The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates for Board membership suggested by its members and other Board members. Additionally, in selecting nominees for directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will review candidates recommended by stockholders in the same manner and using the same general criteria as candidates recruited by the committee and/or recommended by the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider whether to nominate any person nominated by a stockholder in accordance with the provisions of GTC’s by-laws relating to stockholder nominations as described in “Deadline for Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations” below.
Once the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has identified a prospective nominee, a subcommittee of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes an initial determination as to whether to conduct a full evaluation of the candidate. This initial determination is based on the information provided to the subcommittee with the recommendation of the prospective candidate, as well as the subcommittee’s own knowledge of the prospective candidate, which may be supplemented by inquiries of the person making the recommendation or others. The preliminary determination is based primarily on the need for additional Board members to fill vacancies or expand the size of the Board and the likelihood that the prospective nominee can satisfy the evaluation factors described below. Based on the recommendation of the subcommittee, the full committee then evaluates the prospective nominee against the standards and qualifications set out in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which include among others:
If the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s internal evaluation is positive, the subcommittee and possibly others will interview the candidate. Upon completion of this evaluation and interview process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes a
recommendation and report to the full Board as to whether the candidate should be nominated by the Board and the Board determines whether to approve the nominee after considering this recommendation and report.
Director Compensation
Director Fees. Our directors who are not employees of GTC receive compensation for their services as directors in the form of an annual retainer of $12,000, payable in quarterly installments. Directors who are GTC employees do not receive compensation for their service as directors. Members of the Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees also receive an annual retainer of $2,000, payable quarterly, and the Chair of each of those committees receives an annual retainer of $3,000, payable quarterly. Members of the Audit Committee receive an annual retainer of $4,000, payable quarterly, and the Chair receives an annual retainer of $6,000, payable quarterly. In addition, each non-employee director receives $1,000 for attendance in person (or $500 for participation by conference call) for each Board meeting and each standing committee meeting other than a standing committee meeting held in conjunction with a Board meeting, plus reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred in attending or otherwise participating in such meetings.
Stock Options. All non-employee directors of GTC are currently eligible to participate in our 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated. The Board of Directors has discretion as to the size, type, and exercisability of awards granted to non-employee directors under the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated.
Certain Relationships and Transactions with Related Parties
Since our initial public offering in 1993, we have entered into several agreements with Genzyme Corporation which are summarized below. In fiscal year 2004, we paid Genzyme an aggregate of approximately $2,919,077 under the research and development agreement, the services agreement and the lease agreement described below. In addition, Mr. Geraghty is an executive employed by Genzyme.
Equity Position. Genzyme is our largest single stockholder, holding 4,924,919 shares of common stock as of March 31, 2005, which represents approximately 10.56% of our then outstanding common stock. Genzyme also holds four common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 145,000, 288,000, 55,833 and 29,491 shares of common stock at prices of $2.84, $4.88, $6.30 and $6.30 per share, respectively, which were the market prices of the common stock at the time the respective Genzyme warrants were issued. The expiration dates of these warrants range from July 2005 through November 2009. All of the shares held by Genzyme (including shares issuable on exercise of Genzyme warrants) are entitled to registration rights. Genzyme owns approximately 11.54% of our common stock on a fully diluted basis.
Stock Buyback. On April 4, 2002, we repurchased 2.82 million shares of our common stock directly from Genzyme which was recorded as treasury stock. We bought the shares for an aggregate
15
consideration of approximately $9.6 million, consisting of approximately $4.8 million in cash and a promissory note to Genzyme for the remaining $4.8 million. Our common stock was valued at $3.385 per share in this transaction, using the simple average of the high and low transaction prices quoted on the NASDAQ National Market on the previous trading day. Genzyme agreed to a 24-month lock-up provision on their remaining 4.92 million shares of common stock, which was released on April 4, 2004. The $4.8 million promissory note bears interest at the LIBOR plus 1% (LIBOR was at 2.51% at January 2, 2005). The principal is payable in two installments: $2.4 million which was due and paid on April 4, 2005 and the remaining $2.4 million which is due on April 4, 2006. This note is collateralized by a subordinated lien on all our assets except intellectual property. In February 2005, we expanded our term loan with GE Capital to allow us to draw down an additional $2.4 million, which was used to refinance the note payment due to Genzyme on April 4, 2005.
Research and Development Agreement. Under our Research and Development Agreement dated May 1, 1993, we and Genzyme each agreed to provide to the other research and development services relating, in the case of GTC, to transgenic production of recombinant proteins and, in the case of Genzyme, to the purification of such proteins. Each company receives payments from the other equal to the performing party’s fully allocated cost of such services, which can be no less than 80% of the annual budgets established by the parties under the agreement on a month-to-month basis, plus, in most cases, a fee equal to 10% of such costs. The agreement expired on December 31, 1998 and the parties are continuing under this agreement on a month-to-month basis. On July 31, 2001, we entered into a services agreement with Genzyme under which Genzyme may perform manufacturing, research and development and regulatory services for our ATryn® program on a cost plus 5% basis. In fiscal year 2004, we purchased $2,390,000 under this arrangement. In June of 2003, we entered into a services agreement under which we provide certain services to Genzyme for which Genzyme paid us a monthly amount based upon a rate we agreed upon with Genzyme. Services to be performed under this June 2003 agreement continued until December 31, 2004.
Lease. Under the Sublease Agreement, we lease certain laboratory, research and office space from Genzyme in exchange for fixed monthly rent payments which approximate the estimated current rental value for such space. In addition, we reimburse Genzyme for our pro rata share of appropriate facilities’ operating costs such as maintenance, cleaning, utilities and real estate taxes. The sublease is automatically renewed each year and renewals are subject to earlier termination of the sublease by either party after the initial five-year term. Under the Sublease Agreement, we made payments for the fiscal year 2004 of $352,000.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No person serving on the Compensation Committee at any time during fiscal year 2004 was a present or former officer or employee of GTC or any of our subsidiaries during that year. During 2004, no executive officer of GTC served as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee (or other board committee performing equivalent functions) of any other entity that had an executive officer serving on our Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.
16
Executive Compensation
The following tables contain information regarding our Named Executive Officers’ compensation during fiscal year 2004:
Summary Compensation Table
| | | | | | | | Long-Term Compensation Awards
| |
---|
| | | | | | Annual Compensation
| |
---|
Name and Position
| | | | Year
| | Salary
| | Bonus
| | Securities Underlying Options
| | All Other Compensation (1)
|
---|
Geoffrey F. Cox
| | | | | 2004 | | | $ | 428,134 | (2) | | $ | 94,100 | | | | 76,000 | | | $ | 6,150 | |
Chairman, Chief Executive | | | | | 2003 | | | | 420,056 | | | | 110,000 | | | | 125,000 | | | | 6,000 | |
Officer and President | | | | | 2002 | | | | 420,055 | | | | 112,420 | | | | 140,000 | | | | 152,434 | (3) |
| John B. Green
| | | | | 2004 | | | | 275,197 | (2) | | | 46,170 | | | | 26,000 | | | | 6,150 | |
Senior Vice President, Chief | | | | | 2003 | | | | 267,255 | | | | 48,519 | | | | 50,000 | | | | 6,000 | |
Financial Officer and Treasurer | | | | | 2002 | | | | 257,005 | | | | 50,321 | | | | 50,000 | | | | 6,000 | |
| Gregory F. Liposky(4)
| | | | | 2004 | | | | 253,662 | (5) | | | 44,370 | | | | 36,000 | | | | 6,150 | |
Senior Vice President, Operations | | | | | 2003 | | | | 227,894 | | | | 44,643 | | | | 45,000 | | | | 6,000 | |
| | | | | 2002 | | | | 220,022 | | | | 41,976 | | | | 50,000 | | | | 6,000 | |
| Harry M. Meade
| | | | | 2004 | | | | 268,053 | (2) | | | 44,184 | | | | 26,000 | | | | 5,125 | |
Senior Vice President, Research | | | | | 2003 | | | | 260,784 | | | | 44,105 | | | | 45,000 | | | | 6,000 | |
and Development | | | | | 2002 | | | | 249,482 | | | | 47,068 | | | | 50,000 | | | | 6,000 | |
| Daniel S. Woloshen(4)
| | | | | 2004 | | | | 233,412 | (2) | | | 35,724 | | | | 26,000 | | | | 6,150 | |
Senior Vice President and General | | | | | 2003 | | | | 229,000 | | | | 42,800 | | | | 45,000 | | | | 6,000 | |
Counsel | | | | | 2002 | | | | 219,023 | | | | 41,347 | | | | 35,000 | | | | 6,000 | |
(1) | | Unless otherwise noted, the amounts in this column represent our contributions to GTC’s 401(k) plan on behalf of the Named Executive Officer. |
(2) | | Reflects salary paid over a 53-week fiscal year. The annual salary for the Named Executive Officer did not increase from 2003 to 2004. |
(3) | | Includes reimbursement of $149,434 for relocation expenses. |
(4) | | First became an executive officer during 2002. Information provided includes compensation received during the entire year 2002. |
(5) | | Reflects increase in salary of $19,200 and salary paid over a 53-week fiscal year. |
17
Option Grants in 2004 Fiscal Year
| | | | Individual Grants
| |
---|
| | | | | | Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term (1)
| |
---|
Name
| | | | Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted
| | Percent of Total Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year
| | Exercise Price per Share
| | Expiration Date
| | 5%
| | 10%
|
---|
Geoffrey F. Cox | | | | | 75,000 | (2) | | | 9.42 | | | $ | 3.96 | | | | 2/13/2014 | | | $ | 186,782 | | | $ | 473,342 | |
| | | | | 1,000 | (3) | | | 0.13 | | | | 2.25 | | | | 12/9/2014 | | | | 1,415 | | | | 3,586 | |
John B. Green | | | | | 25,000 | (2) | | | 3.14 | | | | 3.96 | | | | 2/13/2014 | | | | 62,261 | | | | 157,781 | |
| | | | | 1,000 | (3) | | | 0.13 | | | | 2.25 | | | | 12/9/2014 | | | | 1,415 | | | | 3,586 | |
Gregory F. Liposky | | | | | 35,000 | (2) | | | 4.40 | | | | 3.96 | | | | 2/13/2014 | | | | 87,165 | | | | 220,893 | |
| | | | | 1,000 | (3) | | | 0.13 | | | | 2.25 | | | | 12/9/2014 | | | | 1,415 | | | | 3,586 | |
Harry M. Meade | | | | | 25,000 | (2) | | | 3.14 | | | | 3.96 | | | | 2/13/2014 | | | | 62,261 | | | | 157,781 | |
| | | | | 1,000 | (3) | | | 0.13 | | | | 2.25 | | | | 12/9/2014 | | | | 1,415 | | | | 3,586 | |
Daniel S. Woloshen | | | | | 25,000 | (2) | | | 3.14 | | | | 3.96 | | | | 2/13/2014 | | | | 62,261 | | | | 157,781 | |
| | | | | 1,000 | (3) | | | 0.13 | | | | 2.25 | | | | 12/9/2014 | | | | 1,415 | | | | 3,586 | |
(1) | | The values in this column are given for illustrative purposes only. They do not reflect our estimate or projection of our future stock price. The values are based on an assumption that our common stock’s market price will appreciate at the stated rate, compounded annually, from the date of the option grant until the end of the option’s term. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises will depend upon future performance of our common stock’s price, which will benefit all stockholders proportionately. In order to realize the potential values set forth in the 5% and 10% columns of this table at the end of a typical ten-year option term, the per share price of our common stock would have to be approximately 63% and 159%, respectively, above the total weighted average exercise price of all options described above ($3.92). The potential value to all our stockholders if our price appreciates at rates of 5% and 10% over ten years would be $95,530,288 and $242,092,505, respectively, assuming a purchase of common stock in 2003 at $3.92 per share and 38,799,974 shares outstanding. |
(2) | | These options were granted on February 13, 2004 under our 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, and became exercisable with respect to 20% of the shares on the grant date. The remaining 80% of the underlying shares will vest in four equal installments on the first four anniversaries of the grant date. |
(3) | | These options were granted on December 9, 2004 under our 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, and became exercisable with respect to 20% of the shares on the grant date. The remaining 80% of the underlying shares will vest in four equal installments on the first four anniversaries of the grant date. |
18
Fiscal Year-End Option Table
The following table provides information on the total number of exercisable and unexercisable stock options held at January 2, 2005 by the Named Executive Officers. None of the Named Executive Officers exercised any options during fiscal year 2004.
| | | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year-End
| | Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at Fiscal Year-End(1)
| |
---|
Name
| | | | Exercisable
| | Unexercisable
| | Exercisable
| | Unexercisable
|
---|
Geoffrey F. Cox | | | | | 392,200 | | | | 248,800 | | | $ | 3,500 | | | $ | 5,250 | |
John B. Green | | | | | 205,321 | | | | 77,800 | | | | 0 | | | | 195,472 | |
Gregory F. Liposky | | | | | 112,200 | | | | 80,800 | | | | 1,260 | | | | 84,816 | |
Harry M. Meade | | | | | 162,996 | | | | 71,800 | | | | 1,260 | | | | 1,890 | |
Daniel S. Woloshen | | | | | 98,600 | | | | 65,400 | | | | 1,260 | | | | 1,890 | |
(1) | | Based on the difference between the option’s exercise price and a closing price of $1.52 for the underlying common stock on December 31, 2004 (our last business day of fiscal year 2004) as reported by the NASDAQ National Market. |
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets out the status of securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans at January 2, 2005:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan Category
| | | | (a) Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
| | (b) Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
| | (c) Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column) (a))(3)(4)
|
---|
Equity compensation plans/arrangements approved by the stockholders (1) | | | | | 4,025,798 | (2) | | $ | 5.22 | | | | 3,005,358 | |
Equity compensation plans/arrangements not approved by the stockholders | | | | | 0 | | | | — | | | | 0 | |
Total | | | | | 4,025,798 | | | $ | 5.22 | | | | 3,005,358 | |
(1) | | Includes the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan, the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, and the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. |
19
(2) | | Does not include purchase rights accruing under the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan because the purchase price (and therefore the number of shares to be purchased) will not be determined until the end of the purchase period. |
(3) | | Includes 554,030 shares issuable under the 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 2,451,328 shares issuable under the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated. |
(4) | | Up to 10% of the awards under the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, may be issued as restricted or unrestricted stock awards. For purposes of this limitation, awards subject to performance vesting and awards granted in lieu of cash bonuses are disregarded. |
Executive Employment Agreements
Geoffrey F. Cox. Under the terms of Dr. Cox’s employment agreement entered into in July 2001, Dr. Cox is entitled to a minimum base salary of $31,667 per month ($380,000 on an annualized basis), and is eligible to receive performance and incentive bonuses of not less than 40% of his then current base salary, based on the achievement of certain individual and corporate objectives established jointly by Dr. Cox and the Compensation Committee. In calendar year 2004, which was a 53-week fiscal year, Dr. Cox received a base salary of $428,134.
John B. Green. Under Mr. Green’s employment agreement entered into in August 1997, Mr. Green is entitled to a minimum base salary of $150,000 per year, plus performance and incentive bonuses as determined by the Compensation Committee. In calendar year 2004, which was a 53-week fiscal year, Mr. Green received a base salary of $275,197.
Harry M Meade. Under Dr. Meade’s employment agreement, he is entitled to a minimum base salary of $126,000 per year, plus performance and incentive bonuses as determined by the Compensation Committee. In calendar year 2004, which was a 53-week fiscal year, Dr. Meade received a base salary of $268,053.
Each of these agreements will remain in effect until terminated according to its terms. In the event that we terminate any of these executive officers without cause, the executive officer will immediately be paid the maximum annual bonus for the year he is terminated, prorated for the portion of the year completed, and his then current base salary for a specified severance period, together in one lump sum. Dr. Cox is also entitled to such payments if he terminates his agreement for “good reason” after a “change of control” of GTC and Mr. Green and Dr. Meade are entitled to such payments if either of them terminates his agreement after a “change of control” of GTC, as such terms are defined in their respective employment agreements. In the case of Dr. Cox, the severance period is two years. In the case of Mr. Green, the severance period in the event of a “change of control” is two years and in the event of termination without cause is one year. In the case of Dr. Meade, the severance period is one year. If Dr. Meade terminates his agreement upon a change of control, his severance payments will be reduced by any income that he derives from a subsequent employer during the severance period. In addition, upon a change of control of GTC, any unvested stock options held by these executive officers would become immediately exercisable in full. In the case of Dr. Cox, such options will remain exercisable for a period of two years and in the case of
20
Mr. Green and Dr. Meade, such options will remain exercisable for the duration of the term of such options as if the termination had not occurred.
Messrs. Liposky and Woloshen. Messrs. Liposky and Woloshen entered into Management Agreements in June 2000 and May 1999, respectively. The Management Agreements provide that the executive will receive benefits and severance payments for a one year period at his then current base salary if GTC terminates the executive’s employment without cause. In Mr. Woloshen’s case, without cause includes a change in control.
Compensation Committee Report on Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determines the compensation to be paid to GTC’s executive officers, including its Chief Executive Officer. The Committee also administers GTC’s employee stock purchase and equity incentive plans, including grants of stock options and other awards. The Committee is currently composed of Messrs. Bullock (Chairman), Miller and Tuck. This report is submitted by the Committee and addresses the compensation policies for fiscal year 2004 as they affected Dr. Cox, as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and GTC’s four other executive officers who are named in this year’s Summary Compensation Table.
Compensation Philosophy
GTC’s executive compensation policy is designed to attract, retain and reward executive officers who contribute to GTC’s long-term success by maintaining a competitive salary structure as compared with other biotechnology companies. The compensation program seeks to align compensation with the achievement of business objectives and individual and corporate performance. Bonuses are included to encourage effective individual performance relative to GTC’s current plans and objectives. Stock option grants are key components of the executive compensation program and are intended to provide executives with an equity interest in GTC to link a meaningful portion of the executive’s compensation with the performance of GTC’s common stock.
In executing its compensation policy, the Committee seeks to relate compensation with GTC’s financial performance and business objectives as well as to reward each executive’s achievement of designated targets relating to GTC’s annual and long-term performance and individual fulfillment of responsibilities. While compensation survey data are useful guides for comparative purposes, GTC believes that a successful compensation program also requires the application of judgment and subjective determinations of individual performance. To that extent, the Committee applies its judgment in reconciling the program’s objectives with the realities of retaining valued employees.
Executive Compensation Program
The Company’s executive compensation package for the Chief Executive Officer and the other executive officers is composed of three elements:
21
• | | annual incentive bonuses based on corporate and individual performance; and |
• | | initial, annual and other periodic grants of stock options under the equity plans. |
Executive Officers other than CEO
Base Salary. Our executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer whose compensation is addressed separately below) have employment agreements with GTC which set a minimum annual base salary based upon the executive’s salary history and internal and external equity considerations. At the beginning of fiscal year 2004, the Compensation Committee reviewed the base salaries actually paid to all executive officers during the prior year. With the exception of one executive officer, the annual base salaries for these executive officers remained at their 2003 levels for fiscal year 2004. In the case of Mr. Liposky, the Committee increased his salary in recognition of his increased responsibilities.
Incentive Bonus. For fiscal year 2004, the Committee established a target bonus opportunity for each executive officer. The target bonus opportunity could be exceeded by up to 20% of the target for exceptional corporate and individual performance. Two thirds of the 2004 bonus potential was tied to company-wide goals and one third was tied to the Committee’s judgment of each individual’s performance measured against goals determined by the Chief Executive Officer. In February 2005, the Compensation Committee reviewed with the Chief Executive Officer the performance of each executive officer and determined the bonus to be paid to each of them based on company performance measured against the company-wide goals and the achievement of the individual’s performance goals for 2004. The portion of bonuses based on company-wide goals included assessment of performance measured against a number of goals in the areas of GTC’s clinical development, transgenic production capabilities, external programs, business development and financial performance, and other performance goals agreed upon between the Committee and the Chief Executive Officer. In 2004, the incentive bonuses awarded to executive officers ranged from 52% to 58% of their target bonuses, which resulted in bonus payments to the executive officers ranging from approximately 16% to 22% of their base salaries. The Committee determined that approximately 25% of executive bonuses would be paid in GTC common stock, with the remainder paid in cash.
Stock Options. Executive officer compensation also includes long-term incentives through GTC’s stock option program, the purpose of which is to:
• | | highlight and reinforce the mutual, long-term interests between employees and the stockholders; and |
• | | to assist in the attraction and retention of important key executives, managers and individual contributors who are essential to GTC’s growth and development. |
In February 2004, the Committee approved annual stock option grants to each of GTC’s executive officers. The size of stock option awards is generally intended to reflect the significance of the executive’s current and anticipated contributions to GTC’s overall performance. For each stock
22
option grant, 20% vested immediately and the balance vests 20% annually over four years. The exercise price per share of the stock options is equal to the fair market value of a share of GTC common stock on the date of grant. Awards to the Named Executive Officers are detailed in the “Summary Compensation Table” in this proxy statement.In December 2004, the Committee approved option awards to each GTC employee to purchase 1,000 shares of GTC common stock in recognition of the company-wide effort to respond to the regulatory requirements of our European Medicines Agency submission for ATryn®. As employees, each of GTC’s executive officers received such an award. The options have an exercise price of $2.25 per share, which is 150% of the price of GTC common stock when the options were granted.
Chief Executive Officer
The Compensation Committee determines the compensation of Dr. Cox as GTC’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, based upon the same factors as those employed by the Committee for executive officers generally. In addition, the Committee weighs Dr. Cox’s leadership, industry prominence and GTC’s overall performance as important criteria upon which his compensation is based. His performance goals for 2004 had comparable components to those for the other executive officers. Two thirds of his 2004 bonus potential was tied to company-wide goals and one third was tied to the Committee’s judgment of his individual performance measured against previously agreed upon goals determined by the Committee and Dr. Cox.
At the request of Dr. Cox, there was no increase to his salary in either 2003 or 2004 and, therefore, Dr. Cox’s salary remained at its 2002 level. During fiscal year 2004, Dr. Cox received a base salary of $428,134, which reflects a 53-week fiscal year. As a result of GTC’s performance measured against company-wide goals and Dr. Cox’s achievements compared to his individual goals during 2004, the Committee in February 2005 awarded him a bonus of $94,100, which is equal to approximately 22% of his base salary in 2004. The Committee determined that approximately 25% of his bonus would be paid in GTC common stock, with the remainder paid in cash. In February 2004, the Committee granted Dr. Cox an option to purchase 75,000 shares of GTC common stock, of which 20% vested immediately and the balance vests 20% annually over four years. The exercise price per share of the stock options is equal to the fair market value of a share of GTC’s common stock on the date of grant. In addition, in December 2004, the Committee awarded Dr. Cox an option to purchase 1,000 shares of Common Stock as part of the one-time company-wide grant of options described above.
Compensation Deductibility
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code denies a tax deduction to a public corporation for annual compensation in excess of one million dollars paid to its Chief Executive Officer and its four other highest compensated officers. This provision excludes certain types of “performance based compensation” from the compensation subject to the limit. The Committee does not expect to pay any one covered employee salary and bonus for 2005 that could exceed one million dollars. In addition, GTC’s 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended and Restated, contains an individual annual
23
limit on the number of stock options and stock appreciation rights that may be granted under the plan so that such awards will qualify for the exclusion from the limitation on deductibility for performance-based compensation. In light of pending changes by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to the accounting standards governing the treatment of equity-based compensation, GTC is also expected to seek stockholder approval next year of general business criteria upon which other types of cash and equity incentive awards may be made in the future on a fully-deductible basis. The Committee believes, however, that in some circumstances factors other than tax deductibility are more important in determining the forms and levels of executive compensation most appropriate and in the best interests of GTC and its stockholders. Given our industry and business, as well as the competitive market for outstanding executives, we believe that it is important for the Committee to retain the flexibility to design compensation programs consistent with its executive compensation philosophy for GTC, even if some executive compensation is not fully deductible. Accordingly, the Committee may from time to time approve elements of compensation for certain executives that are not fully deductible.
By the Compensation Committee,
Francis J. Bullock, Chair
Marvin L. Miller
Alan W. Tuck
24
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total stockholder return of the S&P 500 Composite Index and the NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index during the period from January 2, 2000 to January 2, 2005. The NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index is comprised of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with the SIC Code 283 (Division/Manufacturing, Major Group/Chemical and Allied Products, Industry Group/Drugs) whose securities are traded on the NASDAQ National Market. We believe the NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index is representative of our peer biotechnology companies.
This graph assumes an initial investment of $100 on January 2, 2000 in our common stock, the S&P 500 Composite Index and the NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index, with all dividends, if any, being reinvested. The total stockholder return is measured by dividing the share price change of the respective securities plus dividends, if any, for each fiscal year shown by the share price at the end of the particular fiscal year.
Comparison of the Cumulative Total Return
Among GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc.
the S&P 500 Index and the NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index
| | | | 1/2/00
| | 12/31/00
| | 12/30/01
| | 12/29/02
| | 12/28/03
| | 01/02/05
|
---|
GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc. | | | | | 100.00 | | | | 113.37 | | | | 46.81 | | | | 8.87 | | | | 23.76 | | | | 12.04 | |
NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index | | | | | 100.00 | | | | 123.92 | | | | 105.27 | | | | 64.88 | | | | 93.59 | | | | 101.16 | |
S&P 500 Composite Index | | | | | 100.00 | | | | 90.89 | | | | 80.09 | | | | 62.39 | | | | 80.29 | | | | 89.02 | |
25
AUDITORS
Report of the Audit Committee
The following is the report of the Audit Committee with respect to GTC’s audited financial statements for the year ended January 2, 2005.
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee GTC’s accounting and financial reporting, internal control and audit functions. The Audit Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors as defined by applicable NASDAQ Stock Market standards.
Management is responsible for our internal controls and the financial reporting process. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing independent audits of our consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with the standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and issuing a report thereon. The Committee’s responsibility is to monitor these processes. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm.
In the course of its oversight of GTC’s financial reporting process, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has:
• | | reviewed and discussed with management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, GTC’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2005; |
• | | discussed with the independent registered public accountant the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61,Communication with Audit Committees; |
• | | received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accountant required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1,Independence Discussions with Audit Committees; |
• | | reviewed with management and the independent registered public accountant GTC’s critical accounting policies; |
• | | discussed with management the quality and adequacy of GTC’s internal controls over financial reporting; |
• | | discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP any relationships that may impact their objectivity and independence; and |
• | | considered whether the provision of non-audit services by the independent registered public accountant is compatible with maintaining the registered public accountant’s independence. |
26
Based on the foregoing review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in GTC’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2005 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
By the Audit Committee,
Alan W. Tuck, Chair
Robert W. Baldridge
Pamela W. McNamara
Independent Registered Public Accountants’ Fees and Other Matters
The firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited our consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 2, 2005 and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting at January 2, 2005. The Audit Committee appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as our independent registered public accountant for the 2004 year-end audit and to review our quarterly financial reports for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission during fiscal year 2005. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are expected to attend the annual meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. They will also have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire.
The following table shows the fees paid or accrued by us for professional services performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for fiscal years 2004 and 2003:
| | | | 2004
| | 2003
|
---|
Audit Fees(1) | | | | $ | 440,200 | | | $ | 231,000 | |
Audit-Related Fees(2) | | | | | — | | | | 27,000 | |
Tax Fees(3) | | | | | 35,142 | | | | 48,286 | |
All Other Fees(4) | | | | | 1,500 | | | | — | |
Total | | | | $ | 476,842 | | | $ | 306,286 | |
(1) | | Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audits of our annual consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting and review of our quarterly financial statements and audit services provided in connection with other statutory or regulatory filings. |
(2) | | Audit-related fees are for assurance and related services and consisted primarily of audits of employee benefit plans and consultations regarding accounting, regulatory and financial reporting matters. All audit-related services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee. |
(3) | | For fiscal 2004 and 2003, tax fees principally included tax compliance fees of $35,142 and $25,000, respectively, and tax advice and tax planning fees of $0 and $23,286, respectively. |
(4) | | All other fees include technical research materials. |
27
Pre-Approval Policy
In accordance with the Audit Committee’s Charter, the Audit Committee pre-approves the proposed services, including the scope of services contemplated and the related fees, associated with the current year audit. The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures for the pre-approval of non-audit services for the purpose of maintaining the independence of our independent registered public accountant. Management must obtain the specific prior approval of the Audit Committee for each engagement of the independent registered public accountant to perform any non-audit services that exceed the pre-approved amounts. In 2004, the Audit Committee pre-approved specific non-audit services subject to cost limits to be performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in order to assure that these services do not impair the independent registered public accountant’s independence. All of the non-audit services rendered by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in the 2004 fiscal year were pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with these limits.
28
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Deadline for Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations
Assuming the 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is not held before April 25, 2006 or after June 24, 2006, if you wish to bring business before or propose director nominations at the 2006 Annual Meeting, you must give written notice to GTC by March 11, 2006 (the date 75 days before the anniversary of the 2005 Annual Meeting).
If you intend to bring such a proposal or nomination at the 2006 Annual Meeting, and you would like us to consider the inclusion of your proposal or nomination in our proxy statement for the meeting, you must provide written notice to GTC of such proposal or nomination prior to December 23, 2005.
Any stockholder wishing to recommend a director candidate for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should provide the following information to Vice President, Corporate Communications, c/o GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc., 175 Crossing Boulevard, Framingham, Massachusetts 01702: (a) a brief statement outlining the reasons the nominee would be an effective director for GTC; (b)(i) the name, age and business and residence addresses of the candidate, (ii) the principal occupation or employment of the candidate for the past five years, as well as information about any other board of directors and board committee on which the candidate has served during that period, (iii) the number of shares of our common stock, if any, beneficially owned by the candidate and (iv) details of any business or other significant relationship the candidate has ever had with GTC; and (c)(i) the stockholder’s name and record address and the name and address of the beneficial owner of shares of our common stock, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made and (ii) the number of shares of our common stock that the stockholder and any such other beneficial owner beneficially own. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may seek further information from or about the stockholder making the recommendation, the candidate, or any such other beneficial owner, including information about all business and other relationships between the candidate and the stockholder and between the candidate and any such other beneficial owner.
Householding of Annual Meeting Materials
Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of our proxy statement or annual report may have been sent to multiple stockholders in your household. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of either document to you if you write or call us at the following address or phone number: GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc., 175 Crossing Boulevard, Framingham, Massachusetts 01702, Attention: Vice President, Corporate Communications (508-620-9700 x5374). If you wish to receive separate copies of the annual report and proxy statement in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you should contact your bank, broker, or other nominee record holder, or you may contact us at the above address and phone number.
29
FORM OF PROXY CARD
GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS ON MAY 25, 2005
The undersigned stockholder of GTC Biotherapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby appoints Geoffrey F. Cox, John B. Green and Nathaniel S. Gardiner, or any of them acting singly, the attorneys and proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to vote on behalf of the undersigned all of the shares of capital stock of the Company that the undersigned is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held at 2:00 p.m. local time on Wednesday, May 25, 2005 at the Forefront Center for Meetings and Conferences, 404 Wyman Street, Waltham, Massachusetts, and at all adjournments thereof, hereby revoking any proxy heretofore given with respect to such shares.
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER(S). IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1. AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETERMINATION OF A MAJORITY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AS TO ANY OTHER MATTERS.
THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER MAY REVOKE THIS PROXY AT ANY TIME BEFORE IT IS VOTED BY DELIVERING EITHER A WRITTEN NOTICE OF REVOCATION OF THE PROXY OR A DULY EXECUTED PROXY BEARING A LATER DATE TO THE SECRETARY, OR BY ATTENDING THE 2005 ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING IN PERSON. THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF THE NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENT FOR THE 2005 ANNUAL MEETING.
PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD AS SOON AS
POSSIBLE USING THE ENCLOSED REPLY ENVELOPE
(CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED AND DATED ON REVERSE SIDE.)
(REVERSE SIDE OF PROXY CARD)
2005 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
GTC BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
MAY 25, 2005
VOTE BY INTERNET – www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and then follow the instructions to submit an electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE SHAREHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by GTC Biotherapeutics in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access shareholder communications electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign, and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided.
PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND RETURN YOUR
PROXY CARD IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
| | | | |
Please mark your vote in blue or black ink as shown here x |
| | FOR all nominees | FOR ALL EXCEPT (see instructions below) | WITHHELD AUTHORITY for all nominees |
| | | | |
1. | Proposal to elect three directors | ¨ | ¨ | ¨ |
| | | | |
| Nominees: | Francis J. Bullock | ¡ | |
| | Geoffrey F. Cox | ¡ | |
| | Alan W. Tuck | ¡ | |
| | | | |
INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “FOR ALL EXCEPT” and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here: = | |
| | |
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method | | ¨ |
| | |
Please indicate if you plan to attend the meeting | ¨ | ¨ |
| Yes | No |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Signature of Stockholder or Authorized Representative | | Date | | Signature of Stockholder or Authorized Representative (joint owners) | | Date |
Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this proxy. When shares are held jointly, each joint holder should personally sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.