UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-09005
Name of Registrant: Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Funds
Address of Registrant:
P.O. Box 2600
Valley Forge, PA 19482
Name and address of agent for service:
Heidi Stam, Esquire
P.O. Box 876
Valley Forge, PA 19482
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (610) 669-1000
Date of fiscal year end: November 30
Date of reporting period: December 1, 2014 – May 31, 2015
Item 1: Reports to Shareholders
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000932471-15-006639/massachusettstax-exemptfx1x1.jpg)
Semiannual Report | May 31, 2015
Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund
The mission continues
On May 1, 1975, Vanguard began operations, a fledgling company based on the simple but revolutionary idea that a mutual fund company should be managed solely in the interest of its investors.
Four decades later, that revolutionary spirit continues to animate the enterprise. Vanguard remains on a mission to give investors the best chance of investment success.
As we mark our 40th anniversary, we thank you for entrusting your assets to Vanguard and giving us the opportunity to help you reach your financial goals in the decades to come.
| |
Contents | |
Your Fund’s Total Returns. | 1 |
Chairman’s Letter. | 2 |
Advisor’s Report. | 7 |
Fund Profile. | 11 |
Performance Summary. | 12 |
Financial Statements. | 13 |
About Your Fund’s Expenses. | 32 |
Trustees Approve Advisory Arrangement. | 34 |
Glossary. | 35 |
Please note: The opinions expressed in this report are just that—informed opinions. They should not be considered promises or advice. Also, please keep in mind that the information and opinions cover the period through the date on the front of this report. Of course, the risks of investing in your fund are spelled out in the prospectus.
See the Glossary for definitions of investment terms used in this report.
About the cover: Since our founding, Vanguard has drawn inspiration from the enterprise and valor demonstrated by British naval hero Horatio Nelson and his command at the Battle of the Nile in 1798. The photograph displays a replica of a merchant ship from the same era as Nelson’s flagship, the HMS Vanguard.
| | | | |
Your Fund’s Total Returns | | | | |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended May 31, 2015 | | | | |
| | Taxable- | | |
| SEC | Equivalent | Income | Capital | Total |
| Yield | Yield | Returns | Returns | Returns |
Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | 2.22% | 4.14% | 1.53% | -0.59% | 0.94% |
Barclays MA Municipal Bond Index | | | | 0.69 |
Massachusetts Municipal Debt Funds Average | | | | 0.86 |
Massachusetts Municipal Debt Funds Average: Derived from data provided by Lipper, a Thomson Reuters Company. | |
The calculation of taxable-equivalent yield assumes a typical itemized tax return and is based on the maximum federal tax rate of 43.4% and the maximum income tax rate for the state. Local taxes were not considered. Please see the prospectus for a detailed explanation of the calculation.
| | | | |
Your Fund’s Performance at a Glance | | | | |
November 30, 2014, Through May 31, 2015 | | | | |
| | | Distributions Per Share |
| Starting | Ending | Income | Capital |
| Share Price | Share Price | Dividends | Gains |
Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | $10.87 | $10.74 | $0.166 | $0.067 |
1
Chairman’s Letter
Dear Shareholder,
The broad U.S. municipal bond market earned positive but muted returns in the half year ended May 31, 2015, after a strong showing in the previous 12 months. As I cautioned in my letter to you in our annual report, the robust returns––especially for longer-maturity funds––were unlikely to continue given how low interest rates had fallen.
Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund returned 0.94% for the six months, exceeding the 0.69% return of its benchmark, the Barclays Massachusetts Municipal Bond Index, and the 0.86% average return of competing Massachusetts tax-exempt funds. The fund’s result also surpassed the 0.71% return for the broad muni bond market, as measured by the Barclays Municipal Bond Index.
If not for interest income, the fund would have recorded a negative result. The fund’s return from interest income was 1.53%, while its capital return was –0.59%.
The fund’s 30-day SEC yield rose a bit, to 2.22% as of May 31 from 2.16% six months earlier.
Please note: The fund is permitted to invest in securities whose income is subject to the alternative minimum tax (AMT). However, as of the end of the period, it owned none of these bonds.
2
Taxable bonds gained ground, despite setbacks along the way
The broad U.S. taxable bond market returned 1.09% for the six months, although results turned slightly negative in the latter half of the period. The yield of the 10-year Treasury note ended May at 2.14%, down from 2.25% six months earlier.
International bond markets (as measured by the Barclays Global Aggregate Index ex USD) returned –6.65%, restrained by the U.S. dollar’s strength against many foreign currencies. Without this currency effect, international bond returns were positive as the stimulative monetary policies of central banks across the globe helped bond returns.
Short-term interest rates, pegged to the Federal Reserve’s target of 0%–0.25%, severely limited returns for money market funds and savings accounts.
U.S. stocks stayed positive although clouds hovered
The broad U.S. stock market returned nearly 4% for the period. Corporate profits generally exceeded expectations, the Fed remained cautious in its approach to expected short-term interest rate hikes, and other nations’ central banks continued their monetary stimulus programs. These factors helped offset pressures on the market that included perceived high stock valuations and renewed debt troubles for Greece.
| | | |
Market Barometer | | | |
| | | Total Returns |
| | Periods Ended May 31, 2015 |
| Six | One | Five Years |
| Months | Year | (Annualized) |
Bonds | | | |
Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (Broad taxable | | | |
market) | 1.09% | 3.03% | 3.90% |
Barclays Municipal Bond Index (Broad tax-exempt market) | 0.71 | 3.18 | 4.53 |
Citigroup Three-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
|
Stocks | | | |
Russell 1000 Index (Large-caps) | 3.41% | 11.91% | 16.68% |
Russell 2000 Index (Small-caps) | 6.94 | 11.32 | 15.04 |
Russell 3000 Index (Broad U.S. market) | 3.67 | 11.86 | 16.54 |
FTSE All-World ex US Index (International) | 3.78 | 0.08 | 8.51 |
|
CPI | | | |
Consumer Price Index | 0.70% | -0.04% | 1.74% |
3
International stocks returned almost 4% for U.S. investors, although results would have been more robust if not for the dollar’s strength against many foreign currencies. Returns for the developed markets of the Pacific region, led by Japan, exceeded those of Europe and emerging markets. (You can read about Vanguard’s assessment of Japan’s economy in Japan: The Long Road Back to Inflation, available at vanguard.com/research. This is part of the Global Macro Matters series produced by our economists.)
Supply resurgence tempered tax-exempt bond returns
Broadly speaking, both taxable and tax-exempt bonds trade in the marketplace in relation to U.S. Treasury bonds, which establish the level of risk-free interest rates. Changes in investor risk perceptions affect the spread, or the difference between a bond’s interest rate and that of a Treasury bond with a comparable maturity. During the period, there were no major shifts in munis’ value relative to Treasuries.
Another key driver of municipal bond performance is supply—and an increased supply was the main reason the six-month return for the broad municipal market lagged that of Treasuries. Following an extended period of relatively light supply, tax-exempt bond issuance rose by about 52% for the six months through May 2015 compared with the year-ago level (as reported by Barclays). About two-thirds of the bond issuance involved the refunding
| | |
Expense Ratios | | |
Your Fund Compared With Its Peer Group | | |
| | Peer Group |
| Fund | Average |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | 0.16% | 1.09% |
The fund expense ratio shown is from the prospectus dated March 26, 2015, and represents estimated costs for the current fiscal year. For the six months ended May 31, 2015, the fund’s annualized expense ratio was 0.15%. The peer-group expense ratio is derived from data provided by Lipper, a Thomson Reuters Company, and captures information through year-end 2014.
Peer group: Massachusetts Municipal Debt Funds.
4
of outstanding debt, in many cases by issuers who locked in savings in anticipation of rising borrowing costs.
Tax-exempt bond issuance also rose in Massachusetts; however, the increase of about 10% was less than the national pace. Similar to the national trend, a majority of the supply involved refunding of outstanding debt rather than new capital.
Overall demand for municipal bonds remained strong, not only from traditional investors in high income tax brackets but also from nontraditional buyers, such as U.S. banks and insurance companies. Still, issuers needed to offer slightly higher rates to entice buyers, especially for the intermediate-maturity bonds that constitute a large slice of the refunding supply.
At state budget time, a helpful reminder
As you know, investing in the bonds of your home state provides income that can be exempt from federal and state—and sometimes local—income taxes. Depending on your circumstances, this can be a very attractive benefit.
But there’s a tradeoff: less diversification. The performance of your bonds is greatly influenced by the fiscal health of just one state. And that health can be especially evident amid the intense budget debates that often take place before July 1, the start of the new fiscal year in most states.
Just like your personal budget, state and municipal budgets depend on revenue forecasts, and these are often hard to get right. A March report by The Pew Charitable Trusts, for example, found that over roughly the last three decades, “forecasting errors have gotten larger because revenue has become increasingly volatile,” even though “the science of estimating tax collections has improved markedly.” Revenues from corporate income taxes and personal capital gains taxes are especially hard to forecast, Pew noted.
Whether unpleasant budget surprises arise suddenly or from long-simmering challenges such as underfunded pension plans, they can lead to volatile bond returns. As with any investment, it’s not wise to put all your eggs in one basket.
You might consider including a diversified national municipal bond fund in your portfolio. And because Vanguard’s highly experienced team of independent credit analysts carefully evaluates any bond issue we own or are considering for any of our funds, it can help you sidestep some of the potential pitfalls.
Source: The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, March 2015. Managing Volatile Tax Collections in State Revenue Forecasts.
5
Meanwhile, investors’ search for yield in the continued low interest rate environment meant that demand remained relatively strong for the higher rates offered on both longer-maturity and lower-rated bonds.
Against this backdrop, the fund was well-positioned by its advisor, Vanguard Fixed Income Group. A lighter allocation to higher-rated securities (particularly those ranked AAA and AA in credit quality by major rating agencies) and overall issuer selection boosted relative returns.
For more information about the advisor’s approach and the fund’s positioning during the period, please see the Advisor’s Report that follows this letter.
Promoting good corporate governance is one way we protect your interests
Our core purpose is “to take a stand for all investors, to treat them fairly, and to give them the best chance for investment success.” This involves more than offering smart investments, trustworthy guidance, and low fees. It also means working with the companies held by Vanguard funds to make sure your interests remain paramount.
Because promoting good corporate governance supports our core purpose, we want to inform our investors—regardless of which Vanguard fund they may own—about our efforts in this area. As one of the world’s largest investment managers, we are making our voice heard in corporate boardrooms to promote the highest standards of stewardship. Our advocacy encompasses a range of corporate governance issues, including executive compensation and succession planning, board composition and effectiveness, oversight of strategy and risk, and communication with shareholders.
We also exert our influence in a very important way when Vanguard funds cast their proxy votes at companies’ shareholder meetings.
Most of these votes take place at this time of year, making it an appropriate time to remind you that we work hard to represent your best interests. Good governance, we believe, is essential for any company seeking to maximize its long-term returns to shareholders. You can learn more about our efforts at vanguard.com/corporategovernance.
As always, thank you for investing with Vanguard.
Sincerely,
F. William McNabb III
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer June 10, 2015
6
Advisor’s Report
For the six months ended May 31, 2015, Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund returned 0.94%. The fund surpassed its benchmark, the Barclays Massachusetts Municipal Bond Index, which returned 0.69%, and its peer group, which had an average return of 0.86%.
The investment environment
On the heels of an exceptionally strong rally, the municipal bond market began the new fiscal year at what we felt were appropriate valuation levels. Interest rates for taxable and tax-exempt bonds stood at or near historic lows, reflecting expectations that when the Federal Reserve does begin to raise interest rates it will do so modestly and gradually. This was in stark contrast to the bond market’s “taper tantrum” in 2013, when the Fed first announced its intention to scale back its aggressive stimulative bond-buying.
The Fed has made it clear that its decision on when to raise rates depends on the health of the economy. Gross domestic product (GDP) has been a good news/bad news story. Economic growth slowed in the fourth calendar quarter of 2014, and the economy contracted slightly in the first quarter of 2015 (based on preliminary estimates). However, this year’s sharp slowdown is attributable at least in part to transitory factors—another harsh winter and a West Coast port strike. Other contributing factors included the stronger U.S. dollar, which crimps exports, and weaker capital spending in the oil patch.
| | |
Yields of Municipal Securities | | |
(AAA-Rated General-Obligation Issues) | | |
| November 30, | May 31, |
Maturity | 2014 | 2015 |
2 years | 0.14% | 0.22% |
5 years | 0.88 | 1.22 |
10 years | 1.98 | 2.08 |
30 years | 3.00 | 3.15 |
Source: Vanguard. | | |
7
The Fed also wants to see continued improvement in the job market and the unemployment rate, along with an increase in the inflation rate toward the Fed’s 2% long-term target. (Inflation has been running well below that.) The labor market has continued to improve, with the U.S. unemployment rate falling to 5.5% in May. Massachusetts’ labor market improved as well; statewide, unemployment was at 4.6% in May.
Acknowledging recent GDP reports, the Fed signaled in the spring that its first rate increase in almost a decade would likely not come in June, as some had predicted. As a result, the Treasury market broadly continued to rally. The yield of the benchmark 10-year Treasury note, which began the period at 2.25%, dipped to 1.75% at the end of January before closing at 2.14% at the end of May. Overall, the Treasury yield curve flattened modestly as short-term rates crept up.
In contrast, municipal bond yields rose modestly across the maturity spectrum during the period. It’s not unusual for muni bond yields to reach a resistance point, and in this case supply had a lot to do with it.
Massachusetts’ economy continues to recover more quickly than the nation’s as a whole, according to a gauge of current economic conditions for each state published monthly by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. The bank’s index for Massachusetts climbed 23% from its low point in 2009 through May 2015, compared with a 16% increase for the U.S. index.
The commonwealth wasn’t without its challenges. In March, Governor Charlie Baker requested $400 million in federal disaster aid from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) because of the 28 days of record-breaking snowstorms that plagued Massachusetts in January and February. In April, FEMA declared that only one of the storms had been a disaster and awarded only $90 million in aid to about 250 local governments. This put some strain on several cities that had spent well in excess of budgeted amounts for snow removal.
Nonetheless, total Massachusetts state revenue collections for the first ten months of the current fiscal year rose 5.3% year over year; through April 2015, total collection was $20.2 billion, $1.0 billion more than the same period the previous year.
Management of the funds
We made no significant shifts in portfolio strategy or positioning to the Long-Term Fund during the six months. As the year began, we tended to maintain tactical overweights to longer-maturity bonds relative to the fund’s benchmark. For example, more than 70% of fund holdings were bonds with a stated maturity of longer than 10 years, compared with about 55% for the benchmark. This strategy was focused on earning some of the additional income offered by longer-term bonds, and was part of our defensive posture while awaiting the Fed’s first move. Even as longer-term rates seesawed during the period, the strategy served us well.
8
We also added value through security selection, which came in many forms. For example, our general obligation state holdings performed well and exceeded the return of similar holdings included in the benchmark.
In light of the prospect of rising interest rates, we’ve positioned the fund’s duration to be modestly shorter than its benchmark’s. (Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of bond, and bond mutual fund, prices to changes in interest rates.) This decision boosted the fund’s return.
In terms of credit exposure, we overweighted lower-rated investment-grade bonds. In the prolonged environment of low interest rates, these bonds—which offer modestly higher yields—performed well. However, the advantage the fund received from its relatively higher allocation to lower-rated bonds and those of longer maturity was offset by its slightly shorter duration.
We collaborate closely with Vanguard’s experienced team of credit analysts, who perform an objective, thorough, and independent analysis of the overall creditworthiness of these bonds, and of every issuer whose bonds we own or are considering buying. The muni market is large, fragmented, and often inefficient, so our deep credit analysis bench strength is critical to helping to identify bonds that appear mispriced in the marketplace.
A look ahead
As we enter the second half of the fiscal year, we still believe that municipal bonds are trading in an appropriate range relative to their taxable Treasury counterparts. Munis are attractive compared with other U.S. fixed income options.
Just as the U.S. economy rebounded in 2014 from a harsh winter, we expect another rebound this year, with growth reaccelerating to an annual rate of about 2.5% for the rest of the fund’s fiscal year.
Interest rates, and hence bond prices, may remain volatile as the market views new information about the economy’s health through the lens of the data-dependent Fed and tries to guess when it will begin to raise rates. We believe liftoff is likely to come in the second half of 2015, and we believe the Fed may not raise rates over time as much as might have been expected, especially in view of tepid economic growth.
Given the significant drop in interest rates in recent years, and the tightening of credit-quality spreads, many opportunities for price appreciation have already been captured. Lower rates appear unlikely; we don’t see much scope for credit spreads to tighten significantly, nor do we expect them to widen. As a result, we are more focused on opportunities to pick up income by holding lower-rated bonds.
9
In part because of expected volatility, we anticipate maintaining above-average liquidity. That precaution should allow us to take advantage of any price dislocations that may arise as a rate hike approaches and meet potential shareholder redemptions without becoming forced sellers in the market.
Christopher W. Alwine, CFA, Principal, Head of Municipal Bond Funds Marlin G. Brown, Portfolio Manager Vanguard Fixed Income Group June 16, 2015
10
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund
| | | |
Fund Profile | | |
As of May 31, 2015 | | | |
|
Financial Attributes | | |
|
| | Barclays | |
| | MA Barclays |
| | Municipal | Municipal |
| | Bond | Bond |
| Fund | Index | Index |
Number of Bonds | 318 | 1,622 | 47,633 |
Yield to Maturity | | | |
(before expenses) | 2.3% | 2.1% | 2.3% |
Average Coupon | 4.6% | 4.9% | 4.8% |
Average Duration | 6.3 years | 6.6 years | 6.5 years |
Average Stated | | | |
Maturity | 15.8 years | 13.0 years | 13.1 years |
Ticker Symbol | VMATX | — | — |
Expense Ratio1 | 0.16% | — | — |
30-Day SEC Yield | 2.22% | — | — |
Short-Term | | | |
Reserves | 5.0% | — | — |
| | |
Volatility Measures | | |
| Barclays MA | Barclays |
| Municipal | Municipal |
| Bond Index | Bond Index |
R-Squared | 0.99 | 0.99 |
Beta | 1.19 | 1.19 |
These measures show the degree and timing of the fund’s |
fluctuations compared with the indexes over 36 months. |
|
Distribution by Stated Maturity | |
(% of portfolio) | | |
Under 1 Year | | 5.5% |
1 - 3 Years | | 5.5 |
3 - 5 Years | | 4.2 |
5 - 10 Years | | 11.5 |
10 - 20 Years | | 36.7 |
20 - 30 Years | | 33.9 |
Over 30 Years | | 2.7 |
|
Distribution by Credit Quality (% of portfolio) |
AAA | | 18.5% |
AA | | 60.5 |
A | | 12.6 |
BBB | | 8.2 |
Not Rated | | 0.2 |
Credit-quality ratings are obtained from Moody's and S&P, and the higher rating for each issue is shown. "Not Rated" is used to classify securities for which a rating is not available. Not rated securities include a fund's investment in Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund or Vanguard Municipal Cash Management Fund, each of which invests in high-quality money market instruments and may serve as a cash management vehicle for the Vanguard funds, trusts, and accounts. For more information about these ratings, see the Glossary entry for Credit Quality.
Investment Focus
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000932471-15-006639/massachusettstax-exemptx13x1.jpg)
1 The expense ratio shown is from the prospectus dated March 26, 2015, and represents estimated costs for the current fiscal year. For the six months ended May 31, 2015, the annualized expense ratio was 0.15%.
11
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund
Performance Summary
All of the returns in this report represent past performance, which is not a guarantee of future results that may be achieved by the fund. (Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data cited. For performance data current to the most recent month-end, visit our website at vanguard.com/performance.) Note, too, that both investment returns and principal value can fluctuate widely, so an investor’s shares, when sold, could be worth more or less than their original cost. The returns shown do not reflect taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or on the sale of fund shares.
| | | | |
Fiscal-Year Total Returns (%): November 30, 2004, Through May 31, 2015 | |
| | | | Barclays MA |
| | | | Municipal |
| | | | Bond Index |
Fiscal Year | Income Returns | Capital Returns | Total Returns | Total Returns |
2005 | 4.12% | -0.59% | 3.53% | 3.43% |
2006 | 4.38 | 2.16 | 6.54 | 6.13 |
2007 | 4.18 | -2.03 | 2.15 | 3.27 |
2008 | 4.00 | -6.72 | -2.72 | -1.30 |
2009 | 4.42 | 7.94 | 12.36 | 13.60 |
2010 | 3.80 | -0.39 | 3.41 | 3.96 |
2011 | 3.76 | 2.56 | 6.32 | 6.41 |
2012 | 3.49 | 6.92 | 10.41 | 9.57 |
2013 | 3.02 | -7.73 | -4.71 | -3.52 |
2014 | 3.48 | 5.84 | 9.32 | 7.72 |
2015 | 1.53 | -0.59 | 0.94 | 0.69 |
Note: For 2015, performance data reflect the six months ended May 31, 2015. | | |
Average Annual Total Returns: Periods Ended March 31, 2015
This table presents returns through the latest calendar quarter—rather than through the end of the fiscal period.
Securities and Exchange Commission rules require that we provide this information.
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Ten Years |
| Inception Date | One Year | Five Years | Income | Capital | Total |
Massachusetts | | | | | | |
Tax-Exempt Fund | 12/9/1998 | 7.55% | 5.02% | 3.83% | 0.80% | 4.63% |
See Financial Highlights for dividend and capital gains information.
12
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Statement of Net Assets
As of May 31, 2015
The fund reports a complete list of its holdings in regulatory filings four times in each fiscal year, at the quarter-ends. For the second and fourth fiscal quarters, the lists appear in the fund’s semiannual and annual reports to shareholders. For the first and third fiscal quarters, the fund files the lists with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form N-Q. Shareholders can look up the fund’s Forms N-Q on the SEC’s website at sec.gov. Forms N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room (see the back cover of this report for further information).
| | | | |
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds (99.8%) | | | | |
Massachusetts (99.2%) | | | | |
Boston MA GO | 5.000% | 4/1/23 | 3,000 | 3,663 |
Boston MA GO | 5.000% | 2/1/24 | 2,345 | 2,791 |
Boston MA GO | 5.000% | 3/1/24 | 3,000 | 3,626 |
Boston MA Housing Authority Revenue | 5.000% | 4/1/23 (4) | 2,000 | 2,202 |
Boston MA Housing Authority Revenue | 5.000% | 4/1/25 (4) | 5,440 | 5,977 |
Boston MA Water & Sewer Commission Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/20 | 1,550 | 1,824 |
Boston MA Water & Sewer Commission Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/25 | 3,725 | 4,236 |
Boston MA Water & Sewer Commission Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/30 | 1,000 | 1,133 |
Boston MA Water & Sewer Commission Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/30 | 750 | 858 |
Braintree MA GO | 5.000% | 5/15/19 (Prere.) | 4,000 | 4,579 |
Braintree MA GO | 5.000% | 5/15/26 | 2,300 | 2,810 |
Cambridge MA GO | 5.000% | 1/1/23 | 850 | 1,011 |
Cambridge MA GO | 4.000% | 1/1/25 | 1,000 | 1,147 |
Cambridge MA GO | 4.000% | 1/1/26 | 1,600 | 1,808 |
Cambridge MA GO | 4.000% | 1/1/27 | 1,000 | 1,116 |
Holyoke MA GO | 5.000% | 9/1/30 | 1,690 | 1,929 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Assessment Revenue | 5.250% | 7/1/31 | 2,285 | 2,897 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Assessment Revenue | 5.250% | 7/1/34 | 18,000 | 20,056 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Assessment Revenue | 5.000% | 7/1/41 | 5,000 | 5,550 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.500% | 7/1/17 (ETM) | 75 | 82 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.250% | 7/1/22 | 3,500 | 4,259 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.500% | 7/1/22 | 5,285 | 6,518 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 7/1/23 | 4,000 | 4,847 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.250% | 7/1/23 | 2,825 | 3,480 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.500% | 7/1/24 | 3,020 | 3,823 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.500% | 7/1/26 (14) | 2,000 | 2,531 |
13
| | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 7/1/27 | 5,000 | 6,107 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 0.000% | 7/1/29 | 1,020 | 546 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.250% | 7/1/32 | 2,900 | 3,647 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.250% | 7/1/33 | 5,000 | 6,328 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.250% | 7/1/33 | 2,000 | 2,531 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 7/1/35 | 2,145 | 2,429 |
1 Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue TOB VRDO | 0.200% | 6/5/15 | 2,887 | 2,886 |
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | | | | |
Sales Tax Revenue VRDO | 0.100% | 6/5/15 | 1,100 | 1,100 |
Massachusetts Clean Energy Cooperative Corp. | | | | |
Revenue (Municipal Lighting Plant) | 5.000% | 7/1/26 | 2,875 | 3,370 |
Massachusetts Clean Energy Cooperative Corp. | | | | |
Revenue (Municipal Lighting Plant) | 5.000% | 7/1/29 | 3,300 | 3,786 |
Massachusetts Clean Energy Cooperative Corp. | | | | |
Revenue (Municipal Lighting Plant) | 5.000% | 7/1/32 | 2,500 | 2,828 |
Massachusetts Clean Water Trust Revenue | 5.000% | 2/1/28 | 3,000 | 3,539 |
Massachusetts Clean Water Trust Revenue | 5.000% | 2/1/35 | 3,000 | 3,435 |
Massachusetts Clean Water Trust Revenue | 5.000% | 2/1/45 | 2,085 | 2,355 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 0.000% | 5/1/17 (10) | 3,340 | 3,269 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/25 | 1,100 | 1,305 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/26 | 1,430 | 1,683 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/27 | 1,200 | 1,400 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/29 | 1,500 | 1,722 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/30 | 1,610 | 1,846 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/30 | 1,075 | 1,218 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/31 | 2,000 | 2,306 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/34 | 3,290 | 3,799 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/36 | 4,000 | 4,460 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/39 | 3,000 | 3,381 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/41 | 5,000 | 5,529 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/43 | 3,285 | 3,626 |
Massachusetts College Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 4.500% | 5/1/48 | 3,000 | 3,138 |
14
| | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
Massachusetts Department of Transportation | | | | |
Metropolitan Highway System Revenue | 5.000% | 1/1/20 | 3,500 | 4,014 |
Massachusetts Department of Transportation | | | | |
Metropolitan Highway System Revenue | 5.000% | 1/1/23 | 3,000 | 3,442 |
Massachusetts Department of Transportation | | | | |
Metropolitan Highway System Revenue | 5.000% | 1/1/32 | 5,620 | 6,249 |
Massachusetts Department of Transportation | | | | |
Metropolitan Highway System Revenue | 5.000% | 1/1/35 | 2,350 | 2,647 |
Massachusetts Department of Transportation | | | | |
Metropolitan Highway System Revenue | 5.000% | 1/1/37 | 3,000 | 3,293 |
Massachusetts Department of Transportation | | | | |
Metropolitan Highway System Revenue VRDO | 0.080% | 6/5/15 | 6,000 | 6,000 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Higher Education Revenue (Emerson College) | 5.000% | 1/1/17 (Prere.) | 2,000 | 2,136 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Higher Education Revenue (Emerson College) | 5.000% | 1/1/17 (Prere.) | 3,105 | 3,317 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Higher Education Revenue (Emerson College) | 5.000% | 1/1/17 (Prere.) | 1,985 | 2,120 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Hospital Revenue (Cape Cod Healthcare | | | | |
Obligated Group) | 5.250% | 11/15/36 | 5,130 | 5,640 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Baystate Medical Obligated Group) | 5.000% | 7/1/34 | 1,500 | 1,659 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Berklee College of Music) | 5.250% | 10/1/41 | 3,300 | 3,677 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Berkshire Health System) | 5.000% | 10/1/22 | 2,000 | 2,259 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Berkshire Health System) | 5.000% | 10/1/28 | 1,250 | 1,372 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Berkshire Health System) | 5.000% | 10/1/29 | 1,500 | 1,642 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Berkshire Health System) | 5.000% | 10/1/30 | 1,430 | 1,561 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Berkshire Health System) | 5.000% | 10/1/31 | 1,250 | 1,359 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston College) | 5.000% | 7/1/19 | 500 | 574 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston College) | 5.000% | 7/1/40 | 2,000 | 2,240 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston Medical Center) | 5.000% | 7/1/22 (Prere.) | 470 | 564 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston Medical Center) | 5.000% | 7/1/22 (Prere.) | 2,995 | 3,581 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston Medical Center) | 5.000% | 7/1/29 | 2,535 | 2,752 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston Medical Center) | 5.000% | 7/1/44 | 2,000 | 2,132 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston University) | 6.000% | 5/15/29 (2) | 1,400 | 1,716 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston University) | 5.000% | 10/1/35 (2) | 2,000 | 2,027 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston University) | 5.375% | 5/15/39 | 1,575 | 1,911 |
15
| | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston University) | 5.000% | 7/1/42 | 10,000 | 10,734 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston University) | 5.000% | 10/1/48 | 7,400 | 8,174 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston University) | 6.000% | 5/15/59 (10) | 5,575 | 6,820 |
2 Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Boston University) PUT | 0.680% | 3/30/17 | 5,000 | 5,004 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Broad Institute Inc.) | 5.250% | 4/1/37 | 4,000 | 4,504 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Carleton-Willard Village) | 5.250% | 12/1/25 | 600 | 665 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Carleton-Willard Village) | 5.625% | 12/1/30 | 550 | 617 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Children’s Hospital) | 5.000% | 10/1/34 | 2,440 | 2,748 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Children’s Hospital) | 5.000% | 10/1/46 | 5,500 | 6,082 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (College of the Holy Cross) VRDO | 0.100% | 6/1/15 LOC | 2,230 | 2,230 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Commonwealth Contract Assistance) | 5.500% | 2/1/40 | 2,160 | 2,481 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Deerfield Academy) | 5.000% | 10/1/40 | 4,665 | 5,337 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Draper Laboratory) | 5.750% | 9/1/18 (Prere.) | 5,000 | 5,733 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Emerson College) | 5.000% | 1/1/35 | 3,000 | 3,193 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Emerson College) | 5.000% | 1/1/40 | 5,000 | 5,248 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Harvard University) | 5.000% | 10/15/28 | 1,000 | 1,162 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Harvard University) | 5.250% | 2/1/34 | 6,000 | 7,024 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Harvard University) | 5.000% | 10/15/40 | 9,790 | 11,104 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Lawrence General Hospital) | 5.250% | 7/1/34 | 2,245 | 2,373 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Loomis Obligated Group) | 6.000% | 1/1/33 | 4,000 | 4,433 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Lowell General Hospital) | 5.000% | 7/1/37 | 4,800 | 5,064 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Lowell General Hospital) | 5.000% | 7/1/44 | 5,000 | 5,223 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy | | | | |
& Allied Health Sciences) | 5.000% | 7/1/19 | 175 | 199 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy | | | | |
& Allied Health Sciences) | 5.000% | 7/1/21 | 300 | 352 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy | | | | |
& Allied Health Sciences) | 5.000% | 7/1/23 | 250 | 298 |
16
| | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy | | | | |
& Allied Health Sciences) | 5.000% | 7/1/26 | 1,380 | 1,599 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (MCPHS University) | 5.000% | 7/1/31 | 400 | 458 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (MCPHS University) | 5.000% | 7/1/32 | 300 | 342 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (MCPHS University) | 5.000% | 7/1/37 | 450 | 509 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Merrimack College) | 5.000% | 7/1/32 | 2,000 | 2,106 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Merrimack College) | 5.250% | 7/1/42 | 1,470 | 1,547 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Merrimack College) | 5.125% | 7/1/44 | 2,500 | 2,634 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Milford Regional Medical Center) | 5.750% | 7/15/43 | 6,755 | 7,406 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Mount Holyoke College) | 5.000% | 7/1/36 | 1,500 | 1,645 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Northeastern University) | 5.000% | 10/1/29 | 3,250 | 3,652 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Northeastern University) | 5.000% | 10/1/30 | 1,750 | 1,957 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Northeastern University) | 5.000% | 3/1/32 | 950 | 1,067 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Northeastern University) | 5.000% | 3/1/39 | 3,500 | 3,893 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Northeastern University) | 5.000% | 3/1/44 | 3,750 | 4,144 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Olin College) | 5.000% | 11/1/38 | 6,000 | 6,688 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Partners Healthcare) | 5.000% | 7/1/28 | 2,000 | 2,275 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Partners Healthcare) | 5.000% | 7/1/30 | 1,500 | 1,692 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Partners Healthcare) | 5.000% | 7/1/31 | 5,705 | 6,406 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Partners Healthcare) | 5.000% | 7/1/36 | 4,000 | 4,444 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Partners Healthcare) | 5.000% | 7/1/40 | 3,000 | 3,369 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Partners Healthcare) | 5.375% | 7/1/41 | 4,000 | 4,489 |
2 Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Partners Healthcare) PUT | 0.650% | 1/30/18 | 7,945 | 7,946 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Phillips Academy) | 5.000% | 9/1/38 | 1,545 | 1,749 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Phillips Academy) | 5.000% | 9/1/43 | 2,500 | 2,816 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Seven Hills Foundation | | | | |
Obligated Group) | 5.000% | 9/1/35 | 3,000 | 3,162 |
17
| | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Seven Hills Foundation | | | | |
Obligated Group) | 5.000% | 9/1/45 | 2,000 | 2,088 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Simmons College) | 5.500% | 10/1/28 | 1,000 | 1,136 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Simmons College) | 5.125% | 10/1/33 | 2,000 | 2,177 |
3 Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Simmons College) | 5.000% | 10/1/36 | 2,000 | 2,140 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Simmons College) | 5.250% | 10/1/39 | 3,000 | 3,264 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Southcoast Health System | | | | |
Obligated Group) | 5.000% | 7/1/27 | 1,550 | 1,759 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Suffolk University) | 5.000% | 7/1/30 | 3,000 | 3,184 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Suffolk University) | 5.125% | 7/1/40 | 3,000 | 3,148 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Tufts Medical Center) | 7.250% | 1/1/32 | 2,500 | 2,985 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Tufts Medical Center) | 6.750% | 1/1/36 | 850 | 988 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Tufts Medical Center) | 6.875% | 1/1/41 | 2,000 | 2,328 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Tufts University) | 5.000% | 8/15/38 | 1,000 | 1,140 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (UMass Memorial Medical Center) | 5.000% | 7/1/16 | 150 | 156 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (UMass Memorial Medical Center) | 5.125% | 7/1/26 | 2,750 | 3,021 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (UMass Memorial Medical Center) | 5.500% | 7/1/31 | 5,250 | 5,773 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Wellesley College) | 5.000% | 7/1/42 | 2,000 | 2,265 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (WGBH Educational Foundation) | 5.000% | 1/1/36 (12) | 5,000 | 5,362 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Williams College) | 5.000% | 7/1/38 | 4,000 | 4,531 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Williams College) | 5.000% | 7/1/43 | 3,000 | 3,373 |
2 Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Williams College) PUT | 0.380% | 7/1/17 | 5,000 | 5,001 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Revenue (Worcester Polytechnic Institute) | 5.000% | 9/1/50 | 2,650 | 2,894 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Special Obligation Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/34 | 1,295 | 1,456 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Special Obligation Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/39 | 6,470 | 7,196 |
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency | | | | |
Special Obligation Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/39 | 1,000 | 1,112 |
Massachusetts Educational Financing Authority | | | | |
Education Loan Revenue | 5.500% | 1/1/17 | 3,000 | 3,214 |
Massachusetts Federal Highway GAN | | | | |
(Accelerated Bridge Program) | 5.000% | 6/15/26 | 3,000 | 3,554 |
18
| | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
Massachusetts Federal Highway Revenue | 5.000% | 6/15/27 | 6,000 | 7,150 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.250% | 8/1/17 (Prere.) | 1,500 | 1,644 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.500% | 11/1/17 | 3,000 | 3,335 |
2 Massachusetts GO | 0.530% | 1/1/18 | 5,000 | 5,000 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 8/1/18 (Prere.) | 4,185 | 4,693 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 8/1/18 (Prere.) | 4,500 | 5,046 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.500% | 8/1/19 | 5,000 | 5,844 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.500% | 10/1/19 (12) | 1,000 | 1,174 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.500% | 10/1/19 (2) | 2,000 | 2,347 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.500% | 11/1/19 (4) | 5,550 | 6,527 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 8/1/21 | 5,000 | 5,926 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 8/1/22 | 4,400 | 5,277 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.250% | 8/1/22 | 5,000 | 6,080 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.250% | 8/1/23 | 1,000 | 1,233 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 11/1/23 | 4,000 | 4,853 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 6/1/24 | 3,615 | 4,184 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 7/1/24 | 5,765 | 6,857 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.250% | 9/1/24 (4) | 7,800 | 9,730 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 6/1/25 | 3,000 | 3,472 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 7/1/25 | 9,000 | 10,704 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 7/1/26 | 9,000 | 10,588 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 8/1/26 | 6,500 | 7,669 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 8/1/28 | 4,535 | 5,035 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.500% | 8/1/30 (2) | 9,330 | 11,867 |
Massachusetts GO | 4.000% | 8/1/32 | 5,000 | 5,228 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 8/1/32 (2) | 1,250 | 1,356 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 8/1/33 | 2,000 | 2,279 |
Massachusetts GO | 4.000% | 5/1/35 | 5,000 | 5,165 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 8/1/36 | 9,000 | 10,138 |
Massachusetts GO | 5.000% | 8/1/37 | 5,000 | 5,620 |
Massachusetts GO | 4.000% | 6/1/42 | 8,000 | 8,160 |
Massachusetts GO | 4.000% | 6/1/43 | 7,820 | 7,991 |
Massachusetts GO | 4.500% | 8/1/43 | 3,705 | 3,932 |
1 Massachusetts GO TOB VRDO | 0.100% | 6/1/15 | 900 | 900 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Baystate Medical Center) | | | | |
VRDO | 0.080% | 6/1/15 LOC | 900 | 900 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Berklee College of Music) | 5.000% | 10/1/26 | 1,755 | 1,900 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Boston Medical Center) | 5.000% | 7/1/18 (Prere.) | 315 | 352 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Boston Medical Center) | 5.000% | 7/1/28 | 2,685 | 2,826 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Caregroup) | 5.000% | 7/1/28 | 2,000 | 2,200 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Caregroup) | 5.125% | 7/1/33 | 3,015 | 3,216 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Caregroup) | 5.125% | 7/1/38 | 3,500 | 3,721 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Children’s Hospital) | 5.500% | 12/1/39 | 4,000 | 4,566 |
| | | | |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute) | 5.000% | 12/1/37 | 5,000 | 5,424 |
19
| | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Harvard University) | 6.250% | 4/1/20 | 3,000 | 3,679 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Harvard University) | 5.000% | 12/15/21 | 2,000 | 2,400 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Harvard University) | 5.000% | 12/15/24 | 810 | 941 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Harvard University) | 5.000% | 12/15/30 | 925 | 1,061 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Harvard University) | 5.500% | 11/15/36 | 16,000 | 18,294 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Isabella Stewart Gardner | | | | |
Museum) | 5.000% | 5/1/27 | 1,650 | 1,856 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Isabella Stewart Gardner | | | | |
Museum) | 5.000% | 5/1/28 | 2,080 | 2,329 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Lahey Clinic Medical Center) | 5.250% | 8/15/37 | 6,650 | 7,030 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (MIT) | 5.000% | 7/1/17 (Prere.) | 3,500 | 3,808 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (MIT) | 5.250% | 7/1/25 | 3,605 | 4,556 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (MIT) | 5.250% | 7/1/30 | 3,000 | 3,840 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Museum of Fine Arts) VRDO | 0.070% | 6/1/15 | 9,400 | 9,400 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Museum of Fine Arts) VRDO | 0.120% | 6/1/15 | 9,880 | 9,880 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Northeastern University) | 5.000% | 10/1/19 | 3,000 | 3,426 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Northeastern University) | 5.000% | 10/1/23 | 3,435 | 3,819 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Northeastern University) | 5.000% | 10/1/32 | 1,000 | 1,113 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Northeastern University) | 5.000% | 10/1/33 | 3,000 | 3,295 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Partners Healthcare System) | 5.250% | 7/1/29 | 10,000 | 11,409 |
1 Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Partners Healthcare System) | | | | |
TOB VRDO | 0.110% | 6/5/15 | 1,800 | 1,800 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Partners Healthcare System) | | | | |
VRDO | 0.090% | 6/5/15 | 2,100 | 2,100 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Simmons College) | 8.000% | 10/1/15 (Prere.) | 1,025 | 1,052 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Simmons College) | 8.000% | 10/1/15 (Prere.) | 1,475 | 1,513 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (South Coast Health System) | 5.000% | 7/1/39 | 6,000 | 6,446 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Sterling & Francine Clark) | 5.000% | 7/1/36 | 6,200 | 6,474 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Tufts University) | 5.250% | 2/15/22 | 1,400 | 1,693 |
20
| | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Tufts University) | 5.250% | 2/15/26 | 1,880 | 2,315 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Tufts University) VRDO | 0.080% | 6/1/15 | 11,620 | 11,620 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Wellesley College) VRDO | 0.070% | 6/5/15 | 10,000 | 10,000 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Williams College) | 5.000% | 7/1/31 | 385 | 402 |
Massachusetts Health & Educational Facilities | | | | |
Authority Revenue (Winchester Hospital) | 5.250% | 7/1/38 | 2,840 | 3,125 |
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency Single | | | | |
Family Housing Revenue | 2.650% | 12/1/41 | 4,775 | 4,899 |
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency Single | | | | |
Family Housing Revenue | 2.750% | 12/1/41 | 1,455 | 1,491 |
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency Single | | | | |
Family Housing Revenue | 4.000% | 12/1/43 | 3,805 | 4,076 |
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency Single | | | | |
Family Housing Revenue | 4.000% | 12/1/44 | 3,400 | 3,669 |
Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency Single | | | | |
Family Housing Revenue | 4.000% | 6/1/45 | 1,750 | 1,891 |
Massachusetts Port Authority Revenue | 5.500% | 7/1/16 (4) | 4,000 | 4,222 |
Massachusetts Port Authority Revenue | 5.000% | 7/1/17 (4) | 3,000 | 3,260 |
Massachusetts Port Authority Revenue | 5.000% | 7/1/25 | 1,230 | 1,453 |
Massachusetts Port Authority Revenue | 5.000% | 7/1/30 | 2,000 | 2,296 |
Massachusetts Port Authority Revenue | 5.000% | 7/1/31 | 1,800 | 2,059 |
Massachusetts Port Authority Revenue | 5.000% | 7/1/33 | 4,650 | 5,288 |
Massachusetts Port Authority Revenue | 5.000% | 7/1/34 | 3,845 | 4,377 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 8/15/15 (Prere.) | 645 | 651 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 8/15/15 (Prere.) | 2,500 | 2,525 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 8/15/22 | 5,000 | 5,995 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 8/15/25 | 3,110 | 3,694 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 8/15/26 | 5,000 | 5,921 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 8/15/27 | 10,000 | 11,786 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 8/15/28 | 7,250 | 8,545 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 8/15/29 | 10,000 | 11,582 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 8/15/30 | 8,000 | 9,211 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 10/15/32 | 2,400 | 2,737 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.250% | 10/15/35 | 10,000 | 11,487 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 4.000% | 1/15/37 | 3,000 | 3,062 |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 8/15/37 (2) | 4,735 | 5,097 |
21
| | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
Massachusetts School Building Authority | | | | |
Dedicated Sales Tax Revenue | 5.000% | 5/15/38 | 2,660 | 2,986 |
Massachusetts Special Obligation Dedicated | | | | |
Tax Revenue | 5.500% | 1/1/27 (14) | 13,000 | 16,161 |
Massachusetts Special Obligation Dedicated | | | | |
Tax Revenue | 5.500% | 1/1/28 (14) | 3,750 | 4,660 |
Massachusetts Transportation Fund Revenue | | | | |
(Accelerated Bridge Program) | 5.000% | 6/1/21 | 5,000 | 5,908 |
Massachusetts Transportation Fund Revenue | | | | |
(Accelerated Bridge Program) | 5.000% | 6/1/29 | 2,000 | 2,313 |
Massachusetts Transportation Fund Revenue | | | | |
(Accelerated Bridge Program) | 5.000% | 6/1/33 | 2,050 | 2,348 |
Massachusetts Transportation Fund Revenue | | | | |
(Accelerated Bridge Program) | 4.000% | 6/1/37 | 1,960 | 2,020 |
Massachusetts Transportation Fund Revenue | | | | |
(Accelerated Bridge Program) | 5.000% | 6/1/38 | 2,750 | 3,090 |
Massachusetts Transportation Fund Revenue | | | | |
(Accelerated Bridge Program) | 5.000% | 6/1/43 | 5,000 | 5,602 |
Massachusetts Transportation Fund Revenue | | | | |
(Accelerated Bridge Program) | 5.000% | 6/1/44 | 5,000 | 5,691 |
Massachusetts Turnpike Authority Revenue | | | | |
(Metropolitan Highway System) | 0.000% | 1/1/20 (14) | 3,000 | 2,768 |
Massachusetts Turnpike Authority Revenue | | | | |
(Metropolitan Highway System) | 0.000% | 1/1/25 (14) | 5,000 | 3,848 |
Massachusetts Turnpike Authority Revenue | | | | |
(Metropolitan Highway System) | 0.000% | 1/1/28 (14) | 6,000 | 4,073 |
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement | | | | |
Trust Revenue | 5.250% | 8/1/17 | 540 | 545 |
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement | | | | |
Trust Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/22 | 3,000 | 3,625 |
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement | | | | |
Trust Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/25 | 2,500 | 3,114 |
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement | | | | |
Trust Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/27 | 8,000 | 9,608 |
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement | | | | |
Trust Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/28 | 975 | 1,161 |
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement | | | | |
Trust Revenue | 5.250% | 8/1/29 | 1,520 | 1,931 |
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement | | | | |
Trust Revenue | 5.750% | 8/1/29 | 190 | 191 |
Massachusetts Water Pollution Abatement | | | | |
Trust Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/32 | 2,415 | 2,781 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/16 (Prere.) | 2,005 | 2,113 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/16 (Prere.) | 2,995 | 3,156 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/16 (Prere.) | 5,990 | 6,301 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/17 (Prere.) | 500 | 545 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.500% | 8/1/20 (4) | 1,000 | 1,198 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.500% | 8/1/22 (4) | 1,490 | 1,845 |
22
| | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/24 | 5,000 | 6,114 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/27 | 2,000 | 2,316 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/29 | 2,400 | 2,746 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/30 | 2,775 | 3,200 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/31 | 2,230 | 2,563 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.250% | 8/1/31 (4) | 1,000 | 1,256 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/34 (14) | 7,500 | 8,077 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/35 (14) | 13,900 | 14,995 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.250% | 8/1/35 (4) | 1,310 | 1,642 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/36 | 2,710 | 3,064 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/36 | 1,700 | 1,782 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/36 | 1,000 | 1,126 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/39 | 2,950 | 3,315 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/40 | 500 | 569 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/41 | 4,450 | 4,981 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/42 | 1,000 | 1,108 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.250% | 8/1/42 | 10,000 | 11,283 |
Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 8/1/44 | 8,000 | 9,035 |
1 Massachusetts Water Resources Authority | | | | |
Revenue TOB VRDO | 0.100% | 6/5/15 LOC | 2,000 | 2,000 |
Metropolitan Boston MA Transit Parking Corp. | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 7/1/31 | 1,000 | 1,135 |
Metropolitan Boston MA Transit Parking Corp. | | | | |
Revenue | 5.250% | 7/1/36 | 7,000 | 7,947 |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/15 (Prere.) | 2,695 | 2,749 |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/15 (Prere.) | 1,760 | 1,795 |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/15 (Prere.) | 1,980 | 2,019 |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/15 (Prere.) | 1,990 | 2,030 |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/31 | 2,500 | 2,937 |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/32 | 4,060 | 4,762 |
23
| | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | |
|
|
|
| | | Face | Market |
| | Maturity | Amount | Value• |
| Coupon | Date | ($000) | ($000) |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/38 | 2,000 | 2,232 |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 5/1/38 (4) | 1,615 | 1,767 |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/39 | 6,695 | 7,471 |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/39 | 3,000 | 3,402 |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 5.000% | 11/1/40 | 3,000 | 3,418 |
University of Massachusetts Building Authority | | | | |
Revenue | 4.000% | 11/1/45 | 2,000 | 2,008 |
Worcester MA GO | 5.500% | 8/15/15 (14) | 240 | 241 |
Worcester MA GO | 5.250% | 8/15/21 (14) | 315 | 316 |
| | | | 1,209,290 |
Guam (0.2%) | | | | |
Guam Government Waterworks Authority Water | | | | |
& Waste Water System Revenue | 5.500% | 7/1/43 | 2,250 | 2,548 |
|
Virgin Islands (0.4%) | | | | |
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority Revenue | 5.000% | 10/1/30 | 4,000 | 4,387 |
Total Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds (Cost $1,162,141) | | | 1,216,225 |
Other Assets and Liabilities (0.2%) | | | | |
Other Assets | | | | 16,798 |
Liabilities | | | | (13,799) |
| | | | 2,999 |
Net Assets (100%) | | | | |
Applicable to 113,550,158 outstanding $.001 par value shares of | | | |
beneficial interest (unlimited authorization) | | | | 1,219,224 |
Net Asset Value Per Share | | | | $10.74 |
|
|
At May 31, 2015, net assets consisted of: | | | | |
| | | | Amount |
| | | | ($000) |
Paid-in Capital | | | | 1,165,607 |
Undistributed Net Investment Income | | | | — |
Accumulated Net Realized Losses | | | | (467) |
Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | | | | 54,084 |
Net Assets | | | | 1,219,224 |
- See Note A in Notes to Financial Statements.
- Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. Such securities may be sold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers. At May 31, 2015, the aggregate value of these securities was $7,586,000, representing 0.6% of net assets.
- Adjustable-rate security.
- Security purchased on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis for which the fund has not taken delivery as of May 31, 2015. A key to abbreviations and other references follows the Statement of Net Assets.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
24
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund
Key to Abbreviations
ARS—Auction Rate Security.
BAN—Bond Anticipation Note.
COP—Certificate of Participation.
CP—Commercial Paper.
FR—Floating Rate.
GAN—Grant Anticipation Note.
GO—General Obligation Bond.
PILOT—Payments in Lieu of Taxes.
PUT—Put Option Obligation.
RAN—Revenue Anticipation Note.
TAN—Tax Anticipation Note.
TOB—Tender Option Bond.
TRAN—Tax Revenue Anticipation Note.
VRDO—Variable Rate Demand Obligation.
VRDP—Variable Rate Demand Preferred.
(ETM)—Escrowed to Maturity.
(Prere.)—Prerefunded.
Scheduled principal and interest payments are guaranteed by: (1) MBIA (Municipal Bond Investors Assurance).
(2) AMBAC (Ambac Assurance Corporation).
(3) FGIC (Financial Guaranty Insurance Company). (4) AGM (Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation). (5) BIGI (Bond Investors Guaranty Insurance).
(6) Connie Lee Inc.
(7) FHA (Federal Housing Authority).
(8) CapMAC (Capital Markets Assurance Corporation).
(9) American Capital Access Financial Guaranty Corporation. (10) XL Capital Assurance Inc.
(11) CIFG (CDC IXIS Financial Guaranty). (12) AGC (Assured Guaranty Corporation).
(13) BHAC (Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corporation). (14) NPFG (National Public Finance Guarantee Corporation). (15) BAM (Build America Mutual Assurance Company). (16) MAC (Municipal Assurance Corporation).
(17) RAA (Radian Asset Assurance Inc.).
The insurance does not guarantee the market value of the municipal bonds.
LOC—Scheduled principal and interest payments are guaranteed by bank letter of credit.
25
| |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | |
|
|
Statement of Operations | |
|
| Six Months Ended |
| May 31, 2015 |
| ($000) |
Investment Income | |
Income | |
Interest | 19,218 |
Total Income | 19,218 |
Expenses | |
The Vanguard Group—Note B | |
Investment Advisory Services | 57 |
Management and Administrative | 719 |
Marketing and Distribution | 108 |
Custodian Fees | 7 |
Shareholders’ Reports | 4 |
Total Expenses | 895 |
Net Investment Income | 18,323 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | |
Investment Securities Sold | 378 |
Futures Contracts | (4) |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | 374 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Investment Securities | (8,076) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 10,621 |
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
26
| | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | |
|
|
Statement of Changes in Net Assets | | |
|
| Six Months Ended | Year Ended |
| May 31, | November 30, |
| 2015 | 2014 |
| ($000) | ($000) |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | | |
Operations | | |
Net Investment Income | 18,323 | 34,635 |
Realized Net Gain (Loss) | 374 | 7,373 |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) | (8,076) | 51,523 |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Resulting from Operations | 10,621 | 93,531 |
Distributions | | |
Net Investment Income | (18,323) | (34,635) |
Realized Capital Gain1 | (7,117) | — |
Total Distributions | (25,440) | (34,635) |
Capital Share Transactions | | |
Issued | 135,823 | 205,583 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 18,928 | 24,623 |
Redeemed | (69,109) | (142,017) |
Net Increase (Decrease) from Capital Share Transactions | 85,642 | 88,189 |
Total Increase (Decrease) | 70,823 | 147,085 |
Net Assets | | |
Beginning of Period | 1,148,401 | 1,001,316 |
End of Period | 1,219,224 | 1,148,401 |
1 Includes fiscal 2015 short-term gain distributions totaling $1,785,000. Short-term gain distributions are treated as ordinary income dividends for tax purposes.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
27
| | | | | | |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | | | | | | |
|
|
Financial Highlights | | | | | | |
|
|
Six Months | | | | | |
| Ended | | | | | |
For a Share Outstanding | May 31, | | | Year Ended November 30, |
Throughout Each Period | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 |
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $10.87 | $10.27 | $11.13 | $10.41 | $10.15 | $10.19 |
Investment Operations | | | | | | |
Net Investment Income | .166 | .345 | .340 | .349 | .366 | .386 |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | | | | | | |
on Investments | (. 063) | . 600 | (. 860) | .720 | . 260 | (. 040) |
Total from Investment Operations | .103 | .945 | (.520) | 1.069 | .626 | .346 |
Distributions | | | | | | |
Dividends from Net Investment Income | (.166) | (. 345) | (. 340) | (. 349) | (. 366) | (. 386) |
Distributions from Realized Capital Gains | (.067) | — | — | — | — | — |
Total Distributions | (. 233) | (. 345) | (. 340) | (. 349) | (. 366) | (. 386) |
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $10.74 | $10.87 | $10.27 | $11.13 | $10.41 | $10.15 |
|
Total Return1 | 0.94% | 9.32% | -4.71% | 10.41% | 6.32% | 3.41% |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data | | | | | | |
Net Assets, End of Period (Millions) | $1,219 | $1,148 | $1,001 | $1,127 | $942 | $983 |
Ratio of Total Expenses to | | | | | | |
Average Net Assets | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.16% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
Ratio of Net Investment Income to | | | | | | |
Average Net Assets | 3.06% | 3.24% | 3.21% | 3.22% | 3.61% | 3.75% |
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 8% | 27% | 36% | 13% | 13% | 18% |
The expense ratio, net income ratio, and turnover rate for the current period have been annualized.
1 Total returns do not include account service fees that may have applied in the periods shown. Fund prospectuses provide information about any applicable account service fees.
See accompanying Notes, which are an integral part of the Financial Statements.
28
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund
Notes to Financial Statements
Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end investment company, or mutual fund. The fund invests in debt instruments of municipal issuers whose ability to meet their obligations may be affected by economic and political developments in the state.
A. The following significant accounting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles for U.S. investment companies. The fund consistently follows such policies in preparing its financial statements.
1. Security Valuation: Securities are valued as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (generally 4 p.m., Eastern time) on the valuation date. Bonds, and temporary cash investments acquired over 60 days to maturity, are valued using the latest bid prices or using valuations based on a matrix system (which considers such factors as security prices, yields, maturities, and ratings), both as furnished by independent pricing services. Other temporary cash investments are valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or whose values have been affected by events occurring before the fund’s pricing time but after the close of the securities’ primary markets, are valued by methods deemed by the board of trustees to represent fair value.
2. Futures Contracts: The fund uses futures contracts to invest in fixed income asset classes with greater efficiency and lower cost than is possible through direct investment, to add value when these instruments are attractively priced, or to adjust sensitivity to changes in interest rates. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are imperfect correlation between changes in market values of bonds held by the fund and the prices of futures contracts, and the possibility of an illiquid market. Counterparty risk involving futures is mitigated because a regulated clearinghouse is the counterparty instead of the clearing broker. To further mitigate counterparty risk, the fund trades futures contracts on an exchange, monitors the financial strength of its clearing brokers and clearinghouse, and has entered into clearing agreements with its clearing brokers. The clearinghouse imposes initial margin requirements to secure the fund’s performance and requires daily settlement of variation margin representing changes in the market value of each contract.
Futures contracts are valued at their quoted daily settlement prices. The aggregate settlement values of the contracts are not recorded in the Statement of Net Assets. Fluctuations in the value of the contracts are recorded in the Statement of Net Assets as an asset (liability) and in the Statement of Operations as unrealized appreciation (depreciation) until the contracts are closed, when they are recorded as realized futures gains (losses).
During the six months ended May 31, 2015, the fund’s average investments in long and short futures contracts each represented less than 1% of net assets, based on the average of aggregate settlement values at each quarter-end during the period. The fund had no open futures contracts at May 31, 2015.
3. Federal Income Taxes: The fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company and distribute all of its income. Management has analyzed the fund’s tax positions taken for all open federal income tax years (November 30, 2011–2014), and for the period ended May 31, 2015, and has concluded that no provision for federal income tax is required in the fund’s financial statements.
4. Distributions: Distributions from net investment income are declared daily and paid on the first business day of the following month. Annual distributions from realized capital gains, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
29
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund
5. Credit Facility: The fund and certain other funds managed by The Vanguard Group participate in a $3 billion committed credit facility provided by a syndicate of lenders pursuant to a credit agreement that may be renewed annually; each fund is individually liable for its borrowings, if any, under the credit facility. Borrowings may be utilized for temporary and emergency purposes, and are subject to the fund’s regulatory and contractual borrowing restrictions. The participating funds are charged administrative fees and an annual commitment fee of 0.06% of the undrawn amount of the facility; these fees are allocated to the funds based on a method approved by the fund’s board of trustees and included in Management and Administrative expenses on the fund’s Statement of Operations. Any borrowings under this facility bear interest at a rate equal to the higher of the federal funds rate or LIBOR reference rate plus an agreed-upon spread.
The fund had no borrowings outstanding at May 31, 2015, or at any time during the period then ended.
6. Other: Interest income is accrued daily. Premiums and discounts on debt securities purchased are amortized and accreted, respectively, to interest income over the lives of the respective securities. Security transactions are accounted for on the date securities are bought or sold. Costs used to determine realized gains (losses) on the sale of investment securities are those of the specific securities sold.
B. The Vanguard Group furnishes at cost investment advisory, corporate management, administrative, marketing, and distribution services. The costs of such services are allocated to the fund based on methods approved by the board of trustees. The fund has committed to invest up to 0.40% of its net assets in Vanguard. At May 31, 2015, the fund had contributed capital of $108,000 to Vanguard (included in Other Assets), representing 0.01% of the fund’s net assets and 0.04% of Vanguard’s capitalization. The fund’s trustees and officers are also directors and employees, respectively, of Vanguard.
C. Various inputs may be used to determine the value of the fund’s investments. These inputs are summarized in three broad levels for financial statement purposes. The inputs or methodologies used to value securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
Level 2—Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
Level 3—Significant unobservable inputs (including the fund’s own assumptions used to determine the fair value of investments).
The following table summarizes the market value of the fund’s investments as of May 31, 2015, based on the inputs used to value them:
| | | |
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
Investments | ($000) | ($000) | ($000) |
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds | — | 1,216,225 | — |
Futures Contracts—Assets1 | 23 | — | — |
Total | 23 | 1,216,225 | — |
1 Represents variation margin on the last day of the reporting period for recently closed futures contracts. | |
30
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund
D. Capital gain distributions are determined on a tax basis and may differ from realized capital gains for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statements to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when gains or losses are recognized in different periods for financial statement and tax purposes. These differences will reverse at some time in the future. The fund’s tax-basis capital gains and losses are determined only at the end of each fiscal year.
At May 31, 2015, the cost of investment securities for tax purposes was $1,162,976,000. Net unrealized appreciation of investment securities for tax purposes was $53,249,000, consisting of unrealized gains of $55,189,000 on securities that had risen in value since their purchase and $1,940,000 in unrealized losses on securities that had fallen in value since their purchase.
E. During the six months ended May 31, 2015, the fund purchased $131,181,000 of investment securities and sold $45,869,000 of investment securities, other than temporary cash investments.
| | |
F. Capital shares issued and redeemed were: | | |
| Six Months Ended | Year Ended |
| May 31, 2015 | November 30, 2014 |
| Shares | Shares |
| (000) | (000) |
Issued | 12,491 | 19,337 |
Issued in Lieu of Cash Distributions | 1,745 | 2,308 |
Redeemed | (6,365) | (13,428) |
Net Increase (Decrease) in Shares Outstanding | 7,871 | 8,217 |
G. Management has determined that no material events or transactions occurred subsequent to May 31, 2015, that would require recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.
31
About Your Fund’s Expenses
As a shareholder of the fund, you incur ongoing costs, which include costs for portfolio management, administrative services, and shareholder reports (like this one), among others. Operating expenses, which are deducted from a fund’s gross income, directly reduce the investment return of the fund.
A fund’s expenses are expressed as a percentage of its average net assets. This figure is known as the expense ratio. The following examples are intended to help you understand the ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in your fund and to compare these costs with those of other mutual funds. The examples are based on an investment of $1,000 made at the beginning of the period shown and held for the entire period.
The accompanying table illustrates your fund’s costs in two ways:
• Based on actual fund return. This section helps you to estimate the actual expenses that you paid over the period. The ”Ending Account Value“ shown is derived from the fund‘s actual return, and the third column shows the dollar amount that would have been paid by an investor who started with $1,000 in the fund. You may use the information here, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period.
To do so, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number given for your fund under the heading ”Expenses Paid During Period.“
• Based on hypothetical 5% yearly return. This section is intended to help you compare your fund‘s costs with those of other mutual funds. It assumes that the fund had a yearly return of 5% before expenses, but that the expense ratio is unchanged. In this case—because the return used is not the fund’s actual return—the results do not apply to your investment. The example is useful in making comparisons because the Securities and Exchange Commission requires all mutual funds to calculate expenses based on a 5% return. You can assess your fund’s costs by comparing this hypothetical example with the hypothetical examples that appear in shareholder reports of other funds.
Note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight and help you compare ongoing costs only and do not reflect transaction costs incurred by the fund for buying and selling securities. Further, the expenses do not include any purchase, redemption, or account service fees described in the fund prospectus. If such fees were applied to your account, your costs would be higher. Your fund does not carry a “sales load.”
The calculations assume no shares were bought or sold during the period. Your actual costs may have been higher or lower, depending on the amount of your investment and the timing of any purchases or redemptions.
You can find more information about the fund’s expenses, including annual expense ratios, in the Financial Statements section of this report. For additional information on operating expenses and other shareholder costs, please refer to your fund’s current prospectus.
32
| | | |
Six Months Ended May 31, 2015 | | | |
| Beginning | Ending | Expenses |
| Account Value | Account Value | Paid During |
Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund | 11/30/2014 | 5/31/2015 | Period |
Based on Actual Fund Return | $1,000.00 | $1,009.42 | $0.75 |
Based on Hypothetical 5% Yearly Return | 1,000.00 | 1,024.18 | 0.76 |
The calculations are based on expenses incurred in the most recent six-month period. The fund’s annualized six-month expense ratio for that period is 0.15%. The dollar amounts shown as “Expenses Paid” are equal to the annualized expense ratio multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by the number of days in the most recent 12-month period.
33
Trustees Approve Advisory Arrangement
The board of trustees of Vanguard Massachusetts Tax-Exempt Fund has renewed the fund’s investment advisory arrangement with The Vanguard Group, Inc. (Vanguard). Vanguard—through its Fixed Income Group—serves as the investment advisor for the fund. The board determined that continuing the fund’s internalized management structure was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders.
The board based its decision upon an evaluation of the advisor’s investment staff, portfolio management process, and performance. The trustees considered the factors discussed below, among others. However, no single factor determined whether the board approved the arrangement. Rather, it was the totality of the circumstances that drove the board’s decision.
Nature, extent, and quality of services
The board reviewed the quality of the fund’s investment management services over both the short and long term, and took into account the organizational depth and stability of the advisor. The board considered that Vanguard has been managing investments for more than three decades. The Fixed Income Group adheres to a sound, disciplined investment management process; the team has considerable experience, stability, and depth.
The board concluded that Vanguard’s experience, stability, depth, and performance, among other factors, warranted continuation of the advisory arrangement.
Investment performance
The board considered the short- and long-term performance of the fund, including any periods of outperformance or underperformance relative to a benchmark index and peer group. The board concluded that the performance was such that the advisory arrangement should continue. Information about the fund’s most recent performance can be found in the Performance Summary section of this report.
Cost
The board concluded that the fund’s expense ratio was well below the average expense ratio charged by funds in its peer group and that the fund’s advisory fee rate was also well below its peer-group average. Information about the fund’s expenses appears in the About Your Fund’s Expenses section of this report as well as in the Financial Statements section.
The board does not conduct a profitability analysis of Vanguard, because of Vanguard’s unique “at-cost” structure. Unlike most other mutual fund management companies, Vanguard is owned by the funds it oversees, and produces “profits” only in the form of reduced expenses for fund shareholders.
The benefit of economies of scale
The board concluded that the fund’s at-cost arrangement with Vanguard ensures that the fund will realize economies of scale as it grows, with the cost to shareholders declining as fund assets increase.
The board will consider whether to renew the advisory arrangement again after a one-year period.
34
Glossary
30-Day SEC Yield. A fund’s 30-day SEC yield is derived using a formula specified by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Under the formula, data related to the fund’s security holdings in the previous 30 days are used to calculate the fund’s hypothetical net income for that period, which is then annualized and divided by the fund’s estimated average net assets over the calculation period. For the purposes of this calculation, a security’s income is based on its current market yield to maturity (for bonds), its actual income (for asset-backed securities), or its projected dividend yield (for stocks). Because the SEC yield represents hypothetical annualized income, it will differ—at times significantly—from the fund’s actual experience. As a result, the fund’s income distributions may be higher or lower than implied by the SEC yield.
Average Coupon. The average interest rate paid on the fixed income securities held by a fund. It is expressed as a percentage of face value.
Average Duration. An estimate of how much the value of the bonds held by a fund will fluctuate in response to a change in interest rates. To see how the value could change, multiply the average duration by the change in rates. If interest rates rise by 1 percentage point, the value of the bonds in a fund with an average duration of five years would decline by about 5%. If rates decrease by a percentage point, the value would rise by 5%.
Average Stated Maturity. The average length of time until fixed income securities held by a fund reach maturity and are repaid using the maturity date of the security. The figure reflects the proportion of fund assets represented by each security; it also reflects any futures contracts held. In general, the longer the average stated maturity, the more a fund’s share price will fluctuate in response to changes in market interest rates.
Beta. A measure of the magnitude of a fund’s past share-price fluctuations in relation to the ups and downs of a given market index. The index is assigned a beta of 1.00. Compared with a given index, a fund with a beta of 1.20 typically would have seen its share price rise or fall by 12% when the index rose or fell by 10%. For this report, beta is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index. Note that a fund’s beta should be reviewed in conjunction with its R-squared (see definition). The lower the R-squared, the less correlation there is between the fund and the index, and the less reliable beta is as an indicator of volatility.
Credit Quality. Credit-quality ratings are measured on a scale that generally ranges from AAA (highest) to D (lowest). Credit-quality ratings are obtained from Moody’s and S&P, and the higher rating for each issue is used. ”Not Rated” is used to classify securities for which a rating is not available. Not rated securities include a fund’s investment in Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund or Vanguard Municipal Cash Management Fund, each of which invests in high-quality money market instruments and may serve as a cash management vehicle for the Vanguard funds, trusts, and accounts.
Expense Ratio. A fund’s total annual operating expenses expressed as a percentage of the fund’s average net assets. The expense ratio includes management and administrative expenses, but does not include the transaction costs of buying and selling portfolio securities.
Inception Date. The date on which the assets of a fund (or one of its share classes) are first invested in accordance with the fund’s investment objective. For funds with a subscription period, the inception date is the day after that period ends. Investment performance is measured from the inception date.
35
R-Squared. A measure of how much of a fund’s past returns can be explained by the returns from the market in general, as measured by a given index. If a fund’s total returns were precisely synchronized with an index’s returns, its R-squared would be 1.00. If the fund’s returns bore no relationship to the index’s returns, its R-squared would be 0. For this report, R-squared is based on returns over the past 36 months for both the fund and the index.
Short-Term Reserves. The percentage of a fund invested in highly liquid, short-term securities that can be readily converted to cash.
Yield to Maturity. The rate of return an investor would receive if the fixed income securities held by a fund were held to their maturity dates.
36
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank.
This page intentionally left blank.
The People Who Govern Your Fund
The trustees of your mutual fund are there to see that the fund is operated and managed in your best interests since, as a shareholder, you are a part owner of the fund. Your fund’s trustees also serve on the board of directors of The Vanguard Group, Inc., which is owned by the Vanguard funds and provides services to them on an at-cost basis.
A majority of Vanguard’s board members are independent, meaning that they have no affiliation with Vanguard or the funds they oversee, apart from the sizable personal investments they have made as private individuals. The independent board members have distinguished backgrounds in business, academia, and public service. Each of the trustees and executive officers oversees 179 Vanguard funds.
The following table provides information for each trustee and executive officer of the fund. More information about the trustees is in the Statement of Additional Information, which can be obtained, without charge, by contacting Vanguard at 800-662-7447, or online at vanguard.com.
InterestedTrustee1
F. William McNabb III
Born 1957. Trustee Since July 2009. Chairman of the Board. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: Chairman of the Board of The Vanguard Group, Inc., and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group, since January 2010; Director of The Vanguard Group since 2008; Chief Executive Officer and President of The Vanguard Group, and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group, since 2008; Director of Vanguard Marketing Corporation; Managing Director of The Vanguard Group (1995–2008).
IndependentTrustees
Emerson U. Fullwood
Born 1948. Trustee Since January 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: Executive Chief Staff and Marketing Officer for North America and Corporate Vice President (retired 2008) of Xerox Corporation (document management products and services); Executive in Residence and 2009–2010 Distinguished Minett Professor at the Rochester Institute of Technology; Director of SPX Corporation (multi-industry manufacturing), the United Way of Rochester, Amerigroup Corporation (managed health care), the University of Rochester Medical Center, Monroe Community College Foundation, and North Carolina A&T University.
Rajiv L. Gupta
Born 1945. Trustee Since December 2001.2 Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (retired 2009) and President (2006–2008) of Rohm and Haas Co. (chemicals); Director of Tyco International PLC (diversified manufacturing and services), Hewlett-Packard Co. (electronic computer manufacturing), and Delphi Automotive PLC (automotive components); Senior Advisor at New Mountain Capital.
Amy Gutmann
Born 1949. Trustee Since June 2006. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: President of the University of Pennsylvania; Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, School of Arts and Sciences, and Professor of Communication, Annenberg School for Communication, with secondary faculty appointments in the Department of Philosophy, School of Arts and Sciences, and at the Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania; Trustee of the National Constitution Center; Chair of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues.
JoAnn Heffernan Heisen
Born 1950. Trustee Since July 1998. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: Corporate Vice President and Chief Global Diversity Officer (retired 2008) and Member of the Executive Committee (1997–2008) of Johnson & Johnson (pharmaceuticals/medical devices/ consumer products); Director of Skytop Lodge Corporation (hotels), the University Medical Center at Princeton, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Center for Talent Innovation; Member of the Advisory Board of the Institute for Women’s Leadership at Rutgers University.
F. Joseph Loughrey
Born 1949. Trustee Since October 2009. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: President and Chief Operating Officer (retired 2009) of Cummins Inc. (industrial machinery); Chairman of the Board of Hillenbrand, Inc. (specialized consumer services), and of Oxfam America; Director of SKF AB (industrial machinery), Hyster-Yale Materials Handling, Inc. (forklift trucks), the Lumina Foundation for Education, and the V Foundation for Cancer Research; Member of the Advisory Council for the College of Arts and Letters and of the Advisory Board to the Kellogg Institute for International Studies, both at the University of Notre Dame.
Mark Loughridge
Born 1953. Trustee Since March 2012. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (retired 2013) at IBM (information technology services); Fiduciary Member of IBM’s Retirement Plan Committee (2004–2013); Director of the Dow Chemical Company; Member of the Council on Chicago Booth.
Scott C. Malpass
Born 1962. Trustee Since March 2012. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: Chief Investment Officer and Vice President at the University of Notre Dame; Assistant Professor of Finance at the Mendoza College of Business at Notre Dame; Member of the Notre Dame 403(b) Investment Committee; Board Member of TIFF Advisory Services, Inc., and Catholic Investment Services, Inc. (investment advisors); Member of the Investment Advisory Committee of Major League Baseball.
André F. Perold
Born 1952. Trustee Since December 2004. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: George Gund Professor of Finance and Banking, Emeritus at the Harvard Business School (retired 2011); Chief Investment Officer and Managing Partner of HighVista Strategies LLC (private investment firm); Director of Rand Merchant Bank; Overseer of the Museum of Fine Arts Boston.
Peter F. Volanakis
Born 1955. Trustee Since July 2009. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: President and Chief Operating Officer (retired 2010) of Corning Incorporated (communications equipment); Trustee of Colby-Sawyer College; Member of the Advisory Board of the Norris Cotton Cancer Center and of the Advisory Board of the Parthenon Group (strategy consulting).
Executive Officers
Glenn Booraem
Born 1967. Treasurer Since May 2015. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: Principal of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Treasurer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group; Controller of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (2010–2015); Assistant Controller of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (2001–2010).
Thomas J. Higgins
Born 1957. Chief Financial Officer Since September 2008. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: Principal of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Chief Financial Officer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group; Treasurer of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group (1998–2008).
Peter Mahoney
Born 1974. Controller Since May 2015. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: Head of Global Fund Accounting at The Vanguard Group, Inc.; Controller of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group; Head of International Fund Services at The Vanguard Group (2008–2014).
Heidi Stam
Born 1956. Secretary Since July 2005. Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years and Other Experience: Managing Director of The Vanguard Group, Inc.; General Counsel of The Vanguard Group; Secretary of The Vanguard Group and of each of the investment companies served by The Vanguard Group; Director and Senior Vice President of Vanguard Marketing Corporation.
Vanguard Senior Management Team
| |
Mortimer J. Buckley Kathleen C. Gubanich Paul A. Heller Martha G. King John T. Marcante Chris D. McIsaac | Michael S. Miller James M. Norris Thomas M. Rampulla Glenn W. Reed Karin A. Risi |
Chairman Emeritus and Senior Advisor
John J. Brennan
Chairman, 1996–2009
Chief Executive Officer and President, 1996–2008
Founder
John C. Bogle
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, 1974–1996
1 Mr. McNabb is considered an “interested person,” as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, because he is an officer of the Vanguard funds.
2 December 2002 for Vanguard Equity Income Fund, the Vanguard Municipal Bond Funds, and the Vanguard State Tax-Exempt Funds.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSRS/0000932471-15-006639/massachusettstax-exemptx44x1.jpg) |
| P.O. Box 2600 |
| Valley Forge, PA 19482-2600 |
Connect with Vanguard® > vanguard.com
| |
Fund Information > 800-662-7447 | CFA® is a registered trademark owned by CFA Institute. |
Direct Investor Account Services > 800-662-2739 | |
Institutional Investor Services > 800-523-1036 | |
Text Telephone for People | |
Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing> 800-749-7273 | |
|
This material may be used in conjunction | |
with the offering of shares of any Vanguard | |
fund only if preceded or accompanied by | |
the fund’s current prospectus. | |
|
All comparative mutual fund data are from Lipper, a | |
Thomson Reuters Company, or Morningstar, Inc., unless | |
otherwise noted. | |
|
You can obtain a free copy of Vanguard’s proxy voting | |
guidelines by visiting vanguard.com/proxyreporting or by | |
calling Vanguard at 800-662-2739. The guidelines are | |
also available from the SEC’s website, sec.gov. In | |
addition, you may obtain a free report on how your fund | |
voted the proxies for securities it owned during the 12 | |
months ended June 30. To get the report, visit either | |
vanguard.com/proxyreporting or sec.gov. | |
|
You can review and copy information about your fund at | |
the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. To | |
find out more about this public service, call the SEC at | |
202-551-8090. Information about your fund is also | |
available on the SEC’s website, and you can receive | |
copies of this information, for a fee, by sending a | |
request in either of two ways: via email addressed to | |
publicinfo@sec.gov or via regular mail addressed to the | |
Public Reference Section, Securities and Exchange | |
Commission, Washington, DC 20549-1520. | |
|
| © 2015 The Vanguard Group, Inc. |
| All rights reserved. |
| Vanguard Marketing Corporation, Distributor. |
|
| Q1682 072015 |
Item 2: Code of Ethics.
Not Applicable.
Item 3: Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not Applicable.
Item 4: Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) Audit Fees.
Not Applicable.
Item 5: Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not Applicable.
Item 6: Investments.
Not Applicable.
Item 7: Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not Applicable.
Item 8: Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not Applicable.
Item 9: Purchase of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not Applicable.
Item 10: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not Applicable.
Item 11: Controls and Procedures.
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Principal Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrant’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on their evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no significant changes in Registrant’s Internal Control Over Financial Reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect this control subsequent to the date of the evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Item 12: Exhibits.
(a) Certifications.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| |
| VANGUARD MASSACHUSETTS TAX-EXEMPT FUNDS |
|
By: | /s/ F. WILLIAM MCNABB III* |
| F. WILLIAM MCNABB III |
| CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
|
Date: July 16, 2015 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| |
| VANGUARD MASSACHUSETTS TAX-EXEMPT FUNDS |
|
By: | /s/ F. WILLIAM MCNABB III* |
| F. WILLIAM MCNABB III |
| CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER |
|
Date: July 16, 2015 |
| |
| VANGUARD MASSACHUSETTS TAX-EXEMPT FUNDS |
|
By: | /s/ THOMAS J. HIGGINS* |
| THOMAS J. HIGGINS |
| CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
|
Date: July 16, 2015 |
* By: /s/ Heidi Stam
Heidi Stam, pursuant to a Power of Attorney filed on April 22, 2014 see file Number 2-17620, Incorporated by Reference.