UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
Investment Company Act file number | 811-4257 |
DWS Variable Series I
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (212) 454-7190
Paul Schubert
345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
Date of fiscal year end: | 12/31 |
Date of reporting period: | 12/31/07 |
ITEM 1. REPORT TO STOCKHOLDERS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1b92/c1b92030b81ecdc1b768673b3f65cfca4aa9b045" alt="svs1_coverlogo0"
December 31, 2007
ANNUAL REPORT
DWS Bond VIP
DWS Growth & Income VIP
DWS Capital Growth VIP
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
DWS International VIP
DWS Health Care VIP
DWS VARIABLE SERIES I
Contents
Performance Summary, Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, Management Summary, Portfolio Summary, Investment Portfolio, Financial Statements and Financial Highlights for:
click here DWS Bond VIP
click here DWS Growth & Income VIP
click here DWS Capital Growth VIP
click here DWS Global Opportunities VIP
click here DWS International VIP
click here DWS Health Care VIP
click here Notes to Financial Statements
click here Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
click here Tax Information
click here Proxy Voting
click here Investment Management Agreement Approval
click here Summary of Management Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant
click here Trustees and Officers
This report must be preceded or accompanied by a prospectus. To obtain an additional prospectus, call (800) 778-1482 or your financial representative. We advise you to consider the product's objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other important information about the investment product. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest.
NOT FDIC/NCUA INSURED NO BANK GUARANTEE MAY LOSE VALUE NOT A DEPOSIT
NOT INSURED BY ANY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY
Investments in variable portfolios involve risk. Some portfolios have more risk than others. These include portfolios that allow exposure to or otherwise concentrate investments in certain sectors, geographic regions, security types, market capitalization or foreign securities (e.g., political or economic instability, which can be accentuated in Emerging Market countries). Please read the prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
DWS Scudder is part of Deutsche Asset Management, which is the marketing name in the US for the asset management activities of Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. and DWS Trust Company.
Performance Summary December 31, 2007
DWS Bond VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratios, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2007 are 0.66% and 1.04% for Class A and Class B shares, respectively. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2007.
Risk Considerations
Investments by the Portfolio in lower-rated bonds present greater risk to principal and income than investments in higher-quality securities. This Portfolio invests in individual bonds whose yields and market values fluctuate so that your investment may be worth more or less than its original cost. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk such that when interest rates rise, the prices of the bonds, and thus the value of the investment, can decline and the investor can lose principal value. Additionally, investing in foreign securities presents certain unique risks not associated with domestic investments, such as currency fluctuation and changes in political/economic conditions and market risks. All of these factors may result in greater share price volatility. In the current market environment, mortgage-backed securities are experiencing increased volatility. Please see this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS Bond VIP — Class A [] Lehman Brothers US Aggregate Index | The Lehman Brothers US Aggregate Index is an unmanaged, market value-weighted measure of Treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues and mortgage securities. Index returns, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5422/e54228c1bf263f4dd3c6c4263b5b7d679cdc8061" alt="svs1_g10k680" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS Bond VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $10,418 | $11,193 | $12,392 | $16,464 |
Average annual total return
| 4.18% | 3.83% | 4.38% | 5.11% |
Lehman Brothers US Aggregate Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,697 | $11,431 | $12,417 | $17,864 |
Average annual total return
| 6.97% | 4.56% | 4.42% | 5.97% |
DWS Bond VIP | | | 1-Year | Life of Class* |
Class B | Growth of $10,000
| | | $10,377 | $10,967 |
Average annual total return
| | | 3.77% | 3.53% |
Lehman Brothers US Aggregate Index
| Growth of $10,000
| | | $10,697 | $11,333 |
Average annual total return
| | | 6.97% | 4.80% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
* The Portfolio commenced offering Class B shares on May 2, 2005. Index returns began on April 30, 2005.Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS Bond VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2007 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 1,031.00 | | $ 1,029.60 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 2.97 | | $ 4.86 | |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 1,022.28 | | $ 1,020.42 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 2.96 | | $ 4.84 | |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 365.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A | | Class B | |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS Bond VIP
| 0.58% | | 0.95% | |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
Management Summary December 31, 2007
DWS Bond VIP
The last half of the year was the most eventful and did the most to determine fixed-income investor returns. In particular, the summer saw extreme volatility occasioned by the subprime mortgage crisis. As investors sought to protect against risks that were difficult to assess, liquidity disappeared in the broader fixed-income markets. Ultimately, this risk aversion caused a period of very high financial market volatility as well as a flight to quality, manifested by increased interest in "risk-free" US Treasury securities. Between September and November, the US Federal Reserve Board (the Fed) lowered the benchmark short-term rate by 100 basis points (one percentage point) to 4.25%.
During the 12-month period ended December 31, 2007, the Portfolio provided a total return of 4.18% (Class A shares, unadjusted for contract charges) compared with the 6.97% return of its benchmark, the Lehman Brothers US Aggregate Index.
An emphasis on fixed-income sectors that trade at a yield spread to Treasuries detracted from relative performance as investors sought refuge in the government backing of Treasuries during the second half of the year.1 We had increased exposure to commercial mortgage-backed securities in the middle of 2007 as their yield spreads versus Treasuries tripled. However, these spreads tripled yet again as Treasuries continued to outperform. Within the residential mortgage sector our allocation to prime hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) suffered from the same liquidity drain as all short-term spread sectors.2 While the Portfolio was underweight corporate bonds, within that sector it was overweight financials, which underperformed duration-equivalent Treasuries by a wide margin.3 While the Portfolio's high-yield corporate and emerging-market holdings underperformed, relatively defensive positioning within the high-yield sector helped to limit the downside impact. Long positions in undervalued, fundamentally sound currencies and short positions in higher-yielding currencies added to performance.
The following members of the management team handle the day-to-day operations of the high-yield and core bond, active fixed-income and high-yield portions of the Portfolio. |
Portfolio Managers, Aberdeen Asset Management, Inc., Subadvisor to the Portfolio |
Gary W. Bartlett, CFA Warren S. Davis, III | Thomas J. Flaherty J. Christopher Gagnier | Daniel R. Taylor, CFA Timothy C. Vile, CFA | William T. Lissenden |
The following portfolio managers are responsible for the day-to-day management of the foreign securities, foreign currencies and related investments for the Portfolio. |
Portfolio Managers, Aberdeen Asset Management Investment Services Limited, Sub-subadvisor to the Portfolio |
Brett Diment Annette Fraser | Anthony Fletcher Nik Hart | Stephen Ilott Ian Winship | Matthew Cobon |
Risk Considerations
Investments by the Portfolio in lower-rated bonds present greater risk to principal and income than investments in higher-quality securities. This Portfolio invests in individual bonds whose yields and market values fluctuate so that your investment may be worth more or less than its original cost. Bond investments are subject to interest-rate risk such that when interest rates rise, the prices of the bonds, and thus the value of the investment, can decline and the investor can lose principal value. Additionally, investing in foreign securities presents certain unique risks not associated with domestic investments, such as currency fluctuation and changes in political/economic conditions and market risks. Derivatives may be more volatile and less liquid than traditional securities, and the Portfolio could suffer losses on an underlying Portfolio's derivative position. Investing in securities of emerging markets presents certain unique risks not associated with domestic investments, such as currency fluctuation, political and economic changes and market risks. All of these factors may result in greater share price volatility. In the current market environment, mortgage-backed securities are experiencing increased volatility. Please see this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
The Lehman Brothers US Aggregate Index is an unmanaged, market-value-weighted measure of Treasury issues, agency issues, corporate bond issues and mortgage securities.
Index returns, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
1 The yield spread is the difference between the yield of a security and the yield of a comparable duration Treasury. A large spread indicates that investors require yields substantially above those of Treasuries in order to invest in lower-quality bonds. This is generally indicative of a higher-risk environment. A smaller spread generally indicates a more positive environment, since investors are less concerned about risk and therefore willing to accept lower yields. A drop in the yield spread is a positive.2 A prime hybrid ARM loan is one made to a borrower with a positive credit history and features an interest rate that is fixed for an initial period of time, then floats thereafter. Spread sectors are non-Treasury bond sectors of the fixed-income market.3 "Overweight" means the portfolio holds a higher weighting in a given sector or security than the benchmark. "Underweight" means the portfolio holds a lower weighting.Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2007, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Portfolio Summary
DWS Bond VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Commercial and Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities | 35% | 28% |
Corporate Bonds | 24% | 26% |
Government & Agency Obligations | 17% | 11% |
Mortgage Backed Securities Pass-Throughs | 15% | 13% |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations | 4% | 11% |
Cash Equivalents | 2% | 3% |
Municipal Bonds and Notes | 2% | 5% |
Asset Backed | 1% | 3% |
| 100% | 100% |
Quality (Excludes Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
US Government & Treasury Obligations | 36% | 34% |
AAA* | 35% | 36% |
AA | 3% | — |
A | 7% | 6% |
BBB | 13% | 14% |
BB or Below | 6% | 10% |
| 100% | 100% |
Effective Maturity (Excludes Cash Equivalents and Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Under 1 year | 3% | 9% |
1-4.99 years | 45% | 35% |
5-9.99 years | 41% | 39% |
10-14.99 years | 1% | 7% |
15+ years | 10% | 10% |
| 100% | 100% |
* Category includes cash equivalentsWeighted average effective maturity: 6.99 and 7.95 years, respectively.
Asset allocation, quality and effective maturity are subject to change.
The quality ratings represent the lower of Moody's Investors Service, Inc. ("Moody's") or Standard & Poor's Corporation ("S&P") credit ratings. The ratings of Moody's and S&P represent their opinions as to the quality of the securities they rate. Ratings are relative and subjective and are not absolute standards of quality. The Portfolio's credit quality does not remove market risk.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 21. Information concerning portfolio holdings of the Portfolio as of month-end will be posted to www.dws-scudder.com on or after the last day of the following month.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2007
DWS Bond VIP
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Corporate Bonds 23.9% |
Consumer Discretionary 1.2% |
AutoNation, Inc., 7.0%, 4/15/2014 | 133,000 | 126,017 |
Avis Budget Car Rental LLC, 7.625%, 5/15/2014 (b) | 130,000 | 124,150 |
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.: | | |
7.875%, 3/15/2010 | 248,000 | 233,120 |
8.125%, 5/15/2011 (b) | 168,000 | 156,240 |
Comcast Cable Holdings LLC, 10.125%, 4/15/2022 | 168,000 | 222,757 |
Great Canadian Gaming Corp., 144A, 7.25%, 2/15/2015 | 75,000 | 74,250 |
INVISTA, 144A, 9.25%, 5/1/2012 | 334,000 | 345,690 |
Quebecor Media, Inc., 144A, 7.75%, 3/15/2016 | 31,000 | 29,760 |
Station Casinos, Inc., 6.5%, 2/1/2014 (b) | 274,000 | 205,500 |
TCI Communications, Inc., 8.75%, 8/1/2015 | 511,000 | 594,398 |
Valassis Communications, Inc., 8.25%, 3/1/2015 (b) | 127,000 | 113,189 |
Viacom, Inc., 5.75%, 4/30/2011 | 458,000 | 463,761 |
| 2,688,832 |
Consumer Staples 1.1% |
Constellation Brands, Inc.: | | |
7.25%, 9/1/2016 (b) | 139,000 | 130,313 |
144A, 7.25%, 5/15/2017 | 165,000 | 152,625 |
8.375%, 12/15/2014 | 66,000 | 66,165 |
CVS Caremark Corp.: | | |
6.25%, 6/1/2027 | 332,000 | 332,718 |
6.302%, 6/1/2037 | 1,050,000 | 1,014,869 |
Dean Foods Co., 7.0%, 6/1/2016 | 205,000 | 182,450 |
Tesco PLC, 144A, 6.15%, 11/15/2037 | 600,000 | 586,163 |
| 2,465,303 |
Energy 1.5% |
Allis-Chalmers Energy, Inc., 8.5%, 3/1/2017 | 165,000 | 157,575 |
Alpha Natural Resources LLC, 10.0%, 6/1/2012 | 75,000 | 79,313 |
Basic Energy Services, Inc., 7.125%, 4/15/2016 (b) | 191,000 | 179,540 |
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., 6.5%, 2/15/2037 | 180,000 | 180,405 |
Dynegy Holdings, Inc., 7.5%, 6/1/2015 | 160,000 | 149,600 |
Enbridge Energy Partners LP, 8.05%, 10/1/2037 | 61,000 | 60,246 |
Enterprise Products Operating LP, 8.375%, 8/1/2066 | 367,000 | 375,750 |
Forest Oil Corp., 144A, 7.25%, 6/15/2019 | 64,000 | 64,320 |
Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., 144A, 9.5%, 1/15/2016 (b) | 48,000 | 48,840 |
Petroleos de Venezuela SA, 5.375%, 4/12/2027 | 310,000 | 187,860 |
Southern Union Co., 7.2%, 11/1/2066 | 190,000 | 186,880 |
Tesoro Corp., 6.625%, 11/1/2015 | 296,000 | 293,040 |
TransCanada PipeLines Ltd., 6.35%, 5/15/2067 | 684,000 | 641,099 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Valero Energy Corp., 6.625%, 6/15/2037 | 560,000 | 563,961 |
Williams Partners LP, 7.25%, 2/1/2017 | 240,000 | 247,200 |
| 3,415,629 |
Financials 11.6% |
AES El Salvador Trust, 144A, 6.75%, 2/1/2016 | 475,000 | 470,962 |
American Express Centurion Bank, 5.55%, 10/17/2012 | 975,000 | 992,121 |
American International Group, Inc., 6.25%, 3/15/2037 | 900,000 | 804,977 |
Arch Western Finance, 6.75%, 7/1/2013 | 129,000 | 125,130 |
Axa, 144A, 6.379%, 12/14/2049 | 500,000 | 430,901 |
Banco Mercantil del Norte SA, Series A, 144A, 6.862%, 10/13/2021 | 362,000 | 356,172 |
Banque Centrale de Tunisie, 8.25%, 9/19/2027 | 80,000 | 99,256 |
Bear Stearns Companies, Inc., 6.4%, 10/2/2017 | 430,000 | 415,449 |
Catlin Insurance Co., Ltd., 144A, 7.249%, 12/31/2049 | 208,000 | 190,175 |
ComEd Financing III, 6.35%, 3/15/2033 | 238,000 | 186,939 |
Corp. Andina de Fomento: | | |
5.75%, 1/12/2017 | 315,000 | 311,855 |
6.875%, 3/15/2012 | 115,000 | 122,708 |
Discover Financial Services, 144A, 5.663%*, 6/11/2010 | 550,000 | 523,457 |
EDP Finance BV, 144A, 5.375%, 11/2/2012 | 865,000 | 865,876 |
Erac USA Finance Co.: | | |
144A, 5.8%, 10/15/2012 | 340,000 | 337,304 |
144A, 7.0%, 10/15/2037 | 950,000 | 862,818 |
144A, 8.0%, 1/15/2011 | 330,000 | 353,088 |
ESI Tractebel Acquisition Corp., Series B, 7.99%, 12/30/2011 (b) | 114,000 | 115,183 |
Farmers Exchange Capital, 144A, 7.2%, 7/15/2048 | 385,000 | 377,024 |
Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC: | | |
7.8%, 6/1/2012 | 100,000 | 87,666 |
7.993%*, 1/13/2012 | 109,000 | 91,556 |
FPL Group Capital, Inc.: | | |
6.65%, 6/15/2067 | 360,000 | 346,720 |
Series D, 7.3%, 9/1/2067 | 63,000 | 64,373 |
General Electric Capital Corp., 5.0%, 4/10/2012 | 654,000 | 662,055 |
Glen Meadow Pass-Through Trust, 144A, 6.505%, 2/12/2067 | 605,000 | 575,276 |
GMAC LLC: | | |
6.625%, 5/15/2012 | 399,000 | 331,695 |
8.0%, 11/1/2031 | 45,000 | 37,749 |
Goldman Sachs Capital II, 5.793%, 12/29/2049 | 1,720,000 | 1,531,359 |
ICICI Bank Ltd., 144A, 5.75%, 1/12/2012 | 555,000 | 533,857 |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XXII, Series V, 6.45%, 2/2/2037 (b) | 66,000 | 58,752 |
Lincoln National Corp., 6.3%, 10/9/2037 | 340,000 | 330,619 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Mangrove Bay Pass-Through Trust, 144A, 6.102%, 7/15/2033 | 540,000 | 484,871 |
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., 6.22%, 9/15/2026 | 320,000 | 294,647 |
MUFG Capital Finance 1 Ltd., 6.346%, 7/29/2049 | 945,000 | 895,042 |
NLV Financial Corp., 144A, 6.5%, 3/15/2035 | 734,000 | 676,880 |
Nuveen Investments, Inc., 144A, 10.5%, 11/15/2015 | 106,000 | 105,603 |
Oil Insurance Ltd., 144A, 7.558%, 12/29/2049 | 1,505,000 | 1,533,369 |
Red Arrow International Leasing, "A", 8.375%, 6/30/2012 RUB | 3,538,403 | 143,836 |
Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC, 7.64%, 3/31/2049 | 1,800,000 | 1,850,567 |
Santander Perpetual SA Unipersonal, 144A, 6.671%, 10/29/2049 | 500,000 | 501,344 |
SMFG Preferred Capital, 144A, 6.078%, 1/29/2049 | 1,100,000 | 1,013,342 |
SPI Electricity & Gas Australia Holdings Property Ltd., 144A, 6.15%, 11/15/2013 | 425,000 | 433,664 |
Standard Chartered Bank, 144A, 6.4%, 9/26/2017 | 345,000 | 350,345 |
The Travelers Companies, Inc., 6.25%, 3/15/2037 | 135,000 | 126,601 |
TNK-BP Finance SA: | | |
144A, 7.5%, 3/13/2013 | 445,000 | 443,887 |
144A, 7.875%, 3/13/2018 (b) | 265,000 | 261,688 |
UDR, Inc., Series E, (REIT), 3.9%, 3/15/2010 | 245,000 | 238,399 |
USB Capital IX, 6.189%, 4/15/2049 | 140,000 | 126,702 |
Wachovia Capital Trust III, 5.8%, 3/15/2042 | 1,710,000 | 1,527,970 |
Washington Mutual Preferred Funding III, 144A, 6.895%, 12/31/2049 | 600,000 | 354,000 |
Wells Fargo & Co., 5.25%, 10/23/2012 (b) | 690,000 | 701,476 |
White Mountains RE Group, Ltd., 144A, 6.375%, 3/20/2017 | 245,000 | 237,374 |
Woori Bank, 144A, 6.208%, 5/2/2037 | 470,000 | 407,998 |
XL Capital Ltd., Series E, 6.5%, 12/31/2049 | 966,000 | 844,633 |
Xstrata Finance Canada Ltd., 144A, 6.9%, 11/15/2037 | 585,000 | 581,854 |
| 26,729,164 |
Health Care 0.2% |
Advanced Medical Optics, Inc., 7.5%, 5/1/2017 | 70,000 | 64,400 |
Community Health Systems, Inc., 8.875%, 7/15/2015 (b) | 164,000 | 167,075 |
Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 6.95%, 7/1/2037 | 260,000 | 274,914 |
| 506,389 |
Industrials 1.1% |
America West Airlines, Inc., Series 99-1, 7.93%, 1/2/2019 | 211,466 | 219,661 |
Arizona Public Service Co., 5.625%, 5/15/2033 | 550,000 | 480,580 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Grant Prideco, Inc., Series B, 6.125%, 8/15/2015 | 161,000 | 168,245 |
Iron Mountain, Inc., 8.625%, 4/1/2013 | 70,000 | 70,875 |
Kansas City Southern de Mexico SA de CV, 9.375%, 5/1/2012 | 460,000 | 481,850 |
Northwest Pipelines Corp., 5.95%, 4/15/2017 | 450,000 | 447,750 |
R.H. Donnelley Corp., 144A, 8.875%, 10/15/2017 | 92,000 | 85,100 |
SemGroup LP, 144A, 8.75%, 11/15/2015 | 87,000 | 82,650 |
Terex Corp., 8.0%, 11/15/2017 (b) | 92,000 | 93,150 |
TransDigm, Inc., 7.75%, 7/15/2014 | 22,000 | 22,330 |
United States Steel Corp., 5.65%, 6/1/2013 | 441,000 | 427,185 |
| 2,579,376 |
Information Technology 0.5% |
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., 6.125%, 6/1/2017 | 494,000 | 488,211 |
Tyco Electronics Group SA, 144A, 6.0%, 10/1/2012 | 695,000 | 712,201 |
| 1,200,412 |
Materials 1.0% |
Celulosa Arauco y Constitucion SA: | | |
5.125%, 7/9/2013 | 274,000 | 267,845 |
5.625%, 4/20/2015 | 385,000 | 376,000 |
Domtar Corp., 5.375%, 12/1/2013 | 190,000 | 171,475 |
Freeport-McMoRan Copper & Gold, Inc., 8.375%, 4/1/2017 | 231,000 | 247,748 |
Georgia-Pacific Corp., 8.125%, 5/15/2011 | 351,000 | 356,265 |
Huntsman International LLC, 7.375%, 1/1/2015 (b) | 104,000 | 109,200 |
Momentive Performance Materials, Inc., 144A, 9.75%, 12/1/2014 | 230,000 | 211,600 |
Pliant Corp., 11.625%, 6/15/2009 (PIK) | 7 | 7 |
Sappi Papier Holding AG, 144A, 6.75%, 6/15/2012 | 85,000 | 83,438 |
Smurfit-Stone Container Enterprises, Inc., 8.0%, 3/15/2017 (b) | 138,000 | 133,343 |
Steel Dynamics, Inc., 144A, 7.375%, 11/1/2012 | 173,000 | 173,865 |
The Mosaic Co., 144A, 7.625%, 12/1/2014 | 157,000 | 167,990 |
Westlake Chemical Corp., 6.625%, 1/15/2016 | 37,000 | 34,965 |
| 2,333,741 |
Telecommunication Services 1.3% |
AT&T, Inc., 6.3%, 1/15/2038 | 500,000 | 507,996 |
British Telecommunications PLC, 5.15%, 1/15/2013 | 600,000 | 598,702 |
Citizens Communications Co., 9.0%, 8/15/2031 (b) | 88,000 | 87,780 |
Nextel Communications, Inc., Series D, 7.375%, 8/1/2015 | 172,000 | 169,354 |
Nordic Telephone Co. Holdings, 144A, 10.107%*, 5/1/2016 EUR | 155,000 | 230,017 |
Qwest Corp.: | | |
7.5%, 10/1/2014 | 265,000 | 268,975 |
7.625%, 6/15/2015 | 309,000 | 314,408 |
Telecom Italia Capital, 6.2%, 7/18/2011 | 175,000 | 179,852 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
US Unwired, Inc., Series B, 10.0%, 6/15/2012 | 480,000 | 508,883 |
| 2,865,967 |
Utilities 4.4% |
AES Corp.: | | |
144A, 8.0%, 10/15/2017 (b) | 80,000 | 81,800 |
144A, 8.75%, 5/15/2013 | 44,000 | 45,925 |
9.5%, 6/1/2009 | 99,000 | 102,465 |
Allegheny Energy Supply Co., LLC, 144A, 8.25%, 4/15/2012 | 365,000 | 389,637 |
Baltimore Gas & Electric Co., 6.35%, 10/1/2036 | 260,000 | 257,863 |
CMS Energy Corp., 8.5%, 4/15/2011 | 35,000 | 37,702 |
Commonwealth Edison Co.: | | |
Series 98, 6.15%, 3/15/2012 | 550,000 | 569,446 |
6.95%, 7/15/2018 | 310,000 | 313,487 |
Constellation Energy Group, 7.6%, 4/1/2032 | 205,000 | 230,617 |
Dominion Resources, Inc.: | | |
Series 06-B, 6.3%, 9/30/2066 | 330,000 | 320,903 |
7.5%, 6/30/2066 | 935,000 | 924,401 |
Edison Mission Energy: | | |
7.0%, 5/15/2017 | 57,000 | 56,002 |
7.5%, 6/15/2013 (b) | 208,000 | 213,200 |
Energy East Corp., 6.75%, 7/15/2036 | 545,000 | 551,072 |
Energy Future Holdings Corp., 7.48%, 1/1/2017 | 387,152 | 351,209 |
Entergy Mississippi, Inc., 5.92%, 2/1/2016 | 225,000 | 224,183 |
Exelon Generation Co., LLC: | | |
5.35%, 1/15/2014 | 295,000 | 287,093 |
6.2%, 10/1/2017 | 390,000 | 387,593 |
FPL Energy National Wind, 144A, 5.608%, 3/10/2024 | 494,999 | 495,143 |
Integrys Energy Group, Inc., 6.11%, 12/1/2066 | 580,000 | 534,111 |
Intergen NV, 144A, 9.0%, 6/30/2017 | 150,000 | 157,875 |
Mirant Mid Atlantic LLC, Series A, 8.625%, 6/30/2012 | 115,810 | 122,180 |
NRG Energy, Inc.: | | |
7.375%, 2/1/2016 | 145,000 | 141,375 |
7.375%, 1/15/2017 | 258,000 | 251,550 |
Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Series 2002-A, 144A, 6.202%, 11/15/2032 | 315,000 | 318,364 |
PPL Capital Funding, Inc., Series A, 6.7%, 3/30/2067 | 830,000 | 763,681 |
PSE&G Energy Holdings LLC, 10.0%, 10/1/2009 (b) | 105,000 | 110,671 |
Regency Energy Partners LP, 8.375%, 12/15/2013 | 199,000 | 204,970 |
Reliant Energy, Inc., 6.75%, 12/15/2014 | 177,000 | 177,442 |
Sierra Pacific Power Co., Series P, 6.75%, 7/1/2037 (b) | 550,000 | 568,532 |
Wisconsin Energy Corp., Series A, 6.25%, 5/15/2067 | 955,000 | 885,649 |
| 10,076,141 |
Total Corporate Bonds (Cost $56,892,430) | 54,860,954 |
|
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Asset Backed 0.5% |
Automobile Receivables 0.0% |
Drive Auto Receivables Trust, "A2", Series 2005-2, 144A, 4.12%, 1/15/2010 | 40,436 | 40,426 |
Home Equity Loans 0.5% |
Chase Funding Loan Acquisition Trust, "IA5", Series 2001-C2, 6.468%, 2/25/2013 | 748,538 | 747,219 |
Soundview Home Equity Loan Trust, "A2", Series 2005-CTX1, 5.195%, 11/25/2035 | 315,715 | 314,253 |
| 1,061,472 |
Total Asset Backed (Cost $1,102,578) | 1,101,898 |
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities Pass-Throughs 14.8% |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | |
5.5%, with various maturities from 10/1/2023 until 8/1/2024 | 811,248 | 814,828 |
6.5%, 3/1/2026 | 1,542,671 | 1,620,177 |
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | |
4.5%, with various maturities from 5/1/2019 until 6/1/2034 | 5,965,348 | 5,846,628 |
5.0%, with various maturities from 7/1/2033 until 5/1/2034 | 4,770,938 | 4,662,908 |
5.5%, with various maturities from 1/1/2025 until 7/1/2037 | 12,629,598 | 12,619,385 |
6.0%, with various maturities from 4/1/2024 until 3/1/2025 | 1,522,863 | 1,551,178 |
6.31%, 6/1/2008 | 1,700,000 | 1,701,324 |
6.5%, with various maturities from 3/1/2017 until 4/1/2037 | 4,994,264 | 5,135,354 |
8.0%, 9/1/2015 | 34,924 | 37,449 |
Total Mortgage Backed Securities Pass-Throughs (Cost $33,529,770) | 33,989,231 |
|
Commercial and Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities 35.3% |
Adjustable Rate Mortgage Trust, "3A31", Series 2005-10, 5.416%*, 1/25/2036 | 820,000 | 781,030 |
American Home Mortgage Investment Trust, "5A3", Series 2005-2, 5.077%, 9/25/2035 | 1,050,000 | 1,010,832 |
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage, Inc., "AM", Series 2007-4, 5.812%, 2/10/2051 | 305,000 | 308,086 |
Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., "1A20", Series 2005-3, 5.5%, 4/25/2035 | 1,095,000 | 1,098,740 |
Bear Stearns Adjustable Rate Mortgage Trust: | | |
"A1", Series 2006-1, 4.625%*, 2/25/2036 | 2,560,877 | 2,522,324 |
"2A1", Series 2006-4, 5.802%*, 10/25/2036 | 748,382 | 753,697 |
"3A1", Series 2007-5, 6.0%*, 8/25/2047 | 1,694,318 | 1,673,106 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
"22A1", Series 2007-4, 6.007%*, 6/25/2047 | 1,693,452 | 1,670,413 |
Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities: | | |
"A2", Series 2007-PW16, 5.661%*, 6/11/2040 | 1,650,000 | 1,679,992 |
"AAB", Series 2007-PW16, 5.713%*, 6/11/2040 | 1,200,000 | 1,228,397 |
Chase Mortgage Finance Corp., "3A1", Series 2005-A1, 5.281%*, 12/25/2035 | 1,319,485 | 1,299,343 |
Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc., "3A1", Series 2004-1, 4.75%, 1/25/2034 | 1,643,061 | 1,617,736 |
Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc.: | | |
"1A2", Series 2006-AR2, 5.532%*, 3/25/2036 | 1,118,658 | 1,124,370 |
"2A1A", Series 2007-AR8, 5.925%*, 7/25/2037 | 747,878 | 750,386 |
"1CB2", Series 2004-NCM2, 6.75%, 8/25/2034 | 656,588 | 674,850 |
CitiMortgage Alternative Loan Trust, "A1", Series 2006-A2, 6.0%, 5/25/2036 | 1,118,477 | 1,120,110 |
Countrywide Alternative Loan Trust: | | |
"1A1", Series 2004-2CB, 4.25%, 3/25/2034 | 367,658 | 361,339 |
"A1", Series 2004-1T1, 5.0%, 2/25/2034 | 390,361 | 383,896 |
"A2", Series 2002-18, 5.25%, 2/25/2033 | 707,190 | 705,787 |
"A2", Series 2003-21T1, 5.25%, 12/25/2033 | 580,187 | 579,405 |
"A2", Series 2004-1T1, 5.5%, 2/25/2034 | 259,253 | 257,259 |
Countrywide Capital Cobalt, "AAB", Series 2006-C1, 5.223%, 8/15/2048 | 559,000 | 555,046 |
Countrywide Home Loans: | | |
"2A2C", Series 2006-HYB1, 5.217%*, 3/20/2036 | 930,000 | 930,433 |
"2A1", Series 2006-HYB1, 5.337%*, 3/20/2036 | 647,939 | 645,345 |
"A1", Series 2005-29, 5.75%, 12/25/2035 | 1,193,312 | 1,176,158 |
"A2", Series 2006-1, 6.0%, 3/25/2036 | 896,864 | 899,667 |
Credit Suisse Mortgage Capital Certificates, Inc.: | | |
"3A1", Series 2006-9, 6.0%, 11/25/2036 | 1,344,998 | 1,335,751 |
"3A19", Series 2007-5, 6.0%, 8/25/2037 | 1,123,993 | 1,119,076 |
First Franklin Mortgage Loan Asset Backed Certificate, "A2A", Series 2007-FFC, 5.015%*, 6/25/2027 | 880,997 | 841,946 |
GE Capital Commercial Mortgage Corp., "AJ", Series 2007-C1, 5.677%, 12/10/2049 | 1,160,000 | 1,106,053 |
GMAC Mortgage Corp. Loan Trust, "A1", Series 2006-J1, 5.75%, 4/25/2036 | 1,176,278 | 1,185,969 |
Greenwich Capital Commercial Funding Corp., "A2", Series 2007-GG9, 5.381%, 3/10/2039 | 775,000 | 779,022 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
GS Mortgage Securities Corp. II: | | |
"A2", Series 2006-GG8, 5.479%, 11/10/2039 | 1,100,000 | 1,110,874 |
"A2", Series 2007-GG10, 5.778%, 8/10/2045 | 1,640,000 | 1,671,513 |
"AAB", Series 2007-GG10, 5.799%*, 8/10/2045 | 1,620,000 | 1,661,658 |
"J", Series 2007-GG10, 144A, 5.799%*, 8/10/2045 | 1,096,000 | 698,167 |
"K", Series GG10, 144A, 5.799%*, 8/10/2045 | 767,000 | 449,584 |
GSR Mortgage Loan Trust, "2A1", Series 2007-AR1, 6.002%*, 3/25/2037 | 1,682,577 | 1,683,749 |
Indymac Index Mortgage Loan Trust, "3A1", Series 2006-AR33, 5.782%*, 1/25/2037 | 853,290 | 851,012 |
JPMorgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.: | | |
"A3A1", Series 2005-LDP4, 4.871%, 10/15/2042 | 235,000 | 232,665 |
"ASB", Series 2007-CB19, 5.73%*, 2/12/2049 | 880,000 | 901,536 |
"F", Series 2007-LD11, 5.819%*, 6/15/2049 | 650,000 | 542,671 |
"G", Series 2007-LD11, 144A, 5.819%*, 6/15/2049 | 760,000 | 617,645 |
"H", Series 2007-LD11, 144A, 5.819%*, 6/15/2049 | 460,000 | 313,351 |
"ASB", Series 2007-LD12, 5.833%, 2/15/2051 | 1,175,000 | 1,205,071 |
JPMorgan Mortgage Trust, "2A4", Series 2006-A2, 5.752%*, 4/25/2036 | 1,420,000 | 1,393,714 |
Master Alternative Loans Trust: | | |
"5A1", Series 2005-1, 5.5%, 1/25/2020 | 898,430 | 884,415 |
"5A1", Series 2005-2, 6.5%, 12/25/2034 | 116,859 | 119,160 |
"8A1", Series 2004-3, 7.0%, 4/25/2034 | 27,037 | 27,334 |
Master Asset Securitization Trust, "2A7", Series 2003-9, 5.5%, 10/25/2033 | 544,420 | 538,806 |
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Trust, "A2", Series 2005-A5, 4.566%, 6/25/2035 | 105,000 | 103,808 |
Merrill Lynch Mortgage Trust, "ASB", Series 2007-C1, 5.829%*, 6/12/2050 | 590,000 | 608,451 |
Merrill Lynch/Countrywide Commercial Mortgage Trust, "ASB", Series 2007-5, 5.362%, 8/12/2048 | 1,000,000 | 1,000,195 |
Morgan Stanley Capital I: | | |
"A2", Series 2007-HQ11, 5.359%, 2/12/2044 | 1,600,000 | 1,605,944 |
"AAB", Series 2007-IQ14, 5.654%, 4/15/2049 | 1,105,000 | 1,121,720 |
"F", Series 1998-HF1, 144A, 7.18%, 3/15/2030 | 925,000 | 925,214 |
New York Mortgage Trust, "2A3", Series 2006-1, 5.649%*, 5/25/2036 | 1,100,000 | 1,110,172 |
Residential Accredit Loans, Inc.: | | |
"3A1", Series 2006-QS18, 5.75%, 12/25/2021 | 817,965 | 818,342 |
"CB", Series 2004-QS2, 5.75%, 2/25/2034 | 555,675 | 551,160 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Residential Funding Mortgage Security I, "2A2", Series 2007-SA1, 5.622%*, 2/25/2037 | 1,429,305 | 1,433,849 |
Sequoia Mortgage Trust, "2A1", Series 2007-1, 5.823%*, 2/20/2047 | 1,460,947 | 1,472,545 |
Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust: | | |
"1A4", Series 2005-22, 5.25%, 12/25/2035 | 1,160,000 | 1,160,494 |
"6A3", Series 2005-21, 5.4%, 11/25/2035 | 740,000 | 691,729 |
"5A1", Series 2005-18, 5.529%*, 9/25/2035 | 546,122 | 540,873 |
"7A4", Series 2006-1, 5.62%, 2/25/2036 | 930,000 | 884,201 |
Structured Asset Securities Corp., "2A1", Series 2003-1, 6.0%, 2/25/2018 | 4,427 | 4,432 |
SunTrust Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust, "3A1", Series 2007-4, 6.007%*, 10/25/2037 | 1,695,993 | 1,692,167 |
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust: | | |
"A3", Series 2007-C30, 5.246%, 12/15/2043 | 770,000 | 768,614 |
"A2", Series 2007-C31, 5.421%, 4/15/2047 | 1,080,000 | 1,084,795 |
"H", Series 2007-C32, 144A, 5.741%*, 6/15/2049 | 770,000 | 533,977 |
"J", Series 2007-C32, 144A, 5.741%*, 6/15/2049 | 770,000 | 485,706 |
"K", Series 2007-C32, 144A, 5.741%*, 6/15/2049 | 1,010,000 | 581,434 |
"ABP", Series 2007-C32, 5.741%*, 6/15/2049 | 720,000 | 735,700 |
Wachovia Mortgage Loan Trust LLC, "3A1", Series 2005-B, 5.154%*, 10/20/2035 | 1,157,902 | 1,137,820 |
Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Trust: | | |
"2A1", Series 2002-S8, 4.5%, 1/25/2018 | 28,741 | 28,681 |
"1A3", Series 2005-AR16, 5.101%*, 12/25/2035 | 825,000 | 822,086 |
"1A1", Series 2006-AR18, 5.347%*, 1/25/2037 | 1,253,268 | 1,250,176 |
"4A1", Series 2007-HY3, 5.35%*, 3/25/2037 | 1,694,696 | 1,686,884 |
"1A1", Series 2007-HY4, 5.554%*, 4/25/2037 | 1,482,983 | 1,476,042 |
"1A1", Series 2007-HY2, 5.628%*, 12/25/2036 | 1,466,424 | 1,472,647 |
Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities Trust: | | |
"B1", Series 2005-AR12, 4.328%*, 7/25/2035 | 760,301 | 736,410 |
"2A5", Series 2006-AR2, 5.103%*, 3/25/2036 | 2,674,574 | 2,653,397 |
"A4", Series 2005-AR14, 5.388%*, 8/25/2035 | 945,000 | 897,135 |
"2A5", Series 2006-AR1, 5.553%*, 3/25/2036 | 935,000 | 883,350 |
"1A3", Series 2006-6, 5.75%, 5/25/2036 | 911,623 | 919,628 |
Total Commercial and Non-Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (Cost $82,300,199) | 80,958,267 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations 4.1% |
Fannie Mae Whole Loan, "1A1", Series 2004-W15, 6.0%, 8/25/2044 | 310,081 | 322,067 |
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.: | | |
"WJ", Series 2557, 5.0%, 7/15/2014 | 457,306 | 459,019 |
"EG", Series 2836, 5.0%, 12/15/2032 | 1,580,000 | 1,545,505 |
"PD", Series 2893, 5.0%, 2/15/2033 | 800,000 | 780,703 |
"OG", Series 2889, 5.0%, 5/15/2033 | 685,000 | 668,028 |
"PE", Series 2898, 5.0%, 5/15/2033 | 335,000 | 326,620 |
"ND", Series 2950, 5.0%, 6/15/2033 | 1,140,000 | 1,110,870 |
"PD", Series 2939, 5.0%, 7/15/2033 | 535,000 | 521,770 |
"KG", Series 2987, 5.0%, 12/15/2034 | 1,470,000 | 1,430,092 |
"PE", Series 2522, 5.5%, 3/15/2022 | 950,000 | 963,552 |
Federal National Mortgage Association: | | |
"EG", Series 2005-22, 5.0%, 11/25/2033 | 750,000 | 730,297 |
"PG", Series 2002-3, 5.5%, 2/25/2017 | 500,000 | 506,337 |
"ZQ", Series G92-9, 7.0%, 12/25/2021 | 62,328 | 62,670 |
Total Collateralized Mortgage Obligations (Cost $9,398,965) | 9,427,530 |
|
Government & Agency Obligations 17.6% |
Sovereign Bonds 2.1% |
Dominican Republic, Series REG S, 8.625%, 4/20/2027 | 100,000 | 116,000 |
Federative Republic of Brazil: | | |
7.125%, 1/20/2037 | 110,000 | 124,300 |
8.25%, 1/20/2034 | 30,000 | 37,950 |
Government of Malaysia, Series 1/04, 4.305%, 2/27/2009 MYR | 570,000 | 173,919 |
Government of Ukraine, Series REG S, 6.75%, 11/14/2017 | 390,000 | 383,175 |
Nota do Tesouro Nacional, 10.0%, 1/1/2017 BRL | 710,000 | 315,574 |
Republic of Argentina, Series X, 7.0%, 4/17/2017 | 520,000 | 404,719 |
Republic of Colombia, 7.375%, 9/18/2037 | 200,000 | 222,500 |
Republic of Egypt: | | |
Series REG S, 8.75%, 7/18/2012 EGP | 1,000,000 | 186,902 |
9.1%, 7/12/2010 EGP | 380,000 | 73,007 |
9.1%, 9/20/2012 EGP | 230,000 | 43,726 |
9.35%, 8/16/2010 EGP | 80,000 | 15,348 |
Republic of El Salvador, Series REG S, 7.65%, 6/15/2035 | 90,000 | 103,950 |
Republic of Gabon, Series REG S, 8.2%, 12/12/2017 | 100,000 | 103,500 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Republic of Ghana, Series REG S, 8.5%, 10/4/2017 | 180,000 | 188,316 |
Republic of Pakistan, Series REG S, 6.875%, 6/1/2017 | 170,000 | 151,300 |
Republic of Panama: | | |
6.7%, 1/26/2036 | 170,000 | 179,350 |
7.125%, 1/29/2026 | 220,000 | 242,000 |
7.25%, 3/15/2015 | 80,000 | 88,200 |
Republic of Peru, 8.2% 8/12/2026 PEN | 730,000 | 288,784 |
Republic of Philippines, 8.25%, 1/15/2014 | 170,000 | 190,400 |
Republic of Turkey: | | |
Series CPI, 10.0%, 2/15/2012 TRY | 290,000 | 268,745 |
16.0%, 3/7/2012 TRY | 400,000 | 339,464 |
Republic of Uruguay: | | |
7.875%, 1/15/2033 (PIK) | 50,000 | 56,000 |
8.0%, 11/18/2022 | 110,000 | 123,200 |
Republic of Venezuela: | | |
7.65%, 4/21/2025 | 120,000 | 102,600 |
9.25%, 9/15/2027 | 40,000 | 39,900 |
State of Qatar, Series REG S, 9.75%, 6/15/2030 | 50,000 | 76,690 |
Mexican Bonds: | | |
Series M-20, 8.0%, 12/7/2023 MXN | 2,000,000 | 179,673 |
Series MI-10, 9.0%, 12/20/2012 MXN | 930,000 | 88,643 |
| 4,907,835 |
US Treasury Obligations 15.5% |
US Treasury Bonds: | | |
4.75%, 2/15/2037 | 430,000 | 450,022 |
6.0%, 2/15/2026 (b) | 7,865,000 | 9,307,740 |
6.875%, 8/15/2025 (b) | 350,000 | 450,023 |
8.125%, 8/15/2019 | 1,100,000 | 1,482,766 |
US Treasury Inflation Index Note, 2.0%, 1/15/2014 | 4,925,295 | 5,087,293 |
US Treasury Notes: | | |
2.625%, 3/15/2009 (b) | 1,235,000 | 1,227,667 |
4.25%, 9/30/2012 (b) | 4,667,000 | 4,830,709 |
4.25%, 11/15/2014 (b) | 340,000 | 350,758 |
4.25%, 11/15/2017 (b) | 9,309,000 | 9,471,181 |
4.375%, 11/15/2008 (b) | 150,000 | 151,184 |
4.375%, 12/15/2010 (b) | 2,105,000 | 2,183,281 |
4.5%, 4/30/2012 | 160,000 | 167,137 |
5.125%, 6/30/2008 (b) | 350,000 | 352,898 |
| 35,512,659 |
Total Government and Agency Obligations (Cost $39,676,853) | 40,420,494 |
| Principal Amount ($)(a) | Value ($) |
| |
Municipal Bonds and Notes 1.8% |
Gainesville, FL, Post-Employment Benefits Obligation Revenue, Retiree Health Care Plan, 4.6%, 10/1/2012 (c) | 630,000 | 630,038 |
Jicarilla, NM, Sales & Special Tax Revenue, Apache Nation Revenue, 144A, 5.2%, 12/1/2013 | 670,000 | 682,221 |
Los Angeles, CA, Community Development Agency Tax Allocation Revenue, Adelante Eastside Project, Series C, 6.49%, 9/1/2037 (c) | 325,000 | 302,981 |
Trenton, NJ, Core City General Obligation, School District Revenue, 4.7%, 4/1/2013 (c) | 545,000 | 549,224 |
Virgin Islands, Port Authority Marine Revenue, Series B, 5.08%, 9/1/2013 (c) | 1,420,000 | 1,458,127 |
Washington, State Economic Development Finance Authority Revenue, CSC Tacoma LLC Project, Series A, 3.8%, 10/1/2011 (c) | 550,000 | 524,414 |
Total Municipal Bonds and Notes (Cost $4,116,014) | 4,147,005 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Preferred Stocks 0.2% |
Arch Capital Group Ltd., 8.0% | 4,202 | 104,262 |
Delphi Financial Group, Inc., 7.376% | 18,000 | 333,564 |
Ford Motor Credit Co., LLC 7.375% | 1,020 | 18,411 |
Total Preferred Stocks (Cost $578,444) | 456,237 |
|
Securities Lending Collateral 13.0% |
Daily Assets Fund Institutional, (d) (e) 5.03% (Cost $29,757,611) | 29,757,611 | 29,757,611 |
|
Cash Equivalents 2.2% |
Cash Management QP Trust, (d) 4.67% (Cost $5,018,337) | 5,018,337 | 5,018,337 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $262,371,201)+ | 113.4 | 260,137,564 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (13.4) | (30,629,313) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 229,508,251 |
* Floating rate notes are securities whose yields vary with a designated market index or market rate, such as the coupon-equivalent of the US Treasury bill rate. These securities are shown at their current rate as of December 31, 2007.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $262,412,857. At December 31, 2007, net unrealized depreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $2,275,293. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $2,383,252 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $4,658,545.(a) Principal amount stated in US dollars unless otherwise noted.(b) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2007 amounted to $28,962,463 which is 12.6% of net assets.(c) Bond is insured by one of these companies:Insurance Coverage | As a % of Total Investment Portfolio |
Financial Guaranty Insurance Co.
| 0.2 |
Financial Security Assurance, Inc.
| 0.6 |
MBIA Corp.
| 0.4 |
Radian Asset Assurance
| 0.1 |
(d) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(e) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio is net of borrower rebates.144A: Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.
PIK: Denotes that all or a portion of the income is paid in kind.
REIT: Real Estate Investment Trust
As of December 31, 2007, the Portfolio entered into the following open forward foreign currency exchange contracts:
Contracts to Deliver | | In Exchange For | | Settlement Date | Unrealized Appreciation ($) |
CAD
| 1,067,000 |
| USD
| 1,095,494 |
| 1/25/2008 | 14,020 |
CHF
| 601,000 |
| EUR
| 365,928 |
| 1/25/2008 | 3,517 |
EUR
| 186,001 |
| AUD
| 317,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 5,871 |
EUR
| 189,982 |
| CAD
| 280,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 5,903 |
EUR
| 386,228 |
| CHF
| 644,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 4,833 |
EUR
| 203,314 |
| JPY
| 33,320,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 1,718 |
EUR
| 374,751 |
| PLN
| 1,356,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 2,903 |
EUR
| 158,500 |
| USD
| 233,020 |
| 2/21/2008 | 1,125 |
GBP
| 143,563 |
| JPY
| 32,250,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 3,944 |
GBP
| 411,000 |
| USD
| 838,650 |
| 1/25/2008 | 21,119 |
JPY
| 30,890,000 |
| USD
| 282,865 |
| 1/25/2008 | 5,566 |
USD
| 1,428,792 |
| CHF
| 1,662,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 41,679 |
USD
| 20,826 |
| CHF
| 24,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 409 |
USD
| 756,564 |
| CNY
| 5,389,000 |
| 7/16/2008 | 13,346 |
USD
| 261,028 |
| EUR
| 180,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 2,265 |
USD
| 280,154 |
| EUR
| 193,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 2,156 |
USD
| 287,378 |
| JPY
| 33,120,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 9,940 |
USD
| 360,206 |
| JPY
| 41,222,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 9,844 |
USD
| 297,668 |
| RUB
| 7,467,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 6,611 |
USD
| 284,493 |
| SGD
| 414,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 3,675 |
USD
| 36,569 |
| TRY
| 45,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 1,493 |
USD
| 179,648 |
| ZAR
| 1,249,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | 2,252 |
ZAR
| 1,249,000 |
| USD
| 186,921 |
| 1/25/2008 | 5,022 |
Total unrealized appreciation/depreciation | 169,211 |
Contracts to Deliver | | In Exchange For | | Settlement Date | Unrealized Depreciation ($) |
AUD
| 322,000 |
| USD
| 282,185 |
| 1/25/2008 | (142) |
BRL
| 151,000 |
| USD
| 80,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | (4,495) |
EUR
| 371,659 |
| CHF
| 613,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | (1,284) |
EUR
| 193,658 |
| JPY
| 31,050,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | (4,535) |
EUR
| 367,547 |
| SEK
| 3,442,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | (4,931) |
EUR
| 413,000 |
| USD
| 590,229 |
| 1/25/2008 | (13,884) |
JPY
| 1,301,284 |
| NZD
| 14,822 |
| 1/25/2008 | (251) |
NZD
| 8,000 |
| JPY
| 660,373 |
| 1/25/2008 | (375) |
NZD
| 373,000 |
| USD
| 278,869 |
| 1/25/2008 | (7,298) |
NZD
| 355,000 |
| USD
| 264,771 |
| 1/25/2008 | (7,587) |
PLN
| 1,379,000 |
| EUR
| 376,175 |
| 1/25/2008 | (10,169) |
SGD
| 414,000 |
| USD
| 284,165 |
| 1/25/2008 | (4,003) |
TRY
| 469,000 |
| USD
| 377,738 |
| 1/25/2008 | (18,960) |
USD
| 592,425 |
| AUD
| 668,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | (6,729) |
USD
| 589,002 |
| CAD
| 556,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | (25,460) |
USD
| 262,246 |
| EUR
| 178,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | (1,878) |
USD
| 552,020 |
| GBP
| 266,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | (22,912) |
USD
| 83,200 |
| UAH
| 416,000 |
| 1/25/2008 | (970) |
Total unrealized appreciation/depreciation | (135,863) |
Currency Abbreviations |
AUD Australian Dollar BRL Brazilian Real CAD Canadian Dollar CHF Swiss Franc CNY Yuan Renminbi EGP Egyptian Pound EUR Euro GBP Pound Sterling JPY Japanese Yen MXN Mexican Peso MYR Malaysian Ringgit NZD New Zealand Dollar PEN Peruvian Nouveau Sol PLN Polish Zloty RUB Russian Ruble SEK Swedish Krona SGD Singapore Dollar TRY New Turkish Lira UAH Ukraine Hryvna USD United States Dollar ZAR South African Rand
|
Included in the portfolio are investments in mortgage or asset-backed securities which are interests in separate pools of mortgages or assets. Effective maturities of these investments may be shorter than stated maturities due to prepayments. Some separate investments in the Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. issues have similar coupon rates and have been aggregated for presentation purposes in the investment portfolio.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2007
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $227,595,253), including $29,962,463 of securities loaned | $ 225,361,616 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $29,757,611)* | 29,757,611 |
Investment in Cash Management QP Trust (cost $5,018,337) | 5,018,337 |
Total investments, at value (cost $262,371,201)
| 260,137,564 |
Cash
| 20,000 |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $21,616)
| 21,368 |
Receivable for investments sold
| 6,191 |
Dividends receivable
| 470 |
Interest receivable
| 2,054,591 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 224,511 |
Foreign taxes recoverable
| 7,561 |
Net receivable on closed forward foreign currency exchange contracts
| 4,100 |
Unrealized appreciation on open forward foreign currency exchange contracts
| 169,211 |
Other assets
| 5,736 |
Total assets
| 262,651,303 |
Liabilities |
Payable for investments purchased
| 2,566,651 |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 470,303 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 29,757,611 |
Unrealized depreciation on open forward foreign currency exchange contracts
| 135,863 |
Accrued management fee
| 72,753 |
Accrued distribution service fee (Class B)
| 122 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 139,749 |
Total liabilities
| 33,143,052 |
Net assets, at value | $ 229,508,251 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Undistributed net investment income
| 10,802,062 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments | (2,233,637) |
Foreign currency | 37,545 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| (1,443,857) |
Paid-in capital
| 222,346,138 |
Net assets, at value | $ 229,508,251 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($228,896,721 ÷ 32,791,859 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 6.98 |
Class B Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($611,530 ÷ 87,887 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, $.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 6.96 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2007
|
Investment Income |
Dividends
| $ 27,526 |
Interest (net of foreign taxes withheld of $8,130)
| 12,149,576 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 355,525 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 92,506 |
Total Income
| 12,625,133 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 873,517 |
Administration fee
| 223,979 |
Custodian fee
| 39,847 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 2,631 |
Services to shareholders
| 2,584 |
Record keeping fee (Class B)
| 1,278 |
Professional fees
| 59,977 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 10,912 |
Reports to shareholders
| 138,583 |
Other
| 20,534 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 1,373,842 |
Expense reductions
| (238) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 1,373,604 |
Net investment income | 11,251,529 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments
| 377,331 |
Foreign currency
| (499,125) |
| (121,794) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments
| (2,078,966) |
Foreign currency
| 100,871 |
| (1,978,095) |
Net gain (loss) | (2,099,889) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ 9,151,640 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Years Ended December 31, |
2007 | 2006 |
Operations: Net investment income
| $ 11,251,529 | $ 10,339,954 |
Net realized gain (loss)
| (121,794) | (1,437,844) |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (1,978,095) | 1,127,759 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| 9,151,640 | 10,029,869 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income:
Class A | (10,313,794) | (7,979,436) |
Class B | (83,297) | (26,938) |
Net realized gains:
Class A | — | (254,695) |
Class B | — | (953) |
Total distributions
| (10,397,091) | (8,262,022) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 38,092,545 | 35,231,866 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 10,313,794 | 8,234,131 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (36,534,184) | (35,894,600) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| 11,872,155 | 7,571,397 |
Class B Proceeds from shares sold
| 1,299,403 | 1,183,848 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 83,297 | 27,891 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (2,108,764) | (308,110) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| (726,064) | 903,629 |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | 9,900,640 | 10,242,873 |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 219,607,611 | 209,364,738 |
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $10,802,062 and $10,422,246, respectively)
| $ 229,508,251 | $ 219,607,611 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 31,026,023 | 29,892,841 |
Shares sold
| 5,515,644 | 5,142,133 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 1,510,072 | 1,234,502 |
Shares redeemed
| (5,259,880) | (5,243,453) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| 1,765,836 | 1,133,182 |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 32,791,859 | 31,026,023 |
Class B Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 198,161 | 66,058 |
Shares sold
| 183,436 | 172,869 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 12,196 | 4,182 |
Shares redeemed
| (305,906) | (44,948) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| (110,274) | 132,103 |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 87,887 | 198,161 |
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 7.03 | $ 6.99 | $ 7.13 | $ 7.04 | $ 6.98 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment incomea | .35 | .33 | .29 | .29 | .26 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (.06) | (.01) | (.10) | .08 | .09 |
Total from investment operations | .29 | .32 | .19 | .37 | .35 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.34) | (.27) | (.26) | (.28) | (.29) |
Net realized gains | — | (.01) | (.07) | — | — |
Total distributions | (.34) | (.28) | (.33) | (.28) | (.29) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 6.98 | $ 7.03 | $ 6.99 | $ 7.13 | $ 7.04 |
Total Return (%)
| 4.18 | 4.72b | 2.60 | 5.38 | 5.06 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 229 | 218 | 209 | 177 | 176 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| .61 | .66 | .68 | .60 | .58 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .61 | .62 | .68 | .60 | .58 |
Ratio of net investment income (%)
| 5.03 | 4.82 | 4.11 | 4.18 | 3.78 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)c
| 176 | 179 | 187 | 223 | 242 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c The portfolio turnover rate including mortgage dollar roll transactions was 185%, 186%, 197%, 245% and 286% for the years ended December 31, 2007, December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005, December 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively.
|
Class B Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005a |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 7.01 | $ 6.97 | $ 6.88 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment incomeb | .32 | .30 | .18 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (.06) | (.01) | (.09) |
Total from investment operations | .26 | .29 | .09 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.31) | (.24) | — |
Net realized gains | — | (.01) | — |
Total distributions | (.31) | (.25) | — |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 6.96 | $ 7.01 | $ 6.97 |
Total Return (%)
| 3.77 | 4.33c | 1.31** |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| .6 | 1 | .5 |
Ratio of expenses, before expense reductions (%)
| 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.04* |
Ratio of expenses, after expense reductions (%)
| 1.02 | .99 | 1.04* |
Ratio of net investment income (%)
| 4.62 | 4.45 | 3.86* |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)d
| 176 | 179 | 187** |
a For the period May 2, 2005 (commencement of operations of Class B shares) to December 31, 2005. b Based on average shares outstanding during the period. c Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. d The portfolio turnover rate including mortgage dollar roll transactions was 185% and 186% for the years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 and 197% for the period ended December 31, 2005, respectively. * Annualized ** Not annualized
|
Performance Summary December 31, 2007
DWS Growth & Income VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratios, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2007 are 0.54% and 0.90% for Class A and Class B shares, respectively. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2007.
Portfolio returns during all periods shown reflect a fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement. Without this waiver/reimbursement, returns would have been lower.
Risk Considerations
The Portfolio is subject to stock market risk, meaning stocks in the Portfolio may decline in value for extended periods of time due to the activities and financial prospects of individual companies, or due to general market and economic conditions. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific information regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS Growth & Income VIP — Class A [] Russell 1000 ® Index+ [] S&P 500® Index | The Russell 1000® Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 92% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index. The Standard & Poor's® 500 (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e319d/e319d76f42b1b58fcbf73064c2771f302684a108" alt="svs1_g10k670" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS Growth & Income VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $10,136 | $12,216 | $17,055 | $12,911 |
Average annual total return
| 1.36% | 6.90% | 11.27% | 2.59% |
Russell 1000 Index+
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,577 | $12,978 | $18,780 | $18,243 |
Average annual total return
| 5.77% | 9.08% | 13.43% | 6.20% |
S&P 500 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,549 | $12,816 | $18,286 | $17,756 |
Average annual total return
| 5.49% | 8.62% | 12.83% | 5.91% |
DWS Growth & Income VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class B | Growth of $10,000
| $10,100 | $12,097 | $16,805 | $12,544 |
Average annual total return
| 1.00% | 6.55% | 10.94% | 2.29% |
Russell 1000 Index+
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,577 | $12,978 | $18,780 | $18,243 |
Average annual total return
| 5.77% | 9.08% | 13.43% | 6.20% |
S&P 500 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,549 | $12,816 | $18,286 | $17,756 |
Average annual total return
| 5.49% | 8.62% | 12.83% | 5.91% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
+ On January 23, 2007, The Russell 1000 Index replaced the S&P 500 as the Portfolio's benchmark index because the Advisor believes that it more accurately reflects the Portfolio's investment strategy.Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS Growth & Income VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In the most recent six-month period, the Portfolio limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2007 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 980.10 | | $ 978.20 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 2.70 | | $ 4.44 | |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 1,022.48 | | $ 1,020.72 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 2.75 | | $ 4.53 | |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 365.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A | | Class B | |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS Growth & Income VIP
| .54% | | .89% | |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
Management Summary December 31, 2007
DWS Growth & Income VIP
Except for a period of weakness in late February and early March, equity markets were quite strong during the first half of 2007. By the end of May, most indices were at or near their all-time highs, and positive trends continued through mid-July before drifting lower in the late summer. A rally in September was sparked in part by the first of the US Federal Reserve Board's (the Fed's) three interest rate reductions. Volatility increased in the fourth quarter, as markets responded to further bad news about the potential impact of the subprime mortgage crisis. For the full year, the Russell 3000® Index, which is generally regarded as a good indicator of the broad stock market, returned 5.14%. Growth stocks, as measured by the Russell 1000® Growth index, performed significantly better than value stocks, as measured by the Russell 1000® Value index. With a return of 1.36% (Class A shares, unadjusted for contract charges), the portfolio underperformed its benchmark, the Russell 1000® Index, which posted a return of 5.77%.
There has been a change in management for this Portfolio since the 2006 annual report. Beginning in January 2007, a new team assumed responsibility for management of the Portfolio, using a quantitative model focused on stock selection. Because of this transition, Portfolio turnover was somewhat higher than usual during the year, as holdings were adjusted to conform to the model. Since sector weights of this Portfolio are normally maintained quite close to those of the Russell 1000 Index, most differences in return between the Portfolio and the index result from stock selection. During 2007, stock selection in the banks and materials sectors contributed to performance relative to the Russell 1000 Index. Positions in the technology hardware & equipment, transportation and consumer durables and apparel sectors detracted from performance.
In the banks sector, the Portfolio's performance benefited from not owning many of the worst-performing stocks, particularly those with significant involvement in mortgage lending. In materials, holdings that were especially strong were Southern Copper Corp.*, which is benefiting from strong world demand, and Lyondell Chemical Company*, which has significant involvement in energy.
In information technology, a significant detractor was a position in printer manufacturer Lexmark International Inc. In the transportation sector, performance was hurt by positions in several airlines including AMR Corp. and Continental Airlines, Inc. Concern about consumer spending led to poor performance of many stocks in the consumer durables & apparel sector; positions that detracted from performance include home builders NVR Inc. and Centex Corp.* and apparel/accessories marketers Polo Ralph Lauren Corp. and Coach, Inc.*
Robert Wang Jin Chen, CFA
Julie Abbett
Portfolio Managers
Risk Considerations
The Portfolio is subject to stock market risk, meaning stocks in the Portfolio may decline in value for extended periods of time due to the activities and financial prospects of individual companies, or due to general market and economic conditions. Derivatives may be more volatile and less liquid than traditional securities, and the Portfolio could suffer losses on an underlying Portfolio's derivative position. Investing in securities of emerging markets presents certain unique risks not associated with domestic investments, such as currency fluctuation, political and economic changes and market risks. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific information regarding its investments and risk profile.
The Russell 3000 Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest U.S. companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable US equity market.
The Russell 1000 Growth Index is an unmanaged, capitalization- weighted index containing those securities in the Russell 1000 Index with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000 Value Index is an unmanaged index that consists of those stocks in the Russell 1000 Index with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000 Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of the 1,000 largest companies in the Russell 3000 Index, which represents approximately 92% of the total market capitalization of the Russell 3000 Index.
Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
* As of December 31, 2007, the positions were not held.Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2007, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Portfolio Summary
DWS Growth & Income VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio Excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Common Stocks | 97% | 99% |
Cash Equivalents | 3% | — |
Exchange Traded Funds | — | 1% |
| 100% | 100% |
Sector Diversification (As a % of Common Stocks) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Information Technology | 15% | 15% |
Financials | 15% | 22% |
Health Care | 14% | 12% |
Energy | 14% | 10% |
Industrials | 13% | 12% |
Consumer Discretionary | 11% | 10% |
Consumer Staples | 9% | 9% |
Telecommunication Services | 4% | 4% |
Materials | 3% | 3% |
Utilities | 2% | 3% |
| 100% | 100% |
Asset allocation and sector diversification are subject to change.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 40. Information concerning portfolio holdings of the Portfolio as of month-end will be posted to www.dws-scudder.com on or after the last day of the following month. In addition, the Portfolio's top ten holdings and other information about the Portfolio is posted on www.dws-scudder.com as of the calendar quarter-end on or after the 15th day following quarter-end.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2007
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Common Stocks 96.7% |
Consumer Discretionary 10.5% |
Auto Components 0.9% |
American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. | 1,600 | 29,792 |
Autoliv, Inc. | 9,200 | 484,932 |
Johnson Controls, Inc. | 22,200 | 800,088 |
Lear Corp.* | 17,400 | 481,284 |
| 1,796,096 |
Hotels Restaurants & Leisure 2.1% |
Darden Restaurants, Inc. | 16,700 | 462,757 |
McDonald's Corp. | 42,900 | 2,527,239 |
Yum! Brands, Inc. | 35,900 | 1,373,893 |
| 4,363,889 |
Household Durables 0.5% |
NVR, Inc.* | 2,000 | 1,048,000 |
Leisure Equipment & Products 0.2% |
Hasbro, Inc. | 14,600 | 373,468 |
Polaris Industries, Inc. (a) | 2,800 | 133,756 |
| 507,224 |
Media 2.0% |
Comcast Corp. "A"* | 38,300 | 699,358 |
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. | 14,530 | 636,559 |
The DIRECTV Group, Inc.* | 124,100 | 2,869,192 |
| 4,205,109 |
Multiline Retail 1.3% |
Big Lots, Inc.* | 58,000 | 927,420 |
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.* | 28,100 | 728,352 |
Family Dollar Stores, Inc. | 56,200 | 1,080,726 |
| 2,736,498 |
Specialty Retail 2.8% |
AutoZone, Inc.* | 16,200 | 1,942,542 |
Best Buy Co., Inc. | 2,600 | 136,890 |
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.* | 41,000 | 1,138,160 |
RadioShack Corp. | 77,400 | 1,304,964 |
The Men's Wearhouse, Inc. | 5,600 | 151,088 |
The Sherwin-Williams Co. | 11,300 | 655,852 |
TJX Companies, Inc. | 17,700 | 508,521 |
| 5,838,017 |
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods 0.7% |
Polo Ralph Lauren Corp. | 25,400 | 1,569,466 |
Consumer Staples 8.9% |
Beverages 2.5% |
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. | 12,400 | 649,016 |
Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc. | 45,300 | 1,179,159 |
Diageo PLC (ADR) | 700 | 60,081 |
Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc. | 16,900 | 666,874 |
PepsiCo, Inc. | 35,500 | 2,694,450 |
| 5,249,580 |
Food & Staples Retailing 2.0% |
Costco Wholesale Corp. | 19,500 | 1,360,320 |
Kroger Co. | 84,700 | 2,262,337 |
SUPERVALU, Inc. | 1,900 | 71,288 |
Sysco Corp. | 17,100 | 533,691 |
| 4,227,636 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Food Products 0.3% |
Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc.* | 6,000 | 201,480 |
Kellogg Co. | 2,200 | 115,346 |
The J.M. Smucker Co. | 1,200 | 61,728 |
Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co. | 3,300 | 193,215 |
| 571,769 |
Household Products 2.1% |
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 36,100 | 2,814,356 |
Kimberly-Clark Corp. | 14,900 | 1,033,166 |
Procter & Gamble Co. | 7,000 | 513,940 |
| 4,361,462 |
Personal Products 0.1% |
Herbalife Ltd. | 6,600 | 265,848 |
Tobacco 1.9% |
Altria Group, Inc. | 33,720 | 2,548,558 |
Loews Corp. - Carolina Group | 18,200 | 1,552,460 |
| 4,101,018 |
Energy 13.1% |
Energy Equipment & Services 4.7% |
ENSCO International, Inc. | 24,600 | 1,466,652 |
Global Industries Ltd.* | 39,100 | 837,522 |
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. | 4,200 | 168,294 |
National-Oilwell Varco, Inc.* | 1,300 | 95,498 |
Noble Corp. | 44,000 | 2,486,440 |
Schlumberger Ltd. | 4,700 | 462,339 |
Tidewater, Inc. | 5,800 | 318,188 |
Transocean, Inc.* | 28,611 | 4,095,664 |
| 9,930,597 |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 8.4% |
Chevron Corp. | 50,600 | 4,722,498 |
Exxon Mobil Corp. | 23,039 | 2,158,524 |
Frontier Oil Corp. | 29,700 | 1,205,226 |
Hess Corp. | 27,100 | 2,733,306 |
Petroleo Brasileiro SA (ADR) (Preferred) | 21,900 | 2,107,218 |
Royal Dutch Shell PLC "A" (ADR) | 26,000 | 2,189,200 |
Sunoco, Inc. | 3,300 | 239,052 |
Tesoro Corp. | 39,600 | 1,888,920 |
Western Refining, Inc. | 6,000 | 145,260 |
Williams Companies, Inc. | 6,900 | 246,882 |
| 17,636,086 |
Financials 14.6% |
Capital Markets 4.2% |
Lazard Ltd. "A" | 1,600 | 65,088 |
Morgan Stanley | 76,035 | 4,038,219 |
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 21,865 | 4,702,068 |
| 8,805,375 |
Commercial Banks 0.6% |
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. | 14,900 | 978,185 |
US Bancorp. | 8,900 | 282,486 |
| 1,260,671 |
Diversified Financial Services 3.7% |
Bank of America Corp. | 72,670 | 2,998,364 |
Citigroup, Inc. | 74,100 | 2,181,504 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 61,100 | 2,667,015 |
| 7,846,883 |
Insurance 5.6% |
ACE Ltd. | 26,100 | 1,612,458 |
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. "B"* | 300 | 1,420,800 |
China Life Insurance Co., Ltd. "H" (ADR) | 7,900 | 604,350 |
Endurance Specialty Holdings Ltd. | 2,600 | 108,498 |
Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. | 17,900 | 1,560,701 |
MetLife, Inc. | 49,950 | 3,077,919 |
PartnerRe Ltd. | 2,900 | 239,337 |
The Travelers Companies, Inc. | 10,800 | 581,040 |
W.R. Berkley Corp. | 9,400 | 280,214 |
XL Capital Ltd. "A" | 45,800 | 2,304,198 |
| 11,789,515 |
Real Estate Investment Trusts 0.3% |
ProLogis (REIT) | 7,600 | 481,688 |
Vornado Realty Trust (REIT) | 1,400 | 123,130 |
| 604,818 |
Real Estate Management & Development 0.2% |
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. | 4,700 | 334,452 |
Health Care 13.8% |
Biotechnology 2.0% |
Amgen, Inc.* | 19,100 | 887,004 |
Gilead Sciences, Inc.* | 70,500 | 3,243,705 |
Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 3,200 | 177,984 |
| 4,308,693 |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies 1.2% |
Baxter International, Inc. | 7,600 | 441,180 |
Becton, Dickinson & Co. | 14,200 | 1,186,836 |
Kinetic Concepts, Inc.* | 16,100 | 862,316 |
| 2,490,332 |
Health Care Providers & Services 5.2% |
Aetna, Inc. | 55,700 | 3,215,561 |
Coventry Health Care, Inc.* | 15,600 | 924,300 |
Health Net, Inc.* | 25,900 | 1,250,970 |
Humana, Inc.* | 37,800 | 2,846,718 |
McKesson Corp. | 7,000 | 458,570 |
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.* | 22,600 | 2,291,640 |
| 10,987,759 |
Life Sciences Tools & Services 0.6% |
Invitrogen Corp.* | 12,700 | 1,186,307 |
Pharmaceuticals 4.8% |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 119,700 | 3,174,444 |
Eli Lilly & Co. | 21,400 | 1,142,546 |
Endo Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc.* | 9,600 | 256,032 |
Merck & Co., Inc. | 27,400 | 1,592,214 |
Pfizer, Inc. | 25,900 | 588,707 |
Schering-Plough Corp. | 81,000 | 2,157,840 |
Sepracor, Inc.* | 46,600 | 1,223,250 |
| 10,135,033 |
Industrials 12.4% |
Aerospace & Defense 6.2% |
Boeing Co. | 43,540 | 3,808,009 |
General Dynamics Corp. | 5,300 | 471,647 |
Goodrich Corp. | 4,300 | 303,623 |
Honeywell International, Inc. | 59,920 | 3,689,274 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Lockheed Martin Corp. | 34,800 | 3,663,048 |
Northrop Grumman Corp. | 13,000 | 1,022,320 |
| 12,957,921 |
Airlines 1.4% |
AMR Corp.* | 98,500 | 1,381,955 |
Continental Airlines, Inc. "B"* | 51,700 | 1,150,325 |
Delta Air Lines, Inc.* | 13,400 | 199,526 |
US Airways Group, Inc.* | 21,600 | 317,736 |
| 3,049,542 |
Commercial Services & Supplies 0.3% |
Allied Waste Industries, Inc.* | 40,300 | 444,106 |
Dun & Bradstreet Corp. | 2,500 | 221,575 |
The Brink's Co. | 1,200 | 71,688 |
| 737,369 |
Construction & Engineering 1.3% |
Fluor Corp. | 15,800 | 2,302,376 |
Shaw Group, Inc.* | 5,800 | 350,552 |
| 2,652,928 |
Electrical Equipment 0.3% |
Belden, Inc. | 5,800 | 258,100 |
Emerson Electric Co. | 8,000 | 453,280 |
| 711,380 |
Industrial Conglomerates 0.8% |
General Electric Co. | 43,050 | 1,595,863 |
Teleflex, Inc. | 1,800 | 113,418 |
| 1,709,281 |
Machinery 1.6% |
AGCO Corp.* | 7,100 | 482,658 |
Caterpillar, Inc. | 19,400 | 1,407,664 |
PACCAR, Inc. | 20,700 | 1,127,736 |
Parker Hannifin Corp. | 5,000 | 376,550 |
| 3,394,608 |
Road & Rail 0.5% |
Ryder System, Inc. | 20,500 | 963,705 |
Information Technology 15.0% |
Communications Equipment 0.6% |
Cisco Systems, Inc.* | 5,930 | 160,525 |
Nokia Oyj (ADR) | 27,700 | 1,063,403 |
| 1,223,928 |
Computers & Peripherals 4.8% |
Apple, Inc.* | 16,900 | 3,347,552 |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 22,200 | 1,120,656 |
International Business Machines Corp. | 45,200 | 4,886,120 |
Lexmark International, Inc. "A"* | 19,600 | 683,256 |
QLogic Corp.* | 5,700 | 80,940 |
| 10,118,524 |
Electronic Equipment & Instruments 0.8% |
Arrow Electronics, Inc.* | 7,100 | 278,888 |
AU Optronics Corp. (ADR) (a) | 42,200 | 810,240 |
Avnet, Inc.* | 10,100 | 353,197 |
LG.Philips LCD Co., Ltd. (ADR)* | 8,500 | 220,830 |
| 1,663,155 |
Internet Software & Services 1.2% |
eBay, Inc.* | 17,570 | 583,148 |
Google, Inc. "A"* | 2,820 | 1,949,974 |
| 2,533,122 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
IT Services 2.2% |
Accenture Ltd. "A" | 85,000 | 3,062,550 |
Computer Sciences Corp.* | 24,600 | 1,216,962 |
MasterCard, Inc. "A" | 1,700 | 365,840 |
| 4,645,352 |
Office Electronics 0.1% |
Canon, Inc. (ADR) | 2,600 | 119,158 |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment 1.9% |
Amkor Technology, Inc.* | 16,700 | 142,451 |
Applied Materials, Inc. | 122,000 | 2,166,720 |
MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.* | 18,500 | 1,637,065 |
Teradyne, Inc.* | 2,800 | 28,952 |
| 3,975,188 |
Software 3.4% |
Compuware Corp.* | 6,200 | 55,056 |
Microsoft Corp. | 183,175 | 6,521,030 |
Symantec Corp.* | 35,930 | 579,910 |
| 7,155,996 |
Materials 2.7% |
Chemicals 2.4% |
Celanese Corp. "A" | 25,100 | 1,062,232 |
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. | 13,900 | 1,529,834 |
Eastman Chemical Co. | 6,500 | 397,085 |
Terra Industries, Inc.* | 41,800 | 1,996,368 |
| 4,985,519 |
Containers & Packaging 0.2% |
Packaging Corp. of America | 12,300 | 346,860 |
Metals & Mining 0.1% |
Allegheny Technologies, Inc. | 3,000 | 259,200 |
Telecommunication Services 4.1% |
Diversified Telecommunication Services 4.0% |
AT&T, Inc. | 31,980 | 1,329,089 |
CenturyTel, Inc. | 14,600 | 605,316 |
Embarq Corp. | 32,600 | 1,614,678 |
Telus Corp. | 1,300 | 65,122 |
Verizon Communications, Inc. | 97,400 | 4,255,407 |
Windstream Corp. | 44,700 | 581,994 |
| 8,451,606 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Wireless Telecommunication Services 0.1% |
Telephone & Data Systems, Inc. | 3,100 | 194,060 |
Utilities 1.6% |
Electric Utilities 0.6% |
American Electric Power Co., Inc. | 7,800 | 363,168 |
Edison International | 9,900 | 528,363 |
FirstEnergy Corp. | 4,800 | 347,232 |
| 1,238,763 |
Gas Utilities 0.0% |
Energen Corp. | 1,000 | 64,230 |
Independent Power Producers & Energy Traders 0.2% |
Constellation Energy Group | 4,200 | 430,626 |
Multi-Utilities 0.8% |
Sempra Energy | 26,100 | 1,615,067 |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $192,469,273) | 203,355,221 |
| Principal Amount ($) | Value ($) |
| |
Government & Agency Obligations 0.3% |
US Treasury Bill, 3.7%**, 1/17/2008 (b) (Cost $599,341) | 600,000 | 599,341 |
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Securities Lending Collateral 0.2% |
Daily Assets Fund Institutional, 5.03%(c) (d) (Cost $353,640) | 353,640 | 353,640 |
|
Cash Equivalents 3.0% |
Cash Management QP Trust, 4.67%(c) (Cost $6,276,381) | 6,276,381 | 6,276,381 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $199,698,635)+ | 100.2 | 210,584,583 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (0.2) | (436,272) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 210,148,311 |
* Non-income producing security.** Annualized yield at time of purchase; not a coupon rate.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $202,012,439. At December 31, 2007, net unrealized appreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $8,572,144. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $20,467,497 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $11,895,353.(a) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2007 amounted to $345,048 which is 0.2% of net assets.(b) At December 31, 2007, this security has been pledged, in whole or in part, to cover initial margin requirements for open futures contracts.(c) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(d) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio is net of borrower rebates.ADR: American Depositary Receipt
REIT: Real Estate Investment Trust
At December 31, 2007, open futures contracts purchased were as follows:
Futures | Expiration Date | Contracts | Aggregated Face Value ($) | Value ($) | Unrealized Depreciation ($) |
S&P 500 Index
| 3/19/2008 | 18 | 6,666,956 | 6,647,400 | (19,556) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2007
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $193,068,614), including $345,048 of securities loaned | $ 203,954,562 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $353,640)* | 353,640 |
Investment in Cash Management QP Trust (cost $6,276,381) | 6,276,381 |
Total investments, at value (cost $199,698,635)
| 210,584,583 |
Dividends receivable
| 201,405 |
Interest receivable
| 22,540 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 28,822 |
Foreign taxes recoverable
| 514 |
Due from Advisor
| 12,349 |
Other assets
| 6,072 |
Total assets
| 210,856,285 |
Liabilities |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 132,303 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 353,640 |
Payable for daily variation margin on open futures contracts
| 37,350 |
Accrued management fee
| 75,074 |
Accrued distribution service fee (Class B)
| 2,836 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 106,771 |
Total liabilities
| 707,974 |
Net assets, at value | $ 210,148,311 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Undistributed net investment income
| 3,269,183 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments | 10,885,948 |
Futures | (19,556) |
Foreign currency | 12 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| 26,732,198 |
Paid-in capital
| 169,280,526 |
Net assets, at value | $ 210,148,311 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($195,545,721 ÷ 18,082,818 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 10.81 |
Class B Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($14,602,590 ÷ 1,355,326 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 10.77 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2007
|
Investment Income |
Income: Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $22,418)
| $ 4,592,340 |
Interest
| 25,658 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 331,676 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 30,040 |
Total Income
| 4,979,714 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 1,103,548 |
Administration fee
| 285,358 |
Custodian fee
| 37,245 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 69,685 |
Services to shareholders
| 1,548 |
Record keeping fee (Class B)
| 31,287 |
Professional fees
| 54,538 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 12,186 |
Reports to shareholders
| 121,005 |
Other
| 17,648 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 1,734,048 |
Expense reductions
| (35,497) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 1,698,551 |
Net investment income (loss) | 3,281,163 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments
| 38,153,711 |
Futures
| 533,221 |
Foreign currency
| 2,927 |
| 38,689,859 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments
| (35,720,119) |
Futures
| (19,556) |
Foreign currency
| 185 |
| (35,739,490) |
Net gain (loss) | 2,950,369 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ 6,231,532 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Years Ended December 31, |
2007 | 2006 |
Operations: Net investment income (loss)
| $ 3,281,163 | $ 3,845,235 |
Net realized gain (loss)
| 38,689,859 | 24,911,633 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (35,739,490) | 12,505,619 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| 6,231,532 | 41,262,487 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income:
Class A | (3,254,218) | (2,664,327) |
Class B | (431,057) | (286,921) |
Net realized gains:
Class A | (3,589,531) | — |
Class B | (675,883) | — |
Total distributions
| $ (7,950,689) | $ (2,951,248) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 7,943,494 | 14,579,038 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 6,843,749 | 2,664,327 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (96,721,167) | (64,690,476) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| (81,933,924) | (47,447,111) |
Class B Proceeds from shares sold
| 1,756,094 | 8,202,285 |
Net assets acquired in tax-free reorganization
| — | 5,500,068 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 1,106,940 | 286,921 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (40,893,714) | (14,614,169) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| (38,030,680) | (624,895) |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | (121,683,761) | (9,760,767) |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 331,832,072 | 341,592,839 |
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $3,269,183 and $3,670,368, respectively)
| $ 210,148,311 | $ 331,832,072 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 25,561,711 | 30,277,518 |
Shares sold
| 724,126 | 1,462,864 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 621,594 | 265,107 |
Shares redeemed
| (8,824,613) | (6,443,778) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| (7,478,893) | (4,715,807) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 18,082,818 | 25,561,711 |
Class B Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 4,788,468 | 4,883,742 |
Shares sold
| 161,143 | 780,726 |
Shares issued in tax-free reorganization
| — | 509,730 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 100,722 | 28,606 |
Shares redeemed
| (3,695,007) | (1,414,336) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| (3,433,142) | (95,274) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 1,355,326 | 4,788,468 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 10.94 | $ 9.72 | $ 9.29 | $ 8.50 | $ 6.77 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .13 | .13c | .10 | .12 | .07 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | .02 | 1.19 | .45 | .74 | 1.74 |
Total from investment operations | .15 | 1.32 | .55 | .86 | 1.81 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.13) | (.10) | (.12) | (.07) | (.08) |
Net realized gains | (.15) | — | — | — | — |
Total distributions | (.28) | (.10) | (.12) | (.07) | (.08) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 10.81 | $ 10.94 | $ 9.72 | $ 9.29 | $ 8.50 |
Total Return (%)
| 1.36b | 13.63b,c | 6.07b | 10.16 | 26.74 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 196 | 280 | 294 | 172 | 161 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| .57 | .56 | .57 | .56 | .59 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .56 | .54 | .54 | .56 | .59 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| 1.18 | 1.24c | 1.10 | 1.37 | .91 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 310 | 105 | 115 | 33 | 37 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Scudder Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.007 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.07%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.06% lower.
|
Class B Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 10.90 | $ 9.68 | $ 9.25 | $ 8.47 | $ 6.75 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .09 | .09c | .07 | .09 | .05 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | .02 | 1.19 | .45 | .73 | 1.73 |
Total from investment operations | .11 | 1.28 | .52 | .82 | 1.78 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.09) | (.06) | (.09) | (.04) | (.06) |
Net realized gains | (.15) | — | — | — | — |
Total distributions | (.24) | (.06) | (.09) | (.04) | (.06) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 10.77 | $ 10.90 | $ 9.68 | $ 9.25 | $ 8.47 |
Total Return (%)
| 1.00b | 13.28b,c | 5.73b | 9.78 | 26.55 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 15 | 52 | 47 | 33 | 18 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| .95 | .94 | .95 | .89 | .85 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .92 | .89 | .89 | .89 | .85 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| .82 | .89c | .75 | 1.04 | .65 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 310 | 105 | 115 | 33 | 37 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Scudder Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.007 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.07%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.06% lower.
|
Performance Summary December 31, 2007
DWS Capital Growth VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratios, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2007 are 0.50% and 0.82% for Class A and Class B shares, respectively. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2007.
Portfolio returns during all periods shown reflect a fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement. Without this waiver/reimbursement, returns would have been lower.
Risk Considerations
The Portfolio is subject to stock market risk, meaning stocks in the Portfolio may decline in value for extended periods of time due to the activities and financial prospects of individual companies, or due to general market and economic conditions. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific information regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS Capital Growth VIP — Class A [] Russell 1000® Growth Index [] S&P 500® Index | The Russell 1000® Growth Index is an unmanaged, capitalization- weighted index containing those securities in the Russell 1000 Index with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The Standard & Poor's 500® (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e935/8e9350f19572697af1030a381d5717666f28b298" alt="svs1_g10k660" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS Capital Growth VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $11,259 | $13,314 | $18,242 | $15,642 |
Average annual total return
| 12.59% | 10.01% | 12.78% | 4.58% |
Russell 1000 Growth Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $11,181 | $12,838 | $17,706 | $14,559 |
Average annual total return
| 11.81% | 8.68% | 12.11% | 3.83% |
S&P 500 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,549 | $12,816 | $18,286 | $17,756 |
Average annual total return
| 5.49% | 8.62% | 12.83% | 5.91% |
DWS Capital Growth VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class B | Growth of $10,000
| $11,218 | $13,167 | $17,917 | $15,154 |
Average annual total return
| 12.18% | 9.61% | 12.37% | 4.24% |
Russell 1000 Growth Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $11,181 | $12,838 | $17,706 | $14,559 |
Average annual total return
| 11.81% | 8.68% | 12.11% | 3.83% |
S&P 500 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,549 | $12,816 | $18,286 | $17,756 |
Average annual total return
| 5.49% | 8.62% | 12.83% | 5.91% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS Capital Growth VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In the most recent six-month period, the Portfolio limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2007 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 1,053.70 | | $ 1,051.80 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 2.54 | | $ 4.24 | |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 1,022.74 | | $ 1,021.07 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 2.50 | | $ 4.18 | |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 365.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A | | Class B | |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS Capital Growth VIP
| .49% | | .82% | |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
Management Summary December 31, 2007
DWS Capital Growth VIP
Except for a period of weakness in late February and early March, equity markets were quite strong during the first half of 2007. By the end of May, most indices were at or near their all-time highs, and positive trends continued through mid-July before drifting lower in the late summer. A rally in September was sparked in part by the first of the US Federal Reserve Board's (the Fed's) three interest rate reductions. Volatility increased in the fourth quarter, as markets responded to further bad news about the potential impact of the sub-prime mortgage crisis.
For the full year, the Russell 3000® Index, which is generally regarded as a good indicator of the broad stock market, returned 5.14%. Growth stocks, as measured by the Russell 1000® Growth index, performed significantly better than value stocks, as measured by the Russell 1000® Value index.
With a return of 12.59% (Class A shares, unadjusted for contract charges), the Portfolio outperformed its benchmarks, the Russell 1000 Growth Index, which posted a return of 11.81%, and the Standard & Poor's 500® Index, which returned 5.49%. The Portfolio's performance relative to the Russell 1000 Growth Index was helped by both sector allocation decisions and stock selection.
Positioning within the energy sector was the largest contributor to performance during the period as the Portfolio's significant overweight to the sector continued to be rewarded.1 Energy holdings that performed especially well include Schlumberger Ltd. and Transocean, Inc.
Stock selection in the information technology sector also contributed to performance. The strongest returns came from those firms with innovative new products or dominant/growing market share positions. Examples of this strength included portfolio holdings Apple, Inc. and Google, Inc.
Security selection within the consumer discretionary and health care sectors detracted from performance. In the consumer discretionary sector, shares of several retailers dropped, as investors demonstrated concern about consumer spending. In health care, performance was hurt by drops in positions including Celgene Corp. and Genentech, Inc. However, several health care holdings, including Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Baxter International, Inc. were up strongly.
Julie M. Van Cleave, CFA Jack A. Zehner
Lead Portfolio Manager Richard Shepley
Portfolio Managers
Risk Considerations
The Portfolio is subject to stock market risk, meaning stocks in the Portfolio may decline in value for extended periods of time due to the activities and financial prospects of individual companies, or due to general market and economic conditions. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific information regarding its investments and risk profile.
1 "Overweight" means the portfolio holds a higher weighting in a given sector or security than the benchmark. "Underweight" means the portfolio holds a lower weighting.The Russell 3000 Index measures the performance of the 3,000 largest US companies based on total market capitalization, which represents approximately 98% of the investable US equity market.
The Russell 1000 Growth Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index containing those securities in the Russell 1000 Index with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values.
The Russell 1000 Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values.
The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.
Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2007, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Portfolio Summary
DWS Capital Growth VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Common Stocks | 98% | 98% |
Cash Equivalents | 2% | 2% |
| 100% | 100% |
Sector Diversification (As a % of Common Stocks) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Information Technology | 24% | 22% |
Health Care | 18% | 19% |
Energy | 14% | 15% |
Consumer Staples | 11% | 14% |
Industrials | 11% | 9% |
Consumer Discretionary | 10% | 12% |
Financials | 5% | 8% |
Materials | 4% | 1% |
Telecommunication Services | 2% | — |
Utilities | 1% | — |
| 100% | 100% |
Asset allocation and sector diversification are subject to change.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 53. Information concerning portfolio holdings of the Portfolio as of month-end will be posted to www.dws-scudder.com on or after the last day of the following month. In addition, the Portfolio's top ten holdings and other information about the Portfolio is posted on www.dws-scudder.com as of the calendar quarter-end on or after the 15th day following quarter-end.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2007
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Common Stocks 97.8% |
Consumer Discretionary 10.0% |
Automobiles 0.6% |
Harley-Davidson, Inc. | 145,300 | 6,786,963 |
Hotels Restaurants & Leisure 1.7% |
McDonald's Corp. | 307,900 | 18,138,389 |
Household Durables 0.3% |
Fortune Brands, Inc. | 52,300 | 3,784,428 |
Media 1.4% |
McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. | 165,600 | 7,254,936 |
Omnicom Group, Inc. | 171,280 | 8,140,938 |
| 15,395,874 |
Multiline Retail 2.4% |
Kohl's Corp.* | 214,300 | 9,814,940 |
Target Corp. | 314,700 | 15,735,000 |
| 25,549,940 |
Specialty Retail 2.9% |
Best Buy Co., Inc. | 85,700 | 4,512,105 |
GameStop Corp. "A"* | 186,000 | 11,552,460 |
Staples, Inc. | 320,065 | 7,383,900 |
Tiffany & Co. | 158,300 | 7,286,549 |
| 30,735,014 |
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods 0.7% |
Coach, Inc.* | 239,300 | 7,317,794 |
Consumer Staples 11.2% |
Beverages 4.0% |
Diageo PLC | 586,843 | 12,616,235 |
PepsiCo, Inc. | 404,725 | 30,718,627 |
| 43,334,862 |
Food & Staples Retailing 1.5% |
Shoppers Drug Mart Corp. | 121,900 | 6,578,240 |
Walgreen Co. (a) | 251,200 | 9,565,696 |
| 16,143,936 |
Food Products 3.0% |
Dean Foods Co. | 401,518 | 10,383,255 |
Groupe Danone | 127,483 | 11,444,135 |
Kellogg Co. | 188,000 | 9,856,840 |
| 31,684,230 |
Household Products 2.7% |
Colgate-Palmolive Co. | 133,240 | 10,387,390 |
Procter & Gamble Co. | 256,770 | 18,852,054 |
| 29,239,444 |
Energy 14.1% |
Energy Equipment & Services 6.4% |
Baker Hughes, Inc. | 225,700 | 18,304,270 |
Noble Corp. | 214,500 | 12,121,395 |
Schlumberger Ltd. | 291,200 | 28,645,344 |
Transocean, Inc.* | 66,027 | 9,451,765 |
| 68,522,774 |
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 7.7% |
ConocoPhillips | 145,760 | 12,870,608 |
Devon Energy Corp. | 232,600 | 20,680,466 |
EOG Resources, Inc. | 218,025 | 19,458,731 |
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Valero Energy Corp. | 136,345 | 9,548,241 |
XTO Energy, Inc. | 398,583 | 20,471,197 |
| 83,029,243 |
Financials 5.1% |
Capital Markets 2.5% |
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. | 202,800 | 13,271,232 |
State Street Corp. | 170,570 | 13,850,284 |
| 27,121,516 |
Diversified Financial Services 1.3% |
CME Group, Inc. | 20,937 | 14,362,782 |
Insurance 1.3% |
Aflac, Inc. | 217,524 | 13,623,528 |
Health Care 17.2% |
Biotechnology 4.4% |
Celgene Corp.* | 170,100 | 7,860,321 |
Genentech, Inc.* | 240,850 | 16,153,810 |
Gilead Sciences, Inc.* | 497,720 | 22,900,097 |
| 46,914,228 |
Health Care Equipment & Supplies 5.4% |
Baxter International, Inc. | 333,300 | 19,348,065 |
C.R. Bard, Inc. | 111,900 | 10,608,120 |
Hologic, Inc.* | 45,500 | 3,123,120 |
Medtronic, Inc. | 300,800 | 15,121,216 |
Zimmer Holdings, Inc.* | 157,340 | 10,408,041 |
| 58,608,562 |
Health Care Providers & Services 2.1% |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings* | 103,900 | 7,847,567 |
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 245,885 | 14,310,507 |
| 22,158,074 |
Life Sciences Tools & Services 1.0% |
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.* | 191,500 | 11,045,720 |
Pharmaceuticals 4.3% |
Abbott Laboratories | 218,900 | 12,291,235 |
Eli Lilly & Co. | 107,000 | 5,712,730 |
Johnson & Johnson | 423,366 | 28,238,512 |
| 46,242,477 |
Industrials 10.7% |
Aerospace & Defense 4.3% |
Goodrich Corp. | 150,800 | 10,647,988 |
Honeywell International, Inc. | 283,500 | 17,455,095 |
United Technologies Corp. | 231,800 | 17,741,972 |
| 45,845,055 |
Electrical Equipment 2.4% |
Emerson Electric Co. | 465,900 | 26,397,894 |
Industrial Conglomerates 1.5% |
General Electric Co. | 424,865 | 15,749,746 |
Machinery 1.6% |
Caterpillar, Inc. | 76,900 | 5,579,864 |
Parker Hannifin Corp. | 161,800 | 12,185,158 |
| 17,765,022 |
Road & Rail 0.9% |
Canadian National Railway Co. | 213,400 | 10,014,862 |
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Information Technology 23.2% |
Communications Equipment 2.8% |
Cisco Systems, Inc.* | 647,220 | 17,520,245 |
QUALCOMM, Inc. | 319,400 | 12,568,390 |
| 30,088,635 |
Computers & Peripherals 7.6% |
Apple, Inc.* | 130,635 | 25,876,181 |
Dell, Inc.* | 187,800 | 4,602,978 |
EMC Corp.* | 772,515 | 14,314,703 |
Hewlett-Packard Co. | 392,900 | 19,833,592 |
International Business Machines Corp. | 156,000 | 16,863,600 |
| 81,491,054 |
Electronic Equipment & Instruments 1.0% |
Mettler-Toledo International, Inc.* | 93,000 | 10,583,400 |
Internet Software & Services 1.4% |
Google, Inc. "A"* | 20,725 | 14,330,923 |
IT Services 2.8% |
Accenture Ltd. "A" | 375,700 | 13,536,471 |
Fiserv, Inc.* | 159,200 | 8,834,008 |
Paychex, Inc. | 221,300 | 8,015,486 |
| 30,385,965 |
Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment 2.6% |
Broadcom Corp. "A"* | 180,900 | 4,728,726 |
Intel Corp. | 884,090 | 23,569,839 |
| 28,298,565 |
Software 5.0% |
Adobe Systems, Inc.* | 311,175 | 13,296,508 |
Electronic Arts, Inc.* (a) | 171,000 | 9,988,110 |
Microsoft Corp. | 678,180 | 24,143,208 |
VMware, Inc. "A"* (a) | 79,100 | 6,722,709 |
| 54,150,535 |
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Materials 4.3% |
Chemicals |
Ecolab, Inc. | 229,500 | 11,752,695 |
Monsanto Co. | 179,100 | 20,003,679 |
Praxair, Inc. | 169,300 | 15,018,603 |
| 46,774,977 |
Telecommunication Services 1.5% |
Diversified Telecommunication Services 1.0% |
AT&T, Inc. | 253,800 | 10,547,928 |
Wireless Telecommunication Services 0.5% |
American Tower Corp. "A"* | 125,000 | 5,325,000 |
Utilities 0.5% |
Electric Utilities |
Allegheny Energy, Inc. | 92,800 | 5,903,008 |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $684,008,971) | 1,053,392,347 |
|
Securities Lending Collateral 1.5% |
Daily Assets Fund Institutional, 5.03% (b) (c) (Cost $16,387,277) | 16,387,277 | 16,387,277 |
|
Cash Equivalents 2.2% |
Cash Management QP Trust, 4.67% (b) (Cost $23,617,585) | 23,617,585 | 23,617,585 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $724,013,833)+ | 101.5 | 1,093,397,209 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (1.5) | (16,421,694) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 1,076,975,515 |
* Non-income producing security.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $729,166,719. At December 31, 2007, net unrealized appreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $364,230,490. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $382,631,543 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $18,401,053.(a) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2007 amounted to $16,099,712 which is 1.5% of net assets.(b) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(c) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio is net of borrower rebates.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2007
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $684,008,971), including $16,099,712 of securities loaned | $ 1,053,392,347 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $16,387,277)* | 16,387,277 |
Investment in Cash Management QP Trust (cost $23,617,585) | 23,617,585 |
Total investments, at value (cost $724,013,833)
| 1,093,397,209 |
Cash
| 26,462 |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $38)
| 38 |
Dividends receivable
| 708,122 |
Interest receivable
| 130,388 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 213,912 |
Foreign taxes recoverable
| 61,616 |
Due from Advisor
| 16,348 |
Other assets
| 25,104 |
Total assets
| 1,094,579,199 |
Liabilities |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 626,816 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 16,387,277 |
Accrued management fee
| 307,675 |
Accrued distribution service fee (Class B)
| 3,321 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 278,595 |
Total liabilities
| 17,603,684 |
Net assets, at value | $ 1,076,975,515 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Undistributed net investment income
| 9,689,216 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments | 369,383,376 |
Foreign currency | 3,448 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| (282,377,151) |
Paid-in capital
| 980,276,626 |
Net assets, at value | $ 1,076,975,515 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($1,058,268,944 ÷ 51,857,448 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 20.41 |
Class B Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($18,706,571 ÷ 920,834 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 20.31 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2007
|
Investment Income |
Income: Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $96,147)
| $ 14,923,179 |
Interest
| 1,099 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 825,442 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 116,121 |
Total Income
| 15,865,841 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 4,224,782 |
Administration fee
| 1,150,671 |
Custodian fee
| 86,687 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 121,808 |
Services to shareholders
| 3,087 |
Record keeping fee (Class B)
| 63,378 |
Professional fees
| 60,240 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 39,685 |
Reports to shareholders
| 496,976 |
Other
| 37,121 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 6,284,435 |
Expense reductions
| (131,407) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 6,153,028 |
Net investment income (loss) | 9,712,813 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments
| 108,280,041 |
Foreign currency
| (9,088) |
| 108,270,953 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments
| 19,838,081 |
Foreign currency
| 3,543 |
| 19,841,624 |
Net gain (loss) | 128,112,577 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ 137,825,390 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Years Ended December 31, |
2007 | 2006 |
Operations: Net investment income (loss)
| $ 9,712,813 | $ 7,388,043 |
Net realized gain (loss)
| 108,270,953 | 15,481,308 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| 19,841,624 | 58,267,822 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| 137,825,390 | 81,137,173 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income:
Class A | (6,887,657) | (5,636,032) |
Class B | (258,683) | (141,341) |
Total distributions
| (7,146,340) | (5,777,373) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 22,292,590 | 16,358,245 |
Net assets acquired in tax-free reorganization
| — | 210,765,818 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 6,887,657 | 5,636,032 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (225,450,131) | (203,567,867) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| (196,269,884) | 29,192,228 |
Class B Proceeds from shares sold
| 1,548,433 | 43,601,768 |
Net assets acquired in tax-free reorganization
| — | 37,158,118 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 258,683 | 141,341 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (97,598,529) | (51,781,199) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| (95,791,413) | 29,120,028 |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | (161,382,247) | 133,672,056 |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 1,238,357,762 | 1,104,685,706 |
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $9,689,216 and $7,131,831, respectively)
| $ 1,076,975,515 | $ 1,238,357,762 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 62,005,444 | 61,042,375 |
Shares sold
| 1,165,102 | 949,778 |
Shares issued in tax-free reorganization
| — | 11,523,100 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of dividends
| 362,508 | 322,982 |
Shares redeemed
| (11,675,606) | (11,832,791) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| (10,147,996) | 963,069 |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 51,857,448 | 62,005,444 |
Class B Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 5,921,673 | 4,353,863 |
Shares sold
| 80,681 | 2,415,727 |
Shares issued in tax-free reorganization
| — | 2,040,472 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of dividends
| 13,644 | 8,123 |
Shares redeemed
| (5,095,164) | (2,896,512) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| (5,000,839) | 1,567,810 |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 920,834 | 5,921,673 |
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $18.24 | $ 16.90 | $ 15.67 | $ 14.59 | $ 11.54 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .17d | .13c | .10 | .14 | .08 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 2.12 | 1.31 | 1.29 | 1.02 | 3.03 |
Total from investment operations | 2.29 | 1.44 | 1.39 | 1.16 | 3.11 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.12) | (.10) | (.16) | (.08) | (.06) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 20.41 | $ 18.24 | $ 16.90 | $ 15.67 | $ 14.59 |
Total Return (%)
| 12.59b | 8.53b,c | 8.96b | 7.99 | 26.89 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 1,058 | 1,131 | 1,031 | 698 | 705 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| .53 | .52 | .50 | .50 | .51 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .52 | .49 | .49 | .50 | .51 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| .86d | .73c | .61 | .98 | .61 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 30 | 16 | 17 | 15 | 13 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Scudder Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.007 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.04%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.03% lower. d Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.03 per share and 0.17% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Class B Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 18.15 | $ 16.81 | $ 15.59 | $ 14.52 | $ 11.49 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .09d | .06c | .04 | .09 | .03 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 2.12 | 1.31 | 1.28 | 1.01 | 3.02 |
Total from investment operations | 2.21 | 1.37 | 1.32 | 1.10 | 3.05 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.05) | (.03) | (.10) | (.03) | (.02) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 20.31 | $ 18.15 | $ 16.81 | $ 15.59 | $ 14.52 |
Total Return (%)
| 12.18b | 8.17b,c | 8.51b | 7.56 | 26.51 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 19 | 107 | 73 | 23 | 15 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| .94 | .91 | .89 | .88 | .87 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| .90 | .86 | .86 | .88 | .87 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| .48d | .36c | .24 | .60 | .25 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 30 | 16 | 17 | 15 | 13 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Scudder Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.007 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.04%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.03% lower. d Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.03 per share and 0.17% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Performance Summary December 31, 2007
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratios, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2007 are 1.12% and 1.51% for Class A and Class B shares, respectively. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2007.
Portfolio returns during all periods shown reflect a fee waiver and/or reimbursement. Without this waiver/reimbursement, returns would have been lower.
Risk Considerations
This Portfolio is subject to stock market risk. Investing in foreign securities presents certain unique risks not associated with domestic investments, such as currency fluctuations, political and economic changes and market risks. Additionally, stocks of small-sized companies involve greater risk as they often have limited product lines, markets, or financial resources and may be sensitive to erratic and abrupt market movements more so than securities of larger, more-established companies. All of these factors may result in greater share price volatility. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS Global Opportunities VIP — Class A [] S&P®/Citigroup Extended Market Index-World | The S&P®/Citigroup Extended Market Index-World, is an unmanaged index of small-capitalization stocks within 26 countries around the globe. Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends net of withholding tax and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e96ff/e96ffb00358d056862bfdf7d5f415aad2b8bb0b8" alt="svs1_g10k650" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $10,933 | $15,774 | $29,008 | $32,061 |
Average annual total return
| 9.33% | 16.41% | 23.74% | 12.36% |
S&P/Citigroup Extended Market Index-World
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,605 | $14,982 | $27,286 | $28,183 |
Average annual total return
| 6.05% | 14.42% | 22.23% | 10.92% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class B | Growth of $10,000
| $10,892 | $15,673 | $28,706 | $31,338 |
Average annual total return
| 8.92% | 16.16% | 23.48% | 12.10% |
S&P/Citigroup Extended Market Index-World
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,605 | $14,982 | $27,286 | $28,183 |
Average annual total return
| 6.05% | 14.42% | 22.23% | 10.92% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In the most recent six-month period, the Portfolio limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2007 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 1,002.70 | | $ 1,000.60 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 5.20 | | $ 6.86 | |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 1,020.01 | | $ 1,018.25 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 5.24 | | $ 6.92 | |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 365.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A | | Class B | |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 1.03% | | 1.36% | |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
Management Summary December 31, 2007
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
DWS Global Opportunities VIP's Class A shares (unadjusted for contract charges) provided a total return of 9.33% during 2007, outperforming the 6.05% return of the S&P/Citigroup Extended Market Index — World. The portfolio has outpaced both the benchmark and its Lipper peer group average (the Lipper Global Growth category) over the three-, five- and ten-year periods.
Performance benefited from our strong stock selection in the two worst-performing sectors of the market: consumer discretionary and financials. In the former, we gained a boost from positions in Paddy Power PLC and JC Decaux SA. In financials, our holdings in Midland Holdings Ltd., Hellenic Exchanges Holding SA, and Piraeus Bank SA all made substantial gains even as most stocks in the sector were losing ground. Information technology also was a source of strength for the Portfolio. Our positioning was least effective in materials, where a below-benchmark weighting in the sector weighed on returns; and in health care, where Flamel Technologies SA and Sigma Pharmaceuticals Ltd. were notable detractors.
While we believe the uncertainty surrounding the global financial sector warrants a degree of caution, we retain a positive outlook for equities based on supportive central bank policies, strong economic growth in the emerging markets, robust corporate balance sheets, and valuations. We therefore believe the global equity markets will continue to offer a wealth of opportunities for those, like us, who emphasize bottom-up stock selection. We believe the broad nature of the Portfolio's investment universe will enable us to take full advantage of these opportunities in the months and years ahead.
Joseph Axtell, CFA Terrence S. Gray, CFA
Lead Portfolio Manager Portfolio Manager
Risk Considerations
This Portfolio is subject to stock market risk. Investing in foreign securities presents certain unique risks not associated with domestic investments, such as currency fluctuations, political and economic changes and market risks. Additionally, stocks of small-sized companies involve greater risk as they often have limited product lines, markets or financial resources and may be sensitive to erratic and abrupt market movements more so than securities of larger, more established companies. Derivatives may be more volatile and less liquid than traditional securities, and the Portfolio could suffer losses on an underlying Portfolio's derivative position. Investing in securities of emerging markets presents certain unique risks not associated with domestic investments, such as currency fluctuation, political and economic changes and market risks. All of these factors may result in greater share price volatility. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
The S&P/Citigroup Extended Market Index — World is an unmanaged index of small-capitalization stocks within 26 countries around the globe.
Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends net of withholding tax and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
The Lipper Global Growth category consists of Portfolios that invest at least 75% of their assets in companies both inside and outside the US with market capitalizations less than the 500th company in the S&P Citigroup World Broad Market Index. Category returns assume reinvestment of dividends. It is not possible to invest directly into a Lipper category.
Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2007, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Portfolio Summary
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Common Stocks | 98% | 97% |
Cash Equivalents | 2% | 3% |
| 100% | 100% |
Geographical Diversification (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Cash Equivalents and Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Continental Europe | 38% | 41% |
United States | 31% | 32% |
Pacific Basin | 10% | 7% |
United Kingdom | 9% | 7% |
Japan | 6% | 7% |
Australia | 2% | 3% |
Canada | 2% | 1% |
Latin America | 1% | 2% |
Other | 1% | — |
| 100% | 100% |
Sector Diversification (As a % of Common Stocks) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Financials | 21% | 27% |
Information Technology | 18% | 15% |
Industrials | 16% | 12% |
Health Care | 16% | 17% |
Energy | 10% | 8% |
Consumer Discretionary | 10% | 13% |
Utilities | 4% | 3% |
Consumer Staples | 3% | 2% |
Materials | 1% | 2% |
Telecommunication Services | 1% | 1% |
| 100% | 100% |
Asset allocation, geographical diversification and sector diversification are subject to change.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 64. Information concerning portfolio holdings of the Portfolio as of month-end will be posted to www.dws-scudder.com on or after the last day of the following month. In addition, the Portfolio's top ten holdings and other information about the Portfolio is posted on www.dws-scudder.com as of the calendar quarter-end on or after the 15th day following quarter-end.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2007
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Common Stocks 97.7% |
Australia 2.2% |
Babcock & Brown Ltd. | 197,948 | 4,669,002 |
Sigma Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (a) | 1,701,438 | 2,373,701 |
(Cost $6,014,805) | 7,042,703 |
Bahrain 0.9% |
Gulf Finance House EC (GDR), 144A* (Cost $2,369,925) | 94,797 | 2,843,910 |
Belgium 0.6% |
Hansen Transmissions International NV* (Cost $1,130,986) | 318,905 | 1,828,260 |
Bermuda 0.5% |
Orient-Express Hotels Ltd. "A" (Cost $903,221) | 29,300 | 1,685,336 |
Brazil 1.3% |
Aracruz Celulose SA "B" (ADR) (Preferred) | 22,100 | 1,643,135 |
Diagnosticos da America SA | 130,800 | 2,684,871 |
(Cost $3,362,867) | 4,328,006 |
Canada 1.9% |
Certicom Corp.* | 301,900 | 483,309 |
Flint Energy Services Ltd.* | 42,000 | 769,401 |
OPTI Canada, Inc.* | 78,800 | 1,325,376 |
SunOpta, Inc.* | 258,000 | 3,444,300 |
(Cost $6,537,290) | 6,022,386 |
China 0.3% |
VanceInfo Technologies, Inc. (ADR)* (Cost $938,400) | 110,400 | 993,600 |
France 3.0% |
Financiere Marc de Lacharriere SA (a) | 24,922 | 1,701,123 |
Flamel Technologies SA (ADR)* (a) | 203,100 | 2,026,938 |
Haulotte Group | 41,465 | 1,231,031 |
JC Decaux SA | 98,757 | 3,869,448 |
Seche Environnement | 4,791 | 929,210 |
(Cost $9,592,854) | 9,757,750 |
Germany 13.2% |
Compugroup Holding AG* | 39,450 | 728,269 |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. | 174,407 | 9,329,117 |
Grenkeleasing AG (a) | 40,817 | 1,361,521 |
Hypo Real Estate Holding AG (a) | 51,140 | 2,660,496 |
M.A.X. Automation AG | 333,329 | 2,834,807 |
Puma AG | 3,767 | 1,497,090 |
QSC AG* (a) | 263,312 | 1,107,874 |
Rational AG (a) | 12,384 | 2,533,582 |
SGL Carbon AG* | 28,800 | 1,548,426 |
Software AG | 25,069 | 2,201,068 |
Stada Arzneimittel AG | 106,634 | 6,508,462 |
United Internet AG (Registered) | 278,443 | 6,712,062 |
Wincor Nixdorf AG | 37,934 | 3,574,843 |
(Cost $20,102,498) | 42,597,617 |
Greece 5.5% |
Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Co. SA | 111,000 | 4,788,682 |
Hellenic Exchanges Holding SA | 101,100 | 3,542,531 |
Piraeus Bank SA | 208,275 | 8,113,019 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Titan Cement Co. SA | 26,600 | 1,209,126 |
(Cost $6,170,611) | 17,653,358 |
Hong Kong 5.3% |
China New Town Development Co., Ltd.* | 259,000 | 106,159 |
Dah Chong Hong Holdings Ltd.* | 265,000 | 118,128 |
K Wah International Holdings Ltd. | 3,138,000 | 1,985,486 |
Kingboard Chemical Holdings Ltd. | 936,240 | 5,471,416 |
Midland Holdings Ltd. | 2,529,557 | 3,947,847 |
Wing Hang Bank Ltd. | 371,500 | 5,531,270 |
(Cost $5,894,570) | 17,160,306 |
Ireland 5.7% |
Anglo Irish Bank Corp. PLC | 281,388 | 4,460,233 |
C&C Group PLC (b) | 157,608 | 952,700 |
C&C Group PLC (b) | 5,663 | 33,841 |
FBD Holdings PLC | 44,100 | 1,627,077 |
ICON PLC (ADR)* | 60,700 | 3,754,902 |
Kingspan Group PLC | 106,776 | 1,609,229 |
Paddy Power PLC | 111,176 | 3,657,429 |
Ryanair Holdings PLC* (b) | 2,200 | 14,757 |
Ryanair Holdings PLC* (b) | 320,632 | 2,159,207 |
(Cost $9,646,548) | 18,269,375 |
Italy 0.7% |
Lottomatica SpA (a) | 39,601 | 1,436,146 |
Safilo Group SpA (a) | 298,900 | 993,108 |
(Cost $3,262,692) | 2,429,254 |
Japan 5.4% |
AEON Credit Services Co., Ltd. | 90,800 | 1,342,338 |
AEON Mall Co., Ltd. | 141,000 | 3,701,115 |
ANEST IWATA Corp. (a) | 60,000 | 248,629 |
JAFCO Co., Ltd. | 21,900 | 717,363 |
KITZ Corp. (a) | 170,000 | 865,028 |
Matsui Securities Co., Ltd. (a) | 162,900 | 1,283,928 |
Mitsubishi UFJ Lease & Finance Co., Ltd. | 40,710 | 1,355,486 |
Nidec Corp. | 21,700 | 1,610,948 |
Park24 Co., Ltd. (a) | 215,000 | 1,655,695 |
Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd. | 184,000 | 4,525,726 |
(Cost $14,249,659) | 17,306,256 |
Korea 0.9% |
Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., Ltd. (Cost $810,406) | 55,400 | 3,050,299 |
Netherlands 5.7% |
Arcadis NV | 23,735 | 1,637,482 |
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. NV (New York Shares) | 117,900 | 7,125,876 |
QIAGEN NV* (a) | 186,900 | 4,013,954 |
SBM Offshore NV | 180,283 | 5,654,924 |
(Cost $9,254,913) | 18,432,236 |
Norway 0.8% |
Electromagnetic GeoServices AS* (a) | 33,250 | 311,156 |
Prosafe ASA (a) | 126,563 | 2,182,051 |
(Cost $1,949,746) | 2,493,207 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Spain 0.5% |
Tecnicas Reunidas SA (Cost $1,481,684) | 23,819 | 1,510,017 |
Sweden 0.9% |
Brostrom AB "B" (a) | 144,100 | 1,100,719 |
Eniro AB | 142,934 | 1,277,374 |
Micronic Laser Systems AB* (a) | 124,200 | 614,245 |
(Cost $3,287,918) | 2,992,338 |
Switzerland 1.0% |
Advanced Digital Broadcast Holdings SA (ADB Group) (Registered)* | 16,968 | 477,931 |
Fortune Management, Inc. (REG S)* (a) | 322,568 | 184,104 |
Partners Group (Registered) | 18,500 | 2,464,662 |
(Cost $2,881,879) | 3,126,697 |
Taiwan 2.2% |
Powerchip Semiconductor Corp. | 2,728,139 | 1,153,217 |
Siliconware Precision Industries Co. | 2,398,778 | 4,269,159 |
Yuanta Financial Holding Co., Ltd.* | 2,813,415 | 1,818,571 |
(Cost $3,958,906) | 7,240,947 |
Thailand 0.6% |
Bangkok Bank PCL (Foreign Registered) (Cost $1,282,718) | 515,100 | 1,820,880 |
United Kingdom 8.9% |
Aegis Group PLC | 487,166 | 1,126,449 |
ARM Holdings PLC | 1,282,844 | 3,144,895 |
Ashmore Group PLC | 607,215 | 3,222,281 |
BlueBay Asset Management PLC (Unit) | 270,441 | 1,897,320 |
Dicom Group PLC | 428,171 | 1,486,639 |
John Wood Group PLC | 244,680 | 2,101,247 |
Lamprell PLC | 418,584 | 3,573,517 |
Michael Page International PLC | 417,695 | 2,377,966 |
Serco Group PLC | 561,624 | 5,133,833 |
Taylor Nelson Sofres PLC | 457,309 | 1,873,936 |
Xchanging Ltd.* | 474,056 | 2,630,281 |
(Cost $22,954,159) | 28,568,364 |
United States 29.7% |
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. | 60,550 | 2,300,295 |
Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.* | 61,700 | 1,513,501 |
Aecom Technology Corp.* | 85,968 | 2,456,106 |
Aeropostale, Inc.* | 106,400 | 2,819,600 |
Akamai Technologies, Inc.* | 71,000 | 2,456,600 |
Allegheny Energy, Inc. | 174,200 | 11,080,862 |
AMERIGROUP Corp.* | 86,300 | 3,145,635 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Carter's, Inc.* | 86,800 | 1,679,580 |
Celgene Corp.* | 46,100 | 2,130,281 |
Cogent, Inc.* | 99,200 | 1,106,080 |
Diamond Foods, Inc. | 61,500 | 1,317,945 |
Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.* | 87,800 | 3,428,590 |
EMS Technologies, Inc.* | 51,600 | 1,560,384 |
Euronet Worldwide, Inc.* (a) | 88,400 | 2,652,000 |
Foundation Coal Holdings, Inc. | 57,500 | 3,018,750 |
FTI Consulting, Inc.* | 88,650 | 5,464,386 |
Gentex Corp. | 78,600 | 1,396,722 |
Harman International Industries, Inc. | 28,700 | 2,115,477 |
Invitrogen Corp.* | 24,500 | 2,288,545 |
Itron, Inc.* (a) | 55,100 | 5,287,947 |
Joy Global, Inc. | 81,775 | 5,382,430 |
Lam Research Corp.* | 28,100 | 1,214,763 |
Metabolix, Inc.* | 45,100 | 1,073,380 |
Mueller Water Products, Inc. "A" (a) | 87,300 | 831,096 |
NeuStar, Inc. "A"* | 65,400 | 1,875,672 |
NxStage Medical, Inc.* (a) | 190,400 | 2,888,368 |
Owens & Minor, Inc. | 62,900 | 2,668,847 |
Perficient, Inc.* | 82,300 | 1,295,402 |
Phillips-Van Heusen Corp. | 31,900 | 1,175,834 |
Rowan Companies, Inc. | 46,900 | 1,850,674 |
Schawk, Inc. | 87,100 | 1,351,792 |
Somanetics Corp.* | 96,600 | 2,284,590 |
Thoratec Corp.* (a) | 117,800 | 2,142,782 |
THQ, Inc.* | 134,400 | 3,788,736 |
Ultra Petroleum Corp.* | 96,500 | 6,899,750 |
(Cost $59,406,091) | 95,943,402 |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $197,445,346) | 315,096,504 |
|
Securities Lending Collateral 10.0% |
Daily Assets Fund Institutional, 5.03% (c) (d) (Cost $32,318,519) | 32,318,519 | 32,318,519 |
|
Cash Equivalents 2.1% |
Cash Management QP Trust, 4.67% (c) (Cost $6,854,864) | 6,854,864 | 6,854,864 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $236,618,729)+ | 109.8 | 354,269,887 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (9.8) | (31,773,123) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 322,496,764 |
* Non-income producing security.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $242,614,224. At December 31, 2007, net unrealized appreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $111,655,663. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $138,465,710 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $26,810,047.(a) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2007 amounted to $30,562,485 which is 9.5% of net assets.(b) Securities with the same description are the same corporate entity but trade on different stock exchanges.(c) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(d) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio is net of borrower rebates.144A: Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.
ADR: American Depositary Receipt
GDR: Global Depositary Receipt
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2007
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $197,445,346), including $30,562,485 of securities loaned | $ 315,096,504 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $32,318,519)* | 32,318,519 |
Investment in Cash Management QP Trust (cost $6,854,864) | 6,854,864 |
Total investments, at value (cost $236,618,729)
| 354,269,887 |
Cash
| 24 |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $952,317)
| 967,068 |
Dividends receivable
| 179,009 |
Interest receivable
| 61,994 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 16,096 |
Foreign taxes recoverable
| 29,354 |
Other assets
| 7,890 |
Total assets
| 355,531,322 |
Liabilities |
Payable for investments purchased
| 131,193 |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 193,460 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 32,318,519 |
Accrued management fee
| 222,598 |
Accrued distribution service fee (Class B)
| 2,539 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 166,249 |
Total liabilities
| 33,034,558 |
Net assets, at value | $ 322,496,764 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income
| (4,870,687) |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments | 117,651,158 |
Foreign currency | 17,645 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| 39,779,834 |
Paid-in capital
| 169,918,814 |
Net assets, at value | $ 322,496,764 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($310,350,488 ÷ 16,980,253 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 18.28 |
Class B Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($12,146,276 ÷ 673,793 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 18.03 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2007
|
Investment Income |
Income: Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $355,569)
| $ 4,721,008 |
Interest
| 3,912 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 374,579 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 454,747 |
Total Income
| 5,554,246 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 3,148,776 |
Administration fee
| 353,795 |
Custodian fee
| 217,318 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 53,186 |
Services to shareholders
| 1,868 |
Record keeping fee (Class B)
| 22,754 |
Professional fees
| 69,239 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 13,307 |
Reports to shareholders
| 195,657 |
Other
| 41,032 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 4,116,932 |
Expense reductions
| (86,361) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 4,030,571 |
Net investment income (loss) | 1,523,675 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments
| 41,727,866 |
Foreign currency (including CPMF tax of $55)
| (13,330) |
| 41,714,536 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments
| (9,554,056) |
Foreign currency
| 15,531 |
| (9,538,525) |
Net gain (loss) | 32,176,011 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ 33,699,686 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Years Ended December 31, |
2007 | 2006 |
Operations: Net investment income (loss)
| $ 1,523,675 | $ 491,309 |
Net realized gain (loss)
| 41,714,536 | 39,905,008 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (9,538,525) | 26,807,487 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| 33,699,686 | 67,203,804 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income:
Class A | (4,162,201) | (3,088,293) |
Class B | (385,143) | (323,635) |
Net realized gains:
Class A | (23,747,876) | — |
Class B | (2,659,501) | — |
Total distributions
| (30,954,721) | (3,411,928) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 25,551,412 | 29,442,382 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 27,910,077 | 3,088,293 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (76,124,259) | (44,115,725) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| (22,662,770) | (11,585,050) |
Class B Proceeds from shares sold
| 2,661,166 | 3,685,449 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 3,044,644 | 323,635 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (30,666,540) | (7,059,014) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| (24,960,730) | (3,049,930) |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | (44,878,535) | 49,156,896 |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 367,375,299 | 318,218,403 |
Net assets at end of period (including accumulated distributions in excess of net investment income of $4,870,687 and $3,290,411, respectively)
| $ 322,496,764 | $ 367,375,299 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 18,234,839 | 19,013,655 |
Shares sold
| 1,377,801 | 1,785,621 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 1,512,741 | 181,664 |
Shares redeemed
| (4,145,128) | (2,746,101) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| (1,254,586) | (778,816) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 16,980,253 | 18,234,839 |
Class B Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 2,034,192 | 2,223,191 |
Shares sold
| 144,813 | 227,819 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 167,013 | 19,241 |
Shares redeemed
| (1,672,225) | (436,059) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| (1,360,399) | (188,999) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 673,793 | 2,034,192 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 18.15 | $ 15.00 | $ 12.77 | $ 10.38 | $ 6.97 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .08d | .03c | .04 | .01 | .02 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 1.61 | 3.28 | 2.27 | 2.41 | 3.40 |
Total from investment operations | 1.69 | 3.31 | 2.31 | 2.42 | 3.42 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.23) | (.16) | (.08) | (.03) | (.01) |
Net realized gains | (1.33) | — | — | — | — |
Total distributions | (1.56) | (.16) | (.08) | (.03) | (.01) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 18.28 | $ 18.15 | $ 15.00 | $ 12.77 | $ 10.38 |
Total Return (%)
| 9.33b | 22.08c | 18.19 | 23.35 | 49.09 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 310 | 331 | 285 | 232 | 183 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| 1.14 | 1.12 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.18 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| 1.12 | 1.12 | 1.17 | 1.18 | 1.18 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| .45d | .16c | .32 | .09 | .28 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 19 | 28 | 30 | 24 | 41 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Scudder Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.002 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.01%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.01% lower. d Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.02 per share and 0.09% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Class B Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 17.93 | $ 14.84 | $ 12.62 | $ 10.25 | $ 6.89 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .01e | (.00)b,d | .03 | (.01) | .00b |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 1.61 | 3.24 | 2.24 | 2.38 | 3.36 |
Total from investment operations | 1.62 | 3.24 | 2.27 | 2.37 | 3.36 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.19) | (.15) | (.05) | — | — |
Net realized gains | (1.33) | — | — | — | — |
Total distributions | (1.52) | (.15) | (.05) | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 18.03 | $ 17.93 | $ 14.84 | $ 12.62 | $ 10.25 |
Total Return (%)
| 8.92c | 21.88c,d | 18.06c | 23.12c | 48.77 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 12 | 37 | 33 | 24 | 13 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| 1.53 | 1.51 | 1.54 | 1.52 | 1.43 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| 1.50 | 1.31 | 1.24 | 1.39 | 1.43 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| .07e | (.03)d | .25 | (.12) | .03 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 19 | 28 | 30 | 24 | 41 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Amount is less than $.005. c Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. d Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Scudder Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.002 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.01%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.01% lower. e Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.02 per share and 0.09% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Performance Summary December 31, 2007
DWS International VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratios, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2007 are 0.96% and 1.36% for Class A and Class B shares, respectively. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2007.
Returns for all periods shown for Class B shares reflect a fee waiver and/or reimbursement. Without this waiver/reimbursement, returns would have been lower.
Risk Considerations
This Portfolio is subject to stock market risk. Investing in foreign securities presents certain unique risks not associated with domestic investments, such as currency fluctuation, political and economic changes, and market risks. This may result in greater share price volatility. Derivatives may be more volatile and less liquid than traditional securities, and the Portfolio could suffer losses on an underlying Portfolio's derivative position. Investing in securities of emerging markets presents certain unique risks not associated with domestic investments, such as currency fluctuation, political and economic changes and market risks. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS International VIP — Class A [] MSCI EAFE® Index | The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) Europe, Australasia and Far East (EAFE®) Index is an unmanaged index that tracks international stock performance in the 21 developed markets in Europe, Australasia and the Far East. The index is calculated using closing local market prices and translates into US dollars using the London close foreign exchange rates. Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends net of withholding tax and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d825/6d825ddac5ef60508f8edaded67faf5497dfe8d2" alt="svs1_g10k640" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS International VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $11,459 | $16,760 | $24,951 | $20,187 |
Average annual total return
| 14.59% | 18.78% | 20.07% | 7.28% |
MSCI EAFE® Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $11,117 | $15,946 | $26,574 | $22,947 |
Average annual total return
| 11.17% | 16.83% | 21.59% | 8.66% |
DWS International VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year |
Class B | Growth of $10,000
| $11,425 | $16,584 | $24,582 | $19,709 |
Average annual total return
| 14.25% | 18.37% | 19.71% | 7.02% |
MSCI EAFE® Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $11,117 | $15,946 | $26,574 | $22,947 |
Average annual total return
| 11.17% | 16.83% | 21.59% | 8.66% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS International VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. In the most recent six-month period, Class B shares of the Portfolio limited these expenses; had it not done so, expenses would have been higher. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2007 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 1,040.20 | | $ 1,038.10 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 4.83 | | $ 6.63 | |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 1,020.47 | | $ 1,018.70 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 4.79 | | $ 6.56 | |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 365.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A | | Class B | |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS International VIP
| 0.94% | | 1.29% | |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
Management Summary December 31, 2007
DWS International VIP
International equities performed well during 2007, as measured by the 11.17% US dollar return of the Portfolio's benchmark, MSCI EAFE® Index. The Class A shares of the Portfolio gained 14.59% (unadjusted for contract charges), outperforming the benchmark.
The Portfolio was well-positioned for the environment of the past year via overweights in Europe and the emerging markets, both of which outperformed, along with a large underweight in Japan, the worst performer among all major global markets.1 Top individual performers included AMEC PLC, the UK-based construction and engineering company; Gazprom, the Russian energy concern; and three German stocks: Bayer AG, Porsche AG, and E.ON AG. Also aiding performance was a position in China Mobile Ltd., which has benefited from rapidly increasing wireless penetration in China. All of the Portfolio's notable detractors were financial stocks: UniCredito Italiano SpA and Banca Italease*, both based in Italy, and several Japanese banks.
We expect 2008 to be a challenging year characterized by slower growth in the world's developed economies. We therefore intend to focus on companies with strong franchises, distinct competitive advantages, and the ability to perform well in any economic environment. We are finding many such companies in the emerging markets, where local growth trends remain strong. Russia, the Middle East, and Africa are areas in which we have been adding in recent months. At the same time, we have reduced the Portfolio's weighting in Europe and have elected not to raise its weighting in Japan. From a broader standpoint, we will continue to use fundamental research to identify opportunities in individual stocks that have been artificially depressed by short-term market volatility.
Matthias Knerr, CFA
Manager
Risk Considerations
This Portfolio is subject to stock market risk. Investing in foreign securities presents certain unique risks not associated with domestic investments, such as currency fluctuation, political and economic changes, and market risks. This may result in greater share price volatility. Derivatives may be more volatile and less liquid than traditional securities, and the Portfolio could suffer losses on an underlying Portfolio's derivative position. Investing in securities of emerging markets presents certain unique risks not associated with domestic investments, such as currency fluctuation, political and economic changes and market risks. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
1 "Overweight" means the portfolio holds a higher weighting in a given sector or security than the benchmark. "Underweight" means the portfolio holds a lower weighting.The Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) Europe, Australasia and Far East (EAFE®) Index is an unmanaged index that tracks international stock performance in the 21 developed markets in Europe, Australasia and the Far East. The index is calculated using closing local market prices and translates into US dollars using the London close foreign exchange rates.
Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends net of withholding tax and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
* As of December 31, 2007, the positions were not held.Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2007, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Portfolio Summary
DWS International VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Common Stocks | 98% | 96% |
Preferred Stocks | 2% | 1% |
Cash Equivalents | — | 3% |
| 100% | 100% |
Geographical Diversification (As a % of Common and Preferred Stocks) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Continental Europe | 53% | 55% |
United Kingdom | 15% | 18% |
Japan | 14% | 17% |
Pacific Basin | 7% | 4% |
Australia | 3% | 1% |
Middle East | 3% | — |
Latin America | 3% | 5% |
Other | 2% | — |
| 100% | 100% |
Sector Diversification (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Financials | 22% | 33% |
Industrials | 17% | 6% |
Consumer Discretionary | 14% | 16% |
Materials | 10% | 8% |
Telecommunication Services | 9% | 6% |
Consumer Staples | 7% | 6% |
Health Care | 6% | 9% |
Energy | 5% | 6% |
Utilities | 5% | 3% |
Information Technology | 5% | 7% |
| 100% | 100% |
Asset allocation, geographical diversification and sector diversification are subject to change.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 76. Information concerning portfolio holdings of the Portfolio as of month-end will be posted to www.dws-scudder.com on or after the last day of the following month. In addition, the Portfolio's top ten holdings and other information about the Portfolio is posted on www.dws-scudder.com as of the calendar quarter-end on or after the 15th day following quarter-end.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2007
DWS International VIP
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Common Stocks 97.8% |
Australia 3.1% |
Leighton Holdings Ltd. (a) | 205,400 | 10,950,261 |
QBE Insurance Group Ltd. | 274,600 | 8,001,588 |
Rio Tinto Ltd. | 29,500 | 3,444,125 |
(Cost $18,520,122) | 22,395,974 |
Austria 1.8% |
Erste Bank der oesterreichischen Sparkassen AG | 102,749 | 7,302,872 |
Wienerberger AG | 98,554 | 5,444,124 |
(Cost $12,232,946) | 12,746,996 |
Belgium 3.2% |
Fortis | 213,734 | 5,554,351 |
InBev NV | 126,600 | 10,444,257 |
KBC Groep NV | 46,700 | 6,522,394 |
(Cost $19,728,345) | 22,521,002 |
Brazil 0.7% |
Redecard SA (GDR) 144A (Cost $4,526,841) | 148,500 | 4,805,393 |
China 0.5% |
China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. "H" (Cost $3,834,267) | 827,500 | 3,353,302 |
Colombia 0.8% |
Bancolombia SA (ADR) (REG S) (Preferred) (Cost $5,639,432) | 161,600 | 5,497,632 |
Cyprus 1.4% |
Bank of Cyprus PCL (Cost $9,218,633) | 540,816 | 9,924,968 |
Denmark 0.2% |
Rockwool International A/S "B" (Cost $2,126,656) | 6,800 | 1,567,533 |
Egypt 1.5% |
Orascom Construction Industries (GDR) (REG S) (Cost $9,446,319) | 52,450 | 10,984,023 |
Finland 2.6% |
Nokia Oyj | 165,300 | 6,364,785 |
Nokian Renkaat Oyj | 356,810 | 12,429,508 |
(Cost $12,178,387) | 18,794,293 |
France 3.9% |
Axa | 123,265 | 4,907,961 |
France Telecom SA | 145,626 | 5,226,060 |
Societe Generale | 29,012 | 4,146,248 |
Total SA | 100,449 | 8,336,223 |
Vallourec SA | 19,899 | 5,356,898 |
(Cost $23,543,125) | 27,973,390 |
Germany 11.9% |
Adidas AG | 78,500 | 5,844,854 |
Bayer AG | 129,492 | 11,806,372 |
Daimler AG (Registered) | 55,100 | 5,337,114 |
E.ON AG | 72,568 | 15,408,061 |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. | 131,382 | 7,027,688 |
GEA Group AG* | 166,504 | 5,750,758 |
Gerresheimer AG* | 117,699 | 6,538,832 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Hamburger Hafen- und Logistik AG* | 20,700 | 1,846,131 |
Linde AG | 58,100 | 7,652,107 |
Merck KGaA | 32,903 | 4,226,694 |
Siemens AG (Registered) | 87,418 | 13,723,691 |
(Cost $56,955,160) | 85,162,302 |
Greece 2.7% |
Hellenic Telecommunications Organization SA | 266,820 | 9,806,011 |
National Bank of Greece SA | 136,500 | 9,403,104 |
(Cost $9,931,835) | 19,209,115 |
Hong Kong 3.8% |
China Mobile Ltd. | 279,500 | 4,843,570 |
Esprit Holdings Ltd. | 995,000 | 14,736,882 |
Kingboard Chemical Holdings Ltd. | 164,900 | 963,681 |
Noble Group Ltd. | 1,277,000 | 2,128,935 |
Wharf Holdings Ltd. | 912,000 | 4,707,166 |
(Cost $21,996,808) | 27,380,234 |
India 2.5% |
Bharti Airtel Ltd.* | 476,201 | 11,892,211 |
Housing Development Finance Corp., Ltd. | 28,333 | 2,032,920 |
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. | 16,043 | 1,687,074 |
Suzlon Energy Ltd. | 38,043 | 1,869,121 |
(Cost $15,729,067) | 17,481,326 |
Indonesia 1.3% |
PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia (ADR) (Cost $9,784,283) | 212,400 | 8,922,924 |
Italy 1.9% |
UniCredito Italiano SpA (Cost $12,516,419) | 1,648,873 | 13,722,662 |
Japan 13.7% |
Canon, Inc. | 291,050 | 13,298,167 |
Japan Tobacco, Inc. | 3,181 | 18,861,457 |
JFE Holdings, Inc. | 145,000 | 7,306,643 |
Komatsu Ltd. | 282,000 | 7,624,723 |
Makita Corp. | 106,000 | 4,429,289 |
Mitsubishi Corp. | 307,000 | 8,362,398 |
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. | 495,075 | 4,608,068 |
Mitsui Fudosan Co., Ltd. | 187,000 | 4,041,432 |
Nintendo Co., Ltd. | 12,600 | 7,650,061 |
Sumitomo Corp. | 255,000 | 3,631,022 |
Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd. | 529,000 | 4,860,378 |
Suzuki Motor Corp. | 442,000 | 13,293,473 |
(Cost $87,972,725) | 97,967,111 |
Kazakhstan 0.8% |
KazMunaiGas Exploration Production (GDR) 144A (Cost $4,356,130) | 187,900 | 5,824,900 |
Korea 0.8% |
Kookmin Bank (Cost $5,645,238) | 79,200 | 5,821,272 |
Mexico 1.6% |
America Movil SAB de CV "L" (ADR) | 64,500 | 3,959,655 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Grupo Financiero Banorte SAB de CV "O" | 1,793,100 | 7,409,436 |
(Cost $10,793,650) | 11,369,091 |
Norway 1.6% |
StatoilHydro ASA (Cost $10,069,591) | 367,900 | 11,375,174 |
Russia 3.7% |
Gazprom (ADR) (b) | 61,900 | 3,509,730 |
Gazprom (ADR) (b) | 170,700 | 9,612,430 |
Novorossiysk Sea Trade Port (GDR) 144A* | 87,900 | 1,758,000 |
Sberbank* | 1,616,388 | 6,744,529 |
Uralkali (GDR) 144A* | 135,800 | 5,058,550 |
(Cost $21,067,937) | 26,683,239 |
Singapore 0.3% |
Olam International Ltd. (Cost $1,874,843) | 933,000 | 1,834,130 |
Spain 5.6% |
Iberdrola Renovables* | 1,489,800 | 12,306,618 |
Iberdrola SA | 492,725 | 7,458,913 |
Industria de Diseno Textil SA | 95,700 | 5,818,747 |
Telefonica SA | 452,960 | 14,638,403 |
(Cost $34,049,473) | 40,222,681 |
Switzerland 9.8% |
ABB Ltd. (Registered) | 249,058 | 7,180,826 |
Compagnie Financiere Richemont SA "A" (Unit) | 185,482 | 12,654,397 |
Julius Baer Holding AG (Registered) | 47,273 | 3,842,521 |
Lonza Group AG (Registered) | 75,803 | 9,117,719 |
Nestle SA (Registered) | 22,285 | 10,211,291 |
Novartis AG (Registered) | 227,220 | 12,378,545 |
Roche Holding AG (Genusschein) | 39,535 | 6,809,957 |
Xstrata PLC | 115,738 | 8,149,849 |
(Cost $53,407,333) | 70,345,105 |
United Arab Emirates 1.3% |
DP World Ltd.* | 1,832,869 | 2,181,114 |
| Shares | Value ($) |
| |
Emaar Properties | 1,702,687 | 6,907,923 |
(Cost $8,078,095) | 9,089,037 |
United Kingdom 14.8% |
3i Group PLC | 579,350 | 11,514,036 |
AMEC PLC | 1,451,207 | 24,072,086 |
Anglo American PLC | 164,992 | 9,999,157 |
BAE Systems PLC | 396,834 | 3,886,452 |
Croda International PLC | 475,322 | 5,455,081 |
Greene King PLC | 304,237 | 4,807,565 |
Intertek Group PLC | 294,263 | 5,769,299 |
Prudential PLC | 604,462 | 8,496,544 |
Serco Group PLC | 595,748 | 5,445,762 |
Standard Chartered PLC | 241,485 | 8,769,947 |
Tesco PLC | 636,237 | 6,007,791 |
Vodafone Group PLC | 1,295,674 | 4,828,994 |
Whitbread PLC | 232,104 | 6,432,838 |
(Cost $87,919,414) | 105,485,552 |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $573,143,074) | 698,460,361 |
|
Preferred Stocks 1.8% |
Germany |
Porsche AG (Cost $8,396,954) | 6,529 | 13,157,214 |
|
Rights 0.0% |
Hong Kong |
Wharf Holdings Ltd., expiration date 1/8/2008* (Cost $0) | 114,000 | 156,436 |
|
Securities Lending Collateral 1.2% |
Daily Assets Fund Institutional, 5.03%(c) (d) (Cost $8,184,100) | 8,184,100 | 8,184,100 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $589,724,128)+ | 100.8 | 719,958,111 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (0.8) | (5,786,660) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 714,171,451 |
* Non-income producing security.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $592,700,703. At December 31, 2007, net unrealized appreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $127,257,408. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $147,675,305 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $20,417,897.(a) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2007 amounted to $7,729,950 which is 1.1% of net assets.(b) Securities with the same description are the same corporate entity but trade on different stock exchanges.(c) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(d) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio" is net of borrower rebates.144A: Security exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration, normally to qualified institutional buyers.
ADR: American Depositary Receipt
GDR: Global Depositary Receipt
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2007
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $581,540,028), including $7,729,950 of securities loaned | $ 711,774,011 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $8,184,100)* | 8,184,100 |
Total investments, at value (cost $589,724,128)
| 719,958,111 |
Cash
| 4,424,760 |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $3,898,528)
| 3,908,308 |
Receivable for investments sold
| 1,248,419 |
Dividends receivable
| 659,833 |
Interest receivable
| 48,437 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 345,070 |
Foreign taxes recoverable
| 208,840 |
Due from Advisor
| 10,736 |
Other assets
| 17,322 |
Total assets
| 730,829,836 |
Liabilities |
Payable for investments purchased
| 5,239,468 |
Note payable
| 1,375,000 |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 997,607 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 8,184,100 |
Deferred foreign taxes payable
| 152,816 |
Accrued management fee
| 447,777 |
Accrued distribution and service fee (Class B)
| 2,294 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 259,323 |
Total liabilities
| 16,658,385 |
Net assets, at value | $ 714,171,451 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Undistributed net investment income
| 7,187,701 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments (net of deferred foreign taxes of $152,816) | 130,081,167 |
Foreign currency | 23,434 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| 92,815,850 |
Paid-in capital
| 484,063,299 |
Net assets, at value | $ 714,171,451 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($701,902,668 ÷ 46,761,118 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 15.01 |
Class B Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($12,268,783 ÷ 818,856 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 14.98 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2007
|
Investment Income |
Income:
| |
Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $1,363,096)
| $ 17,266,769 |
Interest
| 106,904 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 670,976 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 555,768 |
Total Income
| 18,600,417 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 5,588,748 |
Administration fee
| 756,054 |
Custodian fee
| 505,569 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 64,471 |
Services to shareholders
| 2,759 |
Record keeping fee (Class B)
| 37,816 |
Professional fees
| 76,014 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 24,604 |
Reports to shareholders
| 379,475 |
Interest expense
| 19,580 |
Other
| 52,448 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 7,507,538 |
Expense reductions
| (5,056) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 7,502,482 |
Net investment income (loss) | 11,097,935 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments (net of foreign taxes of $11,829)
| 163,580,567 |
Foreign currency (net of foreign tax credit of $108,020)
| (133,332) |
| 163,447,235 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments (net of deferred foreign taxes of $152,816)
| (70,499,536) |
Foreign currency
| 9,243 |
| (70,490,293) |
Net gain (loss) | 92,956,942 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ 104,054,877 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Years Ended December 31, |
2007 | 2006 |
Operations: Net investment income (loss)
| $ 11,097,935 | $ 15,259,751 |
Net realized gain (loss)
| 163,447,235 | 105,689,498 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (70,490,293) | 32,558,104 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| 104,054,877 | 153,507,353 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net investment income:
Class A | (17,645,331) | (11,465,310) |
Class B | (1,050,909) | (663,494) |
Total distributions
| (18,696,240) | (12,128,804) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 64,649,737 | 71,568,481 |
Net assets acquired in tax-free reorganization
| — | 14,831,229 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 17,645,331 | 11,465,310 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (163,705,768) | (85,718,829) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| (81,410,700) | 12,146,191 |
Class B Proceeds from shares sold
| 1,213,337 | 10,863,495 |
Net assets acquired in tax-free reorganization
| — | 6,770,201 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 1,050,909 | 663,494 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (45,235,722) | (16,697,624) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| (42,971,476) | 1,599,566 |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | (39,023,539) | 155,124,306 |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 753,194,990 | 598,070,684 |
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $7,187,701 and $10,256,171, respectively)
| $ 714,171,451 | $ 753,194,990 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 52,299,023 | 51,410,562 |
Shares sold
| 4,471,485 | 5,986,549 |
Shares issued in tax-free reorganization
| — | 1,133,856 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of dividends
| 1,243,505 | 924,622 |
Shares redeemed
| (11,252,895) | (7,156,566) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| (5,537,905) | 888,461 |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 46,761,118 | 52,299,023 |
Class B Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 3,829,429 | 3,739,529 |
Shares sold
| 84,891 | 862,789 |
Shares issued in tax-free reorganization
| — | 519,174 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of dividends
| 74,060 | 53,508 |
Shares redeemed
| (3,169,524) | (1,345,571) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| (3,010,573) | 89,900 |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 818,856 | 3,829,429 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 13.42 | $ 10.85 | $ 9.50 | $ 8.26 | $ 6.52 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .21c | .28b | .15 | .09 | .09 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 1.73 | 2.51 | 1.36 | 1.26 | 1.70 |
Total from investment operations | 1.94 | 2.79 | 1.51 | 1.35 | 1.79 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.35) | (.22) | (.16) | (.11) | (.05) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 15.01 | $ 13.42 | $ 10.85 | $ 9.50 | $ 8.26 |
Total Return (%)
| 14.59 | 25.91 | 16.17 | 16.53 | 27.75 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 702 | 702 | 558 | 533 | 485 |
Ratio of expenses (%)
| .98 | .98 | 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.05 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| 1.48c | 2.32b | 1.59 | 1.05 | 1.32 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 108 | 105 | 59 | 73 | 119 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.11 per share and 0.92% of average daily net assets, respectively. c Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.05 per share and 0.33% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Class B Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 13.38 | $ 10.82 | $ 9.48 | $ 8.24 | $ 6.50 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .16d | .24c | .12 | .06 | .07 |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 1.73 | 2.50 | 1.35 | 1.27 | 1.71 |
Total from investment operations | 1.89 | 2.74 | 1.47 | 1.33 | 1.78 |
Less distributions from: Net investment income | (.29) | (.18) | (.13) | (.09) | (.04) |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 14.98 | $ 13.38 | $ 10.82 | $ 9.48 | $ 8.24 |
Total Return (%)
| 14.25b | 25.44b | 15.71b | 16.24b | 27.52 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 12 | 51 | 40 | 35 | 24 |
Ratio of expenses before expense reductions (%)
| 1.41 | 1.37 | 1.41 | 1.38 | 1.32 |
Ratio of expenses after expense reductions (%)
| 1.39 | 1.36 | 1.37 | 1.35 | 1.32 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| 1.07d | 1.94c | 1.24 | .74 | 1.05 |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 108 | 105 | 59 | 73 | 119 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Total return would have been lower had certain expenses not been reduced. c Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.11 per share and 0.92% of average daily net assets, respectively. d Net investment income per share and the ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.05 per share and 0.33% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Performance Summary December 31, 2007
DWS Health Care VIP
All performance shown is historical, assumes reinvestment of all dividend and capital gain distributions, and does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal value fluctuate with changing market conditions so that, when redeemed, shares may be worth more or less then their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Please contact your participating insurance company for the Portfolio's most recent month-end performance. Performance doesn't reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option. These charges and fees will reduce returns. While all share classes have the same underlying portfolio, their performance will differ.
The total annual portfolio operating expense ratios, gross of any fee waivers or expense reimbursements, as stated in the fee table of the prospectus dated May 1, 2007 are 0.89% and 1.28% for Class A and Class B shares, respectively. Please see the Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses, the Financial Highlights and Notes to the Financial Statements (Note C, Related Parties) sections of this report for gross and net expense related disclosure for the period ended December 31, 2007.
Risk Considerations
This Portfolio is subject to stock market risk. The Portfolio may focus its investments on certain industry sectors, thereby increasing its vulnerability to any single industry or regulatory development. All of these factors may result in greater share price volatility. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
Growth of an Assumed $10,000 Investment |
[] DWS Health Care VIP — Class A [] S&P 500® Index [] S&P® GSSI Health Care Sector Index | The Standard & Poor's® 500 (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries. The S&P® GSSI Health Care Sector Index is an unmanaged, market capitalization-weighted index of 133 stocks designed to measure the performance of companies in the health care sector. Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index. |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b3a2/5b3a20d54bc9f69bbea5e5eab097267b414c1325" alt="svs1_g10k630" | |
Yearly periods ended December 31 |
|
Comparative Results |
DWS Health Care VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | Life of Portfolio* |
Class A | Growth of $10,000
| $11,320 | $13,040 | $19,106 | $15,648 |
Average annual total return
| 13.20% | 9.25% | 13.82% | 6.93% |
S&P 500 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,549 | $12,816 | $18,286 | $13,213 |
Average annual total return
| 5.49% | 8.62% | 12.83% | 4.27% |
S&P GSSI Health Care Sector Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,826 | $12,797 | $16,756 | $13,551 |
Average annual total return
| 8.26% | 8.57% | 10.87% | 4.66% |
DWS Health Care VIP | 1-Year | 3-Year | 5-Year | Life of Class** |
Class B | Growth of $10,000
| $11,288 | $12,902 | $18,762 | $18,994 |
Average annual total return
| 12.88% | 8.86% | 13.41% | 12.37% |
S&P 500 Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,549 | $12,816 | $18,286 | $16,403 |
Average annual total return
| 5.49% | 8.62% | 12.83% | 9.42% |
S&P GSSI Health Care Sector Index
| Growth of $10,000
| $10,826 | $12,797 | $16,756 | $16,224 |
Average annual total return
| 8.26% | 8.57% | 10.87% | 9.18% |
The growth of $10,000 is cumulative.
* The Portfolio commenced operations on May 1, 2001. Index returns began on April 30, 2001.** The Portfolio commenced offering Class B shares on July 1, 2002. Index returns began on June 30, 2002.Information About Your Portfolio's Expenses
DWS Health Care VIP
As an investor of the Portfolio, you incur two types of costs: ongoing expenses and transaction costs. Ongoing expenses include management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees and other Portfolio expenses. Examples of transaction costs include contract charges, redemption fees and account maintenance fees, which are not shown in this section. The following tables are intended to help you understand your ongoing expenses (in dollars) of investing in the Portfolio and to help you compare these expenses with the ongoing expenses of investing in other mutual funds. The example in the table is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the six-month period and held for the entire period (July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007).
The tables illustrate your Portfolio's expenses in two ways:
Actual Portfolio Return. This helps you estimate the actual dollar amount of ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) paid on a $1,000 investment in the Portfolio using the Portfolio's actual return during the period. To estimate the expenses you paid over the period, simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line under the share class you hold.
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return. This helps you to compare your Portfolio's ongoing expenses (but not transaction costs) with those of other mutual funds using the Portfolio's actual expense ratio and a hypothetical rate of return of 5% per year before expenses. Examples using a 5% hypothetical Portfolio return may be found in the shareholder reports of other mutual funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Please note that the expenses shown in these tables are meant to highlight your ongoing expenses only and do not reflect any transaction costs. The "Expenses Paid per $1,000" line of the tables is useful in comparing ongoing expenses only and will not help you determine the relative total expense of owning different funds. If these transaction costs had been included, your costs would have been higher.
Expenses and Value of a $1,000 Investment for the six months ended December 31, 2007 |
Actual Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 1,056.10 | | $ 1,053.40 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 4.72 | | $ 6.68 | |
Hypothetical 5% Portfolio Return | Class A | | Class B | |
Beginning Account Value 7/1/07
| $ 1,000.00 | | $ 1,000.00 | |
Ending Account Value 12/31/07
| $ 1.020.62 | | $ 1,018.70 | |
Expenses Paid per $1,000*
| $ 4.63 | | $ 6.56 | |
* Expenses are equal to the Portfolio's annualized expense ratio for each share class, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by the number of days in the most recent six-month period, then divided by 365.Annualized Expense Ratios | Class A | | Class B | |
DWS Variable Series I — DWS Health Care VIP
| .91% | | 1.29% | |
For more information, please refer to the Portfolio's prospectus.
These tables do not reflect charges and fees ("contract charges") associated with the separate account that invests in the Portfolio or any variable life insurance policy or variable annuity contract for which the Portfolio is an investment option.
Management Summary December 31, 2007
DWS Health Care VIP
During a time of uncertainty about the near-term strength of the US economy and increased investor focus on defensive sectors such as health care, DWS Health Care VIP posted a 13.20% return for its most recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (Class A shares, unadjusted for contract charges). In comparison, Portfolio's benchmarks, the S&P 500® Index returned 5.49% and the S&P® GSSI Health Care Sector Index, returned 8.26%.
For the period, several stocks made significant contributions to performance. BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. posted strong gains, as the company submitted its application to the Food and Drug Administration for marketing authorization of its drug Kuvan for the treatment of phenylketonuria, a rare genetic disorder caused by an enzyme deficiency. Covance, Inc., a contract research organization (i.e., a type of company that performs a wide range of research services, including conducting drug trials on a contract basis), performed well, driven by the continued outsourcing trend by pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. The largest detractors from the fund's comparative performance over the period were underweight positions in Merck & Co., Inc. and Johnson & Johnson.1 Merck continued to exceed earnings expectations, driven primarily by new product launches and cost containment, and Johnson & Johnson benefited from investors' view of it as a defensive stock given its diversified revenue base.
With the continuing strength of the US economy uncertain, we believe that investors are likely to continue focusing on defensive areas of the market such as health care stocks. However, we are mindful of the risk that news headlines surrounding the upcoming US presidential election may dampen enthusiasm for the sector, as reducing health care costs and increasing access for the uninsured are key priorities for voters and candidates. Longer term, we continue to believe that health care stocks are attractive, based on positive demographic trends and the emergence of new technologies.
Leefin Lai, CFA, CPA
Managing Director and Portfolio Manager
Thomas E. Bucher, CFA
Managing Director and Consultant to the Portfolio
Risk Considerations
This Portfolio is subject to stock market risk. The Portfolio will focus its investments in the industries of the health care sector, thereby increasing its vulnerability to that sector or regulatory development within such sector. All of these factors may result in greater share price volatility. Please read this Portfolio's prospectus for specific details regarding its investments and risk profile.
1 "Overweight" means the portfolio holds a higher weighting in a given sector or security than the benchmark. "Underweight" means the portfolio holds a lower weighting.The Standard & Poor's 500® (S&P 500) Index is an unmanaged, capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks. The index is designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.
The S&P® GSSI Health Care Sector Index is an unmanaged, market-capitalization-weighted index of 133 stocks designed to measure the performance of companies in the health care sector.
Index returns assume the reinvestment of dividends and, unlike portfolio returns, do not reflect any fees or expenses. It is not possible to invest directly into an index.
Portfolio management market commentary is as of December 31, 2007, and may not come to pass. This information is subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Portfolio Summary
DWS Health Care VIP
Asset Allocation (As a % of Investment Portfolio excluding Securities Lending Collateral) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Common Stocks | 99% | 99% |
Cash Equivalents | 1% | 1% |
| 100% | 100% |
Industry Diversification (As a % of Common Stocks) | 12/31/07 | 12/31/06 |
| | |
Pharmaceuticals | 31% | 35% |
Health Care Services | 22% | 24% |
Medical Supply & Specialty | 21% | 19% |
Biotechnology | 21% | 18% |
Life Sciences Equipment | 5% | 3% |
Hospital Management | — | 1% |
| 100% | 100% |
Asset allocation and industry diversification are subject to change.
For more complete details about the Portfolio's investment portfolio, see page 87. Information concerning portfolio holdings of the Portfolio as of month-end will be posted to www.dws-scudder.com on the or after the last day of the following month. In addition, the Portfolio's top ten holdings and other information about the Portfolio is posted on www.dws-scudder.com as of the calendar quarter-end on or after the 15th day following quarter-end.
Following the Portfolio's fiscal first and third quarter-end, a complete portfolio holdings listing is filed with the SEC on Form N-Q. The form will be available on the SEC's Web site at www.sec.gov, and it also may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Information on the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Investment Portfolio December 31, 2007
DWS Health Care VIP
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Common Stocks 98.4% |
Health Care 98.4% |
Biotechnology 20.6% |
Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* (a) | 14,300 | 1,072,929 |
Amgen, Inc.* | 28,350 | 1,316,574 |
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 5,200 | 192,400 |
Applera Corp. — Celera Group* | 76,100 | 1,207,707 |
Biogen Idec, Inc.* | 28,720 | 1,634,742 |
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc.* (a) | 46,300 | 1,639,020 |
Celgene Corp.* | 34,200 | 1,580,382 |
Cepheid, Inc.* (a) | 35,600 | 938,060 |
Gen-Probe, Inc.* | 9,400 | 591,542 |
Genentech, Inc.* | 24,800 | 1,663,336 |
Genmab A/S* (a) | 8,500 | 508,783 |
Genzyme Corp.* | 28,400 | 2,114,096 |
Gilead Sciences, Inc.* | 59,200 | 2,723,792 |
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.* (a) | 27,600 | 231,840 |
Medarex, Inc.* | 21,400 | 222,988 |
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 38,700 | 579,726 |
Myriad Genetics, Inc.* | 9,900 | 459,558 |
Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 9,500 | 528,390 |
PDL BioPharma, Inc.* | 40,500 | 709,560 |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 30,000 | 724,500 |
United Therapeutics Corp.* | 5,000 | 488,250 |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 13,600 | 315,928 |
| 21,444,103 |
Health Care Services 21.4% |
Aetna, Inc. | 29,000 | 1,674,170 |
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions, Inc.* | 39,100 | 759,322 |
Covance, Inc.* | 14,100 | 1,221,342 |
CVS Caremark Corp. | 48,831 | 1,941,032 |
Express Scripts, Inc.* | 23,200 | 1,693,600 |
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. | 29,197 | 1,561,762 |
Henry Schein, Inc.* | 22,600 | 1,387,640 |
Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings* | 21,700 | 1,639,001 |
McKesson Corp. | 30,800 | 2,017,708 |
Medco Health Solutions, Inc.* | 15,684 | 1,590,358 |
Quality Systems, Inc. (a) | 31,100 | 948,239 |
Quest Diagnostics, Inc. | 28,300 | 1,497,070 |
TriZetto Group, Inc.* | 29,100 | 505,467 |
UnitedHealth Group, Inc. | 33,200 | 1,932,240 |
WellPoint, Inc.* | 20,700 | 1,816,011 |
| 22,184,962 |
Life Sciences Equipment 5.5% |
Applera Corp. — Applied Biosystems Group | 15,800 | 535,936 |
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.* | 8,200 | 539,560 |
Pharmaceutical Product Development, Inc. | 32,200 | 1,299,914 |
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.* | 58,200 | 3,356,976 |
| 5,732,386 |
| Shares
| Value ($) |
| |
Medical Supply & Specialty 20.7% |
Alcon, Inc. | 11,000 | 1,573,440 |
ArthroCare Corp.* (a) | 18,800 | 903,340 |
Baxter International, Inc. | 48,800 | 2,832,840 |
Beckman Coulter, Inc. | 8,100 | 589,680 |
Becton, Dickinson & Co. | 24,500 | 2,047,710 |
C.R. Bard, Inc. | 28,700 | 2,720,760 |
Covidien Ltd. | 13,200 | 584,628 |
Hologic, Inc.* | 31,400 | 2,155,296 |
Medtronic, Inc. | 56,500 | 2,840,255 |
Mentor Corp. (a) | 10,800 | 422,280 |
NuVasive, Inc.* | 24,500 | 968,240 |
Respironics, Inc.* | 10,500 | 687,540 |
SonoSite, Inc.* (a) | 14,300 | 481,481 |
Stryker Corp. | 25,700 | 1,920,304 |
Zimmer Holdings, Inc.* | 12,100 | 800,415 |
| 21,528,209 |
Pharmaceuticals 30.2% |
Abbott Laboratories | 45,000 | 2,526,750 |
Allergan, Inc. | 23,300 | 1,496,792 |
Astellas Pharma, Inc. | 25,200 | 1,099,404 |
Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc.* | 11,600 | 615,960 |
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 61,300 | 1,625,676 |
Cardiome Pharma Corp.* (a) | 28,600 | 255,112 |
Eli Lilly & Co. | 37,300 | 1,991,447 |
Forest Laboratories, Inc.* | 11,800 | 430,110 |
Johnson & Johnson | 36,500 | 2,434,550 |
Merck & Co., Inc. | 45,000 | 2,614,950 |
Merck KGaA | 11,162 | 1,433,862 |
Mylan, Inc. (a) | 85,500 | 1,202,130 |
Novartis AG (Registered) | 20,296 | 1,105,690 |
Pfizer, Inc. | 78,240 | 1,778,395 |
Pharmion Corp.* | 8,200 | 515,452 |
Roche Holding AG (Genusschein) | 16,479 | 2,838,530 |
Sanofi-Aventis | 14,044 | 1,283,628 |
Schering-Plough Corp. | 68,400 | 1,822,176 |
Shire PLC (ADR) | 20,300 | 1,399,685 |
Stada Arzneimittel AG | 16,297 | 994,696 |
Wyeth | 42,000 | 1,855,980 |
| 31,320,975 |
Total Common Stocks (Cost $71,348,072) | 102,210,635 |
|
Securities Lending Collateral 5.4% |
Daily Assets Fund Institutional, 5.03% (b) (c) (Cost $5,664,522) | 5,664,522 | 5,664,522 |
|
Cash Equivalents 0.8% |
Cash Management QP Trust, 4.67% (b) (Cost $809,218) | 809,218 | 809,218 |
| % of Net Assets | Value ($) |
| |
Total Investment Portfolio (Cost $ 77,821,812)+ | 104.6 | 108,684,375 |
Other Assets and Liabilities, Net | (4.6) | (4,787,440) |
Net Assets | 100.0 | 103,896,935 |
* Non-income producing security.+ The cost for federal income tax purposes was $78,245,415. At December 31, 2007, net unrealized appreciation for all securities based on tax cost was $30,438,960. This consisted of aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of value over tax cost of $32,581,484 and aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for all securities in which there was an excess of tax cost over value of $2,142,524.(a) All or a portion of these securities were on loan (see Notes to Financial Statements). The value of all securities loaned at December 31, 2007 amounted to $5,449,612 which is 5.2% of net assets.(b) Affiliated fund managed by Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. The rate shown is the annualized seven-day yield at period end.(c) Represents collateral held in connection with securities lending. Income earned by the Portfolio is net of borrower rebates.ADR: American Depositary Receipt
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2007
|
Assets |
Investments:
Investments in securities, at value (cost $71,348,072), including $5,449,612 of securities loaned | $ 102,210,635 |
Investment in Daily Assets Fund Institutional (cost $5,664,522)* | 5,664,522 |
Investment in Cash Management QP Trust (cost $809,218) | 809,218 |
Total investments, at value (cost $77,821,812)
| 108,684,375 |
Cash
| 4,756 |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $1,001,484)
| 1,019,553 |
Dividends receivable
| 56,336 |
Interest receivable
| 6,983 |
Receivable for Portfolio shares sold
| 1,441 |
Foreign taxes recoverable
| 1,190 |
Due from Advisor
| 40,305 |
Other assets
| 2,804 |
Total assets
| 109,817,743 |
Liabilities |
Payable for Portfolio shares redeemed
| 103,594 |
Payable upon return of securities loaned
| 5,664,522 |
Accrued management fee
| 59,328 |
Accrued distribution service fee (Class B)
| 1,182 |
Other accrued expenses and payables
| 92,182 |
Total liabilities
| 5,920,808 |
Net assets, at value | $ 103,896,935 |
Net Assets Consist of |
Undistributed net investment income
| 254,916 |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on:
Investments | 30,862,563 |
Foreign currency | 18,188 |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
| 14,857,233 |
Paid-in capital
| 57,904,035 |
Net assets, at value | $ 103,896,935 |
Class A Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($98,470,674 ÷ 6,708,658 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 14.68 |
Class B Net Asset Value, offering and redemption price per share ($5,426,261 ÷ 376,902 outstanding shares of beneficial interest, no par value, unlimited number of shares authorized)
| $ 14.40 |
* Represents collateral on securities loaned.The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2007
|
Investment Income |
Income: Dividends (net of foreign taxes withheld of $41,856)
| $ 1,130,490 |
Interest
| 2,155 |
Interest — Cash Management QP Trust
| 80,879 |
Securities lending income, including income from Daily Assets Fund Institutional, net of borrower rebates
| 50,443 |
Total Income
| 1,263,967 |
Expenses: Management fee
| 745,355 |
Administration fee
| 112,083 |
Custodian fee
| 20,883 |
Distribution service fee (Class B)
| 27,047 |
Services to shareholders
| 777 |
Record keeping fee (Class B)
| 14,285 |
Professional fees
| 62,587 |
Trustees' fees and expenses
| 6,689 |
Reports to shareholders
| 79,139 |
Other
| 22,172 |
Total expenses before expense reductions
| 1,091,017 |
Expense reductions
| (197) |
Total expenses after expense reductions
| 1,090,820 |
Net investment income (loss) | 173,147 |
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) |
Net realized gain (loss) from: Investments
| 15,369,597 |
Foreign currency
| 81,769 |
| 15,451,366 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: Investments
| (1,119,422) |
Foreign currency
| (9,572) |
| (1,128,994) |
Net gain (loss) | 14,322,372 |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ 14,495,519 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Statement of Changes in Net Assets |
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Years Ended December 31, |
2007 | 2006 |
Operations: Net investment income (loss)
| $ 173,147 | $ (123,883) |
Net realized gain (loss)
| 15,451,366 | 7,441,060 |
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
| (1,128,994) | (72,911) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations
| 14,495,519 | 7,244,266 |
Distributions to shareholders from: Net realized gains:
Class A | (6,096,998) | (391,880) |
Class B | (1,254,197) | (84,353) |
Total distributions
| (7,351,195) | (476,233) |
Portfolio share transactions:
Class A Proceeds from shares sold
| 9,495,145 | 7,469,837 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 6,096,998 | 391,880 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (24,413,031) | (21,696,464) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class A share transactions
| (8,820,888) | (13,834,747) |
Class B Proceeds from shares sold
| 827,879 | 2,569,906 |
Reinvestment of distributions
| 1,254,197 | 84,353 |
Cost of shares redeemed
| (18,374,489) | (5,647,967) |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets from Class B share transactions
| (16,292,413) | (2,993,708) |
Increase (decrease) in net assets | (17,968,977) | (10,060,422) |
Net assets at beginning of period
| 121,865,912 | 131,926,334 |
Net assets at end of period (including undistributed net investment income of $254,916 and $0, respectively)
| $ 103,896,935 | $ 121,865,912 |
Other Information |
Class A Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 7,330,897 | 8,377,800 |
Shares sold
| 663,065 | 565,517 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 431,188 | 30,640 |
Shares redeemed
| (1,716,492) | (1,643,060) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class A shares
| (622,239) | (1,046,903) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 6,708,658 | 7,330,897 |
Class B Shares outstanding at beginning of period
| 1,544,881 | 1,772,301 |
Shares sold
| 59,012 | 201,649 |
Shares issued to shareholders in reinvestment of distributions
| 90,295 | 6,684 |
Shares redeemed
| (1,317,286) | (435,753) |
Net increase (decrease) in Class B shares
| (1,167,979) | (227,420) |
Shares outstanding at end of period
| 376,902 | 1,544,881 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Financial Highlights
Class A Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 13.77 | $ 13.02 | $ 12.00 | $ 10.95 | $ 8.19 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | .03c | (.01)b | (.02) | (.03) | (.02) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 1.75 | .81 | 1.04 | 1.08 | 2.78 |
Total from investment operations | 1.78 | .80 | 1.02 | 1.05 | 2.76 |
Less distributions from: Net realized gains | (.87) | (.05) | — | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 14.68 | $ 13.77 | $ 13.02 | $ 12.00 | $ 10.95 |
Total Return (%)
| 13.20 | 6.17b | 8.50 | 9.59 | 33.70 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 98 | 101 | 109 | 109 | 101 |
Ratio of expenses (%)
| .93 | .89 | .88 | .88 | .87 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| .19c | (.03)b | (.18) | (.29) | (.24) |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 37 | 47 | 43 | 77 | 64 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Scudder Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.003 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.02%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.02% lower. c Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.02 per share and 0.13% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Class B Years Ended December 31, | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 |
Selected Per Share Data |
Net asset value, beginning of period | $ 13.55 | $ 12.87 | $ 11.91 | $ 10.91 | $ 8.19 |
Income (loss) from investment operations: Net investment income (loss)a | (.03)c | (.06)b | (.07) | (.08) | (.07) |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | 1.75 | .79 | 1.03 | 1.08 | 2.79 |
Total from investment operations | 1.72 | .73 | .96 | 1.00 | 2.72 |
Less distributions from: Net realized gains | (.87) | (.05) | — | — | — |
Net asset value, end of period | $ 14.40 | $ 13.55 | $ 12.87 | $ 11.91 | $ 10.91 |
Total Return (%)
| 12.88 | 5.77b | 8.06 | 9.17 | 33.21 |
Ratios to Average Net Assets and Supplemental Data |
Net assets, end of period ($ millions)
| 5 | 21 | 23 | 20 | 11 |
Ratio of expenses (%)
| 1.34 | 1.28 | 1.27 | 1.27 | 1.26 |
Ratio of net investment income (loss) (%)
| (.22)c | (.42)b | (.57) | (.68) | (.63) |
Portfolio turnover rate (%)
| 37 | 47 | 43 | 77 | 64 |
a Based on average shares outstanding during the period. b Includes non-recurring income from the Advisor recorded as a result of an administrative proceeding regarding disclosure of brokerage allocation practices in connection with sales of DWS Scudder Funds. The non-recurring income resulted in an increase in net investment income of $0.003 per share and an increase in the ratio of net investment income of 0.02%. Excluding this non-recurring income, total return would have been 0.02% lower. c Net investment income per share and ratio of net investment income include non-recurring dividend income amounting to $0.02 per share and 0.13% of average daily net assets, respectively.
|
Notes to Financial Statements
A. Significant Accounting Policies
DWS Variable Series I (the "Series") is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "1940 Act"), as an open-end, registered management investment company organized as a Massachusetts business trust. The Series consists of six diversified portfolios: DWS Bond VIP, DWS Growth & Income VIP, DWS Capital Growth VIP, DWS Global Opportunities VIP, DWS International VIP and DWS Health Care VIP (individually or collectively hereinafter referred to as a "Portfolio" or the "Portfolios"). The Series is intended to be the underlying investment vehicle for variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies to be offered by the separate accounts of certain life insurance companies ("Participating Insurance Companies").
Multiple Classes of Shares of Beneficial Interest. The Series offers two classes of shares (Class A shares and Class B shares) for each of the Portfolios. Class B shares are subject to Rule 12b-1 distribution fees under the 1940 Act and record keeping fees equal to an annual rate of 0.25% and up to 0.15%, respectively, of the average daily net assets of the Class B shares of the applicable Portfolio. Class A shares are not subject to such fees.
Investment income, realized and unrealized gains and losses, and certain portfolio-level expenses and expense reductions, if any, are borne pro rata on the basis of relative net assets by the holders of all classes of shares, except that each class bears certain expenses unique to that class (including the applicable 12b-1 distribution fees and record keeping fees). Differences in class-level expenses may result in payment of different per share dividends by class. All shares have equal rights with respect to voting subject to class-specific arrangements.
The Series' financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of management estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The policies described below are followed consistently by the Series in the preparation of the financial statements for its Portfolios.
Security Valuation. Investments are stated at value determined as of the close of regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange on each day the exchange is open for trading. Equity securities are valued at the most recent sale price or official closing price reported on the exchange (US or foreign) or over-the-counter market on which the security is traded most extensively. Securities for which no sales are reported are valued at the calculated mean between the most recent bid and asked quotations on the relevant market or, if a mean cannot be determined, at the most recent bid quotation.
Debt securities are valued by independent pricing services approved by the Trustees of the Series. If the pricing services are unable to provide valuations, securities are valued at the most recent bid quotation or evaluated price, as applicable, obtained from a broker-dealer. Such services may use various pricing techniques which take into account appropriate factors such as yield, quality, coupon rate, maturity, type of issue, trading characteristics and other data, as well as broker quotes.
Money market instruments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of sixty days or less, maturing at par, are valued at amortized cost. Investments in open-end investment companies and Cash Management QP Trust are valued at their net asset value each business day.
Securities and other assets for which market quotations are not readily available or for which the above valuation procedures are deemed not to reflect fair value are valued in a manner that is intended to reflect their fair value as determined in accordance with procedures approved by the Trustees. The Series may use a fair valuation model to value international equity securities in order to adjust for events which may occur between the close of the foreign exchanges and the close of the New York Stock Exchange.
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) released Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" ("FAS 157"). FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, management does not believe the adoption of FAS 157 will impact the amounts reported in the financial statements, however, additional disclosures will be required about the inputs used to develop the measurements of fair value and the effect of certain of the measurements reported in the statement of operations for a fiscal period.
Securities Lending. Each Portfolio may lend securities to financial institutions. The Portfolio retains beneficial ownership of the securities it has loaned and continues to receive interest and dividends paid by the issuer of securities and to participate in any changes in their market value. The Portfolio requires the borrowers of the securities to maintain collateral with the Portfolio consisting of liquid, unencumbered assets having a value at least equal to the value of the securities loaned. The Portfolio may invest the cash collateral into a joint trading account in an affiliated money market fund pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC. The Portfolio receives compensation for lending its securities either in the form of fees or by earning interest on invested cash collateral net of borrower rebates and fees paid to a lending agent. Either the Portfolio or the borrower may terminate the loan. The Portfolio is subject to all investment risks associated with the value of any cash collateral received, including, but not limited to, interest rate, credit and liquidity risk associated with such investments.
Options. An option contract is a contract in which the writer of the option grants the buyer of the option the right to purchase from (call option), or sell to (put option), the writer a designated instrument at a specified price within a specified period of time. Certain options, including options on indices, will require cash settlement by the Portfolio if the option is exercised. Each Portfolio may enter into option contracts in order to hedge against potential adverse price movements in the value of portfolio assets; as a temporary substitute for selling selected investments; to lock in the purchase price of a security or currency which it expects to purchase in the near future; as a temporary substitute for purchasing selected investments; and to enhance potential gain.
The liability representing the Portfolio's obligation under an exchange traded written option or investment in a purchased option is valued at the last sale price or, in the absence of a sale, the mean between the closing bid and asked prices or at the most recent asked price (bid for purchased options) if no bid and asked prices are available. Over-the-counter written or purchased options are valued using dealer supplied quotations. Gain or loss is recognized when the option contract expires or is closed.
If the Portfolio writes a covered call option, the Portfolio foregoes, in exchange for the premium, the opportunity to profit during the option period from an increase in the market value of the underlying security above the exercise price. If the Portfolio writes a put option it accepts the risk of a decline in the market value of the underlying security below the exercise price. Over-the-counter options have the risk of the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. The Portfolio's maximum exposure to purchased options is limited to the premium initially paid. In addition, certain risks may arise upon entering into option contracts including the risk that an illiquid secondary market will limit the Portfolio's ability to close out an option contract prior to the expiration date and that a change in the value of the option contract may not correlate exactly with changes in the value of the securities or currencies hedged.
Futures Contracts. A futures contract is an agreement between a buyer or seller and an established futures exchange or its clearinghouse in which the buyer or seller agrees to take or make a delivery of a specific amount of a financial instrument at a specified price on a specific date (settlement date). Each Portfolio may enter into futures contracts to keep cash on hand to meet shareholder redemptions or other needs while maintaining exposure to the stock market.
Upon entering into a futures contract, the Portfolio is required to deposit with a financial intermediary an amount ("initial margin") equal to a certain percentage of the face value indicated in the futures contract. Subsequent payments ("variation margin") are made or received by the Portfolio dependent upon the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security and are recorded for financial reporting purposes as unrealized gains or losses by the Portfolio. When entering into a closing transaction, the Portfolio will realize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the futures contract to sell and the futures contract to buy. Futures contracts are valued at the most recent settlement price.
Certain risks may arise upon entering into futures contracts, including the risk that an illiquid secondary market will limit the Portfolio's ability to close out a futures contract prior to the settlement date and that a change in the value of a futures contract may not correlate exactly with the changes in the value of the securities or currencies hedged. When utilizing futures contracts to hedge, the Portfolio gives up the opportunity to profit from favorable price movements in the hedged positions during the term of the contract.
Foreign Currency Translations. The books and records of the Portfolios are maintained in US dollars. Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into US dollars at the prevailing exchange rates at period end. Purchases and sales of investment securities, income and expenses are translated into US dollars at the prevailing exchange rates on the respective dates of the transactions.
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency transactions represent net gains and losses between trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, the disposition of forward foreign currency exchange contracts and foreign currencies, and the difference between the amount of net investment income accrued and the US dollar amount actually received. That portion of both realized and unrealized gains and losses on investments that results from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates is not separately disclosed but is included with net realized and unrealized gain/appreciation and loss/depreciation on investments.
Forward Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts. A forward foreign currency exchange contract ("forward currency contract") is a commitment to purchase or sell a foreign currency at the settlement date at a negotiated rate. The Portfolios may enter into forward currency contracts in order to hedge their exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates on their foreign currency denominated portfolio holdings and to facilitate transactions in foreign currency denominated securities. The Portfolio may also engage in forward currency contracts for non-hedging purposes.
Forward currency contracts are valued at the prevailing forward exchange rate of the underlying currencies and unrealized gain (loss) is recorded daily. Sales and purchases of forward currency contracts having the same settlement date and broker are offset and any gain (loss) is realized on the date of offset; otherwise, gain (loss) is realized on settlement date. Realized and unrealized gains and losses which represent the difference between the value of a forward currency contract to buy and a forward currency contract to sell are included in net realized and unrealized gain (loss) from foreign currency related transactions.
Certain risks may arise upon entering into forward currency contracts from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts. Additionally, when utilizing forward currency contracts to hedge, the Portfolio gives up the opportunity to profit from favorable exchange rate movements during the term of the contract.
Mortgage Dollar Rolls. DWS Bond VIP may enter into mortgage dollar rolls in which the Portfolio sells mortgage-backed securities for delivery in the current month and simultaneously contracts to repurchase similar, but not identical, securities at an agreed upon price and date. During the period between the sale and repurchase, the Portfolio will not be entitled to earn interest and receive principal payment on securities sold. The Portfolio receives compensation as consideration for entering into the commitment to repurchase. The compensation is paid in the form of a lower price for the security upon its repurchase or, alternatively, a fee. Mortgage dollar rolls may be renewed with a new sale and repurchase price and a cash settlement made at each renewal without physical delivery of the securities subject to the contract.
Certain risks may arise upon entering into mortgage dollar rolls from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their commitments. Additionally, the value of the securities sold by the Portfolio may decline below the repurchase price of those securities.
When-Issued/Delayed Delivery Securities. Each Portfolio may purchase securities with delivery or payment to occur at a later date beyond the normal settlement period. At the time a Portfolio enters into a commitment to purchase a security, the transaction is recorded and the value of the security is reflected in the net asset value. The price of such security and the date when the security will be delivered and paid for are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. The value of the security may vary with market fluctuations. No interest accrues to the Portfolio until payment takes place. At the time the Portfolio enters into this type of transaction it is required to segregate cash or other liquid assets at least equal to the amount of the commitment.
Certain risks may arise upon entering into when-issued or delayed delivery securities from the potential inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their contracts or if the issuer does not issue the securities due to political, economic, or other factors. Additionally, losses may arise due to changes in the value of the underlying securities.
Loan Participations and Assignments. DWS Bond VIP may invest in Loan Participations and Assignments. Loan Participations and Assignments are portions of loans originated by banks and sold in pieces to investors. These US dollar-denominated fixed and floating rate loans ("Loans") in which the Portfolio invests, are arranged between the borrower and one or more financial institutions ("Lenders"). These Loans may take the form of Senior Loans, which are corporate obligations often issued in connection with recapitalizations, acquisitions, leveraged buy-outs and refinancings, and Sovereign Loans, which are debt instruments between a foreign sovereign entity and one or more financial institutions. The Portfolio invests in such Loans in the form of participations in Loans ("Participations") or assignments of all or a portion of Loans from third parties ("Assignments"). Participations typically result in the Portfolio having a contractual relationship only with the Lender, not with the borrower. The Portfolio has the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled from the Lender selling the Participation and only upon receipt by the Lender of the payments from the borrower. In connection with purchasing Participations, the Portfolio generally has no right to enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement relating to the Loan, or any rights of set-off against the borrower, and the Portfolio will not benefit directly from any collateral supporting the Loan in which it has purchased the Participation. As a result, the Portfolio assumes the credit risk of both the borrower and the Lender that is selling the Participation. Assignments typically result in the Portfolio having a direct contractual relationship with the borrower, and the Portfolio may enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement. All Loan Participations and Assignments involve interest rate risk, liquidity risk and credit risk, including the potential default or insolvency of the borrower.
Federal Income Taxes. Each Portfolio is treated as a separate taxpayer as provided for in the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. It is each Portfolio's policy to comply with the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, which are applicable to regulated investment companies, and to distribute all of its taxable income to the separate accounts of the Participating Insurance Companies which hold its shares. Accordingly, the Portfolios paid no federal income taxes and no federal income tax provision was required.
Additionally, based on the Series' understanding of the tax rules and rates related to income, gains and transactions for the foreign jurisdictions in which each Portfolio invests, the Series will provide for foreign taxes, and where appropriate, deferred foreign taxes.
At December 31, 2007, the following Portfolios had an approximate net tax basis capital loss carryforward which may be applied against any realized net taxable capital gains of each succeeding year until fully utilized or until the following expiration dates, whichever occurs first:
Portfolio | Capital Loss Carryforwards ($) | Expiration Date | Capital Loss Carryforwards Utilized ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
| 1,266,000 | 12/31/2014 | 494,000 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 4,777,000 | 12/31/2010 | 5,552,000 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 277,224,000 | 12/31/2008 - 12/31/2012 | 104,561,000 |
DWS International VIP
| — | — | 65,177,000 |
In addition, from November 1, 2007 through December 31, 2007, DWS Bond VIP and DWS Growth & Income VIP incurred approximately $136,000 and $4,777,000, respectively, of net realized capital losses. As permitted by tax regulations, the Portfolio intends to elect to defer these losses and treat them as arising in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
At December 31, 2007, DWS Growth & Income VIP had a net tax basis capital loss carryforward of approximately $4,777,000 inherited from its merger with SVS Focus Value+Growth Portfolio, which is included in the table above and may be applied against any realized net taxable gains of each succeeding year until fully utilized or December 31, 2010, the expiration date, whichever occurs first, and which may be subject to certain limitations under Sections 382-384 of the Internal Revenue Code.
At December 31, 2007, the DWS Capital Growth VIP had a net tax basis capital loss carryforward of approximately $277,224,000, of which a portion was inherited from its mergers with the SVS Eagle Focused Large Cap Growth Portfolio, Scudder Growth Portfolio, DWS Oak Strategic Equity VIP and DWS Janus Growth Opportunities VIP, and which is included in the table above and may be applied against any realized net taxable capital gains of each succeeding year until fully utilized or until the expiration dates, whichever occurs first, and which may be subject to certain limitations under Section 382-384 of the Internal Revenue Code. The DWS Captial Growth VIP utilized approximately $2,550,000 of the inherited amounts, which is included in the table above.
Each Portfolio has reviewed the tax positions for each of the three open tax years as of December 31, 2007 and has determined that no provision for income tax is required in each Portfolio's financial statements. Each of the Portfolio's federal tax returns for the prior three fiscal years remains subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.
Distribution of Income and Gains. Each Portfolio will declare and distribute dividends from their net investment income, if any, annually, although additional distributions may be made if necessary. Net realized gains from investment transactions, in excess of available capital loss carryforwards, would be taxable to each Portfolio if not distributed, and, therefore, will be distributed to shareholders at least annually.
The timing and characterization of certain income and capital gains distributions are determined annually in accordance with federal tax regulations which may differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences primarily relate to investments in foreign denominated investments, investments in forward foreign currency exchange contracts, passive foreign investment companies, post October loss deferrals and certain securities sold at a loss. As a result, net investment income (loss) and net realized gain (loss) on investment transactions for a reporting period may differ significantly from distributions during such period. Accordingly, each Portfolio may periodically make reclassifications among certain of its capital accounts without impacting the net asset value of the Portfolio.
At December 31, 2007, the Portfolios' components of distributable earnings (accumulated losses) on a tax-basis are as follows:
Portfolio | Undistributed Ordinary Income ($)* | Undistributed Net Long-Term Capital Gains ($) | Capital Loss Carryforwards ($) | Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Investments ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
| 10,857,922 | — | (1,266,000) | (2,275,293) |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 15,690,875 | 26,213,858 | (4,777,000) | 8,572,144 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 9,689,216 | — | (277,224,000) | 364,230,490 |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 892,809 | 40,011,833 | — | 111,655,663 |
DWS International VIP
| 7,237,144 | 95,745,428 | — | 127,257,408 |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 2,976,747 | 12,559,005 | — | 30,438,960 |
In addition, the tax character of distributions paid to shareholders by the Portfolios is summarized as follows:
| Distributions from Ordinary Income ($)* Years Ended December 31, | Distributions from Long-Term Capital Gains ($) Years Ended December 31, |
Portfolio | 2007 | 2006 | 2007 | 2006 |
DWS Bond VIP
| 10,397,091 | 8,190,063 | — | 71,959 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 3,685,275 | 2,951,248 | 4,265,414 | — |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 7,146,340 | 5,777,373 | — | — |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 5,220,901 | 3,411,928 | 25,733,820 | — |
DWS International VIP
| 18,696,240 | 12,128,804 | — | — |
DWS Health Care VIP
| — | — | 7,351,195 | 476,233 |
* For tax purposes short-term capital gains distributions are considered ordinary income distributions.Expenses. Expenses of the Series arising in connection with a specific Portfolio are allocated to that Portfolio. Other Series expenses which cannot be directly attributed to a Portfolio are apportioned among the Portfolios in the Series.
Contingencies. In the normal course of business, each Portfolio may enter into contracts with service providers that contain general indemnification clauses. Each Portfolio's maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against each Portfolio that have not yet been made. However, based on experience, each Portfolio expects the risk of loss to be remote.
Other. For each Portfolio, investment transactions are accounted for on a trade date plus one basis for daily net asset value calculations. However, for financial reporting purposes, investment transactions are reported on trade date. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis net of foreign withholding taxes. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date net of foreign withholding taxes. Certain dividends from foreign securities may be recorded subsequent to the ex-dividend date as soon as the Portfolio is informed of such dividends. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are recorded on an identified cost basis. All discounts and premiums are accreted/amortized for both tax and financial reporting purposes.
B. Purchases and Sales of Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2007, purchases and sales of investment securities (excluding short-term investments) were as follows:
Portfolio | Purchases ($) | Sales ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
excluding US Treasury Obligations and mortgage dollar roll transactions | 155,502,945 | 147,170,446 |
US Treasury Obligations | 244,106,190 | 234,503,948 |
mortgage dollar roll transactions | 20,260,352 | 21,131,683 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 863,989,169 | 993,674,920 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 341,944,646 | 627,866,923 |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 66,200,157 | 141,601,384 |
DWS International VIP
| 799,440,709 | 907,661,366 |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 39,796,671 | 71,421,766 |
C. Related Parties
Under the Investment Management Agreement with Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. ("DIMA" or the "Advisor"), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, the Advisor directs the investments of the Portfolios in accordance with their investment objectives, policies and restrictions. The Advisor determines the securities, instruments and other contracts relating to investments to be purchased, sold or entered into by the Portfolios or, for DWS Bond VIP, delegates such responsibility to the Portfolio's subadvisor.
Under the Investment Management Agreement with the Advisor, the Portfolios pay a monthly management fee, based on the average daily net assets of each Portfolio, computed and accrued daily and payable monthly, at the annual rates shown below:
Portfolio | Annual Management Fee Rate |
DWS Bond VIP
first $250 million of average daily net assets | .390% |
next $750 million of average daily net assets | .365% |
over $1 billion of average daily net assets | .340% |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
first $250 million of average daily net assets | .390% |
next $750 million of average daily net assets | .365% |
over $1 billion of average daily net assets | .340% |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
first $250 million of average daily net assets | .390% |
next $750 million of average daily net assets | .365% |
over $1 billion of average daily net assets | .340% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
first $500 million of average daily net assets | .890% |
next $500 million of average daily net assets | .875% |
next $1 billion of average daily net assets | .860% |
over $2 billion of average daily net assets | .845% |
DWS International VIP
first $500 million of average daily net assets | .790% |
over $500 million of average daily net assets | .640% |
DWS Health Care VIP
first $250 million of average daily net assets | .665% |
next $750 million of average daily net assets | .640% |
next $1.5 billion of average daily net assets | .615% |
next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets | .595% |
next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets | .565% |
next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets | .555% |
next $2.5 billion of average daily net assets | .545% |
over $12.5 billion of average daily net assets | .535% |
DWS Bond VIP's subadvisor and sub-subadvisor are Aberdeen Asset Management, Inc ('AAMI') and Aberdeen Asset Management Investment Services Limited ('AAMISL'), respectively. AAMI is responsible for the day to day operation of the high-yield and core bond, active fixed-income and high-yield portions of DWS Bond VIP. AAMISL is responsible for the day-to-day management of the foreign securities, foreign currencies and related investments for DWS Bond VIP.
The Advisor, the underwriter and accounting agent contractually agreed to waive a portion of their fee to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses of each class for the period from January 1, 2007 through September 30, 2007 (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage, interest, proxy and organizational and offering costs) as follows:
Portfolio | Annual Rate |
DWS Bond VIP Class A
| .60% |
DWS Bond VIP Class B
| 1.00% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class B
| 1.52% |
In addition, the Advisor, the underwriter and accounting agent contractually agreed to waive a portion of their fee to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses of each class for the period from October 1, 2007 through April 30, 2008 (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage and interest expenses) as follows:
Portfolio | Annual Rate |
DWS Bond VIP Class B
| 1.03% |
In addition, the Advisor, the underwriter and accounting agent contractually agreed to waive a portion of their fee to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses of each class for the period from October 1, 2007 through September 30, 2008 (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage, interest and organizational and offering costs) as follows:
Portfolio | Annual Rate |
DWS Bond VIP Class A
| .63% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class A
| .99% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class B
| 1.39% |
In addition, the Advisor, the underwriter and accounting agent contractually agreed to waive a portion of their fee to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses of each class for the period from January 1, 2007 through April 30, 2010 (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage and interest and organizational and offering costs) as follows:
Portfolio | Annual Rate |
DWS Growth & Income VIP Class A
| .54% |
DWS Growth & Income VIP Class B
| .87% |
In addition, the Advisor, the underwriter and accounting agent contractually agreed to waive a portion of their fee to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses of each class for the period from January 1, 2007 through April 30, 2010 (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage and interest expenses) as follows:
Portfolio | Annual Rate |
DWS Capital Growth VIP Class A
| .49% |
DWS International VIP Class A
| .96% |
In addition, the Advisor, the underwriter and accounting agent contractually agreed to waive a portion of their fee to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses of each class for the period from January 1, 2007 through May 6, 2007 (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage, interest and organizational and offering costs) as follows:
Portfolio | Annual Rate |
DWS Capital Growth VIP Class B
| .86% |
DWS International VIP Class B
| 1.34% |
Effective May 7, 2007 through April 30, 2010, the Advisor, the underwriter and accounting agent contractually agreed to waive a portion of their fee to the extent necessary to maintain the operating expenses of each class (excluding certain expenses such as extraordinary expenses, taxes, brokerage and interest expenses) as follows:
Portfolio | Annual Rate |
DWS Capital Growth VIP Class B
| .82% |
DWS International VIP Class B
| 1.29% |
In addition, for the period from January 1, 2007 through April 27, 2010, the Advisor has contractually agreed to waive 0.01% of the management fee for DWS Growth & Income VIP.
Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2007, the Portfolios waived a portion of their management fees as follows:
Portfolio | Total Aggregated ($) | Waived ($) | Annual Effective Rate |
DWS Bond VIP
| 873,517 | — | .39% |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 1,103,548 | 28,536 | .38% |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 4,224,782 | 118,582 | .36% |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 3,148,776 | 85,694 | .87% |
DWS International VIP
| 5,588,748 | — | .74% |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 745,355 | — | .665% |
In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2007, the Advisor waived record keeping expenses of Class B shares of each Portfolio as follows:
Portfolio | Waived |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 6,720 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 11,147 |
DWS International VIP
| 4,736 |
Administration Fee. Pursuant to an Administrative Services Agreement, DIMA provides most administrative services to the Series. For all services provided under the Administrative Services Agreement, each Portfolio pays the Advisor an annual fee ("Administration Fee") of 0.10% of each Portfolio's average daily net assets, computed and accrued daily and payable monthly. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Advisor received an Administration Fee as follows:
Portfolio | Total Aggregated ($) | Unpaid at December 31, 2007 ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
| 223,979 | 19,462 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 285,358 | 19,479 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 1,150,671 | 92,808 |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 353,795 | 27,347 |
DWS International VIP
| 756,054 | 62,378 |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 112,083 | 8,980 |
Service Provider Fees. DWS Scudder Investments Service Company ("DWS-SISC"), an affiliate of the Advisor, is the transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent for the Series. Pursuant to a sub-transfer agency agreement between DWS-SISC and DST Systems, Inc. ("DST"), DWS-SISC has delegated certain transfer agent, dividend-paying agent and shareholder service agent functions to DST. DWS-SISC compensates DST out of the shareholder servicing fee it receives from each Portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the amounts charged to the Portfolios by DWS-SISC were as follows:
Portfolio | Total Aggregated ($) | Waived ($) | Unpaid at December 31, 2007 ($) |
DWS Bond VIP Class A
| 816 | — | 129 |
DWS Bond VIP Class B
| 82 | — | 23 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP Class A
| 732 | — | 121 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP Class B
| 208 | 208 | — |
DWS Capital Growth VIP Class A
| 764 | 764 | — |
DWS Capital Growth VIP Class B
| 187 | 187 | — |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class A
| 667 | 667 | — |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP Class B
| 234 | — | 59 |
DWS International VIP Class A
| 1,173 | — | 276 |
DWS International VIP Class B
| 320 | 320 | — |
DWS Health Care VIP Class A
| 308 | — | 66 |
DWS Health Care VIP Class B
| 195 | — | 43 |
DWS Scudder Distributors, Inc. ("DWS-SDI"), also an affiliate of the Advisor, is the Series' Distributor. In accordance with the Master Distribution Plan, DWS-SDI receives 12b-1 fees of 0.25% of average daily net assets of Class B shares. Pursuant to the Master Distribution Plan, DWS-SDI remits these fees to the Participating Insurance Companies for various costs incurred or paid by these companies in connection with marketing and distribution of Class B shares. These fees are detailed in each Portfolio's Statement of Operations.
Typesetting and Filing Service Fees. Under an agreement with DIMA, DIMA is compensated for providing typesetting and certain regulatory filing services to the Portfolios. For the year ended December 31, 2007, the amount charged to the Portfolios by DIMA included in the Statement of Operations under "reports to shareholders" was as follows:
Portfolio | Total Aggregated ($) | Unpaid at December 31, 2007 ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
| 11,864 | 6,436 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 7,734 | 2,490 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 8,064 | 3,694 |
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
| 7,024 | 1,971 |
DWS International VIP
| 7,496 | 2,489 |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 9,442 | 3,602 |
Trustees' Fees and Expenses. As compensation for his or her services, each Independent Trustee receives an aggregated annual fee, plus a fee for each meeting attended (plus reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with his or her attendance at board and committee meetings) from each Portfolio in the Series for which he or she serves. In addition, the Chairperson of the Board and the Chairperson of each committee of the Board receive additional compensation for their services. Payment of such fees and expenses is allocated among all such Portfolios described above in direct proportion to their relative net assets.
Cash Management QP Trust. Pursuant to an Exemptive Order issued by the SEC, the Series may invest in the Cash Management QP Trust (the ``QP Trust''), and other affiliated funds managed by the Advisor. The QP Trust seeks to provide as high a level of current income as is consistent with the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity. The QP Trust does not pay the Advisor a management fee for the affiliated funds' investments in the QP Trust.
D. Investing in Emerging Markets
The DWS Bond VIP, DWS Global Opportunities VIP, DWS International VIP and DWS Health Care VIP may invest in emerging markets. Investing in emerging markets may involve special risks and considerations not typically associated with investing in the United States of America. These risks include revaluation of currencies, high rates of inflation, repatriation restrictions on income and capital, and future adverse political, social and economic developments. Moreover, securities issued in these markets may be less liquid, subject to government ownership controls or delayed settlements and may have prices more volatile than those of comparable securities of issuers in the United States of America.
E. Fee Reductions
DWS Bond VIP, DWS Growth & Income VIP, DWS Capital Growth VIP and DWS Health Care VIP have entered into an arrangement with their custodian whereby credits realized as a result of uninvested cash balances are used to reduce a portion of the custodian expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the custodian fees were reduced as follows:
Portfolio | Custody Credits ($) |
DWS Bond VIP
| 238 |
DWS Growth & Income VIP
| 33 |
DWS Capital Growth VIP
| 727 |
DWS Health Care VIP
| 197 |
F. Ownership of the Portfolios
At the end of the period, the beneficial ownership in the Portfolios was as follows:
DWS Bond VIP: One participating insurance company was an owner of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, owning 64%. One participating insurance company was an owner of record owning 100% of the total outstanding Class B shares of the Portfolio.
DWS Growth & Income VIP: Three participating insurance companies were owners of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, each owning 31%, 31% and 13%. Two participating insurance companies were owners of record, each owning 76% and 22% of the total outstanding Class B shares of the Portfolio.
DWS Capital Growth VIP: Three participating insurance companies were owners of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, each owning 37%, 28% and 12%. One participating insurance company was an owner of record, owning 96% of the total outstanding Class B shares of the Portfolio.
DWS Global Opportunities VIP: Three participating insurance companies were owners of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, each owning 59%, 17% and 10%. Two participating insurance companies were owners of record, each owning 61% and 37% of the total outstanding Class B shares of the Portfolio.
DWS International VIP: Two participating insurance companies were owners of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, each owning 33% and 20%. One participating insurance company was an owner of record, owning 93% of the total outstanding Class B shares of the Portfolio.
DWS Health Care VIP: Two participating insurance companies were owners of record of 10% or more of the total outstanding Class A shares of the Portfolio, each owning 75% and 19%. One participating insurance company was an owner of record, owning 100% of the total outstanding Class B shares of the Portfolio.
G. Line of Credit
The Series and other affiliated funds (the "Participants") share in a $750 million revolving credit facility administered by JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. for temporary or emergency purposes, including the meeting of redemption requests that otherwise might require the untimely disposition of securities. The Participants are charged an annual commitment fee which is allocated, based upon net assets, among each of the Participants. Interest is calculated at the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.35 percent. Each Portfolio may borrow up to a maximum of 33 percent of its net assets under the agreement.
At December 31, 2007, DWS International VIP had a $1,375,000 outstanding loan. Interest expense incurred on the borrowing was $19,580 for the year ended December 31, 2007. The average dollar amount of the borrowings was $1,558,824, the weighted average interest rate on these borrowings was 5.32% and the Portfolio had a loan outstanding for fifty-one days throughout the period.
H. Acquisition of Assets
On December 8, 2006, the DWS Growth & Income VIP acquired all of the net assets of DWS Large Cap Core VIP (formerly DWS Mercury Large Cap Core VIP) pursuant to a plan of reorganization approved by shareholders on October 31, 2006. The acquisition was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of 508,928 Class B shares of the DWS Large Cap Core VIP, for 509,730 Class B shares of DWS Growth & Income VIP outstanding on December 8, 2006. DWS Large Cap Core VIP's net assets at that date of $5,500,068, including $177,549 of net unrealized appreciation, were combined with those of the DWS Growth & Income VIP. The aggregate net assets of the DWS Growth & Income VIP immediately before the acquisition were $325,496,689. The combined net assets of the DWS Growth & Income VIP immediately following the acquisition were $330,996,757.
On December 8, 2006, the DWS Capital Growth VIP acquired all of the net assets of DWS All Cap Growth VIP (formerly DWS Legg Mason Aggressive Growth VIP), DWS Oak Strategic Equity VIP and DWS Janus Growth Opportunities VIP, pursuant to a plan of reorganization approved by shareholders on October 31, 2006. The acquisition was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of 5,327,555 Class A shares and 1,045,108 Class B shares of the DWS All Cap Growth VIP, 6,755,871 Class A shares and 2,803,513 Class B shares of the DWS Oak Strategic Equity VIP and 14,026,288 Class A shares and 1,103,968 Class B shares of the DWS Janus Growth Opportunities VIP, respectively, for 2,512,311 Class A shares and 485,020 Class B shares, 2,559,770 Class A shares and 1,051,664 Class B shares and 6,451,019 Class A shares and 503,788 of Class B shares of the DWS Capital Growth VIP, respectively, outstanding on December 8, 2006. DWS All Cap Growth VIP, DWS Oak Strategic Equity VIP and DWS Janus Growth Opportunities VIP's net assets at that date of $54,782,162, $65,971,466 and $127,170,308, respectively, including $1,437,117, $1,710,783 and $12,337,292, respectively, of net unrealized appreciation, were combined with those of the DWS Capital Growth VIP. The aggregate net assets of the DWS Capital Growth VIP immediately before the acquisition were $1,004,374,949. The combined net assets of the DWS Capital Growth VIP immediately following the acquisition were $1,252,298,885.
On December 8, 2006, the DWS International VIP acquired all of the net assets of DWS Templeton Foreign Value VIP pursuant to a plan of reorganization approved by shareholders on October 31, 2006. The acquisition was accomplished by a tax-free exchange of 1,450,307 Class A shares and 662,235 Class B shares of the DWS Templeton Foreign Value VIP, respectively, for 1,133,856 Class A shares and 519,174 Class B shares of DWS International VIP, respectively, outstanding on December 8, 2006. DWS Templeton Foreign Value VIP's net assets at that date of $21,601,430, including $761,119 of net unrealized appreciation, were combined with those of the DWS International VIP. The aggregate net assets of the DWS International VIP immediately before the acquisition were $717,923,854. The combined net assets of the DWS International VIP immediately following the acquisition were $739,525,284.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Trustees and Shareholders of DWS Variable Series I:
In our opinion, the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the investment portfolios, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the six Portfolios (identified in Note A) of DWS Variable Series I (the "Series") at December 31, 2007 and the results of each of their operations, the changes in each of their net assets, and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial statements") are the responsibility of the Series' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at December 31, 2007 by correspondence with the custodians and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Boston, Massachusetts PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
February 20, 2008
Tax Information (Unaudited)
DWS Global Opportunities VIP, DWS Growth & Income VIP and DWS Health Care VIP paid distributions of $1.30, $0.15 and $0.87 per share, respectively, from net long-term capital gains during its year ended December 31, 2007, of which 100% represents 15% rate gains.
Pursuant to Section 852 of the Internal Revenue Code, DWS Growth & Income VIP, DWS Global Opportunities VIP, DWS International VIP and DWS Health Care VIP designate approximately $28,845,000, $44,063,500, $105,320,000 and $13,836,000, respectively, as capital gain dividends for its year ended December 31, 2007, of which 100% represents 15% rate gains.
For corporate shareholders of DWS Growth & Income VIP and DWS Capital Growth VIP, 100% of their respective income dividends paid during the Portfolios' fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 qualified for the dividends received deduction.
DWS Global Opportunities VIP and DWS International VIP paid foreign taxes of $199,295 and $1,208,335, respectively, and earned $992,552 and $8,523,124, respectively, of foreign source income during the year ended December 31, 2007. Pursuant to Section 853 of the Internal Revenue Code, DWS Global Opportunities VIP and DWS International VIP designate $0.01 and $0.03 per share, respectively, as foreign taxes paid and $0.06 and $0.18 per share, respectively, as income earned from foreign sources for the year ended December 31, 2007.
For federal income tax purposes, DWS Capital Growth VIP and DWS International VIP designate $415,000 and $20,494,000, respectively, or the maximum amount allowable under tax law, as qualified dividend income.
Please consult a tax advisor if you have questions about federal or state income tax laws, or on how to prepare your tax returns. If you have specific questions about your account, please call (800) 728-3337.
Proxy Voting
A description of the Series' policies and procedures for voting proxies for portfolio securities and information about how the Series voted proxies related to its portfolio securities during the 12-month period ended June 30 is available on our Web site — www.dws-scudder.com (click on "proxy voting"at the bottom of the page) — or on the SEC's Web site — www.sec.gov. To obtain a written copy of the Series' policies and procedures without charge, upon request, call us toll free at (800) 621-1048.
Investment Management Agreement Approval
DWS Bond VIP
The Portfolio's Trustees approved the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement with DIMA, sub-advisory agreement between DIMA and Aberdeen Asset Management, Inc. ("AAMI") and the sub-sub-advisory agreement between AAMI and Aberdeen Asset Management Investment Services Limited ("Aberdeen IS") in September 2007.
In terms of the process that the Trustees followed prior to approving the agreements, shareholders should know that:
At the present time, all but one of your Portfolio's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. In connection with reviewing the Portfolio's investment management agreement, the Trustees also review the terms of the Portfolio's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administration agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
In connection with the Board's 2007 contract review, the Board formed a special committee to facilitate careful review of the funds' contractual arrangements. After reviewing the Portfolio's arrangements, that committee recommended that the Board vote to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's investment management agreement and sub-advisory agreement.
The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by two consultants, including the Portfolio's independent fee consultant, in the course of their 2007 review of the Portfolio's contractual arrangements. In particular, the Trustees considered the report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations.
The sub-advisory fees paid to AAMI and Aberdeen IS are paid by DIMA out of its fee and not directly by the Portfolio.
The Trustees believe that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interest of shareholders. As you may know, DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Trustees believe that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
Shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, but the Portfolio's Trustees consider these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's, AAMI's and Aberdeen IS's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
In determining to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement and sub-advisory agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believes relevant to the interests of Portfolio shareholders, including:
The investment management fee schedule for the Portfolio, including (i) comparative information provided by Lipper regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds and (ii) fee rates paid to DIMA by similar funds and institutional accounts advised by DIMA (if any.) With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Trustees noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Portfolio were lower than the median (2nd quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006). The Board gave a lesser weight to fees paid by similar institutional accounts advised by DIMA, in light of the material differences in the scope of services provided to mutual funds as compared to those provided to institutional accounts. Taking into account the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fee schedule in effect for the Portfolio represents reasonable compensation in light of the nature, extent and quality of the investment services being provided to the Portfolio.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Portfolio grows. In this regard, the Board noted that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between Portfolio shareholders and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Portfolio at current asset levels.
The total operating expenses of the Portfolio. In this regard, the Board noted that the total (net) operating expenses of the Portfolio (Class A shares) are expected to be higher than the median (3rd quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006, and in each case analyzing Class A expenses less any applicable distribution and/or service plan expenses). The Board considered the expenses of this class to be representative for purposes of evaluating other classes of shares. The Board also considered how the Portfolio's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitations agreed to by DIMA helped to ensure that the Portfolio's total (net) operating expenses would be competitive relative to the applicable Lipper universe.
The investment performance of the Portfolio and DIMA, both absolute and relative to various benchmarks and industry peer groups. The Board noted that for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006, the Portfolio's performance (Class A shares) was in the 1st quartile, 1st quartile and 2nd quartile, respectively, of the applicable Lipper universe. The Board also observed that the Portfolio has outperformed its benchmark in each of the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006. The Board recognized that DIMA has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes in recent years in an effort to improve long-term performance.
The nature, extent and quality of the advisory services provided by DIMA, AAMI and Aberdeen IS. The Board considered extensive information regarding DIMA, including DIMA's personnel (including particularly those personnel with responsibilities for providing services to the Portfolio), resources, policies and investment processes. The Board also considered the terms of the current investment management agreement and the sub-advisory agreement, including the scope of services provided under the agreements. In this regard, the Board concluded that the quality and range of services provided by DIMA, AAMI and Aberdeen IS have benefited and should continue to benefit the Portfolio and its shareholders.
The costs of the services to, and profits realized by, DIMA and its affiliates from their relationships with the Portfolio. The Board reviewed information concerning the costs incurred and profits realized by DIMA during 2006 from providing investment management services to the Portfolio (and, separately, to the entire DWS Scudder fund complex), and reviewed with DIMA the cost allocation methodology used to determine DIMA's profitability. In analyzing DIMA's costs and profits, the Board also reviewed the fees paid to and services provided by DIMA and its affiliates with respect to administrative services, transfer agent services, shareholder servicing and distribution (including fees paid pursuant to 12b-1 plans), as well as information regarding other possible benefits derived by DIMA and its affiliates as a result of DIMA's relationship with the Portfolio. As part of this review, the Board considered information provided by an independent accounting firm engaged to review DIMA's cost allocation methodology and calculations. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule represented reasonable compensation in light of the costs incurred by DIMA and its affiliates in providing services to the Portfolio. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Scudder fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
The practices of DIMA, AAMI and Aberdeen IS regarding the selection and compensation of brokers and dealers executing portfolio transactions for the Portfolio. The Board considered that a portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to affiliates of DIMA, AAMI or Aberdeen IS, subject to compliance with applicable SEC rules. The Board also considered that, subject to ongoing review by the Board, a limited portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to brokers who acquire (and provide to DIMA and its affiliates) research services from third parties that are generally useful to DIMA and its affiliates in managing client portfolios. The Board indicated that it would continue to monitor the allocation of the Portfolio's brokerage to ensure that the principle of "best price and execution" remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
DIMA's commitment to and record of compliance, including its written compliance policies and procedures. In this regard, the Board considered DIMA's commitment to indemnify the Portfolio against any costs and liabilities related to lawsuits or regulatory actions arising from allegations regarding market timing, revenue sharing, fund valuation or other subjects arising from or relating to pending regulatory inquiries. The Board also considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Deutsche Bank's commitment to its US mutual fund business. The Board considered recent and ongoing efforts by Deutsche Bank to restructure its US mutual fund business to improve efficiency and competitiveness and to reduce compliance and operational risk. The Board considered assurances received from Deutsche Bank that it would commit the resources necessary to maintain high-quality services to the Portfolio and its shareholders. The Board also considered Deutsche Bank's strategic plans for its US mutual fund business, the potential benefits to Portfolio shareholders and Deutsche Bank's management of one of Europe's most successful fund groups.
Based on all of the foregoing, the Board determined to continue the Portfolio's current investment management agreement and the sub-advisory agreements, and concluded that the continuation of such agreements was in the best interests of the Portfolio's shareholders.
In reaching this conclusion the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, many of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the current agreements.
DWS Growth & Income VIP
The Portfolio's Trustees approved the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement with DIMA in September 2007.
In terms of the process that the Trustees followed prior to approving the agreement, shareholders should know that:
At the present time, all but one of your Portfolio's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. In connection with reviewing the Portfolio's investment management agreement, the Trustees also review the terms of the Portfolio's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administration agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
In connection with the Board's 2007 contract review, the Board formed a special committee to facilitate careful review of the funds' contractual arrangements. After reviewing the Portfolio's arrangements, that committee recommended that the Board vote to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's investment management agreement.
The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by two consultants, including the Portfolio's independent fee consultant, in the course of their 2007 review of the Portfolio's contractual arrangements. In particular, the Trustees considered the report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations.
The Trustees believe that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interest of shareholders. As you may know, DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Trustees believe that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
Shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, but the Portfolio's Trustees consider these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
In determining to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believes relevant to the interests of Portfolio shareholders, including:
The investment management fee schedule for the Portfolio, including (i) comparative information provided by Lipper regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds and (ii) fee rates paid to DIMA by similar funds and institutional accounts advised by DIMA (if any). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Trustees noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Portfolio were lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006). The Board gave a lesser weight to fees paid by similar institutional accounts advised by DIMA, in light of the material differences in the scope of services provided to mutual funds as compared to those provided to institutional accounts. Taking into account the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fee schedule in effect for the Portfolio represents reasonable compensation in light of the nature, extent and quality of the investment services being provided to the Portfolio.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Portfolio grows. In this regard, the Board noted that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between Portfolio shareholders and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Portfolio at current asset levels.
The total operating expenses of the Portfolio. In this regard, the Board noted that the total (net) operating expenses of the Portfolio (Class A shares) are expected to be lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006, and in each case analyzing Class A expenses less any applicable distribution and/or service plan expenses). The Board considered the expenses of this class to be representative for purposes of evaluating other classes of shares. The Board also considered how the Portfolio's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitations agreed to by DIMA helped to ensure that the Portfolio's total (net) operating expenses would be competitive relative to the applicable Lipper universe.
The investment performance of the Portfolio and DIMA, both absolute and relative to various benchmarks and industry peer groups. The Board noted that for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006, the Portfolio's performance (Class A shares) was in the 3rd quartile, 2nd quartile and 3rd quartile, respectively, of the applicable Lipper universe. The Board also observed that the Portfolio has underperformed its benchmark in the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006. The Board recognized that DIMA has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes in recent years in an effort to improve long-term performance.
The nature, extent and quality of the advisory services provided by DIMA. The Board considered extensive information regarding DIMA, including DIMA's personnel (including particularly those personnel with responsibilities for providing services to the Portfolio), resources, policies and investment processes. The Board also considered the terms of the current investment management agreement, including the scope of services provided under the agreement. In this regard, the Board concluded that the quality and range of services provided by DIMA have benefited and should continue to benefit the Portfolio and its shareholders.
The costs of the services to, and profits realized by, DIMA and its affiliates from their relationships with the Portfolio. The Board reviewed information concerning the costs incurred and profits realized by DIMA during 2006 from providing investment management services to the Portfolio (and, separately, to the entire DWS Scudder fund complex), and reviewed with DIMA the cost allocation methodology used to determine DIMA's profitability. In analyzing DIMA's costs and profits, the Board also reviewed the fees paid to and services provided by DIMA and its affiliates with respect to administrative services, transfer agent services, shareholder servicing and distribution (including fees paid pursuant to 12b-1 plans), as well as information regarding other possible benefits derived by DIMA and its affiliates as a result of DIMA's relationship with the Portfolio. As part of this review, the Board considered information provided by an independent accounting firm engaged to review DIMA's cost allocation methodology and calculations. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule represented reasonable compensation in light of the costs incurred by DIMA and its affiliates in providing services to the Portfolio. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Scudder fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
The practices of DIMA regarding the selection and compensation of brokers and dealers executing portfolio transactions for the Portfolio. The Board considered that a portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to affiliates of DIMA, subject to compliance with applicable SEC rules. The Board also considered that, subject to ongoing review by the Board, a limited portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to brokers who acquire (and provide to DIMA and its affiliates) research services from third parties that are generally useful to DIMA and its affiliates in managing client portfolios. The Board indicated that it would continue to monitor the allocation of the Portfolio's brokerage to ensure that the principle of "best price and execution" remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
DIMA's commitment to and record of compliance, including its written compliance policies and procedures. In this regard, the Board considered DIMA's commitment to indemnify the Portfolio against any costs and liabilities related to lawsuits or regulatory actions arising from allegations regarding market timing, revenue sharing, fund valuation or other subjects arising from or relating to pending regulatory inquiries. The Board also considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Deutsche Bank's commitment to its US mutual fund business. The Board considered recent and ongoing efforts by Deutsche Bank to restructure its US mutual fund business to improve efficiency and competitiveness and to reduce compliance and operational risk. The Board considered assurances received from Deutsche Bank that it would commit the resources necessary to maintain high-quality services to the Portfolio and its shareholders. The Board also considered Deutsche Bank's strategic plans for its US mutual fund business, the potential benefits to Portfolio shareholders and Deutsche Bank's management of one of Europe's most successful fund groups.
Based on all of the foregoing, the Board determined to continue the Portfolio's current investment management agreement, and concluded that the continuation of such agreement was in the best interests of the Portfolio's shareholders.
In reaching this conclusion the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, many of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the current agreement.
DWS Capital Growth VIP
The Portfolio's Trustees approved the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement with DIMA in September 2007.
In terms of the process that the Trustees followed prior to approving the agreement, shareholders should know that:
At the present time, all but one of your Portfolio's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. In connection with reviewing the Portfolio's investment management agreement, the Trustees also review the terms of the Portfolio's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administration agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
In connection with the Board's 2007 contract review, the Board formed a special committee to facilitate careful review of the funds' contractual arrangements. After reviewing the Portfolio's arrangements, that committee recommended that the Board vote to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's investment management agreement.
The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by two consultants, including the Portfolio's independent fee consultant, in the course of their 2007 review of the Portfolio's contractual arrangements. In particular, the Trustees considered the report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations.
The Trustees believe that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interest of shareholders. As you may know, DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Trustees believe that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
Shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, but the Portfolio's Trustees consider these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
In determining to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believes relevant to the interests of Portfolio shareholders, including:
The investment management fee schedule for the Portfolio, including (i) comparative information provided by Lipper regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds and (ii) fee rates paid to DIMA by similar funds and institutional accounts advised by DIMA (if any). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Trustees noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Portfolio were lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006). The Board gave a lesser weight to fees paid by similar institutional accounts advised by DIMA, in light of the material differences in the scope of services provided to mutual funds as compared to those provided to institutional accounts. Taking into account the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fee schedule in effect for the Portfolio represents reasonable compensation in light of the nature, extent and quality of the investment services being provided to the Portfolio.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Portfolio grows. In this regard, the Board noted that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between Portfolio shareholders and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Portfolio at current asset levels.
The total operating expenses of the Portfolio. In this regard, the Board noted that the total (net) operating expenses of the Portfolio (Class A shares) are expected to be lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006, and in each case analyzing Class A expenses less any applicable distribution and/or service plan expenses). The Board considered the expenses of this class to be representative for purposes of evaluating other classes of shares. The Board also considered how the Portfolio's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitations agreed to by DIMA helped to ensure that the Portfolio's total (net) operating expenses would be competitive relative to the applicable Lipper universe.
The investment performance of the Portfolio and DIMA, both absolute and relative to various benchmarks and industry peer groups. The Board noted that for each of the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006, the Portfolio's performance (Class A shares) was in the 2nd quartile of the applicable Lipper universe. The Board also observed that the Portfolio has underperformed its benchmark in the each of the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006. The Board recognized that DIMA has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes in recent years in an effort to improve long-term performance.
The nature, extent and quality of the advisory services provided by DIMA. The Board considered extensive information regarding DIMA, including DIMA's personnel (including particularly those personnel with responsibilities for providing services to the Portfolio), resources, policies and investment processes. The Board also considered the terms of the current investment management agreement, including the scope of services provided under the agreement. In this regard, the Board concluded that the quality and range of services provided by DIMA have benefited and should continue to benefit the Portfolio and its shareholders.
The costs of the services to, and profits realized by, DIMA and its affiliates from their relationships with the Portfolio. The Board reviewed information concerning the costs incurred and profits realized by DIMA during 2006 from providing investment management services to the Portfolio (and, separately, to the entire DWS Scudder fund complex), and reviewed with DIMA the cost allocation methodology used to determine DIMA's profitability. In analyzing DIMA's costs and profits, the Board also reviewed the fees paid to and services provided by DIMA and its affiliates with respect to administrative services, transfer agent services, shareholder servicing and distribution (including fees paid pursuant to 12b-1 plans), as well as information regarding other possible benefits derived by DIMA and its affiliates as a result of DIMA's relationship with the Portfolio. As part of this review, the Board considered information provided by an independent accounting firm engaged to review DIMA's cost allocation methodology and calculations. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule represented reasonable compensation in light of the costs incurred by DIMA and its affiliates in providing services to the Portfolio. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Scudder fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
The practices of DIMA regarding the selection and compensation of brokers and dealers executing portfolio transactions for the Portfolio. The Board considered that a portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to affiliates of DIMA, subject to compliance with applicable SEC rules. The Board also considered that, subject to ongoing review by the Board, a limited portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to brokers who acquire (and provide to DIMA and its affiliates) research services from third parties that are generally useful to DIMA and its affiliates in managing client portfolios. The Board indicated that it would continue to monitor the allocation of the Portfolio's brokerage to ensure that the principle of "best price and execution" remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
DIMA's commitment to and record of compliance, including its written compliance policies and procedures. In this regard, the Board considered DIMA's commitment to indemnify the Portfolio against any costs and liabilities related to lawsuits or regulatory actions arising from allegations regarding market timing, revenue sharing, fund valuation or other subjects arising from or relating to pending regulatory inquiries. The Board also considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Deutsche Bank's commitment to its US mutual fund business. The Board considered recent and ongoing efforts by Deutsche Bank to restructure its US mutual fund business to improve efficiency and competitiveness and to reduce compliance and operational risk. The Board considered assurances received from Deutsche Bank that it would commit the resources necessary to maintain high-quality services to the Portfolio and its shareholders. The Board also considered Deutsche Bank's strategic plans for its US mutual fund business, the potential benefits to Portfolio shareholders and Deutsche Bank's management of one of Europe's most successful fund groups.
Based on all of the foregoing, the Board determined to continue the Portfolio's current investment management agreement, and concluded that the continuation of such agreement was in the best interests of the Portfolio's shareholders.
In reaching this conclusion the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, many of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the current agreement.
DWS Global Opportunities VIP
The Portfolio's Trustees approved the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement with DIMA in September 2007.
In terms of the process that the Trustees followed prior to approving the agreement, shareholders should know that:
At the present time, all but one of your Portfolio's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. In connection with reviewing the Portfolio's investment management agreement, the Trustees also review the terms of the Portfolio's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administration agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
In connection with the Board's 2007 contract review, the Board formed a special committee to facilitate careful review of the funds' contractual arrangements. After reviewing the Portfolio's arrangements, that committee recommended that the Board vote to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's investment management agreement.
The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by two consultants, including the Portfolio's independent fee consultant, in the course of their 2007 review of the Portfolio's contractual arrangements. In particular, the Trustees considered the report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations.
The Trustees believe that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interest of shareholders. As you may know, DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Trustees believe that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
Shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, but the Portfolio's Trustees consider these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
In determining to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believes relevant to the interests of Portfolio shareholders, including:
The investment management fee schedule for the Portfolio, including (i) comparative information provided by Lipper regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds and (ii) fee rates paid to DIMA by similar funds and institutional accounts advised by DIMA (if any). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Trustees noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Portfolio were higher than the median (4th quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006). The Board gave a lesser weight to fees paid by similar institutional accounts advised by DIMA, in light of the material differences in the scope of services provided to mutual funds as compared to those provided to institutional accounts. Taking into account the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fee schedule in effect for the Portfolio represents reasonable compensation in light of the nature, extent and quality of the investment services being provided to the Portfolio.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Portfolio grows. In this regard, the Board noted that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between Portfolio shareholders and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Portfolio at current asset levels.
The total operating expenses of the Portfolio. In this regard, the Board noted that the total (net) operating expenses of the Portfolio (Class A shares) are expected to be higher than the median (3rd quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006, and in each case analyzing Class A expenses less any applicable distribution and/or service plan expenses). The Board considered the expenses of this class to be representative for purposes of evaluating other classes of shares. The Board also considered how the Portfolio's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitations agreed to by DIMA helped to ensure that the Portfolio's total (net) operating expenses would be competitive relative to the applicable Lipper universe.
The investment performance of the Portfolio and DIMA, both absolute and relative to various benchmarks and industry peer groups. The Board noted that for each of the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006, the Portfolio's performance (Class A shares) was in the 1st quartile of the applicable Lipper universe. The Board also observed that the Portfolio has outperformed its benchmark in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006 and has underperformed its benchmark in the one- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006. The Board recognized that DIMA has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes in recent years in an effort to improve long-term performance.
The nature, extent and quality of the advisory services provided by DIMA. The Board considered extensive information regarding DIMA, including DIMA's personnel (including particularly those personnel with responsibilities for providing services to the Portfolio), resources, policies and investment processes. The Board also considered the terms of the current investment management agreement, including the scope of services provided under the agreement. In this regard, the Board concluded that the quality and range of services provided by DIMA have benefited and should continue to benefit the Portfolio and its shareholders.
The costs of the services to, and profits realized by, DIMA and its affiliates from their relationships with the Portfolio. The Board reviewed information concerning the costs incurred and profits realized by DIMA during 2006 from providing investment management services to the Portfolio (and, separately, to the entire DWS Scudder fund complex), and reviewed with DIMA the cost allocation methodology used to determine DIMA's profitability. In analyzing DIMA's costs and profits, the Board also reviewed the fees paid to and services provided by DIMA and its affiliates with respect to administrative services, transfer agent services, shareholder servicing and distribution (including fees paid pursuant to 12b-1 plans), as well as information regarding other possible benefits derived by DIMA and its affiliates as a result of DIMA's relationship with the Portfolio. As part of this review, the Board considered information provided by an independent accounting firm engaged to review DIMA's cost allocation methodology and calculations. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule represented reasonable compensation in light of the costs incurred by DIMA and its affiliates in providing services to the Portfolio. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Scudder fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
The practices of DIMA regarding the selection and compensation of brokers and dealers executing portfolio transactions for the Portfolio. The Board considered that a portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to affiliates of DIMA, subject to compliance with applicable SEC rules. The Board also considered that, subject to ongoing review by the Board, a limited portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to brokers who acquire (and provide to DIMA and its affiliates) research services from third parties that are generally useful to DIMA and its affiliates in managing client portfolios. The Board indicated that it would continue to monitor the allocation of the Portfolio's brokerage to ensure that the principle of "best price and execution" remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
DIMA's commitment to and record of compliance, including its written compliance policies and procedures. In this regard, the Board considered DIMA's commitment to indemnify the Portfolio against any costs and liabilities related to lawsuits or regulatory actions arising from allegations regarding market timing, revenue sharing, fund valuation or other subjects arising from or relating to pending regulatory inquiries. The Board also considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Deutsche Bank's commitment to its US mutual fund business. The Board considered recent and ongoing efforts by Deutsche Bank to restructure its US mutual fund business to improve efficiency and competitiveness and to reduce compliance and operational risk. The Board considered assurances received from Deutsche Bank that it would commit the resources necessary to maintain high-quality services to the Portfolio and its shareholders. The Board also considered Deutsche Bank's strategic plans for its US mutual fund business, the potential benefits to Portfolio shareholders and Deutsche Bank's management of one of Europe's most successful fund groups.
Based on all of the foregoing, the Board determined to continue the Portfolio's current investment management agreement, and concluded that the continuation of such agreement was in the best interests of the Portfolio's shareholders.
In reaching this conclusion the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, many of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the current agreement.
DWS International VIP
The Portfolio's Trustees approved the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement with DIMA in September 2007.
In terms of the process that the Trustees followed prior to approving the agreement, shareholders should know that:
At the present time, all but one of your Portfolio's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. In connection with reviewing the Portfolio's investment management agreement, the Trustees also review the terms of the Portfolio's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administration agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
In connection with the Board's 2007 contract review, the Board formed a special committee to facilitate careful review of the funds' contractual arrangements. After reviewing the Portfolio's arrangements, that committee recommended that the Board vote to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's investment management agreement.
The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by two consultants, including the Portfolio's independent fee consultant, in the course of their 2007 review of the Portfolio's contractual arrangements. In particular, the Trustees considered the report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations.
The Trustees believe that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interest of shareholders. As you may know, DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Trustees believe that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
Shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, but the Portfolio's Trustees consider these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
In determining to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believes relevant to the interests of Portfolio shareholders, including:
The investment management fee schedule for the Portfolio, including (i) comparative information provided by Lipper regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds and (ii) fee rates paid to DIMA by similar funds and institutional accounts advised by DIMA (if any). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Trustees noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Portfolio were higher than the median (3rd quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006). The Board gave a lesser weight to fees paid by similar institutional accounts advised by DIMA, in light of the material differences in the scope of services provided to mutual funds as compared to those provided to institutional accounts. Taking into account the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fee schedule in effect for the Portfolio represents reasonable compensation in light of the nature, extent and quality of the investment services being provided to the Portfolio.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Portfolio grows. In this regard, the Board noted that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between Portfolio shareholders and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Portfolio at current asset levels.
The total operating expenses of the Portfolio. In this regard, the Board noted that the total (net) operating expenses of the Portfolio (Class A shares) are expected to be lower than the median (2nd quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006, and in each case analyzing Class A expenses less any applicable distribution and/or service plan expenses). The Board considered the expenses of this class to be representative for purposes of evaluating other classes of shares. The Board also considered how the Portfolio's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size). The Board also noted that the expense limitations agreed to by DIMA helped to ensure that the Portfolio's total (net) operating expenses would be competitive relative to the applicable Lipper universe.
The investment performance of the Portfolio and DIMA, both absolute and relative to various benchmarks and industry peer groups. The Board noted that for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006, the Portfolio's performance (Class A shares) was in the 2nd quartile, 2nd quartile and 3rd quartile, respectively, of the applicable Lipper universe. The Board also observed that the Portfolio has underperformed its benchmark in each of the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006. The Board recognized that DIMA has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes in recent years in an effort to improve long-term performance.
The nature, extent and quality of the advisory services provided by DIMA. The Board considered extensive information regarding DIMA, including DIMA's personnel (including particularly those personnel with responsibilities for providing services to the Portfolio), resources, policies and investment processes. The Board also considered the terms of the current investment management agreement, including the scope of services provided under the agreement. In this regard, the Board concluded that the quality and range of services provided by DIMA have benefited and should continue to benefit the Portfolio and its shareholders.
The costs of the services to, and profits realized by, DIMA and its affiliates from their relationships with the Portfolio. The Board reviewed information concerning the costs incurred and profits realized by DIMA during 2006 from providing investment management services to the Portfolio (and, separately, to the entire DWS Scudder fund complex), and reviewed with DIMA the cost allocation methodology used to determine DIMA's profitability. In analyzing DIMA's costs and profits, the Board also reviewed the fees paid to and services provided by DIMA and its affiliates with respect to administrative services, transfer agent services, shareholder servicing and distribution (including fees paid pursuant to 12b-1 plans), as well as information regarding other possible benefits derived by DIMA and its affiliates as a result of DIMA's relationship with the Portfolio. As part of this review, the Board considered information provided by an independent accounting firm engaged to review DIMA's cost allocation methodology and calculations. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule represented reasonable compensation in light of the costs incurred by DIMA and its affiliates in providing services to the Portfolio. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Scudder fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
The practices of DIMA regarding the selection and compensation of brokers and dealers executing portfolio transactions for the Portfolio. The Board considered that a portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to affiliates of DIMA, subject to compliance with applicable SEC rules. The Board also considered that, subject to ongoing review by the Board, a limited portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to brokers who acquire (and provide to DIMA and its affiliates) research services from third parties that are generally useful to DIMA and its affiliates in managing client portfolios. The Board indicated that it would continue to monitor the allocation of the Portfolio's brokerage to ensure that the principle of "best price and execution" remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
DIMA's commitment to and record of compliance, including its written compliance policies and procedures. In this regard, the Board considered DIMA's commitment to indemnify the Portfolio against any costs and liabilities related to lawsuits or regulatory actions arising from allegations regarding market timing, revenue sharing, fund valuation or other subjects arising from or relating to pending regulatory inquiries. The Board also considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Deutsche Bank's commitment to its US mutual fund business. The Board considered recent and ongoing efforts by Deutsche Bank to restructure its US mutual fund business to improve efficiency and competitiveness and to reduce compliance and operational risk. The Board considered assurances received from Deutsche Bank that it would commit the resources necessary to maintain high-quality services to the Portfolio and its shareholders. The Board also considered Deutsche Bank's strategic plans for its US mutual fund business, the potential benefits to Portfolio shareholders and Deutsche Bank's management of one of Europe's most successful fund groups.
Based on all of the foregoing, the Board determined to continue the Portfolio's current investment management agreement, and concluded that the continuation of such agreement was in the best interests of the Portfolio's shareholders.
In reaching this conclusion the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, many of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the current agreement.
DWS Health Care VIP
The Portfolio's Trustees approved the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement with DIMA in September 2007.
In terms of the process that the Trustees followed prior to approving the agreement, shareholders should know that:
At the present time, all but one of your Portfolio's Trustees are independent of DIMA and its affiliates.
The Trustees meet frequently to discuss fund matters. Each year, the Trustees dedicate part or all of several meetings to contract review matters. In connection with reviewing the Portfolio's investment management agreement, the Trustees also review the terms of the Portfolio's Rule 12b-1 plan, distribution agreement, administration agreement, transfer agency agreement and other material service agreements.
In connection with the Board's 2007 contract review, the Board formed a special committee to facilitate careful review of the funds' contractual arrangements. After reviewing the Portfolio's arrangements, that committee recommended that the Board vote to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's investment management agreement.
The Trustees regularly meet privately with their independent counsel to discuss contract review and other matters. In addition, the Trustees were also advised by two consultants, including the Portfolio's independent fee consultant, in the course of their 2007 review of the Portfolio's contractual arrangements. In particular, the Trustees considered the report prepared by the independent fee consultant in connection with their deliberations.
The Trustees believe that a long-term relationship with a capable, conscientious advisor is in the best interest of shareholders. As you may know, DIMA is part of Deutsche Bank, a major global banking institution that is engaged in a wide range of financial services. The Trustees believe that there are significant advantages to being part of a global asset management business that offers a wide range of investing expertise and resources, including hundreds of portfolio managers and analysts with research capabilities in many countries throughout the world.
Shareholders may focus primarily on fund performance and fees, but the Portfolio's Trustees consider these and many other factors, including the quality and integrity of DIMA's personnel and such other issues as back-office operations, fund valuations, and compliance policies and procedures.
In determining to approve the continuation of the Portfolio's current investment management agreement, the Board considered all factors that it believes relevant to the interests of Portfolio shareholders, including:
The investment management fee schedule for the Portfolio, including (i) comparative information provided by Lipper regarding investment management fee rates paid to other investment advisors by similar funds and (ii) fee rates paid to DIMA by similar funds and institutional accounts advised by DIMA (if any). With respect to management fees paid to other investment advisors by similar funds, the Trustees noted that the contractual fee rates paid by the Portfolio were lower than the median (2nd quartile) of the applicable Lipper peer group (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006). The Board gave a lesser weight to fees paid by similar institutional accounts advised by DIMA, in light of the material differences in the scope of services provided to mutual funds as compared to those provided to institutional accounts. Taking into account the foregoing, the Board concluded that the fee schedule in effect for the Portfolio represents reasonable compensation in light of the nature, extent and quality of the investment services being provided to the Portfolio.
The extent to which economies of scale would be realized as the Portfolio grows. In this regard, the Board noted that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule includes fee breakpoints. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's fee schedule represents an appropriate sharing between Portfolio shareholders and DIMA of such economies of scale as may exist in the management of the Portfolio at current asset levels.
The total operating expenses of the Portfolio. In this regard, the Board noted that the total (net) operating expenses of the Portfolio (Class A shares) are expected to be lower than the median (1st quartile) of the applicable Lipper expense universe (based on Lipper data provided as of December 31, 2006, and in each case analyzing Class A expenses less any applicable distribution and/or service plan expenses). The Board considered the expenses of this class to be representative for purposes of evaluating other classes of shares. The Board also considered how the Portfolio's total (net) operating expenses compared to the total (net) operating expenses of a more customized peer group selected by Lipper (based on such factors as asset size).
The investment performance of the Portfolio and DIMA, both absolute and relative to various benchmarks and industry peer groups. The Board noted that for the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006, the Portfolio's performance (Class A shares) was in the 3rd quartile, 3rd quartile and 2nd quartile, respectively, of the applicable Lipper universe. The Board also observed that the Portfolio has outperformed its benchmark in each of the one-, three- and five-year periods ended December 31, 2006. The Board recognized that DIMA has made significant changes in its investment personnel and processes in recent years in an effort to improve long-term performance.
The nature, extent and quality of the advisory services provided by DIMA. The Board considered extensive information regarding DIMA, including DIMA's personnel (including particularly those personnel with responsibilities for providing services to the Portfolio), resources, policies and investment processes. The Board also considered the terms of the current investment management agreement, including the scope of services provided under the agreement. In this regard, the Board concluded that the quality and range of services provided by DIMA have benefited and should continue to benefit the Portfolio and its shareholders.
The costs of the services to, and profits realized by, DIMA and its affiliates from their relationships with the Portfolio. The Board reviewed information concerning the costs incurred and profits realized by DIMA during 2006 from providing investment management services to the Portfolio (and, separately, to the entire DWS Scudder fund complex), and reviewed with DIMA the cost allocation methodology used to determine DIMA's profitability. In analyzing DIMA's costs and profits, the Board also reviewed the fees paid to and services provided by DIMA and its affiliates with respect to administrative services, transfer agent services, shareholder servicing and distribution (including fees paid pursuant to 12b-1 plans), as well as information regarding other possible benefits derived by DIMA and its affiliates as a result of DIMA's relationship with the Portfolio. As part of this review, the Board considered information provided by an independent accounting firm engaged to review DIMA's cost allocation methodology and calculations. The Board concluded that the Portfolio's investment management fee schedule represented reasonable compensation in light of the costs incurred by DIMA and its affiliates in providing services to the Portfolio. The Board also reviewed information regarding the profitability of certain similar investment management firms. The Board noted that while information regarding the profitability of such firms is limited (and in some cases is not necessarily prepared on a comparable basis), DIMA and its affiliates' overall profitability with respect to the DWS Scudder fund complex (after taking into account distribution and other services provided to the funds by DIMA and its affiliates) was lower than the overall profitability levels of many comparable firms for which such data was available.
The practices of DIMA regarding the selection and compensation of brokers and dealers executing portfolio transactions for the Portfolio. The Board considered that a portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to affiliates of DIMA, subject to compliance with applicable SEC rules. The Board also considered that, subject to ongoing review by the Board, a limited portion of the Portfolio's brokerage may be allocated to brokers who acquire (and provide to DIMA and its affiliates) research services from third parties that are generally useful to DIMA and its affiliates in managing client portfolios. The Board indicated that it would continue to monitor the allocation of the Portfolio's brokerage to ensure that the principle of "best price and execution" remains paramount in the portfolio trading process.
DIMA's commitment to and record of compliance, including its written compliance policies and procedures. In this regard, the Board considered DIMA's commitment to indemnify the Portfolio against any costs and liabilities related to lawsuits or regulatory actions arising from allegations regarding market timing, revenue sharing, fund valuation or other subjects arising from or relating to pending regulatory inquiries. The Board also considered the significant attention and resources dedicated by DIMA to documenting and enhancing its compliance processes in recent years. The Board noted in particular (i) the experience and seniority of DIMA's chief compliance officer; (ii) the large number of compliance personnel who report to DIMA's chief compliance officer; and (iii) the substantial commitment of resources by DIMA and its affiliates to compliance matters.
Deutsche Bank's commitment to its US mutual fund business. The Board considered recent and ongoing efforts by Deutsche Bank to restructure its US mutual fund business to improve efficiency and competitiveness and to reduce compliance and operational risk. The Board considered assurances received from Deutsche Bank that it would commit the resources necessary to maintain high-quality services to the Portfolio and its shareholders. The Board also considered Deutsche Bank's strategic plans for its US mutual fund business, the potential benefits to Portfolio shareholders and Deutsche Bank's management of one of Europe's most successful fund groups.
Based on all of the foregoing, the Board determined to continue the Portfolio's current investment management agreement, and concluded that the continuation of such agreement was in the best interests of the Portfolio's shareholders.
In reaching this conclusion the Board did not give particular weight to any single factor identified above. The Board considered these factors over the course of numerous meetings, many of which were in executive session with only the Independent Trustees and their counsel present. It is possible that individual Trustees may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their individual decisions to approve the continuation of the current agreement.
Summary of Management Fee Evaluation by Independent Fee Consultant
October 26, 2007
Pursuant to an Order entered into by Deutsche Investment Management Americas and affiliates (collectively, "DeAM") with the Attorney General of New York, I, Thomas H. Mack, have been appointed the Independent Fee Consultant for the DWS Scudder Funds. My duties include preparing an annual written evaluation of the management fees DeAM charges the Funds, considering among other factors the management fees charged by other mutual fund companies for like services, management fees DeAM charges other clients for like services, DeAM's costs of supplying services under the management agreements and related profit margins, possible economies of scale if a Fund grows larger, and the nature and quality of DeAM's services, including fund performance. This report summarizes my evaluation for 2007, including my qualifications, the evaluation process for each of the DWS Scudder Funds, consideration of certain complex-level factors, and my conclusions.
Qualifications
For more than 30 years I have served in various professional capacities within the investment management business. I have held investment analysis and advisory positions, including securities analyst, portfolio strategist and director of investment policy with a large investment firm. I have also performed business management functions, including business development, financial management and marketing research and analysis.
Since 1991, I have been an independent consultant within the asset management industry. I have provided services to over 125 client organizations, including investment managers, mutual fund boards, product distributors and related organizations. Over the past several years I have completed a number of assignments for mutual fund boards, specifically including assisting boards with management contract renewal.
I hold a Master of Business Administration degree, with highest honors, from Harvard University; and Master of Science and Bachelor of Science (highest honors) degrees from the University of California at Berkeley. I am an independent director and audit committee financial expert for two closed-end mutual funds, serve on the board of directors of a private market research company, and have served in various leadership and financial oversight capacities with non-profit organizations.
Evaluation of Fees for each DWS Scudder Fund
My work focused primarily on evaluating, fund-by-fund, the fees charged to each of the 136 Fund portfolios in the DWS Scudder Fund family. For each Fund, I considered each of the key factors mentioned above, as well as any other relevant information. In doing so I worked closely with the Funds' Independent Directors in their annual contract renewal process, as well as in their approval of contracts for several new funds (documented separately).
In evaluating each Fund's fees, I reviewed comprehensive materials provided by or on behalf of DeAM, including expense information prepared by Lipper Analytical, comparative performance information, profitability data, manager histories, and other materials. I also accessed certain additional information from the Lipper, Strategic Insight, and Morningstar databases and drew on my industry knowledge and experience.
To facilitate evaluating this considerable body of information, I prepared for each Fund a document summarizing the key data elements in each area as well as additional analytics discussed below. This made it possible to consider each key data element in the context of the others.
In the course of contract renewal, DeAM agreed to implement a number of fee and expense adjustments requested by the Independent Directors which will favorably impact future fees and expenses, and my evaluation includes the effects of these changes.
Fees and Expenses Compared with Other Funds
The competitive fee and expense evaluation for each fund focused on two primary comparisons:
The Fund's contractual management fee (the advisory fee plus the administration fee where applicable) compared with those of a group of typically 12-15 funds in the same Lipper investment category (e.g. Large Capitalization Growth) having similar distribution arrangements and being of similar size.
The Fund's total expenses compared with a broader universe of funds from the same Lipper investment category and having similar distribution arrangements.
These two comparisons provide a view of not only the level of the fee compared with funds of similar scale but also the total expense the Fund bears for all the services it receives, in comparison with the investment choices available in the Fund's investment category and distribution channel. The principal figure-of-merit used in these comparisons was the subject Fund's percentile ranking against peers.
DeAM's Fees for Similar Services to Others
DeAM provided management fee schedules for all of its US domiciled fund and non-fund investment management accounts in any of the investment categories where there is a DWS Scudder Fund. These similar products included the other DWS Scudder Funds, non-fund pooled accounts, institutional accounts and sub-advisory accounts. Using this information, I calculated for each Fund the fee that would be charged to each similar product, at the subject Fund's asset level.
Evaluating information regarding non-fund products is difficult because there are varying levels of services required for different types of accounts, with mutual funds generally requiring considerably more regulatory and administrative types of service as well as having more frequent cash flows than other types of accounts. Also, while mutual fund fees for similar fund products can be expected to be similar, there will be some differences due to different pricing conditions in different distribution channels (e.g. retail funds versus those used in variable insurance products), differences in underlying investment processes and other factors.
Costs and Profit Margins
DeAM provided a detailed profitability analysis for each Fund. After making some adjustments so that the presentation would be more comparable to the available industry figures, I reviewed profit margins from investment management alone, from investment management plus other fund services (excluding distribution) provided to the Funds by DeAM (principally shareholder services), and DeAM profits from all sources, including distribution. A later section comments on overall profitability.
Economies of Scale
Economies of scale — an expected decline in management cost per dollar of fund assets as fund assets grow — are very rarely quantified and documented because of inherent difficulties in collecting and analyzing relevant data. However, in virtually every investment category that I reviewed, larger funds tend to have lower fees and lower total expenses than smaller funds. To see how each DWS Scudder Fund compares with this industry observation, I reviewed:
The trend in Fund assets over the last five years and the accompanying trend in total expenses. This shows if the Fund has grown and, if so, whether total expense (management fees as well as other expenses) have declined as a percent of assets.
Whether the Fund has break-points in its management fee schedule, the extent of the fee reduction built into the schedule and the asset levels where the breaks take effect, and in the case of a sub-advised Fund how the Fund's break-points compare with those of the sub-advisory fee schedule.
How the Fund's contractual fee schedule compares with trends in the industry data. To accomplish this, I constructed a chart showing how actual latest-fiscal-year contractual fees of the Fund and of other similar funds relate to average fund assets, with the subject Fund's contractual fee schedule superimposed.
Quality of Service — Performance
The quality-of-service evaluation focused on investment performance, which is the principal result of the investment management service. Each Fund's performance was reviewed over the past 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, as applicable, and compared with that of other funds in the same investment category and with a suitable market index.
In addition, I calculated and reviewed risk-adjusted returns relative to an index of similar mutual funds' returns and a suitable market index. The risk-adjusted returns analysis provides a way of determining the extent to which the Fund's return comparisons are mainly the product of investment value-added (or lack thereof) or alternatively taking considerably more or less risk than is typical in its investment category.
I also received and considered the history of portfolio manager changes for each Fund, as this provided an important context for evaluating the performance results.
Complex-Level Considerations
While this evaluation was conducted mainly at the individual fund level, there are some issues relating to the reasonableness of fees that can alternatively be considered across the whole fund complex:
I reviewed DeAM's profitability analysis for all DWS Scudder funds, with a view toward determining if the allocation procedures used were reasonable and how profit levels compared with public data for other investment managers.
I considered whether DeAM and affiliates receive any significant ancillary or "fall-out" benefits that should be considered in interpreting the direct profitability results. These would be situations where serving as the investment manager of the Funds is beneficial to another part of the Deutsche Bank organization.
I considered how aggregated DWS Scudder Fund expenses had varied over the years, by asset class and in the context of trends in asset levels.
I reviewed the structure of the DeAM organization, trends in staffing levels, and information on compensation of investment management and other professionals compared with industry data.
Findings
Based on the process and analysis discussed above, which included reviewing a wide range of information from management and external data sources and considering among other factors the fees DeAM charges other clients, the fees charged by other fund managers, DeAM's costs and profits associated with managing the Funds, economies of scale, possible fall-out benefits, and the nature and quality of services provided, in my opinion the management fees charged the DWS Scudder Funds are reasonable.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42ded/42dede25775d4bae687d1a51f5cdc22c8142ebe1" alt="svs1_m0"
Thomas H. Mack
Trustees and Officers
The following table presents certain information regarding the Board Members and Officers of the Trust as of December 31, 2007. Each Board Member's year of birth is set forth in parentheses after his or her name. Unless otherwise noted, (i) each Board Member has engaged in the principal occupation(s) noted in the table for at least the most recent five years, although not necessarily in the same capacity; and (ii) the address of each Independent Board Member is c/o Dawn-Marie Driscoll, PO Box 100176, Cape Coral, FL 33904. The term of office for each Board Member is until the election and qualification of a successor, or until such Board Member sooner dies, resigns, is removed or as otherwise provided in the governing documents of the fund. Because the fund does not hold an annual meeting of shareholders, each Board Member will hold office for an indeterminate period. The Board Members may also serve in similar capacities with other funds in the fund complex.
Independent Board Members |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served | Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years | Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen |
Dawn-Marie Driscoll (1946) Chairperson since 2004 Board Member since 1987
| President, Driscoll Associates (consulting firm); Executive Fellow, Center for Business Ethics, Bentley College; formerly, Partner, Palmer & Dodge (1988-1990); Vice President of Corporate Affairs and General Counsel, Filene's (1978-1988). Directorships: Trustee of eight open-end mutual funds managed by Sun Capital Advisers, Inc. (since 2007); Director of ICI Mutual Insurance Company (since 2007); Advisory Board, Center for Business Ethics, Bentley College; Trustee, Southwest Florida Community Foundation (charitable organization). Former Directorships: Investment Company Institute (audit, executive, nominating committees) and Independent Directors Council (governance, executive committees)
| 76 |
Henry P. Becton, Jr. (1943) Board Member since 1990
| Vice Chair, WGBH Educational Foundation. Directorships: Association of Public Television Stations; Becton Dickinson and Company1 (medical technology company); Belo Corporation1 (media company); Boston Museum of Science; Public Radio International. Former Directorships: American Public Television; Concord Academy; New England Aquarium; Mass. Corporation for Educational Telecommunications; Committee for Economic Development; Public Broadcasting Service
| 76 |
Keith R. Fox (1954) Board Member since 1996
| Managing General Partner, Exeter Capital Partners (a series of private equity funds). Directorships: Progressive Holding Corporation (kitchen goods importer and distributor); Natural History, Inc. (magazine publisher); Box Top Media Inc. (advertising); The Kennel Shop (retailer)
| 76 |
Kenneth C. Froewiss (1945) Board Member since 2005
| Clinical Professor of Finance, NYU Stern School of Business (1997-present); Member, Finance Committee, Association for Asian Studies (2002-present); Director, Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Group (US) (2004-present); prior thereto, Managing Director, J.P. Morgan (investment banking firm) (until 1996)
| 76 |
Martin J. Gruber (1937) Board Member since 2006
| Nomura Professor of Finance, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University (since September 1965); Director, Japan Equity Fund, Inc. (since January 1992), Thai Capital Fund, Inc. (since January 2000), Singapore Fund, Inc. (since January 2000), National Bureau of Economic Research (since January 2006). Formerly, Trustee, TIAA (pension funds) (January 1996-January 2000); Trustee, CREF and CREF Mutual Funds (January 2000-March 2005); Chairman, CREF and CREF Mutual Funds (February 2004-March 2005); and Director, S.G. Cowen Mutual Funds (January 1985-January 2001)
| 76 |
Richard J. Herring (1946) Board Member since 2006
| Jacob Safra Professor of International Banking and Professor, Finance Department, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania (since July 1972); Co-Director, Wharton Financial Institutions Center (since July 2000); Director, Japan Equity Fund, Inc. (since September 2007), Thai Capital Fund, Inc. (since September 2007), Singapore Fund, Inc. (since September 2007). Formerly, Vice Dean and Director, Wharton Undergraduate Division (July 1995-June 2000); Director, Lauder Institute of International Management Studies (July 2000-June 2006)
| 76 |
Graham E. Jones (1933) Board Member since 2006
| Senior Vice President, BGK Realty, Inc. (commercial real estate) (since 1995). Formerly, Trustee of various investment companies managed by Sun Capital Advisors, Inc. (1998-2005), Morgan Stanley Asset Management (1985-2001) and Weiss, Peck and Greer (1985-2005)
| 76 |
Rebecca W. Rimel (1951) Board Member since 2006
| President and Chief Executive Officer, The Pew Charitable Trusts (charitable organization) (1994 to present); Trustee, Thomas Jefferson Foundation (charitable organization) (1994 to present); Trustee, Executive Committee, Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce (2001 to present). Formerly, Executive Vice President, The Glenmede Trust Company (investment trust and wealth management) (1983-2004); Board Member, Investor Education (charitable organization) (2004-2005); Director, Viasys Health Care1 (January 2007-June 2007)
| 76 |
William N. Searcy, Jr. (1946) Board Member since 2006
| Private investor since October 2003; Trustee of eight open-end mutual funds managed by Sun Capital Advisers, Inc. (since October 1998). Formerly, Pension & Savings Trust Officer, Sprint Corporation1 (telecommunications) (November 1989-September 2003)
| 76 |
Jean Gleason Stromberg (1943) Board Member since 1997
| Retired. Formerly, Consultant (1997-2001); Director, US Government Accountability Office (1996-1997); Partner, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P. (law firm) (1978-1996). Directorships: The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation; Service Source, Inc. Former Directorships: Mutual Fund Directors Forum (2002-2004), American Bar Retirement Association (funding vehicle for retirement plans) (1987-1990 and 1994-1996)
| 76 |
Carl W. Vogt (1936) Board Member since 2002
| Retired Senior Partner, Fulbright & Jaworski, L.L.P. (law firm); formerly, President (interim) of Williams College (1999-2000); formerly, President of certain funds in the Deutsche Asset Management family of funds (formerly, Flag Investors family of funds) (registered investment companies) (1999-2000). Directorships: Yellow Corporation (trucking); American Science & Engineering (x-ray detection equipment). Former Directorships: ISI Family of Funds (registered investment companies, four funds overseen); National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak); Waste Management, Inc. (solid waste disposal). Formerly, Chairman and Member, National Transportation Safety Board
| 74 |
Interested Board Member |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served | Business Experience and Directorships During the Past Five Years | Number of Funds in Fund Complex Overseen |
Axel Schwarzer2 (1958) Board Member since 2006
| Managing Director4, Deutsche Asset Management; Head of Deutsche Asset Management Americas; CEO of DWS Scudder; formerly, board member of DWS Investments, Germany (1999-2005); formerly, Head of Sales and Product Management for the Retail and Private Banking Division of Deutsche Bank in Germany (1997-1999); formerly, various strategic and operational positions for Deutsche Bank Germany Retail and Private Banking Division in the field of investment funds, tax driven instruments and asset management for corporates (1989-1996)
| 82 |
Officers3 |
Name, Year of Birth, Position with the Fund and Length of Time Served | Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years and Other Directorships Held |
Michael G. Clark5 (1965) President, 2006-present
| Managing Director4, Deutsche Asset Management (2006-present); President of DWS family of funds; Director, ICI Mutual Insurance Company (since October 2007); formerly, Director of Fund Board Relations (2004-2006) and Director of Product Development (2000-2004), Merrill Lynch Investment Managers; Senior Vice President Operations, Merrill Lynch Asset Management (1999-2000)
|
John Millette6 (1962) Vice President and Secretary, 1999-present
| Director4, Deutsche Asset Management
|
Paul H. Schubert5 (1963) Chief Financial Officer, 2004-present Treasurer, 2005-present
| Managing Director4, Deutsche Asset Management (since July 2004); formerly, Executive Director, Head of Mutual Fund Services and Treasurer for UBS Family of Funds (1998-2004); Vice President and Director of Mutual Fund Finance at UBS Global Asset Management (1994-1998)
|
Patricia DeFilippis5 (1963) Assistant Secretary, 2005-present
| Vice President, Deutsche Asset Management (since June 2005); formerly, Counsel, New York Life Investment Management LLC (2003-2005); legal associate, Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC (1998-2003)
|
Elisa D. Metzger5 (1962) Assistant Secretary 2005-present
| Director4, Deutsche Asset Management (since September 2005); formerly, Counsel, Morrison and Foerster LLP (1999-2005)
|
Caroline Pearson6 (1962) Assistant Secretary, 1997-present
| Managing Director4, Deutsche Asset Management
|
Paul Antosca6 (1957) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present
| Director4, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2006); Vice President, The Manufacturers Life Insurance Company (U.S.A.) (1990-2006)
|
Jack Clark6 (1967) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present
| Director4, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2007); formerly, Vice President, State Street Corporation (2002-2007)
|
Kathleen Sullivan D'Eramo6 (1957) Assistant Treasurer, 2003-present
| Director4, Deutsche Asset Management
|
Diane Kenneally6 (1966) Assistant Treasurer, 2007-present
| Director4, Deutsche Asset Management
|
Jason Vazquez4 (1972) Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer, 2007-present
| Vice President, Deutsche Asset Management (since 2006); formerly, AML Operations Manager for Bear Stearns (2004-2006), Supervising Compliance Principal and Operations Manager for AXA Financial (1999-2004)
|
Robert Kloby5 (1962) Chief Compliance Officer, 2006-present
| Managing Director4, Deutsche Asset Management (2004-present); formerly, Chief Compliance Officer/Chief Risk Officer, Robeco USA (2000-2004); Vice President, The Prudential Insurance Company of America (1988-2000); E.F. Hutton and Company (1984-1988)
|
J. Christopher Jackson5 (1951) Chief Legal Officer, 2006-present
| Director4, Deutsche Asset Management (2006-present); formerly, Director, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, Hansberger Global Investors, Inc. (1996-2006); Director, National Society of Compliance Professionals (2002-2005) (2006-2009)
|
1 A publicly held company with securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.2 The mailing address of Axel Schwarzer is c/o Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc., 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154. Mr. Schwarzer is an interested Board Member by virtue of his positions with Deutsche Asset Management.3 As a result of their respective positions held with the Advisor, these individuals are considered "interested persons" of the Advisor within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Interested persons receive no compensation from the funds.4 Executive title, not a board directorship.5 Address: 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154.6 Address: Two International Place, Boston, MA 02110.The fund's Statement of Additional Information ("SAI") includes additional information about the Board Members. The SAI is available, without charge, upon request. If you would like to request a copy of the SAI, you may do so by calling the following toll-free number: (800) 621-1048.
Notes
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/787b2/787b2ed7d10c3f9b7837425dbaceb3738a782deb" alt="svs1_backcover0"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c85ec/c85ecb565bf6709e3b0ff1e471893b039ef174d6" alt="svs1_backcover logo0"
DWS Scudder is part of Deutsche Asset Management, which is the marketing name in the US for the asset management activities of Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Deutsche Investment Management Americas Inc. and DWS Trust Company.
The views expressed in this report reflect those of the portfolio managers only through the end of the period of the report as stated on the cover. The managers' views are subject to change at any time based on market and other conditions and should not be construed as a recommendation.
This information must be preceded or accompanied by a current prospectus.
Portfolio changes should not be considered recommendations for action by individual investors.
DWS Scudder Distributors, Inc.
222 South Riverside Plaza
Chicago, IL 60606
(800) 778-1482
VS1-2 (53318 2/08)
ITEM 2. | CODE OF ETHICS |
| |
| As of the end of the period, December 31, 2007, DWS Variable Series I has a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. There have been no amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of the code of ethics during the period covered by this report that would require disclosure under Item 2. A copy of the code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. |
| |
ITEM 3. | AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT |
| |
| The Funds’ audit committee is comprised solely of trustees who are “independent” (as such term has been defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in regulations implementing Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (the “Regulations”)). The Funds’ Board of Trustees has determined that there are several “audit committee financial experts” serving on the Funds’ audit committee. The Board has determined that Keith R Fox, the chair of the Funds’ audit committee, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” (as such term has been defined by the Regulations) based on its review of Mr. Fox’s pertinent experience and education. The SEC has stated that the designation or identification of a person as an audit committee financial expert pursuant to this Item 3 of Form N-CSR does not impose on such person any duties, obligations or liability that are greater than the duties, obligations and liability imposed on such person as a member of the audit committee and board of directors in the absence of such designation or identification. |
| |
ITEM 4. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
| |
DWS VARIABLE SERIES I
FORM N-CSR DISCLOSURE RE: AUDIT FEES
The following table shows the amount of fees that PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP (“PWC”), the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm, billed to the Fund during the Fund’s last two fiscal years. The Audit Committee approved in advance all audit services and non-audit services that PWC provided to the Fund.
The Audit Committee has delegated certain pre-approval responsibilities to its Chairman (or, in his absence, any other member of the Audit Committee).
Services that the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Billed to the Fund
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | Audit Fees Billed to Fund | Audit-Related Fees Billed to Fund | Tax Fees Billed to Fund | All Other Fees Billed to Fund |
2007 | $190,775 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
2006 | $197,500 | $128 | $0 | $0 |
The above “Audit- Related Fees” were billed for agreed upon procedures performed.
Services that the Fund’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Billed to the Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers
The following table shows the amount of fees billed by PWC to Deutsche Investment Management Americas, Inc. (“DeIM” or the “Adviser”), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with DeIM (“Control Affiliate”) that provides ongoing services to the Fund (“Affiliated Fund Service Provider”), for engagements directly related to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting, during the Fund’s last two fiscal years.
Fiscal Year December 31, | Audit-Related Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers | Tax Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers | All Other Fees Billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers |
2007 | $58,500 | $25,000 | $0 |
2006 | $155,500 | $11,930 | $0 |
The “Audit-Related Fees” were billed for services in connection with the agreed-upon procedures related to fund mergers and additional costs related to annual audits and the above “Tax Fees” were billed in connection with tax consultation and agreed-upon procedures.
Non-Audit Services
The following table shows the amount of fees that PWC billed during the Fund’s last two fiscal years for non-audit services. The Audit Committee pre-approved all non-audit services that PWC provided to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider that related directly to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting. The Audit Committee requested and received information from PWC about any non-audit services that PWC rendered during the Fund’s last fiscal year to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider. The Committee considered this information in evaluating PWC’s independence.
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, | Total Non-Audit Fees Billed to Fund (A) | Total Non-Audit Fees billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (engagements related directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Fund) (B) | Total Non-Audit Fees billed to Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (all other engagements) (C) | Total of (A), (B)
and (C) |
2007 | $0 | $25,000 | $600,000 | $625,000 |
2006 | $0 | $11,930 | $0 | $11,930 |
All other engagement fees were billed for services provided by PWC for services related to consulting on an IT project.
| |
ITEM 5. | AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS |
| |
| Not Applicable |
| |
ITEM 6. | SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS |
| |
| Not Applicable |
| |
ITEM 7. | DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
| |
| Not applicable. |
| |
ITEM 8. | PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES |
| |
| Not applicable. |
ITEM 9. | PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS |
| |
| Not Applicable. |
ITEM 10. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
| |
| The Committee on Independent Trustees/Directors selects and nominates Independent Trustees/Directors. Fund shareholders may submit nominees that will be considered by the committee when a Board vacancy occurs. Submissions should be mailed to: c/o Dawn-Marie Driscoll, PO Box 100176, Cape Coral, FL 33910. |
| |
ITEM 11. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
| |
| (a) The Chief Executive and Financial Officers concluded that the Registrant’s Disclosure Controls and Procedures are effective based on the evaluation of the Disclosure Controls and Procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report. |
| |
| (b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s last half-year (the registrant’s second fiscal half-year in the case of the annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. |
| |
ITEM 12. | EXHIBITS |
| |
| (a)(1) Code of Ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed and attached hereto as EX-99.CODE ETH. |
| |
| (a)(2) Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) is filed and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.CERT. |
| |
| (b) Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)) is furnished and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.906CERT. |
Form N-CSR Item F
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant: | DWS Variable Series I |
President
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Registrant: | DWS Variable Series I |
President
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer