UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
COMPANIA CERVECERIAS UNIDAS S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
UNITED BREWERIES COMPANY, INC.
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
Republic of Chile
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Vitacura 2670, 23rdfloor, Santiago, Chile
(Address of principal executive offices)
_________________________________________
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-FXForm 40-F ___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes ___ NoX
CCU REPORTS CONSOLIDATED SECOND QUARTER 2011 RESULTS(1)
|
SECOND QUARTER
Net sales up 5.9%, EBIT(2)down 40.7 %, EBITDA(3)down 28.7% Net profit(4)down 50.5% to CLP 32.0 per share
YTD
Net sales up 10.0%, EBIT(2)up 5.1%, EBITDA(3)up 5.9% Net profit(4)up 2.6% to CLP 174.9 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECOND QUARTER BEFORE NON RECURRING ITEMS (NRI)
EBIT(2)down 26.2%, EBITDA(3)down 16.3% Net profit(4)down 39.7% to CLP 32.0 per share
YTD BEFORE NRI
EBIT(2)down 2.4%, EBITDA(3)up 0.1% Net profit(4)down 5.8% to CLP 149.6 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
(Santiago, Chile, August 3, 2011)-- CCU announced today its consolidated financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2011.(5)
CCU faced difficult comparables in Q2’11 with Q2’10 mainly for three reasons.First, after the February earthquake and once we resumed production in the Santiago brewery, sales by volume experienced a remarkable increase due to the recuperation of inventory throughout the distribution chain and to significant consumption acceleration. Thus, consolidated volume grew 9.7% in Q2’10. Notwithstanding, in Q2’11 consolidated volume grew 2.4%, pushed by Beer Argentina (+6.5%) and Non alcoholic beverages (+4.9%), which offset the drop
| |
(1) | Statements made in this press release that relate to CCU’s future performance or financial results are forward-lookingstatements, which involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results tomaterially differ. We undertake no obligation to update any of these statements. Persons reading this press release arecautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These statements should be taken in conjunctionwith the additional information about risk and uncertainties set forth in CCU’s annual report on Form 20-F filed with the USSecurities and Exchange Commission and in the annual report submitted to the SVS and available in our web page. |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) | EBIT stands for Earnings Before Interest and Taxes, and corresponds to profit before Taxes, Interests, Results of indexedunits, Share of profits of associates and joint ventures and profits/(losses) on exchange rate differences. |
|
(3) | EBITDA represents EBIT plus depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a calculation based on IFRS principles. For moredetail, please see full note before Exhibits. |
|
(4) | Net profit attributable to parent company shareholders as per IFRS. |
(5) | All the comments below refers to Q2’11 figures compared to Q2’10, under IFRS. |
1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
in volumes in the other segments.Second,a price rally started at the beginning of 2011 affecting raw material, fuel and electricity, and caused a reduction in the margins this quarter. The mitigant actions, namely cost reductions and price increases, will render full effect in the coming quarters.Third,in Q2’10 we had a non recurring item related to a real estate profit, amounting CLP 6,670 million.
In all, the Gross profit increased 1.2% despite the increase in COGS although not enough to maintain the gross margin. The full effect of some price increases, which took place at the end of Q2’11, will improve the margin tendency in Q3’11 and Q4’11. With regards to the 12.5% MSD&A increase, it is mostly due to higher expenses in Beer Argentina related to inflationary pressures, to exchange rates conversion and to the expenses of the cider business acquired in December 2010. The MSD&A expenses in Chile increased 3.7% above inflation which is explained mostly by higher cost of distribution.
Thinking about the second semester’s performance, the volume comparison is still demanding in Q3’11 since this quarter in 2010 consolidated volume grew 8.7%; less so in Q4 when it increased 4.5%. Given these facts and the relevance of Q4 in the full year results, we expect to improve our margins and growth path throughout the rest of the year.
2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
|
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS(Exhibits 1 & 2) |
| |
NET SALES | |
|
Q2’11 | Total Net sales increased 5.9% to CLP 191,389 million as a result of 2.4% higherconsolidated volumes and 3.4% higher average price. Volumes increased in thesegments Beer Argentina (+6.5%) and in the Non-alcoholic beverages (+4.9%);these volume increases compensated the 6.5% decrease in Wine, 2.9% in BeerChile and 2.5% in Spirits. The higher average price is mainly explained by a 12.4%increase in the average price of Beer in Argentina, 4.6% in Non-alcoholicbeverages, 2.7% in Spirits, 2.6% in Wine and 2.4% price increase in Beer Chile.Prices increased mainly due to price adjustments to compensate higher cost ofraw material, energy and fuel in the last 12 months and to more premium productsin the mix. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 | Accumulated Net sales increased 10.0% amounting to CLP 433,651 million, as aresult of 4.5% higher consolidated volumes and 5.3% higher average prices. |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69b2f/69b2f272e97006cebba406e05e8acb84dfe9a710" alt=""
* Percentage calculations exclude “Other/Eliminations”
3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| | | | | |
Net sales by segment |
|
| Q2 (million CLP) |
| 2011 | 2010 | % Chg. |
Beer Chile | 57,753 | 30.2% | 58,615 | 32.4% | -1.5% |
Beer Argentina | 34,518 | 18.0% | 29,542 | 16.3% | 16.8% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 51,299 | 26.8% | 46,598 | 25.8% | 10.1% |
Wine | 35,102 | 18.3% | 36,671 | 20.3% | -4.3% |
Spirits | 10,835 | 5.7% | 11,006 | 6.1% | -1.6% |
Other/Eliminations | 1,882 | 1.0% | -1,684 | -0.9% | - |
TOTAL | 191,389 | 100.0% | 180,748 | 100.0% | 5.9% |
|
| YTD (million CLP) |
| 2011 | 2010 | % Chg. |
Beer Chile | 144,527 | 33.3% | 135,907 | 34.5% | 6.3% |
Beer Argentina | 86,593 | 20.0% | 74,088 | 18.8% | 16.9% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 117,417 | 27.1% | 106,332 | 27.0% | 10.4% |
Wine | 63,539 | 14.7% | 63,101 | 16.0% | 0.7% |
Spirits | 19,676 | 4.5% | 18,814 | 4.8% | 4.6% |
Other/Eliminations | 1,900 | 0.4% | -3,842 | -1.0% | - |
TOTAL | 433,651 | 100.0% | 394,400 | 100.0% | 10.0% |
| |
GROSS PROFIT |
|
Q2’11 | Increased 1.2% to CLP 95,061 million as a result of 5.9% higher Net sales,partially offset by 11.0% higherCost of goods sold (COGS)which amounted toCLP 96,328 million. As a percentage of Net sales, the COGS increased from48.0% in Q2’10 to 50.3% in Q2’11. Consequently, the Gross profit, as apercentage of Net sales, decreased from 52.0% in Q2’10 to 49.7% this quarter. |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 | Increased 6.7% to CLP 229,789 million and, as a percentage of Net sales, theconsolidated Gross profit decreased from 54.6% to 53.0% when compared to2010. |
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
Q2’11 | Decreased 40.7% to CLP 20,155 million despite the higher Gross profit, due tohigherMarketing/Selling, Distribution and Administrative expenses (MSD&A)andto the absence of a Non recurring item (NRI) corresponding to a real estate sale in2010. MSD&A expenses increased in Q2’11 by 12.5%, to CLP 75,211 million.MSD&A expenses, as a percentage of Net sales increased from 37.0% in Q2’10 to39.3% in Q2’11. Isolating the non recurring item (NRI) which generated a one timeprofit before taxes of CLP 6,670 million during the second quarter 2010, theconsolidated EBIT margin decreased from 15.1% in Q2’10 to 10.5% in Q2’11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 | Increased 5.1% amounting to CLP 86,050 million due to a higher NRI positiveeffect this year. The CLP 12,683 million positive effect of the insurance settlementduring the first quarter 2011 almost doubled the CLP 6,670 million for the sale ofthe site in Lima during the second quarter 2010. The accumulated EBIT beforeNRI decreased 2.4% and its margin decreased from 19.1% in 2010 to 16.9% in2011. The consolidated EBIT margin was 19.8%, decreasing 0.9 percentagepoints when compared to 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8dd7/f8dd7b716dc7a8eeee9a478edf59f1516e5f0c46" alt=""
* Percentage calculations exclude “Other/Eliminations”
EBIT and EBIT margin by segment
| | | | | |
| Q2 |
| EBIT (million CLP) | EBIT margin |
| 2011 | 2010 | % Chg | 2011 | 2010 |
Beer Chile | 11,355 | 14,915 | -23.9% | 19.7% | 25.4% |
Beer Argentina | 2,432 | 2,279 | 6.7% | 7.0% | 7.7% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 5,538 | 6,270 | -11.7% | 10.8% | 13.5% |
Wine | 1,909 | 3,971 | -51.9% | 5.4% | 10.8% |
Spirits | 1,396 | 1,530 | -8.7% | 12.9% | 13.9% |
Other/Eliminations | -2,476 | 5,030 | NM | - | - |
TOTAL | 20,155 | 33,996 | -40.7% | 10.5% | 18.8% |
|
| YTD |
| EBIT (million CLP) | EBIT margin |
| 2011 | 2010 | %Chg | 2011 | 2010 |
Beer Chile | 45,503 | 39,538 | 15.1% | 31.5% | 29.1% |
Beer Argentina | 12,291 | 11,490 | 7.0% | 14.2% | 15.5% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 18,307 | 16,375 | 11.8% | 15.6% | 15.4% |
Wine | 8,822 | 5,330 | 65.5% | 13.9% | 8.4% |
Spirits | 2,663 | 2,581 | 3.2% | 13.5% | 13.7% |
Other/Eliminations | -1,535 | 6,536 | NM | - | - |
TOTAL | 86,050 | 81,850 | 5.1% | 19.8% | 20.8% |
| |
EBITDA |
|
Q2’11 | Decreased 28.7%, to CLP 32,166 million and the consolidated EBITDA margindecreased from 25.0% in Q2’10 to 16.8% in Q2’11, explained by higher MSD&Aand the absence of the NRI results in 2010. Isolating the NRI derived from the saleof a site in Lima during the second quarter 2010, the consolidated EBITDA margindecreased from 21.3% in Q2’10 to 16.8% in Q2’11. |
|
|
|
|
5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| |
2011 | Increased 5.9% to CLP 109,581 million and the EBITDA margin decreased from26.2% in 2010 to 25.3% in 2011. The accumulated EBITDA before NRI increased0.1% to CLP 96,898 and the margin decreased from 24.5% in 2010 to 22.3% in2011. |
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a51d/3a51d40ff50be60dbc27dc6ed9403b2963082630" alt=""
* Percentage calculations exclude “Other/Eliminations”
EBITDA and EBITDA margin by segment
| | | | | |
| Q2 |
| EBITDA (million CLP) | EBITDA margin |
| 2011 | 2010 | % Chg | 2011 | 2010 |
Beer Chile | 15,487 | 18,511 | -16.3% | 26.8% | 31.6% |
Beer Argentina | 3,703 | 3,484 | 6.3% | 10.7% | 11.8% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 8,126 | 8,597 | -5.5% | 15.8% | 18.4% |
Wine | 3,598 | 5,658 | -36.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% |
Spirits | 1,819 | 1,954 | -6.9% | 16.8% | 17.8% |
Other/Eliminations | -566 | 6,893 | -108.2% | - | - |
TOTAL | 32,166 | 45,098 | -28.7% | 16.8% | 25.0% |
|
| YTD |
| EBITDA (million CLP) | EBITDA margin |
| 2011 | 2010 | % Chg | 2011 | 2010 |
Beer Chile | 53,506 | 46,623 | 14.8% | 37.0% | 34.3% |
Beer Argentina | 14,830 | 13,853 | 7.1% | 17.1% | 18.7% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 23,431 | 20,961 | 11.8% | 20.0% | 19.7% |
Wine | 12,063 | 8,565 | 40.8% | 19.0% | 13.6% |
Spirits | 3,474 | 3,419 | 1.6% | 17.7% | 18.2% |
Other/Eliminations | 2,278 | 10,031 | -77.3% | - | - |
TOTAL | 109,581 | 103,452 | 5.9% | 25.3% | 26.2% |
6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| | |
ALL OTHER |
|
Q2’11 | In All other we include the following: Net financing expenses, Share of profits ofassociates and joint ventures, Exchange rate differences, Result of indexed unitsand Other gains/(losses). The total variation of these accounts, when compared tothe same quarter last year, is a lower result of CLP 2,915 million mainly explainedby: |
|
|
|
|
|
| • | Other gains/(losses) and Exchange rate differences,which decreased CLP2,663 million mostly due to losses related to hedges covering foreign exchangevariations on taxes. |
|
|
|
| • | Results of indexed units,which decreased CLP 317 million, mainly due to a1.44% increase of the UF value in Q2’11 compared with a 0.97% UF variationin Q2’10 . (The UF is a monetary unit indexed to the CPI variation). |
|
|
|
| • | Share of profits of associates and joint ventures, which decreased CLP236 million, mainly explained by lower results in FOODs Compañía deAlimentos CCU S.A. and in Promarca S.A. |
|
|
|
| These was partially offset by: |
|
| • | Net financing expenses, which decreased CLP 300 million, from a netexpense of CLP 1,947 million to CLP 1,646 million as a result of higher cashand cash equivalent balances. |
|
|
|
2011 | Decreased in CLP 3,229 million from a loss of CLP 4,152 million to a loss of CLP7,382 million, due mostly to lower Other gains/(losses). |
|
|
|
INCOME TAX |
|
Q2’11 | Income tax decreased CLP 5,326 million due to the absence this year of nonrecurrent additional tax paid on the Peru site sale’s profit in 2010, the effect offoreign exchange fluctuations on taxes and lower results before taxes in Chile thisquarter. |
|
|
|
|
2011 | Decreased CLP 1,503 million mainly due to the absence this year of non recurrentadditional tax paid on the Peru site sale’s profit in 2010, the effect of foreignexchange fluctuations on taxes partially compensated by higher taxes related withthe insurance claim settlement. |
|
|
|
7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| |
MINORITY INTEREST |
|
Q2’11 | Decreased CLP 1,009 million to CLP 1,397 million mostly due to the lower resultsin Viña San Pedro Tarapacá and Aguas CCU-Nestlé. |
|
|
2011 | Increased CLP 1,048 million to CLP 5,718 million due to the higher results of ViñaSan Pedro Tarapaca S.A. explained mainly by the effect of the insurance claimsettlement. |
|
|
|
|
NET PROFIT |
|
Q2’11 | Decreased CLP 10,421 million to CLP 10,197 million due mostly to lower EBIT,lower All other result, partially compensated by lower Minority interest and lowerIncome tax. |
|
|
|
2011 | Increased CLP 1,426 million to CLP 55,711 million due mostly to higher EBIT andlower Income tax partially compensated by lower All other result and higherMinority interest |
|
|
8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
As of March 31, 2011 CCU had settled the insurance claims related to the 2010 earthquake which generated a positive non recurring effect of CLP 12,683 million, at EBIT level, to make up for the operational losses caused by the natural disaster. The compensation has the following breakdown:
1. The compensation for destroyed finished product at sales value, business interruption damages, and cost and expenses incurred in order setting and cleaning amounted to CLP 7,875 millions.
2. The compensation corresponding to machinery and equipment write offs valued at replacement cost, amounted to CLP 4,808 million.
As of April 2011, the Company received full payment of the total amount of CLP 43,478 million as total compensation of the damages caused by the 2010 earthquake.
Also, during the second quarter 2010, we recorded a NRI derived from the sale of a site in Lima which generated a one time profit before taxes of CLP 6,670 million.
The following schedules show the EBIT/EBITDA and EBIT/EBITDA margins, both, before NRI to facilitate the comparison between quarters:
| | | | | |
| Q2 |
| EBIT before NRI (million CLP) | EBIT margin before NRI |
| 2011 | 2010 | % Chg | 2011 | 2010 |
Beer Chile | 11,355 | 14,915 | -23.9% | 19.7% | 25.4% |
Beer Argentina | 2,432 | 2,279 | 6.7% | 7.0% | 7.7% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 5,538 | 6,270 | -11.7% | 10.8% | 13.5% |
Wine | 1,909 | 3,971 | -51.9% | 5.4% | 10.8% |
Spirits | 1,396 | 1,530 | -8.7% | 12.9% | 13.9% |
Other/Eliminations | -2,476 | -1,640 | 51.0% | - | - |
TOTAL | 20,155 | 27,326 | -26.2% | 10.5% | 15.1% |
|
| YTD AS OF JUNE |
| EBIT before NRI (million CLP) | EBIT margin before NRI |
| 2011 | 2010 | % Chg | 2011 | 2010 |
Beer Chile | 40,174 | 39,538 | 1.6% | 27.8% | 29.1% |
Beer Argentina | 12,291 | 11,490 | 7.0% | 14.2% | 15.5% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 17,071 | 16,375 | 4.3% | 14.5% | 15.4% |
Wine | 2,961 | 5,330 | -44.4% | 4.7% | 8.4% |
Spirits | 2,356 | 2,581 | -8.7% | 12.0% | 13.7% |
Other/Eliminations | -1,486 | -134 | 1008.2% | - | - |
TOTAL | 73,367 | 75,180 | -2.4% | 16.9% | 19.1% |
9
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| | | | | |
| Q2 |
| EBITDA before NRI (million CLP) | EBITDA margin before NRI |
| 2011 | 2010 | % Chg | 2011 | 2010 |
Beer Chile | 15,487 | 18,511 | -16.3% | 26.8% | 31.6% |
Beer Argentina | 3,703 | 3,484 | 6.3% | 10.7% | 11.8% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 8,126 | 8,597 | -5.5% | 15.8% | 18.4% |
Wine | 3,598 | 5,658 | -36.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% |
Spirits | 1,819 | 1,954 | -6.9% | 16.8% | 17.8% |
Other/Eliminations | -566 | 223 | -353.4% | - | - |
TOTAL | 32,166 | 38,429 | -16.3% | 16.8% | 21.3% |
|
| YTD AS OF JUNE |
| EBITDA before NRI (million CLP) | EBITDA margin before NRI |
| 2011 | 2010 | % Chg | 2011 | 2010 |
Beer Chile | 48,177 | 46,623 | 3.3% | 33.3% | 34.3% |
Beer Argentina | 14,830 | 13,853 | 7.1% | 17.1% | 18.7% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 22,196 | 20,961 | 5.9% | 18.9% | 19.7% |
Wine | 6,202 | 8,565 | -27.6% | 9.8% | 13.6% |
Spirits | 3,167 | 3,419 | -7.4% | 16.1% | 18.2% |
Other/Eliminations | 2,327 | 3,361 | -30.8% | - | - |
TOTAL | 96,898 | 96,782 | 0.1% | 22.3% | 24.5% |
10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
|
BUSINESS UNITS HIGHLIGHTS(Exhibits 3 & 4) |
Business segments are reflected in the same way that each Strategic Business Unit (SBU) is managed. Corporate shared services and distribution and logistics expenses have been allocated to each SBU based on Service Level Agreements. The non-allocated corporate overhead expenses, the result of the logistics subsidiary and the Cider business in Argentina are included in “Other/Eliminations”.
| |
Net sales | decreased 1.5% to CLP 57,753 million as a result of 2.9% lower sales volume and 2.4% higher average prices. |
|
EBIT | decreased 23.9% to CLP 11,355 million, mainly as a result of lower Gross profitand higher MSD&A expenses. The Gross profit decrease is explained by lower Netsales and higher COGS which increased 2.4% to CLP 24,987 million mainly due tolower finished product inventory depletion, higher cost of energy and higherdepreciation partially compensated by lower cost of raw material attributable to astronger Chilean peso. As a percentage of Net sales, COGS increased from41.6% in Q2’10 to 43.3% in Q2’11. The MSD&A expenses increased 10.2% toCLP 21,361 million due mostly to higher marketing and distribution expenses. As apercentage of Net sales, MSD&A increased from 33.1% to 37.0%. The EBITmargin decreased from 25.4% to 19.7%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA | decreased 16.3% to CLP 15,487 million and the EBITDA margin was 26.8% or 4.8percentage points lower than in Q2’10. |
|
|
Comments | The volume drop of 2.9% contrasts with the 10.3% growth experienced in Q2’10 as a consequence of the post earthquake consumption acceleration and finishedproduct inventory reposition throughout the distribution chain. Notwithstanding, thepremium category continues growing at a double digit rate. The higher averageprice is mainly due to the 6% one way packaging price increase effective August2010 and to a lesser degree, to the average price increase of 7% with inception onJune 1, 2011. This recent price increase aims to compensate the higher costs ofcommodities, fuel and electricity which are affecting the industry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net sales | measured in Chilean pesos increased 16.8% to CLP 34,518 million, as a result of 6.5% higher sales volumes and 12.4% higher average prices in order to partiallycompensate the increase in costs and expenses due to inflation. It has to behighlighted that in 2010 Beer Argentina had extraordinary Net income from thepost earthquake beer exports to Chile for CLP 848 million. |
|
|
|
|
EBIT | measured in Chilean pesos increased 6.7% to CLP 2,432 million in Q2’11, as aconsequence of higher Gross profit, partially compensated by higher MSD&A.Gross profit increased due to higher Net sales enough to compensate the higher |
|
|
11
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| |
| MSD&A expenses which increased 28.3%, from CLP 13,568 million to CLP17,402 million, due to inflationary pressures, unionization of sales personnel,higher marketing, higher distribution expenses and sales taxes. COGS increased8.1%, to CLP 14,780 million this quarter mainly due to higher cost of raw materialand energy costs. As a percentage of Net sales, COGS decreased from 46.3% to42.8% in Q2’11. As a percentage of Net sales, MSD&A expenses increased from45.9% to 50.4%. The EBIT margin decreased from 7.7% in Q2’10 to 7.0% inQ2’11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
EBITDA | increased 6.3% to CLP 3,703 million this quarter and the EBITDA margindecreased from 11.8% to 10.7%. |
|
| |
Comments | Sales prices were adjusted during February 2011 and again in July 2011 in orderto compensate for the inflationary cost pressures. Total volume grew 6.5%, wherepremium brands volumes increased at a double digit rate. The results in Chileanpesos are affected by the depreciation of the Argentinean peso (4.8%) and theappreciation of the Chilean peso (11.0%), both vis a vis the dollar. The results indollars are as follows: EBIT increased 14.7% and EBITDA increased 15.8%, whilethe EBITDA margin decreased from 12.8% to 11.1%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net sales | increased 10.1% to CLP 51,299 million due to higher volumes of 4.9% and a 4.6% increase in the average price. |
|
EBIT | decreased 11.7% to CLP 5,538 million, despite of higher Net sales due to higherCOGS and higher MSD&A expenses. COGS increased 15.6% to CLP 27,233million mainly due to price increases in raw material such as sugar and resin, andin energy. COGS, as a percentage of Net sales, increased from 50.6% to 53.1%.As a consequence, gross margin decreased from 49.4% to 46.9%. MSD&Aincreased 9.7% to CLP 18,475 million mainly due to higher distribution andmarketing expenses, while as a percentage of Net sales, MSD&A remained almostflat at 36.1% and the EBIT margin decreased from 13.5% to 10.8%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA | decreased 5.5% to CLP 8,126 million and the EBITDA margin decreased to15.8%, 2.6 percentage points lower than in Q2’10. |
|
|
Comments | Volumes had a remarkable performance during the quarter considering the tough comparable of 2010 after the earthquake: nectars increased 9.6%, soft drinks2.7%, and water 9.2%. The segment’s average price increased 4.6% due to the3% price increase in all categories on November 2010 and 1% in soft drinks at thebeginning of April 2011. The purpose of these price actions is to mitigate rawmaterials, energy and fuel price raise. |
|
|
|
|
12
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| |
Net sales | decreased 4.3% to CLP 35,102 million due to a decrease in volume of 6.5%, excluding bulk wine, partially offset by an increase of 2.6% in the average price inCLP. Chile exports volume decreased 11.9% while price increased 13% in USD.The Chile domestic volume decreased 2.1%, however fine wine sales grew 20.7%and domestic prices increased 11.9% due to price increases in August 2010 andMay/June 2011. The Chilean currency became 11.0% stronger than the USDduring the quarter. Argentina’s volume increased 6.1% while average USD priceincreased 16.9%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
EBIT | decreased 51.9% from CLP 3,971 million to CLP 1,909 million in Q2’11, duemostly to lower Gross profit as a consequence of lower Net sales and higherCOGS, marginally compensated by lower MSD&A. COGS increased 3.0% fromCLP 22,789 million to CLP 23,480 million due mostly to the higher cost of wine andenergy. As a percentage of Net sales, COGS increased from 62.1% to 66.9%.Consequently, the gross margin decreased from 37.9% to 33.1% in Q2’11.MSD&A decreased 1.7% to CLP 9,775 million. As a percentage of Net sales,MSD&A increased from 27.1% to 27.8%. As a consequence, the EBIT margindecreased from 10.8% in Q2’10 to 5.4% in Q2’11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
EBITDA | decreased 36.4% to CLP 3,598 million and the EBITDA margin decreased from15.4% to 10.2%. |
|
| |
Comments | The industry has been affected by higher grape and wine prices, as a direct consequence of stocks lost during last year’s earthquake and a smaller 2010 and2011 vintage. This has had a direct impact on COGS. Additionally, thestrengthening of the Chilean currency vis a vis the foreign currencies in thecompany’s export markets has affected revenues. In order to compensate for therevenue erosion, the company has increased prices and improved sales puttingspecial focus on fine wines. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Net sales | decreased 1.6% to CLP 10,835 million as a result of lower sales of non core products (ie wine). Net sales of core products were flat due to 2.7% higheraverage price compensated by 2.5% lower volume. |
|
| |
EBIT | decreased 8.7% from CLP 1,530 million to CLP 1,396 million, mainly due to lowerNet sales and higher MSD&A, partially compensated by lower COGS, whichdecreased 1.2% from CLP 5,708 million to CLP 5,641 million, due mostly to lowervolume of non core products. COGS as a percentage of Net sales increased from51.9% to 52.1%. MSD&A expenses increased 1.0% to CLP 3,802 million, mostlydue to a one time severance payment. As a percentage of Net sales, MSD&Aincreased from 34.2% to 35.1%. As a consequence, the EBIT margin decreasedfrom 13.9% to 12.9%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| |
EBITDA
| decreased 6.9% from CLP 1,954 million to CLP 1,819 million, while the EBITDAmargin decreased from 17.8% to 16.8%. |
|
| |
Comments
| Premium pisco volume had a good performance increasing 8% in Q2 inanticipation of a 4% price increase announcement to be effective in mid July.Since July 1 CPCh began the distribution in Chile of Pernod Ricard products in allchannels with the exception of modern trade. |
|
|
|
(The exhibits to follow, figures have been rounded and may not sum exactly the totals shown.)
Note: EBITDA represents EBIT plus depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a calculation based on generally accepted accounting principles. The amounts in the EBITDA calculation, however, are derived from amounts included in the historical statements of income data. EBITDA is presented as supplemental information because management believes that EBITDA is useful in assessing the Company’s operations. EBITDA is useful in evaluating the operating performance compared to that of other companies, as the calculation of EBITDA eliminates the effects of financing, income taxes and the accounting of capital spending, which items may vary for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. When analyzing the operating performance, however, investors should use EBITDA in addition to, not as an alternative for, EBIT and net income. Investors should also note that CCU’s presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies
14
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| | | | | |
Exhibit 1: Income Statement (Second Quarter 2011) | | | | |
Q2 | 2011 | 2010 | 2010(1) | 2009(1) | VARIANCE % |
| (CLP million) | (CLP million) | (US$ million) | (US$ million) | |
Core revenue | 187,682 | 177,127 | 400.9 | 378.4 | 6.0 |
Other revenue | 3,707 | 3,621 | 7.9 | 7.7 | 2.4 |
Interco sales revenue | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - |
Net sales | 191,389 | 180,748 | 408.8 | 386.1 | 5.9 |
Cost of goods sold | (96,328) | (86,777) | (205.8) | (185.4) | 11.0 |
% of net sales | 50.3 | 48.0 | 50.3 | 48.0 | |
Gross profit | 95,061 | 93,971 | 203.1 | 200.7 | 1.2 |
MSD&A(2) | (75,211) | (66,881) | (160.7) | (142.9) | 12.5 |
% of net sales | 39.3 | 37.0 | 39.3 | 37.0 | |
Other operating income/(expenses) | 305 | 236 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 29.2 |
EBIT before NRI | 20,155 | 27,326 | 43.1 | 58.4 | (26.2) |
% of net sales | 10.5 | 15.1 | 10.5 | 15.1 | |
NRI | 0 | 6,670 | 0.0 | 14.2 | - |
EBIT | 20,155 | 33,996 | 43.1 | 72.6 | (40.7) |
% of net sales | 10.5 | 18.8 | 10.5 | 18.8 | |
Net financing expenses | (1,646) | (1,947) | (3.5) | (4.2) | (15.4) |
Share of profits of associates and joint | | | | | |
ventures | 79 | 315 | 0.2 | 0.7 | (75.0) |
Exchange rate differences | (500) | (420) | (1.1) | (0.9) | 19.1 |
Results of indexed units | (2,444) | (2,127) | (5.2) | (4.5) | 14.9 |
Other gains/(losses) | (783) | 1,800 | (1.7) | 3.8 | n/a |
INCOME/(LOSS) BEFORE TAXES | 14,860 | 31,616 | 31.7 | 67.5 | (53.0) |
Income tax | (3,266) | (8,592) | (7.0) | (18.4) | (62.0) |
NET PROFIT FOR THE PERIOD | 11,594 | 23,024 | 24.8 | 49.2 | (49.6) |
|
NET PROFIT before NRI | | | | | |
ATTRIBUTABLE TO: | | | | | |
PARENT COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS | 10,197 | 16,913 | 21.8 | 36.1 | (39.7) |
|
NET PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO: | | | | | |
PARENT COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS | 10,197 | 20,618 | 21.8 | 44.0 | (50.5) |
MINORITY INTEREST | 1,397 | 2,406 | 3.0 | 5.1 | (41.9) |
|
Net profit attributable to Parent Company | | | | | |
Shareholders as % of net sales | 5.3 | 11.4 | 5.3 | 11.4 | |
|
Earnings per share | 32.0 | 64.7 | 0.1 | 0.1 | (50.5) |
Earnings per ADR | 160.1 | 323.7 | 0.3 | 0.7 | (50.5) |
|
EBITDA(3)before NRI | 32,166 | 38,429 | 68.7 | 82.1 | (16.3) |
% of net sales | 16.8 | 21.3 | 16.8 | 21.3 | |
EBITDA(3) | 32,166 | 45,098 | 68.7 | 96.3 | (28.7) |
% of net sales | 16.8 | 25.0 | 16.8 | 25.0 | |
|
OTHER INFORMATION | | | | | |
Number of shares | 318,502,872 | 318,502,872 | 318,502,872 | 318,502,872 | |
Shares per ADR | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
|
DEPRECIATION | 12,012 | 11,103 | 25.7 | 23.7 | 8.2 |
Capital Expenditures | 13,910 | 14,601 | 29.7 | 31.2 | (4.7) |
(1) Exchange rate: US$1.00 = CLP 468.15 | | | | | |
(2) MSD&A refers to Marketing selling, distribution and administrative expenses | | | | |
(3) Please see full note in page before exhibits | | | | | |
15
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| | | | | |
Exhibit 2: Income Statement (Six Months ended on June 30, 2011) | | | |
|
YTD AS OF JUNE | 2011 | 2010 | 2011(1) | 2010(1) | VARIANCE % |
| (CLP million) | (CLP million) | (US$ million) | (US$ million) | |
Core revenue | 425,582 | 386,796 | 909.1 | 826.2 | 10.0 |
Other revenue | 8,070 | 7,604 | 17.2 | 16.2 | 6.1 |
Interco sales revenue | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - |
Net sales | 433,651 | 394,400 | 926.3 | 842.5 | 10.0 |
Cost of goods sold | (203,862) | (178,941) | (435.5) | (382.2) | 13.9 |
% of net sales | 47.0 | 45.4 | 47.0 | 45.4 | |
Gross profit | 229,789 | 215,459 | 490.8 | 460.2 | 6.7 |
MSD&A(2) | (157,871) | (140,621) | (337.2) | (300.4) | 12.3 |
% of net sales | 36.4 | 35.7 | 36.4 | 35.7 | |
Other operating income/(expenses) | 1,449 | 342 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 323.6 |
EBIT before NRI | 73,367 | 75,180 | 156.7 | 160.6 | (2.4) |
% of net sales | 16.9 | 19.1 | 16.9 | 19.1 | |
NRI | 12,683 | 6,670 | 27.1 | 14.2 | 90.2 |
EBIT | 86,050 | 81,850 | 183.8 | 174.8 | 5.1 |
% of net sales | 19.8 | 20.8 | 19.8 | 20.8 | |
Net financing expenses | (3,500) | (4,373) | (7.5) | (9.3) | (20.0) |
Share of profits of associates and joint | | | | | |
ventures | 792 | 226 | 1.7 | 0.5 | 249.8 |
Exchange rate differences | (378) | 39 | (0.8) | 0.1 | n/a |
Results of indexed units | (3,593) | (2,677) | (7.7) | (5.7) | 34.2 |
Other gains/(losses) | (702) | 2,632 | (1.5) | 5.6 | n/a |
INCOME/(LOSS) BEFORE TAXES | 78,668 | 77,697 | 168.0 | 166.0 | 1.2 |
Income tax | (17,239) | (18,743) | (36.8) | (40.0) | (8.0) |
NET PROFIT FOR THE PERIOD | 61,429 | 58,955 | 131.2 | 125.9 | 4.2 |
|
NET PROFIT before NRI | | | | | |
ATTRIBUTABLE TO: | | | | | |
PARENT COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS | 47,652 | 50,581 | 101.8 | 108.0 | (5.8) |
|
NET PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO: | | | | | |
PARENT COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS | 55,711 | 54,286 | 119.0 | 116.0 | 2.6 |
MINORITY INTEREST | 5,718 | 4,669 | 12.2 | 10.0 | 22.5 |
|
Net profit attributable to Parent Company | | | | | |
Shareholders as % of net sales | 12.8 | 13.8 | 12.8 | 13.8 | |
|
Earnings per share | 174.9 | 170.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2.6 |
Earnings per ADR | 874.6 | 852.2 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 2.6 |
|
EBITDA(3)before NRI | 96,898 | 96,782 | 207.0 | 206.7 | 0.1 |
% of net sales | 22.3 | 24.5 | 22.3 | 24.5 | |
EBITDA(3) | 109,581 | 103,452 | 234.1 | 221.0 | 5.9 |
% of net sales | 25.3 | 26.2 | 25.3 | 26.2 | |
|
OTHER INFORMATION | | | | | |
Number of shares | 318,502,872 | 318,502,872 | 318,502,872 | 318,502,872 | |
Shares per ADR | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
|
DEPRECIATION | 23,531 | 21,603 | 50.3 | 46.1 | 8.9 |
Capital Expenditures | 26,787 | 25,925 | 57.2 | 55.4 | 3.3 |
(1) Exchange rate: US$1.00 = CLP 468.15 | | | | | |
(2) MSD&A refers to Marketing selling, distribution and administrative expenses | | | | |
(3) Please see full note in page before exhibits | | | | | |
16
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exhibit 3: Segment Information - Second Quarter 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Q2 | Beer Chile | Beer Argentina | Non-Alcoholic | Wines | Spirits | Other/eliminations | Total |
(CLP million) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 |
Core revenue | 57,078 | 57,394 | 34,215 | 28,605 | 50,068 | 45,620 | 33,819 | 35,254 | 10,272 | 10,253 | 2,230 | 0 | 187,682 | 177,127 |
Other revenue | 590 | 650 | 282 | 90 | 407 | 238 | 1,279 | 1,413 | 127 | 249 | 1,022 | 982 | 3,707 | 3,621 |
Interco sales revenue | 85 | 570 | 20 | 848 | 825 | 739 | 4 | 4 | 436 | 504 | (1,371) | (2,666) | 0 | 0 |
Net sales | 57,753 | 58,615 | 34,518 | 29,542 | 51,299 | 46,598 | 35,102 | 36,671 | 10,835 | 11,006 | 1,882 | (1,684) | 191,389 | 180,748 |
variance % | -1.5 | | 16.8 | | 10.1 | | -4.3 | | -1.6 | | | | 5.9 | |
Cost of goods sold | (24,987) | (24,392) | (14,780) | (13,672) | (27,233) | (23,562) | (23,480) | (22,789) | (5,641) | (5,708) | (208) | 3,346 | (96,328) | (86,777) |
% of net sales | 43.3 | 41.6 | 42.8 | 46.3 | 53.1 | 50.6 | 66.9 | 62.1 | 52.1 | 51.9 | | | 50.3 | 48.0 |
Gross profit | 32,767 | 34,223 | 19,738 | 15,871 | 24,067 | 23,036 | 11,621 | 13,882 | 5,194 | 5,298 | 1,674 | 1,661 | 95,061 | 93,971 |
MSD&A(1) | (21,361) | (19,383) | (17,402) | (13,568) | (18,475) | (16,838) | (9,775) | (9,944) | (3,802) | (3,766) | (4,396) | (3,383) | (75,211) | (66,881) |
% of net sales | 37.0 | 33.1 | 50.4 | 45.9 | 36.0 | 36.1 | 27.8 | 27.1 | 35.1 | 34.2 | | | 39.3 | 37.0 |
Other operating income/(expenses) | (51) | 74 | 96 | (24) | (54) | 73 | 63 | 33 | 4 | (2) | 247 | 82 | 305 | 236 |
EBIT before NRI(2) | 11,355 | 14,915 | 2,432 | 2,279 | 5,538 | 6,270 | 1,909 | 3,971 | 1,396 | 1,530 | (2,476) | (1,640) | 20,155 | 27,326 |
variance % | -23.9 | | 6.7 | | -11.7 | | -51.9 | | -8.7 | | | | -26.2 | |
% of net sales | 19.7 | 25.4 | 7.0 | 7.7 | 10.8 | 13.5 | 5.4 | 10.8 | 12.9 | 13.9 | | | 10.5 | 15.1 |
NRI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6,670 | 0 | 6,670 |
EBIT | 11,355 | 14,915 | 2,432 | 2,279 | 5,538 | 6,270 | 1,909 | 3,971 | 1,396 | 1,530 | (2,476) | 5,030 | 20,155 | 33,996 |
variance % | -23.9 | | 6.7 | | -11.7 | | -51.9 | | -8.7 | | | | -40.7 | |
% of net sales | 19.7 | 25.4 | 7.0 | 7.7 | 10.8 | 13.5 | 5.4 | 10.8 | 12.9 | 13.9 | | | 10.5 | 18.8 |
EBITDA before NRI(2) | 15,487 | 18,511 | 3,703 | 3,484 | 8,126 | 8,597 | 3,598 | 5,658 | 1,819 | 1,954 | (566) | 223 | 32,166 | 38,429 |
variance % | -16.3 | | 6.3 | | -5.5 | | -36.4 | | -6.9 | | | | -16.3 | |
% of net sales | 26.8 | 31.6 | 10.7 | 11.8 | 15.8 | 18.4 | 10.2 | 15.4 | 16.8 | 17.8 | | | 16.8 | 21.3 |
EBITDA | 15,487 | 18,511 | 3,703 | 3,484 | 8,126 | 8,597 | 3,598 | 5,658 | 1,819 | 1,954 | (566) | 6,893 | 32,166 | 45,098 |
variance % | -16.3 | | 6.3 | | -5.5 | | -36.4 | | -6.9 | | -108.2 | | -28.7 | |
% of net sales | 26.8 | 31.6 | 10.7 | 11.8 | 15.8 | 18.4 | 10.2 | 15.4 | 16.8 | 17.8 | | | 16.8 | 25.0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Q2 | Beer Chile | Beer Argentina(3) | Non- alcoholic(4) | Wine(5) | Spirits | Other/eliminations | Total |
VOLUMES(HL) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 |
SEGMENT VOLUME | 1,014,325 | 1,044,807 | 827,853 | 777,687 | 1,422,595 | 1,355,747 | 313,996 | 335,865 | 51,271 | 52,564 | 23,652 | - | 3,653,690 | 3,566,671 |
variance % | -2.9 | | 6.5 | | 4.9 | | -6.5 | | -2.5 | | - | | 2.4 | |
| | | | | SOFT DRINKS | CHILE DOMESTIC | | | | | | |
| | | | | 932,757 | 907,807 | 149,408 | 152,589 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 2.7 | | -2.1 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | NECTAR | CHILE EXPORTS | | | | | | |
| | | | | 234,672 | 214,203 | 146,422 | 166,148 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 9.6 | | -11.9 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | WATER | ARGENTINA | | | | | | |
| | | | | 255,165 | 233,737 | 18,166 | 17,128 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 9.2 | | 6.1 | | | | | | | |
(1)MSD&A refers to Marketing selling, distribution and administrative expenses (2)NRI refers to Non-recurring items (3)Excludes exports to Chile of 2,033 Hl and 32,880 Hl in 2011 and 2010 respectively (4)Includes softdrink (sofdrink, tea , sports and energetic drinks) , nectars and water (purified and mineral) (5)Excludes bulk wine of 12,900 Hl and 13,076 Hl in 2011 and 2010 respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 | Beer Chile | Beer Argentina | Non-Alcoholic | Wines | Spirits | Other/eliminations | Total |
AVE. PRICES (CLP/Hl) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 |
SEGMENT AVE. PRICE | 56,272 | 54,933 | 41,330 | 36,782 | 35,195 | 33,650 | 107,705 | 104,965 | 200,347 | 195,062 | 94,299 | | 51,368 | 49,662 |
variance % | 2.4 | | 12.4 | | 4.6 | | 2.6 | | 2.7 | | | | 3.4 | |
| | | | | SOFT DRINKS | CHILE DOMESTIC | | | | | | |
| | | | | 34,791 | 32,807 | 80,765 | 72,195 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 6.0 | | 11.9 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | NECTAR | CHILE EXPORTS | | | | | | |
| | | | | 45,526 | 44,566 | 130,047 | 130,963 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 2.2 | | -0.7 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | WATER | ARGENTINA | | | | | | |
| | | | | 27,169 | 26,918 | 149,194 | 144,703 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 0.9 | | 3.1 | | | | | | | |
17
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Exhibit 4: Segment Information - Six Months ended on June 30, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
YTD AS OF JUNE | Beer Chile | Beer Argentina | Non-Alcoholic | Wines | Spirits | Other/eliminations | Total |
(CLP million) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 |
Core revenue | 142,977 | 133,337 | 85,336 | 70,994 | 114,761 | 104,159 | 60,835 | 60,354 | 18,731 | 17,952 | 2,941 | 0 | 425,582 | 386,796 |
Other revenue | 1,396 | 1,351 | 1,215 | 944 | 706 | 501 | 2,697 | 2,741 | 257 | 355 | 1,798 | 1,710 | 8,070 | 7,604 |
Interco sales revenue | 154 | 1,219 | 41 | 2,150 | 1,950 | 1,672 | 7 | 6 | 687 | 506 | (2,840) | (5,552) | 0 | 0 |
Net sales | 144,527 | 135,907 | 86,593 | 74,088 | 117,417 | 106,332 | 63,539 | 63,101 | 19,676 | 18,814 | 1,900 | (3,842) | 433,651 | 394,400 |
variance % | 6.3 | | 16.9 | | 10.4 | | 0.7 | | 4.6 | | | | 10.0 | |
Cost of goods sold | (58,533) | (54,208) | (34,397) | (31,628) | (59,421) | (50,738) | (42,054) | (39,489) | (10,267) | (9,723) | 810 | 6,845 | (203,862) | (178,941) |
% of net sales | 40.5 | 39.9 | 39.7 | 42.7 | 50.6 | 47.7 | 66.2 | 62.6 | 52.2 | 51.7 | | | 47.0 | 45.4 |
Gross profit | 85,994 | 81,699 | 52,195 | 42,460 | 57,996 | 55,594 | 21,485 | 23,612 | 9,409 | 9,091 | 2,710 | 3,003 | 229,789 | 215,459 |
MSD&A(1) | (45,794) | (42,398) | (40,075) | (30,969) | (41,788) | (39,351) | (18,683) | (18,306) | (7,063) | (6,510) | (4,469) | (3,087) | (157,871) | (140,621) |
% of net sales | 31.7 | 31.2 | 46.3 | 41.8 | 35.6 | 37.0 | 29.4 | 29.0 | 35.9 | 34.6 | | | 36.4 | 35.7 |
Other operating income/(expenses) | (25) | 236 | 170 | (0) | 863 | 132 | 159 | 25 | 9 | (1) | 273 | (50) | 1,449 | 342 |
EBIT before NRI(2) | 40,174 | 39,538 | 12,291 | 11,490 | 17,071 | 16,375 | 2,961 | 5,330 | 2,356 | 2,581 | (1,486) | (134) | 73,367 | 75,180 |
variance % | 1.6 | | 7.0 | | 4.3 | | -44.4 | | -8.7 | | | | -2.4 | |
% of net sales | 27.8 | 29.1 | 14.2 | 15.5 | 14.5 | 15.4 | 4.7 | 8.4 | 12.0 | 13.7 | | | 16.9 | 19.1 |
NRI | 5,329 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,236 | 0 | 5,861 | 0 | 307 | 0 | (49) | 6,670 | 12,683 | 6,670 |
EBIT | 45,503 | 39,538 | 12,291 | 11,490 | 18,307 | 16,375 | 8,822 | 5,330 | 2,663 | 2,581 | (1,535) | 6,536 | 86,050 | 81,850 |
variance % | 15.1 | | 7.0 | | 11.8 | | 65.5 | | 3.2 | | -123.5 | | 5.1 | |
% of net sales | 31.5 | 29.1 | 14.2 | 15.5 | 15.6 | 15.4 | 13.9 | 8.4 | 13.5 | 13.7 | | | 19.8 | 20.8 |
EBITDA before NRI(2) | 48,177 | 46,623 | 14,830 | 13,853 | 22,196 | 20,961 | 6,202 | 8,565 | 3,167 | 3,419 | 2,327 | 3,361 | 96,898 | 96,782 |
variance % | 3.3 | | 7.1 | | 5.9 | | -27.6 | | -7.4 | | -30.8 | | 0.1 | |
% of net sales | 33.3 | 34.3 | 17.1 | 18.7 | 18.9 | 19.7 | 9.8 | 13.6 | 16.1 | 18.2 | | | 22.3 | 24.5 |
EBITDA | 53,506 | 46,623 | 14,830 | 13,853 | 23,431 | 20,961 | 12,063 | 8,565 | 3,474 | 3,419 | 2,278 | 10,031 | 109,581 | 103,452 |
variance % | 14.8 | | 7.1 | | 11.8 | | 40.8 | | 1.6 | | -77.3 | | 5.9 | |
% of net sales | 37.0 | 34.3 | 17.1 | 18.7 | 20.0 | 19.7 | 19.0 | 13.6 | 17.7 | 18.2 | | | 25.3 | 26.2 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
YTD AS OF JUNE | Beer Chile | Beer Argentina(3) | Non- alcoholic(4) | Wine(5) | Spirits | Other/eliminations | Total |
VOLUMES (HL) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 |
TOTAL SEGMENT | 2,537,595 | 2,435,107 | 2,091,881 | 1,960,653 | 3,304,224 | 3,169,477 | 565,351 | 591,693 | 94,624 | 93,231 | 30,762 | - | 8,624,435 | 8,250,161 |
variance % | 4.2 | | 6.7 | | 4.3 | | -4.5 | | 1.5 | | - | | 4.5 | |
| | | | | SOFT DRINKS | CHILE DOMESTIC | | | | | | |
| | | | | 2,138,611 | 2,081,047 | 261,883 | 266,287 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 2.8 | | -1.7 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | NECTAR | CHILE EXPORTS | | | | | | |
| | | | | 468,510 | 414,231 | 271,823 | 290,499 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 13.1 | | -6.4 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | WATER | ARGENTINA | | | | | | |
| | | | | 697,102 | 674,199 | 31,645 | 34,907 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 3.4 | | -9.3 | | | | | | | |
(1)MSD&A refers to Marketing selling, distribution and administrative expenses (2)NRI refers to Non-recurring items (3)Excludes exports to Chile of 4,937 Hl and 78,484 Hl in 2011 and 2010 respectively (4)Includes softdrink (sofdrink, tea , sports and energetic drinks) , nectars and water (purified and mineral) (5)Excludes bulk wine of 31,691 Hl and 28,724 Hl in 2011 and 2010 respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
YTD AS OF JUNE | Beer Chile | Beer Argentina | Non-Alcoholic | Wines | Spirits | Other/eliminations | Total |
AVE. PRICES (CLP/Hl) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 |
SEGMENT AVE. PRICE | 56,344 | 54,756 | 40,794 | 36,209 | 34,732 | 32,863 | 107,604 | 102,001 | 197,956 | 192,554 | 95,618 | | 49,346 | 46,883 |
variance % | 2.9 | | 12.7 | | 5.7 | | 5.5 | | 2.8 | | - | | 5.3 | |
| | | | | SOFT DRINKS | CHILE DOMESTIC | | | | | | |
| | | | | 34,495 | 32,454 | 80,934 | 69,374 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 6.3 | | 16.7 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | NECTAR | CHILE EXPORTS | | | | | | |
| | | | | 45,935 | 44,545 | 128,369 | 127,469 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 3.1 | | 0.7 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | WATER | ARGENTINA | | | | | | |
| | | | | 27,926 | 26,948 | 149,943 | 138,954 | | | | | | |
variance % | | | | | 3.6 | | 7.9 | | | | | | | |
18
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42db4/42db4ecb7fcd2f332ecedc176c443ff3fca89773" alt=""
| | | | | |
Exhibit 5: Balance Sheet | | | | | |
| June 30 | December 31 | June 30 | December 31 | % |
| 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | Change |
ASSETS | (CLP million) | (CLP million) | (US$ million)(1) | (US$ million)(1) | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 151,877 | 151,614 | 324 | 324 | 0.2 |
Other current assets | 271,654 | 294,668 | 580 | 629 | (7.8) |
Total current assets | 423,531 | 446,282 | 905 | 953 | (5.1) |
| | | | | |
PP&E (net) | 522,792 | 508,162 | 1,117 | 1,085 | 2.9 |
Other non current assets | 192,372 | 197,245 | 411 | 421 | (2.5) |
Total non current assets | 715,164 | 705,407 | 1,528 | 1,507 | 1.4 |
Total assets | 1,138,695 | 1,151,689 | 2,432 | 2,460 | (1.1) |
| | | | | |
LIABILITIES | | | | | |
Loans and other liabilities | 32,041 | 12,822 | 68 | 27 | 149.9 |
Other liabilities | 168,045 | 224,136 | 359 | 479 | (25.0) |
Total current liabilities | 200,086 | 236,958 | 427 | 506 | (15.6) |
| | | | | |
Loans and other liabilities | 211,984 | 220,145 | 453 | 470 | (3.7) |
Other liabilities | 83,428 | 79,512 | 178 | 170 | 4.9 |
Total non current liabilities | 295,412 | 299,657 | 631 | 640 | (1.4) |
Total Liabilities | 495,497 | 536,615 | 1,058 | 1,146 | (7.7) |
| | | | | |
EQUITY | | | | | |
Paid-in capital | 231,020 | 231,020 | 493 | 493 | 0.0 |
Other reserves | (40,351) | (37,119) | (86) | (79) | 0.0 |
Retained earnings | 339,610 | 311,754 | 725 | 666 | 8.9 |
| | | | | |
Net equity attributable to parent company shareholders | 530,278 | 505,655 | 1,133 | 1,080 | 4.9 |
Minority interest | 112,920 | 109,419 | 241 | 234 | 3.2 |
Total equity | 643,198 | 615,074 | 1,374 | 1,314 | 4.6 |
Total equity and liabilities | 1,138,695 | 1,151,689 | 2,432 | 2,460 | (1.1) |
|
OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION | | | | | |
|
Total financial debt | 244,024 | 232,967 | 521 | 498 | 4.7% |
|
Net debt(2) | 92,147 | 81,353 | 197 | 174 | 0.1 |
|
Liquidity ratio | 2.12 | 1.88 | | | |
Financial Debt / Capitalization | 0.28 | 0.27 | | | |
Net debt / EBITDA(3) | 0.43 | 0.39 | | | |
(1) Exchange rate: US$1.00 = CLP 468.15 | | | | | |
(2) Total financial debt minus cash & cash equivalents | | | | | |
(3) Last 12 months of EBITDA. | | | | | |
19
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
(United Breweries Company, Inc.)
| |
| /s/ Ricardo Reyes |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| |
Date: August 04, 2011