Item 1. Report to Stockholders.
Item 6. Investments | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Castle Tandem Fund |
| | | | Schedule of Investments |
| | June 30, 2024 |
| | | | | | |
Shares / Principal Amount | | Fair Value | | % of Net Assets |
| | | | | | |
COMMON STOCKS | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Arrangement of Transportation of Freight & Cargo | | | | |
3,900 | | Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. | $ 486,681 | | 1.56% |
| | | | | | |
Beverages | | | | | | |
12,300 | | Brown-Forman Corporation - Class B | | 531,237 | | 1.71% |
| | | | | | |
Cable & Other Pay Television Services | | | | |
22,900 | | Comcast Corporation - Class A | | 896,764 | | 2.88% |
| | | | | | |
Canned, Fruits, Vegetables, Preserves, Jams & Jellies | | | |
6,700 | | The J.M. Smucker Company | | 730,568 | | 2.35% |
| | | | | | |
Electric Services | | | | |
13,500 | | NextEra Energy Inc. | | 955,935 | | 3.07% |
| | | | | | |
Electronic Connectors | | | | |
15,000 | | Amphenol Corporation - Class A | | 1,010,550 | | 3.25% |
| | | | | | |
Industrial Instruments For Measurement, Display, and Control | | | |
700 | | Roper Technologies, Inc. | | 394,562 | | 1.27% |
| | | | | | |
Insurance Agents, Brokers & Services | | | | |
8,400 | | Brown & Brown, Inc. | | 751,044 | | 2.41% |
| | | | | | |
Orthopedic, Prosthetic & Surgical Appliances & Supplies | | | |
3,700 | | Steris PLC (Ireland) | | 812,298 | | 2.61% |
| | | | | | |
Pharmaceutical Preparations | | | | |
10,700 | | Abbott Laboratories | | 1,111,837 | | |
5,400 | | Johnson & Johnson | | 789,264 | | |
| | | | 1,901,101 | | 6.11% |
| | | | | | |
Refuse Systems | | | | |
3,000 | | Republic Services, Inc. | | 583,020 | | |
3,800 | | Waste Connections, Inc. (Canada) | | 666,368 | | |
| | | | 1,249,388 | | 4.01% |
| | | | | | |
Retail - Variety Stores | | | | |
700 | | Costco Wholesale Corporation | | 594,993 | | 1.91% |
| | | | | | |
Rubber & Plastics Footwear | | | | |
5,900 | | NIKE, Inc. - Class B | | 444,683 | | 1.43% |
| | | | | | |
Security & Commodity Brokers, Dealers, Exchanges & Services | | | |
8,300 | | Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | | 1,411,498 | | |
8,700 | | Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. | | 1,190,943 | | |
| | | | 2,602,441 | | 8.36% |
| | | | | | |
Security Brokers, Dealers & Flotation Companies | | | | |
900 | | BlackRock, Inc. | | 708,588 | | |
2,100 | | MarketAxess Holdings Inc. | | 421,113 | | |
4,700 | | SEI Investments Company | | 304,043 | | |
| | | | 1,433,744 | | 4.60% |
| | | | | | |
Services - Business Services, NEC | | | | |
2,600 | | Accenture PLC - Class A (Ireland) | | 788,866 | | |
1,900 | | Mastercard Incorporated - Class A | | 838,204 | | |
4,300 | | Visa Inc. - Class A | | 1,128,621 | | |
| | | | 2,755,691 | | 8.85% |
| | | | | | |
Services - Computer Integrated Systems Design | | | | |
5,100 | | Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. | | 846,702 | | 2.72% |
| | | | | | |
Services - Computer Processing & Data Preparation | | | | |
1,800 | | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | | 429,642 | | |
1,800 | | Verisk Analytics, Inc. | | 485,190 | | |
| | | | 914,832 | | 2.94% |
| | | | | | |
Services - Computer Programming, Data Processing, Etc. | | | |
2,500 | | FactSet Research Systems, Inc. | | 1,020,675 | | 3.28% |
| | | | | | |
Services - Prepackaged Software | | | | |
2,100 | | Microsoft Corporation | | 938,595 | | 3.01% |
| | | | | | |
Soap, Detergent, Cleaning Preparations, Perfumes, Cosmetics | | | |
5,600 | | Church & Dwight Co. | | 580,608 | | 1.86% |
| | | | | | |
Surgical & Medical Instruments & Apparatus | | | | |
4,100 | | Becton, Dickinson and Company | | 958,211 | | |
5,400 | | ResMed, Inc. | | 1,033,668 | | |
3,000 | | Stryker Corporation | | 1,020,750 | | |
| | | | 3,012,629 | | 9.68% |
| | | | | | |
Water Supply | | | | | |
21,700 | | Essential Utilities, Inc. | | 810,061 | | 2.60% |
| | | | | | |
Total for Common Stocks (Cost - $19,220,212) | | 25,675,782 | | 82.47% |
| | | | | | |
REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS | | | | |
12,000 | | Terreno Realty Corporation | | 710,160 | | 2.28% |
| | (Cost - $658,412) | | | | |
| | | | | | |
GOVERNMENT SECURITIES | | | | |
$ 1,000,000 | | United States Treasury 5.32% Due 07/02/2024 * ** | 999,854 | | |
1,000,000 | | United States Treasury 5.29% Due 07/09/2024 * ** | 998,842 | | |
1,000,000 | | United States Treasury 5.34% Due 07/16/2024 * ** | 997,811 | | |
1,000,000 | | United States Treasury 5.33% Due 07/23/2024 * ** | 996,795 | | |
| | (Cost - $3,992,147) | | 3,993,302 | | 12.83% |
| | | | | | |
MONEY MARKET FUNDS | | | | |
741,875 | | Goldman Sachs FS Government Fund Institutional - 5.22% *** | 741,875 | | 2.38% |
| | (Cost - $ 741,875 ) | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Total Investments | | 31,121,119 | | 99.96% |
| | (Cost - $24,612,646) | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities | | 11,284 | | 0.04% |
| | | | | | |
| | Net Assets | | $ 31,132,403 | | 100.00% |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
* Zero coupon bond. Coupon rate disclosed represents yield at June 30, 2024. | | | |
** Level 2 Security. | | | | |
*** The Yield shown represents the 7-day yield at June 30, 2024. | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | | |
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | |
CASTLE TANDEM FUND | |
June 30, 2024 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
1.) ORGANIZATION | | | | | | | | | |
Castle Tandem Fund (the “Fund”) was organized as a diversified series of the PFS Funds (the “Trust”) on March 5, 2019, and commenced operations on March 15, 2019. The Trust was established under the laws of Massachusetts by an Agreement and Declaration of Trust dated January 13, 2000, as amended on January 20, 2011 (the “Trust Agreement”). The Trust is registered as an open-end investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). The Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of multiple separate and distinct portfolio series the assets and liabilities of which are separate and distinct from the assets and liabilities of the other series portfolios of the Trust. As of June 30, 2024, there were twelve series authorized by the Trust. The investment adviser to the Fund is Castle Investment Management, LLC (the “Adviser”) and the sub-adviser to the Fund is Tandem Investment Advisors, Inc. (the “Sub-Adviser”). Significant accounting policies of the Fund are presented below. |
| | | | | | | | | |
2.) SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | | | | | | | |
The Fund is an investment company and accordingly follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 Financial Services - Investment Companies. The financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Fund follows the significant accounting policies described in this section. |
| | | | | | | | | |
SECURITY VALUATION: | | | | | | | | | |
All investments in securities are valued as described in Note 3. The Trust’s Board of Trustees (“Board”) has designated the Adviser as “Valuation Designee” pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act. |
| | | | | | | | | |
SHARE VALUATION: | | | | | | | | | |
The net asset value (the "NAV") is generally calculated as of the close of trading on the New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”) (normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time) every day the Exchange is open. The NAV is calculated by taking the total value of the Fund’s assets, subtracting its liabilities, and then dividing by the total number of shares outstanding, rounded to the nearest cent. The offering price and redemption price per share is equal to the net asset value per share. |
| | | | | | | | | |
FEDERAL INCOME TAXES: | | | | | | | | | |
The Fund’s policy is to continue to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code that are applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute all of its taxable income to shareholders. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. It is the Fund’s policy to distribute annually, prior to the end of the calendar year, dividends sufficient to satisfy excise tax requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. This Internal Revenue Code requirement may cause an excess of distributions over the book year-end accumulated income. In addition, it is the Fund’s policy to distribute annually, after the end of the fiscal year, any remaining net investment income and net realized capital gains. |
| | | | | | | | | |
The Fund recognizes the tax benefits of certain tax positions only where the position is “more likely than not” to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. Management has analyzed the Fund’s tax positions, and has concluded that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits should be recorded related to uncertain tax positions taken on returns filed for open tax years. The Fund identifies its major tax jurisdictions as U.S. Federal and State tax authorities; however, the Fund is not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will change materially in the next twelve months. The Fund recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the Statement of Operations. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the Fund did not incur any interest or penalties. |
| | | | | | | | | |
DISTRIBUTIONS TO SHAREHOLDERS: | | | | | | | |
Distributions to shareholders, which are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. |
| | | | | | | | | |
The treatment for financial reporting purposes of distributions made to shareholders during the period from net investment income or net realized capital gains may differ from their ultimate treatment for federal income tax purposes. These differences are caused primarily by differences in the timing of the recognition of certain components of income, expense, or realized capital gain for federal income tax purposes. Where such differences are permanent in nature, they are reclassified in the components of the net assets based on their ultimate characterization for federal income tax purposes. Any such reclassifications will have no effect on net assets, results of operations, or net asset value per share of the Fund. |
| | | | | | | | | |
USE OF ESTIMATES: | | | | | | | | | |
The financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
| | | | | | | | | |
EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses incurred by the Trust that do not relate to a specific fund of the Trust are allocated to the individual funds based on each fund’s relative net assets or another appropriate basis. |
| | | | | | | | | |
OTHER: | | | | | | | | | |
The Fund records security transactions based on a trade date for financial reporting purposes. Dividend income is recognized on the ex-dividend date, and interest income, if any, is recognized on an accrual basis. The Fund uses the specific identification method in computing gain or loss on the sale of investment securities. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends have been provided for in accordance with the Fund’s understanding of the applicable country’s tax rules and rates. Discounts and premiums on securities purchased are amortized over the lives of the respective securities. The Fund may invest in real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) that pay distributions to their shareholders based on available funds from operations. It is common for these distributions to exceed the REITs’ taxable earnings and profits resulting in the excess portion of such distribution to be designated as return of capital. Distributions received from REITs are generally recorded as dividend income and, if necessary, are reclassified annually in accordance with tax information provided by the underlying REITs. |
| | | | | | | | | |
3.) SECURITIES VALUATIONS | | | | | | | | | |
The Fund utilizes various methods to measure the fair value of its investments on a recurring basis. GAAP establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation methods. The three levels of inputs are: |
| | | | | | | | | |
Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Fund has the ability to access. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Level 2 - Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market, prices for similar instruments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, yield curves, default rates and similar data. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, to the extent relevant observable inputs are not available, representing the Fund’s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset or liability, and would be based on the best information available. |
| | | | | | | | | |
The availability of observable inputs can vary from security to security and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of security, whether the security is new and not yet established in the marketplace, the liquidity of markets, and other characteristics particular to the security. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in level 3. |
| | | | | | | | | |
The inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement falls in its entirety, is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. |
| | | | | | | | | |
VALUATION OF FUND ASSETS | | | | | | | | | |
A description of the valuation techniques applied to the Fund’s major categories of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis follows. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Equity securities (common stocks, including real estate investment companies). Equity securities generally are valued by using market quotations, but may be valued on the basis of prices furnished by a pricing service when the Valuation Designee believes such prices accurately reflect the fair value of such securities. Securities that are traded on any stock exchange or on the NASDAQ over-the-counter market are generally valued by the pricing service at the last quoted sale price. Lacking a last sale price, an equity security is generally valued by the pricing service at its last bid price. Generally, if the security is traded in an active market and is valued at the last sale price, the security is categorized as a level 1 security, and if an equity security is valued by the pricing service at its last bid, it is generally categorized as a level 2 security. When market quotations are not readily available, when the Valuation Designee determines that the market quotation or the price provided by the pricing service does not accurately reflect the current fair value, or when restricted securities are being valued, such securities are valued as determined in good faith by the Valuation Designee, subject to review of the Board, and are categorized in level 2 or level 3, when appropriate. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Fixed Income Securities. Fixed income securities are valued using prices provided by a pricing service approved by the Board. If the Fund's Valuation Designee determines that a price provided by the pricing service does not accurately reflect the fair market value of the securities, when prices are not readily available from a pricing service, or when restricted or illiquid securities are being valued, securities are valued at fair value as determined under the fair value pricing procedures below. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Money market funds. Money market funds are valued at net asset value provided by the funds and are classified in level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. |
| | | | | | | | | |
In accordance with the Trust’s good faith pricing guidelines, the Valuation Designee is required to consider all appropriate factors relevant to the value of securities for which it has determined other pricing sources are not available or reliable as described above. There is no standard procedure for determining fair value, since fair value depends upon the circumstances of each individual case. As a general principle, the current fair value of an issue of securities being valued by the Valuation Designee would appear to be the amount which the owner might reasonably expect to receive for them upon their current sale. Methods which are in accordance with this principle may, for example, be based on (i) a multiple of earnings; (ii) a discount from market of a similar freely traded security (including a derivative security or a basket of securities traded on other markets, exchanges or among dealers); or (iii) yield to maturity with respect to debt issues, or a combination of these and other methods. The Board maintains responsibilities for the fair value determinations under Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act and oversees the Valuation Designee. |
| | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes the inputs used to value the Fund’s assets measured at fair value as of June 30, 2024: |
| | | | | | | | | |
Valuation Inputs of Assets | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total | |
Common Stocks | | $ 25,675,782 | | $ - | | $ - | | $ 25,675,782 | |
Real Estate Investment Trusts | | 710,160 | | - | | - | | 710,160 | |
Government Securities | | - | | 3,993,302 | | - | | 3,993,302 | |
Money Market Funds | | 741,875 | | - | | - | | 741,875 | |
Total | | $ 27,127,817 | | $ 3,993,302 | | $ - | | $ 31,121,119 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Refer to the Fund’s Schedule of Investments for a listing of securities by industry. The Fund did not hold any Level 3 assets during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. |
| | | | | | | | | |
The Fund did not invest in derivative instruments during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. | |
| | | | | | | | | |
4.) INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT AND SERVICES AGREEMENT | | | |
The Fund entered into an Investment Management Agreement with Castle Investment Management, LLC as the investment adviser of the Fund. Under the terms of the Investment Management Agreement, the Adviser manages the investment portfolio of the Fund, subject to policies adopted by the Trust’s Trustees. The Adviser, furnishes office space and all necessary office facilities, equipment and executive personnel necessary for managing the assets of the Fund. For its services, the Adviser receives an annual investment management fee of 1.00% of the average daily net assets of the Fund. The Sub-Adviser of the Fund has responsibility for providing investment ideas and recommendations for the assets of the Fund, subject to the supervision of the Adviser. As full compensation for all services rendered, including investment ideas and recommendations for the assets of the Fund, the Adviser pays the Sub-Adviser a sub-adviser fee. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the Adviser received management fees totaling $338,417. At June 30, 2024, the Fund owed $25,739 to the Adviser. |
| | | | | | | | | |
The Fund also has a Services Agreement with the Adviser (the “Services Agreement”), under which the Fund pays the Adviser. Under the Services Agreement, the Adviser shall supervise the Fund’s business affairs and is obligated to pay the operating expenses of the Fund excluding management fees, brokerage fees and commissions, taxes, borrowing costs (such as (a) interest and (b) dividend expenses on securities sold short), underlying fund fees and expenses, and extraordinary or non-recurring expenses. In addition, to the extent not otherwise provided by other parties under agreements with the Trust, the Adviser shall supply: (i) non-investment related statistical and research data; (ii) the services of a Chief Compliance Officer for the Trust with resect to the Fund; and (iii) executive and administrative services. The Adviser shall also assist with and/or supervise the preparation by the Trust’s administrator, transfer agent, and/or auditors of: (i) tax returns; (ii) reports to shareholders of the Fund; (iii) reports to, and filings with, the SEC, state securities commissions and Blue Sky authorities including preliminary and definitive proxy materials and post-effective amendments to the Trust’s registration statement; and (iv) necessary materials for meetings of the Trust’s Board of Trustees. The Adviser shall provide personnel to serve as officers of the Trust if so elected by the Trustees. Executive and administrative services include, but are not limited to, the coordination of all third parties furnishing services to the Fund, review of the books and records of the Fund maintained by such third parties, and the review and submission to the officers of the Fund for their approval, of invoices or other requests for payment of Fund expenses; and such other action with respect to the Fund as may be necessary in the opinion of the Adviser to perform its duties. For its services, the Adviser receives a service fee equal to 0.58% of the average daily net assets of the Fund. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the Adviser earned service fees of $196,282. At June 30, 2024, the Fund owed the Adviser service fees of $4,633. Beginning March 15, 2019, the Adviser has contractually agreed to waive Services Agreement fees by 0.40% of its average daily net assets through October 31, 2024. The Services Agreement fee waiver will automatically terminate on October 31, 2024 unless it is renewed by the Adviser. The Adviser may not terminate the fee waiver before October 31, 2024. There are no recoupment provisions for the waivers described above. A total of $135,367 in service fees was waived for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. |
| | | | | | | | | |
5.) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS | | | | | | | |
Certain officers and a Trustee of the Trust are also officers of Premier Fund Solutions, Inc. (the “Administrator”). These individuals receive benefits from the Administrator resulting from administration fees paid to the Administrator of the Fund by the Adviser. |
| | | | | | | | | |
The Trustees who are not interested persons of the Fund were each paid $1,500, for a total of $6,000, in Trustees’ fees for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024. These fees were paid by the Adviser. |
| | | | | | | | | |
6.) INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS | | | | | | | | | |
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, purchases and sales of investment securities other than U.S. Government obligations and short-term investments aggregated $3,350,781 and $8,122,369, respectively. Purchases and sales of U.S. Government obligations aggregated $42,062,317 and $42,511,000, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | |
7.) CONTROL OWNERSHIP | | | | | | | | | |
The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a fund creates a presumption of control of the fund, under Section 2(a)(9) of the 1940 Act. As of June 30, 2024, National Financial Services, LLC, and Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. held for the benefit of their customers, in the aggregate, 37.45% and 36.21%, respectively, of Fund shares. The Trust does not know whether the foregoing entity or any of the underlying beneficial holders owned or controlled 25% or more of the voting securities of the Fund. |
| | | | | | | | | |
8.) TAX MATTERS | | | | | | | | | |
For Federal income tax purposes, the cost of securities owned at June 30, 2024 was $24,625,624. |
| | | | | | | | | |
At June 30, 2024, the composition of gross unrealized appreciation (the excess of value over tax cost) and depreciation (the excess of tax cost over value) of investments on a tax basis was as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | |
Appreciation | | Depreciation | Net Appreciation/(Depreciation) |
$7,363,975 | | ($868,480) | | $6,495,495 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The tax character of distributions was as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal Year Ended | | Fiscal Year Ended | | |
| June 30, 2024 | | June 30, 2023 | | |
Ordinary Income | | $ 324,901 | | | | $ 179,700 | | | |
Long-Term Capital Gain | | 392,205 | | | | 493,198 | | | |
| | $ 717,106 | | | | $ 672,898 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
At June 30, 2024, the components of distributable earnings on a tax basis were as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | |
Undistributed Ordinary Income | | | | | $ 168,236 | | |
Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gain | | | | 693,293 | | |
Unrealized Appreciation – Net | | | | | 6,495,495 | | |
| | | | | $ 7,357,024 | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
As of June 30, 2024, the primary differences between book and tax basis unrealized appreciation were attributable to the tax deferral of wash sales. |
| | | | | | | | | |
9.) CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS | | | | | | | |
The Trust indemnifies its officers and the Board for certain liabilities that may arise from the performance of their duties to the Trust. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that contain a variety of representations and warranties and which provide general indemnities. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. However, based on experience, the risk of loss due to these warranties and indemnities appears to be remote. |
| | | | | | | | | |
10.) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS | | | | | | | | | |
Subsequent events after the date of the Statement of Assets and Liabilities have been evaluated through the date the financial statements were issued. Management has concluded that there is no impact requiring adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements. |
Item 11. Statement Regarding Basis for Approval of Investment Advisory Contract. | |
| | | | | | | | | |
On March 7, 2024, the Board of Trustees (the “Board” or the “Trustees”) considered the renewal of the Management Agreement between the Trust and Castle Investment Management, LLC (“Castle”) on behalf of the Castle Tandem Fund and the Investment Sub-Advisory Agreement between Castle and Tandem Investment Advisors, Inc. (“Tandem”) on behalf of the Castle Tandem Fund (the “Agreements”). In approving the Agreements, the Board considered and evaluated the following factors: (i) the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by Castle and Tandem to the Castle Tandem Fund; (ii) the investment performance of the Castle Tandem Fund, Castle, and Tandem; (iii) the cost of the services to be provided and the profits to be realized by Castle and Tandem and their respective affiliates (if any) from the relationship with the Castle Tandem Fund; (iv) the extent to which economies of scale will be realized as the Castle Tandem Fund grows and whether the fee levels reflect these economies of scale to the benefit of its shareholders; and (v) Castle’s and Tandem’s practices regarding possible conflicts of interest. |
| | | | | | | | | |
In assessing these factors and reaching its decisions, the Board took into consideration information furnished throughout the year at regular Board meetings, as well as information specifically prepared or presented in connection with the annual renewal process, including information presented at the Meeting. The Board reflected on the presentation by a representative of Castle earlier in the Meeting. The Board requested and was provided with information and reports relevant to the annual renewal of the Agreements, including: (i) reports regarding the services and support provided to the Castle Tandem Fund and its shareholders by Castle and Tandem; (ii) assessments of the investment performance of the Castle Tandem Fund by personnel of Castle; (iii) commentary on the reasons for the performance; (iv) presentations addressing Castle’s and Tandem’s investment philosophy, investment strategy, personnel, and operations; (v) compliance and audit reports concerning the Castle Tandem Fund, Castle, and Tandem; (vi) disclosure information contained in the registration statement of the Trust and the Forms ADV of Castle and Tandem; and (vii) a memorandum from Counsel that summarized the fiduciary duties and responsibilities of the Board in reviewing and approving the Agreements, including the material factors set forth above and the types of information included in each factor that should be considered by the Board in order to make an informed decision. The Board also requested and received various informational materials including, without limitation: (i) documents containing information about Castle and Tandem, including financial information, a description of personnel and the services provided to the Castle Tandem Fund, information on investment advice, performance, summaries of Castle Tandem Fund expenses, compliance program, current legal matters, and other general information; (ii) comparative expense and performance information for other mutual funds with strategies similar to the Castle Tandem Fund; and (iii) benefits to be realized by Castle and Tandem from their relationship with the Castle Tandem Fund. The Board did not identify any information that was most relevant to its consideration to approve the Agreements, and each Trustee may have afforded different weight to the various factors. |
|
1. Nature, Extent, and Quality of the Services Provided by Castle and Tandem |
| | | | | | | | | |
In considering the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by Castle and Tandem, the Trustees reviewed the responsibilities of Castle and Tandem under the Agreements. The Trustees reviewed the services being provided by Castle and Tandem including, without limitation: the quality of investment advisory services (including research and recommendations with respect to portfolio securities); the process for formulating investment recommendations and assuring compliance with the Castle Tandem Fund’s investment objective, strategies and limitations, and regulatory requirements. The Trustees reflected on their discussions with representatives from Castle throughout the past year and earlier in the Meeting. The Trustees considered the coordination of services for the Castle Tandem Fund among Castle and the service providers (including Tandem) and Castle’s interactions with the Independent Trustees; and the efforts of Castle to promote the Castle Tandem Fund and grow its assets. The Trustees noted Castle’s and Tandem’s continuity of, and commitment to retain, qualified personnel and to maintain and enhance its resources and systems and the continued cooperation with the Independent Trustees and Counsel for the Castle Tandem Fund. The Trustees evaluated Castle’s and Tandem’s personnel, including the education and experience of their personnel. After reviewing the foregoing information and further information in the materials provided by Castle and Tandem, the Board concluded that, considering all the facts and circumstances, the nature, extent, and quality of the services provided by Castle and Tandem were satisfactory and adequate for the Castle Tandem Fund. |
| | | | | | | | | |
2. Investment Performance of the Castle Tandem Fund, Castle, and Tandem |
| | | | | | | | | |
In considering the investment performance of the Castle Tandem Fund, Castle, and Tandem, the Trustees compared the performance of the Castle Tandem Fund with the performance of funds with similar objectives managed by other investment advisers, as well as with aggregated peer group data. The Trustees noted that Castle’s only other client is another mutual fund in the Trust. The Trustees discussed the performance of the Castle Tandem Fund compared to other accounts managed by Tandem. As to the performance of the Castle Tandem Fund, the Board was provided with a report that included information regarding the performance of the Castle Tandem Fund compared to the Fund’s Morningstar category of US Large Blend Funds (the “Category”) and to a group of funds of similar size, style, and objective, derived from the Category with assets ranging from $15 million to $50 million (the “Peer Group”). The Trustees noted that for the 1-, and 3-year periods ended December 31, 2023, the Castle Tandem Fund underperformed its benchmark, the S&P 500, and the average of the Category and the Peer Group. After reviewing and discussing the investment performance of the Castle Tandem Fund further, Castle’s and Tandem’s experience managing the Castle Tandem Fund, Tandem’s historical investment performance, and other relevant factors, the Board concluded, considering all the facts and circumstances, that the investment performance of the Castle Tandem Fund, Castle, and Tandem was satisfactory, but noted that it would continue to monitor the Castle Tandem Fund’s performance. |
| | | | | | | | | |
3. Costs of the Services to be Provided and Profits to be Realized by Castle and Tandem |
| | | | | | | | | |
In considering the costs of the services to be provided and profits to be realized by Castle and Tandem from the relationship with the Castle Tandem Fund, the Trustees considered: (1) Castle’s and Tandem’s financial condition and the level of commitment to the Castle Tandem Fund and Castle by the principals of Castle; (2) the asset level of the Castle Tandem Fund; (3) the overall expenses of the Castle Tandem Fund; and (4) the nature and frequency of advisory and sub-advisory fee payments. The Trustees reviewed the information provided by Castle and Tandem regarding their respective profits associated with managing the Castle Tandem Fund. The Trustees also considered potential benefits for Castle and Tandem in managing the Castle Tandem Fund. The Trustees then compared the fees and expenses of the Castle Tandem Fund (including the management fee) to other comparable mutual funds. The Trustees reviewed the fees under the Agreements compared to the Peer Group and the Category, noting that the management fee and net expense ratio were above the Peer Group and Category averages. The Trustees also considered the fees charged by Tandem relative to the fees it charged to its other managed accounts, noting that the fees charged to the Castle Tandem Fund were less than the average management fee charged to their other managed accounts. The Trustees noted that, although the management fee is high relative to the Peer Group and Category averages, it was within the range of management fees of the Peer Group and the Category. The Trustees also considered the sub-advisory portion of the fee, noting that it appeared reasonable in light of the services being provided by Tandem. They also acknowledged that Castle is responsible for paying the sub-advisory fee to Tandem. The Trustees recognized that Castle has indicated its intention to continue the fee waiver arrangement as it relates to the Services Agreement with the Castle Tandem Fund for another annual period. The Trustees also considered that under the contractual arrangements with Castle, it was required to pay most of the Castle Tandem Fund’s operating expenses out of its assets. Based on the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fees to be paid to Castle (and in turn Castle’s payment to Tandem) and the profits to be realized, if any, by Castle and Tandem, in light of all the facts and circumstances, were fair and reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of the services provided by Castle and Tandem. |
| | | | | | | | | |
4. Economies of Scale |
| | | | | | | | | |
The Trustees next considered the impact of economies of scale on the Castle Tandem Fund’s size and whether advisory fee levels will reflect those economies of scale for the benefit of the Castle Tandem Fund’s investors. The Trustees considered that while the management fee remained the same at all asset levels, the Castle Tandem Fund’s shareholders will experience benefits from the fact that Castle is obligated to pay certain of the Castle Tandem Fund’s operating expenses under a Services Agreement with the Castle Tandem Fund, which has the effect of limiting the overall fees paid by the Castle Tandem Fund. The Trustees also recognized, as noted above, that Castle has indicated its intention to continue the waiver of a portion of its fees under the Services Agreement for an additional annual period. The Trustees also noted that the contractual arrangements with the Trust required that Castle effectively cap the expenses of the Castle Tandem Fund. The Trustees also noted that the fees payable to Tandem were paid from the amounts paid to Castle and not paid directly by Castle Tandem Fund shareholders. In light of its ongoing consideration of the Castle Tandem Fund’s current asset levels, expectations for growth in the Castle Tandem Fund, and fee levels, the Board determined that the Castle Tandem Fund’s fee arrangements, in light of all the facts and circumstances, were fair and reasonable in relation to the nature and quality of the services provided by Castle and Tandem. |
| | | | | | | | | |
5. Possible Conflicts of Interest and Benefits to Castle and Tandem | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
In considering Castle and Tandem’s practices regarding conflicts of interest, the Trustees evaluated the potential for conflicts of interest and considered such matters as the experience and ability of the advisory personnel assigned to the Castle Tandem Fund; the basis of decisions to buy or sell securities for the Castle Tandem Fund; and the substance and administration of Castle’s and Tandem’ respective codes of ethics. The Trustees also considered disclosure in the registration statement of the Trust related to Castle and Tandem’s potential conflicts of interest. The Trustees noted that Castle has no other clients other than another fund in the Trust. The Trustees considered Castle’s role in monitoring Tandem’s compliance with such things as personal trading, brokerage and portfolio transactions, and trade allocations among clients. The Trustees noted that Tandem does not utilize soft dollars. The Trustees discussed the potential benefit of additional public exposure of Castle and Tandem based on marketing that is done for the Castle Tandem Fund. No other potential benefits (other than the management and service fees paid to Castle and sub-advisory fees paid to Tandem) were identified by the Trustees. Based on the foregoing, the Board determined that Castle’s and Tandem’s standards and practices relating to the identification and mitigation of possible conflicts of interest were satisfactory. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Next, the Independent Trustees met in executive session along with Counsel to discuss the continuation of the Agreements. The officers of the Trust and others present were excused during this discussion. |
| | | | | | | | | |
After further review and discussion, it was the Trustees’ determination that the best interests of the Castle Tandem Fund’s shareholders were served by the renewal of the Agreements. |