EXHIBIT 99. PROXYPOL
DIVIDEND CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, LLC
PROXY VOTING
Dividend Capital Investments, LLC (the “Adviser”) acts as a discretionary investment adviser for various clients, including clients governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) and registered open-end management investment companies (i.e., “mutual funds”). The Adviser is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) as an investment adviser pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). Some of the Adviser’s clients have delegated to the Adviser the authority to vote proxies or act with respect to corporate actions that may arise with respect to securities held within such client’s investment portfolio. Corporate actions may include, for example and without limitation, tender offers or exchanges, bankruptcy proceedings, and class actions. The Adviser’s authority to vote proxies or act with respect to other corporate actions is established through the delegation of discretionary authority under its investment advisory agreements. Therefore, unless a client (including a “named fiduciary” under ERISA) specifically reserves the right, in writing, to vote its own proxies or to take shareholder action with respect to other corporate actions requiring shareholder actions, the Adviser will vote all proxies and act on all other actions in a timely manner as part of its full discretionary authority over client assets in accordance with these policies and procedures.
When voting proxies or acting with respect to corporate actions on behalf of clients, the Adviser’s utmost concern is that all decisions be made solely in the best interests of the client (and for ERISA accounts, plan beneficiaries and participants, in accordance with the letter and spirit of ERISA). The Adviser will act in a prudent and diligent manner intended to enhance the economic value of the assets in the client’s account.
The purpose of these policies and procedures is to memorialize the procedures and policies adopted by the Adviser to enable it to comply with its fiduciary responsibilities to clients and the requirements of Rule 206(4)-6 under the Advisers Act. These policies and procedures also reflect the fiduciary standards and responsibilities set forth by the Department of Labor for ERISA accounts.
The Adviser is ultimately responsible for ensuring that all proxies received are voted in a timely manner and in a manner consistent with the Adviser’s determination of the client’s best interests. Although many proxy proposals may be voted in accordance with the Guidelines described in Section V below, some proposals require special consideration which may dictate that the Adviser makes an exception to the Guidelines.
The Adviser is also responsible for ensuring that all corporate action notices or requests which require shareholder action that are received are addressed in a timely manner and consistent action is taken across all similarly situated client accounts.
A. Conflicts of Interest
Where a proxy proposal raises a material conflict between the Adviser’s interests and a client’s interest, including a mutual fund client, the Adviser will resolve such a conflict in the manner described below:
| | 1. | Vote in Accordance with the Guidelines. To the extent that the Adviser has little or no discretion to deviate from the Guidelines with respect to the proposal in question, the Adviser shall vote in accordance with such pre-determined voting policy. |
| | 2. | Obtain Consent of Clients. To the extent that the Adviser has discretion to deviate from the Guidelines with respect to the proposal in question, the Adviser will disclose the conflict to the relevant clients and obtain their consent to the proposed vote prior to voting the securities. The disclosure to the client will include sufficient detail regarding the matter to be voted on and the nature of the conflict so that the client will be able to make an informed decision regarding the vote. If a client does not respond to such a conflict disclosure request or denies the request, the Adviser will abstain from voting the securities held by that client’s account. |
| | 3. | Client Directive to Use an Independent Third Party. Alternatively, a client may, in writing, specifically direct the Adviser to forward all proxy matters in which the Adviser has a conflict of interest regarding the client’s securities to an identified independent third party for review and recommendation. Where such independent third party’s recommendations are received on a timely basis, the Adviser will vote all such proxies in accordance with such third party’s recommendation. If the third party’s recommendations are not timely received, the Adviser will abstain from voting the securities held by that client’s account. |
The Adviser will review the proxy proposal for conflicts of interest as part of the overall vote review process. All material conflicts of interest so identified will be addressed as described above in this Section III, A.
B. Limitations
In certain circumstances, in accordance with a client’s investment advisory agreement (or other written directive) or where the Adviser has determined that it is in the client’s best interest, the Adviser will not vote proxies received. The following are certain circumstances where the Adviser will limit its role in voting proxies:
| | 1. | Client Maintains Proxy Voting Authority. Where a client specifies in writing that it will maintain the authority to vote proxies itself or that it has delegated the right to vote proxies to a third party, the Adviser will not vote the securities and will direct the relevant custodian to send the proxy material directly to the client. If any proxy material is received by the Adviser for such account, it will promptly be forwarded to the client or specified third party. |
| | 2. | Terminated Account. Once a client account has been terminated in accordance with its investment advisory agreement, the Adviser will not vote any proxies received after the termination date. However, the client may specify in writing that proxies should be directed to the client (or a specified third party) for action. |
| | 3. | Limited Value. If the Adviser determines that the value of a client’s economic interest or the value of the portfolio holding is indeterminable or insignificant, the Adviser may abstain from voting a client’s proxies. The Adviser also will not vote proxies received for securities which are no longer held by the client’s account. In addition, the Adviser generally will not vote securities where the economic value of the securities in the client account is less than $500. |
| | 4. | Securities Lending Programs. When securities are out on loan, they are transferred into the borrower’s name and are voted by the borrower, in its discretion. However, where the Adviser determines that a proxy vote (or other shareholder action) is materially important to the client’s account, the Adviser may recall the security for the purposes of voting. |
| | 5. | Unjustifiable Costs. In certain circumstances, after doing a cost-benefit analysis, the Adviser may abstain from voting where the cost of voting a client’s proxy would exceed any anticipated benefits from the proxy proposal. |
In accordance with Rule 204-2 under the Advisers Act, the Adviser will maintain for the time periods set forth in the Rule: (i) these proxy voting procedures and policies, and all amendments thereto; (ii) all proxy statements received regarding client securities (provided however, that the Adviser may rely on the proxy statement filed on EDGAR as its records); (iii) a record of all votes cast on behalf of clients; (iv) records of all written client requests for proxy voting information; (v) a copy of any written response made by the Adviser to any written or oral client request for proxy voting information; (vi) any documents prepared by the Adviser that were material to making a decision on how to vote or that memorialized the basis for the decision; and (vii) all records relating to requests made to clients regarding conflicts of interest in voting the proxy.
The Adviser will describe in its Form ADV, Part II (or other brochure fulfilling the requirement of Rule 204-3 under the Advisers Act) its proxy voting policies and procedures and will inform clients how they may obtain information on how the Adviser voted proxies with respect to the clients’ portfolio securities. The Adviser will also provide to each mutual fund client a copy of its policies and procedures. Clients may obtain information on how their securities were voted or a copy of the policies and procedures by written request addressed to the Adviser.
The Adviser will coordinate with all mutual fund clients to assist in the provision of all information required to be filed by such mutual funds on Form N-PX. Form N-PX will provide information concerning each matter relating to a portfolio security considered at any shareholder meeting with respect to which a mutual fund was entitled to vote. Each Form N-PX will need to be filed no later than August 31st of each year, and will cover all proxy votes with respect to which a mutual fund was entitled to vote for the period July 1st through June 30th. The Adviser shall maintain and provide the following information concerning any shareholder meetings with respect to which a mutual fund they manage was entitled to vote:
| | • | | the name of the issuer of the portfolio security; |
| | • | | the exchange ticker symbol of the portfolio security; |
| | • | | the CUSIP number of the portfolio security; |
| | • | | the shareholder meeting date; |
| | • | | a brief description of the matter voted on; |
| | • | | whether the matter was put forward by the issuer or a shareholder; |
| | • | | whether the mutual fund voted; |
| | • | | how the mutual fund cast its vote; and |
| | • | | whether the mutual fund cast its vote for or against management. |
Each proxy issue will be considered individually. The following guidelines are a partial list to be used in voting proposals contained in the proxy statements, but will not be used as rigid rules.
A. Oppose.
The Adviser will generally vote against any management proposal that clearly has the effect of restricting the ability of shareholders to realize the full potential value of their investment. Proposals in this category would include:
| | 1. | Issues regarding the issuer’s board entrenchment and anti-takeover measures such as the following: |
| | a. | Proposals to stagger board members’ terms; |
| | b. | Proposals to limit the ability of shareholders to call special meetings; |
| | c. | Proposals to require super majority votes; |
| | d. | Proposals requesting excessive increases in authorized common or preferred shares where management provides no explanation for the use or need of these additional shares; |
| | e. | Proposals regarding “fair price” provisions; |
| | f. | Proposals regarding “poison pill” provisions; and |
| | g. | Permitting “green mail”. |
| | 2. | Providing cumulative voting rights. |
B. Approve.
Routine proposals are those which do not change the structure, bylaws, or operations of the corporation to the detriment of the shareholders. Given the routine nature of these proposals, proxies will nearly always be voted with management. Traditionally, these issues include:
| | 1. | Election of independent accountants recommended by management, unless seeking to replace if there exists a dispute over policies. |
| | 2. | Date and place of annual meeting. |
| | 3. | Limitation on charitable contributions or fees paid to lawyers. |
| | 4. | Ratification of directors’ actions on routine matters since previous annual meeting. |
| | 5. | Confidential voting. Confidential voting is most often proposed by shareholders as a means of eliminating undue management pressure on shareholders regarding their vote on proxy issues. The Adviser will generally vote to approve these proposals as shareholders can later divulge their votes to management on a selective basis if a legitimate reason arises. |
| | 6. | Limiting directors’ liability. |
| | 7. | Eliminate preemptive rights. Preemptive rights give current shareholders the opportunity to maintain their current percentage ownership through any subsequent equity offerings. These provisions are no longer common in the U.S., and can restrict management’s ability to raise new capital. |
| | 8. | The Adviser will generally vote to approve the elimination of preemptive rights, but will oppose the elimination of listed preemptive rights, e.g., on proposed issues representing more than an acceptable level of total dilution. |
| | 9. | Employee Stock Purchase Plans. |
| | 10. | Establish 40 1(k) Plans. |
C. Case-By-Case.
The Adviser will review each issue in this category on a case-by-case basis. Voting decisions will he made based on the financial interest of the client involved. These matters include proposals to:
| | 1. | Pay directors solely in stock; |
| | 2. | Eliminate director’s mandatory retirement policy; |
| | 3. | Rotate annual meeting location or date; |
| | 4. | Changes in the state of incorporation; |
| | 5. | Social and corporate responsibility issues; |
| | 6. | Option and stock grants to management and directors; and |
| | 7. | Allowing indemnification of directors and/or officers after reviewing the applicable laws and extent of protection requested. |
D. Investment Company Issues.
From time to time the Adviser will have to vote shares of investment company securities that may be held in a client’s account. These matters generally include proposals to:
| | 1. | Elect directors or trustees; |
| | 2. | Ratify or approve independent accountants; |
| | 3. | Approve a new investment adviser or sub-adviser; |
| | 4. | Approve a change to an investment advisory fee; |
| | 5. | Approve a Distribution (i.e., Rule 12b-1) Plan; |
| | 6. | Approve a change in a fundamental investment objective, policy or limitation; |
| | 7. | Approve a change in the state of incorporation; and |
| | 8. | Approve a plan of reorganization or merger. |
The Adviser will generally vote with management’s recommendation on the election of directors and trustees, the approval of independent accountants, the approval of a change in a fundamental investment objective, policy or limitation, and the approval of a change in the state of incorporation. On the approval of a new investment adviser or sub-adviser, approval of a change in investment advisory fee, approval of a distribution (i.e., Rule 12b-1) plan, or the approval of a plan of reorganization or merger, the Adviser will review each issue on a case-by-case basis. Voting decisions will be made based on the financial interest of the client involved.
E. In some cases, the Adviser will delegate the authority and responsibility to vote proxies for the Funds’ securities to the Adviser. So long as proxy voting authority for the Funds has been delegated to the Adviser, the Subadviser is herby delegated the authority with respect to those securities that are specifically part of the Subadviser’s Managed Assets.
F. Proxy Voting has been delegated to Calamos Advisors LLC.
Amended and Restated: March 26, 2010
Page 1 of 7
PROXY VOTING
Calamos Advisors LLC
Calamos Partners LLC
Calamos Wealth Management LLC
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
Introduction
Calamos Advisors LLC, Calamos Partners LLC and Calamos Wealth Management LLC (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Calamos”), as an investment adviser to clients who have granted them proxy voting discretion (including, in the case of Calamos Advisors LLC the Calamos mutual funds and closedend funds (the “Funds”)), have adopted these proxy voting policies and procedures to help satisfy its fiduciary duties relating to proxy voting. Calamos recognizes the importance of maximizing and protecting the interests of its clients through its voting practices and of helping build stronger corporate governance within the companies in which its clients invest. To that end, these policies and procedures seek to further the voting of proxies in the best interests of our clients as investors.
Calamos has adopted and implemented these policies and procedures which we believe are reasonably designed to ensure that proxies are voted in the best interest of clients, in accordance with our fiduciary duties and SEC rule 206(4)-6 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Our authority to vote the proxies of our clients is established by our advisory contracts or comparable documents, and our proxy voting guidelines have been tailored to reflect these specific contractual obligations. In addition to SEC requirements governing advisers, our proxy voting policies reflect the long-standing fiduciary standards and responsibilities for ERISA accounts set out in Department of Labor Bulletin 94-2, 29 C.F.R. 2509.94-2 (July 29, 1994).
Responsibility of Calamos to Vote Proxies
Calamos has assigned its administrative duties with respect to the analysis and voting of proxies to its Risk Management Group within the Portfolio Management Department (“Proxy Group”) and administrative processing to its Corporate Actions Group (“Corporate Actions”) within the Operations Department. Additionally, to assist in analyzing, voting, administration, and reporting its proxy voting obligations, Calamos subscribes to a supplementary unaffiliated third party corporate proxy research service (“Proxy Voting Service(s)”) that provides in-depth analyses of shareholder meeting agendas, vote recommendations, record keeping, voting, administration, reporting, and vote disclosure services. In addition, this service facilitates the voting of each proxy in accordance with our proxy voting policy. The Proxy Group is responsible for maintaining oversight of all facets of the processes described above. As a matter of policy, the officers, directors and employees of Calamos and the Proxy Group will not be influenced by outside sources whose interests may conflict with the interests of Advisory Clients. Calamos votes each proxy while the Proxy Voting Service ensures that the decisions are implemented for each client. Calamos will generally follow its express policy with input from the Proxy Voting Services unless the Proxy Committee determines that the client’s best interests are served by voting otherwise. All proxies will be voted based upon Calamos’ instructions and/or policies.
H-1
Amended and Restated: March 26, 2010
Page 2 of 7
Responsibility and Oversight
Calamos has delegated its duties with respect to analysis and voting of proxies to its Proxy Group. The Proxy Group’s responsibilities consist of ensuring proxy statements of issuers whose stock is owned by any client (including the Calamos Funds and any separate accounts managed by Calamos) are voted according to our proxy policy. Unless otherwise directed by the client, the Proxy Group seeks to vote all proxies in the best interests of the client in terms of the perceived effect of the vote on the value of the client’s investment. The Proxy Group shall have responsibility for: i) voting the proxies of clients subject to these Policies and Procedures; (ii) overseeing the outside proxy administrator; (iii) implementing these Policies and Procedures; (iv) consulting with analysts for the relevant portfolio security (and the Proxy Committee if necessary); and (v) maintaining proxy voting records.
Based on the instruction provided by the Proxy Group and/or the principles inherent in our proxy policy, Corporate Actions will vote and process proxies. Proxies are voted solely in the interests of, the Calamos Funds, separate account clients, or, where employee benefit plan assets are involved, in the interests of the plan participants and beneficiaries (collectively, “Advisory Clients”) that have properly delegated such responsibility to Calamos. Corporate Actions shall have responsibility for: (i) identifying potential conflicts of interest and reporting them to the Proxy Review Committee; (ii) maintaining appropriate records pursuant to these procedures and applicable SEC rules; (iii) monitoring proxies are voted as directed by the Proxy Group or Proxy Review Committee; and (iv) ensuring that the voting process is timely.
Limitations Relating to Proxy Voting
Voting of Proxies on Securities Not Held. The Proxy Group will also decide whether to vote proxies for securities that are sold following a record date, but before a shareholder meeting date. In most cases, Calamos will vote all proxies received for securities not held on the shareholder meeting date. The Proxy Group considers various factors in deciding whether to vote such proxies, including Calamos’ long-term view of the issuer’s securities for investment.
Securities Lending. Certain Calamos Funds and Advisory Client accounts may participate in securities lending programs with various counterparties. If a fund or account participates in a securities lending program, the Proxy Group may attempt to recall the portfolio securities and vote proxies relating to such securities under certain circumstances. For example, if the Proxy Group determines that the votes involve matters that could have a material effect on the fund’s or account’s investment in such loaned securities. There can be no guarantee that any such securities can be retrieved for such purpose. With respect to securities lending transactions, the Proxy Group seeks to balance the economic benefits of continuing to participate in an open securities lending transaction against the inability to vote proxies. As a result, Calamos generally will not attempt to recall portfolio securities to vote proxies relating to routine matters. Fund of Funds. Calamos Multi-Fund Blend is structured as a fund of funds and invests its assets in shares of other Calamos Funds. The Proxy Group will vote Calamos Multi-Fund Blend shares in the underlying Calamos Funds in the same proportion as the vote of all other shareholders in the underlying Calamos Fund.
H-2
Amended and Restated: March 26, 2010
Page 3 of 7
Securities of Foreign Issuers. In certain foreign jurisdictions the voting of proxies on portfolio securities may result in additional restrictions that may have an economic impact or cost to the security holder. We believe that in some instances the best interest of our clients is served by abstaining or not voting such proxies. Examples of issues unique to foreign securities include, but are not limited to, the following (i) Share Blocking. In certain non-U.S. jurisdictions, a security holder that votes a proxy is prohibited from selling the security until the meeting for which the proxy has been voted is completed. This period of time may range from days to weeks. Since this blocking of sales prevents the sale of a security regardless of market conditions and developments, we believe it increases risk. Therefore, it often may be in the best interests of our investors not to vote such proxies. Whether we vote such proxies will be determined on a case by case basis.
(ii) Lack of Notice or Information. Foreign regulations do not standardize the notification period for a proxy vote. In some instances, the notice period is so short that we cannot research the issues presented. In instances where we have insufficient notice to permit us to cast a reasoned vote, we will abstain from voting on particular issues or not vote at all.
Conflicts of Interest
A. Identification of Conflicts of Interest. All conflicts of interest will be resolved in the interests of the Advisory Clients. Calamos makes its best efforts to avoid conflicts of interest. However, conflicts of interest can arise in situations where:
(i) The issuer is a client of Calamos or its affiliates;
(ii) The issuer is a vendor whose products or services are material or significant to the business of Calamos or its affiliates;
(iii) The issuer is an entity participating, or which may participate, in the distribution of investment products advised, administered or sponsored by Calamos or its affiliates (e.g., a broker, dealer or bank);
(iv) An employee of Calamos or its affiliates, also serves as a director or officer of the issuer;
(v) A director of Calamos Asset Management, Inc. or a Trustee of a Calamos Fund, also serves as an officer or director of the issuer; or
(vi) The issuer is Calamos Asset Management, Inc. or any of its proprietary investment products.
Material conflicts of interest are identified based upon analyses of client, broker and vendor lists, information periodically gathered from directors and officers, and information derived from other sources, including public filings.
H-3
Amended and Restated: March 26, 2010
Page 4 of 7
B. Establishment and Operation of Proxy Review Committee. In situations where a material conflict of interest is identified, the Proxy Group will refer the matter, along with the recommended course of action by Calamos, if any, to a Proxy Review Committee comprised of representatives from Portfolio Management (which may include portfolio managers and/or research analysts employed by Calamos), Operations, Legal and Compliance Departments within Calamos for evaluation and voting instructions. The Proxy Review Committee may defer to the voting recommendation of its proxy voting service, or those of another independent third party provider of proxy services or send the proxy directly to the relevant Advisory Clients with a recommendation regarding the vote for approval.
The Proxy Review Committee will independently review proxies that are identified as presenting material conflicts of interest; determine the appropriate action to be taken in such situations; report the results of such votes to Calamos’ clients as may be requested; and recommend changes to the Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures as appropriate.
The Proxy Review Committee will also decide whether to vote proxies for securities deemed to present conflicts of interest that are sold following a record date, but before a shareholder meeting date. The Proxy Review Committee may consider various factors in deciding whether to vote such proxies, including Calamos’ long-term view of the issuer’s securities for investment, or it may defer the decision to vote to the applicable Advisory Client.
C. Records of Corporate Actions. Corporate Actions will prepare a Conflicts Report for each situation where a material conflict of interest is identified that (1) describes any conflict of interest; (2) discusses the procedures used to address such conflict of interest; and (3) discloses any contacts from parties outside Calamos (other than routine communications from proxy solicitors) with respect to the proposal not otherwise reported. The Conflicts Report will also include written confirmation that any recommendation provided under circumstances where a conflict of interest is found to exist was made solely on the investment merits and without regard to any other consideration.
General Proxy Voting Guidelines
In keeping with its fiduciary obligations to its Advisory Clients, Calamos has adopted general guidelines for voting proxies as summarized below. Although these guidelines are to be followed as a general policy, in all cases each proxy and proposal will be considered based on the relevant facts and circumstances. Calamos may deviate from the general policies and procedures when it determines that the particular facts and circumstances warrant such deviation to protect the interests of the Advisory Clients. These guidelines cannot provide an exhaustive list of all the issues that may arise nor can Calamos anticipate all future situations. Corporate governance issues are diverse and continually evolving and Calamos devotes significant time and resources to monitor these changes. Calamos generally will vote proxies for securities over which we do not have trading authority that may be held in Advisory Client accounts. Calamos’ proxy voting positions have been developed based on years of experience with proxy voting and corporate governance issues. These principles have been reviewed by various members of Calamos’ organization, including Portfolio Management, Legal, Compliance, and Calamos’ officers. The Board of Trustees of the Calamos Funds is asked to approve the proxy voting policies and procedures annually.
H-4
Amended and Restated: March 26, 2010
Page 5 of 7
One of the primary factors Calamos considers when determining the desirability of investing in a particular company is the quality and depth of that company’s management. Accordingly, the recommendation of management on any issue is a factor that Calamos considers in determining how proxies should be voted. However, Calamos does not consider recommendations from management to be determinative of Calamos’ ultimate decision. As a matter of practice, the votes with respect to most issues are cast in accordance with the position of the company’s management. Each issue, however, is considered on its own merits, and Calamos will not support the position of a company’s management in any situation where it determines that the support of management’s position would adversely affect the investment merits of owning that company’s shares.
The following guidelines reflect what Calamos believes to be good corporate governance and behavior:
1. Corporate Governance and Structure
a. Board of Directors/Trustees. The election of directors and an independent board are vital to good corporate governance. Directors are expected to be competent individuals and they should be accountable and responsive to shareholders. Calamos seeks to ensure that the board of directors of a company is sufficiently aligned with security holders’ interests and provides proper oversight of the company’s management. In many cases this may be best accomplished by having a majority of independent board members. Although we will examine board member elections on a case-by-case basis, Calamos generally supports an independent board of directors, and prefers that key committees such as audit, nominating, and compensation committees be comprised of independent directors. For all other votes regarding boards of directors, we will vote on a case-by-case basis.
b. Ratification of Auditors. As needed, Calamos will examine proposals relating to non-audit relationships and non-audit fees. Calamos will vote against the ratification of auditors when there is clear and compelling evidence of accounting irregularities or negligence attributable to the auditors.
c. Merger, Acquisitions, Reincorporation and Other Transactions. Companies ask their shareholders to vote on an enormous variety of different types of transactions, including mergers, acquisitions, reincorporations and reorganizations involving business combinations, liquidations and the sale of all or substantially all of a company’s assets. Voting on such proposals involves considerations unique to each transaction. Therefore, we will vote on proposals to effect these types of transactions on a case-by-case basis.
d. Anti-Take Over Measures and Shareholder Voting Rights. Calamos generally opposes anti-takeover measures since they tend to reduce shareholder rights. However, as with all proxy issues, Calamos conducts an independent review of each anti-takeover proposal. On occasion, Calamos may vote with management when the research analyst has concluded that the proposal is not onerous and would not harm Advisory Clients’ interests as stockholders. Calamos generally supports proposals that require shareholder rights plans (“poison pills”) to be subject to a shareholder vote. Calamos will closely evaluate shareholder rights’ plans on a case-by-case basis to determine whether or not they warrant support.
H-5
Amended and Restated: March 26, 2010
Page 6 of 7
Calamos will generally vote against any proposal to issue stock that has unequal or subordinate voting rights.
e. Capital Structure. Calamos realizes that a company’s financing decisions have a significant impact on its shareholders, particularly when they involve the issuance of additional shares of common or preferred stock or the assumption of additional debt. In general Calamos respects management’s capital structure judgment and forecasting abilities. As needed, and with collaboration from our research analysts, Calamos will carefully review material proposals by companies to increase authorized shares and the purpose for the increase.
f. Social and Corporate Policy Issues. As a fiduciary, Calamos is primarily concerned about the financial interests of its Advisory Clients. Calamos will generally give management discretion with regard to social, environmental and ethical issues although Calamos may vote in favor of proposals regarding those issues that are believed to have significant economic benefits or implications.
g. Global Corporate Governance. Calamos manages investments in countries worldwide. Many of the tenets discussed above are applied to Calamos’ proxy voting decisions for international investments. However, Calamos must be flexible in these worldwide markets and must be mindful of the varied market practices of each region.
2. Executive Compensation and Option Plans. A company’s equity-based compensation plan should be in alignment with the shareholders’ long-term interests. Accordingly, proxy votes should be used to encourage the use of reasonably designed compensation plans that promote such alignment by providing officers and employees with an incentive to increase shareholder value. Calamos evaluates plans on a case-by-case basis by considering several factors to determine whether the plan is fair and reasonable. Calamos may review its proxy voting service’s analysis to assess such plans. Severance compensation arrangements will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, although Calamos will oppose “golden parachutes” that are considered excessive. Calamos will normally support proposals that require that a percentage of directors’ compensation be in the form of common stock, as it aligns their interests with those of the shareholders.
3. Other Business Matters Many proxy statements include the approval of routine business matters, such as changing the company’s name, and procedural matters relating to the shareholder meetings. Generally these routine matters do not materially affect shareholder interests adversely and are best left to the board of directors and senior management of the company. Thus, we will generally vote for board-approved proposals seeking to approve such matters.
Record Retention and Disclosure
A. Record Retention. The Adviser shall be responsible for collecting and maintaining proxy related information on each vote cast as required by applicable law unless such function is outsourced. Such information shall include (i) the name of the shareholder whose proxy is being voted; (ii) the name of the company; (iii) the exchange ticker symbols of the company; (iv) Security Identifier; (v) proxy statements; (vi) shareholder meeting date; (vii) brief identification of the matter voted on; (viii) whether the matter was proposed by the company or by a security holder; (ix) whether a vote was cast on the matter; (x) how the vote was cast (e.g., for or against proposal, or abstained, for or withheld regarding election of directors); (xi) whether the vote was cast for or against management; (xii) Conflicts Reports; and (xiii) any information created by Calamos or a third party needed by the Committee to make a voting determination. The above information shall be maintained in an easily accessible place for a period of not less than six years from the end of the fiscal year in which the information was created, with the first two years in an appropriate office of Calamos unless record retention is outsourced.
H-6
Amended and Restated: March 26, 2010
Page 7 of 7
B. Disclosure. The Adviser shall be responsible for appropriately disclosing proxy voting information, including these policies and procedures, the voting guidelines and the voting records of the Funds or clients as may be required by applicable law. Corporate Actions, in conjunction with legal staff responsible for coordinating Calamos Fund disclosure, will file all required Forms N-PX, on a timely basis with respect to investment company clients, disclose that its proxy voting record is available on the web site, and will make available the information disclosed in its Form N-PX as soon as is reasonable practicable after filing Form N-PX with the SEC. Corporate Actions, in conjunction with legal staff responsible for coordinating Fund disclosure, will ensure that all required disclosure about proxy voting of the investment company clients is made in such clients’ financial statements and disclosure documents.
Reports to the Funds’ Boards and Non-Investment Company Clients of Calamos
Corporate Actions shall provide proxy information to each Board of Trustee of the Funds as such Board may request from time to time.
For non-investment company clients of Calamos, Corporate Actions shall appropriately respond in writing to all written client requests for information on how it voted on behalf of the client. Such written request along with any written response to such written request or oral client request shall be maintained in an easily accessible place for a period of not less than five years from the end of the fiscal year, with the first two years in an appropriate office of Calamos.
H-7
