclical information technology and consumer discretionary sectors posted the strongest gains, early beneficiaries of renewed optimism that the financial crisis and economy had stabilized. Driven by an increase in infrastructure spending, the materials sector performed well, as did the consumer staples sector, as consumer confidence gradually improved. Financials was by far the worst-performing sector for the Index — the only one to record negative absolute returns. |
|
• | | The Fund posted positive returns for the year and outperformed the Index. On a sector level, financials contributed the most to the Fund’s relative performance, primarily due to an underweighting and stock selection in commercial banks. The Fund’s stock selection in multi-utilities further added to returns. Additionally, the Fund’s cash position provided a cushion in a volatile market and contributed to the Fund’s outperformance of the Index. |
Total Return Performance
10/31/08 – 10/31/09
| | | | |
Class A2 | | | 10.32 | % |
Class C2 | | | -2.08 | ** |
Class I2 | | | 10.54 | |
S&P 500 Index1 | | | 9.80 | |
Lipper Large-Cap Core Funds Average1 | | | 10.85 | |
| | |
** | | Performance since share class inception on 10/1/09. |
See page 3 for more performance information.
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
2 | | This return does not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class C shares. If the sales charge was deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. Absent a contractual expense limitation by the adviser and the administrator, the returns would be lower. |
1
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | Information technology was the worst-performing sector, with the Fund’s underexposure to stocks in the computers & peripherals industry restraining returns. Consumer discretionary investments also detracted from performance, in large part due to not owning an internet retailer that performed very well for the Index. However, selection in specialty retailers somewhat offset this underperformance. |
|
• | | Effective November 1, 2009, the Fund invests its assets in Large-Cap Core Research Portfolio (the Portfolio), an open-end investment company with the same objective and policies as the Fund. The Fund’s objective remains consistent: to achieve long-term capital appreciation by investing in a diversified portfolio of equity securities, which are selected by a team of investment research analysts. In selecting and managing the Portfolio’s holdings, the team makes investment judgments primarily on the basis of fundamental research analysis, which involves consideration of the various company-specific and general business, economic and market factors that could influence the future performance of individual companies and their stocks. |
|
• | | Mr. Gaffney serves as the portfolio manager of the Fund and is responsible for the day-to-day management of the Portfolio. He has supervised the team of research analysts since 2007. Mr. Gaffney and the team meet periodically to discuss investment policy and procedures and to provide investment research for the Portfolio. Mr. Gaffney is Director of Equity Research, manages other Eaton Vance portfolios, has been an analyst of Eaton Vance for more than five years, and is a Vice President of Eaton Vance. As portfolio manager, Mr. Gaffney coordinates the allocation of Portfolio assets among the market sectors, using the weightings of the S&P 500 as a benchmark. The various equity research analysts are responsible for choosing the particular securities within their sectors or industries. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio manager and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Fund’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
Top 10 Holdings1
By net assets
| | | | |
Microsoft Corp. | | | 3.0 | % |
Apple, Inc. | | | 2.5 | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | | | 2.5 | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | | 2.4 | |
Chevron Corp. | | | 2.2 | |
Apache Corp. | | | 2.2 | |
Pfizer, Inc. | | | 2.0 | |
Wells Fargo & Co. | | | 2.0 | |
Google, Inc., Class A | | | 1.8 | |
United Technologies Corp. | | | 1.8 | |
| | |
1 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 22.4% of the Fund’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
Sector Weightings2
By net assets
| | |
2 | | As a percentage of the Fund’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
2
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the S&P 500 Index, a broad-based, unmanaged market index of common stocks commonly used as a measure of U.S. stock market performance. Prior to August 26, 2005, the Fund was not actively marketed and had few shareholders. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A and the S&P 500 Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dae64/dae64d96db09a018b85738f84ea49f374de4161b" alt="(GRAPH)"
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 11/1/01. |
|
| | A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class C shares on 10/1/09 (commencement of operations) and Class I shares on 9/3/08 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $9,792 and $8,711, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EAERX | | ECERX | | EIERX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 10.32 | % | | | N.A. | | | | 10.54 | % |
Five Years | | | 3.48 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.17 | | | | -2.08 | % | | | -11.23 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 3.95 | % | | | N.A. | | | | 10.54 | % |
Five Years | | | 2.26 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 2.41 | | | | -3.06 | % | | | -11.23 | |
† Inception Dates: Class A: 11/1/01; Class C: 10/1/09; Class I: 9/3/08
†† Returns are cumulative since inception of the share class.
| | |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class C shares. If the sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A shares reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. Absent a contractual expense limitation by the adviser and the administrator, the returns would be lower. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class C | | Class I |
Gross Expense Ratio | | | 2.82 | % | | | 3.57 | % | | | 2.57 | % |
Net Expense Ratio | | | 1.25 | | | | 2.00 | | | | 1.00 | |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09, as supplemented 9/30/09. The net expense ratio reflects a contractual expense limitation that continues through 2/28/10. Thereafter, the expense limitation may be changed or terminated at any time. Without this expense limitation, expenses would be higher. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,187.40 | | | | $6.89 | *** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $979.20 | | | | $1.68 | *** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,188.40 | | | | $5.52 | *** | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.90 | | | | $6.36 | *** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.10 | | | | $10.16 | *** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.20 | | | | $5.09 | *** | | |
| | | |
| * | Class C had not commenced operations as of May 1, 2009. Actual expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.25% for Class A shares, 2.00% for Class C shares and 1.00% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 for Class A and Class I (to reflect the one-half year period) and by 31/365 for Class C (to reflect the period from commencement of operations on October 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009 (September 30, 2009 for Class C). | |
| | | |
| ** | Hypothetical expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.25% for Class A shares, 2.00% for Class C shares and 1.00% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009 (September 30, 2009 for Class C). | |
|
| *** | Absent an allocation of certain expenses to an affiliate, the expenses would be higher. | |
4
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 99.4% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense — 6.0% |
|
Boeing Co. (The) | | | 1,983 | | | $ | 94,787 | | | |
General Dynamics Corp. | | | 6,413 | | | | 402,095 | | | |
Lockheed Martin Corp. | | | 4,742 | | | | 326,202 | | | |
Raytheon Co. | | | 6,034 | | | | 273,220 | | | |
United Technologies Corp. | | | 7,641 | | | | 469,540 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,565,844 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Auto Components — 0.6% |
|
Johnson Controls, Inc. | | | 6,292 | | | $ | 150,505 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 150,505 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverages — 2.9% |
|
Coca-Cola Co. (The) | | | 6,695 | | | $ | 356,910 | | | |
PepsiCo, Inc. | | | 6,770 | | | | 409,924 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 766,834 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Biotechnology — 1.9% |
|
Amgen, Inc.(1) | | | 4,129 | | | $ | 221,851 | | | |
Celgene Corp.(1) | | | 2,619 | | | | 133,700 | | | |
Gilead Sciences, Inc.(1) | | | 3,410 | | | | 145,096 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 500,647 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets — 2.7% |
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | | | 2,127 | | | $ | 361,952 | | | |
Invesco, Ltd. | | | 4,221 | | | | 89,274 | | | |
Northern Trust Corp. | | | 2,066 | | | | 103,816 | | | |
State Street Corp. | | | 2,159 | | | | 90,635 | | | |
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. | | | 1,289 | | | | 62,813 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 708,490 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 2.0% |
|
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | | | 3,420 | | | $ | 263,784 | | | |
Monsanto Co. | | | 3,933 | | | | 264,219 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 528,003 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 3.3% |
|
Fifth Third Bancorp | | | 14,848 | | | $ | 132,741 | | | |
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | | | 4,341 | | | | 212,448 | | | |
Wells Fargo & Co. | | | 18,715 | | | | 515,037 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 860,226 | | | |
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies — 0.5% |
|
Waste Management, Inc. | | | 4,629 | | | $ | 138,314 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 138,314 | | | |
|
|
|
Communications Equipment — 1.6% |
|
QUALCOMM, Inc. | | | 6,846 | | | $ | 283,493 | | | |
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson ADR | | | 12,181 | | | | 126,682 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 410,175 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals — 6.0% |
|
Apple, Inc.(1) | | | 3,451 | | | $ | 650,514 | | | |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | | | 9,885 | | | | 469,142 | | | |
International Business Machines Corp. | | | 3,727 | | | | 449,513 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,569,169 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance — 0.8% |
|
American Express Co. | | | 3,896 | | | $ | 135,737 | | | |
Capital One Financial Corp. | | | 2,259 | | | | 82,679 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 218,416 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services — 4.6% |
|
Bank of America Corp. | | | 29,599 | | | $ | 431,553 | | | |
CME Group, Inc. | | | 482 | | | | 145,858 | | | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | | 14,922 | | | | 623,292 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,200,703 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 2.2% |
|
AT&T, Inc. | | | 14,340 | | | $ | 368,108 | | | |
Verizon Communications, Inc. | | | 7,249 | | | | 214,498 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 582,606 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 1.5% |
|
American Electric Power Co., Inc. | | | 7,506 | | | $ | 226,831 | | | |
FirstEnergy Corp. | | | 3,896 | | | | 168,619 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 395,450 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment — 0.3% |
|
Emerson Electric Co. | | | 2,159 | | | $ | 81,502 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 81,502 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services — 1.9% |
|
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. | | | 1,850 | | | $ | 176,213 | | | |
Halliburton Co. | | | 4,657 | | | | 136,031 | | | |
Transocean, Ltd.(1) | | | 2,139 | | | | 179,483 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 491,727 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food & Staples Retailing — 2.9% |
|
Costco Wholesale Corp. | | | 2,585 | | | $ | 146,957 | | | |
CVS Caremark Corp. | | | 6,271 | | | | 221,367 | | | |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | | | 7,728 | | | | 383,927 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 752,251 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 2.1% |
|
Kellogg Co. | | | 3,516 | | | $ | 181,215 | | | |
Nestle SA ADR | | | 6,313 | | | | 293,681 | | | |
Unilever PLC ADR | | | 2,763 | | | | 82,420 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 557,316 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 2.3% |
|
Baxter International, Inc. | | | 4,192 | | | $ | 226,619 | | | |
Boston Scientific Corp.(1) | | | 10,440 | | | | 84,773 | | | |
Covidien PLC | | | 3,163 | | | | 133,226 | | | |
St. Jude Medical, Inc.(1) | | | 2,590 | | | | 88,267 | | | |
Zimmer Holdings, Inc.(1) | | | 1,553 | | | | 81,641 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 614,526 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 0.3% |
|
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA ADR | | | 1,778 | | | $ | 85,984 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 85,984 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 1.5% |
|
Carnival Corp. | | | 3,102 | | | $ | 90,330 | | | |
Marriott International, Inc., Class A | | | 2,745 | | | | 68,790 | | | |
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 4,028 | | | | 236,081 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 395,201 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Durables — 0.8% |
|
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. | | | 3,712 | | | $ | 53,861 | | | |
Whirlpool Corp. | | | 2,036 | | | | 145,757 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 199,618 | | | |
|
|
|
Household Products — 2.4% |
|
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | | | 4,513 | | | $ | 354,857 | | | |
Procter & Gamble Co. | | | 4,855 | | | | 281,590 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 636,447 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Conglomerates — 1.2% |
|
3M Co. | | | 2,027 | | | $ | 149,127 | | | |
General Electric Co. | | | 11,870 | | | | 169,266 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 318,393 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 2.3% |
|
Lincoln National Corp. | | | 7,144 | | | $ | 170,241 | | | |
MetLife, Inc. | | | 6,701 | | | | 228,035 | | | |
Prudential Financial, Inc. | | | 4,316 | | | | 195,213 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 593,489 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Internet Software & Services — 1.8% |
|
Google, Inc., Class A(1) | | | 889 | | | $ | 476,611 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 476,611 | | | |
|
|
|
|
IT Services — 1.8% |
|
Accenture PLC, Class A | | | 1,691 | | | $ | 62,702 | | | |
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.(1) | | | 1,425 | | | | 55,076 | | | |
MasterCard, Inc., Class A | | | 994 | | | | 217,706 | | | |
Western Union Co. | | | 7,243 | | | | 131,606 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 467,090 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences Tools & Services — 0.4% |
|
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.(1) | | | 2,231 | | | $ | 100,395 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 100,395 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Machinery — 2.3% |
|
Caterpillar, Inc. | | | 2,912 | | | $ | 160,335 | | | |
Danaher Corp. | | | 1,593 | | | | 108,690 | | | |
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | | | 2,338 | | | | 107,361 | | | |
PACCAR, Inc. | | | 5,831 | | | | 218,138 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 594,524 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Media — 1.9% |
|
McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc. (The) | | | 3,431 | | | $ | 98,744 | | | |
Time Warner, Inc. | | | 2,966 | | | | 89,336 | | | |
Walt Disney Co. (The) | | | 11,196 | | | | 306,435 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 494,515 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 1.2% |
|
BHP Billiton, Ltd. ADR | | | 938 | | | $ | 61,514 | | | |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | | | 1,490 | | | | 109,306 | | | |
Nucor Corp. | | | 1,553 | | | | 61,887 | | | |
United States Steel Corp. | | | 2,216 | | | | 76,430 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 309,137 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multi-Utilities — 2.2% |
|
CMS Energy Corp. | | | 14,337 | | | $ | 190,682 | | | |
PG&E Corp. | | | 4,794 | | | | 196,027 | | | |
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. | | | 6,291 | | | | 187,472 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 574,181 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multiline Retail — 1.8% |
|
Kohl’s Corp.(1) | | | 4,824 | | | $ | 276,029 | | | |
Target Corp. | | | 4,115 | | | | 199,290 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 475,319 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 11.2% |
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. | | | 4,580 | | | $ | 279,059 | | | |
Apache Corp. | | | 6,108 | | | | 574,885 | | | |
Chevron Corp. | | | 7,611 | | | | 582,546 | | | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | | | 8,989 | | | | 644,242 | | | |
Hess Corp. | | | 5,389 | | | | 294,994 | | | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | | | 2,980 | | | | 226,122 | | | |
Southwestern Energy Co.(1) | | | 5,038 | | | | 219,556 | | | |
Total SA ADR | | | 2,094 | | | | 125,787 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,947,191 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Personal Products — 0.9% |
|
Avon Products, Inc. | | | 7,484 | | | $ | 239,862 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 239,862 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals — 6.1% |
|
Abbott Laboratories | | | 7,522 | | | $ | 380,388 | | | |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | | | 6,134 | | | | 133,721 | | | |
Merck & Co., Inc. | | | 9,940 | | | | 307,444 | | | |
Pfizer, Inc. | | | 31,551 | | | | 537,313 | | | |
Shire PLC ADR | | | 1,922 | | | | 102,443 | | | |
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. ADR | | | 2,627 | | | | 132,611 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,593,920 | | | |
|
|
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) — 1.2% |
|
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. | | | 1,174 | | | $ | 80,748 | | | |
Boston Properties, Inc. | | | 1,180 | | | | 71,708 | | | |
Equity Residential | | | 2,847 | | | | 82,221 | | | |
Vornado Realty Trust | | | 1,289 | | | | 76,773 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 311,450 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 3.8% |
|
Analog Devices, Inc. | | | 5,118 | | | $ | 131,174 | | | |
Applied Materials, Inc. | | | 10,057 | | | | 122,696 | | | |
ASML Holding NV | | | 5,527 | | | | 148,897 | | | |
Broadcom Corp., Class A(1) | | | 4,970 | | | | 132,252 | | | |
Micron Technology, Inc.(1) | | | 24,364 | | | | 165,432 | | | |
NVIDIA Corp.(1) | | | 13,525 | | | | 161,759 | | | |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. ADR | | | 13,056 | | | | 124,554 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 986,764 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Software — 4.5% |
|
McAfee, Inc.(1) | | | 2,988 | | | $ | 125,138 | | | |
Microsoft Corp. | | | 28,643 | | | | 794,270 | | | |
Oracle Corp. | | | 12,892 | | | | 272,021 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,191,429 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail — 2.0% |
|
Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Class A | | | 1,767 | | | $ | 57,993 | | | |
Best Buy Co., Inc. | | | 2,522 | | | | 96,290 | | | |
Gap, Inc. (The) | | | 3,573 | | | | 76,247 | | | |
Home Depot, Inc. | | | 6,388 | | | | 160,275 | | | |
Staples, Inc. | | | 3,107 | | | | 67,422 | | | |
TJX Companies, Inc. (The) | | | 2,094 | | | | 78,211 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 536,438 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods — 0.4% |
|
NIKE, Inc., Class B | | | 1,905 | | | $ | 118,453 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 118,453 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Tobacco — 0.5% |
|
Philip Morris International, Inc. | | | 2,597 | | | $ | 122,994 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 122,994 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 0.8% |
|
American Tower Corp., Class A(1) | | | 5,530 | | | $ | 203,615 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 203,615 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $23,952,222) | | $ | 26,065,724 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 4.4% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(2) | | $ | 1,157 | | | $ | 1,157,344 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $1,157,344) | | $ | 1,157,344 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 103.8% | | |
(identified cost $25,109,566) | | $ | 27,223,068 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (3.8)% | | $ | (1,003,162 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 26,219,906 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
ADR - American Depositary Receipt
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(2) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $23,952,222) | | $ | 26,065,724 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $1,157,344) | | | 1,157,344 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 102,869 | | | |
Dividends receivable | | | 38,123 | | | |
Tax reclaims receivable | | | 3,122 | | | |
Receivable from affiliate | | | 19,787 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 27,386,969 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 134,489 | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 967,081 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 4,237 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 83 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 61,173 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,167,063 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 26,219,906 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 25,455,055 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss | | | (1,502,696 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 153,954 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 2,113,593 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 26,219,906 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Class A |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 22,264,247 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 1,973,771 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 11.28 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 11.97 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Class C |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 54,919 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 4,869 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 11.28 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Class I |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 3,900,740 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 345,414 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 11.29 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends (net of foreign taxes, $7,140) | | $ | 376,020 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 6,228 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (4,140 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 378,108 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 107,017 | | | |
Administration fee | | | 25,494 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 36,766 | | | |
Class C | | | 44 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 1,168 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 51,659 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 29,842 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 32,362 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 14,094 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 52,702 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 10,340 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 361,488 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Waiver and reimbursement of expenses by an affiliate | | $ | 158,579 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 158,579 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 202,909 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 175,199 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (1,207,368 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | 411 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (1,206,957 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 3,847,433 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 192 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 3,847,625 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 2,640,668 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 2,815,867 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 175,199 | | | $ | 51,829 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (1,206,957 | ) | | | (289,400 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 3,847,625 | | | | (2,824,293 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 2,815,867 | | | $ | (3,061,864 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (56,960 | ) | | $ | (22,284 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (10,814 | ) | | | — | | | |
From net realized gain | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | (169,159 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (67,774 | ) | | $ | (191,443 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 15,910,366 | | | $ | 6,916,681 | | | |
Class C | | | 81,343 | | | | — | | | |
Class I | | | 3,249,949 | | | | 1,676,440 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 49,614 | | | | 187,316 | | | |
Class I | | | 9,159 | | | | — | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (4,464,688 | ) | | | (1,910,825 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (25,000 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class I | | | (1,171,207 | ) | | | (25,400 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 13,639,536 | | | $ | 6,844,212 | | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 16,387,629 | | | $ | 3,590,905 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 9,832,277 | | | $ | 6,241,372 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 26,219,906 | | | $ | 9,832,277 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 153,954 | | | $ | 47,021 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 10.290 | | | $ | 15.440 | | | $ | 13.370 | | | $ | 12.150 | | | $ | 10.810 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.102 | | | $ | 0.092 | | | $ | 0.066 | | | $ | 0.064 | | | $ | 0.041 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.948 | | | | (4.784 | ) | | | 2.537 | | | | 1.771 | | | | 1.334 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.050 | | | $ | (4.692 | ) | | $ | 2.603 | | | $ | 1.835 | | | $ | 1.375 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.060 | ) | | $ | (0.053 | ) | | $ | (0.052 | ) | | $ | (0.021 | ) | | $ | (0.035 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.405 | ) | | | (0.481 | ) | | | (0.594 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.060 | ) | | $ | (0.458 | ) | | $ | (0.533 | ) | | $ | (0.615 | ) | | $ | (0.035 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 11.280 | | | $ | 10.290 | | | $ | 15.440 | | | $ | 13.370 | | | $ | 12.150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 10.32 | % | | | (31.29 | )% | | | 20.12 | % | | | 15.59 | % | | | 12.74 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 22,264 | | | $ | 8,487 | | | $ | 6,241 | | | $ | 3,075 | | | $ | 1,730 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4) | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.00 | % | | | 0.70 | % | | | 0.47 | % | | | 0.51 | % | | | 0.35 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 54 | % | | | 76 | % | | | 63 | % | | | 74 | % | | | 93 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | The investment adviser waived its investment adviser fee, the administrator waived its administration fee and the investment adviser subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.93%, 1.54%, 2.10%, 3.74% and 5.70% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively). Absent the waivers and subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 11.52 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(2) | | $ | (0.011 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | | (0.229 | ) | | |
|
|
Total loss from operations | | $ | (0.240 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 11.280 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (2.08 | )%(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 55 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses (5) | | | 2.00 | %(6) | | |
Net investment loss | | | (1.09 | )%(6) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 54 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the commencement of operations, October 1, 2009, to October 31, 2009. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser waived its investment adviser fee, the administrator waived its administration fee and the investment adviser subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.93% of average daily net assets for the period ended October 31, 2009). Absent the waivers and subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(6) | | Annualized. |
|
(7) | | For the Fund’s year ended October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements12
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 10.300 | | | $ | 13.070 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.120 | | | $ | 0.018 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.949 | | | | (2.788 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.069 | | | $ | (2.770 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.079 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.079 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 11.290 | | | $ | 10.300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 10.54 | % | | | (21.19 | )%(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 3,901 | | | $ | 1,345 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5) | | | 1.00 | % | | | 1.00 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.16 | % | | | 1.03 | %(6) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 54 | % | | | 76 | %(7) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the commencement of operations, September 3, 2008, to October 31, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser waived its investment adviser fee, the administrator waived its administration fee and the investment adviser subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.93% and 1.54% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2009 and the period ended October 31, 2008, respectively). Absent the waivers and subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(6) | | Annualized. |
|
(7) | | For the Fund’s year ended October 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements13
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund’s investment objective is to achieve long-term capital appreciation by investing in a diversified portfolio of equity securities. The Fund offers three classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to contingent deferred sales charge (Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income and losses, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Fund in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Fund may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities based on available market quotations provided by a third party pricing service.
14
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. However, if the ex-dividend date has passed, certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as the Fund is informed of the ex-dividend date. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends and capital gains have been provided for in accordance with the Fund’s understanding of the applicable countries’ tax rules and rates. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $1,357,502 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2016 ($193,884) and October 31, 2017 ($1,163,618).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
F Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
G Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
H Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
I Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make at least one distribution annually (normally in December) of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in
15
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 67,774 | | | $ | 64,853 | | | |
Long-term capital gains | | $ | — | | | $ | 126,590 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $678, accumulated undistributed net investment income was decreased by $492, and paid-in capital was decreased by $186 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss), distributions from real estate investment trusts (REITs) and non-deductible expenses. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 153,794 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (1,357,502 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 1,968,559 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, and distributions from REITs.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by EVM as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.65% of the Fund’s average daily net assets up to $500 million and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Fund’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Fund’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund’s investment adviser fee totaled $110,939 of which $3,922 was allocated from Cash Management and $107,017 was paid or accrued directly by the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management was 0.65% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The administration fee is earned by EVM for administering the business affairs of the Fund and is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $25,494. EVM has agreed to waive its fees and reimburse expenses to the extent that total annual operating expenses exceed 1.25%, 2.00% and 1.00% of the average daily net assets of Class A, Class C and Class I, respectively, through February 28, 2010. Thereafter, the waiver and reimbursement may be changed or terminated at any time. Pursuant to this agreement, EVM waived fees and reimbursed expenses of $158,579 for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $575 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $11,201 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A and Class C (see Note 4).
During the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM reimbursed the Fund $1,898 for a trading error. The effect of the loss incurred and the reimbursement by EVM of such amount had no impact on total return.
Except for Trustees of the Fund who are not members of EVM’s organization, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Fund who are not affiliated with EVM may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund are officers of EVM.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $36,766 for Class A shares.
16
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
The Fund also has in effect a distribution plan for Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class C Plan requires the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of Class C, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $33 for Class C shares, representing 0.75% (annualized) of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. There were no Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Class C Plan at October 31, 2009.
The Class C Plan also authorizes the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $11 for Class C shares.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDCS) of 1% generally is imposed on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class C Plan. CDSCs received on Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received no CDSCs paid by Class A and Class C shareholders.
6 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $22,954,015 and $8,783,675, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,593,249 | | | | 553,150 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 5,278 | | | | 12,657 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (449,207 | ) | | | (145,521 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 1,149,320 | | | | 420,286 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Period Ended
| | | | | | |
Class C | | October 31, 2009(1) | | | | | | |
|
Sales | | | 6,997 | | | | | | | |
Redemptions | | | (2,128 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 4,869 | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
Class I | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(2) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 319,417 | | | | 133,258 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 975 | | | | — | | | |
Redemptions | | | (105,597 | ) | | | (2,639 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 214,795 | | | | 130,619 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class C commenced operations on October 1, 2009. |
|
(2) | | Class I commenced operations on September 3, 2008. |
8 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Fund at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 25,254,600 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 2,491,933 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (523,465 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 1,968,468 | | | |
|
|
17
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
9 Line of Credit
The Fund participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Fund solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Fund based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Fund did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
10 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by companies whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Fund, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign securities markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
11 Fair Value Measurements
The Fund adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Fund’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | |
| | | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | |
| |
Common Stocks | | $ | 26,065,724 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 26,065,724 | |
|
|
Short-Term Investments | | | 1,157,344 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,157,344 | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 27,223,068 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 27,223,068 | |
|
|
The level classification by major category of investments is the same as the category presentation in the Portfolio of Investments.
The Fund held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
12 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 17, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has identified the following subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
Effective November 1, 2009, the Fund invested its assets in Large-Cap Core Research Portfolio (the Portfolio), a newly-created open-end investment company managed by BMR with the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. Concurrently, the Fund’s fiscal year-end changed from October 31 to December 31 to conform to the Portfolio’s year-end.
18
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Large-Cap
Core Research Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The financial highlights for the year ended October 31, 2006, and all prior periods presented, were audited by other auditors. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial highlights in their report dated December 19, 2006.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 17, 2009
19
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of qualified dividend income for individuals and the dividends received deduction for corporations.
Qualified Dividend Income. The Fund designates approximately $359,594, or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
Dividends Received Deduction. Corporate shareholders are generally entitled to take the dividends received deduction on the portion of the Fund’s dividend distribution that qualifies under tax law. For the Fund’s fiscal 2009 ordinary income dividends, 97.95% qualifies for the corporate dividends received deduction.
20
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
21
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of the Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Equity Research Fund) (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Fund. In particular, the Board evaluated, where relevant, the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in foreign markets. Specifically, the Board considered the Adviser’s in-house equity research capabilities. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following
22
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including administrative fee rates payable by the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Fund’s management fees (including administrative fees) and total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered the fact that the Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses for the Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Fund and other investment advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the Adviser’s profitability may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Fund, the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
23
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Large-Cap Core Research Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee of the Trust since 2007, Trustee of the Portfolio since 2009 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2007 and of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2003 and of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2003 and of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2008 and of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2007 and of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 1998 and of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
24
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007, Trustee of the Trust since 2005 and Trustee of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | | | |
| | with the
| | Term of
| | |
| | Trust
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | and the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President | | Vice President of the Trust since 2007 and of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President | | Vice President of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Martha G. Locke 6/21/52 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 4 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Vice President of the Trust since 2001 and President of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dana C. Robinson 9/10/57 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 1 registered investment company managed by EVM or BMR. |
25
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | | | |
| | with the
| | Term of
| | |
| | Trust
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | and the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary of the Trust since 2007 and of the Portfolio since 2009 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Of the Trust since 2004 and of the Portfolio since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
26
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser and Administrator of
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Annual Report October 31 , 2009 EATON VANCE FLOATING-RATE FUND |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ae8b/6ae8bf172ca443d81dc97cab14f19235c0553c5b" alt="PHOTO OF SCOTT H. PAGE"
Scott H. Page, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df1b/1df1b08b9d5364d60799e28509d50e131c3c69f6" alt="PHOTO OF CRAIG P. RUSS"
Craig P. Russ
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | During the year ending October 31, 2009, global credit markets experienced unprecedented volatility in the early months of the period but staged a remarkable turnaround beginning in January 2009. In the first two months of the period, there was little doubt that a recession would bring higher default rates; but it was difficult to reconcile bank loan and high-yield bond prices with market fundamentals. By the turn of the New Year, however, the markets began to rebound as credit spreads tightened from record levels and investors returned to the credit markets. |
• | | The loan market, as measured by the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index (the Index) returned 46.90% for the first 10 months of 2009, the highest 10-month performance in the history of the asset class. For the fiscal year, the Index returned 30.44%.1 Performance was driven by a combination of technical factors, which improved the market’s demand and supply picture. On the supply side, limited new loan issuance and a contraction of the existing supply through loan repayments reduced the available universe of purchasable loans. Matched with little selling activity and modest but steady inflows, loan prices improved significantly. More significant investor flows into the high-yield bond market also contributed to the improvement in bank loans. Increased high-yield bond issuance contributed to meaningful bank loan repayments, which lowered the available supply of loans and provided cash to bank loan managers. In addition, direct crossover buying into the asset class by high-yield bond managers bolstered demand. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
• | | The Fund’s2 investment objective is to provide a high level of current income. The Fund invests primarily in senior floating-rate loans of domestic and foreign borrowers. In managing the Fund, the investment adviser seeks to invest in a portfolio of senior loans that it believes will be less volatile over time than the general loan market. |
• | | The Fund’s investments included 421 borrowers in 39 industries as of October 31, 2009, with an average loan size of 0.23% of total investments, and no industry constituted more than 9.1% of total investments. Health care, business equipment and services, and cable and satellite television were among the top industry weightings. The Fund’s loans were primarily senior, secured loans to companies with average revenues exceeding $1 billion. |
• | | The Fund’s larger, higher-quality loans helped its performance in the earlier part of 2009 as these loans were the first to benefit from price recovery. However, the past six months witnessed a “junk rally,” with the market’s lowest-quality loans skyrocketing back to life. As a result, the Fund’s relative underweight to the lowest-quality loans, including second-lien loans and those rated below CCC, detracted slightly from relative performance in the second half of the period. |
Total Return Performance
10/31/08 – 10/31/09
| | | | |
Advisers Class3 | | | 26.83 | % |
Class A3 | | | 27.01 | |
Class B3 | | | 25.96 | |
Class C3 | | | 25.96 | |
Class I3 | | | 27.14 | |
S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index1 | | | 30.44 | |
See page 3 for more performance information.
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return reflects changes in value of the loans constituting the Index and accrual of interest and does not reflect the commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the loans represented in the Index. |
|
2 | | The Fund currently invests in a separate registered investment company, Floating Rate Portfolio (the Portfolio), with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 2.25% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Advisers Class and Class I shares are offered to investors at net asset value. |
1
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | The Fund had a 9% exposure to European loans as of October 31, 2009. The Fund’s involvement in the European leveraged loan market represented further opportunity for diversification, and while this market was affected slightly more than the U.S. bank loan market by the credit market turmoil, we believe it offers attractive appreciation opportunity at current price levels. |
|
• | | In terms of industry sectors, a relative overweight to the cable and satellite television, leisure goods, activities and movies, and business equipment and services industries benefited relative performance. Detractors included underweights to the automotive and lodging and casino industries. The Fund’s diversification was an important risk mitigator during the fiscal year. |
|
• | | As concerns about inflation and the uncertainty of the potential interest-rate impact of historic stimulus financing persists, we believe the floating-rate asset class remains attractive, especially relative to duration-exposed fixed-income alternatives. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
Top 10 Holdings1
By total investments
| | | | |
Community Health Systems, Inc. | | | 1.3 | % |
UPC Broadband Holding B.V. | | | 1.2 | |
HCA, Inc. | | | 1.2 | |
Intelsat Corp. | | | 1.2 | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc. | | | 1.2 | |
Rite Aid Corp. | | | 1.2 | |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. | | | 1.2 | |
Aramark Corp. | | | 1.0 | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC | | | 1.0 | |
Univision Communications, Inc. | | | 1.0 | |
| | |
1 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 11.5% of the Portfolio’s total investments as of 10/31/09. |
Top Five Industries2
By total investments
| | | | |
Health Care | | | 9.1 | % |
Business Equipment and Services | | | 7.9 | |
Cable and Satellite Television | | | 7.1 | |
Publishing | | | 6.7 | |
Radio and Television | | | 5.3 | |
| | |
2 | | Industries are shown as a percentage of the Portfolio’s total investments as of 10/31/09. |
Credit Quality Ratings for Total Loan Investments3
By total loan investments
| | | | |
Baa | | | 1.9 | % |
Ba | | | 37.0 | |
B | | | 35.4 | |
Ca | | | 0.8 | |
Caa | | | 5.5 | |
Defaulted | | | 7.5 | |
Non-Rated4 | | | 11.9 | |
| | |
3 | | Credit Quality ratings are those provided by Moody’s Investor Services, Inc., a nationally recognized bond rating service. Reflects the Portfolio’s total loan investments as of 10/31/09. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. |
|
4 | | Certain loans in which the Portfolio invests are not rated by a rating agency. In management’s opinion, such securities are comparable to securities rated by a rating agency in the categories listed above. |
2
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class B of the Fund with that of the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index, an unmanaged loan market index. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class B and the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
Performance1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Advisers | | | | | | | | |
| | Class | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EABLX | | EVBLX | | EBBLX | | ECBLX | | EIBLX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One year | | | 26.83 | % | | | 27.01 | % | | | 25.96 | % | | | 25.96 | % | | | 27.14 | % |
Five years | | | 2.43 | | | | 2.45 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 2.69 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.01 | | | | 2.89 | | | | 2.24 | | | | 2.25 | | | | 3.28 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One year | | | 26.83 | % | | | 24.09 | % | | | 20.96 | % | | | 24.96 | % | | | 27.14 | % |
Five years | | | 2.43 | | | | 1.98 | | | | 1.35 | | | | 1.68 | | | | 2.69 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.01 | | | | 2.53 | | | | 2.24 | | | | 2.25 | | | | 3.28 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates – Advisers Class: 2/7/01; Class A: 5/5/03; Class B: 2/5/01; Class C: 2/1/01; Class I: 1/30/01 |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns at net asset value do not include the 2.25% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B or Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I and Advisers Class shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 2.25% sales charge. SEC returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Advisers Class, Class A and Class I shares are subject to a 1% redemption fee if redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of the settlement of the purchase. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | Advisers | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.19 | % | | | 1.19 | % | | | 1.94 | % | | | 1.94 | % | | | 0.92 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. |
| | |
* | | Sources: Morningstar Direct. Class B of the Fund commenced operations on 2/5/01. |
|
| | Index data is available as of month end only. |
A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Advisers Class on 2/7/01, Class A on 5/5/03, Class C on 2/1/01 and Class I on 1/30/01 would have been valued at $12,032 ($11,761 at the maximum offering price), $12,951, $12,145 and $13,262, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,212.10 | | | | $6.08 | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,212.80 | | | | $6.08 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,207.90 | | | | $10.24 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,206.20 | | | | $10.23 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,213.50 | | | | $4.69 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.70 | | | | $5.55 | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.70 | | | | $5.55 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.90 | | | | $9.35 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.90 | | | | $9.35 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.00 | | | | $4.28 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.09% for Advisers Class shares, 1.09% for Class A shares, 1.84% for Class B shares, 1.84% for Class C shares and 0.84% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
4
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Floating Rate Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $3,098,398,937) | | $ | 2,826,837,368 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 54,943,838 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 2,881,781,206 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 11,068,289 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 3,454,281 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 873,474 | | | |
Administration fee | | | 359,020 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 513,598 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 16,268,704 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 2,865,512,502 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 3,413,891,366 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (294,170,182 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 17,352,887 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation from Portfolio | | | (271,561,569 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 2,865,512,502 | | | |
|
|
|
Advisers Class Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 355,499,109 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 42,064,927 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.45 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 946,191,491 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 108,286,527 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.74 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 97.75 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 8.94 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 66,309,305 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 7,856,960 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.44 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 618,351,431 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 73,232,006 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.44 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 879,161,166 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 104,012,522 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.45 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $100,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
Statement of Operations
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest allocated from Portfolio | | $ | 135,057,582 | | | |
Dividends allocated from Portfolio | | | 3,089 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (13,735,483 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 121,325,188 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Administration fee | | $ | 3,365,139 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | 945,054 | | | |
Class A | | | 1,836,966 | | | |
Class B | | | 703,933 | | | |
Class C | | | 5,121,952 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 460 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 46,143 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 1,822,945 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 23,337 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 402,616 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 136,006 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 36,946 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 14,441,497 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 106,883,691 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (125,442,983 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | 261,637 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (20,112,669 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (145,294,015 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 628,453,578 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (4,262,320 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 624,191,258 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 478,897,243 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 585,780,934 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 106,883,691 | | | $ | 178,714,321 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (145,294,015 | ) | | | (42,473,676 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 624,191,258 | | | | (820,613,306 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 585,780,934 | | | $ | (684,372,661 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | $ | (18,396,568 | ) | | $ | (29,921,675 | ) | | |
Class A | | | (35,377,142 | ) | | | (52,973,503 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (3,027,634 | ) | | | (6,011,875 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (21,153,855 | ) | | | (36,366,671 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (27,062,156 | ) | | | (23,289,830 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | — | | | | (5,496,201 | ) | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | (9,730,503 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (1,104,299 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (6,680,058 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (4,278,022 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (105,017,355 | ) | | $ | (175,852,637 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | $ | 244,927,561 | | | $ | 218,816,359 | | | |
Class A | | | 399,530,336 | | | | 245,044,544 | | | |
Class B | | | 4,252,368 | | | | 7,328,296 | | | |
Class C | | | 133,009,445 | | | | 86,165,024 | | | |
Class I | | | 717,929,298 | | | | 348,500,453 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | 12,233,492 | | | | 26,376,746 | | | |
Class A | | | 26,305,304 | | | | 45,278,140 | | | |
Class B | | | 2,005,266 | | | | 4,597,147 | | | |
Class C | | | 14,060,570 | | | | 28,334,958 | | | |
Class I | | | 12,824,060 | | | | 15,299,337 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | (353,600,589 | ) | | | (673,978,196 | ) | | |
Class A | | | (295,233,661 | ) | | | (981,675,043 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (21,870,007 | ) | | | (58,566,757 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (141,847,466 | ) | | | (515,413,159 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (343,518,077 | ) | | | (406,647,905 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 15,600,597 | | | | 8,347,832 | | | |
Class B | | | (15,600,597 | ) | | | (8,347,832 | ) | | |
Redemption fees | | | 582,998 | | | | 211,287 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 411,590,898 | | | $ | (1,610,328,769 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 892,354,477 | | | $ | (2,470,554,067 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 1,973,158,025 | | | $ | 4,443,712,092 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 2,865,512,502 | | | $ | 1,973,158,025 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 17,352,887 | | | $ | (3,691,049 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Advisers Class |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 7.000 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | $ | 9.840 | | | $ | 9.880 | | | $ | 9.880 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.362 | | | $ | 0.545 | | | $ | 0.636 | | | $ | 0.589 | | | $ | 0.417 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.442 | | | | (2.618 | ) | | | (0.239 | ) | | | (0.037 | ) | | | (0.005 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.804 | | | $ | (2.073 | ) | | $ | 0.397 | | | $ | 0.552 | | | $ | 0.412 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.356 | ) | | $ | (0.435 | ) | | $ | (0.648 | ) | | $ | (0.592 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.083 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.356 | ) | | $ | (0.518 | ) | | $ | (0.648 | ) | | $ | (0.592 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.002 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.001 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.450 | | | $ | 7.000 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | $ | 9.840 | | | $ | 9.880 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 26.83 | % | | | (22.55 | )% | | | 4.13 | % | | | 5.74 | % | | | 4.26 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 355,499 | | | $ | 375,801 | | | $ | 972,840 | | | $ | 1,238,349 | | | $ | 1,021,526 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.12 | % | | | 1.19 | % | | | 1.05 | % | | | 1.01 | % | | | 1.03 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.95 | % | | | 6.11 | % | | | 6.50 | % | | | 5.97 | % | | | 4.21 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount is less than $0.0005. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 7.240 | | | $ | 9.920 | | | $ | 10.180 | | | $ | 10.220 | | | $ | 10.210 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.372 | | | $ | 0.560 | | | $ | 0.657 | | | $ | 0.608 | | | $ | 0.430 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.494 | | | | (2.705 | ) | | | (0.248 | ) | | | (0.036 | ) | | | 0.006 | | | (2) |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.866 | | | $ | (2.145 | ) | | $ | 0.409 | | | $ | 0.572 | | | $ | 0.436 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.368 | ) | | $ | (0.450 | ) | | $ | (0.670 | ) | | $ | (0.612 | ) | | $ | (0.427 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.086 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.368 | ) | | $ | (0.536 | ) | | $ | (0.670 | ) | | $ | (0.612 | ) | | $ | (0.427 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.002 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.001 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.740 | | | $ | 7.240 | | | $ | 9.920 | | | $ | 10.180 | | | $ | 10.220 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 27.01 | % | | | (22.66 | )% | | | 4.12 | % | | | 5.75 | % | | | 4.36 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 946,191 | | | $ | 646,322 | | | $ | 1,619,235 | | | $ | 1,839,719 | | | $ | 1,521,460 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 1.12 | % | | | 1.19 | % | | | 1.05 | % | | | 1.01 | % | | | 1.03 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.90 | % | | | 6.08 | % | | | 6.50 | % | | | 5.96 | % | | | 4.21 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(3) | | Amount is less than $0.0005. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 6.990 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | $ | 9.840 | | | $ | 9.870 | | | $ | 9.870 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.315 | | | $ | 0.469 | | | $ | 0.563 | | | $ | 0.511 | | | $ | 0.336 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.436 | | | | (2.616 | ) | | | (0.240 | ) | | | (0.023 | ) | | | 0.002 | | | (2) |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.751 | | | $ | (2.147 | ) | | $ | 0.323 | | | $ | 0.488 | | | $ | 0.338 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.303 | ) | | $ | (0.382 | ) | | $ | (0.574 | ) | | $ | (0.518 | ) | | $ | (0.339 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.072 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.303 | ) | | $ | (0.454 | ) | | $ | (0.574 | ) | | $ | (0.518 | ) | | $ | (0.339 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.002 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.001 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.440 | | | $ | 6.990 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | $ | 9.840 | | | $ | 9.870 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 25.96 | % | | | (23.22 | )% | | | 3.35 | % | | | 5.06 | % | | | 3.48 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 66,309 | | | $ | 85,386 | | | $ | 177,431 | | | $ | 230,454 | | | $ | 264,403 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 1.88 | % | | | 1.94 | % | | | 1.80 | % | | | 1.77 | % | | | 1.78 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.38 | % | | | 5.29 | % | | | 5.76 | % | | | 5.18 | % | | | 3.40 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(3) | | Amount is less than $0.0005. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 6.990 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | $ | 9.840 | | | $ | 9.870 | | | $ | 9.870 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.308 | | | $ | 0.472 | | | $ | 0.562 | | | $ | 0.512 | | | $ | 0.338 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.443 | | | | (2.619 | ) | | | (0.239 | ) | | | (0.024 | ) | | | (0.000 | )(2) | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 1.751 | | | $ | (2.147 | ) | | $ | 0.323 | | | $ | 0.488 | | | $ | 0.338 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.303 | ) | | $ | (0.382 | ) | | $ | (0.574 | ) | | $ | (0.518 | ) | | $ | (0.339 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.072 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.303 | ) | | $ | (0.454 | ) | | $ | (0.574 | ) | | $ | (0.518 | ) | | $ | (0.339 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.002 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.001 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.440 | | | $ | 6.990 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | $ | 9.840 | | | $ | 9.870 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 25.96 | % | | | (23.22 | )% | | | 3.35 | % | | | 5.06 | % | | | 3.48 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 618,351 | | | $ | 512,400 | | | $ | 1,142,139 | | | $ | 1,170,248 | | | $ | 1,220,713 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 1.87 | % | | | 1.94 | % | | | 1.80 | % | | | 1.76 | % | | | 1.78 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.22 | % | | | 5.31 | % | | | 5.75 | % | | | 5.19 | % | | | 3.42 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount is less than $(0.0005). |
|
(3) | | Amount is less than $0.0005. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 7.000 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | $ | 9.840 | | | $ | 9.880 | | | $ | 9.880 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.372 | | | $ | 0.550 | | | $ | 0.658 | | | $ | 0.614 | | | $ | 0.440 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.450 | | | | (2.601 | ) | | | (0.237 | ) | | | (0.037 | ) | | | (0.003 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.822 | | | $ | (2.051 | ) | | $ | 0.421 | | | $ | 0.577 | | | $ | 0.437 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.374 | ) | | $ | (0.456 | ) | | $ | (0.672 | ) | | $ | (0.617 | ) | | $ | (0.438 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.084 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.374 | ) | | $ | (0.540 | ) | | $ | (0.672 | ) | | $ | (0.617 | ) | | $ | (0.438 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.002 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.001 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.450 | | | $ | 7.000 | | | $ | 9.590 | | | $ | 9.840 | | | $ | 9.880 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 27.14 | % | | | (22.36 | )% | | | 4.39 | % | | | 6.00 | % | | | 4.52 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 879,161 | | | $ | 353,249 | | | $ | 532,067 | | | $ | 485,274 | | | $ | 371,698 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 0.87 | % | | | 0.92 | % | | | 0.80 | % | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.78 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.99 | % | | | 6.22 | % | | | 6.73 | % | | | 6.22 | % | | | 4.45 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount is less than $0.0005. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers five classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). The Advisers Class and Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Floating Rate Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (65.8% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $292,181,002 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2010 ($8,217,006), October 31, 2011 ($8,406,344), October 31, 2012 ($4,215,434), October 31, 2013 ($7,255,003), October 31, 2014 ($1,123,368), October 31, 2015 ($24,641,774), October 31, 2016 ($205,764,300) and October 31, 2017 ($32,557,773).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
12
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Redemption Fees — Upon the redemption or exchange of shares by Advisers Class, Class A and Class I shareholders within 90 days of the settlement of purchase, a fee of 1% of the current net asset value of these shares will be assessed and retained by the Fund for the benefit of the remaining shareholders. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in capital.
I Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund declares dividends daily to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are generally paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any) are made at least annually. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 105,017,355 | | | $ | 148,563,554 | | | |
Tax return of capital | | $ | — | | | $ | 27,289,083 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $110,779,252, accumulated undistributed net investment income was increased by $19,177,600 and paid-in capital was decreased by $129,956,852 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss), defaulted bonds and mixed straddles. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 20,982,667 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (292,181,002 | ) | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (273,726,248 | ) | | |
Other temporary differences | | $ | (3,454,281 | ) | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, partnership allocations, swap contracts, defaulted bond interest and the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
The administration fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for administrative services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $3,365,139. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report.
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $94,289 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $56,336 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received
13
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
distribution and service fees from Advisers Class, Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect distribution plans for the Advisers Class shares (Advisers Plan) and Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Advisers Plan and the Class A Plan provide that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Advisers Class and Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $945,054 for Advisers Class shares and $1,836,966 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $527,950 and $3,841,464 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $10,188,300 and $169,519,800, respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $175,983 and $1,280,488 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $103,300, $157,200 and $77,900 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $1,168,992,655 and $928,981,246, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
14
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Advisers Class | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 34,360,507 | | | | 25,031,349 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,692,123 | | | | 2,990,674 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (47,679,940 | ) | | | (75,723,481 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (11,627,310 | ) | | | (47,701,458 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 53,515,058 | | | | 26,587,171 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 3,498,974 | | | | 4,977,937 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (40,072,369 | ) | | | (106,370,562 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 2,015,779 | | | | 899,904 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 18,957,442 | | | | (73,905,550 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 577,617 | | | | 814,509 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 284,177 | | | | 524,266 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (3,134,852 | ) | | | (6,703,368 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (2,084,741 | ) | | | (929,486 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (4,357,799 | ) | | | (6,294,079 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 18,423,107 | | | | 9,620,150 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,960,323 | | | | 3,227,152 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (20,441,095 | ) | | | (58,681,438 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (57,665 | ) | | | (45,834,136 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class I | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 99,007,256 | | | | 39,320,396 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,747,321 | | | | 1,744,790 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (47,215,092 | ) | | | (46,050,148 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 53,539,485 | | | | (4,984,962 | ) | | |
|
|
For the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the Fund received $582,998 and $211,287, respectively, in redemption fees.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 28, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
15
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance
Floating-Rate Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 2009
16
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund.
17
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Floating-Rate Interests — 98.2%(1) |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace and Defense — 2.1% |
|
AWAS Capital, Inc. |
| 9,452 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing March 22, 2013 | | $ | 8,743,162 | | | |
CACI International, Inc. |
| 4,220 | | | Term Loan, 1.78%, Maturing May 3, 2011 | | | 4,156,673 | | | |
DAE Aviation Holdings, Inc. |
| 2,852 | | | Term Loan, 4.01%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 2,681,186 | | | |
| 2,916 | | | Term Loan, 4.04%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 2,741,243 | | | |
Evergreen International Aviation |
| 10,729 | | | Term Loan, 12.00%, Maturing October 31, 2011 | | | 8,529,949 | | | |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition |
| 18,956 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing March 26, 2014 | | | 15,070,326 | | | |
| 1,238 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing March 26, 2014 | | | 983,927 | | | |
Hexcel Corp. |
| 5,625 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing May 21, 2014 | | | 5,667,187 | | | |
IAP Worldwide Services, Inc. |
| 3,326 | | | Term Loan, 9.25%, Maturing December 30, 2012(2) | | | 2,796,828 | | | |
PGS Solutions, Inc. |
| 1,920 | | | Term Loan, 2.65%, Maturing February 14, 2013 | | | 1,823,731 | | | |
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. |
| 3,748 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing December 31, 2011 | | | 3,631,301 | | | |
TransDigm, Inc. |
| 11,650 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing June 23, 2013 | | | 11,202,721 | | | |
Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc. |
| 7,407 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.50%, Maturing December 22, 2009(3) | | | 7,185,185 | | | |
| 2,778 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 17, 2011 | | | 2,777,778 | | | |
| 3,585 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 17, 2011 | | | 3,593,556 | | | |
| 860 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 22, 2011 | | | 854,945 | | | |
Wesco Aircraft Hardware Corp. |
| 7,132 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing September 29, 2013 | | | 6,766,788 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 89,206,486 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Air Transport — 0.3% |
|
Delta Air Lines, Inc. |
| 11,428 | | | Term Loan, 2.20%, Maturing April 30, 2012 | | $ | 9,756,655 | | | |
| 5,417 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.53%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 4,566,427 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,323,082 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Automotive — 3.9% |
|
Accuride Corp. |
| 11,097 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing January 31, 2012 | | $ | 11,044,990 | | | |
| 3,108 | | | Term Loan, Maturing September 30, 2013(4) | | | 3,177,338 | | | |
Adesa, Inc. |
| 21,183 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing October 18, 2013 | | | 20,335,780 | | | |
Allison Transmission, Inc. |
| 6,667 | | | Term Loan, 3.01%, Maturing September 30, 2014 | | | 5,999,170 | | | |
Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc. |
| 915 | | | Revolving Loan, 6.75%, Maturing December 23, 2011 | | | 839,149 | | | |
| 5,581 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing December 23, 2010 | | | 5,120,791 | | | |
| 286 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing December 23, 2011 | | | 262,245 | | | |
Dayco Products, LLC |
| 1,489 | | | DIP Loan, 8.50%, Maturing May 4, 2010 | | | 1,508,300 | | | |
| 1,534 | | | DIP Loan, 8.50%, Maturing May 4, 2010 | | | 1,538,936 | | | |
| 8,180 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing June 21, 2011(5) | | | 3,749,028 | | | |
Federal-Mogul Corp. |
| 19,197 | | | Term Loan, 2.19%, Maturing December 27, 2014 | | | 14,794,017 | | | |
| 10,522 | | | Term Loan, 2.19%, Maturing December 27, 2015 | | | 8,108,173 | | | |
Financiere Truck (Investissement) |
EUR | 1,313 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing February 15, 2012 | | | 1,390,710 | | | |
Ford Motor Co. |
| 10,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 2.50%, Maturing December 15, 2013(3) | | | 9,095,000 | | | |
| 6,946 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing December 15, 2013 | | | 6,207,604 | | | |
Fraikin, Ltd. |
GBP | 1,612 | | | Term Loan, 0.93%, Maturing February 15, 2012(3) | | | 1,904,918 | | | |
GBP | 718 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing February 15, 2012(3) | | | 848,210 | | | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. |
| 35,256 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 2.34%, Maturing April 30, 2010 | | | 32,321,938 | | | |
HLI Operating Co., Inc. |
| 2,496 | | | DIP Loan, 26.00%, Maturing November 30, 2009(2) | | | 2,521,322 | | | |
See notes to financial statements18
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Automotive (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
EUR | 425 | | | Term Loan, 11.00%, Maturing May 30, 2014 | | $ | 46,959 | | | |
EUR | 7,227 | | | Term Loan, 11.50%, Maturing May 30, 2014 | | | 1,648,534 | | | |
Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. |
| 6,841 | | | Term Loan, 3.78%, Maturing January 12, 2012 | | | 4,190,286 | | | |
Locafroid Services S.A.S. |
EUR | 309 | | | Term Loan, 3.47%, Maturing February 15, 2012 | | | 327,361 | | | |
Tenneco Automotive, Inc. |
| 5,050 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing March 17, 2014 | | | 4,772,250 | | | |
TriMas Corp. |
| 894 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing August 2, 2011 | | | 823,367 | | | |
| 7,960 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 7,333,208 | | | |
TRW Automotive, Inc. |
| 10,178 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing February 2, 2014 | | | 10,196,885 | | | |
United Components, Inc. |
| 7,456 | | | Term Loan, 2.72%, Maturing June 30, 2010 | | | 6,915,496 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 167,021,965 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverage and Tobacco — 0.3% |
|
Culligan International Co. |
| 12,320 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 24, 2014 | | $ | 9,609,850 | | | |
Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc. |
| 997 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing May 31, 2012 | | | 976,194 | | | |
Van Houtte, Inc. |
| 116 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing July 11, 2014 | | | 110,591 | | | |
| 850 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing July 11, 2014 | | | 810,997 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,507,632 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Brokers, Dealers and Investment Houses — 0.2% |
|
AmeriTrade Holding Corp. |
| 9,446 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing December 31, 2012 | | $ | 9,185,723 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,185,723 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building and Development — 2.7% |
|
401 North Wabash Venture, LLC |
| 3,789 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing May 7, 2009(6) | | $ | 2,841,393 | | | |
AIMCO Properties, L.P. |
| 5,627 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing March 23, 2011 | | | 5,402,250 | | | |
Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc. |
| 4,337 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing September 30, 2013 | | | 4,092,939 | | | |
Brickman Group Holdings, Inc. |
| 5,830 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing January 23, 2014 | | | 5,504,498 | | | |
Building Materials Corp. of America |
| 3,564 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing February 22, 2014 | | | 3,299,591 | | | |
Capital Automotive (REIT) |
| 2,697 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing December 14, 2012 | | | 2,414,231 | | | |
Contech Construction Products |
| 1,767 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing January 13, 2013 | | | 1,590,457 | | | |
Epco/Fantome, LLC |
| 9,460 | | | Term Loan, 2.87%, Maturing November 23, 2010 | | | 7,236,900 | | | |
Forestar USA Real Estate Group, Inc. |
| 9,442 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.39%, Maturing December 1, 2010(3) | | | 7,930,940 | | | |
| 4,018 | | | Term Loan, 5.10%, Maturing December 1, 2010 | | | 3,616,071 | | | |
Hearthstone Housing Partners II, LLC |
| 4,347 | | | Revolving Loan, 1.75%, Maturing December 1, 2009(3) | | | 2,896,184 | | | |
Lafarge Roofing |
| 637 | | | Term Loan, 2.41%, Maturing July 16, 2014 | | | 467,278 | | | |
| 940 | | | Term Loan, 2.66%, Maturing July 16, 2014 | | | 689,269 | | | |
EUR | 1,417 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing July 16, 2014(2) | | | 1,529,749 | | | |
EUR | 1,415 | | | Term Loan, 3.12%, Maturing July 16, 2014 | | | 1,527,472 | | | |
EUR | 1,819 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing April 16, 2015(2) | | | 1,305,019 | | | |
LNR Property Corp. |
| 8,208 | | | Term Loan, 3.75%, Maturing July 3, 2011 | | | 6,525,629 | | | |
Mueller Water Products, Inc. |
| 6,328 | | | Term Loan, 5.78%, Maturing May 24, 2014 | | | 6,195,990 | | | |
NCI Building Systems, Inc. |
| 3,056 | | | Term Loan, 4.03%, Maturing June 18, 2010 | | | 2,845,825 | | | |
November 2005 Land Investors |
| 610 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing May 9, 2011(5) | | | 207,292 | | | |
Panolam Industries Holdings, Inc. |
| 4,680 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing September 30, 2012 | | | 4,223,335 | | | |
Re/Max International, Inc. |
| 8,620 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing December 17, 2012 | | | 8,447,695 | | | |
Realogy Corp. |
| 2,817 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing September 1, 2014 | | | 2,368,506 | | | |
| 10,464 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing September 1, 2014 | | | 8,797,301 | | | |
Sanitec Europe OY |
EUR | 3,470 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing June 25, 2016 | | | 3,540,911 | | | |
South Edge, LLC |
| 8,795 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing October 31, 2009(6) | | | 2,704,353 | | | |
See notes to financial statements19
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Building and Development (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Standard Pacific Corp. |
| 4,680 | | | Term Loan, 2.19%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | $ | 3,907,800 | | | |
WCI Communities, Inc. |
| 3,660 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing September 3, 2014 | | | 3,138,098 | | | |
| 9,911 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing September 3, 2014 | | | 9,786,687 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 115,033,663 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Business Equipment and Services — 8.2% |
|
Activant Solutions, Inc. |
| 8,237 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing May 1, 2013 | | $ | 7,681,448 | | | |
Acxiom Corp. |
| 8,845 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing September 15, 2012 | | | 8,801,236 | | | |
Affiliated Computer Services |
| 10,037 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 20, 2013 | | | 9,931,565 | | | |
| 5,871 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 20, 2013 | | | 5,809,666 | | | |
Affinion Group, Inc. |
| 5,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.53%, Maturing October 17, 2011(3) | | | 4,387,500 | | | |
| 16,134 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing October 17, 2012 | | | 15,516,430 | | | |
Education Management, LLC |
| 11,302 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing June 1, 2013 | | | 10,622,072 | | | |
Info USA, Inc. |
| 815 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing February 14, 2012 | | | 788,846 | | | |
| 1,796 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing February 14, 2012 | | | 1,737,631 | | | |
Information Resources, Inc. |
| 4,422 | | | Term Loan, 2.14%, Maturing May 7, 2014 | | | 4,190,075 | | | |
Intergraph Corp. |
| 3,350 | | | Term Loan, 2.37%, Maturing May 29, 2014 | | | 3,213,449 | | | |
iPayment, Inc. |
| 11,663 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing May 10, 2013 | | | 10,656,911 | | | |
Kronos, Inc. |
| 10,309 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing June 11, 2014 | | | 9,729,543 | | | |
Language Line, Inc. |
| 6,235 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing June 11, 2011 | | | 6,235,467 | | | |
| 12,325 | | | Term Loan, Maturing October 30, 2015(4) | | | 12,332,703 | | | |
Mitchell International, Inc. |
| 1,990 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing March 28, 2014 | | | 1,803,253 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.56%, Maturing March 28, 2015 | | | 1,020,000 | | | |
N.E.W. Holdings I, LLC |
| 9,167 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing May 22, 2014 | | | 8,587,917 | | | |
Protection One, Inc. |
| 10,574 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing March 31, 2012 | | | 10,118,122 | | | |
Quintiles Transnational Corp. |
| 10,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.25%, Maturing March 31, 2012(3) | | | 9,284,000 | | | |
| 13,404 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing March 31, 2013 | | | 12,792,083 | | | |
Sabre, Inc. |
| 30,770 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing September 30, 2014 | | | 26,711,975 | | | |
Safenet, Inc. |
| 3,910 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 12, 2014 | | | 3,668,069 | | | |
Serena Software, Inc. |
| 7,061 | | | Term Loan, 2.32%, Maturing March 10, 2013 | | | 6,539,914 | | | |
Sitel (Client Logic) |
| 6,866 | | | Term Loan, 5.77%, Maturing January 29, 2014 | | | 5,973,293 | | | |
EUR | 941 | | | Term Loan, 5.93%, Maturing January 29, 2014 | | | 1,135,594 | | | |
Solera Holdings, LLC |
| 3,755 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 3,607,286 | | | |
EUR | 2,969 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 4,237,919 | | | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc. |
| 7,420 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing February 11, 2013 | | | 6,986,141 | | | |
| 3,440 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 3,483,253 | | | |
| 42,536 | | | Term Loan, 4.07%, Maturing February 28, 2016 | | | 41,389,460 | | | |
Ticketmaster |
| 8,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.55%, Maturing July 22, 2014 | | | 7,880,000 | | | |
Transaction Network Services, Inc. |
| 3,919 | | | Term Loan, 9.50%, Maturing May 4, 2012 | | | 3,958,163 | | | |
Travelport, LLC |
| 10,753 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 9,803,979 | | | |
| 13,317 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 12,152,139 | | | |
| 4,672 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 4,263,334 | | | |
EUR | 2,106 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 2,773,633 | | | |
| 2,494 | | | Term Loan, 10.50%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 2,535,313 | | | |
Valassis Communications, Inc. |
| 736 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing March 2, 2014 | | | 688,617 | | | |
| 4,361 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing March 2, 2014 | | | 4,081,522 | | | |
VWR International, Inc. |
| 16,633 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 28, 2013 | | | 15,219,481 | | | |
West Corp. |
| 12,166 | | | Term Loan, 2.62%, Maturing October 24, 2013 | | | 11,198,859 | | | |
| 17,672 | | | Term Loan, 4.12%, Maturing July 15, 2016 | | | 16,651,209 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 350,179,070 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Cable and Satellite Television — 7.3% |
|
Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC |
| 9,403 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing June 8, 2013 | | $ | 9,379,923 | | | |
| 350 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing September 1, 2013 | | | 345,175 | | | |
See notes to financial statements20
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cable and Satellite Television (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Bresnan Broadband Holdings, LLC |
| 1,493 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing March 29, 2014 | | $ | 1,437,774 | | | |
| 15,474 | | | Term Loan, 2.42%, Maturing March 29, 2014 | | | 14,906,367 | | | |
Cequel Communications, LLC |
| 38,664 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing November 5, 2013 | | | 37,020,778 | | | |
Charter Communications Operating, Inc. |
| 45,219 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing April 28, 2013 | | | 41,229,789 | | | |
CSC Holdings, Inc. |
| 14,767 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing March 29, 2013 | | | 14,086,273 | | | |
CW Media Holdings, Inc. |
| 4,962 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing February 15, 2015 | | | 4,614,684 | | | |
DirectTV Holdings, LLC |
| 1,975 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing April 13, 2013 | | | 1,978,079 | | | |
Foxco Acquisition Sub., LLC |
| 5,534 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing July 2, 2015 | | | 5,056,699 | | | |
Insight Midwest Holdings, LLC |
| 26,316 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing April 6, 2014 | | | 25,080,334 | | | |
MCC Iowa, LLC |
| 394 | | | Term Loan, 1.73%, Maturing March 31, 2010 | | | 390,246 | | | |
| 7,656 | | | Term Loan, 1.98%, Maturing January 31, 2015 | | | 7,043,305 | | | |
| 7,780 | | | Term Loan, 1.98%, Maturing January 31, 2015 | | | 7,157,600 | | | |
Mediacom Illinois, LLC |
| 1,620 | | | Term Loan, 1.48%, Maturing September 30, 2012 | | | 1,506,600 | | | |
| 14,176 | | | Term Loan, 1.73%, Maturing January 31, 2015 | | | 13,035,662 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing March 31, 2017 | | | 3,015,000 | | | |
NTL Investment Holdings, Ltd. |
GBP | 3,500 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.62%, Maturing March 30, 2013 | | | 5,331,495 | | | |
ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG |
EUR | 1,887 | | | Term Loan, Maturing June 26, 2014(4) | | | 2,320,919 | | | |
EUR | 113 | | | Term Loan, Maturing July 2, 2014(4) | | | 143,514 | | | |
EUR | 2,020 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing March 2, 2015 | | | 1,989,790 | | | |
EUR | 729 | | | Term Loan, 2.73%, Maturing June 26, 2015 | | | 908,338 | | | |
EUR | 15,457 | | | Term Loan, 2.73%, Maturing June 26, 2015 | | | 19,250,130 | | | |
EUR | 2,020 | | | Term Loan, 3.78%, Maturing March 2, 2016 | | | 1,989,790 | | | |
UPC Broadband Holding B.V. |
| 7,083 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 6,642,839 | | | |
| 4,842 | | | Term Loan, 3.75%, Maturing December 31, 2016 | | | 4,660,863 | | | |
EUR | 19,765 | | | Term Loan, 4.19%, Maturing December 31, 2016 | | | 26,760,394 | | | |
EUR | 10,790 | | | Term Loan, 4.44%, Maturing December 31, 2017 | | | 14,675,363 | | | |
Virgin Media Investment Holding |
GBP | 2,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing March 2, 2012(4) | | | 3,203,420 | | | |
| 7,994 | | | Term Loan, 3.78%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 7,963,901 | | | |
GBP | 2,224 | | | Term Loan, 4.40%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 3,544,651 | | | |
GBP | 3,638 | | | Term Loan, 4.40%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 5,797,625 | | | |
GBP | 1,130 | | | Term Loan, 4.43%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 1,801,099 | | | |
YPSO Holding SA |
EUR | 3,159 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing July 28, 2014 | | | 3,599,311 | | | |
EUR | 5,155 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing July 28, 2014 | | | 5,872,561 | | | |
EUR | 8,186 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing July 28, 2014 | | | 9,326,637 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 313,066,928 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics — 5.1% |
|
Arizona Chemical, Inc. |
EUR | 2,814 | | | Term Loan, 2.82%, Maturing February 28, 2013 | | $ | 3,934,013 | | | |
Ashland, Inc. |
| 3,458 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing May 20, 2014 | | | 3,484,031 | | | |
| 1,298 | | | Term Loan, 7.65%, Maturing November 20, 2014 | | | 1,321,094 | | | |
Brenntag Holding GmbH and Co. KG |
| 10,877 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 10,360,709 | | | |
| 3,477 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 3,311,752 | | | |
EUR | 3,434 | | | Term Loan, 2.88%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 4,889,331 | | | |
EUR | 230 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.02%, Maturing June 23, 2015 | | | 320,635 | | | |
EUR | 770 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.02%, Maturing June 23, 2015 | | | 1,073,754 | | | |
British Vita UK, Ltd. |
EUR | 1,196 | | | Term Loan, 5.78%, Maturing June 30, 2014(2) | | | 1,208,583 | | | |
Celanese Holdings, LLC |
| 10,176 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 9,562,083 | | | |
| 13,433 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 12,599,228 | | | |
Cognis GmbH |
EUR | 1,249 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing September 15, 2013 | | | 1,677,343 | | | |
EUR | 4,276 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing September 15, 2013 | | | 5,744,980 | | | |
Columbian Chemicals Acquisition |
| 8,627 | | | Term Loan, 6.31%, Maturing March 16, 2013 | | | 7,365,464 | | | |
Ferro Corp. |
| 13,520 | | | Term Loan, 6.29%, Maturing June 6, 2012 | | | 12,877,833 | | | |
First Chemical Holding |
EUR | 575 | | | Term Loan, 3.32%, Maturing December 18, 2014 | | | 619,890 | | | |
EUR | 575 | | | Term Loan, 3.82%, Maturing December 18, 2015 | | | 619,890 | | | |
Georgia Gulf Corp. |
| 5,068 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing October 3, 2013 | | | 5,070,261 | | | |
See notes to financial statements21
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. |
EUR | 1,105 | | | Term Loan, 2.95%, Maturing May 5, 2012 | | $ | 1,266,405 | | | |
| 9,600 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 6,480,000 | | | |
| 2,936 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 2,334,392 | | | |
| 13,520 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 10,748,060 | | | |
| 2,481 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 1,966,540 | | | |
Huntsman International, LLC |
| 7,500 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.91%, Maturing August 16, 2010(3) | | | 6,890,625 | | | |
| 18,328 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing August 16, 2012 | | | 16,783,144 | | | |
INEOS Group |
EUR | 150 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 14, 2011(4) | | | 188,284 | | | |
EUR | 150 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 14, 2011(4) | | | 188,284 | | | |
EUR | 2,911 | | | Term Loan, 5.52%, Maturing December 14, 2011 | | | 3,648,230 | | | |
EUR | 2,912 | | | Term Loan, 6.02%, Maturing December 14, 2011 | | | 3,649,514 | | | |
| 3,872 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing December 14, 2012 | | | 3,339,481 | | | |
| 9,968 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 14, 2013 | | | 8,552,579 | | | |
| 9,968 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing December 14, 2014 | | | 8,552,579 | | | |
ISP Chemco, Inc. |
| 8,516 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 8,082,544 | | | |
Kranton Polymers, LLC |
| 15,980 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing May 12, 2013 | | | 15,205,219 | | | |
MacDermid, Inc. |
| 3,082 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing April 12, 2014 | | | 2,619,606 | | | |
Millenium Inorganic Chemicals |
| 6,645 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 6,113,116 | | | |
Momentive Performance Material |
| 4,900 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing December 4, 2013 | | | 4,102,001 | | | |
Nalco Co. |
| 3,035 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing May 6, 2016 | | | 3,091,651 | | | |
Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. |
EUR | 653 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing July 30, 2011 | | | 917,657 | | | |
| 19,572 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 19,848,843 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 220,609,628 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Clothing / Textiles — 0.3% |
|
Hanesbrands, Inc. |
| 6,512 | | | Term Loan, 5.03%, Maturing September 5, 2013 | | $ | 6,550,460 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.99%, Maturing March 5, 2014 | | | 4,843,750 | | | |
St. John Knits International, Inc. |
| 3,861 | | | Term Loan, 9.25%, Maturing March 23, 2012 | | | 3,127,584 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,521,794 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Conglomerates — 3.0% |
|
Amsted Industries, Inc. |
| 10,020 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing October 15, 2010 | | $ | 9,193,785 | | | |
| 6,753 | | | Term Loan, 2.40%, Maturing April 5, 2013 | | | 6,195,633 | | | |
Doncasters (Dunde HoldCo 4 Ltd.) |
GBP | 659 | | | Term Loan, 3.02%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 878,856 | | | |
GBP | 659 | | | Term Loan, 3.52%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 878,856 | | | |
| 3,595 | | | Term Loan, 4.24%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 2,921,189 | | | |
| 3,595 | | | Term Loan, 4.74%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 2,921,189 | | | |
GenTek, Inc. |
| 3,285 | | | Term Loan, Maturing February 25, 2011(4) | | | 3,303,689 | | | |
| 1,715 | | | Term Loan, Maturing February 28, 2011(4) | | | 1,724,436 | | | |
| 2,125 | | | Term Loan, Maturing October 29, 2014(4) | | | 2,140,051 | | | |
Jarden Corp. |
| 3,481 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing January 24, 2012 | | | 3,359,406 | | | |
| 8,467 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing January 24, 2012 | | | 8,189,549 | | | |
| 1,542 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing January 24, 2012 | | | 1,513,974 | | | |
Johnson Diversey, Inc. |
| 1,993 | | | Term Loan, 2.48%, Maturing December 16, 2010 | | | 1,984,707 | | | |
| 7,883 | | | Term Loan, 2.48%, Maturing December 16, 2011 | | | 7,850,920 | | | |
Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The) |
| 15,616 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing August 21, 2014 | | | 15,401,162 | | | |
Polymer Group, Inc. |
| 1,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.74%, Maturing November 22, 2010(3) | | | 850,000 | | | |
| 1,830 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 22, 2012 | | | 1,820,483 | | | |
| 14,060 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing November 22, 2014 | | | 14,095,227 | | | |
RBS Global, Inc. |
| 5,551 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 19, 2013 | | | 5,323,911 | | | |
| 19,195 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing July 19, 2013 | | | 18,490,726 | | | |
RGIS Holdings, LLC |
| 729 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 649,616 | | | |
| 14,578 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 12,992,330 | | | |
US Investigations Services, Inc. |
| 2,940 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing February 21, 2015 | | | 2,739,951 | | | |
Vertrue, Inc. |
| 4,449 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing August 16, 2014 | | | 3,681,486 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 129,101,132 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements22
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Containers and Glass Products — 3.1% |
|
Berry Plastics Corp. |
| 20,393 | | | Term Loan, 2.30%, Maturing April 3, 2015 | | $ | 17,571,642 | | | |
Celanese AG |
EUR | 975 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing April 6, 2011 | | | 1,352,355 | | | |
Consolidated Container Co. |
| 5,821 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing March 28, 2014 | | | 5,417,917 | | | |
Crown Americas, Inc. |
| 1,407 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 1,379,542 | | | |
| 4,703 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 4,612,387 | | | |
EUR | 4,365 | | | Term Loan, 2.18%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 6,206,954 | | | |
Graham Packaging Holdings Co. |
| 4,804 | | | Term Loan, 2.55%, Maturing October 7, 2011 | | | 4,699,176 | | | |
| 19,095 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing April 5, 2014 | | | 19,143,031 | | | |
Graphic Packaging International, Inc. |
| 27,563 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing May 16, 2014 | | | 26,273,710 | | | |
| 3,448 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing May 16, 2014 | | | 3,318,219 | | | |
JSG Acquisitions |
EUR | 1,689 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 2,395,484 | | | |
EUR | 1,692 | | | Term Loan, 4.11%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 2,399,068 | | | |
OI European Group B.V. |
EUR | 12,065 | | | Term Loan, 1.93%, Maturing June 14, 2013 | | | 17,014,945 | | | |
Owens-Brockway Glass Container |
| 4,097 | | | Term Loan, 1.74%, Maturing June 14, 2013 | | | 4,002,688 | | | |
Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. |
| 657 | | | DIP Loan, 10.00%, Maturing August 6, 2010 | | | 660,631 | | | |
| 7,935 | | | Revolving Loan, 2.84%, Maturing July 28, 2010 | | | 7,776,471 | | | |
| 2,632 | | | Revolving Loan, 3.06%, Maturing July 28, 2010 | | | 2,579,219 | | | |
| 1,033 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 1,003,874 | | | |
| 1,813 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 1,765,742 | | | |
| 3,416 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 3,320,309 | | | |
| 1,593 | | | Term Loan, 4.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 1,551,583 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 134,444,947 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Cosmetics / Toiletries — 0.2% |
|
American Safety Razor Co. |
| 3,382 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing July 31, 2013 | | $ | 3,221,352 | | | |
Bausch & Lomb, Inc. |
| 382 | | | Term Loan, 3.52%, Maturing April 30, 2015 | | | 364,889 | | | |
| 1,573 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing April 30, 2015 | | | 1,502,579 | | | |
Prestige Brands, Inc. |
| 5,100 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing April 7, 2011 | | | 5,010,954 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,099,774 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Drugs — 0.6% |
|
Graceway Pharmaceuticals, LLC |
| 15,351 | | | Term Loan, 2.99%, Maturing May 3, 2012 | | $ | 10,822,562 | | | |
Pharmaceutical Holdings Corp. |
| 2,205 | | | Term Loan, 3.50%, Maturing January 30, 2012 | | | 2,089,180 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp. |
| 4,562 | | | Term Loan, Maturing October 30, 2014(4) | | | 4,576,193 | | | |
| 1,597 | | | Term Loan, Maturing April 30, 2015(4) | | | 1,601,667 | | | |
| 2,281 | | | Term Loan, Maturing April 30, 2015(4) | | | 2,288,096 | | | |
| 5,018 | | | Term Loan, Maturing April 30, 2015(4) | | | 4,967,563 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 26,345,261 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.6% |
|
Big Dumpster Merger Sub, Inc. |
| 668 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing February 5, 2013 | | $ | 435,644 | | | |
Blue Waste B.V. (AVR Acquisition) |
EUR | 2,000 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing April 1, 2015 | | | 2,724,026 | | | |
Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc. |
| 417 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 13.50%, Maturing December 12, 2010 | | | 373,050 | | | |
Kemble Water Structure, Ltd. |
GBP | 13,150 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 4.49%, Maturing October 13, 2013 | | | 16,610,763 | | | |
Sensus Metering Systems, Inc. |
| 7,391 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing June 3, 2013 | | | 7,418,416 | | | |
Wastequip, Inc. |
| 281 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing February 5, 2013 | | | 183,429 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 27,745,328 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronics / Electrical — 3.0% |
|
Aspect Software, Inc. |
| 3,502 | | | Term Loan, 3.31%, Maturing July 11, 2011 | | $ | 3,212,819 | | | |
Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. |
| 9,169 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing June 26, 2013 | | | 8,635,707 | | | |
FCI International S.A.S. |
| 331 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 301,842 | | | |
| 552 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 503,458 | | | |
| 552 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 503,458 | | | |
| 573 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 522,952 | | | |
| 992 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 905,384 | | | |
See notes to financial statements23
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Electronics / Electrical (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. |
| 29,815 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing December 1, 2013 | | $ | 24,307,655 | | | |
Infor Enterprise Solutions Holdings |
EUR | 2,917 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing July 28, 2012 | | | 3,837,353 | | | |
| 7,173 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing July 28, 2012 | | | 6,330,083 | | | |
| 19,323 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing July 28, 2012 | | | 17,052,855 | | | |
Network Solutions, LLC |
| 9,452 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing March 7, 2014 | | | 8,507,168 | | | |
Open Solutions, Inc. |
| 10,132 | | | Term Loan, 2.41%, Maturing January 23, 2014 | | | 8,224,110 | | | |
Sensata Technologies Finance Co. |
| 18,483 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing April 27, 2013 | | | 15,912,610 | | | |
Spectrum Brands, Inc. |
| 804 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing March 30, 2013 | | | 788,014 | | | |
| 15,635 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing March 30, 2013 | | | 15,330,400 | | | |
SS&C Technologies, Inc. |
| 3,028 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing November 23, 2012 | | | 2,906,436 | | | |
Vertafore, Inc. |
| 11,266 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 11,097,061 | | | |
| 1,975 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 1,928,094 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 130,807,459 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Equipment Leasing — 0.0% |
|
Hertz Corp. |
| 8 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing December 21, 2012 | | $ | 7,410 | | | |
| 835 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing December 21, 2012 | | | 781,243 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 788,653 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Farming / Agriculture — 0.3% |
|
BF Bolthouse HoldCo, LLC |
| 3,717 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing December 16, 2012 | | $ | 3,635,552 | | | |
Central Garden & Pet Co. |
| 9,843 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 9,367,667 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,003,219 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Financial Intermediaries — 1.6% |
|
Asset Acceptence Capital Corp. |
| 1,440 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 5, 2013 | | $ | 1,396,379 | | | |
Citco III, Ltd. |
| 13,812 | | | Term Loan, 2.85%, Maturing June 30, 2014 | | | 12,085,550 | | | |
E.A. Viner International Co. |
| 395 | | | Term Loan, 4.79%, Maturing July 31, 2013 | | | 373,124 | | | |
Grosvenor Capital Management |
| 5,729 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing December 5, 2013 | | | 5,213,526 | | | |
Jupiter Asset Management Group |
GBP | 3,644 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 30, 2015 | | | 5,651,191 | | | |
Lender Processing Services, Inc. |
| 5,040 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing July 2, 2014 | | | 5,011,814 | | | |
LPL Holdings, Inc. |
| 26,606 | | | Term Loan, 2.01%, Maturing December 18, 2014 | | | 25,142,351 | | | |
Nuveen Investments, Inc. |
| 3,977 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing November 2, 2014 | | | 3,444,079 | | | |
Oxford Acquisition III, Ltd. |
| 11,051 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing May 24, 2014 | | | 9,190,512 | | | |
RJO Holdings Corp. (RJ O’Brien) |
| 4,007 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 2,694,619 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 70,203,145 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 2.9% |
|
Acosta, Inc. |
| 16,913 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 28, 2013 | | $ | 16,119,855 | | | |
Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc. |
| 16,440 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing March 29, 2013 | | | 15,659,544 | | | |
American Seafoods Group, LLC |
| 1,930 | | | Term Loan, 4.03%, Maturing September 30, 2012 | | | 1,881,623 | | | |
BL Marketing, Ltd. |
GBP | 3,500 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing December 31, 2013 | | | 5,528,958 | | | |
GBP | 2,500 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.01%, Maturing June 30, 2015 | | | 3,692,811 | | | |
Dean Foods Co. |
| 26,531 | | | Term Loan, 1.66%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 24,856,063 | | | |
Dole Food Company, Inc. |
| 1,691 | | | Term Loan, 7.15%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 1,710,605 | | | |
| 2,324 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 2,351,344 | | | |
| 8,204 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 8,301,165 | | | |
MafCo Worldwide Corp. |
| 733 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing December 8, 2011 | | | 688,884 | | | |
Pinnacle Foods Finance, LLC |
| 4,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.90%, Maturing April 2, 2013(3) | | | 2,700,000 | | | |
| 30,959 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 29,063,083 | | | |
See notes to financial statements24
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Food Products (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Reddy Ice Group, Inc. |
| 12,335 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing August 9, 2012 | | $ | 11,039,825 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 123,593,760 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Service — 2.5% |
|
AFC Enterprises, Inc. |
| 1,611 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing May 11, 2011 | | $ | 1,623,305 | | | |
Aramark Corp. |
| 3,075 | | | Term Loan, 2.14%, Maturing January 26, 2014 | | | 2,827,627 | | | |
| 45,618 | | | Term Loan, 2.16%, Maturing January 26, 2014 | | | 41,949,126 | | | |
| 973 | | | Term Loan, 2.16%, Maturing January 26, 2014 | | | 887,893 | | | |
| 238 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing October 22, 2014 | | | 228,884 | | | |
Buffets, Inc. |
| 5,223 | | | Term Loan, 18.00%, Maturing April 30, 2012 | | | 5,334,465 | | | |
| 1,059 | | | Term Loan, 7.53%, Maturing November 1, 2013(2) | | | 931,568 | | | |
| 4,618 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 17.78%, Maturing November 1, 2013(2) | | | 4,063,656 | | | |
CBRL Group, Inc. |
| 662 | | | Term Loan, 1.96%, Maturing April 27, 2013 | | | 638,574 | | | |
| 6,557 | | | Term Loan, 1.98%, Maturing April 27, 2013 | | | 6,324,008 | | | |
JRD Holdings, Inc. |
| 2,887 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing June 26, 2014 | | | 2,778,467 | | | |
Maine Beverage Co., LLC |
| 1,925 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 30, 2010 | | | 1,780,625 | | | |
OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC |
| 1,067 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing May 9, 2013 | | | 891,841 | | | |
| 12,124 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 9, 2014 | | | 10,130,061 | | | |
QCE Finance, LLC |
| 8,894 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 7,200,119 | | | |
Sagittarius Restaurants, LLC |
| 4,299 | | | Term Loan, 9.75%, Maturing March 29, 2013 | | | 3,997,974 | | | |
Selecta |
CHF | 18,405 | | | Term Loan, 2.88%, Maturing June 28, 2015 | | | 13,365,448 | | | |
SSP Financing, Ltd. |
| 3,955 | | | Term Loan, 3.18%, Maturing June 15, 2014 | | | 2,060,303 | | | |
| 3,955 | | | Term Loan, 3.68%, Maturing June 15, 2015 | | | 2,060,303 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 109,074,247 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food / Drug Retailers — 2.4% |
|
General Nutrition Centers, Inc. |
| 21,691 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing September 16, 2013 | | $ | 20,131,787 | | | |
Pantry, Inc. (The) |
| 62 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 58,516 | | | |
| 6,706 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 6,358,568 | | | |
Rite Aid Corp. |
| 30,610 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing June 1, 2014 | | | 26,547,666 | | | |
| 13,952 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 13,114,673 | | | |
| 11,500 | | | Term Loan, 9.50%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 11,921,671 | | | |
Roundy’s Supermarkets, Inc. |
| 24,418 | | | Term Loan, 6.03%, Maturing November 3, 2011 | | | 24,092,049 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 102,224,930 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Forest Products — 1.6% |
|
Appleton Papers, Inc. |
| 11,403 | | | Term Loan, 6.63%, Maturing June 5, 2014 | | $ | 10,376,581 | | | |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. |
| 40,320 | | | Term Loan, 2.32%, Maturing December 20, 2012 | | | 38,920,266 | | | |
| 3,931 | | | Term Loan, 2.33%, Maturing December 20, 2012 | | | 3,794,356 | | | |
| 8,368 | | | Term Loan, 3.59%, Maturing December 23, 2014 | | | 8,328,425 | | | |
Xerium Technologies, Inc. |
| 8,852 | | | Term Loan, 5.78%, Maturing May 18, 2012 | | | 7,258,745 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 68,678,373 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care — 9.3% |
|
1-800 Contacts, Inc. |
| 3,990 | | | Term Loan, 7.70%, Maturing March 4, 2015 | | $ | 3,970,000 | | | |
Accellent, Inc. |
| 3,096 | | | Term Loan, 2.87%, Maturing November 22, 2012 | | | 2,943,568 | | | |
Alliance Imaging, Inc. |
| 4,635 | | | Term Loan, 2.86%, Maturing December 29, 2011 | | | 4,495,018 | | | |
American Medical Systems |
| 4,172 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 20, 2012 | | | 4,056,890 | | | |
AMN Healthcare, Inc. |
| 3,191 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing November 2, 2011 | | | 2,983,136 | | | |
AMR HoldCo, Inc. |
| 5,353 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing February 10, 2012 | | | 5,152,687 | | | |
Biomet, Inc. |
| 16,050 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing December 26, 2014 | | | 15,453,288 | | | |
EUR | 2,915 | | | Term Loan, 3.58%, Maturing December 26, 2014 | | | 4,105,465 | | | |
Cardinal Health 409, Inc. |
| 14,560 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing April 10, 2014 | | | 12,696,189 | | | |
See notes to financial statements25
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Health Care (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Carestream Health, Inc. |
| 15,489 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing April 30, 2013 | | $ | 14,523,716 | | | |
Carl Zeiss Vision Holding GmbH |
EUR | 6,371 | | | Term Loan, 2.93%, Maturing March 23, 2015 | | | 6,680,375 | | | |
Community Health Systems, Inc. |
| 2,135 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 1,993,990 | | | |
| 60,842 | | | Term Loan, 2.61%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 56,814,618 | | | |
Concentra, Inc. |
| 6,860 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 25, 2014 | | | 6,396,867 | | | |
CRC Health Corp. |
| 1,877 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing February 6, 2013 | | | 1,679,803 | | | |
| 3,783 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing February 6, 2013 | | | 3,385,785 | | | |
Dako EQT Project Delphi |
| 1,568 | | | Term Loan, 2.41%, Maturing June 12, 2016 | | | 1,286,007 | | | |
EUR | 3,099 | | | Term Loan, 2.81%, Maturing June 12, 2016 | | | 3,739,167 | | | |
DaVita, Inc. |
| 13,754 | | | Term Loan, 1.76%, Maturing October 5, 2012 | | | 13,230,151 | | | |
DJO Finance, LLC |
| 4,975 | | | Term Loan, 3.26%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 4,806,788 | | | |
Fenwal, Inc. |
| 509 | | | Term Loan, 2.62%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 445,555 | | | |
| 2,976 | | | Term Loan, 2.62%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 2,606,494 | | | |
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings |
| 6,630 | | | Term Loan, 1.66%, Maturing March 31, 2013 | | | 6,384,198 | | | |
Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. |
| 3,302 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing May 30, 2013 | | | 3,140,932 | | | |
HCA, Inc. |
| 56,481 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing November 18, 2013 | | | 52,711,375 | | | |
Health Management Association, Inc. |
| 25,193 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 23,432,575 | | | |
HealthSouth Corp. |
| 3,602 | | | Term Loan, 2.55%, Maturing March 10, 2013 | | | 3,440,308 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Term Loan, 2.65%, Maturing March 10, 2013 | | | 4,550,000 | | | |
| 2,965 | | | Term Loan, 4.05%, Maturing March 15, 2014 | | | 2,905,646 | | | |
Iasis Healthcare, LLC |
| 110 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 14, 2014 | | | 104,041 | | | |
| 319 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 14, 2014 | | | 300,640 | | | |
| 30 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 14, 2014 | | | 28,096 | | | |
Ikaria Acquisition, Inc. |
| 4,413 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing March 28, 2013 | | | 4,140,684 | | | |
IM U.S. Holdings, LLC |
| 6,520 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing June 26, 2014 | | | 6,177,395 | | | |
inVentiv Health, Inc. |
| 7,903 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing July 6, 2014 | | | 7,409,145 | | | |
LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. |
| 11,291 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing April 15, 2012 | | | 10,966,149 | | | |
MultiPlan Merger Corp. |
| 3,342 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 3,164,621 | | | |
| 4,891 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 4,631,969 | | | |
Mylan, Inc. |
| 13,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.55%, Maturing October 2, 2014 | | | 12,675,000 | | | |
National Mentor Holdings, Inc. |
| 8,776 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 7,904,185 | | | |
| 537 | | | Term Loan, 4.59%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 483,729 | | | |
Nyco Holdings |
| 5,311 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing December 29, 2014 | | | 4,925,681 | | | |
EUR | 6,019 | | | Term Loan, 2.93%, Maturing December 29, 2014 | | | 8,234,720 | | | |
| 5,311 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing December 29, 2015 | | | 4,925,681 | | | |
EUR | 6,019 | | | Term Loan, 3.68%, Maturing December 29, 2015 | | | 8,234,720 | | | |
Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. |
| 985 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing May 31, 2014 | | | 942,816 | | | |
RadNet Management, Inc. |
| 5,913 | | | Term Loan, 4.54%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 5,705,608 | | | |
ReAble Therapeutics Finance, LLC |
| 8,878 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing November 16, 2013 | | | 8,478,350 | | | |
Select Medical Holdings Corp. |
| 950 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.72%, Maturing February 24, 2010(3) | | | 855,000 | | | |
| 1,082 | | | Term Loan, 4.16%, Maturing August 5, 2014 | | | 1,062,175 | | | |
| 8,007 | | | Term Loan, 4.16%, Maturing August 5, 2014 | | | 8,026,607 | | | |
Sunrise Medical Holdings, Inc. |
| 3,534 | | | Term Loan, 8.25%, Maturing May 13, 2010 | | | 2,562,234 | | | |
TZ Merger Sub., Inc. (TriZetto) |
| 4,975 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing July 24, 2015 | | | 4,999,749 | | | |
Vanguard Health Holding Co., LLC |
| 11,583 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing September 23, 2011 | | | 11,322,137 | | | |
Viant Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,783 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 25, 2014 | | | 1,738,685 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 400,010,408 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Home Furnishings — 1.2% |
|
Dometic Corp. |
| 914 | | | Term Loan, 1.51%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | $ | 754,288 | | | |
| 2,057 | | | Term Loan, 1.51%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 1,028,575 | | | |
See notes to financial statements26
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Home Furnishings (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 1,029 | | | Term Loan, 3.76%, Maturing December 31, 2014(2) | | $ | 77,143 | | | |
Hunter Fan Co. |
| 3,612 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 16, 2014 | | | 2,600,792 | | | |
Interline Brands, Inc. |
| 1,323 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing June 23, 2013 | | | 1,220,596 | | | |
| 5,583 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 23, 2013 | | | 5,150,361 | | | |
National Bedding Co., LLC |
| 12,558 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing August 31, 2011 | | | 11,459,024 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.31%, Maturing August 31, 2012 | | | 1,215,000 | | | |
Oreck Corp. |
| 4,164 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing February 2, 2012(5)(7) | | | 1,495,021 | | | |
Simmons Co. |
| 25,024 | | | Term Loan, 10.50%, Maturing December 19, 2011 | | | 24,820,797 | | | |
| 2,726 | | | Term Loan, 7.35%, Maturing February 15, 2012(2) | | | 81,773 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 49,903,370 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Equipment — 2.3% |
|
Baxi Group, Ltd. |
EUR | 3,254 | | | Revolving Loan, 1.00%, Maturing December 27, 2010(3) | | $ | 3,567,178 | | | |
GBP | 1,297 | | | Term Loan, 3.66%, Maturing December 27, 2010 | | | 1,997,770 | | | |
| 500 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 27, 2011(4) | | | 470,875 | | | |
| 500 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 27, 2012(4) | | | 470,875 | | | |
Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services, Inc. |
| 9,960 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing February 7, 2014 | | | 9,013,799 | | | |
CEVA Group PLC U.S. |
| 330 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 278,738 | | | |
| 40 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 33,051 | | | |
EUR | 640 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 782,852 | | | |
EUR | 1,086 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 1,329,371 | | | |
EUR | 1,335 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 1,633,805 | | | |
EUR | 1,136 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 1,390,117 | | | |
EPD Holdings (Goodyear Engineering Products) |
| 2,361 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 13, 2014 | | | 1,910,621 | | | |
| 12,930 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 13, 2014 | | | 10,465,027 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.00%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 1,220,000 | | | |
Flowserve Corp. |
| 3,561 | | | Term Loan, 1.81%, Maturing August 10, 2012 | | | 3,489,643 | | | |
Generac Acquisition Corp. |
| 9,694 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing November 7, 2013 | | | 8,789,624 | | | |
Gleason Corp. |
| 1,518 | | | Term Loan, 2.09%, Maturing June 30, 2013 | | | 1,480,105 | | | |
| 1,941 | | | Term Loan, 2.09%, Maturing June 30, 2013 | | | 1,892,218 | | | |
Jason, Inc. |
| 1,740 | | | Term Loan, 5.03%, Maturing April 30, 2010 | | | 913,592 | | | |
John Maneely Co. |
| 20,958 | | | Term Loan, 3.51%, Maturing December 8, 2013 | | | 19,254,890 | | | |
KION Group GmbH |
EUR | 500 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 23, 2014(4) | | | 509,559 | | | |
| 3,750 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing December 23, 2014 | | | 2,582,812 | | | |
EUR | 500 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 23, 2015(4) | | | 509,559 | | | |
| 3,750 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing December 23, 2015 | | | 2,582,813 | | | |
Polypore, Inc. |
| 2,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.55%, Maturing July 3, 2013(3) | | | 1,630,000 | | | |
| 17,012 | | | Term Loan, 2.46%, Maturing July 3, 2014 | | | 15,927,594 | | | |
EUR | 1,089 | | | Term Loan, 2.64%, Maturing July 3, 2014 | | | 1,491,018 | | | |
TFS Acquisition Corp. |
| 4,401 | | | Term Loan, 14.00%, Maturing August 11, 2013(2) | | | 2,937,701 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 98,555,207 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 1.7% |
|
Alliant Holdings I, Inc. |
| 6,933 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing August 21, 2014 | | $ | 6,465,027 | | | |
Applied Systems, Inc. |
| 7,217 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing September 26, 2013 | | | 6,860,507 | | | |
CCC Information Services Group, Inc. |
| 7,302 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing February 10, 2013 | | | 7,092,467 | | | |
Conseco, Inc. |
| 23,033 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing October 10, 2013 | | | 20,863,743 | | | |
Crump Group, Inc. |
| 3,715 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing August 4, 2014 | | | 3,362,144 | | | |
Hub International Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,636 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 13, 2014 | | | 1,442,685 | | | |
| 11,650 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 13, 2014 | | | 10,276,130 | | | |
| 3,525 | | | Term Loan, Maturing June 30, 2014(4) | | | 3,454,500 | | | |
U.S.I. Holdings Corp. |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing May 4, 2014(4) | | | 1,950,000 | | | |
| 13,927 | | | Term Loan, 3.04%, Maturing May 4, 2014 | | | 12,127,689 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 73,894,892 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements27
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Leisure Goods / Activities / Movies — 5.3% |
|
24 Hour Fitness Worldwide, Inc. |
| 2,922 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing June 8, 2012 | | $ | 2,736,683 | | | |
AMC Entertainment, Inc. |
| 17,353 | | | Term Loan, 1.74%, Maturing January 26, 2013 | | | 16,431,004 | | | |
AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc. |
| 2,945 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 8, 2013 | | | 2,513,375 | | | |
Bombardier Recreational Products |
| 17,400 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing June 28, 2013 | | | 12,223,500 | | | |
Carmike Cinemas, Inc. |
| 5,213 | | | Term Loan, 3.54%, Maturing May 19, 2012 | | | 5,060,038 | | | |
| 6,956 | | | Term Loan, 4.24%, Maturing May 19, 2012 | | | 6,751,738 | | | |
Cedar Fair, L.P. |
| 2,211 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing August 31, 2011 | | | 2,129,889 | | | |
| 2,731 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing August 30, 2012 | | | 2,630,048 | | | |
| 7,447 | | | Term Loan, 4.24%, Maturing February 17, 2014 | | | 7,223,252 | | | |
| 3,773 | | | Term Loan, 4.27%, Maturing February 17, 2014 | | | 3,659,482 | | | |
Cinemark, Inc. |
| 24,097 | | | Term Loan, 2.07%, Maturing October 5, 2013 | | | 22,918,339 | | | |
Dave & Buster’s, Inc. |
| 815 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing March 8, 2013 | | | 799,147 | | | |
| 2,055 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing March 8, 2013 | | | 2,013,779 | | | |
Deluxe Entertainment Services |
| 4,576 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing January 28, 2011 | | | 4,278,378 | | | |
| 271 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing January 28, 2011 | | | 253,791 | | | |
| 471 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing January 28, 2011 | | | 440,759 | | | |
DW Funding, LLC |
| 2,922 | | | Term Loan, 2.17%, Maturing April 30, 2011 | | | 2,556,701 | | | |
Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. |
| 5,727 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing March 16, 2012 | | | 5,433,435 | | | |
Fender Musical Instruments Corp. |
| 1,297 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 9, 2014 | | | 1,108,850 | | | |
| 4,523 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 9, 2014 | | | 3,866,767 | | | |
Mega Blocks, Inc. |
| 1,867 | | | Term Loan, 9.75%, Maturing July 26, 2012 | | | 1,073,323 | | | |
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Holdings, Inc. |
| 37,477 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing April 8, 2012(5) | | | 21,567,755 | | | |
National CineMedia, LLC |
| 14,250 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing February 13, 2015 | | | 13,332,656 | | | |
Odeon |
GBP | 624 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing April 2, 2015 | | | 944,934 | | | |
GBP | 624 | | | Term Loan, 3.65%, Maturing April 2, 2016 | | | 944,934 | | | |
Red Football, Ltd. |
GBP | 1,576 | | | Term Loan, 3.02%, Maturing August 16, 2014 | | | 2,372,985 | | | |
GBP | 1,576 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing August 16, 2015 | | | 2,372,985 | | | |
Regal Cinemas Corp. |
| 18,380 | | | Term Loan, 4.03%, Maturing November 10, 2010 | | | 18,257,030 | | | |
Revolution Studios Distribution Co., LLC |
| 5,591 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing December 21, 2014 | | | 5,087,601 | | | |
Six Flags Theme Parks, Inc. |
| 12,327 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing April 30, 2015 | | | 12,090,028 | | | |
Southwest Sports Group, LLC |
| 9,500 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing December 22, 2010 | | | 7,980,000 | | | |
Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. |
| 8,996 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing June 9, 2011 | | | 8,973,597 | | | |
| 15,900 | | | Term Loan, Maturing November 6, 2014(4) | | | 15,661,500 | | | |
Zuffa, LLC |
| 4,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 1.75%, Maturing June 19, 2012(3) | | | 3,320,000 | | | |
| 9,142 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing June 20, 2016 | | | 8,250,508 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 227,258,791 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lodging and Casinos — 2.6% |
|
Choctaw Resort Development Enterprise |
| 2,308 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing November 4, 2011 | | $ | 2,296,752 | | | |
Full Moon Holdco 3, Ltd. |
GBP | 1,500 | | | Term Loan, 3.86%, Maturing November 20, 2014 | | | 2,158,243 | | | |
GBP | 1,500 | | | Term Loan, 4.36%, Maturing November 20, 2015 | | | 2,158,243 | | | |
Gala Electric Casinos, Ltd. |
GBP | 1,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 12, 2013(4) | | | 1,440,145 | | | |
GBP | 1,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 12, 2014(4) | | | 1,440,247 | | | |
Green Valley Ranch Gaming, LLC |
| 6,961 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing February 16, 2014 | | | 4,916,555 | | | |
Harrah’s Operating Co. |
| 4,051 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing January 28, 2015 | | | 3,232,577 | | | |
| 2,391 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing January 28, 2015 | | | 1,910,913 | | | |
| 8,000 | | | Term Loan, 9.50%, Maturing October 31, 2016 | | | 7,837,776 | | | |
Herbst Gaming, Inc. |
| 2,319 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing December 2, 2011(5) | | | 1,288,868 | | | |
| 6,245 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing December 2, 2011(5) | | | 3,471,064 | | | |
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. |
| 535 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing November 30, 2013 | | | 503,711 | | | |
| 3,562 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing November 30, 2013 | | | 3,353,584 | | | |
See notes to financial statements28
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Lodging and Casinos (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 5,436 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing November 30, 2013 | | $ | 5,117,665 | | | |
LodgeNet Entertainment Corp. |
| 11,499 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing April 4, 2014 | | | 10,559,946 | | | |
New World Gaming Partners, Ltd. |
| 949 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing June 30, 2014 | | | 786,812 | | | |
| 9,600 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing June 30, 2014 | | | 7,955,871 | | | |
Penn National Gaming, Inc. |
| 17,077 | | | Term Loan, 2.01%, Maturing October 3, 2012 | | | 16,551,736 | | | |
Scandic Hotels |
EUR | 1,725 | | | Term Loan, 3.60%, Maturing April 25, 2015 | | | 1,947,886 | | | |
EUR | 1,725 | | | Term Loan, 3.97%, Maturing April 25, 2016 | | | 1,947,886 | | | |
Venetian Casino Resort/Las Vegas Sands, Inc. |
| 8,894 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 14, 2014 | | | 7,259,796 | | | |
| 22,808 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 23, 2014 | | | 18,617,302 | | | |
VML US Finance, LLC |
| 3,317 | | | Term Loan, 5.79%, Maturing May 25, 2012 | | | 3,082,842 | | | |
| 1,990 | | | Term Loan, 5.79%, Maturing May 25, 2013 | | | 1,849,705 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 111,686,125 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Nonferrous Metals / Minerals — 0.8% |
|
Compass Minerals Group, Inc. |
| 1,274 | | | Term Loan, 1.76%, Maturing December 22, 2012 | | $ | 1,260,765 | | | |
Euramax International, Inc. |
GBP | 473 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 469,355 | | | |
| 744 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 450,151 | | | |
GBP | 468 | | | Term Loan, 14.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013(2) | | | 465,008 | | | |
| 730 | | | Term Loan, 14.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013(2) | | | 441,871 | | | |
Noranda Aluminum Acquisition |
| 6,772 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing May 18, 2014 | | | 5,501,878 | | | |
Novelis, Inc. |
| 1,994 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing June 28, 2014 | | | 1,800,624 | | | |
| 4,387 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing June 28, 2014 | | | 3,961,487 | | | |
Oxbow Carbon and Mineral Holdings |
| 15,827 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing May 8, 2014 | | | 15,055,145 | | | |
| 1,510 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing May 8, 2014 | | | 1,436,065 | | | |
Tube City IMS Corp. |
| 476 | | | Term Loan, 1.83%, Maturing January 25, 2014 | | | 442,159 | | | |
| 3,827 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing January 25, 2014 | | | 3,556,617 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 34,841,125 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas — 1.7% |
|
Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P. |
| 5,186 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing July 20, 2014 | | $ | 5,101,750 | | | |
Citgo Petroleum Corp. |
| 5,753 | | | Term Loan, 1.72%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 5,432,858 | | | |
Dresser, Inc. |
| 13,095 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing May 4, 2014 | | | 12,278,874 | | | |
Dynegy Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,642 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing April 2, 2013 | | | 1,581,275 | | | |
| 30,804 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing April 2, 2013 | | | 29,670,217 | | | |
Enterprise GP Holdings, L.P. |
| 2,376 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing October 31, 2014 | | | 2,298,780 | | | |
Hercules Offshore, Inc. |
| 3,965 | | | Term Loan, 8.50%, Maturing July 6, 2013 | | | 3,829,619 | | | |
Precision Drilling Corp. |
| 4,000 | | | Term Loan, 4.58%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 3,940,000 | | | |
| 4,813 | | | Term Loan, 9.25%, Maturing September 30, 2014 | | | 4,836,563 | | | |
Targa Resources, Inc. |
| 1,177 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing October 31, 2012 | | | 1,158,184 | | | |
| 1,351 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing October 31, 2012 | | | 1,329,906 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 71,458,026 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Publishing — 7.0% |
|
American Media Operations, Inc. |
| 24,072 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing January 31, 2013(2) | | $ | 21,860,143 | | | |
Aster Zweite Beteiligungs GmbH |
| 6,825 | | | Term Loan, 2.89%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 5,924,100 | | | |
EUR | 708 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 907,117 | | | |
Black Press US Partnership |
| 1,231 | | | Term Loan, 2.37%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 806,453 | | | |
| 2,028 | | | Term Loan, 2.37%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 1,328,275 | | | |
CanWest MediaWorks, Ltd. |
| 5,270 | | | Term Loan, 4.75%, Maturing July 10, 2014 | | | 4,242,752 | | | |
Dex Media West, LLC |
| 3,822 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing October 24, 2014 | | | 3,375,774 | | | |
GateHouse Media Operating, Inc. |
| 4,916 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 1,913,162 | | | |
| 15,664 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 6,095,895 | | | |
| 9,350 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 3,638,711 | | | |
Getty Images, Inc. |
| 10,579 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing July 2, 2015 | | | 10,653,440 | | | |
Hanley-Wood, LLC |
| 7,369 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing March 8, 2014 | | | 3,159,352 | | | |
See notes to financial statements29
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Publishing (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Idearc, Inc. |
| 41,609 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing November 17, 2014(5) | | $ | 19,028,815 | | | |
Lamar Media Corp. |
| 5,924 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing March 31, 2013 | | | 5,912,872 | | | |
Laureate Education, Inc. |
| 2,117 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing August 17, 2014 | | | 1,929,462 | | | |
| 14,141 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing August 17, 2014 | | | 12,889,278 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing August 31, 2014 | | | 3,000,000 | | | |
Local Insight Regatta Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,683 | | | Term Loan, 7.75%, Maturing April 23, 2015 | | | 1,321,209 | | | |
MediaNews Group, Inc. |
| 7,330 | | | Term Loan, 4.74%, Maturing August 25, 2010 | | | 2,267,787 | | | |
| 3,343 | | | Term Loan, 4.74%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 1,034,368 | | | |
Mediannuaire Holding |
EUR | 4,100 | | | Term Loan, 1.93%, Maturing October 24, 2013 | | | 5,356,858 | | | |
EUR | 1,871 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 1,990,219 | | | |
EUR | 1,871 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing October 10, 2015 | | | 1,989,669 | | | |
Merrill Communications, LLC |
| 9,854 | | | Term Loan, 8.50%, Maturing December 24, 2012 | | | 7,821,803 | | | |
Nelson Education, Ltd. |
| 294 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing July 5, 2014 | | | 258,720 | | | |
Newspaper Holdings, Inc. |
| 18,303 | | | Term Loan, 1.81%, Maturing July 24, 2014 | | | 10,066,630 | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC |
| 39,007 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing August 9, 2013 | | | 36,406,362 | | | |
| 6,900 | | | Term Loan, 3.99%, Maturing May 1, 2016 | | | 6,491,741 | | | |
Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC |
| 2,061 | | | Term Loan, 12.50%, Maturing March 30, 2010 | | | 2,075,541 | | | |
| 5,003 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013(5) | | | 1,150,608 | | | |
R.H. Donnelley, Inc. |
| 1,612 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing June 30, 2011 | | | 1,413,174 | | | |
Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. (The) |
| 7,596 | | | DIP Loan, 13.50%, Maturing August 21, 2010 | | | 7,912,213 | | | |
| 8,161 | | | Revolving Loan, 4.54%, Maturing March 3, 2014 | | | 4,011,077 | | | |
| 32,865 | | | Term Loan, 4.25%, Maturing March 3, 2014 | | | 16,153,179 | | | |
| 2,934 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing March 3, 2014 | | | 1,442,170 | | | |
SGS International, Inc. |
| 1,047 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing December 30, 2011 | | | 1,002,340 | | | |
| 971 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing December 30, 2011 | | | 929,911 | | | |
Source Interlink Companies, Inc. |
| 1,801 | | | Term Loan, 10.75%, Maturing June 18, 2012 | | | 1,773,671 | | | |
| 2,290 | | | Term Loan, 10.75%, Maturing June 18, 2013 | | | 1,889,169 | | | |
| 1,195 | | | Term Loan, 15.00%, Maturing June 18, 2013(2) | | | 418,100 | | | |
Source Media, Inc. |
| 10,299 | | | Term Loan, 5.29%, Maturing November 8, 2011 | | | 8,548,507 | | | |
Springer Science+Business Media S.A. |
| 845 | | | Term Loan, 3.10%, Maturing May 5, 2010 | | | 794,834 | | | |
Star Tribune Co. (The) |
| 1,262 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing September 28, 2014(7) | | | 1,003,469 | | | |
| 841 | | | Term Loan, 11.00%, Maturing September 28, 2014(7) | | | 585,673 | | | |
Trader Media Corp. |
GBP | 12,137 | | | Term Loan, 2.64%, Maturing March 23, 2015 | | | 17,055,896 | | | |
Tribune Co. |
| 1,667 | | | DIP Revolving Loan, 3.50%, Maturing April 10, 2010(3) | | | 1,625,000 | | | |
| 1,667 | | | DIP Term Loan, 9.00%, Maturing April 10, 2010(3) | | | 1,675,000 | | | |
| 4,791 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing April 10, 2010(5) | | | 2,231,739 | | | |
| 8,553 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing May 17, 2014(5) | | | 4,052,015 | | | |
| 18,925 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing May 17, 2014(5) | | | 8,549,880 | | | |
Xsys, Inc. |
| 7,702 | | | Term Loan, 2.89%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 6,684,967 | | | |
EUR | 792 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 1,013,387 | | | |
EUR | 2,750 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 3,520,925 | | | |
| 7,867 | | | Term Loan, 2.89%, Maturing September 27, 2014 | | | 6,828,178 | | | |
EUR | 2,690 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing September 27, 2014 | | | 3,443,764 | | | |
EUR | 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.40%, Maturing September 27, 2015 | | | 848,652 | | | |
Yell Group, PLC |
| 8,025 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing February 10, 2013 | | | 5,778,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 296,082,006 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Radio and Television — 5.4% |
|
Block Communications, Inc. |
| 6,839 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing December 22, 2011 | | $ | 6,325,693 | | | |
Citadel Broadcasting Corp. |
| 32,925 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 12, 2014 | | | 22,677,094 | | | |
See notes to financial statements30
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Radio and Television (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
CMP Susquehanna Corp. |
| 3,815 | | | Revolving Loan, 2.43%, Maturing May 5, 2011(3) | | $ | 2,689,401 | | | |
| 10,022 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 7,433,309 | | | |
Cumulus Media, Inc. |
| 12,721 | | | Term Loan, 4.25%, Maturing June 11, 2014 | | | 10,478,876 | | | |
Discovery Communications, Inc. |
| 4,754 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 4,624,458 | | | |
Emmis Operating Co. |
| 6,892 | | | Term Loan, 4.28%, Maturing November 2, 2013 | | | 5,301,226 | | | |
Gray Television, Inc. |
| 8,418 | | | Term Loan, 3.79%, Maturing January 19, 2015 | | | 7,255,094 | | | |
HIT Entertainment, Inc. |
| 1,446 | | | Term Loan, 2.73%, Maturing March 20, 2012 | | | 1,266,954 | | | |
Intelsat Corp. |
| 18,494 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 17,514,223 | | | |
| 18,488 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 17,508,910 | | | |
| 18,488 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 17,508,910 | | | |
Ion Media Networks, Inc. |
| 2,381 | | | DIP Loan, 10.17%, Maturing May 29, 2010(3)(7) | | | 3,745,058 | | | |
| 14,925 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing January 15, 2012(5) | | | 3,780,995 | | | |
Local TV Finance, LLC |
| 1,955 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing May 7, 2013 | | | 1,573,775 | | | |
NEP II, Inc. |
| 4,565 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing February 16, 2014 | | | 4,222,185 | | | |
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. |
| 9,783 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing October 1, 2012 | | | 8,780,192 | | | |
| 9,197 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing October 1, 2012 | | | 8,254,163 | | | |
Raycom TV Broadcasting, LLC |
| 8,333 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing June 25, 2014 | | | 6,916,699 | | | |
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. |
| 11,663 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 10, 2012 | | | 9,680,411 | | | |
Tyrol Acquisition 2 SAS |
EUR | 6,300 | | | Term Loan, 2.43%, Maturing January 19, 2015 | | | 8,061,483 | | | |
EUR | 6,300 | | | Term Loan, 3.40%, Maturing January 19, 2016 | | | 8,061,483 | | | |
Univision Communications, Inc. |
| 52,733 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing September 29, 2014 | | | 42,638,554 | | | |
Young Broadcasting, Inc. |
| 973 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing November 3, 2012(5) | | | 634,556 | | | |
| 8,285 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing November 3, 2012(5) | | | 5,405,653 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 232,339,355 | | | |
|
|
|
Rail Industries — 0.2% |
|
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. |
| 7,835 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing April 26, 2013 | | $ | 7,443,572 | | | |
| 1,955 | | | Term Loan, 1.78%, Maturing April 28, 2013 | | | 1,808,375 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,251,947 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Retailers (Except Food and Drug) — 2.0% |
|
American Achievement Corp. |
| 2,685 | | | Term Loan, 6.26%, Maturing March 25, 2011 | | $ | 2,416,875 | | | |
Amscan Holdings, Inc. |
| 4,363 | | | Term Loan, 2.65%, Maturing May 25, 2013 | | | 3,963,171 | | | |
Cumberland Farms, Inc. |
| 2,846 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing September 29, 2013 | | | 2,604,320 | | | |
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. |
| 5,998 | | | Term Loan, 9.75%, Maturing July 15, 2010 | | | 6,020,360 | | | |
Josten’s Corp. |
| 5,046 | | | Term Loan, 2.32%, Maturing October 4, 2011 | | | 5,004,370 | | | |
Mapco Express, Inc. |
| 3,489 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing April 28, 2011 | | | 3,227,236 | | | |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. |
| 2,967 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing April 5, 2013 | | | 2,552,652 | | | |
Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. |
| 9,560 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 8,490,408 | | | |
Oriental Trading Co., Inc. |
| 17,365 | | | Term Loan, 9.75%, Maturing July 31, 2013 | | | 14,434,732 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.24%, Maturing January 31, 2013 | | | 485,000 | | | |
Rent-A-Center, Inc. |
| 5,310 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 5,203,420 | | | |
Rover Acquisition Corp. |
| 2,935 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing October 26, 2013 | | | 2,829,816 | | | |
Savers, Inc. |
| 2,748 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing August 11, 2012 | | | 2,651,350 | | | |
| 3,006 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing August 11, 2012 | | | 2,901,005 | | | |
Vivarte |
EUR | 63 | | | Term Loan, 2.43%, Maturing May 29, 2015 | | | 75,293 | | | |
EUR | 244 | | | Term Loan, 2.43%, Maturing May 29, 2015 | | | 292,806 | | | |
EUR | 4,614 | | | Term Loan, 2.43%, Maturing May 29, 2015 | | | 5,533,827 | | | |
EUR | 63 | | | Term Loan, 2.93%, Maturing May 29, 2016 | | | 75,293 | | | |
EUR | 244 | | | Term Loan, 2.93%, Maturing May 29, 2016 | | | 292,806 | | | |
EUR | 4,614 | | | Term Loan, 2.93%, Maturing May 29, 2016 | | | 5,533,827 | | | |
Yankee Candle Company, Inc. (The) |
| 12,867 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing February 6, 2014 | | | 12,047,052 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 86,635,619 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements31
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Steel — 0.2% |
|
Algoma Acquisition Corp. |
| 7,259 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing June 20, 2013 | | $ | 6,853,850 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,853,850 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Surface Transport — 0.5% |
|
Oshkosh Truck Corp. |
| 10,698 | | | Term Loan, 6.32%, Maturing December 6, 2013 | | $ | 10,705,357 | | | |
Swift Transportation Co., Inc. |
| 6,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.54%, Maturing May 10, 2012 | | | 4,990,002 | | | |
| 5,070 | | | Term Loan, 3.56%, Maturing May 10, 2014 | | | 4,380,911 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 20,076,270 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications — 3.0% |
|
Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc. |
| 2,613 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing February 1, 2012 | | $ | 2,503,585 | | | |
| 10,112 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing February 1, 2012 | | | 9,689,534 | | | |
Asurion Corp. |
| 20,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing July 13, 2012 | | | 19,019,440 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.74%, Maturing January 13, 2013 | | | 1,904,376 | | | |
BCM Luxembourg, Ltd. |
EUR | 4,962 | | | Term Loan, 2.30%, Maturing September 30, 2014 | | | 6,442,995 | | | |
EUR | 4,962 | | | Term Loan, 2.55%, Maturing September 30, 2015 | | | 6,443,351 | | | |
Cellular South, Inc. |
| 6,783 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 29, 2014 | | | 6,511,311 | | | |
| 2,974 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 29, 2014 | | | 2,854,845 | | | |
Centennial Cellular Operating Co., LLC |
| 4,500 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.50%, Maturing February 9, 2010(3) | | | 4,252,500 | | | |
| 8,275 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing February 9, 2011 | | | 8,240,109 | | | |
CommScope, Inc. |
| 10,750 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing November 19, 2014 | | | 10,421,762 | | | |
Crown Castle Operating Co. |
| 3,980 | | | Term Loan, 1.78%, Maturing January 9, 2014 | | | 3,831,463 | | | |
Intelsat Subsidiary Holding Co. |
| 7,578 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing July 3, 2013 | | | 7,293,797 | | | |
Iowa Telecommunications Services |
| 2,500 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing November 23, 2011 | | | 2,411,328 | | | |
IPC Systems, Inc. |
| 8,571 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing May 31, 2014 | | | 7,328,556 | | | |
GBP | 345 | | | Term Loan, 2.80%, Maturing May 31, 2014 | | | 407,527 | | | |
Macquarie UK Broadcast Ventures, Ltd. |
GBP | 6,867 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing December 26, 2014 | | | 9,749,088 | | | |
NTelos, Inc. |
| 6,000 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing August 13, 2015 | | | 6,042,498 | | | |
Palm, Inc. |
| 5,733 | | | Term Loan, 3.79%, Maturing April 24, 2014 | | | 5,083,262 | | | |
Telesat Canada, Inc. |
| 2,770 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing October 22, 2014 | | | 2,664,837 | | | |
Windstream Corp. |
| 4,289 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing December 17, 2015 | | | 4,172,101 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 127,268,265 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Utilities — 2.8% |
|
AEI Finance Holding, LLC |
| 2,114 | | | Revolving Loan, 3.24%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | $ | 1,961,179 | | | |
| 14,345 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing March 30, 2014 | | | 13,304,543 | | | |
BRSP, LLC |
| 4,500 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing June 24, 2014 | | | 4,230,000 | | | |
Calpine Corp. |
| 30,890 | | | DIP Loan, 3.17%, Maturing March 29, 2014 | | | 28,481,347 | | | |
Covanta Energy Corp. |
| 2,789 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing February 9, 2014 | | | 2,656,548 | | | |
| 1,903 | | | Term Loan, 1.79%, Maturing February 9, 2014 | | | 1,812,653 | | | |
Electricinvest Holding Co. |
EUR | 4,170 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, Maturing October 24, 2012(4) | | | 4,909,886 | | | |
NRG Energy, Inc. |
| 18,577 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing June 1, 2014 | | | 17,523,938 | | | |
| 13,198 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing June 1, 2014 | | | 12,450,001 | | | |
NSG Holdings, LLC |
| 202 | | | Term Loan, 1.80%, Maturing June 15, 2014 | | | 192,359 | | | |
| 1,207 | | | Term Loan, 1.80%, Maturing June 15, 2014 | | | 1,147,079 | | | |
TXU Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co., LLC |
| 4,992 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 3,891,964 | | | |
| 9,208 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 7,090,494 | | | |
| 20,665 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 16,063,679 | | | |
See notes to financial statements32
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Utilities (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Vulcan Energy Corp. |
| 3,278 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing December 31, 2015 | | $ | 3,312,591 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 119,028,261 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Senior Floating-Rate Interests | | |
(identified cost $4,581,707,890) | | $ | 4,215,909,716 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes — 0.4% |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Building and Development — 0.2% |
|
Grohe Holding GmbH, Variable Rate |
EUR | 5,000 | | | 3.617%, 1/15/14(8) | | $ | 6,107,351 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,107,351 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics — 0.0% |
|
Wellman Holdings, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes |
| 1,049 | | | 5.00%, 1/29/19(7) | | $ | 386,032 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 386,032 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.0% |
|
Environmental Systems Product Holdings, Inc., Junior Notes |
| 149 | | | 18.00%, 3/31/15(2)(7) | | $ | 119,296 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 119,296 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronics / Electrical — 0.1% |
|
NXP BV/NXP Funding, LLC, Variable Rate |
| 6,300 | | | 3.034%, 10/15/13 | | $ | 4,780,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,780,125 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Radio and Television — 0.0% |
|
Ion Media Networks, Inc., Variable Rate |
| 3,000 | | | 0.00%, 1/15/12(5)(9) | | $ | 780,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 780,000 | | | |
|
|
|
Telecommunications — 0.1% |
|
Qwest Corp., Sr. Notes, Variable Rate |
| 5,850 | | | 3.549%, 6/15/13 | | $ | 5,469,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,469,750 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes | | |
(identified cost $21,935,648) | | $ | 17,642,554 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-Backed Securities — 0.1% |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 877 | | | Alzette European CLO SA, Series 2004-1A, Class E2, 7.273%, 12/15/20(10) | | $ | 87,732 | | | |
| 2,632 | | | Assemblies of God Financial Real Estate, Series 2004-1A, Class A, 6.90%, 6/15/29(9)(10) | | | 2,534,088 | | | |
| 1,044 | | | Avalon Capital Ltd. 3, Series 1A, Class D, 2.357%, 2/24/19(9)(10) | | | 666,258 | | | |
| 1,129 | | | Babson Ltd., Series 2005-1A, Class C1, 2.234%, 4/15/19(9)(10) | | | 731,485 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Bryant Park CDO Ltd., Series 2005-1A, Class C, 2.334%, 1/15/19(9)(10) | | | 227,850 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Carlyle High Yield Partners, Series 2004-6A, Class C, 2.911%, 8/11/16(9)(10) | | | 639,300 | | | |
| 871 | | | Centurion CDO 8 Ltd., Series 2005-8A, Class D, 5.814%, 3/8/17(10) | | | 514,218 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Morgan Stanley Investment Management Croton, Ltd., Series 2005-1A, Class D, 2.234%, 1/15/18(9)(10) | | | 1,007,600 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Asset-Backed Securities | | |
(identified cost $11,496,956) | | $ | 6,408,531 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 0.1% |
|
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Automotive — 0.0% |
|
| 105,145 | | | Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.(11) | | $ | 3,775 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,775 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building and Development — 0.1% |
|
| 23,625 | | | Lafarge Roofing(7)(11) | | $ | 0 | | | |
| 231,354 | | | Sanitec Europe OY B Units(7)(11) | | | 316,639 | | | |
| 231,354 | | | Sanitec Europe OY E Units(7)(11) | | | 0 | | | |
See notes to financial statements33
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Building and Development (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 3,646 | | | United Subcontractors, Inc.(7)(11) | | $ | 293,917 | | | |
| 22,273 | | | WCI Communities, Inc.(11) | | | 1,559,082 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,169,638 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics — 0.0% |
|
| 3,849 | | | Vita Cayman II, Ltd. | | $ | 164,267 | | | |
| 1,022 | | | Wellman Holdings, Inc.(7)(11) | | | 366,990 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 531,257 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.0% |
|
| 2,484 | | | Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc.(7)(11)(12) | | $ | 34,602 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 34,602 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Service — 0.0% |
|
| 193,076 | | | Buffets, Inc.(11) | | $ | 1,254,994 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,254,994 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Home Furnishings — 0.0% |
|
| 364 | | | Dometic Corp.(7)(11) | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Publishing — 0.0% |
|
| 5,725 | | | Source Interlink Companies, Inc.(7)(11) | | $ | 41,220 | | | |
| 30,631 | | | Star Tribune Co. (The)(7)(11) | | | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 41,220 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $4,469,920) | | $ | 4,035,486 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred Stocks — 0.0% |
|
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Automotive — 0.0% |
|
| 350 | | | Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc., Series A, Convertible(11)(12) | | $ | 91 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 91 | | | |
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.0% |
|
| 1,138 | | | Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc., Series A(7)(11)(12) | | $ | 91,040 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 91,040 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Preferred Stocks | | |
(identified cost $37,415) | | $ | 91,131 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Closed-End Investment Companies — 0.0% |
|
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
| 4,000 | | | Pioneer Floating Rate Trust | | $ | 44,040 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Closed-End Investment Companies | | |
(identified cost $72,148) | | $ | 44,040 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 4.0% |
|
Interest/
| | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 165,515 | | | Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(13) | | $ | 165,515,197 | | | |
| 7,299 | | | State Street Bank and Trust Euro Time Deposit, 0.01%, 11/2/09 | | $ | 7,298,860 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $172,814,057) | | $ | 172,814,057 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 102.8% | | |
(identified cost $4,792,534,034) | | $ | 4,416,945,515 | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | |
Less Unfunded Loan Commitments — (1.5)% | | $ | (66,166,734 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
Net Investments — 101.3% | | |
(identified cost $4,726,367,300) | | $ | 4,350,778,781 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (1.3)% | | $ | (56,438,713 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 4,294,340,068 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
DIP - Debtor in Possession
REIT - Real Estate Investment Trust
CHF - Swiss Franc
EUR - Euro
GBP - British Pound Sterling
See notes to financial statements34
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | |
* | | In U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. |
|
(1) | | Senior floating-rate interests (Senior Loans) often require prepayments from excess cash flows or permit the borrowers to repay at their election. The degree to which borrowers repay, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, cannot be predicted with accuracy. As a result, the actual remaining maturity may be substantially less than the stated maturities shown. However, Senior Loans will have an expected average life of approximately two to four years. The stated interest rate represents the weighted average interest rate of all contracts within the senior loan facility and includes commitment fees on unfunded loan commitments, if any. Senior Loans typically have rates of interest which are redetermined either daily, monthly, quarterly or semi-annually by reference to a base lending rate, plus a premium. These base rates are primarily the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and secondarily, the prime rate offered by one or more major United States banks (the “Prime Rate”) and the certificate of deposit (“CD”) rate or other base lending rates used by commercial lenders. |
|
(2) | | Represents a payment-in-kind security which may pay all or a portion of interest in additional par. |
|
(3) | | Unfunded or partially unfunded loan commitments. See Note 1G for description. |
|
(4) | | This Senior Loan will settle after October 31, 2009, at which time the interest rate will be determined. |
|
(5) | | Currently the issuer is in default with respect to interest payments. |
|
(6) | | Defaulted matured security. |
|
(7) | | Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees. |
|
(8) | | Security exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, which exempts from registration securities offered and sold outside the United States. Security may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. |
|
(9) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $7,100,799 or 0.2% of the Portfolio’s net assets. |
|
(10) | | Variable rate security. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at October 31, 2009. |
|
(11) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(12) | | Restricted security (see Note 5). |
|
(13) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements35
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $4,560,852,103) | | $ | 4,185,263,584 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $165,515,197) | | | 165,515,197 | | | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $22,498,571) | | | 22,456,682 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 15,386,380 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 38,387,913 | | | |
Receivable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 1,219,097 | | | |
Receivable for closed swap contracts | | | 73,813 | | | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 186,528 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 4,428,489,194 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 131,259,920 | | | |
Payable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 414,446 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 1,903,571 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 4,208 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 566,981 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 134,149,126 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 4,294,340,068 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 4,668,753,430 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | | (374,413,362 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 4,294,340,068 | | | |
|
|
Statement of Operations
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 209,771,896 | | | |
Dividends | | | 4,840 | | | |
Interest allocated from affiliated investment | | | 1,053,523 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (898,921 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 209,931,338 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 17,642,597 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 50,500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 770,672 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 1,100,565 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 674,120 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 247,483 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 20,485,937 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 5,743 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 5,743 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 20,480,194 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 189,451,144 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (183,759,510 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | 332,259 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (30,966,324 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (214,393,575 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 966,507,229 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (6,686,629 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 959,820,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 745,427,025 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 934,878,169 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements36
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 189,451,144 | | | $ | 300,321,531 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (214,393,575 | ) | | | (60,661,120 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, swap contracts, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 959,820,600 | | | | (1,233,858,485 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 934,878,169 | | | $ | (994,198,074 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 1,462,810,319 | | | $ | 1,218,146,557 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (1,159,558,768 | ) | | | (4,019,337,678 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | 303,251,551 | | | $ | (2,801,191,121 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 1,238,129,720 | | | $ | (3,795,389,195 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 3,056,210,348 | | | $ | 6,851,599,543 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 4,294,340,068 | | | $ | 3,056,210,348 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements37
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1) | | | 0.61 | % | | | 0.70 | % | | | 0.58 | % | | | 0.54 | % | | | 0.54 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.41 | % | | | 6.50 | % | | | 6.94 | % | | | 6.44 | % | | | 4.68 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 27.54 | % | | | (22.24 | )% | | | 4.62 | % | | | 6.36 | % | | | 4.77 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 4,294,340 | | | $ | 3,056,210 | | | $ | 6,851,600 | | | $ | 7,430,493 | | | $ | 6,506,058 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements38
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Floating Rate Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to provide a high level of current income. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund, Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund, Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund and Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund held an interest of 65.8%, 16.5%, 12.6%, 2.4% and 0.8%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Interests in senior floating-rate loans (Senior Loans) for which reliable market quotations are readily available are valued generally at the average mean of bid and ask quotations obtained from a third party pricing service. Other Senior Loans are valued at fair value by the investment adviser under procedures approved by the Trustees. In fair valuing a Senior Loan, the investment adviser utilizes one or more of the valuation techniques described in (i) through (iii) below to assess the likelihood that the borrower will make a full repayment of the loan underlying such Senior Loan relative to yields on other Senior Loans issued by companies of comparable credit quality. If the investment adviser believes that there is a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using a matrix pricing approach that considers the yield on the Senior Loan. If the investment adviser believes there is not a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using analyses that include, but are not limited to: (i) a comparison of the value of the borrower’s outstanding equity and debt to that of comparable public companies; (ii) a discounted cash flow analysis; or (iii) when the investment adviser believes it is likely that a borrower will be liquidated or sold, an analysis of the terms of such liquidation or sale. In certain cases, the investment adviser will use a combination of analytical methods to determine fair value, such as when only a
portion of a borrower’s assets are likely to be sold. In conducting its assessment and analyses for purposes of determining fair value of a Senior Loan, the investment adviser will use its discretion and judgment in considering and appraising relevant factors. Fair value determinations are made by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio based on information available to such managers. The portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may not possess the same information about a Senior Loan borrower as the portfolio managers of the Portfolio. At times, the fair value of a Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may vary from the fair value of the same Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio. The fair value of each Senior Loan is periodically reviewed and approved by the investment adviser’s Valuation Committee and by the Trustees based upon procedures approved by the Trustees. Junior Loans are valued in the same manner as Senior Loans.
Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of the average bid and average asked prices that are reported by currency dealers to a third party pricing service at the valuation time. Such third party pricing service valuations are supplied for specific settlement periods and the Portfolio’s forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at an interpolated rate
39
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
between the closest preceding and subsequent settlement period reported by the third party pricing service. Credit default swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. The pricing services employ electronic data processing techniques to determine the present value based on credit spread quotations obtained from broker/dealers and expected default recovery rates determined by the pricing service using proprietary models. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities in the same manner as debt obligations described above.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount. Fees associated with loan amendments are recognized immediately. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
40
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Unfunded Loan Commitments — The Portfolio may enter into certain credit agreements all or a portion of which may be unfunded. The Portfolio is obligated to fund these commitments at the borrower’s discretion. These commitments are disclosed in the accompanying Portfolio of Investments.
H Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
I Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
J Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts — The Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. The Portfolio may enter into forward contracts for hedging purposes as well as non-hedging purposes. The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any gains or losses are recorded as unrealized until such time as the contracts have been closed or offset by another contract with the same broker for the same settlement date and currency. Risks may arise upon entering these contracts from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts and from movements in the value of a foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar.
K Credit Default Swaps — The Portfolio may enter into credit default swap contracts to manage its credit risk, to gain exposure to a credit in which the Portfolio may
otherwise invest, or to enhance return. When the Portfolio is the buyer of a credit default swap contract, the Portfolio is entitled to receive the par (or other agreed-upon) value of a referenced debt obligation (or basket of debt obligations) from the counterparty to the contract if a credit event by a third party, such as a U.S. or foreign corporate issuer or sovereign issuer, on the debt obligation occurs. In return, the Portfolio pays the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no credit event has occurred. If no credit event occurs, the Portfolio would have spent the stream of payments and received no benefits from the contract. When the Portfolio is the seller of a credit default swap contract, it receives the stream of payments, but is obligated to pay to the buyer of the protection an amount up to the notional amount of the swap and in certain instances take delivery of securities of the reference entity upon the occurrence of a credit event, as defined under the terms of that particular swap agreement. Credit events are contract specific but may include bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration and repudiation/moratorium. If the Portfolio is a seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Portfolio could be required to make would be an amount equal to the notional amount of the agreement. This potential amount would be partially offset by any recovery value of the respective referenced obligation, or net amount received from the settlement of a buy protection credit default swap agreement entered into by the Portfolio for the same referenced obligation. As the seller, the Portfolio effectively adds leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, the Portfolio is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. The interest fee paid or received on the swap contract, which is based on a specified interest rate on a fixed notional amount, is accrued daily as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and is recorded as realized gain upon receipt or realized loss upon payment. The Portfolio also records an increase or decrease to unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in an amount equal to the daily valuation. Upfront payments or receipts, if any, are recorded as other assets or other liabilities, respectively, and amortized over the life of the swap contract as realized gains or losses. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to the notional amount of the credit default swaps of which it is the seller. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to any unrealized depreciation of the credit default swaps of which it is the buyer, marked to market on a daily basis. These transactions involve certain risks, including the risk that the seller may be unable to fulfill the transaction.
41
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement and subsequent fee reduction agreement between the Portfolio and BMR, the fee is computed at an annual rate 0.575% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $1 billion, 0.525% from $1 billion up to 2 billion, 0.500% from $2 billion up to $5 billion, 0.480% from $5 billion up to $10 billion and 0.460% of average daily net assets of $10 billion or more, and is payable monthly. The fee reduction cannot be terminated without the consent of the Trustees and shareholders. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $18,492,605 of which $850,008 was allocated from Cash Management and $17,642,597 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.53% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations and including maturities and principal repayments on Senior Loans, aggregated $1,536,345,479 and $1,181,885,322, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 4,726,827,921 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 59,241,865 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (435,291,005 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (376,049,140 | ) | | |
|
|
The net unrealized appreciation on foreign currency at October 31, 2009 on federal income tax basis was $1,175,157.
5 Restricted Securities
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio owned the following securities (representing less than 0.1% of net assets) which were restricted as to public resale and not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (excluding Rule 144A securities). The Portfolio has various registration rights (exercisable under a variety of circumstances) with respect to these securities. The value of these securities is determined based on valuations provided by brokers when available, or if not available, they are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Date of
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Acquisition | | | Shares | | | Cost | | | Value | | | |
|
Common Stocks |
|
Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc. | | | 10/25/07 | | | | 2,484 | | | $ | 0 | (1) | | $ | 34,602 | | | |
|
|
Preferred Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc., Series A | | | 10/25/07 | | | | 1,138 | | | $ | 19,915 | | | $ | 91,040 | | | |
Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc., Series A, Convertible | | | 6/23/03 | | | | 350 | | | | 17,500 | | | | 91 | | | |
|
|
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | | | | | $ | 37,415 | | | $ | 125,733 | | | |
|
|
6 Financial Instruments
The Portfolio may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include forward foreign currency exchange contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Portfolio has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
42
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at October 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
|
Sales |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | Deliver | | In Exchange For | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
11/30/09 | | British Pound Sterling 60,847,811 | | United States Dollar 99,434,451 | | $ | (414,446 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Euro 192,194,065 | | United States Dollar 283,880,243 | | | 1,054,981 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Euro 2,715,000 | | United States Dollar 4,070,844 | | | 75,556 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Euro 2,655,000 | | United States Dollar 3,973,367 | | | 66,373 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Swiss Franc 13,619,589 | | United States Dollar 13,300,380 | | | 22,187 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 804,651 | | | |
|
|
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815-10), effective May 1, 2009. Such standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. The disclosure below includes additional information as a result of implementing FAS 161.
The Portfolio is subject to foreign exchange risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objective. Because the Portfolio holds foreign currency denominated investments, the value of these investments and related receivables and payables may change due to future changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To hedge against this risk, the Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The Portfolio may also enter into such contracts to hedge currency risk of investments it anticipates purchasing.
The forward foreign currency exchange contracts in which the Portfolio invests are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the contract fails to perform its obligations under the contract. At October 31, 2009, the maximum amount of loss the Portfolio would incur due to counterparty risk was $1,219,097, representing the fair value of such derivatives in an asset position.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is foreign exchange risk at October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value |
| | |
Derivative | | Asset Derivatives | | | Liability Derivatives | | | |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | $ | 1,219,097(1 | ) | | $ | (414,446 | )(2) | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Receivable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts and Net unrealized depreciation. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Payable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts and Net unrealized depreciation. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is foreign exchange risk for the six months ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Change in
| | | |
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | Realized Gain
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
| | (Loss) on
| | | (Depreciation) on
| | | |
| | Derivatives
| | | Derivatives
| | | |
| | Recognized in
| | | Recognized in
| | | |
Derivative | | Income | | | Income | | | |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | $ | (33,309,680 | )(1) | | $ | 2,948,048 | (2) | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts transactions. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts. |
The average notional amount of forward foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009, which is indicative of the volume of this derivative type, was approximately $321,857,000.
7 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million ($1 billion prior to March 23, 2009) unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at a prime rate or an amount above either The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or the Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.15% (0.08% prior to March 23, 2009) on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of
43
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
each quarter. Average borrowings and average interest rate for the year ended October 31, 2009 were $7,369,910 and 1.76%, respectively.
8 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by companies whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Portfolio, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign securities markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
9 Concentration of Credit Risk
The Portfolio invests primarily in below investment grade floating-rate loans and floating-rate debt obligations, which are considered speculative because of the credit risk of their issuers. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances are more likely to reduce the capacity of issuers of these securities to make principal and interest payments. Such companies are more likely to default on their payments of interest and principal owed than issuers of investment grade bonds. An economic downturn generally leads to a higher non-payment rate, and a loan or other debt obligation may lose significant value before a default occurs. Lower rated investments also may be subject to greater price volatility than higher rated investments. Moreover, the specific collateral used to secure a loan may decline in value or become illiquid, which would adversely affect the loan’s value.
10 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier
hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Senior Floating-Rate Interests (Less unfunded loan commitments) | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,142,913,761 | | | $ | 6,829,221 | | | $ | 4,149,742,982 | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes | | | — | | | | 17,137,226 | | | | 505,328 | | | | 17,642,554 | | | |
Asset-Backed Securities | | | — | | | | 6,408,531 | | | | — | | | | 6,408,531 | | | |
Common Stocks | | | 3,775 | | | | 2,978,343 | | | | 1,053,368 | | | | 4,035,486 | | | |
Preferred Stocks | | | — | | | | 91 | | | | 91,040 | | | | 91,131 | | | |
Closed-End Investment Companies | | | 44,040 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 44,040 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 165,515,197 | | | | 7,298,860 | | | | — | | | | 172,814,057 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 165,563,012 | | | $ | 4,176,736,812 | | | $ | 8,478,957 | | | $ | 4,350,778,781 | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | | — | | | | 1,219,097 | | | | — | | | | 1,219,097 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 165,563,012 | | | $ | 4,177,955,909 | | | $ | 8,478,957 | | | $ | 4,351,997,878 | | | |
|
|
44
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Liability Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Liability Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | $ | — | | | $ | (414,446 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (414,446 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | (414,446 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (414,446 | ) | | |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investments
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | in Senior
| | | Investments
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Floating-
| | | in Corporate
| | | Investments
| | | Investments
| | | | | | |
| | Rate
| | | Bonds &
| | | in Common
| | | in Preferred
| | | | | | |
| | Interests | | | Notes | | | Stocks | | | Stocks | | | Total | | | |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 | | $ | 6,914,981 | | | $ | 107,680 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 26,140 | | | $ | 7,048,801 | | | |
Realized gains (losses) | | | (5,765,532 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5,765,532 | ) | | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)* | | | 4,804,968 | | | | 60,573 | | | | (100,916 | ) | | | 64,900 | | | | 4,829,525 | | | |
Net purchases (sales) | | | 3,545,627 | | | | 319,149 | | | | 1,154,284 | | | | — | | | | 5,019,060 | | | |
Accrued discount (premium) | | | 23,796 | | | | 17,926 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 41,722 | | | |
Net transfers to (from) Level 3 | | | (2,694,619 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,694,619 | ) | | |
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 | | $ | 6,829,221 | | | $ | 505,328 | | | $ | 1,053,368 | | | $ | 91,040 | | | $ | 8,478,957 | | | |
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments still held as of October 31, 2009* | | $ | (4,188,186 | ) | | $ | 60,573 | | | $ | (60,841 | ) | | $ | 64,900 | | | $ | (4,123,554 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount is included in the related amount on investments in the Statement of Operations. |
11 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 28, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
45
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Floating Rate Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Floating Rate Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities and senior loans owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and selling or agent banks; where replies were not received from brokers and selling or agent banks, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 2009
46
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
47
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Floating Rate Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), the portfolio in which Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund (the “Fund”) invests, with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including the fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio. In particular, the Board evaluated the experience and abilities of such personnel in analyzing factors such as the special considerations relevant to investing in senior floating-rate loans. Specifically, the Board noted the experience of the Adviser’s large group of bank loan investment professionals and other personnel who provide services to the Portfolio, including portfolio managers and analysts. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and
48
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund, the Portfolio and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
49
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust), and Floating Rate Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
50
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 1998 and of the Portfolio since 2000 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Scott H. Page 11/30/59 | | President of the Portfolio | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 11 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Craig P. Russ 10/30/63 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 6 registered investment companies managed by EMV or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
51
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
52
Investment Adviser of Floating Rate Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Administrator of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate FundEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank & Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Annual Report October 31, 2009 |
EATON VANCE FLOATING-RATE & HIGH INCOME |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f442b/f442b7310f2541218bac7a2866c4f711c23a364e" alt="(PHOTO OF SCOTT H. PAGE)"
Scott H. Page, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40f82/40f82aac4dd511b45d70cebf97a208f25c6012c8" alt="(PHOTO OF CRAIG P. RUSS)"
Craig P. Russ
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | During the year ending October 31, 2009, global credit markets experienced unprecedented volatility in the early months of the period but staged a remarkable turnaround beginning in January 2009. In the first two months of the period, there was little doubt that a recession would bring higher default rates; but it was difficult to reconcile bank loan and high-yield bond prices with market fundamentals. By the turn of the New Year, however, the markets began to rebound as credit spreads tightened from record levels and investors returned to the credit markets. |
• | | The loan market, as measured by the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index (the Index) returned 46.90% for the first 10 months of 2009, the highest 10-month performance in the history of the asset class. For the fiscal year, this Index returned 30.44%.1 Performance was driven by a combination of technical factors, which improved the market’s supply and demand picture. On the supply side, limited new loan issuance and a contraction of the existing supply through loan repayments reduced the available universe of purchasable loans. Matched with little selling activity and modest but steady inflows, loan prices improved significantly. The default rate in the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index reached 12.0% as of October 31, 2009—near historical post-recession peaks. |
• | | The high-yield market also had strong performance during 2009. The BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index returned 48.79% for the 12-months ending October 31, 2009.1 High-yield spreads—the additional yield over Treasury bonds of comparable maturity—narrowed significantly, from a record level of over 2,000 (20.00%) basis points in mid-December 2008 to 760 (7.6%) as of October 31, 2009. Lower-quality paper led performance in 2009, with CCC-rated issues performing the best, followed by BB-rated and B-rated bonds. The new-issue market remained strong, with the year-to-date total at almost $110 billion in new issues, which is roughly three times the amount of issuance during the first nine months of 2008. Defaults among high-yield issuers continued to increase, as Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., reported speculative-grade defaults hitting 12.4% at the end of October 2009. This compares closely with historical peaks in the past recessions of 11.01% in January 2002 and 12.07% in 1991. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Management Discussion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66d78/66d783327768237996dc90548f3e4b7d3e5637aa" alt="(PHOTO OF MICHAEL W. WEILHEIMER)"
Michael W. Weilheimer, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f82f3/f82f39856f89ffc6526ea4f4a2d8416356275507" alt="(PHOTO OF THOMAS J. HUGGINS)"
Thomas J. Huggins, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | The Fund’s2 investment objective is to provide a high level of current income. The Fund currently seeks its objective by investing at least 65% of its total assets in Floating Rate Portfolio and not more than 20% of its total assets in High Income Opportunities Portfolio. The Portfolios are separate registered investment companies managed by Eaton Vance or its affiliates. As of October 31, 2009, the Fund was 89.6% invested in Floating Rate Portfolio and 10.4% invested in High Income Opportunities Portfolio. |
Total Return Performance
10/31/08 — 10/31/09
| | | | |
Advisers Class3 | | | 28.05 | % |
Class A3 | | | 28.18 | |
Class B3 | | | 27.14 | |
Class C3 | | | 26.98 | |
Class I3 | | | 28.31 | |
S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index1 | | | 30.44 | |
See page 4 for more performance information. | | | | |
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return reflects changes in value of the loans/high-yield bonds constituting the Index and accrual of interest and does not reflect the commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the loans represented in the Index. |
|
2 | | The Fund currently invests in separate registered investment companies, Floating Rate Portfolio and High Income Opportunities Portfolio (the Portfolios). References to investments are to the Portfolios’ holdings. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 2.25% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Advisers Class and Class I shares are offered to investors at net asset value. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
1
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | Floating Rate Portfolio’s floating-rate loan investments included 421 borrowers as of October 31, 2009, with an average loan size of 0.23% of total investments, and no industry constituting more than 9.1% of total investments. Health care, business equipment and services, and cable and satellite television were among the top industry weightings. The Portfolio’s loans were primarily senior, secured loans to companies with average revenues exceeding $1 billion. |
|
• | | Floating Rate Portfolio’s larger, higher-quality loans helped its performance in the earlier part of 2009 as these loans were the first to benefit from price recovery. However, the past six months witnessed a “junk rally,” with the market’s lowest-quality loans skyrocketing back to life. As a result, the Portfolio’s relative underweight to the lowest-quality loans, including second-lien loans and those rated below CCC, detracted slightly from relative performance in the second half of the period. |
|
• | | Floating Rate Portfolio had a 9% exposure to European loans as of October 31, 2009. The Portfolio’s involvement in the European leveraged loan market represented further opportunity for diversification, and while this market was affected slightly more than the U.S. bank loan market by the credit market turmoil, we believe it offers attractive appreciation opportunity at current price levels. |
|
• | | In terms of industry sectors, Floating Rate Portfolio’s relative overweight to the cable and satellite television, leisure goods, activities and movies, and business equipment and services industries benefited relative performance. Detractors included underweights to the automotive, lodging and casino industries. The Portfolio’s diversification was an important risk mitigator during the fiscal year. |
|
• | | High Income Opportunities Portfolio posted a strong absolute return for the period but came up short of its primary benchmark, the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index (the High Yield Index). The Portfolio underperformed the High Yield Index security selection and an overweighting in the high-yield debt of gaming companies, which struggled, especially during the first half of the fiscal year. Also detracting from relative results were conservative allocations to various financial services industries — including banks and thrifts, insurance and diversified financials — as well as underexposure to automotive and auto parts, all of which put up strong returns during the period. While the Fund’s absolute performance benefited from its investments in these strong performing groups, maintaining underweighed allocations to these industries took a toll in relative terms. |
|
• | | On the upside, High Income Opportunities Portfolio offset some of its index-lagging performance through a sizable overweighting in CCC bonds. In addition, the Portfolio’s performance versus the Index benefited from strong security selection within the telecommunications and cable/satellite television industries. Finally, an overweighting and favorable selection in the resurgent super retail group aided relative returns, as did an underweighting and security selection in the utilities segment, which underperformed the market. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
2
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND STATISTICS
Portfolio Composition
Top 10 Holdings1
By total investments
| | | | |
Community Health Systems, Inc. | | | 1.3 | % |
UPC Broadband Holding B.V. | | | 1.2 | |
HCA, Inc. | | | 1.2 | |
Intelsat Corp. | | | 1.2 | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc. | | | 1.2 | |
Rite Aid Corp. | | | 1.2 | |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. | | | 1.2 | |
Aramark Corp. | | | 1.0 | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC | | | 1.0 | |
Univision Communications, Inc. | | | 1.0 | |
| | |
1 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 11.5% of Floating Rate Portfolio’s total investments as of 10/31/09. |
Top Five Industries2
By total investments
| | | | |
Health Care | | | 9.1 | % |
Business Equipment and Services | | | 7.9 | |
Cable and Satellite Television | | | 7.1 | |
Publishing | | | 6.5 | |
Radio and Television | | | 5.3 | |
| | |
2 | | Industries are shown as a percentage of Floating Rate Portfolio’s total investments as of 10/31/09. |
Credit Quality Ratings for
Total Loan Investments3
By total loan investments
| | | | |
Baa | | | 1.9 | % |
Ba | | | 37.0 | |
B | | | 35.4 | |
Ca | | | 0.8 | |
Caa | | | 5.5 | |
Defaulted | | | 7.5 | |
Non-Rated4 | | | 11.9 | |
| | |
3 | | Credit Quality ratings are those provided by Moody’s Investor Services, Inc., a nationally recognized bond rating service. Reflects Floating Rate Portfolio’s total loan investments as of 10/31/09. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. |
|
4 | | Certain loans in which Floating Rate Portfolio invests are not rated by a rating agency. In management’s opinion, such securities are comparable to securities rated by a rating agency in the categories listed above. |
3
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class B of the Fund with that of the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index, an unmanaged loan market index. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class B and the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
Performance1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Advisers | | | | | | | | |
| | Class | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EAFHX | | EVFHX | | EBFHX | | ECFHX | | EIFHX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One year | | | 28.05 | % | | | 28.18 | % | | | 27.14 | % | | | 26.98 | % | | | 28.31 | % |
Five years | | | 2.64 | | | | 2.67 | | | | 1.91 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 2.91 | |
Life of Fund | | | 3.52 | | | | 3.43 | | | | 2.80 | | | | 2.78 | | | | 3.77 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One year | | | 28.05 | % | | | 25.24 | % | | | 22.14 | % | | | 25.98 | % | | | 28.31 | % |
Five years | | | 2.64 | | | | 2.20 | | | | 1.59 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 2.91 | |
Life of Fund | | | 3.52 | | | | 3.07 | | | | 2.80 | | | | 2.78 | | | | 3.77 | |
| | |
+ | | Inception Dates — Advisers Class: 9/7/00; Class A: 5/7/03; Class B: 9/5/00; Class C: 9/5/00; Class I: 9/15/00 |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns at net asset value do not include the 2.25% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B or Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Advisers Class and Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 2.25% sales charge. SEC returns for Class B reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class A, Advisers Class and Class I shares are subject to a 1% redemption fee if redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of the settlement of the purchase. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | Advisers | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.22 | % | | | 1.22 | % | | | 1.97 | % | | | 1.97 | % | | | 0.94 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bec4/0bec480327d2296167019a6f3c79007c082f15f8" alt="(LINE GRAPH)"
| | |
* | | Source: Morningstar Direct. Class B of the Fund commenced operations on 9/5/00. Index data is available as of month end only. |
|
| | A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class A on 5/7/03, Class C on 9/5/00, Class I on 9/15/00 and Advisers Class on 9/7/00 would have been valued at $12,447 ($12,167 at the maximum offering price), $12,859, $14,020 and $13,727, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
4
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,222.70 | | | | $6.50 | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,223.30 | | | | $6.50 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,218.30 | | | | $10.57 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,216.80 | | | | $10.67 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,223.80 | | | | $5.27 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.40 | | | | $5.90 | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.40 | | | | $5.90 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.70 | | | | $9.60 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.60 | | | | $9.70 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.50 | | | | $4.79 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.16% for Advisers Class shares, 1.16% for Class A shares, 1.89% for Class B shares, 1.91% for Class C shares and 0.94% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolios. | |
5
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Floating Rate Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $627,081,369) | | $ | 541,030,949 | | | |
Investment in High Income Opportunities Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $73,012,471) | | | 62,484,981 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 2,812,083 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 606,328,013 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 1,694,245 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 649,718 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 248,774 | | | |
Administration fee | | | 77,287 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 216,325 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 2,886,391 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 603,441,622 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 804,272,148 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolios | | | (108,806,825 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 4,554,209 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation from Portfolios | | | (96,577,910 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 603,441,622 | | | |
|
|
|
Advisers Class Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 134,366,922 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 16,276,630 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.26 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 180,646,328 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 20,583,369 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.78 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 97.75 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 8.98 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 28,490,433 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 3,454,581 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.25 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 183,193,269 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 22,219,736 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.24 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 76,744,670 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 9,295,223 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.26 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $100,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest allocated from Portfolios | | $ | 38,865,776 | | | |
Dividends allocated from Portfolios | | | 34,148 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolios | | | (3,640,859 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolios | | $ | 35,259,065 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Administration fee | | $ | 865,694 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | 400,665 | | | |
Class A | | | 372,587 | | | |
Class B | | | 320,406 | | | |
Class C | | | 1,624,901 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 44,338 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 664,315 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 21,230 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 155,812 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 87,883 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 22,653 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 4,580,984 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 30,678,081 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolios |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (38,994,839 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (2,140,340 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (4,273,570 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (45,408,749 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 167,100,590 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | 1,002,631 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (1,254,571 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 166,848,650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 121,439,901 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 152,117,982 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 30,678,081 | | | $ | 55,537,260 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, swap contracts and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts transactions | | | (45,408,749 | ) | | | (18,021,629 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, swap contracts, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 166,848,650 | | | | (238,438,222 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 152,117,982 | | | $ | (200,922,591 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | $ | (8,867,720 | ) | | $ | (16,232,328 | ) | | |
Class A | | | (8,129,409 | ) | | | (12,836,517 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (1,604,480 | ) | | | (3,656,107 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (7,803,085 | ) | | | (13,672,901 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (4,124,494 | ) | | | (1,641,115 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | — | | | | (2,316,847 | ) | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | (1,832,162 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (521,838 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (1,951,539 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (234,237 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (30,529,188 | ) | | $ | (54,895,591 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | $ | 92,788,983 | | | $ | 213,973,459 | | | |
Class A | | | 47,522,481 | | | | 48,229,120 | | | |
Class B | | | 1,164,406 | | | | 1,344,757 | | | |
Class C | | | 17,116,952 | | | | 21,330,674 | | | |
Class I | | | 81,875,069 | | | | 23,729,442 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | 5,533,021 | | | | 14,535,766 | | | |
Class A | | | 5,540,631 | | | | 10,824,961 | | | |
Class B | | | 1,040,314 | | | | 2,659,315 | | | |
Class C | | | 5,288,416 | | | | 10,491,392 | | | |
Class I | | | 1,418,313 | | | | 1,411,512 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | (151,561,986 | ) | | | (465,669,578 | ) | | |
Class A | | | (62,667,100 | ) | | | (215,220,489 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (10,363,388 | ) | | | (30,030,221 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (47,672,012 | ) | | | (156,998,783 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (49,142,489 | ) | | | (33,865,338 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 14,310,799 | | | | 5,920,180 | | | |
Class B | | | (14,310,799 | ) | | | (5,920,180 | ) | | |
Redemption fees | | | 317,937 | | | | 791,757 | | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (61,800,452 | ) | | $ | (552,462,254 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 59,788,342 | | | $ | (808,280,436 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 543,653,280 | | | $ | 1,351,933,716 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 603,441,622 | | | $ | 543,653,280 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 4,554,209 | | | $ | 59,944 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Advisers Class |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 6.810 | | | $ | 9.450 | | | $ | 9.690 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 9.710 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.390 | | | $ | 0.551 | | | $ | 0.639 | | | $ | 0.597 | | | $ | 0.451 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.444 | | | | (2.662 | ) | | | (0.233 | ) | | | 0.014 | | | | (0.031 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.834 | | | $ | (2.111 | ) | | $ | 0.406 | | | $ | 0.611 | | | $ | 0.420 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.388 | ) | | $ | (0.469 | ) | | $ | (0.647 | ) | | $ | (0.601 | ) | | $ | (0.451 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.068 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.388 | ) | | $ | (0.537 | ) | | $ | (0.647 | ) | | $ | (0.601 | ) | | $ | (0.451 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.004 | | | $ | 0.008 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.001 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.260 | | | $ | 6.810 | | | $ | 9.450 | | | $ | 9.690 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 28.05 | % | | | (23.29 | )% | | | 4.29 | % | | | 6.49 | % | | | 4.42 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 134,367 | | | $ | 154,101 | | | $ | 469,777 | | | $ | 841,865 | | | $ | 710,286 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.20 | % | | | 1.22 | % | | | 1.08 | % | | | 1.05 | % | | | 1.05 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.56 | % | | | 6.28 | % | | | 6.63 | % | | | 6.16 | % | | | 4.65 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of High Income Opportunities Portfolio | | | 72 | % | | | 48 | % | | | 81 | % | | | 62 | % | | | 62 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount is less than $0.0005. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 7.240 | | | $ | 10.050 | | | $ | 10.300 | | | $ | 10.290 | | | $ | 10.320 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.413 | | | $ | 0.591 | | | $ | 0.680 | | | $ | 0.631 | | | $ | 0.475 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.536 | | | | (2.838 | ) | | | (0.243 | ) | | | 0.018 | | | | (0.027 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.949 | | | $ | (2.247 | ) | | $ | 0.437 | | | $ | 0.649 | | | $ | 0.448 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.498 | ) | | $ | (0.688 | ) | | $ | (0.639 | ) | | $ | (0.479 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.073 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.571 | ) | | $ | (0.688 | ) | | $ | (0.639 | ) | | $ | (0.479 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.004 | | | $ | 0.008 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.001 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.780 | | | $ | 7.240 | | | $ | 10.050 | | | $ | 10.300 | | | $ | 10.290 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 28.18 | % | | | (23.31 | )% | | | 4.35 | % | | | 6.49 | % | | | 4.43 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 180,646 | | | $ | 144,591 | | | $ | 361,138 | | | $ | 423,214 | | | $ | 474,435 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.20 | % | | | 1.22 | % | | | 1.09 | % | | | 1.05 | % | | | 1.05 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.47 | % | | | 6.35 | % | | | 6.63 | % | | | 6.13 | % | | | 4.60 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of High Income Opportunities Portfolio | | | 72 | % | | | 48 | % | | | 81 | % | | | 62 | % | | | 62 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount is less than $0.0005. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 6.810 | | | $ | 9.450 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 9.700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.348 | | | $ | 0.487 | | | $ | 0.567 | | | $ | 0.520 | | | $ | 0.373 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.425 | | | | (2.661 | ) | | | (0.223 | ) | | | 0.008 | | | | (0.017 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.773 | | | $ | (2.174 | ) | | $ | 0.344 | | | $ | 0.528 | | | $ | 0.356 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.337 | ) | | $ | (0.414 | ) | | $ | (0.575 | ) | | $ | (0.528 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.060 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.337 | ) | | $ | (0.474 | ) | | $ | (0.575 | ) | | $ | (0.528 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.004 | | | $ | 0.008 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.001 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.250 | | | $ | 6.810 | | | $ | 9.450 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 27.14 | % | | | (23.84 | )% | | | 3.63 | % | | | 5.60 | % | | | 3.74 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 28,490 | | | $ | 46,480 | | | $ | 99,812 | | | $ | 134,213 | | | $ | 163,795 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.95 | % | | | 1.97 | % | | | 1.84 | % | | | 1.80 | % | | | 1.80 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.03 | % | | | 5.58 | % | | | 5.88 | % | | | 5.37 | % | | | 3.84 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of High Income Opportunities Portfolio | | | 72 | % | | | 48 | % | | | 81 | % | | | 62 | % | | | 62 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount is less than $0.0005. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 6.810 | | | $ | 9.450 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 9.700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.339 | | | $ | 0.488 | | | $ | 0.566 | | | $ | 0.521 | | | $ | 0.374 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.424 | | | | (2.663 | ) | | | (0.222 | ) | | | 0.007 | | | | (0.018 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.763 | | | $ | (2.175 | ) | | $ | 0.344 | | | $ | 0.528 | | | $ | 0.356 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.337 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.575 | ) | | $ | (0.528 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.060 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.337 | ) | | $ | (0.473 | ) | | $ | (0.575 | ) | | $ | (0.528 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.004 | | | $ | 0.008 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.001 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.240 | | | $ | 6.810 | | | $ | 9.450 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 26.98 | % | | | (23.84 | )% | | | 3.63 | % | | | 5.59 | % | | | 3.74 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 183,193 | | | $ | 177,628 | | | $ | 383,163 | | | $ | 445,987 | | | $ | 525,843 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.95 | % | | | 1.97 | % | | | 1.84 | % | | | 1.80 | % | | | 1.80 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.82 | % | | | 5.59 | % | | | 5.88 | % | | | 5.38 | % | | | 3.85 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of High Income Opportunities Portfolio | | | 72 | % | | | 48 | % | | | 81 | % | | | 62 | % | | | 62 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount is less than $0.0005. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 6.820 | | | $ | 9.460 | | | $ | 9.690 | | | $ | 9.690 | | | $ | 9.710 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.399 | | | $ | 0.563 | | | $ | 0.664 | | | $ | 0.623 | | | $ | 0.474 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.442 | | | | (2.652 | ) | | | (0.225 | ) | | | 0.003 | | | | (0.020 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.841 | | | $ | (2.089 | ) | | $ | 0.439 | | | $ | 0.626 | | | $ | 0.454 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.405 | ) | | $ | (0.490 | ) | | $ | (0.067 | ) | | $ | (0.626 | ) | | $ | (0.475 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.069 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.405 | ) | | $ | (0.559 | ) | | $ | (0.067 | ) | | $ | (0.626 | ) | | $ | (0.475 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.004 | | | $ | 0.008 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.001 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.260 | | | $ | 6.820 | | | $ | 9.460 | | | $ | 9.690 | | | $ | 9.690 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 28.31 | % | | | (23.06 | )% | | | 4.65 | % | | | 6.65 | % | | | 4.78 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 76,745 | | | $ | 20,854 | | | $ | 38,044 | | | $ | 52,730 | | | $ | 37,200 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 0.96 | % | | | 0.94 | % | | | 0.84 | % | | | 0.80 | % | | | 0.80 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.69 | % | | | 6.47 | % | | | 6.88 | % | | | 6.42 | % | | | 4.88 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of High Income Opportunities Portfolio | | | 72 | % | | | 48 | % | | | 81 | % | | | 62 | % | | | 62 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount is less than $0.0005. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements12
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers five classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). The Advisers Class and Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund’s investment objective is to provide a high level of current income. The Fund currently pursues its objective by investing all of its investable assets in interests in the following two portfolios managed by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) or its affiliates: Floating Rate Portfolio and High Income Opportunities Portfolio (the Portfolios), which are New York trusts. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolios reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Floating Rate Portfolio and the High Income Opportunities Portfolio (12.6% and 8.8%, respectively, at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolios. The financial statements of the Floating Rate Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements. A copy of the High Income Opportunities Portfolio’s financial statements is available on the EDGAR Database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website (www.sec.gov), at the Commission’s public reference room in Washington, DC or upon request from the Fund’s principal underwriter, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), by calling 1-800-262-1122.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Floating Rate Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report. Such policies are consistent with those of High Income Opportunities Portfolio.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolios, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $106,557,918 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2010 ($16,168,986), October 31, 2011 ($2,993,864), October 31, 2012 ($2,290,023), October 31, 2013 ($2,252,412), October 31, 2015 ($3,277,415), October 31, 2016 ($60,560,805) and October 31, 2017 ($19,014,413).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
13
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Redemption Fees — Upon the redemption or exchange of shares by Advisers Class, Class A and Class I shareholders within 90 days of the settlement of purchase, a fee of 1% of the current net asset value of these shares will be assessed and retained by the Fund for the benefit of the remaining shareholders. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in capital.
I Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund declares dividends daily to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are generally paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any) are made at least annually. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 30,529,188 | | | $ | 48,038,968 | | | |
Tax return of capital | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,856,623 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $30,029,546, accumulated undistributed net investment income was increased by $4,345,372 and paid-in capital was decreased by $34,374,918 due to expired capital loss carryforwards and differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for swap contracts, mixed straddles, foreign currency gain (loss), premium amortization, and defaulted bonds. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 5,458,213 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (106,557,918 | ) | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (99,081,103 | ) | | |
Other temporary differences | | $ | (649,718 | ) | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, partnership allocations, defaulted bond interest, investments in partnerships, swap contracts, premium amortization and the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
The administration fee is earned by EVM as compensation for administrative services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $865,694. The Portfolios have engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolios’ Notes to Financial Statements.
14
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $35,646 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that EVD, an affiliate of EVM, received $4,093 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Advisers Class, Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolios who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolios are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect distribution plans for the Advisers Class shares (Advisers Plan) and Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Advisers Plan and the Class A Plan provide that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Advisers Class and Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $400,665 for Advisers Class shares and $372,587 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $240,305 and $1,218,676 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $6,896,000 and $62,486,000, respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $80,101 and $406,225 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $38,000, $77,000 and $13,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolios were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | Contributions | | | Withdrawals | | | |
|
Floating Rate Portfolio | | $ | 79,511,639 | | | $ | 169,165,787 | | | |
High Income Opportunities Portfolio | | | 9,691,456 | | | | 20,772,305 | | | |
15
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Advisers Class | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 14,220,356 | | | | 24,724,387 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 793,992 | | | | 1,670,279 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (21,356,638 | ) | | | (53,470,270 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (6,342,290 | ) | | | (27,075,604 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 6,378,165 | | | | 5,204,117 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 742,148 | | | | 1,177,545 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (8,511,074 | ) | | | (23,010,207 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 2,011,102 | | | | 660,099 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 620,341 | | | | (15,968,446 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 162,901 | | | | 153,715 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 152,689 | | | | 308,743 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (1,551,755 | ) | | | (3,497,541 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (2,137,629 | ) | | | (701,040 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (3,373,794 | ) | | | (3,736,123 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 2,451,173 | | | | 2,434,136 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 760,690 | | | | 1,217,278 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (7,093,221 | ) | | | (18,115,003 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (3,881,358 | ) | | | (14,463,589 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class I | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 12,833,266 | | | | 2,760,229 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 203,543 | | | | 165,871 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (6,801,428 | ) | | | (3,889,273 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 6,235,381 | | | | (963,173 | ) | | |
|
|
For the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31 2008, the Fund received $317,937 and $791,757, respectively, in redemption fees.
8 Fair Value Measurements
The Fund adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. At October 31, 2009, the Fund’s investments in the Portfolios were valued based on Level 1 inputs.
9 Review of Subsequent Event
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 28, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
16
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 2009
17
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund.
Qualified Divided Income. The Fund designates $34,148, or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
18
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Floating-Rate Interests — 98.2%(1) |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace and Defense — 2.1% |
|
AWAS Capital, Inc. |
| 9,452 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing March 22, 2013 | | $ | 8,743,162 | | | |
CACI International, Inc. |
| 4,220 | | | Term Loan, 1.78%, Maturing May 3, 2011 | | | 4,156,673 | | | |
DAE Aviation Holdings, Inc. |
| 2,852 | | | Term Loan, 4.01%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 2,681,186 | | | |
| 2,916 | | | Term Loan, 4.04%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 2,741,243 | | | |
Evergreen International Aviation |
| 10,729 | | | Term Loan, 12.00%, Maturing October 31, 2011 | | | 8,529,949 | | | |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition |
| 18,956 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing March 26, 2014 | | | 15,070,326 | | | |
| 1,238 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing March 26, 2014 | | | 983,927 | | | |
Hexcel Corp. |
| 5,625 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing May 21, 2014 | | | 5,667,187 | | | |
IAP Worldwide Services, Inc. |
| 3,326 | | | Term Loan, 9.25%, Maturing December 30, 2012(2) | | | 2,796,828 | | | |
PGS Solutions, Inc. |
| 1,920 | | | Term Loan, 2.65%, Maturing February 14, 2013 | | | 1,823,731 | | | |
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. |
| 3,748 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing December 31, 2011 | | | 3,631,301 | | | |
TransDigm, Inc. |
| 11,650 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing June 23, 2013 | | | 11,202,721 | | | |
Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc. |
| 7,407 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.50%, Maturing December 22, 2009(3) | | | 7,185,185 | | | |
| 2,778 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 17, 2011 | | | 2,777,778 | | | |
| 3,585 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 17, 2011 | | | 3,593,556 | | | |
| 860 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 22, 2011 | | | 854,945 | | | |
Wesco Aircraft Hardware Corp. |
| 7,132 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing September 29, 2013 | | | 6,766,788 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 89,206,486 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Air Transport — 0.3% |
|
Delta Air Lines, Inc. |
| 11,428 | | | Term Loan, 2.20%, Maturing April 30, 2012 | | $ | 9,756,655 | | | |
| 5,417 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.53%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 4,566,427 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,323,082 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Automotive — 3.9% |
|
Accuride Corp. |
| 11,097 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing January 31, 2012 | | $ | 11,044,990 | | | |
| 3,108 | | | Term Loan, Maturing September 30, 2013(4) | | | 3,177,338 | | | |
Adesa, Inc. |
| 21,183 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing October 18, 2013 | | | 20,335,780 | | | |
Allison Transmission, Inc. |
| 6,667 | | | Term Loan, 3.01%, Maturing September 30, 2014 | | | 5,999,170 | | | |
Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc. |
| 915 | | | Revolving Loan, 6.75%, Maturing December 23, 2011 | | | 839,149 | | | |
| 5,581 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing December 23, 2010 | | | 5,120,791 | | | |
| 286 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing December 23, 2011 | | | 262,245 | | | |
Dayco Products, LLC |
| 1,489 | | | DIP Loan, 8.50%, Maturing May 4, 2010 | | | 1,508,300 | | | |
| 1,534 | | | DIP Loan, 8.50%, Maturing May 4, 2010 | | | 1,538,936 | | | |
| 8,180 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing June 21, 2011(5) | | | 3,749,028 | | | |
Federal-Mogul Corp. |
| 19,197 | | | Term Loan, 2.19%, Maturing December 27, 2014 | | | 14,794,017 | | | |
| 10,522 | | | Term Loan, 2.19%, Maturing December 27, 2015 | | | 8,108,173 | | | |
Financiere Truck (Investissement) |
EUR | 1,313 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing February 15, 2012 | | | 1,390,710 | | | |
Ford Motor Co. |
| 10,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 2.50%, Maturing December 15, 2013(3) | | | 9,095,000 | | | |
| 6,946 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing December 15, 2013 | | | 6,207,604 | | | |
Fraikin, Ltd. |
GBP | 1,612 | | | Term Loan, 0.93%, Maturing February 15, 2012(3) | | | 1,904,918 | | | |
GBP | 718 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing February 15, 2012(3) | | | 848,210 | | | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. |
| 35,256 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 2.34%, Maturing April 30, 2010 | | | 32,321,938 | | | |
HLI Operating Co., Inc. |
| 2,496 | | | DIP Loan, 26.00%, Maturing November 30, 2009(2) | | | 2,521,322 | | | |
See notes to financial statements19
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Automotive (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
EUR | 425 | | | Term Loan, 11.00%, Maturing May 30, 2014 | | $ | 46,959 | | | |
EUR | 7,227 | | | Term Loan, 11.50%, Maturing May 30, 2014 | | | 1,648,534 | | | |
Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. |
| 6,841 | | | Term Loan, 3.78%, Maturing January 12, 2012 | | | 4,190,286 | | | |
Locafroid Services S.A.S. |
EUR | 309 | | | Term Loan, 3.47%, Maturing February 15, 2012 | | | 327,361 | | | |
Tenneco Automotive, Inc. |
| 5,050 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing March 17, 2014 | | | 4,772,250 | | | |
TriMas Corp. |
| 894 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing August 2, 2011 | | | 823,367 | | | |
| 7,960 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 7,333,208 | | | |
TRW Automotive, Inc. |
| 10,178 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing February 2, 2014 | | | 10,196,885 | | | |
United Components, Inc. |
| 7,456 | | | Term Loan, 2.72%, Maturing June 30, 2010 | | | 6,915,496 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 167,021,965 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverage and Tobacco — 0.3% |
|
Culligan International Co. |
| 12,320 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 24, 2014 | | $ | 9,609,850 | | | |
Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc. |
| 997 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing May 31, 2012 | | | 976,194 | | | |
Van Houtte, Inc. |
| 116 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing July 11, 2014 | | | 110,591 | | | |
| 850 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing July 11, 2014 | | | 810,997 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,507,632 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Brokers, Dealers and Investment Houses — 0.2% |
|
AmeriTrade Holding Corp. |
| 9,446 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing December 31, 2012 | | $ | 9,185,723 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,185,723 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building and Development — 2.7% |
|
401 North Wabash Venture, LLC |
| 3,789 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing May 7, 2009(6) | | $ | 2,841,393 | | | |
AIMCO Properties, L.P. |
| 5,627 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing March 23, 2011 | | | 5,402,250 | | | |
Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc. |
| 4,337 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing September 30, 2013 | | | 4,092,939 | | | |
Brickman Group Holdings, Inc. |
| 5,830 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing January 23, 2014 | | | 5,504,498 | | | |
Building Materials Corp. of America |
| 3,564 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing February 22, 2014 | | | 3,299,591 | | | |
Capital Automotive (REIT) |
| 2,697 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing December 14, 2012 | | | 2,414,231 | | | |
Contech Construction Products |
| 1,767 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing January 13, 2013 | | | 1,590,457 | | | |
Epco/Fantome, LLC |
| 9,460 | | | Term Loan, 2.87%, Maturing November 23, 2010 | | | 7,236,900 | | | |
Forestar USA Real Estate Group, Inc. |
| 9,442 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.39%, Maturing December 1, 2010(3) | | | 7,930,940 | | | |
| 4,018 | | | Term Loan, 5.10%, Maturing December 1, 2010 | | | 3,616,071 | | | |
Hearthstone Housing Partners II, LLC |
| 4,347 | | | Revolving Loan, 1.75%, Maturing December 1, 2009(3) | | | 2,896,184 | | | |
Lafarge Roofing |
| 637 | | | Term Loan, 2.41%, Maturing July 16, 2014 | | | 467,278 | | | |
| 940 | | | Term Loan, 2.66%, Maturing July 16, 2014 | | | 689,269 | | | |
EUR | 1,417 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing July 16, 2014(2) | | | 1,529,749 | | | |
EUR | 1,415 | | | Term Loan, 3.12%, Maturing July 16, 2014 | | | 1,527,472 | | | |
EUR | 1,819 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing April 16, 2015(2) | | | 1,305,019 | | | |
LNR Property Corp. |
| 8,208 | | | Term Loan, 3.75%, Maturing July 3, 2011 | | | 6,525,629 | | | |
Mueller Water Products, Inc. |
| 6,328 | | | Term Loan, 5.78%, Maturing May 24, 2014 | | | 6,195,990 | | | |
NCI Building Systems, Inc. |
| 3,056 | | | Term Loan, 4.03%, Maturing June 18, 2010 | | | 2,845,825 | | | |
November 2005 Land Investors |
| 610 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing May 9, 2011(5) | | | 207,292 | | | |
Panolam Industries Holdings, Inc. |
| 4,680 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing September 30, 2012 | | | 4,223,335 | | | |
Re/Max International, Inc. |
| 8,620 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing December 17, 2012 | | | 8,447,695 | | | |
Realogy Corp. |
| 2,817 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing September 1, 2014 | | | 2,368,506 | | | |
| 10,464 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing September 1, 2014 | | | 8,797,301 | | | |
Sanitec Europe OY |
EUR | 3,470 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing June 25, 2016 | | | 3,540,911 | | | |
South Edge, LLC |
| 8,795 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing October 31, 2009(6) | | | 2,704,353 | | | |
See notes to financial statements20
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Building and Development (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Standard Pacific Corp. |
| 4,680 | | | Term Loan, 2.19%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | $ | 3,907,800 | | | |
WCI Communities, Inc. |
| 3,660 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing September 3, 2014 | | | 3,138,098 | | | |
| 9,911 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing September 3, 2014 | | | 9,786,687 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 115,033,663 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Business Equipment and Services — 8.2% |
|
Activant Solutions, Inc. |
| 8,237 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing May 1, 2013 | | $ | 7,681,448 | | | |
Acxiom Corp. |
| 8,845 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing September 15, 2012 | | | 8,801,236 | | | |
Affiliated Computer Services |
| 10,037 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 20, 2013 | | | 9,931,565 | | | |
| 5,871 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 20, 2013 | | | 5,809,666 | | | |
Affinion Group, Inc. |
| 5,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.53%, Maturing October 17, 2011(3) | | | 4,387,500 | | | |
| 16,134 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing October 17, 2012 | | | 15,516,430 | | | |
Education Management, LLC |
| 11,302 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing June 1, 2013 | | | 10,622,072 | | | |
Info USA, Inc. |
| 815 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing February 14, 2012 | | | 788,846 | | | |
| 1,796 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing February 14, 2012 | | | 1,737,631 | | | |
Information Resources, Inc. |
| 4,422 | | | Term Loan, 2.14%, Maturing May 7, 2014 | | | 4,190,075 | | | |
Intergraph Corp. |
| 3,350 | | | Term Loan, 2.37%, Maturing May 29, 2014 | | | 3,213,449 | | | |
iPayment, Inc. |
| 11,663 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing May 10, 2013 | | | 10,656,911 | | | |
Kronos, Inc. |
| 10,309 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing June 11, 2014 | | | 9,729,543 | | | |
Language Line, Inc. |
| 6,235 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing June 11, 2011 | | | 6,235,467 | | | |
| 12,325 | | | Term Loan, Maturing October 30, 2015(4) | | | 12,332,703 | | | |
Mitchell International, Inc. |
| 1,990 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing March 28, 2014 | | | 1,803,253 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.56%, Maturing March 28, 2015 | | | 1,020,000 | | | |
N.E.W. Holdings I, LLC |
| 9,167 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing May 22, 2014 | | | 8,587,917 | | | |
Protection One, Inc. |
| 10,574 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing March 31, 2012 | | | 10,118,122 | | | |
Quintiles Transnational Corp. |
| 10,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.25%, Maturing March 31, 2012(3) | | | 9,284,000 | | | |
| 13,404 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing March 31, 2013 | | | 12,792,083 | | | |
Sabre, Inc. |
| 30,770 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing September 30, 2014 | | | 26,711,975 | | | |
Safenet, Inc. |
| 3,910 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 12, 2014 | | | 3,668,069 | | | |
Serena Software, Inc. |
| 7,061 | | | Term Loan, 2.32%, Maturing March 10, 2013 | | | 6,539,914 | | | |
Sitel (Client Logic) |
| 6,866 | | | Term Loan, 5.77%, Maturing January 29, 2014 | | | 5,973,293 | | | |
EUR | 941 | | | Term Loan, 5.93%, Maturing January 29, 2014 | | | 1,135,594 | | | |
Solera Holdings, LLC |
| 3,755 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 3,607,286 | | | |
EUR | 2,969 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 4,237,919 | | | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc. |
| 7,420 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing February 11, 2013 | | | 6,986,141 | | | |
| 3,440 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 3,483,253 | | | |
| 42,536 | | | Term Loan, 4.07%, Maturing February 28, 2016 | | | 41,389,460 | | | |
Ticketmaster |
| 8,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.55%, Maturing July 22, 2014 | | | 7,880,000 | | | |
Transaction Network Services, Inc. |
| 3,919 | | | Term Loan, 9.50%, Maturing May 4, 2012 | | | 3,958,163 | | | |
Travelport, LLC |
| 10,753 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 9,803,979 | | | |
| 13,317 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 12,152,139 | | | |
| 4,672 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 4,263,334 | | | |
EUR | 2,106 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 2,773,633 | | | |
| 2,494 | | | Term Loan, 10.50%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 2,535,313 | | | |
Valassis Communications, Inc. |
| 736 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing March 2, 2014 | | | 688,617 | | | |
| 4,361 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing March 2, 2014 | | | 4,081,522 | | | |
VWR International, Inc. |
| 16,633 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 28, 2013 | | | 15,219,481 | | | |
West Corp. |
| 12,166 | | | Term Loan, 2.62%, Maturing October 24, 2013 | | | 11,198,859 | | | |
| 17,672 | | | Term Loan, 4.12%, Maturing July 15, 2016 | | | 16,651,209 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 350,179,070 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Cable and Satellite Television — 7.3% |
|
Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC |
| 9,403 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing June 8, 2013 | | $ | 9,379,923 | | | |
| 350 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing September 1, 2013 | | | 345,175 | | | |
See notes to financial statements21
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cable and Satellite Television (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Bresnan Broadband Holdings, LLC |
| 1,493 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing March 29, 2014 | | $ | 1,437,774 | | | |
| 15,474 | | | Term Loan, 2.42%, Maturing March 29, 2014 | | | 14,906,367 | | | |
Cequel Communications, LLC |
| 38,664 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing November 5, 2013 | | | 37,020,778 | | | |
Charter Communications Operating, Inc. |
| 45,219 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing April 28, 2013 | | | 41,229,789 | | | |
CSC Holdings, Inc. |
| 14,767 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing March 29, 2013 | | | 14,086,273 | | | |
CW Media Holdings, Inc. |
| 4,962 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing February 15, 2015 | | | 4,614,684 | | | |
DirectTV Holdings, LLC |
| 1,975 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing April 13, 2013 | | | 1,978,079 | | | |
Foxco Acquisition Sub., LLC |
| 5,534 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing July 2, 2015 | | | 5,056,699 | | | |
Insight Midwest Holdings, LLC |
| 26,316 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing April 6, 2014 | | | 25,080,334 | | | |
MCC Iowa, LLC |
| 394 | | | Term Loan, 1.73%, Maturing March 31, 2010 | | | 390,246 | | | |
| 7,656 | | | Term Loan, 1.98%, Maturing January 31, 2015 | | | 7,043,305 | | | |
| 7,780 | | | Term Loan, 1.98%, Maturing January 31, 2015 | | | 7,157,600 | | | |
Mediacom Illinois, LLC |
| 1,620 | | | Term Loan, 1.48%, Maturing September 30, 2012 | | | 1,506,600 | | | |
| 14,176 | | | Term Loan, 1.73%, Maturing January 31, 2015 | | | 13,035,662 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing March 31, 2017 | | | 3,015,000 | | | |
NTL Investment Holdings, Ltd. |
GBP | 3,500 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.62%, Maturing March 30, 2013 | | | 5,331,495 | | | |
ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG |
EUR | 1,887 | | | Term Loan, Maturing June 26, 2014(4) | | | 2,320,919 | | | |
EUR | 113 | | | Term Loan, Maturing July 2, 2014(4) | | | 143,514 | | | |
EUR | 2,020 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing March 2, 2015 | | | 1,989,790 | | | |
EUR | 729 | | | Term Loan, 2.73%, Maturing June 26, 2015 | | | 908,338 | | | |
EUR | 15,457 | | | Term Loan, 2.73%, Maturing June 26, 2015 | | | 19,250,130 | | | |
EUR | 2,020 | | | Term Loan, 3.78%, Maturing March 2, 2016 | | | 1,989,790 | | | |
UPC Broadband Holding B.V. |
| 7,083 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 6,642,839 | | | |
| 4,842 | | | Term Loan, 3.75%, Maturing December 31, 2016 | | | 4,660,863 | | | |
EUR | 19,765 | | | Term Loan, 4.19%, Maturing December 31, 2016 | | | 26,760,394 | | | |
EUR | 10,790 | | | Term Loan, 4.44%, Maturing December 31, 2017 | | | 14,675,363 | | | |
Virgin Media Investment Holding |
GBP | 2,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing March 2, 2012(4) | | | 3,203,420 | | | |
| 7,994 | | | Term Loan, 3.78%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 7,963,901 | | | |
GBP | 2,224 | | | Term Loan, 4.40%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 3,544,651 | | | |
GBP | 3,638 | | | Term Loan, 4.40%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 5,797,625 | | | |
GBP | 1,130 | | | Term Loan, 4.43%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 1,801,099 | | | |
YPSO Holding SA |
EUR | 3,159 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing July 28, 2014 | | | 3,599,311 | | | |
EUR | 5,155 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing July 28, 2014 | | | 5,872,561 | | | |
EUR | 8,186 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing July 28, 2014 | | | 9,326,637 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 313,066,928 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics — 5.1% |
|
Arizona Chemical, Inc. |
EUR | 2,814 | | | Term Loan, 2.82%, Maturing February 28, 2013 | | $ | 3,934,013 | | | |
Ashland, Inc. |
| 3,458 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing May 20, 2014 | | | 3,484,031 | | | |
| 1,298 | | | Term Loan, 7.65%, Maturing November 20, 2014 | | | 1,321,094 | | | |
Brenntag Holding GmbH and Co. KG |
| 10,877 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 10,360,709 | | | |
| 3,477 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 3,311,752 | | | |
EUR | 3,434 | | | Term Loan, 2.88%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 4,889,331 | | | |
EUR | 230 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.02%, Maturing June 23, 2015 | | | 320,635 | | | |
EUR | 770 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.02%, Maturing June 23, 2015 | | | 1,073,754 | | | |
British Vita UK, Ltd. |
EUR | 1,196 | | | Term Loan, 5.78%, Maturing June 30, 2014(2) | | | 1,208,583 | | | |
Celanese Holdings, LLC |
| 10,176 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 9,562,083 | | | |
| 13,433 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 12,599,228 | | | |
Cognis GmbH |
EUR | 1,249 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing September 15, 2013 | | | 1,677,343 | | | |
EUR | 4,276 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing September 15, 2013 | | | 5,744,980 | | | |
Columbian Chemicals Acquisition |
| 8,627 | | | Term Loan, 6.31%, Maturing March 16, 2013 | | | 7,365,464 | | | |
Ferro Corp. |
| 13,520 | | | Term Loan, 6.29%, Maturing June 6, 2012 | | | 12,877,833 | | | |
First Chemical Holding |
EUR | 575 | | | Term Loan, 3.32%, Maturing December 18, 2014 | | | 619,890 | | | |
EUR | 575 | | | Term Loan, 3.82%, Maturing December 18, 2015 | | | 619,890 | | | |
Georgia Gulf Corp. |
| 5,068 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing October 3, 2013 | | | 5,070,261 | | | |
See notes to financial statements22
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. |
EUR | 1,105 | | | Term Loan, 2.95%, Maturing May 5, 2012 | | $ | 1,266,405 | | | |
| 9,600 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 6,480,000 | | | |
| 2,936 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 2,334,392 | | | |
| 13,520 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 10,748,060 | | | |
| 2,481 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 1,966,540 | | | |
Huntsman International, LLC |
| 7,500 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.91%, Maturing August 16, 2010(3) | | | 6,890,625 | | | |
| 18,328 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing August 16, 2012 | | | 16,783,144 | | | |
INEOS Group |
EUR | 150 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 14, 2011(4) | | | 188,284 | | | |
EUR | 150 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 14, 2011(4) | | | 188,284 | | | |
EUR | 2,911 | | | Term Loan, 5.52%, Maturing December 14, 2011 | | | 3,648,230 | | | |
EUR | 2,912 | | | Term Loan, 6.02%, Maturing December 14, 2011 | | | 3,649,514 | | | |
| 3,872 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing December 14, 2012 | | | 3,339,481 | | | |
| 9,968 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 14, 2013 | | | 8,552,579 | | | |
| 9,968 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing December 14, 2014 | | | 8,552,579 | | | |
ISP Chemco, Inc. |
| 8,516 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 8,082,544 | | | |
Kranton Polymers, LLC |
| 15,980 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing May 12, 2013 | | | 15,205,219 | | | |
MacDermid, Inc. |
| 3,082 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing April 12, 2014 | | | 2,619,606 | | | |
Millenium Inorganic Chemicals |
| 6,645 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 6,113,116 | | | |
Momentive Performance Material |
| 4,900 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing December 4, 2013 | | | 4,102,001 | | | |
Nalco Co. |
| 3,035 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing May 6, 2016 | | | 3,091,651 | | | |
Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. |
EUR | 653 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing July 30, 2011 | | | 917,657 | | | |
| 19,572 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 19,848,843 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 220,609,628 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Clothing / Textiles — 0.3% |
|
Hanesbrands, Inc. |
| 6,512 | | | Term Loan, 5.03%, Maturing September 5, 2013 | | $ | 6,550,460 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.99%, Maturing March 5, 2014 | | | 4,843,750 | | | |
St. John Knits International, Inc. |
| 3,861 | | | Term Loan, 9.25%, Maturing March 23, 2012 | | | 3,127,584 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,521,794 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Conglomerates — 3.0% |
|
Amsted Industries, Inc. |
| 10,020 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing October 15, 2010 | | $ | 9,193,785 | | | |
| 6,753 | | | Term Loan, 2.40%, Maturing April 5, 2013 | | | 6,195,633 | | | |
Doncasters (Dunde HoldCo 4 Ltd.) |
GBP | 659 | | | Term Loan, 3.02%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 878,856 | | | |
GBP | 659 | | | Term Loan, 3.52%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 878,856 | | | |
| 3,595 | | | Term Loan, 4.24%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 2,921,189 | | | |
| 3,595 | | | Term Loan, 4.74%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 2,921,189 | | | |
GenTek, Inc. |
| 3,285 | | | Term Loan, Maturing February 25, 2011(4) | | | 3,303,689 | | | |
| 1,715 | | | Term Loan, Maturing February 28, 2011(4) | | | 1,724,436 | | | |
| 2,125 | | | Term Loan, Maturing October 29, 2014(4) | | | 2,140,051 | | | |
Jarden Corp. |
| 3,481 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing January 24, 2012 | | | 3,359,406 | | | |
| 8,467 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing January 24, 2012 | | | 8,189,549 | | | |
| 1,542 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing January 24, 2012 | | | 1,513,974 | | | |
Johnson Diversey, Inc. |
| 1,993 | | | Term Loan, 2.48%, Maturing December 16, 2010 | | | 1,984,707 | | | |
| 7,883 | | | Term Loan, 2.48%, Maturing December 16, 2011 | | | 7,850,920 | | | |
Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The) |
| 15,616 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing August 21, 2014 | | | 15,401,162 | | | |
Polymer Group, Inc. |
| 1,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.74%, Maturing November 22, 2010(3) | | | 850,000 | | | |
| 1,830 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 22, 2012 | | | 1,820,483 | | | |
| 14,060 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing November 22, 2014 | | | 14,095,227 | | | |
RBS Global, Inc. |
| 5,551 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 19, 2013 | | | 5,323,911 | | | |
| 19,195 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing July 19, 2013 | | | 18,490,726 | | | |
RGIS Holdings, LLC |
| 729 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 649,616 | | | |
| 14,578 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 12,992,330 | | | |
US Investigations Services, Inc. |
| 2,940 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing February 21, 2015 | | | 2,739,951 | | | |
Vertrue, Inc. |
| 4,449 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing August 16, 2014 | | | 3,681,486 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 129,101,132 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements23
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Containers and Glass Products — 3.1% |
|
Berry Plastics Corp. |
| 20,393 | | | Term Loan, 2.30%, Maturing April 3, 2015 | | $ | 17,571,642 | | | |
Celanese AG |
EUR | 975 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing April 6, 2011 | | | 1,352,355 | | | |
Consolidated Container Co. |
| 5,821 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing March 28, 2014 | | | 5,417,917 | | | |
Crown Americas, Inc. |
| 1,407 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 1,379,542 | | | |
| 4,703 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 4,612,387 | | | |
EUR | 4,365 | | | Term Loan, 2.18%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 6,206,954 | | | |
Graham Packaging Holdings Co. |
| 4,804 | | | Term Loan, 2.55%, Maturing October 7, 2011 | | | 4,699,176 | | | |
| 19,095 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing April 5, 2014 | | | 19,143,031 | | | |
Graphic Packaging International, Inc. |
| 27,563 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing May 16, 2014 | | | 26,273,710 | | | |
| 3,448 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing May 16, 2014 | | | 3,318,219 | | | |
JSG Acquisitions |
EUR | 1,689 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 2,395,484 | | | |
EUR | 1,692 | | | Term Loan, 4.11%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 2,399,068 | | | |
OI European Group B.V. |
EUR | 12,065 | | | Term Loan, 1.93%, Maturing June 14, 2013 | | | 17,014,945 | | | |
Owens-Brockway Glass Container |
| 4,097 | | | Term Loan, 1.74%, Maturing June 14, 2013 | | | 4,002,688 | | | |
Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. |
| 657 | | | DIP Loan, 10.00%, Maturing August 6, 2010 | | | 660,631 | | | |
| 7,935 | | | Revolving Loan, 2.84%, Maturing July 28, 2010 | | | 7,776,471 | | | |
| 2,632 | | | Revolving Loan, 3.06%, Maturing July 28, 2010 | | | 2,579,219 | | | |
| 1,033 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 1,003,874 | | | |
| 1,813 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 1,765,742 | | | |
| 3,416 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 3,320,309 | | | |
| 1,593 | | | Term Loan, 4.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 1,551,583 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 134,444,947 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Cosmetics / Toiletries — 0.2% |
|
American Safety Razor Co. |
| 3,382 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing July 31, 2013 | | $ | 3,221,352 | | | |
Bausch & Lomb, Inc. |
| 382 | | | Term Loan, 3.52%, Maturing April 30, 2015 | | | 364,889 | | | |
| 1,573 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing April 30, 2015 | | | 1,502,579 | | | |
Prestige Brands, Inc. |
| 5,100 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing April 7, 2011 | | | 5,010,954 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,099,774 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Drugs — 0.6% |
|
Graceway Pharmaceuticals, LLC |
| 15,351 | | | Term Loan, 2.99%, Maturing May 3, 2012 | | $ | 10,822,562 | | | |
Pharmaceutical Holdings Corp. |
| 2,205 | | | Term Loan, 3.50%, Maturing January 30, 2012 | | | 2,089,180 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp. |
| 4,562 | | | Term Loan, Maturing October 30, 2014(4) | | | 4,576,193 | | | |
| 1,597 | | | Term Loan, Maturing April 30, 2015(4) | | | 1,601,667 | | | |
| 2,281 | | | Term Loan, Maturing April 30, 2015(4) | | | 2,288,096 | | | |
| 5,018 | | | Term Loan, Maturing April 30, 2015(4) | | | 4,967,563 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 26,345,261 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.6% |
|
Big Dumpster Merger Sub, Inc. |
| 668 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing February 5, 2013 | | $ | 435,644 | | | |
Blue Waste B.V. (AVR Acquisition) |
EUR | 2,000 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing April 1, 2015 | | | 2,724,026 | | | |
Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc. |
| 417 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 13.50%, Maturing December 12, 2010 | | | 373,050 | | | |
Kemble Water Structure, Ltd. |
GBP | 13,150 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 4.49%, Maturing October 13, 2013 | | | 16,610,763 | | | |
Sensus Metering Systems, Inc. |
| 7,391 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing June 3, 2013 | | | 7,418,416 | | | |
Wastequip, Inc. |
| 281 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing February 5, 2013 | | | 183,429 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 27,745,328 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronics / Electrical — 3.0% |
|
Aspect Software, Inc. |
| 3,502 | | | Term Loan, 3.31%, Maturing July 11, 2011 | | $ | 3,212,819 | | | |
Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. |
| 9,169 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing June 26, 2013 | | | 8,635,707 | | | |
FCI International S.A.S. |
| 331 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 301,842 | | | |
| 552 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 503,458 | | | |
| 552 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 503,458 | | | |
| 573 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 522,952 | | | |
| 992 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 905,384 | | | |
See notes to financial statements24
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Electronics / Electrical (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. |
| 29,815 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing December 1, 2013 | | $ | 24,307,655 | | | |
Infor Enterprise Solutions Holdings |
EUR | 2,917 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing July 28, 2012 | | | 3,837,353 | | | |
| 7,173 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing July 28, 2012 | | | 6,330,083 | | | |
| 19,323 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing July 28, 2012 | | | 17,052,855 | | | |
Network Solutions, LLC |
| 9,452 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing March 7, 2014 | | | 8,507,168 | | | |
Open Solutions, Inc. |
| 10,132 | | | Term Loan, 2.41%, Maturing January 23, 2014 | | | 8,224,110 | | | |
Sensata Technologies Finance Co. |
| 18,483 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing April 27, 2013 | | | 15,912,610 | | | |
Spectrum Brands, Inc. |
| 804 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing March 30, 2013 | | | 788,014 | | | |
| 15,635 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing March 30, 2013 | | | 15,330,400 | | | |
SS&C Technologies, Inc. |
| 3,028 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing November 23, 2012 | | | 2,906,436 | | | |
Vertafore, Inc. |
| 11,266 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 11,097,061 | | | |
| 1,975 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 1,928,094 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 130,807,459 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Equipment Leasing — 0.0% |
|
Hertz Corp. |
| 8 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing December 21, 2012 | | $ | 7,410 | | | |
| 835 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing December 21, 2012 | | | 781,243 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 788,653 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Farming / Agriculture — 0.3% |
|
BF Bolthouse HoldCo, LLC |
| 3,717 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing December 16, 2012 | | $ | 3,635,552 | | | |
Central Garden & Pet Co. |
| 9,843 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 9,367,667 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,003,219 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Financial Intermediaries — 1.6% |
|
Asset Acceptence Capital Corp. |
| 1,440 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 5, 2013 | | $ | 1,396,379 | | | |
Citco III, Ltd. |
| 13,812 | | | Term Loan, 2.85%, Maturing June 30, 2014 | | | 12,085,550 | | | |
E.A. Viner International Co. |
| 395 | | | Term Loan, 4.79%, Maturing July 31, 2013 | | | 373,124 | | | |
Grosvenor Capital Management |
| 5,729 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing December 5, 2013 | | | 5,213,526 | | | |
Jupiter Asset Management Group |
GBP | 3,644 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 30, 2015 | | | 5,651,191 | | | |
Lender Processing Services, Inc. |
| 5,040 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing July 2, 2014 | | | 5,011,814 | | | |
LPL Holdings, Inc. |
| 26,606 | | | Term Loan, 2.01%, Maturing December 18, 2014 | | | 25,142,351 | | | |
Nuveen Investments, Inc. |
| 3,977 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing November 2, 2014 | | | 3,444,079 | | | |
Oxford Acquisition III, Ltd. |
| 11,051 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing May 24, 2014 | | | 9,190,512 | | | |
RJO Holdings Corp. (RJ O’Brien) |
| 4,007 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 2,694,619 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 70,203,145 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 2.9% |
|
Acosta, Inc. |
| 16,913 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 28, 2013 | | $ | 16,119,855 | | | |
Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc. |
| 16,440 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing March 29, 2013 | | | 15,659,544 | | | |
American Seafoods Group, LLC |
| 1,930 | | | Term Loan, 4.03%, Maturing September 30, 2012 | | | 1,881,623 | | | |
BL Marketing, Ltd. |
GBP | 3,500 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing December 31, 2013 | | | 5,528,958 | | | |
GBP | 2,500 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.01%, Maturing June 30, 2015 | | | 3,692,811 | | | |
Dean Foods Co. |
| 26,531 | | | Term Loan, 1.66%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 24,856,063 | | | |
Dole Food Company, Inc. |
| 1,691 | | | Term Loan, 7.15%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 1,710,605 | | | |
| 2,324 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 2,351,344 | | | |
| 8,204 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 8,301,165 | | | |
MafCo Worldwide Corp. |
| 733 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing December 8, 2011 | | | 688,884 | | | |
Pinnacle Foods Finance, LLC |
| 4,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.90%, Maturing April 2, 2013(3) | | | 2,700,000 | | | |
| 30,959 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 29,063,083 | | | |
See notes to financial statements25
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Food Products (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Reddy Ice Group, Inc. |
| 12,335 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing August 9, 2012 | | $ | 11,039,825 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 123,593,760 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Service — 2.5% |
|
AFC Enterprises, Inc. |
| 1,611 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing May 11, 2011 | | $ | 1,623,305 | | | |
Aramark Corp. |
| 3,075 | | | Term Loan, 2.14%, Maturing January 26, 2014 | | | 2,827,627 | | | |
| 45,618 | | | Term Loan, 2.16%, Maturing January 26, 2014 | | | 41,949,126 | | | |
| 973 | | | Term Loan, 2.16%, Maturing January 26, 2014 | | | 887,893 | | | |
| 238 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing October 22, 2014 | | | 228,884 | | | |
Buffets, Inc. |
| 5,223 | | | Term Loan, 18.00%, Maturing April 30, 2012 | | | 5,334,465 | | | |
| 1,059 | | | Term Loan, 7.53%, Maturing November 1, 2013(2) | | | 931,568 | | | |
| 4,618 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 17.78%, Maturing November 1, 2013(2) | | | 4,063,656 | | | |
CBRL Group, Inc. |
| 662 | | | Term Loan, 1.96%, Maturing April 27, 2013 | | | 638,574 | | | |
| 6,557 | | | Term Loan, 1.98%, Maturing April 27, 2013 | | | 6,324,008 | | | |
JRD Holdings, Inc. |
| 2,887 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing June 26, 2014 | | | 2,778,467 | | | |
Maine Beverage Co., LLC |
| 1,925 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 30, 2010 | | | 1,780,625 | | | |
OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC |
| 1,067 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing May 9, 2013 | | | 891,841 | | | |
| 12,124 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 9, 2014 | | | 10,130,061 | | | |
QCE Finance, LLC |
| 8,894 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 7,200,119 | | | |
Sagittarius Restaurants, LLC |
| 4,299 | | | Term Loan, 9.75%, Maturing March 29, 2013 | | | 3,997,974 | | | |
Selecta |
CHF | 18,405 | | | Term Loan, 2.88%, Maturing June 28, 2015 | | | 13,365,448 | | | |
SSP Financing, Ltd. |
| 3,955 | | | Term Loan, 3.18%, Maturing June 15, 2014 | | | 2,060,303 | | | |
| 3,955 | | | Term Loan, 3.68%, Maturing June 15, 2015 | | | 2,060,303 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 109,074,247 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food / Drug Retailers — 2.4% |
|
General Nutrition Centers, Inc. |
| 21,691 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing September 16, 2013 | | $ | 20,131,787 | | | |
Pantry, Inc. (The) |
| 62 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 58,516 | | | |
| 6,706 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 6,358,568 | | | |
Rite Aid Corp. |
| 30,610 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing June 1, 2014 | | | 26,547,666 | | | |
| 13,952 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 13,114,673 | | | |
| 11,500 | | | Term Loan, 9.50%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 11,921,671 | | | |
Roundy’s Supermarkets, Inc. |
| 24,418 | | | Term Loan, 6.03%, Maturing November 3, 2011 | | | 24,092,049 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 102,224,930 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Forest Products — 1.6% |
|
Appleton Papers, Inc. |
| 11,403 | | | Term Loan, 6.63%, Maturing June 5, 2014 | | $ | 10,376,581 | | | |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. |
| 40,320 | | | Term Loan, 2.32%, Maturing December 20, 2012 | | | 38,920,266 | | | |
| 3,931 | | | Term Loan, 2.33%, Maturing December 20, 2012 | | | 3,794,356 | | | |
| 8,368 | | | Term Loan, 3.59%, Maturing December 23, 2014 | | | 8,328,425 | | | |
Xerium Technologies, Inc. |
| 8,852 | | | Term Loan, 5.78%, Maturing May 18, 2012 | | | 7,258,745 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 68,678,373 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care — 9.3% |
|
1-800 Contacts, Inc. |
| 3,990 | | | Term Loan, 7.70%, Maturing March 4, 2015 | | $ | 3,970,000 | | | |
Accellent, Inc. |
| 3,096 | | | Term Loan, 2.87%, Maturing November 22, 2012 | | | 2,943,568 | | | |
Alliance Imaging, Inc. |
| 4,635 | | | Term Loan, 2.86%, Maturing December 29, 2011 | | | 4,495,018 | | | |
American Medical Systems |
| 4,172 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 20, 2012 | | | 4,056,890 | | | |
AMN Healthcare, Inc. |
| 3,191 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing November 2, 2011 | | | 2,983,136 | | | |
AMR HoldCo, Inc. |
| 5,353 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing February 10, 2012 | | | 5,152,687 | | | |
Biomet, Inc. |
| 16,050 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing December 26, 2014 | | | 15,453,288 | | | |
EUR | 2,915 | | | Term Loan, 3.58%, Maturing December 26, 2014 | | | 4,105,465 | | | |
Cardinal Health 409, Inc. |
| 14,560 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing April 10, 2014 | | | 12,696,189 | | | |
See notes to financial statements26
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Health Care (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Carestream Health, Inc. |
| 15,489 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing April 30, 2013 | | $ | 14,523,716 | | | |
Carl Zeiss Vision Holding GmbH |
EUR | 6,371 | | | Term Loan, 2.93%, Maturing March 23, 2015 | | | 6,680,375 | | | |
Community Health Systems, Inc. |
| 2,135 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 1,993,990 | | | |
| 60,842 | | | Term Loan, 2.61%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 56,814,618 | | | |
Concentra, Inc. |
| 6,860 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 25, 2014 | | | 6,396,867 | | | |
CRC Health Corp. |
| 1,877 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing February 6, 2013 | | | 1,679,803 | | | |
| 3,783 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing February 6, 2013 | | | 3,385,785 | | | |
Dako EQT Project Delphi |
| 1,568 | | | Term Loan, 2.41%, Maturing June 12, 2016 | | | 1,286,007 | | | |
EUR | 3,099 | | | Term Loan, 2.81%, Maturing June 12, 2016 | | | 3,739,167 | | | |
DaVita, Inc. |
| 13,754 | | | Term Loan, 1.76%, Maturing October 5, 2012 | | | 13,230,151 | | | |
DJO Finance, LLC |
| 4,975 | | | Term Loan, 3.26%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 4,806,788 | | | |
Fenwal, Inc. |
| 509 | | | Term Loan, 2.62%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 445,555 | | | |
| 2,976 | | | Term Loan, 2.62%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 2,606,494 | | | |
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings |
| 6,630 | | | Term Loan, 1.66%, Maturing March 31, 2013 | | | 6,384,198 | | | |
Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. |
| 3,302 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing May 30, 2013 | | | 3,140,932 | | | |
HCA, Inc. |
| 56,481 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing November 18, 2013 | | | 52,711,375 | | | |
Health Management Association, Inc. |
| 25,193 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 23,432,575 | | | |
HealthSouth Corp. |
| 3,602 | | | Term Loan, 2.55%, Maturing March 10, 2013 | | | 3,440,308 | | | |
| 5,000 | | | Term Loan, 2.65%, Maturing March 10, 2013 | | | 4,550,000 | | | |
| 2,965 | | | Term Loan, 4.05%, Maturing March 15, 2014 | | | 2,905,646 | | | |
Iasis Healthcare, LLC |
| 110 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 14, 2014 | | | 104,041 | | | |
| 319 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 14, 2014 | | | 300,640 | | | |
| 30 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 14, 2014 | | | 28,096 | | | |
Ikaria Acquisition, Inc. |
| 4,413 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing March 28, 2013 | | | 4,140,684 | | | |
IM U.S. Holdings, LLC |
| 6,520 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing June 26, 2014 | | | 6,177,395 | | | |
inVentiv Health, Inc. |
| 7,903 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing July 6, 2014 | | | 7,409,145 | | | |
LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. |
| 11,291 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing April 15, 2012 | | | 10,966,149 | | | |
MultiPlan Merger Corp. |
| 3,342 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 3,164,621 | | | |
| 4,891 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 4,631,969 | | | |
Mylan, Inc. |
| 13,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.55%, Maturing October 2, 2014 | | | 12,675,000 | | | |
National Mentor Holdings, Inc. |
| 8,776 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 7,904,185 | | | |
| 537 | | | Term Loan, 4.59%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 483,729 | | | |
Nyco Holdings |
| 5,311 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing December 29, 2014 | | | 4,925,681 | | | |
EUR | 6,019 | | | Term Loan, 2.93%, Maturing December 29, 2014 | | | 8,234,720 | | | |
| 5,311 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing December 29, 2015 | | | 4,925,681 | | | |
EUR | 6,019 | | | Term Loan, 3.68%, Maturing December 29, 2015 | | | 8,234,720 | | | |
Psychiatric Solutions, Inc. |
| 985 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing May 31, 2014 | | | 942,816 | | | |
RadNet Management, Inc. |
| 5,913 | | | Term Loan, 4.54%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 5,705,608 | | | |
ReAble Therapeutics Finance, LLC |
| 8,878 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing November 16, 2013 | | | 8,478,350 | | | |
Select Medical Holdings Corp. |
| 950 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.72%, Maturing February 24, 2010(3) | | | 855,000 | | | |
| 1,082 | | | Term Loan, 4.16%, Maturing August 5, 2014 | | | 1,062,175 | | | |
| 8,007 | | | Term Loan, 4.16%, Maturing August 5, 2014 | | | 8,026,607 | | | |
Sunrise Medical Holdings, Inc. |
| 3,534 | | | Term Loan, 8.25%, Maturing May 13, 2010 | | | 2,562,234 | | | |
TZ Merger Sub., Inc. (TriZetto) |
| 4,975 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing July 24, 2015 | | | 4,999,749 | | | |
Vanguard Health Holding Co., LLC |
| 11,583 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing September 23, 2011 | | | 11,322,137 | | | |
Viant Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,783 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 25, 2014 | | | 1,738,685 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 400,010,408 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Home Furnishings — 1.2% |
|
Dometic Corp. |
| 914 | | | Term Loan, 1.51%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | $ | 754,288 | | | |
| 2,057 | | | Term Loan, 1.51%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 1,028,575 | | | |
See notes to financial statements27
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Home Furnishings (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 1,029 | | | Term Loan, 3.76%, Maturing December 31, 2014(2) | | $ | 77,143 | | | |
Hunter Fan Co. |
| 3,612 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 16, 2014 | | | 2,600,792 | | | |
Interline Brands, Inc. |
| 1,323 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing June 23, 2013 | | | 1,220,596 | | | |
| 5,583 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 23, 2013 | | | 5,150,361 | | | |
National Bedding Co., LLC |
| 12,558 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing August 31, 2011 | | | 11,459,024 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.31%, Maturing August 31, 2012 | | | 1,215,000 | | | |
Oreck Corp. |
| 4,164 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing February 2, 2012(5)(7) | | | 1,495,021 | | | |
Simmons Co. |
| 25,024 | | | Term Loan, 10.50%, Maturing December 19, 2011 | | | 24,820,797 | | | |
| 2,726 | | | Term Loan, 7.35%, Maturing February 15, 2012(2) | | | 81,773 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 49,903,370 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Equipment — 2.3% |
|
Baxi Group, Ltd. |
EUR | 3,254 | | | Revolving Loan, 1.00%, Maturing December 27, 2010(3) | | $ | 3,567,178 | | | |
GBP | 1,297 | | | Term Loan, 3.66%, Maturing December 27, 2010 | | | 1,997,770 | | | |
| 500 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 27, 2011(4) | | | 470,875 | | | |
| 500 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 27, 2012(4) | | | 470,875 | | | |
Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services, Inc. |
| 9,960 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing February 7, 2014 | | | 9,013,799 | | | |
CEVA Group PLC U.S. |
| 330 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 278,738 | | | |
| 40 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 33,051 | | | |
EUR | 640 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 782,852 | | | |
EUR | 1,086 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 1,329,371 | | | |
EUR | 1,335 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 1,633,805 | | | |
EUR | 1,136 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 1,390,117 | | | |
EPD Holdings (Goodyear Engineering Products) |
| 2,361 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 13, 2014 | | | 1,910,621 | | | |
| 12,930 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 13, 2014 | | | 10,465,027 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.00%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 1,220,000 | | | |
Flowserve Corp. |
| 3,561 | | | Term Loan, 1.81%, Maturing August 10, 2012 | | | 3,489,643 | | | |
Generac Acquisition Corp. |
| 9,694 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing November 7, 2013 | | | 8,789,624 | | | |
Gleason Corp. |
| 1,518 | | | Term Loan, 2.09%, Maturing June 30, 2013 | | | 1,480,105 | | | |
| 1,941 | | | Term Loan, 2.09%, Maturing June 30, 2013 | | | 1,892,218 | | | |
Jason, Inc. |
| 1,740 | | | Term Loan, 5.03%, Maturing April 30, 2010 | | | 913,592 | | | |
John Maneely Co. |
| 20,958 | | | Term Loan, 3.51%, Maturing December 8, 2013 | | | 19,254,890 | | | |
KION Group GmbH |
EUR | 500 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 23, 2014(4) | | | 509,559 | | | |
| 3,750 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing December 23, 2014 | | | 2,582,812 | | | |
EUR | 500 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 23, 2015(4) | | | 509,559 | | | |
| 3,750 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing December 23, 2015 | | | 2,582,813 | | | |
Polypore, Inc. |
| 2,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.55%, Maturing July 3, 2013(3) | | | 1,630,000 | | | |
| 17,012 | | | Term Loan, 2.46%, Maturing July 3, 2014 | | | 15,927,594 | | | |
EUR | 1,089 | | | Term Loan, 2.64%, Maturing July 3, 2014 | | | 1,491,018 | | | |
TFS Acquisition Corp. |
| 4,401 | | | Term Loan, 14.00%, Maturing August 11, 2013(2) | | | 2,937,701 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 98,555,207 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 1.7% |
|
Alliant Holdings I, Inc. |
| 6,933 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing August 21, 2014 | | $ | 6,465,027 | | | |
Applied Systems, Inc. |
| 7,217 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing September 26, 2013 | | | 6,860,507 | | | |
CCC Information Services Group, Inc. |
| 7,302 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing February 10, 2013 | | | 7,092,467 | | | |
Conseco, Inc. |
| 23,033 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing October 10, 2013 | | | 20,863,743 | | | |
Crump Group, Inc. |
| 3,715 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing August 4, 2014 | | | 3,362,144 | | | |
Hub International Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,636 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 13, 2014 | | | 1,442,685 | | | |
| 11,650 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 13, 2014 | | | 10,276,130 | | | |
| 3,525 | | | Term Loan, Maturing June 30, 2014(4) | | | 3,454,500 | | | |
U.S.I. Holdings Corp. |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing May 4, 2014(4) | | | 1,950,000 | | | |
| 13,927 | | | Term Loan, 3.04%, Maturing May 4, 2014 | | | 12,127,689 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 73,894,892 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements28
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Leisure Goods / Activities / Movies — 5.3% |
|
24 Hour Fitness Worldwide, Inc. |
| 2,922 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing June 8, 2012 | | $ | 2,736,683 | | | |
AMC Entertainment, Inc. |
| 17,353 | | | Term Loan, 1.74%, Maturing January 26, 2013 | | | 16,431,004 | | | |
AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc. |
| 2,945 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 8, 2013 | | | 2,513,375 | | | |
Bombardier Recreational Products |
| 17,400 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing June 28, 2013 | | | 12,223,500 | | | |
Carmike Cinemas, Inc. |
| 5,213 | | | Term Loan, 3.54%, Maturing May 19, 2012 | | | 5,060,038 | | | |
| 6,956 | | | Term Loan, 4.24%, Maturing May 19, 2012 | | | 6,751,738 | | | |
Cedar Fair, L.P. |
| 2,211 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing August 31, 2011 | | | 2,129,889 | | | |
| 2,731 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing August 30, 2012 | | | 2,630,048 | | | |
| 7,447 | | | Term Loan, 4.24%, Maturing February 17, 2014 | | | 7,223,252 | | | |
| 3,773 | | | Term Loan, 4.27%, Maturing February 17, 2014 | | | 3,659,482 | | | |
Cinemark, Inc. |
| 24,097 | | | Term Loan, 2.07%, Maturing October 5, 2013 | | | 22,918,339 | | | |
Dave & Buster’s, Inc. |
| 815 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing March 8, 2013 | | | 799,147 | | | |
| 2,055 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing March 8, 2013 | | | 2,013,779 | | | |
Deluxe Entertainment Services |
| 4,576 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing January 28, 2011 | | | 4,278,378 | | | |
| 271 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing January 28, 2011 | | | 253,791 | | | |
| 471 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing January 28, 2011 | | | 440,759 | | | |
DW Funding, LLC |
| 2,922 | | | Term Loan, 2.17%, Maturing April 30, 2011 | | | 2,556,701 | | | |
Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. |
| 5,727 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing March 16, 2012 | | | 5,433,435 | | | |
Fender Musical Instruments Corp. |
| 1,297 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 9, 2014 | | | 1,108,850 | | | |
| 4,523 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 9, 2014 | | | 3,866,767 | | | |
Mega Blocks, Inc. |
| 1,867 | | | Term Loan, 9.75%, Maturing July 26, 2012 | | | 1,073,323 | | | |
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Holdings, Inc. |
| 37,477 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing April 8, 2012(5) | | | 21,567,755 | | | |
National CineMedia, LLC |
| 14,250 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing February 13, 2015 | | | 13,332,656 | | | |
Odeon |
GBP | 624 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing April 2, 2015 | | | 944,934 | | | |
GBP | 624 | | | Term Loan, 3.65%, Maturing April 2, 2016 | | | 944,934 | | | |
Red Football, Ltd. |
GBP | 1,576 | | | Term Loan, 3.02%, Maturing August 16, 2014 | | | 2,372,985 | | | |
GBP | 1,576 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing August 16, 2015 | | | 2,372,985 | | | |
Regal Cinemas Corp. |
| 18,380 | | | Term Loan, 4.03%, Maturing November 10, 2010 | | | 18,257,030 | | | |
Revolution Studios Distribution Co., LLC |
| 5,591 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing December 21, 2014 | | | 5,087,601 | | | |
Six Flags Theme Parks, Inc. |
| 12,327 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing April 30, 2015 | | | 12,090,028 | | | |
Southwest Sports Group, LLC |
| 9,500 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing December 22, 2010 | | | 7,980,000 | | | |
Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. |
| 8,996 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing June 9, 2011 | | | 8,973,597 | | | |
| 15,900 | | | Term Loan, Maturing November 6, 2014(4) | | | 15,661,500 | | | |
Zuffa, LLC |
| 4,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 1.75%, Maturing June 19, 2012(3) | | | 3,320,000 | | | |
| 9,142 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing June 20, 2016 | | | 8,250,508 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 227,258,791 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lodging and Casinos — 2.6% |
|
Choctaw Resort Development Enterprise |
| 2,308 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing November 4, 2011 | | $ | 2,296,752 | | | |
Full Moon Holdco 3, Ltd. |
GBP | 1,500 | | | Term Loan, 3.86%, Maturing November 20, 2014 | | | 2,158,243 | | | |
GBP | 1,500 | | | Term Loan, 4.36%, Maturing November 20, 2015 | | | 2,158,243 | | | |
Gala Electric Casinos, Ltd. |
GBP | 1,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 12, 2013(4) | | | 1,440,145 | | | |
GBP | 1,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 12, 2014(4) | | | 1,440,247 | | | |
Green Valley Ranch Gaming, LLC |
| 6,961 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing February 16, 2014 | | | 4,916,555 | | | |
Harrah’s Operating Co. |
| 4,051 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing January 28, 2015 | | | 3,232,577 | | | |
| 2,391 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing January 28, 2015 | | | 1,910,913 | | | |
| 8,000 | | | Term Loan, 9.50%, Maturing October 31, 2016 | | | 7,837,776 | | | |
Herbst Gaming, Inc. |
| 2,319 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing December 2, 2011(5) | | | 1,288,868 | | | |
| 6,245 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing December 2, 2011(5) | | | 3,471,064 | | | |
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. |
| 535 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing November 30, 2013 | | | 503,711 | | | |
| 3,562 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing November 30, 2013 | | | 3,353,584 | | | |
See notes to financial statements29
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Lodging and Casinos (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 5,436 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing November 30, 2013 | | $ | 5,117,665 | | | |
LodgeNet Entertainment Corp. |
| 11,499 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing April 4, 2014 | | | 10,559,946 | | | |
New World Gaming Partners, Ltd. |
| 949 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing June 30, 2014 | | | 786,812 | | | |
| 9,600 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing June 30, 2014 | | | 7,955,871 | | | |
Penn National Gaming, Inc. |
| 17,077 | | | Term Loan, 2.01%, Maturing October 3, 2012 | | | 16,551,736 | | | |
Scandic Hotels |
EUR | 1,725 | | | Term Loan, 3.60%, Maturing April 25, 2015 | | | 1,947,886 | | | |
EUR | 1,725 | | | Term Loan, 3.97%, Maturing April 25, 2016 | | | 1,947,886 | | | |
Venetian Casino Resort/Las Vegas Sands, Inc. |
| 8,894 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 14, 2014 | | | 7,259,796 | | | |
| 22,808 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 23, 2014 | | | 18,617,302 | | | |
VML US Finance, LLC |
| 3,317 | | | Term Loan, 5.79%, Maturing May 25, 2012 | | | 3,082,842 | | | |
| 1,990 | | | Term Loan, 5.79%, Maturing May 25, 2013 | | | 1,849,705 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 111,686,125 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Nonferrous Metals / Minerals — 0.8% |
|
Compass Minerals Group, Inc. |
| 1,274 | | | Term Loan, 1.76%, Maturing December 22, 2012 | | $ | 1,260,765 | | | |
Euramax International, Inc. |
GBP | 473 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 469,355 | | | |
| 744 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 450,151 | | | |
GBP | 468 | | | Term Loan, 14.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013(2) | | | 465,008 | | | |
| 730 | | | Term Loan, 14.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013(2) | | | 441,871 | | | |
Noranda Aluminum Acquisition |
| 6,772 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing May 18, 2014 | | | 5,501,878 | | | |
Novelis, Inc. |
| 1,994 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing June 28, 2014 | | | 1,800,624 | | | |
| 4,387 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing June 28, 2014 | | | 3,961,487 | | | |
Oxbow Carbon and Mineral Holdings |
| 15,827 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing May 8, 2014 | | | 15,055,145 | | | |
| 1,510 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing May 8, 2014 | | | 1,436,065 | | | |
Tube City IMS Corp. |
| 476 | | | Term Loan, 1.83%, Maturing January 25, 2014 | | | 442,159 | | | |
| 3,827 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing January 25, 2014 | | | 3,556,617 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 34,841,125 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas — 1.7% |
|
Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P. |
| 5,186 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing July 20, 2014 | | $ | 5,101,750 | | | |
Citgo Petroleum Corp. |
| 5,753 | | | Term Loan, 1.72%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 5,432,858 | | | |
Dresser, Inc. |
| 13,095 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing May 4, 2014 | | | 12,278,874 | | | |
Dynegy Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,642 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing April 2, 2013 | | | 1,581,275 | | | |
| 30,804 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing April 2, 2013 | | | 29,670,217 | | | |
Enterprise GP Holdings, L.P. |
| 2,376 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing October 31, 2014 | | | 2,298,780 | | | |
Hercules Offshore, Inc. |
| 3,965 | | | Term Loan, 8.50%, Maturing July 6, 2013 | | | 3,829,619 | | | |
Precision Drilling Corp. |
| 4,000 | | | Term Loan, 4.58%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 3,940,000 | | | |
| 4,813 | | | Term Loan, 9.25%, Maturing September 30, 2014 | | | 4,836,563 | | | |
Targa Resources, Inc. |
| 1,177 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing October 31, 2012 | | | 1,158,184 | | | |
| 1,351 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing October 31, 2012 | | | 1,329,906 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 71,458,026 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Publishing — 7.0% |
|
American Media Operations, Inc. |
| 24,072 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing January 31, 2013(2) | | $ | 21,860,143 | | | |
Aster Zweite Beteiligungs GmbH |
| 6,825 | | | Term Loan, 2.89%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 5,924,100 | | | |
EUR | 708 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 907,117 | | | |
Black Press US Partnership |
| 1,231 | | | Term Loan, 2.37%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 806,453 | | | |
| 2,028 | | | Term Loan, 2.37%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 1,328,275 | | | |
CanWest MediaWorks, Ltd. |
| 5,270 | | | Term Loan, 4.75%, Maturing July 10, 2014 | | | 4,242,752 | | | |
Dex Media West, LLC |
| 3,822 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing October 24, 2014 | | | 3,375,774 | | | |
GateHouse Media Operating, Inc. |
| 4,916 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 1,913,162 | | | |
| 15,664 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 6,095,895 | | | |
| 9,350 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 3,638,711 | | | |
Getty Images, Inc. |
| 10,579 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing July 2, 2015 | | | 10,653,440 | | | |
Hanley-Wood, LLC |
| 7,369 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing March 8, 2014 | | | 3,159,352 | | | |
See notes to financial statements30
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Publishing (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Idearc, Inc. |
| 41,609 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing November 17, 2014(5) | | $ | 19,028,815 | | | |
Lamar Media Corp. |
| 5,924 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing March 31, 2013 | | | 5,912,872 | | | |
Laureate Education, Inc. |
| 2,117 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing August 17, 2014 | | | 1,929,462 | | | |
| 14,141 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing August 17, 2014 | | | 12,889,278 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing August 31, 2014 | | | 3,000,000 | | | |
Local Insight Regatta Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,683 | | | Term Loan, 7.75%, Maturing April 23, 2015 | | | 1,321,209 | | | |
MediaNews Group, Inc. |
| 7,330 | | | Term Loan, 4.74%, Maturing August 25, 2010 | | | 2,267,787 | | | |
| 3,343 | | | Term Loan, 4.74%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 1,034,368 | | | |
Mediannuaire Holding |
EUR | 4,100 | | | Term Loan, 1.93%, Maturing October 24, 2013 | | | 5,356,858 | | | |
EUR | 1,871 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 1,990,219 | | | |
EUR | 1,871 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing October 10, 2015 | | | 1,989,669 | | | |
Merrill Communications, LLC |
| 9,854 | | | Term Loan, 8.50%, Maturing December 24, 2012 | | | 7,821,803 | | | |
Nelson Education, Ltd. |
| 294 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing July 5, 2014 | | | 258,720 | | | |
Newspaper Holdings, Inc. |
| 18,303 | | | Term Loan, 1.81%, Maturing July 24, 2014 | | | 10,066,630 | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC |
| 39,007 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing August 9, 2013 | | | 36,406,362 | | | |
| 6,900 | | | Term Loan, 3.99%, Maturing May 1, 2016 | | | 6,491,741 | | | |
Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC |
| 2,061 | | | Term Loan, 12.50%, Maturing March 30, 2010 | | | 2,075,541 | | | |
| 5,003 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013(5) | | | 1,150,608 | | | |
R.H. Donnelley, Inc. |
| 1,612 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing June 30, 2011 | | | 1,413,174 | | | |
Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. (The) |
| 7,596 | | | DIP Loan, 13.50%, Maturing August 21, 2010 | | | 7,912,213 | | | |
| 8,161 | | | Revolving Loan, 4.54%, Maturing March 3, 2014 | | | 4,011,077 | | | |
| 32,865 | | | Term Loan, 4.25%, Maturing March 3, 2014 | | | 16,153,179 | | | |
| 2,934 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing March 3, 2014 | | | 1,442,170 | | | |
SGS International, Inc. |
| 1,047 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing December 30, 2011 | | | 1,002,340 | | | |
| 971 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing December 30, 2011 | | | 929,911 | | | |
Source Interlink Companies, Inc. |
| 1,801 | | | Term Loan, 10.75%, Maturing June 18, 2012 | | | 1,773,671 | | | |
| 2,290 | | | Term Loan, 10.75%, Maturing June 18, 2013 | | | 1,889,169 | | | |
| 1,195 | | | Term Loan, 15.00%, Maturing June 18, 2013(2) | | | 418,100 | | | |
Source Media, Inc. |
| 10,299 | | | Term Loan, 5.29%, Maturing November 8, 2011 | | | 8,548,507 | | | |
Springer Science+Business Media S.A. |
| 845 | | | Term Loan, 3.10%, Maturing May 5, 2010 | | | 794,834 | | | |
Star Tribune Co. (The) |
| 1,262 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing September 28, 2014(7) | | | 1,003,469 | | | |
| 841 | | | Term Loan, 11.00%, Maturing September 28, 2014(7) | | | 585,673 | | | |
Trader Media Corp. |
GBP | 12,137 | | | Term Loan, 2.64%, Maturing March 23, 2015 | | | 17,055,896 | | | |
Tribune Co. |
| 1,667 | | | DIP Revolving Loan, 3.50%, Maturing April 10, 2010(3) | | | 1,625,000 | | | |
| 1,667 | | | DIP Term Loan, 9.00%, Maturing April 10, 2010(3) | | | 1,675,000 | | | |
| 4,791 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing April 10, 2010(5) | | | 2,231,739 | | | |
| 8,553 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing May 17, 2014(5) | | | 4,052,015 | | | |
| 18,925 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing May 17, 2014(5) | | | 8,549,880 | | | |
Xsys, Inc. |
| 7,702 | | | Term Loan, 2.89%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 6,684,967 | | | |
EUR | 792 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 1,013,387 | | | |
EUR | 2,750 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 3,520,925 | | | |
| 7,867 | | | Term Loan, 2.89%, Maturing September 27, 2014 | | | 6,828,178 | | | |
EUR | 2,690 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing September 27, 2014 | | | 3,443,764 | | | |
EUR | 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.40%, Maturing September 27, 2015 | | | 848,652 | | | |
Yell Group, PLC |
| 8,025 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing February 10, 2013 | | | 5,778,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 296,082,006 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Radio and Television — 5.4% |
|
Block Communications, Inc. |
| 6,839 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing December 22, 2011 | | $ | 6,325,693 | | | |
Citadel Broadcasting Corp. |
| 32,925 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 12, 2014 | | | 22,677,094 | | | |
See notes to financial statements31
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Radio and Television (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
CMP Susquehanna Corp. |
| 3,815 | | | Revolving Loan, 2.43%, Maturing May 5, 2011(3) | | $ | 2,689,401 | | | |
| 10,022 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 7,433,309 | | | |
Cumulus Media, Inc. |
| 12,721 | | | Term Loan, 4.25%, Maturing June 11, 2014 | | | 10,478,876 | | | |
Discovery Communications, Inc. |
| 4,754 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 4,624,458 | | | |
Emmis Operating Co. |
| 6,892 | | | Term Loan, 4.28%, Maturing November 2, 2013 | | | 5,301,226 | | | |
Gray Television, Inc. |
| 8,418 | | | Term Loan, 3.79%, Maturing January 19, 2015 | | | 7,255,094 | | | |
HIT Entertainment, Inc. |
| 1,446 | | | Term Loan, 2.73%, Maturing March 20, 2012 | | | 1,266,954 | | | |
Intelsat Corp. |
| 18,494 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 17,514,223 | | | |
| 18,488 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 17,508,910 | | | |
| 18,488 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 17,508,910 | | | |
Ion Media Networks, Inc. |
| 2,381 | | | DIP Loan, 10.17%, Maturing May 29, 2010(3)(7) | | | 3,745,058 | | | |
| 14,925 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing January 15, 2012(5) | | | 3,780,995 | | | |
Local TV Finance, LLC |
| 1,955 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing May 7, 2013 | | | 1,573,775 | | | |
NEP II, Inc. |
| 4,565 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing February 16, 2014 | | | 4,222,185 | | | |
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. |
| 9,783 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing October 1, 2012 | | | 8,780,192 | | | |
| 9,197 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing October 1, 2012 | | | 8,254,163 | | | |
Raycom TV Broadcasting, LLC |
| 8,333 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing June 25, 2014 | | | 6,916,699 | | | |
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. |
| 11,663 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 10, 2012 | | | 9,680,411 | | | |
Tyrol Acquisition 2 SAS |
EUR | 6,300 | | | Term Loan, 2.43%, Maturing January 19, 2015 | | | 8,061,483 | | | |
EUR | 6,300 | | | Term Loan, 3.40%, Maturing January 19, 2016 | | | 8,061,483 | | | |
Univision Communications, Inc. |
| 52,733 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing September 29, 2014 | | | 42,638,554 | | | |
Young Broadcasting, Inc. |
| 973 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing November 3, 2012(5) | | | 634,556 | | | |
| 8,285 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing November 3, 2012(5) | | | 5,405,653 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 232,339,355 | | | |
|
|
|
Rail Industries — 0.2% |
|
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. |
| 7,835 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing April 26, 2013 | | $ | 7,443,572 | | | |
| 1,955 | | | Term Loan, 1.78%, Maturing April 28, 2013 | | | 1,808,375 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,251,947 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Retailers (Except Food and Drug) — 2.0% |
|
American Achievement Corp. |
| 2,685 | | | Term Loan, 6.26%, Maturing March 25, 2011 | | $ | 2,416,875 | | | |
Amscan Holdings, Inc. |
| 4,363 | | | Term Loan, 2.65%, Maturing May 25, 2013 | | | 3,963,171 | | | |
Cumberland Farms, Inc. |
| 2,846 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing September 29, 2013 | | | 2,604,320 | | | |
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. |
| 5,998 | | | Term Loan, 9.75%, Maturing July 15, 2010 | | | 6,020,360 | | | |
Josten’s Corp. |
| 5,046 | | | Term Loan, 2.32%, Maturing October 4, 2011 | | | 5,004,370 | | | |
Mapco Express, Inc. |
| 3,489 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing April 28, 2011 | | | 3,227,236 | | | |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. |
| 2,967 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing April 5, 2013 | | | 2,552,652 | | | |
Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. |
| 9,560 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 8,490,408 | | | |
Oriental Trading Co., Inc. |
| 17,365 | | | Term Loan, 9.75%, Maturing July 31, 2013 | | | 14,434,732 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.24%, Maturing January 31, 2013 | | | 485,000 | | | |
Rent-A-Center, Inc. |
| 5,310 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 5,203,420 | | | |
Rover Acquisition Corp. |
| 2,935 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing October 26, 2013 | | | 2,829,816 | | | |
Savers, Inc. |
| 2,748 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing August 11, 2012 | | | 2,651,350 | | | |
| 3,006 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing August 11, 2012 | | | 2,901,005 | | | |
Vivarte |
EUR | 63 | | | Term Loan, 2.43%, Maturing May 29, 2015 | | | 75,293 | | | |
EUR | 244 | | | Term Loan, 2.43%, Maturing May 29, 2015 | | | 292,806 | | | |
EUR | 4,614 | | | Term Loan, 2.43%, Maturing May 29, 2015 | | | 5,533,827 | | | |
EUR | 63 | | | Term Loan, 2.93%, Maturing May 29, 2016 | | | 75,293 | | | |
EUR | 244 | | | Term Loan, 2.93%, Maturing May 29, 2016 | | | 292,806 | | | |
EUR | 4,614 | | | Term Loan, 2.93%, Maturing May 29, 2016 | | | 5,533,827 | | | |
Yankee Candle Company, Inc. (The) |
| 12,867 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing February 6, 2014 | | | 12,047,052 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 86,635,619 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements32
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Steel — 0.2% |
|
Algoma Acquisition Corp. |
| 7,259 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing June 20, 2013 | | $ | 6,853,850 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,853,850 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Surface Transport — 0.5% |
|
Oshkosh Truck Corp. |
| 10,698 | | | Term Loan, 6.32%, Maturing December 6, 2013 | | $ | 10,705,357 | | | |
Swift Transportation Co., Inc. |
| 6,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.54%, Maturing May 10, 2012 | | | 4,990,002 | | | |
| 5,070 | | | Term Loan, 3.56%, Maturing May 10, 2014 | | | 4,380,911 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 20,076,270 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications — 3.0% |
|
Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc. |
| 2,613 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing February 1, 2012 | | $ | 2,503,585 | | | |
| 10,112 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing February 1, 2012 | | | 9,689,534 | | | |
Asurion Corp. |
| 20,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing July 13, 2012 | | | 19,019,440 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.74%, Maturing January 13, 2013 | | | 1,904,376 | | | |
BCM Luxembourg, Ltd. |
EUR | 4,962 | | | Term Loan, 2.30%, Maturing September 30, 2014 | | | 6,442,995 | | | |
EUR | 4,962 | | | Term Loan, 2.55%, Maturing September 30, 2015 | | | 6,443,351 | | | |
Cellular South, Inc. |
| 6,783 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 29, 2014 | | | 6,511,311 | | | |
| 2,974 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 29, 2014 | | | 2,854,845 | | | |
Centennial Cellular Operating Co., LLC |
| 4,500 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.50%, Maturing February 9, 2010(3) | | | 4,252,500 | | | |
| 8,275 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing February 9, 2011 | | | 8,240,109 | | | |
CommScope, Inc. |
| 10,750 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing November 19, 2014 | | | 10,421,762 | | | |
Crown Castle Operating Co. |
| 3,980 | | | Term Loan, 1.78%, Maturing January 9, 2014 | | | 3,831,463 | | | |
Intelsat Subsidiary Holding Co. |
| 7,578 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing July 3, 2013 | | | 7,293,797 | | | |
Iowa Telecommunications Services |
| 2,500 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing November 23, 2011 | | | 2,411,328 | | | |
IPC Systems, Inc. |
| 8,571 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing May 31, 2014 | | | 7,328,556 | | | |
GBP | 345 | | | Term Loan, 2.80%, Maturing May 31, 2014 | | | 407,527 | | | |
Macquarie UK Broadcast Ventures, Ltd. |
GBP | 6,867 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing December 26, 2014 | | | 9,749,088 | | | |
NTelos, Inc. |
| 6,000 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing August 13, 2015 | | | 6,042,498 | | | |
Palm, Inc. |
| 5,733 | | | Term Loan, 3.79%, Maturing April 24, 2014 | | | 5,083,262 | | | |
Telesat Canada, Inc. |
| 2,770 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing October 22, 2014 | | | 2,664,837 | | | |
Windstream Corp. |
| 4,289 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing December 17, 2015 | | | 4,172,101 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 127,268,265 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Utilities — 2.8% |
|
AEI Finance Holding, LLC |
| 2,114 | | | Revolving Loan, 3.24%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | $ | 1,961,179 | | | |
| 14,345 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing March 30, 2014 | | | 13,304,543 | | | |
BRSP, LLC |
| 4,500 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing June 24, 2014 | | | 4,230,000 | | | |
Calpine Corp. |
| 30,890 | | | DIP Loan, 3.17%, Maturing March 29, 2014 | | | 28,481,347 | | | |
Covanta Energy Corp. |
| 2,789 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing February 9, 2014 | | | 2,656,548 | | | |
| 1,903 | | | Term Loan, 1.79%, Maturing February 9, 2014 | | | 1,812,653 | | | |
Electricinvest Holding Co. |
EUR | 4,170 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, Maturing October 24, 2012(4) | | | 4,909,886 | | | |
NRG Energy, Inc. |
| 18,577 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing June 1, 2014 | | | 17,523,938 | | | |
| 13,198 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing June 1, 2014 | | | 12,450,001 | | | |
NSG Holdings, LLC |
| 202 | | | Term Loan, 1.80%, Maturing June 15, 2014 | | | 192,359 | | | |
| 1,207 | | | Term Loan, 1.80%, Maturing June 15, 2014 | | | 1,147,079 | | | |
TXU Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co., LLC |
| 4,992 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 3,891,964 | | | |
| 9,208 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 7,090,494 | | | |
| 20,665 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 16,063,679 | | | |
See notes to financial statements33
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Utilities (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Vulcan Energy Corp. |
| 3,278 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing December 31, 2015 | | $ | 3,312,591 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 119,028,261 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Senior Floating-Rate Interests | | |
(identified cost $4,581,707,890) | | $ | 4,215,909,716 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes — 0.4% |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Building and Development — 0.2% |
|
Grohe Holding GmbH, Variable Rate |
EUR | 5,000 | | | 3.617%, 1/15/14(8) | | $ | 6,107,351 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,107,351 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics — 0.0% |
|
Wellman Holdings, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes |
| 1,049 | | | 5.00%, 1/29/19(7) | | $ | 386,032 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 386,032 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.0% |
|
Environmental Systems Product Holdings, Inc., Junior Notes |
| 149 | | | 18.00%, 3/31/15(2)(7) | | $ | 119,296 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 119,296 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronics / Electrical — 0.1% |
|
NXP BV/NXP Funding, LLC, Variable Rate |
| 6,300 | | | 3.034%, 10/15/13 | | $ | 4,780,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,780,125 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Radio and Television — 0.0% |
|
Ion Media Networks, Inc., Variable Rate |
| 3,000 | | | 0.00%, 1/15/12(5)(9) | | $ | 780,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 780,000 | | | |
|
|
|
Telecommunications — 0.1% |
|
Qwest Corp., Sr. Notes, Variable Rate |
| 5,850 | | | 3.549%, 6/15/13 | | $ | 5,469,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,469,750 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes | | |
(identified cost $21,935,648) | | $ | 17,642,554 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-Backed Securities — 0.1% |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 877 | | | Alzette European CLO SA, Series 2004-1A, Class E2, 7.273%, 12/15/20(10) | | $ | 87,732 | | | |
| 2,632 | | | Assemblies of God Financial Real Estate, Series 2004-1A, Class A, 6.90%, 6/15/29(9)(10) | | | 2,534,088 | | | |
| 1,044 | | | Avalon Capital Ltd. 3, Series 1A, Class D, 2.357%, 2/24/19(9)(10) | | | 666,258 | | | |
| 1,129 | | | Babson Ltd., Series 2005-1A, Class C1, 2.234%, 4/15/19(9)(10) | | | 731,485 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Bryant Park CDO Ltd., Series 2005-1A, Class C, 2.334%, 1/15/19(9)(10) | | | 227,850 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Carlyle High Yield Partners, Series 2004-6A, Class C, 2.911%, 8/11/16(9)(10) | | | 639,300 | | | |
| 871 | | | Centurion CDO 8 Ltd., Series 2005-8A, Class D, 5.814%, 3/8/17(10) | | | 514,218 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Morgan Stanley Investment Management Croton, Ltd., Series 2005-1A, Class D, 2.234%, 1/15/18(9)(10) | | | 1,007,600 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Asset-Backed Securities | | |
(identified cost $11,496,956) | | $ | 6,408,531 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 0.1% |
|
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Automotive — 0.0% |
|
| 105,145 | | | Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.(11) | | $ | 3,775 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,775 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building and Development — 0.1% |
|
| 23,625 | | | Lafarge Roofing(7)(11) | | $ | 0 | | | |
| 231,354 | | | Sanitec Europe OY B Units(7)(11) | | | 316,639 | | | |
| 231,354 | | | Sanitec Europe OY E Units(7)(11) | | | 0 | | | |
See notes to financial statements34
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
Building and Development (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 3,646 | | | United Subcontractors, Inc.(7)(11) | | $ | 293,917 | | | |
| 22,273 | | | WCI Communities, Inc.(11) | | | 1,559,082 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,169,638 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics — 0.0% |
|
| 3,849 | | | Vita Cayman II, Ltd. | | $ | 164,267 | | | |
| 1,022 | | | Wellman Holdings, Inc.(7)(11) | | | 366,990 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 531,257 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.0% |
|
| 2,484 | | | Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc.(7)(11)(12) | | $ | 34,602 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 34,602 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Service — 0.0% |
|
| 193,076 | | | Buffets, Inc.(11) | | $ | 1,254,994 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,254,994 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Home Furnishings — 0.0% |
|
| 364 | | | Dometic Corp.(7)(11) | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Publishing — 0.0% |
|
| 5,725 | | | Source Interlink Companies, Inc.(7)(11) | | $ | 41,220 | | | |
| 30,631 | | | Star Tribune Co. (The)(7)(11) | | | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 41,220 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $4,469,920) | | $ | 4,035,486 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred Stocks — 0.0% |
|
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Automotive — 0.0% |
|
| 350 | | | Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc., Series A, Convertible(11)(12) | | $ | 91 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 91 | | | |
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.0% |
|
| 1,138 | | | Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc., Series A(7)(11)(12) | | $ | 91,040 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 91,040 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Preferred Stocks | | |
(identified cost $37,415) | | $ | 91,131 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Closed-End Investment Companies — 0.0% |
|
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
| 4,000 | | | Pioneer Floating Rate Trust | | $ | 44,040 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Closed-End Investment Companies | | |
(identified cost $72,148) | | $ | 44,040 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 4.0% |
|
Interest/
| | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 165,515 | | | Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(13) | | $ | 165,515,197 | | | |
| 7,299 | | | State Street Bank and Trust Euro Time Deposit, 0.01%, 11/2/09 | | $ | 7,298,860 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $172,814,057) | | $ | 172,814,057 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 102.8% | | |
(identified cost $4,792,534,034) | | $ | 4,416,945,515 | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | |
Less Unfunded Loan Commitments — (1.5)% | | $ | (66,166,734 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
Net Investments — 101.3% | | |
(identified cost $4,726,367,300) | | $ | 4,350,778,781 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (1.3)% | | $ | (56,438,713 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 4,294,340,068 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
DIP - Debtor in Possession
REIT - Real Estate Investment Trust
CHF - Swiss Franc
EUR - Euro
GBP - British Pound Sterling
See notes to financial statements35
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | |
* | | In U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. |
|
(1) | | Senior floating-rate interests (Senior Loans) often require prepayments from excess cash flows or permit the borrowers to repay at their election. The degree to which borrowers repay, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, cannot be predicted with accuracy. As a result, the actual remaining maturity may be substantially less than the stated maturities shown. However, Senior Loans will have an expected average life of approximately two to four years. The stated interest rate represents the weighted average interest rate of all contracts within the senior loan facility and includes commitment fees on unfunded loan commitments, if any. Senior Loans typically have rates of interest which are redetermined either daily, monthly, quarterly or semi-annually by reference to a base lending rate, plus a premium. These base rates are primarily the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and secondarily, the prime rate offered by one or more major United States banks (the “Prime Rate”) and the certificate of deposit (“CD”) rate or other base lending rates used by commercial lenders. |
|
(2) | | Represents a payment-in-kind security which may pay all or a portion of interest in additional par. |
|
(3) | | Unfunded or partially unfunded loan commitments. See Note 1G for description. |
|
(4) | | This Senior Loan will settle after October 31, 2009, at which time the interest rate will be determined. |
|
(5) | | Currently the issuer is in default with respect to interest payments. |
|
(6) | | Defaulted matured security. |
|
(7) | | Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees. |
|
(8) | | Security exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, which exempts from registration securities offered and sold outside the United States. Security may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. |
|
(9) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $7,100,799 or 0.2% of the Portfolio’s net assets. |
|
(10) | | Variable rate security. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at October 31, 2009. |
|
(11) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(12) | | Restricted security (see Note 5). |
|
(13) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements36
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $4,560,852,103) | | $ | 4,185,263,584 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $165,515,197) | | | 165,515,197 | | | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $22,498,571) | | | 22,456,682 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 15,386,380 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 38,387,913 | | | |
Receivable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 1,219,097 | | | |
Receivable for closed swap contracts | | | 73,813 | | | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 186,528 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 4,428,489,194 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 131,259,920 | | | |
Payable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 414,446 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 1,903,571 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 4,208 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 566,981 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 134,149,126 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 4,294,340,068 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 4,668,753,430 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | | (374,413,362 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 4,294,340,068 | | | |
|
|
Statement of Operations
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 209,771,896 | | | |
Dividends | | | 4,840 | | | |
Interest allocated from affiliated investment | | | 1,053,523 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (898,921 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 209,931,338 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 17,642,597 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 50,500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 770,672 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 1,100,565 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 674,120 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 247,483 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 20,485,937 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 5,743 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 5,743 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 20,480,194 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 189,451,144 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (183,759,510 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | 332,259 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (30,966,324 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (214,393,575 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 966,507,229 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (6,686,629 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 959,820,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 745,427,025 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 934,878,169 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements37
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 189,451,144 | | | $ | 300,321,531 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (214,393,575 | ) | | | (60,661,120 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, swap contracts, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 959,820,600 | | | | (1,233,858,485 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 934,878,169 | | | $ | (994,198,074 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 1,462,810,319 | | | $ | 1,218,146,557 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (1,159,558,768 | ) | | | (4,019,337,678 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | 303,251,551 | | | $ | (2,801,191,121 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 1,238,129,720 | | | $ | (3,795,389,195 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 3,056,210,348 | | | $ | 6,851,599,543 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 4,294,340,068 | | | $ | 3,056,210,348 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements38
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1) | | | 0.61 | % | | | 0.70 | % | | | 0.58 | % | | | 0.54 | % | | | 0.54 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.41 | % | | | 6.50 | % | | | 6.94 | % | | | 6.44 | % | | | 4.68 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 27.54 | % | | | (22.24 | )% | | | 4.62 | % | | | 6.36 | % | | | 4.77 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 4,294,340 | | | $ | 3,056,210 | | | $ | 6,851,600 | | | $ | 7,430,493 | | | $ | 6,506,058 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements39
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Floating Rate Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to provide a high level of current income. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund, Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund, Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund and Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund held an interest of 65.8%, 16.5%, 12.6%, 2.4% and 0.8%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Interests in senior floating-rate loans (Senior Loans) for which reliable market quotations are readily available are valued generally at the average mean of bid and ask quotations obtained from a third party pricing service. Other Senior Loans are valued at fair value by the investment adviser under procedures approved by the Trustees. In fair valuing a Senior Loan, the investment adviser utilizes one or more of the valuation techniques described in (i) through (iii) below to assess the likelihood that the borrower will make a full repayment of the loan underlying such Senior Loan relative to yields on other Senior Loans issued by companies of comparable credit quality. If the investment adviser believes that there is a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using a matrix pricing approach that considers the yield on the Senior Loan. If the investment adviser believes there is not a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using analyses that include, but are not limited to: (i) a comparison of the value of the borrower’s outstanding equity and debt to that of comparable public companies; (ii) a discounted cash flow analysis; or (iii) when the investment adviser believes it is likely that a borrower will be liquidated or sold, an analysis of the terms of such liquidation or sale. In certain cases, the investment adviser will use a combination of analytical methods to determine fair value, such as when only a
portion of a borrower’s assets are likely to be sold. In conducting its assessment and analyses for purposes of determining fair value of a Senior Loan, the investment adviser will use its discretion and judgment in considering and appraising relevant factors. Fair value determinations are made by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio based on information available to such managers. The portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may not possess the same information about a Senior Loan borrower as the portfolio managers of the Portfolio. At times, the fair value of a Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may vary from the fair value of the same Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio. The fair value of each Senior Loan is periodically reviewed and approved by the investment adviser’s Valuation Committee and by the Trustees based upon procedures approved by the Trustees. Junior Loans are valued in the same manner as Senior Loans.
Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of the average bid and average asked prices that are reported by currency dealers to a third party pricing service at the valuation time. Such third party pricing service valuations are supplied for specific settlement periods and the Portfolio’s forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at an interpolated rate
40
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
between the closest preceding and subsequent settlement period reported by the third party pricing service. Credit default swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. The pricing services employ electronic data processing techniques to determine the present value based on credit spread quotations obtained from broker/dealers and expected default recovery rates determined by the pricing service using proprietary models. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities in the same manner as debt obligations described above.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount. Fees associated with loan amendments are recognized immediately. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
41
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Unfunded Loan Commitments — The Portfolio may enter into certain credit agreements all or a portion of which may be unfunded. The Portfolio is obligated to fund these commitments at the borrower’s discretion. These commitments are disclosed in the accompanying Portfolio of Investments.
H Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
I Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
J Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts — The Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. The Portfolio may enter into forward contracts for hedging purposes as well as non-hedging purposes. The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any gains or losses are recorded as unrealized until such time as the contracts have been closed or offset by another contract with the same broker for the same settlement date and currency. Risks may arise upon entering these contracts from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts and from movements in the value of a foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar.
K Credit Default Swaps — The Portfolio may enter into credit default swap contracts to manage its credit risk, to gain exposure to a credit in which the Portfolio may
otherwise invest, or to enhance return. When the Portfolio is the buyer of a credit default swap contract, the Portfolio is entitled to receive the par (or other agreed-upon) value of a referenced debt obligation (or basket of debt obligations) from the counterparty to the contract if a credit event by a third party, such as a U.S. or foreign corporate issuer or sovereign issuer, on the debt obligation occurs. In return, the Portfolio pays the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no credit event has occurred. If no credit event occurs, the Portfolio would have spent the stream of payments and received no benefits from the contract. When the Portfolio is the seller of a credit default swap contract, it receives the stream of payments, but is obligated to pay to the buyer of the protection an amount up to the notional amount of the swap and in certain instances take delivery of securities of the reference entity upon the occurrence of a credit event, as defined under the terms of that particular swap agreement. Credit events are contract specific but may include bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration and repudiation/moratorium. If the Portfolio is a seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Portfolio could be required to make would be an amount equal to the notional amount of the agreement. This potential amount would be partially offset by any recovery value of the respective referenced obligation, or net amount received from the settlement of a buy protection credit default swap agreement entered into by the Portfolio for the same referenced obligation. As the seller, the Portfolio effectively adds leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, the Portfolio is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. The interest fee paid or received on the swap contract, which is based on a specified interest rate on a fixed notional amount, is accrued daily as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and is recorded as realized gain upon receipt or realized loss upon payment. The Portfolio also records an increase or decrease to unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in an amount equal to the daily valuation. Upfront payments or receipts, if any, are recorded as other assets or other liabilities, respectively, and amortized over the life of the swap contract as realized gains or losses. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to the notional amount of the credit default swaps of which it is the seller. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to any unrealized depreciation of the credit default swaps of which it is the buyer, marked to market on a daily basis. These transactions involve certain risks, including the risk that the seller may be unable to fulfill the transaction.
42
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement and subsequent fee reduction agreement between the Portfolio and BMR, the fee is computed at an annual rate 0.575% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $1 billion, 0.525% from $1 billion up to 2 billion, 0.500% from $2 billion up to $5 billion, 0.480% from $5 billion up to $10 billion and 0.460% of average daily net assets of $10 billion or more, and is payable monthly. The fee reduction cannot be terminated without the consent of the Trustees and shareholders. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $18,492,605 of which $850,008 was allocated from Cash Management and $17,642,597 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.53% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations and including maturities and principal repayments on Senior Loans, aggregated $1,536,345,479 and $1,181,885,322 respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 4,726,827,921 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 59,241,865 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (435,291,005 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (376,049,140 | ) | | |
|
|
The net unrealized appreciation on foreign currency at October 31, 2009 on federal income tax basis was $1,175,157.
5 Restricted Securities
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio owned the following securities (representing less than 0.1% of net assets) which were restricted as to public resale and not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (excluding Rule 144A securities). The Portfolio has various registration rights (exercisable under a variety of circumstances) with respect to these securities. The value of these securities is determined based on valuations provided by brokers when available, or if not available, they are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Date of
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Acquisition | | | Shares | | | Cost | | | Value | | | |
|
Common Stocks |
|
Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc. | | | 10/25/07 | | | | 2,484 | | | $ | 0 | (1) | | $ | 34,602 | | | |
|
|
Preferred Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc., Series A | | | 10/25/07 | | | | 1,138 | | | $ | 19,915 | | | $ | 91,040 | | | |
Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc., Series A, Convertible | | | 6/23/03 | | | | 350 | | | | 17,500 | | | | 91 | | | |
|
|
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | | | | | $ | 37,415 | | | $ | 125,733 | | | |
|
|
6 Financial Instruments
The Portfolio may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include forward foreign currency exchange contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Portfolio has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at October 31, 2009 is as follows:
43
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
|
Sales |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | Deliver | | In Exchange For | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
11/30/09 | | British Pound Sterling 60,847,811 | | United States Dollar 99,434,451 | | $ | (414,446 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Euro 192,194,065 | | United States Dollar 283,880,243 | | | 1,054,981 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Euro 2,715,000 | | United States Dollar 4,070,844 | | | 75,556 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Euro 2,655,000 | | United States Dollar 3,973,367 | | | 66,373 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Swiss Franc 13,619,589 | | United States Dollar 13,300,380 | | | 22,187 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 804,651 | | | |
|
|
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815-10), effective May 1, 2009. Such standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. The disclosure below includes additional information as a result of implementing FAS 161.
The Portfolio is subject to foreign exchange risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objective. Because the Portfolio holds foreign currency denominated investments, the value of these investments and related receivables and payables may change due to future changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To hedge against this risk, the Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The Portfolio may also enter into such contracts to hedge currency risk of investments it anticipates purchasing.
The forward foreign currency exchange contracts in which the Portfolio invests are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the contract fails to perform its obligations under the contract. At October 31, 2009, the maximum amount of loss the Portfolio would incur due to counterparty risk was $1,219,097, representing the fair value of such derivatives in an asset position.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is foreign exchange risk at October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value |
| | |
Derivative | | Asset Derivatives | | | Liability Derivatives | | | |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | $ | 1,219,097(1 | ) | | $ | (414,446 | )(2) | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Receivable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts and Net unrealized depreciation. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Payable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts and Net unrealized depreciation. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is foreign exchange risk for the six months ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Change in
| | | |
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | Realized Gain
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
| | (Loss) on
| | | (Depreciation) on
| | | |
| | Derivatives
| | | Derivatives
| | | |
| | Recognized in
| | | Recognized in
| | | |
Derivative | | Income | | | Income | | | |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | $ | (33,309,680 | )(1) | | $ | 2,948,048 | (2) | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts transactions. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts. |
The average notional amount of forward foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009, which is indicative of the volume of this derivative type, was approximately $321,857,000.
7 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million ($1 billion prior to March 23, 2009) unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at a prime rate or an amount above either The London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or the Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.15% (0.08% prior to March 23, 2009) on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of
44
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
each quarter. Average borrowings and average interest rate for the year ended October 31, 2009 were $7,369,910 and 1.76%, respectively.
8 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by companies whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Portfolio, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign securities markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
9 Concentration of Credit Risk
The Portfolio invests primarily in below investment grade floating-rate loans and floating-rate debt obligations, which are considered speculative because of the credit risk of their issuers. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances are more likely to reduce the capacity of issuers of these securities to make principal and interest payments. Such companies are more likely to default on their payments of interest and principal owed than issuers of investment grade bonds. An economic downturn generally leads to a higher non-payment rate, and a loan or other debt obligation may lose significant value before a default occurs. Lower rated investments also may be subject to greater price volatility than higher rated investments. Moreover, the specific collateral used to secure a loan may decline in value or become illiquid, which would adversely affect the loan’s value.
10 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier
hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Senior Floating-Rate Interests (Less unfunded loan commitments) | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,142,913,761 | | | $ | 6,829,221 | | | $ | 4,149,742,982 | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes | | | — | | | | 17,137,226 | | | | 505,328 | | | | 17,642,554 | | | |
Asset-Backed Securities | | | — | | | | 6,408,531 | | | | — | | | | 6,408,531 | | | |
Common Stocks | | | 3,775 | | | | 2,978,343 | | | | 1,053,368 | | | | 4,035,486 | | | |
Preferred Stocks | | | — | | | | 91 | | | | 91,040 | | | | 91,131 | | | |
Closed-End Investment Companies | | | 44,040 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 44,040 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 165,515,197 | | | | 7,298,860 | | | | — | | | | 172,814,057 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 165,563,012 | | | $ | 4,176,736,812 | | | $ | 8,478,957 | | | $ | 4,350,778,781 | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | | — | | | | 1,219,097 | | | | — | | | | 1,219,097 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 165,563,012 | | | $ | 4,177,955,909 | | | $ | 8,478,957 | | | $ | 4,351,997,878 | | | |
|
|
45
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Liability Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Liability Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | $ | — | | | $ | (414,446 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (414,446 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | (414,446 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (414,446 | ) | | |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investments
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | in Senior
| | | Investments
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Floating-
| | | in Corporate
| | | Investments
| | | Investments
| | | | | | |
| | Rate
| | | Bonds &
| | | in Common
| | | in Preferred
| | | | | | |
| | Interests | | | Notes | | | Stocks | | | Stocks | | | Total | | | |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 | | $ | 6,914,981 | | | $ | 107,680 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 26,140 | | | $ | 7,048,801 | | | |
Realized gains (losses) | | | (5,765,532 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (5,765,532 | ) | | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)* | | | 4,804,968 | | | | 60,573 | | | | (100,916 | ) | | | 64,900 | | | | 4,829,525 | | | |
Net purchases (sales) | | | 3,545,627 | | | | 319,149 | | | | 1,154,284 | | | | — | | | | 5,019,060 | | | |
Accrued discount (premium) | | | 23,796 | | | | 17,926 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 41,722 | | | |
Net transfers to (from) Level 3 | | | (2,694,619 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,694,619 | ) | | |
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 | | $ | 6,829,221 | | | $ | 505,328 | | | $ | 1,053,368 | | | $ | 91,040 | | | $ | 8,478,957 | | | |
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments still held as of October 31, 2009* | | $ | (4,188,186 | ) | | $ | 60,573 | | | $ | (60,841 | ) | | $ | 64,900 | | | $ | (4,123,554 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount is included in the related amount on investments in the Statement of Operations. |
11 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 28, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
46
Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Floating Rate Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Floating Rate Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities and senior loans owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and selling or agent banks; where replies were not received from brokers and selling or agent banks, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Floating Rate Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 2009
47
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
48
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreements of Floating Rate Portfolio and High Income Opportunities Portfolio, the portfolios in which Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund (the “Fund”) invests (the “Portfolios”), each with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including their fee structures, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreements for the Portfolios.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreements of the Portfolios, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolios by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolios, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolios. In particular, the Board evaluated the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing special considerations relevant to investing in senior secured floating rate loans. For both Portfolios, the Board noted the experience of the Adviser’s large group of bank loan investment professionals and other personnel who provide services to the Portfolios, including portfolio managers and analysts. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund and each Portfolio by senior management. The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following
49
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreements.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board also considered the performance of the underlying Portfolios. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the Fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolios and the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund, the Portfolios and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund and the Portfolios.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolios increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolios, the structure of the advisory fees, which include breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
50
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust), Floating Rate Portfolio (FRP) and High Income Opportunities Portfolio (HIOP) (collectively, the Portfolios) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolios’ affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolios are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolios hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolios, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolios’ placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolios. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
51
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust and HIOP since 1998 and of FRP since 2000 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolios | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas P. Huggins 3/7/66 | | Vice President of HIOP | | Since 2000 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 4 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Scott H. Page 11/30/59 | | President of FRP | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 11 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Craig P. Russ 10/30/63 | | Vice President of FRP | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 6 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
52
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolios | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael W. Weilheimer 2/11/61 | | President of HIOP | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 24 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of each Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolios and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or on by calling 1-800-262-1122.
53
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Floating Rate Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Administrator of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income FundEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Annual Report October 31, 2009 EATON VANCE GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Fund or Portfolio voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
• | | The year ending October 31, 2009, began on a weak note of deep economic downturn and volatile credit markets. However, the markets and economy showed some positive signs of stabilization as they turned to the 2009 calendar year. Despite significantly negative growth in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, second quarter gross domestic product (GDP) fell just 0.7%. The preliminary numbers for the third quarter of 2009 point to positive annualized GDP growth of 2.8%. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97fbb/97fbb33d47ee2f47e471acc9a4f7d15a81d0f25b" alt="(PHOTO OF SUSAN SCHIFF)"
Susan Schiff, CFA
Portfolio Manager
• | | Throughout the Fund’s fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, the Federal Reserve (the Fed) maintained policy rates between 0% and 0.25%. At its most recent meeting, the Fed identified the high unemployment rate and low capacity utilization rates as indicators of excess or spare capacity in the economy, creating the ability to grow above trend for some time without threatening the outlook for inflation. Although yields have been relatively constant in the long end of the yield curve during the Fund’s fiscal year, yields in the rest of the yield curve have fallen by 50-90 basis points over the period. |
• | | Many of the government’s programs aimed at bolstering the economy came into full swing during the period. Some of these programs have been specifically directed at freeing up capital and providing access to credit. Other programs have more specifically targeted helping existing homeowners avoid foreclosure and maintaining affordability for new homeowners. One of the most significant steps taken was the Fed’s purchase of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) in the secondary market. This program started in January 2009 and was designed to sustain lower mortgage rates. By the end of October 2009, the Fed purchased just under $1 trillion in U.S. Government Agency MBS. The Fed expects to purchase a total of $1.25 trillion in MBS by the end of March 2010. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
• | | As the economy has stabilized, so too have the credit markets. Although the beginning of the fiscal period was marked by widening credit spreads throughout the fixed-income markets, there was a tightening of spreads for the better part of calendar 2009. |
Management Discussion
• | | During the year ending October 31, 2009, the Fund’s1 Class A, Class B, Class C and Class R shares outperformed the Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government Index and the average return of the Lipper Short-Intermediate U.S. Government Classification.2 This outperformance was primarily the result of a substantial tightening in the yield spreads between MBS and Treasuries. In the seasoned MBS market on which the Fund focuses, this spread tightened by more than 140 basis points during the fiscal year. Principal prepayment rates on the Fund’s seasoned MBS were relatively stable for the entire period—paying consistently at an annualized rate in the low teens. |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08 – 10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A3 | | | 11.11 | % |
Class B3 | | | 10.30 | |
Class C3 | | | 10.31 | |
Class I3 | | | 3.29 | * |
Class R3 | | | 10.70 | |
Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government Index2 | | | 6.11 | |
Lipper Short-Intermediate U.S. Government Funds Average2 | | | 7.58 | |
| | |
* | | Performance is cumulative since share class inception on 4/3/09. |
See page 3 for more performance information.
| | |
1 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, Government Obligations Portfolio, with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
2 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value (NAV), of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for the Fund’s Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B shares and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I and Class R shares are offered to certain investors at NAV. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
1
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | The Fund’s investment emphasis remained on seasoned, U.S. Government Agency MBS (seasoned MBS) during the entire period. Typically, seasoned MBS were originated in the 1980s and 1990s. As a result, they have generally lower loan-to-home value ratios, meaning that these homeowners have more equity in their homes than the average borrower. In addition, these loans are guaranteed by government agencies. The Fund had no direct exposure to the subprime lending market or to non-agency MBS during the period. |
• | | As the economy has slowly shown signs of stabilization and positive growth, the Fund shortened its duration from 3.78 years at the beginning of the 12-month period to 2.93 years as of October 31, 2009. Duration indicates price sensitivity to changes in interest rates of a fixed-income security or portfolio based on the timing of anticipated principal and interest payments. A shorter duration instrument normally has less exposure to interest rate risk than a longer duration instrument. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio manager and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
Diversification by Sectors1
By total investments
| | |
1 | | As a percentage of the Portfolio’s total investments as of 10/31/09. |
2
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the Barclays Capital U.S. Intermediate Government Index, an unmanaged index of U.S. government bonds with maturities from one up to (but not including) 10 years. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A of the Fund and in the Barclays Capital Intermediate U.S. Government Index. The chart also offers a comparison with the Lipper Short-Intermediate U.S. Government Funds Classification, the Fund’s peer Classification. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class R |
Class Share Symbol | | EVGOX | | EMGOX | | ECGOX | | EIGOX | | ERGOX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 11.11 | % | | | 10.30 | % | | | 10.31 | % | | | N.A. | | | | 10.70 | % |
Five Years | | | 5.34 | | | | 4.53 | | | | 4.51 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 5.38 | | | | 4.60 | | | | 4.56 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 7.14 | | | | 4.48 | | | | 4.39 | | | | 3.29 | % | | | 5.54 | |
|
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 5.89 | % | | | 5.30 | % | | | 9.31 | % | | | N.A. | | | | 10.70 | % |
Five Years | | | 4.32 | | | | 4.20 | | | | 4.51 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | 4.87 | | | | 4.60 | | | | 4.56 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 6.93 | | | | 4.48 | | | | 4.39 | | | | 3.29 | % | | | 5.54 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates – Class A: 8/24/84; Class B: 11/1/93; Class C: 11/1/93; Class I: 4/3/09; Class R: 8/12/05. |
|
†† | | Returns are cumulative since inception of the share class. |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B or Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I and Class R shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I | | Class R |
|
Gross Expense Ratio | | | 1.19 | % | | | 1.94 | % | | | 1.94 | % | | | 0.94 | % | | | 1.44 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09, as supplemented on 4/1/09 and 5/4/09. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0b1c/a0b1c239d3c402b9b74b0f0c7cfd6a906faad9a2" alt="(GRAPH)"
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced operations on 8/24/84.
A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class B and Class C shares on 10/31/99, Class R shares on 8/12/05 (commencement of operations) and Class I shares on 4/3/09 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $15,679, $15,624, $12,556 and $10,329, respectively, on 10/31/09. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at NAV, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or Lipper Classification. |
3
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09)* | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,029.10 | | | | $5.98 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,025.30 | | | | $9.80 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,025.40 | | | | $9.80 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,030.40 | | | | $4.66 | | | |
Class R | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,027.90 | | | | $7.21 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.30 | | | | $5.95 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.50 | | | | $9.75 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.50 | | | | $9.75 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.60 | | | | $4.63 | | | |
Class R | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.10 | | | | $7.17 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.17% for Class A shares, 1.92% for Class B shares, 1.92% for Class C shares, 0.91% for Class I shares and 1.41% for Class R shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
4
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Government Obligations Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $847,696,928) | | $ | 878,927,995 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 4,613,520 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 883,541,515 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 3,771,660 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 930,236 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 427,622 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 1,350 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 222,750 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 5,353,618 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 878,187,897 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 1,060,765,714 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (212,878,648 | ) | | |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | | | (930,236 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolio | | | 31,231,067 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 878,187,897 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 472,146,629 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 62,619,174 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.54 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 7.92 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 126,122,725 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 16,727,421 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.54 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 259,974,591 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 34,530,297 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.53 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 14,879,006 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 1,974,168 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.54 | | | |
|
|
|
Class R Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 5,064,946 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 674,455 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.51 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest allocated from Portfolio | | | 37,667,316 | | | |
Miscellaneous income | | | 55,440 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (6,142,354 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 31,580,402 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 1,073,100 | | | |
Class B | | | 1,406,622 | | | |
Class C | | | 2,208,097 | | | |
Class R | | | 12,683 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 33,992 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 764,566 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 37,406 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 187,480 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 97,282 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 8,446 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 5,829,674 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 25,750,728 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | 2,955,566 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 7,498,285 | | | |
|
|
Net realized gain | | $ | 10,453,851 | | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 38,037,120 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 1,873,883 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 39,911,003 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 50,364,854 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 76,115,582 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 25,750,728 | | | $ | 22,643,375 | | | |
Net realized gain from investment transactions and financial futures contracts | | | 10,453,851 | | | | 6,883,425 | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and financial futures contracts | | | 39,911,003 | | | | (9,934,170 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 76,115,582 | | | $ | 19,592,630 | | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (18,985,438 | ) | | $ | (15,519,589 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (5,254,253 | ) | | | (6,781,462 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (8,222,184 | ) | | | (6,148,590 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (130,163 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class R | | | (105,276 | ) | | | (23,112 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (1,085,280 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class B | | | (300,353 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class C | | | (470,012 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class I | | | (7,441 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class R | | | (6,018 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (34,566,418 | ) | | $ | (28,472,753 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 263,266,792 | | | $ | 212,119,920 | | | |
Class B | | | 23,146,151 | | | | 34,528,345 | | | |
Class C | | | 146,674,516 | | | | 106,275,591 | | | |
Class I | | | 15,454,856 | | | | — | | | |
Class R | | | 6,483,149 | | | | 843,401 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 14,269,252 | | | | 10,314,729 | | | |
Class B | | | 3,411,688 | | | | 3,996,964 | | | |
Class C | | | 5,126,292 | | | | 3,623,958 | | | |
Class I | | | 130,170 | | | | — | | | |
Class R | | | 104,673 | | | | 19,318 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (202,215,846 | ) | | | (109,962,134 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (43,439,796 | ) | | | (43,283,489 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (74,023,274 | ) | | | (51,459,693 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (747,529 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class R | | | (2,429,962 | ) | | | (260,466 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 12,331,175 | | | | 9,439,980 | | | |
Class B | | | (12,331,175 | ) | | | (9,439,980 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 155,211,132 | | | $ | 166,756,444 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 196,760,296 | | | $ | 157,876,321 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 681,427,601 | | | $ | 523,551,280 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 878,187,897 | | | $ | 681,427,601 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | (930,236 | ) | | $ | (601,496 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 7.110 | | | $ | 7.160 | | | $ | 7.200 | | | $ | 7.340 | | | $ | 7.740 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.267 | | | $ | 0.297 | | | $ | 0.300 | | | $ | 0.266 | | | $ | 0.212 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.512 | | | | 0.020 | | | | 0.053 | | | | 0.037 | | | | (0.090 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 0.779 | | | $ | 0.317 | | | $ | 0.353 | | | $ | 0.303 | | | $ | 0.122 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.330 | ) | | $ | (0.367 | ) | | $ | (0.391 | ) | | $ | (0.424 | ) | | $ | (0.519 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | (0.019 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.002 | ) | | | (0.019 | ) | | | (0.003 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.349 | ) | | $ | (0.367 | ) | | $ | (0.393 | ) | | $ | (0.443 | ) | | $ | (0.522 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 7.540 | | | $ | 7.110 | | | $ | 7.160 | | | $ | 7.200 | | | $ | 7.340 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 11.11 | % | | | 4.45 | % | | | 5.05 | % | | | 4.28 | % | | | 2.03 | %(3) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 472,147 | | | $ | 362,311 | | | $ | 245,687 | | | $ | 251,751 | | | $ | 291,931 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.16 | % | | | 1.19 | % | | | 1.22 | % | | | 1.20 | % | | | 1.18 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.57 | % | | | 4.09 | % | | | 4.19 | % | | | 3.69 | % | | | 2.82 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 28 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 30 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.31% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 7.110 | | | $ | 7.160 | | | $ | 7.200 | | | $ | 7.340 | | | $ | 7.740 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.214 | | | $ | 0.245 | | | $ | 0.247 | | | $ | 0.213 | | | $ | 0.156 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.510 | | | | 0.018 | | | | 0.053 | | | | 0.035 | | | | (0.094 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 0.724 | | | $ | 0.263 | | | $ | 0.300 | | | $ | 0.248 | | | $ | 0.062 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.278 | ) | | $ | (0.313 | ) | | $ | (0.338 | ) | | $ | (0.369 | ) | | $ | (0.459 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | (0.016 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.002 | ) | | | (0.019 | ) | | | (0.003 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.294 | ) | | $ | (0.313 | ) | | $ | (0.340 | ) | | $ | (0.388 | ) | | $ | (0.462 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 7.540 | | | $ | 7.110 | | | $ | 7.160 | | | $ | 7.200 | | | $ | 7.340 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 10.30 | % | | | 3.67 | % | | | 4.27 | % | | | 3.50 | % | | | 1.15 | %(3) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 126,123 | | | $ | 146,987 | | | $ | 162,159 | | | $ | 215,850 | | | $ | 291,079 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.91 | % | | | 1.94 | % | | | 1.97 | % | | | 1.95 | % | | | 1.93 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.87 | % | | | 3.37 | % | | | 3.45 | % | | | 2.95 | % | | | 2.07 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 28 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 30 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.24% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 7.100 | | | $ | 7.150 | | | $ | 7.190 | | | $ | 7.340 | | | $ | 7.730 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.209 | | | $ | 0.243 | | | $ | 0.247 | | | $ | 0.217 | | | $ | 0.157 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.515 | | | | 0.020 | | | | 0.053 | | | | 0.021 | | | | (0.085 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 0.724 | | | $ | 0.263 | | | $ | 0.300 | | | $ | 0.238 | | | $ | 0.072 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.278 | ) | | $ | (0.313 | ) | | $ | (0.338 | ) | | $ | (0.369 | ) | | $ | (0.459 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | (0.016 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.002 | ) | | | (0.019 | ) | | | (0.003 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.294 | ) | | $ | (0.313 | ) | | $ | (0.340 | ) | | $ | (0.388 | ) | | $ | (0.462 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 7.530 | | | $ | 7.100 | | | $ | 7.150 | | | $ | 7.190 | | | $ | 7.340 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 10.31 | % | | | 3.67 | % | | | 4.27 | % | | | 3.36 | % | | | 1.16 | %(3) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 259,975 | | | $ | 171,302 | | | $ | 115,460 | | | $ | 129,963 | | | $ | 182,214 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.91 | % | | | 1.94 | % | | | 1.97 | % | | | 1.95 | % | | | 1.93 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.80 | % | | | 3.35 | % | | | 3.45 | % | | | 2.95 | % | | | 2.08 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 28 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 30 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.11% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.510 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.133 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | | 0.111 | | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 0.244 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.202 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | (0.012 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.214 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 7.540 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 3.29 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 14,879 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 0.91 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.06 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 28 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the commencement of operations, April 3, 2009, to October 31, 2009. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
|
(8) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class R |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | October 31, 2005(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.090 | | | $ | 7.130 | | | $ | 7.170 | | | $ | 7.320 | | | $ | 7.430 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.239 | | | $ | 0.276 | | | $ | 0.280 | | | $ | 0.214 | | | $ | 0.083 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.510 | | | | 0.032 | | | | 0.054 | | | | 0.060 | | | | (0.091 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.749 | | | $ | 0.308 | | | $ | 0.334 | | | $ | 0.274 | | | $ | (0.008 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.311 | ) | | $ | (0.348 | ) | | $ | (0.372 | ) | | $ | (0.405 | ) | | $ | (0.099 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | (0.018 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.002 | ) | | | (0.019 | ) | | | (0.003 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.329 | ) | | $ | (0.348 | ) | | $ | (0.374 | ) | | $ | (0.424 | ) | | $ | (0.102 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 7.510 | | | $ | 7.090 | | | $ | 7.130 | | | $ | 7.170 | | | $ | 7.320 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 10.70 | % | | | 4.33 | % | | | 4.79 | % | | | 3.87 | % | | | (0.12 | )%(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 5,065 | | | $ | 827 | | | $ | 245 | | | $ | 235 | | | $ | 2 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 1.41 | % | | | 1.44 | % | | | 1.47 | % | | | 1.45 | % | | | 1.43 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.20 | % | | | 3.82 | % | | | 3.93 | % | | | 3.01 | % | | | 4.57 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 28 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 30 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the commencement of operations, August 12, 2005, to October 31, 2005. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers five classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I and Class R shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Government Obligations Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (91.8% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio and other income, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $211,464,012 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2010 ($16,943,251), October 31, 2011 ($78,339,789), October 31, 2012 ($67,101,638), October 31, 2013 ($23,607,593), October 31, 2014 ($17,522,954), October 31, 2015 ($6,336,492) and October 31, 2016 ($1,612,295).
During the year ended October 31, 2009, a capital loss carryforward of $4,113,544 was utilized to offset net realized gains by the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
12
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund declares dividends daily to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are generally paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any) are made at least annually. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 32,697,314 | | | $ | 28,472,753 | | | |
Tax return of capital | | | 1,869,104 | | | | — | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was increased by $6,617,846 and accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income was decreased by $6,617,846 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for paydown gain (loss) and premium amortization. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | | $(211,464,012) | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | $ 29,816,431 | | | |
Other temporary differences | | | $ (930,236) | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, partnership allocations, futures contracts, the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders, premium amortization and mixed straddle amounts.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
Eaton Vance Management (EVM) serves as the administrator to the Fund, but receives no compensation. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $37,757 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $124,827 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B, Class C and Class R shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the
13
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $1,073,100 for Class A shares. The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan), Class C shares (Class C Plan) and Class R shares (Class R Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 5% and 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, respectively, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $1,054,966 and $1,656,073 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $13,286,000 and $78,314,000, respectively. The Class R Plan requires the Fund to pay EVD an amount equal to 0.50% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class R shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Trustees of the Trust have currently limited Class R distribution payments to 0.25% per annum of the average daily net assets attributable to Class R shares. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $6,342, representing 0.25% of the average daily net assets of Class R shares.
The Class B, Class C and Class R Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $351,656, $552,024 and $6,341 for Class B, Class C and Class R shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $39,000, $199,000 and $76,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $356,370,975 and $242,715,620, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
14
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 35,310,715 | | | | 29,072,836 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,909,187 | | | | 1,422,163 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (27,184,797 | ) | | | (15,178,819 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 1,650,302 | | | | 1,297,703 | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 11,685,407 | | | | 16,613,883 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 3,114,542 | | | | 4,727,227 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 456,842 | | | | 550,405 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (5,858,706 | ) | | | (5,966,564 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (1,648,851 | ) | | | (1,296,262 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (3,936,173 | ) | | | (1,985,194 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 19,716,342 | | | | 14,578,230 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 686,681 | | | | 500,225 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (9,984,512 | ) | | | (7,113,646 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 10,418,511 | | | | 7,964,809 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Period Ended
| | | | | | |
Class I | | October 31, 2009(1) | | | | | | |
|
Sales | | | 2,057,379 | | | | | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 17,339 | | | | | | | |
Redemptions | | | (100,550 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 1,974,168 | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class R | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 868,623 | | | | 115,915 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 14,013 | | | | 2,680 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (324,906 | ) | | | (36,200 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 557,730 | | | | 82,395 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class I commenced operations on April 3, 2009. |
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 21, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
15
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual
Funds Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance
Government Obligations Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The financial highlights for the year ended October 31, 2006, and all prior periods presented, were audited by other auditors. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial highlights in their report dated December 27, 2006.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 21, 2009
16
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund.
17
Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage Pass-Throughs — 88.3% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | | | | | | | | | |
3.003%, with maturity at 2035(1) | | $ | 15,081 | | | $ | 15,575,532 | | | |
3.183%, with maturity at 2034(1) | | | 3,199 | | | | 3,324,515 | | | |
5.00%, with maturity at 2014 | | | 1,637 | | | | 1,731,209 | | | |
5.50%, with various maturities to 2032 | | | 10,231 | | | | 10,897,125 | | | |
6.00%, with various maturities to 2035 | | | 23,508 | | | | 25,240,847 | | | |
6.50%, with various maturities to 2030 | | | 32,836 | | | | 35,722,900 | | | |
6.87%, with maturity at 2024 | | | 289 | | | | 320,147 | | | |
7.00%, with various maturities to 2035 | | | 33,072 | | | | 36,146,712 | | | |
7.09%, with maturity at 2023 | | | 1,115 | | | | 1,243,973 | | | |
7.25%, with maturity at 2022 | | | 1,730 | | | | 1,937,643 | | | |
7.31%, with maturity at 2027 | | | 485 | | | | 547,649 | | | |
7.50%, with various maturities to 2035 | | | 29,732 | | | | 33,415,448 | | | |
7.63%, with maturity at 2019 | | | 587 | | | | 644,533 | | | |
7.75%, with maturity at 2018 | | | 41 | | | | 45,425 | | | |
7.78%, with maturity at 2022 | | | 200 | | | | 226,474 | | | |
7.85%, with maturity at 2020 | | | 504 | | | | 567,546 | | | |
8.00%, with various maturities to 2028 | | | 16,253 | | | | 18,363,033 | | | |
8.13%, with maturity at 2019 | | | 1,049 | | | | 1,185,036 | | | |
8.15%, with various maturities to 2021 | | | 351 | | | | 402,842 | | | |
8.25%, with maturity at 2017 | | | 132 | | | | 149,254 | | | |
8.50%, with various maturities to 2031 | | | 9,272 | | | | 10,673,956 | | | |
8.75%, with maturity at 2016 | | | 16 | | | | 17,291 | | | |
9.00%, with various maturities to 2027 | | | 10,879 | | | | 12,448,001 | | | |
9.25%, with various maturities to 2017 | | | 126 | | | | 137,498 | | | |
9.50%, with various maturities to 2026 | | | 3,184 | | | | 3,721,728 | | | |
9.75%, with maturity at 2018 | | | 4 | | | | 3,948 | | | |
10.50%, with maturity at 2020 | | | 975 | | | | 1,131,904 | | | |
11.00%, with maturity at 2015 | | | 32 | | | | 36,547 | | | |
13.50%, with maturity at 2010 | | | 2 | | | | 1,656 | | | |
15.00%, with maturity at 2011 | | | 0 | (2) | | | 295 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 215,860,667 | | | |
|
|
|
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | |
2.662%, with maturity at 2026(1) | | $ | 1,552 | | | $ | 1,591,924 | | | |
2.666%, with maturity at 2022(1) | | | 2,565 | | | | 2,622,145 | | | |
2.723%, with various maturities to 2035(1) | | | 38,531 | | | | 39,529,161 | | | |
2.736%, with maturity at 2022(1) | | | 2,781 | | | | 2,839,514 | | | |
2.763%, with maturity at 2031(1) | | | 4,705 | | | | 4,809,693 | | | |
2.787%, with maturity at 2035(1) | | | 2,424 | | | | 2,487,271 | | | |
2.849%, with various maturities to 2033(1) | | | 5,333 | | | | 5,471,053 | | | |
3.027%, with maturity at 2037(1) | | | 7,756 | | | | 8,025,514 | | | |
3.178%, with maturity at 2036(1) | | | 2,629 | | | | 2,693,570 | | | |
3.622%, with maturity at 2036(1) | | | 3,256 | | | | 3,332,323 | | | |
3.691%, with maturity at 2034(1) | | | 9,808 | | | | 10,206,885 | | | |
3.828%, with maturity at 2035(1) | | | 12,362 | | | | 12,863,914 | | | |
3.925%, with maturity at 2021(1) | | | 2,606 | | | | 2,684,389 | | | |
3.929%, with maturity at 2036(1) | | | 965 | | | | 994,487 | | | |
3.933%, with maturity at 2034(1) | | | 9,447 | | | | 9,830,811 | | | |
4.00%, with maturity at 2014 | | | 673 | | | | 691,547 | | | |
4.418%, with maturity at 2036(1) | | | 39,468 | | | | 41,070,908 | | | |
4.492%, with maturity at 2040(1) | | | 2,627 | | | | 2,738,639 | | | |
4.50%, with various maturities to 2018 | | | 60,319 | | | | 63,330,776 | | | |
4.557%, with maturity at 2035(1) | | | 13,372 | | | | 13,915,140 | | | |
4.897%, with maturity at 2034(1) | | | 37,621 | | | | 39,149,603 | | | |
5.00%, with various maturities to 2027 | | | 5,584 | | | | 5,837,637 | | | |
5.50%, with various maturities to 2030 | | | 29,602 | | | | 31,708,661 | | | |
6.00%, with various maturities to 2032 | | | 24,320 | | | | 26,030,323 | | | |
6.50%, with various maturities to 2033 | | | 69,761 | | | | 76,066,710 | | | |
6.518%, with maturity at 2025(3) | | | 448 | | | | 492,233 | | | |
7.00%, with various maturities to 2033 | | | 52,122 | | | | 57,324,235 | | | |
7.25%, with maturity at 2023 | | | 45 | | | | 49,279 | | | |
7.50%, with various maturities to 2029 | | | 12,549 | | | | 14,027,162 | | | |
7.858%, with maturity at 2030(3) | | | 47 | | | | 53,791 | | | |
7.875%, with maturity at 2021 | | | 1,056 | | | | 1,202,331 | | | |
8.00%, with various maturities to 2032 | | | 18,684 | | | | 21,348,246 | | | |
8.25%, with maturity at 2025 | | | 442 | | | | 505,913 | | | |
8.33%, with maturity at 2020 | | | 1,044 | | | | 1,198,933 | | | |
8.50%, with various maturities to 2032 | | | 12,277 | | | | 14,188,405 | | | |
8.536%, with maturity at 2021(3) | | | 131 | | | | 151,662 | | | |
8.75%, with maturity at 2016 | | | 1 | | | | 737 | | | |
9.00%, with maturity at 2010(3) | | | 6 | | | | 6,112 | | | |
9.00%, with various maturities to 2030 | | | 1,627 | | | | 1,881,991 | | | |
9.125%, with maturity at 2011 | | | 2 | | | | 2,191 | | | |
9.25%, with maturity at 2016 | | | 1 | | | | 893 | | | |
9.50%, with various maturities to 2030 | | | 3,111 | | | | 3,634,654 | | | |
9.585%, with maturity at 2025(3) | | | 56 | | | | 63,332 | | | |
9.75%, with maturity at 2019 | | | 33 | | | | 39,850 | | | |
9.963%, with maturity at 2021(3) | | | 88 | | | | 104,722 | | | |
10.00%, with maturity at 2012 | | | 13 | | | | 13,609 | | | |
10.017%, with maturity at 2023(3) | | | 114 | | | | 132,061 | | | |
10.092%, with maturity at 2020(3) | | | 107 | | | | 121,406 | | | |
10.10%, with maturity at 2021(3) | | | 67 | | | | 77,364 | | | |
10.109%, with maturity at 2021(3) | | | 145 | | | | 165,824 | | | |
10.575%, with maturity at 2025(3) | | | 65 | | | | 73,492 | | | |
11.00%, with maturity at 2010 | | | 0 | (2) | | | 296 | | | |
11.374%, with maturity at 2019(3) | | | 125 | | | | 140,590 | | | |
11.50%, with maturity at 2012 | | | 11 | | | | 11,939 | | | |
11.554%, with maturity at 2025(3) | | | 35 | | | | 40,179 | | | |
11.697%, with maturity at 2018(3) | | | 146 | | | | 164,456 | | | |
12.43%, with maturity at 2021(3) | | | 55 | | | | 60,913 | | | |
See notes to financial statements18
Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Federal National Mortgage Association: (continued) |
12.687%, with maturity at 2015(3) | | $ | 132 | | | $ | 151,636 | | | |
13.00%, with maturity at 2010 | | | 2 | | | | 1,611 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 527,954,646 | | | |
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | |
4.125%, with various maturities to 2027(1) | | $ | 824 | | | $ | 851,487 | | | |
6.50%, with maturity at 2024 | | | 78 | | | | 84,414 | | | |
7.00%, with various maturities to 2034 | | | 47,458 | | | | 52,832,269 | | | |
7.25%, with maturity at 2022 | | | 38 | | | | 42,431 | | | |
7.50%, with various maturities to 2025 | | | 8,192 | | | | 9,186,896 | | | |
8.00%, with various maturities to 2027 | | | 15,288 | | | | 17,388,988 | | | |
8.25%, with maturity at 2019 | | | 194 | | | | 220,689 | | | |
8.30%, with maturity at 2020 | | | 52 | | | | 59,971 | | | |
8.50%, with various maturities to 2018 | | | 2,591 | | | | 2,928,302 | | | |
9.00%, with various maturities to 2027 | | | 8,875 | | | | 10,573,137 | | | |
9.50%, with various maturities to 2026 | | | 5,897 | | | | 7,057,326 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 101,225,910 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Mortgage Pass-Throughs | | |
(identified cost $811,271,616) | | $ | 845,041,223 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations — 7.2% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | | | | | | | | | |
Series 30, Class I, 7.50%, 4/25/24 | | $ | 343 | | | $ | 366,515 | | | |
Series 1822, Class Z, 6.90%, 3/15/26 | | | 2,127 | | | | 2,255,282 | | | |
Series 1829, Class ZB, 6.50%, 3/15/26 | | | 1,001 | | | | 1,084,262 | | | |
Series 1896, Class Z, 6.00%, 9/15/26 | | | 1,118 | | | | 1,168,365 | | | |
Series 2075, Class PH, 6.50%, 8/15/28 | | | 552 | | | | 596,861 | | | |
Series 2091, Class ZC, 6.00%, 11/15/28 | | | 2,435 | | | | 2,630,387 | | | |
Series 2102, Class Z, 6.00%, 12/15/28 | | | 630 | | | | 680,247 | | | |
Series 2115, Class K, 6.00%, 1/15/29 | | | 3,297 | | | | 3,485,164 | | | |
Series 2142, Class Z, 6.50%, 4/15/29 | | | 1,206 | | | | 1,309,322 | | | |
Series 2245, Class A, 8.00%, 8/15/27 | | | 12,777 | | | | 14,239,984 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 27,816,389 | | | |
|
|
|
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | |
Series G-8, Class E, 9.00%, 4/25/21 | | $ | 461 | | | $ | 530,635 | | | |
Series G92-44, Class ZQ, 8.00%, 7/25/22 | | | 536 | | | | 595,033 | | | |
Series G93-36, Class ZQ, 6.50%, 12/25/23 | | | 17,539 | | | | 19,009,078 | | | |
Series 1993-16, Class Z, 7.50%, 2/25/23 | | | 648 | | | | 727,462 | | | |
Series 1993-39, Class Z, 7.50%, 4/25/23 | | | 1,565 | | | | 1,754,773 | | | |
Series 1993-149, Class M, 7.00%, 8/25/23 | | | 799 | | | | 890,965 | | | |
Series 1993-178, Class PK, 6.50%, 9/25/23 | | | 1,589 | | | | 1,741,547 | | | |
Series 1993-250, Class Z, 7.00%, 12/25/23 | | | 429 | | | | 466,166 | | | |
Series 1994-42, Class K, 6.50%, 4/25/24 | | | 7,189 | | | | 7,906,436 | | | |
Series 1994-82, Class Z, 8.00%, 5/25/24 | | | 2,609 | | | | 2,970,085 | | | |
Series 1997-81, Class PD, 6.35%, 12/18/27 | | | 995 | | | | 1,091,131 | | | |
Series 2000-49, Class A, 8.00%, 3/18/27 | | | 1,356 | | | | 1,559,473 | | | |
Series 2002-1, Class G, 7.00%, 7/25/23 | | | 1,027 | | | | 1,144,212 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 40,386,996 | | | |
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | |
Series 1998-19, Class ZB, 6.50%, 7/20/28 | | $ | 842 | | | $ | 924,149 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | | |
(identified cost $65,622,060) | | $ | 69,127,534 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government Agency Obligations — 5.3% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
United States Agency for International Development- Israel, 0.00% with various maturities to 2020 | | $ | 31,782 | | | $ | 22,783,796 | | | |
United States Agency for International Development- Israel, 5.50%, 9/18/23 | | | 25,000 | | | | 27,894,850 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total U.S. Government Agency Obligations | | |
(identified cost $50,212,120) | | $ | 50,678,646 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury Obligations — 0.8% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bond, 7.125%, 2/15/23(4) | | $ | 6,000 | | | $ | 7,984,692 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total U.S. Treasury Obligations | | |
(identified cost $6,224,355) | | $ | 7,984,692 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 101.6% | | |
(identified cost $933,330,151) | | $ | 972,832,095 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (1.6)% | | $ | (15,550,712 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 957,281,383 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements19
Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
| | |
(1) | | Adjustable rate mortgage. |
|
(2) | | Principal amount is less than $1,000. |
|
(3) | | Weighted average fixed-rate coupon that changes/updates monthly. |
|
(4) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
See notes to financial statements20
Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investments, at value (identified cost, $933,330,151) | | $ | 972,832,095 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 4,530,242 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 392,543 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 977,754,880 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Demand note payable | | $ | 2,600,000 | | | |
Payable for investments purchased | | | 16,936,110 | | | |
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 117,519 | | | |
Due to custodian | | | 85,203 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 563,913 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 3,203 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 167,549 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 20,473,497 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 957,281,383 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 917,864,719 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 39,416,664 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 957,281,383 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 43,085,630 | | | |
Interest allocated from affiliated investment | | | 134,320 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (96,823 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 43,123,127 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 6,485,293 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 40,395 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 288,231 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 74,450 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 36,763 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 6,925,132 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 11 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 11 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 6,925,121 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 36,198,006 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | 3,404,197 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 8,714,930 | | | |
|
|
Net realized gain | | $ | 12,119,127 | | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 44,951,129 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 2,244,215 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 47,195,344 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 59,314,471 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 95,512,477 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements21
Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 36,198,006 | | | $ | 34,218,814 | | | |
Net realized gain from investment transactions and financial futures contracts | | | 12,119,127 | | | | 8,945,747 | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and financial futures contracts | | | 47,195,344 | | | | (10,368,684 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 95,512,477 | | | $ | 32,795,877 | | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 397,742,451 | | | $ | 388,827,835 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (346,600,808 | ) | | | (298,743,400 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | 51,141,643 | | | $ | 90,084,435 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 146,654,120 | | | $ | 122,880,312 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 810,627,263 | | | $ | 687,746,951 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 957,281,383 | | | $ | 810,627,263 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements22
Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1) | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.80 | % | | | 0.80 | % | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.77 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.97 | % | | | 4.48 | % | | | 4.60 | % | | | 4.09 | % | | | 3.21 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 28 | % | | | 19 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 2 | % | | | 30 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 11.54 | % | | | 4.85 | % | | | 5.49 | % | | | 4.71 | % | | | 2.46 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 957,281 | | | $ | 810,627 | | | $ | 687,747 | | | $ | 727,804 | | | $ | 866,273 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements23
Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Government Obligations Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to provide a high current return. The Portfolio invests primarily in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) issued, backed or otherwise guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies or instrumentalities. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, the Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund, Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund and Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund held an interest of 91.8%, 2.5% and 3.3%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Debt obligations, (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days and excluding most seasoned mortgage-backed securities), will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Most seasoned, fixed rate 30-year mortgage-backed securities are valued through the use of the investment adviser’s matrix pricing system, which takes into account bond prices, yield differentials, anticipated prepayments and interest rates provided by dealers. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Financial futures contracts are valued at the settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities in the same manner as debt obligations described above.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s
24
Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
H Financial Futures Contracts — The Portfolio may enter into financial futures contracts. The Portfolio’s investment in financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against changes in interest rates or as a substitute for the purchase of securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the Portfolio is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Portfolio each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Portfolio. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Portfolio may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. In entering such contracts, the Portfolio bears the risk if the counterparties do not perform under the contracts’ terms. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement and subsequent fee reduction agreement between the Portfolio and BMR, the fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.75% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million, 0.6875% from $500 million up to $1 billion, 0.6250% from $1 billion up to $1.5 billion, 0.5625% from $1.5 billion up to $2 billion, 0.5000% from $2 billion up to $2.5 billion and 0.4375% annually of average daily net assets of $2.5 billion or more, and is payable monthly. The fee reduction cannot be terminated without the consent of the Trustees and shareholders. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $6,576,959 of which $91,666 was allocated from Cash Management and $6,485,293 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.72% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
25
Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of U.S. Government and agency obligations, other than short-term obligations and including maturities and paydowns, aggregated $307,039,599 and $255,591,773, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 942,450,015 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 30,483,928 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (101,848 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 30,382,080 | | | |
|
|
5 Financial Instruments
The Portfolio may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include financial futures contracts, and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment a Portfolio has in particular classes of financial instruments and does not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at October 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
Expiration
| | | | | | Aggregate
| | | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Date | | Contracts | | Position | | Cost | | | Value | | | Depreciation | | | |
|
12/09 | | 80 30 Year U.S. Treasury Bond | | Short | | $ | (9,527,220 | ) | | $ | (9,612,500 | ) | | $ | (85,280 | ) | | |
|
|
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815-10), effective May 1, 2009. Such standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. The disclosure below includes additional information as a result of implementing FAS 161.
The Portfolio is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Portfolio holds fixed rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. The Portfolio may purchase and sell U.S. Treasury futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk at October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value |
| | |
Derivative | | Asset Derivative | | | Liability Derivative | | | |
|
Futures contracts | | $ | — | | | $ | (85,280 | )(1) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Amount represents cumulative unrealized depreciation on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk for the six months ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Change in
| | | |
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | Realized Gain
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
| | (Loss) on
| | | (Depreciation) on
| | | |
| | Derivatives
| | | Derivatives
| | | |
| | Recognized in
| | | Recognized in
| | | |
Derivative | | Income(1) | | | Income(2) | | | |
|
Futures contracts | | $ | (139,808 | ) | | $ | 16,954 | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Financial futures contracts. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Financial futures contracts. |
The average notional amount of futures contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009, which is indicative of the volume of this derivative type, was approximately $81,857,000.
26
Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
6 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had a balance outstanding pursuant to this line of credit of $2,600,000 at an interest rate of 1.36%. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
7 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Mortgage Pass-Throughs | | $ | — | | | $ | 845,041,223 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 845,041,223 | | | |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | | | — | | | | 69,127,534 | | | | — | | | | 69,127,534 | | | |
U.S. Government Agency Obligations | | | — | | | | 50,678,646 | | | | — | | | | 50,678,646 | | | |
U.S. Treasury Obligations | | | | | | | 7,984,692 | | | | — | | | | 7,984,692 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | 972,832,095 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 972,832,095 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | (85,280 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (85,280 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | (85,280 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (85,280 | ) | | |
|
|
The Portfolio held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 21, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
27
Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Government Obligations Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Government Obligations Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits. The supplementary data for the year ended October 31, 2006, and all prior periods presented, were audited by other auditors. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on that supplementary data in their report dated December 27, 2006.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Government Obligations Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 21, 2009
28
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
29
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Government Obligations Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), the portfolio in which Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund (the “Fund”) invests, with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including the fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio. The Board specifically noted the Adviser’s experience in investing in mortgage-backed securities, including seasoned mortgage-backed securities. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the
30
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the Fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and the Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund, the Portfolio and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
31
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Government Obligations Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
32
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Since 1998 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President | | Vice President of the Trust since 2007 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President | | Vice President of the Trust since 2002 and of the Portfolio since 1993 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
33
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Vice President of the Trust since 2007 and President of the Portfolio since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
34
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Government Obligations Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Administrator of Eaton Vance Government Obligations FundEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective, risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
• | | The capital markets were defined by two distinct periods during the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009: one that exhibited extreme weakness – especially during the closing months of 2008 – and the other, which showed increasingly more-robust activity in response to massive government interventions that were undertaken to help restore liquidity to the credit markets and re-stimulate global economic growth. Furthermore, toward the end of the first calendar quarter, as signs of improving economic fundamentals began to emerge, the markets’ disdain for asset classes with any trace of risk abruptly reversed course, investor appetite for risk returned, and the capital markets staged a dramatic comeback. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12e66/12e665ef38b7d02fbba604fb598385d13a171004" alt="(PHOTO OF MICHAEL W. WEILHEIMER)"
Michael W. Weilheimer, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abc05/abc05dfadc0f7d5740e6df78553ff7beea73c446" alt="(PHOTO OF THOMAS P. HUGGINS)"
Thomas P. Huggins
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | In the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers collapse in late 2008, credit markets came to a virtual standstill and global economic activity ground to a snail’s pace. High-yield bond prices bore little correlation with market fundamentals: Data used to monitor creditworthiness suggested that overall credit quality appeared to be in line with previous downturns, yet high-yield bonds and bank loans traded far below levels consistent with normal default and recovery expectations, reflecting a broad-scale breakdown of the credit markets. The selling pressure during this period was such that liquidity was sharply lower for higher-quality bonds and virtually evaporated for those lower on the quality spectrum. By mid-December 2008, high-yield spreads had eclipsed 2,000 basis points, or 20% above Treasury yields – an unheard-of level, and high-yield bond prices fell precipitously. |
|
• | | By the end of the first quarter of 2009, however, with a gathering tail wind, high-yield bonds came roaring back. As of April 30, 2009, spreads had narrowed to around 1,300 basis points (13%) and, accordingly, bond prices moved sharply higher. Much of the impetus for this abrupt rebound seemed to turn on early signs of economic improvement and on investor optimism about the potential success of the federal government’s fiscal and monetary stimulus programs. Flows into high-yield mutual funds began to swell, and this surge in buying activity served to push bond prices even higher. By the start of the fourth quarter of 2009, high-yield spreads had become tighter still, finishing at around 760 basis points (7.6%) as of October 31, 2009. |
|
• | | The high-yield market benefited from this narrowing of yield spreads and from the public’s more rosy view of the prospects for a rebound from the markets’ upheavals in 2008. Within the high-yield universe, more highly rated bonds outperformed those of lower credit quality during the early part of the past 12 months, and shorter-maturity issues outpaced those with longer maturities. Beginning in early 2009, however, the opposite held true, with B and CCC rated bonds achieving the best price appreciation. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month-end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
• | | The Fund1 posted double-digit total returns for the 12 months ending October 31, 2009, its Class A, Class B and Class C shares outpacing the return of its peer group, the Lipper High Current Yield Funds |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08 – 10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A2 | | | 37.83 | % |
Class B2 | | | 37.31 | |
Class C2 | | | 36.97 | |
Class I2 | | | 1.92 | * |
BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index3 | | | 48.79 | |
BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Constrained Index3 | | | 49.54 | |
Lipper High Current Yield Funds Average3 | | | 35.59 | |
| | |
* | | Performance is cumulative since share class inception on 10/1/09. |
See page 3 for more performance information.
| | |
1 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, High Income Opportunities Portfolio, with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
2 | | These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for the Fund’s Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B shares and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset vale (NAV). Class A and Class I shares are subject to a 1% redemption fee if redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of the settlement of the purchase. |
|
3 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or Lipper Classification. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. The Lipper average is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
1
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
| | Classification1. However, both the Fund and the Lipper peer group underperformed the return of the benchmark BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index (the Index), mainly because of a large inflow of domestic and foreign financials into the Index at the low point in the market, and these securities outperformed as the market rallied. |
|
• | | The Fund underperformed the Index largely on the basis of an overweighting in B rated bonds, which did poorly in the early part of the period. It also undershot the Index due to its sizable underweighting in financials, many of which were added to the Index at low valuations and subsequently performed well during the market rally. Conversely, the Fund benefited from a significant overweighting in strong-performing CCC bonds during the market rally occurring later in the period. |
|
• | | Throughout the fiscal year, the investment adviser positioned the Fund in investments it thought could present rewarding capital appreciation opportunities. The overall strategy of maintaining a greater-than-index weighting in B rated bonds of solid companies worked to the Fund’s benefit in absolute terms during calendar year 2009, as this class of bonds performed well during the market’s rally. In the first quarter of 2009, as signs emerged that the credit markets were beginning to thaw, the Fund opportunistically reduced its cash position by investing in some higher-quality, investment-grade securities, as well as in deeply discounted bank debt. It also purchased newly issued securities and added to existing positions, both at extremely attractive yields. |
|
• | | Despite its solid gains, the Fund lagged the Index due to security selection and an overweighting in the high-yield debt of gaming companies, which struggled, especially during the first half of the fiscal year. Also detracting from relative results were conservative allocations to various financial services industries – including banks and thrifts, insurance and diversified financials – as well as underexposure to automotive and auto parts, all of which put up strong returns during the period. While the Fund’s absolute performance benefited from its investments in these strong performing groups, maintaining underweighted allocations to these industries took a toll in relative terms. |
• | | On the upside, as mentioned earlier, the Fund offset some of its index-lagging performance through a sizable overweighting in CCC bonds. The Fund’s performance versus the Index also benefited from strong security selection within the telecommunications and cable/satellite television industries. An overweighting and favorable security selection in the resurgent super retail group also aided relative returns, as did an underweighting and security selection in the utilities segment, which underperformed the market. |
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper average is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
Portfolio Composition
Portfolio Credit Quality Ratings3
By total investments
| | |
3 | | As a percentage of the Portfolio’s total investments as of 10/31/09. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
2
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class B of the Fund with that of the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index, an unmanaged index of below investment grade U.S. dollar-denominated corporate bonds publicly issued in the U.S. domestic market and the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Constrained Index, whose constituents are capitalization-weighted, based on their current amount outstanding, provided the total allocation to an individual issuer does not exceed 2%. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class B of the Fund, the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Index and the BofA Merrill Lynch U.S. High Yield Constrained Index. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | | Class B | | | Class C | | | Class I | |
Class Share Symbol | | ETHIX | | | EVHIX | | | ECHIX | | | EIHIX | |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 37.83 | % | | | 37.31 | % | | | 36.97 | % | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 4.02 | | | | 3.33 | | | | 3.27 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | N.A. | | | | 3.50 | | | | 3.46 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.49 | | | | 6.56 | | | | 5.31 | | | | 1.92 | %†† |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | |
One Year | | | 31.10 | % | | | 32.31 | % | | | 35.97 | % | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 3.01 | | | | 3.06 | | | | 3.27 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | N.A. | | | | 3.50 | | | | 3.46 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.59 | | | | 6.56 | | | | 5.31 | | | | 1.92 | %†† |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates – Class A: 3/11/04; Class B: 8/19/86; Class C: 6/8/94; Class I: 10/1/09 |
|
†† | | Returns are cumulative since inception of the share class. |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B or Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at NAV. SEC Average Annual Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Returns for Class B reflect applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class A and Class I shares are subject to a 1% redemption fee if redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of the settlement of the purchase. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | | Class B | | | Class C | | | Class I | |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.11 | % | | | 1.86 | % | | | 1.86 | % | | | 0.86 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09, as supplemented 9/30/09. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8325b/8325b95886da6b04a48fd1183094f6ace1579d9a" alt="(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)"
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class B of the Fund commenced operations on 8/19/86. A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class A shares on 3/11/04 (commencement of operations), Class C shares on 10/31/99 and Class I shares on 10/1/09 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $12,812 ($12,203 at the maximum offering price), $14,060 and $10,192, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. |
3
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,319.70 | | | | $7.07 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,318.40 | | | | $11.34 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,315.20 | | | | $11.44 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.20 | | | | $0.87 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.10 | | | | $6.16 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.40 | | | | $9.86 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.30 | | | | $9.96 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.10 | | | | $5.19 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Class I had not commenced operations as of May 1, 2009. Actual expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.21% for Class A shares, 1.94% for Class B shares, 1.96% for Class C shares and 1.02% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 for Class A, Class B and Class C (to reflect the one-half year period) and by 31/365 for Class I (to reflect the period from commencement of operations on October 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009 (September 30, 2009 for Class I). The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
|
| ** | Hypothetical expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.21% for Class A shares, 1.94% for Class B shares, 1.96% for Class C shares and 1.02% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009 (September 30, 2009 for Class I). The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
4
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in High Income Opportunities Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $486,353,201) | | $ | 430,248,848 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 1,246,958 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 431,495,806 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 1,620,875 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 1,734,153 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 209,714 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 41 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 175,554 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 3,740,337 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 427,755,469 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 705,783,609 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (223,679,470 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 1,755,683 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation from Portfolio | | | (56,104,353 | ) | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 427,755,469 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 238,484,549 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 59,289,667 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 4.02 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 4.22 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 72,245,278 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 17,941,914 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 4.03 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 115,926,762 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 28,813,203 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 4.02 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 1,098,880 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 273,186 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 4.02 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest and other income allocated from Portfolio | | $ | 41,610,153 | | | |
Dividends allocated from Portfolio | | | 209,264 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (2,715,928 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 39,103,489 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 446,862 | | | |
Class B | | | 705,462 | | | |
Class C | | | 903,724 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 47,477 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 481,793 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 22,841 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 129,914 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 68,629 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 14,405 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 2,821,607 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 36,281,882 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (27,501,209 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (12,977,643 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contact transactions | | | 46,552 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (40,432,300 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 113,387,843 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | 6,014,876 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (23,087 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 119,379,632 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 78,947,332 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 115,229,214 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 36,281,882 | | | $ | 45,154,591 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (40,432,300 | ) | | | (29,819,298 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, swap contracts, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 119,379,632 | | | | (170,140,182 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 115,229,214 | | | $ | (154,804,889 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (22,412,054 | ) | | $ | (20,114,244 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (8,376,210 | ) | | | (13,439,771 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (10,551,470 | ) | | | (11,100,265 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (1,792 | ) | | | — | | | |
Tax return of capital | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | (21,935 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (14,656 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (12,105 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (41,341,526 | ) | | $ | (44,702,976 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 40,132,945 | | | $ | 28,348,051 | | | |
Class B | | | 6,970,738 | | | | 6,914,420 | | | |
Class C | | | 21,041,959 | | | | 14,908,093 | | | |
Class I | | | 1,103,280 | | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 11,044,259 | | | | 9,264,184 | | | |
Class B | | | 3,712,709 | | | | 5,751,882 | | | |
Class C | | | 4,530,679 | | | | 4,448,493 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (40,175,465 | ) | | | (80,617,635 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (16,091,036 | ) | | | (47,281,467 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (19,333,637 | ) | | | (39,404,168 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 23,528,815 | | | | 39,044,718 | | | |
Class B | | | (23,528,815 | ) | | | (39,044,718 | ) | | |
Redemption fees | | | 7,236 | | | | 3,495 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 12,943,667 | | | $ | (97,664,652 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 86,831,355 | | | $ | (297,172,517 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 340,924,114 | | | $ | 638,096,631 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 427,755,469 | | | $ | 340,924,114 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 1,755,683 | | | $ | 3,799,655 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 3.310 | | | $ | 5.130 | | | $ | 5.230 | | | $ | 5.100 | | | $ | 5.210 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.365 | | | $ | 0.419 | | | $ | 0.418 | | | $ | 0.401 | | | $ | 0.402 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.763 | | | | (1.823 | ) | | | (0.105 | ) | | | 0.142 | | | | (0.095 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.128 | | | $ | (1.404 | ) | | $ | 0.313 | | | $ | 0.543 | | | $ | 0.307 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.418 | ) | | $ | (0.416 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.417 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.000 | )(2) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.418 | ) | | $ | (0.416 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.417 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 4.020 | | | $ | 3.310 | | | $ | 5.130 | | | $ | 5.230 | | | $ | 5.100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 37.83 | % | | | (29.26 | )% | | | 6.11 | % | | | 11.04 | % | | | 6.01 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 238,485 | | | $ | 161,603 | | | $ | 254,508 | | | $ | 199,812 | | | $ | 165,125 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.27 | % | | | 1.11 | % | | | 1.04 | % | | | 0.97 | % | | | 0.97 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 10.93 | % | | | 9.06 | % | | | 7.98 | % | | | 7.77 | % | | | 7.70 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 72 | % | | | 48 | % | | | 81 | % | | | 62 | % | | | 62 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 3.300 | | | $ | 5.120 | | | $ | 5.220 | | | $ | 5.080 | | | $ | 5.200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.345 | | | $ | 0.383 | | | $ | 0.379 | | | $ | 0.363 | | | $ | 0.363 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.773 | | | | (1.826 | ) | | | (0.107 | ) | | | 0.149 | | | | (0.106 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.118 | | | $ | (1.443 | ) | | $ | 0.272 | | | $ | 0.512 | | | $ | 0.257 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.388 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.372 | ) | | $ | (0.372 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.000 | )(2) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.388 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.372 | ) | | $ | (0.372 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 4.030 | | | $ | 3.300 | | | $ | 5.120 | | | $ | 5.220 | | | $ | 5.080 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 37.31 | % | | | (29.93 | )% | | | 5.30 | % | | | 10.41 | % | | | 5.34 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 72,245 | | | $ | 89,480 | | | $ | 221,436 | | | $ | 305,519 | | | $ | 370,036 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 2.02 | % | | | 1.86 | % | | | 1.78 | % | | | 1.72 | % | | | 1.72 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 10.56 | % | | | 8.23 | % | | | 7.23 | % | | | 7.05 | % | | | 6.95 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 72 | % | | | 48 | % | | | 81 | % | | | 62 | % | | | 62 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.33% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 3.300 | | | $ | 5.110 | | | $ | 5.220 | | | $ | 5.080 | | | $ | 5.200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.341 | | | $ | 0.383 | | | $ | 0.378 | | | $ | 0.363 | | | $ | 0.363 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.767 | | | | (1.816 | ) | | | (0.116 | ) | | | 0.149 | | | | (0.107 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.108 | | | $ | (1.433 | ) | | $ | 0.262 | | | $ | 0.512 | | | $ | 0.256 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.388 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.372 | ) | | $ | (0.372 | ) | | $ | (0.376 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.000 | )(2) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.388 | ) | | $ | (0.377 | ) | | $ | (0.372 | ) | | $ | (0.372 | ) | | $ | (0.376 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | $ | 0.000 | (2) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 4.020 | | | $ | 3.300 | | | $ | 5.110 | | | $ | 5.220 | | | $ | 5.080 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 36.97 | % | | | (29.79 | )% | | | 5.09 | % | | | 10.41 | % | | | 5.32 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 115,927 | | | $ | 89,841 | | | $ | 162,153 | | | $ | 172,200 | | | $ | 188,454 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 2.02 | % | | | 1.86 | % | | | 1.79 | % | | | 1.72 | % | | | 1.72 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 10.26 | % | | | 8.28 | % | | | 7.22 | % | | | 7.05 | % | | | 6.96 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 72 | % | | | 48 | % | | | 81 | % | | | 62 | % | | | 62 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Total return reflects an increase of 0.20% due to a change in the timing of the payment and reinvestment of distributions. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 3.980 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.019 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | | 0.057 | | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 0.076 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.036 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.036 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Redemption fees | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 4.020 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 1.92 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 1,099 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 1.02 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 11.17 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 72 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, October 1, 2009, to October 31, 2009. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
|
(8) | | For the Portfolio’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in High Income Opportunities Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (60.5% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $218,731,834 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2010 ($143,280,458), October 31, 2016 ($33,167,924) and October 31, 2017 ($42,283,452).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
11
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Redemption Fees — Upon the redemption or exchange of shares by Class A and Class I shareholders within 90 days of the settlement of purchase, a fee of 1% of the current net asset value of these shares will be assessed and retained by the Fund for the benefit of the remaining shareholders. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in capital.
I Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund declares dividends daily to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are generally paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any) are made at least annually. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 41,341,526 | | | $ | 44,654,280 | | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | 48,696 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $224,360,315 accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income was decreased by $3,015,672 and paid-in capital was decreased by $227,375,987 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss), swap contracts, premium amortization and defaulted bonds, and expired capital loss carryforwards. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 5,095,131 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (218,731,834 | ) | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (62,657,284 | ) | | |
Other temporary differences | | $ | (1,734,153 | ) | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, swap contracts, premium amortization, the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders, defaulted bonds and partnership allocations.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
Eaton Vance Management (EVM) serves as the administrator to the Fund, but receives no compensation. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $24,560 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $35,717 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
12
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $446,862 for Class A shares. The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 5% and 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, respectively, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $529,096 and $677,793 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $23,003,000 and $48,770,000, respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $176,366 and $225,931 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $5,000, $125,000 and $8,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $43,137,843 and $74,542,881, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 11,837,243 | | | | 6,300,125 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 3,309,499 | | | | 2,054,963 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (12,106,855 | ) | | | (17,660,527 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 7,360,024 | | | | 8,561,127 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 10,399,911 | | | | (744,312 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
13
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 2,108,476 | | | | 1,479,960 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,137,441 | | | | 1,265,884 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (5,059,818 | ) | | | (10,359,876 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (7,348,037 | ) | | | (8,569,154 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (9,161,938 | ) | | | (16,183,186 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 6,266,836 | | | | 3,207,390 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,360,890 | | | | 987,741 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (6,039,116 | ) | | | (8,677,278 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 1,588,610 | | | | (4,482,147 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Period Ended
| | | | | | |
Class I | | October 31, 2009(1) | | | | | | |
|
Sales | | | 273,186 | | | | | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 273,186 | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class I commenced operations on October 1, 2009. |
For the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the Fund received $7,236 and $3,495, respectively, in redemption fees.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 23, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
14
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance High
Income Opportunities Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund (“the Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 23, 2009
15
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of qualified dividend income for individuals.
Qualified Dividend Income. The Fund designates approximately $209,264 or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
16
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Floating-Rate Interests — 7.7%(1) |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace — 0.1% |
|
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition, Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing 3/26/14 | | $ | 1,097 | | | $ | 871,854 | | | |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition, Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing 3/26/14 | | | 65 | | | | 51,589 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 923,443 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Automotive & Auto Parts — 1.0% |
|
EPD Holdings, (Goodyear Engineering Products), Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.00%, Maturing 7/13/15 | | $ | 2,560 | | | $ | 1,561,600 | | | |
Ford Motor Co., Revolving Loan, Maturing 12/15/13(2) | | | 1,100 | | | | 1,000,450 | | | |
Ford Motor Co., Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing 12/16/13 | | | 4,726 | | | | 4,224,103 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,786,153 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Broadcasting — 0.7% |
|
HIT Entertainment, Inc., Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.98%, Maturing 2/5/13 | | $ | 9,180 | | | $ | 4,980,150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,980,150 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building Materials — 0.4% |
|
Panolam Industries Holdings, Inc., Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing 9/30/12 | | $ | 3,580 | | | $ | 3,230,950 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,230,950 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Goods — 0.1% |
|
Dresser, Inc., Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.00%, Maturing 5/4/15 | | $ | 1,080 | | | $ | 982,800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 982,800 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Products — 0.2% |
|
Amscan Holdings, Inc., Term Loan, 2.65%, Maturing 5/25/13 | | $ | 1,511 | | | $ | 1,372,718 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,372,718 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronics / Electrical — 0.3% |
|
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing 11/29/13 | | $ | 2,508 | | | $ | 2,044,338 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,044,338 | | | |
|
|
|
Food & Drug Retail — 0.8% |
|
Rite Aid Corp., Term Loan, 9.50%, Maturing 6/10/15 | | $ | 2,860 | | | $ | 2,964,868 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp., Term Loan, Maturing 10/30/14(2) | | | 820 | | | | 822,967 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp., Term Loan, Maturing 4/30/15(2) | | | 902 | | | | 905,263 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp., Term Loan, Maturing 4/30/15(2) | | | 410 | | | | 411,483 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp., Term Loan, Maturing 4/30/15(2) | | | 287 | | | | 288,038 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,392,619 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food / Beverage / Tobacco — 0.3% |
|
Dole Food Company, Inc., Term Loan, 7.78%, Maturing 4/12/13 | | $ | 271 | | | $ | 274,349 | | | |
Dole Food Company, Inc., Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing 4/12/13 | | | 473 | | | | 478,348 | | | |
Dole Food Company, Inc., Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing 4/12/13 | | | 1,698 | | | | 1,718,073 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,470,770 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Gaming — 0.7% |
|
BLB Worldwide Holdings, Term Loan - Second Lien, 0.00%, Maturing 7/18/12(3) | | $ | 5,410 | | | $ | 365,175 | | | |
Cannery Casino Resorts, LLC, Term Loan - Second Lien, 4.50%, Maturing 5/16/14 | | | 1,580 | | | | 1,149,450 | | | |
Great Lakes Entertainment, Term Loan, 9.00%, Maturing 8/15/12 | | | 3,460 | | | | 3,338,609 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,853,234 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care — 0.6% |
|
IASIS Healthcare, (PIK), Term Loan, 5.53%, Maturing 6/13/14 | | $ | 2,051 | | | $ | 1,835,948 | | | |
Viant Holdings, Inc., Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing 6/25/14 | | | 2,553 | | | | 2,489,516 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,325,464 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 0.3% |
|
HUB International, Ltd., Term Loan, Maturing 6/12/14(2) | | $ | 1,870 | | | $ | 1,836,106 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,836,106 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements17
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Services — 1.3% |
|
Neff Rental, Inc., Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.78%, Maturing 11/20/14 | | $ | 1,310 | | | $ | 275,100 | | | |
Rental Service Corp., Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.82%, Maturing 11/30/13 | | | 3,064 | | | | 2,780,860 | | | |
Travelport, LLC, Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing 8/23/13 | | | 466 | | | | 425,277 | | | |
Travelport, LLC, Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing 8/23/13 | | | 2,615 | | | | 2,386,598 | | | |
Travelport, LLC, Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing 8/23/13 | | | 465 | | | | 423,902 | | | |
Travelport, LLC, Term Loan, 10.50%, Maturing 8/23/13 | | | 2,643 | | | | 2,687,432 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,979,169 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Steel — 0.2% |
|
RathGibson, Inc., DIP Loan, 10.70%, Maturing 2/10/10 | | $ | 1,612 | | | $ | 1,612,308 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,612,308 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Transportation Ex Air / Rail — 0.1% |
|
CEVA Group, PLC, Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing 6/29/15 | | $ | 745 | | | $ | 628,566 | | | |
CEVA Group, PLC, Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing 8/2/15 | | | 250 | | | | 207,842 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 836,408 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Utilities — 0.6% |
|
TXU Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co., LLC, Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing 10/10/14 | | $ | 5,521 | | | $ | 4,291,843 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,291,843 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Senior Floating-Rate Interests | | |
(identified cost $62,202,989) | | $ | 54,918,473 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes — 87.5% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace — 0.4% |
|
Alion Science and Technologies Corp., 10.25%, 2/1/15 | | $ | 1,625 | | | $ | 1,153,750 | | | |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition, 9.75%, 4/1/17 | | | 1,460 | | | | 981,850 | | | |
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., 7.50%, 10/1/17(4) | | | 635 | | | | 633,413 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,769,013 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Air Transportation — 0.1% |
|
Continental Airlines, 7.033%, 6/15/11 | | $ | 1,026 | | | $ | 923,230 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 923,230 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Automotive & Auto Parts — 4.6% |
|
Affinia Group, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.75%, 8/15/16(4) | | $ | 525 | | | $ | 578,813 | | | |
Allison Transmission, Inc., 11.00%, 11/1/15(4) | | | 355 | | | | 363,875 | | | |
Allison Transmission, Inc., (PIK), 11.25%, 11/1/15(4) | | | 3,510 | | | | 3,295,012 | | | |
Altra Industrial Motion, Inc., 9.00%, 12/1/11 | | | 3,660 | | | | 3,756,075 | | | |
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 7/1/13 | | | 1,660 | | | | 954,500 | | | |
Ford Motor Credit Co., Sr. Notes, 7.50%, 8/1/12 | | | 3,645 | | | | 3,551,852 | | | |
Ford Motor Credit Co., Sr. Notes, 7.80%, 6/1/12 | | | 2,560 | | | | 2,508,106 | | | |
Ford Motor Credit Co., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 12/15/16 | | | 4,890 | | | | 4,730,053 | | | |
Ford Motor Credit Co., Sr. Notes, 9.875%, 8/10/11 | | | 2,530 | | | | 2,588,911 | | | |
Ford Motor Credit Co., Sr. Notes, 12.00%, 5/15/15 | | | 1,305 | | | | 1,471,157 | | | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (The), Sr. Notes, 10.50%, 5/15/16 | | | 3,770 | | | | 4,099,875 | | | |
Navistar International Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.25%, 11/1/21 | | | 3,200 | | | | 3,140,000 | | | |
United Components, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.375%, 6/15/13 | | | 1,670 | | | | 1,590,675 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 32,628,904 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Banks and Thrifts — 0.6% |
|
General Motors Acceptance Corp., 6.875%, 9/15/11(4) | | $ | 571 | | | $ | 553,870 | | | |
General Motors Acceptance Corp., 8.00%, 11/1/31(4) | | | 4,005 | | | | 3,464,325 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,018,195 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Broadcasting — 1.4% |
|
Cequel Communications Holdings, LLC, 8.625%, 11/15/17(4) | | $ | 2,020 | | | $ | 1,991,909 | | | |
Rainbow National Services, LLC, Sr. Sub. Notes., 10.375%, 9/1/14(4) | | | 1,675 | | | | 1,767,125 | | | |
See notes to financial statements18
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Broadcasting (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Sirius XM Radio, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.75%, 9/1/15(4) | | $ | 1,305 | | | $ | 1,337,625 | | | |
XM Satellite Radio Holdings, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.25%, 6/15/13(4) | | | 2,120 | | | | 2,236,600 | | | |
XM Satellite Radio Holdings, Inc., Sr. Notes, 13.00%, 8/1/13(4) | | | 2,515 | | | | 2,515,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,848,259 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building Materials — 0.5% |
|
Interface, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.375%, 11/1/13(4) | | $ | 640 | | | $ | 694,400 | | | |
Interface, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.50%, 2/1/14 | | | 745 | | | | 735,688 | | | |
Panolam Industries International, Sr. Sub. Notes, 10.75%, 10/1/13(3) | | | 5,230 | | | | 1,699,750 | | | |
USG Corp., 9.75%, 8/1/14(4) | | | 670 | | | | 706,850 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,836,688 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Cable / Satellite TV — 1.7% |
|
CCO Holdings, LLC/CCO Capital Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.75%, 11/15/13(3) | | $ | 3,465 | | | $ | 3,802,837 | | | |
Charter Communications, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.375%, 4/30/14(3)(4) | | | 310 | | | | 316,975 | | | |
Charter Communications, Inc., Sr. Notes, 12.875%, 9/15/14(3)(4) | | | 2,340 | | | | 2,597,400 | | | |
Kabel Deutschland GmbH, 10.625%, 7/1/14 | | | 2,835 | | | | 3,001,556 | | | |
Virgin Media Finance PLC, 9.50%, 8/15/16 | | | 2,005 | | | | 2,130,313 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,849,081 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Goods — 1.7% |
|
American Railcar Industry, Sr. Notes, 7.50%, 3/1/14 | | $ | 1,620 | | | $ | 1,482,300 | | | |
Chart Industries, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.125%, 10/15/15 | | | 2,370 | | | | 2,370,000 | | | |
ESCO Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.625%, 12/15/13(4) | | | 1,720 | | | | 1,707,100 | | | |
RBS Global & Rexnord Corp., 9.50%, 8/1/14(4) | | | 1,947 | | | | 1,937,265 | | | |
RBS Global & Rexnord Corp., 11.75%, 8/1/16 | | | 1,870 | | | | 1,823,250 | | | |
Terex Corp., Sr. Notes, 10.875%, 6/1/16 | | | 2,555 | | | | 2,772,175 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,092,090 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 2.8% |
|
Ashland, Inc., 9.125%, 6/1/17(4) | | $ | 1,945 | | | $ | 2,105,463 | | | |
CII Carbon, LLC, 11.125%, 11/15/15(4) | | | 1,665 | | | | 1,648,350 | | | |
Dow Chemical Co. (The), 8.55%, 5/15/19 | | | 4,135 | | | | 4,728,513 | | | |
INEOS Group Holdings PLC, Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.50%, 2/15/16(4) | | | 4,115 | | | | 2,324,975 | | | |
Nova Chemicals Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.375%, 11/1/16(4) | | | 1,610 | | | | 1,626,100 | | | |
Reichhold Industries, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 8/15/14(4) | | | 5,520 | | | | 4,498,800 | | | |
Solutia, Inc., 8.75%, 11/1/17 | | | 1,420 | | | | 1,476,800 | | | |
Terra Capital, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.75%, 11/1/19(4) | | | 1,555 | | | | 1,570,550 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 19,979,551 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Products — 1.5% |
|
ACCO Brands Corp., 7.625%, 8/15/15 | | $ | 1,190 | | | $ | 1,082,900 | | | |
ACCO Brands Corp., Sr. Notes, 10.625%, 3/15/15(4) | | | 1,920 | | | | 2,064,000 | | | |
Amscan Holdings, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.75%, 5/1/14 | | | 5,960 | | | | 5,662,000 | | | |
Sealy Mattress Co., 8.25%, 6/15/14 | | | 1,195 | | | | 1,165,125 | | | |
Sealy Mattress Co., Sr. Notes, 10.875%, 4/15/16(4) | | | 400 | | | | 450,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,424,025 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Containers — 1.3% |
|
Intertape Polymer US, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.50%, 8/1/14 | | $ | 3,855 | | | $ | 3,026,175 | | | |
Pliant Corp., Sr. Notes, 11.625%, 6/15/10(3) | | | 5,524 | | | | 4,875,244 | | | |
Solo Cup Co., Sr. Notes, 10.50%, 11/1/13(4) | | | 1,295 | | | | 1,379,175 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,280,594 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services — 0.2% |
|
Cantor Fitzgerald, LP, 7.875%, 10/15/19(4) | | $ | 1,600 | | | $ | 1,613,872 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,613,872 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Media — 3.8% |
|
Affinion Group, Inc., 10.125%, 10/15/13 | | $ | 1,125 | | | $ | 1,158,750 | | | |
Affinion Group, Inc., 11.50%, 10/15/15 | | | 2,490 | | | | 2,614,500 | | | |
Catalina Marketing Corp., 11.625%, 10/1/17(4) | | | 2,965 | | | | 3,016,887 | | | |
Catalina Marketing Corp., (PIK), 10.50%, 10/1/15(4) | | | 510 | | | | 518,925 | | | |
Interpublic Group Cos., Inc., 10.00%, 7/15/17 | | | 2,570 | | | | 2,775,600 | | | |
LBI Media, Inc., Sr. Disc. Notes, 11.00%, 10/15/13 | | | 2,760 | | | | 1,756,050 | | | |
LBI Media, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.50%, 8/1/17(4) | | | 3,950 | | | | 2,789,688 | | | |
MDC Partners, Inc., 11.00%, 11/1/16(4) | | | 2,200 | | | | 2,213,750 | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC, 10.00%, 8/1/14 | | | 3,630 | | | | 3,757,050 | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC, 11.50%, 5/1/16 | | | 1,870 | | | | 1,996,225 | | | |
See notes to financial statements19
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Diversified Media (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC, 12.50%, (0.00% until 8/1/11), 8/1/16 | | $ | 1,520 | | | $ | 1,324,300 | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC, Sr. Notes, 11.625%, 2/1/14 | | | 220 | | | | 235,950 | | | |
Warner Music Group Acquisition Corp., Sr. Notes, 9.50%, 6/15/16(4) | | | 2,935 | | | | 3,147,787 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 27,305,462 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy — 8.2% |
|
Allis-Chalmers Energy, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 1/15/14 | | $ | 2,105 | | | $ | 1,789,250 | | | |
Berry Petroleum Co., Sr. Notes, 10.25%, 6/1/14 | | | 1,905 | | | | 2,047,875 | | | |
Bill Barrett Corp., 9.875%, 7/15/16 | | | 385 | | | | 410,025 | | | |
Clayton Williams Energy, Inc., 7.75%, 8/1/13 | | | 2,600 | | | | 2,275,000 | | | |
Compton Pet Finance Corp., 7.625%, 12/1/13 | | | 2,545 | | | | 1,889,663 | | | |
Denbury Resources, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.75%, 3/1/16 | | | 3,050 | | | | 3,286,375 | | | |
El Paso Corp., Sr. Notes, 9.625%, 5/15/12 | | | 2,880 | | | | 3,009,470 | | | |
Forbes Energy Services, Sr. Notes, 11.00%, 2/15/15 | | | 4,040 | | | | 3,403,700 | | | |
Holly Corp., 9.875%, 6/15/17(4) | | | 3,025 | | | | 3,146,000 | | | |
OPTI Canada, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.875%, 12/15/14 | | | 1,915 | | | | 1,503,275 | | | |
OPTI Canada, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.25%, 12/15/14 | | | 2,060 | | | | 1,627,400 | | | |
Petroleum Development Corp., Sr. Notes, 12.00%, 2/15/18 | | | 1,570 | | | | 1,573,925 | | | |
Petroplus Finance, Ltd., 6.75%, 5/1/14(4) | | | 200 | | | | 188,000 | | | |
Petroplus Finance, Ltd., 7.00%, 5/1/17(4) | | | 3,755 | | | | 3,417,050 | | | |
Petroplus Finance, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 9.375%, 9/15/19(4) | | | 3,235 | | | | 3,259,262 | | | |
Quicksilver Resources, Inc., 7.125%, 4/1/16 | | | 4,300 | | | | 3,880,750 | | | |
Quicksilver Resources, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.75%, 1/1/16 | | | 2,720 | | | | 3,032,800 | | | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 6/1/18(4) | | | 1,805 | | | | 1,795,975 | | | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc., Sr. Notes, (PIK), 8.625%, 4/1/15 | | | 4,240 | | | | 4,324,800 | | | |
SemGroup, L.P., Sr. Notes, 8.75%, 11/15/15(3)(4) | | | 6,330 | | | | 411,450 | | | |
SESI, LLC, Sr. Notes, 6.875%, 6/1/14 | | | 700 | | | | 686,000 | | | |
Stewart & Stevenson, LLC, Sr. Notes, 10.00%, 7/15/14 | | | 2,800 | | | | 2,590,000 | | | |
Tesoro Corp., 9.75%, 6/1/19 | | | 650 | | | | 671,125 | | | |
United Refining Co., Sr. Notes, 10.50%, 8/15/12 | | | 9,420 | | | | 8,148,300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 58,367,470 | | | |
|
|
|
Entertainment / Film — 1.5% |
|
AMC Entertainment, Inc., 11.00%, 2/1/16 | | $ | 10,255 | | | $ | 10,819,025 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,819,025 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Environmental — 0.9% |
|
Casella Waste Systems, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.00%, 7/15/14(4) | | $ | 650 | | | $ | 697,125 | | | |
Clean Harbors, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.625%, 8/15/16(4) | | | 900 | | | | 927,000 | | | |
Waste Services, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.50%, 4/15/14 | | | 4,915 | | | | 4,964,150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,588,275 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food & Drug Retail — 0.4% |
|
Duane Reade, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.75%, 8/1/15(4) | | $ | 390 | | | $ | 417,300 | | | |
Supervalu, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 5/1/16 | | | 2,110 | | | | 2,157,475 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,574,775 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food / Beverage / Tobacco — 2.3% |
|
ASG Consolidated, LLC/ASG Finance, Inc., Sr. Disc. Notes, 11.50%, 11/1/11 | | $ | 6,585 | | | $ | 6,469,762 | | | |
Dole Foods Co., 13.875%, 3/15/14(4) | | | 2,585 | | | | 3,037,375 | | | |
Smithfield Foods, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.00%, 8/1/11 | | | 4,535 | | | | 4,398,950 | | | |
Smithfield Foods, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.00%, 7/15/14(4) | | | 2,015 | | | | 2,125,825 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 16,031,912 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Gaming — 6.3% |
|
Buffalo Thunder Development Authority, 9.375%, 12/15/14(3)(4) | | $ | 5,755 | | | $ | 1,093,450 | | | |
CCM Merger, Inc., 8.00%, 8/1/13(4) | | | 3,635 | | | | 2,998,875 | | | |
Chukchansi EDA, Sr. Notes, Variable Rate, 4.913%, 11/15/12(4) | | | 595 | | | | 371,875 | | | |
Eldorado Casino Shreveport, 10.00%, 8/1/12(5) | | | 705 | | | | 621,378 | | | |
Fontainebleau Las Vegas Casino, LLC, 11.00%, 6/15/15(3)(4) | | | 9,480 | | | | 379,200 | | | |
Galaxy Entertainment Finance, 9.875%, 12/15/12(4) | | | 3,970 | | | | 3,910,450 | | | |
Galaxy Entertainment Finance, Variable Rate, 6.218%, 12/15/10(4) | | | 265 | | | | 261,025 | | | |
Greektown Holdings, LLC, Sr. Notes, 10.75%, 12/1/13(3)(4) | | | 1,180 | | | | 241,900 | | | |
Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.25%, 6/1/17(4) | | | 1,755 | | | | 1,798,875 | | | |
Harrah’s Operating Escrow Corp., Sr. Notes, 11.25%, 6/1/17(4) | | | 1,560 | | | | 1,599,000 | | | |
See notes to financial statements20
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Gaming (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Indianapolis Downs, LLC & Capital Corp., Sr. Notes, 11.00%, 11/1/12(4) | | $ | 1,980 | | | $ | 1,277,100 | | | |
Inn of the Mountain Gods, Sr. Notes, 12.00%, 11/15/10(3) | | | 3,615 | | | | 1,455,038 | | | |
Majestic HoldCo, LLC, 12.50%, 10/15/11(3)(4) | | | 1,620 | | | | 1,944 | | | |
MGM Mirage, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.375%, 5/15/14(4) | | | 1,305 | | | | 1,396,350 | | | |
MGM Mirage, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.125%, 11/15/17(4) | | | 1,350 | | | | 1,491,750 | | | |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, Sr. Sub. Notes, 6.875%, 2/15/15 | | | 2,930 | | | | 1,948,450 | | | |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, Sr. Sub. Notes, 7.125%, 8/15/14 | | | 2,760 | | | | 1,945,800 | | | |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.00%, 4/1/12 | | | 3,250 | | | | 2,778,750 | | | |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.375%, 7/1/11 | | | 1,000 | | | | 906,505 | | | |
Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority, Sr. Sub. Notes, 11.50%, 11/1/17(4) | | | 1,620 | | | | 1,591,650 | | | |
MTR Gaming Group, Inc., 12.625%, 7/15/14(4) | | | 2,055 | | | | 2,024,175 | | | |
Peninsula Gaming, LLC, 8.375%, 8/15/15(4) | | | 390 | | | | 389,025 | | | |
Peninsula Gaming, LLC, 10.75%, 8/15/17(4) | | | 1,760 | | | | 1,755,600 | | | |
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 7.50%, 6/15/15 | | | 1,235 | | | | 1,117,675 | | | |
Pokagon Gaming Authority, Sr. Notes, 10.375%, 6/15/14(4) | | | 1,184 | | | | 1,231,360 | | | |
San Pasqual Casino, 8.00%, 9/15/13(4) | | | 1,335 | | | | 1,274,925 | | | |
Seminole Hard Rock Entertainment, Variable Rate, 2.799%, 3/15/14(4) | | | 2,190 | | | | 1,773,900 | | | |
Tunica-Biloxi Gaming Authority, Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 11/15/15(4) | | | 3,605 | | | | 3,262,525 | | | |
Waterford Gaming, LLC, Sr. Notes, 8.625%, 9/15/14(4) | | | 4,925 | | | | 3,931,135 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 44,829,685 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care — 7.0% |
|
Accellent, Inc., 10.50%, 12/1/13 | | $ | 2,465 | | | $ | 2,428,025 | | | |
AMR HoldCo, Inc./EmCare HoldCo, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 10.00%, 2/15/15 | | | 4,860 | | | | 5,127,300 | | | |
Apria Healthcare Group, Inc., Sr. Notes, 12.375%, 11/1/14(4) | | | 320 | | | | 349,600 | | | |
Biomet, Inc., 11.625%, 10/15/17 | | | 6,975 | | | | 7,681,219 | | | |
Biomet, Inc., (PIK), 10.375%, 10/15/17 | | | 640 | | | | 692,000 | | | |
DJO Finance, LLC/DJO Finance Corp., 10.875%, 11/15/14 | | | 3,465 | | | | 3,629,587 | | | |
Fresenius US Finance II, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 7/15/15(4) | | | 995 | | | | 1,099,475 | | | |
HCA, Inc., 9.875%, 2/15/17(4) | | | 2,195 | | | | 2,370,600 | | | |
Inverness Medical Innovations, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.00%, 5/15/16 | | | 3,230 | | | | 3,286,525 | | | |
MultiPlan, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 10.375%, 4/15/16(4) | | | 5,535 | | | | 5,341,275 | | | |
National Mentor Holdings, Inc., 11.25%, 7/1/14 | | | 3,670 | | | | 3,660,825 | | | |
Res-Care, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.75%, 10/15/13 | | | 2,370 | | | | 2,358,150 | | | |
Rural/Metro Corp., 9.875%, 3/15/15 | | | 870 | | | | 876,525 | | | |
Rural/Metro Corp., Sr. Disc. Notes, 12.75%, (0.00% until 3/15/10), 3/15/16 | | | 2,070 | | | | 2,070,000 | | | |
Talecris Biotherapeutics Holdings Corp., Sr. Notes, 7.75%, 11/15/16(4) | | | 2,800 | | | | 2,849,000 | | | |
US Oncology, Inc., 10.75%, 8/15/14 | | | 1,655 | | | | 1,737,750 | | | |
US Oncology, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.125%, 8/15/17(4) | | | 2,040 | | | | 2,162,400 | | | |
Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, 8.375%, 6/15/16(4) | | | 1,375 | | | | 1,412,813 | | | |
Viant Holdings, Inc., 10.125%, 7/15/17(4) | | | 440 | | | | 420,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 49,553,269 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Homebuilders / Real Estate — 0.3% |
|
CB Richard Ellis Service, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 11.625%, 6/15/17 | | $ | 1,990 | | | $ | 2,176,563 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,176,563 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 0.5% |
|
Alliant Holdings I, Inc., 11.00%, 5/1/15(4) | | $ | 1,795 | | | $ | 1,759,100 | | | |
HUB International Holdings, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 12/15/14(4) | | | 670 | | | | 643,200 | | | |
U.S.I. Holdings Corp., Sr. Notes, Variable Rate, 4.315%, 11/15/14(4) | | | 1,200 | | | | 996,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,398,300 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Leisure — 2.0% |
|
HRP Myrtle Beach Operations, LLC/HRP Myrtle Beach Capital Corp., 12.50%, 4/1/13(3)(4)(5) | | $ | 2,315 | | | $ | 0 | | | |
HRP Myrtle Beach Operations, LLC/HRP Myrtle Beach Capital Corp., Variable Rate, 0.00%, 4/1/12(3)(4)(5) | | | 3,985 | | | | 0 | | | |
HRP Myrtle Beach Operations, LLC/HRP Myrtle Beach Capital Corp., Sr. Notes, (PIK), 14.50%, 4/1/14(3)(4)(5) | | | 3,274 | | | | 0 | | | |
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Sr. Notes, 6.875%, 12/1/13 | | | 858 | | | | 816,769 | | | |
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Sr. Notes, 7.00%, 6/15/13 | | | 1,750 | | | | 1,697,500 | | | |
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Sr. Notes, 7.25%, 6/15/16 | | | 535 | | | | 500,225 | | | |
See notes to financial statements21
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Leisure (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Sr. Notes, 7.25%, 3/15/18 | | $ | 1,355 | | | $ | 1,239,825 | | | |
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Sr. Notes, 8.75%, 2/2/11 | | | 255 | | | | 258,825 | | | |
Universal City Florida Holdings, Sr. Notes, 8.375%, 5/1/10 | | | 885 | | | | 889,425 | | | |
Universal City Florida Holdings, Sr. Notes, Variable Rate, 5.233%, 5/1/10 | | | 8,465 | | | | 8,507,325 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,909,894 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Metals / Mining — 3.3% |
|
Arch Coal, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.75%, 8/1/16(4) | | $ | 765 | | | $ | 787,950 | | | |
FMG Finance PTY, Ltd., 10.625%, 9/1/16(4) | | | 5,820 | | | | 6,416,550 | | | |
Murray Energy Corp., Sr. Notes, 10.25%, 10/15/15(4) | | | 3,865 | | | | 3,845,675 | | | |
Novelis, Inc./GA, Sr. Notes, 11.50%, 2/15/15(4) | | | 785 | | | | 820,325 | | | |
Teck Resources, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 9.75%, 5/15/14 | | | 2,555 | | | | 2,880,762 | | | |
Teck Resources, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 10.25%, 5/15/16 | | | 1,915 | | | | 2,216,613 | | | |
Teck Resources, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 10.75%, 5/15/19 | | | 5,805 | | | | 6,791,850 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 23,759,725 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Paper — 4.5% |
|
Boise Paper Holdings, LLC, Sr. Notes, 9.00%, 11/1/17(4) | | $ | 1,825 | | | $ | 1,852,375 | | | |
Domtar Corp., Sr. Notes, 10.75%, 6/1/17 | | | 2,680 | | | | 3,088,700 | | | |
International Paper Co., 7.95%, 6/15/18 | | | 2,320 | | | | 2,590,046 | | | |
International Paper Co., 9.375%, 5/15/19 | | | 7,525 | | | | 9,124,710 | | | |
International Paper Co., Sr. Notes, 7.50%, 8/15/21 | | | 890 | | | | 976,577 | | | |
Jefferson Smurfit Corp., Sr. Notes, 7.50%, 6/1/13(3) | | | 887 | | | | 696,295 | | | |
Jefferson Smurfit Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.25%, 10/1/12(3) | | | 1,225 | | | | 949,375 | | | |
NewPage Corp., 10.00%, 5/1/12 | | | 1,190 | | | | 785,400 | | | |
NewPage Corp., Sr. Notes, 11.375%, 12/31/14(4) | | | 7,900 | | | | 7,919,750 | | | |
Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 3/15/17(3) | | | 3,000 | | | | 2,325,000 | | | |
Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., Sr. Notes, 8.375%, 7/1/12(3) | | | 605 | | | | 476,437 | | | |
Verso Paper Holdings, LLC/Verso Paper, Inc., 11.375%, 8/1/16 | | | 1,820 | | | | 1,192,100 | | | |
Verso Paper Holdings, LLC/Verso Paper, Inc., Sr. Notes, Variable Rate, 4.233%, 8/1/14 | | | 245 | | | | 161,700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 32,138,465 | | | |
|
|
|
Publishing / Printing — 0.1% |
|
Dex Media West/Finance, Series B, 9.875%, 8/15/13(3) | | $ | 1,835 | | | $ | 371,588 | | | |
Local Insight Regatta Holdings, Inc., 11.00%, 12/1/17 | | | 695 | | | | 344,025 | | | |
Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. (The), Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.00%, 2/15/17(3) | | | 5,520 | | | | 82,800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 798,413 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Railroad — 0.2% |
|
Kansas City Southern Mexico, Sr. Notes, 7.375%, 6/1/14 | | $ | 1,150 | | | $ | 1,092,500 | | | |
Kansas City Southern Mexico, Sr. Notes, 7.625%, 12/1/13 | | | 650 | | | | 627,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,719,750 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Restaurants — 1.0% |
|
El Pollo Loco, Inc., 11.75%, 11/15/13 | | $ | 3,175 | | | $ | 2,936,875 | | | |
NPC International, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 9.50%, 5/1/14 | | | 4,375 | | | | 4,342,187 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,279,062 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Services — 4.9% |
|
Education Management, LLC, Sr. Sub. Notes, 10.25%, 6/1/16 | | $ | 998 | | | $ | 1,092,810 | | | |
GEO Group, Inc. (The), 7.75%, 10/15/17(4) | | | 265 | | | | 270,300 | | | |
Hertz Corp., 8.875%, 1/1/14 | | | 255 | | | | 259,463 | | | |
Hertz Corp., 10.50%, 1/1/16 | | | 350 | | | | 366,625 | | | |
Laureate Education, Inc., 10.00%, 8/15/15(4) | | | 6,040 | | | | 5,919,200 | | | |
Laureate Education, Inc., 11.75%, 8/15/17(4) | | | 3,930 | | | | 3,841,575 | | | |
Laureate Education, Inc., (PIK), 10.25%, 8/15/15(4) | | | 7,770 | | | | 7,026,153 | | | |
MediMedia USA, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 11.375%, 11/15/14(4) | | | 2,575 | | | | 1,918,375 | | | |
Muzak, LLC/Muzak Finance, Sr. Notes, 10.00%, 2/15/09(9) | | | 2,640 | | | | 1,135,200 | | | |
Rental Service Corp., 9.50%, 12/1/14 | | | 2,220 | | | | 2,203,350 | | | |
RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.00%, 7/15/17(4) | | | 3,015 | | | | 3,286,350 | | | |
Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc., 10.75%, 8/1/16 | | | 2,340 | | | | 2,421,900 | | | |
United Rentals North America, Inc., 10.875%, 6/15/16(4) | | | 2,345 | | | | 2,556,050 | | | |
West Corp., 9.50%, 10/15/14 | | | 2,480 | | | | 2,492,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 34,789,751 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements22
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Steel — 0.3% |
|
RathGibson, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.25%, 2/15/14(3) | | $ | 5,225 | | | $ | 1,920,188 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,920,188 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Super Retail — 8.8% |
|
General Nutrition Center, Sr. Notes, (PIK), Variable Rate, 5.178%, 3/15/14 | | $ | 7,445 | | | $ | 6,663,275 | | | |
General Nutrition Center, Sr. Sub. Notes, 10.75%, 3/15/15 | | | 5,070 | | | | 5,133,375 | | | |
Limited Brands, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.50%, 6/15/19(4) | | | 3,745 | | | | 3,950,975 | | | |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., 9.00%, 10/15/15 | | | 7,064 | | | | 6,258,596 | | | |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., 10.375%, 10/15/15 | | | 5,100 | | | | 4,513,500 | | | |
Sally Holdings, LLC, Sr. Notes, 10.50%, 11/15/16 | | | 5,840 | | | | 6,219,600 | | | |
Sonic Automotive, Inc., 5.00%, 10/1/29 | | | 2,200 | | | | 2,172,500 | | | |
Toys “R” Us, 7.375%, 10/15/18 | | | 260 | | | | 232,700 | | | |
Toys “R” Us, 7.625%, 8/1/11 | | | 6,140 | | | | 6,170,700 | | | |
Toys “R” Us, 7.875%, 4/15/13 | | | 4,705 | | | | 4,599,137 | | | |
Toys “R” Us, 10.75%, 7/15/17(4) | | | 3,945 | | | | 4,300,050 | | | |
United Auto Group, Inc., 7.75%, 12/15/16 | | | 2,000 | | | | 1,940,000 | | | |
Yankee Acquisition Corp., 8.50%, 2/15/15 | | | 5,876 | | | | 5,640,960 | | | |
Yankee Acquisition Corp., 9.75%, 2/15/17 | | | 4,950 | | | | 4,690,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 62,485,493 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Technology — 3.5% |
|
Amkor Technologies, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.25%, 6/1/16 | | $ | 4,295 | | | $ | 4,509,750 | | | |
Avago Technologies Finance, 11.875%, 12/1/15 | | | 2,925 | | | | 3,217,500 | | | |
Avaya, Inc., Sr. Notes, 9.75%, 11/1/15(4) | | | 2,930 | | | | 2,827,450 | | | |
Avaya, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.125%, 11/1/15(4) | | | 4,545 | | | | 3,905,882 | | | |
Ceridian Corp., Sr. Notes, 11.25%, 11/15/15 | | | 3,585 | | | | 3,468,488 | | | |
Jabil Circuit, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.75%, 7/15/16 | | | 310 | | | | 323,175 | | | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., Sr. Notes, 10.625%, 5/15/15(4) | | | 6,375 | | | | 6,900,937 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 25,153,182 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications — 6.6% |
|
Digicel Group, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 9.125%, 1/15/15(4) | | $ | 9,812 | | | $ | 9,468,580 | | | |
Digicel Group, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 9.25%, 9/1/12(4) | | | 3,795 | | | | 3,870,900 | | | |
Digicel Group, Ltd., Sr. Notes, 12.00%, 4/1/14(4) | | | 1,195 | | | | 1,353,338 | | | |
Intelsat Bermuda, Ltd., 11.25%, 6/15/16 | | | 3,050 | | | | 3,263,500 | | | |
Intelsat Corp., 9.25%, 8/15/14 | | | 1,385 | | | | 1,416,162 | | | |
Intelsat Jackson Holdings, Ltd., 9.50%, 6/15/16 | | | 4,003 | | | | 4,223,165 | | | |
Intelsat Subsidiary Holdings Co., Ltd., 8.875%, 1/15/15 | | | 660 | | | | 669,075 | | | |
Intelsat Subsidiary Holdings Co., Ltd., 8.875%, 1/15/15(4) | | | 865 | | | | 872,569 | | | |
NII Capital Corp., 10.00%, 8/15/16(4) | | | 2,740 | | | | 2,904,400 | | | |
SBA Telecommunications, Inc., 8.00%, 8/15/16(4) | | | 1,145 | | | | 1,190,800 | | | |
SBA Telecommunications, Inc., 8.25%, 8/15/19(4) | | | 765 | | | | 803,250 | | | |
Sprint Capital Corp., 6.875%, 11/15/28 | | | 1,115 | | | | 841,825 | | | |
Telesat Canada/Telesat, LLC, Sr. Notes, 11.00%, 11/1/15 | | | 7,770 | | | | 8,469,300 | | | |
Telesat Canada/Telesat, LLC, Sr. Sub. Notes, 12.50%, 11/1/17 | | | 4,060 | | | | 4,471,075 | | | |
Wind Acquisition Finance SA, Sr. Notes, 11.75%, 7/15/17(4) | | | 3,060 | | | | 3,473,100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 47,291,039 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Textiles / Apparel — 1.3% |
|
Levi Strauss & Co., Sr. Notes, 8.875%, 4/1/16 | | $ | 265 | | | $ | 271,625 | | | |
Levi Strauss & Co., Sr. Notes, 9.75%, 1/15/15 | | | 810 | | | | 850,500 | | | |
Oxford Industries, Inc., Sr. Notes, 11.375%, 7/15/15 | | | 1,945 | | | | 2,100,600 | | | |
Perry Ellis International, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes, 8.875%, 9/15/13 | | | 3,710 | | | | 3,607,975 | | | |
Quiksilver, Inc., 6.875%, 4/15/15 | | | 2,700 | | | | 2,099,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,929,950 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Transportation Ex Air / Rail — 0.6% |
|
CEVA Group, PLC, Sr. Notes, 10.00%, 9/1/14(4) | | $ | 3,825 | | | $ | 3,595,500 | | | |
CEVA Group, PLC, Sr. Notes, 11.625%, 10/1/16(4) | | | 880 | | | | 897,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,493,100 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Utilities — 2.4% |
|
AES Eastern Energy, Series 99-A, 9.00%, 1/2/17 | | $ | 2,102 | | | $ | 2,060,074 | | | |
Calpine Construction Finance Co., Sr. Notes, 8.00%, 6/1/16(4) | | | 3,315 | | | | 3,381,300 | | | |
Dynegy Holdings, Inc., Sr. Notes, 8.375%, 5/1/16 | | | 570 | | | | 534,375 | | | |
Edison Mission Energy, Sr. Notes, 7.00%, 5/15/17 | | | 575 | | | | 467,187 | | | |
Edison Mission Energy, Sr. Notes, 7.20%, 5/15/19 | | | 790 | | | | 633,975 | | | |
NGC Corp., 7.625%, 10/15/26 | | | 3,205 | | | | 2,195,425 | | | |
See notes to financial statements23
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Utilities (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
NRG Energy, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.375%, 2/1/16 | | $ | 7,135 | | | $ | 7,108,244 | | | |
Reliant Energy, Inc., Sr. Notes, 7.625%, 6/15/14 | | | 370 | | | | 362,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 16,743,180 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes | | |
(identified cost $655,241,451) | | $ | 622,319,430 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Convertible Bonds — 1.5% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Cable / Satellite TV — 1.1% |
|
Virgin Media, Inc., 6.50%, 11/15/16(4) | | $ | 7,310 | | | $ | 7,766,875 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,766,875 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care — 0.1% |
|
LifePoint Hospitals, Inc., 3.25%, 8/15/25 | | $ | 525 | | | $ | 472,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 472,500 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Services — 0.1% |
|
Gaylord Entertainment Co., 3.75%, 10/1/14(4) | | $ | 1,355 | | | $ | 1,183,931 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,183,931 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Technology — 0.2% |
|
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., 6.00%, 5/1/15 | | $ | 1,660 | | | $ | 1,215,950 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,215,950 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Convertible Bonds | | |
(identified cost $7,630,025) | | $ | 10,639,256 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 2.7% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Consumer Products — 0.0% |
|
HF Holdings, Inc.(5)(6) | | | 13,600 | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
|
Gaming — 0.0% |
|
Fontainebleau Equity Holdings, Class A(5)(7) | | | 148,726 | | | $ | 1,487 | | | |
Shreveport Gaming Holdings, Inc.(5) | | | 4,858 | | | | 87,444 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 88,931 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Services — 0.9% |
|
Geo Group, Inc. (The)(6) | | | 300,000 | | | $ | 6,345,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,345,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Super Retail — 1.2% |
|
GameStop Corp., Class A(6) | | | 300,000 | | | $ | 7,287,000 | | | |
GNC Acquisition Holdings, Class A(5)(6)(7) | | | 108,818 | | | | 1,280,788 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,567,788 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Technology — 0.6% |
|
Amkor Technology, Inc.(6) | | | 800,000 | | | $ | 4,408,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,408,000 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $22,467,669) | | $ | 19,409,719 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Convertible Preferred Stocks — 0.7% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Energy — 0.7% |
|
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 4.50% | | | 53,543 | | | $ | 4,069,268 | | | |
Chesapeake Energy Corp., 5.00%(4) | | | 6,292 | | | | 525,382 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,594,650 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Convertible Preferred Stocks | | |
(identified cost $5,951,414) | | $ | 4,594,650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred Stocks — 0.0% |
|
Security | | Shares/Units | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Gaming — 0.0% |
|
Fontainebleau Resorts LLC (PIK)(5)(7) | | | 4,544 | | | $ | 45 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 45 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements24
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares/Units | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Super Retail — 0.0% |
|
GNC Acquisition Holdings(5)(6)(7) | | | 37,182 | | | $ | 224,951 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 224,951 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Preferred Stocks | | |
(identified cost $4,730,370) | | $ | 224,996 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Miscellaneous — 0.1% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Cable / Satellite TV — 0.1% |
|
Adelphia, Inc., Escrow Certificate(6) | | | 3,555,000 | | | $ | 124,425 | | | |
Adelphia, Inc., Escrow Certificate(6) | | | 7,585,000 | | | | 265,475 | | | |
Adelphia Recovery Trust(6) | | | 10,758,837 | | | | 309,317 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 699,217 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy — 0.0% |
|
VeraSun Energy Corp., Escrow Certificate(5)(6) | | | 1,240,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Utilities — 0.0% |
|
Mirant Corp., Escrow Certificate(5)(6)(7) | | | 1,440,000 | | | $ | 144 | | | |
Mirant Corp., Escrow Certificate(5)(6)(7) | | | 3,200,000 | | | | 320 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 464 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Miscellaneous | | |
(identified cost $9,900,030) | | $ | 699,681 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants — 0.4% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Gaming — 0.4% |
|
Peninsula Gaming LLC, Convertible Preferred Membership Interests(5)(6)(7) | | | 25,351 | | | $ | 2,466,672 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,466,672 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Warrants (identified cost $0) | | $ | 2,466,672 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 0.0% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s Omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(8) | | $ | 11 | | | $ | 10,506 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $10,506) | | $ | 10,506 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 100.6% | | |
(identified cost $768,134,454) | | $ | 715,283,383 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets — (0.6)% | | $ | (4,427,293 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 710,856,090 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
DIP - Debtor in Possession
PIK - Payment In Kind
| | |
(1) | | Senior floating-rate interests (Senior Loans) often require prepayments from excess cash flows or permit the borrowers to repay at their election. The degree to which borrowers repay, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, cannot be predicted with accuracy. As a result, the actual remaining maturity may be substantially less than the stated maturities shown. However, Senior Loans will have an expected average life of approximately two to four years. The stated interest rate represents the weighted average interest rate of all contracts within the senior loan facility and includes commitment fees on unfunded loan commitments, if any. Senior Loans typically have rates of interest which are redetermined either daily, monthly, quarterly or semi-annually by reference to a base lending rate, plus a premium. These base rates are primarily the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and secondarily, the prime rate offered by one or more major United States banks (the “Prime Rate”) and the certificate of deposit (“CD”) rate or other base lending rates used by commercial lenders. |
|
(2) | | This Senior Loan will settle after October 31, 2009, at which time the interest rate will be determined. |
|
(3) | | Defaulted security. Currently the issuer is in default with respect to interest and/or principal payments. |
|
(4) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $240,181,440 or 33.8% of the Portfolio’s net assets. |
|
(5) | | Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees. |
|
(6) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(7) | | Restricted security (see Note 5). |
|
(8) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
|
(9) | | Defaulted matured security. |
See notes to financial statements25
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $768,123,948) | | $ | 715,272,877 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $10,506) | | | 10,506 | | | |
Cash | | | 1,568,889 | | | |
Restricted cash* | | | 29,000 | | | |
Interest and dividends receivable | | | 17,463,850 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 6,605,735 | | | |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | | 735,289 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 741,686,146 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Demand note payable | | $ | 18,300,000 | | | |
Payable for investments purchased | | | 11,343,097 | | | |
Premium received on open swap contracts | | | 616,716 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 367,261 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 2,088 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 200,894 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 30,830,056 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 710,856,090 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 762,971,872 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | | (52,115,782 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 710,856,090 | | | |
|
|
| |
* | Represents restricted cash on deposit at the custodian as collateral for open swap contracts. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest and other income | | $ | 65,548,462 | | | |
Dividends | | | 329,793 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 17,867 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (12,178 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 65,883,944 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 3,779,934 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 22,284 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 241,800 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 105,207 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 97,481 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 28,800 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 4,275,506 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 8 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 8 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 4,275,498 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 61,608,446 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (33,610,111 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (19,157,158 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | 77,718 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (52,689,551 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 182,149,672 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | 8,217,540 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (41,814 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 190,325,398 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 137,635,847 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 199,244,293 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements26
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 61,608,446 | | | $ | 66,895,970 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (52,689,551 | ) | | | (39,314,060 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, swap contracts, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 190,325,398 | | | | (233,768,789 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 199,244,293 | | | $ | (206,186,879 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 138,360,690 | | | $ | 93,764,788 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (106,809,974 | ) | | | (279,784,438 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | 31,550,716 | | | $ | (186,019,650 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 230,795,009 | | | $ | (392,206,529 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 480,061,081 | | | $ | 872,267,610 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 710,856,090 | | | $ | 480,061,081 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements27
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1) | | | 0.79 | % | | | 0.70 | % | | | 0.63 | % | | | 0.59 | % | | | 0.58 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 11.34 | % | | | 9.38 | % | | | 8.33 | % | | | 8.13 | % | | | 8.06 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 72 | % | | | 48 | % | | | 81 | % | | | 62 | % | | | 62 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 38.97 | % | | | (29.08 | )% | | | 6.54 | % | | | 11.66 | % | | | 6.54 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 710,856 | | | $ | 480,061 | | | $ | 872,268 | | | $ | 1,087,324 | | | $ | 1,110,139 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements28
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
High Income Opportunities Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to provide a high level of current income. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund, Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund and Eaton Vance Medallion Strategic Income Fund held an interest of 60.5%, 8.8%, 18.4% and 2.1%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Interests in senior floating-rate loans (Senior Loans) for which reliable market quotations are readily available are valued generally at the average mean of bid and ask quotations obtained from a third party pricing service. Other Senior Loans are valued at fair value by the investment adviser under procedures approved by the Trustees. In fair valuing a Senior Loan, the investment adviser utilizes one or more of the valuation techniques described in (i) through (iii) below to assess the likelihood that the borrower will make a full repayment of the loan underlying such Senior Loan relative to yields on other Senior Loans issued by companies of comparable credit quality. If the investment adviser believes that there is a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using a matrix pricing approach that considers the yield on the Senior Loan. If the investment adviser believes there is not a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using analyses that include, but are not limited to: (i) a comparison of the value of the borrower’s outstanding equity and debt to that of comparable public companies; (ii) a discounted cash flow analysis; or (iii) when the investment adviser believes it is likely that a borrower will be liquidated or sold, an analysis of the terms of such liquidation or sale. In certain cases, the investment adviser will use a combination of analytical methods to determine fair value, such as when only a portion of a borrower’s assets are likely to be sold. In conducting its assessment and analyses for purposes of determining fair value of a Senior Loan, the investment adviser will use its discretion and judgment in considering and appraising relevant factors. Fair value determinations are made by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio based on information available to such managers. The portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may not possess the same information about a Senior Loan borrower as the portfolio managers of the Portfolio. At times, the fair value of a Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may vary from the fair value of the same Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio. The fair value of each Senior Loan is periodically reviewed and approved by the investment adviser’s Valuation Committee and by the Trustees based upon procedures approved by the Trustees. Junior Loans are valued in the same manner as Senior Loans. Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Credit default swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. The pricing services employ electronic data processing techniques to determine the present value based on credit spread quotations obtained from broker/dealers and expected default recovery rates determined by the pricing service using proprietary models. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by
29
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities in the same manner as debt obligations described above.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount. Fees associated with loan amendments are recognized immediately. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
30
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
H Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
I Credit Default Swaps — When the Portfolio is the buyer of a credit default swap contract, the Portfolio is entitled to receive the par (or other agreed-upon) value of a referenced debt obligation (or basket of debt obligations) from the counterparty to the contract if a credit event by a third party, such as a U.S. or foreign corporate issuer, on the debt obligation occurs. In return, the Portfolio pays the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no credit event has occurred. If no credit event occurs, the Portfolio would have spent the stream of payments and received no benefits from the contract. When the Portfolio is the seller of a credit default swap contract, it receives the stream of payments, but is obligated to pay to the buyer of the protection an amount up to the notional amount of the swap and in certain instances take delivery of securities of the reference entity upon the occurrence of a credit event, as defined under the terms of that particular swap agreement. Credit events are contract specific but may include bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration and repudiation/moratorium. If the Portfolio is the seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Portfolio could be required to make would be an amount equal to the notional amount of the agreement. This potential amount would be partially offset by any recovery value of the respective referenced obligation, or net amount received from the settlement of a buy protection credit default swap agreement entered into by the Portfolio for the same referenced obligation. As the seller, the Portfolio effectively adds leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, the Portfolio is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. The interest fee paid or received on the swap contract, which is based on a specified interest rate on a fixed notional amount, is accrued daily as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and is recorded as realized gain upon receipt or realized loss upon payment. The Portfolio also records an increase or decrease to unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in an amount equal to the daily valuation. Upfront payments or receipts, if any, are recorded as other assets or other liabilities, respectively, and amortized over the life of the swap contract as realized gains or losses. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to the notional amount of the credit default swaps of which it is the seller. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to any unrealized depreciation of the credit default swaps of which it is the buyer, marked to market on a daily basis. These transactions involve certain risks, including the risk that the seller may be unable to fulfill the transaction.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.30% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million, 0.275% from $500 million up to $1 billion and at reduced rates on daily net assets of $1 billion or more; plus 3.00% of the Portfolio’s daily gross income (i.e., income other than gains from the sale of securities) when daily net assets are less than $500 million, 2.75% when daily net assets are $500 million but less than $1 billion, and at reduced rates on daily net assets of $1 billion or more, and is payable monthly. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $3,791,593 of which $11,659 was allocated from Cash Management and $3,779,934 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.70% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
31
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations and including maturities, paydowns and principal repayments on Senior Loans, aggregated $473,903,087 and $390,306,136, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 773,952,623 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 59,690,508 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (118,359,748 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (58,669,240 | ) | | |
|
|
5 Restricted Securities
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio owned the following securities (representing 0.6% of net assets) which were restricted as to public resale and not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (excluding Rule 144A securities). The Portfolio has various registration rights (exercisable under a variety of circumstances) with respect to these securities. The value of these securities is determined based on valuations provided by brokers when available, or if not available, they are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Date of
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Acquisition | | | Shares/Units | | | Cost | | | Value | | | |
|
Stocks, Miscellaneous, and Warrants |
|
GNC Acquisition Holdings, Class A | | | 3/15/07 | | | | 108,818 | | | $ | 544,090 | | | $ | 1,280,788 | | | |
GNC Acquisition Holdings, Preferred | | | 3/15/07 | | | | 37,182 | | | | 185,910 | | | | 224,951 | | | |
Fontainebleau Equity Holdings, Class A | | | 6/1/07 | | | | 148,726 | | | | 1,784,712 | | | | 1,487 | | | |
Fontainebleau Resorts LLC (PIK), Preferred | | | 6/1/07 | | | | 4,544 | | | | 4,544,460 | | | | 45 | | | |
Mirant Corp., Escrow Certificate | | | 1/5/06 | | | | 1,440,000 | | | | 0(1 | ) | | | 144 | | | |
Mirant Corp., Escrow Certificate | | | 1/5/06 | | | | 3,200,000 | | | | 0(1 | ) | | | 320 | | | |
Peninsula Gaming LLC, Convertible Preferred Membership Interests | | | 7/8/99 | | | | 25,351 | | | | 0(1 | ) | | | 2,466,672 | | | |
|
|
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | | | | | $ | 7,059,172 | | | $ | 3,974,407 | | | |
|
|
6 Financial Instruments
The Portfolio may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include swap contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Portfolio has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at October 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swaps — Sell Protection | |
| |
| | | | | | Notional
| | Receive
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Amount**
| | Annual
| | | | Net
| |
| | Reference
| | Credit
| | (000’s
| | Fixed
| | Termination
| | Unrealized
| |
Counterparty | | Entity | | Rating* | | omitted) | | Rate | | Date | | Appreciation | |
| |
Bank of America | | First Data Corp. | | Caa1/B- | | $ | 1,525 | | 3.20% | | 12/20/09 | | $ | 3,805 | |
Bank of America | | Ford Motor Credit Co. | | Caa1/CCC+ | | | 3,200 | | 5.00(1) | | 3/20/10 | | | 176,768 | |
Citigroup, Inc. | | First Data Corp. | | Caa1/B- | | | 3,050 | | 3.20 | | 12/20/09 | | | 7,610 | |
Citigroup, Inc. | | First Data Corp. | | Caa1/B- | | | 3,050 | | 3.55 | | 12/20/09 | | | 10,331 | |
Citigroup, Inc. | | First Data Corp. | | Caa1/B- | | | 4,560 | | 5.00(1) | | 12/20/10 | | | 536,775 | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 735,289 | |
|
|
| | |
| | |
* | | Credit ratings are those of Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor’s Corp. The credit ratings of the reference debt obligation (together with the unrealized appreciation or depreciation on the swap) are a representative measure of the current payment/performance risk of the credit default swap. A lower credit rating increases the probability of the occurrence of a credit event. |
|
** | | If the Portfolio is the seller of credit protection, the notional amount is the maximum potential amount of future payments the Portfolio could be required to make if a credit event, as defined in the credit default swap agreement, were to occur. At October 31, 2009, such maximum potential amount for all open credit default swaps in which the Portfolio is the seller was $15,385,000. |
|
(1) | | Upfront payment is exchanged with the counterparty as a result of the standardized trading coupon. |
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures
32
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815-10), effective May 1, 2009. Such standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. The disclosure below includes additional information as a result of implementing FAS 161.
The Portfolio is subject to credit risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. The Portfolio may enter into credit default swap contracts to manage its credit risk, to gain exposure to a credit in which it may otherwise invest, or to enhance return.
The Portfolio enters into swap contracts that may contain provisions whereby the counterparty may terminate the contract under certain conditions, including but not limited to a decline in the Portfolio’s net assets below a certain level over a certain period of time, which would trigger a payment by the Portfolio for those swaps in a liability position. At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio held no derivatives with credit-related contingent features in a net liability position.
The non-exchange traded derivatives in which the Portfolio invests, including swap contracts, are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the contract fails to perform its obligations under the contract. At October 31, 2009, the maximum amount of loss the Portfolio would incur due to counterparty risk was $735,289, representing the fair value of such derivatives in an asset position. Such amount would be reduced by any unamortized upfront payments received by the Portfolio.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is credit risk at October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value |
Derivative | | Asset Derivative(1) | | | Liability Derivative | | | |
|
Credit default swap contracts | | $ | 735,289 | | | $ | — | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Receivable for open swap contracts; Net unrealized depreciation. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is credit risk for the six months ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Change in
| | | |
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | Realized Gain
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
| | (Loss) on
| | | (Depreciation) on
| | | |
| | Derivatives
| | | Derivatives
| | | |
| | Recognized in
| | | Recognized in
| | | |
Derivative | | Income(1) | | | Income(2) | | | |
|
Credit default swap contracts | | $ | 742,275 | | | $ | 589,456 | | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Swap contracts. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Swap contracts. |
The average notional amount of credit default swap contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009, which is indicative of the volume of this derivative type, was $15,385,000.
7 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. At October 31, 2009, the Fund had a balance outstanding pursuant to this line of credit of $18,300,000 at an interest rate of 1.36%. Based on the short-term nature of the borrowings under the line of credit and variable interest rate, the carrying value of the borrowings approximated its fair value at October 31, 2009. Average borrowings and the average interest rate for the year ended October 31, 2009 were $9,170,959 and 1.07%, respectively.
8 Concentration of Credit Risk
The Portfolio regularly invests in lower rated and comparable quality unrated high yield securities. These investments have different risks than investments in debt securities rated investment grade and held by the Portfolio. Risk of loss upon default by the borrower is significantly greater with respect to such debt than with other debt securities because these securities are generally unsecured and are more sensitive to adverse economic conditions, such as recession or increasing interest rates, than are investment grade issuers.
9 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier
33
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Priced in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Senior Floating-Rate Interests | | $ | — | | | $ | 54,918,473 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 54,918,473 | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes | | | — | | | | 621,698,052 | | | | 621,378 | | | | 622,319,430 | | | |
Convertible Bonds | | | — | | | | 10,639,256 | | | | — | | | | 10,639,256 | | | |
Common Stocks | | | 18,040,000 | | | | — | | | | 1,369,719 | | | | 19,409,719 | | | |
Convertible Preferred Stocks | | | 4,069,268 | | | | 525,382 | | | | — | | | | 4,594,650 | | | |
Preferred Stocks | | | — | | | | — | | | | 224,996 | | | | 224,996 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | — | | | | 699,217 | | | | 464 | | | | 699,681 | | | |
Warrants | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,466,672 | | | | 2,466,672 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 10,506 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 10,506 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 22,119,774 | | | $ | 688,480,380 | | | $ | 4,683,229 | | | $ | 715,283,383 | | | |
|
|
Credit Default Swaps | | $ | — | | | $ | 735,289 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 735,289 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 22,119,774 | | | $ | 689,215,669 | | | $ | 4,683,229 | | | $ | 716,018,672 | | | |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investments
| | | Investments
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | in Senior
| | | in Corporate
| | | Investments
| | | Investments
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Floating-Rate
| | | Bonds &
| | | in Common
| | | in Preferred
| | | Investments
| | | Investments in
| | | | | | |
| | Interests | | | Notes | | | Stocks | | | Stocks | | | in Warrants | | | Miscellaneous | | | Total | | | |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 | | $ | 56,273 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,806,319 | | | $ | 1,174,741 | | | $ | 2,466,672 | | | $ | 464 | | | $ | 5,504,469 | | | |
Realized gains (losses) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)* | | | — | | | | (2,268,326 | ) | | | (436,600 | ) | | | (1,475,725 | ) | | | 730,314 | | | | (1,372 | ) | | | (3,451,709 | ) | | |
Net purchases (sales) | | | (56,273 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 525,980 | | | | (730,314 | ) | | | 1,372 | | | | (259,235 | ) | | |
Accrued discount (premium) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Net transfers to (from) Level 3 | | | — | | | | 2,889,704 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,889,704 | | | |
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 | | $ | — | | | $ | 621,378 | | | $ | 1,369,719 | | | $ | 224,996 | | | $ | 2,466,672 | | | $ | 464 | | | $ | 4,683,229 | | | |
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments still held as of October 31, 2009* | | $ | — | | | $ | (2,268,326 | ) | | $ | (436,600 | ) | | $ | (1,475,725 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,372 | ) | | $ | (4,182,023 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount is included in the related amount on investments in the Statement of Operations. |
10 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 23, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
34
High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
High Income Opportunities Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of High Income Opportunities Portfolio (“the Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities and senior loans owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and selling or agent banks; where replies were not received from brokers and selling or agent banks, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of High Income Opportunities Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 23, 2009
35
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
36
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of High Income Opportunities Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), the portfolio in which Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund (the “Fund”) invests, with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including the fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio. In particular, the Board evaluated the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing special considerations relevant to investing in high-yield debt. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the
37
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one- and three-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. On the basis of the foregoing and other relevant information, the Board concluded that, under the circumstances, the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund, the Portfolio and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund and the Portfolio.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
38
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and High Income Opportunities Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
39
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Since 1998 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas P. Huggins 3/7/66 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2000 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 4 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
40
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael W. Weilheimer 2/11/61 | | President of the Portfolio | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 24 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge by calling 1-800-262-1122.
41
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of High Income Opportunities Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Administrator of Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Principal Underwriter*
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer Agent
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Annual Report October 31, 2009 EATON VANCE INTERNATIONAL EQUITY FUND |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e. fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
Edward R. Allen, III, CFA
Eagle Global Advisors
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | International equity markets experienced a dramatic turnaround during the 12 months ending October 31, 2009. As the period began late last fall, global equities were already in the midst of a dramatic free fall, dragged lower by the failure or near-collapse of several major financial institutions struggling under the enormous weight of troubled assets. On the verge of illiquidity, the credit markets virtually ceased operating, worldwide economic activity ground to a near standstill, and anxious equity investors stayed on the sidelines. At the beginning of the second quarter, however, equity markets began a rally in response to indications that the concerted global effort by world banks to alleviate the credit crisis and stimulate economic growth was succeeding. The volatile period finished on a decidedly positive note, with many market indexes for European, U.S. and Asian equities posting solid annual gains. |
Thomas N. Hunt, III, CFA
Eagle Global Advisors
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | Although economic conditions across much of the world remained challenging at period end, signs continued to accumulate for an improvement in outlook. Recently, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) raised its forecasts for world growth for the remainder of 2009 and into 2010. The countries of continental Europe, particularly France and Germany, were poised for positive growth and indicators of business sentiment have been rising. The United Kingdom, assisted by an expansive monetary policy by the Bank of England and a sharply depreciated currency, continued to show signs of economic stabilization. Japan, where the strong yen has been complicating the country’s rebound by discouraging its exports, recently elected the Democratic Party of Japan (DJP) political party to power, ending decades of long dominance of the Liberal Democratic Party in politics. It remains to be seen what changes the DJP will push and whether those changes will be positive from an economic standpoint. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Management Discussion
• | | Against this backdrop, the Fund1 underperformed its benchmark, the MSCI Europe, Australasia, Far East Index (the MSCI EAFE Index) for the year ending October 31, 2009.2 The initial phase of the 2009 bull market was largely driven by the return of risk appetite — investors looking to capitalize on lower-quality companies, including those under financial stress, resulting in a boost for small-cap stocks. The Fund’s lack of exposure to these low-quality stocks, as well as its large-cap focus, led to its underperformance early in the rally. Overall, positive stock selection led to Fund returns more closely tracking the MSCI EAFE Index since April, although not enough to offset underperformance in March and April. |
|
• | | The materials sector was the biggest factor in the Fund’s relative underperformance for the year. Most of the shortfall in the sector was due to stock selection in the metals & mining industry. Financials was also a significant detractor from performance. The sector accounted for approximately one quarter of the MSCI EAFE Index’s weight and contributed the most to its returns. However, the Fund was underweighted in the sector all year, which hurt performance. Stock selection also detracted, especially the Fund’s investments in the consumer finance industry. An overweighting to health care further dampened the Fund’s performance relative to the MSCI EAFE Index. Conversely, the Fund’s stock selection in the energy sector added to relative returns. |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08 – 10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A3 | | | 18.47 | % |
Class C3 | | | 17.57 | |
Class I3 | | | 18.48 | |
MSCI EAFE Index2 | | | 27.71 | |
Lipper International Large-Cap Core Funds Average2 | | | 23.97 | |
See page 3 for more performance information.
| | |
1 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, International Equity Portfolio, with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
2 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index returns reflect dividends net of any applicable foreign withholding taxes. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. Class A and Class I shares are subject to a 1.00% redemption fee if redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of settlement of purchase. Absent an allocation of certain expenses to the investment adviser and sub-adviser of the Portfolio and the administrator of the Fund, the returns would be lower. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
1
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | Despite the second half rally elsewhere in the world, Japan was the worst performing market for the year (performance based on U.S. dollars). The Fund was underweighted in Japanese stocks, which aided its performance, as all Japanese sectors did poorly, underperforming the overall MSCI EAFE Index. |
|
• | | Emerging markets enjoyed a strong year, with some economies proving more resilient to the financial crisis and global recession than anticipated. Asian economies, mostly led by global trade, were poised to improve in the second half of 2009. In Latin America, Mexico seemed likely to track the U.S. in an economic recovery, while Brazil proved more resilient to external shocks. After an initial paring back late in 2008, the Fund’s weighting in emerging markets increased over the year, which — along with stock selection — was a big contributor to performance. |
|
• | | Our investment philosophy and process remain consistent: investing in a diversified portfolio of foreign equity securities with favorable growth prospects, competitive positions and strong balance sheets. As we have experienced in prior recoveries, we believe market leadership will continue to rotate from high-risk, low-quality companies to high-quality companies that can deliver revenue growth as the economic recovery matures. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
Global Allocation1
By net assets
Europe 58.9% Continental Europe 41.9% U.K. 17.0% Emerging Markets 19.3% Europe/Africa/Asia 11.0% Latin America 8.3% Asia-Pacific 16.9% Japan 9.8% Other 7.1% North America 2.4% Africa/Other 0.7% |
| | |
1 | | As a percentage of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
Top 10 Holdings2
By net assets
| | | | |
Banco Santander Central Hispano SA ADR | | | 3.9 | % |
Nestle SA ADR | | | 3.2 | |
Novartis AG ADR | | | 3.1 | |
Total SA ADR | | | 3.0 | |
British American Tobacco PLC ADR | | | 3.0 | |
Mitsui & Co., Ltd. | | | 2.6 | |
Petroleo Brasileiro SA ADR | | | 2.5 | |
DBS Group Holdings, Ltd. ADR | | | 2.5 | |
Unilever PLC | | | 2.3 | |
BOC Hong Kong Holdings, Ltd. | | | 2.3 | |
| | |
2 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 28.4% of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
2
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the MSCI EAFE Index, a broad-based, unmanaged market index of international stocks. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A and the Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
Comparison of Change in Value of a $10,000 Investment in Eaton Vance International Equity Fund, Class A vs. the MSCI EAFE Index* |
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 5/31/06. |
|
| | A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class C and Class I shares on 5/31/06 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $8,567 and $8,843, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index returns reflect dividends net of any applicable foreign witholding taxes. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EAIEX | | ECIEX | | EIIEX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 18.47 | % | | | 17.57 | % | | | 18.48 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | -3.69 | | | | -4.42 | | | | -3.53 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 11.70 | % | | | 16.57 | % | | | 18.48 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | -5.34 | | | | -4.42 | | | | -3.53 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates — Class A, Class C and Class I: 5/31/06 |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. Class A and Class I shares are subject to a 1.00% redemption fee if redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of settlement of purchase. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Absent an allocation of certain expenses to the investment adviser and sub-adviser of the Portfolio and the administrator of the Fund, the returns would be lower. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Gross Expense Ratio | | | 2.06 | % | | | 2.81 | % | | | 1.81 | % |
Net Expense Ratio | | | 1.50 | | | | 2.25 | | | | 1.25 | |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. The net expense ratio reflects a contractual expense limitation that continues through February 28, 2010. Thereafter, the expense limitation may be changed or terminated at any time. Without this expense limitation, expenses would be higher. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,314.60 | | | | $8.75 | ** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,309.70 | | | | $13.10 | ** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,314.20 | | | | $7.29 | ** | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.60 | | | | $7.63 | ** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,013.90 | | | | $11.42 | ** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.90 | | | | $6.36 | ** | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.50% for Class A shares, 2.25% for Class C shares and 1.25% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
|
| ** | Absent an allocation of expenses to affiliates, expenses would be higher. | |
4
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in International Equity Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $18,965,046) | | $ | 19,945,216 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 1,292,675 | | | |
Receivable from affiliates | | | 26,923 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 21,264,814 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 8,677 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 3,125 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 39,622 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 51,466 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 21,213,348 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 29,023,531 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (9,141,217 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 350,864 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolio | | | 980,170 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 21,213,348 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 7,131,856 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 845,118 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.44 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 8.95 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 2,121,627 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 254,772 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.33 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 11,959,865 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 1,414,407 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.46 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends allocated from Portfolio (net of foreign taxes, $70,452) | | $ | 625,966 | | | |
Interest allocated from Portfolio | | | 8,207 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (221,862 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 412,311 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 12,860 | | | |
Class C | | | 16,747 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 18,889 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 21,020 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 21,676 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 20,932 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 44,783 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 11,945 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 169,352 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Allocation of expenses to affiliates | | $ | 139,893 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 139,893 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 29,459 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 382,852 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (6,017,403 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | (17,230 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (6,034,633 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 9,212,730 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 3,347 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 9,216,077 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 3,181,444 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 3,564,296 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 382,852 | | | $ | 411,119 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (6,034,633 | ) | | | (3,086,060 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 9,216,077 | | | | (11,096,418 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 3,564,296 | | | $ | (13,771,359 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (102,504 | ) | | $ | (109,757 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (16,956 | ) | | | (27,887 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (215,009 | ) | | | (190,286 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (334,469 | ) | | $ | (327,930 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 4,351,169 | | | $ | 8,307,641 | | | |
Class C | | | 1,473,441 | | | | 2,065,863 | | | |
Class I | | | 3,743,567 | | | | 11,776,779 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 89,161 | | | | 88,207 | | | |
Class C | | | 13,088 | | | | 18,103 | | | |
Class I | | | 121,258 | | | | 141,231 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (3,131,274 | ) | | | (3,189,006 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (1,015,594 | ) | | | (807,346 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (4,220,883 | ) | | | (2,861,556 | ) | | |
Redemption fees | | | 5,247 | | | | 2,522 | | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 1,429,180 | | | $ | 15,542,438 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 4,659,007 | | | $ | 1,443,149 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 16,554,341 | | | $ | 15,111,192 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 21,213,348 | | | $ | 16,554,341 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 350,864 | | | $ | 319,675 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.260 | | | $ | 14.200 | | | $ | 10.650 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income (loss)(2) | | $ | 0.136 | | | $ | 0.209 | | | $ | 0.468 | (3) | | $ | (0.003 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.177 | | | | (6.901 | ) | | | 3.119 | | | | 0.653 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.313 | | | $ | (6.692 | ) | | $ | 3.587 | | | $ | 0.650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.135 | ) | | $ | (0.249 | ) | | $ | (0.038 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.135 | ) | | $ | (0.249 | ) | | $ | (0.038 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(2) | | $ | 0.002 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.440 | | | $ | 7.260 | | | $ | 14.200 | | | $ | 10.650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(5) | | | 18.47 | % | | | (47.91 | )% | | | 33.78 | % | | | 6.50 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 7,132 | | | $ | 5,084 | | | $ | 4,124 | | | $ | 430 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction(7)(8) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.51 | %(9) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction(7)(8) | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | %(9) | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 1.92 | % | | | 1.80 | % | | | 3.82 | %(3) | | | (0.08 | )%(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 61 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 21 | % | | | 1 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, May 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Net investment income per share reflects a dividend resulting from a corporate action allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.342 per share. Excluding this dividend, the ratio of net investment income to average daily net assets would have been 1.02%. |
|
(4) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005. |
|
(5) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(6) | | Not annualized. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(8) | | The investment adviser of the Portfolio waived all or a portion of its investment adviser fee and the investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.85%, 0.56%, 1.17% and 19.97% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the period ended October 31, 2006, respectively). A portion of the waiver and subsidy was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. Absent the waiver and subsidy, total return would be lower. |
|
(9) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.160 | | | $ | 14.060 | | | $ | 10.620 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income (loss)(2) | | $ | 0.080 | | | $ | 0.130 | | | $ | 0.338 | (3) | | $ | (0.037 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.162 | | | | (6.829 | ) | | | 3.127 | | | | 0.657 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.242 | | | $ | (6.699 | ) | | $ | 3.465 | | | $ | 0.620 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.074 | ) | | $ | (0.202 | ) | | $ | (0.026 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.074 | ) | | $ | (0.202 | ) | | $ | (0.026 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(2) | | $ | 0.002 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.330 | | | $ | 7.160 | | | $ | 14.060 | | | $ | 10.620 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(5) | | | 17.57 | % | | | (48.33 | )% | | | 32.79 | % | | | 6.20 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 2,122 | | | $ | 1,350 | | | $ | 1,200 | | | $ | 170 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction(7)(8) | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.26 | %(9) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction(7)(8) | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.25 | %(9) | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 1.13 | % | | | 1.12 | % | | | 2.78 | %(3) | | | (0.87 | )%(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 61 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 21 | % | | | 1 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, May 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Net investment income per share reflects a dividend resulting from a corporate action allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.290 per share. Excluding this dividend, the ratio of net investment income to average daily net assets would have been 0.39%. |
|
(4) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005. |
|
(5) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(6) | | Not annualized. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(8) | | The investment adviser of the Portfolio waived all or a portion of its investment adviser fee and the investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.85%, 0.56%, 1.17% and 19.97% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the period ended October 31, 2006, respectively). A portion of the waiver and subsidy was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. Absent the waiver and subsidy, total return would be lower. |
|
(9) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.290 | | | $ | 14.240 | | | $ | 10.660 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.175 | | | $ | 0.246 | | | $ | 0.416 | (3) | | $ | 0.037 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.150 | | | | (6.934 | ) | | | 3.206 | | | | 0.623 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.325 | | | $ | (6.688 | ) | | $ | 3.622 | | | $ | 0.660 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.157 | ) | | $ | (0.263 | ) | | $ | (0.043 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.157 | ) | | $ | (0.263 | ) | | $ | (0.043 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(2) | | $ | 0.002 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.460 | | | $ | 7.290 | | | $ | 14.240 | | | $ | 10.660 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(5) | | | 18.48 | % | | | (47.79 | )% | | | 34.09 | % | | | 6.60 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 11,960 | | | $ | 10,120 | | | $ | 9,787 | | | $ | 2,726 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction(7)(8) | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.26 | %(9) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction(7)(8) | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | %(9) | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.44 | % | | | 2.12 | % | | | 3.43 | %(3) | | | 0.87 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 61 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 21 | % | | | 1 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, May 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Net investment income per share reflects a dividend resulting from a corporate action allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.241 per share. Excluding this dividend, the ratio of net investment income to average daily net assets would have been 1.44%. |
|
(4) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005. |
|
(5) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(6) | | Not annualized. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(8) | | The investment adviser of the Portfolio waived all or a portion of its investment adviser fee and the investment adviser and administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.85%, 0.56%, 1.17% and 19.97% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the period ended October 31, 2006, respectively). A portion of the waiver and subsidy was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. Absent the waiver and subsidy, total return would be lower. |
|
(9) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers three classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in International Equity Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (65.0% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $8,943,686 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2014 ($7,211), October 31, 2015 ($65,592), October 31, 2016 ($2,978,887) and October 31, 2017 ($5,891,996).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
10
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Redemption Fees — Upon the redemption or exchange of shares by Class A or Class I shareholders within 90 days of the settlement of purchase, a fee of 1% of the current net asset value of these shares will be assessed and retained by the Fund for the benefit of the remaining shareholders. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in capital.
I Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make at least one distribution annually (normally in December) of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 334,469 | | | $ | 327,930 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $17,228, accumulated undistributed net investment income was decreased by $17,194, and paid-in capital was decreased by $34 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss) and non-deductible expenses. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 350,864 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (8,943,686 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 782,639 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to partnership allocations.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
Eaton Vance Management (EVM) serves as the administrator to the Fund, but receives no compensation. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report. EVM and the sub-adviser of the Portfolio, Eagle Global Advisors, L.L.C. (Eagle), have agreed to reimburse the Fund’s operating expenses to the extent that they exceed 1.50%, 2.25% and 1.25% annually of the Fund’s average daily net assets for Class A, Class C and Class I, respectively. This agreement may be changed or terminated after February 28, 2010. Pursuant to this agreement, EVM and Eagle were allocated $69,947 and $69,946, respectively, of the Fund’s operating expenses for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $1,028 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $3,663 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the
11
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $12,860 for Class A shares. The Fund also has in effect a distribution plan for Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class C Plan requires the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of Class C, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $12,560 for Class C shares representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class C Plan was approximately $111,000. The Class C Plan also authorizes the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $4,187 for Class C shares.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) of 1% generally is imposed on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class C Plan. CDSCs received on Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $500 and $2,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $7,660,872 and $7,889,773, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 591,541 | | | | 695,292 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 12,576 | | | | 6,687 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (459,187 | ) | | | (292,160 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 144,930 | | | | 409,819 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 212,921 | | | | 179,367 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,859 | | | | 1,384 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (148,630 | ) | | | (77,476 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 66,150 | | | | 103,275 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
12
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class I | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 548,241 | | | | 971,438 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 17,103 | | | | 10,691 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (540,126 | ) | | | (280,327 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 25,218 | | | | 701,802 | | | |
|
|
For the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the Fund received $5,247 and $2,522, respectively, in redemption fees.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 16, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
13
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and the Shareholders of Eaton Vance
International Equity Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance International Equity Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust), as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, May 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, May 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 16, 2009
14
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of qualified dividend income for individuals and the foreign tax credit.
Qualified Dividend Income. The Fund designates $668,321 or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
Foreign Tax Credit. The Fund designates a foreign tax credit of $70,452 and recognizes foreign source income of $696,418.
15
International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 98.2% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Automobiles — 2.7% |
|
Fiat SpA(1) | | | 9,800 | | | $ | 145,900 | | | |
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. ADR | | | 10,600 | | | | 328,282 | | | |
Toyota Motor Corp. | | | 8,800 | | | | 347,397 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 821,579 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverages — 3.3% |
|
Central European Distribution Corp.(1) | | | 13,800 | | | $ | 429,318 | | | |
Fomento Economico Mexicano SA de CV ADR | | | 13,500 | | | | 584,685 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,014,003 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building Products — 1.3% |
|
Wienerberger AG(1) | | | 22,120 | | | $ | 399,590 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 399,590 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets — 0.4% |
|
3i Group PLC | | | 32,000 | | | $ | 137,733 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 137,733 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 1.5% |
|
Agrium, Inc. | | | 9,550 | | | $ | 448,373 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 448,373 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 19.0% |
|
Banco Santander Central Hispano SA ADR | | | 75,100 | | | $ | 1,206,106 | | | |
Barclays PLC(1) | | | 125,000 | | | | 655,133 | | | |
BOC Hong Kong Holdings, Ltd. | | | 303,000 | | | | 695,941 | | | |
Credit Agricole SA | | | 9,100 | | | | 174,312 | | | |
DBS Group Holdings, Ltd. ADR | | | 20,700 | | | | 755,757 | | | |
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA(1) | | | 152,000 | | | | 639,689 | | | |
KBC Groep NV(1) | | | 10,500 | | | | 449,472 | | | |
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | | | 38,000 | | | | 202,403 | | | |
National Bank of Greece SA(1) | | | 16,600 | | | | 606,902 | | | |
Societe Generale | | | 4,600 | | | | 305,532 | | | |
Turkiye Is Bankasi | | | 37,000 | | | | 140,131 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,831,378 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals — 0.7% |
|
Toshiba Corp.(1) | | | 39,000 | | | $ | 222,898 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 222,898 | | | |
|
|
|
Construction & Engineering — 0.8% |
|
Vinci SA | | | 4,800 | | | $ | 250,503 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 250,503 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance — 1.0% |
|
ORIX Corp. | | | 4,600 | | | $ | 297,136 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 297,136 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 5.0% |
|
France Telecom SA ADR | | | 20,200 | | | $ | 509,444 | | | |
Koninklijke KPN NV | | | 21,000 | | | | 380,914 | | | |
Telefonica SA | | | 22,600 | | | | 631,139 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,521,497 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 1.5% |
|
E.ON AG ADR | | | 12,000 | | | $ | 460,800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 460,800 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment — 1.3% |
|
ABB, Ltd. ADR | | | 22,000 | | | $ | 407,660 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 407,660 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components — 2.6% |
|
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp. | | | 17,000 | | | $ | 483,297 | | | |
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. | | | 80,500 | | | | 315,305 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 798,602 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services — 1.0% |
|
OAO TMK GDR | | | 16,600 | | | $ | 299,877 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 299,877 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 6.1% |
|
Cosan, Ltd., Class A(1) | | | 27,400 | | | $ | 182,484 | | | |
Nestle SA ADR | | | 20,800 | | | | 967,616 | | | |
Unilever PLC | | | 24,000 | | | | 717,018 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,867,118 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 0.5% |
|
Mindray Medical International, Ltd. ADR | | | 5,000 | | | $ | 153,650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 153,650 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements16
International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 1.0% |
|
Carnival PLC | | | 5,100 | | | $ | 158,106 | | | |
Melco Crown Entertainment, Ltd. ADR(1) | | | 27,800 | | | | 137,888 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 295,994 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Durables — 1.7% |
|
Desarrolladora Homex SA de CV ADR(1) | | | 10,200 | | | $ | 362,712 | | | |
Fisher & Paykel Appliances Holdings, Ltd. | | | 22,300 | | | | 10,561 | | | |
LG Electronics, Inc. | | | 1,600 | | | | 148,737 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 522,010 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Conglomerates — 3.1% |
|
Cookson Group PLC(1) | | | 61,000 | | | $ | 363,997 | | | |
Keppel, Ltd. ADR | | | 52,000 | | | | 602,160 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 966,157 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 4.7% |
|
Aegon NV(1) | | | 60,700 | | | $ | 431,422 | | | |
Aviva PLC | | | 24,000 | | | | 150,075 | | | |
AXA SA ADR | | | 23,300 | | | | 577,840 | | | |
Zurich Financial Services AG | | | 1,300 | | | | 297,690 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,457,027 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Media — 0.9% |
|
Central European Media Enterprises, Ltd., Class A(1) | | | 11,500 | | | $ | 289,110 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 289,110 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 7.4% |
|
Anglo American PLC ADR(1) | | | 18,163 | | | $ | 328,750 | | | |
ArcelorMittal | | | 8,000 | | | | 272,160 | | | |
Rio Tinto PLC ADR | | | 2,000 | | | | 356,060 | | | |
Sterlite Industries India, Ltd. ADR | | | 37,900 | | | | 597,683 | | | |
Thompson Creek Metals Co., Inc.(1) | | | 27,600 | | | | 280,968 | | | |
Vale SA ADR | | | 19,200 | | | | 443,520 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,279,141 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multi-Utilities — 2.9% |
|
National Grid PLC | | | 31,800 | | | $ | 315,006 | | | |
RWE AG ADR | | | 6,500 | | | | 570,050 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 885,056 | | | |
|
|
|
Multiline Retail — 0.5% |
|
Marks & Spencer Group PLC | | | 27,000 | | | $ | 151,223 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 151,223 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Office Electronics — 1.1% |
|
Canon, Inc. | | | 9,000 | | | $ | 339,325 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 339,325 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 9.4% |
|
KazMunaiGas Exploration Production GDR | | | 8,000 | | | $ | 188,700 | | | |
LUKOIL OAO ADR | | | 9,000 | | | | 525,600 | | | |
OMV AG | | | 3,600 | | | | 148,352 | | | |
Petroleo Brasileiro SA ADR | | | 19,200 | | | | 770,304 | | | |
StatoilHydro ASA ADR | | | 14,191 | | | | 335,759 | | | |
Total SA ADR | | | 15,400 | | | | 925,078 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,893,793 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals — 6.9% |
|
AstraZeneca PLC ADR | | | 5,400 | | | $ | 242,514 | | | |
GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR | | | 13,800 | | | | 568,008 | | | |
Novartis AG ADR | | | 18,500 | | | | 961,075 | | | |
Sanofi-Aventis | | | 4,500 | | | | 329,860 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,101,457 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Road & Rail — 0.6% |
|
All America Latina Logistica SA (Units) | | | 25,000 | | | $ | 184,349 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 184,349 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 0.5% |
|
United Microelectronics Corp. ADR(1) | | | 47,000 | | | $ | 154,630 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 154,630 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail — 0.5% |
|
Kingfisher PLC | | | 44,000 | | | $ | 160,825 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 160,825 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Tobacco — 3.0% |
|
British American Tobacco PLC ADR | | | 14,200 | | | $ | 912,066 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 912,066 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements17
International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Trading Companies & Distributors — 2.6% |
|
Mitsui & Co., Ltd. | | | 60,000 | | | $ | 787,976 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 787,976 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 2.7% |
|
MTN Group, Ltd. | | | 15,000 | | | $ | 223,339 | | | |
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ADR | | | 35,900 | | | | 589,837 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 813,176 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $28,165,014) | | $ | 30,125,712 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 0.2% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(2) | | $ | 59 | | | $ | 59,371 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $59,371) | | $ | 59,371 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 98.4% | | |
(identified cost $28,224,385) | | $ | 30,185,083 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 1.6% | | $ | 497,476 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 30,682,559 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
ADR - American Depositary Receipt
GDR - Global Depositary Receipt
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(2) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Country Concentration of Portfolio |
|
| | Percentage
| | | | | | |
Country | | of Net Assets | | | Value | | | |
|
|
United Kingdom | | | 17.0 | % | | $ | 5,216,514 | | | |
France | | | 10.0 | | | | 3,072,569 | | | |
Japan | | | 9.8 | | | | 3,008,714 | | | |
Switzerland | | | 8.6 | | | | 2,634,041 | | | |
Spain | | | 6.0 | | | | 1,837,245 | | | |
Brazil | | | 5.2 | | | | 1,580,657 | | | |
Singapore | | | 4.4 | | | | 1,357,917 | | | |
Netherlands | | | 3.5 | | | | 1,084,496 | | | |
Germany | | | 3.4 | | | | 1,030,850 | | | |
Mexico | | | 3.1 | | | | 947,397 | | | |
Hong Kong | | | 2.7 | | | | 833,829 | | | |
Russia | | | 2.7 | | | | 825,477 | | | |
Italy | | | 2.6 | | | | 785,589 | | | |
Turkey | | | 2.4 | | | | 729,968 | | | |
Canada | | | 2.4 | | | | 729,341 | | | |
Greece | | | 2.0 | | | | 606,902 | | | |
India | | | 1.9 | | | | 597,683 | | | |
Austria | | | 1.8 | | | | 547,942 | | | |
Taiwan | | | 1.5 | | | | 469,935 | | | |
Belgium | | | 1.5 | | | | 449,472 | | | |
Poland | | | 1.4 | | | | 429,318 | | | |
Norway | | | 1.1 | | | | 335,759 | | | |
Czech Republic | | | 0.9 | | | | 289,110 | | | |
South Africa | | | 0.7 | | | | 223,339 | | | |
Kazakhstan | | | 0.6 | | | | 188,700 | | | |
China | | | 0.5 | | | | 153,650 | | | |
South Korea | | | 0.5 | | | | 148,737 | | | |
United States | | | 0.2 | | | | 59,371 | | | |
New Zealand | | | 0.0 | | | | 10,561 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | | 98.4 | % | | $ | 30,185,083 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements18
International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $28,165,014) | | $ | 30,125,712 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $59,371) | | | 59,371 | | | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $1,232) | | | 1,248 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 495,004 | | | |
Dividends receivable | | | 54,122 | | | |
Tax reclaims receivable | | | 58,793 | | | |
Receivable from affiliates | | | 3,446 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 30,797,696 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 31,347 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 28,060 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 140 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 55,590 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 115,137 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 30,682,559 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 28,721,258 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 1,961,301 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 30,682,559 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends (net of foreign taxes, $102,861) | | $ | 952,675 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 11,817 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (6,344 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 958,148 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 262,468 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 1,652 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 39,261 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 39,699 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 2,636 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 345,716 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Waiver of investment adviser fee | | $ | 816 | | | |
Allocation of expenses to affiliates | | | 13,696 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 14,512 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 331,204 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 626,944 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (8,754,168 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | (26,118 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (8,780,286 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 13,454,353 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 4,003 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 13,458,356 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 4,678,070 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 5,305,014 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements19
International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 626,944 | | | $ | 714,443 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (8,780,286 | ) | | | (4,615,440 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 13,458,356 | | | | (17,358,270 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 5,305,014 | | | $ | (21,259,267 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 9,904,124 | | | $ | 28,239,659 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (10,031,643 | ) | | | (9,747,273 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | (127,519 | ) | | $ | 18,492,386 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 5,177,495 | | | $ | (2,766,881 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 25,505,064 | | | $ | 28,271,945 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 30,682,559 | | | $ | 25,505,064 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements20
International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction(2) | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 0.87 | % | | | 1.26 | %(3) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction(2) | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 0.87 | % | | | 1.25 | %(3) | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.33 | % | | | 2.10 | % | | | 3.72 | %(4) | | | 0.92 | %(3) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 61 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 21 | % | | | 1 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 18.47 | % | | | (47.77 | )% | | | 34.59 | % | | | 6.60 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 30,683 | | | $ | 25,505 | | | $ | 28,272 | | | $ | 10,874 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the commencement of investment operations, May 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | The investment adviser waived all or a portion of its investment adviser fee and/or subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.05%, 0.02%, 0.55% and 5.21% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the period ended October 31, 2006, respectively). A portion of the waiver and subsidy was borne by the sub-adviser. Absent this waiver and/or subsidy, total return would be lower. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | Includes a dividend resulting from a corporate action equal to 1.93% of average daily net assets. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements21
International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
International Equity Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to achieve total return by investing in a diversified portfolio of foreign equity securities. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, the Eaton Vance International Equity Fund and Eaton Vance Equity Asset Allocation Fund held an interest of 65.0% and 13.7%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities based on available market quotations provided by a third party pricing service.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
22
International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. However, if the ex-dividend date has passed, certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as the Portfolio is informed of the ex-dividend date. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends and capital gains have been provided for in accordance with the Portfolio’s understanding of the applicable countries’ tax rules and rates. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 1.00% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. Pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement, BMR pays Eagle Global Advisors, L.L.C. (Eagle) a portion of its adviser fee for sub-advisory services provided to the Portfolio. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $268,524 of which $6,056 was allocated from Cash Management and $262,468 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 1.00% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets. Pursuant to a voluntary
23
International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
expense reimbursement, BMR and Eagle were allocated $6,848 and $6,848, respectively, of the Portfolio’s operating expenses for the year ended October 31, 2009. BMR has also agreed to reduce the investment adviser fee by an amount equal to that portion of commissions paid to broker-dealers in execution of security transactions attributed to the Portfolio that is consideration for third-party research services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, BMR waived $816 of its adviser fee. Eagle, in turn, waived $816 of its sub-advisory fee.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $17,617,284 and $15,641,750, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 28,224,385 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 3,478,758 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (1,518,060 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 1,960,698 | | | |
|
|
The net unrealized appreciation on foreign currency at October 31, 2009 on federal income tax basis was $603.
5 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
6 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by companies whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Portfolio, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign securities markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
7 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
24
International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | |
| | | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | |
| |
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer Discretionary | | $ | 1,117,992 | | | $ | 1,122,748 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,240,740 | |
Consumer Staples | | | 3,076,169 | | | | 717,018 | | | | — | | | | 3,793,187 | |
Energy | | | 3,045,318 | | | | 148,352 | | | | — | | | | 3,193,670 | |
Financials | | | 2,539,703 | | | | 5,183,572 | | | | — | | | | 7,723,275 | |
Health Care | | | 1,925,247 | | | | 329,860 | | | | — | | | | 2,255,107 | |
Industrials | | | 1,009,820 | | | | 1,986,415 | | | | — | | | | 2,996,235 | |
Information Technology | | | 154,630 | | | | 1,360,826 | | | | — | | | | 1,515,456 | |
Materials | | | 2,727,514 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,727,514 | |
Telecommunication Services | | | 1,099,281 | | | | 1,235,391 | | | | — | | | | 2,334,672 | |
Utilities | | | 1,030,850 | | | | 315,006 | | | | — | | | | 1,345,856 | |
|
|
Total Common Stocks | | $ | 17,726,524 | | | $ | 12,399,188 | * | | $ | — | | | $ | 30,125,712 | |
|
|
Short-Term Investments | | $ | 59,371 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 59,371 | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 17,785,895 | | | $ | 12,399,188 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 30,185,083 | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Includes foreign equity securities whose values were adjusted to reflect market trading that occurred after the close of trading in their applicable foreign markets. |
The Portfolio held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 16, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
25
International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
International Equity Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of International Equity Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, May 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, May 31, 2006, to October 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 16, 2009
26
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
27
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement between International Equity Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), the portfolio in which Eaton Vance International Equity Fund (the “Fund”) invests, and Boston Management and Research (“BMR” or the “Adviser”) and the sub-advisory agreement with Eagle Global Advisors, L.L.C. (“Eagle” or the “Sub-adviser”), including the fee structure of each agreement, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement with BMR and sub-advisory agreement with Eagle for the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by BMR and by Eagle.
The Board considered BMR’s and Eagle’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio and who also supervise Eagle’s management of the Portfolio. The Board specifically noted BMR’s in-house equity research capabilities. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of BMR, relevant affiliates thereof, and Eagle. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of BMR and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by BMR and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following
28
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by BMR and Eagle, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement with respect to BMR, and consistent with the investment sub-advisory agreement with respect to Eagle.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-year period ended September 30, 2008. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Fund’s management fees and total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008. The Board considered the fact that the Adviser and the Sub-Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses for the Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by BMR, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by BMR and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund, the Portfolio and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by BMR and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by BMR and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund and the Portfolio, including the benefits of research services that may be available to BMR as a result of securities transactions effected for the Portfolio and other advisory clients. The Board also concluded that, in light of its role as a sub-adviser not affiliated with the Adviser, the Sub-adviser’s profitability in managing the Portfolio was not a material factor.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by BMR and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which BMR and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of BMR and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by BMR and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the Portfolio advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause BMR and its affiliates, Eagle, and the Fund and the Portfolio to continue to share such benefits equitably.
29
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and International Equity Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Eagle” refers to Eagle Global Advisors, L.L.C., “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Trustee of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Trustee of the Trust since 2003 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Trustee of the Trust since 2003 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
30
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Trustee of the Trust since 1998 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007, Trustee of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Edward R. Allen, III 7/5/60 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2006 | | Senior Partner of Eagle. Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas N. Hunt, III 11/6/64 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2006 | | Senior Partner of Eagle. Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Vice President of the Trust since 2001 and of the Portfolio since 2006 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
31
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
32
Investment Adviser of International Equity Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Sub-Adviser of International Equity PortfolioEagle Global Advisors, L.L.C.
5847 San Felipe, Suite 930
Houston, TX 77057
Administrator of Eaton Vance International Equity FundEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance International Equity FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
Mark S. Venezia, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | The year ending October 31, 2009, closed with economic data showing a modest rebound in global economic fundamentals. For the markets, this rebound was a welcome change after witnessing a freefall in world economic output for the first two quarters of this period, followed by a slowdown in the pace of economic deterioration in the subsequent quarter. As signs of improving economic fundamentals began to emerge, investors’ aversion to risk reversed course and the capital markets staged a comeback. |
|
• | | In the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers collapse in late 2008, with credit markets at a virtual standstill and global economic activity in decline, prices on riskier assets remained depressed. The last three months of 2008 were marked by the outperformance of U.S. government securities, relative to other asset classes, and a strong U.S. dollar, which were viewed as safe havens amidst the economic downturn. Credit markets, however, rallied sharply in the final two quarters of this twelve month period, and currencies in both developed and emerging markets rose against the dollar. |
|
• | | Amidst historic levels of central bank and government intervention, yield spreads across virtually all fixed income markets have tightened substantially, producing extraordinary returns in the riskier credit markets during the last six months of this 12 month period. A similar return story played out in the currency markets, as the higher yielding emerging market currencies, and currencies of commodity exporting countries, outperformed during the second half of the fiscal year. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
John R. Baur
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | The Fund1 seeks to provide total return by investing primarily in a portfolio of securities denominated in foreign currencies, fixed-income instruments issued by foreign entities or sovereigns, and/or derivative instruments denominated in or based on the currencies, interest rates or issues of foreign countries. |
Michael A. Cirami, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | During the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, the Fund slightly outperformed its benchmark, the JP Morgan Government Bond Index — Global, ex U.S. (the Index). The Fund’s allocation to non-benchmark positions, in regions such as Latin America and Eastern Europe, coupled with its exposure to U.S. agency mortgage-backed positions (MBS), drove its outperformance of the Index. |
|
• | | In Western Europe, the Fund continued to avoid long sovereign exposure in Italian and Spanish debt as concerns remain about their fiscal situations and demographics. The Fund compensated for this underexposure by having overweight long credit positions in France and Germany. In Eastern Europe, the Fund’s off-benchmark exposures to bonds in Czech Republic, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkey, and Macedonia contributed significantly to the Fund’s outperformance. While many of the positions in this region benefited mainly from a rally in riskier assets during the second half of the fiscal year, bonds in Turkey benefited from aggressive rate cuts by the central bank, bringing yields to historic lows. |
Total Return Performance 10/31/08 – 10/31/09
| | | | |
Class A3 | | | 20.67 | % |
JPMorgan Government Bond Index — Global, ex U.S.2 | | | 18.81 | |
See page 3 for more performance information.
| | |
1 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, International Income Portfolio (the Portfolio), with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
2 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
|
3 | | Return does not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares. If the sales charge were deducted, the return would be lower. |
1
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | The Fund was underweight Japan versus the benchmark, which detracted from performance. In the first half of the fiscal year, Japan’s currency benefited from nervous investors’ flight to quality as well as a significant unwinding of the short yen carry trade. A carry trade involves selling a low-yielding currency and buying a high-yielding currency, seeking to earn the difference between the two rates. Japanese government debt found support in the second half of the fiscal year because a large percentage is owned by the Japanese public. The Fund continues to maintain its underweight position in Japan due to concerns about government policies. In August, the country elected a new administration that has focused on increasing domestic demand and decreasing dependency on exports. With its debt-to-GDP ratio at nearly 200%, it appears that significant fiscal problems are on the rise in Japan. |
|
• | | In Latin America, an off-benchmark region that contributed positively to the Fund’s returns, investments in Brazil and Uruguay were standouts. Brazil’s economy proved particularly resilient during the economic crisis. As a result, the currency rebounded significantly as evidence of that resilience emerged. Uruguay, an exporter to Brazil, not only benefited from Brazil’s resilience but also its own growth momentum, as its economy avoided recession amidst global economic deterioration. |
|
• | | The Fund’s MBS holdings remained focused on seasoned, fixed rate, U.S. government agency MBS (seasoned MBS). In the seasoned MBS market, yield spreads to U.S. Treasuries tightened by more than 140 basis points, contributing significantly to the Fund’s outperformance. Principal prepayment rates on these securities were relatively stable for the entire period, paying consistently at an annualized rate in the low teens. |
|
• | | The Fund’s duration increased slightly during the year to 4.51 years as of October 31, 2009, from 4.39 years as of October 31, 2008. Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of a fund or a fixed-income security to changes in interest rates. A shorter duration instrument normally has less exposure to interest rate risk than longer duration instruments. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
Securities Holdings (excludes derivative positions)1
By total net assets
| | |
1 | | Securities Holdings reflect the Portfolio’s securities positions as of 10/31/09. For International and Emerging Market currency exposures, please refer to the Currency Positions table below. |
Currency Positions2
By total net assets
| | | | |
Euro | | | 43.4 | % |
Japan | | | 29.0 | |
United Kingdom | | | 5.6 | |
Egypt | | | 2.7 | |
Lebanon | | | 2.5 | |
Canada | | | 2.4 | |
India | | | 2.0 | |
Poland | | | 1.6 | |
Turkey | | | 1.5 | |
Denmark | | | 1.1 | |
Indonesia | | | 1.0 | |
Australia | | | 1.0 | |
Norway | | | 1.0 | |
Sweden | | | 0.9 | |
Mexico | | | 0.9 | |
South Korea | | | 0.8 | |
China | | | 0.8 | |
Zambia | | | 0.7 | |
Ukraine | | | 0.7 | |
Brazil | | | 0.7 | |
Serbia | | | 0.5 | |
Malaysia | | | 0.5 | |
Russia | | | 0.5 | |
Ghana | | | 0.4 | |
Uruguay | | | 0.4 | |
Colombia | | | 0.2 | |
United Arab Emirates | | | 0.1 | |
Chile | | | 0.1 | |
Iceland | | | 0.1 | |
Costa Rica | | | 0.1 | |
Sri Lanka | | | 0.0 | |
Kazakhstan | | | -0.6 | |
South Africa | | | -1.0 | |
| | |
2 | | Currency Positions reflect the Portfolio’s investments as of 10/31/09. Currency exposures include all foreign exchange denominated assets and all currency derivatives. As of 10/31/09, Foreign Long Derivatives were 88.6%; Other Foreign Short Derivatives were 16.8%. All numbers are a percentage of net assets. Total exposures may exceed 100% due to implicit leverage created by derivatives. |
2
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the JPMorgan Government Bond Index—Global, ex U.S., an unmanaged, broad-based market index consisting entirely of foreign denominated securities. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class A of the Fund and in the JPMorgan Government Bond Index—Global, ex U.S. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
| | | | |
Fund Performance1 | | Class A |
Share Class Symbol | | EAIIX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | |
One Year | | | 20.67 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | 12.49 | |
| | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge) | | | | |
One Year | | | 14.90 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | 10.18 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Date — Class A: 6/27/07. |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. Absent an allocation of expenses to the administrator, the returns would be lower. |
| | | | |
Total Annual | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A |
|
Gross Expense Ratio | | | 3.09 | % |
Net Expense Ratio | | | 1.10 | |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. Net Expense Ratio reflects a contractual expense limitation that continues through February 28, 2010. Thereafter, the expense limitation may be changed or terminated at any time. Without this expense limitation, performance would be lower. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 6/27/07. |
|
| | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index data is available as of month-end only. |
3
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance International Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,135.00 | | | | $5.92 | ** | | |
| | | | | �� | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.70 | | | | $5.60 | ** | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.10% for Class A shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
| | | |
| ** | Absent an allocation of expenses to the administrator, the expenses would be higher. | |
4
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in International Income Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $6,257,258) | | $ | 6,197,340 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 38,992 | | | |
Receivable from affiliate | | | 10,457 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 6,246,789 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 4,653 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 4,173 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 1,533 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 40,588 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 50,989 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 6,195,800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 6,399,565 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (114,898 | ) | | |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | | | (28,949 | ) | | |
Net unrealized depreciation from Portfolio | | | (59,918 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 6,195,800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 6,195,800 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 529,785 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 11.69 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 12.27 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $25,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest allocated from Portfolio (net of foreign taxes, $831) | | $ | 263,647 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (56,880 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 206,767 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Distribution and service fees | | $ | 19,202 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 17,220 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 8,514 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 21,023 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 28,916 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 23,586 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 7,375 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 126,336 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Allocation of expenses to affiliate | | $ | 112,539 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 112,539 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 13,797 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 192,970 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (155,868 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 54,630 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | (8,376 | ) | | |
Written options | | | 23,956 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | 22,844 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (62,814 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 611,089 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (12,109 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | 920 | | | |
Written options | | | 21,442 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 68,311 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 689,653 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 626,839 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 819,809 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 192,970 | | | $ | 173,766 | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, written options, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (62,814 | ) | | | 139,758 | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, written options, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 689,653 | | | | (754,880 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 819,809 | | | $ | (441,356 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $ | (291,229 | ) | | $ | (171,993 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | (123,388 | ) | | | (2,041 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (414,617 | ) | | $ | (174,034 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | $ | 6,137,114 | | | $ | 10,296,758 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | 291,873 | | | | 110,087 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (6,155,710 | ) | | | (4,520,243 | ) | | |
Capital contribution from administrator | | | — | | | | 898 | | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 273,277 | | | $ | 5,887,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 678,469 | | | $ | 5,272,110 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 5,517,331 | | | $ | 245,221 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 6,195,800 | | | $ | 5,517,331 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | (28,949 | ) | | $ | (8,389 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | October 31, 2007(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 10.350 | | | $ | 10.850 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.328 | | | $ | 0.435 | | | $ | 0.124 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.738 | | | | (0.490 | ) | | | 0.468 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 2.066 | | | $ | (0.055 | ) | | $ | 0.592 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.496 | ) | | $ | (0.434 | ) | | $ | (0.014 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | (0.230 | ) | | | (0.013 | ) | | | (0.135 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.726 | ) | | $ | (0.447 | ) | | $ | (0.149 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital contribution from administrator(2) | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.002 | | | $ | 0.407 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 11.690 | | | $ | 10.350 | | | $ | 10.850 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 20.67 | % | | | (0.73 | )%(4) | | | 10.05 | %(4)(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 6,196 | | | $ | 5,517 | | | $ | 245 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(6)(7) | | | 1.10 | %(8) | | | 1.10 | %(8) | | | 1.25 | %(8)(9) | | |
Net investment income(7) | | | 3.01 | % | | | 3.86 | % | | | 3.38 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 28 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 2 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | The impact of the capital contribution by the administrator on total return for the year ended October 31, 2008 was less than 0.005%. Absent a capital contribution by the administrator for the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, total return would have been 9.14%. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(8) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 1.76%, 1.99% and 301.15% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009 and 2008 and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, respectively). |
|
(9) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance International Income Fund (the Fund) is a non-diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers Class A shares, which are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in International Income Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (8.91% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $54,282 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2017.
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed since the start of business on June 27, 2007 to October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
8
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund declares dividends daily to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are generally paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any) are made at least annually. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 291,229 | | | $ | 171,993 | | | |
Long-term capital gains | | $ | 123,388 | | | $ | 2,041 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was increased by $41,712 and accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income was decreased by $41,712 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss), paydown gain (loss), premium amortization and swap contracts. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 48,176 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (54,282 | ) | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (178,908 | ) | | |
Other temporary differences | | $ | (18,751 | ) | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to futures contracts, swap contracts, foreign currency transactions, written option contracts, wash sales, premium amortization, partnership allocations and the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.625% of the Fund’s average daily net assets that are not invested in other investment companies for which EVM or its affiliates serve as investment adviser or administrator (“Investable Assets”) up to $1 billion and is payable monthly. On net assets of $1 billion and over that are invested in Investable Assets, the annual fee is reduced. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund incurred no adviser fee on Investable Assets. To the extent the Fund’s assets are invested in the Portfolio, the Fund is allocated its share of the Portfolio’s adviser fee. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report. EVM also serves as the administrator of the Fund, but receives no compensation. EVM has agreed to reimburse the Fund’s operating expenses to the extent that they exceed 1.10% annually of the Fund’s average daily net assets for Class A. This agreement may be changed or terminated after February 28, 2010. Pursuant to this agreement, EVM was allocated $112,539 of the Fund’s operating expenses for the year ended October 31, 2009.
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $655 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $2,709 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plan
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.30% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund
9
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $19,202 for Class A shares.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
Class A shares may be subject to a 1% contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $2,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A shareholders.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $5,954,492 and $6,129,383, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 548,445 | | | | 902,331 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 26,513 | | | | 9,789 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (578,109 | ) | | | (401,781 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (3,151 | ) | | | 510,339 | | | |
|
|
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 28, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
10
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance International Income Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance International Income Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 2009
11
Eaton Vance International Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of capital gains dividends.
Capital Gain Dividends. The Fund designates $159,375 as a capital gain dividend.
12
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Government Bonds — 41.5% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Australia — 0.6% |
|
Commonwealth of Australia, 5.75%, 6/15/11 | | AUD | | | 177,000 | | | $ | 161,931 | | | |
Commonwealth of Australia, 6.25%, 4/15/15 | | AUD | | | 146,000 | | | | 136,827 | | | |
Commonwealth of Australia, 6.50%, 5/15/13 | | AUD | | | 152,000 | | | | 142,485 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Australia (identified cost $396,797) | | $ | 441,243 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Belgium — 1.6% |
|
Kingdom of Belgium, 4.00%, 3/28/13 | | EUR | | | 211,000 | | | $ | 329,103 | | | |
Kingdom of Belgium, 5.50%, 9/28/17 | | EUR | | | 195,000 | | | | 329,321 | | | |
Kingdom of Belgium, 5.50%, 3/28/28 | | EUR | | | 288,000 | | | | 487,741 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Belgium (identified cost $1,049,729) | | $ | 1,146,165 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Brazil — 0.2% |
|
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional, 6.00%, 5/15/15(1) | | BRL | | | 264,802 | | | $ | 145,664 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Brazil (identified cost $124,049) | | $ | 145,664 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Canada — 2.3% |
|
Canada Housing Trust, 2.20%, 3/15/14 | | CAD | | | 135,000 | | | $ | 122,346 | | | |
Canada Housing Trust, 3.60%, 6/15/13(2) | | CAD | | | 881,000 | | | | 848,017 | | | |
Canada Housing Trust, 4.00%, 6/15/12(2) | | CAD | | | 214,000 | | | | 208,466 | | | |
Canada Housing Trust, 4.10%, 12/15/18 | | CAD | | | 475,000 | | | | 453,701 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Canada (identified cost $1,597,323) | | $ | 1,632,530 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chile — 0.1% |
|
Government of Chile, 2.10%, 9/1/15(3) | | CLP | | | 41,900,320 | | | $ | 75,689 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Chile (identified cost $75,852) | | $ | 75,689 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Congo — 0.0% |
|
Republic of Congo, 3.00%, 6/30/29 | | USD | | | 64,600 | | | $ | 32,139 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Congo (identified cost $25,344) | | $ | 32,139 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Costa Rica — 0.1% |
|
Titulo Propiedad Ud, 1.00%, 1/12/22(4) | | CRC | | | 41,285,649 | | | $ | 31,362 | | | |
Titulo Propiedad Ud, 1.63%, 7/13/16(5) | | CRC | | | 4,763,917 | | | | 3,678 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Costa Rica (identified cost $47,852) | | $ | 35,040 | | | |
|
|
|
Czech Republic — 2.1% |
|
Czech Republic, 4.125%, 3/18/20 | | EUR | | | 1,010,000 | | | $ | 1,448,633 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Czech Republic (identified cost $1,515,532) | | $ | 1,448,633 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Denmark — 1.1% |
|
Kingdom of Denmark, 4.00%, 11/15/15 | | DKK | | | 215,000 | | | $ | 44,419 | | | |
Kingdom of Denmark, 4.00%, 11/15/17 | | DKK | | | 1,008,000 | | | | 206,893 | | | |
Kingdom of Denmark, 5.00%, 11/15/13 | | DKK | | | 938,000 | | | | 201,793 | | | |
Kingdom of Denmark, 6.00%, 11/15/09 | | DKK | | | 1,470,000 | | | | 291,119 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Denmark (identified cost $662,272) | | $ | 744,224 | | | |
|
|
|
|
France — 12.3% |
|
Government of France, 3.75%, 4/25/17 | | EUR | | | 1,320,000 | | | $ | 2,025,504 | | | |
Government of France, 4.00%, 10/25/13 | | EUR | | | 905,000 | | | | 1,417,450 | | | |
Government of France, 4.00%, 4/25/14 | | EUR | | | 570,000 | | | | 893,414 | | | |
Government of France, 4.25%, 10/25/23 | | EUR | | | 1,920,000 | | | | 2,928,514 | | | |
Government of France, 5.50%, 4/25/29 | | EUR | | | 745,000 | | | | 1,289,007 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total France (identified cost $7,729,248) | | $ | 8,553,889 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Georgia — 0.2% |
|
Republic of Georgia, 7.50%, 4/15/13 | | USD | | | 115,000 | | | $ | 116,725 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Georgia (identified cost $77,172) | | $ | 116,725 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Germany — 10.5% |
|
Republic of Germany, 3.75%, 7/4/13 | | EUR | | | 1,096,000 | | | $ | 1,706,207 | | | |
Republic of Germany, 3.75%, 1/4/19 | | EUR | | | 970,000 | | | | 1,489,258 | | | |
Republic of Germany, 5.00%, 1/4/12 | | EUR | | | 1,700,000 | | | | 2,689,472 | | | |
Republic of Germany, 6.25%, 1/4/30 | | EUR | | | 732,000 | | | | 1,390,430 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Germany (identified cost $6,411,388) | | $ | 7,275,367 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ghana — 0.1% |
|
Ghana Government Bond, 13.69%, 3/15/10 | | GHS | | | 140,000 | | | $ | 93,658 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Ghana (identified cost $145,268) | | $ | 93,658 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ivory Coast — 0.0% |
|
Ivory Coast, 4.00%, 3/31/28(6) | | USD | | | 45,000 | | | $ | 26,978 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Ivory Coast (identified cost $16,633) | | $ | 26,978 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements13
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Macedonia — 0.3% |
|
Republic of Macedonia, 4.625%, 12/8/15 | | EUR | | | 190,000 | | | $ | 244,511 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Macedonia (identified cost $163,094) | | $ | 244,511 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Netherlands — 1.7% |
|
Government of Netherlands, 3.75%, 1/15/23 | | EUR | | | 368,000 | | | $ | 535,278 | | | |
Government of Netherlands, 4.50%, 7/15/17 | | EUR | | | 206,000 | | | | 329,233 | | | |
Government of Netherlands, 5.00%, 7/15/12 | | EUR | | | 212,000 | | | | 338,377 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Netherlands (identified cost $1,093,053) | | $ | 1,202,888 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Poland — 0.3% |
|
Poland Government Bond, 3.00%, 8/24/16(7) | | PLN | | | 647,823 | | | $ | 214,086 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Poland (identified cost $184,278) | | $ | 214,086 | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Africa — 0.5% |
|
Republic of South Africa, 6.50%, 6/2/14 | | USD | | | 290,000 | | | $ | 317,550 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total South Africa (identified cost $319,870) | | $ | 317,550 | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Korea — 0.2% |
|
Republic of South Korea, 7.125%, 4/16/19 | | USD | | | 100,000 | | | $ | 117,312 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total South Korea (identified cost $99,088) | | $ | 117,312 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Sweden — 1.3% |
|
Government of Sweden, 3.75%, 8/12/17 | | SEK | | | 5,510,000 | | | $ | 810,435 | | | |
Government of Sweden, 6.75%, 5/5/14 | | SEK | | | 395,000 | | | | 65,502 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Sweden (identified cost $867,693) | | $ | 875,937 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Turkey — 2.0% |
|
Turkey Government Bond, 9.00%, 5/21/14(8) | | TRY | | | 373,400 | | | $ | 296,186 | | | |
Turkey Government Bond, 10.00%, 2/15/12(9) | | TRY | | | 517,666 | | | | 387,066 | | | |
Turkey Government Bond, 12.00%, 8/14/13(10) | | TRY | | | 822,272 | | | | 691,403 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Turkey (identified cost $1,069,154) | | $ | 1,374,655 | | | |
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom — 3.6% |
|
United Kingdom Government Bond, 4.25%, 12/7/27 | | GBP | | | 230,000 | | | $ | 385,752 | | | |
United Kingdom Government Bond, 4.75%, 6/7/10 | | GBP | | | 342,000 | | | | 575,621 | | | |
United Kingdom Government Bond, 4.75%, 3/7/20 | | GBP | | | 285,000 | | | | 508,706 | | | |
United Kingdom Government Bond, 5.00%, 3/7/12 | | GBP | | | 321,000 | | | | 567,708 | | | |
United Kingdom Government Bond, 5.00%, 9/7/14 | | GBP | | | 266,000 | | | | 481,372 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total United Kingdom (identified cost $2,828,729) | | $ | 2,519,159 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Uruguay — 0.4% |
|
Republic of Uruguay, 5.00%, 9/14/18(11) | | UYU | | | 5,055,573 | | | $ | 250,454 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Uruguay (identified cost $216,807) | | $ | 250,454 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Foreign Government Bonds (identified cost $26,716,225) | | $ | 28,884,496 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Corporate Bonds — 0.3% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Kazakhstan — 0.3% |
|
Kazkommerts International, 7.875%, 4/7/14(12) | | USD | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 168,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Kazakhstan (identified cost $166,203) | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ | 168,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Foreign Corporate Bonds | | | | | | |
(identified cost $166,203) | | | | | | $ | 168,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations — 4.7% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., Series 2127, Class PG, 6.25%, 2/15/29 | | | | $ | 735,066 | | | $ | 784,621 | | | |
Federal National Mortgage Association, Series 1991-139, Class PN, 7.50%, 10/25/21(13) | | | | | 868,893 | | | | 970,995 | | | |
Federal National Mortgage Association, Series 2009-62, Class WA, 5.56%, 8/25/39 | | | | | 1,449,612 | | | | 1,545,948 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | | |
(identified cost $3,183,072) | | | | | | $ | 3,301,564 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements14
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage Pass-Throughs — 27.3% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6.00% with maturity at 2016 | | | | $ | 1,417,528 | | | $ | 1,520,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | $ | 1,520,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2.72% with maturity at 2035(14) | | | | $ | 1,945,334 | | | $ | 1,995,822 | | | |
4.42% with maturity at 2035(14) | | | | | 2,214,272 | | | | 2,304,226 | | | |
6.00% with maturity at 2019 | | | | | 354,009 | | | | 378,242 | | | |
6.50% with maturity at 2017 | | | | | 709,911 | | | | 751,297 | | | |
7.00% with various maturities to 2033 | | | | | 2,728,158 | | | | 3,027,194 | | | |
7.50% with maturity at 2035 | | | | | 926,702 | | | | 1,040,876 | | | |
8.50% with maturity at 2032 | | | | | 872,376 | | | | 1,020,481 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 10,518,138 | | | |
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7.00% with various maturities to 2035 | | | | $ | 3,119,388 | | | $ | 3,456,388 | | | |
8.00% with maturity at 2016 | | | | | 1,389,327 | | | | 1,501,072 | | | |
9.00% with various maturities to 2024 | | | | | 1,703,300 | | | | 1,990,204 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 6,947,664 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Mortgage Pass-Throughs (identified cost $18,440,669) | | $ | 18,986,302 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency Options Purchased — 0.0% |
|
| | Principal Amount of
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Contracts
| | | Strike
| | | Expiration
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Price | | | Date | | | Value | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Japanese Yen Put Option | | | JPY 910,000 | | | | JPY 107.75 | | | | 4/6/10 | | | $ | 5,762 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Currency Options Purchased (identified cost $163,800) | | $ | 5,762 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 21.1%
|
Foreign Government Securities — 8.2% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Egypt — 3.1% |
|
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/3/09 | | EGP | | | 3,350,000 | | | $ | 611,930 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/10/09 | | EGP | | | 1,225,000 | | | | 223,345 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/17/09 | | EGP | | | 1,250,000 | | | | 227,476 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/24/09 | | EGP | | | 575,000 | | | | 104,441 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/1/09 | | EGP | | | 1,025,000 | | | | 185,828 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/8/09 | | EGP | | | 2,275,000 | | | | 411,672 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 6/29/10 | | EGP | | | 600,000 | | | | 102,823 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 8/3/10 | | EGP | | | 500,000 | | | | 84,891 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 9/28/10 | | EGP | | | 500,000 | | | | 83,660 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 10/26/10 | | EGP | | | 425,000 | | | | 70,538 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 10/26/10 | | EGP | | | 525,000 | | | | 87,135 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Egypt (identified cost $2,176,202) | | $ | 2,193,739 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Iceland — 0.1% |
|
Iceland Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/16/09 | | ISK | | | 3,152,000 | | | $ | 21,246 | | | |
Iceland Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/15/10 | | ISK | | | 577,000 | | | | 3,806 | | | |
Iceland Treasury Note, 7.00%, 3/17/10 | | ISK | | | 1,965,000 | | | | 13,228 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Iceland (identified cost $36,420) | | $ | 38,280 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lebanon — 2.5% |
|
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/5/09 | | LBP | | | 86,000,000 | | | $ | 57,219 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/19/09 | | LBP | | | 134,000,000 | | | | 88,991 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/17/09 | | LBP | | | 63,920,000 | | | | 42,328 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/17/09 | | LBP | | | 66,300,000 | | | | 43,905 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/24/09 | | LBP | | | 101,950,000 | | | | 67,450 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/31/09 | | LBP | | | 105,910,000 | | | | 70,003 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/7/10 | | LBP | | | 102,000,000 | | | | 67,351 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/21/10 | | LBP | | | 68,000,000 | | | | 44,807 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/4/10 | | LBP | | | 136,000,000 | | | | 89,413 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/18/10 | | LBP | | | 100,000,000 | | | | 65,588 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 3/4/10 | | LBP | | | 51,000,000 | | | | 33,366 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 3/18/10 | | LBP | | | 478,290,000 | | | | 312,083 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/1/10 | | LBP | | | 230,000,000 | | | | 149,655 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/15/10 | | LBP | | | 259,000,000 | | | | 168,031 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/29/10 | | LBP | | | 450,000,000 | | | | 291,721 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 9/23/10 | | LBP | | | 73,000,000 | | | | 46,073 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 10/21/10 | | LBP | | | 149,400,000 | | | | 93,847 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Lebanon (identified cost $1,714,420) | | $ | 1,731,831 | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Korea — 0.6% |
|
Korea Monetary Stabilization Bond, 5.54%, 11/14/09 | | KRW | | | 241,080,000 | | | $ | 204,143 | | | |
Korea Monetary Stabilization Bond, 5.45%, 1/23/10 | | KRW | | | 107,620,000 | | | | 91,685 | | | |
Korea Monetary Treasury Bond, 4.75%, 12/10/09 | | KRW | | | 127,610,000 | | | | 108,225 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total South Korea (identified cost $389,968) | | $ | 404,053 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements15
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Sri Lanka — 1.9% |
|
Sri Lanka Government Bond, 15.50%, 1/15/10 | | LKR | | | 14,500,000 | | | $ | 127,911 | | | |
Sri Lanka Government Bond, 7.60%, 4/1/10 | | LKR | | | 1,970,000 | | | | 17,042 | | | |
Sri Lanka Government Bond, 15.50%, 5/15/10 | | LKR | | | 6,990,000 | | | | 62,791 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/6/09 | | LKR | | | 23,000,000 | | | | 200,024 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/6/09 | | LKR | | | 17,000,000 | | | | 147,844 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/8/10 | | LKR | | | 24,000,000 | | | | 205,651 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/15/10 | | LKR | | | 29,825,000 | | | | 255,131 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/5/10 | | LKR | | | 28,540,000 | | | | 242,931 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/9/10 | | LKR | | | 7,250,000 | | | | 60,737 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/30/10 | | LKR | | | 4,450,000 | | | | 37,138 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Sri Lanka (identified cost $1,353,169) | | $ | 1,357,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Foreign Government Securities | | | | | | |
(identified cost $5,670,179) | | | | | | $ | 5,725,103 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase Agreements(15) — 7.9% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | | | Amount
| | | | | | |
Description | | | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Barclays Bank PLC, dated 10/8/09, with an interest rate of 0.80%, collateralized by Venezuela Government Bond with an interest rate of 10.75%, a maturity date of 9/19/13 and a market value of $1,929,486. | | | | $ | 1,954 | | | $ | 1,954,447 | | | |
Barclays Bank PLC, dated 9/16/09, with an interest rate of 0.85%, collateralized by Costa Rica Government Bond with an interest rate of 9.995%, a maturity date of 8/1/20 and a market value of $1,309,710. | | | | | 1,287 | | | | 1,286,788 | | | |
Citibank, dated 10/19/09, with an interest rate of 0.40%, collateralized by Turkey Government Bond with an interest rate of 7.00%, a maturity date of 9/26/16 and a market value of $2,223,222. | | | | | 2,222 | | | | 2,222,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Repurchase Agreements | | | | | | |
(identified cost $5,463,435) | | | | | | $ | 5,463,435 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Securities — 5.0% |
|
| | | | Interest
| | | | | | |
| | | | Amount
| | | | | | |
Description | | | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(16) | | | | $ | 3,503 | | | $ | 3,503,113 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Other Securities — 5.0% (identified cost $3,503,113) | | $ | 3,503,113 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Short-Term Investments (identified cost $14,636,727) | | $ | 14,691,651 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Investments — 94.9% (cost $63,306,696) | | $ | 66,038,275 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency Options Written — (0.1)% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amount of
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Contracts
| | | Strike
| | | Expiration
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Price | | | Date | | | Value | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Japanese Yen Call Option | | JPY | 1,335,000 | | | JPY | 76.40 | | | | 4/6/10 | | | $ | (68,963 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Currency Options Written (premiums received $152,300) | | $ | (68,963 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 5.2% | | $ | 3,612,049 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 69,581,361 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
AUD - Australian Dollar
BRL - Brazilian Real
CAD - Canadian Dollar
CLP - Chilean Peso
CRC - Costa Rican Colon
DKK - Danish Krone
EGP - Egyptian Pound
EUR - Euro
GBP - British Pound Sterling
GHS - Ghanaian Cedi
ISK - Icelandic Krona
JPY - Japanese Yen
KRW - South Korean Won
LBP - Lebanese Pound
LKR - Sri Lanka Rupee
PLN - Polish Zloty
SEK - Swedish Krona
TRY - New Turkish Lira
See notes to financial statements16
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
USD - United States Dollar
UYU - Uruguayan Peso
| | |
(1) | | Bond pays a 6.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the IPCA (Amplified Consumer Price Index) as determined by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. The original face is BRL 143,000 and current face is BRL 264,802. |
|
(2) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $1,056,483 or 1.5% of the Portfolio’s net assets. |
|
(3) | | Bond pays a 2.10% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Chilean Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is CLP 41,866,040 and current face is CLP 41,900,320. |
|
(4) | | Bond pays a 1.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on Development Units (Unidades de Desarrolla) as calculated by the General Superintendent of Values. The original face is CRC 33,700,000 and current face is CRC 41,285,649. |
|
(5) | | Bond pays a 1.63% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on Development Units (Unidades de Desarrolla) as calculated by the General Superintendent of Values. The original face is CRC 3,700,000 and current face is CRC 4,763,917. |
|
(6) | | Currently the issuer is in default with respect to interest payments. |
|
(7) | | Bond pays a 3.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Poland Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is PLN 565,000 and current face is PLN 647,823. |
|
(8) | | Bond pays a 9.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Turkey Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is TRY 370,000 and current face is TRY 373,400. |
|
(9) | | Bond pays a 10.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Turkey Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is TRY 426,000 and current face is TRY 517,666. |
|
(10) | | Bond pays a 12.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Turkey Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is TRY 779,000 and the current face is TRY 822,272. |
|
(11) | | Bond pays a 5.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Uruguayan inflation rate. The original face is UYU 4,000,000, and current face is UYU 5,055,573. |
|
(12) | | Security exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, which exempts from registration securities offered and sold outside the United States. Security |
| | |
| | may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. |
|
(13) | | Weighted average fixed-rate coupon that changes/updates monthly. |
|
(14) | | Adjustable rate mortgage security. Rate shown is the rate at October 31, 2009. |
|
(15) | | Open repurchase agreements with no specific maturity date. Either party may terminate the agreement upon demand. |
|
(16) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements17
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $59,803,583) | | $ | 62,535,162 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $3,503,113) | | | 3,503,113 | | | |
Cash held by broker for open financial futures contracts | | | 328,472 | | | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $216,286) | | | 215,683 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 693,731 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 2,381,260 | | | |
Receivable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 30,634 | | | |
Receivable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 561,343 | | | |
Receivable for closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 9,997 | | | |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | | 385,826 | | | |
Receivable for closed swap contracts | | | 20,261 | | | |
Receivable for closed options | | | 27,515 | | | |
Premium paid on open swap contracts | | | 34,821 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 70,727,818 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 566,603 | | | |
Payable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 118,522 | | | |
Payable for closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 1,736 | | | |
Payable for open swap contracts | | | 269,026 | | | |
Payable for closed swap contracts | | | 10,873 | | | |
Written options outstanding, at value (premiums received, $152,300) | | | 68,963 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 36,064 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 192 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 74,478 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,146,457 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 69,581,361 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 66,208,275 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 3,373,086 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 69,581,361 | | | |
|
|
Statement of Operations
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest (net of foreign taxes, $6,698) | | $ | 1,993,961 | | | |
Interest allocated from affiliated investment | | | 45,776 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (29,904 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 2,009,833 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 271,575 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 2,565 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 58,167 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 65,637 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 3,001 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 400,945 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 1,608,888 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (331,994 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | 213,278 | | | |
Written options | | | 117,803 | | | |
Swap contracts | | | (26,102 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | 1,589,640 | | | |
|
|
Net realized gain | | $ | 1,562,625 | | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 5,210,900 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (16,254 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (78,076 | ) | | |
Written options | | | 154,761 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 621,279 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 5,892,610 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 7,455,235 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 9,064,123 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements18
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 1,608,888 | | | $ | 1,324,768 | | | |
Net realized gain from investment transactions, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, written options, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | 1,562,625 | | | | 1,977,688 | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, written options, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 5,892,610 | | | | (3,998,350 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 9,064,123 | | | $ | (695,894 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 33,505,208 | | | $ | 17,567,573 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (6,742,649 | ) | | | (6,696,831 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase from capital transactions | | $ | 26,762,559 | | | $ | 10,870,742 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 35,826,682 | | | $ | 10,174,848 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 33,754,679 | | | $ | 23,579,831 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 69,581,361 | | | $ | 33,754,679 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements19
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | October 31, 2007(1) | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(2) | | | 0.90 | % | | | 1.01 | % | | | 1.35 | %(3) | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.34 | % | | | 4.01 | % | | | 3.75 | %(3) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 28 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 2 | %(4) | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 20.91 | % | | | (0.64 | )% | | | 10.05 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 69,581 | | | $ | 33,755 | | | $ | 23,580 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. |
|
(2) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements20
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
International Income Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a non-diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to seek total return. Total return is defined as income plus capital appreciation. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance International Income Fund, Eaton Vance Medallion Strategic Income Fund and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund held an interest of 8.91%, 9.86% and 81.03%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days and excluding most seasoned mortgage-backed securities) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Most seasoned, fixed rate 30-year mortgage-backed securities are valued through the use of the investment adviser’s matrix pricing system, which takes into account bond prices, yield differentials, anticipated prepayments and interest rates provided by dealers. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less (excluding those that are non-U.S. dollar denominated, which typically are valued by a pricing service or dealer quotes) are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Exchange-traded options are valued at the last sale price for the day of valuation as quoted on any exchange on which the option is listed or, in the absence of sales on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore as reported by the Options Price Reporting Authority. Over-the-counter options (including options on securities, indices and foreign currencies) are valued by a third party pricing service using techniques that consider factors including the value of the underlying instrument,
the volatility of the underlying instrument and the time until option expiration. Financial futures contracts are valued at the settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of the average bid and average asked prices that are reported by currency dealers to a third party pricing service at the valuation time. Such third party pricing service valuations are supplied for specific settlement periods and the Portfolio’s forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at an interpolated rate between the closest preceding and subsequent settlement period reported by the third party pricing service. Interest rate swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. Such pricing service valuations are based on the present value of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value using swap quotations provided by electronic data services or by broker/dealers. Credit default swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. The pricing services employ electronic data processing techniques to determine the present value based on credit spread quotations obtained from broker/dealers and expected default recovery rates determined by the pricing service using proprietary models. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash
21
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities in the same manner as debt obligations described above.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed since the start of business on June 27, 2007 to October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S.
dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
I Financial Futures Contracts — The Portfolio may enter into financial futures contracts. The Portfolio’s investment in financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against changes in interest rates or as a substitute for the purchase of securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the Portfolio is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Portfolio each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Portfolio. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change
22
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
unexpectedly, the Portfolio may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. In entering such contracts, the Portfolio bears the risk if the counterparties do not perform under the contracts’ terms. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.
J Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts — The Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. The Portfolio enters into forward contracts for hedging purposes as well as non-hedging purposes. The forward foreign currency exchange contract is adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any gains or losses are recorded as unrealized until such time as the contract has been closed or offset by another contract with the same broker for the same settlement date and currency. Risks may arise upon entering these contracts from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts and from movements in the value of a foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar.
K Written Options — Upon the writing of a call or a put option, the premium received by the Portfolio is included in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability. The amount of the liability is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current market value of the option written, in accordance with the Portfolio’s policies on investment valuations discussed above. Premiums received from writing options which expire are treated as realized gains. Premiums received from writing options which are exercised or are closed are added to or offset against the proceeds or amount paid on the transaction to determine the realized gain or loss. If a put option on a security is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the securities purchased by the Portfolio. The Portfolio, as a writer of an option, may have no control over whether the underlying securities or other assets may be sold (call) or purchased (put) and, as a result, bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the securities or other assets underlying the written option. The Portfolio may also bear the risk of not being able to enter into a closing transaction if a liquid secondary market does not exist.
L Purchased Options — Upon the purchase of a call or put option, the premium paid by the Portfolio is included in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as an investment. The amount of the investment is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current market value of the option purchased, in accordance with the Portfolio’s policies on investment valuations discussed above. If an option which the Portfolio had purchased expires on the
stipulated expiration date, the Portfolio will realize a loss in the amount of the cost of the option. If the Portfolio enters into a closing sale transaction, the Portfolio will realize a gain or loss, depending on whether the sales proceeds from the closing sale transaction are greater or less than the cost of the option. If the Portfolio exercises a put option, it will realize a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security, and the proceeds from such sale will be decreased by the premium originally paid. If the Portfolio exercises a call option, the cost of the security which the Portfolio purchases upon exercise will be increased by the premium originally paid. The risk associated with purchasing options is limited to the premium originally paid.
M Interest Rate Swaps — The Portfolio may enter into interest rate swap agreements to enhance return, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates, or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities. Pursuant to these agreements, the Portfolio either makes floating-rate payments based on a benchmark interest rate in exchange for fixed-rate payments or the Portfolio makes fixed-rate payments in exchange for payments on a floating benchmark interest rate. Payments received or made are recorded as realized gains or losses. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between two rates of interest. The Portfolio is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from movements in interest rates.
N Cross-Currency Swaps — Cross-currency swaps are interest rate swaps in which interest cash flows are exchanged between two parties based on the notional amounts of two different currencies. The notional amounts are typically determined based on the spot exchange rates at the inception of the trade. Cross-currency swaps also involve the exchange of the notional amounts at the start of the contract at the current spot rate with an agreement to re-exchange such amounts at a later date at either the same exchange rate, a specified rate or the then current spot rate. The entire principal value of a cross-currency swap is subject to the risk that the counterparty to the swap will default on its contractual delivery obligations.
O Credit Default Swaps — When the Portfolio is the buyer of a credit default swap contract, the Portfolio is entitled to receive the par (or other agreed-upon) value of a referenced debt obligation (or basket of debt obligations) from the counterparty to the contract if a credit event by a third party, such as a U.S. or foreign corporate issuer or sovereign issuer, on the debt obligation occurs. In return, the Portfolio pays the counterparty a periodic stream of
23
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
payments over the term of the contract provided that no credit event has occurred. If no credit event occurs, the Portfolio would have spent the stream of payments and received no benefits from the contract. When the Portfolio is the seller of a credit default swap contract, it receives the stream of payments, but is obligated to pay to the buyer of the protection an amount up to the notional amount of the swap and in certain instances take delivery of securities of the reference entity upon the occurrence of a credit event, as defined under the terms of that particular swap agreement. Credit events are contract specific but may include bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration and repudiation/moratorium. If the Portfolio is a seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Portfolio could be required to make would be an amount equal to the notional amount of the agreement. This potential amount would be partially offset by any recovery value of the respective referenced obligation, or net amount received from the settlement of a buy protection credit default swap agreement entered into by the Portfolio for the same referenced obligation. As the seller, the Portfolio effectively adds leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, the Portfolio is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. The interest fee paid or received on the swap contract, which is based on a specified interest rate on a fixed notional amount, is accrued daily as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and is recorded as realized gain upon receipt or realized loss upon payment. The Portfolio also records an increase or decrease to unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in an amount equal to the daily valuation. Up-front payments or receipts, if any, are recorded as other assets or other liabilities, respectively, and amortized over the life of the swap contract as realized gains or losses. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to the notional amount of the credit default swaps of which it is the seller. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to any unrealized depreciation of the credit default swaps of which it is the buyer, marked to market on a daily basis. These transactions involve certain risks, including the risk that the seller may be unable to fulfill the transaction.
P Total Return Swaps — In a total return swap, the Portfolio makes payments at a rate equal to a predetermined spread to the one or three-month LIBOR. In exchange, the Portfolio receives payments based on the rate of return of a benchmark industry index or basket of securities. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains and losses. Periodic payments received or made are recorded as realized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between the rate of interest and the
benchmark industry index or basket of securities. The Portfolio is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from the unanticipated movements in value of interest rates, securities, or the index.
Q Repurchase Agreements — The Portfolio may enter into repurchase agreements with banks and broker-dealers determined to be creditworthy by the Portfolio’s investment adviser. Under a repurchase agreement, the Portfolio buys a security at one price and simultaneously promises to sell that same security back to the seller at a higher price for settlement at a later date. At the time the Portfolio enters into a repurchase agreement, it typically receives collateral at least equal to the repurchase price. Repurchase agreements are marked-to-market daily. In the event of bankruptcy of the counterparty or a third party custodian, the Portfolio might experience delays in recovering its cash or experience a loss.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.625% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $1 billion and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $299,972 of which $28,397 was allocated from Cash Management and $271,575 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
24
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations and including maturities and paydowns, for the year ended October 31, 2009 were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Purchases | | | | | | |
|
|
Investments (non-U.S. Government) | | $ | 14,684,455 | | | |
U.S. Government and Agency Securities | | | 14,315,013 | | | |
|
|
| | $ | 28,999,468 | | | |
|
|
Sales | | | | | | |
|
|
Investments (non-U.S. Government) | | $ | 7,760,347 | | | |
U.S. Government and Agency Securities | | | 3,010,810 | | | |
|
|
| | $ | 10,771,157 | | | |
|
|
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 63,392,954 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 3,122,211 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (476,890 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 2,645,321 | | | |
|
|
The net unrealized appreciation on swaps, written options, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts at October 31, 2009 on a federal income tax basis was $540,612.
5 Financial Instruments
The Portfolio may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include written options, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, financial futures contracts and swap contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Portfolio has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered. A summary of written call options at October 31, 2009 is included in the Portfolio of Investments.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at October 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
|
Sales |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | Deliver | | In Exchange For | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
11/6/09 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 17,000,000 | | United States Dollar 145,461 | | $ | (2,562 | ) | | |
11/6/09 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 23,000,000 | | United States Dollar 197,595 | | | (2,671 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 541,725 | | United States Dollar 4,707 | | | (3 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | South African Rand 3,972,582 | | United States Dollar 536,473 | | | 29,710 | | | |
11/23/09 | | South African Rand 1,607,881 | | United States Dollar 217,076 | | | 11,966 | | | |
11/27/09 | | Swedish Krona 2,835,000 | | United States Dollar 413,075 | | | 13,302 | | | |
1/8/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 7,000,000 | | United States Dollar 59,372 | | | (1,162 | ) | | |
1/8/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 17,000,000 | | United States Dollar 144,129 | | | (2,883 | ) | | |
1/15/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 10,625,000 | | United States Dollar 90,157 | | | (1,675 | ) | | |
1/15/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 15,623,750 | | United States Dollar 132,889 | | | (2,147 | ) | | |
1/15/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 19,200,000 | | United States Dollar 162,988 | | | (2,957 | ) | | |
2/5/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 28,540,000 | | United States Dollar 243,204 | | | (3,067 | ) | | |
4/1/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 2,044,860 | | United States Dollar 17,540 | | | (48 | ) | | |
4/9/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 7,250,000 | | United States Dollar 62,232 | | | (100 | ) | | |
4/30/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 4,450,000 | | United States Dollar 38,197 | | | (15 | ) | | |
5/17/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 7,531,725 | | United States Dollar 64,346 | | | (256 | ) | | |
7/20/10 | | Kazakhstan Tenge 22,347,800 | | United States Dollar 137,103 | | | (9,577 | ) | | |
7/21/10 | | Kazakhstan Tenge 22,253,300 | | United States Dollar 137,366 | | | (8,680 | ) | | |
7/23/10 | | Kazakhstan Tenge 22,791,200 | | United States Dollar 140,470 | | | (9,080 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,095 | | | |
|
|
11/4/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 1,288,000,000 | | United States Dollar 125,243 | | $ | 9,602 | | | |
11/5/09 | | Japanese Yen 769,932,000 | | United States Dollar 8,512,992 | | | 40,427 | | | |
11/5/09 | | Japanese Yen 38,020,000 | | United States Dollar 413,095 | | | 9,281 | | | |
25
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts (continued) |
|
Purchases |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | In Exchange For | | Deliver | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
11/5/09 | | Mexican Peso 4,199,000 | | United States Dollar 324,302 | | | (6,328 | ) | | |
11/5/09 | | Polish Zloty 250,000 | | Euro 58,790 | | | (114 | ) | | |
11/5/09 | | Polish Zloty 2,264,344 | | Euro 533,352 | | | (2,319 | ) | | |
11/9/09 | | Indian Rupee 8,540,000 | | United States Dollar 180,741 | | | 1,058 | | | |
11/9/09 | | Indian Rupee 7,890,000 | | United States Dollar 169,096 | | | (1,134 | ) | | |
11/10/09 | | Indian Rupee 13,290,000 | | United States Dollar 272,280 | | | 10,626 | | | |
11/10/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 1,058,000,000 | | United States Dollar 104,422 | | | 6,229 | | | |
11/12/09 | | Japanese Yen 1,145,514,160 | | United States Dollar 12,438,599 | | | 287,737 | | | |
11/12/09 | | Russian Ruble 5,000,000 | | United States Dollar 170,605 | | | 353 | | | |
11/12/09 | | Russian Ruble 4,600,000 | | United States Dollar 156,943 | | | 338 | | | |
11/13/09 | | Australian Dollar 97,600 | | United States Dollar 87,710 | | | 62 | | | |
11/13/09 | | Euro 8,273,212 | | United States Dollar 12,161,042 | | | 13,961 | | | |
11/13/09 | | South Korean Won 204,700,000 | | United States Dollar 175,347 | | | (2,224 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | Indian Rupee 7,070,000 | | United States Dollar 145,773 | | | 4,695 | | | |
11/16/09 | | New Turkish Lira 80,000 | | United States Dollar 54,488 | | | (1,403 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | New Turkish Lira 608,138 | | United States Dollar 414,545 | | | (11,005 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | Swedish Krona 1,180,000 | | Euro 114,351 | | | (1,892 | ) | | |
11/19/09 | | Malaysian Ringgit 564,000 | | United States Dollar 168,283 | | | (3,073 | ) | | |
11/19/09 | | Norwegian Krone 230,000 | | Euro 27,690 | | | (604 | ) | | |
11/19/09 | | Zambian Kwacha 187,300,000 | | United States Dollar 40,471 | | | (199 | ) | | |
11/20/09 | | Malaysian Ringgit 550,000 | | United States Dollar 163,837 | | $ | (2,731 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | Colombian Peso 273,125,859 | | United States Dollar 143,317 | | | (7,004 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | Mexican Peso 4,294,000 | | United States Dollar 331,238 | | $ | (6,832 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | Norwegian Krone 2,372,500 | | Euro 283,453 | | | (3,087 | ) | | |
11/25/09 | | Indian Rupee 5,500,000 | | United States Dollar 114,512 | | | 2,505 | | | |
11/27/09 | | British Pound Sterling 681,444 | | Euro 753,038 | | | 10,096 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Australian Dollar 177,800 | | United States Dollar 163,679 | | | (4,036 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | British Pound Sterling 115,349 | | United States Dollar 188,848 | | | 435 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Euro 469,311 | | United States Dollar 691,704 | | | (1,084 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 1,890,000,000 | | United States Dollar 194,986 | | | 1,992 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 1,101,000,000 | | United States Dollar 115,676 | | | (928 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Norwegian Krone 1,240,000 | | Euro 148,704 | | | (2,485 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Serbian Dinar 10,100,000 | | Euro 107,333 | | | (19 | ) | | |
12/2/09 | | Brazilian Real 590,831 | | United States Dollar 334,332 | | | (872 | ) | | |
12/4/09 | | Indian Rupee 3,040,000 | | United States Dollar 54,681 | | | (23 | ) | | |
12/11/09 | | Zambian Kwacha 285,300,000 | | United States Dollar 53,577 | | | 7,453 | | | |
12/21/09 | | Indian Rupee 5,400,000 | | United States Dollar 117,955 | | | (3,167 | ) | | |
12/21/09 | | Zambian Kwacha 360,000,000 | | United States Dollar 66,667 | | | 10,141 | | | |
1/13/10 | | Indonesian Rupiah 1,407,370,000 | | United States Dollar 149,165 | | | (3,278 | ) | | |
1/14/10 | | Indian Rupee 15,500,000 | | United States Dollar 334,629 | | | (5,413 | ) | | |
1/21/10 | | Serbian Dinar 13,400,000 | | Euro 140,978 | | | (385 | ) | | |
1/27/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 648,441,500 | | United States Dollar 119,243 | | | 17,850 | | | |
4/13/10 | | Ghanaian Cedi 251,500 | | United States Dollar 158,425 | | | 5,595 | | | |
5/26/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 355,800,000 | | United States Dollar 60,142 | | $ | 12,045 | | | |
5/27/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 332,600,000 | | United States Dollar 56,126 | | | 11,333 | | | |
7/20/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 1,377,900 | | United States Dollar 137,104 | | | 9,769 | | | |
26
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts (continued) |
|
Purchases |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | In Exchange For | | Deliver | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
7/21/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 1,360,000 | | United States Dollar 137,374 | | | 7,517 | | | |
7/23/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 1,395,100 | | United States Dollar 140,919 | | | 7,556 | | | |
9/3/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 540,000 | | United States Dollar 48,214 | | | 8,125 | | | |
9/28/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 235,100,000 | | United States Dollar 44,653 | | | 1,127 | | | |
6/15/11 | | Yuan Renminbi 2,300,000 | | United States Dollar 347,958 | | | 5,806 | | | |
6/15/11 | | Yuan Renminbi 1,100,000 | | United States Dollar 166,541 | | | 2,651 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 434,726 | | | |
|
|
At October 31, 2009, closed forward foreign currency purchases and sales contracts excluded above amounted to a receivable of $9,997 and a payable of $1,736.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Expiration
| | | | | | Aggregate
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Date | | Contracts | | Position | | Cost | | | Value | | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
12/09 | | 5 Euro-Bobl | | Long | | $ | 847,987 | | | $ | 850,761 | | | $ | 2,774 | | | |
12/09 | | 38 Euro-Bund | | Long | | | 6,843,324 | | | | 6,816,981 | | | | (26,343 | ) | | |
12/09 | | 6 Euro-Buxl | | Long | | | 858,814 | | | | 867,450 | | | | 8,636 | | | |
12/09 | | 15 Euro-Schatz | | Long | | | 2,383,677 | | | | 2,388,489 | | | | 4,812 | | | |
12/09 | | 12 U.K. Gilt | | Long | | | 2,313,807 | | | | 2,334,644 | | | | 20,837 | | | |
12/09 | | 18 U.S. 30 Year Treasury Bond | | Short | | | (2,143,484 | ) | | | (2,162,813 | ) | | | (19,329 | ) | | |
12/09 | | 4 U.S. 5 Year Treasury Note | | Short | | | (461,517 | ) | | | (465,812 | ) | | | (4,295 | ) | | |
12/09 | | 3 U.S. 10 Year Treasury Note | | Short | | | (350,333 | ) | | | (355,828 | ) | | | (5,495 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (18,403 | ) | | |
|
|
Euro-Bobl: Medium-term debt securities issued by the Federal Republic of Germany with a remaining term to maturity of 4.5 to 5 years.
Euro-Bund: Long-term debt securities issued by the Federal Republic of Germany with a remaining term to maturity of 8.5 to 10.5 years.
Euro-Buxl: Long-term debt securities issued by the Federal Republic of Germany with a remaining term to maturity of 24 to 35 years.
Euro-Schatz: Medium-term debt securities issued by the Federal Republic of Germany or the Treuhandanstalt with a remaining term to maturity of 13/4 to 21/4 years.
U.K. Gilt: Gilt issues having a maturity of 81/4 to 13 years from the calendar day of the delivery month.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
| | | | Portfolio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Pays/
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Receives
| | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
| | Notional
| | Floating
| | Floating
| | Annual
| | | Termination
| | | Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | Rate | | Rate Index | | Fixed Rate | | | Date | | | Depreciation | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank | | BRL 2,568,875 | | Pay | | Brazil Interbank Deposit Rate | | | 9.67 | % | | | 1/03/11 | | | $ | (8,655 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (8,655 | ) | | |
|
|
BRL - Brazilian Real
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swaps — Sell Protection |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | Current
| | | | | |
| | | | Notional
| | | Contract
| | | | | Market
| | Net
| | | |
| | | | Amount*
| | | Annual
| | | | | Annual
| | Unrealized
| | | |
Reference
| | | | (000’s
| | | Fixed
| | Termination
| | | Fixed
| | Appreciation
| | | |
Entity | | Counterparty | | omitted) | | | Rate** | | Date | | | Rate*** | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
Brazil | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | $ | 200 | | | 5.25% | | | 11/20/09 | | | | 0 | .36% | | $ | 5,356 | | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 300 | | | 1.75 | | | 3/20/18 | | | | 3 | .22 | | | (27,293 | ) | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 100 | | | 1.90 | | | 3/20/18 | | | | 3 | .22 | | | (8,130 | ) | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 100 | | | 2.10 | | | 3/20/23 | | | | 3 | .07 | | | (7,985 | ) | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 100 | | | 2.45 | | | 3/20/23 | | | | 3 | .07 | | | (4,970 | ) | | |
|
|
Kazakhstan | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 200 | | | 9.75 | | | 11/20/09 | | | | 0 | .82 | | | 9,929 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (33,093 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swaps — Buy Protection |
|
| | | | Notional
| | | Contract
| | | | Net
| | | |
| | | | Amount*
| | | Annual
| | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Reference
| | | | (000’s
| | | Fixed
| | Termination
| | Appreciation
| | | |
Entity | | Counterparty | | omitted) | | | Rate** | | Date | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
Austria | | Barclays Bank PLC | | $ | 200 | | | 0.44% | | 12/20/13 | | $ | 503 | | | |
|
|
Austria | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 100 | | | 1.42 | | 3/20/14 | | | (3,888) | | | |
|
|
Brazil | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 250 | | | 1.65 | | 9/20/19 | | | (1,864) | | | |
|
|
Greece | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 4,000 | | | 0.13 | | 9/20/17 | | | 359,944 | | | |
|
|
Lebanon | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 200 | | | 1.00(1) | | 12/20/14 | | | (1,588) | | | |
|
|
Lebanon | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 150 | | | 3.30 | | 9/20/14 | | | (4,916) | | | |
|
|
Malaysia | | Bank of America | | | 100 | | | 0.83 | | 12/20/14 | | | 546 | | | |
|
|
Malaysia | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 200 | | | 0.82 | | 12/20/14 | | | 1,167 | | | |
|
|
Malaysia | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 200 | | | 2.40 | | 3/20/14 | | | (13,501) | | | |
|
|
27
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swaps — Buy Protection (continued) |
|
| | | | Notional
| | | Contract
| | | | Net
| | | |
| | | | Amount*
| | | Annual
| | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Reference
| | | | (000’s
| | | Fixed
| | Termination
| | Appreciation
| | | |
Entity | | Counterparty | | omitted) | | | Rate** | | Date | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
Malaysia | | Citigroup Global Markets | | $ | 200 | | | 2.45% | | 3/20/14 | | $ | (13,932) | | | |
|
|
Philippines | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 200 | | | 1.84 | | 12/20/14 | | | (593) | | | |
|
|
Philippines | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 100 | | | 1.84 | | 12/20/14 | | | (297) | | | |
|
|
South Africa | | Bank of America | | | 200 | | | 1.00(1) | | 12/20/19 | | | (382) | | | |
|
|
South Africa | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 200 | | | 1.00(1) | | 12/20/19 | | | (1,792) | | | |
|
|
Thailand | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 200 | | | 0.97 | | 9/20/19 | | | 3,302 | | | |
|
|
Thailand | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 200 | | | 0.86 | | 12/20/14 | | | 2,208 | | | |
|
|
Thailand | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 100 | | | 0.95 | | 9/20/19 | | | 1,815 | | | |
|
|
Thailand | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 100 | | | 0.87 | | 12/20/14 | | | 1,056 | | | |
|
|
Turkey | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 540 | | | 2.12 | | 1/20/13 | | | (13,669) | | | |
|
|
Turkey | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 270 | | | 2.93 | | 9/20/19 | | | (17,273) | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 296,846 | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | If the Portfolio is the seller of credit protection, the notional amount is the maximum potential amount of future payments the Portfolio could be required to make if a credit event, as defined in the credit default swap agreement, were to occur. At October 31,2009, such maximum potential amount for all open credit default swaps in which the Portfolio is the seller was $1,000,000. |
|
** | | The contract annual fixed rate represents the fixed rate of interest received by the Portfolio (as a seller of protection) or paid by the Portfolio (as a buyer of protection) annually on the notional amount of the credit default swap contract. |
|
*** | | Current market annual fixed rates, utilized in determining the net unrealized appreciation or depreciation as of period end, serve as an indicator of the market’s perception of the current status of the payment/performance risk associated with the credit derivative. The current market annual fixed rate of a particular reference entity reflects the cost, as quoted by the pricing vendor, of selling protection against default of that entity as of period end and may include upfront payments required to be made to enter into the agreement. The higher the fixed rate, the greater the market perceived risk of a credit event involving the reference entity. A rate identified as “Defaulted” indicates a credit event has occurred for the reference entity. |
|
(1) | | Upfront payment is exchanged with the counterparty as a result of the standardized trading coupon. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return Swaps |
|
| | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | | | | |
| | Notional
| | Expiration
| | | | Portfolio
| | Unrealized
| | | | | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | Date | | Portfolio Pays | | Receives | | Depreciation | | | | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank | | $93,063 | | 8/25/10 | | 1-month USD- LIBOR-BBA+50bp | | Total Return on JPMorgan Abu Dhabi Index | | $ | (3,236 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | $ | (3,236 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cross-Currency Swaps |
|
| | Notional
| | Notional
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | Amount
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | on Fixed
| | on Floating
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rate
| | Rate
| | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
| | (Currency
| | (Currency
| | Floating
| | Fixed
| | | Termination
| | | Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | Received) | | Delivered) | | Rate | | Rate | | | Date | | | Depreciation | | | |
|
Citigroup Global Markets | | TRY 99,705 | | $61,699 | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 11.95 | % | | | 2/15/12 | | | $ | (14,070 | ) | | |
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets | | TRY 224,285 | | $135,274 | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 12.10 | | | | 2/15/12 | | | | (35,536 | ) | | |
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets | | TRY 318,742 | | $189,727 | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 12.46 | | | | 8/14/13 | | | | (43,384 | ) | | |
|
|
Credit Suisse | | TRY 166,085 | | $95,948 | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 12.45 | | | | 2/15/12 | | | | (30,487 | ) | | |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank | | TRY 402,826 | | $271,996 | | 3-month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 11.20 | | | | 5/21/14 | | | | (11,585 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (135,062 | ) | | |
|
|
TRY - New Turkish Lira
The Portfolio pays interest on the currency received and receives interest on the currency delivered. At the termination date, the notional amount of the currency received will be exchanged for the notional amount of the currency delivered.
Written currency call options activity for the year ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount of Contracts
| | | Premiums
| | | |
| | (000’s omitted) | | | Received | | | |
|
Outstanding, beginning of year | | | JPY 1,099,073 | | | $ | 117,803 | | | |
Options written | | | 1,335,000 | | | | 152,300 | | | |
Options expired | | | (1,099,073 | ) | | | (117,803 | ) | | |
|
|
Outstanding, end of year | | | JPY 1,335,000 | | | $ | 152,300 | | | |
|
|
JPY - Japanese Yen
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815-10), effective May 1, 2009. Such standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures
28
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. The disclosure below includes additional information as a result of implementing FAS 161.
In the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives, the Portfolio is subject to the following risks:
Credit Risk: The Portfolio may enter into credit default swap contracts to manage its credit risk, to gain exposure to a credit in which the Portfolio may otherwise invest, or to enhance return.
Equity Risk: The Portfolio may enter into total return swap agreements on a security, basket of securities or an index to enhance return, to change the duration of the overall portfolio, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities.
Foreign Exchange Risk: The Portfolio holds foreign currency denominated investments. The value of these investments and related receivables and payables may change due to future changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To hedge against this risk, the Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The Portfolio may also enter into such contracts to hedge the currency risk of investments it anticipates purchasing. The Portfolio may also purchase or write currency option contracts to enhance return.
Interest Rate Risk: The Portfolio holds fixed-rate bonds. The value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. To hedge against this risk, the Portfolio may enter into interest rate and cross-currency swap contracts. The Portfolio may also purchase and sell U.S. Treasury and foreign debt futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
The Portfolio enters into swap contracts and forward foreign currency exchange contracts that may contain provisions whereby the counterparty may terminate the contract under certain conditions, including but not limited to a decline in the Portfolio’s net assets below a certain level over a certain period of time, which would trigger a payment by the Portfolio for those derivatives in a liability position. At October 31, 2009, the fair value of derivatives with credit-related contingent features in a net liability position was $202,757.
The non-exchange traded derivatives in which the Portfolio invests, including swap contracts, over-the-counter options and forward foreign currency exchange contracts, are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the contract fails to perform its obligations under the contract. The Portfolio is not subject to counterparty credit risk with respect to its written options as the Portfolio, not the counterparty, is obligated to perform under such derivatives. At October 31, 2009, the maximum amount of loss the Portfolio would incur due to counterparty risk was
$957,166, representing the fair value of such derivatives in an asset position. Such amount would be increased by any unamortized upfront payments made by the Portfolio. To mitigate this risk, the Portfolio has entered into master netting agreements with substantially all its derivative counterparties, which allows it and a counterparty to aggregate amounts owed by each of them for derivative transactions under the agreement into a single net amount payable by either the Portfolio or the counterparty. At October 31, 2009, the maximum amount of loss the Portfolio would incur due to counterparty risk would be reduced by approximately $155,689 due to master netting agreements. Counterparties may be required to pledge collateral in the form of cash, U.S. Government securities or highly-rated bonds for the benefit of the Portfolio if the net amount due from the counterparty with respect to a derivative contract exceeds a certain threshold. The amount of collateral posted by the counterparties with respect to such contracts would also reduce the amount of any loss incurred.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) by risk exposure at October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value | |
Statement of Assets and
| | | | | | | | Foreign
| | | Interest
| |
Liabilities Caption | | Credit | | | Equity | | | Exchange | | | Rate | |
| |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 37,059 | * |
Receivable for open and closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | 571,340 | | | | — | |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | | 385,826 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
|
|
Total Asset Derivatives | | $ | 385,826 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 571,340 | | | $ | 37,059 | |
|
|
Written options outstanding, at value | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (68,963 | ) | | $ | — | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (55,462 | )* |
Payable for open and closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | (120,258 | ) | | | — | |
Payable for open swap contracts | | | (122,073 | ) | | | (3,236 | ) | | | — | | | | (143,717 | ) |
|
|
Total Liability Derivatives | | $ | (122,073 | ) | | $ | (3,236 | ) | | $ | (189,221 | ) | | $ | (199,179 | ) |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount represents cumulative unrealized appreciation or (depreciation) on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) by risk exposure for the six months ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
29
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Foreign
| | | Interest
| |
Statement of Operations Caption | | Credit | | | Equity | | | Exchange | | | Rate | |
| |
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (125,975 | ) |
Written options | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0 | | | | — | |
Swap contracts | | | 8,513 | | | | 19,897 | | | | — | | | | (2,200 | ) |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,738,365 | | | | — | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 8,513 | | | $ | 19,897 | | | $ | 2,738,365 | | | $ | (128,175 | ) |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (95,275 | ) | | $ | — | |
Financial futures contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (46,621 | ) |
Written options | | | — | | | | — | | | | 89,288 | | | | — | |
Swap contracts | | | 44,115 | | | | 2,013 | | | | — | | | | (94,252 | ) |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | 693,433 | | | | — | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 44,115 | | | $ | 2,013 | | | $ | 687,446 | | | $ | (140,873 | ) |
|
|
The average notional amounts of futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts and swap contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009, which are indicative of the volume of these derivative types, were approximately $11,163,000, $43,020,000 and $8,752,000, respectively.
The average principal amount of purchased option contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009 was approximately $9,695,000.
6 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
7 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by entities whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly
available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Portfolio, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign securities markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
8 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
30
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | �� | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Foreign Government Bonds | | $ | — | | | $ | 28,884,496 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 28,884,496 | | | |
Foreign Corporate Bonds | | | — | | | | 168,500 | | | | — | | | | 168,500 | | | |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | | | — | | | | 3,301,564 | | | | — | | | | 3,301,564 | | | |
Mortgage Pass-Throughs | | | — | | | | 18,986,302 | | | | — | | | | 18,986,302 | | | |
Currency Options Purchased | | | — | | | | 5,762 | | | | — | | | | 5,762 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 3,503,113 | | | | 11,188,538 | | | | — | | | | 14,691,651 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 3,503,113 | | | $ | 62,535,162 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 66,038,275 | | | |
|
|
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | $ | — | | | $ | 571,340 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 571,340 | | | |
Swap Contracts | | | — | | | | 385,826 | | | | — | | | | 385,826 | | | |
Futures Contracts | | | 37,059 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 37,059 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 3,540,172 | | | $ | 63,492,328 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 67,032,500 | | | |
|
|
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Currency Options Written | | $ | — | | | $ | (68,963 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (68,963 | ) | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | | — | | | | (120,258 | ) | | | — | | | | (120,258 | ) | | |
Swap Contracts | | | — | | | | (269,026 | ) | | | — | | | | (269,026 | ) | | |
Futures Contracts | | | (55,462 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (55,462 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | (55,462 | ) | | $ | (458,247 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (513,709 | ) | | |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investments
| | | Investments
| | | | | | |
| | in Foreign
| | | in Short-
| | | | | | |
| | Government
| | | Term
| | | | | | |
| | Bonds | | | Investments | | | Total | | | |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 | | $ | 110,275 | | | $ | 101,663 | | | $ | 211,938 | | | |
Realized gains (losses) | | | — | | | | (15,668 | ) | | | (15,668 | ) | | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)* | | | (16,379 | ) | | | 4,545 | | | | (11,834 | ) | | |
Net purchases (sales) | | | — | | | | (90,540 | ) | | | (90,540 | ) | | |
Accrued discount (premium) | | | (238 | ) | | | — | | | | (238 | ) | | |
Net transfers to (from) Level 3 | | | (93,658 | ) | | | — | | | | (93,658 | ) | | |
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments still held as of October 31, 2009* | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount is included in the related amount on investments in the Statement of Operations. |
9 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 28, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
31
International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
International Income Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of International Income Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the two years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of International Income Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the two years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 2009
32
Eaton Vance International Income Fund
International Income Portfolio
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited)
Eaton Vance International Income Fund
The Fund held a joint Special Meeting of Shareholders on October 23, 2009 (adjourned from September 25, 2009) to approve an amendment to the current fundamental investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale of physical commodities and commodities contracts to provide that the Fund may invest in all types of commodities, commodities contracts and commodities related investments to the extent permitted by law. The following action was taken by the shareholders:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Number of Shares
| | | | | | |
For | | Against | | | Abstain | | | |
| | | |
|
202,348 | | | 5,775 | | | | 21,151 | | | |
International Income Portfolio
The Portfolio held a joint Special Meeting of Interestholders on October 23, 2009 (adjourned from September 25, 2009) to approve an amendment to the current fundamental investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale of physical commodities and commodities contracts to provide that the Portfolio may invest in all types of commodities, commodities contracts and commodities related investments to the extent permitted by law. The following action was taken by the interestholders:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Interest in the Portfolio
| | | | | | |
For | | Against | | | Abstain | | | |
| | | |
|
79% | | �� | 5 | % | | | 8 | % | | |
Results are rounded to the nearest whole number.
33
Eaton Vance International Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
34
Eaton Vance International Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Eaton Vance International Income Fund (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”), as well as the terms of the investment advisory agreement of International Income Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), the portfolio in which the Fund invests, with Boston Management and Research (“BMR”), an affiliate of EVM (EVM, with respect to the Fund, and BMR, with respect to the Portfolio, are each referred to herein as the “Adviser”), including the fee structure of each agreement, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreements. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreements. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve the investment advisory agreements for the Fund and the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreements of the Fund and the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services to be provided to the Fund by EVM and the Portfolio by BMR.
The Board considered EVM’s and BMR’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments to be held by the Fund and the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio and the Fund, including recent changes to such personnel. The Board specifically noted EVM’s and BMR’s expertise with respect to global markets and in-house research capabilities. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund and Portfolio in the complex by senior management.
The Board noted that under the terms of the investment advisory agreement of the Fund, EVM may invest assets of the Fund directly in securities, for which it may receive a fee, or in the Portfolio, for which it receives no separate fee but for which BMR receives an advisory fee from the Portfolio. The Trustees considered the potential benefits to the Fund of the ability to make direct investments, such as an improved ability to: manage the Fund’s duration, or other general market exposures, using certain derivatives; add exposure to specific market sectors or asset classes without changing the Portfolio’s investments, which would affect any other fund investing in the Portfolio; hedge some of the general market risks of the Portfolio while retaining the value added by the individual manager; and hedge a portion of the exposures of the Portfolio while retaining others (e.g., hedging the U.S. government exposure of the Portfolio while retaining its exposure to high-grade corporate bonds).
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio
35
Eaton Vance International Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by EVM and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreements.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-year period ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates to be paid by the Fund directly or indirectly through its pro rata share of the expenses of the Portfolio (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Fund’s management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered the fact that the Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses for the Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees proposed to be charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Portfolio, the Fund and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Portfolio and the Fund.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund and the Portfolio, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolios increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. The Board noted the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels both at the Fund and at the Portfolio level. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund and the Portfolio can be expected to share such benefits equitably.
36
Eaton Vance International Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and International Income Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2003 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 2003 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004- 2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
37
Eaton Vance International Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 1998 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee of the Portfolio since 2007 and Trustee of the Trust since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President | | Of the Trust since 2008 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President | | Of the Trust since 2008 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
38
Eaton Vance International Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President | | Of the Trust since 2002 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust since 2004 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
39
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of
International Income Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Investment Adviser and Administrator ofEaton Vance International Income Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance International Income FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Susan Schiff, CFA
Portfolio Manager
Economic and Market Conditions
• | | The year ending October 31, 2009, began on a weak note of deep economic downturn and volatile credit markets. However, the markets and economy showed some positive signs of stabilization as they turned to the 2009 calendar year. Despite significantly negative growth in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, second quarter gross domestic product (GDP) fell just 0.7%. The preliminary numbers for the third quarter of 2009 point to positive annualized GDP growth of 2.8%. |
• | | Throughout the Fund’s fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, the Federal Reserve (the Fed) maintained policy rates between 0% and 0.25%. At its most recent meeting, the Fed identified the high unemployment rate and low capacity utilization rates as indicators of excess or spare capacity in the economy, creating the ability to grow above trend for some time without threatening the outlook for inflation. Although yields have been relatively constant in the long end of the yield curve during the Fund’s fiscal year, yields in the rest of the yield curve have fallen by 50-90 basis points over the period. |
• | | Many of the government’s programs aimed at bolstering the economy came into full swing during the period. Some of these programs have been specifically directed at freeing up capital and providing access to credit. Other programs have more specifically targeted helping existing homeowners avoid foreclosure and maintaining affordability for new homeowners. One of the most significant steps taken was the Fed’s purchase of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) in the secondary market. This program started in January 2009 and was designed to sustain lower mortgage rates. By the end of October 2009, the Fed purchased just under $1 trillion in U.S. Government Agency MBS. The Fed expects to purchase a total of $1.25 trillion in MBS by the end of March 2010. |
• | | The bank loan market experienced unprecedented volatility in the early months of the period but staged a remarkable turnaround beginning in January 2009. In the first two months of the period, there was little doubt that a recession would bring higher default rates; but it was difficult to reconcile bank loan prices with market fundamentals. By the turn of the new year, however, the markets began to rebound as credit spreads tightened from record levels and investors returned to the credit markets. |
• | | As the economy has stabilized, so too have the credit markets. Although the beginning of the fiscal period was marked by widening credit spreads throughout the fixed-income markets, there was a tightening of spreads for the better part of calendar 2009. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
• | | The Fund1 seeks total return, an objective it pursues primarily through investments in securities issued by the U.S. government (or its agencies and instrumentalities) and at least 90% of the Fund’s net assets are invested in investment-grade securities. |
• | | During the year ending October 31, 2009, the Fund outperformed the BofA Merrill Lynch 1-3 Year Treasury Index and the average return of the Lipper |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08 – 10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A2 | | | 9.57 | % |
Class B2 | | | 8.71 | |
Class C2 | | | 8.89 | |
Class I2 | | | 4.34 | * |
BofA Merrill Lynch 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Index3 | | | 2.73 | |
Lipper Short U.S. Government Funds Average3 | | | 5.63 | |
| | |
* | | Performance is cumulative since share class inception on 5/4/09. |
|
See page 3 for more performance information. |
|
1 | | The Fund pursues its objective by investing in one or more registered investment companies (each a “Portfolio”) that are managed by Eaton Vance Management or its affiliates. The Fund currently invests in Investment Portfolio, Government Obligations Portfolio and Floating Rate Portfolio (collectively, the “Portfolios”). Effective November 16, 2009, the Fund may invest in Multi-Sector Portfolio. References to investments are to the Portfolios’ holdings. |
|
2 | | These returns do not include the 2.25% maximum sales charge for the Fund’s Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B shares and Class C shares. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value (NAV). If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Absent a fee waiver and expense reimbursement by the investment adviser and administrator, the returns would be lower. |
|
3 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper average is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
1
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
| | Short U.S. Government Funds Classification. The Fund’s outperformance was primarily the result of an approximate 10% allocation to bank loans in Floating Rate Portfolio and a substantial tightening in the yield spreads between MBS and Treasuries. In the seasoned MBS market on which the Fund focuses, this spread tightened by more than 140 basis points during the fiscal year. Principal prepayment rates on the Fund’s seasoned MBS were relatively stable for the entire period—paying consistently at an annualized rate in the low teens. |
|
• | | Bank loan performance, as measured by the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index (the Index) returned 46.90% for the first 10 months of 2009, the highest 10-month performance in the history of the asset class. For the fiscal year, this Index returned 30.44%. Performance was driven by a combination of technical factors, which improved the market’s demand and supply picture. On the supply side, limited new loan issuance and a contraction of the existing supply through loan repayments reduced the available universe of purchasable loans. Matched with little selling activity and modest but steady inflows, loan prices improved significantly. |
|
• | | The Fund’s investment emphasis remained on seasoned, U.S. Government Agency MBS (seasoned MBS) during the entire period. Typically, seasoned MBS were originated in the 1980s and 1990s. As a result, they have generally lower loan-to-home value ratios, meaning that these homeowners have more equity in their homes than the average borrower. In addition, these loans are guaranteed by government agencies. Within the seasoned MBS market, the Fund focused on seasoned adjustable-rate mortages (seasoned ARMs). Toward the end of the period, the Fund added exposure to U.S. Government Agency for International Development (AID) bonds and U.S. Government Agency debentures. Both of these additions were made because of management’s belief that these areas represented relative value within the Fund’s allowable markets. The Fund had no direct exposure to the subprime lending market or to nonagency MBS during the period. |
|
• | | As the economy has slowly shown signs of stabilization and positive growth, the Fund shortened its duration from 1.91 years at the beginning of the 12-month period to 1.51 years as of October 31, 2009. Duration indicates price sensitivity to changes in interest rates of a fixed-income security or portfolio based on the timing of anticipated principal and interest payments. A shorter duration instrument normally has less exposure to interest-rate risk than a longer duration instrument. |
Portfolio Composition
Diversification by Sectors2
By total investments
2 | | The Diversification by Sectors breakdown reflects the Fund’s investments in Investment Portfolio, Government Obligations Portfolio and Floating Rate Portfolio as of 10/31/09. Sectors are shown as a percentage of the Fund’s total investments in the Portfolios. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio manager and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information may not be representative of the Portfolios’ current or future investments and may change due to active management.
2
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the BofA Merrill Lynch 1-3 Year Treasury Index, an unmanaged market index of short-term U.S. Treasury securities and the Lipper Short U.S. Government Funds Classification. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A, the BofA Merrill Lynch 1-3 Year Treasury Index and the Lipper Short U.S. Government Funds Classification. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Class Share Symbol | | EALDX | | EBLDX | | ECLDX | | EILDX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
One year | | | 9.57 | % | | | 8.71 | % | | | 8.89 | % | | | N.A. | |
Five years | | | 4.33 | | | | 3.55 | | | | 3.71 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.31 | | | | 2.54 | | | | 2.70 | | | | 4.34 | %†† |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
|
One year | | | 7.12 | % | | | 5.71 | % | | | 7.89 | % | | | N.A. | |
Five years | | | 3.85 | | | | 3.55 | | | | 3.71 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 2.98 | | | | 2.54 | | | | 2.70 | | | | 4.34 | %†† |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates – Class A: 9/30/02; Class B: 9/30/02; Class C: 9/30/02; Class I: 5/4/09 |
|
†† | | Returns are cumulative since inception of share class. |
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 2.25% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Absent a fee waiver and expense reimbursement by the investment adviser and administrator, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 2.25% sales charge. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 3% — 1st year; 2.5% — 2nd year; 2.0% — 3rd year; 1% — 4th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at NAV. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Gross Expense Ratio | | | 1.30 | % | | | 2.05 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 1.05 | % |
Net Expense Ratio | | | 1.00 | | | | 1.75 | | | | 1.60 | | | | 0.75 | |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09, as supplemented on 5/4/09. The net expense ratio reflects a contractual expense reimbursement that continues through 4/30/10. Thereafter, the expense reimbursement may be changed or terminated at any time. Without this expense reimbursement, expenses would be higher. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61b03/61b0385d19f68eecf7a6d3bfbbe974f56fa51c80" alt="(LINE CHART)"
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced operations on 9/30/02. |
|
A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class B and Class C shares on 9/30/02 (commencement of operations) and Class I shares on 5/4/09 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $11,945, $12,078 and $10,434, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at NAV, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
3
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,043.60 | | | | $5.15 | *** | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,039.70 | | | | $9.00 | *** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,040.50 | | | | $8.23 | *** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,043.40 | | | | $3.86 | *** | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.20 | | | | $5.09 | *** | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.40 | | | | $8.89 | *** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.10 | | | | $8.13 | *** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.40 | | | | $3.82 | *** | | |
| | | |
| * | Class I had not commenced operations as of May 1, 2009. Actual expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.00% for Class A shares, 1.75% for Class B shares, 1.60% for Class C shares and 0.75% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 for Class A, Class B and Class C (to reflect the one-half year period) and by 181/365 for Class I (to reflect the period from commencement of operations on May 4, 2009 to October 31, 2009). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009 (May 1, 2009 for Class I). This Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolios. | |
|
| ** | Hypothetical expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.00% for Class A shares, 1.75% for Class B shares, 1.60% for Class C shares and 0.75% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009 (May 1, 2009 for Class I). This Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolios. | |
|
| *** | Absent a fee waiver and expense reimbursement by affiliate, the expenses would be higher. | |
4
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Investment Portfolio, at value (indentified cost, $303,875,904) | | $ | 308,962,899 | | | |
Investment in Floating Rate Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $29,834,327) | | | 32,316,735 | | | |
Investment in Government Obligations Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $30,309,160) | | | 31,161,269 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 6,995,463 | | | |
Receivable from affiliate | | | 36,265 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 379,472,631 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 1,287,570 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 210,410 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 126,635 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 40 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 109,107 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,733,762 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 377,738,869 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 380,320,604 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolios | | | (10,785,220 | ) | | |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income | | | (218,027 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolios | | | 8,421,512 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 377,738,869 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 254,074,387 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 27,745,492 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.16 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 97.75 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 9.37 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 8,338,432 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 909,477 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.17 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 100,969,620 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 11,015,602 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.17 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 14,356,430 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 1,569,084 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.15 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $100,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
Statement of Operations
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest and dividends allocated from Portfolios | | $ | 8,429,662 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolios | | | (1,261,214 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolios | | $ | 7,168,448 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 360,883 | | | |
Class B | | | 78,652 | | | |
Class C | | | 486,010 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 42,857 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 158,672 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 41,465 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 69,409 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 96,190 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 12,284 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 1,346,922 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Allocation of expenses to affiliate | | $ | 102,113 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 102,113 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 1,244,809 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 5,923,639 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolios |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | 768,268 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (552,457 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | (206,558 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized gain | | $ | 9,253 | | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 12,348,572 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (316,008 | ) | | |
Foreign currency | | | (11,382 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 12,021,182 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 12,030,435 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 17,954,074 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 5,923,639 | | | $ | 2,864,168 | | | |
Net realized gain from investment transactions, financial futures contracts and foreign currency transactions | | | 9,253 | | | | 391,632 | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, financial futures contracts and foreign currency | | | 12,021,182 | | | | (3,603,285 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 17,954,074 | | | $ | (347,485 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (5,345,710 | ) | | $ | (2,147,624 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (242,870 | ) | | | (175,922 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (1,808,951 | ) | | | (1,078,108 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (13,006 | ) | | | — | | | |
Tax return of capital | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (625,003 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class B | | | (28,395 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class C | | | (211,496 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class I | | | (1,521 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (8,276,952 | ) | | $ | (3,401,654 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 246,909,769 | | | $ | 71,624,537 | | | |
Class B | | | 7,254,246 | | | | 8,918,235 | | | |
Class C | | | 82,195,986 | | | | 31,558,084 | | | |
Class I | | | 14,721,450 | | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 4,219,076 | | | | 1,062,849 | | | |
Class B | | | 173,867 | | | | 99,581 | | | |
Class C | | | 1,480,956 | | | | 729,640 | | | |
Class I | | | 5,024 | | | | — | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (78,601,217 | ) | | | (22,652,104 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (3,110,031 | ) | | | (2,254,370 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (19,819,488 | ) | | | (12,979,859 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (388,341 | ) | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 3,657,079 | | | | 2,621,839 | | | |
Class B | | | (3,657,079 | ) | | | (2,621,839 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 255,041,297 | | | $ | 76,106,593 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 264,718,419 | | | $ | 72,357,454 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 113,020,450 | | | $ | 40,662,996 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 377,738,869 | | | $ | 113,020,450 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | (218,027 | ) | | $ | (163,840 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 8.720 | | | $ | 8.990 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 9.220 | | | $ | 9.420 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.270 | | | $ | 0.344 | | | $ | 0.397 | | | $ | 0.333 | | | $ | 0.224 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.549 | | | | (0.191 | ) | | | 0.028 | | | | 0.002 | | | | (0.033 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 0.819 | | | $ | 0.153 | | | $ | 0.425 | | | $ | 0.335 | | | $ | 0.191 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.339 | ) | | $ | (0.423 | ) | | $ | (0.482 | ) | | $ | (0.495 | ) | | $ | (0.391 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | (0.040 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.013 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.379 | ) | | $ | (0.423 | ) | | $ | (0.495 | ) | | $ | (0.495 | ) | | $ | (0.391 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 9.160 | | | $ | 8.720 | | | $ | 8.990 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 9.220 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 9.57 | % | | | 1.65 | % | | | 4.82 | % | | | 3.74 | % | | | 2.06 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 254,074 | | | $ | 71,284 | | | $ | 20,998 | | | $ | 21,157 | | | $ | 23,876 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4)(5) | | | 1.00 | % | | | 1.00 | % | | | 1.17 | % | | | 1.29 | % | | | 1.24 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.99 | % | | | 3.83 | % | | | 4.40 | % | | | 3.65 | % | | | 2.41 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Investment Portfolio | | | 34 | % | | | 24 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 46 | % | | | 67 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Government Obligations Portfolio | | | 28 | % | | | 19 | % | | | n/a | | | | 2 | % | | | 30 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser waived its investment adviser and administration fee and/or the administrator reimbursed expenses (equal to 0.05%, 0.30%, 0.39%, 0.15% and 0.15% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively). |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 8.730 | | | $ | 9.000 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 9.210 | | | $ | 9.420 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.219 | | | $ | 0.290 | | | $ | 0.330 | | | $ | 0.266 | | | $ | 0.153 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.530 | | | | (0.208 | ) | | | 0.036 | | | | 0.010 | | | | (0.043 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 0.749 | | | $ | 0.082 | | | $ | 0.366 | | | $ | 0.276 | | | $ | 0.110 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.277 | ) | | $ | (0.352 | ) | | $ | (0.413 | ) | | $ | (0.426 | ) | | $ | (0.320 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | (0.032 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.013 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.309 | ) | | $ | (0.352 | ) | | $ | (0.426 | ) | | $ | (0.426 | ) | | $ | (0.320 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 9.170 | | | $ | 8.730 | | | $ | 9.000 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 9.210 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 8.71 | % | | | 0.85 | % | | | 4.14 | % | | | 3.07 | % | | | 1.18 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 8,338 | | | $ | 7,290 | | | $ | 3,367 | | | $ | 6,491 | | | $ | 9,704 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4)(5) | | | 1.75 | % | | | 1.75 | % | | | 1.92 | % | | | 2.04 | % | | | 1.99 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.44 | % | | | 3.22 | % | | | 3.66 | % | | | 2.91 | % | | | 1.64 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Investment Portfolio | | | 34 | % | | | 24 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 46 | % | | | 67 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Government Obligations Portfolio | | | 28 | % | | | 19 | % | | | n/a | | | | 2 | % | | | 30 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser waived its investment adviser and administration fee and/or the administrator reimbursed expenses (equal to 0.05%, 0.30%, 0.39%, 0.15% and 0.15% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively). |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 8.730 | | | $ | 9.000 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 9.220 | | | $ | 9.420 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.218 | | | $ | 0.299 | | | $ | 0.342 | | | $ | 0.277 | | | $ | 0.167 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.546 | | | | (0.203 | ) | | | 0.038 | | | | 0.003 | | | | (0.033 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 0.764 | | | $ | 0.096 | | | $ | 0.380 | | | $ | 0.280 | | | $ | 0.134 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.290 | ) | | $ | (0.366 | ) | | $ | (0.427 | ) | | $ | (0.440 | ) | | $ | (0.334 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | (0.034 | ) | | | — | | | | (0.013 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.324 | ) | | $ | (0.366 | ) | | $ | (0.440 | ) | | $ | (0.440 | ) | | $ | (0.334 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 9.170 | | | $ | 8.730 | | | $ | 9.000 | | | $ | 9.060 | | | $ | 9.220 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 8.89 | % | | | 1.02 | % | | | 4.30 | % | | | 3.12 | % | | | 1.45 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 100,970 | | | $ | 34,447 | | | $ | 16,298 | | | $ | 14,937 | | | $ | 25,050 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4)(5) | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.78 | % | | | 1.89 | % | | | 1.84 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.42 | % | | | 3.32 | % | | | 3.80 | % | | | 3.04 | % | | | 1.79 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Investment Portfolio | | | 34 | % | | | 24 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 46 | % | | | 67 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 61 | % | | | 50 | % | | | 57 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Government Obligations Portfolio | | | 28 | % | | | 19 | % | | | n/a | | | | 2 | % | | | 30 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser waived its investment adviser and administration fee and/or the administrator reimbursed expenses (equal to 0.05%, 0.30%, 0.39%, 0.15% and 0.15% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively). |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.970 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.134 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | | 0.242 | | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 0.376 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.175 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | (0.021 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.196 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 4.34 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 14,356 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6)(7) | | | 0.75 | %(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.95 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Investment Portfolio | | | 34 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 35 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of Government Obligations Portfolio | | | 28 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, May 4, 2009, to October 31, 2009. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolios’ allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser waived its investment adviser and administration fee and the administrator reimbursed expenses (equal to 0.07% for the period ended October 31, 2009). |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
|
(9) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares four years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund’s investment objective is to seek total return. The Fund currently pursues its objective by investing all of its investable assets in interests in the following three portfolios managed by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) or its affiliates: Investment Portfolio, Floating Rate Portfolio and Government Obligations Portfolio (the Portfolios), which are New York trusts. Effective November 16, 2009, the Fund may invest in another portfolio managed by EVM or its affiliates, Multi-Sector Portfolio, which is a New York Trust. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolios reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of Investment Portfolio, Floating Rate Portfolio and Government Obligations Portfolio (92.5%, 0.8% and 3.3%, respectively, at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolios. The financial statements of Investment Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements. A copy of each Portfolio’s financial statements is available on the EDGAR database on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website (www.sec.gov), at the Commission’s public reference room in Washington, DC or upon request from the Fund’s principal underwriter, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), by calling 1-800-225-6265.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by Investment Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of Investment Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report. Such policies are consistent with those of Floating Rate Portfolio and Government Obligations Portfolio for applicable investments.
Additional valuation policies for Floating Rate Portfolio are as follows: The Portfolio’s investments are primarily in interests in senior floating-rate loans (Senior Loans) of domestic and foreign issues. Interests in Senior Loans for which reliable market quotations are readily available are valued generally at the average mean of bid and ask quotations obtained from a third party pricing service. Other Senior Loans are valued at fair value by the investment adviser under procedures approved by the Trustees. In fair valuing a Senior Loan, the investment adviser utilizes one or more of the valuation techniques described in (i) through (iii) below to assess the likelihood that the borrower will make a full repayment of the loan underlying such Senior Loan relative to yields on other Senior Loans issued by companies of comparable credit quality. If the investment adviser believes that there is a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using a matrix pricing approach that considers the yield on the Senior Loan. If the investment adviser believes there is not a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using analyses that include, but are not limited to: (i) a comparison of the value of the borrower’s outstanding equity and debt to that of comparable public companies; (ii) a discounted cash flow analysis; or (iii) when the investment adviser believes it is likely that a borrower will be liquidated or sold, an analysis of the terms of such liquidation or sale. In certain cases, the investment adviser will use a combination of analytical methods to determine fair value, such as when only a portion of a borrower’s assets are likely to be sold. In conducting its assessment and analyses for purposes of determining fair value of a Senior Loan, the investment adviser will use its discretion and judgment in considering and appraising relevant factors. Fair value determinations are made by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio based on information available to such managers. The portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may not possess the same information about a Senior Loan borrower as the
11
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
portfolio managers of the Portfolio. At times, the fair value of a Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may vary from the fair value of the same Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio. The fair value of each Senior Loan is periodically reviewed and approved by the investment adviser’s Valuation Committee and by the Trustees based upon procedures approved by the Trustees. Junior Loans are valued in the same manner as Senior Loans.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $11,344,560 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2010 ($5,478), October 31, 2011 ($4,082,489), October 31, 2012 ($3,697,770), October 31, 2013 ($1,016,104), October 31, 2014 ($811,882), October 31, 2015 ($374,820), October 31, 2016 ($594,536) and October 31, 2017 ($761,481), respectively.
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund declares dividends daily to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are generally paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any) are made at least annually. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
12
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 7,410,537 | | | $ | 3,401,654 | | | |
Tax return of capital | | $ | 866,415 | | | $ | — | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was increased by $285,820, accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income was decreased by $1,432,711, and paid-in capital was decreased by $1,146,891 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for paydown gain (loss), premium amortization, mixed straddles, swap contracts and foreign currency gain (loss). These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (11,344,560 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 8,973,235 | | | |
Other temporary differences | | $ | (210,410 | ) | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, partnership allocations, futures contracts, premium amortization, defaulted bonds and the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
EVM serves as the investment adviser and administrator of the Fund, providing investment advisory services (relating to the investment of the Fund’s assets in the Portfolios), and administering the business affairs of the Fund. Pursuant to the investment advisory and administrative agreement, and subsequent fee waiver agreement between the Fund and EVM, the fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of Fund’s average daily net assets, all of which is waived. The fee waiver agreement may not be amended or terminated without the approval of the Fund’s Trustees and shareholders. The Portfolios have engaged BMR to render investment advisory services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund’s allocated portion of the adviser fees paid by the Portfolios was 0.52% of the Fund’s average daily net assets and amounted to $1,084,706. EVM has agreed to reimburse the Fund’s operating expenses to the extent that they exceed 1.00%, 1.75%, 1.60% and 0.75% annually of the Fund’s average daily net assets for Class A, Class B, Class C and Class I, respectively. This agreement may be changed or terminated after April 30, 2010. Pursuant to this agreement, EVM was allocated $102,113 of the Fund’s operating expenses for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $6,997 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that EVD, an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $32,895 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolios who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $360,883 for Class A shares. The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% and 0.60% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares, respectively, for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts therefore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $58,989 and $343,152 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% and 0.60% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares, respectively. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $1,083,000 and
13
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
$9,191,000, respectively. The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $19,663 and $142,858 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within four years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 3% in the case of redemptions in the first year of purchase, declining to 2.5% in the second year, 2.0% in the third year, 1.0% in the fourth year and 0.0% thereafter. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $26,000 and $24,000 of CDSCs paid by Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively, and no CDSCs paid by Class A shareholders.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolios were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Portfolio | | Contributions | | | Withdrawals | | | |
|
Investment Portfolio | | $ | 284,318,648 | | | $ | 77,680,645 | | | |
Floating Rate Portfolio | | | 20,518,476 | | | | 2,623,175 | | | |
Government Obligations Portfolio | | | 15,000,000 | | | | — | | | |
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 27,392,705 | | | | 7,957,272 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 466,994 | | | | 118,417 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (8,697,663 | ) | | | (2,526,339 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 407,607 | | | | 291,779 | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 19,569,643 | | | | 5,841,129 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 810,562 | | | | 993,068 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 19,328 | | | | 11,079 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (349,604 | ) | | | (251,491 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (406,294 | ) | | | (291,403 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 73,992 | | | | 461,253 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 9,113,096 | | | | 3,499,909 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 164,235 | | | | 81,211 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (2,209,769 | ) | | | (1,444,738 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 7,067,562 | | | | 2,136,382 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Period Ended
| | | | | | |
Class I | | October 31, 2009(1) | | | | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,611,035 | | | | | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 550 | | | | | | | |
Redemptions | | | (42,501 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 1,569,084 | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class I commenced operations on May 4, 2009. |
14
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
8 Fair Value Measurements
The Fund adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| |
• | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the Fund’s investments in Floating Rate Portfolio and Government Obligations Portfolio, whose financial statements are not included but are available elsewhere as discussed in Note 1, were valued based on Level 1 inputs.
9 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 28, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
15
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust
and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Low Duration
Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The financial highlights for the year ended October 31, 2006, and all prior periods presented, were audited by other auditors. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial highlights in their report dated December 27, 2006.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 2009
16
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund.
17
Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage Pass-Throughs — 66.8% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | | | | | | | | | |
2.723%, with various maturities to 2037(1) | | $ | 2,716 | | | $ | 2,786,586 | | | |
2.849%, with various maturities to 2022(1) | | | 5,604 | | | | 5,717,908 | | | |
2.962%, with maturity at 2035(1) | | | 9,280 | | | | 9,467,073 | | | |
3.003%, with maturity at 2035(1) | | | 6,590 | | | | 6,806,221 | | | |
3.183%, with maturity at 2034(1) | | | 3,199 | | | | 3,324,515 | | | |
3.501%, with maturity at 2032(1) | | | 2,681 | | | | 2,743,592 | | | |
3.568%, with maturity at 2029(1) | | | 1,949 | | | | 1,990,096 | | | |
3.841%, with maturity at 2034(1) | | | 1,413 | | | | 1,470,154 | | | |
4.072%, with maturity at 2022(1) | | | 688 | | | | 705,902 | | | |
4.11%, with maturity at 2037(1) | | | 3,494 | | | | 3,635,702 | | | |
4.34%, with maturity at 2030(1) | | | 2,588 | | | | 2,692,830 | | | |
4.442%, with maturity at 2025(1) | | | 2,676 | | | | 2,770,637 | | | |
5.00%, with maturity at 2014 | | | 1,637 | | | | 1,731,208 | | | |
5.50%, with various maturities to 2017 | | | 1,786 | | | | 1,911,232 | | | |
6.00%, with various maturities to 2035(2) | | | 24,434 | | | | 26,207,966 | | | |
6.50%, with various maturities to 2030 | | | 1,209 | | | | 1,303,106 | | | |
7.00%, with various maturities to 2035 | | | 3,241 | | | | 3,589,104 | | | |
7.50%, with various maturities to 2017 | | | 2,584 | | | | 2,771,146 | | | |
8.00%, with various maturities to 2025 | | | 682 | | | | 765,686 | | | |
9.25%, with maturity at 2017 | | | 8 | | | | 9,168 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 82,399,832 | | | |
|
|
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | |
2.662%, with various maturities to 2027(1) | | $ | 1,179 | | | $ | 1,209,702 | | | |
2.723%, with various maturities to 2035(1) | | | 7,387 | | | | 7,578,758 | | | |
2.735%, with maturity at 2020(1) | | | 1,186 | | | | 1,199,791 | | | |
2.763%, with maturity at 2031(1) | | | 9,783 | | | | 10,000,717 | | | |
3.027%, with maturity at 2037(1) | | | 7,756 | | | | 8,025,514 | | | |
3.178%, with maturity at 2036(1) | | | 876 | | | | 897,857 | | | |
3.397%, with maturity at 2018(1) | | | 123 | | | | 125,041 | | | |
3.622%, with maturity at 2036(1) | | | 3,256 | | | | 3,332,323 | | | |
3.661%, with maturity at 2019(1) | | | 3,389 | | | | 3,483,847 | | | |
3.691%, with maturity at 2034(1) | | | 9,808 | | | | 10,206,885 | | | |
3.814%, with maturity at 2030(1) | | | 1,626 | | | | 1,664,444 | | | |
3.828%, with maturity at 2035(1) | | | 4,287 | | | | 4,461,408 | | | |
3.925%, with maturity at 2021(1) | | | 2,606 | | | | 2,684,389 | | | |
3.929%, with maturity at 2036(1) | | | 925 | | | | 952,888 | | | |
3.933%, with maturity at 2034(1) | | | 6,393 | | | | 6,652,794 | | | |
4.104%, with maturity at 2033(1) | | | 2,281 | | | | 2,373,570 | | | |
4.125%, with maturity at 2018(1) | | | 108 | | | | 109,775 | | | |
4.293%, with maturity at 2021(1) | | | 1,633 | | | | 1,685,141 | | | |
4.418%, with maturity at 2036(1) | | | 5,235 | | | | 5,447,234 | | | |
4.419%, with maturity at 2035(1) | | | 3,087 | | | | 3,212,362 | | | |
4.492%, with maturity at 2040(1) | | | 2,487 | | | | 2,592,515 | | | |
4.50%, with various maturities to 2018 | | | 17,788 | | | | 18,652,772 | | | |
4.76%, with maturity at 2034(1) | | | 2,224 | | | | 2,313,926 | | | |
4.897%, with maturity at 2034(1) | | | 7,177 | | | | 7,468,755 | | | |
5.00%, with various maturities to 2018 | | | 2,793 | | | | 2,942,451 | | | |
5.50%, with various maturities to 2017 | | | 6,478 | | | | 6,909,044 | | | |
6.00%, with various maturities to 2031 | | | 7,694 | | | | 8,232,294 | | | |
6.32%, with maturity at 2032(1) | | | 971 | | | | 1,010,527 | | | |
6.50%, with various maturities to 2019 | | | 2,512 | | | | 2,657,060 | | | |
7.00%, with various maturities to 2033 | | | 7,447 | | | | 8,194,210 | | | |
8.00%, with maturity at 2023 | | | 242 | | | | 277,543 | | | |
9.00%, with maturity at 2011 | | | 4 | | | | 4,406 | | | |
9.50%, with maturity at 2022 | | | 939 | | | | 1,102,832 | | | |
9.575%, with maturity at 2018(3) | | | 609 | | | | 702,727 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 138,365,502 | | | |
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | |
4.125%, with various maturities to 2027(1) | | $ | 1,320 | | | $ | 1,361,676 | | | |
8.25%, with maturity at 2020 | | | 426 | | | | 488,633 | | | |
9.00%, with maturity at 2017 | | | 487 | | | | 556,077 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,406,386 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Mortgage Pass-Throughs | | |
(identified cost $218,297,062) | | $ | 223,171,720 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations — 7.7% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | | | | | | | | | |
Series 1395, Class F, 2.062%, 10/15/22(4) | | $ | 136 | | | $ | 132,316 | | | |
Series 2135, Class JZ, 6.00%, 3/15/29 | | | 7,835 | | | | 8,416,305 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,548,621 | | | |
|
|
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | |
Series G93-17, Class FA, 1.281%, 4/25/23(4) | | $ | 286 | | | $ | 291,436 | | | |
Series G93-36, Class ZQ, 6.50%, 12/25/23 | | | 1,343 | | | | 1,456,077 | | | |
Series G97-4, Class FA, 1.081%, 6/17/27(4) | | | 922 | | | | 932,969 | | | |
Series 296, (Interest Only), Class 2, 8.00%, 4/1/24(5) | | | 4,115 | | | | 982,641 | | | |
Series 1993-203, Class PL, 6.50%, 10/25/23 | | | 1,760 | | | | 1,917,607 | | | |
Series 1993-250, Class Z, 7.00%, 12/25/23 | | | 510 | | | | 554,959 | | | |
Series 2001-4, Class GA, 10.048%, 4/17/25(3) | | | 342 | | | | 391,775 | | | |
Series 2009-48, Class WA, 5.844%, 7/25/39(3) | | | 3,492 | | | | 3,742,467 | | | |
Series 2009-62, Class WA, 5.557%, 8/25/39(3) | | | 4,832 | | | | 5,153,160 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,423,091 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements18
Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | |
Series 2000-30, Class F, 0.795%, 12/16/22(4) | | $ | 1,681 | | | $ | 1,692,691 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | | |
(identified cost $25,010,065) | | $ | 25,664,403 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities — 8.9% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
BSCMS, Series 2004-PWR5, Class A3, 4.565%, 7/11/42 | | $ | 3,500 | | | $ | 3,506,274 | | | |
COMM, Series 2005-LP5, Class A2, 4.63%, 5/10/43 | | | 3,050 | | | | 3,062,330 | | | |
CSFB, Series 2001-CK1, Class A3, 6.38%, 12/18/35 | | | 3,619 | | | | 3,736,186 | | | |
CSFB, Series 2005-C4, Class A2, 5.017%, 8/15/38 | | | 3,100 | | | | 3,115,214 | | | |
GECMC, Series 2002-3A, Class A1, 4.229%, 12/10/37 | | | 1,028 | | | | 1,037,196 | | | |
GMACC, Series 2002-C2, Class A2, 5.389%, 10/15/38 | | | 638 | | | | 658,009 | | | |
JPMCC, Series 2004-CBX, Class A4, 4.529%, 1/12/37 | | | 7,000 | | | | 7,056,803 | | | |
LB-UBS, Series 2004-C2, Class A2, 3.246%, 3/15/29 | | | 1,996 | | | | 1,999,713 | | | |
MLMT, Series 2006-C2, Class A1, 5.601%, 8/12/43 | | | 394 | | | | 401,645 | | | |
SBM7, Series 2000-C1, Class A2, 7.52%, 2/18/32(3) | | | 180 | | | | 179,799 | | | |
SBM7, Series 2000-C3, Class A2, 6.592%, 12/18/33 | | | 4,781 | | | | 4,888,763 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | | |
(identified cost $29,421,690) | | $ | 29,641,932 | | | |
|
|
U.S. Government Agency Obligations — 9.6% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank, 5.365%, 9/9/24 | | $ | 8,000 | | | $ | 8,628,720 | | | |
United States Agency for International Development - Israel, 0.00%, with various maturities to 2021 | | | 35,890 | | | | 23,560,454 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total U.S. Government Agency Obligations | | |
(identified cost $31,956,115) | | $ | 32,189,174 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury Obligations — 9.0% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
U.S. Treasury Notes, 1.375%, 9/15/12 | | $ | 30,000 | | | $ | 30,011,730 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total U.S. Treasury Obligations | | |
(identified cost $29,911,194) | | $ | 30,011,730 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 9.3% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(6) | | $ | 30,908 | | | $ | 30,907,565 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $30,907,565) | | $ | 30,907,565 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 111.3% | | |
(identified cost $365,503,691) | | $ | 371,586,524 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (11.3)% | | $ | (37,721,173 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 333,865,351 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
BSCMS - Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
COMM - Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificate
CSFB - CS First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.
GECMC - General Electric Commercial Mortgage Corp.
GMACC - GMAC Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
JPMCC - JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
LB-UBS - LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust
MLMT - Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust
SBM7 - Salomon Brothers Mortgage Securities VII, Inc.
| | |
(1) | | Adjustable rate mortgage. |
|
(2) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover margin requirements on open financial futures contracts. |
|
(3) | | Weighted average fixed-rate coupon that changes/updates monthly. |
See notes to financial statements19
Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | |
(4) | | Variable rate security. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at October 31, 2009. |
|
(5) | | Interest only security that entitles the holder to receive only interest payments on the underlying mortgages. Principal amount shown is the notional amount of the underlying mortgages on which current interest is calculated. The interest rate shown represents the yield based on the estimated timing and amount of future cash flows at period-end. |
|
(6) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements20
Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $334,596,126) | | $ | 340,678,959 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $30,907,565) | | | 30,907,565 | | | |
Cash held at broker for open financial futures contracts | | | 448,000 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 1,221,401 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 502,010 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 373,757,935 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 39,238,414 | | | |
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 446,304 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 129,433 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 775 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 77,658 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 39,892,584 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 333,865,351 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 328,194,500 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 5,670,851 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 333,865,351 | | | |
|
|
Statement of Operations
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 7,168,385 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 78,416 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (64,352 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 7,182,449 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 880,899 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 8,314 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 110,952 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 34,559 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 11,034 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 1,045,758 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 4 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 4 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 1,045,754 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 6,136,695 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | 571,813 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (848,348 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (276,535 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 7,466,694 | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (472,543 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 6,994,151 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 6,717,616 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 12,854,311 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements21
Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 6,136,695 | | | $ | 3,505,453 | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions and financial futures contracts | | | (276,535 | ) | | | 225,585 | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and financial futures contracts | | | 6,994,151 | | | | (1,370,484 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 12,854,311 | | | $ | 2,360,554 | | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 292,367,758 | | | $ | 165,109,548 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (87,570,705 | ) | | | (93,579,773 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | 204,797,053 | | | $ | 71,529,775 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 217,651,364 | | | $ | 73,890,329 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 116,213,987 | | | $ | 42,323,658 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 333,865,351 | | | $ | 116,213,987 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements22
Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 0.58 | % | | | 0.63 | % | | | 0.65 | % | | | 0.66 | % | | | 0.65 | % | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction | | | 0.58 | % | | | 0.63 | % | | | 0.65 | % | | | 0.66 | % | | | 0.64 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.23 | % | | | 3.96 | % | | | 4.67 | % | | | 4.03 | % | | | 2.65 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 34 | % | | | 24 | % | | | 35 | % | | | 46 | % | | | 67 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 7.76 | % | | | 4.34 | % | | | 5.52 | % | | | 4.29 | % | | | 2.32 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 333,865 | | | $ | 116,214 | | | $ | 42,324 | | | $ | 38,835 | | | $ | 46,041 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements23
Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Investment Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to seek total return. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund and Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund held an interest of 92.5% and 6.6%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days and excluding most seasoned mortgage-backed securities) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Most seasoned, fixed rate 30-year mortgage-backed securities are valued through the use of the investment adviser’s matrix pricing system, which takes into account bond prices, yield differentials, anticipated prepayments and interest rates provided by dealers. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Financial futures contracts are valued at the settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities in the same manner as debt obligations described above.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement
24
Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
H Financial Futures Contracts — The Portfolio may enter into financial futures contracts. The Portfolio’s investment in financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against changes in interest rates or as a substitute for the purchase of securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the Portfolio is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Portfolio each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Portfolio. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Portfolio may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. In entering such contracts, the Portfolio bears the risk if the counterparties do not perform under the contracts’ terms. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.50% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $941,626 of which $60,727 was allocated from Cash Management and $880,899 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations and including maturities and paydowns, for the year ended October 31, 2009 were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Purchases | | | | | |
|
Investments (non-U.S. Government) | | $ | 62,964,989 | | | |
U.S. Government and Agency Securities | | | 209,931,415 | | | |
|
|
| | $ | 272,896,404 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Sales | | | | | | |
|
|
Investments (non-U.S. Government) | | $ | 16,475,878 | | | |
U.S. Government and Agency Securities | | | 47,087,733 | | | |
|
|
| | $ | 63,563,611 | | | |
|
|
25
Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 365,906,854 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 5,679,670 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | — | | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 5,679,670 | | | |
|
|
5 Financial Instruments
The Portfolio may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include financial futures contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Portfolio has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at October 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
Expiration
| | | | | | Aggregate
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Date | | Contracts | | Position | | Cost | | Value | | | Depreciation | | | |
|
12/09 | | 150 10 Year U.S. Treasury Note | | Short | | $(17,568,459) | | $ | (17,791,406 | ) | | $ | (222,947 | ) | | |
12/09 | | 260 30 Year U.S. Treasury Bond | | Short | | (31,051,590) | | | (31,240,625 | ) | | | (189,035 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (411,982 | ) | | |
|
|
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815-10), effective May 1, 2009. Such standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. The disclosure below includes additional information as a result of implementing FAS 161.
The Portfolio is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. Because the Portfolio holds fixed rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. The Portfolio may purchase and sell U.S. Treasury futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
The fair values of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk at October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value | | | |
| | |
Derivative | | Asset Derivative | | | Liability Derivative(1) | | | |
|
Futures | | $ | — | | | $ | (411,982 | ) | | |
| | |
(1) | | Amount represents cumulative unrealized depreciation on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk for the six months ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Change in
| | | |
| | | | | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | Realized Gain
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
| | | | | (Loss) on
| | | (Depreciation) on
| | | |
| | | | | Derivatives
| | | Derivatives
| | | |
| | | | | Recognized in
| | | Recognized in
| | | |
Derivative | | | | | Income(1) | | | Income(2) | | | |
|
Futures | | | | | | $ | 14,644 | | | $ | (376,996 | ) | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Financial futures contracts. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Financial futures contracts. |
The average notional amount of futures contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009, which is indicative of the volume of this derivative type, was approximately $14,929,000.
6 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term
26
Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
7 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| |
• | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
• | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
• | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Mortgage Pass-Throughs | | $ | — | | | $ | 223,171,720 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 223,171,720 | | | |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | | | — | | | | 25,664,403 | | | | — | | | | 25,664,403 | | | |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | | | — | | | | 29,641,932 | | | | — | | | | 29,641,932 | | | |
U.S. Government Agency Obligations | | | — | | | | 32,189,174 | | | | — | | | | 32,189,174 | | | |
U.S. Treasury Obligations | | | — | | | | 30,011,730 | | | | — | | | | 30,011,730 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 30,907,565 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 30,907,565 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 30,907,565 | | | $ | 340,678,959 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 371,586,524 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Liabilities Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Futures Contracts | | $ | (411,982 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (411,982 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | (411,982 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (411,982 | ) | | |
|
|
The Portfolio held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 28, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
27
Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Investment Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Investment Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits. The supplementary data for the year ended October 31, 2006, and all prior periods presented, were audited by other auditors. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on that supplementary data in their report dated December 27, 2006.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures include confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Investment Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 2009
28
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
29
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory and administration agreement of Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”), as well as the investment advisory agreements of Floating Rate Portfolio, Government Obligations Portfolio and Investment Portfolio (the “Portfolios”), the portfolios in which the Fund invests, each with Boston Management and Research (“BMR”), including their fee structures, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of each agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to each agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory and administration agreement and the investment advisory agreements for the Fund and the Portfolios, respectively. EVM and BMR are each referred to as an “Adviser” herein; EVM with respect to the Fund and BMR with respect to the Portfolios. EVM and BMR are affiliates.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory and administration agreement and the investment advisory agreements of the Fund and each Portfolio, respectively, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to each Portfolio by BMR and to the Fund by EVM. BMR manages the Portfolios, while EVM allocates the assets of the Fund among the Portfolios.
The Board considered BMR’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolios, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolios. In particular, the Board evaluated the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing special considerations relevant to investing in investment grade securities. With respect to the Floating Rate Portfolio, the Board noted the experience of BMR’s large group of bank loan investment professionals and other personnel who provide services to the Portfolios, including portfolio managers and analysts. With respect to the Government Obligations Portfolio, the Board noted the Adviser’s experience in investing in mortgage-backed securities, including seasoned mortgage-backed securities. For all the Portfolios, the Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund and each Portfolio by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
30
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory and administration agreement and investment advisory agreements.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board also considered the performance of the underlying Portfolios. The Board concluded that the Fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolios and the Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the one-year period ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered that EVM is waiving its investment advisory and administration fee in its entirety and has agreed to pay other expenses of the Fund, which will lower the Fund’s total expense ratios.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund, the Portfolios and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund and the Portfolios.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolios increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Portfolios and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolios, the structure of the advisory fees, which include breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
31
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust), Floating Rate Portfolio (FRP), Government Obligations Portfolio (GOP), Investment Portfolio (IP) and Multi-Sector Portfolio (MSP) (collectively, the Portfolios) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolios’ affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolios are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolios hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolios, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates, LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolios’ placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolios | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee of the Trust and FRP, GOP and IP since 2007 and of MSP since 2009 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolios. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust and FRP, GOP and IP since 2005 and of MSP since 2009 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust and FRP, GOP and IP since 2007 and of MSP since 2009 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust and FRP, GOP and IP since 2003 and of MSP since 2009 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust and FRP, GOP and IP since 2003 and of MSP since 2009 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust and FRP, GOP and IP since 2008 and of MSP since 2009 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
32
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolios | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust and FRP, GOP and IP since 2007 and of MSP since 2009 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust and GOP since 1998; of FRP since 2000; of IP since 2002 and of MSP since 2009 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee of the Trust and FRP, GOP and IP since 2005 and of MSP since 2009 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolios | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust, IP and GOP | | Vice President of the Trust since 2007, of GOP since 2006 and of IP since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
33
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolios | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Scott H. Page 11/30/59 | | President of FRP | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 11 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust and MSP | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Craig P. Russ 10/30/63 | | Vice President of FRP | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 6 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust, GOP and IP | | Vice President of the Trust and IP since 2002 and of GOP since 1993 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust and MSP | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Payson F. Swaffield 8/13/56 | | President of MSP | | Since 2009 | | Chief Income Investment Officer of EVC. Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 9 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of GOP and IP | | Vice President of the Trust since 2007 and President of GOP and IP since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005; of FRP, GOP and IP since 2008 and of MSP since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary of the Trust and FRP, GOP and IP since 2007 and of MSP since 2009 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Of the Trust and FRP, GOP and IP since 2004 and of MSP since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolios and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
34
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Investment Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Investment Adviser and Administrator of Eaton Vance Low Duration FundEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Low Duration FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolulte Return Fund |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolulte Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
Mark S. Venezia, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | The year ending October 31, 2009, closed with economic data showing a modest rebound in global economic fundamentals. For the markets, this rebound was a welcome change after witnessing a freefall in world economic output for the first two quarters of this period, followed by a slowdown in the pace of economic deterioration in the subsequent quarter. As signs of improving economic fundamentals began to emerge, investors’ aversion to risk reversed course and the capital markets staged a comeback. |
• | | In the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers collapse in late 2008, with credit markets at a virtual standstill and global economic activity in decline, prices on riskier assets remained depressed. The last three months of 2008 were marked by the outperformance of U.S. Government securities, relative to other asset classes, and a strong U.S. dollar, which were viewed as safe havens amidst the economic downturn. Credit markets, however, rallied sharply in the final two quarters of this twelve month period, and currencies in both developed and emerging markets rose against the dollar. |
• | | Amidst historic levels of central bank and government intervention, yield spreads across virtually all fixed income markets have tightened substantially, producing extraordinary returns in the riskier credit markets during the last six months of this 12 month period. A similar return story played out in the currency markets, as the higher yielding emerging market currencies, and currencies of commodity exporting countries, outperformed during the second half of the fiscal year. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
John R. Baur
Co-Portfolio Manager
Michael A. Cirami, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | The Fund1 seeks to provide total return through exposure to currencies and foreign and domestic interest rates and issuers. Such exposure may be achieved by investing in securities and other instruments as well as through derivative transactions. Foreign exposures include both developed and emerging markets. The Fund may borrow under the Term Asset-Backed Loan Facility (TALF) program (and any other similar non-recourse loan program). |
• | | The Fund outperformed its benchmark, the BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index (the Index), during the fiscal year. In addition to the positive contributions from individual credits and currencies in Europe, Latin America, and Asia, the Fund’s performance benefited significantly from its positions in U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS). |
• | | In Latin America, a region that contributed positively to the Fund’s returns, investments in Brazil and Uruguay were standouts. Brazil’s economy proved particularly resilient during the economic crisis. As a result, the currency rebounded significantly as evidence of that resilience emerged. Uruguay, an exporter to Brazil, not only benefited from Brazil’s |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08 – 10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A3 | | | 11.53 | % |
Class C3 | | | 0.89 | * |
Class I3 | | | 11.87 | |
BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index2 | | | 0.30 | |
Lipper Global Income Funds Average2 | | | 21.19 | |
| | |
* | | Performance is cumulative since share class inception on 10/1/09. |
See page 3 for more performance information.
| | |
1 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, Global Macro Portfolio (the Portfolio), with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
2 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect the commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for the Fund’s Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
1
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolulte Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
| | resilience but also its own growth momentum, as the Uruguyan economy avoided recession amidst global economic deterioration. |
• | | Investments in Eastern and Western Europe also contributed positively to the Fund’s performance. The Fund benefited from bond positions in Georgia, Macedonia, Kazakhstan, and Turkey, as well as long exposure to US dollar-denominated bonds in Iceland. In Iceland, bonds rebounded from the lows seen in 2008 during the collapse of the banking sector. Bonds in Turkey benefited from aggressive rate cuts by the central bank, bringing yields to historic lows. Offsetting those positives slightly was a long position in the Polish Zloty, which detracted from performance, primarily in the first half of the year, as it moved with general market sentiment. |
• | | Standouts in the Fund’s Asian exposures were Indonesia and South Korea. Due in part to a closed economy, Indonesia was sheltered from the economic downturn more than most of its Asian counterparts. Additionally Indonesia benefited as political stability was reinforced when President Yudhoyono was overwhelmingly reelected. South Korea, as an exporter with high susceptibility to external capital flows, was hurt by the global crisis but benefited significantly with the first signs of improvement. Offsetting those gains were losses on short positions in the Philippines, reflecting a stronger-than-expected Philippine economy. |
• | | While the Fund benefited from positions in Egyptian T-Bills and Zambian currency, the performance in the African region was overwhelmed by the negative performance of a short position in South African currency. Like many other relatively risky investments, the South African rand rallied substantially in the second half of the fiscal year. |
• | | The Fund’s MBS holdings remained focused on seasoned, fixed rate, U.S. government agency MBS (seasoned MBS). In the seasoned MBS market, yield spreads to U.S. Treasuries tightened by more than 140 basis points, contributing significantly to the Fund’s outperformance. Principal prepayment rates on these securities were relatively stable for the entire period, paying consistently at an annualized rate in the low teens. |
• | | The Fund’s duration declined during the year to 1.57 years at October 31, 2009 from 1.61 years at October 31, 2008. Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of a fund or a fixed-income security to changes in interest rates. A shorter duration instrument normally has less exposure to interest rate risk than longer duration instruments |
• | | Effective July 1, 2009, the Fund’s name was changed to Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund from Eaton Vance Global Macro Fund. |
Portfolio Composition
Securities Holdings (excludes derivative positions)1
By total net assets
| | |
1 | | Securities Holdings reflect the Portfolio’s securities positions as of 10/31/09. For International and Emerging Market currency exposures, please refer to the Currency Positions table below. |
Currency Positions2
By total net assets
| | | | |
Egypt | | | 5.3 | % |
Lebanon | | | 4.8 | |
India | | | 4.0 | |
Poland | | | 2.8 | |
Turkey | | | 2.8 | |
Indonesia | | | 1.8 | |
Norway | | | 1.8 | |
Mexico | | | 1.7 | |
South Korea | | | 1.5 | |
China | | | 1.3 | |
Zambia | | | 1.3 | |
Ukraine | | | 1.3 | |
Brazil | | | 1.0 | |
Serbia | | | 0.9 | |
Russia | | | 0.9 | |
Malaysia | | | 0.9 | |
Iceland | | | 0.8 | |
Australia | | | 0.8 | |
Ghana | | | 0.7 | |
Uruguay | | | 0.6 | |
Colombia | | | 0.5 | |
Sweden | | | 0.4 | |
United Arab Emirates | | | 0.4 | |
Chile | | | 0.3 | |
Costa Rica | | | 0.1 | |
Hong Kong | | | 0.1 | |
Sri Lanka | | | -0.1 | |
Japan | | | -0.4 | |
Kazakhstan | | | -1.1 | |
South Africa | | | -2.1 | |
Euro | | | -7.4 | |
| | |
2 | | Currency Positions reflect the Portfolio’s investments as of 10/31/09. Currency exposures include all foreign exchange denominated assets and all currency derivatives. As of 10/31/09, Foreign Long Derivatives were 29.2%; Other Foreign Short Derivatives were 29.5%. All numbers are a percentage of net assets. Total exposures may exceed 100% due to implicit leverage created by derivatives. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
2
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolulte Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graphs and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graphs compare the performance of Class A, Class C and Class I of the Fund with that of the BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index, an unmanaged market index of U.S. Treasury securities maturing in 90 days that assumes reinvestment of all income. The lines on the graphs represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A, Class C and Class I of the Fund and the BofA Merrill Lynch 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fund Performance1 | | Class A | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbols | | EAGMX | | ECGMX | | EIGMX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 11.53 | % | | | N.A. | | | | 11.87 | % |
Life of Fund † | | | 7.86 | | | | 0.89 | %†† | | | 8.10 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | |
One Year | | | 6.24 | % | | | N.A. | | | | 11.87 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | 5.64 | | | | -0.11 | %†† | | | 8.10 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates – Class A: 6/27/07; Class C: 10/1/09; Class I: 6/27/07. |
|
†† | | Returns are cumulative since inception of the share class. |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 4.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 4.75% sales charge. SEC Returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. Absent an allocation of expenses to the administrator, the returns would be lower. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Gross Expense Ratio | | | 1.43 | % | | | 2.13 | % | | | 1.13 | % |
Net Expense Ratio | | | 1.20 | | | | 1.90 | | | | 0.90 | |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/01/09, as supplemented. The Net Expense Ratio reflects a contractual expense limitation that continues through February 28, 2010. Thereafter, the expense limitation may be changed or terminated at any time. Without this expense limitation, the returns would be lower. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/696ee/696eec0382e9d8f148dfacc0ebd2f1fdec8aaf6e" alt="(LINE GRAPH)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5b73/d5b73d9502a29a6d3d3eb2a1253cf9240761adc7" alt="(LINE GRAPH)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36ecf/36ecf84e20500e678000396cb24d44429b8ad03e" alt="(LINE GRAPH)"
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A and Class I of the Fund commenced operations on 6/27/07. Class C of the Fund commenced operations on 10/1/09. |
|
| | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index data is available as of month end only. |
3
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,073.20 | | | | $6.74 | *** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,008.90 | | | | $1.68 | *** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,074.80 | | | | $5.18 | *** | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.70 | | | | $6.56 | *** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.30 | | | | $10.01 | *** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.20 | | | | $5.04 | *** | | |
| | | |
| * | Class C had not commenced operations as of May 1, 2009. Actual expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.29% for Class A shares, 1.97% for Class C shares, and 0.99% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period); 31/365 for Class C (to reflect the period from commencement of operations on October 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009 (September 30, 2009 for Class C). | |
|
| ** | Hypothetical expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.29% for Class A shares, 1.97% for Class C shares, and 0.99% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
|
| *** | Absent an allocation of expense to the administrator, expenses would be higher. | |
4
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Global Macro Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $362,993,347) | | $ | 369,362,120 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 31,878,333 | | | |
Receivable from affiliate | | | 75,209 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 401,315,662 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 4,504,660 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 362,166 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 58,555 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 67,577 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 4,993,000 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 396,322,662 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 392,301,245 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (4,953,269 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 2,605,913 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolio | | | 6,368,773 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 396,322,662 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 209,714,056 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 20,247,834 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 10.36 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 95.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 10.88 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 39,020,102 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 3,768,877 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 10.35 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 147,588,504 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 14,270,553 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 10.34 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $25,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest allocated from Portfolio (net of foreign taxes, $34,227) | | $ | 6,214,596 | | | |
Dividends allocated from Portfolio | | | 22,110 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (791,560 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 5,445,146 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 201,239 | | | |
Class C | | | 10,310 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 287 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 34,432 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 103,704 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 37,653 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 72,693 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 94,746 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 9,197 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 564,261 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Expense reduction by affiliate | | $ | 128,733 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 128,733 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 435,528 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 5,009,618 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (174,037 | ) | | |
Securities sold short | | | (4,847 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (49,658 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (91,757 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (544,667 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (864,966 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 10,220,968 | | | |
Securities sold short | | | (146,125 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (114,868 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (824,615 | ) | | |
Written options | | | 54,669 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (762,504 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 8,427,525 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 7,562,559 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 12,572,177 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 5,009,618 | | | $ | 955,955 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (864,966 | ) | | | (111,668 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, securities sold short, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, written options, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 8,427,525 | | | | (2,059,035 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 12,572,177 | | | $ | (1,214,748 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (3,735,376 | ) | | $ | (803,464 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (33,894 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class I | | | (2,283,497 | ) | | | (224,233 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (34,920 | ) | | | (142,661 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (17,362 | ) | | | (60,966 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (6,105,049 | ) | | $ | (1,231,324 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 227,569,607 | | | $ | 42,583,546 | | | |
Class C | | | 39,059,030 | | | | — | | | |
Class I | | | 135,261,458 | | | | 17,174,634 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 3,060,089 | | | | 879,628 | | | |
Class C | | | 24,318 | | | | — | | | |
Class I | | | 1,771,888 | | | | 218,239 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (63,209,609 | ) | | | (3,496,420 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (34,799 | ) | | | — | | | |
Class I | | | (8,114,565 | ) | | | (481,015 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 335,387,417 | | | $ | 56,878,612 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 341,854,545 | | | $ | 54,432,540 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 54,468,117 | | | $ | 35,577 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 396,322,662 | | | $ | 54,468,117 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 2,605,913 | | | $ | (435,115 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | October 31, 2007(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.830 | | | $ | 10.220 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.460 | | | $ | 0.499 | | | $ | 0.123 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.649 | | | | (0.247 | ) | | | 0.201 | | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 1.109 | | | $ | 0.252 | | | $ | 0.324 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.571 | ) | | $ | (0.605 | ) | | $ | (0.225 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | (0.008 | ) | | | (0.037 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.579 | ) | | $ | (0.642 | ) | | $ | (0.225 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital contribution from administrator(2) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.121 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 10.360 | | | $ | 9.830 | | | $ | 10.220 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 11.53 | % | | | 2.49 | % | | | 4.50 | %(4)(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 209,714 | | | $ | 38,178 | | | $ | 25 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees(6)(7)(8) | | | 1.18 | % | | | 1.10 | % | | | 1.05 | %(9) | | |
Interest expense(10) | | | 0.06 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Total expenses(6)(7)(8) | | | 1.24 | % | | | 1.10 | % | | | 1.05 | %((9) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.56 | % | | | 4.90 | % | | | 3.55 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 25 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 45 | %((9) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Absent a capital contribution by the administrator for the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, total return would have been 3.99%. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.12%, 0.33% and 673.39% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009 and 2008, and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, respectively). |
|
(9) | | Annualized. |
|
(10) | | Interest expense relates to interest on securities sold short. |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | |
| | Class C | | | |
| | |
| | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 10.300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(2) | | $ | (0.012 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | | 0.104 | | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 0.092 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.042 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.042 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 10.350 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 0.89 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 39,020 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees(5)(6)(7) | | | 1.90 | %(8) | | |
Interest expense(9) | | | 0.07 | %(8) | | |
Total expenses(5)(6)(7) | | | 1.97 | %(8) | | |
Net investment loss | | | (1.41 | )%(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 25 | %(10) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from commencement of operations on October 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.08% of average daily net assets for the period ended October 31, 2009). |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
|
(9) | | Interest expense relates to interest on securities sold short. |
|
(10) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | October 31, 2007(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 9.820 | | | $ | 10.210 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.504 | | | $ | 0.464 | | | $ | 0.146 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.623 | | | | (0.181 | ) | | | 0.243 | | | |
|
|
Total income from operations | | $ | 1.127 | | | $ | 0.283 | | | $ | 0.389 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.599 | ) | | $ | (0.636 | ) | | $ | (0.235 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | (0.008 | ) | | | (0.037 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.607 | ) | | $ | (0.673 | ) | | $ | (0.235 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Capital contribution from administrator(2) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 0.056 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 10.340 | | | $ | 9.820 | | | $ | 10.210 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 11.87 | % | | | 2.69 | % | | | 4.50 | %(4)(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 147,589 | | | $ | 16,291 | | | $ | 10 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees(6)(7)(8) | | | 0.88 | % | | | 0.80 | % | | | 0.75 | %(9) | | |
Interest expense(10) | | | 0.06 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Total expenses(6)(7)(8) | | | 0.94 | % | | | 0.80 | % | | | 0.75 | %(9) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.01 | % | | | 4.59 | % | | | 4.15 | %(9) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 25 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 45 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Absent a capital contribution by the administrator for the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, total return would have been 3.99%. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.12%, 0.33% and 673.39% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009 and 2008, and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, respectively). |
|
(9) | | Annualized. |
|
(10) | | Interest expense relates to interest on securities sold short. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Global Macro Fund) (the Fund) is a non-diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers three classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Global Macro Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (28.0% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $4,585,883 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2017.
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed since the start of business on June 27, 2007 to October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
10
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund declares dividends daily to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are generally paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any) are made at least annually. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 6,052,767 | | | $ | 1,027,697 | | | |
Long-term capital gains | | $ | 52,282 | | | $ | 203,627 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was increased by $4,084,177 and accumulated undistributed net investment income was increased by $4,084,177 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss), swap contracts, premium amortization and paydown gain (loss). These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 3,538,027 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (4,585,883 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 5,431,439 | | | |
Other temporary differences | | $ | (362,166 | ) | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to foreign currency gain (loss), forward currency transactions, futures contracts, swap contracts, premium amortization, partnership allocations and timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.615% of the Fund’s average daily net assets that are not invested in other investment companies for which EVM or its affiliates serve as investment adviser or administrator (“Investable Assets”) up to $500 million and is payable monthly. On net assets of $500 million and over that are invested in Investable Assets, the annual fee is reduced. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund incurred no adviser fee on Investable Assets. To the extent the Fund’s assets are invested in the Portfolio, the Fund is allocated its share of the Portfolio’s adviser fee. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report. EVM also serves as the administrator to the Fund, but receives no compensation. Effective March 1, 2009, EVM has agreed to reimburse the Fund’s operating expenses to the extent that they exceed 1.20%, 1.90% and 0.90% annually of the Fund’s average daily net assets for Class A, Class C and Class I, respectively. This agreement may be changed or terminated after February 28, 2010. Prior to March 1, 2009, EVM had agreed to reduce the Fund’s operating expenses to the extent that they exceeded 1.10% and 0.80% annually of the Fund’s average daily net assets for Class A and Class I, respectively. Pursuant to this agreement, EVM was allocated $128,733 of the Fund’s operating expenses for the year ended October 31, 2009.
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $6,975 in sub-transfer
11
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $105,264 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.30% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $201,239 for Class A shares. The Class C Plan requires the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $7,733 for Class C shares, representing 0.75% (annualized) of the average daily net assets of Class C shares.
The Class C Plan also authorizes the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $2,577 for Class C shares.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) of 1% generally is imposed on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class C Plan. CDSCs received on Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $174 of CDSCs paid by Class A shareholders.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $325,489,811 and $23,426,279, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 22,212,530 | | | | 4,139,596 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 303,499 | | | | 86,745 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (6,151,561 | ) | | | (345,456 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 16,364,468 | | | | 3,880,885 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Period Ended
| | | | | | |
Class C | | October 31, 2009(1) | | | | | | |
|
Sales | | | 3,769,885 | | | | | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 2,350 | | | | | | | |
Redemptions | | | (3,358 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 3,768,877 | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class I | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 13,236,066 | | | | 1,684,471 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 175,694 | | | | 21,726 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (800,740 | ) | | | (47,664 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 12,611,020 | | | | 1,658,533 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from commencement of operations on October 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009. |
12
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
8 Name Change
Effective July 1, 2009, the name of Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund was changed from Eaton Vance Global Macro Fund.
9 Reviews for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 23, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
13
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust
and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Global Macro
Absolute Return Fund (formerly Eaton Vance
Global Macro Fund):
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund (the “Fund”) (formerly Eaton Vance Global Macro Fund) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the two years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, June 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 23, 2009
14
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of qualified dividend income and capital gains dividends.
Qualified Dividend Income. The Fund designates $21,510 or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
Capital Gains Dividends. The Fund designates $52,282 as a capital gain dividend.
15
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Government Bonds — 9.0% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Brazil — 0.5% |
|
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional, 6.00%, 5/15/15(1) | | BRL | | | 11,977,204 | | | $ | 6,588,517 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Brazil (identified cost $5,616,391) | | $ | 6,588,517 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Congo — 0.1% |
|
Republic of Congo, 3.00%, 6/30/29 | | USD | | | 2,128,000 | | | $ | 1,058,680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Congo (identified cost $834,856) | | $ | 1,058,680 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Costa Rica — 0.1% |
|
Titulo Propiedad Ud, 1.00%, 1/12/22(2) | | CRC | | | 2,247,311,409 | | | $ | 1,707,142 | | | |
Titulo Propiedad Ud, 1.63%, 7/13/16(3) | | CRC | | | 263,302,959 | | | | 203,278 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Costa Rica (identified cost $2,609,008) | | $ | 1,910,420 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Georgia — 0.4% |
|
Republic of Georgia, 7.50%, 4/15/13 | | USD | | | 4,764,000 | | | $ | 4,835,460 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Georgia (identified cost $3,397,333) | | $ | 4,835,460 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ghana — 0.4% |
|
Ghana Government Bond, 13.00%, 8/2/10 | | GHS | | | 600,000 | | | $ | 387,643 | | | |
Ghana Government Bond, 13.50%, 3/30/10 | | GHS | | | 980,000 | | | | 652,556 | | | |
Ghana Government Bond, 13.67%, 6/11/12(4) | | GHS | | | 4,300,000 | | | | 2,353,740 | | | |
Ghana Government Bond, 13.69%, 3/15/10 | | GHS | | | 1,900,000 | | | | 1,271,076 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Ghana (identified cost $8,305,683) | | $ | 4,665,015 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ivory Coast — 0.1% |
|
Ivory Coast, 4.00%, 3/31/28(5) | | USD | | | 2,296,000 | | | $ | 1,376,452 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Ivory Coast (identified cost $848,657) | | $ | 1,376,452 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Macedonia — 0.6% |
|
Republic of Macedonia, 4.625%, 12/8/15 | | EUR | | | 6,594,000 | | | $ | 8,485,817 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Macedonia (identified cost $5,650,859) | | $ | 8,485,817 | | | |
|
|
|
Poland — 0.8% |
|
Poland Government Bond, 3.00%, 8/24/16(6) | | PLN | | | 29,900,774 | | | $ | 9,881,312 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Poland (identified cost $8,505,430) | | $ | 9,881,312 | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Africa — 0.9% |
|
Republic of South Africa, 6.50%, 6/2/14 | | USD | | | 11,090,000 | | | $ | 12,143,550 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total South Africa (identified cost $12,230,320) | | $ | 12,143,550 | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Korea — 0.3% |
|
Republic of South Korea, 7.125%, 4/16/19 | | USD | | | 3,770,000 | | | $ | 4,422,644 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total South Korea | | | | | | |
(identified cost $3,735,630) | | | | | | $ | 4,422,644 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Turkey — 4.2% |
|
Turkey Government Bond, 9.00%, 5/21/14(7) | | TRY | | | 12,614,863 | | | $ | 10,006,296 | | | |
Turkey Government Bond, 10.00%, 2/15/12(8) | | TRY | | | 20,336,004 | | | | 15,205,500 | | | |
Turkey Government Bond, 12.00%, 8/14/13(9) | | TRY | | | 35,255,303 | | | | 29,644,240 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Turkey (identified cost $42,554,990) | | $ | 54,856,036 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Uruguay — 0.6% |
|
Republic of Uruguay, 5.00%, 9/14/18(10) | | UYU | | | 170,663,510 | | | $ | 8,454,698 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Uruguay (identified cost $7,395,946) | | $ | 8,454,698 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Foreign Government Bonds (identified cost $101,685,103) | | $ | 118,678,601 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Corporate Bonds & Notes — 0.8% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Chile — 0.3% |
|
JPMorgan Chilean Inflation Linked Note, 3.80%, 11/17/15(11) | | USD | | | 3,504,414 | | | $ | 3,703,729 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Chile (identified cost $3,000,000) | | $ | 3,703,729 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements16
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Indonesia — 0.0% |
|
APP Finance VI, 0.00%, 11/18/12(5) | | USD | | | 4,000,000 | | | $ | 20,000 | | | |
APP Finance VII, 3.50%, 4/30/24(5) | | USD | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 10,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Indonesia (identified cost $3,094,175) | | $ | 30,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Kazakhstan — 0.5% |
|
Kazkommerts International, 7.875%, 4/7/14(12) | | USD | | | 7,500,000 | | | $ | 6,318,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Kazakhstan (identified cost $6,232,621) | | $ | 6,318,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Foreign Corporate Bonds & Notes (identified cost $12,326,796) | | $ | 10,052,479 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Debt Obligations - United States — 63.4% |
|
Corporate Bonds & Notes — 0.1% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Eaton Corp., 8.875%, 6/15/19 | | | | $ | 500,000 | | | $ | 632,595 | | | |
Ingersoll-Rand Co., 6.48%, 6/1/25 | | | | | 1,050,000 | | | | 1,013,598 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes | | | | | | |
(identified cost $1,528,795) | | | | | | $ | 1,646,193 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations — 7.9% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: |
Series 4, Class D, 8.00%, 12/25/22 | | | | $ | 435,869 | | | $ | 437,280 | | | |
Series 1548, Class Z, 7.00%, 7/15/23 | | | | | 567,395 | | | | 599,911 | | | |
Series 1650, Class K, 6.50%, 1/15/24 | | | | | 3,614,091 | | | | 3,936,055 | | | |
Series 1817, Class Z, 6.50%, 2/15/26 | | | | | 484,435 | | | | 517,348 | | | |
Series 1927, Class ZA, 6.50%, 1/15/27 | | | | | 1,938,642 | | | | 2,045,051 | | | |
Series 2127, Class PG, 6.25%, 2/15/29 | | | | | 2,319,417 | | | | 2,475,780 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 10,011,425 | | | |
|
|
|
Federal National Mortgage Association: |
Series 1992-180, Class F, 1.431%, 10/25/22(13) | | | | $ | 1,871,615 | | | $ | 1,908,715 | | | |
Series 1993-16, Class Z, 7.50%, 2/25/23 | | | | | 1,843,740 | | | | 2,070,856 | | | |
Series 1993-79, Class PL, 7.00%, 6/25/23 | | | | | 1,397,314 | | | | 1,557,950 | | | |
Series 1993-104, Class ZB, 6.50%, 7/25/23 | | | | | 582,001 | | | | 637,777 | | | |
Series 1993-121, Class Z, 7.00%, 7/25/23 | | | | | 8,965,939 | | | | 9,997,009 | | | |
Series 1993-141, Class Z, 7.00%, 8/25/23 | | | | | 1,440,365 | | | | 1,611,468 | | | |
Series 1994-42, Class ZQ, 7.00%, 4/25/24 | | | | | 8,880,903 | | | | 9,912,224 | | | |
Series 1994-79, Class Z, 7.00%, 4/25/24 | | | | | 1,719,833 | | | | 1,919,176 | | | |
Series 1994-89, Class ZQ, 8.00%, 7/25/24 | | | | | 1,215,290 | | | | 1,399,790 | | | |
Series 1996-35, Class Z, 7.00%, 7/25/26 | | | | | 448,426 | | | | 503,799 | | | |
Series 1998-16, Class H, 7.00%, 4/18/28 | | | | | 1,230,944 | | | | 1,382,257 | | | |
Series 1999-25, Class Z, 6.00%, 6/25/29 | | | | | 3,853,032 | | | | 4,157,582 | | | |
Series 2000-2, Class ZE, 7.50%, 2/25/30 | | | | | 513,054 | | | | 579,516 | | | |
Series 2000-49, Class A, 8.00%, 3/18/27 | | | | | 1,458,246 | | | | 1,676,762 | | | |
Series 2001-37, Class GA, 8.00%, 7/25/16 | | | | | 177,538 | | | | 194,722 | | | |
Series 2009-48, Class WA, 5.844%, 7/25/39(14) | | | | | 18,407,444 | | | | 19,728,297 | | | |
Series G48, Class Z, 7.10%, 12/25/21 | | | | | 1,428,089 | | | | 1,579,628 | | | |
Series G93-1, Class K, 6.675%, 1/25/23 | | | | | 2,080,103 | | | | 2,287,495 | | | |
Series G93-31, Class PN, 7.00%, 9/25/23 | | | | | 6,553,115 | | | | 7,225,636 | | | |
Series G93-41, Class ZQ, 7.00%, 12/25/23 | | | | | 13,269,148 | | | | 14,632,287 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 84,962,946 | | | |
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association: |
Series 1996-22, Class Z, 7.00%, 10/16/26 | | | | $ | 1,170,727 | | | $ | 1,299,690 | | | |
Series 1999-42, Class Z, 8.00%, 11/16/29 | | | | | 3,025,003 | | | | 3,437,349 | | | |
Series 2001-35, Class K, 6.45%, 10/26/23 | | | | | 485,215 | | | | 530,416 | | | |
Series 2002-48, Class OC, 6.00%, 9/16/30 | | | | | 4,247,741 | | | | 4,383,653 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 9,651,108 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (identified cost $100,068,473) | | $ | 104,625,479 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage Pass-Throughs — 52.1% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3.003%, with maturity at 2035(15) | | | | $ | 9,023,361 | | | $ | 9,319,287 | | | |
3.568%, with maturity at 2029(15) | | | | | 1,948,684 | | | | 1,990,096 | | | |
4.34%, with maturity at 2030(15) | | | | | 2,606,128 | | | | 2,712,001 | | | |
4.559%, with maturity at 2023(15) | | | | | 773,682 | | | | 798,961 | | | |
5.00%, with various maturities to 2019 | | | | | 10,640,232 | | | | 11,368,683 | | | |
5.50%, with various maturities to 2013 | | | | | 9,986,332 | | | | 10,645,542 | | | |
6.00%, with various maturities to 2035(16) | | | | | 72,776,014 | | | | 78,143,602 | | | |
6.50%, with various maturities to 2024 | | | | | 7,186,068 | | | | 7,831,376 | | | |
7.00%, with various maturities to 2035 | | | | | 14,881,013 | | | | 16,524,858 | | | |
7.31%, with maturity at 2026 | | | | | 428,090 | | | | 483,708 | | | |
7.50%, with various maturities to 2035 | | | | | 39,843,175 | | | | 44,923,278 | | | |
7.95%, with maturity at 2022 | | | | | 612,944 | | | | 699,998 | | | |
8.00%, with various maturities to 2030 | | | | | 3,132,258 | | | | 3,579,880 | | | |
8.15%, with maturity at 2021 | | | | | 345,268 | | | | 398,784 | | | |
8.30%, with maturity at 2021 | | | | | 233,943 | | | | 267,347 | | | |
8.47%, with maturity at 2018 | | | | | 275,495 | | | | 305,605 | | | |
8.50%, with various maturities to 2028 | | | | | 1,828,016 | | | | 2,122,801 | | | |
See notes to financial statements17
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: (continued) |
9.00%, with various maturities to 2027 | | | | $ | 3,518,301 | | | $ | 4,092,280 | | | |
9.50%, with various maturities to 2027 | | | | | 366,350 | | | | 436,678 | | | |
9.75%, with various maturities to 2020 | | | | | 8,135 | | | | 9,372 | | | |
10.00%, with various maturities to 2020 | | | | | 1,226,410 | | | | 1,408,409 | | | |
10.50%, with maturity at 2021 | | | | | 596,461 | | | | 694,294 | | | |
11.00%, with maturity at 2016 | | | | | 867,194 | | | | 989,003 | | | |
13.25%, with maturity at 2013 | | | | | 934 | | | | 999 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 199,746,842 | | | |
|
|
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2.688%, with maturity at 2022(15) | | | | $ | 3,525,507 | | | $ | 3,604,656 | | | |
2.723%, with various maturities to 2035(15) | | | | | 34,256,505 | | | | 35,143,990 | | | |
2.787%, with maturity at 2035(15) | | | | | 7,725,635 | | | | 7,926,668 | | | |
2.849%, with various maturities to 2033(15) | | | | | 26,750,460 | | | | 27,431,137 | | | |
2.873%, with maturity at 2025(15) | | | | | 2,116,494 | | | | 2,175,840 | | | |
3.073%, with maturity at 2024(15) | | | | | 1,690,082 | | | | 1,744,159 | | | |
3.691%, with maturity at 2034(15) | | | | | 5,432,490 | | | | 5,653,182 | | | |
3.828%, with maturity at 2035(15) | | | | | 19,768,945 | | | | 20,572,049 | | | |
3.983%, with maturity at 2028(15) | | | | | 336,153 | | | | 345,165 | | | |
4.337%, with maturity at 2023(15) | | | | | 186,205 | | | | 192,057 | | | |
4.419%, with maturity at 2035(15) | | | | | 14,852,761 | | | | 15,456,147 | | | |
5.00%, with various maturities to 2018(16) | | | | | 28,018,984 | | | | 29,893,821 | | | |
5.50%, with various maturities to 2018 | | | | | 4,423,188 | | | | 4,747,883 | | | |
6.00%, with various maturities to 2032 | | | | | 9,065,234 | | | | 9,661,728 | | | |
6.319%, with maturity at 2032(15) | | | | | 6,333,113 | | | | 6,590,393 | | | |
6.50%, with various maturities to 2030 | | | | | 33,018,537 | | | | 35,863,176 | | | |
6.862%, with maturity at 2025(15) | | | | | 715,405 | | | | 758,105 | | | |
7.00%, with various maturities to 2033(16) | | | | | 70,688,558 | | | | 78,064,823 | | | |
7.50%, with various maturities to 2034 | | | | | 30,032,074 | | | | 33,587,784 | | | |
8.00%, with various maturities to 2030 | | | | | 10,821,471 | | | | 12,314,769 | | | |
8.50%, with various maturities to 2032 | | | | | 16,738,450 | | | | 19,576,123 | | | |
9.00%, with various maturities to 2032 | | | | | 3,211,053 | | | | 3,743,944 | | | |
9.00%, with maturity at 2010(14) | | | | | 6,027 | | | | 6,100 | | | |
9.046%, with maturity at 2028(14) | | | | | 1,002,201 | | | | 1,158,250 | | | |
9.50%, with various maturities to 2031 | | | | | 5,189,705 | | | | 6,115,362 | | | |
10.50%, with maturity at 2029 | | | | | 537,140 | | | | 643,427 | | | |
11.00%, with maturity at 2016 | | | | | 61,277 | | | | 67,706 | | | |
11.029%, with maturity at 2027(14) | | | | | 1,040,912 | | | | 1,203,178 | | | |
11.50%, with maturity at 2031 | | | | | 775,067 | | | | 963,098 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 365,204,720 | | | |
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4.125%, with maturity at 2024(15) | | | | $ | 831,806 | | | $ | 859,319 | | | |
6.50%, with various maturities to 2024 | | | | | 2,874,633 | | | | 3,131,380 | | | |
7.00%, with various maturities to 2035 | | | | | 57,443,261 | | | | 64,033,269 | | | |
7.50%, with various maturities to 2031 | | | | | 11,239,422 | | | | 12,729,073 | | | |
7.75%, with maturity at 2019 | | | | | 40,594 | | | | 46,125 | | | |
8.00%, with various maturities to 2034 | | | | | 30,910,826 | | | | 35,278,295 | | | |
8.30%, with various maturities to 2020 | | | | | 210,058 | | | | 236,872 | | | |
8.50%, with various maturities to 2021 | | | | | 2,052,937 | | | | 2,323,237 | | | |
9.00%, with various maturities to 2025 | | | | | 673,550 | | | | 783,276 | | | |
9.50%, with various maturities to 2026 | | | | | 2,222,737 | | | | 2,683,802 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 122,104,648 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Mortgage Pass-Throughs | | | | | | |
(identified cost $662,999,191) | | | | | | $ | 687,056,210 | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities — 2.7% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
CD, Series 2007-CD4, Class A4, 5.322%, 12/11/49 | | | | $ | 3,330,000 | | | $ | 2,997,255 | | | |
COMM, Series 2007-C9, Class A4, 5.816%, 12/10/49(14) | | | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 4,640,701 | | | |
GCCFC, Series 2007-GG9, Class A4, 5.444%, 3/10/39 | | | | | 5,000,000 | | | | 4,473,509 | | | |
JPMCC, Series 2005-LDP5, Class AM, 5.221%, 12/15/44(14) | | | | | 9,960,000 | | | | 8,654,565 | | | |
JPMCC, Series 2007-LDPX, Class A3, 5.42%, 1/15/49 | | | | | 1,600,000 | | | | 1,405,416 | | | |
MLMT, Series 2006-C2, Class A2, 5.756%, 8/12/43(14) | | | | | 7,000,000 | | | | 7,068,958 | | | |
WBCMT, Series 2005-C17, Class A4, 5.083%, 3/15/42(14) | | | | | 6,000,000 | | | | 6,018,702 | | | |
|
|
|
Total Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities |
(identified cost $32,842,394) | | | | | | $ | 35,259,106 | | | |
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government Agency Bonds — 0.4% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States Agency for International Development-Israel, 5.50%, 12/4/23 | | | | $ | 5,000,000 | | | $ | 5,563,135 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total U.S. Government Agency Bonds | | | | | | |
(identified cost $5,498,810) | | | | | | $ | 5,563,135 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury Obligations — 0.2% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
United States Treasury Bond, 7.875%, 2/15/21(16) | | | | $ | 1,500,000 | | | $ | 2,081,485 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total U.S. Treasury Obligations | | | | | | |
(identified cost $1,767,200) | | | | | | $ | 2,081,485 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Debt Obligations - United States | | | | | | |
(identified cost $804,704,863) | | | | | | $ | 836,231,608 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements18
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 0.3% |
|
Security | | | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
China — 0.1% |
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 0.1% |
|
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China, Ltd. | | | | | 2,191,752 | | | $ | 1,743,791 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 1,743,791 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services — 0.0% |
|
APP China | | | | | 8,155 | | | $ | 326,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 326,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total China (identified cost $2,395,650) | | $ | 2,069,991 | | | |
|
|
|
|
United Arab Emirates — 0.2% |
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 0.1% |
|
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank | | | | | 423,280 | | | $ | 224,516 | | | |
First Gulf Bank | | | | | 110,000 | | | | 561,077 | | | |
National Bank of Abu Dhabi | | | | | 39,600 | | | | 143,642 | | | |
Union National Bank | | | | | 330,000 | | | | 339,169 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 1,268,404 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services — 0.0% |
|
Waha Capital (PJSC) | | | | | 997,500 | | | $ | 247,415 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 247,415 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 0.0% |
|
Abu Dhabi National Hotels | | | | | 58,330 | | | $ | 70,670 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 70,670 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Management & Development — 0.1% |
|
Aldar Properties (PJSC) | | | | | 240,000 | | | $ | 379,345 | | | |
Sorouh Real Estate Co. | | | | | 340,000 | | | | 328,892 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | $ | 708,237 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total United Arab Emirates | | | | | | |
(identified cost $1,724,739) | | | | | | $ | 2,294,726 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Common Stocks | | | | | | |
(identified cost $4,120,389) | | | | | | $ | 4,364,717 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Companies — 0.0% |
|
Description | | | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
First Trust/Four Corners Senior Floating Rate Income Fund II | | | | | 15,000 | | | $ | 163,500 | | | |
ING Prime Rate Trust | | | | | 30,000 | | | | 150,600 | | | |
Nuveen Senior Income Fund | | | | | 29,830 | | | | 175,102 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Investment Companies | | | | | | |
(identified cost $371,759) | | | | | | $ | 489,202 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency Options Purchased — 0.1% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amount of
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Contracts
| | | Strike
| | | Expiration
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Price | | | Date | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Euro Put Option | | EUR | 18,447 | | | EUR | 1.41 | | | | 4/29/10 | | | $ | 545,578 | | | |
Japanese Yen Put Option | | JPY | 2,857,000 | | | JPY | 106.91 | | | | 4/8/10 | | | | 20,948 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Currency Options Purchased (identified cost $987,347) | | $ | 566,526 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 32.1%
|
Foreign Government Securities — 16.7% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | | | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Iceland — 0.8% |
|
Iceland Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/16/09 | | ISK | | | 699,536 | | | $ | 4,715,291 | | | |
Iceland Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/15/10 | | ISK | | | 180,870 | | | | 1,193,141 | | | |
Iceland Treasury Note, 7.00%, 3/17/10 | | ISK | | | 743,684 | | | | 5,006,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Iceland (identified cost $10,546,470) | | $ | 10,914,557 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lebanon — 4.8% |
|
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/5/09 | | LBP | | | 3,685,000 | | | $ | 2,451,769 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/19/09 | | LBP | | | 4,574,000 | | | | 3,037,663 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/17/09 | | LBP | | | 2,088,940 | | | | 1,383,318 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/17/09 | | LBP | | | 2,212,500 | | | | 1,465,140 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/24/09 | | LBP | | | 3,344,330 | | | | 2,212,602 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/31/09 | | LBP | | | 3,304,230 | | | | 2,183,982 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/7/10 | | LBP | | | 3,342,000 | | | | 2,206,743 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/21/10 | | LBP | | | 2,223,000 | | | | 1,464,782 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/4/10 | | LBP | | | 4,480,000 | | | | 2,945,376 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/18/10 | | LBP | | | 3,379,000 | | | | 2,216,237 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 3/4/10 | | LBP | | | 2,878,000 | | | | 1,882,886 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 3/18/10 | | LBP | | | 15,127,980 | | | | 9,870,957 | | | |
See notes to financial statements19
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | | | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Lebanon (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/1/10 | | LBP | | | 7,675,000 | | | $ | 4,993,911 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/15/10 | | LBP | | | 10,544,000 | | | | 6,840,613 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/29/10 | | LBP | | | 18,810,000 | | | | 12,193,939 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 9/23/10 | | LBP | | | 2,682,000 | | | | 1,692,696 | | | |
Lebanon Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 10/21/10 | | LBP | | | 6,760,200 | | | | 4,246,504 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Lebanon | | | | | | |
(identified cost $62,835,296) | | | | | | $ | 63,289,118 | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Korea — 1.1% |
|
Korea Monetary Stabilization Bond, 5.45%, 1/23/10 | | KRW | | | 3,507,930 | | | $ | 2,988,528 | | | |
Korea Monetary Stabilization Bond, 5.54%, 11/14/09 | | KRW | | | 7,811,040 | | | | 6,614,261 | | | |
Korea Treasury Bond, 4.75%, 12/10/09 | | KRW | | | 5,378,950 | | | | 4,561,859 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total South Korea | | | | | | |
(identified cost $13,685,824) | | | | | | $ | 14,164,648 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Sri Lanka — 3.8% |
|
Sri Lanka Government Bond, 7.60%, 4/1/10 | | LKR | | | 189,310 | | | $ | 1,637,635 | | | |
Sri Lanka Government Bond, 15.50%, 1/15/10 | | LKR | | | 457,900 | | | | 4,039,332 | | | |
Sri Lanka Government Bond, 15.50%, 5/15/10 | | LKR | | | 766,310 | | | | 6,883,797 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/6/09 | | LKR | | | 465,000 | | | | 4,043,961 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/6/09 | | LKR | | | 555,200 | | | | 4,828,402 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/8/10 | | LKR | | | 787,200 | | | | 6,745,371 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 1/15/10 | | LKR | | | 1,002,000 | | | | 8,571,377 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 2/5/10 | | LKR | | | 980,450 | | | | 8,345,525 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/9/10 | | LKR | | | 590,820 | | | | 4,949,610 | | | |
Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 4/30/10 | | LKR | | | 59,560 | | | | 497,067 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Sri Lanka | | | | | | |
(identified cost $50,404,006) | | | | | | $ | 50,542,077 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Egypt — 6.2% |
|
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/3/09 | | EGP | | | 109,925 | | | $ | 20,079,540 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/10/09 | | EGP | | | 40,500 | | | | 7,384,053 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/17/09 | | EGP | | | 39,500 | | | | 7,188,235 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 11/24/09 | | EGP | | | 32,350 | | | | 5,875,961 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/1/09 | | EGP | | | 37,750 | | | | 6,843,903 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/8/09 | | EGP | | | 88,775 | | | | 16,064,252 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 12/22/09 | | EGP | | | 20,500 | | | | 3,695,637 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 6/29/10 | | EGP | | | 16,825 | | | | 2,883,322 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 8/3/10 | | EGP | | | 18,950 | | | | 3,217,380 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 9/28/10 | | EGP | | | 16,700 | | | | 2,794,237 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 10/26/10 | | EGP | | | 14,250 | | | | 2,365,089 | | | |
Egypt Treasury Bill, 0.00%, 10/26/10 | | EGP | | | 19,400 | | | | 3,219,840 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Egypt (identified cost $81,022,880) | | $ | 81,611,449 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Foreign Government Securities | | | | | | |
(identified cost $218,494,476) | | | | | | $ | 220,521,849 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Repurchase Agreements(18) — 10.6% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | | | Amount
| | | | | | |
Description | | | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Barclays Bank PLC: | | | | | | | | | | |
Dated 10/15/09, with an interest rate of 0.75%, collateralized by Venezuela Government Bond with an interest rate of 7.75%, a maturity date of 10/13/19 and a market value of $9,954,896. | | | | $ | 9,817 | | | $ | 9,816,537 | | | |
Dated 10/16/09, with an interest rate of 0.80%, collateralized by Venezuela Government Bond with an interest rate of 9.25%, a maturity date of 5/7/28 and a market value of $4,541,708. | | | | | 4,409 | | | | 4,409,306 | | | |
Dated 10/23/09, with an interest rate of 0.75%, collateralized by Venezuela Government Bond with an interest rate of 7.00%, a maturity date of 12/1/18 and a market value of $6,989,722. | | | | | 7,138 | | | | 7,138,211 | | | |
Dated 10/26/09, with an interest rate of 0.80%, collateralized by Argentina Government Bond with an interest rate of 0.943%, a maturity date of 8/3/12 and a market value of 6,957,500.(13) | | | | | 6,899 | | | | 6,899,200 | | | |
Dated 10/8/09, with an interest rate of 0.80%, collateralized by Venezuela Government Bond with an interest rate of 10.75%, a maturity date of 9/19/13 and a market value of $1,929,486. | | | | | 1,954 | | | | 1,954,447 | | | |
Dated 10/9/09, with an interest rate of 0.90%, collateralized by Argentina Government Bond with an interest rate of 0.943%, a maturity date of 8/3/12 and a market value of $5,186,500.(13) | | | | | 4,998 | | | | 4,998,392 | | | |
Dated 7/2/09 with an interest rate of 1.15%, collateralized by Lebanon Government Bond with an interest rate of 7.125%, a maturity date of 3/5/10 and a market value of $5,201,563. | | | | | 5,139 | | | | 5,138,875 | | | |
See notes to financial statements20
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | | | Amount
| | | | | | |
Description | | | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Barclays Bank PLC (continued) |
Dated 8/20/09, with an interest rate of 0.70%, collateralized by Philippines Government Bond with an interest rate of 9.375%, a maturity date of 1/18/17 and a market value of $3,196,745. | | | | $ | 2,972 | | | $ | 2,972,156 | | | |
Dated 9/16/09, with an interest rate of 0.85%, collateralized by Costa Rica Government Bond with an interest rate of 9.995%, a maturity date of 8/1/20 and a market value of $5,238,839. | | | | | 5,147 | | | | 5,147,152 | | | |
Dated 9/16/09, with an interest rate of 0.90%, collateralized by Venezuela Government Bond with an interest rate of 7.65%, a maturity date of 4/21/25 and a market value of $1,228,825. | | | | | 1,419 | | | | 1,418,526 | | | |
Dated 9/18/09, with an interest rate of 1.25%, collateralized by Argentina Government Bond with an interest rate of 0.578%, a maturity date of 4/30/13 and a market value of $4,062,500.(13) | | | | | 3,920 | | | | 3,920,000 | | | |
Dated 9/18/09, with an interest rate of 1.25%, collateralized by Argentina Government Bond with an interest rate of 7.00%, a maturity date of 9/12/13 and a market value of $2,493,750. | | | | | 2,264 | | | | 2,263,800 | | | |
Dated 9/22/09, with an interest rate of 0.95%, collateralized by Argentina Government Bond with an interest rate of 0.943%, a maturity date of 8/3/12 and a market value of $5,534,375.(13) | | | | | 5,145 | | | | 5,145,000 | | | |
Citibank: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dated 10/13/09, with an interest rate of 0.40%, collateralized by Turkey Government Bond with an interest rate of 11.00%, a maturity date of 1/14/13 and a market value of $12,448,889. | | | | | 12,400 | | | | 12,400,000 | | | |
Dated 10/19/09, with an interest rate of 0.40%, collateralized by Turkey Government Bond with an interest rate of 11.00%, a maturity date of 1/14/13 and a market value of $6,224,444. | | | | | 6,211 | | | | 6,210,500 | | | |
Dated 10/23/09, with an interest rate of 0.40%, collateralized by Serbia Government Bond with an interest rate of 3.75%, a maturity date of 11/1/24 and a market value of $10,086,458. | | | | | 10,061 | | | | 10,061,000 | | | |
JPMorgan Chase: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dated 10/15/09, with an interest rate of 0.45%, collateralized by Iraq Government Bond with an interest rate of 5.80%, a maturity date of 1/15/28 and a market value of $7,994,167. | | | | | 7,915 | | | | 7,915,000 | | | |
JPMorgan Chase (continued) |
Dated 10/15/09, with an interest rate of 0.45%, collateralized by Turkey Government Bond with an interest rate of 7.25%, a maturity date of 3/15/15 and a market value of $5,620,313. | | | | | 5,620 | | | | 5,620,000 | | | |
Dated 10/22/09, with an interest rate of 0.45%, collateralized by Indonesia Government Bond with an interest rate of 8.50%, a maturity date of 10/12/35 and a market value of $4,797,000. | | | | | 4,940 | | | | 4,940,000 | | | |
Dated 10/26/09, with an interest rate of 0.45%, collateralized by Colombia Government Bond with an interest rate of 6.125%, a maturity date of 1/18/41 and a market value of $9,517,014. | | | | | 9,510 | | | | 9,510,000 | | | |
Dated 10/26/09, with an interest rate of 0.45%, collateralized by Iraq Government Bond with an interest rate of 5.80%, a maturity date of 1/15/28 and a market value of $3,997,083. | | | | | 3,970 | | | | 3,970,000 | | | |
Dated 10/28/09, with an interest rate of 0.45%, collateralized by Brazil Government Bond with an interest rate of 8.875%, a maturity date of 4/15/24 and a market value of $6,530,990. | | | | | 6,555 | | | | 6,555,000 | | | |
Dated 9/14/09, with an interest rate of 0.45%, collateralized by Mexico Government Bond with an interest rate of 5.875%, a maturity date of 2/17/14 and a market value of $5,409,566. | | | | | 5,400 | | | | 5,400,000 | | | |
Dated 9/28/09, with an interest rate of 0.45%, collateralized by Mexico Government Bond with an interest rate of 6.625%, a maturity date of 3/3/15 and a market value of $5,544,948. | | | | | 5,530 | | | | 5,530,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Repurchase Agreements | | | | | | |
(identified cost $139,333,102) | | | | | | $ | 139,333,102 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements21
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Other Securities — 4.8% |
|
| | | | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(17) | | | | $ | 64,189 | | | $ | 64,189,485 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Other Securities | | | | | | |
(identified cost $64,189,485) | | | | | | $ | 64,189,485 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Short-Term Investments (identified cost $422,017,063) | | $ | 424,044,436 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Investments — 105.7% (identified cost $1,346,213,320) | | $ | 1,394,427,569 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Securities Sold Short — (3.1)% |
|
| | | | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury Obligations — (3.1)% |
|
United States Treasury Bond, 3.50%, 2/15/39 | | | | $ | (23,000,000 | ) | | $ | (20,168,148 | ) | | |
United States Treasury Bond, 5.00%, 5/15/37 | | | | | (18,100,000 | ) | | | (20,387,966 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Securities Sold Short | | | | | | |
(proceeds $40,034,291) | | | | | | $ | (40,556,114 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Currency Options Written — 0.0% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amount of
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Contracts
| | | Strike
| | | Expiration
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Price | | | Date | | | Value | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Japanese Yen Call Option | | | JPY 4,078,000 | | | | JPY 76.3 | | | | 4/8/10 | | | $ | (213,391 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Currency Options Written (premiums received $522,711) | | $ | (213,391 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (2.6)% | | $ | (34,632,079 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 1,319,025,985 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
BRL - Brazilian Real
CRC - Costa Rican Colon
EGP - Egyptian Pound
EUR - Euro
GHS - Ghanaian Cedi
ISK - Icelandic Krona
JPY - Japanese Yen
KRW - South Korean Won
LBP - Lebanese Pound
LKR - Sri Lanka Rupee
PLN - Polish Zloty
TRY - New Turkish Lira
USD - United States Dollar
UYU - Uruguayan Peso
| | |
(1) | | Bond pays a 6.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the IPCA (Amplified Consumer Price Index) as determined by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. The original face is BRL 6,468,000 and the current face is BRL 11,977,204. |
|
(2) | | Bond pays a 1.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on Development Units (Unidades de Desarrollo) as calculated by the General Superintendent of Values. The original face is CRC 1,834,400,000 and the current face is CRC 2,247,311,409. |
|
(3) | | Bond pays a 1.63% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on Development Units (Unidades de Desarrollo) as calculated by the General Superintendent of Values. The original face is CRC 204,500,000 and the current face is CRC 263,302,959. |
|
(4) | | Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees. |
|
(5) | | Currently the issuer is in default with respect to interest payments. |
|
(6) | | Bond pays a 3.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Polish Consumer Price Index. The original face is PLN 26,078,000 and the current face is PLN 29,900,774. |
|
(7) | | Bond pays a 9.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Turkey Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is TRY 12,500,000 and the current face is TRY 12,614,863. |
|
(8) | | Bond pays a 10.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Turkey Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is TRY 16,735,000 and the current face is TRY 20,336,004. |
|
(9) | | Bond pays a 12.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Turkey Inflation Indexed CPI. The original face is TRY 33,400,000 and the current face is TRY 35,255,303. |
|
(10) | | Bond pays a 5.00% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on the Uruguayan inflation rate. The original face is UYU 135,030,000 and the current face is UYU 170,663,510. |
|
(11) | | Bond pays a 3.80% coupon on the face at the end of the payment period. Principal is adjusted based on changes in the Chilean UF (Unidad de Fomento) Rate. The original face is $3,000,000 and the current face is $3,504,414. |
See notes to financial statements22
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | |
(12) | | Security exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, which exempts from registration securities offered and sold outside the United States. Security may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. |
|
(13) | | Floating-rate security. |
|
(14) | | Weighted average fixed-rate coupon that changes/updates monthly. |
|
(15) | | Adjustable rate mortgage security. Rate shown is the rate at October 31, 2009. |
|
(16) | | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged to cover collateral requirements on open financial contracts. |
|
(17) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
|
(18) | | Open repurchase agreements with no specific maturity date. Either party may terminate the agreement upon demand. |
See notes to financial statements23
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $1,282,023,835) | | $ | 1,330,238,084 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $64,189,485) | | | 64,189,485 | | | |
Restricted cash* | | | 3,870,000 | | | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $326,275) | | | 322,922 | | | |
Interest and dividends receivable | | | 8,028,863 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 53,837,823 | | | |
Receivable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 6,459,693 | | | |
Receivable for closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 211,619 | | | |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | | 8,092,767 | | | |
Receivable for closed options | | | 64,634 | | | |
Premium paid on open swap contracts | | | 1,027,084 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 1,476,342,974 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 98,713,272 | | | |
Interest payable for securities sold short | | | 602,908 | | | |
Payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts | | | 222,127 | | | |
Payable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 3,997,175 | | | |
Payable for closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 56,782 | | | |
Payable for open swap contracts | | | 11,739,500 | | | |
Payable for closed swap contracts | | | 342,508 | | | |
Payable for securities sold short, at value | | | | | | |
(proceeds, $40,034,291) | | | 40,556,114 | | | |
Written options outstanding, at value (premiums received, $522,711) | | | 213,391 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 612,708 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 3,013 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 257,491 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 157,316,989 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 1,319,025,985 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 1,272,448,233 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 46,577,752 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 1,319,025,985 | | | |
|
|
| |
* | Represents restricted cash on deposit at custodian for open financial contracts. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest (net of foreign taxes, $302,903) | | $ | 49,891,775 | | | |
Dividends | | | 225,191 | | | |
Interest allocated from affiliated investment | | | 291,728 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (174,296 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 50,234,398 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 5,230,955 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 36,412 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 275,494 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 233,754 | | | |
Interest expense on securities sold short | | | 426,678 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 33,729 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 6,237,022 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 109 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 109 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 6,236,913 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 43,997,485 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (7,352,782 | ) | | |
Securities sold short | | | (150,167 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (1,324,791 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (1,150,063 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (9,006,945 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (18,984,748 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 97,891,288 | | | |
Securities sold short | | | (521,823 | ) | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | (1,430,050 | ) | | |
Swap contracts | | | (3,620,691 | ) | | |
Written options | | | 309,320 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (11,538,105 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 81,089,939 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 62,105,191 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 106,102,676 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements24
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 43,997,485 | | | $ | 44,056,245 | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, securities sold short, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (18,984,748 | ) | | | 7,828,537 | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, securities sold short, financial futures contracts, swap contracts, written options, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 81,089,939 | | | | (36,495,770 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 106,102,676 | | | $ | 15,389,012 | | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 530,666,796 | | | $ | 275,977,287 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (162,764,389 | ) | | | (134,738,001 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | 367,902,407 | | | $ | 141,239,286 | | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 474,005,083 | | | $ | 156,628,298 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 845,020,902 | | | $ | 688,392,604 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 1,319,025,985 | | | $ | 845,020,902 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements25
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1) | | | 0.67 | % | | | 0.63 | % | | | 0.67 | % | | | 0.66 | % | | | 0.66 | % | | |
Interest expense(2) | | | 0.05 | % | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Total expenses | | | 0.72 | % | | | 0.63 | % | | | 0.67 | % | | | 0.66 | % | | | 0.66 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.93 | % | | | 5.25 | % | | | 5.16 | % | | | 4.49 | % | | | 3.23 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 25 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 45 | % | | | 41 | % | | | 59 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 12.10 | % | | | 2.97 | % | | | 10.34 | % | | | 7.60 | % | | | 6.48 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 1,319,026 | | | $ | 845,021 | | | $ | 688,393 | | | $ | 563,226 | | | $ | 410,680 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(2) | | Interest expense relates to interest on securities sold short. |
See notes to financial statements26
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Global Macro Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a non-diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to seek total return. Total return is defined as income plus capital appreciation. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Strategic Income Fund, Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund and Eaton Vance Medallion Strategic Income Fund held an interest of 57.7%, 28.0% and 6.7%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days and excluding most seasoned mortgage-backed securities) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Most seasoned, fixed rate 30-year mortgage-backed securities are valued through the use of the investment adviser’s matrix pricing system, which takes into account bond prices, yield differentials, anticipated prepayments and interest rates provided by dealers. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less (excluding those that are non-U.S. dollar denominated, which typically are valued by a pricing service or dealer quotes) are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Exchange-traded options are valued at the last sale price for the day of valuation as quoted on any exchange on which the option is listed or, in the absence of sales on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore as reported by the Options Price Reporting Authority. Over-the-counter options (including options on securities, indices and foreign currencies) are valued by a third party pricing service using techniques that consider factors including the value of the underlying instrument, the volatility of the underlying instrument and the period of time until option expiration. Financial futures contracts are valued at the settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of the average bid and average asked prices that are reported by currency dealers to a third party pricing service at the valuation time. Such third party pricing service valuations are supplied for specific settlement periods and the Portfolio’s forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at an interpolated rate between the closest preceding and subsequent settlement period reported by the third party pricing service. Interest rate swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. Such pricing service valuations are based on the present value of fixed and projected floating rate cash flows over the term of the swap contract. Future cash flows are discounted to their present value using swap quotations provided by electronic data services or by broker/dealers. Credit default swaps are normally valued using valuations provided by a third party pricing service. The pricing services employ electronic data processing techniques to determine the present value based on credit spread quotations obtained from broker/dealers and expected default recovery rates determined by the pricing service using proprietary models. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly
27
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities in the same manner as debt obligations described above.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. However, if the ex-dividend date has passed, certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as the Portfolio is informed of the ex-dividend date. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends and capital gains have been provided for in accordance with the Portfolio’s understanding of the applicable countries’ tax rules and rates.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising
28
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
I Financial Futures Contracts — The Portfolio may enter into financial futures contracts. The Portfolio’s investment in financial futures contracts is designed for hedging against changes in interest rates or as a substitute for the purchase of securities. Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the Portfolio is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the purchase price (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Portfolio each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Portfolio. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Portfolio may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.
J Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts — The Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. The Portfolio may enter into forward contracts for hedging purposes as well as non-hedging purposes. The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any gains or losses are recorded as unrealized until such time as the contracts have been closed or offset by another contract with the same broker for the same settlement date and currency. Risks may arise upon entering these contracts from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts and from movements in the value of a foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar.
K Written Options — Upon the writing of a call or a put option, the premium received by the Portfolio is included in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability. The amount of the liability is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current market value of the option written, in accordance with the Portfolio’s policies on investment valuations discussed above. Premiums received from writing options which expire are treated as realized gains. Premiums received from writing options which are exercised or are closed are added to or offset against the proceeds or amount paid on the transaction to determine the realized gain or loss. If a put option on a security is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the securities purchased by the Portfolio. The Portfolio, as a writer of an option, may have no control over whether the underlying securities or other assets may be sold (call) or purchased (put) and, as a result, bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the securities or other assets underlying the written option. The Portfolio may also bear the risk of not being able to enter into a closing transaction if a liquid secondary market does not exist.
L Purchased Options — Upon the purchase of a call or put option, the premium paid by the Portfolio is included in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as an investment. The amount of the investment is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current market value of the option purchased, in accordance with the Portfolio’s policies on investment valuations discussed above. If an option which the Portfolio had purchased expires on the stipulated expiration date, the Portfolio will realize a loss in the amount of the cost of the option. If the Portfolio enters into a closing sale transaction, the Portfolio will realize a gain or loss, depending on whether the sales proceeds from the closing sale transaction are greater or less than the cost of the option. If the Portfolio exercises a put option, it will realize a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying security, and the proceeds from such sale will be decreased by the premium originally paid. If the Portfolio exercises a call option, the cost of the security which the Portfolio purchases upon exercise will be increased by the premium originally paid. The risk associated with purchasing options is limited to the premium originally paid.
M Interest Rate Swaps — The Portfolio may enter into interest rate swap agreements to enhance return, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates, or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities. Pursuant to these agreements, the Portfolio either makes floating-rate payments based on a benchmark interest rate in exchange for fixed-rate payments or the Portfolio makes fixed-rate payments in exchange for payments on a floating benchmark interest rate. Payments received or made are recorded as realized
29
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
gains or losses. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between two rates of interest. The Portfolio is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from movements in interest rates.
N Cross-Currency Swaps — Cross-currency swaps are interest rate swaps in which interest cash flows are exchanged between two parties based on the notional amounts of two different currencies. The notional amounts are typically determined based on the spot exchange rates at the inception of the trade. Cross-currency swaps also involve the exchange of the notional amounts at the start of the contract at the current spot rate with an agreement to re-exchange such amounts at a later date at either the same exchange rate, a specified rate or the then current spot rate. The entire principal value of a cross-currency swap is subject to the risk that the counterparty to the swap will default on its contractual delivery obligations.
O Credit Default Swaps — When the Portfolio is the buyer of a credit default swap contract, the Portfolio is entitled to receive the par (or other agreed-upon) value of a referenced debt obligation (or basket of debt obligations) from the counterparty to the contract if a credit event by a third party, such as a U.S. or foreign corporate issuer or sovereign issuer, on the debt obligation occurs. In return, the Portfolio pays the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no credit event has occurred. If no credit event occurs, the Portfolio would have spent the stream of payments and received no benefits from the contract. When the Portfolio is the seller of a credit default swap contract, it receives the stream of payments, but is obligated to pay to the buyer of the protection an amount up to the notional amount of the swap and in certain instances take delivery of securities of the reference entity upon the occurrence of a credit event, as defined under the terms of that particular swap agreement. Credit events are contract specific but may include bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration and repudiation/moratorium. If the Portfolio is the seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Portfolio could be required to make would be an amount equal to the notional amount of the agreement. This potential amount would be partially offset by any recovery value of the respective referenced obligation, or net amount received from the settlement of a buy protection credit default swap agreement entered into by the Portfolio for the same referenced obligation. As the seller, the Portfolio effectively adds leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, the Portfolio is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. The interest fee paid or received on the swap contract, which is based on a specified interest rate on a fixed notional amount, is accrued daily as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and is recorded as realized gain upon receipt or realized loss upon payment. The Portfolio also records an increase or decrease to unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in an amount equal to the daily valuation. Upfront payments or receipts, if any, are recorded as other assets or other liabilities, respectively, and amortized over the life of the swap contract as realized gains or losses. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to the notional amount of the credit default swaps of which it is the seller. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to any unrealized depreciation of the credit default swaps of which it is the buyer, marked to market on a daily basis. These transactions involve certain risks, including the risk that the seller may be unable to fulfill the transaction.
P Total Return Swaps — In a total return swap, the Portfolio makes payments at a rate equal to a predetermined spread to the one or three-month LIBOR. In exchange, the Portfolio receives payments based on the rate of return of a benchmark industry index or basket of securities. During the term of the outstanding swap agreement, changes in the underlying value of the swap are recorded as unrealized gains and losses. Periodic payments received or made are recorded as realized gains or losses. The value of the swap is determined by changes in the relationship between the rate of interest and the benchmark industry index or basket of securities. The Portfolio is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the swap counterparty. Risk may also arise from the unanticipated movements in value of interest rates, securities, or the index.
Q When-Issued Securities and Delayed Delivery Transactions — The Portfolio may purchase or sell securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis, including TBA (To Be Announced) securities. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. At the time the transaction is negotiated, the price of the security that will be delivered is fixed. The Portfolio maintains security positions for these commitments such that sufficient liquid assets will be available to make payments upon settlement. Securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are marked-to-market daily and begin earning interest on settlement date. Losses may arise due to changes in the market value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract.
R Repurchase Agreements — The Portfolio may enter into repurchase agreements with banks and broker-dealers determined to be creditworthy by the Portfolio’s
30
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
investment adviser. Under a repurchase agreement, the Portfolio buys a security at one price and simultaneously promises to sell that same security back to the seller at a higher price for settlement at a later date. At the time the Portfolio enters into a repurchase agreement, it typically receives collateral at least equal to the repurchase price. Repurchase agreements are marked-to-market daily. In the event of bankruptcy of the counterparty or a third party custodian, the Portfolio might experience delays in recovering its cash or experience a loss.
S Securities Sold Short — The Portfolio may seek to hedge investments or increase total return through short sales of securities. A short sale is a transaction in which the Portfolio sells a security it does not own in anticipation of a decline in the market value of that security. To complete such a transaction, the Portfolio may borrow the security to make delivery to the buyer with an obligation to replace such borrowed security at a later date or the Portfolio may sell a security to a forward date without borrowing the security. The proceeds received from a short sale are recorded as a liability and the Portfolio records an unrealized gain or loss to the extent of the difference between the proceeds received and the value of the open short position on the day of determination. A gain, limited to the price at which the Portfolio sold the security short, or a loss, potentially unlimited as there is no upward limit on the price of a security, is recorded when the short position is terminated. Interest payable on securities sold short is recorded as interest expense.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.615% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million, 0.595% from $500 million up to $1 billion and at reduced rates on daily net assets of $1 billion or more, and is payable monthly. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $5,396,144 of which $165,189 was allocated from Cash Management and $5,230,955 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.60% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations and including maturities and paydowns, for the year ended October 31, 2009 were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Purchases | | | | | | |
|
|
Investments (non-U.S. Government) | | $ | 146,397,472 | | | |
U.S. Government and Agency Securities | | | 254,881,022 | | | |
|
|
| | $ | 401,278,494 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Sales | | | | | | |
|
|
Investments (non-U.S. Government) | | $ | 66,653,653 | | | |
U.S. Government and Agency Securities | | | 130,414,926 | | | |
|
|
| | $ | 197,068,579 | | | |
|
|
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 1,351,400,341 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 59,401,813 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (16,374,585 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 43,027,228 | | | |
|
|
The net unrealized depreciation on futures contracts, swaps, foreign currency, and forward foreign currency exchange contracts at October 31, 2009 on a federal income tax basis was $1,414,092.
5 Financial Instruments
The Portfolio may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing
31
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
activities. These financial instruments may include written options, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, financial futures contracts and swap contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Portfolio has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered. A summary of written call options at October 31, 2009 is included in the Portfolio of Investments.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at October 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
|
Sales |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | Deliver | | In Exchange For | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
11/6/09 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 465,000,000 | | United States Dollar 3,994,845 | | $ | (54,002 | ) | | |
11/6/09 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 555,200,000 | | United States Dollar 4,750,578 | | | (83,659 | ) | | |
11/13/09 | | Euro 20,059,386 | | United States Dollar 29,485,893 | | | (33,851 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 59,389,025 | | United States Dollar 516,067 | | | (333 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | South African Rand 125,771,407 | | United States Dollar 16,984,660 | | | 940,615 | | | |
11/23/09 | | South African Rand 89,185,094 | | United States Dollar 12,040,650 | | | 663,743 | | | |
1/8/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 232,000,000 | | United States Dollar 1,967,769 | | | (38,515 | ) | | |
1/8/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 555,200,000 | | United States Dollar 4,707,079 | | | (94,166 | ) | | |
1/15/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 358,000,000 | | United States Dollar 3,037,760 | | | (56,427 | ) | | |
1/15/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 493,387,250 | | United States Dollar 4,196,540 | | | (67,796 | ) | | |
1/15/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 644,000,000 | | United States Dollar 5,466,893 | | | (99,186 | ) | | |
2/5/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 980,450,000 | | United States Dollar 8,354,921 | | | (105,367 | ) | | |
4/1/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 196,503,780 | | United States Dollar 1,685,570 | | | (4,650 | ) | | |
4/9/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 590,820,000 | | United States Dollar 5,071,416 | | | (8,145 | ) | | |
4/30/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 59,560,000 | | United States Dollar 511,245 | | | (198 | ) | | |
5/17/10 | | Sri Lanka Rupee 825,699,025 | | United States Dollar 7,054,242 | | | (28,116 | ) | | |
7/20/10 | | Kazakhstan Tenge 724,740,200 | | United States Dollar 4,446,259 | | $ | (310,575 | ) | | |
7/21/10 | | Kazakhstan Tenge 719,872,000 | | United States Dollar 4,443,654 | | | (280,801 | ) | | |
7/23/10 | | Kazakhstan Tenge 722,665,700 | | United States Dollar 4,454,026 | | | (287,909 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 50,662 | | | |
|
|
Purchases |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | In Exchange For | | Deliver | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
11/4/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 44,390,000,000 | | United States Dollar 4,316,414 | | $ | 330,943 | | | |
11/5/09 | | Mexican Peso 143,624,000 | | United States Dollar 11,092,541 | | | (216,446 | ) | | |
11/5/09 | | Polish Zloty 8,810,000 | | Euro 2,071,747 | | | (4,031 | ) | | |
11/5/09 | | Polish Zloty 70,678,544 | | Euro 16,647,873 | | | (72,381 | ) | | |
11/9/09 | | Indian Rupee 298,540,000 | | United States Dollar 6,318,307 | | | 36,988 | | | |
11/9/09 | | Indian Rupee 271,180,000 | | United States Dollar 5,811,830 | | | (38,972 | ) | | |
11/10/09 | | Indian Rupee 434,383,100 | | United States Dollar 8,899,469 | | | 347,315 | | | |
11/10/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 44,665,000,000 | | United States Dollar 4,408,310 | | | 262,946 | | | |
11/12/09 | | Russian Ruble 189,400,000 | | United States Dollar 6,461,958 | | | 13,927 | | | |
11/12/09 | | Russian Ruble 167,700,000 | | United States Dollar 5,722,085 | | | 11,844 | | | |
11/13/09 | | Australian Dollar 5,786,300 | | United States Dollar 5,199,974 | | | 3,694 | | | |
11/13/09 | | South Korean Won 6,783,300,000 | | United States Dollar 5,810,605 | | | (73,714 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | Indian Rupee 233,600,000 | | United States Dollar 4,816,495 | | | 155,128 | | | |
11/16/09 | | New Turkish Lira 3,933,200 | | United States Dollar 2,678,927 | | | (68,985 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | New Turkish Lira 13,197,861 | | United States Dollar 8,996,497 | | | (238,831 | ) | | |
11/16/09 | | Swedish Krona 38,590,000 | | Euro 3,739,667 | | | (61,873 | ) | | |
11/19/09 | | Malaysian Ringgit 19,030,000 | | United States Dollar 5,678,055 | | | (103,676 | ) | | |
11/19/09 | | Norwegian Krone 16,800,000 | | Euro 2,022,573 | | | (44,123 | ) | | |
32
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts (continued) |
|
Purchases |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | In Exchange For | | Deliver | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
11/19/09 | | Zambian Kwacha 13,734,200,000 | | United States Dollar 2,967,632 | | $ | (14,615 | ) | | |
11/20/09 | | Malaysian Ringgit 20,300,000 | | United States Dollar 6,047,066 | | | (100,816 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | Colombian Peso 13,574,303,631 | | United States Dollar 7,122,814 | | | (348,083 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | Mexican Peso 146,852,000 | | United States Dollar 11,328,114 | | | (233,661 | ) | | |
11/23/09 | | Norwegian Krone 70,861,300 | | Euro 8,466,105 | | | (92,213 | ) | | |
11/25/09 | | Indian Rupee 194,300,000 | | United States Dollar 4,045,388 | | | 88,508 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Australian Dollar 5,954,800 | | United States Dollar 5,481,864 | | | (135,160 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 48,730,000,000 | | United States Dollar 5,027,339 | | | 51,348 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Indonesian Rupiah 40,402,000,000 | | United States Dollar 4,244,799 | | | (34,065 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Norwegian Krone 47,010,000 | | Euro 5,637,569 | | | (94,201 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Serbian Dinar 313,210,000 | | Euro 3,328,480 | | | (576 | ) | | |
12/2/09 | | Brazilian Real 10,916,009 | | United States Dollar 6,177,008 | | | (16,106 | ) | | |
12/4/09 | | Indian Rupee 306,080,000 | | United States Dollar 6,512,340 | | | (2,294 | ) | | |
12/11/09 | | Zambian Kwacha 11,856,500,000 | | United States Dollar 2,226,573 | | | 309,741 | | | |
12/21/09 | | Indian Rupee 193,900,000 | | United States Dollar 4,235,474 | | | (113,724 | ) | | |
12/21/09 | | Zambian Kwacha 11,950,000,000 | | United States Dollar 2,212,963 | | | 336,619 | | | |
1/13/10 | | Indonesian Rupiah 55,064,550,000 | | United States Dollar 5,836,200 | | | (128,255 | ) | | |
1/14/10 | | Indian Rupee 551,810,000 | | United States Dollar 11,912,997 | | | (192,723 | ) | | |
1/21/10 | | Serbian Dinar 485,700,000 | | Euro 5,109,942 | | | (13,955 | ) | | |
1/27/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 11,959,337,900 | | United States Dollar 2,199,216 | | | 329,216 | | | |
4/13/10 | | Ghanaian Cedi 6,220,000 | | United States Dollar 3,918,110 | | | 138,382 | | | |
4/13/10 | | Ghanaian Cedi 66,150 | | United States Dollar 41,809 | | | 1,332 | | | |
5/26/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 13,174,300,000 | | United States Dollar 2,226,893 | | | 445,980 | | | |
5/27/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 12,099,250,000 | | United States Dollar 2,041,723 | | | 412,260 | | | |
7/20/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 44,684,900 | | United States Dollar 4,446,259 | | $ | 316,817 | | | |
7/21/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 43,991,900 | | United States Dollar 4,443,626 | | | 243,137 | | | |
7/23/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 44,107,800 | | United States Dollar 4,455,333 | | | 238,886 | | | |
9/3/10 | | Ukraine Hryvna 29,770,000 | | United States Dollar 2,658,036 | | | 447,929 | | | |
9/28/10 | | Zambian Kwacha 9,769,300,000 | | United States Dollar 1,855,518 | | | 46,830 | | | |
6/15/11 | | China Renminbi 77,900,000 | | United States Dollar 11,785,174 | | | 196,644 | | | |
6/15/11 | | China Renminbi 36,900,000 | | United States Dollar 5,586,677 | | | 88,921 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,411,856 | | | |
|
|
At October 31, 2009, closed forward foreign currency purchases and sales contracts excluded above amounted to a receivable of $211,619 and a payable of $56,782.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Expiration
| | | | | | Aggregate
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Date | | Contracts | | Position | | Cost | | | Value | | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
12/09 | | 53 Euro-Bobl | | Short | | $ | (8,987,338 | ) | | $ | (9,018,070 | ) | | $ | (30,732 | ) | | |
12/09 | | 43 Euro-Bund | | Short | | | (7,675,695 | ) | | | (7,713,952 | ) | | | (38,257 | ) | | |
12/09 | | 21 Japan 10 Year Bond | | Short | | | (32,319,143 | ) | | | (32,192,301 | ) | | | 126,842 | | | |
12/09 | | 12 U.S. 30 Year Treasury Bond | | Short | | | (1,428,989 | ) | | | (1,441,875 | ) | | | (12,886 | ) | | |
12/09 | | 189 U.S. 5 Year Treasury Note | | Short | | | (21,816,910 | ) | | | (22,009,641 | ) | | | (192,731 | ) | | |
12/09 | | 43 U.S. 10 Year Treasury Note | | Short | | | (5,021,443 | ) | | | (5,100,203 | ) | | | (78,760 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (226,524 | ) | | |
|
|
Euro Bobl: Medium-term debt securities issued by the Federal Republic of Germany with a term to maturity of 4.5 to 5 years.
Euro Bund: Long-term debt securities issued by the Federal Republic of Germany with a term to maturity of 8.5 to 10.5 years.
33
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Japan 10 Year Bond: Japanese Government Bonds (JGB) having a maturity of 7 years or more but less than 11 years.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Swaps |
|
| | | | Portfolio
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Notional
| | Pays/
| | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
| | Amount
| | Receives
| | Floating
| | Annual
| | | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | (000’s
| | Floating
| | Rate
| | Fixed
| | | Termination
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
Counterparty | | omitted) | | Rate | | Index | | Rate | | | Date | | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank | | BRL 86,633 | | Pay | | Brazil Interbank Deposit Rate | | | 9.67 | % | | | 1/03/11 | | | $ | (291,880 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (291,880 | ) | | |
|
|
BRL - Brazalian Real
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swaps — Sell Protection |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | Current
| | | | | | |
| | | | Notional
| | Contract
| | | | | Market
| | | Net
| | | |
| | | | Amount*
| | Annual
| | | | | Annual
| | | Unrealized
| | | |
Reference
| | | | (000’s
| | Fixed
| | Termination
| | | Fixed
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
Entity | | Counterparty | | omitted) | | Rate** | | Date | | | Rate*** | | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
Brazil | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | $ | 8,400 | | 5.25% | | | 11/20/09 | | | | 0.36 | % | | $ | 224,939 | | | |
|
|
Colombia | | Credit Suisse First Boston | | | 8,800 | | 4.90 | | | 11/20/09 | | | | 0.96 | | | | 216,886 | | | |
|
|
Iceland | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 5,000 | | 1.70 | | | 3/20/18 | | | | 3.22 | | | | (471,012 | ) | | |
|
|
Iceland | | Credit Suisse First Boston | | | 5,000 | | 1.70 | | | 3/20/18 | | | | 3.22 | | | | (471,012 | ) | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 6,600 | | 1.75 | | | 3/20/18 | | | | 3.22 | | | | (600,452 | ) | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 4,000 | | 1.90 | | | 3/20/18 | | | | 3.22 | | | | (325,212 | ) | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 5,000 | | 2.10 | | | 3/20/23 | | | | 3.07 | | | | (399,248 | ) | | |
|
|
Iceland | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 5,000 | | 2.45 | | | 3/20/23 | | | | 3.07 | | | | (248,514 | ) | | |
|
|
Kazakhstan | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 7,600 | | 9.75 | | | 11/20/09 | | | | 0.82 | | | | 377,313 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (1,696,312 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Credit Default Swaps — Buy Protection |
|
| | | | Notional
| | | Contract
| | | | | | Net
| | | |
| | | | Amount
| | | Annual
| | | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
Reference
| | | | (000’s
| | | Fixed
| | | Termination
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
Entity | | Counterparty | | omitted) | | | Rate** | | | Date | | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
Austria | | Barclays Bank PLC | | $ | 8,800 | | | | 0.44 | % | | | 12/20/13 | | | $ | 22,145 | | | |
|
|
Austria | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 3,700 | | | | 1.42 | | | | 3/20/14 | | | | (143,853 | ) | | |
|
|
Brazil | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 9,000 | | | | 1.65 | | | | 9/20/19 | | | | (67,095 | ) | | |
|
|
Greece | | Credit Suisse First Boston | | | 20,000 | | | | 0.20 | | | | 6/20/20 | | | | 2,173,174 | | | |
|
|
Greece | | Goldman Sachs, Inc. | | | 35,000 | | | | 0.29 | | | | 6/20/15 | | | | 2,001,203 | | | |
|
|
Greece | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 20,000 | | | | 0.13 | | | | 9/20/17 | | | | 1,799,720 | | | |
|
|
Italy | | Credit Suisse First Boston | | | 18,200 | | | | 0.20 | | | | 12/20/16 | | | | 672,243 | | | |
|
|
Lebanon | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 5,500 | | | | 1.00 | (1) | | | 12/20/14 | | | | (43,675 | ) | | |
|
|
Lebanon | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 4,600 | | | | 3.30 | | | | 9/20/14 | | | | (150,749 | ) | | |
|
|
Malaysia | | Bank of America | | | 3,900 | | | | 0.83 | | | | 12/20/14 | | | | 21,300 | | | |
|
|
Malaysia | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 7,800 | | | | 0.82 | | | | 12/20/14 | | | | 45,503 | | | |
|
|
Malaysia | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 7,400 | | | | 2.40 | | | | 3/20/14 | | | | (499,533 | ) | | |
|
|
Malaysia | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 7,300 | | | | 2.45 | | | | 3/20/14 | | | | (508,518 | ) | | |
Philippines | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 8,000 | | | | 1.84 | | | | 12/20/14 | | | $ | (23,722 | ) | | |
|
|
Philippines | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 3,800 | | | | 1.84 | | | | 12/20/14 | | | | (11,268 | ) | | |
|
|
Philippines | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 5,000 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 6/20/11 | | | | (62,795 | ) | | |
|
|
Philippines | | Credit Suisse First Boston | | | 5,000 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 6/20/11 | | | | (62,795 | ) | | |
|
|
Philippines | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 5,000 | | | | 1.88 | | | | 6/20/11 | | | | (62,795 | ) | | |
|
|
Serbia | | HSBC Bank USA | | | 7,000 | | | | 1.30 | | | | 5/20/11 | | | | 221,179 | | | |
|
|
South Africa | | Bank of America | | | 6,300 | | | | 1.00 | (1) | | | 12/20/19 | | | | (12,027 | ) | | |
|
|
South Africa | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 6,300 | | | | 1.00 | (1) | | | 12/20/19 | | | | (56,452 | ) | | |
|
|
Thailand | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 7,500 | | | | 0.97 | | | | 9/20/19 | | | | 123,834 | | | |
|
|
Thailand | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 7,700 | | | | 0.86 | | | | 12/20/14 | | | | 84,992 | | | |
|
|
Thailand | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 3,700 | | | | 0.95 | | | | 9/20/19 | | | | 67,167 | | | |
|
|
Thailand | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 3,900 | | | | 0.87 | | | | 12/20/14 | | | | 41,169 | | | |
|
|
Turkey | | Barclays Bank PLC | | | 4,170 | | | | 2.12 | | | | 1/20/13 | | | | (105,557 | ) | | |
|
|
Turkey | | Citigroup Global Markets | | | 9,400 | | | | 2.93 | | | | 9/20/19 | | | | (601,369 | ) | | |
|
|
Turkey | | Credit Suisse First Boston | | | 4,120 | | | | 2.11 | | | | 1/20/13 | | | | (102,894 | ) | | |
|
|
Turkey | | Credit Suisse First Boston | | | 5,000 | | | | 2.87 | | | | 7/20/11 | | | | (193,405 | ) | | |
|
|
Turkey | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 12,610 | | | | 2.12 | | | | 1/20/13 | | | | (319,203 | ) | | |
|
|
Turkey | | JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | 10,000 | | | | 3.16 | | | | 4/20/10 | | | | (127,870 | ) | | |
|
|
Turkey | | Morgan Stanley | | | 5,000 | | | | 4.05 | | | | 4/06/14 | | | | (480,934 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 3,637,120 | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | If the Portfolio is the seller of credit protection, the notional amount is the maximum potential amount of future payments the Portfolio could be required to make if a credit event, as defined in the credit default swap agreement, were to occur. At October 31, 2009, such maximum potential amount for all open credit default swaps in which the Portfolio is the seller was $55,400,000. |
|
** | | The contract annual fixed rate represents the fixed rate of interest received by the Portfolio (as a seller of protection) or paid by the Portfolio (as a buyer of protection) annually on the notional amount of the credit default swap contract. |
|
*** | | Current market annual fixed rates, utilized in determining the net unrealized appreciation or depreciation as of period end, serve as an indicator of the market’s perception of the current status of the payment/performance risk associated with the credit derivative. The current market annual fixed rate of a particular reference entity reflects the cost, as quoted by the pricing vendor, of selling protection against default of that entity as of period end and may include upfront payments required to be made to enter into the agreement. The higher the fixed rate, the greater the market perceived risk of a credit event involving the reference entity. A rate identified as “Defaulted” indicates a credit event has occurred for the reference entity. |
|
(1) | | Upfront payment is exchanged with the counterparty as a result of the standardized trading coupon. |
34
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return Swaps |
|
| | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | | | | |
| | Notional
| | Expiration | | | | Unrealized
| | | | | | |
Counterparty | | Amount | | Date | | Portfolio Pays | | Portfolio Receives | | Depreciation | | | | | | |
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank | | $2,400,621 | | 8/25/10 | | 1-Month USD LIBOR-BBA+50 bp | | Total Return on JPMorgan Abu Dhabi Index | | $ | (70,997 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | $ | (70,997 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cross-Currency Swaps |
|
| | Notional
| | Notional
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | Amount
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | on Fixed
| | on Floating
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Rate
| | Rate
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Currency
| | (Currency
| | | | | | | | | | | Net
| | | |
| | Received)
| | Delivered)
| | | Floating
| | Fixed
| | | Termination
| | | Unrealized
| | | |
Counterparty | | (000’s omitted) | | (000’s omitted) | | | Rate | | Rate | | | Date | | | Depreciation | | | |
|
Citigroup Global Markets | | TRY 4,000 | | $ | 2,475 | | | 3 Month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 11.95% | | | | 2/15/12 | | | $ | (565,569 | ) | | |
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets | | TRY 8,441 | | $ | 5,091 | | | 3 Month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 12.10 | | | | 2/15/12 | | | | (1,339,865 | ) | | |
|
|
Citigroup Global Markets | | TRY 12,367 | | $ | 7,361 | | | 3 Month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 12.46 | | | | 8/14/13 | | | | (1,683,569 | ) | | |
|
|
Credit Suisse | | TRY 6,790 | | $ | 3,922 | | | 3 Month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 12.45 | | | | 2/15/12 | | | | (1,246,359 | ) | | |
|
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank | | TRY 13,609 | | $ | 9,252 | | | 3 Month USD-LIBOR-BBA | | | 11.20 | | | | 5/21/14 | | | | (389,302 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | (5,224,664 | ) | | |
|
|
TRY - New Turkish Lira
The Portfolio pays interest on the currency received and receives interest on the currency delivered. At the termination date, the notional amount of the currency received will be exchanged for the notional amount of the currency delivered.
Written currency call options activity for the year ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Principal
| | | | | |
| | Amount of Contracts
| | Premiums
| | | |
| | (000’s omitted) | | Received | | | |
|
Outstanding, beginning of year | | — | | $ | — | | | |
Options written | | JPY 4,078,000 | | | 522,711 | | | |
|
|
Outstanding, end of year | | JPY 4,078,000 | | $ | 522,711 | | | |
|
|
JPY - Japanese Yen
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815-10), effective May 1, 2009. Such standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. The disclosure below includes additional information as a result of implementing FAS 161.
In the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives, the Portfolio is subject to the following risks:
Credit Risk: The Portfolio may enter into credit default swap contracts to manage its credit risk, to gain exposure to a credit in which the Portfolio may otherwise invest, or to enhance return.
Equity Risk: The Portfolio may enter into total return swap agreements on a security, basket of securities or an index to enhance return, to change the duration of the overall portfolio, to hedge against fluctuations in securities prices or interest rates or as substitution for the purchase or sale of securities.
Foreign Exchange Risk: The Portfolio holds foreign currency denominated investments. The value of these investments and related receivables and payables may change due to future changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To hedge against this risk, the Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The Portfolio may also enter into such contracts to hedge the currency risk of investments it anticipates purchasing. The Portfolio may also purchase or write currency option contracts to enhance return.
Interest Rate Risk: The Portfolio holds fixed-rate bonds. The value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. To hedge against this risk, the Portfolio may enter into interest rate and cross-currency swap contracts. The Portfolio may also purchase and sell U.S. Treasury and foreign debt futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
The Portfolio enters into swap contracts and forward foreign currency exchange contracts that may contain provisions whereby the counterparty may terminate the contract under certain conditions, including but not limited to a decline in the Portfolio’s net assets below a certain level over a certain period of time, which would trigger a payment by the Portfolio for those derivatives in a liability position. At October 31, 2009, the fair value of derivatives with credit-related contingent features in a net liability position was $3,712,570. The aggregate fair value of assets pledged as collateral by the Portfolio for such liability was $7,140,292 at October 31, 2009.
The non-exchange traded derivatives in which the Portfolio invests, including swap contracts, over-the-counter options and forward foreign currency exchange
35
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
contracts, are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the contract fails to perform its obligations under the contract. The Portfolio is not subject to counterparty credit risk with respect to its written options as the Portfolio, not the counterparty, is obligated to perform under such derivatives. At October 31, 2009, the maximum amount of loss the Portfolio would incur due to counterparty risk was $15,330,605, representing the fair value of such derivatives in an asset position. Such amount would be increased by any unamortized upfront payments made by the Portfolio. To mitigate this risk, the Portfolio has entered into master netting agreements with substantially all its derivative counterparties, which allows it and a counterparty to aggregate amounts owed by each of them for derivative transactions under the agreement into a single net amount payable by either the Portfolio or the counterparty. At October 31, 2009, the maximum amount of loss the Portfolio would incur due to counterparty risk would be reduced by approximately $11,113,000 due to master netting agreements. Counterparties may be required to pledge collateral in the form of cash, U.S. Government securities or highly-rated bonds for the benefit of the Portfolio if the net amount due from the counterparty with respect to a derivative contract exceeds a certain threshold. The amount of collateral posted by the counterparties with respect to such contracts would also reduce the amount of any loss incurred.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) by risk exposure at October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value |
Statement of Assets and
| | | | | | | | Foreign
| | | Interest
| | | |
Liabilities Caption | | Credit | | | Equity | | | Exchange | | | Rate | | | |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 566,526 | | | $ | — | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 126,842 | * | | |
Receivable for open and closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,671,312 | | | | — | | | |
Receivable for open swap contracts | | | 8,092,767 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total Asset Derivatives | | $ | 8,092,767 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 7,237,838 | | | $ | 126,842 | | | |
|
|
Written options outstanding, at value | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (213,391 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (353,366 | )* | | |
Payable for open and closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | (4,053,957 | ) | | | — | | | |
Payable for open swap contracts | | | (6,151,959 | ) | | | (70,997 | ) | | | — | | | | (5,516,544 | ) | | |
|
|
Total Liability Derivatives | | $ | (6,151,959 | ) | | $ | (70,997 | ) | | $ | (4,267,348 | ) | | $ | (5,869,910 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount represents cumulative unrealized appreciation or (depreciation) on futures contracts in the Futures Contracts table above. Only the current day’s variation margin on open futures contracts is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as Receivable or Payable for variation margin, as applicable. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) by risk exposure for the six months ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Foreign
| | | | | | |
Statement of Operations Caption | | Credit | | | Equity | | | Exchange | | | Interest Rate | | | |
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (159,120 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,021,689 | | | |
Written options | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Swap contracts | | | 146,540 | | | | 1,004,865 | | | | — | | | | (88,302 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,347,885 | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 146,540 | | | $ | 1,004,865 | | | $ | 3,188,765 | | | $ | 1,933,387 | | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | (159,409 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
Financial futures contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (1,702,750 | ) | | |
Written options | | | | | | | — | | | | 272,054 | | | | — | | | |
Swap contracts | | | 2,251,649 | | | | (155,005 | ) | | | — | | | | (3,552,815 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,794,889 | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 2,251,649 | | | $ | (155,005 | ) | | $ | 3,907,534 | | | $ | (5,255,565 | ) | | |
|
|
The average notional amounts of futures contracts, forward foreign currency exchange contracts, and swap contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009, which are indicative of the volume of these derivative types, were approximately $95,138,000, $337,333,000, and $341,867,412, respectively. The average principal amount of purchased option contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009 was approximately $36,053,000.
6 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each
36
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
7 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by entities whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Portfolio, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign securities markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
8 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Foreign Government Bonds | | $ | — | | | $ | 116,324,861 | | | $ | 2,353,740 | | | $ | 118,678,601 | | | |
Foreign Corporate Bonds & Notes | | | — | | | | 10,052,479 | | | | — | | | | 10,052,479 | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes | | | — | | | | 1,646,193 | | | | — | | | | 1,646,193 | | | |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | | | — | | | | 104,625,479 | | | | — | | | | 104,625,479 | | | |
Mortgage Pass-Throughs | | | — | | | | 687,056,210 | | | | — | | | | 687,056,210 | | | |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | | | — | | | | 35,259,106 | | | | — | | | | 35,259,106 | | | |
U.S. Government Agency Bonds | | | — | | | | 5,563,135 | | | | | | | | 5,563,135 | | | |
U.S. Treasury Obligations | | | — | | | | 2,081,485 | | | | — | | | | 2,081,485 | | | |
Common Stocks | | | — | | | | 4,364,717 | | | | — | | | | 4,364,717 | | | |
Investment Companies | | | 489,202 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 489,202 | | | |
Currency Options Purchased | | | — | | | | 566,526 | | | | — | | | | 566,526 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 64,189,485 | | | | 359,854,951 | | | | — | | | | 424,044,436 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 64,678,687 | | | $ | 1,327,395,142 | | | $ | 2,353,740 | | | $ | 1,394,427,569 | | | |
|
|
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,671,312 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,671,312 | | | |
Swaps Contracts | | | — | | | | 8,092,767 | | | | — | | | | 8,092,767 | | | |
Futures Contracts | | | 126,842 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 126,842 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 64,805,529 | | | $ | 1,342,159,221 | | | $ | 2,353,740 | | | $ | 1,409,318,490 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Currency Options Written | | $ | — | | | $ | (213,391 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (213,391 | ) | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | | — | | | | (4,053,957 | ) | | | — | | | | (4,053,957 | ) | | |
Swaps Contracts | | | — | | | | (11,739,500 | ) | | | — | | | | (11,739,500 | ) | | |
Futures Contracts | | | (353,366 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (353,366 | ) | | |
Securities Sold Short | | | — | | | | (40,556,114 | ) | | | — | | | | (40,556,114 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | (353,366 | ) | | $ | (56,562,962 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (56,916,328 | ) | | |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
37
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investments in
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Foreign
| | | Investments in
| | | | | | |
| | Government
| | | Short-Term
| | | | | | |
| | Bonds | | | Investments | | | Total | | | |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 | | $ | 5,728,740 | | | $ | 5,083,165 | | | $ | 10,811,905 | | | |
Realized gains (losses) | | | — | | | | (783,393 | ) | | | (783,393 | ) | | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)* | | | (1,058,120 | ) | | | 227,260 | | | | (830,860 | ) | | |
Net purchases (sales) | | | — | | | | (4,527,032 | ) | | | (4,527,032 | ) | | |
Accrued discount (premium) | | | (5,605 | ) | | | — | | | | (5,605 | ) | | |
Net transfers to (from) Level 3 | | | (2,311,275 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,311,275 | ) | | |
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 | | $ | 2,353,740 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,353,740 | | | |
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments still held as of October 31, 2009* | | $ | (654,608 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (654,608 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount is included in the related amount on investments in the Statement of Operations. |
9 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 23, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
38
Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Global Macro Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Global Macro Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits. The supplementary data for the year ended October 31, 2006, and all prior periods presented, were audited by other auditors. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on that supplementary data in their report dated December 27, 2006.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Global Macro Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the three years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 23, 2009
39
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund as of October 31, 2009
Global Macro Portfolio
SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS (Unaudited)
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
The Fund held a joint Special Meeting of Shareholders on October 23, 2009 (adjourned from September 25, 2009) to approve an amendment to the current fundamental investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale of physical commodities and commodities contracts to provide that the Fund may invest in all types of commodities, commodities contracts and commodities related investments to the extent permitted by law. The following action was taken by the shareholders:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Number of Shares | | | |
For | | Against | | | Abstain | | | |
|
|
5,965,875 | | | 101,029 | | | | 128,960 | | | |
Global Macro Portfolio
The Portfolio held a joint Special Meeting of Interestholders on October 23, 2009 (adjourned from September 25, 2009) to approve an amendment to the current fundamental investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale of physical commodities and commodities contracts to provide that the Portfolio may invest in all types of commodities, commodities contracts and commodities related investments to the extent permitted by law. The following action was taken by the interestholders:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Interest in the Portfolio | | | |
For | | Against | | | Abstain | | | |
|
|
79% | | | 5 | % | | | 6 | % | | |
Results are rounded to the nearest whole number.
40
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
41
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement between Eaton Vance Global Macro Fund (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (“EVM”), as well as the investment advisory agreement for Global Macro Portfolio, the portfolio in which the Fund invests (the “Portfolio”), with Boston Management and Research (“BMR”), an affiliate of EVM (EVM, with respect to the Fund, and BMR, with respect to the Portfolio, are each referred to herein as the “Adviser”), including the fee structure of each agreement, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreements. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreements. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreements for the Fund and Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreements of the Fund and the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services to be provided to the Fund by EVM and Portfolio by BMR.
The Board considered EVM’s and BMR’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments to be held by the Fund and the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Fund and the Portfolio, including recent changes to such personnel. The Board specifically noted EVM’s and BMR’s expertise with respect to global markets and in-house research capabilities. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund and Portfolio by senior management. The Board noted that, under the terms of the investment advisory agreement of the Fund, EVM may invest assets of the Fund directly in securities, for which it would receive a fee, or in the Portfolio, for which it receives no separate fee but for which BMR receives an advisory fee from the Portfolio. The Trustees considered the potential benefits to the Fund of the ability to make direct investments, such as an improved ability to: manage the Fund’s duration, or other general market exposures, using certain derivatives; add exposure to specific market sectors or asset classes without changing the Portfolio’s investments, which would affect any other fund investing in the Portfolio; hedge some of the general market risks of the Portfolio while retaining the value added by the individual manager; and hedge a portion of the exposures of the Portfolio while retaining others (e.g., hedging the U.S. government exposure of the Portfolio while retaining its exposure to high-grade corporate bonds).
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
42
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by EVM and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreements.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees, including administrative fees, and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered the fact that the Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses for the Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees proposed to be charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Portfolio, the Fund and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Portfolio and the Fund.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
43
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Global Macro Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
44
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Since 1998 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President | | Of the Trust since 2008 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President | | Of the Trust since 2008 and of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 80 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
45
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Eric Stein 4/18/80 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 1 registered investment company managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Vice President of the Trust since 2007 and President of the Portfolio since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
46
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Global Macro Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Investment Adviser and Administrator of
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Principal Underwriter*
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer Agent
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9ce2/c9ce2209a09f699689d6bd12ec95e575c8bc5c14" alt="(PHOTO OF AAMER KHAN)"
Aamer Khan, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | Although global equity markets began the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, on a downward trajectory, stocks bounced strongly off the bottom set in early March and staged a broad-based rally that continued through the end of the 12-month period. Last fall, on the verge of a possible collapse of the global financial system, risk-averse investors reacted by streaming to the sidelines, sending stocks into a dramatic decline. By late winter, however, fiscal and monetary interventions by governments around the world began to fuel optimism that the financial crisis would end and global economic growth might resume. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c31b/3c31b7a3989214752a688a1e50c19d9dc4bee374" alt="(PHOTO OF THOMAS H. LUSTER)"
Thomas H. Luster, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | Amid prospects for a better-than-expected 2009, investor risk appetite began to return, overcoming such lingering concerns as high consumer debt levels, rising unemployment and still-depressed home prices. Corporate profits also started showing improvement, benefiting from cost-cutting and easier earnings comparisons, which further supported the equity market’s rebound. Stocks that declined the most last fall, especially those lower-quality, cyclical issues farther out on the risk spectrum, tended to be those that recovered most quickly as the rally gained steam. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fa1f/7fa1f950fef1f0dae7c527537d9e16b160c0b0a3" alt="(PHOTO OF JUDITH A. SARYAN)"
Judith A. Saryan, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | From March through September 2009, the broad-based S&P 500 Index posted strong gains, with only a slight pull back in October ending a string of consecutive monthly gains. For the full one-year period that ended October 31, 2009, the S&P 500 posted a 9.80% return, while the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 7.76% and the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index soared 18.84%. The large-cap Russell 1000 Index returned 11.20%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index gained 6.46%.1 In terms of investment styles, growth stocks widely outperformed their counterparts in the value space. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Management Discussion
• | | The Fund posted a gain for the 12-month period ending October 31, 2009, significantly outperforming its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index (the Index). This outperformance was the combined result of favorable sector allocation and solid security selection, with the Fund’s underrepresentation versus the Index in energy and health care sectors making contributions, along with rewarding stock selection in both these sectors, as well as in materials. |
|
• | | Conversely, inopportune security selection within pockets of the financials, information technology and consumer discretionary sectors were the biggest detractors from the Fund’s relative performance. In particular, the Fund underperformed the Index with some of its selections in the capital markets, computers/peripherals, and hotels/restaurants/leisure industries. |
|
• | | Consistent with its objective of achieving after-tax total return consisting mainly of tax-favored dividend income and capital appreciation, the Fund was invested primarily in common and preferred stocks that generated a relatively high level of qualified dividend income during the period. For the 12 months ending October 31, 2009, the Fund had approximately 16% of its total assets in preferred stocks. Within the common stock portion of the portfolio, the Fund maintained a |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08 - 10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A2 | | | 10.49 | % |
Class B2 | | | 9.57 | |
Class C2 | | | 9.57 | |
Class I2 | | | 10.63 | |
Russell 1000 Value Index1 | | | 4.78 | |
Lipper Equity Income Funds Average1 | | | 9.29 | |
See pages 3 and 4 for more performance information, including after-tax returns.
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
2 | | These returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
1
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
| | near-market weighting in energy and an overweighting in utilities, both sectors that tend to represent significant numbers of dividend-paying stocks. |
|
• | | Beginning with the February 2009 distribution, the Fund’s monthly distribution rate was reduced from $0.066 to 0.0462 per share. The adjustment to the monthly distribution rate reflects the reduced amount of dividend income the Fund expects to receive due to the impact of the ongoing financial crisis on corporate dividend rates and the increased costs of implementing the Fund’s dividend capture strategy. Since its inception, the Fund has increased its monthly distribution rate eight times and made one special distribution. At the current distribution level, the Fund’s monthly distribution equates to a rate that is higher than it was on the Fund’s inception date of May 30, 2003. As portfolio and market conditions change, the rate of distributions on the Fund’s shares may change as well. |
|
• | | As always, we thank you for your continued confidence and participation in the Fund. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Fund’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Fund Composition
Top 10 Holdings1
By net assets
| | | | |
Johnson & Johnson | | | 3.1 | % |
Nestle SA | | | 3.1 | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | | | 2.9 | |
Schering-Plough Corp. | | | 2.8 | |
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 2.8 | |
BP PLC ADR | | | 2.7 | |
Sanofi-Aventis SA | | | 2.6 | |
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. | | | 2.4 | |
Canadian National Railway Co. | | | 2.2 | |
ENI SpA | | | 2.2 | |
| | |
1 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 26.8% of the Fund’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
Sector Weightings2
By net assets
| | |
2 | | As a percentage of the Fund’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
2
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class B of the Fund with that of the Russell 1000 Value Index, a broad-based, unmanaged market index of U.S. value stocks. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class B and the Russell 1000 Value Index. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57ac5/57ac5e7136628c23dfce966891f92dc0854e7e83" alt="(FLOW CHART)"
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class B of the Fund commenced investment operations on 5/30/03. |
|
| | A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class A shares and Class C shares on 5/30/03 (commencement of operations) and Class I shares on 8/27/07 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $12,870 ($12,130 including the maximum applicable sales charge), $12,272 and $7,500, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EADIX | | EBDIX | | ECDIX | | EIDIX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 10.49 | % | | | 9.57 | % | | | 9.57 | % | | | 10.63 | % |
Five Years | | | 1.41 | | | | 0.65 | | | | 0.65 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.00 | | | | 3.24 | | | | 3.24 | | | | -12.36 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 4.12 | % | | | 4.57 | % | | | 8.57 | % | | | 10.63 | % |
Five Years | | | 0.21 | | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.65 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.05 | | | | 3.24 | | | | 3.24 | | | | -12.36 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates — Class A, Class B and Class C: 5/30/03; Class I: 8/27/07 |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class B shares reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 0.90 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
“Return Before Taxes” does not take into consideration shareholder taxes. It is most relevant to tax-free or tax-deferred shareholder accounts. “Return After Taxes on Distributions” reflects the impact of federal income taxes due on Fund distributions of dividends and capital gains. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who continue to hold their shares. “Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares” also reflects the impact of taxes on capital gain or loss realized upon a sale of shares. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who sell their shares.
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 10.49 | % | | | 1.41 | % | | | 4.00 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 8.74 | | | | 0.39 | | | | 3.08 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 7.66 | | | | 1.18 | | | | 3.43 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 4.12 | % | | | 0.21 | % | | | 3.05 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 2.47 | | | | -0.79 | | | | 2.13 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 3.47 | | | | 0.16 | | | | 2.59 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 9.57 | % | | | 0.65 | % | | | 3.24 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 8.01 | | | | -0.24 | | | | 2.43 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 6.98 | | | | 0.55 | | | | 2.77 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 8.57 | % | | | 0.65 | % | | | 3.24 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 7.01 | | | | -0.24 | | | | 2.43 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 6.33 | | | | 0.55 | | | | 2.77 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 9.57 | % | | | 0.65 | % | | | 3.24 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 8.00 | | | | -0.24 | | | | 2.43 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 6.98 | | | | 0.55 | | | | 2.77 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 4.57 | % | | | 0.34 | % | | | 3.24 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 3.00 | | | | -0.56 | | | | 2.43 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 3.73 | | | | 0.28 | | | | 2.77 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class I)
| | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 10.63 | % | | | -12.36 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 8.83 | | | | -13.19 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 7.78 | | | | -10.27 | |
Class A, Class B and Class C commenced investment operations on 5/30/03. Class I commenced investment operations on 8/27/07. Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) reflect the deduction of the maximum initial sales charge and applicable CDSC, while Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) do not.
After-tax returns are calculated using certain assumptions. After-tax returns are calculated using the highest historical individual federal income tax rates and do not reflect the impact of state and local taxes. Actual after-tax returns depend on a shareholder’s tax situation and the actual characterization of distributions and may differ from those shown. After-tax returns are not relevant to shareholders who hold shares in tax-deferred accounts or to shares held by non-taxable entities. Return After Taxes on Distributions for a period may be the same as Return Before Taxes for the same period because no distributions were made during that period, or because the taxable portion of distributions made during the period was insignificant. Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares for a period may be greater than or equal to Return After Taxes on Distributions for the same period because of losses realized on the sale of Fund shares.
4
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,224.70 | | | | $6.79 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,220.80 | | | | $10.97 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,219.20 | | | | $10.96 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,226.20 | | | | $5.22 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.10 | | | | $6.16 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.30 | | | | $9.96 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.30 | | | | $9.96 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.50 | | | | $4.74 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.21% for Class A shares, 1.96% for Class B shares, 1.96% for Class C shares and 0.93% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. | |
5
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 82.4% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense — 0.7% |
|
General Dynamics Corp. | | | 141,458 | | | $ | 8,869,417 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,869,417 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverages — 2.1% |
|
Diageo PLC ADR | | | 400,000 | | | $ | 26,008,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 26,008,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets — 3.1% |
|
Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (The) | | | 185,000 | | | $ | 4,932,100 | | | |
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | | | 80,000 | | | | 13,613,600 | | | |
Northern Trust Corp. | | | 400,000 | | | | 20,100,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 38,645,700 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 0.5% |
|
Terra Industries, Inc. | | | 175,000 | | | $ | 5,559,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,559,750 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 1.5% |
|
Banco Santander Brasil SA ADR(1) | | | 300,000 | | | $ | 3,558,000 | | | |
U.S. Bancorp | | | 623,421 | | | | 14,475,836 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 18,033,836 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies — 0.8% |
|
Waste Management, Inc. | | | 350,000 | | | $ | 10,458,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,458,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals — 2.0% |
|
International Business Machines Corp. | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 24,122,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 24,122,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Construction Materials — 1.1% |
|
Lafarge SA | | | 160,000 | | | $ | 12,987,182 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,987,182 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 7.1% |
|
AT&T, Inc. | | | 810,625 | | | $ | 20,808,744 | | | |
CenturyTel, Inc. | | | 300,000 | | | | 9,738,000 | | | |
France Telecom SA | | | 830,000 | | | | 20,566,391 | | | |
Koninklijke KPN NV | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 18,138,737 | | | |
Windstream Corp. | | | 1,950,000 | | | | 18,798,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 88,049,872 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 3.6% |
|
Edison International | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 6,364,000 | | | |
Enel SpA | | | 2,800,000 | | | | 16,660,867 | | | |
Fortum Oyj | | | 850,000 | | | | 20,118,514 | | | |
Scottish and Southern Energy PLC | | | 88,182 | | | | 1,556,388 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 44,699,769 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment — 0.4% |
|
ABB, Ltd. | | | 250,000 | | | $ | 4,650,336 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,650,336 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services — 3.7% |
|
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. | | | 310,000 | | | $ | 29,527,500 | | | |
Schlumberger, Ltd. | | | 250,000 | | | | 15,550,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 45,077,500 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food & Staples Retailing — 1.7% |
|
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | | | 298,769 | | | $ | 14,842,844 | | | |
Wesfarmers, Ltd. | | | 269,092 | | | | 6,714,745 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 21,557,589 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 3.1% |
|
Nestle SA | | | 818,000 | | | $ | 38,038,275 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 38,038,275 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 2.8% |
|
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 590,000 | | | $ | 34,579,900 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 34,579,900 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Durables — 0.6% |
|
Whirlpool Corp. | | | 100,000 | | | $ | 7,159,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,159,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 2.6% |
|
MetLife, Inc. | | | 575,000 | | | $ | 19,567,250 | | | |
Prudential Financial, Inc. | | | 275,000 | | | | 12,438,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 32,005,500 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 2.3% |
|
BHP Billiton, Ltd. ADR | | | 150,000 | | | $ | 9,837,000 | | | |
Southern Copper Corp. | | | 600,000 | | | | 18,900,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 28,737,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multi-Utilities — 3.9% |
|
CMS Energy Corp. | | | 875,000 | | | $ | 11,637,500 | | | |
DTE Energy Co. | | | 300,000 | | | | 11,094,000 | | | |
GDF Suez | | | 298,790 | | | | 12,491,648 | | | |
PG&E Corp. | | | 300,000 | | | | 12,267,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 47,490,148 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 14.6% |
|
BP PLC ADR | | | 580,000 | | | $ | 32,839,600 | | | |
Chevron Corp. | | | 327,000 | | | | 25,028,580 | | | |
ENI SpA | | | 1,080,000 | | | | 26,748,129 | | | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | | | 500,000 | | | | 35,835,000 | | | |
Marathon Oil Corp. | | | 400,000 | | | | 12,788,000 | | | |
Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Class A | | | 650,000 | | | | 19,190,294 | | | |
Total SA | | | 250,000 | | | | 14,960,075 | | | |
Total SA ADR | | | 200,000 | | | | 12,014,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 179,403,678 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Personal Products — 0.9% |
|
Avon Products, Inc. | | | 330,000 | | | $ | 10,576,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,576,500 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals — 9.5% |
|
Abbott Laboratories | | | 235,000 | | | $ | 11,883,950 | | | |
Johnson & Johnson | | | 650,000 | | | | 38,382,500 | | | |
Sanofi-Aventis SA | | | 435,000 | | | | 31,886,466 | | | |
Schering-Plough Corp. | | | 1,235,375 | | | | 34,837,575 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 116,990,491 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) — 1.8% |
|
Annaly Capital Management, Inc. | | | 1,300,000 | | | $ | 21,983,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 21,983,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Road & Rail — 3.3% |
|
Canadian National Railway Co. | | | 570,000 | | | $ | 27,496,800 | | | |
Union Pacific Corp. | | | 230,000 | | | | 12,682,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 40,179,000 | | | |
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 1.8% |
|
Analog Devices, Inc. | | | 875,000 | | | $ | 22,426,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 22,426,250 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail — 2.5% |
|
Buckle, Inc. (The) | | | 330,000 | | | $ | 9,903,300 | | | |
Home Depot, Inc. | | | 843,696 | | | | 21,168,333 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 31,071,633 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods — 0.7% |
|
VF Corp. | | | 125,000 | | | $ | 8,880,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,880,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Tobacco — 1.7% |
|
Philip Morris International, Inc. | | | 450,000 | | | $ | 21,312,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 21,312,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 2.0% |
|
Vodafone Group PLC | | | 11,200,000 | | | $ | 24,682,859 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 24,682,859 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $871,191,624) | | $ | 1,014,234,185 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred Stocks — 15.5% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Capital Markets — 0.7% |
|
Morgan Stanley, 4.00%(2) | | | 440,000 | | | $ | 8,404,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,404,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 6.6% |
|
Abbey National Capital Trust I, 8.963%(2) | | | 1,750 | | | $ | 1,750,023 | | | |
ABN AMRO North America Capital Funding Trust, 6.968%(2)(3) | | | 4,000 | | | | 2,110,000 | | | |
BBVA International SA Unipersonal, 5.919%(2) | | | 3,500 | | | | 2,811,371 | | | |
Credit Agricole SA/London, 6.637%(2)(3) | | | 10,400 | | | | 8,608,850 | | | |
DB Capital Funding VIII, 6.375% | | | 85,410 | | | | 1,828,628 | | | |
DB Contingent Capital Trust II, 6.55% | | | 160,000 | | | | 3,265,600 | | | |
HSBC Capital Funding LP, 10.176%(2)(3) | | | 3,250 | | | | 4,018,664 | | | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 7.90%(2) | | | 16,000 | | | | 16,143,280 | | | |
Landsbanki Islands HF, 7.431%(2)(3)(4) | | | 14,750 | | | | 8,850 | | | |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Commercial Banks (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Lloyds Banking Group PLC, 6.657%(2)(3) | | | 114 | | | $ | 7,729,668 | | | |
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., Series F, 9.875%(2) | | | 270,000 | | | | 7,492,500 | | | |
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 7.64%(2) | | | 115 | | | | 5,716,408 | | | |
Santander Finance Unipersonal, 10.50% | | | 112,694 | | | | 3,083,308 | | | |
Standard Chartered PLC, 6.409%(2)(3) | | | 103 | | | | 8,314,871 | | | |
Wells Fargo & Co., 7.50% | | | 5,350 | | | | 4,788,250 | | | |
Wells Fargo & Co., 7.98%(2) | | | 3,400 | | | | 3,234,726 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 80,904,997 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services — 3.2% |
|
American Express Co., 6.80%(2) | | | 2,406 | | | $ | 2,156,428 | | | |
Auction Pass-Through Trust 2006-5B - USB H, 0.00%(2)(3) | | | 40 | | | | 1,000 | | | |
Auction Pass-Through Trust 2006-6B - USB H, 0.00%(2)(3) | | | 40 | | | | 1,000 | | | |
Bank of America Corp., 6.25% | | | 92,900 | | | | 1,630,395 | | | |
Bank of America Corp., 6.70% | | | 387,350 | | | | 7,150,481 | | | |
CoBank, ACB, 11.00%(3) | | | 300,000 | | | | 14,015,640 | | | |
General Electric Capital Corp., 6.375%(2) | | | 1,094 | | | | 982,500 | | | |
Preferred Pass-Through Trust, 2006-A GS, Class A, 5.876%(2)(3) | | | 70 | | | | 14,185,318 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 40,122,762 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 0.2% |
|
Entergy Arkansas, Inc., 6.45% | | | 47,500 | | | $ | 1,007,893 | | | |
Southern California Edison Co., 6.00% | | | 15,000 | | | | 1,297,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,305,393 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 0.1% |
|
Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc., 6.25%(3) | | | 13,250 | | | $ | 844,688 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 844,688 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 3.6% |
|
Aegon NV, 6.375% | | | 205,000 | | | $ | 3,403,000 | | | |
Arch Capital Group, Ltd., Series A, 8.00% | | | 185,500 | | | | 4,489,100 | | | |
Arch Capital Group, Ltd., Series B, 7.875% | | | 26,500 | | | | 627,520 | | | |
AXA SA, 6.463%(2)(3) | | | 5,000 | | | | 4,315,595 | | | |
Endurance Specialty Holdings, Ltd., 7.75% | | | 181,550 | | | | 3,975,945 | | | |
ING Capital Funding Trust III, 8.439%(2) | | | 11,750 | | | | 10,408,867 | | | |
MetLife, Inc., 6.50% | | | 350,000 | | | | 7,605,500 | | | |
PartnerRe, Ltd., 6.50% | | | 52,000 | | | | 1,118,000 | | | |
PartnerRe, Ltd., 6.75% | | | 139,700 | | | | 3,091,561 | | | |
RAM Holdings, Ltd., Series A, 7.50%(2) | | | 5,000 | | | | 250,312 | | | |
RenaissanceRe Holdings, Ltd., 6.08% | | | 82,000 | | | | 1,535,040 | | | |
RenaissanceRe Holdings, Ltd., 6.60% | | | 175,000 | | | | 3,606,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 44,427,190 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 0.5% |
|
Kinder Morgan GP, Inc., 8.33%(2)(3) | | | 7,000 | | | $ | 6,525,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,525,750 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) — 0.6% |
|
AMB Property Corp., 6.75% | | | 29,900 | | | $ | 612,651 | | | |
Duke Realty Corp., 6.95% | | | 120,000 | | | | 2,299,200 | | | |
Health Care Property, Inc., 7.10% | | | 150,000 | | | | 3,180,000 | | | |
ProLogis Trust, 6.75% | | | 29,300 | | | | 578,675 | | | |
PS Business Parks, Inc., 7.95% | | | 26,000 | | | | 621,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,291,926 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Preferred Stocks | | |
(identified cost $233,481,228) | | $ | 190,826,706 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes — 1.6% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
| | Amount
| | | | | | |
Security | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 0.6% |
|
Capital One Capital V, 10.25%, 8/15/39 | | $ | 6,000 | | | $ | 6,864,930 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,864,930 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Retail-Food and Drug — 1.0% |
|
CVS Caremark Corp., 6.302%, 6/1/37(2) | | $ | 15,000 | | | $ | 12,907,335 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,907,335 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes | | |
(identified cost $18,440,210) | | $ | 19,772,265 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 1.4% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(5) | | $ | 17,810 | | | $ | 17,810,297 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $17,810,297) | | $ | 17,810,297 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 100.9% | | |
(identified cost $1,140,923,359) | | $ | 1,242,643,453 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (0.9)% | | $ | (11,289,431 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 1,231,354,022 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
ADR - American Depositary Receipt
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(2) | | Variable rate security. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at October 31, 2009. |
|
(3) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $70,679,894 or 5.7% of the Fund’s net assets. |
|
(4) | | Defaulted security. |
|
(5) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Country Concentration |
|
| | Percentage
| | | | | | |
Country | | of Net Assets | | | Value | | | |
|
|
United States | | | 77.6 | % | | $ | 955,442,250 | | | |
France | | | 7.5 | | | | 92,891,762 | | | |
United Kingdom | | | 3.7 | | | | 45,429,541 | | | |
Italy | | | 3.5 | | | | 43,408,996 | | | |
Switzerland | | | 3.5 | | | | 42,688,611 | | | |
Finland | | | 1.6 | | | | 20,118,514 | | | |
Netherlands | | | 1.5 | | | | 18,138,737 | | | |
Australia | | | 0.6 | | | | 6,714,745 | | | |
|
|
Long-Term Investments | | | 99.5 | % | | $ | 1,224,833,156 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | | | | $ | 17,810,297 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | | | | | $ | 1,242,643,453 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $1,123,113,062) | | $ | 1,224,833,156 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $17,810,297) | | | 17,810,297 | | | |
Cash | | | 632,000 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 2,980,970 | | | |
Dividends and interest receivable | | | 2,437,653 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 6,400,572 | | | |
Tax reclaims receivable | | | 2,782,465 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 1,257,877,113 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 20,462,638 | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 4,015,020 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 714,102 | | | |
Administration fee | | | 161,079 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 619,182 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 4,208 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 546,862 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 26,523,091 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 1,231,354,022 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 1,768,810,443 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss | | | (643,678,737 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 4,350,806 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 101,871,510 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 1,231,354,022 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 670,391,777 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 74,104,205 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.05 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 9.60 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 89,245,022 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 9,886,154 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.03 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 451,077,839 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 49,959,561 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.03 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 20,639,384 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 2,280,035 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.05 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends (net of foreign taxes, $4,288,869) | | $ | 84,466,888 | | | |
Interest | | | 1,113,102 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 206,352 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (128,743 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 85,657,599 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 6,984,160 | | | |
Administration fee | | | 1,694,993 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 1,568,901 | | | |
Class B | | | 850,384 | | | |
Class C | | | 4,133,645 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 48,377 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 465,033 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 1,133,182 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 62,663 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 189,979 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 74,747 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 67,244 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 17,273,308 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | | 17 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 17 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 17,273,291 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 68,384,308 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (252,965,712 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | 129,710 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (252,836,002 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 291,101,452 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 348,430 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 291,449,882 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 38,613,880 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 106,998,188 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 68,384,308 | | | $ | 120,279,637 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (252,836,002 | ) | | | (345,703,307 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 291,449,882 | | | | (498,383,853 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 106,998,188 | | | $ | (723,807,523 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (46,780,231 | ) | | $ | (63,970,171 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (5,783,393 | ) | | | (8,505,890 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (27,937,044 | ) | | | (38,497,628 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (294,140 | ) | | | (64,070 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (80,794,808 | ) | | $ | (111,037,759 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 198,868,435 | | | $ | 266,401,511 | | | |
Class B | | | 11,922,386 | | | | 16,020,877 | | | |
Class C | | | 91,736,031 | | | | 130,221,388 | | | |
Class I | | | 20,005,688 | | | | 2,375,343 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 31,702,195 | | | | 43,709,066 | | | |
Class B | | | 3,644,144 | | | | 5,316,986 | | | |
Class C | | | 15,726,285 | | | | 21,289,921 | | | |
Class I | | | 189,276 | | | | 40,804 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (256,529,212 | ) | | | (327,279,717 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (20,640,613 | ) | | | (31,280,249 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (122,515,325 | ) | | | (161,997,125 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (1,416,174 | ) | | | (424,363 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 4,351,537 | | | | 5,783,728 | | | |
Class B | | | (4,351,537 | ) | | | (5,783,728 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (27,306,884 | ) | | $ | (35,605,558 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (1,103,504 | ) | | $ | (870,450,840 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 1,232,457,526 | | | $ | 2,102,908,366 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 1,231,354,022 | | | $ | 1,232,457,526 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 4,350,806 | | | $ | 16,914,325 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | Year Ended April 30, |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.830 | | | $ | 14.520 | | | $ | 13.400 | | | $ | 12.990 | | | $ | 11.820 | | | $ | 10.640 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.523 | | | $ | 0.862 | | | $ | 0.810 | | | $ | 0.239 | | | $ | 0.922 | | | $ | 0.743 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.311 | | | | (5.751 | ) | | | 1.080 | | | | 0.534 | | | | 0.889 | | | | 0.989 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.834 | | | $ | (4.889 | ) | | $ | 1.890 | | | $ | 0.773 | | | $ | 1.811 | | | $ | 1.732 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.614 | ) | | $ | (0.801 | ) | | $ | (0.770 | ) | | $ | (0.363 | ) | | $ | (0.641 | ) | | $ | (0.552 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.614 | ) | | $ | (0.801 | ) | | $ | (0.770 | ) | | $ | (0.363 | ) | | $ | (0.641 | ) | | $ | (0.552 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.050 | | | $ | 8.830 | | | $ | 14.520 | | | $ | 13.400 | | | $ | 12.990 | | | $ | 11.820 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 10.49 | % | | | (35.08 | )% | | | 14.47 | % | | | 6.14 | %(4) | | | 15.78 | % | | | 16.54 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 670,392 | | | $ | 673,782 | | | $ | 1,141,383 | | | $ | 659,950 | | | $ | 452,785 | | | $ | 215,759 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5) | | | 1.21 | % | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.14 | % | | | 1.19 | %(7) | | | 1.21 | %(6) | | | 1.25 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 6.38 | % | | | 7.00 | % | | | 5.72 | % | | | 3.69 | %(7) | | | 7.49 | % | | | 6.46 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 101 | % | | | 181 | % | | | 139 | % | | | 46 | %(4) | | | 247 | % | | | 162 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the six month period ended October 31, 2006. During the period ended October 31, 2006, the Fund changed its fiscal year end from April 30 to October 31. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee and/or the administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.01% and 0.01%, of average daily net assets for the years ended April 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively). Absent this waiver and/or subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements12
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | Year Ended April 30, |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.820 | | | $ | 14.490 | | | $ | 13.370 | | | $ | 12.960 | | | $ | 11.790 | | | $ | 10.630 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.463 | | | $ | 0.772 | | | $ | 0.716 | | | $ | 0.200 | | | $ | 0.801 | | | $ | 0.648 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.300 | | | | (5.736 | ) | | | 1.064 | | | | 0.526 | | | | 0.919 | | | | 0.986 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.763 | | | $ | (4.964 | ) | | $ | 1.780 | | | $ | 0.726 | | | $ | 1.720 | | | $ | 1.634 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.553 | ) | | $ | (0.706 | ) | | $ | (0.660 | ) | | $ | (0.316 | ) | | $ | (0.550 | ) | | $ | (0.474 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.553 | ) | | $ | (0.706 | ) | | $ | (0.660 | ) | | $ | (0.316 | ) | | $ | (0.550 | ) | | $ | (0.474 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.030 | | | $ | 8.820 | | | $ | 14.490 | | | $ | 13.370 | | | $ | 12.960 | | | $ | 11.790 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 9.57 | % | | | (35.51 | )% | | | 13.62 | % | | | 5.76 | %(7) | | | 14.97 | % | | | 15.57 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 89,245 | | | $ | 97,996 | | | $ | 181,741 | | | $ | 143,731 | | | $ | 120,272 | | | $ | 79,871 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4) | | | 1.96 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 1.89 | % | | | 1.94 | %(6) | | | 1.96 | %(5) | | | 2.00 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.67 | % | | | 6.26 | % | | | 5.08 | % | | | 3.11 | %(6) | | | 6.53 | % | | | 5.65 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 101 | % | | | 181 | % | | | 139 | % | | | 46 | %(7) | | | 247 | % | | | 162 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the six month period ended October 31, 2006. During the period ended October 31, 2006, the Fund changed its fiscal year end from April 30 to October 31. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee and/or the administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.01% and 0.01% of average daily net assets for the years ended April 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively). Absent this waiver and/or subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(6) | | Annualized. |
|
(7) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements13
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | Year Ended April 30, |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.820 | | | $ | 14.500 | | | $ | 13.370 | | | $ | 12.960 | | | $ | 11.800 | | | $ | 10.630 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.460 | | | $ | 0.769 | | | $ | 0.704 | | | $ | 0.192 | | | $ | 0.817 | | | $ | 0.653 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.303 | | | | (5.742 | ) | | | 1.086 | | | | 0.534 | | | | 0.893 | | | | 0.991 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.763 | | | $ | (4.973 | ) | | $ | 1.790 | | | $ | 0.726 | | | $ | 1.710 | | | $ | 1.644 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.553 | ) | | $ | (0.707 | ) | | $ | (0.660 | ) | | $ | (0.316 | ) | | $ | (0.550 | ) | | $ | (0.474 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.553 | ) | | $ | (0.707 | ) | | $ | (0.660 | ) | | $ | (0.316 | ) | | $ | (0.550 | ) | | $ | (0.474 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.030 | | | $ | 8.820 | | | $ | 14.500 | | | $ | 13.370 | | | $ | 12.960 | | | $ | 11.800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 9.57 | % | | | (35.51 | )% | | | 13.63 | % | | | 5.76 | %(4) | | | 14.87 | % | | | 15.66 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 451,078 | | | $ | 458,907 | | | $ | 779,330 | | | $ | 490,056 | | | $ | 350,758 | | | $ | 185,303 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5) | | | 1.96 | % | | | 1.90 | % | | | 1.89 | % | | | 1.94 | %(7) | | | 1.96 | %(6) | | | 2.00 | %(6) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.63 | % | | | 6.25 | % | | | 4.98 | % | | | 2.98 | %(7) | | | 6.65 | % | | | 5.69 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 101 | % | | | 181 | % | | | 139 | % | | | 46 | %(4) | | | 247 | % | | | 162 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the six month period ended October 31, 2006. During the period ended October 31, 2006, the Fund changed its fiscal year end from April 30 to October 31. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee and/or the administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.01% and 0.01%, of average daily net assets for the years ended April 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively). Absent this waiver and/or subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements14
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | October 31, 2007(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value – Beginning of period | | $ | 8.840 | | | $ | 14.530 | | | $ | 14.100 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.479 | | | $ | 0.681 | | | $ | 0.054 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.365 | | | | (5.538 | ) | | | 0.514 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.844 | | | $ | (4.857 | ) | | $ | 0.568 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.634 | ) | | $ | (0.833 | ) | | $ | (0.138 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.634 | ) | | $ | (0.833 | ) | | $ | (0.138 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value – End of period | | $ | 9.050 | | | $ | 8.840 | | | $ | 14.530 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 10.63 | % | | | (34.84 | )% | | | 4.04 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 20,639 | | | $ | 1,773 | | | $ | 453 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4) | | | 0.94 | % | | | 0.90 | % | | | 0.89 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.71 | % | | | 5.95 | % | | | 2.06 | %(5) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 101 | % | | | 181 | % | | | 139 | %(6) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, August 27, 2007, to October 31, 2007. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(5) | | Annualized. |
|
(6) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements15
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund’s investment objective is to achieve after-tax total return by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of common and preferred stocks. The Fund offers four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income and losses, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. The value of preferred equity securities that are valued by a pricing service on a bond basis will be adjusted by an income factor, to be determined by the investment adviser, to reflect the next anticipated regular dividend. Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Fund in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for
16
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Fund may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities based on available market quotations provided by a third party pricing service.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. However, if the ex-dividend date has passed, certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as the Fund is informed of the ex-dividend date. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends and capital gains have been provided for in accordance with the Fund’s understanding of the applicable countries’ tax rules and rates. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $628,426,598 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2011 ($252,492), October 31, 2012 ($2,039,433), October 31, 2013 ($4,586,180), October 31, 2014 ($31,957,656), October 31, 2015 ($6,082,839), October 31, 2016 ($324,890,175) and October 31, 2017 ($258,617,823).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
F Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
G Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
H Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
I Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the
17
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make monthly distributions of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 80,794,808 | | | $ | 111,037,759 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $153,019 and accumulated undistributed net investment income was decreased by $153,019 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss) and distributions from real estate investment trusts. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | | $(628,426,598) | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | | $ 4,564,079 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | $ 86,406,098 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales and investment in partnerships.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by EVM as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.65% of the Fund’s average daily net assets up to $500 million, 0.625% from $500 million up to $1 billion, 0.600% from $1 billion up to $2.5 billion and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Fund’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Fund’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund’s investment adviser fee totaled $7,106,855 of which $122,695 was allocated from Cash Management and $6,984,160 was paid or accrued directly by the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.63% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. The administration fee is earned by EVM for administering the business affairs of the Fund and is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $1,694,993. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $53,849 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $210,354 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund who are not members of EVM’s organization, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Fund who are not affiliated with EVM may elect to defer receipt of all or a
18
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund are officers of EVM.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $1,568,901 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $637,788 and $3,100,233 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $5,712,000 and $46,162,000, respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $212,596 and $1,033,412 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $50,000, $266,000 and $57,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $1,120,496,299 and $1,138,870,676, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund and classes). Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
19
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 24,861,105 | | | | 21,673,137 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 3,891,387 | | | | 3,604,769 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (31,476,909 | ) | | | (28,062,001 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 550,078 | | | | 480,151 | | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (2,174,339 | ) | | | (2,303,944 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,464,264 | | | | 1,295,321 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 448,849 | | | | 438,744 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (2,592,258 | ) | | | (2,674,975 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (551,246 | ) | | | (481,183 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (1,230,391 | ) | | | (1,422,093 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 11,264,316 | | | | 10,566,813 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,934,627 | | | | 1,761,020 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (15,283,577 | ) | | | (14,041,253 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (2,084,634 | ) | | | (1,713,420 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class I | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 2,227,604 | | | | 206,676 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 22,893 | | | | 3,693 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (170,974 | ) | | | (41,076 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 2,079,523 | | | | 169,293 | | | |
|
|
8 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Fund at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 1,156,388,771 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 146,142,708 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (59,888,026 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 86,254,682 | | | |
|
|
9 Line of Credit
The Fund participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Fund solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Fund based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Fund did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
10 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by companies whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Fund, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign securities markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
11 Fair Value Measurements
The Fund adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
20
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | |
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Fund’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer Discretionary | | $ | 81,690,533 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 81,690,533 | | | |
Consumer Staples | | | 72,739,344 | | | | 44,753,020 | | | | — | | | | 117,492,364 | | | |
Energy | | | 163,582,680 | | | | 60,898,498 | | | | — | | | | 224,481,178 | | | |
Financials | | | 110,668,036 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 110,668,036 | | | |
Health Care | | | 85,104,025 | | | | 31,886,466 | | | | — | | | | 116,990,491 | | | |
Industrials | | | 59,506,417 | | | | 4,650,336 | | | | — | | | | 64,156,753 | | | |
Information Technology | | | 46,548,250 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 46,548,250 | | | |
Materials | | | 34,296,750 | | | | 12,987,182 | | | | — | | | | 47,283,932 | | | |
Telecommunication Services | | | 49,344,744 | | | | 63,387,987 | | | | — | | | | 112,732,731 | | | |
Utilities | | | 41,362,500 | | | | 50,827,417 | | | | — | | | | 92,189,917 | | | |
|
|
Total Common Stocks | | $ | 744,843,279 | | | $ | 269,390,906 | * | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,014,234,185 | | | |
|
|
Preferred Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer Staples | | $ | — | | | $ | 844,688 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 844,688 | | | |
Energy | | | — | | | | 6,525,750 | | | | — | | | | 6,525,750 | | | |
Financials | | | 74,387,504 | | | | 106,763,371 | | | | — | | | | 181,150,875 | | | |
Utilities | | | 1,297,500 | | | | 1,007,893 | | | | — | | | | 2,305,393 | | | |
|
|
Total Preferred Stocks | | $ | 75,685,004 | | | $ | 115,141,702 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 190,826,706 | | | |
|
|
Corporate Bonds & Notes | | $ | — | | | $ | 19,772,265 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 19,772,265 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 17,810,297 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 17,810,297 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 838,338,580 | | | $ | 404,304,873 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,242,643,453 | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Includes foreign equity securities whose values were adjusted to reflect market trading that occurred after the close of trading in their applicable foreign markets. |
The Fund held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
12 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 18, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
21
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance
Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 18, 2009
22
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of dividend income for individuals and the dividends received deduction for corporations.
Qualified Dividend Income. The Fund designates $82,069,808 or up to the maximum amount of such dividend allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15.0%.
Dividends Received Deduction. Corporate shareholders are generally entitled to take the dividends received deduction on the portion of the Fund’s dividend distribution that qualifies under tax law. For the Fund’s fiscal 2009 ordinary income dividends, 38.53% qualifies for the corporate dividends received deduction.
23
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
24
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Fund, including recent changes to such personnel. The Board evaluated the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as special considerations relevant to investing in dividend-paying common and preferred stock. In particular, the Board evaluated the Adviser’s in-house equity research capabilities and experience in managing funds that seek to maximize after-tax returns. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following
25
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. On the basis of the foregoing and other relevant information, the Board concluded that, under the circumstances, the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Fund’s management fees (including administrative fees) and total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser in connection with its relationship with the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Fund and other investment advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the Adviser’s profitability may have been affected by such increases or decreases. The Board also concluded that the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and the Fund.
26
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President | | Trustee since 2007 and President since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
27
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Since 1998 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
28
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
29
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser and Administrator of
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
*FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
• | | International equity markets experienced a dramatic turnaround during the 12 months ending October 31, 2009. As the period began late last fall, global equities were already in the midst of a dramatic free fall, dragged lower by the failure or near-collapse of several major financial institutions struggling under the enormous weight of troubled assets. On the verge of illiquidity, the credit markets virtually ceased operating, worldwide economic activity ground to a near standstill, and anxious equity investors stayed on the sidelines. At the beginning of the second quarter, however, equity markets began a rally in response to indications that the concerted global effort by world banks to alleviate the credit crisis and stimulate economic growth was succeeding. The volatile period finished on a decidedly positive note, with many market indexes for European, U.S. and Asian equities posting solid annual gains. |
Edward R. Allen, III, CFA
Eagle Global Advisors
Co-Portfolio Manager
Thomas N. Hunt, III, CFA
Eagle Global Advisors
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | Although economic conditions across much of the world remained challenging at period end, signs continued to accumulate for an improvement in outlook. Recently, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) raised its forecasts for world growth for the remainder of 2009 and into 2010. The countries of continental Europe, particularly France and Germany, were poised for positive growth and indicators of business sentiment have been rising. The United Kingdom, assisted by an expansive monetary policy by the Bank of England and a sharply depreciated currency, continued to show signs of economic stabilization. Japan, where the strong yen has been complicating the country’s rebound by discouraging its exports, recently elected the Democratic Party of Japan (DJP) political party to power, ending decades of long dominance of the Liberal Democratic Party in politics. It remains to be seen what changes the DJP will push and whether those changes will be positive from an economic standpoint. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Management Discussion
• | | Against this backdrop, the Fund1 underperformed its benchmark, the MSCI Europe, Australasia, Far East Index (the MSCI EAFE Index) for the year ending October 31, 2009.2 The initial phase of the 2009 bull market was largely driven by the return of risk appetite - investors looking to capitalize on lower-quality companies, including those under financial stress, resulting in a boost for small-cap stocks. The Fund’s lack of exposure to these low-quality stocks, as well as its large-cap focus, led to its underperformance early in the rally. Overall, positive stock selection led to Fund returns more closely tracking the MSCI EAFE Index since April, although not enough to offset underperformance in March and April. |
• | | The financials sector was the biggest factor in the Fund’s relative underperformance. Financials accounted for approximately one quarter of the MSCI EAFE Index’s weight and contributed the most to its returns. However, the Fund was underweighted in the sector all year, which hurt performance. Stock selection also detracted, especially the Fund’s investments in the consumer finance industry. An underweighting to materials and an overweighting to health care further dampened the Fund’s performance relative to the MSCI EAFE Index. Conversely, the Fund’s stock selection in the energy sector added to relative returns. |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08-10/31/09 | | | | |
Class A3 | | | 16.22 | % |
Class B3 | | | 15.41 | |
Class C3 | | | 15.40 | |
Class I3 | | | 16.69 | |
MSCI EAFE Index2 | | | 27.71 | |
Lipper International Large-Cap Core Funds Average2 | | | 23.97 | |
See pages 3 and 4 for more performance information, including after-tax returns.
| | |
1 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, Tax- Managed International Equity Portfolio, with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
2 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index returns reflect dividends net of any applicable foreign withholding taxes. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. Class A and Class I shares are subject to a 1.00% redemption fee if redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of settlement of purchase. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
1
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | Despite the second half rally elsewhere in the world, Japan was the worst performing market for the year (performance based on U.S. dollars). The Fund was underweighted in Japanese stocks, which aided its performance, as all Japanese sectors did poorly, underperforming the overall MSCI EAFE Index. |
• | | Emerging markets enjoyed a strong year, with some economies proving more resilient to the financial crisis and global recession than anticipated. Asian economies, mostly led by global trade, were poised to improve in the second half of 2009. In Latin America, Mexico seemed likely to track the U.S. in an economic recovery, while Brazil proved more resilient to external shocks. After an initial paring back late in 2008, the Fund’s weighting in emerging markets increased over the year, which — along with stock selection — was a big contributor to performance. |
• | | Our investment philosophy and process remain consistent: investing in a diversified portfolio of foreign equity securities with favorable growth prospects, competitive positions and strong balance sheets. As we have experienced in prior recoveries, we believe market leadership will continue to rotate from high-risk, low-quality companies to high-quality companies that can deliver revenue growth as the economic recovery matures. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
Global Allocation1
By net assets
| | |
1 | | As a percentage of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
| | | | |
Top 10 Holdings2 | | | | |
By net assets | | | | |
| | | | |
Banco Santander Central Hispano SA | | | 4.2 | % |
Nestle SA | | | 3.3 | |
Total SA | | | 3.2 | |
Novartis AG | | | 3.2 | |
British American Tobacco PLC | | | 2.9 | |
Mitsui & Co., Ltd. | | | 2.7 | |
DBS Group Holdings, Ltd. | | | 2.6 | |
Petroleo Brasileiro SA ADR | | | 2.5 | |
Telefonica SA | | | 2.3 | |
BOC Hong Kong Holdings, Ltd. | | | 2.2 | |
| | |
2 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 29.1% of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
2
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the MSCI EAFE Index, a broad-based, unmanaged market index of international stocks. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A and the Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 4/22/98. |
A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class B shares and Class C shares on 10/31/99 and Class I shares on 9/2/08 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $6,914, $6,924, and $7,647, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index returns reflect dividends net of any applicable foreign witholding taxes.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | ETIGX | | EMIGX | | ECIGX | | EITIX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 16.22 | % | | | 15.41 | % | | | 15.40 | % | | | 16.69 | % |
Five Years | | | 4.95 | | | | 4.16 | | | | 4.19 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | -2.88 | | | | -3.62 | | | | -3.61 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | -0.83 | | | | -1.59 | | | | -1.59 | | | | -20.62 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 9.52 | % | | | 10.41 | % | | | 14.40 | % | | | 16.69 | % |
Five Years | | | 3.72 | | | | 3.82 | | | | 4.19 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | -3.45 | | | | -3.62 | | | | -3.61 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | -1.34 | | | | -1.59 | | | | -1.59 | | | | -20.62 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates — Class A, Class B and Class C: 4/22/98; Class 1:9/2/08 |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class B shares reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class A and Class I shares are subject to a 1.00% redemption fee if redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of settlement of purchase. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Expense Ratio | | | 1.54 | % | | | 2.29 | % | | | 2.29 | % | | | 1.23 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
“Return Before Taxes” does not take into consideration shareholder taxes. It is most relevant to tax-free or tax-deferred shareholder accounts. “Return After Taxes on Distributions” reflects the impact of federal income taxes due on Fund distributions of dividends and capital gains. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who continue to hold their shares. “Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares” also reflects the impact of taxes on capital gain or loss realized upon a sale of shares. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who sell their shares.
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 16.22 | % | | | 4.95 | % | | | -2.88 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 16.50 | | | | 5.07 | | | | -2.81 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 11.41 | | | | 4.55 | | | | -2.24 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 9.52 | % | | | 3.72 | % | | | -3.45 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 9.79 | | | | 3.83 | | | | -3.38 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 7.01 | | | | 3.47 | | | | -2.71 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 15.40 | % | | | 4.19 | % | | | -3.61 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 15.92 | | | | 4.35 | | | | -3.49 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 10.69 | | | | 3.84 | | | | -2.84 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 14.40 | % | | | 4.19 | % | | | -3.61 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 14.92 | | | | 4.35 | | | | -3.49 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 10.04 | | | | 3.84 | | | | -2.84 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 15.41 | % | | | 4.16 | % | | | -3.62 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 16.02 | | | | 4.34 | | | | -3.50 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 10.59 | | | | 3.79 | | | | -2.87 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 10.41 | % | | | 3.82 | % | | | -3.62 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 11.02 | | | | 4.00 | | | | -3.50 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 7.34 | | | | 3.49 | | | | -2.87 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class I)
| | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 16.69 | % | | | -20.62 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 16.90 | | | | -19.04 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 11.79 | | | | -15.94 | |
Class A, Class B and Class C of the Fund commenced investment operations on 4/22/98. Class I commenced investment operations on 9/2/08. Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) reflect the deduction of the maximum initial sales charge and applicable CDSC, while Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) do not.
After-tax returns are calculated using certain assumptions. After-tax returns are calculated using the highest historical individual federal income tax rates and do not reflect the impact of state and local taxes. Actual after-tax returns depend on a shareholder’s tax situation and the actual characterization of distributions and may differ from those shown. After-tax returns are not relevant to shareholders who hold shares in tax-deferred accounts or to shares held by non-taxable entities. Return After Taxes on Distributions for a period may be the same as Return Before Taxes for the same period because no taxable distributions were made during that period, or because the taxable portion of distributions made during the period was insignificant. Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares for a period may be greater than or equal to Return After Taxes on Distributions for the same period because of losses realized on the sale of Fund shares. The Fund’s after-tax returns also may reflect foreign tax credits passed by the Fund to its shareholders.
4
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,313.00 | | | | $9.97 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,307.90 | | | | $14.31 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,308.20 | | | | $14.31 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,315.00 | | | | $8.58 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.60 | | | | $8.69 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,012.80 | | | | $12.48 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,012.80 | | | | $12.48 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.80 | | | | $7.48 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.71% for Class A shares, 2.46% for Class B shares, 2.46% for Class C shares and 1.47% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
5
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $95,376,333) | | $ | 108,919,523 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 396,907 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 109,316,430 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 277,276 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 45,038 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 41 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 82,749 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 405,104 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 108,911,326 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 233,936,030 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (140,178,404 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 1,610,510 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolio | | | 13,543,190 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 108,911,326 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 76,284,262 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 8,868,663 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.60 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 9.12 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 5,774,925 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 700,408 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.25 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 25,598,900 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 3,139,922 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.15 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 1,253,239 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 145,686 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.60 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends allocated from Portfolio (net of foreign taxes, $390,310) | | $ | 3,541,642 | | | |
Interest allocated from Portfolio | | | 20,260 | | | |
Miscellaneous income | | | 22,290 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (1,178,313 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 2,405,879 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 184,336 | | | |
Class B | | | 67,492 | | | |
Class C | | | 243,830 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 499 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 25,500 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 214,040 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 20,209 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 47,386 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 64,244 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 10,495 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 878,031 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 1,527,848 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (37,942,120 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | (157,462 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (38,099,582 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 48,844,304 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 41,745 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 48,886,049 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 10,786,467 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 12,314,315 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 1,527,848 | | | $ | 2,951,363 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (38,099,582 | ) | | | (13,527,367 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 48,886,049 | | | | (118,220,525 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 12,314,315 | | | $ | (128,796,529 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (1,462,834 | ) | | $ | (1,638,403 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (142,946 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (147,336 | ) | | | (386,213 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (8,498 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (1,618,668 | ) | | $ | (2,167,562 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 19,378,245 | | | $ | 88,104,539 | | | |
Class B | | | 254,281 | | | | 2,799,005 | | | |
Class C | | | 3,997,793 | | | | 19,258,675 | | | |
Class I | | | 1,068,049 | | | | 101,000 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 1,186,409 | | | | 1,230,841 | | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | 122,626 | | | |
Class C | | | 116,488 | | | | 289,863 | | | |
Class I | | | 2,143 | | | | — | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (46,310,751 | ) | | | (42,415,388 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (2,232,289 | ) | | | (5,061,456 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (10,656,508 | ) | | | (12,433,464 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (25,107 | ) | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 2,444,150 | | | | 7,815,265 | | | |
Class B | | | (2,444,150 | ) | | | (7,815,265 | ) | | |
Redemption fees | | | 1,736 | | | | 20,656 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (33,219,511 | ) | | $ | 52,016,897 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (22,523,864 | ) | | $ | (78,947,194 | ) | | |
|
|
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 131,435,190 | | | $ | 210,382,384 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 108,911,326 | | | $ | 131,435,190 | | | |
|
|
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 1,610,510 | | | $ | 1,866,358 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 7.530 | | | $ | 14.970 | | | $ | 11.080 | | | $ | 8.670 | | | $ | 7.080 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.121 | | | $ | 0.205 | | | $ | 0.266 | (2) | | $ | 0.082 | | | $ | 0.056 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.078 | | | | (7.470 | ) | | | 3.731 | | | | 2.403 | | | | 1.534 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.199 | | | $ | (7.265 | ) | | $ | 3.997 | | | $ | 2.485 | | | $ | 1.590 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.129 | ) | | $ | (0.176 | ) | | $ | (0.107 | ) | | $ | (0.075 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.129 | ) | | $ | (0.176 | ) | | $ | (0.107 | ) | | $ | (0.075 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.600 | | | $ | 7.530 | | | $ | 14.970 | | | $ | 11.080 | | | $ | 8.670 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 16.22 | % | | | (49.06 | )% | | | 36.35 | % | | | 28.85 | % | | | 22.46 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 76,284 | | | $ | 92,173 | | | $ | 125,311 | | | $ | 59,486 | | | $ | 29,634 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 1.73 | %(7) | | | 1.54 | % | | | 1.57 | % | | | 1.67 | % | | | 1.89 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.67 | % | | | 1.67 | % | | | 2.12 | %(2) | | | 0.81 | % | | | 0.70 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 57 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 25 | % | | | 39 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment income per share reflects a dividend resulting from a corporate action allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.132 per share. Excluding this dividend, the ratio of net investment income to average daily net assets would have been 1.07%. |
|
(3) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | The investment adviser of the Portfolio waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2009). All of the waiver was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 7.140 | | | $ | 14.200 | | | $ | 10.510 | | | $ | 8.230 | | | $ | 6.770 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income (loss)(1) | | $ | 0.066 | | | $ | 0.098 | | | $ | 0.132 | (2) | | $ | 0.008 | | | $ | (0.004 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.044 | | | | (7.094 | ) | | | 3.573 | | | | 2.281 | | | | 1.464 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.110 | | | $ | (6.996 | ) | | $ | 3.705 | | | $ | 2.289 | | | $ | 1.460 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.065 | ) | | $ | (0.015 | ) | | $ | (0.009 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.065 | ) | | $ | (0.015 | ) | | $ | (0.009 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.250 | | | $ | 7.140 | | | $ | 14.200 | | | $ | 10.510 | | | $ | 8.230 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 15.41 | % | | | (49.47 | )% | | | 35.29 | % | | | 27.83 | % | | | 21.56 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 5,775 | | | $ | 9,717 | | | $ | 31,892 | | | $ | 29,214 | | | $ | 27,861 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 2.49 | %(7) | | | 2.29 | % | | | 2.32 | % | | | 2.42 | % | | | 2.64 | % | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 0.95 | % | | | 0.82 | % | | | 1.12 | %(2) | | | 0.08 | % | | | (0.05 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 57 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 25 | % | | | 39 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment income per share reflects a dividend resulting from a corporate action allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.097 per share. Excluding this dividend, the ratio of net investment income to average daily net assets would have been 0.29%. |
|
(3) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | The investment adviser of the Portfolio waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2009). All of the waiver was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 7.100 | | | $ | 14.150 | | | $ | 10.500 | | | $ | 8.220 | | | $ | 6.760 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income (loss)(1) | | $ | 0.063 | | | $ | 0.105 | | | $ | 0.156 | (2) | | $ | 0.009 | | | $ | (0.004 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.024 | | | | (7.060 | ) | | | 3.536 | | | | 2.287 | | | | 1.464 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.087 | | | $ | (6.955 | ) | | $ | 3.692 | | | $ | 2.296 | | | $ | 1.460 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.037 | ) | | $ | (0.096 | ) | | $ | (0.042 | ) | | $ | (0.016 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.037 | ) | | $ | (0.096 | ) | | $ | (0.042 | ) | | $ | (0.016 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(1) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 8.150 | | | $ | 7.100 | | | $ | 14.150 | | | $ | 10.500 | | | $ | 8.220 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 15.40 | % | | | (49.46 | )% | | | 35.27 | % | | | 27.96 | % | | | 21.60 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 25,599 | | | $ | 29,444 | | | $ | 53,180 | | | $ | 28,225 | | | $ | 18,647 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 2.48 | %(7) | | | 2.29 | % | | | 2.32 | % | | | 2.42 | % | | | 2.64 | % | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 0.91 | % | | | 0.90 | % | | | 1.32 | %(2) | | | 0.09 | % | | | (0.06 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 57 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 25 | % | | | 39 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment income per share reflects a dividend resulting from a corporate action allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.119 per share. Excluding this dividend, the ratio of net investment income to average daily net assets would have been 0.31%. |
|
(3) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | The investment adviser of the Portfolio waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2009). All of the waiver was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.530 | | | $ | 11.490 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.157 | | | $ | 0.003 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.072 | | | | (3.963 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.229 | | | $ | (3.960 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.159 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.159 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(2) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.600 | | | $ | 7.530 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 16.69 | % | | | (34.46 | )%(9) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 1,253 | | | $ | 101 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 1.48 | %(7) | | | 1.23 | %(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.11 | % | | | 0.25 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 57 | % | | | 34 | %(10) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, September 2, 2008, to October 31, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | The investment adviser of the Portfolio waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2009). All of the waiver was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
|
(9) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2008. |
|
(10) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income and losses, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (56.3% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio and other income, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $138,466,695 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2010 ($49,131,487), October 31, 2011 ($39,935,051), October 31, 2016 ($12,569,600) and October 31, 2017 ($36,830,557).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
12
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Redemption Fees — Upon the redemption or exchange of shares by Class A and Class I shareholders within 90 days of the settlement of purchase, a fee of 1% of the current net asset value of these shares will be assessed and retained by the Fund for the benefit of the remaining shareholders. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in capital.
I Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make at least one distribution annually (normally in December) of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 1,618,668 | | | $ | 2,167,562 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $16,209,078, accumulated undistributed net investment income was decreased by $165,028, and paid-capital was decreased by $16,044,050 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency loss and expired capital loss carryforwards. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 1,610,510 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (138,466,695 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 11,831,481 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales and partnership allocations.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
Eaton Vance Management (EVM) serves as the administrator to the Fund, but receives no compensation. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $12,251 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $5,683 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of
13
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $184,336 for Class A shares. The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 5% and 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, respectively, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $50,619 and $182,872 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $4,097,000 and $10,087,000 respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $16,873 and $60,958 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $4,000, $19,000 and $9,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $19,285,871 and $55,449,499, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 2,687,830 | | | | 6,958,032 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 160,978 | | | | 88,677 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (6,577,758 | ) | | | (3,807,459 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 353,303 | | | | 632,372 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (3,375,647 | ) | | | 3,871,622 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 36,402 | | | | 222,383 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 9,248 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (327,623 | ) | | | (452,290 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (368,486 | ) | | | (664,400 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (659,707 | ) | | | (885,059 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
14
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 596,400 | | | | 1,596,250 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 16,594 | | | | 22,009 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (1,620,856 | ) | | | (1,229,102 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (1,007,862 | ) | | | 389,157 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
Class I | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 135,553 | | | | 13,403 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 292 | | | | — | | | |
Redemptions | | | (3,562 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 132,283 | | | | 13,403 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, September 2, 2008, to October 31, 2008. |
For the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the Fund received $1,736 and $20,656, respectively, in redemption fees.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 16, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
15
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust
and the Shareholders of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed
International Equity Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 16, 2009
16
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of qualified dividend income for individuals and the foreign tax credit.
Qualified Dividend Income. The Fund designates $3,788,439 or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
Foreign Tax Credit. The Fund designates a foreign tax credit of $390,310 and recognizes foreign source income of $3,931,952.
17
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 99.3% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Automobiles — 2.8% |
|
Fiat SpA(1) | | | 62,000 | | | $ | 923,041 | | | |
Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | | | 73,000 | | | | 2,254,726 | | | |
Toyota Motor Corp. | | | 55,500 | | | | 2,190,970 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,368,737 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverages — 3.4% |
|
Central European Distribution Corp.(1) | | | 83,800 | | | $ | 2,607,018 | | | |
Fomento Economico Mexicano SA de CV ADR | | | 90,300 | | | | 3,910,893 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,517,911 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building Products — 1.3% |
|
Wienerberger AG(1) | | | 142,800 | | | $ | 2,579,630 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,579,630 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets — 0.4% |
|
3i Group PLC | | | 195,000 | | | $ | 839,310 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 839,310 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 1.4% |
|
Agrium, Inc. | | | 56,640 | | | $ | 2,659,248 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,659,248 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 19.6% |
|
Banco Santander Central Hispano SA | | | 510,000 | | | $ | 8,207,060 | | | |
Barclays PLC(1) | | | 777,000 | | | | 4,072,306 | | | |
BOC Hong Kong Holdings, Ltd. | | | 1,829,000 | | | | 4,200,911 | | | |
Credit Agricole SA | | | 55,500 | | | | 1,063,112 | | | |
DBS Group Holdings, Ltd. | | | 543,000 | | | | 4,972,561 | | | |
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA(1) | | | 917,000 | | | | 3,859,179 | | | |
KBC Groep NV(1) | | | 73,900 | | | | 3,163,429 | | | |
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | | | 294,000 | | | | 1,565,962 | | | |
National Bank of Greece SA(1) | | | 112,200 | | | | 4,102,073 | | | |
Societe Generale | | | 29,300 | | | | 1,946,102 | | | |
Turkiye Is Bankasi | | | 234,000 | | | | 886,234 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 38,038,929 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals — 0.7% |
|
Toshiba Corp.(1) | | | 240,000 | | | $ | 1,371,683 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,371,683 | | | |
|
|
|
Construction & Engineering — 0.8% |
|
Vinci SA | | | 29,000 | | | $ | 1,513,454 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,513,454 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance — 0.9% |
|
ORIX Corp. | | | 28,000 | | | $ | 1,808,654 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,808,654 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 5.2% |
|
France Telecom SA ADR | | | 130,200 | | | $ | 3,283,644 | | | |
Koninklijke KPN NV | | | 127,200 | | | | 2,307,247 | | | |
Telefonica SA | | | 157,100 | | | | 4,387,255 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,978,146 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 1.2% |
|
E.ON AG | | | 58,020 | | | $ | 2,223,612 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,223,612 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment — 1.3% |
|
ABB, Ltd. ADR | | | 130,900 | | | $ | 2,425,577 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,425,577 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components — 2.5% |
|
FUJIFILM Holdings Corp. | | | 99,000 | | | $ | 2,814,498 | | | |
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. | | | 529,000 | | | | 2,072,002 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,886,500 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services — 1.5% |
|
OAO TMK GDR | | | 105,019 | | | $ | 1,897,156 | | | |
Tenaris SA ADR | | | 28,300 | | | | 1,008,046 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,905,202 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 6.0% |
|
Cosan, Ltd., Class A(1) | | | 181,100 | | | $ | 1,206,126 | | | |
Nestle SA | | | 138,600 | | | | 6,445,116 | | | |
Unilever PLC | | | 133,000 | | | | 3,973,473 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,624,715 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 0.5% |
|
Mindray Medical International, Ltd. ADR | | | 30,400 | | | $ | 934,192 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 934,192 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements18
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 1.0% |
|
Carnival PLC | | | 33,200 | | | $ | 1,029,242 | | | |
Melco Crown Entertainment, Ltd. ADR(1) | | | 176,000 | | | | 872,960 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,902,202 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Durables — 1.6% |
|
Desarrolladora Homex SA de CV ADR(1) | | | 57,200 | | | $ | 2,034,032 | | | |
Fisher & Paykel Appliances Holdings, Ltd. | | | 141,879 | | | | 67,191 | | | |
LG Electronics, Inc. | | | 11,000 | | | | 1,022,565 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,123,788 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Conglomerates — 3.3% |
|
Cookson Group PLC(1) | | | 382,000 | | | $ | 2,279,455 | | | |
Keppel Corp., Ltd. | | | 714,700 | | | | 4,107,444 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,386,899 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 5.2% |
|
Aegon NV(1) | | | 439,800 | | | $ | 3,125,852 | | | |
Aviva PLC | | | 156,700 | | | | 979,868 | | | |
AXA SA | | | 143,900 | | | | 3,578,821 | | | |
Zurich Financial Services AG | | | 10,300 | | | | 2,358,622 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 10,043,163 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Media — 0.9% |
|
Central European Media Enterprises, Ltd., Class A(1) | | | 72,900 | | | $ | 1,832,706 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,832,706 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 7.4% |
|
Anglo American PLC ADR(1) | | | 117,400 | | | $ | 2,124,940 | | | |
ArcelorMittal | | | 51,200 | | | | 1,741,824 | | | |
Rio Tinto PLC ADR | | | 12,000 | | | | 2,136,360 | | | |
Sterlite Industries India, Ltd. ADR | | | 224,700 | | | | 3,543,519 | | | |
Thompson Creek Metals Co., Inc.(1) | | | 167,000 | | | | 1,700,060 | | | |
Vale SA ADR | | | 130,900 | | | | 3,023,790 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,270,493 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multi-Utilities — 3.1% |
|
National Grid PLC | | | 224,000 | | | $ | 2,218,910 | | | |
RWE AG | | | 43,000 | | | | 3,771,653 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,990,563 | | | |
|
|
|
Multiline Retail — 0.5% |
|
Marks & Spencer Group PLC | | | 165,000 | | | $ | 924,139 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 924,139 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Office Electronics — 1.0% |
|
Canon, Inc. | | | 52,000 | | | $ | 1,960,547 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,960,547 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 9.0% |
|
KazMunaiGas Exploration Production GDR | | | 47,300 | | | $ | 1,115,691 | | | |
LUKOIL OAO ADR | | | 54,500 | | | | 3,182,800 | | | |
OMV AG | | | 23,800 | | | | 980,771 | | | |
Petroleo Brasileiro SA ADR | | | 119,300 | | | | 4,786,316 | | | |
StatoilHydro ASA | | | 45,000 | | | | 1,060,388 | | | |
Total SA | | | 105,000 | | | | 6,283,232 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 17,409,198 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals — 6.8% |
|
AstraZeneca PLC ADR | | | 34,900 | | | $ | 1,567,359 | | | |
GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR | | | 84,700 | | | | 3,486,252 | | | |
Novartis AG | | | 117,200 | | | | 6,103,091 | | | |
Sanofi-Aventis | | | 28,100 | | | | 2,059,793 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,216,495 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Road & Rail — 0.6% |
|
All America Latina Logistica SA (Units) | | | 165,000 | | | $ | 1,216,706 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,216,706 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 0.5% |
|
United Microelectronics Corp. ADR(1) | | | 287,000 | | | $ | 944,230 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 944,230 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail — 0.5% |
|
Kingfisher PLC | | | 270,000 | | | $ | 986,878 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 986,878 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Tobacco — 2.9% |
|
British American Tobacco PLC | | | 176,000 | | | $ | 5,608,405 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,608,405 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements19
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Trading Companies & Distributors — 2.7% |
|
Mitsui & Co., Ltd. | | | 396,000 | | | $ | 5,200,644 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,200,644 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 2.8% |
|
MTN Group, Ltd. | | | 102,000 | | | $ | 1,518,702 | | | |
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS ADR | | | 240,000 | | | | 3,943,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,461,902 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $160,802,139) | | $ | 192,154,458 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 0.1% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(2) | | $ | 212 | | | $ | 212,475 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $212,475) | | $ | 212,475 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 99.4% | | |
(identified cost $161,014,614) | | $ | 192,366,933 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.6% | | $ | 1,240,937 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 193,607,870 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
ADR - American Depositary Receipt
GDR - Global Depositary Receipt
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(2) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Country Concentration of Portfolio |
|
| | Percentage
| | | | | | |
Country | | of Net Assets | | | Value | | | |
|
|
United Kingdom | | | 16.7 | % | | $ | 32,226,897 | | | |
France | | | 10.2 | | | | 19,728,158 | | | |
Japan | | | 9.9 | | | | 19,167,684 | | | |
Switzerland | | | 9.0 | | | | 17,332,406 | | | |
Spain | | | 6.5 | | | | 12,594,315 | | | |
Brazil | | | 5.3 | | | | 10,232,938 | | | |
Singapore | | | 4.7 | | | | 9,080,005 | | | |
Netherlands | | | 3.7 | | | | 7,174,923 | | | |
Germany | | | 3.1 | | | | 5,995,265 | | | |
Mexico | | | 3.1 | | | | 5,944,925 | | | |
Italy | | | 3.0 | | | | 5,790,266 | | | |
Russia | | | 2.6 | | | | 5,079,956 | | | |
Hong Kong | | | 2.6 | | | | 5,073,871 | | | |
Turkey | | | 2.5 | | | | 4,829,434 | | | |
Canada | | | 2.3 | | | | 4,359,308 | | | |
Greece | | | 2.1 | | | | 4,102,073 | | | |
Austria | | | 1.8 | | | | 3,560,401 | | | |
India | | | 1.8 | | | | 3,543,519 | | | |
Belgium | | | 1.7 | | | | 3,163,429 | | | |
Taiwan | | | 1.6 | | | | 3,016,232 | | | |
Poland | | | 1.3 | | | | 2,607,018 | | | |
Czech Republic | | | 0.9 | | | | 1,832,706 | | | |
South Africa | | | 0.8 | | | | 1,518,702 | | | |
Kazakhstan | | | 0.6 | | | | 1,115,691 | | | |
Norway | | | 0.5 | | | | 1,060,388 | | | |
South Korea | | | 0.5 | | | | 1,022,565 | | | |
China | | | 0.5 | | | | 934,192 | | | |
United States | | | 0.1 | | | | 212,475 | | | |
New Zealand | | | 0.0 | | | | 67,191 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | | 99.4 | % | | $ | 192,366,933 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements20
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $160,802,139) | | $ | 192,154,458 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $212,475) | | | 212,475 | | | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $8,236) | | | 8,203 | | | |
Dividends receivable | | | 284,231 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 804,387 | | | |
Tax reclaims receivable | | | 638,110 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 194,101,864 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 227,695 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 173,881 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 647 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 91,771 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 493,994 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 193,607,870 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 162,194,771 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 31,413,099 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 193,607,870 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends (net of foreign taxes, $717,072) | | $ | 6,469,279 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 35,546 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (14,049 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 6,490,776 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 1,898,119 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 8,790 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 159,561 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 36,004 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 9,352 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 2,111,826 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Waiver of investment adviser fee | | $ | 310 | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | | 3 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 313 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 2,111,513 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 4,379,263 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (56,733,009 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | (282,463 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (57,015,472 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 77,821,526 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 76,171 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 77,897,697 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 20,882,225 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 25,261,488 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements21
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| �� | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 4,379,263 | | | $ | 7,564,683 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (57,015,472 | ) | | | (18,002,627 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 77,897,697 | | | | (205,817,811 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 25,261,488 | | | $ | (216,255,755 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 22,585,063 | | | $ | 112,879,082 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (81,218,538 | ) | | | (61,316,483 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | (58,633,475 | ) | | $ | 51,562,599 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (33,371,987 | ) | | $ | (164,693,156 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 226,979,857 | | | $ | 391,673,013 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 193,607,870 | | | $ | 226,979,857 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements22
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1) | | | 1.12 | %(2) | | | 1.09 | % | | | 1.10 | % | | | 1.12 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.30 | % | | | 2.08 | % | | | 2.51 | %(3) | | | 1.38 | % | | | 1.42 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 57 | % | | | 34 | % | | | 23 | % | | | 25 | % | | | 39 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 16.92 | % | | | (48.82 | )% | | | 36.97 | % | | | 29.54 | % | | | 23.36 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 193,608 | | | $ | 226,980 | | | $ | 391,673 | | | $ | 228,277 | | | $ | 151,601 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(2) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2009). All of the waiver was borne by the sub-adviser. |
|
(3) | | Includes a dividend resulting from a corporate action equal to 0.96% of average daily net assets. |
See notes to financial statements23
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to achieve long-term after-tax returns by investing in a diversified portfolio of foreign equity securities. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund held an interest of 56.3% and 43.6%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities based on available market quotations provided by a third party pricing service.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
24
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. However, if the ex-dividend date has passed, certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as the Portfolio is informed of the ex-dividend date. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends and capital gains have been provided for in accordance with the Portfolio’s understanding of the applicable countries’ tax rules and rates. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 1.00% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. Pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement, BMR pays Eagle Global Advisors, L.L.C. (Eagle) a portion of its adviser fee for sub-advisory services provided to the Portfolio. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $1,911,530 of which $13,411 was allocated from Cash Management and $1,898,119 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 1.00% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets. BMR has also
25
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
agreed to reduce the investment adviser fee by an amount equal to that portion of commissions paid to broker-dealers in execution of security transactions attributed to the Portfolio that is consideration for third-party research services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, BMR waived $310 of its adviser fee. Eagle, in turn, waived $310 of its sub-advisory fee.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $106,281,328 and $148,659,116, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 161,449,158 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 37,346,147 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (6,428,372 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 30,917,775 | | | |
|
|
The net unrealized appreciation on foreign currency at October 31, 2009 on federal income tax basis was $60,780.
5 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450��million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
6 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by companies whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Portfolio, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign securities markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
7 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
26
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Priced in
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | |
| | | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | |
| |
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer Discretionary | | $ | 4,739,698 | | | $ | 9,398,753 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 14,138,451 | |
Consumer Staples | | | 7,724,037 | | | | 16,026,994 | | | | — | | | | 23,751,031 | |
Energy | | | 11,990,009 | | | | 8,324,391 | | | | — | | | | 20,314,400 | |
Financials | | | — | | | | 50,730,057 | | | | — | | | | 50,730,057 | |
Health Care | | | 5,987,803 | | | | 8,162,883 | | | | — | | | | 14,150,686 | |
Industrials | | | 2,425,577 | | | | 16,897,333 | | | | — | | | | 19,322,910 | |
Information Technology | | | 944,230 | | | | 8,218,730 | | | | — | | | | 9,162,960 | |
Materials | | | 16,929,741 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 16,929,741 | |
Telecommunication Services | | | 7,226,844 | | | | 8,213,204 | | | | — | | | | 15,440,048 | |
Utilities | | | — | | | | 8,214,174 | | | | — | | | | 8,214,174 | |
|
|
Total Common Stocks | | $ | 57,967,939 | | | $ | 134,186,519 | * | | $ | — | | | $ | 192,154,458 | |
|
|
Short-Term Investments | | $ | 212,475 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 212,475 | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 58,180,414 | | | $ | 134,186,519 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 192,366,933 | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Includes foreign equity securities whose values were adjusted to reflect market trading that occurred after the close of trading in their applicable foreign markets. |
The Portfolio held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 16, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
27
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 16, 2009
28
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
29
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio, the portfolio in which Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund (the “Fund”) invests, with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), and the sub-advisory agreement with Eagle Global Advisors, L.L.C. (“Eagle” or the “Sub-adviser”) including the fee structure of each agreement, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the respective agreements. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreements. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement and the sub-advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser and the Sub-adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s and the Sub-adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio and whose responsibilities include supervising the Sub-adviser. The Board specifically noted the Adviser’s in-house equity research capabilities. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management. With respect to the Sub-adviser, the Board took into consideration the resources available to the Sub-adviser in fulfilling its duties under the sub-advisory agreement and the Sub-adviser’s experience in managing international equity portfolios.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof, and of the Sub-adviser. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
30
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser and Sub-adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement, respectively.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and the Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund, to the Portfolio and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund. The Board also concluded that, in light of its role as a sub-adviser not affiliated with the Adviser, the Sub-adviser’s profitability in managing the Portfolio was not a material factor.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
31
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Eagle” refers to Eagle Global Advisors, L.L.C., “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., and “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
32
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Since 1998 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Edward R. Allen, III 7/5/60 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2004 | | Senior Partner of Eagle. Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas N. Hunt, III 11/6/64 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2004 | | Senior Partner at Eagle. Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Vice President of the Trust since 2001 and President of the Portfolio since 2002 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
33
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
34
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Tax-Managed International Equity Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Sub-Adviser of Tax-Managed International Equity PortfolioEagle Global Advisors, L.L.C.
5847 San Felipe, Suite 930
Houston, TX 77057
Administrator of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity FundEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Annual Report October 31, 2009 EATON VANCE TAX-MANAGED MID-CAP CORE FUND |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
• | | Although global equity markets began the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, on a downward trajectory, stocks bounced strongly off the bottom set in early March and staged a broad-based rally that continued through the end of the 12-month period. Last fall, on the verge of a possible collapse of the global financial system, risk-averse investors reacted by streaming to the sidelines, sending stocks into a dramatic decline. By late winter, however, fiscal and monetary interventions by governments around the world began to fuel optimism that the financial crisis would end and global economic growth might resume. |
William O. Bell IV, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | Amid prospects for a better-than-expected 2009, investor risk appetite began to return, overcoming such lingering concerns as high consumer debt levels, rising unemployment and still-depressed home prices. Corporate profits also started showing improvement, benefiting from cost-cutting and easier earnings comparisons, which further supported the equity market’s rebound. Stocks that declined the most last fall, especially those lower-quality, cyclical issues farther out on the risk spectrum, tended to be those that recovered most quickly as the rally gained steam. |
William R. Hackney, III, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | From March through September 2009, the broad-based S&P 500 Index posted strong gains, with only a slight pull back in October ending a string of consecutive monthly gains. For the full one-year period that ended October 31, 2009, the S&P 500 posted a 9.80% return, while the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 7.76% and the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index soared 18.84%. The large-cap Russell 1000 Index returned 11.20%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index gained 6.46%. In terms of investment styles, growth stocks widely outperformed their counterparts in the value space.1 |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Management Discussion
• | | For the year ending October 31, 2009, each of the 10 sectors in the S&P MidCap 400 Index (the Index) registered positive absolute returns. The information technology sector posted the strongest gains, reflecting the strong balance sheets of many IT companies and the fact that the sector was an early beneficiary of an economic recovery. The consumer discretionary sector also performed well, as consumer confidence gradually improved. The financials sector was the worst-performing sector, the only one not posting a double-digit increase for the year. |
• | | The Fund2 posted positive returns for the year, although it underperformed both the Index and its Lipper peer group. The Fund’s holdings in the consumer discretionary sector detracted the most from relative returns. Although the sector performed well for the Index, stock selection in the hotels, restaurants and leisure group and diversified consumer services underperformed comparable holdings in the Index. In addition, the Fund held no stocks in |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08 - 10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A3 | | | 17.15 | % |
Class B3 | | | 16.42 | |
Class C3 | | | 16.44 | |
S&P MidCap 400 Index1 | | | 18.18 | |
Lipper Mid-Cap Core Funds Average1 | | | 17.52 | |
See pages 3 and 4 for more performance information, including after-tax returns.
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
2 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio, with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Absent an allocation of certain expenses to the administrator of the Fund and the sub-adviser of the Portfolio, the returns would be lower. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
1
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
| | the internet and catalog retailing industry, the best-performing component of the consumer discretionary sector. In the industrials sector, Fund selection in machinery stocks, as well as construction & engineering restrained relative performance. |
• | | On the positive side, the energy sector provided the greatest boost to Fund performance, with both an overweighted allocation and individual stocks contributing to returns. Financial stocks also made a significant contribution to returns, particularly Fund holdings in capital markets. The Fund’s selectivity in electric and gas utilities stocks made further contributions. |
• | | As of October 31, 2009, the Fund’s holdings were broadly diversified across nine of the 10 economic sectors of the Index. (The Fund had no exposure to the telecommunication services sector, which represented less than 1% of the market capitalization of the Index.) In making investment decisions, the portfolio managers use a combination of growth and value disciplines, emphasizing seasoned, higher-quality companies whose stocks are considered to trade at attractive valuations relative to earnings or cash flow per share. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
| | | | |
Top 10 Holdings1 | | | | |
|
By net assets | | | | |
| | | | |
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc. | | | 2.9 | % |
IDEX Corp. | | | 2.5 | |
ANSYS, Inc. | | | 2.4 | |
National Fuel Gas Co. | | | 2.3 | |
AMETEK, Inc. | | | 2.3 | |
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc. | | | 2.2 | |
Health Care REIT, Inc. | | | 2.2 | |
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. | | | 2.1 | |
Newfield Exploration Co. | | | 2.1 | |
DENTSPLY International, Inc. | | | 2.1 | |
| | |
1 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 23.1% of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
Sector Weightings2
By net assets
| | |
2 | | As a percentage of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
2
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the S&P MidCap 400 Index, a broad-based, unmanaged index commonly used as a measure of U.S. mid-cap stock performance. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A and the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
Performance1
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | | EXMCX | | EBMCX | | ECMCX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 17.15 | % | | | 16.42 | % | | | 16.44 | % |
Five Years | | | 3.20 | | | | 2.46 | | | | 2.44 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.68 | | | | 2.93 | | | | 2.92 | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
One Year | | | 10.47 | % | | | 11.42 | % | | | 15.44 | % |
Five Years | | | 1.98 | | | | 2.10 | | | | 2.44 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 2.88 | | | | 2.93 | | | | 2.92 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates — Class A, Class B, and Class C: 3/4/02 |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class B shares reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Absent an allocation of certain expenses to the administrator of the Fund and the sub-adviser of the Portfolio, the returns would be lower. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
Gross Expense Ratio | | | 1.66 | % | | | 2.41 | % | | | 2.41 | % |
Net Expense Ratio | | | 1.60 | | | | 2.35 | | | | 2.35 | |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. Net expense ratio reflects a contractual expense reimbursement that continues through April 30, 2010. Thereafter, the expense reimbursement may be changed or terminated at any time. Without this reimbursement, expenses would be higher. |
|
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 3/4/02. Index returns are available only as of month end. |
|
| | A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class B shares and Class C shares on 3/4/02 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $12,477 and $12,466, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
“Return Before Taxes” does not take into consideration shareholder taxes. It is most relevant to tax-free or tax-deferred shareholder accounts. “Return After Taxes on Distributions” reflects the impact of federal income taxes due on Fund distributions of dividends and capital gains. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who continue to hold their shares. “Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares” also reflects the impact of taxes on capital gain or loss realized upon a sale of shares. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who sell their shares.
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 17.15 | % | | | 3.20 | % | | | 3.68 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 17.15 | | | | 2.82 | | | | 3.43 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 11.15 | | | | 2.80 | | | | 3.22 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 10.47 | % | | | 1.98 | % | | | 2.88 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 10.47 | | | | 1.60 | | | | 2.63 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 6.80 | | | | 1.75 | | | | 2.52 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 16.44 | % | | | 2.44 | % | | | 2.92 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 16.44 | | | | 2.04 | | | | 2.66 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 10.68 | | | | 2.15 | | | | 2.55 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 15.44 | % | | | 2.44 | % | | | 2.92 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 15.44 | | | | 2.04 | | | | 2.66 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 10.03 | | | | 2.15 | | | | 2.55 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 16.42 | % | | | 2.46 | % | | | 2.93 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 16.42 | | | | 2.06 | | | | 2.67 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 10.67 | | | | 2.16 | | | | 2.56 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 11.42 | % | | | 2.10 | % | | | 2.93 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 11.42 | | | | 1.69 | | | | 2.67 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 7.42 | | | | 1.85 | | | | 2.56 | |
Class A, Class B and Class C of the Fund commenced investment operations on 3/4/02. Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) reflect the deduction of the maximum initial sales charge and applicable CDSC, while Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) do not. Absent an allocation of certain expenses to the administrator of the Fund and the sub-adviser of the Portfolio, the returns would be lower.
After-tax returns are calculated using certain assumptions. After-tax returns are calculated using the highest historical individual federal income tax rates and do not reflect the impact of state and local taxes. Actual after-tax returns depend on a shareholder’s tax situation and the actual characterization of distributions and may differ from those shown. After-tax returns are not relevant to shareholders who hold shares in tax-deferred accounts or to shares held by non-taxable entities. Return After Taxes on Distributions for a period may be the same as Return Before Taxes for the same period because no taxable distributions were made during that period, or because the taxable portion of distributions made during the period was insignificant. Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares for a period may be greater than or equal to Return After Taxes on Distributions for the same period because of losses realized on the sale of Fund shares.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
4
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,151.80 | | | | $8.68 | ** | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,148.30 | | | | $12.72 | ** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,148.40 | | | | $12.73 | ** | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.10 | | | | $8.13 | ** | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,013.40 | | | | $11.93 | ** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,013.40 | | | | $11.93 | ** | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.60% for Class A shares, 2.35% for Class B shares and 2.35% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
|
| ** | Absent an allocation of certain expenses to affiliates, the expenses would be higher. | |
5
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $29,801,574) | | $ | 34,206,807 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 291,005 | | | |
Receivable from affiliates | | | 12,115 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 34,509,927 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 11,375 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Administration fee | | | 4,505 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 13,930 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 37,014 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 66,866 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 34,443,061 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 31,717,986 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (1,639,604 | ) | | |
Accumulated net investment loss | | | (40,554 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolio | | | 4,405,233 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 34,443,061 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 24,812,508 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 2,136,275 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 11.61 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 12.32 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 3,102,215 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 284,198 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 10.92 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 6,528,338 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 598,609 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 10.91 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends allocated from Portfolio | | $ | 403,753 | | | |
Interest allocated from Portfolio | | | 65 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (249,031 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 154,787 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Administration fee | | $ | 40,377 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 46,061 | | | |
Class B | | | 29,207 | | | |
Class C | | | 55,798 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 12,806 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 46,446 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 16,946 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 21,092 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 46,739 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 10,999 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 326,971 | | | |
|
|
Deduct – | | | | | | |
Allocation of expenses to affiliates | | $ | 81,072 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 81,072 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 245,899 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | $ | (91,112 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) – | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (948,549 | ) | | |
Capital gain distributions received | | | 38,427 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (910,122 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 5,278,128 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 5,278,128 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 4,368,006 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 4,276,894 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations – | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | $ | (91,112 | ) | | $ | (182,183 | ) | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions and capital gain distributions received | | | (910,122 | ) | | | (712,147 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments | | | 5,278,128 | | | | (10,849,356 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 4,276,894 | | | $ | (11,743,686 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders – | | | | | | | | | | |
From net realized gain | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,631,947 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (403,944 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (596,306 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | — | | | $ | (2,632,197 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest – | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 11,645,974 | | | $ | 4,078,939 | | | |
Class B | | | 425,147 | | | | 195,836 | | | |
Class C | | | 1,849,222 | | | | 894,312 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | 1,437,508 | | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | 369,556 | | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | 492,053 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (6,358,841 | ) | | | (4,805,013 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (667,020 | ) | | | (856,013 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (1,513,454 | ) | | | (1,736,810 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 354,651 | | | | 276,499 | | | |
Class B | | | (354,651 | ) | | | (276,499 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 5,381,028 | | | $ | 70,368 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 9,657,922 | | | $ | (14,305,515 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 24,785,139 | | | $ | 39,090,654 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 34,443,061 | | | $ | 24,785,139 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated net investment loss included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | (40,554 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value – Beginning of year | | $ | 9.910 | | | $ | 15.400 | | | $ | 13.890 | | | $ | 12.360 | | | $ | 11.270 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(1) | | $ | (0.012 | ) | | $ | (0.035 | ) | | $ | (0.049 | ) | | $ | (0.067 | ) | | $ | (0.108 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.712 | | | | (4.430 | ) | | | 2.299 | | | | 1.663 | | | | 1.198 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.700 | | | $ | (4.465 | ) | | $ | 2.250 | | | $ | 1.596 | | | $ | 1.090 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net realized gain | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.025 | ) | | $ | (0.740 | ) | | $ | (0.066 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.025 | ) | | $ | (0.740 | ) | | $ | (0.066 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value – End of year | | $ | 11.610 | | | $ | 9.910 | | | $ | 15.400 | | | $ | 13.890 | | | $ | 12.360 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 17.15 | % | | | (31.02 | )% | | | 16.93 | % | | | 12.96 | % | | | 9.67 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 24,813 | | | $ | 16,196 | | | $ | 24,406 | | | $ | 17,718 | | | $ | 13,761 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4) | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.60 | % | | | 1.64 | % | | | 1.70 | % | | | 1.70 | % | | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.11 | )% | | | (0.26 | )% | | | (0.34 | )% | | | (0.50 | )% | | | (0.89 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 42 | % | | | 40 | % | | | 38 | % | | | 55 | % | | | 53 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser of the Portfolio waived a portion of its investment adviser fee and the administrator of the Fund subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.31%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.07% and 0.16% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively). A portion of the waiver and subsidy was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. Absent this waiver and subsidy, total return would be lower. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| �� | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value – Beginning of year | | $ | 9.380 | | | $ | 14.740 | | | $ | 13.420 | | | $ | 12.030 | | | $ | 11.050 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(1) | | $ | (0.075 | ) | | $ | (0.127 | ) | | $ | (0.151 | ) | | $ | (0.161 | ) | | $ | (0.194 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.615 | | | | (4.208 | ) | | | 2.211 | | | | 1.617 | | | | 1.174 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.540 | | | $ | (4.335 | ) | | $ | 2.060 | | | $ | 1.456 | | | $ | 0.980 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net realized gain | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.025 | ) | | $ | (0.740 | ) | | $ | (0.066 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.025 | ) | | $ | (0.740 | ) | | $ | (0.066 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value – End of year | | $ | 10.920 | | | $ | 9.380 | | | $ | 14.740 | | | $ | 13.420 | | | $ | 12.030 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 16.42 | % | | | (31.56 | )% | | | 16.07 | % | | | 12.15 | % | | | 8.87 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 3,102 | | | $ | 3,316 | | | $ | 5,950 | | | $ | 6,577 | | | $ | 6,436 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4) | | | 2.35 | % | | | 2.35 | % | | | 2.39 | % | | | 2.45 | % | | | 2.45 | % | | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.80 | )% | | | (1.01 | )% | | | (1.08 | )% | | | (1.25 | )% | | | (1.64 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 42 | % | | | 40 | % | | | 38 | % | | | 55 | % | | | 53 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser of the Portfolio waived a portion of its investment adviser fee and the administrator of the Fund subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.31%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.07% and 0.16% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively). A portion of the waiver and subsidy was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. Absent this waiver and subsidy, total return would be lower. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value – Beginning of year | | $ | 9.370 | | | $ | 14.740 | | | $ | 13.420 | | | $ | 12.030 | | | $ | 11.050 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(1) | | $ | (0.080 | ) | | $ | (0.127 | ) | | $ | (0.151 | ) | | $ | (0.161 | ) | | $ | (0.194 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.620 | | | | (4.218 | ) | | | 2.211 | | | | 1.617 | | | | 1.174 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.540 | | | $ | (4.345 | ) | | $ | 2.060 | | | $ | 1.456 | | | $ | 0.980 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net realized gain | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.025 | ) | | $ | (0.740 | ) | | $ | (0.066 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.025 | ) | | $ | (0.740 | ) | | $ | (0.066 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value – End of year | | $ | 10.910 | | | $ | 9.370 | | | $ | 14.740 | | | $ | 13.420 | | | $ | 12.030 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 16.44 | % | | | (31.63 | )% | | | 16.07 | % | | | 12.15 | % | | | 8.87 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 6,528 | | | $ | 5,273 | | | $ | 8,735 | | | $ | 7,051 | | | $ | 6,027 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4) | | | 2.35 | % | | | 2.35 | % | | | 2.39 | % | | | 2.45 | % | | | 2.45 | % | | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.84 | )% | | | (1.02 | )% | | | (1.08 | )% | | | (1.25 | )% | | | (1.64 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 42 | % | | | 40 | % | | | 38 | % | | | 55 | % | | | 53 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | The investment adviser of the Portfolio waived a portion of its investment adviser fee and the administrator of the Fund subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.31%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.07% and 0.16% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively). A portion of the waiver and subsidy was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. Absent this waiver and subsidy, total return would be lower. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers three classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income and losses, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (49.2% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $1,631,301 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2016 ($702,607) and October 31, 2017 ($928,694).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
11
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make at least one distribution annually (normally in December) of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term capital gains | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,632,197 | | | |
|
|
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $13,700, accumulated net investment loss was decreased by $50,558 and paid-in capital was decreased by $64,258 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for net operating losses and distributions from real estate investment trusts (REITs). These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (1,631,301 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 4,356,376 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, partnership allocations and distributions from REITs.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
The administration fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for administrative services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $40,377. EVM and the sub-adviser of the Portfolio, Atlanta Capital Management Company LLC (Atlanta Capital), have agreed to reimburse the Fund’s operating expenses to the extent that they exceed 1.60% annually of the Fund’s average daily net assets for Class A and 2.35% annually of the Fund’s average daily net assets for Class B and Class C. This agreement may be changed or terminated after April 30, 2010. Pursuant to this agreement, EVM and Atlanta Capital were allocated $25,335 and $55,737, respectively, of the Fund’s operating expenses for the year ended October 31, 2009. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report.
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $2,687 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $7,381 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the
12
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $46,061 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $21,905 and $41,849 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $45,000 and $525,000, respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $7,302 and $13,949 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $600, $3,000 and $500 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $12,472,386 and $7,533,842, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,154,432 | | | | 308,214 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 100,949 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (690,775 | ) | | | (380,664 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 37,557 | | | | 21,690 | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 501,214 | | | | 50,189 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
13
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 45,335 | | | | 16,348 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 27,233 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (74,867 | ) | | | (70,899 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (39,795 | ) | | | (22,824 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (69,327 | ) | | | (50,142 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 201,231 | | | | 74,740 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 36,260 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (165,286 | ) | | | (141,011 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | 35,945 | | | | (30,011 | ) | | |
|
|
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 14, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
14
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 14, 2009
15
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 98.6% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Auto Components — 1.2% |
|
BorgWarner, Inc. | | | 28,000 | | | $ | 848,960 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 848,960 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets — 6.0% |
|
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.(1) | | | 31,400 | | | $ | 1,993,586 | | | |
Greenhill & Co., Inc. | | | 9,000 | | | | 776,070 | | | |
Jefferies Group, Inc.(1) | | | 28,000 | | | | 730,800 | | | |
SEI Investments Co. | | | 40,000 | | | | 698,800 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,199,256 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 0.8% |
|
RPM International, Inc. | | | 31,000 | | | $ | 546,220 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 546,220 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 3.0% |
|
City National Corp. | | | 32,000 | | | $ | 1,205,440 | | | |
TCF Financial Corp. | | | 75,000 | | | | 887,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,092,690 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Communications Equipment — 1.9% |
|
F5 Networks, Inc.(1) | | | 30,000 | | | $ | 1,346,700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,346,700 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals — 1.1% |
|
Diebold, Inc. | | | 25,000 | | | $ | 756,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 756,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Construction & Engineering — 2.1% |
|
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.(1) | | | 35,000 | | | $ | 1,480,150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,480,150 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Construction Materials — 1.1% |
|
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. | | | 9,000 | | | $ | 749,880 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 749,880 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Containers & Packaging — 1.8% |
|
Sonoco Products Co. | | | 46,200 | | | $ | 1,235,850 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,235,850 | | | |
|
|
|
Diversified Consumer Services — 2.1% |
|
Matthews International Corp., Class A | | | 40,000 | | | $ | 1,469,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,469,200 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services — 1.1% |
|
Leucadia National Corp.(1) | | | 35,000 | | | $ | 786,450 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 786,450 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 1.4% |
|
DPL, Inc. | | | 38,300 | | | $ | 970,522 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 970,522 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment — 2.3% |
|
AMETEK, Inc. | | | 45,000 | | | $ | 1,570,050 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,570,050 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components — 4.2% |
|
Amphenol Corp., Class A | | | 25,600 | | | $ | 1,027,072 | | | |
FLIR Systems, Inc.(1) | | | 37,000 | | | | 1,028,970 | | | |
National Instruments Corp. | | | 32,000 | | | | 854,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,910,442 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services — 4.0% |
|
FMC Technologies, Inc.(1) | | | 27,000 | | | $ | 1,420,200 | | | |
Oceaneering International, Inc.(1) | | | 27,000 | | | | 1,379,700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,799,900 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food & Staples Retailing — 1.0% |
|
Ruddick Corp. | | | 26,000 | | | $ | 694,720 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 694,720 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Gas Utilities — 3.1% |
|
AGL Resources, Inc. | | | 16,600 | | | $ | 580,336 | | | |
National Fuel Gas Co. | | | 35,000 | | | | 1,586,900 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,167,236 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 5.6% |
|
Bard (C.R.), Inc. | | | 7,800 | | | $ | 585,546 | | | |
Beckman Coulter, Inc. | | | 8,900 | | | | 572,537 | | | |
See notes to financial statements16
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
DENTSPLY International, Inc. | | | 44,800 | | | $ | 1,476,608 | | | |
Varian Medical Systems, Inc.(1) | | | 30,000 | | | | 1,229,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,864,091 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 1.6% |
|
Henry Schein, Inc.(1) | | | 21,000 | | | $ | 1,109,430 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,109,430 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 1.1% |
|
Sonic Corp.(1) | | | 82,400 | | | $ | 770,440 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 770,440 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Durables — 1.0% |
|
Mohawk Industries, Inc.(1) | | | 16,700 | | | $ | 715,261 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 715,261 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Products — 1.2% |
|
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | | | 14,000 | | | $ | 796,320 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 796,320 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 2.9% |
|
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. | | | 34,000 | | | $ | 897,260 | | | |
Markel Corp.(1) | | | 3,500 | | | | 1,129,450 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,026,710 | | | |
|
|
|
|
IT Services — 1.2% |
|
Fiserv, Inc.(1) | | | 17,800 | | | $ | 816,486 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 816,486 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences Tools & Services — 4.1% |
|
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Class A(1) | | | 14,000 | | | $ | 1,251,460 | | | |
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.(1) | | | 16,000 | | | | 1,560,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,811,460 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Machinery — 7.7% |
|
Bucyrus International, Inc. | | | 10,000 | | | $ | 444,200 | | | |
Donaldson Co., Inc. | | | 40,000 | | | | 1,426,800 | | | |
Graco, Inc. | | | 37,000 | | | | 1,018,980 | | | |
IDEX Corp. | | | 60,000 | | | | 1,705,800 | | | |
Valmont Industries, Inc. | | | 10,000 | | | | 722,700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,318,480 | | | |
|
|
|
Media — 3.0% |
|
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Class A | | | 30,000 | | | $ | 1,056,600 | | | |
Morningstar, Inc.(1) | | | 20,000 | | | | 1,020,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,077,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 2.7% |
|
Cliffs Natural Resources, Inc. | | | 20,000 | | | $ | 711,400 | | | |
Commercial Metals Co. | | | 80,000 | | | | 1,187,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,898,600 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multi-Utilities — 1.8% |
|
OGE Energy Corp. | | | 38,300 | | | $ | 1,272,326 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,272,326 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multiline Retail — 1.0% |
|
Dollar Tree, Inc.(1) | | | 15,000 | | | $ | 676,950 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 676,950 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 3.7% |
|
Arch Coal, Inc. | | | 27,000 | | | $ | 584,820 | | | |
Denbury Resources, Inc.(1) | | | 37,000 | | | | 540,200 | | | |
Newfield Exploration Co.(1) | | | 36,000 | | | | 1,476,720 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,601,740 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Personal Products — 1.2% |
|
Alberto-Culver Co. | | | 30,000 | | | $ | 804,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 804,600 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services — 0.9% |
|
FTI Consulting, Inc.(1) | | | 15,000 | | | $ | 612,150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 612,150 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) — 4.1% |
|
Health Care REIT, Inc. | | | 35,000 | | | $ | 1,552,950 | | | |
Rayonier, Inc. | | | 34,000 | | | | 1,311,720 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,864,670 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Road & Rail — 1.5% |
|
Landstar System, Inc. | | | 30,000 | | | $ | 1,057,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,057,200 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements17
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 1.6% |
|
Microchip Technology, Inc. | | | 46,050 | | | $ | 1,103,358 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,103,358 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Software — 5.3% |
|
ANSYS, Inc.(1) | | | 41,200 | | | $ | 1,671,896 | | | |
Fair Isaac Corp. | | | 37,200 | | | | 756,276 | | | |
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. | | | 55,200 | | | | 1,273,464 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,701,636 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail — 3.9% |
|
GameStop Corp., Class A(1) | | | 45,000 | | | $ | 1,093,050 | | | |
O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.(1) | | | 20,000 | | | | 745,600 | | | |
Ross Stores, Inc. | | | 20,000 | | | | 880,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,718,850 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods — 1.4% |
|
Columbia Sportswear Co. | | | 25,000 | | | $ | 951,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 951,250 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Tobacco — 1.1% |
|
Universal Corp., VA | | | 19,000 | | | $ | 790,210 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 790,210 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Trading Companies & Distributors — 0.8% |
|
Fastenal Co. | | | 17,000 | | | $ | 586,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 586,500 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $58,084,580) | | $ | 68,569,944 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 98.6% | | |
(identified cost $58,084,580) | | $ | 68,569,944 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 1.4% | | $ | 955,629 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 69,525,573 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
See notes to financial statements18
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investments, at value (identified cost, $58,084,580) | | $ | 68,569,944 | | | |
Cash | | | 1,017,730 | | | |
Dividends receivable | | | 31,351 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 69,619,025 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 48,941 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 253 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 44,258 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 93,452 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 69,525,573 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 59,040,209 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 10,485,364 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 69,525,573 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends | | $ | 950,534 | | | |
Interest | | | 181 | | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 950,715 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 495,439 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 3,082 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 43,417 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 29,418 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 4,358 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 575,714 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of investment adviser fee | | $ | 3,804 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 3,804 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 571,910 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 378,805 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (2,413,405 | ) | | |
Capital gain distributions received | | | 90,416 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (2,322,989 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 11,180,220 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 11,180,220 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 8,857,231 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 9,236,036 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements19
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 378,805 | | | $ | 414,388 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions and capital gain distributions received | | | (2,322,989 | ) | | | (1,072,222 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments | | | 11,180,220 | | | | (30,626,771 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 9,236,036 | | | $ | (31,284,605 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 12,472,841 | | | $ | 5,183,135 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (21,598,240 | ) | | | (14,648,201 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | (9,125,399 | ) | | $ | (9,465,066 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 110,637 | | | $ | (40,749,671 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 69,414,936 | | | $ | 110,164,607 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 69,525,573 | | | $ | 69,414,936 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements20
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1) | | | 0.93 | % | | | 0.90 | % | | | 0.90 | % | | | 0.91 | % | | | 0.91 | % | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 0.61 | % | | | 0.44 | % | | | 0.41 | % | | | 0.29 | % | | | (0.11 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 42 | % | | | 40 | % | | | 38 | % | | | 55 | % | | | 53 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 17.93 | % | | | (30.51 | )% | | | 17.79 | % | | | 13.85 | % | | | 10.54 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 69,526 | | | $ | 69,415 | | | $ | 110,165 | | | $ | 97,877 | | | $ | 76,091 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009 and 2008, and less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for each of the years ended October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005). A portion of the waiver was borne by the sub-adviser. Absent this waiver, total return would be lower. |
See notes to financial statements21
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to achieve long-term, after-tax returns by investing in a diversified portfolio of common stocks of mid-cap companies. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund held an interest of 49.2% and 50.8%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee
22
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM), as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.80% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. Pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement, BMR pays Atlanta Capital Management Company, LLC (Atlanta Capital), an affiliate of EVM, a portion of its adviser fee for sub-advisory services provided to the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the investment adviser fee was 0.80% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets and amounted to $495,439. BMR has agreed to reduce the investment adviser fee by an amount equal to that portion of commissions paid to broker-dealers in execution of security transactions attributed to the Portfolio that is consideration for third-party research services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, BMR waived $3,804 of its investment adviser fee. Atlanta Capital, in turn, waived $3,804 of its sub-advisory fee.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $25,547,093 and $34,202,672, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 58,188,262 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 12,121,623 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (1,739,941 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 10,381,682 | | | |
|
|
5 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
6 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008.
23
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Common Stocks | | $ | 68,569,944 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 68,569,944 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 68,569,944 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 68,569,944 | | | |
|
|
The level classification by major category of investments is the same as the category presentation in the Portfolio of Investments.
The Portfolio held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
7 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 14, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
24
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 14, 2009
25
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
26
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), the portfolio in which Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund (the “Fund”) invests, with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), and the sub-advisory agreement with Atlanta Capital Management Company LLC (the “Sub-adviser”), including the fee structure of each agreement, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the respective agreements. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreements. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreements of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser and the Sub-adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s and the Sub-adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio and whose responsibilities include supervising the Sub-adviser. The Board specifically noted the Adviser’s in-house equity research capabilities. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management. With respect to the Sub-adviser, the Board took into account the resources available to the Sub-adviser in fulfilling its duties under the sub-advisory agreement and the Sub-adviser’s experience in managing equity portfolios.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof, including the Sub-adviser. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board also considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
27
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENTS CONT’D
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser and Sub-adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement, respectively.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees (including administrative fees) and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered the fact that the Administrator waived fees and/or paid expenses for the Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof, including the Sub-adviser, in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Portfolio, the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Portfolio and the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser or Sub-adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Portfolio and other advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates, including the Sub-adviser, are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
28
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC, “Atlanta Capital” refers to Atlanta Capital Management Company, LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust and Vice President of the Portfolio | | Trustee since 2007, President of the Trust since 2002 and Vice President of the Portfolio since 2001 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
29
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 1998 and of the Portfolio since 2001 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
William O. Bell, IV 7/26/73 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of Atlanta Capital. Officer of 2 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
William R. Hackney, III 4/12/48 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2001 | | Managing Partner and member of the Executive Committee of Atlanta Capital. Officer of 2 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Vice President of the Trust since 2001 and President of the Portfolio since 2007 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
30
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
31
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Sub-Adviser of Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Portfolio
Atlanta Capital Management Company, LLC1349 West Peachtree Street
Suite 1600
Atlanta, GA 30309
Administrator of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund
Eaton Vance ManagementTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ac1d/7ac1de449c2ac1c61a6d917b9cea79fdc4bac07e" alt="(PHOTO OF ARIEH COLL)"
Arieh Coll
Portfolio Manager
• | | Although global equity markets began the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, on a downward trajectory, stocks bounced strongly off the bottom set in early March and staged a broad-based rally that continued through the end of the 12-month period. Last fall, on the verge of a possible collapse of the global financial system, risk-averse investors reacted by running to the sidelines, sending stocks into a dramatic decline. By late winter, however, fiscal and monetary interventions by governments around the world began to fuel optimism that the financial crisis would end and global economic growth might resume. |
• | | Amid prospects for a better-than-expected 2009, investor risk appetite began to return, overcoming such lingering concerns as high consumer debt levels, rising unemployment and still-depressed home prices. Corporate profits also started showing improvement, benefiting from cost-cutting and easier earnings comparisons, which further supported the equity market’s rebound. Stocks that declined the most last fall, especially those lower-quality, cyclical issues farther out on the risk spectrum, tended to be those that recovered most quickly as the rally gained steam. |
|
• | | From March through September 2009, the broad-based S&P 500 Index posted strong gains, with only a slight pull back in October ending a string of consecutive monthly gains. For the full one-year period that ended October 31, 2009, the S&P 500 posted a 9.80% return, while the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 7.76% and the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index soared 18.84%. The large-cap Russell 1000 Index returned 11.20%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index gained 6.46%. In terms of investment styles, growth stocks widely outperformed their counterparts in the value space.1 |
|
• | | For the year that ended October 31, 2009, nine of the 10 sectors in the Russell MidCap Growth Index registered strong returns, beating most broad-based domestic indices. Driven by an increase in infrastructure spending, the materials sector posted the strongest gains. The cyclical information technology and consumer discretionary sectors also performed well, early beneficiaries of renewed optimism that the financial crisis and economy had stabilized. Telecommunication services was the only sector posting a negative absolute return, with shares of wireless services companies detracting from overall performance. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
• | | During the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, the Fund2 outperformed the S&P 500 Index by more than two to one, but lagged its primary benchmark, the Russell MidCap Growth Index (the Index). The Fund also outperformed its Lipper peer group, Lipper Mid-Cap Growth Funds. |
|
• | | The Fund performed well, on both an absolute and relative basis during the fiscal year, with much of the performance occurring in the second half of the fiscal year. For the fiscal year as a whole, the Fund benefited from holdings in the financials sector—especially insurance, real estate and commercial banking stocks—which outperformed similar stocks in the Index. Energy was the second-best performing sector, led by strong returns in coal stocks. Finally, the materials sector outperformed, led by the chemicals industry, as did the Fund’s telecommunication services and U.S. utilities holdings. |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08 – 10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A3 | | | 20.27 | % |
Class B3 | | | 19.21 | |
Class C3 | | | 19.19 | |
Russell MidCap Growth Index1 | | | 22.48 | |
S&P 500 Index1 | | | 9.80 | |
Lipper Mid-Cap Growth Funds Average1 | | | 16.74 | |
See pages 3 and 4 for more performance information, including after-tax returns. |
|
|
|
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
2 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio, with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
1
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | The Fund’s largest detractors were in the consumer discretionary, industrial and health care sectors. Textiles and diversified consumer stocks were the biggest laggards in the consumer discretionary sector, while construction and airline stocks hurt the most in the industrial sector. In health care, Fund selections in the biotechnology and health care provider industries underperformed. |
|
• | | In selecting stocks, management seeks a select portfolio of companies that it believes will grow faster over the long term than the U.S. economy and the U.S. stock market as a whole and that are reasonably priced in relation to their fundamental value. Management uses an intensive, research-driven approach that employs fundamental analysis and considers many factors, including the potential for price appreciation, an assessment of risk and return, development of the proper mix of securities in the portfolio and seeking attractive valuations. |
Lipper Quintile Rankings1
By total return as of 10/31/09
EATON VANCE TAX-MANAGED MULTI-CAP GROWTH FUND, CLASS A
LIPPER MID-CAP GROWTH FUNDS CLASSIFICATION
| | | | |
Period | | Quintile | | Ranking |
1 Year | | 2nd | | 166 of 491 funds |
3 Years | | 1st | | 53 of 432 funds |
5 Years | | 1st | | 37 of 358 funds |
| | |
1 | | Source: Lipper Inc. Rankings are based on percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not take sales charges into consideration. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio manager and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Information
Top 10 Holdings2
By net assets
| | | | |
GameStop Corp., Class A | | | 2.9 | % |
Liberty Entertainment, Series A | | | 2.8 | |
Crown Castle International Corp. | | | 2.7 | |
Wells Fargo & Co. | | | 2.6 | |
Owens Corning, Inc. | | | 2.6 | |
NII Holdings, Inc. | | | 2.4 | |
Allied World Assurance Holdings, Ltd. | | | 2.2 | |
Shoppers Drug Mart Corp. | | | 2.1 | |
Discover Financial Services | | | 2.0 | |
Massey Energy Co. | | | 2.0 | |
| | |
2 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 24.3% of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
Sector Weightings3
By net assets
| | |
3 | | As a percentage of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
2
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the Russell MidCap Growth Index, an unmanaged index of mid-cap growth companies, and the S&P 500 Index, a broad-based, unmanaged market index of common stocks. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A, the Russell MidCap Growth Index and the S&P 500 Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c55e6/c55e617b0f89b3a237dc155d86acc78fd1df3246" alt="(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)"
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 6/30/00.
A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class B shares and Class C shares on 7/10/00 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $11,657 and $11,681, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
Share Class Symbol | | EACPX | | EBCPX | | ECCPX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
One Year | | | 20.27 | % | | | 19.21 | % | | | 19.19 | % |
Five Years | | | 4.60 | | | | 3.79 | | | | 3.78 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 2.50 | | | | 1.66 | | | | 1.68 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | |
One Year | | | 13.39 | % | | | 14.21 | % | | | 18.19 | % |
Five Years | | | 3.37 | | | | 3.44 | | | | 3.78 | |
Life of Fund† | | | 1.85 | | | | 1.66 | | | | 1.68 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates – Class A: 6/30/00; Class B: 7/10/00; Class C: 7/10/00 |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class B shares reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.39 | % | | | 2.14 | % | | | 2.14 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
“Return Before Taxes” does not take into consideration shareholder taxes. It is most relevant to tax-free or tax-deferred shareholder accounts. “Return After Taxes on Distributions” reflects the impact of federal income taxes due on Fund distributions of dividends and capital gains. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who continue to hold their shares. “Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares” also reflects the impact of taxes on capital gain or loss realized upon a sale of shares. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who sell their shares.
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 20.27 | % | | | 4.60 | % | | | 2.50 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 20.27 | | | | 3.90 | | | | 2.13 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 13.18 | | | | 3.96 | | | | 2.16 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 13.39 | % | | | 3.37 | % | | | 1.85 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 13.39 | | | | 2.68 | | | | 1.49 | |
Return After Taxes on Distribution and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 8.70 | | | | 2.90 | | | | 1.59 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 19.19 | % | | | 3.78 | % | | | 1.68 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 19.19 | | | | 3.08 | | | | 1.31 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 12.47 | | | | 3.28 | | | | 1.46 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 18.19 | % | | | 3.78 | % | | | 1.68 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 18.19 | | | | 3.08 | | | | 1.31 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 11.82 | | | | 3.28 | | | | 1.46 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 19.21 | % | | | 3.79 | % | | | 1.66 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 19.21 | | | | 3.09 | | | | 1.29 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 12.49 | | | | 3.28 | | | | 1.44 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 14.21 | % | | | 3.44 | % | | | 1.66 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 14.21 | | | | 2.73 | | | | 1.29 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 9.24 | | | | 2.98 | | | | 1.44 | |
Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 6/30/00. Class B and Class C of the Fund commenced investment operations on 7/10/00. Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) reflect the deduction of the maximum initial sales charge and applicable CDSC, while Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) do not.
After-tax returns are calculated using certain assumptions. After-tax returns are calculated using the highest historical individual federal income tax rates and do not reflect the impact of state and local taxes. Actual after-tax returns depend on a shareholder’s tax situation and the actual characterization of distributions and may differ from those shown. After-tax returns are not relevant for shareholders who hold shares in tax-deferred accounts or to shares held by non-taxable entities. Return After Taxes on Distributions for a period may be the same as Return Before Taxes for the same period because no taxable distributions were made during that period, or because the taxable portion of distributions made during the period was insignificant. Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares for a period may be greater than or equal to Return After Taxes on Distributions for the same period because of losses realized on the sale of Fund shares.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
4
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,183.80 | | | | $8.31 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,177.60 | | | | $12.35 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,177.40 | | | | $12.40 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.60 | | | | $7.68 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,013.90 | | | | $11.42 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,013.80 | | | | $11.47 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.51% for Class A shares, 2.25% for Class B shares and 2.26% for Class C shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
5
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
Assets |
|
Investment in Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $63,377,170) | | $ | 73,569,586 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 203,391 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 73,772,977 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 278,613 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Administration fee | | | 10,148 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 35,765 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 60,046 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 384,614 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 73,388,363 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 102,438,441 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (39,041,276 | ) | | |
Accumulated net investment loss | | | (201,218 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolio | | | 10,192,416 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 73,388,363 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 45,868,191 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 4,369,646 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 10.50 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 11.14 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 7,300,320 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 754,202 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.68 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 20,219,852 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 2,086,323 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.69 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends allocated from Portfolio (net of foreign taxes, $8,210) | | $ | 640,885 | | | |
Interest allocated from Portfolio | | | 21,863 | | | |
Securities lending income allocated from Portfolio, net | | | 99,525 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (502,988 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 259,285 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Administration fee | | $ | 98,615 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 101,512 | | | |
Class B | | | 80,372 | | | |
Class C | | | 171,014 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 495 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 21,449 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 128,969 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 20,044 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 37,357 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 48,753 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 12,233 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 720,813 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | $ | (461,528 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (11,655,726 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | (4,953 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (11,660,679 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 19,684,760 | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 19,684,760 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 8,024,081 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 7,562,553 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | $ | (461,528 | ) | | $ | (415,493 | ) | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (11,660,679 | ) | | | (27,514,596 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments | | | 19,684,760 | | | | (38,895,017 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 7,562,553 | | | $ | (66,825,106 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | — | | | $ | (606,256 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (91,011 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (159,283 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | (6,777,256 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (2,724,125 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (3,800,678 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | — | | | $ | (14,158,609 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 12,808,953 | | | $ | 73,631,304 | | | |
Class B | | | 1,962,532 | | | | 3,064,951 | | | |
Class C | | | 5,213,191 | | | | 10,641,705 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | 6,507,868 | | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | 2,341,547 | | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | 3,057,193 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (30,509,749 | ) | | | (23,768,797 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (2,480,901 | ) | | | (3,092,542 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (6,307,829 | ) | | | (5,129,189 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 3,307,278 | | | | 1,541,276 | | | |
Class B | | | (3,307,278 | ) | | | (1,541,276 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (19,313,803 | ) | | $ | 67,254,040 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (11,751,250 | ) | | $ | (13,729,675 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 85,139,613 | | | $ | 98,869,288 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 73,388,363 | | | $ | 85,139,613 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income (loss) included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | (201,218 | ) | | $ | 140,784 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 8.730 | | | $ | 17.990 | | | $ | 12.750 | | | $ | 10.850 | | | $ | 10.060 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income (loss)(1) | | $ | (0.036 | ) | | $ | (0.010 | ) | | $ | 0.217 | (2) | | $ | (0.019 | ) | | $ | (0.072 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.806 | | | | (6.853 | ) | | | 5.276 | | | | 2.144 | | | | 0.862 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.770 | | | $ | (6.863 | ) | | $ | 5.493 | | | $ | 2.125 | | | $ | 0.790 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.197 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (2.200 | ) | | | (0.253 | ) | | | (0.225 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (2.397 | ) | | $ | (0.253 | ) | | $ | (0.225 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 10.500 | | | $ | 8.730 | | | $ | 17.990 | | | $ | 12.750 | | | $ | 10.850 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 20.27 | % | | | (43.97 | )% | | | 43.76 | % | | | 19.84 | % | | | 7.85 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 45,868 | | | $ | 56,537 | | | $ | 49,517 | | | $ | 25,559 | | | $ | 21,998 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.57 | % | | | 1.38 | % | | | 1.43 | % | | | 1.49 | % | | | 1.55 | % | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | (0.41 | )% | | | (0.07 | )% | | | 1.45 | %(2) | | | (0.16 | )% | | | (0.67 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 205 | % | | | 283 | % | | | 157 | % | | | 181 | % | | | 217 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment income per share reflects special dividends allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.265 per share. Excluding special dividends, the ratio of net investment income (loss) to average daily net assets would have been (0.31)%. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. The Portfolio’s adviser voluntarily waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2006). |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 8.120 | | | $ | 16.880 | | | $ | 12.070 | | | $ | 10.350 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income (loss)(1) | | $ | (0.089 | ) | | $ | (0.111 | ) | | $ | 0.120 | (2) | | $ | (0.096 | ) | | $ | (0.146 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.649 | | | | (6.375 | ) | | | 4.943 | | | | 2.041 | | | | 0.816 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.560 | | | $ | (6.486 | ) | | $ | 5.063 | | | $ | 1.945 | | | $ | 0.670 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.074 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (2.200 | ) | | | (0.253 | ) | | | (0.225 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (2.274 | ) | | $ | (0.253 | ) | | $ | (0.225 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 8.120 | | | $ | 16.880 | | | $ | 12.070 | | | $ | 10.350 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 19.21 | % | | | (44.36 | )% | | | 42.64 | % | | | 19.04 | % | | | 6.92 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 7,300 | | | $ | 10,119 | | | $ | 20,815 | | | $ | 17,797 | | | $ | 18,653 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 2.33 | % | | | 2.13 | % | | | 2.19 | % | | | 2.24 | % | | | 2.30 | % | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | (1.11 | )% | | | (0.84 | )% | | | 0.86 | %(2) | | | (0.85 | )% | | | (1.42 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 205 | % | | | 283 | % | | | 157 | % | | | 181 | % | | | 217 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment income per share reflects special dividends allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.263 per share. Excluding special dividends, the ratio of net investment income (loss) to average daily net assets would have been (1.02)%. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. The Portfolio’s adviser voluntarily waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2006). |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 8.130 | | | $ | 16.910 | | | $ | 12.090 | | | $ | 10.370 | | | $ | 9.700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income (loss)(1) | | $ | (0.100 | ) | | $ | (0.109 | ) | | $ | 0.111 | (2) | | $ | (0.100 | ) | | $ | (0.146 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.660 | | | | (6.379 | ) | | | 4.962 | | | | 2.045 | | | | 0.816 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.560 | | | $ | (6.488 | ) | | $ | 5.073 | | | $ | 1.945 | | | $ | 0.670 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | — | | | $ | (0.092 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (2.200 | ) | | | (0.253 | ) | | | (0.225 | ) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (2.292 | ) | | $ | (0.253 | ) | | $ | (0.225 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 9.690 | | | $ | 8.130 | | | $ | 16.910 | | | $ | 12.090 | | | $ | 10.370 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 19.19 | % | | | (44.33 | )% | | | 42.65 | % | | | 19.01 | % | | | 6.91 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 20,220 | | | $ | 18,483 | | | $ | 28,537 | | | $ | 18,224 | | | $ | 17,058 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 2.32 | % | | | 2.13 | % | | | 2.18 | % | | | 2.24 | % | | | 2.30 | % | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | (1.21 | )% | | | (0.83 | )% | | | 0.79 | %(2) | | | (0.89 | )% | | | (1.42 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 205 | % | | | 283 | % | | | 157 | % | | | 181 | % | | | 217 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment income per share reflects special dividends allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.260 per share. Excluding special dividends, the ratio of net investment income (loss) to average daily net assets would have been (1.05)%. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. The Portfolio’s adviser voluntarily waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2006). |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers three classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income and losses, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (57.9% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $37,857,698 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2016 ($23,990,714) and October 31, 2017 ($13,866,984).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
11
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make at least one distribution annually (normally in December) of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | 2008 | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,310,190 | | | |
Long-term capital gains | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,848,419 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was increased by $10,957, accumulated net investment loss was decreased by $119,526 and paid-in capital was decreased by $108,569 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for net operating losses, investments in passive foreign investment companies and foreign currency gain (loss). These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (37,857,698 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 8,807,620 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, investments in partnerships and partnership allocations.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
The administration fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for administrative services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $98,615. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $7,018 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $11,207 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the
12
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $101,512 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $60,279 and $128,261 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $595,000 and $1,615,000, respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $20,093 and $42,753 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $500, $11,000 and $5,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $13,865,323 and $33,492,295, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,490,348 | | | | 5,089,553 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 419,863 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (3,967,224 | ) | | | (1,900,703 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 372,986 | | | | 112,178 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (2,103,890 | ) | | | 3,720,891 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 248,576 | | | | 228,869 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 161,375 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (337,317 | ) | | | (257,295 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (402,910 | ) | | | (120,215 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (491,651 | ) | | | 12,734 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
13
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 650,214 | | | | 803,697 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 210,551 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (837,926 | ) | | | (427,672 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (187,712 | ) | | | 586,576 | | | |
|
|
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 16, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. No subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure have been identified.
14
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 16, 2009
15
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 89.2% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Auto Components — 0.6% |
|
Dana Holding Corp.(1) | | | 137,746 | | | $ | 779,642 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 779,642 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Automobiles — 0.0% |
|
Harley-Davidson, Inc. | | | 100 | | | $ | 2,492 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,492 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverages — 0.0% |
|
Central European Distribution Corp.(1) | | | 100 | | | $ | 3,111 | | | |
Heckmann Corp.(1) | | | 63 | | | | 268 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,379 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building Products — 3.0% |
|
Lennox International, Inc. | | | 15,000 | | | $ | 505,050 | | | |
Owens Corning, Inc.(1) | | | 151,000 | | | | 3,338,610 | | | |
USG Corp.(1) | | | 500 | | | | 6,570 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,850,230 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets — 0.1% |
|
Artio Global Investors, Inc.(1) | | | 5,639 | | | $ | 132,573 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 132,573 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 1.2% |
|
Celanese Corp., Class A | | | 54,000 | | | $ | 1,482,300 | | | |
Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc. | | | 3 | | | | 278 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,482,578 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 3.1% |
|
SVB Financial Group(1) | | | 13,300 | | | $ | 548,625 | | | |
Wells Fargo & Co. | | | 122,000 | | | | 3,357,440 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,906,065 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies — 0.8% |
|
Copart, Inc.(1) | | | 32,000 | | | $ | 1,029,440 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,029,440 | | | |
|
|
|
Communications Equipment — 1.8% |
|
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.(1) | | | 262,100 | | | $ | 2,248,818 | | | |
Polycom, Inc.(1) | | | 500 | | | | 10,735 | | | |
Riverbed Technology, Inc.(1) | | | 100 | | | | 2,049 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,261,602 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals — 0.9% |
|
3PAR, Inc.(1) | | | 121,000 | | | $ | 1,138,610 | | | |
Apple, Inc.(1) | | | 10 | | | | 1,885 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,140,495 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Construction & Engineering — 0.0% |
|
KBR, Inc. | | | 1,000 | | | $ | 20,470 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 20,470 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance — 4.3% |
|
American Express Co. | | | 48,500 | | | $ | 1,689,740 | | | |
Capital One Financial Corp. | | | 34,000 | | | | 1,244,400 | | | |
Discover Financial Services | | | 183,000 | | | | 2,587,620 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,521,760 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Consumer Services — 4.6% |
|
Apollo Group, Inc., Class A(1) | | | 37,900 | | | $ | 2,164,090 | | | |
Capella Education Co.(1) | | | 100 | | | | 6,890 | | | |
Corinthian Colleges, Inc.(1) | | | 145,000 | | | | 2,299,700 | | | |
H&R Block, Inc. | | | 72,000 | | | | 1,320,480 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,791,160 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services — 0.9% |
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.(1) | | | 100 | | | $ | 10,019 | | | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | | 28,000 | | | | 1,169,560 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,179,579 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 0.0% |
|
Maxcom Telecomunicaciones SAB de CV ADR(1) | | | 39 | | | $ | 131 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 131 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment — 1.0% |
|
GrafTech International, Ltd.(1) | | | 90,000 | | | $ | 1,215,000 | | | |
Vestas Wind Systems A/S(1) | | | 33 | | | | 2,315 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,217,315 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements16
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components — 0.2% |
|
Itron, Inc.(1) | | | 3,200 | | | $ | 192,128 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 192,128 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services — 2.1% |
|
Nabors Industries, Ltd.(1) | | | 46,000 | | | $ | 958,180 | | | |
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. | | | 58,000 | | | | 903,640 | | | |
Pride International, Inc.(1) | | | 176 | | | | 5,202 | | | |
Superior Well Services, Inc.(1) | | | 78,667 | | | | 834,657 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,701,679 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food & Staples Retailing — 2.1% |
|
Shoppers Drug Mart Corp. | | | 65,564 | | | $ | 2,604,867 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,604,867 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 0.5% |
|
Masimo Corp.(1) | | | 26,000 | | | $ | 690,820 | | | |
Thoratec Corp.(1) | | | 25 | | | | 657 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 691,477 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 2.1% |
|
CIGNA Corp. | | | 2,000 | | | $ | 55,680 | | | |
Express Scripts, Inc.(1) | | | 12,000 | | | | 959,040 | | | |
Health Management Associates, Inc., Class A(1) | | | 19,000 | | | | 115,900 | | | |
Henry Schein, Inc.(1) | | | 1,000 | | | | 52,830 | | | |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings(1) | | | 10,000 | | | | 688,900 | | | |
Quest Diagnostics, Inc. | | | 14,000 | | | | 783,020 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,655,370 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 3.7% |
|
Bally Technologies, Inc.(1) | | | 32,000 | | | $ | 1,260,480 | | | |
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 22,000 | | | | 1,289,420 | | | |
Scientific Games Corp., Class A(1) | | | 152,000 | | | | 2,138,640 | | | |
Starbucks Corp.(1) | | | 500 | | | | 9,490 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,698,030 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Durables — 3.1% |
|
Tempur-Pedic International, Inc.(1) | | | 101,372 | | | $ | 1,963,576 | | | |
Whirlpool Corp. | | | 28,300 | | | | 2,025,997 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,989,573 | | | |
|
|
|
Household Products — 1.1% |
|
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | | | 23,500 | | | $ | 1,336,680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,336,680 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 2.5% |
|
Admiral Group PLC | | | 1,000 | | | $ | 16,810 | | | |
Allied World Assurance Holdings, Ltd. | | | 62,000 | | | | 2,775,120 | | | |
Fairfax Financial Holdings, Ltd. | | | 969 | | | | 343,026 | | | |
Progressive Corp.(1) | | | 400 | | | | 6,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,141,356 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Internet & Catalog Retail — 2.7% |
|
HSN, Inc.(1) | | | 100 | | | $ | 1,494 | | | |
Netflix, Inc.(1) | | | 29,100 | | | | 1,555,395 | | | |
Priceline.com, Inc.(1) | | | 12,168 | | | | 1,919,989 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,476,878 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Internet Software & Services — 0.0% |
|
DealerTrack Holdings, Inc.(1) | | | 1,000 | | | $ | 16,480 | | | |
Move, Inc.(1) | | | 1,013 | | | | 2,077 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 18,557 | | | |
|
|
|
|
IT Services — 5.7% |
|
Accenture PLC, Class A | | | 39,000 | | | $ | 1,446,120 | | | |
Alliance Data Systems Corp.(1) | | | 44,500 | | | | 2,446,610 | | | |
MasterCard, Inc., Class A | | | 10,000 | | | | 2,190,200 | | | |
Western Union Co. | | | 67,000 | | | | 1,217,390 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,300,320 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Machinery — 1.1% |
|
Hansen Transmissions International NV(1) | | | 500 | | | $ | 1,048 | | | |
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | | | 23,078 | | | | 1,059,742 | | | |
PACCAR, Inc. | | | 7,200 | | | | 269,352 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,330,142 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Media — 4.6% |
|
Liberty Entertainment, Series A(1) | | | 115,000 | | | $ | 3,544,300 | | | |
McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc. (The) | | | 78,500 | | | | 2,259,230 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,803,530 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements17
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 1.9% |
|
Barrick Gold Corp. | | | 68,000 | | | $ | 2,443,240 | | | |
Silver Wheaton Corp.(1) | | | 1,000 | | | | 12,480 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,455,720 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multiline Retail — 1.0% |
|
Big Lots, Inc.(1) | | | 52,100 | | | $ | 1,305,105 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,305,105 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 7.6% |
|
Apache Corp. | | | 21,000 | | | $ | 1,976,520 | | | |
Brigham Exploration Co.(1) | | | 98,083 | | | | 931,788 | | | |
Centennial Coal Co., Ltd. | | | 2,000 | | | | 5,586 | | | |
Continental Resources, Inc.(1) | | | 1,000 | | | | 37,210 | | | |
Massey Energy Co. | | | 86,000 | | | | 2,501,740 | | | |
Newfield Exploration Co.(1) | | | 18,500 | | | | 758,870 | | | |
Patriot Coal Corp.(1) | | | 500 | | | | 5,650 | | | |
Petroleo Brasileiro SA ADR | | | 1,000 | | | | 46,220 | | | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc.(1) | | | 212,893 | | | | 2,177,895 | | | |
Uranium One, Inc.(1) | | | 423,000 | | | | 1,200,139 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,641,618 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Paper & Forest Products — 1.0% |
|
Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. | | | 25,100 | | | $ | 1,296,415 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,296,415 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Personal Products — 1.2% |
|
Avon Products, Inc. | | | 47,000 | | | $ | 1,506,350 | | | |
Bare Escentuals, Inc.(1) | | | 1,000 | | | | 12,630 | | | |
Herbalife, Ltd. | | | 86 | | | | 2,894 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,521,874 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals — 2.8% |
|
Abbott Laboratories | | | 100 | | | $ | 5,057 | | | |
Biovail Corp. | | | 85,000 | | | | 1,144,100 | | | |
King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | | | 192,000 | | | | 1,944,960 | | | |
Perrigo Co. | | | 14,000 | | | | 520,660 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,614,777 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services — 0.4% |
|
Verisk Analytics, Inc., Class A(1) | | | 20,387 | | | $ | 559,215 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 559,215 | | | |
|
|
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) — 0.4% |
|
Chimera Investment Corp. | | | 144,552 | | | $ | 504,486 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 504,486 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 3.4% |
|
Atheros Communications, Inc.(1) | | | 500 | | | $ | 12,310 | | | |
Cirrus Logic, Inc.(1) | | | 349,000 | | | | 1,689,160 | | | |
Micron Technology, Inc.(1) | | | 41,000 | | | | 278,390 | | | |
NVIDIA Corp.(1) | | | 54,500 | | | | 651,820 | | | |
Tessera Technologies, Inc.(1) | | | 74,000 | | | | 1,636,140 | | | |
Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc.(1) | | | 50 | | | | 1,419 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,269,239 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Software — 2.1% |
|
Ariba, Inc.(1) | | | 1,000 | | | $ | 11,820 | | | |
Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd.(1) | | | 75,500 | | | | 2,345,785 | | | |
Concur Technologies, Inc.(1) | | | 100 | | | | 3,564 | | | |
Rosetta Stone, Inc.(1) | | | 12,889 | | | | 267,447 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,628,616 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail — 4.6% |
|
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. | | | 55,896 | | | $ | 2,082,685 | | | |
CarMax, Inc.(1) | | | 500 | | | | 9,835 | | | |
GameStop Corp., Class A(1) | | | 153,375 | | | | 3,725,479 | | | |
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.(1) | | | 100 | | | | 2,662 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,820,661 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods — 2.9% |
|
Gildan Activewear, Inc.(1) | | | 79,226 | | | $ | 1,404,677 | | | |
Hanesbrands, Inc.(1) | | | 107,500 | | | | 2,324,150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,728,827 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 6.1% |
|
Crown Castle International Corp.(1) | | | 113,000 | | | $ | 3,414,860 | | | |
NII Holdings, Inc.(1) | | | 113,762 | | | | 3,063,610 | | | |
Rogers Communications, Inc., Class B | | | 45,000 | | | | 1,317,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,796,070 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $93,953,224) | | $ | 113,402,121 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements18
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Funds — 2.0% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Capital Markets — 2.0% |
|
iShares Russell Midcap Growth Index Fund | | | 31,000 | | | $ | 1,266,350 | | | |
MidCap SPDR Trust, Series 1 | | | 10,901 | | | | 1,303,106 | | | |
The India Fund, Inc. | | | 1,333 | | | | 37,377 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investment Funds | | |
(identified cost $2,742,069) | | $ | 2,606,833 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 1.7% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(2) | | $ | 2,112 | | | $ | 2,111,787 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $2,111,787) | | $ | 2,111,787 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 92.9% | | |
(identified cost $98,807,080) | | $ | 118,120,741 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 7.1% | | $ | 8,995,153 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 127,115,894 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
ADR - American Depositary Receipt
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(2) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements19
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $96,695,293) | | $ | 116,008,954 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $2,111,787) | | | 2,111,787 | | | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $20) | | | 20 | | | |
Dividends receivable | | | 38,117 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 17,171,156 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 135,330,034 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 8,072,659 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 74,195 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 441 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 66,845 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 8,214,140 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 127,115,894 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 107,802,233 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 19,313,661 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 127,115,894 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends (net of foreign taxes, $14,503) | | $ | 1,135,784 | | | |
Securities lending income, net | | | 173,345 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 38,135 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (22,898 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 1,324,366 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 739,347 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 5,072 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 82,827 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 37,337 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 6,026 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 870,609 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 453,757 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (14,463,323 | ) | | |
Investment transactions allocated from affiliated investment | | | 27,420 | | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | (8,196 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (14,444,099 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 31,592,781 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 31,592,781 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 17,148,682 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 17,602,439 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements20
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 453,757 | | | $ | 1,091,692 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (14,444,099 | ) | | | (31,813,632 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments | | | 31,592,781 | | | | (79,993,225 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 17,602,439 | | | $ | (110,715,165 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 15,242,208 | | | $ | 87,002,684 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (46,238,305 | ) | | | (54,709,084 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | (30,996,097 | ) | | $ | 32,293,600 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (13,393,658 | ) | | $ | (78,421,565 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 140,509,552 | | | $ | 218,931,117 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 127,115,894 | | | $ | 140,509,552 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements21
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1)(2) | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.72 | % | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.77 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 0.39 | % | | | 0.54 | % | | | 2.24 | %(3) | | | 0.59 | % | | | 0.10 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 205 | % | | | 283 | % | | | 157 | % | | | 181 | % | | | 217 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 21.24 | % | | | (43.60 | )% | | | 44.75 | % | | | 20.69 | % | | | 8.71 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 127,116 | | | $ | 140,510 | | | $ | 218,931 | | | $ | 150,563 | | | $ | 135,774 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.01% of average daily net assets for the year ended October 31, 2006). |
|
(2) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(3) | | Includes special dividends equal to 1.85% of average daily net assets. |
See notes to financial statements22
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to achieve long-term, after-tax returns. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund held an interest of 57.9% and 42.0%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management) and Eaton Vance Cash Collateral Fund, LLC (Cash Collateral Fund), affiliated investment companies managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR) and Eaton Vance Management (EVM), respectively. Cash Management and Cash Collateral Fund normally value their investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique in accordance with Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management and Cash Collateral Fund may value their investment securities based on available market quotations provided by a third party pricing service.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
23
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. However, if the ex-dividend date has passed, certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as the Portfolio is informed of the ex-dividend date. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends and capital gains have been provided for in accordance with the Portfolio’s understanding of the applicable countries’ tax rules and rates. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR, a subsidiary of EVM, as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.65% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $760,996 of which $21,649 was allocated from Cash Management and $739,347 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.65% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees
24
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $237,279,495 and $270,905,735, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 99,440,887 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 22,458,489 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (3,778,635 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 18,679,854 | | | |
|
|
5 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
6 Securities Lending Agreement
The Portfolio has established a securities lending agreement with SSBT as securities lending agent in which the Portfolio lends portfolio securities to qualified borrowers in exchange for collateral consisting of either cash or U.S. Government securities in an amount at least equal to the market value of the securities on loan. Cash collateral is invested in Cash Collateral Fund. The Portfolio earns interest on the amount invested in Cash Collateral Fund but it must pay (and at times receive from) the broker a loan rebate fee computed as a varying percentage of the collateral received. The net loan rebate fee received by the Portfolio amounted to $8,960 for the year ended October 31, 2009. In the event of counterparty default, the Portfolio is subject to potential loss if it is delayed or prevented from exercising its right to dispose of the collateral. The Portfolio bears risk in the event that invested collateral is not sufficient to meet obligations due on loans. At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no securities on loan.
7 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer Discretionary | | $ | 35,395,898 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 35,395,898 | | | |
Consumer Staples | | | 5,466,800 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,466,800 | | | |
Energy | | | 12,337,712 | | | | 5,586 | | | | — | | | | 12,343,298 | | | |
Financials | | | 14,369,009 | | | | 16,810 | | | | — | | | | 14,385,819 | | | |
Health Care | | | 6,961,624 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,961,624 | | | |
Industrials | | | 8,003,449 | | | | 3,363 | | | | — | | | | 8,006,812 | | | |
Information Technology | | | 17,810,957 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 17,810,957 | | | |
25
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Common Stocks (continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Materials | | $ | 5,234,713 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 5,234,713 | | | |
Telecommunication Services | | | 7,796,200 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,796,200 | | | |
|
|
Total Common Stocks | | $ | 113,376,362 | | | $ | 25,759 | * | | $ | — | | | $ | 113,402,121 | | | |
|
|
Investment Funds | | $ | 2,606,833 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,606,833 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 2,111,787 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,111,787 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 118,094,982 | | | $ | 25,759 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 118,120,741 | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Includes foreign equity securities whose values were adjusted to reflect market trading that occurred after the close of trading in their applicable foreign markets. |
The Portfolio held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 16, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
26
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 16, 2009
27
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
28
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), the portfolio in which Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund (the “Fund”) invests, with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio. The Board specifically noted the Adviser’s in-house equity research capabilities and experience in managing funds that seek to maximize after-tax returns. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the
29
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees (including administrative fees) and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund, the Portfolio and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund and the Portfolio, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Portfolio and other advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
30
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
31
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 1998 and of the Portfolio since 2000 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Arieh Coll 11/9/63 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2000 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 4 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Vice President of the Trust since 2001 and President of the Portfolio since 2002 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
32
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
33
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Administrator of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth FundEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Annual Report October 31, 2009 EATON VANCE TAX-MANAGED SMALL-CAP FUND |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“the SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
Nancy Tooke, CFA,
Portfolio Manager
• | | Although global equity markets began the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, on a downward trajectory, stocks bounced strongly off the bottom set in early March and staged a broad-based rally that continued through the end of the 12-month period. Last fall, on the verge of a possible collapse of the global financial system, risk-averse investors reacted by streaming to the sidelines, sending stocks into a dramatic decline. By late winter, however, fiscal and monetary interventions by governments around the world began to fuel optimism that the financial crisis would end and global economic growth might resume. |
• | | Amid prospects for a better-than-expected 2009, investor risk appetite began to return, overcoming such lingering concerns as high consumer debt levels, rising unemployment and still-depressed home prices. Corporate profits also started showing improvement, benefiting from cost-cutting and easier earnings comparisons, which further supported the equity market’s rebound. Stocks that declined the most last fall, especially those lower-quality, cyclical issues farther out on the risk spectrum, tended to be those that recovered most quickly as the rally gained steam. |
• | | From March through September 2009, the broad-based S&P 500 Index posted strong gains, with only a slight pull back in October ending a string of consecutive monthly gains. During that seven-month period, the Fund’s1 primary benchmark, the S&P SmallCap 600, performed even better, outpacing the broader S&P 500 Index. For the full one-year period that ended October 31, 2009, the S&P 500 posted a 9.80% return, while the S&P SmallCap 600 returned 5.56%. The large-cap Russell 1000 Index returned 11.20%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index gained 6.46%. In terms of investment styles, growth stocks widely outperformed their counterparts in the value space.2 |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
• | | For the year ending October 31, 2009, seven of the 10 sectors in the S&P SmallCap 600 Index (the Index) registered positive absolute returns. The cyclical consumer discretionary and information technology sectors posted the strongest gains, early beneficiaries of renewed optimism that the financial crisis and economy had stabilized. Driven by an increase in infrastructure spending, the materials sector performed well, as did the consumer staples sector, as consumer confidence gradually improved. Telecommunication services was by far the worst-performing sector for the Index, followed by financials. |
• | | The Fund posted positive returns for the year, outperforming the Index as well as its secondary benchmark, the small-cap Russell 2000 Index. The financials sector contributed most to the Fund’s relative performance for the year, primarily due to an underweight to commercial banks and stock selection in IT services and capital markets. The Fund’s avoidance of the thrifts and mortgage finance industry further added to returns. |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08 - 10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A3 | | | 11.10 | % |
Class B3 | | | 10.31 | |
Class C3 | | | 10.35 | |
Class I3 | | | -3.86 | * |
S&P SmallCap 600 Index2 | | | 5.56 | |
Russell 2000 Index2 | | | 6.46 | |
Lipper Small-Cap Core Funds Average2 | | | 11.82 | |
| | |
* | | Performance is cumulative since share class inception on 10/1/09. |
See pages 3 and 4 for more performance information, including after-tax returns.
| | |
1 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio, with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
2 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
1
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | In the materials sector, an overweighted allocation versus the Index was beneficial, given the strong performance of the group for the year. This, along with stock selection - particularly in metals & mining - helped relative returns. The information technology sector told a similar story, with the Fund’s overweighting and stock selection helping performance. |
• | | While the Fund was significantly overweighted in the poor-performing energy sector, stock selection boosted relative performance, especially in oil, gas & consumable fuels. In utilities, both a below-benchmark allocation and security selection were beneficial. |
• | | The Fund’s consumer discretionary investments detracted most from performance due to an underweighting of the sector and weak stock selection, especially in the textiles, apparel & luxury goods industry, hotels & restaurants, and specialty retailers. Stock selection in distributors and media, however, helped to mitigate the loss somewhat. |
• | | A significant overweighting to the consumer staples sector, along with weak stock selection, also detracted from performance, as did weak stock selection in the industrials sector. |
• | | Management continued to focus on stocks of companies with strong balance sheets, competitive positions and superior managements, who can navigate the current climate. We believe our research-driven investment process can serve shareholders well over the long term. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio manager and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
| | | | |
Top 10 Holdings1 | | | | |
|
By net assets | | | | |
| | | | |
IAMGOLD Corp. | | | 2.2 | % |
CARBO Ceramics, Inc. | | | 2.1 | |
Perrigo Co. | | | 2.1 | |
Mead Johnson Nutrition Co., Class A | | | 2.1 | |
Hanesbrands, Inc. | | | 2.0 | |
Sybase, Inc. | | | 2.0 | |
Euronet Worldwide, Inc. | | | 2.0 | |
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | | | 2.0 | |
Walter Energy, Inc. | | | 2.0 | |
FLIR Systems, Inc. | | | 1.9 | |
| | |
1 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 20.4% of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
Sector Weightings2
By net assets
| | |
2 | | As a percentage of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
2
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, a broad-based, unmanaged market index of 600 small-capitalization stocks traded in the U.S., and the Russell 2000 Index, a market capitalization weighted index of 2,000 small company stocks. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A, the S&P SmallCap 600 Index and the Russell 2000 Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6fe4/f6fe4179deae84e3a72e1843b453ca7253a1716a" alt="(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)"
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | ETMGX | | EMMGX | | ECMGX | | EIMGX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 11.10 | % | | | 10.31 | % | | | 10.35 | % | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 4.34 | | | | 3.57 | | | | 3.58 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | -1.12 | | | | -1.86 | | | | -1.86 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 1.31 | | | | 0.56 | | | | 0.53 | | | | -3.86†† | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 4.74 | % | | | 5.31 | % | | | 9.35 | % | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 3.10 | | | | 3.22 | | | | 3.58 | | | | N.A. | |
Ten Years | | | -1.71 | | | | -1.86 | | | | -1.86 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 0.82 | | | | 0.56 | | | | 0.53 | | | | -3.86 | †† |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates — Class A: 9/25/97; Class B: 9/29/97; Class C: 9/29/97; Class I: 10/1/09 |
|
†† | | Returns are cumulative since inception of the share class on 10/1/09. |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class B shares reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% — 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.27 | % | | | 2.02 | % | | | 2.02 | % | | | 1.02 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09, as supplemented. |
|
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 9/25/97. |
|
| | A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class B shares and Class C shares on 10/31/99 would have been valued at $8,288 and $8,289, respectively, on 10/31/09. A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class I shares on 10/1/09 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $9,614 on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
“Return Before Taxes” does not take into consideration shareholder taxes. It is most relevant to tax-free or tax-deferred shareholder accounts. “Return After Taxes on Distributions” reflects the impact of federal income taxes due on Fund distributions of dividends and capital gains. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who continue to hold their shares. “Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares” also reflects the impact of taxes on capital gain or loss realized upon a sale of shares. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who sell their shares.
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 11.10 | % | | | 4.34 | % | | | -1.12 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 11.10 | | | | 4.34 | | | | -1.12 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 7.22 | | | | 3.73 | | | | -0.95 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 4.74 | % | | | 3.10 | % | | | -1.71 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 4.74 | | | | 3.10 | | | | -1.71 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 3.08 | | | | 2.66 | | | | -1.43 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 10.35 | % | | | 3.58 | % | | | -1.86 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 10.35 | | | | 3.58 | | | | -1.86 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 6.73 | | | | 3.07 | | | | -1.56 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 9.35 | % | | | 3.58 | % | | | -1.86 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 9.35 | | | | 3.58 | | | | -1.86 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 6.08 | | | | 3.07 | | | | -1.56 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 10.31 | % | | | 3.57 | % | | | -1.86 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 10.31 | | | | 3.57 | | | | -1.86 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 6.70 | | | | 3.06 | | | | -1.56 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Ten Years |
Return Before Taxes | | | 5.31 | % | | | 3.22 | % | | | -1.86 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 5.31 | | | | 3.22 | | | | -1.86 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 3.45 | | | | 2.76 | | | | -1.56 | |
Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 9/25/97, and Class B and Class C of the Fund commenced investment operations on 9/29/97. Class I after-tax returns were not provided because the class has less than a full year of operations. Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) reflect the deduction of the maximum initial sales charge and applicable CDSC, while Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) do not.
After-tax returns are calculated using certain assumptions. After-tax returns are calculated using the highest historical individual federal income tax rates and do not reflect the impact of state and local taxes. Actual after-tax returns depend on a shareholder’s tax situation and the actual characterization of distributions and may differ from those shown. After-tax returns are not relevant to shareholders who hold shares in tax-deferred accounts or to shares held by non-taxable entities. Return After Taxes on Distributions for a period may be the same as Return Before Taxes for the same period because no taxable distributions were made during that period, or because the taxable portion of distributions made during the period was insignificant. Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares for a period may be greater than or equal to Return After Taxes on Distributions for the same period because of losses realized on the sale of Fund shares.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
4
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,184.00 | | | | $7.60 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,181.00 | | | | $11.71 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,180.50 | | | | $11.71 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $961.40 | | | | $0.99 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.20 | | | | $7.02 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,014.50 | | | | $10.82 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,014.50 | | | | $10.82 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.20 | | | | $6.06 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Class I had not commenced operations as of May 1, 2009. Actual expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.38% for Class A shares, 2.13% for Class B shares, 2.13% for Class C shares and 1.19% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 for Class A, Class B and Class C (to reflect the one-half year period) and by 31/365 for Class I (to reflect the period from commencement of operations on October 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009 (September 30, 2009 for Class I). The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
|
| ** | Hypothetical expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.38% for Class A shares, 2.13% for Class B shares, 2.13% for Class C shares and 1.19% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009 (September 30, 2009 for Class I). The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
5
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $106,700,385) | | $ | 116,289,887 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 199,609 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 116,489,496 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 267,944 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 45,766 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 94,564 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 408,316 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 116,081,180 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 195,582,414 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (89,090,736 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolio | | | 9,589,502 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 116,081,180 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 85,422,267 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 7,293,532 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 11.71 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 12.42 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 5,805,108 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 542,633 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 10.70 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 22,931,139 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 2,152,001 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 10.66 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 1,922,666 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 164,179 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 11.71 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends allocated from Portfolio | | $ | 763,594 | | | |
Interest allocated from Portfolio | | | 28,787 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (793,529 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment loss from Portfolio | | $ | (1,148 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 194,205 | | | |
Class B | | | 75,707 | | | |
Class C | | | 206,519 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 26,222 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 277,596 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 24,061 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 59,362 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 69,583 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 9,570 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 943,325 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | $ | (944,473 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (33,850,682 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (33,850,682 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 45,441,750 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 45,441,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 11,591,068 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 10,646,595 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | $ | (944,473 | ) | | $ | (1,450,030 | ) | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (33,850,682 | ) | | | 3,208,056 | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments | | | 45,441,750 | | | | (66,399,130 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 10,646,595 | | | $ | (64,641,104 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 27,628,658 | | | $ | 73,684,612 | | | |
Class B | | | 230,043 | | | | 1,203,596 | | | |
Class C | | | 4,035,854 | | | | 10,441,118 | | | |
Class I | | | 2,083,246 | | | | — | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (36,546,381 | ) | | | (26,016,142 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (2,105,752 | ) | | | (5,497,834 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (6,109,461 | ) | | | (6,125,683 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (39,716 | ) | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 4,438,358 | | | | 11,907,223 | | | |
Class B | | | (4,438,358 | ) | | | (11,907,223 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (10,823,509 | ) | | $ | 47,689,667 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net decrease in net assets | | $ | (176,914 | ) | | $ | (16,951,437 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 116,258,094 | | | $ | 133,209,531 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 116,081,180 | | | $ | 116,258,094 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 10.540 | | | $ | 16.140 | | | $ | 12.520 | | | $ | 10.300 | | | $ | 9.470 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(1) | | $ | (0.070 | )(2) | | $ | (0.120 | ) | | $ | (0.117 | ) | | $ | (0.073 | ) | | $ | (0.105 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.240 | | | | (5.480 | ) | | | 3.737 | | | | 2.293 | | | | 0.935 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.170 | | | $ | (5.600 | ) | | $ | 3.620 | | | $ | 2.200 | | | $ | 0.830 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 11.710 | | | $ | 10.540 | | | $ | 16.140 | | | $ | 12.520 | | | $ | 10.300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 11.10 | % | | | (34.70 | )% | | | 28.91 | % | | | 21.55 | % | | | 8.76 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 85,422 | | | $ | 80,868 | | | $ | 65,185 | | | $ | 46,895 | | | $ | 24,855 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 1.44 | % | | | 1.27 | % | | | 1.34 | % | | | 1.41 | %(6) | | | 1.44 | %(6) | | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.70 | )%(2) | | | (0.80 | )% | | | (0.82 | )% | | | (0.63 | )% | | | (1.04 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 95 | % | | | 93 | % | | | 78 | % | | | 99 | % | | | 223 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment loss per share reflects special dividends allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.008 per share. Excluding special dividends, the ratio of net investment loss to average daily net assets would have been (0.78)%. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio���s allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.01% and 0.01% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively). |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 9.700 | | | $ | 14.950 | | | $ | 11.690 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | $ | 8.980 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(1) | | $ | (0.123 | )(2) | | $ | (0.216 | ) | | $ | (0.205 | ) | | $ | (0.152 | ) | | $ | (0.170 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.123 | | | | (5.034 | ) | | | 3.465 | | | | 2.162 | | | | 0.870 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | (5.250 | ) | | $ | 3.260 | | | $ | 2.010 | | | $ | 0.700 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 10.700 | | | $ | 9.700 | | | $ | 14.950 | | | $ | 11.690 | | | $ | 9.680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 10.31 | % | | | (35.12 | )% | | | 27.89 | % | | | 20.76 | % | | | 7.80 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 5,805 | | | $ | 12,352 | | | $ | 36,554 | | | $ | 43,053 | | | $ | 47,222 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 2.20 | % | | | 2.02 | % | | | 2.09 | % | | | 2.16 | %(6) | | | 2.19 | %(6) | | |
Net investment loss | | | (1.37 | )%(2) | | | (1.55 | )% | | | (1.56 | )% | | | (1.40 | )% | | | (1.79 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 95 | % | | | 93 | % | | | 78 | % | | | 99 | % | | | 223 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment loss per share reflects special dividends allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.011 per share. Excluding special dividends, the ratio of net investment loss to average daily net assets would have been (1.50)%. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.01% and 0.01% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively). |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 9.660 | | | $ | 14.900 | | | $ | 11.650 | | | $ | 9.650 | | | $ | 8.940 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(1) | | $ | (0.132 | )(2) | | $ | (0.215 | ) | | $ | (0.206 | ) | | $ | (0.150 | ) | | $ | (0.170 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 1.132 | | | | (5.025 | ) | | | 3.456 | | | | 2.150 | | | | 0.880 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.000 | | | $ | (5.240 | ) | | $ | 3.250 | | | $ | 2.000 | | | $ | 0.710 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 10.660 | | | $ | 9.660 | | | $ | 14.900 | | | $ | 11.650 | | | $ | 9.650 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 10.35 | % | | | (35.17 | )% | | | 27.90 | % | | | 20.72 | % | | | 7.94 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 22,931 | | | $ | 23,037 | | | $ | 31,471 | | | $ | 26,681 | | | $ | 18,341 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(4)(5) | | | 2.19 | % | | | 2.02 | % | | | 2.09 | % | | | 2.16 | %(6) | | | 2.19 | %(6) | | |
Net investment loss | | | (1.44 | )%(2) | | | (1.55 | )% | | | (1.57 | )% | | | (1.38 | )% | | | (1.79 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 95 | % | | | 93 | % | | | 78 | % | | | 99 | % | | | 223 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Net investment loss per share reflects special dividends allocated from the Portfolio which amounted to $0.008 per share. Excluding special dividends, the ratio of net investment loss to average daily net assets would have been (1.52)%. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.01% and 0.01% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively). |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 12.180 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(2) | | $ | (0.008 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | | (0.462 | ) | | |
|
|
Total loss from operations | | $ | (0.470 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 11.710 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (3.86 | )%(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 1,923 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 1.19 | %(7) | | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.79 | )%(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 95 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the commencement of operations, October 1, 2009, to October 31, 2009. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
|
(8) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income and losses, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (71.3% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $91,471,354 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2010 ($57,501,413) and October 31, 2017 ($33,969,941).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
12
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make at least one distribution annually (normally in December) of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $42,030,467, accumulated net investment loss was decreased by $944,473 and paid-in capital was decreased by $42,974,940 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for net operating losses and expired capital loss carryforwards. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (91,471,354 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 11,970,120 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales and partnership allocations.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
Eaton Vance Management (EVM) serves as the administrator to the Fund, but receives no compensation. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report.
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $15,521 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $5,098 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $194,205 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding
13
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $56,780 and $154,889 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $6,939,000 and $11,542,000, respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $18,927 and $51,630 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $1,000, $11,000 and $8,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $28,259,129 and $38,453,518, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 2,798,413 | | | | 4,818,451 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (3,652,390 | ) | | | (1,974,673 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 477,705 | | | | 786,797 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (376,272 | ) | | | 3,630,575 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 26,007 | | | | 83,828 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (236,086 | ) | | | (402,480 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (520,465 | ) | | | (852,798 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (730,544 | ) | | | (1,171,450 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 457,619 | | | | 745,999 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (689,785 | ) | | | (474,322 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (232,166 | ) | | | 271,677 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Period Ended
| | | | | | |
Class I | | October 31, 2009(1) | | | | | | |
|
Sales | | | 167,481 | | | | | | | |
Redemptions | | | (3,302 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 164,179 | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class I commenced operations on October 1, 2009. |
14
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 15, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
15
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust
and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed
Small-Cap Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust), as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 15, 2009
16
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 95.8% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense — 1.7% |
|
Alliant Techsystems, Inc.(1) | | | 34,770 | | | $ | 2,704,411 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,704,411 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Air Freight & Logistics — 0.8% |
|
Hub Group, Inc., Class A(1) | | | 54,450 | | | $ | 1,353,627 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,353,627 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Auto Components — 0.8% |
|
Dana Holding Corp.(1) | | | 217,580 | | | $ | 1,231,503 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,231,503 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverages — 1.0% |
|
Central European Distribution Corp.(1) | | | 52,610 | | | $ | 1,636,697 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,636,697 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Biotechnology — 0.7% |
|
Martek Biosciences Corp.(1) | | | 67,410 | | | $ | 1,210,684 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,210,684 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building Products — 1.6% |
|
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.(1) | | | 68,270 | | | $ | 2,543,058 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,543,058 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets — 2.4% |
|
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.(1) | | | 42,590 | | | $ | 2,704,039 | | | |
Artio Global Investors, Inc.(1) | | | 53,280 | | | | 1,252,613 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,956,652 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 3.3% |
|
Calgon Carbon Corp.(1) | | | 173,140 | | | $ | 2,742,538 | | | |
Terra Industries, Inc. | | | 83,130 | | | | 2,641,040 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,383,578 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 0.3% |
|
Iberiabank Corp. | | | 7,040 | | | $ | 304,902 | | | |
Sterling Bancshares, Inc. | | | 36,770 | | | | 204,809 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 509,711 | | | |
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies — 2.3% |
|
Bowne & Co., Inc.(1) | | | 181,389 | | | $ | 1,184,470 | | | |
Clean Harbors, Inc.(1) | | | 45,010 | | | | 2,540,815 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,725,285 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Communications Equipment — 1.9% |
|
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.(1) | | | 354,420 | | | $ | 3,040,924 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,040,924 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals — 1.7% |
|
Stratasys, Inc.(1) | | | 178,205 | | | $ | 2,812,075 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,812,075 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Construction & Engineering — 3.3% |
|
Foster Wheeler AG(1) | | | 83,890 | | | $ | 2,348,081 | | | |
Shaw Group, Inc. (The)(1) | | | 38,900 | | | | 998,174 | | | |
Tutor Perini Corp.(1) | | | 112,970 | | | | 1,993,921 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,340,176 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Distributors — 1.5% |
|
LKQ Corp.(1) | | | 144,860 | | | $ | 2,501,732 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,501,732 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components — 5.1% |
|
FLIR Systems, Inc.(1) | | | 111,180 | | | $ | 3,091,916 | | | |
National Instruments Corp. | | | 102,830 | | | | 2,745,561 | | | |
Trimble Navigation, Ltd.(1) | | | 120,680 | | | | 2,530,659 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,368,136 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services — 4.5% |
|
CARBO Ceramics, Inc. | | | 59,400 | | | $ | 3,468,366 | | | |
Dril-Quip, Inc.(1) | | | 61,870 | | | | 3,006,263 | | | |
Superior Well Services, Inc.(1) | | | 86,370 | | | | 916,386 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,391,015 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 3.2% |
|
Corn Products International, Inc. | | | 93,780 | | | $ | 2,642,720 | | | |
Ralcorp Holdings, Inc.(1) | | | 47,440 | | | | 2,547,528 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,190,248 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements17
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 3.8% |
|
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.(1) | | | 49,940 | | | $ | 2,552,933 | | | |
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | | | 31,970 | | | | 1,261,856 | | | |
Wright Medical Group, Inc.(1) | | | 148,750 | | | | 2,417,187 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,231,976 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 1.5% |
|
VCA Antech, Inc.(1) | | | 101,390 | | | $ | 2,415,110 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,415,110 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 3.1% |
|
Bally Technologies, Inc.(1) | | | 67,420 | | �� | $ | 2,655,674 | | | |
Scientific Games Corp., Class A(1) | | | 165,910 | | | | 2,334,353 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,990,027 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Durables — 1.0% |
|
Tempur-Pedic International, Inc.(1) | | | 86,160 | | | $ | 1,668,919 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,668,919 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Products — 2.0% |
|
Church & Dwight Co., Inc. | | | 57,440 | | | $ | 3,267,187 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,267,187 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 1.5% |
|
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. | | | 93,440 | | | $ | 2,465,882 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,465,882 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Internet Software & Services — 1.2% |
|
Akamai Technologies, Inc.(1) | | | 85,270 | | | $ | 1,875,940 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,875,940 | | | |
|
|
|
|
IT Services — 3.5% |
|
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.(1) | | | 138,860 | | | $ | 3,284,039 | | | |
ManTech International Corp., Class A(1) | | | 55,650 | | | | 2,440,809 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,724,848 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences Tools & Services — 0.7% |
|
Bruker Corp.(1) | | | 111,610 | | | $ | 1,209,852 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,209,852 | | | |
|
|
|
Machinery — 0.7% |
|
Bucyrus International, Inc. | | | 26,590 | | | $ | 1,181,128 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,181,128 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Media — 1.1% |
|
Arbitron, Inc. | | | 85,160 | | | $ | 1,846,269 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,846,269 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 4.2% |
|
IAMGOLD Corp. | | | 267,220 | | | $ | 3,513,943 | | | |
Walter Energy, Inc. | | | 55,470 | | | | 3,244,995 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,758,938 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multi-Utilities — 1.4% |
|
CMS Energy Corp. | | | 174,570 | | | $ | 2,321,781 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,321,781 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multiline Retail — 1.6% |
|
Big Lots, Inc.(1) | | | 106,540 | | | $ | 2,668,827 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,668,827 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 5.3% |
|
Brigham Exploration Co.(1) | | | 202,940 | | | $ | 1,927,930 | | | |
Petrohawk Energy Corp.(1) | | | 54,230 | | | | 1,275,490 | | | |
Pioneer Natural Resources Co. | | | 43,360 | | | | 1,782,529 | | | |
Range Resources Corp. | | | 41,535 | | | | 2,078,827 | | | |
SandRidge Energy, Inc.(1) | | | 159,520 | | | | 1,631,890 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,696,666 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Paper & Forest Products — 1.5% |
|
Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. | | | 46,580 | | | $ | 2,405,857 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,405,857 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Personal Products — 3.7% |
|
Chattem, Inc.(1) | | | 41,710 | | | $ | 2,643,163 | | | |
Mead Johnson Nutrition Co., Class A | | | 79,590 | | | | 3,345,963 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,989,126 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals — 3.3% |
|
King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(1) | | | 200,950 | | | $ | 2,035,623 | | | |
Perrigo Co. | | | 90,610 | | | | 3,369,786 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,405,409 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements18
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Professional Services — 3.0% |
|
FTI Consulting, Inc.(1) | | | 63,610 | | | $ | 2,595,924 | | | |
Robert Half International, Inc. | | | 97,710 | | | | 2,266,872 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,862,796 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Road & Rail — 2.5% |
|
Genesee & Wyoming, Inc., Class A(1) | | | 42,430 | | | $ | 1,230,894 | | | |
Kansas City Southern(1) | | | 113,790 | | | | 2,757,132 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,988,026 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 4.4% |
|
Atheros Communications, Inc.(1) | | | 45,900 | | | $ | 1,130,058 | | | |
Cirrus Logic, Inc.(1) | | | 240,280 | | | | 1,162,955 | | | |
Teradyne, Inc.(1) | | | 224,018 | | | | 1,875,031 | | | |
Tessera Technologies, Inc.(1) | | | 88,230 | | | | 1,950,765 | | | |
Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc.(1) | | | 39,600 | | | | 1,124,244 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,243,053 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Software — 3.6% |
|
Sybase, Inc.(1) | | | 83,229 | | | $ | 3,292,539 | | | |
Synopsys, Inc.(1) | | | 115,200 | | | | 2,534,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,826,939 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail — 3.1% |
|
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. | | | 58,060 | | | $ | 2,163,316 | | | |
Hibbett Sports, Inc.(1) | | | 65,360 | | | | 1,224,846 | | | |
Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.(1) | | | 61,820 | | | | 1,645,648 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,033,810 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods — 2.0% |
|
Hanesbrands, Inc.(1) | | | 154,163 | | | $ | 3,333,004 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,333,004 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $134,354,350) | | $ | 156,310,882 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Private Placements — 0.0% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 0.0% |
|
Nevada Pacific Mining Co.(1)(2)(3) | | | 80,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Private Placements | | |
(identified cost $80,000) | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Special Warrants — 0.1% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 0.1% |
|
Western Exploration and Development, Ltd.(1)(2)(3) | | | 600,000 | | | $ | 90,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 90,000 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Special Warrants | | |
(identified cost $480,000) | | $ | 90,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 3.3% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(4) | | | 5,432 | | | | 5,431,653 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $5,431,653) | | $ | 5,431,653 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 99.2% | | |
(identified cost $140,346,003) | | $ | 161,832,535 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.8% | | $ | 1,223,757 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 163,056,292 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(2) | | Restricted security. |
|
(3) | | Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio. |
|
(4) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements19
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $134,914,350) | | $ | 156,400,882 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $5,431,653) | | | 5,431,653 | | | |
Dividends receivable | | | 15,807 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 2,312,498 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 164,160,840 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 919,686 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 91,906 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 540 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 92,416 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 1,104,548 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 163,056,292 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 141,569,760 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 21,486,532 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 163,056,292 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends | | $ | 1,047,720 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 39,391 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (22,051 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 1,065,060 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 891,659 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 6,603 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 109,801 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 53,519 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 8,344 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 1,069,926 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | $ | (4,866 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (44,312,234 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (44,312,234 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 60,538,806 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 60,538,806 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 16,226,572 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 16,221,706 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements20
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | $ | (4,866 | ) | | $ | (507,854 | ) | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (44,312,234 | ) | | | 5,110,744 | | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments | | | 60,538,806 | | | | (89,195,076 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 16,221,706 | | | $ | (84,592,186 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 29,224,452 | | | $ | 92,270,609 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (39,532,379 | ) | | | (38,574,422 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | (10,307,927 | ) | | $ | 53,696,187 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 5,913,779 | | | $ | (30,895,999 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 157,142,513 | | | $ | 188,038,512 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 163,056,292 | | | $ | 157,142,513 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements21
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1) | | | 0.75 | % | | | 0.74 | % | | | 0.74 | % | | | 0.74 | %(2) | | | 0.74 | %(2) | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | (0.00 | )%(3)(4) | | | (0.27 | )% | | | (0.22 | )% | | | 0.01 | % | | | (0.34 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 95 | % | | | 93 | % | | | 78 | % | | | 99 | % | | | 223 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 11.86 | % | | | (34.33 | )% | | | 29.67 | % | | | 22.33 | % | | | 9.52 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 163,056 | | | $ | 157,143 | | | $ | 188,039 | | | $ | 159,050 | | | $ | 153,121 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(2) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.01% and 0.01% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively). |
|
(3) | | Amount is less than (0.005)%. |
|
(4) | | Excluding special dividends, the ratio of net investment loss to average daily net assets would have been (0.09)%. |
See notes to financial statements22
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to achieve long-term, after-tax returns by investing in a diversified portfolio of publicly traded equity securities of small-cap companies. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund held an interest of 71.3% and 28.6%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities based on available market quotations provided by a third party pricing service.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
23
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. However, if the ex-dividend date has passed, certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as the Portfolio is informed of the ex-dividend date. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends and capital gains have been provided for in accordance with the Portfolio’s understanding of the applicable countries’ tax rules and rates. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.625% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $912,564 of which $20,905 was allocated from Cash Management and $891,659 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.625% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees
24
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $136,153,494 and $147,914,326, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 140,614,627 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 28,143,581 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (6,925,673 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 21,217,908 | | | |
|
|
5 Restricted Securities
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio owned the following securities (representing less than 0.1% of net assets) which were restricted as to public resale and not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (excluding Rule 144A securities). The Portfolio has various registration rights (exercisable under a variety of circumstances) with respect to these securities. The value of these securities is determined based on valuations provided by brokers when available, or if not available, they are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Date of
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Acquisition | | | Shares | | | Cost | | | Value | | | |
|
Private Placements | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Nevada Pacific Mining Co. | | | 12/21/98 | | | | 80,000 | | | $ | 80,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 80,000 | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
Special Warrants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Western Exploration and Development, Ltd. | | | 12/21/98 | | | | 600,000 | | | $ | 480,000 | | | $ | 90,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 480,000 | | | $ | 90,000 | | | |
|
|
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 90,000 | | | |
|
|
6 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
7 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
25
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Common Stocks | | $ | 156,310,882 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 156,310,882 | | | |
Private Placements | | | — | | | | — | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | |
Special Warrants | | | — | | | | — | | | | 90,000 | | | | 90,000 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 5,431,653 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 5,431,653 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 161,742,535 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 90,000 | | | $ | 161,832,535 | | | |
|
|
The level classification by major category of investments is the same as the category presentation in the Portfolio of Investments.
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Investments in
| | | | | | |
| | Investments in
| | | Special
| | | | | | |
| | Private Placements | | | Warrants | | | Total | | | |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 | | $ | 56,000 | | | $ | 180,000 | | | $ | 236,000 | | | |
Realized gains (losses) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)* | | | (56,000 | ) | | | (90,000 | ) | | | (146,000 | ) | | |
Net purchases (sales) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Accrued discount (premium) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
Net transfers to (from) Level 3 | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 90,000 | | | $ | 90,000 | | | |
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments still held as of October 31, 2009* | | $ | (56,000 | ) | | $ | (90,000 | ) | | $ | (146,000 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount is included in the related amount on investments in the Statement of Operations. |
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 15, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
26
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 15, 2009
27
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
28
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio (formerly, Tax-Managed Small-Cap Growth Portfolio) (the “Portfolio”), the portfolio in which Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund (formerly, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Growth Fund) (the “Fund”) invests, with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio. The Board specifically noted the Adviser’s in-house equity research capabilities and experience in managing funds that seek to maximize after-tax returns. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following
29
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates payable, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and the Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Portfolio, the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Portfolio and the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Portfolio and other advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the Portfolio advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund and the Portfolio to continue to share such benefits equitably.
30
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his and her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
31
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Since 1998 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Vice President of the Trust since 2001 and President of the Portfolio since 2002 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
32
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Nancy B. Tooke 10/25/46 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, Senior Managing Director and small- and mid-cap core portfolio manager with ForstmannLeff Associates (2004-2006). Previously, Executive Vice President and portfolio manager with Schroder Investment Management North America, Inc. (1994-2004). Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
33
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Administrator of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Principal Underwriter*
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer Agent
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Annual Report October 31 , 2009 EATON VANCE TAX-MANAGED SMALL-CAP VALUE FUND |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) will (if applicable) file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
M A N A G E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N O F F U N D P E R F O R M A N C E
Economic and Market Conditions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6a38/d6a38289f7d3d03bfbb621fa1f8953496d253d29" alt="(PHOTO OF GREGORY R. GREENE)"
Gregory R. Greene, CFA
Lead Portfolio Manager
• | | Although global equity markets began the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, on a downward trajectory, stocks bounced strongly off the bottom set in early March and staged a broad-based rally that continued through the end of the 12-month period. Last fall, on the verge of a possible collapse of the global financial system, risk-averse investors reacted by streaming to the sidelines, sending stocks into a dramatic decline. By late winter, however, fiscal and monetary interventions by governments around the world began to fuel optimism that the financial crisis would end and global economic growth might resume. |
|
• | | Amid prospects for a better-than-expected 2009, investor risk appetite began to return, overcoming such lingering concerns as high consumer debt levels, rising unemployment and still-depressed home prices. Corporate profits also started showing improvement, benefiting from cost-cutting and easier earnings comparisons, which further supported the equity market’s rebound. Stocks that declined the most last fall, especially those lower-quality, cyclical issues farther out on the risk spectrum, tended to be those that recovered most quickly as the rally gained steam. |
|
• | | From March through September 2009, the broad-based S&P 500 Index posted strong gains, with only a slight pull back in October ending a string of consecutive monthly gains. For the full one-year period that ended October 31, 2009, the S&P 500 posted a 9.80% return, while the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 7.76% and the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index soared 18.84%. The large-cap Russell 1000 Index returned 11.20%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index gained 6.46%.1 In terms of investment styles, growth stocks widely outperformed their counterparts in the value space. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
• | | For the year ending October 31, 2009, seven of the 10 sectors in the Russell 2000 Value Index (the Index) registered a modest absolute return that lagged the broader market.1 Driven by an increase in infrastructure spending, the materials sector posted the strongest gains. The cyclical information technology and consumer discretionary sectors also performed well, early beneficiaries of renewed optimism that the financial crisis and economy had stabilized. Financials was the worst-performing sector for the Index, with shares of commercial banks in particular proving a drag on returns. |
|
• | | The Fund2 posted positive returns for the same period, solidly outperforming the Index (except for Class I shares, which had less than one year of performance). Financials contributed most to the Fund’s relative returns for the year, due to a significant underweight allocation as compared to the Index and stock selection in commercial banks. Good performance from two energy equipment and services stocks held by the Fund but not represented in the Index also helped performance, |
Total Return Performance
10/31/08 — 10/31/09
| | | | |
Class A3 | | | 5.36 | % |
Class B3 | | | 4.56 | |
Class C3 | | | 4.55 | |
Class I3 | | | -2.68 | * |
Russell 2000 Value Index1 | | | 1.96 | |
Lipper Small-Cap Value Funds Average1 | | | 12.35 | |
| | |
* | | Performance since share class inception on 10/1/09. |
See pages 3 and 4 for more performance information, including after-tax returns.
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
2 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio, with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. Absent an allocation of certain expenses to the administrator of the Fund and the sub-adviser of the Portfolio, the returns would be lower. |
1
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
M A N A G E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N O F F U N D P E R F O R M A N C E
| | as did an overweighting in the resurgent consumer discretionary sector. |
• | | Fund performance relative to the Index was restrained by consumer staples stocks, particularly a food products company that had poorer-than-expected earnings. Health care stocks also detracted from performance, due to both an overweight allocation and stock selection. Stocks in the health care equipment and supplies industry were among the poorer performers. The Fund owned several names in this group that were not represented in the Index, dampening relative returns. |
• | | We continue to be optimistic about the long-term prospects for the market but cautious in the short term. The snap-back recovery has brought the market far in a short period of time, and while we believe the market had been oversold, we now, as always, have to position the Fund for the future. As always, we remain committed to finding well managed, inexpensive companies with strong balance sheets and cash flow in order to achieve long-term, after-tax returns for Fund shareholders. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
Top 10 Holdings1
By net assets
| | | | |
Washington Federal, Inc. | | | 2.7 | % |
Cleco Corp. | | | 2.5 | |
MAXIMUS, Inc. | | | 2.5 | |
Gardner Denver, Inc. | | | 2.5 | |
Tupperware Brands Corp. | | | 2.4 | |
Teleflex, Inc. | | | 2.3 | |
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | | | 2.3 | |
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. | | | 2.3 | |
AptarGroup, Inc. | | | 2.3 | |
Trustmark Corp. | | | 2.3 | |
| | |
1 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 24.1% of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
Sector Weightings2
By net assets
| | |
2 | | As a percentage of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
2
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
F U N D P E R F O R M A N C E
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the Russell 2000 Value Index, a market capitalization weighted index of small-capitalization stocks. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A and the Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c777/7c777ead8c5801a6b365a5893ea6f0042194a23c" alt="(LINE GRAPH)"
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | ESVAX | | ESVBX | | ESVCX | | ESVIX |
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | 5.36 | % | | | 4.56 | % | | | 4.55 | % | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 3.03 | | | | 2.26 | | | | 2.26 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 5.53 | | | | 4.76 | | | | 4.77 | | | | -2.68 | †† |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | |
One Year | | | -0.66 | % | | | -0.44 | % | | | 3.55 | % | | | N.A. | |
Five Years | | | 1.82 | | | | 1.94 | | | | 2.26 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.71 | | | | 4.76 | | | | 4.77 | | | | -2.68 | †† |
| | |
† | | Inception date — Class A, Class B and Class C: 3/4/02; Class I: 10/1/09 |
|
†† | | Returns are cumulative since inception of the share class on 10/1/09. |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class B shares reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% — 1st and 2nd years; 4% - - 3rd year; 3% — 4th year; 2% — 5th year; 1% — 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. Absent an allocation of expenses to the administrator of the Fund and the sub-adviser of the Portfolio, the returns would be lower. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Gross Expense Ratio | | | 1.97 | % | | | 2.72 | % | | | 2.72 | % | | | 1.72 | % |
Net Expense Ratio | | | 1.65 | | | | 2.40 | | | | 2.40 | | | | 1.40 | |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09, as supplemented 9/30/09. The Net Expense Ratio reflects a contractual expense reimbursement that continues through 4/30/10. Thereafter, the expense reimbursement may be changed or terminated at any time. Without this expense reimbursement, expenses would be higher. |
|
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 3/4/02. |
A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class B shares and Class C shares on 3/4/02 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $14,282 and $14,292, respectively, on 10/31/09. A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class I shares on 10/1/09 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $9,732 on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
F U N D P E R F O R M A N C E
“Return Before Taxes” does not take into consideration shareholder taxes. It is most relevant to tax-free or tax-deferred shareholder accounts. “Return After Taxes on Distributions” reflects the impact of federal income taxes due on Fund distributions of dividends and capital gains. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who continue to hold their shares. “Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares” also reflects the impact of taxes on capital gain or loss realized upon a sale of shares. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who sell their shares.
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 5.36 | % | | | 3.03 | % | | | 5.53 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 5.36 | | | | 2.34 | | | | 5.07 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 3.48 | | | | 2.67 | | | | 4.86 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | -0.66 | % | | | 1.82 | % | | | 4.71 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | -0.66 | | | | 1.14 | | | | 4.26 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | -0.43 | | | | 1.62 | | | | 4.14 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 4.56 | % | | | 2.26 | % | | | 4.76 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 4.56 | | | | 1.56 | | | | 4.29 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 2.96 | | | | 2.02 | | | | 4.19 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | -0.44 | % | | | 1.94 | % | | | 4.76 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | -0.44 | | | | 1.22 | | | | 4.29 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | -0.29 | | | | 1.74 | | | | 4.19 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 4.55 | % | | | 2.26 | % | | | 4.77 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 4.55 | | | | 1.55 | | | | 4.30 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 2.96 | | | | 2.02 | | | | 4.20 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 3.55 | % | | | 2.26 | % | | | 4.77 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 3.55 | | | | 1.55 | | | | 4.30 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 2.31 | | | | 2.02 | | | | 4.20 | |
Class A, Class B and Class C of the Fund commenced investment operations on 3/4/02. Class I after-tax returns were not provided because the class has less than a full year of operations. Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) reflect the deduction of the maximum initial sales charge and applicable CDSC, while Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) do not. Absent an allocation of certain expenses to the administrator of the Fund and the sub-adviser of the Portfolio, the returns would be lower.
After-tax returns are calculated using certain assumptions. After-tax returns are calculated using the highest historical individual federal income tax rates and do not reflect the impact of state and local taxes. Actual after-tax returns depend on a shareholder’s tax situation and the actual characterization of distributions and may differ from those shown. After-tax returns are not relevant to shareholders who hold shares in tax-deferred accounts or to shares held by non-taxable entities. Return After Taxes on Distributions for a period may be the same as Return Before Taxes for the same period because no taxable distributions were made during that period, or because the taxable portion of distributions made during the period was insignificant. Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares for a period may be greater than Return After Taxes on Distributions for the same period because of losses realized on the sale of Fund shares.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
4
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual* | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,174.20 | | | | $9.04 | *** | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,169.60 | | | | $13.12 | *** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,169.40 | | | | $13.12 | *** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $973.20 | | | | $1.17 | *** | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical** | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.90 | | | | $8.39 | *** | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,013.10 | | | | $12.18 | *** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,013.10 | | | | $12.18 | *** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.10 | | | | $7.12 | *** | | |
| | | |
| * | Class I had not commenced operations as of May 1, 2009. Actual expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.65% for Class A shares, 2.40% for Class B shares, 2.40% for Class C shares and 1.40% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 for Class A, Class B and Class C (to reflect the one-half year period) and by 31/365 for Class I (to reflect the period from commencement of operations on October 1, 2009 to October 31, 2009). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009 (September 30, 2009 for Class I). The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
|
| ** | Hypothetical expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.65% for Class A shares, 2.40% for Class B shares, 2.40% for Class C shares and 1.40% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
|
| *** | Absent an allocation of certain expenses to the administrator of the Fund and the sub-adviser of the Portfolio, expenses would be higher. | |
5
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $26,754,494) | | $ | 31,604,354 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 76,886 | | | |
Receivable from affiliate | | | 28,806 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 31,710,046 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 72,189 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Administration fee | | | 4,193 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 12,922 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 40,646 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 129,992 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 31,580,054 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 28,547,734 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (1,817,540 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolio | | | 4,849,860 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 31,580,054 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 21,727,395 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 1,810,551 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 12.00 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 12.73 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 2,638,253 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 234,788 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 11.24 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 6,317,462 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 561,546 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 11.25 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 896,944 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 74,736 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 12.00 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends allocated from Portfolio | | $ | 503,260 | | | |
Interest allocated from Portfolio | | | 259 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (306,773 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 196,746 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Administration fee | | $ | 40,568 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 47,502 | | | |
Class B | | | 26,108 | | | |
Class C | | | 53,621 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 500 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 12,883 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 55,967 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 16,432 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 22,449 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 59,531 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 11,052 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 346,613 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Allocation of expenses to affiliate | | $ | 147,401 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 147,401 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 199,212 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | $ | (2,466 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (1,095,550 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (1,095,550 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 2,989,518 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 2,989,518 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 1,893,968 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 1,891,502 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment loss | | $ | (2,466 | ) | | $ | (90,956 | ) | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions | | | (1,095,550 | ) | | | (689,465 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments | | | 2,989,518 | | | | (6,445,768 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 1,891,502 | | | $ | (7,226,189 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net realized gain | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,783,471 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (595,814 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (673,040 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | — | | | $ | (3,052,325 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 10,918,543 | | | $ | 8,336,836 | | | |
Class B | | | 443,819 | | | | 342,683 | | | |
Class C | | | 2,200,272 | | | | 1,451,061 | | | |
Class I | | | 947,942 | | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | 1,488,333 | | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | 464,355 | | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | 531,411 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (8,843,036 | ) | | | (5,434,692 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (912,594 | ) | | | (1,394,883 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (1,565,217 | ) | | | (1,539,228 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (2,956 | ) | | | — | | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 393,125 | | | | 503,874 | | | |
Class B | | | (393,125 | ) | | | (503,874 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 3,186,773 | | | $ | 4,245,876 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 5,078,275 | | | $ | (6,032,638 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 26,501,779 | | | $ | 32,534,417 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 31,580,054 | | | $ | 26,501,779 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 11.400 | | | $ | 16.050 | | | $ | 15.400 | | | $ | 14.640 | | | $ | 13.010 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income (loss)(1) | | $ | 0.022 | | | $ | (0.003 | ) | | $ | (0.058 | ) | | $ | (0.066 | ) | | $ | (0.087 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.578 | | | | (3.146 | ) | | | 1.857 | | | | 1.644 | | | | 1.717 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.600 | | | $ | (3.149 | ) | | $ | 1.799 | | | $ | 1.578 | | | $ | 1.630 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net realized gain | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.501 | ) | | $ | (1.149 | ) | | $ | (0.818 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.501 | ) | | $ | (1.149 | ) | | $ | (0.818 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 12.000 | | | $ | 11.400 | | | $ | 16.050 | | | $ | 15.400 | | | $ | 14.640 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 5.36 | % | | | (21.61 | )% | | | 12.30 | % | | | 11.24 | % | | | 12.53 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 21,727 | | | $ | 17,628 | | | $ | 18,978 | | | $ | 15,695 | | | $ | 14,303 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4)(5) | | | 1.65 | % | | | 1.65 | % | | | 1.69 | % | | | 1.75 | % | | | 1.75 | % | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 0.21 | % | | | (0.02 | )% | | | (0.37 | )% | | | (0.44 | )% | | | (0.61 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 66 | % | | | 103 | % | | | 80 | % | | | 49 | % | | | 24 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.55%, 0.32%, 0.32%, 0.26% and 0.28% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively). A portion of the subsidy was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. Absent this subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 10.750 | | | $ | 15.330 | | | $ | 14.870 | | | $ | 14.260 | | | $ | 12.770 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(1) | | $ | (0.049 | ) | | $ | (0.102 | ) | | $ | (0.168 | ) | | $ | (0.174 | ) | | $ | (0.189 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.539 | | | | (2.977 | ) | | | 1.777 | | | | 1.602 | | | | 1.679 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.490 | | | $ | (3.079 | ) | | $ | 1.609 | | | $ | 1.428 | | | $ | 1.490 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net realized gain | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.501 | ) | | $ | (1.149 | ) | | $ | (0.818 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.501 | ) | | $ | (1.149 | ) | | $ | (0.818 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 11.240 | | | $ | 10.750 | | | $ | 15.330 | | | $ | 14.870 | | | $ | 14.260 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 4.56 | % | | | (22.15 | )% | | | 11.41 | % | | | 10.45 | % | | | 11.67 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 2,638 | | | $ | 3,538 | | | $ | 6,412 | | | $ | 7,033 | | | $ | 7,802 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4)(5) | | | 2.40 | % | | | 2.40 | % | | | 2.44 | % | | | 2.50 | % | | | 2.50 | % | | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.51 | )% | | | (0.79 | )% | | | (1.12 | )% | | | (1.20 | )% | | | (1.36 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 66 | % | | | 103 | % | | | 80 | % | | | 49 | % | | | 24 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.55%, 0.32%, 0.32%, 0.26% and 0.28% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively). A portion of the subsidy was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. Absent this subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 10.760 | | | $ | 15.350 | | | $ | 14.880 | | | $ | 14.270 | | | $ | 12.780 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(1) | | $ | (0.053 | ) | | $ | (0.100 | ) | | $ | (0.169 | ) | | $ | (0.174 | ) | | $ | (0.189 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.543 | | | | (2.989 | ) | | | 1.788 | | | | 1.602 | | | | 1.679 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.490 | | | $ | (3.089 | ) | | $ | 1.619 | | | $ | 1.428 | | | $ | 1.490 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net realized gain | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.501 | ) | | $ | (1.149 | ) | | $ | (0.818 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | $ | (1.501 | ) | | $ | (1.149 | ) | | $ | (0.818 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 11.250 | | | $ | 10.760 | | | $ | 15.350 | | | $ | 14.880 | | | $ | 14.270 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 4.55 | % | | | (22.19 | )% | | | 11.47 | % | | | 10.44 | % | | | 11.66 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 6,317 | | | $ | 5,336 | | | $ | 7,145 | | | $ | 7,805 | | | $ | 6,968 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4)(5) | | | 2.40 | % | | | 2.40 | % | | | 2.44 | % | | | 2.50 | % | | | 2.50 | % | | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.54 | )% | | | (0.78 | )% | | | (1.12 | )% | | | (1.19 | )% | | | (1.36 | )% | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 66 | % | | | 103 | % | | | 80 | % | | | 49 | % | | | 24 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.55%, 0.32%, 0.32%, 0.26% and 0.28% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively). A portion of the subsidy was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. Absent this subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(5) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 12.330 | | | |
|
|
| | | �� | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment loss(2) | | $ | (0.001 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | | (0.329 | ) | | |
|
|
Total loss from operations | | $ | (0.330 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net realized gain | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 12.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | (2.68 | )%(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 897 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6)(7) | | | 1.40 | %(8) | | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.07 | )%(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 66 | %(4)(9) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the commencement of operations, October 1, 2009, to October 31, 2009. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | The administrator subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.58% of average daily net assets for the period ended October 31, 2009). A portion of the subsidy was borne by the sub-adviser of the Portfolio. Absent this subsidy, total return would have been lower. |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
|
(9) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income and losses, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (46.7% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $1,673,990 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2016 ($501,958) and October 31, 2017 ($1,172,032).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
12
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make at least one distribution annually (normally in December) of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-term capital gains | | $ | — | | | $ | 3,052,325 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net investment loss was decreased by $2,466 and paid-in capital was decreased by $2,466 due to differences between book and tax accounting for net operating losses. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (1,673,990 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 4,706,310 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales and partnership allocations.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
The administration fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for administrative services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $40,568. EVM and the sub-adviser of the Portfolio, Fox Asset Management LLC (Fox), have agreed to reimburse the Fund’s operating expenses to the extent that they exceed 1.65%, 2.40%, 2.40% and 1.40% annually of the Fund’s average daily net assets for Class A, Class B, Class C and Class I, respectively. This agreement may be changed or terminated after April 30, 2010. Pursuant to this agreement, EVM and Fox were allocated $110,551 and $36,850, respectively, of the Fund’s operating expenses for the year ended October 31, 2009. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report.
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $3,078 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $7,081 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
13
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $47,502 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $19,581 and $40,215 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amounts of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class B and Class C Plans were approximately $55,000 and $545,000, respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $6,527 and $13,406 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $200, $1,700 and $600 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $12,184,304 and $9,187,781, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,079,505 | | | | 635,154 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 103,717 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (856,038 | ) | | | (412,112 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 40,081 | | | | 37,769 | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 263,548 | | | | 364,528 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
14
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 44,636 | | | | 27,054 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 34,094 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (96,340 | ) | | | (110,917 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (42,612 | ) | | | (39,377 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (94,316 | ) | | | (89,146 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 229,731 | | | | 114,504 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | — | | | | 38,960 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (164,041 | ) | | | (123,128 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 65,690 | | | | 30,336 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Period Ended
| | | | | | |
Class I | | October 31, 2009(1) | | | | | | |
|
Sales | | | 74,975 | | | | | | | |
Redemptions | | | (239 | ) | | | | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 74,736 | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class I commenced operations on October 1, 2009. |
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 17, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
15
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust
and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed
Small-Cap Value Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 17, 2009
16
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 92.3% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Auto Components — 1.4% |
|
BorgWarner, Inc. | | | 31,500 | | | $ | 955,080 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 955,080 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 2.1% |
|
RPM International, Inc. | | | 81,200 | | | $ | 1,430,744 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,430,744 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 8.5% |
|
First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. | | | 52,200 | | | $ | 542,880 | | | |
Glacier Bancorp, Inc. | | | 91,200 | | | | 1,193,808 | | | |
National Penn Bancshares, Inc. | | | 91,800 | | | | 515,916 | | | |
Prosperity Bancshares, Inc. | | | 43,900 | | | | 1,571,181 | | | |
Sterling Bancshares, Inc. | | | 69,200 | | | | 385,444 | | | |
Trustmark Corp. | | | 81,200 | | | | 1,538,740 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,747,969 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies — 1.4% |
|
Brink’s Co. (The) | | | 39,700 | | | $ | 942,081 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 942,081 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Communications Equipment — 3.1% |
|
Brocade Communications Systems, Inc.(1) | | | 154,100 | | | $ | 1,322,178 | | | |
NETGEAR, Inc.(1) | | | 40,700 | | | | 741,961 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,064,139 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Construction & Engineering — 1.9% |
|
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. NV | | | 37,900 | | | $ | 712,899 | | | |
Tutor Perini Corp.(1) | | | 33,800 | | | | 596,570 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,309,469 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Containers & Packaging — 2.3% |
|
AptarGroup, Inc. | | | 44,200 | | | $ | 1,560,702 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,560,702 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 5.8% |
|
Cleco Corp. | | | 69,200 | | | $ | 1,712,700 | | | |
Portland General Electric Co. | | | 55,600 | | | | 1,033,604 | | | |
Westar Energy, Inc. | | | 60,600 | | | | 1,160,490 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,906,794 | | | |
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment — 3.2% |
|
A.O. Smith Corp. | | | 33,900 | | | $ | 1,343,457 | | | |
General Cable Corp.(1) | | | 25,700 | | | | 800,298 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,143,755 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services — 5.1% |
|
Bristow Group, Inc.(1) | | | 35,300 | | | $ | 1,028,995 | | | |
Exterran Holdings, Inc.(1) | | | 60,100 | | | | 1,227,843 | | | |
Oil States International, Inc.(1) | | | 35,100 | | | | 1,208,844 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,465,682 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food & Staples Retailing — 1.3% |
|
BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc.(1) | | | 25,800 | | | $ | 903,774 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 903,774 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 1.5% |
|
TreeHouse Foods, Inc.(1) | | | 27,100 | | | $ | 1,013,540 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,013,540 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 4.7% |
|
Teleflex, Inc. | | | 31,800 | | | $ | 1,582,050 | | | |
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. | | | 39,900 | | | | 1,574,853 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,156,903 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 1.9% |
|
Owens & Minor, Inc. | | | 30,900 | | | $ | 1,263,501 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,263,501 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 1.9% |
|
Jack in the Box, Inc.(1) | | | 70,300 | | | $ | 1,318,828 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,318,828 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Durables — 2.4% |
|
Tupperware Brands Corp. | | | 36,600 | | | $ | 1,647,732 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,647,732 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 3.4% |
|
Argo Group International Holding, Ltd.(1) | | | 10,000 | | | $ | 339,600 | | | |
Aspen Insurance Holdings, Ltd. | | | 50,700 | | | | 1,308,060 | | | |
Protective Life Corp. | | | 34,500 | | | | 664,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,311,785 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements17
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
IT Services — 2.5% |
|
MAXIMUS, Inc. | | | 36,700 | | | $ | 1,697,742 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,697,742 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences Tools & Services — 1.1% |
|
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.(1) | | | 7,500 | | | $ | 731,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 731,250 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Machinery — 11.9% |
|
Barnes Group, Inc. | | | 82,100 | | | $ | 1,301,285 | | | |
Crane Co. | | | 45,000 | | | | 1,253,250 | | | |
Gardner Denver, Inc.(1) | | | 46,800 | | | | 1,680,588 | | | |
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. | | | 23,700 | | | | 1,124,328 | | | |
Nordson Corp. | | | 27,500 | | | | 1,451,175 | | | |
Wabtec Corp. | | | 34,600 | | | | 1,271,896 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,082,522 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 2.1% |
|
Walter Energy, Inc. | | | 24,000 | | | $ | 1,404,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,404,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 1.6% |
|
Comstock Resources, Inc.(1) | | | 25,900 | | | $ | 1,064,231 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,064,231 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Personal Products — 1.8% |
|
Chattem, Inc.(1) | | | 18,850 | | | $ | 1,194,525 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,194,525 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Professional Services — 1.9% |
|
Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc. | | | 29,700 | | | $ | 1,294,326 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,294,326 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Road & Rail — 2.0% |
|
Arkansas Best Corp. | | | 12,300 | | | $ | 317,586 | | | |
Genesee & Wyoming, Inc., Class A(1) | | | 34,700 | | | | 1,006,647 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,324,233 | | | |
|
|
|
Software — 2.2% |
|
JDA Software Group, Inc.(1) | | | 48,300 | | | $ | 958,272 | | | |
Netscout Systems, Inc.(1) | | | 45,800 | | | | 562,882 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,521,154 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail — 4.3% |
|
Buckle, Inc. (The) | | | 11,600 | | | $ | 348,116 | | | |
Children’s Place Retail Stores, Inc. (The)(1) | | | 33,400 | | | | 1,050,430 | | | |
Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc.(1) | | | 65,700 | | | | 1,490,733 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,889,279 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods — 3.6% |
|
Carter’s, Inc.(1) | | | 64,600 | | | $ | 1,524,560 | | | |
Hanesbrands, Inc.(1) | | | 41,400 | | | | 895,068 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,419,628 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Thrifts & Mortgage Finance — 5.4% |
|
Astoria Financial Corp. | | | 30,900 | | | $ | 308,382 | | | |
First Niagara Financial Group, Inc. | | | 119,200 | | | | 1,530,528 | | | |
Washington Federal, Inc. | | | 105,000 | | | | 1,800,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,639,660 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $52,739,217) | | $ | 62,405,028 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 92.3% | | |
(identified cost $52,739,217) | | $ | 62,405,028 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 7.7% | | $ | 5,223,507 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 67,628,535 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
See notes to financial statements18
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investments, at value (identified cost, $52,739,217) | | $ | 62,405,028 | | | |
Cash | | | 5,464,348 | | | |
Dividends receivable | | | 38,116 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 67,907,492 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 174,027 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 59,846 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 240 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 44,844 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 278,957 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 67,628,535 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 57,962,724 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 9,665,811 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 67,628,535 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends | | $ | 1,091,642 | | | |
Interest | | | 585 | | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 1,092,227 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 584,080 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 2,986 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 43,622 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 29,388 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 3,419 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 663,495 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 428,732 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (3,618,049 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (3,618,049 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 6,761,258 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 6,761,258 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 3,143,209 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 3,571,941 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements19
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 428,732 | | | $ | 348,552 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions | | | (3,618,049 | ) | | | (2,701,584 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments | | | 6,761,258 | | | | (13,498,031 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 3,571,941 | | | $ | (15,851,063 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 13,149,539 | | | $ | 27,291,365 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (10,871,040 | ) | | | (9,173,427 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | 2,278,499 | | | $ | 18,117,938 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 5,850,440 | | | $ | 2,266,875 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 61,778,095 | | | $ | 59,511,220 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 67,628,535 | | | $ | 61,778,095 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements20
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(1) | | | 1.14 | % | | | 1.12 | % | | | 1.14 | % | | | 1.14 | % | | | 1.15 | % | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 0.73 | % | | | 0.51 | % | | | 0.19 | % | | | 0.17 | % | | | (0.00 | )%(2) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 66 | % | | | 103 | % | | | 80 | % | | | 49 | % | | | 24 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 5.89 | % | | | (21.19 | )% | | | 12.92 | % | | | 11.91 | % | | | 13.20 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 67,629 | | | $ | 61,778 | | | $ | 59,511 | | | $ | 54,331 | | | $ | 50,791 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(2) | | Amounts to less than (0.01)%. |
See notes to financial statements21
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to achieve long-term after-tax returns by investing in a diversified portfolio of value stocks of small-cap companies. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund held an interest of 46.7% and 53.3%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with
22
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM), as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 1.00% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. Pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement, BMR pays Fox Asset Management LLC (Fox), an affiliate of EVM, a portion of its adviser fee for sub-advisory services provided to the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the investment adviser fee was 1.00% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets and amounted to $584,080.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $37,675,997 and $35,897,257, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 52,971,612 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 11,068,311 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (1,634,895 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 9,433,416 | | | |
|
|
5 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
6 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
23
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | |
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | |
| | | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | |
| |
Common Stocks | | $ | 62,405,028 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 62,405,028 | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 62,405,028 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 62,405,028 | |
|
|
The level classification by major category of investments is the same as the category presentation in the Portfolio of Investments.
The Portfolio held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
7 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 17, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
24
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other audit procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 17, 2009
25
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
26
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), the portfolio in which Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund (the “Fund”) invests, with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), and the sub-advisory agreement with Fox Asset Management LLC (the “Sub-adviser”), including the fee structure of each agreement, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the respective agreements. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreements. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreements of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser and the Sub-adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s and the Sub-adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio and whose responsibilities include supervising the Sub-adviser. The Board specifically noted the Adviser’s in-house equity research capabilities. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management. With respect to the Sub-adviser, the Board took into account the resources available to the Sub-adviser in fulfilling its duties under the sub-advisory agreement and the Sub-adviser’s experience in managing equity portfolios.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof, including the Sub-adviser. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
27
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser and Sub-adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement, respectively.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees, including administrative fees, and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered the fact that the Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses for the Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof, including the Sub-adviser, in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Portfolio, the Fund and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates, including the Sub-adviser, in connection with its relationship with the Portfolio and the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Portfolio and other advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates, including the Sub-adviser, are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, including the Sub-adviser, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates, including the Sub-adviser, and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the Portfolio advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates, including the Sub-adviser, and the Fund and the Portfolio to continue to share such benefits equitably.
28
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “Fox” refers to Fox Asset Management LLC. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust and Vice President of the Portfolio | | Trustee since 2007, President of the Trust since 2002 and Vice President of the Portfolio since 2001 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
29
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 1998 and of the Portfolio since 2001 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Gregory R. Greene 11/13/66 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2006 | | Managing Director of Fox and member of the Investment Committee. Officer of 16 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert J. Milmore 4/3/69 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of Fox and member of the Investment Committee. Previously, Manager of International Treasury of Cendant Corporation (2001-2005). Officer of 16 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
J. Bradley Ohlmuller 6/14/68 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2006 | | Principal of Fox and member of the Investment Committee. Previously, Vice President and research analyst at Goldman Sachs & Co. (2001-2004). Officer of 16 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
30
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Vice President of the Trust since 2001 and President of the Portfolio since 2002 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
31
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Sub-Adviser of Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Portfolio
Fox Asset Management LLC
331 Newman Springs Road, Suite 122
Red Bank, NJ 07701
Administrator of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Principal Underwriter*
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer Agent
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Annual Report October 31, 2009 EATON VANCE TAX-MANAGED VALUE FUND |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92d8d/92d8d572e1ff2973b6b810e3b367c43d91966c3d" alt="(PHOTO OF MICHAEL R. MACH)"
Michael R. Mach, CFA
Portfolio Manager
• | | Although global equity markets began the fiscal year ending October 31, 2009, on a downward trajectory, stocks bounced strongly off the bottom set in early March and staged a broad-based rally that continued through the end of the 12-month period. Last fall, on the verge of a possible collapse of the global financial system, risk-averse investors reacted by streaming to the sidelines, sending stocks into a dramatic decline. By late winter, however, fiscal and monetary interventions by governments around the world began to fuel optimism that the financial crisis would end and global economic growth might resume. |
• | | Amid prospects for a better-than-expected 2009, investor risk appetite began to return, overcoming such lingering concerns as high consumer debt levels, rising unemployment and still-depressed home prices. Corporate profits also started showing improvement, benefiting from cost-cutting and easier earnings comparisons, which further supported the equity market’s rebound. Stocks that declined the most last fall, especially those lower-quality, cyclical issues farther out on the risk spectrum, tended to be those that recovered most quickly as the rally gained steam. |
• | | From March through September 2009, the broad-based S&P 500 Index posted strong gains, with only a slight pull back in October ending a string of consecutive monthly gains. For the full one-year period that ended October 31, 2009, the S&P 500 had a 9.80% return, while the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 7.76% and the technology-laden Nasdaq Composite Index soared 18.84%. The large-cap Russell 1000 Index returned 11.20%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index gained 6.46%. In terms of investment styles, growth stocks widely outperformed their counterparts in the value space.1 |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
• | | The Fund2 recorded positive returns for the year ending October 31, 2009, although it trailed its benchmark — the Russell 1000 Value Index (the Index). As shown in the chart on page 2, the Fund’s standing (for Class A shares) within its Lipper peer category slipped on a short-term basis. However, its stronger longer-term record remained intact. |
• | | The cyclical consumer discretionary and information technology sectors posted the strongest gains for the Index, early beneficiaries of renewed optimism that the financial crisis and economy had stabilized. Driven by an increase in infrastructure spending, the materials sector also performed well. |
• | | The Fund’s stock selection in financials — the Index’s largest sector weighting and the worst performer of the period — contributed the most to relative returns. In particular, the Fund’s underweighting in a poor-performing diversified financial services stock and an above-benchmark allocation to a consumer finance stock benefited returns. Selection in the utilities sector also provided a boost – especially among electric utilities and independent power producers. |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08 – 10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A3 | | | 4.01 | % |
Class B3 | | | 3.92 | |
Class C3 | | | 3.19 | |
Class I3 | | | 4.22 | |
Russell 1000 Value Index1 | | | 4.78 | |
Lipper Large-Cap Value Funds Average1 | | | 8.59 | |
See pages 3 and 4 for more performance information, including after-tax returns.
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
2 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, Tax-Managed Value Portfolio, with the same objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments are to the Portfolio’s holdings. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
1
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | On the downside, the health care sector detracted the most from the Fund’s comparative results. Relative underweights in big pharmaceuticals names, exposure to an underperforming health care equipment company and inopportune allocations to two large health care providers all had a negative impact. Among consumer discretionary stocks, not owning a major auto-maker that performed well hurt, as did selection in media stocks. |
• | | Management continues to believe that success in investing requires two things: a common sense approach to a particular style—in this instance, tax-managed large-cap value—and a committed team of experienced investment professionals who believe in that strategy. Management believes that putting those two things together will lead to a successful outcome in the long run. |
• | | To that end, management is pleased to announce that, effective December 31, 2009, the Portfolio will be managed by a team of portfolio managers led by Michael R. Mach. Mr. Mach has served as a portfolio manager of the Portfolio since operations commenced and manages other Eaton Vance portfolios. The other members of the portfolio management team are Matthew F. Beaudry, John D. Crowley and Stephen J. Kaszynski, each of whom are Vice Presidents of Eaton Vance and manage other Eaton Vance portfolios. |
• | | As a fellow shareholder, I thank you for your continued confidence and paricipation in the Fund. |
| | |
Lipper Quintile Rankings1 |
|
|
By total return as of 10/31/09 |
EATON VANCE TAX-MANAGED VALUE FUND CLASS A
LIPPER LARGE-CAP VALUE FUNDS CLASSIFICATION
| | | | | | | | |
Period | | Quintile | | Ranking |
1 Year | | 5th | | 431 of 534 funds |
3 Years | | 2nd | | 97 of 461 funds |
5 Years | | 1st | | 41 of 389 funds |
| | |
1 | | Source: Lipper Inc. Rankings are based on percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not take sales charges into consideration. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. It is not possible to invest in a Lipper Classification. |
Portfolio Composition
| | |
Top 10 Holdings2 |
|
|
By net assets |
| | | | |
Wells Fargo & Co. | | | 2.8 | % |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | | 2.8 | |
Chevron Corp. | | | 2.7 | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | | | 2.6 | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | | | 2.5 | |
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. | | | 2.4 | |
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | | | 2.3 | |
Bank of America Corp. | | | 2.2 | |
AT&T, Inc. | | | 2.2 | |
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 2.1 | |
| | |
2 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 24.6% of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
| | |
Sector Weightings3 |
|
|
By net assets |
| | |
3 | | As a percentage of the Portfolio’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio manager and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
2
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the Russell 1000 Value Index, a broad-based, unmanaged market index of 1,000 U.S. value stocks. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A and the Russell 1000 Value Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b82b/3b82b33a2f0a1adf7c9b9a84f7ed5bc6cd2883d7" alt="(GRAPH)"
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 12/27/99.
A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class B shares on 1/18/00 (commencement of operations), Class C shares on 1/24/00 (commencement of operations) and Class I shares on 11/30/07 (commencement of operations) would have been valued at $14,207, $14,471, and $7,178, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total returns do not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EATVX | | EBTVX | | ECTVX | | EITVX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
One Year | | | 4.01 | % | | | 3.92 | % | | | 3.19 | % | | | 4.22 | % |
Five Years | | | 2.16 | | | | 1.54 | | | | 1.40 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.66 | | | | 3.65 | | | | 3.85 | | | | -15.48 | |
|
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
One Year | | | -1.98 | % | | | -1.08 | % | | | 2.19 | % | | | 4.22 | % |
Five Years | | | 0.96 | | | | 1.16 | | | | 1.40 | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 4.04 | | | | 3.65 | | | | 3.85 | | | | -15.48 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates – Class A: 12/27/99; Class B: 1/18/00; Class C: 1/24/00; and Class I: 11/30/07 |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B and Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge. SEC returns for Class B shares reflect the applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 5% - 1st and 2nd years; 4% - - 3rd year; 3% - 4th year; 2% - 5th year; 1% - 6th year. SEC returns for Class C reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.16 | % | | | 1.91 | % | | | 1.91 | % | | | 0.91 | % |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
“Return Before Taxes” does not take into consideration shareholder taxes. It is most relevant to tax-free or tax-deferred shareholder accounts. “Return After Taxes on Distributions” reflects the impact of federal income taxes due on Fund distributions of dividends and capital gains. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who continue to hold their shares. “Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares” also reflects the impact of taxes on capital gain or loss realized upon a sale of shares. It is most relevant to taxpaying shareholders who sell their shares.
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 4.01 | % | | | 2.16 | % | | | 4.66 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 3.78 | | | | 2.01 | | | | 4.57 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 2.85 | | | | 1.85 | | | | 4.07 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class A)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | -1.98 | % | | | 0.96 | % | | | 4.04 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | -2.20 | | | | 0.81 | | | | 3.94 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | -1.06 | | | | 0.83 | | | | 3.51 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 3.19 | % | | | 1.40 | % | | | 3.85 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 3.13 | | | | 1.36 | | | | 3.83 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 2.13 | | | | 1.19 | | | | 3.35 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class C)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 2.19 | % | | | 1.40 | % | | | 3.85 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 2.13 | | | | 1.36 | | | | 3.83 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 1.48 | | | | 1.19 | | | | 3.35 | |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month-end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 3.92 | % | | | 1.54 | % | | | 3.65 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 3.86 | | | | 1.51 | | | | 3.63 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 2.61 | | | | 1.32 | | | | 3.17 | |
Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) (Class B)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Five Years | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | -1.08 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | | 3.65 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | -1.14 | | | | 1.13 | | | | 3.63 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | -0.64 | | | | 0.99 | | | | 3.17 | |
Average Annual Total Returns
(For the periods ended October 31, 2009)
Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) (Class I)
| | | | | | | | |
| | One Year | | Life of Fund |
Return Before Taxes | | | 4.22 | % | | | -15.48 | % |
Return After Taxes on Distributions | | | 3.94 | | | | -16.04 | |
Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares | | | 3.04 | | | | -13.30 | |
Class A, Class B, Class C, and Class I of the Fund commenced investment operations on 12/27/99, 1/18/00, 1/24/00 and 11/30/07, respectively. Returns at Public Offering Price (POP) reflect the deduction of the maximum initial sales charge and applicable CDSC, while Returns at Net Asset Value (NAV) do not.
After-tax returns are calculated using certain assumptions. After-tax returns are calculated using the highest historical individual federal income tax rates and do not reflect the impact of state and local taxes. Actual after-tax returns depend on a shareholder’s tax situation and the actual characterization of distributions and may differ from those shown. After-tax returns are not relevant to shareholders who hold shares in tax-deferred accounts or to shares held by non-taxable entities. Return After Taxes on Distributions for a period may be the same as Return Before Taxes for the same period because no taxable distributions were made during that period, or because the taxable portion of distributions made during the period was insignificant. Return After Taxes on Distributions and Sale of Fund Shares for a period may be greater than or equal to Return After Taxes on Distributions for the same period because of losses realized on the sale of Fund shares.
4
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,191.30 | | | | $6.46 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,191.30 | | | | $6.57 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,186.40 | | | | $10.58 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,192.40 | | | | $5.08 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.30 | | | | $5.95 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.20 | | | | $6.06 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,015.50 | | | | $9.75 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,020.60 | | | | $4.69 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.17% for Class A shares, 1.19% for Class B shares, 1.92% for Class C shares and 0.92% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
5
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Tax-Managed Value Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $1,161,238,818) | | $ | 1,532,204,160 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 6,493,288 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 1,538,697,448 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 9,132,989 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Administration fee | | | 210,191 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 346,537 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 338,426 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 10,028,185 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 1,528,669,263 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 1,529,218,777 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (384,762,051 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 13,247,195 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation from Portfolio | | | 370,965,342 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 1,528,669,263 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 745,815,596 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 50,543,406 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 14.76 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 15.66 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 58,022,631 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 4,142,330 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 14.01 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 186,734,022 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 13,094,239 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 14.26 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 538,097,014 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 36,480,240 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 14.75 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends allocated from Portfolio (net of foreign taxes, $785,323) | | $ | 34,390,144 | | | |
Interest allocated from Portfolio | | | 290,843 | | | |
Securities lending income allocated from Portfolio, net | | | 110,932 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (8,844,346 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 25,947,573 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Administration fee | | $ | 1,994,110 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 1,679,241 | | | |
Class B | | | 281,008 | | | |
Class C | | | 1,832,574 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 555 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 39,634 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 1,233,782 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 24,334 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 211,231 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 99,149 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 37,528 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 7,433,146 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 18,514,427 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (144,962,763 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | 17,299 | | | |
Capital gain distributions received | | | 836,484 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (144,108,980 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 226,390,609 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 80,799 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 226,471,408 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 82,362,428 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 100,876,855 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 18,514,427 | | | $ | 13,452,476 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions, and capital gain distributions received | | | (144,108,980 | ) | | | (197,474,625 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 226,471,408 | | | | (396,272,812 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 100,876,855 | | | $ | (580,294,961 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (8,882,298 | ) | | $ | (8,147,261 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (359,901 | ) | | | (270,151 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (705,225 | ) | | | (564,275 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (5,449,617 | ) | | | (1,733 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (15,397,041 | ) | | $ | (8,983,420 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 376,641,224 | | | $ | 735,258,748 | | | |
Class B | | | 4,701,549 | | | | 4,034,974 | | | |
Class C | | | 24,061,489 | | | | 34,081,205 | | | |
Class I | | | 485,819,184 | | | | 246,290,357 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 6,708,706 | | | | 5,630,048 | | | |
Class B | | | 272,330 | | | | 202,834 | | | |
Class C | | | 507,569 | | | | 403,573 | | | |
Class I | | | 1,661,913 | | | | 1,733 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (424,983,274 | ) | | | (447,294,284 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (23,297,910 | ) | | | (35,682,394 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (56,947,474 | ) | | | (47,758,186 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (177,065,852 | ) | | | (15,180,621 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 41,033,649 | | | | 23,617,530 | | | |
Class B | | | (41,033,649 | ) | | | (23,617,530 | ) | | |
Contingent deferred sales charges | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B | | | 68,209 | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 218,147,663 | | | $ | 479,987,987 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 303,627,477 | | | $ | (109,290,394 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 1,225,041,786 | | | $ | 1,334,332,180 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 1,528,669,263 | | | $ | 1,225,041,786 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 13,247,195 | | | $ | 10,821,931 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009(1) | | | 2008(1) | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 14.400 | | | $ | 21.750 | | | $ | 18.770 | | | $ | 15.920 | | | $ | 13.950 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income | | $ | 0.192 | | | $ | 0.229 | | | $ | 0.202 | | | $ | 0.189 | | | $ | 0.122 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.356 | | | | (7.386 | ) | | | 2.955 | | | | 2.805 | | | | 1.984 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.548 | | | $ | (7.157 | ) | | $ | 3.157 | | | $ | 2.994 | | | $ | 2.106 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | $ | (0.193 | ) | | $ | (0.177 | ) | | $ | (0.144 | ) | | $ | (0.136 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.188 | ) | | $ | (0.193 | ) | | $ | (0.177 | ) | | $ | (0.144 | ) | | $ | (0.136 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 14.760 | | | $ | 14.400 | | | $ | 21.750 | | | $ | 18.770 | | | $ | 15.920 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 4.01 | % | | | (33.19 | )% | | | 16.93 | % | | | 18.92 | % | | | 15.17 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 745,816 | | | $ | 710,258 | | | $ | 737,940 | | | $ | 529,073 | | | $ | 363,527 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4) | | | 1.19 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | | 1.18 | %(5) | | | 1.21 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.46 | % | | | 1.20 | % | | | 1.06 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | | 0.86 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 82 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 40 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Net investment income per share was computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005). |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009(1) | | | 2008(1) | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 13.530 | | | $ | 20.420 | | | $ | 17.630 | | | $ | 14.970 | | | $ | 13.130 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income | | $ | 0.193 | | | $ | 0.091 | | | $ | 0.068 | | | $ | 0.073 | | | $ | 0.018 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.321 | | | | (6.958 | ) | | | 2.761 | | | | 2.618 | | | | 1.862 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.514 | | | $ | (6.867 | ) | | $ | 2.829 | | | $ | 2.691 | | | $ | 1.880 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.044 | ) | | $ | (0.023 | ) | | $ | (0.039 | ) | | $ | (0.031 | ) | | $ | (0.040 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.044 | ) | | $ | (0.023 | ) | | $ | (0.039 | ) | | $ | (0.031 | ) | | $ | (0.040 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Contingent deferred sales charges(1) | | $ | 0.010 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 14.010 | | | $ | 13.530 | | | $ | 20.420 | | | $ | 17.630 | | | $ | 14.970 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 3.92 | % | | | (33.67 | )% | | | 16.07 | % | | | 18.00 | % | | | 14.34 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 58,023 | | | $ | 122,001 | | | $ | 248,127 | | | $ | 250,030 | | | $ | 239,392 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4) | | | 1.29 | % | | | 1.89 | % | | | 1.91 | % | | | 1.93 | %(5) | | | 1.96 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.56 | % | | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.33 | % | | | 0.44 | % | | | 0.13 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 82 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 40 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Net investment income and contingent deferred sales charges per share were computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005). |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009(1) | | | 2008(1) | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 13.870 | | | $ | 20.960 | | | $ | 18.100 | | | $ | 15.370 | | | $ | 13.470 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income | | $ | 0.099 | | | $ | 0.087 | | | $ | 0.062 | | | $ | 0.071 | | | $ | 0.018 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.337 | | | | (7.143 | ) | | | 2.847 | | | | 2.694 | | | | 1.915 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.436 | | | $ | (7.056 | ) | | $ | 2.909 | | | $ | 2.765 | | | $ | 1.933 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.046 | ) | | $ | (0.034 | ) | | $ | (0.049 | ) | | $ | (0.035 | ) | | $ | (0.033 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.046 | ) | | $ | (0.034 | ) | | $ | (0.049 | ) | | $ | (0.035 | ) | | $ | (0.033 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 14.260 | | | $ | 13.870 | | | $ | 20.960 | | | $ | 18.100 | | | $ | 15.370 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(2) | | | 3.19 | % | | | (33.72 | )% | | | 16.10 | % | | | 18.02 | % | | | 14.37 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 186,734 | | | $ | 218,320 | | | $ | 348,265 | | | $ | 297,473 | | | $ | 246,593 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(3)(4) | | | 1.94 | % | | | 1.91 | % | | | 1.91 | % | | | 1.93 | %(5) | | | 1.96 | %(5) | | |
Net investment income | | | 0.78 | % | | | 0.47 | % | | | 0.32 | % | | | 0.43 | % | | | 0.12 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 82 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 40 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Net investment income per share was computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(3) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(4) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(5) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005). |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 14.410 | | | $ | 20.970 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.205 | | | $ | 0.224 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.366 | | | | (6.551 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.571 | | | $ | (6.327 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.231 | ) | | $ | (0.233 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.231 | ) | | $ | (0.233 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 14.750 | | | $ | 14.410 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 4.22 | % | | | (30.53 | )%(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 538,097 | | | $ | 174,464 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 0.94 | % | | | 0.91 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.53 | % | | | 1.36 | %(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 82 | % | | | 84 | %(8) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, November 30, 2007, to October 31, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
|
(8) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers four classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income and losses, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Tax-Managed Value Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (92.9% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income tax is necessary. The Fund also seeks to avoid payment of federal excise tax.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $381,876,055 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2010 ($43,295,557), October 31, 2016 ($193,115,002) and October 31, 2017 ($145,465,496).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
12
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make at least one distribution annually (normally in December) of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 15,397,041 | | | $ | 8,983,420 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $710,729, accumulated undistributed net investment income was decreased by $692,122 and paid-in capital was decreased by $18,607 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for distributions from real estate investment trusts (REITs), foreign currency gain (loss) and non-deductible expenses. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | | $ 13,596,287 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | | $(381,876,055) | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | $ 367,730,254 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, partnership allocations, investments in REITs and investments in partnerships.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
The administration fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for administrative services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $1,994,110. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report. EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $65,944 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $44,090 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund
13
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $1,679,241 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 5% and 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class B and Class C shares sold, respectively, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of each respective class, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by each respective class. Such payments were discontinued during portions of the year ended October 31, 2009 with respect to Class B. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $78,668 and $1,374,430 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.10% and 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares, respectively. At October 31, 2009, the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class C Plan was approximately $23,800,000. There were no Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Class B Plan at October 31, 2009.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $202,340 and $458,144 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within six years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 5% in the case of redemptions in the first and second year after purchase, declining one percentage point each subsequent year. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class B and Class C Plans. CDSCs received on Class B and Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $3,000, $67,000 and $17,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively. In addition, $68,209 of CDSCs were paid by Class B shareholders directly to the Fund for days when no Uncovered Distribution Charges existed.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $642,310,893 and $445,185,421, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 29,818,796 | | | | 38,743,553 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 524,527 | | | | 263,579 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (32,326,321 | ) | | | (24,845,762 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 3,197,865 | | | | 1,246,356 | | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 1,214,867 | | | | 15,407,726 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
14
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 390,397 | | | | 228,065 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 22,414 | | | | 10,046 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (1,916,221 | ) | | | (2,045,593 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (3,372,227 | ) | | | (1,323,839 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (4,875,637 | ) | | | (3,131,321 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,904,736 | | | | 1,855,880 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 40,801 | | | | 19,487 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (4,593,481 | ) | | | (2,751,581 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (2,647,944 | ) | | | (876,214 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class I | | 2009 | | | 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 36,720,245 | | | | 13,008,304 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 130,244 | | | | 81 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (12,477,883 | ) | | | (900,751 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 24,372,606 | | | | 12,107,634 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class I commenced operations on November 30, 2007. |
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 18, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
15
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust
and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed
Value Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 18, 2009
16
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of qualified dividend income for individuals and the dividends received deduction for corporations.
Qualified Dividend Income. The Fund designates $32,349,330, or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
Dividends Received Deduction. Corporate shareholders are generally entitled to take the dividends received deduction on the portion of the Fund’s dividend distribution that qualifies under tax law. For the Fund’s fiscal 2009 ordinary income dividends, 100% qualifies for the corporate dividends received deduction.
17
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 98.9% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense — 3.4% |
|
General Dynamics Corp. | | | 400,000 | | | $ | 25,080,000 | | | |
United Technologies Corp. | | | 500,000 | | | | 30,725,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 55,805,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverages — 1.2% |
|
PepsiCo, Inc. | | | 325,000 | | | $ | 19,678,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 19,678,750 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Biotechnology — 0.7% |
|
Amgen, Inc.(1) | | | 225,000 | | | $ | 12,089,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,089,250 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets — 3.0% |
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | | | 219,725 | | | $ | 37,390,603 | | | |
Northern Trust Corp. | | | 225,000 | | | | 11,306,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 48,696,853 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 0.9% |
|
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 15,426,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,426,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 6.1% |
|
Fifth Third Bancorp | | | 875,000 | | | $ | 7,822,500 | | | |
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | | | 630,000 | | | | 30,832,200 | | | |
U.S. Bancorp | | | 675,000 | | | | 15,673,500 | | | |
Wells Fargo & Co. | | | 1,675,000 | | | | 46,096,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 100,424,200 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies — 1.5% |
|
Waste Management, Inc. | | | 825,000 | | | $ | 24,651,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 24,651,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Communications Equipment — 1.3% |
|
Cisco Systems, Inc.(1) | | | 575,000 | | | $ | 13,138,750 | | | |
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Class B | | | 800,000 | | | | 8,358,267 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 21,497,017 | | | |
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals — 3.5% |
|
Hewlett-Packard Co. | | | 700,000 | | | $ | 33,222,000 | | | |
International Business Machines Corp. | | | 200,000 | | | | 24,122,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 57,344,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance — 2.4% |
|
American Express Co. | | | 400,000 | | | $ | 13,936,000 | | | |
Capital One Financial Corp. | | | 720,000 | | | | 26,352,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 40,288,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services — 5.0% |
|
Bank of America Corp. | | | 2,500,000 | | | $ | 36,450,000 | | | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | | 1,100,000 | | | | 45,947,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 82,397,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 3.4% |
|
AT&T, Inc. | | | 1,400,000 | | | $ | 35,938,000 | | | |
Verizon Communications, Inc. | | | 675,000 | | | | 19,973,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 55,911,250 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 2.3% |
|
Entergy Corp. | | | 175,000 | | | $ | 13,426,000 | | | |
Exelon Corp. | | | 300,000 | | | | 14,088,000 | | | |
FPL Group, Inc. | | | 200,000 | | | | 9,820,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 37,334,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electrical Equipment — 0.5% |
|
Emerson Electric Co. | | | 225,000 | | | $ | 8,493,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,493,750 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Energy Equipment & Services — 2.4% |
|
Halliburton Co. | | | 700,000 | | | $ | 20,447,000 | | | |
Transocean, Ltd.(1) | | | 225,000 | | | | 18,879,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 39,326,750 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food & Staples Retailing — 2.0% |
|
CVS Caremark Corp. | | | 450,000 | | | $ | 15,885,000 | | | |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | | | 340,000 | | | | 16,891,200 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 32,776,200 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements18
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Food Products — 2.0% |
|
Nestle SA | | | 700,000 | | | $ | 32,551,091 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 32,551,091 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 1.2% |
|
Boston Scientific Corp.(1) | | | 1,250,000 | | | $ | 10,150,000 | | | |
Covidien PLC | | | 225,378 | | | | 9,492,921 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 19,642,921 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 0.5% |
|
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | | | 345,000 | | | $ | 8,952,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,952,750 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 2.8% |
|
Carnival Corp. | | | 365,000 | | | $ | 10,628,800 | | | |
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 600,000 | | | | 35,166,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 45,794,800 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Conglomerates — 1.6% |
|
General Electric Co. | | | 1,200,000 | | | $ | 17,112,000 | | | |
Tyco International, Ltd. | | | 300,000 | | | | 10,065,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 27,177,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 5.1% |
|
ACE, Ltd.(1) | | | 215,750 | | | $ | 11,080,920 | | | |
Lincoln National Corp. | | | 500,000 | | | | 11,915,000 | | | |
MetLife, Inc. | | | 600,000 | | | | 20,418,000 | | | |
Prudential Financial, Inc. | | | 700,000 | | | | 31,661,000 | | | |
Travelers Companies, Inc. (The) | | | 170,000 | | | | 8,464,300 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 83,539,220 | | | |
|
|
|
|
IT Services — 1.6% |
|
MasterCard, Inc., Class A | | | 80,000 | | | $ | 17,521,600 | | | |
Western Union Co. | | | 500,000 | | | | 9,085,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 26,606,600 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences Tools & Services — 0.7% |
|
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.(1) | | | 250,000 | | | $ | 11,250,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,250,000 | | | |
|
|
|
Machinery — 1.8% |
|
Caterpillar, Inc. | | | 175,000 | | | $ | 9,635,500 | | | |
Deere & Co. | | | 200,000 | | | | 9,110,000 | | | |
PACCAR, Inc. | | | 275,000 | | | | 10,287,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 29,033,250 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Media — 0.6% |
|
Walt Disney Co. (The) | | | 365,000 | | | $ | 9,990,050 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,990,050 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 3.0% |
|
BHP Billiton, Ltd. ADR | | | 300,000 | | | $ | 19,674,000 | | | |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | | | 275,000 | | | | 20,174,000 | | | |
Nucor Corp. | | | 250,000 | | | | 9,962,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 49,810,500 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multi-Utilities — 1.3% |
|
Dominion Resources, Inc. | | | 300,000 | | | $ | 10,227,000 | | | |
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. | | | 350,000 | | | | 10,430,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 20,657,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multiline Retail — 1.1% |
|
Target Corp. | | | 380,000 | | | $ | 18,403,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 18,403,400 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 17.0% |
|
Anadarko Petroleum Corp. | | | 650,000 | | | $ | 39,604,500 | | | |
Apache Corp. | | | 350,000 | | | | 32,942,000 | | | |
Chevron Corp. | | | 575,000 | | | | 44,010,500 | | | |
ConocoPhillips | | | 200,000 | | | | 10,036,000 | | | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | | | 600,000 | | | | 43,002,000 | | | |
Hess Corp. | | | 575,000 | | | | 31,475,500 | | | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | | | 550,000 | | | | 41,734,000 | | | |
Peabody Energy Corp. | | | 250,000 | | | | 9,897,500 | | | |
Total SA ADR | | | 300,000 | | | | 18,021,000 | | | |
XTO Energy, Inc. | | | 250,000 | | | | 10,390,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 281,113,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals — 5.7% |
|
Abbott Laboratories | | | 525,000 | | | $ | 26,549,250 | | | |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | | | 500,000 | | | | 10,900,000 | | | |
See notes to financial statements19
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Pharmaceuticals (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Pfizer, Inc. | | | 2,000,000 | | | $ | 34,060,000 | | | |
Schering-Plough Corp. | | | 800,000 | | | | 22,560,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 94,069,250 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) — 2.8% |
|
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 13,756,000 | | | |
Boston Properties, Inc. | | | 150,000 | | | | 9,115,500 | | | |
Equity Residential | | | 340,000 | | | | 9,819,200 | | | |
Vornado Realty Trust | | | 240,000 | | | | 14,294,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 46,985,100 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Road & Rail — 1.6% |
|
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. | | | 350,000 | | | $ | 26,362,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 26,362,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 1.4% |
|
Applied Materials, Inc. | | | 725,000 | | | $ | 8,845,000 | | | |
Intel Corp. | | | 725,000 | | | | 13,854,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 22,699,750 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Software — 1.7% |
|
Microsoft Corp. | | | 700,000 | | | $ | 19,411,000 | | | |
Oracle Corp. | | | 400,000 | | | | 8,440,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 27,851,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail — 3.9% |
|
Best Buy Co., Inc. | | | 850,000 | | | $ | 32,453,000 | | | |
Staples, Inc. | | | 925,000 | | | | 20,072,500 | | | |
TJX Companies, Inc. (The) | | | 330,000 | | | | 12,325,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 64,851,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods — 1.2% |
|
NIKE, Inc., Class B | | | 330,000 | | | $ | 20,519,400 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 20,519,400 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 0.7% |
|
Vodafone Group PLC ADR | | | 550,000 | | | $ | 12,204,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 12,204,500 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $1,227,960,066) | | $ | 1,632,202,602 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 1.1% |
|
| | Interest
| | | | | | |
Description | | (000’s omitted) | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(2) | | $ | 17,930 | | | $ | 17,930,003 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 17,930,003 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $17,930,003) | | $ | 17,930,003 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 100.0% | | |
(identified cost $1,245,890,069) | | $ | 1,650,132,605 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.0% | | $ | (807,016 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 1,649,325,589 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
ADR - American Depositary Receipt
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(2) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements20
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $1,227,960,066) | | $ | 1,632,202,602 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $17,930,003) | | | 17,930,003 | | | |
Cash | | | 688,049 | | | |
Dividends receivable | | | 2,158,696 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 27,923,542 | | | |
Tax reclaims receivable | | | 793,385 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 1,681,696,277 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 31,228,194 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 931,046 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 4,208 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 207,240 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 32,370,688 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 1,649,325,589 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 1,244,989,937 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 404,335,652 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 1,649,325,589 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends (net of foreign taxes, $846,791) | | $ | 37,214,973 | | | |
Securities lending income, net | | | 120,618 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 316,146 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (184,782 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 37,466,955 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 8,813,913 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 51,784 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 350,363 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 84,980 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 66,340 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 9,367,380 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 1 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 1 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 9,367,379 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 28,099,576 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (159,506,070 | ) | | |
Investment transactions allocated from affiliated investment | | | (399,221 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | 18,492 | | | |
Capital gain distributions received | | | 905,193 | | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (158,981,606 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 241,895,538 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 86,546 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 241,982,084 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 83,000,478 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 111,100,054 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements21
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 28,099,576 | | | $ | 27,080,353 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions, and capital gain distributions received | | | (158,981,606 | ) | | | (221,801,106 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 241,982,084 | | | | (439,284,824 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 111,100,054 | | | $ | (634,005,577 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 643,314,732 | | | $ | 1,026,614,787 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (462,369,238 | ) | | | (556,492,962 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from capital transactions | | $ | 180,945,494 | | | $ | 470,121,825 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 292,045,548 | | | $ | (163,883,752 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 1,357,280,041 | | | $ | 1,521,163,793 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 1,649,325,589 | | | $ | 1,357,280,041 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements22
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(2) | | | 0.67 | % | | | 0.66 | % | | | 0.66 | % | | | 0.67 | %(1) | | | 0.68 | %(1) | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.96 | % | | | 1.71 | % | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.67 | % | | | 1.40 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 82 | % | | | 84 | % | | | 14 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 40 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 4.55 | % | | | (32.85 | )% | | | 17.51 | % | | | 19.53 | % | | | 15.76 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 1,649,326 | | | $ | 1,357,280 | | | $ | 1,521,164 | | | $ | 1,212,996 | | | $ | 946,075 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | The investment adviser waived a portion of its investment adviser fee (equal to less than 0.005% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005). |
|
(2) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
See notes to financial statements23
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to achieve long-term, after-tax returns by investing in a diversified portfolio of value stocks. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund held an interest of 92.9% and 7.1%, respectively, in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management) and Eaton Vance Cash Collateral Fund, LLC (Cash Collateral Fund), affiliated investment companies managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR) and Eaton Vance Management (EVM), respectively. Cash Management and Cash Collateral Fund normally value their investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique in accordance with Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management and Cash Collateral Fund may value their investment securities based on available market quotations provided by a third party pricing service.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
24
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. However, if the ex-dividend date has passed, certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as the Portfolio is informed of the ex-dividend date. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends and capital gains have been provided for in accordance with the Portfolio’s understanding of the applicable countries’ tax rules and rates. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
G Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
H Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement and subsequent fee reduction agreement between the Portfolio and BMR, the fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.65% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets up to $500 million, 0.625% from $500 million up to $1 billion, 0.600% from $1 billion up to $2 billion and at reduced rates as average net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. The fee reduction cannot be terminated without the consent of the Trustees and shareholders. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $8,989,348 of which $175,435 was allocated from Cash Management and $8,813,913 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the
25
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.63% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $1,406,750,645 and $1,140,580,177, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 1,249,798,663 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 405,782,200 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (5,448,258 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 400,333,942 | | | |
|
|
The net unrealized appreciation on foreign currency transactions at October 31, 2009 on a federal income tax basis was $93,116.
5 Line of Credit
The Portfolio participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Portfolio solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Portfolio based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Portfolio did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
6 Securities Lending Agreement
The Portfolio has established a securities lending agreement with SSBT as securities lending agent in which the Portfolio lends portfolio securities to qualified borrowers in exchange for collateral consisting of either cash or U.S. Government securities in an amount at least equal to the market value of the securities on loan. Cash collateral is invested in Cash Collateral Fund. The Portfolio earns interest on the amount invested in Cash Collateral Fund but it must pay (and at times receive from) the broker a loan rebate fee computed as a varying percentage of the collateral received. The net loan rebate fee paid by the Portfolio amounted to $42,721 for the year ended October 31, 2009. In the event of counterparty default, the Portfolio is subject to potential loss if it is delayed or prevented from exercising its right to dispose of the collateral. The Portfolio bears risk in the event that invested collateral is not sufficient to meet obligations due on loans. At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no securities on loan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio realized losses of $399,221 on its investment of cash collateral in connection with securities lending.
7 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
26
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer Discretionary | | $ | 159,558,650 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 159,558,650 | | | |
Consumer Staples | | | 52,454,950 | | | | 32,551,091 | | | | — | | | | 85,006,041 | | | |
Energy | | | 320,439,750 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 320,439,750 | | | |
Financials | | | 402,330,373 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 402,330,373 | | | |
Health Care | | | 146,004,171 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 146,004,171 | | | |
Industrials | | | 171,522,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 171,522,000 | | | |
Information Technology | | | 147,640,100 | | | | 8,358,267 | | | | — | | | | 155,998,367 | | | |
Materials | | | 65,236,500 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 65,236,500 | | | |
Telecommunication Services | | | 68,115,750 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 68,115,750 | | | |
Utilities | | | 57,991,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 57,991,000 | | | |
|
|
Total Common Stocks | | $ | 1,591,293,244 | | | $ | 40,909,358 | * | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,632,202,602 | | | |
|
|
Short-Term Investments | | $ | 17,930,003 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 17,930,003 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 1,609,223,247 | | | $ | 40,909,358 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,650,132,605 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
* | | Includes foreign equity securities whose values were adjusted to reflect market trading that occurred after the close of trading in their applicable foreign markets. |
The Portfolio held no investments or other financial instruments as of October 31, 2008 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs.
8 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 18, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
27
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Tax-Managed Value Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Tax-Managed Value Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Tax-Managed Value Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 18, 2009
28
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
29
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Tax-Managed Value Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), the portfolio in which Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund (the “Fund”) invests, with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio. The Board specifically noted the Adviser’s in-house equity research capabilities and experience managing funds that seek to maximize after-tax returns. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the
30
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the Fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees, including administrative fees, and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Portfolio, the Fund and all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Portfolio and the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Portfolio and other advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and the Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the Portfolio advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund and Portfolio to continue to share such benefits equitably.
31
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Tax-Managed Value Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVM. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
32
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Interested Trustee (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Of the Trust since 1998 and of the Portfolio since 2001 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael R. Mach 7/15/47 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2001 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 20 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust and President of the Portfolio | | Vice President of the Trust since 2001 and President of the Portfolio since 2002 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
33
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
34
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Tax-Managed Value Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Administrator of Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value FundEaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Annual Report October 31, 2009 EATON VANCE FLOATING-RATE ADVANTAGE FUND |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC��s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75847/7584765c0928698e8ec553676b6823b5e9c828c0" alt="(PHOTO OF SCOTT H. PAGE)"
Scott H. Page, CFA
Co-Portfolio Manager
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8263b/8263b2041bfdedbcd010d8f27fe82e4a58e7dd33" alt="(PHOTO OF CRAIG P. RUSS)"
Craig P. Russ
Co-Portfolio Manager
Economic and Market Conditions
• | | During the year ending October 31, 2009, global credit markets experienced unprecedented volatility in the early months of the period but staged a remarkable turnaround beginning in January 2009. In the first two months of the period, there was little doubt that a recession would bring higher default rates; but it was difficult to reconcile bank loan and high-yield bond prices with market fundamentals. By the turn of the New Year, however, the markets began to rebound as credit spreads tightened from record levels and investors returned to the credit markets. |
• | | The loan market, as measured by the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index (the Index) returned 46.90% for the first 10 months of 2009, the highest 10-month performance in the history of the asset class. For the fiscal year, the Index returned 30.44%.1 Performance was driven by a combination of technical factors, which improved the market’s demand and supply picture. On the supply side, limited new loan issuance and a contraction of the existing supply through loan repayments reduced the available universe of purchasable loans. Matched with little selling activity and modest but steady inflows, loan prices improved significantly. More significant investor flows into the high-yield bond market also contributed to the improvement in the bank loans. Increased high-yield bond issuance contributed to meaningful bank loan repayments, which lowered the available supply of loans and provided cash to bank loan managers. In addition, direct crossover buying into the asset class by high-yield bond managers bolstered demand. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Management Discussion
• | | The Fund’s2 investment objective is to provide a high level of current income. The Fund invests primarily in senior floating-rate loans of domestic and foreign borrowers. In managing the Fund, the investment adviser seeks to invest in a portfolio of senior loans that it believes will be less volatile over time than the general loan market. |
|
• | | The Fund’s investments included 381 borrowers in 39 industries as of October 31, 2009, with an average loan size of 0.26% of total investments, and no industry constituted more than 9.0% of total investments. Health care, business equipment and services and cable and satellite television were among the top industry weightings. The Fund’s loans were primarily senior, secured loans to companies with average revenues exceeding $1 billion. |
|
• | | The Fund’s larger, higher-quality loans helped performance in the earlier part of 2009 as these loans were the first to benefit from price recovery. Management’s use of leverage was also a significant factor in the Fund’s outperformance of the Index, as its borrowings magnified the strong credit market rally. The past six months witnessed a “junk rally,” with the market’s lowest-quality loans skyrocketing back to life. As a result, the Fund’s relative underweight to lower-quality loans, including second-lien loans and those rated CCC or below, detracted slightly from relative performance in the second half of the period. |
Total Return Performance 10/31/08 — 10/31/09
| | | | |
Advisers Class3 | | | 37.38 | % |
Class A3 | | | 37.56 | |
Class B3 | | | 36.99 | |
Class C3 | | | 36.67 | |
Class I3 | | | 37.70 | |
S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index1 | | | 30.44 | |
See page 3 for more performance information.
| | |
|
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return reflects changes in value of the loans constituting the Index and accrual of interest and does not reflect the commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the loans represented in the Index. |
|
2 | | The Fund currently invests in a separately registered investment company, Senior Debt Portfolio (the Portfolio), with the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. References to investments and borrowings are to the Portfolio’s holdings and borrowings. |
|
3 | | These returns do not include the 2.25% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B or Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the performance would be lower. Advisers Class and Class I shares are offered to investors at net asset value. |
1
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | The Fund had a 9.3% exposure to European loans as of October 31, 2009. The Fund’s involvement in the European leveraged loan market represented further opportunity for diversification, and while this market was affected slightly more than the U.S. bank loan market by the credit market turmoil, we believe it offers attractive appreciation opportunity at current price levels. |
|
• | | In terms of industry sectors, a relative overweight to the cable television; leisure goods, activities and movies; and business equipment and services industries benefited relative performance. Detractors included underweights to the automotive and lodging and casino industries. The Fund’s diversification was an important risk mitigator during the fiscal year. |
|
• | | As concerns about inflation and the uncertainty of the potential interest-rate impact of historic stimulus financing persists, we believe the floating-rate asset class remains attractive, especially relative to duration-exposed fixed-income alternatives. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Portfolio’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
Top 10 Holdings1
By total investments
| | | | |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. | | | 1.4 | % |
UPC Broadband Holding B.V. | | | 1.3 | |
HCA, Inc. | | | 1.2 | |
Community Health Systems, Inc. | | | 1.2 | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc. | | | 1.1 | |
Univision Communications Inc. | | | 1.1 | |
Rite Aid Corp. | | | 1.1 | |
Intelsat Corp. | | | 1.0 | |
Cequel Communications, LLC | | | 1.0 | |
Charter Communications Operating, LLC | | | 1.0 | |
| | |
1 | | Reflects the Portfolio’s investments as of 10/31/09. Holdings are shown as a percentage of the Portfolio’s total investments. |
Top Five Industries2
By total investments
| | | | |
Health Care | | | 8.7 | % |
Business Equipment and Services | | | 7.7 | |
Cable and Satellite Television | | | 7.6 | |
Publishing | | | 6.3 | |
Chemicals and Plastics | | | 5.8 | |
| | |
|
2 | | Reflects the Portfolio’s investments as of 10/31/09. Industries are shown as a percentage of the Portfolio’s total investments. |
Credit Quality Ratings for Total Loan Investments3
By total loan investments
| | | | |
Baa | | | 1.9 | % |
Ba | | | 37.5 | |
B | | | 34.0 | |
Ca | | | 0.8 | |
Caa | | | 5.4 | |
Defaulted | | | 8.8 | |
Non-Rated4 | | | 11.6 | |
| | |
|
3 | | Credit Quality ratings are those provided by Moody’s Investor Services, Inc., a nationally recognized bond rating service. Reflects the Portfolio’s total loan investments as of 10/31/09. Although the investment adviser considers ratings when making investment decisions, it performs its own credit and investment analysis and does not rely primarily on the ratings assigned by the rating services. Credit quality can change from time to time, and recently issued credit ratings may not fully reflect the actual risks posed by a particular security or the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. |
|
4 | | Certain loans in which the Portfolio invests are not rated by a rating agency. In management’s opinion, such securities are comparable to securities rated by a rating agency in the categories listed above. |
2
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class B of the Fund with that of the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index, an unmanaged loan market index. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in Class B of the Fund and the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Advisers | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EVFAX | | EAFAX | | EBFHX | | ECFAX | | EIFAX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
One year | | | 37.38 | % | | | 37.56 | % | | | 36.99 | % | | | 36.67 | % | | | 37.70 | % |
Five years | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | | 2.66 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
10 years | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | | 3.26 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 5.30 | | | | 5.30 | | | | 5.18 | | | | 4.78 | | | | 5.55 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) | | | | | | | | |
One year | | | 37.38 | % | | | 34.38 | % | | | 33.99 | % | | | 35.67 | % | | | 37.70 | % |
Five years | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | | 2.66 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
10 years | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | | | | 3.26 | | | | N.A. | | | | N.A. | |
Life of Fund† | | | 5.30 | | | | 3.84 | | | | 5.18 | | | | 4.78 | | | | 5.55 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates: — Advisers Class: 3/15/08; Class A: 3/17/08; Class B: 8/4/89; Class C: 3/15/08; Class I: 3/15/08. |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns at net asset value do not include the 2.25% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charges (CDSC) for Class B or Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the performance would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 2.25% sales charge. Advisers Class and Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class B reflect applicable CDSC based on the following schedule: 3% — 1st year; 2.5% — 2nd year; 2% — 3rd year; 1% — 4th year. 1-year SEC returns for Class C reflect 1% CDSC. Class A, Advisers Class and Class I shares are subject to a 1% redemption fee if redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of the settlement of the purchase. Performance for periods prior to 3/15/08 reflects performance of Eaton Vance Prime Rate Reserves. The Fund is the successor to Eaton Vance Prime Rate Reserves. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | Advisers | | | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class | | Class A | | Class B | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 2.13 | % | | | 2.13 | % | | | 2.53 | % | | | 2.64 | % | | | 1.88 | % |
| | |
|
2 | | From the Fund’s prospectus dated 3/1/09. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c7cd8/c7cd84c3505b7d446022504fdb4080f52fac5476" alt="(PERFORMANCE GRAPH)"
| | |
* | | Source: Morningstar Direct. Class B of the Fund commenced operations on 8/4/89. |
|
A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class A on 3/17/08, Class C on 3/15/08, Class I on 3/15/08 and Advisers Class on 3/15/08 would have been valued at $10,875 ($10,631 including maximum sales charge), $10,789, $10,918 and $10,875, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect the expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
3
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,286.80 | | | | $14.24 | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,288.40 | | | | $14.07 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,285.50 | | | | $15.90 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,284.40 | | | | $16.87 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,288.30 | | | | $12.69 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,012.80 | | | | $12.53 | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,012.90 | | | | $12.38 | | | |
Class B | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,011.30 | | | | $13.99 | | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,010.40 | | | | $14.85 | | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,014.10 | | | | $11.17 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 2.47% for Advisers Class shares, 2.44% for Class A shares, 2.76% for Class B shares, 2.93% for Class C shares and 2.20% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. The Example reflects the expenses of both the Fund and the Portfolio. | |
4
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investment in Senior Debt Portfolio, at value (identified cost, $1,433,249,128) | | $ | 1,263,527,997 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 1,125,817 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 1,264,653,814 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | $ | 3,390,565 | | | |
Distributions payable | | | 1,452,603 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 535,758 | | | |
Administration fee | | | 107,458 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 42 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 364,651 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 5,851,077 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 1,258,802,737 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 1,851,639,051 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss from Portfolio | | | (429,440,640 | ) | | |
Accumulated net investment income | | | 6,325,457 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation from Portfolio | | | (169,721,131 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 1,258,802,737 | | | |
|
|
|
Advisers Class Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 34,172,680 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 3,448,996 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.91 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 528,054,153 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 53,289,766 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.91 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 97.75 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 10.14 | | | |
|
|
|
Class B Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 121,235,867 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 12,211,442 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.93 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 550,651,537 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 55,602,496 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.90 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 24,688,500 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 2,490,201 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.91 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $100,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest allocated from Portfolio | | $ | 87,386,142 | | | |
Expenses allocated from Portfolio | | | (22,520,756 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income from Portfolio | | $ | 64,865,386 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Administration fee | | $ | 1,082,547 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | 77,021 | | | |
Class A | | | 1,108,786 | | | |
Class B | | | 726,592 | | | |
Class C | | | 3,542,607 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 502 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 49,122 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 1,458,392 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 53,189 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 300,620 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 89,697 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 20,499 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 8,509,574 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 56,355,812 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) from Portfolio |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (124,832,220 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (14,341,381 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (139,173,601 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 434,266,218 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (2,349,085 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 431,917,133 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 292,743,532 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 349,099,344 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | * |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 56,355,812 | | | $ | 85,590,737 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (139,173,601 | ) | | | (17,842,295 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 431,917,133 | | | | (459,387,115 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 349,099,344 | | | $ | (391,638,673 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | $ | (1,628,046 | ) | | $ | (995,935 | ) | | |
Class A | | | (23,864,460 | ) | | | (16,194,549 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (6,295,340 | ) | | | (34,565,370 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (23,489,681 | ) | | | (21,425,668 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (824,669 | ) | | | (827,902 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | — | | | | (119,637 | ) | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | (1,945,383 | ) | | |
Class B | | | — | | | | (4,152,193 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (2,573,775 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (99,453 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (56,102,196 | ) | | $ | (82,899,865 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | $ | 14,369,337 | | | $ | 9,129,233 | | | |
Class A | | | 21,758,243 | | | | 56,985,769 | | | |
Class B | | | 2,477,558 | | | | 9,777,200 | | | |
Class C | | | 21,836,541 | | | | 7,957,428 | | | |
Class I | | | 7,819,465 | | | | 897,901 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | 1,361,149 | | | | 762,435 | | | |
Class A | | | 14,024,682 | | | | 10,442,266 | | | |
Class B | | | 3,831,567 | | | | 20,026,914 | | | |
Class C | | | 16,768,425 | | | | 16,706,127 | | | |
Class I | | | 349,645 | | | | 488,897 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | (18,417,318 | ) | | | (10,722,609 | ) | | |
Class A | | | (104,408,032 | ) | | | (73,490,146 | ) | | |
Class B | | | (35,418,922 | ) | | | (279,290,004 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (100,839,722 | ) | | | (165,335,095 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (1,205,437 | ) | | | (13,372,559 | ) | | |
Net asset value of shares exchanged | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 29,897,621 | | | | 605,354,584 | | | |
Class B | | | (29,897,621 | ) | | | (605,354,584 | ) | | |
Issued in connection with tax-free reorganization (see Note 8) | | | | | | | | | | |
Advisers Class | | | — | | | | 34,997,278 | | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | 781,241,870 | | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | 29,992,032 | | | |
Redemption fees | | | 8,137 | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (155,684,682 | ) | | $ | 437,194,937 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 137,312,466 | | | $ | (37,343,601 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | * |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 1,121,490,271 | | | $ | 1,158,833,872 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 1,258,802,737 | | | $ | 1,121,490,271 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 6,325,457 | | | $ | (307,675 | ) | | |
|
|
| |
* | Information prior to the close of business on March 14, 2008 reflects the historical financial results of Eaton Vance Prime Rate Reserves prior to its reorganization. |
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Advisers Class |
| | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.620 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.435 | | | $ | 0.395 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 2.289 | | | | (2.405 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 2.724 | | | $ | (2.010 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.434 | ) | | $ | (0.330 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.040 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.434 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(2) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.910 | | | $ | 7.620 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 37.38 | % | | | (20.84 | )%(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 34,173 | | | $ | 27,960 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees(6)(7) | | | 1.29 | % | | | 1.17 | %(8) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 1.32 | % | | | 0.96 | %(8) | | |
Total expenses(6) | | | 2.61 | % | | | 2.13 | %(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.36 | % | | | 6.25 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 32 | % | | | 7 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class commenced operations on March 15, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Rounds to less than $0.001. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
|
(9) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.610 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.439 | | | $ | 0.388 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 2.294 | | | | (2.408 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 2.733 | | | $ | (2.020 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.433 | ) | | $ | (0.330 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.040 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.433 | ) | | $ | (0.370 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(2) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.910 | | | $ | 7.610 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 37.56 | % | | | (20.94 | )%(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 528,054 | | | $ | 444,144 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees(6)(7) | | | 1.29 | % | | | 1.16 | %(8) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 1.32 | % | | | 0.97 | %(8) | | |
Total expenses(6) | | | 2.61 | % | | | 2.13 | %(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.42 | % | | | 6.23 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 32 | % | | | 7 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class commenced operations on March 17, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Rounds to less than $0.001. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
|
(9) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class B(1) |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | Year Ended November 30, | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | October 31, 2007(2) | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.630 | | | $ | 11.180 | | | $ | 11.500 | | | $ | 11.500 | | | $ | 11.490 | | | $ | 11.240 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income | | $ | 0.426 | (3) | | $ | 0.662 | (3) | | $ | 0.670 | (3) | | $ | 0.667 | (3) | | $ | 0.481 | (3) | | $ | 0.345 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 2.279 | | | | (3.601 | ) | | | (0.307 | ) | | | 0.008 | | | | 0.014 | | | | 0.249 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 2.705 | | | $ | (2.939 | ) | | $ | 0.363 | | | $ | 0.675 | | | $ | 0.495 | | | $ | 0.594 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.405 | ) | | $ | (0.545 | ) | | $ | (0.683 | ) | | $ | (0.675 | ) | | $ | (0.485 | ) | | $ | (0.344 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.066 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.405 | ) | | $ | (0.611 | ) | | $ | (0.683 | ) | | $ | (0.675 | ) | | $ | (0.485 | ) | | $ | (0.344 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(3) | | $ | 0.000 | (4) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.930 | | | $ | 7.630 | | | $ | 11.180 | | | $ | 11.500 | | | $ | 11.500 | | | $ | 11.490 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(5) | | | 36.99 | % | | | (27.45 | )% | | | 3.23 | %(10) | | | 6.02 | % | | | 4.41 | % | | | 5.30 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 121,236 | | | $ | 151,321 | | | $ | 1,158,834 | | | $ | 1,273,866 | | | $ | 1,428,366 | | | $ | 1,636,855 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees(6)(7) | | | 1.64 | % | | | 1.51 | % | | | 1.40 | %(8) | | | 1.32 | % | | | 1.33 | % | | | 1.31 | % | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 1.32 | % | | | 1.02 | % | | | 0.70 | %(8) | | | 0.01 | % | | | 0.00 | %(9) | | | 0.00 | %(9) | | |
Total expenses(6) | | | 2.96 | % | | | 2.53 | % | | | 2.10 | %(8) | | | 1.33 | % | | | 1.33 | % | | | 1.31 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.34 | % | | | 6.37 | % | | | 6.39 | %(8) | | | 5.79 | % | | | 4.18 | % | | | 3.02 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 32 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 55 | %(10) | | | 51 | % | | | 65 | % | | | 87 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Information prior to the close of business on March 14, 2008 reflects the historical financial results of Eaton Vance Prime Rate Reserves prior to its reorganization. |
|
(2) | | For the eleven months ended October 31, 2007. |
|
(3) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(4) | | Rounds to less than $0.001. |
|
(5) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
|
(9) | | Represents less than 0.01%. |
|
(10) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.620 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.399 | | | $ | 0.362 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 2.280 | | | | (2.400 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 2.679 | | | $ | (2.038 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.399 | ) | | $ | (0.305 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.037 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.399 | ) | | $ | (0.342 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(2) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.900 | | | $ | 7.620 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 36.67 | % | | | (21.06 | )%(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 550,652 | | | $ | 484,551 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees(6)(7) | | | 1.79 | % | | | 1.68 | %(8) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 1.32 | % | | | 0.96 | %(8) | | |
Total expenses(6) | | | 3.11 | % | | | 2.64 | %(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.95 | % | | | 5.74 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 32 | % | | | 7 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class commenced operations on March 15, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Rounds to less than $0.001. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
|
(9) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 7.620 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.461 | | | $ | 0.412 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 2.282 | | | | (2.407 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 2.743 | | | $ | (1.995 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.453 | ) | | $ | (0.344 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | (0.041 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.453 | ) | | $ | (0.385 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(2) | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 9.910 | | | $ | 7.620 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 37.70 | % | | | (20.71 | )%(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 24,688 | | | $ | 13,515 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses excluding interest and fees(6)(7) | | | 1.04 | % | | | 0.92 | %(8) | | |
Interest and fee expense(6) | | | 1.32 | % | | | 0.96 | %(8) | | |
Total expenses(6) | | | 2.36 | % | | | 1.88 | %(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.65 | % | | | 6.51 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover of the Portfolio | | | 32 | % | | | 7 | %(9) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Class commenced operations on March 15, 2008. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Rounds to less than $0.001. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | Includes the Fund’s share of the Portfolio’s allocated expenses. |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
|
(9) | | For the Portfolio’s year ended October 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund offers five classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class B and Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). The Advisers Class and Class I shares are generally sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Class B shares automatically convert to Class A shares eight years after their purchase as described in the Fund’s prospectus. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Net investment income, other than class-specific expenses, is allocated daily to each class of shares based upon the ratio of the value of each class’s paid shares to the total value of all paid shares. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses. The Fund invests all of its investable assets in interests in Senior Debt Portfolio (the Portfolio), a New York trust, having the same investment objective and policies as the Fund. The value of the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio reflects the Fund’s proportionate interest in the net assets of the Portfolio (99.9% at October 31, 2009). The performance of the Fund is directly affected by the performance of the Portfolio. The financial statements of the Portfolio, including the portfolio of investments, are included elsewhere in this report and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s financial statements.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Valuation of securities by the Portfolio is discussed in Note 1A of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements, which are included elsewhere in this report.
B Income — The Fund’s net investment income or loss consists of the Fund’s pro-rata share of the net investment income or loss of the Portfolio, less all actual and accrued expenses of the Fund.
C Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $432,480,210 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2010 ($154,919,765), October 31, 2011 ($86,475,719), October 31, 2012 ($774,702), October 31, 2013 ($704,819), October 31, 2015 ($14,497,995), October 31, 2016 ($124,648,581) and October 31, 2017 ($50,458,629).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s and Predecessor Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
D Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at
12
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
H Redemption Fees — Upon the redemption or exchange of shares by Advisers Class, Class A and Class I shareholders within 90 days of the settlement of purchase, a fee of 1% of the current net asset value of these shares will be assessed and retained by the Fund for the benefit of the remaining shareholders. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in capital.
I Other — Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date basis. Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund declares dividends daily to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are generally paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any) are made at least annually. Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 56,102,196 | | | $ | 74,009,424 | | | |
Tax return of capital | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,890,441 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $283,135,204, accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income was decreased by $8,646,664 and paid-in capital was decreased by $291,781,868 due to expired capital loss carryforwards and differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for mixed straddles, defaulted bonds, foreign currency gain (loss) and swap contracts. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 8,111,973 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (432,480,210 | ) | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (167,015,474 | ) | | |
Other temporary differences | | $ | (1,452,603 | ) | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, defaulted bond interest, partnership allocations, swap contracts and the timing of recognizing distributions to shareholders.
3 Transactions with Affiliates
The administration fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for administrative services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.10% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $1,082,547. The Portfolio has engaged Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of EVM, to render investment advisory services. See Note 2 of the Portfolio’s Notes to Financial Statements which are included elsewhere in this report.
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $65,710 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $9,172 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution
13
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
and service fees from Advisers Class, Class A, Class B and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund and the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect distribution plans for the Advisers Class shares (Advisers Plan) and Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Advisers Plan and the Class A Plan provide that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Advisers Class and Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $77,021 for Advisers Class shares and $1,108,786 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect distribution plans for Class B shares (Class B Plan) and Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class B and Class C Plans require the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.40% and 0.60% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares, respectively, for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $484,395 and $2,834,086 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively, representing 0.40% and 0.60% of the average daily net assets of Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
The Class B and Class C Plans also authorize the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons in amounts not exceeding 0.20% and 0.15% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class B and Class C shares, respectively. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $242,197 and $708,521 for Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) generally is imposed on redemptions of Class B shares made within four years of purchase and on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. The CDSC for Class B shares is imposed at declining rates that begin at 3% in the case of redemptions in the first year of purchase, declining to 2.5% in the second year, 2.0% in the third year, 1.0% in the fourth year and 0.0% thereafter. Class C shares are subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within one year of purchase. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $28,000, $129,000 and $23,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A, Class B and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Investment Transactions
For the year ended October 31, 2009, increases and decreases in the Fund’s investment in the Portfolio aggregated $39,030,192 and $252,416,134, respectively.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
Advisers Class | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 1,907,661 | | | | 1,173,587 | | | |
Issued in connection with the acquisition of Eaton Vance Advisers Senior Floating-Rate Fund | | | — | | | | 3,499,728 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 172,765 | | | | 78,774 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (2,301,200 | ) | | | (1,082,319 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (220,774 | ) | | | 3,669,770 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
14
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
Class A | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 2,726,527 | | | | 5,673,088 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,774,842 | | | | 1,090,809 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (13,344,727 | ) | | | (7,603,566 | ) | | |
Exchange from Class B shares | | | 3,802,947 | | | | 59,169,846 | | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (5,040,411 | ) | | | 58,330,177 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class B | | 2009 | | | 2008* | | | |
|
Sales | | | 313,698 | | | | 929,409 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 493,338 | | | | 1,941,559 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (4,620,022 | ) | | | (27,546,856 | ) | | |
Exchange to Class A shares | | | (3,813,237 | ) | | | (59,168,319 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease | | | (7,626,223 | ) | | | (83,844,207 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
Class C | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 2,785,138 | | | | 781,462 | | | |
Issued in connection with the acquisition of EV Classic Senior Floating-Rate Fund | | | — | | | | 78,124,187 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 2,138,813 | | | | 1,723,721 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (12,947,770 | ) | | | (17,003,055 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (8,023,819 | ) | | | 63,626,315 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Period Ended
| | | |
Class I | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008(1) | | | |
|
Sales | | | 823,912 | | | | 87,165 | | | |
Issued in connection with the acquisition of Eaton Vance Institutional Senior Floating-Rate Fund | | | — | | | | 2,999,203 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 44,200 | | | | 49,463 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (151,250 | ) | | | (1,362,492 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 716,862 | | | | 1,773,339 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 15, 2008, to October 31, 2008 for Advisers Class, Class C and Class I, and March 17, 2008 to October 31, 2008 for Class A. |
|
* | | Information prior to the close of business on March 14, 2008 reflects the historical financial results of Eaton Vance Prime Rate Reserves prior to its reorganization. |
For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund received $8,137 in redemption fees.
8 Reorganization
As of the close of business on March 14, 2008, the Fund acquired the net assets of Eaton Vance Prime Rate Reserves (Prime Rate Reserves) pursuant to a plan of reorganization approved by its shareholders. Prior to this acquisition, the Fund had not commenced operations. The acquisition was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of 92,146,278 shares of Class B of the Fund for the 112,846,521 shares of Prime Rate Reserves outstanding on March 14, 2008. The aggregate net assets of Prime Rate Reserves on March 14, 2008 were $921,462,778.
Additionally, as of the close of business on March 14, 2008, the Fund acquired the net assets of Eaton Vance Advisers Senior Floating-Rate Fund (Advisers Fund), EV Classic Senior Floating-Rate Fund (Classic Fund) and Eaton Vance Institutional Senior Floating-Rate Fund (Institutional Fund), each of which also invested in the Portfolio, pursuant to a plan of reorganization approved by the shareholders. The acquisitions were accomplished by tax-free exchanges of 3,499,728 shares of Advisers Class of the Fund for the 4,294,600 shares of the Advisers Fund outstanding on March 14, 2008, 78,124,187 shares of Class C of the Fund for the 95,962,919 shares of the Classic Fund outstanding on March 14, 2008 and 2,999,203 shares of Class I of the Fund for the 3,680,699 shares of the Institutional Fund outstanding on March 14, 2008. The aggregate net assets of the Fund immediately before the acquisition were $921,462,778. The net assets of the Advisers Fund, Classic Fund and Institutional Fund at that date of $34,997,278, $781,241,870 and $29,992,032, respectively, including $5,962,341, $106,752,582 and $5,311,335 of unrealized appreciation, respectively, were combined with those of the Fund, resulting in combined net assets of $1,767,693,958.
9 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 28, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
15
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate
Advantage Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust) as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 2009
16
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund.
17
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Floating-Rate Interests — 128.9%(1) |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace and Defense — 2.6% |
|
Atlantic Inertial Systems, Inc. |
GBP | 671 | | | Term Loan, 3.56%, Maturing July 20, 2014 | | $ | 1,056,863 | | | |
AWAS Capital, Inc. |
| 5,768 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing March 22, 2013 | | | 5,373,892 | | | |
Colt Defense, LLC |
| 1,457 | | | Term Loan, 3.50%, Maturing July 9, 2014 | | | 1,340,644 | | | |
DAE Aviation Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,549 | | | Term Loan, 4.01%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 1,456,516 | | | |
| 1,584 | | | Term Loan, 4.04%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 1,488,810 | | | |
Evergreen International Aviation |
| 4,693 | | | Term Loan, 12.00%, Maturing October 31, 2011 | | | 3,730,971 | | | |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition |
| 4,475 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing March 26, 2014 | | | 3,557,929 | | | |
| 242 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing March 26, 2014 | | | 192,229 | | | |
Hexcel Corp. |
| 1,406 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing May 21, 2014 | | | 1,416,797 | | | |
IAP Worldwide Services, Inc. |
| 585 | | | Term Loan, 9.25%, Maturing December 30, 2012(2) | | | 492,043 | | | |
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. |
| 2,655 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing December 31, 2011 | | | 2,571,588 | | | |
TransDigm, Inc. |
| 4,000 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing June 23, 2013 | | | 3,846,428 | | | |
Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc. |
| 1,481 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.50%, Maturing December 22, 2009(3) | | | 1,437,037 | | | |
| 667 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 17, 2011 | | | 666,667 | | | |
| 1,092 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 17, 2011 | | | 1,094,712 | | | |
| 433 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 22, 2011 | | | 430,507 | | | |
Wesco Aircraft Hardware Corp. |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing September 29, 2013 | | | 1,897,500 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.00%, Maturing September 29, 2014 | | | 843,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 32,894,883 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Air Transport — 0.3% |
|
Delta Air Lines, Inc. |
| 4,895 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.53%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | $ | 4,126,389 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,126,389 | | | |
|
|
|
Automotive — 5.0% |
|
Accuride Corp. |
| 5,855 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing January 31, 2012 | | $ | 5,827,560 | | | |
| 1,125 | | | Term Loan, Maturing September 30, 2013(4) | | | 1,149,975 | | | |
Adesa, Inc. |
| 7,222 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing October 18, 2013 | | | 6,933,270 | | | |
Allison Transmission, Inc. |
| 859 | | | Term Loan, 3.01%, Maturing September 30, 2014 | | | 772,936 | | | |
Cooper Standard Automotive, Inc. |
| 284 | | | Revolving Loan, 6.75%, Maturing December 23, 2011 | | | 260,246 | | | |
| 1,731 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing December 23, 2010 | | | 1,588,117 | | | |
| 89 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing December 23, 2011 | | | 81,330 | | | |
Dayco Products, LLC |
| 993 | | | DIP Loan, 8.50%, Maturing May 4, 2010 | | | 1,005,534 | | | |
| 1,023 | | | DIP Loan, 8.50%, Maturing May 4, 2010 | | | 1,025,958 | | | |
| 4,522 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing June 21, 2011(5) | | | 2,072,448 | | | |
Federal-Mogul Corp. |
| 7,181 | | | Term Loan, 2.19%, Maturing December 27, 2014 | | | 5,533,886 | | | |
| 4,598 | | | Term Loan, 2.19%, Maturing December 27, 2015 | | | 3,543,410 | | | |
Financiere Truck (Investissement) |
EUR | 563 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing February 15, 2012(3) | | | 596,019 | | | |
Ford Motor Co. |
| 6,359 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing December 15, 2013 | | | 5,683,799 | | | |
Fraikin, Ltd. |
GBP | 691 | | | Term Loan, 0.93%, Maturing February 15, 2012 | | | 816,393 | | | |
GBP | 307 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing February 15, 2012 | | | 362,702 | | | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. |
| 13,299 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 2.34%, Maturing April 30, 2010 | | | 12,192,606 | | | |
HLI Operating Co., Inc. |
| 540 | | | DIP Loan, 26.00%, Maturing November 30, 2009(2) | | | 544,950 | | | |
EUR | 109 | | | Term Loan, 11.00%, Maturing May 30, 2014 | | | 12,041 | | | |
EUR | 1,853 | | | Term Loan, 11.50%, Maturing May 30, 2014 | | | 422,701 | | | |
Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. |
| 4,449 | | | Term Loan, 3.78%, Maturing January 12, 2012 | | | 2,725,219 | | | |
Locafroid Services S.A.S. |
EUR | 132 | | | Term Loan, 3.47%, Maturing February 15, 2012 | | | 140,298 | | | |
Tenneco Automotive, Inc. |
| 3,125 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing March 17, 2014 | | | 2,953,125 | | | |
TriMas Corp. |
| 375 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing August 2, 2011 | | | 345,469 | | | |
| 1,576 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 1,452,120 | | | |
TRW Automotive, Inc. |
| 2,748 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing February 2, 2014 | | | 2,753,480 | | | |
See notes to financial statements18
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Automotive (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
United Components, Inc. |
| 2,779 | | | Term Loan, 2.72%, Maturing June 30, 2010 | | $ | 2,577,798 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 63,373,390 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverage and Tobacco — 0.3% |
|
Culligan International Co. |
EUR | 3,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.19%, Maturing May 31, 2013 | | $ | 1,644,570 | | | |
Van Houtte, Inc. |
| 234 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing July 11, 2014 | | | 223,427 | | | |
| 1,717 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing July 11, 2014 | | | 1,638,462 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,506,459 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Brokers, Dealers and Investment Houses — 0.4% |
|
AmeriTrade Holding Corp. |
| 5,578 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing December 31, 2012 | | $ | 5,424,365 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,424,365 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building and Development — 3.8% |
|
401 North Wabash Venture, LLC |
| 2,180 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing May 7, 2009(6) | | $ | 1,634,640 | | | |
AIMCO Properties, L.P. |
| 4,725 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing March 23, 2011 | | | 4,536,000 | | | |
Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc. |
| 1,900 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing September 30, 2013 | | | 1,793,222 | | | |
Brickman Group Holdings, Inc. |
| 2,415 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing January 23, 2014 | | | 2,279,828 | | | |
Capital Automotive (REIT) |
| 1,935 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing December 14, 2012 | | | 1,731,518 | | | |
Epco/Fantome, LLC |
| 4,488 | | | Term Loan, 2.87%, Maturing November 23, 2010 | | | 3,433,320 | | | |
Forestar USA Real Estate Group, Inc. |
| 3,754 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.39%, Maturing December 1, 2010(3) | | | 3,153,715 | | | |
| 3,018 | | | Term Loan, 5.10%, Maturing December 1, 2010 | | | 2,716,071 | | | |
Hearthstone Housing Partners II, LLC |
| 1,992 | | | Revolving Loan, 1.75%, Maturing December 1, 2009(3) | | | 1,327,418 | | | |
Lafarge Roofing |
| 540 | | | Term Loan, 2.41%, Maturing July 16, 2014 | | | 396,352 | | | |
| 548 | | | Term Loan, 2.66%, Maturing July 16, 2014 | | | 402,062 | | | |
EUR | 353 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing April 16, 2015 | | | 253,361 | | | |
LNR Property Corp. |
| 1,541 | | | Term Loan, 3.75%, Maturing July 3, 2011 | | | 1,224,714 | | | |
Materis |
EUR | 819 | | | Term Loan, 3.10%, Maturing April 27, 2014 | | | 888,447 | | | |
EUR | 872 | | | Term Loan, 3.47%, Maturing April 27, 2015 | | | 946,008 | | | |
Mueller Water Products, Inc. |
| 2,096 | | | Term Loan, 5.78%, Maturing May 24, 2014 | | | 2,052,593 | | | |
NCI Building Systems, Inc. |
| 1,117 | | | Term Loan, 4.03%, Maturing June 18, 2010 | | | 1,040,118 | | | |
Panolam Industries Holdings, Inc. |
| 2,104 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing September 30, 2012 | | | 1,898,490 | | | |
Re/Max International, Inc. |
| 1,912 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing December 17, 2012 | | | 1,873,820 | | | |
| 3,097 | | | Term Loan, 9.77%, Maturing December 17, 2012 | | | 3,050,418 | | | |
Realogy Corp. |
| 416 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing September 1, 2014 | | | 349,600 | | | |
| 2,569 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing September 1, 2014 | | | 2,159,707 | | | |
Sanitec Europe OY |
EUR | 2,325 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing June 25, 2016 | | | 2,372,066 | | | |
South Edge, LLC |
| 4,475 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing October 31, 2009(6) | | | 1,376,062 | | | |
WCI Communities, Inc. |
| 1,248 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing September 3, 2014 | | | 1,070,131 | | | |
| 4,016 | | | Term Loan, 10.06%, Maturing September 3, 2014 | | | 3,965,383 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 47,925,064 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Business Equipment and Services — 10.2% |
|
Activant Solutions, Inc. |
| 2,038 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing May 1, 2013 | | $ | 1,900,733 | | | |
Affiliated Computer Services |
| 6,337 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 20, 2013 | | | 6,270,655 | | | |
| 1,915 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 20, 2013 | | | 1,895,084 | | | |
Affinion Group, Inc. |
| 6,699 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing October 17, 2012 | | | 6,442,638 | | | |
Allied Barton Security Service |
| 1,437 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing February 21, 2015 | | | 1,456,352 | | | |
Education Management, LLC |
| 5,645 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing June 1, 2013 | | | 5,305,806 | | | |
Info USA, Inc. |
| 807 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing February 14, 2012 | | | 780,958 | | | |
Intergraph Corp. |
| 837 | | | Term Loan, 2.37%, Maturing May 29, 2014 | | | 803,362 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.29%, Maturing November 29, 2014 | | | 1,925,000 | | | |
iPayment, Inc. |
| 3,500 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing May 10, 2013 | | | 3,198,207 | | | |
Kronos, Inc. |
| 2,488 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing June 11, 2014 | | | 2,347,951 | | | |
See notes to financial statements19
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Business Equipment and Services (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Language Line, Inc. |
| 6,170 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing June 11, 2011 | | $ | 6,169,697 | | | |
| 4,725 | | | Term Loan, Maturing October 30, 2015(4) | | | 4,727,953 | | | |
Mitchell International, Inc. |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.56%, Maturing March 28, 2015 | | | 680,000 | | | |
N.E.W. Holdings I, LLC |
| 4,554 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing May 22, 2014 | | | 4,266,640 | | | |
Protection One, Inc. |
| 3,137 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing March 31, 2012 | | | 3,002,171 | | | |
Quantum Corp. |
| 666 | | | Term Loan, 3.78%, Maturing July 12, 2014 | | | 608,754 | | | |
Quintiles Transnational Corp. |
| 4,596 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing March 31, 2013 | | | 4,386,037 | | | |
RiskMetrics Group Holdings, LLC |
| 3,494 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing January 11, 2014 | | | 3,406,390 | | | |
Sabre, Inc. |
| 12,884 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing September 30, 2014 | | | 11,185,136 | | | |
Serena Software, Inc. |
| 2,725 | | | Term Loan, 2.32%, Maturing March 10, 2013 | | | 2,523,899 | | | |
Sitel (Client Logic) |
| 4,758 | | | Term Loan, 5.77%, Maturing January 29, 2014 | | | 4,139,637 | | | |
Solera Holdings, LLC |
| 2,582 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 2,480,010 | | | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc. |
| 614 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing February 11, 2013 | | | 577,929 | | | |
| 1,683 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 1,704,038 | | | |
| 17,340 | | | Term Loan, 4.07%, Maturing February 28, 2016 | | | 16,872,167 | | | |
Ticketmaster |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.55%, Maturing July 22, 2014 | | | 1,970,000 | | | |
Transaction Network Services, Inc. |
| 1,621 | | | Term Loan, 9.50%, Maturing May 4, 2012 | | | 1,637,365 | | | |
Travelport, LLC |
| 3,910 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 3,565,083 | | | |
| 4,957 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 4,523,592 | | | |
| 2,357 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 2,150,640 | | | |
EUR | 1,053 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing August 23, 2013 | | | 1,386,817 | | | |
Valassis Communications, Inc. |
| 1,323 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing March 2, 2014 | | | 1,238,176 | | | |
VWR International, Inc. |
| 5,392 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 28, 2013 | | | 4,933,223 | | | |
West Corp. |
| 3,659 | | | Term Loan, 2.62%, Maturing October 24, 2013 | | | 3,367,845 | | | |
| 5,314 | | | Term Loan, 4.12%, Maturing July 15, 2016 | | | 5,007,537 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 128,837,482 | | | |
|
|
|
Cable and Satellite Television — 10.1% |
|
Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC |
| 5,180 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing June 8, 2013 | | $ | 5,166,814 | | | |
| 193 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing September 1, 2013 | | | 190,135 | | | |
Bresnan Broadband Holdings, LLC |
| 1,440 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing March 29, 2014 | | | 1,386,973 | | | |
| 2,985 | | | Term Loan, 2.42%, Maturing March 29, 2014 | | | 2,875,549 | | | |
Cequel Communications, LLC |
| 14,884 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing November 5, 2013 | | | 14,251,503 | | | |
| 3,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 4.79%, Maturing May 5, 2014 | | | 2,938,500 | | | |
Charter Communications Operating, Inc. |
| 18,532 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing April 28, 2013 | | | 16,896,790 | | | |
CSC Holdings, Inc. |
| 9,264 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing March 29, 2013 | | | 8,836,957 | | | |
DirectTV Holdings, LLC |
| 1,686 | | | Term Loan, 1.74%, Maturing April 13, 2013 | | | 1,654,656 | | | |
Foxco Acquisition Sub., LLC |
| 1,340 | | | Term Loan, 7.25%, Maturing July 2, 2015 | | | 1,224,517 | | | |
Insight Midwest Holdings, LLC |
| 7,838 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing April 6, 2014 | | | 7,470,015 | | | |
MCC Iowa, LLC |
| 1,911 | | | Term Loan, 1.98%, Maturing January 31, 2015 | | | 1,758,220 | | | |
Mediacom Illinois, LLC |
| 2,430 | | | Term Loan, 1.48%, Maturing September 30, 2012 | | | 2,259,900 | | | |
| 5,861 | | | Term Loan, 1.73%, Maturing January 31, 2015 | | | 5,389,316 | | | |
NTL Investment Holdings, Ltd. |
GBP | 1,501 | | | Term Loan, 5.12%, Maturing September 3, 2012 | | | 2,392,825 | | | |
ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG |
EUR | 1,072 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing March 2, 2015 | | | 1,055,683 | | | |
EUR | 263 | | | Term Loan, 2.73%, Maturing June 26, 2015 | | | 327,510 | | | |
EUR | 6,272 | | | Term Loan, 2.73%, Maturing June 26, 2015 | | | 7,811,162 | | | |
EUR | 1,072 | | | Term Loan, 3.78%, Maturing March 2, 2016 | | | 1,055,683 | | | |
San Juan Cable, LLC |
| 963 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing October 31, 2012 | | | 899,969 | | | |
UPC Broadband Holding B.V. |
| 1,593 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 1,493,897 | | | |
| 1,864 | | | Term Loan, 3.75%, Maturing December 31, 2016 | | | 1,794,219 | | | |
EUR | 8,221 | | | Term Loan, 4.19%, Maturing December 31, 2016 | | | 11,130,863 | | | |
EUR | 5,930 | | | Term Loan, 4.44%, Maturing December 31, 2017 | | | 8,065,706 | | | |
Virgin Media Investment Holding |
GBP | 3,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing March 2, 2012(4) | | | 4,805,130 | | | |
| 3,296 | | | Term Loan, 3.78%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 3,283,225 | | | |
GBP | 1,188 | | | Term Loan, 4.40%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 1,892,688 | | | |
GBP | 1,388 | | | Term Loan, 4.40%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 2,212,252 | | | |
GBP | 763 | | | Term Loan, 4.43%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | | 1,216,691 | | | |
See notes to financial statements20
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Cable and Satellite Television (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
YPSO Holding SA |
EUR | 957 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing July 28, 2014 | | $ | 1,090,700 | | | |
EUR | 1,562 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing July 28, 2014 | | | 1,779,564 | | | |
EUR | 2,481 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing July 28, 2014 | | | 2,826,254 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 127,433,866 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics — 7.6% |
|
Ashland, Inc. |
| 1,460 | | | Term Loan, 7.65%, Maturing November 20, 2014 | | $ | 1,486,230 | | | |
AZ Chem US, Inc. |
| 922 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing February 28, 2013 | | | 878,320 | | | |
Brenntag Holding GmbH and Co. KG |
| 3,537 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 3,368,768 | | | |
| 864 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 822,529 | | | |
EUR | 2,071 | | | Term Loan, 2.88%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 2,948,774 | | | |
EUR | 377 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing December 23, 2014 | | | 536,767 | | | |
EUR | 486 | | | Term Loan, 2.87%, Maturing December 23, 2014 | | | 691,891 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 4.25%, Maturing December 23, 2015 | | | 938,333 | | | |
British Vita UK, Ltd. |
EUR | 1,205 | | | Term Loan, 5.78%, Maturing June 30, 2014(2) | | | 1,217,627 | | | |
Celanese Holdings, LLC |
| 2,500 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 2,349,220 | | | |
| 9,135 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 8,567,918 | | | |
Cognis GmbH |
EUR | 615 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing September 15, 2013 | | | 825,865 | | | |
EUR | 2,510 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing September 15, 2013 | | | 3,372,281 | | | |
Columbian Chemicals Acquisition |
| 429 | | | Term Loan, 6.31%, Maturing March 16, 2013 | | | 365,960 | | | |
Ferro Corp. |
| 6,111 | | | Term Loan, 6.29%, Maturing June 6, 2012 | | | 5,820,317 | | | |
Georgia Gulf Corp. |
| 1,966 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing October 3, 2013 | | | 1,967,162 | | | |
Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. |
EUR | 737 | | | Term Loan, 2.95%, Maturing May 5, 2012 | | | 844,270 | | | |
| 1,282 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 1,019,514 | | | |
| 5,903 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 4,693,280 | | | |
| 3,910 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing June 15, 2014 | | | 3,069,350 | | | |
Huntsman International, LLC |
| 5,660 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing August 16, 2012 | | | 5,182,458 | | | |
INEOS Group |
EUR | 416 | | | Term Loan, 5.52%, Maturing December 14, 2011 | | | 521,887 | | | |
EUR | 2,568 | | | Term Loan, 5.52%, Maturing December 14, 2011 | | | 3,219,227 | | | |
EUR | 2,676 | | | Term Loan, 6.02%, Maturing December 14, 2011 | | | 3,354,015 | | | |
EUR | 309 | | | Term Loan, 8.02%, Maturing December 14, 2011 | | | 387,099 | | | |
| 1,620 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing December 14, 2012 | | | 1,397,372 | | | |
| 2,552 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 14, 2013 | | | 2,189,398 | | | |
| 2,484 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing December 14, 2014 | | | 2,131,550 | | | |
EUR | 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, Maturing December 14, 2012(4) | | | 1,101,439 | | | |
ISP Chemco, Inc. |
| 6,635 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 6,297,042 | | | |
Kranton Polymers, LLC |
| 5,457 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing May 12, 2013 | | | 5,192,268 | | | |
MacDermid, Inc. |
EUR | 1,081 | | | Term Loan, 2.64%, Maturing April 12, 2014 | | | 1,254,215 | | | |
Millenium Inorganic Chemicals |
| 3,927 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 3,612,868 | | | |
Momentive Performance Material |
| 4,714 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing December 4, 2013 | | | 3,946,549 | | | |
Nalco Co. |
| 1,318 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing May 6, 2016 | | | 1,343,095 | | | |
Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc. |
| 7,756 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 7,865,148 | | | |
Schoeller Arca Systems Holding |
EUR | 289 | | | Term Loan, 3.68%, Maturing November 16, 2015 | | | 272,239 | | | |
EUR | 824 | | | Term Loan, 3.68%, Maturing November 16, 2015 | | | 776,203 | | | |
EUR | 887 | | | Term Loan, 3.68%, Maturing November 16, 2015 | | | 835,271 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 96,663,719 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Clothing / Textiles — 0.5% |
|
Hanesbrands, Inc. |
| 1,925 | | | Term Loan, 5.03%, Maturing September 5, 2013 | | $ | 1,936,602 | | | |
| 2,025 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.99%, Maturing March 5, 2014 | | | 1,961,718 | | | |
St. John Knits International, Inc. |
| 1,748 | | | Term Loan, 9.25%, Maturing March 23, 2012 | | | 1,416,005 | | | |
The William Carter Co. |
| 1,146 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing July 14, 2012 | | | 1,120,602 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,434,927 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Conglomerates — 3.8% |
|
Amsted Industries, Inc. |
| 4,901 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing October 15, 2010 | | $ | 4,496,360 | | | |
| 473 | | | Term Loan, 2.40%, Maturing April 5, 2013 | | | 433,823 | | | |
Doncasters (Dunde HoldCo 4 Ltd.) |
GBP | 581 | | | Term Loan, 3.02%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 775,255 | | | |
GBP | 581 | | | Term Loan, 3.52%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 775,255 | | | |
| 1,307 | | | Term Loan, 4.24%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 1,061,891 | | | |
| 1,307 | | | Term Loan, 4.74%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 1,061,891 | | | |
See notes to financial statements21
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Conglomerates (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Gentek Holding, LLC |
| 825 | | | Term Loan, Maturing October 29, 2014(4) | | $ | 830,843 | | | |
Jarden Corp. |
| 987 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing January 24, 2012 | | | 952,776 | | | |
| 4,184 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing January 24, 2012 | | | 4,047,074 | | | |
| 1,515 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing January 24, 2012 | | | 1,487,484 | | | |
Johnson Diversey, Inc. |
| 1,034 | | | Term Loan, 2.48%, Maturing December 16, 2010 | | | 1,029,948 | | | |
| 4,847 | | | Term Loan, 2.48%, Maturing December 16, 2011 | | | 4,827,549 | | | |
Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The) |
| 5,769 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing August 21, 2014 | | | 5,689,639 | | | |
Polymer Group, Inc. |
| 2,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.74%, Maturing November 22, 2010(3) | | | 1,700,000 | | | |
| 5,374 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing November 22, 2014 | | | 5,387,813 | | | |
RBS Global, Inc. |
| 1,068 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 19, 2013 | | | 1,024,225 | | | |
| 4,878 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing July 19, 2013 | | | 4,699,012 | | | |
RGIS Holdings, LLC |
| 269 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 239,444 | | | |
| 5,373 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 4,788,877 | | | |
US Investigations Services, Inc. |
| 1,960 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing February 21, 2015 | | | 1,826,627 | | | |
Vertrue, Inc. |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing August 16, 2014 | | | 827,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 47,963,286 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Containers and Glass Products — 4.2% |
|
Berry Plastics Corp. |
| 6,088 | | | Term Loan, 2.30%, Maturing April 3, 2015 | | $ | 5,246,199 | | | |
Consolidated Container Co. |
| 887 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing March 28, 2014 | | | 825,767 | | | |
| 1,500 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.75%, Maturing September 28, 2014 | | | 1,246,250 | | | |
Crown Americas, Inc. |
| 1,334 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 1,308,186 | | | |
EUR | 970 | | | Term Loan, 2.18%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 1,379,323 | | | |
Graham Packaging Holdings Co. |
| 1,785 | | | Term Loan, 2.55%, Maturing October 7, 2011 | | | 1,745,790 | | | |
| 7,903 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing April 5, 2014 | | | 7,922,420 | | | |
Graphic Packaging International, Inc. |
| 6,148 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing May 16, 2014 | | | 5,860,588 | | | |
| 1,970 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing May 16, 2014 | | | 1,896,125 | | | |
JSG Acquisitions |
EUR | 2,414 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 3,423,068 | | | |
EUR | 2,414 | | | Term Loan, 4.11%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 3,422,674 | | | |
OI European Group B.V. |
EUR | 3,830 | | | Term Loan, 1.93%, Maturing June 14, 2013 | | | 5,401,570 | | | |
Owens-Brockway Glass Container |
| 4,788 | | | Term Loan, 1.74%, Maturing June 14, 2013 | | | 4,677,785 | | | |
Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. |
| 3,578 | | | Revolving Loan, 2.84%, Maturing July 28, 2010 | | | 3,505,968 | | | |
| 1,187 | | | Revolving Loan, 3.06%, Maturing July 28, 2010 | | | 1,162,823 | | | |
| 466 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 452,590 | | | |
| 817 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 796,073 | | | |
| 1,540 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 1,496,938 | | | |
| 718 | | | Term Loan, 4.50%, Maturing November 1, 2011 | | | 699,520 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 52,469,657 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Cosmetics / Toiletries — 0.4% |
|
American Safety Razor Co. |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.54%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | $ | 817,500 | | | |
Bausch & Lomb, Inc. |
| 216 | | | Term Loan, 3.52%, Maturing April 30, 2015 | | | 205,948 | | | |
| 888 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing April 30, 2015 | | | 848,074 | | | |
Prestige Brands, Inc. |
| 3,684 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing April 7, 2011 | | | 3,619,213 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,490,735 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Drugs — 0.9% |
|
Chattem, Inc. |
| 1,097 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing January 2, 2013 | | $ | 1,080,791 | | | |
Graceway Pharmaceuticals, LLC |
| 5,708 | | | Term Loan, 2.99%, Maturing May 3, 2012 | | | 4,024,082 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.74%, Maturing May 3, 2013 | | | 342,500 | | | |
Pharmaceutical Holdings Corp. |
| 1,197 | | | Term Loan, 3.50%, Maturing January 30, 2012 | | | 1,134,293 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp. |
| 1,747 | | | Term Loan, Maturing October 30, 2014(4) | | | 1,752,913 | | | |
| 612 | | | Term Loan, Maturing April 30, 2015(4) | | | 613,519 | | | |
| 874 | | | Term Loan, Maturing April 30, 2015(4) | | | 876,456 | | | |
| 1,922 | | | Term Loan, Maturing April 30, 2015(4) | | | 1,902,827 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,727,381 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 1.5% |
|
Blue Waste B.V. (AVR Acquisition) |
EUR | 4,000 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing April 1, 2015 | | $ | 5,448,051 | | | |
See notes to financial statements22
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc. |
| 208 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 13.50%, Maturing December 12, 2010 | | $ | 186,525 | | | |
Kemble Water Structure, Ltd. |
GBP | 8,500 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 4.49%, Maturing October 13, 2013 | | | 10,736,996 | | | |
Sensus Metering Systems, Inc. |
| 2,997 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing June 3, 2013 | | | 3,007,932 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 19,379,504 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronics / Electrical — 4.0% |
|
Aspect Software, Inc. |
| 3,949 | | | Term Loan, 3.31%, Maturing July 11, 2011 | | $ | 3,622,954 | | | |
FCI International S.A.S. |
| 497 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 453,112 | | | |
| 497 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 453,112 | | | |
| 516 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 470,657 | | | |
| 516 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing November 1, 2013 | | | 470,657 | | | |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. |
| 6,535 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing December 1, 2013 | | | 5,328,011 | | | |
Infor Enterprise Solutions Holdings |
EUR | 1,945 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing July 28, 2012 | | | 2,558,235 | | | |
| 4,107 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing July 28, 2012 | | | 3,624,655 | | | |
| 7,872 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing July 28, 2012 | | | 6,947,254 | | | |
| 500 | | | Term Loan, 5.74%, Maturing March 2, 2014 | | | 340,625 | | | |
Network Solutions, LLC |
| 2,085 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing March 7, 2014 | | | 1,876,113 | | | |
Open Solutions, Inc. |
| 5,437 | | | Term Loan, 2.41%, Maturing January 23, 2014 | | | 4,412,711 | | | |
Sensata Technologies Finance Co. |
| 6,595 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing April 27, 2013 | | | 5,678,175 | | | |
Spectrum Brands, Inc. |
| 440 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing March 30, 2013 | | | 431,075 | | | |
| 8,551 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing March 30, 2013 | | | 8,383,775 | | | |
VeriFone, Inc. |
| 226 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing October 31, 2013 | | | 216,069 | | | |
Vertafore, Inc. |
| 4,826 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 4,753,856 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 50,021,046 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Equipment Leasing — 0.4% |
|
Hertz Corp. |
| 4,277 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing December 21, 2012 | | $ | 4,001,721 | | | |
| 785 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing December 21, 2012 | | | 734,542 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,736,263 | | | |
|
|
|
Farming / Agriculture — 0.5% |
|
BF Bolthouse HoldCo, LLC |
| 1,719 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing December 16, 2012 | | $ | 1,681,679 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.74%, Maturing December 16, 2013 | | | 947,500 | | | |
Central Garden & Pet Co. |
| 3,362 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 3,199,035 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,828,214 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Financial Intermediaries — 2.0% |
|
Citco III, Ltd. |
| 6,189 | | | Term Loan, 2.85%, Maturing June 30, 2014 | | $ | 5,415,092 | | | |
E.A. Viner International Co. |
| 132 | | | Term Loan, 4.79%, Maturing July 31, 2013 | | | 124,375 | | | |
Grosvenor Capital Management |
| 1,414 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing December 5, 2013 | | | 1,286,978 | | | |
Jupiter Asset Management Group |
GBP | 1,321 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 30, 2015 | | | 2,048,970 | | | |
LPL Holdings, Inc. |
| 11,607 | | | Term Loan, 2.01%, Maturing December 18, 2014 | | | 10,968,947 | | | |
Nuveen Investments, Inc. |
| 2,262 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing November 2, 2014 | | | 1,959,096 | | | |
Oxford Acquisition III, Ltd. |
| 2,965 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing May 24, 2014 | | | 2,465,747 | | | |
RJO Holdings Corp. (RJ O’Brien) |
| 1,446 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 972,614 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 25,241,819 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 3.2% |
|
Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc. |
| 7,021 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing March 29, 2013 | | $ | 6,687,535 | | | |
American Seafoods Group, LLC |
| 329 | | | Term Loan, 4.03%, Maturing September 30, 2012 | | | 320,972 | | | |
B&G Foods, Inc. |
| 1,130 | | | Term Loan, 2.35%, Maturing February 23, 2013 | | | 1,112,065 | | | |
BL Marketing, Ltd. |
GBP | 1,500 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing December 31, 2013 | | | 2,369,554 | | | |
Dean Foods Co. |
| 8,999 | | | Term Loan, 1.66%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 8,430,546 | | | |
Dole Food Company, Inc. |
| 312 | | | Term Loan, 7.15%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 315,977 | | | |
| 544 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 550,929 | | | |
| 1,956 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 1,978,763 | | | |
Pinnacle Foods Finance, LLC |
| 3,000 | | | Revolving Loan, 0.90%, Maturing April 2, 2013(3) | | | 2,025,000 | | | |
| 10,467 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 9,825,555 | | | |
See notes to financial statements23
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Food Products (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Reddy Ice Group, Inc. |
| 7,975 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing August 9, 2012 | | $ | 7,137,625 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 40,754,521 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Service — 3.4% |
|
AFC Enterprises, Inc. |
| 833 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing May 11, 2011 | | $ | 839,687 | | | |
Aramark Corp. |
| 1,113 | | | Term Loan, 2.14%, Maturing January 26, 2014 | | | 1,023,512 | | | |
| 17,088 | | | Term Loan, 2.16%, Maturing January 26, 2014 | | | 15,714,184 | | | |
| 169 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing October 22, 2014 | | | 162,285 | | | |
Buffets, Inc. |
| 1,569 | | | Term Loan, 18.00%, Maturing April 30, 2012 | | | 1,602,670 | | | |
| 313 | | | Term Loan, 7.53%, Maturing November 1, 2013(2) | | | 275,226 | | | |
| 1,566 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 17.78%, Maturing November 1, 2013(2) | | | 1,377,690 | | | |
CBRL Group, Inc. |
| 6,139 | | | Term Loan, 1.97%, Maturing April 27, 2013 | | | 5,920,681 | | | |
JRD Holdings, Inc. |
| 2,083 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing June 26, 2014 | | | 2,004,707 | | | |
Maine Beverage Co., LLC |
| 1,312 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 30, 2010 | | | 1,214,062 | | | |
NPC International, Inc. |
| 1,843 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing May 3, 2013 | | | 1,753,384 | | | |
OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC |
| 354 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing May 9, 2013 | | | 295,955 | | | |
| 4,021 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 9, 2014 | | | 3,359,639 | | | |
QCE Finance, LLC |
| 4,168 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 3,373,972 | | | |
Sagittarius Restaurants, LLC |
| 1,123 | | | Term Loan, 9.75%, Maturing March 29, 2013 | | | 1,044,550 | | | |
Selecta |
GBP | 2,500 | | | Term Loan, 3.79%, Maturing June 28, 2015 | | | 3,056,827 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 43,019,031 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food / Drug Retailers — 3.0% |
|
General Nutrition Centers, Inc. |
| 7,193 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing September 16, 2013 | | $ | 6,676,029 | | | |
Pantry, Inc. (The) |
| 737 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 698,931 | | | |
| 2,560 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 2,427,631 | | | |
Rite Aid Corp. |
| 14,598 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing June 1, 2014 | | | 12,660,641 | | | |
| 2,450 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 2,303,235 | | | |
| 2,500 | | | Term Loan, 9.50%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 2,591,667 | | | |
Roundy’s Supermarkets, Inc. |
| 10,769 | | | Term Loan, 6.03%, Maturing November 3, 2011 | | | 10,625,093 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 37,983,227 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Forest Products — 2.3% |
|
Appleton Papers, Inc. |
| 4,350 | | | Term Loan, 6.63%, Maturing June 5, 2014 | | $ | 3,958,386 | | | |
Georgia-Pacific Corp. |
| 11,740 | | | Term Loan, 2.32%, Maturing December 20, 2012 | | | 11,332,231 | | | |
| 8,360 | | | Term Loan, 2.33%, Maturing December 20, 2012 | | | 8,069,979 | | | |
| 3,203 | | | Term Loan, 3.59%, Maturing December 23, 2014 | | | 3,187,636 | | | |
Xerium Technologies, Inc. |
| 2,839 | | | Term Loan, 5.78%, Maturing May 18, 2012 | | | 2,327,873 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 28,876,105 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care — 11.5% |
|
Accellent, Inc. |
| 2,614 | | | Term Loan, 2.87%, Maturing November 22, 2012 | | $ | 2,485,733 | | | |
Alliance Imaging, Inc. |
| 1,821 | | | Term Loan, 2.86%, Maturing December 29, 2011 | | | 1,765,998 | | | |
American Medical Systems |
| 1,914 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 20, 2012 | | | 1,861,241 | | | |
AMN Healthcare, Inc. |
| 584 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing November 2, 2011 | | | 545,701 | | | |
AMR HoldCo, Inc. |
| 1,608 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing February 10, 2012 | | | 1,547,734 | | | |
Biomet, Inc. |
| 7,386 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing December 26, 2014 | | | 7,110,855 | | | |
EUR | 1,048 | | | Term Loan, 3.58%, Maturing December 26, 2014 | | | 1,476,526 | | | |
Cardinal Health 409, Inc. |
| 5,938 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing April 10, 2014 | | | 5,178,209 | | | |
Carestream Health, Inc. |
| 6,580 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing April 30, 2013 | | | 6,169,723 | | | |
Carl Zeiss Vision Holding GmbH |
| 3,701 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing March 23, 2015 | | | 2,609,127 | | | |
Community Health Systems, Inc. |
| 1,009 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 941,775 | | | |
| 19,762 | | | Term Loan, 2.61%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 18,454,320 | | | |
Concentra, Inc. |
| 2,151 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 25, 2014 | | | 2,005,341 | | | |
ConMed Corp. |
| 1,015 | | | Term Loan, 1.74%, Maturing April 13, 2013 | | | 944,204 | | | |
CRC Health Corp. |
| 1,358 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing February 6, 2013 | | | 1,215,410 | | | |
| 1,461 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing February 6, 2013 | | | 1,307,821 | | | |
See notes to financial statements24
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Health Care (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Dako (Eqt Project Delphi) |
EUR | 1,337 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing June 12, 2015 | | $ | 1,613,268 | | | |
DaVita, Inc. |
| 7,807 | | | Term Loan, 1.76%, Maturing October 5, 2012 | | | 7,510,112 | | | |
DJO Finance, LLC |
| 995 | | | Term Loan, 3.26%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 961,358 | | | |
HCA, Inc. |
| 20,989 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing November 18, 2013 | | | 19,588,385 | | | |
Health Management Association, Inc. |
| 10,492 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 9,759,180 | | | |
HealthSouth Corp. |
| 1,370 | | | Term Loan, 2.55%, Maturing March 10, 2013 | | | 1,308,729 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan, 2.65%, Maturing March 10, 2013 | | | 910,000 | | | |
| 1,128 | | | Term Loan, 4.05%, Maturing March 15, 2014 | | | 1,105,338 | | | |
Iasis Healthcare, LLC |
| 960 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 14, 2014 | | | 905,140 | | | |
| 2,773 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 14, 2014 | | | 2,615,510 | | | |
| 259 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing March 14, 2014 | | | 244,426 | | | |
IM U.S. Holdings, LLC |
| 3,837 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing June 26, 2014 | | | 3,635,262 | | | |
Invacare Corp. |
| 576 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing February 12, 2013 | | | 549,360 | | | |
inVentiv Health, Inc. |
| 2,128 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing July 6, 2014 | | | 1,995,124 | | | |
LifePoint Hospitals, Inc. |
| 2,242 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing April 15, 2012 | | | 2,177,810 | | | |
MultiPlan Merger Corp. |
| 1,086 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 1,028,549 | | | |
| 1,370 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 1,297,649 | | | |
Mylan, Inc. |
| 6,465 | | | Term Loan, 3.55%, Maturing October 2, 2014 | | | 6,303,251 | | | |
National Mentor Holdings, Inc. |
| 3,105 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 2,796,700 | | | |
| 190 | | | Term Loan, 4.59%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 171,479 | | | |
Nyco Holdings |
EUR | 2,321 | | | Term Loan, 2.93%, Maturing December 29, 2014 | | | 3,175,475 | | | |
EUR | 2,321 | | | Term Loan, 3.68%, Maturing December 29, 2015 | | | 3,175,475 | | | |
RadNet Management, Inc. |
| 2,602 | | | Term Loan, 4.54%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 2,511,008 | | | |
ReAble Therapeutics Finance, LLC |
| 4,353 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing November 16, 2013 | | | 4,156,887 | | | |
Select Medical Holdings Corp. |
| 4,728 | | | Term Loan, 4.16%, Maturing August 5, 2014 | | | 4,740,264 | | | |
Sunrise Medical Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,656 | | | Term Loan, 8.25%, Maturing May 13, 2010 | | | 1,200,651 | | | |
TZ Merger Sub., Inc. (TriZetto) |
| 995 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing July 24, 2015 | | | 999,950 | | | |
Vanguard Health Holding Co., LLC |
| 2,801 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing September 23, 2011 | | | 2,737,817 | | | |
Viant Holdings, Inc. |
| 715 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 25, 2014 | | | 696,893 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 145,490,768 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Home Furnishings — 1.2% |
|
Hunter Fan Co. |
| 1,415 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing April 16, 2014 | | $ | 1,018,867 | | | |
Interline Brands, Inc. |
| 826 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing June 23, 2013 | | | 762,065 | | | |
| 2,635 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 23, 2013 | | | 2,431,088 | | | |
National Bedding Co., LLC |
| 1,834 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing August 31, 2011 | | | 1,673,892 | | | |
Oreck Corp. |
| 1,239 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing February 2, 2012(5)(7) | | | 444,835 | | | |
Simmons Co. |
| 8,778 | | | Term Loan, 10.50%, Maturing December 19, 2011 | | | 8,706,398 | | | |
| 2,181 | | | Term Loan, 7.35%, Maturing February 15, 2012(2) | | | 65,419 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,102,564 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Equipment — 2.8% |
|
CEVA Group PLC U.S. |
| 3,433 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | $ | 2,897,878 | | | |
| 413 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 343,610 | | | |
EUR | 259 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 317,171 | | | |
EUR | 440 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 538,593 | | | |
EUR | 541 | | | Term Loan, 3.43%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 661,934 | | | |
EUR | 435 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing January 4, 2014 | | | 532,953 | | | |
EPD Holdings (Goodyear Engineering Products) |
| 451 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 13, 2014 | | | 365,300 | | | |
| 3,151 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing July 13, 2014 | | | 2,550,594 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.00%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 610,000 | | | |
Generac Acquisition Corp. |
| 1,727 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing November 7, 2013 | | | 1,565,878 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.28%, Maturing April 7, 2014 | | | 1,712,500 | | | |
Gleason Corp. |
| 591 | | | Term Loan, 2.09%, Maturing June 30, 2013 | | | 576,084 | | | |
| 1,749 | | | Term Loan, 2.09%, Maturing June 30, 2013 | | | 1,705,210 | | | |
Jason, Inc. |
| 1,325 | | | Term Loan, 5.03%, Maturing April 30, 2010 | | | 695,633 | | | |
See notes to financial statements25
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Industrial Equipment (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
John Maneely Co. |
| 7,220 | | | Term Loan, 3.51%, Maturing December 8, 2013 | | $ | 6,633,092 | | | |
KION Group GmbH |
EUR | 500 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 23, 2014(4) | | | 509,559 | | | |
| 1,750 | | | Term Loan, 2.49%, Maturing December 23, 2014 | | | 1,205,312 | | | |
EUR | 500 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 23, 2015(4) | | | 509,559 | | | |
| 1,750 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing December 23, 2015 | | | 1,205,313 | | | |
Polypore, Inc. |
| 8,309 | | | Term Loan, 2.46%, Maturing July 3, 2014 | | | 7,779,067 | | | |
EUR | 726 | | | Term Loan, 2.64%, Maturing July 3, 2014 | | | 994,012 | | | |
TFS Acquisition Corp. |
| 1,936 | | | Term Loan, 14.00%, Maturing August 11, 2013(2) | | | 1,292,225 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 35,201,477 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 2.7% |
|
Alliant Holdings I, Inc. |
| 5,000 | | | Term Loan, 0.50%, Maturing August 21, 2012(3) | | $ | 4,350,000 | | | |
Applied Systems, Inc. |
| 1,915 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing September 26, 2013 | | | 1,820,235 | | | |
CCC Information Services Group, Inc. |
| 3,954 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing February 10, 2013 | | | 3,840,538 | | | |
Conseco, Inc. |
| 9,345 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing October 10, 2013 | | | 8,465,150 | | | |
Crump Group, Inc. |
| 2,416 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing August 4, 2014 | | | 2,186,536 | | | |
Getty Images, Inc. |
| 3,705 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing July 2, 2015 | | | 3,731,050 | | | |
Hub International Holdings, Inc. |
| 863 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 13, 2014 | | | 761,502 | | | |
| 3,841 | | | Term Loan, 2.74%, Maturing June 13, 2014 | | | 3,387,871 | | | |
| 1,350 | | | Term Loan, Maturing June 30, 2014(4) | | | 1,323,000 | | | |
U.S.I. Holdings Corp. |
| 4,702 | | | Term Loan, 3.04%, Maturing May 4, 2014 | | | 4,094,991 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 33,960,873 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Leisure Goods / Activities / Movies — 6.3% |
|
24 Hour Fitness Worldwide, Inc. |
| 1,740 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing June 8, 2012 | | $ | 1,630,161 | | | |
AMC Entertainment, Inc. |
| 5,000 | | | Term Loan, 1.74%, Maturing January 26, 2013 | | | 4,733,995 | | | |
Bombardier Recreational Products |
| 5,651 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing June 28, 2013 | | | 3,969,570 | | | |
Carmike Cinemas, Inc. |
| 1,955 | | | Term Loan, 3.54%, Maturing May 19, 2012 | | | 1,897,567 | | | |
| 2,153 | | | Term Loan, 4.24%, Maturing May 19, 2012 | | | 2,090,234 | | | |
Cedar Fair, L.P. |
| 1,013 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing August 30, 2012 | | | 975,869 | | | |
| 3,674 | | | Term Loan, 4.24%, Maturing February 17, 2014 | | | 3,563,302 | | | |
Cinemark, Inc. |
| 9,294 | | | Term Loan, 2.07%, Maturing October 5, 2013 | | | 8,839,656 | | | |
Deluxe Entertainment Services |
| 1,627 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing January 28, 2011 | | | 1,520,851 | | | |
| 96 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing January 28, 2011 | | | 90,187 | | | |
| 168 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing January 28, 2011 | | | 156,628 | | | |
DW Funding, LLC |
| 1,304 | | | Term Loan, 2.17%, Maturing April 30, 2011 | | | 1,140,677 | | | |
Easton-Bell Sports, Inc. |
| 2,556 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing March 16, 2012 | | | 2,424,730 | | | |
Fender Musical Instruments Corp. |
| 309 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 9, 2014 | | | 264,537 | | | |
| 613 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 9, 2014 | | | 523,717 | | | |
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Holdings, Inc. |
| 12,774 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing April 8, 2012(5) | | | 7,351,667 | | | |
National CineMedia, LLC |
| 2,700 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing February 13, 2015 | | | 2,526,187 | | | |
Regal Cinemas Corp. |
| 7,994 | | | Term Loan, 4.03%, Maturing November 10, 2010 | | | 7,940,532 | | | |
Revolution Studios Distribution Co., LLC |
| 3,530 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing December 21, 2014 | | | 3,212,298 | | | |
| 2,825 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 7.25%, Maturing June 21, 2015 | | | 1,624,375 | | | |
Six Flags Theme Parks, Inc. |
| 5,159 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing April 30, 2015 | | | 5,060,059 | | | |
Southwest Sports Group, LLC |
| 3,725 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing December 22, 2010 | | | 3,129,000 | | | |
Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. |
| 6,256 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing June 9, 2011 | | | 6,240,433 | | | |
| 6,075 | | | Term Loan, Maturing November 6, 2014(4) | | | 5,983,875 | | | |
Zuffa, LLC |
| 2,987 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing June 20, 2016 | | | 2,696,012 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 79,586,119 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lodging and Casinos — 3.8% |
|
Ameristar Casinos, Inc. |
| 3,489 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing November 10, 2012 | | $ | 3,468,711 | | | |
Choctaw Resort Development Enterprise |
| 895 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing November 4, 2011 | | | 890,371 | | | |
Full Moon Holdco 3, Ltd. |
GBP | 500 | | | Term Loan, 3.86%, Maturing November 20, 2014 | | | 719,414 | | | |
GBP | 500 | | | Term Loan, 4.36%, Maturing November 20, 2015 | | | 719,415 | | | |
See notes to financial statements26
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Lodging and Casinos (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Green Valley Ranch Gaming, LLC |
| 1,619 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing February 16, 2014 | | $ | 1,143,523 | | | |
Harrah’s Operating Co. |
| 1,622 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing January 28, 2015 | | | 1,294,332 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan, 9.50%, Maturing October 31, 2016 | | | 979,722 | | | |
Herbst Gaming, Inc. |
| 2,438 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing December 2, 2011(5) | | | 1,355,375 | | | |
| 4,529 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing December 2, 2011(5) | | | 2,517,425 | | | |
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. |
| 1,281 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing November 30, 2013 | | | 1,205,704 | | | |
| 1,699 | | | Term Loan, 1.99%, Maturing November 30, 2013 | | | 1,599,394 | | | |
| 4,247 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing November 30, 2013 | | | 3,998,486 | | | |
LodgeNet Entertainment Corp. |
| 4,344 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing April 4, 2014 | | | 3,989,547 | | | |
New World Gaming Partners, Ltd. |
| 667 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing June 30, 2014 | | | 553,173 | | | |
| 3,295 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing June 30, 2014 | | | 2,731,120 | | | |
Penn National Gaming, Inc. |
| 8,919 | | | Term Loan, 2.01%, Maturing October 3, 2012 | | | 8,644,060 | | | |
Venetian Casino Resort/Las Vegas Sands, Inc. |
| 2,824 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 14, 2014 | | | 2,305,294 | | | |
| 11,183 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 23, 2014 | | | 9,127,797 | | | |
Wimar OpCo, LLC |
| 2,152 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing January 3, 2012(5) | | | 687,607 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 47,930,470 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Nonferrous Metals / Minerals — 1.0% |
|
Euramax International, Inc. |
EUR | 707 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | $ | 629,383 | | | |
| 1,079 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 652,545 | | | |
EUR | 702 | | | Term Loan, 14.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013(2) | | | 624,824 | | | |
| 1,059 | | | Term Loan, 14.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013(2) | | | 640,543 | | | |
Noranda Aluminum Acquisition |
| 1,144 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing May 18, 2014 | | | 929,293 | | | |
Novelis, Inc. |
| 1,931 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing June 28, 2014 | | | 1,743,399 | | | |
| 4,247 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing June 28, 2014 | | | 3,835,590 | | | |
Oxbow Carbon and Mineral Holdings |
| 3,921 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing May 8, 2014 | | | 3,730,288 | | | |
| 374 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing May 8, 2014 | | | 355,821 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,141,686 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas — 2.5% |
|
Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P. |
| 2,207 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing July 20, 2014 | | $ | 2,170,958 | | | |
Big West Oil, LLC |
| 1,054 | | | Term Loan, 4.50%, Maturing May 1, 2014 | | | 1,021,945 | | | |
| 1,324 | | | Term Loan, 4.50%, Maturing May 1, 2014 | | | 1,284,730 | | | |
Dresser, Inc. |
| 4,714 | | | Term Loan, 2.68%, Maturing May 4, 2014 | | | 4,420,251 | | | |
Dynegy Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,050 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing April 2, 2013 | | | 1,011,653 | | | |
| 8,083 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing April 2, 2013 | | | 7,785,695 | | | |
Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. |
| 2,825 | | | Term Loan, 2.21%, Maturing February 8, 2012 | | | 2,739,242 | | | |
Enterprise GP Holdings, L.P. |
| 3,292 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing October 31, 2014 | | | 3,184,768 | | | |
Hercules Offshore, Inc. |
| 4,962 | | | Term Loan, 8.50%, Maturing July 6, 2013 | | | 4,793,329 | | | |
Precision Drilling Corp. |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan, 4.58%, Maturing December 23, 2013 | | | 985,000 | | | |
Targa Resources, Inc. |
| 478 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing October 31, 2012 | | | 470,897 | | | |
| 265 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing October 31, 2012 | | | 260,926 | | | |
Volnay Acquisition Co. |
| 1,989 | | | Term Loan, 3.92%, Maturing January 12, 2014 | | | 1,967,075 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 32,096,469 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Publishing — 8.4% |
|
American Media Operations, Inc. |
| 13,750 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing January 31, 2013(2) | | $ | 12,487,145 | | | |
Aster Zweite Beteiligungs GmbH |
| 2,475 | | | Term Loan, 2.89%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 2,148,300 | | | |
Black Press US Partnership |
| 620 | | | Term Loan, 2.37%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 406,123 | | | |
| 1,021 | | | Term Loan, 2.37%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 668,908 | | | |
CanWest MediaWorks, Ltd. |
| 2,653 | | | Term Loan, 4.75%, Maturing July 10, 2014 | | | 2,135,464 | | | |
Dex Media West, LLC |
| 602 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing October 24, 2014 | | | 532,206 | | | |
GateHouse Media Operating, Inc. |
| 2,062 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 802,445 | | | |
| 4,838 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 1,882,807 | | | |
| 4,225 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 1,644,231 | | | |
Idearc, Inc. |
| 18,830 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing November 17, 2014(5) | | | 8,611,543 | | | |
Laureate Education, Inc. |
| 648 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing August 17, 2014 | | | 590,479 | | | |
| 4,327 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing August 17, 2014 | | | 3,943,946 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing August 31, 2014 | | | 1,000,000 | | | |
See notes to financial statements27
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Publishing (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
MediaNews Group, Inc. |
| 2,164 | | | Term Loan, 4.74%, Maturing August 25, 2010 | | $ | 669,357 | | | |
| 2,181 | | | Term Loan, 4.74%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 674,778 | | | |
Mediannuaire Holding |
EUR | 468 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 497,555 | | | |
EUR | 468 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing October 10, 2015 | | | 497,417 | | | |
Merrill Communications, LLC |
| 5,366 | | | Term Loan, 8.50%, Maturing December 24, 2012 | | | 4,259,289 | | | |
Nelson Education, Ltd. |
| 1,519 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing July 5, 2014 | | | 1,336,720 | | | |
Newspaper Holdings, Inc. |
| 7,911 | | | Term Loan, 1.81%, Maturing July 24, 2014 | | | 4,350,832 | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC |
| 9,994 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing August 9, 2013 | | | 9,327,517 | | | |
| 4,731 | | | Term Loan, 3.99%, Maturing May 1, 2016 | | | 4,450,971 | | | |
Penton Media, Inc. |
| 1,755 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing February 1, 2013 | | | 1,205,101 | | | |
Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC |
| 2,171 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing June 29, 2013(5) | | | 499,430 | | | |
Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. (The) |
| 2,834 | | | DIP Loan, 13.50%, Maturing August 21, 2010 | | | 2,952,318 | | | |
| 4,029 | | | Revolving Loan, 4.54%, Maturing March 3, 2014 | | | 1,980,213 | | | |
| 16,225 | | | Term Loan, 4.25%, Maturing March 3, 2014 | | | 7,974,602 | | | |
| 1,449 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing March 3, 2014 | | | 711,979 | | | |
Source Interlink Companies, Inc. |
| 916 | | | Term Loan, 10.75%, Maturing June 18, 2013 | | | 755,667 | | | |
| 478 | | | Term Loan, 15.00%, Maturing June 18, 2013(2) | | | 167,240 | | | |
Source Media, Inc. |
| 1,995 | | | Term Loan, 5.29%, Maturing November 8, 2011 | | | 1,655,961 | | | |
Star Tribune Co. (The) |
| 251 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing September 28, 2014(7) | | | 199,485 | | | |
| 167 | | | Term Loan, 11.00%, Maturing September 28, 2014(7) | | | 116,429 | | | |
Trader Media Corp. |
GBP | 4,344 | | | Term Loan, 2.64%, Maturing March 23, 2015 | | | 6,104,059 | | | |
Tribune Co. |
| 2,984 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing April 10, 2010(5) | | | 1,390,152 | | | |
| 1,943 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing May 17, 2014(5) | | | 920,690 | | | |
| 7,950 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing May 17, 2014(5) | | | 3,591,879 | | | |
Xsys, Inc. |
| 3,796 | | | Term Loan, 2.89%, Maturing September 27, 2013 | | | 3,294,725 | | | |
| 3,877 | | | Term Loan, 2.89%, Maturing September 27, 2014 | | | 3,365,316 | | | |
EUR | 1,516 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing September 27, 2014 | | | 1,941,470 | | | |
| 1,290 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.18%, Maturing September 27, 2015 | | | 743,958 | | | |
Yell Group, PLC |
| 4,850 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing February 10, 2013 | | | 3,492,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 105,980,707 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Radio and Television — 7.0% |
|
Block Communications, Inc. |
| 1,778 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing December 22, 2011 | | $ | 1,644,843 | | | |
Citadel Broadcasting Corp. |
| 11,850 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 12, 2014 | | | 8,161,688 | | | |
CMP Susquehanna Corp. |
| 3,909 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 2,899,152 | | | |
Discovery Communications, Inc. |
| 1,967 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 1,913,306 | | | |
Emmis Operating Co. |
| 3,160 | | | Term Loan, 4.28%, Maturing November 2, 2013 | | | 2,430,852 | | | |
Gray Television, Inc. |
| 3,398 | | | Term Loan, 3.79%, Maturing January 19, 2015 | | | 2,929,034 | | | |
Intelsat Corp. |
| 6,165 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 5,838,380 | | | |
| 6,165 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 5,838,380 | | | |
| 6,167 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 5,840,163 | | | |
Ion Media Networks, Inc. |
| 1,102 | | | DIP Loan, 10.17%, Maturing May 29, 2010(3)(7) | | | 1,734,113 | | | |
| 8,300 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing January 15, 2012(5) | | | 2,102,664 | | | |
LBI Media, Inc. |
| 1,930 | | | Term Loan, 1.74%, Maturing March 31, 2012 | | | 1,611,550 | | | |
NEP II, Inc. |
| 2,121 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing February 16, 2014 | | | 1,961,547 | | | |
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. |
| 4,456 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing October 1, 2012 | | | 3,999,585 | | | |
| 4,214 | | | Term Loan, 5.01%, Maturing October 1, 2012 | | | 3,781,888 | | | |
Raycom TV Broadcasting, LLC |
| 7,850 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing June 25, 2014 | | | 6,515,500 | | | |
SFX Entertainment |
| 3,411 | | | Term Loan, 3.51%, Maturing June 21, 2013 | | | 3,155,005 | | | |
Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. |
| 6,064 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 10, 2012 | | | 5,033,328 | | | |
Univision Communications, Inc. |
| 22,650 | | | Term Loan, 2.53%, Maturing September 29, 2014 | | | 18,314,133 | | | |
Young Broadcasting, Inc. |
| 3,508 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing November 3, 2012(5) | | | 2,288,823 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 87,993,934 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements28
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Rail Industries — 0.4% |
|
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. |
| 5,108 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing April 26, 2013 | | $ | 4,852,605 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,852,605 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Retailers (Except Food and Drug) — 2.7% |
|
American Achievement Corp. |
| 642 | | | Term Loan, 6.26%, Maturing March 25, 2011 | | $ | 577,819 | | | |
Amscan Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,560 | | | Term Loan, 2.65%, Maturing May 25, 2013 | | | 1,416,999 | | | |
Cumberland Farms, Inc. |
| 4,107 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing September 29, 2013 | | | 3,757,669 | | | |
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. |
| 3,363 | | | Term Loan, 9.75%, Maturing July 15, 2010 | | | 3,375,385 | | | |
Josten’s Corp. |
| 2,393 | | | Term Loan, 2.32%, Maturing October 4, 2011 | | | 2,372,649 | | | |
Mapco Express, Inc. |
| 471 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing April 28, 2011 | | | 435,508 | | | |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. |
| 2,984 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing April 5, 2013 | | | 2,566,743 | | | |
Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. |
| 3,847 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 3,416,173 | | | |
Oriental Trading Co., Inc. |
| 6,547 | | | Term Loan, 9.75%, Maturing July 31, 2013 | | | 5,441,997 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.24%, Maturing January 31, 2013 | | | 242,500 | | | |
Rent-A-Center, Inc. |
| 2,333 | | | Term Loan, 2.00%, Maturing November 15, 2012 | | | 2,286,790 | | | |
Rover Acquisition Corp. |
| 2,925 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing October 26, 2013 | | | 2,820,007 | | | |
Savers, Inc. |
| 1,019 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing August 11, 2012 | | | 983,565 | | | |
| 1,115 | | | Term Loan, 3.00%, Maturing August 11, 2012 | | | 1,076,179 | | | |
Yankee Candle Company, Inc. (The) |
| 4,208 | | | Term Loan, 2.25%, Maturing February 6, 2014 | | | 3,939,750 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 34,709,733 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Steel — 0.2% |
|
Algoma Acquisition Corp. |
| 2,649 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing June 20, 2013 | | $ | 2,500,890 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,500,890 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Surface Transport — 0.4% |
|
Oshkosh Truck Corp. |
| 2,591 | | | Term Loan, 6.32%, Maturing December 6, 2013 | | $ | 2,592,714 | | | |
Swift Transportation Co., Inc. |
| 2,317 | | | Term Loan, 3.56%, Maturing May 10, 2014 | | | 2,001,615 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,594,329 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications — 4.0% |
|
Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc. |
| 5,569 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing February 1, 2012 | | $ | 5,336,477 | | | |
Asurion Corp. |
| 8,525 | | | Term Loan, 3.24%, Maturing July 13, 2012 | | | 8,107,036 | | | |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.74%, Maturing January 13, 2013 | | | 1,904,376 | | | |
BCM Luxembourg, Ltd. |
EUR | 2,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, Maturing March 31, 2016(4) | | | 2,422,967 | | | |
Cellular South, Inc. |
| 3,354 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 29, 2014 | | | 3,219,885 | | | |
| 1,141 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 29, 2014 | | | 1,095,255 | | | |
Centennial Cellular Operating Co., LLC |
| 8,299 | | | Term Loan, 2.24%, Maturing February 9, 2011 | | | 8,264,622 | | | |
CommScope, Inc. |
| 2,661 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing November 19, 2014 | | | 2,579,708 | | | |
Intelsat Subsidiary Holding Co. |
| 2,667 | | | Term Loan, 2.75%, Maturing July 3, 2013 | | | 2,566,884 | | | |
IPC Systems, Inc. |
| 3,336 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing May 31, 2014 | | | 2,852,195 | | | |
GBP | 218 | | | Term Loan, 2.80%, Maturing May 31, 2014 | | | 258,143 | | | |
Macquarie UK Broadcast Ventures, Ltd. |
GBP | 2,508 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing December 26, 2014 | | | 3,560,837 | | | |
NTelos, Inc. |
| 2,000 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing August 13, 2015 | | | 2,014,166 | | | |
Palm, Inc. |
| 2,279 | | | Term Loan, 3.79%, Maturing April 24, 2014 | | | 2,020,271 | | | |
Stratos Global Corp. |
| 2,596 | | | Term Loan, 2.78%, Maturing February 13, 2012 | | | 2,556,805 | | | |
Telesat Canada, Inc. |
| 1,964 | | | Term Loan, 3.25%, Maturing October 22, 2014 | | | 1,889,446 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 50,649,073 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Utilities — 3.6% |
|
AEI Finance Holding, LLC |
| 738 | | | Revolving Loan, 3.24%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | $ | 684,785 | | | |
| 5,001 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing March 30, 2014 | | | 4,638,832 | | | |
BRSP, LLC |
| 1,500 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing June 24, 2014 | | | 1,410,000 | | | |
See notes to financial statements29
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Utilities (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Calpine Corp. |
| 10,962 | | | DIP Loan, 3.17%, Maturing March 29, 2014 | | $ | 10,107,309 | | | |
Covanta Energy Corp. |
| 1,979 | | | Term Loan, 1.75%, Maturing February 9, 2014 | | | 1,885,470 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan, 1.79%, Maturing February 9, 2014 | | | 952,032 | | | |
Electricinvest Holding Co. |
GBP | 600 | | | Term Loan, 5.02%, Maturing October 24, 2012 | | | 787,800 | | | |
EUR | 596 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 4.93%, Maturing October 24, 2012 | | | 701,412 | | | |
NRG Energy, Inc. |
| 6,885 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing June 1, 2014 | | | 6,494,404 | | | |
| 4,706 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing June 1, 2014 | | | 4,439,385 | | | |
TXU Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co., LLC |
| 997 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 777,599 | | | |
| 2,465 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 1,898,137 | | | |
| 10,417 | | | Term Loan, 3.74%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | | 8,097,572 | | | |
Vulcan Energy Corp. |
| 2,185 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing December 31, 2015 | | | 2,208,394 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 45,083,131 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Senior Floating-Rate Interests | | |
(identified cost $1,796,306,966) | | $ | 1,628,986,161 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes — 1.0% |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount*
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Building and Development — 0.6% |
|
Grohe Holding GmbH, Variable Rate |
EUR | 6,500 | | | 3.617%, 1/15/14(8) | | $ | 7,939,556 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,939,556 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics — 0.0% |
|
Wellman Holdings, Inc., Sr. Sub. Notes |
| 679 | | | 5.00%, 1/29/19(7) | | $ | 249,872 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 249,872 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.0% |
|
Environmental Systems Product Holdings, Inc., Junior Notes |
| 75 | | | 18.00%, 3/31/15(2)(7) | | $ | 59,608 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 59,608 | | | |
|
|
|
Electronics / Electrical — 0.2% |
|
NXP BV/NXP Funding, LLC, Variable Rate |
| 2,300 | | | 3.034%, 10/15/13 | | $ | 1,745,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,745,125 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications — 0.2% |
|
Qwest Corp., Sr. Notes, Variable Rate |
| 3,150 | | | 3.549%, 6/15/13 | | $ | 2,945,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,945,250 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes | | |
(identified cost $14,148,320) | | $ | 12,939,411 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Asset-Backed Securities — 0.2% |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 1,598 | | | Assemblies of God Financial Real Estate, Series 2004-1A, Class A, 6.90%, 6/15/29(9)(10) | | $ | 1,538,553 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Carlyle High Yield Partners, Series 2004-6A, Class C, 2.911%, 8/11/16(9)(10) | | | 426,200 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Asset-Backed Securities | | |
(identified cost $2,597,999) | | $ | 1,964,753 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 0.2% |
|
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Automotive — 0.0% |
|
| 133,410 | | | Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.(11) | | $ | 4,789 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,789 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building and Development — 0.1% |
|
| 4,587 | | | Lafarge Roofing(7)(11) | | $ | 0 | | | |
EUR | 154,985 | | | Sanitec Europe Oy B Units(7)(11) | | | 212,118 | | | |
EUR | 154,985 | | | Sanitec Europe Oy E Units (7)(11) | | | 0 | | | |
| 1,646 | | | United Subcontractors, Inc.(7)(11) | | | 132,696 | | | |
| 7,595 | | | WCI Communities, Inc.(11) | | | 531,667 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 876,481 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements30
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics — 0.0% |
|
| 3,877 | | | Vita Cayman II, Ltd. | | $ | 165,462 | | | |
| 662 | | | Wellman Holdings, Inc.(7)(11) | | | 237,718 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 403,180 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.0% |
|
| 1,242 | | | Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc.(7)(11)(12) | | $ | 17,301 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 17,301 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Service — 0.1% |
|
| 66,567 | | | Buffets, Inc.(11) | | $ | 432,686 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 432,686 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Investment Services — 0.0% |
|
| 20,048 | | | Safelite Realty Corp.(7)(12) | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Publishing — 0.0% |
|
| 2,290 | | | Source Interlink Companies, Inc.(7)(11) | | $ | 16,488 | | | |
| 6,089 | | | Star Tribune Co. (The)(7)(11) | | | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 16,488 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $2,761,888) | | $ | 1,750,925 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Preferred Stocks — 0.0% |
|
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Automotive — 0.0% |
|
| 445 | | | Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc., Series A, Convertible(11)(12) | | $ | 116 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 116 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics — 0.0% |
|
| 217 | | | Key Plastics, LLC, Series A(7)(11)(12) | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.0% |
|
| 569 | | | Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc., Series A(7)(11)(12) | | $ | 45,520 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 45,520 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Preferred Stocks | | |
(identified cost $249,639) | | $ | 45,636 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants — 0.0% |
|
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Commercial Services — 0.0% |
|
| 4,437 | | | Citation A14 Expires 4/6/12(7)(11) | | $ | 0 | | | |
| 6,545 | | | Citation B18 Expires 4/6/12(7)(11) | | | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Manufacturing — 0.0% |
|
| 940 | | | Genetek, Inc., Class C Expires 10/31/10(11)(12) | | $ | 47,752 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 47,752 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Warrants (identified cost $0) | | $ | 47,752 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements31
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 2.0% |
|
Interest/
| | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 21,898 | | | Cash Management Portfolio, 0.00%(13) | | $ | 21,898,256 | | | |
| 3,803 | | | State Street Bank and Trust Euro Time Deposit, 0.01%, 11/1/09 | | | 3,803,057 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $25,701,313) | | $ | 25,701,313 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 132.3% | | |
(identified cost $1,841,766,125) | | $ | 1,671,435,951 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Less Unfunded Loan Commitments — (1.4)% | | $ | (17,156,582 | ) | | |
|
|
| | |
Net Investments — 130.9% | | |
(identified cost $1,824,609,543) | | $ | 1,654,279,369 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (30.9)% | | $ | (390,751,232 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 1,263,528,137 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets applicable to common shares.
DIP - Debtor in Possession
REIT - Real Estate Investment Trust
EUR - Euro
GBP - British Pound Sterling
| | |
* | | In U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. |
|
(1) | | Senior floating-rate interests (Senior Loans) often require prepayments from excess cash flows or permit the borrowers to repay at their election. The degree to which borrowers repay, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, cannot be predicted with accuracy. As a result, the actual remaining maturity may be substantially less than the stated maturities shown. However, Senior Loans will have an expected average life of approximately two to four years. The stated interest rate represents the weighted average interest rate of all contracts within the senior loan facility and includes commitment fees on unfunded loan commitments, if any. Senior Loans typically have rates of interest which are redetermined either daily, monthly, quarterly or semi-annually by reference to a base lending rate, plus a premium. These base rates are primarily the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and secondarily, the prime rate offered by one or more major United States banks (the “Prime Rate”) and the certificate of deposit (“CD”) rate or other base lending rates used by commercial lenders. |
|
(2) | | Represents a payment-in-kind security which may pay all or a portion of interest in additional par. |
| | |
(3) | | Unfunded or partially unfunded loan commitments. See Note 1G for description. |
|
(4) | | This Senior Loan will settle after October 31, 2009, at which time the interest rate will be determined. |
|
(5) | | Currently the issuer is in default with respect to interest payments. |
|
(6) | | Defaulted matured security. |
|
(7) | | Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees. |
|
(8) | | Security exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, which exempts from registration securities offered and sold outside the United States. Security may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. |
|
(9) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $1,964,753 or 0.2% of the Portfolio’s net assets. |
|
(10) | | Variable rate security. The stated interest rate represents the rate in effect at October 31, 2009. |
|
(11) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(12) | | Restricted security (see Note 5). |
|
(13) | | Affiliated investment company available to Eaton Vance portfolios and funds which invests in high quality, U.S. dollar denominated money market instruments. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield as of October 31, 2009. |
See notes to financial statements32
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Unaffiliated investments, at value (identified cost, $1,802,711,287) | | $ | 1,632,381,113 | | | |
Affiliated investment, at value (identified cost, $21,898,256) | | | 21,898,256 | | | |
Cash | | | 66,737 | | | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $10,025,086) | | | 9,989,534 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 6,450,443 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 13,251,881 | | | |
Receivable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 447,868 | | | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 1,172,889 | | | |
Other assets | | | 20,422 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 1,685,679,143 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Notes payable | | $ | 365,000,000 | | | |
Payable for investments purchased | | | 55,387,220 | | | |
Payable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 194,259 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 658,432 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 4,208 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 906,887 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 422,151,006 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets applicable to investors’ interest in Portfolio | | $ | 1,263,528,137 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Net proceeds from capital contributions and withdrawals | | $ | 1,433,149,630 | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | | (169,621,493 | ) | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 1,263,528,137 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 87,263,069 | | | |
Interest income allocated from affiliated investment | | | 123,081 | | | |
Expenses allocated from affiliated investment | | | (73,586 | ) | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 87,312,564 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 6,762,214 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 50,708 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 737,885 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 535,449 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 14,267,577 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 98,430 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 22,452,263 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 5,091 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 5,091 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 22,447,172 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 64,865,392 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | (124,832,232 | ) | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (14,341,382 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (139,173,614 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 434,266,265 | | | |
Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | (2,349,086 | ) | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 431,917,179 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 292,743,565 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 357,608,957 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements33
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 64,865,392 | | | $ | 128,205,031 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment transactions, swap contracts, and foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions | | | (139,173,614 | ) | | | (20,751,451 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments, foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 431,917,179 | | | | (569,535,361 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 357,608,957 | | | $ | (462,081,781 | ) | | |
|
|
Capital transactions — | | | | | | | | | | |
Contributions | | $ | 39,030,192 | | | $ | 1,858,796,192 | | | |
Withdrawals | | | (252,416,134 | ) | | | (2,611,778,134 | ) | | |
|
|
Net decrease from capital transactions | | $ | (213,385,942 | ) | | $ | (752,981,942 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 144,223,015 | | | $ | (1,215,063,723 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 1,119,305,122 | | | $ | 2,334,368,845 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 1,263,528,137 | | | $ | 1,119,305,122 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Cash Flows From
| | Year Ended
| | | |
Operating Activities | | October 31, 2009 | | | |
|
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 357,608,957 | | | |
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | | |
Investments purchased | | | (446,051,785 | ) | | |
Investments sold and principal repayments | | | 554,975,408 | | | |
Increase in short term investments, net | | | 16,474,272 | | | |
Net accretion/amortization of premium (discount) | | | (8,130,714 | ) | | |
Amorization of structuring and renewal fees | | | 3,079,121 | | | |
Decrease in interest receivable | | | 6,498,033 | | | |
Decrease in interest receivable from affiliated investment | | | 23,154 | | | |
Decrease in receivable for investments sold | | | 11,776,718 | | | |
Decrease in receivable for open forward foreign currency contracts | | | 2,502,552 | | | |
Decrease in prepaid expenses | | | 103,208 | | | |
Increase in other assets | | | (20,422 | ) | | |
Increase in payable for investments purchased | | | 51,559,852 | | | |
Increase in payable for open forward foreign currency contracts | | | 194,259 | | | |
Decrease in payable for closed swap contracts | | | (14,664 | ) | | |
Increase in payable to affiliate for investment adviser fee | | | 59,505 | | | |
Increase in payable to affiliate for Trustees’ fees | | | 208 | | | |
Decrease in accrued expenses | | | (855,616 | ) | | |
Decrease in unfunded loan commitments | | | (3,629,002 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments | | | (434,266,265 | ) | | |
Net realized (gain) loss from investments | | | 124,832,232 | | | |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 236,719,011 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
Proceeds from notes payable | | $ | 160,000,000 | | | |
Repayments of notes payable | | | (175,000,000 | ) | | |
Proceeds from capital contributions | | | 68,927,813 | | | |
Payments for capital withdrawals | | | (282,313,755 | ) | | |
Payment of structuring and renewal fees on notes payable | | | (4,200,000 | ) | | |
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities | | $ | (232,585,942 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net decrease in cash* | | $ | 4,133,069 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Cash at beginning of year(1) | | $ | 5,923,202 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Cash at end of year(1) | | $ | 10,056,271 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
Cash paid for interest and fees on borrowings | | $ | 16,298,339 | | | |
|
|
(1) Balance includes foreign currency, at value.
| |
* | Includes net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on foreign currency of $(15,469). |
See notes to financial statements34
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Supplementary Data
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | Year Ended November 30, | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | October 31, 2007(1) | | | 2006 | | | 2005 | | | 2004 | | | |
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees(2) | | | 0.76 | % | | | 0.66 | % | | | 0.58 | %(3) | | | 0.51 | % | | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.50 | % | | |
Interest and fee expense | | | 1.31 | % | | | 0.98 | % | | | 0.70 | %(3) | | | 0.01 | % | | | 0.00 | %(4) | | | 0.00 | %(4) | | |
Total expenses | | | 2.07 | % | | | 1.64 | % | | | 1.28 | %(3) | | | 0.52 | % | | | 0.50 | % | | | 0.51 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.97 | % | | | 7.01 | % | | | 7.18 | %(3) | | | 6.57 | % | | | 5.00 | % | | | 3.82 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 32 | % | | | 7 | % | | | 55 | %(5) | | | 51 | % | | | 65 | % | | | 87 | % | | |
|
|
Total Return | | | 38.19 | % | | | (26.81 | )% | | | 3.89 | %(5) | | | 6.88 | % | | | 5.27 | % | | | 6.15 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 1,263,528 | | | $ | 1,119,305 | | | $ | 2,334,369 | | | $ | 2,645,798 | | | $ | 3,054,390 | | | $ | 3,340,152 | | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the eleven months ended October 31, 2007. |
|
(2) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(3) | | Annualized. |
|
(4) | | Rounds to less than 0.01%. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
See notes to financial statements35
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Senior Debt Portfolio (the Portfolio) is a New York trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Portfolio’s investment objective is to provide a high level of current income. The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue interests in the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund held a 99.9% interest in the Portfolio.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Portfolio. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Portfolio’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Portfolio’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Interests in senior floating-rate loans (Senior Loans) for which reliable market quotations are readily available are valued generally at the average mean of bid and ask quotations obtained from a third party pricing service. Other Senior Loans are valued at fair value by the investment adviser under procedures approved by the Trustees. In fair valuing a Senior Loan, the investment adviser utilizes one or more of the valuation techniques described in (i) through (iii) below to assess the likelihood that the borrower will make a full repayment of the loan underlying such Senior Loan relative to yields on other Senior Loans issued by companies of comparable credit quality. If the investment adviser believes that there is a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using a matrix pricing approach that considers the yield on the Senior Loan. If the investment adviser believes there is not a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using analyses that include, but are not limited to: (i) a comparison of the value of the borrower’s outstanding equity and debt to that of comparable public companies; (ii) a discounted cash flow analysis; or (iii) when the investment adviser believes it is likely that a borrower will be liquidated or sold, an analysis of the terms of such liquidation or sale. In certain cases, the investment adviser will use a combination of analytical methods to determine fair value, such as when only a portion of a borrower’s assets are likely to be sold. In conducting its assessment and analyses for purposes of determining fair value of a Senior Loan, the investment adviser will use its discretion and judgment in considering and appraising relevant factors. Fair value determinations are made by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio based on information available to such managers. The portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may not possess the same information about a Senior Loan borrower as the portfolio managers of the Portfolio. At times, the fair value of a Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may vary from the fair value of the same Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of the Portfolio. The fair value of each Senior Loan is periodically reviewed and approved by the investment adviser’s Valuation Committee and by the Trustees based upon procedures approved by the Trustees. Junior Loans are valued in the same manner as Senior Loans.
Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of the average bid and average asked prices that are reported by currency dealers to a third party pricing service at the valuation time. Such third party pricing service valuations are supplied for specific settlement periods and the Portfolio’s forward foreign currency exchange contracts are valued at an interpolated rate between the closest preceding and subsequent settlement period reported by the third party pricing service. Credit default swaps are normally valued using valuations
36
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
provided by a third party pricing service. The pricing services employ electronic data processing techniques to determine the present value based on credit spread quotations obtained from broker/dealers and expected default recovery rates determined by the pricing service using proprietary models. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Portfolio in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Portfolio might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
The Portfolio may invest in Cash Management Portfolio (Cash Management), an affiliated investment company managed by Boston Management and Research (BMR), a subsidiary of Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Cash Management generally values its investment securities utilizing the amortized cost valuation technique permitted by Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, pursuant to which Cash Management must comply with certain conditions. This technique involves initially valuing a portfolio security at its cost and thereafter assuming a constant amortization to maturity of any discount or premium. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate fair value, Cash Management may value its investment securities in the same manner as debt obligations described above.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount. Fees associated with loan amendments are recognized immediately.
D Federal Taxes — The Portfolio has elected to be treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. No provision is made by the Portfolio for federal or state taxes on any taxable income of the Portfolio because each investor in the Portfolio is ultimately responsible for the payment of any taxes on its share of taxable income. Since at least one of the Portfolio’s investors is a regulated investment company that invests all or substantially all of its assets in the Portfolio, the Portfolio normally must satisfy the applicable source of income and diversification requirements (under the Internal Revenue Code) in order for its investors to satisfy them. The Portfolio will allocate, at least annually among its investors, each investor’s distributive share of the Portfolio’s net investment income, net realized capital gains and any other items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit.
As of October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Portfolio’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Portfolio. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Portfolio maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Portfolio’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
F Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
37
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
G Unfunded Loan Commitments — The Portfolio may enter into certain credit agreements all or a portion of which may be unfunded. The Portfolio is obligated to fund these commitments at the borrower’s discretion. The commitments are disclosed in the accompanying Portfolio of Investments.
H Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
I Indemnifications — Under the Portfolio’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Portfolio. Interestholders in the Portfolio are jointly and severally liable for the liabilities and obligations of the Portfolio in the event that the Portfolio fails to satisfy such liabilities and obligations; provided, however, that, to the extent assets are available in the Portfolio, the Portfolio may, under certain circumstances, indemnify interestholders from and against any claim or liability to which such holder may become subject by reason of being or having been an interestholder in the Portfolio. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Portfolio enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Portfolio’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Portfolio that have not yet occurred.
J Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts — The Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. The Portfolio may enter into forward contracts for hedging purposes as well as non-hedging purposes. The forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any gains or losses are recorded as unrealized until such time as the contracts have been closed or offset by another contract with the same broker for the same settlement date and currency. Risks may arise upon entering these contracts from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts and from movements in the value of a foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar.
K Credit Default Swaps — The Portfolio may enter into credit default swap contacts to manage its credit risk, to gain exposure to a credit in which the Portfolio may otherwise invest, or to enhance return. When the Portfolio is the buyer of a credit default swap contract, the Portfolio is entitled to receive the par (or other agreed-upon) value of a referenced debt obligation (or basket of debt obligations) from the counterparty to the contract if a credit event by a third party, such as a U.S. or foreign corporate issuer or sovereign issuer, on the debt obligation occurs. In return, the Portfolio pays the counterparty a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no credit event has occurred. If no credit event occurs, the Portfolio would have spent the stream of payments and received no benefits from the contract. When the Portfolio is the seller of a credit default swap contract, it receives the stream of payments, but is obligated to pay to the buyer of the protection an amount up to the notional amount of the swap and in certain instances take delivery of securities of the reference entity upon the occurrence of a credit event, as defined under the terms of that particular swap agreement. Credit events are contract specific but may include bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration and repudiation/moratorium. If the Portfolio is the seller of protection and a credit event occurs, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Portfolio could be required to make would be an amount equal to the notional amount of the agreement. This potential amount would be partially offset by any recovery value of the respective referenced obligation, or net amount received from the settlement of a buy protection credit default swap agreement entered into by the Portfolio for the same referenced obligation. As the seller, the Portfolio effectively adds leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, the Portfolio is subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap. The interest fee paid or received on the swap contract, which is based on a specified interest rate on a fixed notional amount, is accrued daily as a component of unrealized appreciation (depreciation) and is recorded as realized gain upon receipt or realized loss upon payment. The Portfolio also records an increase or decrease to unrealized appreciation (depreciation) in an amount equal to the daily valuation. Up-front payments or receipts, if any, are recorded as other assets or other liabilities, respectively, and amortized over the life of the swap contract as realized gains or losses. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to the notional amount of the credit default swaps of which it is the seller. The Portfolio segregates assets in the form of cash or liquid securities in an amount equal to any unrealized depreciation of the credit default swaps of which it is the buyer, marked to market on a daily basis. These transactions involve certain risks, including the risk that the seller may be unable to fulfill the transaction.
L Statement of Cash Flows — The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Portfolio is the amount included in the Portfolio’s Statement of Assets
38
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
and Liabilities and represents the cash on hand at its custodian and does not include any short-term investments.
2 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by BMR as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Portfolio. Pursuant to the investment advisory agreement and subsequent fee reduction agreements between the Portfolio and BMR, the fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.50% of the Portfolio’s average daily gross assets up to and including $1 billion, 0.45% over $1 billion up to and including $2 billion, and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. The fee reduction cannot be terminated without the consent of the Trustees and shareholders. The portion of the adviser fee payable by Cash Management on the Portfolio’s investment of cash therein is credited against the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee totaled $6,831,888 of which $69,674 was allocated from Cash Management and $6,762,214 was paid or accrued directly by the Portfolio. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Portfolio’s investment adviser fee, including the portion allocated from Cash Management, was 0.63% of the Portfolio’s average daily net assets.
Except for Trustees of the Portfolio who are not members of EVM’s or BMR’s organizations, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Portfolio out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Portfolio who are not affiliated with the investment adviser may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Portfolio are officers of the above organizations.
3 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations and including maturities, paydowns and principal repayments on Senior Loans, aggregated $446,051,785 and $554,986,152, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
4 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Portfolio at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 1,825,083,895 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 17,119,667 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (187,924,193 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (170,804,526 | ) | | |
|
|
The net unrealized appreciation on foreign currency at October 31, 2009 on a federal income tax basis was $708,681.
5 Restricted Securities
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio owned the following securities (representing less than 0.1% of net assets) which were restricted as to public resale and not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (excluding Rule 144A securities). The Portfolio has various registration rights (exercisable under a variety of circumstances) with respect to these securities. The value of these securities is determined based on valuations provided by brokers when available, or if not available, they are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Date of
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Acquisition | | | Shares | | | Cost | | | Value | | | |
|
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc. | | | 10/24/00 | | | | 1,242 | | | $ | 0 | (1) | | $ | 17,301 | | | |
Safelite Realty Corp. | | | 9/29/00– 11/10/00 | | | | 20,048 | | | | 0 | (1) | | | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 17,301 | | | |
|
|
Preferred Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Environmental Systems Products Holdings, Inc., Series A | | | 10/25/07 | | | | 569 | | | $ | 9,958 | | | $ | 45,520 | | | |
Hayes Lemmerz International, Series A, Convertible | | | 6/04/03 | | | | 445 | | | | 22,250 | | | | 116 | | | |
Key Plastics, LLC, Series A | | | 4/26/01 | | | | 217 | | | | 217,431 | | | | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 249,639 | | | $ | 45,636 | | | |
|
|
Warrants | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Gentek, Inc., Class C, Expires 10/31/10 | | | 11/11/03 | | | | 940 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 47,752 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 47,752 | | | |
|
|
Total Restricted | | | | | | | | | | $ | 249,639 | | | $ | 110,689 | | | |
|
|
39
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
6 Financial Instruments
The Portfolio may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include forward foreign currency exchange contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Portfolio has in particular classes of financial instruments and does not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered.
A summary of obligations under these financial instruments at October 31, 2009 is as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
|
Sales |
|
| | | | | | Net Unrealized
| | | |
| | | | | | Appreciation
| | | |
Settlement Date | | Deliver | | In Exchange For | | (Depreciation) | | | |
|
11/30/09 | | British Pound Sterling 28,520,600 | | United States Dollar 46,606,938 | | $ | (194,259 | ) | | |
11/30/09 | | Euro 78,198,693 | | United States Dollar 115,503,380 | | | 429,244 | | | |
11/30/09 | | Euro 745,000 | | United States Dollar 1,114,937 | | | 18,624 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 253,609 | | | |
|
|
At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had sufficient cash and/or securities to cover commitments under these contracts.
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 815-10), effective May 1, 2009. Such standard requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about the objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk related contingent features in derivative instruments. The disclosure below includes additional information as a result of implementing FAS 161.
The Portfolio is subject to foreign exchange risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objective. Because the Portfolio holds foreign currency denominated investments, the value of these investments and related receivables and payables may change due to future changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To hedge against this risk, the Portfolio may enter into forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The Portfolio may also enter into such contracts to hedge currency risk of investments it anticipates purchasing.
The forward foreign currency exchange contracts in which the Portfolio invests are subject to the risk that the counterparty to the contract fails to perform its obligations under the contract. At October 31, 2009, the maximum amount of loss the Fund would incur due to counterparty risk was $447,868, representing the fair value of such derivatives in an asset position.
The fair value of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) and whose primary underlying risk exposure is foreign exchange risk at October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value | | | |
| | |
Derivative | | Asset Derivatives | | | Liability Derivatives | | | |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | $ | 447,868(1 | ) | | $ | (194,259 | )(2) | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Receivable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts; Net unrealized depreciation. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Assets and Liabilities location: Payable for open forward foreign currency exchange contracts; Net unrealized depreciation. |
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is foreign exchange risk for the six months ended October 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Change in
| | | |
| | | | | Unrealized
| | | |
| | Realized Gain
| | | Appreciation
| | | |
| | (Loss) on
| | | (Depreciation) on
| | | |
| | Derivatives
| | | Derivatives
| | | |
| | Recognized in
| | | Recognized in
| | | |
Derivative | | Income | | | Income | | | |
|
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | $ | (15,215,632 | )(1) | | $ | 1,314,528(2 | ) | | |
| | |
(1) | | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contract transactions. |
|
(2) | | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Foreign currency and forward foreign currency exchange contracts. |
The average notional amount of forward foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding during the six months ended October 31, 2009, which is indicative of the volume of this derivative type, was approximately $143,501,000.
7 Revolving Credit and Security Agreement
The Portfolio has entered into a Revolving Credit Agreement, as amended (the Agreement) with conduit lenders and a bank that allows it to borrow up to
40
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
$400 million ($600 million prior to February 12, 2009 and $800 million prior to December 29, 2008) and to invest the borrowings in accordance with its investment practices. Borrowings under the Agreement are secured by the assets of the Portfolio. Interest is charged at a rate above the conduits’ commercial paper issuance rate and is payable monthly. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Portfolio also pays a program fee of 0.75% (1.50% prior to September 8, 2009 and 0.325% prior to February 12, 2009) per annum on its outstanding borrowings to administer the facility and a commitment fee of 0.50% (1.25% prior to September 8, 2009, 1.50% prior to April 28, 2009 and 0.175% prior to February 12, 2009) per annum on the amount of the facility. Program and commitment fees for the year ended October 31, 2009 totaled $7,188,822 and are included in interest expense in the Statement of Operations. The Portfolio also paid a renewal fee of $4 million which is being amortized to interest expense over one year through February 10, 2010, the expiration date of the Agreement. The unamortized balance at October 31, 2009 is approximately $1,121,000 and is included in prepaid expenses on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. In connection with the structuring of the Agreement, the Portfolio is obligated to pay a fee of $1 million in quarterly installments of $50,000 through February 2012, of which $450,000 remains outstanding at October 31, 2009. The entire unpaid balance is payable on termination date if the Agreement is terminated by the Portfolio within the first five years and eliminated if the Agreement is terminated by the lenders at their discretion except for an event of default by the Portfolio. At October 31, 2009, the Portfolio had borrowings outstanding under the Agreement of $365,000,000 at an interest rate of 0.38%. The carrying amount of the borrowings at October 31, 2009 approximated fair value. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the average borrowings under the Agreement and the average interest rate were $325,027,397 and 1.23%, respectively.
8 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by companies whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Portfolio, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign securities markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
9 Concentration of Credit Risk
The Portfolio invests primarily in below investment grade floating-rate loans and floating-rate debt obligations, which are considered speculative because of the credit risk of their issuers. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances are more likely to reduce the capacity of issuers of these securities to make principal and interest payments. Such companies are more likely to default on their payments of interest and principal owed than issuers of investment grade bonds. An economic downturn generally leads to a higher non-payment rate, and a loan or other debt obligation may lose significant value before a default occurs. Lower rated investments also may be subject to greater price volatility than higher rated investments. Moreover, the specific collateral used to secure a loan may decline in value or become illiquid, which would adversely affect the loan’s value.
10 Fair Value Measurements
The Portfolio adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB ASC 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Portfolio’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
41
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Senior Floating-Rate Interests (less unfunded loan commitments) | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,609,334,717 | | | $ | 2,494,862 | | | $ | 1,611,829,579 | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes | | | — | | | | 12,629,931 | | | | 309,480 | | | | 12,939,411 | | | |
Asset-Backed Securities | | | — | | | | 1,964,753 | | | | — | | | | 1,964,753 | | | |
Common Stocks | | | 4,789 | | | | 1,129,815 | | | | 616,321 | | | | 1,750,925 | | | |
Preferred Stocks | | | — | | | | 116 | | | | 45,520 | | | | 45,636 | | | |
Warrants | | | — | | | | 47,752 | | | | 0 | | | | 47,752 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | 21,898,256 | | | | 3,803,057 | | | | — | | | | 25,701,313 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 21,903,045 | | | $ | 1,628,910,141 | | | $ | 3,466,183 | | | $ | 1,654,279,369 | | | |
|
|
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | $ | — | | | $ | 447,868 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 447,868 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 21,903,045 | | | $ | 1,629,358,009 | | | $ | 3,466,183 | | | $ | 1,654,727,237 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Liability Description | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | $ | — | | | $ | (194,259 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (194,259 | ) | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | — | | | $ | (194,259 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | (194,259 | ) | | |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investments
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | in Senior
| | | Investments
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Floating-
| | | in Corporate
| | | Investments
| | | Investments
| | | | | | | |
| | Rate
| | | Bonds &
| | | in Common
| | | in Preferred
| | | Investments
| | | | |
| | Interests | | | Notes | | | Stocks | | | Stocks | | | in Warrants | | | Total | |
| |
Balance as of October 31, 2008 | | $ | 2,597,076 | | | $ | 53,840 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 13,070 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 2,663,986 | |
Realized gains (losses) | | | (2,603,184 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | (768 | ) | | | — | | | | (2,603,952 | ) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)* | | | 2,213,700 | | | | 23,054 | | | | (26,248 | ) | | | 33,218 | | | | 0 | | | | 2,243,724 | |
Net purchases (sales) | | | 1,246,407 | | | | 206,728 | | | | 642,569 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,095,704 | |
Accrued discount (premium) | | | 13,477 | | | | 25,858 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 39,335 | |
Net transfers to (from) Level 3 | | | (972,614 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (972,614 | ) |
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 | | $ | 2,494,862 | | | $ | 309,480 | | | $ | 616,321 | | | $ | 45,520 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 3,466,183 | |
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments still held as of October 31, 2009* | | $ | 604,335 | | | $ | 23,054 | | | $ | (26,248 | ) | | $ | 33,218 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 634,359 | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount is included in the related amount on investments in the Statement of Operations. |
11 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Portfolio as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 28, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Portfolio’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
42
Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees and Investors of
Senior Debt Portfolio:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Senior Debt Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the periods presented. These financial statements and supplementary data are the responsibility of the Portfolio’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and supplementary data based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and supplementary data are free of material misstatement. The Portfolio is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Portfolio’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities and senior loans owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and selling or agent banks; where replies were not received from brokers and selling or agent banks, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and supplementary data referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Senior Debt Portfolio as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the supplementary data for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 2009
43
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
44
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Senior Debt Portfolio (the “Portfolio”), the portfolio in which Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (the “Fund”) invests, with Boston Management and Research (the “Adviser”), including the fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Portfolio.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Portfolio, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Portfolio by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Portfolio, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Portfolio. In particular, the Board evaluated the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing special considerations relevant to investing in senior floating rate loans. The Board noted the experience of the Adviser’s large group of bank loan investment professionals and other personnel who provide services to the Portfolio, including portfolio managers and analysts. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Portfolio by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following
45
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
In assessing the Fund’s investment performance, the Board noted that the Fund is the successor to the operations of Eaton Vance Prime Rate Reserves (the “Predecessor Fund”), which like the Fund, invested in Senior Debt Portfolio prior to its reorganization into the Fund on March 14, 2008. The Board compared the Predecessor Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund (and the Predecessor Fund). The Board noted that the Predecessor Fund’s and the Fund’s performance relative to its peers was affected by management’s use of leverage as well as its focus on reducing volatility. On the basis of the foregoing, the Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, payable by the Portfolio and the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and total expense ratio of the Fund for the period from inception (March 2008) through September 30, 2008, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the total expense ratio anticipated with respect to the Fund are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Predecessor Fund, the Fund, the Portfolio and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund and the Portfolio.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund and Portfolio increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Predecessor Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Predecessor Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that, assuming reasonably foreseeable increases in the assets of the Portfolio, the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
46
Eaton Vance Floating Rate Advantage Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) and Senior Debt Portfolio (the Portfolio) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s and Portfolio’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust and the Portfolio hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust and the Portfolio, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter, the Portfolio’s placement agent and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President of the Trust | | Trustee since 2007 and President of the Trust since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust and Portfolio. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
47
Eaton Vance Floating Rate Advantage Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Since 1998 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Scott H. Page 11/30/59 | | President of the Portfolio | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 11 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC, Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Craig P. Russ 10/30/63 | | Vice President of the Portfolio | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 6 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
48
Eaton Vance Floating Rate Advantage Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Term of
| | |
| | with the
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | Trust and
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | the Portfolio | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President of the Trust | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Treasurer of the Trust since 2005 and of the Portfolio since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and the Portfolio and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
49
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser of Senior Debt Portfolio
Boston Management and Research
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Administrator of Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Principal Underwriter*
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer Agent
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
EATON VANCE STRUCTURED EMERGING MARKETS FUND |
IMPORTANT NOTICES REGARDING PRIVACY,
DELIVERY OF SHAREHOLDER DOCUMENTS,
PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS AND PROXY VOTING
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/ broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures.
For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise.
If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser.
Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/227b4/227b4a466946b4eb538880d4a11666ff0e91cf4f" alt="(PHOTO OF THOMAS SETO)"
Thomas Seto
Parametric Portfolio
Associates LLC
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | Despite an extremely volatile year, emerging markets generated strong positive performance, as measured by the MSCI Emerging Markets Index (the Index), which recorded a return of 64.13% for the 12 months ending October 31, 2009.1 As the period began late last fall, global equities were already in the midst of a dramatic decline, dragged lower by the failure or near-collapse of several major financial institutions struggling under the enormous weight of troubled assets. On the verge of illiquidity, the credit markets virtually ceased operating, worldwide economic activity ground to a near standstill, and anxious equity investors stayed on the sidelines. At the beginning of the second quarter, however, equity markets began a rally in response to indications that the concerted global effort by world banks to alleviate the credit crisis and stimulate economic growth was succeeding. The volatile period finished on a decidedly positive note, with many market indexes for European, U.S. and Asian equities posting solid annual gains. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/800fa/800fa72f7701dc5c0df5d19254a6b9824e4dbdc4" alt="(PHOTO OF DAVID STEIN)"
David Stein, Ph.D.
Parametric Portfolio
Associates LLC
Co-Portfolio Manager
• | | Against this backdrop, emerging markets fared very well, with some economies proving more resilient to the financial crisis and global recession than anticipated. Equity indexes tracking the performance of emerging markets widely outperformed the 27.71% return of foreign developed markets, as measured by the MSCI Europe, Australasia and Far East Index. |
• | | Top performers in the Index on an absolute-return basis for the year ending October 31, 2009, included Indonesia (+126%), Peru (+117%), Russia (+110%), Colombia (+94%), Brazil (+92%) and China (+83%). The Index’s nearly 20% weighting in China made the most significant contribution to returns, followed by a 15% allocation to Brazil. By contrast, countries such as Pakistan (-44%) and Jordan (-25%) did not fare as well. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Management Discussion
• | | For the year ending October 31, 2009, the Fund recorded a double-digit return, although it under-performed the Index, its primary benchmark, and the S&P/IFCI Emerging Markets Index, its secondary benchmark. Looking at individual countries, China and Brazil had strong positive returns but the Fund’s underweight in both countries detracted from performance relative to the Index. Fund holdings in Nigeria and United Arab Emirates also were a drag on relative performance, as was the Fund’s exposure to Qatar, Jordan, Kuwait, Ghana and Saudi Arabia. Russia and Indonesia were among the top contributors to the Fund’s return, as the Fund was significantly overweighted in both countries versus the Index. An overweight to Argentina, as well as underweightings in Taiwan and Korea, also added to performance. |
|
• | | With any multicountry portfolio, country selection and weighting have the largest effect on the risk and return experience of the Fund’s strategy. Our research into emerging countries has resulted in some important observations. Individually, emerging markets can be volatile, but they also exhibit relatively low correlations among each other and developed markets. We believe that due to this tendency to move relatively |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance | | | | |
10/31/08-10/31/09 | | | | |
|
Class A2 | | | 51.81 | % |
Class C2 | | | 50.69 | |
Class I2 | | | 52.15 | |
MSCI Emerging Markets Index1 | | | 64.13 | |
S&P/IFCI Emerging Markets Index1 | | | 65.33 | |
Lipper Emerging Markets Funds Average1 | | | 56.55 | |
See page 3 for more performance information.
| | |
1 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index or a Lipper Classification. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. MSCI Index returns reflect dividends net of any applicable foreign withholding taxes. The Lipper total return is the average total return, at net asset value, of the funds that are in the same Lipper Classification as the Fund. |
|
2 | | These returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. Absent expense limitations by the adviser, the sub-adviser and the administrator, the returns would be lower. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
1
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
independently, a structured portfolio that balances exposure to a broad array of emerging market countries can substantially reduce volatility compared to the level found in individual countries or more traditionally concentrated active strategies. While during the depths of the global financial crisis, there was a phenomenon where cross-country correlations rose and markets behaved more similarly than usual. However, they reverted to the historic norm of moving independent of each other as markets recovered throughout the year.
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Fund’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
Portfolio Composition
Regional Weightings1
By total common stocks
| | |
1 | | As a percentage of the Fund’s total common stocks as of 10/31/09. |
Sector Weightings2
By net assets
| | |
2 | | As a percentage of the Fund’s net assets as of 10/31/09. Excludes cash equivalents. |
2
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of Class A of the Fund with that of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index and the S&P/IFCI Emerging Markets Index, each an unmanaged index of common stocks traded in emerging markets and available to foreign investors. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of Class A, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index and the S&P/IFCI Emerging Markets Index. Class A total returns are presented at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The table includes the total returns of each Class of the Fund at net asset value and maximum public offering price. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce3a8/ce3a89ad60b2394bd3d05334571e8027ec74cef8" alt="(PERFORMANCE CHART)"
| | |
* | | Source: Lipper, Bloomberg. Class A of the Fund commenced investment operations on 6/30/06. |
|
| | A $10,000 hypothetical investment at net asset value in Class C shares and Class I shares on 6/30/06 (inception date) would have been valued at $12,398 and $12,814, respectively, on 10/31/09. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Indices’ total returns do not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Indices. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance1 | | Class A | | Class C | | Class I |
Share Class Symbol | | EAEMX | | ECEMX | | EIEMX |
|
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) |
One Year | | | 51.81 | % | | | 50.69 | % | | | 52.15 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | 7.48 | | | | 6.65 | | | | 7.71 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
SEC Average Annual Total Returns (including sales charge or applicable CDSC) |
One Year | | | 43.01 | % | | | 49.69 | % | | | 52.15 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | 5.59 | | | | 6.65 | | | | 7.71 | |
| | |
† | | Inception Dates For All Share Classes: 6/30/06 |
|
1 | | Average Annual Total Returns do not include the 5.75% maximum sales charge for Class A shares or the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) for Class C shares. If sales charges were deducted, the returns would be lower. SEC Average Annual Total Returns for Class A reflect the maximum 5.75% sales charge and, for Class C, reflect a 1% CDSC for the first year. Class A and Class I shares are subject to a 1% redemption fee if redeemed or exchanged within 90 days of settlement of purchase. Class I shares are offered to certain investors at net asset value. Absent expense limitations by the adviser, the sub-adviser and the administrator, the returns would be lower. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | Class A | | Class C | | Class I |
|
Gross Expense Ratio | | | 1.72 | % | | | 2.47 | % | | | 1.48 | % |
Net Expense Ratio | | | 1.62 | | | | 2.37 | | | | 1.37 | |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 3/1/09. Net expense ratio reflects a contractual expense limitation that continues through February 28, 2010. Thereafter, the expense limitation may be changed or terminated at any time. Without this expense limitation, expenses would be higher. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or offering price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on purchases and redemption fees (if applicable); and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (May 1, 2009 – October 31, 2009).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads) or redemption fees (if applicable). Therefore, the second section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would be higher.
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (5/1/09) | | | (10/31/09) | | | (5/1/09 – 10/31/09) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,416.90 | | | | $9.75 | ** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,409.90 | | | | $14.27 | ** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,417.50 | | | | $8.23 | ** | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.10 | | | | $8.13 | ** | | |
Class C | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,013.40 | | | | $11.93 | ** | | |
Class I | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.40 | | | | $6.87 | ** | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.60% for Class A shares, 2.35% for Class C shares and 1.35% for Class I shares, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that the $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on April 30, 2009. | |
|
| ** | Absent an expense limitation by affiliates, the expenses would be higher. | |
4
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 97.3% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Argentina — 0.8% |
|
Banco Macro SA, Class B ADR | | | 46,050 | | | $ | 1,346,042 | | | |
BBVA Banco Frances SA ADR | | | 28,788 | | | | 182,228 | | | |
Cresud SA ADR | | | 98,500 | | | | 1,213,520 | | | |
Grupo Financiero Galicia SA, Class B ADR(1) | | | 88,700 | | | | 514,460 | | | |
IRSA Inversiones y Representaciones SA GDR(1) | | | 14,500 | | | | 125,280 | | | |
MercadoLibre, Inc.(1) | | | 41,600 | | | | 1,488,864 | | | |
Petrobras Energia SA ADR | | | 67,925 | | | | 1,163,555 | | | |
Telecom Argentina SA, Class B ADR(1) | | | 119,360 | | | | 2,017,184 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,051,133 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Botswana — 0.7% |
|
Barclays Bank of Botswana | | | 723,650 | | | $ | 708,665 | | | |
Botswana Insurance Holdings Ltd. | | | 326,490 | | | | 400,194 | | | |
First National Bank of Botswana | | | 4,730,800 | | | | 1,875,657 | | | |
Letshego | | | 173,200 | | | | 349,139 | | | |
Sechaba Breweries Ltd. | | | 1,113,200 | | | | 2,172,660 | | | |
Standard Chartered Bank | | | 531,120 | | | | 1,251,744 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,758,059 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Brazil — 6.1% |
|
AES Tiete SA, PFC Shares | | | 32,900 | | | $ | 370,723 | | | |
All America Latina Logistica SA | | | 103,500 | | | | 763,207 | | | |
American Banknote SA | | | 4,700 | | | | 46,957 | | | |
Anhanguera Educacional Participacoes SA(1) | | | 4,800 | | | | 66,349 | | | |
B2W Companhia Global do Varejo | | | 16,970 | | | | 491,298 | | | |
Banco Bradesco SA, PFC Shares | | | 149,150 | | | | 2,926,103 | | | |
Banco do Brasil SA | | | 53,300 | | | | 853,538 | | | |
Banco Nossa Caixa SA | | | 7,500 | | | | 268,307 | | | |
BM&F Bovespa SA | | | 90,251 | | | | 584,049 | | | |
BR Malls Participacoes SA(1) | | | 22,000 | | | | 243,529 | | | |
Bradespar SA, PFC Shares | | | 31,500 | | | | 651,780 | | | |
Brasil Telecom Participacoes SA | | | 7,100 | | | | 130,949 | | | |
Brasil Telecom Participacoes SA, PFC Shares | | | 36,500 | | | | 367,362 | | | |
Brasil Telecom SA, PFC Shares | | | 26,600 | | | | 226,348 | | | |
Braskem SA, PFC Shares | | | 11,460 | | | | 76,114 | | | |
BRF-Brasil Foods SA(1) | | | 59,120 | | | | 1,433,029 | | | |
Centrais Eletricas Brasileiras SA, Class B, PFC Shares | | | 73,400 | | | | 937,500 | | | |
Cia Brasileira de Distribuicao Grupo Pao de Acucar, PFC Shares | | | 29,782 | | | | 901,102 | | | |
Cia Brasileira de Distribuicao Grupo Pao de Acucar, Class B, PFC Shares | | | 1,387 | | | | 41,966 | | | |
Cia de Bebidas das Americas, PFC Shares | | | 33,758 | | | | 3,061,139 | | | |
Cia de Companhia de Concessoes Rodoviarias (CCR) | | | 22,000 | | | | 434,605 | | | |
Cia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo | | | 28,220 | | | | 536,654 | | | |
Cia de Saneamento de Minas Gerais-Copasa MG | | | 3,900 | | | | 69,627 | | | |
Cia de Transmissao de Energia Eletrica Paulista, PFC Shares | | | 8,890 | | | | 245,212 | | | |
Cia Energetica de Minas Gerais, PFC Shares | | | 55,504 | | | | 866,777 | | | |
Cia Energetica de Sao Paulo, PFC Shares | | | 17,500 | | | | 204,643 | | | |
Cia Paranaense de Energia-Copel, PFC Shares | | | 10,100 | | | | 175,729 | | | |
Cia Siderurgica Nacional SA (CSN) | | | 31,600 | | | | 1,045,799 | | | |
Contax Participacoes SA, PFC Shares | | | 1,910 | | | | 85,655 | | | |
Cosan SA Industria e Comercio(1) | | | 40,000 | | | | 421,208 | | | |
CPFL Energia SA | | | 20,600 | | | | 355,495 | | | |
Cyrela Brazil Realty SA | | | 46,000 | | | | 587,534 | | | |
Diagnosticos da America SA(1) | | | 3,800 | | | | 94,051 | | | |
Duratex SA | | | 39,187 | | | | 269,166 | | | |
EDP-Energias do Brasil SA | | | 17,900 | | | | 289,595 | | | |
Eletropaulo Metropolitana SA, Class B, PFC Shares | | | 11,280 | | | | 210,988 | | | |
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica SA(1) | | | 105,700 | | | | 536,420 | | | |
Estacio Participacoes SA | | | 13,900 | | | | 181,483 | | | |
Fertilizantes Fosfatados SA, PFC Shares | | | 25,300 | | | | 240,132 | | | |
Gafisa SA | | | 9,300 | | | | 138,001 | | | |
Gerdau SA | | | 5,000 | | | | 57,249 | | | |
Gerdau SA, PFC Shares | | | 73,200 | | | | 1,092,847 | | | |
GVT Holding SA(1) | | | 22,900 | | | | 655,177 | | | |
Investimentos Itau SA, PFC Shares | | | 335,395 | | | | 1,905,826 | | | |
Itau Unibanco Holding SA, PFC Shares | | | 212,022 | | | | 4,031,981 | | | |
Itausa-Investimentos Itau SA | | | 12,545 | | | | 85,456 | | | |
JBS SA | | | 73,400 | | | | 407,083 | | | |
LLX Logistica SA(1) | | | 90,000 | | | | 356,608 | | | |
Localiza Rent a Car SA | | | 38,100 | | | | 400,119 | | | |
Lojas Americanas SA, PFC Shares | | | 58,370 | | | | 384,362 | | | |
Lojas Renner SA | | | 17,700 | | | | 311,478 | | | |
Lupatech SA(1) | | | 21,200 | | | | 326,857 | | | |
M Dias Branco SA | | | 4,300 | | | | 92,708 | | | |
Marfrig Frigorificos e Comercio de Alimentos SA(1) | | | 48,500 | | | | 556,968 | | | |
Medial Saude SA(1) | | | 12,200 | | | | 99,035 | | | |
Metalurgica Gerdau SA, PFC Shares | | | 19,200 | | | | 348,774 | | | |
MRV Engenharia e Participacoes SA | | | 18,800 | | | | 349,832 | | | |
Natura Cosmeticos SA | | | 15,100 | | | | 270,439 | | | |
Net Servicos de Comunicacao SA, PFC Shares | | | 42,836 | | | | 534,964 | | | |
PDG Realty SA Empreendimentos e Participacoes | | | 10,600 | | | | 89,657 | | | |
Petroleo Brasileiro SA | | | 56,800 | | | | 1,305,858 | | | |
Petroleo Brasileiro SA, PFC Shares | | | 424,800 | | | | 8,449,700 | | | |
Randon Participacoes SA, PFC Shares | | | 21,200 | | | | 161,262 | | | |
Redecard SA | | | 58,200 | | | | 863,947 | | | |
Rossi Residencial SA | | | 39,800 | | | | 266,373 | | | |
Souza Cruz SA | | | 14,600 | | | | 515,509 | | | |
Suzano Papel e Celulose SA | | | 29,300 | | | | 254,479 | | | |
Tam SA, PFC Shares | | | 14,800 | | | | 212,137 | | | |
Tele Norte Leste Participacoes SA | | | 3,700 | | | | 85,065 | | | |
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Brazil (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tele Norte Leste Participacoes SA, PFC Shares | | | 56,900 | | | $ | 1,088,516 | | | |
Telemar Norte Leste SA, PFC Shares | | | 3,500 | | | | 110,309 | | | |
Telesp-Telecomunicacoes de Sao Paulo SA, PFC Shares | | | 9,600 | | | | 238,147 | | | |
Terna Participacoes SA | | | 5,000 | | | | 104,167 | | | |
Tim Participacoes SA, PFC Shares | | | 156,500 | | | | 368,685 | | | |
Totvs SA | | | 3,298 | | | | 179,709 | | | |
Tractebel Energia SA | | | 21,600 | | | | 256,267 | | | |
Ultrapar Participacoes SA, PFC Shares | | | 15,746 | | | | 683,971 | | | |
Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais SA, PFC Shares | | | 30,525 | | | | 797,088 | | | |
Vale SA | | | 47,300 | | | | 1,202,906 | | | |
Vale SA, PFC Shares | | | 276,740 | | | | 6,197,430 | | | |
Vivo Participacoes SA, PFC Shares | | | 23,675 | | | | 580,586 | | | |
Votorantim Celulose e Papel SA(1) | | | 2,457 | | | | 33,892 | | | |
Weg SA | | | 92,300 | | | | 911,683 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 58,655,229 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Bulgaria — 0.4% |
|
Bulgarian American Credit Bank JSCO(1) | | | 5,700 | | | $ | 76,784 | | | |
CB First Investment Bank AD(1) | | | 235,000 | | | | 493,051 | | | |
Central Cooperative Bank AD(1) | | | 227,900 | | | | 251,947 | | | |
Chimimport AD(1) | | | 329,922 | | | | 620,163 | | | |
Corporate Commercial Bank AD(1) | | | 10,400 | | | | 469,778 | | | |
Doverie Holding AD(1) | | | 13,760 | | | | 40,017 | | | |
MonBat AD(1) | | | 60,235 | | | | 317,357 | | | |
Petrol AD(1) | | | 102,500 | | | | 357,142 | | | |
Sopharma AD(1) | | | 354,600 | | | | 1,069,101 | | | |
Vivacom | | | 44,690 | | | | 103,423 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,798,763 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chile — 3.1% |
|
Administradora de Fondos de Pensiones Provida SA | | | 44,300 | | | $ | 115,558 | | | |
AES Gener SA | | | 1,010,500 | | | | 428,218 | | | |
Almendral SA | | | 2,512,600 | | | | 242,529 | | | |
Antarchile SA, Series A | | | 38,340 | | | | 660,723 | | | |
Banco de Chile | | | 13,030,222 | | | | 1,030,736 | | | |
Banco de Chile ADR | | | 2,580 | | | | 119,970 | | | |
Banco de Credito e Inversiones | | | 39,113 | | | | 1,135,194 | | | |
Banco Santander Chile SA | | | 35,182,310 | | | | 1,789,099 | | | |
Banmedica SA | | | 76,180 | | | | 80,492 | | | |
Cap SA | | | 32,412 | | | | 842,425 | | | |
Cencosud SA | | | 561,531 | | | | 1,729,171 | | | |
Cia Cervecerias Unidas SA | | | 82,290 | | | | 580,424 | | | |
Cia General de Electricidad SA | | | 61,050 | | | | 384,617 | | | |
Cia SudAmericana de Vapores SA(1) | | | 350,331 | | | | 288,341 | | | |
Colbun SA | | | 3,335,910 | | | | 785,364 | | | |
Corpbanca SA | | | 58,054,570 | | | | 393,627 | | | |
Embotelladora Andina SA, Class B, PFC Shares | | | 170,541 | | | | 523,234 | | | |
Empresa Nacional de Electricidad SA | | | 1,229,463 | | | | 1,889,522 | | | |
Empresas CMPC SA | | | 41,146 | | | | 1,472,406 | | | |
Empresas Copec SA | | | 203,576 | | | | 2,739,946 | | | |
Empresas La Polar SA | | | 156,400 | | | | 792,383 | | | |
Enersis SA | | | 5,325,221 | | | | 1,891,584 | | | |
ENTEL SA | | | 51,500 | | | | 684,791 | | | |
Grupo Security SA | | | 1,212,785 | | | | 338,059 | | | |
Invercap SA | | | 19,700 | | | | 163,255 | | | |
Inversiones Aguas Metropolitanas SA | | | 306,600 | | | | 362,065 | | | |
Lan Airlines SA | | | 65,195 | | | | 874,506 | | | |
Madeco SA | | | 5,047,652 | | | | 327,986 | | | |
Masisa SA | | | 444,800 | | | | 65,771 | | | |
Minera Valparaiso SA | | | 12,324 | | | | 371,380 | | | |
Parque Arauco SA | | | 452,000 | | | | 468,302 | | | |
Quinenco SA | | | 162,900 | | | | 322,149 | | | |
Ripley Corp. SA | | | 264,000 | | | | 200,380 | | | |
S.A.C.I. Falabella SA | | | 506,600 | | | | 2,431,814 | | | |
Salfacorp SA | | | 170,000 | | | | 294,887 | | | |
Sigdo Koppers SA | | | 176,300 | | | | 154,402 | | | |
SM-Chile SA, Class B | | | 2,424,500 | | | | 279,917 | | | |
Sociedad de Inversiones Oro Blanco SA | | | 13,300,000 | | | | 192,881 | | | |
Sociedad de Inversiones Pampa Calichera SA, Class A | | | 244,730 | | | | 384,875 | | | |
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, Series B | | | 38,540 | | | | 1,415,444 | | | |
Sonda SA | | | 381,500 | | | | 525,959 | | | |
Vina Concha y Toro SA | | | 255,010 | | | | 540,326 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 30,314,712 | | | |
|
|
|
|
China — 6.4% |
|
Agile Property Holdings, Ltd. | | | 200,000 | | | $ | 255,481 | | | |
Air China, Ltd., Class H(1) | | | 520,000 | | | | 281,478 | | | |
Alibaba.com Ltd. | | | 161,000 | | | | 371,757 | | | |
Aluminum Corp. of China Ltd., Class H(1) | | | 402,000 | | | | 437,928 | | | |
American Oriental Bioengineering, Inc.(1) | | | 21,600 | | | | 85,536 | | | |
Angang Steel Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 214,000 | | | | 395,546 | | | |
Anhui Conch Cement Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 58,000 | | | | 375,280 | | | |
Baidu, Inc. ADR(1) | | | 3,870 | | | | 1,462,550 | | | |
Bank of China, Ltd., Class H | | | 4,177,000 | | | | 2,401,877 | | | |
Bank of Communications, Ltd., Class H | | | 381,000 | | | | 456,036 | | | |
Beijing Capital International Airport Co., Ltd., Class H(1) | | | 310,000 | | | | 208,472 | | | |
Beijing Enterprises Holdings, Ltd. | | | 69,000 | | | | 411,269 | | | |
BOC Hong Kong Holdings, Ltd. | | | 127,500 | | | | 292,846 | | | |
BYD Co., Ltd., Class H(1) | | | 74,200 | | | | 680,261 | | | |
BYD Electronic Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 415,000 | | | | 386,367 | | | |
Chaoda Modern Agriculture Holdings, Ltd. | | | 269,958 | | | | 208,582 | | | |
China Agri-Industries Holdings, Ltd. | | | 453,000 | | | | 433,929 | | | |
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
China (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
China Bluechemical, Ltd., Class H | | | 468,000 | | | $ | 248,403 | | | |
China CITIC Bank, Class H | | | 239,000 | | | | 178,300 | | | |
China Coal Energy Co., Class H | | | 311,000 | | | | 430,340 | | | |
China Communication Services Corp., Ltd., Class H | | | 378,000 | | | | 196,498 | | | |
China Communications Construction Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 481,000 | | | | 517,719 | | | |
China Construction Bank, Class H | | | 2,449,000 | | | | 2,111,360 | | | |
China COSCO Holdings Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 220,975 | | | | 272,076 | | | |
China Dongxiang Group Co. | | | 634,000 | | | | 387,365 | | | |
China Everbright International, Ltd. | | | 171,000 | | | | 78,076 | | | |
China Everbright, Ltd. | | | 100,000 | | | | 236,244 | | | |
China Green (Holdings), Ltd. | | | 72,000 | | | | 63,163 | | | |
China International Marine Containers Co., Ltd., Class B | | | 146,472 | | | | 146,066 | | | |
China Life Insurance Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 545,000 | | | | 2,502,391 | | | |
China Medical Technologies, Inc. ADR | | | 9,700 | | | | 152,290 | | | |
China Mengniu Dairy Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 297,000 | | | | 830,270 | | | |
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 533,650 | | | | 1,365,259 | | | |
China Merchants Holdings International Co., Ltd. | | | 154,000 | | | | 492,127 | | | |
China Mobile, Ltd. | | | 620,000 | | | | 5,812,141 | | | |
China National Building Material Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 122,000 | | | | 262,554 | | | |
China National Materials Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 180,000 | | | | 142,645 | | | |
China Oilfield Services, Ltd., Class H | | | 110,000 | | | | 118,857 | | | |
China Overseas Land & Investment, Ltd. | | | 230,160 | | | | 496,204 | | | |
China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., Class H | | | 1,367,000 | | | | 1,155,874 | | | |
China Pharmaceutical Group, Ltd. | | | 524,000 | | | | 294,162 | | | |
China Railway Construction Corp., Class H | | | 171,000 | | | | 226,231 | | | |
China Railway Group, Ltd., Class H(1) | | | 738,000 | | | | 580,065 | | | |
China Resources Enterprise, Ltd. | | | 202,000 | | | | 677,814 | | | |
China Resources Land, Ltd. | | | 124,000 | | | | 299,018 | | | |
China Resources Power Holdings Co., Ltd. | | | 237,600 | | | | 493,428 | | | |
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 259,500 | | | | 1,162,512 | | | |
China Shipping Container Lines Co., Ltd., Class H(1) | | | 568,000 | | | | 203,274 | | | |
China Shipping Development Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 74,000 | | | | 104,609 | | | |
China Southern Airlines Co., Ltd., Class H(1) | | | 234,000 | | | | 68,360 | | | |
China Taiping Insurance Holdings Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 101,000 | | | | 353,400 | | | |
China Telecom Corp., Ltd., Class H | | | 2,000,000 | | | | 883,954 | | | |
China Travel International Investment Hong Kong, Ltd. | | | 468,000 | | | | 95,535 | | | |
China Unicom, Ltd. | | | 690,372 | | | | 876,077 | | | |
China Vanke Co., Ltd., Class B | | | 445,120 | | | | 550,567 | | | |
China Yurun Food Group, Ltd. | | | 214,000 | | | | 438,737 | | | |
China Zhongwang Holdings, Ltd.(1) | | | 464,000 | | | | 435,578 | | | |
Chongqing Changan Automobile Co., Ltd., Class B | | | 212,136 | | | | 157,722 | | | |
Citic Pacific, Ltd. | | | 205,000 | | | | 527,002 | | | |
CNOOC, Ltd. | | | 1,411,000 | | | | 2,092,066 | | | |
Cnpc Hong Kong, Ltd. | | | 200,000 | | | | 209,105 | | | |
Cosco Pacific, Ltd. | | | 198,000 | | | | 274,011 | | | |
Country Garden Holdings Co. | | | 626,000 | | | | 240,021 | | | |
Ctrip.com International, Ltd. ADR(1) | | | 9,000 | | | | 481,860 | | | |
Datang International Power Generation Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 396,000 | | | | 185,048 | | | |
Dazhong Transportation Group Co., Ltd., Class B | | | 84,750 | | | | 59,014 | | | |
Denway Motors, Ltd. | | | 984,000 | | | | 471,010 | | | |
Dongfeng Motor Corp., Class H | | | 664,000 | | | | 790,289 | | | |
Fibrechem Technologies, Ltd.(1) | | | 100,200 | | | | 0 | | | |
Focus Media Holding, Ltd. ADR(1) | | | 33,500 | | | | 403,340 | | | |
FU JI Food & Catering Services(1) | | | 83,000 | | | | 0 | | | |
Global Bio-chem Technology Group Co., Ltd. | | | 1,000,000 | | | | 244,675 | | | |
Golden Eagle Retail Group, Ltd. | | | 168,000 | | | | 288,947 | | | |
Guangdong Investment, Ltd. | | | 352,000 | | | | 185,749 | | | |
Guangzhou R&F Properties Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 162,400 | | | | 304,310 | | | |
Harbin Power Equipment Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 248,000 | | | | 230,377 | | | |
Hengdeli Holdings, Ltd. | | | 210,000 | | | | 68,377 | | | |
Huaneng Power International, Inc., Class H | | | 512,000 | | | | 326,180 | | | |
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China, Ltd., Class H | | | 3,378,000 | | | | 2,687,587 | | | |
Inner Mongolia Eerduosi Cashmere Products Co., Ltd., Class B | | | 110,000 | | | | 78,042 | | | |
Inner Mongolia Yitai Coal Co., Ltd., Class B | | | 49,800 | | | | 319,282 | | | |
Jiangsu Expressway Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 360,000 | | | | 319,227 | | | |
Jiangxi Copper Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 174,000 | | | | 394,239 | | | |
Kingboard Chemical Holdings, Ltd. | | | 48,500 | | | | 195,208 | | | |
Konka Group Co., Ltd., Class B | | | 303,800 | | | | 118,327 | | | |
Lenovo Group, Ltd. | | | 512,000 | | | | 287,664 | | | |
Li Ning Co., Ltd. | | | 192,500 | | | | 523,490 | | | |
Maanshan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd., Class H(1) | | | 166,000 | | | | 99,930 | | | |
Mindray Medical International, Ltd. ADR | | | 10,300 | | | | 316,519 | | | |
NetEase.com, Inc. ADR(1) | | | 14,300 | | | | 552,266 | | | |
New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc. ADR(1) | | | 7,400 | | | | 516,816 | | | |
Nine Dragons Paper Holdings, Ltd. | | | 181,000 | | | | 257,900 | | | |
Parkson Retail Group, Ltd. | | | 345,000 | | | | 558,542 | | | |
PetroChina Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 1,856,000 | | | | 2,233,287 | | | |
PICC Property & Casualty Co., Ltd., Class H(1) | | | 360,000 | | | | 265,616 | | | |
Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China, Ltd., Class H | | | 82,000 | | | | 718,122 | | | |
Poly (Hong Kong) Investment, Ltd. | | | 93,000 | | | | 106,413 | | | |
Ports Design, Ltd. | | | 39,500 | | | | 106,197 | | | |
Shanda Interactive Entertainment, Ltd. ADR(1) | | | 5,800 | | | | 253,344 | | | |
Shandong Chenming Paper Holdings, Ltd., Class H | | | 79,800 | | | | 55,639 | | | |
Shandong Weigao Group Medical Polymer Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 124,000 | | | | 435,097 | | | |
Shanghai Electric Group Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 640,000 | | | | 300,562 | | | |
Shanghai Friendship Group, Inc. Co., Class B | | | 48,620 | | | | 58,007 | | | |
Shanghai Industrial Holdings, Ltd. | | | 53,000 | | | | 248,980 | | | |
Shanghai Jin Jiang International Hotels Group Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 404,000 | | | | 123,322 | | | |
Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industry Co., Ltd., Class B | | | 224,250 | | | | 186,028 | | | |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
China (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Shimao Property Holdings, Ltd. | | | 49,000 | | | $ | 91,145 | | | |
SINA Corp.(1) | | | 4,500 | | | | 168,255 | | | |
Sino-Ocean Land Holdings, Ltd. | | | 195,000 | | | | 189,391 | | | |
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co., Ltd., Class H(1) | | | 254,000 | | | | 101,799 | | | |
Sinotrans Shipping, Ltd. | | | 512,000 | | | | 229,939 | | | |
Sinotruk Hong Kong, Ltd. | | | 55,500 | | | | 65,992 | | | |
Sohu.com, Inc.(1) | | | 5,300 | | | | 294,680 | | | |
Suntech Power Holdings Co., Ltd. ADR(1) | | | 27,000 | | | | 342,090 | | | |
Tencent Holdings, Ltd. | | | 79,600 | | | | 1,386,041 | | | |
Tingyi (Cayman Islands) Holding Corp. | | | 334,000 | | | | 745,233 | | | |
Tsingtao Brewery Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 76,000 | | | | 308,769 | | | |
Want Want China Holdings, Ltd. | | | 1,231,000 | | | | 723,221 | | | |
Wumart Stores, Inc., Class H | | | 55,000 | | | | 93,409 | | | |
Yangzijiang Shipbuilding Holdings, Ltd. | | | 355,000 | | | | 248,495 | | | |
Yantai Changyu Pioneer Wine Co., Ltd., Class B | | | 50,200 | | | | 369,021 | | | |
Yanzhou Coal Mining Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 260,000 | | | | 401,950 | | | |
Zhejiang Expressway Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 210,000 | | | | 178,879 | | | |
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd., Class H | | | 352,000 | | | | 340,714 | | | |
ZTE Corp., Class H | | | 115,752 | | | | 643,610 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 61,862,127 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Colombia — 0.7% |
|
Almacenes Exito SA | | | 102,500 | | | $ | 796,226 | | | |
Banco de Bogota | | | 3,600 | | | | 57,586 | | | |
Bancolombia SA ADR, PFC Shares | | | 28,700 | | | | 1,135,946 | | | |
Cementos Argos SA | | | 22,360 | | | | 111,772 | | | |
Cia Colombiana de Inversiones SA | | | 21,337 | | | | 517,293 | | | |
Cia de Cemento Argos SA | | | 72,900 | | | | 553,173 | | | |
Corporacion Financiera Colombiana SA | | | 11,604 | | | | 128,772 | | | |
Ecopetrol SA | | | 799,340 | | | | 1,018,904 | | | |
Empresa de Telecommunicaciones de Bogota SA | | | 647,380 | | | | 312,283 | | | |
Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores SA | | | 215,300 | | | | 79,534 | | | |
Grupo de Inversiones Suramericana | | | 43,700 | | | | 491,502 | | | |
Grupo Nacional de Chocolates SA | | | 67,045 | | | | 698,434 | | | |
Interconexion Electrica SA | | | 131,760 | | | | 765,334 | | | |
ISAGEN SA ESP | | | 426,200 | | | | 446,333 | | | |
Proenergia Internacional(1)(2) | | | 4,360 | | | | 0 | | | |
Promigas SA | | | 4,360 | | | | 83,691 | | | |
Textiles Fabricato Tejicondor SA(1) | | | 4,522,600 | | | | 47,475 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,244,258 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Croatia — 0.7% |
|
Adris Grupa DD, PFC Shares | | | 11,430 | | | $ | 604,794 | | | |
Atlantska Plovidba DD | | | 5,167 | | | | 1,042,438 | | | |
Dalekovod DD(1) | | | 4,050 | | | | 320,735 | | | |
Ericsson Nikola Tesla | | | 1,100 | | | | 297,965 | | | |
Hrvatske Telekomunikacije DD | | | 56,585 | | | | 3,066,982 | | | |
INA Industrija Nafte DD(1) | | | 2,037 | | | | 689,878 | | | |
Institut IGH DD | | | 350 | | | | 254,251 | | | |
Koncar-Elektroindustrija DD(1) | | | 3,419 | | | | 315,661 | | | |
Podravka Prehrambena Industija DD(1) | | | 5,675 | | | | 324,156 | | | |
Privredna Banka Zagreb DD(1) | | | 3,177 | | | | 389,374 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,306,234 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Czech Republic — 1.9% |
|
CEZ AS | | | 139,760 | | | $ | 6,882,362 | | | |
Komercni Banka AS | | | 23,364 | | | | 4,581,696 | | | |
New World Resources NV, Class A | | | 226,200 | | | | 2,023,819 | | | |
Philip Morris CR AS | | | 1,613 | | | | 775,452 | | | |
Telefonica 02 Czech Republic AS | | | 98,804 | | | | 2,327,929 | | | |
Unipetrol AS(1) | | | 195,323 | | | | 1,458,252 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 18,049,510 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Egypt — 1.6% |
|
Alexandria Mineral Oils Co. | | | 7,520 | | | $ | 56,781 | | | |
Arab Cotton Ginning | | | 292,800 | | | | 278,316 | | | |
Commercial International Bank | | | 133,902 | | | | 1,386,290 | | | |
Delta Sugar Co.(1) | | | 19,428 | | | | 90,394 | | | |
Eastern Tobacco | | | 16,004 | | | | 364,182 | | | |
Egypt Kuwaiti Holding Co. | | | 274,179 | | | | 649,462 | | | |
Egyptian Financial & Industrial Co. | | | 87,400 | | | | 380,621 | | | |
Egyptian Financial Group-Hermes Holding SAE | | | 133,671 | | | | 778,718 | | | |
Egyptian for Tourism Resorts(1) | | | 377,250 | | | | 155,103 | | | |
Egyptian International Pharmaceutical Industrial Co. | | | 23,900 | | | | 160,790 | | | |
Egyptian Media Production City(1) | | | 292,174 | | | | 309,453 | | | |
El Ezz Aldekhela Steel Alexa Co. | | | 2,400 | | | | 353,883 | | | |
El Ezz Steel Rebars SAE | | | 213,145 | | | | 624,064 | | | |
El Sewedy Cables Holding Co. | | | 35,673 | | | | 475,021 | | | |
El Watany Bank of Egypt | | | 12,400 | | | | 100,052 | | | |
Maridive & Oil Services SAE | | | 119,000 | | | | 518,092 | | | |
Medinet Nasr for Housing | | | 10,375 | | | | 61,079 | | | |
Misr Beni Suef Cement Co. | | | 5,940 | | | | 140,904 | | | |
MobiNil-Egyptian Co. for Mobil Services | | | 14,100 | | | | 542,252 | | | |
National Societe General Bank | | | 38,700 | | | | 197,550 | | | |
Olympic Group Financial Investments | | | 119,400 | | | | 664,923 | | | |
Orascom Construction Industries (OCI) | | | 58,622 | | | | 2,751,360 | | | |
Orascom Telecom Holding SAE | | | 243,990 | | | | 1,627,194 | | | |
Oriental Weavers Co. | | | 31,299 | | | | 189,994 | | | |
Palm Hills Developments SAE(1) | | | 105,000 | | | | 168,813 | | | |
Pioneers Holding | | | 272,000 | | | | 332,980 | | | |
Sidi Kerir Petrochemicals Co. | | | 227,000 | | | | 485,107 | | | |
Six of October Development & Investment Co.(1) | | | 14,000 | | | | 249,196 | | | |
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Egypt (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
South Valley Cement(1) | | | 226,702 | | | $ | 322,747 | | | |
Suez Cement Co. | | | 10,700 | | | | 66,126 | | | |
Talaat Moustafa Group(1) | | | 389,300 | | | | 515,012 | | | |
Telecom Egypt | | | 203,284 | | | | 658,642 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,655,101 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Estonia — 0.8% |
|
AS Baltika(1) | | | 22,505 | | | $ | 24,251 | | | |
AS Merko Ehitus | | | 105,168 | | | | 819,705 | | | |
AS Nordecon International | | | 349,200 | | | | 726,177 | | | |
AS Norma | | | 17,006 | | | | 94,931 | | | |
AS Olympic Entertainment Group(1) | | | 1,319,390 | | | | 1,397,787 | | | |
AS Tallink Group, Ltd.(1) | | | 4,723,752 | | | | 2,615,374 | | | |
AS Tallinna Kaubamaja | | | 208,840 | | | | 1,181,579 | | | |
AS Tallinna Vesi | | | 42,390 | | | | 622,396 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,482,200 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ghana — 0.2% |
|
Aluworks Ghana, Ltd.(1) | | | 457,409 | | | $ | 119,807 | | | |
CAL Bank, Ltd. | | | 1,298,010 | | | | 199,589 | | | |
Cocoa Processing Co., Ltd. | | | 269,722 | | | | 5,656 | | | |
Ghana Commercial Bank, Ltd. | | | 1,453,841 | | | | 914,525 | | | |
HFC Bank Ghana, Ltd. | | | 1,235,326 | | | | 535,315 | | | |
Produce Buying Co., Ltd. | | | 582,428 | | | | 72,615 | | | |
Standard Chartered Bank of Ghana, Ltd. | | | 24,700 | | | | 504,962 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,352,469 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Hungary — 2.1% |
|
EGIS Rt. | | | 6,664 | | | $ | 702,526 | | | |
Fotex Holding SE Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 25,100 | | | | 55,867 | | | |
Magyar Telekom Rt. | | | 1,004,520 | | | | 4,330,646 | | | |
MOL Hungarian Oil & Gas Rt.(1) | | | 59,450 | | | | 4,966,701 | | | |
OTP Bank Rt.(1) | | | 232,000 | | | | 6,523,716 | | | |
Richter Gedeon Rt. | | | 19,810 | | | | 4,125,664 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 20,705,120 | | | |
|
|
|
|
India — 6.0% |
|
ABB, Ltd. | | | 5,400 | | | $ | 87,005 | | | |
ACC, Ltd. | | | 20,570 | | | | 323,580 | | | |
Aditya Birla Nuvo, Ltd. | | | 3,402 | | | | 56,858 | | | |
Areva T&D India, Ltd. | | | 34,500 | | | | 203,095 | | | |
Asian Paints, Ltd. | | | 8,730 | | | | 302,146 | | | |
Axis Bank, Ltd. | | | 28,600 | | | | 542,785 | | | |
Bajaj Auto, Ltd. | | | 13,280 | | | | 389,841 | | | |
Bajaj Hindusthan, Ltd. | | | 40,000 | | | | 163,167 | | | |
Bajaj Holdings & Investment, Ltd. | | | 5,130 | | | | 52,717 | | | |
Bank of Baroda | | | 9,660 | | | | 103,358 | | | |
Bank of India | | | 64,300 | | | | 448,956 | | | |
Bharat Forge, Ltd. | | | 19,650 | | | | 101,639 | | | |
Bharat Heavy Electricals, Ltd. | | | 24,640 | | | | 1,151,421 | | | |
Bharti Airtel, Ltd. | | | 425,860 | | | | 2,629,284 | | | |
Cairn India, Ltd.(1) | | | 79,000 | | | | 435,929 | | | |
Canara Bank, Ltd. | | | 12,400 | | | | 89,964 | | | |
Cipla, Ltd. | | | 95,010 | | | | 565,099 | | | |
Colgate-Palmolive (India), Ltd. | | | 9,000 | | | | 133,260 | | | |
Container Corp. of India, Ltd. | | | 14,760 | | | | 343,763 | | | |
Crompton Greaves, Ltd. | | | 16,800 | | | | 135,102 | | | |
Dabur India, Ltd. | | | 72,200 | | | | 232,173 | | | |
Deccan Chronicle Holdings, Ltd. | | | 27,600 | | | | 79,807 | | | |
Divi’s Laboratories, Ltd. | | | 7,400 | | | | 82,676 | | | |
DLF, Ltd. | | | 31,200 | | | | 241,815 | | | |
Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Ltd. | | | 22,620 | | | | 484,213 | | | |
Educomp Solutions, Ltd. | | | 24,565 | | | | 409,750 | | | |
Essar Oil, Ltd.(1) | | | 102,130 | | | | 283,570 | | | |
Exide Industries, Ltd. | | | 35,200 | | | | 72,640 | | | |
Gail India, Ltd. | | | 105,050 | | | | 765,417 | | | |
GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. | | | 4,480 | | | | 148,065 | | | |
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. | | | 44,960 | | | | 212,102 | | | |
GMR Infrastructure(1) | | | 248,000 | | | | 325,308 | | | |
Grasim Industries, Ltd. | | | 2,830 | | | | 129,680 | | | |
Gujarat Ambuja Cements, Ltd. | | | 44,800 | | | | 84,063 | | | |
Gujarat State Petronet, Ltd.(1) | | | 144,200 | | | | 243,776 | | | |
GVK Power & Infrastructure, Ltd.(1) | | | 180,000 | | | | 167,287 | | | |
HCL Technologies, Ltd. | | | 21,100 | | | | 135,283 | | | |
HDFC Bank, Ltd. | | | 32,624 | | | | 1,113,976 | | | |
Hero Honda Motors, Ltd. | | | 20,500 | | | | 676,769 | | | |
Hindalco Industries, Ltd. | | | 90,810 | | | | 232,708 | | | |
Hindustan Unilever, Ltd. | | | 288,600 | | | | 1,705,695 | | | |
Hindustan Zinc, Ltd. | | | 6,840 | | | | 129,820 | | | |
Housing Development & Infrastructure, Ltd.(1) | | | 29,714 | | | | 196,035 | | | |
Housing Development Finance Corp. | | | 44,700 | | | | 2,486,953 | | | |
ICICI Bank, Ltd. | | | 125,670 | | | | 2,081,089 | | | |
Idea Cellular, Ltd.(1) | | | 273,500 | | | | 297,236 | | | |
IFCI, Ltd. | | | 68,000 | | | | 62,486 | | | |
Indiabulls Financial Services, Ltd. | | | 18,100 | | | | 63,961 | | | |
Indiabulls Real Estate, Ltd.(1) | | | 91,700 | | | | 470,962 | | | |
Indiabulls Securities, Ltd. | | | 94,300 | | | | 90,804 | | | |
Indian Hotels Co., Ltd. | | | 52,680 | | | | 80,728 | | | |
Indian Oil Corp., Ltd. | | | 71,000 | | | | 465,580 | | | |
Infosys Technologies, Ltd. | | | 82,600 | | | | 3,850,764 | | | |
Infosys Technologies, Ltd. ADR | | | 3,800 | | | | 174,800 | | | |
Infrastructure Development Finance Co., Ltd. | | | 76,600 | | | | 236,543 | | | |
ITC, Ltd. | | | 276,530 | | | | 1,495,974 | | | |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
India (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
IVRCL Infrastructures & Projects, Ltd. | | | 95,800 | | | $ | 699,447 | | | |
Jaiprakash Associates, Ltd. | | | 111,200 | | | | 489,233 | | | |
Jindal Steel & Power, Ltd. | | | 77,700 | | | | 1,041,500 | | | |
JSW Steel, Ltd. | | | 7,600 | | | | 120,200 | | | |
Kotak Mahindra Bank, Ltd. | | | 59,100 | | | | 876,920 | | | |
Lanco Infratech, Ltd.(1) | | | 13,900 | | | | 141,658 | | | |
Larsen & Toubro, Ltd. | | | 36,360 | | | | 1,195,456 | | | |
Larsen & Toubro, Ltd. GDR | | | 1,600 | | | | 53,419 | | | |
Lupin, Ltd. | | | 3,900 | | | | 102,163 | | | |
Mahindra & Mahindra, Ltd. | | | 53,480 | | | | 1,028,377 | | | |
Maruti Udyog, Ltd. | | | 25,450 | | | | 746,417 | | | |
Motor Industries Co., Ltd. | | | 1,130 | | | | 101,760 | | | |
Mphasis, Ltd. | | | 14,800 | | | | 210,347 | | | |
Mundra Port & Special Economic Zone, Ltd. | | | 29,400 | | | | 310,966 | | | |
Nestle India, Ltd. | | | 9,530 | | | | 518,629 | | | |
Nicholas Piramal India, Ltd. | | | 32,000 | | | | 254,177 | | | |
NTPC, Ltd. | | | 305,300 | | | | 1,364,441 | | | |
Oil & Natural Gas Corp., Ltd. | | | 70,470 | | | | 1,682,322 | | | |
Power Grid Corp. of India, Ltd. | | | 185,700 | | | | 403,664 | | | |
Punj Lloyd, Ltd. | | | 36,200 | | | | 152,094 | | | |
Ranbaxy Laboratories, Ltd.(1) | | | 28,560 | | | | 233,138 | | | |
Reliance Capital, Ltd. | | | 36,835 | | | | 573,493 | | | |
Reliance Communications, Ltd. | | | 230,960 | | | | 848,155 | | | |
Reliance Industries, Ltd. | | | 126,419 | | | | 5,103,639 | | | |
Reliance Infrastructure, Ltd. | | | 41,400 | | | | 909,836 | | | |
Reliance Natural Resources, Ltd.(1) | | | 207,800 | | | | 277,872 | | | |
Reliance Power, Ltd.(1) | | | 145,300 | | | | 425,528 | | | |
Satyam Computer Services, Ltd. | | | 144,150 | | | | 311,051 | | | |
Sesa Goa, Ltd. | | | 37,000 | | | | 238,583 | | | |
Shree Renuka Sugars, Ltd. | | | 55,000 | | | | 214,225 | | | |
Siemens India, Ltd. | | | 7,380 | | | | 78,914 | | | |
State Bank of India | | | 12,000 | | | | 551,199 | | | |
State Bank of India GDR | | | 9,600 | | | | 876,812 | | | |
Steel Authority of India, Ltd. | | | 155,400 | | | | 537,563 | | | |
Sterlite Industries (India), Ltd. | | | 49,280 | | | | 796,436 | | | |
Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries, Ltd. | | | 22,200 | | | | 651,334 | | | |
Sun TV Network, Ltd. | | | 12,400 | | | | 81,505 | | | |
Suzlon Energy, Ltd.(1) | | | 78,150 | | | | 108,107 | | | |
Tata Communications, Ltd. | | | 31,000 | | | | 251,639 | | | |
Tata Consultancy Services, Ltd. | | | 85,500 | | | | 1,141,963 | | | |
Tata Motors, Ltd. | | | 21,050 | | | | 248,634 | | | |
Tata Power Co., Ltd. | | | 29,990 | | | | 837,650 | | | |
Tata Steel, Ltd. | | | 38,896 | | | | 384,386 | | | |
Tata Tea, Ltd. | | | 11,800 | | | | 214,252 | | | |
Tata Teleservices Maharashtra, Ltd.(1) | | | 365,500 | | | | 202,551 | | | |
Titan Industries, Ltd. | | | 3,300 | | | | 87,389 | | | |
Torrent Power, Ltd. | | | 44,700 | | | | 262,954 | | | |
Unitech, Ltd. | | | 35,100 | | | | 59,518 | | | |
United Spirits, Ltd. | | | 18,500 | | | | 411,787 | | | |
Voltas, Ltd. | | | 39,000 | | | | 131,367 | | | |
Wipro, Ltd. | | | 52,100 | | | | 668,177 | | | |
Zee Entertainment Enterprises, Ltd. | | | 73,557 | | | | 354,612 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 57,836,936 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Indonesia — 3.0% |
|
Adaro Energy PT | | | 6,000,000 | | | $ | 946,599 | | | |
Aneka Tambang Tbk PT | | | 2,434,000 | | | | 565,643 | | | |
Astra Argo Lestari Tbk PT | | | 321,000 | | | | 712,611 | | | |
Astra International Tbk PT | | | 1,254,200 | | | | 4,035,133 | | | |
Bakrie & Brothers Tbk PT(1) | | | 47,245,500 | | | | 479,706 | | | |
Bakrie Sumatera Plantations Tbk PT | | | 556,500 | | | | 39,586 | | | |
Bank Central Asia Tbk PT | | | 4,759,500 | | | | 2,241,256 | | | |
Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk PT | | | 2,004,803 | | | | 935,253 | | | |
Bank Mandiri Tbk PT | | | 3,135,500 | | | | 1,504,585 | | | |
Bank Pan Indonesia Tbk PT(1) | | | 1,456,500 | | | | 116,935 | | | |
Bank Rakyat Indonesia PT | | | 2,407,500 | | | | 1,751,931 | | | |
Barito Pacific Tbk PT(1) | | | 665,800 | | | | 94,842 | | | |
Berlian Laju Tanker Tbk PT | | | 904,000 | | | | 66,057 | | | |
Bumi Resources Tbk PT | | | 11,727,000 | | | | 2,823,128 | | | |
Energi Mega Persada Tbk PT(1) | | | 1,550,700 | | | | 44,842 | | | |
Gudang Garam Tbk PT | | | 179,000 | | | | 263,315 | | | |
Indah Kiat Pulp & Paper Corp. Tbk PT(1) | | | 1,021,000 | | | | 188,928 | | | |
Indocement Tunggal Prakarsa Tbk PT | | | 167,000 | | | | 190,157 | | | |
Indofood Sukses Makmur Tbk PT | | | 2,314,000 | | | | 731,314 | | | |
Indosat Tbk PT | | | 1,134,000 | | | | 602,357 | | | |
International Nickel Indonesia Tbk PT(1) | | | 1,665,500 | | | | 690,199 | | | |
Kalbe Farma Tbk PT | | | 1,745,500 | | | | 218,912 | | | |
Lippo Karawaci Tbk PT(1) | | | 5,149,500 | | | | 348,333 | | | |
Medco Energi Internasional Tbk PT | | | 2,095,000 | | | | 585,519 | | | |
Perusahaan Gas Negara PT | | | 3,904,000 | | | | 1,452,615 | | | |
Perusahaan Perkebunan London Sumatra Indonesia Tbk PT | | | 155,500 | | | | 123,985 | | | |
PT AKR Corporindo Tbk | | | 861,500 | | | | 100,762 | | | |
PT Indo Tambangraya Megah Tbk | | | 221,500 | | | | 516,501 | | | |
Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk PT | | | 301,000 | | | | 212,718 | | | |
Tambang Batubara Bukit Asam Tbk PT | | | 404,500 | | | | 630,161 | | | |
Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk PT | | | 2,855,000 | | | | 2,458,479 | | | |
Unilever Indonesia Tbk PT | | | 711,800 | | | | 744,457 | | | |
United Tractors Tbk PT | | | 1,577,000 | | | | 2,417,932 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 28,834,751 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Israel — 3.1% |
|
Alony Hetz Properties & Investments, Ltd. | | | 18,100 | | | $ | 64,290 | | | |
Alvarion, Ltd.(1) | | | 8,900 | | | | 35,706 | | | |
Avner Oil & Gas, Ltd. | | | 850,000 | | | | 266,867 | | | |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Israel (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Bank Hapoalim B.M.(1) | | | 354,331 | | | $ | 1,293,573 | | | |
Bank Leumi Le-Israel(1) | | | 432,508 | | | | 1,689,153 | | | |
Bezeq Israeli Telecommunication Corp., Ltd. | | | 546,135 | | | | 1,218,821 | | | |
Cellcom Israel, Ltd. | | | 26,200 | | | | 788,358 | | | |
Check Point Software Technologies, Ltd.(1) | | | 55,206 | | | | 1,715,250 | | | |
Clal Industries, Ltd.(1) | | | 14,400 | | | | 73,463 | | | |
Clal Insurance Enterprise Holdings, Ltd.(1) | | | 2,810 | | | | 59,487 | | | |
Delek Group, Ltd. | | | 2,130 | | | | 351,895 | | | |
Discount Investment Corp. | | | 16,400 | | | | 385,361 | | | |
Elbit Systems, Ltd. | | | 9,950 | | | | 602,831 | | | |
Ezchip Semiconductor, Ltd.(1) | | | 6,700 | | | | 80,199 | | | |
Frutarom | | | 8,107 | | | | 65,755 | | | |
Gazit Globe (1982), Ltd. | | | 12,000 | | | | 110,902 | | | |
Gilat Satellite Networks, Ltd.(1) | | | 11,760 | | | | 52,802 | | | |
Harel Insurance Investments & Financial Services, Ltd.(1) | | | 11,680 | | | | 552,873 | | | |
Housing & Construction Holdings, Ltd. | | | 118,000 | | | | 206,684 | | | |
IDB Holding Corp., Ltd. | | | 2,900 | | | | 68,193 | | | |
Israel Chemicals, Ltd. | | | 235,061 | | | | 2,745,614 | | | |
Israel Corp., Ltd.(1) | | | 1,275 | | | | 876,878 | | | |
Israel Discount Bank, Ltd., Series A | | | 346,200 | | | | 660,870 | | | |
Isramco Negev 2, LP(1) | | | 3,686,000 | | | | 379,057 | | | |
Koor Industries, Ltd. | | | 8,510 | | | | 243,996 | | | |
Makhteshim-Agan Industries, Ltd. | | | 104,897 | | | | 490,278 | | | |
Mellanox Technologies, Ltd.(1) | | | 4,200 | | | | 73,853 | | | |
Menorah Mivtachim Holdings, Ltd.(1) | | | 6,900 | | | | 79,109 | | | |
Migdal Insurance & Financial, Ltd. Holdings(1) | | | 38,400 | | | | 60,185 | | | |
Mizrahi Tefahot Bank, Ltd.(1) | | | 61,040 | | | | 496,086 | | | |
Ness Technologies, Inc.(1) | | | 17,200 | | | | 113,348 | | | |
Nice Systems, Ltd.(1) | | | 18,423 | | | | 573,274 | | | |
Oil Refineries, Ltd. | | | 162,600 | | | | 89,304 | | | |
Orbotech, Ltd.(1) | | | 20,000 | | | | 186,000 | | | |
Ormat Industries, Ltd. | | | 27,300 | | | | 237,985 | | | |
Osem Investment, Ltd. | | | 19,544 | | | | 253,535 | | | |
Partner Communications Co., Ltd. | | | 41,300 | | | | 783,083 | | | |
Paz Oil Co., Ltd. | | | 2,100 | | | | 327,093 | | | |
Strauss Group, Ltd. | | | 23,300 | | | | 302,011 | | | |
Supersol, Ltd. | | | 26,000 | | | | 123,043 | | | |
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. ADR | | | 220,704 | | | | 11,141,138 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 29,918,203 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Jordan — 0.8% |
|
Arab Bank PLC | | | 201,285 | | | $ | 3,790,785 | | | |
Arab Potash Co., PLC | | | 23,800 | | | | 1,010,362 | | | |
Bank of Jordan | | | 11,100 | | | | 35,391 | | | |
Capital Bank of Jordan(1) | | | 185,557 | | | | 361,551 | | | |
Jordan Ahli Bank | | | 14,700 | | | | 31,474 | | | |
Jordan Petroleum Refinery | | | 28,400 | | | | 292,298 | | | |
Jordan Phosphate Mines | | | 15,900 | | | | 387,610 | | | |
Jordan Steel | | | 57,402 | | | | 213,781 | | | |
Jordan Telecom Corp. | | | 37,600 | | | | 270,897 | | | |
Jordanian Electric Power Co. | | | 113,889 | | | | 603,112 | | | |
Lafarge Jordan Cement | | | 5,600 | | | | 55,700 | | | |
Middle East Complex for Engineering, Electric, & Heavy Industries PLC(1) | | | 69,800 | | | | 150,469 | | | |
Taameer Jordan Co.(1) | | | 279,605 | | | | 229,122 | | | |
Union Land Development(1) | | | 32,100 | | | | 99,710 | | | |
United Arab Investors(1) | | | 335,925 | | | | 284,582 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,816,844 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Kazakhstan — 0.3% |
|
KazMunaiGas Exploration Production GDR | | | 123,400 | | | $ | 2,910,702 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,910,702 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Kenya — 0.8% |
|
Athi River Mining, Ltd. | | | 78,100 | | | $ | 99,578 | | | |
Bamburi Cement Co., Ltd. | | | 172,700 | | | | 378,929 | | | |
Barclays Bank of Kenya, Ltd. | | | 716,965 | | | | 427,263 | | | |
East African Breweries, Ltd. | | | 884,080 | | | | 1,679,648 | | | |
Equity Bank, Ltd. | | | 5,398,700 | | | | 1,032,289 | | | |
KenolKobil, Ltd. | | | 409,000 | | | | 255,625 | | | |
Kenya Airways, Ltd. | | | 345,800 | | | | 112,079 | | | |
Kenya Commercial Bank, Ltd. | | | 2,795,300 | | | | 731,866 | | | |
Kenya Electricity Generating Co., Ltd. | | | 2,321,100 | | | | 322,535 | | | |
Kenya Power & Lighting, Ltd. | | | 83,900 | | | | 158,368 | | | |
Mumias Sugar Co., Ltd. | | | 856,800 | | | | 78,577 | | | |
Nation Media Group, Ltd. | | | 206,200 | | | | 330,526 | | | |
Safaricom, Ltd. | | | 34,362,672 | | | | 1,840,258 | | | |
Standard Chartered Bank Kenya, Ltd. | | | 62,800 | | | | 121,555 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,569,096 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Kuwait — 0.9% |
|
Aerated Concrete Industries Co. | | | 189,000 | | | $ | 264,382 | | | |
Agility(1) | | | 50,000 | | | | 202,833 | | | |
Al Safwa Group Co.(1) | | | 800,000 | | | | 144,302 | | | |
Boubyan Bank KSC(1) | | | 100,000 | | | | 181,850 | | | |
Boubyan Petrochemicals Co. | | | 220,000 | | | | 319,287 | | | |
Burgan Bank SAK(1) | | | 196,000 | | | | 267,319 | | | |
Burgan Co. For Well Drilling, Trading & Maintenance KSCC | | | 75,250 | | | | 148,205 | | | |
Commercial Bank of Kuwait SAK | | | 50,000 | | | | 173,107 | | | |
Commercial Real Estate Co. KSCC(1) | | | 406,600 | | | | 179,163 | | | |
Global Investment House KSCC(1) | | | 527,500 | | | | 199,231 | | | |
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Kuwait (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Gulf Bank(1) | | | 260,000 | | | $ | 295,506 | | | |
Gulf Cable & Electrical Industries | | | 50,000 | | | | 323,082 | | | |
Kuwait Finance House KSC | | | 247,100 | | | | 1,019,682 | | | |
Kuwait Foods Co. (Americana) | | | 45,000 | | | | 283,266 | | | |
Kuwait International Bank(1) | | | 154,000 | | | | 119,559 | | | |
Kuwait Projects Co. Holdings KSC | | | 45,000 | | | | 76,325 | | | |
Mabanee Co. SAKC(1) | | | 38,500 | | | | 95,594 | | | |
Mobile Telecommunications Co. | | | 387,500 | | | | 1,571,953 | | | |
National Bank of Kuwait SAK | | | 322,750 | | | | 1,354,433 | | | |
National Industries Group Holding(1) | | | 390,000 | | | | 511,453 | | | |
National Investment Co.(1) | | | 120,000 | | | | 182,549 | | | |
National Real Estate Co.(1) | | | 210,000 | | | | 212,457 | | | |
Sultan Center Food Products Co.(1) | | | 220,000 | | | | 187,725 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,313,263 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Latvia — 0.1% |
|
Grindeks(1) | | | 42,000 | | | $ | 393,716 | | | |
Latvian Shipping Co.(1) | | | 735,000 | | | | 686,512 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,080,228 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lebanon — 0.3% |
|
Solidere | | | 83,555 | | | $ | 2,182,457 | | | |
Solidere GDR(3) | | | 28,500 | | | | 748,856 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,931,313 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lithuania — 0.3% |
|
Apranga PVA(1) | | | 278,536 | | | $ | 268,568 | | | |
Invalda PVA(1) | | | 19,100 | | | | 17,298 | | | |
Klaipedos Nafta PVA | | | 1,345,900 | | | | 548,656 | | | |
Lietuvos Dujos | | | 31,900 | | | | 32,257 | | | |
Lietuvos Energija(1) | | | 42,400 | | | | 54,510 | | | |
Pieno Zvaigzdes | | | 63,600 | | | | 81,106 | | | |
Rokiskio Suris(1) | | | 69,800 | | | | 90,506 | | | |
Rytu Skirstomieji Tinklai(1) | | | 88,200 | | | | 80,109 | | | |
Sanitas(1) | | | 55,400 | | | | 223,885 | | | |
Siauliu Bankas(1) | | | 774,861 | | | | 353,963 | | | |
Ukio Bankas Commercial Bank(1) | | | 1,672,935 | | | | 850,198 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,601,056 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Malaysia — 3.1% |
|
Airasia Bhd(1) | | | 915,300 | | | $ | 359,890 | | | |
Alliance Financial Group Bhd | | | 385,700 | | | | 275,587 | | | |
AMMB Holdings Bhd | | | 459,200 | | | | 631,363 | | | |
Astro All Asia Networks PLC | | | 414,000 | | | | 399,290 | | | |
Batu Kawan Bhd | | | 90,500 | | | | 262,441 | | | |
Berjaya Sports Toto Bhd | | | 297,214 | | | | 374,632 | | | |
British American Tobacco Malaysia Bhd | | | 35,500 | | | | 466,214 | | | |
Bursa Malaysia Bhd | | | 131,700 | | | | 311,498 | | | |
CIMB Group Holdings Bhd | | | 363,800 | | | | 1,319,842 | | | |
Dialog Group Bhd | | | 221,900 | | | | 83,712 | | | |
Digi.com Bhd | | | 65,600 | | | | 418,897 | | | |
Gamuda Bhd | | | 1,076,200 | | | | 982,617 | | | |
Genting Bhd | | | 626,600 | | | | 1,317,198 | | | |
Genting Plantations Bhd | | | 163,400 | | | | 292,131 | | | |
Hong Leong Bank Bhd | | | 178,000 | | | | 389,227 | | | |
Hong Leong Financial Group Bhd | | | 145,000 | | | | 262,328 | | | |
IGB Corp. Bhd(1) | | | 173,500 | | | | 98,544 | | | |
IJM Corp. Bhd | | | 645,490 | | | | 900,354 | | | |
IOI Corp. Bhd | | | 925,705 | | | | 1,435,313 | | | |
Kencana Petroleum Bhd | | | 233,700 | | | | 148,042 | | | |
Kinsteel Bhd | | | 202,200 | | | | 54,490 | | | |
KNM Group Bhd | | | 4,983,800 | | | | 1,131,071 | | | |
Kuala Lumpur Kepong Bhd | | | 128,500 | | | | 561,176 | | | |
Kulim (Malaysia) Bhd | | | 141,000 | | | | 303,212 | | | |
Lafarge Malayan Cement Bhd | | | 270,150 | | | | 476,729 | | | |
Lion Industries Corp. Bhd | | | 540,300 | | | | 220,935 | | | |
Malayan Banking Bhd | | | 727,487 | | | | 1,408,920 | | | |
Malaysian Airline System Bhd(1) | | | 165,733 | | | | 150,044 | | | |
Malaysian Airline System Bhd, PFC Shares | | | 33,533 | | | | 7,714 | | | |
Malaysian Bulk Carriers Bhd | | | 102,200 | | | | 92,934 | | | |
Malaysian Resources Corp. Bhd(1) | | | 949,000 | | | | 374,968 | | | |
MISC Bhd | | | 317,000 | | | | 824,009 | | | |
MMC Corp. Bhd | | | 540,000 | | | | 391,351 | | | |
Multi-Purpose Holdings Bhd | | | 121,440 | | | | 65,781 | | | |
Parkson Holdings Bhd | | | 205,040 | | | | 304,213 | | | |
Petra Perdana Bhd | | | 83,400 | | | | 63,281 | | | |
Petronas Dagangan Bhd | | | 259,700 | | | | 675,582 | | | |
Petronas Gas Bhd | | | 135,200 | | | | 386,450 | | | |
PLUS (Projek Lebuhraya Utara Selatan) Expressways Bhd | | | 411,900 | | | | 397,038 | | | |
PPB Group Bhd | | | 117,700 | | | | 519,772 | | | |
Public Bank Bhd | | | 306,720 | | | | 955,468 | | | |
Resorts World Bhd | | | 1,117,800 | | | | 892,847 | | | |
RHB Capital Bhd | | | 62,100 | | | | 97,424 | | | |
SapuraCrest Petroleum Bhd | | | 208,100 | | | | 125,552 | | | |
Sarawak Energy Bhd | | | 152,400 | | | | 115,353 | | | |
Shell Refining Co. Bhd | | | 36,900 | | | | 115,701 | | | |
Sime Darby Bhd | | | 1,254,839 | | | | 3,244,518 | | | |
Sino Hua-An International Bhd(1) | | | 401,500 | | | | 54,737 | | | |
SP Setia Bhd | | | 228,600 | | | | 257,059 | | | |
TA Enterprise Bhd | | | 323,000 | | | | 72,170 | | | |
TA Global Bhd(1) | | | 193,800 | | | | 55,242 | | | |
TA Global Bhd, PFC Shares(1) | | | 193,800 | | | | 0 | | | |
See notes to financial statements12
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Malaysia (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Tanjong PLC | | | 72,100 | | | $ | 319,029 | | | |
Telekom Malaysia Bhd | | | 381,100 | | | | 334,922 | | | |
Tenaga Nasional Bhd | | | 502,100 | | | | 1,230,658 | | | |
Titan Chemicals Corp. Bhd(1) | | | 168,000 | | | | 56,559 | | | |
TM International Bhd(1) | | | 1,004,850 | | | | 855,769 | | | |
Top Glove Corp. Bhd | | | 97,000 | | | | 231,090 | | | |
UEM Land Holdings Bhd(1) | | | 510,500 | | | | 247,275 | | | |
UMW Holdings Bhd | | | 78,000 | | | | 143,653 | | | |
Wah Seong Corp. Bhd | | | 432,125 | | | | 304,552 | | | |
WCT Bhd | | | 351,800 | | | | 267,960 | | | |
WTK Holdings Bhd | | | 154,250 | | | | 51,998 | | | |
YNH Property Bhd(1) | | | 158,059 | | | | 77,772 | | | |
YTL Corp. Bhd | | | 189,006 | | | | 401,930 | | | |
YTL Power International Bhd | | | 615,821 | | | | 386,970 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 30,034,998 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Mauritius — 0.8% |
|
Ireland Blyth, Ltd. | | | 31,600 | | | $ | 62,418 | | | |
Mauritius Commercial Bank | | | 509,000 | | | | 2,448,100 | | | |
Mauritius Development Investment Trust Co., Ltd. | | | 80,700 | | | | 12,005 | | | |
Naiade Resorts, Ltd. | | | 359,100 | | | | 528,263 | | | |
New Mauritius Hotels, Ltd. | | | 525,350 | | | | 2,316,386 | | | |
Rogers & Co., Ltd. | | | 13,200 | | | | 141,283 | | | |
State Bank of Mauritius, Ltd. | | | 425,800 | | | | 1,126,083 | | | |
Sun Resorts, Ltd. | | | 234,775 | | | | 620,892 | | | |
United Basalt Products, Ltd. | | | 36,000 | | | | 84,496 | | | |
United Docks, Ltd.(1) | | | 27,400 | | | | 83,332 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,423,258 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Mexico — 6.2% |
|
Alfa SA de CV, Series A | | | 281,000 | | | $ | 1,436,524 | | | |
America Movil SAB de CV, Series L | | | 5,940,920 | | | | 13,043,815 | | | |
Axtel SA de CV, Series CPO(1) | | | 367,100 | | | | 273,857 | | | |
Banco Compartamos SA de CV | | | 282,800 | | | | 1,159,793 | | | |
Bolsa Mexicana de Valores SA de CV(1) | | | 630,000 | | | | 725,248 | | | |
Carso Global Telecom SA de CV, Series A1(1) | | | 171,400 | | | | 665,933 | | | |
Carso Infraestructura y Construccion SA(1) | | | 358,400 | | | | 200,864 | | | |
Cemex SAB de CV, Series CPO(1) | | | 5,100,658 | | | | 5,311,676 | | | |
Coca-Cola Femsa SA de CV, Series L | | | 30,200 | | | | 164,452 | | | |
Consorcio ARA SA de CV(1) | | | 459,200 | | | | 288,657 | | | |
Corporacion GEO SA de CV, Series B(1) | | | 194,300 | | | | 514,896 | | | |
Corporacion Moctezuma SA de CV | | | 27,500 | | | | 58,421 | | | |
Desarrolladora Homex SA de CV(1) | | | 81,500 | | | | 485,775 | | | |
Embotelladoras Arca SA | | | 100,000 | | | | 250,611 | | | |
Empresas ICA SAB de CV(1) | | | 513,100 | | | | 1,125,002 | | | |
Fomento Economico Mexicano SA de CV, Series UBD | | | 784,900 | | | | 3,328,933 | | | |
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SA de CV, Class B | | | 41,500 | | | | 104,349 | | | |
Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste SAB de CV, Class B | | | 95,500 | | | | 390,571 | | | |
Grupo Bimbo SA de CV, Series A | | | 223,300 | | | | 1,290,544 | | | |
Grupo Carso SA de CV, Series A1 | | | 484,700 | | | | 1,503,612 | | | |
Grupo Elektra SA de CV | | | 24,000 | | | | 979,722 | | | |
Grupo Financiero Banorte SA de CV, Class O | | | 1,469,300 | | | | 4,819,493 | | | |
Grupo Financiero Inbursa SA de CV, Class O | | | 1,027,700 | | | | 2,900,871 | | | |
Grupo Mexico SA de CV, Series B(1) | | | 2,363,326 | | | | 4,653,714 | | | |
Grupo Modelo SA de CV, Series C(1) | | | 260,000 | | | | 1,205,112 | | | |
Grupo Simec SA de CV, Series B(1) | | | 92,000 | | | | 225,197 | | | |
Grupo Televisa SA, Series CPO | | | 535,800 | | | | 2,045,607 | | | |
Impulsora del Desarrollo y el Empleo en America Latina SA de CV, Series B1(1) | | | 919,900 | | | | 905,705 | | | |
Industrias CH SA, Series B(1) | | | 25,700 | | | | 82,606 | | | |
Industrias Penoles SA de CV | | | 67,800 | | | | 1,255,381 | | | |
Kimberly-Clark de Mexico SA de CV | | | 189,500 | | | | 752,044 | | | |
Mexichem SA de CV | | | 597,991 | | | | 971,459 | | | |
Organizacion Soriana SAB de CV, Class B(1) | | | 120,000 | | | | 267,288 | | | |
Promotora y Operadora de Infraestructura SA de CV(1) | | | 77,700 | | | | 141,233 | | | |
Telefonos de Mexico SA de CV, Series L | | | 1,636,000 | | | | 1,385,249 | | | |
Telmex Internacional SAB de CV, Class L | | | 1,602,300 | | | | 1,031,491 | | | |
TV Azteca SA de CV, Series CPO | | | 625,000 | | | | 321,878 | | | |
Urbi Desarrollos Urbanos SA de CV(1) | | | 178,400 | | | | 351,294 | | | |
Wal-Mart de Mexico SAB de CV, Series V | | | 848,100 | | | | 3,018,250 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 59,637,127 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Morocco — 1.5% |
|
Attijariwafa Bank | | | 46,400 | | | $ | 1,587,342 | | | |
Banque Centrale Populaire | | | 25,280 | | | | 877,211 | | | |
Banque Marocaine du Commerce Exterieur (BMCE) | | | 63,600 | | | | 2,013,756 | | | |
Banque Marocaine pour le Commerce et l’Industrie (BMCI) | | | 2,860 | | | | 321,677 | | | |
Centrale Laitiere | | | 85 | | | | 112,463 | | | |
Ciments du Maroc | | | 2,250 | | | | 459,514 | | | |
Compagnie Generale Immobiliere | | | 2,150 | | | | 523,827 | | | |
Cosumar Compagnie Sucriere Marocaine et de Raffinage | | | 1,230 | | | | 241,825 | | | |
Credit Immobilier et Hotelier | | | 1,440 | | | | 68,729 | | | |
Douja Promotion Groupe Addoha SA | | | 56,300 | | | | 831,163 | | | |
Holcim Maroc SA | | | 2,260 | | | | 537,420 | | | |
Lafarge Ciments | | | 3,010 | | | | 572,628 | | | |
Managem(1) | | | 7,755 | | | | 268,160 | | | |
Maroc Telecom | | | 142,500 | | | | 2,619,534 | | | |
ONA SA | | | 10,770 | | | | 1,836,352 | | | |
RISMA(1) | | | 1,900 | | | | 63,693 | | | |
Samir(1) | | | 3,480 | | | | 267,263 | | | |
Societe des Brasseries du Maroc | | | 1,590 | | | | 687,052 | | | |
Societe Nationale d’Investissement | | | 2,375 | | | | 522,604 | | | |
See notes to financial statements13
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Morocco (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
SONASID (Societe Nationale de Siderurgie) | | | 1,320 | | | $ | 358,013 | | | |
Wafa Assurance | | | 1,090 | | | | 272,958 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,043,184 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Nigeria — 0.8% |
|
Access Bank PLC | | | 5,970,288 | | | $ | 252,499 | | | |
Afribank Nigeria PLC(1) | | | 5,727,146 | | | | 96,022 | | | |
African Petroleum PLC | | | 285,989 | | | | 64,121 | | | |
Ashaka Cement PLC | | | 221,861 | | | | 19,313 | | | |
Benue Cement Co. PLC | | | 1,460,000 | | | | 408,184 | | | |
Dangote Sugar Refinery PLC | | | 5,767,032 | | | | 574,993 | | | |
Diamond Bank PLC | | | 5,100,000 | | | | 257,776 | | | |
Ecobank Transnational, Inc. | | | 1,922,518 | | | | 184,968 | | | |
Fidelity Bank/Nigeria | | | 12,200,000 | | | | 181,541 | | | |
First Bank of Nigeria PLC | | | 9,985,105 | | | | 983,019 | | | |
First City Monument Bank PLC(1) | | | 4,500,000 | | | | 182,889 | | | |
Guaranty Trust Bank PLC | | | 6,274,612 | | | | 644,763 | | | |
Guiness Nigeria PLC | | | 442,075 | | | | 398,750 | | | |
Intercontinental Bank PLC(1) | | | 3,062,209 | | | | 56,552 | | | |
Lafarge Cement WAPCO Nigeria PLC | | | 1,228,000 | | | | 251,898 | | | |
Nestle Foods Nigeria PLC | | | 151,000 | | | | 213,615 | | | |
Nigerian Breweries PLC | | | 1,848,611 | | | | 668,043 | | | |
Oando PLC | | | 448,000 | | | | 276,508 | | | |
Oceanic Bank International PLC(1) | | | 4,301,220 | | | | 68,124 | | | |
PlatinumHabib Bank PLC | | | 2,767,885 | | | | 39,987 | | | |
PZ Cussons Nigeria PLC | | | 1,185,000 | | | | 173,558 | | | |
Skye Bank PLC | | | 4,525,000 | | | | 149,451 | | | |
UAC of Nigeria PLC | | | 900,000 | | | | 244,734 | | | |
Union Bank of Nigeria PLC | | | 4,658,654 | | | | 224,751 | | | |
United Bank for Africa PLC | | | 6,181,798 | | | | 487,420 | | | |
Zenith Bank, Ltd. | | | 6,479,912 | | | | 619,628 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,723,107 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oman — 0.8% |
|
Bank Dhofar SAOG | | | 373,466 | | | $ | 586,799 | | | |
Bank Muscat SAOG | | | 567,695 | | | | 1,329,460 | | | |
Bank Sohar(1) | | | 887,000 | | | | 498,351 | | | |
Dhofar International Development & Investment Holding Co. | | | 27,600 | | | | 28,986 | | | |
Galfar Engineering & Contracting SAOG | | | 368,360 | | | | 612,486 | | | |
National Bank of Oman, Ltd. | | | 184,410 | | | | 154,755 | | | |
Oman Cables Industry SAOG | | | 93,600 | | | | 352,231 | | | |
Oman Cement Co., SAOG | | | 205,500 | | | | 392,350 | | | |
Oman Flour Mills Co., Ltd. SAOG | | | 164,100 | | | | 248,782 | | | |
Oman International Bank SAOG | | | 342,950 | | | | 263,400 | | | |
Oman Telecommunications Co. | | | 486,400 | | | | 1,654,808 | | | |
Ominvest | | | 172,199 | | | | 221,076 | | | |
Raysut Cement Co., SAOG | | | 130,245 | | | | 509,575 | | | |
Renaissance Holdings Co. | | | 301,173 | | | | 524,991 | | | |
Shell Oman Marketing Co. | | | 34,398 | | | | 186,777 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,564,827 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pakistan — 0.8% |
|
Adamjee Insurance Co., Ltd. | | | 201,050 | | | $ | 305,770 | | | |
Allied Bank, Ltd. | | | 117,524 | | | | 81,900 | | | |
Azgard Nine, Ltd.(1) | | | 491,400 | | | | 141,940 | | | |
Bank Alfalah, Ltd.(1) | | | 1,295,638 | | | | 208,172 | | | |
D.G. Khan Cement Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 258,360 | | | | 89,373 | | | |
Engro Chemical Pakistan, Ltd. | | | 326,200 | | | | 649,271 | | | |
Fauji Fertilizer Co., Ltd. | | | 292,352 | | | | 367,368 | | | |
Habib Bank, Ltd. | | | 160,000 | | | | 236,930 | | | |
Hub Power Co., Ltd. | | | 1,346,700 | | | | 467,470 | | | |
Indus Motor Co., Ltd. | | | 24,000 | | | | 53,525 | | | |
Jahangir Siddiqui & Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 500,000 | | | | 211,031 | | | |
Kot Addu Power Co., Ltd. | | | 218,000 | | | | 120,240 | | | |
Lucky Cement, Ltd. | | | 326,500 | | | | 256,972 | | | |
Muslim Commercial Bank, Ltd. | | | 489,102 | | | | 1,249,145 | | | |
National Bank of Pakistan | | | 211,694 | | | | 209,410 | | | |
Nishat Mills, Ltd. | | | 937,800 | | | | 676,925 | | | |
Oil & Gas Development Co., Ltd. | | | 524,000 | | | | 649,974 | | | |
Pakistan Oil Fields, Ltd. | | | 124,000 | | | | 321,894 | | | |
Pakistan Petroleum, Ltd. | | | 224,742 | | | | 469,156 | | | |
Pakistan State Oil Co., Ltd. | | | 93,700 | | | | 342,668 | | | |
Pakistan Telecommunication Co., Ltd. | | | 1,706,100 | | | | 383,566 | | | |
SUI Northern Gas Pipelines, Ltd. | | | 211,000 | | | | 67,550 | | | |
United Bank, Ltd. | | | 362,587 | | | | 250,942 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,811,192 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Peru — 1.5% |
|
Alicorp SA | | | 384,800 | | | $ | 284,400 | | | |
Austral Group SA(1) | | | 658,650 | | | | 76,982 | | | |
Cia de Minas Buenaventura SA ADR | | | 77,980 | | | | 2,617,789 | | | |
Cia Minera Atacocha SA, Class B, PFC Shares | | | 39,750 | | | | 20,907 | | | |
Cia Minera Milpo SA(1) | | | 317,997 | | | | 830,793 | | | |
Credicorp, Ltd. | | | 45,770 | | | | 3,156,635 | | | |
Edegel SA | | | 1,180,000 | | | | 608,456 | | | |
Edelnor SA | | | 108,248 | | | | 101,401 | | | |
Empresa Agroindustrial Casa Grande SA(1) | | | 69,120 | | | | 180,582 | | | |
Energia del Sur SA | | | 39,900 | | | | 167,336 | | | |
Ferreyros SA | | | 331,542 | | | | 307,722 | | | |
Grana y Montero SA | | | 210,612 | | | | 208,512 | | | |
Luz del Sur SAA | | | 90,550 | | | | 138,517 | | | |
Minsur SA | | | 162,200 | | | | 401,458 | | | |
See notes to financial statements14
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Peru (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde SA | | | 19,790 | | | $ | 451,212 | | | |
Sociedad Minera el Brocal SA | | | 8,970 | | | | 131,050 | | | |
Southern Copper Corp. | | | 111,180 | | | | 3,502,170 | | | |
Volcan Cia Minera SA, Class B(1) | | | 1,157,519 | | | | 1,364,830 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,550,752 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Philippines — 1.6% |
|
Aboitiz Equity Ventures, Inc. | | | 3,911,000 | | | $ | 675,115 | | | |
Aboitiz Power Corp. | | | 1,765,000 | | | | 274,257 | | | |
Alliance Global Group, Inc.(1) | | | 4,540,000 | | | | 403,577 | | | |
Altlas Consolidated Mining & Development Corp.(1) | | | 500,000 | | | | 91,394 | | | |
Ayala Corp. | | | 134,196 | | | | 812,006 | | | |
Ayala Land, Inc. | | | 3,951,800 | | | | 854,472 | | | |
Banco De Oro | | | 701,020 | | | | 508,840 | | | |
Bank of the Philippine Islands | | | 943,100 | | | | 917,619 | | | |
Benpres Holdings Corp.(1) | | | 4,600,000 | | | | 336,775 | | | |
Filinvest Land, Inc. | | | 3,449,000 | | | | 64,929 | | | |
First Gen Corp.(1) | | | 709,950 | | | | 234,085 | | | |
First Philippine Holdings Corp.(1) | | | 70,100 | | | | 68,621 | | | |
Globe Telecom, Inc. | | | 18,040 | | | | 345,879 | | | |
Holcim Philippines, Inc. | | | 1,492,000 | | | | 150,299 | | | |
International Container Terminal Services, Inc. | | | 388,900 | | | | 164,668 | | | |
JG Summit Holding, Inc. | | | 2,411,900 | | | | 318,790 | | | |
Jollibee Foods Corp. | | | 363,300 | | | | 386,475 | | | |
Manila Electric Co. | | | 300,400 | | | | 1,167,999 | | | |
Manila Water Co. | | | 254,600 | | | | 85,936 | | | |
Megaworld Corp. | | | 2,476,800 | | | | 77,870 | | | |
Megaworld Corp.(4) | | | 619,200 | | | | 19,468 | | | |
Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. | | | 581,600 | | | | 491,979 | | | |
Philex Mining Corp.(1) | | | 4,017,125 | | | | 955,125 | | | |
Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. | | | 45,620 | | | | 2,451,816 | | | |
PNOC Energy Development Corp. | | | 4,051,000 | | | | 349,865 | | | |
Robinsons Land Corp. | | | 411,400 | | | | 104,465 | | | |
San Miguel Corp., Class B | | | 649,500 | | | | 894,501 | | | |
SM Investments Corp. | | | 155,938 | | | | 1,018,426 | | | |
SM Prime Holdings, Inc. | | | 3,202,799 | | | | 664,142 | | | |
Universal Robina Corp. | | | 1,399,600 | | | | 365,017 | | | |
Vista Land & Lifescapes, Inc.(1) | | | 3,675,000 | | | | 150,164 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,404,574 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Poland — 3.0% |
|
Agora SA(1) | | | 79,030 | | | $ | 518,594 | | | |
AmRest Holdings NV(1) | | | 4,410 | | | | 107,338 | | | |
Bank Handlowy w Warszawie SA(1) | | | 14,170 | | | | 310,753 | | | |
Bank Millennium SA(1) | | | 176,600 | | | | 289,844 | | | |
Bank Pekao SA(1) | | | 58,138 | | | | 3,120,511 | | | |
Bank Zachodni WBK SA(1) | | | 10,600 | | | | 565,886 | | | |
Bioton SA(1) | | | 3,980,100 | | | | 313,063 | | | |
BRE Bank SA(1) | | | 6,003 | | | | 556,501 | | | |
Budimex SA | | | 18,100 | | | | 496,787 | | | |
Cersanit SA(1) | | | 87,100 | | | | 426,276 | | | |
Cyfrowy Polsat SA | | | 111,200 | | | | 536,839 | | | |
Debica SA | | | 2,520 | | | | 53,964 | | | |
Dom Development SA | | | 7,570 | | | | 115,187 | | | |
Echo Investment SA(1) | | | 150,000 | | | | 215,121 | | | |
Eurocash SA | | | 63,000 | | | | 307,539 | | | |
Farmacol SA(1) | | | 4,040 | | | | 57,688 | | | |
Getin Holding SA(1) | | | 233,150 | | | | 663,544 | | | |
Globe Trade Centre SA(1) | | | 53,590 | | | | 462,378 | | | |
Grupa Kety SA(1) | | | 9,600 | | | | 348,406 | | | |
Grupa Lotos SA(1) | | | 26,453 | | | | 240,445 | | | |
ING Bank Slaski SA w Katowicach(1) | | | 1,685 | | | | 378,117 | | | |
KGHM Polska Miedz SA | | | 64,080 | | | | 2,156,973 | | | |
LPP SA(1) | | | 275 | | | | 136,062 | | | |
Mondi Swiecie SA(1) | | | 9,600 | | | | 234,439 | | | |
Mostostal-Warszawa SA(1) | | | 3,160 | | | | 72,252 | | | |
Multimedia Polska SA(1) | | | 89,740 | | | | 215,685 | | | |
Netia SA(1) | | | 401,654 | | | | 584,635 | | | |
NG2 SA | | | 3,810 | | | | 53,184 | | | |
Orbis SA(1) | | | 30,000 | | | | 474,295 | | | |
PBG SA(1) | | | 11,720 | | | | 912,886 | | | |
Polimex Mostostal SA | | | 636,500 | | | | 818,440 | | | |
Polish Oil & Gas | | | 558,200 | | | | 679,710 | | | |
Polnord SA(1) | | | 20,350 | | | | 241,656 | | | |
Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen SA(1) | | | 151,000 | | | | 1,571,717 | | | |
Powszechna Kasa Oszczednosci Bank Polski SA | | | 264,710 | | | | 3,136,546 | | | |
Przedsiebiorstwo Eksportu i Importu KOPEX SA(1) | | | 13,800 | | | | 122,786 | | | |
Softbank SA | | | 68,173 | | | | 1,369,739 | | | |
Telekomunikacja Polska SA | | | 767,350 | | | | 4,503,355 | | | |
TVN SA | | | 260,420 | | | | 1,290,525 | | | |
Vistula Group SA(1) | | | 400,000 | | | | 301,202 | | | |
Zaklad Przetworstwa Hutniczego Stalprodukt SA | | | 1,900 | | | | 346,937 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 29,307,805 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Qatar — 1.6% |
|
Aamal Holding | | | 60,200 | | | $ | 525,728 | | | |
Barwa Real Estate Co.(1) | | | 40,993 | | | | 383,063 | | | |
Commercial Bank of Qatar | | | 34,157 | | | | 667,035 | | | |
Doha Bank, Ltd. | | | 33,176 | | | | 424,558 | | | |
First Finance Co. | | | 53,357 | | | | 329,536 | | | |
Gulf International Services QSC | | | 61,750 | | | | 560,619 | | | |
Industries Qatar | | | 89,335 | | | | 2,722,241 | | | |
Masraf Al Rayan | | | 223,300 | | | | 759,237 | | | |
See notes to financial statements15
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Qatar (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Qatar Electricity & Water Co. | | | 37,000 | | | $ | 1,012,144 | | | |
Qatar Fuel | | | 10,020 | | | | 458,210 | | | |
Qatar Gas Transport Co., Ltd. (NAKILAT)(1) | | | 203,330 | | | | 1,351,033 | | | |
Qatar Insurance Co. | | | 18,635 | | | | 329,662 | | | |
Qatar International Islamic Bank | | | 27,943 | | | | 346,564 | | | |
Qatar Islamic Bank | | | 34,387 | | | | 775,102 | | | |
Qatar National Bank | | | 48,092 | | | | 2,010,558 | | | |
Qatar National Cement Co. | | | 10,500 | | | | 235,874 | | | |
Qatar National Navigation | | | 23,896 | | | | 437,736 | | | |
Qatar Shipping Co. | | | 43,836 | | | | 403,618 | | | |
Qatar Telecom QSC | | | 41,902 | | | | 1,852,855 | | | |
Salam International Investment Co., Ltd. | | | 53,000 | | | | 164,507 | | | |
United Development Co. | | | 4,780 | | | | 49,645 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,799,525 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Romania — 0.8% |
|
Antibiotice SA | | | 409,100 | | | $ | 92,221 | | | |
Banca Transilvania | | | 2,691,296 | | | | 1,598,610 | | | |
Biofarm Bucuresti(1) | | | 7,119,988 | | | | 479,804 | | | |
BRD-Group Societe Generale | | | 777,000 | | | | 3,249,673 | | | |
Impact SA(1) | | | 253,290 | | | | 46,914 | | | |
Rompetrol Rafinare SA(1) | | | 12,930,500 | | | | 283,314 | | | |
SNP Petrom SA(1) | | | 15,699,400 | | | | 1,375,514 | | | |
Transelectrica SA | | | 134,000 | | | | 538,246 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,664,296 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Russia — 6.2% |
|
Aeroflot-Russian International Airlines | | | 229,000 | | | $ | 313,405 | | | |
AvtoVAZ(1) | | | 263,394 | | | | 133,071 | | | |
Cherepovets MK Severstal GDR(3) | | | 24,050 | | | | 173,481 | | | |
Comstar United Telesystems GDR | | | 151,550 | | | | 784,120 | | | |
CTC Media, Inc.(1) | | | 91,467 | | | | 1,470,789 | | | |
Evraz Group SA GDR(1)(3) | | | 20,135 | | | | 487,853 | | | |
Federal Grid Co. Unified Energy System JSC(1) | | | 10,725,782 | | | | 113,490 | | | |
Gazprom OAO ADR | | | 53,450 | | | | 1,290,818 | | | |
Holding MRSK OAO(1) | | | 911,500 | | | | 106,499 | | | |
Irkutskenergo(1) | | | 327,400 | | | | 150,139 | | | |
Irkutskenergo OJSC(1)(2) | | | 338,903 | | | | 0 | | | |
JSC Severstal-Avto(1) | | | 9,262 | | | | 142,808 | | | |
KamAZ(1) | | | 127,700 | | | | 305,603 | | | |
LUKOIL ADR | | | 89,800 | | | | 5,209,445 | | | |
Magnitogorsk Iron & Steel Works GDR(1)(3) | | | 32,100 | | | | 303,262 | | | |
Mechel ADR | | | 22,400 | | | | 384,384 | | | |
Mining & Metallurgical Co.(1) | | | 2,680 | | | | 347,987 | | | |
MMC Norilsk Nickel ADR(1) | | | 151,400 | | | | 1,989,231 | | | |
Mobile TeleSystems | | | 604,700 | | | | 4,139,778 | | | |
Mobile TeleSystems ADR | | | 2,200 | | | | 99,660 | | | |
Mosenergo(1) | | | 971,603 | | | | 87,494 | | | |
NovaTek OAO GDR(3) | | | 30,416 | | | | 1,526,926 | | | |
Novolipetsk Steel GDR(1) | | | 21,400 | | | | 560,680 | | | |
Novolipetsk Steel GDR(1)(3) | | | 6,536 | | | | 170,238 | | | |
OAO Gazprom | | | 73,400 | | | | 436,115 | | | |
OAO Gazprom ADR | | | 485,749 | | | | 11,649,250 | | | |
OAO Rosneft Oil Co. GDR | | | 53,820 | | | | 409,238 | | | |
OAO Seventh Continent(1) | | | 16,900 | | | | 143,563 | | | |
OAO TMK GDR | | | 10,700 | | | | 193,670 | | | |
OAO TMK GDR(3) | | | 2,500 | | | | 45,162 | | | |
OGK-3(1) | | | 967,658 | | | | 50,831 | | | |
OGK-4 OJSC(1) | | | 1,090,428 | | | | 55,612 | | | |
Pegas Nonwovens SA | | | 11,200 | | | | 263,098 | | | |
PIK Group GDR(1) | | | 44,400 | | | | 175,090 | | | |
Polyus Gold ADR | | | 5,600 | | | | 150,526 | | | |
RBC Information Systems(1) | | | 54,450 | | | | 87,617 | | | |
Rosneft Oil Co. GDR | | | 166,000 | | | | 1,269,900 | | | |
Rostelecom ADR | | | 30,400 | | | | 1,187,120 | | | |
RusHydro(1) | | | 31,395,041 | | | | 1,089,439 | | | |
Sberbank | | | 4,279,388 | | | | 9,352,102 | | | |
Sberbank, PFC Shares | | | 539,250 | | | | 812,104 | | | |
Sistema JSFC(1) | | | 104,800 | | | | 66,155 | | | |
Sistema JSFC GDR(1) | | | 41,430 | | | | 672,276 | | | |
Surgutneftegaz | | | 163,200 | | | | 142,156 | | | |
Surgutneftegaz ADR | | | 332,960 | | | | 2,938,969 | | | |
Surgutneftegaz, PFC Shares | | | 914,700 | | | | 381,151 | | | |
Tatneft | | | 26,233 | | | | 109,137 | | | |
Tatneft GDR | | | 61,566 | | | | 1,594,367 | | | |
TGK-2(1) | | | 13,779,634 | | | | 3,114 | | | |
TGK-4(1) | | | 16,839,141 | | | | 5,490 | | | |
Transneft | | | 470 | | | | 393,982 | | | |
Uralsvyazinform | | | 2,952,700 | | | | 69,388 | | | |
Vimpel-Communications ADR | | | 150,740 | | | | 2,702,768 | | | |
VTB Bank OJSC GDR(3) | | | 429,970 | | | | 1,711,404 | | | |
Wimm-Bill-Dann Foods OJSC ADR(1) | | | 2,665 | | | | 180,101 | | | |
X5 Retail Group NV GDR(1) | | | 62,194 | | | | 1,485,530 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 60,117,586 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Slovenia — 0.8% |
|
Gorenje DD(1) | | | 8,720 | | | $ | 167,037 | | | |
Istrabenz(1) | | | 3,000 | | | | 31,980 | | | |
KRKA DD | | | 27,995 | | | | 2,953,952 | | | |
Luka Koper(1) | | | 15,750 | | | | 633,064 | | | |
Mercator Poslovni Sistem | | | 2,532 | | | | 633,974 | | | |
Nova Kreditna Banka Maribor | | | 43,500 | | | | 839,629 | | | |
Petrol | | | 880 | | | | 432,452 | | | |
See notes to financial statements16
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Slovenia (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Sava DD | | | 940 | | | $ | 276,405 | | | |
Telekom Slovenije DD | | | 3,270 | | | | 717,615 | | | |
Zavarovalnica Triglav DD | | | 18,800 | | | | 741,773 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,427,881 | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Africa — 6.1% |
|
ABSA Group, Ltd. | | | 55,150 | | | $ | 873,021 | | | |
Adcock Ingram Holdings, Ltd. | | | 33,300 | | | | 226,520 | | | |
Adcorp Holdings, Ltd. | | | 16,900 | | | | 57,829 | | | |
AECI, Ltd. | | | 6,330 | | | | 49,036 | | | |
African Bank Investments, Ltd. | | | 140,814 | | | | 549,794 | | | |
African Rainbow Minerals, Ltd. | | | 19,600 | | | | 379,487 | | | |
Allan Gray Property Trust | | | 84,300 | | | | 68,534 | | | |
Allied Electronics Corp., Ltd. | | | 17,182 | | | | 64,204 | | | |
Allied Electronics Corp., Ltd., PFC Shares | | | 69,600 | | | | 240,052 | | | |
Anglo Platinum, Ltd.(1) | | | 10,280 | | | | 888,571 | | | |
AngloGold Ashanti, Ltd. | | | 70,471 | | | | 2,632,034 | | | |
Aquarius Platinum, Ltd.(1) | | | 41,700 | | | | 177,824 | | | |
Aspen Pharmacare Holdings, Ltd.(1) | | | 91,031 | | | | 767,196 | | | |
Aveng, Ltd. | | | 238,790 | | | | 1,266,413 | | | |
AVI, Ltd. | | | 119,300 | | | | 316,975 | | | |
Barloworld, Ltd. | | | 122,520 | | | | 763,900 | | | |
Bidvest Group, Ltd. | | | 162,296 | | | | 2,541,384 | | | |
Clicks Group, Ltd. | | | 89,300 | | | | 282,488 | | | |
DataTec, Ltd. | | | 140,700 | | | | 518,216 | | | |
Discovery Holdings, Ltd. | | | 101,945 | | | | 405,125 | | | |
ElementOne, Ltd.(1) | | | 44,850 | | | | 77,478 | | | |
FirstRand, Ltd. | | | 664,950 | | | | 1,497,726 | | | |
Foschini, Ltd. | | | 68,500 | | | | 542,114 | | | |
Gold Fields, Ltd. | | | 132,135 | | | | 1,690,538 | | | |
Grindrod, Ltd. | | | 165,300 | | | | 379,919 | | | |
Group Five, Ltd. | | | 81,460 | | | | 416,818 | | | |
Growthpoint Properties, Ltd. | | | 217,000 | | | | 384,041 | | | |
Harmony Gold Mining Co., Ltd. | | | 71,910 | | | | 720,264 | | | |
Hyprop Investments, Ltd. | | | 67,500 | | | | 391,739 | | | |
Illovo Sugar, Ltd. | | | 27,600 | | | | 125,098 | | | |
Impala Platinum Holdings, Ltd. | | | 98,730 | | | | 2,172,404 | | | |
Imperial Holdings, Ltd. | | | 62,680 | | | | 645,301 | | | |
Investec, Ltd. | | | 72,500 | | | | 535,015 | | | |
JD Group, Ltd. | | | 58,290 | | | | 324,834 | | | |
JSE, Ltd. | | | 15,200 | | | | 117,197 | | | |
Kumba Iron Ore, Ltd. | | | 14,960 | | | | 446,662 | | | |
Kumba Resources, Ltd. | | | 38,610 | | | | 433,687 | | | |
Lewis Group, Ltd. | | | 32,500 | | | | 227,574 | | | |
Liberty Holdings, Ltd. | | | 44,700 | | | | 386,474 | | | |
Massmart Holdings, Ltd. | | | 57,700 | | | | 666,615 | | | |
Medi-Clinic Corp., Ltd. | | | 52,200 | | | | 160,321 | | | |
Metropolitan Holdings, Ltd. | | | 162,100 | | | | 274,459 | | | |
Mittal Steel South Africa, Ltd. | | | 29,277 | | | | 393,992 | | | |
Mondi, Ltd. | | | 9,900 | | | | 55,861 | | | |
Mr. Price Group, Ltd. | | | 72,100 | | | | 329,877 | | | |
MTN Group, Ltd. | | | 645,340 | | | | 9,608,619 | | | |
Murray & Roberts Holdings, Ltd. | | | 160,250 | | | | 1,143,836 | | | |
Mvelaphanda Group, Ltd.(1) | | | 65,900 | | | | 59,705 | | | |
Nampak, Ltd. | | | 171,938 | | | | 372,959 | | | |
Naspers, Ltd., Class N | | | 83,492 | | | | 3,013,933 | | | |
Nedbank Group, Ltd. | | | 46,830 | | | | 703,954 | | | |
Netcare, Ltd.(1) | | | 280,550 | | | | 413,178 | | | |
Northam Platinum, Ltd. | | | 14,400 | | | | 67,294 | | | |
Pangbourne Properties, Ltd. | | | 28,800 | | | | 60,098 | | | |
Pick’n Pay Holdings, Ltd. | | | 36,500 | | | | 82,838 | | | |
Pick’n Pay Stores, Ltd. | | | 45,170 | | | | 234,811 | | | |
Pretoria Portland Cement Co., Ltd. | | | 102,827 | | | | 430,454 | | | |
Raubex Group, Ltd. | | | 93,000 | | | | 291,210 | | | |
Redefine Income Fund, Ltd. | | | 475,000 | | | | 436,597 | | | |
Remgro, Ltd. | | | 74,100 | | | | 867,447 | | | |
Reunert, Ltd. | | | 111,160 | | | | 782,985 | | | |
RMB Holdings, Ltd. | | | 174,300 | | | | 636,339 | | | |
Sanlam, Ltd. | | | 344,190 | | | | 944,976 | | | |
Santam, Ltd. | | | 5,583 | | | | 71,900 | | | |
Sappi, Ltd. | | | 75,636 | | | | 279,494 | | | |
Sasol, Ltd. | | | 90,950 | | | | 3,407,468 | | | |
Shoprite Holdings, Ltd. | | | 80,000 | | | | 651,914 | | | |
Spar Group, Ltd. | | | 54,600 | | | | 481,506 | | | |
Standard Bank Group, Ltd. | | | 238,121 | | | | 2,971,984 | | | |
Steinhoff International Holdings, Ltd. | | | 352,040 | | | | 850,729 | | | |
Sun International, Ltd.(1) | | | 11,182 | | | | 129,865 | | | |
Telkom South Africa, Ltd. | | | 115,950 | | | | 649,643 | | | |
Tiger Brands, Ltd. | | | 40,100 | | | | 802,941 | | | |
Truworths International, Ltd. | | | 92,400 | | | | 528,865 | | | |
Vodacom Group (Pty), Ltd.(1) | | | 111,000 | | | | 769,658 | | | |
Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon, Ltd. | | | 28,100 | | | | 406,869 | | | |
Woolworths Holdings, Ltd. | | | 160,409 | | | | 358,148 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 58,976,828 | | | |
|
|
|
|
South Korea — 6.0% |
|
Amorepacific Corp. | | | 418 | | | $ | 288,861 | | | |
Busan Bank | | | 15,470 | | | | 175,415 | | | |
Cheil Industries, Inc. | | | 11,000 | | | | 410,385 | | | |
CJ CheilJedang Corp. | | | 596 | | | | 100,788 | | | |
CJ O Shopping Co., Ltd. | | | 1,580 | | | | 104,364 | | | |
Daegu Bank | | | 7,550 | | | | 100,173 | | | |
Daelim Industrial Co., Ltd. | | | 1,670 | | | | 105,981 | | | |
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd. | | | 12,241 | | | | 124,705 | | | |
See notes to financial statements17
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
South Korea (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Daewoo International Corp. | | | 3,471 | | | $ | 94,806 | | | |
Daewoo Motor Sales Corp.(1) | | | 23,045 | | | | 191,263 | | | |
Daewoo Securities Co., Ltd. | | | 9,010 | | | | 136,899 | | | |
Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. | | | 18,880 | | | | 248,336 | | | |
Dong-A Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | | | 3,320 | | | | 322,845 | | | |
Dongbu Insurance Co., Ltd. | | | 1,640 | | | | 49,763 | | | |
Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. | | | 12,930 | | | | 274,589 | | | |
Doosan Corp. | | | 3,160 | | | | 219,138 | | | |
Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd. | | | 2,570 | | | | 137,919 | | | |
GLOVIS Co., Ltd. | | | 1,680 | | | | 146,503 | | | |
GS Engineering & Construction Corp. | | | 3,290 | | | | 288,507 | | | |
GS Holdings Corp. | | | 11,000 | | | | 272,473 | | | |
Hana Financial Group, Inc. | | | 34,930 | | | | 1,035,940 | | | |
Hanarotelecom, Inc.(1) | | | 28,346 | | | | 116,533 | | | |
Hanjin Heavy Industries & Construction Co., Ltd. | | | 9,813 | | | | 175,339 | | | |
Hanjin Shipping Co., Ltd. | | | 19,170 | | | | 260,537 | | | |
Hankook Tire Co., Ltd. | | | 21,040 | | | | 402,167 | | | |
Hanmi Pharm Co., Ltd. | | | 2,150 | | | | 207,916 | | | |
Hanwha Chemical Corp. | | | 18,100 | | | | 168,288 | | | |
Hanwha Corp. | | | 9,490 | | | | 303,253 | | | |
Hite Brewery Co., Ltd. | | | 1,789 | | | | 243,425 | | | |
Honam Petrochemical Corp. | | | 1,770 | | | | 121,405 | | | |
Hynix Semiconductor, Inc.(1) | | | 57,940 | | | | 860,208 | | | |
Hyosung Corp. | | | 4,500 | | | | 247,326 | | | |
Hyundai Department Store Co., Ltd. | | | 6,215 | | | | 594,062 | | | |
Hyundai Development Co. | | | 7,860 | | | | 232,627 | | | |
Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd. | | | 11,670 | | | | 644,287 | | | |
Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. | | | 6,105 | | | | 836,221 | | | |
Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. | | | 13,800 | | | | 254,885 | | | |
Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd. | | | 20,100 | | | | 412,051 | | | |
Hyundai Mipo Dockyard Co., Ltd. | | | 775 | | | | 63,848 | | | |
Hyundai Mobis | | | 9,400 | | | | 1,253,426 | | | |
Hyundai Motor Co. | | | 20,300 | | | | 1,841,300 | | | |
Hyundai Securities Co., Ltd. | | | 25,370 | | | | 288,043 | | | |
Hyundai Steel Co. | | | 8,400 | | | | 533,619 | | | |
Industrial Bank of Korea(1) | | | 35,580 | | | | 431,040 | | | |
Kangwon Land, Inc. | | | 23,740 | | | | 317,206 | | | |
KB Financial Group, Inc.(1) | | | 41,611 | | | | 2,001,484 | | | |
KB Financial Group, Inc. ADR(1) | | | 7,759 | | | | 368,087 | | | |
KCC Corp. | | | 1,445 | | | | 416,558 | | | |
Kia Motors Corp.(1) | | | 34,490 | | | | 512,298 | | | |
Komipharm International Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 1,200 | | | | 63,161 | | | |
Korea Electric Power Corp.(1) | | | 50,820 | | | | 1,440,037 | | | |
Korea Exchange Bank | | | 42,760 | | | | 485,928 | | | |
Korea Express Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 4,349 | | | | 238,789 | | | |
Korea Gas Corp. | | | 5,680 | | | | 239,662 | | | |
Korea Investment Holdings Co., Ltd. | | | 6,490 | | | | 173,085 | | | |
Korea Line Corp. | | | 4,000 | | | | 162,541 | | | |
Korea Zinc Co., Ltd. | | | 4,440 | | | | 686,229 | | | |
Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 11,002 | | | | 418,680 | | | |
Korean Reinsurance Co. | | | 37,903 | | | | 342,461 | | | |
KT Corp. | | | 29,473 | | | | 960,738 | | | |
KT Corp. ADR | | | 7,675 | | | | 123,184 | | | |
KT&G Corp. | | | 14,095 | | | | 820,860 | | | |
LG Chem, Ltd. | | | 6,598 | | | | 1,137,036 | | | |
LG Corp. | | | 7,220 | | | | 409,036 | | | |
LG Dacom Corp. | | | 4,150 | | | | 65,538 | | | |
LG Display Co., Ltd. | | | 13,010 | | | | 311,323 | | | |
LG Electronics, Inc. | | | 11,300 | | | | 1,050,453 | | | |
LG Hausys, Ltd.(1) | | | 658 | | | | 65,782 | | | |
LG Household & Health Care, Ltd. | | | 1,850 | | | | 384,230 | | | |
LG Life Sciences, Ltd.(1) | | | 5,000 | | | | 289,471 | | | |
LG Telecom, Ltd. | | | 36,265 | | | | 271,706 | | | |
LIG Insurance Co., Ltd. | | | 12,400 | | | | 254,032 | | | |
Lotte Shopping Co., Ltd. | | | 3,265 | | | | 922,137 | | | |
LS Corp. | | | 3,530 | | | | 288,402 | | | |
Macquarie Korea Infrastructure Fund | | | 31,415 | | | | 132,264 | | | |
Mirae Asset Securities Co., Ltd. | | | 4,880 | | | | 255,083 | | | |
Namhae Chemical Corp. | | | 15,250 | | | | 188,626 | | | |
NCsoft Corp. | | | 1,350 | | | | 144,376 | | | |
NHN Corp.(1) | | | 4,875 | | | | 719,013 | | | |
Nong Shim Co., Ltd. | | | 1,400 | | | | 284,204 | | | |
OCI Co., Ltd. | | | 2,370 | | | | 416,369 | | | |
POSCO | | | 11,317 | | | | 4,690,077 | | | |
S-Oil Corp. | | | 5,785 | | | | 279,853 | | | |
S1 Corp. | | | 5,750 | | | | 230,158 | | | |
Samsung Card Co., Ltd. | | | 14,060 | | | | 557,054 | | | |
Samsung Corp. | | | 10,590 | | | | 431,021 | | | |
Samsung Digital Imaging Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 4,494 | | | | 181,512 | | | |
Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. | | | 7,100 | | | | 590,329 | | | |
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | | | 12,851 | | | | 7,732,870 | | | |
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., PFC Shares | | | 1,928 | | | | 772,339 | | | |
Samsung Engineering Co., Ltd. | | | 4,600 | | | | 406,699 | | | |
Samsung Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd. | | | 8,450 | | | | 334,841 | | | |
Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. | | | 5,885 | | | | 1,071,505 | | | |
Samsung Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. | | | 22,310 | | | | 422,043 | | | |
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. | | | 4,500 | | | | 513,732 | | | |
Samsung Securities Co., Ltd. | | | 6,340 | | | | 310,763 | | | |
Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd. | | | 5,295 | | | | 405,448 | | | |
Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 58,523 | | | | 2,220,418 | | | |
Shinsegae Co., Ltd. | | | 1,422 | | | | 613,932 | | | |
SK Chemicals Co., Ltd. | | | 2,160 | | | | 117,752 | | | |
SK Energy Co., Ltd. | | | 9,599 | | | | 881,653 | | | |
SK Holdings Co., Ltd. | | | 3,665 | | | | 290,737 | | | |
SK Telecom Co., Ltd. | | | 8,200 | | | | 1,248,848 | | | |
SK Telecom Co., Ltd. ADR | | | 9,450 | | | | 157,910 | | | |
See notes to financial statements18
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
South Korea (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
STX Pan Ocean Co., Ltd. | | | 9,800 | | | $ | 91,320 | | | |
Tong Yang Securities, Inc. | | | 5,665 | | | | 51,903 | | | |
Woongjin Coway Co., Ltd. | | | 3,650 | | | | 122,014 | | | |
Woori Finance Holdings Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 13,960 | | | | 187,903 | | | |
Woori Investment & Securities Co., Ltd. | | | 17,000 | | | | 213,708 | | | |
Yuhan Corp. | | | 1,786 | | | | 288,540 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 58,098,410 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Taiwan — 6.2% |
|
Acer, Inc. | | | 280,626 | | | $ | 661,474 | | | |
Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc. | | | 434,677 | | | | 342,587 | | | |
Altek Corp. | | | 94,560 | | | | 160,200 | | | |
Ambassador Hotel | | | 58,000 | | | | 58,803 | | | |
AmTRAN Technology Co., Ltd. | | | 72,630 | | | | 69,028 | | | |
Asia Cement Corp. | | | 428,005 | | | | 449,396 | | | |
Asia Optical Co., Inc. | | | 146,907 | | | | 237,088 | | | |
Asustek Computer, Inc. | | | 434,193 | | | | 797,463 | | | |
AU Optronics Corp. | | | 971,837 | | | | 861,779 | | | |
BES Engineering Corp. | | | 297,000 | | | | 82,338 | | | |
Capital Securities Corp.(1) | | | 143,055 | | | | 66,329 | | | |
Catcher Technology Co., Ltd. | | | 97,647 | | | | 236,382 | | | |
Cathay Financial Holding Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 1,120,765 | | | | 1,921,961 | | | |
Chang Hwa Commercial Bank | | | 950,000 | | | | 413,342 | | | |
Cheng Shin Rubber Industry Co., Ltd. | | | 293,491 | | | | 603,087 | | | |
Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.(1) | | | 840,427 | | | | 419,276 | | | |
Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd. | | | 40,419 | | | | 88,391 | | | |
China Airlines, Ltd.(1) | | | 774,411 | | | | 240,711 | | | |
China Development Financial Holding Corp.(1) | | | 1,982,376 | | | | 516,412 | | | |
China Life Insurance Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 96,300 | | | | 69,937 | | | |
China Motor Corp.(1) | | | 186,315 | | | | 127,801 | | | |
China Petrochemical Development Corp.(1) | | | 820,800 | | | | 293,711 | | | |
China Steel Corp. | | | 1,822,121 | | | | 1,617,753 | | | |
Chinatrust Financial Holding Co., Ltd. | | | 1,345,421 | | | | 808,158 | | | |
Chinese Maritime Transport, Ltd. | | | 26,000 | | | | 68,321 | | | |
Chong Hong Construction Co., Ltd. | | | 34,270 | | | | 62,365 | | | |
Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd.(1) | | | 1,620,000 | | | | 166,191 | | | |
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. | | | 998,177 | | | | 1,752,066 | | | |
Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. ADR | | | 28,347 | | | | 492,671 | | | |
Clevo Co.(1) | | | 47,426 | | | | 59,188 | | | |
Compal Electronics, Inc. | | | 474,066 | | | | 592,679 | | | |
Coretronic Corp. | | | 62,505 | | | | 68,437 | | | |
Delta Electronics, Inc. | | | 246,105 | | | | 683,367 | | | |
Dynapack International Technology Corp. | | | 25,374 | | | | 77,522 | | | |
E.Sun Financial Holding Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 807,478 | | | | 314,318 | | | |
Elan Microelectronics Corp. | | | 165,300 | | | | 223,816 | | | |
Epistar Corp. | | | 103,472 | | | | 301,311 | | | |
EVA Airways Corp.(1) | | | 742,744 | | | | 278,605 | | | |
Evergreen International Storage & Transport Corp.(1) | | | 319,000 | | | | 258,174 | | | |
Evergreen Marine Corp.(1) | | | 582,050 | | | | 293,975 | | | |
Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd. | | | 97,642 | | | | 266,920 | | | |
Far Eastern Department Stores, Ltd. | | | 597,915 | | | | 614,239 | | | |
Far Eastern New Century Corp. | | | 386,556 | | | | 455,833 | | | |
Far EasTone Telecommunications Co., Ltd. | | | 401,074 | | | | 451,249 | | | |
Faraday Technology Corp. | | | 29,434 | | | | 45,745 | | | |
Farglory Land Development Co., Ltd. | | | 20,252 | | | | 40,688 | | | |
Federal Corp.(1) | | | 77,625 | | | | 58,114 | | | |
Feng Hsin Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. | | | 183,260 | | | | 277,075 | | | |
First Financial Holding Co., Ltd. | | | 862,645 | | | | 498,342 | | | |
First Steamship Co., Ltd. | | | 171,771 | | | | 217,107 | | | |
Formosa Chemicals & Fibre Corp. | | | 733,980 | | | | 1,367,784 | | | |
Formosa International Hotels Corp. | | | 8,470 | | | | 105,681 | | | |
Formosa Petrochemical Corp. | | | 375,320 | | | | 915,242 | | | |
Formosa Plastics Corp. | | | 936,670 | | | | 1,796,614 | | | |
Formosa Taffeta Co., Ltd. | | | 169,000 | | | | 114,568 | | | |
Formosan Rubber Group, Inc. | | | 108,000 | | | | 80,604 | | | |
Foxconn International Holdings, Ltd.(1) | | | 255,000 | | | | 223,961 | | | |
Foxconn Technology Co., Ltd. | | | 81,259 | | | | 270,700 | | | |
Fubon Financial Holding Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 1,124,000 | | | | 1,247,225 | | | |
Giant Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | | | 144,120 | | | | 373,723 | | | |
Goldsun Development & Construction Co., Ltd. | | | 151,011 | | | | 68,316 | | | |
Great Wall Enterprise Co., Ltd. | | | 91,448 | | | | 94,687 | | | |
Greatek Electronics, Inc. | | | 52,915 | | | | 50,145 | | | |
HannStar Display Corp.(1) | | | 938,299 | | | | 176,915 | | | |
Highwealth Construction Corp. | | | 63,705 | | | | 79,120 | | | |
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. | | | 771,959 | | | | 3,023,631 | | | |
Hotai Motor Co., Ltd. | | | 61,000 | | | | 141,708 | | | |
HTC Corp. | | | 77,364 | | | | 768,266 | | | |
Hua Nan Financial Holdings Co., Ltd. | | | 772,912 | | | | 449,077 | | | |
Innolux Display Corp. | | | 271,920 | | | | 358,149 | | | |
Inotera Memories, Inc.(1) | | | 379,000 | | | | 223,927 | | | |
Inventec Appliances Corp. | | | 82,120 | | | | 79,380 | | | |
Inventec Co., Ltd. | | | 585,200 | | | | 323,729 | | | |
KGI Securities Co., Ltd. | | | 629,000 | | | | 288,191 | | | |
Largan Precision Co., Ltd. | | | 13,795 | | | | 157,992 | | | |
Lien Hwa Industrial Corp. | | | 113,019 | | | | 51,751 | | | |
Lite-On Technology Corp. | | | 346,596 | | | | 456,488 | | | |
Macronix International Co., Ltd. | | | 667,860 | | | | 338,535 | | | |
Masterlink Securities Corp.(1) | | | 110,000 | | | | 42,765 | | | |
MediaTek, Inc. | | | 117,196 | | | | 1,640,273 | | | |
Mega Financial Holding Co., Ltd. | | | 1,311,000 | | | | 730,067 | | | |
Merida Industry Co., Ltd. | | | 37,950 | | | | 61,132 | | | |
Motech Industries, Inc. | | | 74,431 | | | | 197,045 | | | |
Nan Kang Rubber Tire Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 120,900 | | | | 120,373 | | | |
Nan Ya Plastics Corp. | | | 1,031,608 | | | | 1,641,059 | | | |
Novatek Microelectronics Corp., Ltd. | | | 108,942 | | | | 245,781 | | | |
See notes to financial statements19
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Taiwan (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Oriental Union Chemical Corp. | | | 331,300 | | | $ | 227,743 | | | |
Pan-International Industrial Co., Ltd. | | | 148,484 | | | | 216,364 | | | |
Phison Electronics Corp. | | | 14,305 | | | | 95,755 | | | |
Polaris Securities Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 470,300 | | | | 241,324 | | | |
Pou Chen Corp. | | | 630,705 | | | | 432,425 | | | |
Powerchip Semiconductor Corp.(1) | | | 977,805 | | | | 109,035 | | | |
Powertech Technology, Inc. | | | 118,969 | | | | 325,668 | | | |
President Chain Store Corp. | | | 197,664 | | | | 447,231 | | | |
Qisda Corp.(1) | | | 330,000 | | | | 183,039 | | | |
Quanta Computer, Inc. | | | 315,508 | | | | 596,835 | | | |
Radiant Opto-Electronics Corp. | | | 73,202 | | | | 81,448 | | | |
Realtek Semiconductor Corp. | | | 115,670 | | | | 245,887 | | | |
RichTek Technology Corp. | | | 34,741 | | | | 266,545 | | | |
Ritek Corp.(1) | | | 252,000 | | | | 60,045 | | | |
Ruentex Development Co., Ltd. | | | 71,000 | | | | 79,621 | | | |
Ruentex Industries, Ltd.(1) | | | 276,000 | | | | 450,491 | | | |
Sanyang Industrial Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 742,327 | | | | 297,592 | | | |
Shih Wei Navigation Co., Ltd. | | | 39,923 | | | | 54,656 | | | |
Shin Kong Financial Holding Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 906,589 | | | | 368,853 | | | |
Shin Zu Shing Co., Ltd. | | | 20,450 | | | | 93,462 | | | |
Shinkong Synthetic Fibers Corp. | | | 197,000 | | | | 48,628 | | | |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co. | | | 355,243 | | | | 467,052 | | | |
Simplo Technology Co., Ltd. | | | 58,520 | | | | 300,498 | | | |
Sincere Navigation | | | 65,800 | | | | 73,146 | | | |
Sino-American Silicon Products, Inc. | | | 98,196 | | | | 212,557 | | | |
SinoPac Financial Holdings Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 1,418,000 | | | | 523,687 | | | |
Solar Applied Materials Technology Corp. | | | 108,794 | | | | 226,771 | | | |
Star Up Netcom Co., Ltd.(1)(2) | | | 34,320 | | | | 0 | | | |
Synnex Technology International Corp. | | | 190,877 | | | | 361,134 | | | |
TA Chen Stainless Pipe Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 53,000 | | | | 36,312 | | | |
Tainan Spinning Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 220,000 | | | | 81,199 | | | |
Taishin Financial Holdings Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 1,054,000 | | | | 412,482 | | | |
Taiwan Business Bank(1) | | | 1,026,000 | | | | 250,523 | | | |
Taiwan Cement Corp. | | | 535,994 | | | | 549,901 | | | |
Taiwan Cooperative Bank | | | 539,330 | | | | 318,225 | | | |
Taiwan Fertilizer Co., Ltd. | | | 145,000 | | | | 450,150 | | | |
Taiwan Kolin Co., Ltd.(1)(2) | | | 177,000 | | | | 0 | | | |
Taiwan Mobile Co., Ltd. | | | 467,427 | | | | 835,969 | | | |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | | | 2,664,465 | | | | 4,833,331 | | | |
Taiwan Tea Corp.(1) | | | 361,095 | | | | 205,314 | | | |
Tatung Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 1,526,000 | | | | 336,091 | | | |
Teco Electric & Machinery Co., Ltd. | | | 482,000 | | | | 191,884 | | | |
Transcend Information, Inc. | | | 19,826 | | | | 62,007 | | | |
Tripod Technology Corp. | | | 43,401 | | | | 108,601 | | | |
Tsann Kuen Enterprise Co., Ltd. | | | 22,880 | | | | 47,135 | | | |
TSRC Corp. | | | 79,000 | | | | 92,023 | | | |
Tung Ho Steel Enterprise Corp. | | | 243,060 | | | | 231,039 | | | |
U-Ming Marine Transport Corp. | | | 186,000 | | | | 337,361 | | | |
Uni-President Enterprises Corp. | | | 820,843 | | | | 915,888 | | | |
Unimicron Technology Corp. | | | 202,000 | | | | 230,478 | | | |
United Microelectronics Corp.(1) | | | 1,574,090 | | | | 756,686 | | | |
Walsin Lihwa Corp.(1) | | | 227,000 | | | | 73,562 | | | |
Wan Hai Lines, Ltd.(1) | | | 215,250 | | | | 99,028 | | | |
Waterland Financial Holdings(1) | | | 884,377 | | | | 269,044 | | | |
Wei Chuan Food Corp.(1) | | | 165,000 | | | | 214,769 | | | |
Wistron Corp. | | | 279,578 | | | | 468,033 | | | |
WPG Holdings Co., Ltd. | | | 188,615 | | | | 258,048 | | | |
Yageo Corp. | | | 230,000 | | | | 63,390 | | | |
Yang Ming Marine Transport | | | 637,050 | | | | 225,035 | | | |
Yieh Phui Enterprise | | | 968,880 | | | | 314,315 | | | |
Yuanta Financial Holding Co., Ltd. | | | 1,220,225 | | | | 805,261 | | | |
Yuen Foong Yu Paper Manufacturing Co., Ltd.(1) | | | 266,464 | | | | 95,401 | | | |
Yulon Motor Co., Ltd. | | | 334,809 | | | | 374,490 | | | |
Zinwell Corp. | | | 44,871 | | | | 77,182 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 59,773,978 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Thailand — 3.3% |
|
Advanced Info Service PCL(5) | | | 1,040,600 | | | $ | 2,895,312 | | | |
Airports of Thailand PCL(5) | | | 491,000 | | | | 565,550 | | | |
Asian Property Development PCL(5) | | | 2,397,500 | | | | 401,675 | | | |
Bangkok Bank PCL | | | 252,500 | | | | 834,882 | | | |
Bangkok Bank PCL(5) | | | 101,800 | | | | 341,437 | | | |
Bangkok Dusit Medical Services PCL(5) | | | 284,400 | | | | 205,908 | | | |
Bangkok Expressway PCL(5) | | | 127,000 | | | | 69,912 | | | |
Bank of Ayudhya PCL(5) | | | 1,442,400 | | | | 785,633 | | | |
Banpu PCL(5) | | | 62,400 | | | | 802,288 | | | |
BEC World PCL(5) | | | 1,567,600 | | | | 1,050,538 | | | |
Big C Supercenter PCL(5) | | | 42,900 | | | | 53,906 | | | |
Bumrungrad Hospital PCL(5) | | | 415,500 | | | | 344,955 | | | |
Cal-Comp Electronics (Thailand) PCL(5) | | | 613,900 | | | | 63,915 | | | |
Central Pattana PCL(5) | | | 249,600 | | | | 162,044 | | | |
Ch. Karnchang PCL(5) | | | 892,200 | | | | 160,156 | | | |
Charoen Pokphand Foods PCL(5) | | | 4,153,900 | | | | 1,199,256 | | | |
CP ALL PCL(5) | | | 2,981,100 | | | | 1,694,567 | | | |
Delta Electronics (Thailand) PCL(5) | | | 1,087,100 | | | | 562,658 | | | |
Electricity Generating PCL(5) | | | 207,400 | | | | 469,552 | | | |
G J Steel PCL(1)(5) | | | 8,819,100 | | | | 60,685 | | | |
Glow Energy PCL | | | 470,700 | | | | 450,633 | | | |
Hana Microelectronics PCL(5) | | | 530,700 | | | | 295,318 | | | |
IRPC PCL(5) | | | 5,180,100 | | | | 595,111 | | | |
Italian-Thai Development PCL(1)(5) | | | 1,858,000 | | | | 176,767 | | | |
Kasikornbank PCL(5) | | | 526,000 | | | | 1,275,155 | | | |
Khon Kaen Sugar Industry PCL | | | 897,000 | | | | 335,452 | | | |
Kim Eng Securities Thailand PCL(5) | | | 134,000 | | | | 52,518 | | | |
Krung Thai Bank PCL(5) | | | 692,000 | | | | 182,187 | | | |
See notes to financial statements20
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Thailand (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Land & Houses PCL | | | 1,242,800 | | | $ | 207,080 | | | |
Land & Houses PCL(5) | | | 1,350,700 | | | | 241,570 | | | |
Loxley PCL(1)(5) | | | 1,072,600 | | | | 80,224 | | | |
LPN Development PCL(5) | | | 400,000 | | | | 83,770 | | | |
Major Cineplex Group PCL(5) | | | 182,300 | | | | 39,814 | | | |
Minor International PCL(5) | | | 2,325,270 | | | | 685,233 | | | |
Precious Shipping PCL(5) | | | 258,800 | | | | 143,240 | | | |
PTT Aromatics & Refining PCL(5) | | | 587,652 | | | | 374,480 | | | |
PTT Chemical PCL(5) | | | 159,800 | | | | 298,803 | | | |
PTT Exploration & Production PCL(5) | | | 584,300 | | | | 2,534,734 | | | |
PTT PCL(5) | | | 429,260 | | | | 2,966,614 | | | |
Quality House PCL(5) | | | 2,038,700 | | | | 152,483 | | | |
Ratchaburi Electricity Generating Holding PCL(5) | | | 278,700 | | | | 308,509 | | | |
Samart Corp. PCL | | | 366,600 | | | | 66,355 | | | |
Siam Cement PCL | | | 113,600 | | | | 703,828 | | | |
Siam Cement PCL(5) | | | 36,800 | | | | 222,245 | | | |
Siam City Bank PCL(5) | | | 159,500 | | | | 113,093 | | | |
Siam City Cement PCL(5) | | | 47,690 | | | | 315,318 | | | |
Siam Commercial Bank PCL(5) | | | 767,800 | | | | 1,774,497 | | | |
Siam Makro PCL(5) | | | 35,000 | | | | 83,508 | | | |
Sino Thai Engineering & Construction PCL(1)(5) | | | 2,479,500 | | | | 493,304 | | | |
Thai Airways International PCL(1)(5) | | | 256,300 | | | | 151,825 | | | |
Thai Beverage PCL | | | 4,106,000 | | | | 744,465 | | | |
Thai Oil PCL(5) | | | 451,500 | | | | 557,199 | | | |
Thai Tap Water Supply Co., Ltd | | | 1,710,000 | | | | 210,776 | | | |
Thai Union Frozen Products PCL(5) | | | 400,100 | | | | 332,170 | | | |
Thanachart Capital PCL(5) | | | 263,400 | | | | 155,242 | | | |
Thoresen Thai Agencies PCL(5) | | | 424,160 | | | | 339,455 | | | |
TMB Bank PCL(1)(5) | | | 8,975,900 | | | | 295,392 | | | |
Total Access Communication PCL | | | 474,800 | | | | 551,390 | | | |
TPI Polene PCL(1) | | | 432,000 | | | | 124,075 | | | |
True Corp. PCL(1)(5) | | | 4,165,100 | | | | 431,152 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 31,869,813 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Turkey — 3.0% |
|
Adana Cimento Sanayii TAS | | | 15,371 | | | $ | 62,517 | | | |
Akbank TAS | | | 418,950 | | | | 2,263,070 | | | |
Akcansa Cimento AS | | | 16,400 | | | | 64,948 | | | |
Akenerji Elektrik Uretim AS | | | 18,300 | | | | 164,224 | | | |
Aksa Akrilik Kimya Sanayii AS(1) | | | 60,209 | | | | 64,838 | | | |
Aksigorta AS | | | 40,300 | | | | 121,710 | | | |
Anadolu Efes Biracilik ve Malt Sanayii AS | | | 157,739 | | | | 1,802,134 | | | |
Arcelik AS(1) | | | 393,854 | | | | 1,286,189 | | | |
Asya Katilim Bankasi AS(1) | | | 300,000 | | | | 620,499 | | | |
Aygaz AS | | | 27,013 | | | | 95,686 | | | |
BIM Birlesik Magazalar AS | | | 26,630 | | | | 965,499 | | | |
Cimsa Cimento Sanayi ve Ticaret AS | | | 18,200 | | | | 78,637 | | | |
Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding AS(1) | | | 1,219,509 | | | | 802,313 | | | |
Dogan Yayin Holding AS(1) | | | 92,474 | | | | 64,319 | | | |
Eczacibasi Ilac Sanayi ve Ticaret AS | | | 127,500 | | | | 131,769 | | | |
Enka Insaat ve Sanayi AS | | | 268,348 | | | | 1,082,879 | | | |
Eregli Demir ve Celik Fabrikalari TAS(1) | | | 571,481 | | | | 1,551,368 | | | |
Ford Otomotiv Sanayi AS | | | 24,800 | | | | 155,963 | | | |
Haci Omer Sabanci Holding AS | | | 161,763 | | | | 591,405 | | | |
Hurriyet Gazetecilik ve Matbaacilik AS(1) | | | 128,238 | | | | 136,721 | | | |
Ihlas Holding AS(1) | | | 299,200 | | | | 100,951 | | | |
Is Gayrimenkul Yatirim Ortakligi AS | | | 136,465 | | | | 143,473 | | | |
Kardemir Karabuk Demir Celik Sanayi ve Ticaret AS, Class D(1) | | | 1,355,360 | | | | 536,293 | | | |
KOC Holding AS(1) | | | 634,634 | | | | 1,616,700 | | | |
Koza Davetiyeleri(1) | | | 33,000 | | | | 85,685 | | | |
Petkim Petrokimya Holding AS(1) | | | 119,300 | | | | 575,123 | | | |
Petrol Ofisi AS(1) | | | 32,978 | | | | 123,042 | | | |
Tekfen Holding AS(1) | | | 203,217 | | | | 581,885 | | | |
Tofas Turk Otomobil Fabrikasi AS | | | 34,700 | | | | 87,179 | | | |
Trakya Cam Sanayii AS(1) | | | 144,992 | | | | 170,486 | | | |
Tupras-Turkiye Petrol Rafinerileri AS | | | 86,870 | | | | 1,492,078 | | | |
Turcas Petrolculuk AS | | | 30,939 | | | | 94,585 | | | |
Turk Hava Yollari Anonim Ortakligi (THY) AS | | | 140,500 | | | | 392,243 | | | |
Turk Sise ve Cam Fabrikalari AS(1) | | | 520,300 | | | | 546,026 | | | |
Turk Telekomunikasyon AS | | | 241,000 | | | | 731,508 | | | |
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS | | | 386,800 | | | | 2,559,207 | | | |
Turkiye Garanti Bankasi AS | | | 843,000 | | | | 3,061,389 | | | |
Turkiye Halk Bankasi AS | | | 115,500 | | | | 691,226 | | | |
Turkiye Is Bankasi | | | 343,256 | | | | 1,300,021 | | | |
Turkiye Vakiflar Bankasi TAO(1) | | | 226,200 | | | | 548,552 | | | |
Ulker Gida Sanayi ve Ticaret AS | | | 25,959 | | | | 60,722 | | | |
Yapi ve Kredi Bankasi AS(1) | | | 486,385 | | | | 1,000,025 | | | |
Yazicilar Holding AS | | | 21,200 | | | | 128,530 | | | |
Zorlu Enerji Elektrik Uretim AS(1) | | | 91,054 | | | | 173,988 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 28,907,605 | | | |
|
|
|
|
United Arab Emirates — 1.5% |
|
Aabar Petroleum Investments Co. (PJSC)(1) | | | 1,512,000 | | | $ | 1,061,311 | | | |
Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank | | | 592,000 | | | | 314,009 | | | |
Abu Dhabi National Hotels | | | 326,200 | | | | 395,211 | | | |
Air Arabia | | | 2,037,000 | | | | 618,157 | | | |
Ajman Bank (PJSC)(1) | | | 634,400 | | | | 185,478 | | | |
Aldar Properties (PJSC) | | | 533,600 | | | | 843,411 | | | |
Amlak Finance (PJSC)(1) | | | 227,500 | | | | 68,997 | | | |
Arabtec Holding Co.(1) | | | 960,300 | | | | 839,349 | | | |
Aramex (PJSC)(1) | | | 893,182 | | | | 397,692 | | | |
Dana Gas(1) | | | 3,726,200 | | | | 1,160,396 | | | |
DP World, Ltd. | | | 3,916,300 | | | | 1,929,573 | | | |
See notes to financial statements21
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
United Arab Emirates (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Dubai Financial Market | | | 1,113,000 | | | $ | 706,987 | | | |
Dubai Investments (PJSC) | | | 583,777 | | | | 200,100 | | | |
Dubai Islamic Bank | | | 248,474 | | | | 199,618 | | | |
Emaar Properties (PJSC)(1) | | | 1,754,100 | | | | 2,082,689 | | | |
Emirates NBD (PJSC) | | | 381,700 | | | | 455,596 | | | |
First Gulf Bank (PJSC) | | | 146,700 | | | | 748,273 | | | |
Gulf Navigation Holding | | | 1,850,000 | | | | 377,951 | | | |
National Bank of Abu Dhabi (PJSC) | | | 250,250 | | | | 907,739 | | | |
National Central Cooling Co. (Tabreed)(1) | | | 743,356 | | | | 194,110 | | | |
Ras Al Khaimah Cement Co. | | | 327,000 | | | | 110,355 | | | |
Ras Al Khaimah Co.(1) | | | 490,450 | | | | 133,664 | | | |
Ras Al Khaimah Properties (PJSC) | | | 1,144,000 | | | | 230,979 | | | |
Sorouh Real Estate Co. | | | 388,500 | | | | 375,807 | | | |
Union National Bank | | | 359,700 | | | | 369,694 | | | |
Union Properties (PJSC)(1) | | | 290,158 | | | | 77,729 | | | |
Waha Capital (PJSC) | | | 196,900 | | | | 48,838 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,033,713 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Vietnam — 0.6% |
|
FPT Corp. | | | 58,800 | | | $ | 277,428 | | | |
Kinh Bac City Development Share Holding Corp.(1) | | | 135,000 | | | | 538,383 | | | |
PetroVietnam Drilling and Well Services JSC | | | 39,000 | | | | 198,116 | | | |
Petrovietnam Fertilizer and Chemical JSC | | | 135,900 | | | | 330,773 | | | |
Pha Lai Thermal Power JSC(1) | | | 136,990 | | | | 199,001 | | | |
Saigon Securities, Inc. | | | 274,300 | | | | 1,443,504 | | | |
Songda Urban & Industrial Zone Investment and Development JSC | | | 61,300 | | | | 635,247 | | | |
Viet Nam Construction and Import-Export JSC | | | 190,900 | | | | 671,340 | | | |
Vietnam Dairy Products JSC | | | 211,000 | | | | 1,017,391 | | | |
Vincom JSC | | | 71,795 | | | | 335,815 | | | |
Vinh Son - Song Hinh Hydropower JSC | | | 130,000 | | | | 264,796 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 5,911,794 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $878,946,098) | | $ | 942,129,560 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Convertible Bonds — 0.0% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Oman — 0.0% |
|
Bank Muscat SAOG, 7.00%, 3/20/14 | | | OMR 10,672 | | | $ | 25,443 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Convertible Bonds | | |
(identified cost $0) | | $ | 25,443 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Equity-Linked Securities — 0.7% |
|
| | Maturity
| | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Date | | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Saudi Arabia — 0.7% |
|
Al Rajhi Bank (HSBC Bank plc)(6)(7) | | | 4/30/12 | | | | 35,493 | | | $ | 716,976 | | | |
Alinma Bank (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 6/4/12 | | | | 53,800 | | | | 196,553 | | | |
Almarai Co., Ltd. (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 3/27/12 | | | | 5,000 | | | | 226,673 | | | |
Arab National Bank (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 6/4/12 | | | | 15,700 | | | | 195,941 | | | |
Banque Saudi Fransi (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 4/30/12 | | | | 16,484 | | | | 198,693 | | | |
Dar Al Arkan Real Estate Development Co. (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 8/13/12 | | | | 58,000 | | | | 258,303 | | | |
Etihad Etisalat Co. (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 4/2/12 | | | | 45,162 | | | | 540,756 | | | |
Jarir Marketing Co. (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 6/4/12 | | | | 6,500 | | | | 234,873 | | | |
Mobile Telecommunications Co. (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 6/4/12 | | | | 72,000 | | | | 208,325 | | | |
National Industrialization C (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 5/14/12 | | | | 37,300 | | | | 270,556 | | | |
Rabigh Refining and Petrochemicals Co. (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 4/2/12 | | | | 21,500 | | | | 216,152 | | | |
Riyad Bank (HSBC Bank plc)(6)(7) | | | 6/11/12 | | | | 32,800 | | | | 251,035 | | | |
Samba Financial Group (HSBC Bank plc)(6)(7) | | | 4/30/12 | | | | 15,208 | | | | 223,057 | | | |
Saudi Arabian Fertilizer Co. (HSBC Bank plc)(6)(7) | | | 6/4/12 | | | | 6,650 | | | | 207,485 | | | |
Saudi Basic Industries Corp. (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 3/26/12 | | | | 33,596 | | | | 732,413 | | | |
Saudi British Bank (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 10/2/12 | | | | 16,800 | | | | 231,847 | | | |
Saudi Cable Co. (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 9/21/12 | | | | 30,000 | | | | 232,005 | | | |
Saudi Electricity Co. (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 6/25/12 | | | | 80,000 | | | | 237,872 | | | |
Saudi Industrial Investment Group, (HSBC Bank plc)(6)(7) | | | 6/11/12 | | | | 40,000 | | | | 265,608 | | | |
Saudi International Petrochemicals Co. (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 9/21/12 | | | | 37,000 | | | | 238,287 | | | |
Saudi Kayan Petrochemical Co. (HSBC Bank plc)(1)(6)(7) | | | 6/4/12 | | | | 49,000 | | | | 247,622 | | | |
Saudi Telecom Co. (HSBC Bank plc)(6)(7) | | | 5/21/12 | | | | 24,000 | | | | 309,127 | | | |
Savola (HSBC Bank plc)(6)(7) | | | 4/20/12 | | | | 61,000 | | | | 484,761 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Equity-Linked Securities | | | | | | |
(identified cost $6,139,328) | | | | | | $ | 6,924,920 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Investment Funds — 0.4% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Saudi Arabia Investment Fund, Ltd. | | | 31,546 | | | $ | 1,236,603 | | | |
Vietnam Enterprise Investments, Ltd.(1) | | | 1,359,727 | | | | 2,719,454 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investment Funds | | |
(identified cost $7,036,614) | | $ | 3,956,057 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements22
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Rights — 0.0% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Empresas La Polar, Exp. 11/27/09(1) | | | 20,334 | | | $ | 8,043 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Rights (identified cost $0) | | $ | 8,043 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Warrants — 0.0% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Bangkok Land PCL, Exp. 5/2/13, strike THB 1.10(1) | | | 310,077 | | | $ | 1,484 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Total Warrants (identified cost $0) | | $ | 1,484 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 1.1% |
|
| | Principal
| | | | | | |
Security | | Amount | | | Value | | | |
|
|
State Street Bank & Trust Repurchase Agreement, dated 10/30/09, with a maturity date of 11/2/09, an interest rate of 0.01%, and repurchased proceeds of $10,730,009; collateralized by Federal Home Loan Bank bond with an interest rate of 4.375%, a maturity date of 9/17/10 and a market value of $10,946,988 | | $ | 10,730,000 | | | $ | 10,730,000 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $10,730,000) | | $ | 10,730,000 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 99.5% | | |
(identified cost $902,852,040) | | $ | 963,775,507 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 0.5% | | $ | 4,813,852 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 968,589,359 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
ADR - American Depositary Receipt
GDR - Global Depositary Receipt
PCL - Public Company Ltd.
PFC Shares - Preference Shares
OMR - Omani Rial
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(2) | | Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees. |
|
(3) | | Security exempt from registration under Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933, which exempts from registration securities offered and sold outside the United States. Security may not be offered or sold in the United States except pursuant to an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. |
|
(4) | | Security acquired in a delayed delivery transaction. |
|
(5) | | Indicates a foreign registered security. Shares issued to foreign investors in markets that have foreign ownership limits. |
|
(6) | | Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At October 31, 2009, the aggregate value of these securities is $6,924,920 or 0.7% of the Fund’s net assets. |
|
(7) | | Security whose performance, including redemption at maturity, is linked to the price of the underlying equity security. The investment is subject to credit risk of the issuing financial institution in addition to the market risk of the underlying security. |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Currency Concentration of Portfolio |
|
| | Percentage
| | | | | | |
Currency | | of Net Assets | | | Value | | | |
|
|
United States Dollar | | | 13.6 | % | | $ | 132,044,749 | | | |
Mexican Peso | | | 6.2 | | | | 59,637,127 | | | |
New Taiwan Dollar | | | 6.1 | | | | 59,057,346 | | | |
South African Rand | | | 6.1 | | | | 58,799,004 | | | |
Brazilian Real | | | 6.1 | | | | 58,655,229 | | | |
South Korean Won | | | 5.9 | | | | 57,357,909 | | | |
Indian Rupee | | | 5.9 | | | | 56,731,905 | | | |
Hong Kong Dollar | | | 5.8 | | | | 56,107,674 | | | |
Thailand Baht | | | 3.2 | | | | 30,575,442 | | | |
Chilean Peso | | | 3.1 | | | | 30,202,785 | | | |
Malaysian Ringgit | | | 3.1 | | | | 30,034,998 | | | |
Polish Zloty | | | 3.0 | | | | 29,307,805 | | | |
New Turkish Lira | | | 3.0 | | | | 28,907,605 | | | |
Indonesian Rupiah | | | 3.0 | | | | 28,834,751 | | | |
Hungarian Forint | | | 2.1 | | | | 20,705,120 | | | |
Czech Koruna | | | 1.9 | | | | 18,312,608 | | | |
Israeli Shekel | | | 1.6 | | | | 15,841,108 | | | |
Qatari Riyal | | | 1.6 | | | | 15,799,525 | | | |
Philippine Peso | | | 1.6 | | | | 15,404,573 | | | |
Moroccan Dirham | | | 1.6 | | | | 15,043,184 | | | |
Euro | | | 1.5 | | | | 14,910,081 | | | |
Egyptian Pound | | | 1.5 | | | | 14,487,547 | | | |
United Arab Emirates Dirham | | | 1.3 | | | | 13,104,140 | | | |
Other currency, less than 1% each | | | 10.7 | | | | 103,913,292 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | | 99.5 | % | | $ | 963,775,507 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements23
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Industry Classification of Portfolio |
|
| | Percentage
| | | | | | |
Sector | | of Net Assets | | | Value | | | |
|
|
Financials | | | 24.3 | % | | $ | 235,595,107 | | | |
Telecommunication Services | | | 11.1 | | | | 106,893,157 | | | |
Industrials | | | 10.5 | | | | 101,276,070 | | | |
Materials | | | 10.4 | | | | 100,685,107 | | | |
Energy | | | 9.7 | | | | 94,381,194 | | | |
Consumer Discretionary | | | 7.3 | | | | 70,989,052 | | | |
Consumer Staples | | | 6.9 | | | | 67,002,855 | | | |
Information Technology | | | 6.0 | | | | 58,248,021 | | | |
Diversified | | | 4.5 | | | | 43,949,933 | | | |
Utilities | | | 4.2 | | | | 40,244,041 | | | |
Health Care | | | 3.1 | | | | 29,789,943 | | | |
Other | | | 1.1 | | | | 10,764,970 | | | |
Investment Funds | | | 0.4 | | | | 3,956,057 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | | 99.5 | % | | $ | 963,775,507 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements24
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investments, at value (identified cost, $902,852,040) | | $ | 963,775,507 | | | |
Cash | | | 5,497 | | | |
Foreign currency, at value (identified cost, $1,953,104) | | | 1,944,970 | | | |
Dividends and interest receivable | | | 1,026,104 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 51,750 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 10,548,650 | | | |
Tax reclaims receivable | | | 8,634 | | | |
Receivable from affiliates | | | 30,547 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 977,391,659 | | | |
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 4,894,242 | | | |
Payable for delayed delivery transactions | | | 6,502 | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 1,869,913 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 692,201 | | | |
Administration fee | | | 125,833 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 38,229 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 2,320 | | | |
Accrued foreign capital gains taxes | | | 448,412 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 724,648 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 8,802,300 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 968,589,359 | | | |
|
|
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 949,007,967 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss | | | (48,580,158 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 7,642,943 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 60,518,607 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 968,589,359 | | | |
|
|
|
Class A Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 104,727,302 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 8,421,570 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 12.44 | | | |
Maximum Offering Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(100 ¸ 94.25 of net asset value per share) | | $ | 13.20 | | | |
|
|
|
Class C Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 16,917,666 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 1,377,649 | | | |
Net Asset Value and Offering Price Per Share* | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 12.28 | | | |
|
|
|
Class I Shares |
|
Net Assets | | $ | 846,944,391 | | | |
Shares Outstanding | | | 67,971,456 | | | |
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share | | | | | | |
(net assets ¸ shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 12.46 | | | |
|
|
On sales of $50,000 or more, the offering price of Class A shares is reduced.
| |
* | Redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value less any applicable contingent deferred sales charge. |
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
October 31, 2009 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends (net of foreign taxes, $1,679,614) | | $ | 16,513,120 | | | |
Interest | | | 260 | | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 16,513,380 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 4,772,724 | | | |
Administration fee | | | 854,671 | | | |
Distribution and service fees | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 189,851 | | | |
Class C | | | 108,667 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 23,904 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 1,526,420 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 249,988 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 89,800 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 67,080 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 88,241 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 45,018 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 8,016,364 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 312 | | | |
Allocation of expenses to affiliates | | | 101,012 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 101,324 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 7,915,040 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 8,598,340 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investments transactions, net of foreign capital gains taxes of $27,757 | | $ | (42,401,184 | ) | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | (881,729 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized loss | | $ | (43,282,913 | ) | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments, net of increase in accrued foreign capital gains taxes of $448,345 | | $ | 322,447,722 | | | |
Foreign currency | | | 165,934 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 322,613,656 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 279,330,743 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 287,929,083 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements25
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 8,598,340 | | | $ | 6,568,060 | | | |
Net realized loss from investment and foreign currency transactions | | | (43,282,913 | ) | | | (6,600,278 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | 322,613,656 | | | | (331,473,357 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations | | $ | 287,929,083 | | | $ | (331,505,575 | ) | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | (624,412 | ) | | $ | (471,949 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (11,551 | ) | | | (25,778 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (4,282,038 | ) | | | (1,661,688 | ) | | |
From net realized gain | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | — | | | | (531,214 | ) | | |
Class C | | | — | | | | (66,805 | ) | | |
Class I | | | — | | | | (1,583,872 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (4,918,001 | ) | | $ | (4,341,306 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | $ | 51,867,958 | | | $ | 101,864,082 | | | |
Class C | | | 6,034,674 | | | | 13,401,394 | | | |
Class I | | | 468,912,908 | | | | 316,476,690 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 535,855 | | | | 889,210 | | | |
Class C | | | 8,492 | | | | 58,770 | | | |
Class I | | | 2,225,488 | | | | 2,075,352 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (55,161,766 | ) | | | (40,412,113 | ) | | |
Class C | | | (3,379,341 | ) | | | (4,043,712 | ) | | |
Class I | | | (147,551,579 | ) | | | (57,995,706 | ) | | |
Redemption fees | | | 48,379 | | | | 22,156 | | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 323,541,068 | | | $ | 332,336,123 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | 606,552,150 | | | $ | (3,510,758 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
Net Assets | | October 31, 2009 | | | October 31, 2008 | | | |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 362,037,209 | | | $ | 365,547,967 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 968,589,359 | | | $ | 362,037,209 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 7,642,943 | | | $ | 4,833,026 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements26
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.290 | | | $ | 17.500 | | | $ | 11.150 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.121 | | | $ | 0.190 | | | $ | 0.110 | | | $ | 0.010 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 4.120 | | | | (9.216 | ) | | | 6.215 | | | | 1.140 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 4.241 | | | $ | (9.026 | ) | | $ | 6.325 | | | $ | 1.150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.092 | ) | | $ | (0.087 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.098 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.092 | ) | | $ | (0.185 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(2) | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.025 | | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 12.440 | | | $ | 8.290 | | | $ | 17.500 | | | $ | 11.150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 51.81 | % | | | (52.10 | )% | | | 56.95 | % | | | 11.50 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 104,727 | | | $ | 74,062 | | | $ | 81,611 | | | $ | 1,451 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(6)(7) | | | 1.57 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | % | | | 1.50 | %(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.26 | % | | | 1.33 | % | | | 0.77 | % | | | 0.32 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 11 | % | | | 5 | % | | | 6 | % | | | 6 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, June 30, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005 per share. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | The adviser and administrator waived a portion of its fees and subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.02%, 0.20%, 0.52% and 9.49% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the period ended October 31, 2006, respectively). |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements27
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class C |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.160 | | | $ | 17.320 | | | $ | 11.120 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income (loss)(2) | | $ | 0.042 | | | $ | 0.092 | | | $ | 0.010 | | | $ | (0.010 | ) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 4.087 | | | | (9.117 | ) | | | 6.190 | | | | 1.130 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 4.129 | | | $ | (9.025 | ) | | $ | 6.200 | | | $ | 1.120 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.010 | ) | | $ | (0.038 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.098 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.010 | ) | | $ | (0.136 | ) | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(2) | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 12.280 | | | $ | 8.160 | | | $ | 17.320 | | | $ | 11.120 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 50.69 | % | | | (52.50 | )% | | | 55.76 | % | | | 11.20 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 16,918 | | | $ | 9,828 | | | $ | 10,218 | | | $ | 132 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(5)(6) | | | 2.32 | % | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.25 | % | | | 2.25 | %(7) | | |
Net investment income (loss) | | | 0.44 | % | | | 0.65 | % | | | 0.06 | % | | | (0.30 | )%(7) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 11 | % | | | 5 | % | | | 6 | % | | | 6 | %(4) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, June 30, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested and do not reflect the effect of sales charges. |
|
(4) | | Not annualized. |
|
(5) | | The adviser and administrator waived a portion of its fees and subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.02%, 0.20%, 0.52% and 9.49% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the period ended October 31, 2006, respectively). |
|
(6) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(7) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements28
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class I |
| | |
| | Year Ended October 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | October 31, 2006(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.320 | | | $ | 17.540 | | | $ | 11.150 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(2) | | $ | 0.156 | | | $ | 0.231 | | | $ | 0.160 | | | $ | 0.030 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 4.109 | | | | (9.251 | ) | | | 6.232 | | | | 1.120 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 4.265 | | | $ | (9.020 | ) | | $ | 6.392 | | | $ | 1.150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.126 | ) | | $ | (0.103 | ) | | $ | (0.002 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
From net realized gain | | | — | | | | (0.098 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.126 | ) | | $ | (0.201 | ) | | $ | (0.002 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Redemption fees(2) | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.001 | | | $ | 0.000 | (3) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 12.460 | | | $ | 8.320 | | | $ | 17.540 | | | $ | 11.150 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 52.15 | % | | | (51.99 | )% | | | 57.34 | % | | | 11.50 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 846,944 | | | $ | 278,147 | | | $ | 273,719 | | | $ | 15,405 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses(6)(7) | | | 1.33 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | % | | | 1.25 | %(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 1.56 | % | | | 1.62 | % | | | 1.12 | % | | | 0.88 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 11 | % | | | 5 | % | | | 6 | % | | | 6 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, June 30, 2006, to October 31, 2006. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | Amount represents less than $0.0005 per share. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | The adviser and administrator waived a portion of its fees and subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.02%, 0.20%, 0.52% and 9.49% of average daily net assets for the years ended October 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the period ended October 31, 2006, respectively). |
|
(7) | | Excludes the effect of custody fee credits, if any, of less than 0.005%. |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements29
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation. The Fund offers three classes of shares. Class A shares are generally sold subject to a sales charge imposed at time of purchase. Class C shares are sold at net asset value and are generally subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (see Note 5). Class I shares are sold at net asset value and are not subject to a sales charge. Each class represents a pro-rata interest in the Fund, but votes separately on class-specific matters and (as noted below) is subject to different expenses. Realized and unrealized gains and losses and net investment income and losses, other than class-specific expenses, are allocated daily to each class of shares based on the relative net assets of each class to the total net assets of the Fund. Each class of shares differs in its distribution plan and certain other class-specific expenses.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A source of authoritative accounting principles applied in the preparation of the Fund’s financial statements is the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification), which superseded existing non-Securities and Exchange Commission accounting and reporting standards for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification for the current reporting period did not impact the Fund’s application of generally accepted accounting principles.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) will normally be valued on the basis of quotations provided by third party pricing services. The pricing services will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, reported trades or dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Fund in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted
30
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. However, if the ex-dividend date has passed, certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as the Fund is informed of the ex-dividend date. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends and capital gains have been provided for in accordance with the Fund’s understanding of the applicable countries’ tax rules and rates. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
In addition to the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, the Fund may also be subject to local taxes on the recognition of capital gains in certain countries. In determining the daily net asset value, the Fund estimates the accrual for such taxes, if any, based on the unrealized appreciation on certain portfolio securities and the related tax rates. Tax expense attributable to unrealized appreciation is included in the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments. Capital gains taxes on securities sold are included in net realized gain (loss) on investments.
At October 31, 2009, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $41,752,868 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on October 31, 2016 ($5,017,454) and October 31, 2017 ($36,735,414).
As of October 31, 2009, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended October 31, 2009 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
F Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
G Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
H Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
I Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund, and shareholders are indemnified against personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
J Redemption Fees — Upon the redemption or exchange of shares by Class A or Class I shareholders within 90 days of the settlement of purchase, a fee of 1% of the current net asset value of these shares will be
31
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
assessed and retained by the Fund for the benefit of the remaining shareholders. The redemption fee is accounted for as an addition to paid-in capital.
K Repurchase Agreements — The Fund may enter into repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Treasury obligations, U.S. agency obligations, commercial paper and mortgage-backed securities involving any or all of its assets with banks and broker-dealers determined to be creditworthy by the Fund’s investment adviser, Eaton Vance Management (EVM). Under a repurchase agreement, the Fund buys a security at one price and simultaneously promises to sell that same security back to the seller at a higher price for settlement at a later date. The Fund’s repurchase agreements provide that the value of the collateral underlying the repurchase agreement will always be at least equal to the repurchase price, including any accrued interest earned on the repurchase agreement, and will be marked to market daily. The repurchase date is usually overnight, but may be within seven days of the original purchase date. In the event of bankruptcy of the counterparty or a third party custodian, the Fund might experience delays in recovering its cash or experience a loss.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make at least one distribution annually (normally in December) of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions are declared separately for each class of shares. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the same class of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, at the election of the shareholder, receive distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
| | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 4,918,001 | | | $ | 3,219,590 | | | |
Long-term capital gains | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,121,716 | | | |
During the year ended October 31, 2009, accumulated net realized loss was decreased by $870,422 and accumulated undistributed net investment income was decreased by $870,422 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss) and investments in passive foreign investment companies (PFICs). These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of October 31, 2009, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 8,716,377 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (41,752,868 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 52,617,883 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales and investments in PFICs.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by EVM as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.85% of the Fund’s average daily net assets up to $500 million, 0.80% from $500 million up to $1 billion and at reduced rates as daily net assets exceed that level, and is payable monthly. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the investment adviser fee amounted to $4,772,724 or 0.83% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. Pursuant to a sub-advisory agreement, EVM has delegated the investment management of the Fund to Parametric Portfolio Associates, LLC (Parametric), an affiliate of EVM. EVM pays Parametric a portion of its advisory fee for sub-advisory services provided to the Fund. The administration fee is earned by EVM for administering the business affairs of the Fund and is computed at an annual rate of 0.15% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the administration fee amounted to $854,671.
EVM has agreed to waive its fees and reimburse expenses to the extent that total annual operating expenses exceed 1.60%, 2.35% and 1.35% of the average daily net assets of Class A, Class C and Class I, respectively, through February 28, 2010. Thereafter, the waiver and reimbursement may be changed or terminated at any time. Prior to March 1, 2009, EVM had agreed to waive its fees and reimburse expenses to the extent that total annual operating expenses exceeded 1.50%, 2.25% and 1.25% of the average daily net assets of Class A, Class C and Class I, respectively. Pursuant to these agreements, EVM waived fees and reimbursed expenses of $101,012 for the year ended October 31, 2009.
32
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
EVM serves as the sub-transfer agent of the Fund and receives from the transfer agent an aggregate fee based upon the actual expenses incurred by EVM in the performance of these services. For the year ended October 31, 2009, EVM earned $8,106 in sub-transfer agent fees. The Fund was informed that Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), an affiliate of EVM and the Fund’s principal underwriter, received $18,206 as its portion of the sales charge on sales of Class A shares for the year ended October 31, 2009. EVD also received distribution and service fees from Class A and Class C shares (see Note 4) and contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5).
Except for Trustees of the Fund who are not members of EVM’s organization, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Fund who are not affiliated with EVM may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the year ended October 31, 2009, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund are officers of EVM.
4 Distribution Plans
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan for Class A shares (Class A Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class A Plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution and service fee of 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class A shares for distribution services and facilities provided to the Fund by EVD, as well as for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Distribution and service fees paid or accrued to EVD for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $189,851 for Class A shares.
The Fund also has in effect a distribution plan for Class C shares (Class C Plan) pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The Class C Plan requires the Fund to pay EVD amounts equal to 0.75% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to Class C shares for providing ongoing distribution services and facilities to the Fund. The Fund will automatically discontinue payments to EVD during any period in which there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges, which are equivalent to the sum of (i) 6.25% of the aggregate amount received by the Fund for Class C shares sold, plus (ii) interest calculated by applying the rate of 1% over the prevailing prime rate to the outstanding balance of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD of Class C, reduced by the aggregate amount of contingent deferred sales charges (see Note 5) and amounts theretofore paid or payable to EVD by Class C. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund paid or accrued to EVD $81,500 for Class C shares representing 0.75% of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. At October 31, 2009, the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD calculated under the Class C Plan was approximately $1,299,000.
The Class C Plan also authorizes the Fund to make payments of service fees to EVD, financial intermediaries and other persons equal to 0.25% per annum of its average daily net assets attributable to that class. Service fees paid or accrued are for personal services and/or the maintenance of shareholder accounts. They are separate and distinct from the sales commissions and distribution fees payable to EVD and, as such, are not subject to automatic discontinuance when there are no outstanding Uncovered Distribution Charges of EVD. Service fees paid or accrued for the year ended October 31, 2009 amounted to $27,167 for Class C shares.
5 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges
A contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) of 1% generally is imposed on redemptions of Class C shares made within one year of purchase. Class A shares may be subject to a 1% CDSC if redeemed within 18 months of purchase (depending on the circumstances of purchase). Generally, the CDSC is based upon the lower of the net asset value at date of redemption or date of purchase. No charge is levied on shares acquired by reinvestment of dividends or capital gain distributions. No CDSC is levied on shares which have been sold to EVM or its affiliates or to their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. CDSCs received on Class C redemptions are paid to EVD to reduce the amount of Uncovered Distribution Charges calculated under the Fund’s Class C Plan. CDSCs received on Class C redemptions when no Uncovered Distribution Charges exist are credited to the Fund. For the year ended October 31, 2009, the Fund was informed that EVD received approximately $17,000 and $14,000 of CDSCs paid by Class A and Class C shareholders, respectively.
6 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $376,944,049 and $64,090,361, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2009.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund) and classes. Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
33
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class A | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 5,726,915 | | | | 7,647,293 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 67,744 | | | | 53,728 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (6,304,186 | ) | | | (3,432,341 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (509,527 | ) | | | 4,268,680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class C | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 569,119 | | | | 941,092 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 1,081 | | | | 3,583 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (396,257 | ) | | | (331,065 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 173,943 | | | | 613,610 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended October 31, |
Class I | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 51,045,504 | | | | 22,610,736 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 281,707 | | | | 125,248 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (16,779,246 | ) | | | (4,920,012 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 34,547,965 | | | | 17,815,972 | | | |
|
|
For the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, the Fund received $48,379 and $22,156, respectively, in redemption fees.
8 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Fund at October 31, 2009, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 910,752,764 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 130,462,151 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (77,439,408 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 53,022,743 | | | |
|
|
9 Line of Credit
The Fund participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Fund solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Fund based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. The Fund did not have any significant borrowings or allocated fees during the year ended October 31, 2009.
10 Risks Associated with Foreign Investments
Investing in securities issued by companies whose principal business activities are outside the United States may involve significant risks not present in domestic investments. For example, there is generally less publicly available information about foreign companies, particularly those not subject to the disclosure and reporting requirements of the U.S. securities laws. Certain foreign issuers are generally not bound by uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting requirements and standards of practice comparable to those applicable to domestic issuers. Investments in foreign securities also involve the risk of possible adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations, expropriation or confiscatory taxation, limitation on the removal of funds or other assets of the Fund, political or financial instability or diplomatic and other developments which could affect such investments. Foreign stock markets, while growing in volume and sophistication, are generally not as developed as those in the United States, and securities of some foreign issuers (particularly those located in developing countries) may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. companies. In general, there is less overall governmental supervision and regulation of foreign securities markets, broker-dealers and issuers than in the United States.
11 Fair Value Measurements
The Fund adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (FAS 157), “Fair Value Measurements”, (currently FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820-10), effective November 1, 2008. Such standard established a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
34
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At October 31, 2009, the inputs used in valuing the Fund’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | Total | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | | | | |
|
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Asia/Pacific | | $ | 32,218,550 | | | $ | 317,408,830 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 349,627,380 | | | |
Emerging Europe | | | 12,364,613 | | | | 184,947,168 | | | | 0 | | | | 197,311,781 | | | |
Latin America | | | 178,453,211 | | | | — | | | | 0 | | | | 178,453,211 | | | |
Middle East/Africa | | | 47,651,389 | | | | 169,085,799 | | | | — | | | | 216,737,188 | | | |
|
|
Total Common Stocks | | $ | 270,687,763 | | | $ | 671,441,797 | * | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 942,129,560 | | | |
Convertible Bonds | | | — | | | | 25,443 | | | | — | | | | 25,443 | | | |
Equity-Linked Securities | | | — | | | | 6,924,920 | | | | — | | | | 6,924,920 | | | |
Investment Funds | | | — | | | | 3,956,057 | | | | — | | | | 3,956,057 | | | |
Rights | | | 8,043 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,043 | | | |
Warrants | | | 1,484 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,484 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | — | | | | 10,730,000 | | | | — | | | | 10,730,000 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 270,697,290 | | | $ | 693,078,217 | | | $ | 0 | | | $ | 963,775,507 | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Includes foreign equity securities whose values were adjusted to reflect market trading that occurred after the close of trading in their applicable foreign markets. |
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
| | | | | | |
| | Investments in
| | | |
| | Common Stocks | | | |
|
Balance as of October 31, 2008 | | $ | 0 | | | |
Realized gains (losses) | | | — | | | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)* | | | 0 | | | |
Net purchases (sales) | | | 0 | | | |
Accrued discount (premium) | | | — | | | |
Net transfers to (from) Level 3 | | | — | | | |
|
|
Balance as of October 31, 2009 | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments still held as of October 31, 2009* | | $ | 0 | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount is included in the related amount on investments in the Statement of Operations. |
All Level 3 investments held at October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 were valued at $0.
12 Review for Subsequent Events
In connection with the preparation of the financial statements of the Fund as of and for the year ended October 31, 2009, events and transactions subsequent to October 31, 2009 through December 21, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued, have been evaluated by the Fund’s management for possible adjustment and/or disclosure. Management has not identified any subsequent events requiring financial statement disclosure as of the date these financial statements were issued.
35
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds
Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance Structured
Emerging Markets Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund (the ”Fund”)(one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2009, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights, based on our audits. The financial highlights for the period from the start of business, June 30, 2006, to October 31, 2006, were audited by other auditors. Those auditors expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial highlights in their report dated December 20, 2006.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2009, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 21, 2009
36
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund as of October 31, 2009
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
The Form 1099-DIV you receive in January 2010 will show the tax status of all distributions paid to your account in calendar year 2009. Shareholders are advised to consult their own tax adviser with respect to the tax consequences of their investment in the Fund. As required by the Internal Revenue Code regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of qualified dividend income for individuals and the foreign tax credit.
Qualified Dividend Income. The Fund designates $11,212,254 or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
Foreign Tax Credit. The Fund paid foreign taxes of $1,597,789 and recognized foreign source income of $18,192,734.
37
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 27, 2009, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board (formerly the Special Committee), which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held in February, March and April 2009. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | Comparative information concerning fees charged by each adviser for managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing the fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
38
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2009, the Board met eighteen times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met seven, five, six, six and six times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), and the sub-advisory agreement with Parametric Portfolio Associates (the “Sub-adviser”), including the fee structure of each agreement, are in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreements. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreements. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve the investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement for the Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement and sub-advisory agreement of the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and the Sub-adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s and Sub-adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Fund. The Board evaluated the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as special considerations relevant to investing in emerging markets. The Board noted the Adviser’s in-house equity research capabilities. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation paid to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund by senior management. With respect to the Sub-adviser, the Board noted the Sub-adviser’s experience in deploying quantitative-based investment strategies.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof, including the Sub-adviser. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
The Board considered the Adviser’s recommendations for Board action and other steps taken in response to the unprecedented dislocations experienced in the capital markets over recent periods, including sustained periods of high volatility, credit disruption and
39
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ ANNUAL APPROVAL OF THE INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT CONT’D
government intervention. In particular, the Board considered the Adviser’s efforts and expertise with respect to each of the following matters as they relate to the Fund and/or other funds within the Eaton Vance family of funds: (i) negotiating and maintaining the availability of bank loan facilities and other sources of credit used for investment purposes or to satisfy liquidity needs; (ii) establishing the fair value of securities and other instruments held in investment portfolios during periods of market volatility and issuer-specific disruptions; and (iii) the ongoing monitoring of investment management processes and risk controls.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services to be provided by the Adviser and Sub-adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory and sub-advisory agreements.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-year ended September 30, 2008 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the Fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including any administrative fee rates, paid by the Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the Fund’s management fees and expense ratio for the one-year ended September 30, 2008. The Board considered the fact that the Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses for the Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded with respect to the Fund that the management fees charged for advisory and related services and the Fund’s total expense ratio are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof, including the Sub-adviser, in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser or Sub-adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Fund and other investment advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates, including the Sub-adviser, are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, including the Sub-adviser, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Portfolios and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. The Board noted the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates, including the Sub-adviser, and the Fund.
40
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the Trust) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corp., “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “Parametric” refers to Parametric Portfolio Associates LLC and “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 5/31/58 | | Trustee and President | | Trustee since 2007 and President since 2002 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 176 registered investment companies and 4 private investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust. | | | 176 | | | Director of EVC |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1/2/63 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 4/3/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 176 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 9/19/47 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (since 2006). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 7/10/40 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 3/22/48 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Adjunct Professor of Finance, Peking University, Beijing, China (since 2005). | | | 176 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Heidi L. Steiger 7/8/53 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Managing Partner, Topridge Associates LLC (global wealth management firm) (since 2008); Senior Advisor (since 2008), President (2005-2008), Lowenhaupt Global Advisors, LLC (global wealth management firm). Formerly, President and Contributing Editor, Worth Magazine (2004-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Global Head of Private Asset Management (and various other positions), Neuberger Berman (investment firm) (1986-2004). | | | 176 | | | Director of Nuclear Electric Insurance Ltd. (nuclear insurance provider), Aviva USA (insurance provider) and CIFG (family of financial guaranty companies) and Advisory Director of Berkshire Capital Securities LLC (private investment banking firm) |
41
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | | | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | Overseen By
| | | |
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years | | Trustee(1) | | | Other Directorships Held |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 9/14/57 | | Trustee | | Since 1998 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. | | | 176 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1/26/43 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. | | | 176 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
William H. Ahern, Jr. 7/28/59 | | Vice President | | Since 1995 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 76 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John R. Baur 2/10/70 | | Vice President | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, attended Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University (2002-2005), and prior thereto he was an Account Team Representative in Singapore for Applied Materials, Inc. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael A. Cirami 12/24/75 | | Vice President | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Cynthia J. Clemson 3/2/63 | | Vice President | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 92 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Charles B. Gaffney 12/4/72 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Director of Equity Research and a Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Christine M. Johnston 11/9/72 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Aamer Khan 6/7/60 | | Vice President | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 35 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Thomas H. Luster 4/8/62 | | Vice President | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 54 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Robert B. MacIntosh 1/22/57 | | Vice President | | Since 1998 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 91 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Jeffrey A. Rawlins 10/6/61 | | Vice President | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Previously, a Managing Director of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management (1989-2005). Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 10/26/57 | | Vice President | | Since 2001 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 82 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Judith A. Saryan 8/21/54 | | Vice President | | Since 2003 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 51 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Susan Schiff 3/13/61 | | Vice President | | Since 2002 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 37 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
42
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Date of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Thomas Seto 9/27/62 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President and Director of Portfolio Management of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
David M. Stein 5/4/51 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer of Parametric. Officer of 32 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Dan R. Strelow 5/27/59 | | Vice President | | Since 2009 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2005. Previously, a Managing Director (since 1988) and Chief Investment Officer (since 2001) of the Fixed Income Group at State Street Research and Management. Officer of 31 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Mark S. Venezia 5/23/49 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 38 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Adam A. Weigold 3/22/75 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 69 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 6/19/57 | | Treasurer | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 5/24/60 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 7/11/53 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 176 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
43
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser and Administrator of
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Sub-Adviser of Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets FundParametric Portfolio Associates, LLC
1151 Fairview Avenue N.
Seattle, WA 98109
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
PNC Global Investment Servicing
Attn: Eaton Vance Funds
P.O. Box 9653
Providence, RI 02940-9653
(800) 262-1122
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help Investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling 1-800-262-1122.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrant’s Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp (specialty finance company). Previously, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) and as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (“UAM”) (a holding company owning institutional investment management firms).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
(a)-(d)
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund, Eaton Vance Multi-Cap Growth Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund, Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund, Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund, Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund, Eaton Vance International Income Fund, Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund, Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund, Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund, Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund, Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund, Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund, Eaton Vance International Equity Fund, Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund, (the “Fund(s)”) are series of Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust (the “Trust”), a Massachusetts business trust, which, including the Funds, contains a total of 30 series (the “Series”). The Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end management investment company. This Form N-CSR relates to the Funds’ annual reports.
The following tables present the aggregate fees billed to each Fund for the Fund’s respective fiscal years ended October 31, 2008 and October 31, 2009 by the Fund’s principal accountant, Deloite & Touche LLP (D&T) for professional services rendered for the audit of the Fund’s annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by D&T during such periods.
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Value Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 11,260 | | | $ | 10,225 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 6,770 | | | | 6,770 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 18,030 | | | $ | 18,495 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Mid-Cap Core Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 11,260 | | | $ | 10,225 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 7,010 | | | | 7,010 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 18,270 | | | $ | 18,735 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 13,550 | | | $ | 12,515 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 6,770 | | | | 7,020 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 20,320 | | | $ | 21,035 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Value Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 15,850 | | | $ | 14,815 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 7,010 | | | | 7,010 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 22,860 | | | $ | 23,325 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed International Equity Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 13,550 | | | $ | 12,515 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 6,890 | | | | 6,890 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 20,440 | | | $ | 20,905 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 17,960 | | | $ | 16,925 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 7,010 | | | | 7,010 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 24,970 | | | $ | 25,435 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 51,835 | | | $ | 50,800 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 18,690 | | | | 18,690 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 2,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 70,525 | | | $ | 71,990 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 14,850 | | | $ | 13,815 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 6,770 | | | | 8,020 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 21,620 | | | $ | 23,335 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 14,600 | | | $ | 13,565 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 7,010 | | | | 7,760 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 21,610 | | | $ | 22,825 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 14,600 | | | $ | 13,565 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 7,010 | | | | 8,260 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 21,610 | | | $ | 23,325 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 19,665 | | | $ | 18,630 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 10,350 | | | | 10,725 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 2,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 30,015 | | | $ | 31,855 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 11,905 | | | $ | 10,870 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 8,800 | | | | 9,175 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 20,705 | | | $ | 21,545 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance International Income Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 11,905 | | | $ | 10,870 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 8,800 | | | | 9,050 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 20,705 | | | $ | 21,420 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Low Duration Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 25,875 | | | $ | 25,840 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 12,420 | | | | 13,420 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 2,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 38,295 | | | $ | 41,760 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Government Obligations Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 25,875 | | | $ | 25,840 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 11,390 | | | | 12,140 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 37,265 | | | $ | 39,480 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Diversified Income Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 19,665 | | | $ | 18,630 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 16,530 | | | | 16,280 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 2,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 36,195 | | | $ | 37,410 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Period Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 17,585 | | | $ | 16,550 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 20,000 | | | | 21,000 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 2,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 37,585 | | | $ | 40,050 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Large-Cap Core Research Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 24,835 | | | $ | 23,800 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 8,080 | | | | 8,080 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 5 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 32,920 | | | $ | 33,380 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Dividend Income Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 51,315 | | | $ | 50,280 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 10,310 | | | | 10,310 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 194 | | | | 2,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 61,819 | | | $ | 63,090 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Dividend Income Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 13,690 | | | $ | 12,655 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 8,570 | | | | 8,570 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 22,260 | | | $ | 22,725 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance International Equity Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 13,690 | | | $ | 12,655 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 8,570 | | | | 8,570 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 22,260 | | | $ | 22,725 | |
| | |
Eaton Vance Structured Emerging Markets Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 10/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 71,415 | | | $ | 70,380 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | | 11,390 | | | | 11,390 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 1,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 82,805 | | | $ | 83,270 | |
| | |
| | |
1) | | Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of financial statements and are not reported under the category of audit fees. |
|
(2) | | Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically include fees for tax return preparation. |
|
(3) | | All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax services. |
The various Series comprising the Trust have differing fiscal year ends (October 31 or December 31). The following table presents the aggregate audit, audit-related, tax, and other fees billed to all of the Series in the Trust by each Series’ respective principal accountant for the last two fiscal years of each Series.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years | | 12/31/07 | | 10/31/08 | | 12/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
Ended | | D&T | | D&T | | D&T | | D&T |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 100,290 | | | $ | 939,405 | | | $ | 107,310 | | | $ | 529,055 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | $ | 24,068 | | | $ | 309,560 | | | $ | 24,930 | | | $ | 256,590 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | | 0 | | | | 58,322 | | | | 0 | | | | 44,500 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 124,358 | | | $ | 1,307,287 | | | $ | 133,010 | | | $ | 830,145 | |
| | |
| | |
(1) | | Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of financial statements and are not reported under the category of audit fees. |
|
(2) | | Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically include fees for tax return preparation. |
|
(3) | | All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax services. |
For both the Funds’ fiscal years ended October 31, 2008 and October 31, 2009, the Fund was billed $40,000, by D&T, for work done in connection with its Rule 17Ad-13 examination of Eaton Vance Management’s assertion that it has maintained an effective internal control structure over sub-transfer agent and registrar functions, such services being pre-approved in accordance with Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X.
(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the pre-approval of services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant (the “Pre-Approval Policies”). The Pre-Approval Policies establish a framework intended to assist the audit committee in the proper discharge of its pre-approval responsibilities. As a general matter, the Pre-Approval Policies (i) specify certain types of audit, audit-related, tax, and other services determined to be pre-approved by the audit committee; and (ii) delineate specific procedures governing the mechanics of the pre-approval process, including the approval and monitoring of audit and non-audit service fees. Unless a service is specifically pre-approved under the Pre-Approval Policies, it must be separately pre-approved by the audit committee.
The Pre-Approval Policies and the types of audit and non-audit services pre-approved therein must be reviewed and ratified by the registrant’s audit committee at least annually. The registrant’s audit committee maintains full responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the registrant’s principal accountant.
(e)(2) No services described in paragraphs (b)-(d) above were approved by the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to the “de minimis exception” set forth in Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) The following table presents (i) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed for services rendered to all of the Series in the Trust by each Series’s respective principal accountant for the last two fiscal years of each Series; and (ii) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the Eaton Vance organization by each Series’ respective principal accountant for the last two fiscal years of each Series.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years | | 12/31/07 | | 10/31/08 | | 12/31/08 | | 10/31/09 |
Ended | | D&T | | D&T | | D&T | | D&T |
|
Registrant(1) | | $ | 24,068 | | | $ | 367,882 | | | $ | 24,930 | | | $ | 301,090 | |
Eaton Vance(2) | | $ | 281,446 | | | $ | 325,329 | | | $ | 345,473 | | | $ | 280,861 | |
| | |
(1) | | Includes all of the Series of the Trust. During the fiscal years reported above, certain of the Funds were “feeder” funds in a “master-feeder” fund structure or funds of funds. |
|
(2) | | Various subsidiaries of Eaton Vance Corp. act in either an investment advisory and/or service provider capacity with respect to the Series and/or their respective “master” funds (if applicable). |
(h) The registrant’s audit committee has considered whether the provision by the registrant’s principal accountant of non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant
that were not pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed registrants
Not required in this filing.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not required in this filing.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
| | |
(a)(1) | | Registrant’s Code of Ethics – Not applicable (please see Item 2). |
(a)(2)(i) | | Treasurer’s Section 302 certification. |
(a)(2)(ii) | | President’s Section 302 certification. |
(b) | | Combined Section 906 certification. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Eaton Vance Mutual Funds Trust
| | | | |
| By: | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr. | |
| | Thomas E. Faust Jr. | |
| | President | |
Date: December 15, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | |
| By: | /s/ Barbara E. Campbell | |
| | Barbara E. Campbell | |
| | Treasurer | |
Date: December 15, 2009
| | | | |
| By: | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr. | |
| | Thomas E. Faust Jr. | |
| | President | |
Date: December 15, 2009