UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-10067
Eaton Vance Variable Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(Registrant’s Telephone Number)
December 31
Date of Fiscal Year End
December 31, 2010
Date of Reporting Period
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
Annual Report December 31, 2010 EATON VANCE VT FLOATING-RATE INCOME FUND |
IMPORTANT NOTICES
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. Our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures. For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise. If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser. Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
| |
|
• | The U.S. economy continued its slow recovery during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, despite stubbornly ![(PHOTO OF SCOTT H. PAGE)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000950123-11-018573/b84815a1b8414106.jpg) Scott H. Page, CFA Co-Portfolio Manager high unemployment and record budget deficits. The U.S. economy grew at an annualized rate of 3.7% in the first quarter of 2010, but slowed to 1.7% in the second quarter, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. Third quarter GDP improved slightly to an annualized rate of 2.5%, although it was still too low to generate meaningful job growth. Fourth quarter GDP was 3.2%, according to the first estimate by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Unemployment finished the year at 9.8%, ![(PHOTO OF CRAIG P. RUSS)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000950123-11-018573/b84815a1b8414107.jpg) Craig P. Russ Co-Portfolio Manager and it remained difficult to find signs of strength in the housing market as the year came to a close.
• The market was fairly skittish during the first three months of 2010, with credit spreads widening on slower growth, high unemployment and the expanding European sovereign debt crisis. However, the market stabilized in the second and third quarters, as investors reacted favorably to the strengthening economy and a $1 trillion bailout package announced by the ![(PHOTO OF ANDREW N. SVEEN)](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000950123-11-018573/b84815a1b8414108.jpg) Andrew N. Sveen, CFA Co-Portfolio Manager European Central Bank to bolster ailing European banks. In the fourth quarter, however, problematic state and local finances, questions about future tax policy, the loss of economic momentum and new concerns over the euro-zone debt crisis all weighed on markets, prompting Federal Reserve Board (the Fed) Chairman Bernanke in early November to propose $600 billion |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
|
|
| | in U.S. Treasury purchases. Bond investors—emboldened by this second round of quantitative easing, dubbed QE2—continued to move from low-yielding risk-free assets to higher-risk asset classes, including bank loans. In the last two months of 2010, during which the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond yield (short-term rates) rose by almost 1%, bank loans showed less price sensitivity to rising rates than most investment-grade bond sectors and strongly outperformed. Corporate operating earnings growth continued to improve, while ratings downgrades and new defaults diminished to more modest levels. |
Management Discussion
|
• | | The investment objective of Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund (the Fund) is to provide a high level of current income. To do so, the Fund invests primarily in senior floating-rate loans (Senior Loans). The Fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets in income-producing floating-rate loans and other floating-rate debt securities. |
|
• | | During the period, the Fund’s net asset value (NAV) increased from $9.05 on December 31, 2009, to $9.46 on December 31, 2010. The Fund’s total return of 9.12% lagged that of its benchmark, the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index, which returned 10.13% for |
| | | | |
Total Return Performance
| | | | |
12/31/09 – 12/31/10 | | | | |
|
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund1 | | | 9.12 | % |
| | | | |
S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index2 | | | 10.13 | |
| | | | |
See page 3 for more performance information. | | | | |
| |
1 | The Fund has no sales charge. Insurance-related charges are not included in the calculation of returns. Such expenses would reduce the overall return shown. Please refer to the report for your insurance contract for performance data reflecting insurance-related charges. |
|
2 | It is not possible to invest directly in an index. The Index’s total return reflects changes in value of the loans constituting the Index and accrual of interest and does not reflect expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the loans represented in the Index. |
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
The views expressed in this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Fund’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
1
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
| | the fiscal year. The Fund is generally positioned more conservatively than the Index and, therefore, realized a slightly lower return as riskier assets outperformed during the latter half of the fiscal year. |
|
• | | The Fund distributed $0.401 per share in dividends during the fiscal year. The Fed’s policy continued to sustain short-term interest rates at historic lows. This policy influenced the portfolio’s investment income as the Fund invests largely in floating-rate loans, which pay less in a low interest-rate environment. Based on a $9.46 NAV per share as of December 31, 2010, and its last monthly distribution in the period, the Fund had a distribution rate of 4.52% and an SEC yield of 4.67%.1 The distribution rate increased slightly from 4.34% as of December 31, 2009, largely due to increased spreads in the loan market. |
|
• | | As of December 31, 2010, the Fund’s investments included Senior Loans to 259 borrowers spanning 36 industries, with an average loan size of 0.36% of total investments, and no industry constituting more than 10.4% of total investments. Health care, business equipment and services, and leisure goods/activities/ movies were the top three industry weightings. |
| |
1 | The Distribution Rate is based on the Fund’s last regular distribution per share in the period (annualized) divided by the Fund’s NAV at the end of the period. The Fund’s distributions may be comprised of ordinary income, net realized capital gains and return of capital. The Fund’s SEC yield is calculated by dividing the net investment income per share for the 30-day period by the offering price at the end of the period and annualizing the result. |
Portfolio Composition
Top 10 Holdings2
By total investments
| | | | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc. | | | 1.4 | % |
Nielsen Finance, LLC | | | 1.4 | |
Community Health Systems, Inc. | | | 1.3 | |
HCA, Inc. | | | 1.3 | |
Charter Communications Operating, LLC | | | 1.2 | |
Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. | | | 1.2 | |
UPC Broadband Holding B.V. | | | 1.1 | |
Aramark Corp. | | | 1.1 | |
Health Management Associates, Inc. | | | 1.1 | |
Intelsat Corp. | | | 1.1 | |
| |
2 | Top 10 Holdings represented 12.2% of the Fund’s total investments as of 12/31/10. |
Top Five Industries3
By total investments
| | | | |
Health Care | | | 10.4 | % |
Business Equipment and Services | | | 8.6 | |
Leisure Goods/Activities/Movies | | | 5.5 | |
Publishing | | | 4.8 | |
Cable and Satellite Television | | | 4.6 | |
| |
3 | Industries are shown as a percentage of the Fund’s total investments as of 12/31/10. |
Credit Quality Ratings for
Total Loan Investments4
By total loan investments
| | | | |
Baa | | | 2.7 | % |
Ba | | | 51.9 | |
B | | | 39.0 | |
Caa | | | 2.1 | |
Ca | | | 0.5 | |
Defautled | | | 0.2 | |
Non-Rated | | | 3.6 | |
| |
4 | Ratings are based on Moody’s, S&P or Fitch, as applicable. Credit ratings are based largely on the rating agency’s investment analysis at the time of rating and the rating assigned to any particular security is not necessarily a reflection of the issuer’s current financial condition. The rating assigned to a security by a rating agency does not necessarily reflect its assessment of the volatility of a security’s market value or of the liquidity of an investment in the security. If securities are rated differently by the rating agencies, the higher rating is applied. |
![()](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0000950123-11-018573/b84815a1b8414113.gif)
2
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of the Fund with that of the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index, an unmanaged index of the leveraged loan market. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in the Fund and the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan Index. The table includes the total returns of the Fund at net asset value. There is no sales charge. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of insurance-related sales charges or taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares. Please refer to the report for your insurance contract for performance data reflecting insurance-related charges.
| | | | | |
Performance1 | | | | | |
| |
|
Average Annual Total Return (at net asset value) | |
| |
One Year | | | 9.12 | % | |
Five Years | | | 4.22 | | |
Life of Fund† | | | 3.33 | | |
| |
† | Inception date: 5/2/01 |
|
1 | The Fund has no sales charge. Insurance-related charges are not included in the calculation of returns. Such expenses would reduce the overall returns shown. Please refer to the report for your insurance contract for performance data reflecting insurance-related charges. |
| | | | | | | |
Total Annual | | | |
Operating Expenses2 | | |
|
Expense Ratio | | | 1.15 | % |
2 Source: Prospectus dated 5/1/10.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| |
* | Source: Morningstar, Inc. The Fund commenced investment operations on 5/2/01. The graph does not reflect the deduction of insurance-related charges or taxes that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect any commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
3
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2010 – December 31, 2010).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect expenses and charges which are, or may be imposed under the variable annuity contract or variable life insurance policy (variable contracts) (if applicable) through which your investment in the Fund is made. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs associated with an investment in vehicles which fund benefits under variable contracts and to qualified pension and retirement plans, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of investing in the Fund through variable contracts. In addition, if these expenses and charges imposed under the variable contracts were included, your costs would have been higher.
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period*
| | | |
| | (7/1/10) | | | (12/31/10) | | | (7/1/10 – 12/31/10) | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,053.70 | | | | $6.26 | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,019.10 | | | | $6.16 | | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.21% multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on June 30, 2010. Expenses shown do not include insurance-related charges. | |
4
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Senior Floating-Rate Interests — 93.9%(1) |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace and Defense — 2.8% |
|
Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. |
$ | 817 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing July 31, 2015 | | $ | 820,528 | | | |
DAE Aviation Holdings, Inc. |
| 489 | | | Term Loan, 4.04%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 484,550 | | | |
| 507 | | | Term Loan, 4.04%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 501,693 | | | |
Doncasters (Dunde HoldCo 4 Ltd.) |
| 622 | | | Term Loan, 4.26%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 565,947 | | | |
| 622 | | | Term Loan, 4.76%, Maturing July 13, 2015 | | | 565,947 | | | |
DynCorp International, LLC |
| 424 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing July 5, 2016 | | | 427,647 | | | |
Evergreen International Aviation |
| 1,563 | | | Term Loan, 10.50%, Maturing October 31, 2011(2) | | | 1,550,996 | | | |
Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition |
| 1,853 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing March 26, 2014 | | | 1,627,911 | | | |
| 132 | | | Term Loan, 2.30%, Maturing March 26, 2014 | | | 116,190 | | | |
International Lease Finance Co. |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing March 17, 2015 | | | 1,018,750 | | | |
TransDigm, Inc. |
| 925 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing December 6, 2016 | | | 935,696 | | | |
Wesco Aircraft Hardware Corp. |
| 1,262 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing September 30, 2013 | | | 1,262,430 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,878,285 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Air Transport — 0.7% |
|
Delta Air Lines, Inc. |
$ | 1,949 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing April 30, 2012 | | $ | 1,916,699 | | | |
| 676 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.54%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 655,974 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,572,673 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Automotive — 3.9% |
|
Adesa, Inc. |
$ | 856 | | | Term Loan, 3.02%, Maturing October 18, 2013 | | $ | 852,576 | | | |
Allison Transmission, Inc. |
| 1,376 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing August 7, 2014 | | | 1,347,690 | | | |
Autotrader.com, Inc. |
| 450 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 11, 2016(3) | | | 453,235 | | | |
Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group, Inc. |
| 356 | | | Term Loan, 2.76%, Maturing June 15, 2013 | | | 353,426 | | | |
Federal-Mogul Corp. |
| 657 | | | Term Loan, 2.21%, Maturing December 29, 2014 | | | 614,489 | | | |
| 2,476 | | | Term Loan, 2.20%, Maturing December 28, 2015 | | | 2,315,722 | | | |
Ford Motor Co. |
| 1,600 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing December 16, 2013 | | | 1,596,228 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 16, 2013(3) | | | 995,466 | | | |
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. |
| 3,025 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 1.96%, Maturing April 30, 2014 | | | 2,953,156 | | | |
Keystone Automotive Operations, Inc. |
| 936 | | | Term Loan, 3.76%, Maturing January 12, 2012 | | | 854,283 | | | |
Metaldyne, LLC |
| 374 | | | Term Loan, 7.75%, Maturing October 28, 2016 | | | 380,609 | | | |
Tenneco Automotive, Inc. |
| 525 | | | Term Loan, 5.27%, Maturing March 17, 2014 | | | 529,266 | | | |
TriMas Corp. |
| 190 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing August 2, 2011 | | | 191,784 | | | |
Viking Acquisition |
| 375 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing November 5, 2016 | | | 376,406 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,814,336 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverage and Tobacco — 0.7% |
|
Constellation Brands, Inc. |
$ | 354 | | | Term Loan, 1.81%, Maturing June 5, 2013 | | $ | 352,684 | | | |
| 175 | | | Term Loan, 3.06%, Maturing June 5, 2015 | | | 176,105 | | | |
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters |
| 1,975 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing December 16, 2016 | | | 1,981,996 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,510,785 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building and Development — 1.8% |
|
Armstrong World Industries, Inc. |
$ | 275 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing May 23, 2017 | | $ | 277,578 | | | |
Brickman Group Holdings, Inc. |
| 1,500 | | | Term Loan, 7.25%, Maturing October 14, 2016 | | | 1,521,251 | | | |
Building Materials Corp. of America |
| 1,056 | | | Term Loan, 3.06%, Maturing February 24, 2014 | | | 1,057,326 | | | |
Contech Construction Products |
| 731 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing January 31, 2013 | | | 619,809 | | | |
NCI Building Systems, Inc. |
| 85 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing April 18, 2014 | | | 82,798 | | | |
RE/MAX International, Inc. |
| 2,208 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing April 15, 2016 | | | 2,222,114 | | | |
South Edge, LLC |
| 1,750 | | | Term Loan, 0.00%, Maturing October 31, 2009(4) | | | 625,625 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,406,501 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Business Equipment and Services — 8.7% |
|
Activant Solutions, Inc. |
$ | 125 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing May 2, 2013 | | $ | 123,445 | | | |
| 749 | | | Term Loan, 4.81%, Maturing February 2, 2016 | | | 749,766 | | | |
Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc. |
| 800 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing December 18, 2017 | | | 803,300 | | | |
Affinion Group, Inc. |
| 997 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing October 10, 2016 | | | 994,526 | | | |
Allied Barton Security Services |
| 869 | | | Term Loan, 7.75%, Maturing February 18, 2015 | | | 877,082 | | | |
Dealer Computer Services, Inc. |
| 926 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing April 21, 2017 | | | 933,166 | | | |
Education Management, LLC |
| 992 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing June 3, 2013 | | | 969,935 | | | |
Fifth Third Processing Solution |
| 400 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing November 3, 2016 | | | 403,800 | | | |
Information Resources, Inc. |
| 464 | | | Term Loan, 3.30%, Maturing May 16, 2014 | | | 457,034 | | | |
iPayment, Inc. |
| 994 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing May 10, 2013 | | | 964,269 | | | |
Language Line, Inc. |
| 950 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing July 3, 2016 | | | 959,500 | | | |
NE Customer Service |
| 1,903 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing March 23, 2016 | | | 1,894,775 | | | |
Protection One Alarm Monitor, Inc. |
| 1,463 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing May 16, 2016 | | | 1,468,056 | | | |
Sabre, Inc. |
| 2,597 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing September 30, 2014 | | | 2,425,639 | | | |
Safenet, Inc. |
| 724 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing April 12, 2014 | | | 698,419 | | | |
Serena Software, Inc. |
| 1,648 | | | Term Loan, 2.30%, Maturing March 10, 2013 | | | 1,610,973 | | | |
Sitel (Client Logic) |
| 1,132 | | | Term Loan, 5.79%, Maturing January 30, 2014 | | | 1,081,305 | | | |
Softlayer Tech, Inc. |
| 275 | | | Term Loan, 7.75%, Maturing November 5, 2016 | | | 276,461 | | | |
SunGard Data Systems, Inc. |
| 389 | | | Term Loan, 2.01%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 380,364 | | | |
| 647 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 651,260 | | | |
| 3,973 | | | Term Loan, 3.91%, Maturing February 26, 2016 | | | 3,949,164 | | | |
Trans Union, LLC |
| 1,866 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing June 15, 2017 | | | 1,895,009 | | | |
Transaction Network Service, Inc. |
| 950 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing November 18, 2015 | | | 955,462 | | | |
Travelport, LLC |
| 2,381 | | | Term Loan, 4.96%, Maturing August 21, 2015 | | | 2,261,305 | | | |
URS Corp. |
| 225 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing May 15, 2013 | | | 224,915 | | | |
West Corp. |
| 309 | | | Term Loan, 2.72%, Maturing October 24, 2013 | | | 306,810 | | | |
| 1,847 | | | Term Loan, 4.57%, Maturing July 15, 2016 | | | 1,855,374 | | | |
| 758 | | | Term Loan, 4.59%, Maturing July 15, 2016 | | | 760,626 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 30,931,740 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Cable and Satellite Television — 4.6% |
|
Atlantic Broadband Finance, LLC |
$ | 603 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing November 27, 2015 | | $ | 608,068 | | | |
Bresnan Communications, LLC |
| 1,025 | | | Term Loan, 4.50%, Maturing December 14, 2017 | | | 1,032,687 | | | |
Cequel Communications, LLC |
| 2,518 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing November 5, 2013 | | | 2,497,495 | | | |
Charter Communications Operating, LLC |
| 3,822 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing March 6, 2014 | | | 3,780,143 | | | |
| 500 | | | Term Loan, Maturing September 6, 2016(3) | | | 494,531 | | | |
Insight Midwest Holdings, LLC |
| 2,126 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing April 7, 2014 | | | 2,074,157 | | | |
MCC Iowa, LLC |
| 1,939 | | | Term Loan, 2.01%, Maturing January 31, 2015 | | | 1,864,239 | | | |
UPC Broadband Holding B.V. |
| 3,100 | | | Term Loan, 4.25%, Maturing December 30, 2016 | | | 3,075,803 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 29, 2017(3) | | | 986,719 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 16,413,842 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics — 4.2% |
|
Arizona Chemical, Inc. |
$ | 247 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing November 21, 2016 | | $ | 250,587 | | | |
Brenntag Holding GmbH and Co. KG |
| 2,477 | | | Term Loan, 3.77%, Maturing January 20, 2014 | | | 2,481,698 | | | |
| 266 | | | Term Loan, 3.79%, Maturing January 20, 2014 | | | 266,954 | | | |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 6.45%, Maturing July 17, 2015 | | | 1,007,083 | | | |
Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. |
| 496 | | | Term Loan, 2.35%, Maturing May 5, 2013 | | | 452,591 | | | |
| 295 | | | Term Loan, 4.06%, Maturing May 5, 2015 | | | 292,574 | | | |
| 483 | | | Term Loan, 4.06%, Maturing May 5, 2015 | | | 476,469 | | | |
| 704 | | | Term Loan, 4.06%, Maturing May 5, 2015 | | | 696,998 | | | |
| 798 | | | Term Loan, 4.06%, Maturing May 5, 2015 | | | 791,816 | | | |
Huish Detergents, Inc. |
| 579 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing April 26, 2014 | | | 554,570 | | | |
Huntsman International, LLC |
| 1,646 | | | Term Loan, 1.78%, Maturing April 21, 2014 | | | 1,613,111 | | | |
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Chemicals and Plastics (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
INEOS Group |
$ | 1,199 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing December 16, 2013 | | $ | 1,239,869 | | | |
| 1,200 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing December 16, 2014 | | | 1,240,819 | | | |
ISP Chemco, Inc. |
| 1,313 | | | Term Loan, 1.81%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 1,289,413 | | | |
Millenium Inorganic Chemicals |
| 771 | | | Term Loan, 2.55%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 763,619 | | | |
Nalco Co. |
| 599 | | | Term Loan, 4.50%, Maturing October 5, 2017 | | | 604,635 | | | |
Omnova Solutions, Inc. |
| 225 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing May 31, 2017 | | | 227,250 | | | |
Styron S.A.R.L. |
| 707 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing June 17, 2016 | | | 718,583 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 14,968,639 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Conglomerates — 1.3% |
|
Goodman Global Holdings, Inc. |
$ | 773 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing October 28, 2016 | | $ | 778,308 | | | |
Manitowoc Company, Inc. (The) |
| 1,067 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing November 6, 2014 | | | 1,078,069 | | | |
RBS Global, Inc. |
| 1,651 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing July 19, 2013 | | | 1,614,628 | | | |
Service Master Co. |
| 90 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing July 24, 2014 | | | 86,809 | | | |
| 907 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing July 24, 2014 | | | 871,708 | | | |
US Investigations Services, Inc. |
| 238 | | | Term Loan, 3.05%, Maturing February 21, 2015 | | | 228,862 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,658,384 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Containers and Glass Products — 4.4% |
|
Berry Plastics Corp. |
$ | 1,827 | | | Term Loan, 2.28%, Maturing April 3, 2015 | | $ | 1,728,038 | | | |
Consolidated Container Co. |
| 681 | | | Term Loan, 2.50%, Maturing March 28, 2014 | | | 629,679 | | | |
Graham Packaging Holdings Co. |
| 2,203 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing April 5, 2014 | | | 2,229,059 | | | |
Graphic Packaging International, Inc. |
| 2,456 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing May 16, 2014 | | | 2,426,802 | | | |
JSG Acquisitions |
| 126 | | | Term Loan, 3.66%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 124,818 | | | |
Kranson Industries, Inc. |
| 265 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing July 31, 2013 | | | 253,946 | | | |
Pelican Products, Inc. |
| 325 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing November 30, 2016 | | | 327,133 | | | |
Reynolds Group Holdings, Inc. |
| 500 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing May 5, 2016 | | | 505,554 | | | |
| 1,975 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing May 5, 2016 | | | 1,995,574 | | | |
Smurfit Kappa Acquisitions |
| 126 | | | Term Loan, 3.41%, Maturing December 31, 2014 | | | 124,818 | | | |
Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. |
| 4,129 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing July 15, 2016 | | | 4,204,609 | | | |
Tegrant Holding Corp. |
| 963 | | | Term Loan, 3.54%, Maturing March 8, 2013 | | | 890,312 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,440,342 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Cosmetics / Toiletries — 1.0% |
|
Bausch & Lomb, Inc. |
$ | 1,873 | | | Term Loan, 3.54%, Maturing April 24, 2015 | | $ | 1,867,407 | | | |
Prestige Brands, Inc. |
| 1,772 | | | Term Loan, 4.75%, Maturing March 24, 2016 | | | 1,789,552 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,656,959 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Drugs — 0.6% |
|
Graceway Pharmaceuticals, LLC |
$ | 1,124 | | | Term Loan, 5.01%, Maturing May 3, 2012 | | $ | 500,061 | | | |
Pharmaceutical Holdings Corp. |
| 65 | | | Term Loan, 4.52%, Maturing January 30, 2012 | | | 64,011 | | | |
Royal Pharma Finance Trust |
| 469 | | | Term Loan, 2.55%, Maturing April 16, 2013 | | | 468,011 | | | |
Warner Chilcott Corp. |
| 1,023 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing October 30, 2014 | | | 1,026,709 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,058,792 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Ecological Services and Equipment — 0.2% |
|
Synagro Technologies, Inc. |
$ | 724 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | $ | 644,137 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 644,137 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronics / Electrical — 2.0% |
|
Aspect Software, Inc. |
$ | 1,469 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing April 19, 2016 | | $ | 1,477,163 | | | |
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. |
| 1,389 | | | Term Loan, 4.51%, Maturing December 1, 2016 | | | 1,348,691 | | | |
Infor Enterprise Solutions Holdings |
| 739 | | | Term Loan, 6.02%, Maturing July 28, 2015 | | | 706,721 | | | |
Sensata Technologies Finance Co. |
| 1,484 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing April 26, 2013 | | | 1,452,136 | | | |
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Electronics / Electrical (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Shield Finance Co. S.A.R.L. |
$ | 419 | | | Term Loan, 7.75%, Maturing June 15, 2016 | | $ | 418,625 | | | |
Spectrum Brands, Inc. |
| 1,315 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing June 16, 2016 | | | 1,343,527 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,746,863 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Farming / Agriculture — 0.3% |
|
CF Industries, Inc. |
$ | 757 | | | Term Loan, 4.25%, Maturing April 6, 2015 | | $ | 761,799 | | | |
Earthbound Farm Holdings III, LLC |
| 300 | | | Term Loan, 7.25%, Maturing December 21, 2016 | | | 302,625 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,064,424 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Financial Intermediaries — 3.2% |
|
Citco III, Ltd. |
$ | 1,000 | | | Term Loan, Maturing June 30, 2014(3) | | $ | 970,000 | | | |
E.A. Viner International Co. |
| 180 | | | Term Loan, 4.81%, Maturing July 31, 2013 | | | 178,227 | | | |
EURONET Worldwide, Inc. |
| 847 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing April 4, 2014 | | | 817,033 | | | |
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. |
| 1,197 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing July 18, 2016 | | | 1,213,578 | | | |
First Data Corp. |
| 956 | | | Term Loan, 3.01%, Maturing September 24, 2014 | | | 883,189 | | | |
Grosvenor Capital Management |
| 997 | | | Term Loan, 4.31%, Maturing December 5, 2016 | | | 984,343 | | | |
HarbourVest Partners, LLC |
| 550 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing December 14, 2016 | | | 552,750 | | | |
Interactive Data Corp. |
| 697 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing January 27, 2017 | | | 707,380 | | | |
LPL Holdings, Inc. |
| 612 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing June 28, 2013 | | | 612,585 | | | |
| 1,925 | | | Term Loan, 4.25%, Maturing June 25, 2015 | | | 1,939,674 | | | |
Nuveen Investments, Inc. |
| 664 | | | Term Loan, 3.30%, Maturing November 13, 2014 | | | 633,278 | | | |
| 776 | | | Term Loan, 5.80%, Maturing May 12, 2017 | | | 739,966 | | | |
Oxford Acquisition III, Ltd. |
| 748 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 12, 2014 | | | 710,249 | | | |
RJO Holdings Corp. (RJ O’Brien) |
| 7 | | | Term Loan, 6.27%, Maturing December 10, 2015(5) | | | 6,152 | | | |
| 237 | | | Term Loan, 6.27%, Maturing December 10, 2015(5) | | | 189,879 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,138,283 | | | |
|
|
|
Food Products — 2.4% |
|
Acosta, Inc. |
$ | 2,837 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing July 28, 2013 | | $ | 2,805,887 | | | |
Dean Foods Co. |
| 2,170 | | | Term Loan, 1.81%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 2,084,414 | | | |
Dole Food Company, Inc. |
| 701 | | | Term Loan, 5.06%, Maturing March 2, 2017 | | | 706,135 | | | |
Michael Foods Holdings, Inc. |
| 346 | | | Term Loan, 6.26%, Maturing June 29, 2016 | | | 351,052 | | | |
Pierre Foods, Inc. |
| 524 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing September 30, 2016 | | | 522,160 | | | |
Pinnacle Foods Finance, LLC |
| 2,046 | | | Term Loan, 2.76%, Maturing April 2, 2014 | | | 2,010,629 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,480,277 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Service — 3.8% |
|
Aramark Corp. |
$ | 48 | | | Term Loan, 2.14%, Maturing January 27, 2014 | | $ | 47,972 | | | |
| 898 | | | Term Loan, 2.18%, Maturing January 27, 2014 | | | 891,681 | | | |
| 185 | | | Term Loan, 3.51%, Maturing July 26, 2016 | | | 185,315 | | | |
| 2,816 | | | Term Loan, 3.55%, Maturing July 26, 2016 | | | 2,817,834 | | | |
Buffets, Inc. |
| 108 | | | Term Loan, 7.65%, Maturing April 22, 2015(2) | | | 82,794 | | | |
Burger King Corp. |
| 2,175 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing October 19, 2016 | | | 2,209,374 | | | |
CBRL Group, Inc. |
| 144 | | | Term Loan, 1.79%, Maturing April 29, 2013 | | | 143,307 | | | |
DineEquity, Inc. |
| 774 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing October 19, 2017 | | | 787,080 | | | |
Dunkin Brands, Inc. |
| 900 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing November 23, 2017 | | | 911,918 | | | |
JRD Holdings, Inc. |
| 2,188 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing July 2, 2014 | | | 2,164,263 | | | |
NPC International, Inc. |
| 745 | | | Term Loan, 2.03%, Maturing May 3, 2013 | | | 731,206 | | | |
OSI Restaurant Partners, LLC |
| 159 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing June 14, 2013 | | | 152,357 | | | |
| 1,512 | | | Term Loan, 2.63%, Maturing June 14, 2014 | | | 1,447,526 | | | |
Weight Watchers International, Inc. |
| 299 | | | Term Loan, 1.81%, Maturing January 26, 2014 | | | 296,990 | | | |
| 663 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing June 30, 2016 | | | 665,596 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,535,213 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Food / Drug Retailers — 3.1% |
|
General Nutrition Centers, Inc. |
$ | 2,555 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing September 16, 2013 | | $ | 2,540,373 | | | |
NBTY, Inc. |
| 875 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing October 2, 2017 | | | 888,486 | | | |
Pantry, Inc. (The) |
| 564 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing May 15, 2014 | | | 544,773 | | | |
Rite Aid Corp. |
| 3,982 | | | Term Loan, 2.02%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 3,631,867 | | | |
Roundy’s Supermarkets, Inc. |
| 871 | | | Term Loan, 3.76%, Maturing November 3, 2011 | | | 870,607 | | | |
| 2,573 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing November 3, 2013 | | | 2,577,293 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,053,399 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Forest Products — 0.6% |
|
Georgia-Pacific Corp. |
$ | 2,183 | | | Term Loan, 2.30%, Maturing December 21, 2012 | | $ | 2,184,362 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,184,362 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care — 10.6% |
|
Ascend Learning |
$ | 475 | | | Term Loan, 7.75%, Maturing December 6, 2016 | | $ | 466,688 | | | |
Aveta Holdings, LLC |
| 522 | | | Term Loan, 8.50%, Maturing April 14, 2015 | | | 517,695 | | | |
| 522 | | | Term Loan, 8.50%, Maturing April 14, 2015 | | | 517,695 | | | |
Biomet, Inc. |
| 3,033 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing March 25, 2015 | | | 3,028,329 | | | |
Bright Horizons Family Solutions, Inc. |
| 780 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing May 28, 2015 | | | 784,806 | | | |
Cardinal Health 409, Inc. |
| 2,304 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing April 10, 2014 | | | 2,194,703 | | | |
Carestream Health, Inc. |
| 2,500 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing April 30, 2013 | | | 2,453,472 | | | |
Community Health Systems, Inc. |
| 50 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 48,446 | | | |
| 3,294 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 3,217,180 | | | |
| 1,599 | | | Term Loan, 3.79%, Maturing January 25, 2017 | | | 1,595,645 | | | |
ConMed Corp. |
| 645 | | | Term Loan, 1.77%, Maturing April 12, 2013 | | | 606,628 | | | |
ConvaTec Cidron |
| 300 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing December 22, 2016 | | | 304,028 | | | |
CRC Health Corp. |
| 743 | | | Term Loan, 2.55%, Maturing February 6, 2013 | | | 720,404 | | | |
DaVita, Inc. |
| 1,275 | | | Term Loan, 4.50%, Maturing October 20, 2016 | | | 1,288,775 | | | |
Fenwal, Inc. |
| 145 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 127,303 | | | |
| 843 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 742,600 | | | |
Grifols SA |
| 900 | | | Term Loan, Maturing November 23, 2016(3) | | | 911,625 | | | |
Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. |
| 275 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing November 17, 2016 | | | 277,750 | | | |
HCA, Inc. |
| 4,772 | | | Term Loan, 3.55%, Maturing March 31, 2017 | | | 4,771,502 | | | |
Health Management Associates, Inc. |
| 3,995 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 3,927,585 | | | |
Medassets, Inc. |
| 400 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing November 16, 2016 | | | 402,583 | | | |
Mylan, Inc. |
| 526 | | | Term Loan, 3.56%, Maturing October 2, 2014 | | | 527,981 | | | |
National Mentor Holdings, Inc. |
| 106 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 101,437 | | | |
| 1,619 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing June 29, 2013 | | | 1,553,826 | | | |
Physiotherapy Associates, Inc. |
| 459 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing June 27, 2013 | | | 431,296 | | | |
Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. |
| 970 | | | Term Loan, 7.25%, Maturing April 22, 2015 | | | 943,441 | | | |
ReAble Therapeutics Finance, LLC |
| 1,835 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing November 18, 2013 | | | 1,833,002 | | | |
Renal Advantage Holdings, Inc. |
| 325 | | | Term Loan, 5.75%, Maturing December 16, 2016 | | | 326,930 | | | |
Res-Care, Inc. |
| 375 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing December 22, 2016 | | | 369,375 | | | |
Select Medical Holdings Corp. |
| 522 | | | Term Loan, 4.05%, Maturing August 22, 2014 | | | 523,539 | | | |
Sunquest Information Systems, Inc. |
| 325 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing December 16, 2016 | | | 325,000 | | | |
Sunrise Medical Holdings, Inc. |
| 379 | | | Term Loan, 8.25%, Maturing May 13, 2014 | | | 350,262 | | | |
VWR Funding, Inc. |
| 1,273 | | | Term Loan, 2.76%, Maturing June 30, 2014 | | | 1,242,587 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 37,434,118 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Home Furnishings — 0.4% |
|
Hunter Fan Co. |
$ | 222 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing April 16, 2014 | | $ | 198,986 | | | |
National Bedding Co., LLC |
| 1,291 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 5.31%, Maturing February 28, 2014 | | | 1,258,612 | | | |
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Home Furnishings (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Oreck Corp. |
$ | 93 | | | Term Loan - Second Lien, 3.80%, Maturing March 19, 2016(5) | | $ | 83,766 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,541,364 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Equipment — 2.5% |
|
Brand Energy and Infrastructure Services, Inc. |
$ | 507 | | | Term Loan, 3.56%, Maturing February 7, 2014 | | $ | 495,563 | | | |
Butterfly Wendel US, Inc. |
| 423 | | | Term Loan, 3.54%, Maturing June 23, 2014 | | | 390,156 | | | |
| 577 | | | Term Loan, 4.04%, Maturing June 22, 2015 | | | 532,344 | | | |
EPD Holdings, (Goodyear Engineering Products) |
| 125 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 110,277 | | | |
| 872 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing July 31, 2014 | | | 769,949 | | | |
Gleason Corp. |
| 459 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing June 30, 2013 | | | 449,388 | | | |
Itron, Inc. |
| 163 | | | Term Loan, 3.77%, Maturing April 18, 2014 | | | 163,582 | | | |
Jason, Inc. |
| 46 | | | Term Loan, 8.25%, Maturing September 21, 2014 | | | 45,848 | | | |
| 117 | | | Term Loan, 8.25%, Maturing September 21, 2014 | | | 116,786 | | | |
John Maneely Co. |
| 2,524 | | | Term Loan, 3.54%, Maturing December 9, 2013 | | | 2,482,515 | | | |
Kinetek Acquisition Corp. |
| 46 | | | Term Loan, 3.94%, Maturing November 11, 2013 | | | 40,611 | | | |
| 450 | | | Term Loan, 3.94%, Maturing November 11, 2013 | | | 400,411 | | | |
Pinafore, LLC |
| 888 | | | Term Loan, 6.25%, Maturing September 29, 2016 | | | 901,517 | | | |
Polypore, Inc. |
| 2,069 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing July 3, 2014 | | | 2,045,939 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 8,944,886 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 2.7% |
|
Alliant Holdings I, Inc. |
$ | 1,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.30%, Maturing August 21, 2014 | | $ | 980,000 | | | |
Applied Systems, Inc. |
| 600 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing December 6, 2016 | | | 602,250 | | | |
CCC Information Services Group, Inc. |
| 625 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing November 11, 2015 | | | 630,266 | | | |
Conseco, Inc. |
| 625 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing September 30, 2016 | | | 630,469 | | | |
Crawford & Company |
| 822 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing October 30, 2013 | | | 813,226 | | | |
Crump Group, Inc. |
| 442 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing August 1, 2014 | | | 429,038 | | | |
HUB International Holdings, Inc. |
| 637 | | | Term Loan, 2.80%, Maturing June 13, 2014 | | | 620,024 | | | |
| 1,447 | | | Term Loan, 2.80%, Maturing June 13, 2014 | | | 1,407,230 | | | |
| 864 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing June 13, 2014 | | | 865,575 | | | |
U.S.I. Holdings Corp. |
| 1,438 | | | Term Loan, 2.77%, Maturing May 5, 2014 | | | 1,392,890 | | | |
| 987 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing May 5, 2014 | | | 977,625 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,348,593 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Leisure Goods / Activities / Movies — 5.6% |
|
AMC Entertainment, Inc. |
$ | 2,035 | | | Term Loan, 3.50%, Maturing December 16, 2016 | | $ | 2,043,344 | | | |
AMF Bowling Worldwide, Inc. |
| 447 | | | Term Loan, 2.76%, Maturing June 8, 2013 | | | 397,440 | | | |
Carmike Cinemas, Inc. |
| 2,032 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing January 27, 2016 | | | 2,043,654 | | | |
Cinemark, Inc. |
| 2,921 | | | Term Loan, 3.53%, Maturing April 29, 2016 | | | 2,940,496 | | | |
ClubCorp Club Operations, Inc. |
| 275 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing November 9, 2016 | | | 277,234 | | | |
Fender Musical Instruments Corp. |
| 610 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing June 9, 2014 | | | 568,878 | | | |
Miramax Film NY, LLC |
| 425 | | | Term Loan, 7.75%, Maturing May 20, 2016 | | | 431,375 | | | |
Regal Cinemas Corp. |
| 2,994 | | | Term Loan, 3.80%, Maturing November 21, 2016 | | | 3,009,215 | | | |
Revolution Studios Distribution Co., LLC |
| 535 | | | Term Loan, 4.02%, Maturing December 21, 2014 | | | 425,400 | | | |
Six Flags Theme Parks, Inc. |
| 2,767 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing June 30, 2016 | | | 2,796,609 | | | |
Universal City Development Partners, Ltd. |
| 3,140 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing November 6, 2014 | | | 3,173,665 | | | |
Zuffa, LLC |
| 1,722 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing June 19, 2015 | | | 1,696,590 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 19,803,900 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lodging and Casinos — 2.2% |
|
Ameristar Casinos, Inc. |
$ | 714 | | | Term Loan, 3.54%, Maturing November 10, 2012 | | $ | 714,939 | | | |
Harrah’s Operating Co. |
| 1,417 | | | Term Loan, 3.29%, Maturing January 28, 2015 | | | 1,284,919 | | | |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Lodging and Casinos (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Herbst Gaming, Inc. |
$ | 731 | | | Term Loan, 10.00%, Maturing December 31, 2015 | | $ | 747,531 | | | |
Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. |
| 480 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing July 26, 2014 | | | 480,817 | | | |
| 574 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing July 26, 2014 | | | 575,583 | | | |
| 1,436 | | | Term Loan, 5.00%, Maturing July 26, 2014 | | | 1,438,955 | | | |
Las Vegas Sands, LLC |
| 1,294 | | | Term Loan, 3.03%, Maturing November 23, 2016 | | | 1,247,999 | | | |
Tropicana Entertainment, Inc. |
| 372 | | | Term Loan, 15.00%, Maturing March 8, 2013 | | | 409,751 | | | |
VML US Finance, LLC |
| 69 | | | Term Loan, 4.80%, Maturing May 25, 2012 | | | 68,995 | | | |
| 137 | | | Term Loan, 4.80%, Maturing May 23, 2013 | | | 137,989 | | | |
| 742 | | | Term Loan, 4.80%, Maturing May 23, 2013 | | | 743,827 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,851,305 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Nonferrous Metals / Minerals — 1.1% |
|
Noranda Aluminum Acquisition |
$ | 309 | | | Term Loan, 2.01%, Maturing May 18, 2014 | | $ | 306,366 | | | |
Novelis, Inc. |
| 875 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing December 19, 2016 | | | 887,578 | | | |
Oxbow Carbon and Mineral Holdings |
| 1,898 | | | Term Loan, 3.80%, Maturing May 8, 2016 | | | 1,896,503 | | | |
Tube City IMS Corp. |
| 858 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing January 25, 2014 | | | 810,159 | | | |
| 108 | | | Term Loan, 2.30%, Maturing January 25, 2014 | | | 102,027 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 4,002,633 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas — 2.0% |
|
Big West Oil, LLC |
$ | 325 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing March 31, 2016 | | $ | 329,063 | | | |
CGGVeritas Services, Inc. |
| 918 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing January 12, 2016 | | | 922,016 | | | |
CITGO Petroleum Corp. |
| 268 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing June 24, 2015 | | | 277,132 | | | |
| 1,244 | | | Term Loan, 9.00%, Maturing June 23, 2017 | | | 1,299,331 | | | |
Dynegy Holdings, Inc. |
| 155 | | | Term Loan, 4.02%, Maturing April 2, 2013 | | | 153,890 | | | |
| 2,553 | | | Term Loan, 4.02%, Maturing April 2, 2013 | | | 2,540,116 | | | |
Obsidian Natural Gas Trust |
| 1,400 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing November 2, 2015 | | | 1,417,500 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 6,939,048 | | | |
|
|
|
Publishing — 4.3% |
|
Black Press US Partnership |
$ | 314 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | $ | 285,960 | | | |
| 518 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing August 2, 2013 | | | 470,993 | | | |
GateHouse Media Operating, Inc. |
| 867 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 344,061 | | | |
| 2,227 | | | Term Loan, 2.27%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 884,051 | | | |
| 998 | | | Term Loan, 2.52%, Maturing August 28, 2014 | | | 396,165 | | | |
Getty Images, Inc. |
| 2,743 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing November 7, 2016 | | | 2,770,213 | | | |
MediaNews Group, Inc. |
| 561 | | | Term Loan, 8.50%, Maturing March 19, 2014 | | | 552,569 | | | |
Nelson Education, Ltd. |
| 331 | | | Term Loan, 2.80%, Maturing July 5, 2014 | | | 284,625 | | | |
Newspaper Holdings, Inc. |
| 309 | | | Term Loan, 1.81%, Maturing July 24, 2014(5) | | | 194,376 | | | |
Nielsen Finance, LLC |
| 2,485 | | | Term Loan, 2.26%, Maturing August 9, 2013 | | | 2,460,901 | | | |
| 2,446 | | | Term Loan, 4.01%, Maturing May 2, 2016 | | | 2,438,106 | | | |
SGS International, Inc. |
| 189 | | | Term Loan, 3.96%, Maturing September 30, 2013 | | | 186,686 | | | |
| 2,431 | | | Term Loan, 3.96%, Maturing September 30, 2013 | | | 2,406,960 | | | |
Source Interlink Companies, Inc. |
| 452 | | | Term Loan, 7.25%, Maturing June 18, 2013 | | | 431,904 | | | |
| 284 | | | Term Loan, 15.00%, Maturing March 18, 2014(2) | | | 207,550 | | | |
Source Media, Inc. |
| 575 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing November 8, 2011 | | | 553,698 | | | |
Star Tribune Co. (The) |
| 125 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing September 28, 2014 | | | 111,661 | | | |
| 112 | | | Term Loan, 8.00%, Maturing September 29, 2014 | | | 99,255 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 15,079,734 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Radio and Television — 1.1% |
|
LBI Media, Inc. |
$ | 238 | | | Term Loan, 1.76%, Maturing March 31, 2012 | | $ | 224,830 | | | |
Local TV Finance, LLC |
| 965 | | | Term Loan, 2.31%, Maturing May 7, 2013 | | | 921,173 | | | |
NEP II, Inc. |
| 771 | | | Term Loan, 2.54%, Maturing February 16, 2014 | | | 748,308 | | | |
Univision Communications, Inc. |
| 1,066 | | | Term Loan, 2.51%, Maturing September 29, 2014 | | | 1,020,134 | | | |
| 1,066 | | | Term Loan, 4.51%, Maturing March 31, 2017 | | | 1,015,011 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 3,929,456 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements11
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Rail Industries — 0.5% |
|
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. |
$ | 1,857 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing April 26, 2013 | | $ | 1,829,322 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,829,322 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Retailers (Except Food and Drug) — 3.2% |
|
Amscan Holdings, Inc. |
$ | 673 | | | Term Loan, 7.35%, Maturing December 4, 2017 | | $ | 673,944 | | | |
Dollar General Corp. |
| 1,000 | | | Term Loan, 3.01%, Maturing July 7, 2014 | | | 1,000,850 | | | |
Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc. |
| 775 | | | Term Loan, 6.50%, Maturing December 22, 2017 | | | 775,000 | | | |
Michaels Stores, Inc. |
| 972 | | | Term Loan, 2.56%, Maturing October 31, 2013 | | | 948,524 | | | |
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. |
| 2,415 | | | Term Loan, 4.30%, Maturing April 6, 2016 | | | 2,395,074 | | | |
Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. |
| 798 | | | Term Loan, 3.28%, Maturing July 25, 2014 | | | 747,417 | | | |
Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. |
| 1,025 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing November 24, 2017 | | | 1,033,245 | | | |
Pilot Travel Centers, LLC |
| 1,678 | | | Term Loan, 5.25%, Maturing June 30, 2016 | | | 1,705,778 | | | |
Rent-A-Center, Inc. |
| 5 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing June 30, 2012 | | | 5,431 | | | |
Visant Corp. |
| 449 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing December 22, 2016 | | | 454,533 | | | |
Yankee Candle Company, Inc. (The) |
| 1,742 | | | Term Loan, 2.29%, Maturing February 6, 2014 | | | 1,723,265 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 11,463,061 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Steel — 0.4% |
|
Niagara Corp. |
$ | 1,375 | | | Term Loan, 10.50%, Maturing June 29, 2014(2)(5) | | $ | 1,302,140 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,302,140 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Surface Transport — 0.6% |
|
Swift Transportation Co., Inc. |
$ | 2,025 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing December 16, 2016 | | $ | 2,030,316 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,030,316 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Telecommunications — 3.8% |
|
Alaska Communications Systems Holdings, Inc. |
$ | 775 | | | Term Loan, 5.50%, Maturing October 21, 2016 | | $ | 779,359 | | | |
Asurion Corp. |
| 2,004 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing July 3, 2014 | | | 1,906,174 | | | |
| 575 | | | Term Loan, 6.75%, Maturing March 31, 2015 | | | 577,310 | | | |
Cellular South, Inc. |
| 369 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing May 29, 2014 | | | 367,066 | | | |
CommScope, Inc. |
| 1,989 | | | Term Loan, 4.00%, Maturing December 26, 2014 | | | 1,990,474 | | | |
Intelsat Corp. |
| 233 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 232,614 | | | |
| 233 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 232,614 | | | |
| 233 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 232,746 | | | |
| 1,071 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 1,069,449 | | | |
| 1,071 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 1,069,449 | | | |
| 1,073 | | | Term Loan, 2.79%, Maturing January 3, 2014 | | | 1,070,816 | | | |
Syniverse Technologies, Inc. |
| 625 | | | Term Loan, Maturing December 21, 2017(3) | | | 633,594 | | | |
Telesat Canada, Inc. |
| 143 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing October 31, 2014 | | | 142,502 | | | |
| 1,663 | | | Term Loan, 3.27%, Maturing October 31, 2014 | | | 1,659,011 | | | |
TowerCo Finance, LLC |
| 668 | | | Term Loan, 6.00%, Maturing November 24, 2014 | | | 676,185 | | | |
Windstream Corp. |
| 794 | | | Term Loan, 3.04%, Maturing December 17, 2015 | | | 799,154 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 13,438,517 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Utilities — 2.6% |
|
AEI Finance Holding, LLC |
$ | 106 | | | Revolving Loan, 3.30%, Maturing March 30, 2012 | | $ | 104,862 | | | |
| 861 | | | Term Loan, 3.30%, Maturing March 30, 2014 | | | 849,081 | | | |
Astoria Generating Co. |
| 474 | | | Term Loan, 2.06%, Maturing February 23, 2013 | | | 471,441 | | | |
BRSP, LLC |
| 967 | | | Term Loan, 7.50%, Maturing June 4, 2014 | | | 974,010 | | | |
Calpine Corp. |
| 648 | | | Term Loan, 3.15%, Maturing March 29, 2014 | | | 648,216 | | | |
Covanta Energy Corp. |
| 214 | | | Term Loan, 1.80%, Maturing February 10, 2014 | | | 211,440 | | | |
| 418 | | | Term Loan, 1.81%, Maturing February 10, 2014 | | | 413,085 | | | |
New Development Holdings, Inc. |
| 987 | | | Term Loan, 7.00%, Maturing July 3, 2017 | | | 1,005,261 | | | |
NRG Energy, Inc. |
| 68 | | | Term Loan, 2.04%, Maturing February 1, 2013 | | | 67,247 | | | |
| 1 | | | Term Loan, 2.05%, Maturing February 1, 2013 | | | 953 | | | |
| 321 | | | Term Loan, 3.55%, Maturing August 31, 2015 | | | 321,916 | | | |
| 2,501 | | | Term Loan, 3.55%, Maturing August 31, 2015 | | | 2,504,312 | | | |
See notes to financial statements12
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Borrower/Tranche Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
Utilities (continued) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
TXU Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Co., LLC |
$ | 2,200 | | | Term Loan, 3.76%, Maturing October 10, 2014 | | $ | 1,704,191 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 9,276,015 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Senior Floating-Rate Interests | | |
(identified cost $323,342,913) | | $ | 332,372,644 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes — 0.4% |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Containers and Glass Products — 0.3% |
|
Berry Plastics Corp., Sr. Notes, Variable Rate |
$ | 1,000 | | | 5.039%, 2/15/15 | | $ | 970,000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 970,000 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electronics / Electrical — 0.1% |
|
NXP BV/NXP Funding, LLC, Variable Rate |
$ | 300 | | | 3.039%, 10/15/13 | | $ | 296,625 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 296,625 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Corporate Bonds & Notes | | |
(identified cost $1,262,898) | | $ | 1,266,625 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 1.4% |
|
Shares | | | Security | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Automotive — 0.2% |
|
| 15,250 | | | Dayco Products, LLC(6)(7) | | $ | 781,087 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 781,087 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Building and Development — 0.0%(8) |
|
| 97,223 | | | Contech Construction Holdings, Inc.(5)(7) | | $ | 7,584 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 7,584 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Manufacturing — 0.1% |
|
| 296,515 | | | MEGA Brands, Inc.(7) | | $ | 191,344 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 191,344 | | | |
|
|
|
Financial Intermediaries — 0.0%(8) |
|
| 82 | | | RTS Investor Corp.(5)(6)(7) | | $ | 1,934 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,934 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Service — 0.0%(8) |
|
| 20,871 | | | Buffets, Inc.(5)(7) | | $ | 78,266 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 78,266 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Home Furnishings — 0.0%(8) |
|
| 1,658 | | | Oreck Corp.(5)(6)(7) | | $ | 128,959 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 128,959 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Lodging and Casinos — 0.4% |
|
| 41,797 | | | Herbst Gaming, Inc.(5)(6)(7) | | $ | 257,888 | | | |
| 71,982 | | | Tropicana Entertainment, Inc.(5)(6)(7) | | | 1,106,723 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 1,364,611 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Publishing — 0.6% |
|
| 399 | | | Ion Media Networks, Inc.(5)(6)(7) | | $ | 185,535 | | | |
| 45,600 | | | MediaNews Group, Inc.(5)(6)(7) | | | 866,403 | | | |
| 41,667 | | | Reader’s Digest Association, Inc. (The)(5)(6)(7) | | | 989,591 | | | |
| 1,145 | | | Source Interlink Companies, Inc.(5)(6)(7) | | | 14,427 | | | |
| 4,060 | | | Star Tribune Media Holdings Co.(5)(7) | | | 85,260 | | | |
| 14,751 | | | SuperMedia, Inc.(7) | | | 128,481 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 2,269,697 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Steel — 0.1% |
|
| 22,939 | | | KNIA Holdings, Inc.(5)(6)(7) | | $ | 265,865 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 265,865 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $4,177,469) | | $ | 5,089,347 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Short-Term Investments — 6.2%
|
Time Deposits — 3.0% |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 3,503 | | | BNP Paribas Finance, Inc., 0.10%, 1/3/11 | | $ | 3,503,000 | | | |
| 3,601 | | | Societe Generale North America, 0.15%, 1/3/11 | | | 3,601,000 | | | |
See notes to financial statements13
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 3,551 | | | State Street Bank and Trust Euro Time Deposit, 0.01%, 1/3/11 | | $ | 3,551,367 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Time Deposits | | |
(identified cost $10,655,367) | | $ | 10,655,367 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Government Agency Obligations — 3.2% |
|
Principal
| | | | | | | | |
Amount
| | | | | | | | |
(000’s omitted) | | | Description | | Value | | | |
|
|
$ | 11,311 | | | Federal Home Loan Bank, 0.08%, 1/19/11 | | $ | 11,310,548 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total U.S. Government Agency Obligations | | |
(identified cost $11,310,548) | | $ | 11,310,548 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Short-Term Investments | | |
(identified cost $21,965,915) | | $ | 21,965,915 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 101.9% | | |
(identified cost $350,749,195) | | $ | 360,694,531 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — (1.9)% | | $ | (6,597,977 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 354,096,554 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
| | |
(1) | | Senior floating-rate interests (Senior Loans) often require prepayments from excess cash flows or permit the borrowers to repay at their election. The degree to which borrowers repay, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, cannot be predicted with accuracy. As a result, the actual remaining maturity may be substantially less than the stated maturities shown. However, Senior Loans will have an expected average life of approximately two to four years. The stated interest rate represents the weighted average interest rate of all contracts within the senior loan facility and includes commitment fees on unfunded loan commitments, if any. Senior Loans typically have rates of interest which are redetermined either daily, monthly, quarterly or semi-annually by reference to a base lending rate, plus a premium. These base lending rates are primarily the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and secondarily, the prime rate offered by one or more major United States banks (the “Prime Rate”) and the certificate of deposit (“CD”) rate or other base lending rates used by commercial lenders. |
|
(2) | | Represents a payment-in-kind security which may pay all or a portion of interest in additional par. |
|
(3) | | This Senior Loan will settle after December 31, 2010, at which time the interest rate will be determined. |
|
(4) | | Defaulted matured security. For a variable rate security, interest rate has been adjusted to reflect non-accrual status. |
�� |
(5) | | Security valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees. |
|
(6) | | Security was acquired in connection with a restructuring of a Senior Loan and may be subject to restrictions on resale. |
|
(7) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(8) | | Amount is less than 0.05%. |
See notes to financial statements14
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2010 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investments, at value (identified cost, $350,749,195) | | $ | 360,694,531 | | | |
Cash | | | 869 | | | |
Interest receivable | | | 936,596 | | | |
Receivable for investments sold | | | 1,296,940 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 229,209 | | | |
Prepaid expenses | | | 15,495 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 363,173,640 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 8,427,213 | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 112,393 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 170,045 | | | |
Distribution fees | | | 73,933 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 3,386 | | | |
Payable for shareholder servicing fees | | | 125,237 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 164,879 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 9,077,086 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 354,096,554 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 343,092,477 | | | |
Accumulated net realized gain | | | 603,291 | | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 455,450 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 9,945,336 | | | |
|
|
Total | | $ | 354,096,554 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share |
|
($354,096,554 ¸ 37,414,301 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 9.46 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
December 31, 2010 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Interest | | $ | 36,844,762 | | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 36,844,762 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 4,089,841 | | | |
Distribution fees | | | 1,802,041 | | | |
Shareholder servicing fees | | | 1,725,495 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 21,295 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 287,764 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 10,970 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 118,892 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 10,802 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 130,002 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 72,318 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 8,269,420 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 89 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 89 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 8,269,331 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 28,575,431 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | 12,258,899 | | | |
|
|
Net realized gain | | $ | 12,258,899 | | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | 29,744,272 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | 29,744,272 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain | | $ | 42,003,171 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 70,578,602 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements15
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | December 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 28,575,431 | | | $ | 45,980,610 | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions | | | 12,258,899 | | | | (8,346,239 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments | | | 29,744,272 | | | | 276,191,269 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 70,578,602 | | | $ | 313,825,640 | | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $ | (28,941,398 | ) | | $ | (45,879,882 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (28,941,398 | ) | | $ | (45,879,882 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | $ | 127,655,278 | | | $ | 361,633,950 | | | |
Net asset value of shares issued to shareholders in payment of distributions declared | | | 28,941,398 | | | | 45,798,432 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (1,076,346,164 | ) | | | (63,086,462 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | (919,749,488 | ) | | $ | 344,345,920 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | | $ | (878,112,284 | ) | | $ | 612,291,678 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 1,232,208,838 | | | $ | 619,917,160 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 354,096,554 | | | $ | 1,232,208,838 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 455,450 | | | $ | 569,999 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements16
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | 2007 | | | 2006 | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of year | | $ | 9.050 | | | $ | 6.580 | | | $ | 9.580 | | | $ | 10.040 | | | $ | 10.080 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income(1) | | $ | 0.369 | | | $ | 0.399 | | | $ | 0.501 | | | $ | 0.622 | | | $ | 0.602 | | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.442 | | | | 2.467 | | | | (3.006 | ) | | | (0.459 | ) | | | (0.062 | ) | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 0.811 | | | $ | 2.866 | | | $ | (2.505 | ) | | $ | 0.163 | | | $ | 0.540 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.401 | ) | | $ | (0.396 | ) | | $ | (0.495 | ) | | $ | (0.623 | ) | | $ | (0.580 | ) | | |
Tax return of capital | | | — | | | | — | | | | — | | | | (0.000 | )(2) | | | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.401 | ) | | $ | (0.396 | ) | | $ | (0.495 | ) | | $ | (0.623 | ) | | $ | (0.580 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of year | | $ | 9.460 | | | $ | 9.050 | | | $ | 6.580 | | | $ | 9.580 | | | $ | 10.040 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(3) | | | 9.12 | % | | | 44.29 | % | | | (27.17 | )% | | | 1.62 | % | | | 5.50 | % | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of year (000’s omitted) | | $ | 354,097 | | | $ | 1,232,209 | | | $ | 619,917 | | | $ | 705,291 | | | $ | 446,539 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.20 | % | | | 1.14 | % | | | 1.19 | % | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.15 | % | | | 1.19 | % | | | 1.12 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | |
Net investment income | | | 3.98 | % | | | 4.82 | % | | | 5.80 | % | | | 6.30 | % | | | 6.00 | % | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 35 | % | | | 26 | % | | | 16 | % | | | 45 | % | | | 38 | % | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(2) | | Amount is less than $0.001. |
|
(3) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
See notes to financial statements17
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Variable Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund’s investment objective is to provide a high level of current income. The Fund is generally made available for purchase only to separate accounts established by participating insurance companies and qualified pension or retirement plans.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A Investment Valuation — Interests in senior floating-rate loans (Senior Loans) for which reliable market quotations are readily available are valued generally at the average mean of bid and ask quotations obtained from a third party pricing service. Other Senior Loans are valued at fair value by the investment adviser under procedures approved by the Trustees. In fair valuing a Senior Loan, the investment adviser utilizes one or more of the valuation techniques described in (i) through (iii) below to assess the likelihood that the borrower will make a full repayment of the loan underlying such Senior Loan relative to yields on other Senior Loans issued by companies of comparable credit quality. If the investment adviser believes that there is a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using a matrix pricing approach that considers the yield on the Senior Loan. If the investment adviser believes there is not a reasonable likelihood of full repayment, the investment adviser will determine fair value using analyses that include, but are not limited to: (i) a comparison of the value of the borrower’s outstanding equity and debt to that of comparable public companies; (ii) a discounted cash flow analysis; or (iii) when the investment adviser believes it is likely that a borrower will be liquidated or sold, an analysis of the terms of such liquidation or sale. In certain cases, the investment adviser will use a combination of analytical methods to determine fair value, such as when only a portion of a borrower’s assets are likely to be sold. In conducting its assessment and analyses for purposes of determining fair value of a Senior Loan, the investment adviser will use its discretion and judgment in considering and appraising relevant factors. Fair value determinations are made by the portfolio managers of the Fund based on information available to such managers. The portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may not possess the same information about a Senior Loan borrower as the portfolio managers of the Fund. At times, the fair value of a Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of other funds managed by the investment adviser that invest in Senior Loans may vary from the fair value of the same Senior Loan determined by the portfolio managers of the Fund. The fair value of each Senior Loan is periodically reviewed and approved by the investment adviser’s Valuation Committee and by the Trustees based upon procedures approved by the Trustees. Junior Loans (i.e., subordinated loans and second lien loans) are valued in the same manner as Senior Loans.
Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term debt securities purchased with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.
Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale or closing price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Fund in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and
18
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount. Fees associated with loan amendments are recognized immediately.
D Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, a capital loss carryforward of $4,334,139 was utilized to offset net realized gains by the Fund.
As of December 31, 2010, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended December 31, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
F Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
G Unfunded Loan Commitments — The Fund may enter into certain credit agreements all or a portion of which may be unfunded. The Fund is obligated to fund these commitments at the borrower’s discretion. These commitments, if any, are disclosed in the accompanying Portfolio of Investments.
H Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
I Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Fund shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall assume the defense on behalf of any Fund shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Fund property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
The Fund declares dividends daily to shareholders of record at the time of declaration. Distributions are generally paid monthly. Distributions of realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any) are made at least annually. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the Fund at the net asset value as of the reinvestment date or, if an election is made on behalf of a separate account, to receive some or all of the distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital.
19
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 28,941,398 | | | $ | 45,879,882 | | | |
During the year ended December 31, 2010, accumulated net realized gain was decreased by $251,418 and accumulated undistributed net investment income was increased by $251,418 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for defaulted bond interest. These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of December 31, 2010, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 1,545,623 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 9,458,454 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales, premium amortization and defaulted bond interest.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.575% of the Fund’s average daily net assets up to $1 billion, 0.525% of average daily net assets from $1 billion but less than $2 billion, and at reduced rates on daily net assets of $2 billion or more, and is payable monthly. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the investment adviser fee amounted to $4,089,841 or 0.57% of the Fund’s average daily net assets. EVM also serves as administrator of the Fund, but receives no compensation. Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), the Fund’s principal underwriter and an affiliate of EVM, received distribution fees (see Note 4).
Except for Trustees of the Fund who are not members of EVM’s organization, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund are officers of EVM.
4 Distribution Plan
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The distribution plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution fee of 0.25% per annum of the Fund’s average daily net assets for the sale and distribution of Fund shares. Distribution fees for the year ended December 31, 2010 amounted to $1,802,041. Insurance companies receive such fees from EVD based on the value of shares held by such companies. The insurance companies through which investors hold shares of the Fund may also pay fees to third parties in connection with the sale of variable contracts and for services provided to variable contract owners. The Fund, EVM or EVD are not a party to these arrangements. Investors should consult the prospectus and statement of additional information for their variable contracts for a discussion of these payments. EVD may, at its expense, provide promotional incentives to dealers that sell variable insurance products.
5 Shareholder Servicing Plan
The Trust, on behalf of the Fund, has adopted a Shareholder Servicing Plan (Servicing Plan). The Servicing Plan allows the Trust to enter into shareholder servicing agreements with insurance companies, investment dealers, broker-dealers or other financial intermediaries that provide shareholder services relating to Fund shares and their shareholders, including variable contract owners or plan participants with interests in the Fund. Under the Servicing Plan, the Fund may make payments at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to its shares that are subject to shareholder servicing agreements. For the year ended December 31, 2010, shareholder servicing fees were equivalent to 0.24% of the Fund’s average daily net assets and amounted to $1,725,495.
6 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations and including maturities and principal repayments on Senior Loans, aggregated $220,295,071 and $1,128,940,269, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010. Included in sales are proceeds of $774,514,176 from the sale of securities by the Fund to investment companies advised or sub-advised by EVM or
20
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
its affiliates. Such transactions were executed in accordance with affiliated transaction procedures approved by the Fund’s Trustees.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund). Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | |
|
|
Sales | | | 13,754,788 | | | | 44,515,408 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 3,117,817 | | | | 5,507,944 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (115,590,646 | ) | | | (8,088,361 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase (decrease) | | | (98,718,041 | ) | | | 41,934,991 | | | |
|
|
At December 31, 2010, separate accounts of 2 insurance companies each owned more than 10% of the Fund’s shares outstanding aggregating 91%.
8 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Fund at December 31, 2010, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 351,236,077 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 14,760,359 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (5,301,905 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 9,458,454 | | | |
|
|
9 Line of Credit
The Fund participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Fund solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Fund based on its borrowings at a prime rate or an amount above either the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or the Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% (0.15% prior to March 22, 2010) on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. Because the line of credit is not available exclusively to the Fund, it may be unable to borrow some or all of its requested amounts at any particular time. Average borrowings and the average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $1,315,068 and 1.55%, respectively.
10 Credit Risk
The Fund invests primarily in below investment grade floating-rate loans and floating-rate debt obligations, which are considered speculative because of the credit risk of their issuers. Changes in economic conditions or other circumstances are more likely to reduce the capacity of issuers of these securities to make principal and interest payments. Such companies are more likely to default on their payments of interest and principal owed than issuers of investment grade bonds. An economic downturn generally leads to a higher non-payment rate, and a loan or other debt obligation may lose significant value before a default occurs. Lower rated investments also may be subject to greater price volatility than higher rated investments. Moreover, the specific collateral used to secure a loan may decline in value or become illiquid, which would adversely affect the loan’s value.
11 Fair Value Measurements
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At December 31, 2010, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing the Fund’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
21
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Senior Floating-Rate Interests | | $ | — | | | $ | 330,596,331 | | | $ | 1,776,313 | | | $ | 332,372,644 | | | |
Corporate Bonds & Notes | | | — | | | | 1,266,625 | | | | — | | | | 1,266,625 | | | |
Common Stocks | | | 319,825 | | | | 781,087 | | | | 3,988,435 | | | | 5,089,347 | | | |
Short-Term Investments | | | — | | | | 21,965,915 | | | | — | | | | 21,965,915 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 319,825 | | | $ | 354,609,958 | | | $ | 5,764,748 | | | $ | 360,694,531 | | | |
|
|
The following is a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Investments in
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Senior
| | | Investments in
| | | | | | |
| | Floating-Rate
| | | Common
| | | | | | |
| | Interests | | | Stocks | | | Total | | | |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 | | $ | 437,133 | | | $ | 8,244 | | | $ | 445,377 | | | |
Realized gains (losses) | | | (292,638 | ) | | | 789,250 | | | | 496,612 | | | |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)* | | | 233,290 | | | | 579,730 | | | | 813,020 | | | |
Cost of purchases | | | 1,676,867 | | | | 5,576,420 | | | | 7,253,287 | | | |
Proceeds from sales | | | (238,320 | ) | | | (3,080,000 | ) | | | (3,318,320 | ) | | |
Accrued discount (premium) | | | (31 | ) | | | — | | | | (31 | ) | | |
Transfers to Level 3** | | | 170,621 | | | | 114,791 | | | | 285,412 | | | |
Transfers from Level 3** | | | (210,609 | ) | | | — | | | | (210,609 | ) | | |
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2010 | | $ | 1,776,313 | | | $ | 3,988,435 | | | $ | 5,764,748 | | | |
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments still held as of December 31, 2010* | | $ | (59,141 | ) | | $ | 579,730 | | | $ | 520,589 | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Amount is included in the related amount on investments in the Statement of Operations. |
|
** | | Transfers are reflected at the value of the securities at the beginning of the period. Transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 were due to a reduction in the availability of significant observable inputs in determining the fair value of these investments. Transfers from Level 3 to Level 2 were due to increased market trading activity resulting in the availability of significant observable inputs in determining the fair value of these investments. At December 31, 2010, the value of investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2, if any, during the year then ended was not significant. |
22
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Variable Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Variable Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of December 31, 2010, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities and senior loans owned as of December 31, 2010, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and selling or agent banks; where replies were not received from brokers and selling or agent banks, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund as of December 31, 2010, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 16, 2011
23
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ CONTRACT APPROVAL
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 26, 2010, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board, which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held between February and April 2010. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund (including yield where relevant) to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of similarly managed funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | For each fund, comparative information concerning the fees charged and the services provided by each adviser in managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s policies and procedures relating to proxy voting, the handling of corporate actions and class actions; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
| • | A description of Eaton Vance Management’s procedures for overseeing third party advisers and sub-advisers; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
24
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ CONTRACT APPROVAL CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2010, with respect to one or more Funds, the Board met ten times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met nine, thirteen, three, eight and fifteen times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective including, where relevant, the use of derivative instruments, as well as trading policies and procedures and risk management techniques.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Fund. In particular, the Board evaluated the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing special considerations relevant to investing in and, where relevant, restructuring senior secured floating rate loans. Specifically, the Board noted the experience of the Adviser’s large group of bank loan investment professionals and other personnel who provide services to the Fund, including portfolio managers and analysts. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation methods of the Adviser to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests in recent years from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
25
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ CONTRACT APPROVAL CONT’D
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of comparable funds identified by an independent data provider as well as a peer group of similarly managed funds and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended September 30, 2009 for the Fund. The Board concluded that the performance of the Fund was satisfactory.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates payable by the Fund (referred to collectively as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2009, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board also considered factors that had an impact on Fund expense ratios, as identified by management in response to inquiries from the Contract Review Committee, as well as actions being taken to reduce expenses at the Eaton Vance fund complex level.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Fund and other investment advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
26
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Variable Trust (the Trust) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corporation, “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., and “OrbiMed” refers to OrbiMed Advisors LLC. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | in Fund Complex
| | | Other Directorships Held
|
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | During Past Five Years and
| | Overseen By
| | | During the Last
|
Year of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | Other Relevant Experience | | Trustee(1) | | | Five Years(2) |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 1958 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 175 registered investment companies and 1 private investment company managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust. | | | 175 | | | Director of EVC. |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1963 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 175 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 1940 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Private Investor and Consultant. Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 175 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 1947 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Chief Financial Officer, Aveon Group L.P. (an investment management firm) (since 2010). Formerly, Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (2006-2010). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, United Asset Management Corporation (an institutional investment management firm) (1982-2001). Formerly, Senior Manager, Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm) (1972-1981). | | | 175 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 1940 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. Formerly, Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) and Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy), U.S. Department of the Treasury (1983-1985). Formerly, Chief of Staff, Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Congress (1988-1990). | | | 175 | | | None |
27
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | in Fund Complex
| | | Other Directorships Held
|
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | During Past Five Years and
| | Overseen By
| | | During the Last
|
Year of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | Other Relevant Experience | | Trustee(1) | | | Five Years(2) |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 1948 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Formerly, Dean, Carroll School of Management, Boston College (2000-2002). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Fixed Income, Scudder Kemper Investments (investment management firm) (1998-1999). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Equity and Fixed Income, Colonial Management Associates (investment management firm) (1991-1998). | | | 175 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer). Formerly, Trustee of SPDR Index Shares Funds and SPDR Series Trust (exchange traded funds) (2000-2009). Formerly, Director of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (a bank for banks) (2007-2009). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 1957 | | Trustee | | Since 2000 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. Professor Stout teaches classes in corporate law and securities regulation and is the author of numerous academic and professional papers on these areas. | | | 175 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1943 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Investment Officer (1982-1992), Chief Financial Officer (1988-1990) and Director (1982-1992), New England Life. Formerly, Chairperson, New England Mutual Funds (1982-1992). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, State Street Management & Research (1992-2000). Formerly, Chairperson, State Street Research Mutual Funds (1992-2000). Formerly, Director, W.P. Carey, LLC (1998-2004) and First Pioneer Farm Credit Corp. (2002-2006). | | | 175 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Year of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 1957 | | President | | Since 2008 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 88 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Matthew F. Beaudry 1962 | | Vice President | | Since 2010 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2006. Previously, Senior Vice President, Alliance Bernstein Investment Research and Management (2000-2006). Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael Botthof 1967 | | Vice President | | Since 2011 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 9 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John D. Crowley 1971 | | Vice President | | Since 2010 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Samuel D. Isaly 1945 | | Vice President | | Since 2000 | | Managing Partner of OrbiMed. Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Stephen J. Kaszynski 1954 | | Vice President | | Since 2010 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2008. Previously, Managing Director and Head of U.S. Equities for Credit Suisse Asset Management, as well as the lead portfolio manager of a Credit Suisse fund (2004-2007). Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael R. Mach 1947 | | Vice President | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 28 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
28
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Year of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Scott H. Page 1959 | | Vice President | | Since 2000 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 9 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Craig P. Russ 1963 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 5 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Andrew N. Sveen 1961 | | Vice President | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 2 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 1957 | | Treasurer | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 175 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 1960 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 175 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 1953 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 175 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
|
(2) | | During their respective tenures, the Trustees also served as trustees of one or more of the following Eaton Vance funds (which operated in the years noted): Eaton Vance Credit Opportunities Fund (launched in 2005 and terminated in 2010); Eaton Vance Insured Florida Plus Municipal Bond Fund (launched in 2002 and terminated in 2009); and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Trust (launched in 1998 and terminated in 2009). |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
29
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser and Administrator of
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Principal Underwriter*
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Transfer Agent
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance VT Floating-Rate Income FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report is prepared for the general information of contract owners. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus or summary prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus or summary prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
IMPORTANT NOTICES
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (Privacy Policy) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| | |
| • | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
|
| • | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker/dealers. |
|
| • | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
|
| • | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Boston Management and Research, and Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. Our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial adviser/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such adviser’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures. For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders.
Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial adviser, otherwise. If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial adviser. Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial adviser.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12 month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122. This description is also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
Economic and Market Conditions
Portfolio Management Team Back row: Michael Mach, Lead Portfolio Manager, Stephen J. Kaszynski. Front row: John D. Crowley, Matthew F. Beaudry
• | | U.S. stocks finished 2010 with solid double-digit returns for the major market indices, despite the lingering effects of the Great Recession. The year overall was bracketed by solid quarters at both ends of the period, with some weakness in the middle. The weakness came as a variety of concerns — including a stubborn European credit crisis, a devastating oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and growing political uncertainties in the U.S. — caused a spike in volatility at midyear, taking many markets down. |
|
• | | The year ended on a decidedly higher note, however, as equity investors seemed encouraged by the continued modest growth of the U.S. economy and by ongoing signs of improvements in corporate business fundamentals. Investment flows started to favor equities over bonds as longer-term interest rates began to rise toward year-end. |
|
• | | The broad-based S&P 500 Index was up 15.06% for the year ended December 31, 2010, while the blue-chip Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 14.06% and the technology-heavy NASDAQ Composite Index rose 18.16%. Growth indices outperformed value indices across all market capitalizations for the year. Meanwhile, small-cap and mid-cap stocks outperformed their larger-cap counterparts by wide margins, although all of the corresponding indices were firmly anchored in positive territory. |
Management Discussion
• | | The Fund returned 15.44% for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010.1 The Fund’s increase was nearly identical to that of its benchmark—the Russell 1000 Value Index (the Index)2 —which gained 15.51%. All 10 economic sectors of the Index ended the year in positive territory, while the Fund was positive in eight of the 10 sectors, with modest losses in health care (-2.47%) and information technology (-0.06%). |
|
• | | On a sector basis, underweighting utilities made the largest contribution to Fund results relative to the Index. The performance of the sector trailed the benchmark’s overall return; thus, having less exposure to utilities worked to the Fund’s advantage. Stock selection in the sector also was favorable relative to the Index, which further boosted the Fund’s comparative showing. |
|
• | | Security selection and an overweighting in materials were solid contributors as well. The materials sector was one of the best-performing market categories in 2010. As such, the Fund’s overweighted positioning paid off relative to its benchmark. Within the sector, the Fund had positive results in the metals & mining industry. On a relative basis, the Fund’s best- performing security overall—a position in one of the world’s largest producers of copper and gold—was from the metals & mining category. |
Total Return Performance
12/31/09 — 12/31/10
| | | | |
|
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund3 | | | 15.44 | % |
Russell 1000 Value Index2 | | | 15.51 | |
See page 3 for more performance information.
| | |
1 | | A large redemption from the Fund on 9/30/10 positively impacted Fund performance for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010. |
|
2 | | It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. |
|
3 | | The Fund has no sales charge. Insurance-related charges are not included in the calculation of returns. Such expenses would reduce the overall return shown. Please refer to the report for your insurance contract for performance data reflecting insurance-related charges. Absent an allocation of certain expenses to the investment adviser, the return would be lower. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
1
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION OF FUND PERFORMANCE
• | | On the downside, the biggest disappointment was the performance of Fund holdings in the energy sector, which were hurt by the Gulf oil disaster. Overall, three of the Fund’s 10 worst-performing stocks for the year were from the energy sector. Information technology was another detractor, as both sector and stock selection were negative, particularly the latter. |
|
• | | For most of 2010, stocks were highly correlated—meaning the majority rose or fell in sync with macroeconomic factors. However, that correlation fell sharply in the fourth quarter. The decline suggested that company-specific factors, rather than macroeconomic conditions, were driving stock returns. |
|
• | | Regardless of which direction the market takes, we remain committed to investing in companies we feel have strong business franchises and attractive growth prospects. We intend to invest in such companies only when they are available at what we regard as discounted valuations versus the broad market averages and our analysts’ estimates of fair market value. |
|
• | | We thank you for your continued confidence and participation in the Fund. |
Top 10 Holdings1,3
By net assets
| | | | |
|
Wells Fargo & Co. | | | 0.2 | % |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | | | 0.2 | |
ConocoPhillips | | | 0.2 | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | | 0.2 | |
Apache Corp. | | | 0.1 | |
Pfizer, Inc. | | | 0.1 | |
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | | | 0.1 | |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | | | 0.1 | |
Johnson & Johnson | | | 0.1 | |
Nestle SA | | | 0.1 | |
| | |
1 | | Top 10 Holdings represented 1.40% of the Fund’s net assets as of 12/31/10. Excludes cash equivalents. |
Sector Weightings2,3
By net assets
| | |
2 | | As a percentage of the Fund’s net assets as of 12/31/10. Excludes cash equivalents. |
|
3 | | Total investments represented 5.8% of the Fund’s net assets as of 12/31/10 as a result of a large share subscription on 12/31/10, the proceeds from which were invested subsequent to year end. |
The views expressed throughout this report are those of the portfolio managers and are current only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. These views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions, and the investment adviser disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a fund are based on many factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Eaton Vance fund. Portfolio information provided in the report may not be representative of the Fund’s current or future investments and may change due to active management.
2
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
FUND PERFORMANCE
The line graph and table set forth below provide information about the Fund’s performance. The line graph compares the performance of the Fund with that of the Russell 1000 Value Index, an unmanaged index of 1,000 U.S. large-cap value stocks. The lines on the graph represent the total returns of a hypothetical investment of $10,000 in each of the Fund and the Russell 1000 Value Index. The table includes the total return of the Fund at net asset value. There is no sales charge. The performance presented below does not reflect the deduction of insurance-related charges or taxes, if any, that a shareholder would pay on distributions or redemptions of Fund shares. Please refer to the report for your insurance contract for performance data reflecting insurance-related charges.
Performance1
Average Annual Total Returns (at net asset value) | | | | |
|
One Year | | | 15.44 | % |
Life of Fund† | | | -1.53 | |
† lnception Date: 3/30/07
| | |
1 | | The Fund has no sales charge. Insurance-related charges are not included in the calculation of returns. Such expenses would reduce the overall returns shown. Absent an allocation of certain expenses to the investment adviser, the returns would be lower. |
Total Annual
Operating Expenses2
| | | | |
|
Gross Expense Ratio | | | 1.66 | % |
Net Expense Ratio | | | 1.30 | |
| | |
2 | | Source: Prospectus dated 5/1/10. Net Expense Ratio reflects a contractual expense reimbursement that continues through April 30, 2011. Thereafter, the expense reimbursement may be changed or terminated subject to Trustee approval. Without this expense reimbursement, performance would have been lower. |
|
* | | Source: Lipper Inc. Investment operations commenced on 3/30/07. |
|
| | The graph does not reflect the deduction of insurance-related charges or taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. It is not possible to invest directly in an Index. The Index’s total return does not reflect any commissions or expenses that would have been incurred if an investor individually purchased or sold the securities represented in the Index. Index performance is available as of month end only. |
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that shares, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, the Fund’s current performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
3
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
FUND EXPENSES
Example: As a shareholder of the Fund, you incur ongoing costs, including management fees; distribution or service fees; and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2010 – December 31, 2010).
Actual Expenses: The first section of the table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this section, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes: The second section of the table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the actual Fund expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year (before expenses), which is not the actual return of the Fund. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in your Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds.
Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect expenses and charges which are, or may be imposed under the variable annuity contract or variable life insurance policy (variable contracts) (if applicable) through which your investment in the Fund is made. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs associated with an investment in vehicles which fund benefits under variable contracts and to qualified pension and retirement plans, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of investing in the Fund through variable contracts. In addition, if these expenses and charges imposed under the variable contracts were included, your costs would have been higher.
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Beginning Account Value
| | | Ending Account Value
| | | Expenses Paid During Period
| | | |
| | (7/1/10) | | | (12/31/10) | | | (7/1/10 – 12/31/10)* | | | |
|
|
Actual | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,266.50 | | | | $8.06 | ** | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hypothetical | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(5% return per year before expenses) | | | $1,000.00 | | | | $1,018.10 | | | | $7.17 | ** | | |
| | | |
| * | Expenses are equal to the Fund’s annualized expense ratio of 1.41% multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 184/365 (to reflect the one-half year period). The Example assumes that $1,000 was invested at the net asset value per share determined at the close of business on June 30, 2010. Expenses shown do not include insurance-related charges. | |
|
| ** | Absent an allocation of certain expenses to an affiliate, expenses would be higher. | |
4
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS
| | | | | | | | | | |
Common Stocks — 5.8% |
|
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense — 0.2% |
|
Boeing Co. (The) | | | 377 | | | $ | 24,603 | | | |
General Dynamics Corp. | | | 817 | | | | 57,974 | | | |
United Technologies Corp. | | | 754 | | | | 59,355 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 141,932 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Beverages — 0.1% |
|
PepsiCo, Inc. | | | 692 | | | $ | 45,208 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 45,208 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Biotechnology — 0.1% |
|
Amgen, Inc.(1) | | | 1,044 | | | $ | 57,316 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 57,316 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets — 0.2% |
|
Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) | | | 528 | | | $ | 88,789 | | | |
Northern Trust Corp. | | | 503 | | | | 27,871 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 116,660 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Chemicals — 0.0%(2) |
|
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. | | | 314 | | | $ | 28,558 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 28,558 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks — 0.5% |
|
Fifth Third Bancorp | | | 3,332 | | | $ | 48,914 | | | |
KeyCorp | | | 5,029 | | | | 44,507 | | | |
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | | | 1,642 | | | | 99,702 | | | |
U.S. Bancorp | | | 2,691 | | | | 72,576 | | | |
Wells Fargo & Co. | | | 4,275 | | | | 132,482 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 398,181 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies — 0.0%(2) |
|
Waste Management, Inc. | | | 855 | | | $ | 31,524 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 31,524 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Communications Equipment — 0.1% |
|
Cisco Systems, Inc.(1) | | | 2,146 | | | $ | 43,414 | | | |
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Class B ADR | | | 1,895 | | | | 21,849 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 65,263 | | | |
|
|
|
Computers & Peripherals — 0.1% |
|
Hewlett-Packard Co. | | | 1,132 | | | $ | 47,657 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 47,657 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance — 0.1% |
|
American Express Co. | | | 1,006 | | | $ | 43,178 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 43,178 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services — 0.3% |
|
Bank of America Corp. | | | 6,751 | | | $ | 90,058 | | | |
Citigroup, Inc.(1) | | | 7,688 | | | | 36,364 | | | |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | | | 2,640 | | | | 111,989 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 238,411 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication Services — 0.1% |
|
AT&T, Inc. | | | 1,697 | | | $ | 49,858 | | | |
Verizon Communications, Inc. | | | 1,446 | | | | 51,738 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 101,596 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities — 0.1% |
|
American Electric Power Co., Inc. | | | 1,760 | | | $ | 63,325 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 63,325 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food & Staples Retailing — 0.2% |
|
CVS Caremark Corp. | | | 1,446 | | | $ | 50,278 | | | |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | | | 1,823 | | | | 98,314 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 148,592 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Food Products — 0.2% |
|
Kellogg Co. | | | 460 | | | $ | 23,497 | | | |
Kraft Foods, Inc., Class A | | | 1,132 | | | | 35,669 | | | |
Nestle SA | | | 1,603 | | | | 93,910 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 153,076 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Equipment & Supplies — 0.1% |
|
Covidien PLC | | | 1,006 | | | $ | 45,934 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 45,934 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers & Services — 0.1% |
|
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | | | 1,201 | | | $ | 43,368 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 43,368 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements5
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure — 0.2% |
|
Carnival Corp. | | | 817 | | | $ | 37,672 | | | |
McDonald’s Corp. | | | 1,010 | | | | 77,528 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 115,200 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Household Products — 0.0%(2) |
|
Kimberly-Clark Corp. | | | 373 | | | $ | 23,514 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 23,514 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Industrial Conglomerates — 0.2% |
|
General Electric Co. | | | 4,652 | | | $ | 85,085 | | | |
Tyco International, Ltd. | | | 692 | | | | 28,677 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 113,762 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance — 0.3% |
|
Lincoln National Corp. | | | 1,572 | | | $ | 43,717 | | | |
MetLife, Inc. | | | 1,886 | | | | 83,814 | | | |
Prudential Financial, Inc. | | | 1,509 | | | | 88,593 | | | |
Travelers Companies, Inc. (The) | | | 440 | | | | 24,513 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 240,637 | | | |
|
|
|
|
IT Services — 0.1% |
|
Accenture PLC, Class A | | | 503 | | | $ | 24,391 | | | |
International Business Machines Corp. | | | 295 | | | | 43,294 | | | |
MasterCard, Inc., Class A | | | 128 | | | | 28,686 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 96,371 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Life Sciences Tools & Services — 0.0%(2) |
|
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.(1) | | | 503 | | | $ | 27,846 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 27,846 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Machinery — 0.1% |
|
Caterpillar, Inc. | | | 377 | | | $ | 35,310 | | | |
PACCAR, Inc. | | | 499 | | | | 28,652 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 63,962 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Media — 0.1% |
|
Time Warner Cable, Inc. | | | 503 | | | $ | 33,213 | | | |
Walt Disney Co. (The) | | | 855 | | | | 32,071 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 65,284 | | | |
|
|
|
Metals & Mining — 0.2% |
|
BHP Billiton, Ltd. ADR | | | 679 | | | $ | 63,093 | | | |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc. | | | 591 | | | | 70,973 | | | |
United States Steel Corp. | | | 568 | | | | 33,183 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 167,249 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multi-Utilities — 0.2% |
|
PG&E Corp. | | | 1,006 | | | $ | 48,127 | | | |
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. | | | 1,446 | | | | 45,997 | | | |
Sempra Energy | | | 943 | | | | 49,489 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 143,613 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Multiline Retail — 0.1% |
|
Target Corp. | | | 817 | | | $ | 49,126 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 49,126 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels — 0.8% |
|
Apache Corp. | | | 880 | | | $ | 104,922 | | | |
ConocoPhillips | | | 1,697 | | | | 115,566 | | | |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | | | 1,207 | | | | 88,256 | | | |
Hess Corp. | | | 1,182 | | | | 90,470 | | | |
Occidental Petroleum Corp. | | | 1,182 | | | | 115,954 | | | |
Peabody Energy Corp. | | | 1,358 | | | | 86,885 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 602,053 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals — 0.5% |
|
Abbott Laboratories | | | 1,635 | | | $ | 78,333 | | | |
Johnson & Johnson | | | 1,578 | | | | 97,599 | | | |
Merck & Co., Inc. | | | 2,488 | | | | 89,667 | | | |
Pfizer, Inc. | | | 5,909 | | | | 103,467 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 369,066 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) — 0.1% |
|
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. | | | 354 | | | $ | 39,843 | | | |
Boston Properties, Inc. | | | 314 | | | | 27,035 | | | |
Vornado Realty Trust | | | 440 | | | | 36,665 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 103,543 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Road & Rail — 0.1% |
|
Union Pacific Corp. | | | 758 | | | $ | 70,236 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 70,236 | | | |
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements6
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
Security | | Shares | | | Value | | | |
|
|
|
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment — 0.0%(2) |
|
Intel Corp. | | | 1,069 | | | $ | 22,481 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 22,481 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Software — 0.1% |
|
Microsoft Corp. | | | 1,760 | | | $ | 49,139 | | | |
Oracle Corp. | | | 880 | | | | 27,544 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 76,683 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Specialty Retail — 0.1% |
|
Best Buy Co., Inc. | | | 880 | | | $ | 30,175 | | | |
Staples, Inc. | | | 1,137 | | | | 25,890 | | | |
TJX Companies, Inc. (The) | | | 1,073 | | | | 47,630 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 103,695 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Tobacco — 0.0%(2) |
|
Philip Morris International, Inc. | | | 357 | | | $ | 20,895 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 20,895 | | | |
|
|
|
|
Wireless Telecommunication Services — 0.1% |
|
Rogers Communications, Inc., Class B | | | 1,383 | | | $ | 47,893 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | $ | 47,893 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Common Stocks | | |
(identified cost $3,320,730) | | $ | 4,292,888 | | | |
|
|
| | |
Total Investments — 5.8% | | |
(identified cost $3,320,730) | | $ | 4,292,888 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Other Assets, Less Liabilities — 94.2% | | $ | 70,116,237 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net Assets — 100.0% | | $ | 74,409,125 | | | |
|
|
The percentage shown for each investment category in the Portfolio of Investments is based on net assets.
ADR - American Depositary Receipt
| | |
(1) | | Non-income producing security. |
|
(2) | | Amount is less than 0.05%. |
On December 31, 2010, a separate account shareholder purchased shares of the Fund approximating $70,100,000. The subscription was paid in cash and the proceeds were invested subsequent to year end.
See notes to financial statements7
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
| | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2010 | | | | | |
|
Assets |
|
Investments, at value (identified cost, $3,320,730) | | $ | 4,292,888 | | | |
Cash | | | 46,068 | | | |
Dividends receivable | | | 6,620 | | | |
Receivable for Fund shares sold | | | 70,126,385 | | | |
Tax reclaims receivable | | | 11,919 | | | |
Receivable from affiliate | | | 2,800 | | | |
|
|
Total assets | | $ | 74,486,680 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Liabilities |
|
Payable for investments purchased | | $ | 5,036 | | | |
Payable for Fund shares redeemed | | | 24 | | | |
Payable to affiliates: | | | | | | |
Investment adviser fee | | | 2,236 | | | |
Distribution fees | | | 895 | | | |
Trustees’ fees | | | 495 | | | |
Payable for shareholder servicing fees | | | 1,818 | | | |
Accrued expenses | | | 67,051 | | | |
|
|
Total liabilities | | $ | 77,555 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 74,409,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Sources of Net Assets |
|
Paid-in capital | | $ | 77,980,052 | | | |
Accumulated net realized loss | | | (4,556,438 | ) | | |
Accumulated undistributed net investment income | | | 11,877 | | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | | 973,634 | | | |
|
|
Net Assets | | $ | 74,409,125 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Net Asset Value, Offering Price and Redemption Price Per Share |
|
($74,409,125 ¸ 8,484,536 shares of beneficial interest outstanding) | | $ | 8.77 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
For the Year Ended
| | | | | |
December 31, 2010 | | | | | |
|
Investment Income |
|
Dividends (net of foreign taxes, $6,965) | | $ | 708,084 | | | |
|
|
Total investment income | | $ | 708,084 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Expenses |
|
Investment adviser fee | | $ | 218,345 | | | |
Distribution fees | | | 87,338 | | | |
Shareholder servicing fees | | | 71,749 | | | |
Trustees’ fees and expenses | | | 2,089 | | | |
Custodian fee | | | 40,822 | | | |
Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees | | | 11,995 | | | |
Legal and accounting services | | | 43,025 | | | |
Printing and postage | | | 5,575 | | | |
Registration fees | | | 1,714 | | | |
Interest expense and fees | | | 13,265 | | | |
Miscellaneous | | | 4,135 | | | |
|
|
Total expenses | | $ | 500,052 | | | |
|
|
Deduct — | | | | | | |
Reduction of custodian fee | | $ | 605 | | | |
Allocation of expenses to affiliate | | | 33,792 | | | |
|
|
Total expense reductions | | $ | 34,397 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net expenses | | $ | 465,655 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 242,429 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
|
Net realized gain (loss) — | | | | | | |
Investment transactions | | $ | 4,429,207 | | | |
Foreign currency transactions | | | (492 | ) | | |
|
|
Net realized gain | | $ | 4,428,715 | | | |
|
|
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — | | | | | | |
Investments | | $ | (4,443,081 | ) | | |
Foreign currency | | | 1,301 | | | |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | | $ | (4,441,780 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net realized and unrealized loss | | $ | (13,065 | ) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 229,364 | | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements8
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| | | | | | | | | | |
Increase (Decrease)
| | Year Ended
| | | Year Ended
| | | |
in Net Assets | | December 31, 2010 | | | December 31, 2009 | | | |
|
From operations — | | | | | | | | | | |
Net investment income | | $ | 242,429 | | | $ | 258,996 | | | |
Net realized gain (loss) from investment and foreign currency transactions and capital gain distributions received | | | 4,428,715 | | | | (3,816,244 | ) | | |
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and foreign currency | | | (4,441,780 | ) | | | 9,868,129 | | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from operations | | $ | 229,364 | | | $ | 6,310,881 | | | |
|
|
Distributions to shareholders — | | | | | | | | | | |
From net investment income | | $ | (229,107 | ) | | $ | (261,969 | ) | | |
|
|
Total distributions to shareholders | | $ | (229,107 | ) | | $ | (261,969 | ) | | |
|
|
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest — | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from sale of shares | | $ | 76,972,560 | | | $ | 25,538,240 | | | |
Reinvestment of distributions | | | 205,837 | | | | 253,823 | | | |
Cost of shares redeemed | | | (47,530,674 | ) | | | (1,665,232 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase in net assets from Fund share transactions | | $ | 29,647,723 | | | $ | 24,126,831 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Net increase in net assets | | $ | 29,647,980 | | | $ | 30,175,743 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Net Assets |
|
At beginning of year | | $ | 44,761,145 | | | $ | 14,585,402 | | | |
|
|
At end of year | | $ | 74,409,125 | | | $ | 44,761,145 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Accumulated undistributed (distributions in excess of) net investment income included in net assets |
|
At end of year | | $ | 11,877 | | | $ | (6,056 | ) | | |
|
|
See notes to financial statements9
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
Financial Highlights
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | | | | |
| | | | | Period Ended
| | | |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | 2008 | | | December 31, 2007(1) | | | |
|
Net asset value — Beginning of period | | $ | 8.000 | | | $ | 6.820 | | | $ | 10.630 | | | $ | 10.000 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Income (Loss) From Operations |
|
Net investment income | | $ | 0.467 | | | $ | 0.074 | (2) | | $ | 0.105 | (2) | | $ | 0.072 | (2) | | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | | | 0.768 | (3) | | | 1.158 | | | | (3.812 | ) | | | 0.558 | | | |
|
|
Total income (loss) from operations | | $ | 1.235 | | | $ | 1.232 | | | $ | (3.707 | ) | | $ | 0.630 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Less Distributions |
|
From net investment income | | $ | (0.465 | ) | | $ | (0.052 | ) | | $ | (0.103 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
Total distributions | | $ | (0.465 | ) | | $ | (0.052 | ) | | $ | (0.103 | ) | | $ | — | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Net asset value — End of period | | $ | 8.770 | | | $ | 8.000 | | | $ | 6.820 | | | $ | 10.630 | | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Return(4) | | | 15.44 | % | | | 18.25 | % | | | (34.96 | )% | | | 6.30 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
|
Net assets, end of period (000’s omitted) | | $ | 74,409 | | | $ | 44,761 | | | $ | 14,585 | | | $ | 22,695 | | | |
Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Expenses before custodian fee reduction(6) | | | 1.34 | %(7) | | | 1.30 | % | | | 1.30 | % | | | 1.30 | %(8) | | |
Expenses after custodian fee reduction(6) | | | 1.34 | %(7) | | | 1.30 | % | | | 1.30 | % | | | 1.29 | %(8) | | |
Net investment income | | | 0.70 | % | | | 1.04 | % | | | 1.16 | % | | | 0.90 | %(8) | | |
Portfolio Turnover | | | 55 | % | | | 71 | % | | | 86 | % | | | 42 | %(5) | | |
|
|
| | |
(1) | | For the period from the start of business, March 30, 2007, to December 31, 2007. |
|
(2) | | Computed using average shares outstanding. |
|
(3) | | The per share amount is not in accord with the net realized and unrealized gain (loss) on investments for the period because of the timing of sales of Fund shares and the amount of the per share realized and unrealized gains and losses at such time. |
|
(4) | | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value with all distributions reinvested. |
|
(5) | | Not annualized. |
|
(6) | | The investment adviser subsidized certain operating expenses (equal to 0.10%, 0.31%, 0.32% and 12.96% of average daily net assets for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and the period ended December 31, 2007, respectively). Absent this subsidy, total return would be lower. |
|
(7) | | Includes interest expense of 0.04%. |
|
(8) | | Annualized. |
See notes to financial statements10
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund (the Fund) is a diversified series of Eaton Vance Variable Trust (the Trust). The Trust is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. The Fund’s investment objective is to seek total return. The Fund is generally made available for purchase only to separate accounts established by participating insurance companies and qualified pension or retirement plans.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Fund. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A Investment Valuation — Equity securities (including common shares of closed-end investment companies) listed on a U.S. securities exchange generally are valued at the last sale or closing price on the day of valuation or, if no sales took place on such date, at the mean between the closing bid and asked prices therefore on the exchange where such securities are principally traded. Equity securities listed on the NASDAQ Global or Global Select Market generally are valued at the NASDAQ official closing price. Unlisted or listed securities for which closing sales prices or closing quotations are not available are valued at the mean between the latest available bid and asked prices or, in the case of preferred equity securities that are not listed or traded in the over-the-counter market, by a third party pricing service that will use various techniques that consider factors including, but not limited to, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, quotes of underlying common stock, issuer spreads, as well as industry and economic events. Short-term debt securities purchased with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. Foreign securities and currencies are valued in U.S. dollars, based on foreign currency exchange rate quotations supplied by a third party pricing service. The pricing service uses a proprietary model to determine the exchange rate. Inputs to the model include reported trades and implied bid/ask spreads. The daily valuation of exchange-traded foreign securities generally is determined as of the close of trading on the principal exchange on which such securities trade. Events occurring after the close of trading on foreign exchanges may result in adjustments to the valuation of foreign securities to more accurately reflect their fair value as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange. When valuing foreign equity securities that meet certain criteria, the Trustees have approved the use of a fair value service that values such securities to reflect market trading that occurs after the close of the applicable foreign markets of comparable securities or other instruments that have a strong correlation to the fair-valued securities. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Fund in a manner that most fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Fund might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of all relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable companies or entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker-dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the company’s or entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost.
C Income — Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date for dividends received in cash and/or securities. However, if the ex-dividend date has passed, certain dividends from foreign securities are recorded as the Fund is informed of the ex-dividend date. Withholding taxes on foreign dividends and capital gains have been provided for in accordance with the Fund’s understanding of the applicable countries’ tax rules and rates. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
D Federal Taxes — The Fund’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary.
At December 31, 2010, the Fund, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $4,451,007 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Fund
11
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on December 31, 2016 ($53,050) and December 31, 2017 ($4,397,957). In addition, such capital loss carryforward cannot be utilized prior to the utilization of new capital loss carryovers, if any, created after December 31, 2010.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, a capital loss carryforward of $4,018,264 was utilized to offset net realized gains by the Fund.
As of December 31, 2010, the Fund had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. Each of the Fund’s federal tax returns filed in the 3-year period ended December 31, 2010 remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
E Expenses — The majority of expenses of the Trust are directly identifiable to an individual fund. Expenses which are not readily identifiable to a specific fund are allocated taking into consideration, among other things, the nature and type of expense and the relative size of the funds.
F Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Fund. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Fund maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Fund’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
G Foreign Currency Translation — Investment valuations, other assets, and liabilities initially expressed in foreign currencies are translated each business day into U.S. dollars based upon current exchange rates. Purchases and sales of foreign investment securities and income and expenses denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon currency exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of such transactions. Recognized gains or losses on investment transactions attributable to changes in foreign currency exchange rates are recorded for financial statement purposes as net realized gains and losses on investments. That portion of unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed.
H Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
I Indemnifications — Under the Fund’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Fund’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Fund shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall assume the defense on behalf of any Fund shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Fund property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred.
2 Distributions to Shareholders
It is the present policy of the Fund to make at least one distribution annually (normally in December) of all or substantially all of its net investment income and to distribute annually all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Shareholders may reinvest income and capital gain distributions in additional shares of the Fund at the net asset value as of the ex-dividend date or, if an election is made on behalf of a separate account, to receive some or all of the distributions in cash. The Fund distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
The tax character of distributions declared for the years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
12
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | |
|
|
Distributions declared from: | | | | | | | | | | |
Ordinary income | | $ | 229,107 | | | $ | 261,969 | | | |
During the year ended December 31, 2010, accumulated net realized loss was increased by $158, accumulated undistributed net investment income was increased by $4,611 and paid-in capital was decreased by $4,453 due to differences between book and tax accounting, primarily for foreign currency gain (loss) and distributions from real estate investment trusts (REITs). These reclassifications had no effect on the net assets or net asset value per share of the Fund.
As of December 31, 2010, the components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on a tax basis were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Undistributed ordinary income | | $ | 11,764 | | | |
Capital loss carryforward | | $ | (4,451,007 | ) | | |
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 868,316 | | | |
The differences between components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax basis and the amounts reflected in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities are primarily due to wash sales and distributions from REITs.
3 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for management and investment advisory services rendered to the Fund. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.625% of the Fund’s average daily net assets up to $2 billion and at reduced rates on daily net assets of $2 billion or more, and is payable monthly. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the investment adviser fee amounted to $218,345. EVM has agreed to reimburse the Fund’s operating expenses (relating to ordinary operating expenses only) to the extent that they exceed 1.30% annually of the Fund’s average daily net assets. This agreement may be changed or terminated after April 30, 2011. Pursuant to this agreement, EVM was allocated $33,792 of the Fund’s operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010. EVM also serves as administrator of the Fund, but receives no compensation. Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. (EVD), the Fund’s principal underwriter and an affiliate of EVM, received distribution fees (see Note 4).
Except for Trustees of the Fund who are not members of EVM’s organization, officers and Trustees receive remuneration for their services to the Fund out of the investment adviser fee. Certain officers and Trustees of the Fund are officers of EVM.
4 Distribution Plan
The Fund has in effect a distribution plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act. The distribution plan provides that the Fund will pay EVD a distribution fee of 0.25% per annum of the Fund’s average daily net assets for the sale and distribution of Fund shares. Distribution fees for the year ended December 31, 2010 amounted to $87,338. Insurance companies receive such fees from EVD based on the value of shares held by such companies. The insurance companies through which investors hold shares of the Fund may also pay fees to third parties in connection with the sale of variable contracts and for services provided to variable contract owners. The Fund, EVM or EVD are not a party to these arrangements. Investors should consult the prospectus and statement of additional information for their variable contracts for a discussion of these payments. EVD may, at its expense, provide promotional incentives to dealers that sell variable insurance products.
5 Shareholder Servicing Plan
The Trust, on behalf of the Fund, has adopted a Shareholder Servicing Plan (Servicing Plan). The Servicing Plan allows the Trust to enter into shareholder servicing agreements with insurance companies, investment dealers, broker-dealers or other financial intermediaries that provide shareholder services relating to Fund shares and their shareholders, including variable contract owners or plan participants with interests in the Fund. Under the Servicing Plan, the Fund may make payments at an annual rate of up to 0.25% of the Fund’s average daily net assets attributable to its shares that are subject to shareholder servicing agreements. No shareholder servicing fees are levied on shares owned by EVM, its affiliates, or their respective employees or clients and may be waived under certain other limited conditions. For the year ended December 31, 2010, shareholder servicing fees were equivalent to 0.21% of the Fund’s average daily net assets and amounted to $71,749.
6 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $18,976,592 and $55,908,101, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2010.
7 Shares of Beneficial Interest
The Fund’s Declaration of Trust permits the Trustees to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest (without par value). Such shares may be issued in a number of different series (such as the Fund). Transactions in Fund shares were as follows:
13
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2010 | | | 2009 | | | |
|
Sales | | | 8,850,637 | | | | 3,652,396 | | | |
Issued to shareholders electing to receive payments of distributions in Fund shares | | | 23,519 | | | | 31,453 | | | |
Redemptions | | | (5,986,824 | ) | | | (226,754 | ) | | |
|
|
Net increase | | | 2,887,332 | | | | 3,457,095 | | | |
|
|
At December 31, 2010, a separate account of an insurance company owned 99% of the outstanding shares of the Fund.
8 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Fund at December 31, 2010, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| | | | | | |
Aggregate cost | | $ | 3,426,048 | | | |
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation | | $ | 867,315 | | | |
Gross unrealized depreciation | | | (475 | ) | | |
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation | | $ | 866,840 | | | |
|
|
9 Line of Credit
The Fund participates with other portfolios and funds managed by EVM and its affiliates in a $450 million unsecured line of credit agreement with a group of banks. Borrowings are made by the Fund solely to facilitate the handling of unusual and/or unanticipated short-term cash requirements. Interest is charged to the Fund based on its borrowings at an amount above either the Eurodollar rate or Federal Funds rate. In addition, a fee computed at an annual rate of 0.10% on the daily unused portion of the line of credit is allocated among the participating portfolios and funds at the end of each quarter. Because the line of credit is not available exclusively to the Fund, it may be unable to borrow some or all of its requested amounts at any particular time. Average borrowings and the average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 were $582,974 and 2.20%, respectively.
10 Fair Value Measurements
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| | |
| • | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
|
| • | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
|
| • | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At December 31, 2010, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing the Fund’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quoted
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Prices in
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Active
| | | Significant
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Markets for
| | | Other
| | | Significant
| | | | | | |
| | Identical
| | | Observable
| | | Unobservable
| | | | | | |
| | Assets | | | Inputs | | | Inputs | | | | | | |
| | |
Asset Description | | (Level 1) | | | (Level 2) | | | (Level 3) | | | Total | | | |
|
Common Stocks | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Consumer Discretionary | | $ | 333,305 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 333,305 | | | |
Consumer Staples | | | 297,375 | | | | 93,910 | | | | — | | | | 391,285 | | | |
Energy | | | 602,053 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 602,053 | | | |
Financials | | | 1,140,610 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 1,140,610 | | | |
Health Care | | | 543,530 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 543,530 | | | |
Industrials | | | 421,416 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 421,416 | | | |
Information Technology | | | 308,455 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 308,455 | | | |
Materials | | | 195,807 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 195,807 | | | |
Telecommunication Services | | | 149,489 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 149,489 | | | |
Utilities | | | 206,938 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 206,938 | | | |
|
|
Total Common Stocks | | $ | 4,198,978 | | | $ | 93,910 | * | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,292,888 | | | |
|
|
Total Investments | | $ | 4,198,978 | | | $ | 93,910 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 4,292,888 | | | |
|
|
| | |
* | | Includes foreign equity securities whose values were adjusted to reflect market trading of comparable securities or other correlated instruments that occurred after the close of trading in their applicable foreign markets. |
The Fund held no investments or other financial instruments as of December 31, 2009 whose fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs. At December 31, 2010, the value of investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2, if any, during the year then ended was not significant.
14
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Trustees of Eaton Vance Variable Trust and Shareholders of Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund (the “Fund”) (one of the funds constituting Eaton Vance Variable Trust), including the portfolio of investments, as of December 31, 2010, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, March 30, 2007, to December 31, 2007. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2010, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers; where replies were not received from brokers, we performed other auditing procedures. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the three years in the period then ended and the period from the start of business, March 30, 2007, to December 31, 2007, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 16, 2011
15
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund as of December 31, 2010
FEDERAL TAX INFORMATION (Unaudited)
As required by the Internal Revenue Code and/or regulations, shareholders must be notified within 60 days of the Fund’s fiscal year end regarding the status of qualified dividend income for individuals and the dividends received deduction for corporations.
Qualified Dividend Income. The Fund designates $658,535, or up to the maximum amount of such dividends allowable pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, as qualified dividend income eligible for the reduced tax rate of 15%.
Dividends Received Deduction. Corporate shareholders are generally entitled to take the dividends received deduction on the portion of the Fund’s dividend distribution that qualifies under tax law. For the Fund’s fiscal 2010 ordinary income dividends, 100% qualifies for the corporate dividends received deduction.
16
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ CONTRACT APPROVAL
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuance is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 26, 2010, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board, which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held between February and April 2010. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| | |
| • | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| • | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund (including yield where relevant) to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| • | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to relevant peer groups of similarly managed funds and appropriate indices; |
| • | For each fund, comparative information concerning the fees charged and the services provided by each adviser in managing other mutual funds and institutional accounts using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such fund; |
| • | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management
| | |
| • | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| • | Information concerning the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through “soft dollar” benefits received in connection with the funds’ brokerage, and the implementation of a soft dollar reimbursement program established with respect to the funds; |
| • | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| • | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
Information about each Adviser
| | |
| • | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| • | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| • | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| • | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s policies and procedures relating to proxy voting, the handling of corporate actions and class actions; |
| • | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| • | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
| • | A description of Eaton Vance Management’s procedures for overseeing third party advisers and sub-advisers; |
Other Relevant Information
| | |
| • | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| • | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| • | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
17
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ CONTRACT APPROVAL CONT’D
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2010, with respect to one or more Funds, the Board met ten times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met nine, thirteen, three, eight and fifteen times, respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees received, among other things, presentations by the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to the investment performance of each fund and the investment strategies used in pursuing the fund’s investment objective including, where relevant, the use of derivative instruments, as well as trading policies and procedures and risk management techniques.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuance of the investment advisory agreement of Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Fund. The Board specifically noted the Adviser’s in-house equity research capabilities. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation methods of the Adviser to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund by senior management.
The Board also reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests in recent years from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds, including the ability, in many cases, to exchange an investment among different funds without incurring additional sales charges.
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
18
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund
BOARD OF TRUSTEES’ CONTRACT APPROVAL CONT’D
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices. The Board reviewed comparative performance data for the one-year period ended September 30, 2009 for the Fund. In light of the Fund’s relatively brief operating history, the Board concluded that additional time is required to evaluate Fund performance.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates payable by the Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2009, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board also considered factors that had an impact on Fund expense ratios, as identified by management in response to inquiries from the Contract Review Committee, as well as actions being taken to reduce expenses at the Eaton Vance fund complex level. The Board also considered that the Adviser had waived fees and/or paid expenses for the Fund.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with its relationship with the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Fund and other investment advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the benefits from economies of scale are currently being shared equitably by the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund. The Board also concluded that the structure of the advisory fee, which includes breakpoints at several asset levels, can be expected to cause the Adviser and its affiliates and the Fund to continue to share such benefits equitably.
19
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION
Fund Management. The Trustees of Eaton Vance Variable Trust (the Trust) are responsible for the overall management and supervision of the Trust’s affairs. The Trustees and officers of the Trust are listed below. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the last five years. Trustees and officers of the Trust hold indefinite terms of office. The “Noninterested Trustees” consist of those Trustees who are not “interested persons” of the Trust, as that term is defined under the 1940 Act. The business address of each Trustee and officer is Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110. As used below, “EVC” refers to Eaton Vance Corporation, “EV” refers to Eaton Vance, Inc., “EVM” refers to Eaton Vance Management, “BMR” refers to Boston Management and Research, “EVD” refers to Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., and “OrbiMed” refers to OrbiMed Advisors LLC. EVC and EV are the corporate parent and trustee, respectively, of EVM and BMR. EVD is the Fund’s principal underwriter and a wholly-owned subsidiary of EVC. Each officer affiliated with Eaton Vance may hold a position with other Eaton Vance affiliates that is comparable to his or her position with EVM listed below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | During Past Five Years and
| | Overseen By
| | | Other Directorships Held
|
Year of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | Other Relevant Experience | | Trustee(1) | | | During the Last Five Years(2) |
|
|
|
Interested Trustee |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Thomas E. Faust Jr. 1958 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVC, Director and President of EV, Chief Executive Officer and President of EVM and BMR, and Director of EVD. Trustee and/or officer of 175 registered investment companies and 1 private investment company managed by EVM or BMR. Mr. Faust is an interested person because of his positions with EVM, BMR, EVD, EVC and EV, which are affiliates of the Trust. | | | 175 | | | Director of EVC. |
|
Noninterested Trustees |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Benjamin C. Esty 1963 | | Trustee | | Since 2005 | | Roy and Elizabeth Simmons Professor of Business Administration and Finance Unit Head, Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration. | | | 175 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Allen R. Freedman 1940 | | Trustee | | Since 2007 | | Private Investor and Consultant. Former Chairman (2002-2004) and a Director (1983-2004) of Systems & Computer Technology Corp. (provider of software to higher education). Formerly, a Director of Loring Ward International (fund distributor) (2005-2007). Formerly, Chairman and a Director of Indus International, Inc. (provider of enterprise management software to the power generating industry) (2005-2007). | | | 175 | | | Director of Assurant, Inc. (insurance provider) and Stonemor Partners, L.P. (owner and operator of cemeteries). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
William H. Park 1947 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Chief Financial Officer, Aveon Group L.P. (an investment management firm) (since 2010). Formerly, Vice Chairman, Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company) (2006-2010). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm) (2002-2005). Formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, United Asset Management Corporation (an institutional investment management firm) (1982-2001). Formerly, Senior Manager, Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm) (1972-1981). | | | 175 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ronald A. Pearlman 1940 | | Trustee | | Since 2003 | | Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center. Formerly, Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy) and Assistant Secretary (Tax Policy), U.S. Department of the Treasury (1983-1985). Formerly, Chief of Staff, Joint Committee on Taxation, U.S. Congress (1988-1990). | | | 175 | | | None |
20
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | | | Number of Portfolios
| | | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | Principal Occupation(s)
| | in Fund Complex
| | | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | During Past Five Years and
| | Overseen By
| | | Other Directorships Held
|
Year of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | Other Relevant Experience | | Trustee(1) | | | During the Last Five Years(2) |
|
|
Noninterested Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Helen Frame Peters 1948 | | Trustee | | Since 2008 | | Professor of Finance, Carroll School of Management, Boston College. Formerly, Dean, Carroll School of Management, Boston College (2000-2002). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Fixed Income, Scudder Kemper Investments (investment management firm) (1998-1999). Formerly, Chief Investment Officer, Equity and Fixed Income, Colonial Management Associates (investment management firm) (1991-1998). | | | 175 | | | Director of BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (wholesale club retailer). Formerly, Trustee of SPDR Index Shares Funds and SPDR Series Trust (exchange traded funds) (2000-2009). Formerly, Director of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (a bank for banks) (2007-2009). |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Lynn A. Stout 1957 | | Trustee | | Since 2000 | | Paul Hastings Professor of Corporate and Securities Law (since 2006) and Professor of Law (2001-2006), University of California at Los Angeles School of Law. Professor Stout teaches classes in corporate law and securities regulation and is the author of numerous academic and professional papers on these areas. | | | 175 | | | None |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Ralph F. Verni 1943 | | Chairman of the Board and Trustee | | Chairman of the Board since 2007 and Trustee since 2005 | | Consultant and private investor. Formerly, Chief Investment Officer (1982-1992), Chief Financial Officer (1988-1990) and Director (1982-1992), New England Life. Formerly, Chairperson, New England Mutual Funds (1982-1992). Formerly, President and Chief Executive Officer, State Street Management & Research (1992-2000). Formerly, Chairperson, State Street Research Mutual Funds (1992-2000). Formerly, Director, W.P. Carey, LLC (1998-2004) and First Pioneer Farm Credit Corp. (2002-2006). | | | 175 | | | None |
Principal Officers who are not Trustees
| | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Year of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
| | | | | | |
Duncan W. Richardson 1957 | | President | | Since 2008 | | Director of EVC and Executive Vice President and Chief Equity Investment Officer of EVC, EVM and BMR. Officer of 88 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Matthew F. Beaudry 1962 | | Vice President | | Since 2010 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2006. Previously, Senior Vice President, Alliance Bernstein Investment Research and Management (2000-2006). Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Michael Botthof 1967 | | Vice President | | Since 2011 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 9 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
John D. Crowley 1971 | | Vice President | | Since 2010 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Samuel D. Isaly 1945 | | Vice President | | Since 2000 | | Managing Partner of OrbiMed. Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Stephen J. Kaszynski 1954 | | Vice President | | Since 2010 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR since 2008. Previously, Managing Director and Head of U.S. Equities for Credit Suisse Asset Management, as well as the lead portfolio manager of a Credit Suisse fund (2004-2007). Officer of 3 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
21
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION CONT’D
| | | | | | |
| | | | Term of
| | |
| | Position(s)
| | Office and
| | |
Name and
| | with the
| | Length of
| | Principal Occupation(s)
|
Year of Birth | | Trust | | Service | | During Past Five Years |
|
|
Principal Officers who are not Trustees (continued) |
| | | | | | |
Michael R. Mach 1947 | | Vice President | | Since 2006 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 28 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Scott H. Page 1959 | | Vice President | | Since 2000 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 9 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Craig P. Russ 1963 | | Vice President | | Since 2007 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 5 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Andrew N. Sveen 1961 | | Vice President | | Since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 2 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Barbara E. Campbell 1957 | | Treasurer | | Since 2005 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 175 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Maureen A. Gemma 1960 | | Secretary and Chief Legal Officer | | Secretary since 2007 and Chief Legal Officer since 2008 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 175 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | | | | | |
Paul M. O’Neil 1953 | | Chief Compliance Officer | | Since 2004 | | Vice President of EVM and BMR. Officer of 175 registered investment companies managed by EVM or BMR. |
| | |
(1) | | Includes both master and feeder funds in a master-feeder structure. |
|
(2) | | During their respective tenures, the Trustees also served as trustees of one or more of the following Eaton Vance funds (which operated in the years noted): Eaton Vance Credit Opportunities Fund (launched in 2005 and terminated in 2010); Eaton Vance Insured Florida Plus Municipal Bond Fund (launched in 2002 and terminated in 2009); and Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Trust (launched in 1998 and terminated in 2009). |
The SAI for the Fund includes additional information about the Trustees and officers of the Fund and can be obtained without charge on Eaton Vance’s website at www.eatonvance.com or by calling 1-800-262-1122.
22
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Investment Adviser and Administrator of Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value Fund
Eaton Vance Management
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(617) 482-8260
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
State Street Bank and Trust Company
200 Clarendon Street
Boston, MA 02116
Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmDeloitte & Touche LLP
200 Berkeley Street
Boston, MA 02116-5022
Eaton Vance VT Large-Cap Value FundTwo International Place
Boston, MA 02110
* FINRA BrokerCheck. Investors may check the background of their Investment Professional by contacting the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). FINRA BrokerCheck is a free tool to help investors check the professional background of current and former FINRA-registered securities firms and brokers. FINRA BrokerCheck is available by calling 1-800-289-9999 and at www.FINRA.org. The FINRA BrokerCheck brochure describing the program is available to investors at www.FINRA.org.
This report is prepared for the general information of contract owners. It is authorized for distribution to prospective investors only when preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus or summary prospectus. Before investing, investors should consider carefully the Fund’s investment objective(s), risks, and charges and expenses. The Fund’s current prospectus or summary prospectus contains this and other information about the Fund and is available through your financial advisor. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money. For further information please call 1-800-262-1122.
Item 2. Code of Ethics
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. The registrant undertakes to provide a copy of such code of ethics to any person upon request, without charge, by calling 1-800-262-1122.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrant’s Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is the Chief Financial Officer of Aveon Group, L.P. (an investment management firm). Previously, he served as the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company), as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm), as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (an institutional
investment management firm) and as a Senior Manager at Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
(a)-(d)
VT Floating- Rate Income Fund and VT Large- Cap Value Fund (the “Fund(s)”) are series of Eaton Vance Variable Trust (the “Trust”), a Massachusetts business trust, which, including the Funds, contains a total of 2 series (the “Series”). The Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 as an open-end management investment company. This Form N-CSR relates to the Funds’ annual reports.
The following table presents the aggregate fees billed to each Fund for the Fund’s fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2010 by the Fund’s principal accountant, Deloitte & Touche LLP (“D&T”), for professional services rendered for the audit of the Fund’s annual financial statements and fees billed for other services rendered by D&T during such periods.
VT Floating-Rate Income Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 12/31/09 | | | 12/31/10 | |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 32,740 | | | $ | 34,290 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | $ | 1,550 | | | $ | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | $ | 7,130 | | | $ | 7,130 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | $ | 2,500 | | | $ | 1,900 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 43,920 | | | $ | 43,320 | |
| | |
VT Large-Cap Value Fund
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 12/31/09 | | | 12/31/10 | |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 30,540 | | | $ | 32,090 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | $ | 1,550 | | | $ | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | $ | 8,080 | | | $ | 8,080 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | $ | 2,500 | | | $ | 1,900 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 42,670 | | | $ | 42,070 | |
| | |
| | |
(1) | | Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported under the category of audit fees. |
|
(2) | | Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically include fees for tax return preparation and other tax related compliance/planning matters |
|
(3) | | All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax services. |
The following table presents the aggregate audit, audit-related, tax, and other fees billed to all of the Series in the Trust by D&T for the last two fiscal years of each Series.
| | | | | | | | |
| | 12/31/09 | | | 12/31/10 | |
|
Audit Fees | | $ | 88,120 | | | $ | 66,380 | |
Audit-Related Fees(1) | | $ | 4,650 | | | $ | 0 | |
Tax Fees(2) | | $ | 21,220 | | | $ | 15,210 | |
All Other Fees(3) | | $ | 7,500 | | | $ | 3,800 | |
| | |
Total | | $ | 121,490 | | | $ | 85,390 | |
| | |
| | |
(1) | | Audit-related fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonable related to the performance of the audit of financial statements and are not reported under the category of audit fees. |
|
(2) | | Tax fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant relating to tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning and specifically include fees for tax return preparation. |
|
(3) | | All other fees consist of the aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by the principal accountant other than audit, audit-related, and tax services. |
(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted policies and procedures relating to the pre-approval of services provided by the registrant’s principal accountant (the “Pre-Approval Policies”). The Pre-Approval Policies establish a framework intended to assist the audit committee in the proper discharge of its pre-approval responsibilities. As a general matter, the Pre-Approval Policies (i) specify certain types of audit, audit-related, tax, and other services determined to be pre-approved by the audit committee; and (ii) delineate specific procedures governing the mechanics of the pre-approval process, including the approval and monitoring of audit and non-audit service fees. Unless a service is specifically pre-approved under the Pre-Approval Policies, it must be separately pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
The Pre-Approval Policies and the types of audit and non-audit services pre-approved therein must be reviewed and ratified by the registrant’s audit committee at least annually. The registrant’s audit committee maintains full responsibility for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of the work of the registrant’s principal accountant.
(e)(2) No services described in paragraphs (b)-(d) above were approved by the registrant’s audit committee pursuant to the “de minimis exception” set forth in Rule 2-01 (c)(7)(i)(C) of Regulation S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) The following table presents (i) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed for services rendered to all of the Series in the Trust by D&T for the last two fiscal years of each Series; and (ii) the aggregate non-audit fees (i.e., fees for audit-related, tax, and other services) billed to the Eaton Vance organization by D&T for the last two fiscal years of each Series.
| | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Years Ended | | 12/31/09 | | | 12/31/10 | |
|
Registrant | | $ | 33,370 | | | $ | 19,010 | |
Eaton Vance(1) | | $ | 288,295 | | | $ | 250,973 | |
| | |
(1) | | Includes all of the Series in the Trust. |
|
(2) | | The investment adviser to the Funds, as well as any of its affiliates that provide ongoing services to the Funds, are subsidiaries of Eaton Vance Corp. |
(h) The registrant’s audit committee has considered whether the provision by the registrant’s principal accountant of non-audit services to the registrant’s investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(ii) of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not required in this filing.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers
Not required in this filing.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
(a)(1) | | Registrant’s Code of Ethics — Not applicable (please see Item 2). |
|
(a)(2)(i) | | Treasurer’s Section 302 certification. |
|
(a)(2)(ii) | | President’s Section 302 certification. |
|
(b) | | Combined Section 906 certification. |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | |
|
Eaton Vance Variable Trust | | |
| | | | |
By: | | /s/ Duncan W. Richardson | | |
| | Duncan W. Richardson | | |
| | President | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | February 14, 2011 | | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| | | | |
|
By: | | /s/ Barbara E. Campbell | | |
| | Barbara E. Campbell | | |
| | Treasurer | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | February 14, 2011 | | |
| | | | |
By: | | /s/ Duncan W. Richardson | | |
| | Duncan W. Richardson | | |
| | President | | |
| | | | |
Date: | | February 14, 2011 | | |