UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811- 5968
John Hancock Municipal Securities Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
601 Congress Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Alfred P. Ouellette
Senior Counsel and Assistant Secretary
601 Congress Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02210
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: 617-663-4324
| Date of fiscal year end: | August 31 |
| Date of reporting period: | February 28, 2007 |
ITEM 1. | REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS. | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09759/0975961e1be6f17ecd8a75f40acb392b9afe0808" alt=""
CEO corner
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c5fb/8c5fb6daaf6a46797a9ebbd43098964bd73cdbf2" alt=""
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
Your fund at a glance |
page 1 |
|
|
Managers’ report |
page 2 |
|
|
A look at performance |
page 6 |
|
|
Your expenses |
page 8 |
|
|
Fund’s investments |
page 1 0 |
|
|
Financial statements |
page 2 1 |
|
|
Notes to financial |
statements |
page 2 7 |
|
|
For more information |
page 3 6 |
|
To Our Shareholders,
The U.S. financial markets turned in strong results over the last six months, as earlier concerns of rising inflation, a housing slowdown and high energy prices gave way to news of slower, but still resilient, economic growth, stronger than expected corporate earnings and dampened inflation fears and energy costs. This environment also led the Federal Reserve Board to hold short-term interest rates steady. Even with a sharp decline in the last days of the period, the broad stock market returned 8.93% for the six months ended February 28, 2007, as measured by the S&P 500 Index. With interest rates remaining relatively steady, fixed-income securities also produced positive results.
But after a remarkably long period of calm, the financial markets were rocked at the end of the period by a dramatic sell-off in China’s stock market, which had ripple effects on financial markets worldwide. In the United States, for example, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had its steepest one-day percentage decline in nearly four years on February 27, 2007. The event served to jog investors out of their seemingly casual attitude toward risk and remind them of the simple fact that stock markets move in two directions — down as well as up.
It was also a good occasion to bring to mind several important investment principles that we believe are at the foundation of successful investing. First, keep a long-term approach to investing, avoiding emotional reactions to daily market moves. Second, maintain a well-diversified portfolio that is appropriate for your goals, risk profile and time horizons.
After the market’s moves of the last six months, we encourage investors to sit back, take stock and set some realistic expectations. While history bodes well for the market in 2007 (since 1939, the S&P 500 Index has always produced positive results in the third year of a presidential term), there are no guarantees, and opinions are divided on the future of this more-than-four-year-old bull market. The recent downturn bolsters this uncertainty, although we believe it was a healthy correction for which we were overdue.
The latest events could also be a wake-up call to contact your financial professional to determine whether changes are in order to your investment mix. Some asset groups have had long runs of outperformance. Others had truly outsized returns in 2006. These trends argue for a look to determine if these categories now represent a larger stake in your portfolios than prudent diversification would suggest they should. After all, we believe investors with a well-balanced portfolio and a marathon — not a sprint — approach to investing, stand a better chance of weathering the market’s short-term twists and turns and reaching their long-term goals.
Sincerely,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88044/88044775b6621b87d23164b36009db2a82115e13" alt=""
Keith F. Hartstein,
President and Chief Executive Officer
This commentary reflects the CEO’s views as of February 28, 2007. They are subject to change at any time.
Your fund at a glance
The Fund seeks a high level of interest income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with preservation of capital by normally investing at least 80% of its assets in tax-exempt debt obligations of any maturity.
Over the last six months
► Municipal bonds posted positive results, although they lagged the performance of the broad taxable bond market.
► The Fund’s return surpassed its peer group average and benchmark index.
► Transportation and tobacco bonds were the best performers in the portfolio, while higher-quality bonds lagged.
John Hancock Tax-Free Bond Fund
Fund performance for the six months ended February 28, 2007.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8403f/8403f4b716aa761ed8064094c704ce0310d7c794" alt=""
Total returns for the Fund are at net asset value with all distributions reinvested. These returns do not reflect the deduction of the maximum sales charge, which would reduce the performance shown above.
Top 10 holdings | |
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, 1-1-16, 6.000% | 4.4% |
|
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, 1-1-19, Zero | 3.8% |
|
Puerto Rico, Commonwealth of, 7-1-11, 8.082% | 3.4% |
|
Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Auth, 7-1-11, 8.939% | 3.1% |
|
Madera, County of, 3-15-15, 6.500% | 3.1% |
|
South Dakota Educational Enhancement Funding Corp, 6-1-32, 6.500% | 2.3% |
|
San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Agency, 1-15-17, 5.650% | 2.2% |
|
San Bernardino, County of, 8-1-17, 5.500% | 2.1% |
|
Massachusetts, Commonwealth of, 12-1-24, 5.500% | 2.0% |
|
Port Auth of New York & New Jersey, 10-1-19, 6.750% | 1.8% |
|
As a percentage of net assets on February 28, 2007.
1
Managers’ report
John Hancock
Tax-Free Bond Fund
Municipal bonds gained ground for the six months ended February 28, 2007, although they trailed the taxable bond market. The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index returned 2.89%, while the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index — a broad measure of the taxable bond market — returned 3.66% .
The modest gains in the municipal bond market masked an increase in volatility during the six-month period as investors reacted to changing economic conditions. Since the beginning of 2006, the U.S. economy has gradually slowed, led by a noteworthy decline in the housing market. However, sporadic signs of economic resiliency created some uncertainty regarding the underlying strength of the economy. As a result, economic reports over the last few months of the period had a magnified effect, causing greater fluctuations in the municipal bond market.
Inflation remained generally under control during the period, thanks largely to a 10% decline in energy prices. The combination of slowing economic growth and benign inflation led the Federal Reserve to hold short-term interest rates steady throughout the six-month period, after raising rates 17 times between June 2004 and June 2006. Consequently, the municipal yield curve remained “flat,” with short- and long-term bond yields nearly equal.
Municipal bond issuance, which had been relatively low for much of 2006, rose sharply in late 2006 and early 2007. Nonetheless, the
SCORECARD
INVESTMENT | | PERIOD’S PERFORMANCE... AND WHAT’S BEHIND THE NUMBERS |
Tobacco bonds | ▲ | Demand for yield |
Airline bonds | ▲ | Relatively high yields and improving industry fundamentals |
Shorter-term bonds | ▼ | Steady interest rate policy from the Fed led to underperformance |
| | relative to longer-term bonds |
2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/719a8/719a848d58544ae0958a8013e75df584719fba7b" alt=""
Portfolio Managers, MFC Global Investment Management (U.S.) LLC
Dianne Sales, CFA, and Frank A. Lucibella, CFA
increase in supply had little impact on municipal bond performance as strong investor demand helped absorb the new issues.
“The modest gains in the |
municipal bond market masked |
an increase in volatility during |
the six-month period as investors |
reacted to changing economic |
conditions.,, |
Credit environment
Over the past six months, municipal credit quality remained stable overall. Economic growth, though moderating, was robust enough to sustain solid tax revenues for many state and local governments. The most recent estimates indicate that personal and corporate income tax revenues have been better than expected, while sales tax revenues are slightly below forecasts. However, final tax revenue figures for 2006 won’t be available until June, after April’s tax receipts are tallied.
Fund performance
For the six months ended February 28, 2007, John Hancock Tax-Free Bond Fund’s Class A, Class B and Class C shares posted total returns of 3.10%, 2.72% and 2.72%, respectively, at net asset value. This performance outpaced the 2.61% average return of Morningstar’s Muni National Long Fund category1 and the 2.89% return of the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index. Keep in mind that your net asset value return will be different from the Fund’s performance if you were not invested in the Fund for the entire period or did not reinvest all distributions. See pages six and seven for historical performance information.
Yield sings
The bulk of the return in the municipal market during the period came from interest income, so securities offering the highest yields produced the best returns. Strong demand for yield in a relatively low interest rate
Tax-Free Bond Fund
3
environment also contributed to the outperformance of higher-yielding bonds. Lower-quality municipal bonds were the best performers, reflecting the inverse relationship between credit quality and yield.
Transportation bonds — one of the biggest sector weightings in the portfolio — performed well during the period. Not surprisingly, lower-quality bonds comprise a significant portion of the transportation sector. Within the portfolio’s transportation holdings, airline-related bonds, such as those financing the construction of an American Airlines terminal at John F. Kennedy Airport in New York City, posted the best results.
Another high-yielding segment of the portfolio that outperformed during the six-month period was tobacco bonds, which are backed by the proceeds from a legal settlement between 46 states and the major tobacco companies. As of February 28, 2007, the portfolio held tobacco-related bonds issued by five states — Iowa, New Jersey, New York, South Dakota and Washington.
Positioning for a steeper yield curve
During the period, we increased our exposure to intermediate-term bonds (particularly those maturing in five to ten years). This positioning tends to perform well when the yield curve grows increasingly steep; that is, when the gap between short- and long-term yields widens.
As we mentioned before, the yield curve remained relatively flat during the period, so this positioning did not pay off, but it did provide net asset value stability during this period of volatility. We expect to see a steeper municipal yield curve and a return to a more typical relationship between short- and long-term municipal bond yields at some point in the future.
SECTOR DISTRIBUTION2 |
General obligation | |
bonds | 10% |
Revenue bonds | |
Transportation | 19% |
Health | 11% |
Tobacco | 7% |
Electric | 7% |
Pollution | 5% |
Industrial development | 3% |
Water & sewer | 3% |
Special tax | 2% |
Education | 2% |
Sales tax | 2% |
Economic | |
development | 2% |
Housing | 1% |
Correctional facilities | 1% |
All other | 25% |
Event risk
An increasing concern for investors in the taxable corporate bond market is “event” risk, which is the potential for an unexpected event — such as a leveraged buy-out (LBO) or bankruptcy — to have an adverse impact on the value or credit rating of a corporate bond. This type of event risk can have an impact on the municipal bond market as well, though to a lesser extent.
Tax-Free Bond Fund
4
A recent example involved Texas-based utility TXU, which agreed to an LBO by a consortium of private equity firms in late February 2007. Bond investors tend to react negatively to an LBO because it increases the amount of debt on a company’s balance sheet. The Fund owns bonds that finance projects for a TXU subsidiary, and these bonds underperformed in the wake of the buy-out announcement.
Another example is the decline in the housing market and the subsequent bankruptcies of several sub-prime mortgage lenders, which could potentially impact municipal bonds related to housing and property development by slowing new development. We have been very careful about the land-development bonds in which we invest, emphasizing seasoned projects that are already well developed. These securities are less vulnerable to housing market weakness.
“The bulk of the return in the |
municipal market during the |
period came from interest |
income, so securities offering the |
highest yields produced the best |
returns.” |
Outlook
The U.S. economy has held up better than expected, though further slowing is likely. In general, however, we expect municipal credit quality and state tax revenues to remain fairly stable over the next six months. New municipal bond issuance in 2007 is expected to be in line with last year’s issuance levels.
With regard to the portfolio, we intend to maintain our focus on producing an above-average level of tax-free income through a diversified portfolio of municipal bonds. We will also continue to position the Fund to benefit from a steeper yield curve.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e9b8/2e9b83585167cc0f51ae1ba95bef3f0c5cc2eb9a" alt=""
This commentary reflects the views of the portfolio managers through the end of the Fund’s period discussed in this report. The managers’ statements reflect their own opinions. As such, they are in no way guarantees of future events and are not intended to be used as investment advice or a recommendation regarding any specific security. They are also subject to change at any time as market and other conditions warrant.
1 Figures from Morningstar, Inc. include reinvested dividends and do not take into account sales charges. Actual load-adjusted performance is lower.
2 As a percentage of net assets on February 28, 2007.
Tax-Free Bond Fund
5
A look at performance
For the periods ending February 28, 2007 | | | | | | |
|
| | Average annual returns | | Cumulative total returns | | | SEC 30- |
| | with maximum sales charge (POP) | with maximum sales charge (POP) | | | day yield |
| Inception | | | | Since | | | | | Since | as of |
Class | date | 1-year | 5-year | 10-year | inception | 6 months | 1-year | 5-year | 10-year | inception | 2-28-07 |
|
A | 1-5-90 | 0.45% | 3.88% | 4.56% | — | –1.52% | 0.45% | 20.99% | 56.22% | — | 3.80% |
|
B | 12-31-91 | –0.64 | 3.73 | 4.41 | — | –2.28 | –0.64 | 20.08 | 54.04 | — | 3.23 |
|
C | 4-1-99 | 3.36 | 4.07 | — | 3.66% | 1.72 | 3.36 | 22.07 | — | 32.90% | 3.23 |
|
Performance figures assume all distributions are reinvested. POP (Public Offering Price) figures reflect maximum sales charge on Class A shares of 4.5% and the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) on Class B and Class C shares. The returns for Class C shares have been adjusted to reflect the elimination of the front-end sales charge effective July 15, 2004. The Class B shares’ CDSC declines annually between years 1–6 according to the following schedule: 5, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1%. No sales charge will be assessed after the sixth year. Class C shares held for less than one year are subject to a 1% CDSC.
The returns reflect past results and should not be considered indicative of future performance. The return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, please call 1-800-225-5291 or visit the Fund’s Web site at www.jhfunds.com.
The performance table above and the chart on the next page do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Please note that a portion of the Fund’s income may be subject to taxes, and some investors may be subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Also note that capital gains are taxable.
The Fund’s performance results reflect any applicable expense reductions, without which the expenses would increase and results would have been less favorable.
Tax-Free Bond Fund
6
Growth of $10,000
This chart shows what happened to a hypothetical $10,000 investment in Tax-Free Bond Fund Class A shares for the period indicated. For comparison, we’ve shown the same investment in the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c78a/1c78aa15b81618351fccbec8ceb80e3744dd5a83" alt=""
| | | With maximum | |
Class | Period beginning | Without sales charge | sales charge | Index |
|
B1 | 2-28-97 | $15,404 | $15,404 | $17,490 |
|
C1 | 4-1-99 | 13,290 | 13,290 | 15,077 |
|
Assuming all distributions were reinvested for the period indicated, the table above shows the value of a $10,000 investment in the Fund’s Class B and Class C shares, respectively, as of February 28, 2007. The Class C shares investment with maximum sales charge has been adjusted to reflect the elimination of the front-end sales charge effective July 15, 2004. Performance of the classes will vary based on the difference in sales charges paid by shareholders investing in the different classes and the fee structure of those classes.
Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index that includes municipal bonds and is commonly used as a measure of bond performance.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Index figures do not reflect sales charges which would have resulted in lower values if they did.
1 No contingent deferred sales charge applicable.
Tax-Free Bond Fund
7
Your expenses
These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing operating expenses.
Understanding fund expenses
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs:
■ Transaction costs which include sales charges (loads) on purchases or redemptions (varies by share class), minimum account fee charge, etc.
■ Ongoing operating expenses including management fees, distribution and service fees (if applicable) and other fund expenses.
We are going to present only your ongoing operating expenses here.
Actual expenses/actual returns
This example is intended to provide information about your fund’s actual ongoing operating expenses, and is based on your fund’s actual return. It assumes an account value of $1,000.00 on September 1, 2006, with the same investment held until February 28, 2007.
| Account value | Ending value | Expenses paid during period |
| on 9-1-06 | on 2-28-07 | ended 2-28-071 |
|
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,031.00 | $5.18 |
|
Class B | 1,000.00 | 1,027.20 | 8.92 |
|
Class C | 1,000.00 | 1,027.20 | 8.92 |
|
Together with the value of your account, you may use this information to estimate the operating expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value at February 28, 2007 by $1,000.00, then multiply it by the “expenses paid” for your share class from the table above. For example, for an account value of $8,600.00, the operating expenses should be calculated as follows:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98378/983781877b14228e966d2678e4f5878dde74332d" alt=""
Tax-Free Bond Fund
8
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
This table allows you to compare your fund’s ongoing operating expenses with those of any other fund. It provides an example of the Fund’s hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on each class’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% annual return before expenses (which is not your fund’s actual return). It assumes an account value of $1,000.00 on September 1, 2006, with the same investment held until February 28, 2007. Look in any other fund shareholder report to find its hypothetical example and you will be able to compare these expenses.
| Account value | Ending value | Expenses paid during period |
| on 9-1-06 | on 2-28-07 | ended 2-28-071 |
|
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,019.70 | $5.15 |
|
Class B | 1,000.00 | 1,016.00 | 8.87 |
|
Class C | 1,000.00 | 1,016.00 | 8.87 |
|
Remember, these examples do not include any transaction costs, such as sales charges; therefore, these examples will not help you to determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. If transaction costs were included, your expenses would have been higher. See the prospectus for details regarding transaction costs.
1 Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.03%, 1.77% and 1.77% for Class A, Class B and Class C, respectively, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by number of days in most recent fiscal half-year/365 or 366 (to reflect the one-half year period).
Tax-Free Bond Fund
9
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Fund’s investments
Securities owned by the Fund on 2-28-07 (unaudited)
This schedule is divided into two main categories: tax-exempt long-term bonds and short-term investments. Tax-exempt long-term bonds are broken down by state or territory. Under each state or territory is a list of securities owned by the Fund. Short-term investments, which represent the Fund’s cash position, are listed last.
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
|
Tax-exempt long-term bonds 102.73% | | | | | $499,405,946 |
(Cost $453,264,730) | | | | | | |
Arizona 0.48% | | | | | | 2,335,953 |
|
Arizona Health Facilities Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Phoenix Memorial | | | | | | |
Hosp (G)(H) | 8.200% | | 06-01-21 | D | $2,150 | 43,000 |
|
Maricopa County Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Mtg Back Secs Prog Ser 1998B | 6.200 | | 12-01-30 | Aaa | 380 | 383,363 |
|
Navajo County Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Stone Container Corp Proj (G) | 7.200 | | 06-01-27 | B | 1,000 | 1,025,080 |
|
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corp District, | | | | | | |
Rev Cap Apprec Civic Plaza | | | | | | |
Ser 2005B (Zero to 07-01-13, | | | | | | |
then 5.500%) (O) | Zero | | 07-01-28 | AAA | 1,000 | 884,510 |
California 22.74% | | | | | | 110,559,984 |
|
California Pollution Control | | | | | | |
Financing Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Chemical Waste Mgmt Inc Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2005C | 5.125 | | 11-01-23 | BBB | 3,000 | 3,166,920 |
|
California, State of, | | | | | | |
Gen Oblig Unltd | 5.125 | | 04-01-23 | A+ | 2,000 | 2,146,600 |
Gen Oblig Unltd (P) | 3.450 | | 05-01-34 | AA+ | 2,600 | 2,600,000 |
|
Foothill/Eastern Transportation | | | | | | |
Corridor Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Toll Rd Cap Apprec | Zero | | 01-15-25 | BBB– | 5,000 | 1,830,550 |
Rev Toll Rd Cap Apprec Sr Lien | | | | | | |
Ser 1995A | Zero | | 01-01-19 | AAA | 30,000 | 18,552,300 |
Rev Toll Rd Sr Lien Ser 1995A | 6.000 | | 01-01-16 | AAA | 19,800 | 21,132,342 |
|
Madera, County of, | | | | | | |
Rev Cert of Part Valley Childrens Hosp | 6.500 | | 03-15-15 | AAA | 13,185 | 15,142,050 |
|
Millbrae, City of, | | | | | | |
Rev Magnolia of Milbrae Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 1997A (G) | 7.375 | | 09-01-27 | BB | 1,750 | 1,816,570 |
|
Sacramento City Financing Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Convention Ctr Hotel Sr | | | | | | |
Ser 1999A (G) | 6.250 | | 01-01-30 | BB+ | 4,000 | 4,165,760 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
10
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
|
California (continued) | | | | | | |
|
San Bernardino, County of, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Cert of Part Med Ctr Fin Proj | 5.500% | | 08-01-17 | AAA | $9,130 | $10,052,313 |
Rev Ref Cert of Part Med Ctr Fin Proj | 5.500 | | 08-01-22 | A+ | 2,500 | 2,805,525 |
|
San Diego Redevelopment Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Tax Alloc City Heights Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 1999A (G) | 5.750 | | 09-01-23 | BB | 25 | 25,847 |
|
San Joaquin Hills Transportation | | | | | | |
Corridor Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Toll Rd Conv Cap Apprec | | | | | | |
Ser 1997A | 5.650 | | 01-15-17 | BB– | 10,000 | 10,720,200 |
Rev Toll Rd Jr Lien | Zero | | 01-01-10 | AAA | 6,250 | 5,623,813 |
Rev Toll Rd Sr Lien | Zero | | 01-01-14 | AAA | 5,000 | 3,838,900 |
Rev Toll Rd Sr Lien | Zero | | 01-01-17 | AAA | 4,900 | 3,321,514 |
Rev Toll Rd Sr Lien | Zero | | 01-01-20 | AAA | 2,000 | 1,186,140 |
|
Santa Ana Financing Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Lease Police Admin & Hldg | | | | | | |
Facil Ser 1994A | 6.250 | | 07-01-19 | AAA | 2,000 | 2,432,640 |
Colorado 0.87% | | | | | | 4,246,280 |
|
E-470 Public Highway Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Cap Apprec Sr Ser 2000B | Zero | | 09-01-34 | BBB– | 7,000 | 1,008,770 |
|
Northwest Parkway Public | | | | | | |
Highway Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev 1st Tier Sub Ser 2001D | 7.125 | | 06-15-41 | CCC | 3,000 | 3,237,510 |
Delaware 0.67% | | | | | | 3,236,400 |
|
Charter MAC Equity Issuer Trust, | | | | | | |
Preferred Tax Exempt Shares | | | | | | |
Ser A-4-1 (S) | 5.750 | | 04-30-15 | A3 | 3,000 | 3,236,400 |
Florida 5.82% | | | | | | 28,280,651 |
|
Aberdeen Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment (G) | 5.500 | | 05-01-36 | BB+ | 2,250 | 2,293,852 |
|
Bonnet Creek Resort Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment (G) | 7.375 | | 05-01-34 | BB+ | 1,500 | 1,646,985 |
Rev Spec Assessment (G) | 7.250 | | 05-01-18 | BB+ | 1,000 | 1,101,920 |
|
Capital Projects Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Student Hsg Cap Projs Ln Prog | | | | | | |
Ser 2000A (G) | 7.850 | | 08-15-31 | AA | 3,500 | 4,024,300 |
Rev Student Hsg Cap Projs Ln Prog | | | | | | |
Ser 2001G (G) | 9.125 | | 10-01-11 | BBB | 900 | 948,357 |
|
Capital Trust Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Seminole Tribe Convention | | | | | | |
Ser 2003A | 8.950 | | 10-01-33 | AAA | 3,000 | 3,679,800 |
|
Crossings at Fleming Island | | | | | | |
Community Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Spec Assessment | | | | | | |
Ser 2000C (G) | 7.100 | | 05-01-30 | BBB– | 1,000 | 1,070,310 |
|
Hernando, County of, | | | | | | |
Rev Criminal Justice Complex | 7.650 | | 07-01-16 | AAA | 500 | 652,450 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
11
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
|
Florida (continued) | | | | | | |
|
Midtown Miami Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment Ser 2004A (G) | 6.000% | | 05-01-24 | BB | $1,750 | $1,892,608 |
|
Orange County Health | | | | | | |
Facilities Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Orlando Regional Healthcare | 5.750 | | 12-01-32 | A | 1,000 | 1,098,310 |
|
Orange County School Board, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Cert of Part Ser 1997A | Zero | | 08-01-13 | Aaa | 5,000 | 3,886,450 |
|
Orlando Urban Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment Cap Imp | | | | | | |
Ser 2001A (G) | 6.950 | | 05-01-33 | BB+ | 2,500 | 2,702,725 |
|
Orlando Utilities Commission, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Wtr & Elec Sys Sub | | | | | | |
Ser 1989D | 6.750 | | 10-01-17 | AA | 2,200 | 2,623,764 |
|
Stoneybrook West Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment Ser 2000A (G) | 7.000 | | 05-01-32 | BBB | 410 | 437,388 |
Rev Spec Assessment Ser 2000B (G) | 6.450 | | 05-01-10 | BBB | 220 | 221,432 |
Georgia 4.95% | | | | | | 24,068,223 |
|
Atlanta, City of, | | | | | | |
Rev Tax Alloc Eastside Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2005B (G) | 5.600 | | 01-01-30 | BB+ | 1,000 | 1,039,200 |
|
Georgia Municipal Electric Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Preref Ser 1993Z | 5.500 | | 01-01-20 | AAA | 150 | 171,429 |
Rev Preref Ser 1998Y | 6.500 | | 01-01-17 | AAA | 60 | 70,187 |
Rev Ref Pwr Ser 1993BB | 5.700 | | 01-01-19 | A+ | 1,000 | 1,121,490 |
Rev Ref Pwr Ser 1993C | 5.700 | | 01-01-19 | AAA | 5,000 | 5,803,700 |
Rev Ref Pwr Ser 1994EE | 7.250 | | 01-01-24 | AAA | 2,000 | 2,777,220 |
Rev Ref Pwr Ser 1998Y | 6.500 | | 01-01-17 | AAA | 145 | 177,422 |
Rev Unref Bal Ser 1993Z | 5.500 | | 01-01-20 | AAA | 5,690 | 6,342,871 |
Rev Unref Bal Ser 1998Y | 6.500 | | 01-01-17 | AAA | 4,635 | 5,439,914 |
|
Monroe County Development Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Poll Control Oglethorpe | | | | | | |
Pwr Corp Scherer Ser 1992A | 6.800 | | 01-01-12 | A | 1,000 | 1,124,790 |
Illinois 7.16% | | | | | | 34,793,168 |
|
Chicago Board of Education, | | | | | | |
Gen Oblig Cap Apprec School | | | | | | |
Reform Ser 1998B-1 | Zero | | 12-01-15 | AAA | 3,000 | 2,120,670 |
Gen Oblig Unltd Ser 2005A | 5.500 | | 12-01-26 | AAA | 5,290 | 6,350,116 |
|
Chicago, City of, | | | | | | |
Gen Oblig Tax Alloc Jr Pilsen | | | | | | |
Redev Ser 2004B (G) | 6.750 | | 06-01-22 | BBB+ | 3,000 | 3,294,180 |
|
Illinois Development | | | | | | |
Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Commonwealth Edison | | | | | | |
Co Proj | 5.850 | | 01-15-14 | AAA | 3,000 | 3,355,470 |
|
Illinois Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Landing at Plymouth Place | | | | | | |
Proj Ser 2005A (G) | 6.000 | | 05-15-37 | BB | 1,000 | 1,070,510 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
12
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
|
Illinois (continued) | | | | | | |
|
Kane County Community School | | | | | | |
District No. 304, | | | | | | |
Gen Oblig Unltd Cap Apprec Ser 2004A | Zero | | 01-01-17 | Aaa | $4,705 | $3,152,632 |
|
Metropolitan Pier & | | | | | | |
Exposition Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Cap Apprec McCormick Pl Expn | | | | | | |
Ser 1993A | Zero | | 06-15-15 | AAA | 1,500 | 1,079,880 |
Rev Ref Cap Apprec McCormick Proj | Zero | | 06-15-15 | AAA | 1,000 | 719,920 |
Rev Ref Cap Apprec McCormick Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 1996A | Zero | | 12-15-16 | AAA | 2,330 | 1,573,100 |
|
Round Lake Beach, Village of, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Tax Lakewood Grove Spec | | | | | | |
Serv Area No. 1 (G) | 6.700% | | 03-01-33 | BBB– | 1,000 | 1,096,680 |
|
Southern Illinois University, | | | | | | |
Rev Cap Apprec Housing & Auxiliary | | | | | | |
Sys Ser 1993A | Zero | | 04-01-15 | AAA | 1,000 | 724,080 |
|
Will County Community Unit School | | | | | | |
District No. 201, | | | | | | |
Gen Oblig Cap Apprec Crete-Monee | Zero | | 11-01-13 | Aaa | 3,340 | 2,567,458 |
Gen Oblig Cap Apprec Crete-Monee | Zero | | 11-01-16 | Aaa | 2,900 | 1,962,343 |
|
Will County Community Unit School | | | | | | |
District No. 365, | | | | | | |
Gen Oblig Cap Apprec Comp Int | | | | | | |
Ser 1997B | Zero | | 11-01-14 | AAA | 3,510 | 2,589,959 |
Gen Oblig Unltd Ref | Zero | | 11-01-21 | AAA | 5,780 | 3,136,170 |
Indiana 0.22% | | | | | | 1,056,920 |
|
Vanderburgh County | | | | | | |
Redevelopment Commission, | | | | | | |
Rev Dist Tax Increment | 5.000 | | 02-01-26 | A– | 1,000 | 1,056,920 |
Iowa 1.18% | | | | | | 5,726,707 |
|
Iowa Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Hlth Facil Care | | | | | | |
Initiatives Proj Ser 2006 A | 5.500 | | 07-01-21 | BBB– | 1,250 | 1,323,850 |
Rev Ref Hlth Facil Care | | | | | | |
Initiatives Proj Ser 2006 A | 5.500 | | 07-01-25 | BBB– | 1,250 | 1,325,787 |
|
Iowa Tobacco Settlement Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Asset Backed Bond Cap Apprec | | | | | | |
Ser 2005B | Zero | | 06-01-34 | BBB | 3,000 | 3,077,070 |
Kansas 0.32% | | | | | | 1,565,835 |
|
Wyandotte, County of, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Sales Tax 2nd Lien Area B | 5.000 | | 12-01-20 | BBB– | 1,500 | 1,565,835 |
Kentucky 1.17% | | | | | | 5,694,536 |
|
Kentucky Economic Development | | | | | | |
Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Preref Norton Healthcare | | | | | | |
Ser 2000C | 6.100 | | 10-01-21 | AAA | 1,770 | 2,028,066 |
Rev Unref Bond Balance Norton | | | | | | |
Ser 2000C | 6.100 | | 10-01-21 | AAA | 3,230 | 3,666,470 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
13
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
|
Louisiana 0.16% | | | | | | $768,504 |
|
Jefferson Parish Home | | | | | | |
Mortgage Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Single Family Mtg | | | | | | |
Ser 1999B | 6.750% | | 06-01-30 | Aaa | $760 | 768,504 |
Maryland 1.09% | | | | | | 5,278,990 |
|
Baltimore Convention Center, | | | | | | |
Rev Hotel Ser 2006B | 5.875 | | 09-01-39 | BB | 1,000 | 1,066,270 |
|
Municipal Mortgage & Equity LLC, | | | | | | |
Bond (S) | 6.875 | | 06-30-49 | A3 | 4,000 | 4,212,720 |
Massachusetts 6.93% | | | | | | 33,682,616 |
|
Massachusetts Bay | | | | | | |
Transportation Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Sales Tax Ser 2005B | 5.500 | | 07-01-28 | AAA | 5,000 | 6,061,350 |
|
Massachusetts, Commonwealth of, | | | | | | |
Gen Oblig Unltd Ref Ser 2004C | 5.500 | | 12-01-24 | AAA | 8,000 | 9,560,000 |
|
Massachusetts Development | | | | | | |
Finance Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Boston Univ Ser 2002R-2 (P) | 3.620 | | 10-01-42 | AAA | 1,700 | 1,700,000 |
Rev Boston Univ Ser 2002R-4 (P) | 3.620 | | 10-01-42 | AAA | 400 | 400,000 |
|
Massachusetts Health & | | | | | | |
Educational Facilities Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Civic Investments Inc | | | | | | |
Ser 2002B (G) | 9.200 | | 12-15-31 | BB | 3,500 | 4,305,980 |
Rev Ref Partners Healthcare Sys | | | | | | |
Ser 2001C | 5.750 | | 07-01-32 | AA | 2,000 | 2,159,100 |
|
Massachusetts Industrial | | | | | | |
Finance Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Assisted Living Facil Newton | | | | | | |
Group Properties | 8.000 | | 09-01-27 | AAA | 1,305 | 1,368,762 |
|
Massachusetts Special Obligation | | | | | | |
Dedicated Tax, | | | | | | |
Rev | 5.250 | | 01-01-26 | AAA | 2,000 | 2,185,760 |
|
Massachusetts Water Pollution | | | | | | |
Abatement Trust, | | | | | | |
Rev Unref Bal Ser 1994A | 6.375 | | 02-01-15 | AAA | 75 | 75,164 |
|
Massachusetts Water | | | | | | |
Resource Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Gen Ser 2007B | 5.250 | | 08-01-27 | AAA | 5,000 | 5,866,500 |
Michigan 0.23% | | | | | | 1,106,590 |
|
Kent Hospital Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Met Hosp Proj Ser 2005A | 6.000 | | 07-01-35 | BBB | 1,000 | 1,106,590 |
Minnesota 0.78% | | | | | | 3,800,745 |
|
St. Cloud, City of, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref St Cloud Hosp Oblig Group | | | | | | |
Ser 2000A | 5.875 | | 05-01-30 | Aaa | 2,000 | 2,135,700 |
|
St. Paul Housing & | | | | | | |
Redevelopment Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Healtheast Hosp Proj | 6.000 | | 11-15-35 | BB+ | 1,500 | 1,665,045 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
14
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
Missouri 0.22% | | | | | | $1,094,554 |
|
Fenton, City of, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Tax Increment Imp | | | | | | |
Gravois Bluffs | 7.000% | | 10-01-21 | AAA | $955 | 1,094,554 |
Nebraska 0.29% | | | | | | 1,389,144 |
|
Omaha Public Power District, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Elec Imp Ser 1992B | 6.200 | | 02-01-17 | Aa2 | 1,200 | 1,389,144 |
Nevada 0.01% | | | | | | 25,065 |
|
Nevada, State of, | | | | | | |
Gen Oblig Ltd Unref Bal Ser 1992A | 6.750 | | 07-01-09 | AA+ | 25 | 25,065 |
New Hampshire 0.28% | | | | | | 1,378,675 |
|
New Hampshire Health & Education | | | | | | |
Facilities Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Exeter Proj | 6.000 | | 10-01-24 | A+ | 1,250 | 1,378,675 |
New Jersey 5.67% | | | | | | 27,582,906 |
|
New Jersey Economic | | | | | | |
Development Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Cigarette Tax | 5.500 | | 06-15-24 | BBB | 3,000 | 3,169,140 |
Rev Ref Newark Airport Marriot Hotel | 7.000 | | 10-01-14 | Ba1 | 2,000 | 2,067,920 |
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities | | | | | | |
Financing Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Care Institute Inc Cherry | | | | | | |
Hill Proj (G) | 8.000 | | 07-01-27 | B+ | 1,120 | 1,145,626 |
|
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement | | | | | | |
Financing Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Asset Backed Bond | 6.750 | | 06-01-39 | AAA | 5,000 | 5,844,650 |
Rev Asset Backed Bond | 6.250 | | 06-01-43 | AAA | 4,000 | 4,564,920 |
Rev Asset Backed Bond Ser 2007 1A | 4.500 | | 06-01-23 | BBB | 5,000 | 4,920,400 |
|
New Jersey Transportation Trust | | | | | | |
Fund Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Trans Sys Ser 2006A | 5.500 | | 12-15-23 | AA– | 5,000 | 5,870,250 |
New Mexico 0.42% | | | | | | 2,064,520 |
|
Farmington, City of, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Poll Control Tucson Elec | | | | | | |
Pwr Co Ser 1997A | 6.950 | | 10-01-20 | B+ | 2,000 | 2,064,520 |
New York 11.50% | | | | | | 55,922,851 |
|
Dutchess County Resource | | | | | | |
Recovery Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Resource Recovery Solid Waste | | | | | | |
Sys Ser 1999A | 5.350 | | 01-01-12 | AAA | 510 | 541,666 |
|
Long Island Power Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Elec Sys Ser 2006A | 5.000 | | 12-01-24 | AAA | 5,000 | 5,395,450 |
|
Nassau County Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Civic Facil North Shore | | | | | | |
Hlth Sys Projs Ser 2001B | 5.875 | | 11-01-11 | A3 | 610 | 638,548 |
|
New York City Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev American Airlines JFK | | | | | | |
Intl Arpt | 7.625 | | 08-01-25 | B | 2,500 | 3,004,000 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
15
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
|
New York (continued) | | | | | | |
|
New York City Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Agency, (continued) | | | | | | |
Rev Liberty 7 World Trade Ctr | | | | | | |
Ser 2005A (G) | 6.250% | | 03-01-15 | BB– | $2,000 | $2,127,540 |
Rev Ref Terminal One Group | | | | | | |
Assn Proj | 5.500 | | 01-01-24 | BBB+ | 1,500 | 1,641,540 |
|
New York City Municipal Water | | | | | | |
Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Preref Wtr & Swr Sys | | | | | | |
Ser 2000B | 6.000 | | 06-15-33 | AA+ | 365 | 395,467 |
Rev Unref Bal Wtr & Swr Sys | | | | | | |
Ser 2000B | 6.000 | | 06-15-33 | AA+ | 375 | 404,235 |
Rev Wtr & Swr Sys Ser 2000C (P) | 3.620 | | 06-15-33 | AA+ | 1,300 | 1,300,000 |
|
New York, City of, | | | | | | |
Gen Oblig Unltd Ser 1993B-2 (P) | 3.620 | | 08-15-20 | AAA | 2,500 | 2,500,000 |
|
New York City Transitional Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Future Tax Sec Ser 2002A | | | | | | |
(Zero to 11-01-11 then 14.000%) (O) | Zero | | 11-01-29 | AAA | 5,000 | 4,172,050 |
|
New York Liberty Development Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Goldman Sachs Headquarters | 5.250 | | 10-01-35 | AA– | 4,425 | 5,193,976 |
Rev National Sports Museum Proj | | | | | | |
Ser2006A (G) | 6.125 | | 02-15-19 | BB– | 1,000 | 1,056,120 |
|
New York State Dormitory Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev City Univ Sys Consol 2nd | | | | | | |
Generation Ser 1993A | 5.750 | | 07-01-09 | AA– | 1,000 | 1,034,020 |
Rev Personal Income Tax Ser 2005F | 5.000 | | 03-15-30 | AAA | 4,000 | 4,272,840 |
Rev Preref Ser 1990B | 7.500 | | 05-15-11 | AA– | 160 | 175,350 |
Rev Ref State Univ Edl Facil Ser 1993A | 5.500 | | 05-15-19 | AA– | 1,000 | 1,134,660 |
Rev Unref Bal Ser 1990B | 7.500 | | 05-15-11 | AA– | 210 | 230,108 |
|
New York State Environmental | | | | | | |
Facilities Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Poll Control (P) | 11.894 | | 06-15-11 | AAA | 2,000 | 2,553,200 |
|
New York State Housing | | | | | | |
Finance Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref State Univ Constr | | | | | | |
Ser 1986A | 8.000 | | 05-01-11 | AAA | 2,000 | 2,185,900 |
|
Port Auth of New York & | | | | | | |
New Jersey, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Spec Proj KIAC Partners | | | | | | |
Ser 4 (G) | 6.750 | | 10-01-19 | BBB– | 8,700 | 8,838,591 |
|
Suffolk County Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Jeffersons Ferry Proj | 5.000 | | 11-01-28 | BBB– | 1,000 | 1,030,890 |
|
Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ser 2006A | 5.000 | | 11-15-22 | AA– | 3,545 | 3,854,620 |
|
Westchester Tobacco Asset | | | | | | |
Securitization Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Asset Backed Bond (Zero to | | | | | | |
07-15-09, then 6.950%) (O) | Zero | | 07-15-09 | AAA | 2,000 | 2,242,080 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
16
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
|
North Carolina 0.44% | | | | | | $2,135,440 |
|
North Carolina Eastern Municipal | | | | | | |
Power Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Pwr Sys Ser 2003C | 5.375% | | 01-01-17 | BBB | $2,000 | 2,135,440 |
Ohio 0.64% | | | | | | 3,109,569 |
|
Cuyahoga, County of, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Cleveland Clinic Hlth Sys | | | | | | |
Ser 2003A | 5.750 | | 01-01-25 | AA– | 2,500 | 2,760,450 |
|
Student Loan Funding Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Cincinnati Student Loan | | | | | | |
Sub Ser 1991B (G) | 8.875 | | 08-01-08 | BBB | 340 | 349,119 |
Oklahoma 0.49% | | | | | | 2,387,520 |
|
Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Ser 2000A (P) | 7.750 | | 06-01-35 | B | 2,000 | 2,387,520 |
Oregon 0.78% | | | | | | 3,778,161 |
|
Salem Hospital Facility Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Salem Hospital Proj Ser 2006A | 5.000 | | 08-15-27 | A+ | 2,500 | 2,646,800 |
|
Western Generation Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Wauna Cogeneration Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2006B (G) | 5.000 | | 01-01-14 | BBB– | 1,100 | 1,131,361 |
Pennsylvania 2.54% | | | | | | 12,348,292 |
|
Allegheny County Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Environmental Imp | 5.500 | | 11-01-16 | BB+ | 2,500 | 2,662,675 |
|
Allegheny County | | | | | | |
Redevelopment Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Tax Alloc Pittsburgh Mills | | | | | | |
Proj (G) | 5.600 | | 07-01-23 | BB+ | 1,000 | 1,066,570 |
|
Carbon County Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Reg Resource Recovery Panther | | | | | | |
Creek Partners Proj | 6.700 | | 05-01-12 | BBB– | 4,960 | 5,361,214 |
|
Philadelphia Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Commercial Marriot Hotel (G) | 7.750 | | 12-01-17 | B+ | 3,250 | 3,257,833 |
Puerto Rico 12.02% | | | | | | 58,418,618 |
|
Puerto Rico Aqueduct & Sewer Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Inverse Floater (Gtd) (P) | 8.022 | | 07-01-11 | AAA | 6,500 | 7,650,240 |
Rev Ref Pars & Inflos (Gtd) | 6.000 | | 07-01-11 | AAA | 200 | 217,696 |
|
Puerto Rico Highway & | | | | | | |
Transportation Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Ser 2007N (N) | 5.500 | | 07-01-26 | BBB+ | 2,500 | 2,916,400 |
Rev Ser PA 114 (K)(P) | 8.939 | | 07-01-11 | AAA | 13,130 | 15,221,346 |
|
Puerto Rico Public Building Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Govt Facils | | | | | | |
Ser 2002F (Gtd) | 5.250 | | 07-01-20 | BBB | 2,000 | 2,227,900 |
|
Puerto Rico, Commonwealth of, | | | | | | |
Pub Impt-Ser A (I)(P) | 5.000 | | 07-01-18 | Aaa | 12,655 | 13,648,797 |
Rev Inverse Floater (P) | 8.082 | | 07-01-11 | AAA | 14,000 | 16,536,239 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
17
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
|
Rhode Island 0.22% | | | | | | $1,087,620 |
|
Tiverton, Town of, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Oblig Tax Mount Hope Bay | | | | | | |
Village Ser 2002A (G) | 6.875% | | 05-01-22 | BB+ | $1,000 | 1,087,620 |
South Carolina 0.44% | | | | | | 2,133,600 |
|
Dorchester County School District No. 2, | | | | | | |
Rev Growth Remedy Oppty Tax Hike | 5.250 | | 12-01-29 | A | 2,000 | 2,133,600 |
South Dakota 2.27% | | | | | | 11,024,800 |
|
South Dakota Educational | | | | | | |
Enhancement Funding Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Tobacco Settlement Asset | | | | | | |
Backed Bond Ser 2002B | 6.500 | | 06-01-32 | BBB | 10,000 | 11,024,800 |
Tennessee 1.17% | | | | | | 5,693,100 |
|
Tennessee Energy Acquisition Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Gas Ser 2006A | 5.250 | | 09-01-24 | AA– | 5,000 | 5,693,100 |
Texas 4.90% | | | | | | 23,834,549 |
|
Austin, City of, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Combined Util Sys Ser 1998 | 6.750 | | 11-15-10 | AAA | 3,125 | 3,450,406 |
|
Bexar County Health Facilities | | | | | | |
Development Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Army Retirement Residence Proj | 6.300 | | 07-01-32 | BBB | 1,000 | 1,128,470 |
|
Brazos River Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Poll Control Texas | | | | | | |
Utilities Co Ser 1999A | 7.700 | | 04-01-33 | BBB– | 1,500 | 1,722,285 |
|
Dallas Area Rapid Transit, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Sr Lien | 5.250 | | 12-01-29 | AAA | 5,000 | 5,869,850 |
|
Harris, County of, | | | | | | |
Ref Note | Zero | | 08-15-16 | AAA | 6,000 | 4,080,360 |
|
Houston Independent School District, | | | | | | |
Rev Cap Apprec Cesar E Chavez | | | | | | |
Ser 1998A | Zero | | 09-15-16 | AAA | 900 | 609,345 |
|
Port Corpus Christi Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Citgo Petroleum Corp Proj | 8.250 | | 11-01-31 | BBB– | 2,000 | 2,050,460 |
|
Sabine River Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref TXU Energy Co LLC Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2003B | 6.150 | | 08-01-22 | BBB– | 1,000 | 1,078,910 |
Rev Ref TXU Energy Co LLC Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2005C | 5.200 | | 05-01-28 | BBB– | 3,750 | 3,844,463 |
Utah 0.43% | | | | | | 2,084,070 |
|
Mountain Regional Water Special | | | | | | |
Service District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment Spec Imp Dist | | | | | | |
No. 2002-1 (G) | 7.000 | | 12-01-18 | BBB+ | 895 | 913,500 |
|
Salt Lake City Hospital, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref IHC Hosp Inc Ser 1998A | 8.125 | | 05-15-15 | AAA | 1,000 | 1,170,570 |
Virgin Islands 0.21% | | | | | | 1,030,330 |
|
Virgin Islands Water & | | | | | | |
Power Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Wtr Sys | 5.500 | | 07-01-17 | Baa3 | 1,000 | 1,030,330 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
18
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
Virginia 0.53% | | | | | | $2,573,700 |
|
Pocahontas Parkway Association, | | | | | | |
Rev Toll Rd Cap Apprec Sr | | | | | | |
Ser 1998B | Zero | | 08-15-19 | AAA | $5,000 | 2,573,700 |
Washington 1.59% | | | | | | 7,720,722 |
|
Washington Public Power Supply System, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Nuclear Proj No. 1 Ser 1989B | 7.125% | | 07-01-16 | AA– | 1,500 | 1,883,640 |
|
Washington Tobacco | | | | | | |
Settlement Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Asset Backed Bond | 6.500 | | 06-01-26 | BBB | 4,280 | 4,690,452 |
|
Washington, State of, | | | | | | |
Gen Oblig Unltd Ser 1990A | 6.750 | | 02-01-15 | AA | 1,000 | 1,146,630 |
West Virginia 0.68% | | | | | | 3,318,408 |
|
West Virginia State Hospital | | | | | | |
Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Preref Charleston Area Med Ctr | 6.750 | | 09-01-22 | A2 | 2,400 | 2,660,712 |
Rev Unref Bal Charleston Area Med Ctr | 6.750 | | 09-01-22 | A2 | 600 | 657,696 |
Wyoming 0.22% | | | | | | 1,067,630 |
|
Sweetwater, County of, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Solid Waste Disposal FMC | | | | | | |
Corp Proj | 5.600 | | 12-01-35 | BBB– | 1,000 | 1,067,630 |
|
|
| | | | Interest | Par value | |
Issuer, description, maturity date | | | | rate | (000) | Value |
|
Short-term investments 0.03% | | | | | | $164,000 |
(Cost $164,000) | | | | | | |
Joint Repurchase Agreement 0.03% | | | | | | 164,000 |
|
Investment in a joint repurchase | | | | | | |
agreement transaction with | | | | | | |
Cantor Fitzgerald LP — Dated | | | | | | |
2-28-07, due 3-1-07 (Secured by | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury Inflation Indexed | | | | | | |
Notes 1.875% due 7-15-13 and | | | | | | |
2.000% due 7-15-14). Maturity | | | | | | |
value: $164,024 | | | | 5.270% | $164 | 164,000 |
|
|
Total investments (Cost $453,428,730) 102.76% | | | | | $499,569,946 |
|
|
Other assets and liabilities, net (2.76%) | | | | | ($13,399,308) |
|
|
Total net assets 100.00% | | | | | | $486,170,638 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
19
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Notes to Schedule of Investments
(A) Credit ratings are unaudited and are rated by Moody’s Investors Service or Fitch where Standard & Poor’s ratings are not available unless indicated otherwise.
(G) Security rated internally by John Hancock Advisers, LLC.
(H) Non-income-producing issuer filed for protection under the Federal Bankruptcy Code or is in default of interest payment.
(I) Security forms part of an inverse floater trust.
(K) Direct placement securities are restricted to resale. They have been fair valued in accordance with procedures approved by the Trustees after consideration of restrictions as to resale, financial condition and prospects of the issuer, general market conditions and pertinent information in accordance with the Fund’s bylaws and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Fund has limited rights to registration under the Securities Act of 1933 with respect to these restricted securities. Additional information on these securities is as follows.
| | | Value as a | |
| | | percentage | |
| Acquisition | Acquisition | of Fund's | Value as of |
Issuer, description | date | cost | net assets | February 28, 2007 |
|
Puerto Rico Highway & | | | | |
Transportation Auth, | | | | |
Rev Ser PA 114, 8.939%, 07-01-11 | 04-02-96 | $14,925,160 | 3.13% | $15,221,346 |
(N) This security, having an aggregate value of $2,916,400 or 0.60% of the Fund’s net assets, has been purchased on a when-issued basis. The purchase price and the interest rate of such securities are fixed at trade date, although the Fund does not earn any interest on such securities until settlement date. The Fund has instructed its custodian bank to segregate assets with a current value at least equal to the amount of its when-issued commitments. Accordingly, the market value of $2,934,030 of Foothill/Eastern Transportation, 6.000%, 01-01-16 has been segregated to cover the when-issued commitments.
(O) Cash interest will be paid on this obligation at the stated rate beginning on the stated date.
(P) Represents rate in effect on February 28, 2007.
(S) This security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. Such security may be resold, normally to qualified institutional buyers, in transactions exempt from registration. Rule 144A securities amounted to $7,449,120 or 1.53% of the Fund’s net assets as of February 28, 2007.
The percentage shown for each investment category is the total value of that category as a percentage of the net assets of the Fund.
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
20
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Financial statements
Statement of assets and liabilities 2-28-07 (unaudited)
This Statement of Assets and Liabilities is the Fund’s balance sheet. It shows the value of what the Fund owns, is due and owes. You’ll also find the net asset value and the maximum offering price per share.
Assets | |
|
Investments at value (cost $453,428,730) | $499,569,946 |
Cash | 687 |
Receivable for shares sold | 638,452 |
Interest receivable | 5,602,104 |
Other assets | 128,378 |
Total assets | 505,939,567 |
|
Liabilities | |
|
Payable for investments purchased | 8,622,450 |
Payable for shares repurchased | 261,429 |
Interest expense and fees payable on inverse floaters | 75,069 |
Payable for floating rate notes issued | 9,740,000 |
Inverse floater bond swap at value | 533,518 |
Dividends payable | 41,205 |
Payable to affiliates | |
Management fees | 203,371 |
Distribution and service fees | 19,308 |
Other | 52,205 |
Other payables and accrued expenses | 220,374 |
Total liabilities | 19,768,929 |
|
Net assets | |
|
Capital paid-in | 456,103,581 |
Accumulated net realized loss on investments | (16,957,549) |
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | 46,141,216 |
Accumulated net investment income | 883,390 |
Net assets | $486,170,638 |
|
Net asset value per share | |
|
Based on net asset values and shares outstanding — the Fund has an | |
unlimited number of shares authorized with no par value | |
Class A ($459,387,067 ÷ 44,489,653 shares) | $10.33 |
Class B ($19,475,972 ÷ 1,886,139 shares) | $10.33 |
Class C ($7,307,599 ÷ 707,690 shares) | $10.33 |
|
Maximum offering price per share | |
|
Class A1 ($10.33 ÷ 95.5%) | $10.82 |
1 On single retail sales of less than $100,000. On sales of $100,000 or more and on group sales the offering price is reduced.
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
21
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Statement of operations For the period ended 2-28-07 (unaudited)1
This Statement of Operations summarizes the Fund’s investment income earned and expenses incurred in operating the Fund. It also shows net gains (losses) for the period stated.
Investment income | |
|
Interest | $12,966,040 |
Total investment income | 12,966,040 |
|
Expenses | |
|
Investment management fees (Note 2) | 1,321,234 |
Distribution and service fees (Note 2) | 700,507 |
Transfer agent fees (Note 2) | 196,661 |
Accounting and legal services fees (Note 2) | 34,112 |
Compliance fees | 6,437 |
Custodian fees | 53,377 |
Blue sky fees | 28,448 |
Professional fees | 24,981 |
Printing fees | 22,840 |
Trustees’ fees | 10,187 |
Interest expense and fees on inverse floaters | 173,407 |
Miscellaneous | 11,662 |
Total expenses | 2,583,853 |
Less expense reimbursements (Note 2) | (246) |
Net expenses | 2,583,607 |
Net investment income | 10,382,433 |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) | |
|
Net realized gain on investments | 177,982 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 3,774,802 |
Net realized and unrealized gain | 3,952,784 |
Increase in net assets from operations | $14,335,217 |
1 Semiannual period from 9-1-06 through 2-28-07.
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
22
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Statement of changes in net assets
These Statements of Changes in Net Assets show how the value of the Fund’s net assets has changed during the last two periods. The difference reflects earnings less expenses, any investment gains and losses, distributions, if any, paid to shareholders and the net of Fund share transactions.
| Year | Period |
| ended | ended |
| 8-31-06 | 2-28-071 |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | | |
|
From operations | | |
Net investment income | $22,480,152 | $10,382,433 |
Net realized gain | 1,678,301 | 177,982 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | (10,709,007) | 3,774,802 |
Increase in net assets resulting from operations | 13,449,446 | 14,335,217 |
Distributions to shareholders | | |
From net investment income | | |
Class A | (20,941,678) | (9,984,164) |
Class B | (996,292) | (361,874) |
Class C | (257,696) | (124,642) |
| (22,195,666) | (10,470,680) |
From Fund share transactions | (30,486,459) | (4,306,460) |
|
Net assets | | |
|
Beginning of period | 525,845,240 | 486,612,561 |
End of period2 | $486,612,561 | $486,170,638 |
1 Semiannual period from 9-1-06 through 2-28-07. Unaudited.
2 Includes accumulated net investment income of $1,109,270 and $883,390, respectively.
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
23
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Financial highlights
The Financial Highlights show how the Fund’s net asset value for a share has changed since the end of the previous period.
CLASS A SHARES
Period ended | 8-31-021,2 | 8-31-031 | 8-31-041 | 8-31-051 | 8-31-06 | 2-28-073 |
Per share operating performance | | | | | | |
|
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | $10.72 | $10.40 | $9.96 | $10.22 | $10.41 | $10.24 |
Net investment income4 | 0.55 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.22 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | (0.32) | (0.45) | 0.26 | 0.19 | (0.18) | 0.09 |
Total from investment operations | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.75 | 0.67 | 0.29 | 0.31 |
Less distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | (0.54) | (0.52) | (0.49) | (0.48) | (0.46) | (0.22) |
From net realized gain | (0.01) | — | — | — | — | — |
| (0.55) | (0.52) | (0.49) | (0.48) | (0.46) | (0.22) |
Net asset value, end of period | $10.40 | $9.96 | $10.22 | $10.41 | $10.24 | $10.33 |
Total return5,6 (%) | 2.33 | 0.70 | 7.70 | 6.72 | 2.87 | 3.10 7 |
|
Ratios and supplemental data | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period | | | | | | |
(in millions) | $550 | $507 | $492 | $487 | $459 | $459 |
Ratio of net expenses (excluding | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse floaters) | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.968 |
Ratio of net expenses (including | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse floaters) | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | — | — | — | — | — | 1.038 |
Ratio of gross expenses to average | | | | | | |
net assets9 (%) | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 1.038,10 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | 5.34 | 5.11 | 4.87 | 4.71 | 4.54 | 4.378 |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 22 | 23 | 49 | 32 | 54 | 207 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
24
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Financial highlights
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | |
|
Period ended | 8-31-021,2 | 8-31-031 | 8-31-041 | 8-31-051 | 8-31-06 | 2-28-073 |
|
Per share operating performance | | | | | | |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $10.72 | $10.40 | $9.96 | $10.22 | $10.41 | $10.24 |
Net investment income4 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.19 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | (0.32) | (0.45) | 0.26 | 0.18 | (0.18) | 0.09 |
Total from investment operations | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.21 | 0.28 |
Less distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | (0.46) | (0.44) | (0.42) | (0.40) | (0.38) | (0.19) |
From net realized gain | (0.01) | — | — | — | — | — |
| (0.47) | (0.44) | (0.42) | (0.40) | (0.38) | (0.19) |
Net asset value, end of period | $10.40 | $9.96 | $10.22 | $10.41 | $10.24 | $10.33 |
Total return5,6 (%) | 1.57 | (0.05) | 6.89 | 5.93 | 2.10 | 2.727 |
|
Ratios and supplemental data | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period | | | | | | |
(in millions) | $60 | $49 | $39 | $32 | $21 | $19 |
Ratio of net expenses (excluding | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse floaters) | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | 1.71 | 1.72 | 1.72 | 1.74 | 1.71 | 1.718 |
Ratio of net expenses (including | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse floaters) | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | — | — | — | — | — | 1.778 |
Ratio of gross expenses to average | | | | | | |
net assets9 (%) | 1.75 | 1.73 | 1.73 | 1.74 | 1.71 | 1.778,10 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | 4.59 | 4.36 | 4.11 | 3.96 | 3.79 | 3.628 |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 22 | 23 | 49 | 32 | 54 | 207 |
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
25
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Financial highlights
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | |
|
Period ended | 8-31-021,2 | 8-31-031 | 8-31-041 | 8-31-051 | 8-31-06 | 2-28-073 |
Per share operating performance | | | | | | |
|
Net asset value, beginning of period | $10.72 | $10.40 | $9.96 | $10.22 | $10.41 | $10.24 |
Net investment income4 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.19 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | (0.32) | (0.45) | 0.26 | 0.18 | (0.18) | 0.09 |
Total from investment operations | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.21 | 0.28 |
Less distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | (0.46) | (0.44) | (0.42) | (0.40) | (0.38) | (0.19) |
From net realized gain | (0.01) | — | — | — | — | — |
| (0.47) | (0.44) | (0.42) | (0.40) | (0.38) | (0.19) |
Net asset value, end of period | $10.40 | $9.96 | $10.22 | $10.41 | $10.24 | $10.33 |
Total return5,6 (%) | 1.53 | (0.05) | 6.89 | 5.93 | 2.10 | 2.727 |
|
Ratios and supplemental data | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period | | | | | | |
(in millions) | $7 | $8 | $8 | $7 | $7 | $7 |
Ratio of net expenses (excluding | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse floaters) | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | 1.75 | 1.72 | 1.71 | 1.74 | 1.71 | 1.718 |
Ratio of net expenses (including | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse floaters) | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | — | — | — | — | — | 1.778 |
Ratio of gross expenses to average | | | | | | |
net assets9 (%) | 1.75 | 1.73 | 1.72 | 1.74 | 1.71 | 1.778,10 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | 4.55 | 4.35 | 4.11 | 3.96 | 3.79 | 3.628 |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 22 | 23 | 49 | 32 | 54 | 207 |
1 Audited by previous auditor.
2 As required, effective 9-1-01, the Fund has adopted the provisions of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies, as revised, relating to the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on debt securities. The effect of this change on per share amounts for the year ended 8-31-02 was to increase net investment income per share by $0.01, increase net realized and unrealized losses per share by $0.01 and, had the Fund not made these changes to amortization and accretion, the ratio of net investment income to average net assets would have been 5.23%, 4.48% and 4.44% for Class A, Class B and Class C shares, respectively. Per share ratios and supplemental data for periods prior to 9-1-01 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation.
3 Semiannual period from 9-1-06 through 2-28-07. Unaudited.
4 Based on the average of the shares outstanding.
5 Assumes dividend reinvestment and does not reflect the effect of sales charges.
6 Total returns would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced during the periods shown.
7 Not annualized.
8 Annualized.
9 Does not take into consideration expense reductions during the periods shown.
10 Includes interest expense on inverse floaters.
See notes to financial statements
Tax-Free Bond Fund
26
Notes to financial statements (unaudited)
Note 1 Accounting policies
John Hancock Tax-Free Bond Fund (the “Fund”) is a diversified series of John Hancock Municipal Securities Trust (the “Trust”), an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), as amended. The investment objective of the Fund is to provide as high a level of interest income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with preservation of capital.
The Trustees have authorized the issuance of multiple classes of shares of the Fund, designated as Class A, Class B and Class C shares. The shares of each class represent an interest in the same portfolio of investments of the Fund and have equal rights as to voting, redemptions, dividends and liquidation, except that certain expenses, subject to the approval of the Trustees, may be applied differently to each class of shares in accordance with current regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Internal Revenue Service. Shareholders of a class that bears distribution and service expenses under the terms of a distribution plan have exclusive voting rights to that distribution plan. Class B shares will convert to Class A shares eight years after purchase.
Significant accounting policies of the Fund are as follows:
Valuation of investments
Securities in the Fund’s portfolio are valued on the basis of market quotations, valuations provided by independent pricing services or at fair value as determined in good faith in accordance with procedures approved by the Trustees. Short-term debt investments which have a remaining maturity of 60 days or less may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.
Joint repurchase agreement
Pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the SEC, the Fund, along with other registered investment companies having a management contract with John Hancock Advisers, LLC (the “Adviser”), a wholly owned subsidiary of John Hancock Financial Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Manulife Financial Corporation (“MFC”), may participate in a joint repurchase agreement transaction. Aggregate cash balances are invested in one or more large repurchase agreements, whose underlying securities are obligations of the U.S. government and/or its agencies. The Fund’s custodian bank receives delivery of the underlying securities for the joint account on the Fund’s behalf. The Adviser is responsible for ensuring that the agreement is fully collateralized at all times.
Investment transactions
Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date plus one basis for daily net asset value calculations. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are reported on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on sales of investments are determined on the identified cost basis.
Discount and premium on securities
The Fund accretes discount and amortizes premium from par value on securities from either the date of issue or the date of purchase over the life of the security.
Class allocations
Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains (losses) are determined at the fund level and allocated daily to each class of shares based on the appropriate net asset value of the respective classes. Distribution and service fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net asset value of each class and the specific expense rate(s) applicable to each class.
Tax-Free Bond Fund
27
Expenses
The majority of expenses are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses that are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated in such a manner as deemed equitable, taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
Bank borrowings
The Fund is permitted to have bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, including the meeting of redemption requests that otherwise might require the untimely disposition of securities. The Fund has entered into a syndicated line of credit agreement with various banks. This agreement enables the Fund to participate, with other funds managed by the Adviser, in an unsecured line of credit with banks, which permits borrowings of up to $150 million, collectively. Interest is charged to each fund based on its borrowing. In addition, a commitment fee is charged to each fund based on the average daily unused portion of the line of credit, and is allocated among the participating funds. The Fund had no borrowing activity under the line of credit during the period ended February 28, 2007.
Inverse floaters
Inverse floating rate notes are debt instruments with a floating rate of interest that bears an inverse relationship to changes in short-term market interest rates. Investments in this type of instrument involve special risks as compared to investments in a fixed rate municipal security. The debt instrument in which the Fund may invest is a tender option bond trust (the “trust”) which can be established by the Fund, a financial institution, or broker, consisting of underlying municipal obligations with intermediate to long maturities and a fixed interest rate. Other investors in the trust usually consist of money market fund investors receiving weekly floating interest rate payments who have put options with the financial institutions. The Fund may enter into shortfall and forebearance agreements by which a Fund agrees to reimburse the trust, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the fixed rate municipal security held by the trust and the liquidation value of the floating rate notes. The Fund has the price risk of the underlying municipal obligations at the applicable leverage factor. Certain inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund have been created with bonds purchased by the Fund and subsequently transferred to the trust. These transactions are considered a form of financing for accounting purposes. As a result, the Fund includes the original transferred bond and a corresponding liability equal to the floating rate note issued. In addition, when the original transferred bond value and the floating rate note value are disproportionate, the Fund processes a bond swap transaction for the difference in value. The Fund does not consider the Fund’s investment in inverse floaters borrowing within the meaning of the 1940 Act, as amended. Inverse floating rate notes exhibit added interest rate sensitivity compared to other bonds with a similar maturity. Moreover, since these securities are in a trust form, a sale may take longer to settle then the standard two days after trade date.
The weighted average outstanding daily balance of the floating rate notes issued during the period ended February 28, 2007 was approximately $9,740,000 with a weighted average interest rate of 3.56% .
Federal income taxes
The Fund qualifies as a “regulated investment company” by complying with the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is distributed to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. For federal income tax purposes, the Fund has $14,285,644 of a capital loss carryforward available, to the extent provided by regulations, to offset future net realized capital gains. To the extent that such carryforward is used by the Fund, no capital gain distributions will be made. The loss carryforward expires as follows: August 31, 2011 — $7,448,026 and August 31, 2012 — $6,837,618.
New accounting pronouncements
In June 2006, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (the “Interpretation”) was issued, and is effective
Tax-Free Bond Fund
28
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. The Interpretation prescribes a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and requires certain expanded disclosures. Management is currently evaluating the application of the Interpretation to the Fund and has not at this time quantified the impact, if any, resulting from the adoption of the Interpretation on the Fund’s financial statements. The Fund will implement this pronouncement no later than February 28, 2008.
In September 2006, FASB Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS 157”) was issued, and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. FAS 157 defines fair value, establishing a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Management is currently evaluating the application of FAS 157 to the Fund and its impact, if any, resulting from the adoption of FAS 157 on the Fund’s financial statements.
Interest and distributions
Interest income on investment securities is recorded on the accrual basis. The Fund may place a debt obligation on non-accrual status and reduce related interest income by ceasing current accruals and/or writing off interest receivables when the collection of interest has become doubtful.
The Fund records distributions to shareholders from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, on the ex-dividend date. The Fund’s net investment income is declared daily as dividends to shareholders of record as of the close of business on the preceding day and distributed monthly. During the year ended August 31, 2006, the tax character of distributions paid was as follows: ordinary income $9,602 and exempt income $22,186,064. Distributions paid by the Fund with respect to each class of shares are calculated in the same manner, at the same time and are in the same amount, except for the effect of expenses that may be applied differently to each class. Such distributions, on a tax basis, are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits, if any, are reported in the Fund’s financial statements as a return of capital.
Use of estimates
The preparation of these financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, incorporates estimates made by management in determining the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Fund. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Note 2
Management fee and transactions with affiliates and others
The Fund has an investment management contract with the Adviser. Under the investment management contract, the Fund pays a monthly management fee to the Adviser equivalent, on an annual basis, to the sum of: (a) 0.55% of the first $500,000,000 of the Fund’s average daily net asset value, (b) 0.50% of the next $500,000,000 and (c) 0.45% of the Fund’s average daily net assets in excess of $1,000,000,000.
Effective December 31, 2005, the investment management teams of the Adviser were reorganized into Sovereign Asset Management LLC (“Sovereign”), a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of John Hancock Life Insurance Company (“JHLICO”), a subsidiary of MFC. The Adviser remains the principal advisor on the Fund and Sovereign acts as subadviser under the supervision of the Adviser. The restructuring did not have an impact on the Fund, which continues to be managed using the same investment philosophy and process. The Fund is not responsible for payment of the subadvisory fees.
Effective October 1, 2006, Sovereign changed its name to MFC Global Investment Management (U.S.), LLC.
Tax-Free Bond Fund
29
The Fund has an agreement with its custodian bank, under which custody fees are reduced by balance credits applied during the period. Accordingly, the expense reductions related to custody fee offsets amounted to $246, which had no impact on the Fund’s ratio of expenses to average net assets, for the period ended February 28, 2007. If the Fund had not entered into this agreement, the assets not invested, on which these balance credits were earned, could have produced taxable income.
The Fund has a Distribution Plan with John Hancock Funds, LLC (“JH Funds”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Adviser. The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans with respect to Class A, Class B and Class C, pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, as amended, to reimburse JH Funds for the services it provides as distributor of shares of the Fund. Accordingly, the Fund makes monthly payments to JH Funds at an annual rate not to exceed 0.25% of Class A average daily net asset value and 1.00% of Class B and Class C average daily net asset value. A maximum of 0.25% of such payments may be service fees, as defined by the Conduct Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers. Under the Conduct Rules, curtailment of a portion of the Fund’s 12b-1 payments could occur under certain circumstances.
Expenses under the agreements described above for the period ended February 28, 2007, were as follows:
| Distribution and |
Share class | service fees |
|
Class A | $567,246 |
Class B | 99,136 |
Class C | 34,125 |
Total | $700,507 |
Class A shares are assessed up-front sales charges. During the period ended February 28, 2007, JH Funds received net up-front sales charges of $136,278 with regard to sales of Class A shares. Of this amount, $16,624 was retained and used for printing prospectuses, advertising, sales literature and other purposes, $79,737 was paid as sales commissions to unrelated broker-dealers and $39,917 was paid as sales commissions to sales personnel of Signator Investors, Inc. (“Signator Investors”), a related broker-dealer. The Adviser’s indirect parent, JHLICO, is the indirect sole shareholder of Signator Investors.
Class B shares that are redeemed within six years of purchase are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) at declining rates, beginning at 5.00% of the lesser of the current market value at the time of redemption or the original purchase cost of the shares being redeemed. Class C shares that are redeemed within one year of purchase are subject to a CDSC at a rate of 1.00% of the lesser of the current market value at the time of redemption or the original purchase cost of the shares being redeemed. Proceeds from the CDSCs are paid to JH Funds and are used, in whole or in part, to defray its expenses for providing distribution-related services to the Fund in connection with the sale of Class B and Class C shares. During the period ended February 28, 2007, CDSCs received by JH Funds amounted to $7,396 for Class B shares and $1,273 for Class C shares.
The Fund has a transfer agent agreement with John Hancock Signature Services, Inc. (“Signature Services”), an indirect subsidiary of JHLICO. The Fund pays a monthly transfer agent fee at an annual rate of 0.01% of each class’s average daily net asset value, plus a fee based on the number of shareholder accounts and reimbursement for certain out-of-pocket expenses, aggregated and allocated to each class on the basis of its relative net asset value.
The Fund has an agreement with the Adviser and affiliates to perform necessary tax, accounting and legal services for the Fund. The compensation for the year amounted to $34,112. The Fund also reimbursed JHLICO for certain compliance costs, included in the Fund’s Statement of Operations.
Mr. James R. Boyle is Chairman of the Adviser, as well as affiliated Trustee of the Fund, and is compensated by the Adviser and/or its affiliates. The compensation of unaffiliated Trustees is borne by the Fund. The unaffiliated Trustees may elect to defer, for tax purposes, their receipt of this compensation under the John Hancock Group of Funds
Tax-Free Bond Fund
30
Deferred Compensation Plan. The Fund makes investments into other John Hancock funds, as applicable, to cover its liability for the deferred compensation. Investments to cover the Fund’s deferred compensation liability are recorded on the Fund’s books as an other asset. The deferred compensation liability and the related other asset are always equal and are marked to market on a periodic basis to reflect any income earned by the investments, as well as any unrealized gains or losses. The Deferred Compensation Plan investments had no impact on the operations of the Fund.
Note 3
Fund share transactions
This listing illustrates the number of Fund shares sold, reinvested and repurchased during the last two periods, along with the corresponding dollar value.
| Year ended 8-31-06 | Period ended 2-28-071 |
| Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount |
|
Class A shares | | | | |
Sold | 1,861,129 | $18,966,133 | 1,040,290 | $10,701,051 |
Distributions reinvested | 1,508,631 | 15,340,181 | 708,270 | 7,293,360 |
Repurchased | (5,383,092) | (54,695,701) | (2,037,951) | (20,967,816) |
Net decrease | (2,013,332) | ($20,389,387) | (289,391) | ($2,973,405) |
|
|
Class B shares | | | | |
Sold | 141,572 | $1,439,691 | 72,526 | $742,546 |
Distributions reinvested | 60,914 | 619,608 | 21,884 | 225,346 |
Repurchased | (1,188,247) | (12,065,904) | (263,463) | (2,709,118) |
Net decrease | (985,761) | ($10,006,605) | (169,053) | ($1,741,226) |
|
|
Class C shares | | | | |
Sold | 117,502 | $1,193,676 | 101,726 | $1,045,060 |
Distributions reinvested | 15,167 | 154,219 | 7,185 | 73,994 |
Repurchased | (141,820) | (1,438,362) | (68,940) | (710,883) |
Net increase (decrease) | (9,151) | ($90,467) | 39,971 | $408,171 |
|
|
Net decrease | (3,008,244) | ($30,486,459) | (418,473) | ($4,306,460) |
1 Semiannual period from 9-1-06 through 2-28-07. Unaudited.
Note 4
Investment transactions
Purchases and proceeds from sales or maturities of securities, other than short-term securities and obligations of the U.S. government, during the period ended February 28, 2007, aggregated $97,707,289 and $94,908,128, respectively.
The cost of investments owned on February 28, 2007, including short-term investments, for federal income tax purposes, was $441,803,002. Gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments aggregated $49,304,540 and $1,811,114, respectively, resulting in net unrealized appreciation of $47,493,426. The difference between book basis and tax basis net unrealized appreciation of investments is attributable primarily to the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on debt securities.
Tax-Free Bond Fund
31
Board Consideration of and Continuation of Investment Advisory Agreement and Subadvisory Agreement: John Hancock Tax-Free Bond Fund
The Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) requires the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of John Hancock Municipal Securities Trust (the “Trust”), including a majority of the Trustees who have no direct or indirect interest in the investment advisory agreement and are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), annually to review and consider the continuation of: (i) the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) with John Hancock Advisers, LLC (the “Adviser”) and (ii) the investment subadvisory agreement (the “Subadvisory Agreement”) with Sovereign Asset Management LLC (the “Subadviser”) for the John Hancock Tax-Free Bond Fund (the “Fund”). The Advisory Agreement and the Subadvisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreements.”
At meetings held on May 1–2 and June 5–6, 2006,1 the Board considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of the Adviser and Subadviser and the continuation of the Advisory Agreements. During such meetings, the Board’s Contracts/Operations Committee and the Independent Trustees also met in executive sessions with their independent legal counsel.
In evaluating the Advisory Agreements, the Board, including the Contracts/Operations Committee and the Independent Trustees, reviewed a broad range of information requested for this purpose by the Independent Trustees, including: (i) the investment performance of the Fund relative to a category of relevant funds (the “Category”) and a peer group of comparable funds (the “Peer Group”) each selected by Morningstar Inc. (“Morningstar”), an independent provider of investment company data, for a range of periods ended December 31, 2005; (ii) advisory and other fees incurred by, and the expense ratios of, the Fund relative to a Category and a Peer Group; (iii) the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of the Adviser and the Subadviser; (iv) the Adviser’s financial results and condition including its and certain of its affiliates’ profitability from services performed for the Fund; (v) brea kpoints in the Fund’s and the Peer Group’s fees, and information about economies of scale; (vi) the Adviser’s and Subadviser’s record of compliance with applicable laws and regulations with the Fund’s investment policies and restrictions and with the applicable Code of Ethics, and the structure and responsibilities of the Adviser’s and Subadviser’s compliance department; (vii) the background and experience of senior management and investment professionals and (viii) the nature, cost and character of advisory and non-investment management services provided by the Adviser and its affiliates and by the Subadviser.
The Board’s review and conclusions were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information presented to the Board and not the result of any single controlling factor. It was based on performance and other information as of December 31, 2005; facts may have changed between that date and the date of this shareholders report. The key factors considered by the Board and the conclusions reached are described below.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Board considered the ability of the Adviser and the Subadviser, based on their resources, reputation and other attributes, to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel. The Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of the Adviser and Subadviser. In addition, the Board took into account the administrative services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates.
Based on the above factors, together with those referenced below, the Board concluded that, within the context of its full deliberations, the nature, extent and quality of the investment advisory services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and Subadviser were sufficient to support renewal of the Advisory Agreements.
32
Fund performance
The Board considered the performance results for the Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2005. The Board also considered these results in comparison to the performance of the Category, as well as the Fund’s benchmark index. Morningstar determined the Category and Peer Group for the Fund. The Board reviewed with a representative of Morningstar the methodology used by Morningstar to select the funds in the Category and the Peer Group.
The Board noted that the Fund’s performance during the periods under review was generally competitive with the performance of the Peer Group and Category medians, and its benchmark index, the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index. The Board noted that, for the 5- and 10-year periods under review, the Fund’s performance was lower than the performance of the Peer Group and Category medians, and the performance of the benchmark index. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance during the 3-year period under review was higher than the performance of the Category median and benchmark index and lower than the performance of the Peer Group median. The Board viewed favorably that the more recent performance of the Fund for the 1-year period ended December 31, 2005 was higher than the Peer Group and Category medians, and its benchmark index.
Investment advisory fee and subadvisory fee rates and expenses
The Board reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate payable by the Fund to the Adviser for investment advisory services (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Board received and considered information comparing the Advisory Agreement Rate with the advisory fees for the Peer Group and Category. The Board noted that the Advisory Agreement Rate was not appreciably higher than the median rate of the Peer Group and Category.
The Board received and considered expense information regarding the Fund’s various components, including advisory fees, distribution fees and fees other than advisory and distribution fees, including transfer agent fees, custodian fees and other miscellaneous fees (e.g., fees for accounting and legal services). The Board considered comparisons of these expenses to the Peer Group median. The Board also received and considered expense information regarding the Fund’s total operating expense ratio (“Expense Ratio”). The Board received and considered information comparing the Expense Ratio of the Fund to that of the Category and Peer Group medians. The Board noted that the Fund’s Expense Ratio was higher than the Category and Peer Group medians.
The Adviser also discussed the Morningstar data and rankings, and other relevant information, for the Fund. Based on the above-referenced considerations and other factors, the Board concluded that the Fund’s overall expense results and performance supported the re-approval of the Advisory Agreements.
The Board also received information about the investment sub-advisory fee rate (the “Subadvisory Agreement Rate”) payable by the Adviser to the Subadviser for investment sub-advisory services. The Board concluded that the Subadvisory Agreement Rate was fair and equitable, based on its consideration of the factors described here.
Profitability
The Board received and considered a detailed profitability analysis of the Adviser based on the Advisory Agreements, as well as on other relationships between the Fund and the Adviser and its affiliates, including the Subadviser. The Board concluded that, in light of the costs of providing investment management and other services to the Fund, the profits and other ancillary benefits reported by the Adviser were not unreasonable.
Economies of scale
The Board received and considered general information regarding economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund, including the Fund’s ability to appropriately benefit from economies of scale under the Fund’s fee structure. The Board recognized the inherent limitations of any analysis of economies of scale, stemming largely from the Board’s understanding that most of the
33
Adviser’s costs are not specific to individual Funds, but rather are incurred across a variety of products and services.
To the extent the Board and the Adviser were able to identify actual or potential economies of scale from Fund-specific or allocated expenses, in order to ensure that any such economies continue to be reasonably shared with the Fund as its assets increase, the Adviser and the Board agreed to continue the existing breakpoints to the Advisory Agreement Rate.
Information about services to other clients
The Board also received information about the nature, extent and quality of services and fee rates offered by the Adviser and Subadviser to their other clients, including other registered investment companies, institutional investors and separate accounts. The Board concluded that the Advisory Agreement Rate and the Subadvisory Agreement Rate were not unreasonable, taking into account fee rates offered to others by the Adviser and Subadviser, respectively, after giving effect to differences in services.
Other benefits to the Adviser
The Board received information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser’s relationship with the Fund. Such benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to the relationship of the Adviser with the Fund and benefits potentially derived from an increase in the business of the Adviser as a result of its relationship with the Fund (such as the ability to market to shareholders other financial products offered by the Adviser and its affiliates).
The Board also considered the effectiveness of the Adviser’s, Subadviser’s and Fund’s policies and procedures for complying with the requirements of the federal securities laws, including those relating to best execution of portfolio transactions and brokerage allocation.
Other factors and broader review
As discussed above, the Board reviewed detailed materials received from the Adviser and Subadviser as part of the annual re-approval process. The Board also regularly reviews and assesses the quality of the services that the Fund receives throughout the year. In this regard, the Board reviews reports of the Adviser at least quarterly, which include, among other things, a detailed portfolio review, detailed fund performance reports and compliance reports. In addition, the Board meets with portfolio managers and senior investment officers at various times throughout the year.
After considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board concluded that approval of the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for the Fund was in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders. Accordingly, the Board unanimously approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
1 The Board previously considered information about the Subadvisory Agreement at the September and December 2005 Board meetings in connection with the Adviser’s reorganization.
34
For more information
The Fund’s proxy voting policies, procedures and records are available without charge, upon request:
By phone | On the Fund’s Web site | On the SEC’s Web site |
1-800-225-5291 | www.jhfunds.com/proxy | www.sec.gov |
|
|
Trustees | Francis V. Knox, Jr. | Custodian |
Ronald R. Dion, Chairman | Chief Compliance Officer | The Bank of New York |
James R. Boyle† | Gordon M. Shone | One Wall Street |
James F. Carlin | Treasurer | New York, NY 10286 |
Richard P. Chapman, Jr.* | John G. Vrysen | |
William H. Cunningham | Chief Financial Officer | Transfer agent |
Charles L. Ladner* | | John Hancock Signature |
Dr. John A. Moore* | Investment adviser | Services, Inc. |
Patti McGill Peterson* | John Hancock Advisers, LLC | 1 John Hancock Way, |
Steven R. Pruchansky | 601 Congress Street | Suite 1000 |
*Members of the Audit Committee | Boston, MA 02210-2805 | Boston, MA 02217-1000 |
†Non-Independent Trustee | | |
| Subadviser | Legal counsel |
Officers | MFC Global Investment | Kirkpatrick & Lockhart |
Keith F. Hartstein | Management (U.S.), LLC | Preston Gates Ellis LLP |
President and | 101 Huntington Avenue | 1 Lincoln Street |
Chief Executive Officer | Boston, MA 02199 | Boston, MA 02110-2950 |
Thomas M. Kinzler | | |
Secretary and | Principal distributor | |
Chief Legal Officer | John Hancock Funds, LLC | |
| 601 Congress Street | |
| Boston, MA 02210-2805 | |
The Fund’s investment objective, risks, charges and expenses are included in the prospectus and should be considered carefully before investing. For a prospectus, call your financial professional, call John Hancock Funds at 1-800-225-5291 or visit the Fund’s Web site at www.jhfunds.com. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.
How to contact us | |
|
|
Internet | www.jhfunds.com | |
|
|
Mail | Regular mail: | Express mail: |
| John Hancock | John Hancock |
| Signature Services, Inc. | Signature Services, Inc. |
| 1 John Hancock Way, Suite 1000 | Mutual Fund Image Operations |
| Boston, MA 02217-1000 | 380 Stuart Street |
| | Boston, MA 02116 |
|
|
Phone | Customer service representatives | 1-800-225-5291 |
| EASI-Line | 1-800-338-8080 |
| TDD line | 1-800-554-6713 |
A listing of month-end portfolio holdings is available on our Web site, www.jhfunds.com. A more detailed portfolio holdings summary is available on a quarterly basis 60 days after the fiscal quarter on our Web site or upon request by calling 1-800-225-5291, or on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Web site, www.sec.gov.
36
J O H N H A N C O C K F A M I L Y O F F U N D S
EQUITY | INTERNATIONAL |
Balanced Fund | Greater China Opportunities Fund |
Classic Value Fund | International Allocation Portfolio |
Classic Value Fund II | International Classic Value Fund |
Classic Value Mega Cap Fund | International Core Fund |
Core Equity Fund | International Fund |
Focused Equity Fund | International Growth Fund |
Global Shareholder Yield Fund | |
Growth Fund | INCOME |
Growth Opportunities Fund | Bond Fund |
Growth Trends Fund | Government Income Fund |
Intrinsic Value Fund | High Yield Fund |
Large Cap Equity Fund | Investment Grade Bond Fund |
Large Cap Select Fund | Strategic Income Fund |
Mid Cap Equity Fund | |
Mid Cap Growth Fund | TAX-FREE INCOME |
Multi Cap Growth Fund | California Tax-Free Income Fund |
Small Cap Equity Fund | High Yield Municipal Bond Fund |
Small Cap Fund | Massachusetts Tax-Free Income Fund |
Small Cap Intrinsic Value Fund | New York Tax-Free Income Fund |
Sovereign Investors Fund | Tax-Free Bond Fund |
U.S. Core Fund | |
U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund | MONEY MARKET |
Value Opportunities Fund | Money Market Fund |
| U.S. Government Cash Reserve |
ASSET ALLOCATION | |
Allocation Core Portfolio | CLOSED-END |
Allocation Growth + Value Portfolio | Bank and Thrift Opportunity Fund |
Lifecycle 2010 Portfolio | Financial Trends Fund, Inc. |
Lifecycle 2015 Portfolio | Income Securities Trust |
Lifecycle 2020 Portfolio | Investors Trust |
Lifecycle 2025 Portfolio | Patriot Global Dividend Fund |
Lifecycle 2030 Portfolio | Patriot Preferred Dividend Fund |
Lifecycle 2035 Portfolio | Patriot Premium Dividend Fund I |
Lifecycle 2040 Portfolio | Patriot Premium Dividend Fund II |
Lifecycle 2045 Portfolio | Patriot Select Dividend Trust |
Lifecycle Retirement Portfolio | Preferred Income Fund |
Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio | Preferred Income II Fund |
Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio | Preferred Income III Fund |
Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund |
Lifestyle Growth Portfolio | |
Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio | |
|
SECTOR | |
Financial Industries Fund | |
Health Sciences Fund | |
Real Estate Fund | |
Regional Bank Fund | |
Technology Fund | |
Technology Leaders Fund | |
For more complete information on any John Hancock Fund and an Open-End fund prospectus, which includes charges and expenses, call your financial professional, or John Hancock Funds at 1-800-225-5291 for Open-End fund information and 1-800-852-0218 for Closed-End fund information. Please read the Open-End fund prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17604/17604858a522599c8611fcaf07471e49f81d4428" alt=""
1-800-225-5291
1-800-554-6713 TDD
1-800-338-8080 EASI-Line
www.jhfunds.com
Now available: electronic delivery
www.jhfunds.com/edelivery
This report is for the information of the shareholders of John Hancock Tax-Free Bond Fund.
520SA 2/07
4/07
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b3d6/0b3d6a2fe66a14e8680f320fd4b6e052b4b36493" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1439d/1439df16bfe7c2e49fa640f2ccabd80d98faaa74" alt=""
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
Your fund at a glance |
page 1 |
|
Managers’ report |
page 2 |
|
A look at performance |
page 6 |
|
Your expenses |
page 8 |
|
Fund’s investments |
page 10 |
|
Financial statements |
page 16 |
|
Notes to financial |
statements |
page 22 |
|
For more information |
page 32 |
|
CEO corner
To Our Shareholders,
The U.S. financial markets turned in strong results over the last six months, as earlier concerns of rising inflation, a housing slowdown and high energy prices gave way to news of slower, but still resilient, economic growth, stronger than expected corporate earnings and dampened inflation fears and energy costs. This environment also led the Federal Reserve Board to hold short-term interest rates steady. Even with a sharp decline in the last days of the period, the broad stock market returned 8.93% for the six months ended February 28, 2007, as measured by the S&P 500 Index. With interest rates remaining relatively steady, fixed-income securities also produced positive results.
But after a remarkably long period of calm, the financial markets were rocked at the end of the period by a dramatic sell-off in China’s stock market, which had ripple effects on financial markets worldwide. In the United States, for example, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had its steepest one-day percentage decline in nearly four years on February 27, 2007. The event served to jog investors out of their seemingly casual attitude toward risk and remind them of the simple fact that stock markets move in two directions — down as well as up.
It was also a good occasion to bring to mind several important investment principles that we believe are at the foundation of successful investing. First, keep a long-term approach to investing, avoiding emotional reactions to daily market moves. Second, maintain a well-diversified portfolio that is appropriate for your goals, risk profile and time horizons.
After the market’s moves of the last six months, we encourage investors to sit back, take stock and set some realistic expectations. While history bodes well for the market in 2007 (since 1939, the S&P 500 Index has always produced positive results in the third year of a presidential term), there are no guarantees, and opinions are divided on the future of this more-than-four-year-old bull market. The recent downturn bolsters this uncertainty, although we believe it was a healthy correction for which we were overdue.
The latest events could also be a wake-up call to contact your financial professional to determine whether changes are in order to your investment mix. Some asset groups have had long runs of outperformance. Others had truly outsized returns in 2006. These trends argue for a look to determine if these categories now represent a larger stake in your portfolios than prudent diversification would suggest they should. After all, we believe investors with a well-balanced portfolio and a marathon — not a sprint — approach to investing, stand a better chance of weathering the market’s short-term twists and turns and reaching their long-term goals.
Sincerely,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8f6c/c8f6c4e26afd09551785dc548fab1b2d8cd2726d" alt=""
Keith F. Hartstein,
President and Chief Executive Officer
This commentary reflects the CEO’s views as of February 28, 2007. They are subject to change at any time.
Your fund at a glance
The Fund seeks a high level of current income that is largely exempt from federal income tax, consistent with preservation of capital, by normally investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds of any maturity with credit ratings from A to BB/Ba and their unrated equivalents.
Over the last six months
► Municipal bonds posted positive results, and high-yield municipals outperformed their investment-grade counterparts.
► The Fund’s return trailed its peer group average but surpassed the performance of its benchmark index.
► Transportation and tobacco bonds were the best performers in the portfolio, while higher-quality bonds lagged.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/515fe/515fe197ae06d1697d2f06505106afbc46d26152" alt=""
Top 10 issuers | |
| |
Atlanta, City of, 11-1-19, 6.955% | 5.7% |
|
Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor Agency, 1-1-18, Zero | 5.1% |
|
Puerto Rico, Commonwealth of, 7-1-18, 6.130% | 4.0% |
|
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities Auth,12-15-31, 9.200% | 3.1% |
|
San Bernardino, County of, 8-1-17, 5.500% | 2.8% |
|
Pocahontas Parkway Association, 8-15-19, Zero | 2.6% |
|
Gulf Coast Industrial Development Auth, 4-1-28, 8.000% | 2.4% |
|
Capital Projects Finance Auth, 8-15-31, 7.850% | 2.3% |
|
Chicago, City of, 6-1-22, 6.750% | 2.2% |
|
Midtown Miami Community Development District, 5-1-24, 6.000% | 2.2% |
|
As a percentage of net assets on February 28, 2007.
1
Managers’ report
John Hancock
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
Municipal bonds gained ground for the six months ended February 28, 2007, although they trailed the taxable bond market. The Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index returned 2.89%, while the Lehman Brothers Aggregate Bond Index — a broad measure of the taxable bond market — returned 3.66%.
The modest gains in the municipal bond market masked an increase in volatility during the six-month period as investors reacted to changing economic conditions. Since the beginning of 2006, the U.S. economy has gradually slowed, led by a noteworthy decline in the housing market. However, sporadic signs of economic resiliency created some uncertainty regarding the underlying strength of the economy. As a result, economic reports over the last few months of the period had a magnified effect, causing greater fluctuations in the municipal bond market.
Inflation remained generally under control during the period, thanks largely to a 10% decline in energy prices. The combination of slowing economic growth and benign inflation led the Federal Reserve to hold short-term interest rates steady throughout the six-month period, after raising rates 17 times between June 2004 and June 2006. Consequently, the municipal yield curve remained flat, with short- and long-term bond yields nearly equal.
Municipal bond issuance, which had been relatively low for much of 2006, rose sharply in late 2006 and early 2007. Nonetheless, the increase in supply had little impact on municipal bond performance as
SCORECARD
INVESTMENT | | PERIOD’S PERFORMANCE ... AND WHAT’S BEHIND THE NUMBERS |
| | |
Tobacco bonds | ▲ | Demand for yield provided a lift |
| | |
Airline bonds | ▲ | Also benefited from their relatively high yields, as well as improving |
| | industry fundamentals |
| | |
Health care bonds | ▼ | Heavy new issue supply hurts performance |
2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d21e5/d21e53bcb0bbeacf23b0f6f06ae1bc9a04e003ed" alt=""
Portfolio Managers, MFC Global Investment Management (U.S.) LLC
Dianne Sales, CFA, and Frank A. Lucibella, CFA
strong investor demand helped absorb the new issues.
“The modest gains in the municipal
bond market masked an increase
in volatility during the six-month
period as investors reacted to
changing economic conditions.”
Credit environment
Over the past six months, municipal credit quality remained stable overall. Economic growth, though moderating, was robust enough to sustain solid tax revenues for many state and local governments. The most recent estimates indicate that personal and corporate income tax revenues have been better than expected, while sales tax revenues are slightly below forecasts. However, final tax revenue figures for 2006 won’t be available until June, after April’s tax receipts are tallied.
Fund performance
For the six months ended February 28, 2007, John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund’s Class A, Class B and Class C shares posted total returns of 3.41%, 3.03% and 3.03%, respectively, at net asset value. By comparison, the average return of Morningstar’s High Yield Muni Fund category was 3.61% 1 and the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index returned 2.89% . Keep in mind that your net asset value return will be different from the Fund’s performance if you were not invested in the Fund for the entire period or did not reinvest all distributions. See pages six and seven for historical performance information.
Transportation, tobacco bonds fared best
High-yield municipal bonds outperformed the investment-grade segment of the municipal market during the six-month period. Strong demand for the higher yields of lower-rated bonds contributed to their outperformance.
Transportation bonds — one of the bigger sector weightings in the Fund — performed well during the period. Within the portfolio’s transportation
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
3
holdings, airline-related bonds, such as those financing the construction of a British Airways terminal at John F. Kennedy Airport in New York City, posted the best results.
Another segment of the portfolio that outperformed during the six-month period was tobacco bonds, which are backed by the proceeds from a legal settlement between 46 states and the major tobacco companies. As of February 28, 2007, the Fund held tobacco-related bonds issued by three states — Alaska, New Jersey and Washington.
Positioning for a steeper yield curve
During the period, we increased our exposure to intermediate-term bonds (particularly those maturing in five to ten years). This positioning tends to perform well when the yield curve grows increasingly steep; that is, when the gap between short- and long-term yields widens.
As we mentioned before, the yield curve remained relatively flat during the period, so this positioning did not pay off, but it did provide net asset value stability during this period of volatility. We expect to see a steeper municipal yield curve and a return to a more typical relationship between short- and long-term municipal bond yields at some point in the future.
Event risk
An increasing concern for investors in the taxable corporate bond market is “event” risk, which is the potential for an unexpected event — such as a leveraged buy-out or bankruptcy — to have an adverse impact on the value or credit rating of a corporate bond. This type of event risk can have an impact on the municipal bond market as well, though to a lesser extent.
SECTOR DISTRIBUTION2 |
General obligation | |
bonds | 10% |
Revenue bonds | |
Health | 15% |
Special tax | 10% |
Transportation | 8% |
Pollution | 6% |
Industrial development | 5% |
Housing | 2% |
Tobacco | 2% |
Education | 2% |
Water & sewer | 1% |
Economic development | 1% |
All other | 38% |
A recent example is the decline in the housing market and the subsequent bankruptcies of several sub-prime mortgage lenders, which could potentially impact municipal bonds related to housing and property development by slowing development. We have been very careful about the land-development bonds in which we invest, emphasizing seasoned projects that are already well developed. These securities are less vulnerable to housing market weakness.
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
4
Temporary Fund closing
The Fund was closed to new sales for several months during the reporting period in connection with a requirement to review the Fund’s financial statements to ensure appropriate presentation of investments in securities known as “inverse floaters.” The Fund reopened shortly after the period ended. Results of the review showed the impact on the Fund’s financial statements was immaterial and did not require a restatement.
“Transportation bonds — one of
the biggest sector weightings
in the Fund — performed well
during the period.”
Outlook
The U.S. economy has held up better than expected, although further slowing is likely. In general, however, we expect municipal credit quality and state tax revenues to remain fairly stable over the next six months. New municipal bond issuance in 2007 is expected to be in line with last year’s issuance levels.
High-yield municipal bonds have outperformed investment-grade municipal bonds over the past few years, largely because of healthy investor demand for yield. With the yield spread between high-yield and investment-grade municipal bonds at historically narrow levels, it will be difficult for the high yield segment to sustain its outperformance.
With regard to the Fund, we intend to maintain our focus on producing a substantial level of tax-free income through a diversified portfolio of lower-quality municipal bonds. We will also continue to position the portfolio to benefit from a steeper yield curve.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4a1c/a4a1c1e1dfdad58d763c4dd5cc2d4121f31a9d0c" alt=""
This commentary reflects the views of the portfolio managers through the end of the Fund’s period discussed in this report. The managers’ statements reflect their own opinions. As such, they are in no way guarantees of future events and are not intended to be used as investment advice or a recommendation regarding any specific security. They are also subject to change at any time as market and other conditions warrant.
1 Figures from Morningstar, Inc. include reinvested dividends and do not take into account sales charges. Actual load-adjusted performance is lower.
2 As a percentage of net assets on February 28, 2007.
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
5
A look at performance
For the periods ending February 28, 2007
| | Average annual returns | | Cumulative total returns | | | | SEC 30- |
| | with maximum sales charge (POP) | | with maximum sales charge (POP) | | | | day yield |
| Inception | | | | Since | | | | | Since | | as of |
Class | date | 1-year | 5-year | 10-year | inception | 6 months | 1-year | 5-year | 10-year | inception | | 2-28-07 |
|
A | 12-31-93 | 1.93% | 5.28% | 4.72% | — | –1.25% | 1.93% | 29.33% | 58.56% | — | | 4.24% |
|
B | 8-25-86 | 0.99 | 5.14 | 4.59 | — | –1.97 | 0.99 | 28.49 | 56.64 | — | | 3.70 |
|
C | 4-1-99 | 4.99 | 5.46 | — | 3.96% | 2.03 | 4.99 | 30.47 | — | 35.95% | | 3.70 |
|
Performance figures assume all distributions are reinvested. POP (Public Offering Price) figures reflect maximum sales charge on Class A shares of 4.5% and the applicable contingent deferred sales charge (CDSC) on Class B and Class C shares. The returns for Class C shares have been adjusted to reflect the elimination of the front-end sales charge effective July 15, 2004. The Class B shares’ CDSC declines annually between years 1–6 according to the following schedule: 5, 4, 3, 3, 2, 1%. No sales charge will be assessed after the sixth year. Class C shares held for less than one year are subject to a 1% CDSC.
The returns reflect past results and should not be considered indicative of future performance. The return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be higher or lower than the performance shown. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, please call 1-800-225-5291 or visit the Fund’s Web site at www.jhfunds.com.
The performance table above and the chart on the next page do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. Please note that a portion of the Fund’s income may be subject to taxes, and some investors may be subject to the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Also note that capital gains are taxable.
The Fund’s performance results reflect any applicable expense reductions, without which the expenses would increase and results would have been less favorable.
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
6
Growth of $10,000
This chart shows what happened to a hypothetical $10,000 investment in High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class A shares for the period indicated. For comparison, we’ve shown the same investment in the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36bb9/36bb90b04218d9340e20290e726fb34c7883e289" alt=""
| | | With maximum | |
Class | Period beginning | Without sales charge | sales charge | Index |
|
B1 | 2-28-97 | $15,664 | $15,664 | $17,490 |
|
C1 | 4-1-99 | 13,595 | 13,595 | 15,077 |
|
Assuming all distributions were reinvested for the period indicated, the table above shows the value of a $10,000 investment in the Fund’s Class B and Class C shares, respectively, as of February 28, 2007. The Class C shares investment with maximum sales charge has been adjusted to reflect the elimination of the front-end sales charge effective July 15, 2004. Performance of the classes will vary based on the difference in sales charges paid by shareholders investing in the different classes and the fee structure of those classes.
Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index is an unmanaged index that includes municipal bonds and is commonly used as a measure of bond performance.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Index figures do not reflect sales charges which would have resulted in lower values if they did.
1 No contingent deferred sales charge applicable.
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
7
Your expenses
These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing operating expenses.
Understanding fund expenses
As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur two types of costs:
■ Transaction costs which include sales charges (loads) on purchases or redemptions (varies by share class), minimum account fee charge, etc.
■ Ongoing operating expenses including management fees, distribution and service fees (if applicable) and other fund expenses.
We are going to present only your ongoing operating expenses here.
Actual expenses/actual returns
This example is intended to provide information about your fund’s actual ongoing operating expenses, and is based on your fund’s actual return. It assumes an account value of $1,000.00 on September 1, 2006, with the same investment held until February 28, 2007.
| Account value | Ending value | Expenses paid during period |
| on 9-1-06 | on 2-28-07 | ended 2-28-071 |
|
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,034.10 | $6.51 |
|
Class B | 1,000.00 | 1,030.30 | 10.05 |
|
Class C | 1,000.00 | 1,030.30 | 10.05 |
|
Together with the value of your account, you may use this information to estimate the operating expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value at February 28, 2007 by $1,000.00, then multiply it by the “expenses paid” for your share class from the table above. For example, for an account value of $8,600.00, the operating expenses should be calculated as follows:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/feeec/feeec90ee9e01c8c6b0ea7882d9b293d51edfb1e" alt=""
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
8
Hypothetical example for comparison purposes
This table allows you to compare your fund’s ongoing operating expenses with those of any other fund. It provides an example of the Fund’s hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on each class’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% annual return before expenses (which is not your fund’s actual return). It assumes an account value of $1,000.00 on September 1, 2006, with the same investment held until February 28, 2007. Look in any other fund shareholder report to find its hypothetical example and you will be able to compare these expenses.
| Account value | Ending value | Expenses paid during period |
| on 9-1-06 | on 2-28-07 | ended 2-28-071 |
|
Class A | $1,000.00 | $1,018.40 | $6.46 |
|
Class B | 1,000.00 | 1,014.90 | 9.97 |
|
Class C | 1,000.00 | 1,014.90 | 9.97 |
|
Remember, these examples do not include any transaction costs, such as sales charges; therefore, these examples will not help you to determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. If transaction costs were included, your expenses would have been higher. See the prospectus for details regarding transaction costs.
1 Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.27%, 1.99% and 1.99% for Class A, Class B and Class C, respectively, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by number of days in most recent fiscal half-year/365 or 366 (to reflect the one-half year period).
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
9
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Fund’s investments
Securities owned by the Fund on 2-28-07 (unaudited)
This schedule is divided into two main categories: tax-exempt long-term bonds and short-term investments. Tax-exempt long-term bonds are broken down by state or territory. Under each state or territory is a list of securities owned by the Fund. Short-term investments, which represent the Fund’s cash position, are listed last.
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
Tax-exempt long-term bonds 105.76% | | | | | | $105,938,556 |
|
(Cost $97,735,094) | | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Alaska 0.98% | | | | | | 981,360 |
|
Northern Tobacco Securitization Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Asset Backed Tobacco | | | | | | |
Settlement Ser 2006A | 5.000% | | 06-01-46 | Baa3 | $1,000 | 981,360 |
| | | | | | |
California 12.83% | | | | | | 12,848,727 |
|
California Pollution Control | | | | | | |
Financing Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Chemical Waste Mgmt Inc Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2005C | 5.125 | | 11-01-23 | BBB | 1,000 | 1,055,640 |
|
Chula Vista Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev San Diego Gas Ser 2005D | 5.000 | | 12-01-27 | A+ | 1,000 | 1,061,490 |
|
Foothill/Eastern Transportation | | | | | | |
Corridor Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Toll Rd Cap Apprec | Zero | | 01-15-36 | BBB– | 4,000 | 746,520 |
Rev Toll Rd Cap Apprec Sr Lien Ser 1995A | Zero | | 01-01-18 | AAA | 7,950 | 5,147,307 |
|
Millbrae, City of, | | | | | | |
Rev Magnolia of Milbrae Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 1997A (G) | 7.375 | | 09-01-27 | BB | 1,000 | 1,038,040 |
|
San Bernardino, County of, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Cert of Part Med Ctr Fin Proj | 5.500 | | 08-01-17 | AAA | 2,500 | 2,752,550 |
|
San Diego County Water Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Cert of Part Inverse Floater (P) | 7.687 | | 04-23-08 | AAA | 1,000 | 1,047,180 |
| | | | | | |
Colorado 3.15% | | | | | | 3,152,172 |
|
Colorado Health Facilities Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Christian Living Cmnty Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2006A (G) | 5.750 | | 01-01-26 | BB+ | 1,000 | 1,055,280 |
|
E-470 Public Highway Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Cap Apprec Sr Ser 2000B | Zero | | 09-01-35 | BBB– | 15,700 | 2,096,892 |
| | | | | | |
Connecticut 1.05% | | | | | | 1,050,090 |
|
Connecticut Development Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Poll Control Connecticut | | | | | | |
Light & Pwr Ser 1 | 5.850 | | 09-01-28 | BBB– | 1,000 | 1,050,090 |
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
10
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
|
Delaware 1.11% | | | | | | $1,116,010 |
|
Charter MAC Equity Issuer Trust, | | | | | | |
Preferred Tax Exempt Shares | | | | | | |
Ser A-4-2 (S) | 6.000% | | 04-30-19 | A3 | $1,000 | 1,116,010 |
| | | | | | |
Florida 23.08% | | | | | | 23,114,277 |
|
Aberdeen Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment (G) | 5.500 | | 05-01-36 | BB+ | 1,000 | 1,019,490 |
|
Ave Maria Stewardship Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Cap Improvement Ser 2006A | 5.125 | | 05-01-38 | BB+ | 1,000 | 1,002,470 |
|
Bonnet Creek Resort Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment (G) | 7.375 | | 05-01-34 | BB+ | 1,055 | 1,158,379 |
Rev Spec Assessment (G) | 7.250 | | 05-01-18 | BB+ | 1,445 | 1,592,274 |
|
Capital Projects Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Student Hsg Cap Projs Ln Prog | | | | | | |
Ser 2000A (G) | 7.850 | | 08-15-31 | AA | 2,000 | 2,299,600 |
Rev Student Hsg Cap Projs Ln Prog | | | | | | |
Ser 2001G (G) | 9.125 | | 10-01-11 | BBB | 1,280 | 1,348,774 |
|
Capital Trust Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Seminole Tribe Convention | | | | | | |
Ser 2003A | 8.950 | | 10-01-33 | AAA | 1,000 | 1,226,600 |
|
Crosscreek Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment Ser 2007B (G) | 5.500 | | 05-01-17 | BB– | 1,000 | 1,032,170 |
|
Crossings at Fleming Island Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Spec Assessment Ser 2000C (G) | 7.100 | | 05-01-30 | BBB– | 1,000 | 1,070,310 |
|
Grand Haven Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment Ser 1997B (G) | 6.900 | | 05-01-19 | BBB– | 895 | 896,486 |
|
Miami Beach Health Facilities Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Hosp Mt Sinai Medical Ctr | | | | | | |
Ser 2001A | 6.125 | | 11-15-11 | BB+ | 915 | 979,050 |
|
Midtown Miami Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment Ser 2004A (G) | 6.000 | | 05-01-24 | BB | 2,000 | 2,162,980 |
|
Oakmont Grove Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment Ser 2007B (G) | 5.250 | | 05-01-12 | BB+ | 1,000 | 1,002,260 |
|
Orlando Urban Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment Cap Imp (G) | 6.000 | | 05-01-20 | BB+ | 855 | 920,519 |
|
Poinciana Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment Ser 2000A (G) | 7.125 | | 05-01-31 | BB+ | 500 | 527,355 |
|
Riverwood Estates Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Spec Assessment Ser 2006B | 5.000 | | 05-01-13 | BB | 1,000 | 1,000,980 |
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
11
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
| | | | | | |
Florida (continued) | | | | | | |
|
South Kendall Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment Ser 2000A (G) | 5.900% | | 05-01-35 | BBB– | $990 | $1,039,629 |
|
Waterchase Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Cap Imp Ser 2001A (G) | 6.700 | | 05-01-32 | BBB– | 700 | 748,881 |
|
West Villages Improvement District, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Spec Assessment (G) | 5.800 | | 05-01-36 | BB | 1,000 | 1,049,210 |
|
Winter Garden Village Community | | | | | | |
Development District, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Assessment (G) | 5.650 | | 05-01-37 | BB+ | 1,000 | 1,036,860 |
| | | | | | |
Georgia 12.28% | | | | | | 12,296,900 |
|
Atlanta, City of, | | | | | | |
Rev Tax Alloc Eastside Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2005B (G) | 5.600 | | 01-01-30 | BB+ | 1,500 | 1,558,800 |
Rev Wtr & Waste Wtr (I)(P) | 5.000 | | 11-01-19 | AAA | 10,000 | 10,738,100 |
| | | | | | |
Illinois 2.86% | | | | | | 2,865,189 |
|
Chicago, City of, | | | | | | |
Gen Oblig Tax Alloc Jr Pilsen Redev | | | | | | |
Ser 2004B (G) | 6.750 | | 06-01-22 | BBB+ | 2,000 | 2,196,120 |
|
Illinois Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Landing at Plymouth Place Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2005A (G) | 6.000 | | 05-15-37 | BB | 625 | 669,069 |
| | | | | | |
Indiana 0.75% | | | | | | 751,085 |
|
St. Joseph, County of, | | | | | | |
Rev Econ Dev Holy Cross Village | | | | | | |
Notre Dame Proj Ser 2006A (G) | 6.000 | | 05-15-26 | BB+ | 230 | 246,445 |
Rev Econ Dev Holy Cross Village | | | | | | |
Notre Dame Proj Ser 2006A (G) | 6.000 | | 05-15-38 | BB+ | 475 | 504,640 |
| | | | | | |
Iowa 1.30% | | | | | | 1,299,365 |
|
Iowa Finance Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Hlth Care Facil Care | | | | | | |
Initiatives Proj | 9.250 | | 07-01-25 | AAA | 195 | 238,735 |
Rev Ref Hlth Facil Care | | | | | | |
Initiatives Proj Ser 2006 A | 5.500 | | 07-01-25 | BBB– | 1,000 | 1,060,630 |
| | | | | | |
Maryland 2.89% | | | | | | 2,898,706 |
|
Baltimore Convention Center, | | | | | | |
Rev Hotel Ser 2006B | 5.875 | | 09-01-39 | BB | 800 | 853,016 |
|
Prince Georges, County of, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Tax Dist Victoria Falls Proj (G) | 5.250 | | 07-01-35 | BB+ | 1,000 | 1,019,910 |
Spec Oblig National Harbor Proj (G) | 5.200 | | 07-01-34 | BBB | 1,000 | 1,025,780 |
| | | | | | |
Massachusetts 9.06% | | | | | | 9,074,454 |
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, | | | | | |
Rev Boston Univ Ser 2002R-2 (P) | 3.620 | | 10-01-42 | AAA | 1,100 | 1,100,000 |
Rev Mass College of Pharmacy & | | | | | | |
Allied Hlth Science | 5.750 | | 07-01-33 | BBB+ | 1,000 | 1,082,100 |
Rev Resource Recovery Ogden | | | | | | |
Haverhill Proj Ser 1998 | 5.500 | | 12-01-19 | BBB | 1,700 | 1,764,260 |
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
12
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
| | | | | | |
Massachusetts (continued) | | | | | | |
|
Massachusetts Health & Educational | | | | | | |
Facilities Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Civic Investments Inc Ser 2002B (G) | 9.200% | | 12-15-31 | BB | $2,500 | $3,075,700 |
Rev Jordan Hosp Ser 2003E | 6.750 | | 10-01-33 | BBB– | 1,000 | 1,108,420 |
|
Massachusetts Industrial Finance Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Assisted Living Facil Newton | | | | | | |
Group Properties | 8.000 | | 09-01-27 | AAA | 900 | 943,974 |
| | | | | | |
Mississippi 1.51% | | | | | | 1,513,575 |
|
Mississippi Business Finance Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Northrop Grumman Ship Sys | 4.550 | | 12-01-28 | BBB+ | 1,500 | 1,513,575 |
| | | | | | |
New Jersey 3.50% | | | | | | 3,509,510 |
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities | | | | | | |
Financing Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Care Institute Inc | | | | | | |
Cherry Hill Proj (G) | 8.000 | | 07-01-27 | B+ | 1,250 | 1,278,600 |
Rev Ref St Peters Univ Hosp | | | | | | |
Ser 2000A | 6.875 | | 07-01-30 | BBB | 1,000 | 1,089,680 |
|
New Jersey Tobacco Settlement | | | | | | |
Financing Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Asset Backed Bond | 6.250 | | 06-01-43 | AAA | 1,000 | 1,141,230 |
| | | | | | |
New York 3.69% | | | | | | 3,692,546 |
|
New York City Industrial | | | | | | |
Development Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Liberty 7 World Trade Ctr | | | | | | |
Ser 2005A (G) | 6.250 | | 03-01-15 | BB– | 1,500 | 1,595,655 |
Rev Spec Facil Rev British | | | | | | |
Airways Plc Proj | 5.250 | | 12-01-32 | BB– | 1,000 | 1,004,990 |
|
New York Liberty Development Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev National Sports Museum Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2006A (G) | 6.125 | | 02-15-19 | BB– | 500 | 528,060 |
|
Port Auth of New York & New Jersey, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Spec Proj KIAC Partners | | | | | | |
Ser 4 (G) | 6.750 | | 10-01-19 | BBB– | 555 | 563,841 |
| | | | | | |
Oklahoma 1.19% | | | | | | 1,193,760 |
|
Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Ser 2000A (P) | 7.750 | | 06-01-35 | B | 1,000 | 1,193,760 |
| | | | | | |
Oregon 2.71% | | | | | | 2,711,424 |
|
Salem Hospital Facility Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Salem Hospital Proj Ser 2006A | 5.000 | | 08-15-27 | A+ | 1,000 | 1,058,720 |
|
Western Generation Agency, | | | | | | |
Rev Wauna Cogeneration Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2006B (G) | 5.000 | | 01-01-14 | BBB– | 1,105 | 1,136,504 |
Rev Wauna Cogeneration Proj | | | | | | |
Ser 2006B (G) | 5.000 | | 01-01-16 | BBB– | 500 | 516,200 |
| | | | | | |
Puerto Rico 4.77% | | | | | | 4,780,933 |
|
Puerto Rico, Commonwealth of, | | | | | | |
Pub Impt Ser A (I)(P) | 5.000 | | 07-01-18 | Aaa | 3,345 | 3,614,373 |
|
Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Auth, | | | | | |
Rev Ref Ser 2007N (N) | 5.500 | | 07-01-26 | BBB+ | 1,000 | 1,166,560 |
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
13
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | | Maturity | Credit | Par value | |
State, issuer, description | rate | | date | rating (A) | (000) | Value |
| | | | | | |
Rhode Island 0.48% | | | | | | $483,991 |
|
Tiverton, Town of, | | | | | | |
Rev Spec Oblig Tax Mount Hope Bay | | | | | | |
Village Ser 2002 (G) | 6.875% | | 05-01-22 | BB+ | $445 | 483,991 |
| | | | | | |
South Carolina 1.05% | | | | | | 1,048,150 |
|
Lancaster, County of, | | | | | | |
Rev Assessment Edenmoor Imp Dist | | | | | | |
Ser 2006A (G) | 5.750 | | 12-01-37 | BB | 1,000 | 1,048,150 |
| | | | | | |
Tennessee 1.16% | | | | | | 1,164,090 |
|
Johnson City Health & Educational | | | | | | |
Facilities Board, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Hosp 1st Mtg Mtn States | | | | | | |
Hlth Ser 2000A | 7.500 | | 07-01-33 | BBB+ | 1,000 | 1,164,090 |
| | | | | | |
Texas 5.78% | | | | | | 5,791,593 |
|
Austin Convention Enterprises Inc. | | | | | | |
Convention Ctr, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Second Tier Ser 2006B | 5.750 | | 01-01-24 | BB | 1,000 | 1,077,170 |
|
Bexar County Health Facilities | | | | | | |
Development Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Army Retirement Residence Proj | 6.300 | | 07-01-32 | BBB | 150 | 169,270 |
|
Brazos River Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Poll Control Texas Utilities Co | | | | | | |
Ser 1999A | 7.700 | | 04-01-33 | BBB– | 1,000 | 1,148,190 |
|
Gulf Coast Industrial Development Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Solid Waste Disposal Citgo | | | | | | |
Petroleum Proj | 8.000 | | 04-01-28 | Baa3 | 2,100 | 2,357,943 |
|
Metro Health Facilities Development Corp, | | | | | | |
Rev Wilson N Jones Mem Hosp Proj | 7.250 | | 01-01-31 | B1 | 1,000 | 1,039,020 |
| | | | | | |
Virginia 7.00% | | | | | | 7,014,770 |
|
Henrico County Economic | | | | | | |
Development Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Mtg Westminster Canterbury | 5.000 | | 10-01-35 | BBB– | 1,000 | 1,030,700 |
|
Peninsula Ports Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Baptist Homes Res Care | | | | | | |
Facility Ser 2006C (G) | 5.375 | | 12-01-26 | BB | 1,000 | 1,039,560 |
|
Pocahontas Parkway Association, | | | | | | |
Rev Toll Rd Cap Apprec Sr Ser 1998B | Zero | | 08-15-19 | AAA | 5,000 | 2,573,700 |
Rev Toll Rd Cap Apprec Sr Ser 1998B | Zero | | 08-15-30 | AAA | 5,000 | 1,343,150 |
|
Suffolk Industrial Development Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref First Mortgage Lake | | | | | | |
Prince Ctr (G) | 5.300 | | 09-01-31 | BB+ | 1,000 | 1,027,660 |
| | | | | | |
Washington 1.05% | | | | | | 1,052,064 |
|
Washington Tobacco Settlement Auth, | | | | | | |
Rev Asset Backed Bond | 6.500 | | 06-01-26 | BBB | 960 | 1,052,064 |
| | | | | | |
Wyoming 0.53% | | | | | | 533,815 |
|
Sweetwater, County of, | | | | | | |
Rev Ref Solid Waste Disposal | | | | | | |
FMC Corp Proj | 5.600 | | 12-01-35 | BBB– | 500 | 533,815 |
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
14
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
| Interest | Par value | |
Issuer, description, maturity date | rate | (000) | Value |
|
Short-term investments 0.15% | | | $149,000 |
|
(Cost $149,000) | | | |
| | | |
Joint Repurchase Agreement 0.15% | | | 149,000 |
|
Investment in a joint repurchase agreement | | | |
transaction with Cantor Fitzgerald LP — | | | |
Dated 2-28-07, due 3-1-07 (Secured by | | | |
U.S. Treasury Inflation Indexed Notes 1.875% | | | |
due 7-15-13 and 2.000% due 7-15-14). | | | |
Maturity value: $149,022 | 5.270% | $149 | 149,000 |
|
Total investments (Cost $97,884,094) 105.91% | | | $106,087,556 |
|
|
Other assets and liabilities, net (5.91%) | | | ($5,915,586) |
|
|
Total net assets 100.00% | | | $100,171,970 |
(A) Credit ratings are unaudited and are rated by Moody’s Investors Service or Fitch where Standard & Poor’s ratings are not available unless indicated otherwise.
(G) Security rated internally by John Hancock Advisers, LLC.
(I) Security forms part of an inverse floater trust.
(N) This security, having an aggregate value of $1,166,560 or 1.16% of the Fund’s net assets, has been purchased on a when-issued basis. The purchase price and the interest rate of such securities are fixed at trade date, although the Fund does not earn any interest on such securities until settlement date. The Fund has instructed its custodian bank to segregate assets with a current value at least equal to the amount of its when-issued commitments. Accordingly, the market value of $1,195,467 of Atlanta GA Wtr & Wastewtr, 6.955, 11-1-19 has been segregated to cover the when-issued commitments.
(P) Represents rate in effect on February 28, 2007.
(S) This security is exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. Such security may be resold, normally to qualified institutional buyers, in transactions exempt from registration. Rule 144A securities amounted to $1,116,010 or 1.11% of the Fund’s net assets as of February 28, 2007.
The percentage shown for each investment category is the total value of that category as a percentage of the net assets of the Fund.
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
15
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Financial statements
Statement of assets and liabilities 2-28-07 (unaudited)
This Statement of Assets and Liabilities is the Fund’s balance sheet. It shows the value of what the Fund owns, is due and owes. You’ll also find the net asset value and the maximum offering price per share.
Assets | |
|
Investments at value (cost $97,884,094) | $106,087,556 |
Cash | 729 |
Receivable for investments sold | 586,963 |
Inverse floater bond swap at value | 438,277 |
Interest receivable | 1,408,702 |
Other assets | 36,227 |
Total assets | 108,558,454 |
|
Liabilities | |
|
Payable for investments purchased | 3,143,500 |
Payable for shares repurchased | 40,350 |
Interest expense and fees payable on inverse floaters | 59,089 |
Payable for floating rate notes issued | 5,000,000 |
Dividends payable | 12,487 |
Payable to affiliates | |
Management fees | 47,812 |
Distribution and service fees | 5,807 |
Other | 5,747 |
Other payables and accrued expenses | 71,692 |
Total liabilities | 8,386,484 |
|
Net assets | |
|
Capital paid-in | 105,168,510 |
Accumulated net realized loss on investments | (13,386,470) |
Net unrealized appreciation of investments | 8,203,462 |
Accumulated net investment income | 186,468 |
Net assets | $100,171,970 |
|
Net asset value per share | |
|
Based on net asset values and shares outstanding — the Fund has an | |
unlimited number of shares authorized with no par value | |
Class A ($76,879,709 ÷ 8,767,788 shares) | $8.77 |
Class B ($13,418,034 ÷ 1,530,336 shares) | $8.77 |
Class C ($9,874,227 ÷ 1,126,139 shares) | $8.77 |
|
Maximum offering price per share | |
|
Class A1 ($8.77 ÷ 95.5%) | $9.18 |
1 On single retail sales of less than $100,000. On sales of $100,000 or more and on group sales the offering price is reduced.
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
16
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Statement of operations For the period ended 2-28-07 (unaudited)1
This Statement of Operations summarizes the Fund’s investment income earned and expenses incurred in operating the Fund. It also shows net gains (losses) for the period stated.
Investment income | |
|
Interest | $3,061,634 |
| |
Total investment income | 3,061,634 |
|
Expenses | |
|
Investment management fees (Note 2) | 302,311 |
Distribution and service fees (Note 2) | 215,336 |
Transfer agent fees (Note 2) | 28,678 |
Accounting and legal services fees (Note 2) | 7,043 |
Compliance fees | 1,144 |
Blue sky fees | 23,979 |
Custodian fees | 18,177 |
Professional fees | 15,280 |
Printing fees | 7,867 |
Trustees’ fees | 1,895 |
Interest expense and fees on inverse floaters | 99,917 |
Miscellaneous | 3,927 |
| |
Total expenses | 725,554 |
Less expense reimbursements (Note 2) | (57) |
| |
Net expenses | 725,497 |
| |
Net investment income | 2,336,137 |
|
Realized and unrealized gain (loss) | |
|
Net realized loss on investments | (458,721) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments | 1,387,777 |
| |
Net realized and unrealized gain | 929,056 |
| |
Increase in net assets from operations | $3,265,193 |
1 Semiannual period from 9-1-06 through 2-28-07.
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
17
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Statement of changes in net assets
These Statements of Changes in Net Assets show how the value of the Fund’s net assets has changed during the last two periods. The difference reflects earnings less expenses, any investment gains and losses, distributions, if any, paid to shareholders and the net of Fund share transactions.
| Year | Period |
| ended | ended |
| 8-31-06 | 2-28-071 |
|
Increase (decrease) in net assets | | |
From operations | | |
Net investment income | $4,568,785 | $2,336,137 |
Net realized loss | (98,761) | (458,721) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 613,621 | 1,387,777 |
| | |
Increase in net assets resulting from operations | 5,083,645 | 3,265,193 |
| | |
Distributions to shareholders | | |
From net investment income | | |
Class A | (3,358,239) | (1,758,871) |
Class B | (796,233) | (290,832) |
Class C | (349,621) | (190,365) |
| | |
| (4,504,093) | (2,240,068) |
| | |
From Fund share transactions | (7,391,972) | 1,320,854 |
| | |
Net assets | | |
|
Beginning of period | 104,638,411 | 97,825,991 |
| | |
End of period2 | $97,825,991 | $100,171,970 |
1 Semiannual period from 9-1-06 through 2-28-07. Unaudited.
2 Accumulated (distributions in excess of) net investment income of ($13,236) and $186,468, respectively.
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
18
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Financial highlights
The Financial Highlights show how the Fund’s net asset value for a share has changed since the end of the previous period.
CLASS A SHARES | | | | | | |
|
Period ended | 8-31-021,2 | 8-31-031 | 8-31-041 | 8-31-051 | 8-31-06 | 2-28-073 |
|
Per share operating performance | | | | | | |
|
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | $8.82 | $8.43 | $8.14 | $8.27 | $8.62 | $8.68 |
Net investment income4 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.21 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | (0.40) | (0.29) | 0.12 | 0.35 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
Total from investment operations | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.59 | 0.78 | 0.47 | 0.29 |
Less distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | (0.52) | (0.51) | (0.46) | (0.43) | (0.41) | (0.20) |
Net asset value, end of period | $8.43 | $8.14 | $8.27 | $8.62 | $8.68 | $8.77 |
Total return5,6 (%) | 1.56 | 2.63 | 7.41 | 9.64 | 5.61 | 3.417 |
|
Ratios and supplemental data | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period | | | | | | |
(in millions) | $74 | $71 | $69 | $72 | $72 | $77 |
Ratio of net expenses (excluding | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse | | | | | | |
floaters) to average net assets (%) | 1.08 | 1.09 | 1.09 | 1.14 | 1.09 | 1.088 |
Ratio of net expenses (including | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse | | | | | | |
floaters) to average net assets (%) | — | — | — | — | — | 1.298 |
Ratio of gross expenses to average | | | | | | |
net assets9 (%) | 1.09 | 1.11 | 1.10 | 1.14 | 1.09 | 1.298,10 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | 6.26 | 6.16 | 5.67 | 5.09 | 4.84 | 4.898 |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 52 | 35 | 57 | 65 | 52 | 337 |
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
19
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Financial highlights
CLASS B SHARES | | | | | | |
|
Period ended | 8-31-021,2 | 8-31-031 | 8-31-041 | 8-31-051 | 8-31-06 | 2-28-073 |
|
Per share operating performance | | | | | | |
|
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | $8.82 | $8.43 | $8.14 | $8.27 | $8.62 | $8.68 |
Net investment income4 | 0.46 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.18 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | (0.40) | (0.30) | 0.12 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 0.08 |
Total from investment operations | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.53 | 0.72 | 0.40 | 0.26 |
Less distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | (0.45) | (0.44) | (0.40) | (0.37) | (0.34) | (0.17) |
Net asset value, end of period | $8.43 | $8.14 | $8.27 | $8.62 | $8.68 | $8.77 |
Total return5,6 (%) | 0.81 | 1.87 | 6.62 | 8.84 | 4.83 | 3.037 |
|
Ratios and supplemental data | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period | | | | | | |
(in millions) | $46 | $37 | $31 | $24 | $16 | $13 |
Ratio of net expenses (excluding | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse | | | | | | |
floaters) to average net assets (%) | 1.83 | 1.84 | 1.83 | 1.87 | 1.84 | 1.838 |
Ratio of net expenses (including | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse | | | | | | |
floaters) to average net assets (%) | — | — | — | — | — | 2.018 |
Ratio of gross expenses to average | | | | | | |
net assets9 (%) | 1.84 | 1.86 | 1.84 | 1.87 | 1.84 | 2.018,10 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | 5.51 | 5.41 | 4.93 | 4.35 | 4.11 | 4.188 |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 52 | 35 | 57 | 65 | 52 | 337 |
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
20
F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
Financial highlights
CLASS C SHARES | | | | | | |
|
Period ended | 8-31-021,2 | 8-31-031 | 8-31-041 | 8-31-051 | 8-31-06 | 2-28-073 |
|
Per share operating performance | | | | | | |
|
Net asset value, | | | | | | |
beginning of period | $8.82 | $8.43 | $8.14 | $8.27 | $8.62 | $8.68 |
Net investment income4 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.36 | 0.35 | 0.18 |
Net realized and unrealized | | | | | | |
gain (loss) on investments | (0.40) | (0.29) | 0.13 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
Total from investment operations | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.53 | 0.72 | 0.40 | 0.26 |
Less distributions | | | | | | |
From net investment income | (0.45) | (0.44) | (0.40) | (0.37) | (0.34) | (0.17) |
Net asset value, end of period | $8.43 | $8.14 | $8.27 | $8.62 | $8.68 | $8.77 |
Total return5,6 (%) | 0.81 | 1.87 | 6.61 | 8.82 | 4.83 | 3.037 |
|
Ratios and supplemental data | | | | | | |
|
Net assets, end of period | | | | | | |
(in millions) | $4 | $6 | $8 | $8 | $9 | $10 |
Ratio of net expenses (excluding | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse | | | | | | |
floaters) to average net assets (%) | 1.83 | 1.84 | 1.83 | 1.89 | 1.84 | 1.838 |
Ratio of net expenses (including | | | | | | |
interest expense on inverse | | | | | | |
floaters) to average net assets (%) | — | — | — | — | — | 2.008 |
Ratio of gross expenses to average | | | | | | |
net assets9 (%) | 1.84 | 1.86 | 1.84 | 1.89 | 1.84 | 2.008,10 |
Ratio of net investment income | | | | | | |
to average net assets (%) | 5.51 | 5.38 | 4.88 | 4.33 | 4.09 | 4.148 |
Portfolio turnover (%) | 52 | 35 | 57 | 65 | 52 | 337 |
1 Audited by previous auditor.
2 As required, effective 9-1-01, the Fund has adopted the provisions of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies, as revised, relating to the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on debt securities. The effect of this change on per share amounts for the year ended 8-31-02 was to increase net investment income per share by $0.01, increase net realized and unrealized losses per share by $0.01 and, had the Fund not made these changes to amortization and accretion, the ratio of net investment income to average net assets would have been 6.17%, 5.42% and 5.42% for Class A, Class B and Class C shares, respectively. Per share ratios and supplemental data for periods prior to 9-1-01 have not been restated to reflect this change in presentation.
3 Semiannual period from 9-1-06 through 2-28-07. Unaudited.
4 Based on the average of the shares outstanding.
5 Assumes dividend reinvestment and does not reflect the effect of sales charges.
6 Total returns would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced during the periods shown.
7 Not annualized.
8 Annualized.
9 Does not take into consideration expense reductions during the periods shown.
10 Includes interest expense on inverse floaters.
See notes to financial statements
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
21
Notes to financial statements (unaudited)
Note 1
Accounting policies
John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (the “Fund”) is a non-diversified series of John Hancock Municipal Securities Trust (the “Trust”), an open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), as amended. The investment objective of the Fund is to seek a high level of current income that is largely exempt from federal income tax, consistent with preservation of capital.
The Trustees have authorized the issuance of multiple classes of shares of the Fund, designated as Class A, Class B and Class C shares. The shares of each class represent an interest in the same portfolio of investments of the Fund and have equal rights as to voting, redemptions, dividends and liquidation, except that certain expenses, subject to the approval of the Trustees, may be applied differently to each class of shares in accordance with current regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Internal Revenue Service. Shareholders of a class that bears distribution and service expenses under the terms of a distribution plan have exclusive voting rights to that distribution plan. Class B shares will convert to Class A shares eight years after purchase.
Significant accounting policies of the Fund are as follows:
Valuation of investments
Securities in the Fund’s portfolio are valued on the basis of market quotations, valuations provided by independent pricing services or at fair value as determined in good faith in accordance with procedures approved by the Trustees. Short-term debt investments which have a remaining maturity of 60 days or less may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.
Joint repurchase agreement
Pursuant to an exemptive order issued by the SEC, the Fund, along with other registered investment companies having a management contract with John Hancock Advisers, LLC (the “Adviser”), a wholly owned subsidiary of John Hancock Financial Services, Inc., a subsidiary of Manulife Financial Corporation (“MFC”), may participate in a joint repurchase agreement transaction. Aggregate cash balances are invested in one or more large repurchase agreements, whose underlying securities are obligations of the U.S. government and/or its agencies. The Fund’s custodian bank receives delivery of the underlying securities for the joint account on the Fund’s behalf. The Adviser is responsible for ensuring that the agreement is fully collateralized at all times.
Investment transactions
Investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date plus one basis for daily net asset value calculations. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are reported on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on sales of investments are determined on the identified cost basis.
Discount and premium on securities
The Fund accretes discount and amortizes premium from par value on securities from either the date of issue or the date of purchase over the life of the security.
Class allocations
Income, common expenses and realized and unrealized gains (losses) are determined at the fund level and allocated daily to each class of shares based on the appropriate net asset value of the respective classes. Distribution and service fees, if any, are calculated daily at the class level based on the appropriate net asset value of each class and the specific expense rate(s) applicable to each class.
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
22
Expenses
The majority of expenses are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses that are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated in such a manner as deemed equitable, taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative sizes of the funds.
Bank borrowings
The Fund is permitted to have bank borrowings for temporary or emergency purposes, including the meeting of redemption requests that otherwise might require the untimely disposition of securities. The Fund has entered into a syndicated line of credit agreement with various banks. This agreement enables the Fund to participate, with other funds managed by the Adviser, in an unsecured line of credit with banks, which permits borrowings of up to $150 million, collectively. Interest is charged to each fund based on its borrowing. In addition, a commitment fee is charged to each fund based on the average daily unused portion of the line of credit, and is allocated among the participating funds. The Fund had no borrowing activity under the line of credit during the period ended February 28, 2007.
Inverse floaters
Inverse floating rate notes are debt instruments with a floating rate of interest that bears an inverse relationship to changes in short-term market interest rates. Investments in this type of instrument involve special risks as compared to investments in a fixed rate municipal security. The debt instrument in which the Fund may invest is a tender option bond trust (the “trust”) which can be established by the Fund, a financial institution, or broker, consisting of underlying municipal obligations with intermediate to long maturities and a fixed interest rate. Other investors in the trust usually consist of money market fund investors receiving weekly floating interest rate payments who have put options with the financial institutions. The Fund may enter into shortfall and forebearance agreements by which a Fund agrees to reimburse the trust, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the fixed rate municipal security held by the trust and the liquidation value of the floating rate notes. The Fund has the price risk of the underlying municipal obligations at the applicable leverage factor. Certain inverse floating rate securities held by the Fund have been created with bonds purchased by the Fund and subsequently transferred to the trust. These transactions are considered a form of financing for accounting purposes. As a result, the Fund includes the original transferred bond and a corresponding liability equal to the floating rate note issued. In addition, when the original transferred bond value and the floating rate note value are disproportionate, the Fund processes a bond swap transaction for the difference in value. The Fund does not consider the Fund’s investment in inverse floaters borrowing within the meaning of the 1940 Act, as amended. Inverse floating rate notes exhibit added interest rate sensitivity compar ed to other bonds with a similar maturity. Moreover, since these securities are in a trust form, a sale may take longer to settle then the standard two days after trade date.
The weighted average outstanding daily balance of the floating rate notes issued during the period ended February 28, 2007 was approximately $5,000,000 with a weighted average interest rate of 3.25% .
Federal income taxes
The Fund qualifies as a “regulated investment company” by complying with the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and will not be subject to federal income tax on taxable income that is distributed to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. For federal income tax purposes, the Fund has $12,141,925 of a capital loss carryforward available, to the extent provided by regulations, to offset future net realized capital gains. To the extent that such carryforward is used by the Fund, no capital gain distributions will be made. The loss carryforward expires as follows: August 31, 2008 — $3,756,798, August 31, 2010 — $1,227,272, August 31, 2011 — $2,540,698, August 31, 2012 — $2,816,241, August 31, 2013 — $1,681,342 and August 31, 2014 — $119,574.
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
23
New accounting pronouncements
In June 2006, Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (the “Interpretation”) was issued, and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and is to be applied to all open tax years as of the effective date. The Interpretation prescribes a minimum threshold for financial statement recognition of the benefit of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return, and requires certain expanded disclosures. Management is currently evaluating the application of the Interpretation to the Fund and has not at this time quantified the impact, if any, resulting from the adoption of the Interpretation on the Fund’s financial statements. The Fund will implement this pr onouncement no later than February 28, 2008.
In September 2006, FASB Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“FAS 157”) was issued, and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. FAS 157 defines fair value, establishing a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. Management is currently evaluating the application of FAS 157 to the Fund and its impact, if any, resulting from the adoption of FAS 157 on the Fund’s financial statements.
Interest and distributions
Interest income on investment securities is recorded on the accrual basis. The Fund may place a debt obligation on non-accrual status and reduce related interest income by ceasing current accruals and/or writing off interest receivables when the collection of interest has become doubtful.
The Fund records distributions to shareholders from net investment income and net realized gains, if any, on the ex-dividend date. The Fund’s net investment income is declared daily as dividends to shareholders of record as of the close of business on the preceding day and distributed monthly. During the year ended August 31, 2006, the tax character of distributions paid was as follows: ordinary income $13,202 and exempt income $4,490,892. Distributions paid by the Fund with respect to each class of shares are calculated in the same manner, at the same time and are in the same amount, except for the effect of expenses that may be applied differently to each class.
Such distributions, on a tax basis, are determined in conformity with income tax regulations, which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits, if any, are reported in the Fund’s financial statements as a return of capital.
Use of estimates
The preparation of these financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, incorporates estimates made by management in determining the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the Fund. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Note 2
Management fee and transactions with
affiliates and others
The Fund has an investment management contract with the Adviser. Under the investment management contract, the Fund pays a monthly management fee to the Adviser equivalent, on an annual basis, to the sum of: (a) 0.625% of the first $75,000,000 of the Fund’s average daily net asset value, (b) 0.5625% of the next $75,000,000 and (c) 0.50% of the Fund’s average daily net asset value in excess of $150,000,000.
Effective December 31, 2005, the investment management teams of the Adviser were reorganized into Sovereign Asset Management LLC (“Sovereign”), a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of John Hancock Life Insurance Company (“JHLICO”), a subsidiary of MFC. The Adviser remains the principal adviser on the Fund and Sovereign acts as subadviser under the supervision of the Adviser. The restructuring did not have an impact on the Fund, which continues to be managed using the same investment philosophy and process. The Fund is not responsible for payment of the subadvisory fees.
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
24
Effective October 1, 2006, Sovereign changed its name to MFC Global Investment Management (U.S.), LLC.
The Fund has an agreement with its custodian bank, under which custody fees are reduced by balance credits applied during the period. Accordingly, the expense reductions related to custody fee offsets amounted to $57, which had no impact on the Fund’s ratio of expenses to average net assets, for the period ended February 28, 2007. If the Fund had not entered into this agreement, the assets not invested, on which these balance credits were earned, could have produced taxable income.
The Fund has a Distribution Plan with John Hancock Funds, LLC (“JH Funds”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Adviser. The Fund has adopted Distribution Plans with respect to Class A, Class B and Class C, pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act, as amended, to reimburse JH Funds for the services it provides as distributor of shares of the Fund. Accordingly, the Fund makes monthly payments to JH Funds at an annual rate not to exceed 0.25% of Class A average daily net asset value and 1.00% of Class B and Class C average daily net asset value. A maximum of 0.25% of such payments may be service fees, as defined by the Conduct Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers. Under the Conduct Rules, curtailment of a portion of the Fund’s 12b-1 payments could occur under certain circumstances.
Expenses under the agreements described above for the period ended February 28, 2007, were as follows:
| Distribution and |
Share class | service fees |
|
|
Class A | $93,541 |
Class B | 73,603 |
Class C | 48,192 |
Total | $215,336 |
Class A shares are assessed up-front sales charges. During the period ended February 28, 2007, JH Funds received net up-front sales charges of $53,208 with regard to sales of Class A shares. Of this amount, $10,400 was retained and used for printing prospectuses, advertising, sales literature and other purposes; $42,247 was paid as sales commissions to unrelated broker-dealers; and $561 was paid as sales commissions to sales personnel of Signator Investors, Inc. (“Signator Investors”), a related broker-dealer. The Adviser’s indirect parent, JHLICO, is the indirect sole shareholder of Signator Investors.
Class B shares that are redeemed within six years of purchase are subject to a contingent deferred sales charge (“CDSC”) at declining rates, beginning at 5.00% of the lesser of the current market value at the time of redemption or the original purchase cost of the shares being redeemed. Class C shares that are redeemed within one year of purchase are subject to a CDSC at a rate of 1.00% of the lesser of the current market value at the time of redemption or the original purchase cost of the shares being redeemed. Proceeds from the CDSCs are paid to JH Funds and are used, in whole or in part, to defray its expenses for providing distribution-related services to the Fund in connection with the sale of Class B and Class C shares. During the period ended February 28, 2007, CDSCs received by JH Funds amounted to $25,501 for Class B shares and $1,742 for Class C shares.
The Fund has a transfer agent agreement with John Hancock Signature Services, Inc. (“Signature Services”), an indirect subsidiary of JHLICO. The Fund pays a monthly transfer agent fee at an annual rate of 0.01% of each class’s average daily net asset value, plus a fee based on the number of shareholder accounts and reimbursement for certain out-of-pocket expenses, aggregated and allocated to each class on the basis of its relative net asset value.
The Fund has an agreement with the Adviser and affiliates to perform necessary tax, accounting and legal services for the Fund. The compensation for the year amounted to $7,043. The Fund also reimbursed JHLICO for certain compliance costs, included in the Fund’s Statement of Operations.
Mr. James R. Boyle is Chairman of the Adviser, as well as affiliated Trustee of the Fund, and is compensated by the Adviser and/or its affiliates. The compensation of unaffiliated
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
25
Trustees is borne by the Fund. The unaffiliated Trustees may elect to defer, for tax purposes, their receipt of this compensation under the John Hancock Group of Funds Deferred Compensation Plan. The Fund makes investments into other John Hancock funds, as applicable, to cover its liability for the deferred compensation. Investments to cover the Fund’s deferred compensation liability are recorded on the Fund’s books as an other asset. The deferred compensation liability and the related other asset are always equal and are marked to market on a periodic basis to reflect any income earned by the investments, as well as any unrealized gains or losses. The Deferred Compensation Plan investments had no impact on the operations of the Fund.
Note 3
Fund share transactions
This listing illustrates the number of Fund shares sold, reinvested and repurchased during the last two periods, along with the corresponding dollar value.
| Year ended 8-31-06 | Period ended 2-28-071 |
| Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount |
|
Class A shares | | | | |
|
Sold | 1,369,151 | $11,710,101 | 922,614 | $8,056,349 |
Distributions reinvested | 196,912 | 1,684,099 | 99,156 | 867,074 |
Repurchased | (1,537,219) | (13,143,978) | (603,592) | (5,271,667) |
Net increase | 28,844 | $250,222 | 418,178 | $3,651,756 |
|
Class B shares | | | | |
|
Sold | 189,446 | $1,620,500 | 60,380 | $528,256 |
Distributions reinvested | 38,256 | 327,168 | 14,539 | 127,133 |
Repurchased | (1,204,589) | (10,303,303) | (400,211) | (3,494,214) |
Net decrease | (976,887) | ($8,355,635) | (325,292) | ($2,838,825) |
|
Class C shares | | | | |
|
Sold | 237,970 | $2,036,783 | 137,118 | $1,200,228 |
Distributions reinvested | 18,440 | 157,736 | 11,035 | 96,500 |
Repurchased | (172,840) | (1,481,078) | (90,446) | (788,805) |
Net increase | 83,570 | $713,441 | 57,707 | $507,923 |
|
Net increase (decrease) | (864,473) | ($7,391,972) | 150,593 | $1,320,854 |
1 Semiannual period from 9-1-06 through 2-28-07. Unaudited.
Note 4
Investment transactions
Purchases and proceeds from sales or maturities of securities, other than short-term securities and obligations of the U.S. government, during the period ended February 28, 2007, aggregated $36,953,929 and $33,224,591, respectively.
The cost of investments owned on February 28, 2007, including short-term investments, for federal income tax purposes, was $92,975,959. Gross unrealized appreciation of investments aggregated $8,549,874. The difference between book basis and tax basis net unrealized appreciation of investments is attributable primarily to the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on debt securities.
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
26
Board Consideration of and
Continuation of Investment Advisory
Agreement and Subadvisory
Agreement: John Hancock
High Yield Municipal Bond Fund
The Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”) requires the Board of Trustees (the “Board”) of John Hancock Municipal Securities Trust (the “Trust”), including a majority of the Trustees who have no direct or indirect interest in the investment advisory agreement and are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as defined in the 1940 Act (the “Independent Trustees”), annually to review and consider the continuation of: (i) the investment advisory agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”) with John Hancock Advisers, LLC (the “Adviser”) and (ii) the investment subadvisory agreement (the “Subadvisory Agreement”) with Sovereign Asset Management LLC (the “Subadviser”) for the John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (the “Fund”). The Advisory Agreement and the Subadvisory Agreement are collectively referred to as the “Advisory Agreeme nts.”
At meetings held on May 1–2 and June 5–6, 2006,1 the Board considered the factors and reached the conclusions described below relating to the selection of the Adviser and Subadviser and the continuation of the Advisory Agreements. During such meetings, the Board’s Contracts/ Operations Committee and the Independent Trustees also met in executive sessions with their independent legal counsel.
In evaluating the Advisory Agreements, the Board, including the Contracts/Operations Committee and the Independent Trustees, reviewed a broad range of information requested for this purpose by the Independent Trustees, including: (i) the investment performance of the Fund relative to a category of relevant funds (the “Category”) and a peer group of comparable funds (the “Peer Group”) each selected by Morningstar Inc. (“Morningstar”), an independent provider of investment company data, for a range of periods ended December 31, 2005; (ii) advisory and other fees incurred by, and the expense ratios of, the Fund relative to a Category and a Peer Group; (iii) the advisory fees of comparable portfolios of other clients of the Adviser and the Subadviser; (iv) the Adviser’s financial results and condition including its and certain of its a ffiliates’ profitability from services performed for the Fund; (v) breakpoints in the Fund’s and the Peer Group’s fees and information about economies of scale; (vi) the Adviser’s and Subadviser’s record of compliance with applicable laws and regulations with the Fund’s investment policies and restrictions and with the applicable Code of Ethics, and the structure and responsibilities of the Adviser’s and Subadviser’s compliance department; (vii) the background and experience of senior management and investment professionals and (viii) the nature, cost and character of advisory and non-investment management services provided by the Adviser and its affiliates and by the Subadviser.
The Board’s review and conclusions were based on a comprehensive consideration of all information presented to the Board and not the result of any single controlling factor. It was based on performance and other information as of December 31, 2005; facts may have changed between that date and the date of this shareholders report. The key factors considered by the Board and the conclusions reached are described below.
Nature, extent and quality of services
The Board considered the ability of the Adviser and the Subadviser, based on their resources, reputation and other attributes, to attract and retain qualified investment professionals, including research, advisory and supervisory personnel. The Board further considered the compliance programs and compliance records of the Adviser and Subadviser. In addition, the Board took into account the administrative services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and its affiliates.
Based on the above factors, together with those referenced below, the Board concluded that, within the context of its full deliberations, the nature, extent and quality of the investment advisory services provided to the Fund by the Adviser and Subadviser were sufficient to support renewal of the Advisory Agreements.
27
Fund performance
The Board considered the performance results for the Fund over various time periods ended December 31, 2005. The Board also considered these results in comparison to the performance of the Category, as well as the Fund’s benchmark index. Morningstar determined the Category and Peer Group for the Fund. The Board reviewed, with a representative of Morningstar, the methodology used by Morningstar to select the funds in the Category and the Peer Group.
The Board noted that the Fund’s performance during the periods under review was generally competitive with the performance of the Peer Group and Category medians and its benchmark index, the Lehman Brothers Municipal Bond Index. The Board noted that, for the 10-year period under review, the Fund’s performance was equal to the performance of the Peer Group median and lower than the performance of Category median and benchmark index. The Board noted that the Fund’s performance during the 3- and 5-year periods under review was higher than the performance of the benchmark index and lower than the performance of the Peer Group and Category medians. The Board viewed favorably that the more recent performance of the Fund for the 1-year period ended December 31, 2005, was higher than the Peer Group and Category medians and its benchmark index.
Investment advisory fee and subadvisory fee rates and expenses
The Board reviewed and considered the contractual investment advisory fee rate payable by the Fund to the Adviser for investment advisory services (the “Advisory Agreement Rate”). The Board received and considered information comparing the Advisory Agreement Rate with the advisory fees for the Peer Group and Category. The Board noted that the Advisory Agreement Rate was not appreciably higher than the median rate of the Peer Group and Category.
The Board received and considered expense information regarding the Fund’s various components, including advisory fees, distribution fees and fees other than advisory and distribution fees, including transfer agent fees, custodian fees and other miscellaneous fees (e.g., fees for accounting and legal services). The Board considered comparisons of these expenses to the Peer Group median. The Board also received and considered expense information regarding the Fund’s total operating expense ratio (“Expense Ratio”). The Board received and considered information comparing the Expense Ratio of the Fund to that of the Category and Peer Group medians. The Board noted that the Fund’s Expense Ratio was higher than the Category and Peer Group medians.
The Adviser also discussed the Morningstar data and rankings, and other relevant information, for the Fund. Based on the above-referenced considerations and other factors, the Board concluded that the Fund’s overall expense results and performance supported the re-approval of the Advisory Agreements.
The Board also received information about the investment subadvisory fee rate (the “Subadvisory Agreement Rate”) payable by the Adviser to the Subadviser for investment subadvisory services. The Board concluded that the Subadvisory Agreement Rate was fair and equitable, based on its consideration of the factors described here.
Profitability
The Board received and considered a detailed profitability analysis of the Adviser based on the Advisory Agreements, as well as on other relationships between the Fund and the Adviser and its affiliates, including the Subadviser. The Board concluded that, in light of the costs of providing investment management and other services to the Fund, the profits and other ancillary benefits reported by the Adviser were not unreasonable.
Economies of scale
The Board received and considered general information regarding economies of scale with respect to the management of the Fund, including the Fund’s ability to appropriately benefit from economies of scale under the Fund’s fee structure. The Board recognized the inherent limitations of any analysis of economies of scale, stemming largely from the Board’s understanding that most of the Adviser’s costs are not specific to individual
28
Funds, but rather are incurred across a variety of products and services.
To the extent the Board and the Adviser were able to identify actual or potential economies of scale from Fund-specific or allocated expenses, in order to ensure that any such economies continue to be reasonably shared with the Fund as its assets increase, the Adviser and the Board agreed to continue the existing breakpoints to the Advisory Agreement Rate.
Information about services to other clients
The Board also received information about the nature, extent and quality of services and fee rates offered by the Adviser and Subadviser to their other clients, including other registered investment companies, institutional investors and separate accounts. The Board concluded that the Advisory Agreement Rate and the Subadvisory Agreement Rate were not unreasonable, taking into account fee rates offered to others by the Adviser and Subadviser, respectively, after giving effect to differences in services.
Other benefits to the Adviser
The Board received information regarding potential “fall-out” or ancillary benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates as a result of the Adviser’s relationship with the Fund. Such benefits could include, among others, benefits directly attributable to the relationship of the Adviser with the Fund and benefits potentially derived from an increase in the business of the Adviser as a result of its relationship with the Fund (such as the ability to market to shareholders other financial products offered by the Adviser and its affiliates).
The Board also considered the effectiveness of the Adviser’s, Subadviser’s and Fund’s policies and procedures for complying with the requirements of the federal securities laws, including those relating to best execution of portfolio transactions and brokerage allocation.
Other factors and broader review
As discussed above, the Board reviewed detailed materials received from the Adviser and Subadviser as part of the annual re-approval process. The Board also regularly reviews and assesses the quality of the services that the Fund receives throughout the year. In this regard, the Board reviews reports of the Adviser at least quarterly, which include, among other things, a detailed portfolio review, detailed fund performance reports and compliance reports. In addition, the Board meets with portfolio managers and senior investment officers at various times throughout the year.
After considering the above-described factors and based on its deliberations and its evaluation of the information described above, the Board concluded that approval of the continuation of the Advisory Agreements for the Fund was in the best interest of the Fund and its shareholders. Accordingly, the Board unanimously approved the continuation of the Advisory Agreements.
1 The Board previously considered information about the Subadvisory Agreement at the September and December 2005 Board meetings in connection with the Adviser’s reorganization.
29
For more information
The Fund’s proxy voting policies, procedures and records are available without charge, upon request:
By phone | On the Fund’s Web site | On the SEC’s Web site |
1-800-225-5291 | www.jhfunds.com/proxy | www.sec.gov |
|
Trustees | Francis V. Knox, Jr. | Custodian |
Ronald R. Dion, Chairman | Chief Compliance Officer | The Bank of New York |
James R. Boyle† | | One Wall Street |
James F. Carlin | Gordon M. Shone | New York, NY 10286 |
Richard P. Chapman, Jr.* | Treasurer | |
William H. Cunningham | | Transfer agent |
Charles L. Ladner* | John G. Vrysen | John Hancock Signature |
Dr. John A. Moore* | Chief Financial Officer | Services, Inc. |
Patti McGill Peterson* | | 1 John Hancock Way, |
Steven R. Pruchansky | Investment adviser | Suite 1000 |
*Members of the Audit Committee | John Hancock Advisers, LLC | Boston, MA 02217-1000 |
†Non-Independent Trustee | 601 Congress Street | |
| Boston, MA 02210-2805 | Legal counsel |
Officers | | Kirkpatrick & Lockhart |
Keith F. Hartstein | Subadviser | Preston Gates Ellis LLP |
President and | MFC Global Investment | 1 Lincoln Street |
Chief Executive Officer | Management (U.S.), LLC | Boston, MA 02110-2950 |
| 101 Huntington Avenue | |
Thomas M. Kinzler | Boston, MA 02199 | |
Secretary and | | |
Chief Legal Officer | Principal distributor | |
| John Hancock Funds, LLC | |
| 601 Congress Street | |
| Boston, MA 02210-2805 | |
The Fund’s investment objective, risks, charges and expenses are included in the prospectus and should be considered carefully before investing. For a prospectus, call your financial professional, call John Hancock Funds at 1-800-225-5291 or visit the Fund’s Web site at www.jhfunds.com. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.
How to contact us | |
|
Internet | www.jhfunds.com | |
|
Mail | Regular mail: | Express mail: |
| John Hancock | John Hancock |
| Signature Services, Inc. | Signature Services, Inc. |
| 1 John Hancock Way, Suite 1000 | Mutual Fund Image Operations |
| Boston, MA 02217-1000 | 380 Stuart Street |
| | Boston, MA 02116 |
|
Phone | Customer service representatives | 1-800-225-5291 |
| EASI-Line | 1-800-338-8080 |
| TDD line | 1-800-554-6713 |
A listing of month-end portfolio holdings is available on our Web site, www.jhfunds.com. A more detailed portfolio holdings summary is available on a quarterly basis 60 days after the fiscal quarter on our Web site or upon request by calling 1-800-225-5291, or on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Web site, www.sec.gov.
32
J O H N H A N C O C K F A M I L Y O F F U N D S
EQUITY | INTERNATIONAL |
Balanced Fund | Greater China Opportunities Fund |
Classic Value Fund | International Allocation Portfolio |
Classic Value Fund II | International Classic Value Fund |
Classic Value Mega Cap Fund | International Core Fund |
Core Equity Fund | International Fund |
Focused Equity Fund | International Growth Fund |
Global Shareholder Yield Fund | |
Growth Fund | INCOME |
Growth Opportunities Fund | Bond Fund |
Growth Trends Fund | Government Income Fund |
Intrinsic Value Fund | High Yield Fund |
Large Cap Equity Fund | Investment Grade Bond Fund |
Large Cap Select Fund | Strategic Income Fund |
Mid Cap Equity Fund | |
Mid Cap Growth Fund | TAX-FREE INCOME |
Multi Cap Growth Fund | California Tax-Free Income Fund |
Small Cap Equity Fund | High Yield Municipal Bond Fund |
Small Cap Fund | Massachusetts Tax-Free Income Fund |
Small Cap Intrinsic Value Fund | New York Tax-Free Income Fund |
Sovereign Investors Fund | Tax-Free Bond Fund |
U.S. Core Fund | |
U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund | MONEY MARKET |
Value Opportunities Fund | Money Market Fund |
| U.S. Government Cash Reserve |
ASSET ALLOCATION | |
Allocation Core Portfolio | CLOSED-END |
Allocation Growth + Value Portfolio | Bank and Thrift Opportunity Fund |
Lifecycle 2010 Portfolio | Financial Trends Fund, Inc. |
Lifecycle 2015 Portfolio | Income Securities Trust |
Lifecycle 2020 Portfolio | Investors Trust |
Lifecycle 2025 Portfolio | Patriot Global Dividend Fund |
Lifecycle 2030 Portfolio | Patriot Preferred Dividend Fund |
Lifecycle 2035 Portfolio | Patriot Premium Dividend Fund I |
Lifecycle 2040 Portfolio | Patriot Premium Dividend Fund II |
Lifecycle 2045 Portfolio | Patriot Select Dividend Trust |
Lifecycle Retirement Portfolio | Preferred Income Fund |
Lifestyle Aggressive Portfolio | Preferred Income II Fund |
Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio | Preferred Income III Fund |
Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund |
Lifestyle Growth Portfolio | |
Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio | |
|
SECTOR | |
Financial Industries Fund | |
Health Sciences Fund | |
Real Estate Fund | |
Regional Bank Fund | |
Technology Fund | |
Technology Leaders Fund | |
For more complete information on any John Hancock Fund and an Open-End fund prospectus, which includes charges and expenses, call your financial professional, or John Hancock Funds at 1-800-225-5291 for Open-End fund information and 1-800-852-0218 for Closed-End fund information. Please read the Open-End fund prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/773b9/773b963250aa2a0d667b7d587aabba702747296b" alt=""
1-800-225-5291
1-800-554-6713 TDD
1-800-338-8080 EASI-Line
www.jhfunds. com
Now available: electronic delivery
www.jhfunds.com/edelivery
| 590SA 2/07 |
This report is for the information of the shareholders of John Hancock High Yield Municipal Bond Fund. | 4/07 |
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
As of the end of the period, February 28, 2007, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, that applies to its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (respectively, the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and the principal accounting officer, the “Senior Financial Officers”). A copy of the code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
Not applicable at this time.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Not applicable at this time.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
Not applicable at this time.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There were no material changes to previously disclosed John Hancock Funds – Governance Committee Charter.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) Based upon their evaluation of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this Form N-CSR, the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures provide reasonable assurance that the material information required to be disclosed by the registrant on this report is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms.
(b) There were no changes in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal half-year (the registrant's second fiscal half-
year in the case of an annual report) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.
(a)(1) Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers is attached.
(a)(2) Separate certifications for the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.
(b) Separate certifications for the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached. The certifications furnished pursuant to this paragraph are not deemed to be "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certifications are not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates them by reference.
(c)(1) Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders is attached. See attached “John Hancock Funds – Governance Committee Charter”.
(c)(2) Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures are attached.
(c)(3) Contact person at the registrant.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
John Hancock Municipal Series Trust
By: /s/ Keith F. Hartstein
-------------------------------------
Keith F. Hartstein
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: April 30, 2007
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: /s/ Keith F. Hartstein
-------------------------------------
Keith F. Hartstein
President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: April 30, 2007
By: /s/ John G. Vrysen
-------------------------------------
John G. Vrysen
Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 30, 2007