UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
COMPANIA CERVECERIAS UNIDAS S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
UNITED BREWERIES COMPANY, INC.
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)
Republic of Chile
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Vitacura 2670, 23rdfloor, Santiago, Chile
(Address of principal executive offices)
_________________________________________
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-FXForm 40-F ___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes ___ NoX
CCU REPORTS CONSOLIDATED FIRST QUARTER 2011 RESULTS(1)
FIRST QUARTER Net sales up 13.4%, EBIT(2) increases 37.7%, EBITDA(3) up 32.7% Net profit(4) up 35.2% to CLP 142.9 per share |
FIRST QUARTER BEFORE NON RECURRING ITEMS (NRI) EBIT(2) before NRI increases 11.2%, EBITDA(3) before NRI up10.9% Net profit(4) before NRI up 11.2% to CLP 117.6 per share |
(Santiago, Chile, May 4, 2011)-- CCU announced today its consolidated financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2011. (5)
COMMENTS FROM THE CEO |
We are pleased with CCU’s first quarter performance. The consolidated volumes grew 6.1% to 5.0 million hectoliters, with the contribution of the following segments: Beer Chile grew 9.6%, Beer Argentina increased 6.9%, Spirits was up 6.6% and Non alcoholic beverages grew 3.7%, which all together more than compensated the 1.7% decrease in Wine volume.
The Net profit(4) in Q1’11 increased 35.2%, mainly due to 11.2% higher EBIT(2) before NRI and to the recognition of a positive CLP 12,683 million one time effect, at EBIT level, of the settlement of the insurance claim related with the damages caused by the February 2010 earthquake, partially offset by higher income tax. This NRI is a compensation for the lost results in 2010 attributable to the earthquake effects on our operations. As of the date of this report, the Company had received in cash, from the insurance companies, the total amount of CLP 39,549 million and has an account receivable for the remaining CLP 3,929 million.
(1)Statements made in this press release that relate to CCU’s future performance or financial results are forward-looking statements, which involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to materially differ. We undertake no obligation to update any of these statements. Persons reading this press release are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These statements should be taken in conjunction with the additional information about risk and uncertainties set forth in CCU’s annual report on Form 20-F filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission and in the annual report submitted to the SVS and available in our web page.
(2)EBIT stands for Earnings Before Interest and Taxes, and corresponds to profit before Taxes, Interests, Results of indexed units, Share of profits of associates and joint ventures and profits/(losses) on exchange rate differences.
(3)EBITDA represents EBIT plus depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a calculation based on IFRS principles. For more detail, please see full note before Exhibits.
(4)Net profit attributable to parent company shareholders as per IFRS.
(5)All the comments below refers to Q1’11 figures compared to Q1’10, under IFRS.
1 |
The 11.2% EBIT before NRI increase to CLP 53,212 million is the result of the 13.4% increase in Net sales partially offset by 16.7% higher Cost of goods sold (COGS) and 12.1% increase in marketing, sales, distribution and administrative expenses (MSD&A). The recognition of the positive insurance settlement effect brings the EBIT increase to 37.7% reaching CLP 65,896 million.
The EBITDA before NRI increased 10.9% to CLP 64,732 million and with the NRI grew 32.7%. The EBITDA margin varied from 27.3% in Q1’10 to 26.7% in Q1’11 or to 32.0% after NRI.
Reflecting on 2011, we are facing a scenario with three variables which can affect negatively our margins: (1) the raise in the raw material prices, (2) the higher cost of fuel and (3) the energy cost increase. In order to compensate the adverse scenario we have in place a contingency plan consisting in (a) to generate costs and expenses savings throughout the organization and (b) to anticipate price increases which were already planned for a later date in the year. Although there is uncertainty if the contingency plan will compensate in full the adverse effects, we expect to bridge a significant part of the negative effects on the margins.
2 |
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT HIGHLIGHTS(Exhibit 1) |
NET SALES
Q1’11 Total Net sales increased 13.4% to CLP 242,263 million as a result of 6.1% higher consolidated volumes and 6.9% higher average price. Volumes increased in almost all our segments, contributing to the consolidated volume growth: our Beer segment in Chile achieved a 9.6% larger volume, Beer Argentina was up by 6.9%, Spirits was 6.6% higher, the Non-alcoholic beverages increased 3.7%, more than compensating 1.7% lower volume in Wine. The higher average price is mainly explained by 12.9% increase in the average price of Beer in Argentina, 9.5% increase in Wine average price, 6.5% in Non-alcoholic beverages prices, 3.2% price increase in Beer Chile and 3.1% in Spirits. Prices increased mainly due to more premium products in the mix and to price adjustments to compensate higher cost of raw material, energy and fuel.
* Percentage calculations exclude “Other/Eliminations”
Net sales by segment
FIRST QUARTER (million CLP) | |||||
2011 | 2010 | % Chg. | |||
Beer Chile | 86,774 | 35.8% | 77,292 | 36.2% | 12.3% |
Beer Argentina | 52,072 | 21.5% | 44,546 | 20.8% | 16.9% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 66,118 | 27.3% | 59,734 | 28.0% | 10.7% |
Wine | 28,437 | 11.7% | 26,430 | 12.4% | 7.6% |
Spirits | 8,841 | 3.6% | 7,808 | 3.7% | 13.2% |
Other/Eliminations | 21 | 0.0% | -2,158 | -1.0% | - |
TOTAL | 242,263 | 100.0% | 213,652 | 100.0% | 13.4% |
3 |
GROSS PROFIT
Q1’11 Increased10.9% to CLP134,728 million as a result of13.4% higher Net sales, partially offset by16.7% higher COGS which amounted to CLP107,535 million. As a percentage of Net sales, COGS increased from43.1% in Q1’10 to44.4% in Q1’11. Consequently, the Gross profit, as a percentage of Net sales, decreased from56.9% in Q1’10 to55.6% this quarter.
EBIT
Q1’11 Increased37.7% to CLP65,896 million due to the higher Gross profit and due to the CLP 12,683 million positive effect of the insurance settlement, partially offset by higher MSD&A expenses, which increased in Q1’11 by12.1%, to CLP82,660 million. MSD&A expenses, as a percentage of Net sales decreased from34.5% in Q1’10 to34.1% in Q1’11. The consolidated EBIT margin increased from22.4% in Q1’10 to27.2% in Q1’11. Isolating the NRI positive effect of the insurance settlement, the consolidated EBIT margin decreased from 22.4% in Q1’10 to 22.0% in Q1’11.
* Percentage calculations exclude “Other/Eliminations”
EBIT and EBIT margin by segment
FIRST QUARTER | |||||
EBIT (million CLP) | EBIT margin | ||||
2011 | 2010 | %Chg | 2011 | 2010 | |
Beer Chile | 34,148 | 24,623 | 38.7% | 39.4% | 31.9% |
Beer Argentina | 9,856 | 9,211 | 7.0% | 18.9% | 20.7% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 12,769 | 10,105 | 26.4% | 19.3% | 16.9% |
Wine | 6,913 | 1,359 | 408.7% | 24.3% | 5.1% |
Spirits | 1,266 | 1,051 | 20.5% | 14.3% | 13.5% |
Other/Eliminations | 944 | 1,505 | -37.3% | - | - |
TOTAL | 65,896 | 47,854 | 37.7% | 27.2% | 22.4% |
4 |
EBITDA
Q1’11 Increased32.7%, to CLP77,415million and the consolidated EBITDA margin varied from27.3% in Q1’10 to32.0% in Q1’11 or to 26.7% excluding the NRI.
* Percentage calculations exclude “Other/Eliminations”
EBITDA and EBITDA margin by segment
FIRST QUARTER | |||||
EBITDA (million CLP) | EBITDA margin | ||||
2011 | 2010 | % Chg | 2011 | 2010 | |
Beer Chile | 38,019 | 28,111 | 35.2% | 43.8% | 36.4% |
Beer Argentina | 11,123 | 10,368 | 7.3% | 21.4% | 23.3% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 15,305 | 12,364 | 23.8% | 23.1% | 20.7% |
Wine | 8,465 | 2,907 | 191.1% | 29.8% | 11.0% |
Spirits | 1,655 | 1,465 | 13.0% | 18.7% | 18.8% |
Other/Eliminations | 2,847 | 3,138 | -9.3% | - | - |
TOTAL | 77,415 | 58,354 | 32.7% | 32.0% | 27.3% |
ALL OTHER
Q1’11 In All other we include the following: Net financing expenses, Share of profits of associates and joint ventures, Exchange rate differences, Result of indexed units and Other gains/(losses). The total variation of these accounts, when compared to the same quarter last year, is a lower result of CLP 314 million mainly explained by:
· Results of indexed units,which worsened CLP 600 million, mainly due to a 0.6% increase of the UF value in Q1’11 compared with a 0.3% UF variation in Q1’10 . (The UF is a monetary unit indexed to the CPI variation).
5 |
· Other gains/(losses) and Exchange rate differences,which decreased CLP 1,088 million mainly due to lower gains related to hedges.
All of the above was partially compensated by:
· Share of profits of associates and joint ventures, which increased CLP 801 million mainly due to higher Net profit in Foods Compañía de Alimentos CCU S.A. explained by the effect of the insurance claim settlement.
· Net financing expenses, which decreased CLP573 million, from a net expense of CLP2,426 million to CLP1,853 million as a result of lower financial net liabilities.
INCOME TAX
Q1’11 Income tax increased CLP3,823 million mostly due to higher income before taxes and to the increase, in Chile, of the income tax rate from 17% to 20% for the fiscal year 2011.The income tax rate was increased in order to fund the reconstruction of public works after the 2010 earthquake: from 17% to 20% in 2011, to 18.5% in 2012 and back to 17% from 2013 and subsequent years.
MINORITY INTEREST
Q1’11 Increased CLP 2,058 million to CLP4,321 million mostly due to the higher results of Viña San Pedro Tarapaca S.A. explained mainly by the effect of the insurance claim settlement.
NET PROFIT
Q1’11 Increased CLP11,847 million to CLP45,515 million due mostly to higher EBIT partially compensated by lower All other result, higher Minority interest and higher Income tax.
6 |
2010 EARTHQUAKE SETTLEMENT |
As of March 31 CCU had settled the insurance claims related to the 2010 earthquake which generated the positive non recurring effect of CLP 12,683 million, at EBIT level, to make up for the operational losses caused by the natural disaster. The compensation has the following breakdown:
1. The compensation for destroyed finished product at sales value, business interruption damages, and cost and expenses incurred in order setting and cleaning amounted to CLP 7,875 millions.
2. The compensation corresponding to machinery and equipment write offs valued at replacement cost, amounted to CLP 4,808 million.
As of the date of the of this report, the Company had received in cash the total amount of CLP 39,549 million and has an account receivable for the remaining CLP 3,929 million.
The following schedules show the EBIT/EBITDA and EBIT/EBITDA margins, both, before NRI to facilitate the comparison between quarters:
FIRST QUARTER | |||||
EBIT before NRI (million CLP) | EBIT margin before NRI | ||||
2011 | 2010 | % Chg | 2011 | 2010 | |
Beer Chile | 28,819 | 24,623 | 17.0% | 33.2% | 31.9% |
Beer Argentina | 9,856 | 9,211 | 7.0% | 18.9% | 20.7% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 11,533 | 10,105 | 14.1% | 17.4% | 16.9% |
Wine | 1,052 | 1,359 | -22.6% | 3.7% | 5.1% |
Spirits | 959 | 1,051 | -8.7% | 10.8% | 13.5% |
Other/Eliminations | 993 | 1,505 | -34.0% | - | - |
TOTAL | 53,212 | 47,854 | 11.2% | 22.0% | 22.4% |
FIRST QUARTER | |||||
EBITDA before NRI (million CLP) | EBITDA margin before NRI | ||||
2011 | 2010 | % Chg | 2011 | 2010 | |
Beer Chile | 32,690 | 28,111 | 16.3% | 37.7% | 36.4% |
Beer Argentina | 11,123 | 10,368 | 7.3% | 21.4% | 23.3% |
Non-alcoholic beverages | 14,070 | 12,364 | 13.8% | 21.3% | 20.7% |
Wine | 2,604 | 2,907 | -10.4% | 9.2% | 11.0% |
Spirits | 1,348 | 1,465 | -8.0% | 15.2% | 18.8% |
Other/Eliminations | 2,896 | 3,138 | -7.7% | - | - |
TOTAL | 64,732 | 58,354 | 10.9% | 26.7% | 27.3% |
7 |
BUSINESS UNITS HIGHLIGHTS(Exhibit 2) |
Business segments are reflected in the same way that each Strategic Business Unit (SBU) is managed. Corporate shared services and distribution and logistics expenses have been allocated to each SBU based on Service Level Agreements. The non-allocated corporate overhead expenses, the result of the logistics subsidiary and the Cider business in Argentina are included in “Other/Eliminations”.
BEER CHILE |
Net sales increased 12.3% to CLP 86,774 million as a result of 9.6% higher sales volume and 3.2% higher average prices.
EBIT increased 38.7% to CLP 34,148 million mainly due to higher Net sales and the CLP 5,329 million one time positive effect of the settlement, partially offset by higher COGS and higher MSD&A expenses. COGS increased 12.5% to CLP 33,547 million mainly due to higher volumes and higher unit costs (+2.7%). The higher cost of energy had a relevant impact on manufacturing costs. As a percentage of Net sales, COGS was flat at 38.7%. The MSD&A expenses increased6.2% to CLP24,433 million due mostly to higher distribution expenses related to fuel price increases. As a percentage of Net sales, MSD&A decreased from 29.8% to 28.2%. EBIT before NRI increased 17.0% to CLP 28,819 million.
EBITDA increased 35.2% to CLP 38,019 million which considers the insurance settlement. EBITDA before NRI increased 16.3% to CLP 32,690 million and the EBITDA margin increased from 36.4% in Q1’10 to 37.7% in Q1’11 or to 43.8% considering the one time insurance effect.
Comments The volume growth of 9.6% contrasts with the 7.7% drop experienced in the same period in 2010 as a consequence of the earthquake effects on the brewery in Santiago. The damages caused an inevitable supply shortage which was gradually normalized. The higher average price is mainly due to a higher incidence of premium products and one way package products in the sales mix, and to price increases to compensate the higher production and distribution costs. In August 2010 the price of premium beer and one way packaging was adjusted 6% on average, and given the actual COGS pressure, we will continue to adjust prices to protect the margins.
BEER ARGENTINA |
Net sales measured in Chilean pesos increased 16.9% to CLP 52,072 million, as a result of 6.9% higher sales volumes and 12.9% higher average prices.
8 |
EBIT measured in Chilean pesos increased 7.0% to CLP 9,856 million in Q1’11, as a consequence of higher Net sales, partially compensated by higher COGS and MSD&A. COGS increased9.2%, to CLP19,617 million this quarter mainly due to higher prices of raw materials and salary pressures. As a percentage of Net sales, COGS decreased from40.3% to37.7% in Q1’11. MSD&A expenses increased30.3% from CLP17,401 million to CLP22,673 million due to inflationary pressures, unionization of sales personnel and distributors and sales taxes. As a percentage of Net sales, MSD&A expenses increased from39.1% to43.5%.
EBITDA increased7.3% or CLP755 million to CLP11,123 million this quarter and the EBITDA margin decreased from23.3% to21.4%.
Comments Despite of cost and expenses pressures we are satisfied with Beer Argentina results. Sales prices were adjusted during February 2011. Total volume grew 6.9% on average, where international brands and exports to third countries made considerable progress. The results in Chilean pesos are affected by the depreciation of the Argentinean peso (4.6%) and the appreciation of the Chilean peso (7.2%), both vis a vis the dollar. The results in dollars are as follows: EBIT increased 14.6% and EBITDA increased 14.9%, while the EBITDA margin decreased from 25% to 22.8%.
With regards to the cider business we acquired in December 2010, the volumes grew 6.1% with respect to Q1’10, the EBITDA was negative USD1.2 million which is consistent with a highly seasonal business. The cider business in Argentina has its peak towards year end when most of the EBITDA is generated. In 2010 the EBITDA was USD4million. During 2011 the cider business result will be shown in the “Other/eliminations” segment.
NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES |
Net sales increased10.7% to CLP66,118 million due to higher volumes of 3.7% and 6.5% increase in the average price.
EBIT increased26.4% to CLP12,769 million mainly due to higher Net sales and the CLP 1,236 million positive effect of the insurance settlement. The positive variations were partially compensated by higher COGS and higher MSD&A expenses. COGS increased18.4% to CLP32,188 million mainly due to price increases in raw material such as sugar, fruit pulp and resin which were not fully compensated by the appreciation of the Chilean peso. Also, higher energy costs and −to a lesser extent− the operation this year of the Antofagasta plant, had an impact on manufacturing costs. COGS, as a percentage of Net sales, increased from 45.5% to 48.7%. MSD&A increased3.6% to CLP23,313million mainly due to higher distribution, marketing expenses and depreciation. Consequently, as a percentage of Net sales, MSD&A decreased from37.7% to35.3%. EBIT before NRI increased14.1% to CLP11,533million.
EBITDA increased 23.8% to CLP 15,305 million which considers the insurance settlement positive effect. EBITDA before NRI increased13.8% to CLP14,070 million andthe EBITDA margin increased from 20.7% in Q1’10 to21.3% in Q1’11,or to 23.1%considering the one time insurance effect.
9 |
CommentsVolumes had a positive performance during the quarter: soft drinks increased 2.8%, nectars 16.9%, and water 0.3%. The soft drinks category “Light” or Diet products, Functional products and Ice Tea volumes grew at double-digit rates. Water volume grew in 2011 despite the challenging 14.5% increase in Q1’10 because of tap water shortage caused by the earthquake in some regions last year. The segment’s average price increased 6.5% due to the 3% price increase in all categories on November 2010 and 1% in soft drinks at the beginning of April 2011. The purpose of these price actions is to mitigate raw materials, energy and fuel price raise.
WINE |
Net sales increased7.6% to CLP28,437 million due to an increase of 9.5% in the average price in CLP partially offset by a decrease in volume of1.7%. The Chile domestic volume decreased1.1%, Chile exports increased0.8% and Argentina’s volume decreased24.2%. The 23.7% price increase in the domestic market is explained by price adjustments during 2010 and higher participation of bottled wine in the sale’s mix. The Chile exports prices in Chilean pesos increased 2.9%, despite of the appreciation of the Chilean peso, due to higher prices in the export markets. In dollar terms, the Chile export prices were 14% higher than in the same period last year, and the Argentine average price considering both domestic sales and exports in dollars terms, increased 21%.
EBIT increased 408.7% to CLP 6,913 million mainly due to the CLP 5,861 million one time positive effect of the settlement of the insurance claim, partially offset by higher COGS and MSD&A expenses. COGS increased11.2% from CLP16,700 million to CLP18,574 million due to the higher cost of wine. As a percentage of Net sales, COGS increased from63.2% to65.3%. MSD&A increased6.5% to CLP8,908 million mainly due to marketing and distribution expenses. As a percentage of Net sales, MSD&A decreased from31.6% to31.3%. EBIT before NRI decreased22.6% from CLP1,359 million to CLP1,052 million in Q1’11, mainly due to the 7% appreciation of the Chilean peso vs. the US dollar.
EBITDA increased 191.1% to CLP 8,465 million which considers the insurance settlement positive effect. EBITDA before NRI decreased10.4% to CLP2,604 million and the EBITDA margin before NRI varied from11.0% in Q1’10 to9.2% in Q1’11, or to 29.8%considering the one time insurance effect.
Comments The higher cost of wine (as raw material) that has been affecting the industry due to last year’s vintage and to the wine lost during the earthquake, has continued affecting the COGS. Additionally, the strengthening of the Chilean currency vis a vis the foreign currencies in the company’s destination markets has affected our revenues. In order to compensate this, the company has been improving the sales mix to more premium, and adjusting prices in all of our segments.
10 |
SPIRITS |
Net sales increased13.2% to CLP8,841milliondue to 6.6% highervolume and 3.1% higher average prices.
EBIT increased 20.5% to CLP 1,266 million mainly due to higher Net sales and the CLP 307 million one time positive effect of the settlement of the insurance claim, partially offset by higher COGS and higher MSD&A expenses. COGS increased15.2% from CLP4,015 million to CLP4,626 million due to higher raw material costs and finished product inventory depletion. COGS as a percentage of Net sales increased from51.4% to52.3%. MSD&A increased18.8% to CLP3,260 million, mostly due to higher marketing and personnel expenses. As a percentage of Net sales, MSD&A increased from35.1% to36.9%. EBIT before NRI decreased8.7% from CLP1,051 million to CLP959 million.
EBITDA increased 13.0% to CLP 1,655 million which considers the insurance settlement positive effect. EBITDA before NRI decreased8.0% from CLP1,465 million to CLP1,348 million, and the EBITDA margin decreased from18.8% in Q1’10 to15.2% in Q1’11, or to 18.7% considering the one time insurance effect.
CommentsThe higher volume, as well as the higher average price, is explained by pisco products volume growth such as Mistral (16%), Mistral Ice Blend (15%) and rum volume (13%), mainly the Cabo Viejo brand.
(The exhibits to follow, figures have been rounded and may not sum exactly the totals shown.)
Note: EBITDA represents EBIT plus depreciation and amortization. EBITDA is not a calculation based on generally accepted accounting principles. The amounts in the EBITDA calculation, however, are derived from amounts included in the historical statements of income data. EBITDA is presented as supplemental information because management believes that EBITDA is useful in assessing the Company’s operations. EBITDA is useful in evaluating the operating performance compared to that of other companies, as the calculation of EBITDA eliminates the effects of financing, income taxes and the accounting of capital spending, which items may vary for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. When analyzing the operating performance, however, investors should use EBITDA in addition to, not as an alternative for, EBIT and net income. Investors should also note that CCU’s presentation of EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies
11 |
Exhibit 1: Income Statement (Three Months Ended March 31, 2011) | |||||
Q1 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011(1) | 2010(1) | VARIANCE % |
(CLP million) | (CLP million) | (US$ million) | (US$ million) | ||
Core revenue | 237,911 | 209,669 | 496.2 | 437.3 | 13.5 |
Other revenue | 4,352 | 3,983 | 9.1 | 8.3 | 9.3 |
Interco sales revenue | (0) | 0 | (0.0) | 0.0 | - |
Net sales | 242,263 | 213,652 | 505.3 | 445.6 | 13.4 |
Cost of goods sold | (107,535) | (92,165) | (224.3) | (192.2) | 16.7 |
% of net sales | 44.4 | 43.1 | 44.4 | 43.1 | |
Gross profit | 134,728 | 121,487 | 281.0 | 253.4 | 10.9 |
MSD&A(2) | (82,660) | (73,740) | (172.4) | (153.8) | 12.1 |
% of net sales | 34.1 | 34.5 | 34.1 | 34.5 | |
Other operating income/(expenses) | 1,144 | 106 | 2.4 | 0.2 | n/a |
EBIT before NRI | 53,212 | 47,854 | 111.0 | 99.8 | 11.2 |
% of net sales | 22.0 | 22.4 | 22.0 | 22.4 | |
NRI | 12,683 | 0 | 26.5 | 0.0 | - |
EBIT | 65,896 | 47,854 | 137.4 | 99.8 | 37.7 |
% of net sales | 27.2 | 22.4 | 27.2 | 22.4 | |
Net financing expenses | (1,853) | (2,426) | (3.9) | (5.1) | (23.6) |
Share of profits of associates and joint ventures | 713 | (88) | 1.5 | (0.2) | n/a |
Exchange rate differences | 121 | 459 | 0.3 | 1.0 | (73.6) |
Results of indexed units | (1,149) | (549) | (2.4) | (1.1) | 109.2 |
Other gains/(losses) | 82 | 832 | 0.2 | 1.7 | (90.2) |
INCOME/(LOSS) BEFORE TAXES | 63,809 | 46,081 | 106.6 | 96.1 | 38.5 |
Income tax | (13,973) | (10,150) | (29.1) | (21.2) | 37.7 |
NET PROFIT FOR THE PERIOD | 49,835 | 35,931 | 77.5 | 74.9 | 38.7 |
NET PROFIT before NRI ATTRIBUTABLE TO: | |||||
PARENT COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS | 37,455 | 33,668 | 78.1 | 70.2 | 11.2 |
NET PROFIT ATTRIBUTABLE TO: | |||||
PARENT COMPANY SHAREHOLDERS | 45,515 | 33,668 | 68.5 | 70.2 | 35.2 |
MINORITY INTEREST | 4,321 | 2,263 | 9.0 | 4.7 | 90.9 |
Net profit attributable to Parent Company Shareholders as % of net sales | 18.8 | 15.8 | 13.6 | 15.8 | |
Earnings per share | 142.9 | 105.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 35.2 |
Earnings per ADR | 714.5 | 528.5 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 35.2 |
EBITDA(3)before NRI | 64,732 | 58,354 | 135.0 | 121.7 | 10.9 |
% of net sales | 26.7 | 27.3 | 26.7 | 27.3 | |
EBITDA(3) | 77,415 | 58,354 | 161.5 | 121.7 | 32.7 |
% of net sales | 32.0 | 27.3 | 32.0 | 27.3 | |
OTHER INFORMATION | |||||
Number of shares | 318,502,872 | 318,502,872 | 318,502,872 | 318,502,872 | |
Shares per ADR | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
DEPRECIATION | 11,519 | 10,500 | 24.0 | 21.9 | 9.7 |
Capital Expenditures | 12,877 | 11,324 | 26.9 | 23.6 | 13.7 |
(1) Exchange rate: US$1.00 = CLP 468.01 | |||||
(2) MSD&A refers to Marketing selling, distribution and administrative expenses | |||||
(3) Please see full note in page before exhibits |
12 |
Exhibit 2: Segment Information - Three Months March 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||
Q1 | Beer Chile | Beer Argentina | Non-Alcoholic | Wines | Spirits | Other/eliminations | Total | |||||||
(CLP million) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 |
Core revenue | 85,899 | 75,943 | 51,121 | 42,390 | 64,693 | 58,539 | 27,015 | 25,099 | 8,460 | 7,699 | 722 | 0 | 237,911 | 209,669 |
Other revenue | 805 | 701 | 933 | 855 | 300 | 263 | 1,419 | 1,329 | 131 | 107 | 765 | 729 | 4,352 | 3,983 |
Interco sales revenue | 69 | 648 | 18 | 1,302 | 1,125 | 932 | 3 | 2 | 251 | 2 | (1,466) | (2,886) | (0) | 0 |
Net sales | 86,774 | 77,292 | 52,072 | 44,546 | 66,118 | 59,734 | 28,437 | 26,430 | 8,841 | 7,808 | 21 | (2,158) | 242,263 | 213,652 |
variance % | 12.3 | 16.9 | 10.7 | 7.6 | 13.2 | 13.4 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold | (33,547) | (29,816) | (19,617) | (17,957) | (32,188) | (27,176) | (18,574) | (16,700) | (4,626) | (4,015) | 1,018 | 3,499 | (107,535) | (92,165) |
% of net sales | 38.7 | 38.6 | 37.7 | 40.3 | 48.7 | 45.5 | 65.3 | 63.2 | 52.3 | 51.4 | 44.4 | 43.1 | ||
Gross profit | 53,227 | 47,476 | 32,454 | 26,589 | 33,929 | 32,558 | 9,864 | 9,730 | 4,215 | 3,793 | 1,039 | 1,342 | 134,728 | 121,487 |
MSD&A(1) | (24,433) | (23,015) | (22,673) | (17,401) | (23,313) | (22,513) | (8,908) | (8,362) | (3,260) | (2,743) | (72) | 295 | (82,660) | (73,740) |
% of net sales | 28.2 | 29.8 | 43.5 | 39.1 | 35.3 | 37.7 | 31.3 | 31.6 | 36.9 | 35.1 | 34.1 | 34.5 | ||
Other operating income/(expenses) | 26 | 162 | 74 | 23 | 917 | 60 | 96 | (9) | 5 | 1 | 26 | (132) | 1,144 | 106 |
EBIT before NRI(2) | 28,819 | 24,623 | 9,856 | 9,211 | 11,533 | 10,105 | 1,052 | 1,359 | 959 | 1,051 | 993 | 1,505 | 53,212 | 47,854 |
variance % | 17.0 | 7.0 | 14.1 | -22.6 | -8.7 | 11.2 | ||||||||
% of net sales | 33.2 | 31.9 | 18.9 | 20.7 | 17.4 | 16.9 | 3.7 | 5.1 | 10.8 | 13.5 | 22.0 | 22.4 | ||
NRI | 5,329 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,236 | 0 | 5,861 | 0 | 307 | 0 | (49) | 0 | 12,683 | 0 |
EBIT | 34,148 | 24,623 | 9,856 | 9,211 | 12,769 | 10,105 | 6,913 | 1,359 | 1,266 | 1,051 | 944 | 1,505 | 65,896 | 47,854 |
variance % | 38.7 | 7.0 | 26.4 | 408.7 | 20.5 | -37.3 | 37.7 | |||||||
% of net sales | 39.4 | 31.9 | 18.9 | 20.7 | 19.3 | 16.9 | 24.3 | 5.1 | 14.3 | 13.5 | 27.2 | 22.4 | ||
EBITDA before NRI(2) | 32,690 | 28,111 | 11,123 | 10,368 | 14,070 | 12,364 | 2,604 | 2,907 | 1,348 | 1,465 | 2,896 | 3,138 | 64,732 | 58,354 |
variance % | 16.3 | 7.3 | 13.8 | -10.4 | -8.0 | -7.7 | 10.9 | |||||||
% of net sales | 37.7 | 36.4 | 21.4 | 23.3 | 21.3 | 20.7 | 9.2 | 11.0 | 15.2 | 18.8 | 26.7 | 27.3 | ||
EBITDA | 38,019 | 28,111 | 11,123 | 10,368 | 15,305 | 12,364 | 8,465 | 2,907 | 1,655 | 1,465 | 2,847 | 3,138 | 77,415 | 58,354 |
variance % | 35.2 | 7.3 | 23.8 | 191.1 | 13.0 | -9.3 | 32.7 | |||||||
% of net sales | 43.8 | 36.4 | 21.4 | 23.3 | 23.1 | 20.7 | 29.8 | 11.0 | 18.7 | 18.8 | 32.0 | 27.3 | ||
Q1 | Beer Chile | Beer Argentina(3) | Non- alcoholic(4) | Wine(5) | Spirits | Other/eliminations | Total | |||||||
VOLUMES (HL) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 |
TOTAL SEGMENT | 1,523,269 | 1,390,300 | 1,264,028 | 1,182,966 | 1,881,629 | 1,813,730 | 251,352 | 255,827 | 43,354 | 40,667 | 7,110 | - | 4,970,743 | 4,683,490 |
variance % | 9.6 | 6.9 | 3.7 | -1.7 | 6.6 | - | 6.1 | |||||||
SOFT DRINKS | CHILE DOMESTIC | |||||||||||||
1,205,854 | 1,173,239 | 112,472 | 113,698 | |||||||||||
variance % | 2.8 | -1.1 | ||||||||||||
NECTAR | CHILE EXPORTS | |||||||||||||
233,838 | 200,028 | 125,401 | 124,351 | |||||||||||
variance % | 16.9 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
WATER | ARGENTINA | |||||||||||||
441,937 | 440,462 | 13,480 | 17,779 | |||||||||||
variance % | 0.3 | -24.2 | ||||||||||||
(1)MSD&A refers to Marketing selling, distribution and administrative expenses | ||||||||||||||
(2)NRI refers to Non-recurring items | ||||||||||||||
(3)Excludes exports to Chile of 2,904 Hl and 45,604 Hl in 2011 and 2010 respectively | ||||||||||||||
(4)Includes softdrink (sofdrink, tea , sports and energetic drinks) , nectars and water (purified and mineral) | ||||||||||||||
(5)Excludes bulk wine of 18,791Hl and 15,648 Hl in 2011 and 2010 respectively | ||||||||||||||
Q1 | Beer Chile | Beer Argentina | Non-Alcoholic | Wines | Spirits | Other/eliminations | Total | |||||||
AVE. PRICES (CLP/Hl) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 |
SEGMENT AVE. PRICE | 56,391 | 54,623 | 40,443 | 35,833 | 34,381 | 32,275 | 107,478 | 98,111 | 195,129 | 189,313 | 100,887 | 47,861 | 44,768 | |
variance % | 3.2 | 12.9 | 6.5 | 9.5 | 3.1 | - | 6.9 | |||||||
SOFT DRINKS | CHILE DOMESTIC | |||||||||||||
34,267 | 32,181 | 81,160 | 65,587 | |||||||||||
variance % | 6.5 | 23.7 | ||||||||||||
NECTAR | CHILE EXPORTS | |||||||||||||
46,346 | 44,523 | 126,410 | 122,801 | |||||||||||
variance % | 4.1 | 2.9 | ||||||||||||
WATER | ARGENTINA | |||||||||||||
28,363 | 26,964 | 150,954 | 133,414 | |||||||||||
variance % | 5.2 | 13.1 | ||||||||||||
13 |
Exhibit 3: Balance Sheet | ||||||
March 31 | December 31 | March 31 | December 31 | % | ||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | Change | ||
ASSETS | (CLP million) | (CLP million) | (US$ million)(1) | (US$ million)(1) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | 184,761 | 151,614 | 385 | 316 | 21.9% | |
Other current assets | 292,044 | 294,668 | 609 | 615 | -0.9% | |
Total current assets | 476,804 | 446,282 | 994 | 931 | 6.8% | |
PP&E (net) | 520,780 | 508,162 | 1,086 | 1,060 | 2.5% | |
Other non current assets | 193,941 | 197,245 | 404 | 411 | (1.7)% | |
Total non current assets | 714,721 | 705,407 | 1,491 | 1,471 | 1.3% | |
Total assets | 1,191,525 | 1,151,689 | 2,485 | 2,402 | 3.5% | |
LIABILITIES | ||||||
Loans and other liabilities | 12,249 | 12,822 | 26 | 27 | (4.5)% | |
Other liabilities | 229,008 | 224,136 | 478 | 467 | 2.2% | |
Total current liabilities | 241,257 | 236,958 | 503 | 494 | 0.0 | |
Loans and other liabilities | 221,443 | 220,145 | 462 | 459 | 0.6% | |
Other liabilities | 82,921 | 79,512 | 173 | 166 | 4.3% | |
Total non current liabilities | 304,364 | 299,657 | 635 | 625 | 1.6% | |
Total Liabilities | 545,621 | 536,615 | 1,138 | 1,119 | 1.7% | |
EQUITY | ||||||
Paid-in capital | 231,020 | 231,020 | 482 | 482 | 0.0% | |
Other reserves | (37,482) | (37,119) | (78) | (77) | 0.0% | |
Retained earnings | 334,511 | 311,754 | 698 | 650 | 7.3% | |
Net equity attributable to parent company shareholders | 528,049 | 505,655 | 1,101 | 1,055 | 4.4% | |
Minority interest | 117,856 | 109,419 | 246 | 228 | 0.1 | |
Total equity | 645,904 | 615,074 | 1,347 | 1,283 | 5.0% | |
Total equity and liabilities | 1,191,525 | 1,151,689 | 2,485 | 2,402 | 3.5% | |
OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||
Total financial debt | 233,692 | 232,967 | 487 | 486 | 0.3% | |
Net debt(2) | 48,931 | 81,353 | 102 | 170 | (39.9)% | |
Liquidity ratio | 1.98 | 1.88 | ||||
Financial Debt / Capitalization | 0.27 | 0.27 | ||||
Net debt / EBITDA(3) | 0.22 | 0.39 | ||||
(1) Exchange rate: US$1.00 = CLP 479.46 | ||||||
(2) Total financial debt minus cash & cash equivalents | ||||||
(3) Last 12 months of EBITDA. |
14
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.
(United Breweries Company, Inc.)
/s/ Ricardo Reyes | |
Chief Financial Officer | |
Date: May 9, 2011