UNITED STATES | ||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | ||
Washington, D.C. 20549 | ||
FORM N-CSR | ||
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT | ||
INVESTMENT COMPANIES | ||
Investment Company Act file number: 811-4764 | ||
DREYFUS PREMIER MUNICIPAL BOND FUND | ||
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter) | ||
c/o The Dreyfus Corporation | ||
200 Park Avenue | ||
New York, New York 10166 | ||
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) | ||
Mark N. Jacobs, Esq. | ||
200 Park Avenue | ||
New York, New York 10166 | ||
(Name and address of agent for service) | ||
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 922-6000 | ||
Date of fiscal year end: | 04/30 | |
Date of reporting period: | 04/30/05 |
FORM N-CSR
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
Dreyfus Premier |
Municipal Bond Fund |
ANNUAL REPORT April 30, 2005
Save time. Save paper. View your next shareholder report online as soon as it's available. Log into www.dreyfus.com and sign up for Dreyfus eCommunications. It's simple and only takes a few minutes.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views.These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
Not FDIC-Insured • Not Bank-Guaranteed • May Lose Value
Contents | ||
THE FUND | ||
2 | Letter from the Chairman | |
3 | Discussion of Fund Performance | |
6 | Fund Performance | |
8 | Understanding Your Fund's Expenses | |
8 | Comparing Your Fund's Expenses | |
With Those of Other Funds | ||
9 | Statement of Investments | |
20 | Statement of Financial Futures | |
21 | Statement of Assets and Liabilities | |
22 | Statement of Operations | |
23 | Statement of Changes in Net Assets | |
25 | Financial Highlights | |
29 | Notes to Financial Statements | |
37 | Report of Independent Registered | |
Public Accounting Firm | ||
38 | Important Tax Information | |
39 | Board Members Information | |
41 | Officers of the Fund | |
FOR MORE INFORMATION | ||
Back Cover |
Dreyfus Premier Municipal Bond Fund |
The Fund
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present this annual report for Dreyfus Premier Municipal Bond Fund, covering the 12-month period from May 1, 2004, through April 30, 2005. Inside, you'll find valuable information about how the fund was managed during the reporting period, including a discussion with the fund's portfolio managers, James Welch and W. Michael Petty.
The reporting period produced mixed results for most fixed-income securities. Although the Federal Reserve Board began to raise short-term interest rates in June 2004, longer-term bonds have remained remarkably resilient through 2004. Nonetheless, the first four months of 2005 saw heightened market volatility as higher interest rates and renewed inflationary pressures took their toll.These factors led to price erosion later in the reporting period among most municipal bonds, especially those with intermediate-term maturities.
Nonetheless, municipal bonds generally have held up well compared to previous periods of rising short-term interest rates, due in part to continued strong investor demand and a more moderate supply of newly issued securities. In our view, the tax-exempt bond market's relative strength represents yet another example of how a long-term investment perspective and a steady asset allocation strategy can benefit investors. As always, we encourage you to talk regularly with your financial advisor about the investment strategies that may be appropriate for you.
Thank you for your continued confidence and support.
Stephen E. Canter Chairman and Chief Executive Officer The Dreyfus Corporation May 16, 2005 |
2
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
James Welch and W. Michael Petty, Portfolio Managers
How did Dreyfus Premier Municipal Bond Fund perform relative to its benchmark?
For the 12-month period ended April 30, 2005, the fund achieved total returns of 7.18% for Class A shares, 6.64% for Class B shares and 6.40% for Class C shares, and from its inception on October 13, 2004, through April 30, 2004, the fund's Class Z shares achieved a total return of 2.71% .1 The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index, the fund's benchmark, achieved a total return of 6.81% for the same period.2 In addition, the fund is reported in the Lipper General Municipal Debt Funds category. Over the reporting period, the average total return for all funds reported in the category was 5.93% . 3
On October 13, 2004, the fund began to offer Class Z shares generally only to shareholders of General Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. —which transferred all of its assets into the fund and then ceased operations. On October 14, 2004, W. Michael Petty and James Welch became co-portfolio managers of the fund.
Despite rising interest rates and inflationary pressures, longer-term municipal bonds fared relatively well over the reporting period. The fund produced returns that were in line with its benchmark and higher than its Lipper category average, primarily due to our emphasis on credit quality and focus on securities in the 25-year maturity range, which helped us avoid heightened volatility among shorter-term bonds as interest rates rose.
What is the fund's investment approach?
The fund seeks to maximize current income exempt from federal income tax to the extent consistent with the preservation of capital.To pursue its goal, the fund normally invests substantially all of its assets in municipal bonds that provide income exempt from federal income tax. The fund invests at least 70% of its assets in investment-grade municipal bonds or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus. The fund may invest up to 30% of its assets in municipal bonds rated below invest-
The Fund 3
DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE (continued)
ment grade or the unrated equivalent as determined by Dreyfus. Under normal market conditions, the dollar-weighted average maturity of the fund's portfolio is expected to exceed 10 years.
We may buy and sell bonds based on credit quality, market outlook and yield potential. In selecting municipal bonds for investment, we may assess the current interest-rate environment and a municipal bond's potential volatility in different rate environments.We focus on bonds with the potential to offer attractive current income, typically looking for bonds that can provide consistently attractive current yields or that are trading at competitive market prices.A portion of the fund's assets may be allocated to "discount" bonds, which are bonds that sell at a price below their face value, or to "premium" bonds, which are bonds that sell at a price above their face value.The fund's allocation either to discount bonds or to premium bonds will change along with our changing views of the current interest-rate and market environments.We may also look to select bonds that are most likely to obtain attractive prices when sold.
What other factors influenced the fund's performance?
Surging commodity prices and strengthening labor markets stoked long-dormant inflation fears and led to heightened market volatility in the spring of 2005. These factors also prompted the Federal Reserve Board (the "Fed") to raise short-term interest rates in late June 2004. Six additional increases followed, and the overnight federal funds rate rose from 1% at the start of the reporting period to 2.75% by the end.
While higher short-term rates historically have eroded the value of bonds across the full maturity spectrum, longer-term bonds held up surprisingly well during the reporting period. Investors' inflation concerns eased amid relatively moderate economic growth, and the Fed's well-telegraphed changes in monetary policy removed some uncertainty from the market. During the first quarter of 2005, however, inflationary pressures appeared to be more sustained, and heightened volatility returned to the fixed-income markets.
The fund's performance also was influenced by higher tax revenues for most states in the recovering economy, which relieved many of the fis-
4
cal pressures they had experienced during the downturn. Although improved fiscal conditions reduced the need to finance budget deficits, the supply of newly issued securities rose during the reporting period as issuers took advantage of low borrowing rates to refund their seasoned, higher-coupon debt.
Because longer-term rates remained relatively stable as short-term interest rates rose, our focus on bonds in the 25-year maturity range benefited the fund's performance. In addition, yield differences among bonds with various credit ratings narrowed beyond historical norms, and we upgraded the fund's overall credit quality without significantly sacrificing income. Finally, the fund received strong contributions to performance from securities backed by the states' settlement with U.S. tobacco companies, which gained value as litigation-related concerns eased.When purchasing new securities, we focused primarily on premium-priced, callable bonds that, in our view, tend to hold up well during market declines.
What is the fund's current strategy?
Just days after the reporting period ended, the Fed raised short-term interest rates for the eighth consecutive time, and additional increases are expected.Accordingly, we have maintained the fund's focus on premium bonds and emphasis on credit quality.
May 16, 2005
1 | Total return includes reinvestment of dividends and any capital gains paid, and does not take into | |
consideration the maximum initial sales charge in the case of Class A shares or the applicable | ||
contingent deferred sales charges imposed on redemptions in the case of Class B and Class C | ||
shares. Had these charges been reflected, returns would have been lower. Past performance is no | ||
guarantee of future results. Share price, yield and investment return fluctuate such that upon | ||
redemption, fund shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Income may be subject | ||
to state and local taxes, and some income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax | ||
(AMT) for certain investors. Capital gains, if any, are fully taxable. Return figure provided for | ||
Class Z shares reflects the absorption of expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an | ||
agreement in effect until at least April 30, 2006. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the | ||
return would have been lower. | ||
2 | SOURCE: LIPPER INC. — Reflects reinvestment of dividends and, where applicable, capital | |
gain distributions.The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index is a widely accepted, unmanaged | ||
total return performance benchmark for the long-term, investment-grade, tax-exempt bond market. | ||
Index returns do not reflect fees and expenses associated with operating a mutual fund. | ||
3 | Source: Lipper Inc. |
The Fund 5
FUND PERFORMANCE
Comparison of change in value of $10,000 investment in Dreyfus Premier Municipal Bond Fund Class A shares and Class B shares and the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index
† Source: Lipper Inc. |
Past performance is not predictive of future performance. |
The above graph compares a $10,000 investment made in Class A shares and Class B shares of Dreyfus Premier |
Municipal Bond Fund on 4/30/95 to a $10,000 investment made in the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index |
(the "Index") on that date.All dividends and capital gain distributions are reinvested. Performance for Class C and |
Class Z shares will vary from the performance of both Class A and Class B shares shown above due to differences in |
charges and expenses. |
The fund invests primarily in municipal securities and its performance shown in the line graph takes into account the |
maximum initial sales charge on Class A shares and all other applicable fees and expenses for Class A shares and |
Class B shares.The Index, unlike the fund, is an unmanaged total return performance benchmark for the long-term, |
investment-grade, tax-exempt bond market, calculated by using municipal bonds selected to be representative of the |
municipal market overall.The Index does not take into account charges, fees and other expenses which can contribute to |
the Index potentially outperforming or underperforming the fund. Further information relating to fund performance, |
including expense reimbursements, if applicable, is contained in the Financial Highlights section of the prospectus and |
elsewhere in this report. |
6 |
Actual Aggregate Total Returns as of 4/30/05 | ||||||||||
Inception | From | |||||||||
Date | 1 Year | 5 Years | 10 Years | Inception | ||||||
Class Z shares | 10/13/04 | — | — | — | 2.71% |
Average Annual Total Returns as of 4/30/05 | ||||||||||
Inception | From | |||||||||
Date | 1 Year | 5 Years | 10 Years | Inception | ||||||
Class A shares | ||||||||||
with maximum sales charge (4.5%) | 2.38% | 4.61% | 4.60% | |||||||
without sales charge | 7.18% | 5.58% | 5.08% | |||||||
Class B shares | ||||||||||
with applicable redemption charge † | 2.64% | 4.72% | 4.76% | |||||||
without redemption | 6.64% | 5.05% | 4.76% | |||||||
Class C shares | ||||||||||
with applicable redemption charge †† | 7/13/95 | 5.40% | 4.80% | — | 3.97% | |||||
without redemption | 7/13/95 | 6.40% | 4.80% | — | 3.97% |
Past performance is not predictive of future performance.The fund's performance shown in the graph and table does not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Performance for Class B shares assumes the conversion of Class B shares to Class A shares at the end of the sixth year following the date of purchase.
† | The maximum contingent deferred sales charge for Class B shares is 4%.After six years Class B shares convert to | |
Class A shares. | ||
†† | The maximum contingent deferred sales charge for Class C shares is 1% for shares redeemed within one year of the | |
date of purchase. |
The Fund 7
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND'S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemption fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund's prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund's expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in Dreyfus Premier Municipal Bond Fund from November 1, 2004 to April 30, 2005. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||||
assuming actual returns for the six months ended April 30, 2005 | ||||||||
Class A | Class B | Class C | Class Z | |||||
Expenses paid per $1,000 † | $ 4.61 | $ 7.11 | $ 8.20 | $ 4.36 | ||||
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,020.70 | $1,018.20 | $1,017.00 | $1,021.00 |
COMPARING YOUR FUND'S EXPENSES WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) |
Using the SEC's method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund's expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return. You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds.All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | ||||||||
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended April 30, 2005 | ||||||||
Class A | Class B | Class C | Class Z | |||||
Expenses paid per $1,000 † | $ 4.61 | $ 7.10 | $ 8.20 | $ 4.36 | ||||
Ending value (after expenses) | $1,020.23 | $1,017.75 | $1,016.66 | $1,020.48 |
† Expenses are equal to the fund's annualized expense ratio of .92% for Class A, 1.42% for Class B, 1.64% for Class C and .87% for Class Z, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period).
8 |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS April 30, 2005 |
Principal | ||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments—97.6% | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||
Alabama—2.0% | ||||
Jefferson County, Limited Obligation | ||||
School Warrants 5.25%, 1/1/2020 | 5,000,000 | 5,385,550 | ||
Jefferson County, Sewer Revenue (Capital | ||||
Improvement Warrants) 5.125%, 2/1/2039 | ||||
(Insured; FGIC) (Prerefunded 2/1/2009) | 4,000,000 a | 4,329,720 | ||
University of Alabama, HR | ||||
5.75%, 9/1/2020 (Insured; MBIA) | 3,000,000 | 3,315,510 | ||
Arizona—.4% | ||||
Arizona School Facilities Board, Revenue | ||||
(State School Improvement) 5.25%, 7/1/2020 | 2,500,000 | 2,730,500 | ||
Arkansas—1.2% | ||||
Independence County, PCR | ||||
(Entergy Arkansas Inc.) | ||||
5%, 1/1/2021 | 3,000,000 | 3,050,340 | ||
Lake Hamilton, School District Number 005 | ||||
(Capital Improvement) 5.50%, 4/1/2029 | ||||
(Insured; AMBAC) | 4,600,000 | 4,850,700 | ||
California—11.1% | ||||
California: | ||||
5.625%, 5/1/2018 | 5,550,000 | 6,125,813 | ||
5.625%, 5/1/2020 | 5,715,000 | 6,307,931 | ||
California Department of Water Resources, | ||||
Power Supply Revenue: | ||||
6%, 5/1/2015 | 6,000,000 | 6,913,260 | ||
5.375%, 5/1/2018 (Insured; AMBAC) | 5,280,000 | 5,867,400 | ||
California Economic Recovery 5%, 7/1/2017 | 5,000,000 | 5,374,050 | ||
California Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue | ||||
(University of Southern California) | ||||
5%, 10/1/2033 | 8,000,000 | 8,364,160 | ||
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, PCR | ||||
8.604%, 6/1/2014 | 6,355,000 b,c | 8,535,718 | ||
California Public Works Board, LR | ||||
(Dept. of Corrections—Corcoran II) | ||||
5.50%, 1/1/2017 (Insured; AMBAC) | 5,000,000 | 5,188,400 | ||
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor | ||||
Agency, Toll Road Revenue | ||||
6%, 1/1/2034 (Prerefunded 1/1/2007) | 5,000,000 a | 5,265,700 | ||
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., | ||||
Tobacco Settlement Revenue (Asset Backed): | ||||
7.875%, 6/1/2042 | 1,000,000 | 1,160,050 | ||
7.90%, 6/1/2042 (LOC; Bank of New York) | 1,500,000 | 1,742,505 |
The Fund 9
S T A T E M E N T O F I N V E S T M E N T S (continued)
Principal | ||||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
California (continued) | ||||||
Lincoln, Special Tax (Community Facilities | ||||||
District Number 2003-1) 6%, 9/1/2034 | 3,500,000 | 3,632,090 | ||||
Los Angeles Unified School District | ||||||
5.25%, 7/1/2020 (Insured; FSA) | 4,000,000 | 4,427,640 | ||||
Port Oakland, Revenue 5.50%, 11/1/2020 (Insured; FGIC) | 4,085,000 | 4,434,798 | ||||
Colorado—7.2% | ||||||
Arapahoe County Capital Improvement Trust Fund, | ||||||
Highway Revenue (E-470 Project): | ||||||
Zero Coupon, 8/31/2005 | 2,530,000 | 2,508,672 | ||||
Zero Coupon, 8/31/2007 (Prerefunded 8/31/2005) | 4,000,000 | a | 3,539,520 | |||
7%, 8/31/2026 (Prerefunded 8/31/2005) | 11,000,000 | a | 11,491,260 | |||
Broomfield City and County, COP | ||||||
(Open Space Park and Recreation Facilities) | ||||||
5.50%, 12/1/2020 (Insured; AMBAC) | 1,000,000 | 1,094,320 | ||||
Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority, | ||||||
LR (Community Colleges of Colorado) | ||||||
5.50%, 12/1/2021 (Insured; AMBAC) | 1,100,000 | 1,217,513 | ||||
Colorado Housing Finance Authority, | ||||||
7.15%, 10/1/2030 (Insured; FHA) | 115,000 | 120,962 | ||||
Denver City and County, Airport Revenue | ||||||
6%, 11/15/2017 (Insured; AMBAC) | 5,000,000 | 5,541,200 | ||||
E-470 Public Highway Authority, Revenue | ||||||
5.75%, 9/1/2035 (Insured; MBIA) | 5,500,000 | 6,160,330 | ||||
Lakewood, MFHR (Insured Mortgage Loan) | ||||||
6.70%, 10/1/2036 (Insured; FHA) | 5,000,000 | 5,129,050 | ||||
Northwest Parkway Public Highway Authority, Revenue: | ||||||
Zero Coupon, 6/15/2027 (Insured; AMBAC) | 6,125,000 | 1,779,190 | ||||
7.125%, 6/15/2041 | 8,250,000 | 8,918,003 | ||||
Connecticut—4.2% | ||||||
Connecticut: | ||||||
8.363%, 6/15/2011 | 4,000,000 | b,c | 4,938,920 | |||
7.863%, 12/15/2015 | 3,700,000 | b,c | 4,858,544 | |||
Connecticut Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | ||||||
Revenue: | ||||||
(Saint Francis Hospital & Medical Center) | ||||||
5.50%, 7/1/2017 (Insured; Radian) | 4,040,000 | 4,450,100 | ||||
(University of Hartford) 5.625%, 7/1/2026 | ||||||
(Insured; Radian) | 4,345,000 | 4,716,193 | ||||
Mashantucket Western Pequot Tribe, | ||||||
Special Revenue 5.75%, 9/1/2027 | 8,000,000 | c | 8,267,040 |
10
Principal | ||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||
District of Columbia—1.0% | ||||
Washington Convention Center Authority, | ||||
Dedicated Tax Revenue (Senior Lien) | ||||
5%, 10/1/2021 (Insured; AMBAC) | 6,500,000 | 6,867,250 | ||
Florida—.9% | ||||
Highlands County Health Facilities Authority, Revenue | ||||
(Adventist/Sunbelt) 6%, 11/15/2031 | 2,500,000 | 2,709,350 | ||
Jacksonville Electric Authority, Revenue | ||||
5.50%, 10/1/2030 (Prerefunded 10/1/2005) | 3,385,000 a | 3,426,771 | ||
Georgia—1.9% | ||||
Atlanta and Fulton County Recreation Authority, | ||||
Revenue (Downtown Arena Public Improvement) | ||||
5.375%, 12/1/2026 (Insured; MBIA) | 2,180,000 | 2,306,178 | ||
College Park Business and Industrial Development | ||||
Authority, Revenue (Civic Center) | ||||
5.75%, 9/1/2026 (Insured; AMBAC) | 4,250,000 | 4,760,255 | ||
Georgia 5.25%, 7/1/2017 | 5,000,000 | 5,441,300 | ||
Illinois—2.7% | ||||
Carol Stream, First Mortgage Revenue | ||||
(Windsor Park Manor) 6.50%, 12/1/2007 | 1,115,000 | 1,171,040 | ||
Illinois Development Finance Authority, Revenue | ||||
(Community Rehabilitation Providers Facility): | ||||
8.75%, 3/1/2010 | 107,000 | 107,790 | ||
8.25%, 8/1/2012 | 1,365,000 | 1,282,076 | ||
Illinois Educational Facilities Authority, Revenues | ||||
(University of Chicago) | ||||
5.125%, 7/1/2038 (Insured; MBIA) | 5,000,000 | 5,186,950 | ||
Illinois Health Facilities Authority, Revenue | ||||
(Residential Centers Inc.) 8.50%, 8/15/2016 | 4,660,000 | 4,665,639 | ||
Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, | ||||
Dedicated State Tax Revenue (McCormick Place | ||||
Expansion) 5.50%, 6/15/2023 (Insured; MBIA) | 5,000,000 | 5,518,550 | ||
Kansas—1.7% | ||||
Wichita, HR (Via Christi Health System, Inc.): | ||||
6.25%, 11/15/2019 | 2,000,000 | 2,238,540 | ||
6.25%, 11/15/2020 | 3,000,000 | 3,357,810 | ||
Wyandotte County Kansas City | ||||
Unified Government, Utility Systems Revenue | ||||
5.65%, 9/1/2022 (Insured; AMBAC) | 5,000,000 | 5,827,350 |
The Fund 11
S T A T E M E N T O F I N V E S T M E N T S (continued)
Principal | ||||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
Kentucky—2.1% | ||||||
Mount Sterling, LR (Kentucky League | ||||||
of Cities Funding) 6.10%, 3/1/2018 | 5,500,000 | 6,529,160 | ||||
Pendleton County, Multi-County LR (Kentucky Association | ||||||
of Counties Leasing Trust Program) 6.40%, 3/1/2019 | 6,000,000 | 7,323,900 | ||||
Louisiana—.2% | ||||||
Saint James Parish, SWDR (Freeport-McMoran | ||||||
Partnership) 7.70%, 10/1/2022 | 1,000,000 | 1,001,750 | ||||
Maryland—.3% | ||||||
Maryland Energy Financing Administration, SWDR | ||||||
(Wheelabrator Water) 6.45%, 12/1/2016 | 2,100,000 | 2,205,945 | ||||
Massachusetts—3.7% | ||||||
Massachusetts Consolidated Loan 5%, 3/1/2016 | 5,750,000 | 6,259,968 | ||||
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities | ||||||
Authority, Revenue (Harvard Pilgrim Health) | ||||||
5%, 7/1/2014 (Insured; FSA) | 4,500,000 | 4,698,270 | ||||
Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, Revenue: | ||||||
Health Care Facility (Metro Health | ||||||
Foundation, Inc.) 6.75%, 12/1/2027 | 7,900,000 | 7,702,184 | ||||
Water Treatment (American Hingham) | ||||||
6.95%, 12/1/2035 | 2,450,000 | 2,592,321 | ||||
Route 3 North Transportation Improvement | ||||||
Association, LR 5.75%, 6/15/2017 (Insured; MBIA) | 3,000,000 | 3,331,590 | ||||
Michigan—7.0% | ||||||
Dearborn Economic Development Corp., | ||||||
HR (Oakwood Obligation Group) | ||||||
5.875%, 11/15/2025 (Insured; FGIC) | 4,950,000 | 5,118,548 | ||||
Michigan Building Authority, Revenue | ||||||
(Residual Certificates) 7.790%, 10/15/2017 | 5,000,000 | b,c | 6,088,550 | |||
Michigan Hospital Finance Authority: | ||||||
HR (Genesys Health Systems): | ||||||
8.10%, 10/1/2013 (Prerefunded 10/1/2005) | 2,000,000 | a | 2,084,440 | |||
8.125%, 10/1/2021 (Prerefunded 10/1/2005) | 4,910,000 | a | 5,117,791 | |||
7.50%, 10/1/2027 (Prerefunded 10/1/2005) | 8,000,000 | a | 8,160,320 | |||
Revenue 7.593%, 11/15/2007 | 3,225,000 | b,c | 3,556,691 | |||
Michigan Strategic Fund, SWDR (Genesee | ||||||
Power Station) 7.50%, 1/1/2021 | 6,900,000 | 6,550,791 | ||||
Pontiac Tax Increment Finance Authority, | ||||||
Tax Increment Revenue (Development Area | ||||||
Number 3) 6.25%, 6/1/2022 | 3,250,000 | 3,279,510 | ||||
Romulus Economic Development Corp., EDR | ||||||
(HIR Limited Partnership) 7%, 11/1/2015 | 5,000,000 | 6,205,850 |
12
Principal | ||||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
Minnesota—1.6% | ||||||
Chaska, Electric Revenue 6%, 10/1/2025 | ||||||
(Prerefunded 10/1/2010) | 2,000,000 | a | 2,275,080 | |||
Minneapolis, Health Care System Revenue (Fairview | ||||||
Health Services) 5%, 11/15/2034 (Insured; AMBAC) | 7,000,000 | d | 7,345,100 | |||
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, | ||||||
Single Family Mortgage 5.95%, 1/1/2017 | 750,000 | 764,235 | ||||
Missouri—2.1% | ||||||
Missouri Development Finance Board, | ||||||
Infrastructure Facilities Revenue (Branson) | ||||||
5.375%, 12/1/2027 | 2,470,000 | 2,585,720 | ||||
Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority: | ||||||
Educational Facilities Revenue (Washington | ||||||
University) 5%, 2/15/2033 | 5,000,000 | 5,237,850 | ||||
Health Facilities Revenue (Saint Anthony's | ||||||
Medical Center) 6.125%, 12/1/2019 | 4,000,000 | 4,329,680 | ||||
Missouri Housing Development Commission, SFMR | ||||||
(Homeowner Loan) 6.30%, 9/1/2025 | ||||||
(Collateralized; FNMA & GNMA) | 210,000 | 220,855 | ||||
Saint Louis Industrial Development Authority, Revenue | ||||||
(Saint Louis Convention) 7.20%, 12/15/2028 | 1,685,000 | 1,284,307 | ||||
New Jersey—5.7% | ||||||
Hudson County, COP (Correctional Facility) | ||||||
5%, 12/1/2021 (Insured; MBIA) | 4,000,000 | 4,288,000 | ||||
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Revenue: | ||||||
7.353%, 6/1/2015 (Insured; AMBAC) | 2,495,000 | b,c | 3,048,790 | |||
7.353%, 6/15/2016 (Insured; AMBAC) | 2,495,000 | b,c | 3,048,790 | |||
(School Facilities—Construction 2001): | ||||||
5.25%, 6/15/2015 (Insured; AMBAC) | ||||||
(Prerefunded 6/15/2011) | 10,000 | a | 11,110 | |||
5.25%, 6/15/2016 (Insured; AMBAC) | ||||||
(Prerefunded 6/15/2011) | 10,000 | a | 11,110 | |||
New Jersey Turnpike Authority, Turnpike Revenue: | ||||||
8.843%, 1/1/2011 (Insured; MBIA) | 6,350,000 | b,c | 8,148,764 | |||
5.50%, 1/1/2030 (Insured; MBIA) | 6,000,000 | 6,472,500 | ||||
5%, 1/1/2035 (Insured; AMBAC) | 3,000,000 | 3,111,390 | ||||
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.: | ||||||
7%, 6/1/2041 | 4,000,000 | 4,326,240 | ||||
(Asset Backed) 5.75%, 6/1/2032 | 5,000,000 | 4,996,300 | ||||
New Mexico—1.0% | ||||||
Farmington, PCR | ||||||
(Public Service Co.—San Juan) 6.375%, 4/1/2022 | 1,430,000 | 1,541,912 | ||||
Jicarilla Apache Nation, Revenue 5.50%, 9/1/2023 | 5,000,000 | 5,367,650 |
The Fund 13
S T A T E M E N T O F I N V E S T M E N T S (continued)
Principal | ||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||
New York—4.2% | ||||
New York City 5.50%, 3/15/2015 | 3,500,000 | 3,816,505 | ||
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, | ||||
Water & Sewer Systems Revenue: | ||||
6%, 6/15/2033 (Prerefunded 6/15/2010) | 3,085,000 a | 3,544,078 | ||
5%, 6/15/2037 | 5,000,000 | 5,225,750 | ||
New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenues: | ||||
(New York University) 6%, 7/1/2017 (Insured; MBIA) | 3,500,000 | 4,238,885 | ||
(Rochester Institute of Technology) | ||||
5.25%, 7/1/2024 (Insured; AMBAC) | 3,345,000 | 3,591,426 | ||
(State University Educational Facilities) | ||||
7.50%, 5/15/2013 | 2,500,000 | 3,166,675 | ||
New York State Thruway Authority, General Revenue | ||||
5%, 1/1/2030 (Insured; AMBAC) | 4,000,000 | 4,217,800 | ||
North Carolina—2.1% | ||||
North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, | ||||
Power Systems Revenue: | ||||
7%, 1/1/2013 | 3,500,000 | 4,083,100 | ||
6.75%, 1/1/2026 (Insured; ACA) | 5,000,000 | 5,591,250 | ||
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Revenue | ||||
(Housing Foundation Inc.): | ||||
6.45%, 8/15/2020 (Insured; ACA) | 1,000,000 | 1,108,680 | ||
6.625%, 8/15/2030 (Insured; ACA) | 2,565,000 | 2,816,190 | ||
Ohio—6.4% | ||||
Cincinnati, Water Systems Revenue: | ||||
5%, 12/1/2020 | 2,420,000 | 2,568,346 | ||
5%, 12/1/2021 | 3,825,000 | 4,059,473 | ||
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, Revenue | ||||
(Special Assessment/Tax Increment) 7.35%, 12/1/2031 | 3,000,000 | 3,254,760 | ||
Columbus City School District, School Facilities Construction | ||||
and Improvement 5%, 12/1/2032 (Insured; FSA) | 5,000,000 | 5,266,450 | ||
Cuyahoga County: | ||||
Hospital Facilities Revenue (UHHS/CSAHS Cuyahoga Inc. | ||||
& CSAHS/UHHS Canton Inc.) 7.50%, 1/1/2030 | 7,000,000 | 7,873,040 | ||
HR (Metrohealth Systems) 6.15%, 2/15/2029 | 3,115,000 | 3,260,315 | ||
Hamilton County, Sales Tax | ||||
Zero Coupon, 12/1/2025 (Insured; AMBAC) | 14,865,000 | 5,711,728 | ||
Mahoning County, Hospital Facilities Revenue | ||||
(Forum Health Obligation Group) 6%, 11/15/2032 | 2,500,000 | 2,686,525 | ||
Ohio Water Development Authority, Pollution Control | ||||
Facilities Revenue (Cleveland Electric) | ||||
6.10%, 8/1/2020 (Insured; ACA) | 7,300,000 | 7,667,701 |
14
Principal | ||||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
Oklahoma—2.1% | ||||||
Holdenville Industrial Authority, | ||||||
Correctional Facility Revenue: | ||||||
6.60%, 7/1/2010 (Prerefunded 7/1/2006) | 2,045,000 | a | 2,175,573 | |||
6.70%, 7/1/2015 (Prerefunded 7/1/2006) | 4,625,000 | a | 4,925,625 | |||
McGee Creek Authority, Water Revenue | ||||||
6%, 1/1/2013 (Insured; MBIA) | 6,025,000 | 6,836,568 | ||||
Oregon—.6% | ||||||
Portland, Sewer Systems Revenue | ||||||
5.75%, 8/1/2019 (Insured; FGIC) | 3,500,000 | 3,903,655 | ||||
Pennsylvania—4.0% | ||||||
Allegheny County Sanitation Authority, | ||||||
Sewer Revenue 5.375%, 12/1/2024 | ||||||
(Insured; MBIA) (Prerefunded 12/1/2007) | 13,700,000 | a | 14,757,229 | |||
Butler County Industrial Development Authority, | ||||||
Health Care Facilities Revenue (Saint John Care | ||||||
Center) 5.85%, 4/20/2036 (Collateralized; GNMA) | 4,210,000 | 4,542,169 | ||||
Montgomery County Higher Education and Health | ||||||
Authority, Revenue (First Mortgage—AHF/ | ||||||
Montgomery, Inc.) 10.50%, 9/1/2020 | 3,145,000 | 3,169,059 | ||||
Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, | ||||||
Mortgage Revenue (Whitemarsh Continuing Care) | ||||||
6.125%, 2/1/2028 | 1,500,000 | 1,533,195 | ||||
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, | ||||||
Exempt Facilities Revenue (Reliant Energy) | ||||||
6.75%, 12/1/2036 | 2,000,000 | 2,157,020 | ||||
Rhode Island—1.0% | ||||||
Providence, Special Tax Increment Obligation | ||||||
6.65%, 6/1/2016 | 4,000,000 | 4,146,120 | ||||
Rhode Island Health and Educational Building | ||||||
Corp., Revenue (Higher Education Facility) | ||||||
5.50%, 9/15/2024 (Insured; AMBAC) | 2,000,000 | 2,222,660 | ||||
Rhode Island Housing and Mortgage Finance Corp. | ||||||
(Homeownership Opportunity) 7.55%, 10/1/2022 | 355,000 | 355,415 | ||||
South Carolina—2.8% | ||||||
Greenville County School District, Installment | ||||||
Purchase Revenue (Building Equity | ||||||
Sooner Tomorrow) 5.50%, 12/1/2028 | 12,900,000 | 13,976,634 | ||||
Greenville Hospital System, | ||||||
Hospital Facilities Revenue | ||||||
5.50%, 5/1/2026 (Insured; AMBAC) | 4,385,000 | 4,804,513 |
The Fund 15
S T A T E M E N T O F I N V E S T M E N T S (continued)
Principal | ||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||
Tennessee—1.5% | ||||
Memphis Center Revenue Finance Corp., | ||||
Sports Facility Revenue (Memphis Redbirds) | ||||
6.50%, 9/1/2028 | 8,000,000 | 8,119,200 | ||
Shelby County Health Educational and Housing | ||||
Facilities Board, MFHR (Cameron) | ||||
7.25%, 7/1/2023 | 2,755,000 | 1,796,590 | ||
Texas—4.2% | ||||
Alliance Airport Authority, | ||||
Special Facilities Revenue | ||||
(Federal Express Corp.) 6.375%, 4/1/2021 | 5,040,000 | 5,283,432 | ||
Austin Convention Enterprises Inc., | ||||
Hotel Revenue (Convention Center): | ||||
6.70%, 1/1/2028 | 5,000,000 | 5,358,800 | ||
5.75%, 1/1/2032 | 855,000 | 884,814 | ||
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport: | ||||
Facility Improvement Corporation Revenue | ||||
(American Airlines Inc.) 7.25%, 11/1/2030 | 3,710,000 | 2,781,350 | ||
Joint Revenue 5.50%, 11/1/2021 | ||||
(Insured; FSA) | 3,000,000 | 3,257,520 | ||
Sabine River Authority, PCR | ||||
(TXU Energy Company LLC) | ||||
6.15%, 8/1/2022 | 2,995,000 | 3,294,799 | ||
Texas Turnpike Authority, | ||||
Central Texas Turnpike System Revenue | ||||
5.75%, 8/15/2038 (Insured; AMBAC) | 3,500,000 | 3,921,575 | ||
Wichita Falls, Water and Sewer Revenue | ||||
5.375%, 8/1/2024 (Insured; AMBAC) | 3,000,000 | 3,255,480 | ||
Utah—1.3% | ||||
Carbon County, SWDR (Sunnyside | ||||
Cogeneration-A) 7.10%, 8/15/2023 | 8,649,000 | 8,610,080 | ||
Virginia—.8% | ||||
Isle Wight County Industrial Development Authority, | ||||
Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Revenue | ||||
(Union Camp Corporation) 6.55%, 4/1/2024 | 3,000,000 | 3,040,170 | ||
West Point Industrial Development Authority, | ||||
SWDR (Chesapeake Corp.) 6.375%, 3/1/2019 | 2,000,000 | 2,016,660 |
16 |
Principal | ||||
Long-Term Municipal Investments (continued) | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||
Washington—2.0% | ||||
Washington Public Power Supply System, Revenue | ||||
(Nuclear Project Number 3) | ||||
7.125%, 7/1/2016 (Insured; MBIA) | 10,425,000 | 13,369,020 | ||
West Virginia—1.4% | ||||
Upshur County, SWDR (TJ International) | ||||
7%, 7/15/2025 | 3,500,000 | 3,609,375 | ||
West Virginia, State Road | ||||
5.75%, 6/1/2025 (Insured; MBIA) | 2,500,000 | 2,768,675 | ||
West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, HR | ||||
(Charleston Area Medical Center) | ||||
6%, 9/1/2012 (Prerefunded 9/1/2010) | 2,440,000 a | 2,767,350 | ||
Wisconsin—3.1% | ||||
Badger Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp., | ||||
Tobacco Settlement Revenue | ||||
7%, 6/1/2028 | 13,350,000 | 14,442,431 | ||
Wisconsin Health and Educational | ||||
Facilities Authority, Revenue | ||||
(Aurora Health Care) 6.40%, 4/15/2033 | 5,500,000 | 6,060,010 | ||
Wyoming—.4% | ||||
Wyoming Student Loan Corp., Student | ||||
Loan Revenue 6.25%, 6/1/2029 | 2,500,000 | 2,684,825 | ||
U.S. Related—1.7% | ||||
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico: | ||||
5.65%, 7/1/2015 (Insured; MBIA) | 4,000,000 | 4,659,320 | ||
Public Improvement 5.25%, 7/1/2013 | ||||
(Insured; MBIA) | 6,000,000 | 6,792,780 | ||
Total Long-Term Municipal Investments | ||||
(cost $604,856,821) | 644,850,831 | |||
Face Amount | ||||
Covered by | ||||
Options—.0% | Contracts ($) | Value ($) | ||
U.S. Treasury 10 Year Notes | ||||
June 2005 @ 107 | ||||
(cost $149,938) | 500,000 | 7,813 |
The Fund 17
S T A T E M E N T O F I N V E S T M E N T S (continued)
Principal | ||||||
Short-Term Municipal Investments—1.8% | Amount ($) | Value ($) | ||||
Pennsylvania—1.0% | ||||||
Philadelphia Hospitals and Higher Education | ||||||
Facilities Authority, Revenue, VRDN | ||||||
(Children's Hospital) 3.05% (Insured; MBIA) | 1,000,000 | e | 1,000,000 | |||
Schuylkill County Industrial Development Authority, | ||||||
RRR, VRDN (Northeastern Power Co.) | ||||||
3.05% (LOC; Dexia Credit Locale de France) | 5,495,000 | e | 5,495,000 | |||
Texas—.8% | ||||||
Bell County Health Facilities Development | ||||||
Corp., Revenue, VRDN (Scott and White Memorial Hospital) | ||||||
3.05% (Insured; MBIA) | 3,000,000 | e | 3,000,000 | |||
Texas Water Development Board, Revenue, VRDN | ||||||
(State Revolving Fund) 2.86% | 2,000,000 | e | 2,000,000 | |||
Total Short-Term Municipal Investments | ||||||
(cost $11,495,000) | 11,495,000 | |||||
Total Investments (cost $616,501,759) | 99.4% | 656,353,644 | ||||
Cash and Receivables (Net) | .6% | 3,810,153 | ||||
Net Assets | 100.0% | 660,163,797 |
18 |
Summary of Abbreviations | ||||||
ACA | American Capital Access | HR | Hospital Revenue | |||
AMBAC | American Municipal Bond | LOC | Letter of Credit | |||
Assurance Corporation | LR | Lease Revenue | ||||
COP | Certificate of Participation | MBIA | Municipal Bond Investors | |||
EDR | Economic Development Revenue | Assurance | ||||
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance | Insurance Corporation | ||||
Company | MFHR | Multi-Family Housing Revenue | ||||
FHA | Federal Housing Administration | PCR | Pollution Control Revenue | |||
FNMA | Federal National Mortgage | RRR | Resources Recovery Revenue | |||
Association | SFMR | Single Family Mortgage Revenue | ||||
FSA | Financial Security Assurance | SWDR | Solid Waste Disposal Revenue | |||
GNMA | Government National | VRDN | Variable Rate Demand Notes | |||
Mortgage Association |
Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited) | ||||||||||
Fitch | or | Moody's | or | Standard & Poor's | Value (%)† | |||||
AAA | AAA | AAA | 46.2 | |||||||
AA | Aa | AA | 15.6 | |||||||
A | A | A | 13.3 | |||||||
BBB | Baa | BBB | 11.7 | |||||||
BB | Ba | BB | 1.7 | |||||||
B | B | B | .5 | |||||||
CCC | Caa | CCC | .4 | |||||||
F-1, F-1+ | VMIG1, MIG1, P1 | SP1, A1 | 1.6 | |||||||
Not Rated f | Not Rated f | Not Rated f | 9.0 | |||||||
100.0 |
† | Based on total investments. | |
a | Bonds which are prerefunded are collateralized by U.S. Government securities which are held in escrow and are used | |
to pay principal and interest on the municipal issue and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date. | ||
b | Inverse floater security—the interest rate is subject to change periodically. | |
c | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold | |
in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At April 30, 2005, these | ||
securities amounted to $50,491,808 or 7.6% of net assets. | ||
d | Purchased on a delayed delivery basis. | |
e | Securities payable on demand.Variable interest rate—subject to periodic change. | |
f | Securities which, while not rated by Fitch, Moody's and Standard & Poor's, have been determined by the Manager to | |
be of comparable quality to those rated securities in which the fund may invest. | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 19
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL FUTURES April 30, 2005 |
Market Value | Unrealized | |||||||
Covered by | (Depreciation) | |||||||
Contracts | Contracts ($) | Expiration | at 4/30/2005 ($) | |||||
Financial Futures Short | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10 Year Notes | 50 | 5,571,094 | June 2005 | (107,181) |
See notes to financial statements.
20 |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES April 30, 2005 |
Cost | Value | |||
Assets ($): | ||||
Investments in securities—See Statement of Investments | 616,501,759 | 656,353,644 | ||
Cash on Initial Margin—Note 4 | 37,685 | |||
Interest receivable | 10,730,328 | |||
Receivable for investment securities purchased | 7,960,520 | |||
Receivable for shares of Beneficial Interest subscribed | 118,752 | |||
Receivable for futures variation margin—Note 4 | 12,000 | |||
Prepaid expenses | 45,383 | |||
675,258,312 | ||||
Liabilities ($): | ||||
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 3(c) | 420,493 | |||
Cash overdraft due to custodian | 935,482 | |||
Payable for investment securities purchased | 13,271,059 | |||
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | 290,506 | |||
Accrued expenses | 176,975 | |||
15,094,515 | ||||
Net Assets ($) | 660,163,797 | |||
Composition of Net Assets ($): | ||||
Paid-in capital | 691,752,439 | |||
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (71,333,346) | |||
Accumulated net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments [including ($107,181) | ||||
net unrealized (depreciation) on financial futures] | 39,744,704 | |||
Net Assets ($) | 660,163,797 |
Net Asset Value Per Share | ||||||||
Class A | Class B | Class C | Class Z | |||||
Net Assets ($) | 279,612,042 | 21,191,757 | 9,157,577 | 350,202,421 | ||||
Shares outstanding | 21,314,494 | 1,614,744 | 697,026 | 26,693,866 | ||||
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 13.12 | 13.12 | 13.14 | 13.12 |
See notes to financial statements.
The Fund 21
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS Year Ended April 30, 2005 |
Investment Income ($): | ||
Interest Income | 27,912,765 | |
Expenses: | ||
Management fee—Note 3(a) | 2,831,659 | |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 3(c) | 1,567,359 | |
Distribution fees—Note 3(b) | 196,835 | |
Registration fees | 92,208 | |
Custodian fees | 58,470 | |
Professional fees | 49,661 | |
Prospectus and shareholders' reports | 16,766 | |
Trustees' fees and expenses—Note 3(d) | 14,456 | |
Loan commitment fees—Note 2 | 3,607 | |
Miscellaneous | 38,290 | |
Total Expenses | 4,869,311 | |
Less—reduction in expenses due to undertaking—Note 3(a) | (16,721) | |
Less—reduction in custody fees | ||
due to earnings credits—Note 1(b) | (10,687) | |
Net Expenses | 4,841,903 | |
Investment Income-Net | 23,070,862 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments—Note 4 ($): | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 5,283,636 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on options transactions | (9,456) | |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) | 5,274,180 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on | ||
investments including ($107,181) net unrealized | ||
(depreciation) on financial futures] | 3,186,442 | |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments | 8,460,622 | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 31,531,484 |
See notes to financial statements.
22 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
Year Ended April 30, | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
Operations ($): | ||||
Investment income—net | 23,070,862 | 16,261,005 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 5,274,180 | (4,489,664) | ||
Net unrealized appreciation | ||||
(depreciation) on investments | 3,186,442 | (1,575,929) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | ||||
Resulting from Operations | 31,531,484 | 10,195,412 | ||
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | ||||
Investment income—net: | ||||
Class A shares | (13,068,198) | (14,256,130) | ||
Class B shares | (992,193) | (1,447,639) | ||
Class C shares | (379,857) | (460,325) | ||
Class Z shares | (8,690,419) | — | ||
Total Dividends | (23,130,667) | (16,164,094) | ||
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($): | ||||
Net proceeds from shares sold: | ||||
Class A shares | 15,995,280 | 35,607,537 | ||
Class B shares | 1,201,970 | 3,753,629 | ||
Class C shares | 818,911 | 2,247,684 | ||
Class Z shares | 8,745,394 | — | ||
Net assets received in connection | ||||
with reorganization—Note 1 | 360,805,920 | — | ||
Dividends reinvested: | ||||
Class A shares | 8,094,642 | 8,431,974 | ||
Class B shares | 551,772 | 778,442 | ||
Class C shares | 225,496 | 269,128 | ||
Class Z shares | 5,759,846 | — | ||
Cost of shares redeemed: | ||||
Class A shares | (44,366,426) | (67,691,212) | ||
Class B shares | (10,620,323) | (17,546,005) | ||
Class C shares | (3,373,864) | (4,354,852) | ||
Class Z shares | (25,890,773) | — | ||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | ||||
Beneficial Interest Transactions | 317,947,845 | (38,503,675) | ||
Total Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | 326,348,662 | (44,472,357) | ||
Net Assets ($): | ||||
Beginning of Period | 333,815,135 | 378,287,492 | ||
End of Period | 660,163,797 | 333,815,135 | ||
Undistributed investment income—net | — | 66,772 |
The Fund 23
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
Year Ended April 30, | ||||
2005 | 2004 | |||
Capital Share Transactions: | ||||
Class Aa | ||||
Shares sold | 1,238,023 | 2,738,676 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 622,551 | 646,297 | ||
Shares redeemed | (3,422,128) | (5,188,582) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (1,561,554) | (1,803,609) | ||
Class B a | ||||
Shares sold | 92,084 | 288,217 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 42,468 | 59,645 | ||
Shares redeemed | (819,430) | (1,345,398) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (684,878) | (997,536) | ||
Class C | ||||
Shares sold | 63,516 | 171,637 | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 17,324 | 20,596 | ||
Shares redeemed | (261,444) | (334,897) | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (180,604) | (142,664) | ||
Class Z | ||||
Shares sold | 666,944 | — | ||
Shares issued in connection | ||||
with reorganization—Note 1 | 27,563,477 | — | ||
Shares issued for dividends reinvested | 439,945 | — | ||
Shares redeemed | (1,976,500) | — | ||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 26,693,866 | — |
a | During the period ended April 30, 2005, 352,639 Class B shares representing $4,574,649 were automatically | |
converted to 352,748 Class A shares and during the period ended April 30, 2004, 413,589 Class B shares | ||
representing $5,398,765 were automatically converted to 413,719 Class A shares. | ||
See notes to financial statements. |
24
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following tables describe the performance for each share class for the fiscal periods indicated. All information (except portfolio turnover rate) reflects financial results for a single fund share.Total return shows how much your investment in the fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the fund's financial statements.
Year Ended April 30, | ||||||||||
Class A Shares | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 a | 2001 | |||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 12.81 | 13.04 | 12.99 | 13.14 | 12.75 | |||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||
Investment income—net | .59b | .60b | .65b | .68b | .66 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | .31 | (.24) | .04 | (.15) | .39 | |||||
Total from Investment Operations | .90 | .36 | .69 | .53 | 1.05 | |||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.59) | (.59) | (.64) | (.68) | (.66) | |||||
Net asset value, end of period | 13.12 | 12.81 | 13.04 | 12.99 | 13.14 | |||||
Total Return (%) c | 7.18 | 2.80 | 5.45 | 4.13 | 8.42 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .93 | .93 | .94 | .92 | .98 | |||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | .92 | .93 | .94 | .92 | .98 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 4.54 | 4.57 | 4.95 | 5.20 | 5.09 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 48.30 | 91.43 | 92.94 | 49.90 | 58.03 | |||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 279,612 | 293,083 | 321,936 | 361,701 | 349,345 |
a | As required, effective May 1, 2001, the fund has adopted the provisions of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide | |
for Investment Companies and began accreting discount or amortizing premium on a scientific basis for debt securities. | ||
The effect of this change for the period ended April 30, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share and | ||
decrease net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share by less than $.01 and increase the ratio of | ||
net investment income to average net assets from 5.19% to 5.20%. Per share data and ratios/supplemental data for | ||
periods prior to May 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation. | ||
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. | |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. | |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 25
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
Year Ended April 30, | ||||||||||
Class B Shares | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 a | 2001 | |||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 12.82 | 13.05 | 12.99 | 13.14 | 12.76 | |||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||
Investment income—net | .52b | .53b | .58b | .61b | .60 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | .31 | (.23) | .06 | (.15) | .38 | |||||
Total from Investment Operations | .83 | .30 | .64 | .46 | .98 | |||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.53) | (.53) | (.58) | (.61) | (.60) | |||||
Net asset value, end of period | 13.12 | 12.82 | 13.05 | 12.99 | 13.14 | |||||
Total Return (%) c | 6.64 | 2.20 | 5.00 | 3.60 | 7.93 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.43 | 1.49 | |||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.43 | 1.49 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 4.02 | 4.06 | 4.44 | 4.69 | 4.63 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 48.30 | 91.43 | 92.94 | 49.90 | 58.03 | |||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 21,192 | 29,471 | 43,022 | 43,092 | 47,026 |
a | As required, effective May 1, 2001, the fund has adopted the provisions of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide | |
for Investment Companies and began accreting discount or amortizing premium on a scientific basis for debt securities. | ||
The effect of this change for the period ended April 30, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share and | ||
decrease net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share by less than $.01 and increase the ratio of | ||
net investment income to average net assets from 4.68% to 4.69%. Per share data and ratios/supplemental data for | ||
periods prior to May 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation. | ||
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. | |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. | |
See notes to financial statements. |
26 |
Year Ended April 30, | ||||||||||
Class C Shares | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 a | 2001 | |||||
Per Share Data ($): | ||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 12.83 | 13.06 | 13.01 | 13.16 | 12.77 | |||||
Investment Operations: | ||||||||||
Investment income—net | .49b | .50b | .55b | .57b | .57 | |||||
Net realized and unrealized | ||||||||||
gain (loss) on investments | .32 | (.23) | .05 | (.14) | .39 | |||||
Total from Investment Operations | .81 | .27 | .60 | .43 | .96 | |||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.50) | (.50) | (.55) | (.58) | (.57) | |||||
Net asset value, end of period | 13.14 | 12.83 | 13.06 | 13.01 | 13.16 | |||||
Total Return (%) c | 6.40 | 2.06 | 4.67 | 3.35 | 7.63 | |||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||||||||||
Ratio of total expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.67 | 1.66 | 1.72 | |||||
Ratio of net expenses | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.67 | 1.66 | 1.72 | |||||
Ratio of net investment income | ||||||||||
to average net assets | 3.81 | 3.84 | 4.18 | 4.45 | 4.36 | |||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 48.30 | 91.43 | 92.94 | 49.90 | 58.03 | |||||
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 9,158 | 11,261 | 13,330 | 9,544 | 4,035 |
a | As required, effective May 1, 2001, the fund has adopted the provisions of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide | |
for Investment Companies and began accreting discount or amortizing premium on a scientific basis for debt securities. | ||
The effect of this change for the period ended April 30, 2002 was to increase net investment income per share and | ||
decrease net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments per share by less than $.01 and increase the ratio of | ||
net investment income to average net assets from 4.42% to 4.45%. Per share data and ratios/supplemental data for | ||
periods prior to May 1, 2001 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation. | ||
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. | |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. | |
See notes to financial statements. |
The Fund 27
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
Year Ended | ||
Class Z Shares | April 30, 2005 a | |
Per Share Data ($): | ||
Net asset value, beginning of period | 13.09 | |
Investment Operations: | ||
Investment income—net b | .32 | |
Net realized and unrealized | ||
gain (loss) on investments | .03 | |
Total from Investment Operations | .35 | |
Distributions: | ||
Dividends from investment income—net | (.32) | |
Net asset value, end of period | 13.12 | |
Total Return (%) c | 2.71d | |
Ratios/Supplemental Data (%): | ||
Ratio of total expenses to average net assets | .88e | |
Ratio of net expenses to average net assets | .86e | |
Ratio of net investment income | ||
to average net assets | 4.49e | |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 48.30 | |
Net Assets, end of period ($ x 1,000) | 350,202 |
a | From October 14, 2004 (commencement of initial offering) to April 30, 2005. | |
b | Based on average shares outstanding at each month end. | |
c | Exclusive of sales charge. | |
d | Not annualized. | |
e | Annualized. | |
See notes to financial statements. |
28
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Premier Municipal Bond Fund (the "fund") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Act"), as a diversified open-end management investment company. The fund's investment objective is to maximize current income exempt from federal income tax to the extent consistent with the preservation of capi-tal.The Dreyfus Corporation (the "Manager" or "Dreyfus") serves as the fund's investment adviser.The Manager is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mellon Bank, N.A, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mellon Financial Corporation ("Mellon Financial").
On April 6, 2004, the fund's Board of Trustees approved the addition of Class Z shares, which became effective on October 13, 2004.
As of the close of business on October 13, 2004, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization previously approved by the fund's Board of Trustees, all of the assets, subject to the liabilities, of General Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. were transferred to the fund. Shareholders of General Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. received Class Z shares of the fund, in an amount equal to the aggregate net asset value of their investment in General Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. at the time of the exchange.The net asset value of the fund's Class Z shares at the close of business on October 13,2004, after the reorganization, was $13.09 per share, and a total of 27,563,477 Class Z shares representing net assets of $360,805,920 (including $24,179,912 net unrealized appreciation on investments and accumulated net realized loss on investments of $35,835,484) were issued to General Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. shareholders in the exchange.The exchange was a tax-free event to shareholders.
Dreyfus Service Corporation (the "Distributor"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the fund's shares.The fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest in each of the following classes of shares: Class A, Class B, Class C and Class Z. Class A shares are subject to a sales charge
The Fund 29
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
imposed at the time of purchase. Class B shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge ("CDSC") imposed on Class B share redemptions made within six years of purchase and automatically convert to Class A shares after six years. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC imposed on Class C shares redeemed within one year of purchase. Class Z shares are sold at net asset value per share generally only to shareholders who received Class Z shares in exchange for their shares of General Municipal Bond Fund Inc. as a result of the reorganization of such fund. Class Z shares generally are not available for new accounts. Other differences between the classes include the services offered to and the expenses borne by each class and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
The fund's financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications. The fund's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown.The fund does not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued each business day by an independent pricing service (the "Service") approved by the Board of Trustees. Investments for which quoted bid prices are readily available and are representative of the bid side of the market in the judgment of the Service are valued at the mean between the quoted bid prices (as obtained by the Service from dealers in such securities) and asked prices (as calculated by the Service based upon its evaluation of the market for such securities). Other investments (which constitute a majority of the portfolio securities) are carried at fair value as determined by the Service, based on methods which include consideration of: yields or prices of municipal securities of
30
comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type; indications as to values from dealers; and general market conditions. Options and financial futures on municipal and U.S.Treasury securities are valued at the last sales price on the securities exchange on which such securities are primarily traded or at the last sales price on the national securities market on each business day.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income: Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gain and loss from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Securities purchased or sold on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis may be settled a month or more after the trade date.
The fund has an arrangement with the custodian bank whereby the fund receives earnings credits from the custodian when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset custody fees. For financial reporting purposes, the fund includes net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statement of Operations.
(c) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of the fund to declare dividends daily from investment income-net. Such dividends are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gain, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but the fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code").To the extent that net realized capital gain can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of the fund not to distribute such gain. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
(d) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of the fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, which can distribute tax exempt dividends, by complying with the applicable provisions of the
The Fund 31
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Code, and to make distributions of income and net realized capital gain sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
At April 30,2005,the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows: undistributed tax exempt income $218,959, accumulated capital losses $71,486,216 and unrealized appreciation $39,916,028.
The amount of this loss which can be utilized in subsequent years is subject to an annual limitation due to the fund's merger with General Municipal Bond Fund, Inc. If not applied, $9,421,592 of the carryover expires in fiscal 2007, $17,253,564 expires in fiscal 2008, $9,553,959 expires in fiscal 2009, $17,083,173 expires in fiscal 2010, $10,384,676 expires in fiscal 2011 and $7,789,252 expires in fiscal 2012.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders during the fiscal periods ended April 30, 2005 and April 30, 2004, were as follows: tax exempt income $23,130,667 and $16,164,094, respectively.
During the period April 30, 2005, as a result of permanent book to tax differences, primarily due to the tax treatment for amortization adjustments, the fund decreased accumulated undistributed investment income-net by $6,967, decreased accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments by $15,348 and increased paid-in capital by $22,315. Net assets were not affected by this reclassification.
NOTE 2—Bank Line of Credit:
The fund participates with other Dreyfus-managed funds in a $350 million redemption credit facility (the "Facility") to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes, including the financing of redemptions. In connection therewith, the fund has agreed to pay commitment fees on its pro rata portion of the Facility. Interest is charged to the fund based on prevailing market rates in effect at the time of borrowings. During the period ended April 30, 2005, the fund did not borrow under the Facility.
32
NOTE 3—Management Fee and Other Transactions With Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to a management agreement with the Manager, the management fee is computed at the annual rate of .55 of 1% of the value of the fund's average daily net assets and is payable monthly. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive receipt of its fees and/or assume the expenses of the fund's Class Z shares, until at least April 30, 2006, so that, the total annual operating expenses of the fund's Class Z shares (exclusive of taxes, brokerage commissions, interest, commitment fees on borrowings and extraordinary expenses) do not exceed .87 of 1%. The reduction in expenses, pursuant to the undertaking, amounted to $16,721, during the period ended April 30, 2005.
During the period ended April 30, 2005, the Distributor retained $16,166 from commissions earned on sales of the fund's Class A shares, and $72,083 and $610 from contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions of the fund's Class B and Class C shares, respectively.
(b) Under the Distribution Plan (the "Plan") adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, Class B and Class C shares pay the Distributor for distributing their shares at an annual rate of .50 of 1% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class B shares and .75 of 1% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class C shares. During the period ended April 30, 2005, Class B and Class C shares were charged $122,447 and $74,388, respectively, pursuant to the Plan.
(c) Under the Shareholder Services Plan, Class A, Class B, Class C and Class Z shares pay the Distributor at an annual rate of .25 of 1% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class A, Class B and Class C shares and .20 of 1% of the value of the average daily net assets of Class Z shares, for the provision of certain services.The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information, and services related to the maintenance
The Fund 33
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
of shareholder accounts.The Distributor may make payments to Service Agents (a securities dealer, financial institution or other industry professional) in respect of these services. The Distributor determines the amounts to be paid to Service Agents. During the period ended April 30, 2005, Class A, Class B, Class C and Class Z shares were charged $717,320, $61,224, $24,796 and $387,022 respectively, pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan.
The fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the fund. During the period ended April 30, 2005, the fund was charged $275,414 pursuant to the transfer agency agreement.
The components of Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities consist of: management fees $296,801, Rule 12b-1 distribution plan fees $14,325 and shareholder services plan fees $120,609, which are offset against an expense reimbursement currently in effect in the amount of $11,242.
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees and attendance fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets.
(e) A .10% redemption fee is charged and retained by the fund on certain Class Z shares redeemed within thirty days of their issuance.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The aggregate amount of purchases and sales of investment securities, excluding short-term securities, during the period ended April 30, 2005, amounted to $239,678,266 and $284,820,304, respectively.
The fund may invest in financial futures contracts in order to gain exposure to or protect against changes in the market.The fund is exposed to market risk as a result of changes in the value of the underlying financial instruments. Investments in financial futures require the fund to "mark to
34
market" on a daily basis, which reflects the change in the market value of the contract at the close of each day's trading.Typically, variation margin payments are received or made to reflect daily unrealized gains or losses. When the contracts are closed, the fund recognizes a realized gain or loss. These investments require initial margin deposits with a broker, which consist of cash or cash equivalents.The amount of these deposits is determined by the exchange or Board of Trade on which the contract is traded and is subject to change. Contracts open at April 30, 2005 are set forth in the Statement of Financial Futures.
At April 30, 2005, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $616,437,616; accordingly, accumulated net unrealized appreciation on investments was $39,916,028, consisting of $42,038,907 gross unrealized appreciation and $2,122,879 gross unrealized depreciation.
NOTE 5—Legal Matters:
In early 2004, two purported class and derivative actions were filed against Mellon Financial, Mellon Bank, N.A., Dreyfus, Founders Asset Management LLC, and certain directors of the Dreyfus Funds and the Dreyfus Founders Funds (together, the "Funds") in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. In September 2004, plaintiffs served a Consolidated Amended Complaint (the "Amended Complaint") on behalf of a purported class of all persons who acquired interests in any of the Funds between January 30, 1999 and November 17, 2003, and derivatively on behalf of the Funds.The Amended Complaint in the newly styled In re Dreyfus Mutual Funds Fee Litigation also named the Distributor, Premier Mutual Fund Services, Inc. and two additional Fund directors as defendants and alleges violations of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law and common-law claims. Plaintiffs seek to recover allegedly improper and excessive Rule 12b-1 and advisory fees allegedly charged to the Funds for marketing and
The Fund 35
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
distribution services. More specifically, plaintiffs claim, among other things, that 12b-1 fees and directed brokerage were improperly used to pay brokers to recommend the Funds over other funds, and that such payments were not disclosed to investors. In addition, plaintiffs assert that economies of scale and soft-dollar benefits were not passed on to the Funds. Plaintiffs further allege that 12b-1 fees were improperly charged to certain of the Funds that were closed to new investors.The Amended Complaint seeks compensatory and punitive damages, rescission of the advisory contracts, and an accounting and restitution of any unlawful fees, as well as an award of attorneys' fees and litigation expenses. As noted, some of the claims in this litigation are asserted derivatively on behalf of the Funds that have been named as nominal defendants.With respect to such derivative claims, no relief is sought against the Funds. Dreyfus believes the allegations to be totally without merit and intends to defend the action vigorously. Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Amended Complaint on November 12, 2004, and those motions are pending.
Additional lawsuits arising out of these circumstances and presenting similar allegations and requests for relief may be filed against the defendants in the future. Neither Dreyfus nor the Funds believe that any of the pending actions will have a material adverse effect on the Funds or Dreyfus' ability to perform its contract with the Funds.
36
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED |
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM |
Shareholders and Board of Trustees Dreyfus Premier Municipal Bond Fund |
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Dreyfus Premier Municipal Bond Fund, including the statements of investments and financial futures, as of April 30, 2005, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statement of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein.These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement.We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of April 30, 2005 by correspondence with the custodian and others. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Dreyfus Premier Municipal Bond Fund at April 30, 2005, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the indicated periods, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
New York, New York June 15, 2005 |
The Fund 37
IMPORTANT TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
In accordance with federal tax law, the fund hereby designates all the dividends paid from investment income-net during its fiscal year ended April 30, 2005 as "exempt-interest dividends" (not generally subject to regular federal income tax).
As required by federal tax law rules, shareholders will receive notification of their portion of the fund's taxable ordinary dividends (if any) and capital gain distributions (if any) paid for the 2005 calendar year on Form 1099-DIV which will be mailed by January 31, 2006.
38
BOARD MEMBERS INFORMATION (Unaudited)
Joseph S. DiMartino (61) |
Chairman of the Board (1995) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
• Corporate Director and Trustee |
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations: |
• The Muscular Dystrophy Association, Director |
• Levcor International, Inc., an apparel fabric processor, Director |
• Century Business Services, Inc., a provider of outsourcing functions for small and medium size |
companies, Director |
• The Newark Group, a provider of a national market of paper recovery facilities, paperboard |
mills and paperboard converting plants, Director |
• Azimuth Trust, an institutional asset management firm, Member of Board of Managers and |
Advisory Board |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 193 |
——————— |
Clifford L. Alexander, Jr. (71) |
Board Member (1986) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
• President of Alexander & Associates, Inc., a management consulting firm (January 1981-present) |
• Chairman of the Board of Moody's Corporation (October 2000-October 2003) |
• Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of The Dun and Bradstreet Corporation |
(October 1999-September 2000) |
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations: |
• Mutual of America Life Insurance Company, Director |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 66 |
——————— |
Peggy C. Davis (62) |
Board Member (1990) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
• Shad Professor of Law, New York University School of Law (1983-present) |
• Writer and teacher in the fields of evidence, constitutional theory, family law, social sciences |
and the law, legal process and professional methodology and training |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 26 |
The Fund 39
BOARD MEMBERS INFORMATION (Unaudited) (continued)
Ernest Kafka (72) |
Board Member (1986) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
• Physician engaged in private practice specializing in the psychoanalysis of adults and |
adolescents (1962-present) |
• Instructor,The New York Psychoanalytic Institute (1981-present) |
• Associate Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at Cornell Medical School (1987-2002) |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 26 |
——————— |
Nathan Leventhal (62) |
Board Member (1989) |
Principal Occupation During Past 5 Years: |
• A management consultant for various non-profit organizations (May 2004-present) |
• Chairman of the Avery-Fisher Artist Program (November 1997-present) |
• President of Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, Inc. (March 1984-December 2000) |
Other Board Memberships and Affiliations: |
• Movado Group, Inc., Director |
No. of Portfolios for which Board Member Serves: 26 |
——————— |
Once elected all Board Members serve for an indefinite term.The address of the Board Members and Officers is in c/o |
The Dreyfus Corporation, 200 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10166.Additional information about the Board |
Members is available in the fund's Statement of Additional Information which can be obtained from Dreyfus free of |
charge by calling this toll free number: 1-800-554-4611. |
Saul B. Klaman, Emeritus Board Member |
40
OFFICERS OF THE FUND (Unaudited)
STEPHEN E. CANTER, President since March 2000.
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Manager, and an officer of 90 investment companies (comprised of 184 portfolios) managed by the Manager. Mr. Canter also is a Board member and, where applicable, an Executive Committee Member of the other investment management subsidiaries of Mellon Financial Corporation, each of which is an affiliate of the Manager. He is 59 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since May 1995.
STEPHEN R. BYERS, Executive Vice President since November 2002.
Chief Investment Officer,Vice Chairman and a director of the Manager, and an officer of 90 investment companies (comprised of 184 portfolios) managed by the Manager. Mr. Byers also is an officer, director or an Executive Committee Member of certain other investment management subsidiaries of Mellon Financial Corporation, each of which is an affiliate of the Manager. He is 51 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since January 2000.
MARK N. JACOBS, Vice President since March 2000.
Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 200 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 59 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since June 1977.
STEVEN F. NEWMAN, Secretary since March 2000.
Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 200 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 55 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since July 1980.
JANETTE E. FARRAGHER, Assistant Secretary since March 2000.
Associate General Counsel of the Manager, and an officer of 12 investment companies (comprised of 23 portfolios) managed by the Manager. She is 42 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since February 1984.
MICHAEL A. ROSENBERG, Assistant Secretary since March 2000.
Associate General Counsel of the Manager, and an officer of 88 investment companies (comprised of 193 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 45 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since October 1991.
JAMES WINDELS, Treasurer since November 2001.
Director – Mutual Fund Accounting of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 200 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 46 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since April 1985.
GREGORY S. GRUBER, Assistant Treasurer since March 2000.
Senior Accounting Manager – Municipal Bond Funds of the Manager, and an officer of 24 investment companies (comprised of 55 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 46 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since August 1981.
KENNETH J. SANDGREN, Assistant Treasurer since November 2001.
Mutual Funds Tax Director of the Manager, and an officer of 91 investment companies (comprised of 200 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 50 years old and has been an employee of the Manager since June 1993.
The Fund 41
OFFICERS OF THE FUND (Unaudited) (continued)
JOSEPH W. CONNOLLY, Chief Compliance Officer since October 2004.
Chief Compliance Officer of the Manager and The Dreyfus Family of Funds (91 investment companies, comprising 200 portfolios). From November 2001 through March 2004, Mr. Connolly was first Vice-President, Mutual Fund Servicing for Mellon Global Securities Services. In that capacity, Mr. Connolly was responsible for managing Mellon's Custody, Fund Accounting and Fund Administration services to third-party mutual fund clients. He is 47 years old and has served in various capacities with the Manager since 1980, including manager of the firm's Fund Accounting Department from 1997 through October 2001.
WILLIAM GERMENIS, Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer since October 2002.
Vice President and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of the Distributor, and the Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer of 88 investment companies (comprised of 197 portfolios) managed by the Manager. He is 34 years old and has been an employee of the Distributor since October 1998.
42
NOTES
For More | Information | |
Dreyfus Premier | Transfer Agent & | |
Municipal Bond Fund | Dividend Disbursing Agent | |
200 Park Avenue | ||
Dreyfus Transfer, Inc. | ||
New York, NY 10166 | ||
200 Park Avenue | ||
Manager | New York, NY 10166 | |
The Dreyfus Corporation | Distributor | |
200 Park Avenue | ||
Dreyfus Service Corporation | ||
New York, NY 10166 | ||
200 Park Avenue | ||
Custodian | New York, NY 10166 | |
The Bank of New York | ||
One Wall Street | ||
New York, NY 10286 |
Telephone Call your financial representative or 1-800-554-4611
The Dreyfus Premier Family of Funds | ||
144 Glenn Curtiss Boulevard, Uniondale, NY 11556-0144 |
The fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund's Forms N-Q are available on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov and may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities for the 12-month period ended June 30, 2004, is available on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov and without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-645-6561.
© 2005 Dreyfus Service Corporation
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the Registrant's principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions There have been no amendments to, or waivers in connection with, the Code of Ethics during the period covered by this Report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Registrant's Board has determined that Joseph S. DiMartino a member of the Audit Committee of the Board, is an audit committee financial expert as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). Mr. DiMartino is "independent" as defined by the SEC for purposes of audit committee financial expert determinations.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
(a) Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed for each of the last two fiscal years (the "Reporting Periods") for professional services rendered by the Registrant's principal accountant (the "Auditor") for the audit of the Registrant's annual financial statements, or services that are normally provided by the Auditor in connection with the statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the Reporting Periods, were $32,685 in 2004 and $35,626 in 2005.
(b) Audit-Related Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for assurance and related services by the Auditor that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the Registrant's financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of this Item 4 were $-0- in 2004 and $-0- in 2005.
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for non-audit assurance and related services by the Auditor to the Registrant's investment adviser (not including any sub-investment adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the Registrant ("Service Affiliates"), that were reasonably related to the performance of the annual audit of the Service Affiliate, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $273,500 in 2004 and $-0- in 2005.
Note: For the second paragraph in each of (b) through (d) of this Item 4, certain of such services were not pre-approved prior to May 6, 2003, when such services were required to be pre-approved. On and after May 6, 2003, 100% of all services provided by the Auditor were pre-approved as required. For comparative purposes, the fees shown assume that all such services were pre-approved, including services that were not pre-approved prior to the compliance date of the pre-approval requirement.
(c) Tax Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for professional services rendered by the Auditor for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning ("Tax Services") were $3,170 in 2004 and $3,178 in 2005. These services consisted of (i) review or preparation of U.S. federal, state, local and excise tax returns; (ii) U.S. federal, state and local tax planning, advice and assistance regarding statutory, regulatory or administrative developments, (iii) tax advice regarding tax qualification matters and/or treatment of various
financial instruments held or proposed to be acquired or held, and (iv) determination of Passive Foreign Investment Companies.
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Tax Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $-0- in 2004 and $-0- in 2005.
(d) All Other Fees. The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for products and services provided by the Auditor, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this Item, were $383 in 2004 and $624 in 2005. These services consisted of a review of the Registrant's anti-money laundering program.
The aggregate fees billed in the Reporting Periods for Non-Audit Services by the Auditor to Service Affiliates, other than the services reported in paragraphs (b) through (c) of this Item, which required pre-approval by the Audit Committee were $-0- in 2004 and $-0- in 2005.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. The Registrant's Audit Committee has established policies and procedures (the "Policy") for pre-approval (within specified fee limits) of the Auditor's engagements for non-audit services to the Registrant and Service Affiliates without specific case-by-case consideration. Pre-approval considerations include whether the proposed services are compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence. Pre-approvals pursuant to the Policy are considered annually.
Non-Audit Fees. The aggregate non-audit fees billed by the Auditor for services rendered to the Registrant, and rendered to Service Affiliates, for the Reporting Periods were $611,435 in 2004 and $686,197 in 2005.
Auditor Independence. The Registrant's Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to Service Affiliates which were not pre-approved (not requiring pre-approval) is compatible with maintaining the Auditor's independence.
Item 5. | Audit Committee of Listed Registrants. | |||
Not applicable. | [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY] | |||
Item 6. | Schedule of Investments. | |||
Not applicable. | ||||
Item 7. | Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management | |||
Investment Companies. | ||||
Not applicable. | [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY] | |||
Item 8. | Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies. | |||
Not applicable. | [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY, beginning with reports for periods ended | |||
on and after December 31, 2005] | ||||
Item 9. | Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and | |||
Affiliated Purchasers. | ||||
Not applicable. | [CLOSED-END FUNDS ONLY] |
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The Registrant has a Nominating Committee (the "Committee"), which is responsible for selecting and nominating persons for election or appointment by the Registrant's Board as Board members. The Committee has adopted a Nominating Committee Charter (the "Charter"). Pursuant to the Charter, the Committee will consider recommendations for nominees from shareholders submitted to the Secretary of the Registrant, c/o The Dreyfus Corporation Legal Department, 200 Park Avenue, 8th Floor East, New York, New York 10166. A nomination submission must include information regarding the recommended nominee as specified in the Charter. This information includes all information relating to a recommended nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations or proxy statements for the election of Board members, as well as information sufficient to evaluate the factors to be considered by the Committee, including character and integrity, business and professional experience, and whether the person has the ability to apply sound and independent business judgment and would act in the interests of the Registrant and its shareholders.
Nomination submissions are required to be accompanied by a written consent of the individual to stand for election if nominated by the Board and to serve if elected by the shareholders, and such additional information must be provided regarding the recommended nominee as reasonably requested by the Committee.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) | Code of ethics referred to in Item 2. | |
(a)(2) | Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) | |
under the Investment Company Act of 1940. | ||
(a)(3) | Not applicable. | |
(b) | Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) | |
under the Investment Company Act of 1940. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dreyfus Premier Municipal Bond Fund
By: | /s/ Stephen E. Canter | |
Stephen E. Canter | ||
President | ||
Date: | June 27, 2005 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: | /s/ Stephen E. Canter | |
Stephen E. Canter | ||
Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date: | June 27, 2005 | |
By: | /s/ James Windels | |
James Windels | ||
Chief Financial Officer | ||
Date: | June 27, 2005 |
EXHIBIT INDEX
(a)(1) | Code of ethics referred to in Item 2. | |
(a)(2) | Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a- | |
2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT) | ||
(b) | Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a- | |
2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT) |