UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-5867
Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
6803 South Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Cynthia Lo Bessette
OFI Global Asset Management, Inc.
225 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10281-1008
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (303) 768-3200
Date of fiscal year end: July 31
Date of reporting period: 7/31/2018
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g540871dsp01.jpg)
Table of Contents
Class A Shares
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS AT 7/31/18
| | | | | | |
| | Class A Shares of the Fund | | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | With Sales Charge | | Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index |
1-Year | | 5.22% | | 0.22% | | 0.99% |
5-Year | | 3.81 | | 2.81 | | 3.76 |
10-Year | | 4.56 | | 4.06 | | 4.41 |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and a 4.75% maximum applicable sales charge except where “without sales charge” is indicated. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investment. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677).
Our Twitter handle is @RochesterFunds.
|
2 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
Fund Performance Discussion
Oppenheimer Rochester New Jersey Municipal Fund once again generated high levels of tax-free income during the 12-month reporting period that ended July 31, 2018. The Class A shares provided a yield-driven, annual total return of 5.22% at net asset value (NAV) and a distribution yield of 2.76% at NAV. The Fund outperformed the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, its benchmark, by 423 basis points. Tax-free income comprised over 60% of this Fund’s total return this reporting period, further evidence supporting our focus on yield as the long-term driver of performance.
MARKET OVERVIEW
The first quarter-point increase of this reporting period was announced after the FOMC’s December 2017 meeting. The rate was also raised in March and June 2018. The Fed Funds target rate remained unchanged at its July meeting. The FOMC’s policy statement issued after that meeting repeatedly referred to the economy and labor markets as “strong” and signaled that subsequent rate rises will be needed to keep the economy steady. A majority of officials at the July meeting suggested at least two more rate increases this year.
The target range, which was set to the range of zero to 0.25% between December 2008 and December 2015, has had six increases of 0.25 percentage points to date.
The Fed’s efforts to “normalize” its balance sheet, which began in October 2017 with reductions of $10 billion a month, continued throughout this reporting period. The Fed has said that it expects reductions to reach $50 billion a month by year-end 2018.
During this reporting period, the muni market’s reactions to the Fed’s
| | | | |
YIELDS & DISTRIBUTIONS FOR CLASS A SHARES | | | | |
Dividend Yield w/o sales charge | | | 2.76% | |
Dividend Yield with sales charge | | | 2.63 | |
Standardized Yield | | | 1.47 | |
Taxable Equivalent Yield | | | 2.75 | |
Last distribution (7/24/18 ) | | $ | 0.021 | |
Total distributions (8/1/17 to 7/31/18) | | $ | 0.283 | |
| |
Endnotes for this discussion begin on page 14 of this report. | | | | |
|
3 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
announcements did not appear to be especially significant or lasting.
In December 2017, President Donald J. Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The top federal income tax rate for 2018 was lowered to 37%, from 39.6%. Although it had been targeted for elimination, the federal tax exemption on the net investment income generated by muni bonds and muni bond funds remained intact. Additionally, this income will continue to be exempt from the 3.8% tax on unearned income that applies to the income generated by investments in other asset classes.
At the end of this reporting period, the ICE BofA Merrill Lynch AAA Municipal Securities Index – the AAA subset of the broader ICE BofA Merrill Lynch US Municipal Securities Index – yielded 2.41%, 66 basis points higher than at the reporting period’s outset.
The high-grade muni yield curve as a whole rose during this reporting period, though yields at the short end of the curve rose more than yields on securities with maturities of 10 years or longer. The rise in the Treasury curve was also greater at the short end of the curve. The Treasury curve continued to flatten during this reporting period, giving investors in government securities fewer incentives to purchase longer-maturity bonds; a flatter curve typically reflects an expectation of rising rates. The muni yield curve remained relatively flat as of July 31, 2018; it was somewhat steeper at the outset of this reporting period than at the end. As a result of the changes in
the two yield curves, as of end of July, 30-year AAA-rated munis were considered cheap to 30-year Treasuries.
On a nominal basis, Treasury yields were higher than the yields on AAA-rated munis with comparable maturities as of July 31, 2018. Nonetheless, a AAA-rated muni with a maturity of 10 years would provide more income on an after-tax basis than a 10-year Treasury security for New Jersey taxpayers in all but the two lowest 2018 federal tax brackets. The yields on the 30-year Treasury and AAA-rated muni were virtually identical at the end of this reporting period, meaning that nearly every taxpayer would earn more on an after-tax basis by investing in the muni versus the Treasury. Treasury bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, while municipal securities are exempt from federal income taxes and, where applicable, state and local income taxes as well.
This reporting period was also characterized by credit spread tightening, which occurs when the difference between yields on low-rated municipal bonds and higher-rated bonds decreases. As credit spreads tighten, investments in lower-rated and unrated securities typically outperform municipal securities with higher credit ratings.
Avoiding a government shutdown, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy struck a $37.4 billion budget deal at the last minute, the first for the Democratic governor sworn into office in January 2018. The budget includes a 2% tax on corporations with more than $1
|
4 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
million in annual earnings, increased funding for New Jersey Transit, pre-K education, and a $3.2 billion payment to the state’s pension system; the cash infusion into the pension fund, we believe, is a credit positive in that it demonstrates the state’s greater political will to meet its pension obligations. As an aside, the state was the last in the nation to finalize its fiscal 2019 budget.
The fiscal 2019 budget also contains a multimillionaires’ marginal tax rate of 10.75% that will help raise revenue for education, transportation, and public pensions; the marginal rate of 8.97% continues to apply to individuals earning more than $500,000 and the new tax kicks in once income surpasses $5 million and is retroactive to January 1, 2018. The Garden State’s sales tax will remain 6.25%, and higher gasoline taxes are expected to help fund infrastructure repairs.
While the Garden State’s sales tax remains unchanged – at 6.25% -- sales tax collections in New Jersey are poised to rise significantly in light of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in South Dakota vs. Wayfair. The governor’s office estimates that the Court’s decision requiring certain online retailers to collect taxes will lead to an additional $125 million in tax revenues this fiscal year. The federal Government Accountability Office, however, indicates that the additional revenue from the online purchases by New Jersey residents could reach $351 million.
A second recent Supreme Court ruling could also have a positive effect on New Jersey’s
labor costs and its negotiating power. In a 5-4 ruling, the Court decided that unions cannot compel those who do not wish to join the union to pay an “agency fee.” As a long-term result, unions may eventually shrink and face reduced bargaining power.
The state’s Treasury Department projected in April 2018 that income tax collections during fiscal year 2019, which runs through June 30, 2019, will be $1.25 billion higher than in the previous fiscal year, with nearly half of the growth attributable to wage and employment gains.
According to the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement, the state’s three sports betting facilities had $3.5 million in gross revenue in the latter half of June 2018, taking in nearly 25% of the $16 million wagered. A recent study predicts that New Jersey’s revenues from sports betting will fall in the range of $330 million to $650 million. This new revenue stream is expected to rise significantly during football season.
State senators passed legislation at the end of the reporting period to restructure the board of New Jersey Transit and increase commuter involvement in decisions that affect the nation’s third-busiest rail public transportation system. Plagued by years of deficits and revenue shortfalls, the NJ Transit agency will also undergo an audit ordered by Gov. Murphy.
The New Jersey Economic Development Authority (NJEDA), which issued $350 million
|
5 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
in bonds in September 2017, returned to the market in January 2018 with $376 million in bonds that the NJEDA had authorized the prior month. Some New Jersey lawmakers filed suit in the Mercer County Superior Court to block this second bond offering on the grounds that it required voter approval. The agency prevailed, and the bond sale occurred as planned. Proceeds will be used to finance two new buildings for the state’s departments of taxation, agriculture and health.
The Garden State’s American Dream Meadowlands megamall project, located in East Rutherford, is expected to deliver billions in tax revenues from a variety of sources, including sales and income taxes, over the next two decades. The megamall is slated to open in March 2019.
Late in the reporting period, the U.S. Department of Transportation agreed to extend the deadline related to federal grants that the state hopes will help defray some of the $1.7 billion cost of replacing the Portal North Bridge. New Jersey officials have said that they hope financing for the bridge will be included in the U.S. government’s financial assistance for the Gateway Project, which calls for new rail tunnels beneath the Hudson River.
As of July 31, 2018, New Jersey’s general obligation (G.O.) bonds were rated A3 by Moody’s, A-minus by S&P Global Ratings, and A by Fitch Ratings. G.O.s are backed by the full faith and taxing authority of the state or local government that issues them.
The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the federal oversight board established by PROMESA (the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act) continued to generate headlines throughout this reporting period; additional information about the developments in Puerto Rico can be found on our online PR Roundup (oppenheimerfunds.com/puerto-rico).
At the end of this reporting period, some 10 months after Hurricane Maria, power was not fully restored across the Commonwealth. Despite the hurricane’s impact during the final quarter of 2017, Puerto Rico’s retail sales rose 10.7% in 2017, and bonds issued by the Commonwealth (in aggregate) have rallied during this reporting period.
PREPA, the Commonwealth’s energy utilities authority, remained a focal point during this reporting period. In January 2018, creditors raised concerns about a plan to loan $1.3 billion to PREPA and the government’s proposal to privatize PREPA, among other issues; in a decision favorable to bondholders, U.S. District Court Judge Laura Taylor Swain rejected the proposed loan. Investors will recall that PREPA failed to make its July 2017 debt payment and has made no debt-service payments since. Its cash on hand continues to be more than projected, according to officials in Puerto Rico.
In July 2018, a board shakeup ensued after Gov. Ricardo Rosselló Nevares appointed Rafael Diaz-Granados as PREPA’s new executive director, replacing Walter Higgins,
|
6 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
who held the position for four months. Diaz-Granados quit after one day over a pay dispute, and four other board members also resigned in protest. Jose Ortiz, who had previously led PRASA, the Commonwealth’s aqueduct and sewer authority, returned to PREPA; he had been the board’s chairman from 2011 to 2013. Ortiz became the fifth person to lead PREPA since the hurricane hit.
Ortiz has expressed interest in selling some of PREPA’s power plants. The governor remains an advocate for privatization, a solution that typically requires assumption of debt. He has also said the federal government is not qualified to take over the utility and has asked Congress to provide PREPA with $30 billion for modernization efforts.
At the very end of this reporting period, the oversight board established under PROMESA, the government of Puerto Rico, and certain bondholders, including OppenheimerFunds, reached a new restructuring support agreement (RSA) for PREPA debt. The pact, which has not been finalized, comes 13 months after the oversight board voted against an RSA that had been reached in September 2015 and extended numerous times. Like the earlier RSA, the new agreement is designed to reduce PREPA’s debt burden and protect the best interests of Fund shareholders.
As anticipated, Hurricane Maria had an adverse impact on sales and use tax (SUT) collections during fiscal year 2018, which ended June 30. At $2.52 billion for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2018, SUT collections were 1.2% lower than in the previous fiscal year. The ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in South Dakota vs. Wayfair is expected to increase Puerto Rico’s sales tax collections by an estimated $40 million annually, according to Puerto Rico’s Treasury Department.
Prices on many bonds issued in Puerto Rico rose materially on news of an agreement between an agent of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and an agent of the COFINA bondholders. Negotiations are ongoing and many details need to be worked out, but a preliminary structure for a settlement was reached in mid-June 2018. Judge Swain has approved the segregating SUT collections into three separate pools, as stipulated in the agreement. Among other provisions, the agreement calls for bondholders to receive the $1.2 billion in unpaid debt service that the Bank of New York-Mellon, the COFINA trustee, has amassed. Very early in this reporting period, the Commonwealth said its deposits with the BoNY trustee had already satisfied its fiscal 2018 requirements related to the COFINA debt.
Puerto Rico did not make debt payments on its G.O. securities during this reporting period, despite a requirement in the Commonwealth’s Constitution that general fund revenues be used to pay G.O. debt service ahead of any other government expense. The legal protections for our G.O. holdings have not yet been tested before a court.
|
7 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
In June 2018, officials in the Commonwealth’s Treasury Department said that general fund revenues for the first 11 months of fiscal year 2018 were $78.9 million, or 1%, ahead of projections. Treasury officials also said then that they anticipate that revenues for the entire fiscal year will also exceed projections, but those figures had not been released as of July 31, 2018.
On the last day of the reporting period, the government reported that Puerto Rico’s latest cash position had reached its highest level in at least a year: As of July 20, 2018, Puerto Rico had $3.23 billion in cash, topping the high point of fiscal 2018 by more than $100 million.
In other positive economic news, the employment level in June was higher than at any time since October 2013. At 9.3%, the unemployment rate remained high relative to the U.S. rate, but was nonetheless the lowest monthly rate since at least 1975, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Puerto Rico’s Department of Labor and Human Resources, meanwhile, says the annual rate is the lowest since at least 1941.
During the reporting period, the oversight board, the Rosselló administration, legislators, and owners of Puerto Rico debt remained at odds about the extent of the board’s authority, with significant debate about the budget and fiscal plan proposals that have been drafted and repeatedly revised. While it intended to certify a plan by late March, the oversight board extended the
deadline and said that the new plan must demonstrate “consistency with historical actual expenditures.”
In April, the projected surplus by fiscal 2023 was raised to $6.4 billion and then to $6.7 billion. Audited results for fiscal 2015 were released in the final months of this reporting period; audited results for fiscal years 2016 and 2017 have yet to be released.
Among the ongoing issues are debt-service obligations, pensions, Law 80 (the repeal of which would allow at-will employment), and Christmas bonuses for public sector employees.
In the latter half of this reporting period, the chairman of the U.S. House committee that oversees Puerto Rico sent the governor a letter that recommended the takeover of the Commonwealth’s government by the oversight board and an increased focus on bondholder concerns. The governor fired back, calling the chairman’s letter “truly disturbing in its reckless disregard for collaboration and cooperation.”
On June 30, 2018, the oversight board certified a budget for Puerto Rico, allocating $8.76 billion for the general fund and $20.7 billion for the consolidated budget. The next month, both the governor and legislative leaders filed lawsuits claiming that the oversight board was overstepping its authority. These suits followed the board’s rejection of the budget that the Legislature had passed. The oversight board cited the
|
8 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
PROMESA provisions that allow it to impose its own budget if the government does not submit a compliant budget; government officials, meanwhile, argue that the board is trying to set public policy.
Clearly, the situation remains dynamic. All issuers can be affected positively or adversely by economic and fiscal conditions: were the economic situation in Puerto Rico to worsen, for example, then the performance of Rochester municipal funds that hold Puerto Rican debt, including this Fund, may be adversely affected. Our team continues to believe that the best interests of all stakeholders can be met through negotiated settlements that offer Puerto Rico a path forward, strengthen its economy and improve the quality of life of its residents while providing investors with an appropriate return.
FUND PERFORMANCE
Oppenheimer Rochester New Jersey Municipal Fund held more than 150 securities as of July 31, 2018. The Fund was invested in a broad range of sectors, providing shareholders with a diversity of holdings that we believe would be difficult and costly to replicate in an individual portfolio.
During this reporting period, a rally in U.S. equities and persistent low interest rates put pressure on the dividends of many fixed income investments. This Fund’s Class A dividend, which was 2.8 cents per share at the outset of this reporting period, was
reduced to 2.6 cents per share beginning with the September 2017 payout, to 2.4 cents per share beginning with the December 2017 payout, and again to 2.1 cents per share beginning with the March 2018 payout. In all, the Fund distributed 28.3 cents per Class A share this reporting period. Shareholders should note that market conditions during this reporting period did not affect the Fund’s overall investment goals or cause it to pay any capital gain distributions.
Six of the Fund’s 10 largest sectors were among the 10 strongest sectors this reporting period. The Fund’s performance this reporting period was primarily driven by its holdings of sales tax revenue. Debt-service payments on securities in this sector, almost all of which were issued in Puerto Rico, are paid using the issuing municipality’s sales tax revenue. Securities in tobacco bonds were the second strongest performer this reporting period. These high-yielding bonds, which are backed by proceeds from the landmark 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), were also the Fund’s largest sector as of July 31, 2018. The Fund’s second, fourth, sixth, and ninth-largest sectors (government appropriations, transportation infrastructure, marine/aviation facilities, and casino, respectively) were also ranked among the 10 best-performing sectors.
Research-based security selection continued to be a factor in the strong performance of these sectors. Securities in the marine/aviation facilities sector, the Fund’s third strongest contributor to performance, are typically
|
9 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
high-grade investments backed by valuable collateral.
The government appropriation sector, which included one bond issued in Puerto Rico, was the fourth strongest performer this reporting period. The municipal issuer of this type of security agrees to include an allocation in its budget that will be used to make its debt payments. Because municipalities need reliable access to future capital, these appropriations tend to be off limits during budget negotiations. The transportation infrastructure sector was the fifth strongest performer this reporting period; this type of financing supports the construction of critical projects such as rail, bridges, ports, and public buildings. The casino sector was the third strongest performer as of January 31, 2018. The Fund’s holdings in this sector are secured by specific tax revenue streams that have traditionally easily exceeded the debt-service obligations and have been isolated from financial difficulties in the industry.
Three sectors detracted slightly from the Fund’s performance this reporting period, though in aggregate performance was reduced less than 1.5 percentage points by the underperforming sectors. The detractors as of July 31, 2018, include the G.O. sector, the Fund’s eighth largest, as well as municipal leases and sewer utilities. These sectors were
adversely affected by developments in Puerto Rico, as discussed above.
The Fund’s investments in securities issued in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are exempt from federal, state, and local income taxes, and the Fund’s holdings as of July 31, 2018 included securities from many different sectors. Investors should note that some of this Fund’s investments in securities issued in Puerto Rico are insured. A complete listing of securities held by this Fund can be found in this report’s Statement of Investments.
INVESTMENT STRATEGY
The Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Management Team focuses exclusively on municipal bonds, and this Fund invests primarily in investment-grade municipal securities. It may invest up to 25% of its total assets in below-investment grade securities, or “junk” bonds; the percentage of assets is measured at the time of purchase as is the credit quality of the securities. Additionally, the credit quality is based on Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”) ratings or, if no NRSRO rating, on internal ratings.
In closing, we believe that the structure and sector composition of this Fund and the use of time-tested strategies will continue to
|
10 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
benefit fixed income investors through interest rate and economic cycles.
| | |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g540871dsp11a.jpg) | | ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g540871dsp11b.jpg)
Elizabeth Mossow, CFA Senior Portfolio Manager |
Elizabeth Mossow has been named portfolio manager of the Fund. With support as needed from the Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Management Team, Elizabeth will continue to adhere to a consistent investment approach based on the belief that tax-free yield can help investors achieve their long-term financial objectives even when market conditions fluctuate. The Fund will not be managed based on predictions of interest rate changes. Further details about the Rochester team’s investment approach can be found on our landing page, oppenheimerfunds. com/rochesterway.
|
11 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
Top Holdings and Allocations
TOP TEN CATEGORIES
| | | | |
Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement | | | 13.0 | % |
Government Appropriation | | | 9.5 | |
Sales Tax Revenue | | | 9.0 | |
Transportation Infrastructure | | | 8.8 | |
Higher Education | | | 8.4 | |
Marine/Aviation Facilities | | | 7.5 | |
Hospital/Healthcare | | | 6.4 | |
General Obligation | | | 6.1 | |
Casino | | | 4.5 | |
Water Utilities | | | 3.8 | |
Portfolio holdings are subject to change. Percentages are as of July 31, 2018 and are based on total assets.
CREDIT ALLOCATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | NRSRO- Rated | | Sub- Adviser- Rated | | Total |
AAA | | | | 0.7 | % | | | | 0.0 | % | | | | 0.7 | % |
AA | | | | 15.8 | | | | | 0.0 | | | | | 15.8 | |
A | | | | 23.5 | | | | | 0.0 | | | | | 23.5 | |
BBB | | | | 35.7 | | | | | 0.6 | | | | | 36.3 | |
BB or lower | | | | 23.1 | | | | | 0.6 | | | | | 23.7 | |
Total | | | | 98.8 | % | | | | 1.2 | % | | | | 100.0 | % |
The percentages above are based on the market value of the securities as of July 31, 2018 and are subject to change. OppenheimerFunds, Inc. determines the credit allocation of the Fund’s assets using ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs), such as S&P Global Ratings (S&P). For any security rated by an NRSRO other than S&P, the sub-adviser, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., converts that security’s rating to the equivalent S&P rating. If two or more NRSROs have assigned a rating to a security, the highest rating is used. For securities not rated by an NRSRO, the sub-adviser uses its own credit analysis to assign ratings in categories similar to those of S&P. The use of similar categories is not an indication that the sub-adviser’s credit analysis process is consistent or comparable with any NRSRO’s process were that NRSRO to rate the same security.
For the purposes of this Credit Allocation table, securities rated within the NRSROs’ four highest categories—AAA, AA, A, and BBB—are investment-grade securities. For further details, please consult the Fund’s prospectus or Statement of Additional Information.
|
12 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
Performance
DISTRIBUTION YIELDS
As of 7/31/18
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | With Sales Charge |
Class A | | | | 2.76 | % | | | | 2.63 | % |
Class C | | | | 2.15 | | | | | N/A | |
Class Y | | | | 2.96 | | | | | N/A | |
STANDARDIZED YIELDS
| | | | | | |
For the 30 Days Ended 7/31/18 |
Class A | | | 1.47 | % | | |
Class C | | | 0.90 | | | |
Class Y | | | 1.77 | | | |
TAXABLE EQUIVALENT YIELDS
| | | | | | |
As of 7/31/18 |
Class A | | | 2.75 | % | | |
Class C | | | 1.68 | | | |
Class Y | | | 3.31 | | | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITHOUT SALES CHARGE AS OF 7/31/18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Inception Date | | | 1-Year | | | 5-Year | | | 10-Year | | | Since Inception | |
Class A (ONJAX) | | | 3/1/94 | | | | 5.22 | % | | | 3.81 | % | | | 4.56 | % | | | 4.49 | % |
Class C (ONJCX) | | | 8/29/95 | | | | 4.41 | | | | 3.06 | | | | 3.78 | | | | 3.80 | |
Class Y (ONJYX) | | | 11/29/10 | | | | 5.35 | | | | 4.01 | | | | N/A | | | | 4.35 | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITH SALES CHARGE AS OF 7/31/18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Inception Date | | | 1-Year | | | 5-Year | | | 10-Year | | | Since Inception | |
Class A (ONJAX) | | | 3/1/94 | | | | 0.22 | % | | | 2.81 | % | | | 4.06 | % | | | 4.29 | % |
Class C (ONJCX) | | | 8/29/95 | | | | 3.41 | | | | 3.06 | | | | 3.78 | | | | 3.80 | |
Class Y (ONJYX) | | | 11/29/10 | | | | 5.35 | | | | 4.01 | | | | N/A | | | | 4.35 | |
|
13 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
COMPARISON OF CHANGE IN VALUE OF $10,000 HYPOTHETICAL INVESTMENTS IN:
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g540871dsp14.jpg)
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investments. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800. CALL OPP (225.5677). Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and the applicable sales charge: for Class A shares, the current maximum initial sales charge of 4.75%; for Class C, the contingent deferred sales charge of 1% for the 1-year period. There is no sales charge for Class Y shares.
The Fund’s performance is compared to the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, an index of a broad range of investment-grade municipal bonds that measures the performance of the general municipal bond market. The Fund’s performance is also compared to the Consumer Price Index, a non-securities index that measures changes in the inflation rate. Indices are unmanaged and cannot be purchased by investors. While index comparisons may be useful to provide a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, it must be noted that the Fund’s investments are not limited to the investments comprising the index. Index performance includes reinvestment of income, but does not reflect transaction costs, fees, expenses, or taxes. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only as a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, and does not predict or depict performance of the Fund. The Fund’s performance reflects the effects of the Fund’s business and operating expenses.
Distribution yields for Class A shares are based on dividends of $0.021 for the 28-day accrual period ended July 24, 2018. The yield without sales charge for Class A shares is calculated by dividing annualized dividends by the Class A net asset value (NAV) on July 24, 2018; for the yield with charge, the denominator is the Class A maximum offering price on that date. Distribution yields for Class C and Y are annualized based on dividends of $0.0164 and $0.0226, respectively, for the 28-day accrual period ended July 24, 2018 and on the corresponding net asset values on that date.
|
14 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
Standardized yield is based on an SEC-standardized formula designed to approximate the Fund’s annualized hypothetical current income from securities less expenses for the 30-day period ended July 31, 2018 and that date’s maximum offering price (for Class A shares) or net asset value (for all other share classes). Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields.
Taxable equivalent yield is based on the standardized yield and the 2018 top federal and New Jersey tax rate of 46.45%. Calculations factor in the 3.8% tax on unearned income under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as applicable. A portion of the Fund’s distributions may be subject to tax; distributions may also increase an investor’s exposure to the alternative minimum tax. Capital gains distributions are taxable as capital gains. Tax treatments of the Fund’s distributions and capital gains may vary by state; investors should consult a tax advisor to determine if the Fund is appropriate for them. Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields. This Report must be preceded or accompanied by a Fund prospectus.
Investments in “tobacco bonds,” which are backed by the proceeds a state or territory receives from the 1998 national litigation settlement with tobacco manufacturers, may be vulnerable to economic and/or legislative events that affect issuers in a particular municipal market sector. Annual payments by MSA-participating manufacturers, for example, hinge on many factors, including annual domestic cigarette shipments, inflation and the relative market share of non-participating manufacturers. To date, we believe consumption figures remain within an acceptable range of the assumptions used to structure MSA bonds. Future MSA payments could be reduced if consumption were to fall more rapidly than originally forecast.
The ICE BofA Merrill Lynch AAA Municipal Securities index is the AAA subset of the ICE BofA Merrill Lynch US Municipal Securities Index, which tracks the performance of dollar-denominated, investment-grade, tax-exempt debt issued by U.S. states and territories and their political subdivisions; index constituents are weighted based on capitalization, and accrued interest is calculated assuming next-day settlement.
The views in the Fund Performance Discussion represent the opinions of this Fund’s portfolio managers and are not intended as investment advice or to predict or depict the performance of any investment. These views are as of the close of business on July 31, 2018, and are subject to change based on subsequent developments. The Fund’s portfolio and strategies are subject to change.
Before investing in any of the Oppenheimer funds, investors should carefully consider a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses contain this and other information about the funds, and may be obtained by asking your financial advisor, visiting oppenheimerfunds.com, or calling 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). Read prospectuses and summary prospectuses carefully before investing.
Shares of Oppenheimer funds are not deposits or obligations of any bank, are not guaranteed by any bank, are not insured by the FDIC or any other agency, and involve investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested.
|
15 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
Fund Expenses
Fund Expenses. As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, which may include sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and/or contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service fees; and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples are based on an investment of $1,000.00 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire 6-month period ended July 31, 2018.
Actual Expenses. The first section of the table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section for the class of shares you hold, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expense that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000.00 (for example, an $8,600.00 account value divided by $1,000.00 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended July 31, 2018” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes. The second section of the table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio for each class of shares, and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year for each class before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example for the class of shares you hold with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as front-end or contingent deferred sales charges (loads). Therefore, the “hypothetical” section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
16 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | |
Actual | | Beginning Account Value February 1, 2018 | | Ending Account Value July 31, 2018 | | Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended July 31, 2018 | | |
Class A | | $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,109.70 | | $ 6.77 | | |
Class C | | 1,000.00 | | 1,106.00 | | 10.23 | | |
Class Y | | 1,000.00 | | 1,110.80 | | 5.56 | | |
| | | |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | | | | | | |
Class A | | 1,000.00 | | 1,018.40 | | 6.48 | | |
Class C | | 1,000.00 | | 1,015.12 | | 9.79 | | |
Class Y | | 1,000.00 | | 1,019.54 | | 5.32 | | |
Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for that class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Those annualized expense ratios, excluding indirect expenses from affiliated funds, based on the 6-month period ended July 31, 2018 are as follows:
| | | | |
Class | | Expense Ratios | |
Class A | | | 1.29 | % |
Class C | | | 1.95 | |
Class Y | | | 1.06 | |
|
17 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS July 31, 2018
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
| Municipal Bonds and Notes—109.8% | | | | | |
| New Jersey—77.0% | | | | | |
| | | | $1,000,000 | | Atlantic City, NJ GO1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 03/01/2037 | | | $ | 1,105,640 | |
| | | | 1,250,000 | | Atlantic City, NJ GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2042 | | | | 1,375,250 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | Atlantic County, NJ Improvement Authority (Stockton University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2034 | | | | 1,124,940 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | Camden County, NJ Improvement Authority (Cooper Health System)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2033 | | | | 1,073,320 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | Camden County, NJ Improvement Authority (Cooper Health System)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2034 | | | | 1,071,250 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | Camden County, NJ Improvement Authority (Cooper Health System)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2035 | | | | 1,069,170 | |
| | | | 2,000,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 2,163,440 | |
| | | | 1,665,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2024 | | | | 1,669,978 | |
| | | | 3,000,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 3,220,740 | |
| | | | 3,000,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2044 | | | | 3,215,580 | |
| | | | 420,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ (Hotel Room Fee)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2025 | | | | 421,100 | |
| | | | 760,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ (Hotel Room Fee)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2022 | | | | 765,366 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | Casino Reinvestment Devel. Authority of NJ (Luxury Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2028 | | | | 1,093,440 | |
| | | | 130,000 | | Essex County, NJ Improvement Authority (Newark)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 04/01/2029 | | | | 130,451 | |
| | | | 250,000 | | Essex County, NJ Improvement Authority (Newark)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 11/01/2030 | | | | 261,845 | |
| | | | 140,000 | | Garden State Preservation Trust, NJ Open Space & Farmland Preservation | | | 3.565 | 2 | | | 11/01/2026 | | | | 109,249 | |
| | | | 310,000 | | Garden State Preservation Trust, NJ Open Space & Farmland Preservation1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/01/2028 | | | | 366,098 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | Hudson County, NJ Improvement Authority1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 01/01/2040 | | | | 1,057,780 | |
| | | | 2,655,000 | | Hudson County, NJ Improvement Authority (Lincoln Park Golf Course)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/01/2041 | | | | 2,892,543 | |
| | | | 20,000 | | Middlesex County, NJ Improvement Authority (South Plainfield Urban Renewal)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/01/2030 | | | | 20,064 | |
| | | | 5,000 | | Neptune City, NJ Hsg. Authority1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 04/01/2019 | | | | 5,012 | |
| | | | 445,000 | | New Brunswick, NJ Parking Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2027 | | | | 488,436 | |
| | | | 605,000 | | New Brunswick, NJ Parking Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2029 | | | | 663,068 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | New Brunswick, NJ Parking Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2042 | | | | 1,142,540 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | New Brunswick, NJ Parking Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2047 | | | | 1,140,000 | |
| | | | 430,000 | | Newark, NJ GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2029 | | | | 450,545 | |
| | | | 3,000,000 | | Newark, NJ GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2029 | | | | 3,152,580 | |
| | | | 410,000 | | Newark, NJ Hsg. Authority (Port Newark Marine Terminal Rental)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 471,102 | |
| | | | 2,000,000 | | Newark, NJ Hsg. Authority (Secured Police Facility)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 2,230,360 | |
| | | | 600,000 | | NJ Building Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2028 | | | | 678,150 | |
| | | | 300,000 | | NJ Building Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2029 | | | | 338,184 | |
| | | | 2,095,000 | | NJ EDA1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2028 | | | | 2,224,094 | |
| | | | 750,000 | | NJ EDA1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2029 | | | | 794,535 | |
|
18 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
| New Jersey (Continued) | | | | | |
| | | | $3,000,000 | | NJ EDA1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 06/15/2035 | | | $ | 3,225,120 | |
| | | | 3,000,000 | | NJ EDA1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2036 | | | | 3,213,870 | |
| | | | 3,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Continental Airlines)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 11/15/2030 | | | | 3,398,100 | |
| | | | 3,100,000 | | NJ EDA (Cranes Mill)1 | | | 5.100 | | | | 06/01/2027 | | | | 3,103,720 | |
| | | | 70,000 | | NJ EDA (Dept. of Human Services)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 70,213 | |
| | | | 350,000 | | NJ EDA (Foundation Academy Charter School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 376,365 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Foundation Academy Charter School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2050 | | | | 1,065,650 | |
| | | | 2,820,000 | | NJ EDA (Harrogate)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 12/01/2026 | | | | 2,819,718 | |
| | | | 90,000 | | NJ EDA (Metromall Urban Renewal)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 04/01/2031 | | | | 87,461 | |
| | | | 3,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Motor Vehicle Surcharges)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 3,361,470 | |
| | | | 160,000 | | NJ EDA (Municipal Rehabilitation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2028 | | | | 160,402 | |
| | | | 5,320,000 | | NJ EDA (New Jersey American Water Company)1 | | | 5.600 | | | | 11/01/2034 | | | | 5,602,811 | |
| | | | 4,350,000 | | NJ EDA (New Jersey American Water Company)1 | | | 5.700 | | | | 10/01/2039 | | | | 4,516,692 | |
| | | | 735,000 | | NJ EDA (Newark Downtown District Management Corp.)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/15/2027 | | | | 735,456 | |
| | | | 1,400,000 | | NJ EDA (Newark Downtown District Management Corp.)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 1,400,714 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | NJ EDA (North Star Academy Charter School of Newark)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2047 | | | | 1,073,820 | |
| | | | 500,000 | | NJ EDA (Provident Group-Kean Properties)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 542,100 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Provident Group-Montclair Properties)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2042 | | | | 1,104,260 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | NJ EDA (School Facilities)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 09/01/2026 | | | | 1,054,170 | |
| | | | 65,000 | | NJ EDA (St. Barnabas Medical Center) | | | 6.827 | 2 | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 61,267 | |
| | | | 25,000 | | NJ EDA (St. Barnabas Medical Center) | | | 7.147 | 2 | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 24,116 | |
| | | | 3,000,000 | | NJ EDA (State Government Buildings)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2047 | | | | 3,237,240 | |
| | | | 20,000 | | NJ EDA (State Office Buildings)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2020 | | | | 20,052 | |
| | | | 3,200,000 | | NJ EDA (Team Academy Charter School)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2043 | | | | 3,514,496 | |
| | | | 10,650,000 | | NJ EDA (The Goethals Bridge Replacement)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 01/01/2043 | | | | 11,659,726 | |
| | | | 1,500,000 | | NJ EDA (UMM Energy Partners)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 1,552,665 | |
| | | | 1,250,000 | | NJ EDA (UMM Energy Partners)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/15/2043 | | | | 1,295,812 | |
| | | | 125,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Drew University)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 129,272 | |
| | | | 1,590,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Georgian Court University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 1,702,015 | |
| | | | 1,485,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Georgian Court University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,579,342 | |
| | | | 1,640,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Georgian Court University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 1,740,417 | |
| | | | 5,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Public Library)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2022 | | | | 5,015 | |
| | | | 185,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Rider University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 201,939 | |
| | | | 300,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Rider University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 326,523 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Rider University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,033,330 | |
| | | | 3,250,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Rider University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 3,494,075 | |
|
19 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
| New Jersey (Continued) | | | | | |
| | | | $2,025,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Stockton University)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 07/01/2041 | | | $ | 2,186,798 | |
| | | | 2,000,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (William Patterson University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 2,237,720 | |
| | | | 5,000,000 | | NJ GO3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2027 | | | | 5,778,744 | |
| | | | 5,000,000 | | NJ GO3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2028 | | | | 5,707,844 | |
| | | | 3,000,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (Barnabas Health)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2044 | | | | 3,273,570 | |
| | | | 5,085,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (Catholic Health East)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2033 | | | | 5,437,085 | |
| | | | 2,000,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (Hospital Asset Transformation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 2,173,940 | |
| | | | 230,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (Hospital Asset Transformation)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 231,486 | |
| | | | 65,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (Hospital Asset Transformation)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 65,420 | |
| | | | 500,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (SJHS/SJH&MC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 537,830 | |
| | | | 1,960,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (St. Luke’s Warren Hospital)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2034 | | | | 2,120,034 | |
| | | | 2,000,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (University Hospital)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 2,195,640 | |
| | | | 125,000 | | NJ Health Care Facilities Financing Authority (Virtua Health/Virtua Memorial Hospital Burlington County Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 129,814 | |
| | | | 1,590,000 | | NJ Higher Education Student Assistance Authority (Student Loans)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2025 | | | | 1,701,984 | |
| | | | 45,000 | | NJ Higher Education Student Assistance Authority (Student Loans)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 48,082 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | NJ Hsg. & Mtg. Finance Agency (Single Family Hsg.)1 | | | 3.800 | | | | 10/01/2032 | | | | 997,790 | |
| | | | 2,000,000 | | NJ Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2037 | | | | 2,233,520 | |
| | | | 4,400,000 | | NJ Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 4,724,896 | |
| | | | 6,350,000 | | NJ Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 7,126,796 | |
| | | | 50,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/15/2025 | | | | 50,110 | |
| | | | 2,740,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2030 | | | | 3,046,359 | |
| | | | 2,800,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2031 | | | | 3,100,832 | |
| | | | 1,625,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2038 | | | | 1,692,698 | |
| | | | 5,000,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/15/2041 | | | | 5,231,550 | |
| | | | 4,518,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/15/2035 | | | | 4,920,328 | |
| | | | 850,000 | | NJ Turnpike Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2040 | | | | 969,782 | |
| | | | 20,000 | | Passaic County, NJ Improvement Authority (Paterson Parking Deck)1 | | | 4.100 | | | | 04/15/2019 | | | | 20,023 | |
| | | | 6,330,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2029 | | | | 7,056,231 | |
| | | | 5,380,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2030 | | | | 5,985,021 | |
| | | | 4,000,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 4,432,410 | |
| | | | 1,350,000 | | South Jersey, NJ Port Corp. (Marine Terminal)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2039 | | | | 1,459,202 | |
| | | | 3,650,000 | | South Jersey, NJ Transportation Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 3,963,170 | |
|
20 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
| New Jersey (Continued) | | | | | |
| | | | $55,000 | | Union County, NJ Improvement Authority (Linden Airport)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 03/01/2028 | | | $ | 55,148 | |
| | | | 40,000 | | West Milford Township, NJ (Municipal Utilities Authority)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 08/01/2031 | | | | 40,132 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 197,407,253 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| New York—7.6% | | | | | |
| | | | 2,689,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (JFK International Air Terminal)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2022 | | | | 2,806,724 | |
| | | | 8,710,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (JFK International Air Terminal)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2025 | | | | 9,091,585 | |
| | | | 5,100,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (JFK International Air Terminal)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2028 | | | | 5,359,029 | |
| | | | 1,305,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (KIAC)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 10/01/2019 | | | | 1,365,213 | |
| | | | 850,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 206th Series1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2037 | | | | 960,373 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 19,582,924 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Possessions—25.2% | | | | | |
| | | | 10,000 | | Guam Hsg. Corp. (Single Family Mtg.)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 09/01/2031 | | | | 10,128 | |
| | | | 125,000 | | Guam Power Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2024 | | | | 136,814 | |
| | | | 250,000 | | Guam Power Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2030 | | | | 267,502 | |
| | | | 1,965,000 | | Northern Mariana Islands Ports Authority, Series A | | | 6.250 | | | | 03/15/2028 | | | | 1,852,012 | |
| | | | 19,195,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 05/15/2043 | | | | 19,362,956 | |
| | | | 2,150,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 903,000 | |
| | | | 5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 2,087,500 | |
| | | | 3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO4 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 1,252,500 | |
| | | | 168,097 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 105,481 | |
| | | | 168,096 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 105,480 | |
| | | | 165,099 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | 01/01/2021 | | | | 103,600 | |
| | | | 165,099 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 103,600 | |
| | | | 55,033 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | 01/01/2022 | | | | 34,533 | |
| | | | 55,033 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority4 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 34,533 | |
| | | | 1,700,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 1,041,250 | |
| | | | 45,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A4 | | | 5.050 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 27,563 | |
| | | | 3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A4 | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2043 | | | | 1,882,500 | |
| | | | 5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 3,062,500 | |
| | | | 550,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 336,875 | |
| | | | 50,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 30,625 | |
| | | | 90,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 55,125 | |
| | | | 45,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series SS, NPFGC | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 45,378 | |
| | | | 100,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 61,250 | |
| | | | 80,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 49,000 | |
| | | | 750,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, FGIC5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 600,000 | |
| | | | 575,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 60,375 | |
| | | | 4,750,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 498,750 | |
| | | | 2,610,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure6 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 274,050 | |
|
21 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
| U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | |
| | | | $975,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure, AMBAC | | | 6.995 | %2 | | | 07/01/2035 | | | $ | 387,475 | |
| | | | 3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure, FGIC5 | | | 7.046 | 2 | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 651,690 | |
| | | | 400,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure (Mepsi Campus)4 | | | 6.500 | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 81,000 | |
| | | | 930,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2036 | | | | 830,025 | |
| | | | 100,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.125 | | | | 04/01/2032 | | | | 92,000 | |
| | | | 100,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2042 | | | | 90,000 | |
| | | | 175,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Cogeneration Facilities) | | | 6.625 | | | | 06/01/2026 | | | | 166,688 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Polytechnic University), ACA1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2032 | | | | 982,770 | |
| | | | 2,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Municipal Finance Agency, Series A, AGC1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2020 | | | | 2,053,260 | |
| | | | 305,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 123,144 | |
| | | | 5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority6 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 1,968,750 | |
| | | | 1,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, NPFGC1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 1,032,760 | |
| | | | 5,235,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., Series B4 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/01/2026 | | | | 143,963 | |
| | | | 2,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2021 | | | | 1,025,000 | |
| | | | 4,850,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2022 | | | | 1,988,500 | |
| | | | 4,925,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 2,019,250 | |
| | | | 16,675,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A, NPFGC | | | 5.807 | 2 | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 4,951,641 | |
| | | | 325,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 6.375 | | | | 08/01/2039 | | | | 133,250 | |
| | | | 6,800,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A4 | | | 6.500 | | | | 08/01/2044 | | | | 2,788,000 | |
| | | | 9,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/01/2057 | | | | 7,537,500 | |
| | | | 1,100,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 6.497 | 2 | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 319,627 | |
| | | | 3,100,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 7.622 | 2 | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 816,230 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 64,567,403 | |
| Total Investments, at Value (Cost $305,740,459)—109.8% | | | | 281,557,580 | |
| Net Other Assets (Liabilities)—(9.8) | | | | | | | | | | | (25,244,325 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Assets—100.0% | | | | | | | | | | $ | 256,313,255 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Footnotes to Statement of Investments
1. All or a portion of the security position has been segregated for collateral to cover borrowings. See Note 9 of the accompanying Notes.
2. Zero coupon bond reflects effective yield on the original acquisition date.
3. Security represents the underlying municipal bond with respect to an inverse floating rate security held by the Fund. The bond was purchased by the Fund and subsequently transferred to a trust, which issued the related inverse floating rate security. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
4. This security is not accruing income because its issuer has missed or is expected to miss interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
5. The issuer of this security has missed or is expected to miss interest and/or principal payments on this security. The security is insured and is accruing partial income at a rate anticipated to be recovered through the insurer. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate.
6. This security is accruing partial income at an anticipated effective rate based on expected interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate.
|
22 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below:
| | |
ACA | | American Capital Access |
AGC | | Assured Guaranty Corp. |
AMBAC | | AMBAC Indemnity Corp. |
EDA | | Economic Devel. Authority |
FGIC | | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
GO | | General Obligation |
ITEMECF | | Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Community Facilities |
JFK | | John Fitzgerald Kennedy |
NPFGC | | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
NY/NJ | | New York/New Jersey |
SJH&MC | | St. Joseph’s Health and Medical Center |
SJHS | | St. Joseph Health System |
TASC | | Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds |
V.I. | | United States Virgin Islands |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
23 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES July 31, 2018
| | | | |
| |
Assets | | | | |
Investments, at value (cost $305,740,459) — see accompanying statement of investments | | $ | 281,557,580 | |
| |
Cash | | | 227,210 | |
| |
Receivables and other assets: | | | | |
Interest | | | 2,206,680 | |
Investments sold on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis | | | 2,079,742 | |
Shares of beneficial interest sold | | | 159,876 | |
Other | | | 136,222 | |
| | | | |
Total assets | | | 286,367,310 | |
| | | | |
| |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payables and other liabilities: | | | | |
Payable for short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | | 19,280,000 | |
Payable for borrowings (See Note 9) | | | 9,600,000 | |
Shares of beneficial interest redeemed | | | 895,246 | |
Dividends | | | 109,471 | |
Trustees’ compensation | | | 66,620 | |
Distribution and service plan fees | | | 43,780 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 6,150 | |
Interest expense on borrowings | | | 4,181 | |
Other | | | 48,607 | |
| | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 30,054,055 | |
| | | | |
| |
Net Assets | | $ | 256,313,255 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
Composition of Net Assets | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | $ | 415,533,548 | |
| |
Accumulated net investment income | | | 1,639,193 | |
| |
Accumulated net realized loss on investments | | | (136,676,607) | |
| |
Net unrealized depreciation on investments | | | (24,182,879) | |
| | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 256,313,255 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | |
| |
Net asset value and redemption price per share (based on net assets of $162,954,996 and 17,732,158 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $9.19 | |
| |
Maximum offering price per share (net asset value plus sales charge of 4.75% of offering price) | | | $9.65 | |
| |
| |
Class C Shares: | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, redemption price (excludes applicable contingent deferred sales charge) and offering price per share (based on net assets of $71,387,917 and 7,758,043 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $9.20 | |
| |
| |
Class Y Shares: | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, redemption price and offering price per share (based on net assets of $21,970,342 and 2,387,861 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $9.20 | |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
24 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS For the Year Ended July 31, 2018
| | | | |
| |
Investment Income | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 12,931,444 | |
| |
Expenses | | | | |
Management fees | | | 1,623,322 | |
| |
Distribution and service plan fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 416,189 | |
Class B1 | | | 6,994 | |
Class C | | | 717,803 | |
| |
Transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 170,964 | |
Class B1 | | | 777 | |
Class C | | | 79,794 | |
Class Y | | | 26,093 | |
| |
Shareholder communications: | | | | |
Class A | | | 13,928 | |
Class B1 | | | 302 | |
Class C | | | 7,486 | |
Class Y | | | 3,199 | |
| |
Borrowing fees | | | 377,335 | |
| |
Legal, auditing and other professional fees | | | 359,619 | |
| |
Interest expense on borrowings | | | 138,780 | |
| |
Interest expense and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | | 112,037 | |
| |
Trustees’ compensation | | | 3,710 | |
| |
Custodian fees and expenses | | | 2,795 | |
| |
Other | | | 11,342 | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 4,072,469 | |
| |
Net Investment Income | | | 8,858,975 | |
| |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | | |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | (17,751,789) | |
| |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investment transactions | | | 17,551,210 | |
| |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | | $ | 8,658,396 | |
| | | | |
1. Effective June 1, 2018, all Class B shares converted to Class A shares.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
25 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | |
| |
Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 8,858,975 | | | $ | 14,549,519 | |
| |
Net realized gain (loss) | | | (17,751,789) | | | | 762,842 | |
| |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 17,551,210 | | | | (27,232,735) | |
| | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | | | 8,658,396 | | | | (11,920,374) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Dividends and/or Distributions to Shareholders | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (5,547,022) | | | | (9,969,457) | |
Class B1 | | | (20,939) | | | | (77,318) | |
Class C | | | (2,065,669) | | | | (4,031,761) | |
Class Y | | | (914,187) | | | | (1,454,078) | |
| | | | |
| | | (8,547,817) | | | | (15,532,614) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from beneficial interest transactions: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (45,576,678) | | | | (32,878,334) | |
Class B1 | | | (1,609,917) | | | | (1,052,793) | |
Class C | | | (26,229,722) | | | | (18,824,104) | |
Class Y | | | (14,241,261) | | | | 10,270,816 | |
| | | | |
| | | (87,657,578) | | | | (42,484,415) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
Total decrease | | | (87,546,999) | | | | (69,937,403) | |
| |
Beginning of period | | | 343,860,254 | | | | 413,797,657 | |
| | | | |
End of period (including accumulated net investment income of $1,639,193 and $540,374, respectively) | | $ | 256,313,255 | | | $ | 343,860,254 | |
| | | | |
1. Effective June 1, 2018 all Class B shares converted to Class A Shares.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
26 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS For the Year Ended July 31, 2018
| | | | |
| |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 8,658,396 | |
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Purchase of investment securities | | | (68,359,752) | |
Proceeds from disposition of investment securities | | | 168,338,432 | |
Short-term investment securities, net | | | (4,740,676) | |
Premium amortization | | | 1,353,902 | |
Discount accretion | | | (1,260,547) | |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | 17,751,789 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investment transactions | | | (17,551,210) | |
Change in assets: | | | | |
Increase in other assets | | | (7,829) | |
Decrease in interest receivable | | | 672,799 | |
Decrease in receivable for securities sold | | | 2,323,468 | |
Change in liabilities: | | | | |
Decrease in other liabilities | | | (64,598) | |
Decrease in payable for securities purchased | | | (1,165,990) | |
| | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 105,948,184 | |
| | | | |
| |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | |
Proceeds from borrowings | | | 128,700,000 | |
Payments on borrowings | | | (138,700,000) | |
Payments/proceeds on short-term floating rate notes issued | | | 405,000 | |
Proceeds from shares sold | | | 21,504,571 | |
Payments on shares redeemed | | | (117,023,068) | |
Cash distributions paid | | | (1,159,809) | |
| | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (106,273,306) | |
| |
Net decrease in cash | | | (325,122) | |
| |
Cash, beginning balance | | | 552,332 | |
| | | | |
Cash, ending balance | | $ | 227,210 | |
| | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of reinvestment of dividends and distributions of $7,498,899.
Cash paid for interest on borrowings—$151,852.
Cash paid for interest on short-term floating rate notes issued—$112,037.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
27 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 |
|
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $9.02 | | | | $9.70 | | | | $9.34 | | | | $9.67 | | | $9.60 |
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.29 | | | | 0.38 | | | | 0.43 | | | | 0.48 | | | 0.52 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.16 | | | | (0.66) | | | | 0.40 | | | | (0.31) | | | 0.07 |
| | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.45 | | | | (0.28) | | | | 0.83 | | | | 0.17 | | | 0.59 |
|
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.28) | | | | (0.40) | | | | (0.47) | | | | (0.50) | | | (0.52) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | | $9.19 | | | | $9.02 | | | | $9.70 | | | | $9.34 | | | $9.67 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 5.22% | | | | (3.01)% | | | | 9.25% | | | | 1.64% | | | 6.40% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $162,955 | | | | $207,958 | | | | $257,608 | | | | $263,873 | | | $306,172 |
|
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $170,793 | | | | $231,289 | | | | $260,521 | | | | $301,779 | | | $326,496 |
|
Ratios to average net assets3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.36% | | | | 4.05% | | | | 4.55% | | | | 4.89% | | | 5.58% |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 1.07% | | | | 0.90% | | | | 0.87% | | | | 0.87% | | | 0.83% |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.19% | | | | 0.13% | | | | 0.22% | | | | 0.23% | | | 0.15% |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.07% | | | 0.08% |
| | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.30% | | | | 1.09% | | | | 1.13% | | | | 1.17% | | | 1.06% |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.30% | | | | 1.09% | | | | 1.13% | | | | 1.17% | | | 1.06%5 |
|
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 23% | | | | 9% | | | | 11% | | | | 7% | | | 30% |
|
28 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
29 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 | |
| |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $9.04 | | | | $9.71 | | | | $9.35 | | | | $9.68 | | | | $9.61 | |
| |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.24 | | | | 0.31 | | | | 0.36 | | | | 0.40 | | | | 0.45 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.15 | | | | (0.64) | | | | 0.40 | | | | (0.30) | | | | 0.06 | |
| | | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.39 | | | | (0.33) | | | | 0.76 | | | | 0.10 | | | | 0.51 | |
| |
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.23) | | | | (0.34) | | | | (0.40) | | | | (0.43) | | | | (0.44) | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $9.20 | | | | $9.04 | | | | $9.71 | | | | $9.35 | | | | $9.68 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 4.41% | | | | (3.70)% | | | | 8.54% | | | | 0.87% | | | | 5.60% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $71,388 | | | | $97,517 | | | | $124,488 | | | | $131,468 | | | | $142,154 | |
| |
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $79,705 | | | | $112,466 | | | | $125,656 | | | | $142,243 | | | | $150,721 | |
| |
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 2.70% | | | | 3.36% | | | | 3.80% | | | | 4.06% | | | | 4.83% | |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 1.73% | | | | 1.62% | | | | 1.61% | | | | 1.62% | | | | 1.59% | |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.19% | | | | 0.13% | | | | 0.22% | | | | 0.23% | | | | 0.15% | |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.07% | | | | 0.08% | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.96% | | | | 1.81% | | | | 1.87% | | | | 1.92% | | | | 1.82% | |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.96% | | | | 1.81% | | | | 1.87% | | | | 1.92% | | | | 1.82%5 | |
| |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 23% | | | | 9% | | | | 11% | | | | 7% | | | | 30% | |
|
30 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
31 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 | |
| |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $9.04 | | | | $9.71 | | | | $9.35 | | | | $9.68 | | | | $9.60 | |
| |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.32 | | | | 0.38 | | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.49 | | | | 0.54 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.14 | | | | (0.63) | | | | 0.40 | | | | (0.30) | | | | 0.07 | |
| | | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.46 | | | | (0.25) | | | | 0.84 | | | | 0.19 | | | | 0.61 | |
| |
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.30) | | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.48) | | | | (0.52) | | | | (0.53) | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $9.20 | | | | $9.04 | | | | $9.71 | | | | $9.35 | | | | $9.68 | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 5.35% | | | | (2.83)% | | | | 9.51% | | | | 1.79% | | | | 6.66% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $21,970 | | | | $36,708 | | | | $28,817 | | | | $23,579 | | | | $23,842 | |
| |
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $26,034 | | | | $32,570 | | | | $23,906 | | | | $25,005 | | | | $20,998 | |
| |
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.61% | | | | 4.10% | | | | 4.66% | | | | 5.02% | | | | 5.71% | |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 0.83% | | | | 0.73% | | | | 0.71% | | | | 0.72% | | | | 0.69% | |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.19% | | | | 0.13% | | | | 0.22% | | | | 0.23% | | | | 0.15% | |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.04% | | | | 0.07% | | | | 0.08% | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.06% | | | | 0.92% | | | | 0.97% | | | | 1.02% | | | | 0.92% | |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.06% | | | | 0.92% | | | | 0.97% | | | | 1.02% | | |
| 0.92%5
| |
| |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 23% | | | | 9% | | | | 11% | | | | 7% | | | | 30% | |
|
32 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
33 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS July 31, 2018
1. Organization
Oppenheimer Rochester New Jersey Municipal Fund (the “Fund”) is a separate series of Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust, a non-diversified, open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”), as amended. The Fund’s investment objective is to seek tax-free income. The Fund’s investment adviser is OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (“OFI Global” or the “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OFI (“OFI” or the “Sub-Adviser”). The Manager has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with OFI.
The Fund offers Class A, Class C and Class Y shares, and previously offered Class B shares for new purchase through June 29, 2012. Subsequent to that date, no new purchases of Class B shares were permitted. Reinvestment of dividend and/or capital gain distributions and exchanges of Class B shares into and from other Oppenheimer funds were permitted through May 31, 2018. Effective June 1, 2018 (the “Conversion Date”), all Class B shares converted to Class A shares. Class A shares are sold at their offering price, which is normally net asset value plus a front-end sales charge. Class C shares are sold, and Class B shares were sold, without a front-end sales charge but may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”). Class Y shares are sold to certain institutional investors or intermediaries without either a front-end sales charge or a CDSC, however, the intermediaries may impose charges on their accountholders who beneficially own Class Y shares. All classes of shares have identical rights and voting privileges with respect to the Fund in general and exclusive voting rights on matters that affect that class alone. Earnings, net assets and net asset value per share may differ due to each class having its own expenses, such as transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees and shareholder communications, directly attributable to that class. Class A and C shares have, and Class B shares had, separate distribution and/or service plans under which they pay, and Class B shares paid, fees. Class I and Class Y shares do not pay such fees. Previously issued Class B shares automatically converted to Class A shares 72 months after the date of purchase.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed in the Fund’s preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Security Valuation. All investments in securities are recorded at their estimated fair value, as described in Note 3.
Allocation of Income, Expenses, Gains and Losses. Income, expenses (other than those attributable to a specific class), gains and losses are allocated on a daily basis to each class of shares based upon the relative proportion of net assets represented by such class. Operating expenses directly attributable to a specific class are charged against the operations of that class.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders. Dividends and distributions to
|
34 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
shareholders, which are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. GAAP, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid annually or at other times as determined necessary by the Manager.
Investment Income. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Discount and premium, which are included in interest income on the Statement of Operations, are amortized or accreted daily.
Custodian Fees. “Custodian fees and expenses” in the Statement of Operations may include interest expense incurred by the Fund on any cash overdrafts of its custodian account during the period. Such cash overdrafts may result from the effects of failed trades in portfolio securities and from cash outflows resulting from unanticipated shareholder redemption activity. The Fund pays interest to its custodian on such cash overdraft at a rate equal to the Prime Rate plus 0.35%. The “Reduction to custodian expenses” line item, if applicable, represents earnings on cash balances maintained by the Fund during the period. Such interest expense and other custodian fees may be paid with these earnings.
Security Transactions. Security transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on securities sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
Indemnifications. The Fund’s organizational documents provide current and former Trustees and officers with a limited indemnification against liabilities arising in connection with the performance of their duties to the Fund. In the normal course of business, the Fund may also enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would be dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Federal Taxes. The Fund intends to comply with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income, including any net realized gain on investments not offset by capital loss carryforwards, if any, to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income or excise tax provision is required. The Fund files income tax returns in U.S. federal and applicable state jurisdictions. The statute of limitations on the Fund’s tax return filings generally remains open for the three preceding fiscal reporting period ends. The Fund has analyzed its tax positions for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018, including open tax years, and does not believe there are any uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Fund’s financial statements.
The tax components of capital shown in the following table represent distribution requirements the Fund must satisfy under the income tax regulations, losses the Fund may be able to offset against income and gains realized in future years and unrealized appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes.
|
35 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Undistributed Net Investment Income | | Undistributed Long-Term Gain | | | Accumulated Loss Carryforward1,2,3,4
| | | Net Unrealized Depreciation Based on cost of Securities and Other Investments for Federal Income Tax Purposes | |
| |
$4,116,610 | | | $— | | | | $136,672,359 | | | | $22,786,564 | |
1. At period end, the Fund had $136,672,359 of net capital loss carryforward available to offset future realized capital gains, if any, and thereby reduce future taxable gain distributions.
2. During the reporting period, the Fund did not utilize any capital loss carryforward.
3. During the previous reporting period, the Fund utilized $735,561 of capital loss carryforward to offset capital gains realized in that fiscal year.
4. During the reporting period, $22,257,929 of unused capital loss carryforward expired.
Net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) may differ for financial statement and tax purposes. The character of dividends and distributions made during the fiscal year from net investment income or net realized gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax requirements, which may differ from the character of net investment income or net realized gains presented in those financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Also, due to timing of dividends and distributions, the fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the fiscal year in which the income or net realized gain was recorded by the Fund.
Accordingly, the following amounts have been reclassified for the reporting period. Net assets of the Fund were unaffected by the reclassifications.
| | | | | | | | |
Reduction to Paid-in Capital | | Increase to Accumulated Net Investment Income | | | Reduction to Accumulated Net Realized Loss on Investments | |
| |
$22,257,929 | | | $787,661 | | | | $21,470,268 | |
The tax character of distributions paid during the reporting periods:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | |
| |
Distributions paid from: | | | | | | | | |
Exempt-interest dividends | | $ | 8,341,469 | | | $ | 15,041,090 | |
Ordinary income | | | 206,348 | | | | 491,524 | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 8,547,817 | | | $ | 15,532,614 | |
| | | | |
The aggregate cost of securities and other investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes at period end are noted in the following table. The primary difference between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments, if applicable, is attributable to the tax deferral of losses or tax realization of financial statement unrealized
|
36 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
gain or loss.
| | | | |
Federal tax cost of securities | | $ | 284,406,8971 | |
| | | | |
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 12,614,349 | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (35,400,913) | |
| | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (22,786,564) | |
| | | | |
1. The Federal tax cost of securities does not include cost of $19,937,247, which has otherwise been recognized for financial reporting purposes, related to bonds placed into trusts in conjunction with certain investment transactions.
See the Inverse Floating Rate Securities note in Note 4.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncement. In March 2017, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), ASU 2017-08. This provides guidance related to the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Manager is evaluating the impacts of these changes on the financial statements.
3. Securities Valuation
The Fund calculates the net asset value of its shares as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern Time, on each day the New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”) is open for trading, except in the case of a scheduled early closing of the Exchange, in which case the Fund will calculate net asset value of the shares as of the scheduled early closing time of the Exchange.
The Fund’s Board has adopted procedures for the valuation of the Fund’s securities and has delegated the day-to-day responsibility for valuation determinations under those procedures to the Manager. The Manager has established a Valuation Committee which is responsible for determining a fair valuation for any security for which market quotations are not readily available. The Valuation Committee’s fair valuation determinations are subject to review, approval and ratification by the Fund’s Board at least quarterly or more frequently, if necessary.
Valuation Methods and Inputs
Securities are valued primarily using unadjusted quoted market prices, when available, as supplied by third party pricing services or broker-dealers.
The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or the fair value of the types of securities described below:
Corporate and government debt securities (of U.S. or foreign issuers) and municipal debt
|
37 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
securities, short-term notes, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and asset-backed securities are valued at the mean between the bid and asked prices utilizing evaluated prices obtained from third party pricing services or broker-dealers who may use matrix pricing methods to determine the evaluated prices. Pricing services generally price debt securities assuming orderly transactions of an institutional “round lot” size, but some trades may occur in smaller, “odd lot” sizes, sometimes at lower prices than institutional round lot trades. Standard inputs generally considered by third-party pricing vendors include reported trade data, broker-dealer price quotations, benchmark yields, issuer spreads on comparable securities, the credit quality, yield, maturity, as well as other appropriate factors.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or when a significant event has occurred that would materially affect the value of the security, are fair valued either (i) by a standardized fair valuation methodology applicable to the security type or the significant event as previously approved by the Valuation Committee and the Fund’s Board or (ii) as determined in good faith by the Manager’s Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee considers all relevant facts that are reasonably available, through either public information or information available to the Manager, when determining the fair value of a security. Those standardized fair valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to, valuing securities at the last sale price or initially at cost and subsequently adjusting the value based on: changes in company specific fundamentals, changes in an appropriate securities index, or changes in the value of similar securities which may be further adjusted for any discounts related to security-specific resale restrictions. When possible, such methodologies use observable market inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices of similar securities, observable interest rates, currency rates and yield curves. The methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities nor can it be assured that the Fund can obtain the fair value assigned to a security if it were to sell the security.
Classifications
Each investment asset or liability of the Fund is assigned a level at measurement date based on the significance and source of the inputs to its valuation. Various data inputs may be used in determining the value of each of the Fund’s investments as of the reporting period end.
These data inputs are categorized in the following hierarchy under applicable financial accounting standards:
1) Level 1-unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (including securities actively traded on a securities exchange)
2) Level 2-inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and market corroborated inputs such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.)
3) Level 3-significant unobservable inputs (including the Manager’s own judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability).
The inputs used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated
|
38 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
with investing in those securities.
The table below categorizes amounts that are included in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities at period end based on valuation input level:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1— Unadjusted Quoted Prices | | | Level 2— Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | Level 3— Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | Value | |
| |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Jersey | | $ | — | | | $ | 197,407,253 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 197,407,253 | |
New York | | | — | | | | 19,582,924 | | | | — | | | | 19,582,924 | |
U.S. Possessions | | | — | | | | 64,567,403 | | | | — | | | | 64,567,403 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | — | | | $ | 281,557,580 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 281,557,580 | |
| | | | |
Forward currency exchange contracts and futures contracts, if any, are reported at their unrealized appreciation/depreciation at measurement date, which represents the change in the contract’s value from trade date. All additional assets and liabilities included in the above table are reported at their market value at measurement date.
For the reporting period, there were no transfers between levels.
4. Investments and Risks
Inverse Floating Rate Securities. The Fund invests in inverse floating rate securities that pay interest at a rate that varies inversely with short-term interest rates. Because inverse floating rate securities are leveraged instruments, the value of an inverse floating rate security will change more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and other market fluctuations than the market value of a conventional fixed-rate municipal security of similar maturity and credit quality, including the municipal bond underlying an inverse floating rate security.
An inverse floating rate security is created as part of a financial transaction referred to as a “tender option bond” transaction. In most cases, in a tender option bond transaction the Fund sells a fixed-rate municipal bond (the “underlying municipal bond”) to a trust (the “Trust”). The Trust then issues and sells short-term floating rate securities with a fixed principal amount representing a senior interest in the underlying municipal bond to third parties and a residual, subordinate interest in the underlying municipal bond (referred to as an “inverse floating rate security”) to the Fund. The interest rate on the short-term floating rate securities resets periodically, usually weekly, to a prevailing market rate and holders of these securities are granted the option to tender their securities back to the Trust for repurchase at their principal amount plus accrued interest thereon (the “purchase price”) periodically, usually daily or weekly. A remarketing agent for the Trust is required to attempt to re-sell any tendered short-term floating rate securities to new investors for the purchase price. If the remarketing agent is unable to successfully re-sell the tendered short-term floating rate securities, a liquidity
|
39 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
provider to the Trust must contribute cash to the Trust to ensure that the tendering holders receive the purchase price of their securities on the repurchase date.
Because holders of the short-term floating rate securities are granted the right to tender their securities to the Trust for repurchase at frequent intervals for the purchase price, with such payment effectively guaranteed by the liquidity provider, the securities generally bear short-term rates of interest commensurate with money market instruments. When interest is paid on the underlying municipal bond to the Trust, such proceeds are first used to pay the Trust’s administrative expenses and accrued interest to holders of the short-term floating rate securities, with any remaining amounts being paid to the Fund, as the holder of the inverse floating rate security. Accordingly, the amount of such interest on the underlying municipal bond paid to the Fund is inversely related to the rate of interest on the short-term floating rate securities. Additionally, because the principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities is fixed and is not adjusted in response to changes in the market value of the underlying municipal bond, any change in the market value of the underlying municipal bond is reflected entirely in a change to the value of the inverse floating rate security.
Typically, the terms of an inverse floating rate security grant certain rights to the Fund, as holder. For example, the Fund typically has the right upon request to require that the Trust compel a tender of the short-term floating rate securities to facilitate the Fund’s acquisition of the underlying municipal bond. Following such a request, the Fund pays the Trust the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities and a specified portion of any market value gain on the underlying municipal bond since its deposit into the Trust, which the Trust uses to redeem the short-term floating rate securities. The Trust then distributes the underlying municipal bond to the Fund. Through the exercise of this right, the Fund can voluntarily terminate or “collapse” the Trust, terminate its investment in the related inverse floating rate security and obtain the underlying municipal bond. Additionally, the Fund also typically has the right to exchange with the Trust (i) a principal amount of short-term floating rate securities held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of the inverse floating rate security or (ii) a principal amount of the inverse floating rate security held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of short-term floating rate securities (which are typically then sold to other investors). Through the exercise of this right, the Fund may increase (or decrease) the principal amount of short-term floating rate securities outstanding, thereby increasing (or decreasing) the amount of leverage provided by the short-term floating rate securities to the Fund’s investment exposure to the underlying municipal bond.
The Fund’s investments in inverse floating rate securities involve certain risks. As short-term interest rates rise, an inverse floating rate security produces less current income (and, in extreme cases, may pay no income) and as short-term interest rates fall, an inverse floating rate security produces more current income. Thus, if short-term interest rates rise after the issuance of the inverse floating rate security, any yield advantage is reduced or eliminated. All inverse floating rate securities entail some degree of leverage represented by the outstanding principal amount of the related short-term floating rate securities, relative to the par value of the underlying municipal bond. The value of, and income earned on, an inverse floating rate security that has a higher degree of leverage will fluctuate more significantly in response
|
40 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
to changes in interest rates and to changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond than that of an inverse floating rate security with a lower degree of leverage, and is more likely to be eliminated entirely under adverse market conditions. Changes in the value of an inverse floating rate security will also be more significant than changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond because the leverage provided by the related short-term floating rate securities increases the sensitivity of an inverse floating rate security to changes in interest rates and to the market value of the underlying municipal bond. An inverse floating rate security can be expected to underperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is decreasing (or is already small) or when long-term interest rates are rising, but can be expected to outperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is increasing (or is already large) or when long-term interest rates are falling. Additionally, a tender option bond transaction typically provides for the automatic termination or “collapse” of a Trust upon the occurrence of certain adverse events, usually referred to as “mandatory tender events” or “tender option termination events.” These events may include, among others, a credit ratings downgrade of the underlying municipal bond below a specified level, a decrease in the market value of the underlying municipal bond below a specified amount, a bankruptcy of the liquidity provider or the inability of the remarketing agent to resell to new investors short-term floating rate securities that have been tendered for repurchase by holders thereof. Following the occurrence of such an event, the underlying municipal bond is generally sold for current market value and the proceeds distributed to holders of the short-term floating rate securities and inverse floating rate security, with the holder of the inverse floating rate security (the Fund) generally receiving the proceeds of such sale only after the holders of the short-term floating rate securities have received proceeds equal to the purchase price of their securities (and the liquidity provider is generally required to contribute cash to the Trust only in an amount sufficient to ensure that the holders of the short-term floating rate securities receive the purchase price of their securities in connection with such termination of the Trust). Following the occurrence of such events, the Fund could potentially lose the entire amount of its investment in the inverse floating rate security.
Finally, the Fund may enter into shortfall/reimbursement agreements with the liquidity provider of certain tender option bond transactions in connection with certain inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund. These agreements commit the Fund to reimburse the liquidity provider to the extent that the liquidity provider must provide cash to a Trust, including following the termination of a Trust resulting from the occurrence of a “mandatory tender event.” In connection with the occurrence of such an event and the termination of the Trust triggered thereby, the shortfall/reimbursement agreement will make the Fund liable for the amount of the negative difference, if any, between the liquidation value of the underlying municipal bond and the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Under the standard terms of a tender option bond transaction, absent such a shortfall/ reimbursement agreement, the Fund, as holder of the inverse floating rate security, would not be required to make such a reimbursement payment to the liquidity provider. The Manager monitors the Fund’s potential exposure with respect to these agreements on a daily basis
|
41 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
and intends to take action to terminate the Fund’s investment in related inverse floating rate securities, if it deems it appropriate to do so.
When the Fund creates an inverse floating rate security in a tender option bond transaction by selling an underlying municipal bond to a Trust, the transaction is considered a secured borrowing for financial reporting purposes. As a result of such accounting treatment, the Fund includes the underlying municipal bond on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities (but does not separately include the related inverse floating rate security on either). The Fund also includes a liability on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities equal to the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest on the related short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Interest on the underlying municipal bond is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations, while interest payable on the related short-term floating rate securities is recorded as interest expense. At period end, municipal bond holdings with a value of $28,960,250 shown on the Fund’s Statement of Investments are held by such Trusts and serve as the underlying municipal bonds for the related $19,280,000 in short-term floating rate securities issued and outstanding at that date.
At period end, the inverse floating rate securities associated with tender option bond transactions accounted for as secured borrowings were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| |
$ 1,250,000 | | NJ GO Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF0553-1 Trust | | | 12.030% | | | | 6/1/27 | | | $ | 2,028,575 | |
1,250,000 | | NJ GO Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF0553-2 Trust | | | 12.030 | | | | 6/1/28 | | | | 1,958,013 | |
1,585,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2105 Trust | | | 12.572 | | | | 5/1/29 | | | | 2,311,231 | |
1,345,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2105-2 Trust | | | 12.590 | | | | 5/1/30 | | | | 1,950,021 | |
1,000,000 | | Rutgers State University NJ Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2105-3 Trust | | | 12.590 | | | | 5/1/38 | | | | 1,432,410 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 9,680,250 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. For a list of abbreviations used in the Inverse Floater table see the Portfolio Abbreviations table at the end of the Statement of Investments.
2. Represents the current interest rate for the inverse floating rate security.
The Fund may also purchase an inverse floating rate security created as part of a tender option bond transaction not initiated by the Fund when a third party, such as a municipal issuer or financial institution, transfers an underlying municipal bond to a Trust. For financial reporting purposes, the Fund includes the inverse floating rate security related to such transaction on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities, and interest on the security is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations.
The Fund may invest in inverse floating rate securities with any degree of leverage (as measured by the outstanding principal amount of related short-term floating rate securities).
|
42 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
However, the Fund may only expose up to 20% of its total assets to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities. This limitation is measured by comparing the aggregate principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities that are related to the inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund to the total assets of the Fund. The Fund’s exposure to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities amounts to $19,280,000 or 6.73% of its total assets at period end.
Securities on a When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis. The Fund may purchase securities on a “when-issued” basis, and may purchase or sell securities on a “delayed delivery” basis. “When-issued” or “delayed delivery” refers to securities whose terms and indenture are available and for which a market exists, but which are not available for immediate delivery. Delivery and payment for securities that have been purchased by the Fund on a when-issued basis normally takes place within six months and possibly as long as two years or more after the trade date. During this period, such securities do not earn interest, are subject to market fluctuation and may increase or decrease in value prior to their delivery. The purchase of securities on a when-issued basis may increase the volatility of the Fund’s net asset value to the extent the Fund executes such transactions while remaining substantially fully invested. When the Fund engages in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions, it relies on the buyer or seller, as the case may be, to complete the transaction. Their failure to do so may cause the Fund to lose the opportunity to obtain or dispose of the security at a price and yield it considers advantageous. The Fund may also sell securities that it purchased on a when-issued basis or forward commitment prior to settlement of the original purchase.
At period end, the Fund had sold securities issued on a delayed delivery basis as follows:
| | | | |
| | When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis Transactions | |
| |
Sold securities | | | $ 2,079,742 | |
Credit Risk. The Fund invests in high-yield, non-investment-grade bonds, which may be subject to a greater degree of credit risk. Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer to meet interest or principal payments or both as they become due. The Fund may acquire securities that have missed an interest payment, and is not obligated to dispose of securities whose issuers or underlying obligors subsequently miss an interest and/or principal payment
In June 2016, Congress passed the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”). PROMESA established a federally-appointed fiscal oversight board (the “Oversight Board”) to oversee Puerto Rico’s financial operations and allows the Oversight Board to file cases on behalf of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or one of its instrumentalities to restructure debt and other obligations of the relevant entity in a “Title III” proceeding. Title III incorporates many provisions of the federal Bankruptcy Code for U.S. territories, and incorporates legal mechanisms for a litigation stay and restructuring of pension and debt obligations, among other provisions. In early May 2017, Title III petitions were filed for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation
|
43 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
(“COFINA”), two of the largest issuers of Puerto Rico debt. Title III petitions for Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority (“PRHTA”) and Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) were subsequently filed in mid-May and early July, respectively. Title III petitions for additional Puerto Rican instrumentalities may be filed. These restructuring proceedings create uncertainty as to the treatment of claims of varying degrees of seniority and the levels and priorities of payment from the affected entities.
Information concerning securities not accruing interest at period end is as follows:
| | | | |
Cost | | $ | 54,350,088 | |
Market Value | | $ | 27,675,647 | |
Market Value as % of Net Assets | | | 10.80% | |
Concentration Risk. The Fund invests a large percentage of its total assets in obligations of issuers within its respective state and U.S. territories. Risks may arise from geographic concentration in any state, commonwealth or territory, such as Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands. Certain economic, regulatory or political developments occurring in the state, commonwealth or territory such as ongoing developments in Puerto Rico may impair the ability of certain issuers of municipal securities to pay principal and interest on their obligations.
5. Market Risk Factors
The Fund’s investments in securities and/or financial derivatives may expose the Fund to various market risk factors:
Commodity Risk. Commodity risk relates to the change in value of commodities or commodity indexes as they relate to increases or decreases in the commodities market. Commodities are physical assets that have tangible properties. Examples of these types of assets are crude oil, heating oil, metals, livestock, and agricultural products.
Credit Risk. Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer of debt to meet interest and principal payments, or both, as they come due. In general, lower-grade, higher-yield debt securities are subject to credit risk to a greater extent than lower-yield, higher-quality securities.
Equity Risk. Equity risk relates to the change in value of equity securities as they relate to increases or decreases in the general market.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk. Foreign exchange rate risk relates to the change in the U.S. dollar value of a security held that is denominated in a foreign currency. The U.S. dollar value of a foreign currency denominated security will decrease as the dollar appreciates against the currency, while the U.S. dollar value will increase as the dollar depreciates against the currency.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk refers to the fluctuations in value of fixed-income securities resulting from the inverse relationship between price and yield. For example, an increase in general interest rates will tend to reduce the market value of already issued fixed-income investments, and a decline in general interest rates will tend to increase their
|
44 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
5. Market Risk Factors (Continued)
value. In addition, debt securities with longer maturities, which tend to have higher yields, are subject to potentially greater fluctuations in value from changes in interest rates than obligations with shorter maturities.
Volatility Risk. Volatility risk refers to the magnitude of the movement, but not the direction of the movement, in a financial instrument’s price over a defined time period. Large increases or decreases in a financial instrument’s price over a relative time period typically indicate greater volatility risk, while small increases or decreases in its price typically indicate lower volatility risk.
6. Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund has authorized an unlimited number of no par value shares of beneficial interest of each class. Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold1 | | | 1,247,452 | | | $ | 10,931,851 | | | | | | | | 2,501,657 | | | $ | 23,393,526 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 544,997 | | | | 4,746,712 | | | | | | | | 899,783 | | | | 8,406,903 | |
Redeemed | | | (7,103,366) | | | | (61,255,241) | | | | | | | | (6,922,609) | | | | (64,678,763) | |
Net decrease | | | (5,310,917) | | | $ | (45,576,678) | | | | | | | | (3,521,169) | | | $ | (32,878,334) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | — | | | $ | — | | | | | | | | 166 | | | $ | 1,509 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 2,409 | | | | 20,887 | | | | | | | | 7,818 | | | | 73,424 | |
Redeemed1 | | | (187,602) | | | | (1,630,804) | | | | | | | | (119,541) | | | | (1,127,726) | |
Net decrease | | | (185,193) | | | $ | (1,609,917) | | | | | | | | (111,557) | | | $ | (1,052,793) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 403,037 | | | $ | 3,471,733 | | | | | | | | 677,554 | | | $ | 6,313,913 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 216,093 | | | | 1,882,421 | | | | | | | | 354,830 | | | | 3,318,598 | |
Redeemed | | | (3,652,882) | | | | (31,583,876) | | | | | | | | (3,062,135) | | | | (28,456,615) | |
Net decrease | | | (3,033,752) | | | $ | (26,229,722) | | | | | | | | (2,029,751) | | | $ | (18,824,104) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 808,666 | | | $ | 7,129,287 | | | | | | | | 2,435,390 | | | $ | 22,697,741 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 97,328 | | | | 848,879 | | | | | | | | 140,507 | | | | 1,309,757 | |
Redeemed | | | (2,581,033) | | | | (22,219,427) | | | | | | | | (1,480,370) | | | | (13,736,682) | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | (1,675,039) | | | $ | (14,241,261) | | | | | | | | 1,095,527 | | | $ | 10,270,816 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. All outstanding Class B shares converted to Class A shares on June 1, 2018.
7. Purchases and Sales of Securities
The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities, other than short-term
|
45 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
7. Purchases and Sales of Securities (Continued)
obligations, for the reporting period were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Purchases | | | Sales | |
Investment securities | | $ | 68,359,752 | | | $ | 168,338,432 | |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Management Fees. Under the investment advisory agreement, the Fund pays the Manager a management fee based on the daily net assets of the Fund at an annual rate as shown in the following table:
| | | | |
Fee Schedule | | | |
Up to $200 million | | | 0.60% | |
Next $100 million | | | 0.55 | |
Next $200 million | | | 0.50 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.45 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.40 | |
Over $1 billion | | | 0.35 | |
The Fund’s effective management fee for the reporting period was 0.59% of average annual net assets before any applicable waivers.
Sub-Adviser Fees. The Manager has retained the Sub-Adviser to provide the day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. Under the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Manager pays the Sub-Adviser an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the investment management fee collected by the Manager from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any investment management fee waivers. The fee paid to the Sub-Adviser is paid by the Manager, not by the Fund.
Transfer Agent Fees. OFI Global (the “Transfer Agent”) serves as the transfer and shareholder servicing agent for the Fund. The Fund pays the Transfer Agent a fee based on annual net assets, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. Fees incurred and average net assets for each class with respect to these services are detailed in the Statement of Operations and Financial Highlights, respectively.
Sub-Transfer Agent Fees. The Transfer Agent has retained Shareholder Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of OFI (the “Sub-Transfer Agent”), to provide the day-to-day transfer agent and shareholder servicing of the Fund. Under the Sub-Transfer Agency Agreement, the Transfer Agent pays the Sub-Transfer Agent an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the transfer agent fee collected by the Transfer Agent from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. The fee paid to the Sub-Transfer Agent is paid by the Transfer Agent, not by the Fund.
Trustees’ Compensation. The Fund has adopted an unfunded retirement plan (the “Plan”) for the Fund’s Independent Trustees. Benefits are based on years of service and fees paid to each Trustee during their period of service. The Plan was frozen with respect to adding new
|
46 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
participants effective December 31, 2006 (the “Freeze Date”) and existing Plan Participants as of the Freeze Date will continue to receive accrued benefits under the Plan. Active Independent Trustees as of the Freeze Date have each elected a distribution method with respect to their benefits under the Plan.
During the reporting period, the Fund’s projected benefit obligations, payments to retired Trustees and accumulated liability were as follows:
| | | | |
Projected Benefit Obligations Increased | | $ | — | |
Payments Made to Retired Trustees | | | 3,220 | |
Accumulated Liability as of July 31, 2018 | | | 27,763 | |
The Fund’s Board of Trustees (“Board”) has adopted a compensation deferral plan for Independent Trustees that enables Trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Fund. For purposes of determining the amount owed to the Trustee under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of the Fund or in other Oppenheimer funds selected by the Trustee. The Fund purchases shares of the funds selected for deferral by the Trustee in amounts equal to his or her deemed investment, resulting in a Fund asset equal to the deferred compensation liability. Such assets are included as a component of “Other” within the asset section of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferral of Trustees’ fees under the plan will not affect the net assets of the Fund and will not materially affect the Fund’s assets, liabilities or net investment income per share. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the compensation deferral plan.
Distribution and Service Plan (12b-1) Fees. Under its General Distributor’s Agreement with the Fund, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (the “Distributor”) acts as the Fund’s principal underwriter in the continuous public offering of the Fund’s classes of shares.
Service Plan for Class A Shares. The Fund has adopted a Service Plan (the “Plan”) for Class A shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the Plan, the Fund reimburses the Distributor for a portion of its costs incurred for services provided to accounts that hold Class A shares. Reimbursement is made periodically at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the daily net assets of Class A shares of the Fund. The Distributor currently uses all of those fees to pay dealers, brokers, banks and other financial institutions periodically for providing personal service and maintenance of accounts of their customers that hold Class A shares. Any unreimbursed expenses the Distributor incurs with respect to Class A shares in any fiscal year cannot be recovered in subsequent periods. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plan are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Distribution and Service Plans for Class B and Class C Shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution and Service Plans (the “Plans”) for Class C shares, and had previously adopted a similar plan for Class B shares, pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act to compensate
|
47 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
the Distributor for distributing those share classes, maintaining accounts and providing shareholder services. Under the Plans, the Fund pays the Distributor an annual asset-based sales charge of 0.75% on Class C shares’ daily net assets. The Fund paid the Distributor an annual asset-based sales charge of 0.75% on Class B shares prior to their Conversion Date. The Fund also pays a service fee under the Plans at an annual rate of 0.15% of daily net assets and previously paid this fee for Class B prior to their Conversion Date. The Plans continue in effect from year to year only if the Fund’s Board of Trustees votes annually to approve their continuance at an in person meeting called for that purpose. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plans are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Sales Charges. Front-end sales charges and CDSC do not represent expenses of the Fund. They are deducted from the proceeds of sales of Fund shares prior to investment or from redemption proceeds prior to remittance, as applicable. The sales charges retained by the Distributor from the sale of shares and the CDSC retained by the Distributor on the redemption of shares is shown in the following table for the period indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended | | Class A Front-End Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class A Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class B1 Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class C Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | |
July 31, 2018 | | | $10,193 | | | | $2,890 | | | | $1,694 | | | | $3,208 | |
1. Effective June 1, 2018, all Class B shares converted to Class A shares.
9. Borrowings and Other Financing
Borrowings. The Fund can borrow money from banks in amounts up to one third of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less all liabilities and indebtedness other than borrowings (meaning that the value of those assets must be at least 300% of the amount borrowed). The Fund can use those borrowings for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities. The Fund also may borrow to meet redemption obligations or for temporary and emergency purposes. When the Fund invests borrowed money in portfolio securities, it is using a speculative investment technique known as leverage and changes in the value of the Fund’s investments will have a larger effect on its share price than if it did not borrow because of the effect of leverage.
The Fund can also use the borrowings for other investment-related purposes, including in connection with the Fund’s inverse floater investments as discussed in Note 4. The Fund may use the borrowings to reduce the leverage amount of, or unwind or “collapse” trusts that issued “inverse floaters” owned by the Fund, or in circumstances in which the Fund has entered into a shortfall and forbearance agreement with the sponsor of the inverse floater trust to meet the Fund’s obligation to reimburse the sponsor of the inverse floater for the difference between the liquidation value of the underlying bond and the amount due to
|
48 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
holders of the short-term floating rate notes issued by the Trust. See the discussion in Note 4 (Inverse Floating Rate Securities) for additional information.
The Fund will pay interest and may pay other fees in connection with loans. If the Fund does borrow, it will be subject to greater expenses than funds that do not borrow. The interest on borrowed money and the other fees incurred in conjunction with loans are an expense that might reduce the Fund’s yield and return. Expenses incurred by the Fund with respect to interest on borrowings and commitment fees are disclosed separately or as other expenses on the Statement of Operations.
The Fund entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with conduit lenders and Citibank N.A. which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed, secured borrowing facility that permits borrowings of up to $2.5 billion, collectively, by the Oppenheimer Rochester Funds. To secure the loan, the Fund pledges investment securities in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Securities held in collateralized accounts to cover these borrowings are noted in the Statement of Investments. Interest is charged to the Fund, based on its borrowings, at current commercial paper issuance rates (2.1405% at period end). The Fund pays additional fees monthly to its lender on its outstanding borrowings to manage and administer the facility and is allocated its pro-rata share of an annual structuring fee and ongoing commitment fees both of which are based on the total facility size. Total fees and interest that are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations related to its participation in the borrowing facility during the reporting period equal 0.15% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis. The Fund has the right to prepay such loans and terminate its participation in the conduit loan facility at any time upon prior notice.
At period end, the Fund had borrowings outstanding at an interest rate of 2.1405%.
Details of the borrowings for the reporting period are as follows:
| | | | |
Average Daily Loan Balance | | $ | 9,128,493 | |
Average Daily Interest Rate | | | 1.613 | % |
Fees Paid | | $ | 287,945 | |
Interest Paid | | $ | 151,852 | |
Reverse Repurchase Agreements. The Fund may engage in reverse repurchase agreements. A reverse repurchase agreement is the sale of one or more securities to a counterparty at an agreed-upon purchase price with the simultaneous agreement to repurchase those securities on a future date at a higher repurchase price. The repurchase price represents the repayment of the purchase price and interest accrued thereon over the term of the repurchase agreement. The cash received by the Fund in connection with a reverse repurchase agreement may be used for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities or for other purposes such as those described in the preceding “Borrowings” note.
The Fund entered into a Committed Repurchase Transaction Facility (the “Facility”) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (the “counterparty”) which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed reverse repurchase agreement facility that permits
|
49 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
aggregate outstanding reverse repurchase agreements of up to $750 million, collectively. Interest is charged to the Fund on the purchase price of outstanding reverse repurchase agreements at current LIBOR rates plus an applicable spread. The Fund is also allocated its pro-rata share of an annual structuring fee based on the total Facility size and ongoing commitment fees based on the total unused amount of the Facility. The Fund retains the economic exposure to fluctuations in the value of securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility and therefore these transactions are considered secured borrowings for financial reporting purposes. The Fund also continues to receive the economic benefit of interest payments received on securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements, in the form of a direct payment from the counterparty. These payments are included in interest income on the Statement of Operations. Total fees and interest related to the Fund’s participation in the Facility during the reporting period are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations and equal 0.04% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis.
The securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility are valued on a daily basis. To the extent this value, after adjusting for certain margin requirements of the Facility, exceeds the cash proceeds received, the Fund may request the counterparty to return securities equal in margin value to this excess. To the extent that the cash proceeds received exceed the margin value of the securities subject to the transaction, the counterparty may request additional securities from the Fund. The Fund has the right to declare each Wednesday as the repurchase date for any outstanding reverse repurchase agreement upon delivery of advanced notification and may also recall any security subject to such a transaction by substituting eligible securities of equal or greater margin value according to the Facility’s terms.
The Fund executed no transactions under the Facility during the reporting period.
Details of reverse repurchase agreement transactions for the reporting period are as follows:
|
50 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees
Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Oppenheimer Rochester New Jersey Municipal Fund (the “Fund”), a separate series of Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust, including the statement of investments, as of July 31, 2018, the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the “financial statements”) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of July 31, 2018, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2018, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
KPMG LLP
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Oppenheimer Funds investment companies, however we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Oppenheimer Funds investment companies since at least 1969.
Denver, Colorado
September 27, 2018
|
51 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
FEDERAL INCOME TAX INFORMATION Unaudited
In early 2018, if applicable, shareholders of record received information regarding all dividends and distributions paid to them by the Fund during calendar year 2017.
None of the dividends paid by the Fund during the reporting period are eligible for the corporate dividend-received deduction. 97.59% of the dividends were derived from interest on municipal bonds and are not subject to federal income taxes. To the extent a shareholder is subject to any state or local tax laws, some or all of the dividends received may be taxable.
The foregoing information is presented to assist shareholders in reporting distributions received from the Fund to the Internal Revenue Service. Because of the complexity of the federal regulations which may affect your individual tax return and the many variations in state and local tax regulations, we recommend that you consult your tax advisor for specific guidance.
|
52 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
PORTFOLIO PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND GUIDELINES;
UPDATES TO STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Unaudited
The Fund has adopted Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines under which the Fund votes proxies relating to securities (“portfolio proxies”) held by the Fund. A description of the Fund’s Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), (ii) on the Fund’s website at www.oppenheimerfunds.com, and (iii) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the Fund is required to file Form N-PX, with its complete proxy voting record for the 12 months ended June 30th, no later than August 31st of each year. The Fund’s voting record is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), and (ii) in the Form N-PX filing on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first quarter and the third quarter of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Form N-Q filings are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Those forms may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
Householding—Delivery of Shareholder Documents
This is to inform you about OppenheimerFunds’ “householding” policy. If more than one member of your household maintains an account in a particular fund, OppenheimerFunds will mail only one copy of the fund’s prospectus (or, if available, the fund’s summary prospectus), annual and semiannual report and privacy policy. The consolidation of these mailings, called householding, benefits your fund through reduced mailing expense, and benefits you by reducing the volume of mail you receive from OppenheimerFunds. Householding does not affect the delivery of your account statements.
Please note that we will continue to household these mailings for as long as you remain an OppenheimerFunds shareholder, unless you request otherwise. If you prefer to receive multiple copies of these materials, please call us at 1.800.CALL-OPP (225-5677). You may also notify us in writing or via email. We will begin sending you individual copies of the prospectus (or, if available, the summary prospectus), reports and privacy policy within 30 days of receiving your request to stop householding.
|
53 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
DISTRIBUTION SOURCES Unaudited
For any distribution that took place over the last six months of the Fund’s reporting period, the table below details on a per-share basis the percentage of the Fund’s total distribution payment amount that was derived from the following sources: net income, net profit from the sale of securities, and other capital sources. Other capital sources represent a return of capital. A return of capital may occur, for example, when some or all of the money that you invested in the Fund is paid back to you. A return of capital distribution does not necessarily reflect the Fund’s investment performance and should not be confused with “yield” or “income.” You should not draw any conclusions about the Fund’s investment performance from the amounts of these distributions. This information is based upon income and capital gains using generally accepted accounting principles as of the date of each distribution. If the Fund (or an underlying fund in which the Fund invests) invests in real estate investment trusts (REITs) and/or master limited partnerships (MLPs), the percentages attributed to each category are estimated using historical information because the character of the amounts received from the REITs and/or MLPs in which the Fund (or underlying fund) invests is unknown until after the end of the calendar year. Because the Fund is actively managed, the relative amount of the Fund’s total distributions derived from various sources over the calendar year may change. Please note that this information should not be used for tax reporting purposes as the tax character of distributable income may differ from the amounts used for this notification. You will receive IRS tax forms in the first quarter of each calendar year detailing the actual amount of the taxable and non-taxable portion of distributions paid to you during the tax year.
For the most current information, please go to oppenheimerfunds.com. Select your Fund, and scroll down to the ‘Dividends’ table under ‘Analytics’.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fund Name | | Pay Date | | | Net Income | | | Net Profit from Sale | | | Other Capital Sources | |
| |
Oppenheimer Rochester New Jersey Municipal Fund | | | 2/20/18 | | | | 85.2% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 14.8% | |
| |
Oppenheimer Rochester New Jersey Municipal Fund | | | 5/22/18 | | | | 94.3% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 5.7% | |
| |
Oppenheimer Rochester New Jersey Municipal Fund | | | 7/24/18 | | | | 81.9% | | | | 0.0% | | | | 18.1% | |
| |
|
54 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited
| | |
Name, Position(s) Held with the | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years; Other Trusteeships/ |
Fund, Length of Service, Year of | | Directorships Held. |
Birth | | |
| |
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES | | The address of each Trustee in the chart below is 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924. Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, or until his or her resignation, retirement, death or removal. Each of the Trustees in the chart below oversees 48 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. |
| |
Brian F. Wruble, Chairman of the Board of Trustees (since 2007) and Trustee (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1943 | | Governor of Community Foundation of the Florida Keys (non-profit) (since July 2012); Director of TCP Capital, Inc. (registered business development company) (since November 2015); Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees (since August 2011), Chairman of the Board of Trustees (August 2007-August 2011), Trustee of the Board of Trustees (since August 1991) of The Jackson Laboratory (non-profit); Member of Zurich Insurance Group’s Investment Management Advisory Council (insurance) (October 2004-February 2017); Treasurer (since 2007) and Trustee (since May 1992) of the Institute for Advanced Study (non-profit educational institute); Director of Special Value Opportunities Fund, LLC (registered investment company) (affiliate of the Sub-Adviser’s parent company) (September 2004- June 2015); General Partner of Odyssey Partners, L.P. (hedge fund) (September 1995-December 2007); Special Limited Partner of Odyssey Investment Partners, LLC (private equity investment) (January 1999-September 2004). Mr. Wruble has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since April 2001, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Beth Ann Brown, Trustee (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1968 | | Director, Board of Directors of Caron Engineering Inc. (since January 2018); Advisor, Board of Advisors of Caron Engineering Inc. (December 2014-December 2017); Independent Consultant (since September 2012); held the following positions at Columbia Management Investment Advisers LLC: Head of Intermediary Distribution (2008-2012), Managing Director, Strategic Relations (2005-2008), Managing Director, Head of National Accounts (2004-2005); Senior Vice President, National Account Manager (2002-2004), Senior Vice President, Key Account Manager (1999-2002) and Vice President, Key Account Manager (1996-1999) of Liberty Funds Distributor, Inc.; President and Director, of Acton Shapleigh Youth Conservation Corps (non -profit) (2012-2015); and Vice President and Director of Grahamtastic Connection (non-profit) (since May 2013). Ms. Brown has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since January 2016, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., Trustee (since 2013) Year of Birth: 1948 | | Director of THL Credit, Inc. (since November 2016) (alternative credit investment manager); Advisory Board Member of the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs of Syracuse University (April 2012-September 2016); Director of Mercury Defense Systems Inc. (information technology) (August 2011-February 2013); Trustee of the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation Athletic & Scholarship Program (since November 2010); Advisory Board Member of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory (federally-funded research development) (since May 2010); Director of The Boeing Company (aerospace and defense) (since October 2009); Trustee of MITRE Corporation (federally-funded research development) (since September 2008); Independent Director of QinetiQ Group Plc (defense technology and security) (February 2008-August 2011); Chairman of Monster |
|
55 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited / Continued
| | |
Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., Continued | | Worldwide, Inc. (career services) (March 2015-November 2016), Director of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (career services) (February 2008-June 2011); Lead Director (June 2011-March 2015); Chairman of Alenia North America, Inc. (military and defense products) (January 2008-October 2009); Director of SRA International, Inc. (information technology and services) (January 2008-July 2011); President of Giambastiani Group LLC (national security and energy consulting) (since October 2007); United States Navy, career nuclear submarine officer (June 1970-October 2007); Seventh Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (2005-October 2007); Supreme Allied Commander of NATO Allied Command Transformation (2003- 2005) and Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command (2002-2005). Since his retirement from the U.S. Navy in October 2007, Admiral Giambastiani has also served on numerous U.S. Government advisory boards, investigations and task forces for the Secretaries of Defense, State and Interior and the Central Intelligence Agency. He recently completed serving as a federal commissioner on the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission. Admiral Giambastiani has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since February 2013, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. For purposes of this report, Admiral Giambastiani is identified as a Trustee. |
| |
Elizabeth Krentzman, Trustee (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1959 | | Trustee of the University of Florida National Board Foundation (since September 2017); Member of the Cartica Funds Board of Directors (private investment funds) (since January 2017); Member of the University of Florida Law Center Association, Inc. Board of Trustees and Audit Committee Member (since April 2016); Member of University of Florida Law Advisory Board, Washington, DC Alumni Group (since 2015); Advisory Board Member of the Securities and Exchange Commission Historical Society (since 2007); held the following positions at Deloitte & Touche LLP: Principal and Chief Regulatory Advisor for Asset Management Services (2007 - 2014) and U.S. Mutual Fund Leader (2011 - 2014); General Counsel of the Investment Company Institute (trade association) (June 2004 - April 2007); held the following positions at Deloitte & Touche LLP: National Director of the Investment Management Regulatory Consulting Practice (1997 - 2004), Principal (2003 - 2004), Director (1998 - 2003) and Senior Manager (1997 - 1998); Assistant Director of the Division of Investment Management – Office of Disclosure and Investment Adviser Regulation of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (1996 - 1997) and various positions with the Division of Investment Management – Office of Regulatory Policy (1991 - 1996) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Associate at Ropes & Gray LLP (1987 - 1991). Ms. Krentzman has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since August 2014, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Mary F. Miller, Trustee (since 2004) Year of Birth: 1942 | | Trustee of International House (not-for-profit) (since June 2007); Trustee of the American Symphony Orchestra (not-for-profit) (October 1998-November 2011); and Senior Vice President and General Auditor of American Express Company (financial services company) (July 1998-February 2003). Ms. Miller has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since August 2004, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
|
56 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | |
Joel W. Motley, Trustee (since 2002) Year of Birth: 1952 | | Director of Office of Finance Federal Home Loan Bank (since September 2016); Director of Greenwall Foundation (since October 2013); Member of Board and Investment Committee of The Greenwall Foundation (since April 2013); Member of the Vestry of Trinity Wall Street (since April 2012); Director of Southern Africa Legal Services Foundation (since March 2012); Board Member and Investment Committee Member of Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting (non-profit journalism) (since March 2011); Managing Director of Public Capital Advisors, LLC (privately- held financial advisor) (since January 2006); Managing Director of Carmona Motley, Inc. (privately-held financial advisor) (since January 2002); Director of Columbia Equity Financial Corp. (privately-held financial advisor) (2002-2007); Managing Director of Carmona Motley Hoffman Inc. (privately-held financial advisor) (January 1998-December 2001); Member of the Finance and Budget Committee of the Council on Foreign Relations, Member of the Investment Committee and Board of Human Rights Watch (since July 2000) and Member of the Investment Committee and Board of Historic Hudson Valley (since February 2010). Mr. Motley has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since October 2002, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Joanne Pace, Trustee (since 2013) Year of Birth: 1958 | | Advisory Board Director of Massey Quick Simon & Co. (wealth management), LLC (since October 2014); Board Director of Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey (healthcare) (since November 2012); Advisory Board Director of The Alberleen Group LLC (investment banking) (since March 2012); Governing Council Member (since 2016) and Chair of Education Committee (since 2017) of Independent Directors Council (IDC) (since 2016); Board Member of 100 Women in Finance (non-profit) (since January 2015); Advisory Council Member of Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital (non-profit) (since May 2012); Director of The Komera Project (non-profit) (April 2012-2016); New York Advisory Board Director of Peace First (non-profit) (March 2010-2013); Senior Advisor of SECOR Asset Management, LP (2010-2011); Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of Morgan Stanley Investment Management (2006-2010); Partner and Chief Operating Officer of FrontPoint Partners, LLC (hedge fund) (2005-2006); held the following positions at Credit Suisse (investment banking): Managing Director (2003-2005); Global Head of Human Resources and member of Executive Board and Operating Committee (2004-2005), Global Head of Operations and Product Control (2003-2004); held the following positions at Morgan Stanley: Managing Director (1997-2003), Controller and Principal Accounting Officer (1999-2003); Chief Financial Officer (temporary assignment) for the Oversight Committee, Long Term Capital Management (1998-1999). Lead Independent Director and Chair of the Audit and Nominating Committee of The Global Chartist Fund, LLC of Oppenheimer Asset Management (2011-2012); Board Director of Managed Funds Association (2008-2010); Board Director of Morgan Stanley Foundation (2007-2010) and Investment Committee Chair (2008-2010). Ms. Pace has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since November 2012, including as an Advisory Board Member for certain Oppenheimer funds, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Board’s deliberations. For purposes of this report, Ms. Pace is identified as a Trustee. |
|
57 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited / Continued
| | |
Daniel Vandivort, Trustee (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1954 | | Chairman and Lead Independent Director/Trustee (March 2010-September 2014), Chairman of the Audit Committee (March 2009-September 2014) and Director/Trustee (December 2008-September 2014) of the Board of Directors/ Trustees of Value Line Funds; Trustee (since January 2015) and Treasurer and Chairman of the Audit Committee and Finance Committee (since January 2016) of Board of Trustees of Huntington Disease Foundation of America; Trustee, Board of Trustees, RIM Retirement Savings Plan (2005-2007); President and Chief Investment Officer, Robeco Investment Management, formerly known as Weiss Peck and Greer (January 2005-June 2007); Member, Management Committee of Robeco Investment Management (2001-2007); Chairman and Trustee of the Board of Trustees of Weiss, Peck and Greer Funds (2004-2005); Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income, Weiss, Peck and Greer (November 1994-January 2005); Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income, CS First Boston Investment Management (January 1992-November 1994); Director, Global Product Development, First Boston Asset Management (November 1989-January 1992); Vice President, Fixed Income Sales, First Boston Corp. (May 1984-November 1989). Mr. Vandivort has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since 2014, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| | |
INTERESTED TRUSTEE AND OFFICER | | Mr. Steinmetz is an “Interested Trustee” because he is affiliated with the Manager and the Sub-Adviser by virtue of his positions as Chairman of the Sub-Adviser and officer and director of the Manager. Both as a Trustee and as an officer, Mr. Steinmetz serves for an indefinite term, or until his resignation, retirement, death or removal. Mr. Steinmetz’s address is 225 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10281-1008. Mr. Steinmetz is an officer of 104 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. |
| |
Arthur P. Steinmetz, Trustee (since 2015), President and Principal Executive Officer (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1958 | | Chairman of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (since January 2015); CEO and Chairman of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since July 2014), President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since May 2013), a Director of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since January 2013), Director of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (since July 2014), President, Management Director and CEO of Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp. (OppenheimerFunds, Inc.‘s parent holding company) (since July 2014), and President and Director of OFI SteelPath, Inc. (since January 2013). Chief Investment Officer of the OppenheimerFunds advisory entities from (January 2013-December 2013); Executive Vice President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (January 2013-May 2013); Chief Investment Officer of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (October 2010-December 2012); Chief Investment Officer, Fixed-Income, of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (April 2009-October 2010); Executive Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (October 2009-December 2012); Director of Fixed Income of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (January 2009-April 2009); and a Senior Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (March 1993-September 2009). |
| | |
OTHER OFFICERS OF THE FUND | | The addresses of the Officers in the chart below are as follows: for Messrs. Cottier, Willis, DeMitry, Camarella, Pulire, Stein, Mss. Lo Bessette, Foxson and Picciotto, 225 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10281-1008, for Mr. Petersen, 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924. Each Officer serves for an indefinite term or until his or her resignation, retirement, death or removal. |
| |
Scott S. Cottier, Vice President (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1971 | | Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since January 2017) and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since September 2002). Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (September 2002-January 2017). Portfolio Manager and trader at Victory Capital Management (1999-2002). Team Leader, a Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
|
58 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | |
Troy E. Willis, Vice President (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1972 | | Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since January 2017) and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since January 2006); Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2009-January 2017); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2005- June 2009). Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (June 2002-December 2005). Corporate Attorney for Southern Resource Group (June 1999-July 2001). Team Leader, a Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Mark R. DeMitry, Vice President (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1976 | | Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since July 2009); Associate Portfolio Manager of the Fund (September 2006- June 2009). Research Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (June 2003-September 2006) and a Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (July 2001-May 2003). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Michael L. Camarella, Vice President (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1976 | | Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since January 2011); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2009-December 2010); Associate Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (January 2008-December 2010). Research Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (April 2006-December 2007) and a Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (June 2003-March 2006). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Charles S. Pulire, Vice President (since 2011) Year of Birth: 1977 | | Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since February 2013); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (December 2010-January 2013); Research Analyst of the Manager (February 2008-November 2010); Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (May 2006-January 2008). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Elizabeth S. Mossow, Vice President (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1978 | | Senior Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (since January 2017); Vice President and Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (January 2016-January 2017); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (January 2011-January 2016); Associate Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (June 2013-January 2016); Portfolio Research Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (June 2011 to June 2013); Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (May 2007 to May 2011). She was a Risk Management Analyst at Manning & Napier Associates (September 2006-May 2007); Analyst/Trading Assistant at The Baupost Group (August 2000-March 2006). Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Richard A. Stein, Vice President (since 2007) Year of Birth: 1957 | | Director of the Rochester Credit Analysis team (since March 2004); Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since June 2011) and a Vice President of the Sub- Adviser (November 1997-May 2011); heads up the Rochester Credit Analysis team (since May 1993). |
|
59 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited / Continued
| | |
Cynthia Lo Bessette, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1969 | | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since February 2016); Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (March 2015-February 2016); Chief Legal Officer of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. and OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (since February 2016); Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp. (since February 2016); General Counsel of OFI SteelPath, Inc., OFI Advisors, LLC and Index Management Solutions, LLC (since February 2016); Chief Legal Officer of OFI Global Institutional, Inc., HarbourView Asset Management Corporation, OFI Global Trust Company, Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc., OFI Private Investments Inc., Shareholder Services, Inc. and Trinity Investment Management Corporation (since February 2016); Corporate Counsel (February 2012-March 2015) and Deputy Chief Legal Officer (April 2013-March 2015) of Jennison Associates LLC; Assistant General Counsel (April 2008-September 2009) and Deputy General Counsel (October 2009-February 2012) of Lord Abbett & Co. LLC. |
| |
Jennifer Foxson, Vice President and Chief Business Officer (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1969 | | Senior Vice President of OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (since June 2014); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (April 2006-June 2014); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (January 1998-March 2006); Assistant Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (October 1991-December 1998). |
| |
Mary Ann Picciotto, Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Anti-Money Laundering Officer (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1973 | | Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since March 2014); Chief Compliance Officer of OppenheimerFunds, Inc., OFI SteelPath, Inc., OFI Global Institutional, Inc., Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc., OFI Private Investments Inc., Harborview Asset Management Corporation, Trinity Investment Management Corporation, and Shareholder Services, Inc. (since March 2014); Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. and certain of its various affiliated entities; Chief Compliance Officer of various Morgan Stanley Funds (May 2010-January 2014); Chief Compliance Officer of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. (April 2007-January 2014). |
| |
Brian S. Petersen, Treasurer and Principal Financial & Accounting Officer (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1970 | | Senior Vice President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since January 2017); Vice President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (January 2013-January 2017); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (February 2007-December 2012); Assistant Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (August 2002-2007). |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers and is available without charge upon request by calling 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677).
|
60 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND
| | |
Manager | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
| |
Sub-Adviser | | OppenheimerFunds, Inc. |
| |
Distributor | | OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. |
| |
Transfer and Shareholder | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
Servicing Agent | | |
| |
Sub-Transfer Agent | | Shareholder Services, Inc. |
| | DBA OppenheimerFunds Services |
| |
Independent Registered | | KPMG LLP |
Public Accounting Firm | | |
© 2018 OppenheimerFunds, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
61 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
PRIVACY NOTICE
As an Oppenheimer fund shareholder, you are entitled to know how we protect your personal information and how we limit its disclosure.
Information Sources
We obtain non-public personal information about our shareholders from the following sources:
● | | Applications or other forms. |
● | | When you create a user ID and password for online account access. |
● | | When you enroll in eDocs Direct,SM our electronic document delivery service. |
● | | Your transactions with us, our affiliates or others. |
● | | Technologies on our website, including: “cookies” and web beacons, which are used to collect data on the pages you visit and the features you use. |
If you visit oppenheimerfunds.com and do not log on to the secure account information areas, we do not obtain any personal information about you. When you do log on to a secure area, we do obtain your user ID and password to identify you. We also use this information to provide you with products and services you have requested, to inform you about products and services that you may be interested in and assist you in other ways.
We do not collect personal information through our website unless you willingly provide it to us, either directly by email or in those areas of the website that request information. In order to update your personal information (including your mailing address, email address and phone number) you must first log on and visit your user profile.
If you have set your browser to warn you before accepting cookies, you will receive the warning message with each cookie. You can refuse cookies by turning them off in your browser. However, doing so may limit your access to certain sections of our website.
We use cookies to help us improve and manage our website. For example, cookies help us recognize new versus repeat visitors to the site, track the pages visited, and enable some special features on the website. This data helps us provide better service for our website visitors.
Protection of Information
We do not disclose any non-public personal information (such as names on a customer list) about current or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law.
Disclosure of Information
Copies of confirmations, account statements and other documents reporting activity in your fund accounts are made available to your financial advisor (as designated by you). We may also use details about you and your investments to help us, our financial service affiliates, or firms that jointly market their financial products and services with ours, to better serve your investment needs or suggest educational material that may be of interest to you. If this requires us to provide you with an opportunity to “opt in” or “opt out” of such information sharing with a firm not affiliated with us, you will receive notification on how to do so, before any such sharing takes place.
Right of Refusal
We will not disclose your personal information to unaffiliated third parties (except as permitted by law), unless we first offer you a reasonable opportunity to refuse or “opt out” of such disclosure.
|
62 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
Internet Security and Encryption
In general, the email services provided by our website are encrypted and provide a secure and private means of communication with us. To protect your own privacy, confidential and/ or personal information should only be communicated via email when you are advised that you are using a secure website.
As a security measure, we do not include personal or account information in non-secure emails, and we advise you not to send such information to us in non-secure emails. Instead, you may take advantage of the secure features of our website to encrypt your email correspondence. To do this, you will need to use a browser that supports Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol.
● | | All transactions conducted via our websites, including redemptions, exchanges and purchases, are secured by the highest encryption standards available. SSL is used to establish a secure connection between your PC and OppenheimerFunds’ server. It transmits information in an encrypted and scrambled format. |
● | | Encryption is achieved through an electronic scrambling technology that uses a “key” to code and then decode the data. Encryption acts like the cable converter box you may have on your television set. It scrambles data with a secret code so that no one can make sense of it while it is being transmitted. When the data reaches its destination, the same software unscrambles the data. |
● | | You can exit the secure area by closing your browser or, for added security, you can use the Log Out button before you close your browser. |
Other Security Measures
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your personal account information. Our employees and agents have access to that information only so that they may offer you products or provide services, for example, when responding to your account questions.
How You Can Help
You can also do your part to keep your account information private and to prevent unauthorized transactions. If you obtain a user ID and password for your account, safeguard that information. Strengthening your online credentials–your online security profile–typically your user name, password, and security questions and answers, can be one of your most important lines of defense on the Internet. For additional information on how you can help prevent identity theft, visit https://www. oppenheimerfunds.com/security.
Who We Are
This joint notice describes the privacy policies of the Oppenheimer funds, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., each of its investment adviser subsidiaries, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. and OFI Global Trust Co. It applies to all Oppenheimer fund accounts you presently have, or may open in the future, using your Social Security number—whether or not you remain a shareholder of our funds. This notice was last updated as of November 2017. In the event it is updated or changed, we will post an updated notice on our website at oppenheimerfunds.com. If you have any questions about this privacy policy, email us by clicking on the Contact Us section of our website at oppenheimerfunds.com, write to us at P.O. Box 5270, Denver, CO 80217-5270, or call us at 800 CALL OPP (225 5677).
|
63 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER NEW JERSEY MUNICIPAL FUND |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g540871dsp64a.jpg)
OppenheimerFunds®
The Right Way
to Invest
Visit us at oppenheimerfunds.com for 24-hr access to account information and transactions or call us at 800.CALL OPP (800.225.5677) for 24-hr automated information and automated transactions. Representatives also available
Mon–Fri 8am-8pm ET.
| | |
Visit Us oppenheimerfunds.com Call Us 800 225 5677 | | |
Follow Us ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g540871dsp64b.jpg)
| | Oppenheimer funds are distributed by OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. 225 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10281-1008 © 2018 OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. All rights reserved. RA0395.001.0718 September 27, 2018 |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g590605dsp01.jpg)
Table of Contents
Class A Shares
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS AT 7/31/18
| | | | | | |
| | Class A Shares of the Fund | | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | With Sales Charge | | Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index |
1-Year | | 3.84% | | -1.10% | | 0.99% |
5-Year | | 5.22 | | 4.20 | | 3.76 |
10-Year | | 5.21 | | 4.69 | | 4.41 |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and a 4.75% maximum applicable sales charge except where “without sales charge” is indicated. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investment. Returns for periods of less than one year are cumulative and not annualized. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). See Fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses for more information on share classes and sales charges.
Our Twitter handle is @RochesterFunds.
|
2 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Fund Performance Discussion
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund once again generated high levels of tax-free income during the 12-month reporting period that ended July 31, 2018. The Class A shares provided a yield-driven, annual total return of 3.84% at net asset value (NAV) and a distribution yield of 3.47% at NAV. The Fund outperformed the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, its benchmark, by 285 basis points. Tax-free income comprised 100% of this fund’s total return this reporting period, further evidence supporting our focus on yield as the long-term driver of Fund performance.
MARKET OVERVIEW
The first quarter-point increase of this reporting period was announced after the FOMC’s December 2017 meeting. The rate was also raised in March and June 2018. The Fed Funds target rate remained unchanged at its July meeting. The FOMC’s policy statement issued after that meeting repeatedly referred to the economy and labor markets as “strong” and signaled that subsequent rate rises will be needed to keep the economy steady. A majority of officials at the July meeting suggested at least two more rate increases this year.
The average distribution yield in Lipper’s Pennsylvania Debt Funds category was 3.24% at the end of this reporting period. At 3.47%, the distribution yield at NAV for this Fund’s Class A shares was 23 basis points higher than the category average.
The target range, which was set to the range of zero to 0.25% between December 2008 and December 2015, has had six increases of 0.25 percentage points to date.
| | | | |
YIELDS & DISTRIBUTIONS FOR CLASS A SHARES | | | | |
Dividend Yield w/o sales charge | | | 3.47% | |
Dividend Yield with sales charge | | | 3.30 | |
Standardized Yield | | | 2.65 | |
Taxable Equivalent Yield | | | 4.63 | |
Last distribution (7/24/18) | | $ | 0.030 | |
Total distributions (8/1/17 to 7/31/18) | | $ | 0.420 | |
Endnotes for this discussion begin on page 14 of this report.
|
3 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
The Fed’s efforts to “normalize” its balance sheet, which began in October 2017 with reductions of $10 billion a month, continued throughout this reporting period. The Fed has said that it expects reductions to reach $50 billion a month by year-end 2018.
During this reporting period, the muni market’s reactions to the Fed’s announcements did not appear to be especially significant or lasting.
In December 2017, President Donald J. Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The top federal income tax rate for 2018 was lowered to 37%, from 39.6%. Although it had been targeted for elimination, the federal tax exemption on the net investment income generated by muni bonds and muni bond funds remained intact. Additionally, this income will continue to be exempt from the 3.8% tax on unearned income that applies to the income generated by investments in other asset classes.
At the end of this reporting period, the ICE BofA Merrill Lynch AAA Municipal Securities Index – the AAA subset of the broader ICE BofA Merrill Lynch US Municipal Securities Index – yielded 2.41%, 66 basis points higher than at the reporting period’s outset.
The high-grade muni yield curve as a whole rose during this reporting period, though yields at the short end of the curve rose more than yields on securities with maturities of 10 years or longer. The rise in the Treasury curve was also greater at the short end of the
curve. The Treasury curve continued to flatten during this reporting period, giving investors in government securities fewer incentives to purchase longer-maturity bonds; a flatter curve typically reflects an expectation of rising rates. The muni yield curve remained relatively flat as of July 31, 2018; it was somewhat steeper at the outset of this reporting period than at the end. As a result of the changes in the two yield curves, as of end of July, 30-year AAA-rated munis were considered cheap to 30-year Treasuries.
On a nominal basis, Treasury yields were higher than the yields on AAA-rated munis with comparable maturities as of July 31, 2018. Nonetheless, a AAA-rated muni with a maturity of 10 years would provide more income on an after-tax basis than a 10-year Treasury security for Philadelphia taxpayers in all but the lowest 2018 tax bracket; everywhere else in Pennsylvania, the muni would provide more after-tax income than the Treasury in all but the two lowest 2018 federal tax brackets. (Philadelphia levies a city income tax rate of 3.89%, which makes a municipal bond’s after-tax income advantage even more pronounced.) The yields on the 30-year Treasury and AAA-rated muni were virtually identical at the end of this reporting period, meaning that nearly every taxpayer would earn more on an after-tax basis by investing in the muni versus the Treasury. Treasury bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, while municipal securities are exempt from federal income taxes and, where applicable, state and local income taxes as well.
|
4 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
This reporting period was also characterized by credit spread tightening, which occurs when the difference between yields on low-rated municipal bonds and higher-rated bonds decreases. As credit spreads tighten, investments in lower-rated and unrated securities typically outperform municipal securities with higher credit ratings.
Pennsylvania’s governor, Tom Wolf, signed a $32.7 billion fiscal 2019 spending plan in June 2018, his first on-time budget package since taking office in January 2015. Commonwealth officials said they achieved $100 million in annual savings from procurement efficiencies, contract renewal reductions, and live, reverse auctions for contracts. The governor also introduced initiatives designed to create recurring savings of $2.2 billion, among them: downsizing facilities, consolidating agencies, and merging human resources and internet technology across all state agencies. Gov. Wolf also announced a $22 million deposit into the state’s rainy-day fund, exceeding pre-budget estimates by $8 million. The governor expects this deposit, the first in nearly a decade, to resonate with bond rating agencies.
The ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in South Dakota vs. Wayfair requiring certain online retailers to collect taxes will likely bolster the legality of the Marketplace Sales Act, which the Legislature passed as part of the 2017-2018 budget, according to The Allentown Morning Call. The Act will require companies that sell at least $10,000 of merchandise annually to Pennsylvania residents via a
website or online retail platform to collect and remit sales taxes. The taxes could be collected at the point of sale or retailers could send annual tax notices to their customers and to the Pennsylvania Revenue Department. In 2020, taxpayers would need to report these taxes on their tax returns. The Morning Call also reported that online sales to Pennsylvanians are forecast to generate more than $40 million in revenues annually.
Pennsylvania came to market in May 2018 with $1.2 billion of general obligation (G.O.) bonds. Proceeds will fund Growing Greener Projects, a program that includes a variety of sustainable initiatives; the Pennsylvania Infrastructure Investment Authority (Pennvest); and various capital facilities projects.
While the future of Philadelphia’s beverage tax is being argued in the State Supreme Court, Mayor Jim Kenney has requested that the city move forward with planned capital enhancements funded by the controversial policy and already approved in the city’s 2018 fiscal budget. Revenues from the 1.5 cent-per-ounce tax on sugary beverages, which went into effect January 2017, are slated to fund the majority of Philadelphia’s Rebuilding Community Infrastructure initiative to make capital improvements to parks, recreation centers, and libraries. Construction on several projects is set to start later in 2018, and the city has plans to initiate a larger set if the beverage tax is upheld by the State Supreme Court.
|
5 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Pittsburgh has terminated its status as a distressed municipality after 14 years under the state’s Act 47 program, which provides fiscal management oversight, technical assistance, planning, and financial aid to municipalities experiencing severe fiscal distress. Boosted by a recent surge in the city’s technology and medical sectors, stabilized finances, and healthy surpluses, Pittsburgh is the second city and 14th municipality to exit the program.
As of July 31, 2018, Pennsylvania’s G.O. bonds were rated Aa3 with a stable outlook by Moody’s Investors Service, A-plus with a stable outlook by S&P Global Ratings (S&P), and AA-minus with a negative outlook by Fitch Ratings. G.O.s are backed by the full faith and taxing authority of the state or local government that issues them.
The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the federal oversight board established by PROMESA (the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act) continued to generate headlines throughout this reporting period; additional information about the developments in Puerto Rico can be found on our online PR Roundup (oppenheimerfunds.com/puerto-rico).
At the end of this reporting period, some 10 months after Hurricane Maria, power was not fully restored across the Commonwealth. Despite the hurricane’s impact during the final quarter of 2017, Puerto Rico’s retail sales rose 10.7% in 2017, and bonds issued by the
Commonwealth (in aggregate) have rallied during this reporting period.
PREPA, the Commonwealth’s energy utilities authority, remained a focal point during this reporting period. In January 2018, creditors raised concerns about a plan to loan $1.3 billion to PREPA and the government’s proposal to privatize PREPA, among other issues; in a decision favorable to bondholders, U.S. District Court Judge Laura Taylor Swain rejected the proposed loan. Investors will recall that PREPA failed to make its July 2017 debt payment and has made no debt-service payments since. Its cash on hand continues to be more than projected, according to officials in Puerto Rico.
In July 2018, a board shakeup ensued after Gov. Ricardo Rosselló Nevares appointed Rafael Diaz-Granados as PREPA’s new executive director, replacing Walter Higgins, who held the position for four months. Diaz-Granados quit after one day over a pay dispute, and four other board members also resigned in protest. Jose Ortiz, who had previously led PRASA, the Commonwealth’s aqueduct and sewer authority, returned to PREPA; he had been the board’s chairman from 2011 to 2013. Ortiz became the fifth person to lead PREPA since the hurricane hit.
Ortiz has expressed interest in selling some of PREPA’s power plants. The governor remains an advocate for privatization, a solution that typically requires assumption of debt. He has also said the federal government is not qualified to take over the utility and has asked
|
6 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Congress to provide PREPA with $30 billion for modernization efforts.
At the very end of this reporting period, the oversight board established under PROMESA, the government of Puerto Rico, and certain bondholders, including OppenheimerFunds, reached a new restructuring support agreement (RSA) for PREPA debt. The pact, which has not been finalized, comes 13 months after the oversight board voted against an RSA that had been reached in September 2015 and extended numerous times. Like the earlier RSA, the new agreement is designed to reduce PREPA’s debt burden and protect the best interests of Fund shareholders.
As anticipated, Hurricane Maria had an adverse impact on sales and use tax (SUT) collections during fiscal year 2018, which ended June 30. At $2.52 billion for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, SUT collections were 1.2% lower than in the previous fiscal year. The ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in South Dakota vs. Wayfair is expected to increase Puerto Rico’s sales tax collections by an estimated $40 million annually, according to Puerto Rico’s Treasury Department.
Prices on many bonds issued in Puerto Rico rose materially on news of an agreement between an agent of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and an agent of the COFINA bondholders. Negotiations are ongoing and many details need to be worked out, but a preliminary structure for a settlement was reached in mid-June 2018. Judge Swain has
approved the segregating SUT collections into three separate pools, as stipulated in the agreement. Among other provisions, the agreement calls for bondholders to receive the $1.2 billion in unpaid debt service that the Bank of New York-Mellon, the COFINA trustee, has amassed. Very early in this reporting period, the Commonwealth said its deposits with the BoNY trustee had already satisfied its fiscal 2018 requirements related to the COFINA debt.
Puerto Rico did not make debt payments on its G.O. securities during this reporting period, despite a requirement in the Commonwealth’s Constitution that general fund revenues be used to pay G.O. debt service ahead of any other government expense. The legal protections for our G.O. holdings have not yet been tested before a court.
In June 2018, officials in the Commonwealth’s Treasury Department said that general fund revenues for the first 11 months of fiscal year 2018 were $78.9 million, or 1%, ahead of projections. Treasury officials also said then that they anticipate that revenues for the entire fiscal year will also exceed projections, but those figures had not been released as of July 31, 2018.
On the last day of the reporting period, the government reported that Puerto Rico’s latest cash position had reached its highest level in at least a year: As of July 20, 2018, Puerto Rico had $3.23 billion in cash, topping the high point of fiscal 2018 by more than $100 million.
|
7 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
In other positive economic news, the employment level in June was higher than at any time since October 2013. At 9.3%, the unemployment rate remained high relative to the U.S. rate, but was nonetheless the lowest monthly rate since at least 1975, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Puerto Rico’s Department of Labor and Human Resources, meanwhile, says the annual rate is the lowest since at least 1941.
During the reporting period, the oversight board, the Rosselló administration, legislators, and owners of Puerto Rico debt remained at odds about the extent of the board’s authority, with significant debate about the budget and fiscal plan proposals that have been drafted and repeatedly revised. While it intended to certify a plan by late March, the oversight board extended the deadline and said that the new plan must demonstrate “consistency with historical actual expenditures.”
In April, the projected surplus by fiscal 2023 was raised to $6.4 billion and then to $6.7 billion. Audited results for fiscal 2015 were released in the final months of this reporting period; audited results for fiscal years 2016 and 2017 have yet to be released.
Among the ongoing issues are debt-service obligations, pensions, Law 80 (the repeal of which would allow at-will employment), and Christmas bonuses for public sector employees.
In the latter half of this reporting period, the chairman of the U.S. House committee that oversees Puerto Rico sent the governor a letter that recommended the takeover of the Commonwealth’s government by the oversight board and an increased focus on bondholder concerns. The governor fired back, calling the chairman’s letter “truly disturbing in its reckless disregard for collaboration and cooperation.”
On June 30, 2018, the oversight board certified a budget for Puerto Rico, allocating $8.76 billion for the general fund and $20.7 billion for the consolidated budget. The next month, both the governor and legislative leaders filed lawsuits claiming that the oversight board was overstepping its authority. These suits followed the board’s rejection of the budget that the Legislature had passed. The oversight board cited the PROMESA provisions that allow it to impose its own budget if the government does not submit a compliant budget; government officials, meanwhile, argue that the board is trying to set public policy.
Clearly, the situation remains dynamic. All issuers can be affected positively or adversely by economic and fiscal conditions: were the economic situation in Puerto Rico to worsen, for example, then the performance of Rochester municipal funds that hold Puerto Rican debt, including this Fund, may be adversely affected. Our team continues to believe that the best interests of all stakeholders can be met through negotiated settlements that offer Puerto Rico a path
|
8 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
forward, strengthen its economy and improve the quality of life of its residents while providing investors with an appropriate return.
FUND PERFORMANCE
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund held more than 250 securities as of July 31, 2018. The Fund was invested in a broad range of sectors, providing shareholders with a diversity of holdings that we believe would be difficult and costly to replicate in an individual portfolio.
During this reporting period, a rally in U.S. equities and persistent low interest rates put pressure on the dividends of many fixed income investments. This Fund’s Class A dividend, which was 4.2 cents per share at the outset, was reduced several times over the reporting period, ending at 3.0 cents per share beginning with the June 2018 payout. In all, the Fund distributed 42.0 cents per Class A share this reporting period. Shareholders should note that market conditions during this reporting period did not affect the Fund’s overall investment goals or cause it to pay any capital gain distributions.
Seven of the Fund’s 10 largest sectors were among the 10 strongest sectors this reporting period. The Fund’s performance this reporting period was primarily driven by its holdings of sales tax revenue. Debt-service payments on securities in this sector, almost all of which were issued in Puerto Rico and one issued in the US Virgin Islands, are paid using the
issuing municipality’s sales tax revenue. Securities in tobacco bonds were the second strongest performer this reporting period.
These high-yielding bonds, which are backed by proceeds from the landmark 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), were the Fund’s third largest sector as of July 31, 2018. The Fund’s first, second, fifth, eighth, and ninth-largest sectors (education, higher education, US government obligations, student housing, and highways/commuter facilities, respectively) were also ranked among the 10 best-performing sectors.
Research-based security selection continued to be a factor in the strong performance of these sectors. The investment-grade bonds we hold in the higher education sector, five of which were invested in Puerto Rico, have regularly provided high levels of tax-free income with what we believe to be far less credit risk than their external ratings would suggest. This sector was the Fund’s third strongest contributor to performance.
Bonds in the education sector, the Fund’s fourth strongest performer and largest sector overall this reporting period, primarily finance the infrastructure needs of a variety of charter schools around the state. The U.S. Government Obligations sector, the Fund’s fifth strongest performer, includes any securities held by the Fund that have been pre-refunded. In a refunding, new securities with lower coupon rates are sold by a municipality to pay off debt that has higher interest rates; the proceeds are escrowed in
|
9 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
U.S. Treasury bonds and earmarked to pay off the previously issued bonds. The student housing sector, which was the sixth strongest this reporting period, tends to perform well because the nation’s colleges and universities typically have predictable student populations and thus accurate revenue forecasts. The highway/commuter facilities sector was the Fund’s tenth strongest performer this reporting period. Bonds in this sector are used to build and maintain roadways and highway amenities.
Three sectors detracted slightly from the Fund’s performance this reporting period, though in aggregate performance was reduced less than 1.5 percentage point by the underperforming sectors. The detractors as of July 31, 2018, includes G.O. bonds (the Fund’s fourth largest), as well as municipal leases, and electric utilities. These sectors were adversely affected by developments in Puerto Rico, as discussed above.
The Fund’s investments in securities issued in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are exempt from federal, state, and local income taxes, and the Fund’s holdings as of July 31, 2018 included securities from many different sectors. Investors should note that some of this Fund’s investments in securities issued in
Puerto Rico are insured. A complete listing of securities held by this Fund can be found in this report’s Statement of Investments.
INVESTMENT STRATEGY
The Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Management Team focuses exclusively on municipal bonds, and this Fund invests primarily in investment-grade municipal securities. It may invest up to 25% of its total assets in below-investment grade securities, or “junk” bonds; the percentage of assets is measured at the time of purchase as is the credit quality of the securities. Additionally, the credit quality is based on Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (“NRSRO”) ratings or, if no NRSRO rating, on internal ratings. As of July 31, 2018, market movements or rating changes of municipal bonds, notably the Fund’s investments in Puerto Rico paper, caused the Fund’s below-investment-grade holdings to exceed this threshold. As a result, no further purchases of below-investment-grade bonds will be made until the Fund’s holdings of these types of bonds is once again below 25% of total assets.
In closing, we believe that the structure and sector composition of this Fund and the use of time-tested strategies will continue to
|
10 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
benefit fixed income investors through
interest rate and economic cycles.
| | | | |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g590605dsp11a.jpg) | | ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g590605dsp11b.jpg) | | |
| Charles S. Pulire, CFA Vice President and Senior Portfolio Manager | | |
Charlie Pulire has been named portfolio manager of the Fund. With support as needed from the Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Management Team, Charlie will continue to adhere to a consistent investment approach based on the belief that tax-free yield can help investors achieve their long-term financial objectives even when market conditions fluctuate. The Fund will not be managed based on predictions of interest rate changes. In closing, we believe that the structure and sector composition of this Fund and the use of time-tested strategies will continue to benefit fixed income investors through interest rate and economic cycles.
|
11 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Top Holdings and Allocations
TOP TEN CATEGORIES
| | | | |
Education | | | 13.6 | % |
Higher Education | | | 12.6 | |
Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement | | | 11.6 | |
General Obligation | | | 9.4 | |
U.S. Government Obligations | | | 8.7 | |
Hospital/Healthcare | | | 5.7 | |
Sales Tax Revenue | | | 5.4 | |
Housing - Student | | | 5.2 | |
Highways/Commuter Facilities | | | 4.8 | |
Government Appropriation | | | 3.7 | |
Portfolio holdings are subject to change. Percentages are as of July 31, 2018 and are based on total assets.
CREDIT ALLOCATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | NRSRO- Rated | | | Sub- Adviser- Rated | | | Total | |
AAA | | | 0.0% | | | | 2.5% | | | | 2.5% | |
AA | | | 16.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 16.4 | |
A | | | 29.5 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 29.5 | |
BBB | | | 17.7 | | | | 3.2 | | | | 20.9 | |
BB or lower | | | 20.6 | | | | 10.1 | | | | 30.7 | |
Total | | | 84.2% | | | | 15.8% | | | | 100.0% | |
The percentages above are based on the market value of the securities as of July 31, 2018 and are subject to change. OppenheimerFunds, Inc. determines the credit allocation of the Fund’s assets using ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs), such as S&P Global Ratings (S&P). For any security rated by an NRSRO other than S&P, the sub-adviser, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., converts that security’s rating to the equivalent S&P rating. If two or more NRSROs have assigned a rating to a security, the highest rating is used. For securities not rated by an NRSRO, the sub-adviser uses its own credit analysis to assign ratings in categories similar to those of S&P. The use of similar categories is not an indication that the sub-adviser’s credit analysis process is consistent or comparable with any NRSRO’s process were that NRSRO to rate the same security.
For the purposes of this Credit Allocation table, securities rated within the NRSROs’ four highest categories—AAA, AA, A, and BBB—are investment-grade securities. For further details, please consult the Fund’s prospectus or Statement of Additional Information.
|
12 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Performance
DISTRIBUTION YIELDS
As of 7/31/18
| | | | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | With Sales Charge |
Class A | | 3.47% | | 3.30% |
Class C | | 2.87 | | N/A |
Class Y | | 3.69 | | N/A |
TAXABLE EQUIVALENT YIELDS
| | | | |
As of 7/31/18 | | | | |
Class A | | 4.63% | | |
Class C | | 3.72 | | |
Class Y | | 5.27 | | |
STANDARDIZED YIELDS
| | | | |
For the 30 Days Ended 7/31/18 | | | | |
Class A | | 2.65% | | |
Class C | | 2.13 | | |
Class Y | | 3.02 | | |
UNSUBSIDIZED STANDARDIZED YIELDS
| | | | |
For the 30 Days Ended 7/31/18 |
Class A | | 2.64% | | |
Class C | | 2.13 | | |
Class Y | | 3.02 | | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITHOUT SALES CHARGE AS OF 7/31/18
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Inception Date | | 1-Year | | 5-Year | | 10-Year | | Since Inception |
Class A (OPATX) | | 9/18/89 | | 3.84% | | 5.22% | | 5.21% | | 5.57% |
Class C (OPACX) | | 8/29/95 | | 3.07 | | 4.45 | | 4.42 | | 4.33 |
Class Y (OPAYX) | | 11/29/10 | | 3.98 | | 5.40 | | N/A | | 5.47 |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITH SALES CHARGE AS OF 7/31/18
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Inception Date | | 1-Year | | 5-Year | | 10-Year | | Since Inception |
Class A (OPATX) | | 9/18/89 | | -1.10% | | 4.20% | | 4.69% | | 5.40% |
Class C (OPACX) | | 8/29/95 | | 2.08 | | 4.45 | | 4.42 | | 4.33 |
Class Y (OPAYX) | | 11/29/10 | | 3.98 | | 5.40 | | N/A | | 5.47 |
|
13 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
COMPARISON OF CHANGE IN VALUE OF $10,000 HYPOTHETICAL INVESTMENTS IN:
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g590605dsp14.jpg)
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investments. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800. CALL OPP (225.5677). Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and the applicable sales charge: for Class A shares, the current maximum initial sales charge of 4.75%; for Class C, the contingent deferred sales charge of 1% for the 1-year period. There is no sales charge for Class Y shares.
The Fund’s performance is compared to the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, an index of a broad range of investment-grade municipal bonds that measures the performance of the general municipal bond market. The Fund’s performance is also compared to the Consumer Price Index, a non-securities index that measures changes in the inflation rate. Indices are unmanaged and cannot be purchased by investors. While index comparisons may be useful to provide a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, it must be noted that the Fund’s investments are not limited to the investments comprising the index. Index performance includes reinvestment of income, but does not reflect transaction costs, fees, expenses, or taxes. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only as a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, and does not predict or depict performance of the Fund. The Fund’s performance reflects the effects of the Fund’s business and operating expenses.
Distribution yields for Class A shares are based on dividends of $0.030 for the 28-day accrual period ended July 24, 2018. The yield without sales charge for Class A shares is calculated by dividing annualized dividends by the Class A net asset value (NAV) on July 24, 2018; for the yield with charge, the denominator is the Class A maximum offering price on that date. Distribution yields for Class C and Y are annualized based on dividends of $0.0248 and $0.0319, respectively, for the 28-day accrual period ended July 24, 2018 and on the corresponding net asset values on that date.
|
14 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Standardized yield is based on an SEC-standardized formula designed to approximate the Fund’s annualized hypothetical current income from securities less expenses for the 30-day period ended July 31, 2018 and that date’s maximum offering price (for Class A shares) or net asset value (for all other share classes). Each result is compounded semiannually and then annualized. Falling share prices will tend to artificially raise yields. The unsubsidized standardized yield is computed under an SEC-standardized formula based on net income earned for the 30-day period ended July 31, 2018. The calculation excludes any expense reimbursements and thus may result in a lower yield.
The average distribution yield in this Fund’s Lipper category was calculated based on the distributions and the final NAVs of the reporting period for the funds in each category. The average yield at NAV in Lipper’s Pennsylvania Municipal Debt Funds category is based on 60 NAVs, one for each class of each fund in the category; a fund can have up to 4 classes. Lipper yields do not include sales charges, which – if included – would reduce results.
Taxable equivalent yield is based on the standardized yield and the 2018 top federal and Pennsylvania tax rate of 42.73%. Calculations factor in the 3.8% tax on unearned income under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as applicable. A portion of the Fund’s distributions may be subject to tax; distributions may also increase an investor’s exposure to the alternative minimum tax. Capital gains distributions are taxable as capital gains. Tax treatments of the Fund’s distributions and capital gains may vary by state; investors should consult a tax advisor to determine if the Fund is appropriate for them. Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields. This Report must be preceded or accompanied by a Fund prospectus.
Investments in “tobacco bonds,” which are backed by the proceeds a state or territory receives from the 1998 national litigation settlement with tobacco manufacturers, may be vulnerable to economic and/or legislative events that affect issuers in a particular municipal market sector. Annual payments by MSA-participating manufacturers, for example, hinge on many factors, including annual domestic cigarette shipments, inflation and the relative market share of non-participating manufacturers. To date, we believe consumption figures remain within an acceptable range of the assumptions used to structure MSA bonds. Future MSA payments could be reduced if consumption were to fall more rapidly than originally forecast.
The ICE BofA Merrill Lynch AAA Municipal Securities index is the AAA subset of the ICE BofA Merrill Lynch US Municipal Securities Index, which tracks the performance of dollar-denominated, investment-grade, tax-exempt debt issued by U.S. states and territories and their political subdivisions; index constituents are weighted based on capitalization, and accrued interest is calculated assuming next-day settlement.
The views in the Fund Performance Discussion represent the opinions of this Fund’s portfolio managers and are not intended as investment advice or to predict or depict the performance of any investment. These views are as of the close of business on July 31, 2018, and are subject to change based on subsequent developments. The Fund’s portfolio and strategies are subject to change.
Before investing in any of the Oppenheimer funds, investors should carefully consider a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses contain this and other information about the funds, and may be obtained by asking your financial advisor, visiting
|
15 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
oppenheimerfunds.com, or calling 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). Read prospectuses and summary prospectuses carefully before investing.
Shares of Oppenheimer funds are not deposits or obligations of any bank, are not guaranteed by any bank, are not insured by the FDIC or any other agency, and involve investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested.
|
16 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Fund Expenses
Fund Expenses. As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, which may include sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and/or contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service fees; and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples are based on an investment of $1,000.00 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire 6-month period ended July 31, 2018.
Actual Expenses. The first section of the table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section for the class of shares you hold, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expense that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000.00 (for example, an $8,600.00 account value divided by $1,000.00 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended July 31, 2018” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes. The second section of the table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio for each class of shares, and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year for each class before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example for the class of shares you hold with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as front-end or contingent deferred sales charges (loads). Therefore, the “hypothetical” section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
17 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | |
Actual | | Beginning Account Value February 1, 2018 | | Ending Account Value July 31, 2018 | | Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended July 31, 2018 | | |
Class A | | $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,096.60 | | $ 6.20 | | |
Class C | | 1,000.00 | | 1,093.40 | | 9.64 | | |
Class Y | | 1,000.00 | | 1,097.90 | | 4.95 | | |
| | | |
Hypothetical (5% return before expenses) | | | | | | |
Class A | | 1,000.00 | | 1,018.89 | | 5.97 | | |
Class C | | 1,000.00 | | 1,015.62 | | 9.29 | | |
Class Y | | 1,000.00 | | 1,020.08 | | 4.77 | | |
Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for that class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Those annualized expense ratios, excluding indirect expenses from affiliated funds, based on the 6-month period ended July 31, 2018 are as follows:
| | | | |
Class | | Expense Ratios | |
Class A | | | 1.19% | |
Class C | | | 1.85 | |
Class Y | | | 0.95 | |
|
18 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS July 31, 2018
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes—108.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pennsylvania—82.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$11,500,000 | | Allegheny County, PA GO1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | | | | | 11/01/2041 | | | $ | 12,971,770 | |
4,960,000 | | Allegheny County, PA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2043 | | | | 5,646,166 | |
35,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HDA (UPMC Health System)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 08/15/2029 | | | | 36,345 | |
160,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HDA (UPMC Health System)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 08/15/2034 | | | | 166,115 | |
1,075,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Carlow University)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2021 | | | | 1,157,162 | |
1,125,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Carlow University)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 1,294,459 | |
1,000,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Chatham University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2035 | | | | 1,044,160 | |
615,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/15/2037 | | | | 670,824 | |
1,500,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/15/2047 | | | | 1,621,650 | |
2,250,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 10/15/2030 | | | | 2,373,862 | |
3,650,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 10/15/2040 | | | | 3,851,845 | |
2,355,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 5.900 | | | | | | | | 10/15/2028 | | | | 2,376,642 | |
5,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2028 | | | | 5,666 | |
2,000,000 | | Allegheny County, PA HEBA (Robert Morris University)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 10/15/2038 | | | | 2,018,800 | |
1,200,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (Propel Charter School-East)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | | | | | 08/15/2035 | | | | 1,251,828 | |
800,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (Propel Charter School-Montour)1,2 | | | 6.750 | | | | | | | | 08/15/2035 | | | | 840,352 | |
1,500,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (Propel Charter School-Sunrise)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/15/2038 | | | | 1,565,040 | |
820,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (RR/RRSW/RRDC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2021 | | | | 821,812 | |
1,225,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (RR/RRSW/RRDC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.100 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2026 | | | | 1,227,144 | |
530,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (RR/RRSW/RRDC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2031 | | | | 530,514 | |
300,000 | | Allegheny County, PA IDA (School Facility Devel.)1,2 | | | 5.900 | | | | | | | | 08/15/2026 | | | | 313,941 | |
10,760,000 | | Allegheny County, PA Redevel. Authority (Pittsburgh Mills)1 | | | 5.600 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 10,603,550 | |
1,575,000 | | Allegheny County, PA Residential Finance Authority (Broadview Manor Apartments)1 | | | 5.950 | | | | | | | | 01/20/2043 | | | | 1,603,539 | |
1,220,000 | | Allegheny County, PA Residential Finance Authority (Independence House Apartments)1 | | | 6.100 | | | | | | | | 01/20/2043 | | | | 1,244,254 | |
1,580,000 | | Allegheny County, PA Residential Finance Authority (Versailles Apartments)1 | | | 6.160 | | | | | | | | 01/20/2043 | | | | 1,612,817 | |
1,250,000 | | Allentown, PA City School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 1,377,400 | |
1,255,000 | | Allentown, PA City School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2037 | | | | 1,379,295 | |
|
19 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$375,000 | | Berks County, PA IDA (Highlands at Wyomissing Healthcare Facilities)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | | | | | 05/15/2037 | | | $ | 408,619 | |
500,000 | | Berks County, PA IDA (Highlands at Wyomissing Healthcare Facilities)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/15/2042 | | | | 542,490 | |
600,000 | | Berks County, PA IDA (Highlands at Wyomissing Healthcare Facilities)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/15/2047 | | | | 648,666 | |
13,400,000 | | Berks County, PA IDA (THlth/RHosp/BHospital/ CHH/JH/PHospital/PottsH Obligated Group)3 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2047 | | | | 14,792,544 | |
6,500,000 | | Berks County, PA Municipal Authority (Tower Health)3 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 6,791,281 | |
6,500,000 | | Berks County, PA Municipal Authority (Tower Health)3 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 6,788,812 | |
3,000,000 | | Bethlehem, PA Area School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 3,382,230 | |
1,750,000 | | Bethlehem, PA GO1 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 1,975,417 | |
480,000 | | Butler County, PA IDA (Greenview Gardens Apartments)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 480,994 | |
1,760,000 | | Butler County, PA IDA (Greenview Gardens Apartments)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 1,762,693 | |
50,000 | | Butler, PA Area School District1 | | | 4.500 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2022 | | | | 50,261 | |
950,000 | | Centre County, PA Hospital Authority (Mt. Nittany Medical Center)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2041 | | | | 1,082,962 | |
2,000,000 | | Centre County, PA Hospital Authority (Mt. Nittany Medical Center)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2046 | | | | 2,327,540 | |
2,000,000 | | Chester County, PA H&EFA (Main Line Health System)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2052 | | | | 2,223,420 | |
1,000,000 | | Chester County, PA IDA (West Chester University Student Hsg.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 1,063,040 | |
1,000,000 | | Clairton, PA Municipal Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 1,067,620 | |
1,220,000 | | Clarion County, PA IDA (Clarion University Foundation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 1,302,850 | |
1,310,000 | | Clarion County, PA IDA (Clarion University Foundation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2034 | | | | 1,376,234 | |
2,430,000 | | Clarion County, PA IDA (Clarion University of Pennsylvania Hsg.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 2,576,456 | |
3,500,000 | | Clarion County, PA IDA (Clarion University of Pennsylvania Hsg.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 3,688,230 | |
260,000 | | Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority (Diakon Lutheran Social Ministries)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2024 | | | | 264,480 | |
1,000,000 | | Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority (Dickinson College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2031 | | | | 1,140,260 | |
775,000 | | Cumberland County, PA Municipal Authority (Dickinson College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2032 | | | | 880,834 | |
3,965,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Eastern University)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2032 | | | | 3,967,617 | |
1,750,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Elwyn/ElwynNJ/ElwynCA/Family Support Services Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2037 | | | | 1,896,755 | |
75,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (MAS/MCMCSPA/ MHH/MHP/MHSSPA Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2023 | | | | 77,199 | |
|
20 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,160,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann College)1 | | | 6.000 | % | | | | | | | 10/01/2025 | | | $ | 1,168,712 | |
280,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann College)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2030 | | | | 282,103 | |
1,000,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann College)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2034 | | | | 1,007,710 | |
650,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann College)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 655,148 | |
1,150,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2025 | | | | 1,218,896 | |
1,425,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 1,541,508 | |
2,305,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2035 | | | | 2,469,462 | |
1,250,000 | | Delaware County, PA Authority (Neumann University)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 1,300,450 | |
820,000 | | East Hempfield Township, PA IDA (Millersville University Student Services)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 887,076 | |
1,000,000 | | East Hempfield Township, PA IDA (Millersville University Student Services)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 1,068,080 | |
1,060,000 | | East Hempfield Township, PA IDA (Millersville University Student Services)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,131,359 | |
1,250,000 | | East Hempfield Township, PA IDA (Millersville University Student Services)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,321,787 | |
75,000 | | Erie, PA City School District1 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2039 | | | | 75,206 | |
7,840,000 | | Erie, PA Higher Education Building Authority (Gannon University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 8,332,195 | |
1,000,000 | | Erie, PA Higher Education Building Authority (Gannon University)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2030 | | | | 1,040,260 | |
2,565,000 | | Erie, PA Higher Education Building Authority (Gannon University)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2040 | | | | 2,663,009 | |
3,000,000 | | Erie, PA Higher Education Building Authority (Mercyhurst College)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 03/15/2038 | | | | 3,014,940 | |
1,450,000 | | Fayette County, PA Redevel. Authority (Fayette Crossing)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2019 | | | | 1,460,512 | |
2,100,000 | | Lackawanna County, PA GO1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 09/15/2032 | | | | 2,193,429 | |
436,444 | | Lehigh County, PA GPA (Kidspeace Obligated Group)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2018 | | | | 438,215 | |
3,600,000 | | Lehigh County, PA GPA (Kidspeace Obligated Group)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2023 | | | | 3,608,352 | |
2,747,774 | | Lehigh County, PA GPA (Kidspeace)1,4 | | | 0.000 | 5 | | | | | | | 02/01/2044 | | | | 898,440 | |
2,721,970 | | Lehigh County, PA GPA (Kidspeace)4 | | | 7.500 | | | | | | | | 02/01/2044 | | | | 490 | |
3,484,140 | | Lehigh County, PA GPA (Kidspeace/KC/KNCONY/ KCH/KMAKNC/KNCONM/IRSch Obligated Group)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | | | | | 02/01/2044 | | | | 3,484,140 | |
1,525,000 | | Luzerne County, PA GO1 | | | 6.750 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2023 | | | | 1,614,502 | |
500,000 | | Luzerne County, PA GO1 | | | 7.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2026 | | | | 530,880 | |
5,000,000 | | Luzerne County, PA IDA1 | | | 7.750 | | | | | | | | 12/15/2027 | | | | 5,408,300 | |
|
21 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$3,115,000 | | Luzerne County, PA IDA (Pennsylvania-American Water Company)1 | | | 5.500 | % | | | | | | | 12/01/2039 | | | $ | 3,266,607 | |
4,000,000 | | Montgomery County, PA HEHA (Thomas Jefferson University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2048 | | | | 4,448,360 | |
5,425,000 | | Montgomery County, PA IDA (ARLC/LVE/ATI/ ASCS/AMS Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2036 | | | | 5,997,446 | |
300,000 | | Montgomery County, PA IDA (Philadelphia Presbyterian Homes)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2025 | | | | 344,952 | |
4,500,000 | | Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority (Lafayette College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2047 | | | | 5,093,685 | |
2,860,000 | | Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority (Moravian College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 3,058,770 | |
2,250,000 | | Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority (Moravian College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2036 | | | | 2,452,725 | |
7,785,000 | | Northampton County, PA General Purpose Authority (St. Luke’s University Health Network)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | | | | | 08/15/2048 | | | | 7,816,918 | |
1,500,000 | | Northampton County, PA IDA (Morningstar Senior Living)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 1,558,200 | |
14,826,610 | | Northampton County, PA IDA (Northampton Generating)4,6,9 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/31/2023 | | | | 4,447,983 | |
2,697,930 | | Northampton County, PA IDA (Northampton Generating)4,6,9 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/31/2023 | | | | 809,379 | |
16,000,000 | | PA Commonwealth Financing Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2032 | | | | 16,793,120 | |
2,000,000 | | PA Commonwealth Financing Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 2,227,020 | |
4,500,000 | | PA Commonwealth Financing Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 5,029,335 | |
3,000,000 | | PA EDFA (Forum)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2029 | | | | 3,196,950 | |
3,000,000 | | PA EDFA (Philadelphia Biosolids Facility)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 3,136,020 | |
17,715,000 | | PA Geisinger Authority Health System3 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 02/15/2045 | | | | 19,770,887 | |
115,000 | | PA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2022 | | | | 126,675 | |
9,000,000 | | PA GO3 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2022 | | | | 9,912,690 | |
4,055,000 | | PA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 4,473,679 | |
1,245,000 | | PA HEFA (Delaware Valley College of Science & Agriculture)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2027 | | | | 1,260,089 | |
535,000 | | PA HEFA (Delaware Valley College of Science & Agriculture)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2042 | | | | 519,587 | |
3,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Edinboro University Foundation)1 | | | 5.800 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 3,226,470 | |
3,500,000 | | PA HEFA (Edinboro University Foundation)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2043 | | | | 3,777,340 | |
1,300,000 | | PA HEFA (Gwynedd Mercy College)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 1,355,575 | |
750,000 | | PA HEFA (Indiana University Foundation)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 834,585 | |
2,650,000 | | PA HEFA (La Salle University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2029 | | | | 2,844,430 | |
40,000 | | PA HEFA (Pennsylvania State University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2022 | | | | 40,121 | |
1,400,000 | | PA HEFA (Shippensburg University Student Services)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2035 | | | | 1,456,952 | |
3,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Shippensburg University)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 3,269,580 | |
7,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Shippensburg University)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2043 | | | | 7,633,640 | |
1,750,000 | | PA HEFA (St. Francis University)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 1,975,435 | |
2,250,000 | | PA HEFA (St. Francis University)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 11/01/2041 | | | | 2,557,485 | |
1,000,000 | | PA HEFA (University Properties Student Hsg.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 1,083,460 | |
1,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Ursinus College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2029 | | | | 1,054,100 | |
|
22 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Widener University)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | | | | | 07/15/2038 | | | $ | 1,052,490 | |
5,000,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (Harrisburg Area Community College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 5,288,200 | |
3,500,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2027 | | | | 3,753,610 | |
4,410,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2028 | | | | 4,715,260 | |
3,000,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2029 | | | | 3,198,000 | |
250,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2030 | | | | 265,698 | |
2,250,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2031 | | | | 2,383,290 | |
4,780,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2032 | | | | 5,054,659 | |
1,000,000 | | PA Southcentral General Authority (Hanover Hospital)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 1,127,890 | |
12,940,000 | | PA Southcentral General Authority (Wellspan Health Obligated Group)3 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2029 | | | | 13,118,716 | |
3,750,000 | | PA State Public School Building Authority (Philadelphia School District)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2027 | | | | 4,269,413 | |
8,795,000 | | PA State Public School Building Authority (Philadelphia School District)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2032 | | | | 9,862,273 | |
4,800,000 | | PA State Public School Building Authority (Philadelphia School District)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 5,308,848 | |
200,000 | | PA State Public School Building Authority (Philadelphia School District)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 238,214 | |
1,750,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2030 | | | | 1,957,935 | |
500,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2030 | | | | 568,520 | |
1,000,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2031 | | | | 1,134,210 | |
2,000,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 2,215,620 | |
5,750,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2040 | | | | 6,393,482 | |
4,100,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.500 | 5 | | | | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 4,452,436 | |
900,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.500 | 5 | | | | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 977,364 | |
5,000,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2042 | | | | 5,720,850 | |
570,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 6.000 | 5 | | | | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 625,484 | |
610,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 6.000 | 5 | | | | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 669,377 | |
2,820,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 6.000 | 5 | | | | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 3,087,703 | |
10,000,000 | | PA Turnpike Commission1 | | | 6.375 | 5 | | | | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 12,316,000 | |
2,000,000 | | PA West Shore Area Hospital Authority (Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian Charity)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 2,218,480 | |
1,835,000 | | PA West Shore Area Hospital Authority (Holy Spirit Hospital of the Sisters of Christian Charity)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2041 | | | | 2,040,098 | |
1,430,000 | | Pennsylvania State University1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2041 | | | | 1,631,644 | |
2,500,000 | | Pennsylvania State University1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2047 | | | | 2,866,975 | |
2,500,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Architecture & Design Charter School)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | | | | | 03/15/2043 | | | | 1,826,075 | |
450,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Discovery Charter School)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2032 | | | | 455,787 | |
|
23 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$500,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Discovery Charter School)1 | | | 6.250 | % | | | | | | | 04/01/2042 | | | $ | 508,435 | |
1,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Global Leadership Academy)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2030 | | | | 1,023,520 | |
500,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Global Leadership Academy)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | | | | | 11/15/2040 | | | | 514,740 | |
2,040,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (International Apartments Temple University)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 06/15/2030 | | | | 2,121,314 | |
4,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (International Apartments Temple University)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | | | | | 06/15/2042 | | | | 4,123,760 | |
1,640,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Richard Allen Prep Charter School)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2033 | | | | 1,429,670 | |
2,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Tacony Academy Charter School)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | | | | | 06/15/2033 | | | | 2,181,000 | |
3,090,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Tacony Academy Charter School)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | | | | | 06/15/2043 | | | | 3,383,241 | |
9,230,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (TJU/TJUHS/TJUH/JUP/AHlth/AHlthF/ AMH/LHosp/AriaH/AHSys Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2047 | | | | 10,212,257 | |
4,165,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (University Plaza Associates)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2058 | | | | 4,408,944 | |
2,825,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. Senior Living (Presbyterian Homes Germantown)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 2,827,938 | |
3,500,000 | | Philadelphia, PA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 3,968,650 | |
6,260,000 | | Philadelphia, PA GO1 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 6,856,703 | |
250,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Hsg. Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2021 | | | | 250,833 | |
1,300,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Hsg. Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 1,434,433 | |
2,415,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Hsg. Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 2,668,551 | |
3,335,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Hsg. Authority (PHA Headquarters)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/01/2047 | | | | 3,658,895 | |
1,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Municipal Authority1 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2034 | | | | 1,033,700 | |
20,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Parking Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 02/15/2029 | | | | 20,066 | |
10,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2028 | | | | 11,348,700 | |
10,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2029 | | | | 11,310,500 | |
1,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2032 | | | | 1,118,190 | |
5,000 | | Philadelphia, PA School District1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2038 | | | | 5,019 | |
5,000 | | Philadelphia, PA School District1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2038 | | | | 5,019 | |
45,000 | | Philadelphia, PA School District1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2038 | | | | 45,169 | |
1,895,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Water & Wastewater1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2052 | | | | 2,116,109 | |
2,690,000 | | Pittsburgh, PA Urban Redevel. Authority (Marian Plaza)1 | | | 6.130 | | | | | | | | 01/20/2043 | | | | 2,746,813 | |
4,000,000 | | Pottsville, PA Hospital Authority (LVHN/LVlyH/ LVHM/SRehC/SRMC/NPHC/SMCSJS/PMCtr/PHSys Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 4,418,560 | |
900,000 | | Reading, PA Hsg. Auth (Goggle Works Apts.)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2042 | | | | 923,301 | |
2,895,000 | | Reading, PA Hsg. Auth (Goggle Works Apts.)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2052 | | | | 2,976,118 | |
1,500,000 | | Reading, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2037 | | | | 1,677,270 | |
1,500,000 | | Reading, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2038 | | | | 1,673,730 | |
820,000 | | Scranton, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 919,236 | |
|
24 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$750,000 | | Scranton, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | | | | | 12/01/2035 | | | $ | 837,593 | |
2,000,000 | | Westmoreland County, PA Municipal Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 08/15/2038 | | | | 2,230,520 | |
2,600,000 | | Wilkes-Barre, PA Area School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2034 | | | | 2,904,772 | |
2,125,000 | | Wilkes-Barre, PA Area School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2036 | | | | 2,360,833 | |
100,000 | | York County, PA IDA (York Water)1 | | | 4.750 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2036 | | | | 100,111 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 520,970,681 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Possessions—26.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
700,000 | | Guam Hsg. Corp. (Single Family Mtg.)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 09/01/2031 | | | | 708,981 | |
185,000 | | Guam Power Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2023 | | | | 204,488 | |
235,000 | | Guam Power Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2024 | | | | 257,210 | |
420,000 | | Guam Power Authority, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2030 | | | | 449,404 | |
575,000 | | Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth, Series A | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2022 | | | | 559,187 | |
1,155,000 | | Northern Mariana Islands Ports Authority, Series A | | | 6.250 | | | | | | | | 03/15/2028 | | | | 1,088,587 | |
855,000 | | Northern Mariana Islands Ports Authority, Series A | | | 6.600 | | | | | | | | 03/15/2028 | | | | 850,725 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.125 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 2,527,500 | |
810,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 682,425 | |
1,460,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,230,050 | |
1,005,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 846,712 | |
1,980,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 6.125 | 5 | | | | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 1,687,950 | |
27,270,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 05/15/2039 | | | | 27,448,346 | |
53,320,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC) | | | 7.153 | 7 | | | | | | | 05/15/2050 | | | | 5,905,190 | |
826,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC) | | | 7.622 | 7 | | | | | | | 05/15/2057 | | | | 36,746,190 | |
2,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO8 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 840,000 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO8 | | | 5.125 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 1,260,000 | |
2,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO8 | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 1,050,000 | |
5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO8 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 2,050,000 | |
7,360,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO8 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 3,017,600 | |
9,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO8 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 3,690,000 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO8 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 1,230,000 | |
15,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, NPFGC1 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 15,530 | |
790,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO8 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 329,825 | |
13,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO8 | | | 8.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 5,433,750 | |
403,059 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority8 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 252,920 | |
403,060 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority8 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 252,920 | |
336,338 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority8 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2021 | | | | 211,052 | |
336,339 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority8 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 211,053 | |
112,113 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority8 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 01/01/2022 | | | | 70,351 | |
112,113 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority8 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 70,351 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A8 | | | 6.750 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 1,852,500 | |
1,435,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA8 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 878,938 | |
5,540,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA8 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 3,393,250 | |
6,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series SS, NPFGC | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 6,022,260 | |
1,450,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT8 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2032 | | | | 888,125 | |
2,445,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX8 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 1,497,563 | |
|
25 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$725,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ8 | | | 5.000 | % | | | | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | $ | 444,063 | |
1,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority8 | | | 5.300 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 607,500 | |
10,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series A8 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 2,050 | |
325,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series H8 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 66,625 | |
270,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure4 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 28,350 | |
1,400,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure (Mepsi Campus)8 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 283,500 | |
1,250,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 03/01/2036 | | | | 1,115,625 | |
125,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.125 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2032 | | | | 115,000 | |
185,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Ana G. Mendez University) | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 04/01/2042 | | | | 166,500 | |
1,265,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority8 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 510,744 | |
2,070,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 815,062 | |
1,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority8 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 605,625 | |
1,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.750 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 403,750 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority8 | | | 10.000 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2034 | | | | 1,211,250 | |
1,015,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Series D8 | | | 5.250 | | | | | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 409,806 | |
5,725,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., Series B8 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2031 | | | | 157,438 | |
5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A8 | | | 5.375 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2039 | | | | 2,050,000 | |
950,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A8 | | | 5.500 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 389,500 | |
5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A8 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2037 | | | | 2,050,000 | |
5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A8 | | | 6.375 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2039 | | | | 2,050,000 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A8 | | | 6.500 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2044 | | | | 1,230,000 | |
30,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A8 | | | 7.276 | 7 | | | | | | | 08/01/2034 | | | | 3,537,300 | |
18,015,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C8 | | | 5.711 | 7 | | | | | | | 08/01/2038 | | | | 1,782,584 | |
20,130,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C8 | | | 5.750 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2057 | | | | 16,858,875 | |
5,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C8 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2039 | | | | 2,255,000 | |
1,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C8 | | | 6.000 | | | | | | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 410,000 | |
3,235,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series P | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2030 | | | | 2,507,125 | |
1,300,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series Q | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 06/01/2030 | | | | 1,007,500 | |
2,500,000 | | V.I. Public Finance Authority, Series C | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 10/01/2039 | | | | 2,237,500 | |
2,195,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 6.497 | 7 | | | | | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 637,801 | |
4,150,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 6.872 | 7 | | | | | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 1,092,695 | |
7,000,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. | | | 7.622 | 7 | | | | | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 1,843,100 | |
1,475,000 | | V.I. Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. (TASC)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | | | | | 05/15/2031 | | | | 1,477,994 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 166,070,795 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Investments, at Value (Cost $750,368,097)—108.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 687,041,476 | |
Net Other Assets (Liabilities)—(8.2) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (52,324,737 | ) |
Net Assets—100.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 634,716,739 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Footnotes to Statement of Investments
1. All or a portion of the security position has been segregated for collateral to cover borrowings. See Note 9 of the accompanying Notes.
2. All or a portion of the security position is when-issued or delayed delivery to be delivered and settled after period end. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
|
26 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Footnotes to Statement of Investments (Continued)
3. Security represents the underlying municipal bond with respect to an inverse floating rate security held by the Fund. The bond was purchased by the Fund and subsequently transferred to a trust, which issued the related inverse floating rate security. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
4. This security is accruing partial income at an anticipated effective rate based on expected interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate.
5. Denotes a step bond: a zero coupon bond that converts to a fixed or variable interest rate at a designated future date.
6. Interest or dividend is paid-in-kind, when applicable.
7. Zero coupon bond reflects effective yield on the original acquisition date.
8. This security is not accruing income because its issuer has missed or is expected to miss interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
9. The value of this security was determined using significant unobservable inputs. See Note 3 of the accompanying
Notes.
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below:
| | |
AHlth | | Abington Health |
AHlthF | | Abington Health Foundation |
AHSys | | Aria Health System |
AMH | | Abington Memorial Hospital |
AMS | | ACTS Management Services, Inc. |
AriaH | | Aria Health |
ARLC | | ACTS Retirement-Life Communities, Inc. |
ASCS | | ACTS Signature Community Services, Inc. |
ATI | | Azalea Trace, Inc. |
BHospital | | Brandywine Hospital |
CHH | | Chestnut Hill Hospital |
EDFA | | Economic Devel. Finance Authority |
ElwynCA | | Elwyn California |
ElwynNJ | | Elwyn New Jersey |
GO | | General Obligation |
GPA | | General Purpose Authority |
H&EFA | | Health and Educational Facilities Authority |
HDA | | Hospital Devel. Authority |
HEBA | | Higher Education Building Authority |
HEFA | | Higher Education Facilities Authority |
HEHA | | Higher Education and Health Authority |
IDA | | Industrial Devel. Agency |
IRSch | | Iron Range School |
ITEMECF | | Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Community Facilities |
JH | | Jennersville Hospital |
JUP | | Jefferson University Physicians |
KC | | Kidspeace Corporation |
KCH | | Kidspeace Childrens Hospital |
KMAKNC | | Kidspeace Mesabi Academy |
KNCONM | | Kidspeace National Centers of North America |
KNCONY | | Kidspeace National Centers of New York |
LHosp | | Landsdale Hospital |
LVE | | Lanier Village Estates, Inc. |
LVHM | | Lehigh Valley Hospital-Muhlenberg |
LVHN | | Lehigh Valley Health Network |
|
27 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
LVlyH | | Lehigh Valley Hospital |
MAS | | Mercy Adult Services |
MCMCSPA | | Mercy Catholic Medical Center of Southeastern Pennsylvania |
MHH | | Mercy Haverford Foundation |
MHP | | Mercy Health Plan |
MHSSPA | | Mercy Health System of Southeastern Pennsylvania |
NPFGC | | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
NPHC | | Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Corp. |
PHospital | | Phoenixville Hospital |
PHSys | | Pocono Health System |
PMCtr | | Pocono Medical Center |
PottsH | | Pottstown Hospital |
RHosp | | Reading Hospital |
RR | | Residential Resources |
RRDC | | Residential Resources Devel. Corp. |
RRSW | | Residential Resources Southwest |
SMCSJS | | Schuylkill Medical Center South Jackson Street |
SRehC | | Simpson Retirement Communities |
SRMC | | Schuylkill Regional Medical Center |
TASC | | Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds |
THlth | | Tower Health |
TJU | | Thomas Jefferson University |
TJUH | | Thomas Jefferson University Hospital |
TJUHS | | TJUH System |
UPMC | | University of Pittsburgh Medical Center |
V.I. | | United States Virgin Islands |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
28 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES July 31, 2018
| | | | |
| |
Assets | | | | |
Investments, at value (cost $750,368,097) —see accompanying statement of investments | | $ | 687,041,476 | |
| |
Cash | | | 245,651 | |
| |
Receivables and other assets: | | | | |
Interest | | | 6,657,461 | |
Investments sold (including $130,000 sold on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis) | | | 4,832,598 | |
Shares of beneficial interest sold | | | 505,746 | |
Other | | | 249,498 | |
| | | | |
Total assets | | | 699,532,430 | |
| | | | |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payables and other liabilities: | | | | |
Payable for short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | | 48,565,000 | |
Payable for borrowings (See Note 9) | | | 15,100,000 | |
Shares of beneficial interest redeemed | | | 473,673 | |
Dividends | | | 348,396 | |
Trustees’ compensation | | | 120,276 | |
Distribution and service plan fees | | | 110,812 | |
Interest expense on borrowings | | | 18,122 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 7,283 | |
Other | | | 72,129 | |
| | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 64,815,691 | |
| |
Net Assets | | $ | 634,716,739 | |
| | | | |
|
| |
Composition of Net Assets | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | $ | 784,788,579 | |
| |
Accumulated net investment income | | | 2,149,979 | |
| |
Accumulated net realized loss on investments | | | (88,895,198) | |
| |
Net unrealized depreciation on investments | | | (63,326,621) | |
| | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 634,716,739 | |
| | | | |
|
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | |
Net asset value and redemption price per share (based on net assets of $423,210,042 and 40,700,256 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $10.40 | |
Maximum offering price per share (net asset value plus sales charge of 4.75% of offering price) | | | $10.92 | |
| |
| |
Class C Shares: | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, redemption price (excludes applicable contingent deferred sales charge) and offering price per share (based on net assets of $161,664,043 and 15,589,817 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $10.37 | |
| |
| |
Class Y Shares: | | | | |
| |
Net asset value, redemption price and offering price per share (based on net assets of $49,842,654 and 4,790,616 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | | $10.40 | |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
29 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS For the Year Ended July 31, 2018
| | | | |
| |
Investment Income | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 34,932,410 | |
| |
Expenses | | | | |
Management fees | | | 3,488,935 | |
| |
Distribution and service plan fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 1,076,898 | |
Class B 1 | | | 9,073 | |
Class C | | | 1,559,909 | |
| |
Transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 443,886 | |
Class B 1 | | | 1,008 | |
Class C | | | 173,572 | |
Class Y | | | 45,878 | |
| |
Shareholder communications: | | | | |
Class A | | | 18,734 | |
Class B 1 | | | 337 | |
Class C | | | 9,271 | |
Class Y | | | 2,253 | |
| |
Borrowing fees | | | 768,923 | |
| |
Legal, auditing and other professional fees | | | 618,718 | |
| |
Interest expense on borrowings | | | 397,022 | |
| |
Interest expense and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | | 218,382 | |
| |
Trustees’ compensation | | | 8,951 | |
| |
Custodian fees and expenses | | | 4,661 | |
| |
Other | | | 13,054 | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 8,859,465 | |
| |
Net Investment Income | | | 26,072,945 | |
| | | | |
| |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | | |
| |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | (39,669,100) | |
| |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investment transactions | | | 31,315,112 | |
| |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | | $ | 17,718,957 | |
| | | | |
1. Effective June 1, 2018, all Class B shares converted to Class A shares.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
30 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | |
| |
Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 26,072,945 | | | $ | 32,872,346 | |
| |
Net realized loss | | | (39,669,100) | | | | (9,483,626) | |
| |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 31,315,112 | | | | (1,942,210) | |
| | | | |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | | 17,718,957 | | | | 21,446,510 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Dividends and/or Distributions to Shareholders | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (18,501,626) | | | | (26,488,471) | |
Class B1 | | | (37,707) | | | | (175,422) | |
Class C | | | (6,124,203) | | | | (9,427,119) | |
Class Y | | | (2,018,635) | | | | (2,143,487) | |
| | | | |
| | | (26,682,171) | | | | (38,234,499) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from beneficial interest transactions: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (71,558,257) | | | | (14,663,846) | |
Class B1 | | | (2,593,497) | | | | (2,888,195) | |
Class C | | | (35,340,354) | | | | (16,468,612) | |
Class Y | | | (3,952,301) | | | | 24,874,445 | |
| | | | |
| | | (113,444,409) | | | | (9,146,208) | |
| | | | | | | | |
| |
Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
Total decrease | | | (122,407,623) | | | | (25,934,197) | |
| |
Beginning of period | | | 757,124,362 | | | | 783,058,559 | |
| | | | |
End of period (including accumulated net investment income (loss) of $2,149,979 and $(1,280,355), respectively) | | $ | 634,716,739 | | | $ | 757,124,362 | |
| | | | |
1. Effective June 1, 2018, all Class B shares converted to Class A shares.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
31 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT
OF CASH FLOWS For the Year Ended July 31, 2018
| | | | |
| |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 17,718,957 | |
| |
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Purchase of investment securities | | | (91,297,678) | |
Proceeds from disposition of investment securities | | | 187,694,157 | |
Short-term investment securities, net | | | (11,180,699) | |
Premium amortization | | | 3,455,543 | |
Discount accretion | | | (7,459,587) | |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | 39,669,100 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investment transactions | | | (31,315,112) | |
Change in assets: | | | | |
Decrease in other assets | | | 13,160 | |
Decrease in interest receivable | | | 764,832 | |
Decrease in receivable for securities sold | | | 1,287,128 | |
Change in liabilities: | | | | |
Decrease in other liabilities | | | (31,568) | |
Decrease in payable for securities purchased | | | (7,376,480) | |
| | | | |
Net cash provided by operating activities | | | 101,941,753 | |
| | | | |
| |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | |
Proceeds from borrowings | | | 198,300,000 | |
Payments on borrowings | | | (183,200,000) | |
Payments/proceeds on short-term floating rate notes issued | | | 23,105,000 | |
Proceeds from shares sold | | | 68,287,885 | |
Payments on shares redeemed | | | (205,327,659) | |
Cash distributions paid | | | (3,535,560) | |
| | | | |
Net cash used in financing activities | | | (102,370,334) | |
| |
Net decrease in cash | | | (428,581) | |
| |
Cash, beginning balance | | | 674,232 | |
| | | | |
Cash, ending balance | | $ | 245,651 | |
| | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of reinvestment of dividends and distributions of $23,431,610.
Cash paid for interest on borrowings—$379,269.
Cash paid for interest on short-term floating rate notes issued—$218,382.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
32 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 |
|
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $10.44 | | | | $10.67 | | | | $10.49 | | | | $10.38 | | | $10.53 |
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.41 | | | | 0.47 | | | | 0.59 | | | | 0.63 | | | 0.67 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.03) | | | | (0.16) | | | | 0.20 | | | | 0.09 | | | (0.22) |
| | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.38 | | | | 0.31 | | | | 0.79 | | | | 0.72 | | | 0.45 |
|
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.54) | | | | (0.61) | | | | (0.61) | | | (0.60) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | | $10.40 | | | | $10.44 | | | | $10.67 | | | | $10.49 | | | $10.38 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 3.84% | | | | 2.96% | | | | 7.84% | | | | 6.98% | | | 4.57% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $423,210 | | | | $500,340 | | | | $526,247 | | | | $552,146 | | | $586,870 |
|
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $443,594 | | | | $509,600 | | | | $537,284 | | | | $589,000 | | | $624,096 |
|
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.09% | | | | 4.50% | | | | 5.59% | | | | 5.93% | | | 6.60% |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 0.97% | | | | 0.83% | | | | 0.80% | | | | 0.77% | | | 0.76% |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.18% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | 0.14% |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.03% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.07% | | | 0.13% |
| | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.18% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 0.97% | | | | 0.95% | | | 1.03% |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.18% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 0.97% | | | | 0.95% | | | 1.03%5 |
|
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 13% | | | | 20% | | | | 6% | | | | 12% | | | 6% |
|
33 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Continued
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
34 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 |
|
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $10.42 | | | | $10.64 | | | | $10.47 | | | | $10.36 | | | $10.51 |
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.40 | | | | 0.51 | | | | 0.55 | | | 0.60 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.04) | | | | (0.15) | | | | 0.19 | | | | 0.09 | | | (0.22) |
| | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.30 | | | | 0.25 | | | | 0.70 | | | | 0.64 | | | 0.38 |
|
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.35) | | | | (0.47) | | | | (0.53) | | | | (0.53) | | | (0.53) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | | $10.37 | | | | $10.42 | | | | $10.64 | | | | $10.47 | | | $10.36 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 3.07% | | | | 2.23% | | | | 7.06% | | | | 6.19% | | | 3.79% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $161,664 | | | | $199,497 | | | | $220,769 | | | | $226,296 | | | $236,269 |
|
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $173,445 | | | | $209,822 | | | | $221,129 | | | | $239,680 | | | $255,808 |
|
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.43% | | | | 3.79% | | | | 4.84% | | | | 5.17% | | | 5.84% |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 1.62% | | | | 1.56% | | | | 1.55% | | | | 1.52% | | | 1.52% |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.18% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | 0.14% |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.03% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.07% | | | 0.13% |
| | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.83% | | | | 1.73% | | | | 1.72% | | | | 1.70% | | | 1.79% |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.83% | | | | 1.73% | | | | 1.72% | | | | 1.70% | | | 1.79%5 |
|
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 13% | | | | 20% | | | | 6% | | | | 12% | | | 6% |
|
35 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Continued
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
36 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 |
|
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $10.45 | | | | $10.68 | | | | $10.50 | | | | $10.38 | | | $10.53 |
|
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.47 | | | | 0.60 | | | | 0.65 | | | 0.69 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | (0.05) | | | | (0.14) | | | | 0.20 | | | | 0.10 | | | (0.22) |
| | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.39 | | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.80 | | | | 0.75 | | | 0.47 |
|
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.44) | | | | (0.56) | | | | (0.62) | | | | (0.63) | | | (0.62) |
|
Net asset value, end of period | | | $10.40 | | | | $10.45 | | | | $10.68 | | | | $10.50 | | | $10.38 |
| | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 3.98% | | | | 3.14% | | | | 7.99% | | | | 7.23% | | | 4.72% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $49,843 | | | | $54,584 | | | | $30,357 | | | | $29,137 | | | $26,322 |
|
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $45,899 | | | | $39,973 | | | | $28,378 | | | | $30,378 | | | $28,437 |
|
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.33% | | | | 4.53% | | | | 5.73% | | | | 6.07% | | | 6.75% |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 0.72% | | | | 0.65% | | | | 0.65% | | | | 0.62% | | | 0.62% |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.18% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | | 0.11% | | | 0.14% |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.03% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.06% | | | | 0.07% | | | 0.13% |
| | | |
Total expenses | | | 0.93% | | | | 0.82% | | | | 0.82% | | | | 0.80% | | | 0.89% |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 0.93% | | | | 0.82% | | | | 0.82% | | | | 0.80% | | | 0.89% |
|
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 13% | | | | 20% | | | | 6% | | | | 12% | | | 6% |
|
37 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Continued
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
38 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS July 31, 2018
1. Organization
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund (the “Fund”) is a separate series of Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust, a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”), as amended. The Fund’s investment objective is to seek tax-free income. The Fund’s investment adviser is OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (“OFI Global” or the “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“OFI” or the “Sub-Adviser”). The Manager has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with OFI.
The Fund offers Class A, Class C and Class Y shares, and previously offered Class B shares for new purchase through June 29, 2012. Subsequent to that date, no new purchases of Class B shares were permitted. Reinvestment of dividend and/or capital gain distributions and exchanges of Class B shares into and from other Oppenheimer funds were permitted through May 31, 2018. Effective June 1, 2018 (the “Conversion Date”), all Class B shares converted to Class A shares. Class A shares are sold at their offering price, which is normally net asset value plus a front-end sales charge. Class C shares are sold, and Class B shares were sold, without a front-end sales charge but may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”). Class Y shares are sold to certain institutional investors or intermediaries without either a front-end sales charge or a CDSC, however, the intermediaries may impose charges on their accountholders who beneficially own Class Y shares. All classes of shares have identical rights and voting privileges with respect to the Fund in general and exclusive voting rights on matters that affect that class alone. Earnings, net assets and net asset value per share may differ due to each class having its own expenses, such as transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees and shareholder communications, directly attributable to that class. Class A and C shares have, and Class B shares had, separate distribution and/or service plans under which they pay, and Class B shares paid, fees. Class I and Class Y shares do not pay such fees. Previously issued Class B shares automatically converted to Class A shares 72 months after the date of purchase.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed in the Fund’s preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Security Valuation. All investments in securities are recorded at their estimated fair value, as described in Note 3.
Allocation of Income, Expenses, Gains and Losses. Income, expenses (other than those attributable to a specific class), gains and losses are allocated on a daily basis to each class of shares based upon the relative proportion of net assets represented by such class. Operating expenses directly attributable to a specific class are charged against the operations of that class.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders. Dividends and distributions to
|
39 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
shareholders, which are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. GAAP, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid annually or at other times as determined necessary by the Manager.
Investment Income. Interest income is recognized on an accrual basis. Discount and premium, which are included in interest income on the Statement of Operations, are amortized or accreted daily.
Custodian Fees. “Custodian fees and expenses” in the Statement of Operations may include interest expense incurred by the Fund on any cash overdrafts of its custodian account during the period. Such cash overdrafts may result from the effects of failed trades in portfolio securities and from cash outflows resulting from unanticipated shareholder redemption activity. The Fund pays interest to its custodian on such cash overdraft at a rate equal to the Prime Rate plus 0.35%. The “Reduction to custodian expenses” line item, if applicable, represents earnings on cash balances maintained by the Fund during the period. Such interest expense and other custodian fees may be paid with these earnings.
Security Transactions. Security transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on securities sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
Indemnifications. The Fund’s organizational documents provide current and former Trustees and officers with a limited indemnification against liabilities arising in connection with the performance of their duties to the Fund. In the normal course of business, the Fund may also enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would be dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Federal Taxes. The Fund intends to comply with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income, including any net realized gain on investments not offset by capital loss carryforwards, if any, to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income or excise tax provision is required. The Fund files income tax returns in U.S. federal and applicable state jurisdictions. The statute of limitations on the Fund’s tax return filings generally remains open for the three preceding fiscal reporting period ends. The Fund has analyzed its tax positions for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018, including open tax years, and does not believe there are any uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Fund’s financial statements.
The tax components of capital shown in the following table represent distribution requirements the Fund must satisfy under the income tax regulations, losses the Fund may be able to offset against income and gains realized in future years and unrealized appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes.
|
40 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Undistributed Net Investment Income | | Undistributed Long-Term Gain | | | Accumulated Loss Carryforward1,2,3,4
| | | Net Unrealized Depreciation Based on cost of Securities and Other Investments for Federal Income Tax Purposes | |
| |
$6,571,834 | | | $— | | | | $88,806,694 | | | | $65,683,244 | |
1. At period end, the Fund had $88,806,694 of net capital loss carryforward available to offset future realized capital gains, if any, and thereby reduce future taxable gain distributions.
2. During the reporting period, the Fund did not utilize any capital loss carryforward.
3. During the previous reporting period, the Fund did not utilize any capital loss carryforward.
4. During the reporting period, $43,078,455 of unused capital loss carryforward expired.
Net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) may differ for financial statement and tax purposes. The character of dividends and distributions made during the fiscal year from net investment income or net realized gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax requirements, which may differ from the character of net investment income or net realized gains presented in those financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Also, due to timing of dividends and distributions, the fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the fiscal year in which the income or net realized gain was recorded by the Fund.
Accordingly, the following amounts have been reclassified for the reporting period. Net assets of the Fund were unaffected by the reclassifications.
| | | | | | | | |
Reduction to Paid-in Capital | | Reduction to Accumulated Net Investment Loss | | | Reduction to Accumulated Net Realized Loss on Investments | |
$43,078,455 | | | $4,039,560 | | | | $39,038,895 | |
The tax character of distributions paid during the reporting periods:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | |
Distributions paid from: | | | | | | | | |
Exempt-interest dividends | | $ | 26,429,383 | | | $ | 38,057,756 | |
Ordinary income | | | 252,788 | | | | 176,743 | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 26,682,171 | | | $ | 38,234,499 | |
| | | | |
The aggregate cost of securities and other investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes at period end are noted in the following table. The primary difference between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments, if applicable, is attributable to the tax deferral of losses or tax realization of financial statement unrealized gain or loss.
|
41 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
| | | | |
Federal tax cost of securities | | $ | 703,770,7201 | |
| | | | |
| |
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 22,297,854 | |
| |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (87,981,098) | |
| | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (65,683,244) | |
| | | | |
1. The Federal tax cost of securities does not include cost of $48,954,000, which has otherwise been recognized for financial reporting purposes, related to bonds placed into trusts in conjunction with certain investment transactions. See the Inverse Floating Rate Securities note in Note 4.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncement. In March 2017, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), ASU 2017-08. This provides guidance related to the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Manager is evaluating the impacts of these changes on the financial statements.
3. Securities Valuation
The Fund calculates the net asset value of its shares as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern Time, on each day the New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”) is open for trading, except in the case of a scheduled early closing of the Exchange, in which case the Fund will calculate net asset value of the shares as of the scheduled early closing time of the Exchange.
The Fund’s Board has adopted procedures for the valuation of the Fund’s securities and has delegated the day-to-day responsibility for valuation determinations under those procedures to the Manager. The Manager has established a Valuation Committee which is responsible for determining a fair valuation for any security for which market quotations are not readily available. The Valuation Committee’s fair valuation determinations are subject to review, approval and ratification by the Fund’s Board at least quarterly or more frequently, if necessary.
Valuation Methods and Inputs
Securities are valued primarily using unadjusted quoted market prices, when available, as supplied by third party pricing services or broker-dealers.
The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or the fair value of the types of securities described below:
Corporate and government debt securities (of U.S. or foreign issuers) and municipal debt
|
42 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
securities, short-term notes, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and asset-backed securities are valued at the mean between the bid and asked prices utilizing evaluated prices obtained from third party pricing services or broker-dealers who may use matrix pricing methods to determine the evaluated prices. Pricing services generally price debt securities assuming orderly transactions of an institutional “round lot” size, but some trades may occur in smaller, “odd lot” sizes, sometimes at lower prices than institutional round lot trades. Standard inputs generally considered by third-party pricing vendors include reported trade data, broker-dealer price quotations, benchmark yields, issuer spreads on comparable securities, the credit quality, yield, maturity, as well as other appropriate factors.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or when a significant event has occurred that would materially affect the value of the security, are fair valued either (i) by a standardized fair valuation methodology applicable to the security type or the significant event as previously approved by the Valuation Committee and the Fund’s Board or (ii) as determined in good faith by the Manager’s Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee considers all relevant facts that are reasonably available, through either public information or information available to the Manager, when determining the fair value of a security. Those standardized fair valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to, valuing securities at the last sale price or initially at cost and subsequently adjusting the value based on: changes in company specific fundamentals, changes in an appropriate securities index, or changes in the value of similar securities which may be further adjusted for any discounts related to security-specific resale restrictions. When possible, such methodologies use observable market inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices of similar securities, observable interest rates, currency rates and yield curves. The methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities nor can it be assured that the Fund can obtain the fair value assigned to a security if it were to sell the security.
Classifications
Each investment asset or liability of the Fund is assigned a level at measurement date based on the significance and source of the inputs to its valuation. Various data inputs may be used in determining the value of each of the Fund’s investments as of the reporting period end.
These data inputs are categorized in the following hierarchy under applicable financial accounting standards:
1) Level 1-unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (including securities actively traded on a securities exchange)
2) Level 2-inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and market corroborated inputs such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.)
3) Level 3-significant unobservable inputs (including the Manager’s own judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability).
The inputs used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated
|
43 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
with investing in those securities.
The table below categorizes amounts that are included in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities at period end based on valuation input level:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1— Unadjusted Quoted Prices | | | Level 2— Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | Level 3— Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | Value | |
| |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pennsylvania | | $ | — | | | $ | 515,713,319 | | | $ | 5,257,362 | | | $ | 520,970,681 | |
U.S. Possessions | | | — | | | | 166,070,795 | | | | — | | | | 166,070,795 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | — | | | $ | 681,784,114 | | | $ | 5,257,362 | | | $ | 687,041,476 | |
| | | | |
Forward currency exchange contracts and futures contracts, if any, are reported at their unrealized appreciation/depreciation at measurement date, which represents the change in the contract’s value from trade date. All additional assets and liabilities included in the above table are reported at their market value at measurement date.
The table below shows the transfers between Level 2 and Level 3. The Fund’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the beginning of the reporting period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Transfers into Level 2* | | | Transfers out of Level 2** | | | Transfers into Level 3** | | | Transfers out of Level 3* | |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pennsylvania | | $ | 27 | | | $ | (4,878,730) | | | $ | 4,878,730 | | | $ | (27) | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 27 | | | $ | (4,878,730) | | | $ | 4,878,730 | | | $ | (27) | |
| | | | |
*Transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 due to the availability of market data for this security.
**Transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 because of the lack of observable market data due to a decrease in market activity for these securities.
4. Investments and Risks
Inverse Floating Rate Securities. The Fund invests in inverse floating rate securities that pay interest at a rate that varies inversely with short-term interest rates. Because inverse floating rate securities are leveraged instruments, the value of an inverse floating rate security will change more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and other market fluctuations than the market value of a conventional fixed-rate municipal security of similar maturity and credit quality, including the municipal bond underlying an inverse floating rate security.
An inverse floating rate security is created as part of a financial transaction referred to as a
|
44 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
“tender option bond” transaction. In most cases, in a tender option bond transaction the Fund sells a fixed-rate municipal bond (the “underlying municipal bond”) to a trust (the “Trust”). The Trust then issues and sells short-term floating rate securities with a fixed principal amount representing a senior interest in the underlying municipal bond to third parties and a residual, subordinate interest in the underlying municipal bond (referred to as an “inverse floating rate security”) to the Fund. The interest rate on the short-term floating rate securities resets periodically, usually weekly, to a prevailing market rate and holders of these securities are granted the option to tender their securities back to the Trust for repurchase at their principal amount plus accrued interest thereon (the “purchase price”) periodically, usually daily or weekly. A remarketing agent for the Trust is required to attempt to re-sell any tendered short-term floating rate securities to new investors for the purchase price. If the remarketing agent is unable to successfully re-sell the tendered short-term floating rate securities, a liquidity provider to the Trust must contribute cash to the Trust to ensure that the tendering holders receive the purchase price of their securities on the repurchase date.
Because holders of the short-term floating rate securities are granted the right to tender their securities to the Trust for repurchase at frequent intervals for the purchase price, with such payment effectively guaranteed by the liquidity provider, the securities generally bear short-term rates of interest commensurate with money market instruments. When interest is paid on the underlying municipal bond to the Trust, such proceeds are first used to pay the Trust’s administrative expenses and accrued interest to holders of the short-term floating rate securities, with any remaining amounts being paid to the Fund, as the holder of the inverse floating rate security. Accordingly, the amount of such interest on the underlying municipal bond paid to the Fund is inversely related to the rate of interest on the short-term floating rate securities. Additionally, because the principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities is fixed and is not adjusted in response to changes in the market value of the underlying municipal bond, any change in the market value of the underlying municipal bond is reflected entirely in a change to the value of the inverse floating rate security.
Typically, the terms of an inverse floating rate security grant certain rights to the Fund, as holder. For example, the Fund typically has the right upon request to require that the Trust compel a tender of the short-term floating rate securities to facilitate the Fund’s acquisition of the underlying municipal bond. Following such a request, the Fund pays the Trust the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities and a specified portion of any market value gain on the underlying municipal bond since its deposit into the Trust, which the Trust uses to redeem the short-term floating rate securities. The Trust then distributes the underlying municipal bond to the Fund. Through the exercise of this right, the Fund can voluntarily terminate or “collapse” the Trust, terminate its investment in the related inverse floating rate security and obtain the underlying municipal bond. Additionally, the Fund also typically has the right to exchange with the Trust (i) a principal amount of short-term floating rate securities held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of the inverse floating rate security or (ii) a principal amount of the inverse floating rate security held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of short-term floating rate securities (which are typically then sold to other investors). Through the exercise of this right, the Fund may increase
|
45 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
(or decrease) the principal amount of short-term floating rate securities outstanding, thereby increasing (or decreasing) the amount of leverage provided by the short-term floating rate securities to the Fund’s investment exposure to the underlying municipal bond.
The Fund’s investments in inverse floating rate securities involve certain risks. As short-term interest rates rise, an inverse floating rate security produces less current income (and, in extreme cases, may pay no income) and as short-term interest rates fall, an inverse floating rate security produces more current income. Thus, if short-term interest rates rise after the issuance of the inverse floating rate security, any yield advantage is reduced or eliminated. All inverse floating rate securities entail some degree of leverage represented by the outstanding principal amount of the related short-term floating rate securities, relative to the par value of the underlying municipal bond. The value of, and income earned on, an inverse floating rate security that has a higher degree of leverage will fluctuate more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and to changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond than that of an inverse floating rate security with a lower degree of leverage, and is more likely to be eliminated entirely under adverse market conditions. Changes in the value of an inverse floating rate security will also be more significant than changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond because the leverage provided by the related short-term floating rate securities increases the sensitivity of an inverse floating rate security to changes in interest rates and to the market value of the underlying municipal bond. An inverse floating rate security can be expected to underperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is decreasing (or is already small) or when long-term interest rates are rising, but can be expected to outperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is increasing (or is already large) or when long-term interest rates are falling. Additionally, a tender option bond transaction typically provides for the automatic termination or “collapse” of a Trust upon the occurrence of certain adverse events, usually referred to as “mandatory tender events” or “tender option termination events.” These events may include, among others, a credit ratings downgrade of the underlying municipal bond below a specified level, a decrease in the market value of the underlying municipal bond below a specified amount, a bankruptcy of the liquidity provider or the inability of the remarketing agent to resell to new investors short-term floating rate securities that have been tendered for repurchase by holders thereof. Following the occurrence of such an event, the underlying municipal bond is generally sold for current market value and the proceeds distributed to holders of the short-term floating rate securities and inverse floating rate security, with the holder of the inverse floating rate security (the Fund) generally receiving the proceeds of such sale only after the holders of the short-term floating rate securities have received proceeds equal to the purchase price of their securities (and the liquidity provider is generally required to contribute cash to the Trust only in an amount sufficient to ensure that the holders of the short-term floating rate securities receive the purchase price of their securities in connection with such termination of the Trust). Following the occurrence of such events, the Fund could potentially lose the entire amount of its investment in the inverse floating rate security.
Finally, the Fund may enter into shortfall/reimbursement agreements with the liquidity
|
46 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
provider of certain tender option bond transactions in connection with certain inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund. These agreements commit the Fund to reimburse the liquidity provider to the extent that the liquidity provider must provide cash to a Trust, including following the termination of a Trust resulting from the occurrence of a “mandatory tender event.” In connection with the occurrence of such an event and the termination of the Trust triggered thereby, the shortfall/reimbursement agreement will make the Fund liable for the amount of the negative difference, if any, between the liquidation value of the underlying municipal bond and the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Under the standard terms of a tender option bond transaction, absent such a shortfall/ reimbursement agreement, the Fund, as holder of the inverse floating rate security, would not be required to make such a reimbursement payment to the liquidity provider. The Manager monitors the Fund’s potential exposure with respect to these agreements on a daily basis and intends to take action to terminate the Fund’s investment in related inverse floating rate securities, if it deems it appropriate to do so. At period end, the Fund’s maximum exposure under such agreements is estimated at $28,395,000.
When the Fund creates an inverse floating rate security in a tender option bond transaction by selling an underlying municipal bond to a Trust, the transaction is considered a secured borrowing for financial reporting purposes. As a result of such accounting treatment, the Fund includes the underlying municipal bond on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities (but does not separately include the related inverse floating rate security on either). The Fund also includes a liability on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities equal to the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest on the related short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Interest on the underlying municipal bond is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations, while interest payable on the related short-term floating rate securities is recorded as interest expense. At period end, municipal bond holdings with a value of $71,174,930 shown on the Fund’s Statement of Investments are held by such Trusts and serve as the underlying municipal bonds for the related $48,565,000 in short-term floating rate securities issued and outstanding at that date.
At period end, the inverse floating rate securities associated with tender option bond transactions accounted for as secured borrowings were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| $ 4,465,000 | | | Berks County, PA IDA (THlth/RHosp/BHospital/ CHH/JH/PHospital/PottsH Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2533 Trust3 | | | 9.655% | | | | 11/1/47 | | | $ | 5,857,544 | |
| 3,250,000 | | | Berks County, PA Municipal Authority Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2016 Trust3 | | | 14.113 | | | | 11/1/31 | | | | 3,830,093 | |
| 3,545,000 | | | Geisinger, PA Authority (Geisinger Health System) Tender Option Bond Series 2015 XF-0602 Trust | | | 15.520 | | | | 2/15/45 | | | | 5,600,887 | |
| 3,000,000 | | | PA GO Tender Option Bond Series 2016-XF0534 Trust | | | 9.903 | | | | 6/1/22 | | | | 3,912,690 | |
|
47 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| | |
| $ 3,230,000 | | | PA Southcentral General Authority (Wellspan Health, York Hospital, Gettysburg Hospital Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2131 Trust3 | | | 16.241% | | | | 6/1/29 | | | $ | 3,408,716 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 22,609,930 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. For a list of abbreviations used in the Inverse Floater table see the Portfolio Abbreviations table at the end of the Statement of Investments.
2. Represents the current interest rate for the inverse floating rate security.
3. Represents an inverse floating rate security that is subject to a shortfall/reimbursement agreement.
The Fund may also purchase an inverse floating rate security created as part of a tender option bond transaction not initiated by the Fund when a third party, such as a municipal issuer or financial institution, transfers an underlying municipal bond to a Trust. For financial reporting purposes, the Fund includes the inverse floating rate security related to such transaction on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities, and interest on the security is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations.
The Fund may invest in inverse floating rate securities with any degree of leverage (as measured by the outstanding principal amount of related short-term floating rate securities). However, the Fund may only expose up to 20% of its total assets to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities. This limitation is measured by comparing the aggregate principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities that are related to the inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund to the total assets of the Fund. The Fund’s exposure to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities amounts to $48,565,000 or 6.94% of its total assets at period end.
Securities on a When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis. The Fund may purchase securities on a “when-issued” basis, and may purchase or sell securities on a “delayed delivery” basis. “When-issued” or “delayed delivery” refers to securities whose terms and indenture are available and for which a market exists, but which are not available for immediate delivery. Delivery and payment for securities that have been purchased by the Fund on a when-issued basis normally takes place within six months and possibly as long as two years or more after the trade date. During this period, such securities do not earn interest, are subject to market fluctuation and may increase or decrease in value prior to their delivery. The purchase of securities on a when-issued basis may increase the volatility of the Fund’s net asset value to the extent the Fund executes such transactions while remaining substantially fully invested. When the Fund engages in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions, it relies on the buyer or seller, as the case may be, to complete the transaction. Their failure to do so may cause the Fund to lose the opportunity to obtain or dispose of the security at a price and yield it considers advantageous. The Fund may also sell securities that it purchased on a when-issued basis or forward commitment prior to settlement of the original purchase.
|
48 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
At period end, the Fund had sold securities issued on a delayed delivery basis as follows:
| | | | |
| | When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis Transactions | |
| |
Sold securities | | | $ 130,000 | |
Credit Risk. The Fund invests in high-yield, non-investment-grade bonds, which may be subject to a greater degree of credit risk. Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer to meet interest or principal payments or both as they become due. The Fund may acquire securities that have missed an interest payment, and is not obligated to dispose of securities whose issuers or underlying obligors subsequently miss an interest and/or principal payment.
In June 2016, Congress passed the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”). PROMESA established a federally-appointed fiscal oversight board (the “Oversight Board”) to oversee Puerto Rico’s financial operations and allows the Oversight Board to file cases on behalf of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or one of its instrumentalities to restructure debt and other obligations of the relevant entity in a “Title III” proceeding. Title III incorporates many provisions of the federal Bankruptcy Code for U.S. territories, and incorporates legal mechanisms for a litigation stay and restructuring of pension and debt obligations, among other provisions. In early May 2017, Title III petitions were filed for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”), two of the largest issuers of Puerto Rico debt. Title III petitions for Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority (“PRHTA”) and Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) were subsequently filed in mid-May and early July, respectively. Title III petitions for additional Puerto Rican instrumentalities may be filed. These restructuring proceedings create uncertainty as to the treatment of claims of varying degrees of seniority and the levels and priorities of payment from the affected entities.
Information concerning securities not accruing interest at period end is as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
Cost | | | $123,663,560 | | | | | |
Market Value | | | $65,392,058 | | | | | |
Market Value as % of Net Assets | | | 10.30% | | | | | |
Concentration Risk. The Fund invests a large percentage of its total assets in obligations of issuers within its respective state and U.S. territories. Risks may arise from geographic concentration in any state, commonwealth or territory, such as Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands. Certain economic, regulatory or political developments occurring in the state, commonwealth or territory such as ongoing developments in Puerto Rico may impair the ability of certain issuers of municipal securities to pay principal and interest on their obligations.
5. Market Risk Factors
The Fund’s investments in securities and/or financial derivatives may expose the Fund to various market risk factors:
|
49 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
5. Market Risk Factors (Continued)
Commodity Risk. Commodity risk relates to the change in value of commodities or commodity indexes as they relate to increases or decreases in the commodities market. Commodities are physical assets that have tangible properties. Examples of these types of assets are crude oil, heating oil, metals, livestock, and agricultural products.
Credit Risk. Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer of debt to meet interest and principal payments, or both, as they come due. In general, lower-grade, higher-yield debt securities are subject to credit risk to a greater extent than lower-yield, higher-quality securities.
Equity Risk. Equity risk relates to the change in value of equity securities as they relate to increases or decreases in the general market.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk. Foreign exchange rate risk relates to the change in the U.S. dollar value of a security held that is denominated in a foreign currency. The U.S. dollar value of a foreign currency denominated security will decrease as the dollar appreciates against the currency, while the U.S. dollar value will increase as the dollar depreciates against the currency.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk refers to the fluctuations in value of fixed-income securities resulting from the inverse relationship between price and yield. For example, an increase in general interest rates will tend to reduce the market value of already issued fixed-income investments, and a decline in general interest rates will tend to increase their value. In addition, debt securities with longer maturities, which tend to have higher yields, are subject to potentially greater fluctuations in value from changes in interest rates than obligations with shorter maturities.
Volatility Risk. Volatility risk refers to the magnitude of the movement, but not the direction of the movement, in a financial instrument’s price over a defined time period. Large increases or decreases in a financial instrument’s price over a relative time period typically indicate greater volatility risk, while small increases or decreases in its price typically indicate lower volatility risk.
6. Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund has authorized an unlimited number of no par value shares of beneficial interest of each class. Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold1 | | | 3,264,565 | | | $ | 32,744,691 | | | | 5,257,460 | | | $ | 55,073,746 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 1,583,701 | | | | 15,894,703 | | | | 2,152,725 | | | | 22,561,837 | |
Redeemed | | | (12,061,229 | ) | | | (120,197,651 | ) | | | (8,819,104 | ) | | | (92,299,429 | ) |
Net decrease | | | (7,212,963 | ) | | $ | (71,558,257 | ) | | | (1,408,919 | ) | | $ | (14,663,846 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
50 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
6. Shares of Beneficial Interest (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 34 | | | $ | 343 | | | | 3,082 | | | $ | 32,328 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 3,459 | | | | 34,714 | | | | 14,637 | | | | 153,394 | |
Redeemed1 | | | (262,554) | | | | (2,628,554) | | | | (292,025) | | | | (3,073,917) | |
Net decrease | | | (259,061) | | | $ | (2,593,497) | | | | (274,306) | | | $ | (2,888,195) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 1,216,982 | | | $ | 12,191,245 | | | | 2,001,073 | | | $ | 20,955,609 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 562,752 | | | | 5,632,066 | | | | 789,856 | | | | 8,257,664 | |
Redeemed | | | (5,343,607) | | | | (53,163,665) | | | | (4,378,996) | | | | (45,681,885) | |
Net decrease | | | (3,563,873) | | | $ | (35,340,354) | | | | (1,588,067) | | | $ | (16,468,612) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 2,307,383 | | | $ | 23,263,618 | | | | 3,186,877 | | | $ | 33,267,075 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 185,867 | | | | 1,870,127 | | | | 182,375 | | | | 1,912,475 | |
Redeemed | | | (2,926,787) | | | | (29,086,046) | | | | (988,574) | | | | (10,305,105) | |
Net increase (decrease) | | | (433,537) | | | $ | (3,952,301) | | | | 2,380,678 | | | $ | 24,874,445 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. All outstanding Class B shares converted to Class A shares on June 1, 2018.
7. Purchases and Sales of Securities
The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities, other than short-term obligations, for the reporting period were as follows:
| | | | | | | | |
| | Purchases | | | Sales | |
Investment securities | | $ | 91,297,678 | | | $ | 187,694,157 | |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Management Fees. Under the investment advisory agreement, the Fund pays the Manager a management fee based on the daily net assets of the Fund at an annual rate as shown in the following table:
| | | | |
Fee Schedule | | | |
Up to $200 million | | | 0.60% | |
Next $100 million | | | 0.55 | |
Next $200 million | | | 0.50 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.45 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.40 | |
Next $4 billion | | | 0.35 | |
Over $5 billion | | | 0.33 | |
The Fund’s effective management fee for the reporting period was 0.53% of average annual net assets before any applicable waivers.
|
51 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
Sub-Adviser Fees. The Manager has retained the Sub-Adviser to provide the day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. Under the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Manager pays the Sub-Adviser an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the investment management fee collected by the Manager from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any investment management fee waivers. The fee paid to the Sub-Adviser is paid by the Manager, not by the Fund.
Transfer Agent Fees. OFI Global (the “Transfer Agent”) serves as the transfer and shareholder servicing agent for the Fund. The Fund pays the Transfer Agent a fee based on annual net assets, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. Fees incurred and average net assets for each class with respect to these services are detailed in the Statement of Operations and Financial Highlights, respectively.
Sub-Transfer Agent Fees. The Transfer Agent has retained Shareholder Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of OFI (the “Sub-Transfer Agent”), to provide the day-to-day transfer agent and shareholder servicing of the Fund. Under the Sub-Transfer Agency Agreement, the Transfer Agent pays the Sub-Transfer Agent an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the transfer agent fee collected by the Transfer Agent from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. The fee paid to the Sub-Transfer Agent is paid by the Transfer Agent, not by the Fund.
Trustees’ Compensation. The Fund has adopted an unfunded retirement plan (the “Plan”) for the Fund’s Independent Trustees. Benefits are based on years of service and fees paid to each Trustee during their period of service. The Plan was frozen with respect to adding new participants effective December 31, 2006 (the “Freeze Date”) and existing Plan Participants as of the Freeze Date will continue to receive accrued benefits under the Plan. Active Independent Trustees as of the Freeze Date have each elected a distribution method with respect to their benefits under the Plan.
During the reporting period, the Fund’s projected benefit obligations, payments to retired Trustees and accumulated liability were as follows:
| | | | |
Projected Benefit Obligations Increased | | $ | — | |
Payments Made to Retired Trustees | | | 5,460 | |
Accumulated Liability as of July 31, 2018 | | | 47,083 | |
The Fund’s Board of Trustees (“Board”) has adopted a compensation deferral plan for Independent Trustees that enables Trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Fund. For purposes of determining the amount owed to the Trustee under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of the Fund or in other Oppenheimer funds selected by the Trustee. The Fund purchases shares of the funds selected for deferral by the Trustee in amounts equal to his or her deemed investment, resulting in a Fund asset equal
|
52 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
to the deferred compensation liability. Such assets are included as a component of “Other” within the asset section of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferral of Trustees’ fees under the plan will not affect the net assets of the Fund and will not materially affect the Fund’s assets, liabilities or net investment income per share. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the compensation deferral plan.
Distribution and Service Plan (12b-1) Fees. Under its General Distributor’s Agreement with the Fund, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (the “Distributor”) acts as the Fund’s principal underwriter in the continuous public offering of the Fund’s classes of shares.
Service Plan for Class A Shares. The Fund has adopted a Service Plan (the “Plan”) for Class A shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the Plan, the Fund reimburses the Distributor for a portion of its costs incurred for services provided to accounts that hold Class A shares. Reimbursement is made periodically at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the daily net assets of Class A shares of the Fund. The Distributor currently uses all of those fees to pay dealers, brokers, banks and other financial institutions periodically for providing personal service and maintenance of accounts of their customers that hold Class A shares. Any unreimbursed expenses the Distributor incurs with respect to Class A shares in any fiscal year cannot be recovered in subsequent periods. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plan are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Distribution and Service Plans for Class B and Class C Shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution and Service Plans (the “Plans”) for Class C shares, and had previously adopted a similar plan for Class B shares, pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act to compensate the Distributor for distributing those share classes, maintaining accounts and providing shareholder services. Under the Plans, the Fund pays the Distributor an annual asset-based sales charge of 0.75% on Class C shares’ daily net assets. The Fund paid the Distributor an annual asset-based sales charge of 0.75% on Class B shares prior to their Conversion Date. The Fund also pays a service fee under the Plans at an annual rate of 0.15% of daily net assets and previously paid this fee for Class B prior to their Conversion Date. The Plans continue in effect from year to year only if the Fund’s Board of Trustees votes annually to approve their continuance at an in person meeting called for that purpose. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plans are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Sales Charges. Front-end sales charges and CDSC do not represent expenses of the Fund. They are deducted from the proceeds of sales of Fund shares prior to investment or from redemption proceeds prior to remittance, as applicable. The sales charges retained by the Distributor from the sale of shares and the CDSC retained by the Distributor on the redemption of shares is shown in the following table for the period indicated.
|
53 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended | | Class A Front-End Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class A Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class B Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor1 | | | Class C Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | |
July 31, 2018 | | | $54,954 | | | | $13,836 | | | | $1,055 | | | | $20,920 | |
1. All outstanding Class B shares converted to Class A shares on June 1, 2018.
9. Borrowings and Other Financing
Borrowings. The Fund can borrow money from banks in amounts up to one third of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less all liabilities and indebtedness other than borrowings (meaning that the value of those assets must be at least 300% of the amount borrowed). The Fund can use those borrowings for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities. The Fund also may borrow to meet redemption obligations or for temporary and emergency purposes. When the Fund invests borrowed money in portfolio securities, it is using a speculative investment technique known as leverage and changes in the value of the Fund’s investments will have a larger effect on its share price than if it did not borrow because of the effect of leverage.
The Fund can also use the borrowings for other investment-related purposes, including in connection with the Fund’s inverse floater investments as discussed in Note 4. The Fund may use the borrowings to reduce the leverage amount of, or unwind or “collapse” trusts that issued “inverse floaters” owned by the Fund, or in circumstances in which the Fund has entered into a shortfall and forbearance agreement with the sponsor of the inverse floater trust to meet the Fund’s obligation to reimburse the sponsor of the inverse floater for the difference between the liquidation value of the underlying bond and the amount due to holders of the short-term floating rate notes issued by the Trust. See the discussion in Note 4 (Inverse Floating Rate Securities) for additional information.
The Fund will pay interest and may pay other fees in connection with loans. If the Fund does borrow, it will be subject to greater expenses than funds that do not borrow. The interest on borrowed money and the other fees incurred in conjunction with loans are an expense that might reduce the Fund’s yield and return. Expenses incurred by the Fund with respect to interest on borrowings and commitment fees are disclosed separately or as other expenses on the Statement of Operations.
The Fund entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with conduit lenders and Citibank N.A. which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed, secured borrowing facility that permits borrowings of up to $2.5 billion, collectively, by the Oppenheimer Rochester Funds. To secure the loan, the Fund pledges investment securities in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Securities held in collateralized accounts to cover these borrowings are noted in the Statement of Investments. Interest is charged to the Fund, based on its borrowings, at current commercial
|
54 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
paper issuance rates (2.1405% at period end). The Fund pays additional fees monthly to its lender on its outstanding borrowings to manage and administer the facility and is allocated its pro-rata share of an annual structuring fee and ongoing commitment fees both of which are based on the total facility size. Total fees and interest that are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations related to its participation in the borrowing facility during the reporting period equal 0.15% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis. The Fund has the right to prepay such loans and terminate its participation in the conduit loan facility at any time upon prior notice.
At period end, the Fund had borrowings outstanding at an interest rate of 2.1405%.
Details of the borrowings for the reporting period are as follows:
| | | | |
Average Daily Loan Balance | | $ | 23,661,096 | |
Average Daily Interest Rate | | | 1.658 | % |
Fees Paid | | $ | 554,613 | |
Interest Paid | | $ | 379,269 | |
Reverse Repurchase Agreements. The Fund may engage in reverse repurchase agreements. A reverse repurchase agreement is the sale of one or more securities to a counterparty at an agreed-upon purchase price with the simultaneous agreement to repurchase those securities on a future date at a higher repurchase price. The repurchase price represents the repayment of the purchase price and interest accrued thereon over the term of the repurchase agreement. The cash received by the Fund in connection with a reverse repurchase agreement may be used for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities or for other purposes such as those described in the preceding “Borrowings” note.
The Fund entered into a Committed Repurchase Transaction Facility (the “Facility”) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (the “counterparty”) which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed reverse repurchase agreement facility that permits aggregate outstanding reverse repurchase agreements of up to $750 million, collectively. Interest is charged to the Fund on the purchase price of outstanding reverse repurchase agreements at current LIBOR rates plus an applicable spread. The Fund is also allocated its pro-rata share of an annual structuring fee based on the total Facility size and ongoing commitment fees based on the total unused amount of the Facility. The Fund retains the economic exposure to fluctuations in the value of securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility and therefore these transactions are considered secured borrowings for financial reporting purposes. The Fund also continues to receive the economic benefit of interest payments received on securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements, in the form of a direct payment from the counterparty. These payments are included in interest income on the Statement of Operations. Total fees and interest related to the Fund’s participation in the Facility during the reporting period are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations and equal 0.03% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis.
The securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility are valued on
|
55 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
a daily basis. To the extent this value, after adjusting for certain margin requirements of the Facility, exceeds the cash proceeds received, the Fund may request the counterparty to return securities equal in margin value to this excess. To the extent that the cash proceeds received exceed the margin value of the securities subject to the transaction, the counterparty may request additional securities from the Fund. The Fund has the right to declare each Wednesday as the repurchase date for any outstanding reverse repurchase agreement upon delivery of advanced notification and may also recall any security subject to such a transaction by substituting eligible securities of equal or greater margin value according to the Facility’s terms.
The Fund executed no transactions under the Facility during the reporting period.
Details of reverse repurchase agreement transactions for the reporting period are as follows:
|
56 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees
Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund (the “Fund”), a separate series of Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust, including the statement of investments, as of July 31, 2018, the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the “financial statements”) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of July 31, 2018, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2018, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
KPMG LLP
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Oppenheimer Funds investment companies, however we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Oppenheimer Funds investment companies since at least 1969.
Denver, Colorado
September 27, 2018
|
57 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
FEDERAL INCOME TAX INFORMATION Unaudited
In early 2018, if applicable, shareholders of record received information regarding all dividends and distributions paid to them by the Fund during calendar year 2017.
None of the dividends paid by the Fund during the reporting period are eligible for the corporate dividend-received deduction. 99.05% of the dividends were derived from interest on municipal bonds and are not subject to federal income taxes. To the extent a shareholder is subject to any state or local tax laws, some or all of the dividends received may be taxable.
The foregoing information is presented to assist shareholders in reporting distributions received from the Fund to the Internal Revenue Service. Because of the complexity of the federal regulations which may affect your individual tax return and the many variations in state and local tax regulations, we recommend that you consult your tax advisor for specific guidance.
|
58 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
PORTFOLIO PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND GUIDELINES;
UPDATES TO STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Unaudited
The Fund has adopted Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines under which the Fund votes proxies relating to securities (“portfolio proxies”) held by the Fund. A description of the Fund’s Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), (ii) on the Fund’s website at www.oppenheimerfunds.com, and (iii) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the Fund is required to file Form N-PX, with its complete proxy voting record for the 12 months ended June 30th, no later than August 31st of each year. The Fund’s voting record is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), and (ii) in the Form N-PX filing on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first quarter and the third quarter of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Form N-Q filings are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Those forms may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
Householding—Delivery of Shareholder Documents
This is to inform you about OppenheimerFunds’ “householding” policy. If more than one member of your household maintains an account in a particular fund, OppenheimerFunds will mail only one copy of the fund’s prospectus (or, if available, the fund’s summary prospectus), annual and semiannual report and privacy policy. The consolidation of these mailings, called householding, benefits your fund through reduced mailing expense, and benefits you by reducing the volume of mail you receive from OppenheimerFunds. Householding does not affect the delivery of your account statements.
Please note that we will continue to household these mailings for as long as you remain an OppenheimerFunds shareholder, unless you request otherwise. If you prefer to receive multiple copies of these materials, please call us at 1.800.CALL-OPP (225-5677). You may also notify us in writing or via email. We will begin sending you individual copies of the prospectus (or, if available, the summary prospectus), reports and privacy policy within 30 days of receiving your request to stop householding.
|
59 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
DISTRIBUTION SOURCES Unaudited
For any distribution that took place over the last six months of the Fund’s reporting period, the table below details on a per-share basis the percentage of the Fund’s total distribution payment amount that was derived from the following sources: net income, net profit from the sale of securities, and other capital sources. Other capital sources represent a return of capital. A return of capital may occur, for example, when some or all of the money that you invested in the Fund is paid back to you. A return of capital distribution does not necessarily reflect the Fund’s investment performance and should not be confused with “yield” or “income.” You should not draw any conclusions about the Fund’s investment performance from the amounts of these distributions. This information is based upon income and capital gains using generally accepted accounting principles as of the date of each distribution. If the Fund (or an underlying fund in which the Fund invests) invests in real estate investment trusts (REITs) and/or master limited partnerships (MLPs), the percentages attributed to each category are estimated using historical information because the character of the amounts received from the REITs and/or MLPs in which the Fund (or underlying fund) invests is unknown until after the end of the calendar year. Because the Fund is actively managed, the relative amount of the Fund’s total distributions derived from various sources over the calendar year may change. Please note that this information should not be used for tax reporting purposes as the tax character of distributable income may differ from the amounts used for this notification. You will receive IRS tax forms in the first quarter of each calendar year detailing the actual amount of the taxable and non-taxable portion of distributions paid to you during the tax year.
For the most current information, please go to oppenheimerfunds.com. Select your Fund, and scroll down to the ‘Dividends’ table under ‘Analytics’.
| | | | | | | | |
Fund Name | | Pay Date | | Net Income | | Net Profit from Sale | | Other Capital Sources |
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund | | 2/20/18 | | 94.5% | | 0.0% | | 5.5% |
|
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund | | 4/24/18 | | 80.8% | | 0.0% | | 19.2% |
|
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund | | 5/22/18 | | 80.1% | | 0.0% | | 19.9% |
|
Oppenheimer Rochester Pennsylvania Municipal Fund | | 7/24/18 | | 94.8% | | 0.0% | | 5.2% |
|
|
60 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited
| | |
Name, Position(s) Held with the Fund, Length of Service, Year of Birth | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years; Other Trusteeships/ Directorships Held. |
| |
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES | | The address of each Trustee in the chart below is 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924. Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, or until his or her resignation, retirement, death or removal. Each of the Trustees in the chart below oversees 48 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. |
| |
Brian F. Wruble, Chairman of the Board of Trustees (since 2007) and Trustee (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1943 | | Governor of Community Foundation of the Florida Keys (non-profit) (since July 2012); Director of TCP Capital, Inc. (registered business development company) (since November 2015); Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees (since August 2011), Chairman of the Board of Trustees (August 2007-August 2011), Trustee of the Board of Trustees (since August 1991) of The Jackson Laboratory (non-profit); Member of Zurich Insurance Group’s Investment Management Advisory Council (insurance) (October 2004-February 2017); Treasurer (since 2007) and Trustee (since May 1992) of the Institute for Advanced Study (non-profit educational institute); Director of Special Value Opportunities Fund, LLC (registered investment company) (affiliate of the Sub-Adviser’s parent company) (September 2004- June 2015); General Partner of Odyssey Partners, L.P. (hedge fund) (September 1995-December 2007); Special Limited Partner of Odyssey Investment Partners, LLC (private equity investment) (January 1999-September 2004). Mr. Wruble has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since April 2001, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Beth Ann Brown, Trustee (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1968 | | Director, Board of Directors of Caron Engineering Inc. (since January 2018); Advisor, Board of Advisors of Caron Engineering Inc. (December 2014-December 2017); Independent Consultant (since September 2012); held the following positions at Columbia Management Investment Advisers LLC: Head of Intermediary Distribution (2008-2012), Managing Director, Strategic Relations (2005-2008), Managing Director, Head of National Accounts (2004-2005); Senior Vice President, National Account Manager (2002-2004), Senior Vice President, Key Account Manager (1999-2002) and Vice President, Key Account Manager (1996-1999) of Liberty Funds Distributor, Inc.; President and Director, of Acton Shapleigh Youth Conservation Corps (non -profit) (2012-2015); and Vice President and Director of Grahamtastic Connection (non-profit) (since May 2013). Ms. Brown has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since January 2016, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., Trustee (since 2013) Year of Birth: 1948 | | Director of THL Credit, Inc. (since November 2016) (alternative credit investment manager); Advisory Board Member of the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs of Syracuse University (April 2012-September 2016); Director of Mercury Defense Systems Inc. (information technology) (August 2011-February 2013); Trustee of the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation Athletic & Scholarship Program (since November 2010); Advisory Board Member of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory (federally-funded research development) (since May 2010); Director of The Boeing Company (aerospace and defense) (since October 2009); Trustee of MITRE Corporation (federally-funded research development) (since September 2008); Independent Director of QinetiQ Group Plc (defense technology and security) (February 2008-August 2011); Chairman of Monster |
|
61 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited / Continued
| | |
Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., Continued | | Worldwide, Inc. (career services) (March 2015-November 2016), Director of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (career services) (February 2008-June 2011); Lead Director (June 2011-March 2015); Chairman of Alenia North America, Inc. (military and defense products) (January 2008-October 2009); Director of SRA International, Inc. (information technology and services) (January 2008-July 2011); President of Giambastiani Group LLC (national security and energy consulting) (since October 2007); United States Navy, career nuclear submarine officer (June 1970-October 2007); Seventh Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (2005-October 2007); Supreme Allied Commander of NATO Allied Command Transformation (2003- 2005) and Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command (2002-2005). Since his retirement from the U.S. Navy in October 2007, Admiral Giambastiani has also served on numerous U.S. Government advisory boards, investigations and task forces for the Secretaries of Defense, State and Interior and the Central Intelligence Agency. He recently completed serving as a federal commissioner on the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission. Admiral Giambastiani has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since February 2013, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. For purposes of this report, Admiral Giambastiani is identified as a Trustee. |
| |
Elizabeth Krentzman, Trustee (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1959 | | Trustee of the University of Florida National Board Foundation (since September 2017); Member of the Cartica Funds Board of Directors (private investment funds) (since January 2017); Member of the University of Florida Law Center Association, Inc. Board of Trustees and Audit Committee Member (since April 2016); Member of University of Florida Law Advisory Board, Washington, DC Alumni Group (since 2015); Advisory Board Member of the Securities and Exchange Commission Historical Society (since 2007); held the following positions at Deloitte & Touche LLP: Principal and Chief Regulatory Advisor for Asset Management Services (2007 - 2014) and U.S. Mutual Fund Leader (2011 - 2014); General Counsel of the Investment Company Institute (trade association) (June 2004 - April 2007); held the following positions at Deloitte & Touche LLP: National Director of the Investment Management Regulatory Consulting Practice (1997 - 2004), Principal (2003 - 2004), Director (1998 - 2003) and Senior Manager (1997 - 1998); Assistant Director of the Division of Investment Management - Office of Disclosure and Investment Adviser Regulation of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (1996 – 1997) and various positions with the Division of Investment Management – Office of Regulatory Policy (1991 - 1996) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Associate at Ropes & Gray LLP (1987 - 1991). Ms. Krentzman has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since August 2014, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Mary F. Miller, Trustee (since 2004) Year of Birth: 1942 | | Trustee of International House (not-for-profit) (since June 2007); Trustee of the American Symphony Orchestra (not-for-profit) (October 1998-November 2011); and Senior Vice President and General Auditor of American Express Company (financial services company) (July 1998-February 2003). Ms. Miller has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since August 2004, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
|
62 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | |
Joel W. Motley, Trustee (since 2002) Year of Birth: 1952 | | Director of Office of Finance Federal Home Loan Bank (since September 2016); Director of Greenwall Foundation (since October 2013); Member of Board and Investment Committee of The Greenwall Foundation (since April 2013); Member of the Vestry of Trinity Wall Street (since April 2012); Director of Southern Africa Legal Services Foundation (since March 2012); Board Member and Investment Committee Member of Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting (non-profit journalism) (since March 2011); Managing Director of Public Capital Advisors, LLC (privately- held financial advisor) (since January 2006); Managing Director of Carmona Motley, Inc. (privately-held financial advisor) (since January 2002); Director of Columbia Equity Financial Corp. (privately-held financial advisor) (2002-2007); Managing Director of Carmona Motley Hoffman Inc. (privately-held financial advisor) (January 1998-December 2001); Member of the Finance and Budget Committee of the Council on Foreign Relations, Member of the Investment Committee and Board of Human Rights Watch (since July 2000) and Member of the Investment Committee and Board of Historic Hudson Valley (since February 2010). Mr. Motley has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since October 2002, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Joanne Pace, Trustee (since 2013) Year of Birth: 1958 | | Advisory Board Director of Massey Quick Simon & Co. (wealth management), LLC (since October 2014); Board Director of Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey (healthcare) (since November 2012); Advisory Board Director of The Alberleen Group LLC (investment banking) (since March 2012); Governing Council Member (since 2016) and Chair of Education Committee (since 2017) of Independent Directors Council (IDC) (since 2016); Board Member of 100 Women in Finance (non-profit) (since January 2015); Advisory Council Member of Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital (non-profit) (since May 2012); Director of The Komera Project (non-profit) (April 2012-2016); New York Advisory Board Director of Peace First (non-profit) (March 2010-2013); Senior Advisor of SECOR Asset Management, LP (2010-2011); Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of Morgan Stanley Investment Management (2006-2010); Partner and Chief Operating Officer of FrontPoint Partners, LLC (hedge fund) (2005-2006); held the following positions at Credit Suisse (investment banking): Managing Director (2003-2005); Global Head of Human Resources and member of Executive Board and Operating Committee (2004-2005), Global Head of Operations and Product Control (2003-2004); held the following positions at Morgan Stanley: Managing Director (1997-2003), Controller and Principal Accounting Officer (1999-2003); Chief Financial Officer (temporary assignment) for the Oversight Committee, Long Term Capital Management (1998-1999). Lead Independent Director and Chair of the Audit and Nominating Committee of The Global Chartist Fund, LLC of Oppenheimer Asset Management (2011-2012); Board Director of Managed Funds Association (2008-2010); Board Director of Morgan Stanley Foundation (2007-2010) and Investment Committee Chair (2008-2010). Ms. Pace has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since November 2012, including as an Advisory Board Member for certain Oppenheimer funds, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Board’s deliberations. For purposes of this report, Ms. Pace is identified as a Trustee. |
|
63 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited / Continued
| | |
Daniel Vandivort, Trustee (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1954 | | Chairman and Lead Independent Director/Trustee (March 2010-September 2014), Chairman of the Audit Committee (March 2009-September 2014) and Director/Trustee (December 2008-September 2014) of the Board of Directors/ Trustees of Value Line Funds; Trustee (since January 2015) and Treasurer and Chairman of the Audit Committee and Finance Committee (since January 2016) of Board of Trustees of Huntington Disease Foundation of America; Trustee, Board of Trustees, RIM Retirement Savings Plan (2005-2007); President and Chief Investment Officer, Robeco Investment Management, formerly known as Weiss Peck and Greer (January 2005-June 2007); Member, Management Committee of Robeco Investment Management (2001-2007); Chairman and Trustee of the Board of Trustees of Weiss, Peck and Greer Funds (2004-2005); Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income, Weiss, Peck and Greer (November 1994-January 2005); Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income, CS First Boston Investment Management (January 1992-November 1994); Director, Global Product Development, First Boston Asset Management (November 1989-January 1992); Vice President, Fixed Income Sales, First Boston Corp. (May 1984-November 1989). Mr. Vandivort has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since 2014, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
INTERESTED TRUSTEE AND OFFICER | | Mr. Steinmetz is an “Interested Trustee” because he is affiliated with the Manager and the Sub-Adviser by virtue of his positions as Chairman of the Sub-Adviser and officer and director of the Manager. Both as a Trustee and as an officer, Mr. Steinmetz serves for an indefinite term, or until his resignation, retirement, death or removal. Mr. Steinmetz’s address is 225 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10281-1008. Mr. Steinmetz is an officer of 104 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. |
| |
Arthur P. Steinmetz, Trustee (since 2015), President and Principal Executive Officer (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1958 | | Chairman of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (since January 2015); CEO and Chairman of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since July 2014), President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since May 2013), a Director of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since January 2013), Director of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (since July 2014), President, Management Director and CEO of Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp. (OppenheimerFunds, Inc.‘s parent holding company) (since July 2014), and President and Director of OFI SteelPath, Inc. (since January 2013). Chief Investment Officer of the OppenheimerFunds advisory entities from (January 2013-December 2013); Executive Vice President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (January 2013-May 2013); Chief Investment Officer of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (October 2010-December 2012); Chief Investment Officer, Fixed-Income, of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (April 2009-October 2010); Executive Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (October 2009-December 2012); Director of Fixed Income of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (January 2009-April 2009); and a Senior Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (March 1993-September 2009). |
| |
OTHER OFFICERS OF THE FUND | | The addresses of the Officers in the chart below are as follows: for Messrs. Cottier, Willis, DeMitry, Camarella, Pulire, Stein, Mss. Lo Bessette, Foxson and Picciotto, 225 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10281-1008, for Mr. Petersen, 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924. Each Officer serves for an indefinite term or until his or her resignation, retirement, death or removal. |
| |
Scott S. Cottier, Vice President (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1971 | | Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since January 2017) and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since September 2002). Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (September 2002-January 2017). Portfolio Manager and trader at Victory Capital Management (1999-2002). Team Leader, a Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
|
64 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | |
Troy E. Willis, Vice President (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1972 | | Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since January 2017) and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since January 2006); Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2009-January 2017); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2005- June 2009). Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (June 2002-December 2005). Corporate Attorney for Southern Resource Group (June 1999-July 2001). Team Leader, a Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Mark R. DeMitry, Vice President (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1976 | | Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since July 2009); Associate Portfolio Manager of the Fund (September 2006- June 2009). Research Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (June 2003-September 2006) and a Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (July 2001-May 2003). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Michael L. Camarella, Vice President (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1976 | | Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since January 2011); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2009-December 2010); Associate Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (January 2008-December 2010). Research Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (April 2006-December 2007) and a Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (June 2003-March 2006). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Charles S. Pulire, Vice President (since 2011) Year of Birth: 1977 | | Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since February 2013); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (December 2010-January 2013); Research Analyst of the Manager (February 2008-November 2010); Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (May 2006-January 2008). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Elizabeth S. Mossow, Vice President (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1978 | | Senior Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (since January 2017); Vice President and Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (January 2016-January 2017); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (January 2011-January 2016); Associate Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (June 2013-January 2016); Portfolio Research Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (June 2011 to June 2013); Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (May 2007 to May 2011). She was a Risk Management Analyst at Manning & Napier Associates (September 2006-May 2007); Analyst/Trading Assistant at The Baupost Group (August 2000-March 2006). Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Richard A. Stein, Vice President (since 2007) Year of Birth: 1957 | | Director of the Rochester Credit Analysis team (since March 2004); Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since June 2011) and a Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (November 1997-May 2011); heads up the Rochester Credit Analysis team (since May 1993). |
|
65 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited / Continued
| | |
Cynthia Lo Bessette, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1969 | | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since February 2016); Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (March 2015-February 2016); Chief Legal Officer of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. and OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (since February 2016); Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp. (since February 2016); General Counsel of OFI SteelPath, Inc., OFI Advisors, LLC and Index Management Solutions, LLC (since February 2016); Chief Legal Officer of OFI Global Institutional, Inc., HarbourView Asset Management Corporation, OFI Global Trust Company, Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc., OFI Private Investments Inc., Shareholder Services, Inc. and Trinity Investment Management Corporation (since February 2016); Corporate Counsel (February 2012-March 2015) and Deputy Chief Legal Officer (April 2013-March 2015) of Jennison Associates LLC; Assistant General Counsel (April 2008-September 2009) and Deputy General Counsel (October 2009-February 2012) of Lord Abbett & Co. LLC. |
| |
Jennifer Foxson, Vice President and Chief Business Officer (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1969 | | Senior Vice President of OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (since June 2014); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (April 2006-June 2014); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (January 1998-March 2006); Assistant Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (October 1991-December 1998). |
| |
Mary Ann Picciotto, Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Anti-Money Laundering Officer (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1973 | | Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since March 2014); Chief Compliance Officer of OppenheimerFunds, Inc., OFI SteelPath, Inc., OFI Global Institutional, Inc., Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc., OFI Private Investments Inc., Harborview Asset Management Corporation, Trinity Investment Management Corporation, and Shareholder Services, Inc. (since March 2014); Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. and certain of its various affiliated entities; Chief Compliance Officer of various Morgan Stanley Funds (May 2010-January 2014); Chief Compliance Officer of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. (April 2007-January 2014). |
| |
Brian S. Petersen, Treasurer and Principal Financial & Accounting Officer (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1970 | | Senior Vice President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since January 2017); Vice President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (January 2013-January 2017); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (February 2007-December 2012); Assistant Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (August 2002-2007). |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers and is available without charge upon request by calling 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677).
|
66 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND
| | |
Manager | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
| |
Sub-Adviser | | OppenheimerFunds, Inc. |
| |
Distributor | | OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. |
| |
Transfer and Shareholder | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
Servicing Agent | | |
| |
Sub-Transfer Agent | | Shareholder Services, Inc. |
| | DBA OppenheimerFunds Services |
| |
Independent Registered | | KPMG LLP |
Public Accounting Firm | | |
| |
Legal Counsel | | Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP |
© 2018 OppenheimerFunds, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
67 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
PRIVACY NOTICE
As an Oppenheimer fund shareholder, you are entitled to know how we protect your personal information and how we limit its disclosure.
Information Sources
We obtain non-public personal information about our shareholders from the following sources:
● | | Applications or other forms. |
● | | When you create a user ID and password for online account access. |
● | | When you enroll in eDocs Direct,SM our electronic document delivery service. |
● | | Your transactions with us, our affiliates or others. |
● | | Technologies on our website, including: “cookies” and web beacons, which are used to collect data on the pages you visit and the features you use. |
If you visit oppenheimerfunds.com and do not log on to the secure account information areas, we do not obtain any personal information about you. When you do log on to a secure area, we do obtain your user ID and password to identify you. We also use this information to provide you with products and services you have requested, to inform you about products and services that you may be interested in and assist you in other ways.
We do not collect personal information through our website unless you willingly provide it to us, either directly by email or in those areas of the website that request information. In order to update your personal information (including your mailing address, email address and phone number) you must first log on and visit your user profile.
If you have set your browser to warn you before accepting cookies, you will receive the warning message with each cookie. You can refuse cookies by turning them off in your browser. However, doing so may limit your access to certain sections of our website.
We use cookies to help us improve and manage our website. For example, cookies help us recognize new versus repeat visitors to the site, track the pages visited, and enable some special features on the website. This data helps us provide better service for our website visitors.
Protection of Information
We do not disclose any non-public personal information (such as names on a customer list) about current or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law.
Disclosure of Information
Copies of confirmations, account statements and other documents reporting activity in your fund accounts are made available to your financial advisor (as designated by you). We may also use details about you and your investments to help us, our financial service affiliates, or firms that jointly market their financial products and services with ours, to better serve your investment needs or suggest educational material that may be of interest to you. If this requires us to provide you with an opportunity to “opt in” or “opt out” of such information sharing with a firm not affiliated with us, you will receive notification on how to do so, before any such sharing takes place.
Right of Refusal
We will not disclose your personal information to unaffiliated third parties (except as permitted by law), unless we first offer you a reasonable opportunity to refuse or “opt out” of such disclosure.
|
68 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
Internet Security and Encryption
In general, the email services provided by our website are encrypted and provide a secure and private means of communication with us. To protect your own privacy, confidential and/ or personal information should only be communicated via email when you are advised that you are using a secure website.
As a security measure, we do not include personal or account information in non-secure emails, and we advise you not to send such information to us in non-secure emails. Instead, you may take advantage of the secure features of our website to encrypt your email correspondence. To do this, you will need to use a browser that supports Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol.
● | | All transactions conducted via our websites, including redemptions, exchanges and purchases, are secured by the highest encryption standards available. SSL is used to establish a secure connection between your PC and OppenheimerFunds’ server. It transmits information in an encrypted and scrambled format. |
● | | Encryption is achieved through an electronic scrambling technology that uses a “key” to code and then decode the data. Encryption acts like the cable converter box you may have on your television set. It scrambles data with a secret code so that no one can make sense of it while it is being transmitted. When the data reaches its destination, the same software unscrambles the data. |
● | | You can exit the secure area by closing your browser or, for added security, you can use the Log Out button before you close your browser. |
Other Security Measures
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your personal account information. Our employees and agents have access to that information only so that they may offer you products or provide services, for example, when responding to your account questions.
How You Can Help
You can also do your part to keep your account information private and to prevent unauthorized transactions. If you obtain a user ID and password for your account, safeguard that information. Strengthening your online credentials–your online security profile–typically your user name, password, and security questions and answers, can be one of your most important lines of defense on the Internet. For additional information on how you can help prevent identity theft, visit https://www.oppenheimerfunds.com/security.
Who We Are
This joint notice describes the privacy policies of the Oppenheimer funds, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., each of its investment adviser subsidiaries, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. and OFI Global Trust Co. It applies to all Oppenheimer fund accounts you presently have, or may open in the future, using your Social Security number—whether or not you remain a shareholder of our funds. This notice was last updated as of November 2017. In the event it is updated or changed, we will post an updated notice on our website at oppenheimerfunds.com. If you have any questions about this privacy policy, email us by clicking on the Contact Us section of our website at oppenheimerfunds.com, write to us at P.O. Box 5270, Denver, CO 80217-5270, or call us at 800 CALL OPP (225 5677).
|
69 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
70 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
|
71 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL FUND |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g590605dsp72a.jpg)
OppenheimerFunds®
The Right Way
to Invest
Visit us at oppenheimerfunds.com for 24-hr access to
account information and transactions or call us at 800.CALL
OPP (800.225.5677) for 24-hr automated information and
automated transactions. Representatives also available
Mon–Fri 8am-8pm ET.
| | |
Visit Us oppenheimerfunds.com Call Us 800 225 5677 | | |
Follow Us ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g590605dsp72b.jpg)
| | Oppenheimer funds are distributed by OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. 225 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10281-1008 © 2018 OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. All rights reserved. RA0740.001.0718 September 27, 2018 |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g590570page001.jpg)
Table of Contents
Class A Shares
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS AT 7/31/18
| | | | | | |
| | Class A Shares of the Fund | | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | With Sales Charge | | Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index |
1-Year | | 6.34% | | 1.29% | | 0.99% |
5-Year | | 7.92 | | 6.87 | | 3.76 |
10-Year | | 5.38 | | 4.87 | | 4.41 |
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and a 4.75% maximum applicable sales charge except where “without sales charge” is indicated. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investment. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677).
Our Twitter handle is @RochesterFunds.
|
2 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
Fund Performance Discussion
Oppenheimer Rochester High Yield Municipal Fund once again generated high levels of tax-free income during the 12-month reporting period that ended July 31, 2018. The Class A shares provided a yield-driven, annual total return of 6.34% at net asset value (NAV) and a distribution yield of 4.92% at NAV. Additionally, the fund outperformed the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, its benchmark, by 535 basis points. Tax-free income comprised nearly 85% of this fund’s total return this reporting period, further evidence supporting our focus on yield as the long-term driver of Fund performance.
MARKET OVERVIEW
The first quarter-point increase of this reporting period was announced after the FOMC’s December 2017 meeting. The rate was also raised in March and June 2018. The Fed Funds target rate remained unchanged at its July meeting. The FOMC’s policy statement issued after that meeting repeatedly referred to the economy and labor markets as
“strong” and signaled that subsequent rate rises will be needed to keep the economy steady. A majority of officials at the July meeting suggested at least two more rate increases this year.
The average distribution yield in Lipper’s High Yield Municipal Debt Funds category was 3.76% at the end of this reporting period. At 4.92%, the distribution yield at NAV for this Fund’s Class A shares was 116 basis points higher than the category average.
The target range, which was set to the range of zero to 0.25% between December 2008 and December 2015, has had six increases of 0.25 percentage points to date.
| | | | | |
| |
YIELDS & DISTRIBUTIONS FOR CLASS A SHARES | | | | | |
Dividend Yield w/o sales charge | | | | 4.92 | % |
Dividend Yield with sales charge | | | | 4.68 | |
Standardized Yield | | | | 3.12 | |
Taxable Equivalent Yield | | | | 4.95 | |
Last distribution (7/24/18) | | | $ | 0.030 | |
Total distributions (8/1/17 to 7/31/18) | | | $ | 0.372 | |
| |
Endnotes for this discussion begin on page 12 of this report. | | | | | |
|
3 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
The Fed’s efforts to “normalize” its balance sheet, which began in October 2017 with reductions of $10 billion a month, continued throughout this reporting period. The Fed has said that it expects reductions to reach $50 billion a month by year-end 2018.
During this reporting period, the muni market’s reactions to the Fed’s announcements did not appear to be especially significant or lasting.
In December 2017, President Donald J. Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The top federal income tax rate for 2018 was lowered to 37%, from 39.6%. Although it had been targeted for elimination, the federal tax exemption on the net investment income generated by muni bonds and muni bond funds remained intact. Additionally, this income will continue to be exempt from the 3.8% tax on unearned income that applies to the income generated by investments in other asset classes.
At the end of this reporting period, the ICE BofA Merrill Lynch AAA Municipal Securities Index – the AAA subset of the broader ICE BofA Merrill Lynch US Municipal Securities Index – yielded 2.41%, 66 basis points higher than at the reporting period’s outset.
The high-grade muni yield curve as a whole rose during this reporting period, though yields at the short end of the curve rose more than yields on securities with maturities of 10 years or longer. The rise in the Treasury curve was also greater at the short end of the
curve. The Treasury curve continued to flatten during this reporting period, giving investors in government securities fewer incentives to purchase longer-maturity bonds; a flatter curve typically reflects an expectation of rising rates. The muni yield curve remained relatively flat as of July 31, 2018; it was somewhat steeper at the outset of this reporting period than at the end. As a result of the changes in the two yield curves, as of end of July, 30-year AAA-rated munis were considered cheap to 30-year Treasuries.
On a nominal basis, Treasury yields were higher than the yields on AAA-rated munis with comparable maturities as of July 31, 2018. Nonetheless, a AAA-rated muni with a maturity of 10 years would provide more income on an after-tax basis than a 10-year Treasury security for U.S. taxpayers in all but the two lowest 2018 federal tax brackets. The yields on the 30-year Treasury and AAA-rated muni were virtually identical at the end of this reporting period, meaning that nearly every taxpayer would earn more on an after-tax basis by investing in the muni versus the Treasury. Treasury bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, while municipal securities are exempt from federal income taxes and, where applicable, state and local income taxes as well.
This reporting period was also characterized by credit spread tightening, which occurs when the difference between yields on low-rated municipal bonds and higher-rated bonds decreases. As credit spreads tighten, investments in lower-rated and unrated
|
4 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
securities typically outperform municipal securities with higher credit ratings.
The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the federal oversight board established by PROMESA (the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act) continued to generate headlines throughout this reporting period; additional information about the developments in Puerto Rico can be found on our online PR Roundup (oppenheimerfunds.com/puerto-rico).
At the end of this reporting period, some 10 months after Hurricane Maria, power was not fully restored across the Commonwealth. Despite the hurricane’s impact during the final quarter of 2017, Puerto Rico’s retail sales rose 10.7% in 2017, and bonds issued by the Commonwealth (in aggregate) have rallied during this reporting period.
PREPA, the Commonwealth’s energy utilities authority, remained a focal point during this reporting period. In January 2018, creditors raised concerns about a plan to loan $1.3 billion to PREPA and the government’s proposal to privatize PREPA, among other issues; in a decision favorable to bondholders, U.S. District Court Judge Laura Taylor Swain rejected the proposed loan. Investors will recall that PREPA failed to make its July 2017 debt payment and has made no debt-service payments since. Its cash on hand continues to be more than projected, according to officials in Puerto Rico.
In July 2018, a board shakeup ensued after Gov. Ricardo Rosselló Nevares appointed Rafael Diaz-Granados as PREPA’s new executive director, replacing Walter Higgins, who held the position for four months. Diaz-Granados quit after one day over a pay dispute, and four other board members also resigned in protest. Jose Ortiz, who had previously led PRASA, the Commonwealth’s aqueduct and sewer authority, returned to PREPA; he had been the board’s chairman from 2011 to 2013. Ortiz became the fifth person to lead PREPA since the hurricane hit.
Ortiz has expressed interest in selling some of PREPA’s power plants. The governor remains an advocate for privatization, a solution that typically requires assumption of debt. He has also said the federal government is not qualified to take over the utility and has asked Congress to provide PREPA with $30 billion for modernization efforts.
At the very end of this reporting period, the oversight board established under PROMESA, the government of Puerto Rico, and certain bondholders, including OppenheimerFunds, reached a new restructuring support agreement (RSA) for PREPA debt. The pact, which has not been finalized, comes 13 months after the oversight board voted against an RSA that had been reached in September 2015 and extended numerous times. Like the earlier RSA, the new agreement is designed to reduce PREPA’s debt burden and protect the best interests of Fund shareholders.
|
5 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
As anticipated, Hurricane Maria had an adverse impact on sales and use tax (SUT) collections during fiscal year 2018, which ended June 30. At $2.52 billion for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, SUT collections were 1.2% lower than in the previous fiscal year. The ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court in
South Dakota vs. Wayfair requiring certain online retailers to collect taxes is expected to increase Puerto Rico’s sales tax collections by an estimated $40 million annually, according to Puerto Rico’s Treasury Department.
Prices on many bonds issued in Puerto Rico rose materially on news of an agreement between an agent of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and an agent of the COFINA bondholders. Negotiations are ongoing and many details need to be worked out, but a preliminary structure for a settlement was reached in mid-June 2018. Judge Swain has approved the segregating SUT collections into three separate pools, as stipulated in the agreement. Among other provisions, the agreement calls for bondholders to receive the $1.2 billion in unpaid debt service that the Bank of New York-Mellon, the COFINA trustee, has amassed. Very early in this reporting period, the Commonwealth said its deposits with the BoNY trustee had already satisfied its fiscal 2018 requirements related to the COFINA debt.
Puerto Rico did not make debt payments on its general obligation (G.O.) securities during this reporting period, despite a requirement in the Commonwealth’s Constitution that general fund revenues be used to pay G.O.
debt service ahead of any other government expense. The legal protections for our G.O. holdings have not yet been tested before a court.
In June 2018, officials in the Commonwealth’s Treasury Department said that general fund revenues for the first 11 months of fiscal year 2018 were $78.9 million, or 1%, ahead of projections. Treasury officials also said then that they anticipate that revenues for the entire fiscal year will also exceed projections, but those figures had not been released as of
July 31, 2018.
On the last day of the reporting period, the government reported that Puerto Rico’s latest cash position had reached its highest level in at least a year: As of July 20, 2018, Puerto Rico had $3.23 billion in cash, topping the high point of fiscal 2018 by more than $100 million.
In other positive economic news, the employment level in June was higher than at any time since October 2013. At 9.3%, the unemployment rate remained high relative to the U.S. rate, but was nonetheless the lowest monthly rate since at least 1975, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Puerto Rico’s Department of Labor and Human Resources, meanwhile, says the annual rate is the lowest since at least 1941.
During the reporting period, the oversight board, the Rosselló administration, legislators, and owners of Puerto Rico debt remained at odds about the extent of the board’s
|
6 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
authority, with significant debate about the budget and fiscal plan proposals that have been drafted and repeatedly revised. While it intended to certify a plan by late March, the oversight board extended the deadline and said that the new plan must demonstrate “consistency with historical actual expenditures.”
In April, the projected surplus by fiscal 2023 was raised to $6.4 billion and then to $6.7 billion. Audited results for fiscal 2015 were released in the final months of this reporting period; audited results for fiscal years 2016 and 2017 have yet to be released.
Among the ongoing issues are debt-service obligations, pensions, Law 80 (the repeal of which would allow at-will employment), and Christmas bonuses for public sector employees.
In the latter half of this reporting period, the chairman of the U.S. House committee that oversees Puerto Rico sent the governor a letter that recommended the takeover of the Commonwealth’s government by the oversight board and an increased focus on bondholder concerns. The governor fired back, calling the chairman’s letter “truly disturbing in its reckless disregard for collaboration and cooperation.”
On June 30, 2018, the oversight board certified a budget for Puerto Rico, allocating $8.76 billion for the general fund and $20.7 billion for the consolidated budget. The next month, both the governor and
legislative leaders filed lawsuits claiming that the oversight board was overstepping its authority. These suits followed the board’s rejection of the budget that the Legislature had passed. The oversight board cited the PROMESA provisions that allow it to impose its own budget if the government does not submit a compliant budget; government officials, meanwhile, argue that the board is trying to set public policy.
Clearly, the situation remains dynamic. All issuers can be affected positively or adversely by economic and fiscal conditions: were the economic situation in Puerto Rico to worsen, for example, then the performance of Rochester municipal funds that hold Puerto Rican debt, including this Fund, may be adversely affected. Our team continues to believe that the best interests of all stakeholders can be met through negotiated settlements that offer Puerto Rico a path forward, strengthen its economy and improve the quality of life of its residents while providing investors with an appropriate return.
FUND PERFORMANCE
Oppenheimer Rochester High Yield Municipal Fund held more than 1295 securities as of July 31, 2018. The Fund was invested in a broad range of sectors, providing shareholders with a diversity of holdings that we believe would be difficult and costly to replicate in an individual portfolio.
|
7 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
During this reporting period, a rally in U.S. equities and persistent low interest rates put pressure on the dividends of many fixed income investments. This Fund’s Class A dividend, which was 3.3 cents per share at the outset of this reporting period, was reduced to 3.1 cents per share beginning with the November 2017 payout, and again to 3.0 cents per share beginning with the February 2018 payout. In all, the Fund distributed 37.2 cents per Class A share this reporting period. Shareholders should note that market conditions during this reporting period did not affect the Fund’s overall investment goals or cause it to pay any capital gain distributions.
Six of the Fund’s 10 largest sectors were among the 10 strongest sectors this reporting period. The Fund’s performance this reporting period was primarily driven by its holdings of tobacco bonds. These high-yielding securities, which are backed by proceeds from the landmark 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA), were also the Fund’s largest sector as of July 31, 2018. The sales tax revenue sector was the second largest sector and strongest performer this reporting period. Debt-service payments on securities in this sector, over half of which were issued in Puerto Rico, are paid using the issuing municipality’s sales tax revenue. The Fund’s fifth through eighth-largest sectors (Special Assessment, adult living facilities, education, and hospital/ healthcare, respectively) were also ranked among the 10 best-performing sectors.
Research-based security selection continued to be a factor in the strong performance
of these sectors. Securities in the special assessment sector, the Fund’s third strongest contributor to performance, are land development (or “dirt”) bonds, which help finance the infrastructure needs of new real estate development.
Securities in the adult living facilities sector, the Fund’s fifth strongest contributor to performance, finance various projects at senior living centers and tend to perform well in densely populated geographies with strong real estate values and in more rural areas with stable home prices. Most of the securities in the hospital/healthcare sector, the Fund’s eighth strongest contributor to performance, are investment grade, though the Fund also invests across the credit spectrum in this sector. Bonds in the education sector, the Fund’s tenth-strongest performer this reporting period, primarily finance the infrastructure needs of a variety of charter schools around the state.
A number of sectors detracted slightly from the Fund’s performance this reporting period, though in aggregate performance was reduced less than 1 percentage point by the underperforming sectors. The list of detractors as of July 31, 2018, includes G.O. bonds (the Fund’s third largest), as well as municipal leases, student housing, correctional facilities, single-family housing; oil, gas & consumable fuels; and transportation infrastructure. Many of these sectors were adversely affected by pricing pressure, which was prevalent among high quality muni securities.
|
8 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
The Fund’s investments in securities issued in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are exempt from federal, state, and local income taxes, and the Fund’s holdings as of July 31, 2018 included securities from many different sectors. Investors should note that some of this Fund’s investments in securities issued in Puerto Rico are insured. A complete listing of securities held by this Fund can be found in this report’s Statement of Investments.
INVESTMENT STRATEGY
The Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Management Team focuses exclusively on municipal bonds, and this Fund invests primarily in investment-grade municipal securities. This high yield fund has neither a maturity cap nor a limit on below-investment-grade securities, or “junk” bonds.
In closing, we believe that the structure and sector composition of this Fund and the use of time-tested strategies will continue to benefit fixed income investors through interest rate and economic cycles.
| | |
| | ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g590570dsp9a.jpg)
Scott S. Cottier, CFA Senior Vice President, Senior Portfolio Manager and Team Leader |
Scott S. Cottier has been named portfolio manager of the Fund. With support as needed from the Oppenheimer Municipal Fund Management Team, Scott will continue to adhere to a consistent investment approach based on the belief that tax-free yield can help investors achieve their long-term financial objectives even when market conditions fluctuate. The Fund will not be managed based on predictions of interest rate changes. Further details about the Rochester team’s investment approach can be found on our landing page, oppenheimerfunds.com/rochesterway.
|
9 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
Top Holdings and Allocations
| | | | |
TOP TEN CATEGORIES | | | | |
Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement | | | 15.4% | |
Sales Tax Revenue | | | 8.2 | |
General Obligation | | | 8.2 | |
Special Tax | | | 5.4 | |
Special Assessment | | | 5.3 | |
Adult Living Facilities | | | 4.6 | |
Education | | | 4.6 | |
Hospital/Healthcare | | | 4.5 | |
Electric Utilities | | | 4.4 | |
U.S. Government Obligations | | | 4.3 | |
Portfolio holdings and allocations are subject to change. Percentages are as of July 31, 2018 and are based on total assets.
CREDIT ALLOCATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | NRSRO- Rated | | | Sub- Adviser- Rated | | | Total | |
AAA | | | 10.4% | | | | 2.4% | | | | 12.8% | |
AA | | | 19.7 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 19.7 | |
A | | | 6.4 | | | | 0.0 | | | | 6.4 | |
BBB | | | 10.0 | | | | 2.5 | | | | 12.5 | |
BB or lower | | | 21.6 | | | | 27.0 | | | | 48.6 | |
Total | | | 68.1% | | | | 31.9% | | | | 100.0% | |
The percentages above are based on the market value of the securities as of July 31, 2018 and are subject to change. OppenheimerFunds, Inc. determines the credit allocation of the Fund’s assets using ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (NRSROs), such as S&P Global Ratings (S&P). For any security rated by an NRSRO other than S&P, the sub-adviser, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., converts that security’s rating to the equivalent S&P rating. If two or more NRSROs have assigned a rating to a security, the highest rating is used. For securities not rated by an NRSRO, the sub-adviser uses its own credit analysis to assign ratings in categories similar to those of S&P. The use of similar categories is not an indication that the sub-adviser’s credit analysis process is consistent or comparable with any NRSRO’s process were that NRSRO to rate the same security.
For the purposes of this Credit Allocation table, securities rated within the NRSROs’ four highest categories—AAA, AA, A, and BBB—are investment-grade securities. For further details, please consult the Fund’s prospectus or Statement of Additional Information.
|
10 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
Performance
| | | | | | | | |
DISTRIBUTION YIELDS | | | | | |
As of 7/31/18 | |
| | Without Sales Charge | | | With Sales Charge | |
Class A | | | 4.92% | | | | 4.68% | |
Class C | | | 4.34 | | | | N/A | |
Class Y | | | 5.15 | | | | N/A | |
| | | | | | | | |
STANDARDIZED YIELDS | | | | | |
For the 30 Days Ended 7/31/18 | |
Class A | | | 3.12% | | | | | |
Class C | | | 2.63 | | | | | |
Class Y | | | 3.53 | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
TAXABLE EQUIVALENT YIELDS | | | | |
As of 7/31/18 | |
Class A | | 4.95% | | | | |
Class C | | 4.17 | | | | |
Class Y | | 5.60 | | | | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITHOUT SALES CHARGE AS OF 7/31/18
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Inception Date | | | 1-Year | | | 5-Year | | | 10-Year | | | Since Inception | |
Class A (ORNAX) | | | 10/1/93 | | | | 6.34% | | | | 7.92% | | | | 5.38% | | | | 4.75% | |
Class C (ORNCX) | | | 8/29/95 | | | | 5.68 | | | | 7.14 | | | | 4.60 | | | | 4.06 | |
Class Y (ORNYX) | | | 11/29/10 | | | | 6.61 | | | | 8.11 | | | | N/A | | | | 7.90 | |
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS WITH SALES CHARGE AS OF 7/31/18 | | | | | |
| | Inception Date | | | 1-Year | | | 5-Year | | | 10-Year | | | Since Inception | |
Class A (ORNAX) | | | 10/1/93 | | | | 1.29% | | | | 6.87% | | | | 4.87% | | | | 4.55% | |
Class C (ORNCX) | | | 8/29/95 | | | | 4.68 | | | | 7.14 | | | | 4.60 | | | | 4.06 | |
Class Y (ORNYX) | | | 11/29/10 | | | | 6.61 | | | | 8.11 | | | | N/A | | | | 7.90 | |
|
11 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
COMPARISON OF CHANGE IN VALUE OF $10,000 HYPOTHETICAL INVESTMENTS IN:
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g590570page12.jpg)
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which does not guarantee future results. The investment return and principal value of an investment in the Fund will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Returns do not consider capital gains or income taxes on an individual’s investments. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit oppenheimerfunds.com or call 1.800. CALL OPP (225.5677). Fund returns include changes in share price, reinvested distributions, and the applicable sales charge: for Class A shares, the current maximum initial sales charge of 4.75%; for Class C, the contingent deferred sales charge of 1% for the 1-year period. There is no sales charge for Class Y shares.
The Fund’s performance is compared to the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index, an index of a broad range of investment-grade municipal bonds that measures the performance of the general municipal bond market. The Fund’s performance is also compared to the Consumer Price Index, a non-securities index that measures changes in the inflation rate. Indices are unmanaged and cannot be purchased by investors. While index comparisons may be useful to provide a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, it must be noted that the Fund’s investments are not limited to the investments comprising the index. Index performance includes reinvestment of income, but does not reflect transaction costs, fees, expenses, or taxes. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only as a benchmark for the Fund’s performance, and does not predict or depict performance of the Fund. The Fund’s performance reflects the effects of the Fund’s business and operating expenses.
Distribution yields for Class A shares are based on dividends of $0.030 for the 28-day accrual period ended July 24, 2018. The yield without sales charge for Class A shares is calculated by dividing annualized dividends by the Class A net asset value (NAV) on July 24, 2018; for the yield with charge, the denominator is the Class A maximum offering price on that date. Distribution yields for Class C and Y are annualized based on dividends of $0.0263 and $0.0314, respectively, for the 28-day accrual period ended July 24, 2018 and on the corresponding net asset values on that date.
|
12 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
Standardized yield is based on an SEC-standardized formula designed to approximate the Fund’s annualized hypothetical current income from securities less expenses for the 30-day period ended July 31, 2018 and that date’s maximum offering price (for Class A shares) or net asset value (for all other share classes). Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields. The unsubsidized standardized yield is computed under an SEC-standardized formula based on net income earned for the 30-day period ended July 31, 2018. The calculation excludes any expense reimbursements and thus may result in a lower yield.
The average distribution yield in this Fund’s Lipper category was calculated based on the distributions and the final NAVs of the reporting period for the funds in each category. The average yield at NAV in Lipper’s High Yield Municipal Debt Funds category is based on 181 NAVs, one for each class of each fund in the category; a fund can have up to 4 classes. Lipper yields do not include sales charges, which – if included – would reduce results.
Taxable equivalent yield is based on the standardized yield and the 2018 top federal 37.00%. Calculations factor in the 3.8% tax on unearned income under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as applicable. A portion of the Fund’s distributions may be subject to tax; distributions may also increase an investor’s exposure to the alternative minimum tax. Capital gains distributions are taxable as capital gains. Tax treatments of the Fund’s distributions and capital gains may vary by state; investors should consult a tax advisor to determine if the Fund is appropriate for them. Each result is compounded semiannually and annualized. Falling share prices artificially increase yields. This Report must be preceded or accompanied by a Fund prospectus.
Investments in “tobacco bonds,” which are backed by the proceeds a state or territory receives from the 1998 national litigation settlement with tobacco manufacturers, may be vulnerable to economic and/or legislative events that affect issuers in a particular municipal market sector. Annual payments by MSA-participating manufacturers, for example, hinge on many factors, including annual domestic cigarette shipments, inflation and the relative market share of non-participating manufacturers. To date, we believe consumption figures remain within an acceptable range of the assumptions used to structure MSA bonds. Future MSA payments could be reduced if consumption were to fall more rapidly than originally forecast.
The ICE BofA Merrill Lynch AAA Municipal Securities index is the AAA subset of the ICE BofA Merrill Lynch US Municipal Securities Index, which tracks the performance of dollar-denominated, investment-grade, tax-exempt debt issued by U.S. states and territories and their political subdivisions; index constituents are weighted based on capitalization, and accrued interest is calculated assuming next-day settlement.
The views in the Fund Performance Discussion represent the opinions of this Fund’s portfolio manager and are not intended as investment advice or to predict or depict the performance of any investment. These views are as of the close of business on July 31, 2018 and are subject to change based on subsequent developments. The Fund’s portfolio and strategies are subject to change.
Before investing in any of the Oppenheimer funds, investors should carefully consider a fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. Fund prospectuses and summary prospectuses contain this and other information about the funds, and may be obtained by asking your financial advisor, visiting
|
13 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
oppenheimerfunds.com, or calling 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677). Read prospectuses and summary prospectuses carefully before investing.
Shares of Oppenheimer funds are not deposits or obligations of any bank, are not guaranteed by any bank, are not insured by the FDIC or any other agency and involve investment risks, including the possible loss of the principal amount invested.
|
14 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
Fund Expenses
Fund Expenses. As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, which may include sales charges (loads) on purchase payments and/or contingent deferred sales charges on redemptions; and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution and service fees; and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.
The examples are based on an investment of $1,000.00 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire 6-month period ended July 31, 2018.
Actual Expenses. The first section of the table provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section for the class of shares you hold, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expense that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000.00 (for example, an $8,600.00 account value divided by $1,000.00 = 8.60), then multiply the result by the number in the first section under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended July 31, 2018” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes. The second section of the table provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio for each class of shares, and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year for each class before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example for the class of shares you hold with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transactional costs, such as front-end or contingent deferred sales charges (loads). Therefore, the “hypothetical” section of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.
|
15 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | |
Actual | | Beginning Account Value February 1, 2018 | | Ending Account Value July 31, 2018 | | Expenses Paid During 6 Months Ended July 31, 2018 |
Class A | | $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,079.30 | | $ 5.38 |
Class C | | 1,000.00 | | 1,076.20 | | 8.79 |
Class Y | | 1,000.00 | | 1,080.70 | | 4.14 |
| | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | |
(5% return before expenses) | | | | | | |
Class A | | 1,000.00 | | 1,019.64 | | 5.22 |
Class C | | 1,000.00 | | 1,016.36 | | 8.53 |
Class Y | | 1,000.00 | | 1,020.83 | | 4.02 |
Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio for that class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 181/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). Those annualized expense ratios, excluding indirect expenses from affiliated funds, based on the 6-month period ended July 31, 2018 are as follows:
| | | | |
Class | | Expense Ratios | |
Class A | | | 1.04% | |
Class C | | | 1.70 | |
Class Y | | | 0.80 | |
|
16 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS July 31, 2018
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes—113.6% | |
Alabama—4.4% | |
$5,000,000 | | AL Economic Settlement Authority (BP Exploration & Production)1 | | | 4.000 | % | | | 09/15/2033 | | | $ | 5,146,650 | |
2,710,000 | | AL Port Authority (Alabama Docks Dept.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2028 | | | | 3,087,747 | |
2,380,000 | | AL Port Authority (Alabama Docks Dept.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2029 | | | | 2,699,634 | |
12,870,000 | | Birmingham-Jefferson, AL Civic Center Authority1,2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2048 | | | | 14,416,331 | |
18,120,000 | | Birmingham-Jefferson, AL Civic Center Authority2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 20,377,027 | |
4,500,000 | | Homewood, AL Educational Building Authority (Samford University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 4,951,305 | |
21,895,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 10/01/2039 | | | | 18,890,130 | |
30,000,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 10/01/2046 | | | | 25,791,000 | |
20,045,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 10/01/2046 | | | | 17,505,699 | |
44,050,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 10/01/2050 | | | | 37,793,138 | |
17,500,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 10/01/2050 | | | | 15,275,225 | |
5,000,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 10/01/2053 | | | | 5,562,100 | |
51,500,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 10/01/2053 | | | | 60,376,540 | |
25,000,000 | | Jefferson County, AL Sewer1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 10/01/2051 | | | | 30,090,750 | |
500,000 | | Mobile, AL Improvement District (McGowin Park)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2030 | | | | 512,795 | |
1,300,000 | | Mobile, AL Improvement District (McGowin Park)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 1,331,746 | |
6,550,000 | | Selma, AL Industrial Devel. Board (International Paper Company)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 11/01/2033 | | | | 6,904,290 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 270,712,107 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alaska—0.3% | |
1,650,000 | | AK Industrial Devel. & Export Authority Community Provider (Boys & Girls Home)4,6 | | | 5.875 | | | | 12/01/2027 | | | | 111,375 | |
500,000 | | AK Industrial Devel. & Export Authority Community Provider (Boys & Girls Home)4,6 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 33,750 | |
1,755,000 | | AK Municipal Bond Bank Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2030 | | | | 1,966,618 | |
1,365,000 | | AK Municipal Bond Bank Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2031 | | | | 1,525,374 | |
1,960,000 | | AK Municipal Bond Bank Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 2,184,263 | |
2,055,000 | | AK Municipal Bond Bank Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2033 | | | | 2,282,262 | |
10,350,000 | | Koyukuk, AK (Tanana Chiefs Conference Health Care Facility)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 10/01/2041 | | | | 11,069,532 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 19,173,174 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Arizona—1.5% | |
580,000 | | AZ IDA (Franklin Phonetic Charter School)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 564,033 | |
680,000 | | AZ IDA (Franklin Phonetic Charter School)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 667,740 | |
645,000 | | AZ IDA (Franklin Phonetic Charter School)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 07/01/2052 | | | | 639,801 | |
3,603,000 | | Buckeye, AZ Watson Road Community Facilities District | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 3,473,148 | |
3,180,000 | | East San Luis, AZ Community Facilities District Special Assessment (Area One)5,6 | | | 6.375 | | | | 01/01/2028 | | | | 1,812,600 | |
140,000 | | East San Luis, AZ Community Facilities District Special Assessment (Area Two)5,6 | | | 8.500 | | | | 01/01/2028 | | | | 70,000 | |
2,500,000 | | Glendale, AZ IDA (Beatitudes Campus)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2045 | | | | 2,569,000 | |
|
17 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Arizona (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$7,225,000 | | Maricopa County, AZ IDA (Christian Care Surprise) | | | 6.000 | % | | | 01/01/2048 | | | $ | 7,387,201 | |
220,000 | | Maricopa County, AZ IDA (Greathearts Arizona)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 248,492 | |
405,000 | | Maricopa County, AZ IDA (Greathearts Arizona)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 453,138 | |
1,870,000 | | Maricopa County, AZ IDA (Immanuel Campus Care)5,6 | | | 8.500 | | | | 04/20/2041 | | | | 1,290,300 | |
294,000 | | Merrill Ranch, AZ Community Facilities District No. 1 Special Assessment Lien1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 294,376 | |
435,000 | | Merrill Ranch, AZ Community Facilities District No. 21 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/15/2040 | | | | 482,976 | |
262,000 | | Merrill Ranch, AZ Community Facilities District No. 2 Special Assessment Lien1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 262,335 | |
641,000 | | Merrill Ranch, AZ Community Facilities District No. 2 Special Assessment Lien1 | | | 5.300 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 641,647 | |
420,000 | | Parkway, AZ Community Facilities District No. 1 (Prescott Valley) | | | 5.300 | | | | 07/15/2025 | | | | 393,040 | |
350,000 | | Parkway, AZ Community Facilities District No. 1 (Prescott Valley) | | | 5.350 | | | | 07/15/2031 | | | | 307,842 | |
1,000,000 | | Phoenix, AZ IDA (Downtown Phoenix Student Hsg.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 1,099,190 | |
1,650,000 | | Phoenix, AZ IDA (Espiritu Community Devel. Corp.) | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 1,641,107 | |
4,135,000 | | Phoenix, AZ IDA (Freedom Academy)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 4,284,976 | |
1,935,000 | | Phoenix, AZ IDA (Gourmet Boutique West)6 | | | 5.875 | | | | 11/01/2037 | | | | 1,581,321 | |
5,530,000 | | Phoenix, AZ IDA (Milestone Charter School) | | | 6.500 | | | | 11/01/2047 | | | | 5,388,211 | |
2,970,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (American Leadership Academy)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2052 | | | | 2,979,148 | |
1,550,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (Christian Care Tucson)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 1,706,225 | |
2,830,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (Christian Care Tucson)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 3,100,690 | |
2,400,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (Excalibur Charter School)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/01/2046 | | | | 2,356,104 | |
2,955,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (New Plan Learning/OG Ohio/250 Shoup Mill Obligated Group)1 | | | 8.125 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 2,980,029 | |
3,315,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (P.L.C. Charter Schools)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 3,483,037 | |
6,310,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (P.L.C. Charter Schools)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 6,565,050 | |
5,730,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (P.L.C. Charter Schools)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 04/01/2041 | | | | 6,846,777 | |
1,025,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (Paideia Academies)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,044,065 | |
3,310,000 | | Pima County, AZ IDA (Paideia Academies)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 07/01/2045 | | | | 3,366,601 | |
500,000 | | Pinal County, AZ IDA (San Manuel Facility)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 06/01/2026 | | | | 506,365 | |
1,022,000 | | Prescott Valley, AZ Southside Community Facilities District No. 1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 07/01/2032 | | | | 616,889 | |
10,000,000 | | Salt River, AZ Agricultural Improvement & Power District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 11,647,300 | |
245,000 | | Show Low Bluff, AZ Community Facilities District | | | 5.600 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 218,623 | |
1,000,000 | | Tartesso West, AZ Community Facilities District1 | | | 5.900 | | | | 07/15/2032 | | | | 987,840 | |
1,010,000 | | Tempe, AZ IDA (Mirabella at ASUN)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 1,104,415 | |
2,360,000 | | Tempe, AZ IDA (Mirabella at ASUN)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 10/01/2052 | | | | 2,582,147 | |
695,000 | | Tempe, AZ IDA (Tempe Life Care Village)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 743,490 | |
1,550,000 | | Tempe, AZ IDA (Tempe Life Care Village)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 12/01/2042 | | | | 1,661,135 | |
675,000 | | Verrado, AZ Community Facilities District No. 11 | | | 5.700 | | | | 07/15/2029 | | | | 715,811 | |
|
18 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Arizona (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,800,000 | | Verrado, AZ Community Facilities District No. 11 | | | 6.000 | % | | | 07/15/2027 | | | $ | 1,941,804 | |
610,000 | | Verrado, AZ Community Facilities District No. 11 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/15/2033 | | | | 647,424 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 93,353,443 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Arkansas—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5,470,000 | | Cave Springs, AR Municipal Property (Creeks Special Sewer District)4,6 | | | 6.250 | | | | 02/01/2038 | | | | 3,993,100 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
California—13.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2,500,000 | | Adelanto, CA Public Utility Authority1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 2,621,450 | |
7,300,000 | | Alameda, CA Corridor Transportation Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2034 | | | | 8,293,311 | |
750,000 | | Alhambra, CA (Atherton Baptist Homes)1 | | | 7.625 | | | | 01/01/2040 | | | | 814,455 | |
50,000 | | Beaumont, CA Financing Authority, Series C1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2022 | | | | 50,052 | |
180,000 | | Blythe, CA Redevel. Agency (Redevel. Project No. 1 Tax Allocation)1 | | | 6.200 | | | | 05/01/2031 | | | | 180,052 | |
5,500,000 | | Brea, CA Community Facilities District (Brea Plaza Area)1 | | | 7.375 | | | | 09/01/2039 | | | | 5,839,405 | |
127,310,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 5.307 | 7 | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 21,245,493 | |
107,400,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 5.502 | 7 | | | 06/01/2050 | | | | 10,926,876 | |
212,950,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 6.341 | 7 | | | 06/01/2055 | | | | 10,920,076 | |
33,920,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 6.647 | 7 | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 5,107,334 | |
215,100,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 6.998 | 7 | | | 06/01/2055 | | | | 12,753,279 | |
7,165,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency | | | 8.145 | 7 | | | 06/01/2033 | | | | 3,083,458 | |
7,000,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC) | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 6,999,510 | |
275,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/01/2033 | | | | 279,078 | |
520,920,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC) | | | 5.559 | 7 | | | 06/01/2050 | | | | 73,225,724 | |
18,500,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 5.650 | 3 | | | 06/01/2041 | | | | 18,611,000 | |
18,030,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 5.700 | 3 | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 18,111,856 | |
2,775,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 2,803,860 | |
7,285,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 06/01/2043 | | | | 7,390,414 | |
19,120,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2042 | | | | 19,308,714 | |
5,000,000 | | CA County Tobacco Securitization Agency (TASC)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 06/01/2038 | | | | 5,000,850 | |
9,125,000 | | CA Enterprise Devel. Authority (Sunpower Corp.) | | | 8.500 | | | | 04/01/2031 | | | | 9,735,463 | |
16,780,000 | | CA GO8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2033 | | | | 18,111,619 | |
24,160,000 | | CA GO8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2034 | | | | 25,895,604 | |
20,000,000 | | CA GO8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2035 | | | | 21,287,750 | |
3,740,000 | | CA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2030 | | | | 4,472,516 | |
2,160,000 | | CA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2031 | | | | 2,544,199 | |
15,845,000 | | CA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2033 | | | | 18,738,772 | |
10,000,000 | | CA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2039 | | | | 11,470,500 | |
555,000 | | CA Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. (TASC)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2029 | | | | 636,818 | |
10,000,000 | | CA Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. (TASC)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 11,336,000 | |
5,350,000 | | CA Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp. (TASC)1 | | | 5.300 | 3 | | | 06/01/2037 | | | | 5,592,516 | |
30,420,000 | | CA Health Facilities Financing Authority (SJHS/ SJHCN/SJHE/SJHO Obligated Group)8 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 31,594,323 | |
|
19 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
California (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,835,000 | | CA Independent Cities Finance Authority Mobile Home Park (Lamplighter Salinas)1 | | | 6.250 | % | | | 07/15/2050 | | | $ | 1,939,742 | |
10,000,000 | | CA Infrastructure and Economic Devel. (SanfordConsortium)8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2040 | | | | 10,631,700 | |
1,710,000 | | CA Infrastructure and Economic Devel. (University of California)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2052 | | | | 1,968,330 | |
5,000,000 | | CA Municipal Finance Authority (CHCC/FCHMC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2047 | | | | 5,527,800 | |
750,000 | | CA Municipal Finance Authority (Harbor Regional Center)1 | | | 8.500 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 814,800 | |
20,800,000 | | CA Municipal Finance Authority (Lax Integrated Express Solutions)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/31/2043 | | | | 23,337,808 | |
2,750,000 | | CA Municipal Finance Authority (Lax Integrated Express Solutions)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/31/2047 | | | | 3,073,317 | |
2,575,000 | | CA Municipal Finance Authority (Lax Integrated Express Solutions)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2048 | | | | 2,866,619 | |
3,000,000 | | CA Pollution Control Financing Authority (Aemerge Redpak Services Southern CA) | | | 8.000 | | | | 12/01/2027 | | | | 3,006,300 | |
6,075,000 | | CA Pollution Control Financing Authority (Calplant I) | | | 7.500 | | | | 07/01/2032 | | | | 6,281,671 | |
14,995,000 | | CA Pollution Control Financing Authority (Calplant I) | | | 8.000 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 15,996,066 | |
60,000 | | CA Public Works1 | | | 6.625 | | | | 11/01/2034 | | | | 60,116 | |
5,945,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (Grimmway Schools)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2051 | | | | 6,127,036 | |
385,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (Kepler Neighborhood School) | | | 5.000 | | �� | | 05/01/2027 | | | | 366,351 | |
900,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (Kepler Neighborhood School) | | | 5.750 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 862,101 | |
1,230,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (Kepler Neighborhood School) | | | 5.875 | | | | 05/01/2047 | | | | 1,167,073 | |
595,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (RE/ REW/RLSA/RDP/RRCP/RSCP/RNNE/RMS/RSSPA/ RBM/RSA Obligated Group) | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 621,674 | |
665,000 | | CA School Finance Authority Charter School (RE/ REW/RLSA/RDP/RRCP/RSCP/RNNE/RMS/RSSPA/ RBM/RSA Obligated Group) | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2052 | | | | 695,783 | |
4,330,000 | | CA School Finance Authority School Facility (Escuela Popular Del Pueblo) | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2050 | | | | 4,347,103 | |
61,600,000 | | CA Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority | | | 8.146 | 7 | | | 06/01/2056 | | | | 4,991,448 | |
58,990,000 | | CA Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority | | | 8.898 | 7 | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 10,941,465 | |
60,785,000 | | CA Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority | | | 8.995 | 7 | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 22,607,765 | |
13,505,000 | | CA Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority | | | 8.998 | 7 | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 2,287,882 | |
25,920,000 | | CA State University8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2047 | | | | 29,752,272 | |
1,145,000 | | CA Statewide CDA (Albert Einstein Academy)5,6 | | | 6.000 | | | | 11/01/2032 | | | | 1,030,500 | |
1,730,000 | | CA Statewide CDA (Albert Einstein Academy)5,6 | | | 6.250 | | | | 11/01/2042 | | | | 1,557,000 | |
10,000 | | CA Statewide CDA (Escrow Term)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 09/01/2037 | | | | 10,012 | |
4,020,000 | | CA Statewide CDA (Guidance Charter School)6 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 2,412,000 | |
14,690,000 | | CA Statewide CDA (Guidance Charter School)6 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2052 | | | | 8,814,000 | |
|
20 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
California (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$2,019,578 | | CA Statewide CDA (Microgy Holdings)5,6 | | | 9.000 | % | | | 12/01/2038 | | | $ | 20 | |
7,900,000 | | CA Statewide CDA (Yucaipa Valley Water Reservoir) | | | 6.000 | | | | 09/02/2044 | | | | 7,842,646 | |
4,515,000 | | CA Statewide Financing Authority Tobacco Settlement (TASC)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 4,517,980 | |
100,000 | | CA Statewide Financing Authority Tobacco Settlement (TASC)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2043 | | | | 100,029 | |
1,120,000 | | CA Statewide Financing Authority Tobacco Settlement (TASC)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2043 | | | | 1,120,325 | |
2,500,000 | | Calexico, CA Community Redevel. Agency Tax Allocation (Central Business District & Residential Redevel.)1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 08/01/2033 | | | | 2,847,850 | |
1,440,000 | | Coyote Canyon, CA Public Facilities Community Facilities District No. 2004-11 | | | 6.625 | | | | 09/01/2039 | | | | 1,520,554 | |
1,215,000 | | Desert Hot Springs, CA Redevel. Agency Tax Allocation1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2030 | | | | 1,410,020 | |
18,275,000 | | Fremont, CA Union High School District8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 18,823,994 | |
7,780,000 | | Fresno, CA Unified School District | | | 4.319 | 7 | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 2,910,187 | |
1,205,000 | | Lathrop, CA Special Tax Community Facilities District No. 03-21 | | | 7.000 | | | | 09/01/2033 | | | | 1,208,374 | |
4,000,000 | | Long Beach, CA Harbor Revenue1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2043 | | | | 4,524,560 | |
21,000,000 | | Los Angeles CA Dept Wtr & Pwr Revenue8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 24,544,310 | |
7,420,000 | | Los Angeles County, CA Redevel. Refunding Authority (Long Beach Project Area)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 8,481,134 | |
1,625,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Community Facilities District Special Tax (Legends at Cascades)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 09/01/2040 | | | | 1,660,555 | |
1,500,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Airports (Los Angeles International Airport)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2033 | | | | 1,696,860 | |
1,000,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Airports (Los Angeles International Airport)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 1,151,070 | |
1,385,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Airports (Los Angeles International Airport)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2036 | | | | 1,589,218 | |
5,000,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Water & Power8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2034 | | | | 5,073,038 | |
2,900,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Water & Power1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 3,398,510 | |
7,555,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Regional Airports Improvement Corp. (Delta-Continental Airlines)1,2 | | | 9.250 | | | | 08/01/2024 | | | | 7,604,108 | |
2,105,000 | | Madera, CA Redevel. Agency1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2034 | | | | 2,486,931 | |
255,000 | | Maywood, CA Public Financing Authority1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 09/01/2038 | | | | 255,344 | |
10,000,000 | | Northern CA Tobacco Securitization Authority (TASC)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 06/01/2038 | | | | 10,053,900 | |
45,000 | | Placer County, CA Improvement Bond Act 19151 | | | 6.500 | | | | 09/02/2030 | | | | 45,016 | |
3,975,000 | | Rialto, CA Redevel. Agency (Merged Project Area)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2037 | | | | 4,635,725 | |
21,711,000 | | River Rock, CA Entertainment Authority5 | | | 8.000 | | | | 11/01/2018 | | | | 7,924,515 | |
1,750,000 | | Riverside County, CA Redevel. Agency1 | | | 7.125 | | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 2,040,588 | |
27,015,000 | | Riverside County, CA Transportation Commission8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 28,566,624 | |
2,000,000 | | San Buenaventura, CA Community Memorial Health Systems1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 12/01/2031 | | | | 2,279,120 | |
|
21 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
California (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$31,370,000 | | San Francisco, CA City & County Airports Commission (San Francisco International Airport)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 05/01/2046 | | | $ | 34,874,656 | |
750,000 | | San Francisco, CA City & County Redevel. Financing Authority (Mission Bay North Redevel.)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 846,353 | |
1,000,000 | | San Francisco, CA City & County Redevel. Financing Authority (Mission Bay North Redevel.)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 1,134,580 | |
15,920,000 | | Santa Clara County, CA GO8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 16,458,295 | |
6,000,000 | | Santa Clara, CA Redevel. Agency Tax Allocation (Bayshore North)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 06/01/2026 | | | | 6,696,840 | |
12,115,000 | | Stockton, CA Unified School District | | | 5.918 | 7 | | | 08/01/2038 | | | | 5,541,401 | |
14,735,000 | | Stockton, CA Unified School District | | | 5.948 | 7 | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 5,913,008 | |
17,145,000 | | Stockton, CA Unified School District | | | 5.948 | 7 | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 6,292,901 | |
6,245,000 | | Stockton, CA Unified School District | | | 5.997 | 7 | | | 08/01/2037 | | | | 2,998,225 | |
1,335,000 | | Susanville, CA Public Financing Authority (Utility Enterprises)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 1,375,637 | |
1,425,000 | | Susanville, CA Public Financing Authority (Utility Enterprises)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2045 | | | | 1,467,408 | |
11,000,000 | | University of California1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2043 | | | | 12,802,570 | |
15,000,000 | | University of California1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2048 | | | | 17,375,400 | |
3,500,000 | | West Hollywood, CA Community Devel. Commission Tax Allocation (East Side Redevel.)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 09/01/2042 | | | | 4,072,250 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 847,240,690 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Colorado—2.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,075,000 | | Amber Creek, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.125 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,074,108 | |
515,000 | | Amber Creek, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 514,928 | |
2,500,000 | | Arkansas River, CO Power Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2043 | | | | 2,768,650 | |
3,100,000 | | Base Village, CO Metropolitan District No. 21 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 3,120,956 | |
500,000 | | Blue Lake, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 8.000 | | | | 12/15/2046 | | | | 506,870 | |
1,750,000 | | Blue Lake, CO Metropolitan District No. 31 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 1,753,377 | |
551,000 | | BNC, CO Metropolitan District No. 1 | | | 7.375 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 556,350 | |
670,000 | | Brighton Crossing, CO Metropolitan District No. 4 | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 663,883 | |
1,000,000 | | Bromley Park, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 6.375 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 1,001,760 | |
2,734,000 | | Buffalo Ridge, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.375 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 2,746,522 | |
1,345,000 | | Cherrylane, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,355,733 | |
574,000 | | Cherrylane, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.375 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 576,629 | |
500,000 | | Clear Creek Station, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 7.375 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 503,450 | |
4,500,000 | | CO Canyons Metropolitan District No. 5 | | | 6.125 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 4,596,660 | |
2,000,000 | | CO Canyons Metropolitan District No. 6 | | | 6.125 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 2,001,540 | |
1,025,000 | | CO Country Club Highlands Metropolitan District4,6 | | | 7.250 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 871,250 | |
2,600,000 | | CO Elbert and Highway 86 Metropolitan District1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 2,748,902 | |
4,475,000 | | CO Elbert and Highway 86 Metropolitan District4,6 | | | 7.500 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 3,356,250 | |
1,780,000 | | CO Fossil Ridge Metropolitan District No. 11 | | | 7.250 | | | | 12/01/2040 | | | | 1,864,906 | |
1,100,000 | | CO Health Facilities Authority (Catholic Health Initiatives)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2036 | | | | 1,111,715 | |
|
22 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Colorado (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$4,425,000 | | CO Health Facilities Authority (ELGS/ELGSS/ ELGSF/GSSH Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 06/01/2047 | | | $ | 4,833,826 | |
14,350,000 | | CO Health Facilities Authority (Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health System)8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2044 | | | | 15,598,665 | |
1,030,000 | | CO Health Facilities Authority Health & Residential Care Facilities (Volunteers of America)1 | | | 5.300 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,030,041 | |
1,040,000 | | CO International Center Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 7.500 | | | | 12/15/2038 | | | | 1,042,496 | |
1,945,000 | | CO Midcities Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2046 | | | | 1,941,480 | |
12,585,000 | | CO Park Valley Water and Sanitation Metropolitan District6 | | | 5.481 | 7 | | | 12/15/2017 | | | | 2,642,850 | |
1,590,000 | | CO Potomac Farms Metropolitan District | | | 7.250 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 1,502,343 | |
225,000 | | CO Potomac Farms Metropolitan District | | | 7.625 | 3 | | | 12/01/2023 | | | | 214,078 | |
494,000 | | CO Silver Peaks Metropolitan District | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 445,800 | |
1,720,000 | | CO Sorrell Ranch Metropolitan District5,6 | | | 6.750 | | | | 12/15/2036 | | | | 602,000 | |
569,000 | | CO Table Mountain Metropolitan District | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2045 | | | | 586,502 | |
8,000,000 | | CO Talon Pointe Metropolitan District5,6 | | | 8.000 | | | | 12/01/2039 | | | | 560,000 | |
500,000 | | Copperleaf, CO Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 494,470 | |
700,000 | | Copperleaf, CO Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 5.125 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 691,054 | |
506,000 | | Copperleaf, CO Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 7.625 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 500,141 | |
3,415,000 | | Cundall Farms, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 6.875 | | | | 12/01/2044 | | | | 3,630,521 | |
750,000 | | Cundall Farms, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.375 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 741,142 | |
785,000 | | Cundall Farms, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2044 | | | | 867,700 | |
792,000 | | Cundall Farms, CO Metropolitan District | | | 12.000 | | | | 12/15/2049 | | | | 783,732 | |
10,000,000 | | Denver, CO City & County Board of Water Commissioners1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/15/2047 | | | | 11,559,100 | |
1,250,000 | | Denver, CO Connection West Metropolitan District | | | 5.375 | | | | 08/01/2047 | | | | 1,254,025 | |
1,360,000 | | Denver, CO Gateway Center Metropolitan District | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 1,390,886 | |
2,130,000 | | Denver, CO Gateway Center Metropolitan District | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 2,181,716 | |
1,690,000 | | Dublin North, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 5.125 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,693,853 | |
2,000,000 | | Erie Farm, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2045 | | | | 2,035,100 | |
600,000 | | Erie Farm, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2045 | | | | 602,538 | |
2,065,000 | | Hawthorn, CO Metropolitan District No. 21 | | | 6.375 | | | | 12/01/2044 | | | | 2,193,113 | |
950,000 | | Hawthorn, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2044 | | | | 1,055,706 | |
928,000 | | Hawthorn, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 10.000 | | | | 12/15/2051 | | | | 916,391 | |
775,000 | | Iliff Commons, CO Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 787,958 | |
2,235,000 | | Interpark, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 2,225,010 | |
1,365,000 | | Interquest South, CO Business Improvement District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,352,456 | |
1,626,000 | | Lewis Pointe, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 1,634,504 | |
500,000 | | Leyden Ranch, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 509,680 | |
1,195,000 | | Leyden Rock, CO Metropolitan District No. 10 | | | 7.250 | | | | 12/15/2045 | | | | 1,191,487 | |
1,025,000 | | Leyden Rock, CO Metropolitan District No. 10 | | | 10.750 | | | | 12/15/2049 | | | | 1,012,802 | |
1,000,000 | | Mountain Shadows, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 1,015,260 | |
1,760,000 | | North Holly, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 1,759,859 | |
2,595,000 | | Prairiestar, CO Metropolitan District No. 2 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 2,703,575 | |
1,200,000 | | Sheridan Station West, CO Metropolitan District | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,196,592 | |
|
23 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Colorado (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$810,000 | | Southglenn, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 12/01/2036 | | | $ | 829,359 | |
2,000,000 | | Stone Creek, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 2,011,040 | |
600,000 | | Stone Creek, CO Metropolitan District | | | 7.875 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 603,342 | |
710,000 | | Tabernash Meadows, CO Water & Sanitation District1 | | | 7.125 | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 741,148 | |
294,000 | | Tallyns Reach, CO Metropolitan District No. 31 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2033 | | | | 310,864 | |
1,220,000 | | Tallyns Reach, CO Metropolitan District No. 3 | | | 6.750 | | | | 11/01/2038 | | | | 1,223,148 | |
750,000 | | Thompson Crossing, CO Metropolitan District No. 61 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2044 | | | | 760,492 | |
1,500,000 | | Timnath Ranch, CO Metropolitan District No. 41 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 1,506,915 | |
1,900,000 | | Timnath Ranch, CO Metropolitan District No. 41 | | | 5.375 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,909,348 | |
953,000 | | Timnath Ranch, CO Metropolitan District No. 4 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2047 | | | | 956,926 | |
1,375,000 | | Village at Southgate, CO Metropolitan District | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2048 | | | | 1,383,882 | |
1,645,000 | | Villas Eastlake Reservoir, CO Metropolitan District1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 1,715,719 | |
5,271,763 | | Woodmen Heights, CO Metropolitan District No. 11 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2041 | | | | 5,315,466 | |
20,183,519 | | Woodmen Heights, CO Metropolitan District No. 1 | | | 7.300 | 3 | | | 12/15/2041 | | | | 17,725,166 | |
1,245,000 | | York Street, CO Metropolitan District | | | 6.250 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,261,720 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 150,929,426 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Connecticut—1.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
12,500,000 | | CT GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2030 | | | | 13,131,125 | |
5,295,000 | | CT GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2031 | | | | 5,550,907 | |
18,275,000 | | CT Special Tax1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2028 | | | | 20,656,050 | |
6,000,000 | | CT Special Tax1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2032 | | | | 6,644,520 | |
7,965,000 | | CT Special Tax1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2033 | | | | 8,794,395 | |
6,515,000 | | CT Special Tax (Transportation Infrastructure)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2027 | | | | 7,260,968 | |
470,000 | | Georgetown, CT Special Taxing District5 | | | 5.125 | | | | 10/01/2036 | | | | 150,400 | |
1,580,000 | | Hartford, CT GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2033 | | | | 1,713,952 | |
12,569,079 | | Mashantucket Western Pequot Tribe CT5,9 | | | 6.050 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 392,784 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 64,295,101 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Delaware—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,100,000 | | Bridgeville, DE Special Obligation (Heritage Shores)1 | | | 5.450 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,099,901 | |
7,000,000 | | Millsboro, DE Special Obligation (Plantation Lakes)1 | | | 5.450 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 6,317,360 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 7,417,261 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
District of Columbia—2.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4,745,000 | | District of Columbia (Howard University)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 10/01/2032 | | | | 5,294,281 | |
5,255,000 | | District of Columbia (Howard University)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 10/01/2032 | | | | 5,591,635 | |
315,000 | | District of Columbia (Howard University)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 10/01/2041 | | | | 353,505 | |
19,295,000 | | District of Columbia (Howard University)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 10/01/2041 | | | | 20,581,591 | |
3,055,000 | | District of Columbia Center for Strategic & International Studies1 | | | 6.375 | | | | 03/01/2031 | | | | 3,370,551 | |
|
24 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
District of Columbia (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$2,000,000 | | District of Columbia Center for Strategic & International Studies1 | | | 6.625 | % | | | 03/01/2041 | | | $ | 2,246,540 | |
32,680,000 | | District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 05/15/2040 | | | | 33,987,200 | |
1,275,680,000 | | District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. (TASC) | | | 5.912 | 7 | | | 06/15/2055 | | | | 63,171,674 | |
1,055,000,000 | | District of Columbia Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp. (TASC) | | | 6.211 | 7 | | | 06/15/2055 | | | | 40,216,600 | |
1,000,000 | | Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airport Authority1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 10/01/2023 | | | | 1,005,920 | |
1,960,000 | | Metropolitan Washington D.C. Airport Authority1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 10/01/2034 | | | | 1,972,250 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 177,791,747 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Florida—7.7% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
750,000 | | Alachua County, FL Health Facilities Authority (Oak Hammock University Florida)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 10/01/2032 | | | | 868,515 | |
1,000,000 | | Alachua County, FL Health Facilities Authority (Oak Hammock University Florida)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 1,152,200 | |
1,000,000 | | Alachua County, FL Health Facilities Authority (Oak Hammock University Florida)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 10/01/2046 | | | | 1,148,080 | |
4,655,000 | | Amelia Concourse, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.750 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 4,329,150 | |
3,285,000 | | Amelia Concourse, FL Community Devel. District | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2047 | | | | 3,271,269 | |
5,080,000 | | Arlington Ridge, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 5,080,051 | |
1,045,000 | | Avignon Villages, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.300 | | | | 05/01/2014 | | | | 73,150 | |
755,000 | | Avignon Villages, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.400 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 52,850 | |
14,549,400 | | Baker, FL Correctional Devel. Corp. (Baker County Detention Center) | | | 8.500 | | | | 02/01/2030 | | | | 12,141,038 | |
7,555,000 | | Belle Isle, FL Charter School (Cornerstone Charter Academy & Cornerstone Charter High School Obligated Group)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 7,838,086 | |
700,000 | | Boynton Village, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 699,958 | |
5,845,000 | | Buckeye Park, FL Community Devel. District5 | | | 7.875 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 2,104,200 | |
835,000 | | Carlton Lakes, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment2 | | | 5.625 | | | | 11/01/2036 | | | | 861,303 | |
2,030,000 | | Carlton Lakes, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment2 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/01/2047 | | | | 2,091,570 | |
24,545,000 | | CFM, FL Community Devel. District, Series A5,6 | | | 6.250 | | | | 05/01/2035 | | | | 8,713,475 | |
7,075,000 | | Chapel Creek, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment5,6 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 6,367,500 | |
13,074,058 | | Clearwater Cay, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 7,452,213 | |
1,150,000 | | Collier County, FL IDA (Gulf Coast Charter Academy South)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 1,130,335 | |
1,875,000 | | Collier County, FL IDA (Gulf Coast Charter Academy South)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 1,802,400 | |
1,690,000 | | Creekside, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.200 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 692,900 | |
840,000 | | Crosscreek, FL Community Devel. District | | | 5.600 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 832,230 | |
20,000 | | Crosscreek, FL Community Devel. District4 | | | 5.600 | | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 19,425 | |
1,560,000 | | Crosscreek, FL Community Devel. District | | | 6.750 | | | | 11/30/2021 | | | | 1,569,235 | |
|
25 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Florida (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$55,000 | | Dade County, FL HFA (Golden Lakes Apartments)1 | | | 6.050 | % | | | 11/01/2039 | | | $ | 55,070 | |
700,000 | | Dade County, FL IDA (Miami Cerebral Palsy Residence)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 06/01/2022 | | | | 703,185 | |
1,940,000 | | Durbin Crossing, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment4,6 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2020 | | | | 48,500 | |
3,340,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (AHFP/AAD/AAHI/APH/ AWHC/AAHII/AW Obligated Group)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 3,261,677 | |
990,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (Elim Senior Hsg.) | | | 5.625 | | | | 08/01/2037 | | | | 1,013,503 | |
2,350,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (Elim Senior Hsg.) | | | 5.875 | | | | 08/01/2052 | | | | 2,411,875 | |
1,100,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (Viera Charter School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/15/2047 | | | | 1,103,949 | |
755,000 | | FL Capital Trust Agency (Viera Charter School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/15/2052 | | | | 748,824 | |
3,725,000 | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 3,930,955 | |
4,030,000 | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 4,245,847 | |
4,195,000 | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 4,412,469 | |
4,360,000 | | FL Dept. of Transportation (Acquisition & Bridge Construction)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 4,574,730 | |
6,045,000 | | FL Devel. Finance Corp. (Florida Charter Educational Foundation) | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2046 | | | | 5,964,178 | |
300,000 | | FL Devel. Finance Corp. (Learning Gate Community School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2038 | | | | 321,129 | |
985,000 | | FL Devel. Finance Corp. (Learning Gate Community School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2048 | | | | 1,046,375 | |
85,000 | | FL HFA (Stoddert Arms Apartments)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 09/01/2026 | | | | 85,122 | |
2,490,284 | | FL Lake Ashton II Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 2,301,022 | |
3,334,862 | | Glades, FL Correctional Devel. Corp.3 | | | 0.000 | | | | 03/01/2030 | | | | 8,371 | |
5,834,388 | | Glades, FL Correctional Devel. Corp. | | | 7.000 | | | | 03/01/2030 | | | | 4,957,479 | |
2,815,000 | | Greater Lakes/Sawgrass Bay, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 2,687,565 | |
1,615,000 | | Harbor Bay, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 05/01/2034 | | | | 1,622,106 | |
335,000 | | Highland Meadows, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment, Series A | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 334,987 | |
4,775,000 | | Indigo, FL Community Devel. District4,6 | | | 5.750 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 3,342,500 | |
15,300,000 | | Lake County, FL Senior Living (Village Veranda at Lady Lake/VVLL Properties Obligated Group) | | | 7.125 | | | | 01/01/2052 | | | | 14,927,904 | |
17,280,000 | | Lakewood Ranch, FL Stewardship District (Country Club East Investors)1 | | | 5.400 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 17,348,602 | |
1,785,000 | | Lee County, FL IDA (VOA Lee County Health Care Facility) | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2052 | | | | 1,831,481 | |
3,390,000 | | Legends Bay, FL Community Devel. District | | | 5.875 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 3,391,288 | |
5,000,000 | | Magnolia Creek, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.600 | | | | 05/01/2014 | | | | 1,050,000 | |
5,360,000 | | Magnolia Creek, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.900 | | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 1,125,600 | |
205,000 | | Magnolia West, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment1 | | | 5.350 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 204,982 | |
1,355,000 | | Main Street, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 6.800 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 1,355,691 | |
1,635,000 | | Miami, FL Special Obligation (Street & Sidewalk Program)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 01/01/2039 | | | | 1,662,288 | |
|
26 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Florida (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,715,000 | | Miami, FL World Center Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.125 | % | | | 11/01/2039 | | | $ | 1,796,548 | |
2,570,000 | | Miami, FL World Center Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2049 | | | | 2,720,653 | |
4,000,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2031 | | | | 4,477,400 | |
5,455,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2032 | | | | 6,091,980 | |
10,000,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board COP8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2027 | | | | 10,168,600 | |
10,000,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board COP8 | | | 5.250 | | | | 02/01/2027 | | | | 10,185,350 | |
50,000,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board COP8 | | | 5.375 | | | | 02/01/2034 | | | | 50,938,500 | |
7,280,234 | | Montecito, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.100 | | | | 05/01/2013 | | | | 6,989,024 | |
5,405,000 | | Montecito, FL Community Devel. District4,6 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 5,188,800 | |
9,745,000 | | Nassau County, FL (Nassau Care Centers) | | | 6.900 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 9,841,670 | |
3,640,000 | | Naturewalk, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.300 | | | | 05/01/2016 | | | | 2,875,600 | |
4,345,000 | | Naturewalk, FL Community Devel. District4,6 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 3,432,550 | |
3,000,000 | | Palm Beach County, FL Health Facilities Authority (Sinai Residences Boca Raton)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 06/01/2049 | | | | 3,450,930 | |
11,620,000 | | Palm Coast Park, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment | | | 5.700 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 11,565,851 | |
1,850,000 | | Palm River, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.150 | | | | 05/01/2013 | | | | 925,000 | |
1,565,000 | | Palm River, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 782,500 | |
1,395,000 | | Parkway Center, FL Community Devel. District, Series A1 | | | 6.300 | | | | 05/01/2034 | | | | 1,398,111 | |
5,274,584 | | Pine Ridge Plantation, FL Community Devel. District | | | 5.400 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 4,737,790 | |
2,250,000 | | Pinellas County, FL Educational Facilities Authority (Pinellas Prep Academy)1 | | | 7.125 | | | | 09/15/2041 | | | | 2,348,078 | |
9,200,000 | | Portico, FL Community Devel. District | | | 5.450 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 9,087,024 | |
5,905,000 | | Portofino Isles, FL Community Devel. District (Portofino Court)5,6 | | | 5.600 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 2,480,100 | |
530,686 | | Portofino Landings, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment5,6 | | | 5.200 | | | | 05/01/2017 | | | | 74,296 | |
1,955,000 | | Portofino Landings, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment5,6 | | | 5.400 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 938,400 | |
2,470,000 | | Portofino Vista, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2013 | | | | 1,235,000 | |
3,420,000 | | Reunion East, FL Community Devel. District4,6 | | | 5.800 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 34 | |
1,465,000 | | Reunion East, FL Community Devel. District | | | 6.600 | | | | 05/01/2033 | | | | 1,495,120 | |
3,485,000 | | Reunion East, FL Community Devel. District | | | 6.600 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 3,556,652 | |
1,425,000 | | Reunion East, FL Community Devel. District4,6 | | | 7.375 | | | | 05/01/2033 | | | | 14 | |
140,000 | | Ridgewood Trails, FL Community Devel. District | | | 5.650 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 137,536 | |
7,580,000 | | River Glen, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment5,6 | | | 5.450 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 4,548,000 | |
148,471 | | Santa Rosa Bay, FL Bridge Authority | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 141,148 | |
1,895,000 | | Sarasota County, FL Educational Facilities (School of Arts & Sciences)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 1,951,395 | |
3,790,000 | | Seminole County, FL IDA (Progressive Health)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 03/01/2035 | | | | 3,793,222 | |
3,240,000 | | South Bay, FL Community Devel. District4,6 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 05/01/2025 | | | | 1,631,534 | |
8,750,000 | | South Bay, FL Community Devel. District4,6 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 4,410,613 | |
7,035,000 | | South Bay, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 05/01/2020 | | | | 7,061,803 | |
5,110,000 | | South Bay, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.950 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 51 | |
|
27 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Florida (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$7,000,000 | | South Bay, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.950 | % | | | 05/01/2036 | | | $ | 6,938,750 | |
3,570,000 | | South Fork East, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 6.500 | 3 | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 3,702,626 | |
14,000,000 | | South Miami, FL Health Facilities Authority (BHSF/BHM/HHI/SMH/MarH/DrsH/WKBP/ BOS/FHlth/BHlth/BethH Obligated Group)8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2036 | | | | 14,371,070 | |
3,500,000 | | St. Johns County, FL IDA (Presbyterian Retirement)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 3,783,605 | |
3,500,000 | | St. Johns County, FL IDA (Presbyterian Retirement)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/01/2045 | | | | 3,792,145 | |
1,000,000 | | St. Johns County, FL IDA (St. John’s County Welfare Federation) | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/01/2041 | | | | 844,990 | |
16,765,000 | | Tern Bay, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2015 | | | | 5,448,625 | |
19,075,000 | | Tern Bay, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 6,199,375 | |
10,305,000 | | Town Center, FL at Palm Coast Community Devel. District1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 10,319,427 | |
4,950,000 | | Treeline, FL Preservation Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 6.800 | | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 1,732,500 | |
535,000 | | Villages of Glen Creek FL Community Devel. District Community Devel. District | | | 4.750 | | | | 05/01/2026 | | | | 517,120 | |
1,080,000 | | Villages of Glen Creek FL Community Devel. District Community Devel. District | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 1,006,679 | |
1,815,000 | | Villages of Glen Creek FL Community Devel. District Community Devel. District | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2046 | | | | 1,669,292 | |
2,805,000 | | Villages of Glen Creek FL Community Devel. District Community Devel. District2 | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/01/2046 | | | | 2,579,815 | |
3,630,098 | | Waterford Estates, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment5,6 | | | 5.125 | | | | 05/01/2013 | | | | 3,448,593 | |
2,837,715 | | Waterford Estates, FL Community Devel. District Special Assessment5,6 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 2,695,829 | |
126,000 | | Waters Edge, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 5.350 | | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 123,666 | |
3,355,000 | | Waters Edge, FL Community Devel. District1 | | | 6.600 | 3 | | | 05/01/2039 | | | | 3,361,140 | |
14,800,000 | | Waterstone, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2018 | | | | 11,840,000 | |
1,215,000 | | West Villages, FL Improvement District5,6 | | | 5.350 | | | | 05/01/2015 | | | | 935,550 | |
18,150,000 | | West Villages, FL Improvement District5,6 | | | 5.800 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 13,975,500 | |
14,925,000 | | Westridge, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.800 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 9,552,000 | |
11,045,000 | | Westside, FL Community Devel. District4,6 | | | 5.650 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 6,295,650 | |
16,135,000 | | Westside, FL Community Devel. District4,6 | | | 7.200 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 9,681,000 | |
7,420,000 | | Wyld Palms, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.400 | | | | 05/01/2015 | | | | 1,706,600 | |
4,340,000 | | Wyld Palms, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/01/2038 | | | | 1,041,600 | |
3,786,132 | | Zephyr Ridge, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/01/2013 | | | | 3,180,351 | |
2,634,476 | | Zephyr Ridge, FL Community Devel. District5,6 | | | 5.625 | | | | 05/01/2037 | | | | 2,212,959 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 477,783,721 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Georgia—1.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
700,000 | | Atlanta, GA Tax Allocation (Beltline)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 01/01/2031 | | | | 717,815 | |
3,500,000 | | Atlanta, GA Tax Allocation (Beltline)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 01/01/2031 | | | | 3,589,075 | |
1,445,000 | | Cobb County, GA Devel. Authority (Provident Group-Creekside Properties) | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 1,345,989 | |
|
28 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Georgia (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$5,440,000 | | Cobb County, GA Devel. Authority (Provident Group-Creekside Properties) | | | 6.000 | % | | | 07/01/2051 | | | $ | 4,851,011 | |
31,945,000 | | Fulton County, GA Devel. Authority (Piedmont Healthcare)8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2029 | | | | 32,900,563 | |
13,730,000 | | Fulton County, GA Devel. Authority (Piedmont Healthcare/Piedmont Hospital/Piedmont Hospital Foundation Obligated Group)8 | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 14,169,466 | |
1,525,000 | | GA Environmental Loan Acquisition Corp. (Local Water Authority)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 03/15/2031 | | | | 1,555,058 | |
9,100,000 | | GA Road & Tollway Authority (I-75 S Express Lanes)1 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 06/01/2049 | | | | 6,207,292 | |
2,250,000 | | GA Road & Tollway Authority (I-75 S Express Lanes) | | | 6.246 | 7 | | | 06/01/2024 | | | | 1,614,375 | |
3,750,000 | | GA Road & Tollway Authority (I-75 S Express Lanes) | | | 6.748 | 7 | | | 06/01/2034 | | | | 1,343,062 | |
1,720,000 | | Gainesville & Hall County, GA Devel. Authority Educational Facilities (Riverside Military Academy)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2047 | | | | 1,801,803 | |
1,720,000 | | Gainesville & Hall County, GA Devel. Authority Educational Facilities (Riverside Military Academy)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 03/01/2052 | | | | 1,810,713 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 71,906,222 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hawaii—0.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
580,000 | | HI Dept. of Transportation (Continental Airlines)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 11/15/2027 | | | | 581,288 | |
1,430,000 | | Kuakini, HI Health System (KMC/KHS/KGC/KSS Obligated Group)1 | | | 6.300 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 1,433,904 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,015,192 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Idaho—0.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
960,000 | | ID Health Facilities Authority (Valley Vista Care Corp./Vista Community Hsg. Corp. Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2047 | | | | 990,538 | |
109,200 | | Nampa, ID Local Improvement District No. 148 | | | 6.625 | | | | 09/01/2030 | | | | 111,470 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,102,008 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Illinois—6.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3,000,000 | | Carol Stream, IL Park District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 3,328,740 | |
30,685,000 | | Caseyville, IL Tax (Forest Lakes)4,6 | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/30/2022 | | | | 306,850 | |
1,850,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2023 | | | | 2,031,892 | |
3,500,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2024 | | | | 3,877,335 | |
2,500,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2025 | | | | 2,790,125 | |
1,725,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2026 | | | | 1,935,657 | |
2,100,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2027 | | | | 2,366,616 | |
2,000,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 2,254,400 | |
1,250,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 1,394,088 | |
1,000,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2035 | | | | 1,103,490 | |
5,700,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 04/01/2046 | | | | 6,670,767 | |
1,500,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 1,717,605 | |
|
29 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Illinois (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$7,000,000 | | Chicago, IL Board of Education1 | | | 7.000 | % | | | 12/01/2044 | | | $ | 8,148,350 | |
18,790,000 | | Chicago, IL GO1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2033 | | | | 18,817,058 | |
6,870,000 | | Chicago, IL Metropolitan Water Reclamation1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2044 | | | | 7,556,725 | |
3,000,000 | | Chicago, IL Midway Airport, Series A1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2033 | | | | 3,264,840 | |
30,000 | | Chicago, IL Multifamily Hsg. (Cottage View Terrace)1,2 | | | 6.125 | | | | 02/20/2042 | | | | 30,131 | |
2,500,000 | | Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2047 | | | | 2,721,750 | |
3,750,000 | | Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 4,102,500 | |
5,000,000 | | Chicago, IL O’Hare International Airport1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2052 | | | | 5,424,700 | |
2,755,000 | | Chicago, IL Waterworks1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2030 | | | | 3,199,078 | |
2,900,000 | | Chicago, IL Waterworks1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 3,357,388 | |
2,135,000 | | Chicago, IL Waterworks1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2032 | | | | 2,464,366 | |
2,000,000 | | Chicago, IL Waterworks1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2033 | | | | 2,299,940 | |
2,885,000 | | Chicago, IL Waterworks1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/01/2035 | | | | 3,297,901 | |
10,032,000 | | Cortland, IL Special Tax (Sheaffer System)4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 03/01/2017 | | | | 2,006,400 | |
1,000,000 | | Du Page County, IL Special Service Area No. 31 Special Tax (Monarch Landing)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 03/01/2036 | | | | 1,000,340 | |
1,585,000 | | Franklin Park, IL GO1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 1,763,756 | |
2,103,214 | | Gilberts, IL Special Service Area No. 24 Special Tax (Conservancy) | | | 5.375 | | | | 03/01/2034 | | | | 1,905,954 | |
6,165,000 | | Harvey, IL GO4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2027 | | | | 3,390,750 | |
1,800,000 | | Harvey, IL GO4 | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 990,000 | |
9,900,000 | | IL Educational Facilities Authority (Plum Creek Rolling Meadows)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 9,906,336 | |
1,000,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Admiral at the Lake) | | | 5.125 | | | | 05/15/2038 | | | | 1,001,670 | |
3,220,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Admiral at the Lake) | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/15/2042 | | | | 3,246,790 | |
2,825,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Admiral at the Lake) | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/15/2054 | | | | 2,824,774 | |
5,820,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)8 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 5,964,889 | |
5,180,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)8 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 5,308,956 | |
19,410,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)8 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 19,895,480 | |
21,765,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)8 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 22,309,384 | |
10,575,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)8 | | | 5.500 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 10,847,148 | |
9,425,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Advocate Health Care)8 | | | 5.500 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 9,667,552 | |
320,000 | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 328,198 | |
365,000 | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 04/01/2044 | | | | 374,351 | |
100,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Art Institute of Chicago)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 03/01/2040 | | | | 105,254 | |
12,500,000 | | IL Finance Authority (CDHS)8 | | | 5.500 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 13,082,969 | |
5,000,000 | | IL Finance Authority (CDHS/CDHA)8 | | | 5.375 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 5,225,500 | |
5,460,000 | | IL Finance Authority (DeKalb Supportive Living)1 | | | 6.100 | | | | 12/01/2041 | | | | 5,326,885 | |
2,000,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Friendship Village Schaumburg) | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2027 | | | | 2,047,400 | |
1,000,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Lake Forest College)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2048 | | | | 1,069,070 | |
715,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Luther Oaks)2 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2026 | | | | 716,022 | |
1,500,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Luther Oaks) | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2039 | | | | 1,500,660 | |
100,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Memorial Health System/ Memorial Medical Center-Woodstock Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 04/01/2039 | | | | 102,395 | |
|
30 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Illinois (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$6,500,000 | | IL Finance Authority (NWMH/MJRH&C/NWMHlth/ LFH&FI/NWLFH/DCH/NWMFF/CDHDHS/KS/ VWCH/KCHosp/CDHA/NWMF/RMClinic/CDPG/ KPG Obligated Group)1 | | | 4.000 | % | | | 07/15/2047 | | | $ | 6,617,845 | |
11,050,000 | | IL Finance Authority (PHN/PCTC/PC&SHN/PLC/ PCHN/PSSC/PHCr/PBH/PAS/PHFBT Obligated Group)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 08/15/2034 | | | | 11,747,808 | |
105,000 | | IL Finance Authority (PHN/PCTC/PC&SHN/PLC/ PCHN/PSSC/PHCr/PBH/PAS/PHFBT Obligated Group)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 08/15/2034 | | | | 111,631 | |
575,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Rogers Park Montessori School)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 02/01/2034 | | | | 604,032 | |
1,310,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Rogers Park Montessori School)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 02/01/2045 | | | | 1,373,024 | |
575,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & Science)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 624,427 | |
700,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & Science)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2047 | | | | 756,854 | |
11,860,000 | | IL Finance Authority (St. Anthony Lassing)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 12,218,409 | |
1,500,000 | | IL Finance Authority (The New Admiral at the Lake)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 05/15/2040 | | | | 1,660,710 | |
5,775,000 | | IL Finance Authority (The New Admiral at the Lake)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 05/15/2046 | | | | 6,393,734 | |
4,065,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Villa St. Benedict)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 11/15/2035 | | | | 4,447,395 | |
4,400,000 | | IL Finance Authority (Villa St. Benedict)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | 11/15/2043 | | | | 4,844,180 | |
1,640,000 | | IL Hsg. Devel. Authority (Stonebridge Gurnee) | | | 5.450 | | | | 01/01/2046 | | | | 1,511,047 | |
1,775,000 | | IL Hsg. Devel. Authority (Stonebridge Gurnee) | | | 5.600 | | | | 01/01/2056 | | | | 1,642,319 | |
31,755,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.418 | 7 | | | 06/15/2047 | | | | 8,812,330 | |
6,450,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.509 | 7 | | | 06/15/2043 | | | | 2,158,751 | |
15,000,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.539 | 7 | | | 06/15/2046 | | | | 4,363,500 | |
22,000,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.549 | 7 | | | 12/15/2056 | | | | 3,914,460 | |
10,225,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.609 | 7 | | | 06/15/2044 | | | | 3,266,581 | |
5,000,000 | | IL Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority (McCormick Place Exposition) | | | 4.628 | 7 | | | 12/15/2041 | | | | 1,770,250 | |
15,580,000 | | IL Sales Tax1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/15/2028 | | | | 16,285,930 | |
5,000,000 | | IL Sales Tax1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/15/2029 | | | | 5,198,450 | |
10,625,000 | | IL Sales Tax1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/15/2030 | | | | 10,994,750 | |
7,010,000 | | IL Sales Tax1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/15/2031 | | | | 7,229,553 | |
5,820,000 | | IL Sales Tax1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 06/15/2032 | | | | 5,982,145 | |
11,690,000 | | IL Sales Tax Securitization Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 13,115,596 | |
2,830,000 | | IL Sales Tax Securitization Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 3,170,279 | |
4,000,000 | | IL Sales Tax Securitization Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2048 | | | | 4,430,200 | |
1,778,000 | | Manhattan, IL Special Service Area Special Tax (Lakeside Towns Liberty)5,6 | | | 5.750 | | | | 03/01/2022 | | | | 444,500 | |
|
31 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Illinois (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$3,491,000 | | Plano, IL Special Service Area No. 55 | | | 6.000 | % | | | 03/01/2036 | | | $ | 2,234,240 | |
5,400,000 | | Quad Cities, IL Regional EDA (Pheasant Ridge Apartments)2,6 | | | 6.375 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 3,987,306 | |
162 | | Robbins, IL Res Rec (Robbins Res Rec Partners)1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 10/15/2024 | | | | 161 | |
2,440,000 | | Southwestern IL Devel. Authority (Comprehensive Mental Health Center) | | | 6.625 | | | | 06/01/2037 | | | | 1,918,816 | |
1,500,000 | | Southwestern IL Devel. Authority (Eden Retirement Center) | | | 5.850 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 1,338,825 | |
11,020,000 | | Southwestern IL Devel. Authority (Local Government Programming)6 | | | 7.000 | | | | 10/01/2022 | | | | 6,391,600 | |
3,675,000 | | Southwestern IL Devel. Authority (Village of Sauget)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 11/01/2026 | | | | 3,507,824 | |
12,675,000 | | Upper, IL River Valley Devel. Authority (DeerPath Huntley)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 12,673,479 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 404,114,116 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Indiana—1.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2,000,000 | | Allen County, IN Economic Devel. (Storypoint/ SL2016/SLW/SLC/SLFW/SLF Obligated Group) | | | 6.875 | | | | 01/15/2052 | | | | 2,157,220 | |
1,140,000 | | Anderson, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Cross Lakes Apartments)4,6 | | | 9.000 | | | | 12/01/2045 | | | | 11 | |
4,300,000 | | Carmel, IN Redevel. District COP1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/15/2035 | | | | 4,777,257 | |
1,225,000 | | Chesterton, IN Economic Devel. (Storypoint/ SL2016/SLW/SLC Obligated Group) | | | 6.375 | | | | 01/15/2051 | | | | 1,281,485 | |
5,805,000 | | East Chicago, IN Solid Waste Disposal (USG Corp.)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | 08/01/2029 | | | | 5,818,874 | |
3,430,000 | | Evansville, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Evansville)1 | | | 5.450 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 3,425,712 | |
595,000 | | Fort Wayne, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Fort Wayne)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 587,313 | |
3,850,000 | | Fort Wayne, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Fort Wayne)1 | | | 5.350 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 3,799,488 | |
2,050,000 | | IN Finance Authority (Avondale Meadows Academy)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 2,050,615 | |
1,675,000 | | IN Finance Authority (BHI Senior Living)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 11/15/2031 | | | | 1,800,139 | |
2,850,000 | | IN Finance Authority (BHI Senior Living)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/15/2041 | | | | 3,075,748 | |
11,505,000 | | IN Finance Authority (Marian University)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | 09/15/2041 | | | | 12,371,672 | |
925,000 | | IN Finance Authority Educational Facilities (Irvington Community)1 | | | 9.000 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 946,756 | |
3,950,000 | | IN Hsg. & Community Devel. Authority (Evergreen Village Bloomington)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 3,959,322 | |
6,225,000 | | IN Hsg. & Community Devel. Authority (Hammond Assisted Living Community)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 01/01/2036 | | | | 5,986,458 | |
1,095,000 | | Kokomo, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch of Kokomo)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 01/01/2034 | | | | 1,123,328 | |
4,570,000 | | Kokomo, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch of Kokomo)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 4,708,700 | |
1,060,000 | | Lafayette, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Glasswater Creek of Lafayette)1 | | | 5.600 | | | | 01/01/2033 | | | | 1,080,045 | |
|
32 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Indiana (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$5,160,000 | | Lafayette, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Glasswater Creek of Lafayette)1 | | | 5.800 | % | | | 01/01/2037 | | | $ | 5,282,240 | |
4,965,000 | | Merrillville, IN Economic Devel. (Belvedere Hsg.)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 04/01/2036 | | | | 4,726,730 | |
14,565,000 | | Michigan City, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Project)1 | | | 5.150 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 14,076,781 | |
4,975,000 | | Mishawaka, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Mishawaka)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 4,924,504 | |
2,560,000 | | Muncie, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch Project)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 2,503,731 | |
4,205,000 | | Shelbyville, IN Redevel. District Tax Increment (Central Shelbyville Economic)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 4,214,587 | |
3,880,000 | | Terre Haute, IN Multifamily Hsg. (Silver Birch of Terre Haute)1 | | | 5.350 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 3,829,094 | |
3,425,000 | | Vincennes, IN Economic Devel. (Southwest Indiana Regional Youth Village) | | | 6.250 | | | | 01/01/2029 | | | | 3,515,763 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 102,023,573 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Iowa—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,160,000 | | IA Finance Authority (Boys & Girls Home and Family Services)4,6 | | | 5.900 | | | | 12/01/2028 | | | | 78,300 | |
730,000 | | IA Finance Authority Senior Hsg. (Wedum Walnut Ridge)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 06/01/2025 | | | | 730,066 | |
2,845,000 | | IA Tobacco Settlement Authority (TASC)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 06/01/2023 | | | | 2,898,201 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 3,706,567 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kansas—0.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3,176,456 | | Olathe, KS Tax Increment (Gateway)4,6 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2026 | | | | 1,905,874 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Kentucky—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,775,000 | | Kuttawa, KY (1st Mtg.-GF/Kentucky) | | | 6.750 | | | | 03/01/2029 | | | | 1,775,089 | |
1,250,000 | | KY EDFA (Masonic Home Independent Living II)1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 05/15/2041 | | | | 1,430,950 | |
1,000,000 | | KY EDFA (Masonic Home Independent Living II)1 | | | 7.375 | | | | 05/15/2046 | | | | 1,148,140 | |
6,785,000 | | KY Municipal Power Agency1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2034 | | | | 7,475,713 | |
5,000,000 | | KY Municipal Power Agency1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2036 | | | | 5,483,200 | |
1,900,000 | | KY Property & Building Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2031 | | | | 2,175,785 | |
1,900,000 | | KY Property & Building Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2032 | | | | 2,167,254 | |
900,000 | | KY Property & Building Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2033 | | | | 1,022,580 | |
900,000 | | KY Property & Building Commission1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2034 | | | | 1,019,376 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 23,698,087 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Louisiana—0.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,200,000 | | Juban Park, LA Community Devel. District Special Assessment5,6 | | | 5.150 | | | | 10/01/2014 | | | | 336,000 | |
11,415,000 | | LA HFA (La Chateau)1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 09/01/2039 | | | | 11,125,858 | |
1,220,000 | | LA Local Government EF&CD Authority (Better Waterworks)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/01/2043 | | | | 1,172,542 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 12,634,400 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maine—0.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2,000,000 | | ME Finance Authority (Casella Waste Systems)1 | | | 4.375 | 10 | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 2,017,400 | |
|
33 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Maine (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$6,850,000 | | ME H&HEFA (Bowdoin College)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 07/01/2039 | | | $ | 7,042,622 | |
2,000,000 | | ME H&HEFA (Maine General Medical Center)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 2,156,060 | |
4,800,000 | | Rumford, ME Pollution Control (Boise Cascade Corp.) | | | 6.625 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 4,799,760 | |
12,265,000 | | Rumford, ME Solid Waste Disposal (Boise Cascade Corp.) | | | 6.875 | | | | 10/01/2026 | | | | 12,264,141 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 28,279,983 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maryland—0.7% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
9,525,000 | | Baltimore County, MD GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2040 | | | | 10,020,586 | |
1,100,000 | | Baltimore, MD Special Obligation (Center/West Devel.)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 1,121,384 | |
1,360,000 | | Baltimore, MD Special Obligation (Center/West Devel.)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/01/2043 | | | | 1,389,376 | |
25,950,000 | | MD Stadium Authority (Construction & Revitalization Program)8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2047 | | | | 29,667,018 | |
6,856,636 | | Salisbury, MD Special Obligation (Villages at Salisbury Lake)4,6 | | | 3.787 | 7 | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 788,513 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 42,986,877 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Massachusetts—1.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6,905,000 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (Lasell College)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 7,472,660 | |
1,600,702 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (Linden Ponds) | | | 1.009 | 7 | | | 11/15/2056 | | | | 329,665 | |
195,000 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (Linden Ponds)1 | | | 4.680 | | | | 11/15/2021 | | | | 196,137 | |
3,235,000 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (Linden Ponds)1,2 | | | 4.680 | | | | 11/15/2021 | | | | 3,253,860 | |
312,377 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (Linden Ponds)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 11/15/2046 | | | | 312,452 | |
444,906 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (Linden Ponds)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 11/15/2018 | | | | 446,890 | |
2,057,748 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (Linden Ponds)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 11/15/2039 | | | | 2,128,843 | |
6,062,305 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (Linden Ponds)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 11/15/2046 | | | | 6,270,909 | |
1,000,000 | | MA Devel. Finance Agency (VOA Concord)1 | | | 5.200 | | | | 11/01/2041 | | | | 1,000,060 | |
13,000,000 | | MA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2040 | | | | 14,980,030 | |
9,820,000 | | MA H&EFA (Milford Regional Medical Center)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2032 | | | | 9,909,166 | |
7,080,000 | | MA HFA, Series C8 | | | 5.350 | | | | 12/01/2042 | | | | 7,158,694 | |
660,000 | | MA Port Authority (Delta Air Lines)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2027 | | | | 667,253 | |
2,240,000 | | Saugus, MA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2039 | | | | 2,339,725 | |
2,500,000 | | Saugus, MA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2040 | | | | 2,609,225 | |
2,670,000 | | Saugus, MA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2041 | | | | 2,784,436 | |
2,750,000 | | Saugus, MA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2042 | | | | 2,865,582 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 64,725,587 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Michigan—2.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,600,000 | | American Montessori Academy, MI Public School Academy | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 1,591,968 | |
3,465,000 | | Arts & Technology Academy Pontiac, MI Public School Academy | | | 6.000 | | | | 11/01/2046 | | | | 3,241,819 | |
2,740,000 | | Charyl Stockwell Academy, MI Public School Academy1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 10/01/2035 | | | | 2,715,751 | |
4,140,000 | | Charyl Stockwell Academy, MI Public School Academy1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 10/01/2045 | | | | 4,139,627 | |
|
34 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Michigan (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$10,100,000 | | Detroit, MI City School District8 | | | 6.000 | % | | | 05/01/2029 | | | $ | 11,955,421 | |
803,643 | | Detroit, MI GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2020 | | | | 800,284 | |
906,750 | | Detroit, MI GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2021 | | | | 889,005 | |
350,300 | | Detroit, MI GO1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 04/01/2020 | | | | 348,570 | |
155,000 | | Detroit, MI GO | | | 5.250 | | | | 04/01/2020 | | | | 154,234 | |
342,550 | | Detroit, MI GO | | | 5.250 | | | | 04/01/2021 | | | | 338,511 | |
206,150 | | Detroit, MI GO1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 04/01/2022 | | | | 201,444 | |
15,500 | | Detroit, MI GO | | | 5.250 | | | | 04/01/2023 | | | | 14,971 | |
1,165,000 | | Detroit, MI Local Devel. Finance Authority1 | | | 6.700 | | | | 05/01/2021 | | | | 1,175,951 | |
565,000 | | Detroit, MI Local Devel. Finance Authority1 | | | 6.850 | | | | 05/01/2021 | | | | 570,311 | |
8,000,000 | | Great Lakes, MI Water Authority Supply System1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 9,314,560 | |
200,000 | | MI Finance Authority (HFHS/HFMHCT/HFWH/ WAFMH Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2041 | | | | 220,650 | |
1,215,000 | | MI Hospital Finance Authority (McLaren Health Care Corp.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2034 | | | | 1,352,101 | |
685,000 | | MI Public Educational Facilities Authority (American Montessori) | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 684,959 | |
1,400,000 | | MI Public Educational Facilities Authority (Old Redford Academy)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2035 | | | | 1,387,960 | |
1,071,375 | | MI Strategic Fund Limited Obligation (Wolverine Human Services)1 | | | 7.875 | | | | 08/31/2028 | | | | 1,073,325 | |
3,000,000 | | MI Strategic Fund Solid Waste (Genesee Power Station)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 01/01/2021 | | | | 2,962,860 | |
2,725,780,000 | | MI Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority | | | 7.965 | 7 | | | 06/01/2058 | | | | 85,289,656 | |
1,400,000 | | Old Redford Academy, MI Public School Academy1 | | | 5.900 | | | | 12/01/2030 | | | | 1,398,656 | |
3,500,000 | | Summit Academy North, MI Public School Academy1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2031 | | | | 3,516,170 | |
2,800,000 | | Summit Academy North, MI Public School Academy1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2035 | | | | 2,736,524 | |
13,635,000 | | Wayne, MI Charter County Airport Facilities (Northwest Airlines)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 13,664,997 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 151,740,285 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minnesota—0.7% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,000,000 | | Bethel, MN Senior Hsg. (Lodge at Lakes at Stillwater)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2048 | | | | 1,013,790 | |
600,000 | | Bethel, MN Senior Hsg. (Lodge at Lakes at Stillwater)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2053 | | | | 604,794 | |
1,625,000 | | Bethel, MN Senior Hsg. (Lodge at Lakes at Stillwater)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2058 | | | | 1,651,910 | |
6,915,000 | | Brooklyn Center, MN Multifamily Hsg. (Sanctuary Brooklyn Center)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 11/01/2035 | | | | 6,936,506 | |
3,115,000 | | Brooklyn Center, MN Multifamily Hsg. (Sanctuary Brooklyn Center)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 11/01/2035 | | | | 2,891,468 | |
6,370,000 | | International Falls, MN Solid Waste Disposal (Boise Cascade Corp.) | | | 6.850 | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 6,369,554 | |
1,075,000 | | Minneapolis, MN Charter School (Spero Academy) | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,065,518 | |
|
35 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Minnesota (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$4,740,000 | | Minneapolis, MN Charter School (Spero Academy) | | | 6.500 | % | | | 07/01/2048 | | | $ | 4,678,143 | |
715,000 | | Minneapolis, MN Multifamily Hsg. (Blaisdell Apartments)1 | | | 5.400 | | | | 04/01/2028 | | | | 714,993 | |
5,340,000 | | Minneapolis, MN Multifamily Hsg. (Blaisdell Apartments)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 04/01/2042 | | | | 5,327,558 | |
500,000 | | Minneapolis, MN Student Hsg. (Riverton Community Hsg.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2053 | | | | 507,905 | |
515,000 | | Red Wing, MN Senior Hsg. (Benedictine Living Community of Northfield) | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2053 | | | | 515,335 | |
1,475,000 | | St. Paul, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority (Bridgecreek Senior Place)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 09/15/2037 | | | | 1,475,501 | |
1,524,036 | | St. Paul, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority (Episcopal Nursing Home)1 | | | 5.630 | | | | 10/01/2033 | | | | 1,524,782 | |
2,259,000 | | St. Paul, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority (Great Northern Lofts)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 03/01/2029 | | | | 2,184,317 | |
1,075,000 | | St. Paul, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority (Great River School) | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2052 | | | | 1,105,444 | |
2,305,000 | | St. Paul, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority Charter School (Hmong College Prep Academy)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/01/2043 | | | | 2,359,675 | |
200,000 | | Wadena, MN Hsg. & Redevel. Authority (Humphrey Manor East)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 02/01/2019 | | | | 199,142 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 41,126,335 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mississippi—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,875,000 | | Meridian, MS Tax Increment (Meridian Crossroads)1 | | | 8.750 | | | | 12/01/2024 | | | | 1,952,344 | |
13,015,000 | | Mississippi State University Educational Building1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 13,462,716 | |
3,630,000 | | MS Business Finance Corp. (Cooperative Energy Mississippi Electric)1 | | | 4.700 | | | | 05/01/2024 | | | | 3,702,781 | |
1,395,000 | | Ridgeland, MS Tax Increment (Colony Park)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/01/2027 | | | | 1,432,526 | |
1,755,000 | | Ridgeland, MS Tax Increment (Colony Park)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 10/01/2028 | | | | 1,804,087 | |
16,410,000 | | Stonebridge, MS Public Improvement District Special Assessment5 | | | 7.500 | | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 1,312,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 23,667,254 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Missouri—0.8% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
4,900,000 | | Branson, MO Commerce Park Community Improvement District4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 06/01/2026 | | | | 1,078,000 | |
2,390,000 | | Branson, MO IDA (Branson Hills Redevel.) | | | 5.750 | | | | 05/01/2026 | | | | 2,375,038 | |
12,600,000 | | Branson, MO IDA (Branson Hills Redevel.) | | | 7.050 | | | | 05/01/2027 | | | | 12,609,324 | |
495,000 | | Branson, MO IDA (Branson Landing) | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2021 | | | | 482,140 | |
2,970,000 | | Branson, MO IDA (Branson Landing) | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/01/2029 | | | | 2,887,018 | |
570,000 | | Broadway-Fairview, MO Transportation Devel. District (Columbia)4,6 | | | 6.125 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 370,500 | |
785,000 | | Chillicothe, MO Tax Increment (South U.S. 65) | | | 5.500 | | | | 04/01/2021 | | | | 673,342 | |
3,100,000 | | Chillicothe, MO Tax Increment (South U.S. 65) | | | 5.625 | | | | 04/01/2027 | | | | 2,299,518 | |
880,000 | | Jennings, MO Tax Increment & Community Improvement (Northland Redevel. Area) | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2023 | | | | 782,936 | |
|
36 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Missouri (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,000,000 | | Kansas City, MO IDA (Sales Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 04/01/2036 | | | $ | 1,033,360 | |
740,000 | | Kansas City, MO IDA (Sales Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2046 | | | | 753,150 | |
1,129,000 | | Kansas City, MO IDA (West Paseo)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 1,128,898 | |
1,200,000 | | Lees Summit, MO IDA (Kensington Farms)4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 03/01/2021 | | | | 768,000 | |
750,000 | | Lees Summit, MO IDA (Kensington Farms)4 | | | 5.750 | | | | 03/01/2029 | | | | 480,000 | |
2,800,000 | | Lees Summit, MO Tax (Summit Fair Community Improvement District)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 2,809,800 | |
3,020,000 | | MO Dardenne Town Square Transportation Devel. District4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2026 | | | | 906,000 | |
3,825,000 | | MO Dardenne Town Square Transportation Devel. District4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2036 | | | | 1,147,500 | |
205,000 | | MO Grindstone Plaza Transportation Devel. District | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/01/2021 | | | | 202,524 | |
400,000 | | MO Grindstone Plaza Transportation Devel. District | | | 5.400 | | | | 10/01/2026 | | | | 382,416 | |
115,000 | | MO Grindstone Plaza Transportation Devel. District | | | 5.550 | | | | 10/01/2036 | | | | 103,215 | |
2,000,000 | | Move Rolla, MO Transportation Devel. District1 | | | 4.625 | | | | 06/01/2042 | | | | 2,050,740 | |
700,000 | | Northwoods, MO Transportation Devel. District | | | 5.850 | | | | 02/01/2031 | | | | 651,847 | |
2,750,000 | | Saint Charles County, MO IDA (Suemandy/Mid- Rivers Community Improvement District)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2046 | | | | 2,629,825 | |
4,580,000 | | St. Louis, MO IDA (Railway Exchange Building Redevel.)5,6 | | | 8.000 | | | | 04/27/2033 | | | | 137,400 | |
2,000,000 | | St. Louis, MO Land Clearance Redevel. Authority (14th & Market Community Improvement District)1 | | | 6.375 | | | | 04/01/2043 | | | | 1,965,580 | |
4,000,000 | | St. Louis, MO Land Clearance Redevel. Authority (Scottrade Center)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2038 | | | | 4,407,200 | |
2,442,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (1601 Washington Redevel.)4,6 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/21/2026 | | | | 683,760 | |
2,032,491 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (Pet Building Redevel.) | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/29/2028 | | | | 1,358,273 | |
1,660,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (Printers Lofts)4,6 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/21/2026 | | | | 448,200 | |
3,043,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (Security Building Redevel.)4,6 | | | 6.300 | | | | 04/01/2027 | | | | 1,217,200 | |
1,510,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (Washington East Condominiums)4,6 | | | 5.500 | | | | 01/20/2028 | | | | 362,400 | |
2,321,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment (Washington East Condominiums)6 | | | 5.500 | | | | 01/20/2028 | | | | 1,160,500 | |
1,108,000 | | St. Louis, MO Tax Increment Financing, Series A6 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/02/2028 | | | | 498,600 | |
1,865,000 | | Stone Canyon, MO Improvement District (Infrastructure)5,6 | | | 5.700 | | | | 04/01/2022 | | | | 456,925 | |
|
37 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Missouri (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$975,000 | | Stone Canyon, MO Improvement District (Infrastructure)5,6 | | | 5.750 | % | | | 04/01/2027 | | | $ | 238,875 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 51,540,004 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Montana—0.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5,935,000 | | Hardin, MT Tax Increment Industrial Infrastructure Devel. (Rocky Mountain Power)4,6 | | | 6.250 | 3 | | | 09/01/2031 | | | | 771,550 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nebraska—0.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
20,000,000 | | Douglas County, NE Hospital Authority (Methodist Health System)8 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/01/2048 | | | | 20,142,494 | |
3,000,000 | | NE Central Plains Gas Energy1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2042 | | | | 3,569,880 | |
10,000,000 | | Omaha, NE Public Power District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2042 | | | | 11,528,800 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 35,241,174 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nevada—0.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
27,500,000 | | Clark County, NV GO8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2048 | | | | 31,535,969 | |
975,000 | | Clark County, NV Improvement District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2026 | | | | 983,346 | |
750,000 | | Clark County, NV Improvement District1 | | | 5.050 | | | | 02/01/2031 | | | | 755,535 | |
275,000 | | Director of the State of NV Dept. of Business & Industry (Las Vegas Monorail) | | | 7.329 | 7 | | | 01/01/2019 | | | | 265,375 | |
90,000 | | Mesquite, NV Special Improvement District (Canyon Creek)1,2 | | | 5.400 | | | | 08/01/2020 | | | | 90,768 | |
315,000 | | Mesquite, NV Special Improvement District (Canyon Creek)1,2 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2025 | | | | 316,468 | |
30,000,000 | | Reno, NV Sales Tax | | | 6.143 | 7 | | | 07/01/2058 | | | | 3,349,500 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 37,296,961 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Hampshire—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,365,000 | | NH Business Finance Authority (Huggins Hospital)1 | | | 6.875 | | | | 10/01/2039 | | | | 1,438,751 | |
100,000 | | NH H&EFA (Hillside Village) | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 101,719 | |
1,725,000 | | NH H&EFA (Hillside Village) | | | 6.125 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,845,198 | |
3,875,000 | | NH H&EFA (Hillside Village) | | | 6.125 | | | | 07/01/2052 | | | | 4,113,700 | |
865,000 | | NH H&EFA (Hillside Village) | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 929,088 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,428,456 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Jersey—1.9% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3,583,000 | | Newark, NJ GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2029 | | | | 3,765,231 | |
5,000,000 | | NJ EDA1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2041 | | | | 5,389,300 | |
75,000 | | NJ EDA (Continental Airlines)1 | | | 4.875 | | | | 09/15/2019 | | | | 76,379 | |
3,750,000 | | NJ EDA (Continental Airlines)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 11/15/2030 | | | | 4,247,625 | |
2,055,000 | | NJ EDA (Friends of Teaneck Community Charter School)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 09/01/2052 | | | | 1,979,664 | |
1,865,000 | | NJ EDA (Hatikvah International Academy Charter School) | | | 5.375 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 1,913,378 | |
565,000 | | NJ EDA (Leap Academy Charter School)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2034 | | | | 578,068 | |
750,000 | | NJ EDA (Leap Academy Charter School)1 | | | 6.200 | | | | 10/01/2044 | | | | 762,960 | |
500,000 | | NJ EDA (Leap Academy Charter School)1 | | | 6.300 | | | | 10/01/2049 | | | | 510,675 | |
|
38 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
New Jersey (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,875,000 | | NJ EDA (North Star Academy Charter School of Newark)1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 07/15/2047 | | | $ | 2,013,412 | |
1,000,000 | | NJ EDA (Paterson Charter School Science & Technology)1 | | | 6.100 | | | | 07/01/2044 | | | | 1,007,530 | |
650,000 | | NJ EDA (Provident Group-Kean Properties)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 699,881 | |
5,000,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (College of St. Elizabeth)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 5,042,050 | |
5,515,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Princeton University)8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 5,921,300 | |
7,975,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Princeton University)8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 8,543,056 | |
4,000,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Princeton University)8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 4,275,080 | |
5,000,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Princeton University)8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 5,339,838 | |
40,600,000 | | NJ Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 43,597,904 | |
18,650,000 | | NJ Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 20,931,455 | |
3,300,000 | | NJ Transportation Trust Fund Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2031 | | | | 3,654,552 | |
210,000 | | Weehawken Township, NJ GO1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/01/2021 | | | | 226,279 | |
210,000 | | Weehawken Township, NJ GO1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/01/2022 | | | | 225,553 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 120,701,170 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New Mexico—0.2% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
615,000 | | Boulders, NM Pubic Improvement District1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 10/01/2044 | | | | 615,658 | |
3,500,000 | | Farmington, NM Pollution Control (Public Service Company of New Mexico)1 | | | 2.125 | 10 | | | 06/01/2040 | | | | 3,430,910 | |
355,000 | | Mariposa East, NM Public Improvement District | | | 5.900 | 3 | | | 09/01/2032 | | | | 353,683 | |
560,000 | | Mariposa East, NM Public Improvement District | | | 5.900 | | | | 09/01/2032 | | | | 534,688 | |
75,000 | | Mariposa East, NM Public Improvement District1 | | | 5.900 | | | | 09/01/2032 | | | | 74,995 | |
475,000 | | Mariposa East, NM Public Improvement District | | | 12.874 | 7 | | | 03/01/2032 | | | | 71,250 | |
1,925,000 | | NM Trails Public Improvement District | | | 7.750 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 1,803,321 | |
4,235,000 | | Saltillo, NM Improvement District1 | | | 7.625 | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 4,245,969 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 11,130,474 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York—16.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
14,945,000 | | Brookhaven, NY IDA (BK at Lake Grove)1 | | | 7.750 | 10 | | | 11/01/2046 | | | | 15,928,531 | |
14,910,000 | | Brookhaven, NY IDA (BK at Lake Grove)1 | | | 7.750 | 10 | | | 11/01/2046 | | | | 15,891,227 | |
9,950,000 | | Brookhaven, NY IDA (BK at Lake Grove)1 | | | 7.750 | 10 | | | 11/01/2046 | | | | 10,175,069 | |
17,700,000 | | Erie County, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp. | | | 5.630 | 7 | | | 06/01/2055 | | | | 970,845 | |
4,245,000 | | Essex County, NY IDA (Champlain Valley Milling Corp.) | | | 6.250 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 4,312,665 | |
5,400,000 | | Guilderland, NY IDA (Promenade Albany Senior Living) | | | 5.875 | | | | 01/01/2052 | | | | 5,356,692 | |
13,500,000 | | Hudson Yards, NY Infrastructure Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2037 | | | | 15,421,590 | |
7,500,000 | | Hudson Yards, NY Infrastructure Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2039 | | | | 8,537,400 | |
1,470,000 | | Islip, NY IDA (Engel Burman at Sayville)1 | | | 7.750 | 10 | | | 11/01/2045 | | | | 1,566,741 | |
1,000,000 | | Monroe County, NY Industrial Devel. Corp. (St. John Fisher College)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2030 | | | | 1,101,950 | |
|
39 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
New York (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$2,937,408 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside)5 | | | 2.000 | % | | | 01/01/2049 | | | $ | 499,359 | |
911,543 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 924,368 | |
187,500 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 01/01/2023 | | | | 194,593 | |
922,500 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 979,132 | |
1,780,000 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside)1 | | | 6.700 | | | | 01/01/2049 | | | | 1,889,612 | |
6,100,000 | | Nassau County, NY IDA (Amsterdam at Harborside)1 | | | 6.700 | | | | 01/01/2049 | | | | 6,479,237 | |
10,000,000 | | New York St Dorm Auth St Personal Income Tax Revenue8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2037 | | | | 11,372,753 | |
234,000,000 | | NY Counties Tobacco Trust V | | | 6.732 | 7 | | | 06/01/2060 | | | | 7,857,720 | |
37,380,000 | | NY Liberty Devel. Corp. (Bank of America Tower)8 | | | 5.125 | | | | 01/15/2044 | | | | 38,979,918 | |
5,005,000 | | NY MTA1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2056 | | | | 5,618,913 | |
3,000,000 | | NY MTA (Green Bond)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/15/2038 | | | | 3,098,100 | |
9,300,000 | | NY MTA (Green Bond)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2035 | | | | 10,772,841 | |
10,000,000 | | NY MTA (Green Bond)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2057 | | | | 11,582,900 | |
10,000,000 | | NY MTA Hudson Rail Yards1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2046 | | | | 10,337,300 | |
33,190,000 | | NY MTA Hudson Rail Yards1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2056 | | | | 35,904,942 | |
485,000 | | NY MTA, Series D1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2027 | | | | 565,534 | |
560,000 | | NY MTA, Series D1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2028 | | | | 652,988 | |
900,000 | | NY MTA, Series D1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2029 | | | | 1,049,445 | |
900,000 | | NY MTA, Series D1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2030 | | | | 1,049,445 | |
900,000 | | NY MTA, Series D1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2031 | | | | 1,049,445 | |
900,000 | | NY MTA, Series D1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2032 | | | | 1,049,445 | |
900,000 | | NY MTA, Series D1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 11/15/2033 | | | | 1,049,445 | |
12,250,000 | | NY Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2042 | | | | 14,027,598 | |
6,895,000 | | NYC GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2035 | | | | 8,019,023 | |
11,975,000 | | NYC GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2039 | | | | 13,807,894 | |
11,355,000 | | NYC GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2041 | | | | 13,060,067 | |
9,050,000 | | NYC GO1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 10,847,059 | |
7,450,000 | | NYC IDA (Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners)1 | | | 5.650 | | | | 10/01/2028 | | | | 7,527,033 | |
18,665,000 | | NYC IDA (Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 10/01/2036 | | | | 18,857,996 | |
8,670,000 | | NYC IDA (Brooklyn Navy Yard Cogeneration Partners)1 | | | 6.200 | | | | 10/01/2022 | | | | 8,863,254 | |
27,945,000 | | NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2038 | | | | 32,159,106 | |
10,000,000 | | NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2038 | | | | 11,438,200 | |
20,740,000 | | NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2040 | | | | 23,831,297 | |
15,000,000 | | NYC Municipal Water Finance Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2048 | | | | 17,144,250 | |
5,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/15/2037 | | | | 5,217,050 | |
7,700,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/15/2035 | | | | 9,203,040 | |
20,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/15/2036 | | | | 23,828,000 | |
7,700,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Building Aid)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/15/2036 | | | | 9,173,780 | |
15,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 15,582,638 | |
|
40 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
New York (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$5,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 4.000 | % | | | 08/01/2042 | | | $ | 5,172,000 | |
1,360,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2032 | | | | 1,574,839 | |
7,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2035 | | | | 8,020,600 | |
10,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2037 | | | | 11,298,100 | |
17,500,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2037 | | | | 20,078,450 | |
2,450,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2039 | | | | 2,783,641 | |
10,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2039 | | | | 11,431,200 | |
19,970,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2040 | | | | 22,549,725 | |
29,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1,2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 33,427,430 | |
9,545,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 10,903,063 | |
75,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 85,287,000 | |
6,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 6,822,960 | |
20,085,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2043 | | | | 22,756,104 | |
7,640,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2045 | | | | 8,694,931 | |
5,000,000 | | NYS DA (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 5,697,200 | |
25,000,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2037 | | | | 28,969,000 | |
13,270,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2039 | | | | 15,328,973 | |
15,000,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2040 | | | | 17,313,900 | |
31,720,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax) | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2041 | | | | 36,584,579 | |
14,000,000 | | NYS DA (Sales Tax)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2043 | | | | 15,963,920 | |
17,900,000 | | NYS DA (St. Mary’s Hospital for Children) | | | 7.875 | | | | 11/15/2041 | | | | 18,733,961 | |
10,000,000 | | NYS DA (State Personal Income Tax Authority)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2032 | | | | 11,542,100 | |
6,500,000 | | NYS DA (State Personal Income Tax Authority)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2043 | | | | 7,342,855 | |
6,705,000 | | NYS DA (State University of New York)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 7,536,554 | |
21,750,000 | | NYS Liberty Devel. Corp. (4 World Trade Center)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/15/2051 | | | | 24,227,978 | |
2,500,000 | | NYS Transitional Devel. Corp. (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevel.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2034 | | | | 2,716,775 | |
5,000,000 | | NYS Transitional Devel. Corp. (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevel.)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 5,369,750 | |
7,000,000 | | NYS Transitional Devel. Corp. (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B Redevel.)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2050 | | | | 7,590,660 | |
13,000,000 | | NYS Transportation Devel. Corp. (American Airlines/JFK International Airport)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2026 | | | | 13,713,180 | |
2,525,000 | | NYS Transportation Devel. Corp. (LaGuardia Airport Terminal B)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 2,587,772 | |
200,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (JFK International Air Terminal)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2025 | | | | 208,762 | |
1,210,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ (KIAC)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 10/01/2019 | | | | 1,265,829 | |
11,050,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 200th Series8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/15/2057 | | | | 12,460,443 | |
13,000,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 205th Series8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/15/2057 | | | | 14,754,610 | |
2,000,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 206th Series1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2042 | | | | 2,249,500 | |
9,725,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 206th Series1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2047 | | | | 10,897,057 | |
10,000,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 206th Series8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/15/2047 | | | | 11,205,225 | |
12,915,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 207th Series1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/15/2025 | | | | 14,890,091 | |
8,385,000 | | Suffolk, NY Tobacco Asset Securitization Corp. | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2048 | | | | 8,390,115 | |
|
41 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
New York (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,140,000 | | Yonkers, NY IDA (St. Joseph’s Hospital), Series 98-C | | | 6.200 | % | | | 03/01/2020 | | | $ | 1,140,080 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,024,288,342 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
North Carolina—0.3% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
15,000,000 | | NC Capital Facilities Finance Agency (Duke University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2055 | | | | 16,858,650 | |
1,650,000 | | NC Medical Care Commission (Whitestone)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 03/01/2031 | | | | 1,891,016 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 18,749,666 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ohio—7.7% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
9,950,000 | | Allen County, OH Hospital Facilities (Catholic Healthcare)8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2038 | | | | 10,528,676 | |
9,225,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/01/2024 | | | | 9,213,469 | |
17,325,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 5.375 | | | | 06/01/2024 | | | | 17,325,346 | |
5,000,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 5.750 | | | | 06/01/2034 | | | | 5,012,550 | |
43,385,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 5.875 | | | | 06/01/2030 | | | | 43,601,925 | |
69,490,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 70,088,309 | |
12,937,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2042 | | | | 12,937,129 | |
62,055,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 6.250 | 3 | | | 06/01/2037 | | | | 65,000,130 | |
66,170,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 68,154,438 | |
733,800,000 | | Buckeye, OH Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority (TASC) | | | 6.508 | 7 | | | 06/01/2052 | | | | 33,343,872 | |
5,645,000 | | Butler County, OH Port Authority (Maple Knoll Communities)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2043 | | | | 6,258,047 | |
1,000,000 | | Butler County, OH Port Authority (Storypoint/ SL2016/SLW/SLC/SLFW/SLF Obligated Group) | | | 6.250 | | | | 01/15/2034 | | | | 1,052,890 | |
1,000,000 | | Butler County, OH Port Authority (Storypoint/ SL2016/SLW/SLC/SLFW/SLF Obligated Group) | | | 6.375 | | | | 01/15/2043 | | | | 1,051,590 | |
2,250,000 | | Butler County, OH Port Authority (Storypoint/ SL2016/SLW/SLC/SLFW/SLF Obligated Group) | | | 6.500 | | | | 01/15/2052 | | | | 2,370,870 | |
815,000 | | Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH Port Authority (Playhouse Square Foundation)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 893,240 | |
735,000 | | Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH Port Authority (Playhouse Square Foundation)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2043 | | | | 816,975 | |
2,900,000 | | Cleveland-Cuyahoga County, OH Port Authority (Playhouse Square Foundation)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2053 | | | | 3,197,830 | |
205,000 | | Columbus-Franklin County, OH Finance Authority, Series A1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 05/15/2035 | | | | 207,308 | |
14,550,000 | | Cuyahoga County, OH Hospital (Metro Health System)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 02/15/2052 | | | | 15,883,944 | |
|
42 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Ohio (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$4,900,000 | | Cuyahoga County, OH Hospital (Metro Health System)1 | | | 5.500 | % | | | 02/15/2057 | | | $ | 5,330,906 | |
30,900,000 | | Gallia County, OH Hospital Facilities (Holzer/HHlthS/HMCG/HMCJ Obligated Group) | | | 8.000 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 35,238,978 | |
1,450,000 | | Hancock County, OH Hospital (BVRHC/BVHF Obligated Group)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 1,624,682 | |
105,000 | | Lake County, OH Hospital Facilities (Lake Hospital System)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/15/2038 | | | | 105,165 | |
20,000 | | Lake County, OH Hospital Facilities (Lake Hospital System)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/15/2038 | | | | 20,066 | |
375,000 | | Lorain County, OH Port Authority (Alumalloy LLC)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 11/15/2025 | | | | 375,026 | |
10,000,000 | | Montgomery County, OH (Miami Valley Hospital)8 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/15/2023 | | | | 10,823,100 | |
1,100,000 | | Norwood, OH Special Obligation (Central Parke)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 1,122,550 | |
700,000 | | OH Air Quality Devel. Authority (FirstEnergy Generation)5 | | | 5.625 | | | | 06/01/2018 | | | | 675,500 | |
2,000,000 | | OH Air Quality Devel. Authority (FirstEnergy Generation)5 | | | 3.100 | 10 | | | 03/01/2023 | | | | 1,110,000 | |
7,750,000 | | OH Air Quality Devel. Authority (FirstEnergy Generation)5 | | | 3.750 | 10 | | | 12/01/2023 | | | | 4,301,250 | |
10,795,000 | | OH Air Quality Devel. Authority (FirstEnergy Generation)5 | | | 4.250 | 10 | | | 08/01/2029 | | | | 10,417,175 | |
5,400,000 | | OH HFA (Sanctuary at Springboro) | | | 5.450 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 5,380,506 | |
18,700,000 | | OH Higher Educational Facility Commission (Hiram College)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 10/01/2041 | | | | 19,380,119 | |
1,500,000 | | OH Water Devel. Authority (FirstEnergy Generation)5 | | | 3.000 | | | | 05/15/2019 | | | | 832,500 | |
1,330,000 | | Port of Greater Cincinnati, OH Devel. Authority (Public Parking Infrastructure) | | | 6.300 | | | | 02/15/2024 | | | | 1,324,441 | |
2,500,000 | | Port of Greater Cincinnati, OH Devel. Authority (Public Parking Infrastructure) | | | 6.400 | | | | 02/15/2034 | | | | 2,478,100 | |
4,100,000 | | Southeastern OH Port Authority Hospital Facility (Memorial Health System)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 4,417,914 | |
1,225,000 | | Toledo-Lucas County, OH Port Authority (Storypoint/SL2016/SLW/SLC Obligated Group) | | | 6.125 | | | | 01/15/2034 | | | | 1,279,525 | |
1,700,000 | | Toledo-Lucas County, OH Port Authority (Storypoint/SL2016/SLW/SLC Obligated Group) | | | 6.375 | | | | 01/15/2051 | | | | 1,778,387 | |
1,482,499 | | Toledo-Lucas County, OH Port Authority (Town Square at Levis Commons)1 | | | 5.400 | | | | 11/01/2036 | | | | 1,454,984 | |
3,415,000 | | Warren County, OH Port Authority (Corridor 75 Park)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 12/01/2034 | | | | 3,484,051 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 479,893,463 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Oklahoma—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5,000,000 | | Atoka County, OK Healthcare Authority (Atoka Memorial Hospital) | | | 6.625 | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 4,000,000 | |
4,635,000 | | Grady County, OK Criminal Justice Authority1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 11/01/2041 | | | | 4,726,958 | |
14,000,000 | | OK Devel. Finance Authority (OU Medicine)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/15/2057 | | | | 15,945,300 | |
|
43 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Oklahoma (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$100,000 | | OK Ordnance Works Authority Sewer & Solid Waste Disposal Facilities (Ralston Purina Group)1 | | | 6.500 | % | | | 09/01/2026 | | | $ | 100,328 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,772,586 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Oregon—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
700,000 | | OR Facilities Authority (Concordia University)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 09/01/2030 | | | | 751,282 | |
2,625,000 | | OR Facilities Authority (Personalized Learning- Redmond Proficiency Academy)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/15/2051 | | | | 2,584,444 | |
1,740,000 | | OR Facilities Authority (Personalized Learning- Redmond Proficiency Academy)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 06/15/2046 | | | | 1,789,503 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 5,125,229 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Pennsylvania—3.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,000,000 | | Allentown, PA Neighborhood Improvement Zone1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2033 | | | | 1,104,650 | |
3,000,000 | | Allentown, PA Neighborhood Improvement Zone1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2042 | | | | 3,262,740 | |
22,300,000 | | Beaver County, PA IDA (FirstEnergy Generation)5 | | | 4.500 | 10 | | | 06/01/2028 | | | | 21,519,500 | |
2,700,000 | | Chester County, PA H&EFA (Immaculata University)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 11/01/2041 | | | | 3,341,844 | |
5,180,000 | | Chester County, PA IDA (Hickman Friends Senior Community of West Chester) | | | 5.500 | | | | 01/01/2052 | | | | 5,086,449 | |
2,750,000 | | Crawford County, PA Hospital Authority (MMedC/ COHS/MMedCF/MPS/HCCO/TAHC/TAH/TAHCF/ TAHS/CVHC/HCrawC/FCIM Obligated Group) | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2046 | | | | 2,953,802 | |
3,215,000 | | Crawford County, PA Hospital Authority (MMedC/ COHS/MMedCF/MPS/HCCO/TAHC/TAH/TAHCF/ TAHS/CVHC/HCrawC/FCIM Obligated Group) | | | 6.000 | | | | 06/01/2051 | | | | 3,442,461 | |
5,180,000 | | Lancaster, PA GO1,2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 5,328,459 | |
4,395,000 | | Lancaster, PA GO1,2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2040 | | | | 4,498,370 | |
5,655,000 | | Lancaster, PA GO1,2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2041 | | | | 5,783,199 | |
7,425,000 | | Lancaster, PA GO1,2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2042 | | | | 7,587,013 | |
4,775,000 | | Lancaster, PA GO1,2 | | | 4.000 | | | | 11/01/2043 | | | | 4,875,132 | |
355,000 | | Luzerne County, PA IDA1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 12/15/2019 | | | | 368,859 | |
500,000 | | Luzerne County, PA IDA1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/15/2027 | | | | 540,830 | |
1,010,000 | | Montgomery County, PA HEHA (Pennsylvania LTC)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2032 | | | | 1,009,929 | |
1,705,000 | | Montgomery County, PA HEHA (Pennsylvania LTC)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 12/01/2037 | | | | 1,711,104 | |
500,000 | | Montgomery County, PA HEHA (Pennsylvania LTC)1 | | | 5.300 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 490,810 | |
3,140,000 | | Montgomery County, PA HEHA (Pennsylvania LTC)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 12/01/2047 | | | | 3,114,535 | |
8,238,655 | | Northampton County, PA IDA (Northampton Generating)4,6,9 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/31/2023 | | | | 2,471,596 | |
1,499,147 | | Northampton County, PA IDA (Northampton Generating)4,6,9 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/31/2023 | | | | 449,744 | |
3,750,000 | | PA Commonwealth Financing Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2034 | | | | 4,207,650 | |
15,000,000 | | PA EDFA (FirstEnergy Generation)5 | | | 4.500 | 10 | | | 06/01/2028 | | | | 14,475,000 | |
1,210,000 | | PA EDFA (UPMC/M-WHOUPMC/UPMC-P/UPMC-PS/UPMC-SM Obligated Group)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/15/2036 | | | | 1,236,076 | |
|
44 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Pennsylvania (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$11,500,000 | | PA Geisinger Authority Health System, Series A8 | | | 5.250 | % | | | 06/01/2039 | | | $ | 11,841,550 | |
2,150,000 | | PA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 09/15/2031 | | | | 2,267,347 | |
2,980,000 | | PA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 09/15/2032 | | | | 3,131,771 | |
12,500,000 | | PA GO1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2035 | | | | 12,942,875 | |
5,000,000 | | PA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2032 | | | | 5,724,100 | |
4,000,000 | | PA HEFA (Shippensburg University)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 10/01/2043 | | | | 4,362,080 | |
1,370,000 | | PA HEFA (Ursinus College)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2027 | | | | 1,451,392 | |
15,819,000 | | PA HFA Multifamily Hsg. (Country Commons Apartments) | | | 3.600 | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 15,844,627 | |
3,000,000 | | PA Public School Building Authority (School District of Philadelphia)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2030 | | | | 3,188,370 | |
20,000,000 | | PA State Public School Building Authority (Philadelphia School District)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2032 | | | | 22,427,000 | |
1,500,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Architecture & Design Charter School)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 03/15/2043 | | | | 1,095,645 | |
725,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Green Woods Charter School)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/15/2022 | | | | 756,008 | |
2,000,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Green Woods Charter School)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 06/15/2032 | | | | 2,073,060 | |
8,075,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (Temple University)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2033 | | | | 9,126,850 | |
8,430,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Authority for Industrial Devel. (University of the Arts)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/15/2045 | | | | 8,571,203 | |
2,390,000 | | Philadelphia, PA Gas Works1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2033 | | | | 2,696,828 | |
3,350,000 | | Philadelphia, PA H&HEFA (Temple University Health System)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 3,637,531 | |
5,250,000 | | Philadelphia, PA H&HEFA (Temple University Health System)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 5,674,515 | |
785,000 | | Reading, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2035 | | | | 882,748 | |
720,000 | | Reading, PA School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2036 | | | | 807,372 | |
5,580,000 | | York, PA GO1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 11/15/2041 | | | | 6,419,790 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 223,782,414 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Rhode Island—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
44,240,000 | | Central Falls, RI Detention Facility4 | | | 7.250 | | | | 07/15/2035 | | | | 7,963,200 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
South Carolina—1.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6,417,000 | | Hardeeville, SC Assessment Revenue (Anderson Tract Municipal Improvement District) | | | 7.750 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 6,435,032 | |
12,555,000 | | Lancaster County, SC School District8 | | | 4.000 | | | | 03/01/2036 | | | | 13,101,768 | |
13,172,000 | | Richland County, SC Assessment Revenue (Village at Sandhill Improvement District)6 | | | 6.200 | | | | 11/01/2036 | | | | 11,868,631 | |
7,050,507 | | SC Connector 2000 Assoc. Toll Road, Series B | | | 2.879 | 7 | | | 01/01/2020 | | | | 6,393,470 | |
189,461 | | SC Connector 2000 Assoc. Toll Road, Series B | | | 6.295 | 7 | | | 01/01/2026 | | | | 113,110 | |
7,995,545 | | SC Connector 2000 Assoc. Toll Road, Series B | | | 6.619 | 7 | | | 01/01/2024 | | | | 4,830,028 | |
11,170,000 | | SC Public Service Authority1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2050 | | | | 11,893,034 | |
5,070,000 | | SC Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 5,359,193 | |
|
45 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
South Carolina (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$6,465,000 | | SC Public Service Authority (Santee Cooper)1 | | | 5.500 | % | | | 12/01/2033 | | | $ | 7,168,069 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 67,162,335 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tennessee—0.5% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,000,000 | | Bristol, TN Industrial Devel. Board | | | 5.022 | 7 | | | 12/01/2022 | | | | 823,670 | |
9,000,000 | | Shelby County, TN HE&HFB (Trezevant Manor) | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/01/2047 | | | | 8,610,120 | |
6,350,000 | | Shelby County, TN HE&HFB (Trezevant Manor)5 | | | 8.000 | | | | 09/01/2044 | | | | 6,329,934 | |
15,000,000 | | TN Energy Acquisition Gas Corp.1 | | | 4.000 | 10 | | | 05/01/2048 | | | | 15,931,650 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 31,695,374 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Texas—11.7% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
890,000 | | Argyle, TX Special Assessment (Highlands Argyle Public Improvement District No. 1) | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2037 | | | | 886,716 | |
1,475,000 | | Argyle, TX Special Assessment (Highlands Argyle Public Improvement District No. 1) | | | 5.250 | | | | 09/01/2047 | | | | 1,470,560 | |
1,325,000 | | Arlington, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Leadership Prep School)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/15/2046 | | | | 1,336,898 | |
785,000 | | Arlington, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (UMEP)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2053 | | | | 758,208 | |
700,000 | | Aubrey, TX Special Assessment (Jackson Ridge Public Improvement District No. 1)1 | | | 7.250 | | | | 09/01/2045 | | | | 718,361 | |
250,000 | | Beaumont, TX Multifamily HDC (Madison on the Lake Apartments)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 12/01/2028 | | | | 235,410 | |
41,315,000 | | Brazos River Authority, TX Pollution Control (TXU Energy Company)5,6,11 | | | 5.000 | | | | 03/01/2041 | | | | — | |
13,500,000 | | Brazos River Authority, TX Pollution Control (TXU Energy Company)5,6,11 | | | 5.400 | | | | 05/01/2029 | | | | — | |
2,345,000 | | Brazos River Authority, TX Pollution Control (TXU Energy Company)5,6,11 | | | 6.300 | | | | 07/01/2032 | | | | — | |
11,420,000 | | Brazos River Authority, TX Pollution Control (TXU Energy Company)5,6,11 | | | 6.750 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | — | |
10,000,000 | | Brazos River Authority, TX Pollution Control (TXU Energy Company)5,6,11 | | | 7.700 | | | | 03/01/2032 | | | | — | |
26,120,000 | | Brazos River Authority, TX Pollution Control (TXU Energy Company)5,6,11 | | | 7.700 | | | | 04/01/2033 | | | | — | |
1,925,000 | | Brushy Creek, TX Regional Utility Authority1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2030 | | | | 2,078,018 | |
2,000,000 | | Brushy Creek, TX Regional Utility Authority1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2031 | | | | 2,144,200 | |
2,000,000 | | Brushy Creek, TX Regional Utility Authority1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2032 | | | | 2,129,540 | |
1,755,000 | | Brushy Creek, TX Regional Utility Authority1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2033 | | | | 1,862,283 | |
15,135,000 | | Cambridge, TX Student Hsg. (Cambridge Student Hsg. Devel.)5 | | | 7.000 | | | | 11/01/2039 | | | | 11,719,333 | |
675,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 09/01/2028 | | | | 678,091 | |
400,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/01/2032 | | | | 400,504 | |
1,100,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 09/01/2040 | | | | 1,104,477 | |
1,895,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 09/01/2045 | | | | 1,958,615 | |
4,020,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment | | | 7.500 | | | | 09/01/2045 | | | | 4,357,157 | |
1,000,000 | | Celina, TX Special Assessment (Sutton Fields II) | | | 7.250 | | | | 09/01/2045 | | | | 996,390 | |
750,000 | | Clifton, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Idea Public Schools)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/15/2041 | | | | 831,975 | |
|
46 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Texas (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,250,000 | | Crane, TX Independent School District1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 02/15/2030 | | | $ | 1,253,775 | |
34,970,000 | | Denton, TX Independent School District8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2045 | | | | 39,182,029 | |
1,400,000 | | Flower Mound, TX Special Assessment (River Walk Public Improvement District No. 1)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 09/01/2028 | | | | 1,422,120 | |
1,500,000 | | Flower Mound, TX Special Assessment (River Walk Public Improvement District No. 1)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 09/01/2036 | | | | 1,524,210 | |
2,000,000 | | Flower Mound, TX Special Assessment (River Walk Public Improvement District No. 1)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 09/01/2043 | | | | 2,027,140 | |
2,100,000 | | Galveston, TX Special Assessment2 | | | 5.625 | | | | 09/01/2028 | | | | 1,787,352 | |
3,700,000 | | Galveston, TX Special Assessment | | | 6.000 | | | | 09/01/2038 | | | | 3,125,760 | |
3,500,000 | | Galveston, TX Special Assessment | | | 6.125 | | | | 09/01/2044 | | | | 2,951,375 | |
15,000,000 | | Grand Parkway, TX Transportation Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2043 | | | | 17,174,850 | |
32,525,000 | | Grand Parkway, TX Transportation Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2048 | | | | 37,095,738 | |
10,000,000 | | Grand Parkway, TX Transportation Corp.8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2053 | | | | 10,937,000 | |
11,238,709 | | Gulf Coast, TX IDA (Microgy Holdings)5,6 | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/01/2036 | | | | 112 | |
20,000 | | Gulf Coast, TX IDA Solid Waste (Citgo Petroleum Corp.)1 | | | 8.000 | | | | 04/01/2028 | | | | 20,199 | |
3,225,000 | | Harris County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Space Center Houston)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 08/15/2028 | | | | 3,407,342 | |
6,170,000 | | Harris County-Houston, TX Sports Authority | | | 4.066 | 7 | | | 11/15/2034 | | | | 3,119,058 | |
8,250,000 | | Houston, TX Airport System (United Airlines)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2028 | | | | 9,230,843 | |
11,605,000 | | Houston, TX Airport System (United Airlines)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/15/2030 | | | | 12,603,726 | |
435,000 | | Houston, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Cosmos Foundation)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 05/15/2031 | | | | 489,162 | |
380,000 | | Houston, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Cosmos Foundation)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 05/15/2031 | | | | 427,314 | |
500,000 | | Houston, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Ninos)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2036 | | | | 514,820 | |
750,000 | | Houston, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Ninos)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2041 | | | | 770,025 | |
43,605,000 | | Lamar, TX Consolidated Independent School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2043 | | | | 49,496,472 | |
425,000 | | Leander, TX Special Assesment (Oak Creek Public Improvement District)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 09/01/2028 | | | | 425,213 | |
600,000 | | Leander, TX Special Assesment (Oak Creek Public Improvement District)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 09/01/2038 | | | | 599,964 | |
600,000 | | Leander, TX Special Assesment (Oak Creek Public Improvement District)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 09/01/2044 | | | | 600,072 | |
450,000 | | Mclendon-Chisholm, TX Special Assessment (Sonoma Public Improvement District)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 09/15/2035 | | | | 452,268 | |
400,000 | | Mclendon-Chisholm, TX Special Assessment (Sonoma Public Improvement District)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 09/15/2040 | | | | 401,032 | |
11,845,000 | | Mesquite, TX Independent School District1,2 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2043 | | | | 13,546,416 | |
8,750,000 | | Mission, TX EDC (Carbonlite Recycling) | | | 6.500 | | | | 12/01/2033 | | | | 8,615,775 | |
24,970,000 | | Mission, TX EDC (Natgasoline)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 25,800,253 | |
13,000,000 | | Mission, TX EDC (Natgasoline)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 13,432,250 | |
10,000,000 | | Navasota, TX Independent School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2048 | | | | 11,103,700 | |
|
47 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Texas (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$3,000,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (CHSTX/CMCD/CMCtrF Obligated Group)1 | | | 4.000 | % | | | 08/15/2033 | | | $ | 3,122,400 | |
2,000,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (CHSTX/CMCD/CMCtrF Obligated Group)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2034 | | | | 2,073,740 | |
3,280,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (CHSTX/CMCD/CMCtrF Obligated Group)1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/15/2035 | | | | 3,390,634 | |
4,000,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (CHSTX/CMCD/CMCtrF Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2047 | | | | 4,474,480 | |
700,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (East Grand Preparatory Academy)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/15/2046 | | | | 712,292 | |
1,200,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (East Grand Preparatory Academy)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/15/2051 | | | | 1,217,688 | |
2,085,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Jubilee Academic Center)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 08/15/2047 | | | | 2,103,306 | |
1,000,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Legacy Preparatory Charter Academy) | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2037 | | | | 1,046,510 | |
11,435,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Legacy Preparatory Charter Academy) | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2047 | | | | 11,854,550 | |
500,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Women’s University-COHF- Collegiate Hsg. Denton)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 549,355 | |
1,750,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Women’s University-COHF- Collegiate Hsg. Denton)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2048 | | | | 1,907,465 | |
2,400,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. (Women’s University-COHF- Collegiate Hsg. Denton)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2058 | | | | 2,585,856 | |
350,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (Cardinal Bay-Village on the Park Carriage Inn)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 387,793 | |
1,750,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (Cardinal Bay-Village on the Park Carriage Inn)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 1,898,540 | |
1,750,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (Cardinal Bay-Village on the Park Carriage Inn)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2051 | | | | 1,892,310 | |
400,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (MRC Senior Living- Langford Project) | | | 5.375 | | | | 11/15/2036 | | | | 406,516 | |
650,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (MRC Senior Living- Langford Project) | | | 5.500 | | | | 11/15/2046 | | | | 661,622 | |
|
48 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Texas (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$1,000,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Senior Living (MRC Senior Living-Langford Project) | | | 5.500 | % | | | 11/15/2052 | | | $ | 1,014,520 | |
1,080,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Student Hsg. (A&M University-Collegiate Hsg. Corpus Christi II)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2048 | | | | 1,103,371 | |
2,315,000 | | New Hope, TX Cultural Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Student Hsg. (A&M University-Collegiate Hsg. San Antonio)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 04/01/2048 | | | | 2,384,658 | |
1,300,000 | | New Hope, TX Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Retirement Facility (Wesleyan Homes) | | | 5.500 | | | | 01/01/2049 | | | | 1,382,836 | |
785,000 | | New Hope, TX Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Student Hsg. (Stephenville-Tarleton State University)1 | | | 5.875 | | | | 04/01/2036 | | | | 873,470 | |
1,950,000 | | New Hope, TX Educational Facilities Finance Corp. Student Hsg. (Stephenville-Tarleton State University)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 04/01/2045 | | | | 2,168,634 | |
1,600,000 | | North Central TX HFC (Village Kaufman Apartments)1 | | | 6.150 | 10 | | | 01/01/2043 | | | | 1,637,504 | |
38,000,000 | | North Central TX HFDC (Children’s Medical Center)8 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/15/2039 | | | | 39,583,555 | |
655,000 | | Pottsboro, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Imagine International Academy of North Texas)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2036 | | | | 667,805 | |
1,000,000 | | Pottsboro, TX Higher Education Finance Corp. (Imagine International Academy of North Texas)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/15/2046 | | | | 1,001,290 | |
12,875,000 | | Prosper, TX Independent School District | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2044 | | | | 14,800,843 | |
22,450,000 | | Prosper, TX Independent School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2048 | | | | 25,728,374 | |
2,000,000 | | Red River, TX Educational Finance Corp. (Houston Baptist University)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 10/01/2046 | | | | 2,220,320 | |
3,000,000 | | Red River, TX Health Facilities Devel. Corp. (Happy Harbor Methodist Home) | | | 8.000 | | | | 11/15/2049 | | | | 3,474,750 | |
10,000,000 | | Rockwall, TX Independent School District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2046 | | | | 11,122,500 | |
455,000 | | Rowlett, TX Special Assessment (Bayside Public Improvement District) | | | 6.000 | | | | 09/15/2046 | | | | 439,985 | |
1,995,000 | | Sabine Neches, TX HFC (Fox Run Apartments)1 | | | 6.150 | | | | 01/01/2043 | | | | 2,029,294 | |
4,100,000 | | Sabine River Authority, TX Pollution Control (TXU Electric Company)5,6,11 | | | 6.150 | | | | 08/01/2022 | | | | — | |
1,800,000 | | Sabine River Authority, TX Pollution Control (TXU Electric Company)5,6,11 | | | 6.450 | | | | 06/01/2021 | | | | — | |
3,125,000 | | San Antonio, TX GO COP1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2032 | | | | 3,359,594 | |
26,820,000 | | Sanger, TX Industrial Devel. Corp. (Texas Pellets)5,6 | | | 7.500 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 6,436,800 | |
7,935,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Baylor Health Care System)8 | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/15/2024 | | | | 8,043,659 | |
32,600,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Baylor Health Care System)8 | | | 6.250 | | | | 11/15/2029 | | | | 33,004,892 | |
3,810,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Buckingham Senior Living Community) | | | 5.750 | | | | 11/15/2037 | | | | 3,406,407 | |
|
49 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Texas (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$3,500,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Buckner Senior Living Ventana) | | | 6.750 | % | | | 11/15/2047 | | | $ | 3,899,280 | |
2,000,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. (Buckner Senior Living Ventana) | | | 6.750 | | | | 11/15/2052 | | | | 2,220,680 | |
13,500,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Health Facilities Devel. Corp. (Cook Childrens Medical Center)8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2033 | | | | 14,112,630 | |
27,525,000 | | Travis County, TX HFDC (Longhorn Village)1 | | | 7.125 | | | | 01/01/2046 | | | | 30,936,724 | |
1,000,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Central Regional Wastewater System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2031 | | | | 1,174,770 | |
1,000,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Central Regional Wastewater System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2032 | | | | 1,170,440 | |
1,000,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Central Regional Wastewater System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2033 | | | | 1,166,120 | |
1,000,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Central Regional Wastewater System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2034 | | | | 1,161,820 | |
2,000,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Central Regional Wastewater System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 2,316,780 | |
1,000,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Central Regional Wastewater System1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2037 | | | | 1,152,420 | |
2,495,000 | | Trinity River Authority, TX Pollution Control (TXU Electric Company)5,6,11 | | | 6.250 | | | | 05/01/2028 | | | | — | |
34,600,000 | | TX Angelina & Neches River Authority (Aspen Power)5,6 | | | 6.500 | | | | 11/01/2029 | | | | 346 | |
57,760,000 | | TX Municipal Gas Acquisition & Supply Corp.1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 12/15/2026 | | | | 67,241,304 | |
400,000 | | TX Public Finance Authority Charter School Finance Corp. (Ed-Burnham Wood)1 | | | 6.250 | | | | 09/01/2036 | | | | 400,272 | |
410,000 | | TX Student Hsg. Corp. (University of North Texas)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 410,492 | |
200,000 | | TX Student Hsg. Corp. (University of North Texas)1 | | | 6.850 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 196,376 | |
2,760,000 | | TX Water Devel. Board1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 10/15/2032 | | | | 2,955,187 | |
5,000,000 | | TX Water Devel. Board1 | | | 4.000 | | | | 10/15/2033 | | | | 5,312,400 | |
50,000,000 | | TX Water Devel. Board1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/15/2043 | | | | 57,769,500 | |
2,057,000 | | Vintage Township, TX Public Facilities Corp.1 | | | 7.375 | | | | 10/01/2038 | | | | 2,057,987 | |
6,375,000 | | Waxahachie, TX Special Assessment | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/15/2045 | | | | 6,341,021 | |
2,920,000 | | Wise County, TX (Parket County Junior College District)1 | | | 7.500 | | | | 08/15/2025 | | | | 3,223,476 | |
4,615,000 | | Wise County, TX (Parket County Junior College District)1 | | | 7.750 | | | | 08/15/2028 | | | | 5,091,176 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 725,685,420 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Utah—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
195,000 | | Hideout, UT Local District No. 1 Special Assessment2 | | | 7.750 | | | | 08/01/2024 | | | | 211,468 | |
610,000 | | Hideout, UT Local District No. 1 Special Assessment | | | 8.250 | | | | 08/01/2034 | | | | 642,727 | |
495,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Endeavor Hall) | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/15/2022 | | | | 498,297 | |
1,750,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Endeavor Hall) | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/15/2032 | | | | 1,773,223 | |
|
50 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Utah (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$3,870,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Endeavor Hall) | | | 6.250 | % | | | 07/15/2042 | | | $ | 3,910,209 | |
4,810,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Freedom Academy Foundation) | | | 5.250 | | | | 06/15/2037 | | | | 4,884,651 | |
6,015,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Freedom Academy Foundation) | | | 5.375 | | | | 06/15/2048 | | | | 6,101,375 | |
750,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Vista Entrada School of Performing Arts & Technology)1 | | | 6.300 | | | | 07/15/2032 | | | | 812,475 | |
1,640,000 | | UT Charter School Finance Authority (Vista Entrada School of Performing Arts & Technology)1 | | | 6.550 | | | | 07/15/2042 | | | | 1,775,874 | |
800,000 | | Utah County, UT Charter School (Renaissance Academy)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 07/15/2037 | | | | 800,240 | |
415,000 | | Utah County, UT Charter School (Ronald Wilson Reagan Academy)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2036 | | | | 425,462 | |
855,000 | | Utah County, UT Charter School (Ronald Wilson Reagan Academy)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/15/2046 | | | | 868,389 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 22,704,390 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vermont—0.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,650,000 | | VT EDA (Casella Waste Systems)1 | | | 4.625 | 10 | | | 04/01/2036 | | | | 1,650,544 | |
5,990,000 | | VT Educational & Health Buildings Financing Agency (UVHN/CVMCtr/UVMedC/ CVPHMC/ECHosp Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2046 | | | | 6,574,684 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 8,225,228 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Virginia—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1,608,000 | | Celebrate, VA North CDA Special Assessment4,6 | | | 6.750 | | | | 03/01/2034 | | | | 964,800 | |
4,562,000 | | Celebrate, VA South CDA Special Assessment5,6 | | | 6.250 | | | | 03/01/2037 | | | | 1,596,700 | |
8,000,000 | | Chesapeake Bay, VA Bridge & Tunnel District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 8,898,960 | |
2,876,000 | | Lewistown, VA Commerce Center Community Devel. Authority1 | | | 6.050 | | | | 03/01/2044 | | | | 2,790,554 | |
1,258,000 | | Lewistown, VA Commerce Center Community Devel. Authority | | | 6.050 | | | | 03/01/2044 | | | | 1,220,625 | |
1,965,000 | | Lewistown, VA Commerce Center Community Devel. Authority4 | | | 6.050 | | | | 03/01/2054 | | | | 358,612 | |
2,900,000 | | New Port, VA CDA5,6 | | | 5.600 | | | | 09/01/2036 | | | | 1,319,500 | |
2,160,000 | | Richmond, VA Redevel. & Hsg. Authority (American Tobacco Apartments)1 | | | 5.550 | | | | 01/01/2037 | | | | 2,204,280 | |
4,000,000 | | VA College Building Authority Educational Facilities (21st Century College and Equipment)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2032 | | | | 4,725,760 | |
1,690,000 | | VA Small Business Financing Authority (Covanta Holding Corp.)1 | | | 5.000 | 10 | | | 01/01/2048 | | | | 1,718,612 | |
1,515,000 | | VA Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp.1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2047 | | | | 1,514,970 | |
2,404,674 | | West Point, VA IDA Solid Waste (Chesapeake Corp.)5,6 | | | 6.375 | | | | 03/01/2019 | | | | 48 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 27,313,421 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Washington—2.1% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
750,000 | | Greater Wenatchee, WA Regional Events Center1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/01/2027 | | | | 769,995 | |
|
51 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Washington (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$200,000 | | Kelso County, WA Hsg. Authority (Chinook & Columbia Apartments)1 | | | 5.600 | % | | | 03/01/2028 | | | $ | 200,014 | |
50,000 | | Kitsap County, WA Consolidated Hsg. Authority (Heritage Apartments)1 | | | 6.100 | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 50,037 | |
10,000,000 | | Port of Seattle, WA Revenue1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 05/01/2043 | | | | 11,169,300 | |
2,909,358 | | Tacoma, WA Consolidated Local Improvements District No. 65 | | | 5.750 | | | | 04/01/2043 | | | | 2,916,224 | |
1,500,000 | | Tes Properties, WA8 | | | 5.500 | | | | 12/01/2029 | | | | 1,548,428 | |
12,000,000 | | Tes Properties, WA8 | | | 5.625 | | | | 12/01/2038 | | | | 12,393,270 | |
21,710,000 | | WA EDFA (Columbia Pulp I) | | | 7.500 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 24,934,804 | |
2,425,000 | | WA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2030 | | | | 2,843,967 | |
14,430,000 | | WA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2037 | | | | 16,683,533 | |
8,000,000 | | WA GO1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 02/01/2040 | | | | 9,213,760 | |
18,075,000 | | WA Health Care Facilities Authority (Catholic Health Initiatives)8 | | | 6.375 | | | | 10/01/2036 | | | | 18,240,884 | |
17,410,000 | | WA Health Care Facilities Authority (Peacehealth)8 | | | 5.000 | | | | 11/01/2028 | | | | 18,019,176 | |
1,000,000 | | WA Hsg. Finance Commission (Heron’s Key) | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2045 | | | | 1,086,440 | |
1,700,000 | | WA Hsg. Finance Commission (Heron’s Key) | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2050 | | | | 1,841,865 | |
500,000 | | WA Kalispel Tribe Indians Priority District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 509,000 | |
2,250,000 | | WA Kalispel Tribe Indians Priority District1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 01/01/2032 | | | | 2,290,500 | |
1,000,000 | | WA Kalispel Tribe Indians Priority District1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 1,025,340 | |
3,000,000 | | WA Kalispel Tribe Indians Priority District1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2038 | | | | 3,076,020 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 128,812,557 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
West Virginia—0.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3,000,000 | | Brooke County, WV (Bethany College)1 | | | 6.500 | | | | 10/01/2031 | | | | 3,007,620 | |
4,500,000 | | Brooke County, WV (Bethany College)1 | | | 6.750 | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 4,510,260 | |
27,145,000 | | Harrison County, WV Tax Increment (Charles Pointe)4 | | | 7.000 | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 13,572,500 | |
3,435,000 | | Monongalia County, WV Special District Excise Tax (University Town Center) | | | 5.750 | | | | 06/01/2043 | | | | 3,584,422 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 24,674,802 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Wisconsin—2.6% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3,000,000 | | WI H&EFA (AE Nursing Centers) | | | 7.250 | | | | 06/01/2038 | | | | 2,853,450 | |
750,000 | | WI H&EFA (Beloit College)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 06/01/2035 | | | | 809,543 | |
2,015,000 | | WI H&EFA (Beloit College)1 | | | 6.125 | | | | 06/01/2039 | | | | 2,174,971 | |
6,335,000 | | WI H&EFA (Wellington Homes) | | | 6.750 | | | | 09/01/2037 | | | | 6,342,792 | |
53,000,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (American Dream at Meadowlands Project) | | | 6.750 | | | | 08/01/2031 | | | | 58,677,890 | |
22,500,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (American Dream at Meadowlands Project) | | | 7.000 | | | | 12/01/2050 | | | | 25,857,000 | |
2,075,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Bancroft Neurohealth/Bancroft Rehabilitation Services Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.125 | | | | 06/01/2048 | | | | 2,125,256 | |
1,821,047 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.360 | 7 | | | 01/01/2067 | | | | 55,287 | |
|
52 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Wisconsin (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$151,210 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.449 | %7 | | | 01/01/2066 | | | $ | 4,595 | |
7,336,930 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel)9 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2056 | | | | 7,313,305 | |
140,331 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.542 | 7 | | | 01/01/2065 | | | | 4,267 | |
142,507 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.638 | 7 | | | 01/01/2064 | | | | 4,338 | |
145,770 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.738 | 7 | | | 01/01/2063 | | | | 4,442 | |
149,034 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.841 | 7 | | | 01/01/2062 | | | | 4,546 | |
153,385 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 5.948 | 7 | | | 01/01/2061 | | | | 4,683 | |
155,561 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.059 | 7 | | | 01/01/2060 | | | | 4,754 | |
158,824 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.175 | 7 | | | 01/01/2059 | | | | 4,858 | |
163,176 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.294 | 7 | | | 01/01/2058 | | | | 4,996 | |
167,527 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.418 | 7 | | | 01/01/2057 | | | | 5,136 | |
151,210 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.548 | 7 | | | 01/01/2056 | | | | 4,641 | |
154,473 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.682 | 7 | | | 01/01/2055 | | | | 4,747 | |
157,737 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.823 | 7 | | | 01/01/2054 | | | | 4,854 | |
163,176 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 6.969 | 7 | | | 01/01/2053 | | | | 5,027 | |
165,352 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 7.122 | 7 | | | 01/01/2052 | | | | 5,101 | |
127,277 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 7.282 | 7 | | | 01/01/2051 | | | | 3,933 | |
129,453 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 7.449 | 7 | | | 01/01/2050 | | | | 4,005 | |
133,804 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 7.624 | 7 | | | 01/01/2049 | | | | 4,147 | |
135,980 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 7.807 | 7 | | | 01/01/2048 | | | | 4,222 | |
155,561 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Conference Center & Hotel) | | | 8.000 | 7 | | | 01/01/2047 | | | | 4,838 | |
865,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (DHSEP/NMA/CAA/ HCA/HAA/HA/LV/MwA/WA/WHA Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2052 | | | | 856,532 | |
5,200,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (FNC&M / FBA / FCP / FFC / FGC / FJeffC / FJC / FMN / FTS / FP1 / FP2 / FRB Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 12/01/2045 | | | | 5,463,172 | |
|
53 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Wisconsin (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$3,800,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (FNC&M / FBA / FCP / FFC / FGC / FJeffC / FJC / FMN / FTS / FP1 / FP2 / FRB Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.150 | % | | | 12/01/2050 | | | $ | 4,005,922 | |
6,790,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (FNC&M / FBA / FCP / FFC / FGC / FJeffC / FJC / FMN / FTS / FP1 / FP2 / FRB Obligated Group)1 | | | 5.350 | | | | 12/01/2052 | | | | 7,220,622 | |
1,335,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Las Ventanas Retirement Community) | | | 0.210 | 7 | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 674,482 | |
6,657,500 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Las Ventanas Retirement Community) | | | 7.000 | | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 6,680,402 | |
2,000,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Las Ventanas Retirement Community)6 | | | 36.095 | 7 | | | 10/01/2042 | | | | 41,200 | |
660,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority (Thomas Jefferson Classical Academy)1 | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 671,669 | |
7,000,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Charter School (Denver International Airport Great Hall)1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 09/30/2049 | | | | 7,655,760 | |
2,500,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Charter School (Envision Science Academy) | | | 5.250 | | | | 05/01/2046 | | | | 2,384,025 | |
1,175,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Charter School (Explore Knowledge Foundation)1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/15/2032 | | | | 1,253,008 | |
845,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Charter School (Explore Knowledge Foundation)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/15/2042 | | | | 897,635 | |
1,910,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Educational Facility (Ask Academy)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 02/01/2045 | | | | 1,880,128 | |
5,875,000 | | WI Public Finance Authority Educational Facility (Horizon Academy West Charter School)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 09/01/2045 | | | | 5,916,830 | |
10,960,000 | | WI Public Financing Authority Multifamily Hsg. (Trinity-Eagle’s Point)1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 01/01/2052 | | | | 11,374,507 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 163,277,518 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Possessions—11.7% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
26,420,000 | | Northern Mariana Islands Commonwealth, Series B | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2033 | | | | 24,735,725 | |
10,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority, AGC | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 10,293 | |
11,980,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 10,093,150 | |
250,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 210,625 | |
25,035,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 21,091,987 | |
3,325,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 2,826,250 | |
7,645,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2044 | | | | 6,498,250 | |
30,945,000 | | Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Authority | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2047 | | | | 26,071,162 | |
9,475,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)1 | | | 5.375 | | | | 05/15/2033 | | | | 9,568,044 | |
7,260,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 05/15/2039 | | | | 7,307,480 | |
46,330,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC)1 | | | 5.625 | | | | 05/15/2043 | | | | 46,735,387 | |
28,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC) | | | 6.749 | 7 | | | 05/15/2050 | | | | 3,101,000 | |
152,450,000 | | Puerto Rico Children’s Trust Fund (TASC) | | | 9.352 | 7 | | | 05/15/2055 | | | | 9,531,174 | |
285,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, AGC12 | | | 3.483 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 285,712 | |
1,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 630,000 | |
5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 2,100,000 | |
2,550,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 1,045,500 | |
|
54 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$10,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, AGC1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 07/01/2034 | | | $ | 10,190 | |
1,660,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2034 | | | | 697,200 | |
6,765,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 2,706,000 | |
450,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.125 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 189,000 | |
2,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.125 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 820,000 | |
5,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, AGC | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 5,369 | |
1,920,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 806,400 | |
2,165,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 909,300 | |
40,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2018 | | | | 16,700 | |
14,695,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 6,024,950 | |
3,255,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 1,334,550 | |
340,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 139,400 | |
62,180,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 25,493,800 | |
11,540,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 4,731,400 | |
1,345,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO, AGC | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 1,385,337 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 1,260,000 | |
65,250,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 26,752,500 | |
2,625,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,095,937 | |
1,480,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 621,600 | |
12,250,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 5,145,000 | |
9,265,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 3,891,300 | |
14,550,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 6,111,000 | |
13,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 6.500 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 5,427,500 | |
1,545,000 | | Puerto Rico Commonwealth GO5 | | | 8.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 621,862 | |
1,501,705 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 942,320 | |
1,501,705 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 942,320 | |
1,629,052 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 01/01/2021 | | | | 1,022,230 | |
1,629,051 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 1,022,229 | |
543,017 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 01/01/2022 | | | | 340,743 | |
543,018 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority5 | | | 10.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 340,744 | |
3,100,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 1,898,750 | |
7,070,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 4,330,375 | |
11,925,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A5 | | | 5.050 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 7,304,063 | |
20,375,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A5 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 12,581,562 | |
480,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A5 | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 301,200 | |
9,080,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A5 | | | 7.000 | | | | 07/01/2043 | | | | 5,697,700 | |
160,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series A5 | | | 7.250 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 100,400 | |
40,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 24,500 | |
40,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 24,500 | |
10,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 6,125 | |
4,570,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 2,799,125 | |
2,600,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 1,592,500 | |
445,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 272,563 | |
95,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series AAA5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 58,188 | |
310,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 189,875 | |
35,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 21,438 | |
20,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 12,250 | |
285,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 174,563 | |
|
55 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$540,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC5 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 07/01/2028 | | | $ | 330,750 | |
2,570,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 1,574,125 | |
385,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series CCC5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 235,813 | |
185,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series DDD5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 113,313 | |
15,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series NN5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 9,187 | |
170,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2017 | | | | 103,700 | |
20,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2018 | | | | 12,200 | |
5,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2020 | | | | 3,062 | |
55,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 33,687 | |
210,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 128,625 | |
280,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 171,500 | |
15,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 9,187 | |
895,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 548,187 | |
1,990,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 1,218,875 | |
7,355,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2032 | | | | 4,504,937 | |
6,100,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series TT5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 3,736,250 | |
390,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series UU5 | | | 0.000 | 10 | | | 07/01/2017 | | | | 236,925 | |
22,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series VV, NPFGC | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 23,316,700 | |
685,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 419,563 | |
185,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 113,313 | |
415,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 254,188 | |
85,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW5 | | | 5.375 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 52,063 | |
390,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW5 | | | 5.375 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 238,875 | |
60,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 36,750 | |
605,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series WW5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2038 | | | | 370,563 | |
10,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 6,125 | |
845,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 517,563 | |
2,660,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 1,629,250 | |
38,430,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2040 | | | | 23,538,375 | |
18,575,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series XX5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 11,377,188 | |
190,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ5 | | | 4.625 | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 116,375 | |
820,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2017 | | | | 500,200 | |
95,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 58,188 | |
850,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 520,625 | |
215,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 131,688 | |
10,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 6,125 | |
25,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 15,313 | |
50,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 30,625 | |
380,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2024 | | | | 232,750 | |
275,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2025 | | | | 168,438 | |
1,135,000 | | Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, Series ZZ5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 695,188 | |
215,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 221,272 | |
45,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2027 | | | | 46,318 | |
1,360,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 826,200 | |
2,175,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2028 | | | | 101,377 | |
|
56 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$250,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, NPFGC1 | | | 5.000 | % | | | 07/01/2029 | | | $ | 250,255 | |
1,035,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 628,762 | |
7,895,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority5 | | | 5.300 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 4,796,212 | |
25,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 27,633 | |
5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2029 | | | | 3,037,500 | |
3,250,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2030 | | | | 1,974,375 | |
45,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 45,871 | |
350,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, FGIC13 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2021 | | | | 280,000 | |
9,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 9,362,610 | |
605,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series H5 | | | 5.450 | | | | 07/01/2035 | | | | 124,025 | |
4,715,000 | | Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority, Series M5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2046 | | | | 966,575 | |
5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2031 | | | | 525,000 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 315,000 | |
7,300,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure (Mepsi Campus)5 | | | 6.500 | | | | 10/01/2037 | | | | 1,478,250 | |
25,000 | | Puerto Rico Infrastructure Financing Authority, AGC1 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 25,327 | |
2,500,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Cogeneration Facilities) | | | 6.625 | | | | 06/01/2026 | | | | 2,374,434 | |
4,050,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (Hospital Auxilio Mutuo)1 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 4,217,022 | |
300,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (University of the Sacred Heart) | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2020 | | | | 285,750 | |
100,000 | | Puerto Rico ITEMECF (University of the Sacred Heart) | | | 5.000 | | | | 10/01/2021 | | | | 94,500 | |
25,000 | | Puerto Rico Municipal Finance Agency, Series B, AGC1 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2019 | | | | 25,658 | |
3,870,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2032 | | | | 1,562,512 | |
4,880,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 1,970,300 | |
150,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.000 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 60,562 | |
100,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 39,375 | |
1,640,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2033 | | | | 662,150 | |
83,395,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2042 | | | | 32,836,781 | |
260,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 102,375 | |
200,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 07/01/2037 | | | | 80,750 | |
5,860,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.625 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 2,365,975 | |
12,845,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 07/01/2022 | | | | 5,057,719 | |
7,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 5.875 | | | | 07/01/2039 | | | | 2,756,250 | |
8,825,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.000 | | | | 07/01/2041 | | | | 3,474,844 | |
12,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.125 | | | | 07/01/2023 | | | | 4,845,000 | |
5,100,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.250 | | | | 07/01/2026 | | | | 2,059,125 | |
4,980,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority4 | | | 6.750 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 2,010,675 | |
1,515,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Buildings Authority, Series D4 | | | 5.250 | | | | 07/01/2036 | | | | 611,681 | |
49,020,000 | | Puerto Rico Public Finance Corp., Series B4 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2031 | | | | 1,348,050 | |
9,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp.5 | | | 6.900 | 3 | | | 08/01/2026 | | | | 3,895,000 | |
|
57 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
U.S. Possessions (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
$220,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp. (Build America Bonds)5 | | | 5.750 | % | | | 08/01/2042 | | | $ | 90,200 | |
42,745,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 0.000 | 3 | | | 08/01/2033 | | | | 14,205,873 | |
1,590,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2019 | | | | 651,900 | |
1,630,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2024 | | | | 668,300 | |
15,735,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 6,451,350 | |
11,885,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2027 | | | | 4,872,850 | |
41,045,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.375 | | | | 08/01/2039 | | | | 16,828,450 | |
700,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2023 | | | | 287,000 | |
4,145,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2028 | | | | 1,699,450 | |
14,720,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2037 | | | | 6,035,200 | |
47,645,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 19,534,450 | |
44,060,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/01/2037 | | | | 18,064,600 | |
44,365,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A, NPFGC | | | 5.826 | 7 | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 11,853,884 | |
46,950,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A, NPFGC | | | 5.829 | 7 | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 13,224,876 | |
17,500,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A, NPFGC | | | 5.830 | 7 | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 5,196,625 | |
2,250,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 6.125 | | | | 08/01/2029 | | | | 922,500 | |
3,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 6.375 | | | | 08/01/2039 | | | | 1,230,000 | |
34,275,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 6.500 | | | | 08/01/2044 | | | | 14,052,750 | |
7,945,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 7.886 | 7 | | | 08/01/2034 | | | | 936,795 | |
37,060,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A5 | | | 8.691 | 7 | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 4,343,061 | |
30,980,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series A-15 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2043 | | | | 12,701,800 | |
330,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 4.000 | | | | 08/01/2026 | | | | 275,550 | |
300,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2035 | | | | 123,000 | |
135,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 5.000 | | | | 08/01/2046 | | | | 112,725 | |
61,720,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 5.250 | | | | 08/01/2041 | | | | 25,305,200 | |
3,670,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 5.375 | | | | 08/01/2036 | | | | 1,504,700 | |
5,290,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 5.375 | | | | 08/01/2038 | | | | 2,168,900 | |
10,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 5.500 | | | | 08/01/2040 | | | | 4,100,000 | |
19,555,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 5.750 | | | | 08/01/2057 | | | | 16,377,313 | |
5,000,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/01/2039 | | | | 2,050,000 | |
65,695,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 6.000 | | | | 08/01/2042 | | | | 26,934,950 | |
10,865,000 | | Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corp., Series C5 | | | 6.750 | 3 | | | 08/01/2032 | | | | 4,454,650 | |
50,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series P | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2021 | | | | 38,750 | |
100,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series P | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2022 | | | | 77,500 | |
5,000,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series P | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2030 | | | | 3,875,000 | |
1,025,000 | | University of Puerto Rico, Series Q | | | 5.000 | | | | 06/01/2036 | | | | 794,375 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | 727,168,228 | |
Total Municipal Bonds and Notes (Cost $7,645,917,293) | | | | | | | | | | | 7,064,726,092 | |
Corporate Bonds and Notes—0.1% | |
3,030,000 | | TX German Pellets Series Secured Note, Series 20161,6,14 | | | 8.000 | | | | 12/10/2018 | | | | 2,424,000 | |
|
58 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | | | Coupon | | Maturity | | | Value | |
Corporate Bonds and Notes (Continued) | |
$2,890,000 | | TX German Pellets Series Secured Note, Series 20161,6,14 | | | 8.000 | % | | | 12/10/2018 | | | $ | 2,312,000 | |
Total Corporate Bonds and Notes (Cost $5,920,000) | | | | | | | | | | | 4,736,000 | |
Corporate Loans—0.0% | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6,000,000 | | Aspen Power Senior Secured Bridge Promissory Note5,6,14 | | | 9.000 | 10 | | | 11/16/2018 | | | | 446,338 | |
2,750,000 | | Aspen Power Senior Secured Bridge Promissory Note5,6,14 | | | 9.000 | 10 | | | 11/16/2018 | | | | 204,571 | |
7,000,000 | | Aspen Power Senior Secured Bridge Promissory Note5,6,14 | | | 9.000 | 10 | | | 11/16/2018 | | | | 520,727 | |
3,500,000 | | Aspen Power Senior Secured Bridge Promissory Note5,6,14 | | | 9.000 | 10 | | | 11/16/2018 | | | | 260,364 | |
Total Corporate Loans (Cost $19,250,000) | | | | | | | | | | | 1,432,000 | |
| | | | |
Shares | | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks—0.0% | |
7,679 | | Delta Air Lines, Inc.14 | | | | | | | | | | | 417,891 | |
2,919 | | General Motors Co.14 | | | | | | | | | | | 110,660 | |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $54,137) | | | | | | | | | | | 528,551 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Investments, at Value (Cost $7,671,141,430)—113.7% | | | | | | | | | | | 7,071,422,643 | |
Net Other Assets (Liabilities)—(13.7) | | | | | | | | | | | (850,707,608 | ) |
Net Assets—100.0% | | | | | | | | | | $ | 6,220,715,035 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Footnotes to Statement of Investments
1. All or a portion of the security position has been segregated for collateral to cover borrowings. See Note 9 of the accompanying Notes.
2. All or a portion of the security position is when-issued or delayed delivery to be delivered and settled after period end. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
3. Denotes a step bond: a zero coupon bond that converts to a fixed or variable interest rate at a designated future date.
4. This security is accruing partial income at an anticipated effective rate based on expected interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate.
5. This security is not accruing income because its issuer has missed or is expected to miss interest and/or principal payments. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
6. The value of this security was determined using significant unobservable inputs. See Note 3 of the accompanying Notes.
7. Zero coupon bond reflects effective yield on the original acquisition date.
8. Security represents the underlying municipal bond with respect to an inverse floating rate security held by the Fund. The bond was purchased by the Fund and subsequently transferred to a trust, which issued the related inverse floating rate security. See Note 4 of the accompanying Notes.
9. Interest or dividend is paid-in-kind, when applicable.
10. This interest rate resets periodically. Interest rate shown reflects the rate in effect at period end. The rate on this variable rate security is not based on a published reference rate and spread but is determined by the issuer or agent based on current market conditions.
11. Security received as the result of issuer reorganization.
12. Denotes an inflation-indexed security: coupon or principal are indexed to a consumer price index.
|
59 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
Footnotes to Statement of Investments (Continued)
13. The issuer of this security has missed or is expected to miss interest and/or principal payments on this security. The security is insured and is accruing partial income at a rate anticipated to be recovered through the insurer. The rate shown is the contractual interest rate.
14. Received as a result of a corporate action.
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below:
| | |
AAD | | AHFO-Arbors at Denton |
AAHI | | AHFO-Arbors at Huntsville I |
AAHII | | AHFO-Arbors at Huntsville II |
ACMC | | Advocate Condell Medical Center |
AE | | American Eagle |
AGC | | Assured Guaranty Corp. |
AH&HC | | Advocate Health & Hospitals Corp. |
AHCN | | Advocate Health Care Metro |
AHF | | American Housing Foundation |
AHFO | | Atlantic Hsg. Foundation |
AHFP | | American Housing Foundation Properties |
ANSHN | | Advocate North Side Health Network |
APH | | AHFO-Palm House |
ASUN | | Arizona State University |
AW | | AHFO-Westfield |
AWHC | | AHF-Windover Health Club |
BethH | | Bethesda Hospital |
BHI | | Baptist Homes of Indiana |
BHlth | | Bethesda Health |
BHM | | Baptist Hospital of Miami |
BHSF | | Baptist Health South Florida |
BOS | | Baptist Outpatient Services |
BVHF | | Blanchard Valley Health Foundation |
BVRHC | | Blanchard Valley Regional Health Care |
CAA | | Cooks Avenue Affordable |
CDA | | Communities Devel. Authority |
CCHCS | | Cook Children’s Health Care System |
CCMCtr | | Cook Children’s Medical Center |
CCPN | | Cook Children’s Physical Network |
CDA | | Communities Devel. Authority |
CDHA | | Central Dupage Hospital Association |
CDHDHS | | CDH-Deinor Health System |
CDHS | | Central Dupage Health System |
CDPG | | Central DuPage Physician Group |
CHCC | | Community Hospitals of Central California |
CHSTX | | Children’s Health System of Texas |
CMCD | | Children’s Medical Center of Dallas |
CMCtrF | | Children’s Medical Center Foundation |
COHF | | Collegiate Housing Foundation |
COHS | | Community Health Service |
COP | | Certificates of Participation |
CVHC | | Conneaut Valley Health Center |
CVMCtr | | Central Vermont Medical Center |
CVPHMC | | Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center |
|
60 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
DA | | Dormitory Authority |
DCH | | Delnor-Community Hospital |
DHSEP | | Dogwoood Housing Southeast Portfolio |
DrsH | | Doctors Hospital |
ECHosp | | Elizabethtown Community Hospital |
EDA | | Economic Devel. Authority |
EDC | | Economic Devel. Corp. |
EDFA | | Economic Devel. Finance Authority |
EF&CD | | Environmental Facilities and Community Devel. |
ELGS | | Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan |
ELGSF | | Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Foundation |
ELGSS | | Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society |
FBA | | FFAH Beaumont Avenue |
FCHMC | | Fresno Community Hospital & Medical Center |
FCIM | | French Creek Internal Medicine |
FCommH | | Fayette Community Hospital |
FCP | | FFAH Coleridge Road |
FFAH | | Foundation for Affordable Housing |
FFC | | FFAH Franklin Court |
FGC | | FFAH Glendale Court |
FGIC | | Financial Guaranty Insurance Co. |
FHlth | | Fishermen’s Health |
FJC | | FFAH Johnson Court |
FJeffC | | FFAH Jefferson Court |
FMN | | FFAH Market North |
FNC&M | | FFAH North Carolina and Missouri |
FP1 | | FFAH Plaza 1 |
FP2 | | FFAH Plaza 2 |
FRB | | FFAH Riverview Bend |
FTS | | FFAH Tucker Street |
GO | | General Obligation |
GSSH | | Georgia Southwestern University |
H&EFA | | Health and Educational Facilities Authority |
H&HEFA | | Hospitals and Higher Education Facilities Authority |
HA | | Heatherwood Affordable |
HAA | | Hidden Acres Affordable |
HCA | | Hickory Creek Affordable |
HCCO | | Homecare Connections |
HCrawC | | Hospice of Crawford County |
HDC | | Housing Devel. Corp. |
HE&HFB | | Higher Educational and Housing Facility Board |
HEFA | | Higher Education Facilities Authority |
HEHA | | Higher Education and Health Authority |
HFA | | Housing Finance Agency |
HFC | | Housing Finance Corp. |
HFDC | | Health Facilities Devel. Corp. |
HFHS | | Henry Ford Health System |
HFMHCT | | Henry Ford Macomb Hospital Corp.-Clinton Township |
HFWH | | Henry Ford Wyandotte Hospital |
HHI | | Homestead Hospital |
|
61 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
HHlthS | | Holzer Health Systems |
HMCG | | Holzer Medical Center-Gallipolis |
HMCJ | | Holzer Medical Center-Jackson |
IDA | | Industrial Devel. Agency |
ITEMECF | | Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Community Facilities |
JFK | | John Fitzgerald Kennedy |
KCHosp | | Kishwaukee Community Hospital |
KGC | | Kuakini Geriatric Care |
KHS | | Kaukini Health System |
KMC | | Kuakini Medical Center |
KPG | | Kishwaukee Physician Group |
KS | | Kishhealth System |
KSS | | Kuakini Support Services |
LFH&FI | | Lake Forest Hospital & Fitness Institute |
LCMAS | | Little Company of Mary Ancillary Services Corp. |
LV | | Lakeview Affordable |
MarH | | Mariners Hospital |
M-WHOUPMC | | Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC |
MarH | | Mariners Hospital |
MJRH&C | | Marian Joy Rehabilitation Hospital & Clinic |
MMedC | | Meadville Medical Center |
MMedCF | | Meadville Medical Center Foundation |
MPS | | Meadville Physician Services |
MRC | | Methodist Retirement Communities |
MTA | | Metropolitan Transportation Authority |
MwA | | Mary Washington Hospital |
NMA | | New Main Affordable |
NPFGC | | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. |
NWLFH | | Northwestern Lake Forest Hospital |
NWMF | | Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation |
NWMFF | | Northwestern Memorial Foundation |
NWMH | | Northwestern Memorial Hospital |
NWMHlth | | Northwestern Memorial Healthcare |
NY/NJ | | New York/New Jersey |
NYC | | New York City |
NYS | | New York State |
OU | | Oklahoma University |
PacMedC | | PacMed Clinic |
PAS | | Presence Ambulatory Services |
PBH | | Presence Behavioral Health |
PC&SHN | | Presence Central & Suburban Hospitals Network |
PCHN | | Presence Chicago Hospitals Network |
PClinic | | Piedmont Clinic |
PCTC | | Presence Care Transformation Corp. |
PH&S | | Providence Health & Services |
PH&SO | | Providence Health & Services-Oregon |
PH&SW | | Providence Health & Services-Washington |
PH&SWW | | Providence Health & Services - Western Washington |
PHC | | Piedmont Healthcare |
PHCr | | Presence Home Care |
|
62 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
PHFBT | | Presence Health Food Foundation Board of Trustees |
PHHosp | | Piedmont Henry Hospital |
PHI | | Piedmont Heart Institute |
PHIP | | Piedmont Heart Institute Physicians |
PHlthCF | | Piedmont Healthcare Foundation |
PHN | | Presence Health Network |
PHosp | | Piedmont Hospital |
PHSSC | | Providence Health System-Southern CA |
PLC | | Presence Life Connections |
PMCC | | Piedmont Medical Care Corp. |
PMSH | | Piedmont Mountainside Hospital |
PNH | | Piedmont Newnan Hospital |
PSJH | | Providence St. Joseph Health |
PSJHCtr | | Providence St. John’s Health Center |
PSJMC | | Providence St. Joseph Medical Center |
PSSC | | Presence Senior Services - Chicagoland |
RBM | | Rocketship Brilliant Minds |
RDP | | Rocketship Discovery Prep |
RE | | Rocketship Education |
Res Rec | | Resource Recovery Facility |
REW | | Rocketship Education Wisconsin |
RLSA | | Rocketship Los Suenos Academy |
RMClinic | | Rehabilitation Medicine Clinic |
RMS | | Rocketship Mateo Sheedy |
RNNE | | Rocketship Nashville Northeast Elementary |
RRCP | | Rocketship Redwood City Prep |
RSA | | Rocketship Spark Academy |
RSCP | | Rocketship Southside Community Prep |
RSSPA | | Rocketship Si Se Puede Academy |
SE | | Swedish Edmonds |
SHlthS | | Swedish Health Services |
SJHCN | | St. Joseph Home Care Network |
SJHE | | St. Joseph Hospital of Eureka |
SJHO | | St. Joseph Hospital of Orange |
SJHS | | St. Joseph Health System |
SL2016 | | Senior Living 2016 |
SLC | | Senior Living Chesteron |
SLF | | Senior Living Fairfield |
SLFW | | Senior Living Fort Wayne |
SLW | | Senior Living Waterville |
SMH | | South Miami Hospital |
TAH | | Titusville Area Hospital |
TAHC | | Titusville Area Health Center |
TAHCF | | Titusville Area Health Foundation |
TAHS | | Titusville Area Health Service |
TASC | | Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds |
UMEP | | UME Preparatory Academy |
UPMC | | University of Pittsburgh Medical Center |
UPMC-P | | UPMC Passavant |
UPMC-PS | | UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside |
|
63 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Continued
To simplify the listings of securities, abbreviations are used per the table below: (Continued)
| | |
UPMC-SM | | UPMC St. Margaret |
UVHN | | University of Vermont Health Network |
UVMedC | | University of Vermont Medical Center |
VOA | | Volunteers of America |
VWCH | | Valley West Community Hospital |
WA | | Westlake Affordable |
WAFMH | | W A Foote Memorial Hospital |
WHA | | Weeden Heights Affordable |
WICF | | W.I. Cook Foundation |
WKBP | | West Kendall Baptist Hospital |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
64 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES July 31, 2018
| | | | |
| |
Assets | | | | |
Investments, at value (cost $7,671,141,430)—see accompanying statement of investments | | $ | 7,071,422,643 | |
| |
Cash | | | 434,496 | |
| |
Receivables and other assets: | | | | |
Investments sold on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis | | | 92,380,247 | |
Interest and dividends | | | 68,660,200 | |
Shares of beneficial interest sold | | | 10,675,486 | |
Other | | | 2,364,442 | |
| | | | |
Total assets | | | 7,245,937,514 | |
| |
Liabilities | | | | |
Payables and other liabilities: | | | | |
Payable for short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | | 683,925,000 | |
Payable for borrowings (See Note 9) | | | 132,900,000 | |
Investments purchased (including $109,854,663 purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis) | | | 191,138,794 | |
Shares of beneficial interest redeemed | | | 10,317,404 | |
Dividends | | | 5,027,252 | |
Distribution and service plan fees | | | 835,369 | |
Trustees’ compensation | | | 623,002 | |
Interest expense on borrowings | | | 82,354 | |
Shareholder communications | | | 19,497 | |
Other | | | 353,807 | |
| | | | |
Total liabilities | | | 1,025,222,479 | |
| |
Net Assets | | $ | 6,220,715,035 | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| |
Composition of Net Assets | | | | |
Paid-in capital | | $ | 8,018,540,882 | |
| |
Accumulated net investment income | | | 52,184,371 | |
| |
Accumulated net realized loss on investments | | | (1,250,291,431) | |
| |
Net unrealized depreciation on investments | | | (599,718,787) | |
| | | | |
Net Assets | | $ | 6,220,715,035 | |
| | | | |
|
65 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES Continued
| | | | |
| |
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | | |
Class A Shares: | | | | |
Net asset value and redemption price per share (based on net assets of $3,164,887,780 and 431,292,746 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.34 | |
Maximum offering price per share (net asset value plus sales charge of 4.75% of offering price) | | $ | 7.71 | |
| |
| |
Class C Shares: | | | | |
Net asset value, redemption price (excludes applicable contingent deferred sales charge) and offering price per share (based on net assets of $1,231,057,205 and 168,494,452 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.31 | |
| |
| |
Class Y Shares: | | | | |
Net asset value, redemption price and offering price per share (based on net assets of $1,824,770,050 and 248,951,067 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 7.33 | |
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
66 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS For the Year Ended July 31, 2018
| | | | |
Investment Income | | | | |
Interest | | $ | 339,732,430 | |
Dividends | | | 16,493 | |
| | | | |
Total investment income | | | 339,748,923 | |
Expenses | | | | |
Management fees | | | 21,252,387 | |
Distribution and service plan fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 7,567,977 | |
Class B1 | | | 64,313 | |
Class C | | | 11,085,643 | |
Transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees: | | | | |
Class A | | | 3,060,505 | |
Class B1 | | | 7,150 | |
Class C | | | 1,231,924 | |
Class Y | | | 1,379,657 | |
Shareholder communications: | | | | |
Class A | | | 35,050 | |
Class B1 | | | 376 | |
Class C | | | 21,766 | |
Class Y | | | 20,642 | |
Borrowing fees | | | 7,129,068 | |
Legal, auditing and other professional fees | | | 4,933,055 | |
Interest expense and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued (See Note 4) | | | 4,513,700 | |
Interest expense on borrowings | | | 1,213,516 | |
Trustees’ compensation | | | 77,581 | |
Custodian fees and expenses | | | 50,373 | |
Other | | | 53,242 | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 63,697,925 | |
Net Investment Income | | | 276,050,998 | |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | | |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | (137,548,911) | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investment transactions | | | 210,391,735 | |
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | | $ | 348,893,822 | |
| | | | |
1. Effective June 1, 2018, all Class B shares converted to Class A shares.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
67 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | |
Operations | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 276,050,998 | | | $ | 289,614,786 | |
Net realized loss | | | (137,548,911) | | | | (184,071,772) | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation | | | 210,391,735 | | | | 132,331,091 | |
| | | | |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | | | 348,893,822 | | | | 237,874,105 | |
Dividends and/or Distributions to Shareholders | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (159,145,298) | | | | (185,836,275) | |
Class B1 | | | (329,684) | | | | (1,115,064) | |
Class C | | | (56,369,148) | | | | (68,905,668) | |
Class Y | | | (74,938,103) | | | | (64,206,346) | |
| | | | |
| | | (290,782,233) | | | | (320,063,353) | |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from beneficial interest transactions: | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | | (46,720,186) | | | | (15,209,173) | |
Class B1 | | | (14,915,107) | | | | (15,086,186) | |
Class C | | | (79,703,206) | | | | (51,062,821) | |
Class Y | | | 470,600,102 | | | | 424,801,625 | |
| | | | |
| | | 329,261,603 | | | | 343,443,445 | |
Net Assets | | | | | | | | |
Total increase | | | 387,373,192 | | | | 261,254,197 | |
Beginning of period | | | 5,833,341,843 | | | | 5,572,087,646 | |
| | | | |
End of period (including accumulated net investment income of $52,184,371 and $95,220,787, respectively) | | $ | 6,220,715,035 | | | $ | 5,833,341,843 | |
| | | | |
1. Effective June 1, 2018, all Class B shares converted to Class A shares.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
68 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
STATEMENT OF
CASH FLOWS For the Year Ended July 31, 2018
| | | | |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 348,893,822 | |
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets from operations to net cash used in operating activities: | | | | |
Purchase of investment securities | | | (2,611,680,723) | |
Proceeds from disposition of investment securities | | | 2,162,204,355 | |
Short-term investment securities, net | | | 49,184,373 | |
Premium amortization | | | 30,778,133 | |
Discount accretion | | | (89,312,988) | |
Net realized loss on investment transactions | | | 137,548,911 | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investment transactions | | | (210,391,735) | |
Change in assets: | | | | |
Increase in other assets | | | (52,978) | |
Increase in interest receivable | | | (4,426,077) | |
Increase in receivable for securities sold | | | (89,175,282) | |
Change in liabilities: | | | | |
Decrease in other liabilities | | | (416,495) | |
Increase in payable for securities purchased | | | 134,968,513 | |
| | | | |
Net cash used in operating activities | | | (141,878,171) | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | |
Proceeds from borrowings | | | 1,547,900,000 | |
Payments on borrowings | | | (1,608,700,000) | |
Payments/proceeds on short-term floating rate notes issued | | | 160,940,000 | |
Proceeds from shares sold | | | 1,911,005,173 | |
Payments on shares redeemed | | | (1,829,238,194) | |
Cash distributions paid | | | (40,577,662) | |
| | | | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | | | 141,329,317 | |
Net decrease in cash | | | (548,854) | |
Cash, beginning balance | | | 983,350 | |
| | | | |
Cash, ending balance | | $ | 434,496 | |
| | | | |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of reinvestment of dividends and distributions of $250,763,411.
Cash paid for interest on borrowings—$1,297,045.
Cash paid for interest on short-term floating rate notes issued—$4,513,700.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
69 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class A | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 | |
| |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $7.27 | | | | $7.37 | | | | $6.86 | | | | $7.01 | | | | $6.87 | |
| |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.36 | | | | 0.39 | | | | 0.46 | | | | 0.51 | | | | 0.50 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.08 | | | | (0.07) | | | | 0.52 | | | | (0.18) | | | | 0.13 | |
| | | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.44 | | | | 0.32 | | | | 0.98 | | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.63 | |
| |
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.37) | | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.47) | | | | (0.48) | | | | (0.49) | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $7.34 | | | | $7.27 | | | | $7.37 | | | | $6.86 | | | | $7.01 | |
| | | | |
|
| |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 6.34% | | | | 4.47% | | | | 14.91% | | | | 4.59% | | | | 9.63% | |
|
| |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $3,164,888 | | | | $3,182,443 | | | | $3,245,013 | | | | $2,968,690 | | | | $3,260,438 | |
| |
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $3,060,512 | | | | $3,159,138 | | | | $3,064,632 | | | | $3,258,788 | | | | $3,477,994 | |
| |
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.94% | | | | 5.36% | | | | 6.54% | | | | 7.19% | | | | 7.24% | |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 0.81% | | | | 0.75% | | | | 0.74% | | | | 0.74% | | | | 0.71% | |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.15% | | | | 0.13% | | | | 0.09% | | | | 0.08% | | | | 0.09% | |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.08% | | | | 0.18% | | | | 0.17% | | | | 0.17% | | | | 0.25% | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.04% | | | | 1.06% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 0.99% | | | | 1.05% | |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.04% | | | | 1.06% | | | | 1.00% | | | | 0.99% | | | | 1.05%5 | |
| |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 34% | | | | 29% | | | | 20% | | | | 16% | | | | 16% | |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
70 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 | |
| |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $7.24 | | | | $7.35 | | | | $6.83 | | | | $6.99 | | | | $6.85 | |
| |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.31 | | | | 0.33 | | | | 0.41 | | | | 0.46 | | | | 0.44 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.09 | | | | (0.07) | | | | 0.53 | | | | (0.20) | | | | 0.14 | |
| | | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.40 | | | | 0.26 | | | | 0.94 | | | | 0.26 | | | | 0.58 | |
| |
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.33) | | | | (0.37) | | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.42) | | | | (0.44) | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $7.31 | | | | $7.24 | | | | $7.35 | | | | $6.83 | | | | $6.99 | |
| | | | |
|
| |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 5.68% | | | | 3.74% | | | | 14.13% | | | | 3.68% | | | | 8.84% | |
|
| |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $1,231,057 | | | | $1,301,304 | | | | $1,375,239 | | | | $1,234,906 | | | | $1,311,700 | |
| |
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $1,231,693 | | | | $1,327,082 | | | | $1,289,508 | | | | $1,344,166 | | | | $1,337,849 | |
| |
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 4.29% | | | | 4.66% | | | | 5.80% | | | | 6.43% | | | | 6.49% | |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 1.46% | | | | 1.47% | | | | 1.49% | | | | 1.50% | | | | 1.47% | |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.15% | | | | 0.13% | | | | 0.09% | | | | 0.08% | | | | 0.09% | |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.08% | | | | 0.18% | | | | 0.17% | | | | 0.17% | | | | 0.25% | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 1.69% | | | | 1.78% | | | | 1.75% | | | | 1.75% | | | | 1.81% | |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 1.69% | | | | 1.78% | | | | 1.75% | | | | 1.75% | | | | 1.81%5 | |
| |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 34% | | | | 29% | | | | 20% | | | | 16% | | | | 16% | |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
5. Waiver was less than 0.005%.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
71 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Continued
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2016 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2015 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2014 | |
| |
Per Share Operating Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | | | $7.26 | | | | $7.37 | | | | $6.85 | | | | $7.00 | | | | $6.86 | |
| |
Income (loss) from investment operations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income1 | | | 0.38 | | | | 0.39 | | | | 0.47 | | | | 0.52 | | | | 0.50 | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.08 | | | | (0.06) | | | | 0.53 | | | | (0.18) | | | | 0.14 | |
| | | | |
Total from investment operations | | | 0.46 | | | | 0.33 | | | | 1.00 | | | | 0.34 | | | | 0.64 | |
| |
Dividends and/or distributions to shareholders: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dividends from net investment income | | | (0.39) | | | | (0.44) | | | | (0.48) | | | | (0.49) | | | | (0.50) | |
| |
Net asset value, end of period | | | $7.33 | | | | $7.26 | | | | $7.37 | | | | $6.85 | | | | $7.00 | |
| | | | |
|
| |
Total Return, at Net Asset Value2 | | | 6.61% | | | | 4.66% | | | | 15.10% | | | | 4.61% | | | | 9.96% | |
|
| |
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net assets, end of period (in thousands) | | | $1,824,770 | | | | $1,334,351 | | | | $920,958 | | | | $692,717 | | | | $562,641 | |
| |
Average net assets (in thousands) | | | $1,381,976 | | | | $1,061,569 | | | | $804,978 | | | | $700,339 | | | | $501,364 | |
| |
Ratios to average net assets:3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | | 5.19% | | | | 5.40% | | | | 6.68% | | | | 7.33% | | | | 7.36% | |
Expenses excluding specific expenses listed below | | | 0.56% | | | | 0.57% | | | | 0.59% | | | | 0.59% | | | | 0.56% | |
Interest and fees from borrowings | | | 0.15% | | | | 0.13% | | | | 0.09% | | | | 0.08% | | | | 0.09% | |
Interest and fees on short-term floating rate notes issued4 | | | 0.08% | | | | 0.18% | | | | 0.17% | | | | 0.17% | | | | 0.25% | |
| | | | |
Total expenses | | | 0.79% | | | | 0.88% | | | | 0.85% | | | | 0.84% | | | | 0.90% | |
Expenses after payments, waivers and/or reimbursements and reduction to custodian expenses | | | 0.79% | | | | 0.88% | | | | 0.85% | | | | 0.84% | | | | 0.90% | |
| |
Portfolio turnover rate | | | 34% | | | | 29% | | | | 20% | | | | 16% | | | | 16% | |
1. Per share amounts calculated based on the average shares outstanding during the period.
2. Assumes an initial investment on the business day before the first day of the fiscal period, with all dividends and distributions reinvested in additional shares on the reinvestment date, and redemption at the net asset value calculated on the last business day of the fiscal period. Sales charges are not reflected in the total returns. Total returns are not annualized for periods less than one full year. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares.
3. Annualized for periods less than one full year.
4. Interest and fee expense relates to the Fund’s liability for short-term floating rate notes issued in conjunction with inverse floating rate security transactions.
See accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.
|
72 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS July 31, 2018
1. Organization
Oppenheimer Rochester High-Yield Municipal Fund (the “Fund”) is a separate series of Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust, a diversified, open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“1940 Act”), as amended. The Fund’s investment objective is to seek tax-free income. The Fund’s investment adviser is OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (“OFI Global” or the “Manager”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (“OFI” or the “Sub-Adviser”). The Manager has entered into a sub-advisory agreement with OFI.
The Fund offers Class A, Class C and Class Y shares, and previously offered Class B shares for new purchase through June 29, 2012. Subsequent to that date, no new purchases of Class B shares were permitted. Reinvestment of dividend and/or capital gain distributions and exchanges of Class B shares into and from other Oppenheimer funds were permitted through May 31, 2018. Effective June 1, 2018 (the “Conversion Date”), all Class B shares converted to Class A shares. Class A shares are sold at their offering price, which is normally net asset value plus a front-end sales charge. Class C shares are sold, and Class B shares were sold, without a front-end sales charge but may be subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”). Class Y shares are sold to certain institutional investors or intermediaries without either a front-end sales charge or a CDSC, however, the intermediaries may impose charges on their accountholders who beneficially own Class Y shares. All classes of shares have identical rights and voting privileges with respect to the Fund in general and exclusive voting rights on matters that affect that class alone. Earnings, net assets and net asset value per share may differ due to each class having its own expenses, such as transfer and shareholder servicing agent fees and shareholder communications, directly attributable to that class. Class A and C shares have, and Class B shares had, separate distribution and/or service plans under which they pay, and Class B shares paid, fees. Class I and Class Y shares do not pay such fees. Previously issued Class B shares automatically converted to Class A shares 72 months after the date of purchase.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed in the Fund’s preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Security Valuation. All investments in securities are recorded at their estimated fair value, as described in Note 3.
Allocation of Income, Expenses, Gains and Losses. Income, expenses (other than those attributable to a specific class), gains and losses are allocated on a daily basis to each class of shares based upon the relative proportion of net assets represented by such class. Operating expenses directly attributable to a specific class are charged against the operations of that class.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders. Dividends and distributions to
|
73 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
shareholders, which are determined in accordance with income tax regulations and may differ from U.S. GAAP, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions, if any, are declared daily and paid monthly. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid annually or at other times as determined necessary by the Manager.
Investment Income. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or upon ex-dividend notification in the case of certain foreign dividends where the ex-dividend date may have passed. Non-cash dividends included in dividend income, if any, are recorded at the fair value of the securities received. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends, if any, and capital gains taxes on foreign investments, if any, have been provided for in accordance with the Fund’s understanding of the applicable tax rules and regulations. Interest income, if any, is recognized on an accrual basis. Discount and premium, which are included in interest income on the Statement of Operations, are amortized or accreted daily.
Custodian Fees. “Custodian fees and expenses” in the Statement of Operations may include interest expense incurred by the Fund on any cash overdrafts of its custodian account during the period. Such cash overdrafts may result from the effects of failed trades in portfolio securities and from cash outflows resulting from unanticipated shareholder redemption activity. The Fund pays interest to its custodian on such cash overdraft at a rate equal to the Prime Rate plus 0.35%. The “Reduction to custodian expenses” line item, if applicable, represents earnings on cash balances maintained by the Fund during the period. Such interest expense and other custodian fees may be paid with these earnings.
Security Transactions. Security transactions are recorded on the trade date. Realized gains and losses on securities sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
Indemnifications. The Fund’s organizational documents provide current and former Trustees and officers with a limited indemnification against liabilities arising in connection with the performance of their duties to the Fund. In the normal course of business, the Fund may also enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would be dependent on future claims that may be made against the Fund. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
Federal Taxes. The Fund intends to comply with provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its investment company taxable income, including any net realized gain on investments not offset by capital loss carryforwards, if any, to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income or excise tax provision is required. The Fund files income tax returns in U.S. federal and applicable state jurisdictions. The statute of limitations on the Fund’s tax return filings generally remains open for the three preceding fiscal reporting period ends. The Fund has analyzed its tax positions for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2018, including open tax years, and does not believe there are any uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in the Fund’s financial statements.
|
74 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
The tax components of capital shown in the following table represent distribution requirements the Fund must satisfy under the income tax regulations, losses the Fund may be able to offset against income and gains realized in future years and unrealized appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Undistributed Net Investment Income | | Undistributed Long-Term Gain | | | Accumulated Loss Carryforward1,2,3,4
| | | Net Unrealized Depreciation Based on cost of Securities and Other Investments for Federal Income Tax Purposes | |
| |
$244,083,254 | | | $— | | | | $1,248,828,943 | | | | $605,261,686 | |
1. At period end, the Fund had $1,248,828,943 of net capital loss carryforward available to offset future realized capital gains, if any, and thereby reduce future taxable gain distributions. Details of the capital loss carryforwards are included in the table below. Capital loss carryovers with no expiration, if any, must be utilized prior to those with expiration dates.
| | | | |
Expiring | | | |
| |
2019 | | $ | 35,463,515 | |
No expiration | | | 1,213,365,428 | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 1,248,828,943 | |
| | | | |
2. During the reporting period, the Fund did not utilize any capital loss carryforward.
3. During the previous reporting period, the Fund did not utilize any capital loss carryforward.
4. During the reporting period, $915,944,693 of unused capital loss carryforward expired.
Net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) may differ for financial statement and tax purposes. The character of dividends and distributions made during the fiscal year from net investment income or net realized gains are determined in accordance with federal income tax requirements, which may differ from the character of net investment income or net realized gains presented in those financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Also, due to timing of dividends and distributions, the fiscal year in which amounts are distributed may differ from the fiscal year in which the income or net realized gain was recorded by the Fund.
Accordingly, the following amounts have been reclassified for the reporting period. Net assets of the Fund were unaffected by the reclassifications.
| | | | | | | | |
Reduction to Paid-in Capital | | Reduction to Accumulated Net Investment Income | | | Reduction to Accumulated Net Realized Loss on Investments | |
| |
$915,101,831 | | | $28,305,181 | | | | $943,407,012 | |
The tax character of distributions paid during the reporting periods:
|
75 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
2. Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | |
Distributions paid from: | | | | | | | | |
Exempt-interest dividends | | $ | 282,958,494 | | | $ | 312,380,979 | |
Ordinary income | | | 7,823,739 | | | | 7,682,374 | |
| | | | |
Total | | $ | 290,782,233 | | | $ | 320,063,353 | |
| | | | |
The aggregate cost of securities and other investments and the composition of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of securities and other investments for federal income tax purposes at period end are noted in the following table. The primary difference between book and tax appreciation or depreciation of securities and other investments, if applicable, is attributable to the tax deferral of losses or tax realization of financial statement unrealized gain or loss.
| | | | |
Federal tax cost of securities | | $ | 7,004,228,2231 | |
| | | | |
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 337,649,870 | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (942,911,556) | |
| | | | |
Net unrealized depreciation | | $ | (605,261,686) | |
| | | | |
1. The Federal tax cost of securities does not include cost of $672,456,106, which has otherwise been recognized for financial reporting purposes, related to bonds placed into trusts in conjunction with certain investment transactions. See the Inverse Floating Rate Securities note in Note 4.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncement. In March 2017, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), ASU 2017-08. This provides guidance related to the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Manager is evaluating the impacts of these changes on the financial statements.
3. Securities Valuation
The Fund calculates the net asset value of its shares as of 4:00 P.M. Eastern Time, on each day the New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”) is open for trading, except in the case of a scheduled early closing of the Exchange, in which case the Fund will calculate net asset value of the shares as of the scheduled early closing time of the Exchange.
The Fund’s Board has adopted procedures for the valuation of the Fund’s securities and has delegated the day-to-day responsibility for valuation determinations under those
|
76 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
procedures to the Manager. The Manager has established a Valuation Committee which is responsible for determining a fair valuation for any security for which market quotations are not readily available. The Valuation Committee’s fair valuation determinations are subject to review, approval and ratification by the Fund’s Board at least quarterly or more frequently, if necessary.
Valuation Methods and Inputs
Securities are valued primarily using unadjusted quoted market prices, when available, as supplied by third party pricing services or broker-dealers.
The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or the fair value of the types of securities described below:
Equity securities traded on a securities exchange (including exchange-traded derivatives other than futures and futures options) are valued based on the official closing price on the principal exchange on which the security is traded, as identified by the Manager, prior to the time when the Fund’s assets are valued. If the official closing price is unavailable, the security is valued at the last sale price on the principal exchange on which it is traded, or if no sales occurred, the security is valued at the mean between the quoted bid and asked prices. Over-the-counter equity securities are valued at the last published sale price, or if no sales occurred, at the mean between the quoted bid and asked prices. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the time when the Fund’s assets are valued.
Corporate and government debt securities (of U.S. or foreign issuers) and municipal debt securities, short-term notes, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, and asset-backed securities are valued at the mean between the bid and asked prices utilizing evaluated prices obtained from third party pricing services or broker-dealers who may use matrix pricing methods to determine the evaluated prices. Pricing services generally price debt securities assuming orderly transactions of an institutional “round lot” size, but some trades may occur in smaller, “odd lot” sizes, sometimes at lower prices than institutional round lot trades. Standard inputs generally considered by third-party pricing vendors include reported trade data, broker-dealer price quotations, benchmark yields, issuer spreads on comparable securities, the credit quality, yield, maturity, as well as other appropriate factors.
Loans are valued at the mean between the bid and asked prices utilizing evaluated prices obtained from third party pricing services or broker-dealers. Standard inputs generally considered by third-party pricing vendors include information obtained from market participants regarding broker-dealer price quotations.
Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or when a significant event has occurred that would materially affect the value of the security, are fair valued either (i) by a standardized fair valuation methodology applicable to the security type or the significant event as previously approved by the Valuation Committee and the Fund’s Board or (ii) as determined in good faith by the Manager’s Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee considers all relevant facts that are reasonably available, through either public information or information available to the Manager, when determining the fair value of a security. Those
|
77 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
standardized fair valuation methodologies include, but are not limited to, valuing securities at the last sale price or initially at cost and subsequently adjusting the value based on: changes in company specific fundamentals, changes in an appropriate securities index, or changes in the value of similar securities which may be further adjusted for any discounts related to security-specific resale restrictions. When possible, such methodologies use observable market inputs such as unadjusted quoted prices of similar securities, observable interest rates, currency rates and yield curves. The methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities nor can it be assured that the Fund can obtain the fair value assigned to a security if it were to sell the security.
To assess the continuing appropriateness of security valuations, the Manager regularly compares prior day prices and sale prices to the current day prices and challenges those prices exceeding certain tolerance levels with the third party pricing service or broker source. For those securities valued by fair valuations, whether through a standardized fair valuation methodology or a fair valuation determination, the Valuation Committee reviews and affirms the reasonableness of the valuations based on such methodologies and fair valuation determinations on a regular basis after considering all relevant information that is reasonably available.
Classifications
Each investment asset or liability of the Fund is assigned a level at measurement date based on the significance and source of the inputs to its valuation. Various data inputs may be used in determining the value of each of the Fund’s investments as of the reporting period end. These data inputs are categorized in the following hierarchy under applicable financial accounting standards:
1) Level 1-unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (including securities actively traded on a securities exchange)
2) Level 2-inputs other than unadjusted quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and market corroborated inputs such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.)
3) Level 3-significant unobservable inputs (including the Manager’s own judgments about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability).
The inputs used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities.
The table below categorizes amounts that are included in the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities at period end based on valuation input level:
|
78 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1— Unadjusted Quoted Prices | | | Level 2— Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | Level 3— Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | Value | |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alabama | | $ | — | | | $ | 270,712,107 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 270,712,107 | |
Alaska | | | — | | | | 19,028,049 | | | | 145,125 | | | | 19,173,174 | |
Arizona | | | — | | | | 88,599,222 | | | | 4,754,221 | | | | 93,353,443 | |
Arkansas | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,993,100 | | | | 3,993,100 | |
California | | | — | | | | 833,427,170 | | | | 13,813,520 | | | | 847,240,690 | |
Colorado | | | — | | | | 142,897,076 | | | | 8,032,350 | | | | 150,929,426 | |
Connecticut | | | — | | | | 64,295,101 | | | | — | | | | 64,295,101 | |
Delaware | | | — | | | | 7,417,261 | | | | — | | | | 7,417,261 | |
District of Columbia | | | — | | | | 177,791,747 | | | | — | | | | 177,791,747 | |
Florida | | | — | | | | 329,078,235 | | | | 148,705,486 | | | | 477,783,721 | |
Georgia | | | — | | | | 71,906,222 | | | | — | | | | 71,906,222 | |
Hawaii | | | — | | | | 2,015,192 | | | | — | | | | 2,015,192 | |
Idaho | | | — | | | | 1,102,008 | | | | — | | | | 1,102,008 | |
Illinois | | | — | | | | 392,983,860 | | | | 11,130,256 | | | | 404,114,116 | |
Indiana | | | — | | | | 102,023,562 | | | | 11 | | | | 102,023,573 | |
Iowa | | | — | | | | 3,628,267 | | | | 78,300 | | | | 3,706,567 | |
Kansas | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,905,874 | | | | 1,905,874 | |
Kentucky | | | — | | | | 23,698,087 | | | | — | | | | 23,698,087 | |
Louisiana | | | — | | | | 12,298,400 | | | | 336,000 | | | | 12,634,400 | |
Maine | | | — | | | | 28,279,983 | | | | — | | | | 28,279,983 | |
Maryland | | | — | | | | 42,198,364 | | | | 788,513 | | | | 42,986,877 | |
Massachusetts | | | — | | | | 64,725,587 | | | | — | | | | 64,725,587 | |
Michigan | | | — | | | | 151,740,285 | | | | — | | | | 151,740,285 | |
Minnesota | | | — | | | | 41,126,335 | | | | — | | | | 41,126,335 | |
Mississippi | | | — | | | | 23,667,254 | | | | — | | | | 23,667,254 | |
Missouri | | | — | | | | 45,965,644 | | | | 5,574,360 | | | | 51,540,004 | |
Montana | | | — | | | | — | | | | 771,550 | | | | 771,550 | |
Nebraska | | | — | | | | 35,241,174 | | | | — | | | | 35,241,174 | |
Nevada | | | — | | | | 37,296,961 | | | | — | | | | 37,296,961 | |
New Hampshire | | | — | | | | 8,428,456 | | | | — | | | | 8,428,456 | |
New Jersey | | | — | | | | 120,701,170 | | | | — | | | | 120,701,170 | |
New Mexico | | | — | | | | 11,130,474 | | | | — | | | | 11,130,474 | |
New York | | | — | | | | 1,024,288,342 | | | | — | | | | 1,024,288,342 | |
North Carolina | | | — | | | | 18,749,666 | | | | — | | | | 18,749,666 | |
Ohio | | | — | | | | 479,893,463 | | | | — | | | | 479,893,463 | |
Oklahoma | | | — | | | | 24,772,586 | | | | — | | | | 24,772,586 | |
Oregon | | | — | | | | 5,125,229 | | | | — | | | | 5,125,229 | |
Pennsylvania | | | — | | | | 220,861,074 | | | | 2,921,340 | | | | 223,782,414 | |
Rhode Island | | | — | | | | 7,963,200 | | | | — | | | | 7,963,200 | |
South Carolina | | | — | | | | 55,293,704 | | | | 11,868,631 | | | | 67,162,335 | |
Tennessee | | | — | | | | 31,695,374 | | | | — | | | | 31,695,374 | |
Texas | | | — | | | | 719,248,162 | | | | 6,437,258 | | | | 725,685,420 | |
Utah | | | — | | | | 22,704,390 | | | | — | | | | 22,704,390 | |
|
79 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1— Unadjusted Quoted Prices | | | Level 2— Other Significant Observable Inputs | | | Level 3— Significant Unobservable Inputs | | | Value | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Vermont | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,225,228 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 8,225,228 | |
Virginia | | | — | | | | 23,432,373 | | | | 3,881,048 | | | | 27,313,421 | |
Washington | | | — | | | | 128,812,557 | | | | — | | | | 128,812,557 | |
West Virginia | | | — | | | | 24,674,802 | | | | — | | | | 24,674,802 | |
Wisconsin | | | — | | | | 163,236,318 | | | | 41,200 | | | | 163,277,518 | |
U.S. Possessions | | | — | | | | 727,168,228 | | | | — | | | | 727,168,228 | |
Corporate Bonds and Notes | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,736,000 | | | | 4,736,000 | |
Corporate Loans | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,432,000 | | | | 1,432,000 | |
Common Stocks | | | 528,551 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 528,551 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 528,551 | | | $ | 6,839,547,949 | | | $ | 231,346,143 | | | $ | 7,071,422,643 | |
| | | | |
Forward currency exchange contracts and futures contracts, if any, are reported at their unrealized appreciation/depreciation at measurement date, which represents the change in the contract’s value from trade date. All additional assets and liabilities included in the above table are reported at their market value at measurement date.
The table below shows the transfers between Level 2 and Level 3. The Fund’s policy is to recognize transfers in and transfers out as of the beginning of the reporting period.
| | | | | | | | |
| | Transfers out of Level 2* | | | Transfers into Level 3* | |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | |
Arizona | | $ | (744,223) | | �� | $ | 744,223 | |
California | | | (21,375,636) | | | | 21,375,636 | |
Colorado | | | (4,047,087) | | | | 4,047,087 | |
Florida | | | (118,188,837) | | | | 118,188,837 | |
Illinois | | | (4,552,360) | | | | 4,552,360 | |
Indiana | | | (569,863) | | | | 569,863 | |
Kansas | | | (1,360,756) | | | | 1,360,756 | |
Louisiana | | | (119,784) | | | | 119,784 | |
Missouri | | | (9,245,414) | | | | 9,245,414 | |
Pennsylvania | | | (2,710,947) | | | | 2,710,947 | |
Texas | | | (7,607,493) | | | | 7,607,493 | |
Virginia | | | (4,793,520) | | | | 4,793,520 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | (175,315,920) | | | $ | 175,315,920 | |
| | | | |
* Transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 because of the lack of observable market data due to a decrease in market activity for these securities.
|
80 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
The following is a reconciliation of assets in which significant unobservable inputs (level 3) were used in determining fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Value as of July 31, 2017 | | | Realized gain (loss) | | | Change in unrealized appreciation/ depreciation | | | Accretion/ (amortization) of premium/ discounta | |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alaska | | | | | | $ | 198,875 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (54,427 | ) | | $ | 677 | |
Arizona | | | | | | | 4,102,307 | | | | (142,986 | ) | | | 1,849,514 | | | | (488) | |
Arkansas | | | | | | | 3,355,896 | | | | 47,757 | | | | 939,391 | | | | 1,461 | |
California | | | | | | | 20 | | | | — | | | | (7,562,136 | ) | | | — | |
Colorado | | | | | | | 3,623,602 | | | | 875,856 | | | | 1,596,165 | | | | 351,548 | |
Florida | | | | | | | 26,285,478 | | | | (10,186 | ) | | | 12,835,497 | | | | 7,589,656 | |
Illinois | | | | | | | 15,707,402 | | | | — | | | | 81,339 | | | | — | |
Indiana | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 168,013 | | | | (168,261) | |
Iowa | | | | | | | 107,300 | | | | — | | | | (29,000 | ) | | | — | |
Kansas | | | | | | | — | | | | 11,593 | | | | 850,225 | | | | (15,579) | |
Louisiana | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 216,216 | | | | — | |
Maryland | | | | | | | 807,409 | | | | 3,926 | | | | (129,868 | ) | | | 112,742 | |
Missouri | | | | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (2,921,703 | ) | | | (222,907) | |
Montana | | | | | | | 1,184,923 | | | | — | | | | (432,342 | ) | | | 107,661 | |
Ohio | | | | | | | 4 | | | | 15,107 | | | | — | | | | (2,742) | |
Pennsylvania | | | | | | | 4,346,107 | | | | (20,240,537 | ) | | | 20,570,959 | | | | — | |
South Carolina | | | | | | | 13,521,799 | | | | 43,667 | | | | (1,345,146 | ) | | | 7,311 | |
Texas | | | | | | | 458 | | | | — | | | | (1,170,693 | ) | | | — | |
Virginia | | | | | | | 6,676,524 | | | | (16,331,937 | ) | | | 18,122,073 | | | | 13,556 | |
Wisconsin | | | | | | | 37,800 | | | | — | | | | 3,400 | | | | — | |
Non-Convertible Corporate Bond and Note | | | | | | | 5,328,000 | | | | — | | | | (592,000 | ) | | | — | |
Corporate Loans | | | | | | | 1,790,000 | | | | — | | | | (358,000 | ) | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | |
Total Assets | | | | | | $ | 87,073,904 | | | $ | (35,727,740 | ) | | $ | 42,637,477 | | | $ | 7,774,635 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
a. Included in net investment income. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Transfers into Transfers out of | | | Value as of | |
| | Purchases | | | Sales | | | Level 3 | | | Level 3 | | | July 31, 2018 | |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alaska | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 145,125 | |
Arizona | | | — | | | | (1,798,349 | ) | | | 744,223 | | | | — | | | | 4,754,221 | |
Arkansas | | | — | | | | (351,405 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 3,993,100 | |
California | | | — | | | | — | | | | 21,375,636 | | | | — | | | | 13,813,520 | |
Colorado | | | — | | | | (2,461,908 | ) | | | 4,047,087 | | | | — | | | | 8,032,350 | |
Florida | | | 2,280,186 | | | | (18,463,982 | ) | | | 118,188,837 | | | | — | | | | 148,705,486 | |
Illinois | | | 4,155 | | | | (9,215,000 | ) | | | 4,552,360 | | | | — | | | | 11,130,256 | |
|
81 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Transfers into Transfers out of | | | Value as of | |
| | Purchases | | Sales | | | Level 3 | | | Level 3 | | | July 31, 2018 | |
Assets Table Continued | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Indiana | | $ | — | | | $ | (569,604 | ) | | $ | 569,863 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 11 | |
Iowa | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 78,300 | |
Kansas | | | — | | | | (301,121 | ) | | | 1,360,756 | | | | — | | | | 1,905,874 | |
Louisiana | | | — | | | | — | | | | 119,784 | | | | — | | | | 336,000 | |
Maryland | | | — | | | | (5,696 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 788,513 | |
Missouri | | | — | | | | (526,444 | ) | | | 9,245,414 | | | | — | | | | 5,574,360 | |
Montana | | | — | | | | (88,692 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 771,550 | |
Ohio | | | 3,825 | | | | (16,194 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | |
Pennsylvania | | | 230,825 | | | | (4,696,961 | ) | | | 2,710,947 | | | | — | | | | 2,921,340 | |
South Carolina | | | — | | | | (359,000 | ) | | | — | | | | — | | | | 11,868,631 | |
Texas | | | — | | | | — | | | | 7,607,493 | | | | — | | | | 6,437,258 | |
Virginia | | | — | | | | (9,392,688 | ) | | | 4,793,520 | | | | — | | | | 3,881,048 | |
Wisconsin | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 41,200 | |
Non-Convertible Corporate | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bond and Note | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 4,736,000 | |
Corporate Loans | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,432,000 | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 2,518,991 | | | $ | (48,247,044 | ) | | $ | 175,315,920 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 231,346,143 | |
| | | | |
The total change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation included in the Statement of Operations attributable to Level 3 investments still held at period end:
| | | | |
| | Change in unrealized appreciation/ depreciation | |
Assets Table | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | |
Alaska | | $ | (54,427) | |
Arizona | | | 1,849,514 | |
Arkansas | | | 939,391 | |
California | | | (7,562,136) | |
Colorado | | | 984,744 | |
Florida | | | 11,365,991 | |
Illinois | | | 89,343 | |
Indiana | | | 168,013 | |
Iowa | | | (29,000) | |
Kansas | | | 850,225 | |
Louisiana | | | 216,216 | |
Maryland | | | (129,868) | |
Missouri | | | (2,921,703) | |
Montana | | | (432,342) | |
Pennsylvania | | | (20,432) | |
South Carolina | | | (1,345,146) | |
|
82 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
| | | | |
| | Change in unrealized appreciation/ depreciation | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes (Continued) | | | | |
Texas | | $ | (1,170,693) | |
Virginia | | | (745,171) | |
Wisconsin | | | 3,400 | |
Corporate Bonds and Notes | | | (592,000) | |
Corporate Loans | | | (358,000) | |
| | | | |
Total Assets | | $ | 1,105,919 | |
| | | | |
The following table summarizes the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in determining fair value measurements for those investments classified as Level 3 at period end:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Value as of July 31, 2018 | | | Valuation Technique | | | Unobservable Input | | | Range of Unobservable Inputs | | | Unobservable Input Used | |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Alaska | | $ | 145,125 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Arizona | | | 4,754,221 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Arkansas | | | 3,993,100 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
California | | | 13,813,520 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Colorado | | | 8,032,350 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Florida | | | 148,705,486 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Illinois | | | 11,130,256 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Indiana | | | 11 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Iowa | | | 78,300 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Kansas | | | 1,905,874 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Louisiana | | | 336,000 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Maryland | | | 788,513 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Missouri | | | 5,574,360 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Montana | | | 771,550 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Pennsylvania | | | 2,921,340 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
South Carolina | | | 11,868,631 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Texas | | | 6,437,258 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Virginia | | | 3,881,048 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
Wisconsin | | | 41,200 | | | | Pricing service | | | | N/A | | | | N/A | | | | N/A (a) | |
| | | | | |
| Discount to expected recovery | | |
| Discounted rate Expected recovery | | | | N/A | | | | 20% (b) | |
Corporate Bond and Note | | | 4,736,000 | | | | proceeds | | | | proceeds | | | | N/A | | | | 100% of par | |
|
83 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
3. Securities Valuation (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Value as of July 31, 2018 | | | Valuation Technique | | | Unobservable Input | | | Range of Unobservable Inputs | | | Unobservable Input Used | |
Assets Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Investments, at Value (Continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Loans | | $ | 1,432,000 | | |
| Discount to Expected recovery proceeds | | |
| Discounted rate Expected recovery proceeds | | | | N/A $1.79 Million | | | | 20% $1.79 Million (c) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total | | $ | 231,346,143 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) Securities classified as Level 3 whose unadjusted values were provided by a pricing service and for which such inputs are unobservable. The Manager periodically reviews pricing vendor methodologies and inputs to confirm they are determined using unobservable inputs and have been appropriately classified. Such securities’ fair valuations could change significantly based on changes in unobservable inputs used by the pricing service.
(b) The Fund fair values certain corporate bonds at a discount to the expected recovery value to reflect uncertainty and illiquidity. The Manager monitors such investments for additional market information or the occurrence of a significant event which would warrant a re-evaluation of the security’s fair valuation. A significant increase (decrease) to the discount rate or a significant decrease (increase) to the expected recovery value will result in a significant decrease (increase) to the fair value of the investment.
(c) The Fund fair values certain corporate loans at a discount to the expected recovery proceeds to reflect uncertainty and illiquidity. The Manager monitors such investments for additional market information or the occurrence of a significant event which would warrant a re-evaluation of the security’s fair valuation. A significant increase (decrease) to the discount rate or a significant decrease (increase) to the expected recovery value will result in a significant decrease (increase) to the fair value of the investment.
4. Investments and Risks
Inverse Floating Rate Securities. The Fund invests in inverse floating rate securities that pay interest at a rate that varies inversely with short-term interest rates. Because inverse floating rate securities are leveraged instruments, the value of an inverse floating rate security will change more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and other market fluctuations than the market value of a conventional fixed-rate municipal security of similar maturity and credit quality, including the municipal bond underlying an inverse floating rate security.
An inverse floating rate security is created as part of a financial transaction referred to as a “tender option bond” transaction. In most cases, in a tender option bond transaction the Fund sells a fixed-rate municipal bond (the “underlying municipal bond”) to a trust (the “Trust”). The Trust then issues and sells short-term floating rate securities with a fixed principal amount representing a senior interest in the underlying municipal bond to third parties and a residual, subordinate interest in the underlying municipal bond (referred to as an “inverse floating rate security”) to the Fund. The interest rate on the short-term floating rate securities resets periodically, usually weekly, to a prevailing market rate and holders of these securities are granted the option to tender their securities back to the Trust for repurchase at their principal amount plus accrued interest thereon (the “purchase price”) periodically, usually daily or weekly. A remarketing agent for the Trust is required to attempt to re-sell any tendered
|
84 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
short-term floating rate securities to new investors for the purchase price. If the remarketing agent is unable to successfully re-sell the tendered short-term floating rate securities, a liquidity provider to the Trust must contribute cash to the Trust to ensure that the tendering holders receive the purchase price of their securities on the repurchase date.
Because holders of the short-term floating rate securities are granted the right to tender their securities to the Trust for repurchase at frequent intervals for the purchase price, with such payment effectively guaranteed by the liquidity provider, the securities generally bear short-term rates of interest commensurate with money market instruments. When interest is paid on the underlying municipal bond to the Trust, such proceeds are first used to pay the Trust’s administrative expenses and accrued interest to holders of the short-term floating rate securities, with any remaining amounts being paid to the Fund, as the holder of the inverse floating rate security. Accordingly, the amount of such interest on the underlying municipal bond paid to the Fund is inversely related to the rate of interest on the short-term floating rate securities. Additionally, because the principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities is fixed and is not adjusted in response to changes in the market value of the underlying municipal bond, any change in the market value of the underlying municipal bond is reflected entirely in a change to the value of the inverse floating rate security.
Typically, the terms of an inverse floating rate security grant certain rights to the Fund, as holder. For example, the Fund typically has the right upon request to require that the Trust compel a tender of the short-term floating rate securities to facilitate the Fund’s acquisition of the underlying municipal bond. Following such a request, the Fund pays the Trust the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities and a specified portion of any market value gain on the underlying municipal bond since its deposit into the Trust, which the Trust uses to redeem the short-term floating rate securities. The Trust then distributes the underlying municipal bond to the Fund. Through the exercise of this right, the Fund can voluntarily terminate or “collapse” the Trust, terminate its investment in the related inverse floating rate security and obtain the underlying municipal bond. Additionally, the Fund also typically has the right to exchange with the Trust (i) a principal amount of short-term floating rate securities held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of the inverse floating rate security or (ii) a principal amount of the inverse floating rate security held by the Fund for a corresponding additional principal amount of short-term floating rate securities (which are typically then sold to other investors). Through the exercise of this right, the Fund may increase (or decrease) the principal amount of short-term floating rate securities outstanding, thereby increasing (or decreasing) the amount of leverage provided by the short-term floating rate securities to the Fund’s investment exposure to the underlying municipal bond.
The Fund’s investments in inverse floating rate securities involve certain risks. As short-term interest rates rise, an inverse floating rate security produces less current income (and, in extreme cases, may pay no income) and as short-term interest rates fall, an inverse floating rate security produces more current income. Thus, if short-term interest rates rise after the issuance of the inverse floating rate security, any yield advantage is reduced or eliminated. All inverse floating rate securities entail some degree of leverage represented by the outstanding principal amount of the related short-term floating rate securities, relative to the par value
|
85 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
of the underlying municipal bond. The value of, and income earned on, an inverse floating rate security that has a higher degree of leverage will fluctuate more significantly in response to changes in interest rates and to changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond than that of an inverse floating rate security with a lower degree of leverage, and is more likely to be eliminated entirely under adverse market conditions. Changes in the value of an inverse floating rate security will also be more significant than changes in the market value of the related underlying municipal bond because the leverage provided by the related short-term floating rate securities increases the sensitivity of an inverse floating rate security to changes in interest rates and to the market value of the underlying municipal bond. An inverse floating rate security can be expected to underperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is decreasing (or is already small) or when long-term interest rates are rising, but can be expected to outperform fixed-rate municipal bonds when the difference between long-term and short-term interest rates is increasing (or is already large) or when long-term interest rates are falling. Additionally, a tender option bond transaction typically provides for the automatic termination or “collapse” of a Trust upon the occurrence of certain adverse events, usually referred to as “mandatory tender events” or “tender option termination events.” These events may include, among others, a credit ratings downgrade of the underlying municipal bond below a specified level, a decrease in the market value of the underlying municipal bond below a specified amount, a bankruptcy of the liquidity provider or the inability of the remarketing agent to re-sell to new investors short-term floating rate securities that have been tendered for repurchase by holders thereof. Following the occurrence of such an event, the underlying municipal bond is generally sold for current market value and the proceeds distributed to holders of the short-term floating rate securities and inverse floating rate security, with the holder of the inverse floating rate security (the Fund) generally receiving the proceeds of such sale only after the holders of the short-term floating rate securities have received proceeds equal to the purchase price of their securities (and the liquidity provider is generally required to contribute cash to the Trust only in an amount sufficient to ensure that the holders of the short-term floating rate securities receive the purchase price of their securities in connection with such termination of the Trust). Following the occurrence of such events, the Fund could potentially lose the entire amount of its investment in the inverse floating rate security.
Finally, the Fund may enter into shortfall/reimbursement agreements with the liquidity provider of certain tender option bond transactions in connection with certain inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund. These agreements commit the Fund to reimburse the liquidity provider to the extent that the liquidity provider must provide cash to a Trust, including following the termination of a Trust resulting from the occurrence of a “mandatory tender event.” In connection with the occurrence of such an event and the termination of the Trust triggered thereby, the shortfall/reimbursement agreement will make the Fund liable for the amount of the negative difference, if any, between the liquidation value of the underlying municipal bond and the purchase price of the short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Under the standard terms of a tender option bond transaction, absent such a shortfall/ reimbursement agreement, the Fund, as holder of the inverse floating rate security, would not
|
86 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
be required to make such a reimbursement payment to the liquidity provider. The Manager monitors the Fund’s potential exposure with respect to these agreements on a daily basis and intends to take action to terminate the Fund’s investment in related inverse floating rate securities, if it deems it appropriate to do so. At period end, the Fund’s maximum exposure under such agreements is estimated at $217,560,000.
When the Fund creates an inverse floating rate security in a tender option bond transaction by selling an underlying municipal bond to a Trust, the transaction is considered a secured borrowing for financial reporting purposes. As a result of such accounting treatment, the Fund includes the underlying municipal bond on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities (but does not separately include the related inverse floating rate security on either). The Fund also includes a liability on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities equal to the outstanding principal amount and accrued interest on the related short-term floating rate securities issued by the Trust. Interest on the underlying municipal bond is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations, while interest payable on the related short-term floating rate securities is recorded as interest expense. At period end, municipal bond holdings with a value of $1,026,915,695 shown on the Fund’s Statement of Investments are held by such Trusts and serve as the underlying municipal bonds for the related $683,925,000 in short-term floating rate securities issued and outstanding at that date.
At period end, the inverse floating rate securities associated with tender option bond transactions accounted for as secured borrowings were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| |
$ 2,490,000 | | Allen County, OH Hospital Facilities (Mercy Health) Tender Option Bond Series 2015 XF-0235 Trust | | | 12.534% | | | | 6/1/38 | | | $ | 3,068,676 | |
5,000,000 | | CA GO Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF0579 Trust | | | 9.442 | | | | 11/1/35 | | | | 6,287,700 | |
6,040,000 | | CA GO Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF0579 Trust | | | 9.442 | | | | 11/1/34 | | | | 7,775,654 | |
4,195,000 | | CA GO Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF0600 Trust | | | 9.349 | | | | 11/1/33 | | | | 5,526,619 | |
3,750,000 | | CA Health Facilities Financing Authority (PSJH/ PH&S/PH&SW/PHSSC/LCMAS/PSJHCtr/PSJMC/ PH&SO/PH&SWW/SHlthS/SE/PacMedC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2016-XF0330 Trust | | | 18.413 | | | | 7/1/39 | | | | 4,337,437 | |
3,855,000 | | CA Health Facilities Financing Authority Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2104 Trust3 | | | 15.189 | | | | 7/1/39 | | | | 4,441,885 | |
5,000,000 | | CA Infrastructure and Economic Devel. (Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine) Tender Option Bond Series 2016-XF0335 Trust | | | 7.182 | | | | 5/15/40 | | | | 5,631,700 | |
8,640,000 | | CA State University Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF0554 Trust | | | 9.983 | | | | 11/1/47 | | | | 12,472,272 | |
6,875,000 | | Clark County, NV GO (Stadium Improvements) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2580 Trust | | | 12.896 | | | | 5/1/48 | | | | 10,910,969 | |
|
87 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| |
$ 7,175,000 | | CO Health Facilities Authority (Sisters of Charity of Leavenworth Health System) Tender Option Bond Series 2015 XF0239 Trust | | | 7.111% | | | | 7/1/36 | | | $ | 8,423,665 | |
8,745,000 | | Denton, TX Independent School District Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0648 Trust | | | 12.942 | | | | 8/15/45 | | | | 12,957,029 | |
2,525,000 | | Detroit, MI City School District Tender Option Bond Series 2015 XF-0241 Trust3 | | | 15.532 | | | | 11/1/23 | | | | 4,380,420 | |
4,675,000 | | Douglas County, NE Hospital Authority Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2132 Trust3 | | | 16.313 | | | | 11/1/48 | | | | 4,817,494 | |
4,570,000 | | Fremont, CA Union High School District Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0647 Trust | | | 9.565 | | | | 8/1/43 | | | | 5,118,994 | |
7,280,000 | | Fulton County, GA Devel. Authority (PHC/FCommH/PHosp/PMSH/PNH/ PMCC/PClinic/PHlthCF/PHI/PHIP/PHHosp Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0024 Trust | | | 12.480 | | | | 6/15/29 | | | | 8,149,305 | |
3,465,000 | | Fulton County, GA Devel. Authority (PHC/FCommH/PHosp/PMSH/PNH/ PMCC/PClinic/PHlthCF/PHI/PHIP/PHHosp Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0024-2 Trust | | | 13.260 | | | | 6/15/37 | | | | 3,904,466 | |
680,000 | | Fulton County, GA Devel. Authority (PHC/FCommH/PHosp/PMSH/PNH/ PMCC/PClinic/PHlthCF/PHI/PHIP/PHHosp Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0024-3 Trust | | | 13.170 | | | | 6/15/29 | | | | 766,258 | |
2,875,000 | | Geisinger, PA Authority (Geisinger Health System) Tender Option Bond Series 2015 XF-0040 Trust | | | 13.370 | | | | 6/1/39 | | | | 3,216,550 | |
5,000,000 | | Grand Parkway, TX Transportation Corp. Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2034 Trust3 | | | 7.075 | | | | 4/1/53 | | | | 5,937,000 | |
5,000,000 | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0023 Trust | | | 14.240 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 5,514,700 | |
4,345,000 | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0023-2 Trust | | | 13.800 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 4,777,545 | |
2,750,000 | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0023-3 Trust | | | 13.800 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 3,023,845 | |
2,500,000 | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0023-4 Trust | | | 13.800 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 2,748,950 | |
2,200,000 | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0023-5 Trust | | | 13.800 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 2,419,494 | |
1,250,000 | | IL Finance Authority (AHCN/ANSHN/ACMC/ AH&HC Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0023-6 Trust | | | 13.800 | | | | 4/1/44 | | | | 1,378,875 | |
|
88 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value | |
| |
$ 3,125,000 | | IL Finance Authority (CDHS/CDHA Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0025 Trust | | | 14.240% | | | | 11/1/39 | | | $ | 3,707,969 | |
1,250,000 | | IL Finance Authority (CDHS/CDHA Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0025-2 Trust | | | 13.800 | | | | 11/1/39 | | | | 1,475,500 | |
3,140,000 | | Lancaster County, SC School District Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2528 Trust3 | | | 9.121 | | | | 3/1/36 | | | | 3,686,768 | |
1,250,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Water & Power Tender Option Bond Series 2015 XF-0039 Trust | | | 12.590 | | | | 7/1/34 | | | | 1,323,037 | |
7,000,000 | | Los Angeles, CA Dept. of Water & Power Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF0556 Trust | | | 9.983 | | | | 7/1/35 | | | | 10,544,310 | |
3,540,000 | | MA HFA Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2150 Trust3 | | | 7.717 | | | | 12/1/42 | | | | 3,618,694 | |
6,490,000 | | MD Stadium Authority (Construction & Revitalization Program) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2581 Trust | | | 12.893 | | | | 5/1/47 | | | | 10,207,018 | |
2,500,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2117 Trust3 | | | 13.306 | | | | 2/1/27 | | | | 2,685,350 | |
2,500,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2117-2 Trust3 | | | 12.440 | | | | 2/1/27 | | | | 2,668,600 | |
12,500,000 | | Miami-Dade County, FL School Board Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2117-3 Trust3 | | | 13.739 | | | | 2/1/34 | | | | 13,438,500 | |
2,500,000 | | Montgomery County, OH (Miami Valley Hospital) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0029 Trust | | | 14.740 | | | | 11/15/23 | | | | 3,323,100 | |
1,000,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Princeton University) Tender Option Bond Series 2017- XF0601 Trust | | | 9.318 | | | | 7/1/39 | | | | 1,275,080 | |
1,995,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Princeton University) Tender Option Bond Series 2017- XF0601 Trust | | | 9.314 | | | | 7/1/38 | | | | 2,563,056 | |
1,380,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Princeton University) Tender Option Bond Series 2017- XF0601 Trust | | | 9.311 | | | | 7/1/37 | | | | 1,786,300 | |
1,250,000 | | NJ Educational Facilities Authority (Princeton University) Tender Option Bond Series 2017- XF0601 Trust | | | 9.318 | | | | 7/1/40 | | | | 1,589,838 | |
9,500,000 | | North Central TX HFDC (CMCD/CMCtrF Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0034 Trust | | | 15.325 | | | | 8/15/39 | | | | 11,083,555 | |
25,000,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2015 XF-2472 Trust3 | | | 9.940 | | | | 5/1/42 | | | | 35,287,000 | |
3,750,000 | | NYC Transitional Finance Authority (Future Tax) Tender Option Bond Series 2018 XF-2529 Trust | | | 9.031 | | | | 8/1/41 | | | | 4,332,638 | |
3,335,000 | | NYS DA (State Personal Income Tax Authority) Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF0555 Trust | | | 9.939 | | | | 2/15/37 | | | | 4,707,753 | |
18,695,000 | | NYS Liberty Devel. Corp. Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2146 Trust3 | | | 7.355 | | | | 1/15/44 | | | | 20,294,918 | |
|
89 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Principal Amount | | Inverse Floater1 | | Coupon Rate2 | | | Maturity Date | | | Value |
| |
$ 2,760,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 200th Series Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF2487 Trust | | | 12.820% | | | | 4/15/57 | | | $ | 4,170,443 | |
3,250,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 205th Series Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF2489 Trust | | | 12.810 | | | | 5/15/57 | | | | 5,004,610 | |
2,500,000 | | Port Authority NY/NJ, 206th Series Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF2488 Trust | | | 12.690 | | | | 11/15/47 | | | | 3,705,225 | |
6,755,000 | | Riverside County, CA Transportation Commission Tender Option Bond Series 2017-XF2520 Trust | | | 9.152 | | | | 6/1/36 | | | | 8,306,624 | |
3,980,000 | | Santa Clara County, CA GO Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF0646 Trust | | | 9.567 | | | | 8/1/40 | | | | 4,518,295 | |
3,500,000 | | South Miami, FL Health Facilities Authority (BHSF/BHM/HHI/SMH/MarH/DrsH/WKBP/ BOS/FHlth/BHlth/BethH Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2018-XF2530 Trust | | | 9.049 | | | | 8/15/36 | | | | 3,871,070 | |
1,985,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Tender Option Bond Series 2015- XF2057 Trust3 | | | 14.581 | | | | 11/15/24 | | | | 2,093,659 | |
8,150,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp. Tender Option Bond Series 2015- XF2057-2 Trust3 | | | 16.322 | | | | 11/15/29 | | | | 8,554,892 | |
6,750,000 | | Tarrant County, TX Health Facilities Devel. Corp. (CCMCtr/CCHCS/CCPN/WICF Obligated Group) Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0028 Trust | | | 7.030 | | | | 12/1/33 | | | | 7,362,630 | |
375,000 | | Tes Properties, WA Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0038 Trust | | | 14.090 | | | | 12/1/29 | | | | 423,427 | |
3,000,000 | | Tes Properties, WA Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF0038-2 Trust | | | 14.520 | | | | 12/1/38 | | | | 3,393,270 | |
8,705,000 | | WA Health Care Facilities Authority (Peacehealth) Tender Option Bond Series 2015 XF-0042 Trust | | | 6.830 | | | | 11/1/28 | | | | 9,314,176 | |
4,520,000 | | WA Health Care Facilities Authority Tender Option Bond Series 2015-XF2035 Trust3 | | | 16.241 | | | | 10/1/36 | | | | 4,685,888 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 342,990,695 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. For a list of abbreviations used in the Inverse Floater table see the Portfolio Abbreviations table at the end of the Statement of Investments.
2. Represents the current interest rate for the inverse floating rate security.
3. Represents an inverse floating rate security that is subject to a shortfall/reimbursement agreement.
The Fund may also purchase an inverse floating rate security created as part of a tender option bond transaction not initiated by the Fund when a third party, such as a municipal issuer or financial institution, transfers an underlying municipal bond to a Trust. For financial reporting purposes, the Fund includes the inverse floating rate security related to such transaction on its Statement of Investments and as an asset on its Statement of Assets and Liabilities, and interest on the security is recorded as investment income on the Fund’s Statement of Operations.
The Fund may invest in inverse floating rate securities with any degree of leverage (as measured by the outstanding principal amount of related short-term floating rate securities).
|
90 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
However, the Fund may only expose up to 35% of its total assets to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities. This limitation is measured by comparing the aggregate principal amount of the short-term floating rate securities that are related to the inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund to the total assets of the Fund. The Fund’s exposure to the effects of leverage from its investments in inverse floating rate securities amounts to $683,925,000 or 9.44% of its total assets at period end.
Loans. The Fund invests in loans made to U.S. and foreign borrowers that are corporations, partnerships or other business entities. The Fund will do so directly as an original lender or by assignment or indirectly through participation agreements or certain derivative instruments. While many of these loans will be collateralized, the Fund can also invest in uncollateralized loans. Loans are often issued in connection with recapitalizations, acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, and refinancing of borrowers. The loans often pay interest at rates that float above (or are adjusted periodically based on) a benchmark that reflects current interest rates although the Fund can also invest in loans with fixed interest rates.
When investing in loans, the Fund generally will have a contractual relationship only with the lender, not with the relevant borrower. As a result, the Fund generally will have the right to receive payments of principal, interest, and any fees to which it is entitled only from the lender selling the participation and only upon receipt by the lender of the payments from the relevant borrower. The Fund may not directly benefit from the collateral supporting the debt obligation in which it has purchased the participation. As a result, the Fund will assume the credit risk of both the borrower and the institution selling the participation to the Fund.
Securities on a When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis. The Fund may purchase securities on a “when-issued” basis, and may purchase or sell securities on a “delayed delivery” basis. “When-issued” or “delayed delivery” refers to securities whose terms and indenture are available and for which a market exists, but which are not available for immediate delivery. Delivery and payment for securities that have been purchased by the Fund on a when-issued basis normally takes place within six months and possibly as long as two years or more after the trade date. During this period, such securities do not earn interest, are subject to market fluctuation and may increase or decrease in value prior to their delivery. The purchase of securities on a when-issued basis may increase the volatility of the Fund’s net asset value to the extent the Fund executes such transactions while remaining substantially fully invested. When the Fund engages in when-issued or delayed delivery transactions, it relies on the buyer or seller, as the case may be, to complete the transaction. Their failure to do so may cause the Fund to lose the opportunity to obtain or dispose of the security at a price and yield it considers advantageous. The Fund may also sell securities that it purchased on a when-issued basis or forward commitment prior to settlement of the original purchase.
At period end, the Fund had purchased securities issued on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis and sold securities issued on a delayed delivery basis as follows:
|
91 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
| | | | |
| | When-Issued or Delayed Delivery Basis Transactions | |
| |
Purchased securities | | | $109,854,663 | |
Sold securities | | | 92,380,247 | |
Equity Security Risk. Stocks and other equity securities fluctuate in price. The value of the Fund’s portfolio may be affected by changes in the equity markets generally. Equity markets may experience significant short-term volatility and may fall sharply at times. Different markets may behave differently from each other and U.S. equity markets may move in the opposite direction from one or more foreign stock markets. Adverse events in any part of the equity or fixed-income markets may have unexpected negative effects on other market segments.
The prices of individual equity securities generally do not all move in the same direction at the same time and a variety of factors can affect the price of a particular company’s securities. These factors may include, but are not limited to, poor earnings reports, a loss of customers, litigation against the company, general unfavorable performance of the company’s sector or industry, or changes in government regulations affecting the company or its industry.
Credit Risk. The Fund invests in high-yield, non-investment-grade bonds, which may be subject to a greater degree of credit risk. Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer to meet interest or principal payments or both as they become due. The Fund may acquire securities that have missed an interest payment, and is not obligated to dispose of securities whose issuers or underlying obligors subsequently miss an interest and/or principal payment.
In June 2016, Congress passed the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”). PROMESA established a federally-appointed fiscal oversight board (the “Oversight Board”) to oversee Puerto Rico’s financial operations and allows the Oversight Board to file cases on behalf of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or one of its instrumentalities to restructure debt and other obligations of the relevant entity in a “Title III” proceeding. Title III incorporates many provisions of the federal Bankruptcy Code for U.S. territories, and incorporates legal mechanisms for a litigation stay and restructuring of pension and debt obligations, among other provisions. In early May 2017, Title III petitions were filed for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (“COFINA”), two of the largest issuers of Puerto Rico debt. Title III petitions for Puerto Rico Highways & Transportation Authority (“PRHTA”) and Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) were subsequently filed in mid-May and early July, respectively. Title III petitions for additional Puerto Rican instrumentalities may be filed. These restructuring proceedings create uncertainty as to the treatment of claims of varying degrees of seniority and the levels and priorities of payment from the affected entities.
Information concerning securities not accruing interest at period end is as follows:
| | | | |
Cost | | $ | 1,122,066,893 | |
Market Value | | | $644,434,735 | |
Market Value as % of Net Assets | | | 10.36% | |
|
92 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
4. Investments and Risks (Continued)
Concentration Risk. The Fund invests a large percentage of its total assets in obligations of issuers within its respective state and U.S. territories. Risks may arise from geographic concentration in any state, commonwealth or territory, such as Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Guam or the Northern Mariana Islands. Certain economic, regulatory or political developments occurring in the state, commonwealth or territory such as ongoing developments in Puerto Rico may impair the ability of certain issuers of municipal securities to pay principal and interest on their obligations.
5. Market Risk Factors
The Fund’s investments in securities and/or financial derivatives may expose the Fund to various market risk factors: Commodity Risk. Commodity risk relates to the change in value of commodities or commodity indexes as they relate to increases or decreases in the commodities market. Commodities are physical assets that have tangible properties. Examples of these types of assets are crude oil, heating oil, metals, livestock, and agricultural products.
Credit Risk. Credit risk relates to the ability of the issuer of debt to meet interest and principal payments, or both, as they come due. In general, lower-grade, higher-yield debt securities are subject to credit risk to a greater extent than lower-yield, higher-quality securities.
Equity Risk. Equity risk relates to the change in value of equity securities as they relate to increases or decreases in the general market.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk. Foreign exchange rate risk relates to the change in the U.S. dollar value of a security held that is denominated in a foreign currency. The U.S. dollar value of a foreign currency denominated security will decrease as the dollar appreciates against the currency, while the U.S. dollar value will increase as the dollar depreciates against the currency.
Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk refers to the fluctuations in value of fixed-income securities resulting from the inverse relationship between price and yield. For example, an increase in general interest rates will tend to reduce the market value of already issued fixed-income investments, and a decline in general interest rates will tend to increase their value. In addition, debt securities with longer maturities, which tend to have higher yields, are subject to potentially greater fluctuations in value from changes in interest rates than obligations with shorter maturities.
Volatility Risk. Volatility risk refers to the magnitude of the movement, but not the direction of the movement, in a financial instrument’s price over a defined time period. Large increases or decreases in a financial instrument’s price over a relative time period typically indicate greater volatility risk, while small increases or decreases in its price typically indicate lower volatility risk.
6. Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund has authorized an unlimited number of no par value shares of beneficial interest of
|
93 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
6. Shares of Beneficial Interest (Continued)
each class. Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended July 31, 2018 | | | Year Ended July 31, 2017 | |
| | Shares | | | Amount | | | Shares | | | Amount | |
Class A | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold1 | | | 98,331,285 | | | $ | 699,504,436 | | | | 115,327,306 | | | $ | 828,957,347 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 19,048,153 | | | | 135,863,268 | | | | 21,456,702 | | | | 154,850,971 | |
Redeemed | | | (124,100,367) | | | | (882,087,890) | | | | (138,859,277) | | | | (999,017,491) | |
Net decrease | | | (6,720,929) | | | $ | (46,720,186) | | | | (2,075,269) | | | $ | (15,209,173) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class B | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 15,892 | | | $ | 112,381 | | | | 33,669 | | | $ | 246,689 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 44,586 | | | | 317,880 | | | | 141,531 | | | | 1,026,583 | |
Redeemed1 | | | (2,148,003) | | | | (15,345,368) | | | | (2,256,625) | | | | (16,359,458) | |
Net decrease | | | (2,087,525) | | | $ | (14,915,107) | | | | (2,081,425) | | | $ | (15,086,186) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class C | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 24,981,691 | | | $ | 177,177,211 | | | | 31,846,432 | | | $ | 228,909,131 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 7,003,230 | | | | 49,723,326 | | | | 7,923,676 | | | | 56,947,446 | |
Redeemed | | | (43,327,687) | | | | (306,603,743) | | | | (47,160,297) | | | | (336,919,398) | |
Net decrease | | | (11,342,766) | | | $ | (79,703,206) | | | | (7,390,189) | | | $ | (51,062,821) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Class Y | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Sold | | | 144,887,702 | | | $ | 1,035,490,313 | | | | 110,295,897 | | | $ | 792,134,437 | |
Dividends and/or distributions reinvested | | | 9,090,124 | | | | 64,858,937 | | | | 7,331,489 | | | | 52,954,175 | |
Redeemed | | | (88,858,588) | | | | (629,749,148) | | | | (58,811,699) | | | | (420,286,987) | |
Net increase | | | 65,119,238 | | | $ | 470,600,102 | | | | 58,815,687 | | | $ | 424,801,625 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1. All outstanding Class B shares converted to Class A shares on June 1, 2018.
7. Purchases and Sales of Securities
The aggregate cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities, other than short-term obligations, for the reporting period were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Purchases | | | | | | Sales | |
| |
Investment securities | | $ | 2,611,680,723 | | | | | | | $ | 2,162,204,355 | |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Management Fees. Under the investment advisory agreement, the Fund pays the Manager a management fee based on the daily net assets of the Fund at an annual rate as shown in the following table:
|
94 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
| | | | |
Fee Schedule | | | |
Up to $200 million | | | 0.60% | |
Next $100 million | | | 0.55 | |
Next $200 million | | | 0.50 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.45 | |
Next $250 million | | | 0.40 | |
Next $10 billion | | | 0.35 | |
Over $11 billion | | | 0.34 | |
The Fund’s effective management fee for the reporting period was 0.37% of average annual net assets before any applicable waivers.
Sub-Adviser Fees. The Manager has retained the Sub-Adviser to provide the day-to-day portfolio management of the Fund. Under the Sub-Advisory Agreement, the Manager pays the Sub-Adviser an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the investment management fee collected by the Manager from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any investment management fee waivers. The fee paid to the Sub-Adviser is paid by the Manager, not by the Fund.
Transfer Agent Fees. OFI Global (the “Transfer Agent”) serves as the transfer and shareholder servicing agent for the Fund. The Fund pays the Transfer Agent a fee based on annual net assets, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. Fees incurred and average net assets for each class with respect to these services are detailed in the Statement of Operations and Financial Highlights, respectively.
Sub-Transfer Agent Fees. The Transfer Agent has retained Shareholder Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of OFI (the “Sub-Transfer Agent”), to provide the day-to-day transfer agent and shareholder servicing of the Fund. Under the Sub-Transfer Agency Agreement, the Transfer Agent pays the Sub-Transfer Agent an annual fee in monthly installments, equal to a percentage of the transfer agent fee collected by the Transfer Agent from the Fund, which shall be calculated after any applicable fee waivers. The fee paid to the Sub-Transfer Agent is paid by the Transfer Agent, not by the Fund.
Trustees’ Compensation. The Fund has adopted an unfunded retirement plan (the “Plan”) for the Fund’s Independent Trustees. Benefits are based on years of service and fees paid to each Trustee during their period of service. The Plan was frozen with respect to adding new participants effective December 31, 2006 (the “Freeze Date”) and existing Plan Participants as of the Freeze Date will continue to receive accrued benefits under the Plan. Active Independent Trustees as of the Freeze Date have each elected a distribution method with respect to their benefits under the Plan.
During the reporting period, the Fund’s projected benefit obligations, payments to retired Trustees and accumulated liability were as follows:
|
95 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
| | | | |
Projected Benefit Obligations Increased | | $ | — | |
Payments Made to Retired Trustees | | | 27,345 | |
Accumulated Liability as of July 31, 2018 | | | 235,805 | |
The Fund’s Board of Trustees (“Board”) has adopted a compensation deferral plan for Independent Trustees that enables Trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from the Fund. For purposes of determining the amount owed to the Trustee under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of the Fund or in other Oppenheimer funds selected by the Trustee. The Fund purchases shares of the funds selected for deferral by the Trustee in amounts equal to his or her deemed investment, resulting in a Fund asset equal to the deferred compensation liability. Such assets are included as a component of “Other” within the asset section of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Deferral of Trustees’ fees under the plan will not affect the net assets of the Fund and will not materially affect the Fund’s assets, liabilities or net investment income per share. Amounts will be deferred until distributed in accordance with the compensation deferral plan.
Distribution and Service Plan (12b-1) Fees. Under its General Distributor’s Agreement with the Fund, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (the “Distributor”) acts as the Fund’s principal underwriter in the continuous public offering of the Fund’s classes of shares.
Service Plan for Class A Shares. The Fund has adopted a Service Plan (the “Plan”) for Class A shares pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. Under the Plan, the Fund reimburses the Distributor for a portion of its costs incurred for services provided to accounts that hold Class A shares. Reimbursement is made periodically at an annual rate of up to
0.25% of the daily net assets of Class A shares of the Fund. The Distributor currently uses all of those fees to pay dealers, brokers, banks and other financial institutions periodically for providing personal service and maintenance of accounts of their customers that hold Class A shares. Any unreimbursed expenses the Distributor incurs with respect to Class A shares in any fiscal year cannot be recovered in subsequent periods. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plan are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Distribution and Service Plans for Class B and Class C Shares. The Fund has adopted Distribution and Service Plans (the “Plans”) for Class C shares, and had previously adopted a similar plan for Class B shares, pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act to compensate the Distributor for distributing those share classes, maintaining accounts and providing shareholder services. Under the Plans, the Fund pays the Distributor an annual asset-based sales charge of 0.75% on Class C shares’ daily net assets. The Fund paid the Distributor an annual asset-based sales charge of 0.75% on Class B shares prior to their Conversion Date. The Fund also pays a service fee under the Plans at an annual rate of 0.15% of daily net assets and previously paid this fee for Class B prior to their Conversion Date. The Plans continue in effect from year to year only if the Fund’s Board of Trustees votes annually to
|
96 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
8. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates (Continued)
approve their continuance at an in person meeting called for that purpose. Fees incurred by the Fund under the Plans are detailed in the Statement of Operations.
Sales Charges. Front-end sales charges and CDSC do not represent expenses of the Fund. They are deducted from the proceeds of sales of Fund shares prior to investment or from redemption proceeds prior to remittance, as applicable. The sales charges retained by the Distributor from the sale of shares and the CDSC retained by the Distributor on the redemption of shares is shown in the following table for the period indicated.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended | | Class A Front-End Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class A Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | | | Class B Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor1 | | | Class C Contingent Deferred Sales Charges Retained by Distributor | |
| |
July 31, 2018 | | | $468,971 | | | | $196,610 | | | | $6,975 | | | | $135,196 | |
1. All outstanding Class B shares converted to Class A shares on June 1, 2018.
9. Borrowings and Other Financing
Borrowings. The Fund can borrow money from banks in amounts up to one third of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less all liabilities and indebtedness other than borrowings (meaning that the value of those assets must be at least 300% of the amount borrowed). The Fund can use those borrowings for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities. The Fund also may borrow to meet redemption obligations or for temporary and emergency purposes. When the Fund invests borrowed money in portfolio securities, it is using a speculative investment technique known as leverage and changes in the value of the Fund’s investments will have a larger effect on its share price than if it did not borrow because of the effect of leverage.
The Fund can also use the borrowings for other investment-related purposes, including in connection with the Fund’s inverse floater investments as discussed in Note 4. The Fund may use the borrowings to reduce the leverage amount of, or unwind or “collapse” trusts that issued “inverse floaters” owned by the Fund, or in circumstances in which the Fund has entered into a shortfall and forbearance agreement with the sponsor of the inverse floater trust to meet the Fund’s obligation to reimburse the sponsor of the inverse floater for the difference between the liquidation value of the underlying bond and the amount due to holders of the short-term floating rate notes issued by the Trust. See the discussion in Note 4 (Inverse Floating Rate Securities) for additional information.
The Fund will pay interest and may pay other fees in connection with loans. If the Fund does borrow, it will be subject to greater expenses than funds that do not borrow. The interest on borrowed money and the other fees incurred in conjunction with loans are an expense that might reduce the Fund’s yield and return. Expenses incurred by the Fund with respect to interest on borrowings and commitment fees are disclosed separately or as other expenses on the Statement of Operations.
|
97 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Continued
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
The Fund entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement (the “Agreement”) with conduit lenders and Citibank N.A. which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed, secured borrowing facility that permits borrowings of up to $2.5 billion, collectively, by the Oppenheimer Rochester Funds. To secure the loan, the Fund pledges investment securities in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Securities held in collateralized accounts to cover these borrowings are noted in the Statement of Investments. Interest is charged to the Fund, based on its borrowings, at current commercial paper issuance rates (2.1405% at period end). The Fund pays additional fees monthly to its lender on its outstanding borrowings to manage and administer the facility and is allocated its pro-rata share of an annual structuring fee and ongoing commitment fees both of which are based on the total facility size. Total fees and interest that are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations related to its participation in the borrowing facility during the reporting period equal 0.11% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis. The Fund has the right to prepay such loans and terminate its participation in the conduit loan facility at any time upon prior notice.
At period end, the Fund had borrowings outstanding at an interest rate of 2.1405%.
Details of the borrowings for the reporting period are as follows:
| | | | |
Average Daily Loan Balance | | $ | 76,417,260 | |
Average Daily Interest Rate | | | 1.604% | |
Fees Paid | | $ | 4,967,454 | |
Interest Paid | | $ | 1,293,656 | |
Reverse Repurchase Agreements. The Fund may engage in reverse repurchase agreements. A reverse repurchase agreement is the sale of one or more securities to a counterparty at an agreed-upon purchase price with the simultaneous agreement to repurchase those securities on a future date at a higher repurchase price. The repurchase price represents the repayment of the purchase price and interest accrued thereon over the term of the repurchase agreement. The cash received by the Fund in connection with a reverse repurchase agreement may be used for investment-related purposes such as purchasing portfolio securities or for other purposes such as those described in the preceding “Borrowings” note.
The Fund entered into a Committed Repurchase Transaction Facility (the “Facility”) with J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (the “counterparty”) which enables it to participate with certain other Oppenheimer funds in a committed reverse repurchase agreement facility that permits aggregate outstanding reverse repurchase agreements of up to $750 million, collectively. Interest is charged to the Fund on the purchase price of outstanding reverse repurchase agreements at current LIBOR rates plus an applicable spread. The Fund is also allocated its pro-rata share of an annual structuring fee based on the total Facility size and ongoing commitment fees based on the total unused amount of the Facility. The Fund retains the economic exposure to fluctuations in the value of securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility and therefore these transactions are considered secured borrowings for financial reporting purposes. The Fund also continues to receive the economic
|
98 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
9. Borrowings and Other Financing (Continued)
benefit of interest payments received on securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements, in the form of a direct payment from the counterparty. These payments are included in interest income on the Statement of Operations. Total fees and interest related to the Fund’s participation in the Facility during the reporting period are included in expenses on the Fund’s Statement of Operations and equal 0.04% of the Fund’s average net assets on an annualized basis.
The securities subject to reverse repurchase agreements under the Facility are valued on a daily basis. To the extent this value, after adjusting for certain margin requirements of the Facility, exceeds the cash proceeds received, the Fund may request the counterparty to return securities equal in margin value to this excess. To the extent that the cash proceeds received exceed the margin value of the securities subject to the transaction, the counterparty may request additional securities from the Fund. The Fund has the right to declare each Wednesday as the repurchase date for any outstanding reverse repurchase agreement upon delivery of advanced notification and may also recall any security subject to such a transaction by substituting eligible securities of equal or greater margin value according to the Facility’s terms.
Details of reverse repurchase agreement transactions for the reporting period are as follows:
| | | | |
Fees Paid | | $ | 2,283,978 | |
Interest Paid | | $ | 3,389 | |
|
99 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees
Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Oppenheimer Rochester High Yield Municipal Fund (the “Fund”), a separate series of Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust, including the statement of investments, as of July 31, 2018, the related statements of operations and cash flows for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two year period then ended, and the related notes (collectively, the “financial statements”) and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five year period then ended. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Fund as of July 31, 2018, the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Fund in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements and financial highlights, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and financial highlights. Such procedures also included confirmation of securities owned as of July 31, 2018, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, or by other appropriate auditing procedures. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and financial highlights. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
KPMG LLP
We have not been able to determine the specific year that we began serving as the auditor of one or more Oppenheimer Funds investment companies, however we are aware that we have served as the auditor of one or more Oppenheimer Funds investment companies since at least 1969.
Denver, Colorado
September 27, 2018
|
100 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
FEDERAL INCOME TAX INFORMATION Unaudited
In early 2018, if applicable, shareholders of record received information regarding all dividends and distributions paid to them by the Fund during calendar year 2017.
None of the dividends paid by the Fund during the reporting period are eligible for the corporate dividend-received deduction. 94.61% of the dividends were derived from interest on municipal bonds and are not subject to federal income taxes. To the extent a shareholder is subject to any state or local tax laws, some or all of the dividends received may be taxable.
The foregoing information is presented to assist shareholders in reporting distributions received from the Fund to the Internal Revenue Service. Because of the complexity of the federal regulations which may affect your individual tax return and the many variations in state and local tax regulations, we recommend that you consult your tax advisor for specific guidance.
|
101 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
PORTFOLIO PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND GUIDELINES;
UPDATES TO STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS Unaudited
The Fund has adopted Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines under which the Fund votes proxies relating to securities (“portfolio proxies”) held by the Fund. A description of the Fund’s Portfolio Proxy Voting Policies and Guidelines is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), (ii) on the Fund’s website at www.oppenheimerfunds.com, and (iii) on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the Fund is required to file Form N-PX, with its complete proxy voting record for the 12 months ended June 30th, no later than August 31st of each year. The Fund’s voting record is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling the Fund toll-free at 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677), and (ii) in the Form N-PX filing on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first quarter and the third quarter of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund’s Form N-Q filings are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Those forms may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
Householding—Delivery of Shareholder Documents
This is to inform you about OppenheimerFunds’ “householding” policy. If more than one member of your household maintains an account in a particular fund, OppenheimerFunds will mail only one copy of the fund’s prospectus (or, if available, the fund’s summary prospectus), annual and semiannual report and privacy policy. The consolidation of these mailings, called householding, benefits your fund through reduced mailing expense, and benefits you by reducing the volume of mail you receive from OppenheimerFunds. Householding does not affect the delivery of your account statements.
Please note that we will continue to household these mailings for as long as you remain an OppenheimerFunds shareholder, unless you request otherwise. If you prefer to receive multiple copies of these materials, please call us at 1.800.CALL-OPP (225-5677). You may also notify us in writing or via email. We will begin sending you individual copies of the prospectus (or, if available, the summary prospectus), reports and privacy policy within 30 days of receiving your request to stop householding.
|
102 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited
| | |
Name, Position(s) Held with the Fund, Length of Service, Year of Birth | | Principal Occupation(s) During the Past 5 Years; Other Trusteeships/ Directorships Held. |
| |
INDEPENDENT TRUSTEES | | The address of each Trustee in the chart below is 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924. Each Trustee serves for an indefinite term, or until his or her resignation, retirement, death or removal. Each of the Trustees in the chart below oversees 48 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. |
| |
Brian F. Wruble, Chairman of the Board of Trustees (since 2007) and Trustee (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1943 | | Governor of Community Foundation of the Florida Keys (non-profit) (since July 2012); Director of TCP Capital, Inc. (registered business development company) (since November 2015); Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Trustees (since August 2011), Chairman of the Board of Trustees (August 2007-August 2011), Trustee of the Board of Trustees (since August 1991) of The Jackson Laboratory (non-profit); Member of Zurich Insurance Group’s Investment Management Advisory Council (insurance) (October 2004-February 2017); Treasurer (since 2007) and Trustee (since May 1992) of the Institute for Advanced Study (non-profit educational institute); Director of Special Value Opportunities Fund, LLC (registered investment company) (affiliate of the Sub-Adviser’s parent company) (September 2004- June 2015); General Partner of Odyssey Partners, L.P. (hedge fund) (September 1995-December 2007); Special Limited Partner of Odyssey Investment Partners, LLC (private equity investment) (January 1999-September 2004). Mr. Wruble has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since April 2001, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Beth Ann Brown, Trustee (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1968 | | Director, Board of Directors of Caron Engineering Inc. (since January 2018); Advisor, Board of Advisors of Caron Engineering Inc. (December 2014-December 2017); Independent Consultant (since September 2012); held the following positions at Columbia Management Investment Advisers LLC: Head of Intermediary Distribution (2008-2012), Managing Director, Strategic Relations (2005-2008), Managing Director, Head of National Accounts (2004-2005); Senior Vice President, National Account Manager (2002-2004), Senior Vice President, Key Account Manager (1999-2002) and Vice President, Key Account Manager (1996-1999) of Liberty Funds Distributor, Inc.; President and Director, of Acton Shapleigh Youth Conservation Corps (non -profit) (2012-2015); and Vice President and Director of Grahamtastic Connection (non-profit) (since May 2013). Ms. Brown has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since January 2016, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., Trustee (since 2013) Year of Birth: 1948 | | Director of THL Credit, Inc. (since November 2016) (alternative credit investment manager); Advisory Board Member of the Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs of Syracuse University (April 2012-September 2016); Director of Mercury Defense Systems Inc. (information technology) (August 2011-February 2013); Trustee of the U.S. Naval Academy Foundation Athletic & Scholarship Program (since November 2010); Advisory Board Member of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lincoln Laboratory (federally-funded research development) (since May 2010); Director of The Boeing Company (aerospace and defense) (since October 2009); Trustee of MITRE Corporation (federally-funded research development) (since September 2008); Independent Director of QinetiQ Group Plc (defense technology and security) (February 2008-August 2011); Chairman of Monster |
|
103 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited / Continued
| | |
Edmund P. Giambastiani, Jr., Continued | | Worldwide, Inc. (career services) (March 2015-November 2016), Director of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (career services) (February 2008-June 2011); Lead Director (June 2011-March 2015); Chairman of Alenia North America, Inc. (military and defense products) (January 2008-October 2009); Director of SRA International, Inc. (information technology and services) (January 2008-July 2011); President of Giambastiani Group LLC (national security and energy consulting) (since October 2007); United States Navy, career nuclear submarine officer (June 1970-October 2007); Seventh Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (2005-October 2007); Supreme Allied Commander of NATO Allied Command Transformation (2003- 2005) and Commander, U.S. Joint Forces Command (2002-2005). Since his retirement from the U.S. Navy in October 2007, Admiral Giambastiani has also served on numerous U.S. Government advisory boards, investigations and task forces for the Secretaries of Defense, State and Interior and the Central Intelligence Agency. He recently completed serving as a federal commissioner on the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission. Admiral Giambastiani has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since February 2013, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. For purposes of this report, Admiral Giambastiani is identified as a Trustee. |
| |
Elizabeth Krentzman, Trustee (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1959 | | Trustee of the University of Florida National Board Foundation (since September 2017); Member of the Cartica Funds Board of Directors (private investment funds) (since January 2017); Member of the University of Florida Law Center Association, Inc. Board of Trustees and Audit Committee Member (since April 2016); Member of University of Florida Law Advisory Board, Washington, DC Alumni Group (since 2015); Advisory Board Member of the Securities and Exchange Commission Historical Society (since 2007); held the following positions at Deloitte & Touche LLP: Principal and Chief Regulatory Advisor for Asset Management Services (2007 - 2014) and U.S. Mutual Fund Leader (2011 - 2014); General Counsel of the Investment Company Institute (trade association) (June 2004 - April 2007); held the following positions at Deloitte & Touche LLP: National Director of the Investment Management Regulatory Consulting Practice (1997 - 2004), Principal (2003 - 2004), Director (1998 - 2003) and Senior Manager (1997 - 1998); Assistant Director of the Division of Investment Management - Office of Disclosure and Investment Adviser Regulation of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (1996 - 1997) and various positions with the Division of Investment Management – Office of Regulatory Policy (1991 - 1996) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission; Associate at Ropes & Gray LLP (1987 – 1991). Ms. Krentzman has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since August 2014, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Mary F. Miller, Trustee (since 2007) Year of Birth: 1942 | | Trustee of International House (not-for-profit) (since June 2007); Trustee of the American Symphony Orchestra (not-for-profit) (October 1998-November 2011); and Senior Vice President and General Auditor of American Express Company (financial services company) (July 1998-February 2003). Ms. Miller has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since August 2004, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
|
104 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | |
Joel W. Motley, Trustee (since 2002) Year of Birth: 1952 | | Director of Office of Finance Federal Home Loan Bank (since September 2016); Director of Greenwall Foundation (since October 2013); Member of Board and Investment Committee of The Greenwall Foundation (since April 2013); Member of the Vestry of Trinity Wall Street (since April 2012); Director of Southern Africa Legal Services Foundation (since March 2012); Board Member and Investment Committee Member of Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting (non-profit journalism) (since March 2011); Managing Director of Public Capital Advisors, LLC (privately-held financial advisor) (since January 2006); Managing Director of Carmona Motley, Inc. (privately-held financial advisor) (since January 2002); Director of Columbia Equity Financial Corp. (privately-held financial advisor) (2002-2007); Managing Director of Carmona Motley Hoffman Inc. (privately-held financial advisor) (January 1998-December 2001); Member of the Finance and Budget Committee of the Council on Foreign Relations, Member of the Investment Committee and Board of Human Rights Watch (since July 2000) and Member of the Investment Committee and Board of Historic Hudson Valley (since February 2010). Mr. Motley has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since October 2002, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| |
Joanne Pace, Trustee (since 2013) Year of Birth: 1958 | | Advisory Board Director of Massey Quick Simon & Co. (wealth management), LLC (since October 2014); Board Director of Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Jersey (healthcare) (since November 2012); Advisory Board Director of The Alberleen Group LLC (investment banking) (since March 2012); Governing Council Member (since 2016) and Chair of Education Committee (since 2017) of Independent Directors Council (IDC) (since 2016); Board Member of 100 Women in Finance (non-profit) (since January 2015); Advisory Council Member of Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital (non-profit) (since May 2012); Director of The Komera Project (non-profit) (April 2012-2016); New York Advisory Board Director of Peace First (non-profit) (March 2010-2013); Senior Advisor of SECOR Asset Management, LP (2010-2011); Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of Morgan Stanley Investment Management (2006-2010); Partner and Chief Operating Officer of FrontPoint Partners, LLC (hedge fund) (2005-2006); held the following positions at Credit Suisse (investment banking): Managing Director (2003-2005); Global Head of Human Resources and member of Executive Board and Operating Committee (2004-2005), Global Head of Operations and Product Control (2003-2004); held the following positions at Morgan Stanley: Managing Director (1997-2003), Controller and Principal Accounting Officer (1999-2003); Chief Financial Officer (temporary assignment) for the Oversight Committee, Long Term Capital Management (1998-1999). Lead Independent Director and Chair of the Audit and Nominating Committee of The Global Chartist Fund, LLC of Oppenheimer Asset Management (2011-2012); Board Director of Managed Funds Association (2008-2010); Board Director of Morgan Stanley Foundation (2007-2010) and Investment Committee Chair (2008-2010). Ms. Pace has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since November 2012, including as an Advisory Board Member for certain Oppenheimer funds, during which time she has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Board’s deliberations. For purposes of this report, Ms. Pace is identified as a Trustee. |
|
105 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited / Continued
| | |
Daniel Vandivort, Trustee (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1954 | | Chairman and Lead Independent Director/Trustee (March 2010-September 2014), Chairman of the Audit Committee (March 2009-September 2014) and Director/Trustee (December 2008-September 2014) of the Board of Directors/ Trustees of Value Line Funds; Trustee (since January 2015) and Treasurer and Chairman of the Audit Committee and Finance Committee (since January 2016) of Board of Trustees of Huntington Disease Foundation of America; Trustee, Board of Trustees, RIM Retirement Savings Plan (2005-2007); President and Chief Investment Officer, Robeco Investment Management, formerly known as Weiss Peck and Greer (January 2005-June 2007); Member, Management Committee of Robeco Investment Management (2001-2007); Chairman and Trustee of the Board of Trustees of Weiss, Peck and Greer Funds (2004-2005); Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income, Weiss, Peck and Greer (November 1994-January 2005); Managing Director and Head of Fixed Income, CS First Boston Investment Management (January 1992-November 1994); Director, Global Product Development, First Boston Asset Management (November 1989-January 1992); Vice President, Fixed Income Sales, First Boston Corp. (May 1984-November 1989). Mr. Vandivort has served on the Boards of certain Oppenheimer funds since 2014, during which time he has become familiar with the Fund’s (and other Oppenheimer funds’) financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters and has contributed to the Boards’ deliberations. |
| | |
INTERESTED TRUSTEE AND OFFICER | | Mr. Steinmetz is an “Interested Trustee” because he is affiliated with the Manager and the Sub-Adviser by virtue of his positions as Chairman of the Sub-Adviser and officer and director of the Manager. Both as a Trustee and as an officer, Mr. Steinmetz serves for an indefinite term, or until his resignation, retirement, death or removal. Mr. Steinmetz’s address is 225 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10281-1008. Mr. Steinmetz is an officer of 104 portfolios in the OppenheimerFunds complex. |
| |
Arthur P. Steinmetz, Trustee (since 2015), President and Principal Executive Officer (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1958 | | Chairman of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (since January 2015); CEO and Chairman of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since July 2014), President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since May 2013), a Director of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since January 2013), Director of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (since July 2014), President, Management Director and CEO of Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp. (OppenheimerFunds, Inc.‘s parent holding company) (since July 2014), and President and Director of OFI SteelPath, Inc. (since January 2013). Chief Investment Officer of the OppenheimerFunds advisory entities from (January 2013-December 2013); Executive Vice President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (January 2013-May 2013); Chief Investment Officer of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (October 2010-December 2012); Chief Investment Officer, Fixed-Income, of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (April 2009-October 2010); Executive Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (October 2009-December 2012); Director of Fixed Income of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (January 2009-April 2009); and a Senior Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (March 1993-September 2009). |
| | |
OTHER OFFICERS OF THE FUND | | The addresses of the Officers in the chart below are as follows: for Messrs. Cottier, Willis, DeMitry, Camarella, Pulire, Stein, Mss. Lo Bessette, Foxson and Picciotto, 225 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10281-1008, for Mr. Petersen, 6803 S. Tucson Way, Centennial, Colorado 80112-3924. Each Officer serves for an indefinite term or until his or her resignation, retirement, death or removal. |
| |
Scott S. Cottier, Vice President (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1971 | | Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since January 2017) and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since September 2002). Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (September 2002-January 2017). Portfolio Manager and trader at Victory Capital Management (1999-2002). Team Leader, a Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
|
106 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
| | |
Troy E. Willis, Vice President (since 2005) Year of Birth: 1972 | | Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since January 2017) and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since January 2006); Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2009-January 2017); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2005- June 2009). Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (June 2002-December 2005). Corporate Attorney for Southern Resource Group (June 1999-July 2001). Team Leader, a Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Mark R. DeMitry, Vice President (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1976 | | Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since July 2009); Associate Portfolio Manager of the Fund (September 2006- June 2009). Research Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (June 2003-September 2006) and a Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (July 2001-May 2003). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Michael L. Camarella, Vice President (since 2009) Year of Birth: 1976 | | Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since January 2011); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (July 2009-December 2010); Associate Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (January 2008-December 2010). Research Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (April 2006-December 2007) and a Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (June 2003-March 2006). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Charles S. Pulire, Vice President (since 2011) Year of Birth: 1977 | | Vice President of the Sub-Adviser and a Senior Portfolio Manager (since February 2013); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (December 2010-January 2013); Research Analyst of the Manager (February 2008-November 2010); Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (May 2006-January 2008). Senior Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Elizabeth S. Mossow, Vice President (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1978 | | Senior Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (since January 2017); Vice President and Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (January 2016-January 2017); Assistant Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (January 2011-January 2016); Associate Portfolio Manager of the Sub-Adviser (June 2013-January 2016); Portfolio Research Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (June 2011 to June 2013); Credit Analyst of the Sub-Adviser (May 2007 to May 2011). She was a Risk Management Analyst at Manning & Napier Associates (September 2006-May 2007); Analyst/Trading Assistant at The Baupost Group (August 2000-March 2006). Portfolio Manager, an officer and a trader for the Fund and other Oppenheimer funds. |
| |
Richard A. Stein, Vice President (since 2007) Year of Birth: 1957 | | Director of the Rochester Credit Analysis team (since March 2004); Senior Vice President of the Sub-Adviser (since June 2011) and a Vice President of the Sub- Adviser (November 1997-May 2011); heads up the Rochester Credit Analysis team (since May 1993). |
|
107 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
TRUSTEES AND OFFICERS Unaudited / Continued
| | |
| |
Cynthia Lo Bessette, Secretary and Chief Legal Officer (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1969 | | Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since February 2016); Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (March 2015-February 2016); Chief Legal Officer of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. and OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (since February 2016); Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Oppenheimer Acquisition Corp. (since February 2016); General Counsel of OFI SteelPath, Inc., OFI Advisors, LLC and Index Management Solutions, LLC (since February 2016); Chief Legal Officer of OFI Global Institutional, Inc., HarbourView Asset Management Corporation, OFI Global Trust Company, Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc., OFI Private Investments Inc., Shareholder Services, Inc. and Trinity Investment Management Corporation (since February 2016); Corporate Counsel (February 2012-March 2015) and Deputy Chief Legal Officer (April 2013-March 2015) of Jennison Associates LLC; Assistant General Counsel (April 2008-September 2009) and Deputy General Counsel (October 2009-February 2012) of Lord Abbett & Co. LLC. |
| |
Jennifer Foxson, Vice President and Chief Business Officer (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1969 | | Senior Vice President of OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (since June 2014); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. (April 2006-June 2014); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (January 1998-March 2006); Assistant Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (October 1991-December 1998). |
| |
Mary Ann Picciotto, Chief Compliance Officer and Chief Anti-Money Laundering Officer (since 2014) Year of Birth: 1973 | | Senior Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since March 2014); Chief Compliance Officer of OppenheimerFunds, Inc., OFI SteelPath, Inc., OFI Global Institutional, Inc., Oppenheimer Real Asset Management, Inc., OFI Private Investments Inc., Harborview Asset Management Corporation, Trinity Investment Management Corporation, and Shareholder Services, Inc. (since March 2014); Managing Director of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. and certain of its various affiliated entities; Chief Compliance Officer of various Morgan Stanley Funds (May 2010-January 2014); Chief Compliance Officer of Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. (April 2007-January 2014). |
| |
Brian S. Petersen, Treasurer and Principal Financial & Accounting Officer (since 2016) Year of Birth: 1970 | | Senior Vice President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (since January 2017); Vice President of OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. (January 2013-January 2017); Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (February 2007-December 2012); Assistant Vice President of OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (August 2002-2007). |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers and is available without charge upon request by calling 1.800.CALL OPP (225.5677).
|
108 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND
| | |
Manager | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
| |
Sub-Adviser | | OppenheimerFunds, Inc. |
| |
Distributor | | OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. |
| |
Transfer and Shareholder | | OFI Global Asset Management, Inc. |
Servicing Agent | | |
| |
Sub-Transfer Agent | | Shareholder Services, Inc. |
| | DBA OppenheimerFunds Services |
| |
Independent Registered | | KPMG LLP |
Public Accounting Firm | | |
| |
Legal Counsel | | Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP |
© 2018 OppenheimerFunds, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
109 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
PRIVACY NOTICE
As an Oppenheimer fund shareholder, you are entitled to know how we protect your personal information and how we limit its disclosure.
Information Sources
We obtain non-public personal information about our shareholders from the following sources:
● | | Applications or other forms. |
● | | When you create a user ID and password for online account access. |
● | | When you enroll in eDocs Direct,SM our electronic document delivery service. |
● | | Your transactions with us, our affiliates or others. |
● | | Technologies on our website, including: “cookies” and web beacons, which are used to collect data on the pages you visit and the features you use. |
If you visit oppenheimerfunds.com and do not log on to the secure account information areas, we do not obtain any personal information about you. When you do log on to a secure area, we do obtain your user ID and password to identify you. We also use this information to provide you with products and services you have requested, to inform you about products and services that you may be interested in and assist you in other ways.
We do not collect personal information through our website unless you willingly provide it to us, either directly by email or in those areas of the website that request information. In order to update your personal information (including your mailing address, email address and phone number) you must first log on and visit your user profile.
If you have set your browser to warn you before accepting cookies, you will receive the warning message with each cookie. You can refuse cookies by turning them off in your browser. However, doing so may limit your access to certain sections of our website.
We use cookies to help us improve and manage our website. For example, cookies help us recognize new versus repeat visitors to the site, track the pages visited, and enable some special features on the website. This data helps us provide better service for our website visitors.
Protection of Information
We do not disclose any non-public personal information (such as names on a customer list) about current or former customers to anyone, except as permitted by law.
Disclosure of Information
Copies of confirmations, account statements and other documents reporting activity in your fund accounts are made available to your financial advisor (as designated by you). We may also use details about you and your investments to help us, our financial service affiliates, or firms that jointly market their financial products and services with ours, to better serve your investment needs or suggest educational material that may be of interest to you. If this requires us to provide you with an opportunity to “opt in” or “opt out” of such information sharing with a firm not affiliated with us, you will receive notification on how to do so, before any such sharing takes place.
Right of Refusal
We will not disclose your personal information to unaffiliated third parties (except as permitted by law), unless we first offer you a reasonable opportunity to refuse or “opt out” of such disclosure.
|
110 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
Internet Security and Encryption
In general, the email services provided by our website are encrypted and provide a secure and private means of communication with us. To protect your own privacy, confidential and/ or personal information should only be communicated via email when you are advised that you are using a secure website.
As a security measure, we do not include personal or account information in non-secure emails, and we advise you not to send such information to us in non-secure emails. Instead, you may take advantage of the secure features of our website to encrypt your email correspondence. To do this, you will need to use a browser that supports Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol.
● | | All transactions conducted via our websites, including redemptions, exchanges and purchases, are secured by the highest encryption standards available. SSL is used to establish a secure connection between your PC and OppenheimerFunds’ server. It transmits information in an encrypted and scrambled format. |
● | | Encryption is achieved through an electronic scrambling technology that uses a “key” to code and then decode the data. Encryption acts like the cable converter box you may have on your television set. It scrambles data with a secret code so that no one can make sense of it while it is being transmitted. When the data reaches its destination, the same software unscrambles the data. |
● | | You can exit the secure area by closing your browser or, for added security, you can use the Log Out button before you close your browser. |
Other Security Measures
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your personal account information. Our employees and agents have access to that information only so that they may offer you products or provide services, for example, when responding to your account questions.
How You Can Help
You can also do your part to keep your account information private and to prevent unauthorized transactions. If you obtain a user ID and password for your account, safeguard that information. Strengthening your online credentials–your online security profile–typically your user name, password, and security questions and answers, can be one of your most important lines of defense on the Internet. For additional information on how you can help prevent identity theft, visit https://www.oppenheimerfunds.com/security.
Who We Are
This joint notice describes the privacy policies of the Oppenheimer funds, OppenheimerFunds, Inc., each of its investment adviser subsidiaries, OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. and OFI Global Trust Co. It applies to all Oppenheimer fund accounts you presently have, or may open in the future, using your Social Security number—whether or not you remain a shareholder of our funds. This notice was last updated as of November 2017. In the event it is updated or changed, we will post an updated notice on our website at oppenheimerfunds.com. If you have any questions about this privacy policy, email us by clicking on the Contact Us section of our website at oppenheimerfunds.com, write to us at P.O. Box 5270, Denver, CO 80217-5270, or call us at 800 CALL OPP (225 5677).
|
111 OPPENHEIMER ROCHESTER HIGH YIELD MUNICIPAL FUND |
![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g590570dsp112a.jpg)
OppenheimerFunds®
The Right Way
to Invest
Visit us at oppenheimerfunds.com for 24-hr access to account information and transactions or call us at 800.CALL OPP (800.225.5677) for 24-hr automated information and automated transactions. Representatives also available Mon–Fri 8am-8pm ET.
| | |
Visit Us oppenheimerfunds.com Call Us 800 225 5677 | | |
Follow Us ![LOGO](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001193125-18-294642/g590570page112.jpg)
| | Oppenheimer funds are distributed by OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. 225 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10281-1008 © 2018 OppenheimerFunds Distributor, Inc. All rights reserved. RA0795.001.0718 September 27, 2018 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The Board of Trustees of the registrant has determined that Joanne Pace, the Board’s Audit Committee Chairwoman, is an audit committee financial expert and that Ms. Pace is “independent” for purposes of this Item 3.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed $151,400 in fiscal 2018 and $148,600 in fiscal 2017.
(b) Audit-Related Fees
The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed $8,100 in fiscal 2018 and $12,150 in fiscal 2017.
The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed $343,361 in fiscal 2018 and $320,775 in fiscal 2017 to the registrant’s investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant.
Such services include: Internal control reviews, GIPS attestation procedures, custody audits, CP Conduit fees, incremental, and additional, audit services
(c) Tax Fees
The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed no such fees in fiscal 2018 and no such fees in fiscal 2017.
The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed $533,392 in fiscal 2018 and $710,577 in fiscal 2017 to the registrant’s investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant.
Such services include: tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice. Tax compliance generally involves preparation of original and amended tax returns, claims for a refund and tax payment-planning services. Tax planning and tax advice includes assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.
(d) All Other Fees
The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed no such fees in fiscal 2018 and no such fees in fiscal 2017.
The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed no such fees in fiscal 2018 and no such fees in fiscal 2017 to the registrant’s investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant.
Such fees would include the cost to the principal accountant of attending audit committee meetings and consultations regarding the registrant’s retirement plan with respect to its Trustees.
(e) | (1) During its regularly scheduled periodic meetings, the registrant’s audit committee will pre-approve all audit, audit-related, tax and other services to be provided by the principal accountants of the registrant. |
The audit committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its Chairwoman for any subsequent new engagements that arise between regularly scheduled meeting dates provided that any fees such pre-approved are presented to the audit committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
Under applicable laws, pre-approval of non-audit services may be waived provided that: 1) the aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more than five percent of the total amount of fees paid by the registrant to its principal accountant during the fiscal year in which services are provided 2) such services were not recognized by the registrant at the time of engagement as non-audit services and 3) such services are promptly brought to the attention of the audit committee of the registrant and approved prior to the completion of the audit.
(2) 0%
(f) | Not applicable as less than 50%. |
(g) | The principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements billed $884,853 in fiscal 2018 and $1,043,502 in fiscal 2017 to the registrant and the registrant’s investment adviser or any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant related to non-audit fees. Those billings did not include any prohibited non-audit services as defined by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
(h) | The registrant’s audit committee of the board of Trustees has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrant’s investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence. No such services were rendered. |
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not applicable.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
The Fund’s Governance Committee Provisions with Respect to Nominations of Directors/Trustees to the Respective Boards
None
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
Based on their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c)) as of 7/31/2018, the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer found the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures to provide reasonable assurances that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in the reports that it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (a) is accumulated and communicated to registrant’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (b) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Disclosure of Securities Lending Activities for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 13. Exhibits.
(a) | (1) Exhibit attached hereto. |
(2) Exhibits attached hereto.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Oppenheimer Multi-State Municipal Trust
| | |
By: | | /s/ Arthur P. Steinmetz |
| | Arthur P. Steinmetz |
| | Principal Executive Officer |
| |
Date: | | 9/21/2018 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | |
By: | | /s/ Arthur P. Steinmetz |
| | Arthur P. Steinmetz |
| | Principal Executive Officer |
| |
Date: | | 9/21/2018 |
| | |
By: | | /s/ Brian S. Petersen |
| | Brian S. Petersen |
| | Principal Financial Officer |
| |
Date: | | 9/21/2018 |