The Company maintains liability insurance for various risks associated with the operation of its natural gas pipelines and facilities. In connection with these liability insurance policies, the Company has been responsible for an initial deductible or self-insured retention amount per incident, after which the insurance carriers would be responsible for amounts up to the policy limits. For the policy year August 2004 to July 2005, the self-insured retention amount associated with general liability claims increased from $1 million per incident to $1 million per incident plus payment of the first $10 million in aggregate claims above $1 million in the policy year. In May 2005, a leaking natural gas line was involved in a fire that injured an individual. The injuries are severe and life threatening. The cause of the leak is under investigation. Claims are expected to be filed against the Company. If the Company was deemed fully or partially responsible, the Company estimates its exposure could be from $1 million to $11 million (the maximum noted above) depending on a number of factors currently under investigation. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a $1 million liability related to this incident. Future results of operations would be impacted to the extent that the Company was deemed responsible for amounts in excess of $1 million. However, the Company believes that the range of possible losses would not materially affect the financial position of the Company.
For the policy year August 2005 to July 2006, the Company entered into insurance contracts that limit the Company’s self-insured retention to $1 million per incident plus payment of the first $5 million in aggregate claims above $1 million.
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs.” SFAS No. 151 is an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (“ARB”) No. 43, “Restatement and Revision of Accounting Research Bulletins.” SFAS No. 151 addresses the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight handling costs and spoilage and will no longer allow companies to capitalize such inventory costs on their balance sheets when the production defect rate varies significantly from the expected rate. The provisions of SFAS No. 151 are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets.” SFAS No. 153 is an amendment of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions.” SFAS No. 153 addresses the accounting for exchanges of similar productive assets and eliminates the exception to the fair-value principle for such exchanges, which previously had been accounted for based on the book value of the asset surrendered with no gain recognition. Under SFAS No. 153, using certain criteria, the gain would be recognized currently and not deferred. The provisions of SFAS No. 153 are effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company adopted the standard on July 1, 2005. The adoption did not have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” SFAS No. 154 is a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, “Accounting Changes” and SFAS No. 3, “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements.” SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle, and requires retrospective application for voluntary changes in accounting principle unless it is impracticable to do so. The provisions of SFAS No. 154 are effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION | Form 10-Q |
September 30, 2005
estimated. FIN 47 is designed to clarify when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation.
Upon adoption of SFAS No. 143 in January 2003, Southwest concluded it could not reasonably estimate its conditional asset retirement obligation. At the time of adoption, Southwest determined that it had limited legal obligations related to retirement costs for portions of its system that are subject to limited-duration easements and rights-of-way agreements. However, Southwest has traditionally been able to renew its easements and rights-of-way without having to retire, abandon, or remove facilities, and anticipates no serious difficulties in obtaining future renewals. In addition, certain franchises and provisions of federal and state statutes for abandonment of facilities impose removal obligations under certain conditions. Southwest has the intent and the ability to operate such facilities indefinitely. As a result, the probability and length of time until settlement of the asset retirement obligation is unknown. The Company will adopt the provisions of FIN 47 on December 31, 2005. Management is evaluating the criteria under FIN 47 to determine what, if any, impact the new standard may have on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” and supersedes APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This statement eliminates the alternative to use APB No. 25 and the intrinsic value method of accounting. SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) requires entities to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of those awards (with limited exceptions). The provisions of the statement (as amended by the SEC) are effective for the Company beginning January 2006. In 2006, compensation expense will increase due to the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) since no compensation expense is currently recorded for the Company's Stock Incentive Plan. For more information regarding the effect the original SFAS No. 123 would have had on historical results of operations, see Note 1-Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Stock-Based Compensation.
Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report contains statements which constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“Reform Act”). All statements other than statements of historical fact included or incorporated by reference in this quarterly report are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s plans, objectives, goals, projections, strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions. The words “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “continue,” and similar words and expressions are generally used and intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor protection provided by the Reform Act.
A number of important factors affecting the business and financial results of the Company could cause actual results to differ materially from those stated in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, the impact of weather variations on customer usage, customer growth rates, changes in natural gas prices, our ability to recover costs through our PGA mechanism, the effects of regulation/deregulation, the timing and amount of rate relief, changes in rate design, changes in gas procurement practices, changes in capital requirements and funding, the impact of conditions in the capital markets on financing costs, changes in construction expenditures and financing, renewal of franchises, easements and rights-of-way, changes in operations and maintenance expenses, effects of accounting changes, future liability claims, changes in pipeline capacity for the transportation of gas and related costs, acquisitions and management’s plans related thereto, competition and our ability to raise capital in external financings or through our DRSPP. In addition, the Company can provide no assurance that its discussions regarding certain trends relating to its financing, operations and maintenance expenses will continue in future periods. For additional information on the risks associated with the Company’s business, see Item 1. Business-Company Risk Factors in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION | Form 10-Q |
September 30, 2005
All forward-looking statements in this quarterly report are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to the Company as of the date hereof, and the Company assumes no obligation to update or revise any of its forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes show that the indicated results or events will not be realized. We caution you not to unduly rely on any forward-looking statement(s).
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
See Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in the Company’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. No material changes have occurred related to the Company’s disclosures about market risk.
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or management override of the control. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Based on the most recent evaluation, as of September 30, 2005, management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, believe the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at attaining the level of reasonable assurance noted above.
NPL, the Company's construction subsidiary, converted several automated functions (accounts payable, accounts receivable, fixed assets and general ledger) to a new application during the first quarter of 2005, resulting in a material change in internal controls. Pre-implementation testing and post-implementation reviews were conducted by management to ensure that internal controls surrounding the system implementation process, the applications, and manual closing process were properly designed to prevent material financial statement errors. The evaluation of the operating effectiveness of related key controls was completed in the third quarter of 2005. There have been no other changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the third quarter of 2005 that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION | Form 10-Q |
September 30, 2005
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
The Company is named as a defendant in various legal proceedings. The ultimate dispositions of these proceedings are not presently determinable; however, it is the opinion of management that none of this litigation individually or in the aggregate will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. See Note 7 –Contingency for potential future liability issues.
The following documents are filed as part of this report on Form 10-Q:
| Exhibit 4.1 | - | Indenture for $100 million Clark County IDRBs. |
| Exhibit 10.1 | - | Financing Agreement between the Company and Clark County, Nevada, dated as of October 1, 2005. |
| Exhibit 10.2 | - | Significant Terms of Employment and Change in Control Agreements by Individual Officer and Director Group. |
| Exhibit 12.1 | - | Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
| Exhibit 31.1 | - | Section 302 Certifications. |
| Exhibit 32.1 | - | Section 906 Certifications. |
SOUTHWEST GAS CORPORATION | Form 10-Q |
September 30, 2005
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| | Southwest Gas Corporation |
| | (Registrant) |
| | |
Date: November 8, 2005 | | |
| | |
| | /s/ Roy R. Centrella |
| | Roy R. Centrella |
| | Vice President/Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |