Nevada PGA Filings. As a result of increases in gas costs experienced since the last annual PGA filing in June 2003 (in addition to projected continued increases), an out-of-cycle PGA filing was made in December 2003. In May 2004, the PUCN approved a $43.3 million annualized increase in southern Nevada and a $12.1 million increase in northern Nevada. The new rates were effective June 2004. In June 2004, Southwest made its annual PGA filings with the PUCN. If the PGA filings are approved by the PUCN, rates would increase $16.3 million for customers in southern Nevada and $2.6 million for customers in northern Nevada. Southwest has requested that the rates be made effective December 2004. A PUCN decision is expected in the fourth quarter of 2004. In a separate action, the PUCN issued an order in October 2004 instructing Southwest to eliminate the PGA provisions in its tariff and instead account for gas costs as provided under the deferred energy provisions of the Nevada Administrative Code. These provisions result in little difference in the method used to account for or report purchased gas costs, including the ability of the Company to defer over or under collections of gas costs to balancing accounts. However, Southwest intends to file comments with the PUCN during November to clarify the requirements. The changes become effective at the time Southwest makes its next gas cost adjustment filing. Other Filings LNG Facilities. The Company leases a liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) facility and approximately 61 miles of transmission main on its northern Nevada system under a lease that expires in July 2005. These storage and transmission facilities provide peaking capabilities during high demand months. Negotiations to purchase the facilities were begun several years ago and preparations were also being made to provide alternatives to the leased facilities to be in service by July 2005 in the event that a purchase agreement could not be consummated. In May 2004, Paiute Pipeline Company (“Paiute”), an interstate pipeline subsidiary of Southwest Gas, filed an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) to abandon the leased facilities and to construct a compressor station to replace a portion of the transmission system capacity. Tuscarora Gas Transmission Company (“Tuscarora”) also made a filing with the FERC proposing to expand its system to provide additional service to the customers whose LNG service was to be terminated. In June 2004, the Company received a notice of default and demand for indemnification asserting that it was in default on the lease from Uzal, LLC (“Uzal”), the owner of the facilities. The Company responded to the notice of default certifying that no event of default exists and disputing the scope of the claims. In June 2004, Uzal filed suit in the United States District Court, District of Nevada, alleging breach of the lease and certain related agreements, tortious interference with contract, and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage. In July 2004, Uzal filed an application with the FERC seeking authorization to provide storage and transportation service from the LNG facilities. In October 2004, the Company and Uzal reached an agreement to resolve their dispute. Subject to securing regulatory approval, the litigation will be dismissed and Paiute will purchase the LNG facilities and associated transmission main for approximately $22 million, and continue to provide natural gas storage service in northern California and northern Nevada. 16
In addition to the Paiute-Uzal Settlement, Paiute and Southwest are parties to a Joint Parties Settlement filed with the FERC. Other members of the Joint Parties Settlement include Avista Corporation, Public Service Resources Corporation, Sierra Pacific Power Company, Tuscarora, and Uzal. The Joint Parties Settlement is predicated upon Paiute’s acquisition of the LNG facilities pursuant to the Paiute-Uzal Settlement. The Joint Parties Settlement, once it receives regulatory approval and the required closing on the purchase of the LNG facilities occurs, will completely resolve five pending, contested FERC proceedings, as well as two related court cases. FERC approval of the Joint Parties Settlement would result in the issuance of a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity to Paiute authorizing it to acquire and operate the LNG facilities, as well as providing Paiute with the authority to provide long-term LNG storage services to its customers under new storage service agreements. FERC approval would determine that the purchase price of the LNG facilities and the allocation of the purchase price between the storage and transmission functions is reasonable for both rate and accounting purposes. Finally, Paiute would withdraw its application related to the abandonment of the leased facilities and construction of a compressor station. In addition, Tuscarora would withdraw its application to construct its proposed 2005 expansion project, and Uzal would withdraw its application seeking authorization to provide storage and transportation service from the LNG facilities. A FERC decision on the Joint Parties Settlement is expected in the fourth quarter of 2004. El Paso Transportation System. Over the past several years, the FERC has examined capacity allocation issues on the El Paso system in several proceedings. This examination resulted in a series of orders by the FERC in which all of the major full requirements transportation service agreements on the El Paso system, including the agreement by which Southwest obtained the transportation of gas supplies to its Arizona service areas, were converted to contract demand-type service agreements, with fixed maximum service limits, effective September 2003. At that time, all of the transportation capacity on the system was allocated among the shippers. In order to help ensure that the converting full requirements shippers would have adequate capacity to meet their needs, El Paso was authorized to expand the capacity on its system by adding compression. The FERC is continuing to examine issues related to the implementation of the full requirements conversion. Parties, including Southwest, have filed petitions for judicial review of the FERC’s orders mandating the conversion. Management believes that it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of the appellate proceedings or the impact of the FERC action on Southwest. Management believes adequate capacity exists for the upcoming 2004/2005 heating season. Additional costs may be incurred to acquire capacity in the future as a result of the FERC order. However, it is anticipated that any additional costs will be collected from customers through the PGA mechanism. Capital Resources and Liquidity The capital requirements and resources of the Company generally are determined independently for the natural gas operations and construction services segments. Each business activity is generally responsible for securing its own financing sources. The capital requirements and resources of the construction services segment are not material to the overall capital requirements and resources of the Company. Southwest continues to experience significant customer growth. This growth has required significant capital outlays for new transmission and distribution plant, to keep up with consumer demand. During the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2004, capital expenditures for the natural gas operations segment were $248 million. Approximately 71 percent of these current-period expenditures represented new construction and the balance represented costs associated with routine replacement of existing transmission, distribution, and general plant. Cash flows from operating activities of Southwest (net of dividends) provided $107 million of the required capital resources pertaining to these construction expenditures. The remainder was provided from external financing activities. Operating cash flows in the most recent twelve months were negatively impacted by natural gas prices as PGA balances have changed from an over-collection of $22.4 million at September 30, 2003 to an under-collection of $54.4 million at September 30, 2004. Southwest utilizes short-term borrowings to temporarily finance under-collected PGA balances. 17
Asset Purchases In July 2004, the Company announced an agreement with Avista to purchase Avista’s natural gas distribution properties in South Lake Tahoe, California. Avista serves approximately 18,000 customers in this region. The cash purchase price for the properties is $15 million, subject to closing adjustments. The agreement is also subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory review, including approval by the CPUC. Once approvals have been received, the properties will be integrated into the northern Nevada operations of Southwest, which include contiguous gas properties in the Lake Tahoe Basin. It is anticipated that Southwest will assume the rates in effect at the time of closing the purchase. The purchase price will be financed using existing credit facilities. 2004 Construction Expenditures and Financing In March 2002, the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002 (“2002 Act”) was signed into law. The 2002 Act provided a three-year, 30 percent bonus depreciation deduction for businesses. The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (“2003 Act”), signed into law in May 2003, provides for enhanced and extended bonus tax depreciation. The 2003 Act increased the bonus depreciation rate to 50 percent for qualifying property placed in service after May 2003 and, generally, before January 2005. Southwest estimates the 2002 and 2003 Acts’ bonus depreciation deductions will defer the payment of $35 million of federal income taxes during 2004. Southwest estimates construction expenditures during the three-year period ending December 31, 2006 will be approximately $690 million. Of this amount, $233 million are expected to be incurred in 2004. During the three-year period, cash flow from operating activities including the impacts of the Acts (net of dividends) is estimated to fund approximately 80 percent of the gas operations total construction expenditures. The Company expects to raise $50 million to $55 million from its DRSPP. The remaining cash requirements are expected to be provided by other external financing sources. The timing, types, and amounts of these additional external financings will be dependent on a number of factors, including conditions in the capital markets, timing and amounts of rate relief, growth levels in Southwest service areas, and earnings. These external financings may include the issuance of both debt and equity securities, bank and other short-term borrowings, and other forms of financing. In April 2004, the Company entered into a sales agency financing agreement with BNY Capital Markets, Inc. (“BNYCMI”). Of the $200 million in securities available under the Company’s shelf registration statement, the Company filed a prospectus supplement in May designating an aggregate $60 million as common stock to be issued in at-the-market offerings (“Equity Shelf Program”) from time to time with BNYCMI acting as agent. During 2004, the Company issued approximately 1.7 million additional shares through its DRSPP, Employee Investment Plan, Management Incentive Plan, Stock Incentive Plan, and Equity Shelf Program. Of this activity, approximately 860,000 shares were issued in at-the-market offerings through the Equity Shelf Program with gross proceeds of $20.1 million, agent commissions of $201,000, and net proceeds of $19.9 million. For the quarter ended September 30, 2004, approximately 548,000 shares were issued with gross proceeds of $12.9 million, agent commissions of $129,000, and net proceeds of $12.7 million. In July 2004, the Company issued $65 million in Clark County, Nevada IDRBs Series 2004A, due 2034. The net proceeds from the 5.25% tax-exempt bonds were used to finance construction and improvement of pipeline systems and facilities located in southern Nevada. In August 2004, the Company registered 1 million additional shares of common stock with the SEC for issuance under the DRSPP. In September 2004, the Company remarketed the $20 million 3.35% 2003 Series D IDRBs, due 2038, at a rate of 5.25%. The original 3.35% interest rate was an 18-month rate which was required to be remarketed by September 2004. 18
In October 2004, the Company issued $75 million in Clark County, Nevada 5% Series 2004B IDRRBs due 2033. The Series 2004B IDRRBs were issued at a discount of 0.625%. The proceeds of the new IDRRBs will be used to refinance $75 million in 6.5% 1993 Series A IDRBs due 2033. The redemption of the 1993 Series A IDRBs will occur on December 1, 2004 and includes an early redemption premium of 1% ($750,000). Liquidity Liquidity refers to the ability of an enterprise to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its cash requirements. Several general factors that could significantly affect capital resources and liquidity in future years include inflation, growth in the economy, changes in income tax laws, changes in the ratemaking policies of regulatory commissions, interest rates, the variability of natural gas prices, and the level of Company earnings. The rate schedules in all of the service territories of Southwest contain PGA clauses which permit adjustments to rates as the cost of purchased gas changes. The PGA mechanism allows Southwest to change the gas cost component of the rates charged to its customers to reflect increases or decreases in the price expected to be paid to its suppliers and companies providing interstate pipeline transportation service. On an interim basis, Southwest generally defers over or under-collections of gas costs to PGA balancing accounts. In addition, Southwest uses this mechanism to either refund amounts over-collected or recoup amounts under-collected as compared to the price paid for natural gas during the period since the last PGA rate change went into effect. At September 30, 2004, the combined balances in PGA accounts totaled an under-collection of $54.4 million. At December 31, 2003, the combined balances in PGA accounts totaled an under-collection of $9.2 million. Southwest utilizes short-term borrowings to temporarily finance under-collected PGA balances. SeePGA Filingsfor more information on recent regulatory filings. Effective May 2004, the Company obtained a new $250 million three-year credit facility of which $150 million is for working capital purposes (and related outstanding amounts will be designated as short-term debt). Interest rates for the new facility are calculated at either the London Interbank Offering Rate (“LIBOR”) plus an applicable margin, or the greater of the prime rate or one-half of one percent plus the Federal Funds rate. The new facility replaces the former $250 million credit facility consisting of a $125 million three-year facility and a $125 million 364-day facility. The Company believes the $150 million designated for working capital purposes is adequate to meet anticipated liquidity needs ($112 million was available at September 30, 2004). The following table sets forth the ratios of earnings to fixed charges for the Company (because of the seasonal nature of the Company’s business, these ratios are computed on a twelve-month basis): |