UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-5262
MFS SERIES TRUST VIII
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Susan S. Newton
Massachusetts Financial Services Company
111 Huntington Avenue
Boston, Massachusetts 02199
(Name and address of agents for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 954-5000
Date of fiscal year end: October 31
Date of reporting period: October 31, 2013
ITEM 1. | REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS. |
ANNUAL REPORT
October 31, 2013
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616719logo_03.jpg)
MFS® GLOBAL GROWTH FUND
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616719art_03.jpg)
WGF-ANN
MFS® GLOBAL GROWTH FUND
CONTENTS
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616719manning_photo.jpg)
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholders:
The global economy is trending toward growth again despite risks created by the U.S. government’s gridlock. The eurozone has emerged from its 18-month-long recession.
However, unemployment in the region persists at historically high levels. The U.K. economy is on the rebound. China’s economic gauges are improving and point toward expansion. And Japan’s aggressive program of monetary easing is showing signs of success.
The U.S. Federal Reserve’s expected tapering of its bond-buying stimulus program — telegraphed in the spring and delayed in September — has weighed on global markets. Emerging markets have borne much of the brunt, with currency values dropping and nervous investors seeking safety elsewhere. The greatest
threat to global economic recovery now appears to be related to the U.S. government’s impasse. While the tensions surrounding the 16-day government shutdown and potential U.S. debt default have dissipated, another round of potential gridlock lies ahead early in 2014, with the next U.S. budget and debt ceiling deadlines.
As always, managing risk in the face of uncertainty remains a top priority for investors. At MFS®, our uniquely collaborative investment process employs integrated, global research and active risk management. Our global team of investment professionals shares ideas and evaluates opportunities across continents, investment disciplines and asset classes — all with a goal of building better insights, and ultimately better results, for our clients.
We are mindful of the many economic challenges investors face, and believe it is more important than ever to maintain a long-term view and employ time-tested principles, such as asset allocation and diversification. We remain confident that our unique approach can serve investors well as they work with their financial advisors to identify and pursue the most suitable opportunities.
Respectfully,
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616719manning_sig.jpg)
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
December 16, 2013
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Portfolio structure
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616719g77h11.jpg)
| | | | |
Top ten holdings | | | | |
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton S.A. | | | 2.8% | |
Google, Inc., “A” | | | 2.4% | |
Groupe Danone | | | 2.4% | |
Compass Group PLC | | | 2.1% | |
Schlumberger Ltd. | | | 2.1% | |
Pernod Ricard S.A. | | | 2.1% | |
Accenture PLC, “A” | | | 2.0% | |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd., ADR | | | 1.8% | |
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | | | 1.8% | |
Danaher Corp. | | | 1.8% | |
| |
Equity sectors | | | | |
Consumer Staples | | | 16.6% | |
Technology | | | 12.4% | |
Financial Services | | | 11.4% | |
Industrial Goods & Services | | | 11.0% | |
Health Care | | | 10.9% | |
Retailing | | | 10.4% | |
Special Products & Services | | | 8.1% | |
Leisure | | | 6.5% | |
Basic Materials | | | 4.7% | |
Energy | | | 4.3% | |
Transportation | | | 2.3% | |
Autos & Housing | | | 0.6% | |
| | | | |
Issuer country weightings (x) | |
United States | | | 51.5% | |
United Kingdom | | | 12.1% | |
France | | | 10.5% | |
Switzerland | | | 6.9% | |
Brazil | | | 3.8% | |
Germany | | | 3.5% | |
Taiwan | | | 1.8% | |
South Korea | | | 1.4% | |
Denmark | | | 1.2% | |
Other Countries | | | 7.3% | |
|
Currency exposure weightings (y) | |
United States Dollar | | | 52.5% | |
Euro | | | 16.0% | |
British Pound Sterling | | | 12.1% | |
Swiss Franc | | | 6.9% | |
Brazilian Real | | | 3.8% | |
Taiwan Dollar | | | 1.8% | |
South Korean Won | | | 1.4% | |
Danish Krone | | | 1.2% | |
Japanese Yen | | | 1.0% | |
Other Currencies | | | 3.3% | |
2
Portfolio Composition – continued
(x) | Represents the portfolio’s exposure to issuer countries as a percentage of a portfolio’s net assets. |
(y) | Represents the portfolio’s exposure to a particular currency as a percentage of a portfolio’s net assets. |
Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/13.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
Summary of Results
For the twelve months ended October 31, 2013, Class A shares of the MFS Global Growth Fund (“fund”) provided a total return of 23.77%, at net asset value. This compares with a return of 23.63% for the fund’s benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Growth Index.
Market Environment
At the beginning of the period, year-end fiscal cliff negotiations between the Republicans in the US Congress and President Obama were a particular source of market attention, where uncertainty surrounding the fiscal negotiations continued right up to the end-of-year deadline. A last minute political agreement averted the worst-case scenario and markets gravitated towards risk assets again, though the implementation of the US budget sequester, combined with concerns surrounding the Italian election results, was a source of uncertainty which lingered throughout the first half of the period.
The more dominant features of the first few months of 2013 included a marked improvement in market sentiment as global macroeconomic indicators improved, monetary easing by the Bank of Japan accelerated and fears of fiscal austerity in the US waned. In the middle of the period, concerns that the US Federal Reserve (Fed) would begin tapering its quantitative easing (QE) program caused sovereign bond yields to spike, credit spreads to widen, and equity valuations to fall.
Toward the end of the period, the Fed’s decision to postpone QE tapering surprised markets. Favorable market reactions were tempered, however, by tense negotiations over US fiscal policy which resulted in a 16-day partial shutdown of the federal government and a short-term extension in the debt ceiling. The volatility was short-lived, however, as an extension of budget and debt ceiling deadlines allowed the government to re-open, and subsequent economic data reflected moderate but resilient US growth. Also well-received was the decision by the European Central Bank to cut its policy rate as inflation pressures waned in the region. In addition, equity investors appeared to have concluded that there would be no major change in US monetary policy as a result of the nomination of Janet Yellen as the new Fed Chair for a term beginning in early 2014.
Contributors to Performance
The combination of favorable stock selection and the fund’s underweight position in the basic materials sector was a primary factor that benefited performance relative to the MSCI All Country World Growth Index. However, there were no individual stocks within this sector that were among the fund’s top relative contributors during the reporting period.
An overweight position and, to a lesser extent, positive stock selection in the industrials goods & services sector also boosted relative results. Overweight positions in industrial and consumer products company Danaher and wiring devices and cable systems manufacturer Legrand (France) bolstered relative results. Danaher’s stock appreciated throughout the period as the company reported strong organic revenue growth
4
Management Review – continued
primarily in its Life Science & Diagnostics business. Holdings of building systems and aerospace products and services provider United Technologies also benefited relative performance as the security was removed from the benchmark in the middle of the period and missed the subsequent price increase. Holdings of precision instruments manufacturer Mettler-Toledo International (b) further supported relative performance.
Strong stock selection in the technology sector was another positive factor for relative results. The fund’s underweight position in shares of computer and personal electronics maker Apple aided relative performance. The stock’s rebound late in the period was not enough to offset its weak performance earlier in the year as management continued to provide lower-than-expected guidance due to slower revenue growth prior to the company’s announcement of their fifth generation of iPhones in September. Overweight positions in strong-performing semiconductor company Microchip Technology and internet search giant Google also contributed to relative returns.
Elsewhere, holdings of automotive components supplier Johnson Controls contributed to relative performance as the security was removed from the benchmark early in the period and missed the subsequent rise in the stock price. Overweight positions in life sciences supply company Thermo Fisher Scientific and advertising and marketing services provider Publicis Groupe (France) further aided relative results. Thermo Fisher continued to report solid organic revenue growth throughout the year and the company’s planned acquisition of Life Technology Corporation was also beneficial to the stock price.
During the reporting period, the fund’s relative currency exposure, resulting primarily from differences between the fund’s and the benchmark’s exposures to holdings of securities denominated in foreign currencies, benefited relative performance. All of MFS’ investment decisions are driven by the fundamentals of each individual opportunity and, as such, it is common for our portfolios to have different currency exposure than the benchmark.
Detractors from Performance
Stock selection in the retailing sector held back relative results. Overweight positions in apparel manufacturer Cia Hering (Brazil) and global sourcing and supply chain management company Li & Fung (Hong Kong) hindered relative performance. Cia Hering’s stock declined half way through the period as the company reported weak same-store-sales growth during the second quarter of 2013 primarily due to poor weather and protests in Brazil. Li & Fung’s shares tumbled early in 2013 after management had to provide a profit warning due to larger-than-expected restructuring charges in its United States division.
Stock selection in the health care sector also negatively impacted relative performance. Not holding biotech firm Gilead Sciences and pharmaceutical and diagnostic company Roche Holding (Switzerland) hurt relative returns as both stocks outpaced the benchmark during the reporting period.
In other sectors, an overweight position in oil and gas turnkey contractor Saipem (Italy) and data storage systems provider EMC and holdings of securities trading systems developer BM&F Bovespa (b) (Brazil) dampened relative results. Shares of Saipem
5
Management Review – continued
declined significantly throughout the period as the stock was negatively impacted by the company’s Algerian bribery scandal and management reporting two profit warnings related to existing contracts. Not holding strong-performing car maker Toyota Motor (Japan), technology investment firm Softbank (Japan) and aerospace company Boeing further weighed on relative performance.
Respectfully,
| | |
David Antonelli | | Jeffrey Constantino |
Portfolio Manager | | Portfolio Manager |
(b) | Security is not a benchmark constituent. |
The views expressed in this report are those of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover and do not necessarily reflect the views of MFS or any other person in the MFS organization. These views are subject to change at any time based on market or other conditions, and MFS disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice or an indication of trading intent on behalf of any MFS portfolio. References to specific securities are not recommendations of such securities, and may not be representative of any MFS portfolio’s current or future investments.
6
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY THROUGH 10/31/13
The following chart illustrates a representative class of the fund’s historical performance in comparison to its benchmark(s). Performance results include the deduction of the maximum applicable sales charge and reflect the percentage change in net asset value, including reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions. The performance of other share classes will be greater than or less than that of the class depicted below. Benchmarks are unmanaged and may not be invested in directly. Benchmark returns do not reflect sales charges, commissions or expenses. (See Notes to Performance Summary.)
Performance data shown represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate so your shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than the original cost; current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. The performance shown does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
Growth of a Hypothetical $10,000 Investment
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616719g56w13.jpg)
7
Performance Summary – continued
Total Returns through 10/31/13
Average annual without sales charge
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Share class | | Class inception date | | 1-yr | | 5-yr | | 10-yr | | Life (t) | | |
| | A | | 11/18/93 | | 23.77% | | 14.60% | | 8.16% | | N/A | | |
| | B | | 11/18/93 | | 22.80% | | 13.74% | | 7.35% | | N/A | | |
| | C | | 1/03/94 | | 22.82% | | 13.75% | | 7.35% | | N/A | | |
| | I | | 1/02/97 | | 24.05% | | 14.88% | | 8.43% | | N/A | | |
| | R1 | | 4/01/05 | | 22.87% | | 13.75% | | N/A | | 6.41% | | |
| | R2 | | 10/31/03 | | 23.47% | | 14.32% | | 7.76% | | N/A | | |
| | R3 | | 4/01/05 | | 23.74% | | 14.61% | | N/A | | 7.20% | | |
| | R4 | | 4/01/05 | | 24.05% | | 14.89% | | N/A | | 7.49% | | |
| | R5 | | 3/01/13 | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | | 12.41% | | |
Comparative benchmark | | | | | | | | | | |
| | MSCI All Country World Growth Index (f) | | 23.63% | | 14.72% | | 7.91% | | N/A | | |
Average annual with sales charge | | | | | | | | | | |
| | A With initial Sales Charge (5.75%) | | 16.65% | | 13.25% | | 7.52% | | N/A | | |
| | B With CDSC (Declining over six years from 4% to 0%) (v) | | 18.80% | | 13.50% | | 7.35% | | N/A | | |
| | C With CDSC (1% for 12 months) (v) | | 21.82% | | 13.75% | | 7.35% | | N/A | | |
CDSC – Contingent Deferred Sales Charge.
Class I, R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 shares do not have a sales charge.
(f) | Source: FactSet Research Systems Inc. |
(t) | For the period from the class inception date through the stated period end (for those share classes with less than 10 years of performance history). No comparative benchmark information is provided for “life” periods. (See Notes to Performance Summary.) |
(v) | Assuming redemption at the end of the applicable period. |
Benchmark Definition
MSCI All Country World Growth Index – a market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure equity market performance for growth securities in the global developed and emerging markets.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
Notes to Performance Summary
Average annual total return represents the average annual change in value for each share class for the periods presented. Life returns are presented where the share class has less than 10 years of performance history and represent the average annual total return from the class inception date to the stated period end date. As the fund’s share
8
Performance Summary – continued
classes may have different inception dates, the life returns may represent different time periods and may not be comparable. As a result, no comparative benchmark performance information is provided for life periods.
Performance results reflect any applicable expense subsidies and waivers in effect during the periods shown. Without such subsidies and waivers the fund’s performance results would be less favorable. Please see the prospectus and financial statements for complete details.
Performance results do not include adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and may differ from amounts reported in the financial highlights.
From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower.
9
EXPENSE TABLE
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period, May 1, 2013 through October 31, 2013
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. This example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period May 1, 2013 through October 31, 2013.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
10
Expense Table – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share Class | | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | | | Beginning Account Value 5/01/13 | | | Ending Account Value 10/31/13 | | | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 5/01/13-10/31/13 | |
A | | Actual | | | 1.47% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,085.18 | | | | $7.73 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.47% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.80 | | | | $7.48 | |
B | | Actual | | | 2.23% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,081.12 | | | | $11.70 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 2.23% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,013.96 | | | | $11.32 | |
C | | Actual | | | 2.23% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,081.22 | | | | $11.70 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 2.23% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,013.96 | | | | $11.32 | |
I | | Actual | | | 1.24% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,086.71 | | | | $6.52 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.24% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.95 | | | | $6.31 | |
R1 | | Actual | | | 2.24% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,081.36 | | | | $11.75 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 2.24% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,013.91 | | | | $11.37 | |
R2 | | Actual | | | 1.74% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,083.99 | | | | $9.14 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.74% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.43 | | | | $8.84 | |
R3 | | Actual | | | 1.49% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,085.21 | | | | $7.83 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.49% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,017.69 | | | | $7.58 | |
R4 | | Actual | | | 1.24% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,086.69 | | | | $6.52 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.24% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.95 | | | | $6.31 | |
R5 | | Actual | | | 1.15% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,087.34 | | | | $6.05 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.15% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.41 | | | | $5.85 | |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid are equal to each class’s annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. |
Notes to Expense Table
Each class with a Rule 12b-1 service fee is subject to a rebate of a portion of such fee. Such rebates are included in the expense ratios above. For Class A and C shares, this rebate reduced the respective expense ratios above by 0.01%. See Note 3 in the Notes to Financial Statements for additional information.
11
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
10/31/13
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
| | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks - 99.2% | | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Aerospace - 3.2% | | | | | | | | |
Precision Castparts Corp. | | | 7,169 | | | $ | 1,816,983 | |
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, “C” | | | 104,674 | | | | 1,930,094 | |
Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC, IPS (a) | | | 9,001,964 | | | | 14,434 | |
United Technologies Corp. | | | 34,320 | | | | 3,646,500 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,408,011 | |
Alcoholic Beverages - 4.4% | | | | | | | | |
Carlsberg Group | | | 10,827 | | | $ | 1,081,074 | |
Diageo PLC | | | 95,309 | | | | 3,036,503 | |
Heineken N.V. | | | 18,059 | | | | 1,248,048 | |
Pernod Ricard S.A. | | | 39,621 | | | | 4,760,894 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,126,519 | |
Apparel Manufacturers - 5.8% | | | | | | | | |
Cia.Hering S.A. | | | 105,100 | | | $ | 1,527,098 | |
Compagnie Financiere Richemont S.A. | | | 15,618 | | | | 1,601,648 | |
Li & Fung Ltd. | | | 1,542,400 | | | | 2,180,408 | |
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton S.A. | | | 33,095 | | | | 6,371,746 | |
NIKE, Inc., “B” | | | 20,380 | | | | 1,543,989 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 13,224,889 | |
Automotive - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
Johnson Controls, Inc. | | | 28,100 | | | $ | 1,296,815 | |
| | |
Broadcasting - 4.7% | | | | | | | | |
Discovery Communications, Inc., “A” (a) | | | 12,930 | | | $ | 1,149,736 | |
Publicis Groupe | | | 28,439 | | | | 2,372,000 | |
Time Warner, Inc. | | | 40,090 | | | | 2,755,787 | |
Viacom, Inc., “B” | | | 14,940 | | | | 1,244,353 | |
Walt Disney Co. | | | 46,390 | | | | 3,181,890 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,703,766 | |
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 2.7% | | | | | | | | |
BM&F Bovespa S.A. | | | 369,800 | | | $ | 2,091,495 | |
Charles Schwab Corp. | | | 47,550 | | | | 1,077,008 | |
Franklin Resources, Inc. | | | 53,867 | | | | 2,901,277 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,069,780 | |
Business Services - 8.1% | | | | | | | | |
Accenture PLC, “A” | | | 62,180 | | | $ | 4,570,230 | |
Brenntag AG | | | 12,595 | | | | 2,134,187 | |
12
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Common Stocks - continued | | | | | | | | |
Business Services - continued | | | | | | | | |
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., “A” (a) | | | 26,830 | | | $ | 2,332,332 | |
Compass Group PLC | | | 340,690 | | | | 4,899,973 | |
Experian Group Ltd. | | | 111,091 | | | | 2,262,166 | |
Intertek Group PLC | | | 25,279 | | | | 1,350,538 | |
LPS Brasil - Consultoria de Imoveis S.A. | | | 125,900 | | | | 881,783 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 18,431,209 | |
Chemicals - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Monsanto Co. | | | 15,048 | | | $ | 1,578,234 | |
| | |
Computer Software - 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
Autodesk, Inc. (a) | | | 27,730 | | | $ | 1,106,704 | |
Dassault Systemes S.A. | | | 7,539 | | | | 916,231 | |
Oracle Corp. | | | 81,080 | | | | 2,716,180 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,739,115 | |
Computer Software - Systems - 2.8% | | | | | | | | |
Apple, Inc. | | | 2,784 | | | $ | 1,454,222 | |
EMC Corp. | | | 149,120 | | | | 3,589,318 | |
International Business Machines Corp. | | | 8,130 | | | | 1,456,977 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,500,517 | |
Consumer Products - 5.0% | | | | | | | | |
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | | | 62,106 | | | $ | 4,020,121 | |
Procter & Gamble Co. | | | 47,330 | | | | 3,821,898 | |
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC | | | 45,385 | | | | 3,527,905 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 11,369,924 | |
Electrical Equipment - 7.1% | | | | | | | | |
Amphenol Corp., “A” | | | 16,100 | | | $ | 1,292,669 | |
Danaher Corp. | | | 55,680 | | | | 4,013,971 | |
Legrand S.A. | | | 21,573 | | | | 1,225,232 | |
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc. (a) | | | 10,817 | | | | 2,676,775 | |
Schneider Electric S.A. | | | 19,638 | | | | 1,654,470 | |
Sensata Technologies Holding B.V. (a) | | | 78,050 | | | | 2,937,022 | |
W.W. Grainger, Inc. | | | 9,218 | | | | 2,479,365 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 16,279,504 | |
Electronics - 3.9% | | | | | | | | |
Microchip Technology, Inc. | | | 75,880 | | | $ | 3,259,805 | |
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. | | | 1,201 | | | | 1,658,699 | |
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd., ADR | | | 222,978 | | | | 4,105,025 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 9,023,529 | |
13
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Common Stocks - continued | | | | | | | | |
Energy - Independent - 1.1% | | | | | | | | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | | | 25,250 | | | $ | 2,426,020 | |
| | |
Energy - Integrated - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
BG Group PLC | | | 70,758 | | | $ | 1,444,829 | |
| | |
Food & Beverages - 7.1% | | | | | | | | |
Chr. Hansen Holding A.S. | | | 43,918 | | | $ | 1,626,963 | |
Groupe Danone | | | 75,042 | | | | 5,565,138 | |
M. Dias Branco S.A. Industria e Comercio de Alimentos | | | 24,200 | | | | 1,135,030 | |
Mead Johnson Nutrition Co., “A” | | | 34,190 | | | | 2,791,955 | |
Nestle S.A. | | | 51,148 | | | | 3,692,284 | |
PepsiCo, Inc. | | | 18,260 | | | | 1,535,483 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 16,346,853 | |
Food & Drug Stores - 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
CVS Caremark Corp. | | | 56,440 | | | $ | 3,513,954 | |
Sundrug Co. Ltd. | | | 25,200 | | | | 1,251,927 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,765,881 | |
General Merchandise - 1.5% | | | | | | | | |
Dollarama, Inc. | | | 19,690 | | | $ | 1,692,435 | |
Lojas Renner S.A. | | | 30,200 | | | | 909,963 | |
Target Corp. | | | 14,460 | | | | 936,863 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,539,261 | |
Internet - 3.6% | | | | | | | | |
Google, Inc., “A” (a) | | | 5,408 | | | $ | 5,573,377 | |
Naver Corp. | | | 2,693 | | | | 1,515,646 | |
Yahoo Japan Corp. | | | 226,000 | | | | 1,050,361 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 8,139,384 | |
Machinery & Tools - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Schindler Holding AG | | | 10,989 | | | $ | 1,558,698 | |
| | |
Major Banks - 1.6% | | | | | | | | |
HSBC Holdings PLC | | | 83,651 | | | $ | 914,874 | |
Standard Chartered PLC | | | 111,027 | | | | 2,669,420 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,584,294 | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 1.4% | | | | | | | | |
Express Scripts Holding Co. (a) | | | 52,150 | | | $ | 3,260,418 | |
| | |
Medical Equipment - 6.1% | | | | | | | | |
Abbott Laboratories | | | 26,410 | | | $ | 965,286 | |
DENTSPLY International, Inc. | | | 69,700 | | | | 3,282,870 | |
14
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Common Stocks - continued | | | | | | | | |
Medical Equipment - continued | | | | | | | | |
Essilor International S.A. | | | 10,018 | | | $ | 1,075,913 | |
Sonova Holding AG | | | 23,712 | | | | 3,086,336 | |
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | | | 36,650 | | | | 3,583,637 | |
Waters Corp. (a) | | | 18,240 | | | | 1,840,781 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 13,834,823 | |
Metals & Mining - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
Rio Tinto PLC | | | 52,040 | | | $ | 2,635,065 | |
| | |
Oil Services - 2.6% | | | | | | | | |
Saipem S.p.A. | | | 49,977 | | | $ | 1,171,199 | |
Schlumberger Ltd. | | | 50,830 | | | | 4,763,788 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 5,934,987 | |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 7.1% | | | | | | | | |
Credicorp Ltd. | | | 15,342 | | | $ | 2,095,717 | |
HDFC Bank Ltd. | | | 195,591 | | | | 2,166,762 | |
Itau Unibanco Holding S.A., ADR | | | 139,402 | | | | 2,148,185 | |
Julius Baer Group Ltd. | | | 56,858 | | | | 2,794,179 | |
MasterCard, Inc., “A” | | | 2,984 | | | | 2,139,826 | |
Sberbank of Russia, ADR | | | 111,751 | | | | 1,427,060 | |
Visa, Inc., “A” | | | 18,096 | | | | 3,558,940 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 16,330,669 | |
Pharmaceuticals - 3.4% | | | | | | | | |
Allergan, Inc. | | | 12,328 | | | $ | 1,117,040 | |
Bayer AG | | | 19,901 | | | | 2,473,464 | |
Johnson & Johnson | | | 29,090 | | | | 2,694,025 | |
Zoetis, Inc. | | | 49,920 | | | | 1,580,467 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,864,996 | |
Railroad & Shipping - 1.4% | | | | | | | | |
Kuehne & Nagel International AG | | | 25,270 | | | $ | 3,194,433 | |
| | |
Restaurants - 1.8% | | | | | | | | |
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 26,235 | | | $ | 2,532,202 | |
Whitbread PLC | | | 29,329 | | | | 1,614,407 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,146,609 | |
Specialty Chemicals - 2.9% | | | | | | | | |
Croda International PLC | | | 34,410 | | | $ | 1,344,014 | |
Linde AG | | | 12,241 | | | | 2,325,999 | |
Praxair, Inc. | | | 14,540 | | | | 1,813,283 | |
15
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Common Stocks - continued | | | | | | | | |
Specialty Chemicals - continued | | | | | | | | |
Symrise AG | | | 24,594 | | | $ | 1,042,514 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,525,810 | |
Specialty Stores - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Industria de Diseno Textil S.A. | | | 14,260 | | | $ | 2,342,743 | |
| | |
Trucking - 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. | | | 46,700 | | | $ | 2,115,043 | |
Total Common Stocks (Identified Cost, $176,765,320) | | | | | | $ | 226,742,628 | |
| | |
Money Market Funds - 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.1%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v) | | | 2,047,635 | | | $ | 2,047,635 | |
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $178,812,955) | | | | | | $ | 228,790,263 | |
| | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - (0.1)% | | | | | | | (149,232 | ) |
Net Assets - 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 228,641,031 | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(v) | Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
ADR | | American Depositary Receipt |
IPS | | International Preference Stock |
PLC | | Public Limited Company |
See Notes to Financial Statements
16
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 10/31/13
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
| | | | |
Assets | | | | |
Investments- | | | | |
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $176,765,320) | | | $226,742,628 | |
Underlying affiliated funds, at cost and value | | | 2,047,635 | |
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $178,812,955) | | | $228,790,263 | |
Cash | | | 14,511 | |
Receivables for | | | | |
Fund shares sold | | | 128,329 | |
Interest and dividends | | | 207,592 | |
Total assets | | | $229,140,695 | |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payable for fund shares reacquired | | | $220,715 | |
Payable to affiliates | | | | |
Investment adviser | | | 11,068 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | 139,580 | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 3,960 | |
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | | | 26,570 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 97,771 | |
Total liabilities | | | $499,664 | |
Net assets | | | $228,641,031 | |
Net assets consist of | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | $171,159,882 | |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | | 49,979,549 | |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 6,967,038 | |
Undistributed net investment income | | | 534,562 | |
Net assets | | | $228,641,031 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | | | 6,810,214 | |
17
Statement of Assets and Liabilities – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Net assets | | | Shares outstanding | | | Net asset value per share (a) | |
Class A | | | $186,818,239 | | | | 5,512,000 | | | | $33.89 | |
Class B | | | 8,165,138 | | | | 264,031 | | | | 30.92 | |
Class C | | | 13,433,446 | | | | 438,713 | | | | 30.62 | |
Class I | | | 11,511,277 | | | | 332,770 | | | | 34.59 | |
Class R1 | | | 867,168 | | | | 28,369 | | | | 30.57 | |
Class R2 | | | 3,372,089 | | | | 102,053 | | | | 33.04 | |
Class R3 | | | 3,419,129 | | | | 101,298 | | | | 33.75 | |
Class R4 | | | 942,145 | | | | 27,732 | | | | 33.97 | |
Class R5 | | | 112,400 | | | | 3,248 | | | | 34.61 | |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Class A, for which the maximum offering price per share was $35.96 [100 / 94.25 x $33.89]. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering price of Class A shares is reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, and Class C shares. Redemption price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for Classes I, R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
18
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year ended 10/31/13
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
| | | | |
Net investment income | | | | |
Income | | | | |
Dividends | | | $3,953,483 | |
Interest | | | 39,479 | |
Dividends from underlying affiliated funds | | | 1,868 | |
Foreign taxes withheld | | | (166,484 | ) |
Total investment income | | | $3,828,346 | |
Expenses | | | | |
Management fee | | | $1,900,469 | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 670,831 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | 365,984 | |
Administrative services fee | | | 37,360 | |
Independent Trustees’ compensation | | | 11,484 | |
Custodian fee | | | 67,387 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 23,507 | |
Audit and tax fees | | | 80,300 | |
Legal fees | | | 1,986 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 139,161 | |
Total expenses | | | $3,298,469 | |
Fees paid indirectly | | | (18 | ) |
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser and distributor | | | (12,883 | ) |
Net expenses | | | $3,285,568 | |
Net investment income | | | $542,778 | |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | | |
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | | | | |
Investments | | | $10,873,947 | |
Foreign currency | | | 17,753 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | $10,891,700 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | | |
Investments | | | $33,164,021 | |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | | (4,359 | ) |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | $33,159,662 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | $44,051,362 | |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $44,594,140 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
19
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Change in net assets | | | | | | |
From operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | $542,778 | | | | $493,304 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 10,891,700 | | | | 5,256,023 | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | 33,159,662 | | | | 9,094,708 | |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $44,594,140 | | | | $14,844,035 | |
Distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(460,035 | ) | | | $(513,017 | ) |
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | | | $(9,426,579 | ) | | | $(21,012,800 | ) |
Total change in net assets | | | $34,707,526 | | | | $(6,681,782 | ) |
Net assets | | | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | | | 193,933,505 | | | | 200,615,287 | |
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $534,562 and $434,066, respectively) | | | $228,641,031 | | | | $193,933,505 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
20
Financial Statements
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the past 5 years (or life of a particular share class, if shorter). Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $27.45 | | | | $25.50 | | | | $24.88 | | | | $21.93 | | | | $17.35 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.10 | | | | $0.09 | | | | $0.11 | | | | $0.08 | | | | $0.11 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 6.41 | | | | 1.93 | | | | 0.57 | | | | 2.96 | | | | 4.47 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $6.51 | | | | $2.02 | | | | $0.68 | | | | $3.04 | | | | $4.58 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.07 | ) | | | $(0.07 | ) | | | $(0.06 | ) | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $0.00 | (w) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $33.89 | | | | $27.45 | | | | $25.50 | | | | $24.88 | | | | $21.93 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 23.77 | | | | 7.98 | | | | 2.73 | | | | 13.92 | | | | 26.40 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.49 | | | | 1.53 | | | | 1.53 | | | | 1.55 | | | | 1.70 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.49 | | | | 1.53 | | | | 1.53 | | | | 1.55 | | | | 1.67 | |
Net investment income | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.42 | | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.59 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 31 | | | | 37 | | | | 39 | | | | 63 | | | | 83 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $186,818 | | | | $159,905 | | | | $164,474 | | | | $183,544 | | | | $180,278 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
21
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $25.18 | | | | $23.49 | | | | $23.03 | | | | $20.37 | | | | $16.24 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment loss (d) | | | $(0.12 | ) | | | $(0.10 | ) | | | $(0.08 | ) | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.03 | ) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 5.86 | | | | 1.79 | | | | 0.54 | | | | 2.75 | | | | 4.16 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $5.74 | | | | $1.69 | | | | $0.46 | | | | $2.66 | | | | $4.13 | |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $30.92 | | | | $25.18 | | | | $23.49 | | | | $23.03 | | | | $20.37 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 22.80 | | | | 7.19 | | | | 2.00 | | | | 13.06 | | | | 25.43 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 2.24 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.30 | | | | 2.43 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 2.24 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.30 | | | | 2.43 | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.42 | ) | | | (0.43 | ) | | | (0.35 | ) | | | (0.43 | ) | | | (0.19 | ) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 31 | | | | 37 | | | | 39 | | | | 63 | | | | 83 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $8,165 | | | | $7,966 | | | | $9,854 | | | | $13,563 | | | | $17,219 | |
| |
Class C | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $24.93 | | | | $23.25 | | | | $22.81 | | | | $20.17 | | | | $16.08 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment loss (d) | | | $(0.12 | ) | | | $(0.10 | ) | | | $(0.07 | ) | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.03 | ) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 5.81 | | | | 1.78 | | | | 0.51 | | | | 2.73 | | | | 4.12 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $5.69 | | | | $1.68 | | | | $0.44 | | | | $2.64 | | | | $4.09 | |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $30.62 | | | | $24.93 | | | | $23.25 | | | | $22.81 | | | | $20.17 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 22.82 | | | | 7.23 | | | | 1.93 | | | | 13.09 | | | | 25.44 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 2.24 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.30 | | | | 2.42 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 2.24 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.30 | | | | 2.41 | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.43 | ) | | | (0.42 | ) | | | (0.31 | ) | | | (0.41 | ) | | | (0.19 | ) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 31 | | | | 37 | | | | 39 | | | | 63 | | | | 83 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $13,433 | | | | $11,304 | | | | $11,327 | | | | $14,485 | | | | $13,598 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
22
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $28.02 | | | | $26.03 | | | | $25.39 | | | | $22.37 | | | | $17.73 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.18 | | | | $0.16 | | | | $0.18 | | | | $0.14 | | | | $0.16 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 6.53 | | | | 1.97 | | | | 0.58 | | | | 3.02 | | | | 4.55 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $6.71 | | | | $2.13 | | | | $0.76 | | | | $3.16 | | | | $4.71 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.14 | ) | | | $(0.14 | ) | | | $(0.12 | ) | | | $(0.14 | ) | | | $(0.07 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $34.59 | | | | $28.02 | | | | $26.03 | | | | $25.39 | | | | $22.37 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 24.05 | | | | 8.29 | | | | 2.99 | | | | 14.18 | | | | 26.68 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.24 | | | | 1.28 | | | | 1.28 | | | | 1.30 | | | | 1.42 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.24 | | | | 1.28 | | | | 1.28 | | | | 1.30 | | | | 1.41 | |
Net investment income | | | 0.56 | | | | 0.58 | | | | 0.67 | | | | 0.60 | | | | 0.84 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 31 | | | | 37 | | | | 39 | | | | 63 | | | | 83 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $11,511 | | | | $7,513 | | | | $6,731 | | | | $6,788 | | | | $5,875 | |
| |
Class R1 | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $24.88 | | | | $23.22 | | | | $22.77 | | | | $20.14 | | | | $16.05 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment loss (d) | | | $(0.12 | ) | | | $(0.09 | ) | | | $(0.08 | ) | | | $(0.08 | ) | | | $(0.02 | ) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 5.81 | | | | 1.75 | | | | 0.53 | | | | 2.71 | | | | 4.11 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $5.69 | | | | $1.66 | | | �� | $0.45 | | | | $2.63 | | | | $4.09 | |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $30.57 | | | | $24.88 | | | | $23.22 | | | | $22.77 | | | | $20.14 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 22.87 | | | | 7.15 | | | | 1.98 | | | | 13.06 | | | | 25.48 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 2.24 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.30 | | | | 2.41 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 2.24 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.28 | | | | 2.30 | | | | 2.41 | |
Net investment loss | | | (0.42 | ) | | | (0.39 | ) | | | (0.33 | ) | | | (0.38 | ) | | | (0.11 | ) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 31 | | | | 37 | | | | 39 | | | | 63 | | | | 83 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $867 | | | | $763 | | | | $775 | | | | $791 | | | | $886 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
23
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class R2 | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $26.76 | | | | $24.84 | | | | $24.25 | | | | $21.37 | | | | $16.95 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.03 | | | | $0.02 | | | | $0.04 | | | | $0.02 | | | | $0.06 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 6.25 | | | | 1.90 | | | | 0.55 | | | | 2.90 | | | | 4.36 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $6.28 | | | | $1.92 | | | | $0.59 | | | | $2.92 | | | | $4.42 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $— | | | | $— | | | | $0.00 | (w) | | | $(0.04 | ) | | | $— | |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $33.04 | | | | $26.76 | | | | $24.84 | | | | $24.25 | | | | $21.37 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 23.47 | | | | 7.73 | | | | 2.45 | | | | 13.66 | | | | 26.08 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.74 | | | | 1.78 | | | | 1.78 | | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.93 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.74 | | | | 1.78 | | | | 1.78 | | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.93 | |
Net investment income | | | 0.08 | | | | 0.09 | | | | 0.14 | | | | 0.10 | | | | 0.36 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 31 | | | | 37 | | | | 39 | | | | 63 | | | | 83 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $3,372 | | | | $3,250 | | | | $4,586 | | | | $5,250 | | | | $5,128 | |
| |
Class R3 | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $27.35 | | | | $25.41 | | | | $24.80 | | | | $21.86 | | | | $17.29 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.10 | | | | $0.09 | | | | $0.11 | | | | $0.08 | | | | $0.11 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 6.38 | | | | 1.93 | | | | 0.56 | | | | 2.96 | | | | 4.46 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $6.48 | | | | $2.02 | | | | $0.67 | | | | $3.04 | | | | $4.57 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.08 | ) | | | $(0.08 | ) | | | $(0.06 | ) | | | $(0.10 | ) | | | $— | |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $33.75 | | | | $27.35 | | | | $25.41 | | | | $24.80 | | | | $21.86 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 23.74 | | | | 8.00 | | | | 2.72 | | | | 13.93 | | | | 26.43 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.49 | | | | 1.53 | | | | 1.53 | | | | 1.55 | | | | 1.67 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.49 | | | | 1.53 | | | | 1.53 | | | | 1.55 | | | | 1.67 | |
Net investment income | | | 0.32 | | | | 0.32 | | | | 0.42 | | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.60 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 31 | | | | 37 | | | | 39 | | | | 63 | | | | 83 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $3,419 | | | | $2,942 | | | | $2,693 | | | | $2,528 | | | | $2,168 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class R4 | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $27.52 | | | | $25.57 | | | | $24.95 | | | | $21.98 | | | | $17.41 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.12 | | | | $0.14 | | | | $0.17 | | | | $0.14 | | | | $0.19 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 6.47 | | | | 1.95 | | | | 0.57 | | | | 2.97 | | | | 4.44 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $6.59 | | | | $2.09 | | | | $0.74 | | | | $3.11 | | | | $4.63 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.14 | ) | | | $(0.14 | ) | | | $(0.12 | ) | | | $(0.14 | ) | | | $(0.06 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $33.97 | | | | $27.52 | | | | $25.57 | | | | $24.95 | | | | $21.98 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 24.05 | | | | 8.28 | | | | 2.96 | | | | 14.21 | | | | 26.73 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.25 | | | | 1.28 | | | | 1.28 | | | | 1.30 | | | | 1.38 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.25 | | | | 1.28 | | | | 1.28 | | | | 1.30 | | | | 1.38 | |
Net investment income | | | 0.39 | | | | 0.51 | | | | 0.67 | | | | 0.60 | | | | 1.03 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 31 | | | | 37 | | | | 39 | | | | 63 | | | | 83 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $942 | | | | $292 | | | | $175 | | | | $171 | | | | $146 | |
| | | | |
Class R5 | | Period ended 10/31/13 (i) | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $30.79 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.15 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 3.67 | (g) |
Total from investment operations | | | $3.82 | |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $34.61 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 12.41 | (n) |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | | | | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f) | | | 1.15 | (a) |
Expenses after expense reductions (f) | | | 1.15 | (a) |
Net investment income | | | 0.68 | (a) |
Portfolio turnover | | | 31 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $112 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Financial Highlights – continued
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(g) | The per share amount is not in accordance with the net realized and unrealized gain/loss for the period because of the timing of sales of fund shares and the per share amount of realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
(i) | For the period from the class’ inception, March 1, 2013, through the stated period end. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(w) | Per share amount was less than $0.01. |
(x) | The net asset values per share and total returns have been calculated on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Business and Organization
MFS Global Growth Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust VIII (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests in foreign securities, including securities of emerging market issuers. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment. The markets of emerging markets countries are generally more volatile than the markets of developed countries with more mature economies. All of the risks of investing in foreign securities previously described are heightened when investing in emerging markets countries.
In January 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-01 (“ASU 2013-01”) entitled Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities which is intended to clarify the scope of Accounting Standards Update 2011-11 (“ASU 2011-11”), Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. Consistent with the effective date for ASU 2011-11, ASU 2013-01 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. ASU 2013-01 limits the scope of ASU 2011-11’s disclosure requirements on offsetting to financial assets and financial liabilities related to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities lending and securities borrowing transactions. Although still evaluating the potential impact of these two ASUs to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
In June 2013, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-08 Financial Services – Investment Companies (Topic 946) – Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2013-08”) which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. ASU 2013-08 sets forth a methodology for determining whether an entity should be characterized as an investment company and prescribes fair value accounting for an investment company’s non-controlling ownership interest in another investment company. FASB has determined that a fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 automatically meets ASU 2013-08’s criteria for an investment company. Although still
27
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2013-08 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
Investment Valuations – Equity securities, including restricted equity securities, are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which they are primarily traded. Equity securities, for which there were no sales reported that day, are generally valued at the last quoted daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which such securities are primarily traded. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. Events that occur on a frequent basis after foreign markets close (such as developments in foreign markets and significant movements in the U.S. markets) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value may be deemed to have a material effect on the value of securities traded in foreign markets. Accordingly, the fund’s foreign equity securities may often be valued at fair value. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the
28
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2013 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments at Value | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Equity Securities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
United States | | | $115,945,419 | | | | $— | | | | $— | | | | $115,945,419 | |
United Kingdom | | | 27,629,786 | | | | 14,434 | | | | — | | | | 27,644,220 | |
France | | | 23,941,624 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 23,941,624 | |
Switzerland | | | 15,927,578 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 15,927,578 | |
Brazil | | | 8,693,554 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 8,693,554 | |
Germany | | | 7,976,164 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,976,164 | |
Taiwan | | | 4,105,025 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,105,025 | |
South Korea | | | 3,174,345 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,174,345 | |
Denmark | | | 2,708,037 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,708,037 | |
Other Countries | | | 16,626,662 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 16,626,662 | |
Mutual Funds | | | 2,047,635 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,047,635 | |
Total Investments | | | $228,775,829 | | | | $14,434 | | | | $— | | | | $228,790,263 | |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
Repurchase Agreements – The fund entered into repurchase agreements with approved counterparties. Each repurchase agreement is recorded at cost. The fund requires that the securities collateral in a repurchase transaction be transferred to a custodian. The fund monitors, on a daily basis, the value of the collateral to ensure that its value, including accrued interest, is greater than amounts owed to the fund under each such repurchase agreement.
Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable
29
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
Security Loans – JPMorgan Chase and Co. (“Chase”), as lending agent, loans the securities of the fund to certain qualified institutions (the “Borrowers”) approved by the fund. The loans are collateralized by cash and/or U.S. Treasury and federal agency obligations in an amount typically at least equal to the market value of the securities loaned. The market value of the loaned securities is determined at the close of business of the fund and any additional required collateral is delivered to the fund on the next business day. Chase provides the fund with indemnification against Borrower default. The fund bears the risk of loss with respect to the investment of cash collateral. On loans collateralized by cash, the cash collateral is invested in repurchase agreements with approved counterparties. A portion of the income generated upon investment of the collateral is remitted to the Borrowers, and the remainder is allocated between the fund and the lending agent. On loans collateralized by U.S. Treasury and/or federal agency obligations, a fee is received from the Borrower, and is allocated between the fund and the lending agent. Income from securities lending is included in “Interest” income, in the Statement of Operations. The dividend and interest income earned on the securities loaned is accounted for in the same manner as other dividend and interest income. At October 31, 2013, there were no securities on loan or collateral outstanding.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
30
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the year ended October 31, 2013, is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period. Foreign taxes, if any, have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements in accordance with the applicable foreign tax law. Foreign income taxes may be withheld by certain countries in which the fund invests.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to wash sale loss deferrals and treating a portion of the proceeds from redemptions as a distribution for tax purposes.
The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last two fiscal years is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 10/31/13 | | | 10/31/12 | |
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | | | $460,035 | | | | $513,017 | |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
| | | | |
As of 10/31/13 | | | |
Cost of investments | | | $178,947,566 | |
Gross appreciation | | | 54,315,628 | |
Gross depreciation | | | (4,472,931 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | $49,842,697 | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | | 561,638 | |
Undistributed long-term capital gain | | | 7,101,649 | |
Other temporary differences | | | (24,835 | ) |
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution and service fees. The fund’s income, realized and unrealized gain (loss), and common expenses are allocated to
31
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B shares will convert to Class A shares approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | From net investment income | |
| | Year ended 10/31/13 | | | Year ended 10/31/12 | |
Class A | | | $410,782 | | | | $467,829 | |
Class I | | | 39,439 | | | | 35,928 | |
Class R3 | | | 8,165 | | | | 8,269 | |
Class R4 | | | 1,649 | | | | 991 | |
Total | | | $460,035 | | | | $513,017 | |
(3) Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at the following annual rates:
| | | | |
First $1 billion of average daily net assets | | | 0.90 | % |
Next $1 billion of average daily net assets | | | 0.75 | % |
Average daily net assets in excess of $2 billion | | | 0.65 | % |
Effective April 1, 2013, MFS has agreed in writing to reduce its management fee by a specified amount if certain MFS mutual fund assets exceed thresholds agreed to by MFS and the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the period April 1, 2013 through October 31, 2013, this management fee reduction amounted to $1,076, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The management fee incurred for the year ended October 31, 2013 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.90% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $32,606 for the year ended October 31, 2013, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the fund.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
32
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Distribution Fee Rate (d) | | | Service Fee Rate (d) | | | Total Distribution Plan (d) | | | Annual Effective Rate (e) | | | Distribution and Service Fee | |
Class A | | | — | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.24% | | | | $432,301 | |
Class B | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 81,214 | |
Class C | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 123,697 | |
Class R1 | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 8,826 | |
Class R2 | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.50% | | | | 0.50% | | | | 16,802 | |
Class R3 | | | — | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 7,991 | |
Total Distribution and Service Fees | | | | | | | | | | | | $670,831 | |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’s average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the year ended October 31, 2013 based on each class’s average daily net assets. Effective January 1, 2013, MFD has voluntarily agreed to rebate a portion of each class’s 0.25% service fee attributable to accounts for which MFD retains the 0.25% service fee except for accounts attributable to MFS or its affiliates’ seed money. For the period January 1, 2013 through October 31, 2013, this rebate amounted to $10,774, $170, and $322 for Class A, Class B, and Class C, respectively, and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. |
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 18 months of purchase for shares purchased on or after August 1, 2012, and within 24 months of purchase for shares purchased prior to August 1, 2012. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the year ended October 31, 2013, were as follows:
| | | | |
| | Amount | |
Class A | | | $158 | |
Class B | | | 5,578 | |
Class C | | | 583 | |
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the year ended October 31, 2013, the fee was $121,855, which equated to 0.0577% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. Class R5 shares do not incur sub-accounting fees. For the year ended October 31, 2013, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $244,129.
33
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the year ended October 31, 2013 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0177% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. Effective January 1, 2002, accrued benefits under the DB plan for then-current independent Trustees who continued were credited to an unfunded retirement deferral plan (the “Retirement Deferral plan”), which was established for and exists solely with respect to these credited amounts, and is not available for other deferrals by these or other independent Trustees. Although the Retirement Deferral plan is unfunded, amounts deferred under the plan are periodically adjusted for investment experience as if they had been invested in shares of the fund. The DB plan resulted in a pension expense of $222 and the Retirement Deferral plan resulted in an expense of $2,951. Both amounts are included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the year ended October 31, 2013. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under both plans amounted to $26,501 at October 31, 2013, and is included in “Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO, respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the year ended October 31, 2013, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $1,383 and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $541, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the
34
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” in the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
On February 28, 2013, MFS purchased 3,248 shares of Class R5 for an aggregate amount of $100,000.
At October 31, 2013, MFS held 100% of the outstanding shares of Class R5.
(4) Portfolio Securities
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $65,547,785 and $74,087,639, respectively.
(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended 10/31/13 (i) | | | Year ended 10/31/12 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares sold | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 437,447 | | | | $13,501,702 | | | | 315,156 | | | | $8,265,686 | |
Class B | | | 30,888 | | | | 862,407 | | | | 28,776 | | | | 699,415 | |
Class C | | | 53,381 | | | | 1,495,626 | | | | 56,057 | | | | 1,339,208 | |
Class I | | | 92,808 | | | | 2,894,986 | | | | 49,658 | | | | 1,359,885 | |
Class R1 | | | 9,672 | | | | 259,839 | | | | 4,603 | | | | 110,551 | |
Class R2 | | | 10,462 | | | | 310,656 | | | | 15,154 | | | | 395,137 | |
Class R3 | | | 16,228 | | | | 501,787 | | | | 17,408 | | | | 456,130 | |
Class R4 | | | 18,015 | | | | 583,883 | | | | 3,697 | | | | 98,157 | |
Class R5 | | | 3,248 | | | | 100,001 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | 672,149 | | | | $20,510,887 | | | | 490,509 | | | | $12,724,169 | |
| | | |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 13,195 | | | | $376,720 | | | | 17,944 | | | | $424,920 | |
Class I | | | 1,213 | | | | 35,254 | | | | 1,371 | | | | 33,065 | |
Class R3 | | | 287 | | | | 8,165 | | | | 350 | | | | 8,269 | |
Class R4 | | | 57 | | | | 1,649 | | | | 42 | | | | 991 | |
| | | 14,752 | | | | $421,788 | | | | 19,707 | | | | $467,245 | |
35
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended 10/31/13 (i) | | | Year ended 10/31/12 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares reacquired | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (763,418 | ) | | | $(23,241,161 | ) | | | (958,704 | ) | | | $(25,209,492 | ) |
Class B | | | (83,260 | ) | | | (2,338,583 | ) | | | (131,972 | ) | | | (3,183,439 | ) |
Class C | | | (68,159 | ) | | | (1,892,731 | ) | | | (89,650 | ) | | | (2,167,380 | ) |
Class I | | | (29,400 | ) | | | (918,370 | ) | | | (41,454 | ) | | | (1,103,756 | ) |
Class R1 | | | (11,970 | ) | | | (337,847 | ) | | | (7,308 | ) | | | (169,996 | ) |
Class R2 | | | (29,842 | ) | | | (899,240 | ) | | | (78,292 | ) | | | (1,952,000 | ) |
Class R3 | | | (22,800 | ) | | | (701,804 | ) | | | (16,184 | ) | | | (418,139 | ) |
Class R4 | | | (937 | ) | | | (29,518 | ) | | | — | | | | (12 | ) |
| | | (1,009,786 | ) | | | $(30,359,254 | ) | | | (1,323,564 | ) | | | $(34,204,214 | ) |
| | | |
Net change | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (312,776 | ) | | | $(9,362,739 | ) | | | (625,604 | ) | | | $(16,518,886 | ) |
Class B | | | (52,372 | ) | | | (1,476,176 | ) | | | (103,196 | ) | | | (2,484,024 | ) |
Class C | | | (14,778 | ) | | | (397,105 | ) | | | (33,593 | ) | | | (828,172 | ) |
Class I | | | 64,621 | | | | 2,011,870 | | | | 9,575 | | | | 289,194 | |
Class R1 | | | (2,298 | ) | | | (78,008 | ) | | | (2,705 | ) | | | (59,445 | ) |
Class R2 | | | (19,380 | ) | | | (588,584 | ) | | | (63,138 | ) | | | (1,556,863 | ) |
Class R3 | | | (6,285 | ) | | | (191,852 | ) | | | 1,574 | | | | 46,260 | |
Class R4 | | | 17,135 | | | | 556,014 | | | | 3,739 | | | | 99,136 | |
Class R5 | | | 3,248 | | | | 100,001 | | | | — | | | | — | |
| | | (322,885 | ) | | | $(9,426,579 | ) | | | (813,348 | ) | | | $(21,012,800 | ) |
(i) | For Class R5, the period is from inception, March 1, 2013, through the stated period end. |
(6) Line of Credit
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the year ended October 31, 2013, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $1,045 and $0, respectively, and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations.
36
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be an affiliated issuer:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Fund | | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | | | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | | | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | | | Ending Shares/Par Amount | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | 1,568,106 | | | | 28,017,750 | | | | (27,538,221 | ) | | | 2,047,635 | |
| | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Fund | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | | Capital Gain Distributions | | | Dividend Income | | | Ending Value | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | $— | | | | $— | | | | $1,868 | | �� | | $2,047,635 | |
37
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Trustees of MFS Series Trust VIII and the Shareholders of MFS Global Growth Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, of MFS Global Growth Fund (one of the series comprising MFS Series Trust VIII) (the “Fund”) as of October 31, 2013, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2013, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MFS Global Growth Fund as of October 31, 2013, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the periods presented, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
December 19, 2013
38
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS — IDENTIFICATION AND BACKGROUND
The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, as of December 1, 2013, are listed below, together with their principal occupations during the past five years. (Their titles may have varied during that period.) The address of each Trustee and Officer is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-7618.
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Age | | Position(s) Held with Fund | | Trustee/Officer Since (h) | | Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years | | Other Directorships (j) |
INTERESTED TRUSTEES |
Robert J. Manning (k) (age 50) | | Trustee | | February 2004 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director; President (until 2009); Chief Investment Officer (until 2010) | | N/A |
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES | | | | |
David H. Gunning (age 71) | | Trustee and Chair of Trustees | | January 2004 | | Private investor | | Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (welding equipment manufacturer), Director; Development Alternatives, Inc. (consulting), Director/Non-Executive Chairman; Portman Limited (mining), Director (until 2008) |
Robert E. Butler (age 72) | | Trustee | | January 2006 | | Consultant – investment company industry regulatory and compliance matters | | N/A |
Maureen R. Goldfarb (age 58) | | Trustee | | January 2009 | | Private investor | | N/A |
William R. Gutow (age 72) | | Trustee | | December 1993 | | Private investor and real estate consultant; Capitol Entertainment Management Company (video franchise), Vice Chairman | | Texas Donuts (donut franchise), Vice Chairman (until 2010) |
39
Trustees and Officers – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Age | | Position(s) Held with Fund | | Trustee/Officer Since (h) | | Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years | | Other Directorships (j) |
Michael Hegarty (age 68) | | Trustee | | December 2004 | | Private investor | | Brookfield Office Properties, Inc. (real estate), Director; Rouse Properties Inc. (real estate), Director; Capmark Financial Group Inc. (real estate), Director |
John P. Kavanaugh (age 59) | | Trustee | | January 2009 | | Private investor | | N/A |
J. Dale Sherratt (age 75) | | Trustee | | June 1989 | | Insight Resources, Inc. (acquisition planning specialists), President; Wellfleet Investments (investor in health care companies), Managing General Partner | | N/A |
Laurie J. Thomsen (age 56) | | Trustee | | March 2005 | | Private investor; New Profit, Inc. (venture philanthropy), Executive Partner (until 2010) | | The Travelers Companies (insurance), Director |
Robert W. Uek (age 72) | | Trustee | | January 2006 | | Consultant to investment company industry | | N/A |
OFFICERS |
John M. Corcoran (k) (age 48) | | President | | October 2008 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President (since October 2008); State Street Bank and Trust (financial services provider), Senior Vice President, (until 2008) | | N/A |
Christopher R. Bohane (k) (age 39) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | July 2005 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel | | N/A |
Kino Clark (k) (age 45) | | Assistant Treasurer | | January 2012 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President | | N/A |
40
Trustees and Officers – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Age | | Position(s) Held with Fund | | Trustee/Officer Since (h) | | Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years | | Other Directorships (j) |
Thomas H. Connors (k) (age 54) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | September 2012 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel; Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (financial service provider), Director and Senior Counsel (until 2012) | | N/A |
Ethan D. Corey (k) (age 50) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | July 2005 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel | | N/A |
David L. DiLorenzo (k) (age 45) | | Treasurer | | July 2005 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President | | N/A |
Robyn L. Griffin (age 38) | | Assistant Independent Chief Compliance Officer | | August 2008 | | Griffin Compliance LLC (provider of compliance services), Principal (since August 2008); State Street Corporation (financial services provider), Mutual Fund Administration Assistant Vice President (until 2008) | | N/A |
Brian E. Langenfeld (k) (age 40) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | June 2006 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel | | N/A |
Susan S. Newton (k) (age 63) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | May 2005 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel | | N/A |
Susan A. Pereira (k) (age 43) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | July 2005 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel | | N/A |
41
Trustees and Officers – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Age | | Position(s) Held with Fund | | Trustee/Officer Since (h) | | Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years | | Other Directorships (j) |
Kasey L. Phillips (k) (age 42) | | Assistant Treasurer | | September 2012 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President; Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, Senior Vice President, Fund Treasurer (until 2012) | | N/A |
Mark N. Polebaum (k) (age 61) | | Secretary and Clerk | | January 2006 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | | N/A |
Frank L. Tarantino (age 69) | | Independent Chief Compliance Officer | | June 2004 | | Tarantino LLC (provider of compliance services), Principal | | N/A |
Richard S. Weitzel (k) (age 43) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | October 2007 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel | | N/A |
James O. Yost (k) (age 53) | | Deputy Treasurer | | September 1990 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President | | N/A |
(h) | Date first appointed to serve as Trustee/officer of an MFS Fund. Each Trustee has served continuously since appointment unless indicated otherwise. For the period from December 15, 2004 until February 22, 2005, Mr. Manning served as Advisory Trustee. For the period October 2008, until January 2012, Mr. Corcoran served as Treasurer of the Funds. Prior to January 2012, Messrs. DiLorenzo and Yost served as Assistant Treasurers of the Funds. |
(j) | Directorships or trusteeships of companies required to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (i.e., “public companies”). |
(k) | “Interested person” of the Trust within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (referred to as the 1940 Act), which is the principal federal law governing investment companies like the fund, as a result of position with MFS. The address of MFS is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-7618. |
Each Trustee has been elected by shareholders and each Trustee and officer holds office until his or her successor is chosen and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal. The Trust does not hold annual meetings for the purpose of electing Trustees, and Trustees are not elected for fixed terms. Messrs. Butler, Kavanaugh, Uek and Ms. Thomsen are members of the Trust’s Audit Committee.
Each of the Fund’s Trustees and officers holds comparable positions with certain other funds of which MFS or a subsidiary is the investment adviser or distributor, and, in the case of the officers, with certain affiliates of MFS. As of January 1, 2013, the Trustees served as board members of 143 funds within the MFS Family of Funds.
42
Trustees and Officers – continued
The Statement of Additional Information for the Fund includes further information about the Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling 1-800-225-2606.
| | |
Investment Adviser | | Custodian |
Massachusetts Financial Services Company 111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199-7618 | | JPMorgan Chase Bank One Chase Manhattan Plaza New York, NY 10081 |
Distributor | | Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. 111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199-7618 | | Deloitte & Touche LLP 200 Berkeley Street Boston, MA 02116 |
Portfolio Managers | | |
David Antonelli | | |
Jeffery Constantino | | |
43
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2013 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2012 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to
44
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 3rd quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 3rd quintile for the one-year period and the 2nd quintile for the five-year period ended December 31, 2012 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each approximately at the Lipper expense group median.
45
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to any comparable institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund may benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund and/or growth in assets of the MFS Funds as a whole. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is subject to contractual breakpoints that reduce the Fund’s advisory fee rate on average daily net assets over $1 billion and $2 billion. The Trustees also noted that MFS has agreed in writing to waive a portion of the management fees of certain MFS Funds, including the Fund, if the total combined assets of certain funds within the MFS Funds’ complex increase above agreed upon thresholds (the “group fee waiver”), enabling the Fund’s shareholders to share in the benefits from any economies of scale at the complex level. The group fee waiver is reviewed and renewed annually between the Board and MFS. The Trustees concluded that the existing breakpoints and the group fee waiver were sufficient to allow the Fund to benefit from economies of scale as its assets and overall complex assets grow.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., an affiliate of MFS. The Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS
46
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2013.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
47
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
FURTHER INFORMATION
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products” section of mfs.com.
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (unaudited)
The fund will notify shareholders of amounts for use in preparing 2013 income tax forms in January 2014. The following information is provided pursuant to provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
The fund designates the maximum amount allowable as qualified dividend income eligible for the 15% tax rate. The fund designates $445,058 as capital gain dividends paid during the fiscal year. For corporate shareholders, 100% of the ordinary income dividends paid during the fiscal year qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction.
48
rev. 3/11
| | | | |
| | |
FACTS | | WHAT DOES MFS DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? | | ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616719logo_07.jpg) |
| | |
Why? | | Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do. |
| | |
What? | | The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include: • Social Security number and account balances • Account transactions and transaction history • Checking account information and wire transfer instructions When you are no longer our customer, we continue to share your information as described in this notice. |
| | |
How? | | All financial companies need to share customers’ personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers’ personal information; the reasons MFS chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. |
| | | | |
Reasons we can share your personal information | | Does MFS share? | | Can you limit this sharing? |
For our everyday business purposes – such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus | | Yes | | No |
For our marketing purposes – to offer our products and services to you | | No | | We don’t share |
For joint marketing with other financial companies | | No | | We don’t share |
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your transactions and experiences | | No | | We don’t share |
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your creditworthiness | | No | | We don’t share |
For nonaffiliates to market to you | | No | | We don’t share |
| | |
Questions? | | Call 800-225-2606 or go to mfs.com. |
49
| | |
Who we are |
Who is providing this notice? | | MFS Funds, MFS Investment Management, MFS Institutional Advisors, Inc., MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., MFS Heritage Trust Company, and MFS Service Center, Inc. |
| | |
What we do |
How does MFS protect my personal information? | | To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include procedural, electronic, and physical safeguards for the protection of the personal information we collect about you. |
How does MFS collect my personal information? | | We collect your personal information, for example, when you •open an account or provide account information •direct us to buy securities or direct us to sell your securities •make a wire transfer We also collect your personal information from others, such as credit bureaus, affiliates and other companies. |
Why can’t I limit all sharing? | | Federal law gives you the right to limit only •sharing for affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your creditworthiness •affiliates from using your information to market to you •sharing for nonaffiliates to market to you State laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing. |
| | |
Definitions |
Affiliates | | Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. •MFS does not share personal information with affiliates, except for everyday business purposes as described on page one of this notice. |
Nonaffiliates | | Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. •MFS does not share with nonaffiliates so they can market to you. |
Joint Marketing | | A formal agreement between nonaffiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you. •MFS doesn’t jointly market. |
| | |
Other important information |
If you own an MFS product or receive an MFS service in the name of a third party such as a bank or broker-dealer, their privacy policy may apply to you instead of ours. |
50
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616719logo_03.jpg)
Save paper with eDelivery.
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616719art_04.jpg)
| MFS® will send you prospectuses, |
reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter.
To sign up:
1. Go to mfs.com.
2. Log in via MFS® Access.
3. Select eDelivery.
If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS® Access, or eDelivery may not be available to you.
CONTACT
WEB SITE
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
ACCOUNT SERVICE AND LITERATURE
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Financial advisors
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
MAILING ADDRESS
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
OVERNIGHT MAIL
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
ANNUAL REPORT
October 31, 2013
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616727logo_03.jpg)
MFS® STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616727art_03.jpg)
MFO-ANN
MFS® STRATEGIC INCOME FUND
CONTENTS
The report is prepared for the general information of shareholders.
It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
NOT FDIC INSURED Ÿ MAY LOSE VALUE Ÿ NO BANK GUARANTEE
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616727manning_photo.jpg)
LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO
Dear Shareholders:
The global economy is trending toward growth again despite risks created by the U.S. government’s gridlock. The eurozone has emerged from its 18-month-long recession.
However, unemployment in the region persists at historically high levels. The U.K. economy is on the rebound. China’s economic gauges are improving and point toward expansion. And Japan’s aggressive program of monetary easing is showing signs of success.
The U.S. Federal Reserve’s expected tapering of its bond-buying stimulus program — telegraphed in the spring and delayed in September — has weighed on global markets. Emerging markets have borne much of the brunt, with currency values dropping and nervous investors seeking safety elsewhere. The greatest
threat to global economic recovery now appears to be related to the U.S. government’s impasse. While the tensions surrounding the 16-day government shutdown and potential U.S. debt default have dissipated, another round of potential gridlock lies ahead early in 2014, with the next U.S. budget and debt ceiling deadlines.
As always, managing risk in the face of uncertainty remains a top priority for investors. At MFS®, our uniquely collaborative investment process employs integrated, global research and active risk management. Our global team of investment professionals shares ideas and evaluates opportunities across continents, investment disciplines and asset classes — all with a goal of building better insights, and ultimately better results, for our clients.
We are mindful of the many economic challenges investors face, and believe it is more important than ever to maintain a long-term view and employ time-tested principles, such as asset allocation and diversification. We remain confident that our unique approach can serve investors well as they work with their financial advisors to identify and pursue the most suitable opportunities.
Respectfully,
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616727manning_sig.jpg)
Robert J. Manning
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
MFS Investment Management®
December 16, 2013
The opinions expressed in this letter are subject to change, may not be relied upon for investment advice, and no forecasts can be guaranteed.
1
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
Portfolio structure (i)
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616727g77h11.jpg)
| | | | |
Fixed income sectors (i) | |
High Grade Corporates | | | 45.3% | |
High Yield Corporates | | | 32.6% | |
Non-U.S. Government Bonds | | | 10.1% | |
Emerging Markets Bonds | | | 8.3% | |
Mortgage-Backed Securities | | | 0.8% | |
Floating Rate Loans | | | 0.6% | |
Asset-Backed Securities | | | 0.4% | |
Municipal Bonds | | | 0.4% | |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | | | 0.3% | |
Collateralized Debt Obligations | | | 0.2% | |
U.S. Government Agencies | | | 0.1% | |
U.S. Treasury Securities | | | (8.8)% | |
| | | | |
Composition including fixed income credit quality (a)(i) | |
AAA | | | 2.4% | |
AA | | | 4.4% | |
A | | | 19.4% | |
BBB | | | 36.0% | |
BB | | | 15.0% | |
B | | | 15.0% | |
CCC | | | 5.4% | |
CC (o) | | | 0.0% | |
C | | | 0.1% | |
Federal Agencies | | | 0.9% | |
Not Rated | | | (8.3)% | |
Non-Fixed Income | | | 0.2% | |
Cash & Other | | | 9.5% | |
|
Issuer country weightings (i)(x) | |
United States | | | 64.2% | |
United Kingdom | | | 4.1% | |
France | | | 3.3% | |
Italy | | | 2.9% | |
Netherlands | | | 2.8% | |
Canada | | | 2.2% | |
Russia | | | 2.0% | |
Japan | | | 2.0% | |
Germany | | | 1.8% | |
Other Countries | | | 14.7% | |
|
Portfolio facts (i) | |
Average Duration (d) | | | 4.6 | |
Average Effective Maturity (m) | | | 7.5 yrs. | |
2
Portfolio Composition – continued
(a) | For all securities other than those specifically described below, ratings are assigned to underlying securities utilizing ratings from Moody’s, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s rating agencies and applying the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). Securities rated BBB or higher are considered investment grade. All ratings are subject to change. Federal Agencies includes rated and unrated U.S. Agency fixed-income securities, U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations of U.S. Agency mortgage-backed securities. Not Rated includes fixed income securities, including fixed income futures contracts, which have not been rated by any rating agency. Non-Fixed Income includes equity securities (including convertible bonds and equity derivatives) and commodities. Cash & Other includes cash, other assets less liabilities, offsets to derivative positions, and short-term securities. The fund may not hold all of these instruments. The fund is not rated by these agencies. |
(d) | Duration is a measure of how much a bond’s price is likely to fluctuate with general changes in interest rates, e.g., if rates rise 1.00%, a bond with a 5-year duration is likely to lose about 5.00% of its value due to the interest rate move. |
(i) | For purposes of this presentation, the components include the market value of securities, and reflect the impact of the equivalent exposure of derivative positions, if any. These amounts may be negative from time to time. Equivalent exposure is a calculated amount that translates the derivative position into a reasonable approximation of the amount of the underlying asset that the portfolio would have to hold at a given point in time to have the same price sensitivity that results from the portfolio’s ownership of the derivative contract. When dealing with derivatives, equivalent exposure is a more representative measure of the potential impact of a position on portfolio performance than market value. The bond component will include any accrued interest amounts. |
(m) | In determining an instrument’s effective maturity for purposes of calculating the fund’s dollar-weighted average effective maturity, MFS uses the instrument’s stated maturity or, if applicable, an earlier date on which MFS believes it is probable that a maturity-shortening device (such as a put, pre-refunding or prepayment) will cause the instrument to be repaid. Such an earlier date can be substantially shorter than the instrument’s stated maturity. |
(x) | Represents the portfolio’s exposure to issuer countries as a percentage of a portfolio’s net assets. |
Where the fund holds convertible bonds, these are treated as part of the equity portion of the portfolio.
The fund invests a portion of its assets in the MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio. Percentages reflect exposure to the underlying holdings of the MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio and not to the exposure from investing directly in the MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio itself.
Percentages are based on net assets as of 10/31/13.
The portfolio is actively managed and current holdings may be different.
3
MANAGEMENT REVIEW
Summary of Results
For the twelve months ended October 31, 2013, Class A shares of the MFS Strategic Income Fund (“fund”) provided a total return of 1.85%, at net asset value. This compares with a return of 8.86% for the fund’s benchmark, the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index. Over the same period, the fund’s other benchmark, the MFS Strategic Income Blended Index (“Blended Index”), generated a return of 2.02%. The Blended Index reflects the blended returns of various fixed income market indices, with percentage allocations to each index designed to resemble the fixed income allocations of the fund. The market indices and related percentage allocations used to compile the Blended Index are set forth in the Performance Summary.
Market Environment
At the beginning of the period, year-end fiscal cliff negotiations between the Republicans in the US Congress and President Obama were a particular source of market attention, where uncertainty surrounding the fiscal negotiations continued right up to the end-of-year deadline. A last minute political agreement averted the worst-case scenario and markets gravitated towards risk assets again, though the implementation of the US budget sequester, combined with concerns surrounding the Italian election results, was a source of uncertainty which lingered throughout the first half of the period.
The more dominant features of the first few months of 2013 included a marked improvement in market sentiment as global macroeconomic indicators improved, monetary easing by the Bank of Japan accelerated and fears of fiscal austerity in the US waned. In the middle of the period, concerns that the US Federal Reserve (Fed) would begin tapering its quantitative easing (QE) program caused sovereign bond yields to spike, credit spreads to widen, and equity valuations to fall.
Toward the end of the period, the Fed’s decision to postpone QE tapering surprised markets. Favorable market reactions were tempered, however, by tense negotiations over US fiscal policy which resulted in a 16-day partial shutdown of the federal government and a short-term extension in the debt ceiling. The volatility was short-lived, however, as an extension of budget and debt ceiling deadlines allowed the government to re-open, and subsequent economic data reflected moderate but resilient US growth. Also well-received was the decision by the European Central Bank to cut its policy rate as inflation pressures waned in the region. In addition, equity investors appeared to have concluded that there would be no major change in US monetary policy as a result of the nomination of Janet Yellen as the new Fed Chair for a term beginning in early 2014.
Detractors from Performance
Relative to the Blended Index, the fund’s greater exposure to “BBB” and above rated (r) securities dampened performance as these credit quality segments underperformed high yield during the reporting period.
4
Management Review – continued
Yield curve (y) positioning in the Asia Pacific region, particularly to Japanese debt and the fund’s lesser exposure to shifts in the long end (centered around maturities of 10 or more years) of the yield curve, weighed on performance as rates in the region declined during the reporting period.
The fund’s return from yield, which was less than that of the Blended Index, was an additional negative factor for relative performance.
Contributors to Performance
Relative to the Blended Index, the fund’s greater exposure to the financial and mortgage sectors benefited performance as both sectors outperformed the index during the reporting period.
The fund’s lesser exposure to emerging markets debt, particularly to Indonesia, Turkey, Mexico, and Venezuela, helped results as this market segment turned in poor performance over the reporting period.
Despite the negative impact from exposure to Japanese debt, the fund’s overall yield curve positioning, particularly the lesser exposure to shifts in the long end of the yield curve, was an area of relative strength as the curve widened.
Respectfully,
| | | | |
William Adams | | Ward Brown | | James Calmas |
Portfolio Manager | | Portfolio Manager | | Portfolio Manager |
| | |
David Cole | | Robert Persons | | Matthew Ryan |
Portfolio Manager | | Portfolio Manager | | Portfolio Manager |
| | |
Erik Weisman | | | | |
Portfolio Manager | | | | |
Note to Shareholders: Effective April 30, 2013, Ward Brown is also a Portfolio Manager of the Fund.
(r) | Bonds rated “BBB”, “Baa”, or higher are considered investment grade; bonds rated “BB”, “Ba”, or below are considered non-investment grade. The source for bond quality ratings is Moody’s Investors Service, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch, Inc. and are applied using the following hierarchy: If all three agencies provide a rating, the middle rating (after dropping the highest and lowest ratings) is assigned; if two of the three agencies rate a security, the lower of the two is assigned. Ratings are shown in the S&P and Fitch scale (e.g., AAA). For securities which are not rated by any of the three agencies, the security is considered Not Rated. |
(y) | A yield curve graphically depicts the yields of different maturity bonds of the same credit quality and type; a normal yield curve is upward sloping, with short-term rates lower than long-term rates. |
The views expressed in this report are those of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover and do not necessarily reflect the views of MFS or any other person in the MFS organization. These views are subject to change at any time based on market or other conditions, and MFS disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice or an indication of trading intent on behalf of any MFS portfolio. References to specific securities are not recommendations of such securities, and may not be representative of any MFS portfolio’s current or future investments.
5
PERFORMANCE SUMMARY THROUGH 10/31/13
The following chart illustrates a representative class of the fund’s historical performance in comparison to its benchmark(s). Performance results include the deduction of the maximum applicable sales charge and reflect the percentage change in net asset value, including reinvestment of dividends and capital gains distributions. The performance of other share classes will be greater than or less than that of the class depicted below. Benchmarks are unmanaged and may not be invested in directly. Benchmark returns do not reflect sales charges, commissions or expenses. (See Notes to Performance Summary.)
Performance data shown represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate so your shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than the original cost; current performance may be lower or higher than quoted. The performance shown does not reflect the deduction of taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
Growth of a Hypothetical $10,000 Investment
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616727g56w13.jpg)
6
Performance Summary – continued
Total Returns through 10/31/13
Average annual without sales charge
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Share class | | Class inception date | | 1-yr | | 5-yr | | 10-yr | | |
| | A | | 10/29/87 | | 1.85% | | 10.29% | | 5.98% | | |
| | B | | 9/07/93 | | 1.22% | | 9.52% | | 5.28% | | |
| | C | | 9/01/94 | | 1.21% | | 9.58% | | 5.29% | | |
| | I | | 1/08/97 | | 2.25% | | 10.57% | | 6.28% | | |
Comparative benchmarks | | | | | | | | |
| | Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index (f) | | 8.86% | | 18.15% | | 8.90% | | |
| | MFS Strategic Income Blended Index (f)(w) | | 2.02% | | 10.91% | | 6.81% | | |
| | Barclays U.S. Credit Bond Index (f) | | (1.58)% | | 10.16% | | 5.45% | | |
| | Barclays U.S. Government/Mortgage Bond Index (f) | | (0.95)% | | 4.62% | | 4.61% | | |
| | Citigroup World Government Bond Non-Dollar Hedged Index (f) | | 2.98% | | 4.18% | | 4.41% | | |
| | Citigroup World Government Bond Non-Dollar Index (f) | | (3.75)% | | 5.05% | | 5.06% | | |
| | JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global (f) | | (2.58)% | | 14.15% | | 8.94% | | |
Average annual with sales charge | | | | | | | | |
| | A
With Initial Sales Charge (4.75%) | | (2.99)% | | 9.22% | | 5.46% | | |
| | B
With CDSC (Declining over six years from 4% to 0%) (v) | | (2.68)% | | 9.24% | | 5.28% | | |
| | C
With CDSC (1% for 12 months) (v) | | 0.23% | | 9.58% | | 5.29% | | |
CDSC – Contingent Deferred Sales Charge.
Class I shares do not have a sales charge.
(f) | Source: FactSet Research Systems Inc. |
(v) | Assuming redemption at the end of the applicable period. |
(w) | MFS Strategic Income Blended Index is at a point in time and allocations during the period can change. As of October 31, 2013 the blended index was comprised of 10% Barclays U.S. Credit Bond Index, 33% Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index, 14% JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global, 8.5% Citigroup World Government Bond Non-Dollar Hedged Index, 8.5% Citigroup World Government Bond Non-Dollar Index, and 26% Barclays U.S. Government/Mortgage Bond Index. |
Benchmark Definitions
Barclays U.S. Credit Bond Index – a market capitalization-weighted index that measures the performance of publicly issued, SEC-registered, U.S. corporate and specified foreign debentures and secured notes that meet specified maturity, liquidity, and quality requirements.
7
Performance Summary – continued
Barclays U.S. Government/Mortgage Bond Index – measures debt issued by the U.S. Government, and its agencies, as well as mortgage-backed pass-through securities of Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Fannie Mae (FNMA), and Freddie Mac (FHLMC).
Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond 2% Issuer Capped Index – a component of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate Bond Index, which measures performance of non-investment grade, fixed rate debt. The index limits the maximum exposure to any one issuer to 2%.
Citigroup World Government Bond Non-Dollar Hedged Index – a market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to represent the currency-hedged performance of the international developed government bond markets, excluding the United States.
Citigroup World Government Bond Non-Dollar Index – a market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to represent the performance of the international developed government bond markets, excluding the United States.
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global – measures the performance of U.S.-dollar-denominated debt instruments issued by emerging market sovereign and quasi-sovereign entities: Brady bonds, loans, Eurobonds.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
Notes to Performance Summary
Average annual total return represents the average annual change in value for each share class for the periods presented.
Performance results reflect any applicable expense subsidies and waivers in effect during the periods shown. Without such subsidies and waivers the fund’s performance results would be less favorable. Please see the prospectus and financial statements for complete details.
Performance results do not include adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and may differ from amounts reported in the financial highlights.
From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower.
8
EXPENSE TABLE
Fund expenses borne by the shareholders during the period, May 1, 2013 through October 31, 2013
As a shareholder of the funds, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including sales charges (loads) on certain purchase or redemption payments, and (2) ongoing costs, including distribution and service (12b-1) fees; and other fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
In addition to the fees and expenses which the fund bears directly, the fund indirectly bears a pro rata share of the fees and expenses of the underlying MFS Pooled Portfolio in which the fund invests. MFS Pooled Portfolios are mutual funds advised by MFS that do not pay management fees to MFS but do incur investment and operating costs. If these transactional and indirect costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period May 1, 2013 through October 31, 2013.
Actual Expenses
The first line for each share class in the following tables provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The second line for each share class in the following tables provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on each fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not each fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in each fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the tables are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as sales charges (loads). Therefore, the second line for each share class in the tables is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
9
Expense Table – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Share Class | | | | Annualized Expense Ratio | | | Beginning Account Value 5/01/13 | | | Ending Account Value 10/31/13 | | | Expenses Paid During Period (p) 5/01/13-10/31/13 | |
A | | Actual | | | 1.04% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $993.76 | | | | $5.23 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.04% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.96 | | | | $5.30 | |
B | | Actual | | | 1.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $989.82 | | | | $9.03 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.13 | | | | $9.15 | |
C | | Actual | | | 1.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $991.17 | | | | $9.03 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 1.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,016.13 | | | | $9.15 | |
I | | Actual | | | 0.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $995.00 | | | | $4.02 | |
| Hypothetical (h) | | | 0.80% | | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,021.17 | | | | $4.08 | |
(h) | 5% class return per year before expenses. |
(p) | Expenses paid are equal to each class’s annualized expense ratio, as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the period, divided by the number of days in the year. Expenses paid do not include any applicable sales charges (loads). If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher. In addition to the fees and expenses which the funds bear directly, the funds indirectly bear a pro rata share of the fees and expenses of the underlying funds in which the funds invest. If these indirect costs were included, your costs would have been higher. |
Notes to Expense Table
Each class with a Rule 12b-1 service fee is subject to a rebate of a portion of such fee. Such rebates are included in the expense ratios above and are outside of the expense limitation arrangement. For Class A shares, this rebate reduced the expense ratio above by 0.01%. See Note 3 in the Notes to Financial Statements for additional information.
10
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
10/31/13
The Portfolio of Investments is a complete list of all securities owned by your fund. It is categorized by broad-based asset classes.
| | | | | | | | |
Bonds - 63.8% | | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Asset-Backed & Securitized - 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
Anthracite Ltd., “A”, CDO, FRN, 0.53%, 2019 (n) | | $ | 47,772 | | | $ | 47,568 | |
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.771%, 2040 (z) | | | 418,265 | | | | 201,135 | |
Capital Trust Realty Ltd., CDO, 5.16%, 2035 (n) | | | 96,657 | | | | 99,113 | |
Credit Suisse Commercial Mortgage Trust, “A4”, FRN, 5.761%, 2039 | | | 638,126 | | | | 709,168 | |
Crest Ltd., CDO, 7%, 2040 (a)(p) | | | 509,967 | | | | 25,498 | |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 8.73%, 2023 (i)(z) | | | 698,907 | | | | 73,385 | |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 12.468%, 2025 (i)(z) | | | 287,447 | | | | 43,117 | |
First Union-Lehman Brothers Bank of America, FRN, 0.578%, 2035 (i) | | | 4,651,024 | | | | 93,327 | |
Hertz Vehicle Financing LLC, 2010-1A, “A1”, 2.6%, 2015 (n) | | | 206,667 | | | | 207,462 | |
HLSS Servicer Advance Receivables Trust, 2013-T1, “A2”, 1.495%, 2046 (n) | | | 970,000 | | | | 963,986 | |
KKR Financial CLO Ltd., “C”, FRN, 1.714%, 2021 (n) | | | 523,730 | | | | 493,259 | |
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.403%, 2039 (i)(z) | | | 2,573,721 | | | | 52,813 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,009,831 | |
Automotive - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Daimler Finance North America LLC, 1.875%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 1,257,000 | | | $ | 1,250,162 | |
| | |
Biotechnology - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Life Technologies Corp., 6%, 2020 | | $ | 960,000 | | | $ | 1,099,500 | |
| | |
Broadcasting - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
CBS Corp., 5.75%, 2020 | | $ | 260,000 | | | $ | 294,713 | |
Globo Comunicacoes e Participacoes S.A., 6.25% to 2015, 9.375% to 2049 (n) | | | 100,000 | | | | 105,000 | |
Myriad International Holdings B.V., 6.375%, 2017 (n) | | | 271,000 | | | | 297,423 | |
Myriad International Holdings B.V., 6%, 2020 (n) | | | 524,000 | | | | 558,060 | |
News America, Inc., 8.5%, 2025 | | | 415,000 | | | | 533,623 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,788,819 | |
Brokerage & Asset Managers - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Blackstone Holdings Finance Co. LLC, 4.75%, 2023 (n) | | $ | 940,000 | | | $ | 994,643 | |
TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., 5.6%, 2019 | | | 1,045,000 | | | | 1,221,883 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,216,526 | |
11
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Building - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
CRH PLC, 8.125%, 2018 | | $ | 590,000 | | | $ | 721,709 | |
Owens Corning, Inc., 4.2%, 2022 | | | 385,000 | | | | 382,300 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,104,009 | |
Business Services - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Tencent Holdings Ltd., 3.375%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 490,000 | | | $ | 499,582 | |
| | |
Cable TV - 1.0% | | | | | | | | |
Cox Communications, Inc., 3.25%, 2022 (n) | | $ | 1,138,000 | | | $ | 1,045,168 | |
DIRECTV Holdings LLC, 5.875%, 2019 | | | 370,000 | | | | 418,802 | |
NBCUniversal Enterprise, Inc., 1.974%, 2019 (n) | | | 618,000 | | | | 609,585 | |
Time Warner Cable, Inc., 8.25%, 2019 | | | 920,000 | | | | 1,078,512 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,152,067 | |
Chemicals - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Dow Chemical Co., 8.55%, 2019 | | $ | 1,410,000 | | | $ | 1,824,952 | |
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile S.A., 5.5%, 2020 (n) | | | 347,000 | | | | 355,638 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,180,590 | |
Computer Software - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Oracle Corp., 5.375%, 2040 | | $ | 607,000 | | | $ | 663,405 | |
| | |
Computer Software - Systems - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Seagate HDD Cayman, 3.75%, 2018 (z) | | $ | 416,000 | | | $ | 416,000 | |
| | |
Conglomerates - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Metalloinvest Finance Ltd., 5.625%, 2020 (n) | | $ | 207,000 | | | $ | 205,965 | |
| | |
Consumer Products - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
Mattel, Inc., 5.45%, 2041 | | $ | 478,000 | | | $ | 483,717 | |
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 2.05%, 2017 | | | 437,000 | | | | 434,610 | |
Newell Rubbermaid, Inc., 4.7%, 2020 | | | 570,000 | | | | 609,389 | |
Tupperware Brands Corp., 4.75%, 2021 | | | 485,000 | | | | 500,336 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,028,052 | |
Consumer Services - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Experian Finance PLC, 2.375%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 353,000 | | | $ | 351,590 | |
| | |
Defense Electronics - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 5.2%, 2015 (n) | | $ | 1,297,000 | | | $ | 1,382,095 | |
BAE Systems Holdings, Inc., 6.375%, 2019 (n) | | | 380,000 | | | | 445,542 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,827,637 | |
12
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Electrical Equipment - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Arrow Electronics, Inc., 3%, 2018 | | $ | 344,000 | | | $ | 350,418 | |
Ericsson, Inc., 4.125%, 2022 | | | 670,000 | | | | 666,302 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,016,720 | |
Electronics - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Tyco Electronics Group S.A., 3.5%, 2022 | | $ | 275,000 | | | $ | 267,613 | |
| | |
Emerging Market Quasi-Sovereign - 3.5% | | | | | | | | |
Banco de Reservas de La Republica Dominicana, 7%, 2023 (n) | | $ | 218,000 | | | $ | 207,645 | |
Banco do Nordeste do Brasil (BNB), 4.375%, 2019 (n) | | | 254,000 | | | | 248,412 | |
CNOOC Finance (2012) Ltd., 3.875%, 2022 (n) | | | 204,000 | | | | 201,342 | |
CNPC (HK) Overseas Capital Ltd., 4.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 494,000 | | | | 513,285 | |
Comision Federal de Electricidad, 5.75%, 2042 (n) | | | 639,000 | | | | 607,849 | |
Gaz Capital S.A., 3.85%, 2020 (n) | | | 721,000 | | | | 702,975 | |
Gaz Capital S.A., 5.999%, 2021 (n) | | | 570,000 | | | | 608,475 | |
Gaz Capital S.A., 4.95%, 2028 (n) | | | 615,000 | | | | 556,575 | |
Gazprom Neft, 4.375%, 2022 (n) | | | 201,000 | | | | 189,191 | |
Instituto Costarricense, 6.375%, 2043 (n) | | | 208,000 | | | | 185,120 | |
Korea Gas Corp., 2.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 700,000 | | | | 702,207 | |
Pertamina PT, 6%, 2042 (n) | | | 201,000 | | | | 177,885 | |
Petrobras Global Finance Co., 4.375%, 2023 | | | 63,000 | | | | 58,218 | |
Petrobras International Finance Co., 7.875%, 2019 | | | 494,000 | | | | 575,383 | |
Petrobras International Finance Co., 6.75%, 2041 | | | 414,000 | | | | 409,053 | |
Petroleos Mexicanos, 5.5%, 2021 | | | 542,000 | | | | 590,780 | |
Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.875%, 2022 | | | 344,000 | | | | 357,760 | |
Petroleos Mexicanos, 6.5%, 2041 | | | 292,000 | | | | 310,980 | |
PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara, 5.5%, 2021 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 201,000 | |
PTT PLC, 3.375%, 2022 (n) | | | 331,000 | | | | 309,030 | |
PTT PLC, 4.5%, 2042 (n) | | | 354,000 | | | | 299,109 | |
Ras Laffan Liquefied Natural Gas Co. Ltd., 5.832%, 2016 (n) | | | 460,130 | | | | 490,038 | |
Rosneft, 3.149%, 2017 (n) | | | 432,000 | | | | 435,240 | |
Rosneft, 4.199%, 2022 (n) | | | 719,000 | | | | 674,063 | |
Sberbank of Russia, 6.125%, 2022 (n) | | | 285,000 | | | | 308,869 | |
Sinopec Capital (2013) Ltd., 3.125%, 2023 (n) | | | 518,000 | | | | 475,112 | |
Sinopec Capital (2013) Ltd., 4.25%, 2043 (n) | | | 426,000 | | | | 368,980 | |
Sinopec Group Overseas Development (2012) Ltd., 3.9%, 2022 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 197,662 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 10,962,238 | |
Emerging Market Sovereign - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Oriental Republic of Uruguay, 4.5%, 2024 | | $ | 86,000 | | | $ | 88,795 | |
Republic of Colombia, 6.125%, 2041 | | | 210,000 | | | | 237,825 | |
Republic of Hungary, 5.375%, 2023 | | | 82,000 | | | | 81,676 | |
Republic of Indonesia, 4.875%, 2021 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 207,500 | |
Republic of Philippines, 5.5%, 2026 | | | 200,000 | | | | 229,000 | |
13
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Emerging Market Sovereign - continued | | | | | | | | |
Republic of Philippines, 6.375%, 2034 | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 364,500 | |
Republic of Romania, 4.375%, 2023 (n) | | | 60,000 | | | | 58,725 | |
Republic of Slovakia, 4.375%, 2022 (n) | | | 600,000 | | | | 630,000 | |
Russian Federation, 4.875%, 2023 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 209,800 | |
Russian Federation, 5.625%, 2042 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 208,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,315,821 | |
Energy - Independent - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
EQT Corp., 4.875%, 2021 | | $ | 431,000 | | | $ | 447,275 | |
Hess Corp., 8.125%, 2019 | | | 270,000 | | | | 340,204 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 787,479 | |
Energy - Integrated - 1.2% | | | | | | | | |
BP Capital Markets PLC, 4.5%, 2020 | | $ | 272,000 | | | $ | 298,279 | |
BP Capital Markets PLC, 4.742%, 2021 | | | 760,000 | | | | 839,157 | |
LUKOIL International Finance B.V., 3.416%, 2018 (n) | | | 571,000 | | | | 575,283 | |
LUKOIL International Finance B.V., 4.563%, 2023 (n) | | | 784,000 | | | | 749,700 | |
Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., 7.25%, 2021 (n) | | | 401,000 | | | | 441,100 | |
Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp., 5.125%, 2023 (n) | | | 100,000 | | | | 95,750 | |
Petro-Canada Financial Partnership, 5%, 2014 | | | 860,000 | | | | 896,940 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 3,896,209 | |
Financial Institutions - 1.5% | | | | | | | | |
General Electric Capital Corp., 6%, 2019 | | $ | 300,000 | | | $ | 355,048 | |
General Electric Capital Corp., 5.5%, 2020 | | | 710,000 | | | | 821,327 | |
General Electric Capital Corp., 3.15%, 2022 | | | 813,000 | | | | 796,153 | |
General Electric Capital Corp., 3.1%, 2023 | | | 508,000 | | | | 489,697 | |
LeasePlan Corp. N.V., 3%, 2017 (n) | | | 870,000 | | | | 881,658 | |
LeasePlan Corp. N.V., 2.5%, 2018 (n) | | | 286,000 | | | | 281,880 | |
NYSE Euronext, 2%, 2017 | | | 714,000 | | | | 717,729 | |
TMK Capital S.A., 6.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 414,000 | | | | 404,685 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,748,177 | |
Food & Beverages - 2.8% | | | | | | | | |
Anheuser-Busch InBev S.A., 7.75%, 2019 | | $ | 1,100,000 | | | $ | 1,393,063 | |
BRF S.A., 3.95%, 2023 (n) | | | 994,000 | | | | 894,600 | |
Coca-Cola Icecek Uretim, 4.75%, 2018 (n) | | | 237,000 | | | | 246,101 | |
Conagra Foods, Inc., 3.2%, 2023 | | | 743,000 | | | | 708,937 | |
Embotelladora Andina S.A., 5%, 2023 (n) | | | 200,000 | | | | 205,605 | |
Grupo Bimbo S.A.B. de C.V., 4.5%, 2022 (n) | | | 101,000 | | | | 103,130 | |
Kraft Foods Group, Inc., 6.125%, 2018 | | | 720,000 | | | | 850,522 | |
Mead Johnson Nutrition Co., “A”, 4.9%, 2019 | | | 263,000 | | | | 291,559 | |
Pernod Ricard S.A., 5.75%, 2021 (n) | | | 594,000 | | | | 665,700 | |
SABMiller Holdings, Inc., 3.75%, 2022 (n) | | | 904,000 | | | | 926,866 | |
Tyson Foods, Inc., 6.6%, 2016 | | | 560,000 | | | | 628,678 | |
14
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Food & Beverages - continued | | | | | | | | |
Tyson Foods, Inc., 4.5%, 2022 | | $ | 448,000 | | | $ | 464,648 | |
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co., 2.4%, 2018 (n) | | | 343,000 | | | | 346,619 | |
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co., 3.375%, 2020 (n) | | | 1,051,000 | | | | 1,073,281 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 8,799,309 | |
Forest & Paper Products - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Georgia-Pacific LLC, 3.734%, 2023 (n) | | $ | 1,092,000 | | | $ | 1,078,867 | |
| | |
Industrial - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Johns Hopkins University, 5.25%, 2019 | | $ | 587,000 | | | $ | 679,302 | |
| | |
Insurance - 2.3% | | | | | | | | |
Allianz AG, FRN, 5.5%, 2049 | | EUR | 947,000 | | | $ | 1,295,433 | |
American International Group, Inc., 3%, 2015 | | $ | 20,000 | | | | 20,570 | |
American International Group, Inc., 5.85%, 2018 | | | 881,000 | | | | 1,016,834 | |
American International Group, Inc., 3.375%, 2020 | | | 810,000 | | | | 824,253 | |
ING U.S., Inc., 2.9%, 2018 | | | 403,000 | | | | 411,286 | |
ING U.S., Inc., 5.7%, 2043 (n) | | | 506,000 | | | | 534,800 | |
MetLife, Inc., 1.756%, 2017 | | | 223,000 | | | | 223,397 | |
Metropolitan Life Global Funding I, 5.125%, 2014 (n) | | | 430,000 | | | | 442,058 | |
Principal Financial Group, Inc., 8.875%, 2019 | | | 650,000 | | | | 850,879 | |
Prudential Financial, Inc., 6.2%, 2015 | | | 660,000 | | | | 702,297 | |
Unum Group, 7.125%, 2016 | | | 945,000 | | | | 1,080,430 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,402,237 | |
Insurance - Property & Casualty - 2.2% | | | | | | | | |
Aon Corp., 3.5%, 2015 | | $ | 760,000 | | | $ | 796,201 | |
AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., 5.75%, 2014 | | | 1,035,000 | | | | 1,089,041 | |
AXIS Capital Holdings Ltd., 5.875%, 2020 | | | 370,000 | | | | 413,282 | |
CNA Financial Corp., 5.875%, 2020 | | | 990,000 | | | | 1,148,636 | |
Liberty Mutual Group, Inc., 4.95%, 2022 (n) | | | 757,000 | | | | 800,326 | |
PartnerRe Ltd., 5.5%, 2020 | | | 583,000 | | | | 648,009 | |
QBE Capital Funding III Ltd., FRN, 7.25%, 2041 (n) | | | 920,000 | | | | 968,300 | |
ZFS Finance USA Trust V, 6.5% to 2017, FRN to 2067 (n) | | | 1,095,000 | | | | 1,162,069 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 7,025,864 | |
International Market Quasi-Sovereign - 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
EDF Energies Nouvelles S.A., 6.5%, 2019 (n) | | $ | 1,090,000 | | | $ | 1,311,379 | |
Eksportfinans A.S.A., 5.5%, 2016 | | | 965,000 | | | | 1,010,355 | |
Israel Electric Corp. Ltd., 6.7%, 2017 (n) | | | 553,000 | | | | 597,240 | |
Israel Electric Corp. Ltd., 5.625%, 2018 (n) | | | 1,159,000 | | | | 1,219,848 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,138,822 | |
International Market Sovereign - 8.6% | | | | | | | | |
Federal Republic of Germany, 4.25%, 2018 | | EUR | 756,000 | | | $ | 1,201,624 | |
Federal Republic of Germany, 6.25%, 2030 | | EUR | 631,000 | | | | 1,305,415 | |
15
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
International Market Sovereign - continued | | | | | | | | |
Government of Australia, 5.75%, 2021 | | AUD | 394,000 | | | $ | 420,446 | |
Government of Canada, 4.5%, 2015 | | CAD | 658,000 | | | | 664,936 | |
Government of Canada, 4.25%, 2018 | | CAD | 533,000 | | | | 569,361 | |
Government of Canada, 5.75%, 2033 | | CAD | 119,000 | | | | 162,322 | |
Government of Japan, 1.8%, 2043 | | JPY | 52,000,000 | | | | 547,379 | |
Government of Japan, 1.1%, 2020 | | JPY | 131,000,000 | | | | 1,400,815 | |
Government of Japan, 2.1%, 2024 | | JPY | 62,000,000 | | | | 725,594 | |
Government of Japan, 2.2%, 2027 | | JPY | 148,300,000 | | | | 1,754,424 | |
Government of Japan, 2.4%, 2037 | | JPY | 153,200,000 | | | | 1,808,989 | |
Kingdom of Belgium, 5.5%, 2017 | | EUR | 977,000 | | | | 1,561,356 | |
Kingdom of Denmark, 3%, 2021 | | DKK | 1,532,000 | | | | 312,126 | |
Kingdom of Spain, 4.6%, 2019 | | EUR | 1,417,000 | | | | 2,086,119 | |
Kingdom of Sweden, 5%, 2020 | | SEK | 1,100,000 | | | | 203,809 | |
Kingdom of the Netherlands, 5.5%, 2028 | | EUR | 191,000 | | | | 352,616 | |
Republic of Austria, 4.65%, 2018 | | EUR | 608,000 | | | | 958,667 | |
Republic of Finland, 3.875%, 2017 | | EUR | 179,000 | | | | 273,174 | |
Republic of France, 6%, 2025 | | EUR | 365,000 | | | | 673,670 | |
Republic of France, 4.75%, 2035 | | EUR | 860,000 | | | | 1,469,107 | |
Republic of Iceland, 4.875%, 2016 (n) | | $ | 593,000 | | | | 618,944 | |
Republic of Iceland, 5.875%, 2022 (n) | | | 113,000 | | | | 117,852 | |
Republic of Ireland, 4.5%, 2020 | | EUR | 279,000 | | | | 408,587 | |
Republic of Ireland, 5.4%, 2025 | | EUR | 170,000 | | | | 261,770 | |
Republic of Italy, 5.25%, 2017 | | EUR | 2,230,000 | | | | 3,327,533 | |
Republic of Italy, 3.75%, 2021 | | EUR | 1,482,000 | | | | 2,055,685 | |
United Kingdom Treasury, 8%, 2021 | | GBP | 435,000 | | | | 982,336 | |
United Kingdom Treasury, 4.25%, 2036 | | GBP | 604,000 | | | | 1,104,095 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 27,328,751 | |
Internet - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Baidu, Inc., 3.25%, 2018 | | $ | 588,000 | | | $ | 600,710 | |
Baidu, Inc., 3.5%, 2022 | | | 367,000 | | | | 343,744 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 944,454 | |
Local Authorities - 0.6% | | | | | | | | |
Louisiana Gas & Fuels Tax Rev. (Build America Bonds), FRN, 3%, 2043 | | $ | 820,000 | | | $ | 823,280 | |
State of Illinois (Build America Bonds), 6.725%, 2035 | | | 1,130,000 | | | | 1,172,285 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,995,565 | |
Machinery & Tools - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Atlas Copco AB, 5.6%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 1,073,000 | | | $ | 1,209,303 | |
Ferreycorp S.A.A., 4.875%, 2020 (n) | | | 221,000 | | | | 212,160 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,421,463 | |
16
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Major Banks - 7.5% | | | | | | | | |
ABN AMRO Bank N.V., 4.25%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 913,000 | | | $ | 982,561 | |
Bank of America Corp., 7.375%, 2014 | | | 460,000 | | | | 476,234 | |
Bank of America Corp., 6.5%, 2016 | | | 1,305,000 | | | | 1,482,575 | |
Bank of America Corp., 3.3%, 2023 | | | 1,554,000 | | | | 1,491,462 | |
Barclays Bank PLC, 5.125%, 2020 | | | 770,000 | | | | 867,432 | |
BNP Paribas, 2.7%, 2018 | | | 950,000 | | | | 972,738 | |
BNP Paribas, 7.195% to 2037, FRN to 2049 (n) | | | 600,000 | | | | 624,750 | |
BNP Paribas, FRN, 3.002%, 2014 | | | 164,000 | | | | 168,899 | |
Commonwealth Bank of Australia, 5%, 2019 (n) | | | 760,000 | | | | 858,916 | |
Credit Suisse Group AG, 6.5%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,160,000 | | | | 1,238,184 | |
DBS Bank Ltd., 2.35%, 2017 (n) | | | 980,000 | | | | 1,003,934 | |
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.125%, 2015 | | | 450,000 | | | | 472,768 | |
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., 5.75%, 2022 | | | 1,213,000 | | | | 1,375,518 | |
HSBC USA, Inc., 4.875%, 2020 | | | 930,000 | | | | 1,013,627 | |
ING Bank N.V., 3.75%, 2017 (n) | | | 1,233,000 | | | | 1,303,996 | |
ING Bank N.V., 5.8%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,344,000 | | | | 1,409,537 | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 2%, 2017 | | | 330,000 | | | | 334,198 | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co., 4.625%, 2021 | | | 870,000 | | | | 942,945 | |
Macquarie Bank Ltd., 5%, 2017 (n) | | | 769,000 | | | | 843,285 | |
Macquarie Group Ltd., 6%, 2020 (n) | | | 428,000 | | | | 470,753 | |
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.4%, 2017 | | | 400,000 | | | | 464,827 | |
Morgan Stanley, 6%, 2014 | | | 620,000 | | | | 637,343 | |
Morgan Stanley, 7.3%, 2019 | | | 250,000 | | | | 305,314 | |
Morgan Stanley, 5.625%, 2019 | | | 420,000 | | | | 479,262 | |
Morgan Stanley, FRN, 1.487%, 2016 | | | 1,400,000 | | | | 1,414,690 | |
Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, 2.55%, 2015 | | | 471,000 | | | | 482,389 | |
Santander U.S. Debt S.A.U., 3.724%, 2015 (n) | | | 400,000 | | | | 405,316 | |
Standard Chartered PLC, 3.85%, 2015 (n) | | | 850,000 | | | | 883,754 | |
Wells Fargo & Co., 7.98% to 2018, FRN to 2049 | | | 405,000 | | | | 456,638 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 23,863,845 | |
Medical & Health Technology & Services - 0.7% | | | | | | | | |
Cardinal Health, Inc., 5.8%, 2016 | | $ | 840,000 | | | $ | 948,420 | |
McKesson Corp., 5.7%, 2017 | | | 370,000 | | | | 418,485 | |
Owens & Minor, Inc., 6.35%, 2016 | | | 710,000 | | | | 768,853 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,135,758 | |
Metals & Mining - 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
Barrick Gold Corp., 4.1%, 2023 | | $ | 1,360,000 | | | $ | 1,233,517 | |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 2.375%, 2018 | | | 500,000 | | | | 498,636 | |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 3.1%, 2020 | | | 810,000 | | | | 781,614 | |
Glencore Funding LLC, FRN, 1.422%, 2016 (n) | | | 1,170,000 | | | | 1,164,155 | |
Vale Overseas Ltd., 4.375%, 2022 | | | 421,000 | | | | 411,956 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,089,878 | |
17
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Mortgage-Backed - 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Fannie Mae, 5.5%, 2019 - 2036 | | $ | 725,627 | | | $ | 777,354 | |
Fannie Mae, 6.5%, 2031 | | | 63,876 | | | | 72,086 | |
Fannie Mae, 6%, 2034 (f) | | | 641,859 | | | | 702,217 | |
Freddie Mac, 4.224%, 2020 | | | 818,658 | | | | 895,319 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,446,976 | |
Municipals - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Finance Corp. Rev, “A”, 2.107%, 2018 | | $ | 1,015,000 | | | $ | 998,476 | |
| | |
Natural Gas - Distribution - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
GDF Suez, 1.625%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 1,400,000 | | | $ | 1,402,156 | |
| | |
Natural Gas - Pipeline - 1.9% | | | | | | | | |
DCP Midstream LLC, 3.875%, 2023 | | $ | 630,000 | | | $ | 587,647 | |
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 3.6%, 2023 | | | 825,000 | | | | 787,178 | |
Energy Transfer Partners LP, 6.5%, 2042 | | | 779,000 | | | | 852,963 | |
Enterprise Products Partners LP, 6.3%, 2017 | | | 870,000 | | | | 1,010,394 | |
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners LP, 6.375%, 2041 | | | 1,070,000 | | | | 1,184,226 | |
ONEOK Partners LP, 3.2%, 2018 | | | 510,000 | | | | 527,632 | |
Spectra Energy Capital LLC, 8%, 2019 | | | 679,000 | | | | 827,711 | |
Williams Cos., Inc., 3.7%, 2023 | | | 279,000 | | | | 256,517 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,034,268 | |
Network & Telecom - 1.8% | | | | | | | | |
AT&T, Inc., 5.5%, 2018 | | $ | 660,000 | | | $ | 752,809 | |
Centurylink, Inc., 7.65%, 2042 | | | 810,000 | | | | 751,275 | |
France Telecom, 4.375%, 2014 | | | 640,000 | | | | 655,167 | |
Verizon Communications, Inc., 8.75%, 2018 | | | 448,000 | | | | 577,565 | |
Verizon Communications, Inc., 5.15%, 2023 | | | 2,697,000 | | | | 2,926,213 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 5,663,029 | |
Oil Services - 0.5% | | | | | | | | |
Odebrecht Offshore Drilling Finance Ltd., 6.75%, 2022 (n) | | $ | 527,000 | | | $ | 549,398 | |
Transocean, Inc., 2.5%, 2017 | | | 314,000 | | | | 316,934 | |
Transocean, Inc., 6%, 2018 | | | 670,000 | | | | 757,976 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 1,624,308 | |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - 3.7% | | | | | | | | |
Abbey National Treasury Services PLC, 3.05%, 2018 | | $ | 345,000 | | | $ | 357,150 | |
Banco GNB Sudameris S.A., 3.875%, 2018 (n) | | | 102,000 | | | | 96,645 | |
Bancolombia S.A., 5.95%, 2021 | | | 398,000 | | | | 420,288 | |
Bancolombia S.A., 5.125%, 2022 | | | 43,000 | | | | 41,065 | |
BBVA Banco Continental S.A., 5%, 2022 (n) | | | 40,000 | | | | 40,900 | |
18
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Other Banks & Diversified Financials - continued | | | | | | | | |
Citigroup, Inc., 6.375%, 2014 | | $ | 630,000 | | | $ | 657,644 | |
Citigroup, Inc., 6.01%, 2015 | | | 530,000 | | | | 561,859 | |
Citigroup, Inc., 8.5%, 2019 | | | 919,000 | | | | 1,189,075 | |
Groupe BPCE S.A., 5.7%, 2023 (n) | | | 1,081,000 | | | | 1,108,641 | |
Groupe BPCE S.A., 12.5% to 2019, FRN to 2049 (n) | | | 645,000 | | | | 824,794 | |
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., 3.875%, 2018 | | | 996,000 | | | | 1,016,241 | |
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., FRN, 2.662%, 2014 (n) | | | 590,000 | | | | 592,496 | |
Lloyds TSB Bank PLC, 5.8%, 2020 (n) | | | 645,000 | | | | 741,442 | |
PKO Finance AB, 4.63%, 2022 (n) | | | 57,000 | | | | 57,570 | |
Rabobank Nederland N.V., 3.375%, 2017 | | | 525,000 | | | | 559,583 | |
Rabobank Nederland N.V., 3.95%, 2022 | | | 1,174,000 | | | | 1,147,571 | |
Santander Holdings USA, Inc., 4.625%, 2016 | | | 130,000 | | | | 139,476 | |
Santander Holdings USA, Inc., 3.45%, 2018 | | | 490,000 | | | | 506,890 | |
SunTrust Banks, Inc., 3.5%, 2017 | | | 622,000 | | | | 660,488 | |
Swedbank AB, 2.125%, 2017 (n) | | | 615,000 | | | | 622,236 | |
U.S. Bancorp, 2.95%, 2022 | | | 416,000 | | | | 395,257 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 11,737,311 | |
Personal Computers & Peripherals - 0.2% | | | | | | | | |
Equifax, Inc., 3.3%, 2022 | | $ | 671,000 | | | $ | 635,741 | |
| | |
Pharmaceuticals - 0.8% | | | | | | | | |
Celgene Corp., 3.95%, 2020 | | $ | 890,000 | | | $ | 926,003 | |
Hospira, Inc., 6.05%, 2017 | | | 490,000 | | | | 540,643 | |
Pfizer, Inc., 6.2%, 2019 | | | 860,000 | | | | 1,039,280 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,505,926 | |
Pollution Control - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Republic Services, Inc., 5.25%, 2021 | | $ | 730,000 | | | $ | 808,317 | |
| | |
Printing & Publishing - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Pearson Funding Five PLC, 3.25%, 2023 (n) | | $ | 561,000 | | | $ | 519,852 | |
Pearson Funding Four PLC, 3.75%, 2022 (n) | | | 437,000 | | | | 424,780 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 944,632 | |
Railroad & Shipping - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
CSX Corp., 4.1%, 2044 | | $ | 915,000 | | | $ | 795,214 | |
| | |
Real Estate - 2.1% | | | | | | | | |
AvalonBay Communities, Inc., 3.625%, 2020 | | $ | 999,000 | | | $ | 1,027,605 | |
Boston Properties LP, REIT, 3.7%, 2018 | | | 420,000 | | | | 446,058 | |
DDR Corp., REIT, 3.375%, 2023 | | | 1,263,000 | | | | 1,179,660 | |
HCP, Inc., REIT, 5.375%, 2021 | | | 806,000 | | | | 890,903 | |
19
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
Real Estate - continued | | | | | | | | |
Health Care REIT, Inc., 2.25%, 2018 | | $ | 312,000 | | | $ | 311,468 | |
Kimco Realty Corp., REIT, 6.875%, 2019 | | | 191,000 | | | | 232,264 | |
Simon Property Group, Inc., REIT, 6.1%, 2016 | | | 1,790,000 | | | | 1,996,886 | |
WEA Finance LLC, 6.75%, 2019 (n) | | | 590,000 | | | | 707,723 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,792,567 | |
Retailers - 1.7% | | | | | | | | |
AutoZone, Inc., 6.5%, 2014 | | $ | 1,210,000 | | | $ | 1,223,481 | |
Dollar General Corp., 4.125%, 2017 | | | 706,000 | | | | 754,704 | |
Gap, Inc., 5.95%, 2021 | | | 1,118,000 | | | | 1,240,816 | |
Kohl’s Corp., 3.25%, 2023 | | | 997,000 | | | | 931,357 | |
Limited Brands, Inc., 5.25%, 2014 | | | 242,000 | | | | 251,075 | |
Macy’s, Inc., 7.875%, 2015 | | | 860,000 | | | | 956,950 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 5,358,383 | |
Supermarkets - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
Kroger Co., 3.85%, 2023 | | $ | 1,090,000 | | | $ | 1,083,528 | |
| | |
Supranational - 0.4% | | | | | | | | |
Corporacion Andina de Fomento, 4.375%, 2022 | | $ | 1,290,000 | | | $ | 1,307,677 | |
| | |
Telecommunications - Wireless - 0.9% | | | | | | | | |
American Tower Corp., REIT, 4.625%, 2015 | | $ | 440,000 | | | $ | 462,855 | |
American Tower Corp., REIT, 4.7%, 2022 | | | 732,000 | | | | 737,333 | |
Crown Castle Towers LLC, 6.113%, 2020 (n) | | | 838,000 | | | | 953,605 | |
Digicel Group Ltd., 6%, 2021 (n) | | | 316,000 | | | | 306,520 | |
Millicom International Cellular S.A., 4.75%, 2020 (n) | | | 205,000 | | | | 192,188 | |
MTS International Funding Ltd., 5%, 2023 (n) | | | 201,000 | | | | 192,960 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 2,845,461 | |
Tobacco - 1.4% | | | | | | | | |
Altria Group, Inc., 9.25%, 2019 | | $ | 352,000 | | | $ | 469,821 | |
Altria Group, Inc., 4%, 2024 | | | 401,000 | | | | 402,504 | |
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 8.125%, 2019 | | | 640,000 | | | | 789,704 | |
Lorillard Tobacco Co., 6.875%, 2020 | | | 480,000 | | | | 559,874 | |
Reynolds American, Inc., 6.75%, 2017 | | | 1,040,000 | | | | 1,206,082 | |
Reynolds American, Inc., 4.75%, 2042 | | | 1,270,000 | | | | 1,146,955 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 4,574,940 | |
Transportation - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
Far Eastern Shipping Co., 8%, 2018 (n) | | $ | 310,000 | | | $ | 280,550 | |
| | |
Transportation - Services - 0.3% | | | | | | | | |
ERAC USA Finance Co., 6.375%, 2017 (n) | | $ | 930,000 | | | $ | 1,083,919 | |
20
Portfolio of Investments – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Issuer | | Shares/Par | | | Value ($) | |
Bonds - continued | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government Agencies and Equivalents - 0.1% | | | | | | | | |
National Credit Union Administration Guaranteed Note, 2.9%, 2020 | | $ | 240,000 | | | $ | 249,980 | |
| | |
Utilities - Electric Power - 2.2% | | | | | | | | |
CMS Energy Corp., 4.25%, 2015 | | $ | 760,000 | | | $ | 799,829 | |
CMS Energy Corp., 5.05%, 2022 | | | 608,000 | | | | 661,371 | |
Enel Finance International S.A., 6.25%, 2017 (n) | | | 920,000 | | | | 1,033,887 | |
Exelon Generation Co. LLC, 5.2%, 2019 | | | 360,000 | | | | 393,570 | |
Exelon Generation Co. LLC, 4.25%, 2022 | | | 391,000 | | | | 382,886 | |
Oncor Electric Delivery Co., 4.1%, 2022 | | | 922,000 | | | | 952,744 | |
PPL WEM Holdings PLC, 3.9%, 2016 (n) | | | 1,210,000 | | | | 1,268,067 | |
Progress Energy, Inc., 3.15%, 2022 | | | 1,148,000 | | | | 1,121,940 | |
Waterford 3 Funding Corp., 8.09%, 2017 | | | 277,116 | | | | 277,039 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | $ | 6,891,333 | |
Total Bonds (Identified Cost, $194,197,769) | | | | | | $ | 202,756,799 | |
| | |
Common Stocks - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
Printing & Publishing - 0.0% | | | | | | | | |
American Media Operations, Inc. (a) (Identified Cost, $104,328) | | | 7,311 | | | $ | 36,409 | |
| | |
Underlying Affiliated Funds - 34.3% | | | | | | | | |
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio (v) (Identified Cost, $105,475,508) | | | 10,984,557 | | | $ | 109,186,496 | |
| | |
Money Market Funds - 1.3% | | | | | | | | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio, 0.1%, at Cost and Net Asset Value (v) | | | 4,120,342 | | | $ | 4,120,342 | |
Total Investments (Identified Cost, $303,897,947) | | | | | | $ | 316,100,046 | |
| | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities - 0.6% | | | | | | | 1,792,833 | |
Net Assets - 100.0% | | | | | | $ | 317,892,879 | |
(a) | Non-income producing security. |
(f) | All or a portion of the security has been segregated as collateral for open futures contracts. |
(i) | Interest only security for which the fund receives interest on notional principal (Par amount). Par amount shown is the notional principal and does not reflect the cost of the security. |
(n) | Securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in the ordinary course of business in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At period end, the aggregate value of these securities was $62,240,504, representing 19.6% of net assets. |
(p) | Payment-in-kind security. |
(v) | Underlying affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies managed by MFS. The rate quoted for the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. |
21
Portfolio of Investments – continued
(z) | Restricted securities are not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and are subject to legal restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are subsequently registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. The fund holds the following restricted securities: |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Restricted Securities | | Acquisition Date | | Cost | | | Value | |
Bayview Financial Revolving Mortgage Loan Trust, FRN, 1.771%, 2040 | | 3/01/06 | | | $418,265 | | | | $201,135 | |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 8.73%, 2023 | | 1/18/02 | | | 18,655 | | | | 73,385 | |
Falcon Franchise Loan LLC, FRN, 12.468%, 2025 | | 1/29/03 | | | 21,992 | | | | 43,117 | |
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., FRN, 1.403%, 2039 | | 7/20/04 | | | 44,469 | | | | 52,813 | |
Seagate HDD Cayman, 3.75%, 2018 | | 10/31/13 | | | 416,000 | | | | 416,000 | |
Total Restricted Securities | | | | | | | | | $786,450 | |
% of Net assets | | | | | | | | | 0.2% | |
The following abbreviations are used in this report and are defined:
CDO | | Collateralized Debt Obligation |
CLO | | Collateralized Loan Obligation |
FRN | | Floating Rate Note. Interest rate resets periodically and may not be the rate reported at period end. |
PLC | | Public Limited Company |
REIT | | Real Estate Investment Trust |
Abbreviations indicate amounts shown in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. All amounts are stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. A list of abbreviations is shown below:
Derivative Contracts at 10/31/13
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 10/31/13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type | | Currency | | Counter- party | | Contracts to Deliver/ Receive | | | Settlement Date Range | | In Exchange for | | | Contracts at Value | | | Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Asset Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SELL | | AUD | | Wespac Banking Corp. | | | 456,714 | | | 1/17/14 | | | $432,721 | | | | $429,498 | | | | $3,223 | |
SELL | | CAD | | Merrill Lynch International Bank | | | 1,549,129 | | | 1/17/14 | | | 1,489,859 | | | | 1,482,903 | | | | 6,956 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $10,179 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
22
Portfolio of Investments – continued
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts at 10/31/13 - continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type | | Currency | | Counter- party | | Contracts to Deliver/ Receive | | | Settlement Date Range | | In Exchange for | | | Contracts at Value | | | Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Liability Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
SELL | | DKK | | Deutsche Bank AG | | | 1,701,041 | | | 1/17/14 | | | $308,048 | | | | $309,852 | | | | $(1,804 | ) |
BUY | | EUR | | Deutsche Bank AG | | | 574,199 | | | 1/17/14 | | | 791,953 | | | | 779,703 | | | | (12,250 | ) |
BUY | | EUR | | UBS AG | | | 418,114 | | | 1/17/14 | | | 576,861 | | | | 567,756 | | | | (9,105 | ) |
SELL | | EUR | | Goldman Sachs International | | | 2,428,846 | | | 1/17/14 | | | 3,277,773 | | | | 3,298,124 | | | | (20,351 | ) |
BUY | | GBP | | Goldman Sachs International | | | 316,116 | | | 1/17/14 | | | 510,570 | | | | 506,567 | | | | (4,003 | ) |
SELL | | GBP | | Credit Suisse Group | | | 828,574 | | | 1/17/14 | | | 1,323,038 | | | | 1,327,765 | | | | (4,727 | ) |
SELL | | GBP | | Merrill Lynch International Bank | | | 828,574 | | | 1/17/14 | | | 1,323,946 | | | | 1,327,765 | | | | (3,819 | ) |
BUY | | JPY | | Goldman Sachs International | | | 246,847,376 | | | 1/17/14 | | | 2,515,463 | | | | 2,511,703 | | | | (3,760 | ) |
SELL | | SEK | | Goldman Sachs International | | | 1,114,421 | | | 1/17/14 | | | 170,887 | | | | 171,661 | | | | (774 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $(60,593 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts Outstanding at 10/31/13
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Description | | Currency | | | Contracts | | | Value | | Expiration Date | | | Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | |
Liability Derivatives | | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest Rate Futures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury Note 10 yr (Short) | | | USD | | | | 206 | | | $26,236,031 | | | December - 2013 | | | | $(605,044 | ) |
U.S. Treasury Bond 30 yr (Short) | | | USD | | | | 13 | | | 1,752,563 | | | December - 2013 | | | | (49,939 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $(654,983 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At October 31, 2013, the fund had liquid securities with an aggregate value of $430,065 to cover any commitments for certain derivative contracts.
See Notes to Financial Statements
23
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
At 10/31/13
This statement represents your fund’s balance sheet, which details the assets and liabilities comprising the total value of the fund.
| | | | |
Assets | | | | |
Investments- | | | | |
Non-affiliated issuers, at value (identified cost, $194,302,097) | | | $202,793,208 | |
Underlying affiliated funds, at value (identified cost, $109,595,850) | | | 113,306,838 | |
Total investments, at value (identified cost, $303,897,947) | | | $316,100,046 | |
Receivables for | | | | |
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 10,179 | |
Daily variation margin on open futures contracts | | | 34,219 | |
Investments sold | | | 436,610 | |
Fund shares sold | | | 325,292 | |
Interest and dividends | | | 3,060,206 | |
Other assets | | | 3 | |
Total assets | | | $319,966,555 | |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payables for | | | | |
Distributions | | | $124,248 | |
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts | | | 60,593 | |
Investments purchased | | | 1,069,153 | |
Fund shares reacquired | | | 503,711 | |
Payable to affiliates | | | | |
Investment adviser | | | 8,813 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | 174,392 | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 7,780 | |
Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation | | | 25,308 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | | | 99,678 | |
Total liabilities | | | $2,073,676 | |
Net assets | | | $317,892,879 | |
Net assets consist of | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | | $318,649,205 | |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | | 11,502,964 | |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (12,603,704 | ) |
Undistributed net investment income | | | 344,414 | |
Net assets | | | $317,892,879 | |
Shares of beneficial interest outstanding | | | 47,267,958 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Net assets | | | Shares outstanding | | | Net asset value per share (a) | |
Class A | | | $218,673,564 | | | | 32,430,647 | | | | $6.74 | |
Class B | | | 37,673,428 | | | | 5,629,217 | | | | 6.69 | |
Class C | | | 49,909,843 | | | | 7,481,732 | | | | 6.67 | |
Class I | | | 11,636,044 | | | | 1,726,362 | | | | 6.74 | |
(a) | Maximum offering price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for all share classes, except for Class A, for which the maximum offering price per share was $7.08 [100 / 95.25 x $6.74]. On sales of $50,000 or more, the maximum offering price of Class A shares is reduced. A contingent deferred sales charge may be imposed on redemptions of Class A, Class B, and Class C shares. Redemption price per share was equal to the net asset value per share for Class I. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
24
Financial Statements
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year ended 10/31/13
This statement describes how much your fund earned in investment income and accrued in expenses. It also describes any gains and/or losses generated by fund operations.
| | | | |
Net investment income | | | | |
Income | | | | |
Interest | | | $11,835,341 | |
Dividends | | | 18,433 | |
Dividends from underlying affiliated funds | | | 4,603,124 | |
Total investment income | | | $16,456,898 | |
Expenses | | | | |
Management fee | | | $2,133,880 | |
Distribution and service fees | | | 1,476,748 | |
Shareholder servicing costs | | | 474,799 | |
Administrative services fee | | | 51,915 | |
Independent Trustees’ compensation | | | 9,622 | |
Custodian fee | | | 87,299 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 42,006 | |
Audit and tax fees | | | 63,997 | |
Legal fees | | | 3,250 | |
Miscellaneous | | | 99,075 | |
Total expenses | | | $4,442,591 | |
Fees paid indirectly | | | (101 | ) |
Reduction of expenses by investment adviser and distributor | | | (346,045 | ) |
Net expenses | | | $4,096,445 | |
Net investment income | | | $12,360,453 | |
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | | |
Realized gain (loss) (identified cost basis) | | | | |
Investments: | | | | |
Non-affiliated issuers | | | $2,946,447 | |
Underlying affiliated funds | | | 1,584,564 | |
Futures contracts | | | 641,265 | |
Foreign currency | | | (267,609 | ) |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | $4,904,667 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | | |
Investments | | | $(11,330,497 | ) |
Futures contracts | | | (630,335 | ) |
Translation of assets and liabilities in foreign currencies | | | 38,294 | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | $(11,922,538 | ) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | $(7,017,871 | ) |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $5,342,582 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
25
Financial Statements
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
These statements describe the increases and/or decreases in net assets resulting from operations, any distributions, and any shareholder transactions.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Change in net assets | | | | | | |
From operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | $12,360,453 | | | | $12,785,142 | |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | 4,904,667 | | | | 4,208,299 | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency translation | | | (11,922,538 | ) | | | 11,890,723 | |
Change in net assets from operations | | | $5,342,582 | | | | $28,884,164 | |
Distributions declared to shareholders | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | | $(14,021,721 | ) | | | $(14,036,084 | ) |
Change in net assets from fund share transactions | | | $(889,377 | ) | | | $20,506,833 | |
Total change in net assets | | | $(9,568,516 | ) | | | $35,354,913 | |
Net assets | | | | | | | | |
At beginning of period | | | 327,461,395 | | | | 292,106,482 | |
At end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $344,414 and $1,625,915, respectively) | | | $317,892,879 | | | | $327,461,395 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
26
Financial Statements
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The financial highlights table is intended to help you understand the fund’s financial performance for the past 5 years. Certain information reflects financial results for a single fund share. The total returns in the table represent the rate by which an investor would have earned (or lost) on an investment in the fund share class (assuming reinvestment of all distributions) held for the entire period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.92 | | | | $6.60 | | | | $6.72 | | | | $6.30 | | | | $5.43 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.27 | | | | $0.29 | | | | $0.31 | | | | $0.33 | | | | $0.33 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.15 | ) | | | 0.35 | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.98 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.12 | | | | $0.64 | | | | $0.21 | | | | $0.77 | | | | $1.31 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.30 | ) | | | $(0.32 | ) | | | $(0.33 | ) | | | $(0.35 | ) | | | $(0.44 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.74 | | | | $6.92 | | | | $6.60 | | | | $6.72 | | | | $6.30 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 1.85 | | | | 9.98 | | | | 3.24 | | | | 12.56 | | | | 25.36 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.15 | | | | 1.18 | | | | 1.16 | | | | 1.18 | | | | 1.28 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.05 | | | | 1.05 | | | | 1.05 | | | | 1.02 | | | | 0.92 | |
Net investment income | | | 3.95 | | | | 4.38 | | | | 4.62 | | | | 5.14 | | | | 5.86 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 34 | | | | 42 | | | | 38 | | | | 49 | | | | 53 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $218,674 | | | | $222,166 | | | | $203,155 | | | | $216,200 | | | | $188,786 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
27
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.86 | | | | $6.54 | | | | $6.66 | | | | $6.24 | | | | $5.38 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.22 | | | | $0.24 | | | | $0.26 | | | | $0.28 | | | | $0.29 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.14 | ) | | | 0.35 | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.96 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.08 | | | | $0.59 | | | | $0.16 | | | | $0.72 | | | | $1.25 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.27 | ) | | | $(0.28 | ) | | | $(0.30 | ) | | | $(0.39 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.69 | | | | $6.86 | | | | $6.54 | | | | $6.66 | | | | $6.24 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 1.22 | | | | 9.22 | | | | 2.45 | | | | 11.80 | | | | 24.45 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.91 | | | | 1.94 | | | | 1.92 | | | | 1.94 | | | | 2.01 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.63 | |
Net investment income | | | 3.24 | | | | 3.66 | | | | 3.92 | | | | 4.46 | | | | 5.22 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 34 | | | | 42 | | | | 38 | | | | 49 | | | | 53 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $37,673 | | | | $39,238 | | | | $34,112 | | | | $39,468 | | | | $39,976 | |
| |
Class C | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.84 | | | | $6.52 | | | | $6.64 | | | | $6.22 | | | | $5.35 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.22 | | | | $0.24 | | | | $0.26 | | | | $0.28 | | | | $0.29 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.14 | ) | | | 0.35 | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.97 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.08 | | | | $0.59 | | | | $0.16 | | | | $0.72 | | | | $1.26 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.25 | ) | | | $(0.27 | ) | | | $(0.28 | ) | | | $(0.30 | ) | | | $(0.39 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.67 | | | | $6.84 | | | | $6.52 | | | | $6.64 | | | | $6.22 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(t)(x) | | | 1.21 | | | | 9.23 | | | | 2.45 | | | | 11.82 | | | | 24.74 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.91 | | | | 1.94 | | | | 1.92 | | | | 1.94 | | | | 2.01 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.80 | | | | 1.77 | | | | 1.64 | |
Net investment income | | | 3.26 | | | | 3.68 | | | | 3.94 | | | | 4.47 | | | | 5.19 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 34 | | | | 42 | | | | 38 | | | | 49 | | | | 53 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $49,910 | | | | $54,671 | | | | $46,531 | | | | $46,789 | | | | $37,931 | |
See Notes to Financial Statements
28
Financial Highlights – continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class I | | Years ended 10/31 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2011 | | | 2010 | | | 2009 | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $6.91 | | | | $6.59 | | | | $6.72 | | | | $6.30 | | | | $5.43 | |
Income (loss) from investment operations | |
Net investment income (d) | | | $0.29 | | | | $0.31 | | | | $0.32 | | | | $0.35 | | | | $0.35 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments and foreign currency | | | (0.14 | ) | | | 0.35 | | | | (0.10 | ) | | | 0.43 | | | | 0.97 | |
Total from investment operations | | | $0.15 | | | | $0.66 | | | | $0.22 | | | | $0.78 | | | | $1.32 | |
Less distributions declared to shareholders | |
From net investment income | | | $(0.32 | ) | | | $(0.34 | ) | | | $(0.35 | ) | | | $(0.36 | ) | | | $(0.45 | ) |
Net asset value, end of period (x) | | | $6.74 | | | | $6.91 | | | | $6.59 | | | | $6.72 | | | | $6.30 | |
Total return (%) (r)(s)(x) | | | 2.25 | | | | 10.27 | | | | 3.34 | | | | 12.84 | | | | 25.71 | |
Ratios (%) (to average net assets) and Supplemental data: | |
Expenses before expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 0.90 | | | | 0.93 | | | | 0.91 | | | | 0.93 | | | | 1.00 | |
Expenses after expense reductions (f)(h) | | | 0.80 | | | | 0.80 | | | | 0.80 | | | | 0.77 | | | | 0.64 | |
Net investment income | | | 4.21 | | | | 4.61 | | | | 4.83 | | | | 5.36 | | | | 6.10 | |
Portfolio turnover | | | 34 | | | | 42 | | | | 38 | | | | 49 | | | | 53 | |
Net assets at end of period (000 omitted) | | | $11,636 | | | | $11,387 | | | | $8,309 | | | | $4,823 | | | | $2,939 | |
(d) | Per share data is based on average shares outstanding. |
(f) | Ratios do not reflect reductions from fees paid indirectly, if applicable. |
(h) | For the year ended October 31, 2013, in addition to the fees and expenses which the fund bears directly, the fund indirectly bears a pro rata share of the fees and expenses of the underlying affiliated funds in which the fund invests. Accordingly, the expense ratio for the fund reflects only those fees and expenses borne directly by the fund. Because the underlying affiliated funds have varied expense and fee levels and the fund may own different proportions of the underlying affiliated funds at different times, the amount of fees and expenses incurred indirectly by the fund will vary. |
(r) | Certain expenses have been reduced without which performance would have been lower. |
(s) | From time to time the fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements, without which performance would be lower. |
(t) | Total returns do not include any applicable sales charges. |
(x) | The net asset values per share and total returns have been calculated on net assets which include adjustments made in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles required at period end for financial reporting purposes. |
See Notes to Financial Statements
29
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Business and Organization
MFS Strategic Income Fund (the fund) is a series of MFS Series Trust VIII (the trust). The trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as an open-end management investment company.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
General – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the preparation of these financial statements, management has evaluated subsequent events occurring after the date of the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities through the date that the financial statements were issued. The fund invests in the MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio (“High Yield Pooled Portfolio”). The accounting policies of the High Yield Pooled Portfolio are outlined in its shareholder report, which is available without charge by calling 1-800-225-2606 and on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) web site at http://www.sec.gov or at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. The accounting policies detailed in the following paragraphs cover both the fund and the High Yield Pooled Portfolio, both of which are referred to as the fund. The High Yield Pooled Portfolio’s shareholder report is not covered by this report. The fund and the High Yield Pooled Portfolio invest in high-yield securities rated below investment grade. Investments in high-yield securities involve greater degrees of credit and market risk than investments in higher-rated securities and tend to be more sensitive to economic conditions. The fund invests in foreign securities. Investments in foreign securities are vulnerable to the effects of changes in the relative values of the local currency and the U.S. dollar and to the effects of changes in each country’s legal, political, and economic environment.
In January 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-01 (“ASU 2013-01”) entitled Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities which is intended to clarify the scope of Accounting Standards Update 2011-11 (“ASU 2011-11”), Balance Sheet (Topic 210) – Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. Consistent with the effective date for ASU 2011-11, ASU 2013-01 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. ASU 2013-01 limits the scope of ASU 2011-11’s disclosure requirements on offsetting to financial assets and financial liabilities related to derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities lending and securities borrowing transactions. Although still evaluating the potential impact of these two ASUs to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
In June 2013, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-08 Financial Services –Investment Companies (Topic 946) – Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and
30
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
Disclosure Requirements (“ASU 2013-08”) which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013. ASU 2013-08 sets forth a methodology for determining whether an entity should be characterized as an investment company and prescribes fair value accounting for an investment company’s non-controlling ownership interest in another investment company. FASB has determined that a fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 automatically meets ASU 2013-08’s criteria for an investment company. Although still evaluating the potential impacts of ASU 2013-08 to the fund, management expects that the impact of the fund’s adoption will be limited to additional financial statement disclosures.
Investment Valuations – The investments of the fund and the High Yield Pooled Portfolio are valued as described below.
Debt instruments and floating rate loans (other than short-term instruments), including restricted debt instruments, are generally valued at an evaluated or composite bid as provided by a third-party pricing service. Equity securities, including restricted equity securities, are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which they are primarily traded. Equity securities, for which there were no sales reported that day, are generally valued at the last quoted daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market or exchange on which such securities are primarily traded. Short-term instruments with a maturity at issuance of 60 days or less generally are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Exchange-traded options are generally valued at the last sale or official closing price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the exchange on which such options are primarily traded. Exchange-traded options for which there were no sales reported that day are generally valued at the last daily bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the exchange on which such options are primarily traded. Options not traded on an exchange are generally valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Foreign currency options are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service. Futures contracts are generally valued at last posted settlement price as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which they are primarily traded. Futures contracts for which there were no trades that day for a particular position are generally valued at the closing bid quotation as provided by a third-party pricing service on the market on which such futures contracts are primarily traded. Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are generally valued at the mean of bid and asked prices for the time period interpolated from rates provided by a third-party pricing service for proximate time periods. Swap agreements are generally valued at valuations provided by a third-party pricing service, which for cleared swaps includes an evaluation of any trading activity at the clearinghouses. Open-end investment companies are generally valued at net asset value per share. Securities and other assets generally valued on the basis of information from a third-party pricing service may also be valued at a broker/dealer bid quotation. Values obtained from third-party pricing services can utilize both transaction data and market information such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, and other market data. The values of foreign securities and other assets and liabilities expressed in foreign currencies are converted to U.S. dollars using the mean of bid and asked prices for rates provided by a third-party pricing service.
31
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
The Board of Trustees has delegated primary responsibility for determining or causing to be determined the value of the fund’s investments (including any fair valuation) to the adviser pursuant to valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board. If the adviser determines that reliable market quotations are not readily available, investments are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the adviser in accordance with such procedures under the oversight of the Board of Trustees. Under the fund’s valuation policies and procedures, market quotations are not considered to be readily available for most types of debt instruments and floating rate loans and many types of derivatives. These investments are generally valued at fair value based on information from third-party pricing services. In addition, investments may be valued at fair value if the adviser determines that an investment’s value has been materially affected by events occurring after the close of the exchange or market on which the investment is principally traded (such as foreign exchange or market) and prior to the determination of the fund’s net asset value, or after the halting of trading of a specific security where trading does not resume prior to the close of the exchange or market on which the security is principally traded. The adviser generally relies on third-party pricing services or other information (such as the correlation with price movements of similar securities in the same or other markets; the type, cost and investment characteristics of the security; the business and financial condition of the issuer; and trading and other market data) to assist in determining whether to fair value and at what value to fair value an investment. The value of an investment for purposes of calculating the fund’s net asset value can differ depending on the source and method used to determine value. When fair valuation is used, the value of an investment used to determine the fund’s net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same investment. There can be no assurance that the fund could obtain the fair value assigned to an investment if it were to sell the investment at the same time at which the fund determines its net asset value per share.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the fund’s assets or liabilities. These inputs are categorized into three broad levels. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, an investment’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fund’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the investment. Level 1 includes unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 includes other significant observable market-based inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speed, and credit risk). Level 3 includes unobservable inputs, which may include the adviser’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments. Other financial instruments are derivative instruments not
32
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
reflected in total investments, such as futures contracts and forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The following is a summary of the levels used as of October 31, 2013 in valuing the fund’s assets or liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments at Value | | Level 1 | | | Level 2 | | | Level 3 | | | Total | |
Equity Securities | | | $— | | | | $— | | | | $36,409 | | | | $36,409 | |
U.S. Treasury Bonds & U.S. Government Agency & Equivalents | | | — | | | | 249,980 | | | | — | | | | 249,980 | |
Non-U.S. Sovereign Debt | | | — | | | | 46,053,308 | | | | — | | | | 46,053,308 | |
Municipal Bonds | | | — | | | | 998,476 | | | | — | | | | 998,476 | |
U.S. Corporate Bonds | | | — | | | | 103,356,636 | | | | — | | | | 103,356,636 | |
Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities | | | — | | | | 2,446,976 | | | | — | | | | 2,446,976 | |
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities | | | — | | | | 971,810 | | | | — | | | | 971,810 | |
Asset-Backed Securities (including CDOs) | | | — | | | | 2,038,021 | | | | — | | | | 2,038,021 | |
Foreign Bonds | | | — | | | | 46,641,592 | | | | — | | | | 46,641,592 | |
Mutual Funds | | | 113,306,838 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 113,306,838 | |
Total Investments | | | $113,306,838 | | | | $202,756,799 | | | | $36,409 | | | | $316,100,046 | |
| | | | |
Other Financial Instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Futures Contracts | | | $(654,983 | ) | | | $— | | | | $— | | | | $(654,983 | ) |
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts | | | — | | | | (50,414 | ) | | | — | | | | (50,414 | ) |
For further information regarding security characteristics, see the Portfolio of Investments.
The following is a reconciliation of level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value. The fund’s policy is to recognize transfers between the levels as of the end of the period. The table presents the activity of level 3 securities held at the beginning and the end of the period.
| | | | |
| | Equity Securities | |
Balance as of 10/31/12 | | | $38,675 | |
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | (2,266 | ) |
Balance as of 10/31/13 | | | $36,409 | |
The net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments still held as level 3 at October 31, 2013 is $(2,266).
Foreign Currency Translation – Purchases and sales of foreign investments, income, and expenses are converted into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates prevailing on the respective dates of such transactions or on the reporting date for foreign denominated receivables and payables. Gains and losses attributable to foreign currency exchange rates on sales of securities are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. Gains and losses attributable to foreign exchange rate movements on receivables, payables, income and expenses are recorded for financial statement purposes as foreign currency transaction gains and
33
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
losses. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
Derivatives – The fund uses derivatives for different purposes, primarily to increase or decrease exposure to a particular market or segment of the market, or security, to increase or decrease interest rate or currency exposure, or as alternatives to direct investments. Derivatives are used for hedging or non-hedging purposes. While hedging can reduce or eliminate losses, it can also reduce or eliminate gains. When the fund uses derivatives as an investment to increase market exposure, or for hedging purposes, gains and losses from derivative instruments may be substantially greater than the derivative’s original cost.
The derivative instruments used by the fund were futures contracts and forward foreign currency exchange contracts. The fund’s period end derivatives, as presented in the Portfolio of Investments and the associated Derivative Contract tables, generally are indicative of the volume of its derivative activity during the period.
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the fair value, on a gross basis, of the asset and liability components of derivatives held by the fund at October 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Fair Value (a) | |
Risk | | Derivative Contracts | | Asset Derivatives | | | Liability Derivatives | |
Interest Rate | | Interest Rate Futures | | | $— | | | | $(654,983 | ) |
Foreign Exchange | | Forward Foreign Currency Exchange | | | 10,179 | | | | (60,593 | ) |
Total | | | | | $10,179 | | | | $(715,576 | ) |
(a) | The value of futures contracts outstanding includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation) as reported in the fund’s Portfolio of Investments. Only the current day variation margin for futures contracts is separately reported within the fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the realized gain (loss) on derivatives held by the fund for the year ended October 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | |
Risk | | Futures Contracts | | | Foreign Currency | |
Interest Rate | | | $641,265 | | | | $— | |
Foreign Exchange | | | — | | | | (313,597 | ) |
Total | | | $641,265 | | | | $(313,597 | ) |
34
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
The following table presents, by major type of derivative contract, the change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on derivatives held by the fund for the year ended October 31, 2013 as reported in the Statement of Operations:
| | | | | | | | |
Risk | | Futures Contracts | | | Translation of Assets and Liabilities in Foreign Currencies | |
Interest Rate | | | $(630,335 | ) | | | $— | |
Foreign Exchange | | | — | | | | 38,098 | |
Total | | | $(630,335 | ) | | | $38,098 | |
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. On certain, but not all, over-the-counter derivatives, the fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk whenever possible by entering into an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement on a bilateral basis with each of the counterparties with whom it undertakes a significant volume of transactions. The ISDA Master Agreement gives each party to the agreement the right to terminate all transactions traded under such agreement if there is a certain deterioration in the credit quality of the other party. Upon an event of default or a termination of the ISDA Master Agreement, the non-defaulting party has the right to close out all transactions traded under such agreement and to net amounts owed under each transaction to one net amount payable by one party to the other. This right to close out and net payments across all transactions traded under the ISDA Master Agreement could result in a reduction of the fund’s credit risk to such counterparty equal to any amounts payable by the fund under the applicable transactions, if any.
Collateral and margin requirements differ by type of derivative. Margin requirements are set by the broker or clearing house for cleared derivatives (i.e., futures contracts, cleared swaps, and exchange-traded options) while collateral terms are contract specific for over-the-counter traded derivatives (i.e., forward foreign currency exchange contracts, uncleared swap agreements, and over-the-counter options). For derivatives traded under an ISDA Master Agreement, the collateral requirements are netted across all transactions traded under such agreement and one amount is posted from one party to the other to collateralize such obligations. Cash that has been segregated to cover the fund’s collateral or margin obligations under derivative contracts, if any, will be reported separately in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as restricted cash. Securities pledged as collateral or margin for the same purpose, if any, are noted in the Portfolio of Investments.
The fund’s accounting policy with respect to balance sheet offsetting is that, absent an event of default by the counterparty or a termination of the agreement, the ISDA Master Agreement does not result in an offset of reported amounts of financial assets and financial liabilities in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities across transactions between the fund and the applicable counterparty.
Purchased Options – The fund purchased call options for a premium. Purchased call options entitle the holder to buy a specified number of shares or units of a particular
35
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
security, currency or index at a specified price at a specified date or within a specified period of time. Purchasing call options may hedge against an anticipated increase in the dollar cost of securities or currency to be acquired or increase the fund’s exposure to an underlying instrument.
The premium paid is initially recorded as an investment in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. That investment is subsequently marked-to-market daily with the difference between the premium paid and the market value of the purchased option being recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation. Premiums paid for purchased call options which have expired are treated as realized losses on investments in the Statement of Operations. Upon the exercise or closing of a purchased call option, the premium paid is added to the cost of the security or financial instrument purchased.
Whether or not the option is exercised, the fund’s maximum risk of loss from purchasing an option is the amount of premium paid. All option contracts involve credit risk if the counterparty to the option contract fails to perform. For over-the-counter options, this risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Futures Contracts – The fund entered into futures contracts which may be used to hedge against or obtain broad market exposure, interest rate exposure, currency exposure, or to manage duration. A futures contract represents a commitment for the future purchase or sale of an asset at a specified price on a specified date.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the fund is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an initial margin in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the notional amount of the contract. Subsequent payments (variation margin) are made or received by the fund each day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the contract, and are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gain or loss by the fund until the contract is closed or expires at which point the gain or loss on futures contracts is realized.
The fund bears the risk of interest rates, exchange rates or securities prices moving unexpectedly, in which case, the fund may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the futures contracts and may realize a loss. While futures contracts may present less counterparty risk to the fund since the contracts are exchange traded and the exchange’s clearinghouse guarantees payments to the broker, there is still counterparty credit risk due to the insolvency of the broker. The fund’s maximum risk of loss due to counterparty credit risk is equal to the margin posted by the fund to the broker plus any gains or minus any losses on the outstanding futures contracts.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts – The fund entered into forward foreign currency exchange contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific foreign currency at a fixed price on a future date. These contracts may be used to hedge the fund’s currency risk or for non-hedging purposes. For hedging purposes, the fund may enter into contracts to deliver or receive foreign currency that the fund will receive from or use in its normal investment activities. The fund may also use contracts to hedge against declines in the value of foreign currency denominated securities due to unfavorable exchange rate movements. For non-hedging purposes, the fund may enter
36
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
into contracts with the intent of changing the relative exposure of the fund’s portfolio of securities to different currencies to take advantage of anticipated exchange rate changes.
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any unrealized gains or losses are recorded as a receivable or payable for forward foreign currency exchange contracts until the contract settlement date. On contract settlement date, any gain or loss on the contract is recorded as realized gains or losses on foreign currency.
Risks may arise upon entering into these contracts from unanticipated movements in the value of the contract and from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Generally, the fund’s maximum risk due to counterparty credit risk is the unrealized gain on the contract due to the use of Continuous Linked Settlement, an industry accepted settlement system. This risk is mitigated in cases where there is an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and for posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement.
Swap Agreements – During the period the fund entered into swap agreements. Effective June 10, 2013, certain types of swaps (“cleared swaps”) are required to be centrally cleared under provisions of the Dodd-Frank Regulatory Reform Bill. In a cleared swap transaction, the swap agreement is novated to a central counterparty (the “clearinghouse”) immediately following execution of the swap contract with an executing broker. Thereafter, throughout the term of the cleared swap, the fund interfaces indirectly with the clearinghouse through a clearing broker.
A swap agreement is generally an exchange of cash payments, at specified intervals or upon the occurrence of specified events, between the fund and a counterparty. The net cash payments exchanged are recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations. The value of the swap agreement, which is adjusted daily and includes any related interest accruals to be paid or received by the fund, is recorded in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The daily change in value, including any related interest accruals to be paid or received, is recorded as unrealized appreciation or depreciation on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations. The daily change in valuation of centrally cleared swaps is recorded as a receivable or payable for variation margin in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Amounts paid or received at the inception of the swap agreement are reflected as premiums paid or received in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and are amortized using the effective interest method over the term of the agreement. A liquidation payment received or made upon early termination is recorded as a realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations.
Risks related to swap agreements include the possible lack of a liquid market, unfavorable market and interest rate movements of the underlying instrument and the failure of the counterparty to perform under the terms of the agreements. To address counterparty risk, swap agreements are limited to only highly-rated counterparties. For uncleared swaps, that risk is further reduced by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and
37
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement. Although not covered by an ISDA Master Agreement, the fund’s counterparty risk due to cleared swaps is mitigated by the clearinghouses’ margining requirements and financial safeguards in the event of a clearing broker default.
The fund entered into credit default swap agreements in order to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its credit risk exposure to defaults of corporate and sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate or sovereign issuers to which it is not otherwise exposed. In a credit default swap agreement, the protection buyer can make an upfront payment and will make a stream of payments based on a fixed percentage applied to the agreement notional amount to the protection seller in exchange for the right to receive a specified return upon the occurrence of a defined credit event on the reference obligation (which may be either a single security or a basket of securities issued by corporate or sovereign issuers) and, with respect to the rare cases where physical settlement applies, the delivery by the buyer to the seller of a defined deliverable obligation. Although agreement-specific, credit events generally consist of a combination of the following: bankruptcy, failure to pay, restructuring, obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium, each as defined in the 2003 ISDA Credit Derivatives Definitions as amended by the relevant agreement. Restructuring is generally not applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a North American corporation and obligation acceleration, obligation default, or repudiation/moratorium are generally only applicable when the reference obligation is issued by a sovereign entity or an entity in an emerging country. Upon determination of the final price for the deliverable obligation (or upon delivery of the deliverable obligation in the case of physical settlement), the difference between the value of the deliverable obligation and the swap agreement’s notional amount is recorded as realized gain or loss on swap agreements in the Statement of Operations.
Credit default swap agreements are considered to have credit-risk-related contingent features since they trigger payment by the protection seller to the protection buyer upon the occurrence of a defined credit event. The maximum amount of future, undiscounted payments that the fund, as protection seller, could be required to make is equal to the swap agreement’s notional amount. The protection seller’s payment obligation would be offset to the extent of the value of the agreement’s deliverable obligation. At October 31, 2013, the fund did not hold any credit default swap agreements at an unrealized loss where it is the protection seller.
The fund’s maximum risk of loss from counterparty risk, either as the protection seller or as the protection buyer, is the fair value of the agreement. For uncleared swaps, counterparty risk is reduced by having an ISDA Master Agreement between the fund and the counterparty providing for netting as described above and by the posting of collateral by the counterparty to the fund to cover the fund’s exposure to the counterparty under such ISDA Master Agreement. For cleared swaps, the fund’s counterparty risk is mitigated by the clearinghouses’ margining requirements and financial safeguards in the event of a clearing broker default.
Loans and Other Direct Debt Instruments – The fund invests in loans and loan participations or other receivables. These investments may include standby financing
38
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
commitments, including revolving credit facilities, which obligate the fund to supply additional cash to the borrower on demand. Loan participations involve a risk of insolvency of the lending bank or other financial intermediary.
Indemnifications – Under the fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The fund’s maximum exposure under these agreements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the fund that have not yet occurred.
Investment Transactions and Income – Investment transactions are recorded on the trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. All premium and discount is amortized or accreted for financial statement purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The fund earns certain fees in connection with its floating rate loan purchasing activities. These fees are in addition to interest payments earned and may include amendment fees, commitment fees, facility fees, consent fees, and prepayment fees. Commitment fees are recorded on an accrual basis as income in the accompanying financial statements. Dividends received in cash are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Certain dividends from foreign securities will be recorded when the fund is informed of the dividend if such information is obtained subsequent to the ex-dividend date. Dividend and interest payments received in additional securities are recorded on the ex-dividend or ex-interest date in an amount equal to the value of the security on such date. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status or set to accrue at a rate of interest less than the contractual coupon when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful. Interest income for those debt obligations may be further reduced by the write-off of the related interest receivables when deemed uncollectible.
The fund may receive proceeds from litigation settlements. Any proceeds received from litigation involving portfolio holdings are reflected in the Statement of Operations in realized gain/loss if the security has been disposed of by the fund or in unrealized gain/loss if the security is still held by the fund. Any other proceeds from litigation not related to portfolio holdings are reflected as other income in the Statement of Operations.
Fees Paid Indirectly – The fund’s custody fee may be reduced according to an arrangement that measures the value of cash deposited with the custodian by the fund. This amount, for the year ended October 31, 2013, is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Tax Matters and Distributions – The fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to distribute all of its taxable income, including realized capital gains. As a result, no provision for federal income tax is required. The fund’s federal tax returns, when filed, will remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a three year period. Foreign taxes, if any, have been accrued by the fund in the accompanying financial statements in accordance with the applicable foreign tax law. Foreign income
39
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
taxes may be withheld by certain countries in which the fund invests. Additionally, capital gains realized by the fund on securities issued in or by certain foreign countries may be subject to capital gains tax imposed by those countries.
Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Certain capital accounts in the financial statements are periodically adjusted for permanent differences in order to reflect their tax character. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or net asset value per share. Temporary differences which arise from recognizing certain items of income, expense, gain or loss in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes will reverse at some time in the future. Distributions in excess of net investment income or net realized gains are temporary overdistributions for financial statement purposes resulting from differences in the recognition or classification of income or distributions for financial statement and tax purposes.
Book/tax differences primarily relate to amortization and accretion of debt securities, straddle loss deferrals and derivative transactions.
The tax character of distributions declared to shareholders for the last two fiscal years is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | 10/31/13 | | | 10/31/12 | |
Ordinary income (including any short-term capital gains) | | | $14,021,721 | | | | $14,036,084 | |
The federal tax cost and the tax basis components of distributable earnings were as follows:
| | | | |
As of 10/31/13 | | | |
Cost of investments | | | $305,814,920 | |
Gross appreciation | | | 14,354,196 | |
Gross depreciation | | | (4,069,070 | ) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | | $10,285,126 | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | | 2,632,641 | |
Capital loss carryforwards | | | (10,429,548 | ) |
Other temporary differences | | | (3,244,545 | ) |
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “Act”), net capital losses recognized for fund fiscal years beginning after October 31, 2011 may be carried forward indefinitely, and their character is retained as short-term and/or long-term losses (“post-enactment losses”). Previously, net capital losses were carried forward for eight years and treated as short-term losses (“pre-enactment losses”). As a transition rule, the Act requires that all post-enactment net capital losses be used before pre-enactment net capital losses.
As of October 31, 2013, the fund had capital loss carryforwards available to offset future realized gains. Such pre-enactment losses expire as follows:
| | | | |
10/31/16 | | | $(3,691,429 | ) |
10/31/17 | | | (6,738,119 | ) |
Total | | | $(10,429,548 | ) |
40
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest – The fund offers multiple classes of shares, which differ in their respective distribution and service fees. The fund’s income and common expenses are allocated to shareholders based on the value of settled shares outstanding of each class. The fund’s realized and unrealized gain (loss) are allocated to shareholders based on the daily net assets of each class. Dividends are declared separately for each class. Differences in per share dividend rates are generally due to differences in separate class expenses. Class B shares will convert to Class A shares approximately eight years after purchase. The fund’s distributions declared to shareholders as reported in the Statements of Changes in Net Assets are presented by class as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | From net investment income | |
| | Year ended 10/31/13 | | | Year ended 10/31/12 | |
Class A | | | $10,003,064 | | | | $10,057,700 | |
Class B | | | 1,432,711 | | | | 1,440,802 | |
Class C | | | 1,979,024 | | | | 2,023,171 | |
Class I | | | 606,922 | | | | 514,411 | |
Total | | | $14,021,721 | | | | $14,036,084 | |
(3) Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Adviser – The fund has an investment advisory agreement with MFS to provide overall investment management and related administrative services and facilities to the fund. The management fee is computed daily and paid monthly at an annual rate of 0.65% of the fund’s average daily net assets. The investment adviser has agreed in writing to reduce its management fee to 0.60% of average daily net assets. This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until February 28, 2015. For the year ended October 31, 2013, this waiver amounted to $164,148 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Effective April 1, 2013, MFS has also agreed in writing to reduce its management fee by a specified amount if certain MFS mutual fund assets exceed thresholds agreed to by MFS and the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the period April 1, 2013 through October 31, 2013, this management fee reduction amounted to $1,580, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. The management fee incurred for the year ended October 31, 2013, was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.60% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
The investment adviser has agreed in writing to pay a portion of the fund’s total annual operating expenses, exclusive of interest, taxes, extraordinary expenses, brokerage and transaction costs and investment-related expenses (such as fees and expenses associated with investments in investment companies and other similar investment vehicles), such that total annual fund operating expenses do not exceed the following rates annually of each class’ average daily net assets:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | Class B | | | Class C | | | Class I | |
| 1.05% | | | | 1.80 | % | | | 1.80 | % | | | 0.80 | % |
41
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
This written agreement will continue until modified by the fund’s Board of Trustees, but such agreement will continue at least until February 28, 2015. For year ended October 31, 2013, this reduction amounted to $171,202 and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations.
Distributor – MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. (MFD), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, as distributor, received $133,758 for the year ended October 31, 2013, as its portion of the initial sales charge on sales of Class A shares of the fund.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a distribution plan for certain class shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The fund’s distribution plan provides that the fund will pay MFD for services provided by MFD and financial intermediaries in connection with the distribution and servicing of certain share classes. One component of the plan is a distribution fee paid to MFD and another component of the plan is a service fee paid to MFD. MFD may subsequently pay all, or a portion, of the distribution and/or service fees to financial intermediaries.
Distribution Plan Fee Table:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Distribution Fee Rate (d) | | | Service Fee Rate (d) | | | Total Distribution Plan (d) | | | Annual Effective Rate (e) | | | Distribution and Service Fee | |
Class A | | | — | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 0.25% | | | | $559,364 | |
Class B | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 385,219 | |
Class C | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.25% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 532,165 | |
Total Distribution and Service Fees | | | | | | | | $1,476,748 | |
(d) | In accordance with the distribution plan for certain classes, the fund pays distribution and/or service fees equal to these annual percentage rates of each class’s average daily net assets. The distribution and service fee rates disclosed by class represent the current rates in effect at the end of the reporting period. Any rate changes, if applicable, are detailed below. |
(e) | The annual effective rates represent actual fees incurred under the distribution plan for the year ended October 31, 2013 based on each class’s average daily net assets. Effective January 1, 2013, MFD has voluntarily agreed to rebate a portion of each class’s 0.25% service fee attributable to accounts for which MFD retains the 0.25% service fee except for accounts attributable to MFS or its affiliates’ seed money. For the period January 1, 2013 through October 31, 2013, this rebate amounted to $8,172, $44, and $46 for Class A, Class B, and Class C, respectively, and is reflected as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. |
Certain Class A shares are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) in the event of a shareholder redemption within 18 months of purchase for shares purchased on or after August 1, 2012, and within 24 months of purchase for shares purchased prior to August 1, 2012. Class C shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within 12 months of purchase. Class B shares are subject to a CDSC in the event of a shareholder redemption within six years of purchase. All contingent deferred sales charges are paid to MFD and during the year ended October 31, 2013, were as follows:
| | | | |
| | Amount | |
Class A | | | $3,297 | |
Class B | | | 47,105 | |
Class C | | | 3,937 | |
42
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
Shareholder Servicing Agent – MFS Service Center, Inc. (MFSC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MFS, receives a fee from the fund for its services as shareholder servicing agent calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of the fund as determined periodically under the supervision of the fund’s Board of Trustees. For the year ended October 31, 2013, the fee was $139,266, which equated to 0.0424% annually of the fund’s average daily net assets. MFSC also receives payment from the fund for out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs which may be paid to affiliated and unaffiliated service providers. For the year ended October 31, 2013, these out-of-pocket expenses, sub-accounting and other shareholder servicing costs amounted to $335,533.
Administrator – MFS provides certain financial, legal, shareholder communications, compliance, and other administrative services to the fund. Under an administrative services agreement, the fund partially reimburses MFS the costs incurred to provide these services. The fund is charged an annual fixed amount of $17,500 plus a fee based on average daily net assets. The administrative services fee incurred for the year ended October 31, 2013 was equivalent to an annual effective rate of 0.0158% of the fund’s average daily net assets.
Trustees’ and Officers’ Compensation – The fund pays compensation to independent Trustees in the form of a retainer, attendance fees, and additional compensation to Board and Committee chairpersons. The fund does not pay compensation directly to Trustees or officers of the fund who are also officers of the investment adviser, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the fund from MFS. Certain officers and Trustees of the fund are officers or directors of MFS, MFD, and MFSC.
Prior to December 31, 2001, the fund had an unfunded defined benefit plan (“DB plan”) for independent Trustees. As of December 31, 2001, the Board took action to terminate the DB plan with respect to then-current and any future independent Trustees, such that the DB plan covers only certain of those former independent Trustees who retired on or before December 31, 2001. Effective January 1, 2002, accrued benefits under the DB plan for then-current independent Trustees who continued were credited to an unfunded retirement deferral plan (the “Retirement Deferral plan”), which was established for and exists solely with respect to these credited amounts, and is not available for other deferrals by these or other independent Trustees. Although the Retirement Deferral plan is unfunded, amounts deferred under the plan are periodically adjusted for investment experience as if they had been invested in shares of the fund. The DB plan resulted in a pension expense of $221 and the Retirement Deferral plan resulted in an expense of $128. Both amounts are included in independent Trustees’ compensation for the year ended October 31, 2013. The liability for deferred retirement benefits payable to certain independent Trustees under both plans amounted to $25,200 at October 31, 2013, and is included in “Payable for independent Trustees’ compensation” in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Other – This fund and certain other funds managed by MFS (the funds) have entered into services agreements (the Agreements) which provide for payment of fees by the funds to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC in return for the provision of services of an Independent Chief Compliance Officer (ICCO) and Assistant ICCO,
43
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
respectively, for the funds. The ICCO and Assistant ICCO are officers of the funds and the sole members of Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC, respectively. The funds can terminate the Agreements with Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC at any time under the terms of the Agreements. For the year ended October 31, 2013, the aggregate fees paid by the fund to Tarantino LLC and Griffin Compliance LLC were $2,227 and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations. MFS has agreed to reimburse the fund for a portion of the payments made by the fund in the amount of $853, which is shown as a reduction of total expenses in the Statement of Operations. Additionally, MFS has agreed to bear all expenses associated with office space, other administrative support, and supplies provided to the ICCO and Assistant ICCO.
The fund invests in the MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio which is managed by MFS and seeks current income consistent with preservation of capital and liquidity. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” in the Statement of Operations. This money market fund does not pay a management fee to MFS.
The fund invests in the High Yield Pooled Portfolio. The High Yield Pooled Portfolio is a mutual fund advised by MFS that does not pay management fees to MFS but does incur investment and operating costs. The High Yield Pooled Portfolio is designed to be used by MFS funds to invest in a particular security type rather than invest in the security type directly. The fund invests in the High Yield Pooled Portfolio to gain exposure to high income debt instruments, rather than investing in high income debt instruments directly.
At close of business on March 22, 2013, the fund and certain other MFS funds transferred high income debt instruments, accrued interest and cash to the High Yield Pooled Portfolio, a series of MFS Series Trust III, in exchange for shares of the High Yield Pooled Portfolio. The purpose of the transaction was to pool the portion of the assets of the fund and certain other MFS funds invested in high income debt instruments in the High Yield Pooled Portfolio. The transfer was accomplished by a tax-free exchange by the fund of investments valued at approximately $107,444,790 with a cost basis of approximately $101,892,713, accrued interest of approximately $2,053,165 and cash of approximately $529,112 for approximately 11,002,707 shares of the High Yield Pooled Portfolio (valued at approximately $110,027,067). For financial reporting purposes, investments transferred and shares received by the fund were recorded at fair value; however, the cost basis of the investments delivered to the High Yield Pooled Portfolio was carried forward to the shares received. Income earned on this investment is included in “Dividends from underlying affiliated funds” in the Statement of Operations. The High Yield Pooled Portfolio does not pay a management fee, distribution and/or service fee, or sales charge.
(4) Portfolio Securities
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Purchases | | | Sales | |
U.S. Government securities | | | $— | | | | $757,292 | |
Investments (non-U.S. Government securities) | | | $109,271,477 | | | | $108,297,403 | |
44
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
(5) Shares of Beneficial Interest
The fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest. Transactions in fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended 10/31/13 | | | Year ended 10/31/12 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Shares sold | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 7,850,264 | | | | $53,441,803 | | | | 5,212,992 | | | | $35,007,449 | |
Class B | | | 1,244,269 | | | | 8,400,049 | | | | 1,586,378 | | | | 10,583,277 | |
Class C | | | 1,669,429 | | | | 11,218,637 | | | | 1,990,942 | | | | 13,218,413 | |
Class I | | | 1,421,745 | | | | 9,659,042 | | | | 948,620 | | | | 6,312,067 | |
| | | 12,185,707 | | | | $82,719,531 | | | | 9,738,932 | | | | $65,121,206 | |
| | | | |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 1,279,254 | | | | $8,683,893 | | | | 1,214,324 | | | | $8,166,624 | |
Class B | | | 155,169 | | | | 1,045,000 | | | | 145,321 | | | | 969,483 | |
Class C | | | 235,912 | | | | 1,584,323 | | | | 218,991 | | | | 1,456,354 | |
Class I | | | 75,265 | | | | 510,092 | | | | 61,918 | | | | 416,465 | |
| | | 1,745,600 | | | | $11,823,308 | | | | 1,640,554 | | | | $11,008,926 | |
| | | | |
Shares reacquired | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (8,814,020 | ) | | | $(59,734,159 | ) | | | (5,114,592 | ) | | | $(34,279,207 | ) |
Class B | | | (1,486,947 | ) | | | (10,012,123 | ) | | | (1,230,067 | ) | | | (8,161,335 | ) |
Class C | | | (2,416,054 | ) | | | (16,164,686 | ) | | | (1,357,375 | ) | | | (9,014,642 | ) |
Class I | | | (1,417,507 | ) | | | (9,521,248 | ) | | | (624,299 | ) | | | (4,168,115 | ) |
| | | (14,134,528 | ) | | | $(95,432,216 | ) | | | (8,326,333 | ) | | | $(55,623,299 | ) |
| | | | |
Net change | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | 315,498 | | | | $2,391,537 | | | | 1,312,724 | | | | $8,894,866 | |
Class B | | | (87,509 | ) | | | (567,074 | ) | | | 501,632 | | | | 3,391,425 | |
Class C | | | (510,713 | ) | | | (3,361,726 | ) | | | 852,558 | | | | 5,660,125 | |
Class I | | | 79,503 | | | | 647,886 | | | | 386,239 | | | | 2,560,417 | |
| | | (203,221 | ) | | | $(889,377 | ) | | | 3,053,153 | | | | $20,506,833 | |
(6) Line of Credit
The fund and certain other funds managed by MFS participate in a $1.1 billion unsecured committed line of credit, subject to a $1 billion sublimit, provided by a syndication of banks under a credit agreement. Borrowings may be made for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund, based on its borrowings, generally at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Reserve funds rate or one month LIBOR plus an agreed upon spread. A commitment fee, based on the average daily, unused portion of the committed line of credit, is allocated among the participating funds at the end of each calendar quarter. In addition, the fund and other funds managed by MFS have established unsecured uncommitted borrowing arrangements with certain banks for temporary financing needs. Interest is charged to each fund,
45
Notes to Financial Statements – continued
based on its borrowings, at a rate equal to the Federal Reserve funds rate plus an agreed upon spread. For the year ended October 31, 2013, the fund’s commitment fee and interest expense were $1,692 and $0, respectively, and are included in “Miscellaneous” expense in the Statement of Operations.
(7) Transactions in Underlying Affiliated Funds-Affiliated Issuers
An affiliated issuer may be considered one in which the fund owns 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities, or a company which is under common control. For the purposes of this report, the fund assumes the following to be affiliated issuers:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Funds | | Beginning Shares/Par Amount | | | Acquisitions Shares/Par Amount | | | Dispositions Shares/Par Amount | | | Ending Shares/Par Amount | |
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio | | | — | | | | 11,972,229 | | | | (987,672 | ) | | | 10,984,557 | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | 8,495,868 | | | | 77,783,501 | | | | (82,159,027 | ) | | | 4,120,342 | |
| | | | |
Underlying Affiliated Funds | | Realized Gain (Loss) | | | Capital Gain Distributions | | | Dividend Income | | | Ending Value | |
MFS High Yield Pooled Portfolio | | | $1,584,564 | | | | $— | | | | $4,596,755 | | | | $109,186,496 | |
MFS Institutional Money Market Portfolio | | | — | | | | — | | | | 6,369 | | | | 4,120,342 | |
Total | | | $1,584,564 | | | | $— | | | | $4,603,124 | | | | $113,306,838 | |
46
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Trustees of MFS Series Trust VIII and Shareholders of MFS Strategic Income Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of MFS Strategic Income Fund (the Fund) (one of the portfolios comprising MFS Series Trust VIII), including the portfolio of investments, as of October 31, 2013, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of October 31, 2013, by correspondence with the custodian and others or by other appropriate auditing procedures where replies from others were not received. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MFS Strategic Income Fund at October 31, 2013, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and its financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616727ernst_youngllp.jpg)
Boston, Massachusetts
December 19, 2013
47
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS — IDENTIFICATION AND BACKGROUND
The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, as of December 1, 2013, are listed below, together with their principal occupations during the past five years. (Their titles may have varied during that period.) The address of each Trustee and Officer is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-7618.
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Age | | Position(s) Held with Fund | | Trustee/Officer Since (h) | | Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years | | Other Directorships (j) |
INTERESTED TRUSTEES |
Robert J. Manning (k) (age 50) | | Trustee | | February 2004 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director; President (until 2009); Chief Investment Officer (until 2010) | | N/A |
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES | | | | |
David H. Gunning (age 71) | | Trustee and Chair of Trustees | | January 2004 | | Private investor | | Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (welding equipment manufacturer), Director; Development Alternatives, Inc. (consulting), Director/Non-Executive Chairman; Portman Limited (mining), Director (until 2008) |
Robert E. Butler (age 72) | | Trustee | | January 2006 | | Consultant – investment company industry regulatory and compliance matters | | N/A |
Maureen R. Goldfarb (age 58) | | Trustee | | January 2009 | | Private investor | | N/A |
William R. Gutow (age 72) | | Trustee | | December 1993 | | Private investor and real estate consultant; Capitol Entertainment Management Company (video franchise), Vice Chairman | | Texas Donuts (donut franchise), Vice Chairman (until 2010) |
48
Trustees and Officers – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Age | | Position(s) Held with Fund | | Trustee/Officer Since (h) | | Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years | | Other Directorships (j) |
Michael Hegarty (age 68) | | Trustee | | December 2004 | | Private investor | | Brookfield Office Properties, Inc. (real estate), Director; Rouse Properties Inc. (real estate), Director; Capmark Financial Group Inc. (real estate), Director |
John P. Kavanaugh (age 59) | | Trustee | | January 2009 | | Private investor | | N/A |
J. Dale Sherratt (age 75) | | Trustee | | June 1989 | | Insight Resources, Inc. (acquisition planning specialists), President; Wellfleet Investments (investor in health care companies), Managing General Partner | | N/A |
Laurie J. Thomsen (age 56) | | Trustee | | March 2005 | | Private investor; New Profit, Inc. (venture philanthropy), Executive Partner (until 2010) | | The Travelers Companies (insurance), Director |
Robert W. Uek (age 72) | | Trustee | | January 2006 | | Consultant to investment company industry | | N/A |
OFFICERS |
John M. Corcoran (k) (age 48) | | President | | October 2008 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President (since October 2008); State Street Bank and Trust (financial services provider), Senior Vice President, (until 2008) | | N/A |
Christopher R. Bohane (k) (age 39) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | July 2005 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel | | N/A |
Kino Clark (k) (age 45) | | Assistant Treasurer | | January 2012 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President | | N/A |
49
Trustees and Officers – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Age | | Position(s) Held with Fund | | Trustee/Officer Since (h) | | Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years | | Other Directorships (j) |
Thomas H. Connors (k) (age 54) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | September 2012 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel; Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. (financial service provider), Director and Senior Counsel (until 2012) | | N/A |
Ethan D. Corey (k) (age 50) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | July 2005 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel | | N/A |
David L. DiLorenzo (k) (age 45) | | Treasurer | | July 2005 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President | | N/A |
Robyn L. Griffin (age 38) | | Assistant Independent Chief Compliance Officer | | August 2008 | | Griffin Compliance LLC (provider of compliance services), Principal (since August 2008); State Street Corporation (financial services provider), Mutual Fund Administration Assistant Vice President (until 2008) | | N/A |
Brian E. Langenfeld (k) (age 40) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | June 2006 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel | | N/A |
Susan S. Newton (k) (age 63) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | May 2005 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel | | N/A |
Susan A. Pereira (k) (age 43) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | July 2005 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President and Senior Counsel | | N/A |
50
Trustees and Officers – continued
| | | | | | | | |
Name, Age | | Position(s) Held with Fund | | Trustee/Officer Since (h) | | Principal Occupations During the Past Five Years | | Other Directorships (j) |
Kasey L. Phillips (k) (age 42) | | Assistant Treasurer | | September 2012 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Vice President; Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC, Senior Vice President, Fund Treasurer (until 2012) | | N/A |
Mark N. Polebaum (k) (age 61) | | Secretary and Clerk | | January 2006 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary | | N/A |
Frank L. Tarantino (age 69) | | Independent Chief Compliance Officer | | June 2004 | | Tarantino LLC (provider of compliance services), Principal | | N/A |
Richard S. Weitzel (k) (age 43) | | Assistant Secretary and Assistant Clerk | | October 2007 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President and Associate General Counsel | | N/A |
James O. Yost (k) (age 53) | | Deputy Treasurer | | September 1990 | | Massachusetts Financial Services Company, Senior Vice President | | N/A |
(h) | Date first appointed to serve as Trustee/officer of an MFS Fund. Each Trustee has served continuously since appointment unless indicated otherwise. For the period from December 15, 2004 until February 22, 2005, Mr. Manning served as Advisory Trustee. For the period October 2008, until January 2012, Mr. Corcoran served as Treasurer of the Funds. Prior to January 2012, Messrs. DiLorenzo and Yost served as Assistant Treasurers of the Funds. |
(j) | Directorships or trusteeships of companies required to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (i.e., “public companies”). |
(k) | “Interested person” of the Trust within the meaning of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (referred to as the 1940 Act), which is the principal federal law governing investment companies like the fund, as a result of position with MFS. The address of MFS is 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02199-7618. |
Each Trustee has been elected by shareholders and each Trustee and officer holds office until his or her successor is chosen and qualified or until his or her earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal. The Trust does not hold annual meetings for the purpose of electing Trustees, and Trustees are not elected for fixed terms. Messrs. Butler, Kavanaugh, Uek and Ms. Thomsen are members of the Trust’s Audit Committee.
Each of the Fund’s Trustees and officers holds comparable positions with certain other funds of which MFS or a subsidiary is the investment adviser or distributor, and, in the case of the officers, with certain affiliates of MFS. As of January 1, 2013, the Trustees served as board members of 143 funds within the MFS Family of Funds.
51
Trustees and Officers – continued
The Statement of Additional Information for the Fund includes further information about the Trustees and is available without charge upon request by calling 1-800-225-2606.
| | |
Investment Adviser | | Custodian |
Massachusetts Financial Services Company 111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199-7618 | | JPMorgan Chase Bank One Chase Manhattan Plaza New York, NY 10081 |
Distributor | | Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
MFS Fund Distributors, Inc. 111 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02199-7618 | | Ernst & Young LLP 200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116 |
Portfolio Managers | | |
William Adams | | |
Ward Brown | | |
James Calmas | | |
David Cole | | |
Robert Persons | | |
Matthew Ryan | | |
Erik Weisman | | |
52
BOARD REVIEW OF INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT
The Investment Company Act of 1940 requires that both the full Board of Trustees and a majority of the non-interested (“independent”) Trustees, voting separately, annually approve the continuation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS. The Trustees consider matters bearing on the Fund and its advisory arrangements at their meetings throughout the year, including a review of performance data at each regular meeting. In addition, the independent Trustees met several times over the course of three months beginning in May and ending in July, 2013 (“contract review meetings”) for the specific purpose of considering whether to approve the continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund and the other investment companies that the Board oversees (the “MFS Funds”). The independent Trustees were assisted in their evaluation of the Fund’s investment advisory agreement by independent legal counsel, from whom they received separate legal advice and with whom they met separately from MFS during various contract review meetings. The independent Trustees were also assisted in this process by the MFS Funds’ Independent Chief Compliance Officer, a full-time senior officer appointed by and reporting to the independent Trustees.
In connection with their deliberations regarding the continuation of the investment advisory agreement, the Trustees, including the independent Trustees, considered such information and factors as they believed, in light of the legal advice furnished to them and their own business judgment, to be relevant. The investment advisory agreement for the Fund was considered separately, although the Trustees also took into account the common interests of all MFS Funds in their review. As described below, the Trustees considered the nature, quality, and extent of the various investment advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by MFS under the existing investment advisory agreement and other arrangements with the Fund.
In connection with their contract review meetings, the Trustees received and relied upon materials that included, among other items: (i) information provided by Lipper Inc., an independent third party, on the investment performance of the Fund for various time periods ended December 31, 2012 and the investment performance of a group of funds with substantially similar investment classifications/objectives (the “Lipper performance universe”), (ii) information provided by Lipper Inc. on the Fund’s advisory fees and other expenses and the advisory fees and other expenses of comparable funds identified by Lipper Inc. (the “Lipper expense group”), (iii) information provided by MFS on the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of MFS, including institutional separate accounts and other clients, (iv) information as to whether and to what extent applicable expense waivers, reimbursements or fee “breakpoints” are observed for the Fund, (v) information regarding MFS’ financial results and financial condition, including MFS’ and certain of its affiliates’ estimated profitability from services performed for the Fund and the MFS Funds as a whole, and compared to MFS’ institutional business, (vi) MFS’ views regarding the outlook for the mutual fund industry and the strategic business plans of MFS, (vii) descriptions of various functions performed by MFS for the Funds, such as compliance monitoring and portfolio trading practices, and (viii) information regarding the overall organization of MFS, including information about MFS’ senior management and other personnel providing investment advisory, administrative and other services to the Fund and the other MFS Funds. The comparative performance, fee and expense
53
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
information prepared and provided by Lipper Inc. was not independently verified and the independent Trustees did not independently verify any information provided to them by MFS.
The Trustees’ conclusion as to the continuation of the investment advisory agreement was based on a comprehensive consideration of all information provided to the Trustees and not the result of any single factor. Some of the factors that figured particularly in the Trustees’ deliberations are described below, although individual Trustees may have evaluated the information presented differently from one another, giving different weights to various factors. It is also important to recognize that the fee arrangements for the Fund and other MFS Funds are the result of years of review and discussion between the independent Trustees and MFS, that certain aspects of such arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and that the Trustees’ conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of these same arrangements during the course of the year and in prior years.
Based on information provided by Lipper Inc. and MFS, the Trustees reviewed the Fund’s total return investment performance as well as the performance of peer groups of funds over various time periods. The Trustees placed particular emphasis on the total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares in comparison to the performance of funds in its Lipper performance universe over the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, which the Trustees believed was a long enough period to reflect differing market conditions. The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 3rd quintile relative to the other funds in the universe for this three-year period (the 1st quintile being the best performers and the 5th quintile being the worst performers). The total return performance of the Fund’s Class A shares was in the 3rd quintile for the one-year period and the 4th quintile for the five-year period ended December 31, 2012 relative to the Lipper performance universe. Because of the passage of time, these performance results may differ from the performance results for more recent periods, including those shown elsewhere in this report.
In the course of their deliberations, the Trustees took into account information provided by MFS in connection with the contract review meetings, as well as during investment review meetings conducted with portfolio management personnel during the course of the year regarding the Fund’s performance. After reviewing these and related factors, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that they were satisfied with MFS’ responses and efforts relating to investment performance.
In assessing the reasonableness of the Fund’s advisory fee, the Trustees considered, among other information, the Fund’s advisory fee and the total expense ratio of the Fund’s Class A shares as a percentage of average daily net assets and the advisory fee and total expense ratios of peer groups of funds based on information provided by Lipper Inc. The Trustees considered that MFS has agreed in writing to reduce its advisory fee, and that MFS currently observes an expense limitation for the Fund, each of which may not be changed without the Trustees’ approval. The Trustees also considered that, according to the Lipper data (which takes into account any fee reductions or expense limitations that were in effect during the Fund’s last fiscal year), the Fund’s effective advisory fee rate and total expense ratio were each approximately at the Lipper expense group median.
54
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
The Trustees also considered the advisory fees charged by MFS to any comparable institutional accounts. In comparing these fees, the Trustees considered information provided by MFS as to the generally broader scope of services provided by MFS to the Fund in comparison to institutional accounts, the higher demands placed on MFS’ investment personnel and trading infrastructure as a result of the daily cash in-flows and out-flows of the Fund, and the impact on MFS and expenses associated with the more extensive regulatory regime to which the Fund is subject in comparison to institutional accounts.
The Trustees also considered whether the Fund may benefit from any economies of scale in the management of the Fund in the event of growth in assets of the Fund and/or growth in assets of the MFS Funds as a whole. They noted that the Fund’s advisory fee rate schedule is not subject to any breakpoints. Taking into account the advisory fee waiver and the expense limitation noted above, the Trustees determined not to recommend any advisory fee breakpoints for the Fund at this time. The Trustees also noted that MFS has agreed in writing to waive a portion of the management fees of certain MFS Funds, including the Fund, if the total combined assets of certain funds within the MFS Funds’ complex increase above agreed upon thresholds (the “group fee waiver”), enabling the Fund’s shareholders to share in the benefits from any economies of scale at the complex level. The group fee waiver is reviewed and renewed annually between the Board and MFS. The Trustees concluded that the group fee waiver was sufficient to allow the Fund to benefit from economies of scale as its assets and overall complex assets grow.
The Trustees also considered information prepared by MFS relating to MFS’ costs and profits with respect to the Fund, the MFS Funds considered as a group, and other investment companies and accounts advised by MFS, as well as MFS’ methodologies used to determine and allocate its costs to the MFS Funds, the Fund and other accounts and products for purposes of estimating profitability.
After reviewing these and other factors described herein, the Trustees concluded, within the context of their overall conclusions regarding the investment advisory agreement, that the advisory fees charged to the Fund represent reasonable compensation in light of the services being provided by MFS to the Fund.
In addition, the Trustees considered MFS’ resources and related efforts to continue to retain, attract and motivate capable personnel to serve the Fund. The Trustees also considered current and developing conditions in the financial services industry, including the presence of large and well-capitalized companies which are spending, and appear to be prepared to continue to spend, substantial sums to engage personnel and to provide services to competing investment companies. In this regard, the Trustees also considered the financial resources of MFS and its ultimate parent, Sun Life Financial Inc. The Trustees also considered the advantages and possible disadvantages to the Fund of having an adviser that also serves other investment companies as well as other accounts.
The Trustees also considered the nature, quality, cost, and extent of administrative, transfer agency, and distribution services provided to the Fund by MFS and its affiliates under agreements and plans other than the investment advisory agreement, including any 12b-1 fees the Fund pays to MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., an affiliate of MFS. The
55
Board Review of Investment Advisory Agreement – continued
Trustees also considered the nature, extent and quality of certain other services MFS performs or arranges for on the Fund’s behalf, which may include securities lending programs, directed expense payment programs, class action recovery programs, and MFS’ interaction with third-party service providers, principally custodians and sub-custodians. The Trustees concluded that the various non-advisory services provided by MFS and its affiliates on behalf of the Fund were satisfactory.
The Trustees also considered benefits to MFS from the use of the Fund’s portfolio brokerage commissions, if applicable, to pay for investment research and various other factors. Additionally, the Trustees considered so-called “fall-out benefits” to MFS such as reputational value derived from serving as investment manager to the Fund.
Based on their evaluation of factors that they deemed to be material, including those factors described above, the Board of Trustees, including the independent Trustees, concluded that the Fund’s investment advisory agreement with MFS should be continued for an additional one-year period, commencing August 1, 2013.
A discussion regarding the Board’s most recent review and renewal of the fund’s Investment Advisory Agreement with MFS is available by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products” section of the MFS Web site (mfs.com).
56
PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND INFORMATION
A general description of the MFS funds’ proxy voting policies and procedures is available without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-225-2606, by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
Information regarding how the fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30 is available without charge by visiting the Proxy Voting section of mfs.com or by visiting the SEC’s Web site at http://www.sec.gov.
QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO DISCLOSURE
The fund will file a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. A shareholder can obtain the quarterly portfolio holdings report at mfs.com. The fund’s Form N-Q is also available on the EDGAR database on the Commission’s Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and may be reviewed and copied at the:
Public Reference Room
Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE, Room 1580
Washington, D.C. 20549
Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. Copies of the fund’s Form N-Q also may be obtained, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following e-mail address: publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing the Public Reference Section at the above address.
FURTHER INFORMATION
From time to time, MFS may post important information about the fund or the MFS funds on the MFS web site (mfs.com). This information is available by visiting the “News & Commentary” section of mfs.com or by clicking on the fund’s name under “Mutual Funds” in the “Products” section of mfs.com.
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (unaudited)
The fund will notify shareholders of amounts for use in preparing 2013 income tax forms in January 2014.
57
rev. 3/11
| | | | |
| | |
FACTS | | WHAT DOES MFS DO WITH YOUR PERSONAL INFORMATION? | | ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616727logo_07.jpg) |
| | |
Why? | | Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do. |
| | |
What? | | The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include: • Social Security number and account balances • Account transactions and transaction history • Checking account information and wire transfer instructions When you are no longer our customer, we continue to share your information as described in this notice. |
| | |
How? | | All financial companies need to share customers’ personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers’ personal information; the reasons MFS chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. |
| | | | |
Reasons we can share your personal information | | Does MFS share? | | Can you limit this sharing? |
For our everyday business purposes – such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or report to credit bureaus | | Yes | | No |
For our marketing purposes – to offer our products and services to you | | No | | We don’t share |
For joint marketing with other financial companies | | No | | We don’t share |
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your transactions and experiences | | No | | We don’t share |
For our affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your creditworthiness | | No | | We don’t share |
For nonaffiliates to market to you | | No | | We don’t share |
| | |
Questions? | | Call 800-225-2606 or go to mfs.com. |
58
| | |
Who we are |
Who is providing this notice? | | MFS Funds, MFS Investment Management, MFS Institutional Advisors, Inc., MFS Fund Distributors, Inc., MFS Heritage Trust Company, and MFS Service Center, Inc. |
| | |
What we do |
How does MFS protect my personal information? | | To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include procedural, electronic, and physical safeguards for the protection of the personal information we collect about you. |
How does MFS collect my personal information? | | We collect your personal information, for example, when you •open an account or provide account information •direct us to buy securities or direct us to sell your securities •make a wire transfer We also collect your personal information from others, such as credit bureaus, affiliates and other companies. |
Why can’t I limit all sharing? | | Federal law gives you the right to limit only •sharing for affiliates’ everyday business purposes – information about your creditworthiness •affiliates from using your information to market to you •sharing for nonaffiliates to market to you State laws and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing. |
| | |
Definitions |
Affiliates | | Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. •MFS does not share personal information with affiliates, except for everyday business purposes as described on page one of this notice. |
Nonaffiliates | | Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. •MFS does not share with nonaffiliates so they can market to you. |
Joint Marketing | | A formal agreement between nonaffiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you. •MFS doesn’t jointly market. |
| | |
Other important information |
If you own an MFS product or receive an MFS service in the name of a third party such as a bank or broker-dealer, their privacy policy may apply to you instead of ours. |
59
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616727logo_03.jpg)
Save paper with eDelivery.
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-14-002455/g616727art_04.jpg)
| MFS® will send you prospectuses, |
reports, and proxies directly via e-mail so you will get information faster with less mailbox clutter.
To sign up:
1. Go to mfs.com.
2. Log in via MFS® Access.
3. Select eDelivery.
If you own your MFS fund shares through a financial institution or a retirement plan, MFS® TALK, MFS® Access, or eDelivery may not be available to you.
CONTACT
WEB SITE
mfs.com
MFS TALK
1-800-637-8255
24 hours a day
ACCOUNT SERVICE AND LITERATURE
Shareholders
1-800-225-2606
Financial advisors
1-800-343-2829
Retirement plan services
1-800-637-1255
MAILING ADDRESS
MFS Service Center, Inc.
P.O. Box 55824
Boston, MA 02205-5824
OVERNIGHT MAIL
MFS Service Center, Inc.
c/o Boston Financial Data Services
30 Dan Road
Canton, MA 02021-2809
The Registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics pursuant to Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and as defined in Form N-CSR that applies to the Registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer. During the period covered by this report, the Registrant has not amended any provision in its Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that relates to an element of the Code’s definitions enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 2 of this Form N-CSR. During the period covered by this report, the Registrant did not grant a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from any provision of the Code.
A copy of the Code of Ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT. |
Messrs. Robert E. Butler, John P. Kavanaugh and Robert W. Uek and Ms. Laurie J. Thomsen, members of the Audit Committee, have been determined by the Board of Trustees in their reasonable business judgment to meet the definition of “audit committee financial expert” as such term is defined in Form N-CSR. In addition, Messrs. Butler, Kavanaugh and Uek and Ms. Thomsen are “independent” members of the Audit Committee (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002). The Securities and Exchange Commission has stated that the designation of a person as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 on the Form N-CSR does not impose on such a person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations or liability imposed on such person as a member of the Audit Committee and the Board of Trustees in the absence of such designation or identification.
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES. |
Items 4(a) through 4(d) and 4(g):
The Board of Trustees has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP (“Deloitte”) to serve as independent accountants to a certain series of the Registrant and Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”) to serve in the same capacity to the other series of the Registrant (the series referred to collectively as the “Funds” and singularly as a “Fund”). The tables below set forth the audit fees billed to the Funds as well as fees for non-audit services provided to the Funds and/or to the Funds’ investment adviser, Massachusetts Financial Services Company (“MFS”) and to various entities either controlling, controlled by, or under common control with MFS that provide ongoing services to the Funds (“MFS Related Entities”).
For the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, audit fees billed to the Funds by Deloitte and E&Y were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Audit Fees | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Fees billed by Deloitte: | | | | | | | | |
MFS Global Growth Fund | | | 55,956 | | | | 54,384 | |
| |
| | Audit Fees | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Fees billed by E&Y: | | | | | | | | |
MFS Strategic Income Fund | | | 51,999 | | | | 48,544 | |
For the fiscal years ended October 31, 2013 and 2012, fees billed by Deloitte and E&Y for audit-related, tax and other services provided to the Funds and for audit-related, tax and other services provided to MFS and MFS Related Entities were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Audit-Related Fees1 | | | Tax Fees2 | | | All Other Fees3 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Fees billed by Deloitte: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To MFS Global Growth Fund | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 5,919 | | | | 5,803 | | | | 1,101 | | | | 1,133 | |
| | | |
| | Audit-Related Fees1 | | | Tax Fees2 | | | All Other Fees3 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Fees billed by Deloitte: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To MFS and MFS Related Entities of MFS Global Growth Fund * | | | 1,667,472 | | | | 1,064,074 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Aggregate Fees for Non-audit Services | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Fees Billed by Deloitte: | | | | | | | | |
To MFS Global Growth Fund, MFS and MFS Related Entities# | | | 1,689,312 | | | | 1,354,850 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Audit-Related Fees1 | | | Tax Fees2 | | | All Other Fees4 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Fees billed by E&Y: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To MFS Strategic Income Fund | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 9,702 | | | | 9,565 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
| | | |
| | Audit-Related Fees1 | | | Tax Fees2 | | | All Other Fees4 | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Fees billed by E&Y: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
To MFS and MFS Related Entities of MFS Strategic Income Fund * | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | | | | 0 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Aggregate Fees for Non-audit Services | |
| | 2013 | | | 2012 | |
Fees Billed by E&Y: | | | | | | | | |
To Strategic Income Fund, MFS and MFS Related Entities# | | | 67,702 | | | | 49,565 | |
* | This amount reflects the fees billed to MFS and MFS Related Entities for non-audit services relating directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds (portions of which services also related to the operations and financial reporting of other funds within the MFS Funds complex). |
# | This amount reflects the aggregate fees billed by Deloitte or E&Y, as the case may be, for non-audit services rendered to the Funds and for non-audit services rendered to MFS and the MFS Related Entities. |
1 | The fees included under “Audit-Related Fees” are fees related to assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements, but not reported under ‘‘Audit Fees,’’ including accounting consultations, agreed-upon procedure reports, attestation reports, comfort letters and internal control reviews. |
2 | The fees included under “Tax Fees” are fees associated with tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning, including services relating to the filing or amendment of federal, state or local income tax returns, regulated investment company qualification reviews and tax distribution and analysis. |
3 | The fees included under “All Other Fees” are fees for products and services provided by Deloitte other than those reported under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees,” including fees for services related to review of internal controls and review of Rule 38a-1 compliance program. |
4 | The fees under “All Other Fees” are fees for products and services provided by E&Y other than those reported under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees”. |
Item 4(e)(1):
Set forth below are the policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee of the Board of Trustees relating to the pre-approval of audit and non-audit related services:
To the extent required by applicable law, pre-approval by the Audit Committee of the Board is needed for all audit and permissible non-audit services rendered to the Funds and all permissible non-audit services rendered to MFS or MFS Related Entities if the services relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant. Pre-approval is currently on an engagement-by-engagement basis. In the event pre-approval of such services is necessary between regular meetings of the Audit Committee and it is not practical to wait to seek pre-approval at the next regular meeting of the Audit Committee, pre-approval of such services may be referred to the Chair of the Audit Committee for approval; provided that the Chair may not pre-approve any individual engagement for such services exceeding $50,000 or multiple engagements for such services in the aggregate exceeding $100,000 in each period between regular meetings of the Audit Committee. Any engagement pre-approved by the Chair between regular meetings of the Audit Committee shall be presented for ratification by the entire Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
Item 4(e)(2):
None, or 0%, of the services relating to the Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees paid by the Fund and MFS and MFS Related Entities relating directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant disclosed above were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraphs (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (which permits audit committee approval after the start of the engagement with respect to services other than audit, review or attest services, if certain conditions are satisfied).
Item 4(f): Not applicable.
Item 4(h): The Registrant’s Audit Committee has considered whether the provision by a Registrant’s independent registered public accounting firm of non-audit services to MFS and MFS Related Entities that were not pre-approved by the Committee (because such services did not relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Registrant) was compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm as the Registrant’s principal auditors.
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
A schedule of investments of each series of the Registrant is included as part of the report to shareholders of such series under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS. |
Not applicable to the Registrant.
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may send recommendations to the Board for nominees to the Registrant’s Board since the Registrant last provided disclosure as to such procedures in response to the requirements of Item 407 (c)(2)(iv) of Regulation S-K or this Item.
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. |
(a) | Based upon their evaluation of the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “Act”)) as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this report on Form N-CSR, the registrant’s principal financial officer and principal executive officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by the report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
(a) | File the exhibits listed below as part of this form. Letter or number the exhibits in the sequence indicated. |
| (1) | Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Code of Ethics attached hereto. |
| (2) | A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2): Attached hereto. |
(b) | If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)), Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference: Attached hereto. |
Notice
A copy of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, as amended, of the Registrant is on file with the Secretary of State of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts and notice is hereby given that this instrument is executed on behalf of the Registrant by an officer of the Registrant as an officer and not individually and the obligations of or arising out of this instrument are not binding upon any of the Trustees or shareholders individually, but are binding only upon the assets and property of the respective constituent series of the Registrant.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Rent) MFS SERIES TRUST VIII
| | |
By (Signature and Title)* | | JOHN M. CORCORAN |
| | John M. Corcoran, President |
Date: December 19, 2013
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | |
By (Signature and Title)* | | JOHN M. CORCORAN |
| | John M. Corcoran, President (Principal Executive Officer) |
Date: December 19, 2013
| | |
By (Signature and Title)* | | DAVID L. DILORENZO |
| | David L. DiLorenzo, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Accounting Officer) |
Date: December 19, 2013
* | Print name and title of each signing officer under his or her signature. |