UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT
OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-5445
Name of Registrant: Vanguard Fenway Funds
Address of Registrant:
P.O. Box 2600
Valley Forge, PA 19482
Name and address of agent for service:
Heidi Stam, Esquire
P.O. Box 876
Valley Forge, PA 19482
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (610) 669-1000
Date of fiscal year end: September 30
Date of reporting period: October 1, 2008– March 31, 2009
Item 1: Reports to Shareholders
> Vanguard Equity Income Fund returned about –31% for the fiscal half-year ended March 31, 2009. The fund’s disappointing return was a bit better than that of its benchmark index, and a bit below the average return of competing funds.
> The fund faced significant headwinds from steep declines in the stock market during the six-month period.
> The fund’s stock selection in the financial, utilities, and energy sectors helped its performance relative to its benchmark index.
Contents |
|
|
|
Your Fund’s Total Returns | 1 |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Advisors’ Report | 7 |
Fund Profile | 10 |
Performance Summary | 11 |
Financial Statements | 12 |
About Your Fund’s Expenses | 24 |
Trustees Approve Advisory Arrangements | 26 |
Glossary | 28 |
Please note: The opinions expressed in this report are just that—informed opinions. They should not be considered promises or advice. Also, please keep in mind that the information and opinions cover the period through the date on the front of this report. Of course, the risks of investing in your fund are spelled out in the prospectus.
Your Fund’s Total Returns
Six Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
| Ticker | Total |
| Symbol | Returns |
Investor Shares | VEIPX | –30.90% |
AdmiralTM Shares1 | VEIRX | –30.87 |
FTSE High Dividend Yield Index |
| –33.13 |
Average Equity Income Fund2 |
| –29.35 |
Your Fund’s Performance at a Glance |
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008–March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Distributions Per Share | |
| Starting | Ending | Income | Capital |
| Share Price | Share Price | Dividends | Gains |
Vanguard Equity Income Fund |
|
|
|
|
Investor Shares | $20.02 | $13.43 | $0.343 | $0.112 |
Admiral Shares | 41.97 | 28.15 | 0.739 | 0.235 |
1 A lower-cost class of shares available to many longtime shareholders and to those with significant investments in the fund.
2 Derived from data provided by Lipper Inc.
1
President’s Letter
Dear Shareholder,
For the fiscal half-year ended March 31, 2009, Vanguard Equity Income Fund returned about –31%. Although the fund’s result was disappointing, it was ahead of that of its benchmark index, the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. The fund trailed the average return of equity income funds.
The treacherous market environment during the period left many of the fund’s blue-chip stocks facing losses and cutting their dividend payouts. The fund’s absolute return was depressed by its stakes in the financial, industrial, and consumer staples sectors.
As of March 31, the Equity Income Fund’s 30-day SEC yield stood at 4.09% for Investor Shares and 4.22% for Admiral Shares, about 1.5 percentage points more than the broad stock market’s yield.
Extreme distress dappled with glimmers of hope
The six months ended March 31 witnessed extreme distress in global stock markets, with both U.S. and international stocks returning about –31%. The embattled financial sector continued to struggle, prompting regulators in the United States and abroad to take evermore-aggressive actions to help the big banks fortify their fragile balance sheets.
Even as the gloom intensified, a few signs of recovery appeared on the horizon. Toward the end of the period, the swift contraction in manufacturing activity
2
seemed to lessen. And throughout the six months, news from the housing sector seemed to improve. From their lows in early March through the end of the period, global stock markets generated a double-digit return.
Credit-market turmoil provoked dramatic response
Developments in the fixed income market were, if anything, even more unusual. In the months after the September collapse of Lehman Brothers, a major presence in the bond market, trading of corporate bonds came to a near standstill as investors stampeded into U.S. Treasury bonds—considered the safest, most liquid credits—driving prices higher and yields lower. The difference between the yields of Treasuries and corporate bonds surged to levels not seen since the 1930s.
The Federal Reserve Board responded to the credit-market and economic crises with a dramatic easing of monetary policy, reducing its target for short-term interest rates to an all-time low of 0% to 0.25%. The Fed also created new programs designed to bring borrowers and lenders back to the market. For the six-month period, the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index returned 4.70% on the strength of Treasuries and other government-backed bonds. The broad municipal bond market returned 5.00%.
Market Barometer |
|
|
|
| Total Returns | ||
| Periods Ended March 31, 2009 | ||
| Six Months | One Year | Five Years1 |
Stocks |
|
|
|
Russell 1000 Index (Large-caps) | –30.59% | –38.27% | –4.54% |
Russell 2000 Index (Small-caps) | –37.17 | –37.50 | –5.24 |
Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Index (Entire market) | –30.72 | –37.69 | –4.24 |
MSCI All Country World Index ex USA (International) | –30.54 | –46.18 | –0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds |
|
|
|
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (Broad taxable market) | 4.70% | 3.13% | 4.13% |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | 5.00 | 2.27 | 3.21 |
Citigroup 3-Month Treasury Bill Index | 0.30 | 1.13 | 3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPI |
|
|
|
Consumer Price Index | –2.78 | –0.38 | 2.57 |
1 Annualized.
3
Stock selection helped a bit in a very tough environment
The Equity Income Fund’s objective is to invest in large-capitalization value companies with above-average dividend yields. Like most strategies, this blue-chip, dividend-oriented approach faced big obstacles during the past six months. Each of the fund’s industry sectors posted negative returns, with nine out of ten sectors reporting double-digit declines.
The fund’s holdings in financials, which accounted for roughly one-fifth of its assets, on average, during the six months, returned –52% for the period. As large commercial and investment banks reeled from the credit crisis last fall, the sector shaved 13 percentage points from the fund’s return. Industrial and consumer staples stocks also contributed to the fund’s weak showing. A slump in manufacturing hurt large industrial conglomerates, including those involved in the aerospace and consumer-electronics industry. And in consumer staples, the fund missed out on relatively strong performances from certain defensive stocks such as large beverage manufacturers, which dampened the fund’s results in the sector.
Compared with the index, the fund benefited from good stock selection in the energy, utilities, and, surprisingly, financial sectors. The fund’s advisors’ decision to invest in British and French crude oil and gas companies, which are not included in the benchmark index, helped temper the fund’s losses in the energy area. An
Expense Ratios1 |
|
|
|
Your Fund Compared With Its Peer Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Investor | Admiral | Average Equity |
| Shares | Shares | Income Fund |
Equity Income Fund | 0.37% | 0.24% | 1.34% |
1 The fund expense ratios shown are from the prospectus dated January 15, 2009, and represent estimated costs for the current fiscal year based on the fund’s current net assets. For the six months ended March 31, 2009, the annualized expense ratios were 0.37% for Investor Shares and 0.24% for Admiral Shares. The peer-group expense ratio is derived from data provided by Lipper Inc. and captures information through year-end 2008.
4
overweighted position in utilities (on average) versus the index also boosted the fund’s relative performance.
Ironically, the advisors’ stock selections in financials—the fund’s worst-performing group—played a significant role in pushing the fund’s overall return ahead of the benchmark index. The fund’s smaller stake in some troubled banks relative to the benchmark proved to be a wise choice.
As several high-profile companies slashed their dividends to help conserve cash at a bad time for raising new capital, the fund’s distributions to shareholders declined compared with the same period a year ago.
Diversification is essential in turbulent markets
The stock market’s performance during the fiscal half-year has many investors feeling anxious about their investments. It’s easy to feel discouraged, as the markets have been bruised and battered. But seasoned investors understand that the market’s occasionally frightening declines are an unavoidable trade-off for its potential to produce superior returns in the long term.
Investment insight
Lower expenses can mean more income
An equity income fund’s dividend yield depends, obviously, on the yields of the securities in its portfolio. A less visible, but critical, determinant of the fund’s yield is the fund’s expense ratio.
Consider two hypothetical funds: the Lower Cost Fund and the Higher Cost Fund. Both funds hold identical portfolios of securities, and before costs, each fund yields 4%.
The Lower Cost Fund charges annualized expenses equal to 0.50% of assets, providing shareholders with a yield of 3.50%. The Higher Cost Fund charges 1.50% of assets, reducing the fund’s yield to 2.50%.
Same portfolios, very different yields. The difference is cost.
| Yield |
| Yield |
| Before | Expense | Net of |
| Expenses | Ratio | Expenses |
Lower Cost |
|
|
|
Fund | 4.00% | 0.50% | 3.50% |
Higher Cost |
|
|
|
Fund | 4.00 | 1.50 | 2.50 |
This hypothetical example is not meant to represent any particular investment.
5
At Vanguard, we counsel you, the investor, to build a portfolio that is diversified across stock, bond, and money market funds and fits your goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. Of course, we have seen that even the most balanced portfolios aren’t immune to difficult market conditions such as those of the past six months.
Still, we believe that broad diversification among and within asset classes is the right long-term policy and can position you to weather the occasional storm while helping you benefit from an inevitable return to better times. Vanguard Equity
Income Fund, with its emphasis on large, stable, dividend-paying companies, can play an important role in such a diversified portfolio.
Thank you for entrusting your assets to Vanguard.
Sincerely,
F. William McNabb III
President and Chief Executive Officer
February 12, 2009
6
Advisors’ Report
For the six months ended March 31, 2009, the Investor Shares of Vanguard Equity Income Fund returned –30.90% and the lower-cost Admiral Shares returned –30.87%. Your fund is managed by two independent advisors. This provides exposure to distinct, yet complementary, investment approaches, enhancing the fund’s diversification.
The advisors, the percentage of the fund’s assets each manages, and brief descriptions of their investment strategies are presented in the table below. Each advisor has also prepared a discussion of the investment environment that existed during the fiscal half-year and of how the portfolio positioning reflects this assessment. These comments were prepared on April 27, 2009.
Wellington Management Company, LLP
Portfolio Manager:
W. Michael Reckmeyer III,
CFA, Senior Vice President
U.S. economic activity has continued to decelerate over the fiscal half-year, with the nation now in the midst of one of the worst recessions since the Great Depression. Consumers remain under considerable stress owing to rising unemployment rates, tightening credit availability, and the greatest loss of financial wealth in recent history. Corporations are under pressure due to revenue weakness, eroding profitability, and difficulty in obtaining financing. The federal government has responded to this crisis by adding fiscal stimulus as well as creating numerous financial programs in an attempt
Vanguard Equity Income Fund Investment Advisors |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| Fund Assets Managed |
| |
Investment Advisor | % | $ Million | Investment Strategy |
Wellington Management | 61 | 1,797 | A fundamental approach to seeking desirable stocks. |
Company, LLP |
|
| Our selections typically offer above-average dividend |
|
|
| yields, below-average valuations, and the potential for |
|
|
| dividend increases in the future. |
Vanguard Quantitative | 37 | 1,109 | Quantitative management with the primary |
Equity Group |
|
| assessment of a company’s future prospects made |
|
|
| by analyzing its current valuation, sentiment, and |
|
|
| earnings-quality characteristics. |
Cash Investments | 2 | 67 | These short-term reserves are invested by Vanguard |
|
|
| in equity index products to simulate investment in |
|
|
| stocks. Each advisor also may maintain a modest |
|
|
| cash position. |
7
to unlock the credit markets. We remain hopeful that these programs will continue to gain momentum, and we are cautiously optimistic that economic growth will start to improve in the second half of 2009.
Internationally, most major economies are in, or close to, a recession, driven by the global credit contraction, collapsing commodity prices, and a decline in global trade. Stimulus plans have also been announced in most major economies in an attempt to mute the impact of the recessionary conditions.
We remain cautious on the financial sector and have reduced our exposure since the beginning of the year. Credit costs continue to increase, exerting downward pressure on earnings and dividends of various financial institutions, as evidenced by the higher frequency of dividend cuts over the latest quarter. We continue to focus on companies with solid balance sheets, above-market growth rates, sustainable dividend yields, and valuations at a discount to the market.
Our largest purchases over the past six months ended March 31 included pharmaceuticals companies Johnson & Johnson and Merck; financial companies Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs Group; and technology company Microsoft. Our sales included names that reached or approached our target prices, such as Abbott Laboratories, General Mills, and Baxter, as well as names with fundamental disappointments, such as U.S. Bancorp, Bank of America, and Dow Chemical.
Vanguard Quantitative Equity Group
Portfolio Manager:
James P. Stetler, Principal
The equity market’s negative momentum from 2008 continued through most of the first calendar quarter, with high-yielding equities falling another –17% as measured by the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. That brought the decline of the benchmark for the six-month period to more than –33%.The first two months of 2009 had the worst results of the fiscal half-year, with our benchmark down more than –24%. The market’s reaction to the government’s initial stimulus announcements was not positive.
However, as additional plans were revealed, March brought about a turnaround from January and February, with a broad-market rebound. Whether or not we have reached a market bottom remains to be seen.
It has been an extraordinary six months for dividend-paying stocks. Many companies have eliminated dividends or reduced their payouts significantly. Within the FTSE High Dividend Yield benchmark alone, approximately 40 companies have eliminated their dividends since the beginning of 2009, and many more have drastically cut their payouts.
8
Our portion of the fund’s performance relative to its benchmark derives from our ability to accurately rank stocks against their industry and market-cap peers, predicting the outperformers from the underperformers and effectively implementing those decisions in our portfolio. This evaluation process analyzes companies among several criteria: relative valuation characteristics, market sentiment/momentum factors, the quality and direction of earnings, and management decisions on certain company attributes. In short, we prefer stocks with attractive valuations, good market sentiment, and strong balance-sheet quality.
For the six months, our models were able to marginally add value, mainly by identifying the worst-performing stocks in certain sectors, which the portfolio then avoided or underweighted. Our stock selection was strongest in financials, as we underweighted some of the sector’s poorest performers such as Bank of America, Citigroup, and Allstate. We also benefited from our overweighting of Morgan Stanley. Selection results were disappointing in the consumer staples, industrial, and materials sectors. Holdings in SuperValu, Pacer International, and Eastman Chemical did not perform as expected and detracted from our results.
9
Equity Income Fund
Fund Profile
As of March 31, 2009
Portfolio Characteristics |
|
| |
|
| Comparative | Broad |
| Fund | Index1 | Index2 |
Number of Stocks | 165 | 503 | 4,489 |
Median Market Cap | $39.8B | $39.8B | $22.3B |
Price/Earnings Ratio | 11.0x | 13.6x | 15.0x |
Price/Book Ratio | 1.6x | 1.4x | 1.7x |
Yield3 |
| 4.6% | 2.7% |
Investor Shares | 4.1% |
|
|
Admiral Shares | 4.2% |
|
|
Return on Equity | 21.3% | 19.6% | 20.2% |
Earnings Growth Rate | 9.4% | 6.6% | 15.0% |
Foreign Holdings | 4.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Turnover Rate4 | 63% | — | — |
Expense Ratio5 |
| — | — |
Investor Shares | 0.37% |
|
|
Admiral Shares | 0.24% |
|
|
Short-Term Reserves | 0.6% | — | — |
Sector Diversification (% of equity exposure) | |||
|
| Comparative | Broad |
| Fund | Index1 | Index2 |
Consumer Discretionary | 8.6% | 7.6% | 9.4% |
Consumer Staples | 12.5 | 11.8 | 11.2 |
Energy | 10.4 | 8.3 | 12.3 |
Financials | 15.6 | 17.4 | 13.1 |
Health Care | 14.0 | 14.2 | 14.6 |
Industrials | 12.0 | 12.8 | 10.0 |
Information Technology | 6.1 | 5.2 | 17.7 |
Materials | 3.6 | 3.9 | 3.7 |
Telecommunication |
|
|
|
Services | 7.1 | 8.4 | 3.6 |
Utilities | 10.1 | 10.4 | 4.4 |
Volatility Measures6 |
| |
| Fund Versus | Fund Versus |
| Comparative Index1 | Broad Index2 |
R-Squared | 0.99 | 0.89 |
Beta | 0.91 | 0.88 |
Ten Largest Holdings7 (% of total net assets) | ||
|
|
|
Chevron Corp. | integrated oil |
|
| and gas | 4.7% |
AT&T Inc. | integrated |
|
| telecommunication |
|
| services | 4.2 |
Johnson & Johnson | pharmaceuticals | 3.9 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | diversified financial |
|
| services | 3.0 |
Pfizer Inc. | pharmaceuticals | 2.7 |
Merck & Co., Inc. | pharmaceuticals | 2.7 |
Verizon | integrated |
|
Communications Inc. | telecommunication |
|
| services | 2.5 |
Home Depot, Inc. | home improvement |
|
| retail | 2.3 |
Intel Corp. | semiconductors | 2.3 |
FPL Group, Inc. | electric utilities | 2.2 |
Top Ten |
| 30.5% |
Investment Focus
1 FTSE High Dividend Yield Index.
2 Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Index.
3 30-day SEC yield for the fund; annualized dividend yield for the indexes. See the Glossary.
4 Annualized.
5 The expense ratios shown are from the prospectus dated January 15, 2009, and represent estimated costs for the current fiscal year based on the fund’s current net assets. For the six months ended March 31, 2009, the annualized expense ratios were 0.37% for Investor Shares and 0.24% for Admiral Shares.
6 For an explanation of R-squared, beta, and other terms used here, see the Glossary.
7 The holdings listed exclude any temporary cash investments and equity index products.
10
Equity Income Fund
Performance Summary
All of the returns in this report represent past performance, which is not a guarantee of future results that may be achieved by the fund. (Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data cited. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit our website at www.vanguard.com/performance.) Note, too, that both investment returns and principal value can fluctuate widely, so an investor’s shares, when sold, could be worth more or less than their original cost. The returns shown do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the sale of fund shares.
Fiscal-Year Total Returns (%): September 30, 1998–March 31, 2009.
Average Annual Total Returns: Periods Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Inception Date | One Year | Five Years | Ten Years |
Investor Shares | 03/21/1988 | –37.15% | –2.96% | 0.31% |
Admiral Shares | 08/13/2001 | –37.05 | –2.84 | –1.104 |
1 Six months ended March 31, 2008.
2 Total returns do not include the account service fee that may be applicable to certain accounts with balances below $10,000.
3 Russell 1000 Value Index through July 31, 2007; FTSE High Dividend Yield Index thereafter.
4 Return since inception.
Note: See Financial Highlights tables for dividend and capital gains information.
11
Equity Income Fund
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Statement of Net Assets
As of March 31, 2009
The fund provides a complete list of its holdings four times in each fiscal year, at the quarter-ends. For the second and fourth fiscal quarters, the lists appear in the fund’s semiannual and annual reports to shareholders. For the first and third fiscal quarters, the fund files the lists with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form N-Q. Shareholders can look up the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room (see the back cover of this report for further information).
|
|
| Market |
|
|
| Value• |
|
| Shares | ($000) |
Common Stocks (97.8%)1 |
|
| |
Consumer Discretionary (8.3%) |
|
| |
| Home Depot, Inc. | 2,959,500 | 69,726 |
| Genuine Parts Co. | 1,174,900 | 35,082 |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 433,805 | 23,673 |
^ | Nordstrom, Inc. | 1,266,600 | 21,216 |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | 380,900 | 19,795 |
| VF Corp. | 266,000 | 15,191 |
| The Stanley Works | 458,500 | 13,352 |
| The McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc. | 384,000 | 8,782 |
| H & R Block, Inc. | 387,400 | 7,047 |
| Fortune Brands, Inc. | 220,000 | 5,401 |
| Macy’s Inc. | 552,200 | 4,915 |
| Hasbro, Inc. | 194,800 | 4,884 |
| Darden Restaurants Inc. | 125,000 | 4,282 |
| Black & Decker Corp. | 107,300 | 3,386 |
| D. R. Horton, Inc. | 301,700 | 2,926 |
| Limited Brands, Inc. | 309,800 | 2,695 |
| Lennar Corp. Class A | 233,000 | 1,750 |
| Cracker Barrel Old |
|
|
| Country Store Inc. | 54,700 | 1,567 |
| Oxford Industries, Inc. | 116,800 | 721 |
| National Presto |
|
|
| Industries, Inc. | 6,000 | 366 |
| Whirlpool Corp. | 7,200 | 213 |
|
|
| 246,970 |
Consumer Staples (12.1%) |
|
| |
| Philip Morris |
|
|
| International Inc. | 1,734,255 | 61,705 |
| Nestle SA ADR | 1,456,100 | 48,801 |
| Altria Group, Inc. | 2,600,555 | 41,661 |
| Kimberly-Clark Corp. | 774,075 | 35,692 |
| The Coca-Cola Co. | 732,082 | 32,175 |
| PepsiCo, Inc. | 510,300 | 26,270 |
| Sysco Corp. | 1,098,288 | 25,041 |
| Lorillard, Inc. | 265,000 | 16,361 |
| Unilever NV ADR | 778,200 | 15,253 |
| Kraft Foods Inc. | 581,689 | 12,966 |
| Diageo PLC ADR | 260,050 | 11,637 |
| ConAgra Foods, Inc. | 667,400 | 11,259 |
| H.J. Heinz Co. | 219,200 | 7,247 |
| The Hershey Co. | 161,500 | 5,612 |
| Avon Products, Inc. | 191,300 | 3,679 |
| Reynolds American Inc. | 68,800 | 2,466 |
| The Procter & Gamble Co. | 41,260 | 1,943 |
| Kellogg Co. | 22,700 | 831 |
|
|
| 360,599 |
Energy (9.9%) |
|
| |
| Chevron Corp. | 2,061,900 | 138,642 |
| Total SA ADR | 770,300 | 37,791 |
| ConocoPhillips Co. | 956,300 | 37,449 |
| Marathon Oil Corp. | 1,149,300 | 30,215 |
| BP PLC ADR | 622,600 | 24,966 |
| Valero Energy Corp. | 427,000 | 7,643 |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 103,800 | 5,777 |
| EnCana Corp. |
|
|
| (New York Shares) | 104,500 | 4,244 |
| Tesoro Corp. | 177,000 | 2,384 |
| Knightsbridge Tankers Ltd. | 128,210 | 1,866 |
| Sunoco, Inc. | 67,300 | 1,782 |
| Spectra Energy Corp. | 67,700 | 957 |
|
|
| 293,716 |
Exchange-Traded Fund (1.1%) |
|
| |
2 | Vanguard Value ETF | 963,400 | 32,621 |
|
|
|
|
Financials (15.1%) |
|
| |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 3,393,500 | 90,199 |
| Wells Fargo & Co. | 3,564,773 | 50,762 |
| Bank of New York |
|
|
| Mellon Corp. | 1,351,170 | 38,171 |
| The Chubb Corp. | 877,062 | 37,117 |
| The Goldman Sachs |
|
|
| Group, Inc. | 274,000 | 29,049 |
| Ace Ltd. | 651,700 | 26,329 |
| PNC Financial |
|
|
| Services Group | 867,300 | 25,403 |
| Unum Group | 1,242,100 | 15,526 |
| The Allstate Corp. | 783,300 | 15,000 |
12
Equity Income Fund
|
| Market |
|
| Value• |
| Shares | ($000) |
The Travelers Cos., Inc. | 310,800 | 12,631 |
Bank of America Corp. | 1,412,128 | 9,631 |
Toronto Dominion Bank | 270,300 | 9,347 |
BB&T Corp. | 502,400 | 8,501 |
New York Community |
|
|
Bancorp, Inc. | 633,400 | 7,075 |
U.S. Bancorp | 481,336 | 7,032 |
Axis Capital Holdings Ltd. | 283,400 | 6,388 |
Cincinnati Financial Corp. | 279,200 | 6,385 |
Hudson City Bancorp, Inc. | 491,600 | 5,747 |
Morgan Stanley | 232,500 | 5,294 |
Federated Investors, Inc. | 226,857 | 5,050 |
Bank of Hawaii Corp. | 142,500 | 4,700 |
FirstMerit Corp. | 250,800 | 4,565 |
IPC Holdings Ltd. | 159,400 | 4,310 |
NYSE Euronext | 231,100 | 4,137 |
MetLife, Inc. | 166,700 | 3,796 |
NBT Bancorp, Inc. | 156,258 | 3,381 |
Safety Insurance Group, Inc. | 92,400 | 2,872 |
American Express Co. | 201,800 | 2,751 |
Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 133,500 | 2,735 |
First BanCorp Puerto Rico | 478,800 | 2,040 |
Aspen Insurance |
|
|
Holdings Ltd. | 66,300 | 1,489 |
Pacific Capital Bancorp | 141,548 | 958 |
Popular, Inc. | 293,361 | 639 |
Marsh & McLennan |
|
|
Cos., Inc. | 12,300 | 249 |
|
| 449,259 |
Health Care (13.5%) |
|
|
Johnson & Johnson | 2,198,105 | 115,620 |
Pfizer Inc. | 5,809,431 | 79,125 |
Merck & Co., Inc. | 2,953,714 | 79,012 |
Wyeth | 978,398 | 42,110 |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 1,511,332 | 33,128 |
Eli Lilly & Co. | 930,949 | 31,103 |
GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR | 732,600 | 22,762 |
|
| 402,860 |
Industrials (11.7%) |
|
|
General Electric Co. | 6,412,772 | 64,833 |
Waste Management, Inc. | 1,570,100 | 40,195 |
3M Co. | 748,400 | 37,210 |
Eaton Corp. | 627,300 | 23,122 |
Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | 735,300 | 22,684 |
Republic Services, Inc. |
|
|
Class A | 1,254,200 | 21,510 |
PACCAR, Inc. | 750,900 | 19,343 |
Caterpillar, Inc. | 552,700 | 15,453 |
Honeywell International Inc. | 456,162 | 12,709 |
Norfolk Southern Corp. | 348,700 | 11,769 |
Northrop Grumman Corp. | 207,813 | 9,069 |
Emerson Electric Co. | 287,000 | 8,202 |
Pitney Bowes, Inc. | 320,900 | 7,493 |
Schneider Electric SA | 111,384 | 7,408 |
Dover Corp. | 279,500 | 7,373 |
Briggs & Stratton Corp. | 416,400 | 6,871 |
United Parcel Service, Inc. | 119,900 | 5,901 |
The Boeing Co. | 164,100 | 5,839 |
GATX Corp. | 181,576 | 3,673 |
Raytheon Co. | 80,400 | 3,131 |
Federal Signal Corp. | 527,315 | 2,779 |
The Timken Co. | 181,500 | 2,534 |
Apogee Enterprises, Inc. | 220,864 | 2,425 |
Deere & Co. | 57,900 | 1,903 |
Tyco International Ltd. | 94,000 | 1,839 |
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. | 62,400 | 1,187 |
The Standard Register Co. | 109,700 | 502 |
|
| 346,957 |
Information Technology (5.8%) |
|
|
Intel Corp. | 4,588,300 | 69,054 |
Microsoft Corp. | 3,030,600 | 55,672 |
Texas Instruments, Inc. | 1,095,200 | 18,082 |
Analog Devices, Inc. | 531,200 | 10,236 |
Automatic Data |
|
|
Processing, Inc. | 279,800 | 9,838 |
Xilinx, Inc. | 257,400 | 4,932 |
Diebold, Inc. | 211,300 | 4,511 |
|
| 172,325 |
Materials (3.5%) |
|
|
E.I. du Pont de |
|
|
Nemours & Co. | 1,259,627 | 28,127 |
Packaging Corp. |
|
|
of America | 1,331,300 | 17,334 |
Air Products & |
|
|
Chemicals, Inc. | 301,700 | 16,971 |
PPG Industries, Inc. | 394,000 | 14,539 |
Eastman Chemical Co. | 166,600 | 4,465 |
Dow Chemical Co. | 528,900 | 4,459 |
Compass Minerals |
|
|
International, Inc. | 71,500 | 4,030 |
Olin Corp. | 274,400 | 3,916 |
United States Steel Corp. | 143,100 | 3,024 |
Glatfelter | 472,000 | 2,945 |
Stepan Co. | 74,000 | 2,020 |
Bemis Co., Inc. | 82,800 | 1,736 |
Worthington Industries, Inc. | 68,700 | 598 |
Innophos Holdings Inc. | 16,755 | 189 |
|
| 104,353 |
Telecommunication Services (6.9%) |
|
|
AT&T Inc. | 4,996,405 | 125,909 |
Verizon |
|
|
Communications Inc. | 2,440,728 | 73,710 |
Embarq Corp. | 138,355 | 5,237 |
Windstream Corp. | 30,100 | 243 |
|
| 205,099 |
Utilities (9.9%) |
|
|
FPL Group, Inc. | 1,313,666 | 66,642 |
Dominion Resources, Inc. | 1,569,230 | 48,630 |
13
Equity Income Fund
|
|
| Market |
|
|
| Value• |
|
| Shares | ($000) |
| Consolidated Edison Inc. | 592,900 | 23,485 |
| Entergy Corp. | 331,000 | 22,538 |
| American Electric |
|
|
| Power Co., Inc. | 769,000 | 19,425 |
| Exelon Corp. | 337,600 | 15,324 |
| SCANA Corp. | 391,200 | 12,084 |
| Duke Energy Corp. | 702,534 | 10,060 |
| Public Service |
|
|
| Enterprise Group, Inc. | 318,820 | 9,395 |
| PG&E Corp. | 234,100 | 8,947 |
| FirstEnergy Corp. | 223,100 | 8,612 |
| Sempra Energy | 179,500 | 8,300 |
| Edison International | 243,000 | 7,001 |
| UGI Corp. Holding Co. | 256,700 | 6,061 |
| CenterPoint Energy Inc. | 562,900 | 5,871 |
| Atmos Energy Corp. | 219,410 | 5,073 |
| DTE Energy Co. | 174,500 | 4,834 |
| Progress Energy, Inc. | 122,500 | 4,442 |
| Southern Co. | 98,000 | 3,001 |
| Avista Corp. | 211,500 | 2,914 |
| NiSource, Inc. | 56,500 | 554 |
|
|
| 293,193 |
Total Common Stocks |
|
| |
(Cost $3,715,947) |
| 2,907,952 | |
Temporary Cash Investments (1.9%)1 |
|
| |
Money Market Fund (0.6%) |
|
| |
3,4 | Vanguard Market Liquidity |
|
|
| Fund, 0.440% | 19,638,003 | 19,638 |
|
| Face | Market |
|
| Amount | Value• |
|
| ($000) | ($000) |
Repurchase Agreement (0.7%) |
|
| |
| JPMorgan Securities Inc. |
|
|
| 0.240%, 4/1/09 |
|
|
| (Dated 3/31/09, |
|
|
| Repurchase Value |
|
|
| $19,700,000, |
|
|
| collateralized by |
|
|
| Federal Home Loan |
|
|
| Mortgage Corp. |
|
|
| 0.000%, |
|
|
| 8/1/36–6/1/37) | 19,700 | 19,700 |
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations (0.6%) | |||
5,6 | Federal Home |
|
|
| Loan Mortgage Corp., |
|
|
| 0.230%, 4/17/09 | 3,000 | 3,000 |
5,6 | Federal Home |
|
|
| Loan Mortgage Corp., |
|
|
| 1.206%, 4/30/09 | 11,500 | 11,500 |
5,6 | Federal Home |
|
|
| Loan Mortgage Corp., |
|
|
| 0.320%, 5/26/09 | 3,000 | 2,999 |
|
|
| 17,499 |
Total Temporary Cash Investments |
| ||
(Cost $56,825) |
| 56,837 | |
Total Investments (99.7%) |
|
| |
(Cost $3,772,772) |
| 2,964,789 | |
Other Assets and Liabilities (0.3%) |
| ||
Other Assets |
| 41,122 | |
Liabilities4 |
| (33,390) | |
|
|
| 7,732 |
Net Assets (100%) |
| 2,972,521 |
14
Equity Income Fund
At March 31, 2009, net assets consisted of: | |
| Amount |
| ($000) |
Paid-in Capital | 4,494,392 |
Overdistributed Net Investment Income | (7,779) |
Accumulated Net Realized Losses | (709,550) |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|
Investment Securities | (807,983) |
Futures Contracts | 3,441 |
Net Assets | 2,972,521 |
|
|
|
|
Investor Shares—Net Assets |
|
Applicable to 136,613,975 outstanding |
|
$.001 par value shares of beneficial |
|
interest (unlimited authorization) | 1,834,961 |
Net Asset Value Per Share— |
|
Investor Shares | $13.43 |
|
|
|
|
Admiral Shares—Net Assets |
|
Applicable to 40,407,341 outstanding |
|
$.001 par value shares of beneficial |
|
interest (unlimited authorization) | 1,137,560 |
Net Asset Value Per Share— |
|
Admiral Shares | $28.15 |
• See Note A in Notes to Financial Statements.
^ Part of security position is on loan to broker-dealers. The total value of securities on loan is $4,874,000.
1 The fund invests a portion of its cash reserves in equity markets through the use of index futures contracts. After giving effect to futures investments, the fund’s effective common stock and temporary cash investment positions represent 99.0% and 0.7%, respectively, of net assets.
2 Considered an affiliated company of the fund, as the issuer is another member of The Vanguard Group.
3 Affiliated money market fund available only to Vanguard funds and certain trusts and accounts managed by Vanguard. Rate shown is the 7-day yield.
4 Includes $5,238,000 of collateral received for securities on loan.
5 Securities with a value of $17,499,000 have been segregated as initial margin for open futures contracts.
6 The issuer operates under a congressional charter; its securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
ADR—American Depositary Receipt.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
15
Equity Income Fund
Statement of Operations
| Six Months Ended |
| March 31, 2009 |
| ($000) |
Investment Income |
|
Income |
|
Dividends 1,2 | 76,200 |
Interest2 | 662 |
Security Lending | 135 |
Total Income | 76,997 |
Expenses |
|
Investment Advisory Fees—Note B |
|
Basic Fee | 1,320 |
Performance Adjustment | 259 |
The Vanguard Group—Note C |
|
Management and Administrative—Investor Shares | 2,379 |
Management and Administrative—Admiral Shares | 722 |
Marketing and Distribution—Investor Shares | 360 |
Marketing and Distribution—Admiral Shares | 202 |
Custodian Fees | 31 |
Auditing Fees | 1 |
Shareholders’ Reports—Investor Shares | 35 |
Shareholders’ Reports—Admiral Shares | 4 |
Trustees’ Fees and Expenses | 3 |
Total Expenses | 5,316 |
Expenses Paid Indirectly | (81) |
Net Expenses | 5,235 |
Net Investment Income | 71,762 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) |
|
Investment Securities Sold | (634,873) |
Futures Contracts | (57,564) |
Foreign Currencies | (25) |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | (692,462) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|
Investment Securities | (743,460) |
Futures Contracts | 6,833 |
Foreign Currencies | 23 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | (736,604) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (1,357,304) |
1 Dividends are net of foreign withholding taxes of $222,000.
2 Dividend income, interest income, and realized net gain (loss) from affiliated companies of the fund were $778,000, $533,000, and $0, respectively.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
16
Equity Income Fund
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| March 31, |
| September 30, |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ($000) |
| ($000) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets |
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
Net Investment Income | 71,762 |
| 167,213 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | (692,462) |
| 43,919 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | (736,604) |
| (1,257,213) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (1,357,304) |
| (1,046,081) |
Distributions |
|
|
|
Net Investment Income |
|
|
|
Investor Shares | (46,054) |
| (101,519) |
Admiral Shares | (29,653) |
| (68,969) |
Realized Capital Gain1 |
|
|
|
Investor Shares | (14,956) |
| (170,339) |
Admiral Shares | (9,460) |
| (112,961) |
Total Distributions | (100,123) |
| (453,788) |
Capital Share Transactions |
|
|
|
Investor Shares | 96,449 |
| 86,183 |
Admiral Shares | (4,275) |
| 49,809 |
Net Increase (Decrease) from Capital Share Transactions | 92,174 |
| 135,992 |
Total Increase (Decrease) | (1,365,253) |
| (1,363,877) |
Net Assets |
|
|
|
Beginning of Period | 4,337,774 |
| 5,701,651 |
End of Period2 | 2,972,521 |
| 4,337,774 |
1 Includes fiscal 2009 and 2008 short-term gain distributions totaling $0 and $32,961,000, respectively. Short-term gain distributions are treated as ordinary income dividends for tax purposes.
2 Net Assets—End of Period includes undistributed (overdistributed) net investment income of ($7,779,000) and ($3,809,000).
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
17
Equity Income Fund
Financial Highlights
Investor Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ended |
|
|
| ||
For a Share Outstanding | March 31, | Year Ended September 30, | ||||
Throughout Each Period | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $20.02 | $27.01 | $25.21 | $23.73 | $22.82 | $20.11 |
Investment Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income | .326 | .770 | .733 | .703 | .653 | .576 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
on Investments | (6.461) | (5.617) | 3.215 | 2.541 | 2.069 | 3.196 |
Total from Investment Operations | (6.135) | (4.847) | 3.948 | 3.244 | 2.722 | 3.772 |
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from Net Investment Income | (.343) | (.785) | (.730) | (.710) | (.640) | (.585) |
Distributions from Realized Capital Gains | (.112) | (1.358) | (1.418) | (1.054) | (1.172) | (.477) |
Total Distributions | (.455) | (2.143) | (2.148) | (1.764) | (1.812) | (1.062) |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $13.43 | $20.02 | $27.01 | $25.21 | $23.73 | $22.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return1 | –30.90% | –18.92% | 16.29% | 14.39% | 12.27% | 19.07% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $1,835 | $2,626 | $3,445 | $3,035 | $2,934 | $2,838 |
Ratio of Total Expenses to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Net Assets2 | 0.37%3 | 0.30% | 0.29% | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
Ratio of Net Investment Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Average Net Assets | 4.28%3 | 3.30% | 2.79% | 2.94% | 2.80% | 2.61% |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 63%3 | 55% | 51% | 26% | 42% | 36% |
1 Total returns do not include the account service fee that may be applicable to certain accounts with balances below $10,000.
2 Includes performance-based investment advisory fee increases (decreases) of 0.02%, 0.00%, 0.00%, (0.01%), (0.01%), and 0.00%.
3 Annualized.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
18
Equity Income Fund
Financial Highlights
Admiral Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ended |
|
|
| ||
For a Share Outstanding | March 31, | Year Ended September 30, | ||||
Throughout Each Period | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $41.97 | $56.62 | $52.84 | $49.74 | $47.83 | $42.15 |
Investment Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income | .703 | 1.673 | 1.601 | 1.545 | 1.434 | 1.255 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
on Investments | (13.549) | (11.772) | 6.746 | 5.324 | 4.338 | 6.698 |
Total from Investment Operations | (12.846) | (10.099) | 8.347 | 6.869 | 5.772 | 7.953 |
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from Net Investment Income | (.739) | (1.705) | (1.595) | (1.560) | (1.406) | (1.273) |
Distributions from Realized Capital Gains | (.235) | (2.846) | (2.972) | (2.209) | (2.456) | (1.000) |
Total Distributions | (.974) | (4.551) | (4.567) | (3.769) | (3.862) | (2.273) |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $28.15 | $41.97 | $56.62 | $52.84 | $49.74 | $47.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return | –30.87% | –18.82% | 16.44% | 14.55% | 12.42% | 19.19% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $1,138 | $1,711 | $2,256 | $1,783 | $1,417 | $610 |
Ratio of Total Expenses to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Net Assets1 | 0.24%2 | 0.18% | 0.17% | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.22% |
Ratio of Net Investment Income to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Net Assets | 4.41%2 | 3.42% | 2.91% | 3.08% | 2.96% | 2.71% |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 63%2 | 55% | 51% | 26% | 42% | 36% |
1 Includes performance-based investment advisory fee increases (decreases) of 0.02%, 0.00%, 0.00%, (0.01%), (0.01%) and 0.00%.
2 Annualized.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
19
Equity Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements
Vanguard Equity Income Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end investment company, or mutual fund. The fund offers two classes of shares: Investor Shares and Admiral Shares. Investor Shares are available to any investor who meets the fund’s minimum purchase requirements. Admiral Shares are designed for investors who meet certain administrative, service, tenure, and account-size criteria.
A. The following significant accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles for U.S. mutual funds. The fund consistently follows such policies in preparing its financial statements.
1. Security Valuation: Securities are valued as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m., Eastern time) on the valuation date. Equity securities are valued at the latest quoted sales prices or official closing prices taken from the primary market in which each security trades; such securities not traded on the valuation date are valued at the mean of the latest quoted bid and asked prices. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or whose values have been affected by events occurring before the fund’s pricing time but after the close of the securities’ primary markets, are valued at their fair values calculated according to procedures adopted by the board of trustees. These procedures include obtaining quotations from an independent pricing service, monitoring news to identify significant market- or security-specific events, and evaluating changes in the values of foreign market proxies (for example, ADRs, futures contracts, or exchange-traded funds), between the time the foreign markets close and the fund’s pricing time. When fair-value pricing is employed, the prices of securities used by a fund to calculate its net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same securities. Investments in Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund are valued at that fund’s net asset value. Temporary cash investments acquired over 60 days to maturity are valued using the latest bid prices or using valuations based on a matrix system (which considers such factors as security prices, yields, maturities, and ratings), both as furnished by independent pricing services. Other temporary cash investments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.
2. Foreign Currency: Securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates obtained from an independent third party as of the fund’s pricing time on the valuation date. Realized gains (losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investment securities include the effects of changes in exchange rates since the securities were purchased, combined with the effects of changes in security prices. Fluctuations in the value of other assets and liabilities resulting from changes in exchange rates are recorded as unrealized foreign currency gains (losses) until the assets or liabilities are settled in cash, at which time they are recorded as realized foreign currency gains (losses).
3. Futures Contracts: The fund uses index futures contracts to a limited extent, with the objective of maintaining full exposure to the stock market while maintaining liquidity. The fund may purchase or sell futures contracts to achieve a desired level of investment, whether to accommodate portfolio turnover or cash flows from capital share transactions. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are imperfect correlation between changes in market values of stocks held by the fund and the prices of futures contracts, and the possibility of an illiquid market.
Futures contracts are valued at their quoted daily settlement prices. The aggregate principal amounts of the contracts are not recorded in the Statement of Net Assets. Fluctuations in the value of the contracts are recorded in the Statement of Net Assets as an asset (liability) and in the Statement of Operations as unrealized appreciation (depreciation) until the contracts are closed, when they are recorded as realized futures gains (losses).
20
Equity Income Fund
4. Repurchase Agreements: The fund may invest in repurchase agreements. Securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements are held by a custodian bank until the agreements mature. Each agreement requires that the market value of the collateral be sufficient to cover payments of interest and principal; however, in the event of default or bankruptcy by the other party to the agreement, retention of the collateral may be subject to legal proceedings.
5. Federal Income Taxes: The fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income. Management has analyzed the fund’s tax positions taken on federal income tax returns for all open tax years (tax years ended September 30, 2005–2008) and for the period ended March 31, 2009, and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the fund’s financial statements.
6. Distributions: Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
7. Security Lending: The fund may lend its securities to qualified institutional borrowers to earn additional income. Security loans are required to be secured at all times by collateral at least equal to the market value of securities loaned. The fund invests cash collateral received in Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund, and records a liability for the return of the collateral, during the period the securities are on loan. Security lending income represents the income earned on investing cash collateral, less expenses associated with the loan.
8. Other: Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income includes income distributions received from Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund and is accrued daily. Security transactions are accounted for on the date securities are bought or sold. Costs used to determine realized gains (losses) on the sale of investment securities are those of the specific securities sold.
Each class of shares has equal rights as to assets and earnings, except that each class separately bears certain class-specific expenses related to maintenance of shareholder accounts (included in Management and Administrative expenses) and shareholder reporting. Marketing and distribution expenses are allocated to each class of shares based on a method approved by the board of trustees. Income, other non-class-specific expenses, and gains and losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
B. Wellington Management Company, LLP, provides investment advisory services to a portion of the fund for a fee calculated at an annual percentage rate of average net assets managed by the advisor. The basic fee for Wellington Management Company, LLP, is subject to quarterly adjustments based on the fund’s performance for the preceding three years relative to the Lipper Equity Income Average for periods prior to April 1, 2008, and the new benchmark, the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, beginning April 1, 2008. The benchmark change will be fully phased in by March 2011.
The Vanguard Group provides investment advisory services to a portion of the fund on an at-cost basis; the fund paid Vanguard advisory fees of $225,000 for the six months ended March 31, 2009.
For the six months ended March 31, 2009, the investment advisory fee represented an effective annual basic rate of 0.08% of the fund’s average net assets before an increase of $259,000 (0.02%) based on performance.
C. The Vanguard Group furnishes at cost corporate management, administrative, marketing, and distribution services. The costs of such services are allocated to the fund under methods approved by the board of trustees. The fund has committed to provide up to 0.40% of its net assets in capital
21
Equity Income Fund
contributions to Vanguard. At March 31, 2009, the fund had contributed capital of $773,000 to Vanguard (included in Other Assets), representing 0.03% of the fund’s net assets and 0.31% of Vanguard’s capitalization. The fund’s trustees and officers are also directors and officers of Vanguard.
D. The fund has asked its investment advisors to direct certain security trades, subject to obtaining the best price and execution, to brokers who have agreed to rebate to the fund part of the commissions generated. Such rebates are used solely to reduce the fund’s management and administrative expenses. The fund’s custodian bank has also agreed to reduce its fees when the fund maintains cash on deposit in the non-interest-bearing custody account. For the six months ended March 31, 2009, these arrangements reduced the fund’s management and administrative expenses by $80,000 and custodian fees by $1,000. The total expense reduction represented an effective annual rate of 0.00% of the fund’s average net assets.
E. Distributions are determined on a tax basis and may differ from net investment income and realized capital gains for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statements to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain, or loss are recognized in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes; these differences will reverse at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes. The fund’s tax-basis capital gains and losses are determined only at the end of each fiscal year.
During the six months ended March 31, 2009, the fund realized net foreign currency losses of $25,000, which decreased distributable net income for tax purposes; accordingly, such losses have been reclassified from accumulated net realized losses to undistributed net investment income.
At March 31, 2009, the cost of investment securities for tax purposes was $3,772,772,000. Net unrealized depreciation of investment securities for tax purposes was $807,983,000, consisting of unrealized gains of $129,007,000 on securities that had risen in value since their purchase and $936,990,000 in unrealized losses on securities that had fallen in value since their purchase.
At March 31, 2009, the aggregate settlement value of open futures contracts expiring in June 2009 and the related unrealized appreciation (depreciation) were:
|
|
| ($000) |
| Number of | Aggregate | Unrealized |
| Long (Short) | Settlement | Appreciation |
Futures Contracts | Contracts | Value | (Depreciation) |
S&P 500 Index | 142 | 28,215 | 3,534 |
E-mini S&P 500 Index | 150 | 5,961 | (93) |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on open futures contracts is required to be treated as realized gain (loss) for tax purposes.
F. During the six months ended March 31, 2009, the fund purchased $1,166,858,000 of investment securities and sold $1,045,518,000 of investment securities, other than temporary cash investments.
22
Equity Income Fund
G. Capital share transactions for each class of shares were:
| Six Months Ended | Year Ended | |||
| March 31, 2009 | September 30, 2008 | |||
| Amount | Shares |
| Amount | Shares |
| ($000) | (000) |
| ($000) | (000) |
Investor Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued | 352,502 | 22,948 |
| 451,252 | 19,519 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 56,038 | 3,671 |
| 250,105 | 10,727 |
Redeemed | (312,091) | (21,164) |
| (615,174) | (26,649) |
Net Increase (Decrease)—Investor Shares | 96,449 | 5,455 |
| 86,183 | 3,597 |
Admiral Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued | 181,837 | 5,732 |
| 280,117 | 5,772 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 31,701 | 990 |
| 152,414 | 3,117 |
Redeemed | (217,813) | (7,091) |
| (382,722) | (7,963) |
Net Increase (Decrease)—Admiral Shares | (4,275) | (369) |
| 49,809 | 926 |
H. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“FAS 157”), “Fair Value Measurements.” FAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements in financial statements.
The various inputs that may be used to determine the value of the fund’s investments are summarized in three broad levels. The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2—Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—Significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions used to determine the fair value of investments).
The following table summarizes the fund’s investments as of March 31, 2009, based on the inputs used to value them:
| Investments | Futures |
| in Securities | Contracts |
Valuation Inputs | ($000) | ($000) |
Level 1—Quoted Prices | 2,920,182 | 3,441 |
Level 2—Other Significant Observable Inputs | 44,607 | — |
Level 3—Significant Unobservable Inputs | — | — |
Total | 2,964,789 | 3,441 |
23
About Your Fund’s Expenses
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur ongoing costs, which include costs for portfolio management, administrative services, and shareholder reports (like this one), among others. Operating expenses, which are deducted from a fund’s gross income, directly reduce the investment return of the fund.
A fund’s expenses are expressed as a percentage of its average net assets. This figure is known as the expense ratio. The following examples are intended to help you understand the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with those of other mutual funds. The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period shown and held for the entire period.
The accompanying table illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:
• Based on actual fund return. This section helps you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from the fund’s actual return, and the third column shows the dollar amount that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.
To do so, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number given for your fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period.”
• Based on hypothetical 5% yearly return. This section is intended to help you compare your fund’s costs with those of other mutual funds. It assumes that the fund had a yearly return of 5% before expenses, but that the expense ratio is unchanged. In this case—because the return used is not the fund’s actual return—the results do not apply to your investment. The example is useful in making comparisons because the Securities and Exchange Commission requires all mutual funds to calculate expenses based on a 5% return. You can assess your fund’s costs by comparing this hypothetical example with the hypothetical examples that appear in shareholder reports of other funds.
Six Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses |
| Account Value | Account Value | Paid During |
Equity Income Fund | 9/30/2008 | 3/31/2009 | Period1 |
Based on Actual Fund Return |
|
|
|
Investor Shares | $1,000.00 | $690.97 | $1.56 |
Admiral Shares | 1,000.00 | 691.30 | 1.01 |
Based on Hypothetical 5% Yearly Return |
|
|
|
Investor Shares | $1,000.00 | $1,023.09 | $1.87 |
Admiral Shares | 1,000.00 | 1,023.73 | 1.21 |
1 The calculations are based on expenses incurred in the most recent six-month period. The fund’s annualized six-month expense ratios for that period are 0.37% for Investor Shares and 0.24% for Admiral Shares. The dollar amounts shown as “Expenses Paid” are equal to the annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by the number of days in the most recent 12-month period.
24
Note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare ongoing costs only and do not reflect transaction costs incurred by the fund for buying and selling securities. Further, the expenses do not include the account service fee described in the prospectus. If such a fee were applied to your account, your costs would be higher. Your fund does not charge transaction fees, such as purchase or redemption fees, nor does it carry a “sales load.”
The calculations assume no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.
You can find more information about the fund’s expenses, including annual expense ratios, in the Financial Statements section of this report. For additional information on operating expenses and other shareholder costs, please refer to your fund’s current prospectus.
25
Trustees Approve Advisory Arrangements
The board of trustees of Vanguard Equity Income Fund has renewed the fund’s investment advisory arrangement with Wellington Management Company, LLP, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. (through its Quantitative Equity Group). The board determined that the retention of the advisors was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
The board based its decisions upon an evaluation of each advisor’s investment staff, portfolio management process, and performance. The trustees considered the factors discussed below, among others. However, no single factor determined whether the board approved the arrangements. Rather, it was the totality of the circumstances that drove the board’s decision.
Nature, extent, and quality of services
The board considered the quality of the fund’s investment management over both the short and long term, and took into account the organizational depth and stability of each firm. The board noted the following:
Wellington Management Company. Wellington Management, founded in 1928, is among the nation’s oldest and most respected institutional managers. W. Michael Reckmeyer, III, who began managing the Wellington Management portion of the fund in 2007, has over two decades of investment industry experience. The firm has provided investment advisory services to the fund since 2000. The portfolio manager is backed by a long-tenured team of research analysts who conduct detailed fundamental analysis of their respective industries and companies. Wellington Management has provided high-quality advisory services for the fund and has demonstrated strong organizational depth and stability over both the short and long term.
The Vanguard Group. Vanguard has been managing investments for more than two decades. George U. Sauter, Vanguard managing director and chief investment officer, has been in the investment management business since 1985, and has led the Quantitative Equity Group since 1987. Joel M. Dickson, head of Active Quantitative Equity Management and principal of Vanguard, has direct oversight responsibility for all active quantitative equity portfolios managed by the Quantitative Equity Group. He has managed investment portfolios since 2003 and has been with Vanguard since 1996. The Quantitative Equity Group adheres to a sound, disciplined investment management process; the team has considerable experience, stability, and depth.
The board concluded that each advisor’s experience, stability, depth, and performance, among other factors, warranted continuation of the advisory arrangements.
Investment performance
The board considered the short- and long-term performance of the fund, including any periods of outperformance or underperformance of relevant benchmarks and the fund’s peer group. The board concluded that each investment advisor has carried out its investment strategy in disciplined fashion, and that the results have allowed the fund to perform competitively against its benchmark and peer group. Information about the fund’s most recent performance can be found in the Performance Summary portion of this report.
Cost
The board concluded that the fund’s expense ratio was far below the average expense ratio charged by funds in its peer group. The board noted that the fund’s advisory fee rate was also well below the peer-group average. Information about the fund’s expense ratio appears in the About Your Fund’s Expenses section of this report as well as in the Financial Statements section, which also includes information about the advisory fee rate.
26
The board did not consider profitability of Wellington Management in determining whether to approve the advisory fee, because the firm is independent of Vanguard, and the advisory fee is the result of arm’s-length negotiations. The board does not consider a “profitability” analysis of Vanguard, because of Vanguard’s unique “at-cost” structure. Unlike most other mutual fund management companies, Vanguard is owned by the funds it oversees, and only produces “profits” in the form of reduced expenses for fund shareholders.
The benefit of economies of scale
The board concluded that the fund’s shareholders benefit from economies of scale because of breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule for Wellington Management. The breakpoints reduce the effective rate of the fee as the fund’s assets managed by Wellington Management increase. The board also concluded that the fund’s low-cost arrangement with Vanguard ensures that the fund will realize economies of scale as it grows, with the cost to shareholders declining as the fund’s assets managed by Vanguard increase.
The board will consider whether to renew the advisory arrangements again after a one-year period.
27
Glossary
Beta. A measure of the magnitude of a fund’s past share-price fluctuations in relation to the ups and downs of a given market index. The index is assigned a beta of 1.00. Compared with a given index, a fund with a beta of 1.20 typically would have seen its share price rise or fall by 12% when the index rose or fell by 10%. For this report, beta is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index. Note that a fund’s beta should be reviewed in conjunction with its R-squared (see definition). The lower the R-squared, the less correlation there is between the fund and the index, and the less reliable beta is as an indicator of volatility.
Earnings Growth Rate. The average annual rate of growth in earnings over the past five years for the stocks now in a fund.
Equity Exposure. A measure that reflects a fund’s investments in stocks and stock futures. Any holdings in short-term reserves are excluded.
Expense Ratio. The percentage of a fund’s average net assets used to pay its annual administrative and advisory expenses. These expenses directly reduce returns to investors.
Foreign Holdings. The percentage of a fund represented by stocks or depositary receipts of companies based outside the United States.
Inception Date. The date on which the assets of a fund (or one of its share classes) are first invested in accordance with the fund’s investment objective. For funds with a subscription period, the inception date is the day after that period ends. Investment performance is measured from the inception date.
Median Market Cap. An indicator of the size of companies in which a fund invests; the midpoint of market capitalization (market price x shares outstanding) of a fund’s stocks, weighted by the proportion of the fund’s assets invested in each stock. Stocks representing half of the fund’s assets have market capitalizations above the median, and the rest are below it.
Price/Book Ratio. The share price of a stock divided by its net worth, or book value, per share. For a fund, the weighted average price/book ratio of the stocks it holds.
Price/Earnings Ratio. The ratio of a stock’s current price to its per-share earnings over the past year. For a fund, the weighted average P/E of the stocks it holds. P/E is an indicator of market expectations about corporate prospects; the higher the P/E, the greater the expectations for a company’s future growth.
R-Squared. A measure of how much of a fund’s past returns can be explained by the returns from the market in general, as measured by a given index. If a fund’s total returns were precisely synchronized with an index’s returns, its R-squared would be 1.00. If the fund’s returns bore no relationship to the index’s returns, its R-squared would be 0. For this report, R-squared is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index.
Return on Equity. The annual average rate of return generated by a company during the past five years for each dollar of shareholder’s equity (net income divided by shareholder’s equity). For a fund, the weighted average return on equity for the companies whose stocks it holds.
Short-Term Reserves. The percentage of a fund invested in highly liquid, short-term securities that can be readily converted to cash.
28
Turnover Rate. An indication of the fund’s trading activity. Funds with high turnover rates incur higher transaction costs and may be more likely to distribute capital gains (which may be taxable to investors). The turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions, which have minimal impact on costs.
Yield. A fund’s 30-day SEC yield is derived using a formula specified by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the formula, data related to the fund’s security holdings in the previous 30 days are used to calculate the fund’s hypothetical net income for that period, which is then annualized and divided by the fund’s estimated average net assets over the calculation period. For the purposes of this calculation, a security’s income is based on its current market yield to maturity (in the case of bonds) or its projected dividend yield (for stocks). Because the SEC yield represents hypothetical annualized income, it will differ—at times significantly—from the fund’s actual experience. As a result, the fund’s income distributions may be higher or lower than implied by the SEC yield.
29
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank.
The People Who Govern Your Fund
The trustees of your mutual fund are there to see that the fund is operated and managed in your best interests since, as a shareholder, you are a part owner of the fund. Your fund’s trustees also serve on the board of directors of The Vanguard Group, Inc., which is owned by the Vanguard funds and provides services to them on an at-cost basis.
A majority of Vanguard’s board members are independent, meaning that they have no affiliation with Vanguard or the funds they oversee, apart from the sizable personal investments they have made as private individuals. The independent board members have distinguished backgrounds in business, academia, and public service. Each of the trustees and executive officers oversees 157 Vanguard funds.
The following table provides information for each trustee and executive officer of the fund. More information about the trustees is in the Statement of Additional Information, which can be obtained, without charge, by contacting Vanguard at 800-662-7447, or online at www.vanguard.com.
Chairman of the Board and Interested Trustee
John J. Brennan1
Born 1954. Trustee Since May 1987. Chairman of the Board. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Chairman of the Board and Director/Trustee of The Vanguard Group, Inc., and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group; Chief Executive Officer and President of The Vanguard Group and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (1996–2008).
Independent Trustees
Charles D. Ellis
Born 1937. Trustee Since January 2001. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Applecore Partners (pro bono ventures in education); Senior Advisor to Greenwich Associates (international business strategy consulting); Successor Trustee of Yale University; Overseer of the Stern School of Business at New York University; Trustee of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research.
Emerson U. Fullwood
Born 1948. Trustee Since January 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Retired Executive Chief Staff and Marketing Officer for North America and Corporate Vice President of Xerox Corporation (photocopiers and printers); Director of SPX Corporation (multi-industry manufacturing), the United Way of Rochester, the Boy Scouts of America, Amerigroup Corporation (direct health and medical insurance carriers), and Monroe Community College Foundation.
Rajiv L. Gupta
Born 1945. Trustee Since December 2001.2 Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rohm and Haas Co. (chemicals); President of Rohm and Haas Co. (2006–2008); Board Member of American Chemistry Council; Director of Tyco International, Ltd. (diversified manufacturing and services) and Hewlett-Packard Co. (electronic computer manufacturing); Trustee of The Conference Board.
Amy Gutmann
Born 1949. Trustee Since June 2006. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: President of the University of Pennsylvania; Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science in the School of Arts and Sciences with Secondary Appointments at the Annenberg School for Communication and the Graduate School of Education of the University of Pennsylvania; Director of Carnegie Corporation of New York, Schuylkill River Development Corporation, and Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce; Trustee of the National Constitution Center.
JoAnn Heffernan Heisen
Born 1950. Trustee Since July 1998. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Retired Corporate Vice President, Chief Global Diversity Officer, and Member of the Executive Committee of Johnson & Johnson (pharmaceuticals/consumer products); Vice President and Chief Information Officer (1997–2005) of Johnson & Johnson; Director of the University Medical Center at Princeton and Women’s Research and Education Institute.
André F. Perold
Born 1952. Trustee Since December 2004. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: George Gund Professor of Finance and Banking, Senior Associate Dean, and Director of Faculty Recruiting, Harvard Business School; Director and Chairman of UNX, Inc. (equities trading firm); Chair of the Investment Committee of HighVista Strategies LLC (private investment firm).
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr.
Born 1941. Trustee Since January 1993. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of NACCO Industries, Inc. (forklift trucks/housewares/ lignite); Director of Goodrich Corporation (industrial products/aircraft systems and services).
J. Lawrence Wilson
Born 1936. Trustee Since April 1985. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rohm and Haas Co. (chemicals); Director of Cummins Inc. (diesel engines) and AmerisourceBergen Corp. (pharmaceutical distribution); Trustee of Vanderbilt University and of Culver Educational Foundation.
Executive Officers
Thomas J. Higgins1
Born 1957. Chief Financial Officer Since September 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Principal of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Chief Financial Officer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2008; Treasurer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (1998–2008).
Kathryn J. Hyatt1
Born 1955. Treasurer Since November 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Principal of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Treasurer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2008; Assistant Treasurer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (1988–2008).
F. William McNabb III1
Born 1957. Chief Executive Officer Since August 2008. President Since March 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Director of The Vanguard Group, Inc., since 2008; Chief Executive Officer and President of The Vanguard Group and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2008; Director of Vanguard Marketing Corporation; Managing Director of The Vanguard Group (1995–2008).
Heidi Stam1
Born 1956. Secretary Since July 2005. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Managing Director of The Vanguard Group, Inc., since 2006; General Counsel of The Vanguard Group since 2005; Secretary of The Vanguard Group and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2005; Director and Senior Vice President of Vanguard Marketing Corporation since 2005; Principal of The Vanguard Group (1997–2006).
Vanguard Senior Management Team | |
|
|
|
|
R. Gregory Barton | Michael S. Miller |
Mortimer J. Buckley | James M. Norris |
Kathleen C. Gubanich | Glenn W. Reed |
Paul A. Heller | George U. Sauter |
Founder
John C. Bogle
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, 1974–1996
1 These individuals are “interested persons” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
2 December 2002 for Vanguard Equity Income Fund, Vanguard Growth Equity Fund, the Vanguard Municipal Bond Funds, and the Vanguard State Tax-Exempt Funds.
P.O. Box 2600
Valley Forge, PA 19482-2600
Connect with Vanguard® > www.vanguard.com
Fund Information > 800-662-7447 | “FTSE®” is a trademark jointly owned by the London |
| Stock Exchange plc and The Financial Times Limited |
Direct Investor Account Services > 800-662-2739 | and is used by FTSE International Limited under license. |
| The FTSE High Dividend Yield Index is calculated by FTSE |
Institutional Investor Services > 800-523-1036 | International Limited. FTSE International Limited does not |
| sponsor, endorse, or promote the fund; is not in any way |
Text Telephone for People | connected to it; and does not accept any liability in |
| relation to its issue, operation, and trading. |
With Hearing Impairment > 800-952-3335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| All comparative mutual fund data are from Lipper Inc. |
This material may be used in conjunction | or Morningstar, Inc., unless otherwise noted. |
with the offering of shares of any Vanguard |
|
fund only if preceded or accompanied by |
|
the fund’s current prospectus. | You can obtain a free copy of Vanguard’s proxy voting |
| guidelines by visiting our website, www.vanguard.com, |
| and searching for “proxy voting guidelines,” or by |
| calling Vanguard at 800-662-2739. The guidelines are |
CFA® is a trademark owned by CFA Institute. | also available from the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. |
| In addition, you may obtain a free report on how your |
The funds or securities referred to herein are not | fund voted the proxies for securities it owned during |
sponsored, endorsed, or promoted by MSCI, and MSCI | the 12 months ended June 30. To get the report, visit |
bears no liability with respect to any such funds or | either www.vanguard.com or www.sec.gov. |
securities. For any such funds or securities, the |
|
prospectus or the Statement of Additional Information |
|
contains a more detailed description of the limited |
|
relationship MSCI has with The Vanguard Group and |
|
any related funds. |
|
|
|
| You can review and copy information about your fund |
| at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. |
| To find out more about this public service, call the SEC |
| at 202-551-8090. Information about your fund is also |
Russell is a trademark of The Frank Russell Company. | available on the SEC’s website, and you can receive |
| copies of this information, for a fee, by sending a |
| request in either of two ways: via e-mail addressed to |
| publicinfo@sec.gov or via regular mail addressed to the |
| Public Reference Section, Securities and Exchange |
| Commission, Washington, DC 20549-0102. |
|
|
|
|
| © 2009 The Vanguard Group, Inc. |
| All rights reserved. |
| Vanguard Marketing Corporation, Distributor. |
|
|
| Q652 052009 |
> Since our fiscal-year report to you, the global financial markets have provided little relief for investors.
> Vanguard Growth Equity Fund returned about –29%, a disappointing result that was several paces behind the return of its benchmark index and the average return of peer-group funds.
> Holdings in the information technology, energy, and industrial sectors accounted for half of the fund’s negative return.
Contents |
|
|
|
Your Fund’s Total Returns | 1 |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Advisors’ Report | 6 |
Fund Profile | 9 |
Performance Summary | 10 |
Financial Statements | 11 |
About Your Fund’s Expenses | 20 |
Trustees Approve Advisory Agreements | 22 |
Glossary | 24 |
Please note: The opinions expressed in this report are just that—informed opinions. They should not be considered promises or advice. Also, please keep in mind that the information and opinions cover the period through the date on the front of this report. Of course, the risks of investing in your fund are spelled out in the prospectus.
Your Fund’s Total Returns
Six Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
| Ticker | Total |
| Symbol | Returns |
Vanguard Growth Equity Fund | VGEQX | –29.38% |
Russell 1000 Growth Index |
| –25.97 |
Average Large-Cap Growth Fund1 |
| –26.00 |
Your Fund’s Performance at a Glance |
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008–March 31, 2009 |
|
| Distributions Per Share | |
| Starting | Ending | Income | Capital |
| Share Price | Share Price | Dividends | Gains |
Vanguard Growth Equity Fund | $9.46 | $6.62 | $0.062 | $0.000 |
1 Derived from data provided by Lipper Inc.
1
President’s Letter
Dear Shareholder,
The fiscal half-year opened with a steep drop in equity prices and closed on a strong up note. Despite the end-of-period surge, Vanguard Growth Equity Fund returned about –29% for the six months ended March 31. This was obviously a disappointing result, both on its own and compared with the fund’s benchmark index (the Russell 1000 Growth Index) and competitive group, each of which returned about –26%.
The fund’s most recent results represent a continuation of the extraordinary stock market volatility that has characterized much of the past 18 months.
Extreme distress dappled with glimmers of hope
The six months ended March 31 witnessed extreme distress in global stock markets, with both U.S. and international stocks returning about –31%. The embattled financial sector continued to struggle, prompting regulators in the United States and abroad to take ever-more-aggressive actions to help the big banks fortify their fragile balance sheets.
2
Even as the gloom intensified, a few signs of recovery appeared on the horizon. Toward the end of the period, the swift contraction in manufacturing activity seemed to lessen. And throughout the six months, news from the housing sector seemed to improve. From their lows in early March through the end of the period, global stock markets generated a double-digit return.
Credit-market turmoil provoked dramatic response
Developments in the fixed income market were, if anything, even more unusual. In the months after the September collapse of Lehman Brothers, a major presence in the bond market, the trading of corporate bonds came to a near standstill as investors stampeded into U.S. Treasury bonds—considered the safest, most liquid credits—driving prices higher and yields lower. The difference between the yields of Treasuries and corporate bonds surged to levels not seen since the 1930s.
The Federal Reserve Board responded to the credit market and economic crises with a dramatic easing of monetary policy, reducing its target for short-term interest rates to an all-time low of 0% to 0.25%. The Fed also created new programs designed to bring borrowers and lenders back to the market. For the six-month period, the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index returned 4.70% on the strength of Treasuries and other government-backed bonds. The broad municipal bond market returned 5.00%.
Market Barometer |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Returns |
|
| Periods Ended March 31, 2009 | |
| Six Months | One Year | Five Years1 |
Stocks |
|
|
|
Russell 1000 Index (Large-caps) | –30.59% | –38.27% | –4.54% |
Russell 2000 Index (Small-caps) | –37.17 | –37.50 | –5.24 |
Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Index (Entire market) | –30.72 | –37.69 | –4.24 |
MSCI All Country World Index ex USA (International) | –30.54 | –46.18 | –0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds |
|
|
|
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index |
|
|
|
(Broad taxable market) | 4.70% | 3.13% | 4.13% |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | 5.00 | 2.27 | 3.21 |
Citigroup 3-Month Treasury Bill Index | 0.30 | 1.13 | 3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPI |
|
|
|
Consumer Price Index | –2.78% | –0.38% | 2.57% |
1 Annualized.
3
Decline in sector returns was broad-based
No sector of the Growth Equity Fund avoided a double-digit decline during the fiscal half-year. Three sectors in particular—information technology, energy, and industrials—accounted for half of the fund’s return of about –29%, reflecting their sensitivity to the global economic slowdown. Companies in the energy sector faced the additional complication of an abrupt collapse of oil prices.
The fund’s return lagged that of its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Its information technology holdings, which accounted for about a fifth of the fund’s assets on average, did not fare as well as those in the index. Although the fund benefited from the advisors’ choices among computer equipment stocks, their choices among computer hardware stocks were disappointing.
The fund’s energy and consumer staples holdings also generally came up short compared with their counterparts in the index. The fund’s energy choices included Petroleo Brasileiro, the Brazilian-based global integrated oil and gas company, whose stock felt the effect of the drop in emerging-market stocks. Disappointing choices in the consumer staples sector included food retailers Kroger and Whole Foods.
Bright spots were few, but the fund’s advisors identified a handful of stocks that bucked the downturn, most notably
Expense Ratios1 |
|
|
Your Fund Compared With Its Peer Group |
|
|
|
| Average |
|
| Large-Cap |
| Fund | Core Fund |
Growth Equity Fund | 0.60% | 1.34% |
1 The fund expense ratio shown is from the prospectus dated March 17, 2009, and represents estimated costs for the current fiscal year based on the fund’s current net assets. For the six months ended March 31, 2009, the annualized expense ratio was 0.47%. The peer-group expense ratio is derived from data provided by Lipper Inc. and captures information through year-end 2008.
4
Apollo Group, an education services provider, and Archer Daniels Midland, the food processor and ethanol producer.
Extraordinary markets demand extraordinary discipline
Investors have good reasons for feeling a bit shell-shocked amid the sometimes dramatic daily ups and downs of the financial markets over the last several months. Most financial assets—not just stocks—suffered historic losses. Even more notable were the speed and breadth of the declines.
While investors cannot control the markets, they can control how they react to extraordinary events and how they position their portfolios. History has shown that it’s important to maintain an investment plan that is balanced and diversified within and across asset classes and is consistent with your time horizon, goals, and tolerance for risk.
We are confident that, in the face of extraordinary markets, such a straightforward, disciplined investment approach can pay off in the long term.
On a final note, I would like to welcome Jennison Associates LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Financial, Inc., as a co-manager of Vanguard Growth Equity Fund, along with Baillie Gifford Overseas Ltd. Jennison replaces Turner Investment Partners, which served the fund since its inception in 1992. We thank the Turner firm for its service to our shareholders.
As always, thank you for entrusting your assets to Vanguard.
Sincerely,
F. William McNabb III
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 20, 2009
5
Advisors’ Report
During the six months ended March 31, 2009, the Growth Equity Fund returned about –29%. Your fund is managed by two independent advisors. This provides exposure to distinct, yet complementary, investment approaches to a particular market segment, enhancing the fund’s diversification.
The advisors, their percentage of fund assets managed, and brief descriptions of their investment strategies are presented in the table below. The advisors have also prepared a discussion of the investment environment that existed during the fiscal period and of how their portfolio positioning reflects this assessment. These comments were prepared on April 13, 2009.
Jennison Associates LLC
Portfolio Manager:
Kathleen A. McCarragher,
Managing Director
We began managing our portfolio for the fund in January 2009. Our investment strategy is based on the philosophy that internal fundamental research and a highly interactive investment process lead to successful stock selection and portfolio construction. We believe that a stock’s value over time is driven by above-average growth in units, revenues, earnings, and cash flow. We seek to capture the acceleration of growth or the inflection point in a company’s growth rate that is not fully reflected in the stock’s price. And we value the duration of that growth.
Vanguard Growth Equity Fund Investment Advisors |
| ||
|
|
|
|
| Fund Assets Managed |
| |
Investment Advisor | % | $ Million | Investment Strategy |
Jennison Associates LLC | 48 | 220 | Employs a research-driven fundamental investment |
|
|
| approach that relies on in-depth company knowledge |
|
|
| gleaned through meetings with management, |
|
|
| customers, and suppliers. |
Baillie Gifford Overseas Ltd. | 45 | 211 | Uses a fundamental approach to identify quality |
|
|
| growth companies, and considers the sustainability |
|
|
| of earnings growth to be a critical factor in evaluating |
|
|
| a company’s prospects. Looks for companies with |
|
|
| attractive industry backgrounds, strong competitive |
|
|
| positions within those industries, high-quality earnings, |
|
|
| and a favorable attitude toward shareholders. |
Cash Investments | 7 | 33 | These short-term reserves are invested by Vanguard |
|
|
| in equity index products to simulate investment in |
|
|
| stocks. Each advisor also may maintain a modest |
|
|
| cash position. |
6
In the roughly three months since its inception, our portfolio benefited from generally good stock selection, especially in the financial and consumer discretionary sectors. Goldman Sachs was a notable contributor in financials. We consider Goldman “best in class” and expect it to benefit from its strong balance sheet and ability to navigate the current troubled market environment.
In consumer discretionary, Amazon.com reported strong earnings in the wake of its biggest holiday season ever, even as other retailers felt the brunt of the recession. The company’s results reflect the ongoing shift toward e-commerce and Amazon’s continued gains in market share, which have been fueled by highly targeted merchandising and the ability to control pricing and delivery times.
An overweight position hurt relative return in health care, but our stock selection helped, as generic drug manufacturer Mylan advanced on sound execution and the integration benefits of recent acquisitions. The global economic slowdown is expected to boost demand for generic medicines as consumers and governments look to cut costs.
In information technology, Apple rose as better-than-expected holiday sales were followed by indications of strong first-calendar-quarter sales of iPods and iPhones. We believe the company’s creativity and innovation in product design and marketing will continue to drive share gains, even in a tougher environment.
Another technology holding, Hewlett-Packard, came under pressure because of concerns that it would not be immune to the recession. We like HP’s diversified revenue streams and strong execution but acknowledge that the company faces near- and intermediate-term economic headwinds.
Research In Motion, which makes the BlackBerry, fell after its earnings guidance disappointed investors. We view Research In Motion as a long-term winner that will gain market share, and expect the smart-phone category to remain healthy even in a tough macroeconomic environment.
We remain focused on the profit and cash-flow prospects of our holdings. We believe the companies we own are well-capitalized and capable of generating earnings-per-share growth at a healthy premium above market averages.
Baillie Gifford Overseas Ltd.
Portfolio Manager:
Mick Brewis, Partner and Head of North
American Investment Team
The past few months have been characterized by a collapse in confidence in the outlook for both the U.S. and global
7
economies. There have been two big problems, each compounding the other. First, there has been a normal cyclical reaction to a period of tight monetary policy and a severe slowdown in the housing market. Second, there has been a credit crisis, as the U.S. financial system has proven to be too fragile, following a period of excessive lending, to weather a cyclical recession.
The U.S. authorities’ policy response to the financial crisis has been impressive, but it will take time for the full effect of these measures to have an impact on the economy. It remains to be seen whether the plans to remove the toxic (renamed “legacy”) assets from bank balance sheets will be successful. Much will depend on whether the banks will sell at prices buyers will pay. Many policy initiatives are untested, and the long-term repercussions are difficult to fathom. However, the most likely outcome is that fiscal and monetary stimulus on the current scale will work and, if it does not, more will be done until it does work.
Thus far, interest rates have declined dramatically and the price of oil has fallen sharply, and tax cuts will add to these stimulatory factors. This all helps to explain why consumer demand has remained surprisingly resilient.
Debt will remain a burden to companies, and the housing market still has not stabilized. Further problems are likely in the financial sector, and a great deal of restructuring will cast a shadow over the wider economy. Consequently, many companies are likely to produce bad news for most of this year.
Despite this uncertain background, our objective remains clear. We are long-term investors whose goals are to identify companies that will increase their earnings more strongly than the market and to not be distracted by the short-term behavior of financial markets. The extent and breadth of weakness across the market make it almost certain that some companies are being unfairly punished amid the recent turmoil. Strong balance sheets and low reliance on debt financing are likely to be among the defining characteristics of stronger companies.
8
Growth Equity Fund
Fund Profile
As of March 31, 2009
Portfolio Characteristics |
|
| |
|
| Comparative | Broad |
| Fund | Index1 | Index2 |
Number of Stocks | 76 | 636 | 4,489 |
Median Market Cap | $38.3B | $27.1B | $22.3B |
Price/Earnings Ratio | 15.1x | 13.1x | 15.0x |
Price/Book Ratio | 2.8x | 2.7x | 1.7x |
Yield3 | 0.4% | 2.1% | 2.7% |
Return on Equity | 23.4% | 23.6% | 20.2% |
Earnings Growth Rate | 20.0% | 21.6% | 15.0% |
Foreign Holdings | 7.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Turnover Rate4 | 117% | — | — |
Expense Ratio5 | 0.60% | — | — |
Short-Term Reserves | 4.4% | — | — |
Sector Diversification (% of equity exposure) | |||
|
| Comparative | Broad |
| Fund | Index1 | Index2 |
Consumer Discretionary | 6.7% | 10.2% | 9.4% |
Consumer Staples | 19.0 | 13.9 | 11.2 |
Energy | 10.0 | 7.9 | 12.3 |
Financials | 9.4 | 3.3 | 13.1 |
Health Care | 18.7 | 14.9 | 14.6 |
Industrials | 8.5 | 11.9 | 10.0 |
Information Technology | 22.5 | 31.1 | 17.7 |
Materials | 4.6 | 4.2 | 3.7 |
Telecommunication |
|
|
|
Services | 0.3 | 0.8 | 3.6 |
Utilities | 0.3 | 1.8 | 4.4 |
Volatility Measures6 |
| |
| Fund Versus | Fund Versus |
| Comparative Index1 | Broad Index2 |
R-Squared | 0.94 | 0.85 |
Beta | 1.08 | 1.03 |
Ten Largest Holdings7 (% of total net assets) | ||
|
|
|
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | hypermarkets |
|
| and super centers | 3.7% |
Schlumberger Ltd. | oil and gas |
|
| equipment and |
|
| services | 2.9 |
Cisco Systems, Inc. | communications |
|
| equipment | 2.8 |
PepsiCo, Inc. | soft drinks | 2.8 |
Oracle Corp. | systems software | 2.5 |
Progressive Corp. of Ohio | property and |
|
| casualty insurance | 2.5 |
Gilead Sciences, Inc. | biotechnology | 2.5 |
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. | property and |
|
Class B | casualty insurance | 2.4 |
Google Inc. | Internet software |
|
| and services | 2.3 |
Johnson & Johnson | pharmaceuticals | 2.3 |
Top Ten |
| 26.7% |
Investment Focus
1 Russell 1000 Growth Index.
2 Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Index.
3 30-day SEC yield for the fund; annualized dividend yield for the indexes. See the Glossary.
4 Annualized.
5 The fund expense ratio shown is from the prospectus dated March 17, 2009, and represents estimated costs for the current fiscal year based on the fund’s current net assets. For the six months ended March 31, 2009, the annualized expense ratio was 0.47%.
6 For an explanation of R-squared, beta, and other terms used here, see the Glossary.
7 The holdings listed exclude any temporary cash investments and equity index products.
9
Growth Equity Fund
Performance Summary
All of the returns in this report represent past performance, which is not a guarantee of future results that may be achieved by the fund. (Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data cited. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit our website at www.vanguard.com/performance.) Note, too, that both investment returns and principal value can fluctuate widely, so an investor’s shares, when sold, could be worth more or less than their original cost. The returns shown do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the sale of fund shares.
Fiscal-Year Total Returns (%): September 30, 1998–March 31, 2009
Average Annual Total Returns: Periods Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| Inception Date | One Year | Five Years | Ten Years |
Growth Equity Fund2 | 3/11/1992 | –41.80% | –6.46% | –5.74% |
1 Six months ended March 31, 2009.
2 Total returns do not include the account service fee that may be applicable to certain accounts with balances below $10,000.
Note: See Financial Highlights table for dividend and capital gains information.
10
Growth Equity Fund
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Statement of Net Assets
As of March 31, 2009
The fund provides a complete list of its holdings four times in each fiscal year, at the quarter-ends. For the second and fourth fiscal quarters, the lists appear in the fund’s semiannual and annual reports to shareholders. For the first and third fiscal quarters, the fund files the lists with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form N-Q. Shareholders can look up the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room (see the back cover of this report for further information).
|
|
| Market |
|
|
| Value• |
|
| Shares | ($000) |
Common Stocks (91.2%)1 |
|
| |
Consumer Discretionary (6.0%) |
|
| |
* | Amazon.com, Inc. | 111,009 | 8,153 |
| The Walt Disney Co. | 363,647 | 6,604 |
| Omnicom Group Inc. | 193,840 | 4,536 |
| NIKE, Inc. Class B | 76,328 | 3,579 |
| Home Depot, Inc. | 124,380 | 2,930 |
* | CarMax, Inc. | 168,400 | 2,095 |
|
|
| 27,897 |
Consumer Staples (17.8%) |
|
| |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | 333,455 | 17,373 |
| PepsiCo, Inc. | 248,994 | 12,818 |
| Walgreen Co. | 402,700 | 10,454 |
| The Kroger Co. | 367,620 | 7,801 |
| Costco Wholesale Corp. | 145,298 | 6,730 |
| Brown-Forman Corp. |
|
|
| Class B | 153,400 | 5,956 |
| Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 81,093 | 4,783 |
| The Coca-Cola Co. | 89,208 | 3,921 |
| The Procter & Gamble Co. | 80,660 | 3,798 |
| Alberto-Culver Co. | 153,940 | 3,481 |
* | Cadbury PLC ADR | 102,530 | 3,107 |
| Shoppers Drug Mart Corp. | 69,540 | 2,390 |
|
|
| 82,612 |
Energy (8.9%) |
|
| |
| Schlumberger Ltd. | 333,099 | 13,530 |
| Apache Corp. | 102,260 | 6,554 |
| EOG Resources, Inc. | 96,800 | 5,301 |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp. | 60,920 | 3,390 |
* | Southwestern Energy Co. | 103,950 | 3,086 |
| Diamond Offshore |
|
|
| Drilling, Inc. | 44,760 | 2,814 |
| Suncor Energy, Inc. | 111,430 | 2,487 |
| XTO Energy, Inc. | 79,911 | 2,447 |
* | Ultra Petroleum Corp. | 50,820 | 1,824 |
|
|
| 41,433 |
Financials (8.4%) |
|
| |
| Progressive Corp. of Ohio | 866,290 | 11,643 |
* | Berkshire Hathaway Inc. |
|
|
| Class B | 3,990 | 11,252 |
| Charles Schwab Corp. | 355,687 | 5,513 |
| The Goldman Sachs |
|
|
| Group, Inc. | 50,146 | 5,316 |
^ | M & T Bank Corp. | 67,680 | 3,062 |
* | Markel Corp. | 8,190 | 2,325 |
|
|
| 39,111 |
Health Care (17.3%) |
|
| |
* | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 248,502 | 11,511 |
| Johnson & Johnson | 201,890 | 10,619 |
| Teva Pharmaceutical |
|
|
| Industries Ltd. |
|
|
| Sponsored ADR | 181,685 | 8,185 |
| Baxter International, Inc. | 151,547 | 7,762 |
* | Medco Health |
|
|
| Solutions, Inc. | 176,704 | 7,305 |
| Merck & Co., Inc. | 253,400 | 6,778 |
| Abbott Laboratories | 128,024 | 6,107 |
* | Celgene Corp. | 128,863 | 5,722 |
| Alcon, Inc. | 53,344 | 4,850 |
| Roche Holding AG ADR | 135,548 | 4,659 |
* | Mylan Inc. | 343,062 | 4,600 |
| Shire PLC ADR | 34,683 | 1,247 |
* | Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 35,600 | 1,023 |
|
|
| 80,368 |
Industrials (7.7%) |
|
| |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. | 130,170 | 6,407 |
* | Stericycle, Inc. | 94,670 | 4,519 |
| SNC-Lavalin Group Inc. | 163,790 | 4,164 |
| Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 174,300 | 3,807 |
| Flowserve Corp. | 66,830 | 3,750 |
| Deere & Co. | 111,040 | 3,650 |
| United Technologies Corp. | 75,550 | 3,247 |
| Lockheed Martin Corp. | 36,991 | 2,553 |
11
Growth Equity Fund
|
|
| Market | |
|
|
| Value• | |
|
| Shares | ($000) | |
| Fastenal Co. | 53,900 | 1,733 | |
| Ritchie Bros. |
|
| |
| Auctioneers Inc. | 86,710 | 1,635 | |
|
|
| 35,465 | |
Information Technology (20.8%) |
|
| ||
* | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 784,721 | 13,160 | |
* | Oracle Corp. | 648,817 | 11,724 | |
* | Google Inc. | 30,750 | 10,703 | |
| QUALCOMM Inc. | 232,587 | 9,050 | |
* | Apple Inc. |
| 58,606 | 6,161 |
| Visa Inc. | 104,284 | 5,798 | |
* | Research In Motion Ltd. | 125,239 | 5,394 | |
| Hewlett-Packard Co. | 141,442 | 4,535 | |
| International Business |
|
| |
| Machines Corp. | 46,300 | 4,486 | |
| Intel Corp. | 297,100 | 4,471 | |
| Microsoft Corp. | 212,531 | 3,904 | |
* | Adobe Systems, Inc. | 177,977 | 3,807 | |
| Linear Technology Corp. | 162,110 | 3,725 | |
| MasterCard, Inc. Class A | 20,400 | 3,417 | |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 220,300 | 2,368 | |
* | eBay Inc. | 156,860 | 1,970 | |
* | Autodesk, Inc. | 105,320 | 1,770 | |
|
|
| 96,443 | |
Materials (4.3%) |
|
| ||
| Monsanto Co. | 118,473 | 9,845 | |
| Praxair, Inc. | 97,450 | 6,557 | |
| Potash Corp. of |
|
| |
| Saskatchewan, Inc. | 42,090 | 3,404 | |
|
|
| 19,806 | |
Total Common Stocks |
|
| ||
(Cost $538,670) |
| 423,135 | ||
Temporary Cash Investments (12.1%)1 |
|
| ||
Money Market Fund (10.6%) |
|
| ||
2,3 | Vanguard Market Liquidity |
|
| |
| Fund, 0.440% | 49,041,200 | 49,041 | |
| Face | Market |
| Amount | Value• |
| ($000) | ($000) |
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations (1.5%) |
| |
4,5 Federal Home Loan |
|
|
Mortgage Corp., |
|
|
1.206%, 4/30/09 | 5,000 | 5,000 |
4,5 Federal Home Loan |
|
|
Bank, 0.320%, |
|
|
5/18/09 | 2,000 | 2,000 |
|
| 7,000 |
Total Temporary Cash Investments |
|
|
(Cost $56,036) |
| 56,041 |
Total Investments (103.3%) |
|
|
(Cost $594,706) |
| 479,176 |
Other Assets and Liabilities (–3.3%) |
|
|
Other Assets |
| 2,109 |
Liabilities3 |
| (17,207) |
|
| (15,098) |
Net Assets (100%) |
|
|
Applicable to 70,063,128 outstanding |
|
|
$.001 par value shares of beneficial |
|
|
interest (unlimited authorization) |
| 464,078 |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $6.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2009, net assets consisted of: | ||
|
| Amount |
|
| ($000) |
Paid-in Capital |
| 1,281,672 |
Overdistributed Net Investment Income | (852) | |
Accumulated Net Realized Losses |
| (704,363) |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
| |
Investment Securities |
| (115,530) |
Futures Contracts |
| 3,151 |
Net Assets |
| 464,078 |
• See Note A in Notes to Financial Statements.
* Non-income-producing security.
^ Part of security position is on loan to broker-dealers. The total value of securities on loan is $2,366,000.
1 The fund invests a portion of its cash reserves in equity markets through the use of index futures contracts. After giving effect to futures investments, the fund’s effective common stock and temporary cash investment positions represent 98.3% and 5.0%, respectively, of net assets.
2 Affiliated money market fund available only to Vanguard funds and certain trusts and accounts managed by Vanguard. Rate shown is the 7-day yield.
3 Includes $2,458,000 of collateral received for securities on loan.
4 The issuer operates under a congressional charter; its securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
5 Securities with a value of $7,000,000 have been segregated as initial margin for open futures contracts.
ADR—American Depositary Receipt.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
12
Growth Equity Fund
Statement of Operations
| Six Months Ended |
| March 31, 2009 |
| ($000) |
Investment Income |
|
Income |
|
Dividends1 | 3,744 |
Interest2 | 254 |
Security Lending | 116 |
Total Income | 4,114 |
Expenses |
|
Investment Advisory Fees—Note B |
|
Basic Fee | 779 |
Performance Adjustment | (443) |
The Vanguard Group—Note C |
|
Management and Administrative | 709 |
Marketing and Distribution | 110 |
Custodian Fees | 19 |
Auditing Fees | 1 |
Shareholders’ Reports | 12 |
Trustees’ Fees and Expenses | 1 |
Total Expenses | 1,188 |
Expenses Paid Indirectly | (78) |
Net Expenses | 1,110 |
Net Investment Income | 3,004 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) |
|
Investment Securities Sold | (193,435) |
Futures Contracts | (18,366) |
Foreign Currencies | 153 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | (211,648) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|
Investment Securities | (8,566) |
Futures Contracts | 4,434 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | (4,132) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (212,776) |
1 Dividends are net of foreign withholding taxes of $36,000.
2 Interest income from an affiliated company of the fund was $215,000.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
13
Growth Equity Fund
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| March 31, |
| September 30, |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ($000) |
| ($000) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets |
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
Net Investment Income | 3,004 |
| 1,806 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | (211,648) |
| (10,899) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | (4,132) |
| (303,587) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (212,776) |
| (312,680) |
Distributions |
|
|
|
Net Investment Income | (4,464) |
| (1,264) |
Realized Capital Gain | — |
| — |
Total Distributions | (4,464) |
| (1,264) |
Capital Share Transactions |
|
|
|
Issued | 48,215 |
| 437,240 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 4,238 |
| 1,204 |
Redeemed | (102,514) |
| (367,899) |
Net Increase (Decrease) from Capital Share Transactions | (50,061) |
| 70,545 |
Total Increase (Decrease) | (267,301) |
| (243,399) |
Net Assets |
|
|
|
Beginning of Period | 731,379 |
| 974,778 |
End of Period1 | 464,078 |
| 731,379 |
1 Net Assets—End of Period includes undistributed (overdistributed) net investment income of ($852,000) and $455,000.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
14
Growth Equity Fund
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Six Months |
|
|
|
|
|
| Ended |
|
|
| ||
For a Share Outstanding | March 31, | Year Ended September 30, | ||||
Throughout Each Period | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $9.46 | $13.18 | $10.52 | $10.05 | $8.68 | $8.32 |
Investment Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income (Loss) | .042 | .015 | .020 | (.009) | .001 | .010 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
on Investments | (2.820) | (3.720) | 2.640 | .480 | 1.380 | .370 |
Total from Investment Operations | (2.778) | (3.705) | 2.660 | .471 | 1.381 | .380 |
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from Net Investment Income | (.062) | (.015) | — | (.001) | (.011) | (.020) |
Distributions from Realized Capital Gains | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Distributions | (.062) | (.015) | — | (.001) | (.011) | (.020) |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $6.62 | $9.46 | $13.18 | $10.52 | $10.05 | $8.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return1 | –29.38% | –28.15% | 25.29% | 4.69% | 15.92% | 4.56% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $464 | $731 | $975 | $759 | $713 | $765 |
Ratio of Total Expenses to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Net Assets2 | 0.47%3 | 0.72% | 0.68% | 0.91% | 0.88% | 0.72% |
Ratio of Net Investment Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) to Average Net Assets | 1.19%3 | 0.18% | 0.14% | (0.04%) | 0.01% | 0.14% |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 117%3 | 222% | 131% | 147% | 147% | 162% |
1 Total returns do not include the account service fee that may be applicable to certain accounts with balances below $10,000.
2 Includes performance-based investment advisory fee increases (decreases) of (0.18%), 0.08%, 0.04%, 0.19%, 0.11%, and (0.04%).
3 Annualized.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
15
Growth Equity Fund
Notes to Financial Statements
Vanguard Growth Equity Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end investment company, or mutual fund.
A. The following significant accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles for U.S. mutual funds. The fund consistently follows such policies in preparing its financial statements.
1. Security Valuation: Securities are valued as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m., Eastern time) on the valuation date. Equity securities are valued at the latest quoted sales prices or official closing prices taken from the primary market in which each security trades; such securities not traded on the valuation date are valued at the mean of the latest quoted bid and asked prices. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or whose values have been affected by events occurring before the fund’s pricing time but after the close of the securities’ primary markets, are valued at their fair values calculated according to procedures adopted by the board of trustees. These procedures include obtaining quotations from an independent pricing service, monitoring news to identify significant market- or security-specific events, and evaluating changes in the values of foreign market proxies (for example, ADRs, futures contracts, or exchange-traded funds), between the time the foreign markets close and the fund’s pricing time. When fair-value pricing is employed, the prices of securities used by a fund to calculate its net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same securities. Investments in Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund are valued at that fund’s net asset value. Temporary cash investments acquired over 60 days to maturity are valued using the latest bid prices or using valuations based on a matrix system (which considers such factors as security prices, yields, maturities, and ratings), both as furnished by independent pricing services. Other temporary cash investments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.
2. Foreign Currency: Securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates obtained from an independent third party as of the fund’s pricing time on the valuation date. Realized gains (losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investment securities include the effects of changes in exchange rates since the securities were purchased, combined with the effects of changes in security prices. Fluctuations in the value of other assets and liabilities resulting from changes in exchange rates are recorded as unrealized foreign currency gains (losses) until the assets or liabilities are settled in cash, at which time they are recorded as realized foreign currency gains (losses).
3. Futures Contracts: The fund uses index futures contracts to a limited extent, with the objective of maintaining full exposure to the stock market while maintaining liquidity. The fund may purchase or sell futures contracts to achieve a desired level of investment, whether to accommodate portfolio turnover or cash flows from capital share transactions. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are imperfect correlation between changes in market values of stocks held by the fund and the prices of futures contracts, and the possibility of an illiquid market.
Futures contracts are valued at their quoted daily settlement prices. The aggregate principal amounts of the contracts are not recorded in the Statement of Net Assets. Fluctuations in the value of the contracts are recorded in the Statement of Net Assets as an asset (liability) and in the Statement of Operations as unrealized appreciation (depreciation) until the contracts are closed, when they are recorded as realized futures gains (losses).
16
Growth Equity Fund
4. Federal Income Taxes: The fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income. Management has analyzed the fund’s tax positions taken on federal income tax returns for all open tax years (tax years ended September 30, 2005–2008) and for the period ended March 31, 2009, and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the fund’s financial statements.
5. Distributions: Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
6. Security Lending: The fund may lend its securities to qualified institutional borrowers to earn additional income. Security loans are required to be secured at all times by collateral at least equal to the market value of securities loaned. The fund invests cash collateral received in Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund, and records a liability for the return of the collateral, during the period the securities are on loan. Security lending income represents the income earned on investing cash collateral, less expenses associated with the loan.
7. Other: Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income includes income distributions received from Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund and is accrued daily. Security transactions are accounted for on the date securities are bought or sold. Costs used to determine realized gains (losses) on the sale of investment securities are those of the specific securities sold.
B. Baillie Gifford Overseas Ltd. and, beginning in January 2009, Jennison Associates LLC, each provide investment advisory services to a portion of the fund for fees calculated at an annual percentage rate of average net assets managed by the advisor. In accordance with the advisory contract entered into with Baillie Gifford Overseas Ltd. in April 2008, beginning April 1, 2009, the investment advisory fee will be subject to quarterly adjustments based on performance since June 30, 2008, relative to the S&P 500 Index. In accordance with the advisory contract entered into with Jennison Associates LLC in January 2009, beginning January 1, 2010, the investment advisory fee will be subject to quarterly adjustments based on performance since March 31, 2009, relative to the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Until January 2009, a portion of the fund was managed by Turner Investment Partners, LLC. The basic fee paid to Turner Investment Partners, LLC, was subject to quarterly adjustments based on performance for the preceding three years relative to the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
The Vanguard Group manages the cash reserves of the fund on an at-cost basis.
For the six months ended March 31, 2009, the aggregate investment advisory fee represented an effective annual basic rate of 0.31% of the fund’s average net assets, before a decrease of $443,000 (0.18%) based on performance.
C. The Vanguard Group furnishes at cost corporate management, administrative, marketing, and distribution services. The costs of such services are allocated to the fund under methods approved by the board of trustees. The fund has committed to provide up to 0.40% of its net assets in capital contributions to Vanguard. At March 31, 2009, the fund had contributed capital of $121,000 to Vanguard (included in Other Assets), representing 0.03% of the fund’s net assets and 0.05% of Vanguard’s capitalization. The fund’s trustees and officers are also directors and officers of Vanguard.
17
Growth Equity Fund
D. The fund has asked its investment advisors to direct certain security trades, subject to obtaining the best price and execution, to brokers who have agreed to rebate to the fund part of the commissions generated. Such rebates are used solely to reduce the fund’s management and administrative expenses. For the six months ended March 31, 2009, these arrangements reduced the fund’s expenses by $78,000 (an annual rate of 0.03% of average net assets).
E. Distributions are determined on a tax basis and may differ from net investment income and realized capital gains for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statements to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain, or loss are recognized in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes; these differences will reverse at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.
During the six months ended March 31, 2009, the fund realized net foreign currency gains of $153,000, which increased distributable net income for tax purposes; accordingly, such gains have been reclassified from accumulated net realized losses to overdistributed net investment income.
The fund’s tax-basis capital gains and losses are determined only at the end of each fiscal year. For tax purposes, at September 30, 2008, the fund had available realized losses of $493,466,000 to offset future net capital gains of $327,754,000 through September 30, 2010, $136,482,000 through September 30, 2011, and $29,230,000 through September 30, 2017. The fund will use these capital losses to offset net taxable capital gains, if any, realized during the year ending September 30, 2009; should the fund realize net capital losses for the year, the losses will be added to the loss carryforward balances above.
At March 31, 2009, the cost of investment securities for tax purposes was $594,706,000. Net unrealized depreciation of investment securities for tax purposes was $115,530,000, consisting of unrealized gains of $6,620,000 on securities that had risen in value since their purchase and $122,150,000 in unrealized losses on securities that had fallen in value since their purchase.
At March 31, 2009, the aggregate settlement value of open futures contracts expiring in June 2009 and the related unrealized appreciation (depreciation) were:
|
|
| ($000) |
| Number of | Aggregate | Unrealized |
| Long (Short) | Settlement | Appreciation |
Futures Contracts | Contracts | Value | (Depreciation) |
S&P 500 Index | 160 | 31,792 | 3,124 |
E-mini S&P 500 Index | 25 | 994 | 27 |
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on open futures contracts is required to be treated as realized gain (loss) for tax purposes.
F. During the six months ended March 31, 2009, the fund purchased $380,769,000 of investment securities and sold $452,033,000 of investment securities, other than temporary cash investments.
18
Growth Equity Fund
G. Capital shares issued and redeemed were:
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| March 31, 2009 |
| September 30, 2008 |
| Shares |
| Shares |
| (000) |
| (000) |
Issued | 6,914 |
| 34,487 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 629 |
| 88 |
Redeemed | (14,768) |
| (31,229) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | (7,225) |
| 3,346 |
H. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“FAS 157”), “Fair Value Measurements.” FAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements in financial statements.
The various inputs that may be used to determine the value of the fund’s investments are summarized in three broad levels. The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2—Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—Significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions used to determine the fair value of investments).
The following table summarizes the fund’s investments as of March 31, 2009, based on the inputs used to value them:
| Investments | Futures |
| in Securities | Contracts |
Valuation Inputs | ($000) | ($000) |
Level 1—Quoted prices | 472,176 | 3,151 |
Level 2—Other significant observable inputs | 7,000 | — |
Level 3—Significant unobservable inputs | — | — |
Total | 479,176 | 3,151 |
19
About Your Fund’s Expenses
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur ongoing costs, which include costs for portfolio management, administrative services, and shareholder reports (like this one), among others. Operating expenses, which are deducted from a fund’s gross income, directly reduce the investment return of the fund.
A fund’s expenses are expressed as a percentage of its average net assets. This figure is known as the expense ratio. The following examples are intended to help you understand the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with those of other mutual funds. The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period shown and held for the entire period.
The accompanying table illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:
• Based on actual fund return. This section helps you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from the fund’s actual return, and the third column shows the dollar amount that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.
To do so, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number given for your fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period.”
• Based on hypothetical 5% yearly return. This section is intended to help you compare your fund’s costs with those of other mutual funds. It assumes that the fund had a yearly return of 5% before expenses, but that the expense ratio is unchanged. In this case—because the return used is not the fund’s actual return—the results do not apply to your investment. The example is useful in making comparisons because the Securities and Exchange Commission requires all mutual funds to calculate expenses based on a 5% return. You can assess your fund’s costs by comparing this hypothetical example with the hypothetical examples that appear in shareholder reports of other funds.
Six Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses |
| Account Value | Account Value | Paid During |
Growth Equity Fund | 9/30/2008 | 3/31/2009 | Period1 |
Based on Actual Fund Return | $1,000.00 | $706.23 | $2.00 |
Based on Hypothetical 5% Yearly Return | 1,000.00 | 1,022.59 | 2.37 |
Note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare ongoing costs only and do not reflect transaction costs incurred by the fund for buying and selling securities. Further, the expenses do not include the account service fee described in the prospectus. If such a fee were applied to your account, your costs would be higher. Your fund does not charge transaction fees, such as purchase or redemption fees, nor does it carry a “sales load.”
1 The calculations are based on expenses incurred in the most recent six-month period. The fund’s annualized six-month expense ratio for that period is 0.47%. The dollar amounts shown as “Expenses Paid” are equal to the annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by the number of days in the most recent 12-month period.
20
The calculations assume no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.
You can find more information about the fund’s expenses, including annual expense ratios, in the Financial Statements section of this report. For additional information on operating expenses and other shareholder costs, please refer to your fund’s current prospectus.
21
Trustees Approve Advisory Agreements
The board of trustees of Vanguard Growth Equity Fund has renewed the fund’s investment advisory agreement with Baillie Gifford Overseas Ltd. The board also added Jennison Associates LLC to the fund’s investment advisory team effective January 2009. The board concluded that retaining Baillie Gifford and adding Jennison Associates to the investment advisory team were in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
The board based its decisions upon an evaluation of each advisor’s investment staff, portfolio management process, and performance. The trustees considered the factors discussed below, among others. However, no single factor determined whether the board approved the agreements. Rather, it was the totality of the circumstances that drove the board’s decision.
Nature, extent, and quality of services
The board considered the quality of the fund’s investment management over both the short and long term and took into account the organizational depth and stability of the firms. The board noted the following:
Baillie Gifford Overseas. Baillie Gifford is wholly owned by Baillie Gifford & Co., which was founded in 1908 and is among the largest independently owned investment management firms in the United Kingdom. The advisor employs a sound process to build a diversified portfolio of high-quality growth stocks. Stocks are selected using fundamental research conducted by Baillie Gifford’s Edinburgh-based analysts. Baillie Gifford has advised Vanguard Growth Equity Fund since 2008.
Jennison Associates. Jennison Associates uses a bottom-up investment approach supported by a deep and capable research effort. Jennison Associates has a stable and experienced team whose approach complements that of the fund’s other advisor, Baillie Gifford. The board reviewed the performance of other funds and portfolios managed by Jennison Associates and noted that Jennison Associates has a long track record of strong performance.
The board concluded that each advisor’s experience, stability, depth, and performance, among other factors, warranted approval of the advisory agreements.
Investment performance
The board considered the performance of the fund and noted that performance results have allowed the fund to remain competitive versus its benchmark and peer group. The board concluded that Baillie Gifford has carried out the fund’s investment strategy in disciplined fashion, and that results have been in line with expectations. Further, the board concluded that Jennison Associates’ other investment portfolios have been competitive versus relevant benchmarks and peer groups over various short- and long-term periods. Information about the fund’s most recent performance can be found in the Performance Summary section of this report.
Cost
The board considered the cost of services to be provided by Jennison Associates, including competitive fee rates, and concluded that, after the implementation of the agreement with Jennison Associates, the fund’s advisory fee rate and expense ratio would remain below the advisory fee rate and expense ratio charged by funds in its peer group. Information about the fund’s expense ratio appears in the About Your Fund’s Expenses section of this report as well as in the Financial Statements section, which also includes information about the advisory fee rate.
The board did not consider profitability of Baillie Gifford and Jennison Associates in determining whether to approve the advisory fees, because the firms are independent of Vanguard and the advisory fees are the result of arm’s-length negotiations.
22
The benefit of economies of scale
The board concluded that the fund’s shareholders benefit from economies of scale because of breakpoints in the fund’s advisory fee schedules. The breakpoints reduce the effective rate of the fees as the fund’s assets increase.
The board will consider whether to renew the advisory agreements after a one-year period.
23
Glossary
Beta. A measure of the magnitude of a fund’s past share-price fluctuations in relation to the ups and downs of a given market index. The index is assigned a beta of 1.00. Compared with a given index, a fund with a beta of 1.20 typically would have seen its share price rise or fall by 12% when the index rose or fell by 10%. For this report, beta is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index. Note that a fund’s beta should be reviewed in conjunction with its R-squared (see definition). The lower the R-squared, the less correlation there is between the fund and the index, and the less reliable beta is as an indicator of volatility.
Earnings Growth Rate. The average annual rate of growth in earnings over the past five years for the stocks now in a fund.
Equity Exposure. A measure that reflects a fund’s investments in stocks and stock futures. Any holdings in short-term reserves are excluded.
Expense Ratio. The percentage of a fund’s average net assets used to pay its annual administrative and advisory expenses. These expenses directly reduce returns to investors.
Foreign Holdings. The percentage of a fund represented by stocks or depositary receipts of companies based outside the United States.
Inception Date. The date on which the assets of a fund (or one of its share classes) are first invested in accordance with the fund’s investment objective. For funds with a subscription period, the inception date is the day after that period ends. Investment performance is measured from the inception date.
Median Market Cap. An indicator of the size of companies in which a fund invests; the midpoint of market capitalization (market price x shares outstanding) of a fund’s stocks, weighted by the proportion of the fund’s assets invested in each stock. Stocks representing half of the fund’s assets have market capitalizations above the median, and the rest are below it.
Price/Book Ratio. The share price of a stock divided by its net worth, or book value, per share. For a fund, the weighted average price/book ratio of the stocks it holds.
Price/Earnings Ratio. The ratio of a stock’s current price to its per-share earnings over the past year. For a fund, the weighted average P/E of the stocks it holds. P/E is an indicator of market expectations about corporate prospects; the higher the P/E, the greater the expectations for a company’s future growth.
R-Squared. A measure of how much of a fund’s past returns can be explained by the returns from the market in general, as measured by a given index. If a fund’s total returns were precisely synchronized with an index’s returns, its R-squared would be 1.00. If the fund’s returns bore no relationship to the index’s returns, its R-squared would be 0. For this report, R-squared is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index.
24
Return on Equity. The annual average rate of return generated by a company during the past five years for each dollar of shareholder’s equity (net income divided by shareholder’s equity). For a fund, the weighted average return on equity for the companies whose stocks it holds.
Short-Term Reserves. The percentage of a fund invested in highly liquid, short-term securities that can be readily converted to cash.
Turnover Rate. An indication of the fund’s trading activity. Funds with high turnover rates incur higher transaction costs and may be more likely to distribute capital gains (which may be taxable to investors). The turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions, which have minimal impact on costs.
Yield. A fund’s 30-day SEC yield is derived using a formula specified by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the formula, data related to the fund’s security holdings in the previous 30 days are used to calculate the fund’s hypothetical net income for that period, which is then annualized and divided by the fund’s estimated average net assets over the calculation period. For the purposes of this calculation, a security’s income is based on its current market yield to maturity (in the case of bonds) or its projected dividend yield (for stocks). Because the SEC yield represents hypothetical annualized income, it will differ—at times significantly—from the fund’s actual experience. As a result, the fund’s income distributions may be higher or lower than implied by the SEC yield.
25
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank.
The People Who Govern Your Fund
The trustees of your mutual fund are there to see that the fund is operated and managed in your best interests since, as a shareholder, you are a part owner of the fund. Your fund’s trustees also serve on the board of directors of The Vanguard Group, Inc., which is owned by the Vanguard funds and provides services to them on an at-cost basis.
A majority of Vanguard’s board members are independent, meaning that they have no affiliation with Vanguard or the funds they oversee, apart from the sizable personal investments they have made as private individuals. The independent board members have distinguished backgrounds in business, academia, and public service. Each of the trustees and executive officers oversees 157 Vanguard funds.
The following table provides information for each trustee and executive officer of the fund. More information about the trustees is in the Statement of Additional Information, which can be obtained, without charge, by contacting Vanguard at 800-662-7447, or online at www.vanguard.com.
Chairman of the Board and Interested Trustee
John J. Brennan1
Born 1954. Trustee Since May 1987. Chairman of the Board. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Chairman of the Board and Director/Trustee of The Vanguard Group, Inc., and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group; Chief Executive Officer and President of The Vanguard Group and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (1996–2008).
Independent Trustees
Charles D. Ellis
Born 1937. Trustee Since January 2001. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Applecore Partners (pro bono ventures in education); Senior Advisor to Greenwich Associates (international business strategy consulting); Successor Trustee of Yale University; Overseer of the Stern School of Business at New York University; Trustee of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research.
Emerson U. Fullwood
Born 1948. Trustee Since January 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Retired Executive Chief Staff and Marketing Officer for North America and Corporate Vice President of Xerox Corporation (photocopiers and printers); Director of SPX Corporation (multi-industry manufacturing), the United Way of Rochester, the Boy Scouts of America, Amerigroup Corporation (direct health and medical insurance carriers), and Monroe Community College Foundation.
Rajiv L. Gupta
Born 1945. Trustee Since December 2001.2 Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rohm and Haas Co. (chemicals); President of Rohm and Haas Co. (2006–2008); Board Member of American Chemistry Council; Director of Tyco International, Ltd. (diversified manufacturing and services) and Hewlett-Packard Co. (electronic computer manufacturing); Trustee of The Conference Board.
Amy Gutmann
Born 1949. Trustee Since June 2006. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: President of the University of Pennsylvania; Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science in the School of Arts and Sciences with Secondary Appointments at the Annenberg School for Communication and the Graduate School of Education of the University of Pennsylvania; Director of Carnegie Corporation of New York, Schuylkill River Development Corporation, and Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce; Trustee of the National Constitution Center.
JoAnn Heffernan Heisen
Born 1950. Trustee Since July 1998. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Retired Corporate Vice President, Chief Global Diversity Officer, and Member of the Executive Committee of Johnson & Johnson (pharmaceuticals/consumer products); Vice President and Chief Information Officer (1997–2005) of Johnson & Johnson; Director of the University Medical Center at Princeton and Women’s Research and Education Institute.
André F. Perold
Born 1952. Trustee Since December 2004. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: George Gund Professor of Finance and Banking, Senior Associate Dean, and Director of Faculty Recruiting, Harvard Business School; Director and Chairman of UNX, Inc. (equities trading firm); Chair of the Investment Committee of HighVista Strategies LLC (private investment firm).
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr.
Born 1941. Trustee Since January 1993. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of NACCO Industries, Inc. (forklift trucks/housewares/ lignite); Director of Goodrich Corporation (industrial products/aircraft systems and services).
J. Lawrence Wilson
Born 1936. Trustee Since April 1985. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rohm and Haas Co. (chemicals); Director of Cummins Inc. (diesel engines) and AmerisourceBergen Corp. (pharmaceutical distribution); Trustee of Vanderbilt University and of Culver Educational Foundation.
Executive Officers
Thomas J. Higgins1
Born 1957. Chief Financial Officer Since September 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Principal of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Chief Financial Officer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2008; Treasurer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (1998–2008).
Kathryn J. Hyatt1
Born 1955. Treasurer Since November 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Principal of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Treasurer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2008; Assistant Treasurer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (1988–2008).
F. William McNabb III1
Born 1957. Chief Executive Officer Since August 2008. President Since March 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Director of The Vanguard Group, Inc., since 2008; Chief Executive Officer and President of The Vanguard Group and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2008; Director of Vanguard Marketing Corporation; Managing Director of The Vanguard Group (1995–2008).
Heidi Stam1
Born 1956. Secretary Since July 2005. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Managing Director of The Vanguard Group, Inc., since 2006; General Counsel of The Vanguard Group since 2005; Secretary of The Vanguard Group and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2005; Director and Senior Vice President of Vanguard Marketing Corporation since 2005; Principal of The Vanguard Group (1997–2006).
Vanguard Senior Management Team | |
|
|
|
|
R. Gregory Barton | Michael S. Miller |
Mortimer J. Buckley | James M. Norris |
Kathleen C. Gubanich | Glenn W. Reed |
Paul A. Heller | George U. Sauter |
Founder
John C. Bogle
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, 1974–1996
1 These individuals are “interested persons” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
2 December 2002 for Vanguard Equity Income Fund, Vanguard Growth Equity Fund, the Vanguard Municipal Bond Funds, and the Vanguard State Tax-Exempt Funds.
P.O. Box 2600
Valley Forge, PA 19482-2600
Connect with Vanguard® > www.vanguard.com
Fund Information > 800-662-7447 | All comparative mutual fund data are from Lipper Inc. |
| or Morningstar, Inc., unless otherwise noted. |
Direct Investor Account Services > 800-662-2739 |
|
| You can obtain a free copy of Vanguard’s proxy voting |
Institutional Investor Services > 800-523-1036 | guidelines by visiting our website, www.vanguard.com, |
| and searching for “proxy voting guidelines,” or by |
Text Telephone for People | calling Vanguard at 800-662-2739. The guidelines are |
With Hearing Impairment > 800-952-3335 | also available from the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. |
| In addition, you may obtain a free report on how your |
| fund voted the proxies for securities it owned during |
| the 12 months ended June 30. To get the report, visit |
This material may be used in conjunction | either www.vanguard.com or www.sec.gov. |
with the offering of shares of any Vanguard |
|
fund only if preceded or accompanied by |
|
the fund’s current prospectus. |
|
|
|
| You can review and copy information about your fund |
| at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. |
| To find out more about this public service, call the SEC |
The funds or securities referred to herein are not | at 202-551-8090. Information about your fund is also |
sponsored, endorsed, or promoted by MSCI, and MSCI | available on the SEC’s website, and you can receive |
bears no liability with respect to any such funds or | copies of this information, for a fee, by sending a |
securities. For any such funds or securities, the | request in either of two ways: via e-mail addressed to |
prospectus or the Statement of Additional Information | publicinfo@sec.gov or via regular mail addressed to the |
contains a more detailed description of the limited | Public Reference Section, Securities and Exchange |
relationship MSCI has with The Vanguard Group and | Commission, Washington, DC 20549-0102. |
any related funds. |
|
|
|
Russell is a trademark of The Frank Russell Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| © 2009 The Vanguard Group, Inc. |
| All rights reserved. |
| Vanguard Marketing Corporation, Distributor. |
|
|
| Q5442 052009 |
> During the six months ended March 31, stocks continued to face stiff headwinds from credit-market turmoil and the global economic slowdown.
> Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund returned –23.60%, a disappointing absolute result but more than 6 percentage points ahead of the returns of the fund’s comparative standards.
> A light commitment to beleaguered financials and a heavy weighting in information technology, bolstered by good stock selection in both sectors, helped the fund to fare better than its benchmark index.
Contents |
|
|
|
Your Fund’s Total Returns | 1 |
President’s Letter | 2 |
Advisor’s Report | 6 |
Fund Profile | 10 |
Performance Summary | 11 |
Financial Statements | 12 |
About Your Fund’s Expenses | 21 |
Trustees Approve Advisory Agreement | 23 |
Glossary | 24 |
Please note: The opinions expressed in this report are just that—informed opinions. They should not be considered promises or advice. Also, please keep in mind that the information and opinions cover the period through the date on the front of this report. Of course, the risks of investing in your fund are spelled out in the prospectus.
Your Fund’s Total Returns
Six Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
| Ticker | Total |
| Symbol | Returns |
Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund | VPCCX | –23.60% |
MSCI US Prime Market 750 Index |
| –30.25 |
Average Multi-Cap Core Fund1 |
| –29.79 |
Your Fund’s Performance at a Glance |
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008–March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Distributions Per Share | |
| Starting | Ending | Income | Capital |
| Share Price | Share Price | Dividends | Gains |
Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund | $11.41 | $8.60 | $0.117 | $0.000 |
1 Derived from data provided by Lipper Inc.
1
President’s Letter
Dear Shareholder,
For the six months ended March 31, Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund returned a disappointing –23.60%. Still, the fund’s limited exposure to financials and heavy commitment to information technology, coupled with good stock selection in both sectors, kept it several steps ahead of the performance of comparative standards.
The start of the fund’s new fiscal year brought no relief for battered equities or investors. October was the worst month in the six-month span for the fund and its benchmark index as investors reacted to the deepening credit-market crisis and the slumping economy. In addition to steep losses, the stock market experienced levels of volatility not seen since the 1930s. For example, October encompassed not only two of the worst but also two of the best U.S. trading days since 1928 (based on percentage losses and gains).
Extreme distress dappled with glimmers of hope
The six months ended March 31 witnessed extreme distress in global stock markets, with both U.S. and international stocks returning about –31%. The embattled financial sector continued to struggle, prompting regulators in the United States and abroad to take ever-more-aggressive actions to help the big banks fortify their fragile balance sheets.
2
Even as the gloom intensified, a few signs of recovery appeared on the horizon. Toward the end of the period, the swift contraction in manufacturing activity seemed to lessen. And throughout the six months, news from the housing sector seemed to improve. From their early March lows through the end of the period, global stock markets generated a double-digit return.
Credit-market turmoil provoked dramatic response
Developments in the fixed income market were, if anything, even more unusual. In the months after the September collapse of Lehman Brothers, a major presence in the bond market, the trading of corporate bonds came to a near standstill as investors stampeded into U.S. Treasury bonds—considered the safest, most liquid credits—driving prices higher and yields lower. The difference between the yields of Treasuries and corporate bonds grew wider than it had been since the 1930s.
The Federal Reserve Board responded to the credit-market and economic crises with a dramatic easing of monetary policy, reducing its target for short-term interest rates to an all-time low of 0% to 0.25%. The Fed also created new programs designed to bring borrowers and lenders back to the market. For the six-month period, the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index returned 4.70% on the strength of Treasuries and other government-backed bonds. The broad municipal bond market returned 5.00%.
Market Barometer |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total Returns |
|
| Periods Ended March 31, 2009 | |
| Six Months | One Year | Five Years1 |
Stocks |
|
|
|
Russell 1000 Index (Large-caps) | –30.59% | –38.27% | –4.54% |
Russell 2000 Index (Small-caps) | –37.17 | –37.50 | –5.24 |
Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Index (Entire market) | –30.72 | –37.69 | –4.24 |
MSCI All Country World Index ex USA (International) | –30.54 | –46.18 | –0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds |
|
|
|
Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index |
|
|
|
(Broad taxable market) | 4.70% | 3.13% | 4.13% |
Barclays Capital Municipal Bond Index | 5.00 | 2.27 | 3.21 |
Citigroup 3-Month Treasury Bill Index | 0.30 | 1.13 | 3.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPI |
|
|
|
Consumer Price Index | –2.78 | –0.38 | 2.57 |
1 Annualized.
3
Sector positioning helped the fund battle stiff headwinds
Since the fund’s inception almost five years ago, PRIMECAP Management Company (the fund’s advisor) has established significant positions in health care and information technology, seeking to capitalize on the expected growth in health care spending by aging baby boomers and on the expanding global use of computer chips and other electronics. Recently, health care and tech stocks together have represented about half the fund’s total assets, and have dominated its top ten holdings.
This positioning benefited the fund in the six months ended March 31. Although all sectors in the fund and the benchmark MSCI US Prime Market 750 Index posted double-digit losses, the fund’s investments in information technology and health care stocks held up relatively well.
The tech sector has been hampered by the ongoing woes of some of its major financial-institution customers. Nevertheless, this sector in the fund had two pockets of relative strength, semiconductors and software, which represented more than half of the fund’s tech assets, on average, in the period. One of the fund’s larger positions, ASML Holding—a Netherlands-based supplier of lithography systems used in microchip manufacturing—posted a modest six-month gain. In software, two of the fund’s top-ten holdings—Oracle and Intuit—notched gains in the first quarter of 2009, which helped to moderate their losses for the half-year.
Expense Ratios1 |
|
|
Your Fund Compared With Its Peer Group |
|
|
|
| Average |
|
| Multi-Cap |
| Fund | Core Fund |
PRIMECAP Core Fund | 0.55% | 1.18% |
1 The fund expense ratio shown is from the prospectus dated January 15, 2009, and represents estimated costs for the current fiscal year based on the fund’s current net assets. For the six months ended March 31, 2009, the fund’s annualized expense ratio was 0.54%. The peer-group expense ratio is derived from data provided by Lipper Inc. and captures information through year-end 2008.
4
The health care sector overall can be somewhat recession-resistant. This appeared to be the case in the fund and the benchmark index, especially among some biotechnology companies. Amgen, one of the fund’s top-ten holdings, held up relatively well. In addition, Genentech benefited from completion of a takeover by Roche. On the other hand, some large pharmaceutical companies, including top-ten holdings Eli Lilly, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline, came under pressure from the prospect of health care reform and a move toward generic drugs.
The flip side of the fund’s heavy commitment to health care and technology stocks has been its relatively light investment in financial, consumer staples, and energy stocks. The advisor’s underweighting in financials—and a preference for insurance companies rather than banks and brokerage firms—helped shield the fund from the worst of the sector’s troubles. The fund’s financial stocks returned –35%, compared with –53% for the sector’s return in the index. For more on the advisor’s strategy and outlook, please see the Advisor’s Report following this letter.
Extraordinary markets demand extraordinary discipline
Investors have good reasons to feel a bit shell-shocked by the sometimes-dramatic daily ups and downs of the stock market over the last several months. Most financial assets—not just stocks—suffered historic losses. Even more notable was the speed and breadth of the declines.
While investors can’t control the investment environment, they can control their reactions to these extraordinary events. History has shown us that it’s important to maintain a disciplined investment plan that is balanced and diversified within and across asset classes, consistent with your time horizon, goals, and tolerance for risk.
Discipline, patience, and a long-term view are hallmarks of Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund, which itself is diversified among growth- and value-oriented stocks from a range of market capitalizations. These characteristics can help the fund weather the market’s inevitable setbacks and help investors capture the potential long-term rewards of investing in underappreciated stocks.
Thank you for entrusting your assets to Vanguard.
Sincerely,
F. William McNabb III
President and Chief Executive Officer April 20, 2009
5
Advisor’s Report
For the six months ended March 31, Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund returned –23.60%. Although the fund’s return was more than 6 percentage points ahead of the return of the MSCI US Prime Market 750 Index and the average return of multicap core funds, it was disappointing on an absolute basis. The primary contributors to the fund’s relative performance were our longstanding avoidance of financials, our above-benchmark position in information technology, and favorable stock selection in both of these sectors.
Investment environment
The early signs of a slowdown in the U.S. economy that first appeared in late 2007 evolved into what has become the longest-running recession of the post-World War II era. At the same time, the global financial crisis that began in 2007 worsened throughout 2008, leading to the failure of several major global institutions.
In our annual report to you last October, we noted that financial-market turmoil was our most immediate concern. Indeed, this turmoil intensified in the final three months of 2008. While some areas of the financial markets, such as interbank lending, have recently shown signs of stabilization, it is, in our opinion, still too early to determine whether the unprecedented U.S. and foreign government programs to address the credit crunch and bolster the financial system will prove effective.
A year ago, even as the economic picture was dimming, stock market fundamentals remained healthy and corporate America appeared to be on solid ground. By the second half of 2008, this situation had changed dramatically. The unwinding of years of underpriced risk and excessive leverage took its toll, spreading well beyond the financial sector to the broader economy, including Main Street. Liquidity vanished, consumer spending declined, and businesses reduced output.
In short, we view this period—and the unprecedented government intervention it engendered—as transformational. Not since the Depression have we experienced such a broad and steep simultaneous decline in value across virtually all asset classes. The true extent of the transformation is likely to become clearer only as the nature and degree of U.S. government involvement in the financial sector—and now in the auto industry—evolve.
Management of the fund
Despite the economic and credit-market upheavals, our primary objective remains the same. We seek to identify companies whose long-term fundamentals will evolve significantly better than current valuation suggests. To find these companies, we rely on rigorous fundamental research and meet not only with company management but also with competitors, suppliers, and customers. We invest with a long-term perspective and expect that over a three- to five-year horizon, our choices will outperform the market.
This process has led us to make significant investments in health care and information technology since the fund was launched almost five years ago. We anticipate superior growth for these sectors, in
6
part based on our expectation of growing demand for health care products and services and increasing global use of computers and electronics. For the half-year, the fund’s 28% average weighting in health care was almost double that of the MSCI US Prime Market 750 Index, and the fund’s 25% average weighting in technology was also considerably larger than its index weighting.
For the six months ended March 31, information technology (–20%) and health care (–22%) were the fund’s best-performing sectors. Within information technology, more than half of our investment was in software and semiconductor businesses. Two of the fund’s top-ten holdings—software providers Intuit and Oracle—posted positive returns in the first calendar quarter of 2009 that helped temper their six-month losses.
Semiconductor chip-makers and related companies often tend to lead in a cyclical economic recovery. Our above-benchmark weighting and favorable stock selection among these companies helped the fund’s overall return. The fund’s larger semiconductor holdings include Netherlands-based ASML Holding (+1%), which makes lithography systems used in the manufacture of integrated circuits, and Intel (–18%).
We believe changes in the technology industry over the last ten years—including greater market concentration and a more global customer base—have improved fundamentals, and we maintain our conviction in the companies whose stock we hold.
The overall performance of the health care sector in part reflects its typically more recession-resistant nature and the relative resilience of biotechnology firms—including Amgen (–16%), one of the fund’s largest holdings, and Biogen Idec (+4%). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is reviewing a biologics license application for denosumab, Amgen’s new treatment for osteoporosis and certain forms of cancer. A decision is expected in the fourth quarter of 2009. Biogen Idec reported an increase in sales and earnings and was among the leading positive contributors to the fund’s total return. Genentech (+7%) also rose as Roche completed its purchase of the company.
Among our weaker health care performers in the six months were Eli Lilly (–22%), the fund’s largest holding, and Novartis (–26%), also a top-ten holding. In February, an FDA advisory committee unanimously approved the use of Eli Lilly’s prasugrel, a blood thinner, for treatment of certain coronary patients. The FDA is not bound by the committee’s recommendation and has not yet responded to the filing for prasugrel, considered to be one of the most important drugs in Eli Lilly’s pipeline. In January, Novartis reported higher sales and earnings for 2008 and increased its dividend. Still, questions about the impact of health care reform weighed on both companies.
7
Medtronic (–41%), a developer of medical technology and devices, detracted from overall returns. The company faced challenges following the recall of its implanted heart defibrillator cable product in late 2007. Although the company has addressed the issue and recently has cut costs and improved overall production efficiency, sales have not yet recovered.
We remain convinced of the long-term growth potential of our health care stocks. Large pharmaceutical companies in particular face uncertainty from the prospect of health care reform, increased scrutiny during the FDA approval process, Medicare reimbursement reviews, and generic competition. However, pharmaceuticals are well capitalized with, in our view, underappreciated drug and treatment pipelines. Also, they expense research and development expenditures as they are incurred, so their earnings are understated relative to businesses that amortize investments for future growth. We believe pharmaceutical companies have the potential to generate above-market long-term growth rates.
The counterbalance to our heavy commitment to health care and information technology has been our light investment in financial, energy, and consumer staples stocks. This positioning produced mixed results in the fiscal half-year.
The fund benefited from largely avoiding investments in the financial sector, which lost more than half of its value in the benchmark index. Since the fund’s inception, we’ve eschewed a heavy investment in financial stocks, believing that the sector’s opaque balance sheets made these businesses difficult to value. In addition, we’ve viewed much of the growth in profits at financial institutions as resulting from increasingly higher leverage and thus unlikely to be sustainable.
Our relatively small financial holdings (about 5% of the fund’s average assets during the period) are focused on insurance brokers such as Marsh & McLennan and property and casualty insurers. We believe these companies continue to exhibit strong fundamentals.
Our stock selection in the energy sector and our underweighted position in the consumer staples sector detracted from the fund’s return for the period. When oil prices reversed course last summer, prices of several oil, gas, and coal-related holdings, including Schlumberger (–47%), EOG Resources (–39%), and Arch Coal (–59%) declined markedly.
Outlook
As we enter the second half of the fund’s fiscal year, there is still a long list of reasons to be cautious about the markets—in spite of the March rally. Many economists fear the current U.S. recession will be the most severe in magnitude since the Great Depression. While the dramatic declines in energy and commodity prices might help consumers, most other factors point to a protracted weak economic environment through 2009. Corporate profits have been generally shrinking, job losses have been increasing, and the housing market has remained depressed. Access to credit for both consumers and businesses remains
8
difficult as banks, hedge funds, and other financial institutions continue to reduce leverage and preserve capital.
Despite the U.S. Treasury’s injections of capital into numerous financial institutions, we remain concerned that the majority of them will continue to face mounting losses on loans and securities that will be further magnified by the leverage on their balance sheets. As we write this report, it is unclear whether the government actions to restore credit flows and shore up the financial system will prove effective in the long run. There are legitimate concerns about the increased moral hazard and unintended consequences that are likely to result from the various rescue plans and stimulus bills. Increased regulation and government involvement in private enterprise may result in slower long-term growth and lower market valuations. We are also concerned that the dramatic increase in money supply may result in inflation.
In these uncertain times, we see many attractive investment opportunities. Companies with innovative products, strong competitive advantages, growing markets, and strong balance sheets are trading, in our assessment, at compelling valuations. Over the past six months, the stocks of many high-quality companies have declined more, in our opinion, because of indiscriminate selling pressure than deterioration in their earnings or growth prospects. We feel confident that at some point over the next few years, we will look back at this period as a rare opportunity to buy great companies at extremely low valuations.
We believe that fundamental investing will be rewarded in 2009 and beyond. The general sentiment in the market has been negative—at least until recently—because of concerns about declining gross domestic product (GDP), rising unemployment, shrinking corporate profits, and an over-extended U.S. consumer. While we do not anticipate much growth in U.S. GDP in 2009, we think our current holdings are well positioned to weather a minimal-growth environment. During turbulent economic times, fundamentals matter most. In our judgment, the companies in which we have invested are generally well managed, possess healthy balance sheets, are well situated in their respective industries, and have greater growth prospects than current valuations reflect.
Joel P. Fried |
| Howard B. Schow |
Portfolio Manager |
| Portfolio Manager |
| Theo A. Kolokotrones |
|
| Portfolio Manager |
|
Mitchell J. Milias |
| Alfred W. Mordecai |
Portfolio Manager |
| Portfolio Manager |
| David H. Van Slooten |
|
| Portfolio Manager |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRIMECAP Management Company | April 14, 2009 |
9
PRIMECAP Core Fund
Fund Profile
As of March 31, 2009
Portfolio Characteristics |
|
|
|
| Comparative |
| Fund | Index1 |
Number of Stocks | 133 | 730 |
Median Market Cap | $23.6B | $32.1B |
Price/Earnings Ratio | 16.5x | 14.1x |
Price/Book Ratio | 2.1x | 1.8x |
Yield2 | 1.1% | 2.7% |
Return on Equity | 20.4% | 21.1% |
Earnings Growth Rate | 15.2% | 15.7% |
Foreign Holdings | 16.7% | 0.0% |
Turnover Rate3 | 7% | — |
Expense Ratio4 | 0.55% | — |
Short-Term Reserves | 8.0% | — |
Sector Diversification (% of equity exposure) | ||
|
| Comparative |
| Fund | Index1 |
Consumer Discretionary | 14.5% | 9.1% |
Consumer Staples | 0.8 | 12.1 |
Energy | 6.0 | 13.1 |
Financials | 5.1 | 11.4 |
Health Care | 26.2 | 14.8 |
Industrials | 11.5 | 9.7 |
Information Technology | 27.3 | 18.0 |
Materials | 8.0 | 3.6 |
Telecommunication Services | 0.4 | 3.9 |
Utilities | 0.2 | 4.3 |
Volatility Measures5 |
|
| Fund Versus |
| Comparative Index1 |
R-Squared | 0.93 |
Beta | 0.93 |
Ten Largest Holdings6 (% of total net assets) | ||
|
|
|
Eli Lilly & Co. | pharmaceuticals | 3.8% |
Amgen, Inc. | biotechnology | 3.7 |
Novartis AG ADR | pharmaceuticals | 3.2 |
Roche Holdings AG | pharmaceuticals | 2.8 |
Oracle Corp. | systems software | 2.6 |
Medtronic, Inc. | health care |
|
| equipment | 2.5 |
Intuit, Inc. | application software | 2.4 |
Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. | home furnishing |
|
| retail | 2.1 |
GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR | pharmaceuticals | 2.1 |
Google Inc. | Internet software |
|
| and services | 2.0 |
Top Ten |
| 27.2% |
Investment Focus
��
1 MSCI US Prime Market 750 Index.
2 30-day SEC yield for the fund; annualized dividend yield for the index. See the Glossary.
3 Annualized.
4 The expense ratio shown is from the prospectus dated January 15, 2009, and represents estimated costs for the current fiscal year based on the fund’s current net assets. For the six months ended March 31, 2009, the annualized expense ratio was 0.54%.
5 For an explanation of R-squared, beta, and other terms used here, see the Glossary.
6 The holdings listed exclude any temporary cash investments and equity index products.
10
PRIMECAP Core Fund
Performance Summary
All of the returns in this report represent past performance, which is not a guarantee of future results that may be achieved by the fund. (Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data cited. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit our website at www.vanguard.com/performance.) Note, too, that both investment returns and principal value can fluctuate widely, so an investor’s shares, when sold, could be worth more or less than their original cost. The returns shown do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the sale of fund shares.
Fiscal-Year Total Returns (%): December 9, 2004–March 31, 2009
Average Annual Total Returns: Periods Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Since |
| Inception Date | One Year | Inception |
PRIMECAP Core Fund2 | 12/9/2004 | –28.61% | –2.03% |
1 Six months ended March 31, 2009.
2 Total return figures do not include the 1% fee assessed on redemptions of shares held less than one year, or the account service fee that may be applicable to certain accounts with balances below $10,000.
Note: See Financial Highlights table for dividend and capital gains information.
11
PRIMECAP Core Fund
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Statement of Net Assets
As of March 31, 2009
The fund provides a complete list of its holdings four times in each fiscal year, at the quarter-ends. For the second and fourth fiscal quarters, the lists appear in the fund’s semiannual and annual reports to shareholders. For the first and third fiscal quarters, the fund files the lists with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form N-Q. Shareholders can look up the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room (see the back cover of this report for further information).
|
|
| Market |
|
|
| Value• |
|
| Shares | ($000) |
Common Stocks (92.8%) |
|
| |
Consumer Discretionary (13.5%) |
|
| |
* | Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc. | 2,276,091 | 56,333 |
* | Kohl’s Corp. | 852,700 | 36,086 |
| TJX Cos., Inc. | 1,372,725 | 35,197 |
| Sony Corp. ADR | 1,700,000 | 35,071 |
* | Amazon.com, Inc. | 450,000 | 33,048 |
* | DIRECTV Group, Inc. | 1,265,925 | 28,850 |
| Whirlpool Corp. | 843,200 | 24,950 |
* | CarMax, Inc. | 2,000,000 | 24,880 |
| The Walt Disney Co. | 1,210,000 | 21,974 |
| Best Buy Co., Inc. | 442,600 | 16,801 |
| Mattel, Inc. | 1,305,200 | 15,049 |
| Target Corp. | 396,250 | 13,627 |
^ | Nordstrom, Inc. | 440,400 | 7,377 |
| Lowe’s Cos., Inc. | 317,000 | 5,785 |
| Carnival Corp. | 220,000 | 4,752 |
* | Chico’s FAS, Inc. | 850,000 | 4,565 |
* | Viacom Inc. Class B | 100,000 | 1,738 |
| Eastman Kodak Co. | 300,000 | 1,140 |
* | Expedia, Inc. | 108,250 | 983 |
* | Interval Leisure Group, Inc. | 21,650 | 115 |
* | HSN, Inc. | 21,650 | 111 |
* | Ticketmaster |
|
|
| Entertainment Inc. | 21,650 | 80 |
|
|
| 368,512 |
Consumer Staples (0.8%) |
|
| |
| The Procter & Gamble Co. | 200,000 | 9,418 |
| Avon Products, Inc. | 340,000 | 6,538 |
| Costco Wholesale Corp. | 100,000 | 4,632 |
|
|
| 20,588 |
Energy (5.6%) |
|
| |
| Schlumberger Ltd. | 911,100 | 37,009 |
| EOG Resources, Inc. | 478,000 | 26,175 |
| EnCana Corp. |
|
|
| (New York Shares) | 557,000 | 22,620 |
* | National Oilwell Varco Inc. | 735,000 | 21,102 |
| Arch Coal, Inc. | 800,000 | 10,696 |
| Noble Energy, Inc. | 140,000 | 7,543 |
| Murphy Oil Corp. | 167,000 | 7,476 |
| ConocoPhillips Co. | 180,000 | 7,049 |
| Peabody Energy Corp. | 221,400 | 5,544 |
* | Transocean Ltd. | 45,000 | 2,648 |
* | Exterran Holdings, Inc. | 100,000 | 1,602 |
* | Pride International, Inc. | 70,000 | 1,258 |
| Petroleo Brasileiro SA |
|
|
| Series A ADR | 50,000 | 1,225 |
| Noble Corp. | 20,000 | 482 |
|
|
| 152,429 |
Financials (4.7%) |
|
| |
| Marsh & McLennan |
|
|
| Cos., Inc. | 2,380,175 | 48,199 |
* | Berkshire Hathaway Inc. |
|
|
| Class B | 12,400 | 34,968 |
| The Chubb Corp. | 360,000 | 15,235 |
| Wells Fargo & Co. | 600,000 | 8,544 |
| Discover Financial |
|
|
| Services | 1,306,400 | 8,243 |
| Progressive Corp. of Ohio | 520,000 | 6,989 |
| Bank of New York |
|
|
| Mellon Corp. | 216,982 | 6,130 |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 30,000 | 797 |
* | Tree.com, Inc. | 3,608 | 17 |
|
|
| 129,122 |
Health Care (24.3%) |
|
| |
| Eli Lilly & Co. | 3,126,000 | 104,440 |
* | Amgen Inc. | 2,025,000 | 100,278 |
| Novartis AG ADR | 2,323,600 | 87,902 |
| Roche Holdings AG | 560,500 | 76,929 |
| Medtronic, Inc. | 2,354,000 | 69,372 |
| GlaxoSmithKline PLC ADR | 1,805,400 | 56,094 |
* | Biogen Idec Inc. | 826,000 | 43,299 |
* | Boston Scientific Corp. | 4,681,300 | 37,216 |
* | Waters Corp. | 895,000 | 33,070 |
| Wyeth | 495,000 | 21,305 |
| Sanofi-Aventis ADR | 610,000 | 17,037 |
| Johnson & Johnson | 229,500 | 12,072 |
* | Sepracor Inc. | 240,400 | 3,524 |
* | Genzyme Corp. | 9,100 | 540 |
|
|
| 663,078 |
12
PRIMECAP Core Fund
|
|
| Market |
|
|
| Value• |
|
| Shares | ($000) |
Industrials (10.7%) |
|
| |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. | 917,615 | 45,165 |
| Southwest Airlines Co. | 6,027,125 | 38,152 |
| Honeywell |
|
|
| International Inc. | 1,314,000 | 36,608 |
| FedEx Corp. | 711,200 | 31,641 |
| The Boeing Co. | 872,100 | 31,029 |
| Expeditors International of |
|
|
| Washington, Inc. | 845,000 | 23,905 |
| Caterpillar, Inc. | 628,950 | 17,585 |
* | McDermott |
|
|
| International, Inc. | 1,275,000 | 17,072 |
| Union Pacific Corp. | 268,150 | 11,024 |
| Canadian Pacific |
|
|
| Railway Ltd. | 211,430 | 6,265 |
| Burlington Northern |
|
|
| Santa Fe Corp. | 100,000 | 6,015 |
* | AMR Corp. | 1,469,740 | 4,689 |
| Norfolk Southern Corp. | 122,700 | 4,141 |
| Deere & Co. | 100,000 | 3,287 |
| Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 145,000 | 3,167 |
| C.H. Robinson |
|
|
| Worldwide Inc. | 62,000 | 2,828 |
| Avery Dennison Corp. | 120,000 | 2,681 |
| Cummins Inc. | 77,700 | 1,978 |
| Goodrich Corp. | 31,000 | 1,175 |
| SPX Corp. | 20,000 | 940 |
| Chicago Bridge & |
|
|
| Iron Co. N.V. | 120,000 | 752 |
| 3M Co. | 13,000 | 646 |
|
|
| 290,745 |
Information Technology (25.3%) |
| ||
* | Oracle Corp. | 3,896,500 | 70,410 |
* | Intuit, Inc. | 2,420,000 | 65,340 |
* | Google Inc. | 160,000 | 55,690 |
| ASML Holding NV |
|
|
| (New York Shares) | 2,638,678 | 46,203 |
| Texas Instruments, Inc. | 2,470,000 | 40,780 |
| LM Ericsson Telephone |
|
|
| Co. ADR Class B | 4,684,000 | 37,893 |
* | EMC Corp. | 3,243,000 | 36,970 |
| Microsoft Corp. | 1,849,900 | 33,983 |
* | Symantec Corp. | 2,242,800 | 33,507 |
| QUALCOMM Inc. | 792,500 | 30,836 |
| Intel Corp. | 1,884,700 | 28,365 |
* | SanDisk Corp. | 2,089,500 | 26,432 |
| Corning, Inc. | 1,980,800 | 26,285 |
| Altera Corp. | 1,420,000 | 24,921 |
| Applied Materials, Inc. | 2,271,000 | 24,413 |
* | Flextronics |
|
|
| International Ltd. | 7,425,000 | 21,458 |
* | Research In Motion Ltd. | 448,600 | 19,321 |
| Accenture Ltd. | 380,500 | 10,460 |
* | eBay Inc. | 804,600 | 10,106 |
| KLA-Tencor Corp. | 383,000 | 7,660 |
* | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 439,600 | 7,372 |
| Motorola, Inc. | 1,725,000 | 7,297 |
| Hewlett-Packard Co. | 200,000 | 6,412 |
* | Yahoo! Inc. | 375,000 | 4,804 |
* | Adobe Systems, Inc. | 188,900 | 4,041 |
* | NVIDIA Corp. | 320,000 | 3,155 |
* | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | 170,000 | 2,613 |
| Xilinx, Inc. | 61,000 | 1,169 |
* | Apple Inc. | 11,000 | 1,156 |
* | IAC/InterActiveCorp | 54,125 | 824 |
* | Dell Inc. | 44,000 | 417 |
* | VMware Inc. | 17,400 | 411 |
| Intersil Corp. | 30,000 | 345 |
* | Verigy Ltd. | 20,814 | 172 |
|
|
| 691,221 |
Materials (7.4%) |
|
| |
| Potash Corp. of |
|
|
| Saskatchewan, Inc. | 601,800 | 48,631 |
| Monsanto Co. | 542,250 | 45,061 |
| Praxair, Inc. | 466,208 | 31,371 |
| Rohm & Haas Co. | 300,000 | 23,652 |
| Newmont Mining Corp. |
|
|
| (Holding Co.) | 380,000 | 17,009 |
| Vulcan Materials Co. | 300,000 | 13,287 |
| Weyerhaeuser Co. | 250,699 | 6,912 |
| Freeport-McMoRan |
|
|
| Copper & Gold, Inc. |
|
|
| Class B | 160,000 | 6,098 |
| International Paper Co. | 680,000 | 4,787 |
| Alcoa Inc. | 366,900 | 2,693 |
* | Domtar Corp. | 2,015,762 | 1,915 |
| Dow Chemical Co. | 114,300 | 964 |
|
|
| 202,380 |
Telecommunication Services (0.3%) |
| ||
* | Sprint Nextel Corp. | 2,431,150 | 8,679 |
| AT&T Inc. | 30,000 | 756 |
|
|
| 9,435 |
Utilities (0.2%) |
|
| |
* | AES Corp. | 948,000 | 5,508 |
Total Common Stocks |
|
| |
(Cost $3,384,857) |
| 2,533,018 |
13
PRIMECAP Core Fund
|
| Market |
|
| Value• |
| Shares | ($000) |
Temporary Cash Investment (8.1%) |
|
|
Money Market Fund (8.1%) |
|
|
1,2 Vanguard Market Liquidity |
|
|
Fund, 0.440% |
|
|
(Cost $221,741) | 221,740,750 | 221,741 |
Total Investments (100.9%) |
|
|
(Cost $3,606,598) |
| 2,754,759 |
Other Assets and Liabilities (–0.9%) |
|
|
Other Assets |
| 16,870 |
Liabilities2 |
| (40,967) |
|
| (24,097) |
Net Assets (100%) |
|
|
Applicable to 317,441,378 outstanding |
| |
$.001 par value shares of beneficial |
| |
interest (unlimited authorization) | 2,730,662 | |
Net Asset Value Per Share |
| $8.60 |
At March 31, 2009, net assets consisted of: | |
| Amount |
| ($000) |
Paid-in Capital | 3,646,957 |
Undistributed Net Investment Income | 7,895 |
Accumulated Net Realized Losses | (72,321) |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|
Investment Securities | (851,839) |
Foreign Currencies | (30) |
Net Assets | 2,730,662 |
• See Note A in Notes to Financial Statements.
* Non-income-producing security.
^ Part of security position is on loan to broker-dealers. The total value of securities on loan is $1,958,000.
1 Affiliated money market fund available only to Vanguard funds and certain trusts and accounts managed by Vanguard. Rate shown is the 7-day yield.
2 Includes $2,104,000 of collateral received for securities on loan. ADR—American Depositary Receipt.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
14
PRIMECAP Core Fund
Statement of Operations
| Six Months Ended |
| March 31, 2009 |
| ($000) |
Investment Income |
|
Income |
|
Dividends1 | 25,381 |
Interest2 | 1,550 |
Security Lending | 384 |
Total Income | 27,315 |
Expenses |
|
Investment Advisory Fees—Note B | 4,201 |
The Vanguard Group—Note C |
|
Management and Administrative | 2,318 |
Marketing and Distribution | 482 |
Custodian Fees | 27 |
Auditing Fees | 1 |
Shareholders’ Reports | 26 |
Trustees’ Fees and Expenses | 2 |
Total Expenses | 7,057 |
Net Investment Income | 20,258 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) |
|
Investment Securities Sold | (57,208) |
Foreign Currencies | (75) |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | (57,283) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) |
|
Investment Securities | (740,471) |
Foreign Currencies | (17) |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | (740,488) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (777,513) |
1 Dividends are net of foreign withholding taxes of $1,058,000.
2 Interest income from an affiliated company of the fund was $1,550,000.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
15
PRIMECAP Core Fund
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| March 31, |
| September 30, |
| 2009 |
| 2008 |
| ($000) |
| ($000) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets |
|
|
|
Operations |
|
|
|
Net Investment Income | 20,258 |
| 37,049 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | (57,283) |
| 730 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | (740,488) |
| (643,827) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | (777,513) |
| (606,048) |
Distributions |
|
|
|
Net Investment Income | (34,373) |
| (26,723) |
Realized Capital Gain1 | — |
| (56,117) |
Total Distributions | (34,373) |
| (82,840) |
Capital Share Transactions |
|
|
|
Issued | 635,130 |
| 1,112,307 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 30,939 |
| 74,752 |
Redeemed2 | (376,464) |
| (550,567) |
Net Increase (Decrease) from Capital Share Transactions | 289,605 |
| 636,492 |
Total Increase (Decrease) | (522,281) |
| (52,396) |
Net Assets |
|
|
|
Beginning of Period | 3,252,943 |
| 3,305,339 |
End of Period3 | 2,730,662 |
| 3,252,943 |
1 Includes fiscal 2008 short-term gain distributions totaling $15,062,000. Short-term gain distributions are treated as ordinary income dividends for tax purposes.
2 Net of redemption fees for fiscal 2009 and 2008 of $700,000 and $799,000, respectively.
3 Net Assets—End of Period includes undistributed net investment income of $7,895,000 and $22,085,000. See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
16
PRIMECAP Core Fund
Financial Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Six Months |
|
|
| Dec. 9, |
| Ended |
| 20041 to | ||
| March 31, | Year Ended September 30, | Sept. 30, | ||
For a Share Outstanding Throughout Each Period | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $11.41 | $14.03 | $12.28 | $10.98 | $10.00 |
Investment Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income | .067 | .1382 | .095 | .090 | .030 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
on Investments | (2.760) | (2.417) | 1.861 | 1.289 | .950 |
Total from Investment Operations | (2.693) | (2.279) | 1.956 | 1.379 | .980 |
Distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from Net Investment Income | (.117) | (.110) | (.095) | (.050) | — |
Distributions from Realized Capital Gains | — | (.231) | (.111) | (.029) | — |
Total Distributions | (.117) | (.341) | (.206) | (.079) | — |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $8.60 | $11.41 | $14.03 | $12.28 | $10.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return3 | –23.60% | –16.52% | 16.10% | 12.61% | 9.80% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $2,731 | $3,253 | $3,305 | $2,208 | $942 |
Ratio of Total Expenses to Average Net Assets | 0.54%4 | 0.50% | 0.55% | 0.60% | 0.72%4 |
Ratio of Net Investment Income to |
|
|
|
|
|
Average Net Assets | 1.55%4 | 1.12%2 | 0.73% | 0.90% | 0.58%4 |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 7%4 | 9% | 10% | 5% | 6% |
1 Inception.
2 Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income to average net assets include $.027 and 0.23%, respectively, resulting from a special dividend from ASML Holding NV in October 2007.
3 Total returns do not reflect the 1% fee assessed on redemptions of shares held less than one year, or the account service fee that may be applicable to certain accounts with balances below $10,000.
4 Annualized.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
17
PRIMECAP Core Fund
Notes to Financial Statements
Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end investment company, or mutual fund.
A. The following significant accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles for U.S. mutual funds. The fund consistently follows such policies in preparing its financial statements.
1. Security Valuation: Securities are valued as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m., Eastern time) on the valuation date. Equity securities are valued at the latest quoted sales prices or official closing prices taken from the primary market in which each security trades; such securities not traded on the valuation date are valued at the mean of the latest quoted bid and asked prices. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or whose values have been affected by events occurring before the fund’s pricing time but after the close of the securities’ primary markets, are valued at their fair values calculated according to procedures adopted by the board of trustees. These procedures include obtaining quotations from an independent pricing service, monitoring news to identify significant market- or security-specific events, and evaluating changes in the values of foreign market proxies (for example, ADRs, futures contracts, or exchange-traded funds), between the time the foreign markets close and the fund’s pricing time. When fair-value pricing is employed, the prices of securities used by a fund to calculate its net asset value may differ from quoted or published prices for the same securities. Investments in Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund are valued at that fund’s net asset value.
2. Foreign Currency: Securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars using exchange rates obtained from an independent third party as of the fund’s pricing time on the valuation date. Realized gains (losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investment securities include the effects of changes in exchange rates since the securities were purchased, combined with the effects of changes in security prices. Fluctuations in the value of other assets and liabilities resulting from changes in exchange rates are recorded as unrealized foreign currency gains (losses) until the assets or liabilities are settled in cash, at which time they are recorded as realized foreign currency gains (losses).
3. Federal Income Taxes: The fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its taxable income. Management has analyzed the fund’s tax positions taken on federal income tax returns for all open tax years (tax years ended September 30, 2005–2008) and for the period ended March 31, 2009, and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the fund’s financial statements.
4. Distributions: Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
5. Security Lending: The fund may lend its securities to qualified institutional borrowers to earn additional income. Security loans are required to be secured at all times by collateral at least equal to the market value of securities loaned. The fund invests cash collateral received in Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund, and records a liability for the return of the collateral, during the period the securities are on loan. Security lending income represents the income earned on investing cash collateral, less expenses associated with the loan.
6. Other: Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income includes income distributions received from Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund and is accrued daily. Security transactions are accounted for on the date securities are bought or sold. Costs used to determine realized gains (losses) on the sale of investment securities are those of the specific securities sold. Fees assessed on redemptions of capital shares are credited to paid-in capital.
18
PRIMECAP Core Fund
B. PRIMECAP Management Company provides investment advisory services to the fund for a fee calculated at an annual percentage rate of average net assets. For the six months ended March 31, 2009, the investment advisory fee represented an effective annual rate of 0.32% of the fund’s average net assets.
C. The Vanguard Group furnishes at cost corporate management, administrative, marketing, and distribution services. The costs of such services are allocated to the fund under methods approved by the board of trustees. The fund has committed to provide up to 0.40% of its net assets in capital contributions to Vanguard. At March 31, 2009, the fund had contributed capital of $675,000 to Vanguard (included in Other Assets), representing 0.02% of the fund’s net assets and 0.27% of Vanguard’s capitalization. The fund’s trustees and officers are also directors and officers of Vanguard.
D. Distributions are determined on a tax basis and may differ from net investment income and realized capital gains for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statements to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain, or loss are recognized in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes; these differences will reverse at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.
During the six months ended March 31, 2009, the fund realized net foreign currency losses of $75,000, which decreased distributable net income for tax purposes; accordingly, such losses have been reclassified from accumulated net realized losses to undistributed net investment income.
The fund’s tax-basis capital gains and losses are determined only at the end of each fiscal year. For tax purposes, at September 30, 2008, the fund had available realized losses of $15,115,000 to offset future net capital gains through September 30, 2017. The fund will use these capital losses to offset net taxable capital gains, if any, realized during the year ending September 30, 2009; should the fund realize net capital losses for the year, the losses will be added to the loss carryforward balance above.
At March 31, 2009, the cost of investment securities for tax purposes was $3,606,598,000. Net unrealized depreciation of investment securities for tax purposes was $851,839,000, consisting of unrealized gains of $135,545,000 on securities that had risen in value since their purchase and $987,384,000 in unrealized losses on securities that had fallen in value since their purchase.
E. During the six months ended March 31, 2009, the fund purchased $596,901,000 of investment securities and sold $88,881,000 of investment securities, other than temporary cash investments.
F. Capital shares issued and redeemed were:
| Six Months Ended |
| Year Ended |
| March 31, 2009 |
| September 30, 2008 |
| Shares |
| Shares |
| (000) |
| (000) |
Issued | 72,059 |
| 87,101 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 3,602 |
| 5,799 |
Redeemed | (43,325) |
| (43,408) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 32,336 |
| 49,492 |
19
PRIMECAP Core Fund
G. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“FAS 157”), “Fair Value Measurements.” FAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements in financial statements.
The various inputs that may be used to determine the value of the fund’s investments are summarized in three broad levels. The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2—Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—Significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions used to determine the fair value of investments).
The following table summarizes the fund’s investments as of March 31, 2009, based on the inputs used to value them:
| Investments |
| in Securities |
Valuation Inputs | ($000) |
Level 1—Quoted prices | 2,677,830 |
Level 2—Other significant observable inputs | 76,929 |
Level 3—Significant unobservable inputs | — |
Total | 2,754,759 |
20
About Your Fund’s Expenses
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur ongoing costs, which include costs for portfolio management, administrative services, and shareholder reports (like this one), among others. Operating expenses, which are deducted from a fund’s gross income, directly reduce the investment return of the fund.
A fund’s expenses are expressed as a percentage of its average net assets. This figure is known as the expense ratio. The following examples are intended to help you understand the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with those of other mutual funds. The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period shown and held for the entire period.
The accompanying table illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:
• Based on actual fund return. This section helps you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The “Ending Account Value” shown is derived from the fund’s actual return, and the third column shows the dollar amount that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.
To do so, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number given for your fund under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period.”
• Based on hypothetical 5% yearly return. This section is intended to help you compare your fund’s costs with those of other mutual funds. It assumes that the fund had a yearly return of 5% before expenses, but that the expense ratio is unchanged. In this case—because the return used is not the fund’s actual return—the results do not apply to your investment. The example is useful in making comparisons because the Securities and Exchange Commission requires all mutual funds to calculate expenses based on a 5% return. You can assess your fund’s costs by comparing this hypothetical example with the hypothetical examples that appear in shareholder reports of other funds.
Six Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses |
| Account Value | Account Value | Paid During |
PRIMECAP Core Fund | 9/30/2008 | 3/31/2009 | Period1 |
Based on Actual Fund Return | $1,000.00 | $763.99 | $2.37 |
Based on Hypothetical 5% Yearly Return | 1,000.00 | 1,022.24 | 2.72 |
Note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare ongoing costs only and do not reflect transaction costs incurred by the fund for buying and selling securities. Further, the expenses do not include the 1% fee on redemptions of shares held for less than one year, nor do they include the account service fee described in the prospectus. If such fees were applied to your account, your costs would be higher. Your fund does not carry a “sales load.”
1 The calculations are based on expenses incurred in the most recent six-month period. The fund’s annualized six-month expense ratio for that period is 0.54%. The dollar amounts shown as “Expenses Paid” are equal to the annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by the number of days in the most recent 12-month period.
21
The calculations assume no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.
You can find more information about the fund’s expenses, including annual expense ratios, in the Financial Statements section of this report. For additional information on operating expenses and other shareholder costs, please refer to your fund’s current prospectus.
22
Trustees Approve Advisory Agreement
The board of trustees of Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund has renewed the fund’s investment advisory agreement with PRIMECAP Management Company. The board determined that the retention of PRIMECAP Management was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
The board based its decision upon an evaluation of the advisor’s investment staff, portfolio management process, and performance. The trustees considered the factors discussed below, among others. However, no single factor determined whether the board approved the agreement. Rather, it was the totality of the circumstances that drove the board’s decision.
Nature, extent, and quality of services
The board considered the quality of the fund’s investment management since its inception in 2004, and took into account the organizational depth and stability of the firm. The board noted that PRIMECAP Management, founded in 1983, is recognized for its long-term approach to equity investing. The firm has managed Vanguard PRIMECAP Core Fund since its inception.
Six experienced portfolio managers are responsible for separate sub-portfolios, and each portfolio manager employs a fundamental, research-driven approach in seeking to identify companies with long-term potential overlooked by the market and whose stock is trading at attractive valuation levels.
The board concluded that the advisor’s experience, stability, depth, and performance, among other factors, warranted continuation of the advisory agreement.
Investment performance
The board considered the fund’s performance since inception, noting that it performed competitively versus its benchmark index and the average return of its peer group during that period. The board concluded that the fund has performed in line with expectations, and that its results have been consistent with the fund’s investment strategy. Information about the fund’s most recent performance can be found in the Performance Summary section of this report.
Cost
The board concluded that the fund’s expense ratio was far below the average expense ratio charged by funds in its peer group. The board noted that the fund’s advisory fee was also well below the peer-group average. Information about the fund’s expense ratio appears in the About Your Fund’s Expenses section of this report as well as in the Financial Statements section, which also includes information about the advisory fee rate.
The board did not consider profitability of PRIMECAP Management in determining whether to approve the advisory fee, because PRIMECAP Management is independent of Vanguard, and the advisory fee is the result of arm’s-length negotiations.
The benefit of economies of scale
The board concluded that the fund’s shareholders benefit from economies of scale because of the breakpoints in the fund’s advisory fee schedule. The breakpoints reduce the effective rate of the fee as the fund’s assets increase.
The board will consider whether to renew the advisory agreement again after a one-year period.
23
Glossary
Beta. A measure of the magnitude of a fund’s past share-price fluctuations in relation to the ups and downs of a given market index. The index is assigned a beta of 1.00. Compared with a given index, a fund with a beta of 1.20 typically would have seen its share price rise or fall by 12% when the index rose or fell by 10%. For this report, beta is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index. Note that a fund’s beta should be reviewed in conjunction with its R-squared (see definition). The lower the R-squared, the less correlation there is between the fund and the index, and the less reliable beta is as an indicator of volatility.
Earnings Growth Rate. The average annual rate of growth in earnings over the past five years for the stocks now in a fund.
Equity Exposure. A measure that reflects a fund’s investments in stocks and stock futures. Any holdings in short-term reserves are excluded.
Expense Ratio. The percentage of a fund’s average net assets used to pay its annual administrative and advisory expenses. These expenses directly reduce returns to investors.
Foreign Holdings. The percentage of a fund represented by stocks or depositary receipts of companies based outside the United States.
Inception Date. The date on which the assets of a fund (or one of its share classes) are first invested in accordance with the fund’s investment objective. For funds with a subscription period, the inception date is the day after that period ends. Investment performance is measured from the inception date.
Median Market Cap. An indicator of the size of companies in which a fund invests; the midpoint of market capitalization (market price x shares outstanding) of a fund’s stocks, weighted by the proportion of the fund’s assets invested in each stock. Stocks representing half of the fund’s assets have market capitalizations above the median, and the rest are below it.
Price/Book Ratio. The share price of a stock divided by its net worth, or book value, per share. For a fund, the weighted average price/book ratio of the stocks it holds.
Price/Earnings Ratio. The ratio of a stock’s current price to its per-share earnings over the past year. For a fund, the weighted average P/E of the stocks it holds. P/E is an indicator of market expectations about corporate prospects; the higher the P/E, the greater the expectations for a company’s future growth.
R-Squared. A measure of how much of a fund’s past returns can be explained by the returns from the market in general, as measured by a given index. If a fund’s total returns were precisely synchronized with an index’s returns, its R-squared would be 1.00. If the fund’s returns bore no relationship to the index’s returns, its R-squared would be 0. For this report, R-squared is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index.
Return on Equity. The annual average rate of return generated by a company during the past five years for each dollar of shareholder’s equity (net income divided by shareholder’s equity). For a fund, the weighted average return on equity for the companies whose stocks it holds.
Short-Term Reserves. The percentage of a fund invested in highly liquid, short-term securities that can be readily converted to cash.
24
Turnover Rate. An indication of the fund’s trading activity. Funds with high turnover rates incur higher transaction costs and may be more likely to distribute capital gains (which may be taxable to investors). The turnover rate excludes in-kind transactions, which have minimal impact on costs.
Yield. A fund’s 30-day SEC yield is derived using a formula specified by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the formula, data related to the fund’s security holdings in the previous 30 days are used to calculate the fund’s hypothetical net income for that period, which is then annualized and divided by the fund’s estimated average net assets over the calculation period. For the purposes of this calculation, a security’s income is based on its current market yield to maturity (in the case of bonds) or its projected dividend yield (for stocks). Because the SEC yield represents hypothetical annualized income, it will differ—at times significantly—from the fund’s actual experience. As a result, the fund’s income distributions may be higher or lower than implied by the SEC yield.
25
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank.
The People Who Govern Your Fund
The trustees of your mutual fund are there to see that the fund is operated and managed in your best interests since, as a shareholder, you are a part owner of the fund. Your fund’s trustees also serve on the board of directors of The Vanguard Group, Inc., which is owned by the Vanguard funds and provides services to them on an at-cost basis.
A majority of Vanguard’s board members are independent, meaning that they have no affiliation with Vanguard or the funds they oversee, apart from the sizable personal investments they have made as private individuals. The independent board members have distinguished backgrounds in business, academia, and public service. Each of the trustees and executive officers oversees 157 Vanguard funds.
The following table provides information for each trustee and executive officer of the fund. More information about the trustees is in the Statement of Additional Information, which can be obtained, without charge, by contacting Vanguard at 800-662-7447, or online at www.vanguard.com.
Chairman of the Board and Interested Trustee
John J. Brennan1
Born 1954. Trustee Since May 1987. Chairman of the Board. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Chairman of the Board and Director/Trustee of The Vanguard Group, Inc., and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group; Chief Executive Officer and President of The Vanguard Group and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (1996–2008).
Independent Trustees
Charles D. Ellis
Born 1937. Trustee Since January 2001. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Applecore Partners (pro bono ventures in education); Senior Advisor to Greenwich Associates (international business strategy consulting); Successor Trustee of Yale University; Overseer of the Stern School of Business at New York University; Trustee of the Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research.
Emerson U. Fullwood
Born 1948. Trustee Since January 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Retired Executive Chief Staff and Marketing Officer for North America and Corporate Vice President of Xerox Corporation (photocopiers and printers); Director of SPX Corporation (multi-industry manufacturing), the United Way of Rochester, the Boy Scouts of America, Amerigroup Corporation (direct health and medical insurance carriers), and Monroe Community College Foundation.
Rajiv L. Gupta
Born 1945. Trustee Since December 2001.2 Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rohm and Haas Co. (chemicals); President of Rohm and Haas Co. (2006–2008); Board Member of American Chemistry Council; Director of Tyco International, Ltd. (diversified manufacturing and services) and Hewlett-Packard Co. (electronic computer manufacturing); Trustee of The Conference Board.
Amy Gutmann
Born 1949. Trustee Since June 2006. Principal
Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: President of the University of Pennsylvania; Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science in the School of Arts and Sciences with Secondary Appointments at the Annenberg School for Communication and the Graduate School of Education of the University of Pennsylvania; Director of Carnegie Corporation of New York, Schuylkill River Development Corporation, and Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce; Trustee of the National Constitution Center.
JoAnn Heffernan Heisen
Born 1950. Trustee Since July 1998. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Retired Corporate Vice President, Chief Global Diversity Officer, and Member of the Executive Committee of Johnson & Johnson (pharmaceuticals/consumer products); Vice President and Chief Information Officer (1997–2005) of Johnson & Johnson; Director of the University Medical Center at Princeton and Women’s Research and Education Institute.
André F. Perold
Born 1952. Trustee Since December 2004. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: George Gund Professor of Finance and Banking, Senior Associate Dean, and Director of Faculty Recruiting, Harvard Business School; Director and Chairman of UNX, Inc. (equities trading firm); Chair of the Investment Committee of HighVista Strategies LLC (private investment firm).
Alfred M. Rankin, Jr.
Born 1941. Trustee Since January 1993. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of NACCO Industries, Inc. (forklift trucks/housewares/ lignite); Director of Goodrich Corporation (industrial products/aircraft systems and services).
J. Lawrence Wilson
Born 1936. Trustee Since April 1985. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rohm and Haas Co. (chemicals); Director of Cummins Inc. (diesel engines) and AmerisourceBergen Corp. (pharmaceutical distribution); Trustee of Vanderbilt University and of Culver Educational Foundation.
Executive Officers
Thomas J. Higgins1
Born 1957. Chief Financial Officer Since September 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Principal of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Chief Financial Officer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2008; Treasurer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (1998–2008).
Kathryn J. Hyatt1
Born 1955. Treasurer Since November 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Principal of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Treasurer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2008; Assistant Treasurer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (1988–2008).
F. William McNabb III1
Born 1957. Chief Executive Officer Since August 2008. President Since March 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Director of The Vanguard Group, Inc., since 2008; Chief Executive Officer and President of The Vanguard Group and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2008; Director of Vanguard Marketing Corporation; Managing Director of The Vanguard Group (1995–2008).
Heidi Stam1
Born 1956. Secretary Since July 2005. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years: Managing Director of The Vanguard Group, Inc., since 2006; General Counsel of The Vanguard Group since 2005; Secretary of The Vanguard Group and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group since 2005; Director and Senior Vice President of Vanguard Marketing Corporation since 2005; Principal of The Vanguard Group (1997–2006).
Vanguard Senior Management Team | |
|
|
|
|
R. Gregory Barton | Michael S. Miller |
Mortimer J. Buckley | James M. Norris |
Kathleen C. Gubanich | Glenn W. Reed |
Paul A. Heller | George U. Sauter |
Founder
John C. Bogle
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, 1974–1996
1 These individuals are “interested persons” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
2 December 2002 for Vanguard Equity Income Fund, Vanguard Growth Equity Fund, the Vanguard Municipal Bond Funds, and the Vanguard State Tax-Exempt Funds.
P.O. Box 2600
Valley Forge, PA 19482-2600
Connect with Vanguard® > www.vanguard.com
Fund Information > 800-662-7447 | All comparative mutual fund data are from Lipper Inc. |
| or Morningstar, Inc., unless otherwise noted. |
Direct Investor Account Services > 800-662-2739 |
|
| You can obtain a free copy of Vanguard’s proxy voting |
Institutional Investor Services > 800-523-1036 | guidelines by visiting our website, www.vanguard.com, |
| and searching for “proxy voting guidelines,” or by |
Text Telephone for People | calling Vanguard at 800-662-2739. The guidelines are |
With Hearing Impairment > 800-952-3335 | also available from the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. |
| In addition, you may obtain a free report on how your |
| fund voted the proxies for securities it owned during |
| the 12 months ended June 30. To get the report, visit |
This material may be used in conjunction | either www.vanguard.com or www.sec.gov. |
with the offering of shares of any Vanguard |
|
fund only if preceded or accompanied by |
|
the fund’s current prospectus. |
|
|
|
| You can review and copy information about your fund |
| at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. |
| To find out more about this public service, call the SEC |
The funds or securities referred to herein are not | at 202-551-8090. Information about your fund is also |
sponsored, endorsed, or promoted by MSCI, and MSCI | available on the SEC’s website, and you can receive |
bears no liability with respect to any such funds or | copies of this information, for a fee, by sending a |
securities. For any such funds or securities, the | request in either of two ways: via e-mail addressed to |
prospectus or the Statement of Additional Information | publicinfo@sec.gov or via regular mail addressed to the |
contains a more detailed description of the limited | Public Reference Section, Securities and Exchange |
relationship MSCI has with The Vanguard Group and | Commission, Washington, DC 20549-0102. |
any related funds. |
|
|
|
|
|
Russell is a trademark of The Frank Russell Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| © 2009 The Vanguard Group, Inc. |
| All rights reserved. |
| Vanguard Marketing Corporation, Distributor. |
|
|
| Q12202 052009 |
Item 2: Not Applicable.
Item 3: Not Applicable.
Item 4: Not Applicable.
Item 5: Not Applicable.
Item 6: Not Applicable.
Item 7: Not Applicable.
Item 8: Not Applicable.
Item 9: Not Applicable.
Item 10: Not Applicable.
Item 11: Controls and Procedures.
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Principal Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrant's Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on their evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no significant changes in Registrant’s Internal Control Over Financial Reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect this control subsequent to the date of the evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Item 12: Exhibits.
(a) Code of Ethics.
(b) Certifications.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| VANGUARD FENWAY FUNDS |
BY: | /s/ F. WILLIAM MCNABB III* |
| F. WILLIAM MCNABB III |
| CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
Date: May 18, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| VANGUARD FENWAY FUNDS |
BY: | /s/ F. WILLIAM MCNABB III* |
| F. WILLIAM MCNABB III |
| CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
Date: May 18, 2009
| VANGUARD FENWAY FUNDS |
BY: | /s/ THOMAS J. HIGGINS* |
| THOMAS J. HIGGINS |
| CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
Date: May 18, 2009
* By: /s/ Heidi Stam
Heidi Stam, pursuant to a Power of Attorney filed on January 18, 2008, see file Number 2-29601, Incorporated by Reference; and pursuant to a Power of Attorney filed on September 26, 2008, see File Number 2-47371, Incorporated by Reference.