UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-21624
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
5701 Golden Hills Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55416-1297
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc., 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200, Columbus, OH 43219-8000
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 800-624-0197
Date of fiscal year end: December 31
Date of reporting period: December 31, 2016
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
AZL® Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 5
Statement of Operations
Page 5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 6
Financial Highlights
Page 7
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 12
Other Federal Income Tax Information
Page 13
Other Information
Page 14
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 15
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 17
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL® Balanced Index Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Allianz Investment Management LLC
serves as the Manager for the AZL®
Balanced Index Strategy Fund.
What factors affected the Fund’s performance during the year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL® Balanced Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) had a total return of 6.75%. That compared to a 11.96%, 2.65% and 7.28% total return for its benchmarks, the S&P 500 Index1, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, and the Balanced Composite Index1, respectively.
The Fund is a fund of funds that pursues broad diversification across four equity sub-portfolios and one fixed-income sub-portfolio. The four equity sub-portfolios pursue passive strategies that aim to achieve, before fees, returns similar to the S&P 500 Index, the S&P 400 Index2, the S&P 600 Index3 and the MSCI EAFE Index4, which represents shares of large companies in developed foreign markets. The fixed-income sub-portfolio is an enhanced bond index strategy that seeks to achieve a return that exceeds that of the Bloomberg Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Generally, the Fund allocates 40% to 60% of its assets to the underlying equity index funds and between 40% and 60% to the underlying bond index fund.*
Overall, 2016 brought a favorable economic backdrop for stocks. Major equity categories posted gains during the period under review, as U.S. economic growth remained steady, corporate earnings in most sectors proved robust, central banks in many major economies continued to pursue accommodative strategies, and merger activity increased. Even so, the path of equity returns was not linear. For example, global markets declined sharply following Britain’s June vote to leave the European Union, but stocks recovered quickly. Meanwhile, U.S. equities posted particularly strong gains during a year-end rally after Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election. The S&P 500 gained 11.96% during the period while the MSCI EAFE, burdened in part by the impact of a strengthening dollar, rose 1.00%.
Fixed-income markets were generally positive during the period under review. The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate for the second time in a decade and indicated that more rate hikes are likely in 2017. Spreads between U.S. Treasuries and corporate bonds tightened during the year, as investors searched for higher yields. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index gained 2.65% during the period under review.
The Fund underperformed its composite benchmark for the period under review. The underperformance was primarily driven by the Fund’s strategic allocation to international equity markets, which broadly lagged domestic stocks during the period. The underlying fixed-income portfolio also lagged its benchmark during the period, which further weighed on the Fund’s relative performance against the composite benchmark.*
The Fund’s allocations to small- and mid-cap U.S. equities, however, contributed positively to relative returns as they collectively outperformed the larger stocks found in the S&P 500 Index. The S&P 400 Index gained 20.74% during the period while the S&P 600 Index rose 26.56%.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. |
2 | The Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (“S&P 400”) is the most widely used index for mid-sized companies. The S&P 400 covers 7% of the U.S. equities market, and is part of a series of S&P U.S. indices that can be used as building blocks for portfolio composition. |
3 | The Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index (“S&P 600”) covers approximately 3% of the domestic equities market. Measuring the small-cap segment of the market that is typically renowned for poor trading liquidity and financial instability, the index is designed to be an efficient portfolio of companies that meet specific inclusion criteria to ensure that they are investable and financially viable. |
4 | The Morgan Stanley Capital International, Europe, Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. |
Investors cannot invest directly in an index. |
1
AZL® Balanced Index Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation with preservation of capital as an important consideration. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a combination of Index Strategy Underlying Funds that represent different classes in the Fund’s asset allocation.
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in underlying funds, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of those underlying funds. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by each of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests.
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
Small- to mid-capitalization companies typically have a higher risk of failure and historically have experienced a greater degree of volatility.
Bonds offer a relatively stable level of income, although bond prices will fluctuate, providing the potential for principal gain or loss.
The performance of the Fund is expected to be lower than that of the Indices because of Fund fees and expenses. Securities in which the Fund will invest may involve substantial risk and may be subject to sudden severe price declines.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark as well as the two component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016
1 Year | 3 Year | 5 Year | Since Inception (7/10/09) | |||||||||||||
AZL® Balanced Index Strategy Fund | 6.75 | % | 4.25 | % | 7.13 | % | 8.38 | % | ||||||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 8.87 | % | 14.66 | % | 15.74 | % | ||||||||
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 2.65 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.23 | % | 3.77 | % | ||||||||
Balanced Composite Index | 7.28 | % | 6.00 | % | 8.44 | % | 9.90 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL® Balanced Index Strategy Fund | 0.70 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.20% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the Permitted Underlying Funds. Accordingly, Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.08%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”), the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the Balanced Composite Index (“Composite”). The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value-weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year. The Composite is a blended index comprised of (50%) S&P 500 and (50%) Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,027.60 | $ | 0.41 | 0.08 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,024.73 | $ | 0.41 | 0.08 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Fixed Income | 48.8 | % | |||
Domestic Equities | 38.5 | ||||
International Equities | 12.7 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 100.0 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | — | ^ | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
^ | Represents less than 0.05%. |
3
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Affiliated Investment Companies (100.0%): |
| ||||||
20,027,501 | AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | $ | 213,693,435 | |||||
3,942,947 | AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 55,595,556 | ||||||
1,618,162 | AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 34,709,583 | ||||||
8,178,042 | AZL S&P 500 Index Fund, Class 2 | 114,983,267 | ||||||
1,364,053 | AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund, Class 2 | 19,410,475 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Affiliated Investment Companies (Cost $365,875,172) | 438,392,316 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Investment Securities | 438,392,316 | ||||||
| Net other assets (liabilities) — 0.0% | (92,188 | ) | |||||
|
| |||||||
| Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 438,300,128 | |||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
(a) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | $ | 365,875,172 | |||
|
| ||||
Investments in affiliates, at value | $ | 438,392,316 | |||
Interest and dividends receivable | 7 | ||||
Receivable for affiliated investments sold | 15,960 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 2,478 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 438,410,761 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Cash overdraft | 12,088 | ||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 57,318 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 18,619 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 4,782 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 1,015 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 1,243 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 944 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 14,624 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 110,633 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 438,300,128 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 337,170,922 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | 9,832,388 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | 18,779,674 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | 72,517,144 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 438,300,128 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 27,836,662 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 15.75 | |||
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | |||||
Dividends from affiliates | $ | 8,364,785 | |||
Dividends | 2,814 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Income | 8,367,599 | ||||
|
| ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Manager fees | 219,461 | ||||
Administration fees | 54,461 | ||||
Custodian fees | 1,915 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 7,401 | ||||
Trustee fees | 25,128 | ||||
Professional fees | 18,807 | ||||
Shareholder reports | 12,387 | ||||
Other expenses | 8,979 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total expenses | 348,539 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 8,019,060 | ||||
|
| ||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions from affiliates | 584,036 | ||||
Net realized gains distributions from affiliated underlying funds | 21,154,188 | ||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | (1,251,752 | ) | |||
|
| ||||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 20,486,472 | ||||
|
| ||||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 28,505,532 | |||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||
Change in Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 8,019,060 | $ | 9,500,793 | ||||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | 21,738,224 | 9,924,533 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | (1,251,752 | ) | (19,559,324 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 28,505,532 | (133,998 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||
From net investment income | (11,827,600 | ) | (4,617,163 | ) | ||||||
From net realized gains | (7,976,603 | ) | (8,184,855 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | (19,804,203 | ) | (12,802,018 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 30,164,569 | 46,025,398 | ||||||||
Proceeds from dividends reinvested | 19,804,203 | 12,802,018 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (52,905,698 | ) | (52,006,249 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | (2,936,926 | ) | 6,821,167 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | 5,764,403 | (6,114,849 | ) | |||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 432,535,725 | 438,650,574 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 438,300,128 | $ | 432,535,725 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | 9,832,388 | $ | 11,827,596 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 1,926,476 | 2,880,212 | ||||||||
Dividends reinvested | 1,277,690 | 837,828 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (3,384,739 | ) | (3,264,041 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | (180,573 | ) | 453,999 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 15.44 | $ | 15.91 | $ | 15.40 | $ | 13.91 | $ | 12.84 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Investment Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.30 | 0.34 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 0.73 | (0.34 | ) | 0.78 | 1.63 | 1.19 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 1.03 | — | (a) | 0.94 | 1.78 | 1.32 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders From: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | (0.43 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.23 | ) | (0.25 | ) | (0.19 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains | (0.29 | ) | (0.30 | ) | (0.20 | ) | (0.04 | ) | (0.06 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Dividends | (0.72 | ) | (0.47 | ) | (0.43 | ) | (0.29 | ) | (0.25 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 15.75 | $ | 15.44 | $ | 15.91 | $ | 15.40 | $ | 13.91 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Return(b) | 6.75 | % | 0.01 | % | 6.11 | % | 12.93 | % | 10.29 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 438,300 | $ | 432,536 | $ | 438,651 | $ | 413,982 | $ | 354,111 | |||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 1.83 | % | 2.14 | % | 1.02 | % | 1.10 | % | 1.08 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Before Reductions*(c) | 0.08 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.09 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions* | 0.08 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.08 | % | 0.09 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 12 | % | 11 | % | 9 | % | 8 | % | 7 | % |
* | The expense ratios exclude the impact of fees/expenses paid by each underlying fund. |
(a) | Represents less than $0.005. |
(b) | The returns include reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but exclude insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(c) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
7
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services - Investment Companies. The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, and reclassification of certain distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust.
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018. Expenses incurred for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.”
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund | 0.05 | % | 0.20 | % |
8
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.” At December 31, 2016, there were no remaining contractual reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years.
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the period can be found on the Statement of Operations. During year ended December 31, 2016, there were no voluntary waivers.
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | $ | 217,300,256 | $ | 22,260,513 | $ | (23,623,435 | ) | $ | 213,693,435 | $ | 4,339,676 | ||||||||||||||
AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 53,818,168 | 6,783,103 | (4,054,259 | ) | 55,595,556 | 1,427,574 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 32,048,328 | 6,444,534 | (5,051,767 | ) | 34,709,583 | 338,224 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL S&P 500 Index Fund, Class 2 | 112,168,493 | 18,504,307 | (15,476,927 | ) | 114,983,267 | 2,068,710 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund, Class 2 | 16,961,754 | 3,688,647 | (2,711,683 | ) | 19,410,475 | 190,601 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | 432,296,999 | $ | 57,681,104 | $ | (50,918,071 | ) | $ | 438,392,316 | $ | 8,364,785 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair values services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $4,485 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments in other investment companies are valued at their published net asset value (“NAV”). Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board” or “Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). The investments utilizing Level 1 valuations represent investments in open-end investment companies.
9
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Companies | $ | 438,392,316 | $ | — | $ | 438,392,316 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | $ | 438,392,316 | $ | — | $ | 438,392,316 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 57,681,104 | $ | 50,918,071 |
6. Investment Risks
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest directly or through affiliated or unaffiliated mutual funds or unregistered investment pools in derivative instruments such as futures, options, and options on futures. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The other party to a derivatives contract could default. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund did not directly invest in derivatives.
7. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
Cost of securities for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $367,827,544. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 72,517,144 | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (1,952,372 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | 70,564,772 | ||
|
|
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 11,827,600 | $ | 7,976,603 | $ | 19,804,203 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 4,617,163 | $ | 8,184,855 | $ | 12,802,018 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
10
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 9,834,478 | $ | 20,729,956 | $ | — | $ | 70,564,772 | $ | 101,129,206 |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
8. Ownership and Principal Holders
The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a fund creates presumptions of control of the fund, under section 2 (a)(9) of the 1940 Act. As of December 31, 2016, the Fund had an individual shareholder account which is affiliated with the Investment Adviser representing ownership in excess of 90% of the Fund.
9. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies - Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN - also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
10. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
11
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with the transfer agents of the underlying funds. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
12
Other Federal Income Tax Information (Unaudited)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, 24.40% of the total ordinary income dividends paid by the Fund qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net long-term capital gain distributions of $7,976,603.
13
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (‘‘Commission’’) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
14
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
15
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
16
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. | |||||
Interested Trustees(3)
| ||||||||||
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
17
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 54 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 48 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without charge, by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197.
18
The Allianz VIP Fund of Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. | ||
These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
AZL® DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 5
Statement of Operations
Page 5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 6
Financial Highlights
Page 7
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 12
Other Federal Income Tax Information
Page 13
Other Information
Page 14
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 15
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 17
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL® DFA Multi-Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Allianz Investment Management LLC serves as the Manager for the AZL® DFA Multi-Strategy Fund.
What factors affected the Fund’s performance during the year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL® DFA Multi-Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) returned 9.32%. That compared to a 11.96%, 2.65% and 8.21% total return for its benchmarks, the S&P 500 Index1, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, and the Multi-Strategy Composite Index1, respectively.
The Fund is a fund of funds that pursues broad diversification across four equity sub-portfolios and one fixed-income sub-portfolio. The five underlying portfolios are managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors. Generally, the Fund allocates 50% to 70% of its assets to the underlying equity funds and between 30% and 50% to the underlying fixed-income fund.*
U.S. stocks posted solid gains for the period under review despite a challenging start. Concerns about global economic growth in January and February drove investors away from higher risk securities, pushing down equity markets to start the year. Markets rebounded in mid-February, however, and went on to post steady gains for most of the rest of the year, with the exception of a brief spike in volatility in June following the U.K.’s vote to exit the European Union.
U.S. labor markets continued to make gains during the year, although muted inflation figures kept the Federal Reserve in a dovish stance for most of the year. U.S. equity markets experienced a boost late in the year following the U.S. presidential election, as investors anticipated a more business-friendly environment.
Value stocks significantly outperformed growth stocks during 2016 while smaller stocks outperformed larger stocks; the S&P 500 Index gained 11.96% during the period while the S&P 600 Index2 gained 26.56% and the S&P 400 Index3 gained 20.74%. International equity markets were unable to keep up with their U.S. counterparts and generally experienced smaller gains, despite continued quantitative easing efforts by central banks in Europe and Japan. The MSCI EAFE Index4, burdened by the impact of a strengthening dollar, rose 1.00%.
Meanwhile, the U.S. bond market faced a significant headwind from rising interest rates. Treasury yields trended downward during the first half of the year, only to rise sharply after the surprising U.S. presidential election results led investors to believe inflation was on the horizon. Spreads fell throughout the year, after briefly rising during the first two months. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index gained 2.65%.
The Fund outperformed its composite benchmark during the period under review. Its domestic equity holdings benefited from a bias toward value stocks, which outperformed growth stocks for the period. The Fund’s greater-than-benchmark exposure to small- and mid-cap stocks also added to relative results, as those assets outperformed their large-cap counterparts. However, the Fund’s exposure to developed international equities negatively affected performance.*
Within its fixed-income portfolio, the Fund’s tilt toward short duration contributed positively to returns compared to its composite benchmark as interest rates rose during the year. However, the Fund’s high-credit-quality portfolio negatively affected performance as spreads generally tightened during the year.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. |
2 | The Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index (“S&P 600”) covers approximately 3% of the domestic equities market. Measuring the small-cap segment of the market that is typically renowned for poor trading liquidity and financial instability, the index is designed to be an efficient portfolio of companies that meet specific inclusion criteria to ensure that they are investable and financially viable. |
3 | The Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (“S&P 400”) is the most widely used index for mid-sized companies. The S&P 400 covers 7% of the U.S. equities market, and is part of a series of S&P U.S. indices that can be used as building blocks for portfolio composition. |
4 | The Morgan Stanley Capital International, Europe, Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. |
Investors cannot invest directly in an index. |
1
AZL® DFA Multi-Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a combination of DFA Underlying Funds that represent different classes in the Fund’s asset allocation.
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in underlying funds, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of those underlying funds. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by of the underlying fund in which the Fund invests.
Emerging market investing may be subject to additional economic, political, liquidity, and currency risks not associated with more developed countries.
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
Value-based investments are subject to the risk that the broad market may not recognize their intrinsic value.
Small- to mid-capitalization companies typically have a higher risk of failure and historically have experienced a greater degree of volatility.
Debt securities held by the Fund may decline in value due to rising interest rates. Interest rates in the U.S. are at, or near, historic lows, which may increase the Fund’s exposure to risks related to rising rates.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark, as well as the two component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016
Since | ||||||||||||||||
1 | 3 | 5 | Inception | |||||||||||||
Year | Year | Year | (7/10/09) | |||||||||||||
AZL® DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | 9.32 | % | 4.97 | % | 9.68 | % | 10.66 | % | ||||||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 8.87 | % | 14.66 | % | 15.74 | % | ||||||||
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 2.65 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.23 | % | 3.77 | % | ||||||||
Multi-Strategy Composite Index | 8.21 | % | 6.58 | % | 9.68 | % | 11.09 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL® DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | 0.98 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.20% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the Permitted Underlying Funds. Accordingly, Acquired Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.07%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”), the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the Multi-Strategy Composite Index (“Composite”). The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value-weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year. The Composite is a blended index comprised of (60%) S&P 500 and (40%) Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,058.70 | $ | 0.36 | 0.07 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,024.78 | $ | 0.36 | 0.07 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Domestic Equities | �� | 49.7 | % | ||
Fixed Income | 38.8 | ||||
International Equities | 11.5 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 100.0 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | — | ^ | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
^ | Represents less than 0.05%. |
3
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Affiliated Investment Companies (100.0%): | |||||||
6,577,678 | AZL DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund | $ | 55,318,276 | |||||
46,426,456 | AZL DFA Five-Year Global Fixed Income Fund | 462,407,497 | ||||||
8,997,409 | AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund | 82,866,140 | ||||||
43,085,107 | AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund | 462,734,052 | ||||||
11,432,987 | AZL DFA U.S. Small Cap Fund | 130,564,710 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Affiliated Investment Companies | 1,193,890,675 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Investment Securities | 1,193,890,675 | ||||||
| Net other assets (liabilities) — 0.0% | 278,675 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 1,194,169,350 | |||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
(a) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | $ | 1,163,394,585 | |||
|
| ||||
Investments in affiliates, at value | $ | 1,193,890,675 | |||
Cash | 3,815 | ||||
Interest and dividends receivable | 94 | ||||
Receivable for capital shares issued | 393,277 | ||||
Receivable for affiliated investments sold | 369,926 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 6,167 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 1,194,663,954 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 392,353 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 50,769 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 5,253 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 2,301 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 3,418 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 2,595 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 37,915 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 494,604 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 1,194,169,350 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 1,158,280,574 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | 9,184,122 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | (3,791,436 | ) | |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | 30,496,090 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 1,194,169,350 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 94,079,291 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 12.69 | |||
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | |||||
Dividends from affiliates | $ | 9,828,500 | |||
Dividends | 69 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Income | 9,828,569 | ||||
|
| ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Manager fees | 598,599 | ||||
Administration fees | 59,643 | ||||
Custodian fees | 3,875 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 19,404 | ||||
Trustee fees | 65,222 | ||||
Professional fees | 48,548 | ||||
Shareholder reports | 28,341 | ||||
Other expenses | 26,018 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total expenses | 849,650 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 8,978,919 | ||||
|
| ||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions from affiliates | (3,676,956 | ) | |||
Net realized gains distributions from affiliated underlying funds | 215,858 | ||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 99,815,406 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 96,354,308 | ||||
|
| ||||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 105,333,227 | |||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||
Change in Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 8,978,919 | $ | (990,621 | ) | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | (3,461,098 | ) | 427,175,530 | |||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 99,815,406 | (431,648,756 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 105,333,227 | (5,463,847 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||
From net investment income | — | (16,616,509 | ) | |||||||
From net realized gains | (423,638,534 | ) | (18,692,510 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | (423,638,534 | ) | (35,309,019 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 15,533,641 | 67,727,097 | ||||||||
Proceeds from dividends reinvested | 423,638,534 | 35,309,019 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (184,491,032 | ) | (244,017,781 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | 254,681,143 | (140,981,665 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | (63,624,164 | ) | (181,754,531 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 1,257,793,514 | 1,439,548,045 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 1,194,169,350 | $ | 1,257,793,514 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | 9,184,122 | $ | — | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 995,074 | 3,586,937 | ||||||||
Dividends reinvested | 34,696,030 | 1,961,612 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (11,189,344 | ) | (12,894,522 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | 24,501,760 | (7,345,973 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 18.08 | $ | 18.71 | $ | 17.86 | $ | 14.96 | $ | 13.37 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Investment Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 1.32 | (0.14 | ) | 0.96 | 2.97 | 1.64 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 1.42 | (0.13 | ) | 1.16 | 3.13 | 1.77 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders From: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | — | (0.24 | ) | (0.22 | ) | (0.20 | ) | (0.16 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains | (6.81 | ) | (0.26 | ) | (0.09 | ) | (0.03 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Dividends | (6.81 | ) | (0.50 | ) | (0.31 | ) | (0.23 | ) | (0.18 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 12.69 | $ | 18.08 | $ | 18.71 | $ | 17.86 | $ | 14.96 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Return(a) | 9.32 | % | (0.67 | )% | 6.53 | % | 21.07 | % | 13.33 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 1,194,169 | $ | 1,257,794 | $ | 1,439,548 | $ | 1,347,836 | $ | 963,143 | |||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.75 | % | (0.07 | )% | 1.09 | % | 1.20 | % | 1.10 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Before Reductions*(b) | 0.07 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.08 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions* | 0.07 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.07 | % | 0.08 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate(c) | 2 | % | 114 | %(d) | 7 | % | 3 | % | 6 | % |
* | The expense ratios exclude the impact of fees/expenses paid by each underlying fund. |
(a) | The returns include reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but exclude insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(b) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
(c) | The portfolio turnover rate can be volatile due to the amount and timing of purchases and sales of fund shares during the period. |
(d) | Effective April 27, 2015, the investment strategy of the Fund changed. Costs of purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio securities associated with the changes in investment strategy contributed to higher portfolio turnover rate for the period ended December 31, 2015 as compared to prior years. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
7
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services - Investment Companies. The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold and on foreign currency transactions are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, reclassification of certain market discounts, gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust.
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018. Expenses incurred for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.”
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | 0.05 | % | 0.20 | % |
8
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.” At December 31, 2016, there were no remaining contractual reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years.
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the period can be found on the Statement of Operations. During year ended December 31, 2016, there were no voluntary waivers.
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund | $ | 60,421,230 | $ | 512,089 | $ | (12,817,959 | ) | $ | 55,318,276 | $ | 501,744 | ||||||||||||||
AZL DFA Five-Year Global Fixed Income Fund | 506,986,619 | 10,690,732 | (58,176,301 | ) | 462,407,497 | 3,595,605 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund | 88,856,567 | 2,682,638 | (10,533,818 | ) | 82,866,140 | 960,107 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund | 477,504,072 | 6,619,577 | (78,413,000 | ) | 462,734,052 | 4,239,035 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA U.S. Small Cap Fund | 125,295,203 | 1,924,698 | (23,800,121 | ) | 130,564,710 | 532,009 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,259,063,691 | $ | 22,429,734 | $ | (183,741,199 | ) | $ | 1,193,890,675 | $ | 9,828,500 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair values services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $12,337 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments in other investment companies are valued at their published net asset value (“NAV”). Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board” or “Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). The investments utilizing Level 1 valuations represent investments in open-end investment companies.
9
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Companies | $ | 1,193,890,675 | $ | — | $ | 1,193,890,675 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | $ | 1,193,890,675 | $ | — | $ | 1,193,890,675 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 22,429,734 | $ | 183,741,199 |
6. Investment Risks
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest directly or through affiliated or unaffiliated mutual funds or unregistered investment pools in derivative instruments such as futures, options, and options on futures. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The other party to a derivatives contract could default. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund did not directly invest in derivatives.
7. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
Cost of securities for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $1,163,762,909. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 48,404,583 | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (18,276,817 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | 30,127,766 | ||
|
|
As of the end of its tax year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund has capital loss carry forwards (“CLCFs”) as summarized in the table below. CLCFs subject to expiration are applied as short-term capital loss regardless of whether the originating capital loss was short-term or long-term. CLCFs that are not subject to expiration must be utilized before those that are subject to expiration. The Board does not intend to authorize a distribution of any realized gain for the Fund until any applicable CLCF has been offset or expires.
CLCFs not subject to expiration:
Short Term Amount | Long Term Amount | Total Amount | |||||||||||||
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 2,345,371 | $ | 1,077,741 | $ | 3,423,112 |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 2,499,782 | $ | 421,138,752 | $ | 423,638,534 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
10
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 16,616,452 | $ | 18,692,567 | $ | 35,309,019 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 9,184,122 | $ | — | $ | (3,423,112 | ) | $ | 30,127,766 | $ | 35,888,776 |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
8. Ownership and Principal Holders
The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a fund creates presumptions of control of the fund, under section 2 (a)(9) of the 1940 Act. As of December 31, 2016, the Fund had an individual shareholder account which is affiliated with the Investment Adviser representing ownership in excess of 90% of the Fund. As of December 31, 2016, the Fund had a controlling interest (in excess of 50%) in the AZL DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund, the AZL DFA Five-Year Global Fixed Income Fund, AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund, and the AZL DFA U.S. Small Cap Fund, which are affiliated with the Investment Adviser.
9. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies - Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN - also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
10. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
11
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with transfer agents of the underlying funds. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
12
Other Federal Income Tax Information (Unaudited)
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net long-term capital gain distributions of $421,138,752.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net short-term capital gain distributions of $2,499,723.
13
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (‘‘Commission’’) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
14
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
15
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
16
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. | |||||
Interested Trustees(3)
| ||||||||||
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
17
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 54 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 48 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without charge, by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197.
18
The Allianz VIP Fund of Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. | ||
These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
AZL® MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 5
Statement of Operations
Page 5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 6
Financial Highlights
Page 7
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 13
Other Federal Income Tax Information
Page 14
Other Information
Page 15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 16
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 18
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL® MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Allianz Investment Management LLC serves as the Manager for the AZL® MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund.
What factors affected the Fund’s performance during the year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL® MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) returned 6.61%. That compared to a 11.96%, 2.65% and a 7.28% total return for its benchmarks, the S&P 500 Index1, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, and the Balanced Composite Index1, respectively.
The Fund is a fund of funds that pursues broad diversification across four equity sub-portfolios and one fixed-income sub-portfolio. The four equity sub-portfolios pursue passive strategies that aim to achieve, before fees, returns similar to the S&P 500 Index, the S&P 400 Index2, the S&P 600 Index3, and the MSCI EAFE Index4, which represents shares of large companies in developed foreign markets. The fixed-income sub-portfolio is an enhanced bond index strategy that seeks to achieve a return that exceeds that of the Bloomberg Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Generally, the Fund allocates 40% to 60% of its assets to the underlying equity index funds and between 40% and 60% to the underlying bond index fund. The Fund also employs the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process, which is intended to adjust the risk of the portfolio based on quantitative indicators of market risk, such as the current level of fund and market volatility.*
Overall, 2016 brought a favorable economic backdrop for stocks. Major equity categories posted gains during the period under review, as U.S. economic growth remained steady, corporate earnings in most sectors proved robust, central banks in many major economies continued to pursue accommodative strategies, and merger activity increased. Even so, the path of equity returns was not linear. For example, global markets declined sharply following Britain’s June vote to leave the European Union, but stocks recovered quickly. Meanwhile, U.S. equities posted particularly strong gains during a year-end rally after Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election. The S&P 500 gained 11.96% during 2016 while the MSCI EAFE, burdened by the impact of a strengthening dollar, rose 1.00%.
Fixed-income markets were generally positive during the period under review. The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate for the second time in a decade and indicated that more rate hikes are likely in 2017. Spreads between U.S. Treasuries and corporate bonds tightened during the year, as investors searched for higher yields. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index gained 2.65% during the period under review.
The Fund underperformed its composite benchmark for the period under review. The underperformance was primarily driven by the Fund’s strategic allocation to international equity markets, which broadly lagged domestic stocks during the period. The underlying fixed-income portfolio also lagged its benchmark during the period, which further weighed on the Fund’s relative performance against the composite benchmark.*
The Fund’s allocations to small- and mid-cap U.S. equities, however, contributed positively to relative returns as they collectively outperformed the larger stocks found in the S&P 500 Index. The S&P 400 Index gained 20.74% during the period while the S&P 600 Index rose 26.56%.*
The MVP risk management process that includes the use of derivatives worked as intended and largely maintained a neutral equity allocation for most of the year relative to its target. In early 2016, global growth concerns led to increased volatility and the MVP reduced the Fund’s equity exposure. Equity markets quickly recovered, however, and the MVP risk management process ultimately caused a drag on the Fund’s performance relative to its benchmark.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. |
2 | The Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (“S&P 400”) is the most widely used index for mid-sized companies. The S&P 400 covers 7% of the U.S. equities market, and is part of a series of S&P U.S. indices that can be used as building blocks for portfolio composition. |
3 | The Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index (“S&P 600”) covers approximately 3% of the domestic equities market. Measuring the small-cap segment of the market that is typically renowned for poor trading liquidity and financial instability, the index is designed to be an efficient portfolio of companies that meet specific inclusion criteria to ensure that they are investable and financially viable. |
4 | The Morgan Stanley Capital International, Europe, Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. |
Investors cannot invest directly in an index. |
1
AZL® MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation with preservation of capital as an important consideration. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a combination of Index Strategy Underlying Funds that represent different classes in the Fund’s asset allocation.
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in underlying funds, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of those underlying funds. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by each of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests.
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
Small- to mid-capitalization companies typically have a higher risk of failure and historically have experienced a greater degree of volatility.
Bonds offer a relatively stable level of income, although bond prices will fluctuate, providing the potential for principal gain or loss.
The performance of the Fund is expected to be lower than that of the Indices because of Fund fees and expenses. Securities in which the Fund will invest may involve substantial risk and may be subject to sudden severe price declines.
Investing in derivatives instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risk associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional instruments.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark, as well as the two component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016
Since | ||||||||||||
1 | 3 | Inception | ||||||||||
Year | Year | (1/10/12) | ||||||||||
AZL® MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund | 6.61 | % | 4.11 | % | 6.66 | % | ||||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 8.87 | % | 14.10 | % | ||||||
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 2.65 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.26 | % | ||||||
Balanced Composite Index | 7.28 | % | 6.00 | % | 8.19 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL® MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund | 0.73 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.20% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the Permitted Underlying Funds. Accordingly, Acquired Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.14%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”), the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the Balanced Composite Index (“Composite”). The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value-weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year. The Composite is a blended index comprised of (50%) S&P 500 and (50%) Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,026.10 | $ | 0.71 | 0.14 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,024.43 | $ | 0.71 | 0.14 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Fixed Income | 47.4 | % | |||
Domestic Equities | 35.3 | ||||
International Equities | 12.3 | ||||
Money Market | 0.2 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 95.2 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | 4.8 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
3
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Affiliated Investment Companies (95.0%): |
| ||||||
13,888,556 | AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | $ | 148,190,890 | |||||
2,727,556 | AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 38,458,535 | ||||||
1,134,810 | AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 24,341,674 | ||||||
5,140,234 | AZL S&P 500 Index Fund, Class 2 | 72,271,689 | ||||||
973,383 | AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund, Class 2 | 13,851,238 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Affiliated Investment Companies (Cost $285,678,819) | 297,114,026 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Unaffiliated Investment Company (0.2%): |
| ||||||
514,226 | Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management Fund, Institutional Shares , 0.31%(a) | 514,226 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Unaffiliated Investment Company (Cost $514,226) | 514,226 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Investment Securities (Cost $286,193,045)(b) — 95.2% | 297,628,252 | ||||||
| Net other assets (liabilities) — 4.8% | 15,116,714 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 312,744,966 | |||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
(a) | The rate represents the effective yield at December 31, 2016. |
(b) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
Futures Contracts
Cash of $15,630,418 has been segregated to cover margin requirements for the following open contracts as of December 31, 2016:
Description | Type | Expiration Date | Number of Contracts | Notional Value | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index E-Mini March Futures | Long | 3/17/17 | 69 | $ | 7,714,890 | $ | 14,306 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note March Futures | Long | 3/22/17 | 63 | 7,829,719 | (45,767 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (31,461 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investments in non-affiliates, at cost | $ | 514,226 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | 285,678,819 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at cost | $ | 286,193,045 | |||
|
| ||||
Investments in non-affiliates, at value | $ | 514,226 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at value | 297,114,026 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at value | $ | 297,628,252 | |||
Segregated cash for collateral | 15,630,418 | ||||
Interest and dividends receivable | 98 | ||||
Receivable for capital shares issued | 45,553 | ||||
Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | 591 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 1,564 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 313,306,476 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Cash overdraft | 483,152 | ||||
Payable for affiliated investments purchased | 27,204 | ||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 6,755 | ||||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | 783 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 25,634 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 4,695 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 1,087 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 854 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 648 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 10,698 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 561,510 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 312,744,966 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 285,884,391 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | 5,886,408 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | 9,570,421 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | 11,403,746 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 312,744,966 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 24,547,610 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 12.74 | |||
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | |||||
Dividends from affiliates | $ | 5,144,794 | |||
Dividends | 4,613 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Income | 5,149,407 | ||||
|
| ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Manager fees | 281,433 | ||||
Administration fees | 53,295 | ||||
Custodian fees | 2,057 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 4,710 | ||||
Trustee fees | 15,874 | ||||
Professional fees | 12,430 | ||||
Shareholder reports | 9,173 | ||||
Other expenses | 5,686 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total expenses | 384,658 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 4,764,749 | ||||
|
| ||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions from affiliates | (2,107,017 | ) | |||
Net realized gains distributions from affiliated underlying funds | 12,859,477 | ||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts | 496,993 | ||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 2,043,805 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 13,293,258 | ||||
|
| ||||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 18,058,007 | |||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||
Change In Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 4,764,749 | $ | 4,931,152 | ||||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | 11,249,453 | 3,095,730 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 2,043,805 | (9,371,354 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 18,058,007 | (1,344,472 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||
From net investment income | (6,185,785 | ) | (1,897,495 | ) | ||||||
From net realized gains | (2,024,582 | ) | (2,597,183 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | (8,210,367 | ) | (4,494,678 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 75,326,220 | 62,074,359 | ||||||||
Proceeds from dividends reinvested | 8,210,367 | 4,494,678 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (35,768,163 | ) | (14,219,428 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | 47,768,424 | 52,349,609 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | 57,616,064 | 46,510,459 | ||||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 255,128,902 | 208,618,443 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 312,744,966 | $ | 255,128,902 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | 5,886,408 | $ | 6,185,767 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 6,087,629 | 4,896,361 | ||||||||
Dividends reinvested | 654,213 | 368,416 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (2,934,307 | ) | (1,131,967 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | 3,807,535 | 4,132,810 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
Year Ended December 31, | January 10, 2012 (a) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 12.30 | $ | 12.56 | $ | 12.03 | $ | 10.69 | $ | 10.00 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Investment Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.17 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 0.64 | (0.25 | ) | 0.65 | 1 .24 | 0.77 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 0.81 | (0.03 | ) | 0.73 | 1 .34 | 0.85 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders From: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | (0.28 | ) | (0.10 | ) | (0.12 | ) | — | (0.14 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains | (0.09 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.08 | ) | — | (b) | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Dividends | (0.37 | ) | (0.23 | ) | (0.20 | ) | — | (b) | (0.16 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 12.74 | $ | 12.30 | $ | 12.56 | $ | 12.03 | $ | 10.69 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Return(c) | 6 .61 | % | (0.22 | )% | 6 .09 | % | 12 .56 | % | 8.50 | %(d) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 312,745 | $ | 255,129 | $ | 208,618 | $ | 155,547 | $ | 73,830 | |||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss)(e) | 1 .69 | % | 2 .08 | % | 0.97 | % | 1 .09 | % | 1 .41 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Before Reductions*(e)(f) | 0.14 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.39 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions*(e) | 0.14 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.21 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 11 | % | 5 | % | 6 | % | 4 | % | 11 | %(d) |
* | The expense ratios exclude the impact of fees/expenses paid by each underlying fund. |
(a) | Period from commencement of operations. During the period from January 10, 2012 to December 10, 2012, the Fund’s primary vehicle for gaining exposure to derivatives was through investments in its wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary, the AZL MVP BIS Investments Trust (the “Subsidiary”). The Subsidiary was liquidated on December 10, 2012 at its net asset value on such date. The Subsidiary’s operations have been consolidated with the operations of the Fund through its liquidation on December 10, 2012. |
(b) | Represents less than $0.005. |
(c) | The returns include reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but exclude insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(d) | Not annualized. |
(e) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(f) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
7
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services - Investment Companies. The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold and on foreign currency transactions are recorded on the basis of identified cost of the security lot sold with the net sales proceeds. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, reclassification of certain market discounts, gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust.
Derivative Instruments
All open derivative positions at period end are reflected on the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The following is a description of the derivative instruments utilized by the Fund, including the primary underlying risk exposures related to each instrument type. The Fund’s allocation to the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process may include (a) derivatives such as index futures, other futures contracts, options, and other similar securities and (b) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large redemptions and any margin calls. Due to the leverage provided by derivatives, the notional value of the Fund’s derivative positions could exceed 20% of the Fund’s value. The Fund may also use futures to gain equity exposure and may hold cash as a buffer in the event of market shocks.
8
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Futures Contracts
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund invested in futures contracts to reduce volatility and limit the need to decrease or increase allocations to underlying funds. Futures contracts are valued based upon their quoted daily settlement prices. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to segregate liquid assets in accordance with the initial margin requirements of the broker or exchange. Futures contracts are marked to market daily and a payable or receivable for the change in value (“variation margin”) is recorded by the Fund. Gains or losses are recognized but not considered realized until the contracts expire or are closed. Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock futures, interest rate risk related to bond futures, and foreign currency risk related to currency futures) and exposure to loss in excess of the variation margin disclosed in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between the change in fair value of the underlying securities and the prices of futures contracts, the possibility of an illiquid market, and the inability of the counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The notional amount of futures contracts outstanding was $15.5 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average notional amount for these contracts was $13.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Realized gains and losses are reported as “Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts” on the Statement of Operations.
Summary of Derivative Instruments
The following is a summary of the fair values of derivative instruments on the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, categorized by risk exposure, as of December 31, 2016:
Asset Derivative | Liability Derivative | |||||||||||
Primary Risk Exposure | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | ||||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | 14,306 | Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | — | ||||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | — | 45,767 |
* | For futures contracts, the amounts represent the cumulative appreciation/depreciation of these futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Portfolio Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as variation margin on futures contracts. |
The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations, categorized by risk exposure, for the year ended December 31, 2016:
Primary Risk Exposure | Location of Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized in Income | Realized Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized | Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized | |||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Net Realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts/Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | $ | 502,687 | $10,327 | ||||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | (5,694 | ) | (17,267) |
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018. Expenses incurred for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.”
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund | 0.10 | % | 0.20 | % |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.” At December 31, 2016, there were no remaining contractual reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years.
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the period can be found on the Statement of Operations. During year ended December 31, 2016, there were no voluntary waivers.
9
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | $ | 121,830,641 | $ | 43,013,816 | $ | (14,867,835 | ) | $ | 148,190,890 | $ | 2,676,691 | ||||||||||||||
AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 31,706,193 | 11,012,699 | (3,815,985 | ) | 38,458,535 | 923,271 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 18,971,382 | 7,317,022 | (2,932,205 | ) | 24,341,674 | 217,904 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL S&P 500 Index Fund, Class 2 | 59,684,175 | 19,717,178 | (7,181,697 | ) | 72,271,689 | 1,204,546 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund, Class 2 | 10,102,837 | 4,292,530 | (1,680,453 | ) | 13,851,238 | 122,382 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | 242,295,228 | $ | 85,353,245 | $ | (30,478,175 | ) | $ | 297,114,026 | $ | 5,144,794 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair values services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $2,833 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments in other investment companies are valued at their published net asset value (“NAV”). Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board” or “Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). The investments utilizing Level 1 valuations represent investments in open-end investment companies. Futures contracts are valued at the last sales price as of the close of the primary exchange and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
10
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Company | $ | 297,114,026 | $ | — | $ | 297,114,026 | |||||||||
Unaffiliated Investment Company | 514,226 | — | 514,226 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | 297,628,252 | — | 297,628,252 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments:* | |||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | (31,461 | ) | — | (31,461 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 297,596,791 | $ | — | $ | 297,596,791 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Other Financial Instruments would include any derivative instruments, such as futures contracts. These investments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the investment. |
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 85,353,245 | $ | 30,478,175 |
6. Investment Risks
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest directly or through affiliated or unaffiliated mutual funds or unregistered investment pools in derivative instruments such as futures, options, and options on futures. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The other party to a derivatives contract could default.
7. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
Cost of securities for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $288,606,341. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 15,686,539 | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (6,664,628 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | 9,021,911 | ||
|
|
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 6,185,785 | $ | 2,024,582 | $ | 8,210,367 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 2,234,539 | $ | 2,260,139 | $ | 4,494,678 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
11
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund | $ | 6,070,953 | $ | 11,767,711 | $ | — | $ | 9,021,911 | $ | 26,860,575 |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
8. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies - Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN - also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
9. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
12
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and transfer agents of the underlying funds. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
13
Other Federal Income Tax Information (Unaudited)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, 23.93% of the total ordinary income dividends paid by the Fund qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net long-term capital gain distributions of $2,024,582.
14
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (‘‘Commission’’) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
16
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
17
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. | |||||
Interested Trustees(3)
| ||||||||||
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
18
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 54 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 48 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without charge, by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197.
19
The Allianz VIP Fund of Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
AZL® MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
(formerly AZL® MVP BlackRock Global Allocation Fund)
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Consolidated Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 21
Consolidated Statement of Operations
Page 21
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 22
Consolidated Financial Highlights
Page 23
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Page 24
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 38
Other Federal Income Tax Information
Page 39
Other Information
Page 40
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 41
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 43
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL® MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund Review (unaudited)
(formerly AZL® MVP BlackRock Global Allocation Fund)
Allianz Investment Management LLC serves as the Manager for the AZL® MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund.
|
What factors affected the Fund’s performance for the year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL® MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund (the “Fund”) returned 3.34%. That compared to a 8.65%, 11.96%, 4.82%, 0.54%, 1.81% and a 5.22% total return for its benchmarks, the FTSE World Index1, the S&P 500 Index1, the FTSE World ex U.S. Index1, the BofA Merrill Lynch 5-Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index1, the Citigroup Non-USD World Government Bond Index1, and the Reference Benchmark1, respectively.
The Fund is a fund of funds that invests primarily in a combination of three underlying mutual funds (the “Underlying Funds”), which are managed by the Manager. The Fund is designed to provide a diversified portfolio consisting of Underlying Funds in equity and fixed income asset classes, combined with the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process intended to adjust the risk of the portfolio based on quantitative indicators of market risk, such as the current level of fund and market volatility.*
U.S. equity markets generally outperformed international equities for the 12-month period; the S&P 500 Index gained 11.96% while the FTSE World Ex US Index posted a more modest advance of 4.82%. These gains came despite a weak start to the year due to concerns about slowing global economic growth, particularly in China, and falling commodity prices. Markets rebounded in mid-February as China’s central banks announced stimulus measures and the Federal Reserve (the Fed) adopted a cautious tone on interest rates. Equity market gains were briefly interrupted in late June when the U.K. voted to leave the European Union, and again prior to the U.S. elections in November. However, domestic equities rallied strongly following the election of Donald Trump in anticipation of stronger economic growth.
In fixed-income markets, the year began with risk-averse investors driving credit spreads wider. As sentiment recovered in the middle of the first quarter, spreads narrowed once again, pushing volatility to its lowest level since August 2015. For much of the period, investors flocked to U.S. investment-grade bonds in search of yield amid historically low interest rates fueled in part by continued quantitative easing efforts by the European Central Bank and Bank of Japan. This shift drove up bond prices and further squeezed credit spreads. The victory of President Trump fueled inflation expectations. In this environment, the Fed decided to raise interest rates in December and strike a slightly more hawkish tone for 2017.
The Fund underperformed its reference benchmark for the 12-month period under review. A higher-than-benchmark exposure to Japanese stocks dragged on relative performance as that country’s equities underperformed. An underweight position to U.S. equities also detracted, as domestic stocks largely outperformed their international counterparts. Stock selection in the telecom services, utilities, real estate2 and consumer discretionary sectors also weighed on relative results. Other detractors included exposure to commodity-related securities. The Fund’s currency management strategy—particularly an underweight position to the Brazilian real, Japanese yen, and Canadian dollar—also detracted from relative performance.*
Within equities, the Fund’s relative performance benefited from lower-than-benchmark exposure to both financials and consumer staples stocks, which struggled for much of the period under review. Stock selection among financials also contributed to relative results. The Fund’s stock selection and overweight position in the energy sector added to relative performance, as that sector benefited from the rebound in oil prices that began midway through the first quarter.*
Among fixed income holdings, the Fund’s tilt toward corporate bonds contributed to relative returns; the sector outperformed for much of the period as credit spreads narrowed.*
The MVP risk management process, which includes the use of derivatives, worked as intended during the period under review and largely maintained a neutral equity allocation for most of the year relative to its target. There were two periods of volatility in 2016 during which the MVP process reduced the Fund’s equity exposure. In both instances, markets quickly recovered, and the MVP risk management process ultimately dragged on relative performance.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. | |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. | |
2 |
The performance of investments in real estate depends on the overall strength of the real estate market, the management of real estate investments trusts (REITs), real estate operating companies (REOCs), and foreign real estate companies, and property management, all of which can be affected by a variety of factors, including national and regional economic conditions. |
1
AZL® MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund Review (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek high total investment return. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing primarily a combination of Underlying Funds, which are managed by the manager, combined with the MVP risk management process. | ||
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in underlying funds, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of those underlying funds. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by each of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests. | ||
Returns on growth stocks may not move in tandem with returns on other categories of stocks or the market as a whole. Growth stocks may be susceptible to rapid price savings or to adverse developments in certain sectors of the market. | ||
Emerging market investing may be subject to additional economic, political, liquidity, and currency risks not associated with more developed countries. | ||
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations. | ||
Small- to mid-capitalization companies typically have a higher risk of failure and historically have experienced a greater degree of volatility. | ||
Mortgage-backed investments involve risk of loss due to prepayments and, like any bond, due to default. Because of the sensitivity of mortgage-related securities to changes in interest rates, the Fund’s performance may be more volatile than if it did not hold these securities. | ||
Debt securities held by the Fund may decline in value due to rising interest rates. Interest rates in the U.S. are at, or near, historic lows, which may increase the Fund’s exposure to risks related to rising rates. | ||
Investing in derivatives instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risk associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional instruments. | ||
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus. |
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark as well as the two component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||
Since Inception (1/10/12) | ||||||||||||
1 Year | 3 Year | |||||||||||
AZL® MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | 3.34 | % | 1.30 | % | 4.84 | % | ||||||
FTSE World Index | 8.65 | % | 3.93 | % | 9.94 | % | ||||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 8.87 | % | 14.10 | % | ||||||
FTSE World ex U.S. Index | 4.82 | % | -1.11 | % | 5.63 | % | ||||||
BofA Merrill Lynch 5-Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index | 0.54 | % | 1.65 | % | 0.96 | % | ||||||
Citigroup Non-U.S. Dollar World Government Bond Index | 1.81 | % | -2.18 | % | -1.78 | % | ||||||
Reference Benchmark | 5.22 | % | 2.62 | % | 5.37 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL® MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | 0.97 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.15% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the other investment companies. Accordingly, Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.67%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the FTSE World Index, which is a market-capitalization weighted index representing the performance of the large- and mid-capitalization stocks from the FTSE Global Equity Index Series and covers 90-95% of the investable market capitalization. The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which, are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The FTSE World ex U.S. Index is part of a range of indexes designed to help U.S. investors benchmark their international investments. The index is comprised of (84%) large- and (16%) mid-cap stocks providing coverage of Developed and Emerging Markets (46 countries) excluding the U.S. The index is derived from the FTSE Global Equity Index Series, which covers 98% of the world’s investable market capitalization. The BofA Merrill Lynch 5-Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index is designed to track the total return of the current coupon 5-Year U.S. Treasury bond. The Citigroup Non-U.S. Dollar World Government Bond Index is a market capitalization-weighted index that tracks 10 government bond indices, excluding the U.S. The Reference Benchmark is comprised of (30%) S&P 500; (20%) FTSE World ex U.S. Index; (30%) BofA Merrill Lynch 5-Year U.S. Treasury Bond; and (20%) Citigroup Non-U.S. Dollar World Government Bond. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,033.40 | $ | 5.37 | 1.04 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,019.91 | $ | 5.28 | 1.04 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Affiliated Investment Companies | 44.9 | % | |||
Common Stocks | 27.4 | ||||
U.S. Treasury Obligations | 7.7 | ||||
Foreign Bonds | 7.1 | ||||
Securities Held as Collateral for Securities on Loan | 2.2 | ||||
Corporate Bonds | 1.5 | ||||
Exchange Traded Funds | 1.4 | ||||
Yankee Dollars | 1.4 | ||||
Money Markets | 1.0 | ||||
Preferred Stocks | 0.9 | ||||
Bank Loans | 0.6 | ||||
Convertible Bonds | 0.5 | ||||
Purchased Options | 0.5 | ||||
U.S. Government Agency Mortgages | 0.3 | ||||
Convertible Preferred Stocks | 0.2 | ||||
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | 0.1 | ||||
Mutual Funds | 0.1 | ||||
Purchased Swaptions | — | ^ | |||
Private Placements | — | ^ | |||
Warrants | — | ^ | |||
Rights | — | ^ | |||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 97.8 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | 2.2 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
^ | Represents less than 0.05% |
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
United States | 75.1 | % | |||
Japan | 8.3 | ||||
United Kingdom | 2.2 | ||||
France | 1.4 | ||||
Germany | 1.2 | ||||
Canada | 1.2 | ||||
Netherlands | 1.0 | ||||
Australia | 0.8 | ||||
India | 0.5 | ||||
Italy | 0.5 | ||||
All other countries | 5.6 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 97.8 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | 2.2 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
3
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Common Stocks (27.4%): | ||||||||
Aerospace & Defense (0.6%): | ||||||||
149,433 | BAE Systems plc | $ | 1,085,029 | |||||
382 | Boeing Co. (The) | 59,470 | ||||||
530 | Dassault Aviation SA | 591,292 | ||||||
21,926 | European Aeronautic Defence & Space Co. NV | 1,446,877 | ||||||
493 | General Dynamics Corp. | 85,121 | ||||||
3,382 | Hexcel Corp.^ | 173,971 | ||||||
42,667 | Meggitt plc | 240,906 | ||||||
349 | Northrop Grumman Corp. | 81,170 | ||||||
398 | Raytheon Co. | 56,516 | ||||||
19,213 | Safran SA | 1,383,087 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
5,203,439 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Airlines (0.6%): | ||||||||
20,251 | Delta Air Lines, Inc. | 996,147 | ||||||
41,500 | Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. | 1,211,172 | ||||||
20,195 | Southwest Airlines Co. | 1,006,519 | ||||||
24,735 | United Continental Holdings, Inc.* | 1,802,686 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
5,016,524 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Auto Components (0.5%): | ||||||||
9,700 | Aisin Sieki Co., Ltd. | 419,832 | ||||||
16,600 | Bridgestone Corp. | 597,214 | ||||||
95,683 | Cheng Shin Rubber Industry Co., Ltd. | 179,910 | ||||||
21,500 | Denso Corp. | 928,896 | ||||||
1,800 | Exedy Corp. | 50,563 | ||||||
13,400 | Futaba Industrial Co., Ltd. | 78,150 | ||||||
1,317 | Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.^ | 40,656 | ||||||
5,300 | Koito Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 279,903 | ||||||
956 | Lear Corp. | 126,546 | ||||||
3,800 | Stanley Electric Co., Ltd. | 103,593 | ||||||
30,500 | Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. | 437,993 | ||||||
23,000 | Toyota Industries Corp. | 1,092,453 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4,335,709 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Automobiles (0.6%): | ||||||||
158,000 | Brilliance China Automotive Holdings, Ltd. | 216,861 | ||||||
47,720 | Ford Motor Co. | 578,844 | ||||||
31,600 | Fuji Heavy Industries, Ltd. | 1,285,535 | ||||||
2,258 | Hero MotoCorp, Ltd. | 100,896 | ||||||
17,800 | Honda Motor Co., Ltd. | 518,281 | ||||||
4,381 | Hyundai Motor Co. | 526,433 | ||||||
9,300 | Isuzu Motors, Ltd. | 117,420 | ||||||
3,683 | Maruti Suzuki India, Ltd. | 286,925 | ||||||
37,100 | Suzuki Motor Corp. | 1,302,484 | ||||||
4,100 | Toyota Motor Corp. | 239,387 | ||||||
144 | Volkswagen AG | 20,679 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
5,193,745 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Banks (2.2%): | ||||||||
60,829 | Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA | 410,313 | ||||||
109,951 | Banco Santander SA | 573,887 | ||||||
137,809 | Bank of America Corp. | 3,045,579 | ||||||
12,581 | BNP Paribas SA | 801,312 | ||||||
30,626 | Citigroup, Inc. | 1,820,103 |
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Common Stocks, continued | ||||||||
Banks, continued | ||||||||
1,328 | Fifth Third Bancorp^ | $ | 35,816 | |||||
206,417 | HSBC Holdings plc | 1,668,733 | ||||||
66,782 | ING Groep NV | 939,682 | ||||||
29,178 | JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 2,517,770 | ||||||
115,400 | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 709,566 | ||||||
38,200 | Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. | 1,448,350 | ||||||
11,507 | SunTrust Banks, Inc. | 631,159 | ||||||
50,560 | Svenska Handelsbanken AB, Class A | 702,799 | ||||||
13,358 | Toronto-Dominion Bank (The) | 658,895 | ||||||
17,783 | Wells Fargo & Co. | 980,021 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
16,943,985 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Beverages (0.4%): | ||||||||
12,737 | Anheuser-Busch InBev NV | 1,344,922 | ||||||
13,900 | Asahi Breweries, Ltd. | 438,318 | ||||||
477 | Constellation Brands, Inc., Class C | 73,129 | ||||||
6,820 | Diageo plc, ADR^ | 708,871 | ||||||
1,475 | PepsiCo, Inc. | 154,329 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,719,569 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Biotechnology (0.5%): | ||||||||
983 | AbbVie, Inc. | 61,555 | ||||||
2,834 | Amgen, Inc. | 414,359 | ||||||
1,599 | Biogen Idec, Inc.* | 453,444 | ||||||
28,639 | Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 2,050,840 | ||||||
15,263 | Invitae Corp.* | 121,188 | ||||||
16,063 | Shire plc | 910,077 | ||||||
2,812 | Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 207,160 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4,218,623 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Building Products (0.3%): | ||||||||
12,025 | Compagnie de Saint-Gobain SA | 559,880 | ||||||
4,900 | Daikin Industries, Ltd. | 448,798 | ||||||
8,066 | Fortune Brands Home & Security, Inc.^ | 431,208 | ||||||
16,733 | Masco Corp. | 529,098 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,968,984 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Capital Markets (0.5%): | ||||||||
503 | Ameriprise Financial, Inc. | 55,803 | ||||||
762 | Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (The) | 36,104 | ||||||
1,070 | Brookfield Asset Management, Inc., Class A | 35,308 | ||||||
20,018 | Charles Schwab Corp. (The) | 790,110 | ||||||
533 | CME Group, Inc. | 61,482 | ||||||
19,000 | Daiwa Securities Group, Inc. | 116,733 | ||||||
5,239 | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The) | 1,254,478 | ||||||
26,170 | Morgan Stanley | 1,105,682 | ||||||
34,837 | UBS Group AG | 545,532 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4,001,232 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Chemicals (1.3%): | ||||||||
8,422 | Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. | 1,211,252 | ||||||
11,287 | AkzoNobel NV | 704,788 | ||||||
2,657 | Arkema SA | 259,535 | ||||||
55,000 | Asahi Kasei Corp. | 478,896 | ||||||
46,960 | Axalta Coating Systems, Ltd.* | 1,277,312 |
Continued
4
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Common Stocks, continued | ||||||||
Chemicals, continued | ||||||||
6,032 | BASF SE | $ | 562,469 | |||||
21,823 | E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. | 1,601,808 | ||||||
11,250 | Evonik Industries AG | 334,919 | ||||||
20,000 | Formosa Chemicals & Fibre Corp. | 59,545 | ||||||
22,000 | Formosa Plastics Corp. | 60,712 | ||||||
16,200 | Hitachi Chemical Co., Ltd. | 404,310 | ||||||
342 | LG Chem, Ltd. | 73,758 | ||||||
28,000 | Nan Ya Plastics Corp. | 61,699 | ||||||
8,400 | Nitto Denko Corp. | 643,262 | ||||||
47,800 | PTT Global Chemical Public Co., Ltd. | 83,768 | ||||||
772 | Sherwin Williams Co. | 207,467 | ||||||
19,700 | Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd. | 1,518,486 | ||||||
54,000 | Toray Industries, Inc. | 436,510 | ||||||
150,000 | Ube Industries, Ltd. | 313,718 | ||||||
5,429 | Umicore SA | 308,969 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
10,603,182 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies (0.0%): | ||||||||
1,700 | SECOM Co., Ltd. | 124,074 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Communications Equipment (0.3%): | ||||||||
1,583 | Cisco Systems, Inc. | 47,838 | ||||||
31,923 | CommScope Holding Co., Inc.* | 1,187,536 | ||||||
210,228 | Nokia OYJ | 1,010,887 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,246,261 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Construction & Engineering (0.2%): | ||||||||
12,000 | Chiyoda Corp. | 82,959 | ||||||
4,700 | ComSys Holdings Corp. | 85,968 | ||||||
11,100 | JGC Corp. | 201,021 | ||||||
10,800 | Kinden Corp. | 134,331 | ||||||
3,000 | Maeda Road Construction Co., Ltd. | 50,106 | ||||||
4,000 | Nippo Corp. | 74,562 | ||||||
42,000 | Okumura Corp. | 235,965 | ||||||
1,000 | Sho-Bond Holdings Co., Ltd.^ | 41,572 | ||||||
44,000 | Toda Corp. | 231,796 | ||||||
7,084 | Vinci SA | 481,778 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,620,058 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Construction Materials (0.0%): | ||||||||
12,200 | The Siam Cement Public Co., Ltd. | 168,719 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Consumer Finance (0.1%): | ||||||||
997 | Capital One Financial Corp. | 86,978 | ||||||
10,825 | Discover Financial Services | 780,375 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
867,353 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Containers & Packaging (0.1%): | ||||||||
1,028 | Crown Holdings, Inc.* | 54,042 | ||||||
1,425 | International Paper Co. | 75,611 | ||||||
893 | Packaging Corp. of America | 75,744 | ||||||
12,496 | WestRock Co. | 634,422 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
839,819 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Distributors (0.0%): | ||||||||
3,700 | Canon Marketing Japan, Inc. | 62,146 | ||||||
|
|
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Common Stocks, continued | ||||||||
Diversified Consumer Services (0.0%): | ||||||||
15,078 | H&R Block, Inc.^ | $ | 346,643 | |||||
|
| |||||||
Diversified Financial Services (0.4%): | ||||||||
6 | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Class A* | 1,464,726 | ||||||
9,090 | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Class B* | 1,481,488 | ||||||
65,000 | Fubon Financial Holdings Co., Ltd. | 102,989 | ||||||
2,400 | Zenkoku Hosho Co., Ltd. | 77,025 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
3,126,228 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Diversified Telecommunication Services (0.5%): | ||||||||
42,356 | Cellnex Telecom SAU | 608,224 | ||||||
31,000 | Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. | 97,812 | ||||||
54,167 | Deutsche Telekom AG, Registered Shares | 930,435 | ||||||
13,794 | El Towers SpA* | 743,086 | ||||||
58,000 | HKT Trust & HKT, Ltd. | 70,987 | ||||||
13,000 | Nippon Telegraph & Telephone Corp. | 546,535 | ||||||
37,600 | Singapore Telecommunications, Ltd. | 94,384 | ||||||
1,134,637 | Telecom Italia SpA* | 998,874 | ||||||
32,883 | Telecom Italia SpA | 23,763 | ||||||
3,876 | Verizon Communications, Inc. | 206,901 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4,321,001 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Electric Utilities (0.3%): | ||||||||
4,352 | CEZ | 72,863 | ||||||
9,000 | Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings, Ltd. | 71,585 | ||||||
17,700 | Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. | 246,940 | ||||||
10,500 | CLP Holdings, Ltd. | 95,947 | ||||||
145,084 | Enel SpA | 638,368 | ||||||
8,500 | Hongkong Electric Holdings, Ltd. | 74,888 | ||||||
14,009 | NextEra Energy, Inc. | 1,673,515 | ||||||
4,133 | Vistra Energy Corp.^ | 64,062 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,938,168 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Electrical Equipment (0.2%): | ||||||||
42,000 | GS Yuasa Corp. | 174,297 | ||||||
2,300 | Mabuchi Motor Co., Ltd. | 119,458 | ||||||
89,100 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp. | 1,238,792 | ||||||
364 | Rockwell Automation, Inc. | 48,922 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,581,469 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components (0.3%): | ||||||||
36,188 | Fitbit, Inc., Class A*^ | 264,896 | ||||||
800 | Hirose Electric Co., Ltd. | 98,942 | ||||||
43,400 | Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. | 112,442 | ||||||
500 | Keyence Corp. | 342,633 | ||||||
3,800 | Kyocera Corp. | 188,501 | ||||||
6,900 | Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 918,971 | ||||||
29,763 | VeriFone Systems, Inc.*^ | 527,698 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,454,083 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Energy Equipment & Services (0.1%): | ||||||||
788 | Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 60,991 | ||||||
7,741 | Schlumberger, Ltd.^ | 649,857 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
710,848 | ||||||||
|
|
Continued
5
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Common Stocks, continued |
| ||||||
| Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (0.4%): |
| ||||||
1,288 | American Tower Corp. | $ | 136,116 | |||||
7,206 | Crown Castle International Corp. | 625,265 | ||||||
189,350 | Fibra UNO Amdinistracion SA | 289,486 | ||||||
8,000 | Link REIT (The) | 51,663 | ||||||
7,207 | Simon Property Group, Inc. | 1,280,467 | ||||||
1,766 | Unibail-Rodamco SE | 420,916 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,803,913 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Food & Staples Retailing (0.3%): |
| ||||||
7,003 | CVS Health Corp. | 552,607 | ||||||
15,000 | Seven & I Holdings Co., Ltd. | 570,916 | ||||||
6,104 | Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. | 505,167 | ||||||
28,136 | Whole Foods Market, Inc.^ | 865,463 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,494,153 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Food Products (0.5%): |
| ||||||
37,500 | Ajinomoto Co., Inc. | 754,306 | ||||||
25,960 | Danone SA | 1,642,910 | ||||||
5,590 | Mead Johnson Nutrition Co. | 395,549 | ||||||
3,116 | Mondelez International, Inc., Class A | 138,132 | ||||||
33,335 | Nestle SA, Registered Shares | 2,391,694 | ||||||
690 | Tyson Foods, Inc., Class A | 42,559 | ||||||
44,000 | Uni-President Enterprises Corp. | 72,646 | ||||||
89,000 | Want Want China Holdings, Ltd.^ | 56,881 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
5,494,677 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Gas Utilities (0.1%): |
| ||||||
13,556 | Gas Natural SDG SA | 255,338 | ||||||
2,641 | Italgas SpA* | 10,390 | ||||||
176,000 | Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd. | 794,605 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,060,333 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Health Care Equipment & Supplies (0.4%): |
| ||||||
14,560 | Baxter International, Inc. | 645,590 | ||||||
27,800 | HOYA Corp. | 1,165,297 | ||||||
2,377 | Medtronic plc | 169,314 | ||||||
403 | Stryker Corp.^ | 48,283 | ||||||
12,768 | Zimmer Holdings, Inc. | 1,317,658 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
3,346,142 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Health Care Providers & Services (0.9%): |
| ||||||
13,395 | Aetna, Inc. | 1,661,113 | ||||||
4,600 | Alfresa Holdings Corp. | 75,848 | ||||||
8,497 | Anthem, Inc. | 1,221,613 | ||||||
33,609 | Brookdale Senior Living, Inc.*^ | 417,424 | ||||||
1,042 | Cardinal Health, Inc. | 74,993 | ||||||
8,059 | Centene Corp.* | 455,414 | ||||||
11,606 | HCA Holdings, Inc.* | 859,076 | ||||||
330 | McKesson Corp. | 46,349 | ||||||
5,300 | Medipal Holdings Corp. | 83,221 | ||||||
39,182 | NMC Health plc | 743,920 | ||||||
482,998 | PT Siloam International Hospital Tbk* | 390,772 | ||||||
103,489 | Spire Healthcare Group plc | 429,803 | ||||||
2,200 | Suzuken Co., Ltd. | 71,770 | ||||||
35,378 | Tenet Healthcare Corp.* | 525,010 |
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Common Stocks, continued |
| ||||||
| Health Care Providers & Services, continued |
| ||||||
449 | UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | $ | 71,858 | |||||
|
| |||||||
7,128,184 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure (0.3%): |
| ||||||
12,770 | Accor SA | 476,011 | ||||||
2,997 | Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.*^ | 1,130,828 | ||||||
665 | McDonald’s Corp. | 80,944 | ||||||
6,452 | Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Ltd.*^ | 274,404 | ||||||
8,397 | Starbucks Corp. | 466,201 | ||||||
877 | Wyndham Worldwide Corp. | 66,976 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,495,364 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Household Durables (0.1%): |
| ||||||
3,000 | Alpine Electronics, Inc. | 38,875 | ||||||
11,726 | Berkeley Group Holdings plc (The) | 405,252 | ||||||
1,262 | Coway Co., Ltd. | 92,187 | ||||||
2,639 | Mohawk Industries, Inc.* | 526,956 | ||||||
2,700 | Rinnai Corp. | 217,528 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,280,798 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Household Products (0.1%): |
| ||||||
1,859 | Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 121,653 | ||||||
5,377 | Kimberly-Clark Corp. | 613,624 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
735,277 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Independent Power & Renewable Electricity Producers (0.0%): |
| ||||||
13,439 | NextEra Energy Partners LP | 343,232 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Industrial Conglomerates (0.5%): |
| ||||||
308 | 3M Co., Class C | 55,000 | ||||||
8,500 | CK Hutchison Holdings, Ltd. | 95,962 | ||||||
1,300 | Jardine Matheson Holdings, Ltd. | 71,712 | ||||||
36,543 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV | 1,113,707 | ||||||
6,778 | Roper Industries, Inc.^ | 1,240,916 | ||||||
4,446 | Siemens AG, Registered Shares | 546,432 | ||||||
24,066 | Smiths Group plc | 417,987 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
3,541,716 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Insurance (1.0%): |
| ||||||
75,000 | AIA Group, Ltd. | 419,742 | ||||||
12,790 | Allstate Corp. (The) | 947,994 | ||||||
615 | American International Group, Inc. | 40,166 | ||||||
23,743 | AXA SA | 599,042 | �� | |||||
1,057 | Axis Capital Holdings, Ltd. | 68,990 | ||||||
65,289 | Cathay Financial Holding Co., Ltd. | 97,773 | ||||||
6,959 | Chubb, Ltd. | 919,423 | ||||||
742 | Fairfax Financial Holdings, Ltd. | 358,426 | ||||||
2,372 | Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. (The) | 113,026 | ||||||
11,704 | Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc. | 791,073 | ||||||
13,950 | MetLife, Inc. | 751,766 | ||||||
10,700 | MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc. | 330,636 | ||||||
21,600 | NKSJ Holdings, Inc. | 729,464 | ||||||
719 | Prudential Financial, Inc. | 74,819 | ||||||
612 | Reinsurance Group of America, Inc. | 77,008 | ||||||
20,900 | Sony Financial Holdings, Inc. | 323,990 |
Continued
6
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Common Stocks, continued |
| ||||||
| Insurance, continued |
| ||||||
20,400 | Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. | $ | 834,273 | |||||
1,235 | Travelers Cos., Inc. (The) | 151,189 | ||||||
9,783 | UnumProvident Corp. | 429,767 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
8,058,567 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Internet & Direct Marketing Retail (0.4%): |
| ||||||
4,020 | Amazon.com, Inc.* | 3,014,477 | ||||||
4,221 | Expedia, Inc. | 478,155 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
3,492,632 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Internet Software & Services (1.2%): |
| ||||||
13,587 | Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd., ADR*^ | 1,193,074 | ||||||
5,373 | Alphabet, Inc., Class C* | 4,146,989 | ||||||
95,700 | Dropbox, Inc.*(a)(b) | 1,042,173 | ||||||
27,248 | Facebook, Inc., Class A* | 3,134,882 | ||||||
5,547 | Lookout, Inc.*(a)(b) | 30,786 | ||||||
982 | VeriSign, Inc.*^ | 74,701 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
9,622,605 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| IT Services (0.5%): |
| ||||||
905 | Accenture plc, Class C | 106,003 | ||||||
246 | Alliance Data Systems Corp. | 56,211 | ||||||
1,418 | Amdocs, Ltd. | 82,599 | ||||||
11,975 | Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., Class A* | 670,959 | ||||||
1,326 | Computer Sciences Corp. | 78,791 | ||||||
7,572 | Global Payments, Inc. | 525,573 | ||||||
37,607 | Infosys, Ltd. | 559,201 | ||||||
6,707 | MasterCard, Inc., Class A | 692,498 | ||||||
21,172 | Sabre Corp.^ | 528,241 | ||||||
29,557 | Square, Inc., Class A*^ | 402,862 | ||||||
7,868 | Visa, Inc., Class A | 613,861 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4,316,799 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Leisure Products (0.0%): |
| ||||||
3,100 | Yamaha Corp. | 94,488 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Life Sciences Tools & Services (0.0%): |
| ||||||
11,156 | Patheon NV*^ | 320,289 | ||||||
904 | Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. | 127,554 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
447,843 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Machinery (0.6%): |
| ||||||
21,659 | Doosan Bobcat, Inc.* | 642,991 | ||||||
11,408 | GEA Group AG | 457,205 | ||||||
104,090 | Haitian International Holdings, Ltd. | 202,911 | ||||||
8,100 | Hino Motors, Ltd. | 82,209 | ||||||
417 | Illinois Tool Works, Inc. | 51,065 | ||||||
26,300 | Komatsu, Ltd. | 593,698 | ||||||
30,800 | Kubota Corp. | 438,517 | ||||||
3,300 | Kurita Water Industries, Ltd. | 72,501 | ||||||
1,300 | Makita Corp. | 86,975 | ||||||
3,400 | Nabtesco Corp. | 78,943 | ||||||
82,098 | SKF AB, Class B | 1,507,613 | ||||||
444 | WABCO Holdings, Inc.* | 47,131 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4,261,759 | ||||||||
|
|
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Common Stocks, continued |
| ||||||
| Media (0.9%): |
| ||||||
2,542 | Charter Communications, Inc., Class A* | $ | 731,893 | |||||
28,344 | Comcast Corp., Class A | 1,957,152 | ||||||
615,711 | Delta Topco, Ltd.*(a)(b) | 30,786 | ||||||
10,520 | DISH Network Corp., Class A* | 609,424 | ||||||
2,903 | Liberty Broadband Corp., Class A* | 210,351 | ||||||
5,632 | Liberty Broadband Corp., Class C*^ | 417,162 | ||||||
9,071 | Liberty Global plc, Class A* | 277,482 | ||||||
10,623 | Liberty SiriusXM Group, Class A* | 366,706 | ||||||
19,918 | Liberty SiriusXM Group, Class C* | 675,619 | ||||||
5,500 | Nippon Television Holdings, Inc. | 99,703 | ||||||
432 | Omnicom Group, Inc.^ | 36,768 | ||||||
41,172 | Pearson plc | 413,119 | ||||||
8,173 | Publicis Groupe SA | 563,738 | ||||||
68,858 | RAI Way SpA^ | 259,449 | ||||||
561 | Scripps Networks Interactive, Class C^ | 40,039 | ||||||
8,600 | SKY Perfect JSAT Holdings, Inc. | 39,520 | ||||||
3,500 | Toho Co., Ltd. | 98,926 | ||||||
3,100 | TV Asahi Holdings Corp. | 61,116 | ||||||
37,820 | Zon Multimedia Servicos de Telecommunicacoes e Multimedia SGPS SA | 224,374 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
7,113,327 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Metals & Mining (0.0%): |
| ||||||
17,183 | Platinum Group Metals, Ltd.* | 24,831 | ||||||
81,742 | Platinum Group Metals, Ltd.* | 116,891 | ||||||
462 | POSCO | 97,677 | ||||||
5,800 | Tokyo Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 44,426 | ||||||
2,300 | Yamato Kogyo Co., Ltd. | 63,799 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
347,624 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Multiline Retail (0.1%): |
| ||||||
10,918 | Target Corp. | 788,607 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Multi-Utilities (0.2%): |
| ||||||
35,663 | Innogy Se* | 1,239,787 | ||||||
4,211 | National Grid plc | 49,241 | ||||||
7,685 | Sempra Energy | 773,418 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,062,446 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels (2.4%): |
| ||||||
34,884 | Anadarko Petroleum Corp. | 2,432,461 | ||||||
38,452 | BP plc, ADR | 1,437,335 | ||||||
19,672 | BP plc | 122,212 | ||||||
19,757 | Cenovus Energy, Inc. | 298,746 | ||||||
284 | Chevron Corp. | 33,427 | ||||||
94,227 | Coal India, Ltd. | 415,935 | ||||||
101,639 | EnCana Corp.^ | 1,193,242 | ||||||
7,645 | EQT Corp. | 499,983 | ||||||
16,000 | Formosa Petrochemical Corp. | 55,385 | ||||||
77,100 | INPEX Corp. | 769,840 | ||||||
73,962 | Marathon Oil Corp. | 1,280,282 | ||||||
68,545 | Marathon Petroleum Corp. | 3,451,241 | ||||||
32,131 | Oil & Natural Gas Corp., Ltd. | 90,520 | ||||||
778 | Phillips 66 | 67,227 |
Continued
7
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Common Stocks, continued |
| ||||||
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels, continued |
| ||||||
98,439 | Reliance Industries, Ltd. | $ | 1,567,944 | |||||
37,124 | Royal Dutch Shell plc, ADR | 2,018,802 | ||||||
11,288 | Royal Dutch Shell plc, Class A | 306,785 | ||||||
14,022 | Snam SpA | 57,669 | ||||||
27,800 | Thai Oil Public Co., Ltd. | 55,953 | ||||||
862 | Total SA, ADR | 43,936 | ||||||
18,499 | Total SA | 944,196 | ||||||
1,620 | Valero Energy Corp. | 110,678 | ||||||
23,284 | Williams Cos., Inc. (The) | 725,064 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
17,978,863 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Personal Products (0.4%): |
| ||||||
19,489 | Edgewell Personal Care Co.*^ | 1,422,502 | ||||||
42,167 | Unilever NV | 1,732,797 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
3,155,299 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Pharmaceuticals (1.4%): |
| ||||||
5,500 | Astellas Pharma, Inc. | 76,246 | ||||||
20,930 | AstraZeneca plc | 1,134,914 | ||||||
4,909 | Bayer AG, Registered Shares | 512,062 | ||||||
16,132 | Catalent, Inc.* | 434,919 | ||||||
30,058 | GlaxoSmithKline plc | 573,927 | ||||||
11,716 | Johnson & Johnson Co. | 1,349,800 | ||||||
8,433 | Merck & Co., Inc. | 496,451 | ||||||
22,669 | Mylan NV* | 864,822 | ||||||
6,357 | Novartis AG, Registered Shares | 462,536 | ||||||
3,100 | Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd. | 134,896 | ||||||
14,609 | Perrigo Co. plc^ | 1,215,907 | ||||||
71,983 | Pfizer, Inc. | 2,338,008 | ||||||
12,350 | Sanofi-Aventis SA | 998,673 | ||||||
1,500 | Sawai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | 80,423 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
10,673,584 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Professional Services (0.1%): |
| ||||||
9,235 | Randstad Holding NV | 500,119 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Real Estate Management & Development (0.9%): |
| ||||||
505,700 | CapitaLand, Ltd. | 1,050,698 | ||||||
630,200 | Global Logistic Properties, Ltd. | 954,936 | ||||||
20,000 | Hang Lung Properties, Ltd. | 41,879 | ||||||
68,000 | Mitsubishi Estate Co., Ltd. | 1,348,111 | ||||||
38,000 | Sino Land Co., Ltd. | 56,250 | ||||||
72,666 | Sun Hung Kai Properties, Ltd. | 909,834 | ||||||
6,500 | Swire Pacific, Ltd., Class A | 62,051 | ||||||
49,034 | The St. Joe Co.*^ | 931,646 | ||||||
14,940 | Vonovia SE | 486,582 | ||||||
13,000 | Wharf Holdings, Ltd. (The) | 85,435 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
5,927,422 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Road & Rail (0.4%): |
| ||||||
39,900 | ComfortDelGro Corp., Ltd. | 67,795 | ||||||
16,600 | East Japan Railway Co. | 1,432,138 | ||||||
12,738 | Kansas City Southern | 1,080,819 | ||||||
10,200 | Kyushu Railway Co.* | 266,385 | ||||||
5,700 | Seino Holdings Co., Ltd. | 63,172 |
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Common Stocks, continued |
| ||||||
| Road & Rail, continued |
| ||||||
7,000 | West Japan Railway Co. | $ | 429,011 | |||||
|
| |||||||
3,339,320 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment (0.2%): |
| ||||||
1,835 | Intel Corp. | 66,555 | ||||||
734 | KLA-Tencor Corp. | 57,751 | ||||||
15,183 | QUALCOMM, Inc. | 989,932 | ||||||
10,000 | ROHM Co., Ltd. | 573,963 | ||||||
11,094 | SK Hynix, Inc. | 405,589 | ||||||
27,800 | SUMCO Corp. | 357,209 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,450,999 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Software (0.9%): |
| ||||||
685 | Adobe Systems, Inc.* | 70,521 | ||||||
7,228 | Electronic Arts, Inc.* | 569,277 | ||||||
5,202 | Intuit, Inc. | 596,201 | ||||||
2,297 | Microsoft Corp. | 142,736 | ||||||
3,000 | Nintendo Co., Ltd. | 627,217 | ||||||
37,810 | Nuance Communications, Inc.* | 563,369 | ||||||
4,400 | Trend Micro, Inc. | 156,061 | ||||||
68,532 | Uber Technologies, Inc.*(a)(b) | 3,386,166 | ||||||
12,536 | UbiSoft Entertainment SA* | 445,899 | ||||||
6,208 | VMware, Inc., Class A*^ | 488,756 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
7,046,203 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Specialty Retail (0.6%): |
| ||||||
12,924 | Bed Bath & Beyond, Inc.^ | 525,231 | ||||||
626 | Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc. | 33,241 | ||||||
4,788 | Home Depot, Inc. (The) | 641,975 | ||||||
23,537 | Lowe’s Cos., Inc. | 1,673,951 | ||||||
1,100 | Shimamura Co., Ltd. | 137,254 | ||||||
5,288 | Tiffany & Co.^ | 409,450 | ||||||
13,008 | Williams-Sonoma, Inc.^ | 629,457 | ||||||
65,200 | Yamada Denki Co., Ltd. | 350,727 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
4,401,286 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals (1.0%): |
| ||||||
58,767 | Apple, Inc.(c) | 6,806,394 | ||||||
3,000 | Fujifilm Holdings Corp. | 113,684 | ||||||
130,000 | NEC Corp. | 343,476 | ||||||
36,155 | Pure Storage, Inc., Class A*^ | 408,913 | ||||||
1,580 | Western Digital Corp. | 107,361 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
7,779,828 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
| Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods (0.3%): |
| ||||||
4,821 | Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA | 319,301 | ||||||
5,565 | Hugo Boss AG | 343,333 | ||||||
11,588 | Luxottica Group SpA | 624,075 | ||||||
3,259 | LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA | 621,328 | ||||||
16,220 | Michael Kors Holdings, Ltd.*^ | 697,136 | ||||||
406 | PVH Corp. | 36,637 | ||||||
3,093 | Ralph Lauren Corp.^ | 279,360 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,921,170 | ||||||||
|
|
Continued
8
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Common Stocks, continued | ||||||||
Tobacco (0.0%): | ||||||||
1,451 | Altria Group, Inc. | $ | 98,117 | |||||
3,300 | Japan Tobacco, Inc. | 108,430 | ||||||
963 | KT&G Corp. | 80,505 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
287,052 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors (0.0%): | ||||||||
6,751 | HD Supply Holdings, Inc.* | 286,985 | ||||||
574 | United Rentals, Inc.* | 60,603 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
347,588 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Transportation Infrastructure (0.0%): | ||||||||
8,000 | Kamigumi Co., Ltd. | 76,127 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services (0.5%): | ||||||||
23,500 | Advanced Information Service plc | 96,192 | ||||||
1,777 | China Mobile, Ltd., ADR | 93,168 | ||||||
40,000 | Far EasTone Telecommunications Co., Ltd. | 89,931 | ||||||
52,700 | Intouch Holdings Public Co., Ltd. | 73,150 | ||||||
13,900 | KDDI Corp. | 350,991 | ||||||
10,200 | NTT DoCoMo, Inc. | 231,985 | ||||||
405 | SK Telecom Co., Ltd. | 75,361 | ||||||
33,000 | Taiwan Mobile Co., Ltd. | 106,386 | ||||||
22,277 | Vodafone Group plc, ADR | 544,227 | ||||||
595,287 | Vodafone Group plc | 1,463,851 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
3,125,242 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Common Stocks (Cost $198,175,651) | 222,952,452 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Preferred Stocks (0.9%): | ||||||||
Automobiles (0.1%): | ||||||||
3,540 | Volkswagen AG, 0.13% | 495,891 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Banks (0.1%): | ||||||||
12,428 | Citigroup Capital XIII, Series A, 7.41%^ | 320,892 | ||||||
2,611 | U.S. Bancorp, Series G, 6.00% | 65,823 | ||||||
7,094 | U.S. Bancorp, Series F, 6.50% | 200,689 | ||||||
84,000 | USB Capital IX, 3.50% | 68,985 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
656,389 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies (0.0%): | ||||||||
3,136 | Stericycle, Inc., 5.25%^ | 198,415 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Consumer Finance (0.1%): | ||||||||
16,911 | GMAC Capital Trust I, Series 2, 6.85% | 429,539 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (0.1%): | ||||||||
1,639 | American Tower Corp., Series A, 5.25% | 171,685 | ||||||
6,282 | Welltower, Inc., Series I, 6.50% | 378,051 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
549,736 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Health Care Providers & Services (0.1%): | ||||||||
19,771 | Anthem, Inc., 5.25% | 929,829 | ||||||
143,925 | Grand Rounds, Inc., Series C*(a)(b) | 395,794 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,325,623 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Internet Software & Services (0.1%): | ||||||||
63,925 | Lookout, Inc., Series F*(a)(b) | 613,680 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Multi-Utilities (0.1%): | ||||||||
13,401 | Dominion Resources, Inc., 6.75% | 678,091 | ||||||
|
|
Contracts, Notional Amount or Principal Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
Preferred Stocks, continued | ||||||||
Pharmaceuticals (0.2%): | ||||||||
867 | Allergan plc, Series A, 5.50% | $ | 661,053 | |||||
1,410 | Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., 7.00% | 909,450 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,570,503 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Software (0.0%): | ||||||||
116,157 | Palantir Technologies, Inc., Series I*(a)(b) | 939,710 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Preferred Stocks (Cost $7,793,069) | 7,457,577 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Warrant (0.0%): | ||||||||
Paper & Forest Products (0.0%): | ||||||||
157,250 | TFS Corp., Ltd. | 50,365 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Warrant (Cost $–) | 50,365 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Convertible Preferred Stocks (0.2%): | ||||||||
Banks (0.0%): | ||||||||
131 | Wells Fargo & Co., Series L, Class A, 7.50% | 155,890 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Internet Software & Services (0.2%): | ||||||||
144,482 | Domo, Inc., Series E*(a)(b) | 1,174,638 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Convertible Preferred Stocks (Cost $1,361,004) | 1,330,528 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Right (0.0%): | ||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels (0.0%): | ||||||||
9,579 | TOTAL SA, Expires on 1/05/17(b)^ | 6,150 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Right (Cost $6,080) | 6,150 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Private Placements (0.0%): | ||||||||
Household Durables (0.0%): | ||||||||
$ | 3,065,000 | AliphCom, Inc., 0.00%, 4/1/20(a)(b)(d) | 138,231 | |||||
|
| |||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels (0.0%): | ||||||||
268,000 | Project Samson BND Corp., 0.00%, 4/1/20(a)(b)(d) | 12,087 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Private Placements (Cost $3,333,000) | 150,318 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Convertible Bonds (0.5%): | ||||||||
Diversified Telecommunication Services (0.1%): | ||||||||
300,000 | Telefonica SA, Series TIT, 6.00%, 7/24/17+(e) | 297,752 | ||||||
500,000 | Telefonica SA, Series TEF, 4.90%, 9/25/17+ | 461,521 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
759,273 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Electrical Equipment (0.1%): | ||||||||
478,000 | Suzlon Energy, Ltd., Series SUEL, 5.75%, 7/16/19(d)(e) | 475,610 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Food Products (0.0%): | ||||||||
400,000 | REI Agro, Ltd., Registered Shares, 5.50%, 11/13/14(a)(b)(f) | 2,000 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Multi-Utilities (0.0%): | ||||||||
3,561 | Dominion Resources, Inc., 6.38%, 7/1/17 | 178,264 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels (0.1%): | ||||||||
486,000 | Cobalt International Energy, Inc., 2.63%, 12/1/19 | 190,755 | ||||||
596,000 | Cobalt International Energy, Inc., 3.13%, 5/15/24 | 166,880 | ||||||
631,620 | Dana Gas Sukuk, Ltd., 7.00%, 10/31/17(e) | 566,879 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
924,514 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Pharmaceuticals (0.1%): | ||||||||
800,000 | Bayer Capital Corp. BV, 5.63%, 11/22/19+(e) | 918,621 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Real Estate Management & Development (0.0%): | ||||||||
250,000 | CapitaLand, Ltd., 1.95%, 10/17/23+(e) | 170,776 | ||||||
|
|
Continued
9
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Contracts, Notional Amount or Principal Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
Convertible Bonds, continued | ||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment (0.0%): | ||||||||
$ | 113,000 | Intel Corp., 3.25%, 8/1/39 | $ | 199,233 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services (0.1%): | ||||||||
6,388 | Mandatory Exchange Trust, 5.75%, 6/1/19(e) | 697,888 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Convertible Bonds (Cost $5,651,750) | 4,326,179 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Bank Loans (0.6%): | ||||||||
Capital Markets (0.2%): | ||||||||
857,857 | Promontoria Blue Holding 2 BV, 7.00%, 4/15/20(b)(d)(g) | 902,894 | ||||||
102,751 | Sheridan Production Partners, 4.50%, 12/16/20(d)(g) | 82,029 | ||||||
38,331 | Sheridan Production Partners, 4.50%, 12/16/20(d)(g) | 30,601 | ||||||
738,483 | Sheridan Production Partners, 4.50%, 12/16/20(d)(g) | 589,554 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,605,078 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Energy Equipment & Services (0.1%): | ||||||||
369,419 | Drillships Financing Holdings, Inc., 6.00%, 3/31/21(d) | 237,906 | ||||||
1,273,508 | Seadrill, Ltd., 4.00%, 2/21/21(d) | 867,258 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,105,164 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure (0.1%): | ||||||||
513,713 | Hilton Worldwide Finance LLC, 3.50%, 10/26/20(d) | 529,459 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Marine (0.1%): | ||||||||
469,620 | Drillships Ocean Ventures, Inc., 5.50%, 7/25/21(d) | 369,140 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Media (0.1%): | ||||||||
430,160 | Univision Communications, Inc., 4.00%, 3/1/20(d) | 432,311 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Metals & Mining (0.0%): | ||||||||
166,625 | Novelis, Inc., 4.25%, 6/2/22(d) | 167,510 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels (0.1%): | ||||||||
405,533 | Fieldwood Energy LLC, 8.38%, 9/20/20(d) | 283,873 | ||||||
111,961 | Fieldwood Holdings LLC, 8.00%, 8/31/20(d) | 105,803 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
389,676 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Trading Companies & Distributors (0.0%): | ||||||||
279,150 | Univar USA, Inc., 4.25%, 7/1/22(d) | 281,534 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Bank Loans (Cost $5,785,124) | 4,879,872 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (0.0%): | ||||||||
459,000 | Logistics UK, Class F, Series 2015-1A, 0.66%, 8/20/25(a)(b)(d) | 543,067 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (Cost $689,595) | 543,067 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Corporate Bonds (1.5%): | ||||||||
Banks (0.4%): | ||||||||
168,000 | Bank of America Corp., 2.00%, 1/11/18, MTN | 168,387 | ||||||
163,000 | Bank of America Corp., 2.60%, 1/15/19 | 164,393 | ||||||
473,000 | Citigroup, Inc., 1.80%, 2/5/18 | 472,735 | ||||||
389,000 | Citigroup, Inc., Series O, 5.87%, 12/29/49, Callable 3/27/20 @ 100^(d) | 392,890 |
Contracts, Notional Amount or Principal Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
Corporate Bonds, continued | ||||||||
Banks, continued | ||||||||
$ | 451,000 | JPMorgan Chase & Co., 2.30%, 8/15/21, Callable 8/15/20 @ 100 | $ | 442,645 | ||||
137,000 | JPMorgan Chase & Co., 4.35%, 8/15/21 | 146,562 | ||||||
386,000 | JPMorgan Chase & Co., 1.94%, 1/15/23, Callable 1/15/22 @ 100(d) | 387,377 | ||||||
162,000 | Merrill Lynch & Co., 6.88%, 4/25/18, MTN | 172,191 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
2,347,180 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Biotechnology (0.1%): | ||||||||
353,000 | AbbVie, Inc., 2.50%, 5/14/20, Callable 4/14/20 @ 100 | 353,092 | ||||||
286,000 | AbbVie, Inc., 2.30%, 5/14/21, Callable 4/14/21 @ 100 | 280,219 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
633,311 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Capital Markets (0.1%): | ||||||||
321,000 | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The), Series L, 5.70%, 12/29/49, Callable 5/10/19 @ 100^(d) | 328,961 | ||||||
337,000 | Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (The), Series M, 5.38%, 12/31/49, Callable 5/10/20 @ 100^(d) | 340,370 | ||||||
238,000 | Morgan Stanley, Series H, 5.45%, 7/29/49, Callable 7/15/19 @ 100^(d) | 235,620 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
904,951 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Communications Equipment (0.0%): | ||||||||
229,000 | Cisco Systems, Inc., 2.20%, 2/28/21 | 228,507 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Consumer Finance (0.2%): | ||||||||
292,000 | Ally Financial, Inc., 2.75%, 1/30/17 | 292,057 | ||||||
203,000 | Ally Financial, Inc., 3.50%, 1/27/19 | 204,015 | ||||||
209,000 | American Express Co., Series C, 4.93%, 12/29/49, Callable 3/15/20 @ 100^(d) | 198,289 | ||||||
264,000 | Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, 5.00%, 5/15/18 | 274,357 | ||||||
250,000 | General Motors Financial Co., 3.50%, 7/10/19 | 254,564 | ||||||
122,000 | Hyundai Capital America, 2.00%, 3/19/18(e) | 121,978 | ||||||
87,000 | Synchrony Financial, 3.75%, 8/15/21, Callable 6/15/21 @ 100 | 89,420 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,434,680 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Diversified Financial Services (0.0%): | ||||||||
231,000 | Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., 2.75%, 3/15/23, Callable 1/15/23 @ 100 | 230,133 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Diversified Telecommunication Services (0.2%): | ||||||||
412,000 | AT&T, Inc., 2.38%, 11/27/18 | 415,600 | ||||||
660,000 | AT&T, Inc., 3.00%, 6/30/22, Callable 4/30/22 @ 100 | 647,862 | ||||||
53,000 | Hughes Satellite Systems Corp., 7.63%, 6/15/21^ | 58,168 | ||||||
71,000 | Verizon Communications, Inc., 1.75%, 8/15/21, Callable 7/15/21 @ 100^ | 68,110 | ||||||
156,000 | Verizon Communications, Inc., 2.63%, 8/15/26^ | 143,606 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,333,346 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (0.0%): | ||||||||
80,000 | American Tower Corp., 3.40%, 2/15/19 | 81,756 | ||||||
|
|
Continued
10
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Contracts, Notional Amount or Principal Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
Corporate Bonds, continued | ||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies (0.1%): | ||||||||
$ | 370,000 | Medtronic, Inc., 3.15%, 3/15/22 | $ | 378,962 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Industrial Conglomerates (0.1%): | ||||||||
38,000 | General Electric Capital Corp., Series A, 5.55%, 5/4/20, MTN^ | 41,980 | ||||||
196,000 | General Electric Capital Corp., 6.38%, 11/15/67, Callable 11/15/17 @ 100(d) | 197,225 | ||||||
332,000 | General Electric Co., Series D, 5.00%, 12/29/49, Callable 1/21/21 @ 100(d) | 344,516 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
583,721 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Internet Software & Services (0.0%): | ||||||||
163,000 | eBay, Inc., 3.80%, 3/9/22, Callable 2/9/22 @ 100^ | 168,400 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Media (0.1%): | ||||||||
114,000 | Cablevision Systems Corp., 5.88%, 9/15/22 | 111,150 | ||||||
624,776 | Delta Topco, Ltd., 10.00%, 11/24/60(a)(b) | 643,519 | ||||||
300,000 | NBCUniversal Enterprise, Inc., 5.25%, 12/31/99, Callable 3/19/21 @ 100(e) | 315,000 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,069,669 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Metals & Mining (0.0%): | ||||||||
319,000 | Freeport-McMoRan, Inc., 3.88%, 3/15/23, Callable 12/15/22 @ 100^ | 292,683 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels (0.0%): | ||||||||
136,000 | Sabine Pass Liquefaction LLC, 5.63%, 4/15/23, Callable 1/15/23 @ 100 | 144,500 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Personal Products (0.0%): | ||||||||
179,000 | Edgewell Personal Care Co., 4.70%, 5/19/21^ | 188,413 | ||||||
167,000 | Edgewell Personal Care Co., 4.70%, 5/24/22 | 172,010 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
360,423 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Pharmaceuticals (0.0%): | ||||||||
149,000 | Forest Laboratories, Inc., 5.00%, 12/15/21, Callable 9/16/21 @ 100(e) | 161,096 | ||||||
228,000 | Mylan, Inc., 2.55%, 3/28/19^ | 227,511 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
388,607 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Real Estate Management & Development (0.1%): | ||||||||
473,000 | Global Logistic Properties, Ltd., 3.88%, 6/4/25(b)(e) | 459,176 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment (0.0%): | ||||||||
388,000 | QUALCOMM, Inc., 3.00%, 5/20/22^ | 393,155 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Software (0.1%): | ||||||||
80,000 | Activision Blizzard, 2.30%, 9/15/21, Callable 8/15/21 @ 100(e) | 78,068 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
511,000 | Oracle Corp., 1.90%, 9/15/21, Callable 8/15/21 @ 100 | 499,345 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
577,413 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services (0.0%): | ||||||||
210,000 | T-Mobile USA, Inc., 6.00%, 4/15/24, Callable 4/15/19 @ 104.5 | 221,288 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Corporate Bonds (Cost $11,994,446) | 12,231,861 | |||||||
|
|
Contracts, Notional Amount or Principal Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
Foreign Bonds (7.1%): | ||||||||
Banks (0.1%): | ||||||||
$ | 330,000 | Lloyds TSB Bank plc, Series E, 13.00%, 1/29/49, Callable 1/21/29 @ 126+(d) | $ | 712,990 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Metals & Mining (0.0%): | ||||||||
139,000 | Constellium NV, 7.00%, 1/15/23+(e) | 147,029 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Sovereign Bonds (7.0%): | ||||||||
2,093,000 | Australian Government, Series 124, 5.75%, 5/15/21+ | 1,734,336 | ||||||
3,758,000 | Australian Government, Series 128, 5.75%, 7/15/22+ | 3,191,852 | ||||||
609,000 | Australian Government, Series 133, 5.50%, 4/21/23+ | 517,693 | ||||||
3,209,000 | Brazil Nota do Tesouro Nacional, Series NTNF, 0.94%, 1/1/21+(h)(i) | 949,944 | ||||||
209,000 | Brazil Nota do Tesouro Nacional, Series NTNB, 0.00%, 8/15/22+(i) | 194,487 | ||||||
582,959 | Bundesobligation, Series 173, 0.00%, 4/9/21+ | 629,786 | ||||||
1,804,831 | Bundesrepub. Deutshland, 0.20%, 8/15/26+(e) | 1,864,244 | ||||||
1,155,000 | Canada Housing Trust, 1.25%, 6/15/21+(e) | 852,850 | ||||||
1,774,000 | Canadian Government, 0.25%, 5/1/18+ | 1,313,844 | ||||||
4,518,000 | Canadian Government, 0.50%, 8/1/18+ | 3,353,584 | ||||||
1,126,000 | Canadian Government, 0.75%, 3/1/21+ | 827,755 | ||||||
128,000 | Federative Republic of Brazil, 2.88%, 4/1/21+ | 137,246 | ||||||
79,850,000 | Government of Japan, Series 350, 0.10%, 3/15/17+ | 683,822 | ||||||
1,789,000 | Government of Poland, 5.75%, 10/25/21+ | 481,855 | ||||||
470,000,000 | Japan Treasury Discount Bill, Series 638, 0.00%, 1/16/17+(h) | 4,021,987 | ||||||
240,000,000 | Japan Treasury Discount Bill, Series 641, 0.00%, 1/30/17+(h) | 2,054,140 | ||||||
490,000,000 | Japan Treasury Discount Bill, Series 643, 0.00%, 2/13/17+(h) | 4,194,079 | ||||||
510,000,000 | Japan Treasury Discount Bill, Series 647, 0.00%, 2/27/17+(h) | 4,366,034 | ||||||
230,000,000 | Japan Treasury Discount Bill, Series 631, 0.00%, 3/10/17+(h) | 1,969,072 | ||||||
520,000,000 | Japan Treasury Discount Bill, Series 651, 0.00%, 3/21/17+(h) | 4,452,559 | ||||||
520,000,000 | Japan Treasury Discount Bill, Serries 650, 0.00%, 6/12/17+(h) | 4,455,403 | ||||||
218,500,000 | Japan Treasury Discount Bill, Series 362, 0.10%, 3/15/18+ | 1,877,686 | ||||||
273,450,000 | Japan Treasury Discount Bill, Series 369, 0.10%, 10/15/18+ | 2,352,077 | ||||||
63,750,500 | Mexican Bonos Desarr, Series M, 6.50%, 6/10/21+(d)(j) | 2,999,995 | ||||||
2,503,000 | New Zealand Government, Series 0521, 6.00%, 5/15/21+ | 1,973,841 | ||||||
2,485,000 | Nota Do Tesouro Nacional, Series NTNF, 1.23%, 1/1/18+(i) | 754,504 | ||||||
2,118,000 | Poland Government Bond, Series 1020, 5.25%, 10/25/20+ | 553,149 |
Continued
11
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Contracts, Notional Amount or Principal Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
Foreign Bonds, continued | ||||||||
Sovereign Bonds, continued | ||||||||
$ | 4,046,000 | Poland Government Bond, Series 0725, 3.25%, 7/25/25+ | $ | 949,335 | ||||
4,234,000 | Poland Government Bond, Series 0726, 2.50%, 7/25/26+ | 919,709 | ||||||
100,000 | Republic of Argentina, 3.88%, 1/15/22+(e) | 100,724 | ||||||
488,000 | Republic of Indonesia, 2.63%, 6/14/23+(e) | 515,945 | ||||||
1,520,000 | Romania Government Bond, 4.75%, 2/24/25+ | 382,455 | ||||||
1,113,373 | United Kingdom Treasury, 2.00%, 9/7/25+ | 1,474,236 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
57,100,228 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Foreign Bonds (Cost $62,205,898) | 57,960,247 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Yankee Dollars (1.4%): | ||||||||
Banks (0.3%): | ||||||||
494,000 | BNP Paribas SA, 2.40%, 12/12/18 | 497,879 | ||||||
273,000 | Export-Import Bank of Korea, 2.63%, 12/30/20 | 272,490 | ||||||
614,000 | HSBC Holdings plc, 6.38%, 12/29/49, Callable 9/17/24 @ 100(d) | 604,023 | ||||||
403,000 | Intesa Sanpaolo SpA, 3.88%, 1/15/19 | 410,221 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,784,613 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Capital Markets (0.0%): | ||||||||
207,000 | UBS Group AG, 4.13%, 9/24/25(e) | 210,988 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Diversified Telecommunication Services (0.1%): | ||||||||
272,000 | Intelsat Jackson Holdings SA, 7.50%, 4/1/21, Callable 2/6/17 @ 103.75^ | 207,399 | ||||||
89,000 | Intelsat Jackson Holdings SA, 8.00%, 2/15/24, Callable 2/15/19 @ 104^(e) | 91,448 | ||||||
289,000 | Telecom Italia SpA, 5.30%, 5/30/24^(e) | 282,498 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
581,345 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Industrial Conglomerates (0.0%): | ||||||||
200,000 | Odebrecht Finance, Ltd., 4.38%, 4/25/25(e) | 115,500 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Internet Software & Services (0.1%): | ||||||||
314,000 | Alibaba Group Holding, Ltd., 3.13%, 11/28/21, Callable 9/28/21 @ 100 | 313,779 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels (0.2%): | ||||||||
355,000 | Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.61%, 3/11/22^(d)(e) | 366,094 | ||||||
368,000 | Petroleos Mexicanos, 4.63%, 9/21/23(e) | 357,990 | ||||||
753,000 | YPF SA, 8.50%, 7/28/25^(e) | 763,542 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
1,487,626 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Paper & Forest Products (0.1%): | ||||||||
1,018,000 | TFS Corp., Ltd., 8.75%, 8/1/23, Callable 8/1/19 @ 106.56(e) | 1,079,080 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Pharmaceuticals (0.0%): | ||||||||
287,000 | Actavis Funding SCS, 3.00%, 3/12/20, Callable 2/12/20 @ 100 | 290,979 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Real Estate Management & Development (0.0%): | ||||||||
167,500 | IRSA Propiedades Comerciales SA, 8.75%, 3/23/23, Callable 3/23/20 @ 104.38(e) | 177,341 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Road & Rail (0.0%): | ||||||||
527,380 | Inversiones Alsacia SA, 8.00%, 12/31/18, Callable 1/23/17 @ 100 | 27,687 | ||||||
|
|
Contracts, Notional Amount or Principal Amount | Fair Value | |||||||
Yankee Dollars, continued | ||||||||
Sovereign Bonds (0.7%): | ||||||||
$ | 234,000 | Federal Republic of Brazil, 4.88%, 1/22/21 | $ | 241,020 | ||||
257,000 | Federal Republic of Brazil, 2.63%, 1/5/23 | 228,730 | ||||||
736,000 | Republic of Argentina, 6.88%, 4/22/21^(e) | 783,840 | ||||||
630,000 | Republic of Argentina, 7.50%, 4/22/26(e) | 661,500 | ||||||
631,000 | Republic of Argentina, 7.13%, 7/6/36^(e) | 600,239 | ||||||
338,000 | Republic of Hungary, 6.25%, 1/29/20 | 369,688 | ||||||
934,000 | Republic of Hungary, 6.38%, 3/29/21 | 1,045,856 | ||||||
233,000 | Republic of Indonesia, 6.88%, 1/17/18(e) | 245,078 | ||||||
200,000 | Republic of Indonesia, 3.70%, 1/8/22(e) | 200,449 | ||||||
154,000 | Republic of Poland, 5.00%, 3/23/22 | 167,760 | ||||||
309,000 | Republic of Turkey, 6.75%, 4/3/18 | 322,457 | ||||||
461,000 | Saudi International Bond, 2.38%, 10/26/21(e) | 447,602 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
5,314,219 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Yankee Dollars (Cost $11,858,838) | 11,383,157 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
U.S. Government Agency Mortgages (0.3%): | ||||||||
Federal National Mortgage Association (0.3%) | ||||||||
2,574,283 | 3.00%, 1/25/46 | 2,557,328 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total U.S. Government Agency Mortgages (Cost $2,563,021) | 2,557,328 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Obligations (7.3%): | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury Bills (4.1%) | ||||||||
7,000,000 | 0.35%, 1/19/17(h) | 6,998,712 | ||||||
4,000,000 | 0.37%, 1/26/17(h) | 3,998,924 | ||||||
4,000,000 | 0.38%, 2/2/17(h) | 3,998,592 | ||||||
9,000,000 | 0.41%, 2/9/17(h) | 8,995,861 | ||||||
6,000,000 | 0.46%, 3/9/17(h) | 5,994,804 | ||||||
4,000,000 | 0.48%, 3/23/17(h) | 3,995,612 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
33,982,505 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Inflation Index Notes (1.4%) | ||||||||
3,623,800 | 0.13%, 4/15/21 | 3,717,138 | ||||||
3,584,200 | 0.63%, 1/15/26 | 3,678,332 | ||||||
3,622,700 | 0.13%, 7/15/26 | 3,532,791 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
10,928,261 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
U.S. Treasury Notes (2.1%) | ||||||||
1,140,500 | 0.88%, 1/31/17(k) | 1,140,954 | ||||||
946,500 | 1.13%, 7/31/21 | 914,926 | ||||||
16,379,900 | 1.25%, 10/31/21 | 15,883,393 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
17,939,273 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
Total U.S. Treasury Obligations (Cost $63,664,590) | 62,850,039 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Purchased Swaptions (0.0%): | ||||||||
Total Purchased Swaptions (Cost $165,464) | 405,711 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Purchased Options (0.6%): | ||||||||
Total Purchased Options (Cost $1,793,484) | 4,651,266 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Exchange Traded Funds (1.4%): | ||||||||
2,334 | ETFS Platinum Trust(k) | 201,681 | ||||||
2,764 | ETFS Physical Palladium Shares(k) | 180,240 | ||||||
61,700 | iShares Gold Trust(k) | 683,636 | ||||||
96,776 | SPDR Gold Trust*(c)(k) | 10,607,618 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Exchange Traded Fund (Cost $12,809,626) | 11,673,175 | |||||||
|
|
Continued
12
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Mutual Fund (0.0%): | ||||||||
$ | 4,496 | iShares Iboxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond Fund, 5.27% | $ | 389,129 | ||||
|
| |||||||
Total Mutual Fund (Cost $376,034) | 389,129 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Securities Held as Collateral for Securities on Loan (2.2%): | ||||||||
17,802,661 | AZL BlackRock Global Allocation Fund Securities Lending Collateral Account(l) | 17,802,661 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Securities Held as Collateral for Securities on Loan | 17,802,661 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Unaffiliated Investment Company (1.0%): | ||||||||
4,125,473 | Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management Fund, Institutional Shares, 0.31%(h) | 4,125,473 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Unaffiliated Investment Company (Cost $4,125,473) | 4,125,473 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Affiliated Investment Companies (44.9%): | ||||||||
15,460,079 | AZL Global Equity Index Fund | 144,706,339 | ||||||
20,681,413 | AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | 220,670,678 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Affiliated Investment Company (Cost $363,565,788) | 365,377,017 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Investment Securities | ||||||||
(Cost $775,719,468)(m) — 97.4% | 793,103,572 | |||||||
Net other assets (liabilities) — 2.6% | 21,415,781 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 814,519,353 | ||||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
ADR — American Depositary Receipt
MTN — Medium Term Note
SPDR — Standard & Poor’s Depository Receipts
TBA — To Be Announced Security
* | Non-income producing security. |
^ | This security or a partial position of this security was on loan as of December 31, 2016. The total value of securities on loan as of December 31, 2016, was $16,801,712. |
+ | The principal amount is disclosed in local currency and the fair value is disclosed in U.S. Dollars. |
(a) | Rule 144A, Section 4(2) or other security which is restricted to resale to institutional investors. The sub-adviser has deemed these securities to be illiquid based on procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. As of December 31, 2016, these securities represent 1.10% of the net assets of the fund. |
(b) | Security was valued in good faith pursuant to procedures approved by the Board of Trustees as of December 31, 2016. The total of all such securities represent 1.27% of the net assets of the fund. |
(c) | All or a portion of this security has been pledged as collateral for open derivative positions. |
(d) | Variable rate security. The rate presented represents the rate in effect at December 31, 2016. The date presented represents the final maturity date. |
(e) | Rule 144A, Section 4(2) or other security which is restricted to resale to institutional investors. The sub-adviser has deemed these securities to be liquid based on procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. |
(f) | Defaulted bond. |
(g) | The sub-adviser has deemed these securities to be illiquid based on procedures approved by the Board of Trustees. As of December 31, 2016, these securities represent 0.20% of the net assets of the Fund. |
(h) | The rate represents the effective yield at December 31, 2016. |
(i) | Principal amount is stated in 1,000 Brazilian Real Units. |
(j) | Principal amount is stated in 100 Mexican Peso Units. |
(k) | All or a portion of these securities are held by the AZL Cayman Global Allocation Fund I, Ltd. (the “Subsidiary”). |
(l) | Purchased with cash collateral held from securities lending. The value of the collateral could include collateral held for securities that were sold on or before December 31, 2016. |
(m) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
The following represents the concentrations by country of risk (based on the domicile of the security issuer) relative to the total fair value of investments as of December 31, 2016: (Unaudited)
Country | Percentage | |||
Argentina | 0.3 | % | ||
Australia | 0.8 | % | ||
Belgium | 0.2 | % | ||
Bermuda | — | %NM | ||
Brazil | 0.4 | % | ||
Canada | 1.0 | % | ||
Cayman Islands | 28.1 | % | ||
Chile | — | %NM | ||
China | 0.2 | % | ||
Czech Republic | — | %NM | ||
European Community | — | %NM | ||
Finland | 0.1 | % | ||
France | 1.5 | % | ||
Germany | 1.2 | % | ||
Guernsey | — | %NM | ||
Hong Kong | 0.4 | % | ||
Hungary | 0.2 | % | ||
India | 0.5 | % | ||
Indonesia | 0.3 | % | ||
Ireland (Republic of) | 0.3 | % | ||
Israel | 0.1 | % | ||
Italy | 0.5 | % |
Country | Percentage | |||
Japan | 8.6 | % | ||
Jersey | 0.1 | % | ||
Luxembourg | 0.1 | % | ||
Mexico | 0.5 | % | ||
Netherlands | 1.1 | % | ||
New Zealand | 0.3 | % | ||
Poland | 0.4 | % | ||
Portugal | — | %NM | ||
Republic of Korea (South) | 0.3 | % | ||
Romania | — | %NM | ||
Saudi Arabia | 0.1 | % | ||
Singapore | 0.3 | % | ||
Spain | 0.3 | % | ||
Sweden | 0.3 | % | ||
Switzerland | 0.6 | % | ||
Taiwan, Province Of China | 0.1 | % | ||
Thailand | 0.1 | % | ||
Turkey | — | %NM | ||
United Arab Emirates | 0.1 | % | ||
United Kingdom | 2.3 | % | ||
United States | 76.3 | % | ||
|
| |||
100.0 | % | |||
|
|
NM | Not meaningful, amount is less than 0.05%. |
Continued
13
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Securities Sold Short (0.4%):(a)
Security Description | Proceeds Received | Fair Value | Unrealized Appreciation/ Deprecation | ||||||||||||
Bank of Montreal | $ | (493,793 | ) | $ | (552,517 | ) | $ | (58,724 | ) | ||||||
Ecolab, Inc. | (552,580 | ) | (550,465 | ) | 2,115 | ||||||||||
LafargeHolcim, Ltd., Registered Shares | (238,257 | ) | (253,745 | ) | (15,488 | ) | |||||||||
Procter & Gamble Co. (The) | (599,100 | ) | (567,036 | ) | 32,064 | ||||||||||
ProLogis, Inc. | (787,708 | ) | (835,032 | ) | (47,324 | ) | |||||||||
Royal Bank of Canada | (621,331 | ) | (648,781 | ) | (27,450 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
$ | (3,292,769 | ) | $ | (3,407,576 | ) | $ | (114,807 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contracts
Cash of $41,425,327 has been segregated to cover margin requirements for the following open contracts as of December 31, 2016:
Description | Type | Expiration Date | Number of Contracts | Notional Value | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | ||||||||||||||||||||
DJ EURO STOXX 50 March Futures (Euro)(a) | Short | 3/17/17 | (25 | ) | $ | (862,259 | ) | $ | (24,088 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mini MSCI Emerging Markets Index Future (U.S. Dollar)(a) | Short | 3/17/17 | (14 | ) | (601,230 | ) | 1,285 | ||||||||||||||||||
NASDAQ 100 E-Mini March Futures (U.S. Dollar)(a) | Short | 3/17/17 | (35 | ) | (3,404,800 | ) | 2,288 | ||||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index E-Mini March Futures (U.S. Dollar)(a) | Short | 3/17/17 | (76 | ) | (8,497,560 | ) | 19,566 | ||||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index E-Mini March Futures (U.S. Dollar) | Long | 3/17/17 | 181 | 20,237,610 | 42,023 | ||||||||||||||||||||
ASX SPI 200 Index March Futures (Australian Dollar)(a) | Long | 3/16/17 | 1 | 101,569 | 1,570 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tokyo Price Index March Futures (Japanese Yen)(a) | Long | 3/9/17 | 8 | 1,039,192 | 23,755 | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note March Futures (U.S. Dollar) | Long | 3/22/17 | 164 | 20,382,125 | (125,832 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (59,433 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Option Contracts (a)
Over-the-counter options purchased as of December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Description | Counterparty | Put/ Call | Strike Price | Expiration Date | Contracts | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
AFLAC, Inc. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 85.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 11,464 | $ | 9,498 | ||||||||||||||||
Allstate Corp. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 80.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 7,300 | 19,638 | |||||||||||||||||
Apple, Inc. | UBS Warburg | Call | 110.00 | USD | 9/15/17 | 13,425 | 161,153 | |||||||||||||||||
BB&T Corp. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 40.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 15,939 | 135,819 | |||||||||||||||||
Capital One Financial Corp. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 80.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 16,317 | 230,521 | |||||||||||||||||
CIT Group, Inc. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 42.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 9,806 | 51,825 | |||||||||||||||||
Citigroup, Inc. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 55.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 221,517 | |||||||||||||||||
CME Group, Inc. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 115.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 7,846 | 79,329 | |||||||||||||||||
Comerica, Inc. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 55.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 13,712 | 223,693 | |||||||||||||||||
E*Trade Financial Corp. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 35.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 20,308 | 89,071 | |||||||||||||||||
Euro Stoxx 50 Index | Morgan Stanley | Call | 3025.00 | EUR | 3/17/17 | 69 | 21,159 | |||||||||||||||||
Euro Stoxx 50 Index | Morgan Stanley | Call | 3025.00 | EUR | 3/17/17 | 69 | 21,159 | |||||||||||||||||
Euro Stoxx 50 Index | Morgan Stanley | Call | 3125.00 | EUR | 3/17/17 | 150 | 33,218 | |||||||||||||||||
Euro Stoxx 50 Index | Citigroup Global Markets | Call | 3150.00 | EUR | 6/16/17 | 256 | 53,266 | |||||||||||||||||
Euro Stoxx 50 Index | Deutsche Bank | Call | 3426.55 | EUR | 9/21/18 | 106 | 20,831 | |||||||||||||||||
Fifth Third BanCorp | Goldman Sachs | Call | 25.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 91,876 | |||||||||||||||||
Franklin Resources, Inc. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 45.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 20,188 | 50,628 | |||||||||||||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 70.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 419,033 | |||||||||||||||||
KeyCorp | Goldman Sachs | Call | 15.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 92,147 | |||||||||||||||||
Lincoln Natl Corp. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 55.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 13,582 | 203,318 | |||||||||||||||||
MetLife, Inc. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 52.50 | USD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 135,857 | |||||||||||||||||
Morgan Stanley | Goldman Sachs | Call | 35.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 215,397 | |||||||||||||||||
Munulife Financial Corp. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 22.00 | CAD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 49,369 |
Continued
14
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Description | Counterparty | Put/ Call | Strike Price | Expiration Date | Contracts | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Qualcomm, Inc. | Deutsche Bank | Call | 52.50 | USD | 5/19/17 | 12,183 | $ | 163,663 | ||||||||||||||||
Regions Financial Corp. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 12.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 71,665 | |||||||||||||||||
SPDR Gold Shares(b) | Societe Generale | Call | 120.00 | USD | 2/17/17 | 8,975 | 2,330 | |||||||||||||||||
SPDR Gold Trust(b) | Societe Generale | Call | 121.00 | USD | 1/20/17 | 11,238 | 641 | |||||||||||||||||
State Street Corp. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 72.50 | USD | 1/19/18 | 15,129 | 172,310 | |||||||||||||||||
Stoxx Europe 600 Index | Credit Suisse First Boston | Call | 355.61 | EUR | 3/17/17 | 2,250 | 32,228 | |||||||||||||||||
SunTrust Banks, Inc. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 55.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 123,814 | |||||||||||||||||
Synchrony Financial | Goldman Sachs | Call | 35.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 113,976 | |||||||||||||||||
TD Ameritrade Holdg Corp. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 40.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 19,059 | 128,557 | |||||||||||||||||
The Charles Schwab Corp. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 40.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 103,029 | |||||||||||||||||
Tokyo Stock Exchange Price Index | Goldman Sachs | Call | 1550.00 | JPY | 1/13/17 | 88,794 | 4,961 | |||||||||||||||||
Tokyo Stock Exchange Price Index | Societe Generale | Call | 1500.00 | JPY | 2/10/17 | 66,195 | 26,799 | |||||||||||||||||
Tokyo Stock Exchange Price Index | Citigroup | Call | 1550.00 | JPY | 2/10/17 | 88,014 | 15,543 | |||||||||||||||||
Tokyo Stock Exchange Price Index | Bank of America | Call | 1520.00 | JPY | 3/10/17 | 72,815 | 29,337 | |||||||||||||||||
Tokyo Stock Exchange Price Index | UBS Warburg | Call | 1560.00 | JPY | 3/10/17 | 84,447 | 20,145 | |||||||||||||||||
Tokyo Stock Exchange Price Index | BNP Paribas | Call | 1438.66 | JPY | 4/14/17 | 89,082 | 111,449 | |||||||||||||||||
Travelers Companies, Inc. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 135.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 6,915 | 25,405 | |||||||||||||||||
Wells Fargo & Co. | Goldman Sachs | Call | 55.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 22,361 | 122,909 | |||||||||||||||||
Zions Bancorporation | Goldman Sachs | Call | 35.00 | USD | 1/19/18 | 18,333 | 181,193 | |||||||||||||||||
Euro Stoxx 50 Index | Barclays Bank | Put | 3000.00 | EUR | 1/20/17 | 507 | 1,544 | |||||||||||||||||
Ibovespa Brasil Sao Paulo Index | Bank of America | Put | 59177.00 | BRL | 4/12/17 | 76 | 43,256 | |||||||||||||||||
Russell 2000 Index | Goldman Sachs | Put | 1340.00 | USD | 1/20/17 | 1,140 | 17,337 | |||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | BNP Paribas | Put | 2225.00 | USD | 1/20/17 | 1,270 | 23,967 | |||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | JPMorgan Chase | Put | 2150.00 | USD | 2/17/17 | 759 | 13,577 | |||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | Citigroup | Put | 2195.00 | USD | 2/17/17 | 710 | 18,872 | |||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | Morgan Stanley | Put | 2150.00 | USD | 3/17/17 | 761 | 23,693 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total (Premiums $445,985) |
| $ | 4,221,522 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Over-the-counter options written as of December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Description | Counterparty | Put/ Call | Strike Price | Expiration Date | Contracts | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
Apple, Inc. | UBS Warburg | Call | 130.00 | USD | 9/15/17 | 13,425 | $ | (45,713 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Euro Stoxx 50 Index | Morgan Stanley | Call | 3450.00 | EUR | 3/17/17 | 150 | (5,188 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Ibovespa Brasil Sao Paulo Index | Bank of America | Call | 64946.76 | BRL | 4/12/17 | 76 | (37,467 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Johnson & Johnson | Barclays Bank | Call | 110.00 | USD | 1/20/17 | 10,152 | (57,405 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Qualcomm, Inc. | Deutsche Bank | Call | 70.00 | USD | 5/19/17 | 12,183 | (25,946 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Russell 2000 Index | Barclays Bank | Call | 1400.00 | USD | 1/20/17 | 1,140 | (6,007 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | BNP Paribas | Call | 2265.00 | USD | 1/20/17 | 1,270 | (14,988 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | JPMorgan Chase | Call | 2275.00 | USD | 2/17/17 | 759 | (15,304 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | Morgan Stanley | Call | 2290.00 | USD | 3/17/17 | 761 | (19,467 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Tokyo Stock Exchange Price Index | Citigroup | Call | 1650.00 | JPY | 2/10/17 | 88,014 | (1,618 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Apple, Inc. | UBS Warburg | Put | 100.00 | USD | 9/15/17 | 13,425 | (49,573 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Euro Stoxx 50 Index | Citigroup Global Markets | Put | 2350.00 | EUR | 6/16/17 | 256 | (4,742 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Euro Stoxx 50 Index | Deutsche Bank | Put | 2586.07 | EUR | 9/21/18 | 106 | (19,555 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Ibovespa Brasil Sao Paulo Index | Bank of America | Put | 50300.45 | BRL | 4/12/17 | 76 | (8,889 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Qualcomm, Inc. | Deutsche Bank | Put | 40.00 | USD | 5/19/17 | 12,183 | (1,573 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index | Citigroup | Put | 2195.00 | USD | 2/17/17 | 710 | (18,872 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
| $ | (332,307 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Exchange-traded options written as of December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Description | Put/ Call | Strike Price | Expiration Date | Contracts | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||
Tiffany & Co. | Call | 72.50 | USD | 2/17/17 | 26 | $ | (16,900 | ) | ||||||||||||
Tiffany & Co. | Call | 75.00 | USD | 2/17/17 | 26 | (12,285 | ) |
Continued
15
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Description | Put/ Call | Strike Price | Expiration Date | Contracts | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||
Whole Foods Market, Inc. | Call | 33.00 | USD | 2/17/17 | 91 | $ | (5,188 | ) | ||||||||||||
SPDR Gold Shares(b) | Put | 110.00 | USD | 2/17/17 | 90 | (22,590 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Premiums $48,069) | $ | (56,963 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
Over-the-counter currency options purchased as of December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Description | Counterparty | Strike Price | Expiration Date | Notional Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||
European Dollar Call Currency Option (USD/EUR) | Morgan Stanley | 1.12 | EUR | 4/06/17 | 25,604 | $ | 12,914 | |||||||||||||
European Dollar Call Currency Option (USD/EUR) | Goldman Sachs | 1.10 | EUR | 4/20/17 | 17,270 | 14,663 | ||||||||||||||
European Dollar Call Currency Option (USD/EUR) | Deutsche Bank | 1.11 | EUR | 5/04/17 | 18,194 | 16,085 | ||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen Call Currency Option (USD/JPY) | JPMorgan Chase | 111.25 | USD | 2/17/17 | 25,397 | 126,805 | ||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen Call Currency Option (USD/JPY) | Deutsche Bank | 110.25 | USD | 3/15/17 | 25,401 | 149,905 | ||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen Call Currency Option (USD/JPY) | UBS Warburg | 112.75 | USD | 3/22/17 | 25,430 | 109,372 | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 429,744 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Over-the-counter currency options written as of December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Description | Counterparty | Strike Price | Expiration Date | Notional Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen Call Currency Option (USD/JPY) | JPMorgan Chase | 116.50 | USD | 2/17/17 | (25,397 | ) | $ | (47,622 | ) | |||||||||||
Japanese Yen Call Currency Option (USD/JPY) | Deutsche Bank | 117.00 | USD | 3/15/17 | (25,401 | ) | (51,810 | ) | ||||||||||||
Japanese Yen Call Currency Option (USD/JPY) | UBS Warburg | 118.00 | USD | 3/22/17 | (25,431 | ) | (44,918 | ) | ||||||||||||
Maxican Call Currency Option (USD/MXN) | Goldman Sachs | 21.75 | USD | 4/05/17 | (12,910 | ) | (19,282 | ) | ||||||||||||
New Zealand Call Currency Option (USD/NZD) | Goldman Sachs | 0.73 | NZD | 5/04/17 | (18,074 | ) | (11,795 | ) | ||||||||||||
Norwegian Call Currency Option (USD/NOK) | UBS Warburg | 9.05 | USD | 4/05/17 | (12,896 | ) | (10,874 | ) | ||||||||||||
South African Call Currency Option (USD/ZAR) | UBS Warburg | 15.75 | USD | 2/17/17 | (12,698 | ) | (2,922 | ) | ||||||||||||
European Dollar Call Currency Option (USD/EUR) | Morgan Stanley | 1.05 | EUR | 4/06/17 | (25,604 | ) | (43,852 | ) | ||||||||||||
European Dollar Call Currency Option (USD/EUR) | Goldman Sachs | 1.03 | EUR | 4/20/17 | (17,270 | ) | (23,037 | ) | ||||||||||||
European Dollar Call Currency Option (USD/EUR) | Deutsche Bank | 1.04 | EUR | 5/04/17 | (18,194 | ) | (29,086 | ) | ||||||||||||
Japanese Yen Call Currency Option (USD/JPY) | JPMorgan Chase | 103.00 | USD | 2/17/17 | (25,397 | ) | (1,541 | ) | ||||||||||||
Japanese Yen Call Currency Option (USD/JPY) | Deutsche Bank | 103.00 | USD | 3/15/17 | (25,401 | ) | (3,406 | ) | ||||||||||||
Japanese Yen Call Currency Option (USD/JPY) | UBS Warburg | 105.00 | USD | 3/22/17 | (25,431 | ) | (6,402 | ) | ||||||||||||
New Zealand Call Currency Option (USD/NZD) | Goldman Sachs | 0.66 | NZD | 5/04/17 | (18,075 | ) | (14,742 | ) | ||||||||||||
South African Call Currency Option (USD/ZAR) | UBS Warburg | 13.60 | USD | 2/17/17 | (12,698 | ) | (22,011 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total (Premiums $281,021) | $ | (333,300 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
Over-the-counter interest rate swaptions purchased as of December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Description | Counterparty | Put/ Call | Exercise Rate | Expiration Date | Notional Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
MC RTR 2Y X 2Y C2.1 4/12/17 | Goldman Sachs | Call | 2.10 | USD | 4/12/17 | 2,069 | $ | 51,560 | ||||||||||||||||
5-Year Interest Rate, Pay 6-Month JPY LIBOR | Deutsche Bank | Put | 1.07 | JPY | 4/04/18 | 1,006,979 | 519 | |||||||||||||||||
MC 5YX5Y RTP PUT 1.956 4/11/2017 | Goldman Sachs | Put | 1.96 | USD | 4/11/17 | 471 | 165,619 | |||||||||||||||||
MC USD 5Y P1.986 4/12/2017 | Goldman Sachs | Put | 1.99 | USD | 4/12/17 | 472 | 160,484 | |||||||||||||||||
RTP EUR 30Y P1.5 06/09/17 | Goldman Sachs | Put | 1.50 | EUR | 6/09/17 | 95 | 27,529 | |||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
| $ | 405,711 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Over-the-counter interest rate swaptions written as of December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Description | Counterparty | Put/ Call | Exercise Rate | Expiration Date | Notional Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
RTR EUR 5Y C0.10 06/09/17 | Goldman Sachs | Call | 0.10 | EUR | 6/09/17 | 478 | $ | (19,669 | ) | |||||||||||||||
MC RTP 2Y X 2Y P3 4/12/17 | Goldman Sachs | Put | 3.00 | USD | 4/12/17 | 2,068 | (15,430 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
MC USD 5Y P2.1585 04/11/17 | Goldman Sachs | Put | 2.16 | USD | 4/11/17 | 471 | (128,503 | ) |
Continued
16
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Description | Counterparty | Put/ Call | Exercise Rate | Expiration Date | Notional Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||
MC USD 5Y P2.361 4/11/17 | Goldman Sachs | Put | 2.36 | USD | 4/11/17 | 471 | $ | (94,014 | ) | |||||||||||||||
MC USD 5YR P2.186 04/12/17 | Goldman Sachs | Put | 2.19 | USD | 4/12/17 | 472 | (124,067 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
MC USD 5YX5Y RTP PUT 2.386 4/12/17 | Goldman Sachs | Put | 2.39 | USD | 4/12/17 | 472 | (90,441 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
RTP EUR 5Y P0.45 06/09/17 | Goldman Sachs | Put | 0.45 | EUR | 6/09/17 | 479 | (9,256 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total (Premiums $127,229) |
| $ | (481,380 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Forward Currency Contracts
At December 31, 2016, the Fund’s open forward currency contracts were as follows:
Type of Contract | Counterparty | Delivery Date | Contract Amount (Local Currency) | Contract Value | Value | Net Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | ||||||||||||||||||
Short Contracts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Australian Dollar | Deutsche Bank | 1/5/17 | 530,000 | $ | 399,101 | $ | 382,343 | $ | 16,758 | |||||||||||||||
Australian Dollar | Citigroup Global Markets | 5/10/17 | 1,315,000 | 1,012,938 | 945,763 | 67,175 | ||||||||||||||||||
Australian Dollar | Goldman Sachs | 5/10/17 | 1,296,000 | 997,881 | 932,098 | 65,783 | ||||||||||||||||||
British Pound | UBS Warburg | 1/13/17 | 1,159,000 | 1,448,634 | 1,428,625 | 20,009 | ||||||||||||||||||
British Pound | Deutsche Bank | 2/9/17 | 185,000 | 230,974 | 228,188 | 2,786 | ||||||||||||||||||
Emirati Dirham | BNP Paribas | 1/19/17 | 2,788,058 | 753,000 | 759,166 | (6,166 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Emirati Dirham | Goldman Sachs | 1/19/17 | 2,790,242 | 753,000 | 759,761 | (6,761 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Emirati Dirham | BNP Paribas | 1/25/17 | 2,766,290 | 747,000 | 753,231 | (6,231 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
European Euro | Credit Suisse First Boston | 1/6/17 | 695,000 | 742,072 | 731,723 | 10,349 | ||||||||||||||||||
European Euro | Deutsche Bank | 1/26/17 | 561,000 | 600,663 | 591,277 | 9,386 | ||||||||||||||||||
European Euro | Morgan Stanley | 1/26/17 | 491,000 | 529,362 | 517,499 | 11,863 | ||||||||||||||||||
European Euro | Morgan Stanley | 2/2/17 | 874,000 | 942,609 | 921,486 | 21,123 | ||||||||||||||||||
European Euro | UBS Warburg | 2/24/17 | 578,000 | 605,363 | 609,979 | (4,616 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
European Euro | Deutsche Bank | 3/9/17 | 580,000 | 606,402 | 612,506 | (6,104 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | BNP Paribas | 1/12/17 | 123,847,200 | 1,200,000 | 1,060,566 | 139,434 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Deutsche Bank | 1/12/17 | 113,284,025 | 1,025,000 | 970,108 | 54,892 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Goldman Sachs | 1/17/17 | 950,000,000 | 9,176,749 | 8,137,806 | 1,038,943 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | UBS Warburg | 1/30/17 | 480,000,000 | 4,597,745 | 4,114,986 | 482,759 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | UBS Warburg | 2/2/17 | 63,539,000 | 557,883 | 544,773 | 13,110 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | BNP Paribas | 2/13/17 | 240,000,000 | 2,332,577 | 2,058,548 | 274,029 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | HSBC Bank | 2/13/17 | 3,510,006 | 32,399 | 30,106 | 2,293 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | UBS Warburg | 2/13/17 | 250,000,000 | 2,433,801 | 2,144,321 | 289,480 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Goldman Sachs | 2/16/17 | 112,054,634 | 1,027,000 | 961,230 | 65,770 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Goldman Sachs | 2/17/17 | 121,460,730 | 1,042,000 | 1,041,956 | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | UBS Warburg | 2/24/17 | 73,046,230 | 620,000 | 626,790 | (6,790 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Morgan Stanley | 2/27/17 | 510,000,000 | 4,682,508 | 4,376,656 | 305,852 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Barclays Bank | 3/2/17 | 116,243,049 | 1,027,000 | 997,691 | 29,309 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | UBS Warburg | 3/2/17 | 117,059,514 | 1,027,000 | 1,004,698 | 22,302 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Barclays Bank | 3/3/17 | 116,295,584 | 1,028,000 | 998,199 | 29,801 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | JPMorgan Chase | 3/3/17 | 116,580,812 | 1,029,000 | 1,000,647 | 28,353 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Deutsche Bank | 3/9/17 | 73,399,248 | 624,000 | 630,224 | (6,224 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | BNP Paribas | 3/10/17 | 480,000,000 | 4,753,369 | 4,121,637 | 631,732 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | JPMorgan Chase | 3/21/17 | 520,000,000 | 4,575,330 | 4,467,928 | 107,402 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Credit Suisse First Boston | 4/7/17 | 116,412,660 | 1,030,000 | 1,001,179 | 28,821 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Goldman Sachs | 4/7/17 | 117,520,597 | 1,031,000 | 1,010,708 | 20,292 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Credit Suisse First Boston | 6/12/17 | 520,000,000 | 4,609,888 | 4,487,634 | 122,254 | ||||||||||||||||||
New Zealand Dollar | UBS Warburg | 5/4/17 | 1,421,000 | 1,040,740 | 983,053 | 57,687 | ||||||||||||||||||
New Zealand Dollar | JPMorgan Chase | 5/10/17 | 1,430,000 | 1,045,674 | 989,089 | 56,585 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taiwanese Dollar | Citibank | 1/9/17 | 65,071,070 | 1,943,000 | 2,020,177 | (77,177 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Taiwanese Dollar | Goldman Sachs | 1/9/17 | 65,604,850 | 1,945,000 | 2,036,748 | (91,748 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Taiwanese Dollar | JPMorgan Chase | 1/9/17 | 64,779,873 | 1,943,000 | 2,011,136 | (68,136 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Taiwanese Dollar | Credit Suisse First Boston | 1/11/17 | 64,579,900 | 1,925,000 | 2,005,127 | (80,127 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Taiwanese Dollar | Deutsche Bank | 2/16/17 | 24,630,540 | 737,000 | 766,105 | (29,105 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 70,410,662 | $ | 66,773,471 | $ | 3,637,191 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued
17
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Type of Contract | Counterparty | Delivery Date | Contract Amount (Local Currency) | Contract Value | Value | Net Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | ||||||||||||||||||
Long Contracts: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Emirati Dirham | BNP Paribas | 1/19/17 | 1,461,000 | $ | 397,662 | $ | 397,819 | $ | 157 | |||||||||||||||
Emirati Dirham | Goldman Sachs | 1/19/17 | 1,462,000 | 397,942 | 398,091 | 149 | ||||||||||||||||||
Emirati Dirham | BNP Paribas | 1/25/17 | 1,451,000 | 394,921 | 395,092 | 171 | ||||||||||||||||||
European Euro | Credit Suisse First Boston | 1/6/17 | 695,000 | 738,560 | 731,723 | (6,837 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
European Euro | Deutsche Bank | 1/26/17 | 561,000 | 620,634 | 591,277 | (29,357 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
European Euro | Morgan Stanley | 1/26/17 | 491,000 | 543,326 | 517,499 | (25,827 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
European Euro | BNP Paribas | 2/2/17 | 874,000 | 929,232 | 921,486 | (7,746 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
European Euro | UBS Warburg | 2/24/17 | 578,000 | 606,827 | 609,979 | 3,152 | ||||||||||||||||||
European Euro | Deutsche Bank | 3/9/17 | 580,000 | 608,901 | 612,506 | 3,605 | ||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | BNP Paribas | 1/12/17 | 62,819,000 | 600,672 | 537,951 | (62,721 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Deutsche Bank | 1/12/17 | 113,284,025 | 1,021,727 | 970,108 | (51,619 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | Goldman Sachs | 1/17/17 | 480,000,000 | 4,619,635 | 4,111,733 | (507,902 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | UBS Warburg | 1/30/17 | 240,000,000 | 2,310,591 | 2,057,493 | (253,098 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen | BNP Paribas | 3/10/17 | 250,000,000 | 2,411,000 | 2,146,686 | (264,314 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Norwegian Krone | Morgan Stanley | 1/27/17 | 3,475,000 | 422,210 | 402,809 | (19,401 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Taiwanese Dollar | Citibank | 1/9/17 | 65,071,070 | 1,992,927 | 2,020,176 | 27,249 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taiwanese Dollar | Goldman Sachs | 1/9/17 | 65,585,400 | 2,012,439 | 2,036,144 | 23,705 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taiwanese Dollar | JPMorgan Chase | 1/9/17 | 64,779,873 | 1,985,258 | 2,011,136 | 25,878 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taiwanese Dollar | Credit Suisse First Boston | 1/11/17 | 64,579,900 | 1,982,316 | 2,005,127 | 22,811 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taiwanese Dollar | Deutsche Bank | 2/16/17 | 24,630,540 | 768,743 | 766,104 | (2,639 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 25,365,523 | $ | 24,240,939 | $ | (1,124,584 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2016, the Fund’s open forward cross currency contracts were as follows:
Purchase/Sale | Counterparty | Amount Purchased | Amount Sold | Contract Value | Value | Net Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
European Euro/Japanese Yen | HSBC Bank | 668,000 EUR | 83,094,190 JPY | $ | 762,378 | $ | 754,282 | $ | (8,096 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Japanese Yen/European Euro | HSBC Bank | 86,604,196 JPY | 668,000 EUR | 764,503 | 802,705 | 38,202 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,526,881 | $ | 1,556,987 | $ | 30,106 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Centrally Cleared Credit Default Swap Agreements — Sell Protection(a)(c)
At December 31, 2016, the Fund’s open centrally cleared credit default swap agreements were as follows:
Underlying Instrument | Clearing Agent | Expiration Date | Implied (%)(d) | Notional Amount ($)(e) | Fixed Rate (%) | Value ($) | Premiums Paid/ (Received) ($) | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||
CDX North America High Yield Index Swap Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Series 27 | JPMorgan Chase | 12/20/21 | 1.06 | 138,759 | 5.00 | 8,592 | 5,557 | 3,035 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CDX North America Investment Grade Index Swap Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Series 27 | JPMorgan Chase | 12/20/21 | 0.67 | 3,533,328 | 1.00 | 53,493 | 41,505 | 11,988 | ||||||||||||||||||||
iTraxx Crossover Swap Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Series 26 | JPMorgan Chase | 12/20/21 | 2.89 | 2,056,328 | 5.00 | 205,680 | 167,081 | 38,599 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
267,765 | 214,143 | 53,622 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued
18
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Over-the-Counter Currency Swap Agreements(a)
At December 31, 2016, the Fund’s open over-the-counter currency swap agreements were as follows:
Pay/Receive Fixed Rate | Fixed Rate (%) | Expiration Date | Counterparty | Notional Amount (Local) | Value ($) | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 1.230 | 3/15/17 | Bank of America | 798,500 | JPY | (22,493 | ) | (22,493 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Pay | 1.963 | 3/15/18 | Bank of America | 131,550,000 | JPY | 30,535 | 30,535 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 1.838 | 3/15/18 | Bank of America | 86,950,000 | JPY | 24,631 | 24,631 | |||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 2.012 | 10/15/18 | Bank of America | 273,450,000 | JPY | 289,478 | 289,478 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
322,151 | 322,151 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Centrally Cleared Interest Rate Swap Agreements(a)
At December 31, 2016, the Fund’s open centrally cleared interest rate swap agreements were as follows:
Pay/Receive Fixed Rate | Floating Rate Index | Fixed Rate (%) | Expiration Date | Clearing Agent | Notional Amount (Local) | Upfront Premiums Paid/ (Received) ($) | Value ($) | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) ($) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 6-Month Sterling LIBOR BBA | 0.568 | 7/2/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,189,680 | GBP | 34 | 14,833 | 14,799 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 6-Month Sterling LIBOR BBA | 0.563 | 7/2/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,188,934 | GBP | 34 | 15,096 | 15,062 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 6-Month Sterling LIBOR BBA | 0.584 | 7/2/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,189,624 | GBP | 35 | 13,976 | 13,941 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 6-Month Sterling LIBOR BBA | 0.537 | 7/2/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,189,747 | GBP | — | 16,494 | 16,494 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Receive | 3-Month U.S. Dollar LIBOR BBA | 0.989 | 7/5/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,860,162 | USD | — | (62,541 | ) | (62,541 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Receive | 3-Month U.S. Dollar LIBOR BBA | 1.015 | 7/5/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,860,266 | USD | — | (61,107 | ) | (61,107 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Receive | 3-Month U.S. Dollar LIBOR BBA | 1.058 | 7/5/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,910,347 | USD | 34 | (59,760 | ) | (59,794 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Receive | 3-Month U.S. Dollar LIBOR BBA | 1.018 | 7/5/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,860,125 | USD | 34 | (60,966 | ) | (61,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 6-Month Sterling LIBOR BBA | 0.638 | 7/16/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,221,848 | GBP | — | 11,688 | 11,688 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 6-Month Sterling LIBOR BBA | 0.608 | 7/16/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,221,876 | GBP | 35 | 13,291 | 13,256 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 6-Month Sterling LIBOR BBA | 0.604 | 7/16/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,221,731 | GBP | — | 13,508 | 13,508 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Receive | 3-Month U.S. Dollar LIBOR BBA | 1.219 | 7/19/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,933,552 | USD | — | (51,770 | ) | (51,770 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Receive | 3-Month U.S. Dollar LIBOR BBA | 1.183 | 7/19/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,933,279 | USD | — | (53,803 | ) | (53,803 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Receive | 3-Month U.S. Dollar LIBOR BBA | 1.208 | 7/19/20 | JPMorgan Chase | 2,933,432 | USD | — | (52,419 | ) | (52,419 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 3-Month U.S. Dollar LIBOR BBA | 0.016 | 4/9/21 | JPMorgan Chase | 582,500 | EUR | 8 | (756 | ) | (764 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 6-Month Euro Interbank Offer Rate (EURIBOR) | 0.373 | 8/15/26 | JPMorgan Chase | 1,804,831 | EUR | 32 | 41,821 | 41,790 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pay | 6-Month Euro Interbank Offer Rate (EURIBOR) | 3.027 | 4/19/27 | JPMorgan Chase | 7,110,414 | USD | — | (72,140 | ) | (72,140 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(334,554 | ) | (334,800 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Over-the-Counter Total Return Swaps at December 31, 2016(a)
Pay/Receive | Reference Entity | Expiration Date | Counterparty | Notional Amount (Local) | Unrealized (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/18/20 | BNP Paribas SA | 67,410 | EUR | $ | 8,252 | |||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/18/20 | BNP Paribas SA | 106,900 | EUR | 632 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/18/20 | BNP Paribas SA | 106,700 | EUR | 12,156 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/18/20 | BNP Paribas SA | 28,860 | EUR | 3,568 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/18/20 | BNP Paribas SA | 28,920 | EUR | 3,505 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/18/20 | BNP Paribas SA | 29,100 | EUR | 3,315 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/23/20 | BNP Paribas SA | 28,800 | EUR | 3,631 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/17/21 | BNP Paribas SA | 51,650 | EUR | 53 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/15/17 | BNP Paribas SA | 57,636 | EUR | 488 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/21/18 | BNP Paribas SA | 101,700 | EUR | 3,221 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/21/18 | BNP Paribas SA | 181,560 | EUR | 4,926 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/21/18 | BNP Paribas SA | 89,520 | EUR | 3,789 |
Continued
19
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Pay/Receive | Reference Entity | Expiration Date | Counterparty | Notional Amount (Local) | Unrealized (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/20/19 | BNP Paribas SA | 131,430 | EUR | $ | 15,598 | |||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/20/19 | BNP Paribas SA | 122,040 | EUR | 13,640 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/20/19 | BNP Paribas SA | 60,300 | EUR | 7,578 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/18/20 | BNP Paribas SA | 109,300 | EUR | 7,473 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | EURO Stoxx 50 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/27/19 | BNP Paribas SA | 92,430 | EUR | 9,283 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | NIKKEI 225 Dividend Index E-Mini March Futures | 3/31/17 | BNP Paribas SA | 11,340,000 | JPY | 15,266 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | NIKKEI 225 Dividend Index E-Mini March Futures | 3/31/17 | BNP Paribas SA | 13,925,000 | JPY | 21,222 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | NIKKEI 225 Dividend Index E-Mini March Futures | 3/30/18 | BNP Paribas SA | 19,830,600 | JPY | 8,723 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | NIKKEI 225 Dividend Index E-Mini March Futures | 3/30/18 | BNP Paribas SA | 20,025,000 | JPY | 7,060 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | NIKKEI 225 Dividend Index E-Mini March Futures | 3/29/19 | BNP Paribas SA | 10,312,500 | JPY | 7,894 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | NIKKEI 225 Dividend Index E-Mini March Futures | 3/29/19 | BNP Paribas SA | 20,514,000 | JPY | 16,738 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | NIKKEI 225 Dividend Index E-Mini March Futures | 3/29/19 | BNP Paribas SA | 10,560,000 | JPY | 5,776 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | NIKKEI 225 Dividend Index E-Mini March Futures | 3/31/20 | BNP Paribas SA | 13,960,000 | JPY | 11,398 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | NIKKEI 225 Dividend Index E-Mini March Futures | 3/31/20 | BNP Paribas SA | 17,000,000 | JPY | 18,099 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | NIKKEI 225 Dividend Index E-Mini March Futures | 3/31/20 | BNP Paribas SA | 10,488,000 | JPY | 8,395 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | S&P 500 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/21/18 | BNP Paribas SA | 257,125 | USD | 23,925 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | S&P 500 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/17/20 | Goldman Sachs | 107,944 | USD | 12,656 | ||||||||||||||
Pay | S&P 500 Index Dividends December Futures | 12/17/21 | BNP Paribas SA | 133,513 | USD | 17,738 | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 275,998 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
(a) | All or a portion of these securities are held by the AZL BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (the “VIP Subsidiary”). |
(b) | All or a portion of these securities are held by the AZL Cayman Global Allocation Fund I, Ltd. (the “Subsidiary”). |
(c) | When a credit event occurs as defined under the terms of the swap agreement, the Fund as a seller of credit protection will either (i) pay to the buyer of protection an amount equal to the par value of the defaulted reference entity and take delivery of the reference entity or (ii) pay a net amount equal to the par value of the defaulted reference entity less its recovery value. Alternatively, the Fund as a buyer of credit protection will either (i) receive from the seller of protection an amount equal to the par value of the defaulted reference entity and deliver the reference entity to the seller or (ii) receive a net amount of equal to the par value of the defaulted reference entity less its recovery value. |
(d) | Implied credit spread, represented in absolute terms, utilized in determining the market value of the credit default swap agreements as of period end will serve as an indicator of the current status of the payment/performance risk and represent the likelihood or risk of default for the credit derivative. The implied credit spread of a referenced entity reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may include upfront or daily payments required to be made to enter into the agreement. Generally, wider credit spreads represent a perceived deterioration of the referenced entity’s credit soundness and a greater likelihood or risk of default or other credit event occurring as defined under the terms of the swap agreement. |
(e) | The notional amount represents the maximum potential amount the Fund could be required to make as a seller of credit protection if a credit event occurs, as defined under the terms of the swap agreement. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
20
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investments in non-affiliates, at cost | $ | 412,153,680 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | 363,565,789 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at cost | $ | 775,719,469 | |||
|
| ||||
Investments in non-affiliates, at value* | $ | 427,726,555 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at value | 365,377,017 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at value | $ | 793,103,572 | |||
|
| ||||
Cash | 2,289 | ||||
Segregated cash for collateral | 41,852,212 | ||||
Deposits with brokers for securities sold short | 3,342,801 | ||||
Interest and dividends receivable | 1,225,766 | ||||
Foreign currency, at value (cost $120,678) | 121,616 | ||||
Unrealized appreciation on forward currency contracts | 4,171,455 | ||||
Unrealized appreciation on swap agreements | 620,642 | ||||
Receivable for variation margin on swap agreements | 18,435 | ||||
Receivable for investments sold | 3,820,434 | ||||
Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | 78,277 | ||||
Reclaims receivable | 158,869 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 121,751 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 848,638,119 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Cash received as collateral for derivatives | 3,991,000 | ||||
Written options (Premiums received $902,304) | 1,203,950 | ||||
Unrealized depreciation on swap agreements | 22,493 | ||||
Unrealized depreciation on forward currency contracts | 1,628,742 | ||||
Payable for investments purchased | 3,610,550 | ||||
Payable for collateral received on loaned securities | 17,802,661 | ||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 1,746,275 | ||||
Securities sold short (Proceeds received $3,292,769) | 3,407,576 | ||||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | 18,304 | ||||
Payable for variation margin on swap agreements | 28,189 | ||||
Interest payable on securities sold short | 1,866 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 327,877 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 18,319 | ||||
Distribution fees payable | 87,232 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 174,781 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 3,396 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 2,579 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 42,976 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 34,118,766 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 814,519,353 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 777,150,367 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | (7,218,620 | ) | |||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | 25,634,553 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | 18,953,053 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 814,519,353 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 71,886,101 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 11.33 | |||
|
|
* | Includes securities on loan of $16,801,712. |
Consolidated Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | ||||
Dividends | $ | 10,079,815 | ||
Interest | 6,308,491 | |||
Income from securities lending | 265,067 | |||
Foreign withholding tax | (564,841 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Total Investment Income | 16,088,532 | |||
|
| |||
Expenses: | ||||
Manager fees | 6,253,896 | |||
Administration fees | 297,739 | |||
Distribution fees — Class 2 | 1,810,477 | |||
Custodian fees | 362,776 | |||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 25,180 | |||
Trustee fees | 87,591 | |||
Professional fees | 63,014 | |||
Shareholder reports | 39,871 | |||
Dividends on securities sold short | 55,117 | |||
Other expenses | 133,666 | |||
|
| |||
Total expenses before reductions | 9,129,327 | |||
Less expense contractually waived/reimbursed by the Manager | (3,050 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net expenses | 9,126,277 | |||
|
| |||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 6,962,255 | |||
|
| |||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: | ||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions | 4,234,420 | |||
Net realized gains/(losses) from affiliated transactions | 225,264 | |||
Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts | (1,681,813 | ) | ||
Net realized gains/(losses) on options contracts | (4,218,481 | ) | ||
Net realized gains (losses) on securities transactions held short | 169,844 | |||
Net realized gains/(losses) on swap agreements | 1,419,038 | |||
Net realized gains/(losses) on forward currency contracts | (4,773,939 | ) | ||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 24,523,262 | |||
|
| |||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 19,897,595 | |||
|
| |||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 26,859,850 | ||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
21
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||
Change In Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 6,962,255 | $ | 5,591,952 | ||||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | (4,625,667 | ) | 14,176,104 | |||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 24,523,262 | (33,614,554 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 26,859,850 | (13,846,498 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||
From net investment income | (21,857,180 | ) | (9,611,041 | ) | ||||||
From net realized gains | (29,417,164 | ) | (13,360,270 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | (51,274,344 | ) | (22,971,311 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 18,938,747 | 54,905,887 | ||||||||
Proceeds from dividends reinvested | 51,274,343 | 22,971,311 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (61,642,093 | ) | (29,131,353 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | 8,570,997 | 48,745,845 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | (15,843,497 | ) | 11,928,036 | |||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 830,362,850 | 818,434,814 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 814,519,353 | $ | 830,362,850 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | (7,218,620 | ) | $ | 10,684,714 | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 1,644,044 | 4,466,783 | ||||||||
Dividends reinvested | 4,565,836 | 1,975,177 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (5,372,625 | ) | (2,376,490 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | 837,255 | 4,065,470 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
22
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Consolidated Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
Year Ended 2016 | Year Ended 2015 | Year Ended December 31, 2014 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | January 10, 2012 to December 31, 2012 (a) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 11.69 | $ | 12.22 | $ | 12.02 | $ | 10.54 | $ | 10.00 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Investment Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 0.27 | (0.26 | ) | 0.16 | 1.43 | 0.56 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 0.37 | (0.19 | ) | 0.26 | 1.48 | 0.67 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders From: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | (0.31 | ) | (0.14 | ) | — | %(b) | — | (0.12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains | (0.42 | ) | (0.20 | ) | (0.06 | ) | — | %(b) | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Dividends | (0.73 | ) | (0.34 | ) | (0.06 | ) | — | %(b) | (0.13 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 11.33 | $ | 11.69 | $ | 12.22 | $ | 12.02 | $ | 10.54 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Return(c) | 3.34 | % | (1.57 | )% | 2.18 | % | 14.08 | % | 6.71 | %(d) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 814,519 | $ | 830,363 | $ | 818,435 | $ | 681,691 | $ | 326,544 | |||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss)(e) | 0.85 | % | 0.67 | % | 0.96 | % | 0.55 | % | 2.01 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Before Reductions(e)(f) | 1.11 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.21 | % | 2.44 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions(e) | 1.11 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.21 | % | 2.37 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions, Excluding Expenses Paid Indirectly(e)(g) | 1.11 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.21 | % | 2.37 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate(h) | 91 | % | 64 | % | 61 | % | 40 | % | 119 | %(d) |
(a) | Period from commencement of operations. |
(b) | Less than $0.005. |
(c) | The return includes reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but excludes insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(d) | Not annualized. |
(e) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(f) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
(g) | Expenses net of reductions excludes expenses paid indirectly, pursuant to a “commission recapture” program, which is used to pay certain Fund Expenses. |
(h) | Portfolio turnover rate can be volatile due to the amount and timing of purchases and sales of fund shares during the period. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
23
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services — Investment Companies.” The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund (formerly, AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation Fund) (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold and on foreign currency transactions are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date except in the case of foreign securities, in which case dividends are recorded as soon as such information becomes available. Income received by the Fund from sources within foreign countries may be subject to withholding or similar taxes imposed by such countries. The Funds accrue such taxes, as applicable, based on their current interpretation of tax rules in the foreign markets in which they invest.
Consolidation of Subsidiaries
During the period ended December 31, 2016, the Fund primarily invested in shares of another mutual fund managed by the Manager, the AZL BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (the “VIP Subsidiary”), a wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary of the Fund.
As of December 31, 2016, the Fund’s aggregate investment in the VIP Subsidiary was $410,101,214, representing 50.3% of the Fund’s net assets.
The VIP Subsidiary’s primary vehicle for gaining exposure to the commodities markets is through investment in the AZL Cayman Global Allocation Fund I, Ltd. (the “Cayman Subsidiary”), a wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary of the VIP Subsidiary formed in the Cayman Islands, which invests primarily in commodity-related instruments.
The Fund’s operations have been consolidated with the operations of the VIP Subsidiary and the Cayman Subsidiary.
Real Estate Investment Trusts
The Fund may own shares of real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) which report information on the source of their distributions annually. Certain distributions received from REITs during the year, which are known to be a return of capital, are recorded as a reduction to the cost of the individual REIT.
Foreign Currency Translation
The accounting records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Foreign currency amounts are translated into U.S. dollars at the current rate of exchange to determine the fair value of investments, assets and liabilities. Purchases and sales of securities, and income and expenses are translated at the prevailing rate of exchange on the respective dates of such transactions. The Fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included in the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments and foreign currencies.
24
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Floating Rate Loans
The Fund may invest in floating rate loans, which usually take the form of loan participations and assignments. These loans are made by banks and other large financial institutions to various companies and are typically senior in the borrowing companies’ capital structure. Coupon rates are variable and are tied to a benchmark lending rate. Loans involve a risk of loss in case of default or insolvency of the financial intermediaries who are parties to the transactions. A Fund records an investment when the borrower withdraws money and records the interest as earned.
Short Sales
The Fund may engage in short sales against the box (i.e., where the Fund owns or has an unconditional right to acquire at no additional cost a security substantially similar to the security sold short) for hedging purposes to limit exposure to a possible market decline in the value of its portfolio securities. In a short sale, the Fund sells a borrowed security and has a corresponding obligation to the lender to return the identical security. The Fund may also incur an interest expense if a security that has been sold short has an interest payment. When a Fund engages in a short sale, the Fund records a liability for securities sold short and records an asset equal to the proceeds received. The amount of the liability is subsequently marked to market to reflect the market value of the securities sold short. To borrow the security, a Fund also may be required to pay a premium, which would increase the cost of the security sold.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, reclassification of certain market discounts, gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales and differing treatment on certain investments) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust.
Bank Loans
The Fund may invest in bank loans, which generally have interest rates which are reset periodically by reference to a base lending rate plus a premium. These base rates are primarily the London-Interbank Offered Rate and, secondarily, the prime rate offered by one or more major U. S. banks and the certificate of deposit rate or other base lending rates used by commercial lenders. Bank loans often require prepayments from excess cash flows or allow the borrower to repay at its election. The rate at which the borrower repays cannot be predicted with accuracy. Therefore, the anticipated or actual maturity may be considerably earlier than the stated maturity shown in the Portfolio of Investments.
All or a portion of any bank loans may be unfunded. The Portfolio is obligated to fund any commitments at the borrower’s discretion. Therefore, the Portfolio must have funds sufficient to cover its contractual obligation.
Securities Lending
To generate additional income, the Fund may lend up to 33 1/3% of its assets pursuant to agreements requiring that the loan be continuously secured by any combination of cash, U.S. government or U.S. government agency securities, equal initially to at least 102% of the fair value plus accrued interest on the securities loaned (105% for foreign securities). The borrower of securities is at all times required to post collateral to the Fund in an amount equal to 100% of the fair value of the securities loaned based on the previous day’s fair value of the securities loaned, marked-to-market daily. Any collateral shortfalls are adjusted the next business day. The Fund bears all of the gains and losses on such investments. The Fund receives payments from borrowers equivalent to the dividends and interest that would have been earned on securities lent while simultaneously seeking to earn income on the investment of cash collateral received. In extremely low interest rate environments, the broker rebate fee may exceed the interest earned or the cash collateral which would result in a loss to the Fund. The investment of cash collateral deposited by the borrower is subject to inherent market risks such as interest rate risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, and other risks that are present in the market, and as such, the value of these investments may not be sufficient, when liquidated, to repay the borrower when the loaned security is returned. There may be risks of delay in recovery of the securities or even loss of rights in the collateral should the borrower of the securities fail financially. However, loans will be made only to borrowers, such as broker-dealers, banks or institutional borrowers of securities, deemed by the Manager to be of good standing and credit worthy and when in its judgment, the consideration which can be earned currently from such securities loans justifies the attendant risks. Loans are subject to termination by the Trust or the borrower at any time, and are, therefore, not considered to be illiquid investments. Securities on loan at December 31, 2016 are presented on the Fund’s Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The average outstanding amount of securities on loan was $32.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Cash collateral received in connection with securities lending is invested in a collateral account on behalf of the Fund managed by the Dreyfus Corporation, an affiliate of the Custodian and Securities Lending Agent. The collateral account invests in short-term investments that have a remaining maturity of 397 days or less, in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act. The Fund pays the Securities Lending Agent 9% of the gross revenues received from securities lending activities and keeps 91%. The Fund paid securities lending fees of $26,557 during the year ended December 31, 2016. These fees have been netted against “Income from securities lending” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
25
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The Portfolio has adopted the disclosure provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-11 (“ASU No. 2014-11”), “Transfers & Servicing (Topic 860): Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures”. ASU No. 2014-11 is intended to provide increased transparency about the types of collateral pledged in securities lending transactions and other similar transactions that are accounted for as secured borrowing.
The following table displays a breakdown of transactions accounted for as secured borrowings, the gross obligations by class of collateral pledged, and the remaining contractual maturity of those transactions as of December 31, 2016.
Overnight and Continuous | Less than 30 Days | Between 30 & 90 Days | Greater than 90 Days | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Securities Lending Transactions | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks | $ | 12,839,117 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 12,839,117 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate Debt Securities | 4,963,544 | — | — | — | 4,963,544 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Securities Lending Transactions | 17,802,661 | — | — | — | 17,802,661 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Borrowings | $ | 17,802,661 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 17,802,661 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Gross Amount of Recognized Liabilities for Securities Lending Transactions | $ | 17,802,661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
TBA Purchase and Sale Commitments
The Fund may enter into to-be-announced (TBA) purchase or sale commitments, pursuant to which it agrees to purchase or sell, respectively, mortgage-backed securities for a fixed unit price, with payment and delivery at a scheduled future date beyond the customary settlement period for such securities. With TBA transactions, the particular securities to be delivered are not identified at the trade date; however, delivered securities must meet specified terms, including issuer, rate, and mortgage term, and be within industry-accepted “good delivery” standards. The Fund may enter into TBA purchase transactions with the intention of taking possession of the underlying securities, may elect to extend the settlement by “rolling” the transaction, and/or may use TBAs to gain interim exposure to underlying securities. Until settlement, the Fund maintains liquid assets sufficient to settle its TBA commitments.
To mitigate counterparty risk, the Fund has entered into agreements with TBA counterparties that provide for collateral and the right to offset amounts due to or from those counterparties under specified conditions. Subject to minimum transfer amounts, collateral requirements are determined and transfers made based on the net aggregate unrealized gain or loss on all TBA commitments with a particular counterparty. At any time, the Fund’s risk of loss from a particular counterparty related to its TBA commitments is the aggregate unrealized gain on appreciated TBAs in excess of unrealized loss on depreciated TBAs and collateral held, if any, by such counterparty. As of December 31, 2016, no collateral had been posted by the Fund to counterparties for TBAs.
Commission Recapture
Certain Funds of the Trust participate in a commission recapture program. The Fund will utilize the recaptured commissions to pay for, in whole or part, certain expenses of the Fund, excluding investment advisory fees. Any amounts received by the Fund, if applicable, are disclosed as “Expenses paid indirectly” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Fund ceased participation in the program in June 2014.
Affiliated Securities Transactions
Pursuant to Rule 17a-7 under the 1940 Act, the Fund may engage in securities transactions with affiliated investment companies and advisory accounts managed by the Manager and sub-adviser. Any such purchase or sale transaction must be effected without a brokerage commission or other remuneration, except for customary transfer fees. The transaction must be effected at the current market price, which is either the security’s last sale price on an exchange or, if there are no transactions in the security that day, at the average of the highest bid and lowest asked price. During the year, the Fund engaged in such affiliated transactions at the current market price.
The Fund is permitted to purchase and sell securities (“crosstrade”) from and to other Allianz Funds as well as other funds and client accounts for which the Adviser or an affiliate of the Adviser serves as investment adviser, pursuant to procedures approved by the Trustees in compliance with Rule 17a-7 under the Act (the “Rule”). Each cross-trade is executed at the current market price in compliance with provisions of the Rule. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund participated in the following cross-trade transactions:
Purchases | Sales | Realized (Gain/Loss) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | $ | (797,100 | ) | $ | 273,400 | $ | 24,029 |
Derivative Instruments
All open derivative positions at period end are reflected on the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The following is a description of the derivative instruments utilized by the Fund, including the primary underlying risk exposures related to each instrument type.
Forward Currency Contracts
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund entered into forward currency contracts as an economic hedge against either specific transactions or portfolio instruments or to obtain exposure to foreign currencies. In addition to the foreign currency risk related to the use of these contracts, the Fund could be exposed to risks if the
26
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
counterparties to the contracts are unable to meet the terms of their contracts and from unanticipated movements in the value of a foreign currency relative to the U.S. dollar. In the event of default by the counterparty to the transaction, the Fund’s maximum amount of loss, as either the buyer or the seller, is the unrealized appreciation of the contract. The forward currency contracts are adjusted by the daily exchange rate of the underlying currency and any gains or losses are recorded for financial statement purposes as unrealized gains or losses until the contract settlement date. When the contract is closed, the Fund records a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. The contract amount of forward currency contracts outstanding was $98.8 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average for these contracts was $124.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Futures Contracts
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund used futures contracts to gain exposure to, or economically hedge against changes in the value of equity securities. Futures contracts are valued based upon their quoted daily settlement prices. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to segregate liquid assets in accordance with the initial margin requirements of the broker or exchange. Futures contracts are marked to market daily and a payable or receivable for the change in value (“variation margin”) is recorded by the Fund. Gains or losses are recognized but not considered realized until the contracts expire or are closed. Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock futures, interest rate risk related to bond futures, and foreign currency risk related to currency futures) and exposure to loss in excess of the variation margin disclosed in the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between the change in fair value of the underlying securities and the prices of futures contracts, the possibility of an illiquid market, and the inability of the counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The notional amount of futures contracts outstanding was $55.1 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average notional amount for these contracts was $53.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Realized gains and losses are reported as “Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Options Contracts
The Fund may purchase or write put and call options on a security or an index of securities. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund purchased and wrote call and put options to increase or decrease its exposure to underlying instruments (including equity risk, interest rate risk and/or foreign currency exchange rate risk) and/or, in the case of options written, to generate gains from options premiums.
Purchased Options Contracts — The Fund pays a premium which is included in “Investments, at value” on the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities and marked to market to reflect the current value of the option. Premiums paid for purchasing options that expire are treated as realized losses. When an option is exercised or closed, premiums paid for purchasing options are offset against proceeds to determine the realized gain/loss on the transaction. The Fund bears the risk of loss of the premium and change in value should the counterparty not perform under the contract.
Written Options Contracts — The Fund receives a premium which is recorded as a liability and is subsequently adjusted to the current value of the options written. Premiums received from writing options that expire are treated as realized gains. Premiums received from writing options that are either exercised or closed are offset against the proceeds received or the amount paid on the transaction to determine realized gains or losses. The risk associated with writing an option is that the Fund bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of an underlying asset and is required to buy or sell an underlying asset under the contractual terms of the option at a price different from the current value.
Realized gains and losses are reported as “Net realized gains/(losses) on options contracts” on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The Fund had the following transactions in purchased call and put options during the year ended December 31, 2016:
Number of Contracts | Notional Amount(a) | Cost | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding at December 31, 2015 | 3,440,218 | $ | 2,993,098 | $ | 6,078,719 | ||||||||||
Options purchased | 3,736,809 | 609,711 | 10,829,342 | ||||||||||||
Options exercised | (110,832 | ) | — | (397,930 | ) | ||||||||||
Options expired | (855,172 | ) | (2,158,595 | ) | (4,204,115 | ) | |||||||||
Options closed | (5,203,502 | ) | (296,831 | ) | (10,347,068 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Options outstanding at December 31, 2016 | 1,007,521 | $ | 1,147,383 | $ | 1,958,948 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund had the following transactions in written call and put options during the year ended December 31, 2016:
Number of Contracts | Notional Amount(a) | Premiums Received | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding at December 31, 2015 | (3,749,332 | ) | $ | (4,536 | ) | $ | (3,251,054 | ) | |||||||
Options written | (1,795,391 | ) | (1,486,755 | ) | (5,484,108 | ) | |||||||||
Options exercised | 60,695 | — | 122,202 | ||||||||||||
Options expired | 997,734 | 624,006 | 1,625,843 | ||||||||||||
Options closed | 4,331,375 | 561,496 | 6,084,813 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Options outstanding at December 31, 2016 | (154,919 | ) | $ | (305,789 | ) | $ | (902,304 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Includes swaptions and currency options, as applicable. |
27
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Swap Agreements
The Fund may invest in swap agreements. A swap is an agreement to exchange the return generated by one instrument for the return generated by another instrument. Swap agreements are privately negotiated in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market and may be entered into as a bilateral contract (“OTC swaps”) or centrally cleared (“centrally cleared swaps”). The Fund may enter into swap agreements to manage its exposure to market, interest rate, foreign currencies and credit risk. The value of swap agreements are equal to the Fund’s obligations (or rights) under swap agreements, which will generally be equal to the net amounts to be paid or received under the agreements based upon the relative values of the positions held by each party to the agreements. In connection with these arrangements, securities may be identified as collateral in accordance with the terms of the swap agreements to provide assets of value and recourse in the event of default or bankruptcy by the counterparty.
Swaps are marked to market daily using pricing sources approved by the Trustees and the change in value, if any, is recorded as unrealized gain or loss. For OTC swaps, payments received or made at the beginning of the measurement period are recorded as realized gain or loss upon termination or maturity of the OTC swap. A liquidation payment received or made at the termination of the OTC swap is recorded as a realized gain or loss. Net periodic payments received or paid by the Fund are included as part of realized gains (losses). Upon entering a centrally cleared swap, the Fund is required to deposit initial margin with the broker in the form of cash or assets determined to be liquid (the amount is subject to the clearing organization that clears the trade). Daily changes in valuation of centrally cleared swaps, if any, are recorded as a receivable or payable, as applicable, for variation margin on centrally cleared swaps.
Swap agreements involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk and exposure to loss. The primary risks associated with the use of swap agreements are imperfect correlation between movements in the notional amount and the price of the underlying instruments and the inability of counterparties or clearing house to perform. The counterparty risk for centrally cleared swap agreements is generally lower than for OTC swap agreements because generally a clearing organization becomes substituted for each counterparty to a centrally cleared swap agreement and, in effect, guarantees the parties’ performance under the contract as each party to a trade looks only to a clearing house for performance of financial obligations. However, there can be no assurance that the clearing house, or its members will satisfy its obligations to the Fund.
The notional amounts reflect the extent of the total investment exposure the Fund has under the swap agreement. The Fund bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under a swap agreement (i.e., any unrealized appreciation) in the event of the default or bankruptcy of the swap agreement counterparty. The notional amount and related unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of each swap agreement at period end is disclosed in the swap tables in the Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The Fund is a party to International Swap Dealers Association, Inc. Master Agreements (“ISDA Master Agreements”) with select counterparties that govern transactions, such as OTC swap contracts, entered into by the Fund, through the VIP Subsidiary or Cayman Subsidiary, and those counterparties. The ISDA Master Agreements maintain provisions for general obligations, representations, agreements, collateral and events of default or termination. Events of termination include conditions that may entitle counterparties to elect to terminate early and cause settlement of all outstanding OTC swap transactions under the applicable ISDA Master Agreement.
Interest rate swaps involve the exchange of commitments to pay and receive interest based on a notional amount and are subject to interest rate risk exposure. Interest rate swaps do not involve the delivery of securities, other underlying assets or principal. Accordingly, the risk of loss with respect to interest rate swaps is limited to the net amount of interest payments that a Fund is contractually obligated to make. If the other party to an interest rate swap defaults, a Fund’s risk of loss consists of the net amount of interest payments that the Fund is contractually entitled to receive. As of December 31, 2016, the Fund entered into OTC and centrally cleared interest rate swap agreements to gain or reduce exposure to interest rates or to manage duration, the yield curve or interest rate risk by economically hedging the value of the fixed rate bonds which may decrease when interest rates rise (interest rate risk). The gross notional amount of interest rate swaps outstanding was $48.4 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average gross notional amount for interest rate swaps was $61.9 for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Currency swaps are interest rate swaps in which one party pays a stream of interest payments, either fixed or floating, in exchange for another party’s stream of interest payments, either fixed or floating, based on the notional amounts of two different currencies. The notional amounts are typically determined based on the spot exchange rates at the inception of the trade. Currency swaps may also involve an exchange of notional amounts at the start, during and/or at expiration of the contract, either at the current spot rate or another specified rate. The gross notional amount of currency swaps outstanding was $4.2 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average gross notional amount for currency swaps was $3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Total return swap agreements involve commitments to pay interest in exchange for a market-linked return, both based on notional amounts. To the extent the total return of the security or index underlying the transaction exceeds or falls short of the offsetting interest rate obligation, the Fund will receive a payment from or make a payment to the counterparty. The gross notional amount of total return swaps outstanding was $3.4 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average gross notional amount for total return swaps was $4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Credit default swap agreements may have as reference obligations one or more securities that are not currently held by the Fund. The protection “buyer” in a credit default contract is generally obligated to pay the protection “seller” an upfront, periodic, or daily stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no credit event, such as a default, on a reference obligation has occurred. If a credit event occurs, the seller generally must pay the buyer the “par value” (full notional value) of the swap in exchange for an equal face amount of deliverable obligations of the reference entity described in the swap, or the seller may be required to deliver the related net cash amount, if the swap is cash settled. A Fund may be either the buyer or seller in the transaction. If the Fund is a buyer and no credit event occurs, the Fund may recover nothing if the swap is held through its termination date. However, if a credit event occurs, the buyer generally may elect to receive the full notional value of the swap in exchange for an equal face amount of deliverable obligations of the reference entity whose value may have significantly decreased. As a seller, a Fund generally receives an upfront payment or a fixed rate of income throughout the term of the swap provided that there is no credit event. As the seller, a Fund would effectively add leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, a Fund would be subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap.
Credit default swap agreements involve greater risks than if a Fund had invested in the reference obligation directly since, in addition to general market risks, credit default swaps are subject to illiquidity risk, counterparty risk and credit risk. A Fund will enter into credit default swap agreements only with counterparties that meet certain standards of creditworthiness. A buyer generally also will lose its investment and recover nothing should no credit event occur and the swap is held to its termination date. If a credit event were to occur, the value of any deliverable obligation received by the seller, coupled with the upfront, periodic, or daily payments previously received, may be less than the full notional value it pays to the buyer, resulting in a loss of value to the seller. The Fund’s obligations under a credit default swap agreement will be accrued daily (offset against any amounts owed to the Fund). In connection with credit default swaps in which a Fund is the buyer, the Fund will segregate or “earmark” cash or assets determined to be liquid, or enter into certain offsetting positions, with a value at least equal to the Fund’s exposure (any accrued but unpaid net amounts owed by the Fund to any counterparty), on a marked-to-market basis. In connection with credit default swaps in which a Fund is the seller, the Fund will segregate or “earmark” cash or assets determined to be liquid, or enter into offsetting positions, with a value at least equal to the full notional amount of the swap (minus any amounts owed to the Fund). Such
28
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
segregation or “earmarking” will ensure that the Fund has assets available to satisfy its obligations with respect to the transaction and will limit any potential leveraging of the Fund’s portfolio. Such segregation or “earmarking” will not limit the Fund’s exposure to loss.
As of December 31, 2016, the Fund entered into OTC and centrally cleared credit default swaps to manage its exposure to the market or certain sectors of the market, to reduce its risk exposure to defaults of corporate and/or sovereign issuers or to create exposure to corporate and/or sovereign issuers to which they are not otherwise exposed (credit risk). The gross notional amount of OTC and centrally cleared credit default swaps outstanding was $5.7 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average gross notional amount for credit default swaps was $20.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Summary of Derivative Instruments
The following is a summary of the fair values of derivative instruments on the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, categorized by risk exposure, as of December 31, 2016:
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | |||||||||||
Primary Risk Exposure | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value | ||||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts* | $ | 90,487 | Payable for variation margin on futures contracts* | $ | 149,920 | ||||||
Option Contracts | Investment securities, at value (purchased options) | 4,221,522 | Written options | 389,270 | ||||||||
Total Return Swap Agreements | Unrealized appreciation on swap agreements | 275,998 | Unrealized depreciation on swap agreements | — | ||||||||
Credit Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Credit Default Swap Agreements | Unrealized appreciation on swap agreements* | 53,622 | Unrealized depreciation on swap agreements* | — | ||||||||
Interest Rate Risk | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Agreements | Unrealized appreciation on swap agreements* | 140,538 | Unrealized depreciation on swap agreements* | 475,338 | ||||||||
Swaption Contracts | Investment securities, at value (purchased options) | 405,711 | Written options | 481,380 | ||||||||
Foreign Exchange Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Currency Swap Agreements | Unrealized appreciation on swap agreements | 344,644 | Unrealized depreciation on swap agreements | 22,493 | ||||||||
Forward Currency Contracts | Unrealized appreciation on forward currency contracts | 4,171,455 | Unrealized depreciation on forward currency contracts | 1,628,742 | ||||||||
Option Contracts | Investment securities, at value (purchased options) | 429,744 | Written options | 333,300 |
* | Includes cumulative appreciation/depreciation of futures contracts and cumulative unrealized gain (loss) on these swap agreements as reported in the Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments. Only current day’s variation margin for both futures contracts and these swap agreements are reported within the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Operations, categorized by risk exposure, for the year ended December 31, 2016:
Realized Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives Recognized as a Result from Operations | Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized as a Result from Operations | |||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains\(Losses) on Futures Contracts | Net Realized Gains\(Losses) on Swap Agreements | Net Realized Gains\(Losses) on Option Contracts | Net Realized Gains\(Losses) on Forward Currency Contracts | Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | $(1,681,813) | $102,257 | $(3,918,888) | $— | $4,538,663 | |||||||||||||||
Credit Risk Exposure | — | 147,862 | — | — | 25,800 | |||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | — | 1,095,410 | (701,664) | — | (153,561) | |||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk Exposure | — | 73,509 | 402,071 | (4,773,939) | 3,238,846 |
The Fund is generally subject to master netting agreements that allow for amounts owed between the Fund and the counterparty to be netted. The party that has the larger payable pays the excess of the larger amount over the smaller amount to the other party. The master netting agreements do not apply to amounts owed to/from different counterparties. The amounts shown in the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities do not take into consideration the effects of legally enforceable master netting agreements. The table below presents the gross and net amounts of these assets and liabilities with any offsets to reflect the Fund’s ability to transact net amounts in accordance with the master netting agreements at December 31, 2016. For financial reporting purposes, the Fund does not offset derivative assets and derivative liabilities that are subject to master netting arrangements in the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities. This table also summarizes the fair values of derivative instruments on the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, categorized by risk exposure, as of December 31, 2016.
29
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
At December 31, 2016, the Fund’s derivative assets and liabilities by type were as follows:
Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||
Derivative Financial Instruments: | ||||||||||
Futures contracts | $ | 78,277 | $ | 18,304 | ||||||
Forward currency contracts | 4,171,455 | 1,628,742 | ||||||||
Option contracts* | 5,056,977 | 1,203,950 | ||||||||
Swap agreements | 639,077 | 50,682 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total derivative assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities | 9,945,786 | 2,901,678 | ||||||||
Derivatives not subject to a master netting agreement or similar agreement (“MNA”) | (96,712 | ) | (103,456 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total assets and liabilities subject to a MNA | $ | 9,849,074 | $ | 2,798,222 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Includes option contracts purchased at value as reported in the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
The following table presents the Fund’s derivative assets by counterparty net of amounts available for offset under a MNA and net of the related collateral received by the Fund as of December 31, 2016:
Counterparty | Derivative Assets Subject to a MNA by Counterparty | Derivatives Available for Offset | Non-cash Collateral Received* | Cash Collateral Received* | Net Amount of Derivative Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bank of America | $ | 417,237 | $ | (68,849 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 348,388 | ||||||||||||||
Barclays Bank | 60,654 | (60,654 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
BNP Paribas | 1,444,281 | (362,166 | ) | — | — | 1,082,115 | |||||||||||||||||||
Citibank | 182,105 | (102,409 | ) | — | — | 79,696 | |||||||||||||||||||
Credit Suisse First Boston | 216,463 | (86,964 | ) | (35,000 | ) | 94,499 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deutsche Bank | 438,430 | (256,424 | ) | — | 182,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Goldman Sachs | 5,030,889 | (1,156,647 | ) | — | (3,874,242 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||||
HSBC Bank | 40,495 | (8,096 | ) | — | — | 32,399 | |||||||||||||||||||
JPMorgan Chase | 358,600 | (132,603 | ) | — | 225,997 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Morgan Stanley | 450,981 | (113,735 | ) | — | — | 337,246 | |||||||||||||||||||
Societe Generale | 29,770 | — | — | — | 29,770 | ||||||||||||||||||||
UBS Warburg | 1,179,169 | (446,917 | ) | — | — | 732,252 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 9,849,074 | $ | (2,795,464 | ) | $ | — | $ | (3,909,342 | ) | $ | 3,144,368 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the Fund’s derivative liabilities by counterparty net of amounts available for offset under a MNA and net of the related collateral pledged by the Fund as of December 31, 2016:
Counterparty | Derivative Liabilities Subject to a MNA by Counterparty | Derivatives Available for Offset | Non-cash Collateral Pledged* | Cash Collateral Pledged* | Net Amount of Derivative Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bank of America | $ | 68,849 | $ | (68,849 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
Barclays Bank | 63,412 | (60,654 | ) | — | — | 2,758 | |||||||||||||||||||
BNP Paribas | 362,166 | (362,166 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Citibank | 102,409 | (102,409 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Credit Suisse First Boston | 86,964 | (86,964 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Deutsche Bank | 256,424 | (256,424 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Goldman Sachs | 1,156,647 | (1,156,647 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
HSBC Bank | 8,096 | (8,096 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
JPMorgan Chase | 132,603 | (132,603 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Morgan Stanley | 113,735 | (113,735 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Societe Generale | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
UBS Warburg | 446,917 | (446,917 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,798,222 | $ | (2,795,464 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2,758 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | The actual collateral received or pledged may be in excess of the amounts shown in the table. The table only reflects collateral amounts up to the amount of the financial instrument disclosed on the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities. |
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has retained an independent money management organization (the “Subadviser”), to make investment decisions on behalf of the Fund. Pursuant to a subadvisory agreement with BlackRock Investment Management, LLC (“BlackRock
30
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Investment”), BlackRock Investment provides investment advisory services as the Subadviser for the Fund subject to the general supervision of the Trustees and the Manager. The Manager is entitled to a fee, computed daily and paid monthly, based on the average daily net assets of the Fund. Expenses incurred by the Fund for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.” For its services, the Subadviser is entitled to a fee payable by the Manager. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | 0.10 | % | 0.15 | % | ||||||
AZL BlackRock Global Allocation Fund | 0.75 | % | 1.19 | % |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.”
At December 31, 2016, the reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years were as follows:
Expires 12/31/2019 | Total | |||||||||
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | $ | 3,050 | $ | 3,050 |
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the year can be found on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. During the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no voluntary waivers.
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Consolidated Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL Global Equity Index Fund | $ | — | $ | 143,183,744 | $ | (6,028,767 | ) | $ | 144,706,339 | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | — | 226,456,870 | (605,162 | ) | 220,670,678 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | — | $ | 369,640,614 | $ | (6,633,929 | ) | $ | 365,377,017 | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a Trust-wide asset-based fee, which is based on the following schedule: 0.05% of daily average net assets on the first $4 billion, 0.04% of daily average net assets on the next $2 billion, 0.02% of daily average net assets on the next $2 billion and 0.01% of daily average net assets over $8 billion. The overall Trust-wide fees are accrued daily and paid monthly and are subject to a minimum annual fee. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair value services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Consolidated Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives 12b-1 fees directly from the Fund, plus a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $8,584 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate
31
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (“Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). Equity securities are valued at the last quoted sale price or, if there is no sale, the last quoted bid price is used for long securities and the last quoted ask price is used for securities sold short. Securities listed on NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. (“NASDAQ”) are valued at the official closing price as reported by NASDAQ. In each of these situations, valuations are typically categorized as a Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Investments in open-end investment companies are valued at their respective net asset value as reported by such companies and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Debt and other fixed income securities are generally valued at an evaluated bid price provided by an independent pricing source approved by the Trustees. To value debt securities, pricing services may use various pricing techniques which take into account appropriate factors such as market activity, yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, call features, credit ratings and other data, as well as broker quotes. Short term securities of sufficient credit quality with sixty days or less remaining until maturity may be valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. In each of these situations, valuations are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Futures contracts are valued at the last sales price as of the close of the primary exchange and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Options are generally valued at the average of the closing bid and ask quotations on the principal exchange on which the option is traded, which are then typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
Forward currency contracts are generally valued at the foreign currency exchange rate as of the close of the NYSE and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Non exchange-traded derivatives, such as swaps and certain options, are generally valued by approved independent pricing services utilizing techniques which take into account factors such as yields, quality, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics, call features, credit ratings and other data, as well as broker quotes and are typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The Fund generally values index options at the average of the closing bid and ask quotations on the principal exchange on which the option is traded and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. For options where market quotations are not readily available, fair value procedures as described below may be applied.
Other assets and securities for which market quotations are not readily available, or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value as determined in good faith by the Trustees or persons acting on the behalf of the Trustees. Fair value pricing may be used for significant events such as securities whose trading has been suspended, whose price has become stale or for which there is no currently available price at the close of the NYSE. Depending on the source and relative significance of valuation inputs, these instruments may be classified as Level 2 or Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The Fund utilizes a pricing service to assist in determining the fair value of securities when certain significant events occur that may affect the value of foreign securities.
In accordance with procedures adopted by the Trustees, fair value pricing may be used if events materially affecting the value of foreign securities occur between the time when the exchange on which they are traded closes and the time when the Fund’s net asset value is calculated. Management identifies possible fluctuation in international securities by monitoring the increase or decrease in the value of a designated benchmark index. In the event of an increase or decrease greater than predetermined levels, the Fund may use a systematic valuation model provided by an independent third party to fair value its international equity securities which are then typically categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Common Stocks | ||||||||||||||||||||
Aerospace & Defense | $ | 456,248 | $ | 4,747,191 | $ | — | $ | 5,203,439 | ||||||||||||
Airlines | 3,805,352 | 1,211,172 | — | 5,016,524 | ||||||||||||||||
Auto Components | 167,202 | 4,168,507 | — | 4,335,709 | ||||||||||||||||
Automobiles | 578,844 | 4,614,901 | — | 5,193,745 | ||||||||||||||||
Banks | 9,689,343 | 7,254,642 | — | 16,943,985 | ||||||||||||||||
Beverages | 936,329 | 1,783,240 | — | 2,719,569 | ||||||||||||||||
Biotechnology | 3,308,546 | 910,077 | — | 4,218,623 | ||||||||||||||||
Building Products | 960,306 | 1,008,678 | — | 1,968,984 | ||||||||||||||||
Capital Markets | 3,338,967 | 662,265 | — | 4,001,232 |
32
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Chemicals | $ | 4,297,839 | $ | 6,305,344 | $ | — | $ | 10,603,183 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Services & Supplies | — | 124,074 | — | 124,074 | ||||||||||||||||
Communications Equipment | 1,235,374 | 1,010,887 | — | 2,246,261 | ||||||||||||||||
Construction & Engineering | — | 1,620,058 | — | 1,620,058 | ||||||||||||||||
Construction Materials | — | 168,719 | — | 168,719 | ||||||||||||||||
Distributors | — | 62,146 | — | 62,146 | ||||||||||||||||
Diversified Financial Services | 2,946,214 | 180,014 | — | 3,126,228 | ||||||||||||||||
Diversified Telecommunication Services | 206,901 | 4,114,100 | — | 4,321,001 | ||||||||||||||||
Electric Utilities | 1,737,577 | 1,200,591 | — | 2,938,168 | ||||||||||||||||
Electrical Equipment | 48,922 | 1,532,547 | — | 1,581,469 | ||||||||||||||||
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components | 792,594 | 1,661,489 | — | 2,454,083 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts | 2,331,334 | 472,579 | — | 2,803,913 | ||||||||||||||||
Food & Staples Retailing | 1,923,237 | 570,916 | — | 2,494,153 | ||||||||||||||||
Food Products | 576,240 | 4,918,437 | — | 5,494,677 | ||||||||||||||||
Gas Utilities | 10,390 | 1,049,943 | — | 1,060,333 | ||||||||||||||||
Health Care Equipment & Supplies | 2,180,845 | 1,165,297 | — | 3,346,142 | ||||||||||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services | 5,332,850 | 1,795,334 | — | 7,128,184 | ||||||||||||||||
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure | 2,019,353 | 476,011 | — | 2,495,364 | ||||||||||||||||
Household Durables | 526,956 | 753,842 | — | 1,280,798 | ||||||||||||||||
Industrial Conglomerates | 1,295,916 | 2,245,800 | — | 3,541,716 | ||||||||||||||||
Insurance | 4,723,647 | 3,334,920 | — | 8,058,567 | ||||||||||||||||
Internet Software & Services | 8,549,646 | — | 1,072,959 | 9,622,605 | ||||||||||||||||
IT Services | 3,757,598 | 559,201 | — | 4,316,799 | ||||||||||||||||
Leisure Products | — | 94,488 | — | 94,488 | ||||||||||||||||
Machinery | 741,187 | 3,520,572 | — | 4,261,759 | ||||||||||||||||
Media | 5,322,596 | 1,759,945 | 30,786 | 7,113,327 | ||||||||||||||||
Metals & Mining | 141,722 | 205,902 | — | 347,624 | ||||||||||||||||
Multi-Utilities | 773,418 | 1,289,028 | — | 2,062,446 | ||||||||||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | 13,592,424 | 4,386,439 | — | 17,978,863 | ||||||||||||||||
Personal Products | 1,422,502 | 1,732,797 | — | 3,155,299 | ||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceuticals | 6,699,907 | 3,973,677 | — | 10,673,584 | ||||||||||||||||
Professional Services | — | 500,119 | — | 500,119 | ||||||||||||||||
Real Estate Management & Development | 931,646 | 4,995,776 | — | 5,927,422 | ||||||||||||||||
Road & Rail | 1,080,819 | 2,258,501 | — | 3,339,320 | ||||||||||||||||
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 1,114,238 | 1,336,761 | — | 2,450,999 | ||||||||||||||||
Software | 2,430,860 | 1,229,177 | 3,386,166 | 7,046,203 | ||||||||||||||||
Specialty Retail | 3,913,305 | 487,981 | — | 4,401,286 | ||||||||||||||||
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals | 7,322,668 | 457,160 | — | 7,779,828 | ||||||||||||||||
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods | 1,013,133 | 1,908,037 | — | 2,921,170 | ||||||||||||||||
Tobacco | 98,117 | 188,935 | — | 287,052 | ||||||||||||||||
Transportation Infrastructure | — | 76,127 | — | 76,127 | ||||||||||||||||
Wireless Telecommunication Services | 637,396 | 2,487,847 | — | 3,125,243 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Common Stocks+ | 8,919,842 | — | — | 8,919,842 | ||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stocks | ||||||||||||||||||||
Automobiles | — | 495,891 | — | 495,891 | ||||||||||||||||
Banks | 587,404 | 68,985 | — | 656,389 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts | 378,051 | 171,685 | — | 549,736 | ||||||||||||||||
Health Care Providers & Services | — | 929,829 | 395,794 | 1,325,623 | ||||||||||||||||
Internet Software & Services | — | — | 613,680 | 613,680 | ||||||||||||||||
Software | — | — | 939,710 | 939,710 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Preferred Stocks+ | 2,876,548 | — | — | 2,876,548 | ||||||||||||||||
Warrant | — | 50,365 | — | 50,365 | ||||||||||||||||
Convertible Preferred Stocks | ||||||||||||||||||||
Banks | — | 155,890 | — | 155,890 | ||||||||||||||||
Internet Software & Services | — | — | 1,174,638 | 1,174,638 | ||||||||||||||||
Right | — | 6,150 | — | 6,150 | ||||||||||||||||
Private Placements | ||||||||||||||||||||
Household Durables | — | — | 138,231 | 138,231 | ||||||||||||||||
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | — | — | 12,087 | 12,087 |
33
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
+Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Convertible Bonds | ||||||||||||||||||||
Multi-Utilities | $ | 178,264 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 178,264 | ||||||||||||
Other Convertible Bonds+ | — | 4,147,915 | — | 4,147,915 | ||||||||||||||||
Bank Loans+ | — | 4,879,872 | — | 4,879,872 | ||||||||||||||||
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | — | 543,067 | — | 543,067 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds | ||||||||||||||||||||
Media | — | 426,150 | 643,519 | 1,069,669 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Corporate Bonds+ | — | 11,162,192 | — | 11,162,192 | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign Bonds | — | 57,960,247 | — | 57,960,247 | ||||||||||||||||
Yankee Dollars+ | — | 11,383,157 | — | 11,383,157 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government Agency Mortgages | — | 2,557,328 | — | 2,557,328 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Obligations | — | 62,850,039 | — | 62,850,039 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchased Swaptions | — | 405,711 | — | 405,711 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchased Options | — | 4,651,266 | — | 4,651,266 | ||||||||||||||||
Exchange Traded Fund | 11,673,175 | — | — | 11,673,175 | ||||||||||||||||
Mutual Fund | 389,129 | — | — | 389,129 | ||||||||||||||||
Securities Held as Collateral for Securities on Loan | — | 17,802,661 | — | 17,802,661 | ||||||||||||||||
Unaffiliated Investment Company | 4,125,473 | — | — | 4,125,473 | ||||||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Company | 365,377,017 | — | — | 365,377,017 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | 509,475,411 | 275,220,591 | 8,407,570 | 793,103,572 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Securities Sold Short | (3,153,831 | ) | (253,745 | ) | — | (3,407,576 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments:* | ||||||||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | (59,433 | ) | — | — | (59,433 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Written Options | — | (722,570 | ) | — | (722,570 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Written Swaptions | — | (481,380 | ) | — | (481,380 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Forward Currency Contracts | — | 2,542,713 | — | 2,542,713 | ||||||||||||||||
Centrally Cleared Credit Default Swaps | — | 53,622 | — | 53,622 | ||||||||||||||||
Over-the-Counter Currency Swaps | — | 322,151 | — | 322,151 | ||||||||||||||||
Centrally Cleared Interest Rate Swaps | — | (334,800 | ) | — | (334,800 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Over-the-Counter Total Return Swaps | — | 275,998 | — | 275,998 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 506,262,147 | $ | 276,622,580 | $ | 8,407,570 | $ | 791,292,297 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ | For detailed industry descriptions, see the accompanying Schedule of Portfolio Investments. |
* | Other Financial Instruments would include any derivative instruments, such as futures contracts, written options, forward currency contracts and swaps. These investments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the investment. |
A reconciliation of assets in which Level 3 inputs are used in determining fair value, along with additional quantitative disclosures, are presented when there are significant Level 3 investments at the end of the period.
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | $ | 1,307,066,485 | $ | 1,610,252,625 |
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of long-term U.S. government securities included above were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | $ | 367,792,050 | $ | 394,310,027 |
34
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
6. Restricted Securities
A restricted security is a security which has been purchased through a private offering and cannot be resold to the general public without prior registration under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”) or pursuant to the resale limitations provided by Rule 144A under the 1933 Act, or an exemption from the registration requirements of the 1933 Act. Whether a restricted security is illiquid is determined pursuant to guidelines established by the Trustees. Not all restricted securities are considered illiquid. The illiquid restricted securities held as of December 31, 2016 are identified below.
Security | Acquisition Date(a) | Acquisition Cost | Shares or Principal Amount | Fair Value | Percentage of Net Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
AliphCom, Inc., 0.00%, 4/1/20 | 4/27/15 | $ | 3,065,000 | $ | 3,065,000 | $ | 138,231 | 0.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Delta Topco, Ltd. | 5/2/12 | 379,997 | 615,711 | 30,786 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Delta Topco, Ltd., 10.00%, 11/24/60 | 5/2/12 | 758,660 | 624,776 | 643,519 | 0.16 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Domo, Inc., Series E | 4/1/15 | 1,218,214 | 144,482 | 1,174,638 | 0.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Dropbox, Inc. | 1/28/14 | 1,827,985 | 95,700 | 1,042,173 | 0.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Grand Rounds, Inc. | 3/31/15 | 399,608 | 143,925 | 395,794 | 0.10 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Logistics UK, Series 2015-1A, Class F, 0.66%, 8/20/25 | 8/3/15 | 440,732 | 459,000 | 543,067 | 0.13 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Lookout, Inc., Preferred Shares | 9/19/14 | 730,222 | 63,925 | 613,680 | 0.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Lookout, Inc. | 3/4/15 | 63,364 | 5,547 | 30,786 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Palantir Technologies, Inc., Series I | 3/27/14 | 712,042 | 116,157 | 939,710 | 0.23 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Project Samson BND Corp., 0.00%, 4/1/20 | 11/11/15 | 268,000 | 268,000 | 12,087 | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
REI Agro, Ltd., Registered Shares, 5.50%, 11/13/14 | 2/7/12 | 300,000 | 400,000 | 2,000 | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Uber Technologies, Inc. | 3/21/14 | 1,063,120 | 68,532 | 3,386,166 | 0.83 | % |
(a) | Acquisition date represents the initial purchase date of the security. |
7. Investment Risks
Bank Loan Risk: There are a number of risks associated with an investment in bank loans including credit risk, interest rate risk, liquidity risk and prepayment risk. Lack of an active trading market, restrictions on resale, irregular trading activity, wide bid/ask spreads and extended trade settlement periods may impair the Fund’s ability to sell bank loans within its desired time frame or at an acceptable price and its ability to accurately value existing and prospective investments. Extended trade settlement periods may result in cash not being immediately available to the Fund. As a result, the Fund may have to sell other investments or engage in borrowing transactions to raise cash to meet its obligations. The risk of holding bank loans is also directly tied to the risk of insolvency or bankruptcy of the issuing banks. These risks could cause the Fund to lose income or principal on a particular investment, which in turn could affect the Fund’s returns. The value of bank loans can be affected by and sensitive to changes in government regulation and to economic downturns in the United States and abroad. Bank loans generally are floating rate loans, which are subject to interest rate risk as the interest paid on the floating rate loans adjusts periodically based on changes in widely accepted reference rates.
Commodities-Related Investment Risk: Exposure to the commodities markets may subject the Fund to greater volatility than investments in traditional securities. The value of commodity-linked derivative investments may be affected by changes in overall market movements, commodity index volatility, changes in interest rates, or sectors affecting a particular industry or commodity, such as drought, floods, weather, embargoes, tariffs and international economic, political and regulatory developments. The U.S. Commodities Futures Trading Commission has proposed changes to certain of its rules governing investment in commodities by mutual funds, such as the Fund. In the event these changes are adopted, or if there are changes in the tax treatment of the Fund’s direct and indirect investments in commodities, the Fund may be unable to obtain exposure to commodity markets, or may be limited in the extent to which or manner in which it can obtain such exposure.
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest in derivatives as a principal strategy. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The counterparty to a derivatives contract could default. As required by applicable law, a Fund that invests in derivatives segregates cash or liquid securities, or both, to the extent that its obligations under the instrument are not covered through ownership of the underlying security, financial instrument, or currency.
Emerging Markets Risk: Emerging markets may have less developed trading markets and exchanges which may make it more difficult to sell securities at an acceptable price and their prices may be more volatile than securities of companies in more developed markets. Settlements of trades may be subject to greater delays so that the Fund may not receive the proceeds of a sale of a security on a timely basis. Emerging countries may also have less developed legal and accounting systems and investments may be subject to greater risks of government restrictions, nationalization, or confiscation.
Foreign Securities and Currencies Risk: Investments in securities of foreign issuers carry certain risks not ordinarily associated with investments in securities of domestic issuers. Such risks include future political and economic developments, and the possible imposition of exchange controls or other foreign governmental laws and restrictions. In addition, with respect to certain countries, there is the possibility of expropriation of assets, confiscatory taxation, political or social instability or diplomatic developments which could adversely affect investments in those securities.
Security Quality Risk (also known as “High Yield Risk”): The Fund may invest in high yield, high risk debt securities and unrated securities of similar credit quality (commonly known as “junk bonds”) and may be subject to greater levels of credit and liquidity risk than funds that do not invest in such securities. These securities are considered predominately speculative with respect to the issuer’s continuing ability to make principal and interest payments. An economic downturn or period of rising interest rates could adversely affect the market for these securities and reduce the Fund’s ability to sell these securities (liquidity risk). If the issuer of a security is in default with respect to interest or principal payments, the Fund may lose the value of its entire investment.
35
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
8. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
Cost for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $ 781,221,711. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 43,164,997 | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (31,283,136 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | 11,881,861 | ||
|
|
As of the end of its tax year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund has capital loss carry forwards (“CLCFs”) as summarized in the table below. CLCFs subject to expiration are applied as short-term capital loss regardless of whether the originating capital loss was short-term or long-term. CLCFs that are not subject to expiration must be utilized before those that are subject to expiration. The Board does not intend to authorize a distribution of any realized gain for the Fund until any applicable CLCF has been offset or expires.
CLCFs not subject to expiration:
Short Term Amount | Long Term Amount | Total Amount | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | $ | — | $ | 439,156 | $ | 439,156 |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | $ | 21,857,180 | $ | 29,417,164 | $ | 51,274,344 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from that presented in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | $ | 11,142,957 | $ | 11,828,353 | $ | 22,971,310 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from that presented in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund | $ | 10,112,824 | $ | 17,025,566 | $ | (439,156 | ) | $ | 10,671,238 | $ | 37,370,472 |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales and the realization for tax purposes of unrealized gains/losses on investments in passive foreign investment companies. |
9. Ownership and Principal Holders
The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a fund creates presumptions of control of the fund, under section 2 (a)(9) of the 1940 Act. As of December 31, 2016, the Fund had an individual shareholder account which is affiliated with the Investment Adviser representing ownership in excess of 90% of the Fund.
36
AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
10. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies – Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN – also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
11. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
37
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of assets and liabilities of AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund (formerly, AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation Fund) and Subsidiary (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the consolidated schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statement of operations for the year then ended, the consolidated statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the consolidated financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and transfer agents of the underlying funds or by other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL MVP BlackRock Global Strategy Plus Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in their net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
38
Other Federal Income Tax Information (Unaudited)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, 14.51% of the total ordinary income dividends paid by the Fund qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net long-term capital gain distributions of $29,417,134.
39
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“Commission”) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
40
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
41
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
42
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other Directorships Held Outside the | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. |
Interested Trustees(3)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other Directorships Held Outside the | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
43
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 45 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 53 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 47 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without charge, by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197.
44
The Allianz VIP Fund of Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. | ||
These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
AZL® MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 5
Statement of Operations
Page 5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 6
Financial Highlights
Page 7
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 13
Other Information
Page 14
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 15
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 17
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL® MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Allianz Investment Management LLC serves as the Manager for the AZL® MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund.
What factors affected the Fund’s performance for year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL® MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) returned 9.05%. That compared to a 11.96%, 2.65% and a 8.21% total return for its benchmarks, the S&P 500 Index1, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, and the Multi-Strategy Composite Index1, respectively.
The Fund is a fund of funds that pursues broad diversification across four equity sub-portfolios and one fixed income sub-portfolio. The five underlying portfolios are managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors. Generally, the Fund allocates 50% to 70% of its assets to the underlying equity funds and between 30% and 50% to the underlying fixed-income fund. The Fund also employs the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process, which is intended to adjust the risk of the portfolio based on quantitative indicators of market risk, such as the current level of fund and market volatility.*
U.S. stocks posted solid gains for the period under review despite a challenging start. Concerns about global economic growth in January and February drove investors away from higher risk securities, pushing down equity markets to start the year. Markets rebounded in mid-February, however, and went on to post steady gains for most of the rest of the year, with the exception of a brief spike in volatility in June following the U.K.’s vote to exit the European Union.
U.S. labor markets continued to make gains during the year, although muted inflation figures kept the Federal Reserve in a dovish stance for most of the year. U.S. equity markets experienced a boost late in the year following the U.S. presidential election, as investors anticipated a more business-friendly environment.
Value stocks significantly outperformed growth stocks during 2016 while smaller stocks outperformed larger stocks; the S&P 500 gained 11.96% during the period while the S&P 600 Index2 gained 26.56% and the S&P 400 Index3 gained 20.74%. International equity markets were unable to keep up with their U.S. counterparts and generally experienced smaller gains, despite continued quantitative easing efforts by central banks in Europe and Japan. The MSCI EAFE Index4, burdened by the impact of a strengthening dollar, rose 1.00%.
Meanwhile, the U.S. bond market faced a significant headwind from rising interest rates. Treasury yields trended downward during the first half of the year, only to rise sharply after the surprising U.S. presidential election results led investors to believe inflation was on the horizon. Spreads fell throughout the year, after briefly rising during the first two months. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index gained 2.65%.
The Fund outperformed its composite benchmark during the period under review. Its domestic equity holdings benefited from a bias toward value stocks, which outperformed growth stocks for the period. The Fund’s greater-than-benchmark exposure to small- and mid-cap stocks also added to relative results, as those assets outperformed their large-cap counterparts. However, the Fund’s exposure to developed international equities negatively affected performance.*
The MVP risk management process, which includes the use of derivatives, worked as intended during the period under review and largely maintained a neutral equity allocation for most of the year relative to its target. There were two periods of volatility in 2016 during which the MVP process reduced the Fund’s equity exposure. Global growth concerns led to increased volatility at the start of the year, and volatility returned in mid-2016 as markets grappled with the U.K.’s vote in June to exit the European Union. In both instances, markets quickly recovered, and the MVP risk management process ultimately dragged on relative performance.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. |
2 | The Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index (“S&P 600”) covers approximately 3% of the domestic equities market. Measuring the small-cap segment of the market that is typically renowned for poor trading liquidity and financial instability, the index is designed to be an efficient portfolio of companies that meet specific inclusion criteria to ensure that they are investable and financially viable. |
3 | The Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (“S&P 400”) is the most widely used index for mid-sized companies. The S&P 400 covers 7% of the U.S. equities market, and is part of a series of S&P U.S. indices that can be used as building blocks for portfolio composition. |
4 | The Morgan Stanley Capital International, Europe, Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. |
Investors cannot invest directly in an index. |
1
AZL® MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a combination of DFA Strategy Underlying Funds that represent different classes in the Fund’s asset allocation.
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in an underlying fund, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of that underlying fund. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by of the underlying fund in which the Fund invests.
Stocks are more volatile and carry more risk and return potential than other forms of investments.
Emerging market investing may be subject to additional economic, political, liquidity, and currency risks not associated with more developed countries.
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
Value-based investments are subject to the risk that the broad market may not recognize their intrinsic value.
Small- to mid-capitalization companies typically have a higher risk of failure and historically have experienced a greater degree of volatility.
Debt securities held by the Fund may decline in value due to rising interest rates. Interest rates in the U.S. are at, or near, historic lows, which may increase the Fund’s exposure to risks related to rising rates.
Investing in derivatives instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risk associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional instruments.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark as well as the two component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016
Since | ||||||||
1 | Inception | |||||||
Year | (4/27/15) | |||||||
AZL® MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | 9.05 | % | 2.12 | % | ||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 5.92 | % | ||||
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 2.65 | % | 0.80 | % | ||||
Multi-Strategy Composite Index | 8.21 | % | 3.98 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL® MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | 1.39 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.15% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the other investment companies. Accordingly, Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.52%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”), the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund and the Multi-Strategy Composite Index (“Composite”). The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value-weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year. The Composite is a blended index comprised of (60%) S&P 500 and (40%) Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,057.10 | $ | 0.62 | 0.12 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,024.53 | $ | 0.61 | 0.12 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Domestic Equities | 44.6 | % | |||
Fixed Income | 38.0 | ||||
International Equities | 12.1 | ||||
Money Market | 0.2 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 94.9 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | 5.1 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
3
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Affiliated Investment Companies (94.7%): | ||||||||
320,597 | AZL DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund | $ | 2,696,219 | |||||
2,036,286 | AZL DFA Five-Year Global Fixed Income Fund | 20,281,404 | ||||||
405,358 | AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund | 3,733,344 | ||||||
1,724,989 | AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund | 18,526,385 | ||||||
461,000 | AZL DFA U.S. Small Cap Fund | 5,264,616 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Affiliated Investment Companies (Cost $47,947,996) | 50,501,968 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Unaffiliated Investment Company (0.2%): | ||||||||
90,208 | Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management Fund, Institutional Shares , 0.31%(a) | 90,208 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Unaffiliated Investment Company (Cost $90,208) | 90,208 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Investment Securities (Cost $48,038,204)(b) — 94.9% | 50,592,176 | |||||||
Net other assets (liabilities) — 5.1% | 2,733,471 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 53,325,647 | ||||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
(a) | The rate represents the effective yield at December 31, 2016. |
(b) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
Futures Contracts
Cash of $2,660,281 has been segregated to cover margin requirements for the following open contracts as of December 31, 2016:
Description | Type | Expiration Date | Number of Contracts | Notional Value | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index E-Mini March Futures | Long | 3/17/17 | 14 | $ | 1,565,340 | $ | 2,427 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note March Futures | Long | 3/22/17 | 8 | 994,250 | (5,854 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (3,427 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investment securities in non-affiliates, at cost | $ | 90,208 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | 47,947,996 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at cost | $ | 48,038,204 | |||
|
| ||||
Investment securities in non-affiliates, at value | $ | 90,208 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at value | 50,501,968 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at value | $ | 50,592,176 | |||
Cash | 1,323 | ||||
Segregated cash for collateral | 2,660,281 | ||||
Interest and dividends receivable | 434 | ||||
Receivable for capital shares issued | 168,521 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 256 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 53,422,991 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Payable for affiliated investments purchased | 88,389 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 1,234 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 4,528 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 995 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 145 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 110 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 1,943 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 97,344 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 53,325,647 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 50,660,985 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | 277,991 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | (163,878 | ) | |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | 2,550,549 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 53,325,647 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 5,149,172 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 10.36 | |||
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | |||||
Dividends from affiliates | $ | 327,711 | |||
Dividends | 179 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Income | 327,890 | ||||
|
| ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Manager fees | 75,930 | ||||
Administration fees | 51,496 | ||||
Custodian fees | 1,967 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 621 | ||||
Trustee fees | 2,087 | ||||
Professional fees | 1,867 | ||||
Shareholder reports | 1,600 | ||||
Other expenses | 673 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total expenses before reductions | 136,241 | ||||
Less expenses voluntarily waived/reimbursed by the Manager | (47,930 | ) | |||
Less expense contractually waived/reimbursed by the Manager | (31,356 | ) | |||
|
| ||||
Net expenses | 56,955 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 270,935 | ||||
|
| ||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions from affiliates | (196,562 | ) | |||
Net realized gains distributions from affiliated underlying funds | 7,434 | ||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts | 91,821 | ||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 3,344,944 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 3,247,637 | ||||
|
| ||||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 3,518,572 | |||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | April 27, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (a) | |||||||||
Change In Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 270,935 | $ | (16,859 | ) | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | (97,307 | ) | (59,515 | ) | ||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 3,344,944 | (794,395 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 3,518,572 | (870,769 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 29,807,859 | 27,572,107 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (6,088,076 | ) | (614,046 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | 23,719,783 | 26,958,061 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | 27,238,355 | 26,087,292 | ||||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 26,087,292 | — | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 53,325,647 | $ | 26,087,292 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | 277,991 | $ | — | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 3,032,018 | 2,809,530 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (628,886 | ) | (63,490 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | 2,403,132 | 2,746,040 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | For the period April 27, 2015 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2015. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
Year Ended December 31, 2016 | April 27, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (a) | |||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 9.50 | $ | 10.00 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Investment Activities: | ||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.05 | (0.01 | ) | |||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 0.81 | (0.49 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 0.86 | (0.50 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 10.36 | $ | 9.50 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Total Return(b) | 9.05 | % | (5.00 | )%(c) | ||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | ||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 53,326 | $ | 26,087 | ||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss)(d) | 0.71 | % | (0.14 | )% | ||||||
Expenses Before Reductions*(d)(e) | 0.36 | % | 0.52 | % | ||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions*(d) | 0.15 | % | 0.14 | % | ||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 15 | % | 2 | %(c) |
* | The expense ratios exclude the impact of fees/expenses paid by each underlying fund. |
(a) | For the period April 27, 2015 (commencement of operations) to December 31, 2015. |
(b) | The returns include reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but exclude insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(c) | Not annualized. |
(d) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(e) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
7
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services - Investment Companies. The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold and on foreign currency transactions are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, reclassification of certain market discounts, gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust.
Derivative Instruments
All open derivative positions at period end are reflected on the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The following is a description of the derivative instruments utilized by the Fund, including the primary underlying risk exposures related to each instrument type. The Fund’s allocation to the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process may include (a) derivatives such as index futures, other futures contracts, options, and other similar securities and (b) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large redemptions and any margin calls. Due to the leverage provided by derivatives, the notional value of the Fund’s derivative positions could exceed 20% of the Fund’s value. The Fund may also use futures to gain equity exposure and may hold cash as a buffer in the event of market shocks.
8
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Futures Contracts
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund invested in futures contracts to reduce volatility and limit the need to decrease or increase allocations to underlying funds. Futures contracts are valued based upon their quoted daily settlement prices. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to segregate liquid assets in accordance with the initial margin requirements of the broker or exchange. Futures contracts are marked to market daily and a payable or receivable for the change in value (“variation margin”) is recorded by the Fund. Gains or losses are recognized but not considered realized until the contracts expire or are closed. Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock futures, interest rate risk related to bond futures, and foreign currency risk related to currency futures) and exposure to loss in excess of the variation margin disclosed in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between the change in fair value of the underlying securities and the prices of futures contracts, the possibility of an illiquid market, and the inability of the counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The notional amount of futures contracts outstanding was $2.6 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average notional amount for these contracts was $2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Realized gains and losses are reported as “Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts” on the Statement of Operations.
Summary of Derivative Instruments
The following is a summary of the fair values of derivative instruments on the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, categorized by risk exposure, as of December 31, 2016:
Asset Derivative | Liability Derivative | |||||||||||
Primary Risk Exposure | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | ||||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | 2,427 | Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | — | ||||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | — | 5,854 |
* | For futures contracts, the amounts represent the cumulative appreciation/depreciation of these futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Portfolio Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as variation margin on futures contracts. |
The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations, categorized by risk exposure, for the year ended December 31, 2016:
Primary Risk Exposure | Location of Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized in Income | Realized Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized | Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized | |||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Net Realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts/Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | $ | 75,795 | $ | 1,897 | |||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | 16,026 | (3,512 | ) |
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018. Expenses incurred for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.”
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | 0.20 | % | 0.15 | % |
* | The Manager voluntarily reduced the management fee to 0.10% on all assets. The manager reserves the right to increase the management fee to the amount shown in the table at any time. |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.”
At December 31, 2016, the reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years were as follows:
Expires 12/31/2018 | Expires 12/31/2019 | Total | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 32,620 | $ | 31,356 | $ | 63,976 |
9
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the period can be found on the Statement of Operations.
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA Emerging Markets Core Equity Fund | $ | 1,306,652 | $ | 1,550,454 | $ | (358,689 | ) | $ | 2,696,219 | $ | 17,250 | ||||||||||||||
AZL DFA Five-Year Global Fixed Income Fund | 9,943,121 | 12,904,645 | (2,518,454 | ) | 20,281,404 | 122,351 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund | 1,813,335 | 2,155,778 | (345,319 | ) | 3,733,344 | 33,398 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund | 9,063,066 | 9,284,727 | (1,724,847 | ) | 18,526,385 | 136,424 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA U.S. Small Cap Fund | 2,582,883 | 2,165,822 | (471,199 | ) | 5,264,616 | 18,288 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | 24,709,057 | $ | 28,061,426 | $ | (5,418,508 | ) | $ | 50,501,968 | $ | 327,711 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair values services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $360 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments in other investment companies are valued at their published net asset value (“NAV”). Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board” or “Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). The investments utilizing Level 1 valuations represent investments in open-end investment companies. Futures contracts are valued at the last sales price as of the close of the primary exchange and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
10
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Company | $ | 50,501,968 | $ | — | $ | 50,501,968 | |||||||||
Unaffiliated Investment Company | 90,208 | — | 90,208 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | 50,592,176 | — | 50,592,176 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments:* | |||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | (3,427 | ) | — | (3,427 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 50,588,749 | $ | — | $ | 50,588,749 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Other Financial Instruments would include any derivative instruments, such as futures contracts. These investments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the investment. |
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 28,061,426 | $ | 5,418,508 |
6. Investment Risks
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest directly or through affiliated or unaffiliated mutual funds or unregistered investment pools in derivative instruments such as futures, options, and options on futures. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The other party to a derivatives contract could default.
7. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
Cost of securities for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $48,274,708. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 2,670,694 | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (353,226 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | 2,317,468 | ||
|
|
Capital loss carry forwards (“CLCFs”) subject to expiration are applied as short-term capital loss regardless of whether the originating capital loss was short-term or long-term. CLCFs that are not subject to expiration must be utilized before those that are subject to expiration. The Board does not intend to authorize a distribution of any realized gain for the Fund until any applicable CLCF has been offset or expires.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund utilized $54,732 in capital loss carry forwards to offset capital gains.
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 307,430 | $ | 39,764 | $ | — | $ | 2,317,468 | $ | 2,664,662 |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
11
AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
8. Ownership and Principal Holders
The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a fund creates presumptions of control of the fund, under section 2 (a)(9) of the 1940 Act. As of December 31, 2016, the Fund had an individual shareholder account which is affiliated with the Investment Adviser representing ownership in excess of 90% of the Fund.
9. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies - Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN - also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
10. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
12
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended and the statements of changes in net assets and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the two-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and transfer agents of the underlying funds. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, and the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the two-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
13
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (‘‘Commission’’) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330
14
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
15
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
16
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. | |||||
Interested Trustees(3)
| ||||||||||
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
17
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 54 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 48 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without
charge, | by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197. |
18
The Allianz VIP Fund of Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Balanced Fund
(formerly AZL MVP FusionSM Balanced Fund)
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 5
Statement of Operations
Page 5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 6
Financial Highlights
Page 7
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 13
Other Federal Income Tax Information
Page 14
Other Information
Page 15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 16
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 18
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Balanced Fund Review (unaudited)
(formerly AZL MVP FusionSM Balanced Fund)
Allianz Investment Management LLC serves as the Manager for the AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Balanced Fund.
What factors affected the Fund’s performance for the year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Balanced Fund (the “Fund”) returned 5.40%. That compared to a 11.96%, 2.65% and 7.28% total return for its benchmarks, the S&P 500 Index1, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, and the Balanced Composite Index1, respectively.
The Fund is a fund of funds that achieves broad diversification by investing in underlying funds. The Fund typically holds between 40% and 60% of its assets in equity funds and 40% to 60% of its assets in fixed-income funds. The Fund also employs the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process, which is intended to adjust the risk of the portfolio based on quantitative indicators of market risk, such as the current level of fund and market volatility.*
Overall, 2016 brought a favorable economic backdrop for stocks. Major equity categories posted gains during the period under review, as U.S. economic growth remained steady, corporate earnings in most sectors proved robust, central banks in many major economies continued to pursue accommodative strategies, and merger activity increased. Even so, the path of equity returns was not linear. For example, global markets declined sharply following Britain’s June vote to leave the European Union, but stocks recovered quickly. Meanwhile, U.S. equities posted particularly strong gains during a year-end rally after Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election. The S&P 500 Index gained 11.96% during the period while the MSCI EAFE Index2, burdened in part by the impact of a strengthening dollar, rose 1.00%.
Fixed-income markets were generally positive during the period under review. The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate for the second time in a decade and indicated that more rate hikes are likely in 2017. Spreads between U.S. Treasuries and corporate bonds tightened during the year, as investors searched for higher yields. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1 gained 2.65% during the period under review.
The Fund underperformed its composite benchmark during the period under review. This underperformance was primarily due to the Fund’s strategic allocation to international and emerging markets, which broadly lagged domestic stocks during the period. The Fund’s underlying equity portfolios also broadly detracted from relative performance, as the actively managed domestic and international funds struggled to beat their benchmarks. However, the selection of securities within the Fund’s underlying fixed-income portfolios contributed positively to relative performance on an overall basis. An out-of-benchmark allocation to high-yield bonds and a tilt towards small- and mid-cap U.S. stocks also supported relative performance. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index3 returned 17.13% during the period while the S&P 400 Index4 gained 20.74% and the S&P 600 Index5 rose 26.56%.*
The MVP risk management process, which includes the use of derivatives, worked as intended during the period under review and largely maintained a neutral equity allocation for most of the year relative to its target. There were two periods of volatility in 2016 during which the MVP process reduced the Fund’s equity exposure. Global growth concerns led to increased volatility at the start of the year, and volatility returned in mid-2016 as markets grappled with the U.K.’s vote to exit the European Union. In both instances, markets quickly recovered, and the MVP risk management process ultimately dragged on relative performance.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. |
2 | The Morgan Stanley Capital International, Europe, Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. |
3 | Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index measures the USD-denominated, high-yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch and S&P is Ba1/ BB+/BB+ or below. |
4 | The Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (“S&P 400”) is the most widely used index for mid-sized companies. The S&P 400 covers 7% of the U.S. equities market, and is part of a series of S&P U.S. indices that can be used as building blocks for portfolio composition. |
5 | The Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index (“S&P 600”) covers approximately 3% of the domestic equities market. Measuring the small-cap segment of the market that is typically renowned for poor trading liquidity and financial instability, the index is designed to be an efficient portfolio of companies that meet specific inclusion criteria to ensure that they are investable and financially viable. |
Investors cannot invest directly in an index. |
1
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Balanced Fund Review (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation with preservation of capital as an important consideration. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a combination of Permitted Underlying Funds that represent different classes in the Fund’s asset allocation.
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in underlying funds, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of those underlying funds. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by each of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests.
Returns on growth stocks may not move in tandem with returns on other categories of stocks or the market as a whole. Growth stocks may be susceptible to rapid price savings or to adverse developments in certain sectors of the market.
Emerging market investing may be subject to additional economic, political, liquidity, and currency risks not associated with more developed countries.
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
Small- to mid-capitalization companies typically have a higher risk of failure and historically have experienced a greater degree of volatility.
The performance of the Fund is expected to be lower than that of the Indices because of Fund fees and expenses. Securities in which the Fund will invest may involve substantial risk and may be subject to sudden severe price declines.
Bonds offer a relatively stable level of income, although bond prices will fluctuate, providing the potential for principal gain or loss.
Debt securities held by the Fund may decline in value due to rising interest rates. Interest rates in the U.S. are at, or near, historic lows, which may increase the Fund’s exposure to risks related to rising rates.
Investing in derivatives instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risk associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional instruments.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark as well as the two component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016
1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | |||||||||||||
Year | Year | Year | Year | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Balanced Fund | 5.40 | % | 2.86 | % | 6.21 | % | 3.89 | % | ||||||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 8.87 | % | 14.66 | % | 6.95 | % | ||||||||
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 2.65 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.23 | % | 4.34 | % | ||||||||
Balanced Composite Index | 7.28 | % | 6.00 | % | 8.44 | % | 6.06 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Balanced Fund | 0.95 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.30% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the Permitted Underlying Funds. Accordingly, Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.22%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”), the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the Balanced Composite Index (“Composite”). The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value-weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year. The Composite is a blended index comprised of (50%) S&P 500 and (50%) Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,027.80 | $ | 1.12 | 0.22 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,024.03 | $ | 1.12 | 0.22 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Fixed Income | 47.1 | % | |||
Domestic Equities | 32.9 | ||||
International Equities | 15.1 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 95.1 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | 4.9 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
3
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Affiliated Investment Companies (95.1%): |
| ||||||
4,293,575 | AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund | $ | 39,543,825 | |||||
3,149,936 | AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund | 33,830,315 | ||||||
1,523,381 | AZL DFA U.S. Small Cap Fund | 17,397,011 | ||||||
4,873,238 | AZL Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund, Class 2 | 32,163,373 | ||||||
7,578,681 | AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | 80,864,521 | ||||||
1,852,853 | AZL Gateway Fund | 22,771,561 | ||||||
6,732,541 | AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 94,928,827 | ||||||
10,793,391 | AZL MetWest Total Return Bond Fund | 108,689,445 | ||||||
2,090,238 | AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 44,835,598 | ||||||
10,815,094 | AZL Pyramis Total Bond Fund, Class 2 | 108,691,698 | ||||||
8,681,030 | AZL Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund, Class 2 | 112,766,586 | ||||||
8,437,665 | AZL Russell 1000 Value Index Fund, Class 2 | 112,980,337 | ||||||
1,225,329 | AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund, Class 2 | 17,436,434 | ||||||
5,505,122 | PIMCO PVIT Income Portfolio | 56,097,198 | ||||||
5,432,807 | PIMCO PVIT Low Duration Portfolio | 55,631,939 | ||||||
10,256,095 | PIMCO PVIT Total Return Portfolio | 109,124,850 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Affiliated Investment Companies (Cost $1,007,805,451) | 1,047,753,518 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Investment Securities | 1,047,753,518 | ||||||
| Net other assets (liabilities) — 4.9% | 54,370,053 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 1,102,123,571 | |||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
(a) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
Futures Contracts
Cash of $55,080,010 has been segregated to cover margin requirements for the following open contracts as of December 31, 2016:
Description | Type | Expiration Date | Number of Contracts | Notional Value | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index E-Mini March Futures | Long | 3/17/17 | 245 | $ | 27,393,450 | $ | 56,403 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note March Futures | Long | 3/22/17 | 222 | 27,590,438 | (173,499 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (117,096 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | $ | 1,007,805,451 | |||
|
| ||||
Investments in affiliates, at value | $ | 1,047,753,518 | |||
Segregated cash for collateral | 55,080,010 | ||||
Interest and dividends receivable | 379,102 | ||||
Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | 76,313 | ||||
Receivable for affiliated investments sold | 204,690 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 6,026 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 1,103,499,659 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Cash overdraft | 198,823 | ||||
Payable for affiliated investments purchased | 372,555 | ||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 460,147 | ||||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | 109,143 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 187,105 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 5,198 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 1,786 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 3,140 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 2,385 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 35,806 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 1,376,088 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 1,102,123,571 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 947,763,456 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | 18,502,976 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | 96,026,168 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | 39,830,971 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 1,102,123,571 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 92,739,379 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 11.88 | |||
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | |||||
Dividends from affiliates | $ | 19,262,006 | |||
Dividends | 18,735 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Income | 19,280,741 | ||||
|
| ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Manager fees | 2,261,579 | ||||
Administration fees | 59,685 | ||||
Custodian fees | 3,239 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 19,224 | ||||
Trustee fees | 65,074 | ||||
Professional fees | 47,960 | ||||
Shareholder reports | 29,639 | ||||
Other expenses | 25,478 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total expenses | 2,511,878 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 16,768,863 | ||||
|
| ||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions from affiliates | 82,291,439 | ||||
Net realized gains distributions from affiliated underlying funds | 31,192,474 | ||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts | (1,622,331 | ) | |||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | (69,648,231 | ) | |||
|
| ||||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 42,213,351 | ||||
|
| ||||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 58,982,214 | |||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||
Change In Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 16,768,863 | $ | 22,427,260 | ||||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | 111,861,582 | 60,193,767 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | (69,648,231 | ) | (97,957,526 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 58,982,214 | (15,336,499 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||
From net investment income | (25,843,598 | ) | (16,427,356 | ) | ||||||
From net realized gains | (55,908,893 | ) | (49,423,384 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | (81,752,491 | ) | (65,850,740 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 17,580,463 | 32,451,523 | ||||||||
Proceeds from dividends reinvested | 81,752,491 | 65,850,740 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (145,808,871 | ) | (126,317,790 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | (46,475,917 | ) | (28,015,527 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | (69,246,194 | ) | (109,202,766 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 1,171,369,765 | 1,280,572,531 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 1,102,123,571 | $ | 1,171,369,765 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | 18,502,976 | $ | 25,843,573 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 1,451,088 | 2,500,941 | ||||||||
Dividends reinvested | 6,975,468 | 5,424,279 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (12,086,797 | ) | (9,790,478 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | (3,660,241 | ) | (1,865,258 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund
Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 12.15 | $ | 13.03 | $ | 12.62 | $ | 11.52 | $ | 10.55 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Investment Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 0.44 | (0.42 | ) | 0.44 | 1.19 | 1.03 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 0.64 | (0.18 | ) | 0.59 | 1.31 | 1.20 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders From: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | (0.29 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.18 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.23 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains | (0.62 | ) | (0.53 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Dividends | (0.91 | ) | (0.70 | ) | (0.18 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.23 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 11.88 | $ | 12.15 | $ | 13.03 | $ | 12.62 | $ | 11.52 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Return(a) | 5.40 | % | (1.27 | )% | 4.59 | % | 11.46 | % | 11.39 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 1,102,124 | $ | 1,171,370 | $ | 1,280,573 | $ | 1,282,663 | $ | 1,017,893 | |||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 1.48 | % | 1.80 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.27 | % | 1.48 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Before Reductions*(b) | 0.22 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.23 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions* | 0.22 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.18 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate(c) | 52 | % | 11 | % | 23 | % | 6 | % | 32 | % |
* | The expense ratios exclude the impact of fees/expenses paid by each underlying fund. |
(a) | The returns include reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but exclude insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(b) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
(c) | The portfolio turnover rate can be volatile due to the amount and timing of purchases and sales of fund shares during the period. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
7
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services - Investment Companies. The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund (formerly, AZL MVP Fusion Balanced Fund) (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold and on foreign currency transactions are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, reclassification of certain market discounts, gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust.
Derivative Instruments
All open derivative positions at period end are reflected on the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The following is a description of the derivative instruments utilized by the Fund, including the primary underlying risk exposures related to each instrument type. The Fund’s allocation to the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process may include (a) derivatives such as index futures, other futures contracts, options, and other similar securities and (b) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large redemptions and any margin calls. Due to the leverage provided by derivatives, the notional value of the Fund’s derivative positions could exceed 20% of the Fund’s value. The Fund may also use futures to gain equity exposure and may hold cash as a buffer in the event of market shocks.
8
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Futures Contracts
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund invested in futures contracts to reduce volatility and limit the need to decrease or increase allocations to underlying funds. Futures contracts are valued based upon their quoted daily settlement prices. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to segregate liquid assets in accordance with the initial margin requirements of the broker or exchange. Futures contracts are marked to market daily and a payable or receivable for the change in value (“variation margin”) is recorded by the Fund. Gains or losses are recognized but not considered realized until the contracts expire or are closed. Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock futures, interest rate risk related to bond futures, and foreign currency risk related to currency futures) and exposure to loss in excess of the variation margin disclosed in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between the change in fair value of the underlying securities and the prices of futures contracts, the possibility of an illiquid market, and the inability of the counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The notional amount of futures contracts outstanding was $55 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average notional amount for these contracts was $52.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Realized gains and losses are reported as “Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts” on the Statement of Operations.
Summary of Derivative Instruments
The following is a summary of the fair values of derivative instruments on the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, categorized by risk exposure, as of December 31, 2016:
Asset Derivative | Liability Derivative | |||||||||||
Primary Risk Exposure | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | ||||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | 56,403 | Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | — | ||||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | — | 173,499 |
* | For futures contracts, the amounts represent the cumulative appreciation/depreciation of these futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Portfolio Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as variation margin on futures contracts. |
The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations, categorized by risk exposure, for the year ended December 31, 2016:
Primary Risk Exposure | Location of Gains/(Losses) Recognized in Income | Realized Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized | Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized | |||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Net Realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts/Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | $ | (1,812,006 | ) | $26,818 | |||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | 189,675 | (38,837) |
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018. Expenses incurred for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.”
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund | 0.20 | % | 0.30 | % |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.” At December 31, 2016, there were no remaining contractual reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years.
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the period can be found on the Statement of Operations. During year ended December 31, 2016, there were no voluntary waivers.
9
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund | $ | 17,804,205 | $ | 1,768,774 | $ | (17,869,520 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
AZL Boston Company Research Growth Fund | 17,832,600 | 2,758,608 | (17,961,321 | ) | — | 47,562 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund | 11,695,614 | 28,238,181 | (1,060,739 | ) | 39,543,825 | 128,516 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund | 11,839,464 | 22,502,590 | (3,636,026 | ) | 33,830,315 | 106,578 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA U.S. Small Cap Fund | 17,193,496 | 151,160 | (3,771,708 | ) | 17,397,011 | 74,745 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund, Class 2 | 10,609,329 | 22,583,241 | (1,070,695 | ) | 32,163,373 | 62,567 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | — | 84,394,772 | (1,170,951 | ) | 80,864,521 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Federated Clover Small Cap Value Fund | 17,276,335 | 758,628 | (18,375,650 | ) | — | 135,869 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Gateway Fund | 23,748,181 | 454,687 | (2,051,319 | ) | 22,771,561 | 452,414 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 23,031,702 | 77,333,283 | (5,416,209 | ) | 94,928,827 | 577,673 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Invesco Growth and Income Fund | 29,244,633 | 3,145,962 | (31,177,642 | ) | — | 623,633 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Invesco International Equity Fund | 35,302,480 | 1,968,610 | (35,399,075 | ) | — | 596,037 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL JPMorgan International Opportunities Fund | 41,138,740 | 1,789,563 | (40,685,394 | ) | — | 492,334 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL JPMorgan U.S. Equity Fund | 41,104,543 | 3,777,540 | (42,793,022 | ) | — | 305,184 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MetWest Total Return Bond Fund | 131,131,192 | 2,830,036 | (26,469,738 | ) | 108,689,445 | 1,423,260 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MFS Investors Trust Fund | 17,782,165 | 2,012,424 | (18,527,819 | ) | — | 109,588 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MFS Mid Cap Value Fund | 11,763,400 | 835,107 | (12,755,546 | ) | — | 96,703 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MFS Value Fund | 35,220,247 | 1,015,348 | (37,729,543 | ) | — | 656,232 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 11,691,526 | 35,362,211 | (5,561,857 | ) | 44,835,598 | 114,900 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Morgan Stanley Global Real Estate Fund | 17,842,604 | 245,403 | (18,390,502 | ) | — | 243,698 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Fund | 11,480,951 | 1,184,265 | (11,255,316 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Global Equity Index Fund | 22,123,729 | 1,821,427 | (22,129,474 | ) | — | 606,083 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Oppenheimer Discovery Fund | 22,692,149 | 3,479,686 | (24,103,809 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Pyramis Total Bond Fund | 131,393,263 | 4,624,913 | (30,436,573 | ) | 108,691,698 | 4,094,133 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund, Class 2 | 20,714,157 | 99,351,306 | (7,169,567 | ) | 112,766,586 | 195,467 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Russell 1000 Value Index Fund, Class 2 | 49,813,499 | 72,391,877 | (16,465,724 | ) | 112,980,337 | 852,351 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund | — | 16,828,906 | (1,660,208 | ) | 17,436,434 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund | 17,753,139 | 17,996 | (17,454,044 | ) | — | 16,291 | |||||||||||||||||||
NFJ Dividend Value Portfolio | 17,517,968 | 1,188,817 | (18,426,381 | ) | — | 354,104 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Global Advantage Strategy Bond Portfolio | 12,037,749 | 40,450 | (12,453,473 | ) | — | 38,769 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT High Yield Portfolio | 35,523,393 | 866,388 | (37,980,391 | ) | — | 842,387 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Income Portfolio | — | 59,493,586 | (4,349,686 | ) | 56,097,198 | 2,076,493 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Low Duration Portfolio | 70,809,315 | 983,422 | (16,149,731 | ) | 55,631,939 | 967,543 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Real Return Portfolio | 47,251,691 | 438,691 | (49,907,843 | ) | — | 433,647 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Total Return Portfolio | 130,913,717 | 2,667,676 | (25,667,923 | ) | 109,124,850 | 2,537,245 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,113,277,176 | $ | 559,305,534 | $ | (637,484,419 | ) | $ | 1,047,753,518 | $ | 19,262,006 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair values services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $11,650 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
10
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments in other investment companies are valued at their published net asset value (“NAV”). Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board” or “Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). The investments utilizing Level 1 valuations represent investments in open-end investment companies. Futures contracts are valued at the last sales price as of the close of the primary exchange and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Company | $ | 1,047,753,518 | $ | — | $ | 1,047,753,518 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | 1,047,753,518 | — | 1,047,753,518 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments:* | |||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | (117,096 | ) | — | (117,096 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 1,047,636,422 | $ | — | $ | 1,047,636,422 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Other Financial Instruments would include any derivative instruments, such as futures contracts. These investments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the investment. |
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund | $ | 559,305,534 | $ | 637,484,419 |
6. Investment Risks
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest directly or through affiliated or unaffiliated mutual funds or unregistered investment pools in derivative instruments such as futures, options, and options on futures. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The other party to a derivatives contract could default.
7. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
11
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Cost of securities for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $1,011,429,981. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 45,989,559 | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (9,666,022 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | 36,323,537 | ||
|
|
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund | $ | 25,843,598 | $ | 55,908,893 | $ | 81,752,491 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund | $ | 18,065,942 | $ | 47,784,798 | $ | 65,850,740 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund | $ | 18,502,974 | $ | 99,533,602 | $ | — | $ | 36,323,537 | $ | 154,360,113 |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
8. Ownership and Principal Holders
The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a fund creates presumptions of controlof the fund, under section 2 (a)(9) of the 1940 Act. As of December 31, 2016, the Fund had an individual shareholder account which is affiliated with the Investment Adviser representing ownership in excess of 90% of the Fund.
9. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies - Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN - also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
10. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
12
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund (formerly, AZL MVP Fusion Balanced Fund) (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with brokers and transfer agents of the underlying funds. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Balanced Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
13
Other Federal Income Tax Information (Unaudited)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, 18.50% of the total ordinary income dividends paid by the Fund qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net long-term capital gain distributions of $55,908,893.
14
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (‘‘Commission’’) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
16
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
17
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. | |||||
Interested Trustees(3)
| ||||||||||
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
18
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 54 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 48 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without charge, by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197.
19
The Allianz VIP Fund of Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. | ||
These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Conservative Fund
(formerly AZL MVP FusionSM Conservative Fund)
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 5
Statement of Operations
Page 5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 6
Financial Highlights
Page 7
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 13
Other Federal Income Tax Information
Page 14
Other Information
Page 15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 16
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 18
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Conservative Fund Review (unaudited)
(formerly AZL MVP FusionSM Conservative Fund)
Allianz Investment Management LLC serves as Manager for the AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Conservative Fund.
What factors affected the Fund’s performance during the year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Conservative Fund (the “Fund”) returned 5.32%. That compared to a 11.96%, 2.65% and a 5.89% total return for its benchmarks, the S&P 500 Index1, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, and the Conservative Composite Index1, respectively.
The Fund is a fund of funds that achieves broad diversification by investing in underlying funds. The Fund typically holds between 25% and 45% of its assets in equity funds and 55% to 75% of its assets in fixed-income funds. The Fund also employs the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process, which is intended to adjust the risk of the portfolio based on quantitative indicators of market risk, such as the current level of fund and market volatility.*
Overall, 2016 brought a favorable economic backdrop for stocks. Major equity categories posted gains during the period under review, as U.S. economic growth remained steady, corporate earnings in most sectors proved robust, central banks in many major economies continued to pursue accommodative strategies, and merger activity increased. Even so, the path of equity returns was not linear. For example, global markets declined sharply following Britain’s June vote to leave the European Union, but stocks recovered quickly. Meanwhile, U.S. equities posted particularly strong gains during a year-end rally after Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election. The S&P 500 Index gained 11.96% during the period while the MSCI EAFE Index2, burdened in part by the impact of a strengthening dollar, rose 1.00%.
Fixed-income markets were generally positive during the period under review. The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate for the second time in a decade and indicated that more rate hikes are likely in 2017. Spreads between U.S. Treasuries and corporate bonds tightened during the year, as investors searched for higher yields. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1 gained 2.65% during the period under review.
The Fund underperformed its composite benchmark during the period under review. This underperformance was primarily due to the Fund’s strategic allocation to international and emerging markets, which broadly lagged domestic stocks during the period. The Fund’s underlying equity portfolios also broadly detracted from relative performance, as the actively managed domestic and international funds struggled to beat their benchmarks. However, the selection of securities within the Fund’s underlying fixed-income portfolios contributed positively to relative performance on an overall basis. An out-of-benchmark allocation to high-yield bonds and a tilt towards small- and mid-cap U.S. stocks also supported relative performance. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index3 returned 17.13% during the period while the S&P 400 Index4 gained 20.74% and the S&P 600 Index5 rose 26.56%.*
The MVP risk management process, which includes the use of derivatives, worked as intended during the period under review and largely maintained a neutral equity allocation for most of the year relative to its target. There were two periods of volatility in 2016 during which the MVP process reduced the Fund’s equity exposure. Global growth concerns led to increased volatility at the start of the year, and volatility returned in mid-2016 as markets grappled with the U.K.’s vote to exit the European Union. In both instances, markets quickly recovered, and the MVP risk management process ultimately dragged on relative performance.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. |
2 | The Morgan Stanley Capital International, Europe, Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. |
3 | Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index measures the USD-denominated, high-yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch and S&P is Ba1/ BB+/BB+ or below. |
4 | The Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (“S&P 400”) is the most widely used index for mid-sized companies. The S&P 400 covers 7% of the U.S. equities market, and is part of a series of S&P U.S. indices that can be used as building blocks for portfolio composition. |
5 | The Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index (“S&P 600”) covers approximately 3% of the domestic equities market. Measuring the small-cap segment of the market that is typically renowned for poor trading liquidity and financial instability, the index is designed to be an efficient portfolio of companies that meet specific inclusion criteria to ensure that they are investable and financially viable. |
Investors cannot invest directly in an index. |
1
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Conservative Fund Review (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation with preservation of capital as an important consideration. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a combination of Permitted Underlying Funds that represent different classes in the Fund’s asset allocation.
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in underlying funds, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of those underlying funds. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by each of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests.
Stocks are more volatile and carry more risk and return potential than other forms of investments.
Emerging market investing may be subject to additional economic, political, liquidity, and currency risks not associated with more developed countries.
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
Small- to mid-capitalization companies typically have a higher risk of failure and historically have experienced a greater degree of volatility.
The performance of the Fund is expected to be lower than that of the Indices because of Fund fees and expenses. Securities in which the Fund will invest may involve substantial risk and may be subject to sudden severe price declines.
Bonds offer a relatively stable level of income, although bond prices will fluctuate, providing the potential for principal gain or loss.
Investing in derivatives instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risk associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional instruments.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark, as well as the two component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016
Since | ||||||||||||||||
1 | 3 | 5 | Inception | |||||||||||||
Year | Year | Year | (10/23/09) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Conservative Fund | 5.32 | % | 3.08 | % | 5.64 | % | 5.76 | % | ||||||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 8.87 | % | 14.66 | % | 13.05 | % | ||||||||
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 2.65 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.23 | % | 3.56 | % | ||||||||
Conservative Composite Index | 5.89 | % | 5.12 | % | 6.58 | % | 7.06 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Conservative Fund | 1.01 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.35% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the Permitted Underlying Funds. Accordingly, Acquired Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.24%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”), the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the Conservative Composite Index (“Composite”). The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value-weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year. The Composite is a blended index comprised of (35%) S&P 500 and (65%) Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,018.20 | $ | 1.22 | 0.24 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,023.93 | $ | 1.22 | 0.24 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Fixed Income | 62.0 | % | |||
Domestic Equities | 23.5 | ||||
International Equities | 9.5 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 95.0 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | 5.0 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
3
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Affiliated Investment Companies (95.0%): |
| ||||||
759,142 | AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund | $ | 6,991,694 | |||||
384,480 | AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund | 4,129,311 | ||||||
241,040 | AZL DFA U.S. Small Cap Fund | 2,752,679 | ||||||
617,777 | AZL Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund, Class 2 | 4,077,330 | ||||||
2,551,755 | AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | 27,227,225 | ||||||
334,808 | AZL Gateway Fund | 4,114,793 | ||||||
1,088,448 | AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 15,347,118 | ||||||
3,599,800 | AZL MetWest Total Return Bond Fund | 36,249,988 | ||||||
385,248 | AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 8,263,574 | ||||||
3,606,977 | AZL Pyramis Total Bond Fund, Class 2 | 36,250,115 | ||||||
1,611,664 | AZL Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund, Class 2 | 20,935,518 | ||||||
1,566,451 | AZL Russell 1000 Value Index Fund, Class 2 | 20,974,784 | ||||||
290,166 | AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund, Class 2 | 4,129,057 | ||||||
1,645,167 | PIMCO PVIT Income Portfolio | 16,764,247 | ||||||
1,909,739 | PIMCO PVIT Low Duration Portfolio | 19,555,728 | ||||||
3,412,276 | PIMCO PVIT Total Return Portfolio | 36,306,623 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Affiliated Investment Companies (Cost $259,849,429) | 264,069,784 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Investment Securities (Cost $259,849,429)(a) — 95.0% | 264,069,784 | ||||||
| Net other assets (liabilities) — 5.0% | 13,818,912 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 277,888,696 | |||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
(a) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
Futures Contracts
Cash of $13,907,075 has been segregated to cover margin requirements for the following open contracts as of December 31, 2016:
Description | Type | Expiration Date | Number of Contracts | Notional Value | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index E-Mini March Futures | Long | 3/17/17 | 43 | $ | 4,807,830 | $ | 9,419 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note March Futures | Long | 3/22/17 | 72 | 8,948,250 | (57,935 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (48,516 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | $ | 259,849,429 | |||
|
| ||||
Investments in affiliates, at value | $ | 264,069,784 | |||
Segregated cash for collateral | 13,907,075 | ||||
Interest and dividends receivable | 123,778 | ||||
Receivable for affiliated investments sold | 606,035 | ||||
Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | 25,140 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 1,483 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 278,733,295 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Cash overdraft | 599,462 | ||||
Payable for affiliated investments purchased | 128,583 | ||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 33,130 | ||||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | 19,538 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 47,506 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 4,684 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 1,289 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 786 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 597 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 9,024 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 844,599 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 277,888,696 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 259,267,159 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | 4,942,255 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | 9,507,443 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | 4,171,839 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 277,888,696 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 23,370,044 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 11.89 | |||
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | |||||
Dividends from affiliates | $ | 5,185,925 | |||
Dividends | 4,846 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Income | 5,190,771 | ||||
|
| ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Manager fees | 555,362 | ||||
Administration fees | 53,292 | ||||
Custodian fees | 2,460 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 4,665 | ||||
Trustee fees | 15,762 | ||||
Professional fees | 11,855 | ||||
Shareholder reports | 7,498 | ||||
Other expenses | 5,751 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total expenses | 656,645 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 4,534,126 | ||||
|
| ||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions from affiliates | 5,647,705 | ||||
Net realized gains distributions from affiliated underlying funds | 5,920,403 | ||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts | 399,793 | ||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | (2,100,279 | ) | |||
|
| ||||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 9,867,622 | ||||
|
| ||||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 14,401,748 | |||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||
Change In Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 4,534,126 | $ | 5,684,817 | ||||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | 11,967,901 | 8,963,969 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | (2,100,279 | ) | (16,648,582 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 14,401,748 | (1,999,796 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||
From net investment income | (6,400,135 | ) | (3,752,335 | ) | ||||||
From net realized gains | (8,746,642 | ) | (9,193,525 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | (15,146,777 | ) | (12,945,860 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 54,291,335 | 42,452,840 | ||||||||
Proceeds from dividends reinvested | 15,146,777 | 12,945,860 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (59,139,549 | ) | (43,561,306 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | 10,298,563 | 11,837,394 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | 9,553,534 | (3,108,262 | ) | |||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 268,335,162 | 271,443,424 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 277,888,696 | $ | 268,335,162 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | 4,942,255 | $ | 6,400,113 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 4,563,032 | 3,390,900 | ||||||||
Dividends reinvested | 1,281,453 | 1,085,152 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (4,973,216 | ) | (3,460,860 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | 871,269 | 1,015,192 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund
Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 11.93 | $ | 12.63 | $ | 12.53 | $ | 11.99 | $ | 11.05 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Investment Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 0.44 | (0.35 | ) | 0.44 | 0.78 | 1.10 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 0.63 | (0.10 | ) | 0.60 | 0.94 | 1.24 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders From: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | (0.28 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (0.27 | ) | (0.20 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains | (0.39 | ) | (0.43 | ) | (0.31 | ) | (0.13 | ) | (0.10 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Dividends | (0.67 | ) | (0.60 | ) | (0.50 | ) | (0.40 | ) | (0.30 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 11.89 | $ | 11.93 | $ | 12.63 | $ | 12.53 | $ | 11.99 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Return(a) | 5.32 | % | (0.77 | )% | 4.81 | % | 7.96 | % | 11.27 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 277,889 | $ | 268,335 | $ | 271,443 | $ | 265,232 | $ | 253,325 | |||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 1.63 | % | 2.09 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.29 | % | 1.65 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Before Reductions*(b) | 0.24 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.25 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions* | 0.24 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.20 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate(c) | 62 | % | 16 | % | 36 | % | 15 | % | 36 | % |
* | The expense ratios exclude the impact of fees/expenses paid by each underlying fund. |
(a) | The returns include reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but exclude insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(b) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
(c) | The portfolio turnover rate can be volatile due to the amount and timing of purchases and sales of fund shares during the period. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
7
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services - Investment Companies. The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund (formerly, AZL MVP Fusion Conservative Fund) (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold and on foreign currency transactions are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, reclassification of certain market discounts, gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust.
Derivative Instruments
All open derivative positions at period end are reflected on the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The following is a description of the derivative instruments utilized by the Fund, including the primary underlying risk exposures related to each instrument type. The Fund’s allocation to the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process may include (a) derivatives such as index futures, other futures contracts, options, and other similar securities and (b) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large redemptions and any margin calls. Due to the leverage provided by derivatives, the notional value of the Fund’s derivative positions could exceed 20% of the Fund’s value. The Fund may also use futures to gain equity exposure and may hold cash as a buffer in the event of market shocks.
8
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Futures Contracts
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund invested in futures contracts to reduce volatility and limit the need to decrease or increase allocations to underlying funds. Futures contracts are valued based upon their quoted daily settlement prices. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to segregate liquid assets in accordance with the initial margin requirements of the broker or exchange. Futures contracts are marked to market daily and a payable or receivable for the change in value (“variation margin”) is recorded by the Fund. Gains or losses are recognized but not considered realized until the contracts expire or are closed. Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock futures, interest rate risk related to bond futures, and foreign currency risk related to currency futures) and exposure to loss in excess of the variation margin disclosed in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between the change in fair value of the underlying securities and the prices of futures contracts, the possibility of an illiquid market, and the inability of the counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The notional amount of futures contracts outstanding was $13.8 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average notional amount for these contracts was $13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Realized gains and losses are reported as “Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts” on the Statement of Operations.
Summary of Derivative Instruments
The following is a summary of the fair values of derivative instruments on the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, categorized by risk exposure, as of December 31, 2016:
Asset Derivative | Liability Derivative | |||||||||||
Primary Risk Exposure | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | ||||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | 9,419 | Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | — | ||||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | — | 57,935 |
* | For futures contracts, the amounts represent the cumulative appreciation/depreciation of these futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Portfolio Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as variation margin on futures contracts. |
The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations, categorized by risk exposure, for the year ended December 31, 2016:
Primary Risk Exposure | Location of Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized in Income | Realized Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized | Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized | |||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Net Realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts/Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | $ | 359,680 | $ | 5,220 | |||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | 40,113 | (17,432 | ) |
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018. Expenses incurred for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.”
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund | 0.20 | % | 0.35 | % |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.” At December 31, 2016, there were no remaining contractual reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years.
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the period can be found on the Statement of Operations. During year ended December 31, 2016, there were no voluntary waivers.
9
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund | $ | 2,667,296 | $ | 749,978 | $ | (3,157,544 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
AZL Boston Company Research Growth Fund | 2,676,961 | 876,307 | (3,132,170 | ) | — | 7,848 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund | — | 7,304,044 | (420,982 | ) | 6,991,694 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund | 2,642,702 | 1,979,625 | (960,174 | ) | 4,129,311 | 26,325 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA U.S. Small Cap Fund | — | 2,912,152 | (537,857 | ) | 2,752,679 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund, Class 2 | — | 4,267,433 | — | 4,077,330 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | — | 28,927,404 | (897,088 | ) | 27,227,225 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Federated Clover Small Cap Value Fund | 3,989,301 | 973,146 | (5,070,862 | ) | — | 33,659 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Gateway Fund | 4,074,260 | 506,294 | (576,789 | ) | 4,114,793 | 84,421 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 5,342,590 | 12,896,347 | (2,865,962 | ) | 15,347,118 | 143,286 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Invesco Growth and Income Fund | 6,665,181 | 2,228,430 | (8,623,445 | ) | — | 154,718 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Invesco International Equity Fund | 5,358,332 | 1,369,479 | (6,441,255 | ) | — | 98,471 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL JPMorgan International Opportunities Fund | 5,342,377 | 1,401,400 | (6,467,744 | ) | — | 69,800 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL JPMorgan U.S. Equity Fund | 6,680,672 | 1,984,122 | (8,319,345 | ) | — | 54,236 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MetWest Total Return Bond Fund | 37,397,862 | 7,516,291 | (8,913,629 | ) | 36,249,988 | 442,087 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MFS Investors Trust Fund | 2,670,812 | 712,104 | (3,178,927 | ) | — | 18,084 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MFS Mid Cap Value Fund | 2,645,872 | 599,081 | (3,288,272 | ) | — | 23,950 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MFS Value Fund | 7,999,665 | 1,557,986 | (9,923,447 | ) | — | 162,911 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 2,641,953 | 6,787,322 | (1,771,878 | ) | 8,263,574 | 28,445 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Morgan Stanley Global Real Estate Fund | 2,708,491 | 423,342 | (3,179,246 | ) | — | 40,511 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Fund | 2,718,779 | 857,094 | (3,264,847 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Oppenheimer Discovery Fund | 5,306,190 | 2,149,173 | (6,993,157 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Pyramis Total Bond Fund | 37,473,948 | 7,069,317 | (9,083,668 | ) | 36,250,115 | 1,271,958 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund, Class 2 | 1,667,655 | 21,028,645 | (2,078,107 | ) | 20,935,518 | 17,268 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Russell 1000 Value Index Fund, Class 2 | 8,350,464 | 15,754,038 | (4,532,909 | ) | 20,974,784 | 155,663 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund | — | 4,368,228 | (796,003 | ) | 4,129,057 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund | 2,655,401 | 548,154 | (3,175,508 | ) | — | 2,678 | |||||||||||||||||||
NFJ Dividend Value Portfolio | 4,012,969 | 917,749 | (4,873,649 | ) | — | 84,476 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Global Advantage Strategy Bond Portfolio | 2,701,480 | 45,436 | (2,830,725 | ) | — | 8,789 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT High Yield Portfolio | 13,546,724 | 922,557 | (15,122,423 | ) | — | 353,008 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Income Portfolio | — | 18,190,276 | (1,697,340 | ) | 16,764,247 | 621,309 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Low Duration Portfolio | 24,192,395 | 4,026,364 | (8,662,318 | ) | 19,555,728 | 347,842 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Real Return Portfolio | 13,498,545 | 993,206 | (15,157,921 | ) | — | 154,878 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Total Return Portfolio | 37,387,202 | 7,393,052 | (8,746,318 | ) | 36,306,623 | 779,304 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | 255,016,079 | $ | 170,235,576 | $ | (164,741,509 | ) | $ | 264,069,784 | $ | 5,185,925 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair values services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $2,831 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
10
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments in other investment companies are valued at their published net asset value (“NAV”). Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the ”Board” or “Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). The investments utilizing Level 1 valuations represent investments in open-end investment companies. Futures contracts are valued at the last sales price as of the close of the primary exchange and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Company | $ | 264,069,784 | $ | — | $ | 264,069,784 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | 264,069,784 | — | 264,069,784 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments:* | |||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | (48,516 | ) | — | (48,516 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 264,021,268 | $ | — | $ | 264,021,268 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Other Financial Instruments would include any derivative instruments, such as futures contracts. These investments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the investment. |
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund | $ | 170,235,576 | $ | 164,741,509 |
6. Investment Risks
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest directly or through affiliated or unaffiliated mutual funds or unregistered investment pools in derivative instruments such as futures, options, and options on futures. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The other party to a derivatives contract could default.
7. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
11
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Cost of securities for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $261,622,152. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 6,768,381 | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (4,320,749 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | 2,447,632 | ||
|
|
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund | $ | 6,400,135 | $ | 8,746,642 | $ | 15,146,777 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund | $ | 4,227,038 | $ | 8,718,822 | $ | 12,945,860 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund | $ | 5,491,942 | $ | 10,681,963 | $ | — | $ | 2,447,632 | $ | 18,621,537 |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
8. Ownership and Principal Holders
The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a fund creates presumptions of control of the fund, under section 2 (a)(9) of the 1940 Act. As of December 31, 2016, the Fund had an individual shareholder account which is affiliated with the Investment Adviser representing ownership in excess of 90% of the Fund.
9. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies - Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN - also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
10. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
12
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund (formerly, AZL MVP Fusion Conservative Fund) (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with brokers and transfer agents of the underlying funds. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Conservative Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
13
Other Federal Income Tax Information (Unaudited)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, 14.00% of the total ordinary income dividends paid by the Fund qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net long-term capital gain distributions of $8,746,642.
14
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (‘‘Commission’’) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
16
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
17
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. | |||||
Interested Trustees(3)
| ||||||||||
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
18
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 54 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 48 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without
charge, | by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197. |
19
The Allianz VIP Fund of Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. | ||
These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Moderate Fund
(formerly AZL MVP FusionSM Moderate Fund)
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 5
Statement of Operations
Page 5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 6
Financial Highlights
Page 7
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 13
Other Federal Income Tax Information
Page 14
Other Information
Page 15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 16
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 18
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Moderate Fund Review (unaudited)
(formerly AZL MVP FusionSM Moderate Fund)
Allianz Investment Management LLC serves as the Manager for the MVP FusionSM Dynamic Moderate Fund.
What factors affected the Fund’s performance during the year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Moderate Fund (the “Fund”) returned 4.29%. That compared to a 11.96%, 2.65% and a 8.21% total return for its benchmarks, the S&P 500 Index1, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, and the Moderate Composite Index1, respectively.
The Fund is a fund of funds that achieves broad diversification by investing in underlying funds. The Fund typically holds between 50% and 70% of its assets in equity funds and 30% to 50% of its assets in fixed-income funds. The Fund also employs the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process, which is intended to adjust the risk of the portfolio based on quantitative indicators of market risk, such as the current level of fund and market volatility.*
Overall, 2016 brought a favorable economic backdrop for stocks. Major equity categories posted gains during the period under review, as U.S. economic growth remained steady, corporate earnings in most sectors proved robust, central banks in many major economies continued to pursue accommodative strategies, and merger activity increased. Even so, the path of equity returns was not linear. For example, global markets declined sharply following Britain’s June vote to leave the European Union, but stocks recovered quickly. Meanwhile, U.S. equities posted particularly strong gains during a year-end rally after Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election. The S&P 500 Index gained 11.96% during the period while the MSCI EAFE Index2, burdened in part by the impact of a strengthening dollar, rose 1.00%.
Fixed-income markets were generally positive during the period under review. The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate for the second time in a decade and indicated that more rate hikes are likely in 2017. Spreads between U.S. Treasuries and corporate bonds tightened during the year, as investors searched for higher yields. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index gained 2.65% during the period under review.
The Fund underperformed its composite benchmark during the period under review. This underperformance was primarily due to the Fund’s strategic allocation to international and emerging markets, which broadly lagged domestic stocks during the period. The Fund’s underlying equity portfolios also broadly detracted from relative performance, as the actively managed domestic and international funds struggled to beat their benchmarks. However, the selection of securities within the Fund’s underlying fixed-income portfolios contributed positively to relative performance on an overall basis. An out-of-benchmark allocation to high-yield bonds and a tilt towards small- and mid-cap U.S. stocks also supported relative performance. The Bloomberg Barclays Corporate U.S. High Yield Bond Index3 returned 17.13% during the period while the S&P 400 Index4 gained 20.74% and the S&P 600 Index5 rose 26.56%.*
The MVP risk management process, which includes the use of derivatives, worked as intended during the period under review and largely maintained a neutral equity allocation for most of the year relative to its target. There were two periods of volatility in 2016 during which the MVP process reduced the Fund’s equity exposure. Global growth concerns led to increased volatility at the start of the year, and volatility returned in mid-2016 as markets grappled with the U.K.’s vote to exit the European Union. In both instances, markets quickly recovered, and the MVP risk management process ultimately dragged on relative performance.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. |
2 | The Morgan Stanley Capital International, Europe, Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. |
3 | Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield Bond Index measures the USD-denominated, high yield, fixed-rate corporate bond market. Securities are classified as high yield if the middle rating of Moody’s, Fitch and S&P is Ba1/ BB+/BB+ or below. |
4 | The Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (“S&P 400”) is the most widely used index for mid-sized companies. The S&P 400 covers 7% of the U.S. equities market, and is part of a series of S&P U.S. indices that can be used as building blocks for portfolio composition. |
5 | The Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index (“S&P 600”) covers approximately 3% of the domestic equities market. Measuring the small-cap segment of the market that is typically renowned for poor trading liquidity and financial instability, the index is designed to be an efficient portfolio of companies that meet specific inclusion criteria to ensure that they are investable and financially viable. |
Investors cannot invest directly in an index. |
1
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Moderate Fund Review (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a combination of Permitted Underlying Funds that represent different classes in the Fund’s asset allocation.
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in underlying funds, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of those underlying funds. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by each of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests.
Emerging market investing may be subject to additional economic, political, liquidity, and currency risks not associated with more developed countries.
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
Returns on growth stocks may not move in tandem with returns on other categories of stocks or the market as a whole. Growth stocks may be susceptible to rapid price savings or to adverse developments in certain sectors of the market.
Small- to mid-capitalization companies typically have a higher risk of failure and historically have experienced a greater degree of volatility.
The performance of the Fund is expected to be lower than that of the Indices because of Fund fees and expenses. Securities in which the Fund will invest may involve substantial risk and may be subject to sudden severe price declines.
Debt securities held by the Fund may decline in value due to rising interest rates. Interest rates in the U.S. are at, or near, historic lows, which may increase the Fund’s exposure to risks related to rising rates.
Bonds offer a relatively stable level of income, although bond prices will fluctuate, providing the potential for principal gain or loss.
Investing in derivatives instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risk associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional instruments.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark, as well as the two component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016
1 | 3 | 5 | 10 | |||||||||||||
Year | Year | Year | Year | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Moderate Fund | 4.29 | % | 2.23 | % | 6.73 | % | 3.38 | % | ||||||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 8.87 | % | 14.66 | % | 6.95 | % | ||||||||
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 2.65 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.23 | % | 4.34 | % | ||||||||
Moderate Composite Index | 8.21 | % | 6.58 | % | 9.68 | % | 6.30 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL MVP FusionSM Dynamic Moderate Fund | 0.96 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.30% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the Permitted Underlying Funds. Accordingly, Acquired Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.22%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”), the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the Moderate Composite Index (“Composite”). The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value-weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year. The Composite is a blended index comprised of (60%) S&P 500 and (40%) Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,032.70 | $ | 1.12 | 0.22 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,024.03 | $ | 1.12 | 0.22 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Domestic Equities | 39.4 | % | |||
Fixed Income | 37.6 | ||||
International Equities | 19.1 | ||||
Money Market | — | ^ | |||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 96.1 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | 3.9 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
^ | Represents less than 0.05% |
3
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Affiliated Investment Companies (96.1%): |
| ||||||
12,969,550 | AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund | $ | 119,449,559 | |||||
5,868,338 | AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund | 63,025,952 | ||||||
4,548,644 | AZL DFA U.S. Small Cap Fund | 51,945,519 | ||||||
13,721,246 | AZL Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund, Class 2 | 90,560,225 | ||||||
13,301,598 | AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | 141,928,054 | ||||||
4,876,633 | AZL Gateway Fund | 59,933,815 | ||||||
16,757,203 | AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 236,276,569 | ||||||
18,860,351 | AZL MetWest Total Return Bond Fund | 189,923,737 | ||||||
5,725,458 | AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 122,811,070 | ||||||
18,723,813 | AZL Pyramis Total Bond Fund, Class 2 | 188,174,316 | ||||||
22,028,992 | AZL Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund, Class 2 | 286,156,605 | ||||||
21,411,420 | AZL Russell 1000 Value Index Fund, Class 2 | 286,698,914 | ||||||
3,658,700 | AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund, Class 2 | 52,063,304 |
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
| Affiliated Investment Companies, continued |
| ||||||
9,398,496 | PIMCO PVIT Income Portfolio | $ | 95,770,673 | |||||
6,873,208 | PIMCO PVIT Low Duration Portfolio | 70,381,649 | ||||||
17,920,944 | PIMCO PVIT Total Return Portfolio | 190,678,846 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Affiliated Investment Companies (Cost $2,151,660,143) | 2,245,778,807 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Unaffiliated Investment Company (0.0%): |
| ||||||
72,032 | Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management Fund, Institutional Shares, 0.31%(a) | 72,032 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Unaffiliated Investment Company (Cost $72,032) | 72,032 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Investment Securities | |||||||
| (Cost $2,151,732,175)(b) — 96.1% | 2,245,850,839 | ||||||
| Net other assets (liabilities) — 3.9% | 90,482,063 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 2,336,332,902 | |||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
(a) | The rate represents the effective yield at December 31, 2016. |
(b) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
Futures Contracts
Cash of $91,469,571 has been segregated to cover margin requirements for the following open contracts as of December 31, 2016:
Description | Type | Expiration Date | Number of Contracts | Notional Value | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index E-Mini March Futures | Long | 3/17/17 | 487 | $ | 54,451,470 | $ | 109,504 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note March Futures | Long | 3/22/17 | 295 | 36,662,969 | (220,966 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (111,462 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investments in non-affiliates, at cost | $ | 72,032 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | 2,151,660,143 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at cost | $ | 2,151,732,175 | |||
|
| ||||
Investments in non-affiliates, at value | $ | 72,032 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at value | 2,245,778,807 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at value | $ | 2,245,850,839 | |||
Cash | 3,616 | ||||
Segregated cash for collateral | 91,469,571 | ||||
Interest and dividends receivable | 630,289 | ||||
Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | 101,851 | ||||
Receivable for affiliated investments sold | 116,337 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 12,883 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 2,338,185,386 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Payable for affiliated investments purchased | 760,826 | ||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 390,261 | ||||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | 217,491 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 396,167 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 5,976 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 2,600 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 6,713 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 5,098 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 67,352 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 1,852,484 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 2,336,332,902 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 2,026,156,371 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | 36,718,833 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | 179,450,496 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | 94,007,202 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 2,336,332,902 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 201,477,721 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 11.60 | |||
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | |||||
Dividends from affiliates | $ | 37,750,495 | |||
Dividends | 27,422 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Income | 37,777,917 | ||||
|
| ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Manager fees | 4,735,672 | ||||
Administration fees | 68,988 | ||||
Custodian fees | 4,501 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 40,519 | ||||
Trustee fees | 136,689 | ||||
Professional fees | 101,337 | ||||
Shareholder reports | 48,663 | ||||
Other expenses | 50,763 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total expenses | 5,187,132 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 32,590,785 | ||||
|
| ||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: |
| ||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions from affiliates | 173,320,256 | ||||
Net realized gains distributions from affiliated underlying funds | 78,130,932 | ||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts | (29,670,647 | ) | |||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | (156,827,299 | ) | |||
|
| ||||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 64,953,242 | ||||
|
| ||||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 97,544,027 | |||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||
Change In Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 32,590,785 | $ | 42,580,237 | ||||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | 221,780,541 | 159,251,263 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | (156,827,299 | ) | (245,260,925 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 97,544,027 | (43,429,425 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||
From net investment income | (50,970,662 | ) | (33,171,485 | ) | ||||||
From net realized gains | (148,289,923 | ) | (99,506,982 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | (199,260,585 | ) | (132,678,467 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 18,219,768 | 21,944,038 | ||||||||
Proceeds from dividends reinvested | 199,260,585 | 132,678,467 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (245,864,524 | ) | (236,492,530 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | (28,384,171 | ) | (81,870,025 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | (130,100,729 | ) | (257,977,917 | ) | ||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 2,466,433,631 | 2,724,411,548 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 2,336,332,902 | $ | 2,466,433,631 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | 36,718,833 | $ | 50,970,543 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 1,563,579 | 1,694,159 | ||||||||
Dividends reinvested | 17,509,717 | 10,956,108 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (20,672,967 | ) | (18,282,963 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | (1,599,671 | ) | (5,632,696 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund
Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 12.15 | $ | 13.05 | $ | 12.68 | $ | 11.17 | $ | 10.09 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Investment Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 0.32 | (0.45 | ) | 0.40 | 1.57 | 1.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 0.50 | (0.23 | ) | 0.54 | 1.68 | 1.26 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders From: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | (0.27 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.18 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains | (0.78 | ) | (0.50 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Dividends | (1.05 | ) | (0.67 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.17 | ) | (0.18 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 11.60 | $ | 12.15 | $ | 13.05 | $ | 12.68 | $ | 11.17 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Return(a) | 4.29 | % | (1.71 | )% | 4.24 | % | 15.17 | % | 12.53 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 2,336,333 | $ | 2,466,434 | $ | 2,724,412 | $ | 2,753,188 | $ | 2,068,583 | |||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 1.38 | % | 1.61 | % | 1.04 | % | 1.22 | % | 1.34 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Before Reductions*(b) | 0.22 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.23 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions* | 0.22 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.22 | % | 0.21 | % | 0.18 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate(c) | 58 | % | 13 | % | 20 | % | 5 | % | 23 | % |
* | The expense ratios exclude the impact of fees/expenses paid by each underlying fund. |
(a) | The returns include reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but exclude insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(b) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
(c) | The portfolio turnover rate can be volatile due to the amount and timing of purchases and sales of fund shares during the period. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
7
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services - Investment Companies. The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund (formerly, AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund) (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold and on foreign currency transactions are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, reclassification of certain market discounts, gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust.
Derivative Instruments
All open derivative positions at period end are reflected on the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The following is a description of the derivative instruments utilized by the Fund, including the primary underlying risk exposures related to each instrument type. The Fund’s allocation to the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process may include (a) derivatives such as index futures, other futures contracts, options, and other similar securities and (b) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large redemptions and any margin calls. Due to the leverage provided by derivatives, the notional value of the Fund’s derivative positions could exceed 20% of the Fund’s value. The Fund may also use futures to gain equity exposure and may hold cash as a buffer in the event of market shocks.
8
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Futures Contracts
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund invested in futures contracts to reduce volatility and limit the need to decrease or increase allocations to underlying funds. Futures contracts are valued based upon their quoted daily settlement prices. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to segregate liquid assets in accordance with the initial margin requirements of the broker or exchange. Futures contracts are marked to market daily and a payable or receivable for the change in value (“variation margin”) is recorded by the Fund. Gains or losses are recognized but not considered realized until the contracts expire or are closed. Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock futures, interest rate risk related to bond futures, and foreign currency risk related to currency futures) and exposure to loss in excess of the variation margin disclosed in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between the change in fair value of the underlying securities and the prices of futures contracts, the possibility of an illiquid market, and the inability of the counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The notional amount of futures contracts outstanding was $91.1 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average notional amount for these contracts was $128.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Realized gains and losses are reported as “Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts” on the Statement of Operations.
Summary of Derivative Instruments
The following is a summary of the fair values of derivative instruments on the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, categorized by risk exposure, as of December 31, 2016:
Asset Derivative | Liability Derivative | |||||||||||
Primary Risk Exposure | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | ||||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | 109,504 | Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | — | ||||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | — | 220,966 |
* | For futures contracts, the amounts represent the cumulative appreciation/depreciation of these futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Portfolio Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as variation margin on futures contracts. |
The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations, categorized by risk exposure, for the year ended December 31, 2016:
Primary Risk Exposure | Location of Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized in Income | Realized Gains/(Losses) Recognized | Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized | |||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Net Realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts/Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | $ | (30,093,783 | ) | $ | 50,077 | ||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | 423,136 | (44,004 | ) |
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018. Expenses incurred for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.”
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund | 0.20 | % | 0.30 | % |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.” At December 31, 2016, there were no remaining contractual reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years.
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the period can be found on the Statement of Operations. During year ended December 31, 2016, there were no voluntary waivers.
9
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL BlackRock Capital Appreciation Fund | $ | 50,328,837 | $ | 5,037,209 | $ | (50,502,999 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
AZL Boston Company Research Growth Fund | 50,337,874 | 7,830,124 | (50,700,218 | ) | — | 135,085 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund | 49,437,510 | 71,632,999 | (3,723,526 | ) | 119,449,559 | 547,641 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund | 37,827,249 | 23,556,518 | (4,746,062 | ) | 63,025,952 | 341,402 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL DFA U.S. Small Cap Fund | 48,891,631 | 360,097 | (8,173,876 | ) | 51,945,519 | 213,065 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | — | 148,085,483 | (2,223,096 | ) | 141,928,054 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Federated Clover Small Cap Value Fund | 37,135,743 | 1,625,263 | (39,491,994 | ) | — | 291,737 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Gateway Fund | 62,902,297 | 1,286,236 | (5,875,721 | ) | 59,933,815 | 1,205,204 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 73,591,005 | 168,449,665 | (5,270,944 | ) | 236,276,569 | 1,847,698 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Invesco Growth and Income Fund | 74,869,579 | 8,050,881 | (79,777,468 | ) | — | 1,597,393 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Invesco International Equity Fund | 123,843,714 | 6,969,710 | (124,126,397 | ) | — | 2,113,885 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL JPMorgan International Opportunities Fund | 148,517,692 | 4,362,903 | (144,685,930 | ) | — | 1,795,095 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL JPMorgan U.S. Equity Fund | 99,561,222 | 9,187,497 | (103,615,880 | ) | — | 743,031 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MetWest Total Return Bond Fund | 184,042,489 | 20,697,599 | (15,620,660 | ) | 189,923,737 | 1,994,692 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MFS Investors Trust Fund | 50,196,448 | 5,728,474 | (52,297,134 | ) | — | 312,214 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MFS Mid Cap Value Fund | 37,659,270 | 2,676,947 | (40,814,120 | ) | — | 310,405 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL MFS Value Fund | 87,233,557 | 2,515,453 | (93,386,494 | ) | — | 1,631,246 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 25,256,049 | 98,185,642 | (9,901,978 | ) | 122,811,070 | 247,355 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Morgan Stanley Global Real Estate Fund | 50,337,373 | 692,134 | (51,841,943 | ) | — | 692,134 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Fund | 36,501,500 | 3,322,392 | (35,294,471 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Global Equity Index Fund | 67,686,831 | 1,753,553 | (63,904,508 | ) | — | 1,753,553 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Oppenheimer Discovery Fund | 48,294,451 | 5,881,137 | (49,599,143 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Pyramis Total Bond Fund | 184,410,195 | 23,439,530 | (23,059,365 | ) | 188,174,316 | 5,761,970 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund, Class 2 | 47,138,571 | 249,107,219 | (10,365,094 | ) | 286,156,605 | 447,984 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Russell 1000 Value Index Fund, Class 2 | 96,605,035 | 202,022,912 | (30,811,731 | ) | 286,698,914 | 1,658,450 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund | — | 47,458,552 | (1,822,574 | ) | 52,063,304 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Emerging Markets Equity Index Fund, Class 2 | 22,017,103 | 70,800,274 | (1,194,814 | ) | 90,560,225 | 135,033 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Wells Fargo Large Cap Growth Fund | 50,214,179 | 46,397 | (49,350,337 | ) | — | 46,397 | |||||||||||||||||||
NFJ Dividend Value Portfolio | 49,908,535 | 3,376,047 | (52,459,741 | ) | — | 1,007,043 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Global Advantage Strategy Bond Portfolio | 75,491,591 | 718,227 | (80,025,909 | ) | — | 720,547 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT High Yield Portfolio | 50,382,020 | 1,412,072 | (54,314,154 | ) | — | 1,382,868 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Income Portfolio | — | 100,238,017 | (6,069,961 | ) | 95,770,673 | 3,538,867 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Low Duration Portfolio | 75,392,750 | 1,179,683 | (6,122,676 | ) | 70,381,649 | 1,072,801 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Real Return Portfolio | 75,381,720 | 484,680 | (79,228,925 | ) | — | 483,956 | |||||||||||||||||||
PIMCO PVIT Total Return Portfolio | 183,590,172 | 21,906,781 | (15,370,733 | ) | 190,678,846 | 3,721,744 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | 2,354,984,192 | $ | 1,320,078,307 | $ | (1,445,770,576 | ) | $ | 2,245,778,807 | $ | 37,750,495 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair values services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $24,395 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
10
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments in other investment companies are valued at their published net asset value (“NAV”). Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board” or “Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). The investments utilizing Level 1 valuations represent investments in open-end investment companies. Futures contracts are valued at the last sales price as of the close of the primary exchange and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Company | $ | 2,245,778,807 | $ | — | $ | 2,245,778,807 | |||||||||
Unaffiliated Investment Company | 72,032 | — | 72,032 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | 2,245,850,839 | — | 2,245,850,839 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments:* | |||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | (111,462 | ) | — | (111,462 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 2,245,739,377 | $ | — | $ | 2,245,739,377 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Other Financial Instruments would include any derivative instruments, such as futures contracts. These investments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the investment. |
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund | $ | 1,320,078,307 | $ | 1,445,770,576 |
6. Investment Risks
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest directly or through affiliated or unaffiliated mutual funds or unregistered investment pools in derivative instruments such as futures, options, and options on futures. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The other party to a derivatives contract could default.
7. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
11
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Cost of securities for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $2,158,001,201. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 106,737,058 | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (18,887,420 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | 87,849,638 | ||
|
|
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund | $ | 50,970,662 | $ | 148,289,923 | $ | 199,260,585 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund | $ | 33,171,485 | $ | 99,506,982 | $ | 132,678,467 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund | $ | 36,718,833 | $ | 185,608,061 | $ | — | $ | 87,849,638 | $ | 310,176,532 |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
8. Ownership and Principal Holders
The beneficial ownership, either directly or indirectly, of more than 25% of the voting securities of a fund creates presumptions of control of the fund, under section 2 (a)(9) of the 1940 Act. As of December 31, 2016, the Fund had a controlling interest (in excess of 50%) in the AZL MetWest Total Return Bond Fund, which is affiliated with the Investment Adviser.
9. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies - Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN - also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
10. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
12
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund (formerly, AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund) (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and transfer agents of the underlying funds. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL MVP Fusion Dynamic Moderate Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the years in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
13
Other Federal Income Tax Information (Unaudited)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, 22.71% of the total ordinary income dividends paid by the Fund qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net long-term capital gain distributions of $148,289,923.
14
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (‘‘Commission’’) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
16
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
17
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. | |||||
Interested Trustees(3)
| ||||||||||
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
18
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 54 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 48 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without charge, by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197.
19
The Allianz VIP Fund of Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. | ||
These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
AZL® MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 5
Statement of Operations
Page 5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 6
Financial Highlights
Page 7
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 13
Other Federal Income Tax Information
Page 14
Other Information
Page 15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 16
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 18
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL® MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Allianz Investment Management LLC serves as the Manager for the AZL® MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund.
What factors affected the Fund’s performance for the year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL® MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) returned 6.80%. That compared to a 11.96%, 2.65% and a 9.62% total return for its benchmarks, the S&P 500 Index1, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, and the Growth Composite Index1, respectively.
The Fund is a fund of funds that pursues broad diversification across four equity sub-portfolios and one fixed-income sub-portfolio. The four equity sub-portfolios pursue passive strategies that aim to achieve, before fees, returns similar to the S&P 500 Index, the S&P 400 Index2, the S&P 600 Index3 and the MSCI EAFE Index4, which represents shares of large companies in developed foreign markets. The fixed-income sub-portfolio is an enhanced bond index strategy that seeks to achieve a return that exceeds that of the Bloomberg Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. Generally, the Fund allocates 65% to 85% of its assets to the underlying equity index funds and between 15% and 35% to the underlying bond index fund.*
The Fund also employs the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process, which is intended to adjust the risk of the portfolio based on quantitative indicators of market risk, such as the current level of fund and market volatility.
Overall, 2016 brought a favorable economic backdrop for stocks. Major equity categories posted gains during the period under review, as U.S. economic growth remained steady, corporate earnings in most sectors proved robust, central banks in many major economies continued to pursue accommodative strategies, and merger activity increased. Even so, the path of equity returns was not linear. For example, global markets declined sharply following Britain’s June vote to leave the European Union, but stocks recovered quickly. Meanwhile, U.S. equities posted particularly strong gains during a year-end rally after Donald Trump’s victory in the U.S. presidential election. The S&P 500 gained 11.96% during the period while the MSCI EAFE, burdened in part by the impact of a strengthening dollar, rose 1.00%.
Fixed-income markets were generally positive during the period under review. The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate for the second time in a decade and indicated that more rate hikes are likely in 2017. Spreads between U.S. Treasuries and corporate bonds tightened during the year, as investors searched for higher yields. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index gained 2.65% during the period under review.
The Fund underperformed its composite benchmark for the period under review. The underperformance was primarily due to the Fund’s strategic allocation to international equity markets, which broadly lagged domestic stocks during the period. The underlying fixed-income portfolio also lagged its benchmark during the period, detracting further from relative performance. The Fund’s allocations to small- and mid-cap U.S. equities, however, contributed positively to relative returns as they collectively outperformed the larger stocks found in the S&P 500 Index. The S&P 400 Index gained 20.74% during the period while the S&P 600 Index rose 26.56%.*
The MVP risk management process, which includes the use of derivatives, worked as intended during the period under review and largely maintained a neutral equity allocation for most of the year relative to its target. There were two periods of volatility in 2016 during which the MVP process reduced the Fund’s equity exposure. Global growth concerns led to increased volatility at the start of the year, and volatility returned in mid-2016 as markets grappled with the U.K.’s vote to exit the European Union. In both instances, markets quickly recovered, and the MVP risk management process ultimately dragged on relative performance.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. |
2 | The Standard & Poor’s MidCap 400 Index (“S&P 400”) is the most widely used index for mid-sized companies. The S&P 400 covers 7% of the U.S. equities market, and is part of a series of S&P U.S. indices that can be used as building blocks for portfolio composition. |
3 | The Standard & Poor’s SmallCap 600 Index (“S&P 600”) covers approximately 3% of the domestic equities market. Measuring the small-cap segment of the market that is typically renowned for poor trading liquidity and financial instability, the index is designed to be an efficient portfolio of companies that meet specific inclusion criteria to ensure that they are investable and financially viable. |
4 | The Morgan Stanley Capital International, Europe, Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. |
Investors cannot invest directly in an index. |
1
AZL® MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a combination of Index Strategy Underlying Funds that represent different classes in the Fund’s asset allocation.
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in underlying funds, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of those underlying funds. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by each of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests.
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
Small- to mid-capitalization companies typically have a higher risk of failure and historically have experienced a greater degree of volatility.
The performance of the Fund is expected to be lower than that of the Indices because of Fund fees and expenses. Securities in which the Fund will invest may involve substantial risk and may be subject to sudden severe price declines.
Bonds offer a relatively stable level of income, although bond prices will fluctuate, providing the potential for principal gain or loss.
Investing in derivatives instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risk associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional instruments.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark as well as the two component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016
Since | ||||||||||||
1 | 3 | Inception | ||||||||||
Year | Year | (1/10/12) | ||||||||||
AZL® MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund | 6.80 | % | 4.10 | % | 8.68 | % | ||||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 8.87 | % | 14.10 | % | ||||||
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 2.65 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.26 | % | ||||||
Growth Composite Index | 9.62 | % | 7.45 | % | 11.15 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL® MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund | 0.69 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.20% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the Permitted Underlying Funds. Accordingly, Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.12%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”), the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the Growth Composite Index (“Composite”). The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value-weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year. The Composite is a blended index comprised of (75%) S&P 500 and (25%) Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,045.60 | $ | 0.62 | 0.12 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,024.53 | $ | 0.61 | 0.12 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Domestic Equities | 53.6 | % | |||
Fixed Income | 23.1 | ||||
International Equities | 18.4 | ||||
Money Market | — | ^ | |||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 95.1 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | 4.9 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
^ | Represents less than 0.05% |
3
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Affiliated Investment Companies (95.1%): | ||||||||
48,576,453 | AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | $ | 518,310,753 | |||||
29,249,324 | AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 412,415,467 | ||||||
11,887,598 | AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 254,988,987 | ||||||
57,917,436 | AZL S&P 500 Index Fund, Class 2 | 814,319,154 | ||||||
9,329,214 | AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund, Class 2 | 132,754,720 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Affiliated Investment Companies (Cost $2,039,308,927) | 2,132,789,081 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Unaffiliated Investment Company (0.0%): | ||||||||
5,857 | Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management Fund Institutional Shares, 0.31%(a) | 5,857 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Unaffiliated Investment Company (Cost $5,857) | 5,857 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
| Total Investment Securities | 2,132,794,938 | ||||||
Net other assets (liabilities) — 4.9% | 110,577,849 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 2,243,372,787 | ||||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
(a) | The rate represents the effective yield at December 31, 2016. |
(b) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
Futures Contracts
Cash of $111,073,150 has been segregated to cover margin requirements for the following open contracts as of December 31, 2016:
Description | Type | Expiration Date | Number of Contracts | Notional Value | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index E-Mini March Futures | Long | 3/17/17 | 744 | $ | 83,186,640 | $ | 173,556 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note March Futures | Long | 3/22/17 | 225 | 27,963,281 | (169,252 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 4,304 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investments in non-affiliates, at cost | $ | 5,857 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | 2,039,308,927 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at cost | $ | 2,039,314,784 | |||
|
| ||||
Investments in non-affiliates, at value | $ | 5,857 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at value | 2,132,789,081 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at value | $ | 2,132,794,938 | |||
Segregated cash for collateral | 111,073,150 | ||||
Interest and dividends receivable | 3,445 | ||||
Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | 504 | ||||
Receivable for capital shares issued | 1,128,129 | ||||
Receivable for affiliated investments sold | 1,055,130 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 12,862 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 2,246,068,158 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Cash overdraft | 2,143,972 | ||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 211,497 | ||||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | 217 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 189,404 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 5,829 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 2,104 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 6,240 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 4,739 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 131,369 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 2,695,371 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 2,243,372,787 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 2,054,942,233 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | 28,019,266 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | 66,926,830 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | 93,484,458 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 2,243,372,787 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 159,301,510 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 14.08 | |||
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | |||||
Dividends from affiliates | $ | 26,652,730 | |||
Dividends | 25,767 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Income | 26,678,497 | ||||
|
| ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Manager fees | 1,597,546 | ||||
Administration fees | 60,368 | ||||
Custodian fees | 3,116 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 26,662 | ||||
Trustee fees | 88,497 | ||||
Professional fees | 79,772 | ||||
Shareholder reports | 51,411 | ||||
Other expenses | 14,361 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total expenses | 1,921,733 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 24,756,764 | ||||
|
| ||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions from affiliates | (4,886,324 | ) | |||
Net realized gains distributions from affiliated underlying funds | 92,372,988 | ||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts | (16,651,571 | ) | |||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 24,123,149 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 94,958,242 | ||||
|
| ||||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 119,715,006 | |||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||
Change in Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 24,756,764 | $ | 27,850,585 | ||||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | 70,835,093 | 13,418,517 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 24,123,149 | (58,218,218 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 119,715,006 | (16,949,116 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||
From net investment income | (31,942,925 | ) | (11,042,254 | ) | ||||||
From net realized gains | (8,888,678 | ) | (11,515,211 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | (40,831,603 | ) | (22,557,465 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 151,231,938 | 307,517,730 | ||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued in merger | 642,975,499 | — | ||||||||
Proceeds from dividends reinvested | 40,831,603 | 22,557,465 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (63,010,102 | ) | (16,365,383 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | 772,028,938 | 313,709,812 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | 850,912,341 | 274,203,231 | ||||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 1,392,460,446 | 1,118,257,215 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 2,243,372,787 | $ | 1,392,460,446 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | 28,019,266 | $ | 31,942,865 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 11,127,802 | 21,813,939 | ||||||||
Shares issued in merger | 47,001,133 | — | ||||||||
Dividends reinvested | 3,000,118 | 1,683,393 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (4,601,086 | ) | (1,188,071 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | 56,527,967 | 22,309,261 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund
Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
Year Ended December 31, 2016 | Year Ended December 31, 2015 | Year Ended December 31, 2014 | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | January 10, 2012 December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 13.55 | $ | 13.90 | $ | 13.23 | $ | 10.95 | $ | 10.00 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Investment Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.14 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.09 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 0.77 | (0.36 | ) | 0.75 | 2.18 | 1.01 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 0.91 | (0.11 | ) | 0.85 | 2.28 | 1.10 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders From: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | (0.30 | ) | (0.12 | ) | (0.10 | ) | — | (0.12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains | (0.08 | ) | (0.12 | ) | (0.08 | ) | — | (b) | (0.03 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Dividends | (0.38 | ) | (0.24 | ) | (0.18 | ) | — | (b) | (0.15 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 14.08 | $ | 13.55 | $ | 13.90 | $ | 13.23 | $ | 10.95 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Return(c) | 6.80 | % | (0.80 | )% | 6.47 | % | 20.85 | % | 10.98 | %(d) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 2,243,373 | $ | 1,392,460 | $ | 1,118,257 | $ | 768,606 | $ | 261,143 | |||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss)(e) | 1.55 | % | 2.17 | % | 1.05 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.47 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Before Reductions*(e)(f) | 0.12 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.22 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions*(e) | 0.12 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.12 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.15 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 4 | %(g) | 1 | % | 1 | % | — | (h) | 11 | %(d) |
* | The expense ratios exclude the impact of fees/expenses paid by each underlying fund. |
(a) | Period from commencement of operations. During the period from January 10, 2012 to December 2012, the Fund’s primary vehicle for gaining exposure to derivatives was through investments in its wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary, the AZL MVP GIS Investments Trust (the “Subsidiary”). The Subsidiary was liquidated on December 10, 2012 at its net asset value on such date. The Subsidiary’s operations have been consolidated with the operations of the Fund through its liquidation on December 10, 2012. |
(b) | Represents less than $0.005. |
(c) | The returns include reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but exclude insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(d) | Not annualized. |
(e) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(f) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
(g) | Cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio securities incurred to realign the Fund’s portfolio after the fund merger are excluded from the portfolio turnover rate. If such amounts had not been excluded, the portfolio turnover rate would have been 4%. |
(h) | Represents less than 0.5%. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
7
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services - Investment Companies. The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, reclassification of certain market discounts, gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust.
Derivative Instruments
All open derivative positions at period end are reflected on the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The following is a description of the derivative instruments utilized by the Fund, including the primary underlying risk exposures related to each instrument type. The Fund’s allocation to the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process may include (a) derivatives such as index futures, other futures contracts, options, and other similar securities and (b) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large redemptions and any margin calls. Due to the leverage provided by derivatives, the notional value of the Fund’s derivative positions could exceed 20% of the Fund’s value. The Fund may also use futures to gain equity exposure and may hold cash as a buffer in the event of market shocks.
8
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Futures Contracts
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund invested in futures contracts to reduce volatility and limit the need to decrease or increase allocations to underlying funds. Futures contracts are valued based upon their quoted daily settlement prices. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to segregate liquid assets in accordance with the initial margin requirements of the broker or exchange. Futures contracts are marked to market daily and a payable or receivable for the change in value (“variation margin”) is recorded by the Fund. Gains or losses are recognized but not considered realized until the contracts expire or are closed. Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock futures, interest rate risk related to bond futures, and foreign currency risk related to currency futures) and exposure to loss in excess of the variation margin disclosed in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between the change in fair value of the underlying securities and the prices of futures contracts, the possibility of an illiquid market, and the inability of the counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The notional amount of futures contracts outstanding was $111.1 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average notional amount for these contracts was $101.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Realized gains and losses are reported as “Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts” on the Statement of Operations.
Summary of Derivative Instruments
The following is a summary of the fair values of derivative instruments on the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, categorized by risk exposure, as of December 31, 2016:
Asset Derivative | Liability Derivative | |||||||||||
Primary Risk Exposure | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | ||||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | 173,556 | Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | — | ||||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | — | 169,252 |
* | For futures contracts, the amounts represent the cumulative appreciation/depreciation of these futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Portfolio Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as variation margin on futures contracts. |
The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations, categorized by risk exposure, for the year ended December 31, 2016:
Primary Risk Exposure | Location of Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized in Income | Realized Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized | Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized | |||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Net Realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts/Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | $ | (16,429,017 | ) | $ | 130,524 | ||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | (222,554 | ) | (91,573 | ) |
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018. Expenses incurred for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.”
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund | 0.10 | % | 0.20 | % |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.” At December 31, 2016, there were no remaining contractual reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years.
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the period can be found on the Statement of Operations. During year ended December 31, 2016, there were no voluntary waivers.
9
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | $ | 331,777,725 | $ | 134,825,700 | $ | (13,244,925 | ) | $ | 518,310,753 | $ | 6,850,143 | ||||||||||||||
AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 264,425,252 | 79,414,487 | (9,405,182 | ) | 412,415,467 | 7,474,715 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 152,345,889 | 95,929,782 | (10,982,520 | ) | 254,988,987 | 1,713,464 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL S&P 500 Index Fund, Class 2 | 497,220,720 | 266,757,910 | (8,149,202 | ) | 814,319,154 | 9,699,393 | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund, Class 2 | 75,970,242 | 52,424,478 | (6,753,453 | ) | 132,754,720 | 915,015 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,321,739,828 | $ | 629,352,357 | $ | (48,535,282 | ) | $ | 2,132,789,081 | $ | 26,652,730 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair values services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $16,078 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments in other investment companies are valued at their published net asset value (“NAV”). Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board” or “Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). The investments utilizing Level 1 valuations represent investments in open-end investment companies. Futures contracts are valued at the last sales price as of the close of the primary exchange and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
10
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Company | $ | 2,132,789,081 | $ | — | $ | 2,132,789,081 | |||||||||
Unaffiliated Investment Company | 5,857 | 5,857 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | 2,132,794,938 | — | 2,132,794,938 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments:* | |||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | 4,304 | — | 4,304 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 2,132,799,242 | $ | — | $ | 2,132,799,242 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Other Financial Instruments would include any derivative instruments, such as futures contracts. These investments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the investment. |
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund | $ | 629,352,357 | $ | 63,053,806 |
6. Investment Risks
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest directly or through affiliated or unaffiliated mutual funds or unregistered investment pools in derivative instruments such as futures, options, and options on futures. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The other party to a derivatives contract could default.
7. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
Cost of securities for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $2,044,292,039. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 121,930,839 | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (33,427,940 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | 88,502,899 | ||
|
|
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund | $ | 31,942,925 | $ | 8,888,678 | $ | 40,831,603 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund | $ | 13,168,359 | $ | 9,389,106 | $ | 22,557,465 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
11
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund | $ | 28,019,267 | $ | 71,908,388 | $ | — | $ | 88,502,899 | $ | 188,430,554 |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
8. Acquisition of Funds
Effective as of the close of business October 21, 2016, the Fund acquired all of the net assets of the AZL MVP Fusion Growth Fund (“Acquired Fund”), an open-end management investment company, pursuant to a plan of reorganization approved by the Board on June 14, 2016. The purpose of the transaction was to combine two funds managed by the Manager with comparable investment objectives and strategies. The acquisition was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of 47,001,133 shares of the Fund, valued at $642,975,499, for 53,513,953 shares of the Acquired Fund outstanding as of close of business October 21, 2016.
The investment portfolio and cash of the Acquired Fund were the principal assets acquired by the Fund. At the close of business October 21, 2016, the Acquired Fund had a fair value of $643,223,205 and identified cost of $640,882,959. For financial reporting purposes, assets received and shares issued by the Fund were recorded at fair value; however, the cost basis of the investments received from the Acquired Fund was carried forward to align ongoing reporting of the Fund’s realized and unrealized gains and losses with amounts distributable to shareholders for tax purposes. Immediately prior to the merger, the Fund’s net assets were $1,520,825,037. All fees and expenses incurred by the Acquired Fund and the Fund directly in connection with the plan of reorganization were borne equally by the Manager and the Acquired Fund, except that the expenses borne by the Acquired Fund did not exceed $178,000, as provided by the plan of reorganization.
Assuming the acquisition had been completed on January 1, 2016, the beginning of the annual reporting period of the Fund, the Fund’s pro forma results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016, are as follows:
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 36,498,973 | ||
Net realized/unrealized gains/(losses) | 87,686,374 | |||
|
| |||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | $ | 124,185,347 | ||
|
|
Because the combined investment portfolios have been managed as a single integrated portfolio since the acquisition was completed, it is not practicable to separate the amounts of revenue and earnings of the Acquired Fund that have been included in the Fund’s statement of operations since October 22, 2016.
In the calculation of the portfolio turnover as presented in the Financial Highlights, the Fund excluded the cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio securities that occurred in the effort to realign a combined fund’s portfolio after the merger. The amounts of excluded purchases and sales are as follows:
Cost of purchases | $ | 223,205,153 | ||
Proceeds from sales | — |
9. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies - Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN - also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
10. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
12
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with brokers and transfer agents of the underlying funds. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
13
Other Federal Income Tax Information (Unaudited)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, 37.58% of the total ordinary income dividends paid by the Fund qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net long-term capital gain distributions of $8,888,678.
14
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (‘‘Commission’’) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
16
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
17
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. | |||||
Interested Trustees(3)
| ||||||||||
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
18
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 54 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 48 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without charge, by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197.
19
The Allianz VIP Fund of Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. | ||
These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
AZL® MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund
(formerly AZL® MVP Invesco Equity and Income Fund)
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 5
Statement of Operations
Page 5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 6
Financial Highlights
Page 7
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 13
Other Federal Income Tax Information
Page 14
Other Information
Page 15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 16
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 18
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL® MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
(formerly AZL® MVP Invesco Equity and Income Fund)
Allianz Investment Management LLC serves as the Manager for the AZL® MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund.
What factors affected the Fund’s performance for the year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL® MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) returned 5.43%. That compared to a 11.96%, 2.65% and a 8.21% total return for its benchmarks, the S&P 500 Index1, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, and the Balanced Composite Index1, respectively.
Effective October 14, 2016, the Fund’s name was changed to the AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund and Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”) assumed direct responsibility for the day-to-day management of the Fund’s assets. At the same time, the Fund’s investment strategies changed such that the Fund became a fund of funds which invested primarily in the shares of other mutual funds managed by the manager (the “Index Strategy Underlying Funds”).
The Fund is designed to provide a diversified portfolio consisting of index funds in equity and fixed income asset classes,combined with the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process intended to adjust the risk of the portfolio based on quantitative indicators of market risk, such as the current level of fund and market volatility. The Fund also employs the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process, which is intended to adjust the risk of the portfolio based on quantitative indicators of market risk, such as the current level of fund and market volatility.
Overall, 2016 brought a favorable economic backdrop for stocks. Major equity categories posted gains during the period under review as U.S. economic growth remained steady and central banks in many major economies continued to pursue accommodative strategies. Even so, the path of equity returns was not linear as global markets declined sharply following Britain’s June vote to leave the European Union only to rebound days later. U.S. equities also posted strong gains following the U.S. presidential election. The S&P 500 Index gained 11.96% during the period while the MSCI EAFE Index2, burdened in part by the impact of a strengthening dollar, rose 1.00%.
Fixed-income markets were generally positive during the period under review. The Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate for the second time in a decade and indicated that more rate hikes are likely in 2017. Spreads between U.S. Treasuries and corporate bonds tightened during the year, as investors searched for higher yields. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index gained 2.65% during the period under review.
The Fund underperformed its reference benchmark for the 12-month period under review. Weak stock selection within materials was a large detractor from relative performance. In particular, low exposure to metal mining companies hurt relative performance when these stocks rallied on rising metal prices.*
The high-quality bonds and convertible bonds, including the Fund’s use of futures to gain exposure to U.S. Treasuries, in the fixed-income portion of the portfolio posted positive performance, but underperformed equities. As a result, these holdings detracted from the Fund’s performance relative to its composite benchmark.*
Strong stock selection and underweight allocations in consumer discretionary and health care stocks were large contributors to the Fund’s performance relative to its composite benchmark. Stock selection and an overweight allocation to energy stocks also enhanced relative performance, as did stock selection in consumer staples. The Fund made use of currency forward contracts for the purpose of hedging currency exposure to non-U.S.-based companies held in the portfolio. These currency forward contracts had a positive impact on the Fund’s performance during the period.*
Following the change which occurred on October 14, 2016 through December 31, 2016, the Fund had a total return of 2.35%, and performed in line with its composite benchmark (2.33% total return).
Allocations to small- and mid-cap U.S. equities supported relative returns as they collectively outperformed the larger stocks found in the S&P 500. The Fund’s relative performance was hurt by a strategic allocation to international equity as non-U.S. equity markets broadly lagged their domestic counterparts during the period.*
The MVP risk management process which includes the use of derivatives, futures in particular, worked as intended and largely maintained a neutral equity allocation for most of the year relative to its target. In early 2016, global growth concerns led to increased volatility and the MVP reduced the Fund’s equity exposure. Equity markets quickly recovered, however, and the MVP risk management process ultimately caused a drag on the Fund’s performance relative to its benchmark.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. |
2 | The Morgan Stanley Capital International, Europe, Australasia and Far East (“MSCI EAFE”) Index is a free float-adjusted market capitalization-weighted index that is designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets, excluding the U.S. & Canada. |
Investors cannot invest directly in an index. |
1
AZL® MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a combination of Index Strategy Underlying Funds that represent different classes in the Fund’s asset allocation.
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in underlying funds, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of those underlying funds. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by each of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests.
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
Small- to mid-capitalization companies typically have a higher risk of failure and historically have experienced a greater degree of volatility.
The performance of the Fund is expected to be lower than that of the Indices because of Fund fees and expenses. Securities in which the Fund will invest may involve substantial risk and may be subject to sudden severe price declines.
Bonds offer a relatively stable level of income, although bond prices will fluctuate, providing the potential for principal gain or loss.
Investing in derivatives instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risk associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional instruments.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark as well as the two component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016
Since | ||||||||||||
1 | 3 | Inception | ||||||||||
Year | Year | (1/10/12) | ||||||||||
AZL® MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund | 5.43 | % | 3.43 | % | 8.38 | % | ||||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 8.87 | % | 14.10 | % | ||||||
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 2.65 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.26 | % | ||||||
Balanced Composite Index | 8.21 | % | 6.58 | % | 9.37 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL® MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund | 0.71 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.15% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the other investment companies. Accordingly, Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.13%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”), the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the Balanced Composite Index (“Composite”). The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value-weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year. The Composite is a blended index comprised of (60%) S&P 500 and (40%) Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,060.60 | $ | 0.62 | 0.12 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,024.53 | $ | 0.61 | 0.12 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Domestic Equities | 42.7 | % | |||
Fixed Income | 37.1 | ||||
International Equities | 15.2 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 95.0 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | 5.0 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
3
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Affiliated Investment Companies (95.0%): | ||||||||
18,097,624 | AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | $ | 193,101,645 | |||||
5,617,310 | AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | 79,204,077 | ||||||
2,241,417 | AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | 48,078,403 | ||||||
10,603,610 | AZL S&P 500 Index Fund, Class 2 | 149,086,758 | ||||||
1,740,684 | AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund, Class 2 | 24,769,929 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Affiliated Investment Companies (Cost $482,038,254) | 494,240,812 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Investment Securities | 494,240,812 | |||||||
Net other assets (liabilities) — 5.0% | 25,871,365 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 520,112,177 | ||||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
(a) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
Futures Contracts
Cash of $26,013,922 has been segregated to cover margin requirements for the following open contracts as of December 31, 2016:
Description | Type | Expiration Date | Number of Contracts | Notional Value | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index E-Mini March Futures | Long | 3/17/17 | 139 | $ | 15,541,590 | $ | 32,100 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note March Futures | Long | 3/22/17 | 84 | 10,439,625 | (63,387 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (31,287 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | $ | 482,038,254 | |||
|
| ||||
Investments in affiliates, at value | $ | 494,240,812 | |||
Segregated cash for collateral | 26,013,922 | ||||
Interest and dividends receivable | 11 | ||||
Receivable for capital shares issued | 31,193 | ||||
Receivable for affiliated investments sold | 1,681,737 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 2,940 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 521,970,615 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Cash overdraft | 1,692,845 | ||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 93,775 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 44,349 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 4,832 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 1,095 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 1,478 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 1,122 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 18,942 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 1,858,438 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 520,112,177 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 486,624,517 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | 8,896,980 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | 12,419,409 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | 12,171,271 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 520,112,177 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 38,537,921 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 13.50 | |||
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | |||||
Dividends from affiliates | $ | 9,550,108 | |||
Dividends | 3,304 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Income | 9,553,412 | ||||
|
| ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Manager fees | 520,252 | ||||
Administration fees | 54,617 | ||||
Custodian fees | 1,874 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 7,776 | ||||
Trustee fees | 26,474 | ||||
Professional fees | 19,805 | ||||
Shareholder reports | 15,188 | ||||
Other expenses | 10,436 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total expenses | 656,422 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 8,896,990 | ||||
|
| ||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions from affiliates | 12,276,655 | ||||
Net realized gains distributions from affiliated underlying funds | 16,154,057 | ||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts | (15,992,619 | ) | |||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 6,603,332 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 19,041,425 | ||||
|
| ||||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 27,938,415 | |||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||
Change In Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 8,896,990 | $ | 10,019,001 | ||||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | 12,438,093 | 17,325,307 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 6,603,332 | (44,072,890 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 27,938,415 | (16,728,582 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||
From net investment income | (11,530,345 | ) | (2,550,798 | ) | ||||||
From net realized gains | (15,559,033 | ) | (12,524,529 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | (27,089,378 | ) | (15,075,327 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 26,814,181 | 83,138,412 | ||||||||
Proceeds from dividends reinvested | 27,089,378 | 15,075,327 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (55,484,626 | ) | (13,022,406 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | (1,581,067 | ) | 85,191,333 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | (732,030 | ) | 53,387,424 | |||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 520,844,207 | 467,456,783 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 520,112,177 | $ | 520,844,207 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | 8,896,980 | $ | 11,530,335 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 2,047,099 | 5,858,209 | ||||||||
Dividends reinvested | 2,071,053 | 1,120,010 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (4,178,626 | ) | (909,382 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | (60,474 | ) | 6,068,837 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund
Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
Year Ended December 31, | January 10, 2012 (a) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 13.49 | $ | 14.37 | $ | 13.34 | $ | 10.77 | $ | 10.00 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Investment Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 0.48 | (0.71 | ) | 1.06 | 2.50 | 0.79 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 0.71 | (0.46 | ) | 1.12 | 2.57 | 0.89 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders From: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | (0.30 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.05 | ) | — | (0.10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains | (0.40 | ) | (0.35 | ) | (0.04 | ) | — | (b) | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Dividends | (0.70 | ) | (0.42 | ) | (0.09 | ) | — | (b) | (0.12 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 13.50 | $ | 13.49 | $ | 14.37 | $ | 13.34 | $ | 10.77 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Return(c) | 5.43 | % | (3.21 | )% | 8.42 | % | 23.88 | % | 8.89 | %(d) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 520,112 | $ | 520,844 | $ | 467,457 | $ | 298,836 | $ | 79,526 | |||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss)(e) | 1.71 | % | 1.97 | % | 0.65 | % | 0.89 | % | 1.82 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Before Reductions*(e)(f) | 0.13 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.16 | % | 0.36 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions*(e) | 0.13 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.14 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.15 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate(g) | 108 | %(h) | 2 | % | 1 | % | — | 9 | %(d) |
* | The expense ratios exclude the impact of fees/expenses paid by each underlying fund. |
(a) | Period from commencement of operations. During the period from January 10, 2012 to December 10, 2012, the Fund’s primary vehicle for gaining exposure to derivatives is through investments in its wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary, the AZL MVP IEI Investments Trust (“the Subsidiary”). The Subsidiary was liquidated on December 10, 2012 at its net asset value on such date. The Subsidiary’s operations have been consolidated with the operations of the Fund through its liquidation on December 10, 2012. |
(b) | Represents less than $0.005. |
(c) | The returns include reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but exclude insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(d) | Not annualized. |
(e) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(f) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
(g) | The portfolio turnover rate can be volatile due to the amount and timing of purchases and sales of fund shares during the period. |
(h) | Effective October 14, 2016, the investment strategy of the Fund changed. Costs of purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio securities associated with the changes in investment strategy contributed to higher portfolio turnover rate for the period ended December 31, 2016 as compared to prior years. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
7
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services - Investment Companies. The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund (formerly, AZL MVP Invesco Equity and Income Fund) (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold and on foreign currency transactions are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, reclassification of certain market discounts, gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust.
Derivative Instruments
All open derivative positions at period end are reflected on the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The following is a description of the derivative instruments utilized by the Fund, including the primary underlying risk exposures related to each instrument type. The Fund’s allocation to the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process may include (a) derivatives such as index futures, other futures contracts, options, and other similar securities and (b) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large redemptions and any margin calls. Due to the leverage provided by derivatives, the notional value of the Fund’s derivative positions could exceed 20% of the Fund’s value. The Fund may also use futures to gain equity exposure and may hold cash as a buffer in the event of market shocks.
8
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Futures Contracts
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund invested in futures contracts to reduce volatility and limit the need to decrease or increase allocations to underlying funds. Futures contracts are valued based upon their quoted daily settlement prices. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to segregate liquid assets in accordance with the initial margin requirements of the broker or exchange. Futures contracts are marked to market daily and a payable or receivable for the change in value (“variation margin”) is recorded by the Fund. Gains or losses are recognized but not considered realized until the contracts expire or are closed. Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock futures, interest rate risk related to bond futures, and foreign currency risk related to currency futures) and exposure to loss in excess of the variation margin disclosed in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between the change in fair value of the underlying securities and the prices of futures contracts, the possibility of an illiquid market, and the inability of the counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The notional amount of futures contracts outstanding was $26 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average notional amount for these contracts was $53.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Realized gains and losses are reported as “Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts” on the Statement of Operations.
Summary of Derivative Instruments
The following is a summary of the fair values of derivative instruments on the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, categorized by risk exposure, as of December 31, 2016:
Asset Derivative | Liability Derivative | |||||||||||
Primary Risk Exposure | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | ||||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | 32,100 | Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | — | ||||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | — | 63,387 |
* | For futures contracts, the amounts represent the cumulative appreciation/depreciation of these futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Portfolio Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as variation margin on futures contracts. |
The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations, categorized by risk exposure, for the year ended December 31, 2016:
Primary Risk Exposure | Location of Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized in Income | Realized Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized | Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized | |||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Net Realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts/Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | $ | (16,027,459 | ) | $ | 199,565 | ||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | 34,840 | (15,951 | ) |
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018. Expenses incurred for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.”
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund | 0.10 | % | 0.15 | % |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.” At December 31, 2016, there were no remaining contractual reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years.
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the period can be found on the Statement of Operations. During year ended December 31, 2016, there were no voluntary waivers.
9
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL Invesco Equity and Income Fund | $ | 494,565,552 | $ | 33,812,695 | $ | (533,764,681 | ) | $ | — | $ | 9,550,108 | ||||||||||||||
AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | — | 200,835,800 | (3,424,953 | ) | 193,101,645 | ��� | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL International Index Fund, Class 2 | — | 78,846,312 | (146,188 | ) | 79,204,077 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Mid Cap Index Fund, Class 2 | — | 47,308,165 | (4,121,777 | ) | 48,078,403 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL S&P 500 Index Fund, Class 2 | — | 150,602,900 | (9,865,896 | ) | 149,086,758 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund, Class 2 | — | 23,654,149 | (2,757,638 | ) | 24,769,929 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | 494,565,552 | $ | 535,060,021 | $ | (554,081,133 | ) | $ | 494,240,812 | $ | 9,550,108 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair values services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $5,318 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments in other investment companies are valued at their published net asset value (“NAV”). Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board” or “Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). The investments utilizing Level 1 valuations represent investments in open-end investment companies. Futures contracts are valued at the last sales price as of the close of the primary exchange and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
10
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Company | $ | 494,240,812 | $ | — | $ | 494,240,812 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | 494,240,812 | — | 494,240,812 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments:* | |||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | (31,287 | ) | — | (31,287 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 494,209,525 | $ | — | $ | 494,209,525 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Other Financial Instruments would include any derivative instruments, such as futures contracts. These investments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the investment. |
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund | $ | 535,060,021 | $ | 554,081,133 |
6. Investment Risks
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest directly or through affiliated or unaffiliated mutual funds or unregistered investment pools in derivative instruments such as futures, options, and options on futures. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The other party to a derivatives contract could default.
7. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
Cost of securities for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $482,038,285. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 16,516,087 | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (4,313,560 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | 12,202,527 | ||
|
|
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund | $ | 11,530,345 | $ | 15,559,033 | $ | 27,089,378 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund | $ | 3,299,807 | $ | 11,775,520 | $ | 15,075,327 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
11
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund | $ | 8,896,981 | $ | 12,388,152 | $ | — | $ | 12,202,527 | $ | 33,487,660 |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
8. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies - Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN - also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
9. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
12
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund (formerly, AZL MVP Invesco Equity and Income Fund) (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with brokers and transfer agents of the underlying funds. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
13
Other Federal Income Tax Information (Unaudited)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, 38.65% of the total ordinary income dividends paid by the Fund qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net long-term capital gain distributions of $15,559,033.
14
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (‘‘Commission’’) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
16
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
17
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. | |||||
Interested Trustees(3)
| ||||||||||
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
18
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 54 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 48 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without charge, by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197.
19
The Allianz VIP Fund of Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. | ||
These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
AZL® MVP Pyramis® Multi-Strategy Fund
(formerly AZL® MVP Franklin Templeton Founding Strategy Plus Fund)
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 5
Statement of Operations
Page 5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 6
Financial Highlights
Page 7
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 13
Other Federal Income Tax Information
Page 14
Other Information
Page 15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 16
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 18
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL® MVP Pyramis® Multi-Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
(formerly AZL® MVP Franklin Templeton Founding Strategy Plus Fund)
Allianz Investment Management LLC serves as the Manager for the AZL® MVP Pyramis® Multi-Strategy Fund.
What factors affected the Fund’s performance for year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL® MVP Pyramis® Multi-Strategy Fund (the “Fund”) returned 0.82%. That compared to a 11.96%, 2.65% and a 6.35% total return for its benchmarks, the S&P 500 Index1, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, and the Balanced Composite Index1, respectively.
The Fund currently invests in one underlying fund, the AZL® Pyramis® Multi-Strategy Fund. Approximately 60% of the underlying fund’s assets are managed by its subadviser, FIAM LLC, investing primarily in investment-grade fixed-income securities, and approximately 40% of the underlying fund’s assets will be managed by its subadviser, Geode Capital Management, LLC, investing in primarily in large-cap common stocks.
The global economy grew moderately during the 12-month period, despite slower growth in some countries. Domestic equities tumbled early in the period amid investor concerns over a slowing Chinese economy and falling commodity prices. Stocks rebounded as China’s central bank announced stimulus measures and the U.S. Federal Reserve adopted a cautious tone on interest rates. The U.K.’s Brexit roiled stock markets in June, but equities recovered quickly. Stocks also dipped before the U.S. presidential election but rallied after the election of Donald Trump. Most major bond sectors rose during the period.
Bonds performed well in the first half of the period, due in large part to a decline in interest rates, an improvement in commodity prices, an accommodative monetary policy and mostly stable U.S. economic conditions. The second half of the year proved more challenging for bonds as interest rates moved higher and inflation expectations rose.
The Fund’s returns were helped by exposure in its underlying funds to fixed income assets, particularly among high-yield corporate bonds and exposure to corporate credits in the energy and communications sectors. The Fund also benefited from investments by its underlying funds in a California-based information technology company, a New Jersey-based global pharmaceutical company and a U.K.-based global tobacco company. Stock selection by an underlying fund in the materials and industrials sectors, as well as stock selection in the energy sector, also benefited relative results. However, individual fixed income securities of several oil and gas companies detracted from Fund results during this period. The Fund was also hurt by stock selection in the health care and financials sectors.*
The Fund’s underlying fund used derivatives during the period, including FX forward contracts to manage foreign currency exposures, and interest rate swaps to hedge against duration and yield curve risks. The fund benefited from many currency positions during the period, including those held through FX forwards. However, select currency positions dragged on relative results, such as underweighted positions in the Japanese yen, the euro and the Australian dollar.*
The Fund’s relative performance benefited from exposure to Treasury inflation-protected securities, as well from an underweight position in mortgage-backed securities. The Fund also benefited from stock selection in the health care sector and the financials sector, particularly among large banks. The choice of stocks in the energy sector dragged on relative results. The Fund employed S&P 500 Index futures, which had no material impact on performance.*
The MVP risk management process, which includes the use of derivatives, worked as intended during the period under review and largely maintained a neutral equity allocation for most of the year relative to its target. There were two periods of volatility in 2016 during which the MVP process reduced the Fund’s equity exposure. Global growth concerns led to increased volatility at the start of the year, and volatility returned in mid-2016 as markets grappled with the U.K.’s vote to exit the European Union. In both instances, markets quickly recovered, and the MVP risk management process ultimately dragged on relative performance.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. |
1
AZL® MVP Pyramis® Multi-Strategy Fund Review (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek a high level of current income while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing primarily in shares of another mutual fund managed by the manager, the AZL® Pyramis® Multi-Strategy Fund, combined with the MVP risk management process.
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in an underlying fund, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of that underlying fund. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by of the underlying fund in which the Fund invests.
Emerging market investing may be subject to additional economic, political, liquidity, and currency risks not associated with more developed countries.
Mortgage-backed investments involve risk of loss due to prepayments and, like any bond, due to default. Because of the sensitivity of mortgage-related securities to changes in interest rates, the Fund’s performance may be more volatile than if it did not hold these securities.
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
Bonds offer a relatively stable level of income, although bond prices will fluctuate, providing the potential for principal gain or loss.
Debt securities held by the Fund may decline in value due to rising interest rates. Interest rates in the U.S. are at, or near, historic lows, which may increase the Fund’s exposure to risks related to rising rates.
Investing in derivatives instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risk associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional instruments.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s prospectus.
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmark as well as the two component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016
Since | ||||||||||||
1 | 3 | Inception | ||||||||||
Year | Year | (4/30/12) | ||||||||||
AZL® MVP Pyramis® Multi-Strategy Fund | 0.82 | % | -1.09 | % | 4.31 | % | ||||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 8.87 | % | 13.03 | % | ||||||
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 2.65 | % | 3.03 | % | 2.09 | % | ||||||
Balanced Composite Index | 6.35 | % | 5.41 | % | 6.47 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL® MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | 0.83 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.15% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the other investment companies. Accordingly, Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.15%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”), the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the Balanced Composite Index (“Composite”). The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value-weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year. The Composite is a blended index comprised of (40%) S&P 500 and (60%) Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,024.50 | $ | 0.66 | 0.13 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,024.48 | $ | 0.66 | 0.13 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Balanced | 95.1 | % | |||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 95.1 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | 4.9 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
3
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Affiliated Investment Company (95.1%): | ||||||||
21,961,877 | AZL Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 272,986,136 | |||||
|
| |||||||
Total Affiliated Investment Company (Cost $282,917,627) | 272,986,136 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Investment Securities (Cost $282,917,627)(a) — 95.1% | 272,986,136 | |||||||
Net other assets (liabilities) — 4.9% | 14,169,536 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 287,155,672 | ||||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
(a) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
Futures Contracts
Cash of $14,393,395 has been segregated to cover margin requirements for the following open contracts as of December 31, 2016:
Description | Type | Expiration Date | Number of Contracts | Notional Value | Unrealized Appreciation/ (Depreciation) | |||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index E-Mini March Futures | Long | 3/17/17 | 51 | $ | 5,702,310 | $ | 11,309 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note March Futures | Long | 3/22/17 | 69 | 8,575,406 | (51,978 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (40,669 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | $ | 282,917,627 | |||
|
| ||||
Investments in affiliates, at value | $ | 272,986,136 | |||
Segregated cash for collateral | 14,393,395 | ||||
Interest and dividends receivable | 4 | ||||
Receivable for affiliated investments sold | 44,944 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 1,541 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 287,426,020 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Cash overdraft | 44,908 | ||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 173,339 | ||||
Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | 9,519 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 24,422 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 4,685 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 1,076 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 810 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 615 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 10,974 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 270,348 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 287,155,672 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 310,825,876 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | 3,716,470 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | (17,414,514 | ) | |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | (9,972,160 | ) | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 287,155,672 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 26,602,341 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 10.79 | |||
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | |||||
Dividends from affiliates | $ | 4,109,665 | |||
Dividends | 1,661 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Income | 4,111,326 | ||||
|
| ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Manager fees | 297,017 | ||||
Administration fees | 52,729 | ||||
Custodian fees | 1,678 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 4,168 | ||||
Trustee fees | 14,058 | ||||
Professional fees | 10,340 | ||||
Shareholder reports | 8,603 | ||||
Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the manager | 51 | ||||
Other expenses | 6,192 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total expenses | 394,836 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 3,716,490 | ||||
|
| ||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions from affiliates | (6,544,419 | ) | |||
Net realized gains distributions from affiliated underlying funds | 5,087,086 | ||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts | (15,311,651 | ) | |||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 15,404,491 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | (1,364,493 | ) | |||
|
| ||||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 2,351,997 | |||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 | For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 | |||||||||
Change In Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 3,716,490 | $ | 11,849,982 | ||||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | (16,768,984 | ) | 4,302,154 | |||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 15,404,491 | (36,121,291 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 2,351,997 | (19,969,155 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||
From net investment income | (11,849,955 | ) | (4,497,810 | ) | ||||||
From net realized gains | (4,637,599 | ) | (5,307,311 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | (16,487,554 | ) | (9,805,121 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 11,951,865 | 44,569,516 | ||||||||
Proceeds from dividends reinvested | 16,487,554 | 9,805,121 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (34,816,037 | ) | (14,123,192 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | (6,376,618 | ) | 40,251,445 | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | (20,512,175 | ) | 10,477,169 | |||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 307,667,847 | 297,190,678 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 287,155,672 | $ | 307,667,847 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | 3,716,470 | $ | 11,849,948 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 1,091,028 | 3,651,994 | ||||||||
Dividends reinvested | 1,551,040 | 857,841 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (3,194,431 | ) | (1,143,789 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | (552,363 | ) | 3,366,046 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund
Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
Year Ended December 31, | April 27, 2012 to December 31, 2012 (a) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 11.33 | $ | 12.49 | $ | 12.39 | $ | 10.52 | $ | 10.00 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Investment Activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.15 | 0.43 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | (0.07 | ) | (1.20 | ) | 0.17 | 1.75 | 0.56 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 0.08 | (0.77 | ) | 0.29 | 1.87 | 0.69 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders From: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | (0.45 | ) | (0.18 | ) | (0.11 | ) | — | (0.13 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains | (0.17 | ) | (0.21 | ) | (0.08 | ) | — | (b) | (0.04 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Dividends | (0.62 | ) | (0.39 | ) | (0.19 | ) | — | (b) | (0.17 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 10.79 | $ | 11.33 | $ | 12.49 | $ | 12.39 | $ | 10.52 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
Total Return(c) | 0.82 | % | (6.21 | )% | 2.33 | % | 17.79 | % | 6.87 | %(d) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 287,156 | $ | 307,668 | $ | 297,191 | $ | 204,518 | $ | 44,647 | |||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss)(e) | 1.25 | % | 3.85 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.75 | % | 3.46 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Before Reductions*(e)(f) | 0.13 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.17 | % | 0.48 | % | |||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions*(e) | 0.13 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.15 | % | 0.15 | % | |||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate | 4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | 9 | % | 34 | %(d) |
* | The expense ratios exclude the impact of fees/expenses paid by each underlying fund. |
(a) | Period from commencement of operations. During the period from April 30, 2012 to December 2012, the Fund’s primary vehicle for gaining exposure to derivatives is through investments in its wholly-owned and controlled subsidiary, the AZL MVP FTFSP Investments Trust (“the Subsidiary”). The Subsidiary was liquidated on December 10, 2012 at its net asset value on such date. The Subsidiary’s operations have been consolidated with the operations of the Fund through its liquidation on December 10, 2012. |
(b) | Represents less than $0.005. |
(c) | The returns include reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but exclude insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(d) | Not annualized. |
(e) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(f) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
7
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services - Investment Companies. The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund (formerly, AZL MVP Franklin Templeton Founding Strategy Plus Fund) (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold and on foreign currency transactions are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, reclassification of certain market discounts, gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust.
Derivative Instruments
All open derivative positions at period end are reflected on the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The following is a description of the derivative instruments utilized by the Fund, including the primary underlying risk exposures related to each instrument type. The Fund’s allocation to the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process may include (a) derivatives such as index futures, other futures contracts, options, and other similar securities and (b) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large redemptions and any margin calls. Due to the leverage provided by derivatives, the notional value of the Fund’s derivative positions could exceed 20% of the Fund’s value. The Fund may also use futures to gain equity exposure and may hold cash as a buffer in the event of market shocks.
8
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Futures Contracts
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund invested in futures contracts to reduce volatility and limit the need to decrease or increase allocations to underlying funds. Futures contracts are valued based upon their quoted daily settlement prices. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to segregate liquid assets in accordance with the initial margin requirements of the broker or exchange. Futures contracts are marked to market daily and a payable or receivable for the change in value (“variation margin”) is recorded by the Fund. Gains or losses are recognized but not considered realized until the contracts expire or are closed. Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock futures, interest rate risk related to bond futures, and foreign currency risk related to currency futures) and exposure to loss in excess of the variation margin disclosed in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between the change in fair value of the underlying securities and the prices of futures contracts, the possibility of an illiquid market, and the inability of the counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The notional amount of futures contracts outstanding was $14.3 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average notional amount for these contracts was $37.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Realized gains and losses are reported as “Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts” on the Statement of Operations.
Summary of Derivative Instruments
The following is a summary of the fair values of derivative instruments on the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, categorized by risk exposure, as of December 31, 2016:
Asset Derivative | Liability Derivative | |||||||||||
Primary Risk Exposure | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | ||||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | 11,309 | Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | — | ||||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | — | 51,978 |
* | For futures contracts, the amounts represent the cumulative appreciation/depreciation of these futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Portfolio Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as variation margin on futures contracts. |
The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations, categorized by risk exposure, for the year ended December 31, 2016:
Primary Risk Exposure | Location of Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized in Income | Realized Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized | Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized | |||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Net Realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts/Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | $ | (15,205,503 | ) | $ | 2,248 | ||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | (106,148 | ) | (23,495 | ) |
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018. Expenses incurred for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.”
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | 0.10 | % | 0.15 | % |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.” At December 31, 2016, there were no remaining contractual reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years.
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the period can be found on the Statement of Operations. During year ended December 31, 2016, there were no voluntary waivers.
9
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 292,302,682 | $ | 10,542,515 | $ | (38,740,380 | ) | $ | 272,986,136 | $ | 4,109,665 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | 292,302,682 | $ | 10,542,515 | $ | (38,740,380 | ) | $ | 272,986,136 | $ | 4,109,665 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair values services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $3,062 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments in other investment companies are valued at their published net asset value (“NAV”). Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board” or “Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). The investments utilizing Level 1 valuations represent investments in open-end investment companies. Futures contracts are valued at the last sales price as of the close of the primary exchange and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
10
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Company | $ | 272,986,136 | $ | — | $ | 272,986,136 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | 272,986,136 | — | 272,986,136 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments:* | |||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | (40,669 | ) | — | (40,669 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 272,945,467 | $ | — | $ | 272,945,467 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Other Financial Instruments would include any derivative instruments, such as futures contracts. These investments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the investment. |
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 10,542,515 | $ | 38,740,380 |
6. Investment Risks
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest directly or through affiliated or unaffiliated mutual funds or unregistered investment pools in derivative instruments such as futures, options, and options on futures. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The other party to a derivatives contract could default.
7. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
Cost of securities for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $285,125,788. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | — | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (12,139,652 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | (12,139,652 | ) | |
|
|
As of the end of its tax year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund has capital loss carry forwards (“CLCFs”) as summarized in the table below. CLCFs subject to expiration are applied as short-term capital loss regardless of whether the originating capital loss was short-term or long-term. CLCFs that are not subject to expiration must be utilized before those that are subject to expiration. The Board does not intend to authorize a distribution of any realized gain for the Fund until any applicable CLCF has been offset or expires.
CLCFs not subject to expiration:
Short Term Amount | Long Term Amount | Total Amount | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 6,129,994 | $ | 9,117,028 | $ | 15,247,022 |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 11,849,968 | $ | 4,637,586 | $ | 16,487,554 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
11
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 5,014,758 | $ | 4,790,363 | $ | 9,805,121 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund | $ | 3,716,470 | $ | — | $ | (15,247,022 | ) | $ | (12,139,652 | ) | $ | (23,670,204 | ) |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
8. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies - Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN - also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
9. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
12
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund (formerly, AZL MVP Franklin Templeton Founding Strategy Plus Fund) (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with brokers and transfer agents of the underlying funds. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL MVP Pyramis Multi-Strategy Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the five-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
13
Other Federal Income Tax Information (Unaudited)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, 19.89% of the total ordinary income dividends paid by the Fund qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net long-term capital gain distributions of $4,637,586.
14
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (‘‘Commission’’) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
16
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
17
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. | |||||
Interested Trustees(3)
| ||||||||||
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
18
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 54 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 48 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without charge, by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197.
19
The Allianz VIP Fund of Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. | ||
These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
AZL® MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund
(formerly AZL® MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund)
Annual Report
December 31, 2016
Table of Contents
Management Discussion and Analysis
Page 1
Expense Examples and Portfolio Composition
Page 3
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
Page 4
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
Page 5
Statement of Operations
Page 5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
Page 6
Financial Highlights
Page 7
Notes to the Financial Statements
Page 8
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page 13
Other Federal Income Tax Information
Page 14
Other Information
Page 15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement
Page 16
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers
Page 18
This report is submitted for the general information of the shareholder of the Fund. The report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus, which contains details concerning the sales charges and other pertinent information.
AZL® MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund (unaudited)
(formerly AZL® MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund)
Allianz Investment Management LLC serves as the Manager for the AZL® MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund.
What factors affected the Fund’s performance during the year ended December 31, 2016?
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the AZL® MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund (the “Fund”) returned 7.62%. That compared to a 11.96%, 2.65% and a 8.21% total return for its benchmarks, the S&P 500 Index1, the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index1, and the Balanced Composite Index1, respectively.
The Fund is a fund of funds that invests primarily in a combination of three underlying mutual funds (the “Underlying Funds”), which are managed by the Manager. The Fund is designed to provide a diversified portfolio consisting of Underlying Funds in equity and fixed income asset classes, combined with the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process intended to adjust the risk of the portfolio based on quantitative indicators of market risk, such as the current level of fund and market volatility.*
The 12 months ended December 31, 2016 included strong returns for equities and several political surprises that impacted financial markets. The S&P 500 Index had a poor start to the year, driven by fears of a global economic slowdown, especially in China, and a collapse in oil prices. Stocks recovered in February and rose through late June as investor outlook improved. A brief but intense sell-off followed the U.K.’s unexpected vote in favor of leaving the European Union on June 23, but stocks quickly resumed their upward trajectory on expectations that global central banks would provide additional monetary policy.
After trading mostly flat in the weeks leading up to the November 8 U.S. election, stocks rallied strongly on a surprise presidential victory by Donald Trump. Investors drove share prices higher in anticipation of a more accommodating regulatory environment and fiscal stimulus such as tax cuts and increased infrastructure spending. Most sectors gained ground during the annual period, with energy, telecommunication services and financials leading. Health care and consumer staples were the main laggards.
The equity portion of the Fund strongly outperformed through the first three quarters of the year, driven by holdings in high quality names with durable growth and defensive characteristics. Weak performance in the final quarter, driven by the surprise election results, offset most of those gains. The postelection rally drove investors out of defensive areas of the market and into cyclical and lower-quality areas. The Fund maintained a cautious position in its portfolio holdings given relatively high valuations and a persistent uncertainty regarding the new administration’s policies. We maintained an overweight exposure to health care companies and added to the Fund’s position in consumer staples throughout the year under review.*
Stock selection decisions in the health care and consumer discretionary sectors contributed positively to the Fund’s performance relative to its equity benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. Stock selection in the information technology sector and an overweight position to consumer staples detracted from relative performance, however.*
The Fund’s above-benchmark exposure to high-yield securities within its fixed income holdings added to performance relative to its fixed income benchmark. The portfolio’s short duration securities also helped relative results later in the year as interest rates moved higher.*
The Fund maintained significant exposure to covered call options—this derivative provided downside protection for the portfolio while offering the benefits of owning a stock as long as the stock remains below the option strike price. These benefits included dividends and capital appreciation. The Fund held equity options throughout the period while equity rights were held periodically. Both options and rights were held at the end of the annual period.*
The MVP risk management process, which involves the use of derivatives, worked as intended and largely maintained a neutral equity allocation for most of the year relative to its target. In early 2016, concerns about global growth led to increased volatility, and the MVP reduced the Fund’s equity exposure. Equity markets quickly recovered, however, and the MVP risk management process dragged on relative performance.*
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
* | The Fund’s portfolio composition is subject to change. There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will continue to perform well or that securities in such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future. The information contained in this commentary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell securities in the sector mentioned. The Fund’s holdings and weightings are as of December 31, 2016. |
1 | For a complete description of the Fund’s performance benchmarks please refer to page 2 of this report. |
1
AZL® MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund (unaudited)
Fund Objective
The Fund’s investment objective is to seek long-term capital appreciation with preservation of capital as an important intermediate-term objective. This objective may be changed by the Trustees of the Fund without shareholder approval. The Fund seeks to achieve its objective by investing in a combination of Index Strategy Underlying Funds that represent different classes in the Fund’s asset allocation.
Investment Concerns
The Fund invests in underlying funds, so its investment performance is directly related to the performance of those underlying funds. Before investing, investors should assess the risks associated with and types of investments made by each of the underlying funds in which the Fund invests.
Emerging market investing may be subject to additional economic, political, liquidity, and currency risks not associated with more developed countries.
International investing may involve risk of capital loss from unfavorable fluctuations in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations.
The performance of the Fund is expected to be lower than that of the Indices because of Fund fees and expenses. Securities in which the Fund will invest may involve substantial risk and may be subject to sudden severe price declines.
Value-based investments are subject to the risk that the broad market may not recognize their intrinsic value.
Small- to mid-capitalization companies typically have a higher risk of failure and historically have experienced a greater degree of volatility.
Investing in a single industry or sector, or concentrating investments in a limited number of industries or sectors, tends to increase the risk that economic, political, or regulatory developments affecting certain industries or sectors will have a large impact on the value of the portfolio.
High-yield bonds have a higher risk of default or other adverse credit events, but have the potential to pay higher earnings over investment-grade bonds. The higher risk of default, or the inability of the creditor to repay its debt, is the primary reason for the higher interest rates on high-yield bonds.
Debt securities held by the Fund may decline in value due to rising interest rates. Interest rates in the U.S. are at, or near, historic lows, which may increase the Fund’s exposure to risks related to rising rates.
Investing in derivatives instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risk associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional instruments.
For a complete description of these and other risks associated with investing in a mutual Fund, please refer to the Fund’s
Growth of $10,000 Investment
The chart above represents a comparison of a hypothetical investment in the Fund versus a similar investment in the Fund’s benchmarks as well as the component indices of the Fund’s benchmark, and represents the reinvestment of dividends and capital gains in the Fund.
Average Annual Total Returns as of December 31, 2016
Since | ||||||||
1 | Inception | |||||||
Year | (1/10/14) | |||||||
AZL® MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund | 7.62 | % | 7.69 | % | ||||
S&P 500 Index | 11.96 | % | 9.06 | % | ||||
Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index | 2.65 | % | 2.81 | % | ||||
Balanced Composite Index | 8.21 | % | 6.60 | % |
Past performance does not guarantee future results. The performance data quoted represents past performance and current returns may be lower or higher. The investment return and principal value will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when redeemed may be worth more or less than the original cost. To obtain performance information current to the most recent month end, please visit www.Allianzlife.com.
Expense Ratio | Gross | |||
AZL® MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund | 0.91 | % |
The above expense ratio is based on the current Fund prospectus dated April 25, 2016, as supplemented October 14, 2016. The Manager and the Fund have entered into a written contract limiting operating expenses, excluding certain expenses (such as interest expense and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses), to 0.15% through April 30, 2018. Additional information pertaining to the December 31, 2016 expense ratios can be found in the financial highlights.
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are incurred indirectly by the Fund through the valuation of the Fund’s investments in the other investment companies. Accordingly, Acquired Fees and Expenses affect the Fund’s total returns. Because these fees and expenses are not included in the Fund’s financial highlights, the Fund’s total annual fund operating expenses do not correlate to the ratios of expenses to average net assets shown in the financial highlights table. Without Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses the Fund’s gross ratio would be 0.13%.
The total return of the Fund does not reflect the effect of any insurance charges, the annual maintenance fee or the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund distributions or the redemption of Fund shares. Such charges, fees and tax payments would reduce the performance quoted.
The Fund’s performance is measured against the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index (“S&P 500”), the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the Balanced Composite Index (“Composite”). The S&P 500 is representative of 500 selected common stocks, most of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a measure of the U.S. Stock market as a whole. The Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index is a market value-weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed-rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset-backed, and mortgage-backed securities, with maturities of at least one year. The Composite is a blended index comprised of (60%) of the S&P 500 and (40%) of the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. These indices are unmanaged and do not reflect the deduction of fees associated with a mutual fund, such as investment management and fund accounting fees. The Fund’s performance reflects the deduction of fees for services provided to the Fund. Investors cannot invest directly in an index.
2
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund
Expense Examples
(Unaudited)
As a shareholder of the AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund (the “Fund”), you incur ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution fees, and other Fund expenses. These examples are intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. Please note that the expenses shown in each table do not reflect expenses that apply to the subaccount or the insurance contract. If the expenses that apply to the subaccount of the insurance contract were included, your costs would have been higher.
These examples are based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the periods presented below.
The Actual Expense table below provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information below, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the table under the heading entitled “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Beginning Account Value 7/1/16 | Ending Account Value 12/31/16 | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,029.80 | $ | 0.61 | 0.12 | % |
The Hypothetical Expense table below provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on the Fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund’s actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of other funds.
Beginning Account Value | Ending Account Value | Expenses Paid During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16* | Annualized Expense Ratio During Period 7/1/16 - 12/31/16 | |||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund | $ | 1,000.00 | $ | 1,024.53 | $ | 0.61 | 0.12 | % |
* | Expenses are equal to the average account value over the period, multiplied by the Fund’s annualized expense ratio, multiplied by 184/366 (to reflect the one half year period). |
Portfolio Composition
(Unaudited)
Investments | Percent of Net Assets | ||||
Domestic Equities | 77.0 | % | |||
Fixed Income | 18.0 | ||||
Money Market | 0.1 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Securities | 95.1 | ||||
Net other assets (liabilities) | 4.9 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | 100.0 | % | |||
|
|
3
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund
Schedule of Portfolio Investments
December 31, 2016
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Affiliated Investment Companies (95.0%): | ||||||||
15,145,165 | AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | $ | 161,598,910 | |||||
17,434,629 | AZL S&P 500 Index Fund, Class 2 | 245,130,882 | ||||||
27,179,714 | AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | 447,921,695 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Affiliated Investment Companies (Cost $831,020,962) | 854,651,487 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Unaffiliated Investment Company (0.1%): | ||||||||
934,933 | Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management Fund, Institutional Shares, 0.31%(a) | 934,933 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Unaffiliated Investment Company (Cost $934,933) | 934,933 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Total Investment Securities (Cost $831,955,895)(b) — 95.1% | 855,586,420 | |||||||
Net other assets (liabilities) — 4.9% | 44,129,584 | |||||||
|
| |||||||
Net Assets — 100.0% | $ | 899,716,004 | ||||||
|
|
Percentages indicated are based on net assets as of December 31, 2016.
(a) | The rate represents the effective yield at December 31, 2016. |
(b) | See Federal Tax Information listed in the Notes to the Financial Statements. |
Futures Contracts
Cash of $45,038,093 has been segregated to cover margin requirements for the following open contracts as of December 31, 2016:
Description | Type | Expiration Date | Number of Contracts | Notional Value | Unrealized Appreciation/ | |||||||||||||||
S&P 500 Index E-Mini March Futures | Long | 3/17/17 | 240 | $ | 26,834,400 | $ | 52,628 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury 10-Year Note March Futures | Long | 3/22/17 | 145 | 18,020,781 | (106,808 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | (54,180 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
4
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
December 31, 2016
Assets: | |||||
Investments in non-affiliates, at cost | $ | 934,933 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at cost | 831,020,962 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at cost | $ | 831,955,895 | |||
|
| ||||
Investments in non-affiliates, at value | $ | 934,933 | |||
Investments in affiliates, at value | 854,651,487 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment securities, at value | $ | 855,586,420 | |||
Cash | 3,886 | ||||
Segregated cash for collateral | 45,038,093 | ||||
Interest and dividends receivable | 221 | ||||
Receivable for capital shares issued | 96,894 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 4,643 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Assets | 900,730,157 | ||||
|
| ||||
Liabilities: | |||||
Payable for affiliated investments purchased | 778,728 | ||||
Payable for capital shares redeemed | 120,905 | ||||
Manager fees payable | 75,628 | ||||
Administration fees payable | 5,064 | ||||
Custodian fees payable | 1,070 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees payable | 2,558 | ||||
Trustee fees payable | 1,943 | ||||
Other accrued liabilities | 28,257 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Liabilities | 1,014,153 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 899,716,004 | |||
|
| ||||
Net Assets Consist of: | |||||
Capital | $ | 845,900,984 | |||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | 12,492,263 | ||||
Accumulated net realized gains/(losses) from investment transactions | 17,746,412 | ||||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | 23,576,345 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Assets | $ | 899,716,004 | |||
|
| ||||
Shares of beneficial interest (unlimited number of shares authorized, no par value) | 78,434,420 | ||||
Net Asset Value (offering and redemption price per share) | $ | 11.47 | |||
|
|
Statement of Operations
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
Investment Income: | |||||
Dividends from affiliates | $ | 5,730,427 | |||
Dividends | 11,896 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total Investment Income | 5,742,323 | ||||
|
| ||||
Expenses: | |||||
Manager fees | 785,607 | ||||
Administration fees | 56,828 | ||||
Custodian fees | 1,968 | ||||
Administrative and compliance services fees | 12,743 | ||||
Trustee fees | 43,475 | ||||
Professional fees | 34,942 | ||||
Shareholder reports | 20,554 | ||||
Other expenses | 15,372 | ||||
|
| ||||
Total expenses | 971,489 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 4,770,834 | ||||
|
| ||||
Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments: | |||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on securities transactions from affiliates | (6,270,993 | ) | |||
Net realized gains distributions from affiliated underlying funds | 31,696,004 | ||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts | 132,178 | ||||
Change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 28,194,103 | ||||
|
| ||||
Net Realized/Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 53,751,292 | ||||
|
| ||||
Change in Net Assets Resulting From Operations | $ | 58,522,126 | |||
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
5
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund | ||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, | For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||
Change In Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Operations: | ||||||||||
Net investment income/(loss) | $ | 4,770,834 | $ | 2,428,351 | ||||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investment transactions | 25,557,189 | 14,694,243 | ||||||||
Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 28,194,103 | (2,256,692 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from operations | 58,522,126 | 14,865,902 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Distributions to Shareholders: | ||||||||||
From net investment income | (12,329,148 | ) | — | |||||||
From net realized gains | (4,719,453 | ) | (201,795 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from distributions to shareholders | (17,048,601 | ) | (201,795 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Capital Transactions: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from shares issued | 194,423,422 | 370,902,066 | ||||||||
Proceeds from dividends reinvested | 17,048,601 | 201,795 | ||||||||
Value of shares redeemed | (17,628,201 | ) | (10,212,396 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets resulting from capital transactions | 193,843,822 | 360,891,465 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in net assets | 235,317,347 | 375,555,572 | ||||||||
Net Assets: | ||||||||||
Beginning of period | 664,398,657 | 288,843,085 | ||||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
End of period | $ | 899,716,004 | $ | 664,398,657 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Accumulated net investment income/(loss) | $ | 12,492,263 | $ | 12,329,140 | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Share Transactions: | ||||||||||
Shares issued | 17,453,257 | 34,364,341 | ||||||||
Dividends reinvested | 1,516,780 | 19,001 | ||||||||
Shares redeemed | (1,590,113 | ) | (957,157 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
| |||||||
Change in shares | 17,379,924 | 33,426,185 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
6
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund
Financial Highlights
(Selected data for a share of beneficial interest outstanding throughout the periods indicated)
| Year Ended December 31, | January 10, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (a) | ||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period | $ | 10.88 | $ | 10.45 | $ | 10.00 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Investment Activities: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss) | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.01 | |||||||||||||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments | 0.79 | 0.39 | 1.11 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total from Investment Activities | 0.82 | 0.43 | 1.12 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Dividends to Shareholders From: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income | (0.17 | ) | — | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net Realized Gains | (0.06 | ) | — | (b) | (0.66 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total Dividends | (0.23 | ) | — | (b) | (0.67 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Net Asset Value, End of Period | $ | 11.47 | $ | 10.88 | $ | 10.45 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||
Total Return(c) | 7.62 | % | 4.15 | % | 11.19 | %(d) | ||||||||||||||
Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) | $ | 899,716 | $ | 664,399 | $ | 288,843 | ||||||||||||||
Net Investment Income/(Loss)(e) | 0.61 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||||||
Expenses Before Reductions*(e)(f) | 0.12 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||||||
Expenses Net of Reductions*(e) | 0.12 | % | 0.13 | % | 0.14 | % | ||||||||||||||
Portfolio Turnover Rate(g) | 52 | % | 1 | % | 1 | %(d) |
* | The expense ratios exclude the impact of fees/expenses paid by each underlying fund. |
(a) | Period from commencement of operations. |
(b) | Represents less than $0.005. |
(c) | The returns include reinvested dividends and fund level expenses, but exclude insurance contract charges. If these charges were included, the returns would have been lower. |
(d) | Not annualized. |
(e) | Annualized for periods less than one year. |
(f) | Excludes fee reductions. If such fee reductions had not occurred, the ratios would have been as indicated. |
(g) | The portfolio turnover rate can be volatile due to the amount and timing of purchases and sales of fund shares during the period. |
See accompanying notes to the financial statements.
7
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
1. Organization
The Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust (the “Trust”) was organized as a Delaware statutory trust on June 16, 2004. The Trust is a diversified open-end management investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (the “1940 Act”) and thus is determined to be an investment company, and follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946 “Financial Services - Investment Companies. The Trust consists of 12 separate investment portfolios (collectively, the “Funds”), of which one is included in this report, the AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund (formerly, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund) (the “Fund”), and 11 are presented in separate reports.
The Fund is a “fund of funds,” which means that the Fund invests primarily in other mutual funds. Underlying Funds invest in stock, bonds, and other securities and reflect varying amounts of potential investment risk and reward. The Underlying Funds record their investments at fair value. Periodically, the Fund will adjust its asset allocation as it seeks to achieve its investment objective.
The Trust is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares of the Fund without par value. Shares of the Fund are available through the variable annuity contracts offered through the separate accounts of participating insurance companies. Currently, the Fund only offers its shares to separate accounts of Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York, affiliates of the Trust and the Manager, as defined below.
Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Fund may enter into contracts with its vendors and others that provide for general indemnifications. The Fund’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund. However, based on experience, the Fund expects that risk of loss to be remote.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets from operations during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Security Valuation
The Fund records its investments at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants at the measurement date. The valuation techniques used to determine fair value are further described in Note 4 below.
Investment Transactions and Investment Income
Investment transactions are recorded not later than on the business day following trade date. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are accounted for on trade date. Net realized gains and losses on investments sold and on foreign currency transactions are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis and includes, where applicable, the amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts.
Dividends to Shareholders
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The Fund distributes its dividends from net investment income and net realized capital gains, if any, on an annual basis. The amount of dividends from net investment income and from net realized gains is determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP. These “book/tax” differences are either temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these differences are permanent in nature (e.g., return of capital, net operating loss, reclassification of certain market discounts, gain/loss, paydowns, and distributions), such amounts are reclassified within the composition of net assets based on their federal tax-basis treatment; temporary differences (e.g., wash sales) do not require reclassification. Dividends to shareholders that exceed net investment income and net realized gains for tax purposes are reported as distributions of capital.
Expense Allocation
Expenses directly attributable to the Fund are charged directly to the Fund, while expenses attributable to more than one Fund are allocated among the respective Funds based upon relative net assets or some other reasonable method. Expenses which are attributable to more than one Trust are allocated across the Allianz Variable Insurance Products and Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trusts based upon relative net assets or another reasonable basis. Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”), serves as the investment manager for the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust.
Derivative Instruments
All open derivative positions at period end are reflected on the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. The following is a description of the derivative instruments utilized by the Fund, including the primary underlying risk exposures related to each instrument type. The Fund’s allocation to the MVP (Managed Volatility Portfolio) risk management process may include (a) derivatives such as index futures, other futures contracts, options, and other similar securities and (b) cash, money market equivalents, short-term debt instruments, money market funds, and short-term debt funds to satisfy all applicable margin requirements and to provide additional portfolio liquidity to satisfy large redemptions and any margin calls. Due to the leverage provided by derivatives, the notional value of the Fund’s derivative positions could exceed 20% of the Fund’s value. The Fund may also use futures to gain equity exposure and may hold cash as a buffer in the event of market shocks.
8
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
Futures Contracts
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund invested in futures contracts to reduce volatility and limit the need to decrease or increase allocations to underlying funds. Futures contracts are valued based upon their quoted daily settlement prices. Upon entering into a futures contract, the Fund is required to segregate liquid assets in accordance with the initial margin requirements of the broker or exchange. Futures contracts are marked to market daily and a payable or receivable for the change in value (“variation margin”) is recorded by the Fund. Gains or losses are recognized but not considered realized until the contracts expire or are closed. Futures contracts involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (generally equity price risk related to stock futures, interest rate risk related to bond futures, and foreign currency risk related to currency futures) and exposure to loss in excess of the variation margin disclosed in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The primary risks associated with the use of futures contracts are the imperfect correlation between the change in fair value of the underlying securities and the prices of futures contracts, the possibility of an illiquid market, and the inability of the counterparty to meet the terms of the contract. The notional amount of futures contracts outstanding was $44.9 million as of December 31, 2016. The monthly average notional amount for these contracts was $40.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. Realized gains and losses are reported as “Net realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts” on the Statement of Operations.
Summary of Derivative Instruments
The following is a summary of the fair values of derivative instruments on the Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities, categorized by risk exposure, as of December 31, 2016:
Asset Derivative | Liability Derivative | |||||||||||
Primary Risk Exposure | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | Statement of Assets and Liabilities Location | Total Fair Value* | ||||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Receivable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | 52,628 | Payable for variation margin on futures contracts | $ | — | ||||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | — | 106,808 |
* | For futures contracts, the amounts represent the cumulative appreciation/depreciation of these futures contracts as reported in the Schedule of Portfolio Investments. Only current day’s variation margin is reported within the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as variation margin on futures contracts. |
The following is a summary of the effect of derivative instruments on the Statement of Operations, categorized by risk exposure, for the year ended December 31, 2016:
Primary Risk Exposure | Location of Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized in Income | Realized Gains/(Losses) on Derivatives Recognized | Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation on Derivatives Recognized | |||||||
Equity Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Equity Contracts | Net Realized gains/(losses) on futures contracts/Change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | $ | 216,349 | $ | 33,710 | |||||
Interest Rate Risk Exposure | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts | (84,171 | ) | (48,505 | ) |
3. Fees and Transactions with Affiliates and Other Parties
The Manager provides investment advisory and management services for the Fund. The Manager has contractually agreed to waive fees and reimburse the Fund to limit the annual expenses, excluding interest expense (e.g., cash overdraft fees), taxes, brokerage commissions, acquired fund fees and expenses, other expenditures that are capitalized in accordance with U.S. GAAP and other extraordinary expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of the Fund’s business, based on the daily net assets of the Fund, through April 30, 2018. Expenses incurred for investment advisory and management services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Manager fees.”
For the year ended December 31, 2016, the annual rate due to the Manager and the annual expense limit were as follows:
Annual Rate | Annual Expense Limit | |||||||||
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund | 0.10 | % | 0.15 | % |
Any amounts contractually waived or reimbursed by the Manager in a particular fiscal year will be subject to repayment by the Fund to the Manager to the extent that from time to time through the next three fiscal years the repayment will not cause the Fund’s expenses to exceed the lesser of the stated limit at the time of the waiver or the current stated limit. Any amounts recouped by the Manager during the year are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Recoupment of prior expenses reimbursed by the Manager.” At December 31, 2016, there were no remaining contractual reimbursements that are subject to repayment by the Fund in subsequent years.
In addition, the Manager may voluntarily waive or reimburse additional fees in order to maintain more competitive expense ratios. Any voluntary waivers or reimbursements are not subject to repayment in subsequent years. Information on the total amount waived/reimbursed by the Manager or repaid to the Manager by the Fund during the period can be found on the Statement of Operations. During year ended December 31, 2016, there were no voluntary waivers.
9
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The Manager or an affiliate of the Manager serves as the investment adviser of certain underlying funds in which the Fund invests and is paid a separate fee from the underlying funds for such services. At December 31, 2016, these underlying funds are noted as Affiliated Investment Companies in the Fund’s Schedule of Portfolio Investments. A summary of the Fund’s investments in affiliated investment companies for the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
Fair Value 12/31/15 | Purchases at Cost | Proceeds from Sales | Fair Value 12/31/16 | Dividend Income | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | $ | 630,242,972 | $ | 187,336,118 | $ | (381,990,178 | ) | $ | 447,921,695 | $ | 5,730,427 | ||||||||||||||
AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund | — | 166,558,732 | (1,550,205 | ) | 161,598,910 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
AZL S&P 500 Index Fund, Class 2 | — | 233,297,240 | (1,181,096 | ) | 245,130,882 | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
$ | 630,242,972 | $ | 587,192,090 | $ | (384,721,479 | ) | $ | 854,651,487 | $ | 5,730,427 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to separate agreements between the Funds and the Manager, the Manager provides a Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) and certain compliance oversight and regulatory filing services to the Trust. Under these agreements the Manager is entitled to an amount equal to a portion of the compensation and certain other expenses related to the individuals performing the CCO and compliance oversight services, as well as $100 per hour for time incurred in connection with the preparation and filing of certain documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or the “Commission”). The fees are paid to the Manager on a quarterly basis. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administrative and compliance services fees.”
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (“Citi” or the “Administrator”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup, Inc., with which an officer of the Trust is affiliated, serves as the Trust’s administrator and fund accountant, and assists the Trust in all aspects of its administration and operation. The Administrator is entitled to a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly. The Administrator is entitled to an annual fee for each additional class of shares of any Fund, certain annual fees in supporting fair values services, and a Trust-wide annual fee for providing infrastructure and support in implementing the written policies and procedures comprising the Fund’s compliance program. The Administrator is also reimbursed for certain expenses incurred. The total expenses incurred by the Fund for these services are reflected on the Statement of Operations as “Administration fees.”
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (“FIS”) (formerly, SunGard Investor Services LLC) serves as the Fund’s transfer agent. Under the Transfer Agent Agreement, the Trust pays FIS a fee for its services and reimburses FIS for all of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in providing these services.
The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon” or the “Custodian”) serves as the Trust’s custodian and securities lending agent. For these services as custodian, the Funds pay BNY Mellon a fee based on a percentage of assets held on behalf of the Funds, plus certain out-of-pocket charges.
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), an affiliate of the Manager, serves as distributor of the Fund and receives a Trust-wide annual fee of $7,500, paid by the Manager from its profits and not by the Trust, for recordkeeping and reporting services.
In addition, certain legal fees and expenses are paid to a law firm, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, of which the Secretary of the Fund is Senior Counsel. During the year ended December 31, 2016, $7,757 was paid from the Fund relating to these fees and expenses.
Certain Officers and Trustees of the Trust are affiliated with the Manager or the Administrator. Such Officers (except for the Trust’s CCO as noted above) and Trustees receive no compensation from the Trust for serving in their respective roles. For their service to the Trust and to the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust, each non-interested Trustee receives a $170,000 annual Board retainer; the Lead Director receives an additional $42,500 annually and the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an additional $25,500 annually. In addition, the Trustees are reimbursed for certain expenses associated with attending Board meetings. Compensation to the Trustees is allocated between the Trust and the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust in proportion to the assets under management of each trust. During the year ended December 31, 2016, actual Trustee compensation was $1,258,000 in total for both trusts.
4. Investment Valuation Summary
The valuation techniques employed by the Fund, as described below, maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in determining fair value. The inputs used for valuing the Fund’s investments are summarized in the three broad levels listed below:
● | Level 1 — quoted prices in active markets for identical assets |
● | Level 2 — other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayments speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
● | Level 3 — significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. The Fund determines transfers between fair value hierarchy levels at the reporting period end. The inputs or methodology used for valuing investments is not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those investments.
Investments in other investment companies are valued at their published net asset value (“NAV”). Security prices are generally provided by an independent third party pricing service approved by the Trust’s Board of Trustees (the “Board” or “Trustees”) as of the close of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) (generally 4:00 pm Eastern Time). The investments utilizing Level 1 valuations represent investments in open-end investment companies. Futures contracts are valued at the last sales price as of the close of the primary exchange and are typically categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, there were no Level 3 investments for which significant unobservable inputs were used to determine fair value.
10
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
The following is a summary of the valuation inputs used as of December 31, 2016 in valuing the Fund’s investments based upon the three levels defined above:
Investment Securities: | Level 1 | Level 2 | Total | ||||||||||||
Affiliated Investment Company | $ | 854,651,487 | $ | — | $ | 854,651,487 | |||||||||
Unaffiliated Investment Company | 934,933 | — | 934,933 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investment Securities | 855,586,420 | — | 855,586,420 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Other Financial Instruments:* | |||||||||||||||
Futures Contracts | (54,180 | ) | — | (54,180 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Total Investments | $ | 855,532,240 | $ | — | $ | 855,532,240 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Other Financial Instruments would include any derivative instruments, such as futures contracts. These investments are generally recorded in the financial statements at the unrealized gain or loss on the investment. |
5. Security Purchases and Sales
For the year ended December 31, 2016, cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of securities (excluding securities maturing less than one year from acquisition) were as follows:
Purchases | Sales | |||||||||
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund | $ | 587,192,090 | $ | 384,721,479 |
6. Investment Risks
Derivatives Risk: The Fund may invest directly or through affiliated or unaffiliated mutual funds or unregistered investment pools in derivative instruments such as futures, options, and options on futures. A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The other party to a derivatives contract could default.
7. Federal Tax Information
It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company by complying with the provisions available to certain investment companies, as defined under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, and to make distributions of net investment income and net realized gains sufficient to relieve it from all, or substantially all, federal income taxes. Accordingly, no provisions for federal income taxes are required in the financial statements.
Management of the Fund has reviewed tax positions taken in tax years that remain subject to examination by all major tax jurisdictions, including federal (i.e., the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then, as applicable). Management believes that there is no tax liability resulting from unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken.
Cost of securities for federal income tax purposes at December 31, 2016 is $832,692,005. The gross unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on a tax basis is as follows:
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 27,027,803 | ||
Unrealized (depreciation) | (4,133,388 | ) | ||
|
| |||
Net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) | $ | 22,894,415 | ||
|
|
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2016 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund | $ | 12,329,149 | $ | 4,719,452 | $ | 17,048,601 |
(a) | Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes. |
The tax character of dividends paid to shareholders during the year ended December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Ordinary Income | Net Long-Term Capital Gains | Total Distributions(a) | |||||||||||||
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund | $ | 79,958 | $ | 121,837 | $ | 201,795 |
(a) Total distributions paid may differ from the Statements of Changes in Net Assets because dividends are recognized when actually paid for tax purposes.
11
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund
Notes to the Financial Statements
December 31, 2016
At December 31, 2016, the components of accumulated earnings on a tax basis were as follows:
Undistributed Ordinary Income | Undistributed Long-Term Capital Gains | Accumulated Capital and Other Losses | Unrealized Appreciation/ Depreciation(a) | Total Accumulated Earnings/ (Deficit) | |||||||||||||||||||||
AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund | $ | 12,552,188 | $ | 18,368,417 | $ | — | $ | 22,894,415 | $ | 53,815,020 |
(a) | The difference between book-basis and tax-basis unrealized appreciation/depreciation is attributable primarily to tax deferral of losses on wash sales. |
8. Investment Company Reporting Modernization
In October 2016, the SEC released its Final Rules on Investment Company Reporting Modernization (the “Rules”). The Rules which introduce two new regulatory reporting forms for investment companies - Form N-PORT and Form N-CEN - also contain amendments to Regulation S-X which require standardized, enhanced disclosures about derivatives in investment company financial statements, as well as other amendments. The amendments are effective for filings made with the SEC after August 1, 2017. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the amendments on the fund’s financial statements. The adoption will have no effect on the Funds’ net assets or results of operations.
9. Subsequent Events
Management of the Fund has evaluated the need for additional disclosures or adjustments resulting from events through the date the financial statements were issued. Based on this evaluation, there were no subsequent events to report that would have material impact on the Fund’s financial statements.
12
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust:
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities of AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund (formerly, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund) (the “Fund”) of the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of December 31, 2016, and the related statement of operations for the year then ended, the statements of changes in net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the three-year period then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2016, by correspondence with the custodian, brokers, and transfer agents of the underlying funds. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund as of December 31, 2016, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the years in the two-year period then ended, and the financial highlights for each of the years or periods in the three-year period then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 24, 2017
13
Other Federal Income Tax Information (Unaudited)
For the year ended December 31, 2016, 19.53% of the total ordinary income dividends paid by the Fund qualify for the corporate dividends received deduction available to corporate shareholders.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Fund declared net long-term capital gain distributions of $4,719,452.
14
Other Information (Unaudited)
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available, without charge, upon request, by visiting the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (‘‘Commission’’) website at www.sec.gov, or by calling 800-624-0197.
Information regarding how the Fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30th is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-624-0197; (ii) on the Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust’s website at https://www.allianzlife.com; and (iii) on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files complete Schedules of Portfolio Holdings with the Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Schedules of Portfolio Holdings for the Fund in this report are available without charge on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov, or may be reviewed and copied at the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
15
Approval of Investment Advisory Agreement (Unaudited)
Subject to the general supervision of the Board of Trustees and in accordance with each Fund’s investment objectives and restrictions, investment advisory services are provided to the Funds by Allianz Investment Management LLC (the “Manager”). The Manager manages each Fund pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with the Trust in respect of each such Fund. The Management Agreement provides that the Manager, subject to the supervision and approval of the Board of Trustees, is responsible for the management of each Fund. For management services, each Fund pays the Manager an investment advisory fee based upon each Fund’s average daily net assets. The Manager has contractually agreed to limit the expenses of each Fund by reimbursing each Fund if and when total Fund operating expenses exceed certain amounts until at least May 1, 2018.
Wilshire Funds Management (“Wilshire”) serves as a consultant to the Manager in preparing statistical and other factual information for use in the creation and maintenance of the asset allocation models for the Fusion Funds (the AZL MVP Fusion Conservative, Balanced, and Moderate Funds), pursuant to an agreement between the Manager and Wilshire. Wilshire serves as a consultant to the Manager with respect to selecting the Fusion Permitted Underlying Investments and the Fund’s asset allocations among the Permitted Underlying Investments. The Manager, not any Fund, pays a consultant fee to Wilshire. Wilshire began serving in its capacity as a consultant beginning January 1, 2010.
In reviewing the services provided by the Manager and the terms of the Management Agreement, the Board receives and reviews information related to the Manager’s experience and expertise in the variable insurance marketplace. Currently, the Funds are offered only through variable annuities and variable life insurance policies, and not in the retail fund market. In addition, the Board receives information regarding the Manager’s expertise with regard to portfolio diversification and asset allocation requirements within variable insurance products issued by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America and its subsidiary, Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York. Currently, the Funds are offered only through Allianz Life and Allianz of New York variable products.
As required by the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”), the Trust’s Board has reviewed and approved the Management Agreement with the Manager. The Board’s decision to approve this contract reflects the exercise of its business judgment on whether to approve new arrangements and continue the existing arrangements. During its review of the contract, the Board considered many factors, among the most material of which are: the Funds’ investment objectives, the Manager’s management philosophy, personnel, processes and investment performance, including its compliance history and the adequacy of its compliance processes; the preferences and expectations of Fund shareholders (and underlying contract owners) and their relative sophistication; the continuing state of competition in the mutual fund industry; and comparable fees in the mutual fund industry.
The Board also considered the compensation and benefits received by the Manager. This includes fees received for services provided to a Fund by employees of the Manager or of affiliates of the Manager and research services received by the Manager from brokers that execute Fund trades, as well as advisory fees. The Board considered the fact that: (1) the Manager and the Trust are parties to an Administrative Service Agreement and Compliance Services Agreement, under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for performing certain administrative and compliance services including providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer; and (2) Allianz Life Financial Services LLC, an affiliated person of the Manager, is a registered securities broker-dealer and receives (along with its affiliated persons) payments made by the Underlying Funds pursuant to Rule 12b-1.
The Board is aware that various courts have interpreted provisions of the 1940 Act and have indicated in their decisions that the following factors may be relevant to the Manager’s compensation: the nature and quality of the services provided by the Manager, including the performance of the funds; the Manager’s cost of providing the services; the extent to which the Manager may realize “economies of scale” as the funds grow larger; any indirect benefits that may accrue to the Manager and its affiliates as a result of the Manager’s relationship with the funds; performance and expenses of comparable funds; the profitability to the Manager from acting as adviser to the funds; and the extent which the independent Board members are fully informed about all facts bearing on the Manager’s services and fees. The Trust’s Board is aware of these factors and took them into account in its review of the Management Agreement for the Funds.
The Board considered and weighed these circumstances in light of its experience in governing the Trust, and is assisted in its deliberations by the advice of legal counsel to the Independent Trustees. In this regard, the Board requests and receives a significant amount of information about the Funds and the Manager. Some of this information is provided at each regular meeting of the Board; additional information is provided in connection with the particular meeting or meetings at which the Board’s formal review of an advisory contract occurs. In between regularly scheduled meetings, the Board may receive information on particular matters as the need arises. Thus, the Board’s evaluation of the Management Agreement is informed by reports covering such matters as: the Manager’s investment philosophy, personnel and processes, and the Fund’s investment performance (in absolute terms as well as in relationship to its benchmark). In connection with comparing the performance of each Fund versus its benchmark, the Board receives reports on the extent to which the Fund’s performance may be attributed to various applicable factors, such as asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies, the performance of the Underlying Funds, rebalancing decisions, and the impact of cash positions and Fund fees and expenses. The Board also receives reports on the Funds’ expenses (including the advisory fee itself and the overall expense structure of the Funds, both in absolute terms and relative to similar and/or competing funds, with due regard for contractual or voluntary expense limitations); the nature and extent of the advisory and other services provided to the Fund by the Manager and its affiliates; compliance and audit reports concerning the Funds and the companies that service them; and relevant developments in the mutual fund industry and how the Funds and/or the Manager are responding to them.
The Board also receives financial information about the Manager, including reports on the compensation and benefits the Manager derives from its relationships with the Funds. These reports cover not only the fees under the Management Agreement, but also fees, if any, received for providing other services to the Funds. The reports also discuss any indirect or “fall out” benefits the Manager or its affiliates may derive from its relationship with the Funds.
The Management Agreement was most recently considered at Board of Trustees meetings held in the fall of 2016. Information relevant to the approval of such Agreement was considered at a telephonic Board of Trustees meeting on October 19, 2016, and at an “in person” Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016. The Agreement was approved at the Board meeting of October 25, 2016. At such meeting the Board also approved an Expense Limitation Agreement between the Manager and the Trust for the period ending April 30, 2018. In connection with such meetings, the Trustees requested and evaluated extensive materials from the Manager, including performance and expense information for other investment companies with similar investment objectives derived from data compiled by an independent third party provider and other sources believed to be reliable by the Manager. Prior to voting, the Trustees reviewed the proposed approval/continuance of the Agreement with management and with experienced counsel who are independent of the Manager and received a memorandum from such counsel discussing the legal standards for their consideration of the proposed approvals/ continuances. The independent (“disinterested”) Trustees also discussed the proposed approvals/continuances in a private session with such counsel at which no representatives of the Manager were present. In reaching their determinations relating to the approval and/or continuance of the Agreement, in respect of each Fund, the Trustees considered all factors they believed relevant. The Board based its decision to approve the Management Agreement on the totality of the circumstances and relevant factors, and with a view to past and future long-term considerations. Not all of the factors and considerations discussed above and below are necessarily relevant to each Fund, and the Board did not assign relative weights to factors discussed herein or deem any one or group of them to be controlling in and of themselves.
16
An SEC rule requires that shareholder reports include a discussion of certain factors relating to the selection of the investment adviser and the approval of the advisory fee. The “factors” enumerated by the SEC are set forth below in italics, as well as the Board’s conclusions regarding such factors:
(1) The nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that the Manager, subject to the control of the Board of Trustees, administers each Fund’s business and other affairs. The Trustees noted that the Manager also provides the Trust and each Fund with such administrative and other services (exclusive of, and in addition to, any such services provided by any others retained by the Trust on behalf of the Funds) and executive and other personnel as are necessary for the operation of the Trust and the Funds. Except for the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer, the Manager pays all of the compensation of Trustees and officers of the Trust who are employees of the Manager or its affiliates.
The Trustees considered the scope and quality of services provided by the Manager and noted that the scope of such services provided had expanded as a result of recent regulatory and other developments. The Trustees noted that, for example, the Manager is responsible for maintaining and monitoring its own compliance program, and this compliance program has been continuously refined and enhanced in light of new regulatory requirements. The Trustees considered the capabilities and resources which the Manager has dedicated to performing services on behalf of the Trust and its Funds. The quality of administrative and other services, including the Manager’s role in coordinating the activities of the Trust’s other service providers, also was considered. The Trustees concluded that, overall, they were satisfied with the nature, extent and quality of services provided (and expected to be provided) to the Trust and to each of the Funds under the Management Agreement.
(2) The investment performance of the Fund and the Manager. In connection with the fall 2016 contract review process, Trustees received extensive information on the performance results of each of the Funds. This included, for example, performance information on absolute total return, performance versus the appropriate benchmark(s), the contribution to performance of the Manager’s asset class allocation decisions and volatility management strategies (the volatility management strategy was modified to incorporate a volatility cap in the second quarter of 2013), the performance of the Underlying Funds, and the impact on performance of rebalancing decisions, cash and Fund fees. This included Lipper performance information on all of the Funds for the previous quarter, and previous one, three and five year periods, to the extent the Funds were in existence for such periods. For example, in connection with the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Manager reported that for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, for the 10 Funds for which three year performance information was available, five Funds were in the top 40% and five Funds were in the bottom 40%. For the 12 Funds for which one year performance information was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, three Funds were in the top 40%, five Funds were in the middle 20%, and four Funds were in the bottom 40%. The Manager also reported that for the five Funds for which five year performance information was available, for the five year period ended June 30, 2016, three were in the top 40% and two were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016 the Manager reported upon the performance of the MVP Funds compared to custom managed volatility peer groups. For the eight Funds for which three year performance information was available, for the three year period ended June 30, 2016, five Funds were in the top 40%, one Fund was in the middle 20%, and two were in the bottom 40%. For the ten Funds for which one year performance was available, for the one year period ended June 30, 2016, four Funds were in the top 40%, three were in the middle 20%, and three were in the bottom 40%.
At the Board of Trustees meeting held October 25, 2016, the Trustees determined that the investment performance of the Funds was acceptable.
(3) The costs of services to be provided and profits to be realized by the Manager and its affiliates from the relationship with the Funds. The Board considered that the Manager receives an advisory fee from each of the Funds. The Manager reported that for the three MVP Fusion Funds the advisory fee paid put these Funds in the 41st percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for three Index Strategy Funds the advisory fee paid put them in the 33rd percentile of the customized peer group. The Manager reported that for the AZL MVP BlackRock Global Allocation, AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy, AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation, and for the AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Funds, the advisory paid fee was in the 10th percentile. Trustees were provided with information on the total expense ratios of the Funds and other funds in the customized peer groups, and the Manager reported upon the challenges in making peer group comparisons for the Funds.
The Manager provided information concerning the profitability of the Manager’s investment advisory activities for the period from 2013 through June 30, 2016. The Trustees recognized that it is difficult to make comparisons of profitability from investment company advisory agreements because comparative information is not generally publicly available and is affected by numerous factors, including the structure of the particular adviser, the types of funds it manages, its business mix, numerous assumptions regarding allocation of expenses and the adviser’s capital structure and cost of capital. In considering profitability information, the Trustees considered the possible effect of certain fall-out benefits to the Manager and its affiliates. The Trustees focused on profitability of the Manager’s relationships with the Funds before taxes and distribution expenses. The Trustees recognized that the Manager should, in the abstract, be entitled to earn a reasonable level of profits for the services it provides to each Fund.
Based upon the information provided, the Board concluded that the Funds’ advisory fees and expense ratios are not unreasonable, and determined that there was no evidence that the Manager’s level of profitability from its relationship with the Funds was excessive.
(4) and (5) The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Funds grow, and whether fee levels reflect these economies of scale. The Trustees noted that the advisory fee schedules for the Funds do not contain breakpoints that reduce the fee rate on assets above specified levels. The Trustees recognized that breakpoints may be an appropriate way for the Manager to share its economies of scale, if any, with Funds that have substantial assets. However, they also recognized that there may not be a direct relationship between any economies of scale realized by Funds and those realized by the Manager as assets increase. The Trustees do not believe there is a uniform methodology for establishing breakpoints that give effect to Fund-specific services provided by the Manager. The Trustees noted that in the fund industry as a whole, as well as among funds similar to the Funds, there is no uniformity or pattern in the fees and asset levels at which breakpoints (if any) apply. Depending on the age, size, and other characteristics of a particular fund and its manager’s cost structure, different conclusions can be drawn as to whether there are economies of scale to be realized at any particular level of assets, notwithstanding the intuitive conclusion that such economies exist, or will be realized at some level of total assets. Moreover, because different managers have different cost structures and service models, it is difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from the breakpoints that may have been adopted by other funds. The Trustees also noted that the advisory agreements for many funds do not have breakpoints at all, or if breakpoints exist, they may be at asset levels significantly greater than those of the individual Funds. The Trustees also noted that the total assets in all of the Funds as of June 30, 2016 were approximately $10.4 billion and that the largest Fund, the AZL MVP Fusion Moderate Fund, had assets of approximately $2.4 billion.
Having taken these factors into account, the Trustees concluded that the absence of breakpoints in the Funds’ advisory fee rate schedules was acceptable under each Fund’s circumstances.
The Trustees noted that the Manager has agreed to temporarily “cap” Fund expenses at certain levels, which has the effect of reducing expenses as would the implementation of advisory fee breakpoints. The Manager has committed to continue to consider the continuation of fee “caps” and/or advisory fee breakpoints as the Funds grow larger. The Board receives quarterly reports on the level of Fund assets. It expects to consider whether or not to approve the Management Agreement at a meeting to be held prior to December 31, 2017, and will at that time, or prior thereto, consider: (a) the extent to which economies of scale can be realized, and (b) whether the advisory fee should be modified to reflect such economies of scale, if any.
17
Information about the Board of Trustees and Officers (Unaudited)
The Trust is managed by the Trustees in accordance with the laws of the state of Delaware governing business trusts. There are currently eight Trustees, two of whom are an “interested persons” of the Trust within the meaning of that term under the 1940 Act. The Trustees and Officers of the Trust, their addresses, ages, their positions held with the Trust, their terms of office with the Trust and length of time served, their principal occupation(s) during the past five years, the number of portfolios in the Trust they oversee, and their other directorships held during the past five years are as follows:
Non-Interested Trustees(1)
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Peter R. Burnim, Age 69 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/07 | Consultant/Chair, various companies: Chairman, LDN Risk Management and subsidiaries, July 2015 to present; Chairman, Argus Investment Strategies Fund Ltd., February 2013 to present; Managing Director, iQ Venture Advisors, LLC. 2005 to present; Chairman, Northstar Group Holdings Ltd. Bermuda, 2011 to present; and Expert Witness, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, 2011 to present. | 35 | Argus Group Holdings and Subsidiaries; Northstar Group Holdings, NRIL, Sterling Centrecorp Inc.; Highland Financial Holdings; Bank of Bermuda NY; Sterling Trust (Cayman) Ltd.; and LDN Risk Management and Subsidiaries. | |||||
Peggy L. Ettestad, Age 59 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Lead Independent Trustee | Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) | Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present | 35 | Luther College | |||||
Roger A. Gelfenbien, Age 73 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Partner of Accenture 1983 to 1999 | 35 | Virtus Funds (8 Funds) | |||||
Claire R. Leonardi, Age 61 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Chief Executive Officer, Health eSense Inc., 2015 to Present; CEO, Connecticut Innovations, Inc., 2012 to 2015; General Partner, Fairview Capital, L.P., 1994 to 2012 | 35 | reSet Social Enterprise Investment Fund; Connecticut Technology Council; and Connecticut Bioscience Innovation Fund | |||||
Dickson W. Lewis, Age 68 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 2/04 | Retired; Vice President/General Manager, Yearbooks & Canada-Lifetouch National School Studios, 2006 to 2013; Vice President/General Manager of Jostens, Inc., 2002 to 2006; Senior Vice President of Fortis Group, 1997 to 2002 | 35 | None | |||||
Arthur C. Reeds III, Age 72 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 10/99 | Retired; Senior Investment Officer, Hartford Foundation for Public Giving, 2000 to 2003; Chairman, Chief Executive and President of Conning Corp., 1999 to 2000 | 35 | Connecticut Water Service, Inc. | |||||
Interested Trustees(3)
| ||||||||||
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | Number of Portfolios Overseen for Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Other During Past 5 Years | |||||
Robert DeChellis, Age 49* 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 3/08 | President and CEO, Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 2007 to present | 35 | None | |||||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Trustee | Since 6/11 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present | 35 | None |
* | Mr. DeChellis resigned from the Board of Trustees effective December 31, 2016, as a result of taking another position within Allianz. |
18
Officers
Name, Address, and Age | Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust | Term of Office(2)/Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years | |||
Brian Muench, Age 46 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | President | Since 11/10 | President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, November 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, April 2011 to present. | |||
Michael Radmer, Age 71 Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Suite 1500 50 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-1498 | Secretary | Since 02/02 | Senior Counsel (previously, Partner), Dorsey and Whitney LLP since 1976. | |||
Bashir C. Asad, Age 54 Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer | Since 06/16 | Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. | |||
Chris R. Pheiffer, Age 48 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 | Chief Compliance Officer(4) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer | Since 02/14 | Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust, February 2014 to present; Deputy Chief Compliance Officer of the VIP Trust and the FOF Trust and Compliance Director, Allianz Life, February 2007 to February 2014. |
(1) | Member of the Audit Committee. |
(2) | Indefinite. |
(3) | Is an “interested person”, as defined by the 1940 Act, due to employment by Allianz. |
(4) | The Manager and the Trust are parties to a Chief Compliance Officer Agreement under which the Manager is compensated by the Trust for providing an employee of the Manager or one of its affiliates to act as the Trust’s Chief Compliance Officer. The Chief Compliance Officer and Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer is not considered a corporate officer or executive employee of the Trust. |
The Fund’s Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) contains additional information about the Fund’s Trustees and Officers. The SAI is available upon request, without charge, by calling toll free 1-800-624-0197.
19
The Allianz VIP Funds are distributed by Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC. | ||
These Funds are not FDIC Insured. | ANNRPT1216 2/17 |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
(a) | The registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. This code of ethics is included as an Exhibit. |
(b) | During the period covered by the report, with respect to the registrant’s code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions; there have been no amendments to, nor any waivers granted from, a provision that relates to any element of the code of ethics definition enumerated in paragraph (b) of this Item 2. |
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
(a)(1) | The registrant’s board of directors has determined that the registrant has at least one audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee. |
(a)(2) | The audit committee financial expert is Arthur C. Reeds III, who is “independent” for purposes of this Item 3 of Form N-CSR. |
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
(a) Audit Fees | $ | 161,000 | $ | 163,000 | ||||
(b) Audit-Related Fees | $ | 10,000 | $ | 5,500 |
The 2016 fees relate to the consent on Form N-1A for the annual registration statement and review of the Form N-14 filed with the Securities Exchange Commission paid to KPMG LLP. The 2015 fees relate to the review of post-effective registration statements paid to KPMG LLP. |
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
(c) Tax Fees | $ | 46,900 | $ | 42,000 |
The 2016 fees relate to the preparation of the registrant’s federal income tax returns and review of the final tax calculation and tax opinions and preparation of Form 966 for merged funds. The 2015 fees relate to the preparation of the registrant’s tax returns and review of capital gain distribution calculations and preparation of excise tax returns. |
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
(d) All Other Fees | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
4(e)(1) | The Audit Committee (“Committee”) of the Registrant is responsible for pre-approving all audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditor in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence. Before the Registrant engages the independent auditor to render a service, the engagement must be either specifically approved by the Committee or entered into pursuant to the pre-approval policy. The Committee may delegate preapproval authority to one or more of its members. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report any pre-approval decisions to the Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Committee may not delegate to management the Committee’s responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditor. The Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its Chairman for any services not exceeding $10,000. |
4(e)(2) | During the previous two fiscal years, the Registrant did not receive any non-audit services pursuant to a waiver from the audit committee approval or pre-approval requirement under paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X. |
4(f) | Not applicable |
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
4(g) | $ | 56,900 | $ | 47,500 |
Aggregate non-audit fees billed by KPMG for services rendered to the Registrant and the investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser) and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the adviser that provided ongoing services to the registrant. |
4(h) | Not applicable |
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable. |
Item 6. Investments.
(a) | The Schedule of Investments as of the close of the reporting period are included as part of the report to shareholders filed under Item 1 of the Form N-CSR. |
(b) | Not applicable. |
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable. |
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable. |
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable. |
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable. |
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) | The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their evaluation of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as conducted within 90 days of the filing date of this report, that these disclosure controls and procedures are adequately designed and are operating effectively to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant on Form N-CSR is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. |
(b) | There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. |
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) | The code of ethics that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2 is attached hereto. |
(a)(2) | Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) are attached hereto. |
(a)(3) | Not applicable. |
(b) | Certifications pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) are furnished herewith. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant) | Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust |
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Brian Muench | |
Brian Muench, Principal Executive Officer |
Date | February 24, 2017 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Brian Muench | |
Brian Muench, Principal Executive Officer |
Date | February 24, 2017 |
By (Signature and Title) | /s/ Bashir C. Asad | |
Bashir C. Asad, Principal Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer |
Date | February 24, 2017 |