UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number | 811 - 6395 |
| |
| DREYFUS NEW YORK MUNICIPAL CASH MANAGEMENT | |
| (Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter) | |
| | |
| c/o The Dreyfus Corporation 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 | |
| (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) | |
| | |
| Janette E. Farragher, Esq. 200 Park Avenue New York, New York 10166 | |
| (Name and address of agent for service) | |
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: | (212) 922-6000 |
| |
Date of fiscal year end: | 1/31 | |
Date of reporting period: | 7/31/12 | |
| | | | | | |
FORM N-CSR
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7996/f7996a21664b2699c225121ab83f9e7b308212a0" alt=""
| |
Contents | |
|
The Funds | |
Letter to Shareholders (Taxable) | 3 |
Letter to Shareholders (Tax Exempt) | 5 |
Understanding Your Fund’s Expenses | 7 |
Comparing Your Fund’s Expenses | |
With Those of Other Funds | 9 |
Statements of Investments | 11 |
Statements of Assets and Liabilities | 52 |
Statements of Operations | 55 |
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | 57 |
Financial Highlights | 62 |
Notes to Financial Statements | 73 |
Information About the Renewal | |
of Each Fund’s Management Agreement | 82 |
For More Information
Back cover
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio manager only through the end of the period covered and do not necessarily represent the views of Dreyfus or any other person in the Dreyfus organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Dreyfus disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Dreyfus fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Dreyfus fund.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f74d2/f74d279c40c2c1d8999c2806c6a5444268ce016f" alt=""
Dreyfus Cash Management Funds
The Funds
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9373/c9373e9c566f97e7cf1aad7cce92f6930164b75e" alt=""
LETTER TO
SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Shareholders:
This semiannual report for Dreyfus Cash Management Funds (Taxable) covers the six-month period ended July 31, 2012. Over the reporting period, these five taxable funds produced the following annualized yields and, taking into account the effects of compounding, the following annualized effective yields:1,2
| | |
| | Annualized |
| Annualized | Effective |
| Yield (%) | Yield (%) |
Dreyfus Cash Management | | |
Institutional Shares | 0.10 | 0.10 |
Investor Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Administrative Shares | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Participant Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Agency Shares | 0.03 | 0.03 |
Dreyfus Government | | |
Cash Management | | |
Institutional Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Investor Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Administrative Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Participant Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Agency Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Dreyfus Government | | |
Prime Cash Management | | |
Institutional Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Investor Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Administrative Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Participant Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Agency Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency | | |
Cash Management | | |
Institutional Shares | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Investor Shares | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Administrative Shares | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Participant Shares | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Service Shares | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Select Shares | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Agency Shares | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Premier Shares | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Dreyfus Treasury Prime | | |
Cash Management | | |
Institutional Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Investor Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Administrative Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Participant Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Agency Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Yields of money market instruments remained near historical lows over the reporting period as the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) left short-term interest rates unchanged in a range between 0% and 0.25% amid erratic economic growth.
Economic Recovery Sputtered in the Spring
The U.S. unemployment rate had declined to 8.3% with a net gain of 243,000 jobs, and manufacturing activity had accelerated in the weeks just prior to the start of the reporting period, signaling that an economic recovery was gaining traction. In February 2012, the private sector added another 233,000 jobs and the unemployment rate held steady. What’s more, retail and food service sales climbed 1.1%, which many saw as a promising sign for a domestic economy fueled mainly by consumers.
The recovery appeared to continue in March. Despite a decrease to 120,000 new jobs created during the month, the unemployment rate inched lower to 8.2%.The manufacturing and service sectors expanded for the 32nd and 27th consecutive months, respectively. However, gasoline prices surged higher in March, contributing to a modest decline in consumer confidence.
The expansion of the U.S. economy appeared to moderate in April amid mixed economic data. Only 77,000 jobs were added to the labor force during the month, but the unemployment rate dipped slightly to 8.1%, its lowest reading in more than three years. Manufacturing activity continued to increase, while the service sector posted relatively sluggish growth. It later was announced that U.S. GDP growth slowed to a 2.0% annualized rate over the first quarter of 2011, primarily due to significant cuts in government spending.
May brought more disappointing news, including another subpar month of job creation and an uptick in the unemployment rate to 8.2%. While manufacturing activity continued to expand, it did so at a
The Funds 3
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS (continued)
slower rate. Meanwhile, a resurgent debt crisis in Europe dominated the headlines when austerity measures encountered political resistance in some countries, including Greece, threatening the region’s economic prospects.
June saw more mixed economic data. On one hand, the manufacturing sector contracted for the first time in three years, with weakness especially evident in new orders placed during the month. On the other hand, the U.S. housing market showed signs of life when home prices climbed for the first time in seven months. In addition, new unemployment claims fell over the latter part of the month, and many analysts were encouraged when European policymakers adopted new measures to shore up the region’s troubled banking system. For the second quarter of 2012 overall, the U.S. Department of Commerce estimated that economic growth slowed to a 1.5% annualized rate.
The subpar recovery inched ahead in July, when total nonfarm payroll employment rose by 163,000, more than most analysts expected, but the unemployment rate moved slightly higher to 8.3% as more people entered or reentered the workforce. Meanwhile, the manufacturing sector contracted for the second straight month, and economists grew increasingly concerned about the potential economic consequences of a major drought affecting crops throughout the Midwest.
Rates Likely to Stay Low
As has been the case for the past several years, yields of money market instruments remained near zero percent throughout the reporting period. In addition, yield differences along the market’s maturity spectrum remained relatively narrow, so it made little sense to incur the additional risks that longer-dated securities typically entail.
The possibility of new regulations from the Securities Exchange Commission governing money market funds had injected a degree of uncertainty into the market, and we responded by placing greater emphasis on liquidity.That concern has been abated temporarily with SEC Chairman Schapiro’s reform proposals having been tabled for the time being.We reduced the funds’ weighted average maturity to a position we consider modestly shorter than market averages, and we intensified our focus on well-established issuers that historically have demonstrated good liquidity characteristics.We found a number of issuers meeting our criteria in Australia, Canada and Japan, but relatively few in Europe.
Despite recent swings in the economic data, the Fed has repeatedly stated its intention to keep short-term interest rates near historical lows at least through late 2014.The Fed also recently signaled that it may take additional steps to stimulate economic growth, potentially including a new round of quantitative easing. Therefore, we intend to maintain the fund’s focus on quality and liquidity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2410e/2410e353e1b7dac8b452b323e9405f5c9ea5204e" alt=""
August 15, 2012
New York, N.Y.
| An investment in the funds is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency.Although the funds seek to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the fund. |
| Short-term corporate, asset-backed securities holdings and municipal securities holdings (as applicable), while rated in the highest rating category by one or more NRSRO (or unrated, if deemed of comparable quality by Dreyfus), involve credit and liquidity risks and risk of principal loss. |
1 | Annualized effective yield is based upon dividends declared daily and reinvested monthly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
| Yields fluctuate. |
2 | Yields provided reflect the absorption of certain fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking, which is voluntary and temporary, not contractual, and can be terminated at any time without notice. Had these expenses not been absorbed, fund yields would have been lower, and in some cases, 7-day yields during the reporting period would have been negative absent the expense absorption. |
4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddd1/7ddd1f9a62f5658ed83818eacd629c555377ed76" alt=""
LETTER TO
SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Shareholder:
We are pleased to present the semiannual report for Dreyfus Cash Management Funds (Tax Exempt). For the six-month period ended July 31, 2012, these five tax-exempt money market funds produced the following annualized yields and annualized effective yields:1,2
| | |
| | Annualized |
| Annualized | Effective |
| Yield (%) | Yield (%) |
Dreyfus Municipal | | |
Cash Management Plus | | |
Institutional Shares | 0.02 | 0.02 |
Investor Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Administrative Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Participant Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Agency Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Dreyfus New York Municipal | | |
Cash Management | | |
Institutional Shares | 0.02 | 0.02 |
Investor Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Administrative Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Participant Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Agency Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | | |
Cash Management | | |
Institutional Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Investor Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Administrative Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Participant Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free | | |
Municipal Cash Management | | |
Institutional Shares | 0.02 | 0.02 |
Investor Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Administrative Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Participant Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Agency Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free | | |
Municipal Cash Management | | |
Institutional Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Investor Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Administrative Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Participant Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Classic Shares | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The U.S. economic recovery proved erratic during the reporting period, producing heightened volatility in most financial markets. However, yields of tax-exempt money market instruments remained stable near zero percent as the Federal Reserve Board (the “Fed”) left short-term interest rates unchanged at historically low levels.
Economic Sentiment Shifted, but Yields Remained Low
The reporting period began in the midst of an apparent economic recovery, as the European Union took steps to address a persistent debt crisis and the U.S. unemployment rate dropped sharply. However, disappointing employment and manufacturing data in the United States and the spread of fiscal instability in Europe during the spring of 2012 soon reduced expectations for a more robust recovery. Despite these changes in the economic outlook, the Fed maintained the monetary policy stance it first established in December 2008, leaving the overnight federal funds rate in a range between 0% and 0.25%. Consequently, municipal money market yields remained near zero percent throughout the reporting period.
The market also was influenced by changing supply-and-demand dynamics. Demand for municipal money market instruments proved robust during the reporting period. Narrow yield differences along the market’s maturity range and attractive after-tax yields compared to taxable money market instruments attracted individual investors as well as institutions that typically participate in taxable and longer term bond markets. Meanwhile, the supply of newly issued tax-exempt money market instruments remained relatively steady as highly rated banks filled a gap left by struggling European financial institutions in issuing the letters of credit that typically back vari-
The Funds 5
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS (continued)
able-rate demand notes (VRDNs). Consequently, yields of VRDNs remained in a relatively narrow trading range.
From a credit-quality perspective, most states have achieved several consecutive quarters of growth in personal income tax and sales tax revenues, and many states and municipalities have reduced spending to balance their budgets. In New York, fiscal conditions have improved, and the state has enacted a number of reforms to its tax code while tax receipts have increased amid greater spending discipline. California has made less progress toward fiscal stability.The state has reduced spending and implemented structural improvements to its budget, but tax receipts have fallen short of budgeted projections.
A Credit-Conscious Investment Posture
We have continued to maintain a careful and well-researched approach to credit selection. During the reporting period, we emphasized state general obligation bonds; essential service revenue bonds issued by water, sewer and electric enterprises; and certain local credits from issuers with strong financial positions and stable tax bases. We generally continued to shy away from instruments issued by localities that depend heavily on state aid.We also maintained a conservative position regarding interest rates, setting the fund’s weighted average maturity in a range that was roughly in line with industry averages.
Outlook Clouded by Ongoing Economic Uncertainty
We are cautiously optimistic regarding the prospects for economic growth over the remainder of 2012. Strains in the global financial markets have continued to pose significant challenges, but the Fed expects a moderate pace of U.S. economic growth and a gradu-
ally declining unemployment rate. In addition, the Fed has signaled repeatedly that it is prepared to maintain short-term interest rates near current levels through late 2014, and it may take further action to stimulate economic growth, potentially including a new round of quantitative easing.With money market yields likely to remain near historical lows for some time to come, we believe that the prudent course continues to be an emphasis on preservation of capital and liquidity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67c2e/67c2e10f00530c034b4bbcdac67a78466b136124" alt=""
August 15, 2012
New York, NY
| An investment in the funds is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any other government agency.Although the funds seek to preserve the value of your investment at $1.00 per share, it is possible to lose money by investing in the funds. |
| Short-term corporate, asset-backed securities holdings and municipal securities holdings (as applicable), while rated in the highest rating category by one or more NRSRO (or unrated, if deemed of comparable quality by Dreyfus), involve credit and liquidity risks and risk of principal loss. |
1 | Annualized effective yield is based upon dividends declared daily and reinvested monthly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. |
| Yields fluctuate. For the national funds, income may be subject to state and local taxes. For the NewYork and California funds, income may be subject to state and local taxes for out-of-state residents. For each non- AMT-Free fund, some income may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT). |
2 | Yields provided reflect the absorption of certain fund expenses by The Dreyfus Corporation pursuant to an undertaking, which is voluntary and temporary, not contractual, and can be terminated at any time without notice. Had these expenses not been absorbed, the funds’ yields would have been lower, and in some cases, 7-day yields during the reporting period would have been negative absent the expense absorption. |
6
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited)
As a mutual fund investor, you pay ongoing expenses, such as management fees and other expenses. Using the information below, you can estimate how these expenses affect your investment and compare them with the expenses of other funds.You also may pay one-time transaction expenses, including sales charges (loads) and redemptions fees, which are not shown in this section and would have resulted in higher total expenses. For more information, see your fund’s prospectus or talk to your financial adviser.
Review your fund’s expenses
The table below shows the expenses you would have paid on a $1,000 investment in each class of each fund from February 1, 2012 to July 31, 2012. It also shows how much a $1,000 investment would be worth at the close of the period, assuming actual returns and expenses.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended July 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | Institutional | | Investor Administrative | | Participant | | Service | | Select | | Agency | | Premier | Classic |
Dreyfus Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.54 | $ | 1.49 | $ | 1.54 | | — | | — | $ | 1.34 | | — | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,000.50 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | | — | | — | $ | 1,000.20 | | — | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .21 | | .31 | | .30 | | .31 | | — | | — | | .27 | | — | — |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Government Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | .75 | $ | .75 | $ | .75 | $ | .75 | | — | | — | $ | .75 | | — | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | | — | | — | $ | 1,000.00 | | — | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .15 | | .15 | | .15 | | .15 | | — | | — | | .15 | | — | — |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Government Prime | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | .55 | $ | .55 | $ | .55 | $ | .55 | | — | | — | $ | .60 | | — | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | | — | | — | $ | 1,000.00 | | — | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .11 | | .11 | | .11 | | .11 | | — | | — | | .12 | | — | — |
Dreyfus Treasury & | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agency Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | .60 | $ | .60 | $ | .60 | $ | .55 | $ | .50 | $ | .55 | $ | .60 | $ | .60 | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,000.10 | $ | 1,000.10 | $ | 1,000.10 | $ | 1,000.10 | $ | 1,000.10 | $ | 1,000.10 | $ | 1,000.10 | $ | 1,000.10 | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .12 | | .12 | | .12 | | .11 | | .10 | | .11 | | .12 | | .12 | — |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Treasury Prime | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | .40 | $ | .40 | $ | .40 | $ | .40 | | — | | — | $ | .45 | | — | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | | — | | — | $ | 1,000.00 | | — | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .08 | | .08 | | .08 | | .08 | | — | | — | | .09 | | — | — |
The Funds 7
UNDERSTANDING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment (continued) | | | | | | | | | |
assuming actual returns for the six months ended July 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | Institutional | | Investor Administrative | | Participant | Service | Select | | Agency | Premier | | Classic |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management Plus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.19 | $ | 1.29 | $ | 1.29 | $ | 1.29 | — | — | $ | 1.29 | — | | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,000.10 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | — | — | $ | 1,000.00 | — | | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .24 | | .26 | | .26 | | .26 | — | — | | .26 | — | | — |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.09 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 1.19 | — | — | $ | 1.19 | — | | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,000.10 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | — | — | $ | 1,000.00 | — | | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .22 | | .23 | | .24 | | .24 | — | — | | .24 | — | | — |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tax Exempt Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.04 | $ | 1.04 | — | — | | — | — | | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | — | — | | — | — | | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .21 | | .21 | | .21 | | .21 | — | — | | — | — | | — |
Dreyfus California | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AMT-Free | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.09 | $ | 1.14 | $ | 1.19 | $ | 1.14 | — | — | $ | 1.24 | — | | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,000.10 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | — | — | $ | 1,000.00 | — | | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .22 | | .23 | | .24 | | .23 | — | — | | .25 | — | | — |
Dreyfus New York | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AMT-Free | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.34 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 1.34 | $ | 1.34 | — | — | | — | — | $ | 1.34 |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,000.00 | — | — | | — | — | $ | 1,000.00 |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .27 | | .27 | | .27 | | .27 | — | — | | — | — | | .27 |
† Expenses are equal to each fund’s annualized expense ratios as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period).
8
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES
WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited)
Using the SEC’s method to compare expenses
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has established guidelines to help investors assess fund expenses. Per these guidelines, the table below shows your fund’s expenses based on a $1,000 investment, assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return.You can use this information to compare the ongoing expenses (but not transaction expenses or total cost) of investing in the fund with those of other funds. All mutual fund shareholder reports will provide this information to help you make this comparison. Please note that you cannot use this information to estimate your actual ending account balance and expenses paid during the period.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended July 31, 2012 | | | | | | | |
|
| | Institutional | | Investor Administrative | | Participant | | Service | | Select | | Agency | | Premier | Classic |
Dreyfus Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.06 | $ | 1.56 | $ | 1.51 | | $ | 1.56 | | — | | — | $ | 1.36 | | — | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,023.82 | $ | 1,023.32 | $ | 1,023.37 | $ | 1,023.32 | | — | | — | $ | 1,023.52 | | — | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .21 | | .31 | | .30 | | | .31 | | — | | — | | .27 | | — | — |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Government Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | .75 | $ | .75 | $ | .75 | | $ | .75 | | — | | — | $ | .75 | | — | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,024.12 | $ | 1,024.12 | $ | 1,024.12 | $ | 1,024.12 | | — | | — | $ | 1,024.12 | | — | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .15 | | .15 | | .15 | | | .15 | | — | | — | | .15 | | — | — |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Government Prime | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | .55 | $ | .55 | $ | .55 | | $ | .55 | | — | | — | $ | .60 | | — | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,024.32 | $ | 1,024.32 | $ | 1,024.32 | $ | 1,024.32 | | — | | — | $ | 1,024.27 | | — | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .11 | | .11 | | .11 | | | .11 | | — | | — | | .12 | | — | — |
Dreyfus Treasury & | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Agency Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | .60 | $ | .60 | $ | .60 | | $ | .55 | $ | .50 | $ | .55 | $ | .60 | $ | .60 | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,024.27 | $ | 1,024.27 | $ | 1,024.27 | $ | 1,024.32 | $ | 1,024.37 | $ | 1,024.32 | $ | 1,024.27 | $ | 1,024.27 | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .12 | | .12 | | .12 | | | .11 | | .10 | | .11 | | .12 | | .12 | — |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Treasury Prime | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | .40 | $ | .40 | $ | .40 | | $ | .40 | | — | | — | $ | .45 | | — | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,024.47 | $ | 1,024.47 | $ | 1,024.47 | $ | 1,024.47 | | — | | — | $ | 1,024.42 | | — | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .08 | | .08 | | .08 | | | .08 | | — | | — | | .09 | | — | — |
The Funds 9
COMPARING YOUR FUND’S EXPENSES WITH THOSE OF OTHER FUNDS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment (continued) | | | | | | | | | | |
assuming a hypothetical 5% annualized return for the six months ended July 31, 2012 | | | | | | | |
|
| | Institutional | | Investor Administrative | | Participant | Service | Select | | Agency | Premier | | Classic |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management Plus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.21 | $ | 1.31 | $ | 1.31 | | $ | 1.31 | — | — | $ | 1.31 | — | | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,023.67 | $ | 1,023.57 | $ | 1,023.57 | $ | 1,023.57 | — | — | $ | 1,023.57 | — | | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .24 | | .26 | | .26 | | | .26 | — | — | | .26 | — | | — |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
New York | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.11 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 1.21 | | $ | 1.21 | — | — | $ | 1.21 | — | | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,023.77 | $ | 1,023.72 | $ | 1,023.67 | $ | 1,023.67 | — | — | $ | 1,023.67 | — | | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .22 | | .23 | | .24 | | | .24 | — | — | | .24 | — | | — |
Dreyfus | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Tax Exempt Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.06 | $ | 1.06 | $ | 1.06 | | $ | 1.06 | — | — | | — | — | | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,023.82 | $ | 1,023.82 | $ | 1,023.82 | $ | 1,023.82 | — | — | | — | — | | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .21 | | .21 | | .21 | | | .21 | — | — | | — | — | | — |
Dreyfus California | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AMT-Free | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.11 | $ | 1.16 | $ | 1.21 | | $ | 1.16 | — | — | $ | 1.26 | — | | — |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,023.77 | $ | 1,023.72 | $ | 1,023.67 | $ | 1,023.72 | — | — | $ | 1,023.62 | — | | — |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .22 | | .23 | | .24 | | | .23 | — | — | | .25 | — | | — |
Dreyfus New York | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AMT-Free | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses paid | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
per $1,000† | | $ | 1.36 | $ | 1.36 | $ | 1.36 | | $ | 1.36 | — | — | | — | — | $ | 1.36 |
Ending value | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(after expenses) | $ | 1,023.52 | $ | 1,023.52 | $ | 1,023.52 | $ | 1,023.52 | — | — | | — | — | $ | 1,023.52 |
Annualized | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
expense ratio (%) | | | .27 | | .27 | | .27 | | | .27 | — | — | | — | — | | .27 |
† Expenses are equal to each fund’s annualized expense ratios as shown above, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 182/366 (to reflect the one-half year period).
10
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | |
| Principal | | |
Dreyfus Cash Management | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Negotiable Bank Certificates of Deposit—28.9% | | | |
Bank of Nova Scotia (Yankee) | | | |
0.56%, 8/1/12 | 500,000,000 | a | 500,000,000 |
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi Ltd. (Yankee) | | | |
0.36%, 10/5/12—10/11/12 | 1,150,000,000 | | 1,150,000,000 |
Barclays Bank PLC (Yankee) | | | |
0.79%, 8/16/12 | 425,000,000 | a | 425,000,000 |
Branch Banking & Trust Co. | | | |
0.28%, 11/19/12 | 120,000,000 | | 120,000,000 |
Chase Bank USA | | | |
0.18%, 8/20/12 | 250,000,000 | | 250,000,000 |
Credit Suisse New York (Yankee) | | | |
0.35%—0.52%, 10/2/12—10/10/12 | 890,000,000 | | 890,000,000 |
Mizuho Corporate Bank (Yankee) | | | |
0.35%, 8/2/12 | 300,000,000 | | 300,000,000 |
National Australia Bank (Yankee) | | | |
0.33%—0.52%, 8/2/12—8/7/12 | 1,250,000,000 | a | 1,250,000,000 |
Norinchukin Bank (Yankee) | | | |
0.40%—0.42%, 9/28/12—10/18/12 | 1,200,000,000 | | 1,200,000,000 |
Rabobank Nederland (Yankee) | | | |
0.31%, 9/4/12 | 50,000,000 | | 50,003,773 |
Royal Bank of Canada (Yankee) | | | |
0.54%, 8/1/12 | 240,000,000 | a | 240,000,000 |
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (Yankee) | | | |
0.33%—0.50%, 10/16/12—10/26/12 | 600,000,000 | b | 600,000,000 |
Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co. (Yankee) | | | |
0.42%, 9/4/12 | 350,000,000 | b | 350,000,000 |
Westpac Banking Corp. (Yankee) | | | |
0.52%, 8/28/12 | 300,000,000 | a,b | 300,000,000 |
Total Negotiable Bank Certificates of Deposit | | | |
(cost $7,625,003,773) | | | 7,625,003,773 |
|
Commercial Paper—15.2% | | | |
ASB Finance Ltd. | | | |
0.51%, 8/13/12 | 75,000,000 | a,b | 75,000,000 |
Bank of Nova Scotia | | | |
0.09%, 8/1/12 | 500,000,000 | | 500,000,000 |
Barclays US CCP Funding LLC | | | |
0.35%, 8/1/12—8/7/12 | 300,000,000 | b | 299,994,167 |
General Electric Capital Corp. | | | |
0.38%—0.40%, 12/7/12—1/11/13 | 435,000,000 | | 434,302,100 |
Mizuho Funding LLC | | | |
0.36%—0.38%, 10/9/12—10/16/12 | 750,000,000 | b | 749,437,917 |
Nordea North America Inc. | | | |
0.59%, 8/15/12 | 150,000,000 | | 149,965,583 |
Rabobank USA Financial Corp. | | | |
0.31%, 9/4/12 | 31,200,000 | | 31,190,865 |
The Funds 11
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | |
| | Principal | | |
| Dreyfus Cash Management (continued) | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
| Commercial Paper (continued) | | | |
| Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation | | | |
| 0.50%, 11/1/12 | 600,000,000 | b | 599,233,333 |
| Toyota Motor Credit Corp. | | | |
| 0.43%, 8/20/12—8/22/12 | 350,000,000 | | 349,914,597 |
| Westpac Banking Corp. | | | |
| 0.57%—0.58%, 8/1/12 | 800,000,000 | a,b | 800,000,000 |
| Total Commercial Paper | | | |
| (cost $3,989,038,562) | | | 3,989,038,562 |
|
| Asset-Backed Commercial Paper—4.5% | | | |
| Atlantis One Funding Corp. | | | |
| 0.36%—0.38%, 9/10/12—10/9/12 | 630,000,000 | b | 629,688,900 |
| CAFCO | | | |
| 0.48%, 8/15/12 | 150,000,000 | b | 149,972,000 |
| CHARTA | | | |
| 0.42%—0.49%, 8/13/12—8/23/12 | 200,000,000 | b | 199,958,000 |
| CIESCO LLC | | | |
| 0.49%, 8/13/12 | 100,000,000 | b | 99,983,667 |
| CRC Funding | | | |
| 0.42%, 8/23/12 | 100,000,000 | b | 99,974,333 |
| Total Asset-Backed Commercial Paper | | | |
| (cost $1,179,576,900) | | | 1,179,576,900 |
|
| Time Deposits—19.4% | | | |
| Bank of America N.A. (Grand Cayman) | | | |
| 0.01%, 8/1/12 | 499,000,000 | | 499,000,000 |
| DnB Bank (Grand Cayman) | | | |
| 0.15%, 8/1/12 | 1,200,000,000 | | 1,200,000,000 |
| Lloyds TSB Bank (London) | | | |
| 0.12%, 8/1/12 | 500,000,000 | | 500,000,000 |
| Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken (Grand Cayman) | | | |
| 0.15%, 8/1/12 | 800,000,000 | | 800,000,000 |
| Swedbank (Grand Cayman) | | | |
| 0.16%, 8/1/12 | 1,200,000,000 | | 1,200,000,000 |
| U.S. Bank NA (Grand Cayman) | | | |
| 0.19%, 8/1/12 | 915,000,000 | | 915,000,000 |
| Total Time Deposits | | | |
| (cost $5,114,000,000) | | | 5,114,000,000 |
12
| | | |
| Principal | | |
Dreyfus Cash Management (continued) | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
U.S. Government Agencies—6.6% | | | |
Federal Farm Credit Bank | | | |
0.24%, 11/18/13 | 150,000,000 | a | 149,980,323 |
Federal Home Loan Bank | | | |
0.001%-0.32%, 8/1/12 | 425,000,000 | a | 424,978,743 |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. | | | |
0.15%-0.37%, 8/1/12 | 800,000,000 | a,c | 799,878,947 |
Federal National Mortgage Association | | | |
0.36%, 8/1/12 | 350,000,000 | a,c | 349,975,653 |
Total U.S. Government Agencies | | | |
(cost $1,724,813,666) | | | 1,724,813,666 |
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bills—1.1% | | | |
0.08%—0.09%, 9/13/12—10/18/12 | | | |
(cost $299,959,421) | 300,000,000 | | 299,959,421 |
|
|
U.S. Treasury Notes—6.2% | | | |
0.14%—0.19%, 10/31/12—5/15/13 | | | |
(cost $1,620,027,081) | 1,605,500,000 | | 1,620,027,081 |
|
|
Repurchase Agreements—18.0% | | | |
ABN AMRO Bank N.V. | | | |
0.16%, dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $2,200,009,778 | | | |
(fully collateralized by $2,228,079,200 U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.13%-2.25%, | | | |
due 7/31/13-11/30/17, value $2,244,000,020) | 2,200,000,000 | | 2,200,000,000 |
Barclays Capital, Inc. | | | |
0.17%, dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $562,002,654 | | | |
(fully collateralized by $234,802,000 U.S. Treasury Bonds, 4.63%, | | | |
due 2/15/40, value $340,493,212 and $205,949,400 U.S. Treasury | | | |
Notes, 2.75%, due 2/15/19, value $232,746,868) | 562,000,000 | | 562,000,000 |
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. | | | |
0.20%, dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $350,001,944 | | | |
(fully collateralized by $200,000 Certificates of Deposit, 0%, due 6/10/13, | | | |
value $199,671 and $357,198,270 Commercial Paper, 0%, | | | |
due 8/1/12-10/4/14, value $356,800,329) | 350,000,000 | | 350,000,000 |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | | |
0.27%, dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $100,000,750 | | | |
(fully collateralized by $90,805,369 Corporate Bonds, 1.22%-8.20%, | | | |
due 1/15/18-12/15/50, value $103,003,060) | 100,000,000 | | 100,000,000 |
The Funds 13
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | |
| Principal | | |
Dreyfus Cash Management (continued) | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Repurchase Agreements (continued) | | | |
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. | | | |
0.16%, dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $520,002,311 | | | |
(fully collateralized by $520,933,800 U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.38%-1.50%, | | | |
due 7/31/13-7/31/16, value $530,400,068) | 520,000,000 | | 520,000,000 |
RBC Capital Markets | | | |
0.13%-0.275%, dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $1,010,004,764 (fully | | | |
collateralized by $439,468,899 Corporate Bonds, 0%-4.90%, due 2/21/17-7/1/47, | | | |
value $267,800,001, $254,753,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 0.38%, | | | |
due 8/28/14, value $255,000,323, $169,554,400 U.S. Treasury Bills, | | | |
due 1/3/13-5/2/13, value $169,375,548 and $337,830,000 U.S. Treasury | | | |
Notes, 0.25-0.88%, due 4/30/14-4/30/17, value $340,624,467) | 1,010,000,000 | | 1,010,000,000 |
Total Repurchase Agreements | | | |
(cost $4,742,000,000) | | | 4,742,000,000 |
|
Total Investments (cost $26,294,419,403) | 99.9 | % | 26,294,419,403 |
|
Cash and Receivables (Net) | .1 | % | 16,161,285 |
|
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | 26,310,580,688 |
|
a Variable rate security—interest rate subject to periodic change. |
b Securities exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified |
institutional buyers.At July 31, 2012, these securities amounted to $4,953,242,317 or 18.8% of net assets. |
c The Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) placed Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association into conservatorship with FHFA as the |
conservator.As such, the FHFA oversees the continuing affairs of these companies. |
| | | |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | | | |
|
| Value (%) | | Value (%) |
Banking | 60.5 | Asset-Backed/Banking | 2.4 |
Repurchase Agreements | 18.0 | Asset-Backed/Multi-Seller Programs | 2.1 |
U.S. Government/Agencies | 13.9 | | |
Finance | 3.0 | | 99.9 |
|
† Based on net assets. | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
14
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | |
| Annualized | | |
| Yield on | | |
| Date of | Principal | |
Dreyfus Government Cash Management | Purchase (%) | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
|
U.S. Government Agencies—30.6% | | | |
Federal Farm Credit Bank | | | |
8/1/12 | 0.25 | 200,000,000a | 199,970,492 |
Federal Home Loan Bank: | | | |
8/1/12 | 0.20 | 100,000,000a | 100,000,000 |
8/1/12 | 0.27 | 669,000,000a | 668,577,065 |
8/1/12 | 0.32 | 400,000,000a | 399,978,743 |
8/15/12 | 0.21 | 233,690,000 | 234,085,819 |
8/22/12 | 0.20 | 248,235,000 | 248,456,631 |
9/26/12 | 0.16 | 10,000,000 | 10,001,176 |
10/25/12 | 0.22 | 144,000,000a | 144,000,000 |
11/23/12 | 0.16 | 54,500,000 | 54,505,275 |
11/23/12 | 0.17 | 22,000,000 | 22,002,129 |
11/28/12 | 0.16 | 183,000,000 | 183,007,025 |
11/29/12 | 0.16 | 224,285,000 | 224,308,457 |
2/6/13 | 0.20 | 200,000,000 | 199,938,432 |
2/8/13 | 0.19 | 119,500,000 | 119,485,618 |
2/8/13 | 0.21 | 30,500,000 | 30,493,649 |
3/1/13 | 0.17 | 111,350,000 | 111,355,269 |
5/3/13 | 0.20 | 10,000,000 | 9,993,772 |
5/8/13 | 0.23 | 250,000,000 | 250,000,000 |
5/16/13 | 0.20 | 20,000,000 | 20,016,128 |
5/21/13 | 0.20 | 41,940,000 | 41,950,878 |
5/21/13 | 0.20 | 65,000,000 | 65,011,864 |
5/21/13 | 0.25 | 250,000,000 | 249,958,316 |
5/24/13 | 0.20 | 27,700,000 | 27,698,403 |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | | |
10/19/12 | 0.18 | 300,000,000b | 299,881,500 |
4/15/13 | 0.18 | 200,000,000b | 202,002,209 |
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | | |
8/1/12 | 0.33 | 287,445,000a,b | 287,458,648 |
8/1/12 | 0.36 | 601,485,000a,b | 601,446,597 |
10/15/12 | 0.18 | 300,000,000b | 299,887,500 |
Total U.S. Government Agencies | | | |
(cost $5,305,471,595) | | | 5,305,471,595 |
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bills—.7% | | | |
8/9/12 | | | |
(cost $122,997,950) | 0.08 | 123,000,000 | 122,997,950 |
|
|
U.S. Treasury Notes—20.2% | | | |
8/31/12 | 0.13 | 162,000,000 | 162,031,333 |
9/17/12 | 0.15 | 750,000,000 | 751,152,418 |
10/15/12 | 0.11 | 495,000,000 | 496,279,610 |
11/15/12 | 0.14 | 90,000,000 | 90,319,033 |
11/30/12 | 0.15 | 190,000,000 | 190,216,046 |
12/17/12 | 0.14 | 500,000,000 | 501,811,871 |
1/15/13 | 0.18 | 200,000,000 | 201,088,042 |
The Funds 15
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
| | | Annualized | | |
| | | Yield on | | |
| | | Date of | Principal | |
| Dreyfus Government Cash Management (continued) | | Purchase (%) | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
|
| U.S. Treasury Notes (continued) | | | | |
| 2/15/13 | | 0.20 | 200,000,000 | 201,271,194 |
| 4/1/13 | | 0.21 | 300,000,000 | 304,563,552 |
| 4/15/13 | | 0.18 | 300,000,000 | 303,287,286 |
| 5/15/13 | | 0.20 | 95,000,000 | 95,867,296 |
| 6/17/13 | | 0.23 | 100,000,000 | 100,767,640 |
| 7/1/13 | | 0.17 | 100,000,000 | 102,897,174 |
| Total U.S. Treasury Notes | | | | |
| (cost $3,501,552,495) | | | | 3,501,552,495 |
|
|
| Repurchase Agreements—48.4% | | | | |
| ABN AMRO Bank N.V. | | | | |
| dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $1,100,004,889 | | | | |
| (fully collateralized by $252,172,300 U.S. Treasury Inflation | | | | |
| Protected Securities, 2.38%-3.63%, due 1/15/25-4/15/28, | | | | |
| value $469,593,594 and $620,870,800 U.S. Treasury Notes, | | | | |
| 1%-3.13%, due 7/15/13-1/31/17, value $652,406,435) | | 0.16 | 1,100,000,000 | 1,100,000,000 |
| Bank of Nova Scotia dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the | | | | |
| amount of $250,001,111 (fully collateralized by | | | | |
| $249,907,500 U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.25%-2.25%, | | | | |
| due 3/31/14-7/31/18, value $255,001,201) | | 0.16 | 250,000,000 | 250,000,000 |
| Barclays Capital, Inc. dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of | | | | |
| $228,001,077 (fully collateralized by $160,372,000 U.S. Treasury | | | | |
| Bonds, 4.63%, due 2/15/40, value $232,560,103) | | 0.17 | 228,000,000 | 228,000,000 |
| Credit Agricole CIB dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of | | | | |
| $1,300,005,778 (fully collateralized by $147,609,900 | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury Bonds, 8.75%-8.88%, due 2/15/19-5/15/20, | | | | |
| value $230,356,532 and $1,038,981,400 U.S. Treasury Notes, | | | | |
| 0.25%-4.13%, due 12/15/13-5/15/21, value $1,095,643,495) | | 0.16 | 1,300,000,000 | 1,300,000,000 |
| Credit Agricole CIB dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of | | | | |
| $800,003,778 (fully collateralized by $167,775,265 Federal | | | | |
| Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 4%-4.50%, due 6/1/41-8/1/41, | | | | |
| value $173,786,492 and $1,146,178,843 Federal National | | | | |
| Mortgage Association, 4%-5.50%, due 9/1/31-11/1/40, | | | | |
| value $642,213,509) | | 0.17 | 800,000,000 | 800,000,000 |
| Credit Suisse Securities LLC dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of | | | | |
| $700,002,917 (fully collateralized by $1,121,206,937 U.S. Treasury Strips, | | | | |
| due 2/15/15-2/15/39, value $714,002,302) | | 0.15 | 700,000,000 | 700,000,000 |
16
| | | |
| Annualized | | |
| Yield on | | |
| Date of | Principal | |
Dreyfus Government Cash Management (continued) | Purchase (%) | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
|
Repurchase Agreements (continued) | | | |
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the | | | |
amount of $450,002,250 (fully collateralized by $101,113,000 | | | |
Federal Farm Credit Bank, 0.37%-2.99%, due 6/11/14-7/10/26, | | | |
value $102,179,523, $118,150,000 Federal Home Loan Bank, | | | |
0.16%-3.75%, due 2/1/13-3/5/32, value $118,566,149, | | | |
$110,576,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., | | | |
0%-6.25%, due 9/12/12-7/15/32, value $124,023,636 and | | | |
$110,796,000 Federal National Mortgage Association, 0.50%-5%, | | | |
due 6/19/15-7/25/17, value $114,231,675) | 0.18 | 450,000,000 | 450,000,000 |
HSBC USA Inc. dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $600,002,667 | | | |
(fully collateralized by $607,285,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.13%-1.50%, | | | |
due 7/31/14-6/30/19, value $612,001,118) | 0.16 | 600,000,000 | 600,000,000 |
HSBC USA Inc. dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of | | | |
$100,000,472 (fully collateralized by $91,545,000 | | | |
U.S. Treasury Notes, 4.13%, due 5/15/15, value $102,005,037) | 0.17 | 100,000,000 | 100,000,000 |
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of | | | |
$725,003,222 (fully collateralized by $22,624,000 Federal | | | |
Agricultural Mortgage Corp., 0%-3.84%, due 8/6/12-4/12/22, | | | |
value $24,095,353, $116,223,000 Federal Farm Credit Bank, | | | |
0%-6.06%, due 8/1/12-12/23/41, value $121,600,821, | | | |
$185,982,000 Federal Home Loan Bank, 0%-6.46%, | | | |
due 8/8/12-3/14/36, value $181,457,626, $143,785,000 | | | |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., 0%-6.75%, | | | |
due 8/6/12-3/15/31, value $142,024,506, $234,252,000 | | | |
Federal National Mortgage Association, 0%-10.35%, | | | |
due 8/1/12-8/6/38, value $216,768,532, $2,585,000 | | | |
Financing Corp., 0%, due 8/3/12-9/26/19, value $2,451,217, | | | |
$26,079,000 Resolution Funding Corp., 0%-9.38%, | | | |
due 10/15/12-4/15/30, value $26,395,837 and | | | |
$18,304,000 Tennessee Valley Authority, 0%-7.13%, | | | |
due 3/15/13-4/1/56, value $24,706,830) | 0.16 | 725,000,000 | 725,000,000 |
Morgan Stanley dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $378,001,785 | | | |
(fully collateralized by $369,030,900 U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.25%-2.63%, | | | |
due 1/31/14-4/30/16, value $385,560,030) | 0.17 | 378,000,000 | 378,000,000 |
RBC Capital Markets dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the | | | |
amount of $300,001,083 (fully collateralized by $66,596,000 | | | |
U.S. Treasury Bills, due 12/27/12, value $66,557,175 and | | | |
$233,203,040 U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.38%-3.13%, | | | |
due 6/30/13-10/31/15, value $239,442,826) | 0.13 | 300,000,000 | 300,000,000 |
The Funds 17
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | |
| Annualized | | | |
| Yield on | | | |
| Date of | Principal | | |
Dreyfus Government Cash Management (continued) | Purchase (%) | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Repurchase Agreements (continued) | | | | |
RBC Capital Markets dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of | | | | |
$100,000,389 (fully collateralized by $101,902,000 Federal Home | | | | |
Loan Mortgage Corp., 0.38%, due 8/28/14, value $102,000,930) | 0.14 | 100,000,000 | | 100,000,000 |
Societe Generale dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $300,001,417 | | | | |
(fully collateralized by $140,000,000 Resolution Funding Corp., 0%, | | | | |
due 1/15/21, value $121,329,600 and $81,623,900 U.S. Treasury | | | | |
Inflation Protected Securities, 3.63%, due 4/15/28, value $184,670,487) | 0.17 | 300,000,000 | | 300,000,000 |
Societe Generale dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $200,001,000 | | | | |
(fully collateralized by $263,558,000 Resolution Funding Corp., 0%, | | | | |
due 4/15/18-4/15/30, value $204,000,188) | 0.18 | 200,000,000 | | 200,000,000 |
TD Securities (USA) LLC dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of | | | | |
$855,003,325 (fully collateralized by $839,901,700 U.S. Treasury Notes, | | | | |
0.63%-2%, due 1/31/2013-2/15/22, value $872,100,070) | 0.14 | 855,000,000 | | 855,000,000 |
Total Repurchase Agreements | | | | |
(cost $8,386,000,000) | | | | 8,386,000,000 |
|
Total Investments (cost $17,316,022,040) | | 99.9 | % | 17,316,022,040 |
|
Cash and Receivables (Net) | | .1 | % | 21,299,638 |
|
Net Assets | | 100.0 | % | 17,337,321,678 |
|
a Variable rate security—interest rate subject to periodic change. |
b The Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) placed Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association into conservatorship with FHFA as the |
conservator.As such, the FHFA oversees the continuing affairs of these companies. |
| | | |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | | | |
|
| Value (%) | | Value (%) |
Repurchase Agreements | 48.4 | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. | 2.9 |
U.S. Treasury Notes | 20.2 | Federal Farm Credit Bank | 1.1 |
Federal Home Loan Bank | 19.7 | U.S. Treasury Bills | .7 |
Federal National Mortgage Association | 6.9 | | 99.9 |
|
† Based on net assets. | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
18
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | |
| Annualized | | |
| Yield on | | |
| Date of | Principal | |
Dreyfus Government Prime Cash Management | Purchase (%) | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
|
U.S. Government Agencies—63.8% | | | |
Federal Farm Credit Bank: | | | |
8/1/12 | 0.25 | 75,000,000a | 74,988,934 |
8/10/12 | 0.12 | 50,000,000 | 49,998,500 |
8/16/12 | 0.10 | 100,000,000 | 99,995,833 |
8/17/12 | 0.32 | 82,500,000a | 82,502,918 |
11/1/12 | 0.16 | 25,000,000 | 25,001,247 |
3/13/13 | 0.18 | 20,000,000 | 20,000,949 |
4/15/13 | 0.20 | 95,000,000a | 95,033,633 |
Federal Home Loan Bank: | | | |
8/1/12 | 0.001 | 61,000,000 | 61,000,000 |
8/1/12 | 0.20 | 150,000,000a | 149,964,031 |
8/3/12 | 0.13 | 100,000,000 | 99,999,306 |
8/8/12 | 0.09 | 219,018,000 | 219,014,380 |
8/10/12 | 0.09�� | 54,600,000 | 54,598,771 |
8/15/12 | 0.11 | 261,105,000 | 261,093,962 |
8/20/12 | 0.08 | 77,800,000 | 77,796,715 |
8/22/12 | 0.10 | 330,026,000 | 330,007,507 |
8/29/12 | 0.11 | 175,000,000 | 174,985,708 |
9/7/12 | 0.11 | 95,900,000 | 95,889,651 |
9/14/12 | 0.14 | 16,000,000 | 16,034,999 |
9/19/12 | 0.13 | 100,000,000 | 99,982,986 |
9/21/12 | 0.12 | 200,000,000 | 199,966,000 |
9/26/12 | 0.14 | 30,400,000 | 30,467,983 |
10/3/12 | 0.14 | 97,000,000 | 96,976,235 |
10/17/12 | 0.14 | 75,000,000 | 74,978,076 |
10/24/12 | 0.13 | 50,000,000 | 49,984,600 |
11/7/12 | 0.16 | 25,000,000 | 24,989,111 |
11/9/12 | 0.16 | 25,000,000 | 24,988,889 |
12/5/12 | 0.17 | 190,000,000 | 189,886,950 |
12/12/12 | 0.17 | 84,975,000 | 84,921,631 |
Tennessee Valley Authority | | | |
3/15/13 | 0.15 | 11,058,000 | 11,455,518 |
Total U.S. Government Agencies | | | |
(cost $2,876,505,023) | | | 2,876,505,023 |
|
|
U.S. Treasury Bills—12.1% | | | |
9/6/12 | 0.07 | 50,000,000 | 49,996,500 |
9/13/12 | 0.09 | 76,000,000 | 75,991,830 |
9/27/12 | 0.13 | 150,000,000 | 149,969,125 |
10/11/12 | 0.09 | 150,000,000 | 149,973,375 |
10/18/12 | 0.09 | 100,000,000 | 99,980,500 |
11/29/12 | 0.13 | 19,000,000 | 18,991,767 |
Total U.S. Treasury Bills | | | |
(cost $544,903,097) | | | 544,903,097 |
The Funds 19
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | |
| Annualized | | |
| Yield on | | |
| Date of | Principal | |
Dreyfus Government Prime Cash Management (continued) | Purchase (%) | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
U.S. Treasury Notes—24.0% | | | |
8/15/12 | 0.11 | 175,000,000 | 175,110,533 |
8/31/12 | 0.11 | 200,000,000 | 200,042,989 |
9/17/12 | 0.14 | 150,000,000 | 150,233,321 |
10/1/12 | 0.12 | 120,000,000 | 120,818,953 |
10/15/12 | 0.12 | 115,000,000 | 115,295,092 |
11/15/12 | 0.13 | 17,000,000 | 17,189,184 |
11/15/12 | 0.15 | 200,000,000 | 200,705,198 |
12/17/12 | 0.15 | 100,000,000 | 100,360,180 |
Total U.S. Treasury Notes | | | |
(cost $1,079,755,450) | | | 1,079,755,450 |
Total Investments (cost $4,501,163,570) | | 99.9% | 4,501,163,570 |
Cash and Receivables (Net) | | .1% | 5,841,596 |
Net Assets | | 100.0% | 4,507,005,166 |
|
a Variable rate security—interest rate subject to periodic change. | | | |
| | | |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | | | |
|
| Value (%) | | Value (%) |
Federal Home Loan Bank | 53.6 | Federal Farm Credit Bank | 9.9 |
U.S. Treasury Notes | 24.0 | Tennessee Valley Authority | .3 |
U.S. Treasury Bills | 12.1 | | 99.9 |
|
† Based on net assets. | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
20
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | |
| Annualized | | |
| Yield on | | |
| Date of | Principal | |
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management | Purchase (%) | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
U.S. Treasury Bills—11.3% | | | |
8/23/12 | 0.12 | 150,000,000 | 149,989,000 |
9/6/12 | 0.13 | 450,000,000 | 449,941,500 |
9/13/12 | 0.07 | 80,000,000 | 79,993,311 |
9/20/12 | 0.15 | 500,000,000 | 499,895,833 |
11/23/12 | 0.15 | 525,000,000 | 524,758,938 |
11/29/12 | 0.14 | 350,000,000 | 349,842,500 |
Total U.S. Treasury Bills | | | |
(cost $2,054,421,082) | | | 2,054,421,082 |
|
U.S. Treasury Notes—36.5% | | | |
8/15/12 | 0.11 | 1,450,000,000 | 1,450,914,782 |
9/17/12 | 0.11 | 675,000,000 | 676,050,586 |
10/1/12 | 0.11 | 250,000,000 | 250,110,197 |
10/15/12 | 0.14 | 250,000,000 | 250,632,205 |
10/31/12 | 0.15 | 466,000,000 | 470,277,196 |
11/15/12 | 0.13 | 50,000,000 | 50,555,826 |
11/30/12 | 0.15 | 240,000,000 | 242,558,329 |
11/30/12 | 0.16 | 100,000,000 | 100,109,724 |
12/17/12 | 0.15 | 720,000,000 | 722,608,771 |
1/15/13 | 0.18 | 596,000,000 | 599,239,303 |
2/15/13 | 0.19 | 791,000,000 | 796,080,652 |
4/1/13 | 0.16 | 140,000,000 | 140,534,739 |
4/1/13 | 0.18 | 200,000,000 | 203,045,498 |
4/30/13 | 0.19 | 310,000,000 | 310,988,044 |
5/31/13 | 0.20 | 281,500,000 | 289,160,593 |
6/17/13 | 0.23 | 100,000,000 | 100,767,641 |
Total U.S. Treasury Notes | | | |
(cost $6,653,634,086) | | | 6,653,634,086 |
|
Repurchase Agreements—52.0% | | | |
ABN AMRO Bank N.V. | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $300,001,500 (fully collateralized | | | |
by $288,239,536 Government National Mortgage Association, 3.50%-4.50%, | | | |
due 3/20/41-3/20/42, value $306,000,001) | 0.18 | 300,000,000 | 300,000,000 |
ABN AMRO Bank N.V. | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $1,400,006,222 | | | |
(fully collateralized by $1,426,821,500 U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.25%, | | | |
due 1/31/14-3/31/14, value $1,428,000,040) | 0.16 | 1,400,000,000 | 1,400,000,000 |
Bank of Nova Scotia | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $650,002,889 | | | |
(fully collateralized by $94,827,300 U.S. Treasury Bonds, 8%, | | | |
due 11/15/21, value $151,710,796 and $505,280,600 U.S. Treasury | | | |
Notes, 0.25%-1.75%, due 1/31/14-9/15/14, value $511,292,249) | 0.16 | 650,000,000 | 650,000,000 |
The Funds 21
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | |
| Annualized | | |
| Yield on | | |
| Date of | Principal | |
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management (continued) | Purchase (%) | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
|
Repurchase Agreements (continued) | | | |
Barclays Capital, Inc. | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $160,000,756 (fully collateralized | | | |
by $4,016,600 U.S. Treasury Bonds, 4.63%, due 2/15/40, value $5,824,589 | | | |
and $140,101,900 U.S. Treasury Notes, 2.63%, due 8/15/20, value $157,375,521) | 0.17 | 160,000,000 | 160,000,000 |
Credit Agricole CIB | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $900,004,000 (fully | | | |
collateralized by $9,586,100 U.S. Treasury Bonds, 7.63%, due 11/15/22, | | | |
value $15,370,875 and $853,630,600 U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.13%-2.63%, | | | |
due 7/31/14-2/29/16, value $902,629,147) | 0.16 | 900,000,000 | 900,000,000 |
Credit Suisse Securities LLC | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $730,003,042 (fully collateralized | | | |
by $994,009,250 U.S. Treasury Strips, due 2/15/13-8/15/37, value $744,600,417) | 0.15 | 730,000,000 | 730,000,000 |
Credit Suisse Securities LLC | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $1,300,005,778 (fully collateralized | | | |
by $1,856,896,468 Government National Mortgage Association, 1.63%-10.50%, | | | |
due 9/15/12-7/15/54, value $1,143,356,068 and $182,780,200 U.S. Treasury | | | |
Notes, 0.25%, due 5/15/15, value $182,647,330) | 0.16 | 1,300,000,000 | 1,300,000,000 |
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $300,001,417 (fully | | | |
collateralized by $134,038,589 Government National Mortgage Association, | | | |
3%-6%, due 10/15/35-9/15/52, value $102,000,001 and $204,415,200 | | | |
U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.13%, due 7/31/14, value $204,000,033) | 0.17 | 300,000,000 | 300,000,000 |
Goldman, Sachs & Co. | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $158,000,439 (fully | | | |
collateralized by $129,708,300 U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, | | | |
1.25%, due 7/15/20, value $161,160,016) | 0.10 | 158,000,000 | 158,000,000 |
HSBC USA Inc. dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of | | | |
$520,002,311 (fully collateralized by $127,387,000 U.S. Treasury Bonds, | | | |
6.38%, due 8/15/27, value $203,245,684 and $318,382,400 U.S. Treasury | | | |
Notes, 0.75%-3.38%, due 6/30/13-8/15/13, value $327,159,243) | 0.16 | 520,000,000 | 520,000,000 |
Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc. | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $530,002,356 (fully collateralized | | | |
by $701,450,575 Government National Mortgage Association, 1.63%-6%, | | | |
due 9/20/25-3/15/52, value $122,400,001 and $397,201,700 U.S. Treasury Notes, | | | |
1.75%-2.63%, due 12/31/14-5/31/16, value $418,200,050) | 0.16 | 530,000,000 | 530,000,000 |
22
| | | | |
| Annualized | | | |
| Yield on | | | |
| Date of | Principal | | |
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management (continued) | Purchase (%) | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Repurchase Agreements (continued) | | | | |
Morgan Stanley | | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $550,002,597 (fully | | | | |
collateralized by $100,958,500 U.S. Treasury Bonds, 6.38%, due 8/15/27, | | | | |
value $161,079,079 and $386,257,625 U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.75%-4.25%, | | | | |
due 9/15/13-11/15/17, value $399,920,922) | 0.17 | 550,000,000 | | 550,000,000 |
RBC Capital Markets | | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $100,000,361 | | | | |
(fully collateralized by $97,359,100 U.S. Treasury Notes, | | | | |
1.75%-4.25%, due 8/15/14-7/31/15, value $102,000,044) | 0.13 | 100,000,000 | | 100,000,000 |
SG Americas Securities, LLC | | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $1,300,006,139 (fully collateralized | | | | |
by $228,475,500 U.S. Treasury Bills, due 8/9/12-7/25/13, value $228,419,005, | | | | |
$86,844,300 U.S. Treasury Bonds, 3.13%-11.25%, due 2/15/15-11/15/41, | | | | |
value $131,510,630, $12,500,000 U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, | | | | |
0.13%-2.38%, due 7/15/14-2/15/42, value $15,798,453, $887,257,300 | | | | |
U.S. Treasury Notes, 0.13%-5.13%, due 8/15/12-2/15/21, value $927,388,147 | | | | |
and $35,582,000 U.S. Treasury Strips, due 5/15/22-11/15/41, value $22,883,781) | 0.17 | 1,300,000,000 | | 1,300,000,000 |
Societe Generale | | | | |
dated 7/31/12, due 8/1/12 in the amount of $575,002,875 (fully collateralized | | | | |
by $1,234,214,225 Government National Mortgage Association, 1.63%-6%, | | | | |
due 1/20/28-1/20/42, value $426,421,022 and $147,697,500 U.S. Treasury | | | | |
Notes, 2.25%, due 7/31/18, value $160,078,981) | 0.18 | 575,000,000 | | 575,000,000 |
Total Repurchase Agreements | | | | |
(cost $9,473,000,000) | | | | 9,473,000,000 |
|
Total Investments (cost $18,181,055,168) | | 99.8 | % | 18,181,055,168 |
|
Cash and Receivables (Net) | | .2 | % | 32,168,032 |
|
Net Assets | | 100.0 | % | 18,213,223,200 |
| | | |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | | | |
| Value (%) | | Value (%) |
Repurchase Agreements | 52.0 | U.S. Treasury Bills | 11.3 |
U.S. Treasury Notes | 36.5 | | 99.8 |
† Based on net assets. | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
The Funds 23
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | |
| Annualized | | |
| Yield on | | |
| Date of | Principal | |
Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management | Purchase (%) | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
|
U.S. Treasury Bills—92.0% | | | |
8/2/12 | 0.08 | 1,251,000,000 | 1,250,997,388 |
8/9/12 | 0.08 | 1,500,000,000 | 1,499,972,222 |
8/16/12 | 0.07 | 4,340,000,000 | 4,339,869,552 |
8/23/12 | 0.08 | 2,123,000,000 | 2,122,900,060 |
8/30/12 | 0.08 | 2,912,000,000 | 2,911,813,794 |
9/6/12 | 0.08 | 1,665,000,000 | 1,664,866,765 |
9/13/12 | 0.10 | 2,979,000,000 | 2,978,657,033 |
9/20/12 | 0.09 | 1,281,000,000 | 1,280,844,687 |
9/27/12 | 0.10 | 2,000,000,000 | 1,999,682,542 |
10/4/12 | 0.09 | 1,700,000,000 | 1,699,740,446 |
10/11/12 | 0.10 | 1,050,000,000 | 1,049,803,024 |
10/18/12 | 0.10 | 1,302,000,000 | 1,301,713,588 |
10/25/12 | 0.10 | 970,000,000 | 969,775,931 |
11/1/12 | 0.14 | 907,000,000 | 906,673,656 |
11/8/12 | 0.13 | 50,000,000 | 49,982,125 |
11/23/12 | 0.15 | 300,000,000 | 299,862,251 |
11/29/12 | 0.14 | 300,000,000 | 299,860,000 |
12/27/12 | 0.16 | 250,000,000 | 249,840,694 |
Total U.S. Treasury Bills | | | |
(cost $26,876,855,758) | | | 26,876,855,758 |
|
U.S. Treasury Notes—14.4% | | | |
8/15/12 | 0.09 | 1,157,045,000 | 1,157,781,764 |
8/15/12 | 0.10 | 222,000,000 | 222,364,393 |
8/31/12 | 0.11 | 409,000,000 | 409,087,802 |
8/31/12 | 0.09 | 324,000,000 | 325,063,650 |
9/17/12 | 0.10 | 775,000,000 | 776,213,135 |
10/1/12 | 0.14 | 255,000,000 | 255,098,659 |
10/1/12 | 0.12 | 676,000,000 | 680,596,315 |
10/15/12 | 0.11 | 118,000,000 | 118,305,258 |
11/15/12 | 0.13 | 250,000,000 | 250,894,375 |
Total U.S. Treasury Notes | | | |
(cost $4,195,405,351) | | | 4,195,405,351 |
|
Total Investments (cost $31,072,261,109) | | 106.4% | 31,072,261,109 |
Liabilities, Less Cash and Receivables | | (6.4%) | (1,867,320,626) |
Net Assets | | 100.0% | 29,204,940,483 |
| | | |
Portfolio Summary (Unaudited)† | | | |
| Value (%) | | Value (%) |
U.S. Treasury Bills | 92.0 | U.S. Treasury Notes | 14.4 |
| | | 106.4 |
† Based on net assets. | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | |
24
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | |
| Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments—99.8% | | | | | |
Alabama—.8% | | | | | |
Columbia Industrial Development Board, PCR, | | | | | |
Refunding (Alabama Power Company Project) | 0.18 | 8/1/12 | 6,000,000 | a | 6,000,000 |
Arizona—.1% | | | | | |
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, MFHR | | | | | |
(San Clemente Apartments Project) (Liquidity | | | | | |
Facility; FNMA and LOC; FNMA) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 1,010,000 | a | 1,010,000 |
California—5.4% | | | | | |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, | | | | | |
SWDR (Rainbow Disposal Company Inc. Project) | | | | | |
(LOC; Union Bank NA) | 0.23 | 8/7/12 | 17,815,000 | a | 17,815,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue, CP (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.25 | 10/18/12 | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue, CP (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.25 | 12/13/12 | 14,000,000 | | 14,000,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue, CP (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.23 | 1/14/13 | 4,000,000 | | 4,000,000 |
Colorado—5.5% | | | | | |
Colorado Housing and Finance Authority, EDR | | | | | |
(Popiel Properties, LLC Project) (LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.30 | 8/7/12 | 2,455,000 | a | 2,455,000 |
Colorado Housing and Finance Authority, EDR | | | | | |
(Wanco, Inc. Project) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.30 | 8/7/12 | 2,035,000 | a | 2,035,000 |
Colorado Housing and Finance Authority, SFMR | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Royal Bank of Canada) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 13,500,000 | a | 13,500,000 |
Denver City and County, Airport Revenue, CP | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Barclays Bank PLC) | 0.21 | 8/9/12 | 8,000,000 | | 8,000,000 |
RBC Municipal Products Inc. Trust (Series E-25) (Denver City and | | | | | |
County, Aviation Airport System Revenue) (Liquidity Facility; | | | | | |
Royal Bank of Canada and LOC; Royal Bank of Canada) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 15,000,000 a,b,c | | 15,000,000 |
District of Columbia—.7% | | | | | |
District of Columbia, University Revenue | | | | | |
(American University Issue) (LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 5,000,000 | a | 5,000,000 |
Florida—4.9% | | | | | |
Branch Banking and Trust Co. Municipal Trust (Series 2057) | | | | | |
(Miami-Dade County, Aviation Revenue (Miami International | | | | | |
Airport)) (Liquidity Facility; Branch Banking and Trust Co. | | | | | |
and LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 10,085,000 a,b,c | | 10,085,000 |
Broward County Housing Finance Authority, MFHR | | | | | |
(Cypress Grove Apartments Project) (LOC; FNMA) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 13,230,000 | a | 13,230,000 |
Greater Orlando Aviation Authority, Airport Facility Revenue | | | | | |
(FlightSafety International Inc. Project) (Insured; | | | | | |
Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corporation) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 6,105,000 | a | 6,105,000 |
Palm Beach County, Revenue, Refunding (Pine Crest | | | | | |
Preparatory School, Inc. Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.24 | 8/7/12 | 7,375,000 | a | 7,375,000 |
Georgia—.9% | | | | | |
Georgia, GO Notes | 5.00 | 9/1/12 | 1,500,000 | | 1,506,544 |
Georgia Municipal Gas Authority, Gas Revenue, | | | | | |
Refunding (Gas Portfolio III Project) | 2.00 | 11/13/12 | 5,400,000 | | 5,425,204 |
The Funds 25
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Cash Management Plus (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
Illinois—4.6% | | | | | |
Deutsche Bank Spears/Lifers Trust (Series DB-483) | | | | | |
(Northern Illinois Municipal Power Agency, Power Project | | | | | |
Revenue (Prairie State Project) (Liquidity Facility; | | | | | |
Deutsche Bank AG and LOC; Deutsche Bank AG) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 17,000,000 a,b,c | | 17,000,000 |
Illinois Development Finance Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Corporation) | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.15 | 8/1/12 | 7,500,000 | a | 7,500,000 |
Illinois Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue, CP | | | | | |
(LOC; Northern Trust Company) | 0.18 | 9/13/12 | 10,000,000 | | 10,000,000 |
Indiana—1.4% | | | | | |
Elkhart County, EDR (Four Seasons Manufacturing | | | | | |
Project) (LOC; PNC Bank NA) | 0.28 | 8/7/12 | 2,750,000 | a | 2,750,000 |
Fort Wayne, EDR (Park Center Project) (LOC; PNC Bank NA) | 0.23 | 8/7/12 | 1,890,000 | a | 1,890,000 |
Indiana Bond Bank, Advance Funding Program Notes | 1.25 | 1/3/13 | 2,950,000 | | 2,961,185 |
Indiana Finance Authority, EDR (JRL Leasing, Inc. and | | | | | |
LaSarre Co., LLC Project) (LOC; PNC Bank NA) | 0.28 | 8/7/12 | 2,900,000 | a | 2,900,000 |
Kansas—1.1% | | | | | |
Kansas Development Finance Authority, MFHR | | | | | |
(Tree House Apartments) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 8,105,000 | a | 8,105,000 |
Kentucky—1.1% | | | | | |
Jefferson County, Retirement Home Revenue | | | | | |
(Nazareth Literary and Benevolent Institution | | | | | |
Project) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.26 | 8/7/12 | 7,965,000 | a | 7,965,000 |
Louisiana—5.1% | | | | | |
Ascension Parish, CP (BASF SE) | 0.39 | 8/17/12 | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
Louisiana Local Government Environmental | | | | | |
Facilities and Community Development Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (Nicholls State University Student | | | | | |
Housing/Nicholls State University Facilities | | | | | |
Corporation Project) (Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | | |
Municipal Corp. and LOC; FHLB) | 0.40 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 | a | 10,000,000 |
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Air Products and Chemicals Project) | 0.15 | 8/1/12 | 23,300,000 | a | 23,300,000 |
Maryland—1.8% | | | | | |
Anne Arundel County, EDR (Atlas Container | | | | | |
Corporation Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.28 | 8/7/12 | 5,675,000 | a | 5,675,000 |
Baltimore County Revenue Authority, | | | | | |
Golf System Revenue (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 5,440,000 | a | 5,440,000 |
Frederick County, Revenue | | | | | |
(Homewood, Inc. Facility) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 2,500,000 | a | 2,500,000 |
Massachusetts—2.0% | | | | | |
Beverly, GO Notes, BAN | 1.00 | 12/18/12 | 6,000,000 | | 6,018,348 |
Worcester, GO Notes, BAN | 1.00 | 11/8/12 | 9,000,000 | | 9,015,258 |
Michigan—1.8% | | | | | |
Michigan Housing Development Authority, SFMR | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 | a | 10,000,000 |
26
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Cash Management Plus (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
Michigan (continued) | | | | | |
Pittsfield Township Economic Development Corporation, LOR, | | | | | |
Refunding (Arbor Project) (LOC; Comerica Bank) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 3,795,000 | a | 3,795,000 |
Minnesota—2.8% | | | | | |
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, Residential Housing | | | | | |
Finance Revenue (Liquidity Facility; FHLB) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 7,000,000 | a | 7,000,000 |
Minnesota Rural Water Finance Authority, | | | | | |
Public Projects Construction Notes | 1.25 | 3/1/13 | 3,500,000 | | 3,517,219 |
University of Minnesota, CP | 0.19 | 12/10/12 | 10,150,000 | | 10,150,000 |
Nevada—5.6% | | | | | |
Clark County, Airport System Junior Subordinate Lien Revenue | 2.00 | 7/1/13 | 17,000,000 | | 17,244,903 |
Clark County, IDR (Southwest Gas Corporation Project) | | | | | |
(LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.22 | 8/7/12 | 8,000,000 | a | 8,000,000 |
Las Vegas Valley Water District, CP | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.20 | 10/11/12 | 17,000,000 | | 17,000,000 |
New Hampshire—.6% | | | | | |
New Hampshire Health and Education Facilities Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (Kimball Union Academy) (LOC; RBS Citizens NA) | 0.29 | 8/7/12 | 4,790,000 | a | 4,790,000 |
New Jersey—1.3% | | | | | |
Paterson, GO Notes, BAN (General Improvement and Tax Appeal) | 1.50 | 6/6/13 | 3,500,000 | | 3,507,289 |
Woodbridge Township Board of Education, Temporary Notes | 1.00 | 2/6/13 | 6,100,000 | | 6,115,667 |
New York—6.4% | | | | | |
Amsterdam Enlarged City School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.25 | 6/28/13 | 7,100,000 | | 7,138,374 |
Dutchess County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | | |
Revenue (Arbor Ridge at Brookmeade Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 10,020,000 | a | 10,020,000 |
Eastchester Union Free School District, GO Notes, TAN | 1.00 | 2/28/13 | 5,000,000 | | 5,022,349 |
JPMorgan Chase Putters/Drivers Trust (Series 4089) (New York | | | | | |
State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway Bridge Trust | | | | | |
Fund Revenue) (Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.18 | 8/1/12 | 13,800,000 a,b,c | | 13,800,000 |
New York City, GO Notes (LOC; Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd.) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 4,000,000 | a | 4,000,000 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency, Housing Revenue | | | | | |
(25 Washington Street) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 7,800,000 | a | 7,800,000 |
North Carolina—2.0% | | | | | |
Deutsche Bank Spears/Lifers Trust (Series DBE-1066) | | | | | |
(North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care | | | | | |
Facilities Revenue (Novant Health Obligated Group)) (Liquidity | | | | | |
Facility; Deutsche Bank AG and LOC; Deutsche Bank AG) | 0.22 | 8/7/12 | 8,360,000 a,b,c | | 8,360,000 |
North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, | | | | | |
Educational Facilities Revenue (High Point University | | | | | |
Project) (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 3,400,000 | a | 3,400,000 |
North Carolina Capital Facilities Finance Agency, | | | | | |
Educational Facilities Revenue (The Raleigh School | | | | | |
Project) (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 3,500,000 | a | 3,500,000 |
Ohio—2.2% | | | | | |
Lorain County, IDR (Cutting Dynamics, Inc. | | | | | |
Project) (LOC; PNC Bank NA) | 0.28 | 8/7/12 | 1,730,000 | a | 1,730,000 |
The Funds 27
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Cash Management Plus (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
Ohio (continued) | | | | | |
Ohio Housing Finance Agency, Residential Mortgage | | | | | |
Revenue (Mortgage-Backed Securities Program) | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Citibank NA and LOC; GNMA) | 0.24 | 8/7/12 | 12,130,000 | a | 12,130,000 |
Union Township, GO Notes, BAN (Various Purpose) | 1.13 | 9/12/12 | 3,000,000 | | 3,001,622 |
Oklahoma—.4% | | | | | |
Oklahoma Water Resource Board, Revenue | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; State Street Bank and Trust Co.) | 0.35 | 9/1/12 | 2,900,000 | | 2,900,000 |
Pennsylvania—12.6% | | | | | |
Blair County Industrial Development Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (Hollidaysburg Area YMCA Project) | | | | | |
(LOC; Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania) | 0.28 | 8/7/12 | 2,820,000 | a | 2,820,000 |
Chester County Health and Education Facilities Authority, Mortgage | | | | | |
Revenue (Tel Hai Obligated Group Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 9,740,000 | a | 9,740,000 |
Emmaus General Authority, Local Government Revenue | | | | | |
(Bond Pool Program) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 8,700,000 | a | 8,700,000 |
Horizon Hospital System Authority, Senior Health and Housing | | | | | |
Facilities Revenue (Saint Paul Homes Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 7,195,000 | a | 7,195,000 |
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (Evergreen Community Power Facility) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.30 | 8/7/12 | 16,000,000 | a | 16,000,000 |
Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development, | | | | | |
Revenue (The Philadelphia Protestant | | | | | |
Home Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.40 | 8/7/12 | 9,000,000 | a | 9,000,000 |
Pittsburgh and Allegheny County Sports and Exhibition Authority, | | | | | |
Commonwealth LR (Insured; Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. | | | | | |
and Liquidity Facility; PNC Bank NA) | 0.47 | 8/7/12 | 20,000,000 | a | 20,000,000 |
Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority, Water and | | | | | |
Sewer System First Lien Revenue (Insured; Assured | | | | | |
Guaranty Municipal Corp. and Liquidity Facility; PNC Bank NA) | 0.38 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 | a | 10,000,000 |
RBC Municipal Products Inc. Trust (Series E-29) (Allegheny | | | | | |
County Hospital Development Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center)) (Liquidity Facility; | | | | | |
Royal Bank of Canada and LOC; Royal Bank of Canada) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 7,000,000 a,b,c | | 7,000,000 |
Union County Industrial Development Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (Stabler Companies Inc. Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.30 | 8/7/12 | 4,250,000 | a | 4,250,000 |
Tennessee—6.1% | | | | | |
Clarksville Public Building Authority, Pooled Financing | | | | | |
Revenue (Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.26 | 8/1/12 | 13,700,000 | a | 13,700,000 |
Clarksville Public Building Authority, Pooled Financing Revenue | | | | | |
(Tennessee Municipal Bond Fund) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.41 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 | a | 10,000,000 |
Cleveland Health and Educational Facilities Board, Revenue | | | | | |
(Lee University Project) (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 3,000,000 | a | 3,000,000 |
Sevier County Public Building Authority, Local Government | | | | | |
Public Improvement Revenue (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.27 | 8/7/12 | 6,775,000 | a | 6,775,000 |
28
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Cash Management Plus (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
Tennessee (continued) | | | | | |
Sevier County Public Building Authority, Public Projects | | | | | |
Construction Notes (Tennessee Association of | | | | | |
Utility Districts Interim Loan Program) | 1.25 | 4/1/13 | 4,100,000 | | 4,121,748 |
Shelby County Health Educational and Housing | | | | | |
Facility Board, Educational Facilities Revenue | | | | | |
(Rhodes College) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.26 | 8/7/12 | 8,520,000 | a | 8,520,000 |
Texas—12.8% | | | | | |
Calhoun Port Authority, Environmental Facilities | | | | | |
Revenue (Formosa Plastics Corporation, | | | | | |
Texas Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 | a | 10,000,000 |
DeSoto Industrial Development Authority, IDR, Refunding | | | | | |
(National Service Industries Inc. Project) (LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.28 | 8/7/12 | 3,660,000 | a | 3,660,000 |
Deutsche Bank Spears/Lifers Trust (Series DBE-626) | | | | | |
(North Texas Tollway Authority, First Tier System | | | | | |
Revenue, Refunding) (Liquidity Facility; Deutsche | | | | | |
Bank AG and LOC; Deutsche Bank AG) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 14,220,000 a,b,c | | 14,220,000 |
El Paso Independent School District, Unlimited Tax School | | | | | |
Building Bonds (Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank | | | | | |
and LOC; Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program) | 0.23 | 8/14/12 | 12,000,000 | | 12,000,000 |
Jefferson County Industrial Development Corporation, | | | | | |
Hurricane Ike Disaster Area Revenue (Jefferson Refinery, L.L.C. | | | | | |
Project) (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.45 | 9/27/12 | 1,700,000 | | 1,700,000 |
Jefferson County Industrial Development Corporation, | | | | | |
Hurricane Ike Disaster Area Revenue (Jefferson | | | | | |
Refinery, L.L.C. Project) (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.45 | 9/27/12 | 17,300,000 | | 17,300,000 |
Port of Port Arthur Navigation District, Revenue, CP (BASF SE) | 0.39 | 8/17/12 | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
RBC Municipal Products Inc. Trust (Series E-27) (Harris County Health | | | | | |
Facilities Development Corporation, HR, Refunding (Memorial | | | | | |
Hermann Healthcare System)) (Liquidity Facility; Royal | | | | | |
Bank of Canada and LOC; Royal Bank of Canada) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 5,000,000 a,b,c | | 5,000,000 |
Texas, CP (Liquidity Facility; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.19 | 9/13/12 | 5,550,000 | | 5,550,000 |
Texas, GO Notes (Veterans’ Housing Assistance Program) | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; State Street Bank and Trust Co.) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 16,000,000 | a | 16,000,000 |
Wells Fargo Stage Trust (Series 51-C) (Klein Independent | | | | | |
School District, Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds) | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Wells Fargo Bank and LOC; | | | | | |
Permanent School Fund Guarantee Program) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 5,000,000 a,b,c | | 5,000,000 |
Utah—4.6% | | | | | |
Utah State Board of Regents, Student Loan | | | | | |
Revenue (LOC; Royal Bank of Canada) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 9,300,000 | a | 9,300,000 |
Wells Fargo Stage Trust (Series 33C) (Riverton, HR, Refunding | | | | | |
(Intermountain Health Care Health Services, Inc.)) (Liquidity | | | | | |
Facility; Wells Fargo Bank and LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 25,000,000 a,b,c | | 25,000,000 |
The Funds 29
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Municipal | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Cash Management Plus (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | |
Virginia—1.8% | | | | |
Lynchburg Redevelopment and Housing Authority, Housing Revenue | | | | |
(KHM Properties-Lynchburg, LLC Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.25 | 8/7/12 | 13,520,000a | 13,520,000 |
Washington—.6% | | | | |
Pierce County Economic Development Corporation, Industrial | | | | |
Revenue (SeaTac Packaging Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.22 | 8/7/12 | 4,280,000a | 4,280,000 |
Wisconsin—2.8% | | | | |
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue | | | | |
(Aurora Health Care, Inc.) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.27 | 2/5/13 | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 |
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | | | | |
Revenue (Mequon Jewish Campus, Inc. Project) | | | | |
(LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 6,045,000a | 6,045,000 |
Total Investments (cost $748,880,710) | | | 99.8% | 748,880,710 |
Cash and Receivables (Net) | | | .2% | 1,603,948 |
Net Assets | | | 100.0% | 750,484,658 |
|
a Variable rate demand note—rate shown is the interest rate in effect at July 31, 2012. Maturity date represents the next demand date, or the ultimate maturity date if earlier. |
b Securities exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified |
institutional buyers.At July 31, 2012, these securities amounted to $120,465,000 or 16.1% of net assets. |
c The fund does not directly own the municipal security indicated; the fund owns an interest in a special purpose entity that, in turn, owns the underlying municipal security.The special |
purpose entity permits the fund to own interests in underlying assets, but in a manner structured to provide certain advantages not inherent in the underlying bonds (e.g., enhanced |
liquidity, yields linked to short-term rates). |
| | | | | | | |
| Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited) | | | |
|
| Fitch | | or | Moody’s | or | Standard & Poor’s | Value (%)† |
| F1+,F1 | | | VMIG1,MIG1,P1 | | SP1+,SP1,A1+,A1 | 87.0 |
| F-2 | | | VMIG2, MIG3, P2 | | SP2, A2 | 7.0 |
| AAA,AA,Ad | | | Aaa,Aa,Ad | | AAA,AA,Ad | .7 |
| Not Ratede | | | Not Ratede | | Not Ratede | 5.3 |
| | | | | | | 100.0 |
|
† Based on total investments. |
d Notes which are not F, MIG and SP rated are represented by bond ratings of the issuers. |
e Securities which, while not rated by Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, have been determined by the Manager to be of comparable quality to those rated securities in which the |
fund may invest. |
See Summary of Abbreviations on page 51.
See notes to financial statements.
30
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus New York | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Municipal Cash Management | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments—99.8% | | | | |
New York—97.2% | | | | |
Albany Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | |
(Albany Medical Center Hospital Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.28 | 8/7/12 | 2,400,000a | 2,400,000 |
Ausable Valley Central School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.50 | 4/5/13 | 3,000,000 | 3,015,307 |
Ausable Valley Central School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.50 | 4/5/13 | 5,400,000 | 5,427,957 |
Campbell-Savona Central School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.50 | 6/21/13 | 2,800,000 | 2,820,481 |
Chautauqua County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue (Gerry Homes Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.40 | 8/7/12 | 10,110,000a | 10,110,000 |
Chemung County Industrial Development Agency, IDR | | | | |
(Trayer Products, Inc. Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.40 | 8/7/12 | 450,000a | 450,000 |
Clyde-Savannah Central School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.25 | 9/7/12 | 7,000,000 | 7,004,486 |
Columbia County Capital Resource Corporation, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | |
(The Columbia Memorial Hospital Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 6,145,000a | 6,145,000 |
Columbia County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | |
(The Columbia Memorial Hospital Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 4,850,000a | 4,850,000 |
East Moriches Union Free School District, GO Notes, TAN | 1.50 | 6/20/13 | 3,900,000 | 3,929,124 |
Eastchester Union Free School District, GO Notes, TAN | 1.00 | 2/28/13 | 5,000,000 | 5,022,349 |
Erie County Industrial Development Agency, IDR | | | | |
(Hydro-Air Components Inc. Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.22 | 8/7/12 | 2,300,000a | 2,300,000 |
Hamburg Central School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.50 | 6/14/13 | 10,000,000 | 10,074,169 |
Hamburg Central School District, GO Notes, RAN | 1.00 | 11/21/12 | 3,200,000 | 3,203,397 |
Herkimer County Industrial Development Agency, IDR | | | | |
(F.E. Hale Manufacturing Company Facility) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.40 | 8/7/12 | 1,610,000a | 1,610,000 |
JPMorgan Chase Putters/Drivers Trust (Series 4089) (New York | | | | |
State Thruway Authority, Second General Highway Bridge Trust | | | | |
Fund Revenue) (Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.18 | 8/1/12 | 2,620,000 a,b,c | 2,620,000 |
Lancaster Industrial Development Agency, IDR (Sealing | | | | |
Devices Inc. Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.22 | 8/7/12 | 2,080,000a | 2,080,000 |
Marathon Central School District, GO Notes, BAN | 0.75 | 9/21/12 | 5,969,188 | 5,972,022 |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Transportation | | | | |
Revenue, CP (Liquidity Facility; Barclays Bank PLC) | 0.20 | 8/10/12 | 10,000,000 | 10,000,000 |
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, | | | | |
Transportation Revenue, CP (LOC; Citibank NA) | 0.19 | 8/14/12 | 24,000,000 | 24,000,000 |
Monroe County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue (YMCA of Greater Rochester Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 2,070,000a,d | 2,070,000 |
Monroe County Industrial Development Agency, IDR | | | | |
(Chaney Enterprises, LLC Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.35 | 8/7/12 | 1,800,000a | 1,800,000 |
Monroe County Industrial Development Corporation, Revenue | | | | |
(Saint Ann’s Home for the Aged Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 8,000,000a | 8,000,000 |
Nassau County Interim Finance Authority, Sales Tax | | | | |
Secured Revenue (Liquidity Facility; Bank of America) | 0.26 | 8/7/12 | 23,100,000a | 23,100,000 |
New York City, GO Notes | 5.00 | 8/1/12 | 895,000 | 895,000 |
New York City, GO Notes | 5.00 | 8/1/12 | 4,680,000 | 4,680,000 |
New York City, GO Notes | 6.00 | 8/1/12 | 980,000 | 980,000 |
New York City, GO Notes | 5.00 | 1/1/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,019,848 |
New York City, GO Notes (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.22 | 8/7/12 | 3,000,000a | 3,000,000 |
New York City, GO Notes (LOC; Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd.) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 20,000,000a | 20,000,000 |
The Funds 31
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus New York | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Municipal Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
New York (continued) | | | | | |
New York City, GO Notes (Prerefunded) | 5.00 | 8/1/12 | 1,105,000 | e | 1,105,000 |
New York City Capital Resource Corporation, Recovery Zone | | | | | |
Facility Revenue (WytheHotel Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 3,800,000 | a | 3,800,000 |
New York City Housing Development Corporation, MFHR | 0.27 | 2/1/13 | 8,400,000 | d | 8,400,000 |
New York City Housing Development Corporation, MFHR (Citigroup | | | | | |
ROCS, Series RR II R-13100) (Liquidity Facility; Citibank NA) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 5,450,000 a,b,c,d | | 5,450,000 |
New York City Housing Development Corporation, MFMR | | | | | |
(1405 Fifth Avenue Apartments) (LOC; Citibank NA) | 0.22 | 8/7/12 | 9,500,000 | a,d | 9,500,000 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | | |
(French Institute-Alliance Francaise de New York—Federation of | | | | | |
French Alliances in the United States Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 3,325,000 | a | 3,325,000 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | | |
Revenue (Jewish Community Center on the Upper | | | | | |
West Side, Inc. Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 4,700,000 | a,d | 4,700,000 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | | |
(Sephardic Community Youth Center, Inc. Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 3,100,000 | a | 3,100,000 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | | |
Revenue (Spence-Chapin, Services to Families and | | | | | |
Children Project) (LOC; TD Bank) | 0.23 | 8/7/12 | 5,875,000 | a | 5,875,000 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | | |
(The Allen-Stevenson School Project) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 6,925,000 | a | 6,925,000 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | | |
Revenue (Village Community School Project) (LOC; TD Bank) | 0.27 | 8/7/12 | 2,355,000 | a | 2,355,000 |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, CP | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.20 | 9/7/12 | 20,000,000 | | 20,000,000 |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water and Sewer | | | | | |
System Revenue (Liquidity Facility; Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd.) | 0.14 | 8/1/12 | 4,900,000 | a | 4,900,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority, Insured Revenue | | | | | |
(The Culinary Institute of America) (LOC; TD Bank) | 0.13 | 8/7/12 | 6,925,000 | a | 6,925,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Long Island University) (LOC; TD Bank) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 7,000,000 | a | 7,000,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Long Island University) (LOC; TD Bank) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 2,300,000 | a | 2,300,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) | 4.00 | 7/1/13 | 675,000 | | 697,545 |
New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(The College of New Rochelle) (LOC; RBS Citizens NA) | 0.25 | 8/7/12 | 3,915,000 | a | 3,915,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue, CP (Cornell University) | 0.18 | 10/11/12 | 5,750,000 | | 5,750,000 |
New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation, | | | | | |
State Personal Income Tax Revenue (Environment) | 3.00 | 12/15/12 | 200,000 | | 202,012 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency, Housing Revenue | | | | | |
(350 West 37th Street) (LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 9,000,000 | a,d | 9,000,000 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency, Housing | | | | | |
Revenue (360 West 43rd Street) (LOC; FNMA) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 4,200,000 | a,d | 4,200,000 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency, | | | | | |
Housing Revenue (600 West 42nd Street) (LOC; FNMA) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 7,335,000 | a,d | 7,335,000 |
32
| | | | | |
Dreyfus New York | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Municipal Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
New York (continued) | | | | | |
New York State Housing Finance Agency, | | | | | |
Housing Revenue (Capitol Green Apartments) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 4,000,000 | a,d | 4,000,000 |
New York State Housing Finance Agency, Service Contract | | | | | |
Revenue, Refunding (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.25 | 8/7/12 | 4,200,000 | a,d | 4,200,000 |
New York State Mortgage Agency, Homeowner Mortgage Revenue | 0.19 | 12/1/12 | 5,000,000 | d | 5,000,000 |
New York State Mortgage Agency, Homeowner Mortgage Revenue | 0.19 | 12/1/12 | 8,000,000 | d | 8,000,000 |
New York State Mortgage Agency, Homeowner Mortgage Revenue | 0.23 | 5/1/13 | 6,000,000 | d | 6,000,000 |
New York State Mortgage Agency, Homeowner Mortgage Revenue | 0.23 | 5/1/13 | 4,000,000 | d | 4,000,000 |
New York State Mortgage Agency, Homeowner Mortgage | | | | | |
Revenue (Liquidity Facility; Barclays Bank PLC) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 17,300,000 | a,d | 17,300,000 |
New York State Mortgage Agency, Homeowner Mortgage Revenue | | | | | |
(P-FLOATS Series MT-763) (Liquidity Facility; Bank of America) | 0.35 | 8/7/12 | 12,480,000 a,b,c,d | | 12,480,000 |
Odessa-Montour Central School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.50 | 6/14/13 | 3,600,000 | | 3,626,388 |
Onondaga County Industrial Development Agency, IDR | | | | | |
(ICM Controls Corporation Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.30 | 8/7/12 | 1,985,000 | a | 1,985,000 |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Equipment Notes | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 10,500,000 | a | 10,500,000 |
Putnam County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | | |
Revenue (United Cerebral Palsy of Putnam and | | | | | |
Southern Dutchess Project) (LOC; TD Bank) | 0.13 | 8/7/12 | 3,455,000 | a | 3,455,000 |
Schenectady Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | | |
Revenue (Union Graduate College Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 5,335,000 | a | 5,335,000 |
Sullivan County, GO Notes, TAN | 1.25 | 3/15/13 | 4,000,000 | | 4,018,476 |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, General | | | | | |
Revenue (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) (LOC; | | | | | |
California State Teachers Retirement System) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 6,850,000 | a | 6,850,000 |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, General Revenue, | | | | | |
Refunding (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) | 2.00 | 1/1/13 | 2,360,000 | | 2,377,437 |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, Subordinate Revenue, | | | | | |
Refunding (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) (Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | | |
Municipal Corp. and Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.42 | 8/7/12 | 13,320,000 | a | 13,320,000 |
Ulster County Industrial Development Agency, IDR | | | | | |
(Selux Corporation Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.30 | 8/7/12 | 845,000 | a | 845,000 |
Wells Fargo Stage Trust (Series 1C) (New York State Urban | | | | | |
Development Corporation, State Personal Income Tax | | | | | |
Revenue (General Purpose)) (Liquidity Facility; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 8,910,000 a,b,c | | 8,910,000 |
Wells Fargo Stage Trust (Series 98C) (Monroe County Industrial | | | | | |
Development Corporation, Revenue (University of Rochester Project)) | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Wells Fargo Bank and LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 7,510,000 a,b,c | | 7,510,000 |
Wells Fargo Stage Trust (Series 127C) (New York State | | | | | |
Dormitory Authority, State Personal Income Tax Revenue | | | | | |
(General Purpose)) (Liquidity Facility; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 7,760,000 a,b,c | | 7,760,000 |
Westchester County Industrial Development Agency, | | | | | |
Civic Facility Revenue (The Masters School Civic | | | | | |
Facility) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 5,400,000 | a | 5,400,000 |
Yonkers Industrial Development Agency, MFHR (Main Street | | | | | |
Lofts Yonkers LLC Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.31 | 8/7/12 | 30,000,000 | a,d | 30,000,000 |
The Funds 33
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus New York | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Municipal Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | |
U.S. Related—2.6% | | | | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax | | | | |
Revenue (Citigroup ROCS, Series RR II R-11765) | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Citibank NA) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 a,b,c | 10,000,000 |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax | | | | |
Revenue (Citigroup ROCS, Series RR II R-11996X) | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Citibank NA) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 3,045,000 a,b,c | 3,045,000 |
|
Total Investments (cost $491,255,998) | | | 99.8% | 491,255,998 |
Cash and Receivables (Net) | | | .2% | 748,175 |
Net Assets | | | 100.0% | 492,004,173 |
|
a Variable rate demand note—rate shown is the interest rate in effect at July 31, 2012. Maturity date represents the next demand date, or the ultimate maturity date if earlier. |
b Securities exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified |
institutional buyers.At July 31, 2012, these securities amounted to $57,775,000 or 11.7% of net assets. |
c The fund does not directly own the municipal security indicated; the fund owns an interest in a special purpose entity that, in turn, owns the underlying municipal security.The special |
purpose entity permits the fund to own interests in underlying assets, but in a manner structured to provide certain advantages not inherent in the underlying bonds (e.g., enhanced |
liquidity, yields linked to short-term rates). |
d At July 31, 2012, the fund had $141,635,000 or 28.8% of net assets invested in securities whose payment of principal and interest is dependent upon revenues generated from housing. |
e This security is prerefunded; the date shown represents the prerefunded date. Bonds which are prerefunded are collateralized by U.S. Government securities which are held in escrow and |
are used to pay principal and interest on the municipal issue and to retire the bonds in full at the earliest refunding date. |
| | | | | | |
Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited) | | | |
|
Fitch | | or | Moody’s | or | Standard & Poor’s | Value (%)† |
F1+,F1 | | | VMIG1,MIG1,P1 | | SP1+,SP1,A1+,A1 | 75.9 |
F2 | | | VMIG2,MIG3,P2 | | SP2,A2 | 3.8 |
AAA,AA,Af | | | Aaa,Aa,Af | | AAA,AA,Af | 6.9 |
Not Ratedg | | | Not Ratedg | | Not Ratedg | 13.4 |
| | | | | | 100.0 |
|
† Based on total investments. |
f Notes which are not F, MIG and SP rated are represented by bond ratings of the issuers. |
g Securities which, while not rated by Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, have been determined by the Manager to be of comparable quality to those rated securities in which the fund |
may invest. |
See Summary of Abbreviations on page 51.
See notes to financial statements.
34
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Cash Management | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments—100.0% | | | | | |
Alabama—2.9% | | | | | |
Chatom Industrial Development Board, Gulf Opportunity Zone | | | | | |
Revenue (PowerSouth Energy Cooperative Projects) | 0.30 | 8/7/12 | 15,000,000 | a | 15,000,000 |
Columbia Industrial Development Board, PCR, | | | | | |
Refunding (Alabama Power Company Project) | 0.17 | 8/1/12 | 7,000,000 | a | 7,000,000 |
Columbia Industrial Development Board, PCR, | | | | | |
Refunding (Alabama Power Company Project) | 0.17 | 8/1/12 | 1,400,000 | a | 1,400,000 |
Tuscaloosa County Industrial Development Authority, Gulf Opportunity | | | | | |
Zone Revenue (Hunt Refining Project) (LOC; Bank of Nova Scotia) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 15,000,000 | a | 15,000,000 |
Tuscaloosa County Industrial Development Authority, Gulf Opportunity | | | | | |
Zone Revenue (Hunt Refining Project) (LOC; Bank of Nova Scotia) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 20,000,000 | a | 20,000,000 |
Tuscaloosa County Industrial Development Authority, Gulf Opportunity | | | | | |
Zone Revenue (Hunt Refining Project) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 | a | 10,000,000 |
Arizona—1.7% | | | | | |
Deutsche Bank Spears/Lifers Trust (Series DBE-1082) (Arizona Health | | | | | |
Facilities Authority, Revenue (Catholic Healthcare West)) (Liquidity | | | | | |
Facility; Deutsche Bank AG and LOC; Deutsche Bank AG) | 0.22 | 8/7/12 | 18,250,000 a,b,c,d | | 18,250,000 |
Deutsche Bank Spears/Lifers Trust (Series DBE-1086) (Phoenix | | | | | |
Industrial Development Authority, Revenue) (Liquidity Facility; | | | | | |
Deutsche Bank AG and LOC; Deutsche Bank AG) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 20,695,000 a,b,d | | 20,695,000 |
California—4.1% | | | | | |
California Statewide Communities Development | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 5,000,000 | a,c | 5,000,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue, CP (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.25 | 9/19/12 | 12,500,000 | c | 12,500,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue, CP (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.23 | 10/11/12 | 13,000,000 | c | 13,000,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue, CP (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.25 | 10/18/12 | 12,000,000 | c | 12,000,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue, CP (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.25 | 12/13/12 | 40,000,000 | c | 40,000,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue, CP (Kaiser Permanente) | 0.23 | 1/14/13 | 14,000,000 | c | 14,000,000 |
Colorado—5.0% | | | | | |
Colorado Educational and Cultural Facilities Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue, Refunding (The Nature Conservancy Project) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 16,600,000 | a | 16,600,000 |
Denver Urban Renewal Authority, Stapleton Senior Tax | | | | | |
Increment Revenue (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 9,400,000 | a | 9,400,000 |
RBC Municipal Products Inc. Trust (Series C-11) (Meridian Village | | | | | |
Metropolitan District Number One, Improvement Revenue) (Liquidity | | | | | |
Facility; Royal Bank of Canada and LOC; Royal Bank of Canada) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 17,600,000 a,b,d | | 17,600,000 |
Sheridan Redevelopment Agency, Tax Increment Revenue, | | | | | |
Refunding (South Santa Fe Drive Corridor Redevelopment | | | | | |
Project) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 | a | 10,000,000 |
Southern Ute Indian Tribe of the Southern | | | | | |
Ute Indian Reservation, Revenue | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 65,300,000 | a | 65,300,000 |
The Funds 35
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
Connecticut—.4% | | | | | |
Bridgeport, GO Notes, TAN | 1.50 | 8/15/12 | 9,500,000 | | 9,504,353 |
Delaware—1.6% | | | | | |
Delaware Health Facilities Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Christiana Care Health Services) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 25,000,000 | a,c | 25,000,000 |
Delaware Health Facilities Authority, Revenue, CP | | | | | |
(Christiana Care Health Services) | 0.18 | 8/27/12 | 12,500,000 | c | 12,500,000 |
District of Columbia—3.6% | | | | | |
Anacostia Waterfront Corporation, PILOT Revenue | | | | | |
(MERLOTS-Series F02) (Liquidity Facility; | | | | | |
Wells Fargo Bank and LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 44,785,000 a,b,d | | 44,785,000 |
District of Columbia, Revenue (American Legacy Foundation Issue) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 22,000,000 | a | 22,000,000 |
District of Columbia, University Revenue | | | | | |
(American University Issue) (LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 17,000,000 | a | 17,000,000 |
Florida—2.3% | | | | | |
Collier County Health Facilities Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue, CP (Cleveland Clinic Health System) | 0.18 | 8/2/12 | 20,000,000 | c | 20,000,000 |
Sunshine State Governmental Financing Commission, | | | | | |
Revenue, CP (Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.25 | 8/23/12 | 8,510,000 | | 8,510,000 |
Sunshine State Governmental Financing Commission, | | | | | |
Revenue, CP (Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.21 | 10/4/12 | 25,000,000 | | 25,000,000 |
Georgia—2.7% | | | | | |
Cobb County, GO Notes, TAN | 1.50 | 11/30/12 | 18,000,000 | | 18,078,333 |
Georgia Municipal Gas Authority, Gas Revenue, | | | | | |
Refunding (Gas Portfolio III Project) | 2.00 | 11/13/12 | 12,000,000 | | 12,053,647 |
Monroe County Development Authority, PCR (Oglethorpe | | | | | |
Power Corporation Scherer Project) (LOC; Bank of Montreal) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 15,000,000 | a | 15,000,000 |
Municipal Gas Authority of Georgia Gas | | | | | |
Revenue (Gas Portfolio III Project) | 2.00 | 5/22/13 | 13,000,000 | | 13,175,320 |
Thomasville Hospital Authority, RAC (John D. Archbold Memorial | | | | | |
Hospital, Inc. Project) (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 5,040,000 | a,c | 5,040,000 |
Illinois—3.3% | | | | | |
Illinois Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue (Saint Xavier | | | | | |
University Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.22 | 8/7/12 | 9,005,000 | a | 9,005,000 |
Illinois Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue, CP | | | | | |
(LOC; Northern Trust Company) | 0.18 | 9/13/12 | 61,200,000 | | 61,200,000 |
Illinois Finance Authority, IDR (Fitzpatrick Brothers, Inc. | | | | | |
Project) (Liquidity Facility; Northern Trust Company) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 4,360,000 | a | 4,360,000 |
Lake County, MFHR (Whispering Oaks | | | | | |
Apartments Project) (LOC; FHLMC) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 3,250,000 | a | 3,250,000 |
Indiana—1.0% | | | | | |
Indiana Bond Bank, Advance Funding Program Notes | 1.25 | 1/3/13 | 8,000,000 | | 8,030,331 |
Indiana Finance Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Ascension Health Senior Credit Group) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 5,000,000 | a,c | 5,000,000 |
36
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
Indiana (continued) | | | | | |
Indiana Finance Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Ascension Health Senior Health Group) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 5,000,000 | a,c | 5,000,000 |
Indiana Finance Authority, Revenue, | | | | | |
Refunding (Trinity Health Credit Group) | 0.12 | 8/7/12 | 5,500,000 | a,c | 5,500,000 |
Kansas—.1% | | | | | |
Olathe, Health Facilities Revenue (Olathe Medical | | | | | |
Center) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.21 | 8/1/12 | 2,900,000 | a,c | 2,900,000 |
Kentucky—.7% | | | | | |
Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority, HR | | | | | |
(Baptist Healthcare System Obligated Group) | | | | | |
(LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 8,000,000 | a,c | 8,000,000 |
Warren County, HR, Refunding (Bowling Green-Warren | | | | | |
County Community Hospital Corporation Project) | | | | | |
(Insured; Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. and | | | | | |
Liquidity Facility; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.35 | 8/7/12 | 7,555,000 | a,c | 7,555,000 |
Louisiana—2.3% | | | | | |
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, HR (Touro Infirmary | | | | | |
Project) (P-FLOATS Series MT-202) (Liquidity Facility; | | | | | |
Bank of America and LOC; Bank of America) | 0.48 | 8/7/12 | 30,840,000 a,b,c,d | | 30,840,000 |
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Tiger Athletic Foundation Project) (LOC; FHLB) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 15,225,000 | a | 15,225,000 |
Port of New Orleans Board of Commissioners, | | | | | |
Subordinate Lien Revenue, Refunding (LOC; FHLB) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 8,875,000 | a | 8,875,000 |
Maine—.5% | | | | | |
Maine Finance Authority, Revenue (Waynflete | | | | | |
School Issue) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 10,870,000 | a | 10,870,000 |
Maryland—3.2% | | | | | |
Baltimore County Revenue Authority, | | | | | |
Golf System Revenue (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 2,700,000 | a | 2,700,000 |
Frederick County, Revenue | | | | | |
(Homewood, Inc. Facility) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 11,350,000 | a | 11,350,000 |
Frederick County, Revenue, Refunding (Manekin-Frederick | | | | | |
Associates Facility) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.27 | 8/7/12 | 1,880,000 | a | 1,880,000 |
Maryland Economic Development Corporation, | | | | | |
Revenue (Easter Seals Facility) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 6,525,000 | a | 6,525,000 |
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (De Matha Catholic High School Issue) | | | | | |
(LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 9,315,000 | a | 9,315,000 |
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue, CP (Johns Hopkins Health | | | | | |
System) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.23 | 8/10/12 | 10,000,000 | c | 10,000,000 |
Maryland Health and Higher Educational Facilities Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue, CP (Johns Hopkins Health Systems) | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.20 | 9/5/12 | 13,085,000 | c | 13,085,000 |
The Funds 37
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | |
Maryland (continued) | | | | |
Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, | | | | |
Recovery Zone Facility Revenue (Wexford Maryland | | | | |
BioPark 3, LLC Facility) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 20,000,000a | 20,000,000 |
Massachusetts—.9% | | | | |
Lawrence, GO Notes, BAN (State Qualified Deficit Financing) | 1.50 | 6/1/13 | 4,500,000 | 4,538,083 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, General Transportation | | | | |
System Revenue (Liquidity Facility; Bank of America) | 0.22 | 8/7/12 | 3,150,000a | 3,150,000 |
Massachusetts Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | | | | |
Revenue (Partners HealthCare System Issue) | 0.12 | 8/7/12 | 12,750,000a,c | 12,750,000 |
Michigan—3.7% | | | | |
Board of Trustees of the Michigan State University, CP | 0.16 | 8/20/12 | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 |
Board of Trustees of the Michigan State University, CP | 0.19 | 10/22/12 | 15,000,000 | 15,000,000 |
University of Michigan, CP | 0.19 | 10/22/12 | 40,200,000 | 40,200,000 |
University of Michigan Regents, General Revenue | 0.12 | 8/7/12 | 6,200,000a | 6,200,000 |
Waterford Charter Township Economic Development Corporation, | | | | |
LOR, Refunding (Canterbury Health Care, Inc. Project) (LOC; FHLB) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 10,065,000a,c | 10,065,000 |
Minnesota—1.7% | | | | |
Rochester, Health Care Facilities Revenue, CP | | | | |
(Mayo Clinic) (Liquidity Facility; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.19 | 10/10/12 | 20,000,000c | 20,000,000 |
University of Minnesota, CP | 0.19 | 12/10/12 | 20,000,000 | 20,000,000 |
Mississippi—.6% | | | | |
Mississippi Business Finance Corporation, | | | | |
Gulf Opportunity Zone IDR (Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Project) | 0.15 | 8/1/12 | 5,000,000a | 5,000,000 |
Mississippi Hospital Equipment and Facilities Authority, | | | | |
Revenue (Baptist Memorial Health Care) | 0.21 | 1/9/13 | 10,000,000c | 10,000,000 |
Missouri—3.1% | | | | |
Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Health Facilities | | | | |
Revenue (SSM Health Care) (Liquidity Facility; Citibank NA) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 46,750,000a,c | 46,750,000 |
Missouri Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | | | | |
Revenue (Ascension Health Senior Health Group) | 0.13 | 8/7/12 | 7,100,000a,c | 7,100,000 |
Saint Louis, General Revenue Fund, TRAN | 2.00 | 5/30/13 | 20,000,000 | 20,294,333 |
Nebraska—1.0% | | | | |
Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, | | | | |
SFHR (Liquidity Facility; FHLB) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 24,500,000a | 24,500,000 |
Nevada—5.1% | | | | |
Austin Trust (Series 1171) (Clark County, GO Bond | | | | |
Bank Bonds) (Liquidity Facility; Bank of America) | 0.23 | 8/7/12 | 9,770,000 a,b,d | 9,770,000 |
Clark County, Airport System Junior Subordinate Lien Revenue | 2.00 | 7/1/13 | 36,000,000 | 36,542,071 |
Clark County, Airport System Subordinate | | | | |
Lien Revenue (LOC; Citibank NA) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 8,100,000a | 8,100,000 |
Las Vegas Valley Water District, CP | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.20 | 10/11/12 | 40,000,000 | 40,000,000 |
Las Vegas Valley Water District, CP (LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.20 | 10/22/12 | 25,000,000 | 25,000,000 |
38
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
New Hampshire—.4% | | | | | |
New Hampshire Health and Education Facilities Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (University System of New Hampshire Issue) | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.18 | 8/1/12 | 10,000,000 | a | 10,000,000 |
New Jersey—.2% | | | | | |
Egg Harbor Township, GO Notes, BAN | 1.00 | 9/13/12 | 5,430,000 | | 5,431,577 |
New Mexico—.3% | | | | | |
Alamogordo, Hospital Improvement Revenue, Refunding (Gerald | | | | | |
Champion Regional Medical Center Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.23 | 8/7/12 | 8,000,000 | a,c | 8,000,000 |
New York—4.0% | | | | | |
Dutchess County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | | |
(Anderson Foundation for Autism, Inc. Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 8,200,000 | a | 8,200,000 |
JPMorgan Chase Putters/Drivers Trust (Series 4089) (New York State | | | | | |
Thruway Authority, Second General Highway Bridge Trust Fund | | | | | |
Revenue) (Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.18 | 8/1/12 | 20,000,000 a,b,d | | 20,000,000 |
Nassau County Interim Finance Authority, Sales Tax Secured | | | | | |
Revenue (Liquidity Facility; Bank of America) | 0.26 | 8/7/12 | 21,600,000 | a | 21,600,000 |
New York City, GO Notes (LOC; Citibank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 20,000,000 | a | 20,000,000 |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, CP | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.20 | 9/7/12 | 15,000,000 | | 15,000,000 |
Tompkins County Industrial Development Agency, | | | | | |
Civic Facility Revenue (Community Development | | | | | |
Properties Ithaca, Inc. Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.25 | 8/7/12 | 9,350,000 | a | 9,350,000 |
North Carolina—.6% | | | | | |
North Carolina Medical Care Commission, Health Care Facilities | | | | | |
First Mortgage Revenue (Deerfield Episcopal Retirement | | | | | |
Community) (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 15,035,000 | a,c | 15,035,000 |
Ohio—1.4% | | | | | |
Akron, GO Notes, BAN (Various Purpose) | 1.13 | 11/15/12 | 10,000,000 | | 10,015,085 |
Allen County, Hospital Facilities Revenue, (Catholic Health Partners) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 7,500,000 | a,c | 7,500,000 |
Lucas County, GO Notes, BAN (Various Purpose Improvement Notes) | 1.00 | 7/18/13 | 2,550,000 | | 2,565,375 |
Ohio Higher Education Facility CP (Cleveland Clinic) | 0.19 | 9/6/12 | 13,000,000 | c | 13,000,000 |
Oregon—.2% | | | | | |
Oregon, GO Notes (Veterans’ Welfare Bonds) | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 5,250,000 | a | 5,250,000 |
Pennsylvania—10.9% | | | | | |
Bucks County Industrial Development Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Pennswood Village Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.32 | 8/7/12 | 8,400,000 | a,c | 8,400,000 |
Chester County Health and Education Facilities Authority, Mortgage | | | | | |
Revenue (Tel Hai Obligated Group Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 6,190,000 | a,c | 6,190,000 |
Cumberland County Municipal Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Presbyterian Homes, Inc. Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 7,840,000 | a | 7,840,000 |
Delaware County Industrial Development Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue, Refunding (Resource Recovery Facilty) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 4,100,000 | a | 4,100,000 |
The Funds 39
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
Pennsylvania (continued) | | | | | |
East Hempfield Township Industrial Development Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (The Mennonite Home Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 10,870,000 | a,c | 10,870,000 |
East Hempfield Township Industrial Development Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (The Mennonite Home Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 5,655,000 | a,c | 5,655,000 |
Emmaus General Authority (Pennsylvania Variable Rate Loan | | | | | |
Program) (Insured; Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. and | | | | | |
Liquidity Facility; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.23 | 8/7/12 | 24,915,000 | a | 24,915,000 |
Emmaus General Authority, Local Government Revenue | | | | | |
(Bond Pool Program) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 | a | 10,000,000 |
Emmaus General Authority, Local Government Revenue | | | | | |
(Bond Pool Program) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 13,500,000 | a | 13,500,000 |
Emmaus General Authority, Local Government Revenue | | | | | |
(Bond Pool Program) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 6,000,000 | a | 6,000,000 |
Emmaus General Authority, Local Government Revenue | | | | | |
(Bond Pool Program) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 11,100,000 | a | 11,100,000 |
Emmaus General Authority, Local Government Revenue | | | | | |
(Bond Pool Program) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 12,100,000 | a | 12,100,000 |
Emmaus General Authority, Local Government Revenue | | | | | |
(Bond Pool Program) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 | a | 10,000,000 |
Emmaus General Authority, Local Government Revenue | | | | | |
(Bond Pool Program) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 9,300,000 | a | 9,300,000 |
Emmaus General Authority, Local Government Revenue | | | | | |
(Bond Pool Program) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 | a | 10,000,000 |
General Authority of South Central Pennsylvania, | | | | | |
Revenue (Lutheran Social Services of South Central | | | | | |
Pennsylvania Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 15,650,000 | a | 15,650,000 |
Horizon Hospital System Authority, Senior Health and Housing | | | | | |
Facilities Revenue (Saint Paul Homes Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 9,500,000 | a,c | 9,500,000 |
Lancaster County Hospital Authority, Health Center | | | | | |
Revenue (LUTHERCARE Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 31,706,000 | a,c | 31,706,000 |
Lancaster County Hospital Authority, Revenue (Landis Home | | | | | |
Retirement Community Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 7,970,000 | a,c | 7,970,000 |
Pittsburgh and Allegheny County Sports and Exhibition Authority, | | | | | |
Commonwealth LR (Insured; Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. | | | | | |
and Liquidity Facility; PNC Bank NA) | 0.47 | 8/7/12 | 30,000,000 | a | 30,000,000 |
Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority, Water and Sewer First Lien | | | | | |
Revenue, Refunding (Insured; Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. | | | | | |
and Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.40 | 8/7/12 | 8,275,000 | a | 8,275,000 |
Ridley School District, GO Notes (LOC; TD Bank) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 2,700,000 | a | 2,700,000 |
York General Authority, Revenue (Strand-Capitol | | | | | |
Performing Arts Center Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 2,025,000 | a | 2,025,000 |
40
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
South Carolina—.9% | | | | | |
Charleston County School District, GO Notes, BAN | 2.00 | 11/6/12 | 20,000,000 | | 20,096,779 |
Tennessee—5.5% | | | | | |
Blount County Public Building Authority, Local Government | | | | | |
Public Improvement Revenue (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 9,085,000 | a | 9,085,000 |
Blount County Public Building Authority, Local Government | | | | | |
Public Improvement Revenue (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 3,045,000 | a | 3,045,000 |
Blount County Public Building Authority, Local Government | | | | | |
Public Improvement Revenue (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 6,000,000 | a | 6,000,000 |
Blount County Public Building Authority, Local Government | | | | | |
Public Improvement Revenue (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 47,210,000 | a | 47,210,000 |
Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson | | | | | |
County, Water and Sewer Revenue, CP | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.25 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 | | 10,000,000 |
Shelby County Health, Educational and Housing Facility Board, | | | | | |
Revenue (Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare) (Insured; Assured | | | | | |
Guaranty Municipal Corp. and Liquidity Facility; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.38 | 8/7/12 | 25,000,000 | a,c | 25,000,000 |
Tennessee, CP | 0.20 | 10/4/12 | 10,000,000 | | 10,000,000 |
Tennessee, CP (Liquidity Facility; | | | | | |
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System) | 0.19 | 11/7/12 | 20,000,000 | | 20,000,000 |
Texas—13.9% | | | | | |
Dallas, Waterworks and Sewer System Revenue, CP | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility: California State Teachers Retirement | | | | | |
System and State Street Bank and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/10/12 | 41,950,000 | | 41,950,000 |
El Paso, Water and Sewer Revenue, CP | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.24 | 1/14/13 | 5,000,000 | | 5,000,000 |
Harris County Industrial Development Corporation, | | | | | |
Marine Terminal Revenue (HFOTCO LLC | | | | | |
Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 25,000,000 | a | 25,000,000 |
Houston, Utility System Revenue, CP (LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.21 | 9/10/12 | 10,000,000 | | 10,000,000 |
Jefferson County Industrial Development Corporation, | | | | | |
Hurricane Ike Disaster Area Revenue (Jefferson | | | | | |
Refinery, L.L.C. Project) (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.45 | 9/27/12 | 5,665,000 | | 5,665,000 |
Jefferson County Industrial Development Corporation, | | | | | |
Hurricane Ike Disaster Area Revenue (Jefferson | | | | | |
Refinery, L.L.C. Project) (LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.45 | 9/27/12 | 50,300,000 | | 50,300,000 |
RBC Municipal Products Inc. Trust (Series E-27) (Harris County | | | | | |
Health Facilities Development Corporation, HR, Refunding | | | | | |
(Memorial Hermann Healthcare System)) (Liquidity Facility; | | | | | |
Royal Bank of Canada and LOC; Royal Bank of Canada) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000 a,b,c,d | | 10,000,000 |
Red River Education Finance Corporation, Higher Education | | | | | |
Revenue (Texas Christian University Project) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 26,000,000 | a | 26,000,000 |
The Funds 41
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
Texas (continued) | | | | | |
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance | | | | | |
Corporation, HR (Baylor Health Care System Project) | | | | | |
(LOC; Northern Trust Company) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 3,500,000 | a,c | 3,500,000 |
Tarrant County Health Facilities Development Corporation, | | | | | |
HR (Cook Children’s Medical Center Project) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 36,300,000 | a,c | 36,300,000 |
Tarrant Regional Water District, | | | | | |
Water Improvement Revenue, Refunding | 5.00 | 3/1/13 | 1,800,000 | | 1,848,793 |
Texas, TRAN | 2.50 | 8/30/12 | 5,000,000 | | 5,009,250 |
Texas Municipal Power Agency, Revenue, CP | | | | | |
(LOC: Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.26 | 8/14/12 | 33,800,000 | | 33,800,000 |
Texas Public Finance Authority, CP | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.19 | 8/16/12 | 24,000,000 | | 24,000,000 |
Texas Transportation Commission, GO Notes | | | | | |
(Mobility Fund) (Liquidity Facility; Royal Bank of Canada) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 14,320,000 | a | 14,320,000 |
Texas Water Development Board, State Revolving Fund | | | | | |
Subordinate Lien Revenue (Citigroup ROCS, | | | | | |
Series RR II R-11746) (Liquidity Facility; Citibank NA) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 10,940,000 a,b,d | | 10,940,000 |
University of Texas, University Revenue, CP | 0.16 | 8/21/12 | 21,000,000 | | 21,000,000 |
Utah—1.6% | | | | | |
Murray City, HR (Intermountain Health Care Health Services, Inc.) | 0.13 | 8/7/12 | 32,000,000 | a,c | 32,000,000 |
Murray City, HR (Intermountain Health Care Health Services, Inc.) | 0.13 | 8/7/12 | 100,000 | a,c | 100,000 |
Utah Housing Finance Agency, MFHR, Refunding (Candlestick | | | | | |
Apartments Project) (Liquidity Facility; FNMA and LOC; FNMA) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 6,400,000 | a | 6,400,000 |
Virginia—.6% | | | | | |
Harrisonburg Industrial Development Authority, Revenue, | | | | | |
Refunding (Virginia Mennonite Retirement Community) | | | | | |
(LOC; Branch Banking and Trust Co.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 6,750,000 | a,c | 6,750,000 |
University of Virginia, University Revenue, CP | 0.19 | 12/10/12 | 7,000,000 | | 7,000,000 |
Washington—1.6% | | | | | |
Washington, Various Purpose GO, Refunding (P-FLOATS | | | | | |
Series PT-4658) (Liquidity Facility; Bank of America) | 0.23 | 8/7/12 | 18,185,000 a,b,d | | 18,185,000 |
Wells Fargo Stage Trust (Series 36C) (Washington Health Care | | | | | |
Facilities Authority, Revenue (PeaceHealth)) (Liquidity | | | | | |
Facility; Wells Fargo Bank and LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 19,995,000 a,b,c,d | | 19,995,000 |
Wisconsin—4.5% | | | | | |
Milwaukee, GO Cash Flow Promissory Notes | 1.25 | 12/4/12 | 16,000,000 | | 16,058,756 |
Milwaukee Redevelopment Authority, Redevelopment LR (University | | | | | |
of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Kenilworth Project) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 6,170,000 | a | 6,170,000 |
42
| | | | | |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | |
Wisconsin (continued) | | | | |
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, Revenue | | | | |
(Ascension Health Senior Credit Group) (Eclipse Funding Trust) | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; U.S. Bank NA and LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 23,020,000 a,b,c,d | 23,020,000 |
Wisconsin Health and Educational Facilities Authority, | | | | |
Revenue (Aurora Health Care, Inc.) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.27 | 2/5/13 | 60,000,000c | 60,000,000 |
Wyoming—1.3% | | | | |
Wyoming Student Loan Corporation, Student Loan | | | | |
Revenue, Refunding (LOC; Royal Bank of Canada) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 30,000,000a | 30,000,000 |
U.S. Related—.6% | | | | |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax | | | | |
Revenue (Citigroup ROCS, Series RR II R-11765) | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Citibank NA) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 14,815,000 a,b,d | 14,815,000 |
|
Total Investments (cost $2,355,123,086) | | | 100.0% | 2,355,123,086 |
Cash and Receivables (Net) | | | .0% | 697,398 |
Net Assets | | | 100.0% | 2,355,820,484 |
|
a Variable rate demand note—rate shown is the interest rate in effect at July 31, 2012. Maturity date represents the next demand date, or the ultimate maturity date if earlier. |
b Securities exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified |
institutional buyers.At July 31, 2012, these securities amounted to $258,895,000 or 11.0% of net assets. |
c At July 31, 2012, the fund had $712,326,000 or 30.2% of net assets invested in securities whose payment of principal and interest is dependent upon revenues generated from health care. |
d The fund does not directly own the municipal security indicated; the fund owns an interest in a special purpose entity that, in turn, owns the underlying municipal security.The special |
purpose entity permits the fund to own interests in underlying assets, but in a manner structured to provide certain advantages not inherent in the underlying bonds (e.g., |
enhanced liquidity, yields linked to short-term rates). |
| | | | | | |
Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited) | | | |
|
Fitch | | or | Moody’s | or | Standard & Poor’s | Value (%)† |
F1+,F1 | | | VMIG1,MIG1,P1 | | SP1+,SP1,A1+,A1 | 98.4 |
AAA,AA,Ae | | | Aaa,Aa,Ae | | AAA,AA,Ae | 1.6 |
| | | | | | 100.0 |
| |
† | Based on total investments. |
e | Notes which are not F, MIG and SP rated are represented by bond ratings of the issuers. |
See Summary of Abbreviations on page 51.
See notes to financial statements.
The Funds 43
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Municipal Cash Management | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments—99.9% | | | | |
ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corporations, | | | | |
Revenue (Santa Cruz Montessori School) (LOC; Comerica Bank) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 765,000a,b | 765,000 |
ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corporations, Revenue, | | | | |
Refunding (Eskaton Properties, Inc.) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 14,920,000a | 14,920,000 |
Alameda County Industrial Development Authority, Recovery Zone | | | | |
Facility Revenue (Dale Hardware, Inc. Project) (LOC; Comerica Bank) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 2,670,000a | 2,670,000 |
Alameda County Industrial Development Authority, | | | | |
Revenue (Santini Foods, Inc. Project) (LOC; Comerica Bank) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 2,900,000a | 2,900,000 |
Antelope Valley Community College District, GO Notes, TRAN | 2.00 | 11/30/12 | 2,300,000b | 2,312,700 |
Banning Unified School District, GO Notes, TRAN | 2.00 | 10/1/12 | 2,500,000b | 2,506,821 |
California, GO Notes (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.13 | 8/1/12 | 2,000,000a | 2,000,000 |
California Enterprise Development Authority, IDR | | | | |
(JBR, Inc. Project) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 4,000,000a | 4,000,000 |
California Enterprise Development Authority, IDR | | | | |
(Tri Tool Inc. Project) (LOC; Comerica Bank) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 10,000,000a | 10,000,000 |
California Enterprise Development Authority, Recovery Zone | | | | |
Facility Revenue (Regional Properties, Inc. Project) (LOC; FHLB) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 13,400,000a | 13,400,000 |
California Health Facilities Financing Authority, | | | | |
Health Facility Revenue (Catholic Healthcare | | | | |
West Loan Program) (LOC; Citibank NA) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 6,600,000a | 6,600,000 |
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, Revenue | | | | |
(Orange County Performing Arts Center) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.22 | 8/7/12 | 15,975,000a | 15,975,000 |
California Infrastructure and Economic | | | | |
Development Bank, Revenue (Southern California | | | | |
Public Radio Project) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.19 | 8/1/12 | 2,810,000a | 2,810,000 |
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, | | | | |
Revenue (SRI International) (LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 2,665,000a | 2,665,000 |
California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, | | | | |
Revenue (The Westmark School Project) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 6,570,000a,b | 6,570,000 |
California Municipal Finance Authority, Revenue | | | | |
(Notre Dame High School, San Jose) (LOC; Comerica Bank) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 1,000,000a,b | 1,000,000 |
California Municipal Finance Authority, | | | | |
Revenue (Trinity School) (LOC; Comerica Bank) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 680,000a,b | 680,000 |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, SWDR | | | | |
(Athens Services Project) (LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 22,365,000a | 22,365,000 |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, SWDR | | | | |
(Big Bear Disposal, Inc. Project) (LOC; Union Bank NA) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 2,425,000a | 2,425,000 |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, SWDR | | | | |
(Garden City Sanitation, Inc. Project) (LOC; Comerica Bank) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 1,770,000a | 1,770,000 |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, SWDR | | | | |
(Garden City Sanitation, Inc. Project) (LOC; Union Bank NA) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 8,130,000a | 8,130,000 |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, SWDR | | | | |
(Mission Trail Waste Systems, Inc. Project) (LOC; Comerica Bank) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 2,840,000a | 2,840,000 |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, SWDR | | | | |
(South Bay Recycling Project) (LOC; Union Bank NA) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 2,650,000a | 2,650,000 |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, SWDR, Refunding | | | | |
(BLT Enterprises of Fremont LLC Project) (LOC; Union Bank NA) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 9,065,000a | 9,065,000 |
44
| | | | | |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Municipal Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
California Pollution Control Financing Authority, SWDR, Refunding | | | | | |
(MarBorg Industries Project) (LOC; Union Bank NA) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 3,035,000 | a | 3,035,000 |
California School Cash Reserve Program Authority, Revenue | 2.00 | 12/31/12 | 16,500,000 | b | 16,602,659 |
California School Cash Reserve Program Authority, Revenue | 2.00 | 2/1/13 | 11,480,000 | b | 11,559,854 |
California School Cash Reserve Program Authority, Revenue | 2.00 | 4/26/13 | 3,500,000 | b | 3,538,905 |
California School Cash Reserve Program Authority, Revenue | 2.00 | 4/26/13 | 17,700,000 | b | 17,896,748 |
California School Cash Reserve Program Authority, Revenue | 2.00 | 6/3/13 | 2,000,000 | b | 2,024,990 |
California Statewide Communities Development | | | | | |
Authority, Revenue (Metropolitan Area Advisory | | | | | |
Committee Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.44 | 8/7/12 | 1,915,000 | a | 1,915,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (The Pegasus School) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.44 | 8/7/12 | 1,840,000 | a,b | 1,840,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Tiger Woods Learning Center Foundation) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.55 | 8/7/12 | 2,275,000 | a,b | 2,275,000 |
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, | | | | | |
Revenue (Trinity Children and Family Services Project) | | | | | |
(LOC; California State Teachers Retirement System) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 500,000 | a | 500,000 |
Deutsche Bank Spears/Lifers Trust (Series DBE-525) | | | | | |
(Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corporation, Enhanced | | | | | |
Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Bonds) (Liquidity Facility; | | | | | |
Deutsche Bank AG and LOC; Deutsche Bank AG) | 0.25 | 8/7/12 | 5,010,000 a,c,d | | 5,010,000 |
Deutsche Bank Spears/Lifers Trust (Series DBE-561) | | | | | |
(Azusa Public Financing Authority, Parity Revenue | | | | | |
(Water System Capital Improvements Program) (Liquidity | | | | | |
Facility; Deutsche Bank AG and LOC; Deutsche Bank AG) | 0.25 | 8/7/12 | 5,130,000 a,c,d | | 5,130,000 |
Deutsche Bank Spears/Lifers Trust (Series DBE-575) | | | | | |
(Elk Grove Finance Authority, Special Tax Revenue) (Liquidity | | | | | |
Facility; Deutsche Bank AG and LOC; Deutsche Bank AG) | 0.25 | 8/7/12 | 5,025,000 a,c,d | | 5,025,000 |
Deutsche Bank Spears/Lifers Trust (Series DBE-1013) | | | | | |
(Fontana Public Financing Authority, Tax Allocation Revenue | | | | | |
(North Fontana Redevelopment Project)) (Liquidity Facility; | | | | | |
Deutsche Bank AG and LOC; Deutsche Bank AG) | 0.30 | 8/7/12 | 4,200,000 a,c,d | | 4,200,000 |
Los Angeles, COP (Notre Dame High School) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.32 | 8/7/12 | 5,000,000 | a,b | 5,000,000 |
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, | | | | | |
Proposition C Sales Tax Revenue, Refunding | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Mizuho Corporate Bank) | 0.14 | 8/1/12 | 2,200,000 | a | 2,200,000 |
Los Angeles County Schools Pooled Financing Program, | | | | | |
Pooled TRAN Participation Certificates (Certain Los Angeles | | | | | |
County Schools and Community College Districts) | 2.00 | 1/31/13 | 14,600,000 | b | 14,712,438 |
Los Angeles Municipal Improvement Corporation, | | | | | |
LR, CP (LOC; Wells Fargo Bank) | 0.20 | 8/10/12 | 3,000,000 | | 3,000,000 |
Menlo Park Community Development Agency, Tax Allocation | | | | | |
Revenue, Refunding (Las Pulgas Community Development | | | | | |
Project) (LOC; State Street Bank and Trust Co.) | 0.16 | 8/1/12 | 7,500,000 | a | 7,500,000 |
Orange County Irvine Coast Assessment District Number 88-1, | | | | | |
Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds (LOC; | | | | | |
Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corp.) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 8,600,000 | a | 8,600,000 |
The Funds 45
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Municipal Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | |
Pittsburg Redevelopment Agency, Subordinate Tax Allocation | | | | |
Revenue (Los Medanos Community Development Project) | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility: California State Teachers Retirement | | | | |
System and State Street Bank and Trust Co.) | 0.16 | 8/1/12 | 17,615,000a | 17,615,000 |
Ravenswood City School District, GO Notes, TRAN | 1.00 | 2/4/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,003,290 |
Redwood City School District, GO Notes, TRAN | 2.00 | 10/1/12 | 7,500,000 | 7,520,186 |
Riverside County Transportation Commission, | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue (Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 9,200,000a | 9,200,000 |
Sacramento City Financing Authority, Revenue, Refunding | | | | |
(Master Lease Program Facilities) (P-FLOATS Series PT-4698) | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Bank of America and LOC; Bank of America) | 0.40 | 8/7/12 | 12,995,000 a,c,d | 12,995,000 |
Sacramento County Housing Authority, MFHR, | | | | |
Refunding (Stonebridge Apartments) (LOC; FNMA) | 0.26 | 8/7/12 | 4,100,000a | 4,100,000 |
San Diego County COP (Museum of Contemporary Art | | | | |
San Diego) (LOC; Northern Trust Company) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 2,050,000a | 2,050,000 |
San Diego County and San Diego County School Districts, | | | | |
TRAN, Program Note Participations | 2.00 | 4/30/13 | 4,700,000b | 4,759,391 |
San Jose Redevelopment Agency, MFHR (101 San Fernando | | | | |
Apartments) (Citigroup ROCS, Series RR II R-13102CE) | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Citibank NA and LOC; Citibank NA) | 0.35 | 8/7/12 | 30,220,000 a,c,d | 30,220,000 |
San Pablo Redevelopment Agency, Subordinate Tax | | | | |
Allocation Revenue (Tenth Township Redevelopment | | | | |
Project) (LOC; Union Bank NA) | 0.16 | 8/1/12 | 20,165,000a | 20,165,000 |
Western Placer Unified School District, GO Notes, TRAN | 2.00 | 10/4/12 | 1,000,000b | 1,002,379 |
|
Total Investments (cost $373,215,361) | | | 99.9% | 373,215,361 |
Cash and Receivables (Net) | | | .1% | 294,484 |
Net Assets | | | 100.0% | 373,509,845 |
|
a Variable rate demand note—rate shown is the interest rate in effect at July 31, 2012. Maturity date represents the next demand date, or the ultimate maturity date if earlier. |
b At July 31, 2012, the fund had $95,046,885 or 25.4% of net assets invested in securities whose payment of principal and interest is dependent upon revenues generated from education. |
c Securities exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified |
institutional buyers.At July 31, 2012, these securities amounted to $62,580,000 or 16.8% of net assets. |
d The fund does not directly own the municipal security indicated; the fund owns an interest in a special purpose entity that, in turn, owns the underlying municipal security.The special |
purpose entity permits the fund to own interests in underlying assets, but in a manner structured to provide certain advantages not inherent in the underlying bonds (e.g., enhanced |
liquidity, yields linked to short-term rates). |
| | | | | | |
Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited) | | | |
|
Fitch | | or | Moody’s | or | Standard & Poor’s | Value (%)† |
F1+,F1 | | | VMIG1,MIG1,P1 | | SP1+,SP1,A1+,A1 | 92.3 |
F2 | | | VMIG2, MIG3, P2 | | SP2, A2 | 5.9 |
AAA,AA,Ae | | | Aaa,Aa,Ae | | AAA,AA,Ae | 1.8 |
| | | | | | 100.0 |
| |
† | Based on total investments. |
e | Notes which are not F, MIG and SP rated are represented by bond ratings of the issuers. |
See Summary of Abbreviations on page 51.
See notes to financial statements.
46
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Municipal Cash Management | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments—99.4% | | | | |
New York—97.3% | | | | |
Albany Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | |
(The College of Saint Rose Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.33 | 8/7/12 | 2,500,000a | 2,500,000 |
Albany Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | |
(The College of Saint Rose Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.33 | 8/7/12 | 2,800,000a | 2,800,000 |
Ausable Valley Central School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.50 | 4/5/13 | 1,500,000 | 1,507,766 |
Broome County Industrial Development Agency, Continuing | | | | |
Care Retirement Community Revenue (Good Shepherd | | | | |
Village at Endwell, Inc. Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 3,250,000a | 3,250,000 |
Campbell-Savona Central School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.50 | 6/21/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,007,314 |
Cayuga County, GO Notes, BAN | 1.25 | 2/8/13 | 1,000,000 | 1,003,370 |
Dutchess County Industrial Development Agency, | | | | |
Civic Facility Revenue (Anderson Foundation for | | | | |
Autism, Inc. Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 3,905,000a | 3,905,000 |
Dutchess County Industrial Development Agency, | | | | |
Revenue (Trinity-Pawling School Corporation | | | | |
Civic Facility) (LOC; PNC Bank NA) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 1,000,000a | 1,000,000 |
East Farmingdale Volunteer Fire Company Inc., | | | | |
Volunteer Fire Department Revenue (LOC; Citibank NA) | 0.59 | 8/7/12 | 4,005,000a | 4,005,000 |
Franklin County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue (Paul Smith’s College Project) (LOC; U.S. Bank NA) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 935,000a | 935,000 |
Franklin County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue (Trudeau Institute, Inc. Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.26 | 8/7/12 | 1,715,000a | 1,715,000 |
Franklin County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue (Trudeau Institute, Inc. Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.26 | 8/7/12 | 265,000a | 265,000 |
Hamburg Central School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.50 | 6/14/13 | 2,900,000 | 2,921,509 |
Hamburg Village, GO Notes, BAN | 1.00 | 7/18/13 | 2,400,000 | 2,409,165 |
Hornell City School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.25 | 6/28/13 | 1,500,000 | 1,507,427 |
Lancaster Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | |
Revenue (GreenField Manor, Inc. Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 1,900,000a | 1,900,000 |
Monroe County Industrial Development Agency, | | | | |
Civic Facility Revenue (Association for the Blind | | | | |
and Visually Impaired—Goodwill Industries of Greater | | | | |
Rochester, Inc. Project) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.17 | 8/7/12 | 1,000,000a | 1,000,000 |
Monroe County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | |
(Saint Ann’s Home for the Aged Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 3,475,000a | 3,475,000 |
Nassau County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | |
Improvement Revenue, Refunding (Cold Spring Harbor | | | | |
Laboratory Project) (Liquidity Facility; TD Bank) | 0.15 | 8/1/12 | 1,300,000a | 1,300,000 |
The Funds 47
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Municipal Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
New York (continued) | | | | | |
New York City, GO Notes (Liquidity Facility; Bank of Nova Scotia) | 0.13 | 8/7/12 | 7,000,000 | a | 7,000,000 |
New York City Capital Resource Corporation, Revenue | | | | | |
(Loan Enhanced Assistance Program—Cobble Hill Health | | | | | |
Center, Inc. Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.30 | 8/7/12 | 2,600,000 | a | 2,600,000 |
New York City Capital Resource Corporation, Revenue | | | | | |
(Loan Enhanced Assistance Program—Poly Prep | | | | | |
Country Day School Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.30 | 8/7/12 | 3,195,000 | a | 3,195,000 |
New York City Capital Resource Corporation, Revenue | | | | | |
(Loan Enhanced Assistance Program—Village Center | | | | | |
for Care Project) (LOC; Bank of America) | 0.25 | 8/7/12 | 1,175,000 | a | 1,175,000 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | | |
(Birch Wathen Lenox School Project) (LOC; TD Bank) | 0.23 | 8/7/12 | 4,200,000 | a | 4,200,000 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | | |
Revenue (Children’s Oncology Society of New York, Inc. | | | | | |
Project) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.19 | 8/7/12 | 2,600,000 | a | 2,600,000 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility Revenue | | | | | |
(Sephardic Community Youth Center, Inc. Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 4,700,000 | a | 4,700,000 |
New York City Industrial Development Agency, | | | | | |
Civic Facility Revenue (Spence-Chapin, Services | | | | | |
to Families and Children Project) (LOC; TD Bank) | 0.23 | 8/7/12 | 3,100,000 | a | 3,100,000 |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water and | | | | | |
Sewer System Revenue (Liquidity Facility; California | | | | | |
Public Employees Retirement System) | 0.14 | 8/1/12 | 8,065,000 | a | 8,065,000 |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water and Sewer | | | | | |
System Revenue (Liquidity Facility; Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd.) | 0.14 | 8/1/12 | 4,300,000 | a | 4,300,000 |
New York City Municipal Water Finance Authority, Water and | | | | | |
Sewer System Second General Resolution Revenue | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility: California State Teachers Retirement | | | | | |
System and State Street Bank and Trust Co.) | 0.16 | 8/1/12 | 1,600,000 | a | 1,600,000 |
New York City Transitional Finance Authority, | | | | | |
Future Tax Secured Revenue (Citigroup ROCS, | | | | | |
Series RR-II R-14022) (Liquidity Facility; Citibank NA) | 0.15 | 8/7/12 | 2,000,000 a,b,c | | 2,000,000 |
New York Liberty Development Corporation, | | | | | |
Liberty Revenue, Refunding (World Trade Center | | | | | |
Project Towers 3-4) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 1,035,000 | a | 1,035,000 |
New York Liberty Development Corporation, Recovery Zone Revenue | | | | | |
(3 World Trade Center Project) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 585,000 | a | 585,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Catholic Health System Obligated Group) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 3,570,000 | a | 3,570,000 |
New York State Dormitory Authority, Revenue | | | | | |
(Mount Saint Mary College) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 1,500,000 | a | 1,500,000 |
48
| | | | | |
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | | |
Municipal Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | | Value ($) |
|
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | | |
New York (continued) | | | | | |
New York State Housing Finance Agency, | | | | | |
Housing Revenue (Baisley Park Gardens) (LOC; Citibank NA) | 0.26 | 8/7/12 | 6,100,000 | a | 6,100,000 |
New York State Mortgage Agency, Homeowner Mortgage | | | | | |
Revenue (Citigroup ROCS, Series RR II R-11713) | | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Citibank NA) | 0.25 | 8/7/12 | 1,120,000 a,b,c | | 1,120,000 |
Niagara Area Development Corporation, Revenue (Niagara Falls | | | | | |
Memorial Medical Center Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank USA) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 1,000,000 | a | 1,000,000 |
Niagara Wheatfield Central School District, | | | | | |
GO Notes, BAN (Various Improvements) | 1.50 | 3/27/13 | 1,000,000 | | 1,005,503 |
Odessa-Montour Central School District, GO Notes, BAN | 1.50 | 6/14/13 | 1,100,000 | | 1,108,063 |
Orange County Industrial Development Agency, Civic Facility | | | | | |
Revenue (Tuxedo Park School Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 1,000,000 | a | 1,000,000 |
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Equipment Notes | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 2,800,000 | a | 2,800,000 |
Saratoga County Industrial Development Agency, | | | | | |
Civic Facility Revenue (The Saratoga Hospital | | | | | |
Project) (LOC; HSBC Bank PLC) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 1,000,000 | a | 1,000,000 |
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, | | | | | |
Civic Facility Revenue (Hampton Day School | | | | | |
Civic Facility) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 1,000,000 | a | 1,000,000 |
Suffolk County Water Authority, Revenue, | | | | | |
BAN (Liquidity Facility; Bank of Nova Scotia) | 0.13 | 8/7/12 | 2,000,000 | a | 2,000,000 |
Sullivan County, GO Notes, BAN | 1.25 | 3/8/13 | 1,200,000 | | 1,204,651 |
Sullivan County, GO Notes, BAN | 1.50 | 3/8/13 | 1,000,000 | | 1,005,070 |
Sullivan County, GO Notes, TAN | 1.25 | 3/15/13 | 1,000,000 | | 1,004,619 |
Syracuse Industrial Development Agency, | | | | | |
Civic Facility Revenue (Community Development | | | | | |
Properties—Vanderbilt/Larned Project) (LOC; M&T Trust) | 0.21 | 8/7/12 | 1,400,000 | a | 1,400,000 |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, General Revenue | | | | | |
(MTA Bridges and Tunnels) (LOC; California Public | | | | | |
Employees Retirement System) | 0.14 | 8/1/12 | 7,500,000 | a | 7,500,000 |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, General Revenue | | | | | |
(MTA Bridges and Tunnels) (LOC; California State | | | | | |
Teachers Retirement System) | 0.14 | 8/7/12 | 9,900,000 | a | 9,900,000 |
Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, Subordinate Revenue, | | | | | |
Refunding (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) (Insured; Assured Guaranty | | | | | |
Municipal Corp. and Liquidity Facility; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.42 | 8/7/12 | 4,100,000 | a | 4,100,000 |
West Genesee Central School District, GO Notes, RAN | 1.00 | 12/28/12 | 1,500,000 | | 1,502,433 |
Westchester County Industrial Development Agency, | | | | | |
Civic Facility Revenue (The Masters School Civic | | | | | |
Facility) (LOC; JPMorgan Chase Bank) | 0.20 | 8/7/12 | 1,850,000 | a | 1,850,000 |
The Funds 49
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
| | | | | |
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free | Coupon | Maturity | Principal | |
Municipal Cash Management (continued) | Rate (%) | Date | Amount ($) | Value ($) |
Short-Term Investments (continued) | | | | |
U.S. Related—2.1% | | | | |
Puerto Rico Commonwealth, Public Improvement GO | | | | |
Notes, Refunding (LOC; Barclays Bank PLC) | 0.16 | 8/7/12 | 2,000,000a | 2,000,000 |
Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation, Sales Tax | | | | |
Revenue (Citigroup ROCS, Series RR II R-11762) | | | | |
(Liquidity Facility; Citibank NA) | 0.18 | 8/7/12 | 1,000,000 a,b,c | 1,000,000 |
|
Total Investments (cost $140,231,890) | | | 99.4% | 140,231,890 |
Cash and Receivables (Net) | | | .6% | 892,417 |
Net Assets | | | 100.0% | 141,124,307 |
|
a Variable rate demand note—rate shown is the interest rate in effect at July 31, 2012. Maturity date represents the next demand date, or the ultimate maturity date if earlier. |
b Securities exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933.These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified |
institutional buyers.At July 31, 2012, these securities amounted to $4,120,000 or 2.9% of net assets. |
c The fund does not directly own the municipal security indicated; the fund owns an interest in a special purpose entity that, in turn, owns the underlying municipal security.The special |
purpose entity permits the fund to own interests in underlying assets, but in a manner structured to provide certain advantages not inherent in the underlying bonds (e.g., enhanced |
liquidity, yields linked to short-term rates). |
| | | | | | | |
| Summary of Combined Ratings (Unaudited) | | | |
|
| Fitch | | or | Moody’s | or | Standard & Poor’s | Value (%)† |
| F1+,F1 | | | VMIG1,MIG1,P1 | | SP1+,SP1,A1+,A1 | 71.2 |
| F-2 | | | VMIG2, MIG3, P2 | | SP2, A2 | 12.1 |
| AAA,AA,Ad | | | Aaa,Aa,Ad | | AAA,AA,Ad | 1.1 |
| Not Ratede | | | Not Ratede | | Not Ratede | 15.6 |
| | | | | | | 100.0 |
|
† Based on total investments. |
d Notes which are not F, MIG and SP rated are represented by bond ratings of the issuers. |
e Securities which, while not rated by Fitch, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, have been determined by the Manager to be of comparable quality to those rated securities in which the fund |
may invest. |
See Summary of Abbreviations on page 51.
See notes to financial statements.
50
| | | |
Summary of Abbreviations | | |
|
ABAG | Association of Bay Area Governments | ACA | American Capital Access |
AGC | ACE Guaranty Corporation | AGIC | Asset Guaranty Insurance Company |
AMBAC | American Municipal Bond Assurance Corporation | ARRN | Adjustable Rate Receipt Notes |
BAN | Bond Anticipation Notes | BPA | Bond Purchase Agreement |
CIFG | CDC Ixis Financial Guaranty | COP | Certificate of Participation |
CP | Commercial Paper | DRIVERS | Derivative Inverse Tax-Exempt Receipts |
EDR | Economic Development Revenue | EIR | Environmental Improvement Revenue |
FGIC | Financial Guaranty Insurance Company | FHA | Federal Housing Administration |
FHLB | Federal Home Loan Bank | FHLMC | Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation |
FNMA | Federal National Mortgage Association | GAN | Grant Anticipation Notes |
GIC | Guaranteed Investment Contract | GNMA | Government National Mortgage Association |
GO | General Obligation | HR | Hospital Revenue |
IDB | Industrial Development Board | IDC | Industrial Development Corporation |
IDR | Industrial Development Revenue | LIFERS | Long Inverse Floating Exempt Receipts |
LOC | Letter of Credit | LOR | Limited Obligation Revenue |
LR | Lease Revenue | MERLOTS | Municipal Exempt Receipt Liquidity Option Tender |
MFHR | Multi-Family Housing Revenue | MFMR | Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue |
PCR | Pollution Control Revenue | PILOT | Payment in Lieu of Taxes |
P-FLOATS | Puttable Floating Option Tax-Exempt Receipts | PUTTERS | Puttable Tax-Exempt Receipts |
RAC | Revenue Anticipation Certificates | RAN | Revenue Anticipation Notes |
RAW | Revenue Anticipation Warrants | ROCS | Reset Options Certificates |
RRR | Resources Recovery Revenue | SAAN | State Aid Anticipation Notes |
SBPA | Standby Bond Purchase Agreement | SFHR | Single Family Housing Revenue |
SFMR | Single Family Mortgage Revenue | SONYMA | State of New York Mortgage Agency |
SPEARS | Short Puttable Exempt Adjustable Receipts | SWDR | Solid Waste Disposal Revenue |
TAN | Tax Anticipation Notes | TAW | Tax Anticipation Warrants |
TRAN | Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes | XLCA | XL Capital Assurance |
The Funds 51
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
(amounts in thousands, except Net Asset Value Per Share)
July 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Dreyfus | Dreyfus | Dreyfus | Dreyfus |
| Dreyfus | Government | Government | Treasury & | Treasury |
| Cash | Cash | Prime Cash | Agency Cash | Prime Cash |
| Management | Management | Management | Management | Management |
Assets ($): | | | | | |
Investments at value—Note 1(a,b)† | 26,294,419a | 17,316,022a | 4,501,164 | 18,181,055a | 31,072,261 |
Cash | 9,722 | 632 | 106 | 630 | — |
Interest receivable | 12,991 | 23,256 | 6,213 | 33,753 | 35,230 |
Receivable for beneficial interest sold | 3 | 28 | — | — | — |
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 221 | 182 | 112 | 171 | 206 |
| 26,317,356 | 17,340,120 | 4,507,595 | 18,215,609 | 31,107,697 |
Liabilities ($): | | | | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 2(c) | 5,117 | 2,653 | 523 | 2,276 | 2,309 |
Cash overdraft due to Custodian | — | — | — | — | 405 |
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | 1,485 | 15 | — | — | 2 |
Payable for investment securities purchased | — | — | — | — | 1,899,882 |
Accrued expenses | 173 | 130 | 67 | 110 | 159 |
| 6,775 | 2,798 | 590 | 2,386 | 1,902,757 |
Net Assets ($) | 26,310,581 | 17,337,322 | 4,507,005 | 18,213,223 | 29,204,940 |
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | | | |
Paid-in capital | 26,310,370 | 17,337,297 | 4,507,048 | 18,213,204 | 29,205,169 |
Accumulated distributions in | | | | | |
excess of investment income—net | (2) | — | — | — | — |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | 213 | 25 | (43) | 19 | (229) |
Net Assets ($) | 26,310,581 | 17,337,322 | 4,507,005 | 18,213,223 | 29,204,940 |
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | 21,157,239 | 13,998,858 | 3,117,936 | 14,647,274 | 21,234,996 |
Shares Outstanding | 21,157,063 | 13,998,868 | 3,117,966 | 14,647,261 | 21,235,152 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Investor Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | 3,431,806 | 1,751,091 | 452,664 | 2,093,350 | 4,063,713 |
Shares Outstanding | 3,431,787 | 1,751,091 | 452,670 | 2,093,347 | 4,063,757 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
52
| | | | | |
| | Dreyfus | Dreyfus | Dreyfus | Dreyfus |
| Dreyfus | Government | Government | Treasury & | Treasury |
| Cash | Cash | Prime Cash | Agency Cash | Prime Cash |
| Management | Management | Management | Management | Management |
Net Asset Value Per Share (continued) | | | | | |
Administrative Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | 771,321 | 993,276 | 685,601 | 579,237 | 797,183 |
Shares Outstanding | 771,316 | 993,274 | 685,607 | 579,236 | 797,188 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Participant Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | 793,524 | 244,182 | 205,316 | 803,925 | 3,051,918 |
Shares Outstanding | 793,514 | 244,181 | 205,321 | 803,924 | 3,051,943 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Service Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | — | — | — | 23,851 | — |
Shares Outstanding | — | — | — | 23,850 | — |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | — | — | — | 1.00 | — |
Select Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | — | — | — | 6,459 | — |
Shares Outstanding | — | — | — | 6,459 | — |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | — | — | — | 1.00 | — |
Agency Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | 156,691 | 349,915 | 45,488 | 34,995 | 57,130 |
Shares Outstanding | 156,690 | 349,914 | 45,488 | 34,995 | 57,129 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Premier Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | — | — | — | 24,132 | — |
Shares Outstanding | — | — | — | 24,132 | — |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | — | — | — | 1.00 | — |
† Investments at cost ($) | 26,294,419 | 17,316,022 | 4,501,164 | 18,181,055 | 31,072,261 |
|
a Amount includes repurchase agreements of $4,742,000,000, $8,386,000,000 and $9,473,000,000 for Dreyfus Cash Management, Dreyfus Government Cash Management and |
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management, respectively, See Note 1(c). |
See notes to financial statements.
The Funds 53
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES (continued)
(amounts in thousands, except Net Asset Value Per Share)
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | |
| | | | Dreyfus | Dreyfus |
| Dreyfus | Dreyfus | Dreyfus | California | New York |
Municipal Cash | New York | Tax Exempt | AMT-Free | AMT-Free |
Management | Municipal Cash | Cash Municipal Cash | Municipal Cash |
| Plus | Management | Management | Management | Management |
Assets ($): | | | | | |
Investments at value—Note 1(a,b)† | 748,881 | 491,256 | 2,355,123 | 373,215 | 140,232 |
Cash | 1,325 | 454 | — | — | 820 |
Interest receivable | 504 | 426 | 1,427 | 510 | 65 |
Prepaid expenses | 52 | 30 | 68 | 16 | 59 |
| 750,762 | 492,166 | 2,356,618 | 373,741 | 141,176 |
Liabilities ($): | | | | | |
Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates—Note 2(c) | 161 | 107 | 423 | 89 | 26 |
Cash overdraft due to Custodian | — | — | 274 | 113 | — |
Payable for shares of Beneficial Interest redeemed | 64 | 5 | 34 | —a | — |
Accrued expenses | 52 | 50 | 67 | 29 | 26 |
| 277 | 162 | 798 | 231 | 52 |
Net Assets ($) | 750,485 | 492,004 | 2,355,820 | 373,510 | 141,124 |
Composition of Net Assets ($): | | | | | |
Paid-in capital | 750,495 | 492,004 | 2,355,823 | 373,510 | 141,122 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) on investments | (10) | —a | (3) | — | 2 |
Net Assets ($) | 750,485 | 492,004 | 2,355,820 | 373,510 | 141,124 |
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | | | |
Instititutional Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | 309,002 | 267,832 | 1,890,054 | 152,690 | 91,003 |
Shares Outstanding | 308,884 | 267,833 | 1,890,056 | 152,685 | 90,979 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Investor Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | 218,649 | 181,542 | 383,917 | 182,657 | 36,650 |
Shares Outstanding | 218,563 | 181,543 | 383,918 | 182,652 | 36,641 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Administrative Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | 199,041 | 28,520 | 71,103 | 1,935 | 7,384 |
Shares Outstanding | 198,963 | 28,521 | 71,103 | 1,935 | 7,381 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Participant Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | 23,778 | 14,109 | 10,746 | 36,227 | 10 |
Shares Outstanding | 23,769 | 14,109 | 10,746 | 36,226 | 10 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Agency Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | 15 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
Shares Outstanding | 15 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | 1.00 | 1.00 | — | 1.00 | — |
Classic Shares | | | | | |
Net Assets ($) | — | — | — | — | 6,077 |
Shares Outstanding | — | — | — | — | 6,075 |
Net Asset Value Per Share ($) | — | — | — | — | 1.00 |
† Investments at cost ($) | 748,881 | 491,256 | 2,355,123 | 373,215 | 140,232 |
|
a Amount represents less than $1,000. | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | | |
54
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(amounts in thousands)
Six Months Ended July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Dreyfus | Dreyfus | Dreyfus | Dreyfus |
| Dreyfus | Government | Government | Treasury & | Treasury |
| Cash | Cash | Prime Cash | Agency Cash | Prime Cash |
| Management | Management | Management | Management | Management |
Investment Income ($): | | | | | |
Interest Income | 40,923 | 13,889 | 2,575 | 12,437 | 10,119 |
Expenses: | | | | | |
Management fee—Note 2(a) | 26,481 | 18,168 | 4,705 | 19,347 | 26,548 |
Service plan fees—Note 2(b) | 6,131 | 3,142 | 1,311 | 4,829 | 11,313 |
Custodian fees—Note 2(c) | 398 | 270 | 92 | 349 | 415 |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 2(c) | 335 | 148 | 66 | 249 | 639 |
Registration fees | 109 | 128 | 77 | 75 | 105 |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 107 | 69 | 29 | 17 | 89 |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 2(d) | 95 | 56 | 15 | 66 | 87 |
Professional fees | 18 | 23 | 24 | 37 | 37 |
Miscellaneous | 213 | 148 | 52 | 159 | 187 |
Total Expenses | 33,887 | 22,152 | 6,371 | 25,128 | 39,420 |
Less—reduction in expenses | | | | | |
due to undertaking—Note 2(a) | (3,644) | (8,639) | (3,796) | (13,645) | (29,304) |
Less—reduction in fees | | | | | |
due to earnings credits—Note 2(c) | —a | —a | (1) | (1) | (1) |
Net Expenses | 30,243 | 13,513 | 2,574 | 11,482 | 10,115 |
Investment Income—Net | 10,680 | 376 | 1 | 955 | 4 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) on | | | | | |
Investments—Note 1(b) ($) | 229 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 22 |
Net Increase in Net Assets | | | | | |
Resulting from Operations | 10,909 | 384 | 6 | 959 | 26 |
|
a Amount represents less than $1,000. | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | | |
The Funds 55
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (continued)
(amounts in thousands)
Six Months Ended July 31, 2012 (Unaudited)
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Dreyfus | Dreyfus |
| Dreyfus | Dreyfus | Dreyfus | California | New York |
| Municipal Cash | New York | Tax Exempt | AMT-Free | AMT-Free |
| Management | Municipal Cash | Cash | Municipal Cash | Municipal Cash |
| Plus | Management | Management | Management | Management |
Investment Income ($): | | | | | |
Interest Income | 993 | 655 | 2,677 | 497 | 206 |
Expenses: | | | | | |
Management fee—Note 2(a) | 771 | 557 | 2,534 | 424 | 151 |
Service plan fees—Note 2(b) | 452 | 311 | 536 | 365 | 73 |
Registration fees | 49 | 20 | 51 | 7 | 43 |
Professional fees | 36 | 38 | 34 | 25 | 23 |
Custodian fees—Note 2(c) | 33 | 23 | 61 | 20 | 9 |
Shareholder servicing costs—Note 2(c) | 7 | 9 | 263 | 3 | 6 |
Prospectus and shareholders’ reports | 5 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 4 |
Trustees’ fees and expenses—Note 2(d) | 3 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 |
Miscellaneous | 31 | 28 | 70 | 13 | 14 |
Total Expenses | 1,387 | 993 | 3,566 | 862 | 324 |
Less—reduction in expenses | | | | | |
due to undertakings—Note 2(a) | (427) | (360) | (907) | (379) | (118) |
Less—reduction in fees due | | | | | |
to earnings credits—Note 2(c) | —a | —a | —a | —a | —a |
Net Expenses | 960 | 633 | 2,659 | 483 | 206 |
Investment Income—Net | 33 | 22 | 18 | 14 | —a |
Net Realized Gain (Loss) on | | | | | |
Investments—Note 1(b) ($) | — | —a | — | — | — |
Net Increase in Net Assets | | | | | |
Resulting from Operations | 33 | 22 | 18 | 14 | —a |
|
a Amount represents less than $1,000. | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | | |
56
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(amounts in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Dreyfus Government |
| Dreyfus Cash Management | Cash Management |
| Six Months Ended | Year Ended | Six Months Ended | Year Ended |
| July 31, 2012 | January 31, | July 31, 2012 | January 31, |
| (Unaudited) | 2012 | (Unaudited) | 2012 |
Operations ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net | 10,680 | 17,381 | 376 | 98 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 229 | 5 | 8 | 41 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | | |
Resulting from Operations | 10,909 | 17,386 | 384 | 139 |
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | (10,610) | (17,442) | (300) | (99) |
Investor Shares | (1) | (7) | (39) | (1) |
Administrative Shares | (31) | (47) | (23) | —a |
Participant Shares | —a | (3) | (5) | —a |
Agency Shares | (38) | (23) | (9) | —a |
Total Dividends | (10,680) | (17,522) | (376) | (100) |
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($1.00 per share): | | | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | 48,412,307 | 109,929,147 | 37,686,315 | 113,164,798 |
Investor Shares | 4,548,285 | 10,284,538 | 3,067,216 | 5,582,368 |
Administrative Shares | 1,135,930 | 2,292,757 | 1,181,118 | 4,552,439 |
Participant Shares | 825,625 | 2,152,712 | 682,180 | 2,294,304 |
Agency Shares | 593,509 | 840,749 | 847,614 | 194,307 |
Net assets received in connection | | | | |
with reorganization—Note 1 | — | 4,064,792 | — | — |
Dividends reinvested: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | 1,587 | 3,200 | 62 | 27 |
Investor Shares | —a | 3 | 28 | —a |
Administrative Shares | 16 | 12 | 19 | —a |
Participant Shares | —a | 2 | 3 | —a |
Agency Shares | 1 | —a | —a | — |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | (49,952,099) | (115,129,031) | (41,769,105) | (115,612,213) |
Investor Shares | (4,107,152) | (10,382,079) | (2,826,163) | (5,776,907) |
Administrative Shares | (1,306,014) | (2,516,455) | (1,290,699) | (4,540,881) |
Participant Shares | (857,982) | (2,115,132) | (727,271) | (2,535,843) |
Agency Shares | (622,925) | (714,801) | (583,230) | (239,102) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | | | | |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | (1,328,912) | (1,289,586) | (3,731,913) | (2,916,703) |
Total Increase (Decrease) In Net Assets | (1,328,683) | (1,289,722) | (3,731,905) | (2,916,664) |
Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Beginning of Period | 27,639,264 | 28,928,986 | 21,069,227 | 23,985,891 |
End of Period | 26,310,581 | 27,639,264 | 17,337,322 | 21,069,227 |
Accumulated distributions in excess of | | | | |
investment income—net | (2) | (2) | — | — |
|
a Amount represents less than $1,000. | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | |
The Funds 57
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
(amounts in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| Dreyfus Government | Dreyfus Treasury & |
| Prime Cash Management | Agency Cash Management |
| Six Months Ended | Year Ended | Six Months Ended | Year Ended |
| July 31, 2012 | January 31, | July 31, 2012 | January 31, |
| (Unaudited) | 2012 | (Unaudited) | 2012 |
Operations ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net | 1 | 1 | 955 | 1,355 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 5 | (48) | 4 | 192 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | | |
Resulting from Operations | 6 | (47) | 959 | 1,547 |
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | (1) | (1) | (773) | (1,223) |
Investor Shares | —a | —a | (109) | (199) |
Administrative Shares | —a | —a | (29) | (51) |
Participant Shares | —a | —a | (39) | (59) |
Service Shares | — | — | (1) | (1) |
Select Shares | — | — | (1) | (2) |
Agency Shares | —a | —a | (2) | (3) |
Premier Shares | — | — | (1) | (4) |
Total Dividends | (1) | (1) | (955) | (1,542) |
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($1.00 per share): | | | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | 4,593,565 | 12,249,844 | 30,871,326 | 69,411,956 |
Investor Shares | 610,686 | 1,309,992 | 4,161,263 | 9,318,248 |
Administrative Shares | 1,938,940 | 4,394,882 | 946,347 | 2,103,860 |
Participant Shares | 184,515 | 688,559 | 1,791,834 | 3,087,091 |
Service Shares | — | — | 3,489 | 36,339 |
Select Shares | — | — | 12,126 | 46,006 |
Agency Shares | 45,098 | 106,658 | 53,744 | 37,483 |
Premier Shares | — | — | 175,989 | 384,613 |
Dividends reinvested: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | —a | —a | 241 | 342 |
Investor Shares | —a | —a | 28 | 38 |
Administrative Shares | —a | —a | 19 | 29 |
Participant Shares | —a | —a | 26 | 32 |
Service Shares | — | — | —a | —a |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | (5,019,075) | (11,498,089) | (32,770,883) | (60,809,846) |
Investor Shares | (640,117) | (1,384,843) | (4,243,951) | (8,965,283) |
Administrative Shares | (1,885,625) | (4,323,871) | (969,206) | (1,924,122) |
Participant Shares | (204,756) | (939,334) | (1,876,816) | (2,616,381) |
Service Shares | — | — | (11,557) | (9,591) |
Select Shares | — | — | (29,471) | (41,310) |
Agency Shares | (11,173) | (150,808) | (41,546) | (52,966) |
Premier Shares | — | — | (182,658) | (405,988) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | | | | |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | (387,942) | 452,990 | (2,109,656) | 9,600,550 |
Total Increase (Decrease) In Net Assets | (387,937) | 452,942 | (2,109,652) | 9,600,555 |
Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Beginning of Period | 4,894,942 | 4,442,000 | 20,322,875 | 10,722,320 |
End of Period | 4,507,005 | 4,894,942 | 18,213,223 | 20,322,875 |
|
a Amount represents less than $1,000. | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | |
58
| | | | | | | | |
| Dreyfus Treasury | Dreyfus Municipal |
| Prime Cash Management | Cash Management Plus |
| Six Months Ended | Year Ended | Six Months Ended | | Year Ended |
| July 31, 2012 | January 31, | July 31, 2012 | | January 31, |
| (Unaudited) | 2012 | (Unaudited) | | 2012 |
Operations ($): | | | | | |
Investment income—net | 4 | 8 | 33 | | 116 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | 22 | (251) | — | | — |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | | | |
Resulting from Operations | 26 | (243) | 33 | | 116 |
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | | | | |
Investment income—net: | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | (3) | (46) | (33 | ) | (100) |
Investor Shares | (1) | (10) | —a | | —a |
Administrative Shares | —a | (3) | —a | | (16) |
Participant Shares | —a | (7) | —a | | —a |
Agency Shares | —a | —a | —a | | —a |
Total Dividends | (4) | (66) | (33 | ) | (116) |
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($1.00 per share): | | | | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | 27,117,780 | 64,662,447 | 743,951 | | 1,287,413 |
Investor Shares | 7,829,857 | 16,084,217 | 153,436 | | 428,316 |
Administrative Shares | 1,263,960 | 3,489,224 | 182,371 | | 709,023 |
Participant Shares | 6,023,691 | 12,420,251 | 25,228 | | 44,217 |
Agency Shares | 121,064 | 156,869 | — | | —a |
Dividends reinvested: | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | 1 | 12 | 14 | | 66 |
Investor Shares | —a | 5 | —a | | —a |
Administrative Shares | —a | 1 | —a | | 15 |
Participant Shares | —a | 5 | —a | | —a |
Agency Shares | —a | —a | —a | | —a |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | (24,771,011) | (60,789,778) | (781,448 | ) | (1,303,879) |
Investor Shares | (7,916,367) | (15,148,673) | (191,787 | ) | (430,017) |
Administrative Shares | (1,076,603) | (3,933,307) | (196,263 | ) | (872,745) |
Participant Shares | (5,838,188) | (11,717,225) | (26,440 | ) | (41,746) |
Agency Shares | (84,681) | (157,506) | —a | | — |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | | | | | |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | 2,669,503 | 5,066,542 | (90,938 | ) | (179,337) |
Total Increase (Decrease) In Net Assets | 2,669,525 | 5,066,233 | (90,938 | ) | (179,337) |
Net Assets ($): | | | | | |
Beginning of Period | 26,535,415 | 21,469,182 | 841,423 | | 1,020,760 |
End of Period | 29,204,940 | 26,535,415 | 750,485 | | 841,423 |
|
a Amount represents less than $1,000. | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | | |
The Funds 59
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (continued)
(amounts in thousands)
| | | | | | | | |
| Dreyfus New York | Dreyfus Tax Exempt |
| Municipal Cash Management | Cash Management |
| Six Months Ended | Year Ended | Six Months Ended | Year Ended |
| July 31, 2012 | January 31, | July 31, 2012 | January 31, |
| (Unaudited) | 2012 | (Unaudited) | 2012 |
Operations ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net | 22 | 152 | 18 | 680 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | —a | — | — | 8 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | | |
Resulting from Operations | 22 | 152 | 18 | 688 |
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | | | |
Investment income—net: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | (22) | (152) | (18) | (687) |
Investor Shares | —a | (1) | —a | (2) |
Administrative Shares | —a | (2) | —a | (2) |
Participant Shares | —a | —a | —a | —a |
Agency Shares | — | — | — | —a,b |
Total Dividends | (22) | (155) | (18) | (691) |
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($1.00 per share): | | | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | 191,493 | 546,920 | 4,029,896 | 8,627,380 |
Investor Shares | 239,936 | 431,943 | 338,453 | 529,699 |
Administrative Shares | 27,949 | 28,998 | 34,433 | 105,246 |
Participant Shares | 30,745 | 39,049 | 27,141 | 87,588 |
Agency Shares | — | — | — | 417b |
Dividends reinvested: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | 3 | 39 | 6 | 262 |
Investor Shares | —a | 1 | —a | 1 |
Administrative Shares | —a | 2 | —a | 2 |
Participant Shares | —a | —a | — | —a |
Agency Shares | — | — | — | —b |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | | | |
Institutional Shares | (243,942) | (686,027) | (4,221,628) | (9,376,532) |
Investor Shares | (324,985) | (464,579) | (334,095) | (494,321) |
Administrative Shares | (20,870) | (54,912) | (38,996) | (102,001) |
Participant Shares | (27,247) | (50,235) | (43,661) | (69,254) |
Agency Shares | — | — | — | (461)b |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | | | | |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | (126,918) | (208,801) | (208,451) | (691,974) |
Total Increase (Decrease) In Net Assets | (126,918) | (208,804) | (208,451) | (691,977) |
Net Assets ($): | | | | |
Beginning of Period | 618,922 | 827,726 | 2,564,271 | 3,256,248 |
End of Period | 492,004 | 618,922 | 2,355,820 | 2,564,271 |
|
a Amount represents less than $1,000. |
b Effective December 8, 2011, Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management had terminated its Agency Shares. |
See notes to financial statements.
60
| | | | | | | | |
| Dreyfus California AMT-Free | Dreyfus New York AMT-Free |
| Municipal Cash Management | Municipal Cash Management |
| Six Months Ended | Year Ended | Six Months Ended | | Year Ended |
| July 31, 2012 | January 31, | July 31, 2012 | | January 31, |
| (Unaudited) | 2012 | (Unaudited) | | 2012 |
Operations ($): | | | | | |
Investment income—net | 14 | 97 | —a | | 16 |
Net realized gain (loss) on investments | — | 1 | — | | 2 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | | | | |
Resulting from Operations | 14 | 98 | —a | | 18 |
Dividends to Shareholders from ($): | | | | | |
Investment income—net: | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | (14) | (97) | —a | | (16) |
Investor Shares | —a | —a | —a | | —a |
Administrative Shares | — | (1) | —a | | —a |
Participant Shares | —a | —a | — | | —a |
Agency Shares | —a | —a | — | | — |
Classic Shares | — | — | —a | | —a |
Total Dividends | (14) | (98) | —a | | (16) |
Beneficial Interest Transactions ($1.00 per share): | | | | | |
Net proceeds from shares sold: | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | 68,570 | 271,328 | 67,533 | | 181,955 |
Investor Shares | 346,155 | 518,998 | 76,687 | | 165,569 |
Administrative Shares | 12,190 | 23,002 | 7,323 | | 21,288 |
Participant Shares | 59,404 | 140,330 | — | | — |
Classic Shares | — | — | 55,906 | | 118,607 |
Dividends reinvested: | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | 13 | 88 | —a | | 12 |
Investor Shares | —a | —a | —a | | —a |
Administrative Shares | —a | 1 | —a | | —a |
Participant Shares | —a | —a | — | | — |
Classic Shares | — | — | —a | | —a |
Cost of shares redeemed: | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | (90,055) | (232,587) | (78,759 | ) | (160,271) |
Investor Shares | (366,956) | (371,657) | (88,677 | ) | (167,059) |
Administrative Shares | (12,234) | (34,592) | (12,614 | ) | (16,575) |
Participant Shares | (84,827) | (126,459) | — | | — |
Agency Shares | — | — | — | | — |
Classic Shares | — | — | (50,102 | ) | (127,569) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets from | | | | | |
Beneficial Interest Transactions | (67,740) | 188,452 | (22,703 | ) | 15,957 |
Total Increase (Decrease) In Net Assets | (67,740) | 188,452 | (22,703 | ) | 15,959 |
Net Assets ($): | | | | | |
Beginning of Period | 441,250 | 252,798 | 163,827 | | 147,868 |
End of Period | 373,510 | 441,250 | 141,124 | | 163,827 |
|
a Amount represents less than $1,000. | | | | | |
See notes to financial statements. | | | | | |
The Funds 61
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (Unaudited)
The following tables describe the performance for each share class of each fund for the fiscal periods indicated.All information reflects financial results for a single fund share.Total return shows how much your investment in each fund would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions.These figures have been derived from the funds’ financial statements. Please note that the financial highlights information in the following tables for Dreyfus NewYork AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management’s Institutional, Investor and Classic shares represents the financial highlights of Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management’s predecessor, BNY Hamilton New York AMT-Free Municipal Money Fund (“New York AMT-Free Municipal Money Fund”), before Dreyfus NewYork AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management commenced operations as of the close of business on September 12, 2008, and represents the performance of Dreyfus NewYork AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management’s Institutional, Investor and Classic shares thereafter. Before Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management commenced operations, all of the assets of the New York AMT-Free Municipal Money Fund were transferred to Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management in exchange for Institutional, Investor and Classic shares of the fund in a tax-free reorganization.Total return shows how much your investment in Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management would have increased (or decreased) during each period, assuming you had reinvested all dividends and distributions. These figures have been derived from Dreyfus NewYork AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management’s predecessor’s financial statements.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Per Share Data ($) | | Ratios/Supplemental Data (%) | |
| | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | |
| Net Asset | | Dividends | Net Asset | | Ratio of | Ratio of | Investment | Net Assets |
| Value | Net | from Net | Value | | Total Expenses | Net Expenses | Income to | End of |
| Beginning | Investment | Investment | End | Total | to Average | to Average | Average | Period |
| of Period | Income | Income | of Period | Return (%) | Net Assets | Net Assets | Net Assets | ($ x1,000,000) |
|
Dreyfus Cash Management | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .10b | .21b | .21b | .10b | 21,157 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .07 | .21 | .19 | .07 | 22,695 |
2011 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .15 | .21 | .21 | .14 | 24,512 |
2010 | 1.00 | .004 | (.004) | 1.00 | .41 | .22 | .22 | .40 | 34,291 |
2009 | 1.00 | .026 | (.026) | 1.00 | 2.65 | .21 | .21 | 2.56 | 31,821 |
2008 | 1.00 | .051 | (.051) | 1.00 | 5.18 | .20 | .20 | 5.03 | 18,983 |
Investor Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .46b | .31b | .00b,c | 3,432 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .46 | .26 | .00c | 2,991 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .46 | .35 | .00c | 2,949 |
2010 | 1.00 | .002 | (.002) | 1.00 | .21 | .47 | .43 | .23 | 3,457 |
2009 | 1.00 | .024 | (.024) | 1.00 | 2.40 | .47 | .47 | 2.30 | 4,893 |
2008 | 1.00 | .048 | (.048) | 1.00 | 4.92 | .45 | .45 | 4.78 | 3,194 |
Administrative Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .31b | .30b | .01b | 771 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .31 | .25 | .00c | 941 |
2011 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .05 | .31 | .30 | .05 | 792 |
2010 | 1.00 | .003 | (.003) | 1.00 | .32 | .32 | .32 | .31 | 1,113 |
2009 | 1.00 | .025 | (.025) | 1.00 | 2.55 | .31 | .31 | 2.46 | 1,176 |
2008 | 1.00 | .050 | (.050) | 1.00 | 5.08 | .30 | .30 | 4.93 | 638 |
Participant Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .61b | .31b | .00b,c | 794 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .61 | .25 | .00c | 826 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .61 | .36 | .00c | 616 |
2010 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .14 | .63 | .52 | .15 | 591 |
2009 | 1.00 | .022 | (.022) | 1.00 | 2.24 | .62 | .62 | 2.15 | 1,052 |
2008 | 1.00 | .047 | (.047) | 1.00 | 4.77 | .60 | .60 | 4.63 | 390 |
Agency Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .04b | .27b | .27b | .03b | 157 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02 | .27 | .23 | .01 | 186 |
2011 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .09 | .27 | .27 | .09 | 60 |
2010 | 1.00 | .004 | (.004) | 1.00 | .35 | .29 | .28 | .42 | 90 |
2009 | 1.00 | .026 | (.026) | 1.00 | 2.59 | .28 | .28 | 2.49 | 99 |
2008d | 1.00 | .016 | (.016) | 1.00 | 4.84b | .26b | .26b | 4.97b | 19 |
| |
a | Amount represents less than $.001 per share. |
b | Annualized. |
c | Amount represents less than .01%. |
d | From October 1, 2007 (commencement of initial offering) to January 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements.
62
| Per Share Data ($) | | Ratios/Supplemental Data (%) | |
| | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | |
| Net Asset | | Dividends | Net Asset | | Ratio of | Ratio of | Investment | Net Assets |
| Value | Net | from Net | Value | | Total Expenses | Net Expenses | Income to | End of |
| Beginning | Investment | Investment | End | Total | to Average | to Average | Average | Period |
| of Period | Income | Income | of Period | Return (%) | Net Assets | Net Assets | Net Assets | ($ x1,000,000) |
|
Dreyfus Government | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .21b | .15b | .00b,c | 13,999 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .21 | .13 | .00c | 18,082 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .04 | .21 | .21 | .04 | 20,529 |
2010 | 1.00 | .002 | (.002) | 1.00 | .17 | .22 | .21 | .18 | 23,963 |
2009 | 1.00 | .020 | (.020) | 1.00 | 2.01 | .22 | .22 | 1.63 | 33,715 |
2008 | 1.00 | .048 | (.048) | 1.00 | 4.93 | .20 | .20 | 4.73 | 9,303 |
Investor Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .46b | .15b | .00b,c | 1,751 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .46 | .13 | .00c | 1,510 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .46 | .25 | .00c | 1,705 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .03 | .46 | .37 | .04 | 2,209 |
2009 | 1.00 | .017 | (.017) | 1.00 | 1.76 | .46 | .46 | 1.39 | 4,058 |
2008 | 1.00 | .046 | (.046) | 1.00 | 4.67 | .45 | .45 | 4.48 | 1,738 |
Administrative Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .31b | .15b | .00b,c | 993 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .31 | .14 | .00c | 1,103 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .31 | .25 | .00c | 1,091 |
2010 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .10 | .32 | .29 | .13 | 829 |
2009 | 1.00 | .019 | (.019) | 1.00 | 1.91 | .31 | .31 | 1.54 | 2,258 |
2008 | 1.00 | .047 | (.047) | 1.00 | 4.83 | .30 | .30 | 4.63 | 693 |
Participant Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .61b | .15b | .00b,c | 244 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .61 | .14 | .00c | 289 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .61 | .25 | .00c | 531 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .62 | .41 | .01 | 339 |
2009 | 1.00 | .016 | (.016) | 1.00 | 1.60 | .61 | .61 | 1.24 | 662 |
2008 | 1.00 | .044 | (.044) | 1.00 | 4.51 | .60 | .60 | 4.33 | 445 |
Agency Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .28b | .15b | .00b,c | 350 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .27 | .14 | .00c | 86 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .28 | .25 | .00c | 130 |
2010 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .13 | .27 | .26 | .13 | 73 |
2009 | 1.00 | .019 | (.019) | 1.00 | 1.96 | .27 | .27 | 1.58 | 86 |
2008d | 1.00 | .014 | (.014) | 1.00 | 4.30b | .26b | .26b | 4.67b | 2 |
| |
a | Amount represents less than $.001 per share. |
b | Annualized. |
c | Amount represents less than .01%. |
d | From October 1, 2007 (commencement of initial offering) to January 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements.
The Funds 63
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| Per Share Data ($) | | Ratios/Supplemental Data (%) | |
| | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | |
| Net Asset | | Dividends | Net Asset | | Ratio of | Ratio of | Investment | Net Assets |
| Value | Net | from Net | Value | | Total Expenses | Net Expenses | Income to | End of |
| Beginning | Investment | Investment | End | Total | to Average | to Average | Average | Period |
| of Period | Income | Income | of Period | Return (%) | Net Assets | Net Assets | Net Assets | ($ x1,000,000) |
|
Dreyfus Government Prime | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .21b | .11b | .00b,c | 3,118 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .22 | .11 | .00c | 3,543 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .22 | .20 | .01 | 2,792 |
2010 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .11 | .23 | .21 | .12 | 3,147 |
2009 | 1.00 | .019 | (.019) | 1.00 | 1.91 | .22 | .22 | 1.64 | 6,439 |
2008 | 1.00 | .048 | (.048) | 1.00 | 4.91 | .20 | .20 | 4.67 | 2,327 |
Investor Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .47b | .11b | .00b,c | 453 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .47 | .12 | .00c | 482 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .47 | .22 | .00c | 557 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .48 | .33 | .00c | 593 |
2009 | 1.00 | .016 | (.016) | 1.00 | 1.66 | .47 | .47 | 1.39 | 1,178 |
2008 | 1.00 | .046 | (.046) | 1.00 | 4.65 | .45 | .45 | 4.42 | 563 |
Administrative Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .32b | .11b | .00b,c | 686 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .32 | .12 | .00c | 632 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .32 | .22 | .00c | 561 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .04 | .33 | .29 | .04 | 497 |
2009 | 1.00 | .018 | (.018) | 1.00 | 1.81 | .32 | .32 | 1.54 | 693 |
2008 | 1.00 | .047 | (.047) | 1.00 | 4.80 | .30 | .30 | 4.57 | 307 |
Participant Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .61b | .11b | .00b,c | 205 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .61 | .13 | .00c | 226 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .62 | .22 | .00c | 476 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .62 | .33 | .00c | 706 |
2009 | 1.00 | .015 | (.015) | 1.00 | 1.51 | .62 | .61 | 1.25 | 1,346 |
2008 | 1.00 | .044 | (.044) | 1.00 | 4.49 | .60 | .60 | 4.27 | 711 |
Agency Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .27b | .12b | .00b,c | 45 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .27 | .13 | .00c | 12 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .28 | .21 | .00c | 56 |
2010 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .06 | .29 | .26 | .06 | 90 |
2009 | 1.00 | .018 | (.018) | 1.00 | 1.85 | .28 | .28 | 1.58 | 41 |
2008d | 1.00 | .015 | (.015) | 1.00 | 4.33b | .26b | .26b | 4.61b | 10 |
| |
a | Amount represents less than $.001 per share. |
b | Annualized. |
c | Amount represents less than .01%. |
d | From October 1, 2007 (commencement of initial offering) to January 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements.
64
| Per Share Data ($) | | Ratios/Supplemental Data (%) | |
| | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | |
| Net Asset | | Dividends | Net Asset | | Ratio of | Ratio of | Investment | Net Assets |
| Value | Net | from Net | Value | | Total Expenses | Net Expenses | Income to | End of |
| Beginning | Investment | Investment | End | Total | to Average | to Average | Average | Period |
| of Period | Income | Income | of Period | Return (%) | Net Assets | Net Assets | Net Assets | ($ x1,000,000) |
|
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02b | .21b | .12b | .01b | 14,647 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .21 | .09 | .01 | 16,547 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .22 | .20 | .01 | 7,944 |
2010 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .07 | .22 | .21 | .08 | 12,015 |
2009 | 1.00 | .013 | (.013) | 1.00 | 1.27 | .22 | .22 | 1.09 | 16,461 |
2008 | 1.00 | .046 | (.046) | 1.00 | 4.71 | .20 | .20 | 4.30 | 12,891 |
Investor Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02b | .46b | .12b | .01b | 2,093 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .46 | .09 | .01 | 2,176 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .46 | .20 | .00c | 1,823 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .47 | .29 | .00c | 1,922 |
2009 | 1.00 | .010 | (.010) | 1.00 | 1.04 | .47 | .45 | .86 | 3,317 |
2008 | 1.00 | .044 | (.044) | 1.00 | 4.45 | .45 | .45 | 4.05 | 3,483 |
Administrative Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02b | .31b | .12b | .01b | 579 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .31 | .09 | .01 | 602 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .31 | .20 | .00c | 422 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02 | .33 | .27 | .03 | 695 |
2009 | 1.00 | .012 | (.012) | 1.00 | 1.17 | .31 | .31 | 1.00 | 1,355 |
2008 | 1.00 | .045 | (.045) | 1.00 | 4.61 | .30 | .30 | 4.20 | 758 |
Participant Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02b | .61b | .11b | .01b | 804 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .61 | .09 | .01 | 889 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .61 | .20 | .00c | 418 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .62 | .28 | .00c | 520 |
2009 | 1.00 | .009 | (.009) | 1.00 | .93 | .62 | .54 | .77 | 444 |
2008 | 1.00 | .042 | (.042) | 1.00 | 4.30 | .60 | .60 | 3.90 | 288 |
Service Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02b | .71b | .10b | .01b | 24 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .73 | .10 | .01 | 32 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .71 | .21 | .00c | 5 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .72 | .28 | .00c | 5 |
2009 | 1.00 | .009 | (.009) | 1.00 | .86 | .71 | .66 | .65 | 5 |
2008d | 1.00 | .023 | (.023) | 1.00 | 3.15b | .70b | .70b | 3.80b | 56 |
Select Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02b | 1.01b | .11b | .01b | 6 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | 1.01 | .09 | .01 | 24 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | 1.01 | .20 | .00c | 19 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | 1.02 | .28 | .00c | 25 |
2009 | 1.00 | .007 | (.007) | 1.00 | .66 | 1.01 | .87 | .44 | 33 |
2008d | 1.00 | .021 | (.021) | 1.00 | 2.89b | 1.00b | 1.00b | 3.50b | 94 |
Agency Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02b | .27b | .12b | .01b | 35 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .27 | .10 | .01 | 23 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .27 | .20 | .00c | 38 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .03 | .28 | .24 | .03 | 71 |
2009 | 1.00 | .012 | (.012) | 1.00 | 1.21 | .27 | .27 | 1.04 | 63 |
2008e | 1.00 | .013 | (.013) | 1.00 | 3.92b | .26b | .26b | 4.24b | —f |
Premier Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02b | .52b | .12b | .01b | 24 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .52 | .10 | .01 | 31 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .52 | .20 | .00c | 52 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .53 | .27 | .00c | 61 |
2009 | 1.00 | .010 | (.010) | 1.00 | 1.00 | .53 | .48 | .83 | 35 |
2008e | 1.00 | .012 | (.012) | 1.00 | 3.68b | .51b | .51b | 3.99b | 29 |
| |
a | Amount represents less than $.001 per share. |
b | Annualized. |
c | Amount represents less than .01%. |
d | From June 29, 2007 (commencement of initial offering) to January 31, 2008. |
e | From October 1, 2007 (commencement of initial offering) to January 31, 2008. |
f | Amount represents less than $1 million. |
See notes to financial statements.
The Funds 65
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| Per Share Data ($) | | Ratios/Supplemental Data (%) | |
| | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | |
| Net Asset | | Dividends | Net Asset | | Ratio of | Ratio of | Investment | Net Assets |
| Value | Net | from Net | Value | | Total Expenses | Net Expenses | Income to | End of |
| Beginning | Investment | Investment | End | Total | to Average | to Average | Average | Period |
| of Period | Income | Income | of Period | Return (%) | Net Assets | Net Assets | Net Assets | ($ x1,000,000) |
|
Dreyfus Treasury | | | | | | | | | |
Prime Cash Management | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .21b | .08b | .00b,c | 21,235 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .22 | .06 | .00c | 18,888 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .21 | .14 | .00c | 15,016 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02 | .22 | .19 | .03 | 18,751 |
2009 | 1.00 | .012 | (.012) | 1.00 | 1.24 | .22 | .22 | .78 | 30,587 |
2008 | 1.00 | .042 | (.042) | 1.00 | 4.28 | .20 | .20 | 3.81 | 5,373 |
Investor Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .46b | .08b | .00b,c | 4,064 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .46 | .06 | .00c | 4,150 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .46 | .14 | .00c | 3,215 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .47 | .22 | .00c | 4,222 |
2009 | 1.00 | .010 | (.010) | 1.00 | 1.01 | .46 | .44 | .56 | 7,522 |
2008 | 1.00 | .039 | (.039) | 1.00 | 4.02 | .45 | .45 | 3.56 | 2,573 |
Administrative Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .31b | .08b | .00b,c | 797 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .31 | .08 | .00c | 610 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .31 | .14 | .00c | 1,054 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .32 | .21 | .00c | 1,272 |
2009 | 1.00 | .011 | (.011) | 1.00 | 1.15 | .32 | .31 | .69 | 2,526 |
2008 | 1.00 | .041 | (.041) | 1.00 | 4.18 | .30 | .30 | 3.71 | 438 |
Participant Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .61b | .08b | .00b,c | 3,052 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .61 | .06 | .00c | 2,866 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .61 | .15 | .00c | 2,163 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .62 | .22 | .00c | 2,599 |
2009 | 1.00 | .009 | (.009) | 1.00 | .89 | .62 | .53 | .47 | 5,437 |
2008 | 1.00 | .038 | (.038) | 1.00 | 3.87 | .60 | .60 | 3.41 | 975 |
Agency Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .27b | .09b | .00b,c | 57 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .26 | .05 | .00c | 21 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .27 | .11 | .00c | 21 |
2010 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .28 | .19 | .01 | 381 |
2009 | 1.00 | .012 | (.012) | 1.00 | 1.18 | .27 | .27 | .73 | 409 |
2008d | 1.00 | .011 | (.011) | 1.00 | 3.38b | .26b | .26b | 3.75b | —e |
| |
a | Amount represents less than $.001 per share. |
b | Annualized. |
c | Amount represents less than .01%. |
d | From October 1, 2007 (commencement of initial offering) to January 31, 2008. |
e | Amount represents less than $1 million. |
See notes to financial statements.
66
| Per Share Data ($) | | Ratios/Supplemental Data (%) | |
| | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | |
| Net Asset | | Dividends | Net Asset | | Ratio of | Ratio of | Investment | Net Assets |
| Value | Net | from Net | Value | | Total Expenses | Net Expenses | Income to | End of |
| Beginning | Investment | Investment | End | Total | to Average | to Average | Average | Period |
| of Period | Income | Income | of Period | Return (%) | Net Assets | Net Assets | Net Assets | ($ x1,000,000) |
|
Dreyfus Municipal | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management Plus | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02b | .24b | .24b | .02b | 309 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .03 | .24 | .22 | .03 | 346 |
2011 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .13 | .24 | .24 | .13 | 363 |
2010 | 1.00 | .005 | (.005) | 1.00 | .49 | .25 | .23 | .50 | 360 |
2009 | 1.00 | .021 | (.021) | 1.00 | 2.17 | .21 | .21 | 2.14 | 589 |
2008 | 1.00 | .034 | (.034) | 1.00 | 3.50 | .20 | .20 | 3.42 | 1,787 |
Investor Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .49b | .26b | .00b,c | 219 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .49 | .25 | .00c | 257 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .48 | .37 | .00c | 259 |
2010 | 1.00 | .003 | (.003) | 1.00 | .27 | .50 | .44 | .29 | 401 |
2009 | 1.00 | .019 | (.019) | 1.00 | 1.91 | .46 | .46 | 1.89 | 293 |
2008 | 1.00 | .032 | (.032) | 1.00 | 3.25 | .45 | .45 | 3.17 | 472 |
Administrative Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .34b | .26b | .00b,c | 199 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .34 | .26 | .00c | 213 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .04 | .33 | .33 | .04 | 377 |
2010 | 1.00 | .004 | (.004) | 1.00 | .39 | .35 | .32 | .41 | 582 |
2009 | 1.00 | .020 | (.020) | 1.00 | 2.07 | .31 | .31 | 2.04 | 625 |
2008 | 1.00 | .033 | (.033) | 1.00 | 3.40 | .30 | .30 | 3.32 | 294 |
Participant Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .64b | .26b | .00b,c | 24 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .64 | .25 | .00c | 25 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .63 | .37 | .00c | 23 |
2010 | 1.00 | .002 | (.002) | 1.00 | .18 | .65 | .56 | .17 | 23 |
2009 | 1.00 | .017 | (.017) | 1.00 | 1.76 | .61 | .61 | 1.74 | 61 |
2008 | 1.00 | .030 | (.030) | 1.00 | 3.09 | .60 | .60 | 3.02 | 37 |
Agency Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .30b | .26b | .00b,c | —d |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .30 | .24 | .01 | —d |
2011 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .06 | .30 | .30 | .06 | —d |
2010 | 1.00 | .004 | (.004) | 1.00 | .42 | .32 | .29 | .44 | 1 |
2009 | 1.00 | .021 | (.021) | 1.00 | 2.10 | .27 | .27 | 2.08 | —d |
2008e | 1.00 | .011 | (.011) | 1.00 | 3.20b | .26b | .26b | 3.36b | —d |
| |
a | Amount represents less than $.001 per share. |
b | Annualized. |
c | Amount represents less than .01%. |
d | Amount represents less than $1 million. |
e | From October 1, 2007 (commencement of initial offering) to January 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements.
The Funds 67
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| Per Share Data ($) | | Ratios/Supplemental Data (%) | |
| | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | |
| Net Asset | | Dividends | Net Asset | | Ratio of | Ratio of | Investment | Net Assets |
| Value | Net | from Net | Value | | Total Expenses | Net Expenses | Income to | End of |
| Beginning | Investment | Investment | End | Total | to Average | to Average | Average | Period |
| of Period | Income | Income | of Period | Return (%) | Net Assets | Net Assets | Net Assets | ($ x1,000,000) |
|
Dreyfus New York Municipal | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02b | .25b | .22b | .01b | 268 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .03 | .24 | .21 | .04 | 320 |
2011 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .13 | .24 | .24 | .12 | 459 |
2010 | 1.00 | .004 | (.004) | 1.00 | .45 | .25 | .23 | .44 | 589 |
2009 | 1.00 | .020 | (.020) | 1.00 | 1.99 | .22 | .22 | 1.95 | 544 |
2008 | 1.00 | .034 | (.034) | 1.00 | 3.47 | .20 | .20 | 3.41 | 458 |
Investor Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .49b | .23b | .00b,c | 182 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .49 | .25 | .00c | 267 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .48 | .36 | .00c | 299 |
2010 | 1.00 | .002 | (.002) | 1.00 | .23 | .50 | .45 | .22 | 282 |
2009 | 1.00 | .017 | (.017) | 1.00 | 1.74 | .47 | .47 | 1.70 | 374 |
2008 | 1.00 | .032 | (.032) | 1.00 | 3.21 | .45 | .45 | 3.16 | 363 |
Administrative Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .34b | .24b | .00b,c | 29 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .34 | .25 | .00c | 21 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .03 | .34 | .33 | .03 | 47 |
2010 | 1.00 | .004 | (.004) | 1.00 | .35 | .35 | .33 | .34 | 70 |
2009 | 1.00 | .019 | (.019) | 1.00 | 1.89 | .32 | .32 | 1.85 | 62 |
2008 | 1.00 | .033 | (.033) | 1.00 | 3.37 | .30 | .30 | 3.31 | 74 |
Participant Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .65b | .24b | .00b,c | 14 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .64 | .25 | .00c | 11 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .64 | .36 | .00c | 22 |
2010 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .15 | .65 | .57 | .10 | 12 |
2009 | 1.00 | .016 | (.016) | 1.00 | 1.59 | .62 | .62 | 1.55 | 51 |
2008 | 1.00 | .030 | (.030) | 1.00 | 3.06 | .60 | .60 | 3.01 | 47 |
Agency Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .31b | .24b | .00b,c | —d |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .30 | .23 | .00c | —d |
2011 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .07 | .30 | .30 | .03 | —d |
2010 | 1.00 | .004 | (.004) | 1.00 | .39 | .31 | .29 | .38 | —d |
2009 | 1.00 | .019 | (.019) | 1.00 | 1.93 | .28 | .28 | 1.89 | —d |
2008e | 1.00 | .011 | (.011) | 1.00 | 3.18b | .26b | .26b | 3.35b | —d |
| |
a | Amount represents less than $.001 per share. |
b | Annualized. |
c | Amount represents less than .01%. |
d | Amount represents less than $1 million. |
e | From October 1, 2007 (commencement of initial offering) to January 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements.
68
| Per Share Data ($) | | Ratios/Supplemental Data (%) | |
| | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | |
| Net Asset | | Dividends | Net Asset | | Ratio of | Ratio of | Investment | Net Assets |
| Value | Net | from Net | Value | | Total Expenses | Net Expenses | Income to | End of |
| Beginning | Investment | Investment | End | Total | to Average | to Average | Average | Period |
| of Period | Income | Income | of Period | Return (%) | Net Assets | Net Assets | Net Assets | ($ x1,000,000) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .24b | .21b | .00b,c | 1,890 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .03 | .24 | .20 | .03 | 2,082 |
2011 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .10 | .23 | .23 | .09 | 2,831 |
2010 | 1.00 | .004 | (.004) | 1.00 | .37 | .24 | .23 | .40 | 3,383 |
2009 | 1.00 | .021 | (.021) | 1.00 | 2.11 | .21 | .21 | 2.06 | 5,191 |
2008 | 1.00 | .034 | (.034) | 1.00 | 3.47 | .20 | .20 | 3.39 | 4,370 |
Investor Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .47b | .21b | .00b,c | 384 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .47 | .22 | .00c | 380 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .47 | .32 | .00c | 344 |
2010 | 1.00 | .002 | (.002) | 1.00 | .19 | .49 | .42 | .21 | 354 |
2009 | 1.00 | .018 | (.018) | 1.00 | 1.86 | .46 | .46 | 1.81 | 565 |
2008 | 1.00 | .032 | (.032) | 1.00 | 3.21 | .45 | .45 | 3.14 | 556 |
Administrative Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .32b | .21b | .00b,c | 71 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .32 | .22 | .00c | 76 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02 | .32 | .31 | .01 | 72 |
2010 | 1.00 | .003 | (.003) | 1.00 | .28 | .34 | .32 | .31 | 120 |
2009 | 1.00 | .020 | (.020) | 1.00 | 2.01 | .31 | .31 | 1.96 | 645 |
2008 | 1.00 | .033 | (.033) | 1.00 | 3.36 | .30 | .30 | 3.29 | 259 |
Participant Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,c | .62b | .21b | .00b,c | 11 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00c | .62 | .21 | .00c | 27 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .62 | .32 | .00c | 9 |
2010 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .12 | .64 | .53 | .10 | 27 |
2009 | 1.00 | .017 | (.017) | 1.00 | 1.70 | .61 | .61 | 1.66 | 134 |
2008 | 1.00 | .030 | (.030) | 1.00 | 3.06 | .60 | .60 | 2.99 | 55 |
| |
a | Amount represents less than $.001 per share. |
b | Annualized. |
c | Amount represents less than .01%. |
See notes to financial statements.
The Funds 69
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Per Share Data ($) | | Ratios/Supplemental Data (%) | |
| | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | |
| Net Asset | | Dividends | Net Asset | | Ratio of | Ratio of | Investment | Net Assets |
| Value | Net | from Net | Value | | Total Expenses | Net Expenses | Income to | End of |
| Beginning | Investment | Investment | End | Total | to Average | to Average | Average | Period |
| of Period | Income | Income | of Period | Return (%) | Net Assets | Net Assets | Net Assets | ($ x1,000,000) |
| | | | | | | | | |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash Management | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02b | .24b | .22b | .02b | 153 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .05 | .24 | .22 | .05 | 174 |
2011 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .13 | .24 | .24 | .13 | 135 |
2010 | 1.00 | .004 | (.004) | 1.00 | .40 | .29 | .22 | .34 | 139 |
2009 | 1.00 | .019 | (.019) | 1.00 | 1.88 | .22 | .17 | 1.93 | 91 |
2008c | 1.00 | .017 | (.017) | 1.00 | 3.29b | .20b | .15b | 3.15b | 115 |
Investor Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,d | .48b | .23b | .00b,d | 183 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00d | .50 | .27 | .00d | 203 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00d | .49 | .38 | .00d | 56 |
2010 | 1.00 | .002 | (.002) | 1.00 | .21 | .54 | .40 | .16 | 64 |
2009 | 1.00 | .016 | (.016) | 1.00 | 1.63 | .47 | .42 | 1.68 | 24 |
2008c | 1.00 | .015 | (.015) | 1.00 | 3.05b | .45b | .40b | 2.90b | 6 |
Administrative Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00a | .00b,d | .35b | .24b | .00b,d | 2 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .01 | .35 | .27 | .01 | 2 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .04 | .35 | .34 | .03 | 14 |
2010 | 1.00 | .003 | (.003) | 1.00 | .30 | .40 | .32 | .24 | 4 |
2009 | 1.00 | .018 | (.018) | 1.00 | 1.78 | .32 | .27 | 1.83 | —e |
2008c | 1.00 | .016 | (.016) | 1.00 | 3.19b | .30b | .25b | 3.05b | —e |
Participant Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,d | .63b | .23b | .00b,d | 36 |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00d | .64 | .28 | .00d | 62 |
2011 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00d | .64 | .38 | .00d | 48 |
2010 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .13 | .69 | .50 | .06 | 56 |
2009 | 1.00 | .015 | (.015) | 1.00 | 1.48 | .62 | .57 | 1.53 | 97 |
2008c | 1.00 | .014 | (.014) | 1.00 | 2.90b | .60b | .55b | 2.75b | 142 |
Agency Shares | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 (Unaudited) | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .00b,d | .30b | .25b | .00b,d | —e |
Year Ended January 31, | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | 1.00 | .000a | (.000)a | 1.00 | .02 | .30 | .25 | .01 | —e |
2011 | 1.00 | .001 | (.001) | 1.00 | .07 | .30 | .30 | .04 | —e |
2010 | 1.00 | .003 | (.003) | 1.00 | .34 | .35 | .28 | .28 | —e |
2009 | 1.00 | .018 | (.018) | 1.00 | 1.82 | .28 | .23 | 1.87 | —e |
2008f | 1.00 | .010 | (.010) | 1.00 | 3.09b | .26b | .21b | 3.09b | —e |
| |
a | Amount represents less than $.001 per share. |
b | Annualized. |
c | From August 1, 2007 (commencement of operations) to January 31, 2008. |
d | Amount represents less than .01%. |
e | Amount represents less than $1 million. |
f | From October 1, 2007 (commencement of initial offering) to January 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements.
70
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Per Share Data ($) | | | Ratios/Supplemental Data (%) | | |
| | | | | | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | |
| | Net Asset | | | Dividends | | from Net | | | | Net Asset | | | Ratio of | | Ratio of | | Investment | | Net Assets |
| | Value | Net | | from Net | | Realized | | | | Value | | | Total Expenses | | Net Expenses | | Income to | | End of |
| | Beginning | Investment | | Investment | | Gain on | | Total | | End | Total | | to Average | | to Average | | Average | | Period |
| | of Period | Income | | Income | | Investments | | Distributions | | of Period | Return (%) | | Net Assets | | Net Assets | | Net Assets | | ($ x1,000,000) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dreyfus New York | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AMT-Free | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Institutional Shares† | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | b,c | .33 | b | .27 | b | .00 | b,c | 91 |
Year Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .02 | | .31 | | .25 | | .02 | | 102 |
2011 | | 1.00 | .001 | | (.001 | ) | — | | (.001 | ) | 1.00 | .14 | | .31 | | .23 | | .14 | | 81 |
2010 | | 1.00 | .005 | | (.005 | ) | — | | (.005 | ) | 1.00 | .47 | | .22 | | .22 | | .47 | | 110 |
One Month Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009d | | 1.00 | .001 | | (.001 | ) | — | | (.001 | ) | 1.00 | .06 | e | .24 | b | .24 | b | .70 | b | 49 |
Year Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2008 | | 1.00 | .021 | | (.021 | ) | (.000 | )a | (.021 | ) | 1.00 | 2.08 | | .25 | | .24 | | 2.08 | | 49 |
2007 | | 1.00 | .034 | | (.034 | ) | — | | (.034 | ) | 1.00 | 3.42 | | .25 | | .25 | | 3.38 | | 64 |
Investor Shares† | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | b,c | .58 | b | .27 | b | .00 | b,c | 37 |
Year Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | c | .56 | | .28 | | .00 | c | 49 |
2011 | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | c | .55 | | .37 | | .00 | c | 50 |
2010 | | 1.00 | .003 | | (.003 | ) | — | | (.003 | ) | 1.00 | .27 | | .47 | | .43 | | .26 | | 74 |
One Month Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009d | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .04 | e | .49 | b | .49 | b | .45 | b | 102 |
Year Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2008 | | 1.00 | .018 | | (.018 | ) | (.000 | )a | (.018 | ) | 1.00 | 1.83 | | .50 | | .49 | | 1.80 | | 100 |
2007 | | 1.00 | .031 | | (.031 | ) | — | | (.031 | ) | 1.00 | 3.16 | | .50 | | .50 | | 3.12 | | 139 |
Administrative | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | b,c | .43 | b | .27 | b | .00 | b,c | 7 |
Year Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | c | .42 | | .28 | | .00 | c | 13 |
2011 | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .05 | | .40 | | .33 | | .04 | | 8 |
2010 | | 1.00 | .004 | | (.004 | ) | — | | (.004 | ) | 1.00 | .37 | | .32 | | .31 | | .38 | | 8 |
One Month Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009d | | 1.00 | .001 | | (.001 | ) | — | | (.001 | ) | 1.00 | .05 | e | .34 | b | .34 | b | .60 | b | —f |
Year Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2008g | | 1.00 | .006 | | (.006 | ) | — | | (.006 | ) | 1.00 | .62 | d | .33 | b | .33 | b | 2.02 | b | —f |
The Funds 71
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Per Share Data ($) | | | Ratios/Supplemental Data (%) | | |
| | | | | | | Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | Ratio of Net | | |
| | Net Asset | | | Dividends | | from Net | | | | Net Asset | | | Ratio of | | Ratio of | | Investment | | Net Assets |
| | Value | Net | | from Net | | Realized | | | | Value | | | Total Expenses | | Net Expenses | | Income to | | End of |
| | Beginning | Investment | | Investment | | Gain on | | Total | | End | Total | | to Average | | to Average | | Average | | Period |
| | of Period | Income | | Income | | Investments | | Distributions | | of Period | Return (%) | | Net Assets | | Net Assets | | Net Assets | | ($ x1,000,000) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Dreyfus New York | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AMT-Free | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Management | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(continued) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Participant Shares | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | b,c | .73 | b | .27 | b | .00 | b,c | —f |
Year Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | c | .71 | | .28 | | .00 | c | —f |
2011 | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | c | .70 | | .37 | | .00 | c | —f |
2010 | | 1.00 | .002 | | (.002 | ) | — | | (.002 | ) | 1.00 | .18 | | .62 | | .51 | | .18 | | —f |
One Month Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009d | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .03 | e | .64 | b | .64 | b | .30 | b | —f |
Year Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2008g | | 1.00 | .005 | | (.005 | ) | — | | (.005 | ) | 1.00 | .53 | b | .63 | b | .63 | b | 1.73 | b | —f |
Classic Shares† | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Six Months Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
July 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(Unaudited) | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | b,c | .83 | b | .27 | b | .00 | b,c | 6 |
Year Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2012 | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | c | .81 | | .29 | | .00 | c | —f |
2011 | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .00 | c | .81 | | .37 | | .00 | c | 9 |
2010 | | 1.00 | .001 | | (.001 | ) | — | | (.001 | ) | 1.00 | .13 | | .72 | | .59 | | .10 | | 60 |
One Month Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
January 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2009d | | 1.00 | .000 | a | (.000 | )a | — | | (.000 | )a | 1.00 | .02 | e | .74 | b | .73 | b | .21 | b | 76 |
Year Ended | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2008 | | 1.00 | .016 | | (.016 | ) | (.000 | )a | (.016 | ) | 1.00 | 1.58 | | .75 | | .74 | | 1.55 | | 73 |
2007 | | 1.00 | .029 | | (.029 | ) | — | | (.029 | ) | 1.00 | 2.90 | | .75 | | .75 | | 2.78 | | 79 |
|
† Represents information for the fund’s predecessor, NewYork AMT-Free Municipal Money Fund through September 12, 2008. |
a Amount represents less than $.001 per share. |
b Annualized. |
c Amount represents less than .01%. |
d The fund has changed its fiscal year end from December 31 to January 31. |
e Not annualized. |
f Amount represents less than $1 million. |
g From September 13, 2008 (commencement of initial offering) to December 31, 2008. |
See notes to financial statements.
72
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1—Significant Accounting Policies:
Dreyfus Cash Management, Dreyfus Government Cash Management, Dreyfus Government Prime Cash Management, Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management, Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management, Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus, Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management, DreyfusTax Exempt Cash Management, Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management (each, a “fund” and collectively, the “funds”) are open-end management investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Act”). Each fund, other than Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management, Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management is diversified. Dreyfus NewYork Municipal Cash Management, Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management are non-diversified. Dreyfus Government Cash Management and Dreyfus Government Prime Cash Management are each a separate series of Dreyfus Government Cash Management Funds (the “Company”) and Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management, Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management are separate series of Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management Funds (the “Trust”). Each fund’s investment objective is to provide investors with as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity and, in the case of Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus and Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management only, which are exempt from federal income tax; in the case of Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management, which is exempt from federal, New York state and New York city personal income taxes, and in the case of Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management only, which is exempt from federal and California state personal income taxes.The Dreyfus Corporation (the “Manager” or “Dreyfus”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation (“BNY Mellon”), serves as each fund’s investment adviser.
As of the close of business on August 25, 2011, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization previously approved by Dreyfus Cash Management’s Board of Trustees, all of the assets, subject to the liabilities, of Dreyfus Cash Management Plus were transferred to Dreyfus Cash Management. Shareholders of Dreyfus Cash Management Plus received Institutional Shares, Investor Shares, Administrative Shares, Participant Shares and Agency Shares of Dreyfus Cash Management, in an amount equal to the aggregate net asset value of their investment in Dreyfus Cash Management Plus at the time of the exchange. The net asset value of Dreyfus Cash Management’s shares at the close of business on August 25, 2011, after the reorganization, was $1.00 per share, and a total of 3,379,940,833 Institutional Shares, 139,359,013 Investor Shares, 373,101,182 Administrative Shares, 172,390,108 Participant Shares and 1,046 Agency Shares representing net assets of $4,064,792,182, were issued to Dreyfus Cash Management Plus shareholders in the exchange.The exchange was a tax-free event to shareholders.
The net assets immediately before the acquisition were as follows:
| |
| Net Assets ($) |
Dreyfus Cash Management | |
Plus—Target Fund | 4,064,792,182 |
Dreyfus Cash Management— | |
Acquiring Fund | 25,256,415,404 |
Total | 29,321,207,586 |
MBSC Securities Corporation (the “Distributor”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, is the distributor of the funds’ shares, which are sold to the public without a sales charge. Each fund offers Institutional Shares, Investor Shares, Administrative Shares, Participant Shares and Agency Shares (with the exception of Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management which do not offer Agency Shares). In addition, Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management also offers Service Shares, Select Shares and Premier Shares and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management also offers Classic Shares. Each share class, except Institutional Shares, is subject to a Service Plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the act. Other differences between the classes
The Funds 73
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
include the services offered (by service agents receiving Rule 12b-1 fees) to and the expenses borne by each class and certain voting rights. Income, expenses (other than expenses attributable to a specific class), and realized and unrealized gains or losses on investments are allocated to each class of shares based on its relative net assets.
As of July 31, 2012, MBC Investments Corp., an indirect subsidiary of BNY Mellon, held the following shares:
| |
Dreyfus Municipal Cash | |
Management Plus, Agency Shares | 1,036 |
|
Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash | |
Management, Agency Shares | 1,034 |
|
Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal | |
Cash Management, Agency Shares | 1,032 |
|
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal | |
Cash Management, Participant Shares | 10,000 |
It is each fund’s policy to maintain a continuous net asset value per share of $1.00; each fund has adopted certain investment, portfolio valuation and dividend and distribution policies to enable it to do so.There is no assurance, however, that any fund will be able to maintain a stable net asset value per share of $1.00.
The Company and the Trust account separately for the assets, liabilities and operations of each series. Expenses directly attributable to each series are charged to that series’ operations; expenses which are applicable to all series are allocated among them on a pro rata basis.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification is the exclusive reference of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. Each fund’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which may require the use of management estimates and assumptions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The funds enter into contracts that contain a variety of indemnifications.The funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown. The funds do not anticipate recognizing any loss related to these arrangements.
(a) Portfolio valuation: Investments in securities are valued at amortized cost in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the Act. If amortized cost is determined not to approximate market value, the fair value of the portfolio securities will be determined by procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Board of Trustees.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., the exit price). GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs of valuation techniques used to measure fair value. This hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).
Additionally, GAAP provides guidance on determining whether the volume and activity in a market has decreased significantly and whether such a decrease in activity results in transactions that are not orderly. GAAP requires enhanced disclosures around valuation inputs and techniques used during annual and interim periods.
Various inputs are used in determining the value of the each fund’s investments relating to fair value measurements.These inputs are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
Level 1—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical investments.
Level 2—other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—significant unobservable inputs (including the funds’ own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For example, money market securities are valued using amortized cost, in accordance with rules under the Act. Generally, amortized cost approximates the current fair value of a security, but since the value is not obtained from a quoted price in an active market, such securities are reflected within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
74
Table 1 summarizes the inputs used as of July 31, 2012 in valuing each fund’s investments.
At July 31, 2012, there were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
(b) Securities transactions and investment income:
Securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from securities transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis. Interest income, adjusted for accretion of discount and amortization of premium on investments, is earned from settlement date and recognized on the accrual basis. Cost of investments represents amortized cost.
Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management, Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management follow an investment policy of investing primarily in municipal obligations of one state. Economic changes affecting the state and certain of its public bodies and municipalities may affect the ability of issuers within the state to pay interest on, or repay principal of, municipal obligations held by the fund.
(c) Repurchase Agreements: Dreyfus Cash Management, Dreyfus Government Cash Management and Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management may enter into repurchase agreements with financial institutions, deemed to be creditworthy by the Manager, subject to the seller’s agreement to repurchase and the fund’s agreement to resell such securities at a mutually agreed upon price. Pursuant to the terms of the repurchase agreements, such securities must have an aggregate market value greater than or equal to the repurchase price plus accrued interest at all times. If the value of the underlying securities falls below the value of the repurchase price plus accrued interest, each fund will require the seller to deposit additional collateral by the next business day. If the request for additional collateral is not met, or the seller defaults on its repurchase obligation, each fund maintains its right to sell the underlying securities at market value and may claim any resulting loss against the seller.
(d) Dividends to shareholders: It is the policy of each fund to declare dividends from investment income-net, if any, on each business day. Such dividends, if any, are paid monthly. Dividends from net realized capital gains, if any, are normally declared and paid annually, but each fund may make distributions on a more frequent basis to comply with the distribution requirements of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).To the extent that net realized capital gains can be offset by capital loss carryovers, it is the policy of each fund not to distribute such gains.
(e) Federal income taxes: It is the policy of Dreyfus Cash Management, Dreyfus Government Cash Management, Dreyfus Government Prime Cash Management, Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management and Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company if such qualification is in the best interests of its shareholders, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code and to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
| | | | |
Table 1—Fair Value Measurements | | | | |
|
| | Short-Term Investments ($)† | |
| Level 1—Unadjusted | Level 2—Other Significant | Level 3—Significant | |
| Quoted Prices | Observable Inputs | Unobservable Inputs | Total |
Dreyfus Cash Management | — | 26,294,419,403 | — | 26,294,419,403 |
Dreyfus Government Cash Management | — | 17,316,022,040 | — | 17,316,022,040 |
Dreyfus Government Prime Cash Management | — | 4,501,163,570 | — | 4,501,163,570 |
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management | — | 18,181,055,168 | — | 18,181,055,168 |
Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management | — | 31,072,261,109 | — | 31,072,261,109 |
Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus | — | 748,880,710 | — | 748,880,710 |
Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management | — | 491,255,998 | — | 491,255,998 |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management | — | 2,355,123,086 | — | 2,355,123,086 |
Dreyfus California AMT—Free Municipal Cash Management | — | 373,215,361 | — | 373,215,361 |
Dreyfus New York AMT—Free Municipal Cash Management | — | 140,231,890 | — | 140,231,890 |
† See Statements of Investments for additional detailed categorizations.
The Funds 75
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
It is the policy of Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus, Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management, Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management, Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, which can distribute tax-exempt dividends, by complying with the applicable provisions of the Code and to make distributions of income and net realized capital gain sufficient to relieve it from substantially all federal income and excise taxes.
As of and during the period ended July 31, 2012, the funds did not have any liabilities for any uncertain tax positions. The funds recognize interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense in the Statements of Operations. During the period, the funds did not incur any interest or penalties.
Each of the tax years in the three-year period ended January 31, 2012 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities.
Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the “2010 Act”), the fund is permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 (“post-enactment losses”) for an unlimited period. Furthermore, post-enactment capital loss carryovers retain their character as either short-term or long-term capital losses rather than short-term as they were under previous statute. The 2010 Act requires post-enactment losses to be utilized before the utilization of losses incurred in taxable years prior to the effective date of the 2010 Act (“pre-enactment losses”). As a result of this ordering rule, pre-enactment losses may be more likely to expire unused.
Table 2 summarizes each relevant fund’s unused capital loss carryover available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future net realized capital gains, if any, realized subsequent to January 31, 2012.
The tax character of distributions paid to shareholders for each fund (except for Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus, Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management, Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management, Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management) during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012 was all ordinary income. The tax character of current year distributions will be determined at the end of the current fiscal year.
Table 3 summarizes the tax character of distributions paid to shareholders of Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus,
| | | | |
Table 2—Capital Loss Carryover | | | |
|
| | ($ x 1,000) | |
| | Post-Enactment | |
| 2019† | Losses†† | Total |
Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus | 10 | — | 10 |
Dreyfus Government Prime Cash Mangement | — | 48 | 48 |
Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management | — | 251 | 251 |
|
† If not applied, the carryovers expire in the above fiscal year. |
†† Post-enactment short-term capital losses that can be carried forward for an unlimited period. |
| | | |
Table 3—Tax Character of Distributions Paid | | | |
|
| | 2012 | |
| Tax-Exempt | Ordinary | Long-Term |
| Income | Income | Capital Gains |
Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus | 116 | — | — |
Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management | 152 | — | 3 |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management | 680 | — | 11 |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management | 97 | 1 | — |
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management | 16 | —† | — |
† Amount represents less than $1,000.
76
Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management, Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management, Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management during the fiscal year ended January 31, 2012.
At July 31, 2012, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was substantially the same as the cost for financial reporting purposes (see the Statements of Investments).
NOTE 2—Management Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates:
(a) Pursuant to separate management agreements with the Manager, the management fee of each fund is computed at the annual rate of .20% of the value of such fund’s average daily net assets and is payable monthly.
The Manager has undertaken to waive receipt of the management fee and/or reimburse operating expenses in order to facilitate a daily yield at or above a certain level which may change from time to time.These undertakings are voluntary and not contractual, and may be terminated at any time. Table 4 summarizes the reduction in expenses for each relevant class of shares of each fund pursuant to these undertakings during the period ended July 31, 2012.
(b) Under each fund’s Service Plan adopted pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the Act, with respect to each fund’s Investor Shares, Administrative Shares, Participant Shares and Agency Shares (with the exception of Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management which do not offer Agency Shares), Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management’s Service Shares, Select Shares and Premier Shares and Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management’s Classic Shares, each fund pays the Distributor for distributing such classes of shares, for advertising and marketing and for providing certain services relating
| | | | | |
Table 4—Expense Reductions | | | | | |
|
| | Dreyfus | Dreyfus | Dreyfus | Dreyfus |
| | Government | Government | Treasury & | Treasury |
| Dreyfus Cash | Cash | Prime Cash | Agency Cash | Prime Cash |
| Management | Management | Management | Management | Management |
Institutional Shares ($) | — | 4,499,369 | 1,780,730 | 7,140,215 | 12,682,118 |
Investor Shares ($) | 2,426,055 | 2,459,685 | 882,877 | 3,743,199 | 8,119,411 |
Administrative Shares ($) | 27,297 | 858,463 | 615,084 | 567,480 | 780,652 |
Participant Shares ($) | 1,189,674 | 552,604 | 504,333 | 1,963,596 | 7,708,840 |
Service Shares ($) | — | — | — | 85,328 | — |
Select Shares ($) | — | — | — | 69,426 | — |
Agency Shares ($) | 810 | 268,921 | 12,953 | 21,595 | 13,250 |
Premier Shares ($) | — | — | — | 54,607 | — |
| | | | | |
Table 4. (continued) | | | | | |
|
| Dreyfus | Dreyfus | | Dreyfus | Dreyfus |
| Municipal | New York | Dreyfus | California | New York |
| Cash | Municipal | Tax Exempt | AMT-Free | AMT-Free |
| Management | Cash | Cash | Municipal Cash | Municipal Cash |
| Plus | Management | Management | Management | Management |
Institutional Shares ($) | 10,889 | 37,497 | 355,499 | 10,415 | 27,058 |
Investor Shares ($) | 278,919 | 293,236 | 479,287 | 274,931 | 69,596 |
Administrative Shares ($) | 88,244 | 12,435 | 38,110 | 1,354 | 6,453 |
Participant Shares ($) | 49,199 | 16,343 | 34,441 | 91,921 | 23 |
Agency Shares ($) | 3 | — | — | — | — |
Classic Shares ($) | — | — | — | — | 14,694 |
The Funds 77
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
to shareholders of the respective class of shares. These services include answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund and providing reports and other information and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts (“Servicing”). Under the Service Plan, as to each relevant class, the Distributor may make payments to Service Agents in respect to these services. Generally, the Service Agent may provide holders of Investor, Administrative, Participant, Service, Select,Agency, Premier and Classic Shares a consolidated statement.The Service Agent will generally also provide the holders of Investor, Participant, Service, Select and/or Premier Shares, automated teller check writing privileges and, in the case of Participant, Service, Select or Premier Shares, automated teller machine access and bill paying services. The amount paid under the Service Plan for Servicing is intended to be a “service fee” as defined under the Conduct Rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), and at no time will such amount exceed the maximum amount permitted to be paid under the FINRA Conduct Rules as a service fee.The fees payable under the Service Plan are payable without regard to actual expenses incurred.
Table 5 summarizes the amount each fund was charged pursuant to the Service Plan during the period ended July 31, 2012.
(c) Each fund has adopted a Shareholder Services Plan with respect to their Institutional Shares. Each fund reimburses the Distributor an amount not to exceed an annual rate of .25% of the value of the fund’s average daily net assets attributable to Institutional Shares for certain allocated expenses of providing personal services and/or maintaining shareholder accounts. The services provided may include personal services relating to shareholder accounts, such as answering shareholder inquiries regarding the fund, providing reports and other information and services related to the maintenance of shareholder accounts. Table 6 summarizes the amount each fund’s Institutional Shares were charged pursuant to the Shareholder Services Plan during the period ended July 31, 2012.
Each fund compensates Dreyfus Transfer, Inc. (“DTI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Manager, under a transfer agency agreement for providing personnel and facilities to perform transfer agency services for the funds. Since May 29, 2012, DTI has also provided certain cash management services for the funds. Table 7 summarizes the amount each fund was charged during the period ended July 31, 2012, pursuant to the transfer agency agreement, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statements of Operations.
Each fund compensates The Bank of New York Mellon, a subsidiary of BNY Mellon and an affiliate of Dreyfus, under a custody agreement for providing custodial services for each fund.These fees were partially offset by earnings credits pur-
Table 5—Service Plan Fees
| | | | | | | | |
| Investor | Administrative | Participant | Service | Select | Agency | Premier | Classic |
| Shares ($) | Shares ($) | Shares ($) | Shares ($) | Shares ($) | Shares ($) | Shares ($) | Shares ($) |
Dreyfus Cash Management | 4,043,905 | 442,025 | 1,579,224 | — | — | 66,124 | — | — |
Dreyfus Government Cash Management | 2,005,913 | 536,236 | 476,178 | — | — | 123,198 | — | — |
Dreyfus Government | | | | | | | | |
Prime Cash Management | 619,969 | 286,532 | 399,788 | — | — | 4,935 | — | — |
Dreyfus Treasury & | | | | | | | | |
Agency Cash Management | 2,759,748 | 294,458 | 1,592,101 | 69,889 | 62,091 | 8,824 | 42,325 | — |
Dreyfus Treasury Prime | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management | 5,220,706 | 337,718 | 5,750,376 | — | — | 4,285 | — | — |
Dreyfus Municipal | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management Plus | 296,663 | 104,062 | 50,923 | — | — | 5 | — | — |
Dreyfus New York Municipal | | | | | | | | |
Cash Management | 282,976 | 12,114 | 16,083 | — | — | — | — | — |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management | 466,983 | 35,522 | 33,207 | — | — | — | — | — |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash Management | 271,413 | 1,304 | 92,145 | — | — | — | — | — |
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free | | | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash Management | 56,009 | 3,867 | 20 | — | — | — | — | 12,994 |
78
suant to the custody agreement for each relevant fund, also summarized in Table 8.
Each fund has arrangements with the transfer agent and the custodian whereby the funds may receive earnings credits when positive cash balances are maintained, which are used to offset transfer agency and custody fees. For financial reporting purposes, the funds include net earnings credits as an expense offset in the Statements of Operations.
| |
Table 6—Shareholder Services Plan Fees | |
|
| Institutional |
| Shares ($) |
Dreyfus Cash Management | 222,960 |
Dreyfus Government Cash Management | 80,309 |
Dreyfus Government Prime Cash Management | 8,500 |
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management | 199,124 |
Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management | 350,598 |
Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus | 3,028 |
Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management | 4,394 |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management | 250,050 |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management | 1,539 |
| | |
Table 7—Transfer Agency Agreement Fees | | |
|
| Transfer Agency | Cash Management |
| Fees ($) | Fees ($) |
Dreyfus Cash Management | 37,318 | 380 |
Dreyfus Government Cash Management | 44,429 | 553 |
Dreyfus Government Prime Cash Management | 41,293 | 470 |
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management | 21,389 | 245 |
Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management | 224,302 | 2,618 |
Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus | 1,205 | 10 |
Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management | 2,870 | 15 |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management | 2,959 | 36 |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management | 389 | 3 |
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management | 1,184 | 10 |
| | | |
Table 8—Custody Agreement Fees | | |
|
| Custody Fees ($) | Earnings Credits ($) |
Dreyfus Cash Management | 397,786 | — |
Dreyfus Government Cash Management | 270,417 | — |
Dreyfus Government Prime Cash Management | 92,334 | (415) |
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management | 349,208 | (1,016) |
Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management | 414,550 | — |
Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus | 32,855 | — |
Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management | 22,728 | — |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management | 61,324 | — |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management | 20,421 | — |
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management | 9,432 | — |
The Funds 79
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) (continued)
Prior to May 29, 2012, each fund compensated The Bank of New York Mellon under a cash management agreement for performing cash management services related to fund subscriptions and redemptions. Table 9 summarizes the amount each fund was charged during the period ended July 31, 2012, pursuant to the cash management agreements, which is included in Shareholder servicing costs in the Statements of Operations. These fees were partially offset by earnings credits pursuant to the cash management agreements, also summarized in Table 9.
During the period ended July 31, 2012, each fund was charged $3,183 for services performed by the Chief Compliance Officer and his staff.
Table 10 summarizes the components of “Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and affiliates” in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities for each fund.
| | | |
Table 9—Cash Management Agreement Fees | | |
|
| Cash Management | |
| Fees ($) | Earnings Credits ($) |
Dreyfus Cash Management | 2,298 | (115) |
Dreyfus Government Cash Management | 3,313 | (166) |
Dreyfus Government Prime Cash Management | 2,559 | (127) |
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency Cash Management | 1,481 | (74) |
Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management | 15,334 | (767) |
Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus | 60 | (3) |
Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management | 146 | (8) |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management | 232 | (12) |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management | 18 | (1) |
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management | 63 | (3) |
| | | | | | | |
Table 10—Due to The Dreyfus Corporation and Affiliates | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | Chief | | |
| | | | Compliance | Transfer | |
| Management | Service Plan | Custodian | Officer | Agency | Less Expense |
| Fees ($) | Fees ($) | Fees ($) | Fees ($) | Fees ($) | Reimbursement ($) |
|
Dreyfus Cash Management | 4,396,053 | 1,079,024 | 272,663 | 3,713 | 15,534 | (650,028) |
Dreyfus Government | | | | | | |
Cash Management | 2,991,225 | 565,463 | 195,473 | 3,713 | 16,285 | (1,119,584) |
Dreyfus Government | | | | | | |
Prime Cash Management | 789,057 | 238,296 | 61,757 | 3,713 | 12,513 | (582,814) |
Dreyfus Treasury & Agency | | | | | | |
Cash Management | 3,216,239 | 794,645 | 200,438 | 3,713 | 7,539 | (1,946,503) |
Dreyfus Treasury | | | | | | |
Prime Cash Management | 4,840,633 | 1,983,150 | 243,618 | 3,713 | 78,568 | (4,840,622) |
Dreyfus Municipal | | | | | | |
Cash Management Plus | 122,681 | 72,406 | 21,077 | 3,713 | 1,045 | (59,570) |
Dreyfus New York Municipal | | | | | | |
Cash Management | 84,114 | 44,620 | 15,320 | 3,713 | 1,267 | (42,217) |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt | | | | | | |
Cash Management | 435,014 | 90,881 | 42,439 | 3,713 | 3,180 | (152,628) |
Dreyfus California AMT-Free | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash Management | 64,899 | 53,641 | 13,267 | 3,713 | 626 | (47,125) |
Dreyfus New York AMT-Free | | | | | | |
Municipal Cash Management | 24,202 | 11,272 | 5,763 | 3,713 | 770 | (20,005) |
80
(d) Each Board member also serves as a Board member of other funds within the Dreyfus complex. Annual retainer fees are allocated to each fund based on net assets, and each fund pays its Board members an attendance fee of $500 per meeting.
NOTE 3—Beneficial Interest Transactions:
Each fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of $.001 par value shares of Beneficial Interest.
NOTE 4—Securities Transactions:
The funds are permitted to purchase or sell securities from or to certain affiliated funds under specified conditions outlined in procedures adopted by the Board of Trustees.The procedures have been designed to ensure that any purchase or sale of securities by the funds from or to another fund or portfolio that are, or could be, considered an affiliate by virtue of having a common investment adviser (or affiliated investment adviser), common Trustees and/or common officers, complies with Rule 17a-7 of the Act. Table 11 summarizes the amounts of purchases and sales of securities engaged in by each relevant fund pursuant to Rule 17a-7 of the Act during the period ended July 31, 2012.
NOTE 5—Subsequent Event:
At a Board meeting held on September 12, 2012, the Board of Trustees approved the termination of Agency shares in Dreyfus NewYork Municipal Cash Management and Dreyfus California AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management and Participant shares in Dreyfus NewYork AMT-Free Municipal Cash Management, effective September 14, 2012.
Table 11—Affiliated Portfolio Holdings Transactions
| | |
| Purchases ($) | Sales ($) |
Dreyfus Municipal Cash Management Plus | 407,295,000 | 341,200,000 |
Dreyfus New York Municipal Cash Management | 244,995,000 | 260,200,000 |
Dreyfus Tax Exempt Cash Management | 489,195,000 | 954,965,000 |
Dreyfus California AMT—Free Municipal Cash Management | 109,265,000 | 127,865,000 |
Dreyfus New York AMT—Free Municipal Cash Management | 52,875,000 | 40,275,000 |
The Funds 81
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF EACH
FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited)
At a joint meeting of the Boards of the above-named funds held on May 15, 2012, the Board considered the renewal of each fund’s Management Agreement pursuant to which Dreyfus provides each fund with investment advisory and administrative services (the “Agreement”).The Board members, only one of whom is an “interested person” (as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended) of each fund, were assisted in their review by independent legal counsel and met with counsel in executive session separate from Dreyfus representatives. In considering the renewal of each Agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believed to be relevant, including those discussed below.The Board did not identify any one factor as dispositive, and each Board member may have attributed different weights to the factors considered.
Analysis of Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided to the Fund. The Board considered information previously provided to them in presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided to funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, and Dreyfus representatives confirmed that there had been no material changes in this information. Dreyfus provided the number of open accounts in the funds, each fund’s asset size and the allocation of fund assets among distribution channels. Dreyfus also had previously provided information regarding the diverse intermediary relationships and distribution channels of funds in the Dreyfus fund complex and Dreyfus’ corresponding need for broad, deep, and diverse resources to be able to provide ongoing shareholder services to each intermediary or distribution channel, as applicable for the funds.
The Board also considered research support available to, and portfolio management capabilities of, the fund’s portfolio management personnel and that Dreyfus also provides oversight of day-to-day fund operations, including fund accounting and administration and assistance in meeting legal and regulatory requirements. The Board also considered Dreyfus’ extensive administrative, accounting, and compliance infrastructures.
Comparative Analysis of the Fund’s Performance and Management Fee and Expense Ratio. The Board reviewed reports prepared by Lipper, Inc. (“Lipper”), an independent provider of investment company data, which included information comparing (1) the fund’s performance with the performance of a group of comparable funds (the “Performance Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Performance Universe”), all for various periods ended March 31, 2012, and (2) the fund’s actual and contractual management fees and total expenses with those of a group of comparable funds (the “Expense Group”) and with a broader group of funds (the “Expense Universe”), the information for which was derived in part from fund financial statements available to Lipper as of the date of its analysis. Dreyfus previously had furnished the Board with a description of the methodology Lipper used to select the Performance Group and Performance Universe and the Expense Group and Expense Universe.
Dreyfus representatives stated that the usefulness of performance comparisons may be affected by a number of factors, including different investment limitations that may be applicable to the fund and comparison funds.
DREYFUS CASH MANAGEMENT
The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was variously above, at and below the Performance Group medians and above the Performance Universe medians.
The Board received presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding relative performance results overall, the existence and extent of fee waivers and expense absorptions implemented over the prior 12 months in the ongoing, historically low rate environment, and portfolio management approach.The Board noted the low absolute returns and the narrow spreads in the returns among the fund and the Performance Group funds for each reported time period. The Board also noted Dreyfus’ undertaking to waive receipt of a portion of its management fee and absorb certain fund and/or share class expenses in order to maintain a minimum yield floor limit of 0.00%.The Board also noted the portfolio manager’s presentation regarding the strategies for managing the fund’s weighted average maturity and credit risk profile, and for establishing weekly liquidity levels over the past year.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the
82
comparisons. The Board noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was below the Expense Group median and above the Expense Universe median and the fund’s total expenses were below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees paid by funds advised or administered by Dreyfus that are in the same Lipper category as the fund (the “Similar Clients”), and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. (There are no other types of client portfolios managed by Dreyfus that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund.) They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors. The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
DREYFUS GOVERNMENT CASH MANAGEMENT
The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was below the Performance Group medians and above the Performance Universe medians for the various periods, except for the one-year period when it was one basis point below the Performance Universe median.
The Board received presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding relative performance results overall, the existence and extent of fee waivers and expense absorptions implemented over the prior 12 months in the ongoing, historically low rate environment, and portfolio management approach.The Board noted the low absolute returns and that all but one of the Performance Group funds achieved a total return of two basis points or less for the one-year period, with the one other fund recording a three basis points total return for the year. The Board also noted Dreyfus’ undertaking to waive receipt of a portion of its management fee and absorb certain fund and/or share class expenses in order to maintain a minimum yield floor limit of 0.00%.The Board also noted the portfolio manager’s presentation regarding the strategies for managing the fund’s weighted average maturity and credit risk profile, and for establishing weekly liquidity levels over the past year.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. The Board noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was at the Expense Group median and the fund’s actual management fee and total expenses were below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees paid by Similar Clients, and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. (There are no other types of client portfolios managed by Dreyfus that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund.) They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
DREYFUS GOVERNMENT PRIME CASH MANAGEMENT
The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was below the Performance Group medians and at or above the Performance Universe medians for the various periods, except for the one-year period when it was one basis point below the Performance Universe median.
The Board received presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding relative performance results overall, the existence and extent of fee waivers and expense absorptions implemented over the prior 12 months in the ongoing, historically low rate environment, and portfolio management approach.The Board noted the low absolute returns and that all but one of the Performance Group funds achieved a total return of one basis point or less for the one-year period, with the one other fund recording a three basis points total return for the year. The Board also noted Dreyfus’ undertaking to waive receipt of a portion of its management fee and absorb certain fund and/or share class expenses in order to maintain a minimum yield
The Funds 83
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF EACH FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
floor limit of 0.00%. The Board also noted the portfolio manager’s presentation regarding the strategies for managing the fund’s weighted average maturity and credit risk profile, and for establishing weekly liquidity levels over the past year.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. The Board noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median and the fund’s actual management fee and total expenses were below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees paid by Similar Clients, and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. (There are no other types of client portfolios managed by Dreyfus that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund.) They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
DREYFUS TREASURY & AGENCY CASH MANAGEMENT
The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was at or below the Performance Group medians and at or above the Performance Universe medians.
The Board received presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding relative performance results overall, the existence and extent of fee waivers and expense absorptions implemented over the prior 12 months in the ongoing, historically low rate environment, and portfolio management approach.The Board noted the low absolute returns and that all but one of the Performance Group funds achieved a total return of one basis point or less for the one–year period, with the one other fund recording a three basis points total return for the year. The Board also noted Dreyfus’ undertaking to waive receipt of a portion of its management fee and absorb certain fund and/or share class expenses in order to maintain a minimum yield floor limit of 0.00%. The Board also noted the portfolio manager’s presentation regarding the strategies for managing the fund’s weighted average maturity and credit risk profile, and for establishing weekly liquidity levels over the past year.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. The Board noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median and the fund’s actual management fee and total expenses were below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees paid by Similar Clients, and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. (There are no other types of client portfolios managed by Dreyfus that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund.) They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
DREYFUS TREASURY PRIME CASH MANAGEMENT
The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was at the Performance Group medians for the various periods, except for the two-year period when it was below the Performance Group median, and variously above, at and below the Performance Universe medians.
The Board received presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding relative performance results overall, the existence and extent of fee waivers and expense absorptions implemented over the prior 12 months in the ongoing, historically low rate environment, and portfolio management approach. The Board noted the low absolute returns and that each Performance Group fund achieved a “zero” total return for the one-year period. The Board also noted Dreyfus’ undertaking to waive receipt of a portion of its management fee and absorb certain fund and/or share class expenses in order
84
to maintain a minimum yield floor limit of 0.00%.The Board also noted the portfolio manager’s presentation regarding the strategies for managing the fund’s weighted average maturity and credit risk profile, and for establishing weekly liquidity levels over the past year.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. The Board noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was above the Expense Group median and the fund’s actual management fee and total expenses were below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees paid by Similar Clients, and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. (There are no other types of client portfolios managed by Dreyfus that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund.) They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
DREYFUS TAX EXEMPT CASH MANAGEMENT
The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was below the Performance Group medians for the various periods, except for the ten-year period when it was at the Performance Group median, and above the Performance Universe medians for the various periods, except for the one-year period when it was at the Performance Universe median.
The Board received presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding relative performance results overall, the existence and extent of fee waivers and expense absorptions implemented over the prior 12 months in the ongoing, historically low rate environment, and portfolio management approach.The Board noted the low absolute returns and the narrow spread between the fund’s return and the Performance Group median for most of the periods when the fund’s performance was below median.
The Board also noted Dreyfus’ undertaking to waive receipt of a portion of its management fee and absorb certain fund and/or share class expenses in order to maintain a minimum yield floor limit of 0.00%.The Board also noted the portfolio manager’s presentation regarding the strategies for managing the fund’s weighted average maturity and credit risk profile, and for establishing weekly liquidity levels over the past year.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. The Board noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median and the fund’s actual management fee and total expenses were at or below the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees paid by Similar Clients, and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. (There are no other types of client portfolios managed by Dreyfus that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund.) They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
DREYFUS MUNICIPAL CASH MANAGEMENT PLUS
The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was above the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians for the various periods, except for the one-year period when it was at the Performance Group median.
The Board received presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding relative performance results overall, the existence and extent of fee waivers and expense absorptions implemented over the prior 12 months in the ongoing, historically low rate environment, and portfolio management approach.The Board noted the low absolute returns of the funds in the Performance Group and Performance Universe. The Board also noted Dreyfus’ undertaking to waive receipt of a portion of its man-
The Funds 85
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF EACH FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
agement fee and absorb certain fund and/or share class expenses in order to maintain a minimum yield floor limit of 0.00%.The Board also noted the portfolio manager’s presentation regarding the strategies for managing the fund’s weighted average maturity and credit risk profile, and for establishing weekly liquidity levels over the past year.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. The Board noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was above the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians and the fund’s total expenses were above the Expense Group median and below the Expense Universe median.
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees paid by Similar Clients, and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. (There are no other types of client portfolios managed by Dreyfus that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund.) They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors. The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
DREYFUS NEW YORK MUNICIPAL CASH MANAGEMENT
The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was above or at the Performance Group medians and above the Performance Universe medians.
The Board received presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding relative performance results overall, the existence and extent of fee waivers and expense absorptions implemented over the prior 12 months in the ongoing, historically low rate environment, and portfolio management approach.The Board noted the low absolute returns and the narrow spreads in the returns among the fund and the Performance Group funds for each reported time period. The Board also noted Dreyfus’ undertaking to waive receipt of a portion of its management fee and absorb certain fund and/or share class expenses in order to maintain a minimum yield floor limit of 0.00%.The Board also noted the portfolio manager’s presentation regarding the strategies for managing the fund’s weighted average maturity and credit risk profile, and for establishing weekly liquidity levels over the past year.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. The Board noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was above the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians and the fund’s total expenses were at the Expense Group median and below the Expense Universe median.
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees paid by Similar Clients, and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. (There are no other types of client portfolios managed by Dreyfus that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund.) They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
DREYFUS NEW YORK AMT-FREE MUNICIPAL CASH MANAGEMENT
The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was above or at the Performance Group and Performance Universe medians.
The Board received presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding relative performance results overall, the existence and extent of fee waivers and expense absorptions implemented over the prior 12 months in the ongoing, historically low rate environment, and portfolio management approach.The Board noted the low absolute returns and the narrow spreads in the returns among the fund and the Performance Group funds for
86
each reported time period. The Board also noted Dreyfus’ undertaking to waive receipt of a portion of its management fee and absorb certain fund and/or share class expenses in order to maintain a minimum yield floor limit of 0.00%.The Board also noted the portfolio manager’s presentation regarding the strategies for managing the fund’s weighted average maturity and credit risk profile, and for establishing weekly liquidity levels over the past year.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. The Board noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median and the fund’s actual management fee and total expenses were above the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians.
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees paid by Similar Clients, and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. (There are no other types of client portfolios managed by Dreyfus that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund.) They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors. The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
DREYFUS CALIFORNIA AMT-FREE MUNICIPAL CASH MANAGEMENT
The Board discussed the results of the comparisons and noted that the fund’s total return performance was above or at the Performance Group medians and above the Performance Universe medians.
The Board received presentations from Dreyfus representatives regarding relative performance results overall, the existence and extent of fee waivers and expense absorptions implemented over the prior 12 months in the ongoing, historically low rate environment, and portfolio management approach.The Board noted the low absolute returns and the narrow spreads in the returns among the fund and the Performance Group funds for each reported time period. The Board also noted Dreyfus’ undertaking to waive receipt of a portion of its management fee and absorb certain fund and/or share class expenses in order to maintain a minimum yield floor limit of 0.00%.The Board also noted the portfolio manager’s presentation regarding the strategies for managing the fund’s weighted average maturity and credit risk profile, and for establishing weekly liquidity levels over the past year.
The Board also reviewed the range of actual and contractual management fees and total expenses of the Expense Group and Expense Universe funds and discussed the results of the comparisons. The Board noted that the fund’s contractual management fee was below the Expense Group median, the fund’s actual management fee was above the Expense Group and Expense Universe medians, and the fund’s total expenses were at the Expense Group median and below the Expense Universe median.
Dreyfus representatives reviewed with the Board the management or investment advisory fees paid by Similar Clients, and explained the nature of the Similar Clients. (There are no other types of client portfolios managed by Dreyfus that are considered to have similar investment strategies and policies as the fund.) They discussed differences in fees paid and the relationship of the fees paid in light of any differences in the services provided and other relevant factors.The Board considered the relevance of the fee information provided for the Similar Clients to evaluate the appropriateness and reasonableness of the fund’s management fee.
Analysis of Profitability and Economies of Scale. Dreyfus representatives reviewed the expenses allocated and profit received by Dreyfus and the resulting profitability percentage for managing each fund, and the method used to determine the expenses and profit.The Board concluded that the profitability results were not unreasonable, given the services rendered and service levels provided by Dreyfus.The Board also noted the fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangement for each fund and its effect on Dreyfus’ profitability.The Board previously had been provided with information prepared by an
The Funds 87
INFORMATION ABOUT THE RENEWAL OF EACH FUND’S MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (Unaudited) (continued)
independent consulting firm regarding Dreyfus’ approach to allocating costs to, and determining the profitability of, individual funds and the entire Dreyfus fund complex.The consulting firm also had analyzed where any economies of scale might emerge in connection with the management of a fund.
The Board’s counsel stated that the Board should consider the profitability analysis (1) as part of their evaluation of whether the fees under the respective Agreement bear a reasonable relationship to the mix of services provided by Dreyfus, including the nature, extent and quality of such services, and (2) in light of the relevant circumstances for each fund and the extent to which economies of scale would be realized if the fund grows and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale for the benefit of fund shareholders. Dreyfus representatives noted that a discussion of economies of scale is predicated on a fund having achieved a substantial size with increasing assets and that, if a fund’s assets had been stable or decreasing, the possibility that Dreyfus may have realized any economies of scale would be less. Dreyfus representatives also noted that, as a result of shared and allocated costs among funds in the Dreyfus fund complex, the extent of economies of scale could depend substantially on the level of assets in the complex as a whole, so that increases and decreases in complex-wide assets can affect potential economies of scale in a manner that is disproportionate to, or even in the opposite direction from, changes in the fund’s asset level. The Board also considered potential benefits to Dreyfus from acting as investment adviser and noted that there were no soft dollar arrangements in effect for trading any fund’s investments.
At the conclusion of these discussions, the Board agreed that it had been furnished with sufficient information to make an informed business decision with respect to the renewal of each Agreement. Based on the discussions and considerations as described above, as to each fund, the Board concluded and determined as follows.
The Board generally was satisfied the fund’s relative perfor- mance in light of the various factors described above, includ- ing the ongoing, historically low interest rate environment.
The Board considered the impact of Dreyfus’ undertaking to maintain a minimum yield floor on Dreyfus’ profitability.
The Board concluded that the fee paid to Dreyfus was reasonable in light of the considerations described above.
The Board determined that the economies of scale which may accrue to Dreyfus and its affiliates in connection with the management of the fund had been adequately considered by Dreyfus in connection with the fee rate charged to the fund pursuant to the Agreement and that, to the extent in the future it were determined that material economies of scale had not been shared with the fund, the Board would seek to have those economies of scale shared with the fund.
In evaluating each Agreement, the Board considered these conclusions and determinations and also relied on its previous knowledge, gained through meetings and other interactions with Dreyfus and its affiliates, of the fund and the services provided to the fund by Dreyfus. The Board also relied on information received on a routine and regular basis throughout the year relating to the operations of the fund and the investment management and other services provided under the Agreement, including information on the investment performance of the fund in comparison to similar mutual funds; general market outlook as applicable to the fund; and compliance reports. In addition, it should be noted that the Board’s consideration of the contractual fee arrangements for each fund had the benefit of a number of years of reviews of prior or similar agreements during which lengthy discussions took place between the Board and Dreyfus representatives. Certain aspects of the arrangements may receive greater scrutiny in some years than in others, and the Board’s conclusions may be based, in part, on their consideration of the same or similar arrangements in prior years.The Board determined that renewal of each Agreement was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
88
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/832b4/832b45a04964a8c57f35727f1b9e290b0cef154c" alt=""
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Companies and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable. [CLOSED END FUNDS ONLY]
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures applicable to Item 10.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The Registrant's principal executive and principal financial officers have concluded, based on their evaluation of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and that information required to be disclosed by the Registrant in the reports that it files or submits on Form N-CSR is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There were no changes to the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not applicable.
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(a)(3) Not applicable.
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DREYFUS NEW YORK MUNICIPAL CASH MANAGEMENT
By: /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak |
Bradley J. Skapyak, President |
Date: | September 26, 2012 |
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. |
|
By: /s/ Bradley J. Skapyak |
Bradley J. Skapyak, President |
Date: | September 26, 2012 |
|
By: /s/ James Windels |
James Windels, Treasurer |
Date: | September 26, 2012 |
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
(a)(2) Certifications of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.CERT)
(b) Certification of principal executive and principal financial officers as required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940. (EX-99.906CERT)